No matching fragments found in this document.
TO THE READER:
Scientology is a religious philosophy containing pastoral
counseling procedures intended to assist an individual to gain
greater knowledge. of self. The Mission of the Church of
Scientology is a simple one--to help the individual achieve
greater self-confidence and personal integrity, thereby enabling
him to really trust and respect himself and his fellow man. The
attainment of the benefits and goals of Scientology requires each
individual's positive participation, as only through his own
efforts can he achieve these.
This is part of the religious literature and works of the
Founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard. It is presented to the
reader as part of the record of his personal research into Life,
and should be construed only as a written report- of such
research and not as a statement of claims made by the Church
or the author.
Scientology and its sub-study, Dianetics, as practiced by the
Church, address only the spiritual side of Man. Although the
Church, as are all churches, is free to engage in spiritual
healing, it does not, as its primary goal is increased knowledge
and personal integrity for all. For this reason, the Church does
not wish to accept individuals who desire treatment of physical
illness or insanity, but refers these to qualified specialists in
other organizations who deal in these matters.
The Hubbard Electrometer is a religious artifact used in the
Church confessional. It, in itself, does nothing, and is used by
Ministers only, to assist parishioners in locating areas of
spiritual distress or travail.
We hope the reading of this book is only the first stage of a
personal voyage of discovery into the positive and effective
religion of Scientology.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Church of Scientology
This book belongs to __________________________________________
Date ________________________
-------------------------
Blank Page
-------------------------
The
Organization Executive
Course
AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENTOLOGY POLICY
by
L. Ron Hubbard
FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
TECHNICAL
DIVISION
4
PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION
Published by
the
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA
PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION
2723 West Temple Street
Los Angeles
California 90026
U.S.A.
The Church of Scientology is a Non-Profit Organization.
Dianetics ($) and Scientology ($) are Registered Names.
Copyright ($) 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974
1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959
1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Scientology is an Applied Religious Philosophy
No part of this book may be reproduced
without permission of the copyright owner.
First U.S. Printing 1974
Second U.S. Printing 1976
Complete Set ISBN 0-88404-033-X
Volume 4 ISBN 0--88404-029-1
The E-Meter is not intended or effective for the diagnosis,
treatment or prevention of any disease.
Dianetics and Scientology are the trademarks of L. Ron Hubbard
in respect of his published works.
Printed in the United States of America by Kingsport Press, Inc.
--------------------------------
CONTENTS
TECHNICAL
DIVISION 4
(A study of this Division should include the section
on Fast Flow in OEC Volume 5.)
1965 Technical Division 4 Org Board Outline
1
2 Nov. 1967 Tech Division, Departments of Tech Services,
Training and Processing
2
27 Nov. 1959 Key to the Organizational Chart of the Founding Church
of
Scientology of Washington DC (excerpt: Technical
Division) 4
14 Feb. 1961 The Pattern of a Central Organization
(excerpt: Technical Division)
5
20 Nov. 1965 The Promotional Actions of an Organization
(excerpt: Technical Division 4)
7
30 Sept. 1965 Statistics for Divisions (excerpt: Tech Division 4)
8
12 Oct. 1966 OIC Graphs-Clearing and OT Course
Div IV Statistics, LRH Comm Statistic
9
27 Apr. 1967 Tech Division Statistic (amendment to 30 Sept. 1965)
10
4 Oct. 1967 Auditor and Org Individual Stats
10
31 Mar. 1969 Completions Statistic, Triple Grades, Tech & Qual
Divisions 11
8 Apr. 1969 Cancellation of HCO P/L 31 March 1969
11
22 Sept. 1969 HGC Statistic (amends 30 Sept. 1965 & 31 Mar. 1969)
12
17 June 1970 OIC Change-Cable Change (amends 30 Sept. 1965)
Vol. 1-359
14 Oct. 1970 Division IV Org Board, Ideal Scenes and Stats
13
5 Feb. 1971 Org Gross Divisional Statistics Revised (excerpt: Tech
Division 4)
20
26 Sept. 1956 Flow Line for Personnel (HCOB)
20
1 Apr. 1957 Technical and Administrative Divisions
21
7 May 1957 Assignment of Auditors, Rooms, Students
22
1 June 1957 Rights of the Directors of Training & Processing, Staff
Auditors
& Instructors regarding Preclears & Students (HCO Info
Bull.) 23
11 July 1957 Tech Staff Certificate Validation (Assoc Sec Directive)
24
19 June 1958 Freeloaders
Vol. 1-140
6 Oct. 1958 Who can be Processed-Who can be Trained
Vol. 1-510
14 Nov. 1960 Sign Up of Students & Pcs-Acceptance by D/P & D/T
(excerpt) 24
26 May 1961 A Message to the Executive Secretaries and All Org
Staff
Quality Counts (reissued 21 June 1967)
25
23 Oct. 1961 E-Meters to be Approved
Vol. 2-228
22 Jan. 1962 Crash Programme
26
30 Jan. 1962 Technical Director and Administrator
27
18 Feb. 1962 Technical Director Basic Hat
see-28
26 Mar. 1962 Staff Regulation-Relations with Pcs and Students
27
6 Apr. 1962 Technical Director Basic Hat (cancels 18 Feb. 1962)
28
21 Nov. 1962 Re-issue of Materials Vol 1-
44, Vol 2-92
4 Apr. 1963 District Offices Technical Reports to HCO WW
29
4 Apr. 1963 Important Changes in Technical Reports to HCO WW
29
4 Apr. 1963 HCO WW Post Disbanded-HCO Technical Secretary WW
35
11 Apr. 1963 Technical Director's Weekly Reports
35
19 Apr. 1963 Handling Org Technical Queries
36
3 July 1963 Change of Routing: Org Technical Reports
36
4 Oct. 1963 Technical Council
37
10 Feb. 1964 Enrolment on Self Determinism (reissued 23 June 1967)
37
24 Feb. 1964 Technical Supervision Changes
38
20 Mar. 1964 Technical Reports
39
12 Aug. 1964 Policy on Technical Information
39
23 Sept. 1964 Auditing and Training Policies (excerpt)
40
21 Jan. 1965 Vital Data on Promotion (revised 5 Apr. 1965)
Vol. 2- 4
7 Feb. 1965 Keeping Scientology Working (reissued 15 June 1970,
28 Jan. I973)
44
14 Feb. 1965 Safeguarding Technology (reissued 7 June 1967)
49
v
28 Feb. 1965 Deliver
51
5 Apr. 1965 Handling the Suppressive Person-The Basis of Insanity
53
5 Apr. 1965 The No-Gain-Case Student
61
19 Apr. 1965 Training and Processing Regulations-Technical
Discipline
Students' Questions
65
28 Apr. 1965 Technical Personnel
67
29 Apr. 1965 Ethics-Review (excerpt)
68
29 Apr. 1965 Bonuses
Vol. 3-313
8 May 1965 Results of HCO Technical Investigation
Vol. 1-405
1 July 1965 Ethics Chits
69
1 July 1965 Comm Cycle Additives
Vol. 1-426
5 July 1965 Assignment of Tech Personnel
70
7 July 1965 Releases, Policy on
71
11 July 1965 Assignment of Tech Personnel (amends & cancels 5 July
1965) 70
13 July 1965 Testing
73
26 July 1965 Release Declaration Restrictions-Healing Amendments
74
1 Sept. 1965 Some Tech Div Policies
75
24 Sept. 1965 Student and Pc Reports
77
23 Nov. 1965 Mark V and Listing E-Meters
Vol. 2-234
28 Dec. 1965 E-Meters Allowed
77
1 Feb. 1966 HGC Cure-Interne Training and Staff Auditors
78
1 Feb. 1966 Staff Auditor and Supervisor Procurement
80
10 Feb. 1966 Tech Recovery
81
10 Feb. 1966 Bonuses for Service Delivery
Vol. 3-204
7 Mar. 1966 HGC Cure (Continued)
84
7 Mar. 1966 Star Rates on Tech and Qual Staff
85
8 Mar. 1966 High Crime
86
9 May 1966 Bonuses Adjusted (correction to 10 Feb. 1966)
Vol. 3-206
21 July 1966 Tech vs Qual
88
22 Aug. 1966 Bonuses Adjusted (amendment & addition to 9 May 1966)
Vol. 3-207
17 Oct. 1966 Bonuses
Vol. 3-209
21 Nov. 1966 Addendum to HCO Pol Ltr of
17 October 1966, "Bonuses"
Vol. 3-211
7 June 1967 Safeguarding Technology (reissue of 14 Feb. 1965)
49
21 June 1967 A Message to the Executive Secretaries and All Org
Staff
Quality Counts (reissue of 26 May 1961)
25
23 June 1967 Enrolment on Self Determinism (reissue of 10 Feb.
1964) 37
11 Aug. 1967 Second Dynamic Rules
89
20 Sept. 1967 Confidential Data
90
4 Oct. 1967 Auditor and Org Individual Stats
10
2 Nov. 1967 Tech Division, Departments of Tech Services,
Training and Processing
2
20 Nov. 1967 Out Tech
90
27 Nov. 1967 Bonuses Adjusted (addition to 17 Oct. 1966,
cancels 22 Aug. 1966)
Vol. 3-211
31 May 1968 Scientology Technology
91
31 May 1968 Auditors
Vol. 0- 42
24 Aug. 1968 Dissemination
91
28 Oct. 1968 Technical Reports (cancels 20 Mar. 1964)
92
21 Nov. 1968 Senior Policy
92
20 Jan. 1969 A Vital Target-Trained Auditor Programme (LRH ED 81
INT) 93
29 Jan. 1969 Maintaining Standard Tech
95
5 Feb. 1969 Press Policy-Code of a Scientologist
Vol. 0- 25
20 Oct. 1969 Technical Divisions-Promotion and Responsibility
96
15 Nov. 1969 Rights and Duties
98
23 Feb. 1970 Ethics-Quality of Service
100
30 May 1970 Curatives
102
3 June 1970 Orders to Divisions for Immediate Compliance
(LRH ED 107 INT) (excerpt: Division IV)
104
15 June 1970 Keeping Scientology Working (reissue of 7 Feb. 1965)
see- 44
17 June 1970 Technical Degrades
106
14 Oct. 1970 Division IV Org Board, Ideal Scenes and Stats
13
vi
THE AUDITOR'S CODE
20 Nov. 1950 Instruction Protocol-Official (reissued 2 Sept. 1970)
108
14 Oct. 1968 The Auditor's Code AD 18
111
2 Nov. 1968 Auditor's Code-Add to Pol Ltr 14 October AD18
see-112
5 May 1969 Auditor's Code and Dianetics
234
2 Sept. 1970 Instruction Protocol-Official (reissue of 20 Nov. 1950)
108
POLICIES ON "SOURCES OF TROUBLE"
6 Oct. 1958 Who can be Processed-Who can be Trained
Vol. 1-510
30 Aug. 1960 Training Restrictions
Vol. 1-512
27 Oct. 1964 Policies on Physical Healing, Insanity
and "Troublesome Sources"
Vol. 1-513
5 Nov. 1964 Corrections to HCO Policy Letters
Vol. 1-516
10 Feb. 1964 Enrolment on Self Determinism (reissued 23 June 1967)
Vol. 1-516
27 Oct. 1964 Policies on Physical Healing, Insanity and Potential
Trouble Sources (reissued 23 June 1967)
Vol. 1-517
7 Apr. 1965 Healing Policy in Field
Vol. 1-521
26 July 1965 Release Declaration Restrictions-Healing Amendments
Vol. 1-522
21 Feb. 1969 Cancellation of Pol Ltr of November 5, 1964
Vol. 1-523
13 Mar. 1969 Addition to HCO Pol Ltr of 23 June 1967
Vol. 1-523
6 Apr. 1969 Dianetics
Vol. 1-524
7 May 1969 Policies on "Sources of Trouble"
Vol. 1-525
12 June 1969 Dianetic Registration
Vol. 1-527
l6 May 1970 Institutional and Shock Cases, Petitions from
Vol. 1-529
DEPARTMENT TEN
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Student Administration
HGC Administration
16 Apr. 1970 Tech Services
113
5 Sept. 1957 Testing
115
23 Nov. 1958 Scientometric Testing (Sec ED)
115
30 Apr. 1959 Additional Staff Auditors
116
9 June 1959 Student Files
116
19 Nov. 1960 Pc Scheduling
117
30 Jan. 1961 Case Files
117
24 Mar. 1961 HGC Admin Partial Hat-Staff Auditor Assignment
118
12 Dec. 1961 Training Activities
408
25 Apr. 1962 Hat of Course Administrator
see-121
21 Aug. 1962 Body Router Hat
120
22 Apr. 1963 Hat of Course Administrator
121
9 May 1965 Auditing Fees-Preferential Treatment of Preclears
Scale of Preference
122
4 July 1965 Pc Routing-Review Code
603
19 July 1965 Release Checks, Procedure for
574
12 Sept. 1965 E-Meters and Books for Academy Students
140
3 Nov. 1965 Pc Scheduling
124
1 Feb. 1966 HGC Cure-Interne Training and Staff Auditors
78
29 June 1966 Keep Academy Check Sheets Up-to-Date
124
22 Sept. 1967 Solo Auditing Folders
475
11 May 1969 Standard Admin for Training and Tech Services
125
16 May 1969 Course Administration
209
29 May 1969 Dianetic Certificates
126
11 June 1969 Materials, Scarcity of (HCOB)
126
23 July 1969 Auditor Assignment Policies
127
29 July 1969 Course Administration Roll Book
128
8 Nov. 1969 Tech Services (FO 2175 reissued as HCO P/L 16 Apr.
1970) 113
16 Apr. 1970 Tech Services
113
vii
DEPARTMENT ELEVEN
DEPARTMENT OF TRAINING
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING
20 Nov. 1950 Instruction Protocol-Official (reissued 2 Sept. 1970)
108
10 Apr. 1957 Student Intensives
219
7 May 1957 Assignment of Auditors, Rooms, Students
22
13 May 1957 Financial Enrollment Procedure
129
24 May 1957 Stable Data for Instructors (HCOB)
146
1 June 1957 Rights of the Directors of Training & Processing, Staff
Auditors & Instructors regarding Preclears & Students
(HCO Info Bull.)
23
25 Jan. 1958 Inept Students
148
6 May 1958 Modified Procedure for Signing Up Prospective
Students & Pcs (Admin Directive)
130
9 May 1958 Who Should Take Which Class (HCOB)
130
26 Aug. 1959 Promotional Functions of the Academy (excerpt)
131
16 Oct. 1959 Handling Students' and Auditors' Reports (HCOB)
131
23 Oct. 1959 Academy Training
132
4 May 1960 Acceptance for ACC and Academy Courses
281
7 July 1960 Training Applicants
132
30 Aug. 1960 Training Restrictions
133
14 Nov. 1960 Sign Up of Students & Pcs-Acceptance by D/P & D/T
(excerpt) 24
31 Jan. 1961 Academy Meters
134
14 Feb. 1961 The Pattern of a Central Organization
(excerpt: The Academy of Scientology)
5
2 Nov. 1961 Training Quality (reissued 3 Mar. 1967)
134
8 Dec. 1961 Director of Training-Weekly Report Form
135
13 Dec. 1961 Extension Course Completion
136
14 May 1962 Training Sections
311
16 May 1962 HPA/HCA Training
136
19 Oct. 1962 Preparation of HPA/HCA Certificates
137
4 Apr. 1963 Director of Training Weekly Student Interviews
137
10 May 1963 Student Rates for HGC Auditing in SA Orgs
Vol. 3-231
8 Aug. 1963 "Plants" in Academies-Introduction of "Form" 5B
138
25 Sept. 1963 Right to Refuse HPA/HCA Student Application
139
18 Dec. 1964 Re: OIC Data
139
29 Apr. 1965 Ethics-Review (excerpt)
68
12 Sept. 1965 E-Meters and Books for Academy Students
140
1 Feb. 1966 Staff Auditor and Supervisor Procurement
80
29 June 1966 Keep Academy Check Sheets Up-to-Date
24
5 Oct. 1966 Students Terminating-Leave of Absence-Blown Students
469
3 Mar. 1967 Training Quality (reissue of 2 Nov. 1961)
134
COURSE SUPERVISION
Circa 1957 The Supervisor's Code (revised 15 Sept. 1967)
141
2 Dec. 1962 Supervisor's Stable Data (reissued as amended 7 Sept.
1967) 143
20 Nov. 1950 Instruction Protocol-Official (reissued 2 Sept. I970)
108
5 Mar. 1957 Student Reports (HCOB)
145
17 May 1957 Definitions (HCO TB)
145
24 May 1957 Stable Data for Instructors (HCOB)
146
15 July 1957 Our First Lesson in Training (HCO TB)
147
4 Sept. 1957 Stable Data for Instructors (HCOB)
147
25 Jan. 1958 Inept Students
148
2 Apr. 1958 ARC in Comm Course (HCOB)
149
23 Apr. 1958 Vital Training Data for Training Hats and Registrar
(HCOB) 149
29 Sept. 1958 Vital Training Data (HCOB)
150
4 May 1959 How to Write a Curriculum (HCOB)
151
26 Aug. 1959 Promotional Functions of the Academy (excerpt)
131
16 Oct. 1959 Handling Students' and Auditors' Reports (HCOB)
131
24 Feb. 1960 ACC Hats
351
viii
31 Jan. 1961 Academy Meters
134
14 Feb. 1961 The Pattern of a Central Organization
(excerpt: The Academy of Scientology)
5
17 Apr. 1961 Training, Professional-New Policy
295
7 June 1961 Academy Schedule, Clarification of (HCOB)
297
2 Nov. 1961 Training Quality (reissued 3 Mar. I967)
134
22 Nov. 1961 Training Course Rules and Regulations
152
8 Dec. 1961 Instructors' Weekly Report Form
154
8 Dec. 1961 Students' Weekly Reports to Ron
(amended & reissued 23 Oct. 1967)
155
20 Dec. 1961 Student E-Metering
307
10 Jan. 1962 HCO Standing Order No. 5-Students
(reissued as amended 21 June 1967)
156
4 Apr. 1962 Training Course Regulations (Added)
157
16 Apr. 1962 Regulations, Academies and Courses
157
9 May 1962 Addition to Students' Weekly Report (adds to 8 Dec.
1961) 158
14 May 1962 Training Sections
311
21 May 1962 Tape Examinations
158
24 May 1962 Training-Session Cancellation-Auditing Section
318
26 May 1962 Training Drills Must Be Correct
159
9 July 1962 Special Briefing Course
404
12 July 1962 The British Mark IV E-Meter
Vol. 2-231
2 Aug. 1962 Training Aids
160
17 Sept. 1962 An Arrangement of the Academy
327
21 Oct. 1962 Auditing Supervisor and Auditing Instructors, Duties of
335
2 Dec. 1962 Instructors' Stable Data
161
14 Feb. 1963 How to Examine-Theory Examinations
163
15 Mar. 1963 Check Sheet Rating System
164
15 May 1963 Instructor Hats
164
18 Sept. 1963 Scientology Five-Scientology Instructors
165
24 Sept. 1963 Course Rules and Regulations
166
25 Sept. 1963 Hats of Student Instructors for SHSBC
168
27 Sept. 1963 Training Technology-Pink Sheets
171
23 Oct. 1963 Students' Weekly Reports to Ron
see-155
28 Oct. 1963 Student ARC Breaks
173
20 Feb. 1964 Regulations-Course (excerpt)
436
10 Apr. 1964 Scientology Courses (reissued as amended 23 June 1967)
174
12 May 1964 Theory Testing-Expiration Dates
175
25 May 1964 Instructor's Conference Report Form
444
11 June 1964 New Students Data
445
16 Sept. 1964 Understanding and Tape Lectures (reissued 21 July 1967)
176
24 Sept. 1964 Instruction & Examination: Raising the Standard of
177
4 Oct. 1964 Theory Check-Out Data (reissued 21 May 1967)
(modifies 24 Sept. 1964)
181
28 Feb. 1965 Course Check Outs-Twin-Checking
183
16 Mar. 1965 Further Material on Study-Examinations
(reissued 13 Sept. i967)
184
5 Apr. 1965 Handling the Suppressive Person-The Basis of Insanity
53
5 Apr. 1965 The No-Gain-Case Student
61
16 Apr. 1965 The "Hidden Data Line"
186
16 Apr. 1965 Drills, Allowed
188
19 Apr. 1965 Training and Processing Regulations
Technical Discipline-Students' Questions
65
5 May 1965 Supervisors
190
16 May 1965 Important Explanation-Auditing Restrictions
221
16 May 1965 Academy Courses-General Remarks-Zero Courses
Hubbard Recognized Scientologist
347
17 May 1965 Academy Processing
224
17 May 1965 Urgent-CCHs (cancels 15 May 1962)
191
24 May 1965 Student Guide to Acceptable Behavior
458
23 Aug. 1965 Deletion of TR 5
191
26 Aug. 1965 Scientology Training-Twin Checkouts
192
ix
21 Sept. 1965 E-Meter Drills
195
15 Dec. 1965 Students Guide to Acceptable Behaviour
196
I0 Feb. 1966 Check Sheets, Course
466
29 June 1966 Keep Academy Check Sheets Up-to-Date
124
12 Oct. 1966 Examinations
198
29 Dec. 1966 Routing and Handling of SHSBC, Dianetic,
Solo VI and Academy Students
198
21 May 1967 Theory Check-Out Data (reissue of 4 Oct. 1964)
(modifies 24 Sept. 1964)
181
21 June 1967 HCO Standing Order No. 5-Students
(reissue & amendment of 10 Jan. 1962)
156
23 June 1967 Scientology Courses (reissue & amendment of 10 Apr.
1964) 174
21 July 1967 Understanding and Tape Lectures (reissue of 16 Sept.
1964) 176
11 Aug. 1967 Second Dynamic Rules
89
7 Sept. 1967 Supervisor's Stable Data (reissue & amendment of 2 Dec.
1962) 143
13 Sept. 1967 Further Material on Study-Examinations
(reissue of 16 Mar. 1965)
184
15 Sept. 1967 The Supervisor's Code
141
18 Sept. 1967 Study-Complexity and Confronting
199
18 Oct. 1967 Academy Check Sheets-Supervisor Conditions
201
23 Oct. 1967 Students' Weekly Reports to Ron
(reissue & amendment of 8 Dec. 1961)
see-155
22 Nov. 1967 Out Tech (see also revised reissue 18 July 1970,
page 215)
Vol. 1-472
8 Mar. 1968 Checksheets
202
19 Oct. 1968 Course Completion-Student Indicators
202
24 Oct. 1968 Supervisor Know-How-Running the Class
203
24 Oct. 1968 Supervisor Know-How-Handling the Student
204
24 Oct. 1968 Supervisor Know-How-R Factor to Students
205
24 Oct. 1968 Supervisor Know-How-Tips in Handling Students
206
7 May 1969 Students Guide to Acceptable Behaviour
235
8 May 1969 How to Teach a Course
207
8 May 1969 Enturbulative Students
208
8 May 1969 Fast Flow by Attestation
237
8 May 1969 Teaching the Dianetics Course (HCOB)
238
14 May 1969 Star Rate Checkouts on Standard Dianetics Course
see-262
14 May 1969 How to do a Starrate Checkout
240
16 May 1969 Course Administration
209
24 May 1969 Progress Board
249
24 May 1969 Dianetics Course Supervision and Administration
Supervisor Checkouts
252
29 May 1969 Dianetic Certificates
126
1 June 1969 Dianetics Training
253
3 June 1969 Dianetic Course Pricing
Vol. 3-236
3 June 1969 Legal Statement concerning Dianetics & Medical Practice
Laws 254
7 June 1969 Dianetics-Points Which Go Out and Wreck Pcs (HCOB)
255
11 June 1969 Materials, Scarcity of (HCOB)
126
12 June 1969 Dianetic Registration
257
24 June 1969 Dianetics-Pre-Auditing Examination
259
11 July 1969 Supervision (HCOB)
260
22 July 1969 Fast Flow Training (cancels 28 Jan. 1969)
210
27 July 1969 What is a Checksheet
211
29 July 1969 Course Administration-Roll Book
128
30 July 1969 Student Progress Board (cancels 24 May 69)
212
6 Dec. 1969 Tech Retreads and Retraining
see-216
8 June 1970 Student Auditing (cancels 29 Oct. 1965, 23 May 1969 II,
17 May 1965 & 17 May 1965 II)
227
18 July 1970 Out Tech (revised reissue of 22 Nov. 1967)
215
22 July 1970 Tech Retreads and Retraining (amends 6 Dec. 1969)
216
16 Mar. 1971 What is a Course?
217
26 Jan. 1972 What is a Course? (amends 16 Mar. 1971)
see-218
(See Volume 6 for information on tape and film presentation)
X
STUDENT AUDITING
20 Nov. 1950 Instruction Protocol-Official (reissued 2 Sept. 1970)
108
10 Apr. 1957 Student Intensives
219
3 May 1957 Training-What it is Today-How we tell People about it
(HCOB) 268
9 May 1957 Student Intensives
see-219
25 Jan. 1958 Inept Students
148
29 Oct. 1959 Processing of Academy Students
219
15 Nov. 1960 Staff Certificate Requirements
220
17 Jan. 1962 Auditor Assignment
220
7 Feb. 1962 Restriction on Saint Hill Area (amends 20 Dec. 1960)
409
24 May 1962 Training-Session Cancellation-Auditing Section
318
17 Sept. 1962 An Arrangement of the Academy
327
20 Sept. 1962 Co-Audit Unit
413
21 Oct. 1962 Auditing Supervisor and Auditing Instructors, Duties of
335
28 Oct. 1962 Z Unit-Case Review
417
28 Oct. 1962 Co-Audit Suspended
418
11 Feb. 1963 Auditing Regulations
426
13 Feb. 1963 V Unit
427
29 Mar. 1963 Clear Requirement
429
18 June 1963 Students Blowing
432
2 Apr. 1965 Star-Rate Checkouts for Process (modification of 27
Feb. 1965)
453
16 May 1965 Important Explanation-Auditing Restrictions
221
17 May 1965 Free Scientology Centre
222
17 May 1965 Academy Processing
224
22 Oct. 1965 Requirements for Student Classification
225
29 Oct. 1965 Student Auditing of Preclears
226
30 Dec. 1966 What the SHSBC Student Needs to Know about Foundation
471
1 Feb. 1967 Student Auditing of Preclears (replaces 29 Oct. 1965)
226
24 Feb. 1968 Fast Flow for SHSBC Students' Preclears
(amends 30 Dec. 1966)
472
23 Apr. 1968 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
Vol. 2-283
23 May 1969 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
Vol. 2-289
23 May 1969 Dianetics Course Student Auditing
251
8 June 1970 Student Auditing (cancels 29 Oct. 1965, 23 May 1969 II,
17 May 1965 & 17 May 1965 II)
227
DIANETIC AUDITOR'S COURSE
3 Apr. 1966 Dianetic Auditor's Course
228
2 Aug. 1966 Dianetic Auditing
229
22 Sept. 1967 Dianetic Auditor's Course Auditing Policy
230
23 Feb. 1968 Dianetic Auditor's Course Auditing Policy
231
25 Jan. 1969 Dianetic Auditor's Course Auditing Policy
231
3 Sept. 1969 Former HDAs, HPAs
Vol. 3-238
STANDARD DIANETICS
Training and Auditing
6 Apr. 1969 Dianetics
232
6 Apr. 1969 Dianetic Registration
see-257
5 May 1969 Dianetic Course Examinations
233
5 May 1969 Auditor's Code and Dianetics
234
7 May 1969 Students Guide to Acceptable Behaviour
235
7 May 1969 Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course Policy
237
8 May 1969 Fast Flow by Attestation
237
8 May 1969 Teaching the Dianetics Course (HCOB)
238
8 May 1969 Out Tech (revision of 22 Nov. 1967)
239
14 May 1969 Star Rate Checkouts on Standard Dianetics Course
see-262
14 May 1969 How to do a Starrate Checkout
240
xi
16 May 1969 Course Administration
209
19 May 1969 Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course Policy (cancels 7 May
1969) 241
20 May 1969 Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course
Course Materials Papers and Files
242
20 May 1969 Keeping Dianetics Working in an Area (HCOB)
245
23 May 1969 Dianetic Contract
247
23 May 1969 Dianetics Course Student Auditing
251
23 May 1969 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
Vol. 2-289
24 May 1969 Progress Board
249
24 May 1969 Dianetics Course Supervision and Administration
Supervisor Checkouts
252
29 May 1969 Dianetic Certificates
126
1 June 1969 Dianetics Training
253
3 June 1969 Legal Statement concerning Dianetics & Medical Practice
Laws 254
7 June 1969 Dianetics-Points Which Go Out and Wreck Pcs (HCOB)
255
12 June 1969 Dianetic Registration (revises 6 Apr. 1969)
257
24 June 1969 Dianetics-Pre-Auditing Examination
259
11 July 1969 Supervision (HCOB)
260
27 July 1969 What is a Checksheet
211
27 July 1969 Antibiotics (HCOB)
Vol. 2-332
3 Aug. 1969 Starrate Checkouts on Standard Dianetics Course
(corrects & replaces 14 May 1969)
262
2 Sept. 1969 Correction to HCO PL 12 June 1969-Dianetic Registration
see-258
3 Sept. 1969 Former HDAs, HPAs
Vol. 2-295
5 Oct. 1969 Dianetic Courses, Wildcat (revised & reissued 10 Dec.
1969) 263
27 Oct. 1969 Training Aids (reissue of 2 Aug. 1962)
see-160
17 Nov. 1969 Dianetics and Scientology Services
401
10 Dec. 1969 Dianetic Courses, Wildcat (revised reissue of 5 Oct.
1969) 263
ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
12 Sept. 1956 The Summary of a Bulletin from the Academy in
Washington D.C.-Concerning Training
264
3 May 1957 Training-What it is Today
How We Tell People About It (HCOB)
268
21 Jan. 1958 ACCs-HPA/HCA (HCOB)
349
25 Jan. 1958 Inept Students
148
2 Apr. 1958 ARC in Comm Course (HCOB)
149
1 Oct. 1958 HCO Board of Review
269
2 Oct. 1958 Sale and Conduct of Academy Courses
272
9 Oct. 1958 Correction of HCO Policy Letter of October I, 1958
(HCOB) see-271
15 Dec. 1958 Academy Training Curriculum & Examination
274
16 Dec. 1958 Extension Course Curriculum (HCOB)
275
6 Jan. 1959 (Change of HCO Policy Letter of 15 December 1958)
(HCOB) 277
19 Jan. 1959 Extra Weeks on HPA Course
277
10 Mar. 1959 BScn/HCS Course Tapes
Vol. 2-213
8 Apr. 1959 New HPA/HCA Tapes
Vol. 2-214
11 May 1959 HPA/BScn "Retreads"
278
13 Aug. 1959 Students Attending Courses
278
26 Aug. 1959 Promotional Functions of the Academy (excerpt)
131
31 Aug. 1959 Certifications
279
23 Oct. 1959 Academy Training
132
22 Feb. 1960 HPA Qualifications
279
29 Mar. 1960 HGC and Academy Prices for Minors
Vol. 2-260
1 Apr. 1960 Training Requirements-Hubbard Apprentice Scientologist
HPA/HCA-BScn/HCS (HCOB)
280
4 May 1960 Acceptance for ACC and Academy Courses
281
24 May 1960 Extension Course Prices
Vol. 3-227
11 Oct. 1960 Case Assessments for Students
282
2 Nov. 1960 HPA/HCA Course
282
16 Nov. 1960 New Org Programmes
283
xii
17 Nov. 1960 Anatomy of the Human Mind Course as a
Pre-requisite for HPA Training
284
31 Jan. 1961 Academy Meters
134
14 Feb. 1961 The Academy of Scientology (excerpt)
284
27 Feb. 1961 Free Courses
Vol. 3-228
13 Mar. 1961 Free Courses (revises 27 Feb. 1961 )
Vol. 3-228
5 Apr. 1961 HCA/HPA Rundown or Practical Course
Rundown for Academies
285
10 Apr. 1961 HCO Ltd HPA/HCA Certificate Conditions
294
17 Apr. 1961 Training, Professional-New Policy
295
8 May 1961 Extension Course
296
26 May 1961 Modification of HPA/HCA, BScn/HCS Schedule
296
7 June 1961 Academy Schedule, Clarification of (HCOB)
297
23 Aug. 1961 HPA/HCA Policy
299
20 Sept. 1961 Training Policy
299
6 Oct. 1961 Standardized E-Meter Book Exam
300
9 Oct. 1961 Academy Training
302
9 Oct. 1961 HPA/HCA Rundown Change (amends HCOB 7 June 1961)
see-298
23 Oct. 1961 New Rundown for BScn/HCS Course
304
2 Nov. 1961 Allowed Processes from Courses
305
21 Nov. 1961 Training Course Requirements
306
24 Nov. 1961 Saint Hill Tapes for HPA/HCA Courses
306
20 Dec. 1961 Student E-Metering
307
3 Jan. 1962 Upgrading of Auditors
308
3 May 1962 Practical Auditing Skills
309
14 May 1962 Training Sections
311
14 May 1962 Training-Classes of Auditors
313
16 May 1962 HPA/HCA Training
136
21 May 1962 Training-Classes of Auditors (revised from 14 May I962)
315
24 May 1962 Training-Session Cancellation-Auditing Section
318
24 May 1962 Questionnaire
322
5 June 1962 Class II Training only by Academies and Saint Hill
324
7 June 1962 Professional Training to be done in Academy & Saint
Hill Only
324
26 June 1962 Certification Requirements
325
2 July 1962 Rudiments Policy
549
14 July 1962 Auditing Allowed
550
24 July 1962 Academy Extra Weeks
325
30 July 1962 Certification and Validation Requirements
326
9 Aug. 1962 Names and Addresses of Academy Enrollees
Vol. 1-267
1 Sept. 1962 Healing Promotion
556
17 Sept. 1962 An Arrangement of the Academy
327
27 Sept. 1962 Clears Must Be Trained
334
12 Oct. 1962 HPA/HCA Written Examination
334
21 Oct. 1962 Auditing Supervisor and Auditing Instructors, Duties of
335
24 Nov. 1962 Objective One
338
8 Dec. 1962 Training-Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Summary of Subjects by Units
423
13 Feb. 1963 V Unit
427
13 Feb. 1963 Academy Taught Processes
339
23 Mar. 1963 Classification of Auditors-Class II & Goals
340
31 May 1963 Training of Clears (cancels 27 Sept. 1962)
341
10 June 1963 Scientology Training-Technical Studies
342
9 July 1963 HPA/HCA Certificate Check Sheet
342
30 July 1963 Current Planning
344
21 Aug. 1963 Change of Organization Targets-Project 80-A Preview
Vol. 2- 95
22 Apr. 1965 Level 0 Comm Course
346
16 May 1965 Important Explanation-Auditing Restrictions
221
16 May 1965 Academy Courses-General Remarks-Zero Courses
Hubbard Recognized Scientologist
347
17 May 1965 Academy Processing
224
24 May 1965 Student Guide to Acceptable Behaviour
458
18 Oct. 1967 Academy Check Sheets-Supervisor Conditions
201
xiii
ACCs AND SPECIAL COURSES
21 Jan. 1958 ACCs-HPA/HCA (HCOB)
349
27 Nov. 1958 ACC Records
349
2 Jan. 1959 Instructors or HCO Staff-Processing Past ACC Students
349
23 Feb. 1960 ACC Files
350
24 Feb. 1960 ACC Hats
351
23 Mar. 1960 ACC Supervisor Hat
354
4 May 1960 Acceptance for ACC and Academy Courses
354
21 Dec. 1960 Curriculum for ACCs-January 1961
355
12 Sept. 1961 Curriculum for Clearing Courses
356
28 Dec. 1961 Clearing Courses
359
2 Sept. 1969 Old ACC Students
359
CLASS AND GRADE PROGRAMME
(Earlier materials on the Class and Grade Programme are
covered in sections on Academy, SHSBC and HGC,)
26 Nov. 1963 Certificate and Classification Changes-Everyone
Classified 360
6 Dec. 1963 Org Programming
363
11 Dec. 1963 Classification for Everyone (amends 26 Nov. 1963)
364
13 Feb. 1964 Classification
365
23 Feb. 1964 Classification
366
24 Feb. 1964 Org Programming
367
22 Apr. 1964 Summary of Policies on Classification & Gradation,
Certification, Franchise and Memberships, and the
Auditors Division
369
5 May 1964 Summary of Classification and Gradation and
Certification 373
18 June 1964 Professional Route Classification Requirements
(addenda to 5 May 1964)
378
30 July 1964 Gradation Programme, Revised
379
23 Sept. 1964 Auditing and Training Policies (excerpt)
40
11 Dec. 1964 Full Table of Courses and Classification
380
17 Mar. 1965 Clearing and Training
383
14 Apr. 1965 Classification on GPMs
454
5 May 1965 Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart
(reissued 4 July 1970)
384
10 May 1965 Releases-Vital Data (revised & reissued 19 Sept. 1967)
387
28 June 1965 Releases, Different Kinds (HCOB)
389
5 Aug. 1965 Release Stages (HCOB)
390
23 Aug. 1965 Classification at Upper Levels-Temporary Measure
392
30 Aug. 1965 Release Stages (HCOB)
393
22 Sept. 1965 Release Gradation-New Levels of Release (HCOB)
395
27 Sept. 1965 Release Gradation-Additional Data (HCOB)
(Supplements HCOB 22 Sept. 1965)
398
19 Sept. 1967 Releases-Vital Data (revised reissue of 10 May 1965)
387
2 Sept. 1969 Triple Grades
Vol. 2-294
17 Nov. 1969 Dianetics and Scientology Services
(cancels 5 May 1969, 17 May 1969 & 26 Oct. 1969)
401
10 May 1970 Single Declare (cancels 6 Aug. 1966)
403
4 July 1970 Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart
(reissue of 5 May 1965)
384
xiv
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
9 July 1962 Special Briefing Course
404
12 Nov. 1962 Purpose of the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
405
20 Dec. 1960 Restriction on Saint Hill Area
see-409
11 May 1961 Student Training-Auditing has Priority
405
18 Oct. 1961 Examinations
406
25 Oct. 1961 New Students Sec Check
406
6 Dec. 1961 Saint Hill Training-Candidates from Organizations
407
12 Dec. 1961 Training Activities
408
19 Dec. 1961 Saint Hill Retreads
see-410
7 Feb. 1962 Restriction on Saint Hill Area (amends 20 Dec. 1960)
409
13 Feb. 1962 3D Criss Cross Items
409
14 Feb. 1962 Saint Hill Retreads (amends 19 Dec. 1961)
410
12 Mar. 1962 Staff Training
410
25 Apr. 1962 Hat of Course Administrator
see-121
14 May 1962 Training Sections
311
14 May 1962 Training-Classes of Auditors
313
21 May 1962 Training-Classes of Auditors (revised from 14 May 1962)
315
24 May 1962 Training-Session Cancellation-Auditing Section
318
5 June 1962 Class II Training only by Academies and Saint Hill
324
5 July 1962 Course Rotation
411
9 July 1962 Mimeo and Magazine Distribution, Sthil Course
411
9 July 1962 Special Briefing Course
404
19 July 1962 Clearing-Free Needles
552
12 Sept. 1962 Saint Hill Graduates
412
20 Sept. 1962 Co-Audit Unit
413
27 Sept. 1962 Pay for Goals Finding
414
28 Sept. I962 Saint Hill Briefing Course Terminations
414
2 Oct. 1962 Termination & Classification
415
3 Oct. 1962 Rooms, Emptying for Cleaning
417
21 Oct. 1962 Auditing Supervisor and Auditing Instructors, Duties of
335
28 Oct. 1962 Z Unit-Case Review
417
28 Oct. 1962 Co-Audit Suspended
418
8 Nov. 1962 Departure Form
418
12 Nov. 1962 Purpose of the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
405
14 Nov. 1962 Terminations from the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course 420
23 Nov. 1962 Saint Hill Retread Fee
420
1 Dec. 1962 V Unit-New Students-Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
421
6 Dec. 1962 Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
422
8 Dec. 1962 Training-Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Summary of Subjects by Units
423
8 Feb. 1963 Curriculum Change
424
9 Feb. 1963 Saint Hill Course Goals
425
11 Feb. 1963 Auditing Regulations
426
13 Feb. 1963 V Unit
427
14 Feb. 1963 Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Reimbursement Arrangements
Vol. 3-291
23 Mar. 1963 Classification of Auditors-Class II & Goals
340
29 Mar. 1963 Clear Requirement
429
2 Apr. 1963 Food and Cleaning Regulations for Students
430
5 Apr. 1963 Organization Students on Saint Hill Course
431
22 Apr. 1963 Hat of Course Administrator
121
5 May 1963 Staff Member Enrolments
Vol. 3-292
18 June 1963 Students Blowing
432
23 July 1963 Retreads on Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
432
2 Aug. 1963 Saint Hill Course Changes
433
xv
25 Sept. 1963 Hats of Student Instructors for SHSBC
168
8 Oct. 1963 New Saint Hill Certificates and Course Changes
434
24 Jan. 1964 Case Supervisor
435
20 Feb. 1964 Regulations-Course (excerpt)
436
2 Apr. 1964 To the Saint Hill Student: Instruction Targets
437
2 Apr. 1964 Use of Recreation Facilities, 1964
438
2 Apr. 1964 Saint Hill Enrolment-Materials, Courses,
and Use of Class VI Processes
439
17 Apr. 1964 Food and Cleaning Regulations for Students
442
8 May 1964 Transport
443
13 May 1964 Transport (adds to 8 May 1964)
443
25 May 1964 Instructor's Conference Report Form
444
11 June 1964 New Students Data
445
i6 Sept. 1964 Terminations
447
18 Sept. 1964 Final Classification on Termination from Saint Hill
447
13 Nov. 1964 Provisional Class VI Classification (cancels 18 Sept.
1964) 448
27 Feb. 1965 Course Pattern
449
17 Mar. 1965 Faculty Meeting Report
452
2 Apr. 1965 Star-Rate Checkouts for Process (modification of 27
Feb.
1965)
453
13 Apr. 1965 Course R6 Auditing
454
14 Apr. 1965 Classification on GPMs
454
14 Apr. 1965 Organization GPM Unit
455
23 Apr. 1965 Correction to HCO Policy Letter of April 14, AD 15
Organization GPM Unit
see-455
13 May 1965 SHSBC Unit-Graduation
457
17 May 1965 Academy Processing
224
24 May 1965 Student Guide to Acceptable Behaviour
458
3 June 1965 R6 EW
461
28 July 1965 Course R6 Auditing
462
6 Aug. 1965 Technical Queries from R6 Graduates
462
1 Sept. 1965 Saint Hill Services and Prices
Vol. 3-235
14 Sept. 1965 Classification Required Before Moving to Next Level
463
14 Oct. 1965 Course Pattern (amends 27 Feb. 1965)
464
19 Oct. 1965 Release Declarations
597
12 Nov. 1965 Transfers from SHSBC to Solo Audit Course
474
10 Feb. 1966 Check Sheets, Course
466
9 May 1966 Requirements for a SHSBC Supervisor
Vol. 1-117
17 Aug. 1966 Routing and Handling of SHSBC Students
468
13 Sept. 1966 Requirement for Termination on the SHSBC
and Enrolment on Solo Course
468
5 Oct. 1966 Students Terminating-Leave of Absence-Blown Students
469
12 Oct. 1966 Duration of SHSBC and Solo Course Requirements
470
30 Dec. 1966 What the SHSBC Student Needs to Know about Foundation
471
22 Sept. 1967 Solo Auditing Folders
475
27 Nov. 1967 R 6 Materials
475
24 Feb. 1968 Fast Flow for SHSBC Students' Preclears (amends 30 Dec.
1966) 472
11 Dec. 1969 Training of Clears
Vol. 2-299
SOLO AUDIT COURSE
25 Oct. 1965 Saint Hill Solo Audit Course
473
12 Nov. 1965 Transfers from SHSBC to Solo Audit Course
474
28 Dec. 1965 Enrollment in Suppressive Groups see Vol. 1-484,
Vol. 2-284
13 Sept. 1966 Requirement for Termination on the SHSBC
and Enrolment on Solo Course
468
5 Oct. 1966 Students Terminating-Leave of Absence-Blown Students
469
12 Oct. 1966 Duration of SHSBC and Solo Course Requirements
470
22 Sept. 1967 Solo Auditing Folders
475
27 Nov. 1967 R 6 Materials
475
29 June 1968 Enrollment in Suppressive Groups
(amends 28 Dec. 1965) Vol. 1-484,
Vol. 2-284
xvi
ADVANCED COURSES
Clearing Course - OT Courses
(Policy Letters which give technical data belonging solely to
Solo
and above are found in the hats and course materials for those
levels.)
13 Dec. 1965 Staff on Saint Hill Clearing Course
476
28 Dec. 1965 Enrollment in Suppressive Groups see
Vol. 1-484
13 Jan. 1966 Regulations for Auditing of Staff and Students
476
3 Feb. 1966 Clearing Course-Submission of Folders
477
3 Feb. 1966 Clearing Course-Weekly Auditing Hours
477
13 Mar. 1966 Amnesty
478
29 Apr. 1966 Ethics: Clearing Course
478
9 May 1966 Bonuses Adjusted
Vol. 3-206
4 Aug. 1966 Ethics-Clears, Invalidation of
479
8 Aug. 1966 OT Colour Flash-Colour Flash Addition
479
12 Aug. 1966 OT Course
see-483
12 Aug. 1966 The Operating Thetan Course
480
16 Aug. 1966 Clearing Course Security
480
22 Aug. 1966 Bonuses Adjusted (amendment & addition to 9 May 1966)
Vol. 3-207
28 Sept. 1966 Clearing and OT Course Regulations
Clearing and OT Course Case Supervision
see-487
30 Sept. 1966 Clearing and OT Course Regulations
see-487
14 Oct. 1966 Clearing Course Folders (cancels 3 Feb. 1966)
481
7 Nov. 1966 Clear Check-outs in Continental Orgs
482
10 Nov, 1966 Clearing Course and OT Course Materials
see-492
14 Nov. 1966 OT Course (replaces 12 Aug. 1966)
483
16 Dec. 1966 Clearing Course Regulation
483
17 Jan. 1967 An Open Letter to All Clears
484
11 Apr. 1967 Section III OT Prerequisite
485
26 Apr. 1967 Staff on Saint Hill Advanced Courses
485
1 May 1967 Advanced Courses Administration
486
6 July 1967 Advanced Courses Supervisors' Statistic
486
12 Sept. 1967 Clearing and OT Course Regulations
Clearing and OT Course Supervision
(replaces 30 Sept. 1966 & combines it with 28 Sept.
1966) 487
12 Nov. 1967 Clearing and OT Course Regulations (continues 30 Sept.
1966) 488
21 Nov. 1967 Additional Policies on Advanced Courses Security
489
27 Nov. 1967 Bonuses Adjusted (addition to 17 Oct. 1966,
cancels 22 Aug. 1966)
Vol. 3-211
9 Jan. 1968 Cancellation of HCO Policy Letter of 12 Sept. 1967
and HCO Policy Letter of 13 Sept. 1967
491
28 Jan. 1968 Cancellation
see-490
2 Mar. 1968 Advanced Course-Security Check
Vol. 1-476
29 June 1968 Enrollment in Suppressive Groups
(amends 28 Dec. 1965) Vol. 1-484,
Vol. 2-284
16 Dec. 1968 Security Div 1
Vol. 1-490
3 Dec. 1969 Solo Auditing and Pregnancy
491
11 Dec. 1969 Training of Clears
Vol. 2-299
11 Aug. 1971 Advanced Courses Materials-Security of Data
(replaces 10 Nov. 1966)
492
CLASS VIII COURSE
28 Oct. 1968 Classified Materials
493
3 Sept. 1969 Successful Class VIIIs
493
26 Oct. 1969 Class VIII & HDG
494
15 Nov. 1969 Class VIII Retread
Vol. 3-239
28 Nov. 1969 Class VIII Retread (15 Nov. 1969 corrected)
Vol. 3-239
16 Jan. 1970 Class VIII Requirement
494
20 Jan. 1970 Class VIII Retread
(corrects 28 Nov. 1969 & 15 Nov. 1969)
Vol. 3-242
xvii
DEPARTMENT TWELVE
DEPARTMENT OF PROCESSING
HUBBARD GUIDANCE CENTER
HGC AUDITORS
(A study of this Department should include the
Class and Grade Programme, pages 360-403.)
14 Feb. 1961 The Pattern of a Central Organization
(excerpt: The Hubbard Guidance Centre)
6
20 May 1954 Atmosphere of the Clinic (extract from Clinical
Procedure) 495
20 May 1954 The Auditors of the Clinic (extract from Clinical
Procedure) 495
26 Sept. 1956 Registrar (Org Bulletin)
495
26 Sept. 1956 Procedure for Putting Auditors on Staff (Org Bulletin)
496
15 Nov. 1956 HGC Preclear Complaints (HCOB)
496
7 May 1957 Assignment of Auditors, Rooms, Students
22
13 May 1957 Financial Enrollment Procedure
129
17 May 1957 The Hubbard Guidance Center
496
1 June 1957 Rights of the Directors of Training & Processing, Staff
Auditors
& Instructors regarding Preclears & Students (HCO Info
Bull.) 23
10 June 1957 What to Tell New HGC Auditors to Process on Preclears
(HCO Processing Bulletin)
497
10 July 1957 Hiring of Staff Auditors
497
2 Sept. 1957 Verbal Directions from LRH (HCOB)
497
5 Sept. 1957 All preclears are expected to...
498
16 Sept. 1957 HGC Policy
498
16 Sept. 1957 Hubbard Guidance Centre-Use of Title (HASI Staff
Notice) 498
8 Feb. 1958 Since people will begin to expect being cleared...
499
4 Mar. 1958 Addition to HASI Policy Letter of Feb. 8, 1958 (HCOB)
499
6 May 1958 Modified Procedure for Signing up Prospective
Students & Pcs (Admin Directive)
130
9 July 1958 Staff Clearing (HCOB)
500
25 Nov. 1958 Techniques to be Used on HGC Preclears
500
23 Dec. 1958 Qualifications of HGC Staff Auditors
501
31 Dec. 1958 Routing of Profiles (HCO Sec'l Letter)
502
30 Apr. 1959 Additional Staff Auditors
116
2 June 1959 Correction of HCO Policy Letter of 23 December 1958
Qualification of HGC Staff Auditors
501
19 Aug. 1959 Writing of Letters by Staff Auditors
Vol. 2-365
26 Aug. 1959 Promotional Functions of the HGC (excerpt)
503
3 Sept. 1959 Director of Processing-Hat (Sec'l ED)
504
9 Oct. 1959 Staff Auditors
512
16 Oct. 1959 Handling Students' and Auditors' Reports (HCOB)
512
16 Oct. 1959 How to Prepare HGC Weekly Reports for Review
513
27 Oct. 1959 Processing of Children on the HGC
Vol 3-226
1 Jan. 1960 Administrative Procedure for Reducing Overts
514
22 Jan. 1960 Requirements for HGC Auditors
515
29 Mar. 1960 HGC and Academy Prices for Minors
(cancels & replaces 27 Oct. 1959)
Vol. 2-260
2 June 1960 Requirements for Staff Posts.
Vol. 1-123
19 Aug. 1960 Registrar Lost Line
516
17 Sept. 1960 Giving the Pc Full Hours
517
14 Nov. 1960 Sign Up of Students & Pcs-Acceptance by D/P & D/T
(excerpt) 24
15 Nov. 1960 Staff Certificate Requirements
220
19 Nov, 1960 Pc Scheduling
117
22 Nov. 1960 There will be no professional rates... (SA only)
Vol. 3-249
10 Jan. 1961 A Brief Outline of an HGC as Currently Done
518
30 Jan. 196i Case Files
117
14 Feb. 1961 The Pattern of a Central Organization
(excerpt: The Hubbard Guidance Centre)
6
27 Feb. 1961 Free Courses
Vol. 3-228
xviii
6 Mar. 1961 Restriction on SOP Goals Procedure
518
20 Mar. 1961 Basic Staff Auditor's Hat
519
24 Mar. 1961 HGC Admin Partial Hat-Staff Auditor Assignment
118
31 Mar. 1961 The Director of Processing's Case Checking Hat
525
5 Apr. 1961 SOP Goals Goofs
531
25 Apr. 1961 D of P Form-Check Type One (modifies 31 Mar. 1961)
532
10 May 1961 Staff Auditors
534
24 May 1961 SOP Goals Assessments
535
26 May 1961 Basic Staff Auditor's Hat (refers to 20 Mar. 1961)
536
24 Aug. 1961 HGC Allowed Processes
536
29 Sept. 1961 HGC Allowed Processes
537
23 Oct. 1961 E-Meters to be Approved
Vol. 2-228
27 Oct. 1961 Professional Rates Restored
Vol. 3-250
21 Nov. 1961 HGC Processing Liability
539
29 Nov. 1961 Class of Auditors (adds to 29 Sept. 1961)
541
28 Dec. 1961 HGC Allowed Processes
543
5 Jan. 1962 Reports from HGCs
544
17 Jan. 1962 Responsibility Again (reissued 7 June 1967)
546
22 Jan. 1962 Security Checks
547
17 May 1962 Rudiments Checks
547
29 May 1962 Professional Rates (adds to 27 Oct. 1961)
Vol. 3-251
1 June 1962 Auditing-Rudiments Check Sheet
548
2 July 1962 Rudiments Policy
549
14 July 1962 Auditing Allowed
550
19 July 1962 Clearing-Free Needles
552
13 Aug. 1962 Clearing
553
28 Aug. 1962 How to Write an Auditor's Report
554
1 Sept. 1962 Healing Promotion
556
12 Sept. 1962 Authorized Processes
557
27 Sept. 1962 Clears Must Be Trained
334
27 Sept. 1962 Valid Processes
558
8 Oct. 1962 HGC Clearing
559
16 Oct. 1962 Auditing Hours Limited
562
15 Jan. 1963 Routine 2-12
563
21 Feb. 1963 Urgent-Goals Check
564
6 Mar. 1963 Selling Techniques Forbidden
Vol. 2-325
11 Apr. 1963 Goals Finding and Goal Finders
564
13 Apr. 1963 Policy of HGCs
565
31 May 1963 Training of Clears (cancels 27 Sept. 1962)
341
18 Mar. 1964 HGC Allowed Processes
566
21 Aug. 1964 Staff Auditors (reissued ? June 1967)
567
28 Sept. 1964 Clay Table Use
568
5 Apr. 1965 Handling the Suppressive Person-The Basis of Insanity
53
5 Apr. 1965 The No-Gain-Case Student
61
19 Apr. 1965 Training and Processing Regulations
Technical Discipline-Students' Questions
65
17 May 1965 Free Scientology Centre
222
23 May 1965 Rebates
569
27 May 1965 Processing
570
14 June 1965 Folders, Marking of
571
17 June 1965 Staff Auditor Advices
601
4 July 1965 Pc Routing-Review Code
603
6 July 1965 Releases
571
7 July 1965 Releases, Policy on
71
12 July 1965 Release Policies-Starting the Pc
572
19 July 1965 Release Checks, Procedure for
574
19 July 1965 Separation Order
605
30 July 1965 Preclear Routing to Ethics
606
24 Aug. 1965 Pcs Released Routing
606
19 Nov. 1965 Auditing Reports
577
30 Dec. 1965 PTS Auditing and Routing
578
1 Feb. 1966 Staff Auditor and Supervisor Procurement
80
xix
1 Feb. 1966 HGC Cure-Interne Training and Staff Auditors
78
18 Oct. 1966 SH Staff Auditor's Purpose
579
7 June 1967 Staff Auditors (reissue of 21 Aug. 1964)
567
7 June 1967 Responsibility Again (reissue of 17 Jan. 1962)
546
4 Oct. 1967 Auditor and Org Individual Stats
10
26 Aug. 1968 Security Checks Abolished
Vol. 1-486
14 Oct. 1968 The Auditor's Code AD 18
111
2 Nov. 1968 Auditor's Code-Add to Pol Ltr 14 October AD 18
see-112
23 July 1969 Auditor Assignment Policies
127
15 Nov. 1969 Rights and Duties
98
17 Apr. 1970 An Auditor and "The Mind's Protection"
580
8 June 1970 Student Auditing (cancels 29 Oct. 1965, 23 May 1969 II,
17 May 1965 & 17 May 1965 II)
227
5 Mar. 197I The Fantastic New HGC Line (HCOB)
581
6 Mar. 1971 Line Design-HGC Lines, An Example
585
25 Aug. 1971 How to Get Results in an HGC (HCOB)
586
28 Sept. 1971 Selling and Delivering Auditing
589
POWER PROCESSING
28 Apr. 1965 Power Processes
593
10 May 1965 Releases-Vital Data (revised & reissued 19 Sept. 1967)
387
20 May 1965 Power Processes
595
21 May 1965 Memorandum of Agreement
Vol. 2-270
14 June 1965 Six Power Processes
596
5 July 1965 Memorandum of Agreement
(correction to 21 May 1965) see
Vol. 2-270
23 July 1965 Priority of Power Processing
Vol. 2-272
20 Aug. 1965 Continuing Pc to Third Stage Release
596
20 Sept. 1965 Power Processing for the Public see
Vol. 2-272
21 Sept. 1965 Memorandum of Agreement (amends 21 May 1965)
Vol. 2-274
19 Oct. 1965 Release Declarations
597
30 Nov. 1965 Power Processing for the Public (replaces 20 Sept.
1965)
Vol. 2-272
6 Apr. 1971 Power Badges
597
CASE SUPERVISOR
24 Jan. 1964 Case Supervisor
435
24 Feb. 1964 Rundown of Case Supervisor Hat
598
24 Feb. 1964 Technical Supervision Changes
38
24 Feb. 1964 Nomination of Case Supervisor
600
14 June 1965 Folders, Marking of
600
17 June 1965 Staff Auditor Advices
601
4 July 1965 Pc Routing-Review Code
603
19 July 1965 Separation Order
605
28 July 1965 Case Supervisor, Special Attention
605
30 July 1965 Preclear Routing to Ethics
606
24 Aug. 1965 Pcs Released Routing
606
1 Feb. 1966 HGC Cure-Interne Training and Staff Auditors
78
29 Oct. 1968 Class VIII C/S Qual Stat
607
17 Jan. 1969 Pc Attestations
607
20 May 1969 Keeping Dianetics Working in an Area (HCOB)
245
15 Nov. 1969 Rights and Duties
98
19 Jan. 1970 Registrars' Advice Form (HCOB)
Vol. 2-339
4 Feb. 1970 Pc Application Form for any Major Auditing Action
Vol. 2-341
4 Feb. 1970 Pc Application for Major Actions (HCOB)
Vol. 2-343
5 Mar. 1971 The Fantastic New HGC Line (HCOB)
581
6 Mar. 1971 Line Design-HGC Lines, An Example
585
xx
Appendix
OUTSIDE AUDITING
20 May 1957 Outside Auditing
608
9 July 1957 Private Preclears of HASI Staff
Auditing Limit (Assoc Sec Directlye)
608
26 July 1957 Funds or Favors Received
608
11 Apr. 1958 Staff Members' Outside Auditing Regulation (HCOB)
609
27 May 1958 Outside Auditing
609
2 Jan. 1959 Instructors or HCO Staff-Processing Past Ace Students
349
29 Oct. 1959 Processing of Academy Students
219
1 Apr. 1960 Regulations for Staff Members and ex-Staff Members
610
29 Feb. 1961 Outside Pcs of Staff Members
611
21 June 1962 Staff Members Auditing Private Pcs
611
16 Oct, 1962 Auditing Hours Limited
562
21 Mar. 1965 Staff Members Auditing Outside Pcs
Vol. 1-586
29 Mar. 1965 Excerpts from HCO Policy Letter of November 9, 1964
and November 26, 1964 (revised) for Staff Hats
Vol. 1-587
13 Jan. 1966 Regulations for Auditing of Staff and Students
476
Note: The materials in this volume are listed mainly in
order of appearance. Additionally, some policies are
listed
in more than one section (with page numbers in
italics), as
they deal with more than one area of operation.
Relevant policies from other OEC volumes are also
listed, with volume and page numbers in italics.
A complete date order index appears in the back of the
book, starting on page 612.
xxi
YOUR POST
A post in a Scientology Organization isn't a job.
It's a trust and a crusade.
We're free men and women-probably the last free
men and women on Earth. Remember, we'll have to
come back to Earth some day no matter what
"happens" to us.
If we don't do a good job now we may never get
another chance.
Yes, I'm sure that's the way it is.
So we have an organization, we have a field we
must support, we have a chance.
That's more than we had last time night's curtain
began to fall on freedom.
So we're using that chance.
An organization such as ours is our best chance to
get the most done. So we're doing it!
L. RON HUBBARD
xxii
org board section graphic
1
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 NOVEMBER 1967
Remimeo
HCO Exec Sec Hat
Org Exec Sec Hat
Tech Sec Hat
Dept of Tech Services Hats
Dept of Processing Hats
Dept of Training Hats
TECH DIVISION, DEPARTMENTS OF
TECH SERVICES, TRAINING, AND PROCESSING
All Organization Boards are to be posted in accordance with the
following line-
up which complies with HCO Policy Letter of February 28, 1966
entitled, "Danger
Condition Data, Why Organizations Stay Small":
DEPARTMENT OF TECH SERVICES
Director of Tech Services
TECH ROUTING SECTION
Tech Routing Administrator
Tech Pages
STUDENT ADMINISTRATION SECTION
Student Administrator
Student Unit and Level Log Clerk
Student Materials Supply Clerk
Student Location Clerk
Student Files Clerk
Student Pc Files Clerk
HGC ADMINISTRATION SECTION
HGC Administrator
HGC Pc Assignment Clerk
HGC Room Assignment Clerk
HGC Priority List Clerk
HGC Pc Location Clerk
HGC Files Clerk
SERVICE SECTION
Service Administrator
Information Clerk
Housing Clerk
Transportation Clerk
Passport Clerk
Student/Pc Comm Courier
TECH RESERVATIONS UNIT
Tech Reservations Administrator
Letter Typists
DEPARTMENT OF TRAINING
Director of Training
BASIC COURSES SECTION
Basic Courses Chief Supervisor
HAS Supervisor
HQS Supervisor
Dianetic Co-Audit Supervisor
2
ACADEMY COURSES SECTION
Academy Courses Chief Supervisor
Dianetic Auditor Course Supervisor
Level 0 Supervisor
Level I Supervisor
Level II Supervisor
Level III Supervisor
Level IV Supervisor
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE SECTION
(Saint Hill only)
SHSBC Chief Supervisor
Unit A Supervisor
Unit B Supervisor
Unit C Supervisor
SOLO SECTION (Saint Hill only)
Solo Course Chief Supervisor
Unit D Supervisor (Class VI)
Solo Audit Course Supervisor (Grade VI)
ADVANCED COURSES SECTION (WW only)
Advanced Courses Chief Supervisor
Clearing Course Supervisor
Asst Clearing Course Supervisor
OT Course Supervisor
Asst OT Course Supervisor
DEPARTMENT OF PROCESSING
Director of Processing
CASE SUPERVISION SECTION
Case Supervisor
SECTION A AUDITORS
Section A Leading Auditors
Auditors
SECTION B AUDITORS
Section B Leading Auditor
Auditors
SECTION C AUDITORS
Section C Leading Auditor
Auditors
INTERN AUDITOR SECTION
Leading Intern Auditor
Intern Auditors
Note that only the services actually delivered in your Department of
Training
are to be posted. Only Saint Hill would post the SHSBC and only WW
would post
Advanced Courses.
Mary Sue
Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
3
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 NOVEMBER 1959
[Excerpt]
CenOCon
KEY TO THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
OF THE FOUNDING CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF WASHINGTON DC
TECHNICAL DIVISION
Purpose: To ensure good training and processing, good service and ARC
inside and
outside the organization.
ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
Purpose: To train the best auditors in the world.
TRAINING ADMINISTRATOR
Purpose: To keep the materials and comm lines of the Academy good
order. To
keep a Roll Book. To prepare and collect certification materials.
HUBBARD CLEARING SCIENTOLOGIST COURSE
Purpose: To educate auditors the techniques and skills necessary to
clear human
beings.
COMMUNICATION COURSE
Purpose: To give people a reality on Scientology and to teach the
communication
formula by Dummy Auditing.
UPPER INDOCTRINATION COURSE
Purpose: To attain ability to handle bodies, objects and intentions
fully.
THEORY & PRACTICE COURSE
Purpose: To create a competent auditor with a good grasp of theory and
practice
of Scientology. All five levels of Indoc.
HUBBARD GUIDANCE CENTRE
Purpose: To do more for people's health and ability than has ever
before been
possible and to give the best auditing possible. To help people.
PROCESSING ADMINISTRATOR
Purpose: To handle the persons, communications and materials of the
HGC to the
end of improving and continuing the quality and business of the HGC.
SCIENTOMETRIC TESTING IN CHARGE
Purpose' To give all and any tests or exams that may be required to
any
department or organization or personnel, and to keep and file results
accurately
to assist research and presentation, and to have test materials
abundance to
hand.
PERSONAL EFFICIENCY FOUNDATION
Purpose: To run an amazingly successful HAS Co-Audit Course, to keep
new people
coming in and the Co-Audit growing, at least five new people per week,
and cases
cracked and everyone to get trained further or cleared fully in the
HGC.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.rd
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The full Policy Letter is given in Volume 7,
page 138.]
4
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1961
(Excerpt)
Cen Orgs
Copy for each
Staff Hat
Not for Franchise
PATTERN OF A CENTRAL ORGANIZATION
TECHNICAL DIVISION
The Personal Efficiency Foundation
The PE Foundation is the entrance door of the public into the services
of the
Central Organization, a knowledge of Scientology and a higher level of
civilization.
Test Section
By means of advertising mailings and word of mouth, the public is
brought in to
be tested and evaluated. This is done by the Test Section of the PE
Foundation.
This section does everything possible to route new individuals into a
PE Course.
PE Course Section
A five evening PE Course is given weekly. Its curriculum is precisely
laid down.
Its total purpose is to explain elementary Scientology and prepare and
route
people into the Co-audit.
The HAS Co-audit Section
Using precise processes developed for this section only, the HAS Co-
audit (Do it
Yourself Processing) seeks to improve cases and further interest
people in
Scientology so that they will take individual HGC processing and
individual
training.
Summary of the PE Foundation
The PE Foundation is an entrance point to Scientology. If it fails to
pass
people from testing to a PE Course, from a PE Course to Co-audit and
from Co-
audit to the Academy and HGC then it is failing its functions, the
unit will be
low and the Central Organization faltering.
No section of the PE is an end-all where the public feels an action
has been
completed. That the PE Foundation in itself does a great deal of good
is
indisputable. However, the moment it relaxes on this fact and fails to
pass
people along, it lets down every staff member in the other five
departments as
well as its own people. A PE Foundation income is not adequate to
support even
itself, and its services in training and processing are not wholly
adequate to
functioning in life. It is an entrance door. It must be alertly
watched. Its
numbers in testing, PE Course and Co-audit today are the
organization's units
and Scientology's people tomorrow.
The PE Director is now, next to the Assn Secretary, the most
responsible person
for solvency in a Central Organization.
The Academy of Scientology
Headed by the Director of Training, the Academy is responsible for the
technical
excellence of Scientology practice tomorrow.
Teaching two different courses in the same classes, the Academy trains
Hubbard
Practical Scientologists and Hubbard Professional (HPA (HCA) Auditors.
The Academy also teaches an upper level course once or more a year
known as the
B.Scn (Hubbard Clearing Scientologist) Course.
5
Precise scheduling, crisp training and true, direct answers to the
students'
questions makes an Academy.
The HPA/HCA Course enrolls more or less every Monday unless the total
average
unit is to be gained expensively through individual processing only.
The Practical course is the same as the old professional course except
that it
is for people "Who don't want to practice Scientology professionally".
The
professional course is a tougher version with more requirements.
A bad Academy results in a bad HGC tomorrow as many graduates become
staff
auditors.
A good Academy is known by its snappy scheduling and the degree of
basic data
and action the student actually absorbs.
The Hubbard Guidance Centre
The HGC is headed by the Director of Processing, under whom come all
individual
cases, (public and staff).
The D ofP is the case czar of the organization.
The D of P's total administration is done by HGC Admin. The D of P
does not do
admin, only technical, but is in charge of admin and all staff
auditors and the
department.
The D of P (or case of more than 30 pcs/week, a deputy D of P)
interviews HGC
cases every five hours of processing to establish the quality of goals
and
rudiments and what the auditor is running.
HGC Admin procures and assigns auditors, gives applicants from the
Registrar
their case estimates, keeps the files of cases, oversees proper
auditor handling
of forms, oversees testing or gets it done for HGC pcs when PE testing
is
closed, finds and assigns rooms for auditing and keeps, in general,
the lines
moving in the HGC.
If the D of P does these things or worse, takes preclears to process,
you don't
have an HGC. You have a technical collapse.
HGC quality must be high and stay high. It is the highest technical
quality in
the continent.
An HGC staff auditor audits directly on current run-down and produces
high case
gains. HGC Staff Auditors are the most respected auditors in
Scientology and for
a period of 11 years have always gotten the highest, fastest results
in
Dianetics and Scientology. A staff auditor may refuse to process or
refuse to
release from processing any pc.
The HGC was born to show field auditors the results that could be
obtained, and
lived on to carry the full burden of successful auditing around the
world.
Technical Report Forms
A report by each student is required each week by the D of T.
A report for each session given a pc is required from staff auditors
by the D
of P. These are "reports to LRH".
All these are ultimately received by HCO WW.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:aec.js.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The full Policy Letter is given in Volume 7,
page 147.]
6
THE PROMOTIONAL ACTIONS
OF TECHNICAL DIVISION 4
(From HCO PL 20 November 1965, The Promotional Actions
of an Organization, with the deletion of 71 per HCO PLs
15 December 1965 and 4 February 1966 These are given
complete
for all divisions ill Basic Staff Volume 0, starting on
page 84.)
51. TECHNICAL SECRETARY - Co-ordinates and gets done the promotional
functions of Division 4.
52. DEPARTMENT 10 (Dept of Tech Services) - Makes the customers happy
and
glad to be there.
53. Gives brisk service.
54. Acquires for the org a reputation for swift and excellent
handling of
people.
55. DEPARTMENT II (Dept of Training) - Gives excellent training. (The
soundest possible promotion quickly mirrored in numbers
enrolling.)
56. Routes dissidents quickly to Ethics and slows to Review.
57. Briskly and punctually schedules classes.
58. Accomplishes lots of completions.
59. Turns out very competent auditors whose excellence promotes the
Academy
(or College at SH) and Scientology.
60. Writes letters to possible prospective students to get the
Academy (or
College at SH) full. (This is an old, old activity of the D of T
who
never depends on Registrars or magazines.)
61. Makes sure the excellence of training that is there is bragged
about in
magazines, etc.
62. Gets students (Free Scientology Centre) to find new, raw meat pcs
of their
own around the town and audit them for student classification and
gets them
to bring such pcs in for Release examinations and declarations
(during
which they get routed through Registrar who presents the award)
and refuses
any for classification ill cases already known to be a paying pc
of some
org or auditor.
63. DEPARTMENT 12 (Dept of Processing) - Gets excellent results on
all pcs.
64. Becomes well known for standard tech.
65. Spots SPs and PTSs early and routes to Ethics. Routes bogged
cases
quickly to Review.
66. Takes responsibility for all cases in the whole area where the
org is
67. Makes auditors look and act professionally outside the HGC so
people will
have confidence in them.
68. Insists on clean, attractive HGC quarters and helps Materiel to
achieve and
maintain them.
69. Gets pcs in such good shape they are walking advertisements for
the HGC
and Scientology.
70. Writes letters to possible pcs (the D of P has had this duty for
15 years).
71. [Deleted per HCO PLs 15 Dec '65 and 4 Feb '66. Now appears as
85a.]
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
7
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1965
[Excerpt]
Remimeo
Advisory Councils
Advisory Committees
STATISTICS FOR DIVISIONS
Tech Division 4
Number of students and pcs completed in the week.
The number enrolled is really only partly the Tech Division's as if
they give
good service they will get enrollments. However, the completions are
the real
index of a Tech Division and shows up any weakness of the division. So
their
statistic is only total completions of courses and auditing. This of
course
includes graduations from any course and completion of any result for
the pc
that brings a Grade Cert or just ends intensives.
Completed of course means only certified or classed or graded. However
completion of a 25 hour intensive which satisfied the pc (no review at
end even
if one occurred before the end) counts as a pc completed. Five hour
rehabs which
did not result in a Grade are not completions. Five Hour assists
bought as
assists are done of course in Qual and so are not a Tech statistic.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Excerpted from HCO P/L 30 September 1965, Statistics for Divisions, a
complete
copy of which is in Volume 1, page 328. Statistics in use for the
Academy and
HGC prior to the 1965 Seven Division Organizing Board evolution are
given in
Volume 1 on pages 318 and 323. The above P/L has been amended by the
following
Policy Letters: HCO P/L 27 April 1967, Tech Division Statistic, page
10;
HCO P/L 22 September 1969, HGC Statistic, page 12; HCO P/L 29 March
1970, Tech
and Qual Stats Revised, in the 1970 Year Book; HCO P/L 17 June 1970
Issue 11,
OIC Change-Cable Change, Volume 1, page 359 (which also cancelled 29
March
1970); HCO P/L 5 February 1971 Issue V, Org Gross Divisional
Statistics Revised,
page 20; and HCO P/L 5 February 1971 Issue Ill, FEBC Executive
Director Org
GDSes, in the 1971 Year Book.]
8
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 OCTOBER 1966
St Hill and
WW only
Gen Non-Remimeo
OIC GRAPHS
Clearing and OT Course
Div IV Statistics, LRH Comm Statistic
Clears and OTs are not counted in the Div IV graph as they give an
improper view
of some Gross Divisional statistics in that they mask Releases
actually made, an
important datum.
The Gross Divisional Tech statistic includes only completions and
Releases made
in Div IV. The HGC graph only includes Releases.
LRH COMM GRAPH
The graph of the LRH Comm and the Office of LRH Gross statistic shall
cease to
be a point system and will be drawn hereafter I for I. All Releases,
Clears and
OTs made are included I for I in these graphs. (OIC, in initially
implementing
this policy, should revise and backdate these figures at least four
weeks to
plot a meaningful line.)
EXECUTIVE DIVISION COURSES
An additional packet of graphs each labelled Exec Div Courses shall be
added to
the SH graphs and included also in the WW graphs to which it actually
belongs.
They are as follows.
GRAPHS OF POST GRADUATE STUDENTS:
Graph 1 - is a dual graph consisting of a straight continuous line
which shows
the number of students on the Clearing Course and a dotted line which
shows the
number of students on the OT Course.
Graph 2 - a continuous line which shows the number of Clears made that
week
(Thursday 2:00 p.m. to Thursday 2:00 p.m.) and a dotted line (when it
comes to
apply) showing the number of OTs made.
POST GRADUATE INCOME GRAPHS:
Graph 3- a line which shows the amount of money received by Saint Hill
for
Clearing Course enrolments.
Graph 4 - a line which shows the amount of money paid in by OT Course
students
for the OT Course.
Graph 5 - a line which shows the amount of money paid into Qual SH for
reviews
by reason of the Clearing Course.
CLEARING COURSE SUPERVISOR STATISTIC
The statistic of the Clearing Course Supervisor will remain the number
of
completions tallied as number of parts completed.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
9
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 APRIL 1967
(Amendment to HCO Policy Letter of 30 Sept 1965,
Gen Non-Remimeo "Statistics For Divisions')
OIC
Tech Sec
Qual Sec
Ad Council
Exec Council
TECH DIVISION STATISTIC
Number of Students completed in the week
Number of Preclears completed in the week.
0
The Tech Completions statistic remains, the only change being that it
is now a
dual statistic of number of student completions and number of preclear
completions for the week. The definition of "completion" remains as
defined 30
Sept 1965 Policy Letter.
It was found by a recent Board of Investigation that a total Tech
completions
statistic looked good, but on a breakdown it was seen that this was
entirely
due to an affluence only in preclear completions while the total
student
completions statistic was actually in a state of collapse. This had
been masked
from Ad Council and Executive Council and not given its proper
importance due to
the condition having been concealed in the total completions
statistic.
Both preclear and student completions statistics are equally
important,
reflecting different areas of the Tech Sec's responsibilities. Each is
half the
product of the org and must be seen as it is. Additionally, a
collapsed student
completions statistic, if unhandled, will eventually lead to a
collapsed gross
cash statistic regardless of any affluences in preclear completions.
So lefs handle these two stats as they are and give preclear
completions and
student completions the individual importance of a dual gross
divisional
statistic for Tech.
This will mean a slight change in the OIC cable.
Written by a Board of
Investigation
David Ziff
Joan Thomas
J.J. Delance
Exec Council WW
Mary Sue Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 OCTOBER 1967
BPI
Auditor
FSMs
AUDITOR AND ORG INDIVIDUAL STATS
The Individual Statistic of any Auditor is
HOW MANY OF HIS PCS HAVE THEREAFTER BEEN TRAINED IN AN ORGANIZATION.
The Individual Statistic of any organization (except SH) is
HOW MANY TRAINED AUDITORS EXIST IN ITS AREA.
The Individual Statistic of Saint Hill is
HOW MANY TRAINED AUDITORS ARE THERE IN THE WORLD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
10
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MARCH 1969
Remimeo
Tech & Qual
Hats
OIC Hats
COMPLETIONS STATISTIC,
TRIPLE GRADES, TECH & QUAL DIVISIONS
A completion is defined in HCO Pol Ltr 30th September, 1965 as
certified or
classed or graded. It is further defined in HCO Pol Ltr 17th October,
1966
Issue 11 as Grade Rehab, S & D, assist or Sec Check.
Since each question of a Triple Grade is considered as a type of
process by
itself which handles not a different Grade (process subject matter)
but a
different flow (aspect) of the subject being addressed, for statistic
purposes
each flow of a Triple Grade should be considered as one PC completion.
David Dunlop Int Tech
Officer WW
Jim Keely Qual Sec WW
Bruce Glushakow HCO Area Sec
WW
Ad Council WW
Rodger Wright LRH Comm WW
Jane Kember Guardian WW
for L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ei.cden
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 APRIL 1969
Refers HCO PL 31 March 69
Remimeo
HCO Policy Letter 31st March 1969, Completions Statistic is herewith
cancelled,
as it
A) Changes the purpose of HCO Policy Letter 30 Sept 65 which states
that a
completion is a grade completed.
B) Would give a possible 4 Bonuses to an Auditor per Auditing Grade.
Proposed by
H.G.
Parkhouse
2 D/G F WW
for
Jane Kember
The
Guardian WW
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ei.cden
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
11
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1969
Remimeo
(Amends HCO Policy Letter of 30 Sept 1965)
(Amends HCO Policy Letter of 31 Mar 1969, II,
Item No. 19)
HGC STATISTIC
The statistic for the HGC and the Tech Division is changed from PC
Completions
to number of successful auditing hours delivered. This is in line with
HCO
Bulletin, 29 July 1969.
TECH DIVISION
The statistic is the number of successful auditing hours
delivered.
Number of student completions.
DEPT OF PROCESSING
The statistic is the number of successful auditing hours
delivered for
the week.
This is the statistic of the D of P and the HGC Case Supervisor
with the HGC Auditor having the same statistic on an individual
basis.
"Successful auditing hours" are judged solely by the thoroughness
and exactness of technical application and are the total of
sessions
for which the Case Supervisor gives the auditor a "well done".
R. C. Ash -- Org Exec Sec
UK
Allan Ferguson -- Qual Sec WW
Rosalie Vosper -- HCO Area Sec
WW
Ad Council WW
Anne Tampion -- HCO Exec Sec
WW
Allan Ferguson -- Org Exec Sec
WW
Tom Morgan -- Public Exec
Sec WW
Rodger Wright -- LRH Comm WW
Leif Windle -- Policy Review
Section WW
Jane Kember -- The Guardian
WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:RA.ei.cden
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
12
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1970
All Div IV Personnel
OES
HCO ES
HCO Area Sec
Dept 3 Hats
DIVISION IV ORG BOARD, IDEAL SCENES AND STATS
Following is the Division IV Org Board with the Sections and Units of
each
Department listed and the Ideal Scene and new Stat given for each.
The Ideal Scene for each post should be studied and thoroughly
understood, as
this is the exact purpose of the post.
The Stats have been worked out precisely so that each one brings about
the Ideal
Scene for its particular post, resulting in a constantly increasing
Star.
The Awareness Levels of the three Departments-Prediction, Activity,
Production
are, of course, exactly right for bringing about the Ideal Scene and
raising
Stats of the Departments, and remain unchanged.
Lt. Cmdr. Joan
Robertson
CS-4
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JR:sb.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
13
TECHNICAL DIVISION THE PRODUCTION DIVISION DIVISION IV
TECHNICAL SECRETARY
Ideal Scene: Large increasing inflow from the area into Div IV
producing
the specific product of the org which is fully audited
pre-
clears and large numbers of well trained graduated
auditors
who are able and willing to audit and train others.
Star: Dual: 1. Total number of well done auditing hours in HGC.
2. Total points of all Students in the Department of
Training
for the week past based on the Flag Authorized Point
System.
DEPARTMENT 10 DEPT OF TECH SERVICES
DIR OF TECH SERVICES
Ideal Scene: Superlative Service to every Student and Preclear and
to
Departments of Training and Processing so that
sufficient
materials, equipment, routing, assignments and admin
are
flawlessly handled resulting in inflow of more Students
and
Preclears.
Stat: Dual: 1. Total number of preclears in the Tech Div for the
week,
minus five for any who blew, were misrouted, left
incomplete,
or on leave and/or who have not been retrieved from
past
blows and misroutes.
2. Total number of students in the Tech Div for the
week minus
five for any who blew, were misrouted, left
incomplete, or on
leave and/or who have not been retrieved from past
blows and
misroutes.
TECH ROUTING SECTION
TECH ROUTING ADMINISTRATOR
Ideal Scene: Flawless routing of bodies and particles so that
Students and
Preclears can get through their services with no
delays.
Stat: Number of bodies routed correctly to completed cycle in
or out
of Tech Div, minus five for any one incorrectly routed
or who
went off lines or was not scheduled after arrival.
TECH PAGES
Ideal Scene: Flawless routing of bodies and particles so that cycles
may be
completed without delay to Staff, Students or
Preclears.
Stat: Number of correctly completed routing cycles-minus five
for any
incomplete or misrouted cycles.
STUDENT ADMIN SECTION
STUDENT ADMINISTRATOR
Ideal Scene: Flawless service to Students and classrooms so that
there is
never a stop on Student or Classroom functions.
Stat: Total number of correctly issued, newly issued or newly
made up
course packs at hand minus 20 for every student on a
course
without all his materials in hand, cumulative until
remedied.
STUDENT UNIT AND LEVEL LOG CLERK
Ideal Scene: Perfect Admin so that the logging reflects one for one
Bodies
present with bodies enrolled.
14
Stat: Total number of correctly logged items minus five for
any
omission or incorrectly logged item and plus ten for
perfect
student attendance during week.
MATERIALS SUPPLY CLERK
Ideal Scene: Sufficient numbers of material and packs for every
student
with some to spare of every item on every checksheet on
the
courses.
Stat: Total number of materials usefully supplied to the
students
and classes minus ten each for any that were missing.
incomplete
or in poor condition.
STUDENT LOCATION CLERK
Ideal Scene: Every student enrolled present and on time at every
roll call
or immediately located, brought in to Ethics and
resumption of
classes.
Stat: Number of students on courses minus 10 for any absence
for each
day, and plus 10 for perfect attendance for the week
STUDENT/PC ASSIGNMENT CLERK
Ideal Scene: Every student comparably twinned, assigned and posted
being
audited and auditing.
Stat: Total number of students correctly twinned and assigned
to co-
audit. minus five for every student omitted. or
incorrectly
assigned or not posted or not twinned.
STUDENT/PC FILES CLERK
Ideal Scene: Every student's file as auditor and pc complete and in
PT as
a perfect record of full auditing and having been
audited.
Stat: Number of correctly filed items for the week minus five
for
every item backlogged, misfiled or omitted and plus ten
for
files in correct order and in PT.
FILES CLERK
Ideal Scene: Course files in PT and excellent order for instant
reference
and data on courses.
Stat: Number of correctly filed items for the week minus five
for
every item backlogged, misfiled or omitted. and plus
ten for
files in correct order and in PT.
TAPE EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE UNIT
Ideal Scene: Tapes and tape machines in excellent condition and
sufficient
number with every tape on every checksheet available to
students.
Stat: Number of tapes in excellent condition and plus five
for every
tape machine in good condition, and minus 20 for any
missing tape
on the checksheets and every tape and tape machine in
disrepair.
HGC ADMINISTRATION SECTION
HGC ADMINISTRATOR
Ideal Scene: Lots of preclears being audited fully with flawless
scheduling
and routing and many more being brought in.
Stat: Number of individual HGC Preclears correctly handled.
scheduled,
and receiving auditing plus five each for any with
finished time
sent to
15
registrar and cashier, and plus five for any paid
preclear who
was started earlier than he was scheduled for.
HGC ASSIGNMENT CLERK
Ideal Scene: Lots of Preclears correctly assigned and scheduled
being fully
audited and progressing up the grades.
Stat: Number of preclears correctly assigned on the board
minus five
for any misassigned, omitted, or having to wait for
auditors.
HGC ROOM ASSIGNMENT CLERK
Ideal Scene: Sufficient number of comfortable attractive auditing
rooms so
that there are no distractions and no auditor or
preclear has
to wait.
Stat: Number of correctly assigned auditing rooms plus five
for every
room improvement cycle done.
PRIORITY LIST CLERK
Ideal Scene: Priority Service quickly available for any Preclear who
wishes
and will pay for it without breaking up auditing
already in
progress.
Stat: One point for every hour of priority auditing paid for
and
delivered.
PC LOCATION CLERK
Ideal Scene: Any pc missing or blown instantly located and brought
in to
Ethics and resumption of service.
Stat: Number of pcs in the HGC minus ten for any absence from
each
session, and plus ten for every week with perfect
attendance.
FILES CLERK
Ideal Scene: HGC files in PT and excellent order for instant
reference and
data on auditors, preclears and HGC.
Stat: Number of correctly filed items minus five for any
backlogged,
misfiled or omitted and plus ten for files correctly in
PT.
SERVICE SECTION
SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR
Ideal Scene: Adequately housed students and preclears having
adequate
transport and area services with security in and good
PR Area
Control.
Stat: Number of students and preclears correctly housed plus
ten
points if no flaps on housing, transport or passport
lines, but
minus five for each flap during the week.
Note: "Flap" is defined as a condition of panic or
confusion
or out PR or error or delay in assignment resulting in
any
inconvenience to the student or pc.
INFORMATION CLERK
Ideal Scene: Helpful area information service given to preclears and
students
so that morale is high and PR Area Control is good.
Stat: Number of helpful pieces of information on service
lines given
to students or preclears.
HOUSING CLERK
Ideal Scene: Every student adequately housed with good morale and PR
Area
Control.
16
Stat: Number of students correctly housed plus five points
for every
proper additional housing unit available, and minus ten
for any
housing flap.
Note: Use definition of flap as above.
Definition of Housing Unit is: any proper room which
houses up
to three people, proper dormitories for six or more
counting as
ten points.
TRANSPORTATION CLERK
Ideal Scene: Every student having necessary transportation
arrangements so
that he can attend every service he has on time.
Stat: Number of students and preclears whose transport has
been
arranged during week, plus ten for no flap, and minus
ten for
every flap on transport lines during week.
Note: Use definition of flap as above.
PASSPORT CLERK
Ideal Scene: Wherever passports are required, every student's
passport
correctly handled with resultant lack of Port Flaps.
Stat: Number of student and preclear passports correctly
filed
and in PT plus ten for no flaps and minus lOO for every
expired, lost, stolen or incorrectly handled passport
during week.
Note: Use definition of flap as above.
TECH RESERVATIONS UNIT
TECH RESERVATIONS ADMINISTRATOR
Ideal Scene: Every paid or former preclear and student given a
definite
starting time and bringing this time closer to PT .
Stat: Total number of paid students and preclears who started
service within the week plus ten for everyone starting
at
least one week before originally scheduled.
LETTER TYPISTS
Ideal Scene: Lots of excellent, on-policy letters written to paid or
former
preclears and students to bring them in and/or start
their
service closer to PT.
Stat: Number of letters written to former students or
preclears or
any who have advance paid, plus ten points for any
written to
who come in for service, minus 50 for any poorly
written or off-
policy written letter.
HSDC COURSE ADMINISTRATOR
(Note: The Dianetic Course Administrator would be required only in
Orgs with
very large Academies of in Orgs where only Dianetics Courses are
given. SHSBCs
and Academies will have the usual Course Administrators.)
Ideal Scene: To supply all required Student equipment, material and
supplies,
and to route, log, record and file student cycles
through the
course.
Stat: Dual: 1. Number of required items usefully added to course
materials
less 50 points for any required item not available
to
students.
2. Number of student cycles properly routed, logged,
recorded
and filed.
DEPARTMENT 11
DEPARTMENT OF TRAINING
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING
Ideal Scene: Good tight courses producing lots of excellently
trained and
fully
17
audited graduated auditors who are willing and able to
train and
audit others by joining staff.
Stat: Dual: 1. Total number of combined points of all students on
courses based
on Flag Authorized Point System.
2. Total number of auditors graduated.
DIANETIC COURSES SECTION
HSDC AND HSDG COURSE SUPERVISORS
Ideal Scene: Excellently run classes producing lots of HSDG
Graduates who are
willing and able to train and audit others and who go
on to
further training.
DIANETIC COURSE CHIEF SUPERVISOR
Stat: Combined points of all students on Dianetic courses
based on the
Flag Authorized Point System.
HSDC SUPERVISORS
Stat: Combined points of all students on the HSDC Course
based on the
Flag Authorized Point System.
HSDG SUPERVISORS
Stat: Combined points of all students on the HSDG Course
based on the
Flag Authorized Point System.
ACADEMY COURSES SECTION
ACADEMY COURSES CHIEF SUPERVISOR
Ideal Scene: Excellently run courses by excellently trained
supervisors
producing lots of excellently trained fully audited
auditors
who continue on up to the next level and then to the
SHSBC.
Stat: Combined points based on the Flag Authorized Point
System of
all students on courses.
COURSE SUPERVISORS
Ideal Scene: An excellently run course producing lots of excellently
trained fully audited auditors who continue on up to
the next
level.
LEVEL 0 COURSE SUPERVISOR
LEVEL 1 COURSE SUPERVISOR
LEVEL 2 COURSE SUPERVISOR
LEVEL 3 COURSE SUPERVISOR
LEVEL 4 COURSE SUPERVISOR
Stat: Each supervisor has the combined points of all students
on his
course. points based on the Flag Authorized Point
System minus
3000 points for every student absent more than 2 study
days in
the week.
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE SECTION
UNIT SUPERVISORS A, B, C
Ideal Scene: Tough, tight, complete training producing excellent
auditors who
will go on to upper levels fully able to handle
anything.
UNIT A SUPERVISOR
UNIT B SUPER VISOR
UNIT C SUPER VISOR
Stat: Each Supervisor has the combined points based on the
Flag
Authorized Point System of all his students minus 3000
points
for every student absent more than 2 study days in the
week.
18
SOLO SECTION
SOLO COURSE SUPER VISOR UNIT D CLASS VI
Ideal Scene: Tough, tight course producing superlative self-
determined auditors
ready and able to go on to Clear and OT -and go on to
higher
classes of auditing.
Stat: Combined points based on the Flag Authorized Point
System of all
his students minus 3000 points for every student absent
more than
2 study days in the week.
SOLO AUDIT SECTION
Ideal Scene: A tight, complete course producing well trained solo
auditors who
will go on to Clear and want to take the Briefing
Course.
SOLO AUDIT COURSE SUPERVISOR
Stat: Combined points based on the Flag Authorized Point
System of all
his students minus 3000 points for every student absent
more than
2 study days in the week.
DEPARTMENT 12 DEPARTMENT OF PROCESSING
DIRECTOR OF PROCESSING
Ideal Scene: An efficient, busy department with lots of well trained
auditors
fully auditing many preclears up the grades so that they
will sign
up for more auditing and go on to be trained.
Stat: Total number of auditing hours, less 25 for every pc
backlogged
more than 3 days.
TECH CASE SUPERVISORS
Note: Per "HGC Cure" HCO PL 1 Feb '66, the Case
Supervisor may
not take Technical orders from the D of P. The Case
Supervisor
is under the Tech Sec, not the D of P.
Ideal Scene: Flawless C/Sing of every folder so that every session
results
in F/N, GIs at Examiner, and every preclear is fully and
properly
audited without error.
Stat: % of F/N, VGI sessions at Examiner.
LEADING AUDITORS OF SECTIONS, AUDITORS
Ideal Scene: Many hours of well done auditing resulting in happy,
fully audited
preclears who wish to become auditors and sign up for
training.
LEADING AUDITORS
Stat: Total of all auditors' stats in his section, plus his
own.
AUDITORS
Stat: Total of well done auditing hours that F/N VGI at
Examiner plus
1/2 hour credit for every hour spent on folder error
summaries,
plus credit for past sessions that ended with F/N VGIs
which did
not last to the Examiner but brought about case progress
and F/N
VGIs later. If sessions had no flubs.
Lt. Cmdr. Joan
Robertson
CS-4
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JR:sb.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Amended by HCO P/L 1 March 1972, Case
Supervisor Statistic, in the 1972 Year Book.]
19
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 FEBRUARY 1971
Issue V
[Excerpt]
ORG GROSS DIVISIONAL STATISTICS
REVISED
(Amends HCO Pol Ltr 30 Sept 65- Stats for Divisions)
TECH DIVISION 4
1. Total points for all students in the Department of Training for
the week
past, based on the Flag authorized point system, per the latest
HCO Policy
Letter on Student points.
2. Total number of WELL DONE hours audited in the HGC for the week
past, as
defined in HCO B 21 August 1970 "Session Grading. Well Done,
Definition of"
and HCO B 18 Oct 1970 "Auditors Stats on FN VGIs."
HCO Aide
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:HE:mes.rd
Copyright ($) 1971
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: A complete copy of this Policy Letter can be found in the 1971
Year
Book. See also HCO P/L 5 December 1972 Issue II, Student Completions
Statistic,
in the 1972 Year Book. ]
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER ORIGINAL COLOUR FLASH NOT GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
LONDON
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1956
To Washington and London
FLOW LINE FOR PERSONNEL
The Procurement of Personnel for the Organization Technical Staff
should be
from the field or the School to the HGC, from the HGC to staff posts
when
important and need filling.
In other words, a blank for Day Instructor is filled from HGC staff-
the
replacement on HGC staff comes from the field or from the students at
the School.
Exception-Business staff is occasionally transferred to Technical
staff.
Reason-it is easier to brief on auditing than on what we do in the
Organization. Auditing not Organization is real to field and student.
L. RON HUBBARD
20
THE FOUNDING CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
1812 19th Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
FOUNDING CHURCH POLICY LETTER OF 1 APRIL 1957
TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS
To better accomplish our goal, the organization is divided herewith
into two
divisions:
Technical and Administrative
These bear as indicated on the new Organizational Board.
The head of the Technical Division has the title of Technical
Director. Under
this post comes the Director of Training and the Director of
Processing and
the Director of Testing and Counseling.
The Technical Director co-ordinates all training and processing
activities.
He holds auditors' Conference, checks sessions, assigns preclears, he
passes
on schedules and subject matter in training.
The Director of Administration passes on all administrative matters
including
procurement and central files as indicated on the Organizational
Board. No
change is made in the posts of Director of Training or the Director of
Processing except that the Director of Processing is now expected to take
preclears when necessary and to keep a close eye on procurement.
The Technical Director is to act as a bridge between service and
procurement
and should work closely with the Registrar and Administration.
This is put into effect in Washington after a 6-months' trial in
London where
the two divisions have functioned with a higher income level than ever
before.
It is being tried on for size in Washington.
L. RON HUBBARD
Executive
Manager
21
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HASI POLICY LETTER OF 7 MAY 1957
ASSIGNMENT OF AUDITORS, ROOMS, STUDENTS
Registrar has no authority to and must not assign auditors to
preclears,
Auditing rooms to preclears or students to class.
Director of Processing has no right to direct Registrar in signing up
preclears.
Director of Training has no right to direct Registrar in signing up
students.
There is no co-operation between Registrar and Directors of Processing
and
Training.
Registrar signs up anyone she pleases for any length of time with any
promise or compromise. Only when signing up is complete do Directors
of
Training and Processing have any ownership.
Directors of Training and Processing cannot direct Registrar in
cutting back
numbers of people to be processed or trained.
Registrar signs up. Director of Processing and Director of Training
cope with it.
If a person can "only be processed on Thursdays for the next two
years",
Registrar signs up. Director of Processing can accept it or argue the
preclear
into a three-week sprint.
Exception: IF the Director of Processing will not accept a preclear
for one week
he feels is a 3-weeker, he can reject and send person back.
Exception: IF the Director of Training will not accept a student for a
higher
course than he believes student can take, he can reject for a lower
course or
processing.
Registrar just isn't in the HGC or the Academy.
Costs more processing when this is done wrong.
Penalty: Flagrant violation of this rule can bring about transfer from
post.
Registrar signs people up.
Director of Processing and Director o f Training cope.
To do this otherwise is high treason to staff and public.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:rd
Copyright ($) 1957
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
22
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER ORIGINAL COLOUR FLASH NOT GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812 19th Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
HCO INFORMATION BULLETIN OF 1 JUNE 1957
RIGHTS OF THE DIRECTORS OF TRAINING AND PROCESSING,
STAFF AUDITORS AND INSTRUCTORS
REGARDING PRECLEARS AND STUDENTS
The Director of Processing may refuse a preclear already registered on
the
following grounds, and only on these grounds:
1. Risk to Clinic by reason of low profile or connections.
2. Not enough weeks bought by pc (example: bought one, needs three).
3. Non-payment of former debts to Clinic.
He may not refuse a pc on grounds of insufficient auditors or
inconvenience to
staff. In case of refusal he returns pc to Registrar.
The Director of Training may refuse a student already registered on
the
following grounds and only on these grounds:
1. Flagrantly needs processing of a more expert level than student
intensive.
0
2. Signed up for a course for which student not qualified by earlier
training.
3. Non-payment of former debts to Academy.
He may not refuse students on grounds of insufficient instructors or
classrooms.
In case of refusal he returns student to the Registrar.
A Staff Auditor may refuse to process a pc on following grounds:
1. Psychotic past history of institutional nature.
2. Marked antipathy to case.
An Instructor may refuse training in his unit to a student who.
1. Gives no evidence of having learned the basics taught in a lower
unit. (In
which case he returns student to the lower unit.)
2. Flagrantly needs processing. (In which case he sends student to
Director
of Training and thence to Registrar.)
3. Is chronically absent or tardy. (In which case he sends student to
Director
of Training.)
4. Who disobeys school regulations. (In which case he sends student to
Director
of Training.)
A Director of Processing may refuse to sign out or release a preclear
he
considers vitally in need of further processing. In which case he
sends preclear
to Registrar.
The Director of Training may refuse to send a student to the Examiner
by reason
that he will not be a credit to the corps of auditors. He is under no
compulsion
to train such a student beyond the allotted training period but may do
so at his
discretion.
A Staff Auditor may refuse to release a preclear from the HGC whom he
feels in
vital need of further processing regardless of the opinion or
administration of
the Director of Processing or the Registrar. He should send the pc to
the
Registrar but may give further processing whether or not the preclear
signs up
for more and despite any remonstrance of the Director of Processing.
An Instructor may refuse to release a student to a higher class or to
Examination despite the opinion or the administration of the Director
of
Training.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:rd
23
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER ORIGINAL COLOUR FLASH NOT GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
ASSOCIATION SECRETARY DIRECTIVE
As per LRH's Memo of 11 July 1957
TECH STAFF CERTIFICATE VALIDATION
All Technical Staff must have their certificates validated before
hiring, or
by August 15th at the latest.
Jack
Parkhouse
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 NOVEMBER 1960
[Excerpt]
Assn Secs
HCO Secs
Dir PrR
SIGN UP OF STUDENTS AND PCS
ACCEPTANCE BY D/P AND D/T
No pc or student may be sent to D of P or D of T without having been
signed up
fully by PrR. D of P and D of T are not selling personnel.
D of P may increase required hours before technical acceptance of pc.
In which
case pc is returned to PrR for re-signing.
D of T may reject a student for health or security reasons, at which
time PrR
must re-sign for adequate processing. People with a Communist or
subversive
record or who are studying Scientology for use in other healing fields-
psychology, medicine, psychiatry, psycho-analysis, Christian Science,
may not
be accepted for training.
The D of T always does a security check particularly of above points
before
accepting a student.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.rd
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The complete Policy Letter, entitled URGENT PR R,
can be found in Volume 2, page 261.]
24
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 MAY 1961
(Reissued on 21 June 1967)
Remimeo
All Staff
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
A MESSAGE TO THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIES
AND ALL ORG STAFF
QUALITY COUNTS
Clearing is now in the reach of every Scientologist.
Excellent Auditor training is now in the reach of every Academy.
And these are the only things in the long run that will count.
When I see an Organization staff panting after newspaper publicity or
going mad
on the subject of dissemination, and at the same time turning in to me
bad
results and poor student quality, I know somebody has their targets
mixed up.
Quality is the only thing that counts. If quality in training and
processing is
not given first rank and constant priority by Secretaries or Executive
Secretaries, then all the administration in the world will not make
the grade
for any Central Org.
Deliver the goods. Thats a crude way to put it. But if you want a new
and better
civilization you won't get it by advertising or worrying what people
think of
you. You will get it only by releasing and clearing people and sending
them out
into the society to get the show on the road in all branches of human
activity,
including Scientology.
I know we have been a long time without clearing people. But we're
clearing them
now. What does it take to clear people? It takes highly skilled and
tightly
supervised auditing. It takes good technology. It takes good technical
application.
If you'll forget about how easy it is to mob students all up in a
class and
actually confront each student as an individual, make sure he knows
every
essential step he has to know, make sure all his questions get
answered, you'll
have auditors that can audit.
Will you please put attention on raising technical skill in the HGC,
releasing
people, clearing people, and on the quality of training in the Academy
to the
end of getting every student capable of all the steps necessary to
release
people.
I have made the grade technically in the field of research. Now it's
time to
drop all the booboo's and nonsense. All you have to do in an Org is
release and
clear people and turn out auditors who can release people and keep in
contact
with the public and treat them well and you're over the top.
This morning 1 received a cable from an Org. An urgent cable. Did it
say, "How
do you assess for a Pre-Hav level or something sensible? No, it
didn't. It said,
"Send us some biographical data for a newspaper article." I spit. That
Org is
doing the lousiest job possible in Technical and is all worked up to
get
publicity. What's this? Do they think a society in this shape will
approve
Scientology into power? Hell no! And to hell with this society. Were
making a
new one, So lets skip the approval button from a lot of wogs and
settle down to
work to make new people and better people. Then maybe you'll have a
society.
Right here and right now this policy is laid down in concrete with an
atomic
branding iron: THE FIRST AND PRIMARY GOAL OF AN ORGANIZATION IS
DELIVERING THE
FOREMOST TECHNICAL QUALITY THAT CAN BE DELIVERED IN ITS AREA.
All right. I've made my technical target bang in the bulls eye. You
can release
and clear. You can train auditors well. Well, Christ! Lets do it, do
it, do it!
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ph.jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1961, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
25
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 JANUARY 1962
CenOCon
URGENT
CRASH PROGRAMME
I WANT THIS DONE.
Not that Orgs are failing, they are not, but on the contrary are
advancing. Not
that you don't have a lot to do routinely, you do.
BUT -our forward advance is stirring up certain exact problems common
to every
office. There are certain remedies for these problems. They are all
contained below.
This is what I want you to institute as the highest importance.
1. HCO Area Sec. Get Org Ruds in, one after the other, as rapidly as
you can and
then go over them again and again.
2. D of P-Outside pcs. At the end of each week's auditing on an HGC
pc, check
that pc out for MISSED Withholds and pull them. Do this as D of P,
or appoint
a special person who can really run a meter. The only question
asked is "Has
a withhold been missed on you?" Clean up those missed. If other
ruds wildly
out, return pc to his or her staff auditor to get the pc squared
away. Do
this on Thursday as part of pc's auditing time. Use a specialist,
not the
staff auditor.
Use a British Mark IV only. This will zoom ARC with org and get you
the re-
sign ups you are now missing.
3. HCO Sec's Staff Staff Auditor. Take staff staff auditors into HCO
but pay
them from Central Org. Run the staff through one by one and only
pick up
Missed Withholds with a British Mark IV meter. Pick up the missed
W/Hs and
then go to the next staff member. Applies to all staff members.
This is a
specialist action.
All HCO supervised, and HCO supervises all staff auditing from here
on. And
keep the staff members winning on their auditing.
4. D of T. Get personal with your students. Get them winning and
graduating.
Make auditors, don't just follow routine. Make students straighten
up
students. Personal interview students frequently. Get them winning.
Do
training by check sheet, not by mass classes.
Get auditors graduating. Keep their interest up. Get students
coming out
of the Academy and have them auditing to high quality.
5. HCO Board of Review. Take exam for Class II and III off the HCO
Area Sec.
Do good, sound examination. Does the staff member know the data not
the
commas. Find out what goofiness a person who can't pass an exam is
up against
and straighten it up, don't just examine and fail people. Get
people passing
perfect. Don't defy people to pass perfect. This data can be
learned.
Remember that data exams are complemented with practical
performance.
(We have a student at Saint Hill who knows all the HCOBs and tapes
perfectly
and yet couldn't give an assist to a cat or read a meter needle if
he were
threatened with hanging if he didn't do it.)
These are the things that will get the org there and raise your units.
So please, please, please get on them fast and keep on them.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:sf.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
26
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JANUARY 1962
CenOCon
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR AND ADMINISTRATOR
The last time orgs ran with minimal upset, especially in London, two
posts, now
empty everywhere, were filled. These posts were Technical Director,
who oversaw
all technical activities and Administrator who oversaw all
administrative actions.
These were two very busy posts.
Units have been reduced since 1958 by
(a) Lowered Technical results and
(b) Administrative Omissions.
--------
In a City Office, these two posts, rather than the director of
department posts,
should certainly be filled as a Tech Director can double in brass as D
of P and
D of T. And an Administrator does the accounts and Dir Mat posts and
oversees CF
and Address as well as income from the Registrar.
So in a City Office these two posts should be filled at once, and some
executive
posts dropped, at a great saving in units and personnel.
---------
In a Central Organization such as London and DC these two posts should
be filled
in addition to existing executive posts. The scrambles in CF and
Address alone
create more income loss than the added units.
At present HCO Area is actually doing these two posts in almost all
orgs. HCO
Area has its own duties such as Org Ruds and Hat Checks and is finding
it hard
to do these as well as Tech Director and Administrator supervision.
You mayor may not fill these posts elsewhere than London and DC. But I
feel it
would increase income and effectiveness.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:sf.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 MARCH 1962
CenOCon
STAFF REGULATION RELATIONS WITH PCS AND STUDENTS
No staff member or part time staff member shall have sexual relations
or any
kind of sexual relationship with any student or preclear who is not
their legal
spouse, while that person is enrolled in the Academy as a student, or
in the
HGC as a preclear; nor while a student who has been released from the
Academy
is waiting to take his or her HCO Board of Review test or examination;
nor while
a completed preclear is waiting to return home.
Penalty for infraction of this policy: Dismissal, with full penalty of
failure
to complete staff contract.
A notice to this effect should be posted permanently and prominently
on both
student and staff bulletin boards.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ph.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[See also HCO P/L 11 August 1967, Second Dynamic Rules, Volume 1, page
463.]
27
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 APRIL 1962
Central Orgs
All Staff
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
BASIC HAT
(Cancels HCO Policy Letter of 18 Feb 1962, same title)
The function of the Technical Director is to take charge of all
technical
activities in the organization. The Technical Director is immediately
below
Association Secretary and immediately above Directors of Technical
Departments.
The Technical Director is on a par with the Administrator.
The Technical Director displaces the Technical Council.
The first three objectives of the Technical Director are as follows:
1. To make absolutely and personally certain that every HGC Preclear
achieves
positive and real gains in every week's intensive in the HGC.
2. To make absolutely and personally certain that every student in the
Academy
is able to audit on graduation and that graduation is done rapidly.
3. To make absolutely certain that staff morale is kept high using
existing
technology.
The above are the Technical Directors priority functions. It will be
found that
when every week's intensive in an HGC pc makes a real and positive
gain for that
pc, the pc will re-sign and send in his family and friends and that
when gains
are not so achieved the procurement of pcs is very difficult. It will
also be
found that the Academy stays full only so long as tough tight 8-C is
run on the
students in scheduling and training and students are not kept forever
on course.
Staff morale only stays high when staff cases are kept cleaned up.
4. The Technical Director sees that the PE Foundation instruction and
scheduling
are well done and that no technical departure is made which will
discourage
PE attendees from enrolling.
5. The Technical Director sees to it that HAS Co-Audit processes do
not include
any that would tend to miss withholds on people in co-audit, which
is to say,
a withhold process must be ruled out if not done by an instructor.
6. The Technical Director makes certain that proper technical subject
matter
only is given in any course lecture and function.
Staff auditing effective now and staff staff auditors and staff
clearing
programmes are transferred to the Technical Director. Staff staff
auditors are
assigned directly to the Technical Director for his supervision and
assignment
on staff auditing schedules. Staff staff auditing in this respect
includes HCO
staff as well as Central Org staff. Staff staff auditors while
dominantly used
to audit staff may also be employed for other technical purposes by
the
Technical Director such as cleaning up missed withholds on HGC pcs,
checking out
HGC pcs at the end of intensive and checking out Academy students.
Staff technical training is done by the Technical Director or under
his or her
supervision. Check sheets for classification, all check out
examinations for
check sheets and all preliminary steps to final examination for
classification
are done by the Technical Director or under his or her supervision.
HCO is
responsible only for the final examination given after all check
sheets are
filled out. HCO's responsibility for this is under the HCO Board of
Review.
The implementing of Technical programmes, the training of staff
auditors,
instructors and staff staff auditors, the scheduling of classes in the
Academy
or for any full or part time course of any kind whatsoever is done by
the
Technical Director.
Note: There is no effort here to downgrade HCO. HCO has inherited this
hat
little by little plus the Administrator Hat to such a degree that an
HCO Sec
can no longer perform her basic functions.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: 18 Feb 1962, cancelled by this Pol Ltr, had the same text
except for item number 6, which was added 6 April 1962.]
28
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
DISTRICT OFFICES TECHNICAL REPORTS TO HCO WW
A District Office is regarded as an adjunct of its Area Central Org.
The technical standard and proficiency at each District Office in the
Technical
Directors Central Org Control Area are to be under the closest
possible
supervision of the Area Central Org Technical Director.
Since a District Office is intended to run simplified Co-audit
processes, no
special reports are at this time envisaged as being necessary to be
sent to HCO
WW other than the report on District Offices in the Central Org
Technical
Directors Weekly Report.
Therefore, no OCA graphs, etc are now required to be sent to HCO ww.
However,
the Area Central Org Technical Director will require these to be sent
to him
along with any other report he may wish to be instituted from his
District
Offices for his own information.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gI.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
IMPORTANT CHANGES IN TECHNICAL REPORTS TO HCO WW
ALL technical reports hitherto being sent to HCO Technical Secretary
WW are now
to be superseded by the attached,
Pre-cut stencils of these new reports have been sent to the HCOs at
Washington
DC, Los Angeles, London, Capetown and Melbourne. These reports should
be run off
on lightweight airmail paper, foolscap size (13" x 8'), red on white,
as soon as
possible for distribution to the Central Orgs in their areas. (The
reports for
Academy and HGC will be those requiring the most copies.)
The object of these new reports is to streamline the tech report lines
thus
minimising excess admin, and at the same time ensuring that the
technical
standard of the highest possible quality is achieved in all Central
Orgs.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
29
(Original to Ron, duplicate held at Org for file)
To : RON
From : Technical Director,_______________________________ (Org
location)
Friday___________
Dear Ron,
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR TECHNICAL
AT________________ ORG FOR WEEK
ENDING____________________
1. HGC.
Number of HGC pcs this week _________________
My comments and progress report for each pc audited in this HGC is
attached.
Comment on HGC as a whole this
week_________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
I am making absoluteiy and personally certain that every HGC
Preclear
achieves positive and real gains in every week's intensive in this
HGC.
Initial________________
Technical Director
2. Academy.
Number of times the Academy was personally visited by me this
week__________
hours
spent__________
Number of new students in the Academy this week
____________
Number of students attending the Academy this week
____________
Number of students graduated this week
____________
My comment and progress report for each student in the Academy this
week is
attached. Comment on Academy as a whole this
week___________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
I verify that students are not being treated as cases but as
students. A
tough, tight 8-c is being run on students in schedullng and
training and I
am making absolutely and personally certain that every student in
this
Academy is able to audit on graduation and that graduation is being
done
rapidly.
Initial________________ Technical
Director
3. Staff Morale.
Number of security checks given for new staff this week
_____________
My reports on progress on each member on Staff Clearing Co.audit is
attached.
The following questions have been nulled this week on all staff
members in
this Org (including all HCO staff).
"This past seven days, have you falsified any report?"
"This past seven days, what have you done that staff does not know
about'?"
Comment on Staff Morale as a whole this
week________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
I am making certain that staff morale is being kept high using
existing
technology.
Initial______________ Technical
Director
30
4. FE Foundation.
I have personally visted the PE Foundation________times this
week________
hours spent.
Number on PE Course_________ Number on Comm Course _________
Number on other Courses (state name of Course also)
_________
Number of Sign-ups from PE Course this week
_________
Comment on PE Foundation as a whole this
week______________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
I have seen that the PE Foundation and scheduling are well done
and that no
departure is being made which will discourage PE attendees from
enrolling.
Initial_________ Technical
Director
5. Technical at District Offices in this Org Control Areac
I have received and inspected this week the 2S-hour OCA (or
equivaient
Graphs from the following District
Offices_________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
I have personaliy interviewed each District Officer (after Adcom)
this week.
What advice was
sought_____________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
I have personally made this week a monthly spot-check
on___________________
___________________________________________(location of District
Office(s)).
I am seeing that the technical is of the highest possible standard
on the
Co-audit at each District Office in this Central Org Control Area.
Initial_________ Technical
Director
6. Course Lectures and Functions.
I have checked and made certain that the proper technical subject
matter
only was given at these this week.
Initial_________ Technical
Director
7. Staff Technical Training.
Total number of passes this week
_________
Total number of flunks this week
_________
Total number of check-outs this week
_________
The following staff
(names)_______________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
passed final examination by HCO this week (state also
classification after
each name).
Comment on Staff Training as a whole this
week____________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Initial_________ Technical
Director
8. Comments and suggestions and
recommendations______________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Best,
(Signed) Technical
Director
31
HGC__________________________________ (Org location)
Distribution: Top two copies to RON, 2nd copy will be returned by HCO
WW to
Tech Dir. Triplicate to be returned by Tech Dir
immediately after
completion to D/P for action, then to HGC Admin for
filing in
pc's folder.
PROGRESS REPORT ON PC (name)___________________________________ for
w/e_________
Previous HGC auditing _________________________(hours)
This Intensive from_______________ to_______________ amount of hours
This Intensive, Auditor's name___________________________________
Class_________
Main process run________________________________________
Amount of time spent on main process (approx)_________________________
(hours)
How many ARC Breaks were there?______________________
Test Results: Graph: Good Change / No change / Lowered graph*
IQ at start of this Intensive___________ After
Intensive__________
Auditor's comment on
progress___________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Date____________ Signed____________________________________________
Auditor
(All the above to be completed by the Auditor in time for the D/P's
end-of-
week/end-of-Intensive* Interview with pc, and handed to D/P.)
Director of Processing Interview Report
E-Meter reading at start of Interview. T/A_____ Sens______ Type of
Needle_______
(D/P hands pc's copy of Test results to pc. All numbered questions
hereon to be asked direct of pc.)
1. "What is your opinion of your Test
results?"________________________________
2. "In this Intensive, has your auditor missed any withholds on you?"
Yes/No* (meter null before proceeding further).
Result of Line Plot check with
pc_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
(Note each item not null and its read, also goal.)
3. "Have you achieved your session goals'?" Yes/No* "Your goals set
for this
Intensive'?" Yes/No* "Any other gains in this Intensive?" Yes/No*
If answer
is No to any of these questions, state here goals or gains not
made in this
Intensive
__________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
4. "Are there any suggestions you would like to
make?"_________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Future Processing planned/signed up
for________________________________ (hours)*
D/P readies pc towards end of Interview, then asks:
5. "In this Interview, is there anything you have failed to reveal?"
Yes/No*
D/P nulls before ending Interview.
E-Meter reading at end of Interview: TA________ Sens________
Needle________
D/P thanks pc then ends Interview.
Comments and instructions on current state of
case_____________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
________
Date________ Signed______________________________________ Director of
Processing
Technical Director's Report
I have personally reviewed this case.
My comments and
instructions____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Date__________ Signed________________________________________
Technical Director
HCO WW
comment__________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Date__________ Signed________________________________________
*Delete inapplicable
32
ACADEMY_______________________________________________________ (Org
location)
Distribution: Top two copies to RON, 2nd copy will be returned by HCO
ww to
Tech Dir. Triplicate to be returned by Tech Dir
immediately after
completion to D/T for action, then to Acad Admin for
filing in
student's folder.
PROGRESS REPORT ON STUDENT (name)____________________________ for
w/e__________
Title of Course.
HPA/HCA/HPS/B.Scn/HCS/Retread/*_______________________
Date commenced on Course________________________
Date due to Graduate____________________________
Length of time already on Course including this week______________
(weeks)
Stage reached on Course_____________________
Number of Passes this week____________________
Number of Flunks this week______________________
Number of Check-ou ts this week____________________
(The above to be completed by the Academy Admin)
Unit Instructors
Comment________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Date_____________ Signed_____________________________________ Unit
Instructor
(All the above is to be completed in time for students brief end-of-
week
personal interview with Director of Training and handed to D/T)
Director of Training Interview Report
Is student within schedule of Course? Yes/No*
To be asked directly of student:
"How are you progressing on
Course?"____________________________________________
"What are you having the most trouble
with?"____________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
"What are you succeeding best
at?"_____________________________________________
Director Training
instructions__________________________________________________
Date__________ Signed______________________________________ Director
of Training
Technical Director Report
Comment on progress of this
student_____________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
__________
Instructions and
recommendations________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
__________
Date__________ Signed________________________________________
Technical Director
HCO WW
Comment__________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Date__________ Signed____________________________________
*Delete inapplicable
33
(Original to Ron, duplicate held at
Org for file)
To : RON
From : Technical Director,_____________________________ (Org
location)
Dear Ron,
REPORT ON STAFF CLEARING CO-AUDIT FOR WEEK
ENDING______________
Total number of personnel on Staff at this Central Org, including
HCO this week
______________
Total number of staff audited this week
______________
(Above and all number 1, 2, 3 and 4 below are to be completed by the
HGC Admin
in readiness for Technical Director to complete this report.)
1. Name of pc____________________ Auditor's name___________________
Class______
2. Total hours received up to start of this week__________
3. Total hours given this week __________
4. Total to date __________
Process being run________________________
How is case
progressing?________________________________________________________
1. Name of pc____________________ Auditor's name___________________
Class______
2. Total hours received up to start of this week__________
3. Total hours given this week __________
4. Total to date __________
Process being run________________________
How is case
progressing?________________________________________________________
1. Name of pc____________________ Auditor's name___________________
Class______
2. Total hours received up to start of this week__________
3. Total hours given this week __________
4. Total to date __________
Process being run________________________
How is case
progressing?________________________________________________________
1. Name of pc____________________ Auditor's name___________________
Class______
2. Total hours received up to start of this week__________
3. Total hours given this week __________
4. Total to date __________
Process being run________________________
How is case
progressing?________________________________________________________
1. Name of pc____________________ Auditor's name___________________
Class______
2. Total hours received up to start of this week__________
3. Total hours given this week __________
4. Total to date __________
Process being run________________________
How is case
progressing?________________________________________________________
Reports are being regularly submitted to me All schedules for auditing
are being
strictly maintained. I have personally checked the Line Plot of each
Staff pc
regularly and I have personally checked out each item and each goal
found on Staff.
Comment on Staff Clearing Co-Audit as a whole this
week_________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Best,
(Signed) Technical
Director
[Note: The form is extended to cover more
preclears as above when run off for use by
the Technical Director.]
34
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
HCO WW POST DISBANDED - HCO TECHNICAL SECRETARY WW
The post of HCO Technical Secretary WW is to be disbanded.
Technical reports sent from Central Orgs to HCO WW are now to be
handled by
and routed via Deputy HCO Executive Secretary WW to me.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORTS
At Orgs in which the Technical Director's post is yet unfilled, the
Assoc/Org
Sec is to personally complete the new Technical Director's Reports, as
set out
in HCO Policy Letter "Important Changes in Technical Reports to HCO
WW" dated
April 4, 1963.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:gI.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
35
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
HANDLING ORG TECHNICAL QUERIES
With the new technical reports being handled now by the Deputy HCO
Exec Sec WW,
it is not intended that technical queries be included. These reports
are
Progress reports.
All Org technical queries should be well within the scope of being
handled by
the Org Technical Director.
If the Org Technical Director is unable tq handle a particular query ,
he should
always endeavour to settle the matter by telex with the senior
Technical
Director within his continent or with his Continental Director.
In the very rare instances where a technical q uery cannot be settled
locally, a
despatch should be sent to Ron by the senior Continental Technical
Executive
stating the matter briefly and it will be handled immediately.
Issued by: Robin
Hancocks
Deputy HCO
Executive
Secretary WW
Authorized by: L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 JULY 1963
CenOCon
CHANGE OF ROUTING: ORG TECHNICAL REPORTS
The original copies of aIl Org technical reports are to be seen,
commented upon
where necessary, and initialled by the Assoc/Org Sec prior to being
airmailed to
HCO WW-
For Orgs in Southern Africa and Australia, Org technical reports are
to be routed
via Continental Director and thence airmailed to HCO WW .
Delays on these tech report lines are to be minimised as much as
possible.
These changes of routing are made so as to put in the correct command-
lines.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
36
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 OCTOBER 1963
CenOCon
TECHNICAL COUNCIL
PURPOSE: To uphold and increase the Technical Excellence of the
Organiza-
tion through supervision, advice and training.
DUTIES: To put in and maintain the technical lines and data in
the
Organization. To clarify any technical difficulties.
MEMBERSHIP: The Technical Council is headed by the Technical
Director, and is
composed of any Staff Member who is a Saint Hill Graduate
with a
Classification of III or above.
SCHEDULE: The Council will meet on order of the Technical Director:
as
needed to resolve technical difficulties as observed by
its
members; on appeal from a Staff Member or Department
Head.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dr.aap
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 FEBRUARY AD 14
(Reissued on 23 June 1967)
Remimeo
Tech Sec's Hat
Qual Secs Hat
D of T Hat
D of P Hat
Registrar Hat
Franchise
Field
BPI
ENROLMENT ON SELF DETERMINISM
No applicant will be accepted at Saint Hill, or should be accepted by
any
Organization for training or processing, who is not there on his or
her own
self determinism, but who has been ordered to training or processing
by an
Organization, or who has been compelled to undergo training or
processing
by a manager, judge, relative or anyone other than the applicant.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gI.jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1964, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
37
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 FEBRUARY 1964
CenOCon
TECHNICAL SUPERVISION CHANGES
Effective on receipt, the following changes should be made.
The post of Technical Director is abolished.
The post of Auditing Supervisor is abolished.
The new post of Case Supervisor is created.
A Technical Council is instituted.
The HCO Area Sec takes over the function of Technical Director, since
HCO
is and always has been responsible for ensuring understanding and
proper
application of Technical in the Org-
Part of the function of the Tech Director is taken over by the newly
created
Technical Council. This consists of the HCO Area Sec (Chairman); the
Assoc
Sec/Org Sec; the D of P; the D of T; the Case Supervisor; and the Dir
or PE.
The council meets once a week. The Technical Council is not
substitutable for
a Technical Director, since a council can only meet and decide action,
not
handle the progress of individuals. Therefore, the function of seeing
that
every student and pc is made happy is taken over by the Case
Supervisor.
Initially, the post of Case Supervisor may be filled by the present
Technical
Director. The function of Case Supervisor is made clear from a rundown
or hat
separately published.
The Case Supervisor is a HASI (FC) personnel but under the Supervision
of the
HCO Area Secretary. On all matters affecting cases, whether Staff or
public pcs
or Students, the Case Supervisor is answerable only to the HCO Area
Secretary.
The post of Auditing Supervisor is superfluous, since auditing in the
Academy
should be supervised by the Practical and Theory Supervisors, or by
any
available instructor, under the direction of the D of T. Schedules
should be
arranged so that the Auditing units are not working at the same time
as
Practical or Theory .
The report line to HCO WW should now be channelled to the new
corporation,
Scientology Library and Research Ltd, which is concerned partly with
the
maintenance of good Technical everywhere and the preservation of
Technical
records. The correct terminal to send all Technical reports to is
Research
Secretary WW.
The HCO Area Sec is responsible for seeing that these changes are
initiated
smoothly and with minimum randomity.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
Org
Supervisor WW
for L. RON
HUBBARD
Authorised by: L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
38
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 MARCH AD14
CenOCon
URGENT
TECHNICAL REPORTS
All Central Organization technical reports shall hereafter be
routed
personally to myself.
All Academy Student reports shall be addressed by the student to
me
personally. Such reports shall be on a weekly basis.
A report on the Auditing of every HGC preclear shall be sent to
me
personally at the end of each intensive. The form of such reports
shall be
as in the past and should consist of copies of the actual auditor's
reports.
Emergency or difficulty cases may be made the subject of cable
or telex.
No such requests may be telexed or cabled so as to arrive Saturday or
Sunday at
Saint Hill. Only reports arriving Monday to Friday noon at Saint Hill
will be
handled.
Full information from and about every student and preclear, but
not public
co-audit or PE members, must be sent through to me.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dr.gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 28
October 1968,
Technical Reports, page
92.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 AUGUST 1964
General
Remimeo
Magazine
Editors
Dissem Secs
POLICY ON TECHNICAL INFORMATION
No technical information or reports may be printed or released
except from
Saint Hill or approved first by Saint Hill.
Reason: Failures of the Wichita and Elizabeth centres are traced
to this
action of random technology.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
39
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1964
[Excerpt]
AUDITING AND TRAINING POLICIES
COST OF SERVICE
You must realize, despite propaganda about our expensiveness,
that our
services break into two parts.
(a) Cheap, broad services for everyone.
(b) Personal services at a much higher (but cheaper than any other
field) price.
Don't get confused and try to make (a) expensive or (b) cheap.
Whenever I get a plea from some staff to "cut our prices" I now
realize
they haven't got (a) and (b) separate and they're confused and try to
identify
all service with all service.
Make our cheap services (PE, HAS, Co-audit, brief assists) very,
very,
very cheap. Give them away, in fact. This is broad, general
Scientology. You
have to spend money to give them away. The book auditor, the Extension
Course,
the dollar book, the magazine, these are all part of these cheap
services.
Most orgs err in never really spending money on cheap services.
They get
all tied up with income needs and sell only expensive services and
never get a
whirlwind of interest going.
Cheap service costs the org money. You have to hire staff just
to
administer it. You have to have people to care for it. You answer
letters from
book auditors (but the Letter Reg doesn't) and PE people and greet out-
of-
Towners with a hostess.
You don't turn such traffic off because it doesn't buy. You form
a place
for it to come to like a public lounge. You give it tape plays. You
whip it up
to a roar. And you don't let it into your production departments or
lines
because it bothers these and upsets them.
For instance, you never give away an Academy Course. You always
charge
heavily for it. But you give public tape plays that train the
"multitude".
ALL PERSONAL SERVICES RENDERED TO THE INDIVIDUAL RESULTING IN A
GOOD
PROCESS RESULT OR A WORTHWHILE CERTIFICATE MUST BE CHARGED FOR
HEAVILY.
COURSES
The in between on this above was the HQS Course. Hence the
following
training policies are adopted as of January 1, 1965.
ALL HUBBARD QUALIFIED SCIENTOLOGY COURSES MUST COST THE SAME AS
HUBBARD
CERTIFIED AUDITOR COURSES.
The policy of gradient course costs is abandoned as
unsuccessful.
THE COST OF A CERTIFICATE COURSE MAY NOT BE LESS THAN ONE
MONTH'S AVERAGE
PAY FOR THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS GIVEN AND MUST BE IN CASH.
By average pay is meant the average upper lower class or lower
middle
class pay scale. (Example guesses: U.K. about �50. U.S. about $500.
Australia
about �75. South Africa about �80.)
HIGHER LEVEL COURSES CAN BE CHARGED FOR AT HIGHER RATES (HCS AND
HSS).
Have more courses of shorter duiation with less in them.
The policy is -
DON'T TEACH CERTIFICATE COURSES OF MORE THAN ONE MONTH'S
DURATION IN CENTRAL ORGANIZATIONS.
DON'T HOLD STUDENTS BEYOND ONE MONTH.
40
This requires more certificates and classifications to be used.
Example: Have an HQS Course lasting one month. Next year have
the
student back for his HCA. Next year get him in for his HPA, etc.
Make the student study at home "to get his classification so he
can
enter the next course" or "get some processing before next enrollment"
if
the student seems shaky. Don't hold the student on course because he's
shaky.
Give him his certificate and note what he has to do before the next
one.
Hold back classification if not sure.
PRESENT CERTIFICATES AT COURSE COMPLETION.
CERTIFICATES DO NOT DEPEND ON EXAMINATION..
ONLY CLASSIFICATION CAN REQUIRE EXAMINATION.
HAS
The exception in courses is HAS which is a public course and
cheap.
DO NOT TEACH PROCESSING IN HAS COURSES.
Teach only study, good definition materials, the philosophy of
life, etc.
HAS CO-AUDIT
THE PUBLIC CO-AUDIT MAY ONLY DO SUPERVISED ITSA.
No Clay Table, definitions or any fancy processes of any kind
may be
done in the Co-audit. Only R-l-C.
Co-audits will thrive if they're cheap and attendees only
listen. Don't
try for any results. If cases don't progress suggest HGC auditing at
regular
rates "since you're a special type of case".
HQS
TEACH AN HQS STUDENT TO DO ASSISTS, 8C, HAVINGNESS AND TRIO
WELL.
Whatever else they're taught, make sure they do the above well.
These were the howling successes of the late '5Os. Polling all
active
auditors showed they had their best results and realities on these
only. They're
easy to teach. They work well.
Use the whole training programme for HQS but make them do these
4 things
well as auditors and make them do them when they get out and process
pcs. And
they'll mostly win. Try more and they'll dothem top badly and mostly
lose.
HCA
TEACH THE BALANCE OF REPETITIVE PROCESSES, THE AUDITING CYCLE
AND METERS
AT HCA LEVEL.
HPA
TEACH CLAY TABLE HEALING IN HPA COURSES.
HCS.
TEACH CLAY TABLE CLEARING IN HCS COURSES.
HSS.
Until 1968 GPMs will be taught only at Saint Hill.
CLASS REVISION
This gives the following table of certificates and classes.
PE - Level 0 - actually begins the HAS Course.
HAS - Level 0 - Philosophy, study, no auditing but co-audit sign
ups use
Itsa. Consists of about 60 lessons, mainly about Life and What
Scientology is
and how to study "Learning how to Learn", vocabulary of Scientology.
HQS - Class I - Comm Course, Upper Indoc, Assists, 8C,
Havingness, Trio.
41
HCA - Class II - Repetitive processes, metering.
HPA - Class III - Assessments, Clay Table Healing.
HCS - Class IV - Clay Table Clearing.
HAA - Class V - Not used just now.
HSS - Class VI - GPMs - Taught only at Saint Hill until 1968.
HGA - Class VII - Not yet being offered but mainly OT type
processes
already developed.
This changes classification levels slightly at the bottom but
only
because it didn't work out well the way it was laid out. This must not
interfere with the classification of existing Academy students because
of
this policy.
PROMISES
DELIVER WHAT WE HAVE PROMISED.
We must do what we promise we will do even when it was a staff
member
error. The best way to avoid embarrassment is not to promise what you
won't
eventually deliver.
Academy students promised on enrollment what they'll receive
must receive
it.
The above policy changes were made necessary by the policy that
we must
have shorter courses more often and by the following policy, now
possible
because of technical break throughs.
A COURSE MUST CULMINATE IN TEACHING A DEFINITE SKILL OR SKILLS.
When you plan a course, plan to have the student able to perform
a
definite action well when he completes it. Don't have fuzzy
generalized ideas
of a course such as "teach him to be an auditor", "Make him a
Scientologist"
or "Make him a Class IV". Whatever you advertise as a generality, the
D of T
and instructors must, in their own minds think of making a student
into an
auditor that can do certain definite things, such as "run an assist,
do 8C,
do trio, run havingness". Then all training culminates in a skill and
so can
have a definite ending for both the student and instructor.
The other knowledge that makes an auditor and a Scientologist is
of course
strung out over these courses.
HGCs
HGCs MAY OFFER ONLY WHAT THEIR STAFF AUDITORS CAN DELIVER.
If the staff auditors are trained to certain processes the HGC
can offer
them. If the staff auditors are not trained to certain processes, they
can't be
offered.
PART TIME STAFF
Clarifying the position of "consulting auditors":
NO HGC MAY "OCCASIONALLY" EMPLOY AUDITORS.
This means exactly that an HGC auditor is a staff auditor all
the time,
week after week, or he isn't ever used. The confusion on this is the
definition
of "part time".
A "part-time" auditor is one who works part of the working week
every week
for the organization and always the same part of the working week.
