Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

Where there is disagreement on a command channel I am trying to forward
then a by-pass occurs.

    So we can assume correctly on  experience  and  statistics  that  danger
conditions occur only when there are fundamental disagreements on a  command
channel.

    If you yourself then ferret out the disagreement  ones  of  those  under
your orders you will clear your command lines.

    Review can always find disagreements when they exist with a meter.

    Where Danger Conditions are declared,  the  declaring  executive  should
make an effort to find the disagreement with himself,  policy,  the  org  or
Scientology as a basic Review action on  persons  found  responsible  for  a
Danger Condition. The only errors are not to look for them and not  to  find
all the disagreements the person has on the subject  of  his  superiors  and
post, policy, technology or orders. "

    This is why a low leadership survey grade person can be  counted  on  to
put wherever he is in danger. His disagreements are too many and he  doesn't
execute and thereby secretly puts his superior into by-passing and a  danger
condition inevitably occurs.

    It needn't occur.

    We have the data, now.












                                               L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:ml.rd
Copyright � 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED