Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

The priority of SEC EDs is as follows:

       LRH Personally written or personally sent

       SEC ED Adcouncil WW

       SEC ED Exec Sec WW

       SEC ED Adcouncil Area

       SEC ED Exec Sec Area

       SEC ED AdComm Area

       SEC ED Secretary Area.

    The penalty for not complying with a SEC ED is a  misdemeanor  and  must
result in an Executive Ethics Hearing or an Ethics Hearing.

    If Executive Secretaries in an area fail to respond to WW SEC EDs,  they
are usually scheduled for early removal by WW.

    SEC EDs have the virtue of making orders known and setting them on  file
where they can be referred to by other than the recipient.

    The only answers to a SEC ED if one isn't going to do it are:

    1.   An immediate petition to LRH on SEC EDs issued by LRH personally or

    2.   A job endangerment chit immediately filed in Ethics.

    If this step is lacking and it is found that  a  SEC  ED  has  not  been
complied with, then an Executive Ethics Hearing or an  Ethics  Hearing  MUST
follow when the non-compliance is discovered.

    Every single major danger condition at Saint Hill in 1965 was  found  to
have had as its source the non-compliance with a  SEC  ED.  If  this  policy
seems unduly harsh then add up that fact. Some of  these  danger  conditions
involved day and night work by top brass. And every one of them  would  have
been prevented had Ethics had this attitude  toward  non-compliance  with  a
SEC ED. The cost  of  these  non-compliances  ran  above  ?10,000  and  they
threatened the very existence of Scientology. And each one would  have  been
prevented had SEC EDs been complied with. From this, one should regard  non-
compliance with a SEC ED without instantly petitioning or filing a chit  for
job endangerment as something one does just before taking the arsenic.

    The only thing that holds down the size of Scientology today  is  simply
non-compliance. The only thing that makes trouble is non-compliance.

    The SEC ED system is  designed  to  make  orders  public  and  get  them
complied with fast.

    Conversely, if the order wasn't in a SEC ED or Policy  Letter,  it  does
not have Ethics force-that is to say one can't be seriously tried for it.

    All current projects and programmes should be in SEC EDs so people  know
what they are. Those written in despatches only are written in sand.

    SEC EDs can be confidential and of limited issue.

    SEC EDs expire one year from their date of issue if not sooner by reason
of their text.

    If a SEC ED is to be preserved beyond a year it must be converted into a
Policy Letter by sending it to LRH.

    The Director of Inspection and  Reports  is  responsible  for  routinely
checking the SEC ED file for non-compliances and  when  found  must  forward
the matter to Ethics for prompt action.






      L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:ml.rd
Copyright (c) 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED