No matching fragments found in this document.
Date: 21 Aug 1999 01:59:58 -0000
Subject: FZ Bible NEW TECH VOL XII 05/17 (1980-4)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <4099c5493b7ae3922e232b159bf0d032@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 2480
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!isdnet!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newshub.northeast.verio.net!kiowa!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:899764 alt.clearing.technology:97261
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
NEW TECH VOL XII 05/17 (1980-4)
**************************************************
NEW TECH VOLUME XII 1980-84
(As issued in 1991 by CofS)
==================
[Because of its large size, the complete contents only appears
in part 0 and part 1.]
CONTENTS:
Part 5
029. HCOB 12 JUN 80R r. 5 Nov 82 THE BASICS OF ETHICS
030. HCOB 23 JUL 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST - LCRE
031. HCOB 25 JUL 80RA r. 12 Jul 88 COURSE SUP. CORR. LIST WORD LIST
032. HCOB 29 JUL 80 CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY
033. HCOB 30 JUL 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING
034. HCOB 2 SEP 80 REPAIR CORRECTION LIST WORDS
035. HCOB 11 SEP 80 L4BRB WORD LIST
036. HCOB 16 SEP 80R r. 4 Jul 88 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST WORD LIST
037. HCOB 17 SEP 80R r. 8 Apr 88 L3RH WORD LIST
038. HCOB 17 SEP 80RA r. 28 Jun 90 GREEN FORM WORD LIST
039. HCOB 28 SEP 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE WORDS LIST
040. HCOB 6 OCT 80 GENERAL STAFF CONFESSIONAL LIST
041. HCOB 6 OCT 80 SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL LIST
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
==================
029. HCOB 12 JUN 80R r. 5 Nov 82 THE BASICS OF ETHICS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JULY 1980R
REVISED 5 NOVEMBER 1982
(Also issued as HCO PL same date, same title)
Remimeo
All HCOs
Tech Sec
Ds of Ts
Supervisors
Ethics Officers
Cramming Officers
Students
All Staff
All Hats
THE BASICS OF ETHICS
Refs:
Dianetic Auditor's Bulletin PREVENTIVE DIANETICS
Vol I, No. 12, June 51 (Section on Morals and Ethics)
PAB 40, 26 Nov. 54 THE CODE OF HONOR
Book: Science of Survival Chapter 21, "Ethic Level"
HCO PL 9 July 80 ETHICS, JUSTICE AND THE DYNAMICS
Ethics and Justice Pack in The Volunteer Minister's Handbook
HCO PL 1 Sept. 65 VII ETHICS PROTECTION
HCO PL 29 Apr. 65 III ETHICS-REVIEW
HCOB 27 May 60 II DEAR SCIENTOLOGIST
HCO PL 12 Apr. 65 JUSTICE
HCO PL 11 May 65 ETHICS OFFICER HAT
HCO PL 6 Mar. 66 REWARDS AND PENALTIES, HOW TO HANDLE PERSONNEL
AND ETHICS MATTERS
HCO PL 29 Dec. 66 HISTORICAL PRECEDENCE OF ETHICS
HCO PL 18 June 68 ETHICS
HCO PL 4 Oct. 68 ETHICS PRESENCE Rev. 10.7.80
HCO PL 7 Dec. 69 ETHICS, THE DESIGN OF
HCO PL 7 Dec. 69II THE ETHICS OFFICER, HIS CHARACTER
HCO PL 24 Feb. 69 JUSTICE
HCO PL 7 Sept. 63 COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE SCIENTOLOGY JURISPRUDENCE,
ADMINISTRATION OF
HCO PL 17 Mar. 65III ADMINISTERING JUSTICE
HCO PL 24 Feb. 72 INJUSTICE
Throughout the ages, man has struggled with the subjects of
right and wrong and ethics and justice.
The dictionary defines ethics as "the study of the general
nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be
made by the individual in his relationship with others."
The same dictionary defines justice as "conformity to moral
right, or to reason, truth or fact," or "the administration
of law."
As you can see, these terms have become confused.
All philosophies from time immemorial have involved
themselves with these subjects. And they never solved them.
That they have been solved in Dianetics and Scientology is
a breakthrough of magnitude. The solution lay, first, in
their separation. From there it could go forward to a
workable technology for each.
ETHICS consists simply of the actions an individual takes
on himself. It is a personal thing. When one is ethical or
"has his ethics in," it is by his own determinism and is
done by himself.
JUSTICE is the action taken on the individual by the group
when he fails to take these actions himself.
HISTORY
These subjects are, actually, the basis of all philosophy.
But in any study of the history of philosophy it is plain
that they have puzzled philosophers for a long tlme.
The early Greek followers of Pythagoras (Greek philosopher
of the sixth century B.C.) tried to apply their
mathematical theories to the subject of human conduct and
ethics. Some time later, Socrates (Greek philosopher and
teacher, 470?399 B.C.) tackled the subject. He demonstrated
that all those who were claiming to show people how to live
were unable to defend their views or even define the terms
they were using. He argued that we must know what courage,
and justice, law and government are before we can be brave
or good citizens or just or good rulers. This was fine, but
he then refused to provide definitions. He said that all
sin was ignorance but did not take the necessary actions to
rid man of his ignorance.
Socrates' pupil, Plato (Greek philosopher, 427?-347 B.C.)
adhered to his master's theories but insisted that these
definitions could only be defined by pure reason. This
meant that one had to isolate oneself from life in some
ivory tower and figure it all out-not very useful to the
man in the street.
Aristotle (Greek philosopher, 384-322 B.C.) also got
involved with ethics. He explained unethical behavior by
saying-that man's rationality became overruled by his desire.
This chain continued down the ages. Philosopher after
philosopher tried to resolve the subjects of ethics and
justice.
Unfortunately, until now, there has been no workable
solution, as evidenced by the declining ethical level of
society.
So you see it is no small breakthrough that has been made
in this subject in the last 30 years or so. We have defined
the terms, which Socrates omitted to do, and we have a
workable technology that anyone can use to help get himself
out of the mud.
The natural laws behind this subject have been found and
made available for all to use.
ETHICS
Ethics is so native to the individual that when it goes off
the rails he will always seek to overcome his own lack of
ethics.
He knows he has an ethics blind spot the moment he develops
it. At that moment he starts trying to put ethics in on himself,
and to the degree that he can envision long-term survival
concepts, he may be successful, even though lacking the
actual tech of ethics.
All too often, however, the bank is triggered by an
out-ethics situation; and if the individual has no tech
with which to handle it analytically, his "handling" is to
mock up motivators. In other words, he tends to believe or
pretend that something was done to him that prompted or
justified his out-ethics action, and at that point he
starts downhill.
It is not his attempt to get his ethics in that does him
in. It is the automaticity of the bank which kicks in on
him and his use of a bank mechanism at this point which
sends him down the chute. When that happens, nobody puts
him down the chute harder, really, than he does himself.
And, once on the way down, without the basic technology of
ethics, he has no way of climbing back up the chute-he just
caves himself in directly and deliberately.
And even though he has a lot of complexities in his life,
and he has other people doing him in, it all starts with
his lack of knowledge of the technology of ethics.
This, basically, is one of the primary tools he uses to dig
himself out.
BASIC NATURE OF MAN
No matter how criminal an individual is, he will be trying,
one way or another, to put ethics in on himself.
This explains why Hitler invited the world to destroy
Germany. He had the whole war won before September 1939,
before he declared war. The Allies were giving him
everything he wanted; he had one of the finest intelligence
organizations that ever walked; he had Germany well on the
way to getting her colonies back and the idiot declared
war! And he just caved himself and Germany right in. His
brilliance was going at a mad rate in one direction and his
native sense of ethics was causing him to cave himself in
at a mad rate in the other direction.
The individual who lacks any ethics technology is unable to
put in ethics on himself and restrain himself from
contrasurvival actions, so he caves himself in. And the
individual is not going to come alive unless he gets hold
of the basic tech of ethics and applies it to himself and
others. He may find it a little unpalatable at first, but
when you're dying of malaria you don't usually complain
about the taste of the quinine: you may not like it, but
you sure drink it.
JUSTICE
When the individual fails to put in his own ethics, the
group takes action against him and this is called justice.
I have found that man cannot be trusted with justice. The
truth is, man cannot really be trusted with "punishment."
With it he does not really seek discipline; he wreaks
injustice. He dramatizes his inability to get his own
ethics in by trying to get others to get their ethics in: I
invite you to examine what laughingly passes for "justice"
in our current society.
Many governments are so touchy about their divine rightness
in judicial matters that you hardly open your mouth before
they burst into uncontrolled violence. Getting into police
hands is a catastrophe in its own right in many places,
even when one is merely the plaintiff, much less the
accused. Thus, social disturbance is at maximum in such areas.
When the tech of ethics isn't known, justice becomes an
end-all in itself. And that just degenerates into a sadism.
Governments, because they don't understand ethics, have
"ethics committees," but these are all worded in the
framework of justice.
They are even violating the derivation of the word ethics.
They write justice over into ethics continuously with
medical ethics committees, psychological ethics committees,
congressional committees, etc. These are all on the basis
of justice because they don't really know what ethics is.
They call it ethics but they initiate justice actions and
they punish people and make it harder for them to get their
own ethics in.
Proper justice is expected and has definite use. When a
state of discipline does not exist, the whole group caves
in. It has been noted continually that the failure of a
group began with a lack of or loss of discipline. Without
it the group and its members die. But you must understand
ethics and justice.
The individual can be trusted with ethics, and when he is
taught to put his own ethics in, justice no longer becomes
the all-important subject that it is made out to be.
BREAKTHROUGH
The breakthrough in Scientology is that we do have the
basic technology of ethics. For the first time man can
learn how to put his own ethics in and climb back up the chute.
This is a brand-new discovery; before Scientology it had
never before seen the light of day, anywhere. It marks a
turning point in the history of philosophy. The individual
can learn this technology, learn to apply it to his life
and can then put his own ethics in, change conditions and
start heading upwards toward survival under his own steam.
I hope you will learn to use this technology very well for
your own sake, for the sake of those around you and for the
sake of the future of this culture as a whole.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
030. HCOB 23 JUL 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST - LCRE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JULY 1980R
REVISED 26 JULY 1986
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors,
Class II
and Above
CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE
This HCOB cancels and replaces all of the following:
HCOB 30 July 70 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST L-CR
HCOB 8 Dec. 72 INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST L1R
HCOB 8 Dec. 72R INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST L1R Rev. 12.2.73
BTB 8 Dec. 72R INTEGRITY PROCESSING REPAIR LIST L1R
BTB 8 Dec. 72RA INTEGRITY PROCESSING AND O/Ws REPAIR LIST-L1RA
BTB 8 Dec. 72RB CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRB
BTB 8 Dec. 72RC CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRC
HCOB 23 July 80 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST LCRD
This is the prepared list to use for repairing a
Confessional, whether done as auditing or as an HCO
Confessional. It is also for use in handling BPC from other
O/W actions such as O/W write-ups.
If, after a Confessional or O/W write-up, the person red
tags at the Examiner or if he gets sick or upset or falls
on his head, this list is assessed and handled to
straighten the matter GUt. The repair action would be a
24-hour repair priorlty.
If there is a bog during a Confessional action, the auditor
would first check for missed withholds, false reads and ARC
breaks, in that order, and handle what he found. (Ref: HCOB
30 Nov. 78R, CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE) If this does not
resolve the difficulty, one should use the LCRE.
The list is usually assessed Method 3, but may be assessed
Method 5 in the case of a severe pc upset or as directed by
the C/S.
The list should be used with a prefix which acts as a time
limiter, such as "In this session,_____ ?" or "On your O/W
write-up,_____?"
PRECLEAR: _____________ DATE:_______________
AUDITOR: ______________________________________
1. OUT-INT? _________
(If you get a valid read, not a false or protest read, indicate
it. If the pc has had an Int RD or End of Endless Int RD previously,
assess and handle the Int RD Correction List. If the pc has not
had previous Int handling or if the Int RD Correction List does
not fully resolve the situation, do an Int RD or, on a Clear or OT,
the End of Endless Int RD. If you are not qualified to deliver the
Int RD or the End of Endless Int RD, end off for a qualified
auditor to handle.)
2. LIST ERROR? _________
(Indicate. If Class III or above, find out what list and repair
with L4BRA. If not Class III, end off for handling by a Class III
or above.)
3. WRONG ITEM? _________
(Handle as in #2.)
4. WAS THERE AN ARC BREAK? _________
(ARCU, CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
5. WAS THERE A PROBLEM? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
6. WAS A WITHHOLD MISSED? _________
(Pull it getting who nearly found out, etc., E/S to F/N.)
7. DID YOU TELL PART OF A WITHHOLD BUT NOT THE REST? _________
(Get all of the withhold, flatten it E/S to F/N.)
8. DID YOU MISDIRECT THE AUDITOR? _________
(Handle as an overt, E/S to F/N. Flatten any unflat Confessional
chain uncovered.)
9 . DID YOU AVOID TELLING ONE OVERT BY GIVING A DIFFERENT ONE? _________
(Pull the overt the pc avoided telling, E/S to F/N.)
10 . WERE YOU WAITING FOR A MORE SPECIFICALLY WORDED QUESTION? _________
(Find out what Sec Check question the pc was waiting for and get
it answered, to F/N.)
11. DID THE AUDITOR FAIL TO FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT YOU? _________
(Handle as a missed withhold, E/S to F/N.)
12. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER A SEC CHECK QUESTION? _________
(Find out which question and handle to F/N.)
13. DID YOU DELIBERATELY NOT ANSWER A SEC CHECK QUESTION? _________
(Find out what question and handle to F/N.)
14. DID YOU WITHHOLD SAYING SOMETHING FOR FEAR
OF GETTING INTO ETHICS TROUBLE? _________
(Handle to F/N as per Sec Checking procedure.)
15. DID YOU TRY TO LESSEN AN OVERT? _________
(Find out how he tried to lessen the overt and complete its
handling to F/N.)
16. HAS AN OVERT BEEN JUSTIFIED? _________
(Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete to F/N.)
17. WAS THERE SOME OTHER WAY YOU JUSTIFIED THE OVERT? _________
(Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete its
handling to F/N.)
18. WORRIED ABOUT REPUTATION? _________
(Clean it up with 2WC E/S to F/N.)
19. ARE THERE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
20. WAS THERE AN EARLIER OVERT UNDISCLOSED? _________
(Pull it E/S to F/N.)
21 . WAS A CHAIN OF OVERTS NOT TAKEN BACK TO BASIC? _________
(Take it back to basic.)
22. WAS AN OVERT TOO LATE ON THE CHAIN? _________
(Get the earlier overt and take the chain to F/N.)
23. JUMPED TO A DIFFERENT OVERT CHAIN? _________
(Reorient to the original chain and take it to F/N. Then
flatten the chain the pc jumped to, if reading.)
24. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING? _________
(Get what it is, E/S to F/N.)
25. DID YOU TELL A HALF-TRUTH? _________
(Get all of the withhold, handle E/S to F/N.)
26. WAS THERE SOMETHING THE AUDITOR SHOULD HAVE
KNOWN ABOUT YOU THAT HE DIDN'T? _________
(Get what. Pull it E/S to F/N.)
27 . WAS THERE AN UNDISCLOSED OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? _________
(Get it off as a missed W/H, E/S to F/N.)
28. HAS A CRIME BEEN COVERED UP? _________
(Pull it, E/S to F/N.)
29. WAS THERE MORE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN
ABOUT SOME OVERT? _________
(Get it all, E/S to F/N.)
30. WAS THERE A QUESTION THAT THE AUDITOR SAID
DIDN'T READ THAT SHOULD HAVE? _________
(Find out what question and get in Suppress and Inval on it.
Then handle it to F/N.)
31. DID THE AUDITOR CALL AN F/N WHEN YOU DIDN'T
FEEL YOU WERE F/Ning? _________
(Find the point and get in Suppress on it, and complete the
action to F/N.)
32. DID YOU TELL A LIE? _________
(Handle as a W/H, to F/N.)
33. WAS A QUESTION LEFT UNFLAT? _________
(Find out which one, indicate it and handle to F/N.)
34. WAS AN F/N OVERRUN? _________
(Find out on what Sec Check question or overt chain and rehab. )
35. WAS AN F/N MISSED? _________
(Find out on what Sec Check question or overt chain and rehab.)
36. DID SOMEONE DEMAND A W/H YOU DIDN'T HAVE? _________
(Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N.)
37. HAD YOU TOLD ALL? _________
(Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N.)
38. WAS AN OVERT PROTESTED? _________
(Get what it was and get in Protest button on it. Fully
clean up the overt to F/N.)
39. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _________
(Get who wouldn't accept it or said it still read. Indicate
it was a false read. 2WC the concern to F/N.)
40. DID YOU HAVE TO GET THE SAME WITHHOLD OFF
MORE THAN ONCE? _________
(Handle as in #39.)
41. DID SOMEONE SAY YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN'T? _________
(Indicate it, 2WC E/S to F/N. For auditors trained to D/L, date to
blow and locate to blow the first instance of the pc being told he
had that W/H when he didn't.)
42. DID SOMEONE SAY OR SEEM TO INFER THAT
SOMETHING READ WHEN IT DIDN'T? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. For auditors trained to D/L, date to blow and
locate to blow the first instance of the pc being told that.)
43. WAS THERE AN OVERT OR WITHHOLD THAT WASN'T ACCEPTED? _________
(Get what. Get who wouldn't accept it. Get off any protest and
inval, and clean it up E/S to F/N.)
44. DID SOMEONE INVALIDATE YOU FOR GETTING OFF A WITHHOLD? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
45 . DID SOMEONE PUNISH YOU FOR GETTING OFF A WITHHOLD? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
46. WAS THERE A FALSE ACCUSATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
47. NOT YOUR OVERT? _________
(Indicate it. If it doesn't F/N on indication, take it E/S to F/N.)
48. WERE YOU NOT HONEST WITH THE AUDITOR? _________
(Handle as a missed withhold, E/S to F/N.)
49 . DID YOU HAVE AN INTENTION TO MAKE OTHERS WRONG? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for full service fac
handling and False Purpose Rundown.)
50. WAS THERE A COMPUTATION YOU USED TO MAKE
YOURSELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program for full service fac handling.)
51. FALSELY VILIFYING SOMEONE TO COVER UP AN EVIL PURPOSE? _________
(Get it off as an overt E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for
False Purpose Rundown.)
52. WAS THERE AN EVIL PURPOSE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose
Rundown.)
53. WAS SOME BAD INTENTION NOT DISCOVERED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose
Rundown.)
54. WAS SOME HIDDEN EVIL IMPULSE NOT REVEALED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose
Rundown.)
55 . WAS THERE SOME NONSURVIVAL CONSIDERATION YOU
DIDN'T MENTION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to program the case for False Purpose
Rundown.)
56. WERE YOU PRETENDING TO BE PTS TO AVOID TAKING
RESPONSIBILITY FOR SOME OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? _________
(Handle as a withhold to F/N. Pull any overts.) (C/S to program
the case for False Purpose Rundown.)
57 . DID THE AUDITOR NOT HEAR OR ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT YOU SAID? _________
(Indicate the BPC. Get what the auditor missed and clean it up
E/S to F/N.)
58. DID THE AUDITOR GET ANGRY AT YOU? _________
(If this happened, indicate it is illegal to do so. 2WC E/S to F/N.
Clean up any ARC break to F/N.) (C/S to program for a
QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I.)
59. WERE THERE AUDITOR'S CODE BREAKS? _________
(Get what. Indicate it was illegal and 2WC E/S to F/N.) (C/S to
program for a QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I.)
60. WERE YOU AFRAID OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
61. WAS THERE AN INJUSTICE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
62. WAS THERE A BETRAYAL? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
63. WAS ANYTHING SUPPRESSED? _________
(Clean it up E/S to F/N.)
64. WAS ANYTHING INVALIDATED? _________
(Clean it up E/S to F/N.)
65. WAS ANYTHING FALSIFIED? _________
(Clean it up as a W/H E/S to F/N.)
66. WAS ANYTHING PROTESTED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
67. WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
68. WAS SOMETHING MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
(Clean it up, clearing any MU words each to F/N.)
69. WERE YOU TIRED OR HUNGRY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
70. HAD YOU RECENTLY TAKEN DRUGS? MEDICINE? ALCOHOL? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for C/S.)
71. WERE YOU BEING SEC CHECKED ON A WRONG AREA? _________
(2WC to F/N, getting the area or subject pc feels he should be sec
checked on and noting these for the C/S.)
72. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(If so and it doesn't clean up on 2WC, GF M5 and handle.)
73. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED? _________
(2WC. If so, indicate it to F/N.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
031. HCOB 25 JUL 80RA r. 12 Jul 88 COURSE SUP. CORR. LIST WORD LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 JULY 1980RA
REVISED 12 JULY 1988
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST
WORD LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 27 Mar. 72RA II, COURSE SUPERVISOR
CORRECTION LIST.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the list is
actually assessed on him, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING
COMMANDS.
The staff auditor or intern must have received high-crime
checkouts from Qual on the above references before clearing
these words in session on an org pc. (Ref: HCO PL 8 Mar.
66, KSW Series 13, HIGH CRIME)
The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing these words.
This word list need only be cleared once in the pc's
auditing if correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
HCOB 30 Oct. 87, Auditor Admin Series 6RA, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE COURSE SUPERVISOR
CORRECTION LIST
A, ability, about, afraid, after, already, an, and,
another, answer, any, anyway, apply, ARC break, are, as,
at, attained, available.
Be, been, being, believe, bog, bogged, bound, bulletins, by.
Can, cannot, can't, case, certain, class, clearing,
competence, condition, conflict, confront, confronted,
connection, consequences, consider, control, correction,
course, course room, courses, covered, cramming, cross.
Debug, demos, destructive, did, didn't, disagreements, do,
does, dog, doing, done, don't, double, doubt, drugs,
duress, during.
Else, encountered, enough, ethics, evil, experimenting.
Fail, falsify, feel, find, fixed, F/Ning, for, forced,
found, from, fully.
Get, getting, give, giving, good, graduated, graduates.
Had, handle, handled, has, hasn't, hatted, have, he,
helped, helping, here, how, hung up.
Ideas, if, important, in, incomplete, incorrectly, instead,
intention, interesting, interpreting, interrupting, is,
issues, it.
Knew, know, knowledgeable.
Lack, leaving, left, less, like, list, losses, lots.
Make, many, materials, messed up, Method 9 Word Clearing,
methods, misemotion, missing, misunderstoods, more.
Native, neglecting, never, new, no, not.
Of, on, or, order, orders, other, others, out, out-Int,
out-list, outnesses, over, overt, overwhelmed, own.
Past, patience, people, physically, policy, popular, post,
powerful, preventing, problem, product, prove, purpose.
Questions.
Rather, really, reason, received, refer, regulated,
responsible, right.
Said, should, shouldn't, situations, so, some, somebody,
someone, something, staff, started, statistic, stats,
status, student, students, student's, students', studied,
study, study tech, subject, supervise, supervised,
supervising, supervision, Supervisor, Supervisor's,
suppressive.
Teach, teaching, tech, than, that, the, their, them; there,
think, third partying, time, tired, to, told, too, trouble,
TRs, trying.
Unable, understand, unwell, upset, use, using.
Verbal.
Want, was, were, what, when, who, why, will, with,
withhold, word, Word Clearing tech, words, work, worked,
working, works, worth, would, wrong.
You, your, yourself.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
032. HCOB 29 JUL 80 CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY 1980
Remimeo
CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY
Almost every modern horror crime was committed by a known
criminal who had been in and out of the hands of psychiatrists
and Psychologists, often many times.
There is no particular reason to enumerate endless case
histories of this; they occur too frequently in news
accounts and the newspaper morgues are thick with them. And
as such stories develop, it is found that the perpetrator
had a long history, some even from childhood, of
psychiatric and psychological treatment.
Such a record of failure does not seem to come to the
attention of legislators, and these continue to pour floods
of money into the coffers of the psychiatrists,
psychologists and their organizations. The public at large,
by survey, seems to be aware of this state of affairs, if
not the whole facts: the only real customers the
psychiatrist and psychologist have are the governments -
the public does not of its own volition go to them.
The most charitable look at this would be that the
psychologists and psychiatrists are simply incompetent.
But other more sinister implications can be drawn.
Developed in the latter part of the nineteenth century,
they appeared on the militaristic scene of a rearming and
conquest-minded Germany. At that time, the archcriminal
Bismarck was laying the groundwork for the slaughters of
World War I and World War II. It fitted with the philosophy
of militarism that man was an animal and that there was
neither soul nor morality standing in the way of the
wholesale murder of war.
Up until that time the Church had some influence upon the
state and possibly some power in restraining bestiality and
savagely insane conduct, but small as it might have been,
it was incompatible with the unholy ambitions of the
militarists.
That man was only an animal after all, soulless and
entitled to no decency, was bound to be a popular doctrine.
That insanity consisted of urges to harm others would have
been a very unpopular idea to government heads who had
nothing else in mind. And so the notion that insanity was a
physical disease was taken up avidly.
The basic tenet of psychology is that man is just an
animal. The basic tenet of psychiatry is that insanity is a
physical disease. Neither has any proof that these tenets
are correct. That man can be reduced to animalistic
behavior does not prove that that is his true basic nature.
That some physical diseases also produce mental aberration
does not prove that any "mental illness" has bacteria or
virus and indeed none have ever been isolated.
The instigators, patrons and supporters of these two
subjects classify fully and demonstrably as criminals.
If the crimes committed by a government in one single day
were committed by an individual, that individual would be
promptly put in a cell and probably even a padded cell.
Unfortunately, positions of power and authority attract to
themselves beings who, all too often, need that altitude to
exercise their lust for covertly or overtly harming others.
Government positions are well suited to this use; they are
also all too often held to be above any law. Some of the
most notorious criminals in history have operated from
government positions. This becomes statistically impressive
when one counts the strewn corpses.
Looking this over (and it is amply documented in any history
book or newspaper) one can begin to make some kind of sense
out of it. Spawned by an insanely militaristic government,
psychiatry and psychology find avid support from oppressive
and domineering governments. The employer of these people
c]assifies, even in the most generous view, as criminal.
Thus, it cannot be much wondered at that these subjects
have no real success or even interest in detecting and
handling criminals.
One cannot go so far as to say that psychiatry and
psychology knowingly create criminals or actively plan and
implant their patients to commit crimes, even though it
might look this way in some cases. Rather, these subjects
are false subjects, based on false principles which are
well suited to the demands and ambitions of their
empioyers. Their technology is incapable of detecting, much
less helping, the criminal. It is even doubtful if their
employers, the governments, would tolerate a subject which
could detect and resolve criminality-for who would be the
first ones detected? Some amongst the governments, of
course. No, the wolf would only favor a jury of wolves to
judge the crime of killing sheep. That is why you see
governments flooding out money for psychologists in schools
and psychiatrists in government departments.
With a complete, government-supported monopoly in the field
of the mind, potential criminals will go right on remaining
undetected until they injure or slaughter citizens and,
having done so, become unrelieved or even confirmed in
their habit patterns in the hands of psychiatrists and
psychologists and re-released upon the world to further
injure and slaughter citizens.
The credence and power of psychiatry and psychology are
waning. It hit its zenith about 1960; then it seemed their
word was law and that they could harm, injure and kill
patients without restraint. The appearance of an actual
technology of the mind-Dianetics and Scientology-has played
no small part in acting as a restraint.
At one time they were well on their way to turning every
baby into a future robot for the manipulation of the state
and every society into a madhouse of crime and immorality.
The world is still suffering from the effects of that
domination.
There is no real reason why, using the proper technology,
the criminal cannot be detected and also reformed. One
might also, by the use of False Data Stripping, redeem a
psychologist or psychiatrist-though this would be made
difficult by the fact that he achieves all his power and
money from the state which might have quite different
purposes for him.
The world is turning, things change. And there may come a
day when the mad dogs of the world are not given over to
the charge of mad dogs. But that.will be to the degree that
you successfully carry forward Dianetics and Scientology.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
033. HCOB 30 JUL 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JULY 1980
Remimeo
THE NATURE OF A BEING
When one is associating with or attempting to guide or
handle a person, it is necessary to know something of the
nature of a being.
If a being were a single unit, separated from all other
beings, conditions and current influences, the task of
understanding him would be relatively simple and
philosophers would have had it all worked out long before
Dianetics and Scientology.
A single-unit being responds to the most elementary and
simple rules and laws you will find in Dianetics and
Scientology: affinity, reality, communication and
understanding; the time track; mental image pictures; the
earlier incident holding the later in place; responses to
matter, energy, space, time, form, as well as force; and
the Axioms. On this you can rest assured. And one might
even wonder why we need all the additional bulletins and
cautions and provisions and lectures.
The fact of the matter is that when one addresses a person,
a human being "in the flesh," one is not addressing a
simple being.
Possibly an example will illustrate this: I had just
finished giving a congress and a staff member had made some
appointments for me to see people who wanted to talk to me.
And, in a conference room, I was suddenly confronted by a
woman who was demonstrably and actively insane. She was
incoherent; she was being "pursued"; she was utterly
agitated. Well, I was not then and never was in the
business of treating the insane. Yet here was a situation
which had to be handled if only to maintain social calm. In
those days there were many techniques for exteriorizing
people and so I used one of them, putting her back of her
head. Promptly she went sane, calmly reviewed her problem
with her husband, sensibly made up her mind what she was
going to do to properly resolve the matter, thanked me and
departed. For a brief time she had temporarily become a
single-unit being.
I have not given the example as a lesson in what to do in
such cases, for exteriorization techniques are not
reliable. But only to illustrate the complexity of people.
What you see as a human being, a person, is not a
single-unit being.
In the first place, there is the matter of valence. A
person can be himself or he can be under the belief that he
is another person or thing entirely. This removes him a
step from being a simple being.
Then there is the matter of being in a body. A body is a
very complex contrivance, quite remarkable, quite complicated.
And it is also quite subject to its own distortions.
There are also the entities (as discussed in Dianetics: The
Modern Science of Mental Health, pages 84-90, and also The
History of Man, pages 13-14, 43, 75-77).
These follow all the rules and laws and phenomena of single beings.
And then there is the matter of influences of other people
around this human being.
From a single, simple being there is a progressive
complication setting in as one adds all these other factors.
The single, simple being, without any further associations,
can be out of valence even miles away from other contacts.
It is the aggregate of all these factors which you address
when you seek to guide or handle the usual human being.
This is also why Objective Processes are so effective-they
get many of these factors all going in the same direction
for once.
None of this is to say that it is impossible to handle all
this. Far from it. But it does tell one why all the
additional precautions (like don't overrun, like careful
session procedures) are there in all those materials.
But mainly it tells you that full recoveries seldom happen
fast and that cases require an awful lot of work and often
for a very long time.
And like the woman at the congress, one sometimes gets a
sudden nearmagical result. The trouble with that one was
that she soon went back into her head and became again a
composite, even though she now did have a sane plan of
action to follow.
Results, if you follow the rules and laws carefully and
with good heart, can be obtained. And you, knowing your
business, can obtain them.
But don't become discouraged if it all doesn't happen fast
and if it takes a long time. When you are handling a human
being, you are handling a composite.
We did not construct the human mind or human body. We did
not put the
universe there to involve, oppress or complicate life. We
are working with the end product of an awful lot of trials
and tribulations.
If we were working with single beings, it would be a
nothing to do. We are not.
We are working with a complexity and we can do an awful
lot, far more than anyone could do before us. And our work
with life has effects and influences far beyond our
auditing tables. It took vast, vast numbers of years and
eons for life to get that involved and complicated. Be glad
that it doesn't take even a tiny fraction of that to dig it
out and smooth it out with Dianetics and Scientology.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
034. HCOB 2 SEP 80 REPAIR CORRECTION LIST WORDS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 SEPTEMBER 1980
Remimeo
Auditors
C/Ses
Tech/Qual
REPAIR CORRECTION LIST WORDS
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 16 Oct. 78, REPAIR CORRECTION LIST.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the list is
actually assessed on him, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING
COMMANDS.
The auditor must have received high-crime checkouts from
Qual on the above references before clearing these words on
a pc. The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing
these words on the pc.
These words need only be cleared once in the pc's auditing
if they were correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
Auditor Admin Series 6R, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE REPAIR CORRECTION LIST
A, action, an, and, anyway, asked, assessed, assessment,
attesting, audited, auditing, auditor.
Bad, be, been, being, by, bypassed, bypassed charge.
Case, charge, chart, complete, could, cycle.
Declare, did, didn't, do, done.
Ever, exterior.
Fail, false read, feel, felt, F/N, F/Ned, F/Ning, from.
Get, get on with, given, going, gone, grade, Grade Chart.
Had, handle, handled, has, have, high, high TA, how.
In, indicate, Int RD, is, it, item.
Just.
Kept, knew.
List, lists, low, low TA.
Many, messed up, misassessed, missed.
No, not.
Often, on, one, other, out-list, overrepair, overrun.
Prepared, prepared list, prepared lists, prevented.
Read, really, repair, repaired, repairs, rundown.
See, should, some, something.
TA, take up, tell, the, there, think, time, to, told, too, TRs.
Unnecessary, up.
Want, was, wasn't, were, what, when, while, win, with,
would, wrong.
You, your.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Mission Issues Revision
==================
035. HCOB 11 SEP 80 L4BRB WORD LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1980
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
L4BRB WORD LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 15 Dec. 68RB, L4BRB FOR ASSESSMENT
OF ALL LISTING ERRORS.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the L4BRB is
actually assessed, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS.
The auditor must have received high-crime checkouts from
Qual on the above references before clearing these words on
a pc. The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing
these words on the pc.
This word list need only be cleared once in the pc ' s
auditing if it was correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
HCOB 30 Oct. 77, Auditor Admin Series 6RA, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE L4BRB
A, abandoned, accepted, acknowledge, action, already,
amazed, an, and, another, answer, ARC break, ashamed,
asserted, auditor.
Because, been, before, being, by, bypassed, bypassed charge.
Carried, carried on, cause, charge, correct, correction, couldn't.
Denied, did, didn't, different, do, done.
Earlier, else, else's, errors, evaluated, exterior.
Fail, first, forced, found, from.
Given, gone.
Had, handled, has, have.
In, incomplete, interest, invalidated, is, it, item, items.
Kind.
List, listed, listing, long.
Made, meaningless, missed.
No, not, nothing, nulling.
Of, off, on, only, or, other, out, overrun, overt.
Past, place, in the first place, point, previously,
process, protest, protested, PTP, pushed, put.
Question.
React, release, restimulated, right.
Said, session, some, somebody, someone, suggest, suggested.
Taken, that, the, there, this, thought, to, too.
Under, understand, understood, unnecessary, upset.
Volunteered.
Want, was, way, were, what, when, while, withheld,
withhold, word, wrong.
You, your, yours, yourself.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Mission Issues Revision
==================
036. HCOB 16 SEP 80R r. 4 Jul 88 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST WORD LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1980R
REVISED 4 JULY 1988
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
PTS RD CORRECTION LIST
WORD LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 16 Apr. 72R, PTS RUNDOWN
CORRECTION LIST.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the list is
actually assessed on him, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING
COMMANDS.
The staff auditor or intern must have received high-crime
checkouts from Qual on the above references before clearing
these words in session on an org pc. (Ref: HCO PL 8 Mar.
66, KSW Series 13, HIGH CRIME)
The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing these words.
This word list need only be cleared once in the pc's
auditing if correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
HCOB 30 Oct. 87, Auditor Admin Series 6RA, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE PTS RD CORRECTION LIST
A, about, achieved, additional, after, agree, all, all
right, an, and, another, anyway, are, attest, audited,
auditing, auditor.
Bad, be, been, believe, but, by.
Can't, caused, communication, complete, completely, condition.
Decided, detected, didn't, disagrees, disclosed, does,
doing, don't.
Earlier, else, engram, errors, ever, everything, exterior.
Feel, feelings, first.
Gains, given, group.
Handle, handled, has, have, hold.
Ill, in, incomplete, Int Rundown, is, it.
Know.
Lies, like, list, lost.
Messed up, middle, misunderstood, more.
Not, now.
Of, okay, on, only, onto, or.
People, person, physically, place, protested, PTS, PTS Rundown.
Really, rundown.
Said, Scientology, situation, someone, something, still,
suppressive.
Than, that, the, there, this, to, told.
Understand, upset.
Want, was, wasn't, went, were, weren't, what, when, who,
whole, with, words, wrong.
You, your.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
037. HCOB 17 SEP 80R r. 8 Apr 88 L3RH WORD LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1980R
Issue I
REVISED 8 APRIL 1988
Remimeo
NED Auditors
C/Ses
New Era Dianetics Series 20-1
L3RH WORD LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 11 Apr. 71RE, NED Series 20, L3RH,
DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the L3RH is
assessed, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS.
The auditor must have received high-crime checkouts from
Qual on the above references before clearing these words on
a pc. The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing
these words on the pc.
This word list need only be cleared once in the pc's
auditing if it was correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted on the Yellow Sheet in the pc's folder. (Ref: HCOB 30
Oct. 87, Auditor Admin Series 6RA, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE L3RH
A, abandoned, accept, alcohol, all, already, an, and,
another, ARC break, assessed, at, attain, audited, auditor.
Basic, be, because, been, beginning, black, by, bypassed.
Chain, chains, changed, changing, charge, charged, Clear,
cognition, command, commands, completed, confused,
constantly, could.
Date, death, declare, demand, Dianetic, did, different,
distracted, drugs, duration, durations.
Earlier, else, engrams, erased, erasing, expressed, exterior.
False, first, flows, flubbed, F/N, for, found, from.
Get, giving, go, gone, goof, gotten.
Handled, has, have, heavily, held up.
Implant, in, incident, incidents, incorrect, indicated,
Int, interest, interrupted, invalidated, invisible, it, item.
Jump, just.
