No matching fragments found in this document.
Date: 21 Aug 1999 12:55:26 -0000
Subject: FZ Bible NEW TECH VOL XII 07/17 (1980-4)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <b8b5b51be4b3541a3458f464cd589d56@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 2346
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!newsfeed1.news.nl.uu.net!sun4nl!EU.net!newsfeed.Austria.EU.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:901041 alt.clearing.technology:97347
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
NEW TECH VOL XII 07/17 (1980-4)
**************************************************
NEW TECH VOLUME XII 1980-84
(As issued in 1991 by CofS)
==================
[Because of its large size, the complete contents only appears
in part 0 and part 1.]
CONTENTS:
Part 7
053. HCOB 19 DEC 80R r. 16 Nov 87 REHAB TECH
054. HCOB 21 DEC 80RA r. 23 Apr 91 THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN
055. HCOB 23 DEC 80R r. 12 Jul 88 EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST
056. Attachment EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
==================
053. HCOB 19 DEC 80R r. 16 Nov 87 REHAB TECH
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 DECEMBER 1980R
REVISED 16 NOVEMBER 1987
Remimeo
Tech/Qual
Academies
Class III
Auditors
and above
REHAB TECH
Refs:
HCOB 30 June 65 RELEASE, REHABILITATION OF, FORMER RELEASES
AND THETAN EXTERIORS
HCOB 21 July 65 RELEASE REHABILITATION
HCOB 2 Aug. 65 RELEASE GOOFS
HCOB 11 Feb. 66R FREE NEEDLES, HOW TO GET THEM ON A PC Rev. 22.2.79
HCOB 26 Aug. 68 REHAB AND CORRECTION
HCOB 5 Dec. 71 END PHENOMENAS
HCOB 15 Nov. 78 DATING AND LOCATING
E-Meter Instruction Film 4, "How the E-Meter Works"
This bulletin is a condensation of the tech I first
developed in 1965 on the subject of rehabs and release.
While there is considerably more data on these subjects in
the Technical Volumes and on the Class VIII tapes, this
issue sets forth the key data and presents the methods for
rehabbing in one consolidated issue for the first time.
DEFINITIONS:
"Rehab" is a shortened version of "rehabilitate," which
means: to restore to a former capacity or condition.
"Release" is the term for what occurs when a person
separates from his reactive mind or some part of it or when
he separates from some mass.
In Scientology we use the term "rehabilitate" most commonly
to mean: restoring a state of release previously attained
by the pc.
RELEASES
Scientology processes can be categorized as follows:
1. Those processes which direct the preclear' s attention
to the mental masses in his reactive mind in order to
enable him to separate out from them.
2. Those processes which are aimed at increasing the
preclear's abilities.
Both types of processes lead to release.
Both types of processes are necessary to bring a person up
the levels of awareness and up each step of the Grade Chart
to OT.
When you take a thetan out of a mass, that's a release.
When you erase the mass and leave the thetan there, that's
an erasure. Erasure is a different phenomenon from release.
In auditing, when the pc spots something in the bank he
disconnects from the bank to a greater or lesser degree.
That is a release. Or when the pc becomes free of a
difficulty or personal "block" or inability stemming from
the mind, that is a release.
A person can and does go release many times in the course
of his auditing. He may go release many times while being
run on the processes of a grade before he attains the
ability of that grade.
The Grades Releases are covered fully in HCOB 22 Sept. 65, RELEASE
GRADATION, NEW LEVELS OF RELEASE, in HCOB 27 Sept. 65, RELEASE
GRADATION, ADDITIONAL DATA, and on the Grade Chart itself.
Further data can be found in HCOB/HCO PL 23 Oct. 80R II, CHART
OF ABILITIES GAINED FOR LOWER LEVELS AND EXPANDED LOWER GRADES.
Oddly enough, the idea of release can translate through to
the pc to include releases in life too. For example, a
person was in prison and then was let out. This might well
read as a release if he was asked about former releases,
and it would be okay. One sees how this can be in view of
the basic concept of release, e.g., when you take a person
out of a mass-any mass-that is a release.
So "release" points in life such as the above are valid
and, though one doesn't ask for them specifically, should
they come up during a former release Rehab on a pc, they
are to be handled.
However, the auditor must understand that such a release in
no way means that a person is a release on a process or on
one of the grades! Prison might be a problem to someone but
getting out doesn't make him a Problems Release! Don't
misconstrue one for the other and declare someone a Grades
Release at some level because he had a release in life.
Actually, one can go release on any subject and
theoretically one could rehab any release a pc had. The
exact subjects a pc must be released on in order to make it
up the Bridge are those listed on the Grade Chart.
OVERRUN
Overrun occurs when the thetan considers that something has
gone on too long or happened too often.
When the person begins to feel this way about something, he
begins to protest it and try to stop it. This tends to make
things more solid and builds up mass in the mind. People
who are very intent on stopping things in life appear solid
and massy.
In auditing, an overrun means the preclear came out of the
bank and then went back into it again. For instance, the pc
released on the process "From where could you communicate
to your dog?" but the auditor continued the process after
he should have indicated the F/N and gone on to something
else. By continuing, the auditor throws the pc back into
the bank again and wrecks the release state.
An overrun in auditing can also mean that the pc gained an
ability to do something and the auditor continued the
process or grade past the point where the ability had been
regained. By pushing on, the ability can get invalidated.
In both cases the person's attention goes back onto his
case and hangs up. The person can feel the mass of it again.
In life when something is overrun, the person begins to
accumulate protests and upsets about the thing or activity
he feels overrun on. His attention tends to stick on it.
This also builds up mass.
An overrun, whether it occurred in auditing or in life, is
handled in auditing using the tech of rehabbing.
THEORY OF REHABBING
The theory of rehabs is based on the following stable
datum: This particular universe is built by twos. One
cannot know a datum unless there is another datum to
compare it to. This fact can also be seen to operate in the
field of the mind. (Ref: Logic 8, Scientology 0-8: The Book
of Basics)
Thus, in rehabbing a release point one is getting the pc to
view one datum (a time of release from a mass) as compared
to another datum (a time he was stuck in the mass) and when
this is done the pc moves out of the mass once again. That
is the simplicity of what occurs.
To expand on the mechanics involved, it can be described as
follows:
When a person has been overrun, he is trying to stop the
mass or thing he has gone back into. The other side to that
is the time or times he was released from it.
These are opposites: the "plus" of the mass and the "minus"
of the time the mass wasn't there. This idea of opposites
tends to hang things up.
The idea then behind handling an overrun is to unstabilize
this plus-minus pair by getting the pc to clearly spot the
"minus" side of it. When this happens, the "plus" side goes.
When the pc's attention is directed to the points when he
was released from the mass, he ceases to try and stop the
mass and it goes. The release state then rehabilitates.
So the mechanism being worked with here is that the mass
connected with an overrun can be knocked out by spotting
the release connected with it. It is a very simple
principle which has important uses in auditing.
TYPES OF REHABS
There are three types of rehab procedures for use in
rehabbing releases.
The earliest is Rehab 1965 Style. This is followed by Rehab
by Counting which I developed in 1968. Later on, in 1971, I
developed the Date/Locate procedure.
Each of the three has its uses depending on what it is one
is trying to rehab.
One does a Rehab 65 Style when one is rehabbing a specific
point, such as the point a specific former release was
attained.
A Rehab by Counting is done when, for instance, a process
appears overrun in session or when one is rehabbing
"releases" such as on drugs on the Scientology Drug
Rundown, or at any time something is likely to have a
number of releases connected with it.
A Date/Locate is used when one wants to directly spot the
exact time and location of a specific incident and thus
blow the mass connected with it. (Date/ Locate is used on
the last step of the Clear Certainty Rundown to determine
the exact point a person went Clear. The Date/Locate
procedure has many other uses in other types of auditing as
well, but in rehabbing its most frequent use is on the
Clear Certainty Rundown, per the above.)
INDOCTRINATING THE PC
The procedure for doing a rehab is quite simple when one
understands the theory of it and makes sure the pc does too.
Before doing any rehab or Date/Locate, clear the terms and
procedure with the pc so that he understands. Use the data
in this issue to clear the theory of release and rehabs,
and to clear the procedure to be used-Rehab 65 Style or
Rehab by Counting.
Use data in HCOB 15 Nov. 78, DATING AND LOCATING, in
indoctrinating the pc to the Date/Locate theory and
procedure. All the terms and steps of the procedure are
covered in that issue.
The better the pc understands what is going on the smoother
it will go. Do not skimp this indoctrination step. Any
auditing efforts can go up in smoke if one tries to audit
the pc over misunderstoods.
1 . Clear the terms below with the pc, using demos and
consulting the pc's understanding.
A.. RELEASE: (1) A person who has been able to back out of
his bank. The bank is still there but the person isn't sunk
into it with all its somatics and depressions. (2) When the
pc disconnects from the mass in his bank, that is a
Release. When this happens, the pc disconnects from the
bank to a greater or lesser degree. (3) A person who has become
free of a difficulty or personal "block" stemming from the mind.
(4) When you take a thetan out of a mass, that is a Release.
B. REHABILITATE: to restore to a former capacity or
condition. In auditing, this means to do the series of
actions in session which result in regaining a state of
release for the pc. Abbreviated "Rehab."
C. KEY-IN: the action of some part of the reactive mind
moving in on the person. A key-in occurs when the
environment around the awake but fatigued or distressed
individual is similar to some part of the reactive mind.
Since the reactive mind operates on the equation A=A=A, the
present time environment becomes identified with the contents
of a particular portion of the bank and so it activates and
exerts its influence on the person.
D. KEY-OUT: the action of the reactive mind or some portion
of it dropping out of restimulation on the pc.
E. GRADE: a series of processes culminating in an exact
ability attained, examined and attested to by the pc. (See
the Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart for the
complete explanation of the different grades.)
Auditing processes result in a release. The auditing
processes of a grade, when done, result in the pc attaining
the specific ability of that grade.
2. Clear "overrun" with the pc, using the section "Overrun"
in this issue. Have the pc demo an overrun in auditing and
in life.
3. Clear with the pc the stable datum on which rehabbing is
based (under "Theory of Rehabbing" in this issue). Have him
demo it (using a demo kit) as needed to ensure he's got it.
4. Using a demo kit, clear with the pc the simple mechanics
of rehabbing (spotting the release connected with a mass).
Ref: Section on "Theory of Rehabbing" in this issue.
5. Go over with the pc each step of the procedure to be
used (Rehab 65 Style or Rehab by Counting or Date/Locate,
if needed). Clear any words regarding these procedures,
which have not previously been cleared in the pc's
auditing. Use a demo kit as needed.
6. Cover meter dating with the pc so he understands its
purpose and how it is done.
Use E-Meter Drill 22 to explain it. Ensure the pc
understands you don't want him dependent on the meter but
that you will help him, using the meter, if necessary.
(Ref: HCOB 4 Aug. 63, E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION
CYCLE ERROR)
Be sure the pc understands the simple basics of rehabbing
with no questions or confusions or misunderstood terms,
before you begin any rehab.
Additionally, when doing any type of rehab session it is
important to ensure the pc's ruds are in before starting.
REHAB PROCEDURES
PROCEDURE FOR REHAB 65 STYLE
I. Determine what is going to be rehabbed. This might be a
release on a process, some other type of former release, or
the ability of a grade attained by the pc.
A. For a process, use the question:
"Were you released on (process)?"
a. Clear the question on the pc first, omitting the name of
the actual process.
b. Then check the question (including the name of the
actual process) on the meter.
c. If no read on the question, check Suppress and Invalidate.
d. If the pc says he was released but no read on the
question, check Suppress or Invalidate. If pc is assertive
or protesty about having been released, check Asserted
and/or Protest.
B. Rehabbing Grades: Data on using 65 Style to rehab grades
is covered in the "Rehabbing Grades" section of this issue.
C. Rehabbing Former Releases: Data on using 65 Style to
rehab former releases is covered in the "Rehabbing Former
Releases" section of this issue.
II. When it has been determined that the pc was released on
the process or that the ability gained for a grade had been
attained, one proceeds by first finding out when this
occurred, per step 1 below, and then continues with the
remainder of the rehab steps:
1. Loosely locate the session or time in which it occurred.
(Note: This may have to be meter dated if the pc is unable
to locate when it happened. For this reason, any auditor
doing rehabs must be adept at E-Meter Drill 22, "E-Meter
Hidden Date, This Life." Also, see HCOB 2 Aug. 65, RELEASE
GOOFS, point 4, Meter Misuse.)
You simply want to determine when. The pc may give you the
year, month and day of the release, he may describe it by
significance ("The moment I thought to myself, 'That's why
I wrecked the car!'"), or he may spot when it occurred by
location ("It occurred when I was in session for the first
time with Joe in his new auditing room"). The reference for
this is HCOB 8 June 63, THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS, BULLETIN 2, HANDLING THE TIME TRACK.
NOTE: The indicators which tell you that the release is
rehabilitated are an F/N on the meter and VGIs on the pc.
If this occurs on any step of the rehab procedure, simply
indicate the F/N and gently end off on that rehab action.
2. Get in Suppress, Invalidate buttons on the session or time.
3. Get in "Unacknowledged" or "What was unacknowledged."
4. Indicate anything found to the pc as bypassed charge.
5. Find the key-in that was keyed out in that time or
session. (The person went release because something keyed
out in that time or session.)
6. When this is found and recognized by the pc, the pc will
recover the release and the process or grade will be
rehabilitated.
7. If this does not happen, find out what keyed in (at some
point after the release) that ended the release state and
get it loosely located as in step l.
8. Repeat steps 2 to 6 on it.
9. CONDlTIONAL: If, when the above is done, the release
still has not rehabbed, get the pc to itsa alternately the
point of key-out when the pc released and the point of
key-in afterwards, one after the other. (Use the meter to
guide the pc, if necessary, by asking "What's that?" when
you see a fall on the needle.) This isn't an
alternate/repetitive question- "What was keyed out
then?"/"What was keyed in then?"-but a use of these and any
such wording, one after the other, as itsa invitations
until the release is regained and F/N, VGIs obtained.
CHECKING FOR EPs
If one wants to check if the pc has reached the EP of a
process or if one suspects that the EP may have been
reached out of session, one can check, "Did anything
occur?" per HCOB 5 Dec. 71, END PHENOMENAS, and if the EP
has been reached it can be rehabbed using the Rehab 65
Style. One would never ask leading questions or feed the EP
to the pc in such situations. Simply check if anything
occurred.
PROCEDURE FOR REHAB BY COUNTING
1 . Establish there is something to be rehabbed.
(Naturally, you can't rehab a release if there isn't one.
You couldn't rehab a process if the pc had never run it.)
The question would vary depending on the situation being rehabbed.
a . If it looks (due to overrun phenomena) as though a
process has been overrun in session, one could ask, "Have we
bypassed a release point on this process?"
b. For rehabbing releases on drugs on the Scientology Drug
Rundown, one would check, "Did you go release on (______)?"
2. If there is a release, the question should read. If no
read, check Suppress and Invalidate. There must be a read
either on checking the question or on the pc's origination
that there is a release there, before proceeding with the
rehab.
3 . If no read but the pc says he was released, check if
the release has been Suppressed or Invalidated. If the pc
is asserting release or being protesty about it, check
Asserted and/or Protest.
4. Sometimes the pc will F/N simply on spotting he was
released. This can be quite common especially when the pc's
ruds are in and the auditor's TRs are smooth.
An F/N with good indicators tells you that the rehab is
complete and the mass has keyed out or the state has been
rehabilitated.
5. If no F/N on spotting there was a release, ask the pc
how many times he was released. Get him to count the number
of times and when he gets it he will F/N.
6. Sometimes the pc can't get the number and the auditor
can then use the meter to count how many times and get it
that way. He can ask the pc if he has some idea of the
approximate number of times and then use "More than
?"/"Less than ?" He uses the tech of E-Meter Drill 22 to
establish the general range of number of times. He would
then count to the pc. ("Were you released on ( ) 10 times?
11? 12?" etc.) The correct number of times will read and,
when indicated, will F/N.
Rehab by Counting is a simple procedure but it can get
messed up by an
uncertain attitude on the part of the auditor or by rough
auditor TRs, so be sure you are confident and well drilled.
BRIDGING FROM REHAB BY COUNTING
TO 65 STYLE
If, even with the ruds in, doing a Rehab by Counting
doesn't F/N, one can bridge over into a Rehab 65 Style and
rehab it that way. Doing a Rehab 65 Style will clean up any
bypassed charge on the release and allow it to rehab.
If on the Rehab by Counting the pc had said he was released
several times, one would have to find the primary release
point (the one "that is most real to him," or when he "had
the biggest win," etc.) in order to do the Rehab 65 Style
steps on that release point. Handled smoothly in this way,
you will be able to rehabilitate the release, with F/N, VGIs.
DATE/LOCATE PROCEDURE
The Date/Locate procedure is very thoroughly covered in
HCOB 15 Nov. 78, DATING AND LOCATING, and thus is not
repeated here. It is based upon the fundamental principles
of rehab tech, but the additional theory and full Date/
Locate procedure contained in HCOB 15 Nov. 78 must be
understood and drilled well, before it is done on any pc.
ADDITIONAL DATA ON SPECIFIC
USES OF REHAB PROCEDURES
If one is to handle rehabs, he must know the fine
differences involved in the application of rehab tech to
each type of thing to be rehabbed.
For example, the rehabbing of grades and the rehabbing of
former releases differ from each other and they also differ
slightly in some of their steps from the rehabbing of
specific processes as covered earlier in this issue.
For this reason each is taken up separately here in its own
section.
REHABBING GRADES
The rehabilitation of any grade is done on the basis of
actual auditing having been done to the end product of the
specific ability gained for the grade on all flows.
(Note: Pcs should be quadded up by the time they receive
their grades.)
One does not rehab a grade by checking "Did anything
occur?" or "Were you released on Grade ?" Of course
something would have occurred on the grade and the pc would
have released each time a process or a flow on a process of
the grade F/Ned.
This is not what you're looking for.
The end phenomena of a grade is the attainment of an
ability by the pc which he did not previously have. Each
level of the Grade Chart results in a specific ability
gained by the pc when he does that particular grade. These
are expressed on the Grade Chart in the "Ability Gained"
column.
The specific ability for each of the four flows of a grade
is listed in HCOB/ HCO PL 23 Oct. 80R II, CHART OF
ABILITIES GAINED FOR LOWER LEVELS AND EXPANDED LOWER GRADES.
These are what you are interested in finding out and rehabbing,
if they have been attained.
You want to determine that the pc has gained the ability
for each flow of the grade when you are rehabbing. It's
not: Did he get his Grade 0 ability? It's: Is he willing
for others to communicate to him on any subject? Does he no
longer resist communication from others on unpleasant or
unwanted subjects? Yes? Good, he's made it on Flow 1 of
Grade 0.
Does he have the ability to communicate freely with anyone
on any subject? Is he free from or no longer bothered by
communication difficulties, and no longer withdrawn or
reticent? Does he like to outflow? If so, he's attained the
ability on Flow 2 of Grade 0.
One checks each flow of a grade for the ability of that
flow in this way. If the pc says he can't, or if he reads
on the meter as being unable to communicate freely to
others, for example, then you know he is not complete on
that grade. He would need to have an FES done at least as
far back as the beginning of that grade and any errors
found corrected, and then more processes for that grade run
on all flows until the ability gained had been genuinely
attained. Further data about handling the pc who hasn't
made a grade is contained in C/S Series 4.
A Dianetics pc who couldn't honestly say he was a well and
happy human being would need more somatic items run out R3RA.
One would never try to rehab a grade the pc had never
really been run on or, for instance, Q-and-A with a pc who
asserted he was a Grade 2 Release because he went to
confession as a youth. The abilities gained of the grades
are attained only by auditing on the various processes of
each grade. The results of well-run grades are light-years
above anything that other fields or practices can offer, so
don't sell them short by omitting or quickying. them.
The procedure, then, for rehabbing a grade is as follows:
1. Establish from folder study that the pc has run the
processes of the grade on all flows in the first place.
There should be some evidence in the folder that the pc has
attained the grade, whether previously declared or not. He
should have run enough processes for this to be evident.
2. Show the pc (with pc on the meter) the written statement
of the ability gained for Flow 1 of the grade, and have him
read it. (Ref: HCOB/HCO PL 23 Oct. 80R II, CHART OF ABILITIES
GAINED FOR LOWER LEVELS AND EXPANDED LOWER GRADES)
3. Then check with the pc as to whether he has attained (or
"can do") the ability for that flow of the grade, as stated
in HCOB/HCO PL 23 Oct. 80R II.
4. If he has attained it, rehab it by Rehab 65 Style.
5. Repeat steps 2 and 3 on the ability gained for each of
the--remaining flows (Flows 2, 3 and 0) of the grade.
6. If the pc has attained the ability on each flow of the
grade, he is a valid Release on that grade.
7. If the pc doesn't have the ability gained for one or
more of the flows of the grade, he doesn't have the
abilities of the grade. The processes (and the flows) he
ran on it would have to be FESed to locate any errors. The
errors found would have to be corrected and any unflat
process flattened. Also, any missed processes for that
grade would need to be run until the pc really had the
ability gained for each flow of the grade.
REHABBING FORMER RELEASES
Rehabbing former releases came into being in 1965 and was done most
frequently in that year and the years immediately following
it, after the grades had been established. At that time it
was necessary to clear up and get acknowledged the former
releases a pc may have had during his processing in the
previous years, and to determine that he had been released
on each grade before he went onto Power and Clearing.
It is still a very valid tech that is used when needed.
It may in some instances be done, at the adjudication of
the C/S, where a case is having trouble or is bogged and
the C/S suspects from folder study that the case may be
hung up on former release points.
In genning the pc in to this action, ensure he understands
what is being looked for. Although one uses Rehab 65 Style,
the action is not the same as rehabbing a grade or even
exactly the same as rehabbing a process. Here you are
looking for times in the pc's auditing history, recent or
distant, when he felt good in sessions. This would not
necessarily have to be a specific EP of a process the pc
ran or the EP of a particular grade. Rehabbing former
releases is not limited by reference to any specific
process or grade. Also, when the pc is asked about an
earlier release, he may offer up a time he felt released
from something in life. If so, this would be checked and
handled just as any other release point, as in this action
you are going to rehab any and all validly reading release
points the pc may offer. When a former release is found, it
is rehabbed by the 65 Style.
The procedure for rehabbing former releases is:
1. Ensure the pc's ruds are in and that he has been through
steps 1-6 of the section "Indoctrinating the Pc," in this
issue.
2. Have the pc demo the idea of former releases as it
applies to auditing and to life until he's got it.
3. R-factor the pc that you are going to rehab any former
releases he may have had.
4. Clear the question: "Have you been released earlier?"
Then check the question.
5. If you get a read on clearing or checking the question,
find out what the release was on.
a. If no read on the question when cleared or checked,
check Suppress and Invalidate.
b. If pc says he was released earlier but no read on the
question when cleared or checked, check Suppress or
Invalidate. If the pc is assertive or protesty about having
been released, check Asserted and/or Protest.
6. When it has been determined that the pc has been
released earlier, one then proceeds per step 1 of Rehab 65
Style instructions until one gets an F/N and rehabilitation
of the former release.
7. One then checks for any other former releases by
checking, "Is there another time you were released
earlier?" and handles per steps 5 and 6 above.
8. Repeat step 7 as long as the pc has former releases to rehab.
9. Conditional: If on steps 5a or 5b the meter doesn't read
or ceases reading even after Suppress, Invalidate, Asserted
and/or Protest are checked, or if an ARC break needle turns
on while doing the rehabs, one checks for and handles any
ARC breaks which may be present in the session or connected
with the thing you are trying to rehab.
After handling any ARC breaks, recheck for former releases
and handle until the auditor, pc and meter are in agreement
that any former releases have been rehabbed and that there
are no ARC breaks preventing any former release from
reading. It may be necessary to also check and handle the
other rudiments (PTP and Missed Withholds) to ensure there
is nothing preventing any former release from reading.
10. Conditional: If the pc has a big win in rehabbing
former releases, one would let him have his win and end the
session. When sessions are resumed, one would then check
for and handle any remaining former releases.
When all the pc's former releases have been rehabbed, the
action is complete.
ADVICE TO AUDITORS AND C/Ses ON REHABS
Meter Dependence
In using the meter on a rehab of any sort, one does not
want to get into a situation where the pc is made dependent
on the meter for obtaining data. One uses the meter in a
rehab only when the pc is unable to come up with the data
needed. In getting the number of times released on a
process, for instance, the auditor would get the pc to
establish the number of times released and only if the pc
could not get it would the auditor use the meter to find
the number of times released. This all comes under
increasing the pc's certainty of his data and is best
expressed in HCOB 4 Aug. 63, E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION
CYCLE ERROR.
RELEASE REHAB BLOCKS
There are three main reasons why a release rehab on a
subject or action might hang up:
1. Out-ruds
2. The pc was never released on it in the first place
3 . There is something earlier on the track which was
similar to it. (For example, in rehabbing a drug, the pc
may have been released on a similar drug back on the track.)
1. Out-ruds: When a rehab is not going to an F/N, you will
usually find that it is being done over an out-rud. This
can be (a) an out-rud on the subject of the rehab or (b) an
out-rud in the rehab session itself.
While you are rehabbing, you watch the pc to make sure his
good indicators remain in because you could get an ARC
break needle on it and not notice it. An ARC break needle
is easy to establish because you've got bad indicators with it.
Where you have bad indicators with an ARC break needle,
just put in the ruds on the subject.
EXAMPLE: The auditor is rehabbing releases in the taking of
ether and it won't F/N. The auditor could ask, "In the
taking of ether was there any ARC break?" One can put in
the ARC break, Problem and Missed Withhold ruds, if they
are reading.
The out-ruds might have occurred before the point of
release, and this can be checked for as well.
The actual mechanism which you're using is: If it won't
rehab and the F/N is an ARC break needle, then there's
trouble afoot of some kind or another. Just put in the ruds
on the subject.
If there is roughness in the rehab session, an ARC break
needle could occur. If so, get the ruds in on the session
and complete the rehab.
2. The pc was never released on it in the first place: A
release rehab on a subject or action might hang up because
the person never did go release on it. In other words, the
F/N does not rehab because it did not happen in the first
place. If it is a process or grade, the handling would be
to run it to EP.
3 . Earlier-similar: Sooner or later you are going to find
someone who won't release during a rehab on a specific
subject or action. The overrun is so overrun that the
releases are no longer available in it.
You can put in the ruds in connection with that subject or
action (or the session if that is needed). But if it just
won't rehab at all, there is still a way you can handle it:
Ask the pc if there was anything earlier on the track that
was similar to the subject or action.
EXAMPLE:
Auditor: "Well, did you take anything earlier on the track
that was similar to kerosene?"
Pc: "Oh, yes, yes. We used to take balderdash in the old
days, I just remembered. Yes." (F/N)
Auditor: "Thank you. Your needle is floating."
Rehabs are very simple to do provided the auditor's comm
cycle is not rough or distracting and both he and the pc
understand what is being done on a rehab and how the
procedures go. The action is one of destimulation not
restimulation. It is done with a light touch and is a
smooth action. One doesn't get into forcing the pc on a rehab.
Drilling the different rehab procedures must be a part of
any high-crime checkout on this bulletin so that the
auditor can confidently handle any situation that might
arise during a rehab.
The best way to run a session is to be so sharp as an
auditor that you never let the pc overrun in the first
place. But should this occur or should you inherit a pc
that another auditor has overrun, or should life and
livingness knock out a release state, this issue lays out
the steps for restoring any type of release.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
054. HCOB 21 DEC 80RA r. 23 Apr 91 THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 DECEMBER 1980RA
REVISED 23 APRIL 1991
Remimeo
Tech/Qual
Class III Auditors
and Above
Scn DRD Co-audit
Course
THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN
Refs:
HCOB 30 June 65 RELEASE, REHABILITATION OF FORMER RELEASES
AND THETAN EXTERIORS
HCOB 21 July AD 15 RELEASE REHABILITATION
HCOB 7 Nov. 65 RELEASE REHABILITATION ERROR
HCOB 19 Dec. 80R REHAB TECH Rev. 16.11.87
HCOB 30 June 62 ARC PROCESS
I have just finalized a new rundown concerning the handling
of drugs. It is called the Scientology Drug Rundown and it
uses Scientology auditing techniques to handle drugs on
Dianetic Clears who, of course, cannot be run on engrams
and the New Era Dianetics Drug Rundown. This rundown will
make for smoother gains up the Grades and OT levels for the
Dianetic Clear because it will handle any charge on the
case on the subject of drugs. And in some instances it
could mean the difference between a case that is resistive
and rocky and a case that flies in auditing.
THEORY
It is very important to handle the effects of drugs,
medicine and alcohol on a case. In the 60s drug use became
widespread in the culture and it was then that I discovered
the need to audit out drugs as a first action on pcs. Drugs
make it difficult to get stable auditing gains. In fact, a
drug history makes one a resistive case in many instances
until the drugs are handled.
This requires both an objective and a subjective handling.
The Purification Rundown and TRs and Objectives Co-audit
Course are objective handlings; they don't involve or
directly address the person's own thinkingness to
accomplish the intended results. These rundowns work
wonders when done correctly.
Normally, the subjective handling consists of the New Era
Dianetics Drug Rundown, wherein the pc's engrams and mental
pictures concerning drugs are erased.
The total package, then, is made up of objective and
subjective handlings. Both are necessary to effect the
proper result. The objective handlings (Purification
Rundown and TRs and Objectives Co-audit) won't do the whole
job by themselves.
The case which has gone Clear prior to receiving a NED Drug
Rundown has had no means of handling the subjective aspects
of drugs until now. You must not run engrams on a Clear, so
the problem we were faced with solving was: how do you
handle a case's charge on drugs if you can't run engrams on
him?
Well, I've put together a lineup which solves this problem simply
and effectively - the Scientology Drug Rundown. It accomplishes
a necessary release of charge on drugs, and thus helps to
remove drugs as a case factor for Dianetic Clears and
allows them to get the maximum gains out of the Grades and
OT levels. The Scientology Drug Rundown also runs with
enormous benefit on preclears after the Purification RD and
the TRs and Objectives Co-audit, as covered in HCOB 12 Nov.
81RD, GRADE CHART STREAMLINED FOR LOWER GRADES.
THE LINEUP
The Scientology Drug Rundown handles charge on drugs with
the following tools:
1. Rehabbing chemical releases on drugs, which unsticks the
person from masses pulled in during drug experiences or "trips."
2. Recalls on drugs to handle the charge on drugs and drug
incidents.
3. Further Objective Processing to extrovert the person
after the charge is handled.
REHABS OF RELEASES ON DRUGS
Definition: RELEASE-When the preclear disconnects from the
bank that is a Release. When you take a thetan out of a
mass that is a Release. This is not the same as getting rid
of the mass which is called erasure. There are many
releases which normally occur in auditing. The
Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart, displayed in
any org, explains these in detail.
Definition: REHAB (Short for REHABILITATION)-When the person was
originally released he had become aware of something that
caused the Reactive mind to destimulate at that point or
become weak. This is a Release. When the sudden point of
awareness is again found, the Release state can be regained
or rehabilitated. The procedure of regaining a former
Release state is called a rehab.
Some years ago I made the discovery that drugs can give a
person the sensation of releasing from the bank while
pulling in mass on the person at the same time. This is one
of the factors which makes drugs as deadly as they are.
When such "chemical releases" are located and rehabbed, the
person becomes unstuck from mass pulled in during "trips."
This is covered in HCOB 23 Sept. 68, DRUGS AND TRIPPERS.
Drug rehabs were part of the original Class VIII Drug
Rundown and are now reinstated as the first step of the
Scientology Drug Rundown.
RECALL PROCESSING
One of the oldest methods of processing we have in
Dianetics and Scientology is the Recall Process. It has
been a mainstay of auditing techniques since 1951. It has a
new application now on the Scientology Drug Rundown.
The charge a Dianetic Clear has on drugs can be released by
running charged drugs using simple Recall techniques. On
the Scientology Drug Rundown this is done after the drug
rehabs.
OBJECTIVE PROCESSING
In order to extrovert the pc's attention after the Recalls,
one runs some Objective Processing. This isn't a long
parade of processes. It is just intended to get the pc
extroverted and in PT.
AUDITOR REQUIREMENTS
In order to deliver the Scientology Drug Rundown, any auditor must:
1. Be at least a Provisional Class III Auditor.
2. Have high crimed this issue and drilled the procedure
until he can attest he knows it cold.
3. Have high crimed HCOB 19 Dec. 80R, REHAB TECH, and thoroughly
drilled the rehab procedures until expert.
(Note: The rundown can also be delivered by an unclassed
auditor on a properly supervised co-audit.)
PRECLEAR PREREQUISITES
The Scientology Drug Rundown is for cases who have gone
Clear before having completed a New Era Dianetics Drug
Rundown. I discovered in 1978 that we had been far more
successful in making Clears than anybody had guessed. A
number of these Clears had attained the state prior to
getting their drugs run out using Dianetics.
Also, some went Clear while on the Drug Rundown itself and
were left with charge connected with drugs. So the
prerequisites for someone receiving the Scientology Drug
Rundown are:
1. Is Dianetic Clear (but NOT in the Non-Interference Zone.
See HCOB 23 Dec. 71RB, C/S Series 73, THE NO-INTERFERENCE AREA
CLARIFIED AND RE-ENFORCED).
2. Has not had a full NED Drug Rundown or was on it when
Dianetic Clear was attained and so has charged drugs unrun.
3. Has done a successful Purification Rundown.
4. Has done the TRs and Objectives Co-audit Course or a
full, thorough program of Objectives.
Note: A case not yet Clear may receive the rundown after
points 3 and 4.
It will be pointless to run someone on the Scientology Drug
Rundown without points 3 and 4 above well in, so don't do it.
PROCEDURE
Preliminary Steps:
1. Fly the pc's ruds so he is F/N, VGIs before starting the
rundown.
1A. CONDITIONAL STEP: If the pc has never had an Original
Assessment Sheet done on him, do one per HCOB 24 June 78RA,
NED Series SRA, ORIGINAL
ASSESSMENT SHEET. Even though the pc is not going to be run
on Dianetics, the Original Assessment Sheet must be done if
he has never before had one in his auditing. This will
provide the C/S, the D of P and the auditor with essential
data on the case.
2. From the pc, get a list of each drug, medicine or
alcohol he has taken this lifetime if one doesn't already
exist in the folder. Note the read the item gives at the
exact end of the pc's statement of the item. If a drug list
already exists, it may be used and a new list need not be made.
3. Clear the terms "release" and "rehab" and the rehab
procedure with the pc if these have not been cleared
previously. Use HCOB 19 Dec. 80R, REHAB
TECH. Make sure the pc has a good grasp of what rehabs are
and how they fit into the Scientology Drug Rundown
procedure as explained on page 2 of this issue.
A. Drug Rehabs:
1. R-factor the pc that you will now begin rehabbing
releases on drugs.
2. Clear the question "Did you go release on _____?" and
let the pc know you will fill in the blank with an item
(drug) off the drug list and that this is the question you
will use to check for releases on each drug.
3. Take the first drug off the list and check the question
with the pc, noting any instant read.
Note: Each drug will be checked for release whether or not
the drug read when listed. You are looking for periods when
the pc felt released while he was under the influence of
the drug and this is not dependent on whether the drug is
reading in PT. To repeat, each drug on the list is checked
for release, reading or not.
4. If the question reads and the pc was released, find out
how many times he was released and it will F/N. Don't go at
this too strenuously. It is a light action and the pc may
F/N just on spotting that he had felt released on the drug.
5. If no read on the question but the pc says he did go
release, check Suppressed or Invalidated. (The Assert or
Protest buttons may be checked if the pc is assertive or
protesty about having gone release.)
6. If the question reads but the pc says he didn't go
release, the read is False or Protest. Find which and handle.
7. If no read on the question, check Suppress and
Invalidate. If still no read, leave off trying to rehab it.
Instead, do Step 8.
8. If the pc didn't go release on the drug (or if there is
an ARC break F/N while rehabbing it), put in ruds on the
drug by checking and handling the following questions:
a. "IN TAKING (drug) WAS THERE AN ARC BREAK?"
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.
b. "IN TAKING (drug) WAS THERE A PROBLEM?"
Itsa E/S to F/N.
c. "IN TAKING (drug) WAS A WITHHOLD MISSED?"
Pull it E/S to F/N.
An out-rud can obscure a release, so after the ruds have
been put in on the drug, recheck for a release. If still no
release, that's it. Drop it and go on to the next drug.
9. Occasionally a rehab won't go to F/N even though the pc
did release on the drug. If this occurs put in ruds on the
period before the release using the following questions:
a. "BEFORE THE RELEASE ON (drug) WAS THERE AN ARC BREAK?"
b. "BEFORE THE RELEASE ON (drug) WAS THERE A PROBLEM?"
c. "BEFORE THE RELEASE ON (drug) WAS A WITHHOLD MISSED?"
With the ruds in, continue the rehab.
10. If you get a release that just won't rehab, clear the
following question and ask the pc, "DID YOU TAKE ANYTHING
EARLIER ON THE TRACK THAT WAS SIMILAR TO (drug)?" (When you
find and rehab that earlier drug, the one which wouldn't
rehab also releases, so there is no need to go back to the
one which was hung up.)
11. Repeat Steps 3-10 as necessary for each remaining drug,
medicine or alcohol on the drug list. Each item is checked
for release whether it is reading or not. Of course, the
rehab question itself must read before you proceed with any
rehab steps.
12. When all the drugs on the list have been checked you
can ask the pc if there are any other drugs he would like
to add to the drug list. If so, add them, being sure to
catch any read. Then, on any added items do Steps 3-10
until all items on the list have been handled.
These steps comprise the first part of the Scientology Drug
Rundown.
B. Recalls on Drugs:
On this part of the rundown each reading drug on the drug
list is run out using Recall Processing. PC INTEREST IS NOT
CHECKED. If the item reads, run it.
O. CONDITIONAL: If the drug list used is one which already
existed in the folder before the person went Clear the list
would have to be reassessed at this point to see which
items were reading in PT. It is possible that charge on
some of the items would have keyed out or blown when the
person went Clear and if the list were not assessed in PT,
items might get run which do not have available charge.
(Items added by the pc on Step 12 of the Drug Rehabs
section of this RD are validly reading if they read when
the pc listed them.)
1. Taking the item with the largest read (sF or better),
run it in the commands below. (Clear a flow before running
it for the first time.)
Note: A flow must read before it is run as covered in HCOB
3 Dec. 78, UNREADING FLOWS.
Flow 1: "RECALL A TIME YOU TOOK/HAD (drug being run)."
Run it repetitively to F/N, Cog, VGIs.
Flow 2: "RECALL A TIME YOU GAVE ANOTHER (drug being run)."
To F/N, Cog, VGIs.
Flow 3: "RECALL A TIME ANOTHER GAVE ANOTHER OR OTHERS
(drug being run)."
To F/N, Cog, VGIs.
Flow 0: "RECALL A TIME YOU GAVE YOURSELF (drug being run)."
To F/N, Cog, VGIs. (Quad pcs only.)
Note: Ensure the pc tells you what he has recalled. A pc
may just recall the time and not tell you about it unless
you ask him "What was it?" or some such question.
2. When the first reading drug selected has been run to EP
on each reading flow take the next best reading drug off
the list and run it as covered in Step 1.
3. Repeat Steps 1 and 2 until all reading drugs have been run.
4. Reassess the items on the list which didn't read on
first assessment. Run any now-reading items as per Step 1.
Use the Suppress and Invalidate buttons as needed.
5. Repeat the reassessment of any unreading items (using
Suppress and Invalidate as needed) until all reading items
have been run.
When all reading items have been run, the Recalls on Drugs
portion of the rundown is completed.
C. Objective Process:
The final step of the Scientology Drug Rundown consists of
running the pc on an Objective Process. The purpose of this
is to extrovert his attention after it has been introverted
while doing the subjective parts of the rundown. Almost any
Objective Process would do, so long as it had not been run
before.
Which Objective Process gets run is not so important as the
point that something must be run to extrovert the person's
attention. It can be a process as simple as Reach and
Withdraw on the environment per HCOB 10 Apr. 81R, REACH AND
WITHDRAW. Whichever process is run it would be taken to a
point where the pc was cheerful, fully extroverted and in
present time.
This completes the rundown.
ABILITY GAINED AND EP
The Ability Gained of the rundown is "Released from harmful
effects of drugs, medicine or alcohol." Doing each step of
the Scientology Drug Rundown fully will achieve that EP on
any pc who is fully set up for it in the first place.
There are gains to be had from this rundown which might not
be expected from such a seemingly simple set of actions.
Run a pc or two on the rundown and you'll see what I'm
talking about.
One thing which you may observe on pcs is a point of sudden
resurgence during or near the end of the rundown. At this
point, the pc comes up to PT and out of drug masses or
ceases to be introverted and becomes extroverted (both of
the above are the same thing-the phenomenon of the person
having been parked down the track due to drugs and then
snapping up to PT). This is significant and shows that the
EP of the rundown has been obtained.
Depending on the pc, this resurgence may happen suddenly,
accompanied by a big cog, dial-wide F/N and VVGIs, in which
case, one would be safe to end off the Recall steps of the
rundown. Any charge on drugs will have moved off. So you
can run an Objective Process next and that would complete
the rundown.
On other cases, the resurgence may not be as sudden, i.e.,
it will happen gradually with the pc rolling happily along,
having his wins and cogs and feeling better session after
session. He may remark that he is feeling more in PT and
this is to be expected. In these cases, one continues
handling reading drugs and reassesses the drug list as
needed to ensure that all charged drugs and flows are run
to EP. By the time this is done and the pc has run the
ending Objective Process, if the auditing has been standard
he will have come up to PT and out of drug masses just the
same as the pc who achieves this as a big win and sudden
resurgence. The end product is the same in both cases.
It is very important, however, that the Recall step is not
ended simply because the pc has a good win which is
mistaken for the EP. To do this could result in the auditor
and C/S being accused of taking part in a very disreputable
activity- quickying. And nobody wants to be hung with that
kind of reputation!
If there is any question as to whether a big win the pc has
had represents the resurgence being looked for, continue
the rundown after the pc has had his win. You will be safe
in doing this. No one thus far has shown evidence of
overrun when continuing the rundown past the point of a big
win (after the persistent F/N dies down, of course) and in
completing the steps of the rundown. (As a note, that
possibility does exist though, if the pc's big win also
happened to be the EP. Should this occur and the pc begin
to manifest overrun of the rundown-and not simply overrun
of a process or drug-then the EP is rehabbed and the
rundown completed with the Objective Process.)
If no point of resurgence occurs in the pc, then something
is amiss with the auditing the pc has received. An FES
would have to be done to locate the errors and they would
have to be repaired. The FES may have to only go back a few
sessions or the whole case may need to be FESed.
TIPS
Pcs often have big wins on these Recall Flows, followed by
persistent F/Ns.
When this happens it is wise to let the pc have his win so
you don't miss a reading drug or flow because of the F/N.
Occasionally the pc may run a flow that runs much longer
and deeper than other flows.
Don't be surprised if drug manifestations turn on while
running certain drugs- they blow when the process is taken
to EP. And don't mistake the euphoria of a drug incident in
restim for the EP of a flow.
It is not unusual for a pc to go through a revivification
on this rundown. This isn't anything to puzzle over though,
as it is simply something which may occur on this rundown.
If it does occur, don't stop the process. Carry on and the
pc will come through it.
SPECIAL NOTE
Occasionally, a pc goes Clear in the middle of the NED Drug
Rundown. In such a case, the correct thing to do is a
verification and rehabilitation of the attainment of the
state to full EP and resurgence, per the Clear Certainty
Rundown. After this is done, the Scientology Drug RD Recall
steps are done on the remaining unhandled drugs which are
now reading. You would have to reassess the unhandled
portion of the drug list before doing any Recalls to
ascertain which drugs would now get run.
The drug rehabs would not need to be done on these cases.
PREVIOUSLY RUN DRUGS
Once in a while a C/S will run across a Dianetic Clear who,
despite having had a Drug Rundown still has unhandled
charge, incidents and masses in connection with drugs.
Possible reasons for this are: drug residues left in the
body which prevented auditing gains; lack of a full set of
Objectives as contained on the TRs and Objectives Co-audit
Course thoroughly done each one to EP; or poorly done or
quickied auditing on the Drug Rundown itself.
Such a case might be obvious from an FES of the Drug
Rundown the person
had. Where such things as no Objectives run or "run to EP
in 3 minutes," drug items unrun because the pc had "no
interest" in the item (which usually means the person was
no longer interested in taking the drug), reading items
left unrun or items not run to full EP, are obvious from
folder study, the C/S may find that the case would need the
Scientology Drug Rundown. This would particularly apply to
Dianetic Clears who still manifested heavily the effects of
drugs whether in auditing, on post or in life.
