No matching fragments found in this document.
The policy on them has always been THEY LEARN THEIR JOB AND DO THEIR
JOB OR THEY GO. We can't afford them. They can cost us the whole
organization,
and in two or three cases almost have.
They're too expensive when they don't learn their hats and general
policy or push
their duties off on others. One of them in an org costs at least two
additional staff
members to take care of their Dev-T and duties. Actual fact. Even where the
Dev-T
doesn't blow up an org. I could not possibly exaggerate their dangerousness
to an org,
fellow staff members and Scientology.
People who won't or can't learn policy or who continually alter it have
not
progressed case-wise to Level I. They cannot receive a comm so can't answer
or
respond properly and they do awfully wild things. They never dig what we're
at, so
they create a mess.
DUTIES OF AN EXECUTIVE
An executive keeps the organization on the road by getting people to get
the job
done. He may also have his own work and does that too and probably works
very hard
at it. But his organization duties are concerned mainly with enforcing
proper routing
and making people learn and adhere to policy. If an executive won't do that
his post
area or org is in a continual mess.
FLOODED IN BASKETS
All you have to do is look at an Executive's In Basket to know whether
he or she
is performing his or her executive duties. Although he or she may empty it
daily, if
there's much org traffic flowing through it you know at once that the
person does not
properly handle offline or offpolicy despatches.
This executive may be working day and night on the In Basket. It's the
volume of
org despatches that says the executive is not handling offline and
offpolicy despatches
or who has not provided proper routing in his post area. Such an executive
works
himself or herself half to death and is still unable to get his people out
of the red.
If the In Basket is merely stacked up, and isn't being handled at all,
it tells us that
this person simply doesn't do any job at all but is kidding people. In
actual experience
when we find a stacked up, unmoving In Basket we also find (a) pretended
busyness or
(b) just plain no action on post or (c) outright lies. But these conditions
cause an area
of upset in the org because somebody else above or below that person on the
org board
is unable to get his job done because of that "camouflaged hole" (means
post not filled
but only appears to be, thus leaving a hole in the line up). Such people
always cause
overwork by persons above or below them and are pretty dangerous to have
around.
POLICY ON DEV-T
Our policy on finding an habitually full In Basket which never gets
handled is to
(a) attempt to get the person's hat on and if that fails (b) transfer them
to a post they
really can do and if they don't work there (c) dismiss. We don't ever add
"processing"
into our policy of handling such people as they are well below Zero and
take too much
work on them to make them useful.
Policy now regarding the executives who work hard but have fantastic
staff
despatch volume is (a) have them read this policy letter and if their
volume doesn't
reduce (b) hat check them on this policy letter and if their volume still
doesn't fall to
very little traffic (c) have them do the org board in clay, do Scientology
orgs over the
world in clay, do their post in clay and review all policy letters relating
to their post
and the org and planning in general.
The complaint is not that this executive isn't working. The complaint is
that this
executive is not putting his post area together and helping, through
discipline of
offline, offpolicy despatches to put an organization there and put
Scientology across
over the world.
Such an executive, freed of the burden of handling offline and offpolicy
despatches will begin to do his own work industriously, will come out of
protest and
begin to handle and disseminate Scientology and will cease to flood
Scientology lines
by forwarding offline and offpolicy despatches.