Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                  Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex


                   HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1967



Remimeo
Org Exec Course





                              POST, HANDLING OF








    Handling your post contains an element which is  easily  overlooked  but
without
which you may have many troubles hard to trace.

    IN ESSENCE YOU ARE WEARING MY ADMINISTRATIVE HAT FOR THAT
POST.

    You may wear the hat letter perfect and yet have a miss. As it is my hat
really, no
matter how small the post is, it has to be worn as I would wear it. The  air
and attitude
of how it's worn is important.

    Many an HCO Sec in the old days successfully got out of a tough  problem
by
asking, "What would Ron do in this situation?" And did  it  and  all  worked
out.

    Therefore it is worthwhile to know how I would go about things.

    I could detail for hours the admin indicators  and  admin  technology  I
use. But
you've got the bulk of it already in org policy letters.

    There are only a few things I might add that would help.

    One is that I work exclusively on the "Greatest good  for  the  greatest
number of
dynamics."

    I believe that to command is to serve and only gives one  the  right  to
serve.

    I have to be, above all things, effective and cannot fall short of being
effective or
explain ineffectiveness away.

    I never compromise with a situation to be agreeable.

    In handling something I figure out if I want to play that  game  or  not
and if I
don't I won't. And if I don't I will do anything needful to disconnect  from
it and if I
do I will do anything I can to win it.

    There is at least one, however, that is wildly out in  many  executives.
And that is
how I handle other posts.

    My entire concentration is to put  the  person  on  a  given  post  that
possibly can
handle it and then let him or her get on with it.

    The difference is this: others put a person on a post  and  then  hammer
and pound
him with orders as to how to handle it. If the appointee  gets  in  trouble,
others give him
streams of orders and directions.

    I don't. If a person has been trusted with a post I also  trust  him  to
handle it.

    If he or she obviously can't, I find another person who possibly can.

    I give a person on a post a lot of chances. I know  posts  are  hard  to
handle. But if
the statistic goes down and down and  stays  down,  and  no  admin  or  tech
advice has