AN AUDITOR WHO HAS AN OUTSIDE AUDITING PRACTICE MAY NOT BE AN
HGC AUDITOR
OR STAFF MEMBER.
STAFF MEMBERS MAY NOT AUDIT OUTSIDE PCS OR RECEIVE MONEY FOR
AUDITING
STUDENTS OR PCS OUTSIDE THE ORG AND MUST BE BROUGHT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE
COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE IF FOUND TO BE DOING SO.
For a staff member to do outside auditing for pay is very
serious and
can lead at once to an org's collapse (and has done so).
CONSULTING AUDITORS
For an organization to hire an auditor "when a pc is available"
is a
grave source of
42
trouble. The org is not able to train such staff or hold a standard
and acts
only as a procurer of pcs for field auditors. The public stays away
from such
HGCs in droves by actual test. The practice is called "Hiring
Consulting
auditors". It is forbidden.
It stems from a misguided effort to hold up units. It does hold
them up
for a while and then collapses the org.
It is unfair to the field auditor since he is just kept hanging
on in some
cases.
When this policy barring consulting auditors was first issued,
it was not
meant to include "part time" staff. Part time staff is usually
composed of non-
practising Scientologists who audit week-end or evening pcs for the
org and are
on units every week, rain or shine. I am sorry if any ARC Breaks were
caused.
ASSIGNING AUDITING TIMES
THE REGISTRAR MAY NOT ASSIGN TIMES FOR AUDITING.
The most insidious practice the Registrar can drift into (next
to not
signing up anyone) is selling times of audit.
The Registrar has no business in that department.
The Registrar sells quantities of auditing and refuses to
promise when.
This, the Registrar must say, is a technical matter and up to the D of
P.
THE DIRECTOR OF PROCESSING MUST NOT ASSIGN AUDITING AT LESS
HOURS THAN
l2-1/2 PER WEEK.
Exception: Where a special programme of 5 hour assists if being
sold, the
policy becomes "except not less than 5 hours per week for assists".
It is unfair to the pc to do the psycho-analytic nonsense of an
hour or
two a week as it doesn't even catch up with his PTPs and so wastes all
his
auditing.
Further an org can go broke doing this. Its staff auditors are
so strung
out in their assignments that they don't turn in a week's worth of
work yet draw
full units. It's a sure road to low units and collapse to go psycho-
analyst on
us and let the public buy an hour or two a week. Crazy in fact. I've
seen it
happen with fantastic upsets. The idea gets around: the public hasn't
"got the
time". for 25 hour intensives. It's just hearsay. In actual fact if
the D of P says, "Look here, you won't get any good out of an hour a week.
Just handling
your current problems will eat up your benefits. Take a week off and
get 25
hours" 80% of them will. The rest, the D of P says "All right, it's 2
1/2 hours
a night for 5 nights (or 121/2 hours over the week-end)." And they
will do one or
the other.
AN HGC PC IS ENTITLED TO A CERTIFIED AUDITOR.
The above is long standing policy.
AN HGC STAFF AUDITOR MAY AUDIT ONLY PROCESSES WITH WHICH HE IS
SURE HE
CAN GET RESULTS.
The above policy is a new stress on an old idea. The moral is,
run staff
training courses to get staff auditors up to running higher levels.
ONE WEEK'S PROCESSING (25 HOURS) SHOULD COST AN AVERAGE MONTH'S
PAY
(AS IN TRAINING).
But processing of a special nature at higher levels can be
charged at
higher rates.
No policies or programmes not specifically changed by the above
are
changed. All other policies remain in force.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: A complete copy of this Policy Letter entitled Policies:
Dissemination and Programmes can be found in Volume 2, page 41.
It was modified by HCO P/L 19 October 1964, Pricing Formulas,
Volume 3, page 95, which was later cancelled by HCO P/L 18 April
1965, Prices Lowered because of New Organization Streamline, Volume
3, page 93.]
43
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1965
REISSUED 15 JUNE 1970
Remimeo
Sthil Students (Reissued 28, 7.73 to correct word on p. 48,
Assn/Org Sec Hat para 2. [Change in this type style.])
HCO Sec Hat
Case Sup Hat
Ds of P Hat
Ds of T Hat
Staff Member Hat
Franchise
(issued May 1965)
Note: Neglect of this Pol Ltr has caused great hardship on staffs,
has cost
countless millions and made it necessary in 1970 to engage in an all
out
International effort to restore basic Scientology over the world.
Within 5 years
after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation had almost
destroyed
orgs. "Quickie grades" entered in and denied gain to tens of thousands
of cases.
Therefore actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are HIGH
CRIMES
resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and EXECUTIVES. It is not
"entirely a
tech matter" as its neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump.
IT IS THE
BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it.
ALL LEVELS
KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check
on all personnel and new personnel
as taken on.
We have some time since passed the point of achieving uniformly
workable
technology.
The only thing nowis getting the technology applied.
If you can't get the technology applied then you can't deliver
what's
promised. It's as simple as that. If you can get the technology
applied, you can
deliver what's promised.
The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs is
"no
results". Trouble spots occur only where there are "no results".
Attacks from
governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or
"bad
results".
Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its ultimate
success
is assured if the technology is applied.
So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the Case
Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff members to get the
correct
technology applied.
Getting the correct technology applied consists of:
One: Having the correct technology.
Two: Knowing the technology.
Three: Knowing it is correct.
Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.
Five: Applying the technology.
Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied.
Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.
Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.
44
Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect
technology.
Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.
One above has been done.
Two has been achieved by many.
Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct
technology in a
proper manner and observing that it works that way.
Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the
world.
Five is consistently accomplished daily.
Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently.
Seven is done by a few but is a weak point.
Eight is not worked on hard enough.
Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not quite
bright.
Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity.
Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are the only places Scientology can
bog down in
any area.
The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak certainty
that it
works in Three above can lead to weakness in Seven, Eight, Nine and
Ten. (b)
Further, the not-too-bright have a bad point on the button Self-
Importance. (c)
The lower the IQ, the more the individual is shut off from the fruits
of
observation. (d) The service facs of people make them defend
themselves against
anything they confront good or bad and seek to make it wrong. (e) The
bank seeks
to knock out the good and perpetuate the bad.
Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be very
alert to
Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
In all the years I have been engaged in research I have kept my
comm lines
wide open for research data. I once had the idea that a group. could
evolve
truth. A third of a Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea.
Willing as
I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of suggestions
(less than
twenty) had long run value and none were major or basic; and when I
did accept
major or basic suggestions and used them, we went astray and I
repented and
eventually had to "eat crow".
On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands of
suggestions
and writings which, if accepted and acted upon, would have resulted in
the
complete destruction of all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So
I know
what a group of people will do and how insane they will go in
accepting
unworkable "technology". By actual record the percentages are about
twenty to
100,000 that a group of human beings will dream up bad technology to
destroy
good technology. As we could have gotten along without suggestions,
then, we had
better steel ourselves to continue to do so now that we have made it.
This point
will, of course, be attacked as "unpopular", "egotistical" and
"undemocratic".
It very well may be. But it is also a survival point. And I don't see
that
popular measures, self-abneg�tion and democracy have done anything for
Man
but push him further into the mud. Currently, popularity endorses
degraded
novels, self-abnegation has filled the South East Asian jungles with
stone
idols and corpses, and democracy has given us inflation and income
tax.
Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if the
group
had not supported me in many ways I could not have discovered it
either. But
it remains that if in its formative stages it was not discovered by a
group,
then group efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or
successfully
alter it in the future. I can only say this now that it is done. There
remains,
of course, group tabulation or co-ordination of what has been done,
which will
be valuable only so long as it does not seek to alter basic principles
and
successful applications.
The contributions that were worth while in this period of
forming the
technology were help in the form of friendship, of defense, of
organization,
of dissemination, of application, of advices on results and of
finance. These
were great contributions and
45
were, and are, appreciated. Many thousands contributed in this way and
made
us what we are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the
broad
picture.
We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came to
rise
above the bank. We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-
the
group left to its own devices would not have evolved Scientology but
with
wild dramatization of the bank called "new ideas" would have wiped it
out.
Supporting this is the fact that Man has never before evolved workable
mental
technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he did evolve-
psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock treatment, whips, duress,
punishment,
etc, ad infinitum.
So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever good
luck and
good sense, and refuse to sink back into it again. See that Seven,
Eight, Nine
and Ten above are ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped.
Relax them,
get reasonable about it and we will perish.
So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with all
suggestions, I have not failed on Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten in areas
I could
supervise closely. But it's not good enough for just myself and a few
others to
work at this.
Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten has been
relaxed
the whole organizational area has failed. Witness Elizabeth, N.J.,
Wichita, the
early organizations and groups. They crashed only because I no longer
did Seven,
Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed up, you saw the
obvious
"reasons" for failure. But ahead of that they ceased to deliver and
that
involved them in other reasons.
The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank. Thetans
without
banks have different responses. They only have their banks in common.
They agree
then only on bank principles. Person to person the bank is identical.
So
constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad agreement in a
human
group. An individual must rise above an avid craving for agreement
from a
humanoid group to get anything decent done. The bank-agreement has
been what has
made Earth a Hell-and if you were looking for Hell and found Earth, it
would
certainly serve. War, famine, agony and disease has been the lot of
Man. Right
now the great governments of Earth have developed the means of frying
every Man,
Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank. That is the result of
Collective
Thought Agreement. The decent, pleasant things on this planet come
from
individual actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group
Idea. For
that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked by "public opinion"
media. Yet
there is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves.
Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the bank
and then, as
a group of freed beings, achieve freedom and reason. It is only the
aberrated
group, the mob, that is destructive.
When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you are
working for
the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely, surely (a) introduce
incorrect
technology and swear by it, (b) apply technology as incorrectly as
possible, (c)
open the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage incorrect
application.
It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual
nothing. It's
the Bank that says we must fail.
So just don't play that game. Do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten and
you will
knock out of your road all the future thorns.
Here's an actual example in which a senior executive had to
interfere
because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told Instructor A to have
Auditor B run
Process X on Preclear C. Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that
"It didn't
work". Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't really believe
in Seven,
Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor A told the Case Supervisor "Process
X didn't
work on Preclear C". Now this strikes directly at each of One to Six
above in
Preclear C, Auditor B, Instructor A and the Case Supervisor. It opens
the door
to the introduction of "new technology" and to failure.
What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor B's
throat,
that's all that happened. This is what he should have done: Grabbed
the
Auditor's report and looked it over. When a higher executive on this
case did so
she found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that Process X
increased
Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for the session but that near
session end
Auditor B Qed and Aed with a
46
cognition and abandoned Process X while it still gave high TA and went
off
running one of Auditor B's own manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear
C.
Auditor B's IQ on examination turned Out to be about 75. Instructor A
was found
to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate anyone, even a
lunatic. The
Case Supervisor was found to be "too busy with admin to have any time
for actual
cases";
All right, there's an all too typical example. The Instructor
should have
done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. This would have begun this way.
Auditor B:
"That process X didn't work." Instructor A: "What exactly did you do
wrong?"
Instant attack. "Where's your auditor's report for the session? Good.
Look here,
you were getting a lot of TA when you stopped Process X. What did you
do?" Then
the Pc wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these would
have
retained certainty.
In a year, I had four instances in one small group where. the
correct
process recommended was reported not to have worked. But on review
found that
each one had (a) increased the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had
been
falsely reported as unworkable. Also, despite this abuse, in each of
these four
cases the recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they were
reported
as not having worked!
Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the more
deadly
as every time instruction in correct technology is flubbed, then the
resulting
error, uncorrected in the auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that.
auditor
audits thereafter. So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more
important in a
course than in supervision of cases.
Here's an example: A rave recommendation is given a graduating student
"because
he gets more TA on pcs than any other student on the course!" Figures
of 435 TA
divisions a session are reported. "Of course his model session is poor
but it's
just a knack he has" is also included in the recommendation. A careful
review is
undertaken because nobody at levels 0 to IV is going to get that much
TA on pcs.
It is found that this student was never taught to read an E-Meter TA
dial! And
no instructor observed his handling of a meter and it was not
discovered that he
"overcompensated" nervously, swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond
where it
needed to go to place the needle at "set". So everyone was about to
throw away
standard processes and model session because this one student "got
such
remarkable TA". They only read the reports and listened to the brags
and never
looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making slightly
less than
average gain, impeded by a rough model session and misworded
processes. Thus,
what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was hidden under a
lot of
departures and errors.
I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy course and
running a lot
of off-beat whole .track on other students after course hours. The
academy
students were in a state of electrification on all these new
experiences and
weren't quickly brought under control and the student himself never
was given
the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten so they stuck. Subsequently,
this
student prevented another squirrel from being straightened out and his
wife died
of cancer resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at
that moment
could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the life of a girl. But
no, students
had a right to do whatever they pleased.
Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering
Scientology) only
comes about from non-comprehension. Usually the non-comprehension is
not of
Scientology but some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid
practice which in
its turn was not understood.
When people can't get results from what they think is standard
practice,
they can be counted upon to squirrel to some degree: The most trouble
in the
past two years came from orgs where an executive in each could not
assimilate
straight Scientology. Under instruction in Scientology they were
unable to
define terms or demonstrate examples of principles. And the orgs where
they were
got into plenty of trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened
out easily
because neither one of these people could or would duplicate
instructions.
Hence, a debacle resulted in two places, directly traced to failures
of
instruction earlier. So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and
his
Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be merciless in
getting Four,
Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten into effective action. That one student,
dumb and
impossible though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some
day be the
cause of untold upset because nobody was interested enough to make
sure
Scientology got home to him.
With what we know now, there is no student we enrol who cannot
be properly
trained. As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress
and should
turn the
47
sluggards inside out personally. No system will do it, only you or me
with our
sleeves rolled up can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only
do it on
an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's slow =
something is
awful wrong. Take fast action to correct it, Don't wait until next
week. By then
he's got other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with
their good
sense appealed to and wisdom shining, graduate them in such a state of
shock
they'll have nightmares if they contemplate squirreling. Then
experience will
gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better than to
chase
butterflies when they should be auditing.
When somebody enrols, consider he or she has joined up for the
duration of
the universe-never permit an "open-minded" approach. If they're going
to quit
let them quit fast. If they enrolled, they're aboard, and if they're
aboard,
they're here on the same terms as the rest of us-win or die in the
attempt.
Never let them be half-minded about being Scientologists. The finest
organizations in history have been tough, dedicated organizations. Not
one
namby-pamby bunch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made anything.
It's a
tough universe. The social veneer makes it seem mild. But only the
tigers
survive-and even they have a hard time. We'll survive because we are
tough and
are dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes more
and more
tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are afraid to offend, scared
to
enforce, we don't make students into good Scientologists and that lets
everybody
down. When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that
wandering doubt in
her eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and she'll win and we'll all
win. Humour
her and we all die a little. The proper instruction attitude is,
"You're here so
you're a Scientologist. Now we're going to make you into an expert
auditor no
matter what happens. We'd rather have you dead than incapable."
Fit that into the economics of the situation and lack of
adequate time and
you see the cross we have to bear.
But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the more
economics
and time we will have to do our job. And the only things which can
prevent us
from getting that big fast are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in
mind and
we'll be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be less
and less.
Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us grow less.
So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or the
High
Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and practise our
technology.
An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge with
ferocity
instances of "unworkability". They must uncover what did happen, what
was run
and what was done or not done.
If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all by
making sure
of all the rest.
We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't cute
or
something to do for lack of something better.
The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman and
Child on
it, and your own destiny for the next endless trillions of years
depend on what
you do here and now with and in Scientology.
This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting out of
the trap
now, we may never again have another chance.
Remember, this is our first chance to do so in all the endless
trillions
of years of the past. Don't muff it now because it seems unpleasant or
unsocial
to do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
Do them and we'll win.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jw.rr.nt.ka.mes.rd
Copyright ($) 1965, 1970, 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
48
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1965
(Reissued on 7 June 1967, with the word
Remimeo "instructor" replaced by "supervisor".)
All Hats
BPI
SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY
For some years we have had a word "squirreling". It means
altering
Scientology, off-beat practices. It is a bad thing. I have found a way
to
explain why.
Scientology is a workable system. This does not mean it is the
best
possible system or a perfect system. Remember and use that definition.
Scientology is a workable System.
In fifty thousand years of history on this planet alone, Man
never
evolved a workable system. It is doubtful if, in foreseeable history,
he will
ever evolve another.
Man is caught in a huge and complex labyrinth. To get out of it
requires
that he follow the closely taped path of Scientology.
Scientology will take him out of the labyrinth. But only if he
follows
the exact markings in the tunnels.
It has taken me a third of a century in this lifetime to tape
this route
out.
It has been proven that efforts by Man to find different routes
came to
nothing. It is also a clear fact that the route called Scientology
does lead
out of the labyrinth. Therefore it is a workable System, a route that
can be
traveled.
What would you think of a guide who, because his party said it
was dark
and the road rough and who said another tunnel looked better,
abandoned the
route he knew would lead out and led his party to a lost nowhere in
the dark.
You'd think he was a pretty wishy-washy guide.
What would you think of a supervisor who let a student depart
from
procedure the supervisor knew worked. You'd think he was a pretty
wishy-washy
supervisor.
What would happen in a labyrinth if the guide let some girl stop
in a
pretty canyon and left her there forever to contemplate the rocks?
You'd think
he was a pretty heartless guide. You'd expect him to say at least,
"Miss, those
rocks may be pretty, but the road out doesn't go that way."
All right, how about an auditor who abandons the procedure which
will make
his preclear eventually clear just because the preclear had a
cognition?
People have following the route mixed up with "the right to have
their own
ideas." Anyone is certainly entitled to have opinions and ideas and
cognitions-
so long as these do not bar the route out for self and others.
Scientology is a workable system. It white tapes the road out of
the
labyrinth. If there were no white tapes marking the right tunnels, Man
would
just go on wandering around and around the way he has for eons,
darting off on
wrong roads, going in circles, ending up in the sticky dark, alone.
Scientology, exactly and correctly followed, takes the person up
and out
of the mess,
So when you see somebody having a ball getting everyone to take
peyote
because
49
it restimulates prenatals, know he is pulling people off the route.
Realize
he is squirreling. He isn't following the route.
Scientology is a new thing-it is a road out. There has not been
one. Not
all the salesmanship in the world can make a bad route a proper route.
And an
awful lot of bad routes are being sold. Their end product is further
slavery,
more darkness, more misery.
Scientology is the only workable System Man has. It has already
taken
people toward higher I.Q., better lives and all that. No other system
has. So
realize that it has no competitor.
Scientology is a workable system. It has the route taped. The
search is
done. Now the route only needs to be walked.
So put the feet of students and preclears on that route. Don't
let them
off of it no matter how fascinating the side roads seem to them. And
move them
on up and out.
Squirreling is today destructive of a workable system.
Don't let your party down. By whatever means, keep them on the
route.
And they'll be free. if you don't, they won't.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1965, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
50
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 FEBRUARY 1965
Remimeo
DELIVER
Now that we can deliver, the first thought of every staff member
in every
Org from Saint Hill through the main orgs down to the smallest
Franchise Office
should be to deliver Scientology training and processing to every
person
responding to their promotion. Books and all other items should be
delivered
effectively and rapidly to buyers. Certificates should be delivered to
all who
earn them. Classification should be delivered quickly to those who can
pass.
The action of Promotion is to offer as many as can be reached
something
each of those reached will want and buy.
After Promotion obtains response, one must deliver. That means
good case
gains to preclears and students, good reality and useful knowledge and
skill to
every student.
Delivery, if not done swiftly and cheerfully and effectively,
balls up the
lines, retards growth and keeps everyone marking time.
The first job of the books personnel is to deliver books
ordered. There is
no other action to take. Just deliver. Keep the invoice line simple by
simply
invoicing everything ordered and note whether paid or not. In shipping
books or
such items not paid for, request the sum owing while holding the first
invoice
and when it comes let invoicing make a new invoice showing payment and
let
shipping relate it to the old. Refund overpayments regardless of what
the
customer said unless it's a donation. Keep book shipping simple.
Deliver books.
Be sure books are on hand and deliver them. That's all one does in
Books.
When someone buys training, sign the person up and deliver the
training
and a good case gain too.
When someone buys processing, give them the processing called
for at the
pc's level whether you advertise you will or not and deliver a case
gain and a
completed level.
Deliver. When promotion has promoted a response, don't get
chatty with the
response. Just tell the person what it is, how much it costs, how easy
it is and
when he should get it; or to come in and get it, and deliver.
Promote, organize and deliver.
We can now deliver technically.
You don't have to "make Scientology work". You don't have "to
alter it so
it will work". You don't have to dream it up. All you've got to do is
be skilled
in doing exactly what's taught and you'll deliver handsomely. You can
deliver
it, so deliver it.
On a pc who has never been processed, do Level 0. Give him or
her an HCO
Board of Review certificate as a pc for that level when it is
complete; when a
pc has Level 0 Grade certificate, do I. Etc. Boot them up as fast as
you can. Do
only what the Levels are. Issue a certificate when they're all flat on
the TA
for that grade.
On people who have been scattered through one or another of the
levels,
finish up
51
anything missed in the lowest level, then the next level, then the
next, etc.
When a pc has completed IV finally, be sure your staff can do VI on
him.
To get an org or individual to deliver effectively, remove the
distractions from the delivery channel, remove the barriers to
delivery,
detect and get rid of the non compliance to orders to deliver. And
deliver
pure Scientology, effectively.
Get a move on. Learn what's to be delivered and deliver it.
Same with a course. Deliver it and certify you have. That's all.
You're selling wins. Deliver them.
The whole human race is about to start going up. They'll move to
the
degree you deliver and no faster. So let's get the show on the road.
Nobody now has to do anything arduous. Just find people, make
them
want and pay for delivery and then deliver.
That's all.
Let's go.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright(c)l965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
52
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo
HCO Sec Hat HCO JUSTICE DATA RE ACADEMY & HGC
Tech Sec Hat
D of P Hat HANDLING THE SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
D of T Flat THE BASIS OF INSANITY
The suppressive person (whom we've called a Merchant of Fear or
Chaos
Merchant and which we can now technically call the suppressive person)
can't
stand the idea of Scientology. If people became better, the
suppressive person
would have lost. The suppressive person answers this by attacking
covertly or
overtly Scientology. This thing is, he thinks, his mortal enemy since
it undoes
his (or her) "good work" in putting people down where they should be.
There are three "operations" such a case seeks to engage upon
regarding
Scientology: (a) to disperse it, (b) to try to crush it and (c) to
pretend it
didn't exist.
Dispersal would consist of several things such as attributing
its source
to others and altering its processes or structure.
If you feel a bit dispersed reading this Policy Letter, then
realize it is
about a being whose whole "protective colouration" is to disperse
others and so
remain invisible. Such people generalize all entheta and create ARC
Breaks
madly.
The second (b) is done by covert or overt means. Covertly a
suppressive
person leaves the org door unlocked, loses the E-Meters, runs up
fantastic
bills, and energetically and unseen seeks to pull out the plug and get
Scientology poured down the drain. We, poor fools, consider all this
just "human
error" or "stupidity". We rarely realize that such actions, far from
being
accidents, are carefully thought out. The proof that this is so is
simple. If we
run down the source of these errors we wind up with only one or two
people in
the whole group. Now isn't it odd that the majority of errors that
kept the
group enturbulated were attributable to a minority of persons present?
Even a
very "reasonable" person could not make anything else out of that
except that it
was very odd and indicated that the minority mentioned were interested
in
smashing the group and that the behaviour was not common to the whole
group-
meaning it isn't "normal" behaviour.
These people aren't Communists or Fascists or any other ists.
They are
just very sick people. They easily become parts of suppressive groups
such as
Communists or Fascists because these groups, like criminals, are
suppressive.
The Suppressive Person is hard to spot because of the dispersal
factor
mentioned 'above. One looks at them and has his attention dispersed by
their
"everybody is bad".
The Suppressive Person who is visibly seeking to knock out
people or
Scientology is easy to see. He or she is making such a fuss about it.
The
attacks are quite vicious and full of lies. But even here when the
Suppressive
Person exists on the "other side" of a potential trouble source,
visibility
is not good. One sees a case going up and down. On the other side of
that case,
out of the auditor's view, is the Suppressive Person.
The. whole trick they use is to generalize entheta. "Everybody
is bad."
"The Russians are all bad." "Everybody hates you." "The People versus
John Doe"
on warrants. "The masses." "The Secret Police will get you."
Suppressive groups use the ARC Break mechanisms of generalizing
entheta
so it seems "everywhere".
The Suppressive Person is a specialist in making others ARC
Break with
generalized entheta that is mostly lies.
He or she is also a no-gain-case.
So avid are such for the smashing of others by covert or Overt
means
that their case is bogged and won't move under routine processing.
53
The technical fact is that they have a huge problem, long gone
and no
longer known even to themselves which they use hidden or forthright
vicious
acts continually to "handle". They do not act to solve the environment
they
are in. They are solving one environment, yesterday's, in which they
are stuck.
The only reason the insane were hard to understand is that they
are
handling situations which no longer exist. The situation probably
existed at
one time. They think they have to hold their own, with overts against
a non-
existent enemy to solve a non-existent problem.
Because their overts are continuous they have withholds.
Since such a person has withholds, he or she can't communicate
freely to
as-is the block on the track that keeps them in some yesterday. Hence,
a "no-
case-gain".
That alone is the way to locate a Suppressive Person. By viewing
the case.
Never judge such a person by their conduct. That is too difficult.
Judge by no-
case-gains. Don't even use tests.
One asks these questions:
1. Will the person permit auditing at all? or
2. Does their history of routine auditing reveal any gains?
If (1) is "No", one is safe to treat the person as suppressive.
It is not
always correct but it is always safe. Some errors will be made but it
is better
to make them than to take a chance on it. When people refuse auditing
they are
(a) a potential trouble source (connected to a Suppressive Person);
(b) a person
with a big dis creditable withhold; (c) a Suppressive Person or (d)
have had the
bad luck to be "audited" too often by a Suppressive Person or (e) have
been
audited by an untrained auditor or one "trained" by a Suppressive
Person.
[The last category (e) (untrained auditor) is rather slight but
(d)
(audited by a Suppressive Person) can have been pretty serious,
resulting in
continual ARC Breaks during which auditing was pressed on without
regard to the
ARC Break.]
Thus there are several possibilities where somebody refuses
auditing.
One has to sort them out in an HGC and handle the right one. But HCO
by policy
simply treats the person with the same admin policy procedure as that
used on a
Suppressive Person and lets HGC sort it out. Get that difference-it's
"with the
same admin policy procedure as" not "the same as".
For treating a person "the same as" a Suppressive Person when he
or she
is not only adds to the confusion. One treats a real Suppressive
Person pretty
rough. One has to handle the bank.
As to (2) here is the real test and the only valid test: Does
their
history of routine auditing reveal any gains?
If the answer is NO then there is your Suppressive Person, loud
and very
unclear!
That is the test.
There are several ways of detecting. When fair auditors or good
ones have
had to vary routine procedure or do unusual things on this case in an
effort to
make it gain, when there are lots of notes from Ds of P in the folder
saying do
this-do that-you know that this case was trouble.
This means it was one of three things: 1. a potential trouble
source 2. a
person with a big withhold 3. a Suppressive Person.
If despite all that trouble and care, the case did not gain-or
if the case
simply didn't gain despite auditing no matter how many years or
intensives, then
you've caught your Suppressive Person.
That's the boy. Or the girl.
This case performs continual calculating covert hostile acts
damaging to
others. This case puts the enturbulence and upset into the
environment, breaks
the chairs,
54
messes up the rugs and spoils the traffic flow with "goofs" done
intentionally.
One should lock criminals out of the environment if one wants
security.
But one first has to locate the criminal. Don't lock everybody out
because you
can't find the criminal.
The cyclic case (gains and collapses routinely) is connected to
a
Suppressive Person. We have policy on that.
The case that continually pleads "hold my hand I am so ARC
broken" is just
somebody with a big withhold, not an ARC Break.
The Suppressive Person just gets no-case-gain on routine student
auditing.
This person is actively suppressing Scientology. If such will
sit still
and pretend to be audited the suppression is by hidden hostile acts
which
include:
1. Chopping up auditors;
2. Pretending withholds which are actually criticisms;
3. Giving out "data" about their past lives and/or whole track that
really
holds such subjects up to scorn and makes people who do remember
wince;
4. Chopping up orgs;
5. Alter-ising technology to mess it up;
6. Spreading rumours about prominent persons in Scientology;
7. Attributing Scientology to other sources;
8. Criticizing auditors as a group;
9. Rolling up Dev-T, off policy, off origin, off line;
10. Giving fragmentary or generalized reports about entheta that
cave
people in-and isn't actual;
11. Refusing to repair ARC Breaks;
12. Engaging in discreditable sexual acts (also true of potential
trouble
sources);
13. Reporting a session good when the pc went bad;
14. Reporting a session bad when the pe went up in tone;
15. Snapping terminals with lecturers and executives to make
critical
remarks or spread ARC Break type "news" to them;
16. Failing to relay comm or report;
17. Making an org go to pieces (note one uses "making" not
"letting");
18. Committing small criminal acts around the org;
19. Making "mistakes" which get their seniors in trouble;
20. Refusing to abide by policy;
21. Non-compliance with instructions;
22. Alter-is of instructions or orders so that the programme fouls
up;
23. Hiding data that is vital to prevent upsets;
24. Altering orders to make a senior look bad;
25. Organizing revolts or mass protest meetings;
26. Snarling about Justice.
And so on. One does not use the catalogue, however, one only
uses this
one fact-no case gain by routine auditing over a longish period.
This is the fellow that makes life miserable for the rest of us.
This is
the one who overworks executives. This is the auditor killer. This is
the course
enturbulator or pc killer.
There's the cancer. Burn it out.
----------
In short, you begin to see that it's this one who is the only
one who
makes harsh discipline seem necessary. The rest of the staff suffers
when one
or two of these is present.
55
One hears a whine about "process didn't work" or sees an alter-
is of
tech. Go look. You'll find it now and then leads to a Suppressive
Person
inside or outside the Org.
Now that one knows who it is, one can handle it.
But more than that, I can now crack this case!
The technology is useful in all cases, of course. But only this
cracks
the no-gain-case'.
The person is in a mad, howling situation of some yesteryear and
is
"handling it" by committing overt acts today. I say condition of
yesteryear
but the case thinks it's today.
Yes, you're right. They are nuts. The spin bins are full of
either them
or their victims. There's no other real psycho in a spin bin!
What? That means we've cracked insanity itself? That's right.
And it's
given us the key to the Suppressive Person and his or her effect on
the
environment. This is the multitude of "types" of insanity of the 19th
century
psychiatrisE All in one. Schizophrenia, paranoia, fancy names galore.
Only one
other type exists-the person the Suppressive Person got "at". This is
the
"manic-depressive" a type who is up one day and down the next. This is
the
Potential Trouble Source gone mad. But these are in a minority in the
spin bin,
usually put there by Suppressive Persons and not crazy at all! The
real mad ones
are the Suppressive Persons. They are the only psychos.
Over simplification? No indeed. I can prove it! We could empty
the spin
bins now. If we want to. But we have better uses for technology than
saving a
lot of Suppressive Persons who themselves act only to scuttle the rest
of us.
You see, when they get down to no-case-gain where a routine
process won't
bite, they can no longer as-is their daily life so it all starts to
stack up
into a horror. They "solve" this horror by continuous covert acts
against their
surroundings and associates. After a while the covert ones don't seem
to hold
off the fancied "horror" and they commit some senseless violence in
broad
daylight-or collapse-and so they can get identified as insane and are
lugged off
to the spin bin.
Anybody can "get mad" and bust a few chairs when a Suppressive
Person goes
too far. But there's traceable sense to it. Getting mad doesn't make a
madman.
It's damaging actions that have no sensible detectable reasons that's
the trail
of madness. Any thetan can get angry. Only a madman damages without
reason.
All actions have their lower scale discreditable mockery. The
difference
is, does one get over his anger? The no-case-gain of course can't. He
or she
stays misemotional and adds each new burst to the fire. It never gets
less. It
grows. And a long way from all Suppressive Persons are violent. They
are more
likely to look resentful.
A Suppressive Person can get to one solid dispassionate state of
damaging
things. Here is the accident prone, the home wrecker, the group
wrecker.
Now here one must realize something. The Suppressive Person
finds outlet
for his or her unexpressed rage by carefully needling those they are
connected
with into howling anger.
You see the people around them get dragged into this long gone
incident
by mistaken identity. And it is a maddening situation to be
continually mis-
identified, accused, worked on, doubled crossed. For one is not the
being the
Suppressive Person supposes. The Suppressive Person's world is pretty
hard to
live around. And even ordinarily cheerful people often blow up under
the strain.
So be careful who you call the Suppressive Person. The person
connected
with a Suppressive Person is liable to be only visible rage in sight!
You have some experience of this-the mousey little woman who
rarely
changes expression and is so righteous connected to somebody who now
and then
goes into a frenzy.
56
How to tell them apart? Easy! Just ask this question:
Which. gets a case gain easily?
Well, it's even simpler than that! Put the two on an E-Meter.
Don't do
anything but read the dial and needle. The Suppressive one has the
high stuck
T.A. The other has a lower T.A. Simple?
Not all Suppressive Persons have high T.A. The T.A. can be
anywhere
especially very low (1.0). But the needle is weird. It is stuck tight
or it
RSes without reason (the PC wearing no rings to cause an RS).
Suppressive Persons also can have the "dead" thetan clear read!
You see people around a Suppressive Person Q and A and disperse.
They
seek to "get even" with the Suppressive Person and often exhibit the
same
symptoms temporarily.
Sometimes two Suppressive PersOns are found together. So one
can't always
say which is the Suppressive Person in a pair. The usual Combination
IS the
Suppressive Person and the Potential Trouble Source.
However you don't need to guess about it or observe their
conduct.
For this poor soul can no longer as-is easily. Too many overts.
Too many
withholds. Stuck in an incident that they call "present time".
Handling a
problem that does not exist. Supposing those around are the personnel
in their
own delirium.
They look all right. They sound reasonable. They are often
clever. But
they are solid poison. They can't as-is anything. Day by day their
pile grows.
Day by day their new overts and Withholds pin them down tighter. They
aren't
here. But they sure can wreck the place.
There is the true psycho.
And he or she is dying before your very eyes. Kind of horrible.
The resolution of the case is a clever application of problems
processes,
never o/w. What was the condition? How did you handle it? is the key
type of
process.
I don't know what the percentage of these are in a society. I
know only
that they. made up about 10% of any group so far observed. The data is
obscured
by the fact that they ARC Break others and make them misemotional-thus
one of
them seems to be, by contagion, half a dozen such.
Therefore simple inspection of conduct does not reveal the
Suppressive
Person. Only a case folder puts the seal on it. No-Case-Gain by
routine
processes.
However this test too may soon become untrustworthy for now we
can crack
them by a special approach. However we will also generally use the
same approach
on routine cases as it makes cases go upward fast and we may catch the
Suppressive Person accidentally and cure him or her before we are
aware of it.
And that would be wonderful.
But still we'll have such on our lines in Justice matters from
now on. So
it's good to know all about them, how they are identified, how to
handle.
HCO must handle such cases as per the HCO Justice Codes on
Suppressive
Acts when they blow Scientology or seek to suppress Scientologists or
orgs. One
should study up on these.
The Academy should be careful of this and report them to HCO
promptly (as
they would potential trouble sources or withholds that won't be
delivered). The
Academy must not fool about with Suppressive Persons. It's a sure way
to
deteriorate a course and cave in students.
57
POLICY
When an Academy finds it has a Potential Trouble Source, a
"withholdy
case that ARC Breaks easily" or a Suppressive Person enrolled on a
course or a
blow the Academy must call for HCO Department of Inspection & Reports,
Justice
section. This can be any HCO personnel available, even the HCO Sec.
The HCO representative must wear some readily identified HCO
symbol and
must take a report sheet with a carbon copy on a clip board.
HCO must have present other staff adequate to handle possible
physical
violence.
The student, if still present, must be taken to a place where an
interview
will not stop or enturbulate a class, by Tech Division personnel. This
can be
any Tech Division office, empty auditing room or empty classroom. The
point is
to localize the commotion and not stir up the whole Tech Division.
If Tech Division personnel is not available HCO can recruit
"other staff"
anywhere by simply saying "HCO requires you" and taking them into the
interview
place.
HCO has a report sheet for such matters, original and one copy
for Justice
files.
The HCO representative calls for the student's folder and looks
it over
quickly for TA action. If there is none (less than 10 divs/sess)
that's it. It
is marked on the report sheet, "No TA action in auditing" or "Little
TA". HCO is
not interested in what processes were run. Or why there is no TA. If
the course
requires no meters the folder is inspected for alter-is (which denotes
a rough
pc) or no case changes.
If there are no TA notations in the folder HCO should put the
person on a
meter, making sure the person is not wearing a ring. One asks no
questions,
merely reads the TA position and notes the needle and marks these in
the report
sheet. The Tone Arm will be very high (5 or above) or very low (2 or
less) or
dead thetan (2 or 3) and the needle would be an occasional RS or stuck
or sticky
if the person is a Suppressive Person. This is noted in the report
sheet.
If the folder or the student in question says he has had no case
gain this
is again confirming of a Suppressive Person.
If two of these three points (folder, meter, statement) indicate
a
Suppressive Person, HCO is looking for two possible students when so
called in-
the one who caused the upset and that student's coach or student's
auditor.
There very likely may be a Suppressive Person on the course that is
not this
student. Therefore one looks for that one too, the second one.
If a bit of questioning seems to reveal that the student's
auditor was
responsible, test that student too, and enter it on a second HCO
report form.
And order the other one to auditing at the student's own expense.
In short be alert. There's been an upset. There may be other
persons about
who caused it. Don't just concentrate on the student. There is a
condition on
the course that causes upsets. That is really all one knows.
When one walks in on it, find out why and what.
If the HCO tests indicate some doubt about either student being
a
Suppressive Person, HCO asks about a possible withhold and enters any
result on
the sheet and sends the students and sheet separately to the Tech
Division, Dept
of Estimation. The procedure is the same for a Suppressive Person but
is "a
withholdy pc who ARC Breaks easily" or simply "a withholdy PC" if no
ARC Breaks
are noted. "Auditing recommended".
But there is a third category for which HCO is very alert in
this
interview. And that is the POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE.
For this person may only be audited further if he or she
disconnects or
handles the Suppressive Person or group to which he or she is
connected and
can't be sent to the HGC or back to the course either until the status
is
cleared up.
58
If this seems the case, there is no point in continuing the
person in the
Tech Division and HCO takes over fully, applying the policy related to
Potential
Trouble Sources.
This type of case will probably not be dangerous but quite co-
operative,
and probably dazed by having to do something about his situation. He
or she has
been hammered with invalidation by a Suppressive Person and may be
rather wobbly
but if the Justice steps are taken exactly on policy there should be
no trouble.
HCO can take a Potential Trouble Source (but never a Suppressive
Person) out of
the Tech Division premises and back to HCO to complete such briefing.
Remember,
it is all one to us if the Potential Trouble Source handles it or not.
Until
it's handled or disconnected we don't want it around as it's just more
trouble
and the person will cave in if audited under those conditions
(connected to a
Suppressive Person or group).
A Suppressive Person found in an Academy is ordered to HGC
processing
always. And always at his or her own expense.
If the Suppressive Person won't buy auditing, or co-operate, HCO
follows
steps A to E in policy on Suppressive Persons in the Justice Codes;
HCO may be
assisted in this by Tech personnel.
The point is, the situation must be handled fully there and
then. The
student buys his auditing or gets A to E. There is no "We'll put you
on
probation in the course and if. . ." because I've not found it to
work. Auditing
or Suppressive Person A to E. Or both.
THE BLOWN STUDENT
The student however may have blown off the premises or he has
gone
entirely. On a minor, momentary blow, where all it took was the
student's
auditor and a few words to get the student back, the matter is not a
real blow.
But where the student leaves the premises in a blow or doesn't
turn up for
class, the Tech Division must send an Instructor and the student's
auditor over
to HCO Department of Inspection and Reports. An HCO representative
should go
with them at once to pick up the student.
The student is brought back with as little public commotion as
possible
and the procedure of HCO checkout, etc is followed as above.
THE GONE STUDENT
Where the student can't be gotten back (or in all such cases)
the real
cause may be a Suppressive Person in the Course itself, not the blown
student
or the upset student.
If the Suppressive Person is on the course (and is not the blown
student)
HCO will want to know this. In all such cases the one who caused the
environment
may not be the culprit.
The HCO representative calls for the blown student's case folder
and looks
for TA. If there is none or for some reason the student wasn't
audited, or if no
meters were used on that course, HCO seeks to find out what the case's
responses
were to processing.
If the case seemed to change or improve yet the student is gone,
HCO looks
over the blown student's ex-auditor for suppressive characteristics
such as
satisfaction the pc blew, critical statements about tech or
instructors, case
rough or difficult, lies about the circumstances, etc, and if such
signs are
present, HCO orders the blown student's ex-auditor to the HGC at the
student's
own expense.
If this interview with the blown student's auditor seems to
indicate a
Suppressive Person beyond any doubt UCO orders the student to the HGC
at the
student's own expense.
The blown student's course auditor will not be found usually to
be a
Potential Trouble Source as these are seldom bad or rough auditors, so
questions
about this possibility don't really apply.
59
But if this student (the blown student's auditor) is
Suppressive, it's HGC
or A to E. If the student gives on A to E he or she may be returned to
course or
to the HGC as HCO deems best.
----------
In all such cases where a Suppressive Person is found, watch out
for legal
repercussions by having reliable witnesses present during such
negotiations or
upsets and take liberal notes for possible Comm By. This is why there
also must
be an HCO representative handling it.
If there is no agreement to be audited and the student who is
found to be
a Suppressive Person will not respond to A to B (because student has
blown and
can't be found or because the student flatly refuses), the student is
considered
terminated.
A waiver or quit claim is given or sent the student stating:
Date
Place
I __________________________________having refused to abide by the
Codes of
(name and place of org) do hereby waive any further rights I may have
as a
Scientologist and in return for my course fee of I do hereby
quit
any claim I may have on (name of org) or any Scientologist personnel
or any
person or group or organization of Scientology.
Signed
2 Witnesses
Only when this is signed the student may have his course fee
returned,
but no other fees as he accepted that service.
The ex-student should realize this makes him Fair Game and
outside our
Justice Codes. He may not have recourse of any kind beyond refund. And
after
signing can only return to Scientology as per policy on Fair Game.
The HGC audits such a Suppressive Person sent to it on special
processes
specially issued by HCO B for Suppressive Persons. It will be found
that
adherence to these policies will make Academies very calm.
Note: Nothing in this policy letter waives or sets aside any
policy
concerning the auditing of known institutional cases in an HGC.
Persons with
histories of institutionalized insanity may not be audited in HGC.
L. RON
HUBBARD
P.S. If you've wondered if you are a Suppressive Person while reading
this-you
aren't! A Suppressive Person never does wonder, not for a moment! THEY
KNOW
THEY'RE SANE!
LRH:wmc.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME: The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME
will
cease. FAIR GAME may not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad
public
relations. This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatment or
handling
of an SP.
[From HCO P/L 21 October 1968, Volume 1, page 489.]
60
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1965
Remimeo Issue II
All lnstructors' Hats
HCO Personnel Hats DIVISION 4
HGC Auditors' Hats TECHNICAL
Sthil Executives
Sthil Instructors ACADEMIES RELATION TO HCO JUSTICE
Sthil Staff Auditors STUDENT TRAINING
THE NO-GAIN-CASE STUDENT
Instructors MUST be alert for no-case-change cases on course and
for
"Withholdy pcs who ARC Break easily", "blowy students" and "unstable
gains"
cases.
Even indifferent auditing on even a haphazard course causes good
case
gains.
The minority group of no-case-change in routine course auditing
and
"withholdy" is very minor. These categories contain all the students
who
disturb your course, are insolent to instructors, rant against rules,
etc.
You are under no orders from me that you must please them but
you are
under orders to report such cases to HCO.
YOU ONLY USE DIFFICULT CASE OR STUDENT IN THE ACADEMY AS AN
INDICATOR OF
SOMETHING WORSE. You aren't a staff auditor but an Instructor. You
want proper
auditor and case gain of course, and you'll get it (providing when
some student
says IT didn't work you find out exactly what the student did that
didn't work
and you'll find it was never what was ordered).
However, on cases that are very difficult, watch it! These
difficult cases
are more than cases. They mean trouble for you from that student and
for your
class in ways you wouldn't look for. By concentrating on "tough cases"
you miss
the fact that you have a whole Class to handle. If you want it
handled, look
rather at what these tough cases do to your class and handle the
"tough case" in
a way to protect your course, not to make their cases move.
IN AN ACADEMY, DON'T TRY TO HANDLE YOUR COURSE ENVIRONMENT WITH
STUDENT
AUDITING!
Handle your course environment with good data, good 8C and
discipline and
HCO Justice machinery.
Your students now have their old course regulations suspended.
Instead,
the Justice Codes are in. The students are Scientologists. Becoming
students
gives them no new rights. And it doesn't remove their Justice rights
either.
I've been through all you go through and I have found, by
comparing
conduct on a course to conduct in the field afterwards, that the
turbulent
student is a pc, not a student. He or she makes trouble. On the course
and
afterwards.
The total symptom that alerts you to such a person is "tough
case".
This is very easy to notice. Just look over the student case
folders and
note that one or another student doesn't seem to get going. Note the
folder you
have to work on. That's it. That's your trouble spot on the course.
DON'T judge
students by "conduct" or speed of study. Judge on "tough case" only.
Routine auditing is good unless it's been alter-ised. Routine
processes
work on good people.
The no-case-gain case makes you hunt for magical processes and
fatally
leads to alter-is. Now hear this:
61
THE PROCESSES YOU HAVE, EVEN WHEN ONLY FAIR, ARE BETTER THAN THE
PROCESSES
THAT WILL BE DREAMED UP BY STUDENTS OR ANYONE AROUND YOUR COURSE.
The processes you use, if altered to "fit" some tough case will
cease to
work on standard cases when so altered.
The "tough case" (who is also the difficult student) is the sole
reason
one has an urge to alter a process.
You must be sure to push routine processes done routinely. When
you see a
process being altered look for a "tough case" in the pc or the student
and call
HCO promptly if you find the poor TA type case, the "no change"
response to
routine processes.
Your approach is to run the standard processes in the right
grade in the
right sequence. That's all you teach students to do and it's all you
do in case
supervision.
When these "don't work" even when you force them to be correctly
applied,
you have a tough case there. Don't louse up Scientology technology to
handle a
"tough case". You don't have to invent the processes for it. They
already exist
in the HGC. When you see alter-is, look for the tough case and let HCO
take it
from there. We are, after all a team, and as a team we can handle our
environment.
Your job is just teach and get run the processes of the grade in
the right
sequence. Your job is to teach students to do just that. Your job is
to force
the student to run the process that should be run and run it right and
to
correct any alter-is savagely.
Never let some student tell you "it didn't work" without at once
plowing
in there to look. You will find only one of two things wrong:
1. Your student erred in the wording, sequence or application of
the process
through lack of study or
2. Either the student auditor or the student pc is a "tough case".
Don't let anybody try to vary a process to fit a case. If you do
your
indicator is obscured in letting anybody fool about it "trying to make
a process
work" or trying to get inventive just to crack a "tough case".
The majority of your course trouble and the tendency to alter-is
material
comes from trying to force a "tough case" to get gains. Should you
alter or
advise alteration of a process you are letting our side down. It leads
you into
teaching students to alter-is and there goes the balloon. It means
they won't be
able to run standard stuff successfully. And that means (let's be
brutal) they
will miss, by non-standard auditing, on 90% of their cases, the good
people.
They will slant all Scientology toward one nut and we'll be a failed
mess like
psychiatry with our clinics full of psychiatric cases not people.
The HGC (and perhaps one course level) is taught to handle
"tough cases".
The processes for them are standard, too. You must hold the line and
answer a
student's "didn't work" with "Exactly what didn't work?" and "Exactly
what did
you do?" and you'll find they didn't do it, or it's a tough case.
Either way
follow policy.
YOU MUST REPORT A TOUGH CASE TO HCO AT ONCE.
For there sits a Justice matter, not an Academy problem. It's
not your
hat.
You see the no-gain-case, the "withholdy case that ARC Breaks
easily",
"the blowy student", "unstable gain student" and your tendency may be
to do
something original or give the student some different process. If you
do you are
madly off-policy. In the ordinary Academy Course you are not teaching
a "tough
case" course. You are teaching a nice fast, workable course for decent
average
cases. Your majority is com posed of good students. They deserve your
time.
So this makes the "tough case" student the odd man (or woman)
out. They
make a lot of commotion so one may think they are "everybody" on a
course.
They're not. They are seldom higher than 10%. So you risk the 90% of
your
course and all Scientology just to handle 10%.
62
Could I point out that the Protestant idea of recovering at any
expense
and considering very valuable any sheep who strayed, was batty. How
about the
whole flock? Leave them to the wolves while one ran off after one? No,
please
don't go the route by doing that. It's pretty awful.
No, this "tough case" is for the HGC and HCO. And I'd darn well
rather you
didn't give the person the technology before he straightens out as
he'll hurt
people with it.
Such "tough cases" are possible to salvage. They're just cases.
But it
takes an HGC to run them and it takes HCO to hold them still so
they'll be
audited. Remember, we're a team. HCO and HGC are part of the team.
Don't steal
their hats.
The "tough case" is judged only of the basis of case gain or
lack of it.
The Academy does NOT send students to the HGC for "slow study"
or dullness
or any other reason except "tough case". That's firm policy. The
"tough case" is
the only one you send.
There are 3 categories of these "tough cases".
1. The Roller Coaster Case.
The Potential Trouble Source. A suppressive person is on the
other side of
this one. The case will get a gain and slump, get a gain and slump
over and
over. It isn't a "manic-depressive" as the old 19th Century psycho-
analyst
thought. It's a guy whose marital partner or family is going into fits
over this
person's connection with Scientology. This is purely a Justice matter
and
belongs to UCO. He either disconnects or acts. to settle his or her
situation.
No halfway measures. But you can't do much about that in an Academy.
If you did
you'd leave your class to the wolves. Get on-line and route this
mysterious
fellow who can't get a gain without losing it the next day or week
over to HCO
with a "Please investigate. Possible Potential Trouble Source." Don't
even
bother to question the student. HCO will find out. It's also illegal
to audit
them so HCO won't even route to the HGC but will act as per policy on
such.
Always err on the side of sending HCO too many students rather
than risk
keeping one who is a liability to us all. But never send merely a
course "cut-
up" or a lazy student whose case runs well. This policy is only
faintly
discipline. It is actually excellent technology to a recurring course
problem.
2. The Withholdy Case.
The withholdy case is routinely ARC Breaking and having to be
patched up,
commonly blows, has to have lots of hand-holding. As your course
possibly isn't
at that level it is too much to handle anyway and you're not equipped
to handle.
But even if your course is equipped to handle the right action is
again HCO.
Report this student to HCO with the label "Withholdy case that ARC
Breaks
easily" or "Blow type ease". And get HCO over to the Academy. HCO may
route to
HGC at the student's own expense or get two tough staff members to
stand by
while the withholds are explored on a meter in case this is a real
Justice case
or just a student lunch thief. The reason for all that weird behaviour
is always
a withhold condition. You can't be bothered. HCO, however, is
interested in the
NO REPORT aspect of such a case. This person hasn't told all that's
sure. HCO
can send to HGC or refund or even Comm Ev.
3. The Suppressive Person.
The suppressive person does turn up to get trained. And when you
train
them (a) their case doesn't change, (b) they cheer when their course
pc loses
and gloom when their course pc wins and (c) they chatter about the
horrors of
discipline and seek to lead student squirreling or revolt. Their dream
is a
society wherein the criminal may do anything he pleases without any
faintest
restraint. We sometimes get loaded up with these characters but they
run about
1 or 2 in 80 students usually. This person has no faintest chance of'
making it
unless handled for what he or she is in an HGC. And if you train such
you lend
our name to all the chicanery and injury they do with our tech and
protect them
with our name. You've seen this case in another guise of squirreling-
chatter-
chatter about phoney past lives when they were Cleopatra and so on
invalidating
others' actual memories, talking only whole track to raw meat. You've
seen this
one. It's suppression pure and simple and they know it! And they don't
ever get
a case change and their ARC Breaks don't heal, etc. etc. etc! The
secret here is
63
CONTINUOUS OVERTS which are then withheld. The technical fact is they
are quite
gone and are SOLVING A PERSONAL BUT LONG GONE PROBLEM BY CONTINUOUS
OVERTS. One
can actually handle them if one knows this seemingly tiny fact. One
finds of
course the PTP, not the overts. For one has about as much chance
pulling this
fellow's overts as moving the Earth by pulling weeds. The suppressive
acts this
person does are solutions to solve some long long ago problem in which
the pc is
stuck. To an HGC this is finding conditions of environment the pc has
had and
discovering how he or she handled them. But this is HCO-HGC business.
The longer
you wait to notify HCO, the more harm will be done and HCO will get
inquisitive
as to why there was no report from you on this. For here is the
auditor heart
breaker, the flatterer, the rumour factory, the 1.1 and the course and
group
wrecker. Here's "Whee, kill everybody!" in person. Here also is the
possible
government agent, the AMA BMA stooge. Here is the guy who plans to
"squirrel"
and "grab Scientology". Here is the boy. Or here is the girl. But here
is also a
thetan buried in the mud. And if you let this person go without
attention he or
she will soon become ill or die-or worse will mess up or kill others.
This
person is the only real psycho. And if you let him drift he'll soon
wind up in
the brain surgeon's suppressive hands. So it's nothing to overlook.
People who
have to solve their problems by shooting the rest of us down are what
made life
such a hell in this Universe. You have your hands on the implanter,
the
warmonger, the wrecker. But still, this is what's left of a human
being and he
or she can be salvaged. But only in an HGC, not a course. Please! Here
also is
the criminal or the sex crazy guy or the pervert who just had to break
old Rule
25 (the old no-sex Academy rule). People who are sex crazy are over
their heads
in a collapsed bank that they've collapsed themselves with overts.
Let's be
real. This person throws people back in twice as fast as we can pull
them out!
So why arm him with tech. Put on your label when you send for HCO "No-
Case-
Change despite good tries with the routine processes taught on this
course that
was closely supervised in correct application". Let HCO take it from
there. It's
not Academy business.
Your routine procedure on any of the 3 types of case is:
1. Call HCO Department of Inspection and Reports;
2. Minimize disturbance;
3. Hold the student in an empty classroom or auditing room;
4. Stand by to help if things get rough;
5. Help HCO complete its report;
6. Let HCO (and probably HGC) take over from there and get back to
your
students.
If you're going to grow and get your own case changes and have a
good time
instructing you'll read this very, very carefully and put it very
briskly into
practice.
At first you may not agree that you should be so sharp. It may
be a blow
to feeling you can crack all cases. You probably can. But man, that's
an HGC
hat. What are you doing wearing it as an Instructor? By all means
crack the
routine cases. But the tough Ones? That's HCO and HGC.
The bigger we get, the easier all this will be.
But now let's make a start in teaching courses that are fun for
all by
giving the deep six to those who want a mess.
Okay?
Well, do it, do it, do it.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
64
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 APRIL 1965
Remimeo ETHICS
All Tech Div HATS TRAINING AND PROCESSING
Preclears REGULATIONS
Al Qual Div HATS TECH DIVISION, QUAL DIVISION
TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
STUDENTS' QUESTIONS
(effective on the Posting of the 1965 Org Board)
1. The only answers permitted to a student's demand for verbal
technical
data or unusual solutions are
"The material is in (HCOB, Pol Letter or tape)."
"What does your material state?"
"What word did you miss in the (Bulletin, Pol Ltr or tape)?"
and (for requests for unusual auditing solutions)
"What did you actually do?"
Any other answer by Technical Secretaries, Ds of T, Instructors
or course
personnel is a misdemeanour.
2. Any instructor teaching or advising any method not contained in
HCOBs or
on tapes, or slighting existing HCOBs, Policy Letters or tapes
may be
charged with a crime.
3. Any Instructor in any way obscuring the source of technology by
wrongly
attributing it may be found guilty of a false report.
STAFF AUDITORS' ACTIONS
4. Any staff auditor who runs any process on any org pc that is not
given in
grade and level HCOBs may be charged by the Tech Sec or D of P
with a
misdemeanour.
5. Any alteration or non-standard rendition of a process is a
misdemeanour.
6. Any staff auditor running a pc above the pc's grade instead of
for the
next grade, or running processes out of sequence in a grade may
be charged
with a misdemeanour.
7. Any staff auditor reporting falsely verbally or in writing, on
an
auditor's report may be charged with a crime.
8. Any staff auditor turning in an illegible report may be charged
with a
no report which is a misdemeanour.
9. Any staff auditor attesting falsely to TA or falsely reporting
the
flattening of a process may be charged with a misdemeanour.
10. Any staff auditor who receives orders to run an illegal process
must
report the matter at once to HCO Ethics or Saint Hill,
requesting that
the person so advising be charged with endangering the staff
auditor's
job and repute.
STUDENT REGULATIONS
11. Former regulations for students are abolished.
12. Students are covered as Scientologists by the HCO Ethics Codes
and may
request recourse from injustice and have the same privileges as
any
field Scientologist.
13. Tech Secs, Ds of T, Supervisors and Instructors as well as
Qualifications
Division
65
personnel may request a Court of Ethics from the Department of
Inspection
and Reports for any student they find it necessary to discipline
under the
HCO Ethics Codes such discipline being in lieu of a Committee of
Evidence.
However the student may request a Committee of Evidence instead
if he or
she feels a wrong is being done.
14. Any student knowingly altering technology, applying processes
improperly
or using technology illegally on HGC pcs, on lower unit students
or the
public while a student may be charged with a misdemeanour.
15. A student damaging another by wilful application of incorrect
technology
may be charged by his Instructors with a Crime and a Court of
Ethics
action must be requested by his Instructors.
16. A student falsely enrolling may be charged by the org with a
crime.
17. Blowing a course is handled under Suppressive Acts. If so
charged the
student may have recourse if applied for before 60 days to the
Department
of Inspection and Reports Ethics Section.
PRECLEAR REGULATIONS
18. Preclears are covered by HCO Ethics Codes.
19. A preclear may have recourse when feeling unjustly wronged by
applying
to the Ethics Section of the Department of Inspection and
Reports of the
org.
20. A preclear refusing to answer an auditing question may be
charged by the
staff auditor with a "no report" and taken before a Court of
Ethics at
once.
21. An HGC or staff preclear must report flagrant breaches of the
Auditor's
Code to the Ethics Section of the Org, but if the report is
false beyond
reasonable doubt the preclear may be charged with a Suppressive
Act.
22. A student preclear or HGC preclear blowing an org without
reporting to the
Tech Sec, D of P or the Ethics Section first and who will not
permit any
auditor to handle the matter at the org where the auditing
occurred must
be fully investigated at any cost by HCO in the pc's own area.
The
auditing session must be fully investigated by the Ethics
Section and if
any Auditor's Code breaks are found to have occurred in that
auditing the
auditor may be brought before a Court of Ethics. The entire
matter and its
final results must be reported to the Office of LRH at Saint
Hill.
23. Charges against HGC or student preclears may also be made by the
Tech Sec,
the Qualifications Sec, Ds of T, Ds of P, Instructors and staff
auditors.
QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION
24. Any person undergoing Review is subject to the same actions as
in the HGC
or Academy and any personnel of the Qualifications Division may
charge
students and pcs under the Ethics Codes and bring them before a
Court of
Ethics.
25. Persons charged by Qualifications Division personnel may request
recourse
if wronged.
26. The Qualifications Division may request a Court of Ethics on
Technical
Division personnel, preclears and students for false reports,
false
attestations and no reports as well as other Ethics matters. And
the
Technical Division personnel may on their part request a Court
of Ethics
on Qualifications Division personnel, students or preclears.
This policy letter does not change any HCO Codes of Ethics but
only
augments them for the purposes of assisting peaceful and effective
training
and processing with the exact technology issued.
LRH:wmc.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright $ 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard [ Amended by HCO P/L 27 October 1970,
Issue II,
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Course Supervisor, in the 1970
Year Book.]
66
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 APRIL 1965
Issue II
Remimeo
TECH & QUAL DIVISIONS
TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
The first call on all Certified Auditors belongs to the
Technical and
Qualifications Divisions.
Certified Auditors are primarily assigned to these Divisions and
are then
additionally assigned to other posts.
At times of Technical and Qualifications overload, certified
auditors may
be called upon to take up their technical duties no matter what other
Division
they may be in; exempting only Executive Secretaries, Secretaries and
Directors
of Departments who have the staff status number of their post.
SKILL
The relative technical skill required of technical personnel is
as
follows:
1. Review Case Cracking Unit
2. Review Cramming Unit
3. Academy
4. HGC
5. Qualifications Division personnel
6. Technical Division personnel.
The Director of Processing should, in choosing between two
personnel,
be the better auditor than the Director of Training, but both should
be of high
skill.
A Qualifications Secretary must, to be other than a Deputy, have
higher
certificates, grades and status than other personnel in the
Qualifications
Division and must have been trained as a Review Case cracking auditor
in the
Saint Hill Department. of Review.
The Technical Secretary must have certificates, grades and staff
status
number senior to or equal to any auditor in the Technical Division and
must, to
have other than Deputy status, have been interned in the Saint Hill
HGC.
INTER-DIVISION
Inside any Division (but not from one Division to another)
Technical
personnel may be shifted without it being called a transfer from one
department
to another or one unit or section to another within the Division. This
is true
of all Divisions.
In Technical and Qualifications Divisions such shifts of post
are often
valuable in affording a change and gaining experience and
understanding.
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
67
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 APRIL 1965
Issue III
[Excerpt]
Remimeo
ETHICS
REVIEW
(Correction to HCO Pol Ltr 24 April 1965
and additional Ethics data)
As per HCO P01 Ltr of 28 April 1965, and others of later date,
orders to
auditing or training may not be made as a sentence or used in an
Ethics Court
or by a Comm Ev or any other reason. Auditing and training are awards.
A student who is disruptive of discipline and acts contrary to
the Ethics
Codes may not be ordered to Review by the D of P, D of T or Ethics
personnel or
other persons in an org.
ORDERING STUDENTS & PCs
Tech and Qualifications personnel, particularly the Tech Sec and
Qual Sec
and D of Estimations, the D of P and D of T, D of Exams and D of
Review and D of
Certs may order students or pcs to Review or to course or to HGC or
anywhere in
and around these two Divisions without any Ethics action being
implied. It is
just normal, done to get students and pcs on the road to higher
levels.
Ethics actions may only suspend training or deny auditing.
Therefore, a student ordered to Ethics for discipline who does
not then
give adequate promise and example of good behaviour and compliance
must be
thoroughly investigated even to his or her own area and in the
meanwhile may not
be trained or processed.
The student, however, may not be dismissed or expelled unless
full Ethics
actions and procedures have been undertaken.
All sentences carrying a denial of training or processing must
carry a
means of the right to be trained or processed being restored in a
specified time
or under specified conditions.
STUDENTS AND PCs & ETHICS
The routine action of Ethics is to request a reappraisal of
behaviour and
a signed promise of good behaviour for a specified time. If the
student or pc
refuses to so promise, then the next action of Ethics is an
investigation of the
student's course or pc's processing behaviour. When then confronted
with the
data, if the student still refuses to promise, Ethics undertakes a
full
investigation in the student's or pc's own area. If the student or pc
still
refuses to co-operate, the student goes before a Court of Ethics which
may pass
sentence.
RECOURSE
Only after sentence has been passed by a legal body such as a
Court of
Ethics or Committee of Evidence or after an illegal disciplinary
action may a
student or pc ask for a recourse.
Normally before asking for recourse a student or pc petitions
the Office
of L. Ron Hubbard if unwilling to accept the discipline but this must
be done at
once.
If the petition is unfavourably acted upon, the student or pc
may ask for
recourse.
Recourse must be requested of the Convening Authority that had
local
jurisdiction over the student or pc and may not be requested of higher
authority. A request to higher authority than the Ethics activity that
passed
sentence is a petition, not recourse.
LRH:jw.cden.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: A complete copy of this Policy Letter can be
found in
Volume 1, pages
395--398.}
68
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965
Tech Div Hats
Qual Div Hats TECH DIVISION
Etbics Hats QUAL DIVISION
Executive Hats ETHICS CHITS
This is a VERY important policy. When it is neglected the org
will
soon experience a technical dropped statistic and lose income and
personnel.
The most attacked area of an org is its Tech and Qual personnel
as
these produce the effective results which make Scientology seem deadly
to
Suppressives.
The Suppressive is TERRIFIED of anyone getting better or more
powerful
as he is dramatizing some long gone (but to him it is right now)
combat or
vengeance. He or she confuses the old enemies with anyone about and
looks on
anyone who tries to help as an insidious villain who will strengthen
these
"enemies".
Thus Tech and Qual personnel are peculiarly liable to covert,
off line,
off policy annoyances which in time turn them into PTSs. Their cases
will Roller
Coaster and they begin to go off line, off policy and off origin (see
Dev-T Pol
Ltrs) themselves.
This results in a technical breakdown and an apparency of
busyness in
these divisions which does not in fact produce anything, being Dev-T.
The policy then is: NO TECH OR QUAL PERSONNEL MAY OMIT GIVING
ETHICS CHITS
TO ETHICS ON ANY INCIDENT OR ACTION COVERED IN THE DEV-T POLICY
LETTERS OR WHICH
INDICATES SP OR PTS ACTIVITY.
This means they may not "be decent about it" or "reasonable" and
so
refrain.
This means they must know their Ethics and Dev-T Pol Ltrs.
This means they may not themselves act like Ethics Officers or
steal the
Ethics hat.
It means that they must chit students who bring a body and ask
for unusual
solutions; they must chit all discourteous conduct; they must chit all
Roller
Coaster cases; they must chit all Suppressive actions observed; they
must chit
snide comments; they must chit alter-is and entheta; they must chit
derogatory
remarks; they must chit all Dev-T. Anything in violation of Ethics or
Dev-T Pol
Ltrs must be reported.
Ethics will find then that only two or three people in those
areas are
causing all the upset. This fact routinely stuns Tech and Qual
personnel when it
is called to their attention-that only two or three are making their
lives
miserable.
Ethics, seeing tech statistics drop, must investigate all this
and WHEN
ETHICS FINDS the Qual and Tech personnel have not been handing in
Ethics chits,
the Ethics Officer must report them to the HCO Exec Sec for
disciplinary action.
NON ENTURBULATION ORDER
What to do with the 2 or 3 students or pcs causing trouble?
Ethics issues a Non Enturbulation Order. This states that those
named in
it (the SPs and PTSs who are students or preclears) are forbidden to
enturbulate
others and if one more report is received of their enturbulating
anyone, an SP
order will be issued forthwith.
This will hold them in line until tech can be gotten in on them
and takes
them off the back of Tech and Qua! personnel.
NOT THEORETICAL
This is not a theoretical situation or policy. It is issued
directly after
seeing tech results go down, Tech and Qual cases Roller Coaster and
results
drop.
Ethics found that the entire situation came about through no
chits from
Tech and Qual personnel about troublesome people which resulted in no
restraint
and a collapse of Divisions 4 and 5 Comm lines and results.
When Tech and Qua! personnel try to take the law into their own
hands, or
ignore issuing Ethics chits, chaos results, not case gains.
Keep Tech Results UP.
LRH:mh.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
69
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OP 5 JULY 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
ASSIGNMENT OF TECH PERSONNEL
The Director of Review has first, immediate and urgent call on
all
auditors not on duty due to the reason of their pcs being in Review.
Any
waiting list has first call on auditors whose pcs have just been
completed.
If there is no waiting list, such auditors are also on call to
Review.
If there is no call by the Director of Review, first call on the
auditors
is by the Director of Tech Service (Dept 10).
If the Director of Tech Service has no use for them, the third
priority
on idle auditors is Dir Comm for Expediters.
COURSE SUPERVISORS
First call on Course Supervisors who have no students or whose
classes
have been combined so as to leave them with no students is the D of P.
Second
call is Academy Admin and third call is Dir Comm and nothing may
interrupt any
of these priorities.
LRH:rnh.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 JULY 1965
Amends and cancels HCO Policy Letter
of 5 July 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
ASSIGNMENT OF TECH PERSONNEL
QUAL DIV
Auditors are fully assigned by name to the Qual Div. The
practice of
borrowing auditors from the Tech Div confuses the lines.
Assign enough auditors to Review to take care of the work. If it
is too
consistently an overload, assign additional auditors, but on a
permanent org
board basis, not a daily borrowing.
TECH DIV
First call on the auditors of the HGC who are not working is the
Dir of
Tech Service (Dept 10).
If the Director of Tech Service has no use for them, the second
priority
on idle auditors is Dir Comm for Expediters.
COURSE SUPERVISORS
First call on Course Supervisors who have no students or whose
classes
have been combined so as to leave them with no students is the D of P.
Second
call is Academy Admin and third call is Dir Comm and nothing may
interrupt any
of these priorities.
LRH:ml.cden.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
70
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 JULY 1965
Remimeo
All Tech Hats Tech Div
All Qual Hats Qual Div
RELEASES, POLICY ON
Every HGC auditor and executive and every person in the Qua!
Division
must be checked out on the following materials rapidly as soon as put
on staff.
The final result of lower level auditing is Release.
If an auditor cannot detect it and if executives do not know
what to do
with it, FANTASTIC ERRORS WILL OCCUR THAT WILL ARC BREAK PCS WITH THE
ORG.
This is the major area of technical goofs-messing up Releases.
If an auditor does not recognize floating needles and TA
position even
at Level 0, he or she will miss the point where the pc goes Release
and will
continue to audit the PC.
CLEAR PHENOMENA ON THE METER
Books
1. E-Meter Essentials, pages 17 and 18, paragraphs 40,
41,42,43,44,45,46
and 47.
HCO Policy Letters
1. Meter Checks-2 April 1965, paragraph entitled "Release Check".
SEC EDs
1. SEC ED 65 INT, 29 June 1965, Org Boom in Releases.
HCO Executive Letters
1. Data on Releases, 6 July 1965, page 2, number 7.
2. Former Release Programme, 5 July 1965, page 2, paragraph 2.
The Auditor
1. The Auditor, 8, page 3, column 1, paragraph 5.
HCO Bulletins
1. Model Session Revised, 3 July 1965, "Release Reached", paragraph
2.
RELEASES, VITAL DATA
HCO Policy Letters
1. Power Processes 28 April 1965
2. Release Award 4 May 1965
3. Releases, Vital Data 10 May 1965
4. Power Processes 20 May 1965
5. Memorandum of Agreement 21 May 1965
6. 6 Power Processes 14 June 1965
7. Releases 6 July 1965
8. Release Policies 12 July 1965
71
SEC EDs
1. 47 INT
2. 50 TNT
3. 51 TNT
4. 58 INT
5. 59 INT
6. 64 INT
7. 65 INT
HCO Executive Letters
1. The Future Programme 3 May 1965
2. Saint Hill Courses 23 May 1965
3. Data on BPC and Releases 10 June 1965
4. Snap and Pop 11 June 1965
5. More Data on Release 29 June 1965
6. Data on Releases 6 July 1965
Auditor 8
1. Article, "The Road to Clear".
Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart
1. Chart
2. HCO Policy Letter, Classification, Gradation and Awareness
Chart,
5 May 1965.
TECHNICAL MATERIALS OF RELEASE
HCO Bulletins
1. Clear and OT Behaviour 8 June 1965
2. Releases, Different Kinds 28 June 1965
3. Release Rehabilitation of Former Releases
and Thetan Exterior 30 June 1965
4. Model Session Revised 3 July 1965
5. States of Being Attained by Processing 12 July 1965
HCO Policy Letters
1. HGC PC Review Auditing Form 26 June 1965
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
72
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 JULY 1965
Gen Non Remimeo TECH DIV
& REGISTRAR
TESTING
All psychology type testing is herewith abandoned on HGC and
Academy
lines (not public lines).
This means the OCA, APA, IQ and tests of any other description.
The reasons are as follows:
1. Testing makes registration lines hard to manage.
2. Tests test only what a person knew and do not test an
increase of
awareness. They changed because of valence changes. Releasing has
shown they
do not test increased capacity to learn or live or the pc's new
potential but
Only test the pc's data awareness, all of which comes from the pc's
past. A
person knows only what he knew. Releasing and Clearing give back the
ability to
observe, know and act. Any data returned to the pc was data he knew
before arid
was occluded. But this doesn't show up on psychology type tests.
3. Different tests would be required to demonstrate what
increase the
pc has had. The old type test, measuring valence shifts, invalidate a
pc's
gains. He feels good, is alert and aware. The test only tests what he
knew.
Therefore until new tests are developed that do show the current state
of the
pc, the old type tests will not be used. Example - A Released OT can
tell you a
great deal of newly observed data but, tested on psychology tests can
only say
what he knew about life and cannot tell you what he now knows because
he is just
now knowing it. Not having seen a baby since going Released UT, he can
only
answer how he knew he reacted to babies. How he reacts now to babies
is unknown
to him since there are no babies around to react to.
4. The tests can be thrown by certain processes almost any
way you wish
in very short times. IQ can be raised giddily by rehabilitating the
ability to
withhold (DC HGC used this during an ACC with phenomenal results in IQ
gain).
You can shift valences on a pc almost at will with "Where would
be safe?"
and other processes. But when you clean up the pe himself you have
what he knew
or how he reacted and this is not yet known at the time tests are
given after
processing. Pes are more apt to know what they don't know in an
increased
awareness, coming off the manic of pretended knowing or false data.
5. Modern processing by grades is not clued by any test we
use. We once
had to have tests to tell us what to run. We now have advanced too far
to need
the data.
ALLOWED USE OF TESTS
Tests may be used as a Public Service, on Introductory Evening
Lectures,
by Field Staff Members or in any way as a purely promotional item to
give people
a reality on their cases to invite auditing.
Once they have bought training or processing the tests have no further
value.
PRESERVATION OF TESTS
All test files in an org must be carefully preserved. They are a
gold mine
of Research and Promotional material and are extremely valuable,
NO TESTS TO SAINT HILL
No further copies of pc tests or graphs need be sent to Saint
Hill.
Auditor-Pc attestation forms (LRH Daily Report) and Certs and
Awards
copies are sent instead as described in Policy Letters.
LRH:mh.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
73
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JULY 1965
Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
Tech Div
Qual Div
RELEASE DECLARATION RESTRICTIONS
HEALING AMENDMENTS
The following three policies emerged from a Comm Ev conducted at
Saint
Hill 23 July 1965.
RELEASE RESTRICTED
No person who is dependent for his or her livelihood upon a
Suppressive
Person or Group, may be awarded any Release award declaration or pin
as such a
person is not re!eased in his environment.
No person who is dependent for his or her livelihood upon
compensation
being paid for physical or mental disability, may be awarded any
Release award
declaration or pin as there is too much vested interest in remaining
disabled.
HEALING AMENDED
All students of any course are debarred from visiting any
medical or
healing practitioner unless they are given an Ethics clearance first
and all
possibility of "roller-coaster" (sudden case decline) has been looked
into and
any suppressives or bad auditing precisely isolated. The exception is
an
emergency involving severe injury or infectious disease, but in this
case the
student must be cleared by Ethics to be permitted back on course or
even in the
org. This includes all accidents.
Course Supervisors are subject to Comm Ev in not so routing
students
requesting to see a doctor.
All students must have permission to see a medical doctor except
in cases
of severe emergency.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.bp.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
74
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 SEPTEMBER 1965
Issue IV
Gen Non Remimeo
SOME TECH DIV POLICIES
(Preserved policy from former Policy
Letters which have been cancelled)
LEGAL ASPECTS OF SIGN UPS
No persons may be admitted to an Academy or HGC who have not
signed
waivers (release forms) of the old type.
All such waivers must include a statement that the person is
there on
his or her own determinism and that the person has no record of being
committed
in an institution or has a criminal record for felony.
Persons with such commitments or records should be referred to a
field
auditor near their home and refused training or processing at the
organization.
Persons suspected of purely medical illness should be referred
to a doctor
for competent treatment if such a doctor or treatment exists.
Minors must have their parents or guardians sign the waiver and
any note
for time payments.
Known trouble sources as per recent HCO Policy Letter, all of
which
remains in force, should be required to straighten up their lives
before
enrolling or signing up for processing or should be forthrightly
refused.
Anyone objecting to an E-Meter check should be refused entrance.
Thus by keeping the legal aspects straight you will be able to
help the
many and not be messed up by a few. For a very few such people (21 to
be exact)
were the sole sources of grief in the 1950 boom.
To have a boom, you have to keep your nose clean legally or you
can be
stopped by the enturbulence generated, both in the org and the public.
Such
enturbulence is all that shortens your lines or overworks staff.
HUSBAND-WIFE TEAMS ENTERING ACADEMIES
Husband-Wife teams should not be forbidden. But in all cases
where husband
and wife are trained to co-audit each other they must mail their
auditors'
reports routinely to the D of P for which they will be charged a
nominal but
real fee for case supervision.
Professional auditors or co-auditors who use auditing in or out
of an
Academy to estrange husbands and wives are subject to a Court of
Ethics at their
nearest HCO on any 2nd Dynamic misconduct complaint from either party,
husband
or wife, and a penalty up to suspension of certificate may be
sentenced the
offender if proven guilty.
During training it is against policy to team husbands and wives
together
for practice drills even when they will be co-auditing after leaving
class.
Where possible husbands and wives should, however, be persuaded
to bring
another couple to be trained rather than co-audit and it should be
arranged that
the wife audits the other wife and the husband the other husband after
training.
In this case it is all right to team them in any pairing under
training for
drills.
SCHOLARSHIPS
No scholarships are now allowed.
COURSE FEES STANDARDIZED
Any course taught in a continental zone must conform to that
zone's course
fees, and it must be approved by Saint Hill and not altered.
OUTSIDE COURSES
As present day level courses require a full Tech Division plus a
full
Qualifications Division plus an Ethics Officer, no Academy courses may
be given
outside Academy premises.
75
PE COURSES (BS COURSE)
PE Courses will still be taught by field auditors and franchise
holders,
which is the BS Course. They result in a BEGINNING SCIENTOLOGIST
certificate.
STUDENTS
A course completion is a check sheet not a time period or a
classification.
It is now a crime to run a course without a check sheet or to
change a
check sheet on a student after it's issued. A different check sheet
can be
issued to the next student that enrolls on that very same course. But
once
issued, the same one is completed for a course completion of that
course and
the student gets his certificate for the Level when it is and can take
his exam
for class. There are 2 check sheets actually-Theory and Practical.
Both should
be complete before you let a student go to the next certificate.
COURSE TIMES
All courses in all orgs enroll any time of any day. No special
courses
for certain dates will be tolerated in any org. Magazines should say
"Enrolls
any time" after every course in every Academy Ad. If you don't you go
mad trying
to get pcs every week for ad money and wind up with a psychiatric ward
for an
HGC. The check sheet system used now at Saint Hill for levels fits
every course
nicely and requires no "every 4 weeks". Saint Hill enrolls all week
long!
Further, Supervisors in Scientology must not personally lecture
students on
technology. If you want a current check sheet for a level write your
comm-member
(HCO Pol Ltr of 13 March 1965) at Saint Hill.
"CLEARS"
Sell Release with confidence. Only squirrelling on levels and
rough ARC
Break handling can prevent it. The total rundown of processes is easy
to groove
in in an HGC and should be adhered to violently if you want to get
results and
releases. It's no myth now.
RELEASED STUDENTS
Students who are releases have to do all the required auditing
as an
auditor. And get it passed. Release is an honorary, not a technical
award. But
a truly floating needle release may not be further audited except for
Power
Processes. A student doesn't know more about Scientology just because
he's
released. He just learns faster. So the released student must do all
his
auditing on pcs, subjective and objective. If you don't have any raw
meat for
a student to do all his levels on, make the student scrounge his own
pcs off the
street or citydump. Remember, don't panic on release. It means the
student like
any other student must do all his required check sheets and go on up,
level by
level just like every other student.
PLEDGING CODES
Applications for certificate must be made by every student. This
should
give how they want their name on the certificate, address, and the
routing of
the student out of the org, CF routing and all that.
This application must also carry a pledge stating that the
applicant
subscribes to and promises to uphold the Auditor's Code, the Code of a
Scientologist and it must state he is informed of and will follow the
policies
relating to gradation and classification.
CITY OFFICE AND CENTRAL ORG COURSES
City Offices may teach BS, HAS and HQS Courses. Central Orgs
teach these
and may teach Level courses according to their status of org-these
courses being
HRS by Class 0 orgs, HTS by Class I orgs (plus the HRS), Class II orgs
teach
HRS, HTS and HCA, Class III orgs teach HRS, HTS, HCA and HPA. In 1968
Central
Orgs will also be given permission to teach HAA if they have attained
Class IV
status.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Modified by HCO P/b 12 October 1972 Issue I, Sign-Up Made Simple,
which was cancelled by HCO P/L 1 December 1972 Issue IX of the same title,
also modifying the above policy letter, in the 1972 Year Book.]
76
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1965
Issue II
Saint Hill
issue only
STUDENT AND PC REPORTS
The Saint Hill Technical Division regularly receives student and
pc
reports from its junior orgs. These should be checked over by Tech as
per
usual Pol and then sent to Central Files. Central Files DOES NOT file
them;
The Central Files Officer only checks them against CF to be sure we
have their
addresses. He then sends the preclear reports to the Dept of Success
which
files them by area. Both student reports and HGC reports are both so
filed.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 DECEMBER 1965
[Amended 16 January 1970]
Remimeo
E-METERS ALLOWED
The Listing E-Meter and Mark V are the only meters allowed for
use in
the Dept of Processing, Dept of Training, and the Qualifications
Division.
This was announced in Auditor 10 and now becomes policy.
Further, students in training must have their own E-Meter. This
policy
must be enforced if you expect to turn out auditors who can audit.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
77
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 FEBRUARY 1966
Gen Non-Remimeo Issue III
Applies to
Saint Hill HGC CURE
Info other orgs INTERNE TRAINING AND STAFF AUDITORS
(Results from Comm Ev 1 Feb 66 and my
studies of situation)
Interne and staff auditor and course supervisor training and the
training
of Tech Division executives and any and all staff training of whatever
kind is
transferred herewith to the Qualifications Division Department of
Review. (This
does not include staff members taking standard courses in the Tech Div
at
night.)
The severe drop in the Tech Division's HGC completion statistics
which
began on 17 Nov 65 and reached bottom 14 Dec 65 and which did not
properly
recover had only one large change connected with it: HGC Interne
training was
transferred from the Qual Division to the Tech Division.
Mending a statistic fall consists of locating the change that
preceded it
and undoing that change.
This has been done in this Policy Letter by returning Interne
training and
staff auditor training back to Qua!.
The Committee of Evidence of 1 Feb 66 revealed that the then
Director of
Processing did not believe it possible to alter or change a statistic,
that one
could only explain and justify one. It is possible also that the
feeling that
one could not change a case was forced on staff auditors at that time.
On this
possibility, anyone taking charge of interne and staff auditor
training should
stress the truth that an auditor can change cases and can change them
as fast as
his auditing is smooth and by-the-book. An auditor gets completions in
exact
ratio to the letter perfectness of his auditing and his adherence to
the exact
technology we now have in Scientology.
The Qual Sec need not necessarily change Interne Supervisors or
times of
training unless he sees fit. It is pointed out that he is held
responsible for
the quality of HGC auditor performance and technical knowledge and how
he
achieves this is up to him.
The Director of Processing is held responsible for the amount of
auditing
time put in on pcs. Should results not occur by reason of poor auditor
performance on the advice of the Case Supervisor he should order the
auditor to
Qua!. And if the results are not forthcoming by reason of non-
compliance with
the Case Supervisor's orders he should order the auditor to Ethics for
a
hearing.
If an auditor auditing in and for the HGC receives an order from
the D of
P or the Case Supervisor that is non-standard or is an extra-ordinary
solution
he must file a job endangerment Chit with Ethics at once and may not
execute the
instruction.
The principal duties of the D of p are to get auditors putting
in auditing
time and getting lots of pcs done and interview pcs to check flatness
or
unflatness of processes. Checking must be done with a minimum of
waiting time by
the auditor and pc. The D of P does not check out release grade
attainments as
this is done by the Qual Examiner and any double examination (by both
D of P and
Qual Examiner) must be held to a minimum.
The D of P also musters his auditors before the morning session
and before
the afternoon session and hands out folders at these times with a
minimum of
session time loss.
The Case Supervisor does the folders. The Case Supervisor does
not
interview cases but runs them by the book and folder. When a Case
Supervisor
interviews cases or discusses them with the D of P or auditor it has
been found
that only then do errors creep in and hold up progress. Therefore the
Case
Supervisor and D of P must not occupy the same office.
The Case Supervisor may not take technical orders from the D of
P. The
Case Supervisor is under the Tech Sec, not the D of P.
The D of P looks after staff auditors and Internes as Org
personnel and is
their immediate superior.
The D of P is responsible for staff auditor procurement without
absolving
HCO's personnel officer from it.
78
That auditors are on the job on time and are putting in their
session
time and their conduct and their actions as staff members are all m
the province
of the D of P.
The Qua! Div's Dir Rev may remove an auditor from the active
processing
list if he believes that auditor is not sufficiently trained but if so
must
either take action to further train or inform the Qua! Sec the auditor
may not
be permitted to audit, the Qual Sec informing the HCO Area Sec to
transfer the
person or dismiss. Before the D of P can assign an auditor to audit he
must have
an ok chit from Dir Rev.
The Leading Auditor idea may be preserved or discarded at the
discretion
of the D of P.
The D of P assigns auditors to specific cases. This is done by
Tech
Services in actual fact but only after consultation with or approval
of the D
of P.
The Case Supervisor may order a staff auditor to review for
clumsiness
or to Ethics for non-compliance but must do so through the D of P on
whose
actual authority it is done.
The daily summary of results by the HGC is compiled by the Case
Supervisor
and promptly posted on a public board. Auditors sent to Ethics or
Review and pcs
Sent to Ethics or Review are noted by name on this board.
TABLE OF RESPONSIBILITY
FOR HGC STAFF AUDITORS AND INTERNES
Org Exec Sec - Full responsibility for quantity and quality of
service.
Qual Sec - Training arrangements for all Tech Personnel
and
Internes. Satisfied pcs.
Dir Exams - Authority to Declare.
Dir Rev - OK to Audit chits, repair of goofs. Actual
training.
Satisfied pcs.
Dir Certs & Awards - Declares pc awards.
Chaplain - Port of refuge for pcs and auditors when all
else fails.
Tech Sec - Completion Statistic of the Tech Div, Executive
Personnel
appointments, general adherence to plan and
design.
D of P - Staff Auditors and Internes as Staff Members,
PC auditor
assignment, auditing quarters state of and
assignment,
Ethics and Review routing authority, auditor
procurement,
pc procurement, checkouts for flatness of
processes, head
of Dept.
Case Supervisor - All Case Folders, results on cases, indicating
auditors
and pcs to Review or Ethics or Declare, posting
results,
adherence to proper technology.
HCO Area Sec - Taking effective action on down graphs that
don't recover
at once.
Ethics Officer - All Ethics actions referred or found necessary.
Personnel Officer- Staff Auditor Procurement.
Dir Registration - New Internes.
I wish to point out that these were more or less the
arrangements which
existed prior to the slump in November, and which were in force when I
was Case
Supervisor.
I, as Exec Dir SH, hold the Org Exec Sec SH and through her the
Tech Sec
SH and Qual Sec SH responsible for seeing that these orders and
arrangements are
carried out exactly for only these will cure the HGC slump. And they
will cure
it only if exactly performed.
-----------
Note: This instance of a slumped statistic brings to view a
curious
phenomenon I noted while studying it. Apparently there is a natural
law that
"where interdependence does not exist, a slump may occur". This
applies to life,
but it apparently is vital to an org. Where a function of an org does
not have
lines across two or more portions of an org, the function may slump.
In this case the action of auditing and responsibility for
results as
earlier organized crossed Tech, Qua! and HCO, 3 divisions. When
Interne and
staff auditor training was dropped into Tech along with the auditing
also the
tension went out of the line and the statistic slumped.
79
If this law is so, then any function of an org that is not
dependent on 2
or more portions of the org may slump. And on checking up I have found
that only
those functions at Saint Hill which do not have lines into two or more
divisions
are already slumped.
Thus a possible principle of organization exists-that a line, to
function,
must cross divisions. A staff member, being a terminal must not cross
divisions.
But lines of functions must.
This is only a comment but is curious enough to be remarked.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 FEBRUARY 1966
Remimeo
Tech Div
Qual Div
STAFF AUDITOR AND SUPERVISOR PROCUREMENT
The Director of Processing is responsible for procuring
qualified staff
auditors, regardless of any action by Dept 1, Div 1.
This has always been the case and always will be.
The Director of Training is responsible for procuring Academy or
College
Supervisors regardless of any action by Dept 1 Div 1.
Neither of these policies absolves Dept 1 Div 1 from the
procurement of
staff Auditors and Supervisors.
QUAL DIV TRAINS STAFF
The Qualifications Division trains staff Auditors, Internes,
Supervisors,
Ds of T, Ds of P and Tech Secs.
No other division than Qualifications may train staff.
-----------
Note: A recent slump in Tech statistics at Saint Hill followed
at once in
a shift of training of Internes from Qual to Tech Divisions.
Note: A slump in HGC completions was traced to the Tech Sec and
D of P
taking no interest or action in procuring HGC Auditors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
80
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 FEBRUARY 1966
Remimeo Issue II
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
Ethics Hats TECH RECOVERY
My study of a Nov 1965 plummeting HGC Completion statistic
indicates
certain policies are necessary in all HGCs and Qua! Divisions.
The following errors were found:
1. The HGC ceased to look for former release grades to
rehabilitate and
ignored opportunities to do so on the basis that "outer orgs have
rehabbed them
all already". This came out in the Comm Ev held on a D of P of that
period. Of
course, if the HGC failed to rehab earlier grades (or earlier life
overruns) it
could achieve no later grades or Grade V. This alone would have ended
completions promptly on all grades and wiped out the graph.
2. Invalidation of the appearance of a free needle and
invalidating any
auditor who "thought he saw one". This wiped out all release
attainments and
made for total overrun of all pcs of all grades. This error existed
for 15 years
so it is not surprising that it got back in again.
3. Whenever an overrun occurred, "rehabilitation of it" was done
by
running different new processes instead of standard rehab routine as
in HCOBs,
i.e. Doing ARC Break, PTPs, Rudiments, anything but a real rehab of
that process
that was overrun.
4. Abandonment of standard tech in favour of unusual solutions.
This is
always present when a collapse of Tech occurs.
5. One SP was found in the middle of all this but after his
departure the
statistic did not recover so one can assume another SP was in the
middle of it
still or that the HGC remained PTS and didn't separate from the SP
found because
he was so convincing, so reasonable and so persuasive as to why a Tech
statistic
must remain down.
------------
It is interesting that (1) above-ceasing to rehab lower grades-
would be
absolutely fatal to any upper grades. Therefore this becomes policy:
NO UPPER GRADE OF RELEASE MAY BE BEGUN NEWLY ON A PC UNTIL ALL
LOWER
GRADES ARE FULLY REHABBED TO FREE NEEDLE. THIS APPLIES TO ALL GRADES 0
TO VII.
Regarding (2)-Invalidation of what a free needle is-and thus
running past
all free needles, let it be noted that this is an Auditor's Code Break-
continuing a process that has ceased to produce change and is
therefore a crime.
This was wrong too long to be allowed to go wrong again. Thus we get
the policy:
AN AUDITOR WHO HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE OVERRUN A FREE NEEDLE ON A
PRECLEAR
MUST BE GIVEN AN ETHICS CHIT; AND IF THE ACTION IS SEVERAL TIMES
REPEATED,
ETHICS MUST ORDER A FULL REVIEW OF THE AUDITOR'S CASE INCLUDING AN
EYESIGHT TEST
AND CONDUCT A THOROUGH ETHICS INVESTIGATION AND HEARING.
Note that a Mark V Meter run with too high a sensitivity does
not give a
marked change when a needle floats. Thus sensitivity must be reduced
in ordinary
running and increased only to get in rudiments. Then a free needle
becomes more
visible. A Mark V cranked up to 128 Sensitivity looks like a floating
needle all
the time at a casual glance on most pcs. Sensitivity 5 is ample.
Also, meters go out of 5,000 ohm calibration and don't read on
the M and F
"Clear" reads and change of electrodes can change M and F "Clear"
reads.
A free needle, if a process is overrun vanishes with just one
extra
command so an auditor must be alert.
Please also note that this has been part of the Auditor's Code
for ages-
running past a flat point of a process has been forbidden since the
first
formulations of the Auditor's Code.
81
Regarding (3)-Rehabilitation by using other processes-the HCOBs
on rehabs
are very explicit. To run another process would clobber the pc. Thus
we get the
policy:
REHABILITATIONS MUST BE DONE BY REHABILITATING THE PC ONLY ON
THE PROCESS
OVERRUN AND ONLY BY STANDARD HCOBS ON REHAB PROCEDURE.
Re (4)-Unusual solutions-we get the policy:
ANY AUDITOR ACCEPTING AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION WITHOUT FILING A JOB
ENDANGERMENT CHIT OR FOUND USING AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION MUST BE CHARGED
WITH A
CRIME AND GIVEN AN ETHICS HEARING. FAILING TO REPORT AN UNUSUAL
SOLUTION ADVISED
OR USED IS ALSO SO HANDLED. AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION IS ONE EVOLVED TO
REMEDY AN
ABUSE OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGY.
On (5)-Statistic failing to recover after an SP is spotted in a
department gives us the 2 policies:
WHENEVER AN SP IS DISCOVERED AND DECLARED IN AN ORGANIZATION ALL
HIS
ASSOCIATES IN THAT PORTION OF THE ORG MUST BE CHECKED OUT FOR OR GIVEN
AN S & D.
and
WHEN AN SP IS DISCOVERED IN AN ORGANIZATION, IS DISMISSED OR
REMOVED AND
THE STATISTIC DOES NOT RECOVER, ANOTHER SP MUST BE LOOKED FOR.
---------
It is noted that the general condition of the Completion
Statistic of Dec
65 to Jan 66 could be attributed to the above gross errors.
It is now certain that (1) Rehabilitation of earlier grades, (2)
Free
Needle and (3) Rehabilitation by standard practice are primary targets
in our
technology for anyone seeking to mess it up and that unwitting
tampering with
these three things and lack of HCO Enforcement on them will reduce HGC
statistics and prevent their recovery.
Of course one could also go mad in the opposite direction-( I)
rehabilitate earlier grades endlessly on a pc regardless of how many
times a
free needle had been obtained, (2) call any loosening up of a needle a
free
needle and (3) refuse to even 2-way comm with a pc under repair for
overrun for
fear it violates standard procedure for rehab.
The middle course is the correct course in this case. Relax and
just be
very sure the pc has been properly rehabbed to free needle on each
grade up to
the one one is going to start by demanding the awards of release that
were
granted and if these weren't ever awarded, then do the rehabs
necessary grade
by grade. The only sticky point in this is that if a pc had ever been
run on a
higher grade without rehab of a lower, one must rehab "from the top
down" at
times, tackling the highest overrun first, but nevertheless doing all
of them
that were by-passed eventually.
The way to recognize a free needle is watch for one. When it
happens you
will see one. Then you will never afterwards wonder. The free needles.
available
on a case can all be swallowed up by a failure to rehab all grades
ever by-
passed or overrun. If no free needles show up on a case at all then
partially
rehab any grade available for rehab back and forth until one has one
of them go
free needle and then get a free needle on the remainder. Life can also
be an
overrun and a pc never audited will respond to a rehab of "something
overdone".
This doesn't mean the pc went release before Scientology-it means that
purpose
overrun then jams-rehab of life situations of overrun consists of
hitting the
purpose that was overrun and when this is hit, the pc goes release in
PT and was
not a release in the past. An example is an overrun located in 20 AD
when the
person, alert to Christianity decided to be good, made it and then
overran it
for 1945 years. When the purpose was found (to be good) and dated and
the
overrun spotted the needle went free. Rough auditing, bad TRs,
"letting the pc
Itsa", etc can swallow up free needles. Also a totally ARC Broke meter
that
won't read at all with bad indicators all over the place won't record
a read,
looks sometimes like a floating needle, the difference being the pc
has total
bad indicators-sour, mean, sad, etc. A free needle occurs most often
after a big
cognition and the unskilled auditor looks at the pc who is being
bright and
interesting and just doesn't see the needle float, asks more questions
and
overruns, and the free needle vanishes-when a pc is cogniting, look at
the meter
not the pc. And the instant the TA starts up and the needle goes
sticky suspect
an overrun and check.
82
As for doing something else rather than Standard Procedure for
rehab,
plain ignorance can cause it. The auditor's desire to help the PC if
unaccompanied by solid tech background leads to wild efforts, new
processes
and anything but cool standard procedure..
When the person checking out pcs is also the case supervisor,
unusual
solutions creep in. The most errors I've seen made by a Case
Supervisor were
made after he had seen the pc or talked with the auditor. Cases have
to berun by
report only and auditors have to be supervised and their sessions
listened to by
somebody else besides the Case Supervisor. Tech is Tech. There is such
a thing
as Standard Tech. Pc wild tales and hollow eyes and auditor hobby
horses have-to
be kept off Case Supervisor lines. So there must be a person who
checks out pcs
and supervises auditors and their auditing performance but who never
opens his
or her face to suggest instructions about the PC and only writes down
that the
auditor is rough or the process is flat or the process is overrun. The
Case
Supervisor lives in an Ivory tower. Sounds strange but unless it's
done that
way, wild departures from Standard Rehab Procedure and from Standard
Tech in
general will occur. Hell, all psychiatry went down that drain-the
desperate
patient, the desperate measures. Squirrelling stems from the Case
Supervisor
being the auditor supervisor and the pc interviewer. Oil, water, being
in two
divisions, Commies and Fascists, dogs and cats won't mix. Neither will
the
personal contacter of auditors and pcs and the Case Supervisor ever
successfully
stay crossed. The individual practitioner breaks down only because he
does both
auditing and Case Supervision. Auditing is an organization action
which is why
today we have Field Staff Members and HGCs.
Additional notes of things discovered in the investigation of
the
plummeted statistic on Completions were:
1. Auditors rabbiting out of uncertainty and so stumbling past
End
Phenomena and floating needles.
2. Case Supervisor getting auditors to ask leading questions on
Pr
Pr 2-"Ask the pc if he is interested in Medical Practices".
3. D of P: "Find out what the needle is floating on".
4. Case Supervisor: Told auditor that a floating needle was not
the
End Phenomenon of a Process in which "the TA had to be run
out".
5. Lack of knowledge and understanding of the Technology and
not knowing
the difference between such things as Anaten, Secondaries
and Engrams
by Case Supervisor, D of P, and so confusing auditors.
-----------
Of course the one thing one can't technically overcome is an SP
keeping
an area messed up. His case doesn't improve because of his intentions
and overts
and fear of people getting better or being bigger than he. When an SP
dominates
an area, only Ethics actions can handle.
The primary indicator of the presence of an SP in an org is a
plummeting
statistic immediately after he starts handling a portion of it.
Indifferent leadership, even inaction can't drive a statistic
down. Only
active suppression can.
So watch the statistics and don't get reasonable when they fall.
Either
outside the org suppression has been brought down on that portion of
the org,
making it PTS or there is an SP there. The final answer is what
happened just
before the statistic fell. If a new appointment was made and it fell,
unappoint
it fast. If nothing cures the down statistic find the SP or handle the
PTS
situation because one or the other are there.
Completions stayed down for 15 years. Then we found auditors
never noticed
free needles. Now for Heaven's sakes, 15 years was enough. Don't
repeat the
error!
It does work you know.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
83
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 MARCH 1966
Remimeo
All Scn Staff
Tech & Qual
HGC CURE (Continued)
Long after I thought the final findings were all in in the Nov-
Dec 65 HGC
Completion Slump, another really gross HGC error showed up.
Training of HGC auditors was shifted from Qua! to Tech Div just.
before
the fantastic down curve. This change was known and caused a heavy
investigation
of the HGC.
But this datum was not disclosed until later:
STARRATED CHECK OUTS ON INTERNES AND AUDITORS DESPITE EXPLICIT
INSTRUCTIONS WERE DROPPED THE MOMENT THE TRANSFER FROM QUAL TO TECH
OCCURRED.
The newer auditors began to audit with no real data.
Thus we find the SP discovered in that investigation had
discovered a
thorough way to depress a statistic-you didn't require check outs on
processes.
This gives us another vital datum-
IF YOU DO NOT REQUIRE HGC AUDITORS AND INTERNES TO CHECK OUT STAR-
RATED ON THEIR
MATERIALS BEFORE THEY AUDIT HGC PCS THE COMPLETION STATISTIC WILL GO
TO ZERO. It
did at once,
I think lack of this one datum has been holding back all the
statistics in
any org that has not recovered.
Lack of star-rates on staff auditors and internes has been found
to crash
an HGC and deliver no service.
Remedy it at once on all staff auditors, internes and
supervisors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
84
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 MARCH 1966
Remimeo Issue II
All Tech &
Qual Hats
Students Tech & Qual
Solo Audit Course
Interne Course U R G B N T
Clearing Course
STAR RATES ON TECH AND QUAL STAFF
Effective on Receipt
ETHICS NOTE ALL ORGS - It is a High Crime not to have this
Policy
continually in effect after 1 June 66 as it has been found to
suppress
orgs when not kept in effect and to crash HGCs.
All HCO Bs and Tech Info and Advices of the following courses
are STAR
RATED and the student may not begin to audit until they have all been
passed
with Star-Rated type check outs with no comm lag.
INTERNE COURSE (Power Process and HGC Staff Auditors)
CLEARING COURSE (but not the platens)
All vital data required for auditing at Level VI must be checked
out,
Star-Rated on the following Course:
SOLO AUDIT COURSE
All HGC and Qual Auditors and Internes must pass in all
Scientology
Orgs star-rated all HCO Bs directly concerned with all the Level
Processes
they will use on pcs, Rehabs, S & D and various Review actions and the
Pol
Ltrs governing the HGC and Review and any relation to Ethics before
being
permitted to audit an HGC PC in any HGC anywhere or to audit in
Review.
Note: - The above data applies to all orgs when they teach the
listed
courses and applies to all HGCs at once.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
85
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MARCH 1966
Remimeo
Exec Secs Hats Exec - HCO -. Tech - Qual
ES Comm Qual Hat Ethics
HCO Sec Hat
Dir I & R Hat URGENT
Ethics Hat
Tech & Qual Hats HIGH CRIME
LRH Comm Hat
Effective 1 June 1966
In any instance of a heavily falling statistic in Tech or Qual
or
a chronically low statistic in Tech or Qual in an org or in any org
which
has chronically low statistics in all divisions:
The Ethics Officer must look for this policy violation which is
the
highest crime in Tech and Qual:
TOLERATING THE ABSENCE OF, OR NOT INSISTING UPON STAR-RATED
CHECK OUTS ON ALL PROCESSES AND THEIR IMMEDIATE TECHNOLOGY
AND ON RELEVANT POLICY LETTERS ON HGC INTERNES OR STAFF
AUDITORS IN THE TECH DIV OR STAFF AUDITORS OR INTERNES IN THE
QUAL DIV FOR THE LEVELS AND ACTIONS THEY WILL USE BEFORE
PERMITTING THEM TO AUDIT ORG PCS AND ON SUPERVISORS IN TECH AND
QUAL WHO INSTRUCT OR EXAMINE OR FAILING TO INSIST UPON THIS
POLICY OR PREVENTING THIS POLICY FROM GOING INTO EFFECT OR
MINIMIZING THE CHECK OUTS OR LISTS.
If an Ethics Officer or any person in HCO Dept 3 discovers this
high
crime to exist he must report it at once to the HCO Area Secretary.
The HCO Area Secretary must at once order a thorough
investigation
into any and all persons who might have instigated this high crime and
report
the matter to the HCO Exec Sec.
The HCO Exec Sec must then convene a Committee of Evidence with
the
persons accused as interested parties and must locate amongst them the
suppressive or suppressives by the "reasonableness" of their defence,
state
of case and other signs.
The Committee of Evidence must declare the located S.P.
suppressive by
HCO Ethics Order and dismiss.
If any Ethics Officer, Director of I & R or HCO Area Secretary
fails
to obtain Co-Operation by superiors in carrying out this Policy Letter
quickly
then he or she must inform the LRH Communicator.
The LRH Communicator must then cable full particulars to
Worldwide.
The Worldwide AdCouncil must then carry out this policy letter
expeditiously and at any cost.
If the HCO personnel making this discovery cannot obtain action
in any
other way he or she must go outside the org and cable LRH Comm WW and
his
actions and costs in so cabling will be reimbursed on Claim to WW and
his post
will be fully protected.
86
If the AdCouncil WW suspects this policy not to be in full force
in
any org despite assurances an HCO WW personnel must be sent to that
org to
investigate and may be deputized to remove either or both Exec Secs of
that
org by Comm Ev on the spot or at WW.
-----------
It has been discovered that failure to check out, Star Rated,
the Tech
and Qual HCO Bs applying to levels being audited or taught or examined
and
their processes and the data used in Review and relevant policy on
those using
the material in orgs results in a crashed Division 4 completion
statistic,
crashed income and low statistics throughout and a failing org and was
the
reason through 1965 for struggling orgs-the public would not pay more
for
service than it was worth to them and with this policy out, the
service was
not worth very much.
It has been found that a suppressive person will discourage this
check
out policy as one of his first actions.
-----------
This policy applies whether an auditor has been trained or not
with star-
rated check outs. Staff and Review auditor and Supervisor are special
technical
status grades and one cannot consider this double training.
-----------
"Star-Rated" means = 100 percent letter perfect in- knowing and
understanding, demonstrating and being able to repeat back the
material with
no Comm lag.
Org Exec Sec Communicator, for Qual WW is the final authority
for any
check sheets on this matter and is responsible for preparing and
standardizing
them from time to-time. But the lack of a check sheet from ES Comm
Qual WW does
not set aside any provision or penalty of this policy letter.
-----------
This policy letter is issued in the complete knowledge that the
absence
of this policy in full effect is the primary reason for orgs not
growing and is
based on actual experience.
-----------
The only higher crime I could think of would be to pretend to
have an
org but have no technical personnel on staff in Tech or Qual. That is
suppressive also and will crash an org. Handle it similarly to the
above.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Added to by HCO P/L 21 November 1971, Scientology Courses Examination
Policy,
Volume 5-page 139, which made it firm policy that anyone examining a
student for
certification on any Scientology Course, including Admin, must have
first star-
rated related Policies, HCO Bs or other issues before writing or
grading exams.]
(Note: In the original issue of this Policy Letter the words "THE
ABSENCE OF" in
the first line of the 3rd paragraph were omitted. However, in a poster
issued by
Flag in 1971 quoting this capitalized paragraph of the "High Crime"
P/L, these
words were included, and accordingly have been added in this printing.
- Ed.]
87
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 JULY 1966
Remimeo
TECH vs QUAL
The general rule is laid down that, except for Declaration of
Grade,
Certificate or Class, Tech shall attempt to handle all it can on all
cases
and students and only when Tech personnel consider it hopeless (or the
student
or pc is ready for Declare, Cert or Grade) shall the student or pc be
sent
to Qual.
"Review flat" is not now to be considered mandatory. The pc
previously
has been sent to the D of P and then to Qual to verify that a flat
point has
been reached. This routing is ended. If the auditor or Case
Supervisor, either
one, wants a check for the flatness of a process, only then is the pc
sent to
the D of P (not to Qual also). If the flatness indicates a grade has
been
attained the usual action is just send from auditor to examiner in
Qual.
To routinely and always send a pc for a flatness of process
check is
actually a violation of the Fast Flow Management System. It checks
things
which may be all right.
Review, when it finds a rehab incomplete, should quickly route
the pc
back to Tech. As a general rule, on]y when Tech is utterly at a loss
does
Review take over and audit the pc.
The Case Supervisor should keep and post HGC auditor
"statistics"
announcing goofs and wins. The Case Supervisor must require a retrain
of an
HGC auditor whenever a pc winds up being audited in Review. I always
send the
auditor to Interne Training for retrain whenever I have to send a pc
to Review.
Processing today is very simple but very exact. The data is all
there.
That's the only data. Don't add any. Just do what the HCOBs say. There
are no
exceptional cases.
HGC auditors who over-run just don't know what a free needle is.
They
should ask a Clear to hold the cans so they can see one.
When you check for flatness on a process gone to free needle you
may
overrun it. For the auditor, the D of P and the Examiner and Review to
check,
each one, for flatness, will goof up a flat point every time.
For the Case Supervisor to neglect ordering retraining of his
auditors
when he finds pcs not doing well is a grave omission.
For Tech not to carry on trying and limply turn all bits and
pieces
over to Qual is to train Tech into weakness.
Two rules:
In Tech, when all else fails, then hand it over to Review.
In any difficulty, when all else fails, do what Ron says.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
88
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 AUGUST 1967
Remimeo
BPI
SECOND DYNAMIC RULES
It has never been any part of my plans to regulate or attempt to
regulate
the private lives of individuals.
Whenever this has occurred it has not resulted in any improved
condition.
All I have been interested in, so far as Scientology law was
concerned,
was in removing retarding elements or practices from the path of
progress toward
freedom.
Man is aberrated. Otherwise we would not be here. He is hard to
rescue as
he has been carefully "trained" to do himself harm.
I have no concern about the second dynamic activities of
Scientologists
save only where they bring suffering to others and so impede our
forward
progress.
Therefore ALL FORMER RULES, REGULATIONS AND POLICIES RELATING TO
THE
SECOND DYNAMIC ACTIVITIES OF STUDENTS, PRECLEARS, STAFF AND
SCIENTOLOGISTS ARE
CANCELLED.
In their place, any husband, wife or individual whose processing
or
training has been impeded or interrupted beyond any reasonable doubt
by second
dynamic activities on the part of staff or associates or their husband
or wife
may have recourse to the CHAPLAIN'S COURT, Division 6, of any
Scientology
organization, and any case heard, if it be proven beyond reasonable
doubt that,
without provocation, a person's training or processing has been
impeded by the
irregular second dynamic actions of the defendant, a fine of not less
than �1000
sterling or greater than �5000 sterling shall be awarded the plaintiff
and until
paid, the defendant shall have no further training or processing.
This policy is not retroactive (Occurrences before this date may
not be
tried).
No Ethics order shall be issued by reason of second dynamic
activities.
All Ethics orders now in force relating to the second dynamic are
cancelled.
No staff member may be punished, transferred or dismissed
because of
second dynamic activities.
No student or preclear may be suspended or dismissed because of
second
dynamic activities.
Nothing in this policy letter lays aside our actual knowledge of
the
consequences of second dynamic overts against husbands and wives being
processed
or the degree to which training or processing can be impeded for
someone because
of another's acts.
We are also aware that those org staffs which are over active on
the
second dynamic seldom prosper.
We also retain any and all technology relating to the second
dynamic.
One of Man's primary areas of aberration is the second dynamic.
Processing, not discipline, is the only thing which eradicates
aberration
of such depth.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jp.cden Founder
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
89
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1967
Remimeo
All Tech & Qual Staff
Ethics
CONFIDENTIAL DATA
1. No Ethics Chit written by anyone should contain data which is
classified
as confidential.
2.. Such material so classified is contained in Power Processes,
Clearing
Course and Advanced Courses.
Qual Sec - Helen
Pollen
HCO Area Sec - Irene
Dunleavy
Exec Council SH - J.J.
Delance
- Joan
McNocher
- Ken
Urquhart
Exec Council WW - Tony
Dunleavy
- Eunice
Ford
- Ken
Delderfield
Guardian Comm WW - Corrie
Ellis
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:jp.cden The Guardian WW
Copyright ($) 1967 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 NOVEMBER 1967
Remimeo
Info Int E/O WW
Local B/Os
Info Int SPEOWW OUT TECH
ANY AND ALL published mimeoed out tech processes or "recommendations"
or
"interpretations" not written or signed by myself must be sent to the
International Ethics Officer at WW with any information on their
authorship
or origination so that Conditions may be assigned and broad
cancellation
can be issued by the International Ethics Officer.
The reason for this is the discovery of a process on page one of
the
Org Exec Course checksheet of 21 Sept 67 which would ruin any
student's case,
his interest in admin and which would deter enrolment.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
90
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MAY 1968
(Reissued from Flag Order 800)
Remimeo
SCIENTOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
There is one Tech and that is Standard Tech.
Unfortunately there is other Tech around. This other Tech is a
Liability.
Other Tech is defined as any tech which is not-standard Tech.
Let's start punching this hard.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:sb.js.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 AUGUST 1968
Remimeo
All Franchise
and Orgs
Division 6 Hats
DISSEMINATION
A PC RARELY DISSEMINATES. ONLY AN AUDITOR DISSEMINATES.
We know this from experience.
Thus an Org which makes more pcs than auditors will tend to
collapse.
Also an Org which makes only pcs will collapse.
So always make an equal number of auditors and pcs or more
auditors
than pcs.
This will ensure dissemination to the field as the auditor will
understand what he is disseminating and will therefore be successful.
Public Aide
for
LRH:ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
91
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 OCTOBER 1968
(Cancels HCO PL 20 March 1964)
Remimeo
TECHNICAL REPORTS
The Class VIII'S have, been assigned to Orgs to ensure that
Standard
Tech goes in and Stays in. They are responsible for ensuring that all
cases
are properly supervised.
Orgs with Class VIII auditors do not send copies of auditing
reports
to LRH or WW. Orgs without Class VIII's continue to send them to LRH
via Tech
Sec WW.
Orgs with Class VIII's should send in a weekly report regarding
Tech
results, and the Org LRH Comm should randomly select reports of one
preclear
being audited in Tech and in Qual to send to Tech Sec WW for
inspection.
All Academy Student reports shall be addressed by the student to
LRH
personally and sent via Tech Sec WW. Such reports shall be on a weekly
basis.
Tech Sec WW Mark Jones
Qual Sec WW Mark Jones
HCO Area Sec WW Edith
Hoyseth
Ad Council WW Rodger
Wright
Chairman
LRH Comm WW Rodger
Wright
D/Guardian WW Jane
Kember
Guardian WW Mary Sue
Hubbard
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ei.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 NOVEMBER 1968
Remimeo
SENIOR POLICY
We always deliver what we promise.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
92
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
BLUE ON WHITE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE FROM L. RON HUBBARD
FO
LRH ED 81 INT Date 20 January
1969
A VITAL TARGET
Trained Auditor Programme
It is vital that we step up auditor training in all orgs.
The VITAL target is
TO HAVE TRAINED AUDITORS IN PLENTY IN ORGS AND FIELD.
My data is that we must have specialized in preclears for quite
a while,
that staff training as auditors went out and that we began to develop
backlogs
of pcs.
Backlogs of pcs must be avoided.
Trained auditors by far make the better executives. Thus staff
auditors get promoted to execs and the staff auditor vacancies aren't
filled.
We used to allow for this. Many Academy graduates came on staff
as staff
auditors routinely. HGC auditors then got promoted to executives.
Staff training programmes permitted staffs to get to be trained
auditors
on a part time schedule.
In London we used to hire typists and clerks from employment
agencies. A
large percentage of them, with no urging at all, saved up and took
advantage of
their 50% staff discount and got their HPA, then came back on as staff
auditors
and went on to other staff posts. Either training got too long or too
involved
or the route got barriered.
In any event each org should take responsibility for getting the
route
unplugged. People who came on staff came from the public as just-a-job
or from
the Scientology field, got trained, became staff auditors, etc.
I know in orgs where I have worked I usually had to unblock
hiring. For
some reason I had to do it. All sorts of barriers got put up to people
who
wanted on staff. I used to hear of people and by pass and get them to
be put on.
Also, I used to order a sign in PE to get PE attendees to join
staff and a
sign in the Academy to get graduates to join staff. This was SOP.
When an org is signing up more pcs than students it will go
broke or be
poor.
The 50% scholarship offer (50% of fees) mailed out used to work
well. It
could be mailed to FSMs to hand Out to prospective students. If the
scholarship
only applied from Dianetics to HPA and not to segments, it would boom
training.
Some orgs just plain try to be clinics. The public loves to take
no
responsibility and be given it all as pes. When they get to Solo and
above they
wish to hell they had become real auditors.
You can jam the training line by making an Academy Course long
and as
heavy as an SHSBC.
The REAL design of training (if anybody would really do it this
way) is:
Dianetics: Fast Course on Technique. Slide by on philosophic
data.
93
Academy: Fast Courses on Technique. Learn all the motions.
SHSBC: A course taking in ALL the data, philosophic, with
polishing of
Technique.
Class VIII: Sharp rapid STANDARDIZATION of auditing and case
supervising
with 100% gains.
When you try to standardize Class VIII style the Dianetic
course, or
SHSBC, the Academy courses, you slow people down to nowhere.
Now that we have Ethics in and VIlls in every org WE CAN RESTORE
ATTESTATION. When we knocked it off we also knocked down our stats.
Ron's
Journal 1968 will RESTORE ATTESTATION OF GRADES AND CLASSES. This will
speed
up training again and raise stats. It works only if you keep Ethics
in.
This is my immediate contribution to MORE AUDITORS.
After all, early auditors weren't all that well trained. And
training
parallels the progress time track of the subject!
BUT as we EXPAND we will CONTINUALLY FACE THE PROBLEM OF AUDITOR
SHORTAGE.
Therefore YOU make a contribution on your end of it by making
the lines
open. Post staff procurement signs. Get staff trained up. Get the
public to get
trained.
Executives who aren't trained auditors have the highest
mortality rate as
executives. How can anyone really guide a Scientology org who doesn't
know the
subject.
So let's keep this Target up there as a big Target:
TO HAVE TRAINED AUDITORS IN PLENTY IN ORGS AND FIELD.
Train staffs is part of the Target.
Sign up more students than pes is part of it.
Push Training in Promotion is part of it.
We used to tell people that training as an auditor made one more
able to
handle life and his fellows. It didn't mean one became a professional
auditor
and hung out a shingle. We better hit this campaign again.
Anyway, it's a key Target, a big one. It is a Vital Target, what
we have
to do to make things go at all.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
SEAL
94
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 JANUARY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
MAINTAINING STANDARD TECH
Although by Ron's words Sea Org Missions will be policing the
correct
exact application of standard technology, a safeguard against
violation of the
standard of financial nature is hereby established.
This has been done to increase organisational awareness that
standard
tech is not solely the responsibility of the auditor and case
supervisor. They
need to be backed in their efforts by the full organisational
structure and the
members this comprises.
STANDARD TECH IS CORRECT EXACT DUPLICATION OF SOURCE IN
APPLICATION AND
IS ACCOMPLISHED BY COMPLETE ORGANISATIONAL ENDEAVOUR.
Each org member is to some extent responsible for the technology Ron
gave us.
As from the day of this policy letter every Org employing Class
VIII
technical staff, is going to be fined the sum of 1000.00 for every
GROSS goof
which was found allowed to slide by unhandled. The keyword is
UNHANDLED. Goofs,
although they shouldn't occur may sometimes happen, but standard tech
resolves
all cases including goofs. However a case allowed to leave the Org
attested to
as complete, with unhandled out tech on the case is not merely a goof
but a
false report.
In such cases, were they ever to occur, a fine will be levied,
payable AT
ONCE to the Sea Org. And this money is payable out of the Financial
Planning
allocation. So it will really be in all members' interest that Out
tech does not
occur, and in the event of it ever happening to take strong action
against the
sinning party.
Tech is very very simple, but also very very accurate since the
advent of
VIII. Tech is tech, it is IN or it isn't.
RON'S TECH IS STANDARD TECH AND HAS NO VARIABLES OR ARBITRARIES.
IT IS
RIGHT OR IT IS WRONG WITHOUT ANY SHADES OR GRADIENT IN BETWEEN. And
that is
that.
As Standard Tech is IN and winning it is not expected that any
fine will
ever have to be levied, and none will be retroactively. But they will
be in any
case found in future where violation is found unhandled.
Ron gave us standard tech, you apply it and we will police it.
And so
we'll all grow stronger.
Lt. O.J.
Roos
Flag C/S
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:OJR.ldm.ei.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
95
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 OCTOBER 1969
Remimeo
Tech & Qual
Personnel
TECHNICAL DIVISIONS - PROMOTION AND RESPONSIBILITY
(Originally issued as ED 318 INT)
1. All Personnel of Tech Divisions are reminded that it has long
been a
function of this Division to promote itself.
2. Foremost and most obvious is the old dictum, that when Tech is
in, bodies
will come flooding in. Happy, satisfied preclears and students
will not be
quiet about Scientology wins. They will disseminate. Keeping the
Promotional Points for their Departments in an alert and
realistic way
will do the rest.
3. Letters of Procurement by the Departments of Processing and
Training are
very effective. Personnel of Tech do not sit back and expect
Dissem to
bring in all the students and preclears. They get busy
themselves writing,
telephoning, scheduling and Tech Services always gets advanced
bookings in
earlier. And they demand that Dissem get their enrolments up.
4. Directors of Processing get busy keeping Auditor Procurement
going and
work with Qua! to get Training Programmes in for already
Classified
Auditors in the Org and in the area. And they demand that
Personnel
Procurement bring in auditors and train and recruit auditors in
the
Academy. NO HGC SHOULD EVER BE SHORT HANDED FOR AUDITORS. Policy
clearly
allows for any qualified auditor in the Org to be used when
necessary
(P/L 28th April, 1965 "Technical Personnel"). But with good
Auditor
promotion and training this need not become necessary.
5. Tech Personnel, including Supervisors and Auditors take full
responsibility to see that they themselves keep trained and
checked out
on all necessary material for their departments. They don't wait
for Qual
to remind them or for Ethics to take action first. They make
sure that
Qual does train them and that there is no violation of High
Crimes Policy
of star rated checkouts (P/L 8th March, 1966 "High Crime").
6. Tech Services Personnel do not wait until Auditors or Students
complain
about lack of material-or wait for Boards of Investigation to do
their
job. They make certain that materials are provided and in good
condition.
They keep materials supplied to Auditors and Students and make
certain
that lines and routing is properly done. They are there to give
swift
happy-making service to Technical.
7. Technical Personnel do not natter, complain or go into apathy if
their
Pcs and Students are "held up too long in Qualifications". They
see to it
that HCO and Ethics speeds routing.
8. Technical Personnel do not sit and hope that Public Divs will
arrange
Public Lectures, HAS or other beginning Courses which will feed
people
into the Technical Division. The Technical Secretary has
materials ready
and personnel prepared to give these courses.
9. Technical Personnel realize that they are turning out the PRODUCT
of the
96
Organization-completed students and preclears who will bring
about changed
conditions on this planet, and that is what the Organization is
all about.
10. So Technical Division Personnel do not sit around and wait for
the rest of
the Organization to do the job. They keep busy doing their own
actions,
keeping their Promotional Points in, and keeping Technical in on
themselves.... and demand that the rest of the Organization help
keep them
supplied.
Hana Eltringham
Deputy Commodore
Flotilla
Rosalie Vosper - HCO Area Sec
WW
David Dunlop - Dep Qual Sec
WW
Ad Council WW
Anne Tampion - HCO Exec Sec
WW
Allan Ferguson - Org Exec Sec
WW
Tom Morgan - Public Exec
Sec WW
Rodger Wright - LRH Comm WW
Leif Windle - Policy Review
Section WW
Jane Kember - The Guardian
WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:HE:ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
97
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Cl VIII Checksheet
Dianetics Checksheet
Qual Sec Hat
Tech Sec Hat
C/S Hat
RIGHTS AND DUTIES
The following Rights and Duties are to be posted in the staff
area of
every Qual Division and Tech Division, where they will be frequently
seen by
auditors and technical personnel.
They are to be printed green on white in letters at least 1 inch
high,
each on a separate card (4 total).
AN AUDITOR HAS THE DUTY:
TO KNOW AND ABIDE BY THE AUDITOR'S CODE
TO APPLY TECH EXACTLY AS PER HCOBS AND LRH TAPES
TO BE THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITH THE FOLDER OF ANY PC HE AUDITS
TO FOLLOW C/S INSTRUCTIONS EXACTLY IN SESSION
TO REFUSE TO AUDIT AN INCORRECT C/S
TO AUDIT ONLY THOSE MATERIALS ON WHICH HE HAS BEEN CHECKED OUT
STARRATE
TO BE FAMILIAR WITH AND APPLY ALL NEW TECHNICAL MATERIALS UP TO
HIS CLASS
LEVEL
AN AUDITOR HAS THE RIGHT:
NOT TO AUDIT A PRECLEAR HE DOES NOT WISH TO AUDIT
NOT TO AUDIT MORE THAN 5 HOURS PER DAY, 6 DAYS PER WEEK
TO REFUSE A C/S HE KNOWS TO BE INCORRECT
TO ASK TO BE REFERRED TO THE HCOB COVERING A C/S HE IS UNCERTAIN
OF OR
FEELS IS INCORRECT
NOT TO BE PUNISHED FOR QUERYING A C/S WHETHER CORRECT OR NOT
TO HAVE PCS, AUDITING ROOMS, AND MATERIALS MADE AVAILABLE TO HIM
BY TECH
SERVICES
98
A CASE SUPERVISOR HAS THE DUTY:
TO REFUSE TO DISCUSS A CASE WITH EITHER THE AUDITOR OR THE PC
TO REFRAIN FROM DISCUSSING OR MENTIONING DATA FROM PC FOLDERS
SOCIALLY
TO CORRECT HIS AUDITORS' APPLICATION OF TECH POSITIVELY, WITHOUT
INVALIDATION
TO ORDER THE AUDITOR TO CRAMMING OR RETRAINING FOR ANY FLUNKED
SESSION
TO MAINTAIN A STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT TO C/S ALL
FOLDERS
DELIVERED TO HIM DAILY
A CASE SUPERVISOR HAS THE RIGHT:
TO HAVE HIS OWN OFFICE
TO HOLD NO OTHER POST
NEVER TO RUSH HIS OWN C/S ACTIONS
TO ACCEPT NO TECHNICAL ORDERS OR ADVICES OTHER THAN FROM LRH
TO DEMAND A HIGH ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OF THOSE WHO WORK ON
HIS LINES
TO DEMAND THAT PCS DO NOT DISCUSS THEIR OWN CASES OR OTHERWISE
VIOLATE PC
RULES
TO ISSUE AND GET COMPLIANCE ON ANY ORDERS NECESSARY TO THE
PERFORMANCE OF
HIS DUTY AND TECHNICAL RESULTS
Lt. Nate Jessup,
Chairman
Ens. Janet Guilford,
Secretary
W/O Bob Guilford, Member
Qual Board of
Investigation
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:NJ:JG:BG:nt.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
99
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 FEBRUARY 1970
Remimeo
All Orgs
AOs
SHs
E/Os Hat
T/Sec Hat
PES Hat
Dir Success Hat
ARC Br Reg Hat
PRO Hat
PRO Crse checksheet ETHICS
QUALITY OF SERVICE
ARC Breaks bring about and restimulate a desire to get even.
An ARC broken person attacks.
Criminals, revolutionaries, great generals are simply
dramatizing the
effects of an ARC Break of long duration.
Madmen seldom attack that which ARC broke them but choose wrong
targets.
Any and all attacks suffered by orgs are from ARC broken
persons.
Even when such persons were really ARC broken with some other
activity,
they instantaneously attack us.
Most ARC breaks are caused by by-passed charge. This charge is
usually the
restimulation of some earlier ARC break not caused by us.
WITHHOLDS ARE ONE PRIMARY CAUSE OF BY-PASSED CHARGE.
When persons are poorly processed or poorly trained they can
restimulate a
great deal of by-passed charge.
When persons are permitted to take higher grades without really
attaining
lower grades, by-passed charge is inevitable; hence we see refunds,
attacks and
upsets in orgs and the field.
The true cause of ARC Breaks of long duration which transfer to
us is when
we permit technical goofs.
ETHICS exists primarily to see that people honestly make their
grades and
are trained as they should be and that no-one is permitted to prevent
good
auditing and good training or to enturbulate the org so that it cannot
occur and
to make sure the org is there to give service in volume.
Ethics is not concerned with "acceptable social behaviour" only
insofar as
it impedes the training or processing of others.
THEREFORE: Accepting for higher levels of processing persons who
have not
made their lower levels shall be classified as a crime.
Processing persons at higher levels who have not made lower
levels shall
be classified as a crime.
100
Training persons at higher levels who have not proven themselves
as
competent Dianetic auditors shall be classified as a crime.
Admitting a famous person or notable writer to higher level
processing
who has not fully attained lower level processing shall be classified
as a HIGH
CRIME. This applies in particular to Power and Clearing Courses.
Administering Power to anyone who has not had Dianetic Triples,
Scientology Triples and adequate gains or who needs further auditing
or Review
shall be deemed a crime.
Permitting an ARC broken person to leave an org unhandled shall
be deemed
for the last auditor to audit him and for the PBS and Director of
Success a
crime.
Failure to strenuously act to clean up an "ARC broken field"
shall be
deemed a high crime for the Executive Council.
ALL ETHICS OFFICERS are to regulate their conduct of duty so as
to
safeguard good auditing and training in the organization and to create
a calm
atmosphere where these can occur in volume.
This Policy Letter has first priority and claim on the duties
and
attention of the Ethics Officer.
In interpreting the above in technical matters, the Ethics
Officer should
consult the opinion of competent auditors not connected to any charge
in
progress.
Nothing in this Policy Letter shall prevent Scientology grades
before
Dianetic Grades.
Nothing in this Policy Letter shall limit the amount of auditing
that a
person can be given at any one grade.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jz.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
101
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 MAY 1970
Remimeo
IMPORTANT
CUTATIVES
In the period up to 1966 we were plagued by an occasional
obsessiveness
to ADD to any process or policy. Additives made things unworkable.
After 1966 when I left the post of Executive Director WW, a new
condition
set in. Cheeksheets, processes, intensives, grades began to be CUT
DOWN.
This we can dub a CUTATIVE impulse to coin a word.
So persuasive were its advocates that even I was persuaded to
agree to
some points of it so you need not feel bad if you were gulled into
buying the
idea of shortening things in order to produce a quicker result.
No one really saw where the trend was going.
In 1970 a survey I have just completed has shown that this
effort was so
complete that the following had been broadly accomplished:
A. Training no longer included enough Scientology materials to make
an
effective Scientology auditor in many places.
B. Grades had been shortened from 50 hours 0 to IV to 21/2 minutes.
C. The End Phenomena of grades and processes were discarded.
The end result has been:
1. Few skilled auditors.
2. Shrunken and struggling Scn orgs.
3. A field that is disappointed in results-for they think they have
had
grades and haven't.
4. People coming into Advanced Orgs to be cleared who have NO lower
grades
actually run and so they can't make any upper grades.
In effect Scientology was thrown away. From total workability it
was cut
down to occasional result.
I saw the first impulse of this in an executive long since
dismissed from
Saint Hill as a constant overt no-case gain case who agitated
constantly to
remove tapes from the Saint Hill Course. As 90% of the data on the
SHSBC is on
tape I merely thought he had gone over to the enemy and ignored him.
Some
others, however, had the same idea and started labeling basic books
and
bulletins "Mere Background Data" or saying "We don't use that now" or
"That's
old and you only look at it for interest". Thus the laws of listing
and other
phenomena were thrown away.
Recently I found the reason Case Supervisors failed is that they
just
don't know "The Original Thesis" and "Evolution of a Science" or "Scn
8-80" or
"Scn 8-8008". WHEN I DEMANDED THEY STUDY THESE BOOKS THEY BECAME
CAPABLE OF
HANDLING CASES. They did not know what they were handling-the mind-and
so
102
how could they be sensible in ordering what was to be run on a case?
Back in 1950 we used to have a small bunch of goony birds, ex-
psychologists, ex-lunatics. They were constantly demanding a 2 second
action
that totally cleared someone. Behind this was an inability to
concentrate
attention or even to work. These were people striving for total effect
instantly. Yet they couldn't run with reality on any process heavier
than "How
are you?" and they never saw a wall-they saw a mock up of it!
So the impulse of DO IT ALL NOW NOW that destroyed any sanity of
psychiatry is always around.
A student with a one item checksheet who does it in one minute
is the
ideal course to such.
A preclear run for 21/2 minutes to total top grades becomes an
ideal
auditing session to such.
Such things just aren't real. And such unreality got into the
lines too
hard and is being escorted right back out right now.
The following policies are in full force and are to be backed up
fully.
1. Course checksheets may not be cut, edited or reduced after a
fully
approved checksheet is issued for use on any course.
2. No grade may be awarded for which all processes of that grade
have not
been run and where the end phenomena of that grade is not
attested to
singly and fully by the preclear before an examiner.
3. Anyone found relegating basic materials to unimportance by
reason of age
or volume is to lose his post and certificates.
4. Any statistic claimed which is achieved by downgrading materials
or grades
or falsely pretending an end phenomena has been achieved for pcs
or skill
by auditors shall result in the dismissal of the division head
presenting
it.
5. No suppressive person with a fat ethics file and no case gain
may hold any
executive position in a Scientology org.
If you in any org or franchise are having any field or financial
trouble
you need not look further than errors pointed out in this Policy
Letter.
"Dianetic Triples" awarded after 11/2 hours of processing,
"multiple
declares" after 10 minutes from 0 to IV, using checksheets from which
all basic
material has been cut, the failure to realize gains and abilities and
success
have to be worked for to be true, are at the bottom of any trouble any
org or
franchise is having.
Beginning with the Pol Ltr of 10 May 1970 a more honest era has
began.
Scramble around and put it right.
Deliver Scientology not a Cutative.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dz.nt.ka.aap
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
103
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
BLUE ON WHITE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE FROM L. RON HUBBARD
LRH ED 107 INT [Excerpt] 3
June 1970
To: Class IV Orgs and Saint Hills for ACTION. AOs for Info.
From: Ron
Subject: ORDERS TO DIVISIONS FOR IMMEDIATE COMPLIANCE
[ORDERS TO DIVISION IV-Excerpted]
Reference: LRI-I ED 104 INT Auditing Sales and Delivery Pgm No. 1,
LRH ED 106 INT What Was Wrong
DIVISION IV
1. Assume all technical actions in C/Sing, HGC and Dept of
Training.
2. When a pc goes to Review Qua! is credited with the time taken
from the
hours the pc bought.
3. Only send a pe to Review when the C/S gives up. Don't let Review
give the
major actions that belong to the HGC.
4. Get your Supervisors (a) interested in the students' progress
and (b)
using two way comm (listen style) to speed up the students'
progress; (c)
get in Learning Drills on slow students.
5. Get blown students back in and using (a), (b) and (c) in 4 above
get them
going again.
6. Come down hard on any SP giving out with Scn materials being
"old" or "not
used now" or "background data" and any other mechanism to impede
its use.
(Modern C/Ses are having to study "The Original Thesis" and
other basic
books to find out about the subject. The data is not old, it is
basic.)
7. Completely throw out the idea that a fast result is a good
result in
auditing. Deliver auditing in volume as per the "Processes
Taught" Column
of the Class Chart. Do not skip any gradient going up in C/Sing.
Get him
on TRs and repair the pc's life before even beginning serious
auditing. Do
ALL the processes. To full End Phenomena. End completely this
brush off that is currently passing for tech.
8. Get studied all current HCO Bs and data on this program. Be sure
you get
HCO Bs now coming out that fill in these gaps to get Scientology
back into
its own.
9. Determine that students know their business and pcs get full
gains and get
this being worked at hard through the division.
10. Check this giddy impulse to do things so fast they're not done
at all.
Validate auditors who do a thorough job, Supervisors who are
interested in
and work with students to push them through. Preach attaining
honest
lasting results, real lower grades, real understanding of the
mind.
11. Courses should be fast, auditing drawn out. This is the exact
reverse to
what has been happening. Slow courses and fast auditing destroy
the
subjects of Dianetics and Scientology. Fast courses and long
long hours of
auditing are the route to real gains and solvency.
12. Man up Division IV with competent auditors, supervisors, a good
C/S, an
able Tech Services and plan how to man it up in the future as it
expands
and carry on
104
an orderly program of providing technical manpower for the
Division, not
depending on anyone else to do so.
13. See that students do a lot of mutual auditing. Don't get stumped
in
finding things to audit on each other. Force them over onto the
Class
Chart and every process known.
14. Get the division traffic lines flowing smoothly.
15. Handle backlogs by preaching training and getting more staff.
16. Whenever a pc goes Exterior (or any in your folders who have)
have him
called in for an Interiorization Rundown. Don't end off his
auditing and
don't audit past exterior without giving the Interiorization
Rundown. This
can be done at any stage of Dn or grade processing AND DOES NOT
COUNT AS
PART OF ANY GRADE.
17. Get out of any rut that goes contrary to this program.
SEAL
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dz,rd
105
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970
Remimeo
Applies to all URGENT AND
SHs and
Academies IMPORTANT
HGCs
Franchises
TECHNICAL DEGRADES
(This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every study pack
as the
first items and must be listed on checksheets.)
Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any
degrading
statement must be destroyed and issued without qualifying statements.
Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry "A. Background
Material-This
section is included as an historical background, but has much interest
and value
to the student. Most of the processes are no longer used, having been
replaced
by more modern technology. The student is only required to read this
material
and ensure he leaves no misunderstood." This heading covers such vital
things as
TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood.
These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the material
of the
Academy and SH courses IS in use.
Such actions as this gave us "Quickie Grades", ARC Broke the
field and
downgraded the Academy and SH Courses.
A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or
dismissal and a
full investigation of the background of any person found guilty, will
be
activated in the case of anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES.
1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and Scientology so
as to lose
the full theory processes and effectiveness of the subjects.
2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labelling any
material
"background" or "not used now" or "old" or any similar action
which will
result in the student not knowing, using, and applying the data
in which
he is being trained.
3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any course not
authorized
by myself and the SO Organizing Bureau Flag.
4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use meanwhile
any such
comments as "historical", "background", "not used", "old", etc.
or
VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS.
5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on
the pc's own
determinism without hint or evaluation.
6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV.
7. Failing to use all processes for a level.
8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as "I put in
Grade
Zero in 3 minutes." Etc.
106
9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial or
labor saving
considerations.
10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of Dianetics
and
Scientology to use or impede its use or shorten its materials or
its
application.
REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get pcs
processed
in orgs was considered best handled by reducing materials or
deleting
processes from grades. The pressure exerted to speed up student
completions and auditing completions was mistakenly answered by
just not
delivering.
The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by using 2
way comm
and applying the study materials to students.
The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make each
level fully
before going on to the next and repairing them when they do not,
The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network in
the late
60s is entirely answered by the actions taken to shorten time in study
and in
processing by deleting materials and actions.
Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and Scientology
is the
answer to any recovery.
The product of an org is well taught students and thoroughly
audited pcs.
When the product vanishes, so does the org. The orgs must survive for
the sake
of this planet.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
107
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 SEPTEMBER 1970
Remimeo
(This paper issued at the beginning of Dianetics
is of considerable historical interest
giving the basis of the Auditor's Code
and policy on psychotics)
INSTRUCTION PROTOCOL
OFFICIAL
L. Ron Hubbard
FOR STAFF ONLY - NOT FOR STUDENT OR GENERAL ISSUE
November 20,
1950
(This is the first instruction protocol issued over my signature. Any
earlier
material circulated was for the purpose of gaining data in order to
prepare this
protocol. LRH)
Any school of mental. healing in the past has been victimized by
that
irrationality known as psychosis. Dianetics, no matter if it has the
answer to
psychosis, is yet victimized by its existence in the society.
Psychotics, people with histories of known breaks, of suicide
attempts, of
homicidal tendencies, can yet be expected to apply for instruction in
dianetics.
An adequate screen has been set up to inhibit the entrance of
such persons
into training. A Minnesota Multiphasic, at least, must be given to all
applicants for certification course training. This very far from
guarantees
insurance against enrolling a psychotic. psychometry is not accurate
and varies
from over-optimism to over-pessimism about psychotics. Therefore, all
psychometry must be tempered by common sense. Also, it must be
modified by what
we know dianetics can readily do for people.
A psychotic discovered by screening should either be routed into
processing (if the case is mild and non-suicidal) or rejected. At such
time as
the Foundations possess adequate and lawful housing facilities for the
retention
of psychotics, those who might have been turned away may be routed to
the unit
which has such facilities in its charge. Efforts are being made, and
others
should be made, to procure such sanitarium facilities wherein
psychotics may be
dianetically processed.
Once enrolled, the applicant, any applicant, should be regarded
to some
degree as a possible error in screening. A definite program of
allowance for
possible screening errors must consistently be adhered to.
Experience has demonstrated that psychotics may be enrolled and
successfully released and trained. The strain on the school staffs,
however, has
been great; and the cost of enrolling a psychotic definitely exceeds
the amount
he has paid for his course. In Los Angeles, in August, about thirty
percent of
those enrolled, it has been estimated, were incipient psychotics.
Turmoil was
occasioned by this, training expense was raised well above training
income in
each case. This does not argue, however, that the enrolling and
training of
psychotics is without danger.
As an additional safeguard, the following observations should be
taken
into account. Wherever any trouble has been had with a student in
training, one
of the following factors has been present.
1. The student was run while tired or when lacking in proper
food.
2. The auditing the student received was bad, extremely bad.
108
3. The student had in his environ, while in training, an
individual who
definitely and demonstrably sought the mental failure of the
student.
4. Too many auditors worked on the student.
5. Dianetics, in the hands of some students, was crossed with an
older
therapy.
Directors of Training and Team Captains should do all possible
to obviate
the occurrence in training of any of the above five factors.
All training programs should have as their end the turning Out
of
certifiable students. This means that the student's own case must be
running
well and that he must have absorbed maximal dianetic information and
acquired
maximal skill. Obviating the above five factors pays the additional
dividend of
proofing the school against bogged-down cases, by which is meant those
cases,
not psychotic, which cease to run well. The above five factors not
only threaten
the psychotic but are responsible in bogged-down cases. A bogged-down
case does
not find himself able to absorb information or acquire skill and
certainly
cannot be said to be running well.
To militate against the above five factors, to prevent any
untoward
incident should any psychotic slip through screening unobserved and to
prevent
bogged-down cases, the following program is the official school
program.
The student is enrolled on a four weeks course basis. At the end
of this
course, if certifiable by all criteria, the student is granted a
limited
certificate, printed in black and white, on which the words LIMITED,
EXPIRES SIX
MONTHS FROM DATE, is printed boldly. In order to gain an unlimited
certificate,
then, the student must, after graduation, release two persons, one of
a mental
condition and the other of a serious chronic somatic and must furnish
to the
Foundation incontrovertible evidence from a medical doctor and
psychometrist
that this has been accomplished. When the Foundation receives such
information
and such incontrovertible evidence, the Foundation then forwards an
unlimited
certificate to the student. The student need not again appear at the
Foundation. But on being given his limited certificate, he is also
given a
written paper, stating exactly what he has to do to get his permanent
certificate. The research division will furnish the protocol for this-
as to.
what is acceptable evidence; and this protocol is based on what the
research
division can use as a major proof case.
The student, however, is given an alternative. He knows that it
will be
expensive for him to get examinations of patients and psychornetry on
them. He
may submit as one of his cases his own intensive run of a Foundation
patient or
applicant, the Foundation doing the medical examination and the
psychometry for
him. The charge to the student is on the basis of one week's
additional
experience and instruction for $75.00. This is cheaper than a case
would cost
him. He can actually stay for two weeks and get both his cases from
Foundation
applicants and patients at a cost of $75.0O for the additional-second-
week. The
advantage to him is additional tips and instruction as he runs his
first
independent case or cases, that the Foundation handles all
examinations and that
his permanent certification is thus speeded up. The Foundation
advantage is that
it has a better chance to observe prospective employees.
By this means and others, the school then arranges for every
applicant,
within reason, to have a thirty-six hour run during his first week by
a student
auditor in his fourth or fifth week. This is no part of the guarantee.
It is
simply done. Directors of Training can then assign one fairly reliable
auditor
to one incoming case and so obviate some of the above five factors.
The protocol of training for a student is then as follows:
1. Entered after screening by psychometry and interview.
109
2. For the first week, a thirty-six hour intensive run and
general
indoctrination.
3. For the second week. Training in theory.
4. For the third week-training in practice, strongly supervised
by team
captain, given adequate examples of auditing.
5. For the fourth week-additional training in practice; or, if
good
enough, given a new enrollee for a thirty-six hour intensive.
(Does not
count for permanent certification.)
6. For the fifth week, if enrolled-a thirty-six hour intensive
on a
chronic aberration case or any case.
7. For the sixth week, if enrolled-a thirty-six hour intensive
on a
chronic somatic case or any case.
The student's own case may be more or less neglected after his
first week
of intensive running immediately after enrollment. If the case
requires further
processing before limited certification can be given, the student can
make his
own arrangements. He is there to be trained, basically, not to be
processed.
Special arrangements for processing to the end of being certified can
be made by
the Registrar.
This protocol has been developed after consultation with the
Foundation
Registrar at Elizabeth, the Director of Training at Elizabeth, and
upon
observations made during the past five months. If followed closely, it
should
adequately proof the schools against having psychotic breaks occur in
them and
against cases bogging down. Further, it should heighten the percentile
of
students certified.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ddb.rr.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
110
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1968
Auditor 43
Class VIII
All Auditors
THE AUDITOR'S CODE
ADI8
In celebration of the 100% gains attainable by Standard Tech. I hereby
promise
as an auditor to follow the Auditor's Code.
1. I promise not to evaluate for the preclear or tell him what he
should
think about his case in session.
2. I promise not to invalidate the preclear's case or gains in or
out of
session.
3, I promise to administer only Standard Tech to a preclear in the
standard way.
4. I promise to keep all auditing appointments once made.
5. I promise not to process a preclear who has not had sufficient
rest and
who is physically tired.
6. I promise not to process a preclear who is improperly fed or
hungry.
7. I promise not to permit a frequent change of auditors.
8. I promise not to sympathize with a preclear but to be effective.
9. I promise not to let the preclear end session on his own
determinism but
to finish off those cycles I have begun.
10. I promise never to walk off from a preclear in session.
11. I promise never to get angry with a preclear in session.
12. I promise to run every major case action to a floating needle.
13. I promise never to run any one action beyond its floating
needle.
14. I promise to grant beingness to the preclear in session.
15. I promise not to mix the processes of Scientology with other
practices
except when the preclear is physically ill and only medical
means will
serve.
16. I promise to maintain Communication with the preclear and not to
cut his
comm or permit him to overrun in session.
17. I promise not to enter comments, expressions or enturbulence
into a
session that distract a preclear from his case.
18. I promise to continue to give the preclear the process or
auditing command
when needed in the session.
19. I promise not to let a preclear run a wrongly understood
command.
20. I promise not to explain, justify or make excuses in session for
any
auditor mistakes whether real or imagined.
111
21. I promise to estimate the current case state of a preclear only
by
Standard Case Supervision data and not to diverge because of
some imagined
difference in the case.
22. I promise never to use the secrets of a preclear divulged in
session for
punishment or personal gain.
23. I promise to see that any fee received for processing is
refunded if the
preclear is dissatisfied and demands it within three months
after the
processing, the only condition being that he may not again be
processed or
trained.
24. I promise not to advocate Scientology only to cure illness or
only to
treat the insane, knowing well it was intended for spiritual
gain.
25. I promise to cooperate fully with the legal organisations of
Dianetics and
Scientology as developed by L. Ron Hubbard in safeguarding the
ethical use
and practice of the subject according to the basics of Standard
Tech.
26. I promise to refuse to permit any being to be physically
injured,
violently damaged operated on or killed in the name of "mental
treatment".
27. I promise not to permit sexual liberties or violation of the
mentally
unsound.
28. I promise to refuse to admit to the ranks of practitioners any
being who
is insane.
________________________
Auditor
________________________
Date
________________________
________________________
Witness Place
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Note: Nos. 26, 27 and 28 have been added per HCO PL 2 November 1968.
112
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 APRIL 1970
Issue II
(Formerly issued as FO 2175,8 Nov 1969)
Remimeo
Tech Services
Hat
4th Mate's Hat
Tech Sec
Qua! Sec Hats
AOsSHs
TECH SERVICES
THE PURPOSE OF TECH SERVICES IS TO GET AUDITORS, PCS AND
MATERIALS
TOGETHER AND IN AN AUDITING ROOM ON SCHEDULE SO THAT AUDITING CAN
OCCUR
AND WITH MINIMAL LOSS OF THE AUDITOR'S TIME.
How to get this done is modified by the situation of quarters.
Normally there is a board showing auditors pcs room assignments.
There is a layout of auditing and report forms, ball points,
paperclips,
staplers, an in and out shelf area big enough to hold big auditing
folders.
The comm baskets of the auditors are usually also there.
There is a notice board for pcs for their letters or notices to
them or
individual messages.
There is a room plot so those in use can be indicated.
There is a waiting room for the pcs.
There are desks or tables for auditors to complete their
reports, when the
auditing day has ended.
There is a comm system handy.
There is a set of file cabinets where folders are kept.
There is administrative neatness and facilities to accomplish
the
purposes.
There is a system for collecting the pcs for the auditors.
If Tech Services is done and arranged well Auditor waiting time
is zero.
The pcs ARE COLLECTED UP BY TECH SERVICES never by Auditors.
Tech Services tries to prevent any long wait by pcs and gets
them in at
the last moment, but not so late that the auditor waits.
AN AUDITOR'S TIME IS GOLD. He never has to chase up pcs or
materials or a
newly charged meter. And he never should find his pc has not had
enough food or
rest to be audited, thus wasting the auditor's time. This is all up to
Tech
Services, however it is done.
113
In a big org Tech and Qua! each have a competent Tech Services,
the
Qual one being the smaller.
In Scn orgs Tech Services also arranges housing, has pcs met,
and
generally Operates as the pc host while in the org.
Also in a Scn org Tech Services does all the student housing,
handling,
folders, records and admin such as logs and roll books. One tries to
keep
students and pcs separated.
Tech Services is a busy place. As we!! as being efficient it is
also
friendly.
The capability of Tech Services can make or break the reputation
of an
org.
Undermanning Tech Services can be a very serious mistake. At a
SH it is
also served by tech-qua! pages and HCO Couriers. The routing to
Registrar after
services from C&A to Registrar by a page can mean up to 50% more
income or re-
sign ups and if omitted loses the org many customers.
Tech Services is an important post. Exactly how it is done is
qualified by
how it is done best for that org and area but ALL its functions must
be done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.cden
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
114
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, .D.C.
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1957
TESTING
The department of Testing administers tests to preclears and
students
every Saturday at 12:45 p.m., sharp and every Monday at 9:00 a.m., and
at
5:00 p.m. At these exact times, the door of the testing room is
locked, and
timed tests are administered immediately.
The Registrar signs up preclears on Saturday and sends them for
testing
that day at 12:45 p.m. New students are also tested at that time on
Saturday.
The Registrar signs up preclears and students before 9:00 a.m.
on Mondays.
Students are then directed to the Comm Course instructor, who sends
them for
testing at 5:00 p.m. .Preclears registered before 9:00 a.m. are sent
to the
testing room. After testing the Examiner sends them to the Director of
Processing. Preclears not registered by 9:00 a.m. are sent for
testing. After
testing the Examiner sends them to the Registrar. The Registrar then
signs them
up and directs them to the Director of Processing.
Any preclears who are late for the Monday morning testing period
will be
tested at 5:00 p.m., that day.
HGC auditors are available every Saturday afternoon and Monday
morning to
score the tests. The Examiner supplies scoring materials to the
auditors.
L. RON HUBBARD
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
SECRETARIAL OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Assn Sec HASI - LONDON
cc: Hats
Dir Pro & Reg
Dir of Processing November 23, 1958
Dir Admin
Processing Admin
SCIENTOMETRIC TESTING
All testing comes under heading of Processing Administrator who
administers tests and keeps files. He is assisted by specifically
assigned staff
auditors during peak loads.
All tests are to be separated out of CF and One copy of a
profile giving
earliest and latest OCA and IQ results only are left in files. All
actual papers
and original graphs are filed in test files where they can be easily
viewed by
staff auditors processing pcs and by Director of Processing doing
clearing
estimates on pcs who have been in before.. All report sheets on pcs,
case
analysis sheets, etc, are filed under pc's name in test files. All
record sheets
showing what auditor processed what pc and when are also kept so
individual
auditors' results can be read in the files.
One copy of the original profiles on every staff member are kept
in the
Business Personnel files but the original is kept in test files.
Test files are open to and used by the Executive Director,
Association
Secretary, Director of Processing, Director of Training, Director of
Promotion
and. Registration, Training Administrator, Processing Administrator
and staff
auditors and instructors. They are of great use in bettering cases,
instructing
and registering pcs. They are also of great use to HCO Research, to
whom they
really belong. Therefore it is paramount that they be complete and
accurate.
Money can be spent putting these files in order and keeping them in
order
independent of the time of staff auditors or the Processing
Administrator. .
The effective date of this project is the date of this order.
L. RON HUBBARD
Executive
Director
LRH:mp.rd HASI
115
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 APRIL 1959
(CONVERT)
ADDITIONAL STAFF AUDITORS
In order to procure enough auditors for the HGC and to conserve
unit pay,
the following system may be used:
All auditors on administrative posts excepting only department
heads shall
be listed in order in such a way as to avoid consecutive listing from
one
department.
Thereafter, this rotating list shall serve as an "on call" list
for staff
auditor duty.
All short term pcs, so far as feasible, shall be assigned
against list and
long term pcs shall be assigned to regular staff auditors.
Example: Smith, HPA : CF Clerk
Jones, BScn : Tr Admin
Brown, HCA : Letter Registrar
Peters, HPA : Address files,
etc, down through all Admin staff.
An extra staff auditor is needed one Monday. Smith is assigned
to the pc
that week.
The following Monday a staff auditor is needed. Jones (whose
name comes
next) is assigned.
A month later another extra staff auditor is needed, Brown is
assigned,
since Smith and Jones have already done theirs.
When the end of the list is reached, it is started at the top
again. Then
two or three extra auditors are needed, two or three are pulled at
once.
The Admin staff person doing extra auditing spends all the time
left in
his working after auditing, at his own job, trying to keep it caught
up.
I have seen so many staff posts stay vacant a week or three
without
bringing the Org to harm that this plan seems feasible.
Town auditors should be used, when used, mainly on evening and
weekend
pcs.
This plan also has the virtue of keeping auditors on Admin from
losing
out and getting rusty.
LRH:mp.gh.rd L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JUNE 1959
CONVERT TO A
SEC ED
STUDENT FILES
All Student Files are kept at the HASI to which they belong.
A master list of certified Student Files from each individual HASI is
to be
compiled and sent to HCO WW to hold. Any additions to this list should
be
submitted monthly.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gh.rd
116
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 NOVEMBER 1960
All Cen Orgs
PC SCHEDULING
The time a pc can be audited is decided finally by HGC only.
Prom Reg has no force to commit HGC to any auditing schedule.
Prom Reg
should be pleasant about it and "be sure that HGC can arrange it but
that it is
up to the D of P".
HGC must arrange matters as well as possible to suit the pc and
must get
the auditing done but may persuade, without creating an ARC break.
Prom Reg is not a scheduling agency, as this is a technical
function.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH: aec.js.bp.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JANUARY 1961
HCO Secs
Ds of P
CASE FILES
It is vital that the HGC retain a case file for every case it
ever
processes.
This specifically includes staff members.
All auditor's reports, assessments and notes and recommendations
concerning a case, including staff cases, must be part of this file.
This file must be available to staff auditors processing the
preclear.
Anything an auditor knows about a case, as a general summary,
should
be put in the pc's file for future reference, especially at the end of
an intensive.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
117
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MARCH 1961
Issue II
Cen Orgs
HCO Secs
Assn Secs
D of P
HGC Admin
Staff Auditors
HGC ADMIN PARTIAL HAT
STAFF AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT
A regular staff auditor should deliver a minimum of 25 hours per
week of
auditing.
Pc assignments must be such as to minimize auditor change from
intensive
to intensive.
Auditor change must be minimized on staff member intensives.
HGC Admin is responsible for the economy of auditor auditing
time and
minimum change of auditors on pc.
One or two staff auditors, depending on staff size, must be
constantly
assigned to auditing staff. They may not be shifted to outside pcs "in
an
emergency".
Staff auditing paid for by staff member units must be delivered
during
business hours and may not be delivered at night. The only exception
is staff
auditing for staff auditors (see Staff Intensive HCO Policy Letter).
Persons ordered to auditing, if remaining on staff, not paying
for the
auditing, should be audited at night by part time staff auditors or
for extra
pay for a staff auditor.
25 hour intensives should be delivered in one week. It is
economically
poor for the pc if a 25 hour intensive is stretched over more than one
week due
to PTP, etc.
The Interview section's Registrar or Consultant may not assign
auditing
hours to a pc, agree to pc's hours proposals or suggest auditing
periods. This
is only for HGC Admin to do.
All Auditor-pc-room-time assignments are done by HGC Admin. This
is often
a neat problem. It must be consistently well solved. All such data for
all
intensives should be posted on a blackboard.
Pcs may not be postponed for lack of auditors.
Spare HGC auditors are employed by HGC and trained by HGC and
given Admin,
preferably procurement, posts in the Org until needed. The posts of
ARC Break
Registrar, Asst Letter Registrar, CF Assistant, Asst Assn Sec Sec, HCO
Files,
HCO Asst Area Sec for hat assembly and redoing, Asst Accounts to get
files up or
statements straight, are all spare jobs at which a spare staff auditor
may be
employed to the benefit of all. This is the way ohe takes up HGC ebb
and flow of
pcs. The person is still a full time staff auditor and aside from
training or
conference period is left entirely under the other dept heads for the
Admin
work. This is also an excellent way to give a staff auditor who has
been
auditing many, many weeks straight, a "breather".
A spare staff auditor may not be employed on key posts in other
depts
where his or her sudden absence would disrupt lines.
118
Assignment of spare staff auditors is up to the Assn Sec.
It is easy to reduce units by having many staff auditors
delivering few
auditing hours per week because of stupid scheduling. It is more
economical to
have one or two spare staff auditors working in Admin as above.
It is not economical on the pc or the Org to deliver auditing at
the rate
of 3 or 5 hours a week to a pc. If the Org has several such pcs, give
them all
to one permanent auditor and fit them in as the pcs can handle, but
also as HGC
can handle.
Classes of staff auditors break down as follows:
Regular Staff Auditor-Giving 25 hours per week every week to one
pc a
week.
Staff Staff Auditors-Giving two 1 2-1/2 hour intensives per
auditor to
staff members in working hours. If there are two, divide the staff in
half and
schedule each half in rotation under one auditor so there is no
auditor change.
Irregular Schedule Staff Auditor-Audits all irregularly
scheduled pes.
Part time Staff Auditor-Audits for Org evenings or week ends.
Temporary Staff Auditor-Comes into Org once in a while to give
full or
part time auditing for HGC.
Spare Staff Auditor-Works in non-key Org posts to help procure
or get the
work up to date but is trained and conferenced.
A Regular Staff Auditor can be a spare staff auditor. But no
other type
listed above can be combined by policy stated herein.
Every auditor in the HGC must be given classification as above.
For
scheduling,. the letters representing the above classes should be
added to a
staff auditor's name in HGC Admin.
In reporting staff auditors in the weekly report, the above
classifications must be used.
Staff auditor assignment is important. It is done by HGC Admin.
It can be
done so badly that 33 Auditors on HGC staff can deliver only �170
worth of
auditing a week! It has just been done in an Org. Classify your
auditors and
avoid such a mess.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jl.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
119
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 AUGUST 1962
Central Orgs
BODY ROUTER HAT
This hat is in use in Washington DC, where it has been found
useful. It
can be used in other Orgs as a model hat.
PURPOSE: TO CREATE AND MAINTAIN GOOD 8-C BETWEEN TECHNICAL AND PrR
& R.
Monday Duties: Be in Reception at & 00 A.M.
Preclear: (new)
1. Take preclear from Reg over to HGC Admin for, case assessment.
2. Return PC to Reg for re-signup.
3. Take pc to Testing.
Students:
1. Take Student from Reg to Testing.
2. Take Student from testing to D of T's office.
Staff Applicant:
1. Take person from Reception to Testing.
2. Take person from Testing back to Reception.
3. Take person to Area Sec for SEC Check.
4. Take person to Org Sec for interview. Friday Duties: Be in
Reception
at 1.00 P.M.
Preclear:
1. Greet the preclear, have him or her wait in reception for
the
Ruds Check.
2. Hand him or her over to D of P.
3. Take the preclear over to testing.
4. If ending take preclear to Reception for D of P end
Interview.
Student: (Beginning)
1. Take student from Reg to Testing.
2. Take student from Testing to D of T's office.
Student: (Ending)
1. Take student to Testing.
2. Take student to HGC Admin's Office for Interview.
3. Take student to Reception and make appointment for him or her
with
Reg.
Staff Application:
Same as Mondays.
THIS POST IS HELD BY TWO PERSONS-ONE IN RECEPTION AND ONE IN
TESTING.
THEIR GENERAL PURPOSE IS TO 8-C ANYBODY FROM RECEPTION TO ANY
DEPARTMENT HEAD
AND BACK WHILE ON POST. AT PRESENT IT IS DONE BY TWO STAFF AUDITORS
PART TIME.
LRH:jw.cden Issued by: Peter
Hemery
Copyright ($) 1962 HCO
Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON
HUBBARD
120
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 APRIL 1963
Sthil
HAT OF COURSE ADMINISTRATOR
The Course Administrator for the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course
promotes interest in the Course, answers enquiries, books in students,
acquires
accommodation for them and supervises their arrival.
Students may expect assistance over such matters as permits,
renewal of
passports or any of the manifold problems attendant on arrival in a
strange
country.
If students have time and wish to make any explorations of the
UK the
Course Administrator will answer any enquiries regarding such matters
but will
not make travelling arrangements of any kind.
The cycle of action for entrance and exit of students on the
Saint Hill
Special Briefing Course begins and ends with the Course Administrator.
The Course Administrator is also available for help during the
Course. Put
a note on the Comm lines for an appointment. There is a terminal here-
it's up to
students to make use of this communication line.
The Course Administrator is the terminal for the outside world,
so make use of this communication line.
Thank you.
Issued by:. Mary Long
Course Administrator
HCO WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.aap
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: Text of above is same as 25 April 1962 except for
addition of paragraphs 4 and 5.]
121
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 MAY 1965
Registrar HAT TECHNICAL & QUALIFICATIONS
Tech Sec HAT DIVISIONS
Qual Sec HAT
Org Sec HAT DIVISION 4 - 5
Dir Accts HAT URGENT
Cashier's HAT
AUDITING FEES
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF PRECLEARS
SCALE OF PREFERENCE
There is a definite and positive Scale of Preference for
accepting and
scheduling preclears (including students sent to Review) for auditing
in the
HGC and in the Case Cracking Section of the Department of Review.
Last on the list is any person who seeks auditing as a favour
"to
demonstrate to others what it can do" or "because of importance as a
person".
The auditing of someone just because the result would "prove"
something or other
or because the person has money or power and might donate, by firm
policy since
1950, has been relegated to the "circular file" (the waste basket).
Giving
auditing away to such persons or their friends or children or
psychotic brother
in the asylum is in fact forbidden. Giving preference in scheduling to
such
persons is governed, when for pay, entirely by the Scale of
Preference. Such
bids are a snare and a delusion; it sounds good; it doesn't work Out.
Mr. Big
takes his place in line with Mr. Little, and the Scale of Preference
alone
applies.
The person who has to be audited AT ONCE for desperate reasons
is also
governed only by the Scale of Preference.
The person who will only be audited by a certain or special
auditor is
also governed entirely by the Scale of Preference (See A).
SCALE OF PREFERENCE
Assignment of Auditor and Preferential Scheduling is governed as
follows:
A. Best Available Auditors, earliest possible commencement;
Pcs Paying full rate Cash in Advance with the longest consecutive
auditing period purchased. Where two pcs have to be chosen between for the
best auditor, the one who has purchased the most auditing in consecutive
periods is given the best auditor at the earliest moment. (It is obvious
that to get a special auditor one should pay full public rate in cash even
when entitled to Professional Rate. Otherwise there may be no pc requested
auditor assignments. Buying additional auditing or offering a specified
donation in addition to the full rate as per A can also influence the
assignment of a requested auditor. The auditor does not have to accept.)
B. Skilled auditor (but not specially requested auditor), early
commencement;
Full rate pcs whose credit has proven excellent and prompt by past
experience.
C. Good auditor, early commencement;
Pcs paying cash in advance professional rate.
D. Auditor staff available scheduling;
Full public rate pcs with 50% deposit and unknown or not established
credit.
E. Interne Auditor and any scheduling convenient to org;
Full public rate pcs requiring up to 75% credit, credit unknown.
F. Any Interne Auditor, and any scheduling convenient to org;
Professional rate requiring credit.
G. Any student, any scheduling convenient to org; Total credit at
any rate,
credit unknown.
H. Students who need practice, cases not supervised except for
student check
sheet in Examinations, scheduled randomly or by waiting list, charity
or pcs on
full credit of a pcs unknown nature.
122
In scheduling there is also the problem of matching Interne
Auditors in
pairs so they can crack their own cases.
This is normally done by Case Parity. Cases more or less the
same in state
of case should be matched up.
Auditors who goof seriously in handling specially assigned
processes in
HGCs or Case Cracking Sections and are removed from active auditing
because of
it as dangerous, are normally paired with the last one who goofed and
they are
assigned as a co-audit team and they are permitted to slug it Out,
getting a
better reality on goofs and their cases in shape as well. This is not
disciplinary assignment. It is prevention of case damage to others,
both by
giving them a reality and by advancing their cases. Their folders are
carefully
watched by auditing supervisors for false entries on auditing reports.
-------------
The whole theory of the above is not Cash. It will be found that
those who
will pay were the most able to begin with and have the greatest value
to others.
Their worth as persons is greater. Thus good, swift auditing brings up
even this
value.
I have never thanked myself for giving any concessions on fees
or
scheduling not based on the above. I can say with complete case
histories that
giving free service to those who demanded it or sought it has never
resulted in
any useful gain for Scientology. On the contrary some of our biggest
headaches
administrationally come from those who continually sought free courses
and free
auditing.
In the case of award auditing or training it is a different
matter. Here
it was worked for and deserved before the fact. The Registrar is never
faced
with such persons as awards are given staff and staff has staff staff
auditors.
The "the world owes me a living" preclear (or student) is a
candidate for
the Better Dead Club. There were two branches of this Club, by the way-
Better
Dead for their own sakes and Better Dead for the sake of others.
Demands by
individuals for free service on any pretext should be given a light,
airy laugh.
It doesn't do anybody any good, often not even the person who received
it.
Real charity cases who never pay are actually hard to find. In
Charity
Auditing one must always give them a chance to pay.
A Registrar's matter of fact attitude about paying for auditing
or
training is a valuable asset. Giving the person a problem about how
and what
they'll pay is poor Registraring. Don't make them choose about paying
in full or
not paying in full. Just tell them "Go to the Accounts Cashier". An
evil laugh
when they advance the idea of some tiny down payment on auditing and a
remark,
"Well, that would put you on the waiting list and give you a new
student," might
be very effective.
Printing up the above preference scale for presentation to
falterers on
payment might be effective.
Accounts must always give Scheduling Personnel a copy of the
invoice.
Accounts must mark the Invoice clearly as per the above
preference scale.
Scheduling may only be done by scheduling personnel and must be
done in
accordance with the above Scale of Preference, and the prospective
preclear
already in the office (not On promotion lines) should be informed that
the above
scale exists.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mh.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
123
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 NOVEMBER 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo
Tech Sec
Qual Sec
PC SCHEDULING
When a low priority pc has reached the point of being scheduled
and has
started his auditing, the HGC Admin cannot and must not then take that
pc's
auditor away and put the pe back on the waiting list because a higher
priority
pc comes in.
The low priority pcs are only subject to losing their place in
line prior
to their actually being started.
To take a pc off auditing once they've started and give their
auditor to
someone else (sometimes, several times during that pc's power
processing) is a
breach of the Auditor's Code and as such, creates upsets and ARC
Breaks, besides
making a mess of scheduling.
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 JUNE 1966
Remimeo
Tech Sec
Qual Execs
All Students
KEEP ACADEMY CHECK SHEETS UP-TO-DATE
Any new HCO Bulletins which are issued and which are needed on a
particular level must be added to the Check Sheets for that level,
before the
student receives the check sheet.
The purpose of this policy letter is that of ensuring that
students are
trained in the latest materials pertinent to that level.
It is the responsibility of the Technical Secretary and the
Director of
Training to see that this is done.
The Qualifications Secretary and the Director of Examinations
must
likewise see that examinations cover the new data as it is issued and
correctly
examine students on the required material who have had such added to
their check
sheet.
This Policy Letter does not modify existing policy that a
student may not
have items added to a check sheet on which he has already started
working.
LRH:lb-r.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
124
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill. Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 MAY 1969
Remimeo
STANDARD ADMIN FOR TRAINING AND TECH SERVICES
Just as the Supervisor is there to communicate the course
materials to the
student and to see that they are fully understood, the Administrator's
function
of service to students is equally important.
The Administrator must see the data on the course being held is
available
and in sufficient quantity and quality.
MASTER CHECKSHEETS
Master Checksheets with the relevant alterations and corrections
where
necessary, and additions to the checksheet prior to reissue, should be
kept up
to date and fully available for the new student to the course.
In this way the
1. List of Data being studied is made known
2. Any typographical errors corrected and available
3. Any data issued since the last cheeksheet printed is made
4. Any data issued since the last checksheet printed OK'd before
added to the
checksheet.
Once a student has been issued a checksheet, that checksheet is
not added
to. The checksheets in stock and the master checksheet are added to
and kept up
to date.
Where stocks are down or much new data is issued the
Administrator
originates a request for the course checksheets to be updated and so
the
checksheet remains in PT.
LOGGING
The material of the courses especially Scientology Technical
material and
even more so the Advanced Courses (CL VI and above) must be kept in a
safe
place.
Each pack or book must be logged out. A record of this is kept.
It is
always kept.
The actual method of recording can vary but a system of who has
got what
MUST be made.
In the Sea Org a $10 deposit slip is signed. No money is handed
over and
if the pack is mislaid or lost $10 is to be paid.
An example of a card in use.
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
PACK COURSE
STUDENT'S NAME OUT IN
TIME DATE TIME DATE
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
They can be printed or mimeoed or written up by hand.
The Pack No. and Course and Level can be entered.
So the following takes place:
1. Student wants a pack
2. It is signed for on the correct card
3. Time OUT entered
4. Time IN entered
5. Dates entered.
A track must be kept of the materials including Books and tapes.
LRH:JB:an.ei.rd Written by W/O James
Byrne
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
125
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 MAY 1969
Remimeo
Dian Checksheet
Div 1
DIANETIC CERTIFICATES
A sign must be posted near the Registrar area and on the Student
Bulletin
Board in any org or groups teaching Dianetics.
ENROLLMENT ON A DIANETICS COURSE DOES NOT GUARANTEE A CERTIFICATE,
ONLY
EXCELLENT MARKS AND WELL DONE SESSIONS QUALIFY THE STUDENT.
LRH:an.ei.kd.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JUNE 1969
Dian Course
Super Checksheet
Dissem Secs
Tech Secs
Qua1 Secs
MATERIALS, SCARCITY OF
A hidden outness and training slower downer is materials,
scarcity of.
A whole course can be wrecked by lack of study materials.
Speed of Training was a major 1969 breakthrough. It takes only 2
weeks to
a month to make a competent Dianetic auditor using Standard Dianetics.
This can
be greatly retarded by study material scarcity.
The best way to handle this is to have plenty of study packs,
books and
clay.
Another way to handle it is to break the checksheet down into
parts A, B,
C and D and issue different sections of it to a broad new course. It
does not
greatly matter which one the student does first.
Material scarcity tends to equalize itself when a course enrolls
every
day. You gradually get a spread out of materials.
In past years study materials have been a continuing problem.
All possible
is being done to make this easier. But as Dianetics expands it will
probably
never cease to be a problem. It is a point which requires thought and
attention
on the part of every group, org, Course Supervisors and
Administrators.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
126
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 JULY AD 19
Remimeo
Dianetic
Checksheet
Class VIII
Checksheet
Case Supervisors
Dir Tech Services
AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT
POLICIES
One used to hear auditors complain, "Scientologists are harder
to audit
than new pcs". We know the answer to this now. It is Auditor Speed.
When an
auditor complains of this, he is revealing that he is a slow auditor.
Dianetics and Scientology (demonstrated by carefully controlled
tests)
greatly speed up reaction time. They also increase IQ rapidly and were
the
reason colleges came off their "IQs never change".
As a person is audited he becomes quicker mentally. Also he
becomes less
comm-laggy. Also he is more familiar with technology and his own case
and is
less afraid of himself and his "bank".
In assigning auditors to pcs if you do not pay attention to
comparable
grade levels between auditors and pcs you will have failed sessions.
Therefore it is policy not to assign an auditor whose grade and
class is
less than that of the pc.
Further, a good auditor deserves a good auditor. To assign a new
student
to audit a skilled and practised veteran auditor of excellent auditing
record is
suppressive. The new student or new graduate would probably be
intimidated just
at the thought of auditing someone who is far more expert-this would
magnify his
flubs and comm-lags.
Therefore it is policy to assign only good proven auditors to
good
auditors.
It is a suppressive act to assign a new or poor auditor to an
auditor who
has proven he can attain uniformly good results.
Slow auditors will be found successful auditing slow auditors.
This does not excuse not drilling slow auditors up to becoming
fast
precision auditors.
Good auditors are valuable. They should be safeguarded, given
favours and
even pampered.
Slow auditors should be drilled and given slow (new) pcs only
until their
own case gain brings them, with their drills, higher case gain and
thus higher
speed.
LRH:cs.ei.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
127
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 JULY 1969
Remimeo
Dian Supvr Course
All Supervisors' Courses
All Course Supvr
and Course Admin Hats
COURSE ADMINISTRATION
ROLL BOOK
Every Dianetics and Scientology Course has a course ROLL BOOK.
The purpose of the ROLL BOOK is to provide a permanent record of
all who
enrolled on the course and whether or not they graduated.
The Roll Book must be a thick hard cover foolscap size and well
bound
book.
On the inside first page is printed clearly-
Course name
Date book started
Name of Org, Center or Group
Date book completed.
Inside, the double pages are divided into vertical columns of
appropriate
widths as follows:
Student's full name
Permanent address
Local Address and Phone number
Date started on course
Invoice number
Date course completed
and two columns to note retraining
-dates started and completed.
In this book every student is logged, by the Course
Administrator, when he
joins the course, and every student is logged off the course upon
completion.
This book is used for roll call but only in so much as to
compile from it
the muster sheet, which is not a part of this book.
When the Roll Book is full, or at the end of the Course in the
case of a
non-continuing course, it is sent immediately in an Org to Dir of
Inspections
and Reports to be filed in VALUABLE DOCUMENTS files in Dept 3.
Thereafter it
remains in the charge of VAL DOCS IN CHARGE. In a Center or Group the
completed
Roll Book is securely kept by the Leader of the Center or Group. If
the group is
disbanded or ceases to operate, their Roll Books are forwarded to the
nearest
org.
Dir of I & R in an Org should from time to time inspect the Roll
Books in
use on courses and ensure that they are being kept in accordance with
this
Policy Letter, and that all completed ones have been turned in.
The Course Roll Book is the ONLY record of course attendance an
Org,
Center or Group has. The full application of this Policy Letter will
ensure that
the record is permanent.
Ens. Tony Dunleavy
LRH:TD:cs.ei.rd Planning & Training
Aide
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
128
FOUNDING CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FOUNDING CHURCH POLICY LETTER OF 13 MAY 1957
cc: Registrar
Dir/Training
Dir/Processing
Org Secty
Treasurer
Accountant
File
FINANCIAL ENROLLMENT PROCEDURE
The Registrar enrolls the student or preclear, fills out proper
forms such
as enrollment, release and note.
The Registrar accepts the money from the student or preclear and
takes it
at once to the Accountant.
The Accountant invoices the payment.
The Accountant writes any additional note payment on the invoice
but not
in the column of figures.
This entry says "Payments due so and so to such and such an
amount such
and such dates."
The Accountant gives the Registrar the White and a yellow copy.
The Registrar takes the white and. yellow copy back to her
office. She
gives both to the student or preclear.
The Registrar enters the person in a running record of
enrollment with
name, home address, local address and classification (student or pc).
The student or preclear keeps the white as his own receipt.
The student or preclear gives the Dir of Training or Dir of
Processing the
yellow when he reports.
From these yellows only when received from the student or
preclear, the
Dir of Training and Dir of Processing makes up his financial report.
No further information will be furnished Dir of Training or Dir
of
Processing by accountant.
The Registrar makes up no report sheet.
The Founding Church invoices no books or materials. Therefore,
only
student and preclear fees and note payments, donations, ordinations
and loans
are invoiced by the Founding Church.
The Accountant invoices all note payments. The Registrar does
not but can
receive these and take them at once to Accountant.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:md.rd
May 13, 1957
129
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
BLUE ON
GOLD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE OF 6 MAY 1958
MODIFIED PROCEDURE FOR SIGNING UP
PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS & PCS
1. Student/pc applicant interviewed by Registrar first.
2. Student/pc applicant interviewed by Dir Training/Processing.
3. Director TIP indicate on acceptance form exact number of hours
processing!
training course for which they accept applicant. If unacceptable
(as per
HASI Pol Ltr 8 February 1958) this must be specified.
4. Applicant returns to Registrar who then signs him up for
indicated number
of hours processing/indicated course; takes cash, etc. If
applicant hasn't
"time" he can sign up anyway even if he doesn't pay.
5. Applicant reports to auditor/classroom as per published
schedules.
Our criteria is not the amount of money or "time" the applicant
has: our criteria is: "Will this person become Clear in . . . . weeks?" or
"Will this person become a good auditor?" The amount of cash the applicant
has on hand is secondary in importance to these vital criteria. If he is
cleared or/and becomes a good auditor the financial problem will be solved
by him without great difficulty in due course.
Assoc Sec
per LRH
instructions
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
BLUE ON GOLD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MAY 1958
WHO SHOULD TAKE WHICH CLASS
The Dir Training should never instruct the advanced Academy
class, because
of the amount of administrative work he has to do. Director Training
preferably
teaches Comm Course. The Academy Senior Instructor should handle the
advanced
class and so no admin work. His job is making sure the student is an
auditor at
course end. The Academy Administrator should be the Upper Indoc
Instructor.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:rs.rd
130
HUBBARD COMMUNICTIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 AUGUST AD9
[Excerpt]
CenOCon
PROMOTIONAL FUNCTIONS OF THE ACADEMY
The first function of the Academy is to have a good Academy run
with tough
8C. For years it has been observed that a fine tautly scheduled
Academy that
puts students over the jumps and makes them into uncompromising
zealots for the
right way of doing things always attracts new students. A bad Academy
is always
badly attended. The grapevine here is so apparent that one only need
look at
Academy attendance to know Academy quality. This is the first line of
Academy
promotion. The second line of promotion in the Academy is using old
students to
get new students by letters and programs. Amongst these programs is
the
Extension Course.
LRH:brb.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Excerpted from HCO PIL 26 August AD9, Promoti�nal Functions of
Various Depts.
A complete copy is in Volume 7, page 135.]
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
GREEN
ON GOLD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 OCTOBER 1959
CenOCon
HANDLING STUDENTS' AND AUDITORS' REPORTS
(Cancels all previous directives on this subject)
Directors of Training are not to abbreviate their students'
reports in any
way. They are to send the full reports by surface mail to Ron at Saint
Hill, and
these will be returned.
Anything startling or dangerous that shows training improvement
or decay
should be briefed by the HCO Area Secretary in the Training Digest, so
that it
can be handled speedily.
All HCO Communicators are required to make sure that the
students' reports
are sent by surface mail and not by airmail. They are further
requested to see
that the students write legibly. If they do not, issue them infraction
theses.
Also see that they use flimsy paper to save bulk.
All Directors of Processing are to see that their auditors use
airmail
weight paper for their reports; Because of the weight, money is being
wasted on
airmail goods.
Copyright ($) 1959 HCO Secretary
WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
131
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 OCTOBER 1959
CenOCon
ACADEMY TRAINING
No student should ever be refused training. Processing can be
recommended,
but not insisted upon as a pre-requisite to training.
If a student is in bad shape, he'll never get passed off the HPA
Comm
Course and, of course, extra weeks cost more (L7. 10.0 per week in
Sterling
areas).
Students can always be recommended by the Director of Training
to come off
course and get processing in the HGC. But, never put a STOP on the
line before a
student has tried, that is, begun the course.
A potential student is reaching.
LRH:js.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959
Executive Director
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 JULY 1960
CenOCon
TRAINING APPLICANTS
It sometimes happens that an application for training is
received from a
person who is known to have a criminal record, or who would not be
able to pass
a security test, or who for some other reason would not be eligible to
receive a certificate.
In such cases, the person may be accepted for training, but he
must be
warned beforehand that no certificate will be issued if a security
check cannot
be passed. This, of course, is true of' all Academy applicants.
Peter Hemery
HCO Secretary
WW
LRH:js.cden for
Copyright ($) 1960 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
132
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 AUGUST 1960
Fran Hldrs
Ds of T
Registrars
Assn Secs
HCO Secs
TRAINING RESTRICTIONS
For the first time in our history, I am placing restrictions on
the
acceptance of students for training in Dianetics and Scientology.
It is important that these restrictions be placed in effect and
kept in
effect.
We are becoming too successful to take stupid risks as an
organization.
Several recent instances in various parts of the world showed
that we were
accepting security risks for training. In most cases our people stood
around all
sweetness and light and wouldn't believe as usual but in these cases
they
suddenly alerted to the fantastic liability of standing by a security
risk.
Therefore, no student . may be accepted for training by the
Director
of Training until he has been given a solid security check by the D of
T
personally. If the student fails to pass the test he is to be sent to
the HGC
for processing using the money deposited for training. When entirely
cleared
he may then be accepted for training and. Only then. Thus he is not
refused
training. But he may not be trained before he is cleared if he is a
security
risk.
State of case shall be used for rejection only when it is such
that he or
she is impossible to security check by reason of a stalled or wild
needle that
will not register.
These three reasons only may be used for rejection in addition
to the
above.
1. Has a criminal record;
2. Is studying Scientology to procure data or evidence for another
organization; and
3. Is a member of a subversive organization that might use
Scientology to
overthrow a government by force.
See that we get careful about this now.
Validation seals may not be placed on existing certificates
without
security checking for above.
L RON
HUBBARD
LRH:js.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
133
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 JANUARY 1961
Ds of T
HCO Secs
ACADEMY METERS
The Academy rates no meters for student issue.
As they can't possibly audit well after course without a meter
they should
be encouraged to buy their own before course.
SALES POLICY
HASI sells all meters sold on HP terms (time payment). HCO makes
all full
cash sales with discounts as allowable.
LRH:js.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 NOVEMBER 1961
Issue II
Gen Non- (Reissued 3 March 1967)
Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
Keeper of the
Seals and
Signature TRAINING QUALITY
It becomes fantastically, screamingly apparent that we must not
ever turn
out or let go a bad auditor, poorly trained.
Accordingly put permanent signs where D of T and Dir of Exams
can see them
in their offices as follows:
EVERY TIME YOU TURN OUT A BAD AUDITOR YOU MAKE ENEMIES
FOR SCIENTOLOGY.
INCOMPETENT AUDITORS ARE A MAJOR SOURCE OF OUR TROUBLES.
LRH:jp.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1967 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
134
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO Area Secs HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 DECEMBER 1961
Org Secs
Ds of T
CenOCon DIRECTOR OF TRAINING - WEEKLY REPORT FORM
Effective immediately-Directors of Training are required to make
a weekly
report on a form to be mimeoed in blue or black ink on flimsy quarto
white
paper, as follows: (Use this form routinely)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
LONDON (or name of your Org)
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING WEEKLY REPORT
WEEK
ENDING_____
NUMBER OF UNIT 1 STUDENTS ON COURSE DURING WEEK
____________
NUMBER OF UNIT 2 STUDENTS ON COURSE DURING WEEK.
____________
NUMBER OF EVENING HPA/HCS STUDENTS ON COURSE DURING WEEK
____________
NUMBER OF WEEKEND STUDENTS ON COURSE DURING WEEK
____________
NUMBER OF HCS/B.Scn STUDENTS ON COURSE DURING WEEK
____________
TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS ON ALL COURSES DURING WEEK
____________
NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATED DURING WEEK: HPA/HCA________ HCS/B.Scn
____________
NAMES OF NEW STUDENTS.
________________________ __________________________
________________________
________________________ __________________________
________________________
________________________ __________________________
________________________
________________________ __________________________
________________________
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING'S REPORT. (On progress of classes)
COMMENT OR REPORT ON INSTRUCTORS AND ON ANY NEW REQUIRED MATERIAL
BEING TAUGHT:
DATE: ________ SIGNED: .D of T
This form to be sent on Wednesday of each week together with
Instructors'
and Students' reports for the same period, to HCO Technical Secretary
WW at
Saint Hill. The D of T's report must be stapled 1st in the package,
with
Instructors' reports and finally Students' reports in that order.
Students' auditing reports are to be kept by the Organisation
and are not
to be sent to Saint Hill.
Students' reports will be kept at Saint Hill for at least 6
months and
then returned to the Organisation concerned for filing in each
student's folder.
The Director of Training is responsible for seeing that all
these reports
are done, collected together and forwarded correctly each week to HCO
WW at
Saint Hill.
LRH:EW:esc.rd Issued by: HCO Technical
Secretary WW
Copyright ($) 1961 for
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
135
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 DECEMBER 1961
CenOCon
EXTENSION COURSE COMPLETION
Students who finish the Extension Course should be sent a letter
or
document, signed by the Director of Training, stating that they have
graduated
from the course.
This will give the students a more definite end of cycle and
sense of
accomplishment.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:esc.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MAY 1962
Central Orgs
Academies
HPA/HCA TRAINING
HPA/HCA students, or auditors doing HPA/HCA retread, are
expected to
graduate after a period of 16 weeks or 48 weekends (proportionately
for night
HPA/HCA courses).
The Director of Training will frequently re-direct the student's
attention
to the course requirements, and instruct him if necessary:
(a) To have auditing at the HGC.
(b) To brush up and/or study data or background in
Scientology, attend
PE course, Anatomy of Human Mind course and the Co-audit,
and read
books or listen to tapes before resuming course.
(c) To handle his problems if any need handling, before
returning to the
course.
If the student cannot complete the course by graduating after
the 16 weeks
or 48 weekends, he will be allowed to complete it at the cost of �10.1
0.0 for
each additional week, or three weekends (proportionately for night
HPA/HCA,
proportionate cost in other currencies).
LRH:cw.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
136
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 OCTOBER 1962
HCO Secs
HCO Board of
Review
Central Orgs
PREPARATION OF HPA/HCA CERTIFICATES
No HPA/HCA graduate should be considered released from the
Academy until
he has fully completed Course requirements and he has passed his Oral
and
Written examinations and has satisfactorily completed his Certificate
Application Form. Delays in completing these last three items should
be minimal.
Providing his Course fees have been fully paid, or satisfactory
arrangements have been made for completing payment, on the day that he
is
released from the Academy the new Graduate is to be handed his HPA/HCA
certificate.
Therefore, instead of waiting until Course completion for
preparation of
certificates as previously, on date of commencement of HPA/HCA Course
a despatch
is written by the Director of Training to the HCO Board of Review
giving the full names of the new students who have commenced on Course.
HCO Board of Review will then proceed immediately with the
preparation of
these certificates. This follows the normal procedure except that
after I have
signed them and sent them back, they are placed in the Valuable
Documents Safe
and remain there until date of issuance. They are NOT to be embossed
with the
HASI Seal until the date on which the certificates are actually handed
to the
new graduates.
Delays in certificate issuance are to be obviated completely.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING WEEKLY STUDENT INTERVIEWS
The old policy of the Director of Training having a brief end-of-
week
interview with each student on Course in the Academy is herewith re-
introduced.
Progress in training that week should be the keynote of these
interviews
(not case).
LRH:gl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
137
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 AUGUST 1963
HCO Secs
Assoc/Org Secs
Tech Dirs
D/T Hat
"PLANTS" IN ACADEMIES - INTRODUCTION OF "FORM" SB
In times of expansion it is to be expected that occasionally a
government
"plant" or active commie will endeavour to gain access into the Org.
The Academy
is the easiest point of entry for a stay of a little time for such
undesirables.
For example, a wave of suppositional reports of this occurred after
the recent
FDA attack in Washington DC. If they were true then it was an affront
to
Scientology, quite apart from anything else.
However, such an attempt can be regarded, comparatively, as a
rarity.
Nevertheless, Directors of Training should have some easy foolproof
method to
pick off such and satisfy themselves that no students are in their
Academies for
anything other than what the students stated they were there for, i.e.
to
receive training and graduate.
The D/T normally interviews all new students before they enter
on course
in his Academy, and this stage would be a convenient point in which to
have a
fast check.
Accordingly, during the brief duration of this interview, the
D/T should
place the student on the E-Meter which is setat high sensitivity, and
ask with
ARC this question: "Are you here for any other purpose than what you
say/state?" This question may need clearing with student but it should take
only a very
brief time to clear and clean. Variations of this question may be
used, but this
type question designed as a fast check question on new students will
be referred
to henceforth as a Form 5B.
The D/T is merely to be satisfied that the new student being
interviewed
by him is not a "plant". Then, having cleared the question, and the
D/T is
satisfied the student is bona fide, the D/T can then brief the student
crisply
for starting course, etc, and bring the interview quickly to a close.
Remember, the question is designed to pick up "plants" and such
an attempt
will be very rare but nevertheless may occur from time to time. In the
event of
the D/T having some doubt on the person being interviewed by him, he
should
refer the person to the Technical Director immediately for a further
check.
The totality of the duration of the D/T interview need not be
more than 10
minutes in its entirety. Judgement is required by the D/T in
administering this
"filter point" in that it is not intended to act as a complete embargo
on all
and every student whether bona fide or otherwise. The chances of the
latter
being attempted are slim but this Form SB should now handlesuch an
attempt
smoothly.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
HCO Sec WW
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
138
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963
CenOCon
RIGHT TO REFUSE HPA/HCA STUDENT APPLICATION
The Director of Training has the right to refuse a Student's
application
for HPA/HCA training in the Academy, if the Student:
1. Cannot pass the SB check (see HCO Pot Ltr of August 8, 1963).
2. Cannot pass the 5A Security Check.
3. Has a chronic body condition for which he is under medical care
and/or
taking drugs (see HCO P0l Ltr of May 4, 1960).
4. Will not agree to abide by all Course rules.
If criminal past or blackmailable activities come to light on
the 5A
check, the person may sometimes "pass", but dubious cases may be
referred to the
Assoc Sec and HCO Sec, who may decide each case on its own merits.
If a prospective student obviously needs auditing or would be
better off
for some auditing first, he should be advised to obtain auditing
before going on
course.
LRH:dr.bp.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 DECEMBER 1964
General
Non-Remimeo
RE: OIC DATA
(In line with the Scientology boom as planned
in HCO Pol Ltr of December 3, 1964)
Even though the PB Course as such may cease in many Orgs, the
vital post
of Dir PB is maintained. In line with the purpose of the PE Dept
("Producing new
Scientologists") the Dir PB is still responsible for HAS procurement-
and for
getting new bodies into the Org. This also means that the number of
students on
the HAS Course will still be shown under PE Column on OIC cables-and
not under
the Academy.
Total number of students on all the higher level Courses, HQS,
HCA, HPA
and HCS, will, of course, still be given in the Academy Column.
In this way the Dir FE is responsible for getting the students
on to the
HAS Course, while the Dir of Training is responsible for running such
an
excellent HAS Course that the students would want to go on to the HQS-
and then
HCA and then. etc, etc.
Since HAS will be a paid-for Course, it is okay to include all
interviews
and sign-ups for HAS Course under the Reg-Interviews and Reg-signups
Columns.
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
139
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo
Dir Inspec & Rpts
DofT
Tech Sec
Org Exec Sec
HCO Area Sec
HCO Exec Sec
E-METERS AND BOOKS FOR
ACADEMY STUDENTS
There is a policy for Academies that each student own his own E-
Meter.
This is true for any level Academy Course.
It's up to the D of T to make sure his students own their own
meters and
are using B-Meters as per policy.
TEXTBOOKS
An Org Tech Div or any other part of the organization may not
provide a
library as a substitute for students buying their own textbooks. In
any non-
state supported grade school and in any college or university students
are
expected to buy their own textbooks for their courses. They are told
what to
buy before starting the course and do so. Don't violate this custom.
Also, students will do better if they own their own textbooks
as,
naturally, they will need them for reference.
Any Scientology book on a check sheet must be bought by the
student for
that course. This is true of Foundation courses also.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
140
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1967
Remimeo
Tech Div
Qual Div
THE SUPERVISOR'S CODE
(extracted from the ACC Manual published 1957)
Revised 15 September 1967
The Supervisor's Code has been developed over many years'
experience in
training. It has been found that any time a Supervisor broke one of
the rules,
to any degree, the course and training activities failed to function
properly.
Teaching Scientology is a very precise job, and a Supervisor
must maintain
the precision at all times to render the services he should to the
students
entrusted to his care.
A Supervisor cannot hope to gain the respect or willingness of
the student
to be taught by him sitting there, spouting words and being an
"authority" on
the subject. He must know his subject and follow the Supervisor's Code
to the
letter. It isn't a hard code to follow, and it is a very practical
one. If you
feel you cannot honestly follow all of it, you should receive more
training,
and, maybe, more processing until you can make the code your own
before
attempting to train students in Scientology.
We have had the rules of the game of Scientology a long time,
and now we
have the rules of the game called training. Have fun!
1. The Supervisor must never neglect an opportunity to direct a
student to
the actual source of Scientology data.
2. The Supervisor should invalidate a student's mistake ruthlessly
and use
good ARC while doing it.
3. The Supervisor should remain in good ARC with his students at
all times
while they are performing training activities.
4. The Supervisor at all times must have a high tolerance of
stupidity in his
students, and must be willing to repeat any datum not understood
as many
times as necessary for the student to understand and acquire
reality on
the datum.
5. The Supervisor does not have a "case" in his relationship with
his
students, nor discuss or talk about his personal problems to the
students.
6. The Supervisor will, at all times, be a source point of good
control and
direction to his students.
7. The Supervisor will be able to correlate any part of Scientology
to any
other part and to livingness over the 8 dynamics.
8. The Supervisor should be able to answer any questions concerning
Scientology by directing the student to the actual source of the
data. If
a Supervisor cannot answer a particular question, he should
always say so,
and the Supervisor should always find the answer to the question
from the
source, and tell the student where the answer is to be found.
9. The Supervisor should never lie to, deceive, or misdirect a
student
concerning Scientology. He shall be honest at all times about it
with a
student.
10. The Supervisor must be an accomplished auditor.
141
11. The Supervisor should always set a good example to his students:
such as
giving good demonstrations, being on time, and dressing neatly.
12. The Supervisor should at all times be perfectly willing and able
to do
anything he tells his students to do.
13. The Supervisor must not become emotionally involved with
students of
either sex while they are under his or her training.
14. When a Supervisor makes any mistake, he is to inform the student
that he
has made one, and rectify it immediately. This datum embraces
all phases
in training demonstrations, lectures, and processing, etc. He is
never to
hide the fact that he made the mistake.
15. The Supervisor should never neglect to give praise to his
students when
due.
16. The Supervisor to some degree should be pan-determined about the
Supervisor-student relationship.
17. When a Supervisor lets a student control, give orders to, or
handle the
Supervisor in any way, for the purpose of demonstration or other
training
purposes, the Supervisor should always put the student back
under his
control.
18. The Supervisor will at all times observe the Auditor's Code
during
sessions, and the Code of a Scientologist at all times.
19. The Supervisor will never give a student opinions about
Scientology
without labelling them thoroughly as such; otherwise, he is to
direct only
to tested and proven data concerning Scientology.
20. The Supervisor shall never use a student for his own personal
gain.
21. The Supervisor will be a stable terminal, point the way to
stable data, be
certain, but not dogmatic or dictatorial, toward his students.
22. The Supervisor will keep himself at all times informed of the
most recent
Scientology data and procedures, and communicate this
information to his
students.
------------
I agree to follow and obey the foregoing code.
Signed:
_________________________
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
142
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 DECEMBER AD 12
Remimeo (Reissued as amended
Tech Sec Hat 7 September 1967)
D of T Hat
Supervisor Hat
SUPERVISOR'S STABLE DATA
In addition to the Supervisor's Code (old Instructor's Code),
there is a
primary stable datum about all supervision:
Get the student to accomplish auditing the preclear and then get
the
student to accomplish it with better form, speed and accuracy.
A Supervisor must never lose sight of the PURPOSE of auditing.
Auditing is
for the preclear, is intended to improve the preclear's case. Auditing
is not
just a matter of good form.
The reason some students do not accomplish auditing is that they
become so
oriented on form alone that they forget the purpose of the form.
Good auditing form and correct sessioning obtains many times the
result of
bad form and incorrect sessioning. But total form and no effort to do
something
for the pc results in no auditing.
The result comes before the form in importance. Because students
may use
this idea to excuse lack of form, Q and A-ing, and to squirrel with
their
processes, the stable datum becomes unpopular with supervisors.
A student should first be held responsible for the state of the
pc during
and after sessions and made to know that as an auditor he is there to
get a
fast, good result. The student should then be taught that he can get a
better,
faster result with better form. After that the student should be
taught that
Scientology results are only obtained by correct and exact duplication
of
Scientology processes, not by off beat variations.
The student wants to know how to do this or that. Refer him to
his
materials on how to do the most fundamental actions, but MAKE HIM OR
HER DO IT.
And keep up a running refrain that you want results, results, results,
on his
pc.
The student will be all thumbs and faint. The Supervisor may be
horrified
by the goofs. But don't bother with the goofs. Just demand results on
the pc,
results on the pc, results on the pc.
This action by the Supervisor will teach the student (a) that he
or she is
supposed to get results in auditing and (b) that results can be
obtained and (c)
that he or she sure needs better skill.
So the first address in training is to teach those above three
things (a),
(b) and (c).
You can't teach a student who doesn't realize that results in
the pc
depend on the auditor and auditing and that results are expected from
auditing;
who believes results can't be obtained from auditing or wants to prove
auditing
doesn't work; and who doesn't yet know that he or she doesn't know.
These are
the barriers to training and a good auditor.
The gradient approach to the mind is vital. Clearing will not
occur
without it. But the gradient approach to auditing can be overdone to a
point
where the student completely loses sight of why he is auditing.
143
1. First and foremost the auditor accomplishes something for the pc
and
without that there is neither sense nor purpose to auditing;
2. Excellent form accomplishes more for the pc faster; and
3. Exact duplication of processes alone returns standard high level
results
on all pcs.
The student thrown in over his head learns:
A. Results in the pc depend on the auditor and auditing and that
results are
expected from auditing;
B. That results can be obtained in auditing and the better the form
and
duplication, the better the results and
C. That the student has more to learn about auditing and that the
student
doesn't yet know.
Therefore the Supervisor must teach the student:
(a) That he or she is supposed to get results in auditing;
(b) That Scientology can obtain results; and
(c) That better form and duplication obtain better faster results.
-----------
I dare say many students learn things just because they are told
to and
find no relationship between form, duplication and the preclear. Let
them fall
on their heads and yet obtain results and this attitude will change-
and you'll
save us a lot of off beat nonsense and case failures in orgs and the
field.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr.jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1962, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
144
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MARCH 1957
HCO London
Steves
LRH,Jr
Sue
Barrett
Marcia
Marilyn
Julia
Leigh
Ken S. STUDENT REPORTS
The routing of Student Reports is as follows:
1. Student to Instructor
2. Instructor to Director of Training
3. Director of Training to Ron
4. Ron to Central Files.
This will be followed in Washington and London alike-so that the
Student's
Report will ultimately find its way to his own folder in Central
Files. (HCO
Washington will send London Student Reports back to London for their
Central
Files.)
This will give everyone concerned a chance to see how the
student is
progressing; such information can also be useful in auditing the
student. Ron
likes to see these reports so that he can tell how the classes are
going. After
he has seen them, they will be sent to Central Files.
Mildred Deen
HCO Secretary,
Washington
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON
HCO TRAINING BULLETIN OF 17 MAY 1957
cc: Dir of Training
Dir of Processing
Comm Course Instructor
Night HCA Instructor
Org Secretary
HCO Board of Review
Registrar
PE Found Instructor
Bulletin Board
HCO London-for
distribution there
DEFINITIONS
A CONSULTANT is an instructor who is on duty sporadically or
from time to
time but not routinely in any one place.
AN INSTRUCTOR is one who has regular classes and who is assigned
to places
at specific times.
A COACH is a student who is standing in the role of "pc".
LRH:md.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
5-17-57
145
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 MAY 1957
STABLE DATA FOR INSTRUCTORS
1. Keep students busy at all times. Do not let them have
unassigned
work while at the Academy.
2. The Director of Training is not the Director of
Processing. If after
the student intensive and a week's Comm Course a student's case is not
in
condition so the student can be trained, the Director of Training or
the
Instructor should send the student to the Registrar and should not
attempt a
patch-up by another student. When the Director of Training constitutes
himself
the Director of Processing he not only denies the organization income
but most
usually continues the agony of the student and does not get training
done.
3. Answer the student's questions.
4. The stability of the Director of Training and his
Instructors
depends upon the apparency of their agreement with me on what should
be trained
and how it should be trained. When they innovate in disagreement with
organized
schedules they lower the appearance of stability and deprive
themselves usually
of the cooperation of students.
5. It is not the place of the Director of Training or an
Instructor to
defend the organization, LRH, or the past track of Dianetics and
Scientology.
Any new subject combating vested interests develops some randomity.
Rather than
defend against critical attacks by students it is much more productive
to look
over the student's case with an eye to sending him to the Registrar.
6. The Director of Training and his Instructors are there to
give
service. Service is always harder to give on an individualized basis
and easier
to give on a wide group basis. However, we are training individuals
and even
though it is difficult, service must be given.
7. On the head of the Director of Training and his
Instructors rests
any future failure the student may have in processing preclears.
Quality of
training is to the level of Staff Auditor HGC.
IF A STUDENT CANNOT BE TRUSTED UPON GRADUATION WITH AN HGC PRECLEAR,
HE SHOULD
NOT BE GRADUATED OR CERTIFIED.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:md.rd
5-24-57
146
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
HCO TRAINING BULLETIN OF 15 JULY 1957
Our first lesson in training from the 18th ACC is that the only
error a
Scientology instructor can make is in the direction of softness.
The one unit in the 3 ACC units now going through that
1. Had a student leave,
2. Didn't gain or learn
were handled by poor Sc on instructor's part.
Scientology training Stable Datum:
When in doubt, handle student with much stricter positive
placement and
direction.
LRH:md.rd
7-15-57 L. RON HUBBARD
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
BLUE ON
GOLD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W. 1
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 SEPTEMBER 1957
STABLE DATA FOR INSTRUCTORS
1. Instructors must know and use the Instructor's Code to the
letter. There
must be no violation of this Code permitted by the Dir Training.
2. Grant Beingness to the students at all times. An Instructor must
be
willing for a coach to "instruct" without resenting a "valence
theft".
3. Insist that coaches give the student auditors wins; have coaches
push the
student auditor to a better willingness and ability, and chop
bank, not
thetan.
4. Have coaches coach with precision, and have them tell the
student auditor
when he has done something well. Instruct them to tell the
student auditor
what he is doing right as well as what he is doing wrong.
5. See that the coaches coach with Purpose, Reality, Intention, and
to Win.
6. Instruct coach to maintain his control when student auditor gets
in "hot
water", adding more ARC to help him through it, while at the
same time
banging away at the same level. Make the coach who caused it
retrieve any
student who blows.
7. An Instructor's sole purpose is not to make a student blow. The
main goal
of an Instructor is to make a better auditor. This then must
apply to
coaches.
8. Always answer your students' questions as per the Instructor's
Code. An
Instructor should not withhold communication from students when
the
student needs communication.
9. Run good 8-C on students with lots of ARC. Stress good 8-C more
than ARC.
10. The most important thing an Instructor should do is to make a
good auditor
out of every student. This means making good coaches. This means
wins.
This means beingness. As ye teach 'em, so shall they audit.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:rs.rd
147
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
(Issued at Washington)
ORGANIZATION POLICY LETTER OF 25 JANUARY AD8
All Staff
Field Offices
INEPT STUDENTS
Datum: Tests of clearing through training have resulted in
the
conclusion that there is no substitute for
processing, even
training.
When a student, after a week's Comm course, shows clearly (a) he
has no
reality on Scientology or (b) he has no wish to make people better,
only worse,
the responsibility of the Comm Course Instructor and the Dir of
Training is to
send the student to HGC at his own cost for processing.
Otherwise the student will enturbulate the class and impede the
instructors and come out wrong-way to, wasting seven weeks of
inability to
learn. The faster route is auditing.
If such a thing is to be done, midway in the Comm Course it
should be
known and the Comm Course Instructor should invest the remainder of
the week in
convincing the student of the realities that could exist in
Scientology.
The student if he refuses processing is told he may continue
training but
it is doubtful if he will ever be given his certificate.
A special student rate may be arranged by Registrar at her
discretion.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:rs.rd
148
NOT HCO POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 APRIL 1958
Issued at Washington
All staff
Field Offices
ARC IN COMM COURSE
There are two types of Auditing. Both include control. They are
called
"Formal Auditing" and "Tone 40 Auditing".
The first is control by ARC. The second is control by direct
Tone 40
command.
The first, Control by ARC, is taught in Comm Course. The second,
Control
by Tone 40, is taught in Upper Indoc.
The two are never mixed in teaching. Tone 40 is never taught in
a Comm
Course and is not even permitted. ARC is not taught in Upper Indoc.
The most widespread weakness in auditors prior to this date is
an
inability to use step one of Clear Procedure (Participation by the
pc). This is
only good ARC in the Training Drills of Comm Course. Auditors are now
too prone
to let CCH Ob Help do the work. Auditors fail to make the PC feel they
are
interested in .the pc when they handle him with poor ARC.
We care nothing about ARC in Upper Indoc. We want command, we
want Tone
40. We do not even handle pc origins in Upper Indoc.
Students must understand that there are two types of auditing.
They should
realize that Tone 40 is for the unconscious, the psycho, the non-
communicative,
the electric shock case pc. The student should realize that ARC formal
auditing
is not chatty or yap-yap, but it is itself. It has warmth, humanity,
understanding and interest in it.
Academy Dir of Tr, Comm Course and Upper Indoc Instructors
should keep
this in their hats as needful technical data, since we must turn out
auditors
capable of handling pcs with ARC.
LRH:bt.rs.cden.rd LRH
Copyright ($) 1958
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
LONDON (Issued at Washington)
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1958
To: All Staff for info
ALL Instructor Hats
B. Board
Field Offices
To: All Training Activities
VITAL TRAINING DATA FOR TRAINING HATS AND REGISTRAR
Students in the Academy are auditors. They are not preclears.
Emphasis is
on auditors, not pcs.
The goal of the Academy is to produce auditors of such quality
that we
would be willing to hire them in the HGC. We don't graduate those we
wouldn't.
Training staff can refuse a student at any time on grounds of
inadequate
financial arrangements. In which event the student applicant is
returned to
Registrar.
The Academy is not a clinic and concerns about cases belong to
the HGC and
are so referred.
LRH:bt.rs.rd LRH
149
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
London (Issued at Washington DC)
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1958
1 ea. staff member
All Technical Hats
Field Offices
VITAL TRAINING DATA
(This Bulletin Changes the Character of Training)
No instructor can train a student unless he follows the
Instructor's Code.
This code is learned by heart by an instructor, not read.
Wherever we are making poor auditors, we have confused the role
of the
Academy with that of the HGC. The HGC processes, the Academy trains
only.
Tell every student, tell every class of students, tell every
instructor
many times,
THERE ARE ONLY AUDITORS AT THE ACADEMY. THERE ARE NO CASES.
Every time you as an instructor get interested in the student's
case, you
make him put up his engrams for your inspection. Every time you get
interested
in his auditing skill only you make him put up auditing skill for your
interest.
From this date:
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY AN ACADEMY TAKE UP THE PERSONAL OR
CASE
PROBLEMS OF A STUDENT.
We've got 2,500,000,000 preclears. We can somehow control
ourselves long
enough to make a few auditors.
They are made by direct, blunt instruction, the tougher the
better. They
are unmade by a lot of super saccharine sympathy about their poor,
hopeless
little cases.
So let's go, training units. No more clinics where there should
be
schools. You'll have nothing but cases forever if you don't make some
auditors!
The week's intensive formerly offered with courses is turned
over herewith
to HGCs. No further clinics as such may be run by Academies. Auditing
may occur
in Academies but there may not be preclear conferences, general or
private,
about the students' own cases. This works a hardship on HGCs to some
degree but
HGCs occasionally are victimized by having to train late students who
were not
trained but only processed through to HCA/HPA. Thus an HGC has an
interest in
training quality.
Hereinafter all processing for keeps will be done in the HGC and
all
training will be done in the Academy.
There is a standard toward which a student is trained. It
includes two
disciplines. Formal Auditing and Tone 40 Auditing. Formal is taught in
Comm
Course, Tone 40 in Upper Indoc. Students must know their codes and
must know
how to follow them-no evaluation, no invalidation.
All of Dianetics, the Anatomy branch of Scientology must be
taught.
The six simple types of processing are taught.
The axioms are taught.
Anatomy of the mind is taught, not just a lot of figure-figure
theory.
The student gets there by finding he can confront in a preclear locks,
secondaries, engrams, chains, time track, circuits, machinery,
valences, the
parts of livingness.
Manifestations of phenomena are taught, Overt-act motivator
sequences,
problems, computations, cognitions, comm lags, introversion,
extroversion,
exteriorization, A-R-C.
Scales are taught-ARC Scale, Effect Scale. The Academies must
now
undertake 3 separate courses and adhere to each.
If an instructor won't confront students he starts a big theory
course
that avoids all anatomy, takes up the personal problems of the
students, excuses
every failure to teach by saying it was student case. If case gets in
the road
send the student to the HGC to pay for auditing or not. If theory gets
in the
road of training auditors, teach anatomy only.
150
Let's go on this.
I am instructing all HCO Boards of Review to examine completely
on the
above outlined items only and to. flunk hard any student who doesn't
know his
subject. We care little for the synopses and the paper work. We want
auditors
who know their business, not a lot of squirrels.
A pc gets well in direct ratio to his ability to confront the
anatomy of
life, the anatomy of mind and the physical universe.
How do you suppose you'll ever get any auditing done if the
student can't
confront, via a pc yet, life, the anatomy of the mind and the physical
universe.
It's easier for a student to confront than a preclear to confront.
I've got a big idea for training: to wit: Let's deliver the
goods!
LRH:md.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
rs:3.10.58
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1959
HOW TO WRITE A CURRICULUM
1. Establish personality of person present. (Create their beingness
on
course.) Course creates a beingness, not imparts data.
2. Demonstrate how to Create this beingness.
3. Establish communication by teaching the language of the subject.
4. Exemplify the communication symbols with demonstrations of
ridiculous
errors.
When established teach
1. Each word and its definition that is used in the practice.
Underline
strange words.
2. Diagnosis. You must recognize ("Conditions we are seeking to
change")
i.e. Obnosis.
3. System of classification.
4. Means of Changing each class or type of child, and maintenance
of state.
Subject matter: "Prevention of worsening".
Practice
Demonstration
Doingness
Note. Person who is willing to be the person who sees.
Person who sees.
Person who discusses.
Person who can do something.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:mp.rd
151
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 NOVEMBER 1961
HCO Secs
Assoc Secs
Ds of T
TRAINING COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS
All Scientology Academies and Courses are required, forthwith,
to adopt
these rules and regulations:-
1. Do not consume any alcoholic beverage during Class days or on
the day
before a Class day.
2. Do not consume, or have administered to yourself, or any other
student,
any drugs, antibiotics, barbiturates, opiates, aspirin,
sedatives,
hypnotics or medical stimulants, for the duration of the Course,
without
the express approval of the Director of Training.
3. Do not give any processing to ANYONE without the express
permission of
the Director of Training.
4. Do not receive ANY processing from ANYONE under any
circumstances without
the express permission of the Director of Training.
5. Do not engage in any 'Self-Processing' under .any circumstances
during the
Course at any time.
6. Do not receive any 'treatment', 'guidance', or 'help' from
anyone in the
'healing arts', i.e., Physician, Dentist, etc., without the
consent of the
Director of Training.
7. Follow exactly ALL instructions given by your Instructor and the
Director
of Training.
8. Adhere completely to the Code of a Scientologist for the
duration of the
Course.
9. Follow the Auditor's Code during all sessions when being the
Auditor.
10. Be on time, and follow all Schedules exactly.
11. Get sufficient food. Eat Breakfast BEFORE Class and morning
sessions. Get
sufficient sleep.
12. When being a Preclear, be one, not a student or auditor. When
being an
Auditor, be an auditor, not a student or preclear. When in class
or
lectures, be a Student, not an auditor or preclear.
13. Get off all your known withholds. Know that you have definitely
and
absolutely NO hope of case-advancement unless you get these
known,
withholds off to your auditor.
14. Follow ALL auditing directions given you on your auditing-report
forms
for your pre clear.
15. Follow technical procedure as outlined on the Course exactly and
precisely.
16. Be honest at all times on your auditing-report forms. Stating
every
process run, Tone Arm changes and times, Sensitivity setting,
cognitions
of your preclear and any changes of physical appearance,
reactions,
communication level, or anything else that you observe in your
preclear.
17. Place all reports on your sessions as auditor in the folder of
your
preclear after each session, and place the folder then in the
basket
marked for such. Never place a folder after a session is over in
an inappropriate basket.
18. No student may read his/her own case-report folder or that of
another
student, unless he/she is auditing that student.
19. If you don't know something or are confused about course-data,
ask an
Instructor or send a despatch to the Director of Training. Do
NOT ask
other students as this creates progressively worsening errors in
data.
152
20. Do not leave any papers, food or personal articles in your
despatch
baskets. These baskets are for preclear report folders or
despatches
Only.
21. The basket marked "Student In" is the basket where all
communications,
bulletins or mail to students are placed. Always check this
basket daily
to see if you have received any communications.
22. Study and work during your class-periods. You have a lot to get
checked
out on in order, to get a Course Completion. You can't afford to
waste
time.
23. Auditors and preclears are not allowed to smoke during sessions,
at any
time. Smoke only during a break.
24. Do not engage in any rite, ceremony, practice, exercise,
meditation, diet,
food therapy, or any similar occult, mystical, religious,
naturopathic,
homeopathic or chiropractic treatment or any other healing or
mental
therapy while on Course without the express permission of the
Director of
Training.
25. Do not discuss your case-or that of. any other student-your
auditor, your
Instructors, your classmates, L. Ron Hubbard, Organisation
personnel or
the Organisation with anyone.
26. Do not engage in any sexual relationships of any nature or kind
with any
classmate who is not your legal spouse. You are here to learn
and get as
close to Clear as possible, not to run continual Present Time
Problems.
27. Weekly reports are 'required from each student; these reports
MUST be
placed in the appropriate basket each Monday morning by full-
time
students, on Monday evening by evening-course students and
Saturday
morning (for previous weekend) by weekend-students. These weekly
reports
must be written on WHITE QUARTO FLIMSY PAPER, and shall contain
approximately 250 words written under the following ' headings:
"What. I
have learned",' "What I have observed", "What I have liked
most", "What I
have disliked most", "Comments and Suggestions", "Number of
weeks on
Course" and "Instructor " Each heading to be clearly
indicated and
underlined. The report must be headed with the student's full
name-top
left corner, title of Course (e.g., Evening HPA, Unit 2,
Retread) in
centre of page, and, in the top right corner, the location E.G.,
London,
with-below this-the date as "Week-Ended " If it is not
practicable
to type this report, it must be written very legibly-in block
letters if
necessary, and if the writing is not legible it will be given
back to the
student to be re-written.
28. The above rules and regulations are inflexible, and are to be
followed by
all students during the Course. There will be no' exceptions.
29. Any, infraction against the above regulations will result in the
student
being required to write a paper of 200 words getting off his
overts and
withholds against any and all students, Instructors and
personnel
connected with the Course.
---------
N.B. Extra rules for local conditions may be added but NONE of the
above may be
deleted.
---------
Issued by: HCO Technical
Secretary WW
for
MARY SUE HUBBARD
HCO Training
Supervisor WW
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED .
153
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 DECEMBER 1961
HCO Area Secs
Org Secs
Ds of T
Instructors
CenOCon
INSTRUCTORS' WEEKLY REPORT FORM
Effective immediately, ACADEMY Instructors are required to make
a weekly
report on a form to be mimeoed in blue or black ink on white quarto
flimsy paper
as follows:
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
LONDON (or Name of your Org)
INSTRUCTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT
INSTRUCTOR FOR (e.g. UNIT 1- WEEKEND HPA) WEEK ENDING________
NUMBER OF NEW STUDENTS ON
COURSE______
NUMBER OF OLD STUDENTS ON
COURSE______
TOTAL IN
CLASS_________
NAMES OF STUDENTS: (State which are new, retread, etc)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
PROGRESS OF CLASS: (Individually-briefly-and collectively)
DATE____________ SIGNED
_____________
INSTRUCTOR
This form to be sent on the Wednesday of each week (with D of
T's and Students' reports), to HCO Technical Secretary WW at Saint Hill.
LRH:EW:imj.rd
Copyright ($) 1961 Issued by: HCO Technical
Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
154
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 DECEMBER 1961
(Amended and Reissued on 23 October 1967)
Remimeo
STUDENTS' WEEKLY REPORTS TO RON
All Scientology students are to make a weekly report (monthly
for
Foundation students) on the following form:
_______________________________________________________________________
_
TO LRH ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
(Name of Org)
STUDENT'S WEEKLY REPORT
STUDENT'S NAME____________________ WEEK ENDING__________
TITLE OF COURSE
WHAT I HAVE LEARNED
WHAT I HAVE OBSERVED'
WHAT I LIKED MOST
WHAT I DISLIKED MOST
SUGGESTIONS AND COMMENTS
LENGTH OF TIME ON COURSE
SUPERVISOR COMMENTS
These forms are to be forwarded to LRH via the International
Technical
Officer WW. They should be done on airmail paper.. Any report
illegibly written
should not be forwarded, but should be handled as a NO REPORT to
Ethics.
Org Exec Sec
WW
Mary Sue
Hubbard
LRH:jp.rd The Guardian
WW
Copyright ($) 1967 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Note: The original 8 Dec '61 issue contained a similar form and
differed only slightly in instructions for use and routing. A 23 Oct '63
issue was identical to the above. 8 Dec '61 was added to by HCO P/L 9 May
1962 on page 158, and was later amended and replaced by HCO P/L 18 March
1971, Students' Weekly Reports to Ron, in the 1971 Year Book.]
155
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 JANUARY 1962
(Reissued as amended on 21 June 1967)
Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
HCO Hats
HCO STANDING ORDER NO. 5
STUDENTS
All students formally enrolled into any Academy of Scientology
shall be
thoroughly trained.
The standard of the lowest professional certificate shall be
such as to
permit immediate and unashamed use of the student on graduation in any
Hubbard
Guidance Centre.
The only lasting overt that can be done with Scientology is to
fail to
disseminate it well and accurately. This includes student training.
Students must be trained to expect and achieve spectacular
processing
results early in training.
Students must be oriented during training into caring for the
cases of
their preclears.
In event of a poor or difficult student, it must be demanded by
Supervisors that the matter be remedied by Review or Ethics.
Students must be trained to resolve their problems with
Scientology.
Students must be trained to audit regardless of their own
restimulation or
cases. When auditing, auditors do not have cases.
Students must not be permitted to sag or slack or fall away in
attendance
and this can be done because all such attitudes result from a
student's failure
to obtain a reality early in training.
We must train new Scientologists so that we can have pride and
confidence
in them as Scientologists, not from an examination of their record but
from the
sole fact that they have been Academy trained.
Students and Supervisors alike should fully understand that
neither we nor
this universe can afford to waste even one potential auditor.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sf.jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1962, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
156
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1962
Sthil
Academies
TRAINING COURSE REGULATIONS
(ADDED)
In schoolrooms, lecture rooms or auditing rooms in any
Scientology Course
neither cigars nor pipes may be smoked. Only cigarettes of a usual
tobacco may
be smoked, and these with due regard for the possible objections of
other
students.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 APRIL 1962
CenOCon
Academies
Courses
REGULATIONS, ACADEMIES AND COURSES
Add to training regulations for all Courses,
Academies and the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
If it be discovered, by whatever means, that a student is not
studying
tapes and bulletins for examination but is studying instead only the
answers to
examination questions, however procured, then the tape and bulletin
section of
the check sheet of that student shall be destroyed and the student
shall be
required to begin the entire tape and bulletin study anew without
credit for any
he has done.
In comment, the responsibility of all instructors is to graduate
students
who have accurate knowledge of the subject. Studying examination
questions only
defeats this and will find the student some day completely adrift in
his
handling of a preclear.
The first date after which this regulation shall be in effect
shall be 20
April 1962 and only offences committed after that date shall cause
this
regulation to go into effect against a student.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
157
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 MAY 1962
Central Orgs
D of Ts
ADDITION TO STUDENTS' WEEKLY REPORT
(Adds to HCO Policy Letter of 8 December 1961,
Students' Weekly Reports)
In order for HCO WW to see the actual progress of students, the
following
is to be added to the Students' Weekly Report below the title of
INSTRUCTOR:
Check outs:__________________ Flunks: ______________
Passes:______________
LRH:jw.rd Issued by: Philip D.
Quirino
Copyright ($) 1962 Acting Tech
Sec WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON
HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 MAY 1962
Central Orgs
Academies
TAPE EXAMINATIONS
In examining students on tapes, do not demand actual wording.
Demand an
answer that clearly shows that the student has heard and understood
the tape
and can apply the knowledge.
If the student is in doubt about the answer, flunk. If the
examiner is
in doubt make the student amplify.
Asking for verbatim wording drives students to copying Tapes
verbatim
and causes them to scant understanding.
LRH:jw.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
158
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 MAY 1962
Franchise
Central Orgs
Tech Depts IMPORTANT
and on Student Board
TRAINING DRILLS
MUST BE CORRECT
TRs which give an incorrect impression of, how auditing is done
may not
be taught.
All TRs must contain the correct data of auditing.
THIS IS VITAL. There have been two broad instances where TRs
gave an
impetus to improper auditing which all but crippled the forward
advance of
Scientology.
These were:
Upper Indoc TRs which caused students to conceive that the CCHs
were run
without 2 way comm and with a militant, even vicious attitude. (See
HCO
Bulletins of April 5 and 12, 1962.)
E-Meter Needle drills which caused the student to believe that
every
action of the needle was a read and prevented three-quarters of all
Scientologists from ever getting rudiments in or questions cleared,
(see HCO
Bulletin of May 25, 1962 and 2 Saint Hill Lectures of May 24, 1962).
In the matter of the CCHs, we were deprived of their full use
for 5 years
and extended the time in processing 25 times more than should have
been consumed
for any result. This came from TRs 6-9 which are hereby scrapped.
In the matter of the E-Meter it is probable that all auditing
failures and
widely extended false ideas that Scientology did not work stem from
the improper
conception of what action of the needle one cleaned up. This came from
needle
reading TRs where instructors had students calling off every activity
of the
needle as a read, whereas Only the needle action at the exact end of
the
question was used by the auditor. Auditors have thought all needle
actions were
reads and tried to clean off all needle actions except, in some cases,
the end
actions. This defeated the meter completely and upset every case on
which it was
practiced. This accounts for all auditing failures in the past two
years.
CCHs must be taught exactly as they are used in session,
complete with two
way comm-and no comm system added, please.
E-Meter drills must be used which stress only meaningful and
significant
instant reads coming at the end of the full question.
Other actions of the needle may be shown to a student only if
they are
properly called prior and latent reads, or meaningless action. From
his earliest
training on meters the student must be trained to consider a read only
what he
would take up in session and clear or use, and must be taught that
mere actions
of the needle are neglected except in steering the pc, fishing or
compartmenting
questions.
ONLY TEACH PROPER USE. ONLY USE TRS WHICH EXACTLY PARALLEL USE
OF
SCIENTOLOGY IN SESSION AND DO NOT GIVE AN IMPRESSION THAT SOMETHING
ELSE IS
USED.
I have seen clearly that Scientology's effectiveness could be
destroyed by
teaching via TRs which can be interpreted by a student as the way to
audit when
in fact one does not audit that way or use the data in auditing.
There are many valuable TRs. There will be many more valuable
TRs. But an
invalid TR is one which gives a wrong impression of auditing. These
must be kept
out of all training.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
159
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 AUGUST 1962
CenOCon
Dir Mat
D of T URGENT
TRAINING AIDS
Due to the great success and revelatory nature of the TV
Demonstration set
up at Saint Hill, a smaller edition of this training aid is ordered
installed in
every Central Organization.
The set up consists of one TV Camera, one TV set (21 or 23
inch), a
microphone, an amplifier and the required cable.
The TV camera (such as the Grundig) is equipt with a four inch
lens. It is
mounted in a corner high and to the right behind the auditor (about
seven feet
from the floor). An E-Meter, erected on its tipped back, is placed
firmly in a
bed in the centre of a table. The face of the E-Meter is then
perpendicular to
the camera.
The Auditor sits at the table, the camera "looking over his
right
shoulder" at the E-Meter.
The preclear sits at the table across from the Auditor in the
usual
position.
The microphone is placed under the "tent" made by the E-Meter.
There is no picture made of Auditor and preclear, only a picture
of the
E-Meter.
The set up is placed in any oversize auditing room in the org
and usual
auditing can go on in that room when the set up is not in use, or it
is placed
at a separate table, otherwise unused, in the D of P's office.
The TV picture of the meter and the sound from the amplifier are
led by
cables to the front of the usual assembly hall of the organization.
The TV set is placed on a very high stand so as to give everyone
in the
room an unobstructed view of the screen.
The Sound is connected to the speakers in the set itself, there
is no
separate speaker.
This is used for demonstrations by Sthil graduates, and for
student
demonstrations to reveal to all their skill in meter reading or lack
of it in
an actual session.
No session before an audience is valid or natural and this
arrangement
gives privacy for the session but full display of the two important
points of
a session-sound and meter. It will be a shock to both Ds of P and Ds
of T to see
what is passing for meter reading, and a great help in training HGC
Auditors and
students.
The TV picture of the meter crowds in only part of the TA and
sensitivity
knob and all but a bit of the right side of the meter dial. The meter
must fill
the screen.
The cost will be under �500 or $1200. The reward in technical
cannot be
measured. A second camera and TV set which gives a side view of
auditor and pc
is nice but is optional.
Use electronic friends of the org or commercial firms to
install. But make
it a neat compact, trouble free installation with no loose wires
about.
An intercomm phone from assembly room to auditing room is nice
to have.
Do it sooner.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: This Policy Letter was reissued on 27 October 1969 with the
added
title RE-INTRODUCED FOR DIANETICS BY ORDER OF LRH.]
160
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 DECEMBER AD 12
Sthil Instructors Only
Central Orgs
HCO Sec, Assoc Sec
D of T and Instructors
INSTRUCTORS' STABLE DATA
In addition to the Instructor's Code, there is a primary stable
datum
about all instruction:
Get the Student to accomplish auditing the preclear and then get
the
student to accomplish it with better form, speed and accuracy.
An Instructor must never lose sight of the PURPOSE of auditing.
Auditing
is for the preclear, is intended to improve the preclear's case.
Auditing is not
just a matter of good form.
The reason some students do not accomplish auditing is that they
become so
oriented on form alone that they forget the purpose of the form.
Good auditing form and correct sessioning obtains many times the
result of
bad form and incorrect sessioning. But total form and no effort to do
something
for the PC results in no auditing.
The result comes before the form in importance. Because students
may use
this idea to excuse lack of form, Q and A-ing, and to squirrel with
their
processes, the stable datum becomes unpopular with instructors.
A student should first be held responsible for the state of the
pe during
and after sessions and made to know that as an auditor he is there to
get a
fast, good result. The student should then be taught that he can get a
better,
faster result with better form. After that the student should be
taught that
Scientology results are only obtained by correct and exact duplication
of
Scientology processes, not by off beat variations.
-----------
This matter comes to the fore with Routines such as 2-12, a
Problems
Intensive, Prepchecking, Routine 3-21, 3GAXX and other powerful
processes. All
these are powerhouses when done for the benefit of the preclear and
with perfect
form and duplication of data.
However, R2-12 has the peculiar ability to produce results with
the
crudest of auditing. If you find anything that reads on, a meter and
represent
it the pc feels miles better. So here is a procedure that can be done
by a very
green auditor and yet will produce an increased reality on Scientology
in the
pc. Thus the Instructor's Stable Datum above can be used with telling
effect.
HOW TO GET THE BEST OUT OF 2-12
The student is just thrown into the snake-pit. He is told to get
a result
on the pc, not look pretty. The student is only told to GET A RESULT.
There are no check sheets, pre-training, briefing, anything.
Give the
student a meter, the Bulletins, LIST ONE, a pen and paper and DEMAND A
RESULT.
A session is started by saying "Start of Session" and stopped by
saying
"End of Session". Nothing else.
The student wants to know how to do this or that. Tell him or
her briefly
and individually how to do the most fundamental actions, but MAKE HIM
OR HER DO
IT. And keep up a running refrain that you want results, results,
results, on
that pc.
The student will be all thumbs and faint. The Instructor may be
horrified
by the
161
goofs. But don't bother with the goofs. Just demand results on the pc,
results
on the pc, results on the pc.
This action by the Instructor will teach the student (a) that he
or she is
supposed to get results in auditing and (b) that results can be
obtained and (c)
that he or she sure needs better skill.
So the first address to 2-12 in training is to teach those above
three
things (a), (b) and (c).
You can't teach a student who doesn't realize that results in
the pc
depend on the auditor and auditing and that results are expected from
auditing;
who believes results can't be obtained from auditing or
Rockslammerlike wants
to prove auditing doesn't work; and who doesn't yet know that he or
she doesn't
know. These are the barriers to training and a good auditor.
The gradient approach to the mind is vital. Clearing will not
occur
without it. But the gradient approach to auditing can be overdone to a
point
where the student completely loses sight of why he is auditing.
The advent of R2-12 gives us a chance to break away from too
gentle a
gradient and pound home the simple governing principles of auditing,
and enter
into an era of training in which swift students are not retarded
unduly by slow
students and all students learn at once the most fundamental lessons
of auditing:
1. First and foremost the auditor accomplishes something for the pc
and
without that there is neither sense nor purpose to auditing;
2. Excellent form accomplishes more for the pc faster; and
3. Exact duplication of processes alone returns standard high level
results
on all pcs.
The student thrown in over his head learns:
A. Results in the pc depend on the auditor and auditing and that
results are
expected from auditing;
B. That results can be obtained in auditing and the better the form
and
duplication, the better the results; and
C. That the student has more to learn about auditing and that the
student
doesn't yet know.
Therefore the Instructor must teach the student:
(a) That he or she is supposed to get results in auditing;
(b) That Scientology can obtain results; and
(c) That better form and duplication obtain better faster results.
---------
I dare say many students learn things just because they are told
to and
find no relationship between form, duplication and the preclear. Let
them fall
on their heads and yet obtain results and this attitude will change-
and you'll
save us a lot of off beat nonsense .and case failures in orgs and the
field.
R2-12 done before it is trained makes the student aware of lots
of things
and additionally puts the student in shape to learn. The check sheet
in 2-12
comes after doing it. It will be wanted then. And in all other types
of process
it then will be possible to do the check sheet before the student does
the
process-the student will have seen the vital facts contained in (a),
(b) and (c)
for himself.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
162
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1963
Academies
Sthil Students HOW TO EXAMINE
THEORY EXAMINATIONS
The two most serious causes of students or staff failing to pass
or being
unwilling to take Bulletin Checks are:
1. RS-ing on List One; and
2. Capricious Examination
V Unit cares for the one. A study and practice of this Policy
Letter
should care for the other.
-----------
The important points of a Bulletin, Tape or Policy Letter are:
1. The specific rules, axioms, maxims or stable data;
2. The doingness details, exactly how is it done; and
3. The theory of why it is done.
All else is unnecessary. All you have to demand is the above.
They are
given in order of importance. (1) The rules, axioms, maxims or stable
data must
be known exactly verbatim and the student must be able to show their
meaning is
also known to him or her.
(2) The doingness must be exactly known as to sequence and
actions but not
verbatim (in the same words as the text).
(3) The theory must be known as a line of reasoning, reasons why
or
historical background and with accuracy, but not verbatim.
The date of the lecture or bulletin or letter is relatively
unimportant
and other details of like nature should never be asked for.
If a student or Staff Member is ever going to apply the data,
then above
(1) must be down cold, (2) must be able to be experienced and (3) must
be
appreciated.
Asking for anything else is to rebuff interest and give a
feeling of
failure to the person being examined.
An examiner should examine with fiendish exactness on (1)
alertness on (2)
and seeing if the student understands (3). An examiner should not go
beyond
these points, asking for what person was mentioned, who did the test,
what is
the copyright date, what are the first words, etc.
Graduation from courses must be speeded up. And at the same
time, the
data, the important data must be known and understood. Good, sound
examination
is the answer here. Irrelevant examination questions only slow the
student and
extend the Course.
Be as tough as you please, but only on (1), (2) and (3) above.
LRH:dr.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Revised and replaced by HCO P/L 4 March 1971 Issue II, How to do
Theory Checkouts and Examinations, in the 1971 Year Book.]
163
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 MARCH AD13
Sthil
Students
Info Central Orgs
Academies
CHECK SHEET RATING SYSTEM
A system of rating of material will hereafter be employed in all
Theory
and Practical Examinations in all Scientology training activities.
Bulletins, tapes and Drills will be assigned each one a rating
as follows:
1. STAR RATING. Passing Grade 100% on extensive verbal examination
and/or
inspection.
2. 75 RATING. Passing Grade 75% on simple written examination of
which True
and False questions can comprise 75% or more of the questions
asked.
3. ZERO RATING. Passed by proof of having read or listened to the
material
(such as notes or a general verbal statement of the subject
which assures
the Theory Examiner that the material has been covered).
STAR RATING MATERIAL
THEORY: Bulletins and tapes of material vitally necessary in
making the
currently used processes work, Auditor's Code, Axioms, etc.
PRACTICAL: TRO, 1, 2, 3, 4, Anti Q and A, Meter Reading, Session
Script,
etc.
75 RATING MATERIAL
THEORY: Basic Theory Bulletins and Tapes.
PRACTICAL: None.
ZERO RATING MATERIAL
THEORY: Texts of Scientology, background material, older
processes not
now in use, etc.
PRACTICAL: All remaining drills (passed by student on the
evidence of
another student).
It is hoped that this system will speed training and ease its
burden on
students and instructors.
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1963 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 MAY 1963
CenOCon
INSTRUCTOR HATS
Theory Examiner - Purpose: To ensure students know their
theory.
Practical Examiner - Purpose: To ensure students can apply
their
theory in a practical manner.
Auditing Supervisor - Purpose: To ensure students can audit.
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright (@) 1963 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
164
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF I8 SEPTEMBER ADI3
Central Orgs
Academies SCIENTOLOGY FIVE
SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS
The following is a guide to Scientology Instructors:
1. Scientology is a heuristic science.
2. The data has been discovered and assembled by L. Ron Hubbard.
3. The data has been amply covered and explained by L.R.H. in
lectures
and bulletins and books.
4. Training Drills have been devised and/or approved by L.R.H. and
are
more than adequate.
5. Auditing Routines, Processes and Procedures have also been
prepared
by L.R.H. and they are fully comprehensive and up-to-date.
6. The curriculum for any course has been carefully designed and/or
approved
by L.R.H.
It should therefore be apparent that it is unnecessary for an
instructor
to explain data, training drills or procedures either in long
individual talks
or in 'lectures' to groups of students.
The job of an instructor is restricted to and his efforts should
be
concentrated on checking to see that a student knows his data, can do
his TRs
and can follow auditing procedure. This is done by testing and
observation. If a
student flunks a test he is directed to study and/or practise the
material some
more. If instructor finds from observation that student does not know
his data
or is not practising it Correctly then the student is directed to
study and/or
practise accordingly. An instructor is not a coach.
Within the foregoing is the student who asks questions. This
shows he does
not know his data or training drill. The answer to the student's
question is
contained in the published data so all an instructor has to do is to
refer the
student to the book chapter, bulletin or tape that contains the data.
Instructor
should avoid giving direct answers for at least two reasons.
1. To encourage student to find out for himself.
2. To obviate the possibility of an instructor giving his
interpretation of
data which may be an alter-is of tile correct data.
Instructors should set a good example to students by handling
them with
good ARC. Emphasis should be put on the following. Tell student "You
can do it".
Don't tell them they have done wrong but point out that they haven't
properly
understood the data and direct them to the data they haven't
understood. When a
student has done a good job or is making good progress, tell him.
Don't give a
student continuous losses, try to find something, however small, that
he has
done right and point this out to him.
At all times an instructor should present an unruffled demeanour
and a
clean and tidy appearance.
An instructor maintains 8C with ARC not with the overbearing
discipline of
a sergeant-major. He calls the roll, directs students where to go and
arranges
schedules. He infracts infringement of course rules and students'
failure to
follow instructions.
Students who are constantly failing in their studies are missing
out
somewhere in their basic data so they need to be directed to study
basic
material.
Remember that you are training auditors, one day you may need
one of them
to audit you so make sure they know their data and can use it.
LRH:dr.rd Written & Issued by: Reg Sharpe
Copyright ($) 1963 Course
Secretary, SHSBC
by L. Ron Hubbard for L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 27 October 1970 Issue II, The Course Supervisor,
in the
1970 Year Book.]
165
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1963
Tech Dirs
D of Ts
Academy Instructors
Academy Students
SHSBC Instructors
SHSBC Students
URGENT
COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS
Ron wants to re-write the Rules and Regulations applicable to
Courses
throughout Scientology. The purpose of the rules and regulations is to
enable
training in Scientology to be unhindered as far as possible by the
untoward
behaviour of students and instructors and by the state of the quarters
where the
instruction takes place. He therefore requires that every Academy
Staff Member
and every student at present on Course (SHSBC included) send in
suggested rules
under the headings below so that a code of regulations can be drawn
up.
Instructors please write:
1. Rules they consider necessary for students to abide by in order
to make
instruction and admin easier.
2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by.
3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the quarters
(premises
and contents) where the Course is run.
At least three suggestions are required under each of the three
headings.
Students please write:
1. Rules they would like their fellow students to abide by.
2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by.
3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the quarters
(premises
and contents) where the Course is run.
At least twelve suggestions required under each heading.
HCO Secs are to arrange for suggestions to be written on the
reverse of
a copy of this letter by every staff member and student, and sent to
me in bulk
within seven days of receipt of this letter by the HCO Sec.
Existing rules may be used as a guide.
Issued by: Reg Sharpe
Course Secretary
SHSBC
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
166
COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS
NAME:_________________________________ DATE: ____________
State whether student or
Staff position held _______________________________
ACADEMY:_________________________
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for Students
on
Course.
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for
Instructors on
Course.
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for quarters
(premises
and contents) of' the Course.
Write legibly. If there is not enough room on this form use another
sheet of
paper with your name on it and pin it securely to this form.
167
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963
SthiI
HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC
Hat of Student Instructor Supervisor
1. To see that the Student Instructors know and carry out the
procedures in:
(a) Auditing Section
(b) Practical Section
(c) Theory Section
2. To act as terminal for the Student Instructors and should
necessity arise
re-arrange the weekly schedule.
3. To see that the Student Instructors are on post on time.
4. To see that the Student Instructors keep up their own Theory and
Practical
Check Sheets and weekly TR drills.
5. To arrange ARC break assessments and to supervise same.
Student Instructors
Auditing Section Duties
The purpose of student instructors in the Auditing Section is to
assist
the Auditing Supervisor with direct personal observation and control
of
individual auditing sessions.
In order to accomplish the above student instructors have the
following duties:
1. Know in detail all the auditing activities permitted in the
section
assigned.
2. Ensure that the sessions in the assigned unit are started and
ended on
time, are properly located and all pcs and auditors are present.
Be sure
that the auditing schedule is being followed.
3. Check all sessions to see if auditors are following the D of P
instructions in the folder and/or the correct auditing procedure
of that
unit and reporting any digression to the instructor of that
unit. The
evening student instructor may give a note to the student
auditor pointing
Out the error and must state the error on his report to the
auditing
supervisor. No other action may be taken.
4. Report Gross Auditing Errors to the instructor in charge of the
unit.
Evening instructors note them in their nightly report to the
auditing
supervisor. Gross auditing errors are:
1. Can't read meter.
2. Don't know procedure.
3. Can't complete auditing cycle.
4. Can't complete auditing cycle repetitively.
5. Doesn't pull missed W/Hs.
6. Can't handle an ARC break.
7. Can't handle a PTP or put pc into session.
8. Chronic cutting of pc's itsa line.
5. Write up informative, helpful pink sheets covering the whole
unit. Each
auditor should receive at least one pink sheet per week. Turn
completed
pink sheets over to the instructor in charge of that unit for
issuing.
168
6. Write up infractions for lateness, rule breakage, refusal to
obey
instructions, etc, and turn them over to the instructor in
charge of that
unit for issue.
7. Morning student instructors report to the instructor in charge
of that
unit immediately and evening student instructors send a daily
written
report to the Auditing Supervisor on all of the following
conditions:
1. Failure to follow auditing directions.
2. Lack of TA action.
3. No auditing being done.
4. Any session not going smoothly. (Pc flattery and ARC
breaky with
no resolution of the causes.)
5. Any suppression of data with regard to the session
activity on the
auditing report.
6. Any case that looks like blowing.
7. Any excellent auditing.
8. All student auditing enquiries are handled by saying, "Do
what you
are going to do", and write up an infraction for
unauthorised break.
The auditing section gives the students the reality that they
will get
results by first applying the basic fundamentals and then following
exact
procedure. The student auditor can do it.
The student instructor helps them by getting them to do it. Get
the
student to apply the basic fundamentals and exact procedure and they
will get
results.
Auditing
Supervisor
Procedure for Student Instructors
Theory Section
All the Theory Section student instructors are examiners. Their
job is to
make sure the student knows and understands the correct data contained
in the
theory material listed on the check sheet.
1. The first thing a new student instructor does in the Theory
Section is
study and get checked out on HCO Policy Letter of February 14,
l963-"How
to Examine, Theory Examinations", and HCO Policy Letter of March
15, AD
13-"Check Sheet Rating System".
2. The student instructor then gets a sheet of goldenrod paper, a
master
check sheet and a testing location from the Theory Supervisor.
Put your
name and the date at the top of the goldenrod paper and use it
to record
the flunks and passes for each student tested. During a lull
period in the
testing and about 10 minutes before the end of the assigned
period stop
your testing and record the flunks and passes on the Master
Roster and our
copy of the student check sheet.
3. At the time of the check out record the results on the goldenrod
sheet,
sign, date and record pass or flunk on the student's copy of the
bulletin.
Sign your full surname on both check sheets. Never use your
initials.
4. Record in the master roster in the column designated Flunk or
Pass a slash
mark for every pass or flunk a student has been given. The 5th
slash mark
is made through the previous 4 making a definite group of 5. In
the Pass
columns the 1st 10 passes go in the 1st pass column, the 2nd 10
passes in
the 2nd pass column, etc.
5. Never leave the Theory Section until all passes and flunks are
fully
recorded on the master roster and our copies of the student's
check sheet,
the master roster and check sheet binder is never to be touched
unless you
are on duty as a student instructor. No check outs are to be
given except
when you are on duty as a student instructor.
6. When a student passes a bulletin say "Pass". When a student
flunks a
bulletin say "Flunk".
7. If you ask a general question, be willing to get a general
answer. If you
want a specific answer, ask for it specifically.
169
8. Only ask enough questions to be certain that the student knows
the correct
data contained on the bulletin. This may be as few as one
question or as
many as 50.
9. An examiner's job is to determine whether the student knows the
data or
not. If the student does, he passes. If the student doesn't, he
flunks.
10. Ask direct, straight-forward questions, and keep accurate up-to-
date
records, and the students will work hard and continue winning
with their
theory.
Theory Section
Supervisor
Practical
A Student Instructor:
1. Calls roll promptly at 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm each day and at 4.55 pm
on
Mondays. A "That's it" is given at 2.50 pm and 4.45 pm each day
and at 6.0
pm on Mondays.
2. Reports any student not present at roll call to the Training
Office if
the Practical Supervisor is not present. The student must be
found.
3. Sees that students are paired up immediately after roll call. If
one
student is left over it must be reported at once to the
Practical
Supervisor or to the Training Office. Another student must then
be sent
over from Theory or that student goes to Theory and comes over
the next
period.
4. Infractions. See Auditing Section Infractions.
5. Files all new pink sheets in the green folders. Files all
completed pink
sheets in green folders and puts an X through the carbon
duplicates
already in the green folders. These are then put in the
Practical
Supervisor's top basket. This is done every day immediately
after No.
3 has been done.
6. On Monday, student instructor chooses two chair monitors, whose
duties
are to place in Chapel at 4.45 pm on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and
Thursdays,
approximately 9 chairs in 9 rows leaving a gangway down the
middle, 4
chairs on the left, 5 chairs on the right (looking downwards
towards the
blackboard). If television, the chairs are placed accordingly.
7. At the beginning of each period, goes round to each couple and
marks in
any check outs the student has completed since the last
practical period.
8. Knows exactly how each drill is run, and when not checking a
student out,
is constantly moving from couple to couple seeing that the
drills are
being run properly and correcting any errors.
Practical
Supervisor
Authorized by: L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
170
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1963
Sthil
TRAINING TECHNOLOGY
PINK SHEETS
All the study in the world isn't going to make an auditor.
Learning the
data and the theory of auditing is vitally important. Perfecting your
practical
drills is essential. However, the final test lies with the question,
"Are you
getting results with your Pc?" Whether you are getting results or not
is totally
dependent on whether or not you are actually applying the data and
theory you
have learned, and are utilizing the practical skills you have
developed.
The bridge between the learning of data and development of
practical
skills and their actual application in the auditing session can be
mightily
bolstered by the Pink Sheet system of Auditing Supervision.
HOW TO ISSUE PINK SHEETS
1. Put two sheets of pink foolscap size paper on a clipboard with a
carbon
between.
2. At the top of the sheet write the name of the student auditor
being
observed, the date and the name of the observer.
3. Head a wide column on the right hand side of the sheet with
"Observations", a narrow column to the left of centre with
"Theory and
Practical Assignment" and two more narrow columns on the left
hand side
with "Coach" and "Instructor".
4. Take the above with your ball point into the vicinity of the
auditing
session to be observed, close enough to hear and see what is
going on
without intruding in the session.
5. Write in the wide column labelled "Observations" exactly what is
happening
in the session.
This is very difficult to do for most people, (especially for
someone at
the case level of "only able to confront own evaluations"). Do
not look
for auditing errors. Just look and record what is happening. Do
not write
in evaluation. Do not write in invalidations. Do not attempt to
correct or
teach in the "Observations" columns. Simply observe the session
and record
what is happening.
6. After you have filled one or more pages of the "Observations"
column, now
is the time to evaluate. Study what you have observed taking
place in the
session and see if anything actually diverges from the correct
theory and
practice of auditing.
7. Write in the column headed "Theory and Practical Assignment" the
date and
title of the exact bulletin or tape containing the correct data
or the
title of the exact practical drill which will correct the error
recorded
in the "Observations" column.
If the session observed was a complete shambles, it means that
some basic,
basic fundamental of auditing is absent in the student auditor's
repertory. Don't overload the student with tons of drills and
theory
assignments. Look over your "Observations" column carefully and
it will
suddenly dawn on you that this student hasn't a clue about the
auditing
cycle or doesn't note the difference between the needle and the
TA on the
meter. If you still can't find the main difficulty, you can
always sit the
student down and ask something like "What happens when you sit
down in
front of a PC?", or "What's the meter for?" You'll. be surprised
with some
of the answers you'll get.
171
On the other hand you might find that you'll fill up a couple of
pages of
pink sheet without recording any errors. The auditor didn't
happen to
goof. That's fine-send it to him without any assignment. It will
still
help him.
8. Send the top copy of the Pink Sheet to the student and file the
carbon
copy in the student's Pink Sheet folder. When the completed top
copy is
returned by the student, with all the necessary signatures,
throw away the
carbon copy and replace it with the completed top copy.
PINK SHEET EXAMPLES
1. The following would be a poor Pink Sheet:
Theory & Practical Assignments: | Observations:
TRO | Poor TRO
Meter Reading | Auditor can't read the
meter
Tape of Sep 18 '62 Aud Cycle | Lousy handling of
auditing cycle
In the above example the observer has evaluated, invalidated,
only made
general comments. The above may all be true but the student auditor is
not
helped by them, and the assignments don't pinpoint his major
difficulty.
2. The following would be a helpful pink sheet:
Theory & Practical Assignments: | Observations:
| Auditor leaning on
table toying
| with the TA and pen.
Running
| "Since the last time I
audited
| you" + buttons. Called
a
TR-3 | speeded rise on
"Careful of"
| clean. On Tape of Sep
18 '62 "F
| to R" pc said "I don't
think
| that answered the
question".
| Aud: "OK. I'll check
it on the
Aud Cycle | meter". TA blew down
to clear
| read on "F to R". Aud
went on
| to clean "Invalidate".
In the above example the observer states exactly what is
happening in the
auditing session. The majority of observations noted show an inability
to
complete an Auditing Cycle. (Even the Missed Meter read was an
incomplete
cycle.) The student is therefore assigned material that will help him
learn and
apply the auditing cycle. There may be other things that can help him
like TR-0
or Meter Drills. However adding these to the Pink Sheet will only
disperse his
attention which should be applied to learning and using the Auditing
Cycle.
COACHING PINK SHEETS
Pink Sheets should be coached in both Practical and Theory. The
coach
first 'reviews the observations thoroughly with the student and goes
over and
over the bulletin or drill with the student until the correct data is
completely
learned and understood or until the student can perfectly execute the
drill.
Once this is done, the coach signs his name opposite the
assignment
notation on the Pink Sheet in the coach's column. The student is then
ready to
have a test on the assigned material.
CHECKING OUT PINK SHEETS
In checking out the assigned material on the student's Pink
Sheet, the
instructor should carefully go over the "Observations" with the
student and have
the student spot the specific errors he has made, then have the
student give the
correct data from the assigned bulletin or tape or show by doing the
practical
drill that he has now mastered the skill that was poorly applied in
the auditing
session.
172
The whole bulletin or drill should be reviewed by the instructor
but
specific attention should be paid to points that the student was
observed to be
weak in applying to his auditing. Be doubly strict on these points to
be sure
the student doesn't continue to make the same errors again and again..
If each
Pink Sheet thoroughly corrects only one gross auditing error, really
knocks it
out, the student's auditing ability will improve markedly in a very
short time.
CONCLUSIONS
Pink Sheets are never used as punishment or to make the student
wrong.
They are used to improve the student's auditing ability by having him
thoroughly
learn data and practical skills he is weak in.
A student's weakness in data and skills often will not show up
under the
normal conditions of theory and practical testing but they will stick
out like a
sore thumb when he has to apply them in an actual auditing session.
Therefore, a
Pink Sheet Assignment does not mean that the student hasn't learned
the material
if he has already passed it in Theory or Practical. It does mean that
he hasn't
learned it WELL ENOUGH to utilize it under the duress of an actual
auditing
session.
If a student has gone a whole week without receiving a Pink
Sheet, he
should start screaming. If his auditing is not being observed and his
weak
points picked up, how does he expect to improve? So, make a fuss,
Student, if
you are not receiving Pink Sheets. And, Instructors, keep a tabulation
of when a
student is issued a Pink Sheet so that you are sure to observe each
student at
least once a week.
Issued by: Fred Hare
LRH:jw.aap Auditing
Supervisor SHSBC
Copyright ($) 1963 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
[Amended by HCO P/L 20 December 1970 (reissued & corrected 26 January
1971), Pink Sheets, which was later cancelled by a 9 January 1973 revision
of the above policy, HCO P/L 27 September 1963R, Training Technology-Pink
Sheets, in the Year Books.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 OCTOBER 1963
Central Orgs
Academies
STUDENT ARC BREAKS
Just as a pc cannot be audited over a severe ARC break, so a
student
cannot make good progress if he or she has an ARC break with the
Course and/or.
Instructors.
All students should be made aware of this and told that if they
have an
ARC break they should take it up with the instructors in question or
the D of T
or (in the case of SHSBC) the Course Secretary.
The Instructor, D of T or Course Secretary should try to clear
the break
with straightforward two-way comm and if this does not work the
Student should
be given an ARC break assessment by a senior student.
It is the responsibility of all Students and Instructors to see
that any
Student who is nursing an ARC break and not doing anything about it,
is handled
as above-.quickly.
Issued by: Reg Sharpe
LRH:dr.rd Course Secretary
SHSBC
Copyright ($) 1963 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
173
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 APRIL 1964
All Course Staffs (Reissued as amended on 23 June 1967)
Qual Secs Hats
Ds of T Hats
Academy Staff Hats SCIENTOLOGY COURSES
There are three zones of responsibility in course management.
These are:
1. Providing valuable subject materials;
2. Organizing and codifying those materials so that they are
highly
effective and comprehensible; and
3. Supervising the student in those materials to a point of
high
comprehension and competency.
In Scientology (1) has been done, fully and completely. There
are now no
gaps or unanswered questions.
In (2) the very best of Scientology has been selected out for
supervision
and is being written in such a way as to minimize any confusion and
maximize the
communication and practice of the data.
In (3) we have our largest potential randomity. And it is this
with which
this Policy Letter is concerned. The Supervision of the student is a
personalized matter. Students require answers to their own questions
and
clarification of their own understandings. The burden of this falls on
the
Supervisor.
In auditing it has taken us a long time to learn that there are
no bad
preclears. There are only auditor errors.
We have now learned a similar thing about Supervising. There are
no slow
students. There are only slow Supervisors.
The length of time a student is on a course is a direct index of
the
quality of Supervision on that course.
A fast course is well supervised. A slow course is poorly
supervised.
A bad course gets bad enrolments. A good course gets good
enrolments. If
enrolment is down, the course is a poor course. That has been observed
continually in Academies for years and has no variations. If you want
a full
course, provide a well-supervised course.
If course enrolments are down, don't ponder beyond this how to
improve the
course. And you'll win if you improve the course.
This is a brick wall datum: a poor course will become an empty
course.
The speed with which a student can go through a course depends
only on
(1), (2) and particularly (3) above. It does not depend on the
student.
Don't blame students. Look at (1), (2) and (3) above.
There are no slow students. There is only slow supervision.
-----------
The future of Scientology courses depends on getting the student
rapidly through the course and graduating him or her at a good level of
competence.
174
Scientology course futures do not depend on lowered rates.
You are already selling pearls for pennies.
Just make sure you are selling pearls.
I have taken care of (1). (2) is very thoroughly in hand. (3) is
up to
you.
A fast course is a well supervised course. A full course is a
well
supervised, fast course.
That's all the mystery there is in it.
LRH:jw.jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1964, 1967 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: 23 June 1967 differs from the original 10 April 1964 in that
"Instructing" has been changed to "Supervising" throughout.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 MAY 1964
Sthil Students
CenOCon
Academies THEORY TESTING
EXPIRATION DATES
(Applies to all Bulletin, tape exams
except zero rating)
In theory testing. the slow down comes in part from making the
student
pass a test on the entire bulletin even though he or she did not flunk
until the
last paragraph. Retesting the entire bulletin is both time-wasting and
exasperating.
Therefore bulletin and tape tests are given an Expiration Date.
If retaken
in one week, the only part examined is from the area flunked onward.
If,
however, the bulletin or tape is retaken after a period of one week
the entire
material is retested.
The Examiner, when a student flunks, marks the student's
bulletin or tape
notes with an initial and a date just above the area of the first
flunk. The
Examiner may go a question or two above the question flunked to enter
the date
and initial. No other record is made.
If the student is re-examined on a date before the date marked
plus seven
(within one week) the Examiner only asks questions from the date mark
onward.
It does not matter how many flunks are given or how many weeks a
bulletin
or tape exam is extended so long as no period of seven days elapses
between
tests. If such a period does elapse (date written + 7 days) only then
does the
whole material get examined.
The reason for this Expiration Date is this: students are often
very poor
administrators. They take a bulletin or tape, study it and flunk it,
throw it
aside and take up another one. Finally they have gone through all the
course
materials in this fashion and have nothing on their check sheets and
nothing but
failure in their studies. By introducing the Expiration Date they are
persuaded
to complete that which they begin.
As students have to go to the end of the examination line,
popping back in
for the next bit a minute later is unworkable. Further an Examiner
seeing that a
student is trying to pass an examination with one question passed at a
time can
always exercise his right to assure himself the student knows the
materials by a
spot examination of the whole bulletin or tape before granting a pass.
LRH:jw.cden.rd
Copyright ($) 1964 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
175
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1964
(Reissued on 21 July 1967)
Remimeo
Franchise
All Students
Tech Divs
Dist Divs
UNDERSTANDING AND TAPE LECTURES
When tapes are played to students (either in groups or
individually) the
students should be told to make notes of any word or phrase they do
not
understand so that they can refer to the Scientology dictionary, a
general
dictionary, or their technical materials for explanation.
The Supervisor should give a brief explanation if the word or
phrase is at
a higher level of training than the student is learning or refer
student to the
detailed definition to be found in publications if it is at the same
or lower
level.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jw.jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1964, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: In the 21 July 1967 reissue, "Instructor" has been changed to
"Supervisor". The original issue referred the student to the Instructor
for an explanation instead of to the materials.]
176
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1964
Remmeo
Sthil Instructors INSTRUCTION & EXAMINATION:
all Acad Instructors RAISING THE STANDARD OF
The basic reason students remain long on courses stems from
inept
criticism by instructors regarding what is required.
There is a technology of criticism of art, expressed beautifully
in the
Encyclopaedia published by Focal Press.
In this article it stresses that a critic who is also an expert
artist
tends to introduce unfairly his own perfectionism (and bias and
frustrations)
into his criticism.
We suffer amazingly from this in all our courses. I had not
previously
spotted it because I don't demand a student at lower levels produce
results
found only in higher levels.
You can carelessly sum this up by "letting the student have
wins" but if
you do you'll miss the whole point.
Example: A student up for a pass on his Itsa is flunked because
he or she
couldn't acknowledge.
But a student at the Itsa level hasn't been taught to
acknowledge.
This student hasn't even read the data on acknowledgement.
So the student can't pass Itsa level and so never does get to
the level
where acknowledgement is taught-and if he does, really never passed,
in his own
mind, Itsa and so hasn't advanced.
And we catch all our students this way and they don't therefore
learn.
How is this done? How could this be?
The instructor is an expert auditor. That's as it should be. But
as an
expert auditor, bad execution of a level above where the student is
studying,
pains the instructor. So he flunks the student because the auditing
looks bad.
But look here. The student wasn't being checked out as an
auditor. The
student was only being checked out on Itsa.
Further, the action of auditing as a whole is so easy to an
instructor who
is an expert auditor that he fails to take it apart for instruction.
If I say the following, it will look ridiculous and you'll get
the point
better: The student is up to pass TRO. The Instructor on check
outlooks the
student over and says "You flunked the test." The student says "Why?"
The
Instructor says "You didn't take the Class VI actions to clear the pc
of all his
GPMs." All right,, we can all see that that would be silly. But
Instructors do
just that daily, though on a narrower band.
The Instructor puts in additives. As an expert auditor it seems
natural to
him to say "You flunked your test on Itsa because you never
acknowledged the
pc." You get the point. This really is as crazy wide as the ridiculous
example
above. What does Ack have to do with Itsa? Nothing!
Because the Instructor is an expert auditor, auditing has ceased
to have
parts and is all one chunk. Okay. A good auditor regards it that way.
But the
poor student can't grasp any of the pieces because the whole chunk is
being
demanded.
What's Itsa? It's Listen. Can the student listen? Okay, he can
listen but
the expert says, "He didn't get 15 divisions of TA per hour." On the
what? "On
the meter of course." What meter? That's Level II and Itsa is Level 0.
"Yes," the expert protests, "but the pc didn't get any better!" Okay,
so what pc
is supposed to get better at Level 0. If they do it's an accident,
usually. Now
does this student pass? "No! He can't even look at the pc!" Well,
that's TRO of
Level I. "But he's got to look like an auditor!" How can he? An
auditor has to
get through a comm course before you can really call
177
him that. "Okay, I'll drop my standards " the expert begins. Hell
no,
expert. You better pick up your standards for each Level and for each
small part
of auditing.
What's it say at Level 0? "It says 'Listen'." Okay, then, damn
it, when
the student is able to sit and listen and not shut a pe down with yak,
the
student passes. "And the meter?" You better not let me catch you
teaching meters
at Level 0.
And so it goes right on up through the Levels and the bits
within the
Levels.
By making Itsa mysterious and tough, by adding big new standards
to it
like TA and Ack you only succeed in never teaching the student Itsa!
So he goes
on up and at Level IV audits like a bum. Can't control a pc. Can't
meter,
nothing.
So the expert tries to make a student do Class VI auditing the
first day
and the student is never trained to do any auditing at Level 0.
This nonsense repeated at Level I (by adding a meter, by purist
flunking
"because the pc couldn't handle an ARC Break") and repeated again at
Level II
("because the pc couldn't assess") and at Level III etc. etc.
Well, if you add things all the time out of sequence and demand
things the
student has not yet reached the .student winds up in a ball of
confusion like
the cat getting into the yarn.
So we're not instructing. We're preventing a clear view of the
parts of
auditing by adding higher level standards and actions to lower level
activities.
This consumes time. It makes a mess.
The new HCA always tries to teach his group a whole HCA course
his first
evening home. Well, that's no reason seasoned veterans have to do it
in our
courses.
If you never let a student learn Level 0 because he's flunked
unless he'
does Level VI first, people will stay on courses forever and we'll
have no
auditors.
Instructors must teach not out of their own expertise but Out of
the text
book expected actions in the Level the student is being trained in. To
go above
that level like assessment in Level II or Ack and meters at Level 0 is
to deny
the student any clean view of what he's expected to do. And if he
never learns
the parts, he'll never do the whole.
And that's all that's wrong with our instruction or our
instructors. As
expert auditors they cease to view the part the student must know as
itself and
do not train and pass the student upon it.
Instead they. confuse the student by demanding more than the
part being
learned.
Instruction is done on a gradient scale. Learn each part well by
itself.
And only then can assembly of parts occur into what we want-a well
trained
student.
This is not lowering any standards. It's raising them on all
training.
Bulletin Check Outs
The other side of the picture, theory, suffers because of a
habit. The
habit is all 'one's years of formal schooling where this mistake is
the whole
way of life.
If the student knows the words, the theory instructor assumes he
knows the
tune.
It will never do a student any good at all to know some facts.
The student
is expected only to use facts.
It is so easy to confront thought and so hard to confront action
that the
Instructor often complacently lets the student mouth words ideas that
mean
nothing to the student.
ALL THEORY CHECK OUTS MUST CONSULT THE STUDENT'S UNDER STANDING.
If they don't, they're useless and will ARC Break the student
eventually.
Course natter stems entirely from the students' non-
comprehension of words
and data.
178
While this can be cured by auditing, why audit it all the time
when you
can prevent it in the first place by adequate theory check-out? . .
There are two phenomena here.
First Phenomenon
When a student misses understanding a word, the section right
after that
word is a blank in his memory. You can always trace back to the word
just before
the blank, get'. it understood and find miraculously that the former
blank area
is not now blank in the bulletin. The above is pure magic.
Second Phenomenon
The second phenomenon is the overt cycle which follows a
misunderstood
word. When a word is not grasped, the student then goes into a non-
comprehension
(blankness) of things immediately after. This is followed by the
student's
solution for the blank condition which is to individuate from it-
separate self
from it. Now being something else than the blank area, the student
commits
overts against the more general area. These overts, of course, are
followed by
restraining himself from committing overts. This pulls' flows toward
the person
and makes the person crave motivators. This is followed by various
mental and
physical conditions and by various complaints, fault-finding and look-
what-you-
did-to-me. This justifies a departure, a blow.
But the system of education, frowning on blows as it does,
causes the
student to really withdraw self from the study subject (whatever he
was
studying) and set up in its place a circuit which can receive and give
back
sentences and phrases.
We now have "the quick student who somehow never applies what he
learns".
The specific phenomena then is that a student can study some
words and
give them back and yet be no participant to the action. The student
gets A+ on
exams but can't apply the data.
The thoroughly dull student is just stuck in the non-comprehend
blankness
following some misunderstood word.
The "very bright" student who yet can't use the data isn't there
at all.
He has long since ceased to confront the subject matter or the
subject.
The cure for either of these conditions of "bright non-
comprehension" or
"dull" is to find the missing word.
But these conditions can be prevented by not letting the student
go beyond
the missed word without grasping its meaning. And that is the duty of
the Theory
Instructor.
Demonstration
Giving a bulletin or tape check by seeing if it can be quoted or
paraphrased proves exactly nothing. This will not guarantee that the
student
knows the data or can use or apply it nor even guarantees that the
student is
there. Neither the "bright" student nor the "dull" student (both
suffering from
the same malady) will benefit from such an examination.
So examining by seeing if somebody "knows" the text and can
quote or
paraphrase it is completely false and must not be done.
Correct examination is done only by making the person being
tested answer
(a) The meanings of the words (re-defining the words used in
his own
words and demonstrating their use in his own made up
sentences), and
(b) Demonstrating how the data is used.
The examiner need not do a Clay Table audit just to get a
student to pass.
But the examiner can ask what the words mean. And the examiner can ask
for
examples of action or application.
"What is this HCO Bulletin's first section?" is about as dull as
one can
get. "What are the rules given about ?" is a question I would
never bother
to ask. Neither of
179
these tell the examiner whether he has the bright non-applier or the
dull
student before him. Such questions just beg for flatter and course
blows.
I would go over the first paragraph of any material I was
examining a
student on and pick out some uncommon words. I'd ask the student to
define each
and 'demonstrate its use in a made up sentence and flunk the first
"Well
er.... let me see " and that would be the end of that check out. I
wouldn't
pick out only Scientologese. I'd pick out words that weren't too
ordinary such
as "benefit" "permissive" "calculated" as well as "engram".
Students I was personally examining would begin to get a hunted
look and
carry dictionaries-BUT THEY WOULDN'T BEGIN TO NATTER OR GET SICK OR
BLOW. AND
THEY'D USE WHAT THEY LEARNED.
Above all, I myself would be sure I knew what the words meant
before I
started to examine.
Dealing with' new technology and the necessity to have things
named, we
especially need to be alert.
Before you curse our terms, remember that a lack of terms to
describe
phenomena can be twice as incomprehensible as having involved terms
that at
least can be understood eventually.
We do awfully well, really, better than any other science or
subject. We
lack a dictionary but we can remedy that.
But to continue with how one should examine, when the student
had the
words, I'd demand the music. What tune do these words play?
I'd say "All right, what use is this bulletin (or tape) to you?"
Questions
like, "Now this rule here about not letting pcs eat candy while being
audited,
how come there'd be such a rule?" And if the student couldn't imagine
why, I'd
go back to the words just ahead of that rule and find the one he
hadn't grasped.
