No matching fragments found in this document.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 FEBRUARY 1967
Org Exec Course
ADMIN KNOW-HOW
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEADERS
A few comments on POWER, being or working close to or under a Power,
which is to say a leader or one who exerts wide primary influence on the
affairs of men.
I have written it this way, using two actual people to give an example
of magnitude enough to interest and to furnish some pleasant reading. And I
used a military sphere so it could be seen clearly without restimulation of
admin problems.
The book referenced is a fantastically able book by the way.
THE MISTAKES OF SIMON BOLIVAR
AND MANUELA SAENZ
Reference: The Book Entitled:
The Four Seasons of Manuela by
Victor W. von Hagen, a biography.
A MayflowerDell Paperback, 0ctl966. 6/-
Simon Bolivar was the Liberator of South America from the yoke of Spain.
Manuela Saenz was the Liberatress and Consort.
Their acts and fates are well recorded in this moving biography.
But aside from any purely dramatic value the book lays bare and
motivates various actions of great interest to those who lead, who support
or are near leaders.
Simon Bolivar was a very strong character. He was one of the richest men
in South America. He had real personal ability given to only a handful on
the planet. He was a military commander without peer in history. Why he
would fail and die an exile to be later deified is thus of great interest.
What mistakes did he make?
Manuela Saenz was a brilliant, beautiful and able woman. She was loyal,
devoted, quite comparable to Bolivar, far above the cut of average
humanoids. Why then did she live a vilified outcast, receive such violent
social rejection and die of poverty and remain unknown to history. What
mistakes did she make?
BOLIVAR'S ERRORS
The freeing of things is the reverse unstated dramatization (the
opposite side of the coin) to the slavery enjoined by the mechanisms of the
mind.
Unless there is something to free men into, the act of freeing is simply
a protest of slavery. And as no humanoid is free while aberrated in the
body cycle, it is of course a gesture to free him politically as it frees
him only into the anarchy of dramatizing his aberrations with NO control
whatever and without something to fight exterior and with no
exteriorization of his interest he simply goes mad noisily or quietly.
Once as great a wrong as depraving beings has been done there is of
course no freedom short of freeing one from the depravity itself or at
least from its most obvious influences in the society. In short one would
have to de-aberrate a man before his whole social structure could be de-
aberrated.
If one lacked the whole ability to free man wholly
from his reactive patterns, then one could free man from their
restimulators in the society at least. If one had the