Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

Recognizing the Basic Purpose, supplementing it with Sub-Purposes for the
parts of the whole, and learning and enforcing the policies which bring
success, spotting actual enemies or oppositions and planning and carrying
out campaigns to overcome them, removing distractions, rewarding the
forwarding of Basic Purpose and Sub-Purpose and penalizing actions which
retard, an individual, group, organization, civilization, race or species
survives, gets better, lives on higher and higher planes.

    The game of life has the  formula  of  having  and  forwarding  a  Basic
Purpose and supplemental Sub-Purposes.

    This is done by the Formula of Policy which consists of:

    1.   Conceiving, recognizing, testing and  codifying  successful  ideas,
    actions and procedures that forward the Basic  Purpose  and  retard  its
    opposition;

    2.   Making these  policies  known  and  in  greater  or  lesser  degree
    understood; and

    3.   Getting these policies followed.

    If in (3) policy is to be followed, there must be discipline,  but  even
more important, there must be ways  of  choosing  personnel  other  than  by
sloppy rumour or social presence.

    Personnel can only be chosen on raw statistics supported by  ample  data
containing figures. If the raw data is good, then  one  assumes  that  basic
purpose is being forwarded as it is  meeting  with  success.  The  raw  data
already has a curve in it as it is tabulated against the  success  of  basic
policy. So the person whose raw data  is  good  must  have  been  forwarding
basic purpose, therefore must be either a screaming  genius  at  originating
ideas that forward the Basic Purpose or a wizard at  knowing,  applying  and
following policy. Either way  he  or  she  is  worth  all  the  diamonds  of
Kimberley.

    Such a person will inevitably rise in the organization or group  if  raw
data alone is observed in selecting and promoting personnel.

    If the person is a screaming genius at originating policy  and  has  not
made enough errors to reduce his successful raw data,  and  has  stayed  on-
policy otherwise so as not to reduce the effectiveness of those around  him,
he will eventually rise  to  a  level  which  makes  policy  and  the  whole
organization will benefit. Similarly a person who grasps and follows  policy
very well and forwards the Basic Purpose well and who is very  capable  will
sooner or later  rise  to  a  position  of  trust  that  safeguards  against
sweeping changes that will retard or crash the group or organization and  so
is vital at higher levels.

    Out of these two general types of being one gets the  leadership  levels
of a movement. But they will never arrive at all if  those  in  charge  ever
use anything but statistics in judging them since their  very  success  will
cause enough cabal to influence high  levels  against  them  if  these  high
levels ever use fragmentary rumours or opinions in handling personnel.

    RAW  DATA  means  assembled  but  otherwise  unevaluated  data.  It   is
"uncooked" and "unflavoured" and "untouched by human hands". It,  in  short,
is  uncontaminated  or  unchanged  data.  It  is  native  and  natural   and
unspoiled.  And  the  only  data  that  answers  those   qualifications   is
statistical data. "How many or how few and how much or how  little  in  what
time."  That  is  the  only  data  that  a  senior  official  in  a   group,
organization or state ever dare use in selecting and promoting personnel.

    The "state" of the person, the "result of his tests",  "the  examination
figure" are all useless to a senior official deciding upon  who  to  promote
or pass over. His decision  will  be  wrong  in  exact  proportion  that  he
permits opinion to enter and raw data to drop out.

    Introducing opinion into personnel selection is a study  of  "how  crazy
can one get." How much liquor a man can hold,  how  acceptable  socially  is
his wife, his breath, his taste in ties are all completely disrelated  data.
For how does anyone know at the top really what the environment is now  like
at the bottom? Maybe that lovely  music  room-board  room  requires  a  pink
necktie, a purring wife and endless capacity for  drink,  but  is  that  the
organization's environment? It is not! Maybe the organization's  environment
demands an allergy to liquor, a  complete  tart  for  a  wife,  overwhelming
breath and neon ties. And maybe tomorrow's board level will too!  The  world
changes, it does not become softer. Only some people do.

    The psychiatric or school test alike are  written  and  administered  by
people in ivory towers who again have no  contact  with  the  organization's
real environment.