I'd ask "What are the commands of 8C?". And when the student
gave them,
I'd still have the task of satisfying myself that the student
understood why
those were the commands. I'd ask "How come?" after he'd given me the
commands.
Or "What are you going to do with these?" "Audit a pc with them" he
might say.
I'd say, "Well, why these commands?"
But if the student wasn't up to the point of study where knowing
why he
used those commands was not part of his materials, I wouldn't ask. For
all the
data about not examining above level applies very severely to Theory
Check out
as well as to Practical and general Instruction.
I might also have a Clay Table beside my examiner's desk (and
certainly
would have if I were an HCO hat checker, to which all this data also
applies)
and use it to have' students show me they knew the words and ideas.
Theory often says "Well, they take care of all that in
Practical." Oh no
they don't. When you have a Theory Section that believes that,
Practical can't
function at all.
Practical goes through the simple motions. Theory covers why one
goes
through the motions.
I don't think I have to beat this to death for you.
You've got it.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Modified by HCO P/L 4 October 1964 (reissued 21 May 1967), Theory
Check-out Data, page 181.]
180
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 OCTOBER 1964
Remimeo Reissued on 21 May 1967
All Staff
All Students
Tech Hats
Qual Hats THEORY CHECK-OUT DATA
(Modifies HCO Pol Ltr of Sept 24, '64)
In checking out technical materials on students or staff, it has
been
found that the new system as per HCO Pol Ltr of Sept 24, '64 is too
lengthy if
the whole bulletin is covered.
Therefore the system given in Sept 24, '64 Pol Ltr is to be used
as
follows:
1. Do not use the old method of covering each bit combined with the
new
method.
2. Use only the new method.
3. Spot check the words and materials, do not try to cover it all.
This is
done the same way a final examination is given in schools: only
a part of
the material is covered by examination, assuming that if the
student has
this right the 'student knows all of it.
4. Flunk on comm lag in attempts to answer. If the student
"er....ah...
flunk it as' it certainly isn't known well enough to use.
(Doesn't include
stammerers.)
5. Never keep on examining a bulletin after a ,student has missed.
6. Consider all materials star rated or not rated. Skip 75%'s. In
other
words, the check-out must have been 100% right answers for a
pass. 75% is
not a pass. When you consider a bulletin or tape too unimportant
for a
100% pass, just require evidence that it has been read and don't
examine
it at all. In other words, on those you check out, require 100%
and on
less important material don't examine, merely require evidence
of having
read.
THE "BRIGHT" ONES
You will find that often you have very glib students you won't
be able to
find any fault in who yet won't be able to apply or use the data they
are
passing. This student is discussed as the "bright student" in the Sept
24, '64
Pol Ltr.
Demonstration is the key here. The moment you ask this type of
student to
demonstrate a rule or theory with his hands or the paper clips on your
desk this
glibness will shatter.
The reason for this is that in memorizing words or ideas, the
student can
still hold the position that it has nothing to do with him or her. It
is a total
circuit action. Therefore, very glib. The moment you say "Demonstrate"
that word
or idea or principle, the student has to have something to do with it.
And
shatters.
One student passed "Itsa" in theory with flying colours every
time even on
cross-check type questions, yet had never been known to listen. When
the theory
instructor said, "Demonstrate what a student would have to do to pass
Itsa," the
whole subject blew up. "There's too many ways to do Itsa auditing!"
the student
said. Yet on the bulletin it merely said "Listen". That given as a
glib answer
was all right. But "demonstration" brought to light that this student
hadn't a
clue about listening to a pc. If he had to demonstrate it, the non-
participation
of the student in the material he was studying came to light.
Don't get the idea that Demonstration is a Practical Section
action.
Practical gives the drills. These demonstrations in Theory aren't
drills.
Clay Table isn't used to any extent by a Theory Examiner. Hands,
a
diagram, paper clips, these are usually quite enough!
181
COACHING IN THEORY
There is Theory Coaching as well as Practical Coaching.
Coaching Theory means getting a student to define all the words,
give all
the rules, demonstrate things in the bulletin with his hands or bits
of things,
and also may include doing Clay Table Definitions of Scientology
terms.
That's all Theory Coaching. It compares to coaching on drills in
Practical. But it is done on Bulletins, tapes and policy letters which
are to be
examined in the future. Coaching is not examining. The examiner who
coaches
instead of examining will stall the progress of the whole class.
The usual Supervisor action would be to have any student who is
having any
trouble or is slow or glib team up with another student of comparable
difficulties and have them turn about with each other with Theory
Coaching,
similar to Practical coaching in drills.
Then when they have a bulletin, tape or policy letter coached,
they have a
check-out. The check-out is a spot check-out as above, a few
definitions or
rules and some demonstration of them.
DICTIONARIES
Dictionaries should be available to students in Theory and
should be used
in Theory Examination as well, preferably the same publication.
Dictionaries
don't always agree with each other.
No Supervisor should try to define English language words out of
his own
head when correcting a student as it leads to too many arguments. On
English
words, open a dictionary.
A Scientology dictionary is available.
---------
Remember that with Courses becoming briefer in duration, the
number of
bulletins and tapes which the student must know on a Star-Rated basis
is also
less.
General written examination for classification, however, remains
on an
85% pass basis.
---------
Be sure that students who get low marks constantly are also
handled in
Review, preferably by definitions of words they haven't understood in
some
former subject. Scientology is never the cause of consistent dullness
or
glibness.
Processing of this nature can be on an Itsa basis. It does not
have to be
Clay Table. Just finding the prior subject by discussion and
discussing its
words usually blows the condition. I've seen it change the whole
attitude of a
person in just 5 or 10 minutes of auditing on a "locate the subject
and word"
basis.
Therefore, definitions exist at Levels 0 and I, but not with
Clay Table or
assessment, only by Itsa. You'd be surprised how well it works and how
fast.
"Subjects you didn't like", "words you haven't grasped" are the
discussion
question.
---------
The subject of "wrong definitions cause stupidity or circuits,
followed by
overts and motivators", is not easy to get across because it is so
general
amongst Mankind. There is a possibility that past lives themselves are
wiped out
by changing language, whether it is the same language that changes
through the
years or shifting nationality. But however that may be, don't be
discouraged at
the difficulties you may have in getting this principle understood and
used in
Scientology departments-the person you are trying to convince has
definitions
out somewhere also!
LRH:jw.jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
182
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 FEBRUARY 1965
Sthil Instructors
Sthil Students
COURSE CHECK OUTS
TWIN-CHECKING
Hereafter the existing theory coaching policy of 1964 will be
amplified
as follows:
Students, being formed into coaudit teams, turnabout, will also
do their
theory check outs in pairs.
An Instructor, in doing a theory check out will have both
students, that
are listed as Coauditors in the Auditing Assignment Sheet, appear
before him
when either one requires a check out and will then check out both
students on
the same bulletin.
The Instructor will ask the students alternately his questions
and if
either student flunks, both flunk the test. This system is called Twin
Checking.
It is extremely important that the flunk be given quickly by the
Instructor after a short Comm lag on the student's part. No coaxing by
the
Instructor is permitted. Reason? If the Instructor lets one of the two
students
flounder about, the other student will try to prompt and, at the very
least, the
other student is put on a withhold of the data his twin cannot answer
and he
can. Therefore the system will prove unworkable if the flunk is not
given
quickly after the er-ah-hm of one student indicates he doesn't know.
On being flunked, the students should then retire to their
places in the
classroom and coach each other, as covered in 1964 Policy Letters,
until they
feel they can pass.
They will be examined from just above the point of the flunk if
done
within a' week. However, in case the team has been split up, all such
partial
pass notes on the' materials of both expire. This is easy to detect
without any
admin overload, as both their mimeos will have the Instructor's
initials at the
same spot with the same date. When dates don't compare, it is a matter
for
single examination.
Single student exam in theory takes place whenever one student
already has
a pass (as from a former period or team) and the other doesn't.
However, single passing done because the student's twin is sick
or has
blown will work the evil of paying a student to ARC break in auditing
his slower
twin so as to get single passing going rather than be forced to coach
or audit
the other to make the slower one quicker. Therefore, students whose
mate has
blown or has become ill just aren't single checked. Checkouts on
Theory await
the return of the other. Also one mustn't be quick to re-assign a
broken up
coaudit team. And one changes teams only when the student goes up to
the next
unit when it would be a good thing to re-shuffle anyway.
Single student examination cannot be done when only one student
has a partial' pass and the other doesn't.
In making partial passes, the Instructor always marks both the
students'
mimeos. And in starting from a point again, checks both the students'
materials
to see if the partial pass dates and initials agree. If they don't, he
dismisses
one, of the students back to study and examines the other and gives
both a pink
sheet for making the error.
The Twin Checking system presupposes students coaudit in pairs.
Practical coaching should never be by the pair who' are assigned
coauditors'. Otherwise the check out system is the same as for theory.
Practical check outs will also be done in pairs and Twin
Checking used.
This means practical coaching teams must remain stably assigned as
different
from auditing assignments.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED'
183
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MARCH AD1S
Remimeo (Reissued on 13 September 1967)
Academies Students
Saint Hill Courses
Tech Sec's Hat
Qual Sec's Hat
Dir of Exams' Hat
Student Examiner's Hat
Dir of Review Hat
Cramming Officer's Hat TRAINING DEPT - DIV IV
Supervisor's Hat DEPT OF EXAMS - DIV V
All student examiners are to be star checked on this.
FURTHER MATERIAL ON STUDY - EXAMINATIONS
Progress in study can be inhibited through the usage of a poor
system of
examination. By asking of questions irrelevant to the material covered
and by
failing to ensure that the student is fully aware of exactly what
question is
flunked, the student can be given sufficient losses to slow down his
rate of
learning and to cause ARC breaks.
A misunderstanding comes about in the first instance purely on
the basis
that the student understood that he was studying a given subject. An
irrelevant
question asked by an examiner indicates to the student that such an
understanding was false or that no basic agreement existed on the
subject in the
first place. An example of this would be to ask a student of a French
language
course to give the main historic dates and their significance to
Eighteenth
Century France. The original understanding was that the student was
learning to
speak and read French, not to learn the history of France.
In Scientology an example of an irrelevant question would be to
ask the
student to give the distribution of a bulletin. The understanding of
the student
is that he is there to learn Scientology, its theory and application,
not to
learn the internal administration of organizational communication
lines. A
further example would be to ask a Level II student a question
concerning data
and material covered in Level IV.
Frequently enough a Supervisor has to cope with a student who
has come
into Scientology to study the law of Karma or to study sociology or
some other
previous misconception without adding to the difficulties by asking
irrelevant
questions. Knowing what we now know about study we can handle earlier
misconceptions, but a Supervisor must never ask a question of a
student which is
irrelevant to the subject or level. We must ourselves be careful not
to add to
student confusion. Therefore, any Supervisor tendency to ask
irrelevant
questions must be firmly restrained.
In the second instance of the unknown question, a student can be
given a
verbal question on which he is flunked. In most cases the student will
not be
able to remember the question asked as he would not have flunked it in
the first
case if he had not already failed to understand the material covered
by the
question. Failure to remember the question asked or a Supervisor's
refusal to
give him the question asked reacts upon the student as an unanswered
question,
and therefore an uncompleted communication cycle, but also as an
unknown
question. The student will ARC break. You can easily demonstrate this
by
mumbling a question which is not clear enough to be understood and
then insist
upon an answer. You will soon enough have a very upset person on your
hands.
This is what happens when a student is asked a question,
flunked, and then
not given to clearly understand the question asked. Therefore Ron now
requires
that any examiner must always write down verbal questions asked before
asking
them, and when a student flunks, hand him the written question which
he flunked.
The student will then be able to know what he didn't know and be able
to look up
the material and
184
clear up what it was that he had not understood. Further, this will
enable him
to complete the communication cycle.
If tape examinations are addressed to a class as a whole, these
questions
must be posted and the examination papers returned to the student. The
student
can then see what it was that he missed and what question was missed.
Many people have had experience of such poor systems of
examination which
failed to follow the above. It is common practice in universities not
only not
to give students the questions asked, but also never to return
examination
papers. Most frequently all the university student is given is a
grade. If that
grade is not 100%, then the student never knows what it was he didn't
know and
so can not look it up to know it. This leaves him in the uncertain
condition of
insecurity about his data on a particular subject. And if the student
flunks the
subject and has to re-take it, he cannot comfortably study the subject
because
the whole of the subject has now become a complete mystery to him.
Thus, the
subject is set up as an ARC Break.
Universities probably do this to be sure that their examinations
do not
get out to students, but then one can only state that this is laziness
or lack
of ability on the part of professors to think of different questions,
or perhaps
even a professor's own lack of understanding of his subject sufficient
to enable
him to be able to think of enough ' questions to ask. It also could be
that
there ,is a complete lack, of worthwhile material in more primitive
subjects
than Scientology on which to ask questions, in which case it should
never have
been part of the curriculum. (Freudians mainly examine on the dates of
Freud's
papers for their qualification of psychiatrists!)
The administration of a proper system of examination is quite
simple:
1. Tape examinations or examination questions given verbally to the
class as
a whole, must be written down before being asked and must be
posted on a
bulletin board afterwards and all examination papers must be
returned to
the students.
2. Verbal questions asked of individual students must be noted down
in a book
like an invoice book with tear-out sheets and a piece of carbon
paper.
Such books are easily procured from stationers as they are used
in most
stores. The student is given the yellow copy of the questions
with the
flunked question plainly marked.' The white copy is placed in
the
examiner's folder for the bulletin, tape or material.
In this fashion we will be able to collect good questions to be
asked; to
notice fundamental areas of mis-understanding individual students
have; and to
note any areas of mis-understanding which are broadly mis-understood.
We can,
therefore, see where the individual Student needs help and see where
it is
necessary to elaborate more fully. on certain technical data in order
to make it
more broadly comprehensible.
Supervisors and examiners doing this will then be contributing
to the more
rapid progress of individual students and to students in general.
The same principles apply to the Department of Examinations and
any other
student examinations given.
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:ml.jp.rd The
Guardian WW
Copyright ($) 1965, 1967 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Note: In the original 1965 issue, the last two lines given here were
a footnote
added by LRH and read "HCO BOARD OF REVIEW. The same principles apply
to HCO
Board of Review Examinations and examiners."
This 1967 issue changed "Instructor" to "Supervisor" throughout.]
185
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 APRIL AD15
Remimeo
Sthil Students
Franchise
THE "HIDDEN DATA LINE"
Some students have believed there was a "hidden data line" of
tech in
Scientology, a line on which Scientology tech was given out by me but
not made
known to students.
This started me looking. For there is no such line.
I wondered if it was a "missed withhold of nothing". There can
be one of
these, you know. There is nothing there, yet the auditor tries to get
it and the
PC ARC Breaks. This is "cleaning a clean" with an B-Meter.
One pc I cleaned up very nicely had been harassed for years
about "an
incident that happened when she was five". A lot of people had tried
to "get
it". The pc was in a pitiful condition. I found there was nothing
there. No
incident at all! The meter read came from the charge on previous
auditing. I
think probably she must have sneezed or her finger slipped on the cans
when
first asked about "an incident when you were five".
An auditor who "sees a read" when there is no charge makes a
"missed
withhold of nothing".
This is the other side of the ARC Break-the gone something, the
non-
existence of something. No food. No money. These things ARC Break
people.
So it is with a "missed withhold of nothing".
Take Johannesburg. Some years ago the field there was upset by 3
rabble
rousers who alleged all manner of wild things about the Scientology
org there.
They held wild field meetings and all that. Truth was these three
people had
done a vicious thing and screamed to high heaven when I sought to
query them.
They made a "missed withhold of nothing" in the field in that
area! There
was exactly nothing wrong with Scientology there or us. There was
something
wrong with those three people. They had been stealing from the org.
The field kept looking for what was wrong with the org or us.
Nothing was.
So it couldn't be cleaned up because there was nothing to clean. There
were
three thieves who had run off with org property and defied orders to
give it
back. How this made something wrong with us is quite a puzzle. They
are still
"cleaning up this ARC Break" in Johannesburg! For it is not cleanable,
not being
there to be cleaned! Unless you realize there was nothing there at
all! It's a
missed withhold of nothing. The basic org and staff and we at Saint
Hill were
just doing our jobs in ordinary routine!
Governments looking for evil in Scientology orgs will go mad (I
trust) as
they are seeking a non-existent thing. They are easily defeated
because their
statements are so crazy even their own legal systems can't help but
see it. So
it's easily won.
The only person who goes mad on a missed withhold of nothing is
the person
who thinks there is something there that isn't.
So it is with the "hidden data line" students sometimes feel
must exist on
courses.
There is no line.
But in this case there is an apparency of a line.
When instructors or seniors give out alter-ised technology or
unusual
solutions, the student feels they must have some inside track, some
data line
the student doesn't have.
The student looks for it and starts alter-ising in his turn
pretending to
have it when they become instructors.
186
It's a missed withhold of nothing.
The whole of technology is released in HCO Bulletins and HCO
Policy
Letters and tapes I do and release.
I don't tell people anything in some private way, not even
instructors.
For instance, all the instructors I taught to handle R6 we
taught by my
lecturing or writing bulletins for them. Every one of these tapes is
used to
teach GPM data and handling to students on the Saint Hill Course.
Any new data I have given on it has been given to all these
people.
The instructor then knows only to the degree he has studied and
used the
very same HCOBs and HCO Pol Ltrs and tapes the student is now using.
There is no "hidden data line". To believe there is makes an ARC
Break.
The apparency is somebody's pretence to know from me more than
is on the
tapes and in books and mimeos, or, brutally, somebody's alter-is of
materials.
This looks like a "hidden data line". It surely isn't.
All the lower level materials are in the HCOBs, Pol Ltrs or on
tapes.
All the GPM materials released are here waiting for the student
when he
reaches that level.
One could say there was one if one was way off the main data
line. But it
sure isn't hidden. It's on courses and in orgs.
I laughed one time at the top flight US Government White House
entrusted
psychologist. He looked over some startling IQ changes, said such a
thing would
revolutionize psychology overnight if known and added "no wonder you
keep your
technology secret!"
That is very funny when you look at how hard you and I work to
make it
known to all!
The data line isn't hidden. It's there for anyone to have.
There's lots of
it is possibly a source of trouble in releasing it. But it's all on
courses in
Academies or Saint Hill. You could have a copy of everything in the
tape library
if you wanted. It might cost a lot, but you could have it.
There is no hidden data line.
There's a lot of data I haven't had time to write down and put
on a line
for sheer press of time. But I work hard to do it.
But even my closest staff and communicators when it hears of a
new process
or plan from me verbally, sees it in an HCOB or HCO Pol Ltr a few days
later.
Don't for heaven's sake mistake alter-is by somebody as evidence
of a
hidden line.
In Scientology we say "If it isn't written it isn't true". That
applies to
orders. Somebody says "Ron said to ..." and on a veteran staff you
hear the
rejoinder "Let's see it". I've had raw meat walk into an org and say
"Ron said I
was to have 25 hours of auditing". And in the raw meat days of orgs,
they
sometimes were given it. So we have learned the hard way-"If it isn't
written it
wasn't said".
And that applies to anybody's orders, not just mine.
And on tech and policy, it's equally true. If it isn't in an
HCOB or an
HCO Pol Ltr or recorded on a tape in my voice, it isn't tech or
policy.
Next time you hear a pretended order or a squirrel process
attributed to me, say "If it isn't written or recorded it isn't true".
And watch how tech results soar then in that area.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
187
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 APRIL AD 15
Sthil Students Issue II
Former Sthil Grads TECH & QUAL DIVISION POLICY
Tech Sec HAT
D of T HAT DRILLS, ALLOWED
D of Exam HAT (Dir of Exams must check out this Pol Ltr
D of Review HAT on the above Hats and put on their Status
Check Sheet for Directors)
The only allowed Practical drills on any Scientology Course
including
PE are:
1. Modified Comm Course for PE.
2. Original Comm Course TRs 0-4.
3. Original Upper Indoc TRs.
4. B-Meter Drills contained in Book of E-Meter Drills.
5. Dissemination Drills when I write and release them.
NO other practical drills of any kind will be permitted.
Other Practical Drills are abolished. Reasons: They consume time
uselessly, suppress actual processes and mess up data and cases. I did
not
develop or authorize these drills and have now seen that they teach
alter-is of
easy processes. They are not needed. They make poor auditors. I have
just
reviewed this matter thoroughly and have traced several training
failures to
these Wild cat Drills. Further, I traced several failed cases on
course to them.
----------
Somewhere along the line somebody went mad inventing "drills"
and "TRs".
If this is permitted to continue, we will no longer turn out
good
auditors.
The standard drills as listed above have proven sufficient for
years.
----------
LEGAL CHECK SHEETS
A check sheet is only legal if approved by the Office of LRH
Technical
Section Saint Hill.
CHECK SHEET POLICY
A check sheet may not be changed once it is placed in a
student's hands
for that course.
It may be changed before being handed to the next student who
enters that
course but not changed on who has it.
The certificate and Classification are based on the materials in
existence
at the time the certificate was studied for and granted.
If a student was never classed, a student must now be classed on
the lower
classifications before obtaining a higher one.
To get over knotty classification exam problems where a student
is being
classed for a class higher than studied for after training at that
higher level,
a Summary Classification Exam may be given covering the essentials of
auditing
as they have existed for many years. If passed, all lower classes are
granted.
However a student not holding non-honorary classification on
entering
Saint Hill
188
must study for his lower classes as they currently exist before being
trained
at an upper level. The reason for this is entirely sensible-such a
student would
fail at the higher level if studied at once and only it were studied.
We don't
want him to fail.
Grade Certificates obtained in Org HGCs are now honoured at
Saint Hill. In
eases which have gained poorly, however, I exercise the right to have
run very
low level (sub zero) processes that get the case moving well before
returning to
upper grades. This again is sensible.
The adjustment of cases and classes is temporary and comes from
settling
down new materials into place. Saint Hill is always considerably ahead
in tech
and when all lower levels are released in full and have been practised
and
taught in orgs for a year or two, Saint Hill will no longer have to
"cope" in
order to get maximum auditor skill from training or maximum case gain
in pcs.
After all, we started making Saint Hill auditors for orgs only a few
years ago!
Taking unlawful items off a student's check sheet is not
illegal.
To mark out legal check outs on a check sheet (cross them off)
when not
actually checked out is illegal.
Running a "course" with no check sheet is illegal. A Scientology
Course is
defined as "Progress through a check sheet".
Checking out any materials on anyone without giving a preserved
credit for
eventual check sheet is illegal.
HAT CHECK SHEETS
Anyone HAT checked or bulletin or Pol Ltr checked ona staff MUST
now be
given credit for anything checked out on them.
While STATUS CHECK SHEETS are still in process of formation and
org data
and hat materials is still being released for orgs, a record of
anything checked
out on a staff member must be kept.
There will be several of these STATUS CHECK SHEETS. They have
numbers.
While the material is still being issued, the org hat checker
must have a
file with staff members' names in it and must record on a sheet of
paper for
that staff member each HCO Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape checked out
on that
staff member.
Later when the STATUS CHECK SHEETS are released, the already
checked out
items on that staff member's rough sheet are to be transferred to the
proper
STATUS CHECK SHEET and sets of these new check sheets will replace the
original
rough check sheet in the same file. "Status" is covered in a HCO Pol
Ltr of
similar data, "PERSONNEL".
Still later there will be actual hat BOOKS for each Division and
the
materials required for "status" will be in them. Until then we will
use a rough
system. The same material with perhaps some number changes will be in
the HAT
BOOKS.
The policy is: NO staff member in ANY org may be HAT CHECKED
without its
being recorded on a rough sheet in a staff member file and credited to
that
staff member!
NO REPORT
An illegible auditor's report is classed as a no-report and an
illegible
case folder is classed as a "no case folder".
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
189
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1965
Issue II
Gen Non Remimeo
Tech Sec Hat
SUPERVISORS
The title Instructor is changed herewith to Supervisor.
"Instructor" is a MISNOMER in Scientology. They don't instruct
anyone.
They actually should only supervise the student to make sure he is
instructed
by HCO Bs, tapes and books, and be sure he does his drills.
The use of "instructor" gives a tendency to alter-is tech which
alter-is
of tech is now the only thing that can prevent case gains.
An "Instructor" who thinks he is Instructing will be able to
handle only
about 1/5 the number of students he could handle if he supervised.
Therefore it
will cost you valuable personnel to use the term "Instructor" or let
training
personnel even get the idea they are instructing.
Supervisors just call rolls and make sure the proper operation
of the
course takes place and that the students are orderly and on schedule.
They even
make better auditors out of the students than instructors would.
At Saint Hill we have for many years had Theory Supervisors,
Practical
Supervisors, etc. The title Course Supervisor has been the title of
the Saint
Hill Special Briefing Course head since it began.
Therefore all instructors or Chief Instructors in the world are
promoted
to Supervisors, Theory Supervisors and Practical Supervisors.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:mh.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Amended by HCO P/L 27 October 1970 Issue II, The Course Supervisor,
in the
1970 Year Book.]
190
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY 1965
Remimeo TECH DIV
QUAL DIV
URGENT
CCHs
(Cancels HCO Pol Ltr 15 May 62)
The CCHs are PROCESSES. They are not drills.
HCO P01 Ltr of 15 May 1962 (replacing 2 Nov 61 HCO Pol Ltr) was
written by
staff. It is CANCELLED. Processes are not drills. Nobody may convert
hereafter a
process to a drill.
The Upper Indoc TRs are the drills that teach the CCHs.
The CCHs are then run on pcs.
S-C-S processes may not be drills.
Processes are done on pcs.
Drills are done by students to accustom them to the actions that
will be
necessary in doing processes.
Upper Indoc contains TRs 5 to 9. These are done as the ONLY
practical
actions leading to the student being able to run the processes called
the CCHs.
To use a PROCESS as a DRILL leaves it unflat on students and is
one of the
many reasons why auditing has been taken out of Academies.
During the past few years, unbeknownst to me, a whole sphere of
action
built up which made students drill processes. I swear, there has been
a
"practical drill" made out of half the processes we have.
These were all abolished as DRILLS in HCO P01 Ltr 16 April AD
15.
Drills are just actions the student has to become familiar with
before
doing processes. The actual process is NEVER used as a drill. Because
it is left
unflat. A drill takes the action the auditor will use when doing a
process and
gets him familiar with it. That's all.
LRH:mh.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 AUGUST 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo Issue III
DELETION OF TR 5
As TR 5 is a process, it is to be dropped as a part of the TRs.
This
Policy Letter cancels any reference to TR 5 in any former Policy
Letter.
The Comm Course TRs are TRs 0 - 4. The Upper Indoc TRs are TRs 6
- 9.
Delete TR 5 from any Check Sheet.
LRH:mI.rd
Copyright ($) 1965 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
191
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 AUGUST 1965
Sthil Foundation
Students
SCIENTOLOGY TRAINING
TWIN CHECKOUTS
(Excerpts from HCO Policy Letters of
4 October 1964 and 24 September 1964
rewritten)
In Scientology training we use a system called TWIN CHECKOUTS.
Each
student is assigned a "twin" to work with. The student studies his
assigned
material and is sometimes coached over the rough spots by his twin.
When the
student knows the material, he is then given a checkout by his twin.
If he
flunks, he returns to study and when ready gets a new checkout. When
he passes,
the twin signs the assignment sheet certifying that he has grasped it.
The
assignment sheet is turned in to the Course Supervisor at the end of
the period.
BAD STUDY HABITS
Earlier forms of education suffer because of a habit. The habit
is all
one's years of formal schooling where this mistake is the whole way of
life.
If the student knows the words, the teacher assumes he knows the
tune.
It will never do a student any good at all to know some facts.
The student
is expected only to use facts.
It is so easy to confront thought and so hard to confront action
that the
teacher often complacently lets the student mouth words and ideas that
mean
nothing to the student.
ALL THEORY CHECKOUTS MUST CONSULT THE STUDENT'S UNDERSTANDING.
If they don't, they're useless and will upset the student
eventually.
Course difficulties stem entirely from the students' non-
comprehension of
words and data.
While this can be cured by auditing, why audit it all the time
when you
can prevent it in the first place by adequate theory checkout?
There are two phenomena here.
FIRST PHENOMENON
When a student misses understanding a word, the section right
after that
word is a blank in his memory. You can always trace back to the word
just before
the blank, get it understood and find miraculously that the former
blank area is
not now blank in the text. The above is pure magic.
SECOND PHENOMENON
The second phenomenon occurs after the student has gone by many
misunderstood words. He begins to dislike the subject being studied,
more and
more. This is followed by various mental and physical conditions and
by various
complaints, fault-finding and look-what-you-did-to-me. This justifies
a
departure, a blow, from the subject being studied.
But the system of education, frowning on blows as it does,
causes the
student to really withdraw self from the study subject (whatever he
was
studying) and set up in its place a circuit which can receive and give
back
sentences and phrases.
We now have "the quick student who somehow never applies what he
learns".
The specific phenomena then is that a student can study some
words and
give them back and yet be no participant to the action. The student
gets A+ on
exams but can't apply the data.
192
Demonstration is the key here. The moment you ask this type of
student to
demonstrate a rule or theory with his hands or the paper clips on your
desk this
glibness will shatter.
The reason for this is that in memorizing words or ideas, the
student can
still hold the position that it has nothing to do with him or her. It
is a total
circuit action. Therefore, very glib. The moment you say "Demonstrate"
that word
or idea or principle, the student has to have something to do with it.
And shatters.
The thoroughly dull student is just stuck in the non-comprehend
blankness
following some misunderstood word.
The "very bright" student who yet can't use the data isn't there
at all.
He has long since ceased to confront the subject matter or the
subject.
The cure for either of these conditions of "bright non-
comprehension" or
"dull" is to find the missing word.
But these conditions can be prevented by not letting the student
go beyond
the missed word without grasping its meaning. And that is the duty of
the twin.
COACHING IN THEORY
Coaching Theory means getting a student to define all the words,
give all
the rules, demonstrate things in the text with his hands or bits of
things, and
also may include doing Definitions of Scientology terms.
The usual Course Supervisor action would be to have any student
who is
having any trouble or is slow or glib team up with a twin of
comparable
difficulties and have them turn about with each other with Theory
Coaching.
Then when they have a text assignment coached, they give their
twin a
checkout. The checkout is a spot checkout, a few definitions or rules
and some
demonstration of them.
DEMONSTRATION
Giving a text assignment check by seeing if it can be quoted or
paraphrased proves exactly nothing. This will not guarantee that the
student
knows the data or can use or apply it nor even guarantees that the
student is
there. Neither the "bright" student nor the "dull" student (both
suffering from
the same malady) will benefit from such an examination.
So examining by seeing if somebody "knows" the text and can
quote or
paraphrase it is completely false and must not be done.
Correct examination is done only by making the person being
tested answer
(a) The meanings of the words (re-defining the words used in
his own
words and demonstrating their use in his own made up
sentences), and
(b) Demonstrating how the data is used.
The twin can ask what the words mean. And the twin can ask for
examples of
action or application.
"What is the first paragraph?" is about as dull as one can get.
"What are
the rules given about ?" is a question I would never bother
to ask.
Neither of these tell the twin whether he has the bright non-applier
or the dull
student before him. Such questions just beg for natter and course
blows.
I would go over the first paragraph of any material I was
examining a
student on and pick out some uncommon words. I'd ask the student to
define each
and demonstrate its use in a made up sentence and flunk the first
"Well... .er.
...let me see and that would be the end of that checkout. I
wouldn't pick out
only Scientologese. I'd pick out words that weren't too ordinary such
as
"benefit" "permissive" "calculated" as well as "engram".
Students I was personally examining would begin to get a hunted
look and
carry dictionaries-BUT THEY WOULDN'T BEGIN TO NATTER OR GET SICK OR
BLOW. AND
THEY'D USE WHAT THEY LEARNED.
193
Above all, I myself would be sure I knew what the words meant
before I
started to examine.
Dealing with new technology and the necessity to have things
named, we
especially need to be alert.
Before you curse our terms, remember that a lack of terms to
describe
phenomena can be twice as incomprehensible as having involved terms
that at
least can be understood eventually.
We do awfully well, really, better than any other science or
subject. We
lack a dictionary but we can remedy that.
But to continue with how one should examine, when the student
had the
words, I'd demand the music. What tune do these words play?
I'd say "All right, what use is this text assignment to you?"
Questions
like, "Now this rule here about not letting pcs eat candy while being
audited,
how come there'd be such a rule?" And if the student couldn't imagine
why, I'd
go back to the words just ahead of that rule and find the one he
hadn't grasped.
I'd ask "What are the 3 parts of the ARC triangle?" And when the
student
gave them, I'd still have the task of satisfying myself that the
student
understood why those were the 3 parts. I'd ask "How come?" after he'd
given them
to me. Or "What are you going to do with these?"
But if the student wasn't up to the point of study where knowing
why he
used the ARC triangle was not part of his materials, I wouldn't ask.
For all the
data about not examining above level applies very severely to Theory
Checkout as
well as to Practical and general Instruction.
I might also have a stack of paper clips and rubber bands and
use them to
have students show me they knew the words and ideas.
Theory often says "Well, they take care of all that in
Practical." Oh no
they don't. When you have a Theory Section that believes that,
Practical can't
function at all.
Practical goes through the simple motions. Theory covers why one
goes
through the motions.
I don't think I have to beat this to death for you.
You've got it.
DICTIONARIES
Dictionaries should be available to students in Theory and
should be used
in Twin Checkouts as well, preferably the same publication.
Dictionaries don't
always agree with each other.
No Twin should try to define English language words out of his
own head
when correcting a student as it leads to too many arguments. On
English words,
open a dictionary.
A Scientology dictionary will be available in a few months from
the date
of this bulletin as one is being rushed into publication.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
194
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1965
Issue V
Remimeo
Tech Div
Sthil Students
E-METER DRILLS
Having the data that Out-technology is the result of a lack of
study,
drill and familiarity, it is imperative that meter drills be done
well.
As it is the Academy's purpose to train auditors, students must
do the
required meter drills for each level and must not resort to the use of
a pen to
represent the needle of an E-Meter.
Irrespective of whether a student is or is not a Release, these
drills
must be done. If a student should have a coach whose needle Only
floats, that
student should request of the Supervisor another coach.
The state of Release can always be rehabilitated, so the Academy
should
not be overly concerned with the protection of Releases. Studying the
mind and
spirit of Man may be restimulative, but it is the only way through and
out.
A real Roller Coaster of processing results is never because of
restimulation caused by training, it is always the sole result of
association
with a Suppressive Person.
Don't back off in the training of auditors. Only a well trained
auditor
will eventually make it all the way to Clear.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
195
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 DECEMBER 1965
Remimeo
Academy Students
other than St Hill
Tech Division-Qual Division
STUDENTS GUIDE TO ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR
GENERAL
1. Adhere completely to the Code of a Scientologist for the
duration of the
course and behave in a manner becoming to a Scientologist at all
times.
2. Get sufficient food and sleep. Always eat breakfast before class
and
morning sessions.
3. When being a preclear, be one, not a student or auditor. When
being an
auditor, be an Auditor, not a student or preclear. When in class
and
lectures, be a student not an auditor or a preclear.
4. Get off all your known withholds. Know definitely that you have
absolutely
no hope for case advancement unless you get these known
withholds off to
your auditor. Any violation of rules must be reported by the
auditor on
the auditing report for the preclear so that they are no longer
withholds
from -L. Ron Hubbard, Mary Sue Hubbard or Supervisors.
5. If you don't know something or are confused about course data,
ask a
Supervisor or send a despatch. Do not ask other students as this
creates
progressively worsening errors in data. Also dispatches from you
to L. Ron
Hubbard will be relayed if you place all such in the basket
marked
"Students Out".
6. Students may only use the coin box telephone during non class
periods.
7. You must get the permission of the Office of L. Ron Hubbard to
leave
course before you are allowed to leave. You won't be released if
there is
any doubt that you are inadequate technically or your case is
considered
in poor condition. Give an advanced warning as to when you are
leaving.
AUDITING
8. Do not consume any alcoholic beverage between 6 a.m. on Sundays
and after
class on Fridays.
9. Do not consume or have administered to yourself or any other
student any
drug, antibiotics, aspirin, barbiturates, opiates, sedatives,
hypnotics or
medical stimulants for the duration of the course without the
approval of
the D of T.
10. Do not give any processing to anyone under any circumstances
without
direct permission of the D of T. (Emergency assists excepted.)
11. Do not receive any processing from anyone under any
circumstances without
the express permission of the D of T.
12. Do not engage in any "self-processing" under any circumstances
during the
course at any time.
13. Do not receive any treatment, guidance, or help from anyone in
the healing
arts, i.e. physician, dentist, etc, without the consent of the D
of
T/Ethics Officer. (Emergency treatment when the D of T is not
available is
excepted.)
14. Do not engage in any rite, ceremony, practice, exercise,
meditation, diet,
food therapy or any similar occult, mystical, religious,
naturopathic,
homeopathic, chiropractic treatment or any other healing or
mental therapy
while on course without the express permission of the D of
T/Ethics
Officer.
196
15. Do not discuss your case, your Auditor, your Supervisors, your
classmates,
L. Ron Hubbard, HCO WW personnel or HCO WW with anyone. Save
your unkind
or critical thoughts for your processing sessions or take up
complaints
with any supervisor.
16. Do not engage in any sexual relationships of any nature or kind
or get
emotionally involved with any classmate who is not your legal
spouse.
17. Follow the Auditor's Code during all sessions when being the
Auditor.
18. Follow technical procedure as outlined on the course exactly and
precisely.
19. Be honest at all times on your auditing report forms. Stating
every
process run, Tone Arm changes and times, sensitivity setting,
cognitions
of your preclear and any changes of physical appearance,
reactions,
communication level, or otherwise what you observe in your
preclear.
20. Place all reports in the folder of your preclear after each
session, turn
into the Examiner for classification.
21. Students must not read their own report folder or that of
another student,
unless he is auditing that student.
PREMISES
22. Do not make any undue noise either indoors, or when leaving
class.
23. Use the correct entrances for entering and leaving the premises.
QUARTERS
24. Do not put cigarettes out in plastic waste baskets or on the
floors.
25. Keep all your bulletins, supplies and personal possessions in
the space
allotted to you and keep your space neat and orderly.
26. Students are allowed to smoke during breaks only and always
outside any
study or auditing quarters.
27. The basket marked "Student In" is the basket where all
communications,
bulletins or mail to students are placed. Always check this
basket daily
to see if you have received any communications.
28. Report and turn in any damaged property or goods used on the
Course.
Protect and keep the premises in good condition.
29. No food may be stored or eaten in the Classrooms at any time.
SCHEDULES
30. Be on time for class and all assignments.
31. Buy any books you need from the invoice clerk at appointed
times.
32. Follow all schedules exactly.
33. Study and work during your class periods and over weekends. You
have a lot
to get checked out on in order to get a course completion. You
can't
afford to waste time.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:emp.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
197
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 OCTOBER 1966
Remimeo
Tech Hats Issue IV
Qual Hats
Students EXAMINATIONS
A student must not discuss any examination with anyone outside
the
Qualifications Division. To give examination information to other
students in
order to assist them shows a misguided understanding of help. A
student should
pass an examination on the basis that he does know and can apply the
data, not
on the basis that he knows and can pass the examination. Only by being
able to
know and apply the data can a student be an accomplished auditor at
any Level.
Therefore, students are not to discuss examinations with other
students
for whatever reason.
Further, students who fail examinations or any question thereon
are not to
discuss such failure or reasons for such with anyone other than the
personnel of
the Qualifications Division. This regulation includes not only other
students,
but Course Supervisors. Data as to examination failures is supplied
from the
Qualifications Division to the Technical Division, and a student, not
knowing
the data sufficiently well, can cause Dev-T by reporting false data to
a Course
Supervisor as to why the examination was failed.
Any student who feels that he has been incorrectly failed on an
examination can report the matter to Ethics. This is the proper line
for any
complaint the student may have concerning an examination, if such
still seems
incorrect after taking it up with the Qualifications Division.
LRH rd
Copyright 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 DECEMBER 1966
St Hill Only
All Staff
Day and Fdn
ROUTING AND HANDLING OF SHSBC, DIANETIC,
SOLO VI AND ACADEMY STUDENTS
Any student on the Foundation SHSBC, Dianetic, Solo VI and
Academy Courses
is first and foremost a student during the Foundation hours. This rule
is true
regardless of what other activities they undertake on their own time.
ORDERS AND ROUTING
Any orders or routings given to a student by another section of
the Org
which will interfere with course hours must be done via the Tech
Director,
Training Officer and the Course Supervisor of the student concerned.
The sole
intention of the latter is to prevent students from disappearing from
course
into the HGC, Review, or anywhere else, without the supervisor having
directly
sent the student.
Haskell Cooke Org Sec F
Frank Freedman D/Qual F
Julia Galpin D/HCO F
Julia Galpin AC F
Julia Galpin LRH Comm F
Otto Roos Ad Council SH
Ken Delderfield LRH Comm SH
Pam Pearcy Ad Council WW
Philip Quirino LRH Comm WW
Sheena Fairchild Guardian Comm
WW
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:jp.rd The Guardian
Copyright ($) 1966 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
198
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1967
Remimeo
Academies
SHSBC
STUDY
COMPLEXITY AND CONFRONTING
In some researches I have been doing recently on the field of
study, I
have found what appears to be the basic law on complexity.
It is:
THE DEGREE OF COMPLEXITY IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE DEGREE OF NON
CONFRONT.
Reversing this:
THE DEGREE OF SIMPLICITY IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE DEGREE OF
CONFRONT
and
THE BASIS OF ABERRATION IS A NON-CONFRONT.
To the degree that a being cannot confront he enters substitutes
which,
accumulating, bring about a complexity.
I found this while examining the subject of NAVIGATION in order
to teach
it and clarify it.
I found that Man had based the subject on an incorrect primary
assumption.
All subjects have as their basis a point of first assumption. In Man's
technology this is usually weak and non-factual which makes his
technology very
frail and limited. To reform a subject one has to find this primary
assumption
and improve it. This reforming of technical subjects is of great
interest to us
because our subject Scientology is advanced even beyond the space
travel
technologies of very high civilizations. Yet it is flanked on all
sides by Man's
corny antique technology in the field of physics, chemistry,
"mathematics" and
so on. This tends to hold us back somewhat. We strained his tech
forward to get
the E-Meter, the one thing we had to have.
In Navigation, man bases the whole subject on the assumption
that one
can't confront where he came from or is going or where he is. It
assumes he is
lost.
This is a basis assumption of non-confront. He can't directly
see where he
has been or where he is going at sea-it is so large-so he takes off
from a point
of no-confront in all his reasoning in the subject.
Therefore he goes into a series of symbols and begins to
substitute
symbols for symbols. This winds him up in a mass of complexity. One
spends 90%
of his time in studying this subject trying to find out what symbols
the symbols
are meant to represent. He says in his texts "G.H.A." On search we
find this
means "Greenwich Hour Angle". On further search we find this means
what angle
some heavenly body forms when related to Greenwich as Zero. On further
search we
find the idiocy that the navigator's clock tells angles in HOURS when
all he 0
needs is a clock face giving 360 degrees. This is of course complete
nonsense. 0
Why hours, and two sets of 12 at that (midnight to Noon and Noon to
midnight)
when what he is trying to find out is how many degrees of time has
passed. He
refers his time to the Sun which, because of the rotations of earth
every 24
hours, appears at an increasing number of degrees from Greenwich
England as the
day advances.
Because he starts from a no-confront of ship or plane position
he then
carries no-confront through the whole subject. If a man isn't lost as
he begins
to "navigate" he very often is when he finishes!
Actually no ship or plane is ever lost as to position. One knows
he is on
Earth and
199
in what ocean and on what side of what ocean and the subject really
should be
one which merely lets one CORRECT his position a bit.
Man in this subject of navigation even scorns direct observation
(confront) and calls it "jackass navigation!"
In actual fact real navigation is the science of recognition of
positions
and objects and estimation of relative distances and angles between
them.
The subject is made complex because it has become, in Man's
hands, the
substitution of symbols for symbols all based on the assumption that
he can't
confront his departure, his current spot or his point of arrival.
Out of this, with further study in other fields, I found that
any
complexity stemmed from an initial point of non-confront.
This is why looking at or recognizing the source of an
aberration in
processing "blows" it, makes it vanish.
Mental mass accumulates in a vast complexity solely because one
would not
confront something. To take apart a problem requires only to establish
what one
could not or would not confront.
The basic thing man can't or won't confront is evil.
These people who always rationalize evil behavior-"He wasn't
feeling well
which is why he murdered the policeman", etc., can be counted on to
voice some
theetie-weetie (goodie-goodie) justification for somebody's thoroughly
evil
conduct. Mr. X wrecks a house and you remark on it and Miss Theetie
Weetie will
feel compelled to say, "Oh, Mr. X had a poor childhood and he didn't
mean any
wrong . . . ." She can't confront the simple but evil fact that Mr. X
is a
complete dog. One feels his hair stand on end when Miss Theetie Weetie
does this
because one is observing a complete non-confront on the part of Miss
Theetie
Weetie. She is too unreal to do other than make one feel he has had an
ARC
Break.
One will also find that Miss Theetie Weetie leads a horribly
complex life-
adjust ing her thinking to agree with "air spirits" and leaving her
family
because there might be mice in the basement.
When no-confront enters, a chain may be set up which leads to
total
complexity and total unreality.
This, in a very complex form we call an "aberrated condition".
People like that can't solve even rudimentary problems and act
in an
aimless and confused way.
To resolve their troubles requires more than education or
discipline. It
requires processing.
Some people are so "complex" that their full aberration does
fully not
resolve until they attain a high level of OT.
A large number of people de-aberrate just by the education
contained in
Scientology as they find in our subject the natural laws of life and
seeing
(confronting) them, "blow" huge holes in their complexities and
aberrations.
Therefore the above laws are very important ones as they explain
what
aberration really is and why processing really works.
Aberration is a chain of vias based on a primary non-confront.
Processing is a series of methods arranged on an increasingly
deep scale
of bringing the preclear to confront the no-confront sources of his
aberrations
and leading them to a simple, powerful, effective being.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
200
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 OCTOBER 1967
Issue VII
Remimeo
ACADEMY
ETHICS
ACADEMY CHECKSHEETS
SUPERVISOR CONDITIONS
Academy check sheets should be designed to be covered in one
week for
Theory and one week for Practical for each level 0 to IV.
If a student is more than 2 weeks on one of these Theory or one
of these
Practical Courses then the Supervisor for that level, theory or
practical, is
placed in Non Existence Condition.
The secret in getting students through is keeping Ethics in in
the
Academy. Time lost because the student is sent to Ethics or Review is
not
counted and is added to the 2 weeks allowed.
The rest of the secret is to spot a slow student at once and get
a
CORRECT Remedy A and Remedy B done on him, in Remedy B listing for and
finding
the correct troublesome PT subject and then listing that for similar
past
subjects being careful not to restrict the past question to this life
as it is
almost always an earlier life. In Remedy B getting the correct item
off each of
the 2 lists (the PT list and Past list) will always dig any non-SP
student out.
In doing Remedy A one lists for the misunderstood word and gets the
correct one.
A Supervisor can chit a Review Auditor for job endangerment if
Review
fails to straighten up the student or accumulates a backlog.
Seniors who fail to assign non-existence to such a Supervisor
arc in turn
up the line so assigned.
Academies tend to slow or stop students with SHSBC check lists
or unreal
or altered training and so bar out Scientologists. We don't expect
that much
from Academy grads.
On the Dianetics Course it should be I month of training. If a
student is
in that course more than 2 months the Supervisor goes into non-
existence as
above.
In Evening Courses, one month for theory and one month for
practical
should be the design. If a student is on more than 2 months then the
Supervisor
goes into Non Existence.
Supervisors so assigned non-existence get out of it by applying
the
formula and are upgraded when they have done so to Danger until they
have
applied that formula and so on back to Normal Operation or above.
The Int Tech Officer WW is responsible for the shortness and
adequacy of
these check sheets. Many have been done in the past and there is
little labour
involved in reissuing them.
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
201
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MARCH 1968
Remimco
CHECKSHEETS
ALL CHECKSHEETS FOR DIANETIC COURSES, ACADEMY COURSES,
SHSBC AND INTERNES MUST BE ORIGINATED AND PASSED ON BY WW
BEFORE USE AND MUST BE STANDARD WW TO COMPILE, ORIGINATE AND
REGULATE ALL CHECK-SHEETS UP TO VII.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jc.kd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 OCTOBER 1968
Remimeo
All staff
All students
COURSE COMPLETION
STUDENT INDICATORS
When a student has finished a course, he should want the next
course in training. If not, out Tech or out Ethics or both. Just as a PC's
good indicators should be in wanting next level of auditing, so should a
student's good indicators be in wanting next level of training. If this is
not the case something missed by the supervisor or student or both the
supervisor and the student.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nf.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
202
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 OCTOBER 1968
Remimeo
Supervisors
D of Ts
Supervisor Hat SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW
Supervisor
Checksheet Running the Class
To be an effective Supervisor one must know that there is
Standard Tech
and therefore that there is Standard Supervision.
Tech is contained ONLY in HCOBs, tapes and books written and
issued by
LRH. So is Standard Supervision.
The Supervisor's job consists of
1. Noting that the class members are present on time.
2. Calling roll.
3. Introduction of new students or those returning from the
Examiner.
4. R. Factor for new comers.
5. Handling queries and/or questions regarding the course and its
running.
6. Ensuring that space and equipment are available.
7. Seeing that Tech Services personnel provide top service and no
sloppy
"help yourself to what ever you want".
8. Seeing that breaks are started and completed promptly with
Rollcall.
9. Area must be neat and tidy at all times. Uniform chairs and
tables used
and squared away, excess student gear stowed elsewhere.
10. A library containing all the books and pabs should be available
should
the bookstore run out of literature.
11. Students do not arrive or leave on their own accord.
12. They are not to interrupt each other at work and all questions
should be
directed to the Supervisor who will refer them to the material
which
contains the information required.
13. NEVER NEVER allow anyone to walk in and interrupt or address any
student
on course.
14. The Supervisor is there and there on time.
15. The schedule runs exactly on time, never varying.
As Supervisor it is your responsibility to eradicate any
barriers or hindrances presented which distract the student from studying.
This includes extra curricular activities.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ew.ei.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
203
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 OCTOBER 1968
Remimeo Issue II
Supervisors
ID of T's
Supervisor's Hat
Supervisor's Checksheet
SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW
Handling the Student
To be an on-the-ball Supervisor, one should be oneself fully
trained on
the level one is supervising. It is by far preferable to be a Class
VIII with
a full grasp of Standard Tech.
As Tech once whittled away across the planet and finally went so
badly
out it had to be urgently rescued, it follows that out-supervision
must have
pioneered the route of out-tech. So it's no light matter not knowing
one's
business as a Supervisor and the consequences of mis- or non-
application of
study data.
These must be known. As the student is a student, it follows
there is some
willingness to learn. This must be validated and encouraged including
by
unmentioned wins as in TR 4.
As he or she is there to study attention must be channeled and
kept on
that vector and any side tracks knocked out and eradicated during the
period set
aside for study.
Any difficulties arising (and there will be in the course of
study) refer
the student to materials just ahead. Locate, indicate and get defined
the
misunderstood.
Handle any student having trouble with study by:
(a) Getting hold of the material he is studying.
(b) Getting hold of the material he was studying.
(c) Finding what he says he has trouble with.
(d) Take up the area or material PRIOR to it and find what is
bugging him.
(e) Remedy A and B handles this also.
(f) Do not send a student to review unless he says he wants a review-
then
send him to the examiner.
(g) If the student doesn't apply this data on dope off and
misunderstoods,
then a pink sheet on the HCOBs will handle that. Clay Table
Training HCOB
11.10.67 is most beneficial when applied exactly.
It sometimes appears that you have a different or difficult
student on
your course.
The same rules apply. Standard Tech is applicable and works on
all cases.
What you are doing and using is straightening their heads out.
So don't
desist. Keep at it until the guy gets the idea, does it himself and
starts
cleaning up misunderstoods in the standard manner.
He'll do it on his own and then on others.
L RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ew.ldm.rw.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
204
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 OCTOBER 1968
Issue III
Remimeo
Supervisors
D of Ts
Supervisor Hat
Supervisor Checksheet
SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW
R Factor to Students
When a student has enrolled his last stop is at the supervisor's
desk.
An R Factor as follows should be made:
Welcome the student. to the course and tell him the name and
level. Give
him the time it starts and ends with break periods.
Any business is to be conducted out of study hours and no random
breaks
are allowed.
Inform him of the rules, setting up of chairs and tables, where
�lay demo
table is, notice board, master checksheet and additions or
subtractions, points
system and checkout system and how it operates.
THEN send him off to tech services to get his materials; when he
returns
say "Start".
This action immediately establishes 8C for the student and he
now knows
who is in charge.
All his queries and questions are to be referred to the
supervisor, as he
must know it is the supervisor's job to refer students to where data
may be
found in the materials.
It is not anybody's job and certainly not another student's
responsibility
to do so.
Students are introduced at the beginning or end of a study
period, not
during.
Students returning from the examiner are announced-the only
break. The
response is inevitably enthusiastic and the students get busily back
to work
after such a success.
Those from cramming or who have flunked are returned
unannounced.
On Friday nights the last half hour is spent on graduation when
top
students and those who have certified or classified or graduated are
announced.
The graduate is usually allowed to address the group and this would
consist of
the knowledge obtained from Scientology, what a wonderful group of
people to
work with the group was, what next course or study will be done, etc.
End off with asking how they did. You might even be surprised at
the
result of implementing a safe, stable study environment, well
controlled and
done with Standard Supervision.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ldm.rw.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
205
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 OCTOBER 1968
Issue IV
Remimeo
Supervisors
D of T's
Supervisor Hat
Supervisor Checksheet
SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW
Tips in Handling Students
From time to time it will be found that when students enroll on
a course,
the question of misunderstoods arises. This is best handled by getting
the
student to hunt up and define with the source of the definition (HCOB
Date book
name and page no.). This allows the student to grasp the meaning of
the words
used in the study of Scientology. Words other than Scientology or
Dianetic words
are also clarified.
A real stopper can be the words Scientology or Dianetics.
Consult the
student's understanding and not just accept what sounds like a
definition of
these two words.
Simple points like "why is level 0 level 0?" can produce
astonishing
resurgences in study velocity.
Using the questions "where were you doing well" and "where did
you notice
you ceased doing well" zeroes in on the point or word or principle
misunderstood
and sometimes just the first question blows the lot.
On many occasions it's the first word on the material or the
title of the
HCOB so even check these.
Sometimes tracing back where or when the student heard of
Dianetics or
Scientology blows the trouble.
These points must be handled skillfully and rarely more than
once on any
occasion. Take it lightly and let the student win.
L RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ew.rw.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
206
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1969
Issue I
Remimeo
Supervisor's
Course
HOW TO TEACH A COURSE
Note: We learned these exact data the hard way over the years.
An empty
class with no enrollees is traced always to violation of these
points.
People like it this way. It makes auditors. The moment you
violate this
you have a clinic not a class and you wind up with no auditors
trained.
A Course should be taught very tough. The Supervisor's first
premise is
that a Student doesn't have a case. There is an old training rule in
Dianetics
and Scientology-if a mist forms on a mirror held up to the student's
mouth, he
can carry on. Never sympathise with a student, just train him.
THREE VITAL DATA
There are three vital data which make the difference between a
successful
course and one which fails utterly. They are
1. EXACT SCHEDULING.
2. SUPERVISOR PRESENCE.
3. SUPERVISOR REFUSAL TO ANSWER TECH QUESTIONS BUT ONLY REFERS THE
STUDENT
TO THE MATERIALS.
Exact scheduling means just that. The course has a daily
schedule, it is
known to each student, and it is adhered to exactly. The course
commences each
day and after each break exactly on time, with a brisk, snappy
rollcall. It is
ended exactly on time by the Supervisor.
The Supervisor must be present with the class at all times and
ON TIME.
Continuous inspection of what is going on, correction by referral to
the right
bulletin, and just being there as a Supervisor will bring about
trained
students.
The Supervisor should know the materials of the Course so well
that he
can refer students quickly and easily to the relevant material, when
asked
questions. When a student asks a question about a TR, this is answered
only
by reading the TR to the student from the Bulletin.
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS
Misunderstood words MUST be handled. HCO Policy Letter 26 August
1965,
HCO Bulletin of March 10, 1965 and the Study Tapes give the phenomena
and its
handling.
Tony Dunleavy
CS-2 Training Aide
LRH:TD:an.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Amended by HCO P/L 27 October 1970 Issue H, The Course Supervisor, in
the
1970 Year Book.]
207
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1969
Issue III
Remimeo
Diane tic
Supervisor's
Course
ENTURBULATIVE STUDENTS
The Supervisor on a course should not try to handle
enturbulative students
on a course. The vast majority of students are willing, eager to learn
and just
get on with it. Normal student difficulties in a well run course are
easily
handled by misunderstood word technology.
Send any enturbulative student either to Review (the Qual
Examiner) for
correction (but only if he says he wants a review) or to the Ethics
Officer for
ethics action. Note-the policy on Ethics handling of students and
gradient of
Ethics will be on the checksheet.
They should be returned to you when properly straightened up.
Failure to do this will invariably cause a complete disruption
of your
course and you to fail as a Supervisor. Don't neglect it. Get them off
the
course fast. Not to do so is to penalize the good students without
helping the
enturbulative ones either. Omission of this action betrays the whole
class.
Tony Dunleavy
CS 2 - Training Aide
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:td.cs.an.ei.kd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
208
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MAY 1969
Remimeo
Dn Checksheet
COURSE ADMINISTRATION
Usually, particularly with a large class-more than 18-the Course
Supervisor should have a COURSE ADMINISTRATOR.
The Course Administrator's purpose is TO HELP THE COURSE
SUPERVISOR
KEEP ALL BODIES CORRECTLY ARRANGED PLACED OR ROUTED AND TO KEEP ALL
COURSE
MATERIALS FOLDERS RECORDS CHECKSHEETS INVOICES AND DESPATCHES HANDLED,
FILLED
OUT AND PROPERLY FILED.
The essence, whether we have an Administrator or not is to:
Have adequate materials, packs, books and checksheets.
Issue what is needed promptly.
Demand what must be filled in promptly.
File precisely.
Keep the course comm lines (In and Out baskets) flowing.
Don't tolerate lack of materials, books, forms or make the
students "make
do" with less than needed.
Safeguard don't lose and keep neatly available all materials
records and
admin items.
---------
The Invoice system of a course is an item that has to be kept
in. If in an
org you don't find it in, you force it in.
The Course Supervisor receives a copy of the invoice enrolling
the
student. This is the student's "pass" to enter the course. It means he
has paid
and financial arrangements are finalized.
Without this you don't let the applicant on the course.
This saves several things and prevents heavy upsets. You can
actually
teach a whole course and then find suddenly it wasn't economical for
the org as
the Registrative end of it which is not in the Course Supervisor's
view, fell
down and no money or little money was taken in.
A student who isn't properly enrolled is a freeloader and has a
withhold
that prevents gain. Also, you will find that those who don't
contribute don't
value the course and you get enturbulation.
The Course Supervisor works hard, he suddenly finds he can't
have
materials or facilities or promotion because it isn't "economical". If
he has
his invoices he KNOWS how much is being made and can demand some
portion of it
to keep his course going or to get help for it.
The Course Supervisor can and should reject an N/C (No charge)
Invoice or
a "courtesy" invoice.
If he gets an award invoice he must insist that the awarding org
pay for
it even to himself.
The "withhold from salary" invoices are often not deducted in
fact and by
keeping track of these, the Course Supervisor can demand evidence
these sums
have been paid in.
Training makes the most profitable income of the org as it
requires the
least expenditure. An org can almost go broke doing only auditing.
It's training
that makes income for use. Auditing absorbs the income in overhead.
Yet training
gets the least facilities and supplies and help while being the most
important
income producer.
209
Money made in training students must also cover supplies, study
packs,
books, sufficient help, quarters, uniforms for Course personnel, etc.
Course
income should result in heavy expenditure on course promotion.
This is the way Dianetics and Scientology will spread-through
training.
A tightly scheduled, smartly run course is always full. It goes
empty the
moment it goes slack. This is a startling fact. People detest (by
years of
experience in orgs) a sloppy, permissive, badly disciplined Course run
with
inadequate materials and supplies.
You can say with certainty loud and clear that an empty course
has been
badly scheduled, the Supervisor not on deck on time, materials
lacking. The
moment these points get IN, the course fills up.
Excellent, neat admin is all part of a well run course. Things
filed,
marked up, issued smoothly and promptly. Students routed quickly,
gotten in
action.
NOTHING BACKLOGGED
That is the motto of a good course. Handle everything that comes
up NOW
and completely. Any backlog is death to smooth administration.
Be precise and definite, don't fumble around.
Absent students, late students, enturbulative students, you turn
the
matter over to Ethics at once. If Ethics doesn't handle right now, hit
the Exec
Council with "Where's Ethics?" You can't run a course and be the E/O
of the org
also!
All this applies even to a Gung Ho group.
Running a course is a GROUP action performed with at least a
rudimentary
org pattern backing it up.
A list of the current course materials papers and files should
be
furnished every Course Supervisor.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cs.an.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 JULY 1969
(Cancels HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 JAN 1969)
Remimeo
FAST FLOW TRAINING
Although Academy and Briefing Courses are taught on a fast flow
basis with
no examinations, students must apply HCO P/L 26 Aug 65, "SCIENTOLOGY
TRAINING
TWIN CHECKOUTS" on all star-rated materials of their level.
W/O Ira Chaleff
Chief Officer AO INT
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:IC:nt.ei.cden.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: HCO P/ L 28 January 1969 referred to above is in Volume 5, page
94.
HCO P/L 22 July 1969 has itself since been cancelled by HCO P/L 29
July 1972
Issue H, Past Flow in Training, in the 1972 Year Book.]
210
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 JULY 1969
Remimeo
Din Course
All Courses WHAT IS A CHECKSHEET
The "Checksheet" is a Scientology development in the field of
study.
A CHECKSHEET is a form which sets out the exact sequence of
items to be
studied or done by a student, in order, item by item, on a course. It
lists ALL
the materials of the course in order to be studied with a place for
the student
(or the person checking the student out in the case of a Starrate
Checkout) to
put his initial and the date as each item on the Checksheet is
studied, performed or checked out.
The Checksheet is the programme that the student follows to
complete that
course.
Every student is given a complete Checksheet at the start of a
course. It
is not added to after he has started working on it. It is in its final
form when
it is handed to him.
It may be added to for those who enroll later but is not added
to during
the course.
The data of the course are studied and its drills performed in
the order
on the checksheet. The student does not "jump around" or study the
material in
some other order. The materials are set out in the Checksheet in the
best order
for study by the student so that he covers all the material in logical
sequence.
Further, following the exact order of the Checksheet has a
disciplinary
function which assists the student to study.
The student's initial beside an item is an attestation that he
knows in
detail AND can apply the material contained in that bulletin, Policy
Letter or
tape, or that he has done and can do that drill. The initial of the
supervisor
or another student against a Starrated item is an attestation by him
that he has
given the student a Starrate checkout on the item in accordance with
HCO Policy
Letter of 14 May 1969 Issue II "How to do a Starrate Checkout" and
that the
student has passed.
The Course Supervisor MUST inspect students' checksheets daily
to ensure
that all students are following the Checksheet in its correct set out
order, and
that the student is making good progress through it.
"Through a Checksheet" means through the entire checksheet-
theory,
practical, all drills-and done in sequence.
When a course consists of three times through the Checksheet,
the student
goes through three entire Checksheets once, theory, practical and all
drills in
sequence, completing that, and then goes through the entire next
checksheet a
second time, then goes through a third checksheet fully a third time.
There is
no difference in what is studied and how it is studied the second and
third
times through-or any subsequent times through the Checksheet! It is
done fully
each time-theory, practical and all drills (including all study
drills).
RETRAINING
"Retraining" or "back to Course for retraining" or (per step [2]
in
handling a student who fails to get a good result-HCOB 16 July 69,
URGENT -
IMPORTANT) "Send student back to training" means that the student is
sent to
Cramming to get straight exactly what is missed and then back to
Course and does
THE ENTIRE COURSE AGAIN, three times through the checksheet if that is
the
course (such as the Dianetics Course). No short cuts or skimping is
allowed on
retraining, as a student who fails to apply one aspect of the course
had a
misunderstood which would have prevented him from fully grasping and
understanding the other material on previous times through the
Checksheet. Also-
NUMBER OF TIMES OVER THE MATERIAL EQUALS CERTAINTY AND RESULTS (a
major study
datum which has been proven beyond any question in Dianetics and
Scientology).
It is illegal to run any Course on any subject without a
checksheet in
Dianetics and Scientology.
Ens. Tony Dunleavy
LRH:TD.ldm.ei.rd Planning & Training
Aide
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
211
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1969
(Cancels HCO P/L 24 May 1969
Progress Board)
Remimeo
Dian Sup Crse
All Sup Crse
All Crse Sup &
Admin Hats
STUDENT PROGRESS BOARD
Every Dianetics and Scientology Course must have a Student
Progress Board.
The purpose of the board is to clearly indicate to Supervisor
and students
the progress each student is making through the course, whether he or
she is
making expected progress and any students which may need to be sent to
Qual for
correction such as Remedy B.
The Board has a column for each major cycle of action of the
course. For
the HSDC this would be one for each time through theory and practical,
one for
the pre-auditing exam, one for Auditing and one for final exam. See
sample
Student Progress Board below.
Each student's name is written on a small card, stuck in the
Board with a
thumb tack, and moved along to the next column as the student
progresses through
the course.
If the student does not keep pace with expected completions,
such as he
falls a week behind, a red slash mark is put on his card. If he falls
two weeks
behind schedule a second slash mark is placed on his card.
The Course Administrator keeps the Student Progress Board and is
responsible for its existence and condition. The Board must be posted
conspicuously for all to see. THE BOARD MUST BE KEPT UP TO DATE AT ALL
TIMES.
When a new student joins the course the Course Administrator
immediately
writes the student's name on small card and pins it up in the first
column. The
Administrator moves the students' cards along as they progress through
the
course and puts slashes on the cards as warranted. The Administrator
informs the
Course Supervisor if the board is indicating a student is not making
expected
progress, but the Supervisor himself must also frequently check the
Board and
take any appropriate actions.
Students undergoing retraining are on the Board with their names
on a
different coloured card, such as green for second time through the
course, blue
for third time, red for fourth time, etc.
ADMIN BASKETS
As a double check on student progress, a stack of eight baskets
is used.
They are marked as follows:-
1. One week.
2. Didn't complete materials in one week.
3. Two weeks.
4. Didn't complete materials in two weeks.
5. Three weeks.
212
This page contains a chart labeled "Student Progress Board"
Since charts are rather a pain to recreate in text files it
is not
included here.
See page 213 in OEC Vol 4, or see 00000235.tif in the web
released
version of Vol 4 for this page
213
6. Didn't complete materials in three weeks.
7. Auditing and exams.
8. Didn't complete auditing or exam.
Again students' names on cards are used, different colours for
retrain.
When a student has been on course for one week, the Administrator
places his
card in the "one week" basket, or (if he didn't complete his
materials) in the
"Didn't complete materials in one week" basket.
In the latter case, the student's card on the Progress Board is
red
slashed and the Supervisor notified so he can take appropriate action.
The Course Administrator keeps these baskets always up to date.
RECORD OF SESSIONS GIVEN
The Course folder Administrator is also to keep a posted list of
sessions
given by students. Each session is graded Well Done or Flunk as
indicated by the
Case Supervisor. The student too should keep this form as a record
which
indicates he has complied with the auditing requirements of the
course.
One sheet per auditor
STUDENT AUDITOR ____________________________ DATE
________________
AUDITING COMPLETIONS
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| | | ALLOTTED | HRS | GAINS OR | |
|
| DATE | PCS AUDITED | SPACE | AUDITED | MIRACLES | WELL DONE |
FLUNK |
|______|_____________|__________|_________|__________|_____________|___
_______|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
Ens. Tony
Dunleavy
Planning and
Training Aide
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:TD:cs.ei.aap
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
214
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 NOVEMBER 1967
(Revised and Reissued 18 July 1970)
Student Hat
Remimeo
ALL STUDENTS
ALL COURSES
OUT TECH
If at any time a supervisor or other person in an org gives you
interpretations of HCOBs, Policy Letters or tells you, "That's old.
Read it
but disregard it, that's just background data", or gives you a chit
for
following HCOBs or tapes or alters tech on you or personally cancels
HCOBs or
Policy Letters without being able to show you an HCOB or Policy Letter
that
cancels it, YOU MUST REPORT THE MATTER COMPLETE WITH NAMES AND ANY
WITNESSES
ON DIRECT LINES TO THE INTERNATIONAL ETHICS OFFICER AT WORLDWIDE. IF
THIS IS
NOT IMMEDIATELY HANDLED, REPORT IN THE SAME WAY TO YOUR NEAREST SEA
ORG MAA.
The only ways you can fail to get results on a pc are:
1. Not study your HCOBs and my books and tapes.
2. Not apply what you studied.
3. Follow "advice" contrary to what you find on HCOBs and
Tapes.
4. Fail to obtain the HCOBs, books and tapes needed.
There is no hidden data line.
All of Dianetics and Scientology works. Some of it works faster.
The only real error auditors made over the years was to fail to
stop a
process the moment they saw a floating needle.
Recently the felony has been compounded by disclosure of the
facts that
data and tapes have been deleted from checksheets, data has been
"relegated to
background" arid grades have not been in use fully to complete end
phenomena as
per the Process column on the Classification and Gradation Chart. This
caused an
almost complete unlock of the subject and its use. I am counting on
you to see
it is not allowed to happen EVER AGAIN.
Any supervisor or executive who interprets, alters or cancels
tech is
liable to the assignment of a Condition of Enemy. All the data is in
HCOBs or
Policy Letters or on tape.
Failure to make this mimeo known to every student carries a S 10
fine for
every student from which it is withheld.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright ($) 1967, 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The original issue appears in Volume 1,
page 472.]
215
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 JULY 1970
Issue III
Remimeo
All Orgs' ECs
Franchises
2nd Mate
Tech Sec
Tech Trg I/C TECH RETREADS AND RETRAINING
Course Sup (Amends HCO P/L 6 Dec '69 Issue V "Tech Retreads
and Retraining", which ordered a checksheet done
three times through after a flubbed session or
flunked exam)
Retreading is different than retraining.
RETREAD is brushing up one's study and knowledge and application
of Tech
on the course one is re-doing. It is a commendable action on one's own
determinism.
Any course already completed may be retreaded. The current
checksheet of
that course is done once through starrates starrated. The remaining
training
requirements as given in HCO Policy Letter of 10 July, 1970 "Training
Requirements Eased" apply.
RETRAINING is quite different in that where the student has
continually
flubbed sessions or Tech actions or flunked exams, it is assumed he
does not
have a grasp of the data.
The student is sent to or kept in the Department of Technical
Correction
where the situations of the student's knowledge of and application of
Tech are
established and the student is corrected with cramming and auditing as
necessary.
It is then established whether or not the student is retrained
on the
checksheet just completed and any earlier checksheets that may have
been
incompletely studied.
A retrain is done in the Department of Training, Div IV, for
Tech Div
Courses or in the Staff Training Unit which is in the Staff Training
and
Auditing Section, Department of Personnel Enhancement, Div V, for
Correction Div
Courses.
In retraining the student may be ordered to re-do the, full
requirements
of the checksheets or the whole checksheet only once starrate or only
a section
of the checksheet starrate, depending on the grossness of the goofs.
The Tech C/S, Tech See, D of T or any Course Supervisor may
order a
student directly to retrain on the checksheet the student is currently
studying
if the student is found to be flubbing auditing or Tech actions.
A Course Supervisor accepts a student for Retread or Retrain and
ensures
that the student completes the checksheet in accordance with study
data.
D/CS-5
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JF:rr.rd
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
216
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MARCH 1971
Re mime o
Course Super Cse
Course Super Checksheets
LRHComm to Enforce
WHAT IS A COURSE?
ln Scientology a course consists of a checksheet with all the
actions and
material listed on it and all the materials on the checksheet
available in the
same order.
"Checksheet Material" means the policy letters, bulletins,
tapes, mimeo
issues, any reference book or any books mentioned.
"Materials" also include clay, furniture, tape players, bulletin
boards,
routing forms, supplies of pink sheets, roll book, student files, file
cabinets
and any other items that will be needed.
If you look this over carefully, it does not say, "materials on
order" or
"except for those we haven't got" or "in different order". It means
what it says
exactly.
If a student is to have auditing or word clearing rundowns or
must do
auditing those are under ACTIONS and appear on the checksheet.
A course must have a supervisor. He may or may not be a graduate
and
experienced practitioner of the course he is supervising but HE MUST
BE A
TRAINED COURSE SUPERVISOR.
He is not expected to teach. He is expected to get the students
there,
rolls called, checkouts properly done, misunderstoods handled by
finding what
the student doesn't dig and getting the student to dig it. The
supervisor who
tells students answers is a waste of time and a course destroyer as he
enters
out data into the scene even if trained and actually especially if
trained in
the subject. The Supervisor is NOT an "instructor" that's why he's
called a
"supervisor".
A Supervisor's skill is in spotting dope-off, glee and other
manifestations of misunderstoods, and getting it cleaned up, not in
knowing
the data so he can tell the student.
A Supervisor should have an idea of what questions he will be
asked and
know where to direct the student for the answer.
Student blows follow misunderstoods. A Supervisor who is on the
ball,
never has blows as he caught them before they happened by observing
the
student's misunderstanding before the student does and getting it
tracked down
by the student.
It is the Supervisor's job to get the student through the
checksheet fully
and swiftly with minimum lost time.
The successful Supervisor is tough. He is not a kindly old
fumbler. He
sets high point targets for each student for the day and forces it to
be met or
else.
The Supervisor is spending Supervisor Minutes. He has just so
many to
spend. He is spending student hours. He has just so many of these to
spend so he
gets them spent wisely and saves any waste of them.
217
A Supervisor in a course of any size has a Course Administrator
who has
very exact duties in keeping up Course Admin and handing Out and
getting back
materials and not losing any to damage or carelessness.
If Paragraphs One to Three above are violated it is the Course
Administrator who is at fault. He must have checksheets and the
matching
material in adequate quantity to serve the Course. If he doesn't he
has telexes
flying and mimeo sweating. The Course Admin is in charge of routing
lines and
proper send off and return of students to Cramming or Auditing or
Ethics.
The final and essential part of a course is students.
If a course conforms with this P/L exactly with no quibbles, is
tough,
precisely time scheduled and run hard, it will be a full expanding
course and
very successful. If it varies from this P/L it will stack up bodies in
the shop,
get blows and incompetent graduates.
The final valuable product of any course is graduates who can
apply the
material they studied successfully and be successful in the subject.
This answers the question What is a Course? If any of these
points are out
it is NOT a Scientology Course and it will not be successful.
Thus, the order "Put a Course there!" means this P/L in full
force.
So here's the order, WHEN OFFERING TRAINING PUT A COURSE THERE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright ($) 1971
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The CONTENTS contain reference to a 26 January 1972 amendment
of this
policy letter. This amendment was cancelled by LRH in HCO Policy
Letter of 16
March 1972 Issue V, What is a Course - High Crime, "as not written by
myself and
is a false datum". While the reference has been left in the CONTENTS,
the above
text IS the original as written by LRH.]
218
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
copies to: HASI POLICY LETTER OF 10 APRIL 1957
Executives
Treasurer
Bulletin Board
HCO Washington STUDENT INTENSIVES
A student intensive and 8 weeks of training (two of which are
Indoctrination) are
included in the course fee for HPA.
This intensive on the student is done by a graduating HPA and
serves as
his final before full certification is granted.
The Director of Training, not the Director of Processing, is
responsible
for the fact of and the efficacy of this student intensive.
Any further auditing desired by the student should be purchased
from the
Registrar by the student possibly at the suggestion of the Director of
Processing or Indoctrination Instructor as indicated.
These student intensives included in the course are not done by
the
processing department by paid staff auditors.
The Treasurer has stated, on discovering that staff auditors
were being
used for this, that she will no longer pay staff auditors for such
intensives.
When staff auditors are without pcs for the week they should. be sent
to CF and
Procurement for full time procurement letters for the week.
LRH:rs.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
[Also issued as FCDC P/L 9 May 1957, same title.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 OCTOBER 1959
Convert to
Sec ED
PROCESSING OF ACADEMY STUDENTS
Academy students may not receive outside auditing while enrolled
in the
Academy to the level of HPA or higher.
Academy students directed by the Director of Training to receive
processing while enrolled under his instruction during any period of
the time
while so enrolled, even when taking Academy training a few weeks at a
time,
must receive their processing either in class from fellow students or
from
students under the direct supervision of Academy personnel or from an
HGC
Auditor working only for the HGC. Such students may not be given
auditing off
hours or on their own, time by staff auditors nor instructors, nor the
Director
of Training, but only as an assigned and duly enrolled intensive in
the HGC.
The purpose of this Sec ED is to protect the student, the
Academy, and
the HGC from various mishaps which have occurred in the past rendering
students
liable to loss of training time because of poor and unsupervised
auditing.
Violation of this Sec ED by a student can bring about at the
most
dismissal from the Academy, and at the least a delay of certification
of one
year, and for an instructor or other staff member for auditing such a
student
without proper registration, a loss of fifty percent of his units for
six
consecutive weeks.
LRH:js.cden.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959 Executive
Director
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
219
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER 1960
Re-issued from Sthil
Central Orgs
STAFF CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS
Any Staff Member who is not an HGC Auditor and who has case
histories to
complete for certificate requirements, may do auditing in the HGC on a
part-time
basis.
If their results are good they may submit these to HCO Board of
Review as
Case Histories.
This eliminates the necessity of taking on an outside preclear
for
certificate requirements.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH :js.gh.rd
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JANUARY 1962
Sthil
AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT
It is course policy that students of comparable time length on
course
shall audit one another and that students of incomparable time length
shall not.
This permits progressive training skill to manifest and blunders
to be
less apparent to the pc and more educational when made.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:sf.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: For further data on the assignment of auditors see HCO B 22
July 1969
Auditing Speed.]
220
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MAY 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
D of T Hat
IMPORTANT EXPLANATION
AUDITING RESTRICTIONS
The secret back of the No-Auditing Rule in Academies is that I
have found
the way to improve the average case quite well by study alone.
In the Scale of Awareness Levels, it is AWARENESS that
determines the
level, NOT Conduct. Conduct is dramatization and above the awareness
of the
person.
What can the person be aware of is the level determiner.
Thus by study matched to levels (the scale up from -34) you can
improve a
case just by making the person study the materials of the next level
above where he is.
Cases that don't so improve by study alone up to Grade IV would
have to be
processed and are too far down to be in an Academy anyway and so
should be
processed up to Grade 0.
The flatterer and rumour monger is not up to RECOGNITION as he
or she
hasn't a clue why we're here, much less what we're doing. They just
haven't
found the org or the auditor. So even Academy processing won't help-it
takes a
pro.
That's the riddle of why some students progress and some don't
answered.
Once a person has found the org and the auditor, study improves
cases
(level by level) more than Academy auditing would. Naturally HGC or
Review
Auditing could do it easily by processing. But not student auditing
student-they
are too aware the other one is a student, too critical, too immersed
in the idea
"it's all practice anyway," in Academy auditing.
So if the student is quite batty (as per TA tests) he won't make
it
without expert pro auditing and if he isn't he will usually make it up
to IV by
study alone. So why audit in an Academy.
Make future auditors instead.
The Academy is no substitute for an HGC for processing. And the
HGC is no
substitute for training. Get it?
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
221
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY AD15
Remimeo
Academy Students
Sthil Students
TECHNICAL DIVISION
DISTRIBUTION DIVISION
FREE SCIENTOLOGY CENTRE
Effective when ordered by the HCO Secretary in each org,
depending on when
the org is ready for it.
FREE SCIENTOLOGY CENTRE
Organize a Free Scientology Centre in your Dept of Processing.
This is not
the HGC. It is the student clinic. It is a section of the Dept of
Processing.
It is open evenings and weekends. It is run by students under
org
guidance.
No fee may be charged.
The org pays for and has on deck evenings and week ends the Free
Scientology Centre Registrar.
A sign is plainly displayed where every Free Centre pc can see
it.
THE FREE SCIENTOLOGY CENTRE
All auditing is done by student auditors.
It is unsupervised.
We only take responsibility for auditing done in our HGC by
professional
auditors.
The applicant for free auditing does so on his own
responsibility.
The results may be good but we cannot guarantee them. If you
want safe
auditing or are a rough case, buy your auditing in the HGC.
Place an ad in your local paper or display signs near your
public phone
box if papers won't take the ad:
FREE SCIENTOLOGY CENTRE
Free services offered the Community for Problems, increases in
Health and
IQ and Scientology Assists. Conducted as a Free Public Service by (org
name).
Call Free Scientology Centre Registrar (phone) or come to (address)
evenings or
week ends only.
----------
The pilot project on this was 1/3 of the applicants signed up
for courses
and intensives after Free Service where the auditing was good, without
being
urged to do so.
Every student with a certificate of any kind down to HBA can be
a Field
Staff Member. Remind the students they can select these applicants to
training
or processing.
222
Students doing their Provisional Classification Course are
compelled to
attend the Free Clinic each evening of their Classification Course and
only
leave if no applicants show up. They must be told to keep exact
auditor reports
of all they do as the Examiner will want them.
The Free Scientology Centre Registrar doubles in brass for all
evening and
week end services-Coaudits, BS (PE), HAS as well as paid service for
the HGC and
Academy evenings and week ends. If she becomes very busy give her
reception
service. Students can help her if they volunteer. They may not be
assigned
without volunteering as it cuts into their processing time. She must
get the
name and address of every Applicant and the Auditor Who picks him up
and turn
these into Address the next business day.
She need not assign student auditors. They should be on their
own and
should bring the applicant in to get him registered.
Auditing can be done in rooms as available.
There is no real effort here to do more than have students pick
up people
in the waiting room and get them registered and take them off to audit
them. It
is up to the student to make continued appointment. The student may
not accept
any gratuity of any kind. But the student if a field staff member, may
select
the person but only after at least an assist and a case gain.
Only standard processes of the student's study level or below
are run. No
effort need be made to follow the grade system on free pcs. Just get a
result
with standard processes.
There is no D of P work on free pc folders. There is only
Examiner work
and it is without advice.
A course (instructor) supervisor may use the free folders as
examples of
what to do and what not to do if so minded.
The Free Folders are picked up by the Examiner and sent to the
Dept of
Estimations on org lines for filing under the student's name, cross-
filed with a
card under the pc's name.
The legal attitude is "Well, you knew it was a student auditor".
Courts
uphold this.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mh.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 8 June 1970 Issue II, Student Auditing, page
227.]
223
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY ADI5
Issue II
General Non Remimeo
Not for Public Release Technical Division
ACADEMY PROCESSING
Applies to: All Academies and Saint Hill
You are out of the Processing Business effective as soon as the
current
students have completed the requirements of the level each is now on.
Academies don't process.
HGCs do.
Students up to 1952 never did auditing in their courses. They
audited raw
meat.
There is a firm basic policy about training. The student is
trained with
the tools he will use as an auditor.
This means even at Level Zero they have E-Meters in their laps
whether
they know how to use them or not.
This also means their practice auditing is a raw meat PC.
Where are students to get auditing experience? See Free
Scientology Centre
above.
Where do they get their own cases cracked? Students Can audit
other
students but only on their own initiative. Course Supervisors can see
if their
TAs and needles are awful and make them get auditing.
In Dianetics auditors didn't have cases. We audited an awful lot
of people
well. Since, Academy and course emphasis on cases is ruining your
training.
In the Classification Course (Practical) a student must show he
can audit
a pc so he can be pink sheeted. And that can be on another student.
But just for
show.
The Examiner, for final Classification Exams for every level
must require
Legible properly kept Auditor's Reports showing success with pcs on
the
processes of the level. Non-standard application or a false report
must be
reported by the Examiner at once to the Ethics Officer. This auditing
can be
done in the evenings of the (Practical) Classification Course and on
week-ends
on the Academy evening courses.
The best auditors we ever had were taught before students
auditing
students became a part of training.
The Dept of Training Trains. Coaudits, clinics, processing
belong to the
Department of Processing.
There is no more Course Auditing for the sake of another
student's case.
Auditors audit.
If a student's case gets in his way as an auditor (until you
have a full
Qualifications Division as is now formed at Saint Hill) he goes to the
HGC.
If he wants to coaudit, he can join the evening Coaudit at no
charge.
I have found out that a student's delay on course is usually not
for
theory and practical but because of auditing-auditing required because
of
student cases, not for student learning.
So that finishes Academies and courses as a place to go to get
audited.
It's where you go to get trained.
Let's turn out some eager beaver auditors! That audit!
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard [Cancelled by HCO P/L 8 June 1970
issue II,
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Student Auditing, page
227.]
224
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 OCTOBER 1965
Remimeo
Qual Div
Tech Div
Sthil Students
REQUIREMENTS FOR STUDENT CLASSIFICATION
HCO B of 27 September 1965 "Release Gradation." states "It is
obvious then
that GRADE CERTIFICATES FOR PRECLEARS lapse and are no longer issued
and are
replaced by Release awards, awarding 'Grade - Release' when attained".
HCO Policy Letter 31 July 1965 "Purposes of the Qualifications
Division"
states that the prime purpose of the Dept of Examinations and all its
sections
and units is:
"TO HELP RON ENSURE THAT THE TECHNICAL RESULTS OF THE
ORGANIZATION ARE
EXCELLENT AND CONSISTENT, THAT STUDENTS AND PRECLEARS ARE WITHOUT FLAW
FOR THEIR
SKILL OR STATE WHEN PASSED AND THAT ANY TECHNICAL DEFICIENCY OF ORG
PERSONNEL IS
REPORTED AND HANDLED SO THAT THE TECHNICAL RESULTS OF THE ORGANIZATION
CONTINUE
TO BE EXCELLENT AND CONSISTENT."
"The integrity of Scientology and its hope for beings in this
Universe are
entrusted to the Department of Examinations."
Because of the above it becomes necessary that students in
training
present their preclears to the Examiner to be declared at the grade of
Release
attained if a floating needle is attested by the student auditor. Even
if a
floating needle is not obtained students should still present their
preclear to
the Examiner for her to observe that good indicators are in on the pc.
Provision for this is made on the Night Foundation and in cases
where the
preclear works at night and cannot be presented to the Examiner,
special
representation may be made to the Examiner and the matter will be
individually
handled.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:mI.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
225
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 OCTOBER 1965
Remimeo
Students
Tech staff
STUDENT AUDITING OF PRECLEARS
Students may not audit any public preclear who is a preclear of
any
organization.
A student when looking for a preclear to audit for their
classification on
a level must first check with the preclear if they have been audited
by an
organization and if they have, they are not to be audited by the
student without
express permission from the organization concerned.
As the purpose of having students get preclears to audit on
their own
initiative is to teach them how to disseminate and reach into the
broad public,
it is hardly acceptable for them to reach Scientologists and will be
an
automatic disqualification for classification if this is found to be
the case.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 FEBRUARY 1967
Remimeo (Replaces HCO Policy Letter of
Students 29 October 1965 of same name)
Tech Staff
Qual Staff
STUDENT AUDITING OF PRECLEARS
Students may not audit for their Classification any current
preclear of
any organization or any preclear who has been audited in any
organization within
the past two years.
A student's preclear who does not fall into the above two
categories, but
who has had to have either an assist, a Review session, Or a
Stabilization
Intensive done in any organization due to the student classification
lines is
still considered the student's preclear and is not considered an
organizational
preclear.
A student may not audit another student's preclear without
getting a
written attestation from the other student that permission is granted
for the
preclear to be audited.
A student is held responsible for abiding by this policy.
Further the
technology, Ethics, and Policies as regards auditing of preclears
applies fully
to a student's auditing of his or her preclear.
Written by a Board of
Investigation:
Marilynn Routsong
Joan Thomas
Mary Sue Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jp.bp.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
226
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
ECs
Tech Sec HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 JUNE 1970
DTS Issue II
D of T
All Courses
Supervisors and
Students
(CANCELS HCO PL 29 Oct 65 Student Auditing of Preclears, HCO
PL
23 May 69 Issue II Dianetics Course Student Auditing, HCO
PL 17
May 65 Free Scientology Center, and HCO PL 17 May 65 Issue
II
Academy Processing.)
STUDENT AUDITING
The following policies regarding student auditing are made with
reference
to LRH ED 104 INT 2 Jun 70 "Only training gives low cost auditing from
fellow
students" and LRH ED 107 INT 3 Jun 70 "See that students do a lot of
mutual
auditing".
Students may not audit any public preclear. (Unfinished but
promised pcs
existing at this date of issue may be assigned to the student as a
Charity pc by
the Chaplain.)
Students may audit students who have been enrolled and who have
paid in
full for a Scientology level 0 or above or Dianetic Course. They may
also audit
contracted staff members and may be required to audit organization
preclears
under the D of P who are not enrolled on a course in order to complete
their
auditing requirements.
The course supervisor is to ensure that each student preclear's
folder is
C/Sed for each session to be given and that any needed folder error
summaries
are done.
The course supervisor must make the auditing requirements of'
students and
preclears known on a scheduling board so that student auditors can be
assigned
to preclears and sessions scheduled. Regular sessions may be scheduled
during
course hours besides any other mutually agreed upon time.
The Classification requirement for each level is that the
student
successfully audits several preclears to the attainment of the grade
of release
of the same level by auditing each of the many processes of the grade
to its end
phenomenon.
The auditor must produce consistent well done or very well done
sessions
on at least three preclears in which all standard tech for that grade
has been
exactly applied. Every effort must be made to see that the student
audits each
process of the grade.
Scientology course students may audit Dianetic Course students
on any
needed Scientology actions.
Any student auditing successfully for the Director of Processing
may be
given an honors class for the level.
A student who has honors for every level may be awarded an
honors final
certificate and the certificate clearly marked and permanent. He also
may be
awarded an Interneship for his highest class qualifying him as a C/S
for that
Class providing he also does the C/S checksheet well for that class
Interne.
Students not permitted to audit for the D of P and who otherwise
qualify
as students are awarded PROVISIONAL certificates made permanent only
after a
year.
Students may NOT audit local residents for classification and
the Free
Scientology Centre is not now permitted. They may of course audit
anyone after
graduation and if for fee, must charge at least as much as the full
org price.
They may of course, if qualified, audit friends and family free of
charge.
This does not prevent the Chaplain or D of' P from assigning
charity cases
to students at the discretion of the org.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dz.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Modified by HCO P/L 4 November 1971 Issue II, Academy Prerequisite,
in the
1971 Year Book.]
227
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo
Org Exec Sec WW HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 APRIL 1966
ES Comm Tech WW
ES Comm Qual WW
Org Exec Sec Hat
Tech Sec Hat DIANETIC AUDITORS COURSE
Qual Sec Hat The Org Exec Sec WW has
Dir Reg Hat the authority to arrange
and order and issue check
sheets for Dianetic Auditing
Training
For any arranging or establishment of a Dianetic Course as per
HCOB 3
April 1966 "Student Auditing Dianetic Auditing" the following must be
observed:
1. The course must be not less than one month.
2. It must not be extended endlessly for the student.
3. It is not the same as grade courses in that it does not contain
grade
material or even the gradation chart but contains Dianetic data.
4. It must remain precisely within the limits set by HCOB 3 April
1966 so far
as its auditing is concerned.
5. It may not be sold as a course for less than $500 in the US or
�125
sterling in the UK or other continental areas.
6. Scholarship up to 50% may be issued.
7. Only cash may be accepted and no credit allowed.
8. Healing laws must be given heed by not selling such auditing or
promising
to heal by reason of Dianetic auditing.
9. The course may be advertised as, paraphrase, the way up to a
capable human
being is the realm of Dianetics-Scientology reaches from a
capable human
being upward. Success in Scientology is assured by a thorough
grounding in
Man's most advanced school of psychology (or the mind)-
Dianetics.
Dianetics was the ultimate development of the mind of human
beings.
Scientology is the road from there to total Freedom. This is a
study and
practice course which is a prelude to becoming a Scientology
auditor and
brings one a complete understanding of the mind so that one is
then
prepared to understand the spirit in Scientology, etc.
10. Academies and especially Saint Hill may teach and practice HCOB
3 April
1966 as part of Level 0 providing it is studied along with the
other
materials and forms the practical of Level 0.
At this writing there is no pattern of how to include this
material and
one must be developed by experience. But it is pointed out that
Academies have
never failed to do well so long as a one-piece Dianetic type course
was
available.
It could be that experience, cautiously won, will show that the
public
will buy the Dianetic course in droves.
It could be we should drop the Dianetic word from Dianetic
techniques as
refined in HCOB 3 April 1966, as they are really pretty awfully
advanced from
where we were in 1950 and call it the Basic Auditor's Course or the
Basic
Academy of Scientology Course and call the technique Basic
Scientology. If so,
texts will have to be edited and Scientology substituted everywhere
for
Dianetics.
These problems are left to the Org Exeo Sec WW as they will
gradually
evolve into a new success.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
228
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 AUGUST 1966
Issue II
Remimeo
Important
DIANETIC AUDITING
Dianetic Auditing is being re-introduced for TRAINING ONLY.
In all publications or announcements this fact must be included.
Dianetics is known as a healing mental science and as such,
announcement
of its use could be interpreted as an entry into healing by
Scientology
organizations.
Dianetic Auditing may NOT be offered for sale in Hubbard
Guidance Centres
or by Centres. It may be offered as a training course in auditing by
Franchise
Holders, Centres and Orgs but ONLY by making the statement in every
announcement
that it is to train auditors and is not part of Scientology practice.
Dianetic auditing demonstrates mental anatomy to students and
improves
their auditing skill. Scientology practice is today too fast to permit
training
as an auditor to be sufficient to qualify them.
Its re-introduction in no way enters orgs into the field of
healing
despite the fact that healing does occur in Dianetic auditing.
The insane belong to the psychiatrist and we as a reform group
only wish
he would clean up his practice and get his practitioners to act
ethically, and
actually help his patients.
The sick belong to the medical doctor and as a social group we
only wish
he would advance his science to include workable psychosomatic
medicine.
We are not interested in the insane or the sick and refuse to
take them in
Centres and orgs. We are only interested in freeing the human spirit
from
materialism and making the able more able.
Dianetic auditing is not for sale or use by centres or orgs. Use
of it is
instructional only. Any benefit is incidental even if sometimes
considerable.
Dianetics was and is the answer to psychosomatic illness but we
in
Scientology are not in the field of healing.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
229
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1967
Remimeo
All Students
Tech Sec Hat
D of T Hat
Dia Course Supervisor Hat
Qual Sec Hat
Dir Exams Hat
Dir Rev Hat
DIANETIC AUDITOR'S COURSE
AUDITING POLICY
Queries have been received as regards what Grades of preclears
can be
allowed to have secondaries and engrams run on them in relationship to
the
Dianetic Auditor's Course.
Preclears with no Grade or Grades 0 to III can be run on
secondaries and
engrams.
Preclears with a Grade IV can be run on engrams.
Preclears with Grades V, VA and VI are not to be run on
secondaries or
engrams. The only exception is when a Dianetic Release state is found
to be
missed at a later date, but this is not normally handled by course
students.
Org Exec Sec WW - Fred
Hare
D.O. Tech WW - J.J.
Delance
Mary Sue Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
230
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 FEBRUARY 1968
Remixneo
Dianetic Course Students
DIANETIC AUDITOR'S COURSE
AUDITING POLICY
The following Grades of preclears can be allowed to have
secondaries and
engrams run on them by Dianetic Auditor's Course students.
Preclears with no Grade or Grades 0 to III can be run on ARC
S/W,
secondaries and engrams.
Grade IV Preclears can only be run on engrams.
Preclears with Grades V, VA and VI are not to be run on ARC S/W,
secondaries or engrams, other than by Internes or above, when a
Dianetic Release
state is found to be missed at a later date. This is never handled by
course
students as they have not been trained on the Technology of Power and
Power
Plus.
Proposed by a Board of
Investigation
Mo Budlong
James Hare
Mary Sleight
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:jc.rd The Guardian WW
Copyright ($) 1968 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 JANUARY 1969
Remimeo
Dianetic Course Students
DIANETIC AUDITOR'S COURSE
AUDITING POLICY
HCO Policy Letter, "DIANETIC AUDITOR'S COURSE-AUDITING POLICY",
23 FEB
1968 is hereby cancelled as it introduces an arbitrary into Standard
Tech.
Proposed by: R.C. Ash
D/Tech Sec
SH
Approved by: Jane Kember
The
Guardian WW
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ei.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
231
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 APRIL 1969
Remimeo
DIANETICS
The policy on Dianetics is that it was and is intended to make a
happy,
well human being and that it can now be used in conjunction with
purely medical
(not political psythiatric) treatment.
Any person not recovering his health and sense of well being by
use of
Dianetic auditing should be given by competent medical and clinical
doctors or
technicians a thorough physical examination to locate the illness,
structural or
pathological (disease), which is troubling him and introverting him.
Scientology healing and mental treatment policies apply to
Scientology.
Dianetics is fully excepted from these policies.
This is in view of the strong and increasing interest and
cooperation of
individual medical doctors over the world which should be continued
and
promoted.
This policy does NOT include turning any person over to
institutions or
practitioners engaged in political treatment and expressly does not
allow the
use of such political treatment as electric shock, lobotomies, brain
"operation"
or drugs producing convulsions.
This policy does permit surgical and structural operations
including the
alleviation of concussion or skull fractures or the removal of brain
tumors but
only after they are proven to exist beyond any doubt by competent
clinical
examination. It does not include exploratory operation.
The severance of nerves to "end psychosis" is expressly
condemned and
the use of produced convulsion by any means to "alleviate psychosis"
and the
practice of euthanasia (mercy killing) or any barbaric torturous or
murderous
or terrifying treatment or approach are not only not condoned but
should be
actively fought due to the non-therapeutic results, the immediate or
early
demise of the "patient" and to the efforts to use these "treatments"
to effect
political ends. The persons using these means actively financed and
fought
Dianetics and Scientology over the world and were the sole source of
repression
of a valuable sincere and vital breakthrough in the field of healing
as
consistently demonstrated.
This HCO Pol Ltr amplifies as policy HCOB 6 April 1969 and HCOB
12 March
1969.
Dianetics is a healing practice supplementing medical treatment.
Scientology is a religious practice applying to Man's spirit and
his
spiritual freedom.
In areas, mainly America, where the freedom to heal is subject
to
attempted monopoly, all Dianetic auditing of physically ill persons
(not as
student practice) must be in conjunction with competent medical
practitioners
who must be informed why a medical examination is requested for the
preclear.
"This is a member of the Church of Scientology. As he may be
physically ill we
wish a full medical examination and diagnosis and any medical
treatment which
will resolve the illness found. With the leave of the medical doctor
and with
the patient under his care we will employ Dianetic auditing as well to
assist
his recovery. Until healed this person is not eligible for Scientology
auditing.
We cooperate fully with the medical profession and expect in our turn
that our
trust in it will not be betrayed. Under no circumstances will we
permit this
person to be brutalized with psychiatric political treatments."
In other countries any variation of this statement or its lack
may be employed, depending on the legal position of healing.
LRH:cp.ei.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
232
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dianetic
Course
Qual Secs
Tech Secs
DIANETIC COURSE EXAMINATIONS
There are two examinations on the Dianetics Course.
1. PRE-AUDITING EXAMINATION.
This is done after the student has completed the theory and
practical
drill sections of the course. The examination is standard and
has been
written up and issued to all Qualifications Divisions in Orgs.
It must be
passed 100% before the student is permitted to audit.
As Dianetics is now a very standard routine it will be found
that the
student either understands it or he doesn't. There are no shades
of grey.
If the student flunks the examination he goes to Cramming to
review the
materials of the course.
2. FINAL EXAMINATION.
This is done after the student has completed his auditing
requirements.
When the 25 hours of auditing are complete (or more if required
to obtain
the required result), the student presents all his auditing
folders to the
Examiner with an attestation that he was the auditor, and that
all the
sessions he audited have been recorded in the folders presented
to the
Examiner.
The Examiner inspects the folders to see if the auditor has
demonstrated
the practice of Standard Dianetics and to see if the PC has
attained the
expected gains. (If the sessions look standard but the PC has
not attained
the expected gains the examiner knows the session reports are
incomplete
or false.)
If the Examiner is satisfied the student is auditing 100%
Standard
Dianetics the student is passed and graduated.
If the auditing is non-standard and the results have not been
obtained the
student must continue auditing until the Examiner is satisfied.
The student auditor's sessions are case supervised. If the PC is
in
trouble the auditor ends the session and sends the PC to the examiner.
The case
supervisor orders the student to cramming if he has goofed.
The PC may be ordered to a Scientology Review such as a Green
Form.
Review and cramming are at normal Org rates. There is no charge
for case
supervision.
Brian Livingston
LRH:BL:cs.ei.rd CS-5
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 29 July 1972 Issue II, Fast Flow in Training, in
the 1972 Year Book.]
233
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1969
Issue III
Remimeo
Dianetic
Course
AUDITORS CODE AND DIANETICS
The Auditors Code (HCO Policy Letter 14 October 1968) applies to
Dianetic
auditing as well as Scientology.
Clauses I and 2 (Evaluation and Invalidation) especially must be
thoroughly understood. The Dianetic student must be able to
demonstrate these
with many different examples of each and should even write an essay on
all the
ways he can possibly think of evaluating for and invalidating a PC.
Clauses 12, 13, 15 and 24, are sometimes misinterpreted by
improperly
trained Dianetic auditors who are not too familiar with what they are
handling.
The clauses do apply but the following notes are made:
12. I PROMISE TO RUN EVERY MAJOR CASE ACTION TO A FLOATING NEEDLE.
In Dianetics you are auditing chains to ERASURE. Erasure of a complete
chain is
normally accompanied by a F/N. The handling of a lock is not in itself
a major
case action and may or may not produce an F/N.
13. I PROMISE NEVER TO RUN ANY ONE ACTION BEYOND ITS FLOATING
NEEDLE.
In Dianetics you do cease an action on an F/N. But, if the F/N is on
one
incident and the chain is not erased you just cease to run that
incident but
continue on down the chain to erasure.
15. I PROMISE NOT TO MIX THE PROCESSES OF SCIENTOLOGY WITH OTHER
PRACTICES
EXCEPT WHEN THE PRECLEAR IS PHYSICALLY ILL AND ONLY MEDICAL.
MEANS WILL
SERVE.
As Dianetics concerns the body, Medical and Dianetic practices may
proceed
together. Whenever possible you would cease medical treatment during
auditing
but sometimes the medical treatment can only be eased off gradually.
With
accidents and acute illness medical treatment must be given
immediately and the
engram can only be audited when the PC has somewhat recovered. In some
instances
the PC will Only respond to correct medical treatment after a Dianetic
assist
has been given.
You never mix Dianetics or Scientology with any psychiatric, occult,
mystical,
hypnotic, or other practices.
24. I PROMISE NOT TO ADVOCATE SCIENTOLOGY ONLY TO CURE ILLNESS OR
ONLY TO
TREAT THE INSANE KNOWING WELL IT WAS INTENDED FOR SPIRITUAL
GAIN.
The improvement and freedom of man as a spiritual being is the vital
realm of
Scientology. Dianetics erases those things (Locks, Secondaries, and
Engrams)
which make a person susceptible to, and hold in place, physical
illness. Hence
Dianetics, while not treating illness or insanity directly, does enter
those
fields. When a person is no longer troubled by unwanted physical
conditions he
can then advance on the much wider field of spiritual gain and freedom
covered
by Scientology.
The use of F/Ns in Dianetics and the relation between a
Dianeticist and
the medical practitioner is fully covered in other materials of the
Dianetics
course.
Brian
Livingston
LRH:bl.an.ei.rd CS-5
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
234
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 MAY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dianetics
Course
Tech Division - Qual Division
STUDENTS GUIDE TO ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR
(Edited for the Hubbard Standard Dianetic Course)
GENERAL
1. Get sufficient food and sleep. Always eat breakfast before class
and
morning sessions.
2. When being a preclear, be one, not a student or auditor. When
being an
auditor, be an auditor, not a student or preclear. When in class
and
lectures, be a student not an auditor or a preclear.
3. If you don't know something or are confused about course data,
ask a
Supervisor or send a despatch. DO NOT ASK OTHER STUDENTS AS THIS
CREATES
PROGRESSIVELY WORSENING ERRORS IN DATA. Also despatches from you
to L. Ron
Hubbard will be relayed if you place all such in the basket
marked
"Students Out".
AUDITING
4. Do not consume any alcoholic beverage between 6 a.m. on Sundays
and after
class on Fridays.
5. Do not consume or have administered to yourself or any other
student any
drug, antibiotics, aspirin, barbiturates, opiates, sedatives,
hypnotics or
medical stimulants for the duration of the course without the
approval of
the D of T.
6. Do not give any processing to anyone under any circumstances
without
direct permission of the D of T. (Emergency assists excepted.)
7. Do not receive any processing from anyone under any
circumstances without
the express permission of the D of T.
8. Do not engage in any "self-processing" under any circumstances
during the
course at any time.
9. Do not receive any treatment, guidance, or help from anyone in
the healing
arts, i.e. physician, dentist, etc., without the consent of the
D of T /
Ethics Officer. (Emergency treatment when the D of T is not
available is
excepted.)
10. Do not engage in any rite, ceremony, practice, exercise,
meditation, diet,
food therapy or any similar occult, mystical, religious,
naturopathic,
homeopathic, chiropractic treatment or any other healing or
mental therapy
while on course without the express permission of the D of T /
Ethics
Officer.
11. Do not discuss your case, your Auditor, your Supervisors, your
classmates,
L. Ron Hubbard, ORG personnel or the ORG with anyone. Take up
any
complaints with your supervisor.
12. Do not engage in any sexual relationships of any nature or kind
or get
emotionally involved with any classmate who is not your legal
spouse.
13. Follow the Auditor's Code during all sessions when being the
Auditor.
235
14. Follow technical procedure as outlined on the course exactly and
precisely.
15. Be honest at all times on your auditing report form. Stating
every process
run, Tone Arm changes and times, sensitivity setting, cognitions
of your
preclear and any changes of physical appearance, reactions,
communication
level, or otherwise what you observe in your preclear.
16. Place all reports in the folder of your preclear after each
session, turn
it into the Examiner for examination.
17. Students must not read their own report folder or that of
another student,
unless he is auditing that student.
PREMISES
18. Do not make any undue noise either indoors, or when leaving
class.
19. Use the correct entrances for entering and leaving the premises.
QUARTERS
20. Do not put cigarettes out in plastic waste baskets or on the
floors.
21. Keep all your bulletins, supplies and personal possessions in
the space
allotted to you and keep your space neat and orderly.
22. Students are allowed to smoke during breaks only and always
outside any
study or auditing quarters.
23. The basket marked "Student In" is the basket where all
communications,
bulletins or mail to students are placed. Always check this
basket daily
to see if you have received any communications.
24. Report and turn in any damaged property or goods used on the
Course.
Protect and keep the premises in good condition.
25. No food may be stored or eaten in the Classrooms at any time.
SCHEDULES
26. Be on time for class and all assignments.
27. Buy any books you need from the bookstore at appointed times.
28. Follow all schedules exactly.
29. Study and work during your class periods and over weekends. You
have a lot
to get checked out on in order to get a course completion. You
can't
afford to waste time.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:emp.cs.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
236
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 MAY 1969
Issue II
Dianetic Course
HUBBARD STANDARD DIANETICS COURSE POLICY
1. The checksheet of the Hubbard Standard Dianetic Course as
contained in HCO
Policy Letter of 7 May 1969 Issue I may not be altered without
the
authorization of L. Ron Hubbard.
2. The course time should not exceed one month.
3. The price of the course is S500 in the US or �125 sterling in
the UK or
other Continental areas. This includes the Supervisor's Section.
4. Only cash may be accepted and no credit allowed.
5. The Standard Dianetic Course may only be taught by Standard
Dianetic
Supervisors. Qualification is graduation from the HSDC and the
Supervisor's Course.
6. The HSDC may be taught in any official Scientology Organization,
Franchise
Center, or Gung Ho Group by a QUALIFIED PERSON.
7. In order to maintain the standard, students may only be examined
in an
official Scientology Organization, the Qualifications Division
of which is
authorized to issue the Standard Dianetic Certificate.
8. This course may not be taught as part of any other course.
Tony
Dunleavy
LRH:TD:cs.rd CS-2
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 19 May 1969, Hubbard Standard Dianetics Coarse
Policy, page 241.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
FAST FLOW BY ATTESTATION
The Standard Dianetics Course is taught by the Fast Flow System.
This
means that Students are not required to be checked out by another
person, the
exceptions being only those bulletins which have drills especially
designed for
their study, as contained in HCO Bulletins.
The student does however have to attest that he knows each
bulletin or
policy letter on the Checksheet in detail and that he is able to apply
it. This
is done by signing each item on his own Checksheet when he has studied
it.
Further, a student may work with another student to be sure he
knows it.
In this case, HCO Policy Letter of 26 August 1965, "Scientology
Training-Twin
Checkouts", should be followed, except that the student still attests
on his own
Checksheet for each item.
There is a Pre-auditing Examination as well as a Final
Examination.
Tony
Dunleavy
LRH:TD:cs.an.rd CS2-Training
Aide
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 29 July 1972 issue II, Fast Flow in Training, in
the 1972 Year Book.]
237
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
RED ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MAY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dianetics
Course
TEACHING THE DIANETICS COURSE
As the teaching of basic data restimulates confusions which are
then
dramatized by throwing the course off line, the teaching of the
Dianetics Course
as follows is hugely vital.
The teaching of Dianetics Auditors is laid down on these simple
principles.
1. The data on tapes and Bulletins is studied without alter-is,
interpretation or addition by the student, fellow student,
instructor or
supervisor.
2. Well done and other folders are studied by the individual
student.
3. No lecturing or additional interpretation or evaluation by
Supervisors.
4. The student audits only when he has completely passed on I and 2
above. He
must not audit before he has completed his checksheet three
times through.
5. Things the student is weak on are done in clay.
6. The student is sent to cramming at his own expense for bad
auditing goofs.
He may also be taken off auditing and made to do his checksheet
again.
7. Any student question is answered by referring to the HCOB,
folder or tape
or by explaining it is beyond the scope of Dianetic auditing.
8. A rigid invariable schedule is precisely adhered to.
9. Checksheets and tapes and folders are gone through in the
sequence laid
down by the checksheet and not randomly Out of sequence.
If this is made difficult then the programme must be cut back to
the bare
bones of the original above.
The teaching of standard tech must also be standard. Therefore
the above
MUST be adhered to completely.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.an.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
238
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1969
Issue IV
(Revision for Standard Dianetics
Course of HCO PL of 22 Nov 67)
Remimeo
Student Hat
All Students
All Courses
OUT TECH
If at any time a supervisor or other person in an org gives you
interpretations of HCOBs, Policy Letters or tells you, "That's old.
Read it
but disregard it" or gives you a chit for following HCOBs or tapes or
alters
tech on you or personally cancels HCOBs or Policy Letters without
being able
to show you. an. HCOB or Policy Letter that cancels it, YOU MUST
REPORT THE
MATTER COMPLETE WITH NAMES AND ANY WITNESSES ON DIRECT LINES TO THE
INTERNATIONAL
ETHICS OFFICER AT WORLD WIDE.
The only ways you can fail to get results on a pc are:
1. Not study your HCOBs and my books and tapes.
2. Not apply what you studied.
3. Follow. "advice" contrary to what you find on HCOBs and Tapes.
4. Fail to obtain the HCOBs, books and tapes needed.
There is no hidden data line.
All of Dianetics and Scientology works. Some of it works faster.
Any supervisor or executive who interprets, alters or cancels
tech is
liable to the assignment of a Condition of Enemy. All the data is in
HCOBs or
Policy Letters or on tape.
---------
Failure to make this mimeo known to every student carries a 10
fine for
every student from which it is withheld.
L RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.an.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
239
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 MAY 1969
Dianetics Course Issue II
Sup. Section
HOW TO DO A STARRATE CHECKOUT
Earlier forms of education suffer because of a habit. The habit
was
contracted in one's years of formal schooling where this mistake is
the whole
way of life.
If the student knows the words, the teacher assumes he knows the
tune.
It never does a student much good to know a few data. In life
one succeeds
only if he can USE facts.
It is so easy to confront thought and so hard to confront action
that the
teacher often complacently lets the student mouth words and ideas that
mean
nothing to the student.
ALL THEORY CHECKOUTS MUST CONSULT THE STUDENT'S UNDER STANDING.
If they don't, they're useless and will upset the student
eventually.
Course difficulties stem entirely from the student's non-
comprehension of
words and data.
So examining by seeing if somebody "knows" the text and can
quote or
paraphrase it is completely false and must not be done.
Correct examination is done only by making the person being
tested answer
(a) The meanings of the words (re-defining the words used in his own
words and
demonstrating their use in his own made up sentences), and
(b) Demonstrating how the data is used.
The Supervisor can ask what the words mean. And the Supervisor
can ask for
examples of action or application.
A Starrate Checkout must have been 100% right answers for a
pass. However
the following rules apply-
1. Spot check the words and materials, do not try to cover it all.
This is
done the same way a final examination is given in schools; only
a part of
the material is covered by examination, assuming that if the
student has
this right the student knows all of it.
2. Flunk on Comm lag in attempts to answer. If the student "er
ah
well ," flunk it as it certainly isn't known well enough to
use.
(Doesn't include stammerers.)
3. Never keep on examining a bulletin on the same exam after a
student has
missed.
THE GLIB STUDENT
You will find that often you have very glib students you won't
be able to
find any fault in who yet won't be able to apply or use the data they
are
passing.
Demonstration is the key here. The moment you ask this type of
student to
demonstrate a rule or theory with his hands or the paper clips on your
desk this
glibness will shatter.
The reason for this is that in memorizing words or ideas, the
student can
still hold the position that it has nothing to do with him or her. It
is a total
circuit action. Therefore, very glib. The moment you say "Demonstrate"
that word
or idea or principle, the student has to have something to do with it.
And
shatters or passes.
Clay Table isn't used by a Theory Examiner. Hands, a diagram,
paper clips,
these are usually quite enough!
Compiled from earlier policy
letters by
Tony Dunleavy
LRH:TD:an.ei.rd CS2-Training Aide
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
(Cancelled by HCO P/Ls 20 January 1971, Checkout Mini Course, and 5
March 1971
of same title (which cancelled and replaced 20 January 1971), in the
1971 Year
Book.)
240
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 MAY 1969
(Cancels HCO PL 7 May 1969
Issue II Same Title)
Remimeo
Dianetic
Course
HUBBARD STANDARD DIANETICS
COURSE POLICY
1. The checksheet of the Hubbard Standard Dianetic Course as
contained in
HCO Policy Letter of 7 May 1969 Issue I may not be altered
without the
authorization of L. Ron Hubbard.
2. The course time should not exceed one month.
3. The price of the course is $500 in the US or �125 Sterling or
equivalent
in the UK and South Africa and the equivalent of �l50 Sterling
in ANZO.
This includes the Supervisor's Section.
4. Only cash may be accepted and no credit allowed.
5. The Standard Dianetic Course may only be taught by Standard
Dianetic
Supervisors with a Hubbard Dianetic Graduate Certificate.
Qualification is
graduation from the HSDC including the Supervisor's Section.
6. The HSDC may be taught in any official Scientology Organization,
Franchise
Center, or Gung Ho Group by a QUALIFIED PERSON.
7. Students may take their Pre-auditing examination at the
Franchise Center
or Gung Ho Group at which they do the course. Org Qual Divisions
are to
supply copies of the examination to Franchises and Gung Ho's who
run the
HSDC, which are confidential. However, in order to maintain the
standard,
the students' requirements for certification must be examined by
the Qual
Examiner of an official Scientology Org. This may be done by
mail, by the
Franchise or Gung Ho sending to the Org Examiner the full
Auditing
Reports, Worksheets, Pc Examiner forms, etc (i.e. the students'
preclears'
folders) of the students' auditing on the course showing that
the auditing
requirements of HCO Bulletin of 6 April 1969 Issue II have been
met by the
student, as well as his checksheet attested by the student as
completed.
The pc folders will be returned to the Franchise or Gung Ho
Group after
examination.
Only the Qual Div of an official Scientology Org is authorized
to issue a
Hubbard Dianetic Graduate certificate. It must be promptly sent
to the
student upon his passing the Final Examination.
8. This course may not be taught as part of any other course.
Tony
Dunleavy
LRH:TD:an.ej.rd CS-2
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Note: This issue of Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course Policy differs
from the
7 May 1969 issue in its inclusion of more detailed data (especially in
points
3,5 and 7).]
241
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 MAY 1969
Remimeo
HUBBARD STANDARD DIANETICS COURSE
COURSE MATERIALS PAPERS AND FILES
(referred to on HCO P/L 16 May 69)
STUDENT REQUIREMENTS
Each student enrolling on the HSDC is required to have the
following:
BOOKS Original Thesis
Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental Health
Evolution of a Science
The Book Introducing the E-Meter
The Book of E-Meter Drills
MATERIALS E-Meter
2 Soup Cans for electrodes
E-Meter lead with jack plug and crocodile clips
1 eraser
1 pencil
blank paper
2 black or blue pens
1 good dictionary
1 timepiece
Worksheets
Auditor Report Forms
Stapler
Paper clips
Clay (various colours)
Demonstration kit (box of assorted bits and pieces for use
in
"demonstrating")
Good picture frame for his certificate
ORG REQUIREMENTS
The following is a checklist of materials, files and papers
needed for
the HSDC.
Check them off and make sure you have adequate quantities of
every item.
Always reorder in sufficient time those materials which are used up,
such as
student packs of materials, so that you never run out.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS
1 Thick hard cover foolscap size book for roll book
_____________
1 Thick hard cover foolscap size book for student auditing record
_____________
1 Master Checksheet kept up to date
_____________
1 Pack of materials kept up to date
_____________
1 Schedule made up and posted clearly
_____________
1 HSDC students' notice board
_____________
Thumb tacks
_____________
1 Student progress board (described separately)
_____________
1 Student statistic board
_____________
242
File cabinet
____________
Pens
____________
Stapler
____________
Staples
____________
Paper clips
____________
Ruler
____________
Felt tip pens
____________
Stock of orange coloured PC folders (Or other different colour to
that regularly used in the Org for PC folders)
____________
Routing forms:
New students
____________
Student to examiner
____________
Student to ethics
____________
1 IN basket for each student
____________
1 OUT basket for whole course
____________
1 Basket TO LRH
____________
COURSE MATERIALS
Adequate supplies of checksheets
____________
Adequate packs of course materials (for issue one to every
student)____________
Adequate copies of LRH Case Supervised Sessions
____________
Weekly Student report forms to LRH
____________
PC Assessment forms 24/4/69 (HCOB)
____________
Pastoral Counselling form 24/4/69
____________
Summary Report forms 17/3/69 (HCOB)
____________
Parent and Guardian Assent Forms
____________
Sufficient copies of "Alice in Wonderland" books
____________
Pink sheets
____________
TAPES
21 July 1966 Dianetic Auditing
____________
28 July 1966 Dianetic Auditing and the Mind
____________
18 June 1964 Study, Introduction
____________
9 July 1964 Study, Data Assimilation
____________
4 Aug 1964 Study, Summary of
____________
6 Aug 1964 Study, Gradients & Nomenclature
____________
11 Aug 1964 Study, Evaluation of Information
____________
13 Aug 1964 Study and Education
____________
22 Sept 1964 Study, A Review of
____________
18 Aug 1966 Study and Intention
____________
SUPERVISOR MATERIALS
1 Desk (in the training room)
____________
1 Chair
____________
1 IN-OUT basket
____________
1 Stapler
____________
Paper
____________
Pens
____________
Ruler
____________
Clipboard and carbon paper
____________
Very large dictionary
____________
Demonstration kit
____________
GENERAL COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Large photo of LRH in course room
____________
Sufficient space for class at all times (large quiet well lighted
room)
243
Folding chairs (one for each student)
____________
Folding card tables (one for each student pair)
____________
Adequate number of good quality tape recorders
____________
Tape head cleaning fluid (alcohol) and cotton buds (for regular
cleaning of tape heads)
____________
HiFi headphones (the type with miniature speakers as the
earpiece not the telephone type)
____________
Supervisor's certificate posted very visibly
____________
CERTS AND AWARDS
Hubbard Graduate Auditor certificates
____________
Dianetic PC lapel pins
____________
BOOKSTORE
The bookstore should get in adequate quantities of books listed
above
under student requirements.
Blazer badges
____________
Lapel pins
____________
W/O Ken Delderfield
LRH Public Aide CS-
6
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:KD:an.ei.aap
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The titles of the tapes listed have been corrected per HCO P/L
23
Oct '70.]
244
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
RED ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 MAY 1969
Remimeo
Dian Checksheet
KEEPING DIANETICS WORKING IN AN AREA
In that any Dianetics Course, starting out, has only its Course
Supervisor
trained, the problems of what is used for Case Supervision and
Cramming
Supervisor in Qual will arise.
Here more than any other points, alteration can enter.
Altering, doing something else, is a sufficiently serious
problem to
destroy a Course and all the benefits of Dianetics in a whole area.
Early on, during the development of the Standard Dianetics
Course, we were
suddenly getting case failures. These were traced by Case Supervision
to wild
variations from Standard Dianetic procedure. These variations were
traced to an
examiner who during student checkouts was giving "advice". As soon as
this was
handled, case gains immediately resumed.
Over the many years of Dianetic use, I think we must have seen
all
possible variations of auditing. "New" phenomena were often discovered
and used
and eventually the whole subject wandered off into never-never land
and ceased
to produce uniform results.
What has happened here in Standard Dianetics is that the exact
actions
that produce results on all cases have been isolated and used as THE
procedure.
The procedure is a thin narrow walk way through a huge field of
potential
alterations.
THERE ARE NO DIFFERENT CASES.
Built in to the Standard Dianetic procedure are the remedies.
For instance early Dianetics was plagued by several problems:
1. Lack of visio-an inability to see pictures. This was solved by
getting
date and duration.
2. Perception shut off. Not required in total now to produce
results. Sonic,
ability to hear the sound in pictures, is not needed at all.
Impression is
sufficient.
3. Somatic shut off. Not now required to be solved but its source
(drugs and
alcohol) have been discovered.
4. Rough sessions. Solved by TRs.
5. Lack of auditor judgement in diagnosis. Solved by the E-Meter.
In these years of research I have been able to wrap up these and
other things.
There have been more cases run on Dianetics than could easily be
counted.
So the research data is very broad. This is no new subject. It has
been close to
39 years under research.
Thus what you are told on the Standard Dianetics Course is the
essence of
all this
245
work and experience. There are no unsolved problems, there is only
varied
application where there should not be.
The whole object of the course is to train people to get good
RESULTS, and
train people to give a course that results in GOOD AUDITORS. That's
the whole
thing.
We could also teach over 50,000,000 words about things that
don't get
results or train auditors.
The essence of a brilliant subject is a simple subject.
Therefore anything that varies the data of a Standard Dianetics
Course can
send it out into unworkability.
I've seen auditors also use "peyote" (a drug), CO2 and drugs "to
help
auditing". I've seen many different meter types used. I've looked over
a
thousand different ways to run a session. And I've seen all these
things fail.
The four points of greatest potential failure are
1. A Course Supervisor who interprets data and alters it in order
to satisfy
some student's offbeat quest.
2. An Examiner who throws curves into data by means of invalidating
the right
data.
3. A Case Supervisor who does not simply and only put the auditor
back onto
the main line and who seeks to "solve" cases by altering data.
4. An Auditor who, not knowing his data in the first place, alters
the data
and, because in an altered form he fails, starts off on a wilder
alteration of data and fails harder.
Under Supervisor comes the course and cramming supervisor both.
So you see, that to get real Standard Dianetic results going in
an area
you have to be very alert to hold the exact data line as contained in
the HCOBs.
Where you begin to find case failures, look to I to 4 above and
to student
failure to just simply study and drill.
For the first time you have an exact subject in the field of the
"humanities". These "humanities" for all man's history have been a
mass of
superstition, bad logic, propaganda, authority and brutality. An exact
humanity
is so new that it has a bit of a hard time. All the errors and
prejudices start
to "blow off" when truth enters in.
Just be sure you don't lose the subject with the confusion.
Cope, make do, hold the line and you'll have a successful
Dianetic area.
It's worth working toward, worth achieving.
You have only one big stable datum.
IF IT ISN'T WORKING IT IS BEING VARIED.
To get it working again, find who and what is varying it and get
back on
the main line.
LRH:an.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
246
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MAY 1969
Remimeo
Dianetics
Checksheet DIANETIC CONTRACT
Div 6
This form is a standard offering and promotion form for
preclears for
Dianetic Auditing.
DIANETICS
FULL REFUND IF YOU DO NOT GET WELL THROUGH AUDITING.
Anyone accepting this offer must also agree to receive if
required a
medical examination and any effective treatment for any entirely
medical illness
he may have both before and after auditing.
The extent of the refund will consist of the exact fee paid.
The claim for refund must be made within three months of the
conclusion of
the auditing.
If the fee is refunded no more Dianetic or Scientology auditing
or
training may be given to the person.
Medical illnesses which beforehand could not be cured medically
usually
respond to medical treatment after some auditing.
Auditing after such medical treatment tends to stabilize the
medical cure
and prevent relapse.
A standard release form covering these points must be signed by
the
applicant.
Some large percentage of Man's physical ills are psychosomatic
and respond
directly to auditing.
Only auditing done by Hubbard Dianetic graduates in official
organizations
are covered by this offer.
WHY BE TIRED?
WHY BE IN PAIN?
WHY FEEL BAD?
AUDITING CAN MAKE YOU FEEL WELL AND HAPPY WITH LIFE. OUR
ORGANIZATIONS ARE
FRIENDLY. THEY ARE ONLY HERE TO HELP YOU.
-----------
These points above are to be included as additional clauses in
our release
forms.
IF ANYONE EVER DEMANDS A REFUND UNDER THIS OFFER make him or her
sign an
undertaking never again to purchase training or processing and A
RECEIPT IN FULL
and GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY BACK ON A MINUS INVOICE AT ONCE. Do not make
a long
argument out of it or a long drawn out Admin action.
By paying these claims quickly, getting the promise not to have
more
auditing or any training and getting a receipt YOU ACTUALLY BUILD
CONFIDENCE.
It is fully understood that this campaign applies to DIANETICS.
Trying to sell Scientology to make physical health has been a
betrayal of
Scientology. The subject that made bodies well was and always has been
Dianetics. Scientology increases ability and gives one immortality.
Refunds for
Scientology services are governed by the older policies which remain
in force.
-----------
The first line, FULL REFUND IF YOU DO NOT GET WELL THROUGH
AUDITING, can
be posted in any display space. If so, a small printed complete
leaflet as
written above should also be displayed so they can get all the facts.
Persons asking about this should be handed the leaflet.
New additional leaflet should also be available and handed out
at the same
time:
DIANETICS
Dianetics (Dia-through, noos-mind) has been 39 years in development.
It is the
first fully precision science of the mind.
247
Physical illness, aches, pains, continual exhaustion, body
malfunctions
are created or held in an unchanging state by the mind. This is called
psychosomatic (psycho-spirit, somatic-body) illness. It has been known
about for
a century but there has never been a positive remedy before Dianetics.
Auditing (it means to listen) is a term given to the application
of
Dianetics.
No drugs, no hypnotism, no mechanical treatment is used.
The actual source of psychosomatic illness has been isolated in
Dianetics.
Processing is the action of an auditor letting the preclear
(person not
yet cleared) find the actual source of his physical illness.
Processing requires usually 25 hours or less.
---------
Various forms of mental therapy were in existence before
Dianetics. These
were psychology, psychiatry and psycho-analysis.
Psychology and psychiatry were developed chiefly by a Russian
veterinarian
named Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849-1936). His basic principle was that
men were
only animals and could be conditioned and trained much like dancing
bears or
dogs. This work was only intended to CONTROL people and so has found
great favor
with certain rulers and upper classes. None of the activities of
psychology or
psychiatry were designed to help or cure, only to Control the masses.
Psycho-analysis was developed by an Austrian Jew Sigmund Freud
(1856-
1939). His occasional successes served to point out that there was a
possibility
of solving psychosomatic illness through addressing the mind. His
concentration
on sex gave the subject considerable popularity.
Dianetics was first released in 1950 and has been increasingly
successful
since that time. Unlike earlier studies, the interest of Dianetics was
the
relief of physical suffering.
The results of psychiatry are physically damaging, consisting of
various
brutalities and often injure the patient for life or kill him
outright. There
have never been any cures listed or claimed for psychiatric treatment
as its
interest lies only in control. The cost is about $2000 a month often
for years
in America and �60 a week for as long as a decade in England.
Psychology is mainly used for testing aptitude or intelligence.
It has
counseling as part of its activities but it is more concerned with and
financed
for warfare.
These two subjects have bitterly contested any healing subject
and use
public media governments and even rumor to forward population Control.
This
action has often made it difficult to bring bonafide mental health to
the
people.
Psycho-analysis requires up to five years for an uncertain
result and
costs about �9000.
Dianetics requires only a matter of hours, only helps and does
not
physically injure anyone. It costs about $25 an hour in the US and
about �50
total processing cost in the UK.
There is no quarrel between Dianetics and general practitioners
of the
medical profession. They both have the same purpose (to make people
well) and
are not political. It is freely admitted in Dianetics that physical
illness that
can be effectively treated medically should be so treated. Auditing
will not set
a broken leg or deliver a baby. But it can help get the leg healed in
two weeks
instead of the usual six and after effects of childbirth do not exist
when
Dianetic auditing is also used.
Many people who cannot work, who cannot enjoy life, are
physically ill
without realizing it.
Aches, pains, colds, even malfunctions of the body are symptoms
of
illness.
See the Registrar.
(address) _____________
Variations of the central ideas of these themes may be used.
But remember, Dianetics is pastoral Counseling and all HDGs must
be
ministers. Psycho-somatic means spirit-body. Look up "psyche" in the
dictionary
and you'll see.
LRH:an.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
248
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MAY 1969
Remimeo
Dianetics
Course
PROGRESS BOARD
The purpose of this board is as follows:
1. It shows the names of the students on the course. It's a
vertical column
on course list.
2. It shows their progress according to their checksheet
completions-
horizontal column.
It must be kept up to date. The Supervisor or the course
Administrator,
where the class is large enough to warrant one, enters the names of
new
students.
Upon completion of each section the student makes the checks
(ticks) on
the Progress Board.
Upon completion of the course each section has three checks in
its column-
books one check.
Keynotes of the Progress Board are:
1. It is drawn up according to the checksheet sections.
2. It is kept in order by the Administrator.
3. Each section is checked by the student upon immediate
completion.
4. It must be kept up to date and replaced, periodically. Send to
be filed
when taken down.
Students returning from cramming take up where they left off
having been
corrected on the specific outness for which they were sent to Cramming
Div V.
The Supervisor regularly observes this board as it is a valuable
indicator
of fast students and those students who should be routed to cramming.
Supervisor's Section follows this layout.
The Progress Board is posted conspicuously and open to view for
anyone to
see.
249
Progress Board Graphic
Since graphics are a pain
to recreate in text format
this page has been omitted.
See page 250 in OEC Vol 4
or see Vol 4 00000272.tif
in the webbed version of
the OEC set.
250
Record of Sessions Given
The Administrator is to keep a posted list of sessions given by
students.
Each session is graded Well Done or Flunk as indicated by the Case
Supervisor.
The student too should keep this form indicating he has Complied with
HCOB
6.4.69 Issue Il-Dianetics Auditing Course Requirements.
One sheet per auditor
STUDENT AUDITOR ____________________________ DATE
________________
AUDITING COMPLETIONS
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| | | ALLOTTED | HRS | GAINS OR | |
|
| DATE | PCS AUDITED | SPACE | AUDITED | MIRACLES | WELL DONE |
FLUNK |
|______|_____________|__________|_________|__________|_____________|___
_______|
LRH:JB:an.ei.rd W/O James Byrne
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 30 July 1969, Student Progress Board, page 212.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MAY 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dn Course
DIANETICS COURSE STUDENT AUDITING
Policy on the Dianetics Course is that students may audit other
students
on the same course, but only upon assignment to audit that student by
the Course
Administrator. It is expected .that all Dianetics Course students will
complete
the Course after having significant gains on Standard Dianetic
auditing.
This modifies the policy for the Dianetics Course ONLY that
students may
not audit other students.
The policy that students may not audit any public preclear who
is a
preclear of any organization is also modified for the Dianetics Course
ONLY as
far as other students on the Course are concerned.
Dianetics Course Students will of course have to also audit pcs
who are
not on the course to complete their requirements, in which case the
above policy
DOES apply in that such preclears may not previously have been pcs of
any
Scientology Organization.
NO DIANETIC PROMOTION MAY PROMISE OR INFER BECOMING CLEAR BY
DIANETIC
AUDITING. THE END PRODUCT OF DIANETICS IS A WELL BODY AND A CHEERFUL
ATTITUDE
TO LIFE.
Tony Dunleavy
LRH:TD:an.ei.rd CS-2
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 8 June 1970 Issue II, Student Auditing, page
227.]
251
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MAY 1969
Dian Course
Sup. section
DIANETICS COURSE SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION
SUPERVISOR CHECKOUTS
CLAYDEMOS
Clay demos are done by the student at his own table or at the
Clay Table.
The student raises his hand when he is ready for a checkout. The
supervisor
comes over and gives a checkout as per HCOB 11 Oct 1967 "CLAY TABLE
TRAINING".
All demos must be checked out in accordance with this HCOB.
TRAINING DRILLS
The training drills are checked out, with the Supervisor being
"the
coach".
If student flunks Supervisor has the student coach drill him on
the TR
some more telling the student coach what the student flunked on.
E-METER DRILLS
The Supervisor is to closely supervise E-Meter drills, making
sure they
are done correctly.
(On Dianetics Course E-M Drills 23 & 26 are *checked out.)
SELECTION OF TWINS
One of the duties of the Supervisor is the selection of twins.
The main object in selection of twins is to team up students of
comparable
ability. SLOW students of course are sent to the Examiner for Review
or
Cramming. Poor case gain students are sent to the Examiner suggesting
"GF to F/N
and no 4OGF and handle". (One Cannot order Qual but one can suggest.)
You just have to work it on trial and error for the first couple
of days
until you get an idea of how fast the students are.
Twins should remain twins for the duration of the course in so
far as
possible and are responsible for each other's progress.
COURSE AUDITING ADMINISTRATION
Part of the duties of the Course Administrator are:
1. KEEPING A FULL RECORD OF WHO'S AUDITING WHO.
(a) No. of sessions
(b) Auditor's name
(c) PC (or pre OT's) name
(d) Dates of each session
(See HCO Pol Ltr 24 May 69 "Progress Board", Record of Sessions
Given.)
2. Scheduling preclears to auditors.
3. Making sure all auditing reports, work sheets and Summary
Reports are
written legibly or written over neatly by the auditor using a
different colored
pen.
4. Making sure all folders are intact ready to go to Case
Supervisor.
5. Having folders easily accessible and in alphabetical order so
they can be
quickly obtained.
The Course Administrator must make available any folder the Case
Supervisor or Student Auditor requests.
Michael Mauerer
Dianetics Course
Supervisor
Sea Organization
LRH:MM.an.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
252
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JUNE 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dn Supervisor's
Course
DIANETICS TRAINING
A datum has emerged which is vital to Dianetics training and to
the whole
forward advance of Dianetics and Scientology.
A COURSE SUPERVISOR WHO DOES NOT KNOW HIS COURSE
MATERIALS TO THE POINT OF BEING ABLE TO INDICATE WHERE
IN THE MATERIALS ANY DATUM CAN BE FOUND WILL EVALUATE
FOR AND GIVE DATA TO THE STUDENTS.
Further students will have extreme confidence in the Supervisor
who can
and does direct them to the exact Bulletin section or paragraph where
they will
find the answer to their tech questions, or which they need to study
further.
Therefore on any Supervisor's Course, the student must be
drilled and is
expected to know his materials by Bulletin and paragraph. He must know
his
materials backwards as well, as Study Materials and supervision
technology.
The Text Book for any course must be compiled by subject, and
paragraphs
numbered. There must be an Index by Terms, giving all the page numbers
these
terms are used, with any page on which they are defined in heavy
print.
There are two Dianetics Courses.
HUBBARD STANDARD DIANETICS COURSE.
On this course the student is trained to be a highly competent
Standard
Dianetics auditor. It is a thorough course, taught tough, and to
graduate the
Student must have gotten excellent case gains himself and on his
preclears. He
graduates by reason of excellent examination marks and well done
sessions.
The certificate for this course is the HUBBARD DIANETIC
COUNSELOR
CERTIFICATE. The Graduate of this course is NOT qualified to teach an
HSDC.
The second course is the
HUBBARD DIANETIC SUPERVISOR COURSE.
This course requires that the student knows his Dianetics Course
materials
so well that he can point to anything in the materials.
He must also know thoroughly the Study Material and Supervision
Technology.
The Hubbard Dianetic Supervisor Course is taught only in
Official
Scientology Organizations, and. is very tough with lots of drilling.
The student
graduates as a HUBBARD DIANETICS GRADUATE and he, and only he, is
authorized to
teach a Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course or a Hubbard Dianetics
Supervisor
Course.
A Dianetics Counseling Group should have a Hubbard Dianetics
Graduate as
only then may it conduct and run a Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course.
And it
must hold a Franchise to do so.
It should send in to an official Scientology Organization its
best
Standard Dianetics auditors to be trained on the Hubbard Dianetics
Supervisor
Course.
Tony Dunleavy
Planning & Training
Aide
LRH:TD:cs.ei.rd for
Copyright ($) 1969 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
253
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 JUNE 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
Dianetic Course
Checksheet
LEGAL STATEMENT CONCERNING DIANETICS AND
MEDICAL PRACTICE LAWS
Dianetics is a science. It is not Scientology. In the hands of a
medical
practitioner who is also a trained Dianeticist, Dianetics 'may achieve
remarkable results in the handling of many of the problems and
ailments which
make up' a large part of ordinary practice. It does not infringe upon
orthodox
curative medicine for known physical ailments. In this context
Dianetics may be
called 'treatment' and be said to 'cure'.
In the hands of a priest or minister who is also a trained
Dianeticist,
the same tool has a different use and function. It is used as a
technology of
pastoral counselling. It is then not used to treat and to cure in the
medical
sense, but to handle the effect of the spirit on the body. Dianetics,
after
examination, treatment, cure and a clean bill of health, as necessary,
by a
medical doctor, is used as a tool by the minister to free a person's
attentions
from his body so that he is ready for Scientology. It is thus true
pastoral
counselling and has a religious function.
Dianetics as a subject taught on the Hubbard Standard Dianetics
Course can
be promoted in any authorized way. The teaching of Dianetics cannot be
excepted
to. But promotion of the practice of Dianetics as a treatment for the
sick or
afflicted or as a treatment for blemishes, deformities, diseases,
disfigurements, disorders, injuries or other mental or physical
conditions, by
other than medical doctors, will violate the medical practice laws
where they
exist and lead to trouble.
Hence the importance of controlled promotion, of sending sick
pcs to a
medical clinic for examination, for emphasizing that pastoral
counselling is a
use of Dianetics and is a religious use with the purpose of handling
the effect
of the spirit on the body and not a use which conflicts with the
proper sphere
of the medical doctor as' laid down in medical practice laws.
That is not to say that Dianetics is a religion. It is not. It
is a
science, but it has a religious use-to free the spirit from bodily
considerations. Such problems of the spirit are not the function of
the medical
doctor, nor the concern of the medical practice laws.
A proper adherence to the distinction between promoting
Dianetics the
science taught on the Dianetics Course, and Dianetics the pastoral
counselling
technology practised by Ministers of religion, will resolve any
problems posed
by medical practice laws.
Proposed by Charles
Parselle
Legal
Chief W/W
Approved by Jane
Kember
The
Guardian W/W
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:ei.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
254
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
RED ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JUNE 1969
Remimeo
Dianetic
Supervisor's
Course
DIANETICS
POINTS WHICH GO OUT AND WRECK PCS
These are the points which regularly go out on a course and
wreck it.
They are vital points which must be policed and kept in. You can
almost take it
on the basis that if student auditors wreck any pcs these points are
out and
MUST be put in fast to save the repute of Dianetics, the Course, org
and area.
1. A student must not be permitted to audit until he has passed a
tough
written examination with a grade of 100%.
2. When a student flunks his auditing or examination he or she re-
does the
whole checksheet fully (three times through). If a Qual Cramming
section
is available with a trained Dianetic Cramming Supervisor the
student,
after flunking, goes to Cramming, gets his misunderstoods, etc.
handled
and then does the checksheet through three times.
3. When the student re-does his checksheet he must be checked out
again on
the bulletins and drills as though he had never done the Course
before. Do
not check him out, on only those bulletins he flunked on or
misapplied.
4. The person who says "it is all an overrun" (when made to restudy
the
materials) usually hasn't studied his materials in the first
place.
5. LRH case supervised folders must be available and properly
studied on
course and on any retraining.
6. All materials must be available to the student. The course is
compact and
meaty. The student cannot graduate (or audit) without having
checked out
on all bulletins at least three times. Crossing an item off the
checksheet
as 'not available' is not permitted. The Course Administrator
must ensure
all materials are available.
7. A student must be shown and must study all the C/Ses of his
sessions
before auditing another session. He must be checked out for
understanding
of the C/S instructions of each before auditing another session.
If this
is not done he will repeat errors already corrected by the C/S
but not
known to him.
8. Any new bulletins issued and designated for the Dianetic Course
must be
issued to the students and checked 'out and must be" added to
checksheets
for new students. New bulletins are issued because (a) an
important new
aspect of the technology has been developed by Ron or (b) the
bulletin is
required to correct an outness persisting in the application of
the
technology. In either case it is vital for students to have the
data and
to be able to apply it.
9. The Supervisor must not give Tech data to the student-even if he
does know
it verbatim. He must only refer the student to the materials. If
your
students are auditing satisfactorily for a period and then the
sessions go
on the rocks, auditors who were previously doing alright start
doing goofy
things, you can be certain somebody is giving Tech data. That is
the time
to call in Inspections and Reports or the Ethics Officer to do
an
Investigation and find out WHO. The most likely person is the
Course
Supervisor, the Examiner, the Cramming Officer, or some
255
other 'technically knowledgeable' person. It may be one of the
students or
it may be that the students are permitted to get their Tech data
from
other students.
10. The Course must be tightly scheduled, starts, breaks and end of
day being
very precise.
11. The course must be closely supervised, the supervisor there on
time and
there during the course, with no other org duties, and an
adequate number
of supervisors and administrators must be on staff when the
course gets
too large to be handled easily. Large courses are broken down
into sub-
units.
These are the points which, if permitted to fall out, will wreck
your
course and your pcs. We have already seen these points go out several
times on a
closely watched course. It is quite insidious and is immediately
reflected in
goofball auditing that drives a Case Supervisor nuts.
Tech Secs, Qual Sees, and Case Supervisors must be alert to see
that the
Course Supervisor gets these points in and keeps them in before all
your
Dianetic pcs wind up in Review.
Brian Livingston
CS-S
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:BL:fas.ei.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
256
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 JUNE 1969
Remimeo
DIANETIC REGISTRATION
(Revises HCO Policy Letter of April 6, 1969 Issue II
Mainly in reference to Paragraphs two, seven and ten)
A sign should be prominently displayed in all orgs servicing the
general
public as follows:
"If you have come here to be cured of a physical illness, SEE
THE
REGISTRAR and so inform her so that she can arrange for a competent
medical
examination and treatment and for Dianetic auditing while under the
care of a
doctor. When you are physically well, you can begin Scientology
training and
processing on your road to total freedom."
And another sign,
"This organization will not recommend or condone political
mental
treatment such as electric shocks or brain operations or convulsive
drugs and
condemns utterly this Fascist approach to 'mental health' by
extermination of
the insane. Because we will not agree to brutality and murder under
the guise of
mental healing or to the easy and lawless seizure of persons in the
name of
'mental health' for political reasons, we are fought ceaselessly by
those who
seek domination of this country through 'mental treatment'. You are
safe so long
as we live."
The registrar is to sign the person up as he or she would any
preclear.
The org must make, a liaison with a medical clinic which has
diagnostic
equipment and obtain a flat rate charge.
Legally and ethically it is all right to send a person to a
doctor for a
physical examination, but it will cause an ARC break with the doctor
to specify
what he is to do in that examination.
It is best to say merely: "Would you please do a complete
medical
examination to include any acute or chronic illness and any effects
from past
injury or illness."
It should be made clear to the medical doctor who pays his fee.
"Your fee
for this examination and for any special investigation will be paid by
the
bearer."
It should end by saying, "Would you please give a note of your
findings to
the bearer."
Note that it would be unethical for the medical doctor to treat
any curable
disease found unless the person examined specifically asked him to
treat it, other-
wise he would refer the person to his own doctor.
A doctor cannot be asked to supervise a person while he is
having auditing
because he cannot professionally be asked to join in a non-medical
attempt to
cure some illness, for if he did he would be subject to discipline,
charged with
"covering", and if found guilty, struck off the Medical Register.
The org should make their position very clear to the clinic-that
they are
trying to co-operate with the medical profession and that Scientology
is a
religion. However, after or in the absence of medical treatment if
none is
needed, the persons sent will be given Dianetic auditing after such
medical
examination and treatment, if given, or under medical [supervision]. A
clean cut
difference should be made between Dianetics as an assist done under a
physician's care or after his treatment and Dianetics as a religious
function of
pastoral counselling or Scientology as a religious practice.
If contempt or hostility is met, write a letter of complaint to
the
medical
257
association and try another doctor or clinic. In such a letter of
complaint make
it very plain that you are not engaged in physical healing, that you
have always
tried to co-operate with medicine and that your Only quarrel is with
psychiatric
casualties and their perversion of the medical profession.
If the clinic shows clear cut evidence of the need of an
operation, the D
of Processing should give the preclear the verdict. If the preclear
will not
have it, arrange a meeting between the preclear and the doctor and
discuss it.
It is possible to engage in Dianetic processing even when a
medical
verdict is for an operation, but if the preclear will not have it,
then
undertake Dianetic processing only under the doctor's care and with
his consent,
and insist upon the preclear being re-examined during processing.
The cost of the examination and any operation is in addition to
processing
fees and any such charges are paid directly to the clinic by the
preclear, the
org not taking responsibility for the costs of these.
After any medical treatment, the entire treatment is run as an
engram or
chain as the first action. Lingering symptoms are also run down to
their basics
as per Dianetic Auditing Assists given in the Dianetic Course.
Policy is not to engage on auditing sick pcs without medical
advice or
treatment as required.
Insane pcs are handled in this same fashion as they are mainly
physically
ill, need rest and no harassment. Insane pcs are a lot of trouble
unless One has
an institution to hand, but institutions cannot be trusted. Until an
org has
some means or connection by which the insane preclear will not be
brutalized,
shocked or operated on with brain "operations", it is better to refuse
them.
By insane pc is meant one who is subject to highly irrational
and
destructive behavior. If not, they are regarded as physically ill.
The senile and mentally retarded are also handled as per
physically ill
pcs as above.
Waivers in all cases are required.
A new clause, "Will not hold the organization or its principals
responsible for medical costs or errors", must be included in signing
persons up
for Dianetics.
Complete files of all such should be kept in Division 6 to show
in case of
need
(a) that the org does not engage in physical healing and
(b) success stories with full records, X-rays, etc for
Dianetics.
Where this policy letter is fully in force, earlier policies on
healing
and the insane are cancelled.
This change of policy is due to (1) our wish to cease to
individuate from
the other social groups of the society and (2) our refusal to leave
the field of
mental healing in the hands of public enemies.
This is also part of our campaign to Revitalize Western Society.
"A well
society is a sane society."
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:fas.ei.cden Founder
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The word "principles" has been corrected to "principals" in the
fifth
last paragraph, per HCO PL 2 September 1969, Issue III, Correction to
HCO FL
12 June 1969.],
258
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor. East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 JUNE 1969
Remimeo
Examiners
DIANETICS
PRE-AUDITING EXAMINATION
Confidential HCO Policy Letter of 5 May 1969 Pre-Auditing
Examination
is cancelled.
The pre-auditing examination consists only of a tough written
examination
which must be passed 100% before the student is permitted to audit.
After a period the current written examinations will become too
well
known, also some students may flunk the exam several times before
eventually
passing with 100%, hence more examinations will need to be written
from time to
time. These should be originated as necessary by the Qual Sec WW or,
under his
direction, by some competent person who is a Dianetic Graduate.
All examinations must consult the student's understanding and
ability to
relate the materials to a session. '
Sometimes a student will get high marks in the nineties and only
lost
marks for an incomplete answer rather than incorrect answers. In such
cases the
examiner after marking the paper can verbally ask the student the
questions on
which he lost marks. If the student then gives the missing data,
without having
referred to the materials or discussed the examination with somebody
in the mean
time, he passes.
This Opportunity is not given if the student answered any
question
incorrectly, or had less than about 94% on first marking.
The purpose of the examination is.. to find out if the student
knows and
understands the materials cold. If he doesn't he will mess up cases.
The student who flunks the examination or auditing goes to
Cramming and
then back to course to re-do the full course.
THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF THIS EXAM IS TO PREVENT THE MESSED UP PCS
WE FIND
OCCURRING WHEN THIS QUALIFICATION TO AUDIT EXAM IS OMITTED.
Brian Livingston
CS-5
for
LRH:BL:eky.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ICancelled by HCO P/L 29 July 1972 Issue II, Fast Flow in Training, in
the
1972 Year Book.]
259
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
RED ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JULY 1969
Remimeo
Dianetics
Supervisor's Course
SUPERVISION
A Course Supervisor can give himself, and his students, losses
by becoming
too careful. The Supervisor being over anxious and harassing all his
students to
graduate without flunks can unwittingly bring about slow cautious
students. This
extends course time and the mode is carried over into auditing. The
students
then become slow cautious auditors. An auditor who, in session, is
being careful
not to flub, not to violate any tech datum or policy will not have his
TRs in,
will not have the PC in session and will flunk his auditing.
Dianetics is a fast simple course. It is not complicated.
The majority of students will fly through the course in two to
three weeks
of full time study. If they don't the supervisor has probably gotten
too
cautious and inadvertently slowed the course down.
It happens several ways. For example: A student goes into
auditing and
then flunks. The supervisor feels responsible for not having trained
the student
adequately. He then takes up the student auditor's flunks' with the
whole class
and has them all star rate check out on the bulletin so they won't
make the same
mistake. Another example is the supervisor who goes anxious about the
few slow
students on course. He feels he is failing as a supervisor to have any
slow
students so starts spending much of his time coaching, checking out,
and
handling the few. It awards a down stat. This is done to the detriment
of the
majority of fast students. The supervisor should simply twin, the slow
students,
have them work together using a dictionary and checking each other out
on the
materials. When they really know the data the supervisor checks them
out on
their star rate materials. He doesn't spend a lot of time with them.
If they
just can't make the grade he routes them off to Qual for Cramming and
Review to
handle.
There are two types of students:
(a) The student who has had good case gain and studies easily, or
the student
who may not have had much auditing but studies and audits well
in spite of
his case.
(b) The student whose case continuously gets in the way and requires
auditing
before he will make much progress.
The fast students are permitted to fly right along, no
harassment or
interruptions, quick concise checkouts. They go fast. They are
encouraged to go
fast. They get the idea that Dianetics is simple and they want to
audit. The
supervisor doesn't introduce complications or unusual assignments or
'special
drills' not on the checksheet. The student then gets into auditing. He
knows the
course was simple and uncomplicated. He carries this attitude into
auditing and
produces simple standard sessions with good results.
The slow student is twinned with another slow student (not with
the
supervisor) and if he doesn't make the grade at all he is sent to
Cramming after
a period and auditing may be required. The system of senior students
auditing
the newer students, together with any needed Reviews, will handle the
(b) type
student (particularly if a Class VIII Case Supervisor and Review
Auditor are
available). The supervisor must
260
avoid being led into giving the slow student special attention and
additional
time at the expense of the majority fast students.
Supervisors are normally very hard working and conscientious.
They do an
excellent job but can, in their own well intentioned desire to have
all students
doing well, be misled into adding to the course, becoming instructors
instead of
supervisors, getting too involved with slow students and thus slowing
down the
course as a whole and producing slow cautious students who carry this
attitude
into auditing and so flunk sessions. A supervisor doing this can make
students
too frightened to audit.
If the supervisor validates the fast students by quick pertinent
checkouts, keeps the course simple and avoids all additives (like
assigning
additional checkouts to the whole class, or group question and answer
periods,
etc), pairs up any slow students and uses standard course policy,
Ethics and
Review, he will have a fast course and will produce competent
uncomplicated
auditors who' know and apply their data, like to audit, and give good
standard
sessions.
Brian
Livingston
CS-5
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:BL:ei.aap ,
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
261
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 AUGUST 1969
(Corrects & replaces HCO P/L of
14 May 1969-Same Title)
Remimeo
Dianetics
Course
STARRATE CHECKOUTS
ON STANDARD DIANETICS COURSE
The following are starrate checked out on the Standard Dianetics
Course.
HCO Bulletin of 6 May 1969 "Routine 3-R Revised
(Issue II) Engram Running by Chains"
HCO Bulletin of 23 April 1969 "Dianetics-BASIC DEFINITIONS"
HCO Bulletin of 29 April 1969 "Assessment and Interest"
HCO Bulletin of 19 May 1969 "Health Form, Use of"
HCO Bulletin of 9 May 1969 "Case Supervising Dianetics
Folders"
HCO Bulletin of 28 June 1969 "How to Case Supervise
Dianetics Folders"
TRs 0-4 (Practical)
TRs 101 - 104 (Practical)
E-Meter Drill 23 "Assessment by Tone Arm"
E-Meter Drill 26 "Differentiation between Sizes
of Reads"
The balance of the checksheet is done Fast Flow by Attestation.
STARRATE CHECKOUTS
It is not required that Starrate Checkouts be done by the Course
Supervisor or Asst Supervisors. This becomes impractical as course
numbers
increase.
Students should be Starrate Checked out by students other than
their twin.
The usual way this is done is for two pairs of twins to "Cross
Checkout", that
is, two pairs working side by side checkout members of the other pair.
But any
student other than the person's twin may give the student a Starrate
Checkout.
The person giving the checkout initials and dates the checksheet, thus
attesting
that he has given a proper Starrate Checkout and that the Student has
passed.
The Course Supervisor and Assistant Supervisors must constantly
observe
Starrate Checkouts being given, and ensure that the standard remains
high, in
full accordance with HCO P/L 14 May 69 Issue H (How to do a Starrate
Checkout)
and HCOB 11 October 1967 (Clay Table Training).
Tony Dunleavy
LRH:TD:ldm.ei.rd Plans & Training
Aide
Copyright ($) 1969 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Note: This revision corrected the date of "Health Form, Use of" from
16 April
1969, added HCO B 28 June 1969, TRs 101-104 and the last three
paragraphs. It
was later cancelled by HCO P/L 31 December 1970, Standard Twin
Checkouts, in the
1970 Year Book; and 14 May 1969 was cancelled by HCO P/L 29 July 1972
Issue II,
Fast Flow in Training (which also cancelled 31 December 1970), in the
1972 Year
Book.]
262
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 OCTOBER 1969
Revised and Reissued
10 DECEMBER 1969
Remimeo
BPI
Franchise
The Auditor DIANETIC COURSES,
WILDCAT
Unauthorized and incompetent Dianetic courses are bound to
spring up and
have already.
Policy on this is to insist they have a competent HDG to teach
them.
They can send one of their number to an Scn org. We will do
anything
possible to make it easy to train their instructor.
We will grant their students an HDC certificate of a special
type on the
sworn attestation of their HDG Supervisor (who must have been
officially
trained) that his student has passed an exacting examination with a
grade of
100%, has sworn to follow the Auditor's Code and has done 25 hours of
auditing
all well done or very well done in' results according to the pc at
certificate
cost.
We will make full study texts available to them and their
students.
On the other hand we control absolutely the copyrights and
materials and
can enforce them.
As, we are only insisting they get the straight data, it should
be easy to
make such arrangements as we are very reasonable and only wish to
help.
Scientology auditors are trained only by our orgs.
"Wildcat" (meaning springing up anywhere) Dianetic students will
soon
realize the value of being backed up by a Scientology auditor, thus
sending
students to our orgs.
Action should be taken to handle this situation wherever it
occurs. We are
only seeking to protect results and the repute of Dianetics. We want
people to
win and stand ready to help.
No one has to covertly teach Dianetics. We will let them do it
quite
openly so long as they have their supervisor trained and use the
actual texts.
Authorized Franchises and officially registered groups teach HDC
Courses
on an official basis and receive validated official certificates.
All certificates are provisional until re-examined by the
Director of
Certificates and Awards of an Official org, at which, time 'they are
stamped
"Professional". The examination charge is $15.00.
Any certificate may be withdrawn if falsely procured, for abuse
or
failure to follow the Auditor's Code.
LRH:rs.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: This revision added the last three paragraphs and changed the
fourth
paragraph from "We will grant their students HDC certs on their attest
at
certificate cost (S2.50)" to the above.]
263
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
20 Buckingham Street, London W.C.2, England
Executives in Washington and London:
Mary Sue; Dick Steves, Julia Lewis; Don Breeding,
Jack Parkhouse.
THE SUMMARY OF A BULLETIN FROM THE ACADEMY IN WASHINGTON D.C.
CONCERNING TRAINING
Scientology organizations have recently surveyed and re-studied
training
and its results in the light of the best benefits for the student, the
public
and the organizations themselves, therefore the following programs are
being
instigated, as they prove feasible. Training is classified and is
being
enfranchised along the following lines:
FIRST LEVEL: , FREE COURSE
This level of training is performed by Auditors throughout the
world and
even by the organizations themselves. It consists of a one or two-week
free
course (depending on whether or not it's given five times a week or
three times
a week) covering the most elementary principles which general groups
can agree
with in Scientology. The total aim of this course is to get people who
are
working in and are interested in Scientology to carry forward more of
Scientology programs. This is a very important course both for
individuals and
the organization, but it's mainly important to the general public. It
is not
the purpose of this course to teach even a tenth of what appears in
"Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought". The purpose is to take
people who
have or have not heard of Scientology and give them their first real
reality on
the subject by taking some of the most elementary but far-reaching
principles
and getting them to examine the principles and finally come to an
agreement
concerning them. No certificate is awarded on this course.
SECOND COURSE: ADVANCED COURSE
This course is given for a fee and consists of twenty hours or
more
instruction, advancing even further into Scientology and teaching in
particular
two subjects, ten hours of instruction at least being devoted to each.
These
instructions cover exactly the first ten hour period of the Advanced
Course: the
communication formula and its use; and the second period of at least
ten hours:
the tone scale. These two subjects are taught-each an equal number of
hours so
that people can be admitted to an Advanced Course at its mid point.
Here again
there's no effort to teach auditing but only the use and application
of the
communication formula and the tone scale. Two books exist for this
subject. One
is "Dianetics 1955!" which covers the communication formula, and
"Science of
Survival" which covers at least the elementary tone scale and what can
be
expected from it. These are the two text books of this particular
course. Care
must be taken in this course that the student is not overwhelmed and
confused
but is actually given ,a few more key stable data with which he can
work in
line. This course does not intend to make an auditor, there is no
certificate
granted for this course.
THIRD COURSE: ELEMENTARY SCIENTOLOGIST
This course teaches auditing of individuals and groups and is in
actuality
a very complete course on the subject of Scientology. It takes up 1956
HCA
tapes, it takes up the various text books and it teaches individual
and group
processing and teaches as well the handling of organizations and
personnel in
them. It is probable that this course would cost about $125 or at
least �35.
This course requires a right to train from the Founding Church or the
HASI. It
ends with a certificate from the Central Organizations, the exact
title of this
auditor has not been established, but the title would mean Elementary
Scientologist. The certificate is signed by the Training Auditor who
did the
actual training and by the secretary of the organization issuing' the
certificate. The title of this course would not be an HCA Course even
though HCA
tapes are used and the certificate given would not be Hubbard
Certified Auditor
or Hubbard Professional Auditor. As it is to this level that most
rights to
train are directing themselves and as they are cramped by having to
charge so
much money and as the examination has occasioned so much difficulty,
it is
thought to be helpful to Auditors "training in the field" to have this
course to
teach.
FOURTH COURSE: HUBBARD CERTIFIED AUDITOR
This course will be taught by the Central Organizations only.
The British
264
equivalent would be Hubbard Professional Auditor. According to present
planning
this course would. require as its fundamental the requisite
certification by a
field training auditor either in day or night school, probably most
effectively
the latter and would apply some of what had been paid on an elementary
course to
the fee in the Central Organization as a reduction. In other words it
would not
only be a requisite in having training elsewhere but also the training
elsewhere
would carry with it a reduction. That this is only taught by the
Central
Organizations does not mean the Central Organizations would not also
teach an
Elementary Scientologist Course. A considerable rigor of training
would be
entered in to the Central Organizations and the certificate of HCA or
HPA would
be. awarded by examination only.
FIFTH COURSE: HUBBARD ADVANCED AUDITOR (B.SCN. ABROAD)~
This course would be an extended Advanced Course which would
more closely
take up 'the entire body of theory and information of Scientology and
which
would improve the Auditor's case level and operational ability. The
certificate
of Hubbard Advanced Auditor (Bachelor of Scientology abroad) would be
awarded at
course completion by 'reason of successful examination.
SIXTH COURSE: HUBBARD GRADUATE AUDITOR (D.SCN. ABROAD)
This course would be taught as an Advanced Clinical Unit,
preferably by
L.R.H. only. It would consists of the equivalent of a three-week
intensive, two
weeks of high school indoctrination so as to be able to cope with any
kind of a
case and a week of coaching on processes. This is actually a new type
of
Advanced Clinical Course only so far as its actual pattern is
concerned. It
would be instructed by L.R.H. At the end of course by examination the
certificate of Hubbard Graduate Auditor or Doctor of Scientology
abroad, would
be issued.
SEVENTH COURSE: ORGANIZATIONAL INTERNSHIP
This course would be actually an internship and would be
available in the
several ways as follows:
(a) TYPE A INTERNSHIP.
The Central Organization chooses amongst the HPAs or HCAs
graduating,
extremely likely students and offers them a year's internship to be
performed in
the various organizational units, auditing, instructing and
administrating so as
to completely familiarize the student with the various workings of the
organization (which are sufficiently complex and are a sufficiently
large study
at this time that very few people understand them who are not working
with the
organizations themselves). The student would sign a contract paying a
certain
sum of money by the contract to the organization for the year's
internship. A
Type A Internship would however give the student several weeks of
probationary
employment at a rather low wage and the remainder of the year
employment at a
reasonably good wage,' only less than that of an equivalent staff
member. At the
end of his year's training he is given a certificate as a Staff
Auditor and with
that title, which, attests the fact that he has served for a year
within the
organization in the capacity of a Professional Auditor. The Type A
Internship
and no other internship would influence earlier training fees
contracted. By
issuing such internships the organization would be sure that the
individual then
released into the field 'would be able to carry on independently and
would be
able to do extremely well as his auditing would be excellent. The
reason of
being entered on an internship would not bring about any other degree
and these
would have to be studied for as in an ACC, deducting only such time of
study
from the year, but the fees for any additional courses would have to
be paid.
(b) TYPE B INTERNSHIP.
A Type B Internship would be solicited by students, not offered
by the
organization. It would consist of the payment of a fee to the
organization for a
year's additional training in the organization itself and would follow
more or
less the same pattern as a Type A Internship, with the exception that
the Type B
Intern would not be on the pay roll. All of his activities would be
conducted on
a purely self-supporting basis. 'He would pay the' fee to the
organization for
this work and training. At the end of that time he too would be issued
a
certificate as Staff Auditor of the organization. Both' the Type A.
Internship
and the Type B Internship certificates would be signed by the Director
of
Training and Director of Processing and by L.R.H.
265
(c) TYPE C INTERNSHIP.
This Internship would be available to HCAs determining to work
'with Staff
Auditors in the field. In addition to his HCA training he would then
have a
year's training working in the offices of other auditors. The
initiation of a
Type C Internship would be totally in the hands of field auditors and
the
arrangements they would make would be completely independent of the
Central
Organization. The only certificate authorized for a Type C Internship
would be
an endorsement on the HCA or HPA certificate by the Central
Organization that
this auditor had worked for one year with a field auditor under
internship.
Concerning all Internships, credit for the Internship fee would
be no
great liability to the organization since people who will get around
the
organizations for a year actively engaged in handling the fundamental
problems
of the organizations of Scientology are usually in their later
personal
practices quite well off. No shorter period than one year should be
tolerated.
The Intern in leaving the organization or in committing sufficient
breaches of
the Code of a Scientologist to occasion his dismissal from the
organization
would not be absolved from his Internship contract and the contract
should be so
written. When he has passed his probationary period of the first few
weeks and
has actually been accepted on a full internship basis he is fully
committed to
his Internship contract. Up until that time his dismissal or relief
from
Internship would absolve him of the contract. The grade of permanent
staff would
therefore have to be designated. This exists in fact at this time.
There are
auditors who prefer the companionship and team-work of the
organizations to
individual practice and these as Instructors and Staff Auditors are
,the
backbone of the organization. They would therefore have to be
specially
designated as permanent staff and would receive a higher salary than
other
auditors in the organization-by which is meant permanent interns Type
A.
This training plan is built out of experience and although some
fault
may be found with it in various places it is discovered that a high
fee long
duration HCA course works a considerable hardship on a field auditor.
He does
not actually profit from it. He could however profit from a low fee
evening or
even day-course without the added complexities of Central Organization
examination, checking states of case and the randomity which has
occasionally
arisen. It is thought that a person with the right to train would be
able to
support himself much better financially at the lower fee he would
rather charge
and without having the duress put upon him to do the same amount of
work with
the student as would be required in an HCA. Furthermore' this type of
training
could be made available in other parts of the world than the United
States. The
Central Organization could actively Support these rights to train by
demanding
that training be done to some degree in the field as a requisite to
Central
Organization courses. This would permit the Central Organization to
turn out a
better grade of HCA in the long run and would actually put a lot of
auditors
into action throughout the country who would not then, if their work
was not of
the highest possible calibre, bring embarrassment to auditors in the
field who
are 'very busy in numerous directions and do not complete training to
the degree
that the Central Organization insists on. One of the reasons this
third
course is instigated is to permit the auditor with the right to train
to swell
his numbers of students and to relieve him of the rather heavy expense
connected
with an arduous complete auditor course and permitting him to exist
without
putting into rivalry with himself a number of people who have more or
less the
same degree he has, a point which has lately been found quite
important in large
cities. A new training contract could be entered into with the Central
Organizations which obviated the irksome "Bond-note" and the duress
which has
occurred because of the anxiety of the Central Organization to keep up
the
quality or raise the quality as high as possible of the HCA or HPA
certificate.
This arrangement would not influence certificates issued ex post
facto, but
would influence all future certificates. Areas of training could be
assigned to
people with the right to train. It has been discovered that people who
take the
Free Course and the Advanced Course then get ready for a third course,
and
unless this course is available they are dead-ended since these are
business
people who must take their training at night and it is not usually
possible for
them to take a local course of the vigor of HCA, nevertheless they
want to
become auditors and professional Scientologists and every effort
should be made
to encourage them. At the same time, since every auditor who has a
right to
train has been trained by the Central Organizations, his own dominance
in his
area to some degree depends upon his own level of certification by the
Central
Organization and he should not be permitted to destroy his dominance
in his own
area by creating equal grades, or grades which even come within the
scope of
Central Organization certificates since the public itself is liable to
consider
this an equal grade. This is actually antipathetic to the general
customs of
man, which is why it has not worked. The basic error in all these
rights to
train was the people were being given the right by the Central
266
Organization to create at the same level of operation as themselves
and a
considerable hardship resulted since their own Superiority in their
own areas
then became rivalled and randomity ensued.
It is my recommendation to various staff and executives that
this be taken
up both in Washington and London, looked over very carefully, and a
thorough
paper be prepared and issued on the subject giving in addition the
exact cost,
except in the case of the Elementary Scientologist where the fee
should be
arranged in the area by the individual auditor doing the training. ,He
should
not be limited in his charges or made to charge excessively.
Completely aside from the actual studies which have been made of
the
subject utilizing the data accumulated during the last six years, we
have at
this time another paralleling program of some interest in the Central
Organizations. This, just amongst ourselves, consists of processing
people up
to a point of where they can handle other people. We have accomplished
this now.
it is a fact, and as we ourselves advance in the organization in this
capability
we then of course then extend this capability outwards, therefore we
will have
to be thinking in terms of seniorities of certificates and training in
order to
back up this basic program. The basic program of course consists of
demanding
that everybody that we keep in good circulation and that we help
along, have
enough' processing on the current processes to permit him to control
rather
easily individuals and groups. This of course going out as the waves
in a pool
into which a stone is dropped would mean that our organizations would
become
dominant on earth. It might not even take very long to accomplish this
program.
In working with this program we of course must have an equivalent
series of
training staffs.
One further note on Elementary Scientologist. We would require
this
certificate and successful completion of a further course above as a
pre-
requisite to Ministerial ordination by the field churches. They are
going to
ordain people anyway sooner or later and we prefer of course. that
they ordain
at HCA or HPA level, but they can ordain at the Elementary
Scientologist level,
but we require an HCA ordination and therefore we have a much higher
grade of
ordination and it makes the ministers which we train dominant in the
field.
It is my suggestion that for their own good, people with rights
to train
and other people who'd like to have rights to train, particularly in
the British
Isles and in places in America where there is very little training,
that this
third Elementary Scientologist Course be sold. I do not think it would
be wise
to undertake in the future HCA training in any branch office of the
organization, such as New York or Dublin. I think it should be
adequate that
those offices simply run a third level course. They would find many
more
candidates since they would not have to charge as much money and these
offices
are not equipped to train at HCA the way we're training now.
One of the primary factors which makes this an urgency and gives
us a
priority in putting it in through the works is the use of a double-
type of
training which we're doing now in the Central Organization where we
indoctrinate
for two or three weeks and even process before we train. Nobody can
afford to do
this in the field. The cost of it is very high, consequently nobody
will do it
in the field. Therefore an HCA course and an HPA course will become
something
entirely different.
There is no reason under this why British auditors in good
repute with the
organization could not undertake evening courses for people in their
area in
order to fit students of theirs for using Scientology in industry and
personnel
posts and so forth. The title of the grade is important since it must
be good
enough to make the field auditor capable of selling it and it must not
be so
good that it devaluates a Central Organization certificate-must hang
in that
middle-ground.
Another factor which occasions this release to executive staff
and
interested persons is that I am not willing that auditors who are
poorly trained
and in terrible condition longer use Hubbard Certified Auditor when I
have not
even seen them or checked them. We're getting sufficiently big that I
realize
with a shock that I have Central Organization HCAs around that I have
not even
met and this is a peculiar state of affairs. We have to have some way
of
identifying the arduous training which our people receive because we
are about
to make it about ten times as arduous as anybody in the field would
even dream
of.
Let's put this one into operation.
LRH:re.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Dict'd 12.9.56
Typed 19.9.56
267
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 MAY 1957
(Issued at Washington)
To All Staff
TRAINING-WHAT IT IS TODAY
HOW WE TELL PEOPLE ABOUT IT
In London I made up a chart of training for the Comm Course
(former
Indoc) and HPA/HCA.
This course is plotted exactly on eight weeks including an
intensive
by a graduating student upon an incoming student.
The stable datum of all training now is:
"A student is graduated when his training level is such that he
could
be entrusted with an HGC preclear."
Thus examination is rendered much easier and stable.
HPA/HCA Training requisites stress:
1. Synopsis of all important Dianetic and Scientology Books and a
synopsis
of tapes heard.
2. Profile student achieved when auditing an incomer.
3. Memorized Axioms.
4. Five levels of Indoc.
5. Long form CCH.
6. Good attendance record.
7. Ability to Group Audit.
8. The Codes down pat.
That is more or less it. The Chart is intensely specific.
Paramount in all our training are:
I. To get our graduating students in good shape; and
2. To make sure our incoming students are given a good week
intensive by
the graduating student before the newcomer enters Comm Course.
Why?
Because Comm Course can reduce havingness and we want our new
Comm Course
student to learn, not agonize.
Training today can be pretty smooth.
But be alert here. We've changed type of training from emphasis
on
Classroom to emphasis on Student. "Academy" means coaching.
In Public representation of Washington and London schools Stress
that
eight weeks of personal individual attention can make a Scientologist
and a good
one and that this is why the cost is what it is. This training is the
best on
Earth for living in general as well as doing Scientology. "It's
personal. It's
for you. It's good. Only those who have it can Survive."
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:md.cden
Copyright ($) 1957
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
268
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
(Issued at Washington DC)
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 OCTOBER 1958
Full Distribution
Not Confidential
HCO BOARD OF REVIEW
We must now recognize that we are training Earth's mental-
spiritual
practitioners of tomorrow. Therefore:
Hereinafter, all examinations for certificates will be conducted
by HCO
Boards of Review only.
General Qualifications and prerequisites for all certificates
and degrees
worldwide: No candidate for enrollment or examination may be disbarred
by reason
of race, colour, creed, nationality, ideology, age, mental condition,
language,
former training or social condition.
Qualifications for HPA/HCA
One year minimum in training before certificate may be issued,
although
examination may be within that period.
At least 8 weeks spent in an Academy of Scientology with
creditable grades.
Actual evidence of skill in handling Formal Auditing (TRs 0 to
5).
Actual evidence of skill in handling Tone 40 Auditing (TRs 6 to
9).
Verbatim knowledge and understanding of:
The Auditor's Code
The Pre-Logics
The Logics of Dianetics
The Axioms of Dianetics
Mental Anatomy: Definitions and examples of each of the following:
LOCKS,
SECONDARY, ENGRAM, CHAIN, TIME TRACK, CIRCUIT, MACHINERY,
VALENCE,
OCCLUSIONS, MOCK UP, THE PARTS OF LIVINGNESS.
Manifestations: Definitions and examples of each of the following:
Overt-Act-Motivator Sequence, DED-DEDEX, Problems, computations,
past
lives, cognitions, comm lags, and when they are over,
introversion,
extroversion, ARC, remedy of ARC breaks.
The candidate must demonstrate his ability to:
(No E-Meter work of any kind is done or required in an HPA/HCA
course.)
Run Factual Havingness
Run an engram
Find and run a past death
Find and run a secondary
Run ARC Straight Wire
Handle difficulties with old style straight wire
Run Remedy of Havingness
269
Handle an Assist
Locational Processing
8-C
Op Pro by Dup, Old Style
No other processes are required or taught as these are quite
adequate.
Texts: Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, Science of
Survival,
Self Analysis and Advanced Procedure and Axioms.
The following Scales must be known and examples must be
provided:
ARC Tone Scale
Effect Scale
Know to Mystery Scale
Evidence of having read and understood Dianetics: The Modern
Science of
Mental Health, Science of Survival, Self Analysis and Advanced
Procedure and
Axioms must be given.
After a set date of enrollment (October 15, 1958) no examination
exceptions will be made. Students whose enrollment date is prior to
October 15,
1958 will be the same as before.
Three Formal case history forms giving evidence of having helped
three
persons with Dianetics and Scientology.
An HPA/HCA student must present evidence of having had 5 hours
of Op Pro
by Dup Old Style run on him without interruption.
Qualifications for HCS/BScn
(which are equivalent levels)
Certificate to be issued no earlier than one year from date of
enrollment
in HCS/BScn course (Effective after October 15, 1958).
Successful attendance of at least 5 weeks of courses at an
Academy of
Scientology.
A review examination guaranteeing ability in TRs 0 to 9.
Verbatim knowledge of:
The Axioms of Scientology
Demonstration and Evidence of complete conversance with:
The Handbook for Preclears
Scientology 8-80
Sciento logy 8-8008
The Creation of Human Ability
Demonstration of excellent knowledge of CCH 0 to CCH 4.
Demonstration of good knowledge of and handling of an E-Meter.
Demonstration of knowledge of the six types of processes:
1. Starting-Ending Session
2. Control Processes
3. Duplication Processes
4. Subjective Processes
5. Objective Processes
6. Straight Wire Processes
Some knowledge of all the R- 1 and R-2 processes of The Creation
of
Human Ability.
270
Demonstration and knowledge of Creative Processing,
Demonstration and knowledge of the basic clearing processes
given in Clear
Procedure, Issue One, and a concentration on this clear procedure and
no other
later procedure as this clears 50% of the preclears easily so long as
one uses
simple geometric forms, particularly simple spheres, in Step 6.
Three Formal case history forms giving evidence of having helped
three
persons with Scientology (in addition to HCA/HPA required cases).
Qualifications for HCS/DScn
(effective October 15, 1958)
Certificate may not be issued for one year after date of
application for
an ACC.
A review examination of TRs 0 to 9 requiring excellence in
handling them.
Demonstrate how to produce the 5 manifestations of an E-Meter
and handle
an E-Meter in auditing.
A review examination of the whole of the above requirements for
HCA/HPA
and HCS/BScn. (A passing grade on this section will be 50% until
October 15,
1961 when a grade of 75% will be required.)
The knowledge and ability to do group auditing.
Demonstration of a full and complete knowledge of ACC Procedure
of the
5th London ACC.
Knowledge of the basic buttons taught in the 20th ACC US and
their use.
Attendance at an Academy ACC with a course completion and a
passing grade.
One or more ACCs may be attended, only one need to have been completed
and
passed.
A knowledge of hypnotism.
A knowledge of the history of religion and psychotherapy.
Evidence of having cleared one person and the full case history
submitted
as well as the Formal Case Report.
Evidence of having greatly helped two persons with auditing with
Formal
Case History.
A thesis covering an application of Scientology to a field of
endeavour.
Membership in the HASI.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:rs.rd
[Note~ Per HCOB 9 October 1958, in Qualifications for HPA/HCA,
Advanced
Procedure and Axioms was added to the list of texts, and also replaced
Handbook for Preclears two paragraphs later.]
271
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
(Issued at Washington D.C.)
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 OCTOBER 1958
Worldwide Distribution
and Application
SALE AND CONDUCT OF ACADEMY COURSES
(Refer to HCO Policy Letter of 1 October 1958)
As of October 15, 1958, effective date, the circumstances and
enrollment
procedures of courses are changed worldwide.
While the administration must yet be set up the fact and
advertisements
exist as of October 15, 1958. Even if it isn't done don't put anybody
on wait
while we scramble. Sign them up and somehow deliver.
Basically: A student may enroll for a course as before but he
must
understand it will require a year from enrollment date to get his
certificate
because of Extension Work. We then have two phases of training:
Extension Work
done at home, and Class work done at the Academy. His course in the
Academy is
still 8 weeks for HCA/HPA, London, 5 weeks for HCS/BScn, London, 6
weeks for
HGS/DScn, London. He may do these weeks at once but he has other work
to do as
well. He is enrolled for a one-year course in each certificate status.
He should
not be discouraged by confronting him with this. It does not matter
when he
takes his time in the Academy so long as he does it. There are written
work,
exercises and reports on cases to be done before his final exam. It
has always
taken a year, you can say, to get any actual certificate. We are just
now making
a reality of it. He can audit people or do anything else he wants, but
the time
is one year from enrollment to certificate in any grade. He could take
all
Academy work for all three grades in 5 months all jammed up but he'll
still have
to complete his first year to get his first certificate. This is no
gyp school.
It takes three years to get the top rating and more time is spent on
the mind
and thetan in those three years than in 1 5 years of psychology or
psychiatry.
We're taking over the fields of the mind and spirit on Earth. Our
people have to
be good. Any applicant will agree to that.
EXTENSION COURSES
Anyone may enroll in an Academy course to HCA/HPA for �2.0.0 or
$5.00. He
has to buy his texts (we give away no more texts after October 15,
1958 and
allow only membership discount if he is a member). The enrollment is
for one
year. Any answer to his enrollment is to send him C.O.D. (permission
to do so
must be on the blank he sends in-blank to be in Certainty) a
"Dianetics: Modern
Science of Mental Health", hard cover. (Blank must also be able to say
he
already has it if he does.) He is sent directly by first-class mall
his first
lessons. Even if he has been in Academy he does these. They are
printed lessons
he has to fill out. He furnishes the envelopes and stamps. The lessons
are
uniformly simple. One is due back each week. The page is perforated at
the
bottom so a lower strip may be torn off by the Extension Course
Director,
written on and returned by first-class mall in an envelope. The
student gets a
nudging card if he fails to send in a lesson. These lessons are a
chapter by
chapter coverage of Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health only.
They
require mainly agreement. The student can go no further than
Dianetics: Modern
Science of Mental Health data (no practice) when we find it necessary
to bring
him in for his 8 weeks (preferable) or at least a Comm Course. Given
his Comm
Course, his next lessons still apply to Dianetics: Modern Science of
Mental
Health but now they are auditing practice lessons. We make him find
locks,
secondaries, engrams in several people. Then we bring him back for
more training
or (if he took his 8 weeks) we have him audit things out of people-
locks,
engrams, secondaries. We have additional lessons covering the
remaining texts.
The Addressograph Section takes these students' names and addresses
and keeps
the list up to date. Sets of envelopes, cards for file for lessons
(that can be
used as postal cards but are not stamped) for each week are run off
and refiled
as lessons appear from student (leaving the delinquents to be reminded
by simply
mailing the card).
The whole of this or any extension course is crisp comm line and
accurate
272
administration. It is simple if it is prompt and neat. The whole
project can be
nicely ruined by poor administration on this. The quality of lessons
should be
good but are secondary to good thorough administration. People would
always
rather get a new theory or a dizzy plan rather than face these vital
pieces of
Mest and a systematic handling of them. Cards and file drawers are
obviously
vicious.
A plan of the course and how to do it is sent with the
enrollment reply,
plus an enrollment card he can show his friends to explain why he
wants to
practice on them.
Similar texts and enrollment measures are taken for the HCS/BScn
course,
and the HGS/DScn.
The texts for each of these courses are listed in HCO Policy
Letter of
October 1, 1958. No other textual or factual material is to be used
and no
further course booklets or pamphlets are necessary.
What is necessary:
Lesson tablets, in glued-together sheets like a writing tablet,
25 lessons
to a tablet, each sheet being its own lesson. The sheet is perforated
across the
last 5th of the page. The student's name, current address, course, and
answers,
are all written by the student. The Extension Course Director writes
any comment
or grade on the bottom slip, tears it off and sends it back to the
student. If
no lesson came, a card goes to student reminding him. When it comes
time for the
student to come in for his course he comes in, pays for the week or
weeks he
takes, goes home, gets more work to do, is finally examined (either at
home or
at Academy [two different exams]) and when he passes he promptly gets
his
certificate. This is true for all three courses.
Certainty must at once carry ads and continue to carry ads for
"Academy
Enrollment-one year, do work at Academy and at home-Enroll now,
�2.0.0, receive
your first lessons." An enrollment blank, that with �2.0.0 enrolls him
must
always be part of the ad.
The idea of field training plus Academy training for a
certificate and the
fact of 3 years of training to the top will appeal.
Academy courses must be carefully geared to HCO Policy Letter of
October
1, 1958. This scramble to "get the newest learned first" is giving us
training
disasters. Of course, the student would prefer facing a thought or
theory or a
quick think process to facing real live engrams, secondaries, and
banks. So we
don't train them well. They're not like 1950 Dianetic auditors-they're
flinching
these days.
And who said you couldn't clear people by running engrams? You
couldn't if
you had no TRs and therefore ragged auditing and ARC breaks.
Any time you write or say Dianetics today, define it-"Dianetics,
that
part of Scientology which stresses mental anatomy." That swings people
into
Scientology before they think about it. They are not then surprised to
hear
from the Academy of Scientology about Dianetics,
"A minister has to know mental anatomy before he can know the
spirit,"
"The brain forms no part of the study of Dianetics," are two more
lines that
must be gotten about even if only as bottom lines on a Certainty or
Ability
page.
----------
This programme of 3 years training by 1 year stages is now
begun. We'll
just have to commit ourselves to it and cope with it and have it
wheeling before
the paper-back Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health gets in the
drugstores
next spring. So here we go.
Who activates all this? Why, you do, of course.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:md.rs.rd
273
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
Issued at Washington
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 DECEMBER 1958
Distribution:
All Activities
ACADEMY TRAINING CURRICULUM & EXAMINATION
Supersedes all earlier Theory & Practice Releases
The training of HPAs and HCAs must include the following skills.
HCO Bds
of Review, by this directive will examine only on these skills and
texts:
Comm Course, TR 0 to 4 Old Style (as given in TR Manuals and
bulletins),
with TR SN substituted for all earlier TR 5 drills.
Upper Indoc TR 6-9 Old Style (original, as given in TR Manuals
and
bulletins).
The above must be done thoroughly and well and will be examined
rigorously
by HCO Bds of Review. If flunked in any case no further exam is given
or will be
given for 120 days for any certificate (HAS being exempt from
examination except
by instructor or field auditor).
Theory & Practice Basic theory is more or less covered by
Extension Course
but may be examined on these texts:
Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health
Science of Survival
Advanced Procedure & Axioms
Scientology- Fundamentals of Thought
TECHNIQUES
The HCA/HPA must know two types of auditing:
Tone 40 Style
Formal Auditing Style.
He must know the difference and not cross them. (T-40 is taught
in Upper
Indoc, Formal is taught in Comm Course.)
He must know these processes:
Tone 40 CCH 1
CCH 2
CCH3
CCH 4
and Formal Straight Wire
S-C-S
Factual Havingness (3 questions)
What can you confront?
You make a picture for which you can be wholly
responsible.
Help
Step 6 (and its dangers)
BScn/HCS training and examination includes all materials on
Clear
Procedure and ACC Clear Procedure Fall 1958, plus Scientology 8-8008
and
Creation of Human Ability and E-Meters, and must be able to audit all
processes
in ACC Clear Procedure Fall 1958, including CCH 0. He must be able to
do a full
track Scout.
DScn/HGS: Engram Auditing and other materials as will be
prescribed.
Note HCO Secretaries everywhere, please assist Academies to hold
to
standard Technology as above and assist where possible with
publications.
Note: HCO Bds of Review: Examine only on the above henceforth.
This is a
finalized version since Clears can be made by HPAs/HCAs now as well as
BScns and
DScns with these processes.
L. RON HUBBARD
[See also HCO B 6 January 1959, page 277.]
274
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
DofT HCO BULLETIN OF 16 DECEMBER 1958
Acad Admin
Ext Course Dir
Acad Insts
D of P
Processing Admin
HCO Bd of Review
ACC Worldwide Inst
HCO
EXTENSION COURSE CURRICULUM
The Extension Course for HCA/HPA is outlined as follows:
Section A - I tablet
Lessons 1A to 20A, eight questions each lesson: Dianetics,
Modern Science
of Mental Health, entire book covered in 160 questions..
Section B - 1 tablet
Lessons lB to 20B, eight questions each lesson, Science of
Survival,
entire book covered in 160 questions.
Section C - 1 tablet
Lessons lC to 20C, eight questions each lesson. Advanced
Procedure and
Axioms, entire book covered in 160 questions.
Section D - 1 tablet
Lessons 1D to 20D, eight questions each lesson. Scientology:
Fundamentals
of Thought, entire book covered in 160 questions.
The Extension Course for HCS/BScn is outlined as follows:
Section E - 1 tablet
Lessons 1 E to 20E, eight questions each lesson. The Hubbard
Electrometer
and Electropsychometric Auditing, entire subject covered in 160
questions,
theory and practice.
Section F - 1 tablet
Lessons lF to 20F, eight questions each lesson, Scientology: 8-
8008,
entire book covered in 160 questions.
Section G - I tablet
Lessons I G to 20G, eight questions each lesson, The Creation of
Human
Ability, entire book covered in 160 questions.
Section H - 1 tablet
Lessons I H to 20H, eight questions each lesson. Various Clear
Procedures
from various texts, entire subject covered in 160 questions.
The Extension Course for DScn/HGS is outlined as follows.
Section J - 1 tablet
Lessons 1J to. 20J, eight questions per lesson. All TR Drills,
entire
subject covered in 160 lessons (text not yet published).
Section K - I tablet .
Lessons 1K to 20K, eight questions per lesson, Track Scouting
(text not
yet.. published). Entire subject covered in 160 questions.
Section L - 1 tablet
Lessons 1 L to 20L, eight questions per lesson, Scientology
Organizations,
entire subject covered in 160 questions.
Section M - 1 tablet
Not outlined. .. .-
The following activities are responsible for submitting
questions to be
made into printed lessons:
275
Section A - Academy DC
Section B - Academy London
Section C . - HCO Bd of Review DC
Section D - HCO Bd of Review London
Section E - HGC Washington DC
Section F - HGC London
Section G - Academy London
Section H - HCO Washington DC
Section J - ACC Worldwide Instructor
Section K - ACC Worldwide Instructor
When you have completed your section, please send the questions
complete
to HCO for forwarding to me.
This is the fastest way I know to get the Extension Course
completed. I
have only its format and a DMSMH outline at this moment. Would you do
this for
me?
HOW TO WRITE AN EXTENSION COURSE SECTION
An Extension Course Section consists of a textbook and a series
of lessons
done on a glued-top tablet, one sheet per lesson, eight questions or
exercises
per lesson. The questions are consecutively numbered from 1 to 160
with the
Identifying letter on each number. Example: Section B, third question,
is 3B.
The name of the textbook but not its page numbers, is carried on every
lesson
page, not each question.
We only want the questions for the section, not the printed
complete
product.
The questions concern only vital definitions needed for a
knowledge of the
subject and examples of the use and meaning.
To do a course, use the following:
1. Make a list of all vital definitions used in the text
specified on the
subject. These should number around eighty so pare or expand the list
until it
is composed of eighty vital words or phrases or objects:
Use the definition for odd numbered questions.
Demand an explanation, an example, a discovery from real life, a
consequence, etc, of the definition as the following even-numbered
question.
The Extension Course should give the taker a passing knowledge
of
Dianetics and Scientology terminology phenomena and parts. This is its
goal and
purpose. The reasoning or examples in a text are considered secondary,
for the
purposes of the course, to precision definitions.
The Extension Course Student should finish the course with the
feeling he
is dealing with a precision science, composed of identifiable parts.
Example (not necessary to use):
Question 5A: What is a reactive mind?
Question 6A: Give something out of your own experience that
would
illustrate a reactive mind at work.
The main tasks imposed here are (1) To summarize the important
definitions
and parts of Dianetics and Scientology from a text and (2) Ask
interestingly for
an application to life.
Now you see why I want your swift help in writing it. It would
take one
person months. Your contribution, as assigned in this bulletin, will
speed it up
by months.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:md.rd
Distribution:
Not to be stencilled in London (their copies being sent direct from
DC).
Info copies going to Melbourne, SA, and all field offices, via HCOs;
3 copies-1 for HCO, 1 to D of T, 1 to D of P.
276
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812. 19th Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 JANUARY 1959
Full Distribution
(CHANGE OF HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 DECEMBER 1958)
Step 6 is deleted from HCA/HPA Curriculum and added to HCS/BScn
section.
No E-Meter is used or taught in HCA/HPA courses. Comm lag is
taught instead.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:gn.rd
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HASI POLICY LETTER OF 19 JANUARY 1959
EXTRA WEEKS ON HPA COURSE
The following is policy in relation to students who could not
make the
grade in the eight weeks HPA Course:
If the course was paid in whole, in advance, the student is
entitled to
free weeks to finish his training.
If he has not paid in advance he is only permitted eight weeks.
Extra weeks will cost �7.1O.O per week.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:mp.vmm.cden
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard .
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
277
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 MAY 1959
(Convert into a Sec'l ED)
HPA/BSCN "RETREADS"
There is no such thing as an HPA/BScn retread fee.
If an HPA wants to retread to new HPA course, he can pay the
usual price
per week for training (about 15 gns).
I know there is now a mish-mash in training because of a new
course more
basic than old courses. We'll just have to cope.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:cden
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 AUGUST 1959
CenO
STUDENTS ATTENDING COURSES
Students are allowed to do Extension Courses and attend another
Central
Organisation for their actual training if this be more convenient.
Normally
students would get their Extension Course material from the nearest
Central
Organisation, and would attend the course there.
HCO Secretary WW
NW:brb.gh.rd
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
278
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 AUGUST 1959
CenOCon
CERTIFICATIONS
In order to get an HPA/HCA or BScn/HCS Certificate, it is not
necessary
to wait one year.
It is necessary, however, that the student be fully trained and
have all
Extension Course work completed and corrected.
NW:brb.rd HCO Secretary WW
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 FEBRUARY 1960
(Reissued from Sthil)
CenOCon
HCO Board of Review
HPA QUALIFICATIONS
Policy states that an HPA/HCA certificate may not be awarded
until all
requirements including Extension Course, are completed.
However, students who have completed the academy course and have
graduated
successfully and have passed the HCO Board of Review examination are
in fact
entitled to start practising professionally even though they may not
have
completed the Extension Course work.
Sometimes also a student may have passed all the requirements
and yet may
not be in possession of a certificate because he has not completed
paying for
the course.
In all such cases, provided that the HCO Board of Review is
satisfied that
the student is fully competent to start practising professionally, the
student
should be given a letter of Certificate Pending by the HCO Board of
Review. This
letter would give the student a grace period to complete his
qualifications, say
6 or 8 months, and would state that he is entitled to audit
professionally
during this period. Each letter would be dated and would state the
limit of the
grace period, set according to the individual's circumstances.
This procedure would regularize the position of the new auditor
who is
waiting for his certificate, and will also encourage the individual
concerned to
complete his requirements, including paying off his account.
Peter Hemery
LRH:js.mm.cden HCO Secretary
WW
Copyright ($) 1960 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. Ron
Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
279
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 APRIL 1960
BPI
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
HUBBARD APPRENTICE SCIENTOLOGIST
Have all present lifetime overts and withholds cleared and taken
responsibility for. Have done the same with one other person. Account
paid
in full for HAS course. Any infraction theses completed. HCO Board of
Review
will be the authority on the overt/withholds requirement and this must
be
cleared through HCO Board of Review. This applied only to Academy HAS.
HPA/HCA
HUBBARD PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR/HUBBARD CERTIFIED AUDITOR
8 weeks of training, all passed. 8 weekly reports submitted.
Synopsis
of Dianetics '55. Account paid in full for HCA course. International
Membership
in force. HCA Extension Course completed. Any infraction theses
completed. The
HCA examination passed-this consists of examination of the following:
Verbatim
knowledge and understanding of the Codes (Auditor's and
Scientologist's), Axioms
of Scientology, Pre-Logics and Logics (this includes footnotes),
Scales and
definitions. Ability to open and close sessions; to handle ARC breaks
and pc
originations; usage of CCH processes 1-4 smoothly and well; usage of
the Hubbard
Electrometer (E-Meter).
Your case level must be high enough to be entrusted with a pc
(this is as
per the APA and IQ test as well as personal inspection by HCO Board of
Review).
Three case histories of pcs audited to state of release, after
training at
the Academy. Release: a case on which all the charge of current
lifetime overts
and withholds has been audited off and taken responsibility for.
Ability to run PE and HAS Co-audit Course.
Ability to recognize and produce four basic needle reactions on
E-Meter.
Ability to assess a case with an E-Meter (this is very important).
HCO Board of Review is the certifying authority.
B.ScN/HCS
BACHELOR OF SCIENTOLOGY/HUBBARD CLEARING SCIENTOLOGIST
6 weeks of training, all passed. 6 weeks' reports submitted.
B.Scn/HCS
Extension Course requirements completed. Account . for B.Scn/HCS
Course paid
in full. B.Scn/HCS Examination passed. Have an HPA/HCA certificate
International
Membership in force. Any infraction theses completed.
The student must be a good enough auditor that he is employable
at the
Hubbard Guidance Center (this includes own case level, as in HPA/HCA
requirements). The student must be able to clear individual pcs. The
students
must be able to use the E-Meter excellently.
A time limit for completion of HCA/HPA and B .Scn/HCS
certificates has
been set. It is twelve months from the end of Academy training to
HCA/HPA
HCS/B.Scn standard.
This is effective on all HCA/HPA B .Scn students finishing their
Academy
training after 5th March 1960.
280
Those students who have completed their HCA/HPA or B.Scn/HCS
training on
or before the 5th March, 1960, to be given a twelve month grace period
in which
to complete all requirements; this is to end on 4th March, 1961, with
the
financial requirement ~to be as other requirements, or the date due of
the note,
whichever is the later. It is also proposed that a student shall not
be
penalized for enthusiasm and desire to advance in Scientology and that
with this
in mind, if the student completes Academy training to HCS standard
within six
(6) months of completion of the HCA training, he will have a maximum
time limit
for completion of both certificate requirements of 24 months, dated
from the
completion of the HCA course Academy training. In the event of the
student
completing HCS training before having completed the HCA, as has
occurred, the
time limit shall be eighteen (18) months, dated from the end of the
HCS, for
the completion of both certificate requirements.
It is proposed that failure to;complete Academy requirements
within twelve
(12) months (or as amended above) of the completion of Academy
training will
bring about the transfer of the candidate's files from the "student
incomplete"
category to be classified as "student incomplete, disqualified HCA (or
HCS)" in
the Academy files and Addressograph plates.
RECEIPT OF A CERTIFICATE BY L. RON HUBBARD, SEALED AND NUMBERED
IS THE
FIRST TIME THE AUDITOR HAS PROFESSIONAL STATUS AS SUCH (THIS APPLIES
TO HPA/HCA
AND B~SCN/HCS ONLY-HAS IS NOT A PROFESSIONAL SCIENTOLOGIST'S
CERTIFICATE).
LRH:js.rd Rosamond Harper
Copyright ($) 1960 HCO Technical
Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 MAY 1960
CenOCon
ACCEPTANCE FOR ACC AND ACADEMY COURSES
It is now Policy that no students be accepted for an ACC or any
other
training course conducted by a Scientology Organization who have a
chronic
bodily condition for which they are under medical care and/or taking
drugs.
These students should be encouraged to take an Intensive at
H.G.C.
until their condition is resolved and they are off drugs.
The reason for this ruling is that, for example, on a recent
ACC, the
only two blow-oils have been (1) a student who was on 30 grains a
night of
Sodium Bromide, Chloral Hydrate and gentian and who sometimes took as
much
as 90 grains and (2) another student under drugs from her physician
for a
dropsical condition. This student was given only five months to live,
five
years ago, and was taking the ACC on her own risk.
Cases such as the above need intensive auditing before
attempting a
course such as an ACC. A smoother gradient. is indicated, and this
could be
done by getting the condition resolved through auditing first, before
allowing
the student on to the course.
LRH:js.rd Rosamond Harper
Copyright ($) 1960 HCO Technical
Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
281
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 OCTOBER 1960
CenOCon
CASE ASSESSMENTS FOR STUDENTS
It sometimes happens that a student can graduate from an HPA/HCA
course
and pass the exam, and yet fail in the field on account of a low case
level or
poor subjective reality on Scientology.
To prevent this, it is now policy that after an HPA/HCA student
has passed
the HCO Board of Review examination, and before a certificate is
issued, he
shall be required to have from the HCO Board of Review a case
assessment. If it
is found that their case is in poor shape, or that they have little
subjective
reality on Scientology, they must be ordered to processing before
their
certificate can be issued.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
HCO
Secretary WW
for
LRH:js.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 NOVEMBER 1960
HCOs .
Central Orgs
HPA/HCA COURSE
To avoid any confusion that may exist; it is emphasized that the
Academy HPA/HCA Course is basically an eight week course, and is sold
as
such. The student pays for any extra weeks he may take.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
HCO Secretary WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
282
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex.
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 NOVEMBER 1960
All Central Orgs
NEW ORG PROGRAMMES
I have been extremely busy designing new programmes for Central
Orgs and
getting all their bits and pieces together here in Johannesburg for
use in other
Orgs.
Testing as a service is pulling well on very flimsy advertising
here in
Johannesburg. A classified ad is pulling better than any such ad has
pulled
here before.
Testing, open from 1:30 to 9:00 or thereabouts does all testing
including
PE, and is now steadily rising. It was 17 people a day as of
yesterday.
To handle this flow I have reorganised PE Course to Monday,
Wednesday
and Fridays, put an Anatomy of the Human Mind Basic Course (HAS) for
1Ogns
running 10 weeks, enrolling before any lecture (not every 10 weeks). I
have
put in Group Auditing, old Vol 1 and 2 Group Auditing style, 5 nights
a week,
6:00 to 7:00 pm, 5 shillings a night. HAS Co-audit is suspended for
lack of
space but may go back in in addition to above.
Also I've designed a night HCA/HPA to enroll every week (mostly
every
week) 16 weeks long with a Basic Course added to it (but not ahead of
it). It
runs Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
I've converted day HCA/HPA to enrolling every Monday using 2
instructors
each in both night and day course.
I have found that an Org that doesn't have service like PE above
will lose
people brought in by testing.
Also, more important, an Org that does not enroll a day and a
night
HCA/HPA every week quickly begins to depend on processing alone with
its
expensive overheads and so over-burdens the HGC and runs the Academy
at a loss
or nearly so. To keep the unit up they can only sell processing!
HCA/HPA courses
that enroll every few weeks or months make an Org into a clinic which
does not
disseminate Scientology. Trained auditors disseminate. Pcs rarely do
to any
extent.
I told you that I was going to shape up Central Org depts with
Johannesburg as the model, and this is getting busy and successful and
I'm very
happy the way it's going.
I'll be sending more definite data soon.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:js.aap
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
283
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 NOVEMBER 1960
All Cen Orgs for info
For SA only
ANATOMY OF THE HUMAN MIND COURSE
AS A PRE-REQUISITE FOR HPA TRAINING
The Anatomy of the Human Mind Course will become a pre-requisite
for
HPA Training, effective immediately.
Should a student sign up for and pay for an HPA Course
(effective
immediately) he shall be entitled to attend the Anatomy of the Human
Mind
Course free of any further charge.
Should a student sign up for the Anatomy of the Human Mind
Course and
while still on that course decide to follow up with an HPA Course, the
fee he
has paid for the Anatomy of the Human Mind Course shall be deductible
from the
gross HPA fee.
If a potential student makes use of a grant given to him by a
field
auditor it should be made quite clear that the fee of 75 guineas (125
guineas
less grant of 50 guineas) is net. There are no further discounts or
allowances
and after April 1, 1961 the Anatomy of the Human Mind Course will be a
pre-
requisite and the student must take this Course and pay for it.
Jack Parkhouse
LRH:js:rd Assoc Sec-HASI SA
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1961
Cen Orgs [Excerpt]
Copy for each
Staff Hat
Not for Franchise THE ACADEMY OF SCIENTOLOGY
Headed by the Director of Training, the Academy is responsible
for
the technical excellence of Scientology practice tomorrow.
Teaching two different courses in the same classes, the Academy
trains
Hubbard Practical Scientologists and Hubbard Professional (HPA/HCA)
Auditors.
The Academy also teaches an upper level course once or more a
year known
as the B.Scn (Hubbard Clearing Scientologist) Course.
Precise scheduling, crisp training and true, direct answers to
the
students' questions makes an Academy.
The HPA/HCA Course enrolls more or less every Monday unless the
total
average unit is to be gained expensively through individual processing
only.
The Practical course is the same as the old professional course
except
that it is for people "Who don't want to practice Scientology
professionally".
The professional course is a tougher version with more requirements.
A had Academy results in a bad HGC tomorrow as many graduates
become staff
auditors.
A good Academy is known by its snappy scheduling and the degree
of basic
data and action the student actually absorbs.
LRH:aec.js.rd
Copyright ($) 1961 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: A full copy of this Policy Letter, The Pattern of a Central
Organization,
appears in Volume 7, page 147.]
284
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1961
Academies
HCA/HPA RUNDOWN
OR PRACTICAL COURSE RUNDOWN
FOR ACADEMIES
The following rundown (attached) was designed by myself and
Peter
Slabbert, Director of Training in Johannesburg.
It will be seen that a student can enter tile day course any
week and
the evening course every two weeks.
There are only two units, thus requiring only two instructors.
Comm Course will soon be getting taught again for HAS in the PE
Foundation, so this should give enough comm course.
If in doubt about any of this, write Director of Training, HASI
Johannesburg, P0 Box 10795, Johannesburg, South Africa, who should
reply via
HCO Tech Sec, Saint Hill.
This is the official HPA/HCA Academy Training Schedule and forms
the
basis of future examination. HPA/HCA has additional requirements. This
is the
totality of training for Hubbard Practical Scientologist.
Directors of Training should shift to this schedule as soon as
possible
in all Central Organizations.
LRH:ph.rd
Copyright ($) 1961 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HPA LECTURE SCHEDULE
1. Pre-Logics 14. Definitions of: Formal
Auditing,
Tone 40 Auditing, Muzzled
Auditing
2. Logics
15. Group Processing
3. Scientology Axioms
16. Running PE Courses
4. Code of a Scientologist
17. Running HAS Co-Audit Courses
5. Code of Honour
18. Knowingness Control
Responsibility
6. The Factors
19. ARC
7. Scales
20. Victims
8. Definitions
21. Franchise
9. Native State and first four
postulate chain 22. Parts of Man
10. Assists 23. Havingness and Duplication
11. The 8 Dynamics 24. SAPA Interpretation
12. The 4 Universes 25. How help became betrayal
13. Obsessive and Unknowing Games 26. Flat point
Condition
Copyright ($) 1960 by L. Ron Hubbard
All rights reserved
285
WEEK 1 (Unit I)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Briefing | | | |
| |
| | on Course| | | |
| |
| |8C, Requir| | | |
| |
| |ements, | | | |
| |
| Tape |Weekly rpt| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| |Ext Crse | 14S/HPA | 15S/HPA | 16S/HPA | 17S/HPA
| |
| |etc. Coach| | | |
| |
| |Auditor Pc| | | |
| |
| |Student- | | | |
| |
| | HATs | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| | |Comm Fmula | TR 2 |Duplication |Auditor's
| |
|Lecture/ |Confrontng| & TR 1 | |and Comm | Code
| |
|Briefing | TR 0 | Axiom 28 | |bridges TR 3|&
Handling| |
| | | Mechanics | | | Origina-
| |
| | | of Control| | | tions
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
|TR Sess. | TR 0 | TR 1 | TR2 | TR3 | TR4
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
|TR Sess. | TB 0 | TR 1 | TB 2 | TB 3 | TR 4
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ | TR 0 |Comm Fmula | TR 2 |Duplication | Handling
| |
|Briefing | | | |and Hvngness|Orginatns
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
|TR Sess. | TR 0 | TR 1 | TR2 | TR3 | TR4
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
|TR Sess. | TB 0 | TR 1 | TB 2 | TB 3 | TR 4
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
|TR Sess. | TR 0 | TR 1 | TR2 | TR3 | TR4
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
|TR Sess. | TB 0 | TR 1 | TB 2 | TB 3 | TR 4
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. # 6 |Lect. # 7 | Lect. # 8 |Lect. #10. |Lect. #
17| |
| |5th London|5th London | 5th London |5th London |5th
London| |
| | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
WEEK 2 (Unit I)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Briefing | | | |
| |
| | on Course| | | |
| |
| |8C, Requir| | | |
| |
| |ements, | | | |
| |
| Tape |Weekly rpt| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| |Ext Crse | 18S/HPA | 19S/HPA | 20S/HPA | 21S/HPA
| |
| |etc. Coach| | | |
| |
| |Auditor Pc| | | |
| |
| |Student- | | | |
| |
| | HATs | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| | | | | |
| |
|Lecture/ | E-Meter | Tone | Dating | Dating |
| |
|Briefing | Reactions| Arm | Using | Using | Dynamic
| |
| | Setting | Positions | Arm | Meter
|Assessment| |
| | Calib Etc| | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
|TR Sess. | See Lect | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "A" | Above | Reactions | Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|-----------------------
| 11.15 |
|TR Sess. | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "B" | Reactions| Reactions | Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
|Briefing | Reactions| Reactions| Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
|TR Sess. | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "A" | Reactions| Reactions| Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
|TR Sess. | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "B" | Reactions| Reactions| Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
|TR Sess. | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "A" | Reactions| Reactions| Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
|TR Sess. | E-Meter | E-Meter | Dating | Dating | Dynamic
| |
| "B" | Reactions| Reactions | Using Arm | Using
Meter|Assessment| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. # 1 | Lect. # 2 | Lect. # 7 | Lect. #8 |Lect. #14
| |
| |6th London| 6th London| 6th London | 6th London |6th
London| |
| | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
________|
286
WEEK 3 (Unit I)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Briefing | | | |
| |
| | on Course| | | |
| |
| |8C, Requir| | | |
| |
| |ements, | | | |
| |
| Tape |Weekly rpt| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| |Ext Crse | 22S/HPA | 23S/HPA | 24S/HPA | 25S/HPA
| |
| |etc. Coach| | | |
| |
| |Auditor Pc| | | |
| |
| |Student- | | | |
| |
| | HATs | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| | | | | |
| |
|Lecture/ | Upper | | Tone 40 | Chart of | Spotting
| |
|Briefing | Indoc | TR 7 | Auditing | Attitudes | Buttons
| |
| | & TR 6 | | | | & TR 9
| |
| | | | | | Coaching
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
|TR Sess. |TR6 String| TR 7 | TR 8 | TR 8 | TR 9
| |
| "A" |bodies non| | | |
| |
| |verbal 8c | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
|TR Sess. |TR6 String| TR 7 | TR 8 | TR 8 | TR 9
| |
| "B" |bodies non| | | |
| |
| |verbal 8c | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ |Control in| TR 7 | TR 8 | TR 8 | TR 9
| |
|Briefing | Auditing | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
|TR Sess. | TR 6 | TR 7 | TR 8 | TR 9 | TR 9
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
|TR Sess. | TB 6 | TR 7 | TB 8 | TB 9 | TR 9
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
|TR Sess. | TR 6 | TR 7 | TR 8 | TR 9 | TR 9
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
|TR Sess. | TB 6 | TR 7 | TB 8 | TB 9 | TR 9
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. # 1 | Lect. # 5 | Lect. # 7 | Lect. #9 |Lect. #
25| |
| |1st Melb | 1st Melb | 1st Melb | 1st Melb |1st
Melbon| |
| | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
WEEK 4 (Unit I)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Briefing | | | |
| |
| | on Course| | | |
| |
| |8C, Requir| | | |
| |
| |ements, | | | |
| |
| Tape |Weekly rpt| Tape 26 | Tape 26 | Lect #1 | Lect #3
| |
| |Ext Crse | Part 1 | Part 2 & 3 | State of | State of
| |
| |etc. Coach| S/HPA | S/HPA | Man | Man
| |
| |Auditor Pc| | | Congress | Congress
| |
| |Student- | | | |
| |
| | HATs | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| | | | | PTP Cause |
| |
|Lecture/ | Anti Q&A | Model | Model | of rising | Goals
| |
|Briefing | TR 0 | Session | Session | TA between | in
| |
| | | | | Sessions |
Rudiments| |
| | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
|TR Sess. | Anti Q&A | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "A" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
|TR Sess. | Anti Q&A | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "B" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ | TR 0 | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
|Briefing | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
|TR Sess. | TR 0 | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "A" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
|TR Sess. | TB 0 | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "B" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
|TR Sess. | TR 0 | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "A" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
|TR Sess. | TB 0 | Model | Model | Model | Model
| |
| "B" | | Session | Session | Session | Session
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. #26 | Lect. #27 | Lect. #29 | Lect. #30 |Lect. # 1
| |
| |1st Melb |1st Melb | 1st Melb | 1st Melb | 1st Melb
| |
| | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
________|
287
WEEK 1 (Unit 2)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| Lecture | ------------ SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE ------------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.15 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| | 1 S/HPA | 2 S/HPA | 3 S/HPA | 4 S/HPA | 5 S/HPA
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.30 |
| Lecture | ------------ SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE ------------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
| Briefing |------------- SIX TYPES OF PROCESSES ----------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.30 |
| Auditing |
| |
| Team "A" |------------- SIX TYPES OF PROCESSES ----------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
| Lecture | ------------ SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE ------------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
| Auditing |
| |
| Team "A" |------------- SIX TYPES OF PROCESSES ----------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.30 |
| Lecture | ------------ SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE ------------------------
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape | Granting | Route 1 | Route 1 | Route 1-12 | ARC Tri-
| |
| |of Bngness|(4,5,6,7) | 8,9,10,11 | 13, 14 15 |angle
15th| |
| | 2nd ACC | St of man | St of man | St of man | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
WEEK 2 (Unit 2)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Purpose &| Purpose & | | |
| |
| Lecture/ | Running | Running | | |
| |
| Tape | Op Pro by| Op Pro by | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| | Dup | Dup | 6 S/HPA | 7 S/HPA | 8 S/HPA
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| Lecture | | | Deff, Desc, & Demo of "THING"
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | | | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
| Team | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "A" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
| Team. | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "B" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
| Lecture | | | Deff, Desc, & Demo of "THING"
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | | | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
| Team | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "A" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
| Team. | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "B" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | | | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
| Team | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "A" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
| Team. | | | Finding, Handling & becoming cause
| |
| "B" | | | over THING on other students
| |
|----------| | |------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape | | | Comm & | Exact 10. | Uses of
| |
| | | | Is-ness | Control | Control
| |
| | | | 17th ACC | 17th ACC | 17th ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
________|
288
WEEK 3 (Unit 2)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | | | | |
| |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| | 9S/HPA | 10S/HPA | 11S/HPA | 12S/HPA | 13S/HPA
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
| | | | | |
| |
|Lecture/ | Lecture | Lecture | Control in | SCS | Auditing
| |
|Briefing | on CCH's | on CCH's | Sessions | How to run | SCS
| |
| | 1 and 2 | 2 and 3 | Reality | |
| |
| | | | Scale | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
| Team | CCH 1 | CCH 2 | CCH 3 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 11.15 |
| Team | CCH 1 | CCH 2 | CCH 3 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ | CCH 1 | CCH 2 & 3 | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
|Briefing | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
| Team | CCH 1 | CCH 3 | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.15 |
| Team | CCH 1 | CCH 3 | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.10 |
|TR Sess. | CCH 1 | CCH 3 | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "A" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.50 |
|TR Sess. | CCH 1 | CCH 3 | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
| "B" | | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. # 6 |Lect. # 7 | Lect. # 8 |Lect. #10. |Lect. #
17| |
| |5th London|5th London | 5th London |5th London |5th
London| |
| | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC | ACC
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
(Unit 3)
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
|SECTION | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
8.30 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
| | Lect #5 | | | |
| |
| Tape | State of | Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
| | Man | 1S/HPA | 2S/HPA | 3S/HPA | 4S/HPA
| |
| | Congress | | | |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 9.30 |
|Lecture/ |-------------FORMULA 15 AUDITING RUNDOWN AND PROCEDURE-----
| |
|Briefing |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 10.15 |
| Auditing | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula
| |
| | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.15 |
|Lecture/ |-------------FORMULA 15 AUDITING RUNDOWN AND PROCEDURE-----
| |
|Briefing |
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 12.30 |
| LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH | LUNCH
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 1.30 |
| Auditing | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula
| |
| | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 2.55 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 3.05 |
| Auditing | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula | Formula
| |
| | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 4.30 |
| Tape |Lect. # 2 |Lect. # 3 | Granting | Route I | Route I
| |
| | HCS | HCS |of Beingness| (4,5,6,7) |
8,9,10,11| |
| | Course | Course | 2nd ACC | St of Man |St of man
| |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|----------
| 5.30 |
FORMULA 15: Clean up terminals in Scientology, Instructors, etc and
also
people who object to Scientology..
289
WEEK 1 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|--_----|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| TAPE | TAPE | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| TR 0 | Comm Formula | TR 1
| |
| | | Axiom 28, Mech |
| |
| | | of Control |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team A | TR 0 | TR 0 | TR 1
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| Team B | TR 0 | TR 0 | TR 1
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 2 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| TR 2 | TR 3 | TR 4
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| | | |
| |
| Team A | TR 2 | TR 3 | TR 4
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team B | TR 2 | TR 3 | TR 4
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 3 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| TAPE | TAPE (Clear 8C) | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| TR 6 | TR 7 | TR 8
| |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team A | TR 6 | TR 7 | TR 8
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| Team B | TR 6 | TR 7 | TR 8
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 4 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|--_----|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| TR 8 | TR 9 |Spotting Btns
| |
| | | |TR & Coaching
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| Team A | TR 8 | TR 9 | TR 9
| |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team B | TR 8 | TR 9 | TR 9
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| TAPE | TAPE | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
290
WEEK 5 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|--_----|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| TAPE | TAPE (Clear 8C) | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| E-Meter | TA Positions | Dating using
| |
| | Reactions | | Arms
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team "A" | E-Meter Reactns | E-Meter Reactns | Dtg usng
Arms| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| Team "B" | TR 0 | E-Meter Reactns | Dtg usng
Arms| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 6 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| Dating with Meter| Dynamic Assmnt |Dynamic
Assmnt| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| | | |
| |
| Team A | Dating with Meter| Dynamic Assmnt |Dynamic
Assmnt| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team B | Dating with Meter| Dynamic Assmnt |Dynamic
Assmnt| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 7 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| TAPE | TAPE (Clear 8C) | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| Anti Q & A | Relevant/ |
| |
| | | Irrelevant | Model
Session| |
| | | Question |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team A | Anti Q & A | Relevant/ | Model
Session| |
|-----------------|------------------| Irrelevant |--------------
| 9.35 |
| Team B | Anti Q & A | Question | Model
Session| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 8 UNIT 1
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|--_----|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| Model Session | Cause of Rising | Goals in
| |
| | | TA Between Sess | Rudiments
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| Team A | Model Session | Model Session | Model
Session| |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.40 |
| Team B | Model Session | Model Session | Model
Session| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| TAPE | TAPE | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
291
WEEK 1 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| Briefing |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| Team A |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| Team B |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.15 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 3 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing|---Definition, Desc, & Demo of "Thing"-------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| | | |
| |
| Team A |---Finding, Handling & Becoming cause over "Thing"-
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B |---Finding, Handling & Becoming cause over "Thing"-
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.15 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 2 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| Briefing |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| Team A |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| Team B |----------------6 TYPES OF PROCESSES---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.00 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.15 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 4 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing|---Definition, Desc, & Demo of "Thing"-------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.30 |
| | | |
| |
| Team A |---Finding, Handling & Becoming cause over "Thing"-
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B |---Finding, Handling & Becoming cause over "Thing"-
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.15 |
| Lecture |----------------SEE LECTURE SCHEDULE---------------
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
| SUNDAY 8.30-9.00 Purpose of Op-Pro-by-Dup
|
| 9.00-5.30 Running of Op-Pro-by-Dup
|
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
292
WEEK 5 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| CCH 1 | CCH 2 | CCH 3
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| Team A | CCH 1 | CCH 2 | CCH 3
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B | CCH 1 | CCH 2 | CCH 3
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| |
| SUNDAY 8.30-9.00 Purpose of Op-Pro-by-Dup
| |
| 9.00-5.30 Running Op-Pro-by-Dup
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 6 UNIT 2
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| | | |
| |
| Team A | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B | CCH 4 | SCS | SCS
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.30 |
| Tape | Tape | Tape | Tape
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 1 UNIT 3
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| Auditing Rundown | Auditing R/D | Auditing R/D
| |
| | Formula 15 | Formula 15 | Formula 15
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| Team A | Formula 15 | Formula 15 | Formula 15
| |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B | Formula 15 | Formula 15 | Formula 15
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| TAPE | TAPE | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
WEEK 2 UNIT 3
______________________________________________________________________
_______
| SECTION | MONDAY | WEDNESDAY | FRIDAY
| TIME |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
|-------|
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.00 |
| Lecture/Briefing| Auditing Rundown | Auditing R/D | Auditing R/D
| |
| | | |TR & Coaching
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 7.15 |
| Team A | Formula 15 | Formula 15 | Formula 15
| |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.15 |
| BREAK | BREAK | BREAK | BREAK
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 8.30 |
| Team B | Formula 15 | Formula 15 | Formula 15
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 9.35 |
| TAPE | TAPE | TAPE | TAPE
| |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------
| 10.30 |
|______________________________________________________________________
_______|
293
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 APRIL 1961
CenOCon
HCO LTD HPA/HCA CERTIFICATE CONDITIONS
The following are the current requirements and conditions for
obtaining
an HPA/HCA certificate:
Complete Practical Course.
Complete Anatomy Course.
Pay �l31.5.0 total (which includes the �100 fee for the
Practical
Scientology Course).
Receive any required auditing to case level standard (set by HCO
Board
of Review).
Pass Practical (Academy) Course (Repeat necessary weeks at no
extra cost).
Pass HCO Board of Review Oral.
Pass Written Examination 85%.
Complete HGC Training (which includes 50 hours of auditing for
the
Organization).
International Professional Membership held,
For validation, it is necessary also to complete an HPA/HCA
Extension
Course and certain other requirements, as stipulated by the HCO Board
of Review.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jl.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
294
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 APRIL 1961
CenOCon
TRAINING, PROFESSIONAL
NEW POLICY
(Cancels any policy that may contradict it)
The Purpose of the Academy (or an HGC when training staff) is to
make
the student letter perfect technically before going on to any other
training.
Theories and processes can be picked up in books and from tapes
as well
as in classes. Technical skill cannot be picked up anywhere but in an
Academy
or HGC training unit, a fact proven by years of observation.
Therefore the 1000 to 1 stress of an Academy (or HGC training
unit) must
be Technical Perfection.
The following comprise at this writing what is meant by
technical skill:
1. Command of the TRs, revised 1961.
2. Command of Model Session.
3. Command of the B-Meter.
4. Command of rudiments detection and process.
All these are covered in unit I of present schedule. Therefore
it follows
that a student can't get out of Unit I until he or she is perfect, if
it takes
a year.
Don't necessarily keep a professional student in the week he
flunked. You
can let him go on through Unit 1 (but not to Unit 2). But put on an
evening
coaching class, paying an evening instructor to teach additional
technical
subject time.
No student enrolling after the date of receipt of this HCO Pol
Ltr may be
given a course completion as a professional auditor until he has been
given and
has passed an examination as follows.
1. Perfect performance on the TRs 0 to 9.
2. Perfect command of a Model Session.
3. Perfect control arid knowledge of an E-Meter.
4. Perfect handling of rudiments and rudiments processes.
The student must get 100% on the above.
A written examination on the subjects of Unit 2 in HPA/HPS/HCS
Training
or in the theory taught on a higher course should also be given and
must be
passed with a grade of 80%.
The Unit One examination may be given when the student completes
Unit One.
In examining on Technical (Unit One) the student must be
unshakably
confident of his or her skill.
Lack of this skill rather than lack of theory and/or processes
has
nullified the results of those auditors who have not been successfully
taught
on 1-4 above (Unit One) technical skills.
SOP Goals application has searchlighted the necessities outlined
in
this bulletin.
Letting art auditor out of the Academy without the basic skills
down
perfectly is opening the door to failure.
Be tough!
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jl.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
295
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1961
HCO Bd Rev
Academy
Ext Course
EXTENSION COURSE
The requirement that Extension Course students who begin the
HPA/HCA
or the BScn/HCS Courses turn in to the Academy all their completed
Extension
Course lessons is no longer required, as in student files completed
lesson
slips are kept, and the addition of keeping all their written or typed
lessons
would jam Academy files.
LRH:jl.rd Mary Sue Hubbard
Copyright ($) 1961 HCO Treasurer WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 MAY 1961
CenOCon
MODIFICATION OF HPA/HCA, BScn/HCS
SCHEDULE
The following modifications of the HPA/HCA and BScn/HCS Training
Schedules
are to be put into immediate use by all Academies.
HPA/HCA
UNIT I consists of:
1. Command of the TRs, 1 to 9 Revised.
2. Command of the Model Session. (See Note 1)
3. Command of the B-Meter.
4. Command of rudiments detection and processes.
Note 1. Model Session to be run against the TRs. (Student flunked for
poor TR 0,
TR 1, TR 2, TR 3, TR 4 and TR 5/0.)
UNIT 2 consists of:-
1. The 36 Pre-sessions.
2. The Havingness and Confront process for the PC,
3. General Assessment and running pcs on Pre.havingness scale and
for
assessment on Pre-Hav of terminals (not SOP Goals).
4. Joburg Security Check, How to do one.
Tapes are to be listened to after Academy hours.
Axioms to be learned in student's own time.
Goal: To make a Release.
----------
BScn/HCS
Establishes full technical perfection on E-Meter, Model Session
and
TRs. Teaches SOP Goals fully.
Goal: To make a Stable Mest Clear.
LRH:jl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
296
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT COLOUR
FLASH
RED ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JUNE 1961
Central Orgs
ACADEMY SCHEDULE, CLARIFICATION OF
There is apparently a considerable confusion going on as to what
should
be taught in an Academy. Some schedules and advices from various
people have
been handed about that didn't really duplicate the intention well, and
I have
not before clarified since the issue of the Pre Hay.
A review of Academies and auditors and their skills at the time
of
examination, and in application for and early service in HGCs, shows
that
Academies have for some time been in violation of one of the stable
data about
new auditors. A new auditor should be trained up to a point where he
or she can
be employed at once as a staff auditor and put on a pc without the D
of P giving
them endless hours of additional training.
This does not mean that all auditors graduating should be
employed by the
HGC. It means all graduating should be capable of being employed. Why?
Well,
these auditors are going out to audit and haven't got a D of P to
further train
them, so they are being handed a career failure if they cannot audit
people
without further training.
The attention of all Assn Secs and Ds of T is vigorously called
to the
technical calibre desired from an academy student and the necessary
training
reality.
You are not training auditors if when they graduate they cannot
audit. Now
whatever schedules, classes and other fancy ways of dodging the
necessity to
confront students have been employed, just tear them all up. They are
not a good
substitute for training. Because we have all been trained in the
educational
system circa mid-twentieth century we are liable to think that forming
people up
into classes and getting them to jump over books on schedule will
educate them.
Well it won't. We are here to train auditors not to educate them. So
just train
them.
How?
Well you do it by check sheet. You make up a check sheet of all
the items
this person must actually know in order to practise auditing
effectively. Then
each time the person passes a level he is examined and checked off on
the check
sheet, and goes on.
Here is the leader in all this data: You can dawdle around with
theory
outside an academy, read books and so on. But in an academy only can
you LEARN
certain things and not all the books in the world will teach them.
These things are as follows: the TRs 0 to 9, the Model Session
while
obeying the TRs, the B-Meter, the CCHs, the Pre Hay Scale and its use
in
assessment. The running of general Pre Hay levels, how to do a
Security Check.
Those are the things they can't learn anywhere else. Therefore
all
training should not be of a class, for this terminal called a class
will never
audit anybody. All training should be of' student individuals who will
audit
people, for only an individual student, not a class, will do any
auditing.
Now you will also find that if the student doesn't listen to at
least
fifty taped lectures of mine he won't know the mood or flavor of all
this, and
so will develop rather weird ideas of what we're all about and charge
around
making nothing out of people, so a daily hour of tape is quite
important for the
whole eight weeks the student is there.
297
All right, he also has to know the Auditor's Code. And he should
know
the Code of a Scientologist. And he should know his axioms.
What else? Not another blistering cotton picking thing, that's
what.
NOTHING else. If you try to teach anything else you've had it.
So your check list should be composed of the various parts of
just those
things. Now all this frantic motion of getting the student into
classes and
regimented doesn't fit in with what we're doing. So it is pure
silliness to say
"How can we enter a student in a Comm course when we only run one
every few
weeks and er what gee can't well er can't dogs alter-is let's see
"
Actually the first and last part of the sentence makes the same sense.
NEITHER
make any sense of course.
So you have two UNITS. These two units are called unit one and
unit two.
They are not so called because of weeks present or cats on the belfry
or diabums
on the scollery. They are called units one and two because the
students in unit
one are studying techniques and the students in unit two are studying
processes
or applications.
Thus we know a unit one student not by the colour of his glasses
or his
voucher of payment. We know him because he has a check sheet in his
paw which
says unit one on the top of it and which has under it Code of an
Auditor, the
listed TRs, the Model Session, the B-Meter and the CCHs. Then we have
a unit
two student and he is obvious not because he has a time Clock in his
hand but
because we can clearly see that he has in his paw a sheet which has on
it Code
of a Scientologist, the Pre Hay Scale, Assessments how to do, commands
how to
make up, Security Checking, and character of auditing review and the
axioms,
and then follows a list of fifty or sixty tapes.
All these items have little tails after them four times so he
can be
examined four times by instructors and flunked the first three.
Now when he gets out he can take an extension course and
complete his
theory, but he can also do a creditable job of Routine one and Routine
two as
covered in HCO Bulletin of June 5, 1961.
No classes. He reports. He works with other students. He sweats
it out.
He gets no auditing, but may be security checked and security check
other
students. He may assess people, but as long as he is in unit one he
only
concentrates on mechanics, and in unit two before he is perfect
perfect perfect
perfect perfect perfect perfectin unit one. He can only leave unit two
until he
is safe safe safe safe safe safe to employ at once in the HGC. A
student may not
be examined by HCO until those check sheets are all initialled as
perfect by
instructors.
What's this do to training? It demands that our instructors are
all letter
perfect on the above material and that they impart the personal touch
to every
student, and not in big masses but with hammers on individual heads.
I herewith forbid classes and authorise only one daily seminar.
I forbid
more than the above to be taught in the Academy. I forbid as well
length of time
present to operate as any criteria of the skill of an auditor.
Now that's an academy. Write down your questions and mail them
to me fast.
Then read this again for it's all I will say.
LRH:jl.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: This HCO B has been corrected per HCO P/L 9 October 1961,
HPA/HCA Rundown Change, which moved the Auditor's Code from unit two to
unit one.]
298
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 AUGUST 1961
CenOCon
HPA/HCA POLICY
No HCA/HPA course may be offered or run outside a Central
Organization.
In event of a City Office conducting such a course, arrangements
must
be made with HCO Continental Exec Sec in any given area.
All former permissions to conduct HCA/HPA courses are cancelled
herewith
save only in Central Organizations.
SPECIAL COURSES
The conduct of Special courses of professional quality may be
undertaken
only after arrangement with HCO Continental Exec Sec, and all
literature to be
released about them and the curriculum to be taught must be passed
upon, in
writing, by HCO Cont Exec Sec.
LRH:jl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1961
CenOCon
Franchise
TRAINING POLICY
On and after January 1st, 1962, only students who have
successfully
completed an Academy course on or after July 1st, 1961 shall be
examined
and certificated by the HCO Board of Review.
In order to emphasize the value of improved training in
Academies and
to encourage students to qualify for certificates without delay, the
following
policies are instituted.
Any students who have completed their Academy training before
July 1st,
1961 should be notified of this. The HCO Board of Review should also
inform them
of the latest date on which they can be examined. If they do not
attend and pass
their examination and complete their certificate requirements by 31st
December,
1961, they will be required to take further training in the Academy at
their own
expense before being allowed to be examined or certificated by the HCO
Board of
Review.
Also, students who complete (Or have completed) the Academy
course on or
after July 1st, 1961, shall be required to pass the HCO Board of
Review exam,
and to complete their certificate requirements, within 12 months. If
after 12
months they have not done so, they will not be allowed to be examined
or
certificated by the HCO Board of Review until they have taken further
training
in the Academy, at their own expense.
LRH:jl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
299
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 OCTOBER 1961
CenOrgs
D of T
Training STANDARDIZED E-METER BOOK EXAM
The attached exam is a standardized verbal test on E-Meter
Essentials
to be given to all course students using this book. Answers to this
exam must be 100% correct to pass.
Any additional questions could (and should) be added from the
book by
the examiner. The student is only examined until he misses a question.
The
student has failed and the exam is over and the whole examination must
be
taken again.
Examiners should not ask these questions consecutively, but
should
select questions at random.
Philip D. Quirino
HCO Technical
Secretary WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
E-Meter Book Exam
1. Define a Hubbard Electrometer.
2. Can a person be cleared without the use of an E-Meter?
3. Will the use of non-standard Meters produce a clear?
4. Is the E-Meter a precision instrument?
5. Does the E-Meter know what is what before the preclear does?
6. What causes the various needle reactions?
7. Which Tone Arm reading indicates greater density of masses, 1.5
or 5.5?
8. A low toned male preclear who can not influence his mind or body
at all
reads at what position of the Tone Arm?
9. Where would a dead body female read on the Tone Arm?
10. Where does a female Clear read on the Tone Arm and what needle
manifestation would she have?
11. A low toned person has what kind of needle response?
12. What reading will a dead body male pass through before becoming
a high
Tone Arm case?
13. What are the two most important things that the Tone Arm tells
the Auditor?
14. How can you tell a case is not moving?
15. Can you change a process if the Tone Arm is moving?
16. At what Tone Arm motion would you leave a level of the Pre Hay
Scale?
17. Is the following good Tone Arm action: 3.5 to 3.3 to 3.6 to 3.4
in twenty
minutes of auditing?
18. What two things do you know when the Tone Arm is not moving
under
processing?
19. What are the mechanics of what happens when the Tone Arm is not
moving
under a process?
20. What do you do if you have run a terminal on a level too long
and have
stuck the Tone Arm?
21. How is the Sensitivity knob set for any preclear?
22. While doing a goals assessment, would you change the Sensitivity
knob?
23. Can you change the Sensitivity knob during rudiments?
300
24. Can you change the Sensitivity knob during a process?
25. What three things monitor the needle action?
26. What are the ten main needle actions and describe the direction
of
action as seen by an Auditor looking at the meter or the
movement of each,
27. What does a fall tell the auditor?
28. How can you check to see if the E-Meter is working?
29. Can a case be assessed on a change of needle characteristic?
30. What does a rising needle mean?
31. What is the only use of a rising needle at present?
32. Is the needle returning to position after a fall considered to
be a rising
needle?
33. What does a Theta-Bop mean?
34. Which takes precedence in an assessment, a fall, a Theta-Bop or
a Rock
Slam?
35. If a Rock Slam turns on while running a process, but the Tone
Arm is not
moving, would you continue or change the process?
36. What does a free needle indicate as regards state of case?
37. How can you tell whether a preclear is really eating during
processing?
38. What kind of processes need to be run on Stage Four cases?
39. Havingness is read where on the E-Meter?
40. How can the Auditor tell whether the havingness process is
working or not?
41. Confront processes are run where on the E-Meter?
42. How does an Auditor know when a Confront process is working?
43. What is the only reason you use a Havingness process?
44. What is the only reason you use a Confront process?
45. When and why are Havingness and Confront processes done in SOP
Goals?
46. On a Security Check, if the needle still falls on a question
what two
things can you conclude?
47. What must you do about the two things above?
48. Do you turn up the sensitivity knob on each question of the
Security
check to make sure you have all on any particular question?
49. What do you do if on a Security check, on a particular question
when
you get a fall, then a no fall for two repeats, then a fall?
50. Will a preclear who has withholds progress?
51. On a Security check do you follow up a change of needle
characteristic?
52. What does a rise on a can squeeze tell us about a case?
53. Would a person who Rock-Slammed or Theta-Bopped on all questions
of a
Security check pass the check?
54. What is the only significance with regard to a different Tone
Arm reading
if both cans are held in either the left hand or the right hand?
55. What is the most important thing about a lie reaction test?
56. Will a regular E-Meter be of use in auditing a person from Clear
up to 0T?
57. What is the main use of the needle in Auditing?
58. What is the main use of the Tone Arm in Auditing?
----------
LRH:jl.vmm.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
301
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 OCTOBER 1961
CenOCon
ACADEMY TRAINING
(Revises existing Schedules)
Due to new discoveries on what can be done with a Security
Check, and
the difficulties entered by hidden standards in getting a case
trained, it is
important that the HCA/HPA Student become familiar and able with
meters and
security checks and hidden standards early in his training.
Therefore, without otherwise altering the intensity of current
training
or curricula of Units I or 2, the following becomes policy effective
at once
on receipt of this Policy Letter:
ALL STUDENTS, FROM THEIR EARLIEST ENTRANCE INTO THE ACADEMY,
SHALL HAVE
TRAINING ON SECURITY CHECKING AND A PART OF EACH TRAINING DAY (OR WEEK
IN THE
CASE OF WEEKEND OR EVENING STUDENTS) SHALL BE DEVOTED TO GIVING OR
RECEIVING
PROCESSING (SECURITY) CHECKS.
This is in keeping with the oldest of Academy policies: To turn
Out
auditors capable of being employed in the HGC without further
training. It has
not been possible to follow this policy for a very long time. But now
with the
advent of auditor classification, if security checking is well learned
by end
of training, the new graduate will be instantly employable. This means
greater
field results.
----------
The teaching of Security Checking from the outset introduces
other items
which must therefore become policy.
A STUDENT ENTERING AN ACADEMY MUST PROVIDE HIMSELF OR HERSELF
WITH AN
E-METER OF APPROVED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE.
This may be arranged as the organization finds most practical
and as may
be feasible for the student.
The Academy may not loan, use or own Meters. The organization
may not
furnish B-Meters for use or instruction to an Academy.
It should be broadly published that meters not approved by HCO
cannot be
used in an Academy for training. A whole programme of training could
break down
through the use of meters that work with too sensitive or too
insensitive or
freak reactions. Meters that are not standard cannot be described or
taught.
STUDENTS FOUND TO BE USING THE WITHHOLDS OF OTHER STUDENTS FOR
JOKES,
HORSE PLAY OR MAKING ANOTHER STUDENT GUILTY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO SEVERE
DISCIPLINARY ACTION.
----------
The types of processing (security) checks for student practice
at the
outset should be very specific and easily cleared and should contain
no general
questions.
Example of general question:
Have you ever been angry about anything?
302
Examples of specific question:
Have you ever withheld anything from your mother?
Have you ever lied to Joe? (an Instructor)
The difference between a general question and a specific
question is a
matter of general or specific terminal. If the question has a general
terminal
such as "anyone", "men", "people", it is harder to clear than a
question with
a specific terminal such as "your father", "Miss Smith", etc, etc.
It is dangerous to a case (since the person may blow) to leave a
question
with charge on it. General questions are much more likely to be
charged or to
produce blows.
----------
It is intended by this Policy Letter that about an hour of each
instruction day be devoted to giving or receiving a Processing Check
whether
the student can do it or not.
Familiarity alone will gradually promote confidence. Training
coupled to
this will make a good auditor, However, no training at all need
accompany this
exercise in the first couple of weeks. Just give the student a mimeoed
special
Processing Check form, have him hold an E-Meter and check another
student for an
hour. They'll bumble through and finally be ready to know they don't
know about
it. This can go in on the student's first day. And it can continue,
right on
through to the last day on course, whether the student is using simple
checks or
standard forms depending on his progress.
----------
Warning: The main danger in doing this is turning an HPA/HCA
into a
specialized security checker, not an auditor. So steps must be taken
to make
sure the skills of the auditor are not lost and that the student does
not get
a highly over developed idea of himself as an Inquisitor.
Thus processing periods as such, using old processes such as ARC
Straight
Wire, must also be employed as the student goes on.
----------
We expect a student to emerge from an HPA/HCA Course able to
pass with a
70% or better grade, a general examination on Scientology Auditing and
a perfect
examination on the Model Session, Rudiments, the B-Meter and Security
Checking.
His TRs and auditing deportment must be good. And he must be able to
handle a
routine auditing process.
----------
Training time has been demonstrated to be lengthened when actual
processing is deleted from an Academy Schedule. The introduction of
Security
Checking over the whole training period and continuing actual auditing
on old
basic processes during Unit Two will give us a training speed up and
good field
results.
Note: Hidden Standards are taught only on Unit Two and are found
and
relieved on beginning students only by Advanced (Unit Two) Students.
Unit One
Students may only do simple checking.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:md.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
303
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 OCTOBER 1961
Academies
NEW RUNDOWN FOR BSCN/HCS COURSE
The present situation of the BScn/HCS course is as follows:
1. SOP Goals is being taught by instructors who have not graduated
from the
Saint Hill Briefing Course.
2. No one has ever been reported to have found their goal, terminal
and
pre-hav level.
3. Too much time is being spent on the basics of auditing which
should have
been learned on an HPA/HCA course.
Therefore, the BScn/HCS course will be revised as follows and is
to be
put into effect immediately.
----------
SOP Goals is to be taught in the BScn/HCS course, but only by a
Class
Four auditor who has graduated from the Saint Hill Briefing Course
with honours.
This instructor must at all times keep in direct communication with
HCO WW and
will only be under Ron's direction.
The goals of this course are:
1. To make Class Three auditors.
2. To emphasize SOP Goals training.
3. To pull in old BScn/HCS auditors for an "SOP Goals"
Validation Seal.
There is a prerequisite to this course, which is that the
applicant must
be up to the HPA/HCA standards on E-Meter, Sec Checks, Model Session
and TRs.
If the applicant is not up to these standards he must take an HPA/HCA
Retread
course to raise him up to current standards at which time he may
reapply for
the BScn/HCS course.
No student may qualify for the BScn/HCS Certificate with "SOP
Goals"
Validation Seal until he has:
1. Had sections "0" and "P" of Problems Intensive (HCO
Bulletin of
October 17, 1961, Problems Intensive) flattened, i.e. no hidden
standards.
2. Had his own goal, terminal and pre-hav level found.
3. Successfully found a preclear's goal, terminal and pre-hav
level.
4. Been checked Out on all data on SOP Goals.
Issued by: Philip Quirino
HCO Technical
Secretary WW
for
LRH:iet.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
304
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 NOVEMBER 1961
BPI
ALLOWED PROCESSES FROM COURSES
As it is taking three months or more at Saint Hill to make a
qualified
Class III auditor, and as all field courses are only six weeks, my
experience
and data on progress of these courses demands, in fairness to the
public, that:
No Course not taught at Saint Hill may qualify a field auditor
for Class
III processes, and no field auditor or HGC auditor not qualified as
Class III
may use Routine 3,
See Safety Table HCO Bulletin of October 26, 1961.
It is too dangerous running the wrong goal and terminal to
permit auditors
not qualified to find and run them on pcs.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:imj.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
305
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 NOVEMBER 1961
HCO Secs
Assn Secs
Ds of T
BPI
TRAINING COURSE REQUIREMENTS
As from this date, certificates will only be issued when the
full
requirements for any Scientology training Course have been met.
These requirements will now include the Extension Course which
must be
completed within one year of enrolment, and which must now appear as
an item
on the Check-sheets for ALL current and subsequent Courses.
Application Forms for all levels of Professional Training
Courses should,
from now on, include a clause to the effect that the Course shall not
be deemed
to have been completed, and the Certificate will not be awarded until
ALL the
course-requirements have been met.
Also, all HPA/HCA Courses, including current ones, shall include
the
Anatomy of the Human Mind Course as a Check-sheet requirement.
This policy is instituted so that no-one will receive a
professional
qualification without having an adequate knowledge of the most basic
material
of the subject.
Issued by: HCO Technical
Secretary WW
LRH:jw.cden.rd for
Copyright ($) 1961 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 NOVEMBER 1961
HCO Secs
Org Secs
Ds of T
SAINT HILL TAPES FOR HPA/HCA COURSES
Any Saint Hill Special Briefing Course tapes on E-Metering,
CCHs, Sec
Checking or Problems Intensives may be played to HPA/HCA Courses,
providing
the usual basic tapes are also played.
Saint Hill tapes on Clearing may NOT be played to HPA/HCA
Courses.
Issued by: HCO Technical
Secretary WW
LRH:esc.rd for
Copyright ($) 1961 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
306
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 DECEMBER 1961
CenOCon
STUDENT E-METERING
All Academy students must be trained on B-Meters from the start
even
if they only hold one in their lap whenever they are 'auditor' or
'student'
(not coach) in a Comm Course TR
A student must have studied and passed E-Meter Essentials with a
70%
grade and have received instruction on B-Meters before being permitted
to Sec
Check any other student.
A student may only use innocuous Sec Check Forms such as some of
those
that have been released in HCO Info Letters and may not use HCO Pol
Ltr type
Sec Checks while being trained to Sec Check.
All auditing on any process must be done with a Meter in the
'Auditor's'
hands whether Sec Checking is being done or not. Only exception: the
CCHs and
Upper Indoc TRs. Where there's an Academy 'Auditing session' in
progress the
auditor (never the coach) is holding an E-Meter. Where there's an
Academy
session there's an E-Meter.
A second examination on E-Meter Essentials must be passed 100%
and the
student must pass E-Meter demonstration training 100% and must feel
easy and
familiar with the E-Meter before he or she can run a HCO Policy Letter
Sec
Check Form such as Form 3 (the Joburg) and Form 6, etc. on any fellow
student.
SUMMARY
This divides student E-Meter training into four stages:
1. Holding a Meter and nothing else. Prerequisite: Being an
Academy
enrollee.
2. Observing their Meter while auditing basic Class I
processes.
Prerequisite: Having held a Meter through Comm Course.
3. Using the Meter on HCO Info Ltr type Sec Checks.
Prerequisite:
1 & 2 above, passing E-Meter Essentials witha grade of 70%,
having had B-Meter demonstrated and explained in class.
4. Class II type Sec Checking using HCO Pol Ltr forms.
Prerequisite:
1, 2 and 3 above, and having passed B-Meter Essentials with
a grade
of 100%, having received demonstrations, tapes and coaching
on the E-
Meter and passed an examination on them. (This step is
equivalent to
Class II auditor requirements but does not award Class II by
having
been reached in the Academy.)
REASON
Academy Ds of T and Instructors will be getting blows, entheta
and upset
cases by reason of missed withholds unless the above is vigorously
applied and
required without exception.
----------
(It is expected that an Academy Graduate at HPA level will be
able to
easily pass a Classification Examination as well as his HPA exam when
going to
work for a Central Org. The Classification exam is not to be given as
a matter
due because of course completion. It cannot be so awarded. A Class II
examination can only be given if the student goes to work, on
graduation, at the
Central Organization or City Office.)
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:esc.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
307.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 JANUARY 1962
CenOCon
UPGRADING OF AUDITORS
Now that a definite standard has been established in training
and
classifying auditors from HPA upward, everything should be done by
Academies
and HCO Boards of Review to make the diplomas, certificates and
classifications
really valuable and meaningful.
Current requirements for any certificate, classification or
validation
must be rigidly enforced, without exception.
A gradient scale of proficiency should be aimed at, for a new
HPA off the
Academy, via the HGC or field, enabling him to participate by
graduating to
higher levels. A candidate for a higher level course should not be
accepted
unless he has completed all the necessary requirements of his current
lower
level, and unless he has taken responsibility for his own case level
and
subjective reality by obtaining adequate auditing.
Instructors should not be allowed to instruct in Academies or on
PEs
unless they are fully qualified and certificated. Practice in running
PE
Courses, PE Comm Courses, HAS Co-audits and Group Auditing should be
part of
the requirements for a basic HPA certificate.
Current requirements for a validation seal should be enforced,
and old
graduates encouraged to take training retreads to qualify for new
validation
and classification.
When sufficient numbers have been through the Saint Hill
Briefing Course,
a list of Clearing Scientologists can be made up, which may be made
available
to the public.
If these basic rules are followed, a standard of professional
auditing
can be established which will be respected everywhere.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
HCO Secretary
WW
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:sf.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
308
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 MAY 1962
CenOCon
Franchise
PRACTICAL AUDITING SKILLS
How to Use this Policy Letter
Issue the following form to all auditors, students, etc for
their
own insight, and issue it routinely.
Practical Auditing Skills
A Self Appreciation
These are the total doingness skills of "the Perfect Auditor".
Any auditor would do well to check himself or herself out on his
or her
doingness of an auditing session as an auditor. Theory is easier to
confront
than doingness. Therefore, mark yourself honestly on these points and
then
practise doing what you need until you are satisfied. Then do another
sheet and
practise those. BE HONEST WITH YOURSELF. Auditing is a precise
doingness of the
following items:
TRs CALM FAIR UNSURE
TR O: ______ ______ ______
TR 1: ______ ______ ______
TR 2: ______ ______ ______
TR 3: ______ ______ ______
TR 4: ______ ______ ______
CCHs
CCH 1: ______ ______ ______
CCH 2: ______ ______ ______
CCH 3: ______ ______ ______
CCH4: ______ ______ ______
SCS: ______ ______ ______
Op Pro by Dup: ______ ______ ______
Two Way Comm in CCHs: ______ ______ ______
E-METER
Trimming: ______ ______ ______
On-Off Switch: ______ ______ ______
Sensitivity Knob: ______ ______ ______
Tone Arm Handling: ______ ______ ______
Needle Pattern Reading: ______ ______ ______
Nul Needle: ______ ______ ______
Theta Bops: ______ ______ ______
Rock Slams: ______ ______ ______
Falls: ______ ______ ______
Rises: ______ ______ ______
Speeded Rise: ______ ______ ______
Speeded Fall: ______ ______ ______
Slowed Rise: ______ ______ ______
Slowed Fall: ______ ______ ______
Ticks: ______ ______ ______
309
Free Needle: ______ ______ ______
Stuck Needle: ______ ______ ______
Body Motion: ______ ______ ______
Tiny Reads: ______ ______ ______
Testing for a Clean Needle: ______ ______ ______
MODEL SESSION
Beginning Ruds: ______ ______ ______
Body of Session: ______ ______ ______
End Ruds: ______ ______ ______
Two Way Comm: ______ ______ ______
HANDLING PC
Detecting Missed W/Hs: ______ ______ ______
ARC Breaky Pes: ______ ______ ______
Getting Off Missed W/Hs: ______ ______ ______
Getting off Invalidations: ______ ______ ______
Q & A-ing with Pc: ______ ______ ______
PRACTICAL PROCESSES
PTP Process: ______ ______ ______
ARC Break Action: ______ ______ ______
Finding Overts: ______ ______ ______
Forming What Questions: ______ ______ ______
When All Appear Who System: ______ ______ ______
Finding Bottom of Chain: ______ ______ ______
Finding Hav Process: ______ ______ ______
Pre-J-Iav Assessment: ______ ______ ______
Listing: ______ ______ ______
Testing Completeness: ______ ______ ______
Nulling: ______ ______ ______
Checking: ______ ______ ______
Getting Missed W/Hs Off: ______ ______ ______
Getting Item Invalidations Off: ______ ______ ______
Getting Suppressions Off: ______ ______ ______
Cleaning a Needle Reaction: ______ ______ ______
Cleaning a Dirty Needle: ______ ______ ______
Getting More Goals or Items: ______ ______ ______
Getting Pc into Session: ______ ______ ______
Getting Pc Out of Session: ______ ______ ______
Controlling Pc's attention: ______ ______ ______
Creating R factor: ______ ______ ______
Holding up against Pc's Suggestions: ______ ______ ______
Holding Constant against Adversity: ______ ______ ______
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ph.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
310
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 MAY 1962
Sthll Students
Academies
TRAINING SECTIONS
Effective on the first Monday
after Receipt in Academies
and on 14 May 1962 at Saint Hill
Training Courses are hereby divided into three, and only three,
Sections.
These are:
The Theory Section
The Practical Section
The Auditing Section
The sections run concurrently with each other, not
consecutively. Tables
will be issued giving the requirements by sections and their check
sheets from
time to time.
THE THEORY SECTION
In this division is taken up all applicable theory in Training.
The student is given a check sheet on which all theory items are
named.
The student studies HCO Bulletins, Tapes and Texts as given in
his check
sheet. These are studied independently by the student, not in a group
of
students.
When the individual student believes he can pass an examination
on the
item studied, he goes to the examiner, who gives him an oral
examination. The
examination sheet has twenty or more questions for tapes. There is no
examination sheet for HCO Bulletins. The examiner asks five random
questions of
the student from the sheet or text. The student must answer all five
perfectly
without hints or coaching from the examiner. If a re-examination
occurs,
different questions are asked. If the student passes, the examiner
initials the
student's check sheet and the student goes back to a study room to
study
additional HCO Bulletins, texts and tapes.
The examiner is in charge of the Theory Section and hands out
the items of
study for the course and keeps all records and materials for the
course as well
as his or her section and all files for the students. The examiner is
available
during normal hours for examinations. Examinations may not be
scheduled for
certain days of the week only, and no appreciable time should elapse
between
completion of study of an item and examination on it.
The book "B-Meter Essentials," the Axioms and possibly other
special texts
are not included in the five question rule, for many more questions
than five
should be asked on such vital items.
There is a final course examination, written, which may review
any item
passed already in the Theory Section.
The Examiner must remember that to be easy on future auditors is
to invite
disaster to some future preclear. The only overt one can really do in
Scientology is poor or inaccurate dissemination.
THE PRACTICAL SECTION
As it has recently been found that theory is more easily
confronted than
doingness, the Practical Section is created to care for this fact and
to make
the student confront and do accurate doingness. This section may not
then become
a second theory section where one studies texts. In the Practical
Section the
student only does.
311
Drills and practical auditing presence are the whole concentration of
this
section. Any study for it is instantly translated into doingness.
The drills of the Practical Section are basically outlined in
HCO Policy
Letter of May 3, 1962, to be supplemented.
The student may have a Comm Course in the Practical Section but
one should
not hang a student long on TRs I to 4. For there are many more
practical steps
to be done.
Demonstrations may be done before groups of students but only if
the
demonstration is translated under supervised student doingness.
The person in charge of the Practical Section is called the
Practical
Supervisor. This person supervises all drills being done by teams of
students
and gives examinations in another capacity as a Practical Examiner.
The beginning student is furnished with a Practical Check Sheet.
As each
drill is examined for accuracy of performance, the Practical Examiner
checks the
drill as passed on the student's check sheet.
Until an indicated number of these drills are passed, the
student may not
audit.
A final examination may be given at Course end on the student's
practical.
The whole concentration of the Practical Section is based on the
fact that
for any auditing situation there is an exact auditor response. The by-
word of
the Practical Section is "When faced with the unusual, do the usual."
Random,
wild auditor responses and extraordinary solutions are ground out of
the student
in the Practical Section. The whole goal is to achieve a dependable
auditor who
will give standard responses. This alone will make his auditing
effective as our
records show.
THE AUDITING SECTION
The student, when he has passed minimal theory and practical for
an
auditing class, is then also assigned to the Auditing Section. While
working
in the Auditing Section, the student completes the requirements of the
level
he or she is auditing in.
The Auditing Section is headed by the Auditing Supervisor
(usually the
D of T).
The Auditing Supervisor does most of his or her inspection by
studying
Auditing Reports written by the auditor. In the event of no gain or
worse, the
Auditing Supervisor investigates the auditor's auditing in terms of
GROSS
AUDITING ERRORS and finds and corrects these by close inspection of
the next
session.
The Auditing Section is there to instil the fact that standard
auditing
gets results, that only results are acceptable and that extra-ordinary
solutions
get bad results.
The Auditing Supervisor is not there to crack cases. The
Auditing
Supervisor is there only to get good auditing done. His or her
attention is on
the auditor not the pc, an important fact which, if overlooked, will
stagnate
auditing results.
The D of T may resolve personal problems amongst students by
ordering
them to the HGC. The Auditing Section is there to get good, standard
auditing
done. It is not the HGC where attention is all on the preclear.
SUMMARY
It is intended that the emphasis of all course training shall be
a
flawless ability to do auditing, and a command of the theory and goals
of
Scientology. A student on leaving course should be able to do
Scientology and
achieve excellent auditing results.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
312
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 MAY 1962
Issue 2
Sthil Students
Academies
TRAINING
Classes of Auditors
The following outline of materials is to be used for compiling
check
sheets and gives the fundamental skills and understandings by class
for Academy
and Saint Hill Courses.
An Academy teaches up to Class Ila which is the equivalent of
HPA/HCA
and results in the award of that certificate. The highest level of
skill of
an HPA/HCA is expected to be repetitive processes, assists, and the
CCHs
combined with Prepchecking.
Anyone retreading at an Academy should be considered to need all
check
sheets up to HCA/HPA.
While this material will be set out in full in future lectures
and HCO
Bulletins, Academies should begin by using what they have to hand.
Class IIIa & IIIb material is to be taught at Saint Hill in
addition
to the lower classes.
This outline is released so that instructors can proceed with
what
materials they have, converting to this outline at once and using new
materials
being released to keep their check sheets up to date.
It will be noted that all sections of a class are concurrent
with each
other and are not taught consecutively. The auditing section lags only
a bit
behind the other two.
Class Ia:
Theory Section: Auditor's Code, E-Meter Essentials, Basic
Scales,
Dynamics.
Practical Section: Complete CCH Section of HCO Policy Letter of
May 3, 1962.
TR 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Model session. The complete E-Meter check
Items on
HCO Policy Letter of May 3, 1962.
Auditing Section:
Op Pro by Dup and SCS. Assists.
Class Ib:
Theory Section: Communication Formula.
E-Meter Tapes, tapes on the theory and attitudes of an auditor,
Code
of a Scientologist. Basic materials on ARC and ARC straight
wire.
Havingness.
Practical Section:
Model session section of HCO Policy Letter of May 3, 1962.
Auditing Section: ARC straight wire done in Model session.
Havingness.
313
Class IIa:
Theory Section:
HCO Bulletins and Tapes on Prepchecking. Tapes on CCHs. Axioms.
Practical Section:
Handling PC part of HCO Policy Letter of May 3, 1962. Pertinent
items
of the Practical Processes Section of HCO Policy Letter of May
3, 1962.
Auditing Section:
Prepchecking by HCO Policy Letter forms and HCO Bulletin of May
10, 1962
and CCHs. (The Prepchecking is done in conjunction with CCHs,
some of one,
some of the other alternately.)
----------
The above completes the modern level of HPA/HCA; or if completed
at Saint
Hill gives Class 2. An old HCA/HPA is prerequisite for entering Saint
Hill
training.
The following is carried on only at Saint Hill in addition to
the earlier
classes.
Class IIIa:
Theory Section:
Various tapes and bulletins on Assessments. Problems Intensive.
Advanced
HCO Bulletins and tapes on Rudiments.
Practical Section:
Practical Processes section of FICO Policy Letter of May 3, 1962
in
full and any weakness remedied in any phase of practical.
Auditing Section:
Havingness. Getting Rudiments in. Dynamic Assessment, Pre-Hav
Assessment. Problems Intensive.
Class IIIb:
Theory Section: Routine 3 processes, various HCO Bulletins and
tapes
on auditing and auditing attitudes.
Practical: Review of any weakness in Practical.
Auditing: Current Routine 3 process.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:cw.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
314
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 MAY 1962
Sthil Students
Academies
TRAINING
CLASSES OF AUDITORS
(Revised from HCO Policy Letter of 14 May 1962)
The following outline of materials is to be used for compiling
check
sheets and gives the fundamental skills and understandings by class
for
Academy HPA/HCA, Class II, and Saint Hill Courses.
An Academy HPA/HCA teaches up to Class ha which is the
equivalent of
HPA/HCA and results in the award of that certificate. The highest
level of
skill of an HPA/HCA is expected to be repetitive processes, assists,
and the
CCHs combined with Prepchecking.
Anyone retreading at an Academy should be considered to need all
check
sheets for Class II skills. This is the Academy Class II Course,
While this material will be set out in full in future lectures
and HCO
Bulletins, Academies should begin by using what they have to hand.
Class IIIa and IIIb material is to be taught at Saint Hill in
addition
to Class II skills,
This outline is released so that instructors can proceed with
what
materials they have, converting to this outline at once and using new
materials
being released to keep their check sheets up to date.
It will be noted that all sections of' a class are concurrent
with each
other and are not taught consecutively. The auditing section lags only
a bit
behind the other two.
Class la: It is expected that the student know the basics of
Scientology
and be able to do duplicative processes.
Theory Section: Auditor's Code, E-Meter Essentials, Basic
Scales,
Dynamics.
Practical Section: Complete CCH Section of HCO Policy
Letter of
May 3, 1962. TR 0, 1, 2, 3,4. Model session. The complete
E-Meter
check Items on HCO Policy Letter of May 3, 1962.
Auditing Section: Op Pro by Dup and SCS. Assists.
Class lb. It is expected that the student be able to do a good
session
with an E-Meter and repetitive formal processes.
Theory Section: Communication Formula. E-Meter Tapes,
tapes on the
theory and attitudes of an auditor, Code of a
Scientologist. Basic
materials on ARC and ARC straight wire. Havingness.
Practical Section: Model session Section of HCO Policy
Letter of
May 3, 1962.
Auditing Section: ARC straight wire done in Model session.
Havingness. Repetitive formal processes.
315
Class IIa: It is expected that a student be able to get good results
with
Prepchecking and CCHs.
Theory Section.' HCO Bulletins and Tapes on Prepchecking. Tapes
on
CCHs. Axioms.
Practical Section: Handling pc part of HCO Policy Letter of May
3, 1962.
Pertinent items of the Practical Processes Section of HCO Policy
Letter of
May 3, 1962.
Auditing Section: Prepchecking by HCO Policy Letter forms and
HCO Bulletin
of May 19, 1962 and CCHs. (The Prepchecking is done in
conjunction with
CCHs, some of one, some of the other alternately.)
Class IIb: It is expected that the student have a complete command of
the
fundamentals of sessions and B-Meters at an advanced level.
Theory Section: Auditor's Code, E-Meter Essentials, Havingness,
E-Meter
Tapes.
Practical Section:
TRs: TRO,TR1,TR2,TR3,TR4.
E-Meter: Trimming, On-Off Switch, Sensitivity Knob, Tone
Arm
Handling, Needle Pattern Reading, Nul Needle, Theta Bops,
Rock
Slams, Falls, Rises, Speeded Rise, Speeded Fall, Slowed
Rise, Slowed
Fall, Ticks, Free Needle, Stuck Needle. Body Motion, Tiny
Reads,
Testing for a Clean Needle, Finding Hay Process.
Model Session: Script; Beginning Rudiments; End Rudiments;
Rudiment
Doingness: Room, Auditor, W/H, PTP, Untruth, etc,
Influence,
Commands, Session W/Hs, Auditor, Room.
And other drills as required.
Auditing Section: None.
Class IIc: It is expected that the student have a theoretical and
practical
level command of processes for this lifetime and be able to audit a
skilled
Model Session with havingness and be able to keep all rudiments in.
Theory Section: Basic HCO Bulletins and Tapes on Prepchecking
and the
CCHs, Axioms, Basic Rudiment Processes, Tapes and Bulletins.
Practical Section:
CCHs: CCH 1, CCH 2, CCH 3, CCH 4
Two-Way Comm: Drill.
Handling Pc: Detecting Missed W/Hs, ARC Breaking pcs,
Getting Off
Missed W/Hs, Getting Off Invalidations, Q and A-ing with
pc.
Practical Processes. ARC break action by goals, Finding
Overts,
Forming What Questions: When, All, Appear Who System,
Finding
Bottom of Chain, Cleaning a Needle Reaction, Cleaning a
Dirty
Needle.
Auditing Section. Beginning Ruds, Locating Havingness process
and running
it, and End Rudiments (1 hour sessions only) Short Sessioning.
Class IId: It is expected that the student acquire a high level skill
in
handling the CCHs and Prepchecking and administer these perfectly in
an auditing
session.
316
Theory Section: Completion of CCII and Prepchecking Bulletins
and Tapes.
Practical Section: Getting pc into Session, Getting pc Out of
Session,
Controlling pc's attention, Holding up against pc's suggestions,
Creating
R Factor, Holding Constant Against Adversity. And other drills
as
required.
Auditing Section: Prepchecking and CCHs. Form 3 and Form 6A
completed.
Class IIIa: It is expected of a student to have a theoretical and
practical
command of the basics of assessment.
Theory Section: Basic bulletins and tapes on Assessments.
Problems
Intensive, Advanced HCO Bulletins and Tapes on Rudiments.
Practical Section: Pre-Hav Assessment, Listing, Testing
Completeness,
Nulling, Checking, Getting Missed W/Hs Off, Getting Item
Invalidations
Off, Room End Rud, Getting Suppressions Off, Cleaning Needle
Reaction,
Cleaning Dirty Needle, Getting more goals or items. And other
drills as
required.
Auditing Section: None.
Class IIIb: It is expected of a student to have a high level
command
of the theory and practical aspects of Class III skills and be
able to
audit by assessment.
Theory Section: Further Bulletins and Tapes on Assessments,
Basic Routine
3 process bulletins and tapes.
Practical Section: Getting pe into Session, Getting pc out of
Session,
Controlling PC'S attention, Creating R Factor, Holding up
against pc's
suggestion, Holding Constant against adversity. And other drills
as
required.
Auditing Section: Dynamic assessment, Pre-Hav Assessment,
Problems
Intensive.
Class IIIc: It is expected of a student to have a high level command
of Routine
3 processes and to audit them with skill.
Theory Section: Routine 3 processes as given in Tapes and
Bulletins.
Auditing and auditing attitudes.
Practical Section: Review of any weakness in Practical and other
drills
as required.
Auditing Section: Current Routine 3 process.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
317
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MAY 1962
Sthil
CenOCon
All Academy Hats
TRAINING
SESSION CANCELLATION
AUDITING SECTION
Today auditing results depend on the exact performance, by the
auditor,
of the simple steps of auditing.
The exact and expert use of a proper E-Meter, the exact use of
the steps
of the session, the exact use of procedure and techniques alone give
the
expected results.
Extraordinary solutions, departure from the precise material
lead to
auditing failures. And only improper usage of modern technology can
give
auditing failures.
In training the student auditor must get a good reality on these
facts.
Scientology properly used gives wins, improperly used gives loses.
Instructors too must realize that where a pc is not winning the
fault does
not lie in the peculiar or unusual nature of the case but with gross
auditing
errors by the auditor.
Session Cancellation, rather than other discipline, is a
workable and
better policy than scoldings or infraction sheets, as by session
cancellation as
a system in training the pc is saved further abuse and the auditor
goes back to
discover that he or she was making a gross error, a thing students
often contest
or disbelieve.
Students usually believe the PC 15 "different" or that there are
variables
in procedure rather than that their own application is wrong; this is
a
motivator aspect-the student auditor believes he or she has been
wronged by
"unworkable processes" or "bad pcs" rather than realizing that he or
she has
committed gross auditing errors.
If a student's errors are not corrected, the student continues
to lose on
pcs, pcs lose and the student eventually ceases to audit.
The student must be taught to meet the unusual with the usual
and if this
is done, everybody will win.
With this end in view, Session Cancellation as a system is
introduced as
the only training rebuttal by an instructor in the Auditing Section
for a gross
auditing error.
The system, briefly, is this. When a student auditor commits a
gross
auditing error in the auditing section, the student's sessions as an
auditor are
cancelled, the student is put back through the Theory and Practical
Sections on
those points involved in the gross auditing error and is then
permitted to audit
again. All former passes in Theory or Practical on the subject of the
gross
auditing error are cancelled and the items must be passed again as
though they
had never been taken before.
We have hitherto considered that an auditing session, scheduled,
was
inexorable, and we sought to patch up errors while permitting auditing
to
continue. This is too hard on pcs and gives entirely a wrong idea of
what is
expected.
All auditing sessions given in the Auditing Section are for
gain, not for
practice. The auditor is to audit to produce a case improvement in the
pc, not
to practice auditing.
When a student is assigned to the auditing section, he is
expected to be
conversant with the skills to be employed in the session. He attains
this by
high quality passes in the Theory and Practical Sections. He employs
this
learned skill in the Auditing Section to the benefit of the preclear.
While in the auditing section, if the student commits a gross
auditing
error violating what he learned in Theory and Practical for the type
of session
the student is giving, the penalty is Session Cancellation.
318
This is posted only after the session given has been completed.
The
auditing supervisor does not break up the session in progress,
although he
may direct that certain steps are taken. That certain steps were
ordered taken
and the taking of those steps by the student auditor does not
influence
Cancellation of future sessions either way. That the Auditing
Supervisor gave
the student directions on what to do with the pc does not mean that
the student
is thereafter cancelled.
----------
The exact procedure is as follows:
An auditor's report is turned in by every auditor in the
auditing section
at the end of the auditing day. These reports are written during the
session by
the auditor.
Every preclear in the auditing section has a Preclear's Folder,
of
distinctive colour, in which all lists, comments and auditor's reports
are
always kept.
The Auditing Supervisor goes over these folders before the next
session
and comments on the report, or gives directions. The Auditing
Supervisor's data
may be taken from actual observation of the session or from the report
or from
an interview with the pc. The written comment may be amplified by
personal
interview with the student auditor. The common means to obtain
information for
auditing directions is by studying the report and looking at the
preclear after
the session.
If the Auditing Supervisor or Instructor sees that a gross
auditing error
(as per list below) is occurring before the next scheduled session the
Auditing
Supervisor posts on the Student Board the "Cancellation List". This
list gives
the date of the list, the name of the auditor and the items in theory
and
practical that must be done before sessions are resumed.
Theory and Practical Supervisors take their data from this sheet
after it
is posted and re-correct their students' class check sheets from it.
When the student has redone the Theory and Practical work
required, the
Practical Supervisor posts the student on a "Session Restored List"
which
advises both the Auditing Supervisor and the student that the student
can
continue in the auditing section in addition to other work.
As a student has to do a minimum number of hours of auditing in
a class
it is in his or her interest to re-do the Theory and Practical work as
quickly
as possible. A session resulting in a cancellation is not counted into
these
minimum hours.
That the required Theory and Practical work has been done is
easily
ascertained as more than one passing initial will be found on the
student's
check sheet by the Practical Supervisor and he also can see the
Cancellation
Lists of previous days.
The auditing supervisor also makes up his auditing assignments
before
Monday morning and should review check sheets and his previous
cancellation
lists in order to do this to keep from missing a student who has done
the
required work.
A student may be restored to auditing at any time, providing
only that
he or she has had the required work done.
-----------
Cancellation of Session may occur only in the presence of a
gross auditing
error. These are listed as follows:
1. Failure to give a session.
2. Failure to handle an E-Meter at the level of class for the
session.
3. Disobedience of auditing directions given by the Auditing
Supervisor.
4. Use of unusual means to handle the pe or the pc's case.
5. Failure to apply items already passed in Theory and
Practical in
giving the session.
6. Nattering about the pc out of session or derogatorily
spreading the
pc's withholds.
7. Being late for session.
8. Concluding a session early.
319
9. Check of pc with a meter by the Auditing Supervisor
discloses gross
errors.
10. Check of pc with a meter by the Auditing Supervisor after a
Class II
or Class III type session discloses rudiments to have been
flagrantly
out during the session or Sec check or Prepcheck questions
unflat or
goal or lists in error.
11. Misemotion by the student auditor during session resulting
in a
termination of session.
12. A pc blowing.
13. In a Class II or Class III type of session, pc throwing down
cans.
14. Disobedience of the Auditor's Code.
15. A pc looking worse after the session, or sessions,
determined by the
Auditing Supervisor's personal observation (not
examination).
ALL AUDITING ERRORS LEADING TO NON IMPROVEMENT ARE NOT MINOR.
THEY ARE GROSS.
----------
Some tolerance must of course be employed. Cancelling Sessions
because
"TR3 is out" is insufficient reason. However, a student auditor just
plain not
answering his pc or failing to give further commands comes under No. I
above.
But at all times, the Auditing Supervisor must be alert and must
cancel sessions
where one or more of the items above are occurring. Usually several
will be
found to be out if one is.
The Auditing Section is not a practice section and may not be
treated as
such. No matter how minor is the process being run, it will be found,
because of
the processes selected for the auditing section for each class, that
the pc will
gain and come up shining if the auditing is done right. If there is
any
practising it is done in the Practical Section but no pc may be put
into session
in the Practical Section.
----------
In Academies the Auditing Supervisor is ordinarily the D of T
even when
assisted, in very large classes, by an Instructor. In any argument as
to the
validity of cancellation the Auditing Supervisor is right.
----------
Apparently this also might seem to punish the preclear. But it
will be
found that less casualties and more overall gain for the preclear will
result
from this system.
If the student auditor is cancelled and is not re-learning his
or her
Theory and Practical on a Monday posting, the Auditing Supervisor on
his own
judgment should give the pc another auditor.
Do not make the other students carry dead weight. It is expected
that a
student will give as many hours as he or she receives.
In case of flagrant and continual no-audit by a student, cancel
the
student also as a pc. This can be used as a booster on the student to
get his
Theory and Practical passed.
Handling of the student follows, approximately, these courses:
1. Giving Auditing.
2. Commits small error and is warned.
3. Audits better.
or
1. Giving Auditing.
2. Commits small error and is warned.
3. Commits same or bigger error and is Cancelled.
320
4. Re-passes Theory and Practical and is restored to Auditing
Section.
or
1. Giving Auditing.
2. Commits small error and is warned.
3. Commits same or bigger error and is Cancelled.
4. Fails to be industrious in re-passing Theory and Practical
and is
Cancelled as a pc.
5. Passes and is restored to Auditing as an auditor and then as
a pc
(to equalize give-receive auditing balance).
6. Continues to malinger and is passed to HGC.
A STUDENT MAY BE ORDERED TO THE HGC IN NO OTHER WAY AND FOR NO
OTHER REASON.
----------
There is no process to be used in the Auditing Section except
those laid
down by Policy Letters.
There is no process specified for the Auditing Section that,
correctly
used, will not produce good gains for pcs.
----------
If this system is well carried out and diligently employed the
student
will graduate from each class and from the Academy knowing that exact
Scientology works and inexact doesn't.
Scientology will spread as far as it works and no farther.
Student
auditors who know it works and can make it work will spread it far.
Student
auditors permitted to commit any or all of the gross errors listed
above will
do us all a great disservice.
So be tough. And be accurate. Use this system in training.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gLcden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
321
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MAY 1962
Issue II
All D of Ts
Do not remimeo
URGENT
QUESTIONNAIRE
Please fill out and return airmail to me. I WANT THIS BACK SOON.
Take only
one week to complete it. I need your data badly.
______________________________
___________________
HASI Location Date
_____________________________
Director of Training
You now have in your hands recent HCO Pol Ltrs including HCO Pol
Ltr of
May 24, 1962, Issue I.
This gives you a three section Academy based on pilot work done
for a
year at Saint Hill.
I want and need your comments and suggestions on these matters.
You are
to put the new Academy plan into effect at once as contained in the
policy
letters. Having done that you should fill out this questionnaire:
1. Does the system seem adequate to the training of students?
2. What part of the system is hard to understand?
3. Aside from the usual complaints about change, what student
response is
there?
4. What do you now need to help you with this system?
322
5. What processes do you feel are lacking in the Classes?
6. What basic theory is missing in the Classes just issued for
Academies?
7. What Instructor difficulties do you forecast?
8. What student difficulties do you forecast?
9. What Changes or Improvements do you advise?
10. What especially do you need from me?
Fill this in and return to me as fast as possible. All class
requirements
for Class I are conditional. As soon as I have heard from you, I will
finalize
these classes, possibly add a Class Ic or even Class Id and Ie.
Then I can give you final check sheets.
Meanwhile make do. Whatever the students pass now can be
transferred to
new sheets in a month or two.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
323
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 JUNE 1962
Central Orgs
Franchise
Field
BPI
CLASS II TRAINING
ONLY BY ACADEMIES AND SAINT HILL
Because of the upgrading of Class II Training and skills, and
the length
of time and staff needed to teach such a course, all rights to teach
Class II
Courses are hereby rescinded except for Academies and the Saint Hill
Briefing
Course.
No Saint Hill Briefing Course tape lectures are available
outside Central
Orgs, and Saint Hill.
Saint Hill graduates may, however, listen to these tapes at a
Central Org,
for their own information, by arrangement with the HCO of their area.
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1962 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 JUNE 1962
CenOCon
Franchise
BPI
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING TO BE DONE
IN ACADEMY AND SAINT HILL ONLY
As all previous experience has shown that professional training
is only
effective when done in an Academy at a Central Org, the following
basic policy
is to be adhered to without exception.
No professional course (HPA/HCA and above) or retread of any
such course
may be offered or run outside a Central Organization Academy. This
includes the
HPS (Hubbard Practical Scientologist) course, as this is run
concurrently with
the HCA/HPA course in an Academy. Saint Hill graduates are not
permitted to run
professional courses or Class II or other special courses in the
field.
This policy is instituted and reaffirmed in the interest of
students, who
are entitled to the most excellent training possible. The Academy is
the only
place where this is continuously obtainable.
Professional auditors in the field are requested to co-operate
by
encouraging the promising members of their groups to go to the Central
Org for
professional training, and meanwhile continue giving basic training in
the form
of PE-type and HAS-type courses (including Comm Course) up to non-
professional
standard. This type of training has great value in teaching the basics
of
Scientology, and improving the student's case and reality level.
The pattern of training is:
PE, HAS and other basic courses up to non-professional standard,
conducted
in the field or in the Central Org.
Professional courses to HPA/HCA and above, conducted in the
Central Org
Academy only.
Saint Hill Special Briefing Course-to ensure the final
professional
excellence and to learn clearing techniques.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
324
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JUNE 1962
CenOCon
CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
In order to expedite the issue of certificates, the Extension
Course
Director must always inform Certifications immediately, whenever an
Extension
Course Student completes an Extension Course.
A completed Extension Course is still a requirement for a
professional
certificate.
The Extension Course Director must send this information to
Certifications
in every case, whether the student is in the Academy or not at the
time of
completing his Extension Course.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 JULY 1962
Franchise
ACADEMY
EXTRA WEEKS
Any extra week payment being required of Academy students in any
Organization is abolished herewith effective on receipt of this Policy
Letter.
The mission of an Academy is to make Auditors who can audit, and
issue
them their certificates.
Should a student leave the Course and return after two weeks a
retread fee
of 30% without further grant or discount of the original HPA/HCA full
course fee
shall apply.
The Academy course has no finite duration but every effort
should be made
to graduate the student at the end of twelve weeks.
LRH:jw.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
325
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1962
CenOCon
Post Public B. Board
CERTIFICATION AND VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
(Cancels previous policies)
Effective immediately, completion of the HPA/HCA Extension
Course is
no longer regarded as a requirement for HPA/HCA certification. It is,
however,
required as a qualification for validation.
This policy is re-instituted so as to speed up the issue of
certificates.
It is emphasized that it assumes that the basic policy is being
implemented in
the Academy-namely that no auditor is released from the Academy unless
he/she
can be trusted to audit HGC preclears-this also implies that the
graduate does
know his basic data.
As there have been some changes lately in certification
requirements,
current requirements are now summarized here again:
1. Graduated successfully from Academy, all Academy
requirements
completed according to current rundown.
2. HCO Board of Review Oral and written examinations passed
100%.
3. Anatomy of Human Mind Course completed.
4. Course fees fully paid up, or satisfactory arrangements made
for
payment.
5. International membership with HASI in force.
HPA/HCA Certificates can now be issued without delay to any
persons who
have completed these requirements.
In order to obtain a red seal validation on an HPA/HCA
certificate, the
requirements are now as follows:
1. Serve one year in the Org, in the HGC or a similar post.
2. Complete the HPA/HCA Extension Course.
In addition, no higher level certificate (higher than HPA/HCA)
will be
issued to any auditor until the HPA/HCA Extension Course is completed.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.eden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
326
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1962
(Reissued from Sec ED No. 404 of Washington DC)
CenOCon
AN ARRANGEMENT OF THE ACADEMY
The closer you adhere to the exact training pattern of an
Academy as
it has been worked out at Saint Hill, the better off you're going to
be and
the easier it's going to be.
I've been working this thing over left, right and center and
it's a very
workable plan. The plan exactly consists of this:-
There are certain classes of auditors, there's Class 1a, 1b, 1c
and 2a.
These Classes each connote certain types of auditing. Class la has no
auditing;
Class 1b has some type of' auditing. The administration of the Academy
depends
upon the auditing requirements more than the classes. You get auditing
something
on this basis, you have a class of auditor and that requires certain
checksheets, and you also have a unit and, the auditor belongs to that
unit.
But if the auditor is changed-the student rather is changed-from one
unit to
another until, such as, you GAE him and this throws him into Unit W,
this
doesn't cost him his intervening class. He's still maybe a Class lb,
but he's
no longer in X unit. He can be downgraded then in his unit number
without being
downgraded in his class. It'd break his heart to cost him his class.
He's just
pulled an awful GAE and he's up there at 2a-he's in Class 2a, he's
very proud
and happy, and he's managed to prepcheck a whole list alive, clean
nothing and
leave all the rudiments smoking. He promptly becomes a W right in
there with the
new students, if he's GAE'd, until he covers the checksheet or the GAE
things
that have been assigned to him to cover before he is restored to
auditing. Then
he's restored back to his Z unit. So you see you can shift them in
unit, which
is designated by letter, without costing them their class. So an
individual
auditor is actually designated by his class, which would be Class la,
Class 1b, 1c or 2a.
That's his classification. What unit he appears in is determined
by the
current auditing he is doing and these units are Unit W, X, Y & Z. The
unit in
which he finds himself is doing certain auditing actions and you will
sometimes
GAE somebody down from one auditing activity to another auditing
activity, and
although he still retains the classes he has he's doing another type
of
auditing.
Your student body is divided up into A and B, and that's
compared to the
first letters. The W's are brand new students. They're brand new and
they don't
do any auditing, nobody'd trust them near an E-Meter, and a W is
involved
basically in just studying the fundamentals, just as undoubtedly you
have it
now. The number of W's you have are divided into A and B, and you get
the WA
then and the WB unit.
The X's are the most fundamental and the tiny bit of auditing
they do-they
do something without any Model Session or something of this sort. They
go
through some auditing motions, and they are divided into the XA and
XB, and that
gives you your teams-A audits B and B audits A. So this gives you your
auditing
assignments.
Now you get your next line, which is your Y, and your Y is doing
something
on the order of a Model Session, pocketa, pocketa, pocketa. They're
doing
something terribly fundamental like finding a Havingness process and
doing a
Model Session. This is rather elementary type auditing but
nevertheless gives
them practice in this line. Then you get your Z and that is doing the
kingpin or
the top activity that is done in the Academy, which is in this
particular case,
as we are dealing with HCA/HPA, a Problems Intensive, and when they
can do a
Problems Intensive from one end to the other of course that's your
Class 2a
Auditor, but they're auditing in Unit ZA and ZB.
This makes very easy administration and scatters your students
around and
puts them under certain control at certain times of the day and puts
them in
certain situations at certain times of the day. You get this kind of
thing going
then. You get
327
class-anytime an auditor gains his class of course he graduates up to
a new
unit and you have to keep your numbers balanced in these units; you
have to
keep the same number in both sides. It's very hard to re-arrange two
in a unit
because they will become a co-audit and you don't want that, so you
actually
have a minimum number in a unit of four and that permits them to criss-
cross so
that the auditor doesn't get audited by his own pc.
Now, let's take a look at the time scheduling in an Academy. You
got a
time schedule that goes from 9:30 to 12:30 and goes from 1:30 to 4:30
and 4:30
to 5:30 and 5:30 to 6:30, and that's an Academy day, and that goes
Monday
through Friday inclusive. Now, if you divide up your times like this,
you will
see that this is very easy to move these units around and within that
frame-work
you have three sections. Your sections consist of the Theory Section,
the
Practical Section and the Auditing Section, and there are only three
sections.
In actual fact (depending on numbers of course, that has a lot
to do with
it) there are three basic instructors. There is your Theory
Instructor, there is
your Practical Instructor, and there is your Auditing Instructor, so
the minimum
number of instructors in an Academy is three. If you had a great
number of
students these fellows would be supervisors and they would have
instructors
under them. Your Director of Training would ordinarily double in brass
as your
Auditing Instructor since this is the most knowledgeable post offhand.
Your
toughest instructor-the guy who won't stand for no nonsense no-place-
is
ordinarily your Practical Instructor, and your reassuring instructor
is
ordinarily your Theory Instructor, and that's about the way that
divides up as
to who to appoint to what post.
Now these fellows are located on the ground that they are
located on, in
other words-these fellows are located in such a way as to make a split
up of
space. Now your Director of Training would normally sit in his office
and you
use your scattery rooms, your odds and ends of rooms that you have
around, as
auditing rooms. This is a fairly practical plan if' you don't have a
perfectly
designed building for your Academy. Practical would take up the
biggest piece of
space and your Theory the next biggest piece of space.
The characteristics of these classes are that certain different
types of
auditing are going to take place, but they are not all at the same
time. So,
frankly, it doesn't really require the tremendous amounts of space
that you
think to handle the auditing section.
The Theory on the other hand is rather specialized as to
quarters, because
that's got to consist of first and foremost a room in which to study-
tape
recorder outlets and so forth are put into that room and everything
that goes on
about studying occurs in that room. Tape recorder listening is done by
earphones, not by speakers. The Theory room is usually the quiet room
and quiet
is maintained. There should be a little booth over to the side of it
or a little
adjoining ante-room of some kind, in which the Theory Instructor
lurks, so that
he can give his examinations across a desk and in quiet so that other
students
in Theory do not hear the questions he is asking and do not disturb
and are not
disturbed by the activity of examination. That's an ideal Theory set-
up. It
doesn't matter how many students you try to pack into it or how
stamped up they
are or anything. Those are not considerations. You've got to have some
outlets
for tape recorders. You've got to have some earphones, and you've got
to have
some seats for them to sit in. And then you've got to have a little
ante-room
of some kind or another for them to be examined in so they don't get
disturbed
by each one being examined. That usually carries with it a blackboard,
and the
rotation by which they are examined is determined by how they enter
their name
on the blackboard. Soon as they come in they put their name on the
blackboard.
When the instructor is ready, he just calls their name off the
blackboard.
The Practical Supervisor or Instructor is not in an ante-room,
he is right
in amongst them. But he has a desk in that room. If he has any desk
anywhere in
the Org at all, just like the Theory Instructor, he has his desk on
the premises
of his activity. He doesn't have another desk someplace, and no longer
in the
Academy do we have walking off from the class. See there's no more
walking off
from the class, that's the guy's room. So it disturbs them to have
other staff
members come in and ask him questions and other things go on, but he
uses that
just as his office space. It's not a specialized instruction space, it
is his
office space. And there he sits. And he can keep an eye on training
practice. In
Practical you've got to have a widespread eye across Training.
328
Ideally in the Auditing section you simply have a very big room.
The
teams are well spread apart. You get this other activity here-the
Auditing
Supervisor would sit in the same room and be able to keep his eye on
all the
teams and go on ahead and carry on his business of the day too. In
view of the
fact that you don't have that kind of space, Auditing Section Students
will
have to be split up into other quarters and other rooms. That isn't
quite so
good, but you can make that up with some kind of speaker system going
into
these auditing rooms on this basis:
A system like this has already been developed, and it is pretty
hard
to install and is a little bit complicated, but you hang a microphone
around
the auditor's neck and you connect the pc's cans up to a central meter
and
the meter is in the Auditing Supervisor's desk. It's the connected
meter and
it has a switchboard. Just by throwing this switchboard you get the
meter
reading and you get the auditing activity of the. auditor at the same
time.
Now in view of the auditor never knows when this is on, a great deal
of
supervision can be done. Oddly enough this isn't for a scattered
series of
rooms, this is for a wide, large room. That thing is just internally
wired,
the Instructor sits over in the corner. Therefore he never gets up and
stands
back of the pc or stands back of the auditor. He never has to approach
the
session, to know what's going on. Now this thing in its most
complicated
activity uses the microphone as a small speaker, and if you get too
outraged
this microphone being very close to the auditor's mouth it all of a
sudden can
talk back. That's a fairly ideal auditing activity. You could of
course give
him an earphone, a little plug-in earphone, that will be more
satisfactory,
but frankly any microphone acts as a speaker. So you could make these
things
talk back.
That is the type of circuit which is most ideally suited to a
bunch of
auditing sessions. It doesn't make the instructor have to approach
sessions
to give his advice, to find out what's going on, to find out how the
meter is
reading or anything else. You can use a booster on these circuits so
that the
meters are able to put out the current over the line to the auditing
meter and
the current to the other meter. There is a little bit of electronic
difficulty
as they wire them up, but those things will all be overcome.
Now, there's your Auditing Section. How do these things operate?
How does
all this operate on scheduling? Your schedule goes something on this
order-in
the morning your W's, X's & Y's, that's the A units, all appear at
9:30 in the
Theory Section. And in the morning all of the B's-W, X, Y's appear
over in the
Practical Section. Then after lunch your B Unit of the first three
letters
appears in Theory, and your A Units appear in Practical, so they get
three hours
of Practical a day and three hours of Theory a day. And everything is
done by
checksheet. Individual checksheet. There is no class activity, you get
the idea.
There isn't getting all the students together and teaching them how to
thread a
needle when half of them know how and the other half can't be taught
anyhow.
There is this individualization, but you can have this tight
scheduling along
with individualization, the checksheet gives you the individual
attention to the
student and the compartmentation of time gives him a scheduled
activity. He
knows where he's supposed to be.
That same morning, the A section of the Z group reports to their
auditing
room and they spend three hours auditing. In other words, this is the
most
important auditing so therefore we give it the most time. And there's
your three
hours of auditing, and your B Group is receiving the auditing during
that time.
Then in the afternoon the ZB's are doing the auditing and the ZA's are
receiving
auditing in the Auditing Section.
On alternate days Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, your
ZA's spend
two hours in Practical on Monday from 4:30 to 6:30. On Wednesday your
ZA's spend
two hours in Practical and ZB's their two hours in Theory. They spend
two hours
twice a week in Theory and two hours twice a week in Practical from
4:30 to
6:30. Don't try to make that class change-the 4:30 to 5:30 and then a
shift 5:30
to 6:30 because it uses too much time and commotion on a break. You
just might
as well use it that way.
You've got quite a bit of auditing space in proportion to the
number of
people that are using it, so your X Group doing its first auditing
occupies one
little piece of auditing space and they are weak, so they do do a
shift. You've
got your 4:30 to 5:30 session and you've got your 5:30 to 6:30
session. That's
just sort of a lick and a promise. It would actually be about a 50
minute
session. They flip, flop, during that afternoon, and they flip, flop
daily on
this. And then when you get up to your Y, you're doing a little more
serious
activity on this thing. It takes a little more time to do it; to get
in the
Model Session, to find the Havingness process and so forth, so you
flip
329
flop them days so it's 2 hours on Monday and they receive 2 hours on
Tuesday
and so on, you don't give them that 5:30 to 6:30. The student starts
in with
his X Group with an hour auditing session less ten minutes. When he
gets to his
Y group, he's doing a two hour stint. When he gets to his Z group,
it's a three
hour session. This graduates him up into the stamina and stick-to-
ivity of it.
That's your scheduling activity for auditing. You find all this
runs off
smooth as butter. Now, if you have limited toilet facilities and so
forth there
is another gimmick you can pull and this gimmick is a simple one. That
you
simply stagger the lunch hour 15 minutes ahead and 15 minutes behind
in your
Theory and Practical. In other words you can increase Practical 15
minutes and
decrease Theory 15 minutes, therefore they let out slightly different
times with
a 15 minute difference. This is in consideration of limited toilet
facilities,
you got other little dodges of this particular character but actually
you
mustn't upset the progress of these units through the various stints,
you find
out this balances out pretty well.
You've got to have checksheets for each one of these classes,
these
checksheets are carried out on this basis. The student has a copy and
the
instructor has a master copy and if a checksheet gets lost the signups
are on
the student's checksheet and that's just his hard luck, he has to take
the check
all over again. That's a simple penalty. In other words he mustn't
lose his
checksheet. You record this on the instructor's checksheet and so
forth-do any
recording you want to, but put the burden of keeping the record with
the student
and you'll find out you'll get into much less trouble by doing this.
You don't
have to have mounds of administration to carry this forward. Mounds of
administration tend to accumulate around it and the instructors all of
a sudden
are doing nothing but shuffle paper. We're not interested in their
shuffling
paper, we're interested in them setting students right. That's our
basic
interest. We're interested in their instructing. We're interested in
getting
people checked out. We're interested in all these other factors
involved in the
situation. We want to turn out good auditors. This system I've worked
out very
carefully, this system has been in the works at Saint Hill for some
time. I've
refined it and grooved it and found things wrong with it and I've been
planning
this up for an Academy shift. I gave warning a little while ago that
Academies
were going to follow a pattern along this line, but I hadn't perfected
the
pattern until now. It seems to me that this is quite feasible. I
thought it over
with regard to quarters and numbers of instructors available and I
think it will
make a very successful Academy.
The role of the Academy of course is to turn out auditors that
can be
employed in the HGC. They have to be good enough to be used on the HGC
at once.
Certification requirements recently have been reduced to the fact that
if the
fellow goes through the school he gets his certificate. There's been
nothing
else hanging up on this. To get his certificate in hand, of course, he
must have
paid his training fee and other people hang things on this in other
departments.
But my basic intention is that a certificate is put in his hot paw the
moment he
finishes up and gets examined. HCO should have its Board of Review
capable and
ready to examine the papers of this person. In spite of the
checksheets there is
another general examination at the end of his Academy training period.
And the
results on his pcs also count on this, if he has audited a pc through
a Problems
Intensive where he can point out certain definite results. That,
however,
sometimes gets balled up, people get transferred on pcs and he can't
point to a
single result. So that's not paramount, but his auditing skill must be
taken
into account.
The point that must be driven home with a student is that the
Auditing
Section is not a training section. 1 just kill 'em on sight if they
start
developing this idea. They are not in the Auditing Section to learn
how to
audit. They are in the Auditing Section to DO AUDITING. If you get any
instructor who regards the Auditing Section of any of these training
units as a
place where they learn how to do it kick them in the head, Mac, and
send him
someplace else-send him down to Central Files or something, but don't
keep him
on training. When they're in there, that auditing has got to look
good. And if
that auditing being done isn't looking good and isn't producing
results, there's
only one thing that the auditing supervisor does. He shows the auditor
which
direction the cases are taking, that has nothing to do with auditing
you see. He
shows him which direction these cases are taking and the logical
course to
pursue.
Now if' there's anything wrong with this fellow's Model Session,
if
there's anything wrong with his finding Havingness Processes, if
there's
anything wrong with
330
his approach to Prepchecking-he doesn't learn it in the Auditing
Section! He
is simply GAE'd-that means Gross Auditing Error-his name is posted on
the board,
and if this person during the week he is given the GAB fails to make
it up and
get his checksheet (it'll be a little special checksheet he's got to
make up
now)-if he fails to make it up and hasn't got it totally caught up,
then he is
GAE'd as a pc in the following week. That is the penalty of not making
up a GAB
in the same week that it is given. That's a God-help-us proposition.
How does a person get a GAB? There's several ways: 1. By
observation of
the auditing he's doing. The Auditing Instructor is not supposed to
hang up over
the back of his neck and say no, no, no, you ask about a Present Time
Problem as
the 3rd rudiment, you see. He hasn't got any business doing that at
all. It's
just observation. Is this guy functional? Is he working as an auditor?
Does he
look like an auditor? How are his TRs and so forth? That's all. He
looks like an
auditor. Okay. Now, the next one is the condition of the pc when
inspected. That
starts with, simply, you see a pc, he's drifting around and he looks
in a
horrible fog and he doesn't know if he's coming or going. That is
enough for a
GAB. Auditing is supposed to make people feel better. We don't care
how much
trouble this person's had. We don't care how mean the instructors are
to him. An
hour session should have straightened him out. You get this very tough
look at
the situation. The third method, of course, is by graphs, progress and
so forth
as represented by the various papers of auditing which are auditing
report
forms. Auditing report forms are done by students on all sessions
every day.
They are handed in to the auditing supervisor who is supposed to look
at these
things and hand them back. In the following day's Session. He puts
them out
there in baskets, where the auditor can pick them up.
An Academy has a number of things that it has to cope with and
amongst
these things is students getting entangled in their personal lives and
getting
so messed up in a personal relation and this kind of thing that he
can't study.
It's very much in our interest to prevent that sort of thing. So you
have a very
tough set of regulations. The penalty for breaking these regulations
or any one
of these regulations is an infraction thesis which you all know well.
You make
the student turn it in, Saying in so many hundred words he's got to
give you all
the hot dope on this and that. Now there's terrific injustice in this
and
there's a lot of danger in this infranction system because you're
liable to miss
withholds. And then the student winds up angry as hell about it all
and that
sort of thing. If any better system to keep the rules and regulations
in force
could be devised, why that would be fine. That would be very
acceptable to me.
In the meantime, the only one we have that has worked at all is the
infraction
thesis. That's pretty gruesome, has a lot of things wrong with it.
Alright,
that's the discipline.
An Academy is as full as its snap and pop, and don't make any
mistakes
about this. Academy enrolment has very little to do with the
Registrar. It has
everything to do with the quality of the Academy. Sounds awfully
funny. A bad
Academy empties almost at once. There's no new enrolments in a badly
run
Academy. A good Academy mysteriously picks up a lot of enrolments.
We've learned
this over the years. It's the funniest darn thing you ever wanted to
see. You
never figure out how anybody found out. You hardly have time for them
to find
out. If the HGC drops in quality it takes 6 or 7 months to go down the
drain as
far as income and pcs are concerned, and it takes another 6 or 7
months to pick
up again. This is not true about the Academy. It will do it in a week.
It's just
one of the most sudden things you'd want to see happen.
What looks like a good Academy is having instructors know their
business,
and Schedules that are kept. A precise scheduling and instructors that
know
their business. And nobody puts up with anything but excellent
auditing. Now
that is a good Academy in the estimation of students. A bad Academy is
one that
is kind, is nice, that helps them out. The Theory Instructor is just,
not
pleasant, but kind. A person comes in and there is a bulletin to be
examined
"What are the buttons used in Prepchecking?" The fellow says, "Well, I
didn't
quite get that far," and the Instructor says, "Oh, come on now, does
careful,
careful, mean anything to you?" This type of examination, man, is
cutting the
poor student's throat. They'll turn a student out of there who will
one day be
sitting in an auditing chair who won't know which direction is up or
down or
South! In other words, they've done the guy a rotten dirty trick.
So it's precision of information, the demands put on the student
concerning the information, the precision of the scheduling, and the
fact you
don't put up with anything less than perfection. That's what makes a
good
Academy in the public estimation, not necessarily my estimation, but
in public
estimation.
331
As far as the length of time in an Academy is concerned we do
care how
long a student stays in the Academy. We do care, because he's using up
usable
quarters, and the slower he learns the more of a liability he is to
us.
You have this difficulty in an Academy; the one thing that can
snap
somebody around and completely change his life is finding his goal.
And you're
not finding Academy students' goals. This is a tough rap, so you just
have to
climb the hill without that assist, because I have now found out that
those
people who do worst can only really be remedied by having their goal
found. You
get somebody who is really stumbling, there is simply nothing you can
do short
of finding that person's goal; that will snap them out of it just like
that.
There isn't any remedy short of that. That's what you got to put up
with. But
you have a terrific process in this Problems Intensive. This is a
terrific
package. It'll do some marvellous things one way or the other and
therefore
(and this is going to be incorporated at Saint Hill) I wouldn't have a
slow
student hang on and on and on and on and on and on month after month
after
month after month in an Academy.
When it became very obvious to me that this student was going to
be
terribly, terribly slow and learning impossible to him, instead of
cutting the
student's throat for him, I would send him to the HGC. But the only
thing I
would permit him to buy would be the thing that finds his goal. Now
that is
very difficult because HGCs are not necessarily rigged for this. But I
am
telling you though, that this is what we must do. We can't send him
over there
to get him some Prepchecking, or some Sec Checking, or something like
that,
because it's not going to do him any good. We've got to find this
fellow's
Dynamic and his Item and his Goal. We don't care about getting it
listed, but
we got to find that far-and you all of a sudden will find this fellow
straightening Out. We're going to start doing that at Saint Hill very
shortly.
The economics of it are very difficult to handle at Saint Hill,
because a person
comes there for Training and there is no HGC at Saint Hill.
----------
NOTE; Up to here this Sec ED has been a transcription of a tape
L. Ron
Hubbard made during a Technical Conference with the Technical
Staff of
the FC-DC on Sept 7, AD 12.
The following are notes taken by Eleanore Turner at the same
conference
after LRH had ceased to record on tape.
----------
How to handle a new student ARC broke with life and everything:
Give him
a reality on Scientology. The solution is too simple. Give him a
simple tenet
of Scientology and tell him to find things about it he can agree with-
keep him
at it. Four students at Saint Hill were set up in two teams of two,
and in turn
wrote up on a blackboard 12 things they could agree with about a pc
(and about
an E-Meter). Three of these four were phenomenally better thereafter.
I could
talk to the other, have a long talk with him, and possibly square him
around.
----------
A relatively unteachable person is one whose goal is an overt
against Scientology.
----------
The chief use of the TV in the Academy is for rudiments
checkouts by the
instructor on Friday afternoons. Students are GAE'd on this-so they
are alert
during a demonstration. Missed withhold check should be added to the
Friday
rudiments check, "Do you have a withhold that hasn't been cleared up
on you?"
The other Academy use is occasionally an Instructor demonstrates how a
session
should be done. And the TV in the Central Org is used in Staff Auditor
Training
Programme.
----------
If you follow too closely any rules, it becomes a Simple Simon
idiocy. You
have a well trained D of T, Tech Director, etc. Too many rules
invalidates these
people. These people introducing too many innovations defeats the
purpose of the
training activity. You need to strike a happy medium in carrying out
the rules.
Don't take the datum that students don't have cases to mean that you
can't
occasionally pull missed withholds, when that action is called for.
Rule that D
of P must not audit is simply that he must not sign himself up to give
intensives. To say that an auditor can't audit is idiocy.
There's no gradient from simply acknowledging what someone says
and
putting
332
him on the B-Meter to find out. You can't straighten out by
administration
what needs to be handled on an B-Meter. You say to the natterer-"Yes,
we know
it's all wrong, we know there isn't a toilet for the women, we're
doing
something about that-now take these cans, has a withhold been missed
on you?"
----------
The "Idiot meter" has been in the works since 1952-an E-Meter
which shows
a red light on a read and stays lit until the read is cleared. Maybe
we'll have
it this year or 1975 or 2000. Working on one in London now-may be it.
----------
The Mark V is not as good as the Mark N-but is a gorgeous goal-
finding E-
Meter. Only a well trained auditor can use a Mark V. It will be
available, it
will not replace the Mark IV.
Use E-Meter drills I, II and III, as follows, over and over-not
flattening
one at a time, but in rotation. Eventually the student can read the
meter.
E-Meter I - Reach and withdraw from B-Meter.
E-Meter II - Student A sitting in any posture with B-Meter held
in any way
he wants to hold it. Looking at meter. Student B sitting reading a
bulletin that
he needs to study anyway (no need to waste time). He's not reading it
aloud.
(This drill gets more screwed up-more alteration to it than any
other.) When the
meter ticks, the student A says to himself "read". (He doesn't say it
to student
B, or to an instructor, and NOT to a coach.) Having called a dozen or
so reads
he now calls clean every time he sees the meter not doing anything.
Then he
calls reads. Student gets dopey and funny things happen, he wants to
tell the
instructor about strange reads he has seen-we're NOT INTERESTED. All
this drill
is supposed to teach is when it reads it reads and when it's clean
it's clean-
gets rid of significances on it. PLEASE KEEP IT SIMPLE.
E-Meter III - Student reading bulletin goes along reading (NOT
aloud)-when
the student reading the meter sees a tick, he asks "what did you just
read",
having student B read it again, out loud now. The essence of this
drill is the
recovery of that read and finding out what that fellow didn't agree
with.
Getting him to take it up with you a little-the student finds Out
about two-way
comm. The majority of auditors think the meter reads on their own
voices, that
it doesn't have a thing to do with pcs. On B-Meter 111 they find out
that when a
guy thinks something the meter reads. Now he finds out that the E-
Meter reads on
disagreements. The student finally cognites that student B doesn't
understand
the bulletin. He gets missionary about it. Don't stop the student,
it's not an
auditing session-it is all right for him to help the other fellow.
Instructors can let students in on ARC break read-show them by
cleaning up
the ARC break.
The drill has got to be loose-otherwise the student doesn't
learn a.
thing.
----------
Many are called but few are chosen. Most of the students go
through the
course, they only have to pass their regular requirements and get
their
certificates. But sometimes the instructor picks a student near
graduation and
says, "You get Joe Blitz and straighten him out." If this auditor
can't do this
he's about 1000 hours short of being a good Scientologist. You might
have the
six students about to graduate straighten up the six beginning who are
having
difficulties. Get your students to take care of their fellow
Scientologists.
There are a lot of ways of handling these things that don't come
under
routine action.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
333
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1962
CenOCon
Franchise
Field
BPI
Magazine
CLEARS MUST BE TRAINED
It is standard knowledge that a one-goal Clear is a very capable
person.
A two-goal Clear is a human dynamo.
It should also be recognised that though they have these
capabilities
they are not, unless trained as an HPA/HCA, educated and are therefore
incapable
of utilising this released action and ability to the greatest good of
the
greatest number of dynamics.
An untrained Clear can, through non-education, become a severe
embarrassment not through bad intention but solely because he wants to
get
something done. He wants to help but doesn't know how.
It therefore becomes mandatory that as soon as the first goal
has gone to
a free needle and been checked out fully by a Class IV Auditor as a
1st-goal
Clear, the individual must receive and complete training of HPA/FICA
level
BEFORE proceeding any further with auditing on his own case.
LRH:dr.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 31 May 1963, Training of Clears, page 341.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 OCTOBER 1962
CenOCon
HPA/HCA WRITTEN EXAMINATION
Because HPA/HCA students have a chance to not confront taking
their
written examinations and thus postpone until sometimes they eventually
never
take this exam, thus causing an incipient ARC Break with the
Organization,
no HPA/HCA student should be released from the Academy until he/she
has fully
completed all the requirements for his/her certificate.
LRH:jw.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
334
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 OCTOBER 1962
Sthil
Academies
AUDITING SUPERVISOR AND AUDITING INSTRUCTORS,
DUTIES OF
On the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course and in Academies,
Supervision
of the Auditing Section is done by the Auditing Supervisor, and
Auditing
Instructor or Instructors.
The Auditing Supervisor and Instructors are not there to audit
cases. This
can be a most serious error-using the Auditor only as a robot. This is
done in a
Co-Audit. It is not done in an auditing section. The auditors being
taught in
the auditing section are under a heavy discipline-the discipline that
they must
follow procedure and obtain results. A bad auditing presence, a
squirrelly
approach, a failure to use what they are taught, can cause two things
to happen:
(a) A Pink Sheet on what they must re-do in Theory and
Practical or:
(b) A GAB to the next lowest classification for retraining.
The Auditing Section is that section of a training course where
auditing
occurs. It is not where auditing is taught. It is that section where
auditing is
experienced, as an auditor, as a preclear. Auditing is taught in
theory and
practical. It is only guided in the Auditing Section.
AUDITING ASSIGNMENTS
The Auditing Supervisor (or in some cases the Course Supervisor
as at
Saint Hill) assigns all sessions and teams. The following rules are
observed
in this assignment of auditors:
(a) No auditor may be assigned to an upper Auditing level until
he or
she has passed the Theory and Practical Check Sheets of the
lower
auditing levels. In other words, Only when an auditor is
prepared
in Theory and Practical is he or she assigned to auditing
in the
next classification.
(b) No Co-Audit is to occur, by which is meant there is no
auditor
auditing his own auditor. This makes a minimum of four in a
class.
(c) Rock Slammers (as by Sec Check) are assigned to audit Rock
Slammers
and be audited by Rock Slammers as this tends to protect
other
students from bad auditing and yet lets the Rock Slammers
progress.
(d) Change of auditors is avoided as may be found practical.
Auditing Assignments are posted by class time on a Monday and
are seldom
changed through the week.
AUDITING ATMOSPHERE
Students are heavily indoctrinated into two major maxims about
being an
auditor:
(a) If the auditor is warm and breath can be detected, he or
she is in
condition to audit. An Academy or course takes no interest
in the
case of the auditor. Courses where attention is dominantly
on the
case of the student and not his ability to audit are always
bad
courses. It is true that people, while they cannot
postulate
themselves clear, don't have to act aberrated. A thetan can
rise
superior to his aberrations. Thus, the less worry about how
a student
has to be audited before he or she can audit, the better.
Scientology
is a bootstrap operation. If this idea of "not in case
shape to
audit" or "not in condition to audit" is let creep in, then
we'll
never make it. So, if they're warm and breath can be
detected, they
can audit.
(b) Auditing in a common room is noisy and hard on preclears
and
auditors. But auditing can be done under such conditions,
it makes a
much better auditor. Preclears soon get used to it. So no
attention
is given as to how quiet it must be "because of the
preclear".
Admittedly these two factors (a and b) contain unrealities. This
is a case
of that's the way it is.
335
SCHEDULING TIME
Sharp Scheduling, on the dot, is the mark of a successful
Academy.
Sessions must begin and end on schedule.
It's part of instruction that the Auditor never be late for a
session
and to end sessions on the dot.
Time of Session must be tightly adhered to and enforced.
INFRACTION SHEETS
The disciplinary weapon is the Infraction Sheet.
An auditing Supervisor does not give these out for bad auditing,
however.
He gives these out only for Infractions of the Rules of the Academy,
including
a refusal to follow his auditing directions. Bad technical is handled
by Pink
Sheet and GAEs.
OBSERVATION OF AUDITING
There are three sources of observing auditing used by the
Auditing
Supervisor and Instructors. These are
(a) Direct observation of the session;
(b) Study of the Auditor's Report;
(c) Observation of the Preclear.
The Auditing Supervisor combines all three, giving the most time
to
(a) Direct observation of the session.
THE PINK SHEET
Fasten a packet of long (legal) pink paper, about 16 substance,
to a
clip board. Put three pieces of long carbon paper in place to use the
first
four sheets. Use a black ball point pen. Put a student's name at the
top of
the sheet. Put in the date.
Sit down near the session or use other inspection devices.
Note what the auditor is making mistakes with.
On the left hand side of the paper, in column, write down the
exact
HCO Bulletins and Drills this Auditor must do in Theory and Practical.
Keep the sheets together. Look over the Auditor's report later.
Re-insert
the carbons and put down any further things the auditor must do.
Keep one sheet in a basket. Give the Theory Instructor one, give
the
Practical Instructor one. Give one to the student.
If by the week ending nearest after two weeks from date, the
student
has not completed this Pink Sheet, he or she is GAE'd to the next
lowest class
to complete it and any others before being raised again.
This is wholly independent of and in addition to the regular
check sheets
for classes.
Thus a thorough inspection of an individual student's auditing
need be
made only once every two weeks.
Nothing in the Pink Sheet System prevents comments on the
Auditor's
reports or personal discussion with him or her on emergency remedies
by note
during a session.
GAE
Gross Auditing Error (GAE) is the action of the Auditing
Supervisor when
the Pink Sheet is not completed by the Student or when, in the opinion
of the
Auditing Supervisor, the errors being made are so gross that a
preclear is being
heavily damaged (such as Auditor's Code breaches).
A "GAE" may consist of relegating the Auditor to the next lowest
class or,
if violent and flagrant, and directly against an Instructor's
instructions, to
the lowest unit of the Academy.
336
Only in two cases may a GAE be substituted for an Infraction
Sheet, and
in both cases the student is sent to the lowest unit. First is the
flagrant
and dogged refusal to follow an order relating to technical matters
and the
second is breaking Rule 28. These two may not be permitted to come in
conflict.
A student's check sheets are not torn up by any GAB, but one
that places
the student back in the lowest unit causes the student to re-do all
his auditing
and re-pass it.
FORMS
A form for each pc undergoing clearing, giving the steps, must
be part
of the pc's folder and kept up by the auditor. This is based on the
above data.
If a pc has had a recent Problems Intensive and now signs a
Clearing
Contract this is made part of the Clearing rundown, if done, however,
by an
outside auditor, the pc must be given another Problems Intensive.
A Special Form showing all steps and evidence of a clear must be
sent
to me.
The idea is to get results, to turn out clears and to keep
HPAs/HCAs
well occupied and at a high technical level.
ACCIDENTAL GOAL FINDING
It will happen that in cleaning up old goals found or even by
sudden
disclosure, the HPA/HCA staff auditor may find a goal that fires and
is the
goal. If so, it is checked out by the Goals Finder and listed unless
other
orders are given regarding the pc (such as unburdening the goal). -
HPAs/HCAs are not, however, to attempt to find goals at this
time and
it is highly illegal for an HGC to employ non Saint Hill Graduates to
find
goals no matter what the public pressure. It could be very destructive
to
Scientology to have a lot of wrong goals about or getting listed.
In due course this last injunction will be released so far as
Tiger
Drilling the 850 list by HPAs/HCAs is concerned. But wait until
technology
is better. This will apply only to experienced staff auditors.
METERS
Only the latest Mark Meters are to be used by Goal Finders. Mark
IV
and onwards may be used by HPAs/HCAs.
It would be dishonest to use less.
SUMMARY
HGCs must afford public Clearing of individuals. Clearing Co-
Audits of
the public are a special role and are to be relegated to District
Offices as
soon as possible. It is no part of my plans to retain them in a
Central Org
or City Office.
Only the highest technology and most exact adherence to policy
can keep
us afloat at this time. These are not ordinary policies. These are
survival
itself for Scientology. -
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
337
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 NOVEMBER 1962
CenOCon
URGENT
OBJECTIVE ONE
I HAVE KICKED THE DOOR OPEN.
FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE 1950 ALL WRAPS ARE OFF.
THIS IS IT.
OUR FIRST OBJECTIVE IS:
GET ALL PERSONS EVER ENROLLED IN AN ACADEMY
AUDITED ON AND TRAINED TO USE ROUTINE 2-12,
THE UNDERCUT FOR ALL CASES.
This marks the beginning of a heavy rapid advance toward our
objectives
of a cleared Earth and is Objective One in that advance.
Use all means at your disposal to effect the accomplishment of
this
objective.
Routine 2-12 is a safe, powerful primary clearing action and
will produce
rapid case gains.
The objective is to be attained by the following actions:
1. Get all staff HPAs/HCAs and all auditors checked out on a Class
IIb check
sheet as per HCO Bulletin of November 23, AD 12.
2. Get all staff HPAs/HCAs rapidly using R2- 12 in staff clearing.
3. Get all Academy students checked out on Class IIb perfunctorily
at once
and run on R2-l2.
4. Get all HGC pcs run on R2-12, particularly HPAs/HCAs or former
Academy
enrollees.
5. Contact all persons ever enrolled in an Academy, whether
graduated or
not, and get them in to be run on and to learn Routine 2-12.
6. Contact all Scientologists who are being run on goals or who
have been
cleared and get them run on Routine 2-12.
The amounts to be charged for auditing and retreading are
entirely up
to the Association/Organization Secretary, with only the injunction
that the
organization remain solvent or become so.
Do not underplay the fact that Routine 2-12 is actually a vital
clearing
step. And do not hold it back because it is a precise skill.
THE HCO SEC AND THE ASSOCIATION SEC SHOULD REPORT TO ME
REGULARLY ON ALL
SUCCESSES AND FORWARD PROGRESS WITH OBJECTIVE ONE.
OBJECTIVE TWO
Objective Two consists of forming District Offices wherever
there are
centres or field offices. This objective is in a pilot stage but is
progressing.
It does not conflict with Objective One.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
338
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS. OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1963
Issue II
Academies -
Sthil Students
ACADEMY TAUGHT PROCESSES
The following processes must be taught in all Academies:
1. The C.CHs.
2. Assists.
3. ARC Straightwire.
4. General 0/W.
5. Pulling Missed Withholds.
6. Assist type Prepchecking using Suppress and Invalidate
buttons only
using a time period.
7. General Repetitive Prepchecking against a specific time
period, big
Mid Ruds
and 18 button prepchecks.
8. Specific Repetitive-Prepchecking against a: subject,
(auditing,
listing, Item or
Goal).
9. A Problems Intensive.
10. Routine 2-1 2A.
11. Routine 3-M.
-----------
It is recommended that all these are not taught in one course.
An HPA/HCA
certificate should include up to 9 above (Problems Intensive).
A higher level course should take in Routines 2 and 3 (BScn or
Hubbard
Clearing Scientologist).
The higher course need not be a completely separate course but
run along
with the usual Academy Course on different check sheets.
A Saint Hill Graduate must be in close supervision of a course
teaching
Routines 2-12A and 3. 2-10 and 2-12 are now included as 2-12A.
HPA/HCAs of earlier years, certificate in hand, may be entered
as trying
for BScn or HCS (US) even though passing the Prepcheck materials as
well as
Routines 2 and 3.
No Classification may be assigned by reason of course attendance
and
examination only. Time on Staff or Saint Hill training are required
for a Valid
Classification even though "Valid for 2-1-2" is stamped on a
certificate.
With processes settling down we can get our house in order.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
339
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill-Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MARCH AD 13
CenOCon
Franchise
CLASSIFICATION OF AUDITORS
CLASS II & GOALS
(Modifies all HCO Policy Letters on Classes of Auditors)
Goals finding is declared herewith to be a Class II activity.
Using Class II goal finding skills as released, any Class II
Auditor may
employ them to find goals.
Running the goal found on -Routine 3 processes is not authorized
for Class
II Auditors.
This authorization is based on the following technical
discoveries:
1. It is highly beneficial to a case to have-goals finding
processes run
on it, regardless of whether a goal is found or not; -
2. The only danger in finding a wrong goal lies in running it;
3. The public at large can understand and respond to the
finding- of a
basic purpose;
4. I have made a breakthrough in expediting the finding of
goals.
5. The longest period in clearing is now Goal Finding.
Any goal found may be Prepchecked by a Class II Auditor using
standard
prepchecking.
No goal found may be run on Routine 3 processes by a Class II
auditor.
Any goal found must be checked out by a Class IV Auditor.
A correct goal may be run on Routine 3 processes by a Class III
Auditor
under the supervision of a Class IV Auditor.
CLASS II AWARD
Class II may be awarded by reason of attendance and satisfactory
completion of an Academy Course specifically designated for Class II
or
satisfactory work in an HGC.
CLASS III AWARD
A Class III may be awarded to auditors satisfactorily completing
an
advanced Academy Course and satisfactory work under staff contract in
an HGC.
SAINT HILL AWARDS
Class III and N awards are given to Saint Hill graduates who
satisfactorily complete their training for these classes.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
340
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MAY 1963
CenOCon
Franchise
Field
BPI
Magazine
TRAINING OF CLEARS
(Cancels HCO Policy Letter of Sept 27, 1962,
Clears Must Be Trained.)
HCO Policy Letter of September 27, 1962 Clears Must Be Trained,
is hereby
cancelled.
However, it should be borne in mind that education in
Scientology is
highly desirable for all who obtain Scientology processing. Continual
efforts
should be made to get all such to read Scientology books, to take PE
courses,
Extension courses and HPA courses, even if they do not intend to
become
professional auditors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
341
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill-Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 JUNE AD13
Central Orgs
Academies
SCIENTOLOGY TRAINING
TECHNICAL STUDIES
All Academy Students will be expected as an early activity in
training to
acquire a knowledge of the Time Track and engram running.
Modernized material on this subject is now being released.
A Revised Curriculum for Academies places in the hands of the
HCA/HPA the
fundamental skills of auditing as follows:
1. The CCHs
2. Self Analysis version of ARC Processes (for training
auditing
practice)
3. The Time Track
4. ARC Straight Wire Modern Version
5. Withholds
6. Dating by meter
7. Locating and Indicating By-Passed Charge
8. Engram running by Chains
9. Routine 3N
10. Programming Cases
In addition it is expected that the common academic subjects be
retained
such as Model Session, Scales, Axioms, the E-Meter, etc.
However, it is clearly visible that no auditor would be worthy
of the name
if he or she did not have the above listed skills at his or her
command. All
other types of processing may be dropped.
LRH:gl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JULY 1963
CenOCon
HPA/HCA CERTIFICATE CHECK SHEET
The attached cheek-sheet is to be put into effect for all new
HPA/HCA
students and for all those students presently attending Academies.
I do not want to have any more certification delays.
An HPA/HCA student should not be regarded as graduated and
should not be
released from the Academy until his check sheet as attached is fully
completed.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
342
HPA/HCA CERTIFICATE CHECK SHEET
ROUTE IN ORDER:
1. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING ORIGINATES ON DAY STUDENT ENTERS CLASS WORK.
_________________________________________________________________
PRINT NAME AS STUDENT WANTS IT ON CERTIFICATE
Signature of Director of Training
___________________(date)________
2. HCO BOARD OF REVIEW/CERTIFICATIONS
A. Certificate sent to be made up __________(date).
Number________
B. Recorded in log book and sent to WW for LRH to
sign._______(date)
C. Received back and filed in Val Doc ___________(date).
__________
Signature
___________________________
3. ACCOUNTS
Is course paid for or other satisfactory arrangement made for
payment?
Yes _____.No _____.Signature Accts
_____________________(date)________
4. MEMBERSHIPS
Does student have International Membership in force? Yes_____
No______
Expiration Date________ Signature Memberships____________
(date)_______
5. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING
Student has completed class work ________________________
(date)_______
Signature Director of Training
6. DIRECTOR OF PROCESSING
Oral Exam given________ (date), Written Exam given ___________
(date)
Signature Director of Processing __________________________________
(Attach Oral Exam Check Sheet, Auditor Reports and student's Answer
Sheets)
7. HCO BOARD OF REVIEW
A. Oral and Written Exams reviewed and graded
_________________(date)
Flunked Oral _____________(date) Flunked
Written.___________(date)
Passed Oral ______________(date) Passed Written
____________(date)
If either or both flunked, Check Sheet is returned to Director of
Training
and exam papers sent to Academy Admin to file in Student's Folder.
If both exams passed, student may then make certificate
application, and
exam papers are sent to Academy Admin to file in Student's Folder.
B. Certificate Application completed _____Not completed._____
(date)_______
If Certificate Application is not completed, Check Sheet is
returned to
Director of Training and Certificate Application form sent to -
Academy
Admin to file in Student's Folder.
If Certificate Application form completed, it is attached to Check
Sheet
and:-
8. HCO BOARD OF REVIEW/CERTIFICATIONS
A. Memberships rechecked if past expiration date in 4 above. If
no present
membership graduate is told to get one immediately.
B. Certificate dated (________), sealed and issued to
graduate_______(date)
C. Recorded in log book _______ Address/CF informed _______ HCO
WW
informed_______
Signature of HCO Bd Review/Certifications
_____________________________________
9. ACADEMY ADMINISTRATOR files Check Sheet and Certificate
Application form in
Student's Folder and transfers folder to Auditor's file.
10. If graduate not going on staff, HCO FRANCHISE SECRETARY WW
notified of name
and address of graduate for inclusion of HCO WW Field mailings.
Alternatively graduate applies for HCO Franchise immediately on
graduation,
if situated outside a promulgated Central Org Control Area. If
situated
within a Central Org Control Area, graduate placed on Interim DO
arrangements.
343
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1963
CenOCon
Franchise
Students Sthil
Not for M.A. CURRENT PLANNING
(Staff Meeting Material)
It may help you to know the immediate future planning in
Scientology.
Research-wise O.T. is wrapped up. It's just a matter of getting
the data
out, getting it applied. The Track is complicated. The length of time
in
processing is long. But this is offset by the fact that IF YOU GET
CONSISTENT TA
ACTION THE CASE WILL EVENTUALLY MAKE O.T.
ORGANIZATION OF SUBJECT
I am dividing Scientology data into five levels and I think you
will see
the usefulness of this. -
FIRST LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY ONE
Useable data about living - and life, applicable without
training,
presented in Continental Magazines and booklets. This is for anyone.
It contains
assists as its auditing level. You have much of this already around.
It is a
complete unit in itself. "Be Right With Scientology."
SECOND LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY TWO
Academy HPA/HCA accomplishment level. Scientology for use in
spiritual
healing. This is a healing strata, using the wealth of past processes
which
produced results on various illnesses. I am shortly sending out
questionnaires
to get all Healing process results as a research project. The auditing
level is
Reach and Withdraw and Repetitive Processes. The target is human
illness. We
have never entered this field but as we are not thanked for staying
out of it,
we might as well dominate it. It is a good procurement area.
THIRD LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY THREE
Clearing and O.T. preparatory levels including advanced auditing
above
HPA/HCA Level. The work on this was more or less suspended when it
became
obvious that O.T. had to be attained. Includes key out, clearing and
other sub
O.T. states. However, much technology exists on it. This is the level
of the
better human being.
FOURTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FOUR
Processes to O.T., Saint Hill Special Briefing Course 1963 type
technology
and targets.
FIFTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FIVE
Scientology applied at a high echelon to social, political and
scientific
problems. This requires the earlier levels and a high state of
training on
theoretical and wide application levels.
Data for levels one to four is mostly already researched, most
of it is in
your hands and many publications already exist. Level Three needs a
lot of
codifying but is not difficult to assemble. You'll see a lot of Level
One now
from me for magazines and a lot of new booklets using older materials.
Level
Four is more or less complete, more so now than three.
This brings a lot of order to our technical and gets us past the
"past
lives"
344
scramble and other points which slow dissemination by relegating these
to upper
levels. Lord knows we have enough fascinating data at Level One
without feeding
the public Level Four.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
We are neating up the corporate structures of Scientology, using
each org
as a company whose majority shares are owned by a central company.
This makes
the structure easier to handle and better off for tax purposes. The
instructions
on this will soon be released. Shares and Life Memberships-will all be
properly
adjusted.
ORGANIZATIONAL ATTITUDE
Finding exactly who we're up against on Earth (the A.M.A.)
helped. But
finding exactly what each one of us faces and how in the Between Lives
Area bids
for a change of mood.
We're not now in this for play. Our personal futures depend on
keeping
going and making no major flubs. It isn't a question of is there
something else.
There isn't, Nobody can be half in and half out of Scientology.
Scientologists
are Scientologists no matter what they do for a living.
If we're going to make this we have to work at it personally,
administratively and as a group and work well.
The prize is regaining self and going free. The penalty for our
failure is
condemnation to an eternity of pain and amnesia for ourselves and for
our
friends and for this planet,
If we fail we've had it. It's not just a matter of getting
killed. It's a
matter of getting killed and killed and killed life after life forever
more.
Even if you have no great reality on this now you will soon enough.
But probably
you already understand it.
Those guys up there mean business. We've got to match or better
their
energy level and dedication or we lose.
We've been given this priceless chance.
We must make good.
The hour lost on natter, the slow down time because of some
petty ARC
Break have to be salvaged.
We haven't any time for doubts and maunderings.
We're the elite of Planet Earth, but that's only saying we're
the not
quite gone in the graveyard of the long gone.
Somehow, despite our condition and the degraded environment
we're in,
we've got to keep the dedication and the guts to carry through no
matter what
comes. And carry through.
And that's our future.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard [See also HCO Policy Letter 21 August 1963,
Change of
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Organization Targets, Volume 2,
Page 95.]
345
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 APRIL 1965
Remimeo
TECH
LEVEL 0 COMM COURSE
All Level 0 courses wherever taught must begin with the Dublin
type PE
Comm Course. -
It will be called the Zero Comm Course.
This consists of the same TRs as the real Comm Course but run
without the
coaching flunking.
The TRs were released in London after 1956.
Naturally this may not be put in on students already in the 0
course at
the time this is received but may be begun on the next students to
enrol on that
course the first Monday after this is received.
Itsa, with its premature acknowledgements has not been
successful in
making good auditors. What is needed is auditors who will run
processes without
dawdling or changing the commands or changing the process because the
pc had a
somatic. Auditing worked better when we didn't train pcs to itsa for
hours on
one command. We used to do much better on repetitive commands. It was
how many
commands were answered per unit of auditing time that made cases gain.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
346
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MAY 1965
Issue III
Remimeo
Students
TECH DIVISION
ACADEMY
COURSES
GENERAL REMARKS
ZERO COURSES
HUBBARD RECOGNIZED SCIENTOLOGIST
On all new check sheets of Zero Courses, include the following
on both the
(Theory) Certificate Course and the (Practical) Classification Course:
1. E-Meter Tone Arm.
2. Analysis of Case Condition by Tone Arm.
3. HCO Policy Letter of Apr 2, 1965 and (on Classification
Course) drills
for same.
TRS WITH METER
All Academy TRS will now be done with an &Meter before the
student and his
coach holding the cans, whether the Meter is being used or not.
AUDITOR'S REPORT
All Academy TRs and auditing for supervisor inspection must have
an
Auditor's Report form close to the student's hand, whether kept or
not.
Materials on how to keep an Auditor's Report must be included on
both Zero
Courses (Certificate and Classification).
If a report is actually written during the drill or session the
student
must be made to put it carefully in a folder and file it.
This is all part of his training.
FIRM POLICY
A student must be trained only with the tools of his trade to
hand.
Therefore in an Academy the Supervisor must not omit what an
auditor
actually uses in sessions whether it is covered in the levels training
or not.
This therefore includes a card table, a ball point, as well as a
Meter and
a "preclear" and an Auditor's Report.
Do NOT let a student be trained with the tools absent. In upper
levels the
unfamiliarity of the tools causes them to stumble.
Academies may not supply Meters or give away Auditor's Report
pads, work
sheets or ball points. If no Meter is available use a similarly
coloured and
shaped box with a dial painted on it and cards and cans attached and
urge the
student to get a Meter. The Academy furnishes card tables and chairs.
An Academy
must not use solid desks or solid tables in training as they are too
hard to
move about and too expensive.
347
ZERO VOCABULARY
The 13 word Vocabulary belongs in the Beginning Scientology
Course.
A Zero student is expected to learn all common Scientology words
in
current use up to the number of 200.
ZERO CERTIFICATE COURSE
A student is supposed to study evenings and week-ends during the
day-Zero
Certificate Course-and any day-Certificate Course. The evening student
is
supposed to study on week-ends during the Evening Certificate Course
and
evenings on the Week-End Certificate Course. Those not so studying
must be
reported to Ethics. Supervisors must assign what is to be studied off
course.
This is true of all Certificate Courses.
Classification Course students must frequent the Free
Scientology Centre
when not in class in those periods assigned to study in the
Certificate Course.
If not in action at the Free Scientology Centre, the student is
expected to -be
gathering his Auditor's Reports elsewhere for presentation to the
Examiner as
Examination is to occur at the exact end of the Classification Course
completed
check sheet, no matter when that occurs.
EXAMINATIONS
Zero Certificate Exams and all other Certificate Exams consist
of
verifying that the data was actually studied.
ZERO CLASSIFICATION
Exams are by written Exam and by inspection of the submitted
auditing
reports.
Where there is not yet a Department of Review, the student who
fails is
returned to Course. It will be found however that this is a very
catastrophic
procedure and a Review Cramming Section should be instituted as soon
as
possible. When it is there, an Examiner never returns the student to
Course but
sends to Review.
TWIN CHECKING
Twin Checking proceeds with the slight change that the twins are
not co-
auditors, but may assist each other by auditing if they wish but not
with
regular sessions on Course time.
Twins are for Theory Checking on the Certification Course and
for
Practical Drills on the Classification Course.
Until all check sheets and materials are to hand the D of T must
cope.
Additions to a check sheet may be written in on old check sheets but
not while
the student is on it, and only for the next student to be given it.
ZERO COURSE
The basic point of Zero today is Find the Auditor. "Look at me who am
I?"
"Who would I have to be to audit you?" is the type of process that
best defines the Level-Recognition.
LRH:mh.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note~ The 13 word Vocabulary referred to above can be found in Volume
2, Pages 95 & 96.]
348
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
LONDON
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JANUARY 1958
ACCs
HPA/HCA
An ACC is a special activity. It may modify HCA/HPA but not
necessarily.
What is good in an ACC is generally taught in HPA/HCA sometime.
HPA/HCA is a
tougher course by far and must prepare a student for all
eventualities. Thus
HCA/HPA must cover all types of processing and theory. Clearing a
student is
not the province of HCA/HPA. Teaching how to clear is the emphasis. If
they get
clear it's incidental. They're all auditors in HCA/HPA.
LRH
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 NOVEMBER 1958
ACC RECORDS
HCO now owns ACC records.
ACC files worldwide all go to London when fairly complete
locally.
HCO Board of Review completes ACC files, does all
correspondence, etc.
LRH:mp.rd L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 JANUARY 1959
(Issued at Washington)
(HCO PERSONNEL ONLY)
INSTRUCTORS OR HCO STAFF
PROCESSING PAST ACC STUDENTS
Instructors or HCO staff processing as preclears students who
have
appeared on an ACC course during the past two years, or forthcoming
two years,
for money are required to refund HCO 75% of all monies so received.
LRH:mp.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
349
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY-LETTER OF 23 FEBRUARY 1960
CenOCon
HCO Board of Review
ACC Personnel
ACC FILES
Immediately an ACC is completed, ACC files become the
responsibility of
the HCO Board of Review at the place where the ACC was conducted. The
procedure
for dealing with ACC files is as follows:-
Immediately at the end of the course, ACC Administrator turns
over ACC Log
and student's profiles to the local HCO Communicator, who forwards
them
immediately to ACC Conductor. When ACC Conductor has seen them they
are filed
permanently at HCO WW, Saint Hill. All other files and records are
handed to the
local HCO Board of Review.
A definite date by which DScn/HGS requirements must be met in
order to
qualify for the degree from that particular ACC should be set by the
ACC
Conductor Chief Instructor and HCO Board of Review. It is the
responsibility of
the Chief Instructor to see that a date is set and approved by the ACC
Conductor, and that the HCO Board of Review is informed.
The local HCO Board of Review holds all ACC student folders and
other ACC
papers necessary to his job, doing whatever communicating, testing,
correspondence, etc, that is necessary to the issuance of degrees and
qualifications from that ACC until the final date set is reached. At
this point,
he completes his records and forwards all the files, materials and
records from
that ACC to HCO WW at Saint Hill. He may still receive some
communications and
correspondence from time to time. If so, he handles it if possible, or
refers
the matter to HCO WW,.
Peter Hemery
HCO Secretary WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.vmm.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
350
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 FEBRUARY 1960
CenOCon
ACC HATS
The following hat write ups have been approved by LRH:
ACC Supervisor
PURPOSE: To ensure for HCO that the administration of an Advanced
Clinical
Course runs smoothly from beginning to end. That proper quarters are
-secured in
accordance with HCO Policy. That all required supplies and materials
are
acquired and on hand as scheduled.
----------
ACCs are L. Ron Hubbard's special courses, personally taught by
him,
scheduled by him and are sponsored for him by an HCO Office.
An HCO ACC Supervisor's primary duty is to see that adequate
quarters are
secured and that all needed materials and supplies are obtained.
HCO Sponsors an ACC, and Central Organization staff assist in
carrying out
the requirements for an ACC-i.e., the Organization Secretary is
furnished a copy
of the Master List of requirements for an ACC; he normally secures a
proper
building, has it thoroughly checked over per requirements, sees that
Material
Department acquires and places proper supplies and materials in the
ACC
building, and that everything is on hand before an ACC begins. (A copy
of the
Master List is furnished Material also.) -
ACC Supervisor maintains a checklist to ensure that everything
required gets done. Sample Checklist:
1. ACC building obtained __________
2. Mailings sent announcing ACC __________
3. Announced in Org Magazine
4. All ACC posts filled _________
5. ACC hat folders given ACC personnel by HCO Sec __________
6. All ACC personnel checked out on their hats by HCO Sec
__________
7. All items on Master List completed
8. All mimeoing completed by HCO & delivered _______
9. (Other as needed.) -
ACC Supervisor keeps LRH posted on status of affairs-e.g.,
readiness of
building, number of ACC applications on hand, number expected, number
paid, etc,
and any other data as he may request.
(Note: "Master List of Materials Required for an ACC" will be
found in an
ACC Supervisor's hat folder.) -
----------
ACC Chief Instructor's Hat
PURPOSE: To turn out auditors who are responsible for clearing their
pcs and
who know and can use the best methods of doing so. To make an ACC the
greatest
real education on this planet. -
ORDERS: Directly under ACC Conductor. It is an HCO post.
POST: During ACCs, ACC Classroom, secondarily, ACC Instructor's
office. Between
ACCs at home address or as otherwise arranged with HCO WW.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Trains students.
2. Sees that data communicated to students is real, clear, and is
understood
and can be supplied by them as their own.
3. Sees to it that results of course are such that ACCs have a
growing and
continuing reputation of excellence among Scientologists and
public.
351
4. Sees that stable data and instructions of ACC Conductor are
carried out and
observed.
5. Keeps ACC Conductor informed.
6. Sees that ACC Administrator functions.
7. Determines conduct and teaching procedure of ACC Instructors.
Arranges for
lectures by Instructors.
8. Stays in 2-way comm with ACC Instructors, personnel, students and
course
Conductor.
9. Arranges course scheduling in consultation with ACC Conductor.
Builds
schedule around ACC Conductor's lectures.
10. Sees that course comm-lines with HCO WW and local HCO/HASI are
kept free and
open. Establishes lines as necessary.
11. May be required to take charge of pilot, experimental, or model
courses
other than ACCs as specified by LRH at HCS/BScn or HCA/HPA or
other levels.
12. Is answerable for anything that happens or doesn't happen on
course.
13. Is answerable for the quality of auditing demonstrated by former
students
after their departure from course.
----------
ACC Instructor Hat
PURPOSE: To train the best auditors on earth.
Works directly under ACC Chief Instructor, who is under ACC
Conductor.
POST: ACC Classroom; secondarily, ACC Instructor's office.
DUTIES:
1. Makes auditors.
2. Owns and puts into effect instructions from ACC Chief and ACC
Conductor.
3. Runs tight 8C with understandable ARC on students; includes
keeping their
hats straight.
4. Keeps alert for ways and means of improving training.
5. Is fully responsible for students' degree of auditing skill, or
lack of it,
for their behavior as students, and for their beingness as
preclears.
6. Is responsible not only for putting out clear, correct data and
instructions, but for getting it owned, understood and used by
students.
7. Teaches pilot courses at HCA/HPA or HCS/BScn level as required by
HCO.
8. Keeps Chief Instructor informed about any unusual procedures or
instructions. If very non-routine, checks with Chief before
employing them.
9. Maintains 2-way comm with ACC Conductor, Chief Instructor, other
instructors, Administrator, Clerk and students.
----------
ACC Clerk Hat
PURPOSE: To create an orderly ACC by performing efficiently the
routine work of
ACC Administration.
The ACC Clerk works directly under the ACC administrator, who is
under the
ACC Chief Instructor, who is under the ACC Conductor. It is an HCO
post.
POST: The ACC Instructor's office for paper work, filing, etc, the
ACC
Classroom for picking up auditors' reports and infraction sheets,
distributing
students' mail, delivering messages to instructors, etc; the door to
the ACC
lecture room during LRH lectures, to handle any bodies coming-or
going. (He/She
is entitled to hear LRH's lectures.)
Note: The ACC Clerk will be instructed in any unfamiliar duties by
the ACC
Administrator.
REGULAR DUTIES:
1. Answering phone and taking messages.
2. Handling visitors.
3. Handling course paper work-includes collecting, checking, filing
auditors'
reports, Infraction sheets, homework, etc. Routine issuance of
infraction
theses.
4. Keeping ACC supplies in order, and notifying ACC Administrator
when anything
needful to course is running out.
5. Course typing and stencil cutting.
6. Pick up and delivery of mail and messages between local HCO/HASI
and the
ACC.
352
7. Assists at Registration of students.
8. Prepares ACC roll book.
9. Administers and scores APA/OCAs and IQ to late-entering students.
(The
course before-and-after tests are normally scored by the
students.)
10. Grading any written tests that may be given during the course.
11. Seeing that coffee or tea is ready for instructors at certain
breaks.
12. Referring students to Instructors if they ask questions about
Scientology
data; referring them to their auditor, if they start asking about
their
cases.
The ACC Clerk is required throughout the final Saturday of the course.
ACC Schedules
PURPOSE: To set a time for Congresses & ACCs.
POST: Wherever found, or do HCO WW. -
DUTIES:
1. To establish starting and ending dates for Congresses and ACCs and
to obtain
agreement on these between LRH and all other interested parties.
2. To make sure these dates are known to all concerned.
----------
ACC Administrator Hat
PURPOSE: To ensure a smooth-running ACC as regards material.
Works under ACC Chief Instructor and ACC Conductor. Supervises
ACC Clerk.
POST: ACC Instructor's Office.
DUTIES
1. To furnish ACC Supervisor, wherever an ACC is given, with a- list
of
material needed for ACC and to make certain that these are on hand
in the
quantities needed and at the time required.
2. To keep the ACC Master List (of such materials) up to date and
adapted to
the current course.
3. To predict what will be needed, where and when, for an ACC, and
make sure it
arrives.
4. Stays in comm with ACC Chief Instructor and ACC Conductor so that
material
requirements are known and fulfilled on schedule.
5. Keeps ACC Log.
6. Instructs ACC Clerk and makes certain his/her work is being done
in an
orderly way. (See ACC Clerk's Hat for duties,)
7. Is responsible for all ACC Material during course, and for turning
over ACC
Files to local HCO Board of Review (for eventual shipment to St
Hill), at
course conclusion.
8. Carries on person to ACCs:
(a) Logs of prior ACCs.
(b) Copies of standard ACC issue mimeoed (roneoed) material.
(c) Standard issue booklets.
(d) Copy of ACC Master List and spare copies of ACC personnel
hats.
9. Keeps memoranda and exchanges dispatches concerning ACC as
required by Chief
Instructor.
10. Obtains ACC material direct from local HCO or HASI Material
Administrator,
with whatever amount of 8C and ARC is effective. The correct line
is through
ACC Supervisor to HASI Material Administrator with direct liaison
between
ACC Administrator and HAS! Material Administrator. Should this
line break
down, be effective.
11. At end of course, hands ACC log and student profiles to HCO
Communicator to
send to LRH (and then direct to ACC file to HCO WW). Hands all
other ACC
files to local HCO Board of Review.
Peter Hemery
HCO Secretary WW
LRH:js.bp.rd for
Copyright ($) 1960 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
353
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MARCH 1960
(Reissued from Sthil)
CenOCon
HAT ADDITION
ACC SUPERVISOR HAT
The following hat addition to the ACC Supervisor hat is approved:
The ACC Supervisor is responsible for seeing that two "stand-by"
students
are provided for the ACC, in case an odd number of students appears
for the
course, or in case the number of students becomes odd at some point.
The most likely prospects for "stand-by" students are those who
are
qualified for the course and waiting to take it, but are unable to pay
for it.
They attend all the lectures and hold themselves in readiness to fill
in at a
moment's notice. Unless they eventually pay for the course, they do
not get the
complete course.
The Association Secretary (Org Sec) is usually the person best
qualified
to know What people are available and suitable to act as "stand-by"
students.
LRH:js.mm.rd Peter Hemery
Copyright ($) 1960 HCO Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 MAY 1960
CenOCon
ACCEPTANCE FOR ACC AND ACADEMY COURSES
It is now Policy that no students be accepted for an ACC or any
other
training course conducted by a Scientology Organization who have a
chronic
bodily condition for which they are under medical care and/or taking
drugs.
These students should be encouraged to take an Intensive at HGC
until
their condition is resolved and they are off drugs.
The reason for this ruling is that, for example, on a recent
ACC, the only
two blow-offs have been (1) a student who was on 30 grains a night of
Sodium
Bromide, Chloral Hydrate and gentian and who sometimes took as much as
90 grains
and (2) another student under drugs from her physician for a dropsical
condition. This student was given only five months to live, five years
ago, and
was taking the ACC on her own risk.
Cases such as the above need intensive auditing before
attempting a course
such as an ACC. A smoother gradient is indicated, and this could be
done by
getting the condition resolved through auditing first, before allowing
the
student on to the course.
LRH:js.rd Rosamond Harper
Copyright ($) 1960 HCO Technical
Secretary WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
354
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 DECEMBER 1960
Franchise Hldrs
Central Orgs
ACC Instructors
Australia: Mail to all Australian Auditors
London: Mail to all UK Auditors
CURRICULUM FOR ACCs
January 1961
Dick and Jan Halpern are giving the majority of the US ACC
starting after
the Congress in January, 1961. I am giving the 1st week of this
course.
Mary Sue Hubbard and Peter Williams will assist me on the 2nd
South
African ACC starting on January 23, 1961 in Johannesburg, after a
Congress on
21st and 22nd January. Peter (Association Secretary, Australia) is
flying in
from Melbourne for this purpose and to study the Johannesburg test
lines. On his
return to Australia Peter will teach an Australian ACC based on the
Johannesburg
ACC.
These ACCs will specialise in the following processes and data
and all
students will run on them.
Presessions 1 to 37. All variations.
Formulas 15, 13, 14 and 16.
Regimen 3 using all the data contained in presessions 2 to 36.
S-C-S and Connectedness will be used on all persons who had a
hard run on
the Formulas after these are flat and before sessions are run on
Regimen 3.
Assessment will be taught heavily to locate proper terminals for
help
before Regimen 3 is scheduled.
Model Session and precise auditing will be stressed.
I can guarantee that all cases will be stably started, some for
the first
time, due to our experience on the 1st Saint Hill and my research, and
the
application of Mary Sue as D of P, and the staff auditors of
Johannesburg who
for the first time in South Africa are moving all cases in the HGC.
Tapes will be made of all my lectures. The South African tapes
will be
professionally recorded. The US tapes will be done on an Ampex. All
copying will
be done in Washington on Ampex pro machines.
We have had a great technical win, first on the 1st Saint Hill
and now on
field and off-the-street pcs in South Africa (the roughest cases in
the world
according to our data). -
Most of this data has been released. The technology of its use
has not
been entirely released and there is much to know aside from the bare
data.
There will be an early summer ACC in England taught at Saint
Hill by Dick,
Jan and myself. -
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:des.js.rd
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
355
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1961
All HGCs
All Academies
CURRICULUM FOR CLEARING COURSES
(Note: LA and Melbourne are to begin Special Clearing Courses at
the end
of this month. This gives data to be stressed.)
(This data may be used in HGCs.)
In the last DC and Melbourne courses, goals assessments were
reported to
be taking so long that very few goals were found in Melbourne and none
in the DC
course.
This condition also existed elsewhere and on my very careful
research, in
all cases where goals assessment exceeded 150 goals, the actual goal
was to be
found in the first 150 goals given by the pc. Out rudiments had buried
it. As
soon as rudiments were put in, the goal reappeared, the terminal was
found and
all went off routinely.
On all long, arduous runs on the goals terminal rudiments were
out, a
chronic PTP or heavy withhold had stopped clearing.
Plainly, auditors are in a games condition on goals and prevent
the pc
from having one or attaining one. This and unreality on track is the
probable
source of all long or bad auditing.
The general remedy for this is to flatten Routine 1A on all
auditors,
flatten the games condition process where the auditor won't let the pc
win and
get every auditor to have a reality on own track.
Several cases have been found stalled on "treatment", the pc
being wildly
allergic to any and all "treatment" and thus taking forever to run.
All bad auditing is done by auditors who have no reality on the
track,
and the then-ness of pictures. These are seeking to escape and thus
pull the pc
into escaping, whereas clearing lies in confronting. Auditors whose
pictures
flick in and out and who never linger are "out of valence" on the
track or are
otherwise seeking to escape. The remedy is to make such, as pcs, run
pictures
with unknown when found, not escape from them. Several lectures cover
this.
Q and A with the pc is entirely taking what the pc suggests or
taking
orders from the pc. One order taken from the pc by the auditor and
bang, ARC
breaks. This is the source of ARC breaks.
----------
All this and more is covered in the Saint Hill lectures of the
last half
of August and early September.
The exact lectures are being listed and examinations prepared
for them.
This list and the examinations will be sent for these two courses.
It is suggested that the students get at least two of these
lectures per
day.
To make your students into auditors, skip the TRs in these
advanced
courses, relegating TRs to the Academy and Saint Hill. Instead, start
the course
cases as follows:
Find if the pc has ever been "in himself" or herself in a
picture. Unbury
and run that picture with Unknown with this command:
"What was unknown about that incident?" Keep the pc in the
incident.
356
If the pc has never had a picture 3D in his own valence, run
either or
both of the following:
"What was unknown?" and another process,
"What unknown should you escape from?" "What unknown should you
attack?"
"What unknown should another escape from?" "What unknown should
another
attack?"
These last two processes also handle problems, treatment and the
other
factors mentioned above and class as 1A processes.
Omit Routine 2 out of all instruction.
Rewrite your Pre-Hav Primary Scale to include all emotions from
"serenity"
to "hide". Include on the scale in the place of "No Motion", PROBLEMS.
Include
also UNKNOWN, FORGET, NOT KNOW. Add also DISLOCATE. Omit anything that
is a
brother to "No Motion". Include DENY.
----------
Get assessment going only when 1A is flat. IA can- be considered
flat when
Escape-Attack on Unknown produces no TA motion after this or other IA
processes
have been run.
----------
Get ordinary security checking going at once on HCO WW Sec Form
6. When
students do this well, shift to the Not Know version of Security
Checking on
Form 3. Do the last two pages of Form 3 before the rest.
----------
In all auditing done on course (or in HGCs) get daily cross-
checks on
rudiments. Let a student (or in HGCs another auditor) check (but not
run) the
rudiments on every pc and point out to the pc's auditor those that are
OUT.
----------
Let students sec check each other evenings, independent of days
auditing,
but make sure they know how it is done. Don't let them assess
evenings. Do all
assessment in class auditing time.
----------
Stamp ruthlessly on Q and A (auditor doing whatever the pc
says).
----------
Arrange two 2Y2 hour auditing periods a day.
----------
Instructors check out any goal and any terminal found before
letting it be
run.
----------
A course completion depends on a student:
1. Doing a good Not Know version of Security Checking.
2. Finding the goal and terminal of a pc.
3. Doing a proper Pre-Hav Assessment.
4. Having Form 3 and a Form 6 Sec Check completed on self.
5. Passing a perfect exam on the book E-Meter Essentials plus Instant
and
Latent Read.
6. Getting a decent graph change on his pc or clearing.
Any student clearing his pc on either course will instantly be
awarded a D.Scn. Clear status must be checked out by HCO.
------------
Routine 1A consists of flattening problems (or unknowns) on the
TA and
completing a Not Know Sec Check, HCO WW Form 3.
Routine 3 consists of' finding the goals and terminals of the
pcs and
doing any available Sec Checks.
These two routines are the only routines to be used or taught on
Special
Courses at this time.
357
The processes to be used to clear rudiments are as follows
(supposing the
difficulty has been finally stated by PC):
ROOM: TR 10 or pc's havingness process, run only until question
about room
produces no needle reaction.
AUDITOR: What would you be willing to be? What would you rather
not be?
(Run TA motion out.)
PT PROBLEM: (When pc has stated it and who) What is unknown
about that
problem with __________? (Run until needle no longer reacts on
terminal, check
any other PTP and run it as necessary.)
WITHHOLDS: To whom wasn't that known? To whom shouldn't that be
known?
(Run until needle no longer reacts.)
ARC BREAK: What didn't an auditor do? When? What weren't you
able to tell
an auditor? When?
Alter Model Session Script to include the above.
-----------
Limit two-way comm to asking what, where, when questions.
----------
SUMMARY
Spend no course time trying to make auditors. Criticise
blunders. But give
no long lectures of any kind to the class. Just tell them what to do
individually, exactly as above, and see that it gets done on an
individual
basis.
In instructing, confront each student, one at a time. Don't
worry about
general confronts of the class, not even a seminar period.
Tell the student to do so and so as above with his pc. Show him
or her how
to do it. Skip all extra ordinary solutions. Just use the above. Get a
maximum
of solid auditing done.
Spread your teams as far apart as possible.
Dispense with check sheet examination except on Saint Hill
tapes.
Make auditors by making them audit, if they goof, assume they
have no
reality on the track and get the student to confront his bank as
above.
Subjective reality alone can make an auditor. Routines IA and 3 alone
can make
clears.
All auditor goofs stem from unreality. Reality is found
a. By auditing and
b. By familiarity with own bank and track.
If an auditor on your course has already received HPA/HCA and
any further training and still has no hang of it, you won't educate them to
victory. They just don't have reality on the mind yet. See that they get it
subjectively. And so teach them to make clears.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jl.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L~ Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
358
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 DECEMBER 1961
Assoc Secs
HCO Cont Secs
CLEARING COURSES
I will not approve any clearing courses anywhere in the world
until there
are a majority of Class II auditors in Orgs and field.
Teach Class II special courses. Advertise them as special as you
want.
All clearing courses fail where no Class II auditors exist.
LRH:ph.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 SEPTEMBER 1969
Remimeo
BPI
Auditor
OLD ACC STUDENTS
Any and all persons who have ever enrolled in an ACC (Advanced
Clinical
Course) providing only that a fee was paid in full, is entitled to the
following:
1. Full training as an HDG in the DAC of his nearest org or an SH or
an AO.
2. Student Auditing in Dianetics and org reviews to resolve any
possible case
difficulties.
3. Assistance in obtaining any medical treatment indicated as
necessary by
competent medical examination.
4. A retread to Class VI in a modern SH Course.
No fees, except for any medical treatment indicated, may be
charged for
any of the services above.
All orgs, AOs and SHes are ordered to deliver the above
services.
The Public Executive Secretary is to cause his division to
unearth all
past ACC records for names and addresses and to have his divisions
send copies
of this Policy Letter to all such former ACC students.
Those ACC students who have recently paid for the new Standard
Dianetic
Course may have the amount credited to AO levels or AO reviews on
presentation
of invoice to AOs.
It is the full intention of this Pol Ltr to ensure that old ACC
students
receive full benefit of modern technical developments. These students
were once
promised they would not have to pay for further training and this
favour is
offered to redeem that promise at least in part if not in full. I want
them to
be well and happy beings wherever they may not have fully achieved
that goal.
LRH:ldm.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
359
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 NOVEMBER 1963
General
Release
BPI
MA
CERTIFICATE AND CLASSIFICATION CHANGES
EVERYONE CLASSIFIED
(Subject to last paragraph this Policy Letter
changes all earlier Certificate Classification
HCO Policy Letters, as of February 15, 1964.)
Acceptance, requested change or objection to this plan should be
airmailed
to me at Saint Hill so that any necessary amendments can be issued
before the
effective date. If objections are minimal and acceptance general, this
plan goes
into full effect February 15, 1964, without further announcement and
will remain
the stable gauge of all training, processing, certifying and
classification in
the future. It is only possible to formulate this now that technology
to OT is
complete.
----------
Signalizing the discovery and refinement of all levels of
processing up to
and including the highest targets set in Scientology research, the
following
classification schedule has been developed.
It is evident that 13 years of research developed many processes
and
styles of auditing and that these are all useful and necessary to the
successful
progress of cases.
To open the road to everyone, it is necessary to have a
precisely mapped
course of progress. Experience shows that preclears entering too high
into
processes without adequate processing and training background at lower
levels
will fail.
Technical data now makes it evident that a person not trained to
run high
level OT processes cannot receive successful case improvement on them
and that
it is dangerous to run an uneducated pc at high levels. This alone
makes
classification of preclears as well as auditors necessary. Even at
lower levels
it will be found that preclears, lacking training, do not advance
well.
Further it is economical to co-audit to higher levels.
Therefore, without disturbing private or HGC processing
commitments and
yet placing these as well into these classifications for the
protection of the
preclear and auditor alike, the following rules are adopted and have
the full
force of policy. Effective February 15, 1964, auditors and preclears
violating
these policies will be subject to Committees of Evidence.
1. NO PRECLEAR MAY BE AUDITED ABOVE HIS OR HER CLASS.
2. NO AUDITOR MAY USE PROCESSES ON ANYONE ABOVE HIS OR HER
CLASS.
3. A PRECLEAR MAY BE PROCESSED WITH- THE PROCESSES OF HIS OR
HER CLASS OR WITH THE PROCESSES OF ANY LESSER CLASS.
4. AN AUDITOR MAY USE THE PROCESSES OF HIS OR HER CLASS OR
ANY LESSER CLASS, BUT MAY NOT USE ON ANY PARTICULAR
PRECLEAR ANY PROCESS ABOVE THAT PRECLEAR'S CLASS
REGARDLESS OF THE AUDITOR'S CLASSIFICATION.
Any HUBBARD CERTIFIED AUDITOR or HUBBARD PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR
who holds
the actual certificate may train any person to the level of HUBBARD
APPRENTICE
SCIENTOLOGIST and may further train to Class I and by application to
the nearest
Central Organization may have the person he has trained
360
certified or classified, for which application forms and certificates
will be
furnished by Central Organizations.
A full Classification Chart will be published from time to time
giving the
requirements and processes of every level and concise text books and
answer
sheets are in preparation for every class. But absence of texts shall
not
preclude training or classifying so long as the materials are
communicated, at
least until such time as texts are complete and available.
It readily will be seen that stress is being placed on co-audit
at every
class level. While no objection will be made to private pcs or HGC
pcs, the
above rules apply as to what the pc may be run on and a pc who fails
to study
for and attain his next classification levels will not be able to be
processed
at higher levels. Technical surveys demand these measures for the
safety of
preclears. Furthermore, training is far cheaper than processing in the
long run.
It will be found that auditing skill varies even within a class.
It is
true that an auditor receives no better processing than he gives if
only for the
reason that no one wants to co-audit with him or her when the skill is
low.
Therefore there is an incentive to be a very good auditor if only to
receive
good processing at any class level.
These measures are dictated by a desire to have everyone make it
and to
leave a precisely marked roadway from the lowest to highest levels.
It will also be found that auditors disseminate and purely
preclears
seldom do.
A great many recent instances are to hand which not only
demonstrate the
impossibility of attaining the highest levels without training but
also
demonstrate the way cases are barred out at the lower levels through
lack of
training and Orderly forward programming up through the levels. The
only case
barriers now are failures to have experienced certain processes at
lower levels
which reduced the confusion of the environment, hidden standards, etc.
For
instance you cannot pull missed withholds on a preclear who has no
concept of
communication much less the definition of missed withholds.
Unless we take this step and adopt classification for preclears
as well as
auditors, we will find ourselves continuously losing people off the
road and
halting our forward advance.
The general Classification Chart Issue One is as follows:
Class Process Types Certificate
0 Listen Style HAS
I Listen Style, HAS Classed
Assists
R-1-C
Principles of ARC, Dynamics
II Repetitive Processes, HCA
CCHs, Straight Wire,
Tone 40 and Formal Auditing
Axioms O/W
III Prepchecking, Metered Processes, HPA
Assessing
Old "R2" and "R2H"
IV Service Facsimiles, HCS
ARC Break Assessments,
Programming,
Missed W/Hs
V Implants, Engrams, Whole Track, HAA
Whole Track Case Analysis
VI OT Processes HSS
Own GPMs
Old R3 and R4 Processes
VII Old Route One and Other HGA
Drills
361
The certificate schedule HCO Policy Letter of August 12, 1963,
is
cancelled. The certificate Hubbard Book Auditor is withdrawn. The
certificates
Hubbard Apprentice Scientologist, Hubbard Clearing Scientologist and
Hubbard
Advanced Auditor are reinstated. HCA and HPA are both given
international
standing but now are different classes.
The rules of processing apply to CLASS not to certificate. A
certificate
may have almost any lower class stamped on it. It is the
classification not the
certificate that permits use of processes or being run on processes.
While under actual training for the next class a preclear may be
run on
those processes. But to be under training for the next class one must
have been
classified for the immediately preceding class. One cannot enter
training for
the next class, regardless of the certificate held, unless classed for
the
earlier class.
Each class has its theory, practical and auditing section. Each
process
has its Basic Auditing, Technique and Case analysis for that class.
It is envisioned that training courses be brief and precise and
require
exact levels of attainment as to theory, practical and auditing
requirements.
Every effort is being made to handily assemble this data for each
class,
although all of it already exists in various forms such as books,
bulletins and
tapes.
A more expansive Classification Chart is nearing completion.
Stress in any course is 50% on auditing, 50% on case gain. It is
not
expected that a person will be allowed into the next class until the
processes
of the previous class have been flattened on him or her.
----------
Maximal attention will be paid in the enforcement of this policy
to
circumstances surrounding persons who have long been in Dianetics and
Scientology. For these a special class is being created saluting their
long
presence in Dianetics and Scientology and permitting the use of
processing as
auditors and preclears up to a reasonable class level in keeping with
their
experience, successes and case advance, the only proviso being that
actual case
advance has been obtained and that their cases are not impeded by
having failed
to benefit from a certain lower level.
Classification changes and upgrades will not, however, be
attempted above
the Class IV of the above chart and any Class IV now awarded may be
upgraded in
special cases only to Class V. No classification for Class VI is now
obtainable
except by training and no actual GPMs may be run by any auditor until
the full
technology is released and re-classification is earned. This is due to
the
numerous upsets at this level (VI).
Classes V, VI and VII may only be awarded at Saint Bill. Classes
0 to IV
inclusive may be awarded by Central Organizations. Classes 0 to I may
be awarded
by HCAs or above by application for, not of rights to award, but for
certificate
and class to HCOs of Central Organizations. The right to award HAS and
Classes 0
and I are inherent in holding a valid HCA or HPA certificate.
Note: If any pre-1960 auditor feels confused about his class, he
or she
need only honestly answer the question, "What processes do I do very
successfully and get good results with and do I succeed on myself as a
case?"
and that will serve as a good gauge of what -class that auditor should
have in
order to go forward on the charted course to OT with maximum gain and
minimal
upset.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Amended by HCO P/L 11 December 1963, Classification for Everyone,
page 364.1
362
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 DECEMBER 1963
HCO Secs
Assoc Secs
URGENT
ORG PROGRAMMING
HCO Pol Ltr of 26th November 1963 and the tape of 3 December
1963 outline
a new departure and if handled well prosperity for Central Orgs.
The remaining two tapes of this week, that of 4 December 1963
and 5
December 1963 are illuminative of technical.
The Association or Organization Secretary should play these
three tapes
and take up the P01 Ltr of 26 November 1963 with all staff, using more
than one
period, and discuss and examine these points until certain they are
understood.
Doing this should give the necessary promotional and technical
data and
programming necessary to carry organizations forward with higher
impetus.
It is possible that course costs will be changed. Any
suggestions for this
will be appreciated. -
Reports of the conduct and results of the staff meetings above
should be
reported to me directly.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
363
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 DECEMBER 1963
CenOCon
General Release
URGENT
CLASSIFICATION FOR EVERYONE
(Amends HCO P01 Ltr of Nov. 26, 1963)
HCO Policy Letter of November 26, 1963 should be corrected and
amended
before magazine or general release where this is possible.
HCA is restored to Level III in the table and HCA is ranked as
the U.S.
version of Commonwealth HPA. HCA/HPA is the Certificate at Level III.
At Level II HCA is replaced by "Hubbard Qualified Scientologist"
initials
HQS. Mark it so in table.
Change the rights to train to HAS and to give Class I to "All
auditors
including and above Hubbard Qualified Scientologist".
The Academy course envisioned for the HQS is the old one month
Comm Course
Upper Indoc HCA/HPA course. Both Comm Course and Upper Indoc are
however taught
in one week. At the end of this course the student will be given his
or her
certificate. At the end of this course however, the student is not
given Class
II. The student is now qualified to train to HAS and Class I and to
use and be
audited on Class II materials since he or she is in training for Class
II. When
the student feels ready, he or she may take their Classification
examination for
Class II. No additional training may be sold this student by an
Academy until
the student is Class II, and no additional Class H course may be given
this
student.
The cost of the original HQS course is envisioned as �35. It may
not be
priced above this figure anywhere. The cost of an HAS course is
envisioned as
not more than �5 where it is charged for and the Class I course for
HAS Class I
is envisioned as an additional course costing no more than �10. Any
auditor from
HQS up may teach and charge for HAS courses and HAS Class I courses.
There is no
restriction on auditing fees charged by auditors or HGCs. Charges for
co-audit
unit attendance are - at discretion.
In short it is envisioned that a person may receive his HAS from
any
auditor HQS or above, or from any Scientology Organization, and
similarly may
receive his HAS Class I. These HAS and HAS Class I courses are
envisioned as
evening or weekend courses. The only restriction is that failure to
train well
before awarding can result in a Committee of Evidence for the trainer.
Any HAS Class I may take his or her HQS course at any Academy,
will be
certified on completion and will be given Classification Examination
for Class
II at a future date without further formal training.
It is necessary to have been classed as Class II before being
permitted to
take an HCA/HPA course at Level HI.
Academies will teach the HCA/HPA course with Level III
materials. The
course is envisioned as 2 months in length and its cost about �78.
Classification arrangement is similar to HCA/HPA.
It is not envisioned that people taking HAS or HQS or even
HCA/HPA courses
are making a career out of Scientology. They are expected to keep on
working at
their
364
jobs. This must be stressed. There is no effort to follow medical-
psychiatric
practitioner patterns and have offices. There is an - effort to work
evening and
weekends running small organizations of co-audits. The effort is to
make
Scientologists, not have "patients". This dictates the length of the
HQS course
as people can seldom get off work for more than a month.
This does not interfere, however, with someone working full time
in
Scientology.
Cost and length of courses rise somewhat as they increase in
Class as the
increased ability of the student, if well processed. on classification
level
processes, commonly brings him or her more income and leisure.
The intent of this programme is to (1) Open the road for
everyone (2)
Provide wider dissemination (3) Guarantee an increase of knowledge to
keep pace
with increase of ability (4) Provide the cheapest possible processing
(5)
Regulate processes by Class Level to guarantee a more real advance (6)
Steer
around rough spots found in the past in technical, administrative and
personal
areas.
There is no effort to decrease the income or present activity of
any
auditor or organization but only to widen the sphere of action.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard -
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1964
Central Orgs
BPI
CLASSIFICATION
There has been a very wide response to my request for your
opinions and
suggestions on the HCO Policy Letter of November 26, 1963, Certificate
and
Classification Changes. -
I am glad to say that the basic principle of classification of
auditors
and preclears has been almost universally accepted, and mostly with
enthusiasm.
The scheme will therefore go into operation as outlined.
Some objections have been made on the grounds that certain
auditors, or
certain preclears, might be prevented from progressing further in
Scientology.
Such individual problems can be ironed out. The purpose of the policy
is to
enable everyone to progress through the levels in an orderly fashion
and to
ensure that many more individuals have the opportunity to reach OT. -
-
I hope that most of your immediate objections will be removed by
HCO
Policy Letter of February 5, 1964, Founding Scientologist Certificate.
This
implements the "Old Timers Clause" which appeared in the original
Policy Letter.
By sending in your application you will have the right to processing
(or
auditing if you are qualified) up to Class IV.
Thank you for your help in the past. You can help in the future,
too.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
365
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE,
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 FEBRUARY 1964
Central Orgs
Franchise
Field
CLASSIFICATION
The final shape of Classification Policy, now that opinions are
in, some
of them belated, is as follows:
Auditors will be Classified from I to VI as in the original
issue.
In response to numerous field requests, the original issue is
changed as
follows:
Preclears will be separately Classified, Levels I to VI.
Classification
will be on the basis of processes flattened. Each level will have
certain basic
processes to be accomplished. Preclear Classification will not be by
certificate
but by a specific log book issued to the preclear and signed by his
auditor as
each process is flattened and a level completed. Technology now
permits this to
be effective and it will prevent case failures.
The same log book will be issued to auditors and they too must
attain
their own preclear level to compare with certificate. Certificates and
current
classes to be valid until 1 July 1965.
Classification of auditors and preclears effective date is
extended to 15
April 1965. The processing log books will be issued before that date.
The log book also applies to Co-Audits.
Founding Scientologists' Certificate issues are going forward,
allowing up
to Class IV for trained auditors and Class IV for preclears. The
actual
Certificate must be possessed by the individual to be in effect. Fact
of having
been a Scientologist or Dianeticist for years gives no dispensation
unless the
Founding Scientology Certificate is in hand.
HGCs and Saint Hill trained auditors may issue special
dispensation to HGC
preclears and their own personal preclears to temporarily raise their
preclear
class during certain phases of processing.
Effective 1 June 1968 field centres duly established with Saint
Hill
Graduates may train to levels as high as IV and are permitted
effective 15 April
1964 to train to HAS Class I and HQS Class II. On 1 June 1968 Central
Orgs will
be permitted to train to Classes V & VI, which until that date will
only be
taught at Saint Hill.
Otherwise the basic policy letter is unchanged. A summary issue
will be
prepared and released.
This policy has been formulated with the consultation and
majority
agreement of organizations and field auditors all over the world and
is final.
The effective date is now 15 April 1965.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard [Note: Policy on Founding Scientologist
Certificates is
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED given in Volume 2, pages
264.265.]
366
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 FEBRUARY 1964
All Orgs
URGENT
ORG PROGRAMMING
With the change to the Classification Policy there are various
possible
danger points to Org volume. -
Before the public understands Classification they may feel the
HGC has
gone out of business or various other ideas may get afloat.
At once all comm lines must be utilized to emphasize that
Classification
means better case gains in the HGC as well as in the field. One gets
processed
out of a level by the HGC or field auditors as well as trained up from
it. The
HGC is there to get people's processing at the lower levels caught up
in the
quickest possible period of time. It can be done best at an HGC which
can issue
a processing clearance of lower levels and speed the person to higher
classification levels.
The Continental Mag should be issued to stress this at once.
HQS as a course should be boomed.
HAS should be stressed for the newcomer.
Get bodies moving through the shop fast. Publicize the HGC well.
Technically in the HGC stress to auditors processes that take
care of In-
Sessionness. What isn't the pc able to do to be completely auditable?
Permit
questions to be asked by the auditor? Accept the environment? Etc.
Assess by
session parts and use processes to remedy these things. Stress basic
type
repetitive processes and grant a right to be run on them to HGC pcs,
to handle
Level I, and clean up all Level H pc requirements. Get these flat on
the pc. And
you'll have wins, wins, wins.
Inform the public of the new Case Supervisor and set him or her
on duty.
I designed classification to get maximum case gains for the pc
and prevent
pcs being given loses. Stress that in HGC propaganda.
GPMs
Issue publicly pcs do have their own goals and GPMs. The best
way to get
them run is to get graduated up through the levels.
The Invalidation of the idea that a pc had his own goals was a
severe
blow. Invalidation of a pc's own GPMs, calling them implants, produces
an
instant ARC Break and physical repercussions.
So correct this quick on Broad Public Interest (BPI), regardless
of
classification.
SOLVE IT WITH SCIENTOLOGY
If the Org slumps during this transition period, don't engage in
"fund
raising" or "selling postcards" or borrowing money.
367
Just make more income with Scientology.
It's a sign of very poor management to seek extraordinary
solutions for
finance outside Scientology. It has always failed.
For Orgs as for pcs "Solve It With Scientology".
Every time I myself have sought to solve finance or personnel in
other
ways than Scientology I have lost out. So I can tell you from
experience that
Org solvency lies in More Scientology, not patented combs or fund
raising
Barbecues.
FUTURE
This Policy Letter though urgent should be no cause for alarm.
Orgs are
not going broke. They are however in a transition period to huge
volume of
action and it is costly to bridge.
These immediate steps will prevent any slump, if swiftly taken.
So take them.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
368
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 APRIL 1964
Central Orgs
Franchise
SUMMARY OF POLICIES
ON CLASSIFICATION AND GRADATION, CERTIFICATION,
FRANCHISE AND MEMBERSHIPS, AND THE
AUDITORS DIVISION
This Policy Letter is a general summary of all current policies
regarding:
1. Classification and Gradation
2. Certification
3. Franchise and Memberships
4. The Auditors Division of Saint Hill
Certain parts of these policies have only just been formulated
(such as
Gradation) and will be more fully described in later issues. However,
all the
above affect each other, and this summary will show how they all
dovetail into
each other, providing a basis for an orderly, progressive framework
for
Scientology in its expansion all over the world.
All these policies have only one basic purpose in mind-to enable
all to
follow a clearly marked road to freedom and OT. Three distinct routes
are
provided, one of which should suit the capabilities of any individual.
These
three routes are described in greater detail below.
1. CLASSIFICATION AND GRADATION
The general outline of classification is now well enough known,
and, with
various modifications, has been generally accepted by all as a logical
system of
orderly progress in the knowledge and application of Scientology.
There are now three ways to progress along the road:
1. The Preclear
2. The Co-Auditor
3. The Auditor (i.e. the Professional Auditor).
Definitions:
1. The Preclear has achieved the gains, knows the why and parts of
the
processes and the underlying basics. No auditor performance or
ability
required.
2. The Co-Auditor is trained, can perform the process under
supervision and has
passed a non-professional examination on it.
3. The Auditor is professionally qualified in all respects in theory,
practical
and auditing at his particular level.
Scientology is categorized into various Levels, numbered at
present from 0
to VII-i.e. from the completely untutored public to OT (higher levels
may be
added later). Anybody who has progressed at all in Scientology can be
said to
have reached a certain level. The processes of Scientology fall into
these
levels also. And so on.
To distinguish and differentiate between the attainments and
attributes of
the individuals who are following the three different ways, the
following
terminology is introduced:
The Preclear Route
Grade is the word now used to denote the level of attainment of
a Preclear
or Co-Auditor.
369
Class or classification is the word used to denote the level of
attainment
of a Professional Auditor. The words class and classification are
reserved
entirely for the Professional Auditor.
Hence the revised nomenclature-Classification-Gradation
Programme.
Certificates may be awarded to Co-Auditors or Auditors-but
classifications
are awarded only to Auditors.
The Preclear's progress is recorded in a logbook, which is
filled in by
his auditor (or auditors) as he progresses through the various levels
and
attains higher grades. His training is limited to just enough basics
and
education to enable him to obtain the maximum benefit from the
procedures and
processes of each level. This training is not done formally or in an
Academy but
may be imparted to him by a qualified auditor. It is emphasized that
no
certificates or awards are given to the preclear.
The Co-Auditor Route
A Co-Auditor progresses in a pair with another auditor of
similar level,
or in a group which is supervised by a qualified Professional Auditor.
The level of attainment of a Co-Auditor is denoted by his
Certificate.
There is a certificate appropriate to each level, as below:
I -- HAS
II -- HQS
III -- HCA (not HPA)
IV -- HCS
V -- HAA
VI -- HSS
VII -- HGA
Note that, for Co-Auditors, there is no HPA (Hubbard
Professional Auditor)
certificate, only an HCA (Hubbard Certified or Certificated Auditor).
A Co-Auditor is not permitted to charge fees for auditing. His
certificate
has no classification seal.
In order to obtain the certificates, Academy training is
necessary (except
for HAS and HQS) but it is limited to definite periods. Successful
completion of
the course results in a certificate without further examination.
A group co-audit may not be run by a Co-Auditor, only by a
Classified
Auditor.
A Co-Auditor may transfer to the Professional Auditor level, but
must then
obtain all the necessary classifications of each level in turn.
Professional Auditors may also co-audit-the group would then be
called a
Professional Co-Audit.
The Auditor Route
Professional Auditors qualify for the same certificates as the
Co-Auditor
(except at Level III the certificate is HPA, not HCA).
They qualify for classification by further training and
examination at
each level. Their level of attainment is denoted by the appropriate
certificate,
and by a classification seal which is affixed to the certificate. The
classification seal is a gold seal stamped with a Roman numeral to
denote the
level.
Everybody has a preclear logbook and a preclear grade.
The preclear has a logbook and grade.
The Co-Auditor has a logbook and certificate.
The Auditor has a logbook, certificate and classification.
----------
In token of appreciation of their support during the early days,
any
Dianeticist or Scientologist who was in the movement before 1964 will
be awarded
a Class IV honorary Classification or Grade IV upon sending an
application to
the Auditors
370
Division of Saint Hill, giving him or her the right to use all
processes up to
and including Level 1V if they were trained before 1964, and-the right
to be
audited on all processes up to and including Level IV if they were not
trained.
----------
A comprehensive booklet on the Classification-Gradation
programme is being
printed and will soon be available for wide distribution,
----------
2. CERTIFICATION
It is intended that all certificates will be issued in effect by
the
Auditors Division of Saint Hill. -
This is a new idea but one which was probably inevitable. - - -
However, HCO Boards of Review must Continue their present system
of
issuing certificates until otherwise instructed. Full details of the
changeover
will be issued shortly, together with a date on which it takes effect.
-
3. FRANCHISE AND MEMBERSHIPS
A new look at Memberships has resulted in a new look at
Franchise also. No
radical change is contemplated in the basic idea of Franchise-i.e. the
Franchise
Holders will still be the most active and important professional
auditors
working in the field. However, instead of contributing 10% of his
gross income
to HCO WW, the Franchise Holder will now take out a special category
of
membership. Two different memberships for Franchised Auditors will be
available:
1. Professional Membership
2. Consulting Membership.
The Professional Member will pay an annual subscription of 15
guineas
sterling ($45.00), in return for which he receives a certificate, a
weekly
mailing of bulletins by surface mail, "The Auditor" magazine monthly,
and advice
and information personally from the Franchise Secretary at HCO WW.
The Consulting Member will pay an annual subscription of 45
guineas
sterling (S135.00), in return for which he receives a Consulting
Member
certificate, a weekly mailing of bulletins by air mail, "The Auditor"
magazine
monthly, and also participates in a two-way consultation service with
Saint
Hill. He will receive fast attention and advice from Saint Hill on his
preclears
and other activities, and Saint Hill will consult with him on how he
achieves
his results and success.
The whole Structure of membership is altered, the categories
being as
follows:
1. Associate Member. This is given, free of charge, to anyone, but if
the
recipient wishes he may pay 5/- for a card and Scientology pin. It
is valid
for life. Issued by all Scientology Orgs including the Auditors
Division of
Saint Hill.
2. Participating Member. This membership is available to anyone, on
payment of
3 gns, ($10) per annum. It is sold by the Central Org, and
entitles the
person to participate in its services, and receive the Continental
magazine.
3. International Member. This is available from the Auditors Division
of Saint
Hill only. It costs 5 gns (S 15.00) per annum. It entitles the
holder to the
same privileges and discounts as now, including the PAB magazine
monthly. He
also receives "The Auditor". The holder of a certificate of Level
III and
above must also hold an International Membership in order to keep
his
certificate in force.
4. Professional Member-available to Franchise Holders only, as stated
above.
Available from the Auditors Division of Saint Hill only. 15 gns
(S45.00) per
annum.
5. Consulting Member. The higher grade of Franchise Holder, as stated
above.
Available from the Auditors Division of Saint Hill only. 45 gns
($135.00)
per annum.
371
All existing memberships will carry on until they expire.
Existing Life
Memberships - (or Shares in HASI Ltd) will be honoured, but no more of
these are
to be issued now or in the future.
A separate Policy Letter will be issued shortly summarizing
memberships
and Franchise in more detail, and giving a date on which the
changeover will
take place. Until that date, the existing membership system will
continue
unchanged.
4. THE AUDITORS DIVISION OF SAINT HILL
The Auditors Division of Saint Hill is being set up, as its name
implies,
to look after auditors and co-auditors and to give them certain
services.
The purpose of the Auditors Division is: To make all the
auditors in the
world well-trained, properly accredited, successful and ethical.
The Auditors Division will do the following:
1. See that auditors and co-auditors obtain good training and give
good
processing.
2. Issue "The Auditor", the Saint Hill Journal for Auditors.
3. Set up Central Files at Saint Hill to keep records and
correspondence of
auditors throughout the world.
4. Encourage the orderly progress of auditors through the training
levels,
including their final enrolment on the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course.
5. Encourage good training generally by advices and information to
and from the
Enrolment Divisions of Central Orgs.
6. Undertake the necessary administrative actions to ensure the
efficient and
speedy issuance of certificates and classifications of all levels
throughout
the world, and keep accurate records of all certificates and
classifications.
7. Issue and administer all memberships of Saint Hill, and keep
accurate
records thereof. -
8. Maintain excellent Franchise services, via the Franchise Secretary
WW. The
Auditors Division of Saint Hill is interested primarily in
Professional
Auditors and Co-Auditors.
Well, there it is, The new look at Scientology 1964.
I hope you'll like it.
Written and Issued by: Peter
Hemery
Org
Supervisor WW
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
372
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1964
Central Orgs
SUMMARY OF CLASSIFICATION AND GRADATION AND CERTIFICATION
(Amends earlier Policy Letters)
This Policy Letter is a summary of current policy on
Classification and
Gradation and Certification, incorporating changes as mentioned in HCO
Policy
Ltr of April 22, 1964.
The purpose of Classification and Gradation is to ensure that
everyone is
given the best possible chance to progress along a well-mapped road
towards OT.
To achieve this, three well-defined routes have been established-
the
Preclear Route, the Co-Auditor Route, and the Professional Route.
The data and processes of Scientology have been categorized into
seven
Levels.
Corresponding to these Levels, Preclears have a Grade, Co-
Auditors have an
appropriate certificate, and Professional Auditors have a certificate
and a
Classification.
The rules of Classification and Gradation can therefore now be
stated as
follows: -
1. NO PRECLEAR MAY BE AUDITED ABOVE HIS OR HER GRADE.
2. NO PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR OR CO-AUDITOR MAY USE PROCESSES ON
ANYONE
ABOVE HIS OR HER GRADE.
3. A PRECLEAR MAY BE PROCESSED WITH THE PROCESSES OF HIS OR HER
GRADE OR
WITH THE PROCESSES OF ANY LESSER GRADE.
4. A PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR OR CO-AUDITOR MAY USE THE PROCESSES
OF HIS OR
HER CERTIFICATE OR CLASS, BUT MAY NOT USE ON ANY -
PARTICULAR PRECLEAR
ANY PROCESSES ABOVE THAT PRECLEAR'S GRADE REGARDLESS OF THE
PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S OR CO-AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE OR CLASS.
Without disturbing private or HGC processing commitments, and
yet placing
these as well into these Levels and Grades for the protection of the
preclear
and auditor alike, these rules are adopted and have the full force of
policy.
Effective April 15, 1965, auditors and preclears violating these
policies will
be subject to Committee of Evidence.
The word "Auditor" is used loosely to designate any person who
is auditing
a preclear, whether professionally or in a co-audit under expert
supervision.
However, it is understood that only a Classified Auditor is truly a
professional
auditor. Only a Classified Auditor is allowed to charge fees for
professional
auditing, either privately or in an HGC.
Consequent upon this, Class I and Class II are abolished, since
HAS and
HQS are not professional auditor certificates. Level I has only a HAS
(Hubbard
Apprentice Scientologist) certificate. There is no Class I. Level II
has only a
HQS (Hubbard Qualified Scientologist) Certificate. There is no Class
II.
When a person holds a HAS and a HQS, he then takes the next
course, which
is now an HCA course, and confers a HCA (Hubbard Certified Auditor)
certificate.
At this point, the person may then decide to become a
Professional
Auditor. He or she then takes further training and then undergoes an
examination
for Class III. If successful, he exchanges his HCA certificate for a
HPA
(Hubbard Professional Auditor) certificate, sealed with a Class III
seal.
373
On the other hand, the holder of a HCA (Level III) certificate
may decide
to proceed along the Co-Auditor Route. In this case, he would omit the
classification training and examination, retain his HCA certificate,
and train
Only for higher certificates, without Classification.
Thus, progress along the three routes is as follows:
1. The Preclear Route: The Preclear progresses up the Levels,
from Grade Ito Grade VI or above. He has no formal training, only enough
specified
education from his auditor to enable him to receive and benefit
from the
processes of any particular level. This training is brief and
free of
charge. A continuous record of the pc's progress is kept in a
Log Book.
Every individual, including Co-Auditors and Classified Auditors,
has one
of these Log Books and has a Grade as a Preclear.
2. The Co-Auditor Route: Preclear progress as in 1. above.
Auditor
progress is by training for Certificates only, not
Classification. There
is a Certificate for every level, as follows:
Level I - Hubbard Apprentice Scientologist (HAS)
Level II - Hubbard Qualified Scientologist (HQS)
Level III - Hubbard Certified Auditor (HCA)
Level IV - Hubbard Clearing Scientologist (HCS)
Level V - Hubbard Advanced Auditor (HAA)
Level VI - Hubbard Senior Scientologist (HSS)
Level VII - Hubbard Graduate Auditor (HGA)
3. The Professional Route: Preclear progress as in 1. above.
Auditor
progress is by training for Certificates, and also by training
and
examination for Classification, at Level III and above.
Professional Auditors have to proceed through all the Levels in
turn, but
at Level III and above they take further training followed by an
examination. The Professional Auditor's progress therefore is as
follows:
Level I - HAS
Level II - HQS
Level III - HCA (then takes Classification)
- HPA Class III
Level IV - HCS then
HCS Class IV
Level V - HAA then
HAA Class V
Level VI - HSS then
HSS Class VI
Level VII - HGA then
HGA Class VII
At each Level, he retains the Classification of the previous
Level until
he passes the next Classification examination.
All auditors including and above HQS who hold the actual
certificate may
train any person to the level of HAS, and by application to the
Auditors
Division of Saint Hill may have the person he has trained certified.
Application
forms for this will be supplied by the Auditors Division. In Central
Orgs,
training for HAS is done by the PE Foundation; training for HQS and
above by the
Academy.
Any Saint Hill graduate with a Class IV or above, by application
for
permission to the Saint Hill Auditors Division, may train any person
to the
level of HQS, and by application to the Auditors Division of Saint
Hill may have
the person he has trained certified.
A simple examination or test may be part of the HAS or HQS
course, but
confers no classification. There is no Class I or Class II.
374
Correcting previous advices, it is not now intended that all
certificates
should be issued by the Auditors Division of HCO WW. Until - further
notice,
therefore, HCO Boards of Review should continue their present system
of certification exactly - as before. Supplies of the new certificates are
being printed, and will be available from the Book Dept of HCO WW in the
usual way.
----------
A full Classification-Gradation Chart will be published from
time to time
giving the requirements and processes of every level, and concise text
books and
answer sheets are in preparation. But absence of tests shall not
preclude
training or classifying so long as the materials are communicated, at
least
until such time as texts are complete and available.
Sample check sheets will also be issued from time to time for
all courses
to ensure a consistency of training material throughout Scientology.
----------
Preclears include every individual. Preclears are separately
graded. The
grade is obtained by flattening the processes of that Level-i.e. a
preclear who
has had all the required processes of Level I flattened, would become
Grade I
and would then proceed to the processes of Level II. And so on. Each
level has
certain basic processes to be accomplished.
Preclear Gradation is not by certification but by specific log
book issued
to the preclear and signed by his auditor as each process is flattened
and a
level completed. The grade is issued to the Preclear by his Auditor
when
requirements are met in the log book.
Classification of Auditors and Gradation of Preclears effective
date is
extended to 15 April 1965. Preclear log books will be issued shortly.
The Director of Processing is in charge of all log books for the
Org's
area.
The log book also applies to Co-Audits, in which case it is
signed by the
Classified Auditor in charge of the Co-Audit.
Founding Scientologist Certificates are now being issued,
allowing up to
Class IV for trained auditors, and Grade N for Preclears. The actual
certificate
must be possessed by the individual to be in effect. The fact of
having been a
Scientologist or Dianeticist for years gives no dispensation unless
the Founding
Scientologist Certificate is in hand. Founding Scientologist
Certificates may
not be applied for after January 1, 1965.
Effective June 1, 1968, Field centres duly established with
Saint Hill
graduates Class VI and VII may train to levels as high as IV, and
Saint Hill
graduates Class IV and above are permitted, effective April 15, 1964,
to train
to HAS and HQS. On June 1, 1968, Central Orgs will be permitted to
train to
Classes V and VI, which until that date will be taught only at Saint
Hill.
----------
The General Classification-Gradation Chart Issue One is as
follows:
Class (Or Level) Process Types
Certificate
0 Dangerous environment, ARC, education in basics
of life. Case Improvement by education in
Scientology and orientation in environment.
None
I R1C for PTPs, R1CM (fishing with TA), Assists,
R2C (discussion by lists), Listen Style and Itsa.
Case Improvement by communication on closely
interested subjects and problems, using TA
Blowdowns.
HAS
II Repetitive processes, Model Session, Op-Pro-By-Dup,
8-C, CCHs, Havingness, General 0/W, ARC '63, Auditing
Cycle, Case Improvement by disciplined comm cycle,
awareness of - mind and environment, using TA of
meter and cumulative TA divisions.
HQS
III Auditing by List, Sec Checking by List, Prep-
checking,
375
Problems Intensive, Mid Ruds, and Model Session.
(Auditing by List is SOM-3L.) Case Improvement by
removing psychosomatics, cleaning needle of all
reads on given questions, any assessments done by
upper level auditor.
HCA/HPA
IV R4SC, ARC Break Assessments, R4H (R2H), and Case
Analysis. Case Improvement by Service Facsimile,
life ARC Breaks and Case Analysis, using the
listing and assessment potentials of the meter,
which is not done in lower levels.(Clearing this
lifetime.) HCS
V Omitted HAA
VI Locating the truncation, checking goals, running
the Line-Plot and Track Analysis. Case Improvement
by running pc's own goals all the way to operating
thetan. HSS
Vu Old Route One and Other Drills. HGA
The certificate schedule HCO Policy Letter of August 12, 1963,
is
cancelled, The certificate Hubbard Book Auditor is withdrawn. The
certificates
Hubbard Apprentice Scientologist, Hubbard Clearing Scientologist and
Hubbard
Advanced Auditor are reinstated.
The rules of processing apply to CLASS not to certificate. A
certificate
may have almost any lower class stamped on it. It is the
classification not the
certificate that permits use of processes or being run on processes.
In a Co-
Audit, the Classification of the supervising Auditor in charge decides
the level
of process which can be run.
It is envisioned that training courses be brief and precise and
require
exact levels of attainment as to theory, practical and auditing
requirements.
Stress in any course is 50% on auditing, 50% on case gain. A
person will
not be allowed Classification until the processes of' that Level have
been
flattened on him or her and have been accurately recorded in the log
book.
Outlines of courses, with suggested prices, have been issued,
and further
information and more detailed instructions will be issued from time to
time.
A rigid requirement of the Classification-Gradation programme is
that the
requirements of one level must be met before the individual is allowed
to
proceed to the next. This applies appropriately to each category of
person,
whether proceeding along the Preclear, Co-Auditor or Professional
route.
Thus, a preclear may not be audited on a Level IV process until
he has
completed the processes of Level III and below. An auditor may not
audit the
processes of a certain level until he has the certificate or class of
the
preceding levels. And so on.
There may be occasional exceptions to this-for instance, HGCs
and Saint
Hill trained auditors may issue special dispensation to HGC preclears
or their
own personal preclears to temporarily raise their preclear grade
during certain
phases of processing. But any abuse of the rules of the Classification-
Gradation
system which results in harm to preclears or complaints by them may
make
offenders subject to Committees of Evidence.
----------
It is not envisioned that people taking HAS or HQS or even HCA
courses are
making a career out of Scientology. They are expected to keep on
working at
their jobs. This must be stressed. There is no effort to follow
medical-
psychiatric practitioner patterns and have offices. There is an effort
to work
evening and weekends running small organizations of co-audits. The
effort is to
make Scientologists, not have "patients". This dictates the length of
the HQS
course as people can seldom get off work for more than a month.
This does not interfere, however, with someone working full time
in
Scientology, or with auditors who do want to set up offices along
traditional
practitioner lines.
Cost and length of courses rise somewhat as they increase in
Class as the
increased ability of the student, if well processed on classification
level
processes, commonly brings him or her more income and leisure.
Therefore the HCS
Course would take at
376
least 3 months and would cost in the neighbourhood of �150, if the HCA
course
was lasting 2 months and costing �78.
----------
As stated in previous issues, holders of a Founding
Scientologist
Certificate may have the right to use all processes up to and
including Class IV
if they were trained before 1964, and have the right to be audited on
everything
up to and including Class IV if they were not.
----------
It is reiterated that no classification for Class VI is now
obtainable
except by training, and no actual GPMs may be run by any auditor until
the full technology is released and the classification is earned.
At present, Classes V, VI and VII may be earned only at Saint
Hill.
----------
The intent of this programme is to
1. Open the road for everyone
2. Provide wider dissemination
3. Guarantee an increase of knowledge to keep pace with
increase of
ability
4. Provide the cheapest possible processing
5. Regulate processes by Class Level to guarantee a more real
advance
6. Steer around rough spots found in the past in technical,
administrative and personal areas.
There is no effort to decrease the income or present activity of
any
auditor or organization but only to widen the sphere of action.
This policy has been formulated with the consultation and
majority
agreement of organizations and field auditors all over the world and
is final.
The effective date is now 15 April 1965.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Added to by HCO P/L 18 June 1964, Professional Route Classification
Requirements, page 378.]
377
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 JUNE 1964
CenOCon
PROFESSIONAL ROUTE CLASSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
(Addenda to HCO Policy Letter of 5 May 1964)
The requirements for Classification under the Professional Route
are as
follows:
On completion of a Level up to Certification the student is
required to
work as an interne in the HGC-auditing those processes on which he has
been
trained. When he/she has completed one month satisfactory service in
the HGC
he/she does a retread of the level in the academy. This should occupy
half the
time of the original course and the fee is half of the fee for the
original
course. At the end of this retread he/she must pass an examination on
the whole
of the material taught. This examination should be of about 25
questions. Many
of the questions (say about a third) can be of the 'True or False'
type. The
remainder designed to bring out specific pieces of data. Over 90%
correct
answers is a pass subject to the student going and finding the correct
answers
to the questions he had wrong. Over 80% but below 90% is a flunk but
entitles
the student to take the exam again after a lapse of one day. Under 80%
is a
flunk and the student should be returned to Study for at least one
week before
taking the exam again. The questions on the examination should be
varied
frequently to avoid students swotting up on just the questions on the
examination.
During the student's period as an interne his progress should be
carefully
supervised by the D of P and a report submitted as to his competence
or
otherwise to the Examiners. Until a report of competence is received
the student
may not enter the Retread Course.
If at any time during his internship he is continuing to make
GAE's he
must be returned to Course for further study and practice. The student
is not
eligible for pay during his internship.
Issued by: Reg Sharpe, D.Scn.
Dissemination
Secretary
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
378
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY AD14
Remimeo
Franchise
Saint Hill
GRADATION PROGRAMME, REVISED
The Gradation Programme directives violated a broad,
longstanding policy
of mine: That all Dianetic and Scientology materials were for the use
of all
Dianeticists and Scientologists.
Although I have received no complaints from anyone about this, I
nevertheless do not feel right about telling Scientologists that there
are
certain materials they cannot use or be audited on.
I would rather leave this matter wholly to personal experience
of others
and make the Gradation Programme only a recommendation not a
directive.
Accordingly, therefore the following policy is issued:
1. Any and all materials of Dianetics and Scientology may be
used or
received by auditors and preclears regardless of any
assigned level or
grade;
2. That classification and certificate issue remain based on
these levels
to indicate relative skills and state of training of
auditors, and
give them the most case wins for their auditing training
level;
3. That all preclears only be advised that they will make best
progress
through following these levels in upward progress;
4. That the Gradation Programme remain as it is but without any
enforcement or discipline for failing to follow it;
5. That the Gradation Programme is only a recommended route for
best
results.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:nb.cden
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
379
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 DECEMBER 1964
Remimeo
BPI
Franchise
FULL TABLE OF COURSES AND CLASSIFICATION
Classification Correction
Due to various recommendations of National Committees it has
become
necessary to maintain a sliding scale of fees for training and for
more vital
reasons, to make HAS a fully accredited Academy Course.
This alters recently released Classification data.
There is a Class Zero. Examination for Classification will take
place on
the same basis as for any other class.
This makes the following complete training certificate and
Classification
Schedule. This changes conflicting policy earlier released and
finalizes
certification and classification.
Course Calculation All Courses
An "Academy day course" shall be four weeks long, five days per
week, 8
hours of on course time per day minimum. (Excludes lunches and
breaks.) An
evening course must contain 160 hours of actual course time, (no
breaks
included). This means 52 evenings of three hours each or any other
means of
getting 160 hours of instruction in evenings.
A weekend course must contain 160 hours of course time. (No
breaks or
lunch or dinner time included.) This can be 16 weekends of 10 hours
per weekend
or any other multiple that gives 160 hours on weekends.
An organization may not have both an evening and a weekend
course unless
they have 300 students routinely in their Academy. They have to choose
one or
the other by local choice. Weekend courses are usually more successful
than
evening courses in terms of student ability as the student is fresher
and has
more consecutive class hours. A day course is usually far more
productive of
student skill.
Course Defined
An Academy Course then hereafter means 160 hours of Class
Instruction to
Certificate for all Levels Zero to IV.
Certification and Classification Table
The PE Course is not an Academy Course. It however may continue
to be
taught.
First enrolment, Level Zero. No prior examination. 160 course
hours
duration. Certificate Hubbard Apprentice Scientologist. Awarded
without
examination.
First Classification: Prior to entering the next course (hours
or weeks or
months before) the student must take a written and practical
examination for
CLASS ZERO. If the student passes he is at once awarded his
Classification by
HCO and it is sealed on his HAS Certificate or given by letter and
then sealed.
Second Course. Level I. Hubbard Qualified Scientologist. Pre-
requisite,
HAS course and certificate. No prior classification required. 160
course hours
duration.
380
Certificate awarded without examination: Hubbard Qualified
Scientologist.
Second Classification: Prior to entering the Level II course,
hours or
months, the student must take his written and practical Classification
examination for Level I. On passing he is at once awarded his Class I
Classification and it is certified by HCO letter or stamped and sealed
on his
certificate. If the student has not passed a prior classification exam
and is
not Class 0 yet, this second examination is the Class 0 examination
and on
passing it he has Class 0 awarded by HCO by letter or stamped and
sealed on his
highest certificate. He may also take his Class I examination as soon
afterwards
as he sees fit.
Third Course Level II. 160 Academy hours. At course end,
regardless of
class as usual, he is awarded his certificate without examination as
Hubbard
Certified Auditor.
Third Classification, Class II. Prior to entering his fourth
course, hours
or months, the student may take his Classification examination for
Class II. If
passed it is signified as usual by HCO. If the student has no
classification up
to this point, this examination is for Class 0. If he has no Class I
yet, it is
for Class I. He may take the other higher classification examinations
as soon as
he wishes.
Fourth Course, Level III. 160 Academy hours. On completion,
awarded
certificate without examination as Hubbard Professional Auditor.
Fourth Classification, Class III. Prior to entering his fifth
course,
Level IV, hours or months, the student may take his classification
examination
for Class III. If he has no classification to this time, the same
procedure as
earlier is followed.
Fifth Course, Level IV. This like all other courses may be
entered whether
the student has passed his examinations or not. After 160 Academy
Course hours,
the student, without examination, is given his Hubbard Clearing
Scientologist
Certificate.
Fifth Classification, Class IV. Prior to his entering an R6
course a student, after January 1, 1968, must bring all his classifications
up to Class IV before entering an R6 course, whether this is done at an
organization or at Saint Hill, and no matter where the R6 course is taught.
Sixth Course, Level VI. Without training hours limit, but with a
minimum
of 400 course hours, the student completes the course by a completion
of all
check sheets or additional work assigned, and results in an award of
Hubbard
Senior Scientologist.
Sixth Classification, Class VI. Examination given before the end
of the
Sixth Course and if passed, an award of Provisional Class VI is given
by
notification permitting the student to audit Class VI materials. When
a
successful period of observed auditing ensues, the Classification is
confirmed
as Class VI and the fact is attested by letter or by sealing and
stamping the
certificate. If the auditing period is not successful or for any other
detrimental reason, the provisional classification may be retained. If
the
reasons are very detrimental, the provisional classification may be
withdrawn.
This however cancels no earlier classification.
Table of Authorized Courses
Field Auditor: PE Course. Curriculum as taught in Central Orgs
over the
years, based on the Dublin Personal Efficiency Course.
Franchise Holder: PE Course. Already granted permissions to
teach HAS and
HQS expire on January 1, 1966. Curriculum until then must exactly
follow recent
HCO Bulletins outlining these two courses. HCO must give all
Classification
examinations to Franchise Holder students.
City Of/Ice: PE Course permitted but not required. HAS, HQS and
HCA.
Permission to teach HCA expires January 1, 1966, at which time City
Offices will
teach only HAS and HQS.
381
Central Organizations: PE Course may be taught but is not
recommended for
Central Orgs. Must teach HAS, HQS, HCA and HCS Courses. A Central
Organization
will be reviewed on its student record on January 1, 1968 to establish
the
possibility of its teaching an HSS Course but permission not
guaranteed and only
one will be granted in a national area, if granted.
Obvious Conclusion
From the above it will be obvious that active Field Auditors are
expected
to become Franchise Holders in the future, that Franchise Holders will
become
City Offices, that City Offices will become Central Organizations and
the
national headquarters will become, eventually, a university. Aside
from an
expectancy that Field Auditors will continue to become Franchise
Holders, no
drastic upgrade is expected until after January 1, 1966.
Auditors equipped to do so, on becoming Franchise Holders may
still apply
for permissions to teach HAS and HQS but these permissions all expire
for
Franchise Holders on January 1, 1966. On or before that date a new
type of PE
Course will be released for Franchise Holders to teach. And there is a
possibility that Franchise Holders may be newly granted permission to
teach HAS
on January 1, 1966 depending entirely upon their teaching record with
HCO WW.
As Field Auditors were teaching only a PE Course as an HAS
Course, this is
more a change of name than a refusal to permit them to teach. They may
go on
teaching the same course, but must call it a PB Course and must not
call it an
HAS Course.
Whether or not a City Office goes on teaching the HCA Course
after January
1, 1966 depends entirely upon its activity. This matter also is
subject to
review on January 1, 1966.
Franchise Holders who are behind-hand in their contributions to
HCO WW
are, as always, subject to franchise suspension or cancellation. If a
franchise
is suspended, teaching in progress may go on but no further students
may be
enrolled. If a franchise is cancelled, the existing students may be
graduated,
but will be very vigorously examined as low teaching quality or a
poorly
scheduled and careless course can be a grounds for cancellation if not
mended
when called to the Franchise Holder's attention.
