No matching fragments found in this document.
Date: 21 Aug 1999 02:20:19 -0000
Subject: FZ Bible NEW TECH VOL XII 13/17 (1980-4)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <673ec054c148b4fd888fb43c5f66afbf@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 2076
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!skynet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:899768 alt.clearing.technology:97264
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
NEW TECH VOL XII 13/17 (1980-4)
**************************************************
NEW TECH VOLUME XII 1980-84
(As issued in 1991 by CofS)
==================
[Because of its large size, the complete contents only appears
in part 0 and part 1.]
CONTENTS:
Part 13
120. HCOB 12 APR 83 LIST OF KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING SERIES
121. HCOB 3 MAY 83 C/S Ser 117 WHO OR WHAT IS A "C/S"?
122. HCOB 7 AUG 83 ROBOTIC TRs
123. HCOB 8 AUG 83 CYCLING THROUGH TRs
124. HCOB 19 AUG 83 OT III COURSE POSH-UP
125. HCOB 27 AUG 83 WC Ser 69 WORDS AND ASSOCIATIONS
126. HCOB 10 SEP 83 PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
127. HCOB 23 OCT 83 SEC CHECKING: NOTE
128. HCOB 3 JAN 84 Purif Ser 7 RADIATION AND LIQUIDS
129. HCOB 10 JAN 84 Study Ser 12 THE USE OF DEMONSTRATION
130. HCOB 16 JAN 84RA HRD Ser 1RA THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
131. HCOB 16 JAN 84 Cram Ser 17 REPAIR OF PAST CRAMMING
132. HCOB 17 JAN 84 HRD Ser 2 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS
133. HCOB 18 JAN 84 HRD Ser 3 HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
==================
120. HCOB 12 APR 83 LIST OF KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING SERIES
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 APRIL 1983
(Also issued as HCO PL 12 Apr. 83, same title)
Remimeo
All Tech
All Qual
All Students
AOs
SHs
Cl IV Orgs
Missions
LIST OF KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING SERIES
The following is the full list of the Keeping Scientology
Working Series issues:
HCO PL 7 Feb. 65 KSW Series 1
Reiss. 27.8.80 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
HCO PL 26 May 61 KSW Series 2
Reiss. 30.8.80 QUALITY COUNTS
HCO PL 29 May 61 KSW Series 3
Reiss. 30.8.80 QUALITY AND ADMIN IN CENTRAL ORGS
HCO PL 14 Feb. 65 KSW Series 4
Reiss. 30.8.80 SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY
HCO PL 17 June 70RA KSW Series 5
Re-Rev. 27.4.81 TECHNICAL DEGRADES
HCO PL 26 Oct. 71 KSW Series 6
Reiss. 30.8.80 TECH DOWNGRADES
HCO PL 30 May 70 KSW Series 7
Reiss. 30.8.80 CUTATIVES
HCOB 19 Apr. 72 C/S Series 77
Reiss. 30.8.80 KSW Series 8 "QUICKIE" DEFINED
HCOB 25 June 70RB II C/S Series 12RB
Re-Rev. 27.9.80 KSW Series 9 GLOSSARY OF C/S TERMS
HCOB 21 June 70 C/S Series 9
Reiss. 30.8.80 KSW Series 10 SUPERFICIAL ACTIONS
HCO PL 25 Jan. 80 KSW Series 11 Reiss. 30.8.80
EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
HCO PL 31 July 65 KSW Series 12
Reiss. 30.8.80 PURPOSES OF THE QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION
HCO PL 8 Mar. 66 KSW Series 13
Reiss. 30.8.80 HIGH CRIME
HCO PL 10 May 70 KSW Series 14
Reiss. 30.8.80 SINGLE DECLARE
HCOB 26 Aug. 70R C/S Series 17R
Rev. 22.9.80 KSW Series 15 INCOMPLETE CASES
HCO PL 2 Nov. 61 II KSW Series 16
Reiss. 30.8.80 TRAINING QUALITY
HCOB 15 Jan. 70 II KSW Series 17
Reiss. 30.8.80 HANDLING WITH AUDITING
HCOB 19 June 71 II C/S Series 46
Reiss. 30.8.80 KSW Series 18 DECLARES
HCOB 8 Oct. 70 C/S Series 20
Reiss. 30.8.80 KSW Series 19 PERSISTENT F/N
HCOB 16 June 70 C/S Series 6
Reiss. 30.8.80 KSW Series 20 WHAT THE C/S IS DOING
HCOB 22 Jan. 77 Cramming Series 13 KSW Series 21
Reiss. 12.4.83 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT
HCO PL 16 Apr. 65 KSW Series 22
Reiss. 12.4.83 THE "HIDDEN" DATA LINE
HCOB 9 Feb. 79 KSW Series 23
Reiss. 12.4.83 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH
HCOB 15 Feb. 79 KSW Series 24
Reiss. 12.4.83 VERBAL TECH: PENALTIES
HCO PL 22 Nov. 67RA KSW Series 25
Reiss. 12.4.83 OUT-TECH
HCO PL 13 Sept. 65R KSW Series 26
Rev. 16.2.81 OUT-TECH AND HOW TO GET IT IN
HCO PL 16 Mar. 71R KSW Series 27
Reiss. 16.2.81 WHAT IS A COURSE?
HCO PL 30 Jan. 83 KSW Series 28
Reiss. 12.4.83 YOUR POST AND LIFE
HCO PL 31 May 68 KSW Series 29
Reiss. 12.4.83 SCIENTOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
HCO PL 29 Sept. 82 KSW Series 30
Reiss. 12.4.83 MISREPRESENTATION OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
HCO PL 27 May 65 KSW Series 31
Reiss. 12.4.83 PROCESSING
HCOB 3 Mar. 69 KSW Series 32
Reiss. 12.4.83 COMPLETING LEVELS
HCOB 10 June 60 KSW Series 33
Reiss. 12.4.83 WHAT WE EXPECT OF A SCIENTOLOGIST
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
121. HCOB 3 MAY 83 C/S Ser 117 WHO OR WHAT IS A "C/S"?
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 MAY 1983
Remimeo
Tech/Qual
Snr C/S Hats
C/S Hats
Auditors
Tech Sec
Qual Sec
C/S Series 117
WHO OR WHAT IS A "C/S"?
Refs:
HCOB 21 Aug. 70 C/S Series 16 SESSION GRADING, WELL DONE,
DEFINITION OF
HCOB 10 Nov. 70 C/S Series 21 C/S RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRAINING
HCOB 5 Mar. 71 C/S Series 25 Auditor Admin Series 10
THE FANTASTIC NEW HGC LINE
HCO PL 6 Mar. 71 Org Series 24 LINE DESIGN
HCOB 9 June 71 II C/S Series 42 C/S RULES
HCOB 8 Aug. 71 C/S Series 55 THE IVORY TOWER
HCOB 25 Aug. 71 Auditor Admin Series 2 C/S Series 56
HOW TO GET RESULTS IN AN HGC
HCOB 1 Sept. 71 I C/S Series 57 A C/S AS A TRAINING OFFICER
A PROGRAM FOR FLUBLESS AUDITING
HCOB 7 Sept. 71 C/S Series 58 PROGRAMING CASES BACKWARDS
HCOB 22 Sept. 71 C/S Series 61 THE THREE GOLDEN RULES OF THE C/S
HCO PL 29 Oct. 71 II Exec Series 1 THE EXECUTIVE
HCO PL 29 Oct. 71 III Exec Series 2 LEADERSHIP
HCOB 20 Nov. 73 II C/S Series 89 F/N WHAT YOU ASK OR PROGRAM
HCOB 26 Sept. 74 HANDLING FLUBBED PCs
HCOB 28 Sept. 82 C/S Series 115 MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS
HCO PL 7 Apr. 83 Exec Series 37 PR Series 48 GOODWILL
The C/S is the CASE SUPERVISOR.
He has to be (a) an accomplished and properly certified
auditor and (b) a person trained additionally to supervise
cases.
The C/S is the auditor's "handler." He tells the auditor
what to do, corrects his tech, keeps the lines straight and
keeps the auditor calm and willing and winning.
The C/S is the pc's case director. His actions are done FOR THE PC.
The C/S may believe or be told that he is working for gross
income or quantity as opposed to quality.
What he is actually accomplishing can be listed:
1. The C/S is keeping Scientology working in the hands of
auditors for the benefit of pcs.
2. The C/S is keeping the correct sequence of programs and
processes being used on the pcs.
3. The C/S is keeping the org tech flow lines straight and
in proper sequence of actions.
4. The C/S has the repute of the org and Dianetics and
Scientology in his area fully in his hands.
HANDLING AUDITORS
Studying the worksheets of auditors written during the
session the C/S can tell whether or not they are doing the
processes right, staying within the Auditor's Code,
attaining the end phenomena of the process without chop,
doing what the C/S said to do and generally keeping the
session flowing along with good TRs. Where he detects
errors he puts the auditor right or sends the auditor to
Cramming, specifying the materials to be restudied.
Where he sees that an apparent gain is noted by the auditor
which does not compare with the Examiner' s Report or sees
that Dianetics or Scientology doesn't seem to be wprking,
he has the pc questioned by the Examiner as to what really
happened in the session.
The C/S must earn the confidence of his auditors by knowing
what he is doing and getting results via the auditors.
The skill of an auditor can be enormously improved by a
good C/S. And
reversely, under an incompetent C/S the skill and
enthusiasm of an auditor can be badly deteriorated. A C/S
who fails to see errors the auditor knows were there is
soon regarded as incompetent. A C/S is in effect a tech
leader. His skill, attitude and demands bring about the
state of tech in the area. His attitude toward session
length, the exactness required, the state of case
preparation he requires, when he will let a pc go, what he
demands of his auditors all add up to the general tech
attitude in an org. If this is good, the org will be a
good, respected org.
HANDLING THE PC
The pc (or pre-OT) is the real reason the C/S is there.
All C/Sing as to programing and what to run when is FOR THE
PC. It is not for the org, actually, except as it
influences the org's repute. It is not for the auditor
except as it influences the auditor's willingness and
attitude and skill.
The product the C/S is after is the pc's (or pre-OT's) case
gain.
This is accomplished by applying the usual, by preventing
errors and keeping pcs in session and winmng.
Correctly applied tech works. The C/S has to know this.
Auditor worksheet false reports or an unskilled auditor or
a failure to study the case are the main reasons the pc
does not win.
Thus a C/S who is not policing his actions on the case and
is not detecting departures from standard auditing begins
to believe some cases are very tough, begins to get
inventive and departs from the usual and eventually fails
on cases.
As the C/S is directing the case on a via of the auditor
his view of the case can be obscured. When this occurs he
has an Examiner question the pc about the sessions he has
received. And he can order a 2-way comm session to get the
pc's reactions.
Sometimes a pc has questions. The C/S can have the Examiner
ask a pc who runs oddly what questions the pc has and thus
get them answered.
It is very bad to let a flubbed session go unrepaired. Let
go longer than 24 hours the C/S should not be surprised to
have an occasional unrepaired pc go physically ill.
Thus all repairs of goofed sessions are priority.
A C/S gets so he knows certain cases. But he errs when he
gets upset or angry with a case or regards one with
contempt. A pc's repute has nothing to do with a C/S.
When a C/S begins to regard a case as willful or hopeless
or mean, he might commit errors. Admittedly some cases are
very trying. But there is always a reason. It is up to the
C/S to find it. I have never failed to find the reason some
cases require more work than others.
The C/S is there to efficiently and effectively order the
right action based on a survey of the case and then see
that it is done.
The end product is a winning pc and an expansion of
Dianetics and Scientology.
DIRECTING CORRECT PROGRAM SEQUENCE
The C/S who has mastered the small points of individual
sessions must expand his view, widen it to take in the
whole progress of the pc's or pre-OT's case from his
entrance into auditing to its conclusion-a span which may
include several years, due to many factors.
This SEQUENCE of programs includes the actions laid out on
the Class Chart and Progress and Advance Programs. In
C/Sing any one session, the C/S must fit it into the
overall programed auditing. An assist cutting into an
Interiorization Rundown, not finishing a GF40 Expanded
before doing something else and similar errors in broad
programing can upset a case as much as a bad session.
The C/S must be alert to the broad, long-term cycles of
programs.
CONTROLLING FLOW LINES
Alterations in sequence is an outpoint. Omitting
administrative steps is an outpoint. When the C/S fails to
enforce the correct sequence of actions in the
administration of the cases, the lines go psychotic.
A pc has to have a new invoice to get audited. He may have
a former folder. He needs to have a C/S done. And he has to
be scheduled. And, scheduled, he has to have an auditor and
an auditing room. Then he gets a session. He goes to an
Examiner, is put on a meter and makes a statement. The
meter reads are recorded in the Exam Report, the Exam
Report goes into the folder, the auditor completes his
admin. The folder goes to the C/S for a new C/S.
While most of these actions belong to a Tech Services, WHEN
THEY ARE NOT KEPT IN THE C/S HAS TROUBLE.
The C/S's trouble may be only from the flustered state of a
pc who doesn't know when or where or who, or from an
auditor who is overdue in his last session and is upset by
the rush and upset of the pc. A lot of such factors can
slow down gains.
Thus it's the C/S who must demand that the correct sequence
of events occur, that admin personnel are on their toes.
Ordinarily a C/S does a folder when he receives it. That is
his job. But if he doesn't receive it or doesn't receive it
in correct sequence and form he can't do his job.
I have nearly always been served as a C/S by competent and
dedicated tech admin personnel. I cannot imagine this would
be true for all C/Ses. But when it isn't true a C/S is
obligated to make it true or it will upset his own lines
and affect both his auditors and pcs.
A C/S who "short-sessions" of course increases admin line
stresses. So a C/S who long-sessions will have an easier
time of it generally.
Most of the trouble a C/S has on cases is permitting
auditors on his lines who flub without sending them to retrain.
Thus even competent cramming, if absent, can keep a C/S's
job difficult.
Auditing is a TEAM ACTION.
By doing the usual, and seeing that it is done well, the
C/S has the tech repute of his org in his hands.
The number of public pcs and pre-OTs who leave an org with
F/N VGIs at the Examiner determines the repute of the org
in that area.
The percent of staff members who currently have an F/N VGI
Examiner's
Report as their last report determines directly the
efficiency and solvency and expansion of the org. This is
by actual survey.
Thus the C/S, by knowing tech, by ordering the usual and
seeing that it was smoothly done, by keeping the auditors
willing and supervising the flow lines in correct order is
the person who regulates the future of Dianetics and Scientology.
The hat of C/S is a very honorable hat.
The org and all of us depend utterly on its being very well done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
122. HCOB 7 AUG 83 ROBOTIC TRs
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 AUGUST 1983
Remimeo
Professional tR Course
TR Supervisors
Cramming Officers
TR Students
ROBOTIC TRs
Stiff, unnatural TRs are robotic TRs. Students and auditors
who haven't mastered the TRs will handle communication robotically.
ANATOMY OF A ROBOT
It can be said of robots that:
1. They don't know what a comm cycle is.
2. They have never really passed OT TR 0.
3. They have never really passed TR 0.
4. They have never really passed TR 0 Bullbait.
5. They don't do TR 1 in a new unit of time each time they
give it, so they all sound alike and they probably have TR
3 mixed up with TR 1, or they are stuck in an unflat 0 series
(OT TR 0, TR 0, TR 0 BB).
6. They don't realize their TRs are addressed to the person
in front of them but are probably addressed to the
Instructors for a pass.
And so, with a combination of the above, these students and
auditors will look like robots. They would never get the
product of a pc interested in his own case and willing to
talk to the auditor. And it's possible that they don't know
that that is their product.
The point is that it would be almost impossible for any
student or auditor to go on looking like a robot if he
actually did the TRs.
REMEDY
The remedy for robotic TRs is to put the student back onto
restudy of the basics of ARC and the ARC triangle, the
cycle of communication and the valuable final products of
TRs. (Ref: HCOB 24 Dec. 79, TRs BASICS RESURRECTED) He then
redrills the TRs from OT TR 0 ON UP, each one this time to
a real pass.
The answer for any auditor who looks like a robot is to do
the above steps and fully complete the Professional TR Course.
His pcs will be very glad that he did.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
123. HCOB 8 AUG 83 CYCLING THROUGH TRs
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 AUGUST 1983
Remimeo
Course Checksheets
Professional
TR Course
TR Supervisors
CYCLING THROUGH TRs
ON A PROFESSIONAL TR COURSE
Cycling through TRs on a Professional TR Course has been
given a new definition and action.
Newly defined, cycling on TRs means A STUDENT DRILLS THE TRs,
EACH TO A PASS, UNTIL HE STICKS AND THEN HE IS PUT BACK ON
THE LOWER TR HE DIDN'T PASS.
One reason for this is IT HAS BEEN FOUND CONCLUSIVELY THAT
WHEN A STUDENT IS FLUNKING ON A LOWER TR, HE CANNOT DO AN
UPPER TR.
The obvious handling, then, is to get him standardly
through the lower TR and then graduate him up to the next one.
Originally, cycling through TRs meant the student went up
through the TRs one by one, getting familiar with them and
getting a little bit of a win on each TR before going to
the next one. Then he went back to the beginning and cycled
through the TRs in this fashion again and again until he
achieved a full pass on all the TRs. The gradient of
toughness was supposed to be increased each time through.
That system, however, opened the door to permissiveness and
resulted in students taking interminable lengths of time on
TR courses. Permissiveness has no place on any Professional
TR Course. Nor does it require months to learn to do TRs
correctly.
The time-honored way it was done even earlier when TRs were
being rapidly passed was to simply get a student through
each TR itself. Students do make it when hammered through
each TR in turn until they get a full pass on that TR
before going on to the next TR.
That is the rough, tough way it was done earlier with
success and it has also proven successful more recently.
There is another vital factor upon which this hinges,
however, and that is that the student MUST have an
understanding of the ARC triangle and the cycle of
communication and he MUST have done the full comm cycle
in clay.
With those basics in and each TR then drilled and passed in
turn, we get results.
Thus, we arrive at a new definition for cycling through TRs
and we arrive at the following rules:
ON PROFESSIONAL TRs, DONE THE HARD WAY, STUDENTS DRILL
EACH TR TO A PASS, ONE AT A TIME.
IF A STUDENT HAS TROUBLE AND HANGS UP AND CAN'T PASS AN
UPPER TR, HE HASN'T MADE IT ON A LOWER TR. PUT HIM BACK ON
THE LOWER TR HE DIDN'T PASS AND GET THROUGH IT TO A REAL
PASS. HE THEN RE-DRILLS EACH TR FROM THAT POINT UP, EACH
COMPETENTLY TO A PASS.
IF STUDENT HANGS UP ON THE LOWER TRs, PUT HIM ALL THE WAY
BACK TO RESTUDY ARC AND THE CYCLE OF COMMUNICATION AS
THERE IS SOMETHING THERE HE HASN'T GRASPED.
This regimen is simplicity itself. And it works. It is the
way to fast, successful Professional TR Courses and
auditors with natural, easy, flubless TRs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
124. HCOB 19 AUG 83 OT III COURSE POSH-UP
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 AUGUST 1983
BPI
AOs
FSO
Reges
Tech/Qual
Advance Courses
Supers
C/Ses
Students
OT III COURSE POSH-UP
The OT III Course, the celebrated "Wall of Fire" level, has
now been updated in its checksheet and associated materials
to reflect the technical advances made in recent years
which are vital to all pre-OTs studying this level.
There has been NO change in the phenomenal technology of OT
III, of course.
What has been done is a review and alignment of all the
materials, and a full updating and recompilation of the
checksheet with additional drills which even better prepare
a pre-OT to Solo audit the materials of Section III OT.
The result is a fully updated and poshed-up course.
So for pre-OTs approaching OT III - a sparkling bright,
fully updated course, containing some of the most astounding
technology of all my research, awaits you! And it is being
issued in course packs containing fresh, newly printed,
crystal-clear issues of my original materials.
The "Wall of Fire" has now, again, been given the
red-carpet treatment that it richly deserves!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
125. HCOB 27 AUG 83 WC Ser 69 WORDS AND ASSOCIATIONS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 AUGUST 1983
Remimeo
Tech/Qual
Word Clearers
Cramming Officers
Course Supervisors
Estos
Word Clearing Series 69
WORDS AND ASSOCIATIONS
Ref:
HCOB 23 Mar. 78RA Word Clearing Series 59RA
Rev. 14.11.79 CLEARING WORDS
(The following material is from my research notes on study
tech. It is released here for the first time to give
further data on some of the fundamental theory underlying
Word Clearing and study tech.)
A word may be difficult to grasp if it has unpleasant
personal associations.
To define is sometimes not enough. One must also ask for
examples. In giving these or demonstrating, unpleasant
associations are discharged.
One might well conclude, were it not for a knowledge of
even more basic causes, that general stupidity was only
the sum of unpleasant associations grown too great to
permit an approach to any word and thus cancelling any
understanding, and that blindness and withdrawal were
caused only by an accumulation of painful contacts with
the objects of life.
To remedy either of these - stupidity or blindness and
withdrawal - it is only necessary to coax a confrontation
of the milder words or objects and thus reveal to the being
that unpleasant associations were matters of past
specialized significance rather than current general hostility.
Perhaps past-life forgottenness is only the dwindling
spiral of retreat from unpleasant contacts, and old age
itself might well be the vanishing of a life by retreating
from it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
126. HCOB 10 SEP 83 PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1983
Remimeo
HCOs
E/O Hats
MAA Hats
Tech/Qual
All Staff
PTS/SP Course
PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
Refs:
Tape: 6505C18 "Organization and Ethics"
Tape: 6506C08 "Handling the PTS"
HCO PL 23 Dec. 65RA Rev. 10.9.83 SUPPRESSIVE ACTS,
SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS
Tape: 6608C02 "Suppressives and GAEs"
Tape: 6608C25 "The Antisocial Personality"
HCOB 27 Sept. 66 THE ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST
HCOB 24 Apr. 72 I C/S Series 79 PTS INTERVIEWS
HCO PL 3 May 72R Exec Series 12 Rev. 18.12.77 ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES
HCOB 10 Aug. 73 PTS HANDLING
HCOB 29 Dec. 78 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
HCOB 31 Dec. 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING
HCOB 31 Dec. 78 III EDUCATING THE PTS THE FIRST STEP TOWARD
HANDLING: PTS C/S-1
HCO PL 20 Oct. 81R PTS TYPE A HANDLING Rev. 10.9.83
HCOB 8 Mar. 83 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
THEORY
Perhaps the most fundamental right of any being is the
right to communicate.
Without this freedom, other rights deteriorate.
Communication, however, is a two-way flow. If one has the right to
communicate, then one must also have the right to not
receive communication from another. It is this latter
corollary of the right to communicate that gives us our
right to privacy.
These rights are so basic that governments have written
them into laws - witness the American Bill of Rights.
However, groups have always regulated these rights to one
degree or another.
For with the freedom to communicate come certain agreements
and responsibilities.
An example of this is a marriage: In a monogamous society,
the agreement is that one will be married to only one
person at one time. That agreement extends to having
second-dynamic relations with one's spouse and no one else.
Thus, should wife Shirley establish a 2D-type of
communication line with someone other than her husband
Pete, it is a violation of the agreement and postulates of
the marriage. Pete has the right to insist that either this
communication cease or that the marriage will cease.
HANDLE OR DISCONNECT
In the HCOBs on PTS tech you'll see the phrase "handle or
disconnect." It means simply that.
The term "handle" most commonly means, when used in
relation to PTS tech, to smooth out a situation with
another person by applying the tech of communication.
The term "disconnection" is defined as a self-determined
decision made by an individual that he is not going to be
connected to another. It is a severing of a communication line.
The basic principle of handle or disconnect exists in any
group and ours is no different.
It is much like trying to deal with a criminal. If he will
not handle, the society resorts to the only other solution:
It "disconnects" the criminal from the society. In other
words, they remove the guy from society and put him in a
prison because he won't HANDLE his problem or otherwise
cease to commit criminal acts against others.
It's the same sort of situation that husband Pete is faced
with in the example mentioned above. The optimum solution
is to handle the situation with wife Shirley and her
violations of their group (marriage) agreements. But if
Pete cannot handle the situation, he is left with no other
choice but to disconnect (sever the marriage communication
lines if only by separation). To do otherwise would be
disastrous, for he is connected to someone antagonistic to
the original agreements, postulates and responsibilities of
the group (the marriage).
A Scientologist can become PTS by reason of being connected
to someone that is antagonistic to Scientology or its
tenets. In order to resolve the PTS condition, he either
HANDLES the other person's antagonism (as covered in the
materials on PTS handling) or, as a last resort when all
attempts to handle have failed, he disconnects from the
person. He is simply exercising his right to communicate or
not to communicate with a particular person.
With our tech of handle or disconnect, we are, in actual
fact, doing nothing different than any society or group or
marriage down through thousands of years.
LOST TECH
Earlier, disconnection as a condition was cancelled. It had
been abused by a few individuals who'd failed to handle
situations which could have been handled and who lazily or
criminally disconnected, thereby creating situations even
worse than the original because it was the wrong action.
Secondly, there were those who could survive only by living
on our lines - they wanted to continue to be connected to
Scientologists (see the HCOBs on the characteristics of an
SP). Thus, they screamed to high heaven if anyone dared to
apply the tech of "handle or disconnect."
This put Scientologists at a disadvantage.
We cannot afford to deny Scientologists that basic freedom
that is granted to everyone else: the right to choose whom
one wishes to communicate with or not communicate with.
It's bad enough that there are governments trying, through
the use of force, to prevent people from disconnecting from
them (witness those who want to leave Russia but can't!).
The bare fact is that disconnection is a vital tool in
handling PTSness and can be very effective when used correctly.
Therefore, the tech of disconnection is hereby restored to
use, in the hands of those persons thoroughly and
standardly trained in PTS/SP tech.
HANDLING ANTAGONISTIC SOURCES
In the great majority of cases, where a person has some
family member or close associate who appears antagonistic
to his getting better through Scientology, it is not really
a matter of the antagonistic source wanting the PTS to not
get better. It is most commonly a lack of correct
information about Scientology that causes the problem or
upset. In such a case, simply having the PTS disconnect
would not help matters and would actually be a nonconfront
of the situation. It is quite common that the PTS has a low
confront on the terminal and situation. This isn't hard to
understand when one looks at these facts:
a. To be PTS in the first place, the PTS must have
committed overts against the antagonistic source; and
b. When one has committed overts, his confront and
responsibility drop.
When an Ethics Officer finds that a Scientologist is PTS to
a family member, he does not recommend that the person
disconnect from the antagonistic source. The E/O's advice
to the Scientologist is to handle.
The handling for such a situation is to educate him in the
tech of PTSness and suppression, and then skillfully and
firmly guide the PTS through the steps needed to restore
good communication with the antagonistic source. This
eventually dissolves the situation by bringing about an
understanding on the part of the antagonistic source as to
what Scientology is and why the PTS person is interested
and involved in it. Of course, when this is accomplished
you no longer have a PTS at all-and you may very well find
a new Scientologist on your hands!
The actual steps and procedure of this sort of handling are
well covered in the materials listed at the beginning of
this HCOB.
WHEN DISCONNECTION IS USED
An Ethics Officer can encounter a situation where someone
is factually connected to a suppressive person, in present
time. This is a person whose normal operating basis is one
of making others smaller, less able, less powerful. He does
not want anyone to get better, at all.
In truth, an SP is absolutely, completely terrified of
anyone becoming more powerful.
In such an instance the PTS isn't going to get anywhere
trying to "handle" the person. The answer is to sever the
connection.
HOW TO DISCONNECT
How a disconnection is done depends on the circumstances.
Example: The pc lives next door to, say, a psychiatric
clinic and feels PTS due to this environment. The remedy is
simple - the pc can move to another apartment in another
location. He need not write any sort of "disconnection
letter" to the psychiatric clinic. He simply changes his
environment - which is, in effect, a disconnection from the
suppressive environment.
Example: A pc is connected to a person or group that has
been declared suppressive by HCO in a published ethics order.
He should disconnect and, if he wants to inform the SP of
the fact, he may write a letter of disconnection. Such a
letter would be very straightforward. It would state the
fact of the disconnection and the reason for it. It would
not be misemotional or accusative, since this would only
serve to stir up further antagonism. The letter would be
inspected by the Ethics Officer before it was sent and
copies kept for the PTS person's own ethics file and pc
folder.
No attempt would be made to establish communication with
the declared SP "to clear matters up" or to seek to reform
the SP. The SP's reform is strictly in the hands of HCO.
The PTS simply disconnects.
Example: One discovers that an employee at his place of
business is an SP - he steals money, drives away customers,
wipes out other employees and will not correct no matter
what you do. The handling is very simple-the PTS fires him
and that's the end of it right there!
To fail or refuse to disconnect from a suppressive person
not only denies the PTS case gain, it is also supportive of
the suppressive-in itself a Suppressive Act.
And it must be so labeled. (Ref: HCO PL 23 Dec. 65RA,
SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND
SCIENTOLOGISTS)
SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
There is of course another technical way to handle PTSes
and that is to get them through all problems they have had
with the terminal involved and the PTSness will disappear
(Ref: HCOB 29 Dec. 78, THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN).
But it still requires that during the handling the person
disconnects.
SUMMARY
The technology of disconnection is essential in the
handling of PTSes. It can and has saved lives and untold
trouble and upset. It must be preserved and used correctly.
Nothing in this HCOB shall ever or under any circumstances
justify any violations of the laws of the land. Any such
offense shall subject the offender to penalties described
by law as well as to ethics and justice actions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
127. HCOB 23 OCT 83 SEC CHECKING: NOTE
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 OCTOBER 1983
Remimeo
All Sec Checkers
All Auditors,
Level II and Above
Confessional Checksheets
Tech/Qual
HCO
SEC CHECKING: NOTE
An auditor doing a Sec Check can run into a phenomenon that
goes like this: The pc says to the auditor, "I am in
possession of a lot of secret data - therefore, I cannot get
off my withholds." And the auditor buys it and the case fails.
Actually, this is in large measure a lie, used to cover
actual overts against the group or its VIPs.
When you look at the definition of a real overt as
something contrary to the mores of a group, you realize
that the withhold one is looking for is a withhold of
having committed an actual overt on the group by omit or
commit. At best you see that the pc excuse does not wash.
If the auditor were to ask for "overts contrary to the
mores of the group and withholds of having done them or
omitted actions that by omission caused harm to the group
or its people," one gets around that excuse.
The GO people and many others pull this.
The auditor technically is NOT interested in confidences or
overts against a group's enemies or withholds thereof. He
is looking for overts against the group as above and the
withholding of having committed them by omit or commit.
If this were made plain to Sec Checkers, the swindle could
no longer be pulled by such pcs and the cases would not fail.
A failed case will continue to be one as long as he is
committing overts on the thing that is supposed to help
him. But, with skilled auditing, this can be handled.
I hope this helps resolve some "failed cases."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
1984
==================
128. HCOB 3 JAN 84 Purif Ser 7 RADIATION AND LIQUIDS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1984
Issue III
Remimeo
Purif C/Ses
Purif I/Cs
Tech/Qual
Purification Rundown Series 7
RADIATION AND LIQUIDS
In Purif, findings seem to bear out that there is a factor
related to radiation that produces the greatest exudation
of it and this is the sweating itself.
Radiation is apparently enormously water soluble as well as
water movable.
According to researchers, one merely has to take a hose to
a building surface or a road to wash the radiation off of
it. This factor is well known to defense-trained personnel.
So where one is doing a Purif, one should be very careful
to ensure that actual sweating occurs and in volume. The
intake of water is therefore quite vital during a Purif.
This has a side effect, however, of washing a lot of
minerals out of the system as well, possibly, as vitamins.
Thus the intake of minerals and vitamins during Purif is
also a necessity.
It is possible that a Purif RD is not as workable when
profuse sweating does not occur, when liquid intake is not
large to compensate for it and when vitamins and minerals
of a water soluble nature are not carefully and adequately
replaced. (The common vitamins taken on the Purif RD which
are not water soluble are vitamins A, D and E.)
This gives us three important points that must be in on a
Purification Rundown:
1. PROFUSE SWEATING MUST OCCUR.
2. A PERSON'S LIQUID INTAKE MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY LARGE
TO COMPENSATE FOR THE LIQUID LOST THROUGH SWEATING.
3. VITAMINS AND MINERALS MUST BE TAKEN IN SUFFICIENT
QUANTITIES TO REPLACE THOSE WASHED OUT OF THE SYSTEM
THROUGH SWEATING.
As megavitamin dosages are also part of a Purif program,
this mineral and vitamin intake is quite in addition to any
other vitamin therapy ongoing at the time.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
129. HCOB 10 JAN 84 Study Ser 12 THE USE OF DEMONSTRATION
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JANUARY 1984
(Also issued as HCO PL 23 July 81R I)
Remimeo
Student Hat
Students
Supervisors
Study Series 12
THE USE OF DEMONSTRATION
Refs:
HCO PL 4 Oct. 64 THEORY CHECKOUT DATA
HCOB 11 Oct. 67 CLAY TABLE TRAINING
Demonstration comes from the Latin demonstrare, to point
out, show, prove.
The Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary includes the
following definition of "demonstrate":
"to teach, expound or exhibit by practical means."
A "demonstration" or "demo" is usually done with a "demo
kit" which consists of various small objects such as corks,
caps, paper clips, pen tops, rubber bands, etc.
The student demonstrates an idea or principle with his
hands, the paper clips on his desk, etc.
HISTORY
The original use of demonstration was during a checkout to
detect glibness. The idea behind a "demo kit" was that,
during a checkout by an examiner or twin, the student could
be made to show that he really knows what he's talking
about. There was no demonstration that the student did for
himself.
Later, the use of the demo kit became extended and altered
to mean the student fiddles with the demo kit continually
while studying. A PL, written by another (and long since
cancelled), made the statement that "the student mocks up
what he reads as he reads it with the bits and pieces of
his demo kit." This statement was not correct. I never
developed this use of the demo kit.
This business of fidgeting with the demo kit has nothing to
do with demonstration, as all it demonstrates is a quickie,
surface understanding.
STAR-RATE CHECKOUTS
The demo kit is used during a star-rate checkout. It is the
answer to glibness.
You give the student a paper clip and a wooden block and a
few leather or rubber bands and say, "You just show me with
these things exactly how this would happen." If the student
can't show you anything about it at all, you make him study
it again until he gets the idea. He has to show you his
understanding, because if he can't put this in demo form in
some fashion or another then he doesn't understand it.
THE BASIC PURPOSE OF THE DEMO KIT IS TO DEMONSTRATE
UNDERSTANDING.
DEMONSTRATION IN THEORY STUDY
If a student ran into something he couldn't quite figure
out, a demo kit would assist him to understand it. This is
not demanded. It is at the discretion of the student himself.
The more usual action in such a case is actually for the
student to go over to the clay table and work it out
properly in clay in accordance with the clay demonstration
HCOBs.
When people don't understand the use of the clay table,
they sometimes try to substitute a demo kit for it and clay
table could then become limited.
The whole theory of clay demos is that they add mass.
A student needs mass in order to understand something.
Given that, he can sort it out because he has mass and
space and he can then envision it.
Demo kit demonstrations work on this principle too, only a
clay demonstration more closely represents the thing being
demonstrated and provides more mass.
DEMOS AS CHECKSHEET ITEMS
Checksheets very often require students to do demos. The
student simply does the demo and looks up the misunderstood
word each time he can't demo it.
SKETCHING
Sketching is also a part of demonstration and part of
working things out.
Someone sitting at his office desk trying to work something
out doesn't have any clay to hand to work it out with, but
he could work it out with a little demo kit action or a
paper and pencil, draw graphs of it, and so forth. That is
a necessary part of getting a grip on something.
For instance I started to work out the flow line for an
area that I was handling. I first tried to figure it out in
my head, but there was something funny about it that I
couldn't quite put my finger on. The way I finally did
manage to get it was by putting it on a little yellow card.
I would have worked it out sooner, easier and earlier than
I did if I had graphed it all and laid it all out in two
dimensions in the first place.
There is a rule which goes IF YOU CANNOT DEMONSTRATE
SOMETHING IN TWO DIMENSIONS YOU HAVE IT WRONG. It's an
arbitrary rule, but it's very workable.
This rule is used in engineering and architecture. If it
can't be worked out simply and clearly in two dimensions,
there is something wrong and it couldn't be built.
This was the missing piece of demonstration.
I started working with this clear back in 1950 when I was
taught mechanical drawing and engineering and that's where
I developed this datum.
This is a whole area of tech and applies to drawing out
what is in a bulletin, or trying to draw an org plan or a
flow line and so on.
It works in other ways too.
An obvious example is a navigator who, instead of trying to
work it all out in his head with some foggy concept of
where he is, simply graphs the sailing plan and progress on
a chart.
Org boards and statistical graphs are also examples in
their own way.
This is all part of demonstration and part of working
something out.
SUMMARY
1. The basic use of the demo kit is during a checkout to
demonstrate
understanding.
2. If the student wants to work something out and see how
it works, the usual action is to work it out in clay.
3. Sketching is part of demonstration and is particularly
useful for the staff member at his desk or the engineer at
work, etc.
4. Demos also appear on checksheets. If the student can't
demo it, he finds the misunderstood word.
That's the simplicity of demonstration.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
130. HCOB 16 JAN 84RA HRD Ser 1RA THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JANUARY 1984RA
REVISED 27 JUNE 1989
BPI
Happiness Rundown Series 1RA
THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
This rundown is based on the booklet The Way to Happiness.
It has been successfully piloted and now is generally
released to orgs and missions.
The booklet is distributed on general public lines. It is
not a Church publication as it is not religious. The Church
has its own creed and codes.
A minister or pastoral counselor can, however, counsel on
any subject and that the Church sells a rundown based on
the hooklet does not make the booklet religious.
THE WAY TO HAPPINESS
Factually, the world has gotten itself a lot of new
violence potential without also getting a campaign for
higher morality. Such an imbalance is catastrophic. The
police, banks, merchants, insurance people are all in real
trouble through the decline of morality.
The Kentucky school board, right now, is faced with no
morals being taught in their schools. They already have a
crime problem if their schools are like anyone else's.
Materialism and mechanism (these are philosophic schools)
are on a rampage.
The biologists, psychs, evolutionists are pushing them to
the limit. These are blown up by the simple question, "Your
data may be quite correct but you have no proof that there
is not something else that uses all this." Their position
is untenable philosophically. Using materialism, the psychs
and biologists and so on are edging the churches out and
factually are creating a dangerous social situation. At a
time when man can wield unlimited force, he has no moral
codes or restraints.
There factually is no moral code today. The Christian one
was nice. But if you read the Ten Commandments, they are
designed for people several thousand years ago.
There have not been any codes of morals based on common
sense. They are
handed down from heaven, even in China. The psychs use this
to get an inside track.
The US government-and possibly some others-cannot finance
religion, per the First Amendment.
This means they cannot allow children to be taught morals,
and cannot permit any power to churches. The psychs love
that. They are antireligious. They teach that one succumbs
to temptation, that morals are inbred by paralleling the
history of the race and when a child gets old enough his
inbred nerves go moral. This is pure claptrap, but that
happens to be their belief: This means that crime will
worsen, the psychs will ride higher and higher.
Philosophers (not religious ones) over the world in various
times and places have noted these qualities of morality so
don't get the idea this is all derived from China.
Confucius, for instance, was mainly interested in reforming
the government, not the individual.
In all times and all places, the morals contained in this
book have appeared amongst tribes and races.
What they lacked - in China, in the Near East, in Europe -
was some basic principle which made the picture clear.
When I isolated the common denominator, the dynamic principle
of existence, I had such a factor.
I never before applied it to straightening out ideas on the
subject of morality.
But the precepts contained in this book are not just culled
here and there and put together. I worked them out newly
with due attention to what had gone on before in man's
history. His moral codes are woefully inadequate to deal
with modern life. This one will.
There is another point. Nobody could ever possibly have
kept any of the old moral codes. Old Mo-Tzu's code only
lasted a few hundred years until people finally decided you
couldn't keep it-too severe-and they even forgot it ever
existed after about the first century B.C. and only found
it again this century. There have been novels and plays
about someone trying to live the life of Christ and the
hero always winds up in a mess, the lesson being that His
teachings couldn't be followed.
The booklet The Way to Happiness contains a nonreligious
moral code based on common sense. It may be the first such
code.
THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
Essentially, what the booklet does is give people stable
data which holds off confusions. For people will be found
to be quite confused on this subject.
This new moral code is different in that it can be kept. It
consists of 21 major rules or precepts and about 15
subrules making a total of about 36 in all. In number 20
there are about 20 additional items. In all, the rundown,
then, would be handling about 56 separate concepts on the
subject of morality, plus morality itself. There are 10
basic steps for each concept: There are therefore over 500
questions or actions.
This gives one some idea of the length of the rundown.
The object of the rundown is to clear up any confusions on
the subject of morals, any and all transgressions against
these specific morals, to slide the person out of the
valence of any immoral person and obtain an EP of a
realization that one really is on the Way to Happiness.
As these precepts and booklet do contain, in fact, the
major principles of morality as they apply to modern life,
and as it is a fact that tragedy and unhappiness occur when
the points are violated, the rundown can steer the person
in a direction where he is certain he can live a happier
life. So the rundown has been quite successful. It is quite
a tour de force, really, to assemblethe essentials into a
modern moral code. And because these are somewhat
universal, they will be found to have a lot of charge on
them as they were the points where one went off the rails.
The rundown itself picks up specific confusions,
transgressions and valence closures. It can get rid of a
lot of shame, blame and regret. A person should feel pretty
clean and sparky after it. The potential is there.
DELIVERY
The Happiness Rundown may be delivered in missions and orgs
which have:
a. At least one Class IV Auditor who is also a graduate of
the HRD Auditor Course and who has received his Qual Okay
to Audit the Happiness Rundown.
b. A Class IV C/S who is a graduate of the HRD Auditor
Course and who has received his Qual Okay to Audit the
Happiness Rundown.
Additionally, he must have passed a high-crime checkout on
HCOB 21 Jan. 84RA II, HRD Series 6RA, C/Sing THE HAPPINESS
RUNDOWN.
Orgs which meet the above two qualifications may also
deliver HRD auditor training.
Pre-OTs who wish to receive the Happiness Rundown must go
to an AO or the FSO, where delivery personnel are available
to service them.
People could have their grades before or after the
Happiness Rundown. It has no engram running and could be
run anywhere on the chart before Clear or after any
completed level above OT III. The rundown should not be
delivered between Dianetic Clear and OT III or between the
start of New OT V and completion of New OT VIII, unless the
person is stalled or moving slowly up the Bridge. In such
cases the Happiness Rundown may be included as part of a
program to get the person unstalled and moving again. (Ref:
HCOB 27 Mar. 84, C/S Series 119, STALLED DIANETIC CLEAR:
SOLVED)
The booklet itself is running on through the society, and
feeding back pcs to the org even if the rundown is not
religious. As I have said, a pastor can counsel anything.
Good luck with this RD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
131. HCOB 16 JAN 84 Cram Ser 17 REPAIR OF PAST CRAMMING
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JANUARY 1984
Issue II
Remimeo
Qual
Cramming
Officers
C/Ses
Cramming Series 17
REPAIR OF PAST CRAMMING
Refs:
HCOB 24 Nov. 73RE C/S Series 53RL LF (Long Form) Rev. 30.11.78
HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
HCOB 15 Oct. 73RB C/S Series 87RB Rev. 4.12.78 NULLING AND
F/Ning PREPARED LISTS
HCOB 4 Dec. 78 HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N
HCOB 30 Oct. 78 C/S SERIES 53, USE OF
One can review all past cramming a person has had, to repair
any bad cramming. This is done with a C/S 53 on "past cramming
actions," handling major reads by key-out (not rundowns)
and reassessing to an F/Ning list.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
132. HCOB 17 JAN 84 HRD Ser 2 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JANUARY 1984
Remimeo
HRD Checksheets
HRD Auditors
HRD C/Ses
Qual
Happiness Rundown Series 2
HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS
As the booklet The Way to Happiness and its precepts do
contain, in fact, the major principles of morality as they
apply to modern life, and as it is a fact that tragedy and
unhappiness occur when the points are violated, the
Happiness Rundown steers the person in a direction where he
is certain he can live a happier life.
The rundown has proven quite successful. It is quite a tour
de force, really, to assemble the essentials into a modern
moral code. And because these are somewhat universal, they
will be found to have a lot of charge on them as they were
the points where one went off the rails.
AUDITING METHODS
There are two different approaches to auditing the HRD. One
is by assessment of the precepts from the booklet The Way
to Happiness and then taking up what is assessed. The other
approach is simply to go straight forward from square one
and proceed step by step through the booklet.
The straightforward method is used in the normal course of
auditing a pc through the rundown. The assessment method
has proven to be most useful in repair of a bugged HRD,
where a charged precept or precepts need to be located for
handling.
The full tech of the procedure and use of these two methods
is given in HCOB 18 Jan. 84, HRD Series 3, HOW TO AUDIT THE
HRD.
BASIC PROCEDURE
The basic steps of the HRD procedure follow:
A. Clean up the word "moral." Get it defined. Get off any
false data on it, if there. Two-way comm it and get it to F/N.
B. Take up each numbered section of the booklet from precept
number 1 forward, in sequence, and do the following steps:
1. Read the precept (done by pc).
2. Clean up any Mis-U word in it.
3. Pc reads the section.
4. Clear up any Mis-U word in the section.
5. Look for and clear up any false data the pc may have for
that precept.
6 . The transgressions of others (general) against that
precept. Two-way comm. Don't make it a listing question.
E/S it to F/N.
7 . The transgressions of oneself against that precept.
Two-way comm, earlier-similar to F/N. Don't make it a
listing question. Don't miss any W/Hs even though this
is only a cousin to O/W. E/S to F/N.
8. See if the pc spots another specific person in his or
her past who really transgressed against the precept. Treat
it more like Straightwire: an exact moment the person was
transgressing. A light auditor can get the valence to
spring apart just by doing that and without plowing the
person into an engram. Alternate for this step: an overt
the pc did against the person. The object of the step is to
get the valence sprung out (separated from the pc).
9. Check if the person now has any reservations about
keeping the precept.
Handle with two-way comm (one of the above steps might have been
missed if the person has reservations). Get it to F/N.
10. Check any reservations on getting someone else to keep
it. If any, handle as a problem and E/S to F/N.
Precept 17-2 (Learn) starts with a very hot question, and a
special handling has been readied to drain any charge off
it. Be careful not to try to give somebody a full study
tech rundown when doing this rundown. If it is very boggy,
get it to F/Ning some way and advise Method One Word
Clearing. It is a bit off the purpose and EP of the rundown
but it might be run into, so there is a handling for it if
it is.
Number 19 ("Try not to do things to others that you would
not like them to do to you") will get into overts. It may
get into shame, blame and regret. Its EP is really to teach
someone what a harmful act is, not to give them a full O/W
handling. And remember one can miss W/Hs on this step
particularly.
Number 20 ("Try to treat others as you would like them to
treat you") has a different handling. One simply does steps
1-4 as usual. But then one gets the person to imagine being
treated in this fashion for each of the items. Then, virtue
by virtue, take up treating another and others in that
fashion; clean up any reservations to the pc's
satisfaction. One or more of these items may be charged
either on being treated that way or treating others in that
way. Just handle with two-way comm. Then re-read Precept 20
to get any reservations off. An object here is to give a
reality on what good behavior is. That's the real EP of
number 20.
There is a definite possibility that one will run into
spoken disagreement with the precept anywhere up to step 5
(false data handling). The false data steps might handle
it. The other steps may do so. It needn't be given any
special attention as, truth told, people who do not live
moral lives don't because of material which will be
uncovered in the original ten steps. A caution should be
given any auditor doing this rundown that a flare-up
probably means a missed withhold. If it were to block the
session, one would have to pull it.
There is a final epilogue in the book. This is also taken
up in the rundown.
If a roaring EP does not occur because of the rundown, then
one of two things has occurred: One has overrun it (or
introduced auditing faults) and smothered the EP.
Or the rundown is not complete and should be started again
from the top, as something has been overlooked. Thus, where
the rundown does not result in an EP, one either repairs it
or does it again, as directed by the C/S.
The full list of commands for the rundown is given in HCOB
19 Jan. 84, HRD Series 4, HAPPINESS RUNDOWN COMMAND SHEETS.
Further data on the HRD procedure is in HCOB 18 Jan. 84,
HRD Series 3, HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
133. HCOB 18 JAN 84 HRD Ser 3 HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 JANUARY 1984
Remimeo
HRD Checksheets
HRD Auditors
HRD C/Ses
Pc Examiners
Qual Div Personnel
Happiness Rundown Series 3
HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD
Refs:
Booklet: The Way to Happiness
HCOB 16 Jan. 84R HRD Series 1R Rev. 20.7.88 THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
HCOB 17 Jan. 84 HRD Series 2 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS
HCOB 23 June 80RA CHECKING QUESTIONS ON GRADES Rev. 25.10.83 PROCESSES
HCOB 27 May 70R UNREADING QUESTIONS AND ITEMS Rev. 3.12.78
HCOB 8 June 61R Rev. 22.2.79 E-METER WATCHING-ARE YOU WAITING
FOR THE METER TO PLAY DIXIE?
HCOB 28 Sept.82 C/S Series 115 MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS
HCOB 13 Oct. 82 C/S Series 116 ETHICS AND THE C/S
HCOB 7 Aug. 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING
HCOB 15 Jan. 84 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN ADDITIVES
HCOB 20 Jan. 84 HRD Series 4-1 HRD PRECEPTS ASSESSMENT LIST
The Happiness Rundown consists of a precise series of steps.
Provided the HRD HCOBs are well studied in theory and in
practical, and provided that the HRD procedure is followed
exactly by the C/S and auditor, the HRD is very easy to audit
and C/S, and can result in spectacular gains for the pc.
AUDITOR QUALIFICATIONS
In order to audit the HRD one must be a Class IV Auditor,
trained on the HRD Auditor's Course. These qualifications
ensure that the auditor is capable of handling the majority
of situations and actions that may arise in the course of
the HRD without having to call in a higher-classed auditor.
PROCEDURE
Once any needed setups are completed as programed by the
C/S, the rundown is begun, starting from the top of the
command sheets and carrying on through them step by step. A
copy of the command sheets is kept in the pc's folder and
used in each session. The auditor notes the number of each
command or step on the worksheet as he gives it, and marks
it off on the command sheet when it is completed.
The pc should not be left in the middle of a precept at the
end of a session. All of the steps for the precept being
handled should be complete before ending off.
Several precepts can be handled in one session.
Probably the first caution in applying the rundown is not
to go past cognitions (and F/Ns) on a particular moral. And
don't overrun F/Ns. If you get a persistent F/N, end off
the session and pick up the rundown later. If you get a
roaring EP, then that's it for the rundown.
USE OF THE METER
It has always been a basic rule in formal auditing that ONE
DOES NOT RUN UNREADING AUDITING QUESTIONS OR ITEMS. This is
well covered in HCOB 23 June 80RA, CHECKING QUESTIONS ON
GRADES PROCESSES, and the issues it refers to.
All of the auditing questions on the rundown are checked
for a read. There are some steps which are not "auditing
questions" as such, e.g., having the pc read the precept.
There are questions in the rundown which ask for false
data, and these are not tested for read. I found years ago,
in the original research on the tech now known as False
Data Stripping, that a question designed to locate false
data will not necessarily read on the meter. This is
because the person believes the data to be true. (Ref: HCOB
7 Aug. 79, FALSE DATA STRIPPING)
There are a few questions in the procedure which ask for
misunderstood words.
These do not have to read for a pc to answer them, but any
auditor should certainly be alert for an instant read on a
word clearing question and would be remiss not to follow up
on such a read. An instant read on a question such as "Do
you have any misunderstoods on ?" means that there is
something there to be cleaned up. (Ref: HCOB 22 Feb. 72RA,
Word Clearing Series 32RA, WORD CLEARING METHOD 4)
VALENCE SEPARATION STEPS
There are several points that should be noted (and well
drilled) with regard to the valence handling steps of the
rundown, steps 8a through 8f.
1. Once you have gotten a reading terminal to run with
question 8a ("Is there any specific person in your past who
really transgressed against the precept _____?"), the subsequent
steps are not checked for read. You are using these steps to
lightly get the pc separated out from the valence he has been in.
2. Should the pc give more than one terminal in response to
the first question (8a), take down each terminal that he
gives, noting reads. Handle them in order of longest read.
Be alert for a pc starting to list on the question and be
prepared to handle with L&N tech. This has not proven to be
a frequent occurrence at all, but it should not be
discounted as a possibility. (Ref: HCOB 17 Mar. 74, TWO-WAY
COMM, USING WRONG QUESTIONS)
Note: If the pc should come up with the answer "me" in
response to question 8a, the answer is accepted, but this
item would not be run in the valence separation steps.
(Ref: HCOB 19 Nov. 78, L&N LISTS-THE ITEM "ME") If the pc has other
reading answers for the question, they are handled as usual.
PRECEPT 20
Precept 20 ("Try to Treat Others as You Would Want Them to
Treat You") has a special handling. After going through the
usual steps of reading and word clearing the precept, the
auditor has the pc imagine being treated by others
according to each virtue in turn (step 20, 5), and has him
tell how he imagined it. If the pc has some charge on a
virtue or virtues (either on treating others or on being
treated that way), simply handle it with two-way comm. Once
the pc has done each of these imagining steps, have him
reread the precept and get off any reservations he may have
on it with the usual steps 9 and 10 of the basic procedure
(reservations the pc has about applying the precept and
reservations on getting others to apply it). What you want
to achieve for the pc is a reality on what good behavior is.
ASSESSMENT METHOD
As mentioned in HRD Series 2, HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS, there
is a second method of auditing the HRD - by assessment of the
precepts in the booklet The Way to Happiness and handling
the reading precept or precepts (in order of longest read)
using the basic HRD procedure.
The assessment method is used in repair of the rundown and
appears in several of the handlings on the HRD Repair List.
It is used to locate charged precepts so that these can be
taken up and handled.
The HRD Auditor must be proficient in the use of both the
straightforward method and assessment method.
The procedure for doing the assessment method follows:
1 . Use the prepared assessment list of all the precepts
and subprecepts, HCOB 20 Jan. 84, HRD Series 4-1, HRD
PRECEPTS ASSESSMENT LIST.
2. In session, clear all the words that appear on the
assessment list with the pc. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II,
CLEARING COMMANDS)
3. Assess the list straight through to the end, noting all
reads.
4. Take up the longest reading precept or subprecept and
handle it using the basic 110 steps of the HRD procedure.
5. Continue to handle the reading precepts in order of
length of reads until all that read are handled.
END PHENOMENA
The object of the HRD is:
1. To clear up any confusions on the subject of morals;
2. To clean up any and all transgression against the
specific morals laid out in the booklet The Way to Happiness;
3. To slide the person out of the valence of any immoral
person; and
4. To obtain an EP of realization/cognition that one really
is on the Way to Happiness.
The rundown steers the person in a direction where he is
certain he can live a happier life. Once the above is
achieved-and in most cases it is quite a roaring EP- the
rundown is ended off and the pc C/Sed to declare to its
completion. The EP can occur before the entire booklet has
been run through, but this is not common. It may require
more than one run through the booklet to achieve the EP
fully, the pc making gradient gains all the while. (Ref:
HCOB 21 June 70, C/S Series 9, SUPERFICIAL ACTIONS)
At the Pc Examiner the pc attests to having realized that
he/she really is on the Way to Happiness.
TIPS
a. Command Sheets
It was soon learned during the pilot that if all the
questions and steps of the HRD were not numbered and laid
out in full, it was easy for the auditor to mistakenly omit
steps or lose his place on the steps or precepts. This is
why the commands are printed out in full in the command sheets.
b. Metering
It is expected that auditors will apply the tech on
detecting and handling false reads when handling HRD
questions, and not run questions that are not validly
reading. (Ref: HCOB 11 Sept. 68, FALSE READS and HCOB 6
Sept. 68, CHECKING FOR FALSE READS)
c. Valence Separation Steps
On the valence handling steps (8a through 8f) the pc may not
always specifically express that he has "separated out of the
valence of the person being run." Sometimes there is simply
an obvious key-out, F/N and VGIs. This point of procedure
bears drilling until the auditor can easily detect an EP
for these steps and knows when to end off on them. This
includes making it quite clear in one's worksheets what has
occurred so that the C/S can properly follow the progress
of the case and correct the auditor's procedure where needed.
d. Drilling
In order to be able to handle the questions on this or any
process or rundown that requires a read be checked for, the
auditor must be well drilled and proficient in the skill of
accurately determining whether a question is reading or
not. (Ref: HCOB 23 June 80RA, CHECKING QUESTIONS ON GRADES
PROCESSES) If this is not done, you and the pc are liable
to have a rough time of it, with missed reads, nonexistent
"reads" taken up, or endless "button checking," when you
had the intention to get some auditing done!
CAUTION
Do not fall prey to someone trying to use the revisions of
the procedure and EP of the HRD given in this HCOB as
license to quickie the rundown. These revisions are A
RESTORATION OF THE ORIGINAL BASIC STANDARD TECH OF THE
RUNDOWN. Ensuring that the pc is well set up for this major
action, insistence on standard auditing and C/Sing, and
accurate observation and evaluation of the case and
progress of the pc are essential. Only with these points in
can you assure that those receiving the HRD get all the
tremendous gains there to be had.
REMEDIES
The remedy for auditor errors on the HRD is to assess and
handle the Happiness Rundown Repair List (HRL).
When an HRL is done and the reads handled, the HRD can be
continued from where it was left off.
SUMMARY
The HRD is a very popular, highly successful rundown. Its
delivery requires competent auditors and C/Ses trained in
its procedures and skilled in the basics of auditing and
C/Sing. There are no particular "special tricks" to it-just
standard tech all the way. With these points in, the
Happiness Rundown can produce MIRACLES.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================