Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                  Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

|          |hco POLICY LETTER OF 13 MAY 1969                  |
|Remimeo   |(HCO Policy Letter of 14 November 1966, Revised)  |
|Guardian  |(Corrected and reissued)                          |
|ECs       |                                                  |
|LRH Comms |                                                  |
| hco area |HOW TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED POLICY LETTER            |
|Sec       |                                                  |
|Qual Sec  |                                                  |
|All Staff |                                                  |


    These are the rules one follows in proposing a Policy Letter:

    1. Make sure before you propose one that it is not already  in  existing
    policy or is not handling  a  non-existent  problem  (refer  HCO  Policy
    Letter of 23 April 1965, PROBLEMS).

    2. Write it clearly and simply  so  that  the  least  experienced  staff
    member, or student, or pc to whom it would apply can understand it.

    3. Type up the proposed Policy Letter exactly as it is to be issued.

    4. Give in the top left-hand  corner  the  distribution  of  the  Policy
    Letter (refer HCO Policy Letter of 14 April 1969,  BULLETIN  AND  POLICY
    LETTER DISTRIBUTION).

    5. Give the title of the Policy Letter and any sub-titles or sections in
    capital letters, following the format of existing Policy Letters.

    6. To be approved  (as  per  HCO  Policy  Letter  of  20  October  1966,
    SIGNATURES OF POL LTRS),  the  proposed  Policy  Letter  must  bear  the
    signatures of (1) the actual composer and (2)  each  passing  agency  or
    identity required to make it legal, as listed in paragraph #8, below.

    7. Attach to the proposed Policy Letter Completed Staff Work. Make  sure
    that all data is presented so that seniors up the line can attest on the
    basis of this CSW that it is OK and that The Guardian in  Policy  Review
    Section need only read the proposed Policy Letter and the CSW to OK  and
    issue it.

    8. Send the proposed Policy Letter and CSW to  the  following  terminals
    for their signature and attestation that the proposed Policy  Letter  is
    OK:
                 1.  One's seniors in one's own Division
                 2.  Qual Sec
                 3.  HCO Area Sec
                 4.  Ad Council (Local Org)
                 5.   Exec Council (Local Org)
                 6.  LRH Comm (Local Org)
                 7.  Ad Council WW
                 8.  Exec Council WW
                 9.  LRH Comm WW
                  and finally to The Guardian WW (Policy Review Section) for
                 issue.

    Any terminal along the way can either attest the Policy is OK, sign  and
pass it on, or say it is not OK, state reason why and return to  originator.
If you have a proposed Policy Letter sent to you which  violates  any  point
above, so note before returning that it may be  corrected  and  re-submitted
properly.

    There is no effort  to  stop  staff  members  from  proposing  necessary
policy, but to get it done properly so the line flows smoothly and rapidly.
                                          Tom Armistead, for Ad Council WW
                                          Jim Keely, Qual Sec WW
                                          Bruce Glushakow, HCO Area Sec WW
                                          Ad Council WW
                                          Exec Council WW
                                          Rodger Wright, LRH Comm WW
                                          Jane Kember, The Guardian WW
                                          for
                                          L. RON HUBBARD
                                          Founder
LRH: ei.rd
Copyright� 19 69
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[Revised by HCO P/L 26 June 1971, same title, in the 1971 Year Book.]