No matching fragments found in this document.
excellent. Ethics sure isn't interested. But if a staff member isn't
producing, shown by
his bad statistic for his post, Ethics is fascinated with his smallest
misdemeanor.
In short a staff member can get away with murder so long as his
statistic is up and
can't sneeze without a chop if it's down.
To do otherwise is to permit some suppressive person to simply Ethics
chit every
producer in the org out of existence.
When people do start reporting a staff member with a high statistic,
what you
investigate is the person who turned in the report.
In an ancient army a particularly brave deed was recognized by an award
of the
title of Kha-Khan. It was not a rank. The person remained what he was, BUT
he was
entitled to be forgiven the death penalty ten times in case in the future
he did anything
wrong. That was a Kha-Khan.
That's what producing, high statistic staff members are Kha-Khans. They
can get
away with murder without a blink from Ethics.
The average fair to poor statistic staff member of course gets just
routine ethics
with hearings or courts for too many misdeeds. The low statistic fellow
gets a court if
he sneezes.
Ethics must use all org discipline only in view of the production
statistic of the
staff member involved.
And Ethics must recognize a Kha-Khan when it sees one-and tear up the
bad
report chits on the person with a yawn.
To the staff member this means-if you do your job you are protected by
Ethics.
And if you aren't so protected and your statistic is high, cable me.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.rd
Copyright � 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED