Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

It is also a clear fact that the route called Scientology does lead out of the labyrinth.

" All right, how about an auditor who abandons the procedure which will make his preclear eventually clear just because the preclear had a cognition? People have following the route mixed up with "the right to have their own ideas.

It means altering Scientology, off-beat practices.

Scientology is a workable system.

To get out of it requires that he follow the closely taped path of Scientology. Scientology will take him out of the labyrinth.

Scientology will take him out of the labyrinth.

Scientology, exactly and correctly followed, takes the person up and out of the mess.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

                  Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex


                    HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1965


                   (Reissued on 7 June 1967, with the word
                   "instructor" replaced by "supervisor".)



Remimeo
All Hats
BPI




                           SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY





    For some years we have had  a  word  "squirreling".  It  means  altering
Scientology,
off-beat practices. It is a bad thing. I have found a way to explain why.

    Scientology is a workable system. This does not  mean  it  is  the  best
possible system or a perfect  system.  Remember  and  use  that  definition.
Scientology is a workable system.

    In fifty thousand years of history  on  this  planet  alone,  Man  never
evolved a
workable system. It is doubtful if, in foreseeable  history,  he  will  ever
evolve another.

    Man is caught in a huge and complex labyrinth. To get out of it requires
that he
follow the closely taped path of Scientology.

    Scientology will take him out of the labyrinth. But only if  he  follows
the exact
markings in the tunnels.

    It has taken me a third of a century in this lifetime to tape this route
out.

    It has been proven that efforts by Man to find different routes came  to
nothing. It
is also a clear fact that the route called Scientology does lead out of  the
labyrinth.
Therefore it is a workable system, a route that can be travelled.

    What would you think of a guide who, because his party said it was  dark
and the
road rough and who said another tunnel looked better,  abandoned  the  route
he knew
would lead out and led his party to a lost nowhere in the dark. You'd  think
he was a
pretty wishy-washy guide.

    What would you think of a supervisor  who  let  a  student  depart  from
procedure
the supervisor  knew  worked.  You'd  think  he  was  a  pretty  wishy-washy
supervisor.

    What would happen in a labyrinth if the guide let some girl  stop  in  a
pretty
canyon and left her there forever to contemplate the rocks? You'd  think  he
was a
pretty heartless guide. You'd expect him  to  say  at  least,  "Miss,  those
rocks may be
pretty, but the road out doesn't go that way."

    All right, how about an auditor who abandons the  procedure  which  will
make his
preclear eventually clear just because the preclear had a cognition?

    People have following the route mixed up with "the right to  have  their
own
ideas." Anyone  is  certainly  entitled  to  have  opinions  and  ideas  and
cognitions-so long
as these do not bar the route out for self and others.

    Scientology is a workable system. It white tapes the  road  out  of  the
labyrinth. If
there were no white tapes marking the right tunnels, Man would  just  go  on
wandering
around and around the way he has for  eons,  darting  off  on  wrong  roads,
going in
circles, ending up in the sticky dark, alone.

    Scientology, exactly and correctly followed, takes the person up and out
of the
mess.

    So when you see somebody having a ball getting everyone to  take  peyote
because