Late, left, let, list.
Mass, medicine, messed up, misrun, missed, misunderstood,
misworded, more.
No, nobody, not, nothing.
Of, on, one, or, original, originally, over.
Past, persistent, picture, pictures, place, postulate,
preassessment, pressure, prevented, problem, protesting.
Read, real, really, reason, refuse, resent, restimulated,
run, rundown, running.
Said, same, say, saying, see, sequence, should, similar,
simply, skipped, solid, some, something, soon, state,
still, stop, stopped, stuck, suppressed.
Than, that, the, there, thing, this, through, time, tired,
to, too, trouble, twice, two.
Unnecessary, upset.
Was, went, were, what, when, while, with, withhold,
wording, would, wrong.
You, your.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
038. HCOB 17 SEP 80RA r. 28 Jun 90 GREEN FORM WORD LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1980RA
Issue II
REVISED 28 JUNE 1990
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
GREEN FORM WORD LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
HCO PL 7 Apr. 70RE GREEN FORM Rev. 27.6.88
These are the words from HCO PL 7 Apr. 70RE, GREEN FORM.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the Green
Form is actually assessed, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING
COMMANDS.
The auditor must have received high-crime checkouts from
Qual on the above references before clearing these words on
a pc. The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing
these words on the pc. (Ref: HCO PL 8 Mar. 66, KSW Series
13, HIGH CRIME)
This word list need only be cleared once in.the pc's
auditing if it was correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
HCOB 30 Oct. 87, Auditor Admin Series 6RA, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE GREEN FORM
A, about, against, alcohol, altering, an, any, anything,
ARC break, are, arrested, aspirin, audited, auditing, auditor.
Bad, be, because, been, breaks, by, bypassed, bypassed charge.
Can't, Clear, code, coming, comm cycle, committed,
confidential, connected, copies, could, crime, crimes,
criminal, cured.
Dangers, data, debts, demanded, Dianetic Clear, do, doing,
drugs, drunk.
Else, engram, enough, environment, environmental, erased,
error, evaluated, exactly, experimenting, exterior.
Food, for, from.
Get, gone, group.
Had, handled, handwritten, happen, has, hasn't, have, here,
hidden standard, hungry.
If, ignored, in, Int Rundown, invalidated, is, it.
Kept, know, knowledge.
Left, list.
Matching, materials, menace, mentioned, messed up, missed.
Nonstandard, not.
Of, or, orgs, originations, overrepaired, overrun, overt.
Person, physically, picture, present time problem, process, PT.
Record, release, restimulation, review, rushed.
Scientology, self-auditing, sleep, solve, someone,
something, study, sufficient, suppressed, suppressive.
Taken, taped, tech, that, the, there, this, tired, to,
tranquilizers, trying, typed.
Unflat, unnecessary, unpaid, up, upsetting.
Was, what, which, with, withhold, worked, works, would, wrong.
You, your.
ADDITIONAL WORDS FROM RESISTIVE CASES PREASSESSMENT
After, and, antagonistic, attained, attested.
Before, being.
Committing, continuously.
Doesn't, don't.
Earlier, engrams, evil purpose.
Former. Grades.
Ill.
Misunderstoods.
Never.
On, out, overts, overwhelmed.
Part, practices, pretending, prior.
Rudiments, run.
Same, secrets, seeking, seriously.
Therapy, thrill, training.
Valence. Want, went.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
039. HCOB 28 SEP 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE WORDS LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1980R
Issue III
REVISED 26 JULY 1986
Remimeo
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE
WORDS LIST
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Apr. 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH Rev. 21.6.75
HCOB 8 July 74R I Word Clearing Series 53R Rev. 24.7.74 CLEAR TO F/N
HCOB 21 June 72 I Word Clearing Series 38 METHOD 5
HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 17 July 79 I Word Clearing Series 64 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED
These are the words from HCOB 23 July 80R, CONFESSIONAL REPAIR
LIST-LCRE.
These words should be cleared on the pc before the list is
actually assessed on him, per HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING
COMMANDS.
The staff auditor or intern must have received high-crime
checkouts from Qual on the above references before clearing
these words on an org pc. (Ref: HCO PL 8 Mar. 66, KSW
Series 13, HIGH CRIME)
The auditor uses Method 5 Word Clearing when clearing these
words on the pc.
This word list need only be cleared once in the pc's
auditing if it was correctly cleared the first time.
The fact of having cleared this word list on the pc must be
noted in the appropriate place in the pc's folder. (Ref:
Auditor Admin Series 6R, THE YELLOW SHEET)
WORDS FROM THE CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE
A, about, accepted, accusation, acknowledge, afraid,
alcohol, all, an, and, angry, answer, any, anything, ARC
break, are, area, at, auditor, Auditor's Code, avoid.
Back, bad, basic, be, been, being, betrayal, breaks, but, by.
Call, chain, coming, coming up, computation, consideration,
cover up, covered up, crime.
Dare, deliberately, demand, did, didn't, different,
discovered, don't, drugs.
Earlier, else, error, ethics, evaluation, evil, evil
impulse, evil purpose.
F/N, F/Ning, fail, false, falsely, falsified, fear, feel,
find out, for.
Get, getting, giving.
Had, half-truth, handled, happen, has, have, he, hear,
hidden, honest, hungry.
Impulse, infer, injustice, intention, into, invalidate,
invalidated, it, item.
Jumped, justified.
Kept, known.
Late, left, lessen, lie, list.
Make, medicine, mention, might, misdirect, missed,
misunderstood, more.
Nonsurvival, not.
Of, off, on, once, one, opinions, or, other, others,
out-ethics, out-Int, overrun, overt, overts.
Part, pretending, problem, protested, PTS, punish.
Question.
Read, recently, reputation, responsibility, rest, revealed, right.
Said, same, say, saying, Sec Check, sec checked, seem,
should, situation, some, someone, something, specifically,
suppressed.
Taken, taking, tell, telling, than, that, the, there,
tired, to, told, too, trouble, try.
Undisclosed, unflat, upset, used.
Vilifying.
Waiting, was, wasn't, way, were, what, when, with,
withhold, withholding, worded, worried, wrong.
You, your, yourself.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
040. HCOB 6 OCT 80 GENERAL STAFF CONFESSIONAL LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1980
Issue I
Remimeo
HCO
Tech/Qual
Confessional Form 2R
GENERAL STAFF CONFESSIONAL LIST
Ref:
HCOB 30 Nov. 78 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE
Anyone doing a Confessional must have done or be on a
Confessional course or internship.
The procedure for doing a Confessional is contained in HCOB
30 Nov. 78, CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE.
When applying Confessional tech correctly, you are helping
the individual to face up to his responsibilities in his
group and the society and putting him back into
communication with his fellow man, his family and the world
at large.
AUDITOR:____________ PRECLEAR:_______________
ORG:________________ DATE:____________________
1 . HAVE YOU EVER STOLEN ANYTHING FROM A SCIENTOLOGY
ORGANIZATION? ________
2. ARE YOU HERE ONLY TO GET FREE PROCESSING? ________
3. DO YOU INTEND TO LEAVE THIS ORGANIZATION ONCE TRAINED? ________
4. HAVE YOU AUDITED OUTSIDE PCs FOR MONEY WHILE A MEMBER
OF THIS ORG? ________
5 . HAVE YOU EVER FED AN ORG PC TO AN OUTSIDE AUDITOR? ________
6 . HAVE YOU EVER BROKEN A CONTRACT WITH AN ORG? ________
7 . HAVE YOU EVER SHIFTED THE BLAME TO AN INNOCENT
STAFF MEMBER? ________
8. AS A STAFF MEMBER, HAVE YOU FAILED TO KEEP THE ORG
SCHEDULE? ________
9. HAVE YOU OFFERED OR DELIVERED FREE SERVICES? ________
10. HAVE YOU ACCEPTED SERVICES FROM AN ORGANIZATION
WITHOUT BEING INVOICED? ________
11. HAVE YOU EVER ADVISED ANYONE AGAINST JOINING STAFF
OF A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION OR THE SEA ORG? ________
12. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN SCIENTOLOGY MATERIALS TO A GROUP
OPPOSED TO SCIENTOLOGY? ________
13. HAVE YOU EVER SAID DISCREDITABLE THINGS TO THE PRESS OR
PUBLIC CONCERNING SCIENTOLOGY? ________
14. AS A STAFF MEMBER HAVE YOU FAILED TO REGULARLY ATTEND
STAFF STUDY OR TAKE YOUR ENHANCEMENT TIME? ________
15. HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH LEGAL ORDERS
FROM A SENIOR? ________
16 . HAVE YOU EVER FALSE REPORTED AS A STAFF MEMBER? ________
17. HAVE YOU FALSIFIED A STATISTIC? ________
18. HAVE YOU EVER FOLLOWED AN ORDER YOU KNEW TO BE
OFF-POLICY? ________
19. HAVE YOU GIVEN FALSE EVIDENCE TO AN ETHICS BODY? ________
20. HAVE YOU EVER OBSTRUCTED AN ETHICS INVESTIGATION? ________
21. HAVE YOU WITHHELD DATA TO PROTECT YOURSELF OR ANOTHER? ________
22. HAVE YOU EVER THIRD-PARTIED A STAFF MEMBER? ________
23. HAVE YOU EVER LIED TO A STAFF MEMBER? ________
24. HAVE YOU FEIGNED ILLNESS TO AVOID WORK? ________
25. HAVE YOU FAILED TO PAY BACK LOANS YOU ACTUALLY OWE? ________
26 . HAVE YOU CAUSED UPSET TO A PUBLIC PC OR STUDENT? ________
27. AS A STAFF MEMBER, HAVE YOU COMMITTED A PROBLEM? ________
28. AS A STAFF MEMBER, HAVE YOU EVER DEVISED A SOLUTION
WHICH THEN BECAME A PROBLEM? ________
29. HAVE YOU EVER HAD CASE ON POST? ________
30. HAVE YOU PREVENTED A FELLOW STAFF MEMBER FROM WEARING
HIS HAT? ________
31. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING TO GET ANOTHER REMOVED FROM POST
FOR YOUR OWN PERSONAL GAIN? ________
32. HAVE YOU EVER ENGAGED IN A POWER PUSH AGAINST A SENIOR
EXECUTIVE? ________
33. HAVE YOU EVER USED A SCIENTOLOGY POSITION TO OBTAIN
UNUSUAL FAVORS? ________
34. HAVE YOU EVER PERSONALLY ACCEPTED A COMMISSION, PERCENTAGE,
BRIBE OR GIFT FOR GIVING ANY FIRM OR PERSON THIS
ORGANIZATION'S BUSINESS? ________
35. HAVE YOU ENGAGED IN ANY SORT OF 2D ACTIVITIES WITH
PUBLIC STUDENTS OR PCs? ________
36. HAVE YOU LIVED OR SLEPT WITH ANYONE OTHER THAN YOUR
LEGAL SPOUSE? ________
37. HAVE YOU CREATED A NEW 2D RELATIONSHIP WHILE LEGALLY
MARRIED TO ANOTHER PERSON? ________
38. HAVE YOU EVER ADVISED ANYONE AGAINST FOLLOWING POLICY? ________
39. HAVE YOU PREVENTED ANOTHER FROM LEARNING HIS POST? ________
40. HAVE YOU PREVENTED ANOTHER FROM STUDYING OR TRAINING? ________
41. HAVE YOU EVER SLOWED THINGS DOWN JUST BECAUSE YOUR SENIORS
WANTED THEM SPEEDED UP? ________
42. DO YOU EVER PRIVATELY LAUGH AT THE ANTICS OF YOUR
SUPERIORS? ________
43. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING TO GET ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER IN
BAD REPUTE? ________
44. HAVE YOU EVER DAMAGED ORG PROPERTY? ________
45. HAVE YOU WASTED ORG SUPPLIES? ________
46. HAVE YOU JUGGLED ORG ACCOUNTS? ________
47. AS A STAFF MEMBER HAVE YOU PRODUCED ANY OVERT PRODUCTS? ________
48. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN OUT DATA WHICH WAS CONTRARY TO HCO
BULLETINS OR POLICY LETTERS? ________
49. HAVE YOU EVER PRETENDED TO QUOTE HCOBs OR PLs WITHOUT
SHOWING THE ACTUAL ISSUE? ________
50. HAVE YOU EVER PREVENTED TECH OR POLICY FROM BEING KNOWN
OR CORRECTLY USED? ________
51. HAVE YOU EVER JUST PRETENDED TO WORK? ________
52. HAVE YOU TAKEN CREDIT FOR THE WORK DONE BY ANOTHER? ________
53. HAVE YOU MALIGNED ANOTHER TO ENHANCE YOUR OWN REPUTATION? ________
54. HAVE YOU CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO AN ORG MUTINY? ________
55. HAVE YOU SPENT POST TIME ON MATTERS NOT RELATED TO YOUR
POST OR ORG BUSINESS? ________
56. HAVE YOU ENCOURAGED ANOTHER TO BLOW? ________
57. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING TO DAMAGE THE REPUTE OF A SENIOR
SCIENTOLOGY ORG? ________
58. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING TO DAMAGE THE REPUTE OF THE SEA ORG? ________
59. HAVE YOU DISCOURAGED ORG PCs OR STUDENTS FROM ADVANCING TO
A SENIOR ORG? ________
60. HAVE YOU EVER LIED TO A PUBLIC PC OR STUDENT? ________
61 . HAVE YOU EVER LIED TO A POTENTIAL PC OR STUDENT? ________
62. HAVE YOU EVER WITHHELD THAT YOU HAD A PTS A SITUATION WITH
A PARENT OR RELATIVE? ________
63 . HAVE YOU FALSELY REPORTED TO A SEA ORG MISSIONAIRE? ________
64. HAVE YOU EVER FALSE REPORTED TO FLAG? ________
65. HAVE YOU EVER REPORTED COMPLIANCE TO AN ORDER OR TARGET
WHICH WAS NOT FULLY DONE? ________
66. HAVE YOU KNOWINGLY VIOLATED POLICY? ________
67. HAVE YOU BLAMED ANOTHER FOR NOT DOING YOUR JOB? ________
68. DO YOU THINK IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER YOU DO A
GOOD JOB OR NOT? ________
69. AS A STAFF MEMBER, HAVE YOU EVER TAKEN BOOKS, PACKS, PENS,
SMALL AMOUNTS OF MONEY OR OTHER ARTICLES WHICH DID NOT BELONG
TO YOU? ________
70. ARE YOU HERE PURPOSELY TO UPSET OR DAMAGE SCIENTOLOGY? ________
71. WHILE ON STAFF OF A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION, HAVE YOU
COMMITTED ANY CIVIL CRIME? ________
72. IS THERE SOMETHING AN ETHICS OFFICER SHOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT
YOU? ________
73. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING YOU WOULDN'T LIKE LRH TO KNOW
ABOUT? ________
74. AS A STAFF MEMBER HAVE YOU COMMITTED SOME OVERT THAT HASN'T
BEEN REVEALED? ________
75. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALFTRUTH? ________
76. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH? ________
77. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? ________
78. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD ALL? ________
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Mission Issues Revision
==================
041. HCOB 6 OCT 80 SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1980
Issue II
Remimeo
HCO
Tech/Qual
Confessional Form 4R
SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL LIST
Ref:
HCOB 30 Nov. 78 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE
Anyone doing a Confessional must have done or be on a
Confessional course or internship.
