No matching fragments found in this document.
To assemble all Sen materials. (Flopped by reason of non-compliance but
lately re-instituted.)
Dictionary Project to prevent misunderstood words. (In sporadic and
jerky action to this day.)
To handle legal situations which built up by non-compliance by attorneys
internal and external in org. (Under solution by forming Guardian Legal
Branch.)
To improve and maintain affluences. (Just begun.)
To help Scientology dissemination and attack more broadly to prevent
such quantities of legal defense. (OT Activities programme just begun.)
To safeguard, continue and expand all Scientology orgs. (Worked on a
bit, not really concentrated on except for Cash-Bills and Staff Status.)
General improvement of finances. (OT Activities.)
Buildings for Sen orgs. (OT Activities.)
To establish better audio-visio educational facilities. (Barely begun.)
________________
These have been and are the major programme steps which have been
implemented or are under development at Saint Hill since 1959 and forward
to the end of 1966.
Some of the years covered acquired names such as:
1965 - The Year of Organisation.
1966 - The Year of the Clears.
1967 - will probably be the Year of the O.T.'s.
_________________
It will be noted that each of these programmes solved a self-evident
problem.
It must be realized then that these problems did exist.
If the problems exist again, remember there was already a solution
programme and usually it has only been dropped and the problem reappeared
because it had been dropped. The proper directive action is to re-implement
and improve the solution which is to say in the case of SH, the carrying
out of the successful programmes noted above.
_________________
Ad Councils are always advancing new programmes and often it is only an
old programme dropped out that needs re-instituting, not a new solution.
Certainly an old problem has cropped up again.
There have been other programmes of course. Many solutions to old
problems and of major importance, are found in Policy Letters. Some
programmes although necessary have never been successfully implemented.
There was the motion picture programme but it is dogged by technical bugs
and became part of the Audio-Visio programme now being attempted. There has
been the re-write of all books programme but I've been too overworked to
attempt it.
Other future, self-evident programmes will come into being. They will
only fail if earlier programmes, dropped out or not given reorganisation
when needed, bring old problems into view by exposing them. All the
problems underlying the programme solutions above still potentially exist,
held in abeyance only by the programmes.
The best way to form programmes is to isolate actual problems at any
level of operation and solve them either by removing elements that make
them or by instituting a programme. Sensible planning tends toward both
actions.
An unsuccessful programme usually will be found to be solving the wrong
problem or is itself an improper solution to an actual problem.
If you want to establish the validity of a new programme offered by
someone, ask him what problem it is seeking to solve. You can then see if
you already have a solution to the problem, but most often you will see
that no clarified idea of the problem existed and so the solution is poor
or inadequate.