Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                  Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex


                    HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 OCTOBER 1967





Remimeo



                               ADMIN KNOW-HOW


                          CONDITIONS, HOW TO ASSIGN





    Every post and part of an org must have a statistic which  measures  the
volume of product of that post. The head of a  part  has  the  statistic  of
that post.

    Every post or part of an org has a product. If it has no product  it  is
useless and supernumerary.

    An Exec Sec has the products of his or her portion of the org. The first
product of an Exec Sec is  of  course  his  or  her  portion  of  the  org's
divisions. If the portion itself does not exist then of course the Exec  Sec
has no stat at all as an Exec Sec even if very busy-so he or she is  not  an
Exec Sec despite the title. This is true of a  department  head,  a  section
head and a unit head. One can't really be the one in  charge  if  the  thing
one is in charge of doesn't exist. Also things that don't  exist  themselves
can have no product.

    The whole rationale (basic idea) of the pattern of an org is a  unit  of
3. These are


    THETAN




      MIND            BODY                  PRODUCT.

    In Division One the HCO Sec is the  thetan,  Department  One  the  MIND,
Department Two the BODY and Department Three the PRODUCT. The  same  pattern
holds for every division.

    It also should hold for every department and lower section and unit.

    And above these it holds for a portion of an org.

    In the HCO portion of the org we have the HCO Exec Sec  as  the  thetan,
the Exec Div (7) as the MIND, Division One as the BODY and Division  Two  as
the PRODUCT. And so with other parts of an org. They always go

    THETAN




      MIND            BODY                  PRODUCT.

    Now if you know and understand and can apply this you can not only  plan
or correct an org or one of  its  parts,  you  can  also  assign  Conditions
correctly. You need data gained from inventories or counts of items  or  the
statistic assigned and drawn.

    It is not enough to only follow graphs. That is  a  lazy  lazy  lazy  no
confront method when used alone. Graphs can be falsified, can be  too  fixed
on one thing and can ignore others unless you read all  the  graphs  of  the
part you are interested in.

    Graphs are a good indicator and should be used  wherever  possible.  BUT
you must also keep in mind that it requires ALL  the  graphs  to  be  wholly
accurate in  a  Conditions  assignment  and  the  most  accurate  Conditions
assignment possible and that the graphs must be based on ACTUAL figures.

    So,  to  begin,  you  look  at  the  graphs.   You   look   for   recent
ups  and  downs.   Then  you look  for  trends  (long  range  drifts  up  or
down). Then you look for discrepancies.