The procedure for doing a Confessional is contained in HCOB
30 Nov. 78, CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE.
When applying Confessional tech correctly, you are helping
the individual to face up to his responsibilities in his
group and the society and putting him back into
communication with his fellow man, his family and the world
at large.
AUDITOR:_________ PRECLEAR:_______________
ORG:_____________ DATE:____________________
1. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN A STUDENT VERBAL DATA? ________
2. HAVE YOU TAUGHT A COURSE WITHOUT A CHECKSHEET? ________
3. HAVE YOU GIVEN STUDENTS CHECKSHEETS OTHER THAN THOSE
OFFICIALLY APPROVED? ________
4. HAVE YOU DELETED MATERIALS FROM AN APPROVED CHECKSHEET? ________
5. HAVE YOU FAILED TO PROVIDE COURSE MATERIALS? ________
6. HAVE YOU FAILED TO UPDATE AND CORRECT CHECKSHEETS BEFORE
ISSUING TO NEW STUDENTS? ________
7. HAVE YOU PERMITTED A STUDENT TO FALSELY ATTEST? ________
8. HAVE YOU ATTESTED TO A STUDENT'S COURSE COMPLETION WITHOUT
VERIFYING HIS ABILITY TO APPLY THE MATERIALS? ________
9. HAVE YOU EVER PERMITTED A STUDENT TO BLOW? ________
10. HAVE YOU FAILED TO REMAIN IN GOOD ARC WITH YOUR STUDENTS? ________
11. HAVE YOU EVER ADVISED ANYONE NOT TO TAKE SERVICES AT A
SCIENTOLOGY ORG? ________
12. HAVE YOU BLAMED OTHERS FOR POOR COURSE ATTENDANCE? ________
13. HAVE YOU EVER BECOME EMOTIONALLY OR SEXUALLY INVOLVED
WITH A STUDENT? ________
14. HAVE YOU FALSIFIED STATISTICS? ________
15. HAVE YOU EVER GOTTEN ANGRY WITH A STUDENT? ________
16. HAVE YOU EVER INTERRUPTED A STUDENT WHO WAS DOING WELL? ________
17. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO HANDLE A BOGGED STUDENT? ________
18. HAVE YOU EVER MADE A STUDENT REDO CHECKOUTS, DRILLS OR
PRACTICALS TO BOOST STATS? ________
19. HAVE YOU EVER LIED TO, DECEIVED OR MISDIRECTED A STUDENT
CONCERNING SCIENTOLOGY? ________
20. HAVE YOU EVER LIED TO A STUDENT? ________
21. AS A SUPERVISOR, HAVE YOU EVER LEFT A COURSE UNATTENDED? ________
22. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO REFER A STUDENT TO THE MATERIALS? ________
23. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO KEEP A COURSE EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE? ________
24. HAVE YOU FAILED TO APPLY WORD CLEARING TECH? ________
25. WHEN WORD CLEARING STUDENTS, HAVE YOU IGNORED READS? ________
26. HAVE YOU PRETENDED YOU CAN READ A METER? ________
27. HAVE YOU GRADUATED SOMEONE YOU HAD MISGIVINGS ABOUT? ________
28. HAVE YOU EVER USED SUPERVISOR STATUS TO OBTAIN UNUSUAL
FAVORS? ________
29. HAVE YOU PASSED A STUDENT JUST TO BE KIND? ________
30. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN A CHECKOUT ON MATERIALS YOU WERE
UNCERTAIN OF? ________
31. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO CORRECT A STUDENT'S MISTAKES? ________
32. HAVE YOU EVER BECOME COMPLACENT ABOUT THE EXISTING SCENE IN
YOUR COURSE ROOM? ________
33. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING YOU WOULDN'T LIKE YOUR STUDENTS
TO KNOW ABOUT? ________
34. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO APPLY STUDY TECH? ________
35 . ARE YOU PRETENDING THAT YOU KNOW STUDY TECH? ________
36. HAVE YOU DONE ADMIN OR OTHER DUTIES DURING COURSE TIME? ________
37. HAVE YOU EVER PERMITTED ANYONE TO COME INTO THE COURSE ROOM
AND BOTHER STUDENTS FOR ANY REASON? ________
38. HAVE YOU EVER PERMITTED A STUDENT TO ENTURBULATE A CLASS? ________
39. HAVE YOU EVER OFFLOADED STUDENTS INSTEAD OF HANDLING THEM? ________
40. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO RECOVER A BLOWN STUDENT? ________
41. HAVE YOU EVER USED YOUR POSITION AS A SUPERVISOR TO PROCURE
STUDENTS FOR ANOTHER GROUP? ________
42. HAVE YOU EVER DISCUSSED OR TALKED ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL PROBLEMS
OR CASE TO A STUDENT? ________
43. HAVE YOU EVER SUBJECTED A STUDENT TO RIDICULE? ________
44. HAVE YOU C/Sed STUDENT SESSIONS WHEN NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO? ________
45. HAVE YOU EVER FLUNKED A STUDENT WHO REALLY KNEW THE DATA? ________
46. IS THERE SOMETHING A STUDENT MIGHT FIND OUT ABOUT YOU? ________
47. HAVE YOU EVER NEGLECTED TO GIVE PRAISE TO A STUDENT WHEN DUE? ________
48. HAVE YOU EVER RUN A SLOW COURSE? ________
49. HAVE YOU BLAMED OTHERS FOR POOR COURSE ENROLLMENTS? ________
50. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO SPOT A STUDENT'S DOPE-OFF, GLEE OR OTHER
MANIFESTATION OF MISUNDERSTOODS AND GET THEM CLEANED UP? ________
51. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO USE SUPERVISOR TWO WAY COMM WHEN
NEEDED? ________
52. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO APPLY ETHICS TECH WHEN NEEDED? ________
53. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED A STUDENT RATHER THAN HIS MISTAKE? ________
54. HAVE YOU EVER ALLOWED QUICKIED DRILLING ON CHECKSHEET DRILLS? ________
55. HAVE YOU CLAIMED FALSE BONUSES? ________
56. HAVE YOU NOT STUDIED YOUR HAT? ________
57 . HAVE YOU PRETENDED QUALIFICATIONS NOT ATTAINED? ________
58. HAVE YOU PERSONALLY STUDIED PAST MISUNDERSTOODS? ________
59. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED STUDY TECH? ________
60 . HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED SCIENTOLOGY MATERIALS? ________
61. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO MUSTER YOUR STUDENTS PRECISELY ON TIME,
NOTE ABSENCES AND TAKE ACTION? ________
62. AS A SUPERVISOR, HAVE YOU PERMITTED STUDENTS TO GOOF OFF DURING
COURSE HOURS? ________
63. HAVE YOU PERMITTED STUDENTS TO EAT OR SMOKE IN THE COURSE
ROOM? ________
64. AS A SUPERVISOR HAVE YOU EVER STOOD AROUND OR SAT AT YOUR DESK
NOT ACTIVELY HANDLING STUDENTS? ________
65. HAVE YOU FAILED TO GET STUDENTS THROUGH THEIR COURSE AND
GRADUATED? ________
66. AS A SUPERVISOR HAVE YOU PRODUCED ANY OVERT PRODUCTS? ________
67. HAVE YOU EVER CONDONED OUT-TECH? ________
68. AS A SUPERVISOR HAVE YOU EVER DONE ANYTHING YOU WOULDN'T WANT
LRH TO KNOW ABOUT? ________
69. CONCERNING STUDY OR SUPERVISION, HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERT
THAT HASN'T BEEN REVEALED? ________
70. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALFTRUTH? ________
71. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH? ________
72. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? ________
73. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD ALL? ________
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Mission Issues Revision
==================