(Ref: HCOB 8 Jan. 69, DRUGS AND "INSANITY" -NONCOMPLIANCE AND
ALTER-IS applies in particular, but all the 1969 HCOBs on
drugs as well as later issues would also apply and help the
C/S decide whether the case is one which would benefit from
the Scientology Drug Rundown.)
The point here is that a case that has gone Dianetic Clear
and had a poorly done Drug Rundown could possibly hang up
on auditing on the Expanded Lower Grades because of
unhandled charge on drugs.
If this proved to be the case through folder study and
other indicators the basic handling would be:
1. Purification Rundown
2. TRs and Objectives Co-audit
3. End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List
4. Scientology Drug Rundown.
This battery of actions would handle any lingering
unhandled drug charge or manifestations on a Dianetic Clear
due to botched earlier drug handling.
CAUTIONS AND REMEDIES
Never run Recalls on the same drug twice. Never run
unreading drugs or flows.
To do so may drop the pre-OT into more charge than one can
easily get him out of.
Should such happen and not resolve by the usual means
(rehabbing the overrun, indicating an uncharged drug or
flow was taken up and shouldn't have been or L1C on the
session) the auditor can assess an L3RG and indicate any
reads to key out the charge. No engram running would be done.
One should take care not to Q-and-A off the rundown into
handling some other case manifestation or hidden standard.
The purpose of the rundown is to handle drug charge,
enabling the pc to make case gain in his subsequent
auditing (where other aspects of the case would be handled).
An auditor can mistakenly let the pc itsa on and on if his
TR 2 and session control are not in. This cuts down the
effectiveness of the rundown. If the auditor doesn't
control this (without ARC breaking the pc however) he can
run the pc's havingness down and plow him in.
One must not audit this rundown (or any other for that
matter? over out-ruds. If this has occurred, the action to
take is to fly the pc's ruds checking for "audited over"
("Have you been audited over ____?") or an L1C on the
recent session or sessions.
Should the rundown be messed up it can be repaired with the
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List.
SUMMARY
We now have a method for handling drugs on a person with
unhandled drugs who, because he has gone Clear, should not
be run on engrams, as well as for handling drug charge on
persons not yet at the level of New Era Dianetics. It is
essential to handle drugs as covered in this issue.
Otherwise one is placing the person in jeopardy of wasting
his auditing on the Grades as it will have been done over
the bypassed charge of unhandled drug incidents.
Once a pre-OT has attained OT III any remaining effects
from drugs can be terminatedly handled on the OT Drug Rundown.
Using this simple procedure we can ensure that anyone
attains all the gains possible in his Grade Chart auditing,
quite in addition to the relief and expansion one
experiences when freed from drug influences, as will occur
on this new rundown.
We now have the means by which the effects of drugs can be
effectively handled for anyone at any position on the Bridge.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
055. HCOB 23 DEC 80R r. 12 Jul 88 EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 DECEMBER 1980R
Issue I
REVISED 12 JULY 1988
Remimeo
Auditors
C/Ses
Execs
Tech/Qual
EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST
The Executive Correction List is designed to help locate
the individual reasons an executive has for not applying
standard administrative tech and policy.
It can be used to handle charge in the area of being an
exec or difficulties as an exec. It could also be used to
help a failed exec clean up his charge.
The list is assessed Method 3 or Method 5, as directed by
the C/S. (Ref: HCOB 28 May 70, CORRECTION LISTS, USE OF;
HCOB 20 Dec. 71, C/S Series 72, USE OF CORRECTION LISTS;
HCOB 10 June 71 I, C/S Series 44R, PROGRAMING FROM
PREPARED LISTS)
Under some of the questions there are two separate sets of
handling instructions.
Where this is the case, the handling given in the first set
of parentheses is the one the auditor does directly in the
session. The instructions in the second set of parentheses
are used by the C/S in programing out the actions to be
done to complete the pc's handling, after all the reading
items on the list have been F/Ned.
There is a form attached to this list on which the C/S
notes corrective actions to be taken. The C/S fills out the
form by carefully reviewing what was found in F/Ning the
questions which read and then listing out the steps to be
done to correct the situations found. Actions ordered by
the C/S can include such things as cramming, retread or
retrain of earlier courses, drilling, TIPing and standard
ethics handlings including Security Checking. The completed
form is routed to the Dir of Correction, who sees that the
handlings get done. Any case actions needed to complete the
person's handling would be included as part of his auditing
program.
PC'S NAME:______________ DATE:_____________________
AUDITOR:________________________________
1. OUT INT?
(Check to make sure the read on Int is a valid read and not a
protest or false read. If it is valid, indicate it. If the
pc is not Clear or OT, give him a standard Int RD per Int
RD Series 2. If he is Clear or OT and has not had an Int RD,
give him the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int RD Series 4RA.
If the pc has had an Int RD or End of Endless Int Repair RD, do
an Int RD Correction List [HCOB 29 Oct. 71RA]. If Int correction
has already been done on the pc, get an FES of the Int RD and its
corrections. If you are not qualified to audit or repair Int,
turn the pc over to a qualified auditor. When all errors are
corrected, the C/S may order the End of Endless Int Repair RD
per Int RD Series 4RA, as applicable.)
2. OUT-LIST? _________
(L4BRA and handle.)
3. GIVEN A WRONG WHY? _________
(L4BRA and handle.)
4. GIVEN A WRONG WHY FOR EXEC FAILURES? _________
(L4BRA and handle.)
5. CRAMMING GAVE A WRONG WHY? _________
(L4BRA and handle.)
6. WRONG ETHICS CONDITION? _________
(L4BRA and handle.)
7. TOLD YOU WERE PTS AND YOU WEREN'T? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. L4BRA if any trouble.)
8. AS AN EXEC DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
9. UPSET WITH A STAFF MEMBER? ANOTHER EXEC?
SENIOR EXEC? _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N on each reading upset.)
10. AS AN EXEC DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
11. PROBLEMS WITH OTHER STAFF MEMBERS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
12. AS AN EXEC HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? _________
(Pull it, E/S to F/N.)
13. WITHHOLDS FROM STAFF? _________
(Pull them, E/S to F/N.)
14. OVERTS ON STAFF? _________
(Pull them, E/S to F/N.)
15. OVERTS ON YOUR POST? _________
(Pull them, E/S to F/N.)
16. COUNTER INTENTION? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
17. SOME SORT OF OUT-ETHICS? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
18. DISAFFECTED? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
19. HAVE YOU ORIGINATED OR FORWARDED BLACK PR? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
20. OUT-EXCHANGE? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.) (Program for Exchange by
Dynamics per HCO PL 4 Apr. 72, ETHICS.)
21. LAZY? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.) (Program for Exec Confessional
and/or False Purpose RD, as applicable. )
22. INACTIVE? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.) (Program for Exec Confessional
and/or False Purpose RD, as applicable.)
23. IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR POST, DO YOU HAVE AN
EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION? _________
(Get what the evil purpose or destructive intention is and handle
with steps A-G of False Purpose Rundown procedure. If you are
not an FPRD Auditor, 2WC E/S to F/N.) (Program for False
Purpose RD, including Exec and Staff Member Form.)
24. OUT-2D? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
25. OUT-2D WITH PUBLIC? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
26. DO YOU HAVE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
27. DOING OTHER THINGS ON POST TIME? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
28. FALSE REPORTED? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
29. FALSIFIED A STAT? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
30. COLLECTED FALSE BONUSES? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
31. COULDN'T GET PAID? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
32. GRANTING SPECIAL FAVORS? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
33. RECEIVING SPECIAL FAVORS? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
34. MOONLIGHTING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
35. PTS TO SOMEONE IN THE ENVIRONMENT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
36. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE HOSTILE TO
DIANETICS OR SCIENTOLOGY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
37. PTS STAFF MEMBERS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
38. PAST ETHICS CONDITION MESSED UP? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (Program for handling per HCO PL 19 Dec.
82 II, REPAIRING PAST ETHICS CONDITIONS.)
39. ETHICS CONDITION LEFT INCOMPLETE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (Program for handling per HCO PL 19 Dec.
82 II, REPAIRING PAST ETHICS CONDITIONS, or complete
the incomplete formula per HCO PL 3 Aug. 85, COMPLETING
CONDITIONS FORMULAS, as applicable.)
40. DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
41. LOSSES AS AN EXEC? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. L1C as needed.)
42. COULDN'T HELP? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
43. AN EARLIER TIME YOU FAILED TO HELP? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
44. COULDN'T SOLVE IT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
45. SELDOM REFER TO POLICY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
46. UNHATTED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
47. DON'T HAVE A HAT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
48. DON'T STUDY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
49. TROUBLE WITH STUDY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
50. FAILED AS A STUDENT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
51. BLOWN STUDY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
52. OFF COURSE TO HANDLE POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
53. WAS YOUR TRAINING INADEQUATE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
54. RUSHED THROUGH COURSES? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
55. INCOMPLETE COURSES? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
56. FALSE ATTEST? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
57. MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS IN DIANETICS AND
SCIENTOLOGY? _________
(Find and clear them, each to F/N. WCCL if necessary.)
58. AN EARLIER SIMILAR SUBJECT WAS MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
(2WC-find what subject and what word in that subject was
misunderstood. Clear it to F/N. WCCL if necessary.)
59. SEEKING STATUS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
60. ARE YOU PRETENDING? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
61. DISAGREEMENTS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (If needed, program for Disagreement Check
per HCOB 22 Mar. 72RA, DISAGREEMENT CHECK.)
62. EARLIER PRACTICE IN YOUR ROAD? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
63. MISSING DATA? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
64. WITHHOLDING DATA? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (If needed, program for Vital Info RD, False
Purpose RD.)
65. HERE FOR ANOTHER PURPOSE? _________
(Pull it, E/S to F/N.)
66. EVALUATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
67. INVALIDATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
68. DISINTERESTED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N, handle any out-ruds.)
69. HAVE YOU COMPROMISED YOUR OWN REALITY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
70. COULDN'T GET YOUR ORDERS COMPLIED WITH? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
71. TROUBLE HANDLING PERSONNEL? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
72. TROUBLE GETTING POLICY FOLLOWED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
73. NEGLECTING A BOGGED AREA? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N, watch for any out-rud and handle.)
74. TROUBLE COMMUNICATING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
75. 2D TROUBLES CAUSING CONFLICT ON POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
76. DIFFICULTY COMPLETING A CYCLE OF ACTION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
77. AFRAID TO GIVE ORDERS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
78. OUT OF COMM? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N, watch for any out-rud and handle.)
79. IS YOUR AREA UNDERMANNED? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
80. ARE YOU CONSTANTLY HIT BY BAD NEWS AND DISASTERS
ON YOUR LINES? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
81. CONSTANTLY HAVING TO COPE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
82. CONSTANTLY PHASE ONEing YOUR AREA? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
83. COMPULSIVELY BYPASSING OTHERS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (Program for compulsive bypasser handling
per HCO PL 22 Mar. 85, FULL DANGER CONDITION HANDLING.)
84. OVERLOADED ON POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
85. CONFUSED BY TOO MANY THINGS TO DO? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
86. OVERWHELMED ON POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
87. NO BACK-UP? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
88. FAILED PURPOSE? _________
(Indicate it. 2WC E/S to F/N.)
89. NO HELP FROM YOUR SENIOR? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
90. Q AND A? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
91. AFRAID TO USE ETHICS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
92. ARE YOU AFRAID OF THE PUBLIC? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
93. MISUSE OF ETHICS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N, watch for any out-rud and handle.)
94. ARE YOU PROTECTING YOUR STATUS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
95. USING DURESS? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
96. DOING SOMETHING OTHER THAN YOUR HAT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N, watch for any out-rud and handle.)
97. AS AN EXECUTIVE, HAVE YOU DECIDED YOU WON'T MAKE IT? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
98. WERE YOU TAKEN OFF POST UNJUSTLY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
99. ARE YOU NOT REALLY ON POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
100. ARE YOU TRYING TO LEAVE POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
101. ARE YOU EXPECTING TO BE REMOVED FROM POST? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
102. SHOULD YOU BE SOMEWHERE ELSE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
103. DON'T YOU LIKE THE STAFF YOU WORK WITH? _________
(Find out which staff he doesn't like [not L&N]. Pull overts and
withholds on each reading person E/S to F/N.) (If needed,
program for False Purpose RD.)
104. THIRD PARTYING STAFF? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
105. USING UNUSUAL SOLUTIONS? _________
(Handle as a W/H, E/S to F/N.)
106. POLICY DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
107. TECH DOESN'T WORK ON YOU? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
108. FAILED DEBUGS? _________
(Assess and handle Product Debug Repair List.)
109. DEBUGS DIDN'T WORK? _________
(Assess and handle Product Debug Repair List.)
110. THINGS GOT WORSE AFTER A DEBUG? _________
(Assess and handle Product Debug Repair List.)
111. FELT BAD AFTER CRAMMING? _________
(Assess and handle Cramming Repair List.)
112. FAILED CRAMMING? _________
(Assess and handle Cramming Repair List.)
113. CRAMMING DOESN'T WORK? _________
(Assess and handle Cramming Repair List.)
114. DON'T GET AUDITING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
115. TAKEN OFF AUDITING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
116. ARE THERE STOPS? _________
(Find out what. Clean up any protest E/S to F/N.)
117. ARE YOU ON DRUGS? MEDICINE? ALCOHOL? _________
(2WC to F/N.)
118. ATTENTION FIXED ON SOMETHING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
119. NOT GETTING ENOUGH SLEEP? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.) (Handling of the person's schedule to be
worked out in liaison with his senior.)
120. NOT EATING? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
121. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY ILL? _________
(2WC to find what. Note BD item. 2WC to F/N.)
122. RESTIM? _________
(Assess and handle a C/S 53 to F/Ning.)
123. TROUBLE WITH YOUR OWN CASE? _________
(Assess and handle C/S 53 to F/Ning.)
124. IS THERE NOTHING WRONG? _________
(Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate to
F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N at first.)
125. SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(2WC what and, if no joy, GF M5 and handle.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
056. Attachment EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
HCOB 23.12.80R I
Rev. 12.7.88
Attachment
EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
TO: DIR CORRECTION DATE:_______________
FROM: CASE SUPERVISOR ____________________________________________
RE: PC
______________________________________________________________
The following hatting and Qual correction actions were
found to be needed on this executive in assessing and
handling an Executive Correction List. These actions are in
addition to auditing actions found needed in handling the
list, which are being included in the pc's programing.
PART A: The following additional training actions are to be
done on this exec as part of a standard TIP.
1. Done ________
2. Done ________
3. Done ________
4. Done ________
5. Done ________
PART B: The following corrective actions are also to be
done on this exec.
1. Done ________
2. Done ________
3. Done ________
4. Done ________
5. Done ________
________________________________
C/S
Handlings
completed: ________________________________
Dir Correction
________________________________
Date
ROUTE THIS FORM TO THE PERSON'S PC FOLDER WHEN COMPLETED.
==================