----------
A Central Organization or City Office, until January 1, 1968,
may teach
any course they are allowed to anyone enrolling, regardless of former
certification. This is to the end of improving auditing skill. They
may not,
after January 1, 1965, teach any special or data courses other than
their
regular Academy Courses at the specified rates.
Until January 1, 1968, then, the policy of not retraining
auditors is
waived. Until January 1, 1968 any student enrolling for any course in
the period
from January 1, 1965 to January 1, 1968, regardless of training prior
to January
1, 1965, may be directed into any lower course being taught at the
Academy
wholly and only at the discretion of the Director of Training. This is
to
resolve the impossibility of teaching someone at current Level IV who
has not
been well grounded, for instance, in Level III. Adjustment of training
will have
to be done until January 1, 1968 Certainly, until the bulk of training
activities have cared for gaps in an auditor's education prior to
January 1,
1965.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
382
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MARCH 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
Sthil Students
BPI
CLEARING AND TRAINING
In the not too distant future, certainly within a couple years,
being
clear will be a requisite to being accepted for any training.
The book auditor will be back with us in full swing. Auditing
will be done
of a kind. An HAS Course might be given.
But I feel that from there on up processing comes before
training.
It would go this way. A person is processed up through the
Grades, 0 to
IV, getting his preclear grade certificate at each level. Then the
person is
accepted for training from Class Ito Class VII, class by class.
People are already causing "problems" (joke) today in Academies
and HGCs.
They are also going clear before they have finished all their grades
as pcs and
in Academies before "they can be audited on the upper levels (such as
III and
IV)".
We're too good suddenly. An auditor might feel his practice
would go to
pieces if preclears only took a few intensives to go through all the
Grades from
0 to IV. The tendency to slow anyone down must be handled before it
begins.
We ought to operate only organizations and have large numbers of
groups
like we used to. Quantities of people is the answer.
Then as we clear them in HGCs we transfer them over to the
Academy to go
on up to Class IV and then to Saint Hill for all the way to OT.
It's quite a feasible route. Actually very easy if the tech is
applied.
It would be an interesting Academy with the students not being
able to
audit each other on lower grades, but having to scrounge pcs off the
street to
get their auditing cheek sheet complete. But with the majority of them
clear
they'd whizz through their check sheets in less than the allotted
month now
allowed for each course between 0 and IV.
It is surely, surely true that nobody will make OT without
training. Some
auditors (Homer, Berner) are reported to have been trying to put "raw
meat pcs"
on Class VI processes on the sly with what is reported as rather awful
results
and spins. I hadn't heard about it, being away a bit, and the auditors
were
saved by the recent amnesty, but what a foolish and cruel thing to do
when the
route Grade 0 to IV is wide open for pcs, with wins all the way. Why
throw the
poor fellow in a ditch? The pcs of course stupidly demand to be OT
yesterday,
but what's a few weeks processing on the grades? Nobody will make OT
without
training. That's a technical fact. The Level VI processes just don't
bite on
lower level pcs!
There'd be no tendency to slow up or speed up a pc's progress if
clear
were required before people were trained.
They had a crisis on the Saint Hill Course just Monday. Student
that was
cleared in Washington DC couldn't be put through her preclearing for
Class III
and IV as the state of IV had been attained at III So we have to
"solve" how to
train clears anyway. We'll have to get a source of pcs for them to
audit as
nobody can get a meter to work on a clear, so they can't be preclears
anymore.
They're ready for OT as case but can't go on because that requires a
full
knowledge of auditing from 0 to IV for OT to be successfully attained.
What a nice job instructing would be teaching only clears!
LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
383
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1965
REISSUED 4 JULY 1970
Remimeo
CLASSIFICATION, GRADATION AND
AWARENESS CHART
You will find a chart enclosed in the Auditor Issue 8. It covers
many
things.
There are about 52 levels of awareness from Unexistence up to
the state of
CLEAR.
By "Level of Awareness" is meant that of which a being is aware.
A being who is at a level on this scale is aware only of that
level and
the others below it.
To get a case gain such a person must become aware of the level
next above
him. And so on up in orderly sequence, level by level.
If you skip a person on one level several levels up, he or she
will
experience only an unreality and will not react. This is expressed as
"no case-
gain". On the B-Meter it registers as "No Tone Arm Action" meaning
there is no
meter registry of change on the meter control lever (tone arm).
A person audited a bit below or at his level of awareness gets
"Tone Arm
Action", Case Gain and has cognitions (new concepts of life).
A principal contribution of Scientology is the technology
necessary to
change people so that they progress into higher states of ability when
processed
on the exact processes required by an auditor qualified by training to
apply the
processes expertly.
It is not only general ability that increases, but IQ, renewed
livingness
and the skill and ability to better self and conditions.
The state of homo sapiens runs from around -4 down to the
bottom. Normal
is probably much lower.
As you study the chart you will see it is a road map upward.
On the left we see the Class of the Auditor necessary to take
the person
up as well as the Grade the preclear reaches.
In the next column we see his certificate name, obtained through
his
training at an Academy and, later, Saint Hill.
Then we see a very general description of the processes used on
that
grade.
The next column shows what pcs a classified auditor can audit.
He can
audit anyone at his Class numeral or below. He cannot audit pcs higher
because
of course he has not been trained to do so and is likely to have upset
pcs.
The final column shows where the certificate and class is
obtained.
384
THE BRIDGE
This is the famous bridge mentioned at the end of Dianetics the
Modern
Science of Mental Health.
It is now complete and is functioning. The being enters it from
somewhere
in the minus regions as a Beginning Scientologist and moves on up. At
about
Grade II he has definitely reached Homo Novis. He becomes a RELEASE
somewhere
between II and V. And he becomes CLEAR at the top of VI. The state of
Operating
Thetan is attained above VI and is a Grade VII.
For Man to have this at all is quite remarkable. He never had it
before
since we find him improving but still, on the average well below -4.
By following this chart one can make RELEASE and then CLEAR.
Up to Grade V one of course has help. But above that technical
limitations
bar completely the idea of CO-auditing. Some auditors will attempt it,
themselves very far from there case-wise, and some have tried to show
untrained
pcs how to "solo audit" with a meter. The common result is that the
pcs
eventually collapse in a total overwhelm as they are not trained to
handle such
forces and so it is a cruel thing to do.
The preclear moves safely on the proper bridge and somewhere
along the
line must be trained in the classifications that match his Grade. Then
(and only
then) can he make it all the way.
One can be audited quite a ways. Then he had better get trained
from zero
on up.
You see here some new certificates. These were made necessary by
the gap
which existed between the higher toned public person (-5) and the
beginning of
the span. We had to have a longer approach to the bridge. And so we
put a
certificate ladder there.
Beginning Scientologist is given for a PB and so on up as the
chart shows.
The Class material has not been changed. If anyone has a Class
Zero he is
still a Class Zero but we will give him a new certificate to replace
his old
one. And so on. There is no change in Grades and Certificates from
Class II up.
Class V has been blank for years. Thus there is a proper certificate
there, the
HUBBARD VALIDATED AUDITOR. It says this auditor has been through a
review of all
his lower skills plus new ones and can jump off now for Solo and
CLEAR.
Previously we not only did not reach into the average homo
sapien's
awareness but we also had no means of touching cases much below -4.
You are probably intrigued by Class VII. These Power Processes
are what
the CLEAR (or Auditor almost there) audits on low level pcs. Auditors
below that
case level can of course run them a bit but the processes shortly cave
him in.
These processes are only available at Saint Hill as they have just
recently been
perfected and an auditor to do them without danger to himself or the
pc has to
have interned at Saint Hill as a Saint Hill HGC staff auditor, not the
same as a
Class VI Saint Hiller.
The thing to do is start in your local Academy at zero on the
chart and
move on up.
Today that is faster and less expensive than you would think.
There are two courses to one class. First one does the
Certificate Course
(Theory) and gets his certificate. This takes the average student
about two
weeks. Then one takes the Classification Course (Practical) for that
class and
gets his Provisional Classification. Every auditor must be classified
now. This
again takes the average Student about two weeks. All the courses from
Class 0 up
to IV are arranged that way.
385
The material has been streamlined. Class V, obtained at Saint Hill, is
longer
(and remains the same price as always) as it reviews all the classes
and
retrains where necessary and awards permanent classification for all
the lower
certificates as well as Class V.
Some auditing occurs in the classification course and group
auditing
occurs daily.
An unclassed auditor cannot charge a fee for auditing a grade he
is not
classed for and if he is turned in to HCO because of it the pc can
regain all
the fee from him. We must make it a safe bridge. Our entire Ethics
system is
formed just to make it a safe passage for the pc and to hold the
bridge together
so it can be crossed by Man.
Auditors routinely make Releases with Academy courses today.
Auditors graduated from the Saint Hill course can then take the
final
steps to make themselves clear and Saint Hill Interns are trained to
make
Releases of the lowest cases.
Training fees are uniform in the US now at SlOO for each course.
In all
commonwealth countries the cost is �28 a course sterling (convert to
local
currency). There is one course for Certificate, followed by another
for
Classification.
Field auditors can charge anything they like for HAS and
Beginning
Scientologist courses. And Hubbard Book Auditors can become HQS
through
extension courses. Your org may possibly give the lowest course free
and charge
very little for the HAS.
----------
My job is to give you the materials to make Releases and the
skill to make
Clear. I have done and will do everything I can to help anyone attain
these
hitherto unreachable heights of life and ability.
The bridge is not only in, it is functioning every hour right
now. Book
early. The traffic is heavy already. And auditors are the scarcest and
most
valued beings on this planet.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:nt.aap
Copyright ($) 1965, 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
386
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 MAY 1965
(Revised and reissued on 19 Sept 1967)
Remimeo
Issue a
copy to every
Person attaining
Release
Qua1 Pers Hats
Tech Pers Hats
Students RELEASES
VITAL DATA
Persons who have attained Grade V and VA Release may not be
audited on any
processes except assists, By Passed Charge Assessments, Present Time
Problems,
and missed withholds until they are trained up to Level VI and started
on R6
processes unless a lower level including Dianetic Release was later
found to be
missed.
Although the training of the Release is necessary, and auditing
knowledge
of lower level process is vital, the Release's case as a case must be
left alone
except as above.
The only thing left is the R6 bank itself and low level auditing
becomes
unworkable on a person already Released up to Grade V.
When we called a Release a "Keyed out Clear" we erred in giving
any
further casual auditing. It was this which made the state of Release
look
unstable when it seemed so-the person was further audited to relieve
him or her
of locks, secondaries and engrams which had ceased to exist.
Withholds may be pulled, present time problems may be lightly
handled,
even By Passed Charge Assessments may be run, touch assists and
ordinary brief
repair processes may be used on a Release.
The Release can audit lower level processes than V with complete
safety.
Auditing a Release on repetitive Comm processes, etc., etc., or
doing any
continued sessioning will only key in the only thing left-the R6 bank.
A Release is stable as long as he or she is not pushed into the
R6 bank.
The next step for a Grade VA Release in auditing is R6 EW.
However the
Release may not begin this until auditing skill is acquired by coming
up the
levels.
It will now become quite common for a student to be Released by
a Clear
and then study and audit his way up the grades to VII.
Nobody can do the VII clearing job for him but himself, and
fragmentary
auditing training will only lead him to mess up his case when he comes
to Grade
VI and VII auditing.
On the other hand a Release with his high IQ and ability can
scoot up the
Classes at considerable speed if not stopped by having to be audited
as part of
his training.
There is no special concession made to a Release by way of check
sheets or
a different kind of Course. The Release must move on up through the
Classes
course by course like any other student.
There are two saving graces to being a Release as far as
training is
concerned:
387
1. The Release ordinarily experiences a heightened ability to
put his
life to rights economically; and
2. The heightened IQ and ability reflects in speed of study and
comprehension.
A person does not have more Scientology data just because he or
she is a
Release. The Release simply acquires it much faster and exhibits more
skill
doing it.
For example, a student able before Release, to get only one or
two passes
a week on a Course should be able, when Released, to get ten times
that.
The Release is cautioned not to fool about with the R6 materials
until
fully trained and to pay no attention to suppressive persons who "seek
to show
him in an hour or two how to audit and run R6 and be clear."
The safe way is the correct way. Leave the Reactive mind alone
until one
is fully trained as an auditor. Then go on to Clear.
A Release is also warned that he becomes a particular target for
suppressive persons who seek to invalidate his auditing and gains and
to report
them promptly to the nearest Hubbard Communications Office. Such
people become
afraid when they see another get better and are usually psychotic.
----------
The next action for a person who has attained Release is to take
the next
Course in Scientology and move on through to Clear properly. This is
shown on
the Gradation Chart issued in May 1965, and later issues. There is no
other way
to Clear.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mh.jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1965, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: This 19 Sept 1967 issue contains the following changes: (1) in
paragraph
1, addition of "unless a lower level including Dianetic Release was
later found
to be missed", (2) in paragraph 3, addition of phrase "up to Grade V",
(3) in
paragraph 10, word "grades" used instead of "Classes", (4) in
paragraph 11,
"Grade VI and VII auditing" instead of "Class VI".]
388
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
BPI HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JUNE AD 15
Franchise
Sthil Students
Sthil Staff
Remimeo
RELEASES, DIFFERENT KINDS
There are different kinds of Releases.
They all have the similar meter phenomena; floating needle and
on or near
clear read on a calibrated Mark IV or Mark V.
There is the plain First Stage Release. This occurs in auditing
up to
Grade IV. It is not very stable. The person is very well off and
definitely a
Release. But he or she can now postulate and in postulating sometimes
gets into
the R6 Bank. The First Stage Release is eased out of the bank but
subject to
call back.
Then there is the Power Process Release. This is very stable and
should be
called a Second Stage Release or a Power Release to be technically
exact. You
can run only Power Processes on a First Stage Release. These knock out
all
factors of the track that force a person back into the R6 Bank and
leave the
person able to go into or get Out of the. R6 Bank easily. This Second
Stage
Release is definitely Homo Novis. The person ceases to respond like a
homo
sapiens and has fantastic capability to learn and act.
The Third Stage Release (called for a few days a Second Stage
before
terminology was firm) is an improved Second Stage Release in that
selective
areas of learning are handled to return special skills to the person.
The case
state does not necessarily improve but certain zones of knowledge have
been
polished up.
There is another state near that of Release. This is a Keyed-Out-
Operating
Thetan. At this time it occurs sometimes by accident in Power
Processing, but I
think I will be able to process a Second Stage Release to it directly
some day.
The pc is still a pre clear though a Keyed-Out-OT. This really isn't a
Thetan
Exterior. The Thetan Exterior is quite unstable and can be attained
below an
ordinary First Stage Release.
A real Clear is of course on the other side of the Reactive Bank
and above
all these states. It is completely stable. One needs to know how to
audit to get
there.
A real Operating Thetan is of course a Clear who has been
familiarized
with his environment to a point of total cause over Matter, Energy,
Space, Time
and Thought.
This accounts for all states of being discussed in .Dianetics or
Scientology. They are all attainable and only one, Keyed-Out-OT is not
done by
routine auditing, being an offshoot of it that happens sometimes. The
First
Stage Release is as high as we got in Dianetics, so you can see we are
five
states of being above where we first arrived.
We are doing these today on a routine assembly line basis on all
cases.
Orgs do a lot of First Stage Releases. Saint Hill is doing Power
Releases and
moving people up to Clear through Academy and Saint Hill training.
A lot of cases would have to spend a lot more time in Power
Processing if
they weren't already successfully processed in Grades 0 to IV.
The majority of cases even when trained, will not be able to go
Clear
without being Released.
And of course nobody is going to go OT before they have been
Audited,
Released, trained and cleared, all of which are currently standard
actions in
Scientology today.
We are definitely on our way.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mh.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
389
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo
BPI HCO BULLETIN OF 5 AUGUST 1965
Certs & Awards
Issue to all new
Releases
RELEASE STAGES
Once a pc has begun to come out of his bank, he either continues
to come
out or goes back in a bit.
He (Or she) does not remain in status quo (unchanging state)
while a
Release.
A First Stage Release often pulls further out to First Stage
Released OT
after processing.
Similarly a Second Stage Release may become a Second Stage
Released OT.
In their understandable enthusiasm-they feel so much better and
bigger and
stronger-a release sometimes seeks additional acknowledgment by
requesting a
further release check.
A pc who has attained a First Stage can go First Stage Released
OT but
cannot possibly go Second Stage without Power Processing. In short,
one can't
upgrade stages 1 to 2, etc without the actual processing.
Why? Because a key out is just that, a key out. Just because one
no longer
has a tiger in his lap does not mean the tiger has vanished. He's
merely stepped
out into the hall. In the course of life somebody is going to leave
the door
open. The tiger won't come back into one's lap but he'll sure sit on
the rug and
sneer. Key out means there's still a tiger. Release means he's away.
One First
Stage can be more released than another First Stage. The tiger is
further off.
But when you start upgrading numbers (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc) you
are talking
about less tiger.
There's less bank.
First Stage removes a few tiger whiskers and the sneer. That's
the locks
going. The tiger is near or far-that means more or less 1st Stage, it
doesn't
mean there's less tiger.
Second Stage removes the tiger's misemotjon and his front claws.
The tiger
can now be near or far but he is that much tiger. .He can be so far
away one is
sure he has vanished. But he's just far. He remains that much tiger
(minus
whiskers, sneer, temper and front claws), he just isn't evident.
Third Stage pulls the tiger's ability to paralyze one's wits. In
effect
Third Stage removes impediments to one's ability to know. The tiger,
though now
minus whiskers, sneer, temper, front claws, and the ability to
paralyze is still
about. He may at this stage walk off so far that one is positive there
is no
more tiger. But it's early to break out the champagne. Maybe he won't
be back
for years, even centuries, but he still exists.
Fourth Stage Release removes the tiger's claws all about and
blunts his
teeth. And causes him to hide in closets. But though he hasn't
whiskers, sneer,
claws, or his frightening effect, or the old sharpness, he is still a
tiger. One
can gambol about in the sun cheerily, feeling quite sure there is no
tiger at
all. Only the locks on the R6 bank are gone. That R6 bank is still
there.
At this stage the pc feels he can move mountains single handed
and is
given to chest thumping. That he still depends upon a body gets
overlooked.
But ahead of him is the BIG job. There is still a tiger. This
tiger if not
vanished utterly will sooner or later creep up and eat up the goodies.
So one has to handle Mr. Tiger once and for all, run the total
R6 bank and
become a 5th Stage Release.
Now, and only now, with a bit of reorientation can one be CLEAR.
No more
tiger. He is not near or far. He doesn't exist. And one can go on for
the
trillions.
Early on my pcs went keyed out clear and went away. They stayed
that way a
long time.
They were sure they had attained the zenith.
390
Today we are going to have the same problem.
A Release is going to feel sure he has gone up in number of
Release when
it's only the tiger out for lunch.
I am the last one to throw cool water over anyone's head about
Release.
But I have a passion for stating truth as I know it when I know it.
You can
always depend on that. It's not always popular but it's honest.
Therefore these are the only ways to go up in number as a
Release.
To obtain FIRST STAGE RELEASE, one must have had lower grade
auditing of
some sort. This removes the locks (the distressful moments of life)
off the
Reactive Mind. As these pinned one to it, one can now get out of it.
To obtain SECOND STAGE RELEASE one must have been run on the
highest of
the Power Processes. This gets rid of the secondaries (misemotions and
upsets)
and the engrams (moments of pain and unconsciousness). And as these
pinned one
to the Reactive Mind one can now move Out of it and isn't so likely to
go back
into it as he has no secondaries and engrams to call him back.
To obtain THIRD STAGE RELEASE one has to tackle the beings,
places and
subjects one has long detested. And when these are gone one isn't
likely to be
called back into the Reactive Mind very soon as bits of his daily life
don't
remind him of beings, places and subjects he once detested.
To obtain FOURTH STAGE RELEASE one has to take the lock end
words off the
R6 bank. He has to be an R6 Auditor himself to do this properly. With
these
gone, the R6 bank is left on its naked basics and one can be very free
of it for
quite a while.
But now we are down to the concrete and bedrock.
To obtain a FIFTH STAGE RELEASE, one has to have run out the
whole
remaining Reactive Mind. We are awfully lucky to have the combination
to the
vault as it's been shut thoroughly for the trillions. That's done by a
process
known as R6-GPMI-or GPMs by Items. And I assure you
1. It can be done and
2. It was pure hell going it blind when I was trying to find it.
It took
several years and thousands of hours of research auditing to just find
the
pattern of it. This is the longest job (R6-GPMI) and requires now at
least 14
months of daily solo auditing. And then one is 5th Stage and ready for
a polish
and Clear.
Now understand, at each of these stages one has to go unrelease
to make it
to the next stage of release. This requires guts-and faith. One is
feeling
GRAND. The world is. beautiful. The unbrave get nervous at the thought
of diving
back into the asphalt or, to keep our metaphor, about deliberately
whistling up
the Tiger-"Here Tiger! Here Tiger! Come out wherever you are" So a way
that is
cooked up to avoid this further combat is to pretend an. upgrade in
number of
release without the hard work and scratches necessary to honestly
achieve it.
Add to all this that one has a present time, and a body to
receive the
slings and arrows and one sees that it is a complex picture.
But we have the way. It is the way.
Many will come along selling the frightened the idea one can
leap up
through the numbers without pain or toil or auditing by flexing one's
chest or
eating wheaties or praying. But that isn't the WAY. There's no bridge
there.
The main point that will be stumbled on is. this: Nobody has any
real
reality on how high up these states are or how utterly tall Clear
really is.
----------
Well, that's the score. Does it help?
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
391
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 AUGUST AD15
Remimeo
CLASSIFICATION AT UPPER LEVELS
TEMPORARY MEASURE
Classification for Levels II, III and IV may be obtained by
presenting
evidence of. skillfully applying one of the processes below rather
than grade
processing to the Examiner.
The Examiner must be satisfied as to the general skill of the
auditor.
Auditing By List, R2-l2, R4H can be run on a person who went 1st
Stage
Release on Comm Processes. (Warning-R2-l2 is too fast and got us into
trouble
by releasing too quickly and was grossiy overrun by all. It was
withdrawn but
now its fault has been found. Of all processes it releases most
quickly.)
The following can be run on any pe:
1. ARC Breaks
2. PTPs
3. Withholds
4. Any Continuing Overts
5. Release Rehabilitation.
In fact these must be covered in reviewing cases.
1. No-one must be audited while ARC Broken but the ARC Break can be
found,
located and indicated.
2. A PTP drives the pc into back track in an effort to avoid it.
3. TA ceases to increase or declines in the presence of a missed
withhold
(particularly one missed when the TA ceased to increase or
declined).
4. A pc continually committing hidden overts in PT won't advance at
all.
5. You can always rehabilitate a moment of former release.
Therefore any of the above 1 to 5 can be run on any release of
any stage.
Thus an Examiner can require one of the above processes
demonstrated for
the level they match in lieu of grade processing for the
classification
requirement.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.pp.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
392
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 AUGUST 1965
Remimeo
RELEASE STAGES
There are five stages of Release. When one of these is attained
the next
one up can be run.
A preclear who has attained a stage of Release may not be run
further on
the processes of that stage or below or he will go back into his
Reactive Mind.
All Releases however can have their problems handled, their
withholds
pulled, their ARC Breaks repaired and any Release at any stage can be
audited on
the exact processes of Release Rehabilitation.
The states of Release differ in that one is more stable than
another.
The Reactive Mind (known also as the R6 Bank) can only be
audited out by
someone who is trained up to Class VI. When the Reactive Mind is fully
audited
out (erased completely), one has a Clear.
When .a Clear has been refamiliarized with his capabilities, you
have an
Operating Thetan (an OT).
A Release, then, is pulled OUT of his Reactive Mind.
A Clear has fully erased his Reactive Mind.
An Operating Thetan is one who is Cause over Matter, Energy,
Space and
Time and is not in a body.
The degree and relative permanence of being pulled out of the
Reactive
Mind determines the state of Release.
There are numerous things that can pull one back into the
Reactive Mind.
These are (1) Locks (2) Secondaries (3) Engrams (4) The Whole
Time Track.
LOCKS
By reducing locks as in Levels 0 to IV, we then remove the
ability of
locks to pull the being back into his R6 Bank.
Locks are mental image pictures of non-painful, but disturbing
experiences, the person has experienced. They depend for their force
on
secondaries and engrams.
Thus, one who has had his locks reduced is a FIRST STAGE
RELEASE.
SECONDARIES and ENGRAMS
When a being has had the secondaries and engrams reduced, he is
far less
likely to be pulled into the Reactive Mind than if he has just had
their locks
reduced.
Secondaries are mental image pictures containing misemotion
(grief, anger,
apathy, etc). They contain no pain. They are moments of shock and
stress and
depend for their force on underlying engrams.
393
Engrams are mental image pictures of pain and unconsciousness
the person
has experienced.
When these are reduced, one has a SECOND STAGE RELEASE.
THE WHOLE TRACK
Bits and pieces of the whole track remain after the locks,
secondaries and
engrams are reduced. These bits inhibit the being from recovering
knowledge.
The Whole Track is the moment to moment record of a person's
existence in
this universe in picture and impression form.
When these bits are cleaned up, a being is a THIRD STAGE
RELEASE.
THE REACTIVE MIND
When the pc has taken the locks off the Reactive Mind itself,
using R6EW,
he attains Fourth Stage Release.
THE REACTIVE MIND
When the entire Reactive Mind has been erased and the person is
again
wholly himself, one could call it a Fifth Stage Release.
But that is really CLEAR.
OPERATING THETAN
When a being once more has recovered his full abilities and
freedom, a
state much higher than Man ever before envisioned is attained. This
state is
called OPERATING THETAN
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
394
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1965
Rem line o
All Scientology
Staff URGENT URGENT URGENT
RELEASE GRADATION
NEW LEVELS OF RELEASE
Further research has revealed additional data concerning
Releases which
makes it necessary to re-name the types of Release, or else deny
preclears all
the benefits available from states of Release.
As mentioned in earlier lectures there are several intermediate
stages of
Release between Level Zero and Level Five. I have finally isolated
these and
they agree with the Gradation Chart of Levels.
This changes also in some degree the upper levels of Academy
training
materials without actually adding any but only reassigning the same
materials to
different levels.
This discovery came out of a survey of the only things that
could balk a
case. These also are the main things an auditor has to be careful
about in pcs.
Further study revealed the state of Release to be available on each of
these
points and that therefore, both to make Releases and better trained
auditors,
these were fitted in to the Gradation Chart in natural sequence as the
dominant
points stressed on each level.
The points are the same as those covered in the current "Out
Tech"
Bulletins and lecture.
They are:
Communication
ARC Breaks
PTPs
O/Ws
Continuous Overts
So as to minimize any upset in introducing these additional
levels of
Release we will cease to call Release by stages and call them by
Grades. In
earlier material and lectures the terms "1st Stage Release" indicated
a person
released anywhere between Level Zero and Level IV, a "Second Stage
Release"
indicated a Power Process Release, a "Third Stage Release" was one
made by
orientation processes and a "Fourth Stage Release" meant one made by
R6 EW. This
was before I found that the additional levels were important or
obtainable.
Without wiping out the meaning of these "stages", we will simply cease
to use
them to designate Releases and designate by GRADES. We will then use
the exact
processes of the grades that obtain the state of Release for the
preclear and
thus keep things straight.
This then is the new Grading:
Type of Release Type of Process
Grade VII --- CLEAR
Grade VI Release - R6 EW
Grade V Release - Power Processes
Grade IV Release - Service Facsimiles
Grade III Release - ARC Break Processes (old R-4-H renamed R-3-
H)
Grade II Release - 0/W Processes (including the "Joburg")
Grade I Release - Problems Processes (such as Probs
Intensive or CCHs)
Grade 0 Release - Communication Processes
395
Any one of the above group of processes can (and should be) run
to a
Floating Needle (and not one command beyond it).
With auditors warned of the consequences of running beyond the
state of
Release and people easily rehabilitated to the state even if it is
overrun, it
will be found that the state is attainable at each level with smooth
auditing.
This ties smoothly into training as a class of auditor is
capable of
making a class of Release.
Knowing why people Roller Coaster (Potential Trouble Source) and
what an
SP (Suppressive Person) is and by carefully handling training of
auditors in
accordance with the "Out Tech" materials we can easily attain these
states for
preclears.
The discovery is actually contained in the first material issued
that
calls attention to not further auditing Releases. They could have
their ARC
Breaks, PTPs and Overts handled. This when I followed it up showed
that
additional Release states existed for these types of phenomena.
There are some additional processes that can be run at certain
levels and
as these are proven out they will be added as alternate processes to
the level.
However, it will be found that when a preclear goes Release at a
Grade, it will
not be advisable to further audit him or her in that grade on an
additional
process once the phenomena of Release has been attained for that
grade. It may
be that if a pc fails to go Release on the recommended process for
that grade,
another process for that grade included under the type of process for
that grade
may be used. For instance, on Problems, the pc does not go Grade I
Release in
the regular buttons of a Problems Intensive. Other buttons may be
found- and
used. Or the preclear may be run on "Rising Scale Processes" or
another process
listed for that grade, all toward the goal of making the pc a Release
from
Problems. You don't run a pc on the next grade just because you
couldn't Release
him on the lower grade. You run the additional processes of a grade
until he
releases at that grade.
At Grade Zero you run Comm Processes of whatever kind until you
have a
Grade Release. That means a "Communication Release". Then you do the
same at
Grade I and run any version of problems, that affects the person's
problems
until you have a Grade I Release, a "Problems Release".
Therefore you are releasing the person on certain subjects at
each grade.
The scale can then be written like this.
Grade VII CLEAR - Bank Erased
Grade VI Release - Whole Track Release
Grade V Release - Power Release
Grade IV Release - HABIT Release
Grade III Release - ARC Release
Grade II Release - Overt Release
Grade I Release - Problems Release
Grade 0 Release - Communication Release
You can readily spot that under each of these headings we have
several
effective processes in addition to a principal process.
The most indicated processes for these levels are listed in the
first list
of grades above.
If a former Release went Release on, let us say Problems, he can
be
rehabilitated on the Problems Release and then audited on any of the
other
grades from IV down. In short, anyone who went Release on one of these
Grades
from IV down may not be audited further on that grade but can be
released on any
one of the other grades 0 to IV omitting only Grade I Release,
Problems.
396
Of course from V (Power Processes) on up it becomes improbable
to run a
lower grade but it possibly could be done on some cases. However, a
Grade VI
Release (R6 EW) can't possibly be run below Grade VI. Arid on a Clear,
there's
no bank at all, only freedom.
It's also noteworthy that it's all but impossible to do Grade V,
Power
Processes, on a former release that has not been fully rehabilitated
on the
lower grade.
In training it is therefore necessary to put a Meter in the
hands of a
student at Zero and have him able to clean Tone Arm action well at
Level I, be
able to detect and clean reads at II and not clean cleans, be able to
assess at
III and find Service Facs at IV.
This means also that at Zero you teach the student all about
Communication, its formula and the Comm Cycle and TRs. At I you teach
repetitive
commands, problems intensives (assessed by an upper class auditor as
we used to
do) and the CCHs (which pull the person out of problems and into PT).
At II you
teach a student all about STUDY (the genus of overts is the
misunderstood) and
O/Ws. At III you teach the student all about ARC and ARC Breaks and
assessment
and how to do old R-4-H in full and expertly. And at IV you teach the
student
all about "Deds" and "Dedexes" (History of Man) and justified O/Ws and
Suppressives and PTSs and how to find and run Service Facs. And at V
you review
the student and classify fully all lower grades. And at VI you teach
the student
all about R6 and how to do R6 EW and as the student moves to VII you
teach Power
Processing and give the student the final materials to go on to Clear
himself.
As I promised to do some time ago, that neats up all training
into a form
that can be firm, finally published in eventual book form, and which
puts the
stress on the most important data in auditing.
Parts of the mind, Codes, scales, other background data can be
woven into
the proper levels without overloading any.
Obviously then, you teach the student the theory in the
Certification
course and the drills and key processes for the grade in the
Classification
course of the .proper level.
This neats up both training and processing, releasing and
clearing.
This does not prohibit one from handling ARC Breaks or PTPs or
overts in
rudiments at any level, really. Handling a rudiment is just getting
the pc
going. It puts the heavy processes that handle ARC Breaks in life and
the past,
the problems, etc each in its proper level.
The rule applies that you must not overrun one of these heavy
grade
processes and must halt it the moment a free needle appears on it. Or
if the TA
goes out of it and it hasn't released the pc and hasn't been overrun
another
process can be run for that grade to handle the subject of that grade.
But I think you will find that the primary process of the grade
will do it
uniformly if well audited.
Here then is the additional data that belongs on your Gradation
Chart and
modernizes it.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
397
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
CORRECT
COLOUR FLASH
RED
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1965
Remimeo
All Scientology
Staff
All Students RELEASE GRADATION
ADDITIONAL DATA
(Supplements HCOB 22 Sept 65)
The Grades of Release as covered in HCOB 22 Sept 65 have been
named and
will be found, with auditor classes, in the ROUTING CHART of 26 Sept
65 being
issued with "Auditor 10" in October 65.
These Grades and names are final, and they designate what is to
be run on
the pc to obtain the various states of Release.
A table follows:
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Grade Name Materials Former Name
Where Done
Grade VIII Operating Thetan R1 Drills Operating Thetan
Saint Hill
Grade VII CLEAR Clearing Course Clear
Saint Hill
Solo
Grade VI Whole Track R6 EW Stage 4 Release
Saint Hill
Release Release
Solo
Grade VA Power Plus Added Power Stage 3 Release
Saint Hill by
Release Release Process
Class VII
Auditor
Grade V Power Release Power Processes 2nd Stage
Saint Hill by
Release Release
Class VIls
Grade IV Ability Release Service None
Saint Hill or
Release Facsimiles
HGC5-Any
Class IV or
above
Grade III Freedom Release R3H None
SH or HGCs
ARC Breaks Any
Class III
or above
Grade II Relief Release 0/W Processes None
SH or HGCs
Release Missed w/hs
Any Class II
Joburg
or above
Grade I Problems Release Probs Intensive None
SH or HGCs
Release Any Problems
Any Class I
Process
or above
Hidden Standards
Book of Case
Remedies
Grade 0 Communications Level 0 Processes Keyed-Out Clear
SM or HGCs
Release Release (0-0, 0-A, etc) Book I Clear
Any Class 0
or above
Ungraded Scientologist Assists of all None
Anywhere-any
types
Qualified
auditor or
Scientologist
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
It is obvious then that GRADE CERTIFICATES FOR PRECLEARS lapse
and are no
longer issued and are replaced by Release awards, awarding "Grade-
Release" when
attained.
398
It is also obvious that as these states all existed before they
were
discovered then REHABILITATION OF FORMER RELEASE is addressed to
rehabilitating
these grades. When rehabilitation is done and the state recovered for
the pc a
"Grade- Release" for the Grade actually recovered is issued.
The SAME rehabilitation processes as issued are used for every
type of
Release.
Preclears were sometimes released in more than one grade and
Former
Release is rehabilitated (and sold) for each grade the pc was formerly
released
on.
All grades formerly attained must each one in turn be found and
rehabilitated and each one is separately declared by Certs & Awards.
Therefore a
pc going release on a simple Qua! Division check out must be urged to
get a
rehabilitation as there may be other former release states there and
for anyone
rehabilitated as a former release many other grades (as per chart
above) are
available to be audited up to.
----------
REHABILITATION OF FORMER RELEASE
Technically you will find just these phenomena as given in the
Routing
Chart of Auditor 10 and the 22 Sept HCOB were the subjects of release.
Sometimes a pc was according to him released formerly on some
other
process or subject than those given on the Chart. You will however
find that it
relates to one of the Grade Subjects (Comm, Problems, 01W, ARC Brks,
Service
Facs, as the total of the Grades up to IV).
Example: Pc reads as Released on CCHs. OK, that was a Problems
or a Comm
Release. Why? It was because PC came to PT away from his problems of
the past or
because pc got into comm with the universe. Just decide which.
Example: Pc checks as Released on the button "Importance", run
in brackets
or concepts. This wasn't any Grade VI Release! It was probably
Problems that
were cleaned up or even O/Ws; therefore it was a Grade I or II.
You have to see which Release Grade it was and that's easy since
the pc
will tell you even without your asking that he "got over his ARC
Breaks" or "His
problems didn't worry him".
On old time processes, R2- 12, Rising Scale, even Engram
Running, the
point where Release was attained was because a Comm block, a Problem,
an 0/W, an
ARC Break cleaned up. It wasn't the old process that determines the
Grade the pc
was formerly released at so much as which of the Grade subjects were
relieved at
the time.
ERROR
The biggest error you can make in rehabilitation of a former
release is to
grade him too high and by-pass available charge for further releasing.
In the earlier grades you can go from Grade IV Release to Grade
0 Release
to Grade II, etc.
They are not entirely consecutive from 0 to IV. They are from V
up.
For instance you rehabilitate a pc as Grade II Release (overts
and
withholds) by standard rehab approach. He is then declared a Grade II
Release of
course. However he can be run on Comm Processes to obtain Grade 0
Release or on
Problems to obtain Grade I Release and better had be.
As we have formerly released so many on so many different
processes the
background for rehabilitation is ragged at this time.
New people can be moved up smoothly from Zero to IV. Older
Scientologists
will go up and down from Zero to IV.
You will find at times that somebody you are trying to audit to
a certain
Grade suddenly recalls being released at that Grade. The proper action
then is
rehabilitation of the Grade, not continuing to run the Grade.
399
All this is really quite simple.
The BIGGEST error is and will, continue to be not noticing a
state of
Release occurring while running a process and then overrunning it and
engulfing
it. You don't always see the free, floating needle-it is at times
brief.
NERVES
For a while auditors will be very nervy and err by under-running
processes
and failing to flatten them. Some auditors will see a floating needle
everywhere. Some will remain blind to them and grind on and on.
The thing to do is eventually find the happy medium. Don't under-
run or
overrun. Just notice when the process has produced a floating needle
and carry
on when it has not. And listen for those big pc upsurges in tone and
halt there.
And watch for the rising Tone Arm that goes to 5. Mostly it's an
overrun. But
some pcs who always were at 5 weren't ever formerly released and will
need Power
Processes to get them started. Power Processing also combines a lot of
lower
grade results also. But it is hard to Power Process pcs who have never
had lower
grade releasing. The Power Processing becomes very lengthy. However,
real tough
cases can't attain lower grade release states and so have to be Power
Processed
at once instead of after properly attaining the lower grades. These
"at once"
Power Process cases, who have had no former release grade are pretty
Suppressive. However, some pcs' Tone Arms can be at 5 and the pc can
act
Suppressive if it all stems from unnoticed lower Grade releasing that
was never
observed or rehabilitated.
It is interesting that a Grade V Release (Power Process) cannot
thereafter
be processed below his Grade. But this is a new set of processes. You
won't find
any Former Release Grade Vs. They just never made Grade V before, even
by
accident.
Grade VI Releases (R6 EW) don't easily respond thereafter to
Power
Processes. But remember, that's a Grade VI Release, not somebody who
came up
with a few bits of R6 EW.
You can't run a Grade VII (Clear) on anything but he can be
drilled on
getting about the universe and getting familiar with himself and what
he can do.
Grades VI and VII really cannot be successfully audited except
by oneself-
solo. If somebody else did audit them on a pc, the pc would not
prosper. He'd be
a fool and quite confused. These Grades (VI and VII) require
knowledge. Without
it it's pitiful. Auditors who have tried to audit raw meat pcs on
these Grades
have gotten into serious messes not with us but in their own
activities-all
stemming from trying to make a baby be vice president in six easy
lessons. Two
such auditors blew Scientology-they themselves had no real data or
release grade
or even case gain yet they tried to use VI materials on raw meat and
it all went
wrong and the pcs today mostly snarl and natter. Their way is barred
by their
antagonism.
It takes a real thetan to stand up to VI and VII. Ask somebody
who has
been there.
I trust these new Grades I found will help straighten out a lot
of things.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
400
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF l7 NOVEMBER 1969
Remimeo
Tech Secs
Qual Secs
Registrars
Franchises
GET THIS REMIMEOED AND ISSUED TO YOUR STAFF AT ONCE
URGENT-IMPORTANT
DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY SERVICES
This Policy Letter cancels:
HCO Policy Letter 5 May 1969 "Sub Zero Grades"
HCO Policy Letter 17 May 1969 "Dianetic Auditing
of Scientology Pcs"
HCO Policy Letter 26 Oct 1969 "Class VIII and HDG"
Dianetics is not a prerequisite for pcs to be audited on
Scientology
grades.
On the contrary. PCs CAN BE STARTED ON SCIENTOLOGY GRADES.
LRH ED 13 June 1969 states, "But mainly don't abandon any
Scientology
actions. Keep on doing these. Put somebody in charge of the Dianetics
Programme
and keep Scn going."
It is TRUE that pcs who are trying to handle psychosomatic
illnesses with
grades, wind up at "OT" still trying to cure a headache. But what is a
psychosomatic illness? What does that mean? Migraine headaches and
chronic
pains. How many pcs are like that? Only a small percentage.
It is TRUE that pcs who need medical treatment should get it and
then be
audited on Dianetics.
It is TRUE Dianetics handles aches and pains, accidents and
illness and is
a vital auditing tool.
BUT IT IS ALSO TRUE THAT A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF PCs CAN GO
STRAIGHT TO
SCIENTOLOGY GRADES.
Every test case of the original Dianetic programme was already a
Grade IV
or even VA release. This means Dianetics was done after Scientology
grades.
It is TRUE that a Class VI auditor also has to be an HDC. This
has been
policy for the last five or six years.
An HDC is not really a prerequisite for a Class Zero. It looks
that way on
the chart. It is true he'll be a better zero (or I, II, III, IV) if
he's first
an HDC. BUT IT ISN'T REQUIRED.
Many pcs find Dianetic auditing too steep a gradient and start
better on
level zero. When they are Grade IV they run fine on Dianetics and
Dianetic
Triples.
One way to do it is Scientology single grades, Dianetic triples,
Scientology triples.
An HAS or the lower level Sen basic courses start people off
great.
Now because you are being told you shouldn't drop any
Scientology actions
DON'T now drop all your Dianetic actions.
401
Follow LRH ED 16 TNT 13 June 1969. Put your Dianetic actions in
as a
Dianetic Programme under an appointed person and get on with the
Scientology
actions that never should have been dropped.
Sign up new people on this basis.
1. "If you have psychosomatic illnesses sign up for Dianetics.
We'll get
you examined by an MD and handle it."
2. "If you are not physically ill, sign up for Scientology."
A sick pc is channeled by the registrar and Tech Sec into
Dianetics.
A fairly healthy pc is channeled by the registrar and Tech Sec
direct into
Scientology grades.
On a pc who is signing up for Power, if earlier Sen results were
poor, put
the pc onto Dianetics as this is a hidden psychosomatic illness.
A healthy pc can go from Scn grades to Dianetics to Power.
A student can start on level zero. Or if the centre doesn't
teach levels
then he can go onto the Dianetics course.
If the Dianetics course is widely taught by groups and
Franchises most
students will already have had it when they get to an Academy or a
Saint Hill.
Really good auditors are good on Dianetics. If they can audit
Dianetics
they will be good Scn auditors. So it is a good point. The techniques
of
Dianetics are very simple and show up the auditor as good or poor. But
this
doesn't stop you from entering an applicant in an org straight onto
Academy Sen
courses.
Without creating any confusions or difficulties each and every
Org,
Centre, Franchise and group must get this implemented fast.
YOU CAN SIGN PEOPLE UP DIRECTLY FOR SCIENTOLOGY AUDITING OR
TRAINING-
Allowed Services Policy still applies.
Dianetics is designed to care for psychosomatically ill people
or to get
charge off a case before or during upper level actions.
The intention of the whole Dianetic programme was to reach out,
putting a
type of training in the field and to handle cases of psychosomatic
illness.
You can put a pc on Dianetic singles or triples anytime during
his
auditing career. It will have to be sometime but his physical
condition says
when. There is no other policy on this.
An auditor can be trained on Standard Dianetics anytime in his
career. The
only policy on this is that an auditor must be an HDG before Class VI
and every
VIII must be also an HDG. Dianetics training to HDC can be done in the
field if
the Supervisor is an Sen org HDG. Only official orgs can train to HDG.
Just like
it said on the Dn Graduation tape.
Don't now drop Dianetics. Get Scientology back IN.
Brian Livingston
LRH:BL:rs.hw.rd CS-l
Copyright ($) 1969 From notes by
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
402
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 MAY 1970
Remimeo
ALL TECH
AND QUAL URGENT
HATS IMPORTANT
SINGLE DECLARE
Multiple Declare
Cancelled
(This cancels HCO PL 6 Aug 1966, Declare,
Multiple, which permitted a pc to be run
from Grade 0 to IV and declare them all
at once.)
Policy: Only one grade of auditing may be declared or attested
to at one
time.
Many pcs have been found not to have attained the End Phenomena
of each
lower grade as per both the 1966 and 1968 Classification Charts.
Unless a pc directly attests the end phenomena to an Examiner
the Grade
cannot be awarded and the pc may not proceed.
The examiner is permitted to ask the end phenomena question for
that
grade. If the pc cannot attest he has attained it, he must be returned
to
session to have th-e process completed, additional processes of that
grade run.
The Triple Grade and its havingness is run.
There are many other processes for each grade which help attain
that End
Phenomena.
The condition has arisen where the lower grades have become
slighted in
orgs and the pG is not being set up well for a stable gain.
For instance Grade III can be repeated a dozen times.
The CCHs and others listed on the "Process Taught" Training
Column of the
1966 and 1968 Classifications Chart have become neglected YET ARE ALL
VALID FOR
THAT GRADE AND SHOULD ALL BE RUN, FOR A GRADE.
The Abilities Attained Column, Processing section of the 1966
and 1968
Classification Chart give the question that must be answered
positively before
the pc is let have the Grade or to have further grades.
The huge version of the Classification Chart should be
republished in a
huge format modified in text only as it extends upwards into OT
grades.
These Classification Charts, particularly the Column under
Training
"Processes Taught" and under Processing "Abilities Attained" are
valid.
"Processes Taught" should also appear as "Processes Used" under the
Processing
side. Other Class VI Processes may also be used to attain these
abilities.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE SEVERAL F/Ns PER GRADE.
It is Policy NOT to downgrade Scientology lower grades just for
the sake
of speed and Admin flows.
TRs (0 to 9) are curing some drug addicts.. They belong before
Dianetics.
Probably the main trouble orgs have had recently has come from
tossing
aside all Lower Grades. Thus the route to Total Freedom became
impeded.
The Multiple Declare PL and any other advice from anyone
permitting pcs to
escape direct attestation of lower grades and Power are NOT VALID AND
ARE
CANCELLED.
You will note that even the Multiple Declare PL (6 Aug 66) was
SH Only and
was intended only for rehabilitation of already run grades so Power
could be
run.
DON'T DOWNGRADE LOWER GRADES.
LRH:nt.rw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1970 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
403
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JULY 1962
Sthil
Student SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
The Saint Hill Special Briefing Course has certain distinct
purposes.
The course was begun to do two things:
1. To study and resolve training and education;
2. To assist people who wanted to perfect their Scientology.
There has been no change in these purposes.
The first is succeeding very well. The second is achieving world
wide
recognition through people who have been here.
OPERATING PRINCIPLES
The Scientologists studying here are supposed to concentrate on
only three
things:
(a) The acquisition of the ability to achieve a rapid and
accurate
understanding of data given to them for study and to put
that
material into effect;
(b) To achieve auditing results;
(c) To get a reality on the achieving of auditing results by
exact
duplication of current methodology and not by additives or
extraordinary solutions.
If a course attendee can achieve these things Classification is
inevitable. If all three things are not achieved, I refuse
Classification on
these grounds alone.
If an Instructor ever wants to know what he should be doing,
examine (a),
(b) and (c) above, regardless of any other policy or sheet. This is so
thoroughly the case that an Instructor should not feel called upon to
solve any
student's problem by any other action than referring the student to
the exact
bulletin, tape or policy letter or advices covering the question's
data, and by
checking out the student's data, drill or action in the three course
sections.
To do more is to defeat the course purposes for the students.
All student difficulties and even depressions and threatened
departures
stem not from failure to handle the student, but failure to get (a),
(b) and (c)
into exact and forceful effect.
The student who wants to know how to complete this course easily
need only
understand and perform (a), (b) and (e) above.
Every time a student violates one of the three requisites above,
I take
special note of it and even if the student's check sheets were crowded
with
passes, given enough violation of (a), (b) and (c) I will not finally
classify
that student, for to classify such a student would be an overt.
A student who never misses on the E-Meter, can do the standard
requirements of a session, gets fine results. Thus every time I see
(c) violated
I know that (a) has also been violated and act accordingly.
If I see a pc looking bad, I know that (a) has been violated and
(c) as
well and always find this to be the case every time I look into it.
The student should realize there is no "getting by" and no
"fair" grade on
this course. The Instructor who accepts less than perfect in all
Theory and
Drills and Auditing is setting up personal problems and blows. And the
student
who protests against perfect performance required is committing his
own subtle
suicide.
This is a tough course. Only become upset if it is anything less
than
tough. A lot of future depends on it.
LRH:dr.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
404
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 NOVEMBER AD 12
Sthil
CenOCon
PURPOSE OF THE SAINT HILL SPECIAL
BRIEFING COURSE
The purpose of the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course is first,
foremost
and Only to make Clearing Auditors.
Clearing the student is incidental to teaching the student.
This to some degree is a shift of emphasis. It is made to reduce
time
spent on course.
It is impractical to treat this course as an HGC as clearing can
be done
more easily off the course under less hurried conditions.
Were we to turn Saint Hill into an HGC Scientology would bog
down
everywhere.
I agree it is desirable to have a cleared auditor. It is also
true that
auditors' cases get in the way of auditing. It is also true that
clearing can
happen, is happening and will continue to happen without cleared
auditors.
At Saint Hill our responsibility is to train auditors.
It is the students' responsibility during and after Saint Hill
to get
clear.
By treating Saint Hill as an HGC, we could clear every student
present.
But also, by treating Saint Hill as an HGC we would bog down
Scientology
everywhere.
Training is hereafter limited to 16 weeks with one month's
extension in
special cases. Students are now arriving better prepared and the
clearing
technology being taught at Saint Hill is now standardized.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 MAY 1961
Sthil
STUDENT TRAINING
AUDITING HAS PRIORITY
Auditing the student in the Saint Hill briefing takes priority
over all
other activities.
No auditing period assigned may be postponed or altered for any
reason
such as training, giving assessments to others, etc.
LRH:jl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
405
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 OCTOBER 1961
Svhil
Briefing Course
only
EXAMINATIONS
(Effective until further notice)
Beginning October 23rd, 1961, all students are expected to pass
five
examinations per week.
In the event that a student does not pass five examinations in a
week his
or her daytime processing (but not evening) will be omitted the
following week.
There is no limit on the number of examinations a student can
have and
fail or pass. However, a student seeking to learn the examination by
continually
taking it will, on such finding, be given a special examination at the
discretion of the examiner.
The whole effort of this proceeding is to raise auditing skill
by raising
auditing knowledge. And if a person cannot keep up with his studies,
his or her
processing is omitted to give him or her more time to study, as it is
obviously
lacking.
It may not be a sin to audit to a lose. But it's surely one not
to know
and be able to communicate the data of how to do it correctly,
particularly
after being at Saint Hill.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:imj.cden
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 OCTOBER 1961
Sthil
NEW STUDENTS SEC CHECK
All new students arriving at Saint Hill shall .be given an
appropriate
Form 7 before final acceptance on course.
An Instructor is to administer it.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ph.rd
406
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 DECEMBER 1961
Assn Secs
HCO Secs
SAINT HILL TRAINING
CANDIDATES FROM ORGANIZATIONS
Persons being sent by organizations (Central Orgs, City Offices)
to Saint
Hill for training should be selected on the basis of:
1. Past Training. The more the better.
2. Seniority. Must have been with the org a long time.
3. Contract. Must be under long term contract to work with the
org on
return-2 years.
4. Executive status. Must have had and successfully held
executive
status.
5. Auditing Record. Must have had a good record as an auditor.
----------
It takes a lot of hard work at Saint Hill on my part, Mary Sue's
and the
Instructors to make auditors Out of those sent.
In four cases, the student sent felt he wanted no training
really, only
the Importance of it.
In all persons sent, no visible signs of any prior sec checking
could be
found. Their Joburgs (Form 3), Form 6 and Childhood Form had no signs
of ever
having been done.
To get an organization person to Saint Hill and home again with
any
despatch, the organization should, on that person before leaving for
Saint Hill:
1. Get a Joburg (Form 3) FLAT.
2. Get a Form 6 FLAT.
3. Get a Childhood Sec Check FLAT.
4. Get E-Meter Essentials 100% perfect.
5. Get the TRs FLAT.
These items are taking the most time. Then we can get the person
back
sooner.
Without these and a Problems Intensive, general 0/W and ARC
Process 61 all
flat, a student cannot be assessed accurately or easily.
I must pass on, well in advance, any application to send a
person to Saint
Hill and I must have:
1. Evidence of the above.
2. The person's auditing record.
3. The person's folder (synopsis of) as a pc.
----------
Any reason for a City Office's or a Central Org's difficulty in
making it,
if any, is howlingly evident in the Joburg and Form 6 Sec Checks we do
on them,
and in their general low level of skill in handling meters, TRs and
Model
Session. It's pretty wild. It's a 'How on earth can you walk?'
attitude here.
It's that bad as seen in their Sec checks and basic skills. You can
improve this
by stressing Class II and you should.
And before you send anyone to Saint Hill, cover essentials,
please.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:esc.bp.cden
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
407
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 DECEMBER 1961
Sthil
TRAINING ACTIVITIES
(Effective at once)
Students: A student on arrival will be assisted in finding quarters,
will be
given a Sec Check and will be assigned to auditing in Class II skills
in a
common room.
As soon as proficient at Sec Checking and other Class II skills
and has
been classified, the student will be permitted to assess a 3D under
supervision.
Regardless of classification when a student has received in the
common
room all preparatory steps as a case to be assessed, the student will
receive a
3D assessment and run.
Conditions of departure: When the student has passed examinations for
Class II
and has received a 3D assessment and has been run on it sufficiently
to secure
his case from relapse, he or she may be considered course completed.
The student
may or may not classify for Class III award on departure.
Instructors: There will be an instructor in charge of the common room
who will
supervise all basic auditing.
There will be an instructor in charge of all bulletin and tape
studies and
examinations.
There will be a case supervision instructor for 3D assessments
and runs.
This instructor does 3D item checks and incoming Sec Checks.
Administrator: There will be an administrator who will answer all
correspondence, see to all room bookings, preparation of student
packets and
mimeos, care of auditing room assignments, case folders, student
messages and
related matters.
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:esc.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
408
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1962
CenOCon
RESTRICTION ON SAINT HILL AREA
(Amends HCO Pol Ltr of 20 December 1960, same title)
It is laid down as a general policy that no professional auditor
shall set
up a full time Scientology practice, or remain in active full time
practice,
within a radius of 20 miles of Saint Hill.
This is now specifically intended to apply to auditing of
whatever kind
within this area.
If any auditor has a good and valid reason for auditing within
this
geographical area, he or she should seek prior permission and approval
from me
in writing, informing me fully of the circumstances which make it
necessary.
No such auditing may be done without my prior permission and
approval.
Permission will not be unreasonably denied to bona fide auditors
who are
in good standing with HCO.
This also applies to Saint Hill Briefing Course Students on
other than
fellow students.
LRH:jw.rcl L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard [Note: The amendment was the
addition
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED of the last five
paragraphs.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1962
Sthil
3D CRISS CROSS ITEMS
All items found by 3D Criss Cross must be checked out for
consistent read
by an Instructor before being placed on a pc's Line Plot.
The item must be checked out by the pc's auditor first as usual
before
being checked out by an Instructor.
A~ Instructor is only to see if Item reads consistently on meter
and to
instruct student appropriately if it does not. The Instructor is not
to find the
correct item but direct that it be found.
Completeness of list is not to be otherwise checked or checked
separately.
LRH:sf.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
409
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1962
Sthil
HCO Secs
Assoc Secs
SAINT HILL RETREADS
(Amends HCO Pol Ltr of December 19, 1961)
If a student has exceeded eight weeks initially on the Saint
Hill Special
Briefing Course, he or she must pay for weeks of retread, if returning
to Course
for further training, at the rate of ~50.00 or � 18.0.0 per week,
which is half
the weekly cost of the original course.
When a student has been terminated he or she has the right to
extend by
paying the weekly retread fee from the date of termination.
LRH:sf.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The amendment is the addition of the last
paragraph. - Ed.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 MARCH 1962
Sthil
STAFF TRAINING
HCO WW qualified Scientologists will be rotated through the
Special
Briefing Course, one month at a time unless individual protests are
made.
It is my aim to get all qualified personnel a full Class II at
this time.
This can only be done by actual course attendance. Pay is not
affected.
This also gives me an opportunity to give course instruction
personnel a
break and get them their classifications as well as administrative
experience.
An Income Division personnel should be acquired to give us the
extra
person needed.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
410
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 JULY 1962
Sthil
COURSE ROTATION
Saint Hill staff will not now be rotated through the course.
Instead, Reg Sharpe has signified he will check them out on HCO
Bulletins,
Tapes and Practical.
Further, we are looking for a Class III Auditor to clear Saint
Hill staff.
LRFI:dr.cden.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East. Grinstead, Sussex
Sthil HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JULY 1962
Sthil Staff
Jnstructors
MIMEO AND MAGAZINE DISTRIBUTION, STHIL
COURSE
All HCO Bulletins and Information Letters issued, and any Policy
Letter
marked Sthil, Student, go to instructors and students, one copy to
each. There
are no excepted HCO Bulletins or Information Letters in this regard.
A supply of HCO Bulletins but not Information Letters are given
to the
Theory Supervisor in the training office.
The Theory Supervisor should inform Mimeo routinely each week of
the
number of students on course and instructors and the extra bulletins
needed.
This order back dates to the last six HCO Bulletins issued.
OFFICE, DOMESTIC AND GROUNDS STAFF
Office, Domestic Staff and Grounds Staff receive one copy each
into their
baskets of all Policy Letters marked "Sthil" but no others, and one
copy each of
every Information Letter issued, and one copy each of every Certainty
to be
mailed.
SCIENTOLOGY STAFF
Scientologists on staff receive, into their baskets, one copy
each of
every Policy Letter and every HCO Bulletin, every PAB and every
Certainty.
LRH BASKETS
I receive one copy of everything issued by mimeo or mailed by
reception.
----------
There are no exceptions or further issues than the above.
LRH:dr.cden.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
411
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
(Re-issued from Washington DC)
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1962
Issue II
CenOCon
SAINT HILL GRADUATES
This is repeated policy on the subject of Saint Hill Graduates
and
Administration and an extension of that Policy.
No Saint Hill Graduate may be used in an Administrative
position. Amongst
administrative positions are included those of Director of Training
and Director
of Processing.
A Saint Hill Graduate may be a Technical Director to an
Organisation only
until such time as the individual skill of the various auditors in the
Organisation is improved to a point of high effectiveness. After that
point is
reached it will require special permission from me personally before
Saint Hill
Graduates may be continued on the post of Technical Director.
I will not grant permission for a Saint Hill Graduate to be used
as
Director of Processing or Director of Training at this time.
If a Saint Hill Graduate is occupying the post of Organisation
Secretary
or Association Secretary this post must be combined with a certain
amount of
auditing, namely goals checkouts.
The auditing of a Saint Hill Graduate may not be sold as such
for the
entirety of an auditing course.
The activity of a Saint Hill Graduate at this time in any
Central
Organisation shall be related entirely and Strictly to the finding of
goals,
either as Staff Goal Finder or HGC Goal Finders. There will be no
relaxation of
this policy.
At once if above policy is being violated in any way, reorganise
your
staff to comply.
A Saint Hill Graduate may not be used to list goals on someone
aside from
the few goals listed in the term of a Dynamic Assessment. Nor may a
Saint Hill
Graduate be used to list items on a preclear after goals are found.
These
actions must be undertaken (the listing of the first 850 goals and the
listing
of items on multiple lines to the state of clear) by qualified HCAs
only.
For the time being until further notice no Saint Hill Graduate
is
considered other than a Goals Finder and a Class III auditor is
qualified to
find goals on a temporary status of Class IV until such time as he or
she has
proved himself or herself as a goals finder and the class is confirmed
or has
not proven himself or herself as a goals finder.
These policies are the result of numerous conditions and
omissions that
have come to my attention in recent weeks wherein Saint Hill Graduates
are being
used wastefully and where clearing is not being made to progress and
where
Organisations are not giving any attention at all to clearing in its
furthest
finest sense for HGC preclears and Staff Members.
Other Policies of similar date or near date cover Staff Clearing
Programmes and will cover HGC Clearing.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
412
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1962
Sthil
Students
CO-AUDIT UNIT
Those terminated from the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course may
join the
Co-audit Unit, listing their goals to clear.
They keep usual class schedule in auditing but attend no other
classes.
One of themselves is to be in charge of the Unit and will be
known as the
Auditor-in-Charge of Co-audit. This carries no pay.
Reg has volunteered to pass them on bulletins if they will study
evenings.
They may be admitted to lectures and TV demonstrations.
They are not otherwise enrolled, are no longer bound by course
regulations, and may depart when they like or when terminated from the
Co-audit.
From the state of those in the field whose goals were not listed
to clear
before departure, I would say this action, done here, is very
desirable.
Once having departed from the Co-audit, after an absence of one
week, the
student may not return to course or Co-audit without enrolling on a
retread
basis.
A member of the Co-audit may find goals on pcs outside Co-audit
hours for
classification.
There is no folder supervision on the Co-audit except by the
Auditor-in-
Charge.
CLASSIFICATION
Those who have found a goal on another, have their own goal and
have
completed check sheets on departure from course or the Co-audit will
be
classified as Class IV.
Those who have had their own goal found and have completed the
check
sheets designed by HCO Board of Review will be awarded Class III.
There are no other designations now except in special cases at
my
discretion. All students not classified are otherwise given a Course
Incomplete.
Those who left without my permission are designated as Departure
Unauthorized.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[See also HCO P/L 2 October 1962, Termination & Classification,
page 41].
413
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1962
Issue II
Sthil Students
PAY FOR GOALS FINDING
If a Co-audit ex-student is finding goals for classification,
any received
pay for the auditing renders the finding invalid so far as
Classification is
concerned.
In short, paid-for auditing does not count toward the goals
necessary for
Classification.
LRH:dr.cden.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1962
Central Orgs
Franchise
SAINT HILL BRIEFING COURSE
TERMINATIONS
When a student is terminated from Course he or she comes under
the HCO
Board of Review for classification. Then follows a provisional period
whilst the
student's progress and results on Course are reviewed.
The following is pertinent to classification: state of Check
Sheet,
student's own case, results of student as an auditor.
Further, during the provisional period students will go into the
Co-audit
group where their auditing ability and case advancement will be
further
reviewed.
No student will be classified until his/her case is in good
shape.
Issued by: Reg Sharpe
HCO Board
of Review
for
L. RON
HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
414
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 OCTOBER 1962
CenOCon
Sthil
TERMINATION & CLASSIFICATION
(Clarifies but does not change HCO Policy Letters of
Sept 20 and Sept 28, 1962 and changes all previous
Policy Letters on Classification including Policy Ltr
of Sept 20 AD 12.)
Classifications and designations given at Saint Hill are as
follows:-
Class IV with Honours-check sheets complete, student clear, three
goals found on
others (including refound goals).
Class IV-check sheets complete, new first goal found on another by
Dynamic
Assessment, goal found on self and proven by listing.
Class Ill-check sheets complete, goal found on self and proven by
listing, good
case condition.
Course Completion-complete check sheets.
Course Incomplete-incomplete check sheets or too many infractions on
record.
Departure Unauthorized-incomplete check sheets, case in poor
condition,
permission to leave not granted by myself personally.
Complete Check Sheets
A student must have complete cheek sheets for any
classification.
Goal Found on Self
The goal found on self must be proven by listing to be the goal.
In some cases this may be extended, for political, auditing or
case
reasons, to the second or even the third goal.
It is almost certain, in a matter of too many infractions and
especially
infraction of Rule 28, to refuse classification on the basis of only
one goal
found on self.
Goals Found on Others
A fresh first goal must have been found on the pe, not refound,
to award a
Class IV in addition to the other requirements above.
This goal (or goals) must prove out by listing. If a goal fails
to prove
out, it does not count and, if Classification has been granted on the
basis of
it, the Classification may be reduced.
Judgment
Certain leeway may be granted by the HCO Board of Review and
myself in the
requirements of Classification. As turning out a bad auditor will be
an overt on
many pcs this leeway is more likely to be advanced than relented. More
requirements may be asked than the above for Classification or Course
Completion
to assure us of actual skill or case condition.
415
Co-Audit Status
Termination means in fact that the student has passed out of the
course
but under HCO for the purposes of completion of requirements, excess
requirements or examination. As no further meeting of requirements may
now be
undertaken after the student has left this vicinity, it is very
advisable to
complete all classification requirements before departure, as the
classification, dictated by the above policies and judgment, will be
that
student's classification until retreaded at Saint Hill.
Termination
Termination does not mean Classification.
A student may be terminated from the Course and transferred to
the Co-
Audit Unit (see HCO Policy Letters of 20 Sept and 28 Sept 1962) at any
time
after he or she has completed 16 weeks on course. Any additional weeks
are
granted by special permission.
Extension of time after sixteen weeks is by opinion of Mary Sue
Hubbard
and Instructors and must be finally granted by myself, but only if
requested by
Mary Sue and/or Instructors.
There are two conditions of continuation:
(a) continuation at additional fee per week and,
(b) continuation without charge.
Students who are doing badly, and especially those who have many
infractions, should fall under (a) above. Those who have been doing
well and are
without many infractions are ordinarily considered, if continued by
request of
Mary Sue and/or Instructors, under (b) above.
Termination is not otherwise governed by rules, but is
influenced by the
state of the Course, the state of the student's skill, the state of
the
student's case, and other factors.
The fact of Termination does not determine Classification.
Classification
is a matter of the HCO Board of Review and my own determination.
That Termination has occurred guarantees no award or
Classification.
A period after termination is necessary to establish the
student's status
by consolidation of records and a review or examination.
All records relating to the student, upon Termination, must be
forwarded
to the HCO Board of Review by Instructors, with a recommendation from
the
Supervisor of each Section and from Mary Sue. No Classification may
now be
awarded unless these recommendations exist and are in the hands of the
HCO Board
of Review.
It is the responsibility of the student that his or her records
are
complete and in the hands of the HCO Board of Review, including
recommendations.
Mary Sue's or Instructor's Recommendations exist only if it is
felt the
student should be classified. Absence of recommendation can mean that
no-
classification will be awarded.
LRH:jw.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
416
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 OCTOBER 1962
Sthil
ROOMS, EMPTYING FOR CLEANING
Study rooms, the Pavilion, Chapel and Basement, must be emptied
of all
students by the respective Supervisors in person at the exact end of
period at
the end of the day.
Cleaning cannot be accomplished unless this is done.
Students are expected to be out of these rooms at 6.30 on the
dot. Earlier
periods get no extension time, why the last period of the day?
Provision for students eating supper in may be made but may not
include
the Theory Room, Pavilion or Chapel or areas that must be cleaned.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 OCTOBER 1962
Sthil
Z UNIT
CASE REVIEW
In view of the fact that auditors leaving here will be auditing
without
supervision, it is necessary that their judgment on clearing cases be
increased.
Therefore, there will be no more daily supervision of Z Unit
folders.
Instead, there will be a weekly or bi-weekly interview of the
preclear and
his or her auditor at which time the folder will also be reviewed.
In the meanwhile the auditor in Z Unit should be guided by the
needs of
the case and applicable bulletins and lectures.
This also serves to provide me with better data on the progress
of each
case as the interview will result in a written summary.
The auditor is responsible for the case in front of him or her
in the
session. In the Z Unit this will be the primary point of adjudication
in
classification. Did the auditor handle the case according to its needs
in
clearing?
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
417
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 OCTOBER 1962
Issue II
Sthil
CO-AUDIT SUSPENDED
The HCO Policy Letter creating the Co-audit of the Saint Hill
Special
Briefing Course is cancelled herewith.
Those auditors now on the Co-audit will be returned to course.
The auditing quarters used by the Co-audit will become part of
the Z Unit.
Auditors who were on the Co-audit should return to regular class
schedule.
Future terminations will end the student's time at Saint Hill.
The reason for this change is the slump in auditing formality by
some
auditors and the lack of progress of some cases.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 NOVEMBER AD 12
Sthil Course
Only
DEPARTURE FORM
(HCO WW Form Dep/1)
Instructions: This form must be completed by a student before Any
Departure
from the Course. To fail to fill it out is to risk being published as
Departure
Unauthorized, and could mean as well certificate suspension in extreme
cases.
Route in the order below by ordinary despatch lines. Do not bring a
body with
it. Mark out the first line if it is being requested by the student.
Where a student is to be terminated Without request, this form
is
circulated by the course supervisor. In which case the Course
Supervisor marks
out the request permission line.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
418
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
BLUE ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
FORM Dep/1
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
This student is being terminated.
I herewith request permission to leave course on
(date)___________________
because________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Name____________________________________________ Date
Requested_________________
THEORY SUPERVISOR I do (do not) advise the
classification of
this student
because_______________________
___________________________________________
Theory Classification
Completed____________________
Initial_____________
PRACTICAL SUPERVISOR I do (do not) advise the
classification of
this student because
______________________
___________________________________________
Practical Classification
Completed____________________
Initial_____________
AUDITING SUPERVISOR I do (do not) advise the
classification of
this student because
______________________
___________________________________________
Auditing Classification
Completed____________________
Initial_____________
COURSE SUPERVISOR I do (do not) advise the
classification of
this student because
_____________________
__________________________________________
Classification Completed_____________
Initial____________
HCO BOARD OF REVIEW I do (do not) advise the
classification of
this student because
_____________________
______________________
Initial____________
L. RON HUBBARD I hereby authorize the following
classifica
tion Class ________ and
termination.
I do not authorize
departure______________
STUDENT I accept the above classification
or lack
of it
because_____________________________
__________________________________________
I withdraw notice of
departure____________
__________________________________________
Form must be sent to:
COURSE ADMINISTRATOR I have issued (have not issued)
Classifica
tions to this
student.____________________
FILE
Initial
419
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Sthil HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 NOVEMBER 1962
CenO
TERMINATIONS FROM THE SHSBC
To Saint Hill Instructors:
Terminations will now be done on a time basis with
classification matched
to check sheets and accomplishment.
The essence here is-don't try to make an OT all in one course.
The criteria of an extra month beyond 16 weeks is established by
whether
the student has a chance to go clear in that month and by no other
consideration. The slow student has had it at the end of sixteen
weeks.
In this way we will make more progress. The slow student can
return home,
use what he or she knows, make some case progress and then return for
a retread.
The bulk of students leaving here get large ease improvements at home.
Therefore
their next retread period will count. The fast student will probably
go clear
and more instruction will be available to help him or her do so.
These changes are dictated by increased effectiveness of
terminology,
minimal check sheet changes and by our limited space. I feel we can
accomplish
our job with a student now in 16 weeks if we really bear down.
Students are
arriving well briefed in most cases. Our job gets easier as we ship
students out
and technology accordingly rises in orgs and the field.
I am also about to condense most of their study tapes into
bulletins which
will save them time.
Your job is to bear down hard to get them looking good by the
end of
sixteen weeks and getting good results.
LRH:gl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 NOVEMBER 1962
CenOCon
Franchise
Field
SAINT HILL RETREAD FEE
The retread fee for Saint Hill Special Briefing Course is 50% of
the
regular course fee.
A retread is sixteen weeks long.
Weekly retread fees are discontinued.
Once terminated, a student may only retread.
There are no special arrangements for retread or less time
offered.
There is no time interval specified before a retread can be had.
Acceptance of retread on the course follows routine channels
just as in
original enrollment.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
420
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 DECEMBER 1962
Sthil
V UNIT
NEW STUDENTS
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
(Effective December 3, 1962)
The V Unit is hereby created. It is also called the "2-12 Co-
Audit".
The new students' time is more or less wasted up to the moment
they have
had a ease gain on R2-12.
In times past, when we didn't have 2-12, we found they couldn't
learn very
much in their first many weeks.
If they can't learn well until they've had some 2-12, why are we
trying to
teach them 2-12? Our only salvation on this is just make them do 2-12.
I can take any group even raw meat and make them audit the most
esoteric
processes. Just put their hands on the controls and tell them to fly.
And they
will, so long as an Instructor is there to take responsibility for the
mass
sessions.
Therefore, with this policy letter, we abolish all pre-2-12
training
including training on 2-12. There is no pre-auditing check sheet for
running
2-12.
Under the supervision of the Unit Supervisors the new (or
students who
have not had 2-12 here excepting the Z Unit) students are put on full
time
auditing on 2-12. Hand them the bulletins referring to it but don't
attempt any
check out. No practical drills. No lectures or group briefing.
Just put them into teams and crowd them into doing it. When they
don't
know what to do next, they contact the unit supervisor and he tells
them. And
make them get 2-12 done.
Of course Saint Hill Instructors' confidence in a new enrollee
is low. But
this mustn't stand in the road of getting 2-12 done.
We are up against this proposition: before being run on 2-12 the
student's
learning rate is shockingly low. Training the student to run 2-12 is
therefore a
waste of time. However, the student must be run on 2-12. The saving
grace lies
in the virtue of 2-12 itself which gets valuable gains even .when run
clumsily,
so long as it is run more or less muzzled. The solution therefore is
to get 2-12
run without preliminary training but under the heavy supervision of
the Unit
Supervisors.
What space is used? Any space that can be pressed into service.
(Town and
Country Planning disallows use of the top floor.) The far end of the
Pavilion
could be used until the new building is built as Practical will get
smaller for
a while.
What time periods should be used? Two periods of 3 hours each
every day.
The idea is this: the student is enrolled with the usual steps
and is at
once put to 2-12 full time. No further preliminaries, no check sheet,
just a
handful of bulletins, a meter, ballpoint, paper, a pc and a place to
audit.
As soon as List 1 and List IA are checked out clean of reaction,
the
student is placed in W Unit and his training proceeds exactly
according to
existing pattern. The bulletins, tapes and drills of 2-12 are passed
as part of
the usual classes before Z Unit is entered.
Do not place one examination or requirement prior to doing 2-12
in the V
Unit except enrolment.
Do not be diffident in making new students get this auditing
done. And let
nothing stand in the way of actual accomplishment of Clean List One
and One A.
'The Tiger Drill is a luxury. Ordinary Elimination works if the
student
can't T.D.
Supervisors are to check out RIs before they are opposed and
lists when
they are pronounced clean by the student. Any list which is found not
to be
clean is greeted with a 200 word infraction.
We can do this. Anything else puts us into the old merry-go-
round of slow
students and slow-gains, no-gains.
LRH:dr.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
421
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 DECEMBER 1962
Org Secs
HCO Secs
Franchise for
Info
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
The number of students on this course in January AD 13 will be
about a
score.
In November 25 students were released to Orgs and areas to help
get
clearing going in the field. These are excellent auditors. One of them
his first
week in London cleaned up a hang-fire case and found two goals. The
field and
Orgs needed these people.
On the 21st of December we are releasing almost another score,
fully
versed in Routine 2-12, 3GAXX and R3-2l.
We have begun to turn out auditors more rapidly. As we start
them off
their first day now on R2- 12 and abolish their chronic PTPs, they
then learn
much faster and graduate sooner.
We will teach students now in from 16 to 20 weeks so you can
send us
people and get them back as experts.
Our Instructors are seven in number plus the Course
Administrator.
Clearing anywhere is held up only for lack of Saint Hill
graduates. The
HGC doing the most clearing has the most Saint Hill graduates.
The time to enroll a student is January and February. The summer
rush
starts in after that.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.cden
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
422
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 DECEMBER AD 12
Sthil Students
Academies
TRAINING
SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
SUMMARY OF SUBJECTS
BY UNITS
Please delete on Check Sheets any and all Tapes, HCO Bulletins
and drills
that lie outside these outlined subjects. This is a streamlining for
the 16 week
course. We assume now that the student can do old Model Session and a
Problems
Intensive of sorts when he or she enrolls. If not we will still omit.
V UNIT
Nothing but Co-auditing. No Cheek Sheets beyond Course
Regulations.
Heavily supervised R2-1O or R2-l2 directed toward Results.
Basis for promotion to next unit-Clean List One on the student
and has
gotten startling results on a pc. No other basis for promotion. No
time limit in
unit. Any study time is spent on W Unit Check Sheets in Theory and
Practical.
W UNIT
Theory-Usual beginning course fundamentals, but Only GF Model
Session.
Lots of B's on Mid Ruds, Big Mid Ruds and Meter, TRs, havingness,
CCHs, also HCO
Bulletin December 8, AD 12. Assists.
Practical-TRs, Meter, GF MS only, CCHs. Assists.
The student must not be dragged out forever in this unit and be
made to
study very hard in it as it is without auditing. This is a Sweat it
through in a
hurry unit. If student fails to get 5 passes each in Theory and
Practical per
week, is dropped to V Unit as low passes would clearly indicate more
gains were
indicated in the V Unit.
When Check Sheets for this Unit complete, goes to X Unit.
X UNIT
Theory-Everything relative to R2-12. More data on Mid Ruds.
Tiger Drilling
and Big Tiger.
Practical-All R2- 12 Practical. Any drills omitted in W Unit.
Tiger
Drilling and Big Tiger.
Auditing-Rudiments, Missed Withholds and havingness. See HCO
Bulletin
December 8, AD 12.
Basis for promotion to Y Unit-Check Sheets complete plus
auditing
requirement of being able to clean a pc's needle, get missed W/Hs and
get a pc's
havingness process.
Y UNIT
Theory-Everything relative to finding goals and clearing.
3GAXX, Routine 3-21, etc. HCO Bulletins on Wrong Goals, etc.
423
Practical-All Clearing practical, free needle, etc.
Auditing-Routine 2-12 and CCHs. Assists. Prepchecking.
Requirements for promotion to next unit, to smooth out a pc's
line plot
and pilot a pc through R2-12 with no difficulties because of dirty
needle,
incomplete lists, overlooking RSing Items, etc.
Line plot of pc must contain no by-passed Items, needle must be
elean and
specified lists wholly nul.
Z UNIT
Theory-Additional clearing data. Form of the course. Scientology
plans.
Practical-Review of drills, TRs.
Auditing Requirements-Goal found on self, goal found on pc with
all Check
Sheets complete, gives Class IV. If Successfully up to date with all Y
Unit
Check Sheets and requirements passed, Class III.
if successful in auditing requirements of Y Unit but only up to
X Check
Sheets complete, Class II.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 FEBRUARY 1963
Sthil
info D of Ts
CURRICULUM CHANGE
The following change in auditing for Units will go into effect
Monday
February 11th, 1963.
Y UNIT
Y Unit will revert to Missed Withholds and Prepchecking and will
complete
a Goals Prepcheck. All Y Unit auditing will be meterless, specializing
in the
observation of the pc, particularly coloration and apparent age.
Theory and practical for this Unit will specialize on R3-MX.
---------
Any 2-12A cycle now in progress in Y may be completed by the
current
class.
R2-12A will be struck from all check sheets as fast as replaced
by R3-MX
data.
R2- 1 2A will be done in V Unit only.
Routine 3-MX only will be done in Z Unit.
LRH:gl.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
424
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 FEBRUARY 1963
BPI
SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS
Students attending the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course will
hereafter
be terminated and returned only when clear.
As this action, by current technology, is not a lengthy process,
(only
very exact), it is not anticipated that the course length forecast of
16-20
weeks will suffer any great change.
Current students are being held to complete this desirable goal.
New
students are some of them even now being cleared in the V unit before
actually
beginning course.
Any retread student is acceptable on course and can be promised
now to
begin getting clear the first week on course. Retread is forecast as
eight weeks
where the student has his goal already.
The Practical Section has been strengthened to ensure accuracy
and fast
passage. The Theory Section is being simplified as all materials are
being
converted rapidly to the exact needs of auditing and clearing.
Saint Hill is gearing up for a busy spring and summer. We now
have around
sixty students and seven supervisors and instructors. Most of these
students
will have graduated, cleared, in March or April. We have only two
"hung up"
students who have not been able to pass course requirements over a
long period,
and these are both of them now being cleared and should be first goal
clears by
March.
Morale level on the course has never been higher, Saint Hill
staff is
clearing itself on a co-audit basis and all should be first goal
clears by mid
spring.
You may have been waiting for Saint Hill to start producing
clears on an
everyone basis.
This is now successfully in progress amongst students and
instructors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
425
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 FEBRUARY 1963
Sthil Students
AUDITING REGULATIONS
In auditing done on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, no
matter what
unit, the following regulations must be observed:
1. Ignorance of the student auditor of the rules of the process
he is
doing shall not be taken into account in any or all
instances where a
case is mishandled, gotten into difficulty or audited over a
long
period with no gain, and disciplinary measures will be taken
without
any attention to the student's lack of information.
2. Any student auditor, whether or not examined and passed on a
technique, but doing that technique on a fellow student, and
failing
to achieve a result with that technique in a reasonable
time, shall be
transferred to W Unit, and shall have no auditing for two
weeks.
3. Case responsibility shall be exclusively with the auditor
and no plea
that contrary data was given by an instructor or other
person shall
act as a defence in the event of case worsening or case
difficulty.
4. if a student blows session it is wholly his or her current
auditor's
responsibility to retrieve that student.
5. A student receives auditing only so long-as he or she gives
good
auditing.
6. A breach of the Auditor's Code by a student auditor just
before or in
session shall be deemed a misdemeanor.
7. Infractions for breach of auditing regulations may be
recommended by
instructors but may be given only by the Course Supervisor;
the
procedure being for the Instructor to pass the Infraction
Sheet to the
Course Supervisor for decrease, increase, cancellation or
delivery to
the student for the student's compliance.
8. Penalties are as follows:
(a) Failure to comply with instructions which failure might
have resulted
in slowing or worsening a case: 200 ..to 500 word
Infraction Sheet.
(b) Departure from standard operating procedure SHSBC in any
unit: 200
word Infraction Sheet to 2 weeks in Unit W.
(c) Worsening or drawing out the auditing on a case: 2 weeks in
Unit W to
Being Sent Down.
(d) Accumulation of 5,000 words in Infraction Sheets, in which
2 weeks
re-assignment to Unit W shall constitute 1,500 words: No
Classification during current course.
----------
These Regulations for Auditing are issued at a time when 2-12A,
Rudiments
and Havingness, a Prepcheck, and 3-MX are all of them highly
specialized and
standardized with precise rules which if exactly followed, give
excellent case
gains. Only departure from the standard methods of these processes can
fail to
achieve case gains.
As the data is easily available, departures from the rules of
procedure
shall be interpreted as an attempted overt against the course and the
pc and
will be dealt with as such.
Such strenuous regulations and their strenuous application are
necessary
if students-and you-are to leave here clear.
LRH:gl.rd L RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
426
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1963
Sthil
Academies
V UNIT
(Modifies earlier Policy Letters)
The purpose of V Unit is to:
1. Get the student into some kind of shape to finish the course.
2. Give the student a win as an auditor.
3. Establish an auditing reality on Scientology.
NEW STUDENT'S CASE
If a new student has been badly audited previously it is up to V
Unit to
smooth the case out. An Elementary Prepcheck "In auditing......" can
be used.
If the new student is a Rockslammer great care must be taken to
get a 2-
12A 4 RI Package on the Rockslamming Item. List One Issue 3 is used.
The new
student is not made to complete the list. The biggest RS is found,
determined as
Term or Oppterm, and used. No RSes less than 1/3 of a dial wide are
used in 2-
12A.
If the new student has been run on a wrong goal, an "On
Goals..........."
Prepcheck or "On the goal (wrong goal)...............", should be
applied.
These are the only processes used in V Unit. The Instructor must
not get
inventive or embark upon R3 or start opposing RR RIs:
1. The Assist Type Repetitive Prepcheck using Suppress and
Invalidate buttons
only for a specific period of time contained in the command "Since-
............
2. Missed withholds. The elementary "What have we failed to find
out about
you". "Auditors". "I".
3. A broad prepcheck aimed at remedying messed up auditing. "On
Auditing
............ " or "In Auditing............... " followed by the
buttons of Big Mid
Ruds or the 18 buttons.
4. ARC Straight Wire (never accepting "Yes" only for an answer,
please). Used
on a pc who is spinny or neurotic or feels bad.
5. General 0/W.
6. 2-l2A using List One Issue 3,4 RI Pkg. Or a case repair on 2-12
or 2-12A
that has been done incorrectly elsewhere.
7. Wrong goal on a pc who has had a wrong goal run. 18 button
Repetitive
Prepcheck "On the coal................" or appropriate wording.
The V Unit new student must emerge from V Unit in better case
condition
than when entering it, and not a Rockslammer. These are the only
criteria for
the new student leaving V Unit. They are demonstrated by: -
(a) Tone Arm Reading now around clear reads.
(b) Not RSing on List One Issue 3.
STUDENT WIN
The new student probably has no firm reality on auditing wins,
even if an
older auditor wins may have been scarce.
427
In V Unit the student auditor must obtain a win. The seven
processes given
above will obtain a win, one of them or any of them on any pe,
providing nobody
gets fancy. Just use one, or two of the minor ones on any new student.
Not all
of them. And flatten what you start always.
On pcs who are not Rockslammers and arrive on course in good
condition, do
not run 2-12A. Instead, choose one of the other processes for such a
student pc,
the milder the better. And flatten it to no TA action.
Make the student auditor just audit. Totally muzzled. No
rudiments, no
havingness. Just "Start of Session" and "End of Session". Use a meter.
Thus, intelligently supervised, the new student will get a nice
win.
ESTABLISH A REALITY
The new student, tightly supervised, doing plain Scientology
with no
frills, will obtain a reality that exact Scientology works. This
discourages
squirrelling on course and gives the student an incentive to study
Scientology
as it is, not as altered.
----------
With a case gain, a win and a new reality, the student is ready
for upper
units and can be counted on to get fast passes and an early
graduation.
All failures to pass HCO Bs and upper classes are traceable to
Case (RSing
on List One), lack of wins and low Reality on Scientology. Thus, these
remedied,
you get students graduating, not stagnating on course.
----------
It is the purpose of the V Unit Instructor to achieve these
gains and pass
the new student on.
The V Unit is a Co-audit, one or two weeks long, three hours of
auditing
given and three received daily, 5 days a week.
In the remainder of the day, the unit is part of the W Unit,
specializing
in TRs 0-4 in Practical. The Instructor in the balance of the day fits
into
other units to assist instruction there, usually Practical, to
supervise the TRs
of V Unit students and others, or as assigned.
SUMMARY
We are trying to cure long periods on course. They are best
cured by the
use of' a good V Unit.
Students with a Case gain, a win and a good reality on auditing
will study
harder, graduate faster, be better Scientologists.
All randomity on a course (bad pass-flunk ratios, enturbulation,
etc.)
comes from Rockslammers. Weed them out at course beginning and all
gets very
smooth on the main course.
If a student on arrival is in good shape and not a Rockslammer,
a week in
V Unit is all he or she should spend.
The whole plan falls to pieces if a V Unit Instructor fails to
make good
the purposes of the unit for any reason.
The original plan for the first training of an Academy student
is many
years old and had the above purposes as goals. This became the Comm
Course
because the purposes were not realized in actual practice and TRs only
were
substituted. New processes, muzzled auditing, and a new understanding
in general
should now realize this earliest goal I had for a new student-a case
gain, a win,
a reality on Scientology.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.cden
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
428
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 MARCH 1963
Sthil Students
CLEAR REQUIREMENT
Regarding getting clear, as a student on the Saint Hill Special
Briefing
Course, the following should be noted:
There is no obligation on the part of the course to clear a
student before
termination. While everything will be done to assist clearing the
student and
while it is my desire to clear the student, this is a favor extended,
not a
student's right.
Some students will not industriously apply themselves in their
course
periods and cannot therefore be graduated up through units fast enough
to get
them clear before termination.
The better students are matched in so far as possible in
auditing teams.
This leaves the unwilling student auditor teamed with auditors of less
skill.
This reduces chances of getting clear on those who do not apply
themselves or
will not audit well.
The Course is not an HGC and those who attend it only in the
hope of
receiving auditing are therefore disappointed as they will receive
only as much
auditing as they give and only of the quality they seem to deserve.
The rule of
"Help to be. helped" is adhered to in so far as possible.
While almost all students are people we are proud of, some few
waste their
case by running up overts against the course and causing
administrative upsets.
There are then three general categories of upset:
1. The student who won't study; -
2. The student who won't audit; and
3. The student who causes heavy administrative upsets by
spreading
rumors, writing untrue tales home, constantly nagging
instructors,
etc.
Among these we do not include students ARC Broken in session, as
this is a
fairly routine occurrence and passes away. But included are students
who claim
they are so ARC Broken in session they cannot study or work. We know
this
doesn't hold true as others can study and work and audit after session
ARC
Breaks. -
Therefore, the course instructors reserve the right, when
authorized by
the Course Supervisor, to suspend or cancel the "clearing requirement"
of any
student consistently falling into categories (1), (2) or (3) above,
regardless
of explanations given by the student.
This may or may not affect classification. It certainly does
affect the
amount of time and effort spent by instructors on getting a student
clear.
"Suspension or cancellation of the clearing requirement" means
that the
course resigns any further responsibility for getting the student
clear and is
at liberty to terminate the student at the end of the course period
with or
without classification.
A student who spends three weeks with minimal study effort, a
student who
consistently fails to follow directions in auditing his pc or who does
not
produce results, and the student who consistently runs up overts
against the
course, is liable to suspension or cancellation of the clearing
requirement.
In short, if a student by studying and auditing- won't help us
get other
students clear, or if a student seeks to damage our course and its
efforts to
clear others, through graduating students, we cannot honestly endeavor
to clear
that student.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
429
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1963
Sthil
Students
FOOD AND CLEANING REGULATIONS FOR STUDENTS
EFFECTIVE ON RECEIPT BUT NOT LATER THAN
APRIL 3, 1963
The Grounds Manager is in charge of cleaning in the outside
buildings.
Cancelling all earlier directives, the following regulations now
apply due
to changes in lecture hours.
NO FOOD IN CHAPEL OR PAVILION
1. No food may be stored or eaten in the Chapel or Pavilion at any
time. This
includes tea and coffee and instructors' tea or coffee.
VACATING FOR CLEANING
2. None may remain in or be in the Chapel or Pavilion during the
hours 6.15
p.m. to 7.30 p.m., or on Saturdays or Sundays. All study on
Saturday is to
be in the basement Theory room or its adjacent rooms.
3. Food may be stored or eaten in the outside Boiler Room, the
cloakroom and
the basement hail.
4. The Grounds Manager may turn in names to the Course Secretary
for
Infractions of the above rules.
Without these regulations we cannot maintain the Pavilion or
Chapel for
instruction and auditing or get them cleaned.
When violations of the above are flagrant, the Grounds Manager
should
carefully note the identity of the violators and later have an
Instructor
identify the students and issue the infractions.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
430
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1963
Central Orgs
Sthil Students
ORGANIZATION STUDENTS ON SAINT HILL COURSE
As the staff of the Org is paying the salary of an
organizational student,
it is entitled to know the progress and status of that student.
Accordingly, a weekly report will be sent to the student's Org.
This report is to be posted on receipt on the Staff Bulletin
Board of the
Org by the HCO Secretary.
Any dissatisfaction with the student's progress should be sent
directly to
the student.
A student whose progress is unsatisfactory may be recalled by
the
Organization or Association Secretary.
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1963 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
BLUE
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
ORGANIZATIONAL STUDENT REPORT
To HCO _______________________
From: Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Post this on your staff (not public) Bulletin Board on Receipt -
Course Progress Report on
______________________________________________ for week
ending_________________
Student _____________________week
on course
Theory passes_____________________________ ____________ (5 minimum
requirement)
Practical passes_______________________________________ (5 minimum
requirement)
Auditing Unit ______________________________ (should
be_______________________)
Class Attained ______________________
___________________________
Course Secretary
Comment
Note: Any dissatisfaction felt by org members with this student's
progress should
be addressed to the student.
431
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 JUNE 1963
Sthil
Students
STUDENTS BLOWING
It is the general responsibility of all students to prevent
other students
from blowing and to bring back on Course any student who has "blown".
It is the
particular responsibility of the student's auditor.
In future if a student "blows" it is up to his or her auditor to
get him
or her back and to take the student into the Chapel and pull the
missed
withholds.
Infractions will be awarded to the blowing pc's auditor on the
following
basis:
Student blowing from a study period but not leaving the premises
and
grounds-500 words minimum. -
Student blowing and leaving premises and grounds during course
time or
failing to return to Course in the morning, after lunch or after
dinner- 1,000
words minimum.
If auditor fails to get student back within 4 hours (course
time) an
additional 2,000 words minimum. -
Issued by: Reg Sharpe
Course Secretary
SHSBC
LRH:dr.aap for
Copyright ($) 1963 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 JULY 1963
Orgs
Sthil
Franchise
RETREADS ON SAINT HILL
SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
Students on the Special Briefing Course who require leave of
absence for
emergencies may do so under the following conditions, otherwise they
will be
charged a retread fee irrespective of the length of time they have
already been
on Course.
2 weeks absence (with permission only)
3 months (by very special arrangements beforehand).
Other than that, any student leaving Course for any reason
whatsoever will
be charged a retread fee on returning. No part of the original fee is
returnable.
LRH:jw.cden.rd L. RON HUBBARD
copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
432
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 AUGUST 1963
Students
Central Orgs
SAINT HILL COURSE CHANGES
The following changes in the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
are made
effective 6 August ADI3.
THEORY SECTION - Jenny Edmonds, HSG, D.Scn. Will specialize in
the 5th
Basic (Ability to Study and Apply Scientology Data), and will handle
any non-
progressing student without regard to case reasons for inability to
achieve this
basic. Instead the student will be undercut in data in accordance with
the new
levels of Scientology (HCO Pol Ltr of July 30, AD13), omitting Level
Two and
using Glossary only at Level Three, but treating students that do
progress at
Level Four with only a brief review of Levels One and Three.
PRACTICAL SECTION - H. Parkhouse, HSG, D.Scn. To work out and.
use the new
Auditing Cycle Data as eight new TRs, one for each Comm Cycle and the
last for
consecutive use of all the Comm Cycles contained in the Auditing
Cycle.
AUDITING SECTION - F. Hare, HSG, D.Scn. W Unit to specialize in
definition
of an Auditor "To Listen". To use only the TA of the meter. And to use
all
former auditing as potential charge to be taken off pc's case using
mainly only
the pc to auditor comm line. X Unit to be divided into three parts, X
one using
MS, ruds, hay and Comm Cycle, X two using MS, ruds, hay, Comm Cycle
and meter, X
three using R2H. Z Unit to use- R3N, R3R and R3T (dating and comm, 3N
and 3R
where necessary, the Case Level 2 process).
No other changes are made. All former check sheets and materials
to
continue as before. The above changes of post are a reversion to
earlier posts
held. The auditing change is due to new discoveries about the Auditing
Cycle and
making cases move by TA action. Reach and Withdraw processes where
used in W
will specialize in the pc to auditor Comm Cycle.
Considerable speed up of length of time on course is expected by
reason of
these improvements.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.aap
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
433
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 OCTOBER AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
Field
NEW SAINT HILL CERTIFICATES AND COURSE CHANGES
Without changing the curriculum, units or instructors, on 1St
December AD
13 the Saint Hill Course will be divided into two certificate levels
and the
cost will be reduced.
Many Auditors have not been able to take the course because of
fear they
will be held over beyond the time they can afford.
As clearing has returned as a reality at Class Ill and as this
was the
basic purpose of the course, two certificates will now be issued.
HUBBARD SENIOR SCIENTOLOGIST (ST. HILL). This certificate will be
issued to any
student attending the course 16 weeks. If all course requirements are
also met a
Class Ill will be awarded. An additional four weeks only will be
allowed for
completion of check sheets, but no student enrolled will be held
beyond sixteen
weeks or extended on course more than an additional four weeks. The
cost of the
course has been dropped to �250 Sterling ($700). The student so
enrolled is then
assured of being able to return home after 16 weeks of intensive
training and is
assured of receiving the certificate of HUBBARD SENIOR SCIENTOLOGIST
(ST. HILL).
HPA or HCA is prerequisite to enrollment. Our experience has been that
nobody
can go through the Saint Hill Course, whatever he or she did with
grades,
without becoming a remarkably superior auditor.
The second course begins with the completion of the HSS (ST.
HILL) Course,
an HSS (ST. HILL) being prerequisite to it. This course is scheduled
as a 20
week course. It awards the certificate HUBBARD GRADUATE AUDITOR and,
if all
check sheets are completed, Class IV is also awarded. Class III may
also be
awarded on this certificate. This course takes the student from
clearing to
auditing to OT. Its subject materials are those now existing as Level
Four. The
cost of this course is additional to the HSS Course. The cost is �250
Sterling
($700) with a �50 grant available from Mary Sue to those she
especially wants
on this course.
During the past year the original 20 week SHSBC has been
extended in
subject materials to cover all levels of auditing and as such has
exceeded the
original requirements.
Students enrolled before 1st December, 1963 will receive the
original
course at the original cost and may extend into the second course at
option
without further cost.
Retread students will be honoured as having completed the first
course
regardless of units they are assigned to and their cost will be that
of the
second Course.
Course materials have been stable for some time.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
434
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 JANUARY 1964
Sthil
HCO (Sthil) LTD
CASE SUPERVISOR
The post of Auditing Supervisor is abolished since -all
instructors are
doing auditing supervision as a training measure.
The missing action is that of Case Supervisor.
The Auditing Supervision done by all instructors quite rightly
concentrates on - student skill in auditing.
A Case Supervisor is needed, therefore, whose sole interest and
concern is
the advance of cases on the Saint Hill Briefing Course by any and
various means.
The Case Supervisor will be instructed and supervised by the
Course
Supervisor in - the marking of folders and handling various cases and
will take
over the full handling of case folders as soon as feasible.
All problems having to do with the- individual cases of
students, any and
all auditing assignments and all individual case problems are to be
routed to the Case Supervisor.
In all questions of what is to be run on a student, regardless
of his
situation in training, the word of the Case Supervisor, under the
Supervision
of the Course Supervisor, is final.
ENROLLMENT DIVISION
The extreme importance of increasing enrollment and organizing
the
facilities to accomplish it have been a matter of some concern to me
for the
past many weeks.
The Director of Enrollment is to organize the Administration and
Promotion
necessary to accomplish the desired results.
A full Central Files and Address System comparable to that of a
Central
Organization, means of filling it with lists and providing address
plates must
be provided whether space exists or not.
A full comprehensive and carefully cross-checked system of
contacting and
handling applicants must be devised and carried forward.
Effective Procurement activities must be designed, executed and
carried
out on a continuing basis. -
Good files, lists and addresses, good and intelligent
communication and a
very large increase in enrollment are expected from the Enrollment
Division.
The Director of Enrollment is under the supervision of the Saint
Hill
Administrator and The Enrollment Division is part of HCO (Sthil) Ltd.
-
Mary Long will continue as Course Registrar, personally handling
applicants and the registration and graduation procedures and to that
extent
only is in the Enrollment Division, her duties beginning with the
scheduling of
a student to arrive and the arrival and registration of that student
and ending
with his or her departure. -
The Director of Enrollment has the full responsibility of
filling up the
course and keeping it full. His materiel and personnel requirements
have first
priority.
LRH:dr.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1964 Executive Director
by L. Ron Hubbard HCO (Saint Hill) Ltd
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
435
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 FEBRUARY 1964
[Excerpt]
Sthil
Instructors
Students
REGULATIONS
COURSE
1. No Course student may be used for giving assists to any Saint
Hill staff
of any corporation or members of the public.
2. No -student may be used to give ARC Break Assessments or assists
on
another student who is not his or her assigned preclear. Any
auditing-
received by a student must be from that student's assigned
auditor.
Exception,, instructors or qualified Saint Hill staff members
may audit
students.
3. No student may be audited above his classification level.
Classification
Policies are in full force on course. The only persons who may
'be audited
above their formally assigned Class level are Founding
Scientologists and
these may Only be audited up to Class IV with the reservation
that the
processes must fit the case.
4; Two levels of processing may not be combined, i.e., Class 0
process run
with Class III commands.
5. Students are to be moved forward through units in accordance
with their
check sheets only and no opinion is to be interjected to prevent
such
progress that is contrary to check sheet evidence. In short, if
a
student's check sheets call for his progressing forward no
instructor may
by opinion only restrain his being moved up.
6. A student may not be retrogressed in units. If a student has
attained X2,
for example, he or she may not be returned to W or Xl.
Additional special
check sheets may however be given a student in any unit which
must be
completed before progressing to the next unit or division
thereof.
7. No student may be instructed contrary to existing technology or
advised
to do anything except standard technology.
8. No student may be accepted on course unless they personally
desired to be
here.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Notes A complete copy of this Policy Letter appears in Volume 7, page
31.]
436
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1964
CenOCon
Field Auditors
Sthil Students
TO THE SAINT HILL STUDENT:
INSTRUCTION TARGETS
I have only a very few training targets for the Saint Hill
student. These
are:
1. How to perform flawlessly-as an auditor;
2. How to run certain exact processes; and
3. Obtaining results with those processes by auditing well and
exactly.
Your new check- sheets for Class IV are now designed entirely
around these
principles.
Course conduct is organized entirely to forward them.
Materials exist for them and are being condensed even further.
If you wish to know what is expected of you as a student, see
the above.
INFRACTIONS
All course infractions henceforward will be given solely upon
technical
matters. and results. -
Example: The student has "passed" an HCO B and does not seem to
be able to
apply it in a session. The cause of the infraction will be because the
student
is supposed to know it and doesn't and because the student could not
make it
work. The subject of the infraction will be that material required,
and various
allied matters.
DURATION OF COURSE
A student applying himself or herself in the future should be
able to get
through to Class IV within 16 weeks. -
On Class VI the student already up on Class IV material should
be able to
get through the Theory and Practical of Class VI in a month of hard
work.
Transferred to the Class VI Co-Audit the student should be able
to make UT
in well under 500 hours, barring unusual setbacks caused by wild
auditing
errors.
A student exceeding these times in the future is not working
hard enough.
There were various other reasons the times were being exceeded in the
past and I
have sought to eliminate them.
CLASS VI CO-AUDIT
As the student will be depending on the skill of one auditor it
is up to
him or her to make a sufficiently attractive showing as an auditor to
be able to
team up with another well-trained auditor.
At lower levels of auditing a weekly turn about and non-team (3
or more
way) auditing rules assignment.
But at Class VI this is too hard on the auditor. Therefore the
Class VI
co-auditing is co-auditing in truth with a turn about on alternate
days, 5 hours
auditing, 5 hours being audited. And the same pair audit each other.
437
Therefore, early on in the Class VI course the student who has
not come
with a Co-Auditor should be considering who he or she will be teamed
up with in
the Class VI Co-audit and take an interest in the other fellow's
progress too.
The student should choose out his or her co-auditor unless of course a
pair came
from one area for that purpose and will be returning after the Class
VI course.
It is not required to stay for 'the Class VI Co-audit unless it is
obvious that
the student will have no auditing partner when he or she goes home. In
such an
event termination will be refused for every one's sake.
SUMMARY
The Saint Hill Course is not designed to be a starting auditors'
course
but only to fill in gaps and polish up to Class VI, to teach people to
run GPMs
in Class VI course and to audit toward OT in the Class VI Co-Audit.
These are
the 3 stages of Saint Hill training and auditing. No other stages are
planned.
Therefore the course cannot help but be a flat out high pressure
course.
You can remain in any course at Saint Hill as long as you like.
We haven't
booted anybody out for ages who didn't want to go. It is not the Saint
Hill
staff who holds people on and on except in a few cases where it would
have been
an overt not to persuade continuance, it is the student who continues
himself or
herself.
But the pressure is there to get you through-for the benefit of
those
waiting for you, for your own economics and for all our sakes. We need
able
people. We can make the able so far more able this - spring that all
our
concentration is upon getting you moving along and doing well.
We are on the verge of great social progress for this planet.
Nothing we
have done before-and it is greater than others have done-compares with
what we
are doing now.
By being here, you become part of a great team.
We need you.
So do well.
LRH:dr.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1964
Sthil Only
USE OF RECREATION FACILITIES, 1964
Saint Hill students and staff may:
1. Use tennis courts;
2. Use croquet green by tennis court;
3. Fish in the lake;
4. Walk in grounds.
Specifically withdrawn from use by staff and students this
season is the
swimming pool, which is being reserved for the children.
LRH:gl.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) l964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
438
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1964
Issue II
CenOCon
Field Auditors
Saint Hill Students
SAINT HILL ENROLMENT
MATERIALS, COURSES, AND USE OF
CLASS VI PROCESSES
Anyone enrolling in the Class VI Course at Saint Hill should be
accompanied by a co-auditor from his or her immediate home area.
Two requirements should be made of this person:
1. That they are not enrolling against their will and
2. That they have some comparable auditing skill to the person
they
accompany.
A person not already trained at Saint Hill can expect to be
enrolled first
in the - Class IV course for everyone's sake. We have never had an
auditor enrol
yet who could match Saint Hill standards by prior training and don't
expect to.
But this need not restrain a Saint Hill graduate from bringing
on course a
non-Saint Hill graduate as it merely means a few weeks delay in
beginning to
audit at home.
A person formerly trained at Saint Hill is enrolled directly on
the Class
VI course.
If a person cannot possibly bring a co-auditor, then he or she
should be
prepared to stay on for the Class VI Co-audit.
Particulars concerning schedules and the current course are
contained in
HCO Policy Letter of April 2, 1964.
A person enrolling without a partner to be trained with should
be prepared
to stay on in the Class VI co-audit for 500 auditing hours at 25 hours
per week
as he or she won't be accepted solo in Class VI unless they can stay
on or get
somebody to come on.
Expectancy on course:
1. HPA/HCA and other training or certificates but no training
at Saint
Hill and no co-auditor brought to course:
To Class IV, 16 to 20 weeks.
To Class VI, 4 to 12 weeks.
To Class VI Co-audit completion, 12 to 20 weeks.
Minimum 32 weeks, Maximum 52 weeks.
The more ACCs and Retreads attended before Saint Hill shortens
weeks
toward - minimum.
2. HPA/HCA and other training or certificates but no training
at Saint
Hill but ACCOMPANIED BY A CO-AUDITOR of comparable
background:
To Class IV, 16 to 20 weeks.
To Class VI, 8 to 12 weeks.
439
No Class VI Co-audit.
Minimum 24 weeks, Maximum 32 weeks.
3. Saint Hill graduate unaccompanied by co-auditor:
To Class VI, 8 to 12 weeks.
To Class VI Co-audit, 12 to 20 weeks.
Minimum 20 weeks, Maximum 32 weeks.
4. Saint Hill graduate ACCOMPANIED BY A CO-AUDITOR:
To Class VI, 8 to 12 weeks.
Minimum 8 weeks, Maximum 12 weeks.
If co-auditor is not a Saint Hill graduate the co-auditor only
will have a
minimum of 24 weeks and a maximum of 32 weeks (see above No. 2), but
meanwhile
the former Saint Hill graduate may return home, the co-auditing
beginning on the
return of the co-auditor.
----------
The materials of Class VI will not be released for local
training for
several years (1968) in the interest of minimal upsets.
----------
The cost of any one continuous period of training is the same,
whether 1,
2, 3 or 4~ Discount and retread periods have now expired to all
practical
purposes.
The cost is �275 sterling payable on arrival without credit or
discounts.
There are now no grants for Saint Hill Courses.
Over the years we have found that in practice we gave all the
training
available to any student enrolled. Therefore the cost was in actual
fact the
same to any student. So 1, 2, 3 or 4 above costs �275 sterling.
Retread fees not previously paid are thus the same as any
enrollment.
If a student leaves course for any reason the training period is
deemed to
have expired. Leaves of absence will no longer be granted for periods
exceeding
two weeks. At the end of that time if the student has not returned he
or she is
automatically terminated. All previous leaves of absence have expired.
----------
After using Class VI materials for co-auditing purposes, the
materials are
the student's to use on individual preclears providing the student
trains each
preclear individually for auditing purposes only, not for
classification, up to
Class VI level as a preclear. This is in accordance with new
classification
policies adopted after a majority vote of Scientologists around the
world.
Central Organizations, therefore, may also train preclears as
individual
preclears for only receiving Class VI auditing, not for use as an
auditor. The
Central Organization must have on its staff two Class VI auditors in
Order to
deliver this auditing in the HGC to outside preclears.
Auditing rates for Class VI preclears must realistically include-
training
time and must be well in advance of standard rates. Rates must be
uniform in the
field and the organization of an area.
An organization has no responsibility for casualties resulting
from
unauthorized use of Class VI materials beyond calling a Committee of
Evidence on
offenders. Class VI trained auditors should make this strenuously
plain in their
areas and organizations.
Class VI Preclear training must include:
1. The ethics and basics of Scientology.
440
2. Membership in Scientology official organizations.
3. Clay table work and nomenclature.
4. Freedom of insanity history.
5. Non-membership, under sworn signed oath before a notary, in
hostile organi-
zations or employment by or devotion to anti-Scientology groups.
6. Copies of line plots and goals and auditor's reports must not be
given any
Class VI preclear and no access may be permitted to them by a
Class VI
auditor doing preclear training.
7. No copies of line plots or goals plots may be mimeoed, printed,
typed by
anyone or copied by Class VI preclears or any other person not a
Class VI
auditor.
8. All Line Plots, goals plots and related materials must be kept in
a safe to
which only a Class VI auditor has the combination, whether in a
field
auditor's home or office or a Central Organization.
9, Staff membership in any office does not entitle anyone not a Class
VI
auditor to access to Class VI Line Plots, goals plots or auditor's
reports.
10. All Preclears being trained for Class VI shall be trained only on
synthetic
and non-factual line and goals plots. When auditing begins the
preclear may
be given the line plot- sheet but must return it at session end.
The auditor
alone may possess the goals plot and it may not be handed to the
preclear.
11. While some escapement of materials of Class VI is inevitable,
continuous
vigilance must be exerted to keep it reduced to a minimum. In the
hands of
non-Class VI auditors it could be disastrous to preclears, and in
- the
hands of political or psychiatric groups the materials could be
used to
produce widespread insanity, as they would not be used for
auditing but only
restimulation.
12. Any person being audited by a Class VI - auditor must pledge the
auditor to
co-ordinate his actions with us for the greatest good of the
greatest number
of beings.
----------
Simplifications and advances in Class VI materials which I have
recently
made make it possible for the use of Class VI processes on preclears
trained
only to be audited without danger to them so long as they are in the
hands of a
Class VI auditor.
Further improvements or short cuts beyond what has already been
done
cannot be expected or hoped for due to the nature of the GPM and the
bank.
Thousands of auditing hours and many lucky breaks have simplified
matters
already down to the bare bones, a fact observable in the shortness of
the Class
VI course itself. But there's still quite enough in Class VI to make
it highly
dangerous for the non-classified auditor to use. We can safely and
easily handle
this gun. But it is a gun.
----------
SUMMARY
The above is a summary of training and data, concerning Saint
Hill
Training as of April 1964. No changes in it are to be expected for
years.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
441
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 APRIL 1964
Sthil Students
FOOD AND CLEANING REGULATIONS FOR STUDENTS
EFFECTIVE ON RECEIPT BUT NOT LATER THAN
APRIL 20, 1964
(Cancels previous directives)
The Grounds Manager is in charge of cleaning in the outside
buildings.
Cancelling all earlier directives, the following regulations now
apply.
NO FOOD IN CHAPEL OR HALL
1. No food may be stored or eaten in the Chapel or Hall at any time.
This
includes tea and coffee and instructors' tea or coffee.
VACATING FOR CLEANING
2. None may remain in or be in the Chapel or Hall during the hours
6.15 p.m. to
7.30 p.m. All study on Saturday and Sunday is to be in the Hall,
but the
Hall is to be vacated at 5.0 p.m. on Saturday. Any student using
the Hall at
5.0 p.m. on Saturdays is expected to co-operate with the Grounds
Manager so
that the Hall may be cleaned; such students may take a tape
recorder into
the Pavilion at that time, but in that case, should see that it is
returned
to the Hall before class begins on the following Monday morning or
earlier.
The Hall is closed on Saturday evenings from 5.0 p.m. onwards.
3. Food may be stored during the daytime in the Cloakroom adjoining
the 'Ladies
Shower Room' only. Food may be consumed in the Pavilion during the
lunch
break and dinner break. All waste wrappings and waste food must be
taken to
and deposited in the outside dustbins before the end of the break.
No food
may be kept anywhere on the premises overnight.
4. The Grounds Manager may turn in names to the Course Secretary for
Infractions of the above rules.
Without these regulations we cannot maintain the Hall, Pavilion
or Chapel
for instruction and auditing or get them cleaned.
When violations of the above are flagrant, the Grounds Manager
should
carefully note the identity of the violators and report them to the
Course
Secretary.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
442
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 MAY 1964
Sthil
Students
TRANSPORT
Students desiring noon transport week days from Saint Hill to
East
Grinstead at noon and return at 12.50 may have it by procuring an
invoice from
the Income Section costing 5 shillings per week.
The invoice should be plainly dated and displayed to the driver
on
departure from Saint Hill.
The reason for the charge is the limited transport space
available.
There is no charge for staff members.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 MAY 1964
Sthil
TRANSPORT
(Adds to HCO Policy Letter of May 8, 1964)
Regarding HCO Policy Letter of May 8, 1964, it should be clearly
understood that there is no contract to carry passengers on the staff
bus for
fares.
The 5/- payment by students should be invoiced by Accounts as a
contribution to the upkeep of the bus. The student is then privileged
to ride on
the bus as and when available for one week.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gI.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
443
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 MAY 1964
Sthil
INSTRUCTOR'S CONFERENCE REPORT FORM
WEEK ENDING: ________________
SUPERVISORS: Complete your own section below before Conference on
Friday and
read and hand to Conference Chairman. Leave other
sections blank.
THEORY AND PRACTICAL REPORT:
(Cross out one)
Total Checkouts: __________
Total Passes: __________
Total Flunks: __________
Number of students with less than 10 passes:______________
Names of Students with less than 5
passes:________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Number of Pink sheets given:____________
Names of Auditors giving poor quality
auditing:_________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
____________________________Sign.
CASE SUPERVISOR REPORT:
Total T.A. Course Unit:_________
Total T.A. Co-Audit Unit:__________
Names of Students personally
audited:_____________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Names of Preclears with less than 15 T.A.
Average:______________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
____________________________Sign.
COURSE SECRETARY:
Names of Students leaving Course:
________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Names of new Students for next week:
_____________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
T.V. Demo results:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________
Number of Students on Course: ________
Number of Applications on hand: ________
____________________________Sign.
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright ($) 1964 L. RON
HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
444
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 JUNE 1964
Sthil Students
NEW STUDENTS DATA
STAR RATED FOR NEW STUDENTS
Tape Passes
On those live lectures you hear, when you take the Friday tape
examination
and keep your exam paper when it is handed back, and present it to
Theory as
evidence, any live lecture you have so heard is credited on your check
sheet by
Theory where the lecture appears on the check sheet.
Not all the lectures I give appear later on check sheets but
many do and
you should get credit for those you have heard.
If you have a Friday exam paper on any lecture you have heard
live and the
grade is above 90% for star rated and above 75% for a 75, any grade
for a zero
rate, if the lecture appears as a tape on your check sheets it will be
marked
off as passed and initialed by a Theory Instructor.
Auditing Assignments
In auditing before the Level VI Co-audit, it is customary to
split up
teams that will eventually co-audit to OT.
The reasons for this are
1. Auditing skill tends to become adapted to one pc and
deteriorate. This
does not make a good pro, it makes only a co-auditor. I'm
making you
into a pro, not a co-auditor regardless of classification
status. I
can't do that by giving you just the pc you are already
educated to
run. You'd be a one pc auditor.
2. Mutual withholds develop in teams and restrain auditing
results.
3. Your auditing skill tends to look better or worse than it
is..
We don't even wholly guarantee you and your co-auditor that you
will co-
audit in the Level VI Co-audit for one team member may be Case type A
and the
other B. A Case type A can run through anything. A Case type B Stops
at a comma.
Thus one gets too far out-of pace with the other and it's just too
hard on one
member of the team who would be, of course, the Type B and already in
trouble.
It would be selfish indeed of a Type A to force a Type B to run GPMs
far beyond
where he or she has had them run. We will try to put the team together
in the
Level VI Co-audit and mostly do but this AB factor is a technical one
and we
can't do anything about it short of good auditing.
Student Rules
A lot of students come a cropper on the rules and try to carry
on without
concurrence.
You are only here for a few months. In your hands is your next
multi-
trillion years.
The rules are there to get you through. Breaking them, in my
opinion, is
too pricey.
Rapidity of Progress
A few new students arrive here in a high state of "know it all,
just want
a few new gimmicks".
Students who have this state of mind just don't learn or
progress. And
they really get stuck in. We're not doing it to them. They are trying
to learn
over the top of their own postulate that they already know it (when
they don't)
and so get into a ridge. They're not stuck in the course. They're
stuck in this
conflict.
445
In the first place, no new student at Saint Hill has ever been
known to
give a standard session on arrival, despite all the data being
available. But
they don't know enough about auditing to know whether they're doing
well or not,
much less know how to audit. Factually they usually look pretty
pitiful. There
they are making Gross Auditing Errors in an avalanche, missing comm
cycles, feet
in the pc's face with their meter upside down, telling the Class VI
auditor who
is his Instructor "I know all about it. We had a course in Slobovia
much better
than this one. The pcs audited the auditor and it ........
Well you can't blame the instructor if he seems to be having a
hard time
to keep from laughing in the new student's face. It's only their
courtesy that
keeps them from reaching over and connecting the unconnected cans this
new
genius has failed to plug into the meter as a fitting touche.
Some auditors trained elsewhere with great ARC but precious
little "do
it", don't have enough training to know they aren't trained. And it's
always the
very worst trained auditors who howl the loudest about how they don't
need to
know. The majority relaxedly study and improve their skill, get
results and
there it is.
I myself periodically study auditing and put a polish on my own
skill. I
don't have to say "I don't know", but I'm not so arrogant as to
believe I'm
above knowing how to do things. So if every year or two I can study
how to audit
without going into a long rigmarole about how I'm above all that, I
can
reasonably expect others to have a sane view of their own skill too.
Any skill
can be improved-one can know more about any subject-unless one has
already
decided he or she already knows all about it.
The successful progress of a student is inversely proportional
to the
student's preconception of knowing it already. An arrogant assumption
of total
knowing without inspection is the surest way to make no progress.
One does or does not know the data before him. That's
elementary. Why
should it become involved with emotionalism?
The fast student is not concerned with necessities to maintain
status by
asserting how much he or she already knows. The fast student is only
interested
in knowing what he does not know, studying it and then knowing that he
knows it.
The slow student is so busy putting on that he knows that he
never finds
out he doesn't in fact know. To do this before a lot of experts such
as Saint
Hill Instructors seems pretty pointless.
Results today are by the text book. Lack of results are always
attended by
departures. One can or cannot get results with auditing. This means
that one is
or is not doing a text book job..
In our case the text book has 14 years of hard won experience
behind it.
So text book auditing gets the best results. It's that simple. -
The statement "I know all about Scientology but I don't get very
good
results" is a pretty silly statement today. It's saying in fact "I
pretend to
more than I know and the flubs show up in my results".
Well, that's getting right down to the reasons for slow progress
and
calling a spade a spade, but it's awful true. It's really the only
reason back
of slow progress on course.
The speed with which you complete your course and get to OT is
entirely
regulated by the speed with which you discover there's something here
to learn.
Most students handle this very early. I'm sure you will.
I give you my good wishes for a fast progress.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
446
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1964
Sthil Only
Sthil Students
Post Student Board TERMINATIONS
EFFECTIVE AT ONCE
Final Classification is not automatic with Termination.
The student may be terminated with a Provisional Classification.
On terminations student classifications are confirmed as
permanent or
withdrawn.
A review of a student's work before termination must be
undertaken before
classification is given. This is in addition to the Provisional
Examination and
is in addition to Instructor or Supervisor recommendations and is the
responsibility of the HCO Board of Review which may not now be part of
the
Course.
LRH:jw.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1964
Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students
FINAL CLASSIFICATION
ON TERMINATION FROM SAINT HILL
(Effective at Once)
As of now, when a student has passed the Prov. Class VI exam lie
will
officially be "In Training for Class VI".
This means only that he is thereby permitted to run R6 under
supervision
while on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course. It has no other
significance
and does not guarantee a Class VI classification on termination.
Since there will be no "provisional" certificates awarded in
future, a
student who has not earned a Class VI certificate will be awarded a
Class IV or
any lower level certificate-depending on the state of completion of
his check
sheets and his level of auditing ability. -
In future no student will be awarded a higher certificate after
he has
left Saint Hill than that received on termination unless he/she
retreads at
Saint Hill for higher classification.
Any student who has already left the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course
with a Prov. Classification should apply to HCO Board of Review for a
full
classification before the 31st of December 1964-submitting evidence of
their
claims. This should include a dispatch from their nearest
Organization.
If no such evidence has been submitted by the 31st of December
1964, the
student will automatically be granted a Class IV.
LRH:jw.cden.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) l964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 13 November 1964, Provisional Class VI
Classification, page 448.]
447
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 NOVEMBER 1964
Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students
PROVISIONAL CLASS VI CLASSIFICATION
(Cancels HCO Policy Letter of 18 September 1964.)
(Confirms HCO Bulletin of 1 November AD14 by stating it as
Policy.)
(Effective at once.)
1. Re: HCO Policy Letter of 18 September 1964
Provisional Class VI Classification will again be awarded.
In future no student will be awarded a higher certificate or
classification after he has left Saint Hill than that received on
termination unless he/she retreads at Saint Hill for higher classification.
This does not cancel the clause that "any student who has already left the
Saint Hill Special Briefing Course with a Prov Classification should apply
to HCO Board of Review for a full classification before the 31st of
December
1964."
2. Re: HCO Bulletin of 1 November AD14
THE MOMENT A STUDENT PASSES HIS PROVISIONAL CLASS VI
CLASSIFICATION AND
GOES ON TO ROUTINE 6, HE OR SHE MUST ONLY SOLO AUDIT.
The Term Provisional Class VI means hereafter only "HAS THE
RIGHT TO SOLO
AUDIT ON CLASS VI MATERIALS AND MAY NOT CO-AUDIT ON R6 OR AUDIT PCS ON
R6."
The only exception to this is the use of L6 Auditing-by-List and
ARC Break
Assessments. These may be co-audited. But no administrative system may
be set up
which automatically assigns students to do L6 work on each other at
regular
intervals such as- "Every Friday"; as it is needed when it is needed
and never
when it isn't needed.
* * * * * *
This HCO Policy Letter applies also to any student who has
already left
the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course with a Provisional Class VI
Classification. -
Violation of this Policy may result in the Provisional Class VI
Classification being revoked.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
448
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 FEBRUARY 1965
Gen Non-
Remimeo
Sthil Scientology Staff -
Sthil Students
Franchise
COURSE PATTERN
(Effective March 6, 1965)
The Saint Hill Special Briefing Course is to be organized as
follows:
It will be divided into four units. These units are:
Unit A covering Level 0.
Unit B covering Levels I and II.
Unit C covering Levels III and IV.
Unit D covering Level VI.
One Chief Instructor is in charge of each unit. He or she is
responsible
for the theory, practical and auditing supervision and folder marking
and all
other training and case and discipline matters relating to that
student for the
duration of his progress up through the levels covered by that Unit.
When the student's theory, practical and auditing check sheets
are
complete for a level, he or she is examined by the HCO Board of
Review. This
will consist of-one or more examiners for Levels 0 to IV inclusive and
a special
examiner for Level VI. Classes for the auditor are awarded on the
successful
completion of each level up to IV and Provisional Class VI is granted
so that
the student can then begin auditing at that level while still on
course. Those
students auditing at Level IV while waiting to be Provisionally
Classified to VI
so that they can audit at Level VI will audit and be audited in the
same
classroom -as in other lower units. When Provisionally Classed and are
auditing
on Class VI they report to their unit half days for study only and do
their
auditing off premises in the balance of the day, submitting their
reports to
their instructor.
Therefore there is no Class VI audited on premises, but final
classification depends on their folders being accurate and showing
gain. When it
is seen by periodic checks that their tone arm is high or they look
bad when
looked over, a co-audit patch up is assigned to work in the D Unit
classroom
with the D students and the full day is spent on premises.
In all units A to C a student must be provisionally classed
before being
permitted to audit in that unit. Until so classed all time is spent on
study or
in occasional patch up sessions as assigned using assist type
processes.
Provisional Classification is awarded by the - HCO Board of Review
after making
sure that key materials, vital to the processes to be run at that
level, have
been checked out. Auditing on the level processes is then begun.
However, all
students on entering a unit are assigned as Co-audit for assists and
Twin Check-
out. A D unit provisional is of course more thorough,
A student in a unit is classed for the level he or she has
completed but
the student in a unit is designated for the classes being studied for
as
follows:
A 0 Class Zero Unit A Chapel
449
B I Class I Unit B Chapel
B II Class II Unit B Chapel
C III Class III Unit C Pavilion
C IV Class IV Unit C Pavilion
D VI Class VI Hall
E VI Class VI Study Hall
Class VI Auditing. Off premises.
----------
A Chief Instructor is assigned to each of A, B, C and D, four
Chief
Instructors in all. The course is headed by the Course Supervisor and
the title
"Supervisor" is no longer otherwise used.
While progressing toward his Classification for each level the
student is
under only one instructor.
----------
On enrolling the student is not given an examination for
placement but is
checked for valid enrolment pre-requisites (which remains HCA) and is
entered
into Unit A which consists of a check sheet for theory, practical and
auditing.
He is assigned to a Co-audit team for assists and Twin checking and a
Practical
team. Materials include orientation at Saint Hill, vocabulary
materials, etc.,
to safeguard against previously misunderstood words.
When the student has passed his check sheet in-Theory and
Practical on key
materials vital to permit auditing at that level, he goes to HCO Board
of Review
for his Provisional Classification. Looking over his check sheet and
making sure
he knows what he has passed by random cross checking on twin check
basis, HCO
Board of Review decides on his qualification for a Provisional
Classification.
HCO Board of Review examinations occur daily and are not scheduled for
a certain
day of the week. Promotions to Provisional or to Classification can
occur on any
day of the week and the students can pass to the next unit on any day.
When
Provisional is awarded only then the student is audited or audits on
the Zero
processes, all this under one instructor and then is examined by an
HCO Board of
Review Officer and classed finally for that level if passed. He and
his
Instructor are informed of his classing and it is posted at once.
This same procedure is followed through all the levels on upward
provisionally classed, then classed at each level.
A Grade Certificate is also furnished to show he has been
audited through
the Level.
The Grade Certificate states that the student has received all
processes
in the level just gone through and is ready for his next grade. It
reads "This
will certify that has received all required processes of Grade
and,
having completed Grade as a preclear is ready for the processes of
the next
grade." It is signed by the HCO Board of Review after inspection of
the case
folder of the student.
Saint Hill is a briefing and review course and the check sheets
are not
the check sheets of an Academy for the same class and grade,
containing only
vital materials.
A student can have a classification examination for IV or below
any time
he or she wishes, regardless of course status or unit.
Any existing classification is laid aside for course duration at
this time
(but is reinstated at course end, even though the student will
probably be well
above it) as the final materials now in existence are new and quite
stable and
students need the briefing.
450
On termination the highest classification obtained on the course will
be
actually made up in full and signed.- This is usually Class VI.
However the
student is owed-only the highest certificate attained as classing is
entirely
optional with the HCO Board of Review always.
Examination by HCO Board of Review Officers consists of checking
the
auditing folder and rechecking randomly on the check sheets of Theory
and
Practical.
A student may go as high as he likes on this course but must be
a valid
HCA to enroll. However, our oldest rule holds. Anyone can have an HCA
who can
pass the HCA examination, which today is the examination for Class II.
But it
would be a good idea for anyone trying for an HCA by examination only
to be
examined for it by his nearest HCO first.
It is the full intention of the course to round out all those
small bits
missed in former study and to get comfortably flat all the required
processes of
a level the student, as a preclear, might have had left unflat up to
Level IV
and thereby launch the student comfortably into Level VI materials.
Time on course largely depends on excellence of former study,
processes
amongst those required already flat and the length of time the student
wants to
spend. A large number of those who remain at Saint Hill do so out of
their own
wish to be at Saint Hill, course or no course, not because they don't
progress.
The glittering goal of' UT, attainable demonstrably as it is, the
atmosphere and
people here, the excitement, are far more the cause of long stays.
Well grounded
auditors have completed in under 12 weeks. But some well grounded
auditors are
still finding reasons to stay after eight months even when they could
have
graduated months before.
Previous estimates of time on course may have to be revised.
Amount of
materials from Zero to IV have reduced and the length of time to
finish off a
reactive mind has dropped from several years to a potential hammer and
tongs few
months due to recent developments. Level VII is in sight and may be a
contributing factor in the future, but is not part of the present
course and
will not be, constituting another course since it will have to be
taught under
entirely different conditions.
----------
Academies will probably be following this same pattern up to IV
except
that each level will be separately enrolled for and delivered in the
longer
period of one month. Therefore the Saint Hill Course, originally
designed to
improve auditing over the world, having done so has to be taught now
in this
fashion to give old auditors a look in at each level so they can audit
and teach
it and newer ones a chance to be thorough and catch up on any bits
skimped. -
Training is otherwise unchanged, consisting of three check
sheets, theory,
practical and auditing. And the materials of VI have been relatively
stable for
nearly a year and IV and below complete and stable for many months.
Therefore,
shifting technology is no longer a student problem, for there is no
reason to
shift it when it's the shortest proven way. Printed texts will take a
long time
to prepare and issue. But meanwhile, it's all here at Saint Hill.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright ($) 1965 -
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Modified by HCO P/L 2 April 1965, Star-rate Checkouts for Process,
page 453, and -amended by HCO P/L 14 October 1965, Course Pattern, page
464.]
451
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MARCH 1965
Sthl
FACULTY MEETING REPORT
Week
Ending________________
Chief Instructors: Complete your reports below before the Faculty
Meeting on
Friday, read and hand to Faculty Chairman. Leave
other
sections Blank. This is a weekly report.
______________________________________________________________________
________
|Level| New |Total # |Prov CL|Full CL|THEORY|PRACTICAL| # of |
T.A.| # of |
| |Students|Students| Grads | Grads |Passes| Passes/ |Audtors|
Ave.| Blows |
| | | | | |/Flnks| Flunks | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 0 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 1 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 2 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 3 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 4 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
| 6 | | | | | | | |
| |
|-----|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|---------|-------|-----
|-------|
Signed__________________________
Act. Chief
Inst.
Course Supervisor
Total
Definite Students booked ____________________
Indefinite Students booked ____________________
Total ____________________
Course Income Sterling ____________________
Dollars ____________________
Disbursement �
Graduates CL VI
T.V. Demo Results:-
Names of New Students for next week
Number of Students on Course
Signed Course Sup. _________________________________________
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL- RIGHTS RESERVED
452
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
Sthl Scientology Div III
staff
Sthl Students
Board of Review STAR-RATE CHECKOUTS FOR PROCESS
(Modification of HCO Policy Letter of 27 February 1965
"Course Pattern")
It has been found that permission to audit at a level on the
processes of
that level when granted only after a provisional certification has
resulted in
students having to spend all their time in auditing, in order to get
their
auditing checksheet completed prior to classification for that level,
thereby
resulting in no further theory or practical periods for the student
and a
disruption of course scheduling. -
To remedy this and therefore assist in more rapid student
advancement, the
student may audit on a process of a certain level when he has passed
all theory
and practical checkouts for that process. While the student is getting
his
auditing checksheet complete for that process, he can be studying and
getting
theory and practical checkouts on the next process requirement for
that level
and can begin auditing with that process when he has flattened the
earlier
process and has passed all checkouts for the next process on his
theory and
practical checksheets.
This, therefore, means that the Board of Review need no longer
give
provisional classification examinations, but need only ascertain that
the
student has passed all theory and practical checkouts for the next
process to be
run for a particular level.
We will call this a STAR-RATED Board of Review- Checkout. We
will have to
star-rate, therefore, each and every HCOB and tape that is-required to
run an
exact process. As this is not done on your bulletins, instructors must
comb out
the HCOBs and tapes relating to the processes in the levels and Star-
Rate them.
The system then consists of the student doing the theory and
practical for
a process, getting a Star-Rated PASS from the Board of Review on that
process.
The student can then audit on that process on his course while getting
remaining
theory and practical for that course and getting ready to get STAR-
RATED for the
next process he is to run on his pc in that level.
Future HCOBs and tapes will adhere to this design.
POLICY is that a student may not audit a process he has not
passed theory
and practical for in the HCO Board of Review.
POLICY is changed in that there is no provisional classification
required
for a student on course in order to run the processes of the level he
is being
trained on.
This POLICY applies also to R6 where R6EW is the first process,
but
requires knowing quite a lot about the bank to be given a Star-Rated
R6EW.
R6EWS and R6EWP would require two more STAR-RATED PASSES from the
Board of
Review.
POLICY is that a Star-Rated Board of Review Pass is not a
classification
and permits no rights as a Classification and applies only to the
student while
on course.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mb.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
453
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY-LETTER OF 13 APRIL 1965
Sthil
Sthil Students
COURSE R6 AUDITING
Outside, off premises-auditing is cancelled herewith and all
students on
R6 will do their auditing on premises.
LRH:jw.kd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 APRIL AD15
Gen Non Remimeo Issue II
Post Staff Board
Post Student Board
CLASSIFICATION ON GPMs
Effective June 1 1965
All Saint Hill Classification for running GPMs will be granted
as
PROVISIONAL on termination and will become permanent only when the
holder is
checked out as a total Clear at Saint Hill.
This of course does not affect earlier classifications.
Classification is an award and is not owed anyone. It is for
proficiency
only.
Permanent Classification in the level below GPMs may be obtained
and used
to audit for a fee, an entirely practical matter as one is not
supposed to use
GPM materials on the public anyway and auditing another GPM
Provisional would be
a turn-about Coaudit just to Audit by List any charge accumulated
during solo.
----------
In any re-numbering of levels the Classification for the Level
which has
changed number is also changed. Example: Level I becomes by
rearrangement of
levels Level II. If this occurs, the Auditor Classified as I may, by
application
to his training org, have his class changed to II without further
examination.
Such a change is about to occur as I have found two lower levels
than
those already numbered and V has been left empty.
Similarly, pcs may be regraded up providing they have the lower
level -
processes completed, a brief action for the most part.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
454
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 APRIL AD 15
Gen Non Remimeo
Sthil Execs Tech Division - TR
Sthil Students
Tech Sec HAT GPM UNIT
D of T HAT
GPM Unit Instructor HAT Examiners: Check out
All GPM Unit Students all Hats marked on this
1st Issue to all new HCO Pol Ltr.
GPM Unit Students
ORGANIZATION GPM UNIT
(Effective Monday 19 Apr 65)
The organization and conduct of Unit D will- now be similar to
the other
lower Units.
The same auditing, theory and practical times will be kept as in
other
units.
Processes Star-Checked may be run as soon as checked out on the
student. The
Twin Checking and coaudit teams will be used.
Due to the powerful nature of the materials no departures from
schedule,
procedure or policy will be tolerated.
Any "advices" required by the student from the-GPM Unit
Instructor must be
answered entirely and only by directing the student to the study
materials
themselves to find the answer there. In this the twin can work with
the other on
(preferably) misunderstood words in the text, getting them fully
-understood, or
(secondarily) finding the past subject-Remedy B-which has the other
hung up or
(thirdly) working it Out on clay table, in addition to the assigned CT
exercises.
The GPM Unit Instructor similarly is expressly forbidden to seek
advice
from "superiors" or unusual solutions or variations, and is bound in
general by
the same rules that bind every other instructor-no alter-is, no
unusual
solutions, no toleration of non-compliance in auditing by students and
no
toleration of alter-is by student auditors. The reply to "It didn't
work" is
always "What did you do?" To afford unusual solutions to students or
to the GPM
Unit or any other instructor, or to vary or negate technology or
policy is a
serious offence.
In the GPM Unit the materials misused and altered can be very
damaging.
Therefore in this Unit above all others the observance of this policy
has no
leeway of any kind. Any Instructor or Student or superior negating or
interpreting or "advising" on GPM policy or materials of study will be
promptly
charged.
Any Instructor receiving into the GPM Unit students not
generally
qualified in the lower levels, who commit the Gross Auditing Errors or
whose
cases have not shown marked improvement on lower levels may likewise
be charged
if failing to report it within one week of the student's entrance into
Unit D.
Skimped check sheets, incomplete check sheets or careless passes
are also
chargeable.
It must be thoroughly understood that the student is there to be
instructed on the exact materials furnished and that the Unit is to be
conducted
exactly in accordance with policies governing the handling of its
materials.
Any senior advising the Instructor of the GPM Unit differently
than
policy is endangering the job and reputation of the Instructor. The
Instructor
may therefore ask for a Comm Ev on that senior up to the level - of
Secretary.
Any student given "interpretations" of the material or policy by an
Instructor
has his repute and future endangered by the Instructor and may
therefore request
a Comm Ev of that Instructor. While this is true of all course units
whether at
Saint Hill or an Academy it is to be entirely energetically followed
up on the
GPM Unit of the Special Briefing Course.
Because of its very strict and exact demands in following
technology and
policy the GPM Unit Instructor will receive a small bonus for every
student who
successfully qualifies for Provisional at Class VI. But conversely,
for every
student disqualified for
455
good and distinct cause by the Director of Examinations after
recommendation of
the student by the GPM Unit Instructor for Provisional Classification,
the
Director of Examinations will receive a small bonus. The bonuses are
payable
monthly. It is the responsibility of the parties claiming- the -
bonuses to
submit the Purchase Order themselves.
Further, students disqualified by the Director of Examinations
from the
GPM Unit pass directly into the Department of -Review or the HGC at
the
student's own cost before leaving Saint Hill or being classified. Both
the HGC
and the Department of Review make charges as the service is costly to
give and
the student must not have taken advantage of the course facilities or
must have
failed to report "interpretations" of technology or policy or their
negation or
must have sought unusual solutions from others instead of doing what
is given on
bulletins and tapes.
Every effort is being made by myself-to give the material to the
student
and get it safely and beneficially applied. On my part all I ask is
adherence to
the technology and policy of the GPM Unit and their correct
application. Any
variations or new materials or new texts will be written by myself
when found
necessary after thorough Review of existing materials. Suggested
corrections or
expansions should be reported in writing with full details and
references and
accompanied by copies of the material in question to the Department of
Review
but the person reporting and that Department may not relieve anyone
from
compliance with the material on which the change is requested until it
is
changed by HCOB or HCO Po1 Ltrs or is placed on tape by myself.
No other issue or "interpretation" has any validity and the
course, the
seniors, the instructors and the students are entirely responsible for
holding
firmly to the policy officially- released by HCO Policy Letter and
following
exactly the technology released by HCOBs and on my tapes.
The material is powerful. It will make a real Clear for the
first time in
the history of Man, and thus opens the further way to OT. -
All I want is good auditors and cleared people.
I fully intend to have them, if necessary at any cost.
In accepting the GPM Unit Instruction post on the Course the
Instructor
agrees to these terms.
In entering that Unit, the student agrees to these terms.
If not agreed with, then there are other posts and there is the
HGC.
Here is where we separate the men from the boys, the ladies from
the
children.
Up to now it was maybe an unserious affair.
It takes guts to go through the bank, it takes steady good
instruction and
earnest bright study and exact text book auditing. The tolerance of
sloppy
auditing in this level is nil. One mistake is too many.
This is the Road out that must be followed. I didn't build the
bridge to
have people knocked off of it.
So that's policy on the GPM Unit.
I rather think it will be- followed.
For if it isn't the way is barred for the next eternity. We
aren't playing
now.
That's the way it is.
Let's get the show on the road.
LRH:mLrd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: Paragraph regarding bonus has been corrected per HCO PL 23
April 1965,
Issue H, adding specific of who gets bonus.]
456
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 MAY 1965
Gen Non Remimeo
Sthil Staff
Sthil Students URGENT
SHSBC UNIT
GRADUATION
(Effective 17 May, 1965)
The Instructors of Units C & D need not accept on their units
any student
from a lower unit who does not have an adequate meter and needle.
Students whose meter responses - and TA position are non-Optimum
have been
demonstrated by recent survey to be incapable of absorbing the
material of the
Levels Orientation, Understanding and Enlightenment and stack up in
Classes III
and IV with increasing frequency.
This is therefore a matter forced upon us by the states of case
of people.
At the same time we are fortunate to have the technology which handles
all this.
A student whose meter is non-optimum (high TA, very low TA
sluggish or
pulsing or RSing needle, or "dead thetan") just wastes time when he
moves above
the level of his case.
Classes 0, I and II are perfectly capable of improving meter
conditions on
the average pc when processing is properly applied and the Case
Cracking Section
can do the job quickly for those whose cases are in rougher shape, and
more
cheaply than a student's living costs for the period he would lag on
course.
Instructors who do not graduate students from their units into
the next
unit are of course subject to down statistics and therefore Emergency.
This discovery of how and why some students took so much time on
course
makes it necessary to lay down the policy contained herein:
Units C & D may not accept students whose meters show poor case
condition.
The Director of Examinations may not pass for graduation or
termination
students whose meters show non-optimum case condition.
Getting his case in shape is a responsibility of the student.
When the
student fails to take responsibility for it, course personnel may act
to get it
done.
The Saint Hill Course is a Course, not a clinic. It is the
business of the
course to produce auditors who can audit. Little attention need be
paid to cases
or auditing schedules or auditing check sheets except as above and to
give the
student a chance to demonstrate his skill as an auditor. -
Case is no excuse for not auditing. It can however prevent
classification
if not cared for by the student. No one is owed classification. It is
an award.
The Director of Examinations or any examiner may demand
Auditor's Reports
of the student to prove his or her ability as an auditor, and may
demand a
session be given so that it can be observed. -
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
457
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 MAY 1965
Sthil Staff Sthil Students
HCO SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
STUDENT GUIDE TO ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR
GENERAL
1. Adhere completely to the Code~of a Scientologist for the
duration of the course and behave in a manner becoming to a Scientologist
at all times.
2. Get sufficient food and sleep. Always eat breakfast before class
and morning sessions.
3. When being a preclear, be one, not a student or auditor. When
being an auditor, be an Auditor, not a student or preclear. When in class
and lectures, be a student not an auditor or a preclear.
4. Get off all your known withholds. Know definitely that you have
absolutely no hope for case advancement unless you get these known
withholds off to your auditor. Any violation of Course rules must be
reported by the auditor on the auditing report for that preclear so that
they are no longer withholds from L. Ron Hubbard, Mary Sue Hubbard or
Supervisors.
5. Students are seated during lectures according to units, the
highest unit in the front, the lowest unit in the back.
6. When you are requested to ask questions during a lecture, raise
your hand and receive permission first before stating your question. Never
speak out unless permission has been granted.
7. Be as quiet as possible during lectures. Laughter or applause is
perfectly all right. The sounds not desired are rustling of paper, scraping
of chairs, coughing, clicking of ball point pens in and out, or any other
such noises. If you can't prevent yourself from coughing, please leave the
lecture as quietly as possible. You can hear the lecture later from the
tape. If you do have a tendency to cough or clear your throat, please sit
to the back of the lecture room as it is farthest from the microphone.
8. If you don't know something or are confused about course data,
ask a Supervisor or send a despatch. Do not ask other students as this
creates progressively worsening errors in data. Also dispatches from you to
L. Ron Hubbard will be relayed if you place all such in the basket marked
"Students Out".
9. Students may only use the coin box telephone during non class
periods.
10. Be polite and courteous to the children.
11. You must get the permission of L. Ron Hubbard to leave course
before you are allowed to leave. You won't be released if there is any
doubt that you are inadequate technically or your case is considered in
poor condition. Give a three week advanced warning as to when you are
leaving.
12. All these rules and regulations are inflexible, and are to be
followed by all students during the course unless permission has been
previously received from a Supervisor.
458
AUDITING
13. Do not consume any alcoholic beverage between 6 a.m. on Sundays
and after
class on Fridays.
14. Do not consume or have administered to yourself or any other
student any
drug, antibiotics, aspirin, barbiturates, Opiates, sedatives,
hypnotics or
medical stimulants for the duration of the course without the approval
of the
Course Supervisor.
15. Do not give any processing to anyone under any circumstances
without
direct permission of the Course Supervisor. (Emergency assists
excepted.)
16. Do not receive any processing from anyone under any
circumstances without
the express permission of the Course Supervisor.
17. Do not engage in any "self-processing" under any circumstances
during the
course at any time.
18. Do not receive any treatment, guidance, or help from anyone in
the healing
arts, i.e. physician, dentist, etc., without the consent of the Course
Supervisor. (Emergency treatment when the Course Supervisor is not
available is
excepted.)
19. Do not engage in any rite, ceremony, practice, exercise,
meditation, diet,
food therapy or any similar occult, mystical, religious, naturopathic,
homeopathic, chiropractic treatment or any other healing or mental
therapy while
on course without the express permission of the Course Supervisor.
20. Do not discuss your case, your Auditor, your- Supervisors, your
classmates, L. Ron Hubbard, HCO WW personnel or HCO WW with anyone.
Save your
unkind or critical thoughts for your processing sessions or take up
complaints
with any Supervisor.
21. Do not engage in any sexual relationships of any nature or kind
or get
emotionally involved with any classmate who is not your legal spouse.
22. Follow the Auditor's Code during all sessions when being the
Auditor.
23. Follow all auditing directions given you on report forms for
your
preclear.
24. Follow technical procedure as outlined on the course exactly and
precisely.
25. Be honest at all times on your auditing report forms. Stating
every
process run, Tone Arm changes and times, Sensitivity setting,
cognitions of your
preclear and any changes of physical appearance, reactions,
communication level,
or otherwise what you observe in your preclear.
26. Place all reports in the folder of your preclear after each
session, and
place all folders in the basket marked for such.
27. Students must not read their own report folder or that of
another student,
unless he is auditing that student.
GROUNDS AND PREMISES
28. Do not make any undue noise in the evenings either indoors, in
the
grounds, or when leaving class.
29. Use the correct entrances for entering and leaving the premises.
30. The Hall and only the Hall is open on Saturdays and Sundays and
students
may come to study and listen to tapes on those days from 8.00 a.m. to
5.00 p.m.
459
31. The Manor is Out of bounds to students without permission of a
Supervisor.
32. Look over the grounds, by all means, but do not pick the
flowers. You may
use tennis courts and croquet green by tennis courts and you may fish
in the
lake. The use of the swimming pool is not allowed as it is reserved
for the
children.
33. During the week all class buildings are closed at 6.30 p.m.
unless
otherwise assigned.
QUARTERS
34. Do not put cigarettes out in the plastic waste baskets or on the
floors.
35. Keep all your bulletins, supplies and personal possessions in
the space
allotted to you and keep your space neat and orderly.
36. Do not use lecture platform in the Chapel to work on or to put
things on.
37. Auditors and preclears are not allowed to smoke during sessions.
Students
are allowed to smoke during breaks only and always outside any study
or auditing
quarters.
38. The basket marked "Student In" is the basket where all
communications,
bulletins or mail to students are placed. Always check this basket
daily to see
if you have received any communications.
39. Report and turn in any damaged property or goods used on the
Course.
Protect and keep the premises in good condition.
40. No food may be stored or eaten in the Chapel or Hall at any
time.
41. Food may be stored during the daytime in the Cloakroom adjoining
the
'Ladies Shower Room' only. Food may be consumed in the Pavilion during
the lunch
break and dinner break. All waste wrappings and waste food must be
taken to and
deposited in the outside dustbins, adjacent to the garages, before the
end of
the break. No food may be kept anywhere on the premises overnight.
SCHEDULES
42. Be on time for class and all assignments.
43. Buy any books you need from the invoice clerk from 12.00 - 1.00
and 2.50 -
3.00 and at no other time.
44. Follow all schedules exactly.
45. Study and work during your class periods and over weekends. You
have a lot
to get checked out on in order to get a course completion. You can't
afford to
waste time.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mh.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
460
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 JUNE 1965
Saint Hill
Grads after
Jan 64
ALL GRADS SINCE JAN 64
Tech Div
R6EW
The R6 EW materials and L4 & L6 ARC Break Lists have been sent
to all
SHSBC grads since Jan 1964.
These materials are issued to them for use on their own cases.
They may have the Solo Audit HCOBs as well.
They may not use these materials on the public. Serious damage
has been
done by two US Auditors defying policy on using R6 on raw meat with
resultant
spins and illnesses.
Do not print or publish or give it to others.
Read the material carefully and follow it exactly.
Those SHSBC grads who have used it report remarkable success
with it and I
am happy to have trained them well enough to make it possible to use
it on
themselves.
There is not and never will be a public application to pc by
auditor use
of clearing. The nature of the process forbids it. Releasing is for
the
untrained. Clearing can be attained only through training as the pcs
don't know
enough about life to know how to handle their bank in any way.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:wmc.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
461
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 JULY 1965
Issue III
Sthil
Sthil Students
COURSE R6 AUDITING
The HCO Policy Letter of 13 April 1965 which restricts the
auditing of R6
to training premises is cancelled.
R6 auditing may be conducted either on the premises or off the
premises.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 AUGUST 1965
Saint Hill
Executive Staff only
TECHNICAL QUERIES FROM R6 GRADUATES
Letters from R6 Grads concerning technical reports on their
auditing and
technical queries concerning R6 EW should be routed to the Technical
Secretary
for answering. These letters may be typed in typing poo1 if Tech
Division has no
typist of their own.
In answering these letters, the Technical Secretary should
follow Policy
on the answering of Technical queries. The Technical Secretary must
take care
never to ignore any expressed want in the letter and to refer the
graduate
wherever possible to the Advanced Scheduling Registrar for scheduling
for HGC
Saint Hill, retread or interneship.
If there is an expressed want to set up a City Office or forming
Org this
should be referred to HCO for handling.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
462
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 SEPTEMBER 1965
Saint Hill only
SHSBC Students
CLASSIFICATION REQUIRED BEFORE MOVING
TO NEXT LEVEL
The Saint Hill Special Briefing Course Levels 0 through IV is a
Review
Course at a high professional level.
Although Classification is an award, because of the degree of
excellence
of auditing required at Level VI, Saint. Hill students are required to
get
classification at the lower levels.
Students are required to complete the Theory Checksheet at each
level and
attain certification before going into the Practical Section for that
level.
Students MUST complete the full Practical requirements including the
auditing
requirement and attain Classification for that level before moving on
to the
Theory Section of the next level up. This makes for an orderly
progression
through the course and will be found to be to the students' advantage
to not be
tied up in incomplete cycles of action while trying to study for
higher levels.
If a student flunks his classification written exam or the
examination of
his auditing via his auditing reports, the student is to review his
theory, then
his practical, as well as submit further auditing evidence (auditor's
reports)
before re-examination.
In the Practical Section of each level, the student is to do his
auditing
requirement on his own responsibility during the evenings or weekends
and have
the auditing requirement completed by the time he has completed his
practical
checksheet. If the student has failed to do this, he will have to
review the
Theory for that level, as well as the Practical, as it will be
conceived that
the student's confidence in his material for the level is lacking to
the extent
that he has not reached for, found and audited a preclear.
The student is expected to complete the theory checksheet for
each level
in two weeks. He is expected to complete the Practical checksheet for
each level
in two weeks. Any student -failing to do this has a down statistic and
is to be
sent to Cramming. Any student who flunks an examination is sent to
Cramming. Any
student who fails to have the auditing requirement done by the time
his
practical checksheet is done (and thus must review the entire level)
is sent to
Cramming.
Any student, who, at the date of this Policy Letter has been
working at a
level that he or she is not Classified up to the next level below, is
given a
grace period of two weeks exactly to 'catch up' on Classification.
Student
attention is called to HCO Policy Letter of 23 August AD 15-
Classification at
Upper Levels-Temporary Measure.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
463
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo (Amends HCO Policy Letter of
Sthil Scientology Staff 27 February 1965)
Sthil Students
Franchise
COURSE PATTERN
The Saint Hill Special Briefing Course is to be organized as
follows:
It will be divided into four units. These units are:
Unit A covering Level 0
Unit B covering Levels I and II
Unit C covering Levels III and IV
Unit D covering Level VI.
One Supervisor is in charge of each unit. He or she is
responsible for the
theory and practical supervision and all other training and discipline
matters
relating to that student for the duration of his progress up through
the levels
covered by that Unit.
A student in a unit is classed for the level he or she has
completed but
the student in a unit is designated for the classes being studied for
as
follows:
A 0 Class Zero Unit A Pavilion
B I Class I Unit B Chapel
B II Class II Unit B Chapel
C III Class III Unit C Pavilion
C IV Class IV Unit C Pavilion
D VI Class VI Hall
----------
A Supervisor is assigned to each of A, B, C and D, four
Supervisors in
all. The course is headed by the Director of Training.
While progressing toward his Classification for each level the
student is
under only one supervisor.
----------
On enrolling the student is not given an examination for
placement but is
checked for valid enrollment prerequisites (which remains HCA) and is
entered
into Unit A which consists of a check sheet for theory and practical.
Materials
include orientation at Saint Hill, vocabulary materials, etc, to
safeguard
against previously misunderstood words.
When the student has completed his theory check sheet, he is
routed to the
Director of Examinations, Qualifications Division, to attest that he
has done
so. He then receives his Certification for the level and is promoted
to the
Practical work of the Level. Once he has received Certification for a
Level, he
is permitted to audit an outside pc to Release on that Level.
When he has completed his Practical check sheet and achieved the
Release
of his pc, he presents his auditor's report to Dir Exams. When this
report has
been accepted as satisfactory by Dir Exams, the student may sit for
written
examinations on the Level.
If the examination is not passed, the student remains in the
Qualifications Division in the Cramming Section at a charge of �2 per
day until
he is able to pass an Exam on the Level.
464
When the Examination is passed, the student receives
Classification for
the Level just completed and moves into the next level.
This same procedure is followed through all the levels on
upward,
Certified, then Classed at each level.
Saint Hill is a briefing and review course and the check sheets
are not
the check sheets of an Academy for the same class and grade,
containing only
vital materials.
A student can have a classification examination for IV or below
any time
he or she wishes, regardless of course status or unit.
Any existing classification is laid aside for-course duration at
this time
(but is reinstated at course end, even though the student will
probably be well
above it) as the final materials now in existence are new and quite
stable and
students need the briefing.
On termination the highest classification obtained on the course
will be
actually made up in full and signed. This is usually Prov Class VI.
However the
student is owed only the highest certificate attained as classing is
entirely
optional with the Dir Exams always.
A student may go as high as he likes on this course but must be
a valid
HCA to enroll. However our oldest rule holds. Anyone can have an HCA
who can
pass the HCA examination, which today is the examination for Class II.
But it
would be a good idea for anyone trying for an HCA by examination only
to be
examined for it by his nearest HCO first.
It is the full intention of the course to round out all those
small bits
missed in former study.
Previous estimates of time on course may have to be revised.
Amount of
materials from Zero to IV have reduced and the length of time spent on
R6
materials and-solo auditing is only a few weeks. Level VII is not part
of the
present course and will not be. It constitutes another course, since
it is
taught under entirely different conditions.
Academies will probably be following this same pattern up to IV
except
that each level will be separately enrolled for and delivered in the
longer
period of one month. Therefore the Saint Hill Course, originally
designed to
improve auditing over the world, having done so has to be taught now
in this
fashion to give old auditors a look in at each level so they can audit
and teach
it and newer ones a chance to be thorough and catch up on any bits
skimped.
Training is otherwise unchanged. And the materials of VI have
been
relatively stable for over a year and IV and below Complete and
stable.
Therefore, shifting technology is no longer a student problem, for
there is no
reason to shift it when it's the shortest proven way. Printed texts
will take a
long time to prepare and issue. But meanwhile, it's all here at Saint
Hill.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
465
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 FEBRUARY 1966
Applies to
Sthil only
Exec Sec
Tech Sec Qual and Tech Divs
D of T
Course Supervisors
Mimeo SH
Qual Sec & Qual Staff CHECK SHEETS, COURSE
THEORY COURSES
The check sheets of the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Theory Courses
will be changed as fast as is feasible to The Library Lists HCOB 30
November
1965.
These will be on a Zero rate.
Only the vital points like Axioms, Scales and key processes and
Model
Session are Star-Rated and these must be picked out and pointed up on
the Check
Sheets by the Tech Sec.
The Tech Sec is responsible for making up check sheets from the
Library
List omitting only any totally irrelevant HCOBs or books or pamphlets
but
keeping the amount of material as large as possible.
Obviously a student cannot have a copy of each bulletin or
pamphlet so
they are made up into sections of the level in a folder and the
student hands it
in when he has read it and it is reused. Students may buy copies of
bulletins
they want at the usual price and must pay for any they lose.
Tape check sheets will remain as they are at this time but will
be added
to when the Tape Library List is completed.
PRACTICAL COURSES
The Practical Courses will include the use of a doll. All
auditing actions
must be letter perfect using the doll before the Auditor is permitted
a live pc.
A Grade Released pc for the level is required for the
Classification to be
assigned.
LEVEL VI
Level VI must include the entirety of the Whole Track materials
assembled
by M. Routsong and boxed.
These are Zero rated.
Practical for the Level consists of finding and running late
implants on
another pc for which the plot is known and given.
Solo Auditing Theory materials are then studied.
Practical is completed by Solo Auditing to Grade VI Release.
Persons taking this course with no earlier training must be
given an E-
Meter Check Sheet, rudimentary TRs and some Model Session before doing
any of
the above.
WARNING
There are two kinds of theory training. One is to go over a
little
material but very thoroughly. We have lately been doing this. The
other method
which I favour and have the best success with, is to go over LOTS of
material
lightly and swiftly and then go over a very small amount of very
important
material thoroughly.
466
Thus this is a shift in gears for Course Supervisors and they
must not get
in the students' way in going over lots of material beyond being sure
it is
actually covered and no misunderstood words exist in it. And they must
be plain
murder on the small bits that are Star rated. Axioms by heart mean
Axioms by
Heart and no "Ah --- er
Remember that anyone enrolling in the SHSBC has been through the
featherweight, small check sheet Academy Courses. These people lack a
broad
command of the subject. So we will give it to them.
EXAMINERS
STUDENTS
The method of student examination is changed herewith.
THEORY
The Certificate Exam shall consist of:
1. Assurance the student has covered the broad body of data;
2. Assurance the student can parrot the Star Rated bits
quickly, and -
3. The student is not all at sea about the principles of the
level and
why it -is a level.
4. The student can demonstrate the principles.
PRACTICAL
The student examiner on a Classification Exam must be sure the
student can
1. Go through the motions of an auditor for that level;
2. Answer up to some practical questions about what to do;
3. Show evidence of having released a pc at that level and in a
very
proper, uncopied report.
The 5 GAEs if they appear at any time at any level constitute a
flunk of
the examination.
Examinations should only be carried on to a point where the
Examiner knows
whether the student doesn't know or knows but examination should be
quite
pitiless.
An Examiner finding a student is obviously too bad should always
send the
student to Review for an Assist before sending to Cramming.
The Assist should handle ARC Breaks and misunderstoods before
anything
else.
Only flunking incorrectly or passing incorrectly upsets
students. The
truth leaves them cheerful. Whatever else happens.
----------
These changes are not so much changes as you think. The original
method of
teaching the SHSBC is being resumed.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
467
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 AUGUST 1966
Sthill only
All Staff
ROUTING AND HANDLING OF SHSBC STUDENTS
ANY STUDENT ON THE DAY SHSBC IS FIRST AND FOREMOST A STUDENT.
This rule is true regardless of what other activities they
undertake on
their own time.
No student may hold a post on the Foundation, if, in the opinion
of the
Supervisor, it interferes with the student's progress on course.
Any student holding a Foundation post must be immediately
replaced if
course progress is being impeded.
ORDERS AND ROUTING
Any orders or routings given to a student by another section of
the Org
which will interfere with course hours must be done via the Tech Sec,
D of T,
and the Course Supervisor of the student concerned.
The sole intention of the latter is to prevent students from
"disappearing" from course into the HGC, Review, or anywhere else,
without the
Supervisor having directly sent the Student.
LRH:ec.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1966
Remimeo All Staff
and Students
REQUIREMENT FOR TERMINATION ON THE SHSBC
AND ENROLMENT ON SOLO COURSE
It has been observed that among the early Clears Grade VA
Release was an
important gradient toward the achievement of Clear.
This Grade is no longer to be omitted by those who wish to enrol
on the
Clearing Course.
It is now required that all students achieve Grade VA Release as
well as
Grade V before they may terminate from the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course.
It is also a requisite that all students enrolling on the Solo
Course be
Grade V and Grade VA Release.
The gradient from Grade V to Solo Auditing and then the Clearing
Course
will then be much smoother and easier.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
468
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 OCTOBER 1966
Unit Supers
Students
SH Only
Ad Council
Qual Sec
Tech Sec STUDENTS-TERMINATING
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
BLOWN STUDENTS
I. Students Terminating
Any student terminating the SHSBC, the Solo Audit Course, or the
Ministers
Course is to get an end of course clean-up by a qualified fellow
student on a
June 26 Form run as Auditing by List.
The D of T is responsible for seeing that this policy letter is
put into
effect.
Any student routing form now in use should be modified to
include this
step. The Unit Supervisor is to sign in the proper place. - - -
In case of difficulty in the cleaning up of the form, the
student should
be routed to the Dept of Review for a formal review session. -
Ethics cannot OK the termination without the form signed by the
Unit
Supervisor, whether a review session occurred or not in the Dept of
Review.
II. Leave of Absence
(a) Any student wanting to leave course should be treated as a
kind of
blow- and sent to Review. Only after a review can any leave of absence
be
granted by the Tech Sec, on D of T's advice and after an Ethics
clearance. Valid
evidence of the necessity for a leave must be presented by the
student. In no
case can it exceed two weeks- exceptional leave of absence exceeding a
two week
period can only be granted by the Ad Council upon presentation of
strong
evidence of the necessity for such and after - the above routine has
been gone
through.
(b) A short leave of absence of a day or so can be granted by
the Unit
Supervisor without any further okay than by the Dir of Training.
III. Blown Students
Blown students are handled as per HCO Pol Ltr of April 5, 1965,
HCO
Justice Data re Academy & HGC-Handling the Suppressive Person, Volume
1, page
381- "The Blown Student", and any other policy letters dealing with
suppressive
acts.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lb-r.rd
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
469
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 OCTOBER 1966
Issue V
Remimeo
SHSBC Students
SOLO Students
Franchise
FSMs
BP!
DURATION OF SHSBC AND SOLO COURSE REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements will assure a fast flow through the
SHSBC and
Solo Course, and will result in well grounded auditors and solo
auditors who can
really handle the materials covered.
SHSBC REQUIREMENTS
Certification for Level 0, including the Dianetic Course and
Dissem Drill,
to be completed in 7 weeks and Classification in 2 weeks.
The other Levels up to Level VI are to be completed within 3
weeks for
each Certification and 2 weeks for each Classification.
Both the Certification and Classification requirements for Level
VI must
be completed in a period not exceeding 5 (five) weeks for each.
SOLO COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Solo Course Students, by the nature of their course, are to
complete a
minimum number of actions within a specific time, to wit:
Zero checkouts 25 daily
Star-rated checkouts 2 daily
Tapes to be listened to 2 daily.
These are minimum requirements only and a fast student will
discover that
he can complete much faster. This is the road to freedom and OT, and
the faster
we move, the sooner we'll have a clear planet.
L. RON
HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rd.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
470
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 DECEMBER 1966
Students
Foundation
Training
WHAT THE SHSBC STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT FOUNDATION
As part of your requirements as a student is auditing the
general public,
you need to know the following:
1. Having disseminated and found your pc, before you audit him on
any
process, put in a good Reality Factor on the Gradation Chart,
the various
levels he will be audited through, and the fact that he will
have to come
to the Organization for-a Release check. Also you must tell him
that it
might be necessary for him to have Review auditing, and this
costs money;
so bridge him in on this point.
2. After auditing your pc to Release, you bring him into the
Reception in the
Foundation either in the weekdays between 7:30 p.m. to 10:00
p.m., or
weekends from 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. It is necessary that you
accompany
him into Reception and take his folder in with you. You also
wait in
Reception until he has had his declare. If all goes well, that
is the end
of that cycle. If not, he will not be too surprised at the
Review action
as you have explained it to him in the beginning.
3. The best dissemination is books. If your pc has read something,
he will
have more reality on the auditing and the Organization. Get him
to buy a
book.
4. Take or send your pc to a PR Course. This is a free service and
will not
lose you your pc. You may continue auditing him up to Level IV.
5. When your pc has come up through the grades and has become
interested in
going further in Scientology Training or Processing, you select
him for
the rest of the Services he requires.
Dalene Regenass D/Qual F
Julia Galpin D/HCO F
Julia Galpin Ad
Council F
Julia Galpin LRH Comm
F
Jill van Staden)
Otto Roos ) Ad
Council SH
Ken Delderfield LRH Comm
SH
Leon Steinberg)
J.J. Delance ) Ad
Council WW
Philip Quirino LRH Comm
WW
Mary Sue Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) l966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
471
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 FEBRUARY 1968
Gen Non-Remimeo
SHSBC Students
SH Tech & Qual Staff
SH Foundation
FAST FLOW FOR SHSBC STUDENTS' PRECLEARS
Amends HCO Pol. Letter 30 Dec. 1966
1. The supreme policy being: RAPIDITY OF PARTICLE FLOW ALONE
DETERMINES
POWER, it is imperative that the preclear, once the completion
is reached,
immediately continues the routing on lines and finishes the
cycle he is
on.
2. Therefore, any stops put forward by the insistence that a SHSBC
Student's
preclear should wait until the evening or even the week-end for
the
Declaration of his grade or grades on foundation lines, instead
of day
lines is a violation of the Fast Flow System and constitutes use
of policy
to stop a flow.
3. Therefore in future preclears are to be put on lines for
declaration of a
grade or grades without any delay on lines whatsoever.
Blanka Annakin Public
Exec Sec SH
Edie Hoyseth Qual Sec
SH
Bene Neal HCO Area
Sec SH
Monica Quirino HCO Exec
Sec SH
Herbie Parkhouse Org Exec
Sec SH
Ken Urquhart LRH Comm
SH
Anne Tampion D/HCO
Exec Sec WW
Allan Ferguson Org Exec
Sec WW
Tony Dunleavy Public
Exec Sec WW
Ken Delderfield LRH Comm
WW
Joan McNocher Dep
Guardian WW
Mary Sue Hubbard The
Guardian WW
LRH:jc.rd
Copyright ($) 1968 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
472
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 OCTOBER 1965
Remimeo
Tech Div
Qual Div.
Dissem Div
SAINT HILL SOLO AUDIT COURSE
(Effective 1 November 1965)
OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO POWER PROCESSING
PRECLEARS
Solo Audit Course is inaugurated at Saint Hill for those non-
professional
preclears who, obtaining Grade V Release, wish to go on to Grade VI
and Grade
VII.
It is to be fully understood that this course applies only to
solo audit
and gives no auditor certificate but only a grade of Release
certificate when
complete. A person taking this course is not to audit others above any
auditor
class the student actually holds.
It is further to be fully understood that any trouble the solo
auditor
gets into must be resolved by a proper Class VI auditor in an
organization and
that such assistance is at the student's own expense and is not part
of the
offered courses. Such help is called A SOLO AUDITOR ASSIST and is
charged at
existing auditor rates by the whole hour for all hours and any part of
an hour.
Such SOLO AUDITOR ASSISTS are normally given by the QUALIFICATIONS
DIVISION.
They consist of by-passed charge assessments using standard lists,
track
analysis to find where the solo auditor has gotten to and case
analysis to
discover what is wrong. They also include rehabilitation of a release
state
overrun. They do not consist of auditing the materials for the grade.
SOLO AUDIT COURSE
GRADE VI
Prerequisite: Grade V Release. Full and unqualified Ethics
Clearance.
This course consists of the following:
The parts of life-thetan, body, mind, physical universe,
engrams.
Vocabulary for parts of the E-Meter.
Elementary E-Metering.
Elementary Solo Auditing on PTPs, etc.
Keeping an Auditor's Report.
The history of Dianetics and Scientology.
Vocabulary for the bank as used in the film The Pattern of the
Bank.
The film The Pattern of the Bank - and any other pertinent film
with full
checkouts On its data (not just viewed).
Whole track data.
R6 EW technology.
Solo Auditing to Grade VI Release.
Release Certification when attained.
When this course is completed, the Grade VI Release is eligible
to enroll
on the Saint Hill Clearing Course on a solo audit basis for Grade VII
Clear. No
other certificate will be given than a grade certificate. And the
person is
given no right to audit others. But the person may attain Clear by
this route.
(Note: This is the non-professional route specified in the
earlier
Gradation programmes.)
473
ARRANGEMENTS
The Solo Audit Course Grade VI will be taught in the Technical
Division
Department of Training Saint Hill. It will be called Unit E-One and
will be
handled by the E-Unit Course Supervisor who, in case of numbers, may
have an E-
One. Supervisor under him to handle this course.
This course absorbs the R6 EW Short Course taught to org
executives who
were not properly classed for the Saint Hill Course. All students of
the R6 EW
Short Course are transferred to the Solo Audit Course, the materials
being
similar.
The course has already been piloted and was found to be
successful.
This course in no way supplants the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course or
Academy Courses 0-TV and the student is warned that the course is
designed to
make him or her only a solo auditor and in no way prepares one to
audit others
or handle others with Scientology and that if any certification or
Classification or full understanding of technology is required the
student of
the Solo Audit Course will have to begin with lower classification
training. It
is however admitted that a Grade VI Release would have little trouble
with the
lower levels of training and that a Clear would have no trouble at
all.
SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS
Where a person has gone Grade VI Release by reason of earlier
auditing on
goals as happened occasionally prior to 1965 (they had gone up through
all
grades unknowingly and these were rehabilitated after the fact) the
student yet
must successfully complete the Solo Audit Course in order to qualify
for the
Clearing Course and in no case will anyone be enrolled on the Clearing
Course
unless the Solo Audit Course has been passed.
Persons enrolled on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course take
a longer
professional version of the Solo Audit Course as part of their
training and as
covered by their enrollment fee at this time.
The price of the Solo Audit Course is �275.
An additional fee of �275 is required for the Clearing Course.
An HCA certificate from an Academy is required to enroll on the
Saint Hill
Special Briefing Course.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 NOVEMBER 1965
St Hill only
TRANSFERS FROM SHSBC TO SOLO AUDIT COURSE
Students wishing to transfer from the SHSBC to the Solo Audit
Course may
do so only with permission of LRH.
Full credit is allowed for any sums not consumed by the Saint
Hill Special
Briefing Course.
Compute as follows-Number of weeks on SHSBC times � 11.9.2
subtracted from
�275 equals amount to be credited toward the Solo Audit Course.
LRH:ml.kd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
474
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1967
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
SOLO AUDITING FOLDERS
After completion of the student's solo auditing requirements his
auditing
folder is not to be given to the student to take away or keep as it is
the
record -of a student's Grade VI auditing and as such must remain at
Saint Hill.
The folder must be filed safely at Saint Hill by Technical Services as
the
folder contains confidential data and also could at some later date be
needed
for reason of review of the Grade.
A student's solo audit course examinations may not be given to
the student
to take home but must be kept in the Qualifications Division Dept of
Examinations. The examination is handed back to the student-after the
examination has taken place for reference but must always be promptly
returned.
It is the responsibility of the examiner to see that Level VI exam
sheets are
returned by the student.
Written by a Board of Investigation:
Chairman -Monica Quirino
Secretary -Dalene Regenass
Member -David Ziff
LRHjp rd Mary Sue Hubbard
Copyright ($) 1967 The Guardian WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 NOVEMBER 1967
Solo Course Students
Level VI Students
R 6 MATERIALS
THE MATERIALS OF R 6 ARE TOTALLY CONFIDENTIAL. THEY ARE TO BE KEPT
SECURE AT
ALL TIMES.
This means that the only people who may talk about or be talked
to about,
or may see these materials are those people who are on the Solo Course
or Level
VI and those people who are already Grade VI or Class VI or above. No
one else
may see these materials. If left at home, they are to be kept under
lock and
key.
Responsibility for these materials lies completely with the
students they
belong to. Violation of this policy in any way, such as losing any of
these
materials or leaving them lying around, will incur severe Ethics
action.
Chief Solo Course Sup : Malcolm
Cheminais
Director of Training : Dalene
Regenass
Tech Sec SH : Allan
Ferguson
Qual Sec SH : Helen Pollen
HCO Area Sec SH : Bene Neal
Chairman, Ad Council SH : Helen Pollen
Exec Council SH : J.J. Delance
Barbara
Gentry
Pub Exec Sec SH : Rosalie
Vosper
LRH Comm SH : Irene
Dunleavy
Chairman, Ad Council WW : Mike
Davidson
Exec Council WW : Lenka
Marinko
Tony
Dunleavy
LRH Comm WW : Ken
Delderfield
D/Guardian WW : Joan
McNocher
LRH:jp.rd Mary Sue Hubbard
Copyright ($) 1967 The Guardian WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
475
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 DECEMBER 1965
Saint Hill only
STAFF ON SAINT HILL CLEARING COURSE
In accordance with long standing solo audit policy:
At least 5 hours of auditing must be done a week by the Saint
Hill Staff
on the Clearing Course: The reports and materials of these sessions
must be
handed to the Clearing Course Supervisor each week.
Failure to comply with this will result in being sent to review
at own
expense.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:emp.kd
Copyright ($) 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 JANUARY 1966
Remimeo
Dist Staff
Students
REGULATIONS FOR AUDITING OF STAFF
AND STUDENTS
In HCO Pol Ltr of 24 May 1965 Student Guide to Acceptable
Behaviour, it
states under # 15, "Do not give any processing to anyone under any
circumstances
without direct permission of the Course Supervisor (Emergency Assists
excepted)", and #16, "Do not receive any processing from anyone under
any
circumstances without the express permission of the Course Supervisor"
(flow D
of T).
In HCO Po1 Ltr of 1 April 1960 Regulations for Staff Members and
Ex-Staff
Members, # 2, "Any Staff Member of the organization may not audit any
current
preclear or student unless that preclear or student has been signed up
for
processing in the Hubbard Guidance Centre by the Registrar and has
been assigned
the auditor by the Director of Processing" (now HGC Admin).
These policies are still in effect. Any Staff Member, student or
Interne
requiring an assist or Review (unless an Emergency) must notify their
Dept Head
who arranges with Qualifications Div, Dept of Review for an assist to
be given
if the Dept Head deems it necessary.
The only exception is the Clearing Course Student who is handled
entirely
by the Clearing Course Supervisor and may not be audited, sent to
Review, or
given an assist (except in an Emergency like an Injury) by anyone. The
Clearing
Course Supervisor is notified if a Clearing Course student is having
difficulty
with their case at home, at work, etc and the Clearing Course
Supervisor handles
it.
LRH:ml.cden L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
476
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 FEBRUARY 1966
Clearing Course
Students
CLEARING COURSE
SUBMISSION OF FOLDERS
Every Clearing Course Student away from Saint Hill must send
their folder,
or a written report about their auditing, to the Clearing Course
Supervisor,
Saint Hill. This information must be received once a month.
Non-compliance will result in the Student being classed as a
blown Student
and he or she will be handled as such.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 FEBRUARY 1966
Issue II
Clearing Course
Students
CLEARING COURSE
WEEKLY AUDITING HOURS
All non-Saint Hill Staff Clearing Course Students who are
working at Saint
Hill as Internes, or in any other post, before returning to their
countries,
must complete 5 hours of auditing a week.
Non-compliance will result in the Student being sent to Review
at his or
her own expense.
The folders must be given to the Clearing Course Supervisor
every
Thursday.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L. 14 October 1966, Clearing Course Folders, page
481.]
477
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 MARCH 1966
Remimeo
Franchise
Auditor 14
BPI AMNESTY
Celebrating the First real Clear made on the Saint Hill Clearing
Course, a
general amnesty is ordered.
Any and all persons who have been dead filed or declared
suppressive are
included in. this amnesty providing they report to the HCO Area
Secretary in
their nearest organization and obtain a clearance from her and an
auditing check
in the Department of Review.
I have no wish to have any organization stand in anyone's way on
the Road
to Clear. The complete route is available and proven. It is time to
settle all
differences for the day of total freedom is here.
With this amnesty I wish to thank from the bottom of my heart
those who
helped, and I wish to hold no rancor for those who in ignorance of
what we
sought, may have hindered us-the time is long over when we could be
stopped.
All actions or intentions before this date are freely forgiven.
LRH:ml.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 APRIL 1966
Gen Non-Remimeo
St Hill
Clearing Course Students
ETHICS: CLEARING COURSE
Whenever a Clearing Course Student is found guilty by Ethics of
serious
non compliance of Clearing Course instructions, blowing from Course,
Misuse of
Clearing Course material, communicating about the Clearing Course to
anyone
(which includes Clearing Course students) other than the Clearing
Course
Supervisor or a Review auditor properly assigned to the case or of any
action
resulting in action having to be taken by Ethics, an Ethics
investigation is to
be ordered immediately by the HCO Exec Sec, St Hill to find who was
responsible
for allowing such a security risk on to the Clearing Course and make
recommendations.
The Clearing Course Supervisor may demand of the HCO Exec Sec
that a
Committee of Evidence be called if he/she is of the opinion that the
security of
the Clearing Course is threatened and no action is being taken.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Revised to include Advanced Courses by HCO P/L 12 August 1971 Issue V
(corrected & reissued 24 October 1971), Ethics: Advanced Courses, in
the 1971
Year Book.]
478
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 AUGUST 1966
Remimeo
ETHICS
CLEARS, INVALIDATION OF
Spreading false tales to invalidate Clears is a High Crime.
Anyone found spreading libelous and slanderous statements about
the
alleged behavior of Clears shall be declared Suppressive at once by
the first
Ethics Officer so hearing of the matter. Investigation should take the
form of
looking for a criminal background on the person spreading such
rumours.
For sixteen years I have been subjected to this type of attack.
Now it is
being transferred to Clears by Suppressive Persons..
Such attacks are born out of terror of having anyone better or
stronger.
This is the basic motivation of any SP.
It has been a hard task to bring the shreds of civilization to a
scientific barbarism known as "Western Culture".
Quite obviously it will require a long time to get Ethics in on
this
society. We have not been tough enough.
So get tough.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lb-r.cden
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER 0F 8 AUGUST 1966
Gen-Non Remimeo
OT COLOUR FLASH
COLOUR FLASH ADDITION
Clear is a green flash mark or green envelope, confidential to
keep people
from looking at the contents and getting sick or worse.
OT (Operating Thetan) Course materials AND COMMUNICATIONS shall
be gold
striped on white or manila or gold envelopes. The clue is GOLD.
Clear-Dark green stripe or envelope.
OT-Gold stripe or envelope.
Communications so marked MUST NOT BE OPENED by any but Clearing
Course, OT
Course or OT Base Personnel.
LRH:lb-r.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
479
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Gen Non HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 AUGUST AD 16
Remimeo
OT Course Students Issue II
Clearing Course Students
All Staff
Post Public Bull. Board THE OPERATING THETAN COURSE
in Each Org
The UT Course has started. It is available by invitation by Part
only.
Once a person has attained the State of Clear, he does not immediately
become
eligible to enrol on the UT Course. He or she may be invited to enrol
in Part 1.
The OT Course is divided into levels. Each level is called a
Part.
Enrolment in each Part will be by invitation only.
The reason for this is that for the first time in this universe
we are
making real cleared (not keyed Out) OTs. The power of these beings
will be
unlimited. This whole operation must be done in an organised manner,
and it is
expected of the beings on the OT Course that Scientology Ethics Codes
will be
always applied and followed. For example, an OT or UT Course Student
would be
expected never to attack another being or group unless that being or
group had
been formally declared suppressive by our Ethics Section. Also it is
intended
that there will be no leakage of upper level confidential materials
which could
be used destructively by suppressive persons or groups.
If a person has shown by his past actions that he cannot be
trusted to
follow the Ethics Codes of Scientology, he will not thereafter be
invited to
enrol on Part 1 of the OT Course, for it would be to invite disaster
to do so.
We intend to "Bring Order" to this universe. And we shall do so.
LRH:lb-r.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 AUGUST 1966
Ethics Hats Issue II
Clearing Course
Super
Clearing Course CLEARING COURSE SECURITY
If any Ethics Officer receives a report that a Clearing Course
Student is
engaging in activities such as to indicate that he or she is a
potential
security risk with regard to Clearing Course materials, the Ethics
Officer must
immediately cable the Clearing Course Supervisor at Saint Hill giving
brief
details, and airmail full details immediately.
Any sort of squirrel activity, contact with declared SPs or
Suppressive
Groups, entheta about or enturbulation of Scientology Orgs, or failure
to report
or communicate promptly to the local Ethics Officer when so requested,
would be
grounds for suspicion. Unsolicited receipt of mailings from a
Suppressive Group
would not, particularly if turned in unread to the Ethics Officer.
The Clearing Course Supervisor, on receipt of such a report,
immediately
cables the Ethics Officer to collect the student's materials and
forward them to
Saint Hill. The Ethics Officer may deputize any person qualified to
handle such
materials, but must comply immediately.
Meanwhile a full investigation into the allegations against the
Clearing
Course student is done and speedily completed. The findings are
reported by
airmail to the Clearing Course Supervisor.
If the allegations are found to be totally untrue, then the
person making
them is subject to severe Ethics action, since he has wasted a
Clearing Course
student's auditing time and slowed him down on the road to Clear.
LRH:ec.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
480
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1966
Clearing
Course
Students
CLEARING COURSE FOLDERS
(This Pol Ltr cancels the Pol Ltr
of 3 February 1966, "Clearing Course,
Weekly Auditing Hours")
All Saint Hill Staff and Internes for Saint Hill and all other
organisations who are on the Clearing Course, must bring their folders
in on
Tuesday to Reception at 9.30 AM. Their folders will be returned to
them later
that same day.
All other Clearing Course students who are living in the East
Grinstead
area and who are not staff members must bring in their folders every
Thursday to
Reception at 9.30 AM. Their folders will be returned to them at 2.30
PM in
Reception.
A student may, of course, bring in his folder for the Clearing
Course
Supervisor, to the Reception at 9.30 AM any day when he needs more
materials or
is in trouble.
All students must complete 5 hours of auditing a week.
Non-compliance will result in the student being sent to Review
at his or
her own cost.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lb-r.aap
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
481
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 NOVEMBER 1966
Remimeo
Clearing Course
Students
Clearing Course
Personnel
Clear Checkers
Div Organizer Qual WW
CLEAR CHECK-OUTS IN CONTINENTAL ORGS
The Clearing Course is available ONLY at Saint Hill. However, a
student
who comes to Saint Hill to enrol in and start the Clearing Course may
then
return to his home and continue it by correspondence. He may then,
when Clear,
obtain a Clear Check at his appointed Continental Organization.
In order to speed up the checking out of Clears residing in
other
countries and to handle the tremendous flow of Clears that is
occurring, and in
the interest of economy for students, personnel have been appointed in
certain
Continental Orgs to perform this duty.
When an overseas student sends in his folder to the Clearing
Course
Supervisor WW requesting a Clear Check the Clearing Course Supervisor
examines
the folder, and if satisfied that the student is ready for a Clear
Check,
initiates a Routing Form for a Continental Clear Check. This routing
form then
goes airmail immediately with the student's complete folder to the
Continental
Clear Checker concerned and the Clearing Course Supervisor at the same
time
writes to the student informing him that he will be contacted by the
Continental
Clear Checker.
The Continental Clear Checker, upon receipt of the routing form
and
folder, telegraphs the student to come in for a Clear Check.
Upon arrival at the Continental Org an amount of �27.0.0 (or the
equivalent in local currency) must be paid in to the Area Cashier by
the
student. � 12.0.0 must be transferred IMMEDIATELY to Saint Hill to
cover the
postage and handling costs that have been incurred in airmailing the
student's
complete folder to the Continental Organization and � 12.0.0 is
retained to
cover the Continental Org's expenses in returning the folder to Saint
Hill.
Balance of �3.0.0 comprises the Continental Organization's Clear Check
fee.
When the Checkout has been completed and the student has been
announced
Clear, a cable is sent to the Clearing Course Supervisor WW announcing
the
following facts:
1. Name of Clear.
2. TA position.
3. Where the Clear received his early training.
The Continental Clear Check routing form is then completed and
sent to the
Clearing Course Supervisor WW complete with the student's complete
folder and
all reports and materials used in the Checkout.
Every Continental Clear Checker must have completed the
following steps
before being allowed to check out a Clear:
1. Checked out thoroughly on all Clearing Course Tech
Materials.
2. Checked out on the Clearing Course remedies.
3. Checked out on the Clear Check Hat.
Training of a Clear Checker is done under the Supervision of the
Divisional Organizer, Qual WW.
Having been checked out Clear, if the person is invited on the
OT Course
Part One, enrollment can be handled by mail from Saint Hill.
LRH:jd.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
482
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 NOVEMBER AD16
(Replaces HCO Policy Letter of 12 August AD 16)
Remimeo
OT COURSE
The OT Course has been inaugurated as of 10 August AD 16.
This Course is by invitation only and by invitation to each
separate part
of the Course.
It is only open to Clears who must have been checked out Clear
by the
Saint Hill Qualifications Division or at the appointed Continental
Organization
authorized to give Clear Checks. .
The invitation to the Course or to any succeeding part depends
on several
factors.:
1. Security of R6EW, Class VII and Clearing materials in the
student's
hands.
2. Degree of participation the being has engaged in in
Scientology.
3. The general character of the being as a Scientologist, based
on his
Ethics record.
4. The Scientology technical proficiency of the being.
If an invitation is not received a petition may be submitted to
the Office
of LRH, setting forth evidence as to why one should be invited.
LRH:jp.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: The 14 Nov '66 revision was inclusion in third paragraph of
Clear Checks
given at authorized Continental Organizations. This P/L was later
revised and
reissued as HCO P/L 12 August 1971 Issue IV, OT Courses, in the 1971
Year Book.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 DECEMBER 1966
Sthil only
WW and SH Execs
Ethics
Cont Clear Checkers
Cl Cse Personnel
Cl Cse Students
CLEARING COURSE REGULATION
A Clearing Course student is not officially Clear before being
pronounced
so by a qualified checker and Qual and may not announce the fact as a
fact until
so checked by an authorized Clear Checker who has actually officially
checked
him out and until he/she has been declared Clear by Qualifications
Division SH.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jp.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
483
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JANUARY 1967
Remimeo
Franchise
FSMs
All Students
All Preclears
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL CLEARS
You are a Clear. Well done and congratulations.
This state has not previously been attained in this universe and
we must
all work towards getting more people-many more people-up to this
level.
Essentially, you are clear on the 1st Dynamic and still have a lot of
work in
front of you to attain OT, which is to say the remaining dynamics, but
nevertheless you will find you have many abilities hitherto undreamed
of. An
ethical code already exists for OTs so at the state of Clear one
should not
assume that one has a license to do just whatever one will. You still
have the
remaining dynamics to go so don't use the abilities you have attained
already to
enslave others, or indeed, yourself.
With freedom comes responsibility and with responsibility comes
the need
to assess one's actions and to take only such actions as will do the
greatest
good over the greatest number of dynamics. So, the Policies of
Scientology which
have enabled you to reach the state of Clear still apply to all
Clears. In fact
they apply more because you have the reality of their value and the
necessity of
seeing that they are followed.
Those who have not yet attained Clear will be watching you with
some awe,
so you have the duty of setting an example of exemplary behaviour in
all aspects
of your life. As a Clear you have no privileges beyond being declared
Clear.
As a result, bigger responsibilities will be given and expected
of you so
you must be prepared to responsibly educate yourself where necessary
so that you
can do whatever is assigned to you in a proper manner in keeping with
the main
goals and aims of Scientology.
So for you there is no sitting down and resting upon your
laurels, no
waiving of policy, no promiscuous 2nd Dynamic activities, no improper
assumption
of power, control or influence or assuming that you automatically know
best in
every situation. It is a crime to invalidate the state of Clear-see to
it that
you don't do this in your conduct as a Clear, particularly as regards
yourself.
You still have the rest of the dynamics to go.
You have now become more than ever a part of a team. Obsessive
individualism and a failure to organise were responsible for our
getting into
the state we got into.
As soon as you have gone the rest of the way this will become
abundantly
plain.
I expect and need your help to carry out the broad mission of de-
contaminating this area of the universe. If you wish to help, your
first duty is
to protect the repute of the state of Clear by exemplary conduct. Your
second
duty is to attain OT as soon as possible. Your third, if you still
wish to help,
is to become part of the endeavour to clean up this sector of the
universe and
make it safe not only for ourselves but the billions of others who
have been
harmed.
As a Clear you are welcomed and honoured. Don't do anything that
will wear
out your welcome or bring dishonour on yourself or upon other Clears.
Thank you for what you have done so far.
Thank you for what you will do in the future.
I know I can count on you.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.cden
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
484
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 APRIL 1967
All Adv Cse Students
Registrars all Orgs
SECTION III OT PREREQUISITE
It is required that by the time of completion of Section II OT
Course or
before Section III OT Course the student must have completed the Saint
Hill
Special Briefing Course.
The reason for this is that the skill and general command of
Scientology
required to get through Section III is well in advance of lower grade
demands
upon the student. He or she must be a thoroughly good auditor to be
able to
handle Section III.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jp.rd Founder
Copyright ($) 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 APRIL 1967
Saint Hill
Only
STAFF ON SAINT HILL ADVANCED COURSES
HCO Policy Letter of 13 December 1965, "Staff on Saint Hill
Clearing
Course", which states that "at least 5 hours of auditing must be done
a week by
the Saint Hill staff on the Clearing Course" is hereby cancelled as an
arbitrary.
Students who have ceased to audit on the OT Course are in
trouble case-
wise and shall be sent to Review.
Executive Council WW
Mary Sue Hubbard
The Guardian WW
for
LRH:jpsd 1967 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
485
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 MAY 1967
Limited Non-Remimeo
SH Staff
WW Staff
Advanced Courses
Students ADVANCED COURSES ADMINISTRATION
Advanced Courses, including the Clearing Course and OT Course,
are under
the regulation of the Executive Council WW, just as any other WW
activity. They
remain in the Office of LRH WW.
ISSUE OF MATERIALS
Only course materials and matters of regulation of Course or
students may
be mailed out by the Course. All other matters proceed on Org channels
and are
forwarded to LRH on channels for approval. In being forwarded to LRH,
they may
be stopped or handled at any point upward.
Executive Council WW
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:jp.bh The Guardian WW
Copyright ($) 1967 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 JULY 1967
Limited Non-Remimeo
SH Staff
WW Staff
ADVANCED COURSES SUPERVISORS' STATISTIC
In accordance with an order of the Founder that the Advanced
Courses'
statistic is Number of Hours Audited by Students, the following
policies shall
apply to the Advanced Courses.
Each ADVANCED COURSES Supervisor is now allotted his own
Clearing or OT
Course students whose auditing he/she supervises.
Students on the OT Course are divided equally between the OT
Course
Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor/s.
Students on the Clearing Course are divided equally between the
Clearing
Course Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor/s.
When new Assistant Supervisors are added, re-adjustment is to be
made so
that the new Supervisor has his own students.
The Statistic for each Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor shall
be the
"Number of Hours Audited" by his/her students.
The main Advanced Courses' overall Statistic, and therefore the
Statistic
of Chief Supervisor of Advanced Courses, is total number of hours
audited by all
students.
Executive Council WW: Fred
Hare
Joan
McNocher
LRH:jp.bh Mary Sue
Hubbard
Copyright ($) 1967 The Guardian
WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for L. RON
HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
486
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1967
(Replaces HCO Pol Ltr of 30 Sept 1966 and
combines it with HCO Pol Ltr of 28 Sept 1966)
Sthil Only
WW & SH Execs
Ethics
Cl Cse Personnel
ClCse Students
OTCseStudents
CLEARING AND O.T. COURSE REGULATIONS
CLEARING AND O.T. COURSE SUPERVISION
The answers to all contingencies are contained in the Clearing
Course
materials. Therefore the following regulations apply:-
1. No off-line advice may be sought in cases of students on the
Clearing or
O.T. Course.
2. All problems arising with cases, if the case does not resolve,
must be
reported to ES Comm Qual WW who may then only order check-outs
on the
Clearing and O.T. Course Supervisors.
3. Any "unusual solution" sought must be answered only by check-
outs of the
Supervisors of the Clearing and O.T. Courses.
4. Check-out of states of case by Qua! must be done by a Clear
member of Qua!
staff and the student's complete folder must be submitted to
such an
examiner at the time of examination for his inspection.
5. Any person examining in Qual for attained states of case must
have been
checked out On all technical materials of the Clearing and O.T.
Courses
and especially any remedies.
6. Any examiner checking out states of case in Qual must be Clear.
7. All Clearing and O.T. Course personnel must be Clear to be
Clearing Course
personnel or to help on the Clearing or O.T. Course.
8. No person may be admitted on the Clearing Course who has a bad
Ethics
history or a this lifetime suppressive order or a criminal
record without
a special Board of Investigation convened by the Exec Council
WW.
9. No person with a record of using Clearing Course materials
suppressively
may be admitted on the O.T. Course.
10. Persons who have been careless or insecure in their handling of
Clearing
Course materials or who have made them available to another may
not be
admitted on the O.T. Course regardless of action taken at the
time or
Clearing Course restoration.
11. All Clearing Course Auditors and O.T. Course Auditors who have
materials
to be exchanged bring their folders tO .Reception 9.30 a.m. Non-
staff
members will have folders returned at 2.30 p.m. in Reception.
Staff
members folders will be brought to them during the day.
12. When a Clearing Course or O.T. Course Student wishes to
communicate in any
way with the Supervisors, he must do this through Reception,
either by
sending his folder or by a letter.
487
13. If a student needs any advice he must always send his folder to
the Course
Supervisors. If in emergency, a cable may be sent also.
14. No alcohol may be consumed within 24 hours before a session.
15. Auditing must be done every day.
16. Clearing Course and O.T. Course students are not to discuss
Clearing or
the O.T. Course or their case with ANYONE except with the
Clearing or O.T.
Course Supervisors and then only through their folders or by
written
report, unless they are called in specifically by the
Supervisors.
When a student is in Review he may discuss his case with a
properly
assigned Review Auditor only.
17. Students who have ceased to audit on the Clearing Course or O.T.
Course
are in trouble case-wise and shall be sent to Review.
Violations of these regulations must result in a Committee of
Evidence.
LRH:lb-r.jp.rd L. RON
HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1966, 1967 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Note: This revision changed Ad Council to Exec Council and
substituted No. 17
above for the 5 hour per week rule. It was later cancelled by HCO P/ L
9 January
1968, page 491, and then revised and reissued as HCO P/L 12 August
1971 Issue
III, Advanced Courses Regulations-Advanced Courses Supervision, in the
1971 Year
Book.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 NOVEMBER 1967
WW & SF1 Execs
Ethics
Advanced Courses Personnel
CC Students
OTC Students
CLEARING AND OT COURSE REGULATIONS
(Continues HCO Po1 Ltr of 30 Sept 1966 of same name)
18. Clearing and UT Course students' worksheets and auditor reports
must be
legible; otherwise it will be considered a No Report.
19. Clearing Course students are expected to remain on location
until given
permission to go home in writing by their Clearing Course
Supervisor.
Ch. Super Adv Courses : Janet
Guilford
Qual Sec SH : Helen
Pollen
HCO Area Sec WW : Len
Regenass
Exec Council WW : Tony
Dunleavy
Eunice
Ford
LRH Comm WW : Ken
Delderfield
D/Guardian WW : Joan
McNocher
Mary Sue Hubbard
LRH:jp.cden The Guardian WW
Copyright ($) 1967 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
488
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 NOVEMBER 1967
Remimeo
HCO Div I
Dir I & R
Ethics
HCO Area Sec
Advanced Courses Hats
Security Checker Hat
ADDITIONAL POLICIES ON ADVANCED COURSES SECURITY
Mixed Practices and Clearing Course Security
Any applicant for Advanced Courses (Solo Audit Course, Clearing
Course or
OT Course) discovered or known to have any current record of mixed
practices may
not be accepted on such until he has had a thorough Review in Qua!
with the
matter handled and passed a probationary period of at least three
months.
The PURPOSE OF THIS POLICY is to ensure that it be ascertained
beyond any
shadow of a doubt that the person has truly left former practices,
because a
'mixed Practice Case' is a risk to Advanced Course Security.
ADDITIONAL POLICIES ON ETHICS CLEARANCE FOR CLEARING COURSE
When passing on Ethics Clearance for the Clearing Course, the
Ethics
Officer must examine the Applicant's Central File Folder and Org
Personnel File
in addition to his Ethics File.
SUMMARY OF ETHICS RECORD
The Ethics Officer WW is to check the Advanced Scheduling Book
on the 1st
of every month for anyone who intends enrolling on an Advanced Course
the
following month (i.e., on the first of January the book is checked for
applicants in February). When such a name is found, the Ethics Officer
WW is to
contact Airmail the Continental Org concerned for a summary of the
person's
Ethics Record. The Ethics Officer of the Continental Org concerned
fills in the following form:
SUMMARY OF ETHICS RECORD
TO: ETHICS OFFICER WW
FROM: ETHICS SECTION ______________
APPLICANT'S NAME: ____________________________
LOCAL ADDRESS: ___________________________________
1. Was the applicant ever ORG STAFF _________ PRECLEAR _________
STUDENT _______
2. Number of chits in Ethics File ________________-
3. Number of Ethics Orders issued on the Applicant
4. Nature of Ethics Orders
____________________________________________________
489
Has the Applicant ever been:
5. Subject of an SP Order Yes ______ No ______
6. Subject of a Non-Enturbulation Order Yes ______ No -
7. Subject of a Type III Ethics Order Yes ______ No ______
8. Dead Filed Yes _____ No
9. Guilty of writing Entheta comms to the Org Yes ______ No _____
10. Guilty of a Criminal Record Yes _____ No _____
11. Guilty of Breach of Security Yes _____ No _____
12. Guilty of a bad Ethics Record Yes _____ No _____
IF THE ANSWERS TO ANY OF THESE POINTS S to 12 is 'Yes' then the
Ethics
Folders and other supporting data or documents must be forwarded at
once by
Airmail to the Ethics Officer WW. In carrying this out the Ethics
Officer must
make reference to all files in the Continental Area of the Applicant.
This form can only be filled out by an Ethics Officer properly
appointed
by the Office of LRH WW.
Attested
_________________________
________ Ethics
Officer
Location
______________________
Date
________________________
--------------------------
DEADFILING
ANY record of the applicant being deadfiled must be considered a
bad
Ethics Record and a special Board of Investigation must be called for
by the
Ethics Officer WW per HCO Policy Letter of Sept 30, 1966, "Clearing
and OT
Course Regulations". In such a case, all the files of the person must
be called
for, including the C/F Folder from any Outer Org as well as any Ethics
Files so
that the Board of Investigation has these folders at hand in its
investigation.
ONLY DULY APPOINTED ETHICS OFFICERS
Only a properly appointed Ethics Officer (authorized by the
Office of LRH
WW) who has checked out on all of the Ethics Officer checksheet, which
must
include pertinent policies on Advanced Courses Security, may give
final Ethics
clearance for entry onto an Advanced Course (Solo Audit Course,
Clearing Course
and UT Course).
Written by a Board of
Investigation
CHAIRMAN : Monica Quirino
SECRETARY : Dalene Regenass
MEMBER : David Ziff
LRHjp rd for Mary Sue Hubbard
Copyright ($) 1967 The Guardian WW
by L. Ron Hubbard for L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
[Note: HCO Policy Letter of 21 November 1967, Additional Policies on
Advanced Courses Security, is cancelled. - LRH. HCO P/L 28 January 1968.]
[This Policy Letter was later revised and reissued as HCO P/L 12
August 1971 Issue II, same title as above, in the 1971 Year Book.]
490
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 JANUARY 1968
Remimeo
CANCELLATION OF HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPT 1967
AND HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 SEPT 1967
HCO Policy Letter 13 September 1967, "Clear Check Outs" and HCO
Policy
Letter of 12 September 1967, "Clearing and 0. T. Course Regulations,
Clearing
and 0. T. Course Supervision", are hereby cancelled as both policies
contain
inspection before the fact and therefore violate the Fast Flow System
of
Management.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd
Copyright ($) 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 DECEMBER 1969
Class VIII
Level VI SHSBC
R6EW Solo Course
SOLO AUDITING AND PREGNANCY
Solo Auditing from the Clearing Course upwards is not
permissible for
pregnant women.
One may proceed with solo auditing after the baby is born.
Quentin Hubbard
Class VIII
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:QH:ldm.rd
Copyright ($) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
491
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
AOs HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 AUGUST 1971
SHs Issue V
Tech Hats
Qual Hats (Replaces HCO P/L of 10 Nov 66)
Ethics
R6EW, CC &
OT Course Packs ADVANCED COURSES MATERIALS
SECURITY OF DATA
Issued with a small amount of R6 data in 1964, three or four
persons
promptly used it on pcs knowing well it was forbidden. The pcs became
ill or
misemotional toward us. And just the day I write this (original
writing 4
October 1965) I myself encountered a pc, very ill, who had had some
original R6
data misused on her and did not suspect why her case and health had
worsened.
She was not ready for it at all.
The issue earlier was a trial balloon, in a sense. I found
certain persons
(a small minority) were not up to responsibility for the material of
April 1964.
Therefore our firm action will be that the moment we find the
material of
the Clearing Course or OT Course has escaped or been misused we will
quickly
trace the person who was insecure and cut off all further or any
future Clearing
or OT data issue to that person. The likelihood of independent
discovery even
with clues has proven to be non-existent by actual review of auditors
trying to
find pieces of it when they had over half of the answers already.
You must realize that we suffer, all of us, from the misuse of
knowledge
concerning the mind at a very early period. To place this data near
such people
as psychiatrists or even states places them in a. position to enslave
people or
repeat the original action and cave people in. A very small minority,
receiving
incorrect data did promptly use it harmfully on others after April
1964.
Until we ourselves have climbed well out of the hole, we must
safeguard
the materials. Our case gains depend on it. And others could make our
salvage of
people impossible.
We do not safeguard these materials from any commercial
consideration. Our
futures, those of each of us and those of all Scientologists, depend
on our
keeping this material under lock and safeguarded from abuse until we
are well
away as a group and can handle things better as individuals as well as
a group.
The road is wide open to anyone to come up the grades and obtain
them. But
it is shut to any who misuse them or injure their security.
Students of the Advanced Courses, the Advanced Course C/S and
Supervisor,
Ethics Officers and all HCO and Org staff have it in their personal
interest to
enforce security of materials to the limit.
These restrictions apply to no data up to Grade V.
From Power Processing on up the data is confidential. Up to
there, you can
release Scientology data as you always have-freely and to everyone.
But this
last bit is dangerous in unskilled or uneducated or unscrupulous hands
and it is
purely ours. It belongs to the Scientologists who keep the show on the
road and
must be available to them when they are ready.
Reissued by
Flag Advanced Courses
Supervisor
for
LRH:BW:LR:sb.rd Training and Services
Aide
Copyright ($) 1971 for
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
492
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 28 OCTOBER 1968
Issue II
Remimeo
Class VIII Course
CLASSIFIED MATERIALS
Class VIII students are taught the following classified
materials:
Power Processes.
Section IV OT.
Class VIII graduates can NOT NOT NOT offer these to the public
or sell them to the public.
Class VIII students are only taught these as they often have to
REPAIR
them, and to repair them, they must know all about them.
This, however, does not give them the authorization to do them
on anyone,
nor to offer them for sale, nor to give this processing to others.
Saint Hill
and the American Saint Hill Organization are the only authorized
places where
the Power Processes can be run and the Sea Org Advanced Organizations
are the
only authorized places where Section IV OT may be run.
LRH:ew.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 SEPTEMBER 1969
Issue II
Remimeo
BPI SUCCESSFUL CLASS VIIIs
Any Class VIII auditor may have the new Standard Dianetics
Course free of
charge at his nearest org or an AO.
The additional certificate of HDG is required of Class VIIIs so
they can
handle Case Supervision and Standard Dianetic Auditing as well as
audit well in
Standard Dianetics.
The certificate of HDG is a prerequisite (along with a Class VI)
for all
new AO Class VIII enrollees after the date of receipt of this Policy
Letter.
STANDARD DIANETICS
The Course is. available at AOs and SHes.
It has been found that the ability to audit Standard Dianetics
well in its
simplicity speeds Academy, VI and VIII training greatly and reduces
failed
students in the Academy, VI and VIII Courses to zero.
It is not the intention of this Po1 Ltr to interrupt the plans
or
activities of Scientology Classed Auditors or applicants and all
possible
adjustment will be made in orgs to accommodate Scientology Classed
Auditors to
quickly obtain their HDG during this period of adjustment.
We now have a smooth flowing tech training line and have found
there are
no failed cases where training is good and which follows this
gradient.
LRH:ldm.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
493
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 OCTOBER 1969
Remimeo
CLASS VIII & HDG
(Modifies Earlier Requirements)
No Class VIII Auditor may have his final certificate until he
has also
acquired his HDG.
All Class VIII enrollees are required to have an HDG before
being admitted
to the Class VIII Course.
Requirements for course enrollments are
HDC required for HDG Course.
HDG required for Class 0-I-II-III-IV.
HPA-HCA required for Class VI Course.
HDG and Class VI required for Class VII.
HDG-Class VI required for Class VIII.
LRH:nt.ei.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1969 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 17 November 1969, Dianetics and Scientology
Services, page 401.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 JANUARY 1970
Remimeo
Registrar
Qua1 Secs
Tech Secs
CLASS VIII REQUIREMENT
The requirements for enrolment on the Class VIII Course are HDG,
Class VI
and enrolment and successful progress on OT III. It is not a
requirement that
one has to have completed UT III but his III Solo Auditing must be
successfully
in progress before beginning Class VIII studies.
Lt. Nate Jessup
CS-4
LRH:NJ:jz.ei.rd for
Copyright ($) 1970 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
494
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
LONDON
Extracted from CLINICAL PROCEDURE OF 20 MAY 1954
ATMOSPHERE OF THE CLINIC
The atmosphere is a most important part. It should be business-
like and
friendly. By no means should any person be allowed on the premises who
does not
have business there. There is nothing so disturbing to a preclear as
to have a
bunch of auditor's hanging around discussing techniques and their own
cases or
seeking to recruit clinic preclears.
THE AUDITORS OF THE CLINIC
The auditors of the clinic should have their own bulletin and
schedule
board, but this is not to be in the reception room.
Auditors must not congregate in the reception room and should
not talk to
preclears except in session.
[Unsigned}
Issued by HCO London
in Digest I re-issue
of
18 March 1958.
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT
GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
20 Buckingham Street, Strand, London W.C.2
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1956
ORGANIZATIONAL BULLETIN
REGISTRAR
The Registrar has responsibility for procurement, interview,
signing up,
legal and finance. The Registrar is directly responsible for all
students and pc
procurement and keeping place full.
The Registrar is not responsible for auditing rooms, auditors,
assignment
of pcs to auditors or states of cases. These are the function of the
Director of
Processing.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ebh.rd
495
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
20 Buckingham Street, Strand; London W.C.2, Gt. Britain
ORGANISATIONAL BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1956
PROCEDURE FOR PUTTING AUDITORS ON STAFF
AUTHORITY - DIRECTOR OF PROCESSING.
EMERGENCY - Bring auditor on, put on the pc, assign room, advise
Accountant at
once by slip he has been hired. Do not give him any advice. Brief
later when
finished with case if auditor to be retained.
HIRING AUDITORS ON STAFF - This assumes always that Auditor is an RCA
(HPA) at
least. Hire one to two weeks before needed. Give him incidental
Organisational
duties-correcting tests, mailings, 'phone, anything so he'll have 8c
on
Organisation itself. Have him attend auditors' conferences.
Let him observe staff auditors at work.
Have a set of Briefing lectures on tape for him to listen to
between 3.30
and 4.45 p.m. daily. (Machine with Earphones.) Have him listen to each
about
three times.
Give him High School Indoctrination.
Make him define Staff Auditor.
Have a staff auditor patch him up with a small amount of evening
auditing
on handling preclears.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ebh.rd
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT
GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812 19th Street, N.W., Washington 9, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1956
HGC PRECLEAR COMPLAINTS
On any HGC preclear complaint, we will give more auditing for
cash, and
tear up any old HGC note (requisite: real complaint grounds).
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mek.rd
POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY 1957
c to London
The Hubbard Guidance Center is primarily a service unit.
Priority on Auditors is this:
1. Outside preclears including complaints and extra weeks.
2. Staff in general.
3. Staff Auditor processes Staff Auditor.
Categories 2 and 3 must have the permission of the
Organizational
Secretary before any processing can be done.
Richard F. Steves
Organizational Secretary
496
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
(FOR LONDON AND WASHINGTON)
HCO PROCESSING BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1957
WHAT TO TELL NEW HGC AUDITORS TO
PROCESS ON PRECLEARS
When a new auditor is taken on at HGC we do not
1. Train him while he is processing his first preclear.
2. Tell him what process to run.
3. Add to his already tense confusion of being on staff by
unstabilizing all his stable auditing data, too.
We Do this:
1. We ask him what process he has the greatest certainty on.
2. We tell him to audit the pc with that process and no other.
3. If he has certainty on several we have him select one best
suited to
pc and have him use that.
Then we train up the new staff auditor by auditor's conferences
and HCO
Board of Review at a leisurely pace.
STABLE DATUM:
It will be found that any auditor using a process on which he
has high
reality will obtain high results with a pc using that process.
LRH:md.rd L. RON HUBBARD
6-10-57
THE FOUNDING CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
1812 19th Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
FOUNDING CHURCH POLICY LETTER OF 10 JULY 1957
HIRING OF STAFF AUDITORS
Before a staff auditor may be hired it is necessary that he have
an
interview with me.
LRH:md.rd L. RON HUBBARD
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 SEPTEMBER 1957
When a verbal direction is given to the HGC Staff Auditors
concerning the
processing of preclears, such as what process is to be run, etc, the
auditor is
to write out verbatim the order and have it initialed by myself and
present it
to the Director of Processing immediately. The processing directions
are to be
followed exactly without variation until ordered to change.
This is the Stable Datum: If given an order by myself and it
isn't
written, you are to write it out.
LRH:md.nm L. RON HUBBARD
9-2-57
497
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HASI POLICY LETTER OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1957
All preclears are expected to:
1. Attend the evening PE Course
2. Work the Handbook for Preclears evenings while being
processed at the
HGC,
Effective at once.
L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HASI POLICY LETTER OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1957
To Tech Dir
Assoc Sec
Director of Processing
Registrar
All Auditors
H.G.C. POLICY
RESULTS OR ELSE
----------
On preclears, call them back where they felt no gain occurred.
Clean up all flubbed cases.
LRH:rd L. RON HUBBARD
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT
GREEN ON WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HASI STAFF NOTICE OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1957
Please note that our Clinical activities are dealt with by the
Hubbard
Guidance Centre (see the Organizational Board). Therefore this title
should be
used in reference to that service.
Jack
Parkhouse
498
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HASI POLICY LETTER OF 8 FEBRUARY 1958
(Issued at Washington)
Since people will begin to expect being cleared, all processing
must be
sold on basis of estimate to clear.
Therefore the pkgs are now as follows:
1 week - 50 gns. Pro. 25 gns.
3 weeks - 125 gns. Pro. 75 gns.
5 weeks - * Pro. *
7 weeks - * Pro. *
(* these prices to be issued at a later date).
The conditions monitoring acceptance or establishment of number
of wks are
as follows:
One wk - Would show up top of graph, high on meter, no field,
generally
nul on needle, no psychosomatic or visual difficulty. IQ above 125.
3 wks. - Middle range of graph, IQ above 100. No psychosomatics.
No field.
5 wks. - Middle lower range of graph, IQ above 80.
Psychosomatics or
visual difficulty. Some field.
7 wks. - Lower area of graph. Psychosomatic or visual
difficulties. Black
field. Mental problems.
Unacceptable. Psychotic persons who would require
institutionalization to
be processed.
A person is disqualified from processing by severe medical
illness needing
a doctor's care.
There is. no guarantee of clearing or even case gain.
All state of case is established by Dir of Processing, never by
Registrar.
The above tests are all made by Dir of Pr after pc has been signed up
by
Registrar for something and has been given written tests. Then person
goes to
Dir Pro and is looked over, and accepted or rejected. If rejected on
grounds not
enough processing is bought person is returned to Registrar to buy it.
We do not care what initial hours the Registrar sells.
We do not care when the person receives the processing or even
when he
pays for additional weeks required by Dir Pro. We do care that a
reality on
number of wks bought exists. Otherwise we will be giving away too many
free wks.
The pc must know what to expect.
Change in Release. All papers signed must reflect that
acceptance of the
pc for processing is also contingent on an interview with Dir Pr and
that
signing up with the Registrar does not commit org until also accepted
and signed
up with the Technical Division.
rs.18.2.58/rd LRH
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.l
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MARCH 1958
Addition to HASI Policy Letter of Feb 8, 1958
The following are prices of auditing "packages" to be sold on
the basis of estimate to clear.
1 week - 50 gns. Pro. 25 gns.
3 weeks - 125 gns. Pro. 75 gns.
5 weeks - �200 Pro. 125 gns.
6 weeks - �240 Pro. 150 gns.
7 weeks - �275 Pro. 175 gns.
8 weeks - �300 Pro. 200 gns.
HCO
499
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL COLOUR
FLASH
NOT GREEN ON
WHITE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. HASI, L.A.
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JULY 1958
STAFF CLEARING
The Director of Processing is in charge of Staff Clearing.
LRH:bt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
LONDON
HCO TECHNICAL POLICY LETTER OF 25 NOVEMBER 1958
ACADEMY TRAINING BULLETIN
All Area
Offices
TECHNIQUES TO BE USED ON HGC PRECLEARS
Effective Dec. 1, 1958 in all Area Offices
The following techniques are the only techniques to be used on
HGC
preclears, effective Dec. 1, and continuing. These produce clears in
the hands
of most auditors.
Deviations by Director of Processing or staff auditors are
violations of
the Code of a Scientologist under No. 2 and Auditor's Code under No.
3.
Where needed:
CCH 1
CCH 2
CCH 3
CCH 4.
On all other Pcs:
1. Rudiments (not CCH 0) Establish: Auditor, pc, room, session
to start.
2. Start-Change-Stop on a person or object.
3. Factual Havingness.
4. What can you confront? (Repetitive Command)
5. You make a mock-up for which you can be wholly responsible.
6. General help; Help on the Rock.
7. Step 6 of Clear Procedure.
Exception: Only where staff auditor has been trained in an ACC
given to
running engrams only (1st such ACC was 5th London October-November
1958) may the
staff auditor run engrams or use CCH 0. Early Dianetic auditors are
not, repeat
not, included in this exception. It is a matter of judgment here that
in event
of question about engram running the auditors not specially trained in
1958 or
later to do so will make more clears by the above than by "running
engrams". The
running of engrams by Scientology, rather than Dianetics, is splendid
and speeds
clearing but only where specially trained. There is too much new data
about it
for assimilation short of an engram running ACC. 20th ACC graduates
are not
qualified to run engrams.
L. RON HUBBARD
500
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 DECEMBER 1958
HCO SEC'L LETTER OF 23 DECEMBER 1958
Issued at Washington
To All HCO Personnel
QUALIFICATIONS OF HGC STAFF AUDITORS
Effective 2 April 1959, HCO must pass on all auditors employed
by an HGC
from technical qualification standpoint only.
The following criteria only will be used.
1. Auditor must have a certificate HPA/HCA or above in force and in
good
standing.
2. Auditor's certificate must have been Validated for CCH 0 to 4
and TR 0
to 9.
3. Auditor's OCA/APA profile and IQ must comply with staff
acceptance
requirements. .
4. Auditor must have had run on him at least 50 hours of ARC Break
Straight
Wire plus Factual Havingness (See HCO Bulletin of Dec. 22, 1958)
and the
auditor who did it must furnish a certificate that it has been
done.
HCO BOARD OF REVIEW
The HCO Bd of Review shall keep files relating to any auditor
passed for
HGC employment including miscellaneous data, a profile copy, IQ final
score,
Validation slip, etc.
The HCO Bd of Review may issue a letter on HCO stationery
stating that the
auditor named has been passed for employment on staff at the HGC of
any central
organization. The letter should be sent to LRH for signature after
being
counter-signed by the Area HCO Bd of Review. A copy must be kept in
the
auditor's files.
The HCO Bd of Review should encourage the D of P to have in
field auditors
every Thursday night to teach them the routines and activities of an
HGC and to
get them up to HGC qualification level.
After the effective date no auditor not so passed can be used by
a D of P.
Therefore, the program should begin at once and all possible
auditors
should be included.
The HCO Secretary and the HCO Bd of Review of any given area are
responsible for this program.
L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
Convert to HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 JUNE 1959
Sec ED
CORRECTION OF HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 DECEMBER 1958
QUALIFICATION OF HGC STAFF AUDITORS
The following criteria only will be used:
4. Auditor must have had run on him at least 50 hours of
"From where could you communicate"
and the auditor who did it must furnish a certificate that it
has been
done. .
LRH:gh.rd L. RON HUBBARD
501
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT
GREEN ON WHITE
HCO SECRETARIAL LETTER
December 31, 1958
ROUTING OF PROFILES
HGC profiles are to be sent at once after viewing by auditor, D
of P and
PC via HCO to L. Ron Hubbard directly, by air mail.
They will be returned to D of P via HCO Area Secretary for her
interest
and any needful interview with D of P to clarify points.
The profile used is to be OCA for sterling area, APA for $
areas. The IQ
grades are to be contained on it. The profile only is to be specially
printed
locally in two forms. One on Airmail weight paper, the other on
regular paper.
When profile is drawn two more copies are made, one on featherweight
for L. Ron
Hubbard and one on regular paper for CF. The original is filed with
case
reports. This means when a profile is made there will be also made two
added
copies. The profile original is drawn first and the copies are made by
use of a
pin piercing through needful points.
The profile is accompanied by a Case Analysis report made by D
of P or
Case Analyst. This is to be printed on featherweight paper. There is
only one
copy of this. It is pinned to the profile copy for L. Ron Hubbard. (A
Case
Analysis form is attached hereto.)
The packet of profiles is accompanied by a D of P report, saying
whatever
he cares to say about week's work. Every case in an HGC is reported on
every
week with a profile for each week to L. Ron Hubbard. The
responsibility for this
action is primarily the Processing Administrator's.
If we do this we can improve processing results in general. We
can also
say with truth that all cases are reviewed by L. Ron Hubbard
personally when
they are processed in an HGC.
This will apply at once to Washington, London and Melbourne and
eventually
Johannesburg, Los Angeles, and New Zealand. Do not wait to get new
report forms
printed to get into action.
L. RON HUBBARD
502
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 AUGUST AD9
[Excerpt]
CenOCon
PROMOTIONAL FUNCTIONS OF THE HGC
The promotion function of the HGC consists of turning out cases
that rave
about their auditors and the HGC. It - is unfortunately true that an
HGC is not
as well attended as it gets results. Indeed a good HGC from a
standpoint of
results is often less well attended than one that really chews Pcs to
ribbons.
This is because of the victim complex in the society. But good or bad-
which is
after all a technical, not promotional question-the results of the HGC
MUST
include enthusiasm on the part of Pcs for their Auditors and the
services
rendered. Handling the private lives .of Pcs is forbidden by the
Auditor's Code
when done directly. But sometimes. this has to be done to get the case
upscale.
The best promotion of an HGC is interest in the Pcs in or out of
session. And
this is furthered by the HGC use of tests. An Auditor must not
evaluate for a
Pc. This does not include the D of P. A good D of P evaluates as
harshly as an
instructor and more or less follows the Instructor's Code. An
overbearing
evaluating D of P always has more Pcs than a meek and mild one. The
sending of
tests to the Pc after he gets home, the hounding him afterwards for
reports on
what and how he is doing, is all a promotional function of the HGC.
There is a
five year standing order that a Pc must be written to three times
after- leaving
the HGC, the first letter one week after he leaves, the second letter
one month
after that, and the third letter three months after that. An HGC that
doesn't
stay in communication with the Pcs never has very many. It's not up to
PrR to
stay in communication with the Pcs who had Intensives even though the
PrR does.
It is up to the D of P to stay in~ communication with these Pcs.
LRH:brb.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Excerpted from HCO P/L 26 August AD9, Promotional Functions of
Various Depts. A
complete copy is in Volume 7, page 135.]
503
NOT HCO
POLICY LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
NOT GREEN
ON WHITE
SECRETARIAL TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Applicable to:
Founding Church - Washington, D.C.
No. 150
3 September 1959
DIRECTOR OF PROCESSING - HAT
The Purpose of the Hubbard Guidance Center is to do more for
people's
health and ability than has ever before been possible and to
give the best
auditing possible. To Help People.
An Outline of the Duties of the Director of Processing
1. He accepts all preclears for processing.
2. He releases all preclears from processing.
3. He interviews all incoming preclears and all outgoing preclears.
4. He interviews all persons interested in processing who have
first seen the
Registrar.
5. He interviews and has interviewed all persons receiving group
processing.
6. He gives Case Analysis interviews.
7. He gives estimates for clear.
8. He gives tests for clear.
9. He maintains his schedule.
10. He is responsible for his part in the proper routing of
preclears.
11. He is responsible for the proper routing and handling of
dispatches.
12. He is responsible for answering all mail properly routed to him.
13. He is responsible for the proper routing of new personnel in his
department and for the proper routing of personnel leaving his
department.
14. He is responsible for knowing and being able to properly
interpret tests
and test results.
15. He is responsible for the proper maintenance of his department.
16. He is responsible for knowing his hat and the hat of each person
in his
department.
17. He hires and dismisses all personnel in his department subject
to the okay
of the Organization Secretary.
18. He is responsible for handling all personnel in his department.
19. He is responsible for getting the people in his department to
get the job
done.
20. He is responsible for training auditors.
21. He attends meetings of the Technical Council and the Advisory
Council.
22. He promotes and sells processing in the HGC.
23. He maintains the Code of a Scientologist.
24. He follows all organizational policies.
504
The Acceptance and Release of all Preclears in the HGC
The Director of Processing accepts all preclears for processing
in the
HGC. His. acceptance of them becomes official once he has placed his
signature
on the Contract for Processing, which Contract is sent to him
immediately after
the preclear has been signed up by the Registrar and the preclear has
completed
all financial arrangements with Accounts. He may never refuse
preclears because
he does not have - enough auditors. The Registrar signs them up and he
handles.
Who Cannot Be Accepted for Processing in-the HGC (Refer to Sec'l ED
153)
It is a long standing policy of the Board of Directors of the
Founding
Church that certain persons are ineligible for processing. These
policies are
our law, not the law of society, as we can legally give spiritual
guidance to
anyone. Our law must be strictly' adhered to.
1. The Director of Processing may not and must not accept any
psychotic
persons for processing.
2. The Director of Processing may not and must not withhold a pupil
from
school for processing without a letter from that school so
authorizing his
absence and stating he is to come to us, not an un-named agency.
3. The Director of Processing may not and must not process in the
HGC any
student with a psychotic or institutional background.
4. The Director of Processing may not and must not process in the
HGC any
person who is chronically ill.
Definitions
1. Insane: Having been pronounced insane by a psychiatrist or being
incapable
of any responsibility for social conduct.
2. Institutionalized: Having been committed to a public or private
institution for the insane.
3. Ill: Being medically diagnosed as suffering from a known, well
defined
physical illness susceptible to medical care and relief.
Rights of the Director of Processing Concerning the Acceptance of
Preclears
Although all incoming preclears are signed up for processing for
the
number of weeks of processing which it is estimated that he -will
clear in, some
preclears for various reasons may not be able to take in a full
package all the
weeks necessary; therefore, the Director of Processing has certain
rights
governing the preclears already registered. They are as follows:
1. He may refuse a preclear on the grounds that the preclear's low
profile or
connections may bring a risk to the HGC.
2. He may refuse to accept a preclear who cannot take enough weeks
of his
estimated time to clear.
3. He may refuse to accept a preclear on the grounds of the non-
payment of
former debts-to the HGC.
4. He may refuse to accept a preclear on the grounds of poor
financial
arrangements, past and present, by the preclear.
In all cases of refusal, he returns the preclear to the Registrar.
The Release of Preclears from Processing
The Director of Processing is responsible for releasing
preclears from
processing. He may refuse to release a preclear from processing-whom
he
considers in further need of processing. In which case he sends the
preclear to
the Registrar and informs the
Registrar of such.
505
The Acceptance of Staff for Processing
Before the Director of Processing can accept any staff member
for
processing, he must have received - a dispatch containing the
permission of the
staff member's Department Head and the Executive Director or the
Organization
Secretary. In the case of a Department Head's receiving processing, he
must have
received a dispatch containing the permission of the Executive
Director or the
Organization Secretary.
On Staff processing, outside preclears in every case always have
priority;
therefore, a staff member may not be processed at any time when by
being
processed it would necessitate the hiring of an extra auditor. A staff
member
may have only twenty-five hours of processing at any one time.
Interviewing
The Director of Processing interviews all incoming preclears,
all outgoing
preclears, all persons interested in processing who have previously
seen the
Registrar, all persons applying for a clear estimate, all persons
applying for a
clear test, and the auditor-preclear Case Analysis.
Policy on the Director of Processing's Interviews
It should be made plain by the Director of Processing to all
persons he
interviews that he is not processing them, but is only asking
questions or
obtaining information.
During all such interviews the Director of Processing should
remember that
he is not an Auditor and as such does not have to maintain the
Auditor's Code;
quite to the contrary, the Director of Processing should never permit
the
preclear to retain any idea which is not correct. It is the job of the
Director
of Processing to evaluate for the preclear with a reality and with
truth.
The approximate length of time for all interviews is about
twenty minutes.
Interviewing Incoming Preclears
The Director of Processing goes over briefly with the person the
preclear's profile and other test scores. He .then obtains information
needed
from the preclear and as contained in the proper interview form for
incoming
preclears.
In the case of a preclear having been processed previously in
the HGC, his
folder in Testing Files is pulled and reviewed by the Director of
Processing
prior to the interview. In the interview,, the Director of Processing
does re-
check the preclear with the interview sheet in order to find out what
has
happened to the preclear since the time of his last processing.
Interviewing Outgoing Preclears
The test results of the American Personality Analysis, the IQ
test, the
Tone Scale Test, and the Aptitude test should be gone over thoroughly
by the
Director of Processing with the preclear. All his questions
concerning these
test results and the tests should be answered. Of main importance is
whether the
preclear knows he has obtained results and whether he is happy with
his
processing. In this interview the Director of Processing uses the
interview form
for outgoing preclears.
Case Analysis Interviews
The purpose of this interview is to check and help improve the
progress of
the preclear. The preclear is interviewed with the Auditor present. It
is
conducted with the preclear on the E-Meter. All points on the Case
Analysis
Report are covered. When this has been done, the preclear is requested
to leave
the room and the Director of Processing gives his instructions to the
Auditor.
Interviewing Persons who Apply for Clear Estimates or Clear
Tests
Many people apply for Clear Estimates and for Clear Checks who
have not
signed up for processing or who have not been processed in the HGC.
The Director
of Processing conducts these, but at the same time tries to interest
the person
in processing at the HGC. It may be that some ARC breaks exist and if
handled,
the person will sign up for processing.
506
Post Group Intensive Interviews
The Director of Processing should interview and have interviewed
all
persons completing group processing after the tests have been given
all of them.
Scheduling
The Director of Processing is responsible for seeing to it that
the
routine Auditing schedule is maintained by the auditors and that
preclears who
have been signed up for auditing by the Registrar-on a different
auditing
schedule get audited on that schedule.
The Director of Processing is also responsible for seeing to it
that all
personnel in his department maintain the organization's routine
working
schedule.
The Director of Processing also schedules Congress group
interviews or any
group intensive. Group processing is always scheduled on the basis of
one hour
of group processing alternating -with a fifteen minute break.
Present Schedule
Monday
8:00 - 9:30 a.m. Clear Estimates.
9:30 - 12:00 Noon Making Auditor preclear room assignments,
Case
Analysis interview Schedule, and giving
instruction
to Auditors continuing on a case.
12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 2:00 p.m. Interviewing incoming preclears.
2:00 - 2:30 p.m. Auditor briefing in general and on new
preclears in
specific.
2:30 - 3:15 p.m. Routine duties.
3:15 - 5:30 p.m. Possible Case Analysis of difficult cases,
otherwise
Routine duties.
Tuesday
9:00 - 10:30 a.m. Routine duties.
10:30 - 12:00 Noon Case Analysis interviews and possible
routine duties.
12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 3:45 p.m. Checking sessions and routine duties.
3:45 - 4:15 p.m. Interviews with auditors or routine duties.
4:15 - 5:30 p.m. Routine duties.
Wednesday
9:00 - 10:30 a.m. Routine duties.
10:30 - 12:00 Noon Case Analysis interviews and routine
duties.
12:00 - Afternoon off.
Thursday and Friday
9:00 - 12:00 Noon Routine duties.
12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 3:45 p.m. Routine duties.
3:45 - 4:15 p.m. Interviews with auditors or routine duties.
4:15 - 5:30 p.m. Routine duties.
Saturday
9:00 - 9:30 a.m. Clear Estimates.
9:30 - 12:00 Noon Interviews with outgoing preclears.
12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 1:30 p.m. Clear Estimates.
1:30 - 5:30 p.m. Interviews with outgoing or incoming
preclears or
routine duties.
507
Tests and Their Interpretation
The Director of Processing should be familiar with all tests
administered
in the Testing Section. In particular he should know how to read and
interpret
them. He should thoroughly read and know the Manuals on the American
Personality
Analysis, the Tone Scale Test, the Aptitude Test, and the IQ test.
In interpreting tests he should be thoroughly familiar with the
Four
Points of Error and How to Read Profiles on APA: Comparing Cur-rent
Week Profile
with Week Before.
Clear Estimates
The Clear Estimate is conducted by the Director of Processing.
There is a
Clear Estimate Form which he uses to help him administer the estimate
for clear.
One section of the estimate involves placing the individual on the E-
Meter, and
the other section involves the use of a block test. The bulletin
covering the
administration of the Clear Estimate should be studied carefully by
the Director
of Processing.
Clear Tests
The entirety of the Clear Test is conducted with the testee on
the E-
Meter. The Director of Processing should study carefully the bulletin
on How to
Test for Clear. A Clear Test Form is used by the Director of
Processing. The
Director of Processing only conducts the E-Meter Clear Test and
forwards all
tests up to the HCO Board of Review. He cannot tell the person he is
Clear. Only
the Executive Director, L. Ron Hubbard, can finally say whether a
person is
Clear.
Maintenance The Office of the Director of Processing
The Director of Processing keeps his own office in a neat,
cleanly
condition and sees that all supplies and equipment are kept in clean
neat
condition. Any repairs or maintenance problems should be brought by
him to the
attention Of the Director of Materiel.
Supplies
The Director of Processing looks over the supply needs of his
department
and originates a purchase request or okays the purchase requests of
people in
his department according to the policies laid down.
Hats
The Director of Processing keeps his own hat up-to-date and sees
that the
personnel in his department keep theirs in the same fashion. He is
responsible
for issuing a proper hat to each of his personnel.
Bodies
The Director of Processing keeps his own person in a neat,
professional
presentable condition and sees that his personnel do likewise.
Personnel
The Director of Processing in hiring auditors must be sure that
all
Auditors hired are above the center line of the graph on the APA and
have an IQ
of 120 or more. And as of April 2, 1959, all Auditors employed must be
passed by
the HCO from a technical qualification standpoint. These
qualifications are
covered in-a Secretarial to the Executive Director Number 26.
In the hiring of personnel for his department the Director of
Processing
uses the Personnel Routing and Check Sheet.
He should keep himself informed of good field Auditors and of
good
students who may be developed into staff auditors on graduation.
508
Dismissal of Auditors
The Director of Processing should dismiss those auditors on
staff who have
been found guilty of direct insubordination, flagrant violation of
organizational policies, or for continued bad results with processing.
He must
follow, however, policies concerning how personnel are dismissed. He
also
handles auditors who leave staff without being dismissed according to
the policy
of technical staff leaving a technical post.
Handling of Auditors
The Director of Processing checks each auditor's skill to audit
via the
intercom system installed - in the organization. Notes should be taken
by him on
certain points where auditors are falling down in auditing procedure.
The Director of Processing also checks daily all auditor reports
and makes
his comments and suggestions to auditors on the reports.
The Director of Processing also gives his instructions to the
auditor
after the Case Analysis interview and notes his instructions on the
Case
Analysis Report form.
Routing
The Director of Processing is responsible for seeing to it that
the
routing procedure of preclears is properly followed.
The Routing of Dispatches and Mail
The Director of Processing sees that communications coming into
his
department and communications leaving his department follow the
policies
established concerning the proper form of dispatches, the proper
handling of
dispatches, and the proper usage to the Comm Center. The Director of
Processing
sees to it that all mail coming into his department and all mail
leaving his
department follow the policies laid down concerning the routing of
mail.
The Routing of New Personnel
The Director of Processing in the hiring of staff auditors makes
sure that
the Personnel Routing and Check Sheet is properly handled.
Personnel Leaving Staff
The -Director of Processing sees that personnel leaving his
Department are
routed to the proper terminals.
Routing of Tests
The Director of- Processing routes the original profiles,
auditor report
sheets and the Case- Analyses to the Executive Director after he has
finished
interviewing outgoing preclears. When the Executive Director is not
present in
the area, the Director of Processing routes the light weight profile,
the light
weight Case Analysis form and any comments he may have of the
processing to the
Executive Director. When the original profiles are returned and all
written
comments by the Executive Director to individual auditors about their
preclears
are received, these are routed by the Director of Processing to Test
Files after
he has reviewed and handled them.
Routing of Preclears
All persons involved with the routing of preclears see to it
that bodies
are properly routed in their department and in agreement with the
routing of
bodies as established by other departments and where bodies pass from
his
department into other departments.
Preclears are routed according to the following procedure:
1. The preclear sees the Registrar for signing up.
2. The preclear goes to the Director of Processing for a clear
estimate.
509
3. The preclear goes to the Registrar for the completion of the
processing
contract on the basis of the clear estimate.
4. The preclear goes to Accounts for the invoicing and payment of
his
account.
5. The preclear goes to the Testing Section for his tests.
6. The preclear sees the HGC for obtaining an appointment with the
Director
of Processing.
7. The preclear sees the Director of Processing for his incoming
interview.
8. The preclear reports to the auditor for his processing.
9. The preclear is released by the auditor at the end of his week
of
processing.
10. The preclear is routed by the auditor to testing.
NOTE: Steps 8, 9 and 10 are repeated from week to week for the number
of weeks
the preclear continues.
11. The preclear sees the HGC Administrator for obtaining an end of
intensive
interview with the Director of Processing.
12. The preclear reports to the Director of Processing for his
interview.
13. The preclear goes to the Registrar for a final interview.
All persons involved in this routing procedure are responsible
for seeing
to it that the preclear has reported to the proper terminal and that
that
terminal has initialed the Body Routing Sheet which the preclear has
been given
by the Registrar. If any terminal has not initialed the Body Routing
Sheet, the
preclear should be returned to that person for getting the Body
Routing Sheet
properly initialed. Only after this has happened can the next terminal
on the
routing procedure handle the preclear.
The Training of Auditors
Training of Auditors on New Material
It is up to the Director of Processing to train Auditors on new
material
issued to the HGC as instructions on the procedure to be used in the
processing
of HGC preclears. Such information is normally issued in HCO
Bulletins. It is
not the job of the Director of Processing to interpret these
Bulletins. It is
his job to see that Auditors are trained in the procedures or
processes. If the
Director of Processing finds that there is needed further information
he should
dispatch the Executive Director to get that information. The main
thing that can
happen wrong in the training of Auditors is for the Auditor or the
Director of
Processing to place a totally wrong interpretation on the usage, the
purpose, or
the clearing of some command or procedure. That is 'the reason he
should
dispatch the Executive Director if further information is needed.
Sometimes training tapes are sent by the Executive Director to
the
Director of Processing. In such instances the tape should be played
many times
for the Auditors. Also the Director of Processing may upon request
play certain
tapes to his Auditors. He must never, however, play a MASTER tape. He
can only
play copies of tapes.
Retraining of Auditors
The Director of Processing must see to the continual retraining
of
Auditors. It is normally the basics of Auditing of which Auditors get
slack in
performing. The Director of Processing should go over with auditors
the basic
fundamentals of Auditing, such as the Auditor's Code, definitions of
Affinity,
Reality, and Communication. Training Sessions should be conducted on
all
Training Drills. Auditors who, in spite of this retraining in the
processing
department, still continue to get bad auditing results should be
suspended until
they have been retrained, at no charge to them, to the satisfaction of
the
Director of Training in the Training Department. If the Auditor is
getting poor
results because of his own case level he should be recommended to
auditing at
staff rates. If he does not avail himself of this auditing, he should
be
suspended from staff until he has obtained auditing. If he gets
audited by an
auditor not on staff, he must have his Auditor send a report of the
processing
to the Director of Processing stating what processing was given and
how many
hours it was given. Until such a report is received by the Director of
Processing, he cannot be placed back on staff.
510
The Assignment of Auditors to Preclears
The Director of Processing should know his Auditors. Some
Auditors cannot
handle certain kinds of people. One, Auditor does not do well with a
teenager;
another does not do well with an elderly woman. Therefore, the
Director of
Processing has to use judgement in the assignment of Auditors to
preclears.
Promotion and Sales
The Director of Processing does his utmost to promote all
activities of
the organization.-: If he sees to it that his department is well run
and that it
gives good effective service to the public, he will greatly assist in
the
promotion of the organization.
He should make certain that all the activities of his department
are
advertised in Ability magazine. He writes advertisements for Ability
magazine
and submits them at least twice a month to the HCO Secretary to the
Executive
Director.
The Director of Processing should submit to the Organization
Secretary
promotional mailing pieces, projects, and other ideas in order to keep
the
inflow of preclears up.
Sales
The Director of Processing sells processing to people; he sells
more
processing to people. He should consider everyone as a potential
preclear of the
HGC.
Reporting
Technical Council Report
The Director of Processing in conjunction with the Director of
Training
are to hold a meeting once a week prior to the Advisory Council
meeting and are
to submit their report to the Advisory Council. The information
usually required
in such a report of the Director of Processing is the following:
1. The number of preclears processed in the previous week.
2. The number of preclears who completed processing in the previous
week.
3. The number of preclears in for the current week.
4. A general statement as to the condition and activities of the
Processing
Department.
Advisory Council
The Director -of Processing attends or sends a representative to
the
Advisory Council once a week when all department heads meet.
Other Reports
The Director of Processing sees to it that any other reports
that may be
required of him are submitted by him to the proper terminals.
Reports to the Executive Director
The Director of Processing submits to the Executive Director the
profiles
and other material including the Case Analyses and the daily auditor
reports to
the Executive Director when he is present, immediately after outgoing
preclears
are interviewed. When the Executive Director is not present, the
Director of
Processing routes the light weight profile and the light weight Case
Analyses
with any comments he has to make to the Executive Director.
L. RON HUBBARD
Executive
Director
[SEAL]
511
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 OCTOBER 1959
CenOCon
STAFF AUDITORS
Staff Auditors may not audit more than twelve consecutive weeks
without
being given a two week assignment to another Org post.
The arrangement of this rotation is up to the Assoc Sec with the
advice of
the D of P.
The assignment of a staff auditor to another post for two weeks
must not
deny his services to the organization. Therefore I would suggest that
some post
be nominated to be held by staff auditors and filled thereafter by
rotation of
auditors through that post.
This scheduling must be worked out according to the spirit of
this
directive, which is that staff auditors should get a two week break
from
auditing every twelve weeks. They should not be pulled back on post
simply
because there are too many pcs. Adequate auditors should be taken on
from
Academy and field sources. Too few staff auditors are being taken on
from
Academies to the end result of overworking existing staff auditors and
-denying
the organizations trained personnel. Therefore part of the sense
behind this
consists of compelling D of Ps to increase their available staff.
LRH:ph.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1959 Executive Director
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
NOT HCO POLICY
LETTER
ORIGINAL
COLOUR FLASH
GREEN
ON GOLD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 OCTOBER 1959
CenOCon
HANDLING STUDENTS' AND AUDITORS' REPORTS
(Cancels all previous directives on this subject)
Directors of Training are not to abbreviate their students'
reports in any
way. They are to send the full reports by surface mail to Ron- at
Saint Hill,
and these will be returned.
Anything startling or dangerous that shows training improvement
or decay
should be briefed by the HCO Area Secretary in the Training Digest, so
that it
can be handled speedily.
All HCO Communicators are required to make sure that the
students' reports
are sent by surface mail and not by airmail. They are further
requested to see
that the students write legibly. If they do not, issue them infraction
theses.
Also see that they use flimsy paper to save bulk. -
All Directors of Processing are to see that their auditors use
airmail
weight paper for their reports. Because of the weight, money is being
wasted on
airmail goods.
LRH:NW:dd.rd HCO Secretary WW
Copyright ($) 1959 for
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
512
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 OCTOBER 1959
D of Ps
WW and HCO Area Secs
HOW TO PREPARE HGC WEEKLY REPORTS FOR REVIEW
HGC reports should be submitted every week by the Director of
Processing
to L. Ron Hubbard, as follows: -
1. PC's graph showing before and after test results, on flimsy
paper.
2. PC's case analysed on flimsy paper.
3. PC's end of intensive report, where applicable, on flimsy
paper.
4. Original copies on flimsy paper of auditor's reports for
every
session.
5. Attach drawings to- auditor-'s report, if PC drew answers to
the
commands of comm process.
6. Director of Processing's comments on PC's case and results.
The above 6 items should be stapled together for each individual
preclear
and be forwarded under cover of a memo from the D of P stating:-
(a) Date of report for week ending______________
(b) Number of PCs in the HGC for the week this report covers,
and their
names.
(c) Which preclears received an intensive.
(d) Which preclears received an assist.
(e) Summary of week's results and any general comments.
Always note which processes were run - on which PC and how many
hours of
processing each PC received.
Please write all reports neatly and legibly at all times.
Staff Research
Auditor WW
for
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dd.cden
Copyright ($) 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
513
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London W.1
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JANUARY 1960
Fran Hldrs (Reissued from St Hill)
HCO Secs
Assn Secs
HCO & Central Org Staff
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR REDUCING OVERTS
This Policy Letter is to be followed in HGCs, Co-Audits, and
with staff
and field auditors and PCs as far as it can be practically applied.
It is a breach of the auditor's code to audit without
establishing two way
communication with the PC. This cannot be established while there are
still
overts and withholds on the part of the PC in present lifetime and
sometimes
from earlier lives. Thus two way communication cannot exist so long as
withholds
and overts are still unreduced.
As PCs are sometimes afraid to disclose their private lives to
auditors
and as the PC will eventually want a wider relief of his overts and
withholds,
insofar as practicable, whenever a PC discloses important overts and
withholds
to the auditor, the auditor should have him write these down and sign
them and
send them to me. The auditor should then flatten these with a
responsibility
process. The PC can then be assured that his data is not privately
retained and
the auditor is then to some degree relieved of the secrecy involved, a
thing
which has caused some auditors discomfort. Any overt the PC considers
to be
involved in voicing these overts or in sending them to me should also
be
flattened as we don't want PCs to wind up with a new overt in their
own
consideration-though factually it's no overt, let me assure you, for
me to know
that somebody else is en route to clear.
In those cases where this is done by correspondence the
following
procedure is to be followed. All carping and critical letters
containing
imagined wrongs - should be answered by all persons responsible for
correspondence as follows: "Write down your -overts and withholds
against
Scientology, its organizations and all connected- personnel and send
them to me
so that I can forward them to HCO WW." When this list is received or
when any
such list is received, the reply to the person writing the list should
be as
follows: "Make restitution where you can. Inform me of the steps
taken. Write
down a long list of what responsibility you could take for these
various overts
and send them to me so they can be forwarded to HCO WW." Mary Sue's
name may be
added in any of the above.
Whenever such lists are received by HCO WW I will endeavour to
acknowledge
the receipt. To assist this a complete address should be put on each
list.
Persons calling in person on HCOs or Central Orgs, with carping
criticism,
should be set at once to the above tasks as outlined.
Do not take action on or report to police any unconfessed crimes
found in
this activity. You will find that police are themselves too bowed down
with
their own overts to be able to handle any part of this.
The full extent of our justice will be to demand that persons
guilty of
severe crimes shall be audited at their own expense until checked out
clear on
them and earlier sources.
HCO Secs are authorised to E-Meter check out any and all such
lists on
staff
514
members or important field auditors and to send the result of such
check outs to
be for the file. Without such HCO check outs my files will be
incomplete.
Any person still withholding after every effort to free him and
discovered
later to have been guilty of serious crimes he has not volunteered may
be dealt
with in any way Assn Secs or HCO Secs may see fit as they have not
availed
themselves of our assistance.
My total use of all such lists and files received by me will be
to keep
them under lock and key and to see that they are eventually completed
in terms
of responsibility and to utilise the data in advising the processing
of
persons.
Should any person aver he has already done this with another
auditor he
may pay the expense of cable query and reply to HCO Sthil for my
verification or
denial or further advice.
We are -going to clear more than you think. So a tight
administrative
procedure is indicated.
I contemplate only one punitive action in any of this and that
is any
action necessary to prevent any such disclosed data from being
employed against
the disclosing person in any way to the profit of any receiving
person,
organization or criminal or political group.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.rf.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 JANUARY 1960
CenOCon
REQUIREMENTS FOR HGC AUDITORS
The 21st ACC in Washington and the special HCA/HCS Course held
in
Washington in July and August of 1959 did not teach the CCHs.
Therefore it is recommended that any auditor who received his
validation
or HCA certificate at one of those courses be checked out on the CCHs
before
being permitted to audit as a staff auditor at any HGC.
Peter Hemery
LRH:Js.cden HCO Secretary WW
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard for
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
515
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 AUGUST 1960
1 copy to
Assn Sec
HCO Sec
Registrar
D of P REGISTRAR LOST LINE
Once again the key line is lost-in some Central Orgs between
Registrar and
D of P. This costs us about �25,000 a year internationally.
The Body Registrar drops the ball. The D of P doesn't locate it
or insist
on. it. Then I get letters from whining pcs or D of Ps start giving
free weeks
of processing.
The line has been going out every three months for years. So
please keep
it in.
Proper sign-up includes this line. Check sheets exist for it.
Pcs not
signed up this way are improperly signed up.
Line: Reg signs up pc fully. Pc is taken to D of P at once (not
next
Monday). D of P checks out pc. Says, "I will not take you unless you
have signed
up for enough weeks to clear you. I don't care whether you pay for
them or take
them ever. But you have to sign for them anyway." He checks out pc
without
graphs or IQs. Only a meter. He says, "Seven weeks to clear." Pc goes
back to
Body Reg. Signs up for seven weeks. Pc doesn't have to take them now
or ever. Pc
doesn't have to pay for them. Then pc is told to come in for testing
and
processing.
This is the line. It has no exceptions.
Failure to hold that procedure in results in horrible flukes.
Reg has no
right to do a technical survey of pc. Only D of P has that right. D of
P can
simply refuse to process pc as a psycho if ~C IS psycho.
NO D OF P MAY ACCEPT A PC FOR PROCESSING IF THIS LINE IS NOT
FOLLOWED.
Why is it only I hold this line in in so many places? Pc signed
up for 121/2
hours can complain of no results and demand free time. And we've got
to give it.
A pc signed up for 7 weeks taking 121/2 hours of it has no choice but
to buy more
of his sign-up time.
You'll clear them now in five weeks if you drill staff on
Regimen One and
run help on motion and good 8c and follow the HCO Bulletins.
You're off to a new start in processing so keep that body-tech
line in!
Help me do it.
Now just to show you I help too, get the Ltr Registrar to go
back through
all contracts signed the past few years for untaken weeks and write
the person
who signed up for them "Ron wants you to come in now and finish
getting cleared
on your processing contract. We need a clear in your area."
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:js.rd
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
516
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1960
DofPs
Assn Secs
HCO Secs
GIVING THE PC FULL HOURS
It has come to attention that pcs are sometimes deprived of a
part of
their full 25 hours in an intensive by including coffee breaks in the
auditing
time.
As this is one of the most fruitful sources of pc
dissatisfaction even
when unexpressed, the practice is forbidden.
If the pc demands a break or if the auditor declares one, the
time so
spent is added to the 25 hours, which is to say, the time is-made up
in actual
auditing in the same day it occurred. Careful count must be kept of a
break
since it must be added to session time and given in actual auditing.
Auditing time is very precious to pcs. Please don't waste it.
HAVINGNESS INJUNCTION
No pc may be run on two-way comm, confront, help or other
process until a
process has been found that remedies his havingness and brings the
tone arm to
clear read.
Overt-withhold on the auditor or other terminal may be
considered a
preliminary process as it assists duplication and therefore
havingness. It is
not, however, to be considered a havingness process for purposes of
running a
case.
Havingness processes meant herein are those of the 1st Saint
Hill ACC issued in contemporary bulletins.
MODEL SESSION
HGCs will hereafter use Model Session form immediately that a
havingness
and a confront process are established for a particular pc. Thereafter
all
sessions- shall be in Model Session form.
The purpose of this is to get the rudiments covered to the end
of
obviating ARC breaks and present time problems, the only two things
which can
stall a case which has once gotten started.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dm.cden
Copyright ($) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
517
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 JANUARY 1961
Central Orgs
D of Ps
A BRIEF OUTLINE OF AN HGC
AS CURRENTLY DONE
D of P - Technical Supervision first. Then general supervision.
HGC Admin - Case Acceptances
Supervises HGC tests
Report Files
Auditor Procurement
Room Procurement
Comm Centre for HGC
Reception for D of P
D of P interviews Pc and. Auditor every 5 hours or thereabouts.
A leading Auditor is made Training Officer to Auditors (and
takes a pc).
The Auditor brings in the complete pc's file at each interview.
These are
otherwise in open files in HGC kept by HGC Admin.
LRH:js.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 MARCH 1961
HCO Secs
Assoc Sees
Ds of P
RESTRICTION ON S.O.P. GOALS PROCEDURE
HCO Bulletin of February 18, 1961, S.O.P. Goals, is not to be
sent at
present to Franchise Auditors or other field auditors. It must not be
republished as notes.
Its distribution is strictly restricted to the persons as shown
on the
original bulletin, i.e. HCO Secs, Assoc Secs, Ds of P, all HGC
Personnel, all
Auditors auditing staff, all 22nd American ACC students, and all 3rd
S.A. ACC
Students.
LRH:js.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
518
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF '20 MARCH 1961
Issue II
CenOCon
D of P
All Staff Auditors
HCO Area Sec Hat Check
thoroughly and often
and on all new auditors
BASIC STAFF AUDITOR'S HAT
(This applies mainly to the relationship of the Staff Auditor
to the pc and the D of P and-- does not modify existing
policies
but bears directly on Case Assessments and SOP Goals. This
hat
is needed to smooth out its use and Admin of SOP Goals on
pcs.)
The staff auditor is directly responsible for the - HGC preclear
assigned
to him, Results, lack of results, ARC breaks, recovering the pc after
"blows",
getting the pc to the D of P for interviews, getting - the pe to the D
of P and
Registrar for after intensive interviews and handling all matters
relating the
pc to the Org during the delivery of auditing are all up to the staff
auditor.
The staff auditor may refuse to accept a pc and may refuse to
release a
pc-from auditing. The staff auditor may also refuse to give a
particular session
if in giving one the Auditor's Code is violated as to the pc's need
for food,
rest or the lateness of the hour.
The staff auditor is to deliver all the hours of auditing
purchased by the
pc. Case Assessments and Goals Assessments are part of the pc's
auditing time
when done by the staff auditor. No time spent on the case by ,the D of
P in
conferences, interviews or assessments are part of the pc's auditing
time.
Any time missed by reason of auditor lateness, unavailability of
rooms,
breaks, travel to see the D of P, etc, must be made up on the pc by
the staff
auditor.
Case Assessment
(See HCO B of Nov 18, 1960 for exact form)
The first action of an auditor with a pc-new to him is to fill
in the Case
Assessment Form. This is done on the pc's auditing time.
If a Case Assessment has already been' done and is part of the
pc's
record, but was not done by the same auditor, it may be checked over
with the pc
by his new auditor. In any event the staff auditor's first action with
a new pc
is Case Assessment, whether done from an existing completed form or on
a new
Case Assessment Form. This does not apply to assists. This does apply
to staff
cases as well as outside pcs.
First Auditing
The first formal auditing that the pc receives is given at once
when the
Case Assessment Form is complete.
ALL sessions given in an HGC except those devoted to Assists,
CCH
sessions or "Coffee shop" auditing (inevitably done casually out of
auditing
rooms by staff on staff or students on friends and students even when
you try to
prevent it) are done in Model Session form (HCO Bulletin of ,March 21,
1961). To
repeat, Assists and CCHs are not done in Model Session form. ALL
Assessments
even are done in Model Session form in an HGC. Assists or CCHs can be
explained
first and the pc should be started in such a way as not to cause ARC
breaks,
but are not Model Session.
A Goals Assessment should now be done in Model Session. This
permits the
auditor two cracks at withholds, PTPs and ARC breaks twice in every
session,
using Model Session HCO B of March 21, 1961, which includes withholds
in end
rudiments as well as beginning rudiments. This makes a smoother
picture than
trying to get off withholds with no ARC and no session properly going.
Further,
even a goals assessment really puts the pc in session in Goals SOP, so
a Model
Session is better all around.
The first formal session, then, is rim by Model Session.
519
The staff auditor takes off ARC breaks, a few withholds and any
PTP and
then, in lieu of a process, does an SOP Goals Assessment.
When the assessment is completed,,-, even down to terminal Pre-
Hav level
and finding the auditing command that falls, the staff auditor takes
the pc to
the D of P and has the assessment checked. The D of P, at this time,
does not
touch rudiments, but only sees that goal falls more than other listed
goals and
that terminal and command fall at least as much as the main goal.
Unless only a few minutes remain of the day's auditing, the
auditor then
takes the pc back to the auditing room and starts the second session.
Second Session
In this session as in all remaining sessions the staff auditor
runs SOP
Goals in Model Session form.
The auditor must allow, always, enough time to end the session
for the
day. He makes a nice judgment on this. Half an hour is often spent on
End
Rudiments. Early in the first intensive, the withholds and ARC breaks
take
precedence in End Rudiments. PTPs, ARC breaks and Withholds take
precedence in
Beginning Rudiments. A session cannot be gotten going with a PTP
unhandled. And
a session cannot be ended with an ARC break in full bloom. However, a
session
can be ended with a PTP unhandled, and this is the most lengthy item
usually
encountered in rudiments.
Thus if only one hour remained in the first day's schedule for
the second
session, the staff auditor would run beginning 'rudiments, then end
rudiments
with no process run in the middle of the Model Session.
Third Session
This session like any other is run in Model Session form.
If the- pc is still falling on the meter when asked about
withholds, even
with sensitivity raised, at least half an hour should- be spent
getting them
off. Even if the needle still falls a bit after that half hour, one
goes on to
run the PT Problem and then the process of SOP Goals, which is run
exactly
according to its bulletin. This process occupies the bulk of the
auditing
period. Then in the last half hour one runs the End Rudiments and of
course has
another crack-at withholds.
Fourth Session
Runs the same as the Third Session.
----------
In a 5-day intensive, the 3rd and 4th sessions probably occurred
on same
day.
Fifth Session
During this auditing day or before the fifth session, the pc is
taken by
the staff auditor to the D of P, who checks the pc out on rudiments.
The D of P finds out what is being run from the pc, and checks
out but
does not run anything on the Rudiments. -
The whole record of the pc including the Case Assessment and SOP
Goals
Assessment Sheets are in a folder along with all session reports. The
folder is
in the hands of the staff auditor before the D of P interview, the
last session
report on top.
The D of P adds any and all advices and comments to the last
session
report.
The staff auditor takes the pc back to the auditing room. The
fifth
session is then begun. If the interview took place after the session
was
started, the Model Session was of course completed before the
interview.
The auditor follows the D of P's advices in the next session
after the
interview. This may be, then, the Fifth Session or the Sixth Session.
A difficulty may now occur in the next session after the
interview. The
pc, because of D of P altitude, may have "transferred" to the D of P,
which is
to say, may now consider the D of P his auditor.
520
Therefore, in the next auditing after this D of P interview,
heavy
attention must be given to No. 3 of the Beginning Rudiments. A new
process
could be used -here in lieu of TR5N to correct this. The process is
"Who should
I be in order to audit you?" or "Who am I?" This, run briefly, takes
off any
"transfer" to the D of P and is a good basic rudiment type process
anyway. A
little of it goes a long way, however.
The SOP Goals terminal (or the D of P's advice) is-run in Model
Session
form.
Subsequent Sessions
In subsequent sessions the case is continued on up the line,
with
reassessments for new level each time the tone arm stops moving well
and for a
new goals assessment, adding to the old list any goals the pc now has
as a
result of auditing.
When the First Terminal is Flat
When the first terminal gets no needle reaction on any part of
the Pre-Hav
scale, it is flat. If needle action is still found, take the level
with heaviest
reaction, put together a command that falls also and go on with the
terminal at
that level. But where this no longer occurs, the first terminal is
said to be
flat. This may take a few or many hours. But the thing is to be sure
it's flat.
Now and now only the auditor is to find the Havingness Process
and the
Confront Process of the pc in accordance with earlier bulletins. He
then runs
these enough to stabilize them. He now does his next complete Goals
Assessment.
The auditor now uses the Havingness and Confront processes along
with his
new Goals, Terminal. This is like old Regimen 3 except that the Goals
Terminal
and Pre-Hav Scale are used instead of help. The bulk of auditing is
spent, of
course, on the Pre-Hav Terminal on the Pre-Hav Scale in accordance
with SOP
Goals.
The Third D of P check-out occurs when the Havingness, Confront
and new
Goals Terminal are all found. The D of P checks each one of these and,
briefly,
the Rudiments. The D of P does not run any of these.
When this is done, the staff auditor goes back to the auditing
room and
starts his next session, remembering to again give attention - to the
"transfer"
possibility and to again use at level 3 of the Beginning Rudiments
"Who should I
be in order to audit you?" or "Who am I?"
The Intensive or new intensives continue. The D of P must check
out
rudiments at least every 10 hours of auditing time, and, until toward
the end
of the pc's clearing, must check all new goals and terminals.
The D of P is not permitted to do goals assessments except for
demonstration or when the staff auditor completely fails. The D of P
is not
permitted to audit rudiments for the staff auditor, only to check
them.
Pcs Priorly Audited
Pcs who have been audited before in the HGC but not by the
present staff
auditor are handled much in the same way as a new pc.
The whole record and all auditor reports are taken into the
auditing room.
The staff auditor looks for the Case Assessment. If he or she doesn't
find one,
a new one is made. If the Case Assessment is present, the staff
auditor reads it
all off, verifying each point with the pc.
This done, the staff auditor checks in the reports for any
terminals that
were run on the pc or any Goals SOP run or goals assessments done
before.
Only if a goals assessment has been done does he pay much
attention to the
records. If one has been done (but never run) the staff auditor checks
it over
with the meter. He or she accepts it or rejects it and uses his or her
own
assessment. If it was ever run, the staff auditor cannot reject it but
must
carry on.
If any Goals SOP has been run, the terminal that has been run is
thoroughly meter checked on the Pre-Hav Scale. Any-reactions found are
flattened
as per SOP Goals, in Model Session form. In short, the staff auditor,
locating
unflatness on the terminal first
521
found by some other for SOP Goals running, starts his Model Session,
does the
rudiments thoroughly and' then assesses the first terminal ever run on
the Pre-
Hav Scale again (as he did before he started session), finds the level
accurately, gets a command that will work and carries on.
The new auditor on the old case checks out and flattens on the
whole Pre-
Hav Scale, as indicated by meter reaction for any level, every Goals
Terminal
ever found by any other auditor before he does his own goals
assessment.
If the staff auditor finds a Havingness and Confront process
already
listed as found in the records he or she may use it or find new ones
as best
judgment seems to indicate on inspection.
If help terminals or Dynamic Assessment terminals are listed as
run in the
days before Pre-Hav, they can be neglected.
Clearing
When all terminals seem flat and the assessments find terminals
only to
"blow" almost at once, the pc is near-Clear. SOP Goals is carried
right on until
no assessments register on the meter, but the meter remains free.
Old Help and Dynamic terminals from the pc's file or memory are
now
checked out and run like Goals terminals.
When all this is done, the pc is Clear.
Things That Prevent Clearing
If the pc is run with a FTP in full bloom, or if a goal is
really a long
time PTP and is not audited, the pc will not change toward Clear.
Remedy: Reduce
any PTP that produces needle reaction during Beginning Rudiments. Run
as the
first goal the one which assesses best on the meter, whether you agree
with it
or not-if in doubt choose by meter the goal which is the reason the pc
is being
audited according to the pc.
If the pc has heavy ARC breaks registering he will not only not
progress,
he may worsen the graph. Reduce all ARC breaks found by meter falls in
the
Beginning and End Rudiments of the Model Session.
If the pc has heavy withholds' which register on the meter and
yet the pc
will not give them, the case will not progress.
If a terminal being run on Goals is left unflat (if it registers
on the
needle for any part of the Pre-Hav Scale and that is not flattened)
the next
terminal addressed will not run well and pc will not clear. Check over
every
level of Pre-Hav by needle reaction and flatten any residue, before
you go on to
assessing another terminal.
Overts or overt thinking on Scientology Orgs or personnel can
prevent
Clearing.
Always follow the Auditor's Code.
Pc Blows
A pc is most likely to blow (leave) if withholds are not given
good
attention and pulled. If withholds still register, and pc after
several hours of
auditing still won't give, run a Joburg Security Check on the pc as
part of
Model Session Rudiments 4.
A pc will blow if ARC breaks are not repaired properly when they
happen.
An ARC break can be repaired at any time in the session by TR5N. Only
repair ARC
breaks that fall on the meter.
A FTP unhandled can cause a no-gain and therefore an eventual
blow.
If the pc blows, his or her staff auditor alone is responsible
for getting
him or her back into session. If all else fails 'the D of P can help.
It's a
black mark for a staff auditor if a pc blows.
The whole prevention of blowing is contained in this section if
we add
that the staff auditor's air of competence and facile command of his
tools are
sufficient to inspire pc confidence.
Auditing Maxims
Follow the Code. Particularly Clauses 1 and 2.
522
Get an answer for every question asked before asking another
question.
Ask a question or give a command for every answer you expect.
Don't expect
two answers for one auditor question or command.
Assess and run only what the pc says and the meter says. Don't
write
script and try to audit your own troubles out of the pc or avoid the
pc's
troubles because you have an aversion for them.
Follow the Model Session Script and the TRs exactly. These are
the badges
of a skilled auditor.
The clearer you get the better you will audit. But case is no
excuse for
bad auditing.
Always be real. Don't have big withholds on the pc. Tell the pc
the truth
without violating 1 and 2 of the Code. If you are tired, carry on but
say so. If
the pc wants to see the meter read show it to the pc briefly. Only
cover a meter
during an assessment as pc will start pushing at it. Tell the pc what
he wants
to know about the meter reads.
Don't try to educate the pc on Scientology while you're auditing
him or
her. Tell the pc to be sure to take a PE if they haven't.
Newcomers
Getting a pc started who has never been given any data on
Scientology is
simple now. Just do the sessions of Goals SOP as given above. They
respond to
Case Assessment and Goals Assessments with total interest.
A pc is in session when he or she is interested in own case and
willing to
talk to the auditor.
Cases Not On SOP Goals
About 3 out of 22 cases cannot be started with SOP Goals.
The test is only this: Does the needle move enough, even on high
sensitivity, to do a goals assessment? If it can, do one.
If totally stuck run the concentrate-shift attention process in
regular
Model Session in lieu of Goals Assessment until the Tone Arm is moving
well, at
least 3 tone arm dial divisions per half hour. This process, coupled
with heavy
rudiments, will start most cases so that they can then be assessed.
If the case is incapable of answering sensibly various
questions, run the
CCHs. By answering sensibly is meant "an intelligible response dealing
at least
vaguely with the question".
CCHs are not run in Model Session.
Stopping Processes
Processes are run as long as they produce Tone Arm change.
Processes which
do not produce Tone Arm change are then stopped. If a process doesn't
produce a
Tone Arm change in a half an hour, it must be stopped. Processes which
freeze a
needle and do not free it must be stopped.
A process is never stopped on the recommendation of the pc or
because of
the pc's objections. Such objections in SOP Goals always precede huge
gains on
the process. A process is stopped only when it no longer-produces
meter change.
A process that produces change must be flattened.
The process that turns on a bizarre or unwanted condition will
always turn
it off. If in doubt, flatten the process.
Don't "Q and A". That is where the change in the pc causes the
auditor to
stop or change the process. If the pc changes, continue the process.
If the pc
isn't changing, change the process.
Stop processes and sessions on the auditor's determination,
never the
pc's. The auditor's determination is established by meter reaction,
never pc
reaction. If the meter doesn't act, change the process or end the
session
according to session time. If the meter is acting, don't change the
process and
don't stop the session unless time is up.
523
Before Giving Up
Before chucking in your hand on a trying and unchanging pc and
leaving it
up to the D of P or the Org, do the following:
1. Thoroughly check rudiments with high sensitivity and get them flat
on the
needle with the Mode' Session Rudiments Processes.
2. Run a Johannesburg Security Check on the pc and clear every drop
of the
needle fully.
3. Run Formula 16.
4. Run Formula 13.
5. Run Formula 15.
6. Run "Concentrate-shift attention" process from SOP Goals until
Tone Arm is
very active.
7. Keep rudiments cleared while doing the above.
If you do all these and still get no action, see the D of P. Of
course,
it's impossible to do all the above well on a case and not get it
going
providing only that you do do them well with good TRs.
End of Intensives
At the end of the intensive be sure, if the pc is continuing,
that all is
in order with the Registrar and D of P before you continue on into the
next
intensive.
At the end of all the intensives the pc has bought, be sure the
pc sees
the D of P and the Registrar before the pc leaves the Org.
These actions are wholly up to the staff auditor.
A Completed PC
Be sure, when all the intensives given are over, that the pc's
complete
record, with all its papers, assessments and session reports are
turned in, in a
folder, to HGC Admin for filing. You may add to this file your own
summary and
recommendation on the case if you wish so the next auditor who gets it
will be
assisted.
Additional Staff Auditor Duties
Other staff auditor duties are assigned by the D of P only. No
other
executive may issue direct orders to a staff auditor about his duties
or cases.
Reports
All staff auditor reports go to the D of P. Copies go to myself
at HCO WW
via the HCO Area and HCO WW Technical Secretary.
Nothing gets as much attention from me as the results, graphs,
reports and
comments of the staff auditor.
The whole future stability of the Org rests on the technical
skill of the
staff auditor.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jl.rd
Copyright ($) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[See also HCO P/L 26 May 1961, Basic Staff Auditor's Hat, page 536.]
524