Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.



    His greatest error lay in that while dismissing Spain he did not dismiss
that nation's most powerful minion, the Church, and did  not  even  localize
it or reward a South American separate branch to loyalty or do  anything  at
all (except extort money from  it)  to  an  organization  which  continually
worked for Spain as only it could work-on every person  in  the  land  in  a
direct anti-Bolivar reign of terror behind the  scenes.  You  either  suborn
such a group or you take them out  when  they  cease  to  be  universal  and
become or are an enemy's partner.

    As  the  Church  held  huge  properties  and  as  Bolivar's  troops  and
supporters went unpaid, even of the penny soldiers' pay, if  one  was  going
to overlook the Royalist estates, one could at least have seized the  Church
property and given it to the soldiers. General Vallejo did this in  1835  in
California, a nearly contemporary act, with no  catastrophe  from  Rome.  Or
the penniless countries could have taken  them  over.  You  don't  leave  an
enemy financed and solvent while you let your friends starve in a game  like
South American politics. Oh no.

    He wasted his enemies. He exported  the  "godos"  or  defeated  Royalist
soldiers. They  mostly  had  no  homes  but  South  America.  He  issued  no
amnesties they could count on. They were shipped off or left to die  in  the
"ditch"-the best artisan in the country among them.

    When one (General Rodil) would not surrender Calloa fortress after  Peru
was won. Bolivar after great gestures of amnesty failed to obtain  surrender
and then  fought  the  fort.  Four  thousand  political  refugees  and  four
thousand Royalist troops died over  many  months  in  full  sight  of  Lima,
fought heavily by Bolivar only because the fort was  fighting.  But  Bolivar
had to straighten up Peru urgently not fight a  defeated  enemy.  The  right
answer to such a foolish commander as Rodil as Bolivar did have  the  troops
to do it,  was  to  cover  the  roads  with  cannon  enfilade  potential  to
discourage any sortie from the fort, put a larger number of his  own  troops
in a distant position of offense but ease and comfort and  say,  "We're  not
going to fight. The war's over, silly man. Look  at  the  silly  fellows  in
there, living on rats when they can just walk out and sleep home  nights  or
go to Spain or enlist with me or just go camping," and let anybody  walk  in
and out who pleased, making the fort Commander (Rodil)  the  prey  of  every
pleading wife and mother without and would-be deserter  or  mutineer  within
until he did indeed sheepishly give  up  the  pretense-a  man  cannot  fight
alone. But battle was glory to Bolivar. And  he  became  intensely  disliked
because the incessant cannonade which got nowhere was annoying.

    Honors meant a great deal to Bolivar. To be liked was his life.  And  it
probably meant more to him  than  to  see  things  really  right.  He  never
compromised his principles but he lived on admiration,  a  rather  sickening
diet since it demands in turn continuous "theatre". One is what one is,  not
what one is admired or hated for. To judge oneself  by  one's  successes  is
simply to observe that one's postulates  worked  and  breeds  confidence  in
one's ability. To have to be  told  it  worked  only  criticizes  one's  own
eyesight and hands a spear to the enemy to make his wound of vanity  at  his
will. Applause is nice. It's great to be thanked and admired.  But  to  work
only for that? And his craving for that, his addiction to the most  unstable
drug in history-fame-killed Bolivar. That self offered spear.  He  told  the
world continually how to kill him-reduce its esteem. So as  money  and  land
can buy any quantity of cabals, he could be killed by curdling  the  esteem,
the easiest thing you can get a mob to do.

    He had all the power. He did not use it for good  or  evil.  One  cannot
hold power and not use it. It  violates  the  power  formula.  For  it  then
prevents others from doing things if they had some  of  the  power  so  they
then see as their only solution the destruction of the holder of  the  power
as he, not using power or delegating it,  is  the  unwitting  block  to  all
their plans. So even many of his friends and armies finally  agreed  he  had
to go. They were not able men. They were in a mess. But  bad  or  good  they
had to do something. Things were desperate, broken down and  starving  after
14 years of civil war. Therefore they  either  had  to  have  some  of  that
absolute power or else nothing could be done at all.  They  were  not  great
minds. He did not need  any  "great  minds",  he  thought,  even  though  he
invited them verbally. He saw their petty, often murderous solutions and  he
rebuked them. And so held the power and didn't use it.

    He could not stand another personality threat.