Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.



whole of the data (but lacked the Scientology tech), one  would  simply  use
reactive patterns to blow the old society apart and then pick up the  pieces
neatly in a new pattern. If one had no inkling of how reactive one  can  get
(and Bolivar of course had no knowledge whatever in that field),  there  yet
remained  a  workable  formula  used  "instinctively"  by  most   successful
practical political leaders.

    If you free a society from those things you see wrong with  it  and  use
force to demand it do what is right, and if you carry forward with  decision
and  thoroughness,  and  without  continual  temporizing  you  can,  in  the
applications of your charm and gifts, bring about a great  political  reform
or improve a failing country.

    So Bolivar's first error, most consistent it was, too, was contained  in
the vital words "you see" in the above paragraph.  He  didn't  look  and  he
didn't even listen to sound intelligence reports. He was so  sure  he  could
glow things right or fight things right or charm things right that he  never
looked for anything wrong to correct until it was too late. This is the  ne-
plus-ultra of personal confidence, amounting to  supreme  vanity.  "When  he
appeared it would all come right" was not only  his  belief  but  his  basic
philosophy. So the first time it didn't work, he collapsed. All  his  skills
and charm were channeled into this one test. Only that could he observe.

    Not to compare with Bolivar but to show my understanding of this:

    I once had a similar one. "I would keep going as long  as  I  could  and
when I was stopped I would then die." This was a  solution  mild  enough  to
state and really hard to understand until you  had  an  inkling  of  what  I
meant by keeping going. Meteors keep going-very, very fast. And  so  did  1.
Then one day  ages  back  I  finally  was  stopped  after  countless  little
stoppings by social contacts and family to prepare me culminating in a  navy
more devoted to braid than dead enemies and literally I quit. For a while  I
couldn't get a clue  of  what  was  wrong  with  me.  Life  went  completely
unlivable until I found a new solution. So  I  know  the  frailty  of  these
single solutions. Not to compare myself but just to show it  happens  to  us
all, not just Bolivars.

    Bolivar had no personal insight at all. He  could  only  "outsight"  and
even then he did not look or listen. He glowed things  right.  Pitifully  it
was his undoing that he could. Until he no longer could.  When  he  couldn't
glow he roared and when he couldn't roar he  fought  a  battle.  Then  civic
enemies were not military enemies so he had no solution left at all.

    It never occurred to him to do more  than  personally  magnetize  things
into being right and victorious.

    His downfall was that he made far  too  heavy  use  of  a  skill  simply
because it was easy. He was too good at this one thing. So he  never  looked
to any other skill and he never even dreamed there was any other way.

    He had no view of any situation and no idea  of  the  organizational  or
preparatory steps necessary to political and personal victory. He only  knew
military organization which is where his organizational insight ceased.

    He was taught on the high  wine  of  French  revolt,  notorious  in  its
organizational inability to form cultures, and that fatally by  a  childhood
teacher who was  intensely  impractical  in  his  own  private  life  (Simon
Rodriguez, an unfrocked priest turned tutor).

    Bolivar had no personal financial skill. He started wealthy and wound up
a pauper, a statistic descending from one of the if not the richest  man  in
South America down to a borrowed nightshirt to be buried  in  as  an  exile.
And this while the property of Royalists was wide open,  the  greatest  land
and mine valuables of South America wide open to his  hand  and  that's  not
believable!  But  true.  He  never  collected  his  own  debt  of  loans  to
governments even when the head of those governments.

    So it is no wonder we find two more very  real  errors  leading  to  his
downfall. He did not get his troops or officers rewarded and he did not  aim
for any solvency of the states he controlled. It  was  all  right  if  there
were long years of battle ahead for them to be  unpaid  as  no  real  riches
were yet won, but not to reward  them  when  the  whole  place  was  at  his
disposal! Well!