Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

No matching fragments found in this document.

(c) Classification of it as Vital or simply useful.

    (d) The Primary Targets of it showing the organization needed to do it.

    (e) The Operating Targets showing its scheduling (even if scheduled  not
    with dates but days or weeks) and dove-tailing with other actions.

    (f) Its cost and whether or not  it  will  pay  for  itself  or  can  be
    afforded or how much money it will make.

    Complete Planning would have to include the Targets and the Plan of  the
thing.

    Thus, by redefining words and assigning labels to target  types  we  can
get a better grip on this.

    A Plan would be the design of the thing itself.

    Complete Planning would be all the targets plus the design.

    Thus we see why some things don't come off at all  and  why  they  often
don't get completed even when planned. The Plan is not put  forward  in  its
Target framework and so is unreal or doesn't get done.

    Also it's a great way to lose or waste money.

    Sometimes a Conditional Target fails to ask what obstacles or opposition
would be encountered or what skills are available and  so  can  go  off  the
rails in that fashion.




                           ______________________




    The whole subject of Plans, Targets and target types is new in the realm
of analyzed thought.

    It is a subject to "get the feel of" and  "learn  to  think  concerning"
rather than a fully "canned" subject.

    But if these points are grasped, then one sees the scope of the  subject
and can become quite brilliant and achieve things hitherto out of  reach  or
never thought of before.






      L. RON HUBBARD
      Founder



LRH:ldm.ei.rd
Copyright (c) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED