Showing fragments matching your search for: <strong>""</strong>

Primarily his duties consist of Inspecting and Reporting to his divisional head and the Executive Council.

By condition assignments, publication and Comm Evs he gets in Ethics.

Hitting people with conditions is such a small part of Ethics that it is almost an abandonment of post.

Letting people be hit with wrong conditions is a Comm Ev offense.

You DON'T confuse an executive's effort to get the stats up with suppression.

He is making it unsafe for those who by neglect or continual errors or suppression push stats down and get good staff members to leave.

TWO SECTIONS The Ethics Section is in Department 3.

The second section of Department 3 is Ethics. Now it is an Ethics matter.

Now it is an Ethics matter.

Because he has files of damage reports and chits and because he can see and investigate, the Ethics Officer locates WHO is causing outnesses and suppressing the org.

By condition assignments, publication and Comm Evs he gets in Ethics. It occasionally happens that it is someone high up in the org.

The Ethics Officer can only be in trouble if he fails to do his job and keep in Ethics.

The Ethics Officer can only be in trouble if he fails to do his job and keep in Ethics. Hitting people with conditions is such a small part of Ethics that it is almost an abandonment of post.

An Ethics Officer uses Ethics to protect Ethics upstats and keep the stats up and to smoke out crimes that push people and stats down.

When they don't and stats fall or people fall off the org board, one goes into Ethics actions.

You don't let incompetent and suppressive people on staff in the first place and you crowd Ethics in on them if they're found to be there.

The E/0 must know his Ethics policy.

So if someone doesn't hold the line, all become victims of oppression.

                                TWO SECTIONS


    The Ethics Section  is  in  Department  3.  This  department  is  called
Inspection and Reports.

    In small orgs there is only one person in that department.

    Primarily  his  duties  consist  of  Inspecting  and  Reporting  to  his
divisional head and the Executive Council.

    That is the first section's function.

    WHEN inspection reveals outness and reports (such as  graphs  or  direct
info to the EC) do not result in correction THEN it  is  a  matter  for  the
second section.

    The second section of Department 3 is Ethics.

    Now it is  an  Ethics  matter.  If  correctly  reported  outnesses  that
threaten the org  are  NOT  corrected  then  one  assumes  that  suppression
exists.

    Because he has files of damage reports and chits and because he can  see
and investigate, the Ethics Officer locates WHO  is  causing  outnesses  and
suppressing the org. By condition assignments, publication and Comm  Evs  he
gets in Ethics.

    It occasionally happens that it is  someone  high  up  in  the  org.  It
sometimes happens his seniors or the EC scold him for daring  to  report  on
things or to them. Then he knows the  suppression  is  high  up  and  he  is
delinquent in duty if he does not report it to the next highest org  and  if
no action there right on up to the Sea Org. Anyone removing him  for  daring
to report the factual results of his inspections can be severely handled  by
upper organizations. The Ethics Officer can only be in trouble if  he  fails
to do his job and keep in Ethics.

    Hitting people with conditions is such a small part of Ethics that it is
almost an abandonment of post. Letting people be hit with  wrong  conditions
is a Comm Ev offense.

    Letting an SP collapse stats or an org is a shooting offense.

    An Ethics Officer uses Ethics to protect Ethics  upstats  and  keep  the
stats up and to smoke out crimes that push people and stats down.  It  is  a
simple function.

    The basic duties of Dept 3 are what it  says.  Inspection  and  Reports.
These alone usually work. When they don't and stats fall or people fall  off
the org board, one goes into Ethics actions.

    You don't let incompetent and suppressive people on staff in  the  first
place and you crowd Ethics in on them if they're found to be there.

    You DON'T confuse an  executive's  effort  to  get  the  stats  up  with
suppression.

    The E/0 is making the environment safe so that production can occur  and
service can be given. He is making it unsafe for those  who  by  neglect  or
continual errors or suppression push stats down and get good  staff  members
to leave.

    If none of this  is  well  understood  and  yet  someone  is  making  it
impossible to work, find a 9 foot high board fence. .....

    The E/0 must know his Ethics policy. He must understand why he is there.

    And the rest of the people in the org should understand it too.






                                               L. RON HUBBARD
                                               Founder


LRH:rs.ldm.rd
Copyright® 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED