No matching fragments found in this document.
Date: 21 Aug 1999 01:20:44 -0000
Subject: FZ Bible NEW TECH VOL XII 01/17 (1980-4)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <0dcdace2524e561e54a12d80d2eaddbf@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1869
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!skynet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:899755 alt.clearing.technology:97259
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
NEW TECH VOL XII 01/17 (1980-4)
**************************************************
NEW TECH VOLUME XII 1980-84
(As issued in 1991 by CofS)
[A scan of this into Adobe Acrobat PDF format has been available
for a number of years now in the independent field. It was done
by an unknown source. The PDF version was renumbered Tech Vol XVI
to avoid conflict with freezone numbering systems but contains
identical contents to New Tech Volume XII. We converted this to
text for easy posting and distribution and verified the contents
against a hardcopy of Cof$ NTV XII. As with all fzba postings,
our version is adapted for easy onscreen reading and fast searching
with a text oriented search tool rather than printing.]
[Note that the New Tech Vols do not include material which was
cancelled or issued as BTBs. Any BTBs that remained in force
within CofS by 1991 had already been converted to HCOBs and
reprinted as being by LRH. Also, the new tech vols do not
contain a revision history. Pseudo tech volumes 13 and 14 as
posted by Zenon as part of the old tech volumes last year contain
much of the material of 1980 as it was originally issued but
do not cover 1981-4. The volume posted here covers 1980-4 in
its final revision as used within CofS in the 1990s.]
==================
[Because of its large size, the complete contents only appears
in part 0 and part 1.]
CONTENTS:
Part 1
001. HCOB 3 JAN 80RA r. 8 Aug 83 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR
002. HCOB 12 JAN 80 ART SERlES 9 To do a montage ...
003. HCOB 11 FEB 80R r. 18 Oct 86 ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF
004. HCOB 14 FEB 80R r. 31 Jul 85 RESEARCH DATA ON NUTR. VITAMIN INCREASES
005. HCOB 29 FEB 80 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN: PREGNANCY AND BREAST-FEEDING
006. HCOB 7 MAR 80 DIETS, COMMENTS UPON
007. HCOB 13 MAR 80RA r. 26 Jul 86 CONDITIONAL STEP AFTER THE PURIF
008. HCOB 5 APR 80 Q&A, THE REAL DEFINITION
009. HCOB 10 APR 80 AUDITOR BEINGNESS
010. HCOB 21 APR 80R r. 18 Oct 86 PC EXAMINER
Part 2
011. HCOB 22 APR 80R ASSESSMENT DRILLS
012. HCOB 29 APR 80R r. 26 Jul 86 PREPARED LISTS, THEIR VALUE AND PURPOSE
013. HCOB 3 MAY 80 PC INDICATORS
014. HCOB 12 MAY 80 DRUGS AND THE BACKTRACK
015. HCOB 18 MAY 80R r. 26 Jul 86 START-CHANGE-STOP COMMANDS
Part 3
016. HCOB 21 MAY 80 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN CASE DATA
017. HCOB 28 MAY 80RA r. 20 Apr 90 CO-AUDIT DEFINED
Part 4
018. HCOB 29 MAY 80RA r. 20 Apr 90 CO-AUDITS: HOW TO RUN THEM
019. HCOB 30 MAY 80RA SUPERVISING CO-AUDIT TRs
020. HCOB 31 MAY 80RA r. 21 Apr 90 STAFF CO-AUDITS
021. NOTE 1 JUN 80 RESEARCH & DISCOVERY SERIES
022. HCOB 19 JUN 80 THE AUDITOR'S CODE
023. HCOB 20 JUN 80 L1C WORD LIST
024. HCOB 22 JUN 80 INT RD CORRECTION LIST WORDS
025. HCOB 23 JUN 80RA r. 25 Oct 83 CHECKING QUESTIONS ON GRADES PROCESSES
026. HCOB 23 JUN 80RA r. 26 Jul 86 WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST WORDS
027. HCOB 28 JUN 80RA r. 18 Oct 86 STUDENT CORRECTION LIST WORDS
028. HCOB 30 JUN 80RA r. 26 May 88 STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST WORDS
Part 5
029. HCOB 12 JUN 80R r. 5 Nov 82 THE BASICS OF ETHICS
030. HCOB 23 JUL 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST - LCRE
031. HCOB 25 JUL 80RA r. 12 Jul 88 COURSE SUP. CORR. LIST WORD LIST
032. HCOB 29 JUL 80 CRIMINALS AND PSYCHIATRY
033. HCOB 30 JUL 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING
034. HCOB 2 SEP 80 REPAIR CORRECTION LIST WORDS
035. HCOB 11 SEP 80 L4BRB WORD LIST
036. HCOB 16 SEP 80R r. 4 Jul 88 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST WORD LIST
037. HCOB 17 SEP 80R r. 8 Apr 88 L3RH WORD LIST
038. HCOB 17 SEP 80RA r. 28 Jun 90 GREEN FORM WORD LIST
039. HCOB 28 SEP 80R r. 26 Jul 86 CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST-LCRE WORDS LIST
040. HCOB 6 OCT 80 GENERAL STAFF CONFESSIONAL LIST
041. HCOB 6 OCT 80 SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL LIST
Part 6
042. HCOB 23 OCT 80R r. 16 Nov 87 CHART OF ABILITIES GAINED
043. HCOB 4 NOV 80 PRD CONFESSIONAL LIST
044. HCOB 5 NOV 80 RETURNING TOURS CONFESSIONAL
045. HCOB 8 NOV 80R r. 26 Jul 86 C/S SERIES 53RM LONG FORM - WORD LIST
046. HCOB 12 NOV 80R r. 12 Jul 88 CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST
047. Attachment CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
048. HCOB 12 NOV 80 REGISTRAR AND SALES PERSONNEL CONFESSIONAL LIST
049. HCOB 18 NOV 80R AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST AUDITOR RECOVERY WORD LIST
050. HCOB 18 NOV 80R r. 12 Jul 88 CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST WORD LIST
051. HCOB 23 NOV 80 CASE SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL
052. HCOB 2 DEC 80 FLOATING NEEDLE AND TA POSITION MODIFIED
Part 7
053. HCOB 19 DEC 80R r. 16 Nov 87 REHAB TECH
054. HCOB 21 DEC 80RA r. 23 Apr 91 THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN
055. HCOB 23 DEC 80R r. 12 Jul 88 EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST
056. Attachment EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
Part 8
057. HCOB 23 DEC 80R r. 12 Jul 88 EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST - WORD LIST
058. HCOB 25 DEC 80 LRH COMMUNICATOR CONFESSIONAL LIST
059. HCOB 25 DEC 80 FLAG REP CONFESSIONAL LIST
060. HCOB 29 JAN 81RA r. 9 Apr 91 FES CHECKLISTS AND SUMMARY
061. Attachment 1 FES SUMMARY
062. Attachment 2 FES CHECKLIST FOR STARTING OR CONTINUING EXPANDED GRADES
063. Attachment 3 FES CHECKLIST FOR STARTING OR CONTINUING NED
064. Attachment 4 FES CHECKLIST FOR STARTING OR CONTINUING FPRD
065. Attachment 5 FES CHECKLIST FOR STARTING OR CONTINUING L10, L11 OR L12
066. HCOB 29 JAN 81 HC OUTPOINT-PLUSPOINT LISTS RB - WORDS LIST
Part 9
067. HCOB 13 FEB 81R r. 25 JUL 87 DICTIONARIES
068. HCOB 26 MAR 81R r. 4 Jul 88 EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RF WORD LIST
069. HCOB 31 MAR 81R r. 25 Apr 90 "HEAVY DRUG HISTORY" DEFINED
070. HCOB 1 APR 81R r. 17 Jan 91 INTERVIEWS
071. HCOB 10 APR 81R r. 7 Aug 83 REACH AND WITHDRAW
072. HCOB 4 MAY 81RA r. 27 Jun 88 STUDY GREEN FORM
Part 10
073. HCOB 5 MAY 81R r. 4 Jul 88 STUDY GREEN FORM WORD LIST
074. HCOB 23 JUL 81 PREGNANCY AND AUDITING
075. HCOB 29 JUL 81R r. 13 Apr 91 FULL ASSIST CHECKLISTS
076. Attachment #1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FOR INJURIES
077. Attachment #2 HANDLING SHEET FOR INJURIES
078. Attachment #3 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FOR ILLNESSES
079. Attachment #4 HANDLING SHEET FOR ILLNESSES
080. HCOB 15 SEP 81 THE CRIMINAL MIND
081. HCOB 6 OCT 81 TECH FILMS AND VERBAL TECH
082. HCOB 7 OCT 81R r. 30 Aug 83 METHOD 3 WORD CLEARING
Part 11
083. HCOB 8 OCT 81R r. 16 Jan 89 WORD CLEARING METHOD 2
084. HCOB 12 NOV 81RD r. 20 Apr 90 GRADE CHART STREAMLINED
085. HCOB 13 NOV 81 WHAT TONE 40 IS
086. HCOB 15 NOV 81R r. 18 DEC 88 THE SUNSHINE RUNDOWN
087. HCOB 29 NOV 81 DN AND SCN COMPARED TO NINETEENTH CENTURY PRACTICES
088. HCOB 5 DEC 81R r.7 OCT 84 SET UP AND USING A REEL-TO-REEL TAPE
089. HCOB 12 DEC 81 THE THEORY OF THE NEW GRADE CHART
090. HCOB 14 DEC 81 THE STATE OF CLEAR
091. HCOB 15 DEC 81 NEW GRADE CHART PC/PRE-OT PROGRAMING
092. HCOB 17 DEC 81 POST PURPOSE CLEARING REVIVED
093. HCOB 26 DEC 81 POST PURPOSE CLEARING FOR MGMT TEAMS AND EXECS
094. HCOB 19 JAN 82 HIGH SCHOOL INDOCTRINATION
095. HCOB 15 FEB 82 rel 20 Oct 86 FREEDOM OF SPEECH
096. HCOB 17 FEB 82 rel 20 Oct 86 PREJUDICE
097. HCOB 20 FEB 82 rel 20 Oct 86 OVERTS
098. HCOB 6 MAR 82R r. 10 Dec 88 CONFESSIONAL TECH POLICIES
099. HCOB 8 MAR 82R r. 24 Apr 83 CONFESSIONALS AND NON-INTERFERENCE ZONE
Part 12
100. HCOB 10 MAR 82 CONFESSIONALS - ETHICS REPORTS REQUIRED
101. Book MAR 82 UNDERSTANDING THE E-METER
102. HCOB 20 MAR 82R r. 12 Apr 88 STANDARDS
103. HCOB 25 MAR 82R r. 16 Apr 90 OBJECTIVES NOT BITING
104. HCOB 31 MAR 82R r. 29 Dec 88 BASIC STUDY MISSED WITHHOLD
105. HCOB 11 APR 82 SEC CHECKING IMPLANTS
106. HCOB 13 APR 82 STILL NEEDLE AND CONFESSIONALS
107. HCOB 16 APR 82 MORE ON PTS HANDLING
108. HCOB 26 APR 82 THE CRIMINAL MIND AND THE PSYCHS
109. HCOB 6 MAY 82 THE CAUSE OF CRIME
110. HCOB 10 MAY 82 OT LEVELS
111. HCOB 11 JUL 82 QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST
112. HCOB 11 JUL 82 QUESTIONABLE AUDITING
113. HCOB 10 AUG 82 OT MAXIMS
114. HCOB 25 AUG 82 Art Series 10 THE JOY OF CREATING
115. HCOB 26 AUG 82 PAIN AND SEX
116. HCOB 28 SEP 82 C/S Ser 115 MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS
117. HCOB 13 OCT 82 C/S Ser 116 ETHICS AND THE C/S
118. HCOB 27 DEC 82 TRAINING AND OT
119. HCOB 8 MAR 83 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
Part 13
120. HCOB 12 APR 83 LIST OF KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING SERIES
121. HCOB 3 MAY 83 C/S Ser 117 WHO OR WHAT IS A "C/S"?
122. HCOB 7 AUG 83 ROBOTIC TRs
123. HCOB 8 AUG 83 CYCLING THROUGH TRs
124. HCOB 19 AUG 83 OT III COURSE POSH-UP
125. HCOB 27 AUG 83 WC Ser 69 WORDS AND ASSOCIATIONS
126. HCOB 10 SEP 83 PTSness AND DISCONNECTION
127. HCOB 23 OCT 83 SEC CHECKING: NOTE
128. HCOB 3 JAN 84 Purif Ser 7 RADIATION AND LIQUIDS
129. HCOB 10 JAN 84 Study Ser 12 THE USE OF DEMONSTRATION
130. HCOB 16 JAN 84RA HRD Ser 1RA THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
131. HCOB 16 JAN 84 Cram Ser 17 REPAIR OF PAST CRAMMING
132. HCOB 17 JAN 84 HRD Ser 2 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN BASICS
133. HCOB 18 JAN 84 HRD Ser 3 HOW TO AUDIT THE HRD
Part 14
134. HCOB 19 JAN 84 HRD Ser 4 HAPPINESS RUNDOWN COMMAND SHEETS
Part 15
135. HCOB 20 JAN 84 HRD Ser 4-1 HRD PRECEPTS ASSESSMENT LIST
136. HCOB 21 JAN 84R r. 20 Jul 88 HRD Ser 5RA HRD REPAIR LIST (HRL)
137. HCOB 27 JUN 89 HRD Ser 6RA C/Sing THE HAPPINESS RUNDOWN
138. HCOB 21 JAN 84R r. 20 Jul 88 HRD Ser 7R DELIVERY OF THE HRD
139. HCOB 23 JAN 84 DRUG RUNDOWNS AND RADIATION
140. HCOB 27 JAN 84 FSM BREAKTHROUGH, NEW FSM TRs
141. HCOB 1 FEB 84 Art Ser 11 HOW TO VIEW ART
142. HCOB 25 FEB 84 Art Ser 13 DEPTH PERSPECTIVE
143. HCOB 26 FEB 84 Art Ser 14 COLOR
144. HCOB 26 FEB 84 Art Ser 15 ART AND INTEGRATION
145. HCOB 28 FEB 84 C/S Ser 118 PRETENDED PTS
Part 16
146. HCOB 2 MAR 84R r. 24 Apr 90 O/W WRITE-UPS
147. HCOB 10 MAR 84 Art Ser 16 MESSAGE
148. HCOB 10 MAR 84 Purif Ser 8 OILS CAN GO RANCID
149. HCOB 27 MAR 84 C/S Ser 119 STALLED DIANETIC CLEAR: SOLVED
150. HCOB 5 JUN 84R r. 11 Jan 90 FPRD 1R FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
151. HCOB 6 JUN 84 ROCK SLAMS, MORE ABOUT
152. HCOB 6 JUN 84 "MURDER ROUTINE"
153. HCOB 6 JUN 84 MISSED WITHHOLD HANDLING
154. HCOB 6 JUN 84R r. 12 Jan 90 FPRD 2R THE "LOST TECH" OF HANDLING...
155. HCOB 7 JUN 84 FPRD 3 THE PRIOR CONFUSION
156. HCOB 8 JUN 84 FPRD 4 CLEARING JUSTIFICATIONS
157. HCOB 9 JUN 84R r.3 May 85 FPRD 5R AUDITING THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
158. HCOB 10 JUN 84 FPRD 6 FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN COMMANDS
Part 17
159. HCOB 11 JUN 84 FPRD 7 C/Sing THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
160. HCOB 12 JUN 84 FPRD 8 FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN AUDITOR ERRORS
161. HCOB 13 JUN 84R r.1 Aug 90 FPRD 9R FPRD CORRECTION LIST
162. HCOB 14 JUN 84 FPRD 10-A FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN BASIC FORM
163. HCOB 15 JUN 84 FPRD INFO FOR ORGS AND MISSIONS
164. HCOB 17 JUN 84 C/S Ser 118-1 EVIL PURPOSES AND FALSE PR
165. Books SEP 84 PURIF DELIVERY MANUAL etc.
166. HCOB 8 NOV 84R r. 18 Jun 89 SECURITY CHECKER BEINGNESS
167. HCOB 22 NOV 84 FPRD 9-1 FPRD CORR LIST - WORD LIST
end of volume
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
==================
The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology
by L. Ron Hubbard
FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
Volume XVI 1980-1984
==================
I will not always be here on guard.
The stars twinkle in the Milky Way
And the wind sighs for songs
Across the empty fields of a planet
A Galaxy away.
You won't always be here.
But before you go,
Whisper this to your sons
And their sons -
"The work was free.
Keep it so."
L. RON HUBBARD
==================
001. HCOB 3 JAN 80RA r. 8 Aug 83 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1980RA
REVISED 8 AUGUST 1983
Remimeo
All Staff
BPI
Purification Rundown Series 3
PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR
(This data is released as a record of researches and results
noted. It cannot be construed as a recommendation of
medical treatment or medication and it is undertaken or
delivered by anyone on his own responsibility. It is a
contribution to scientific thought.)
Refs:
HCOB 6 Feb. 78RB Purif RD Series 1R Rev. 21.4.83
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
PAB 74, 6 Mar. 56 OFFICE IN IRELAND
Ahility 47, ca. mid-May 1957, THE RADIATION PICTURE AND SCIENTOLOGY
HCOB 3 June 57 EXPLANATION OF ABERRATIVE CHARACTER OF RADIATION
PAB 119, 1 Sept. 57 THE BIG AUDITING PROBLEM
HCOB 27 Dec. 65 VITAMINS
Book: All About Radiation
I want Scientologists to live through World War III.
Atomic war has been more or less neglected as a news
subject since the late 50s.
But that doesn't make it any less a threat. All it takes is
one psychopath politician with access to the war-peace
button. And today there are a dozen atomic-armed nations.
Further, the increased use of atomic power for electrical
supply (without also developing proper tech and safeguards
in its use) poses a nonmilitary threat.
And the deterioration of the upper atmosphere of the
planet, by jets and pollutants, is year by year letting
more and more sun radiation through to the planetary surface.
Radiation causes a cumulative effect. And, like an engram,
has earliersimilars back to a basic engram. The more one is
exposed to radiation, the less resistance he has and the
more effect the radiation has on him. In other words, a
build-up occurs.
The primary purpose of the Purification Rundown is to
handle drugs and toxic substances accumulated in the body,
and according to the success stories pouring in, it
certainly does that.
One of the parts of the Purification Rundown is niacin. The
discoveries I made with this vitamin in the 50s began with
its apparent effect on radiation exposure. At that time
there was a lot of bomb testing and general radiation
exposure and we had lots and lots of preclears who had been
subjected to atomic tests, atomic accidents and, in at
least one case, to materials that had been part of an old
atomic explosion.
We were engaged in salvaging these people and we succeeded.
As radiation is cumulative, once one has gotten rid of the
cumulative effect of it, one would be far less subject to
new blasts of it. In other words, once a basic has been run
out or handled, new incidents of a similar kind become very
minor. While one is not made wholly immune to new
incidents, he is far less affected by them.
Completely aside from the physical resurgence experienced
in the Purification Rundown when properly and fully done,
there is this side-benefit of lessening the consequences of
future radiation exposure.
Bombarded by radiation from atomic plant fallout, from
lessened atmosphere protection, people today are far more
subject to being victims in the time of atomic war. The
cumulative effect of radiation has set them up to a rapid
demise in the face of heavy atomic fallout.
That brings us to the interesting probability that those
who have had a full and competent Purification Rundown will
survive where others not so fortunate won't.
And that poses the interesting possibility that only
Scientologists will be functioning in areas experiencing
heavy fallout in an atomic war.
Also, they'll know how to recover from a new
exposure - another short use of niacin. And a bit of
auditing, of course.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
002. HCOB 12 JAN 80 ART SERlES 9 To do a montage ...
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JANUARY 1980
Remimeo
ART SERlES 9
To do a montage, shot or work of art that talks one must:
1. Figure out what your message is.
2. Decide to communicate the message.
3. Put things or arrangements in that contribute to the message.
4. Take out or exclude things or arrangements which don't
contribute to it.
It also helps to know what is meant by "message."
(Definition: Message is a unit communication of a
significance.)
It also helps to know the definition of "montage," which is
a series of shots with one message.
One should also know the definition of a shot and should
understand that a short cut or glimpse of something is just
a blip or some frames as opposed to a scene or a "picture,"
and there is really a missing word for this in the English
language.
A scene is a picture with a message in its own right.
A shot is anything and it has no message in its own right
and doesn't talk unless connected to other shots or scenes.
One should also know what is a sequence and what is an
action sequence.
A sequence is a series of scenes related by location or
general subject. In films or a photo story it is comparable
to a chapter in a book.
An action sequence is often fast cut to give the appearance
of rapid movement and will never be a montage, as each
picture in it is a scene and therefore has its own message.
Individual shots in a montage have little meaning in
themselves individually but when cut together deliver a
single message.
By confusing an action sequence and a montage or a montage
shot and a scene, one gets very little audience reaction
and after all, that's the name of the game.
Doing things for self-satisfaction is for professors who can't.
All of this comes under the heading of integration.
Integration consists of uniting the similar.
If you try to unite the totally dissimilar and unrelated,
you don't have integration and you don't have art. You have
chaos.
The principle of integration applies to all editing and
composition in all fields.
The above 1, 2, 3 and 4 is a formula that helps one to
achieve clear aesthetic communication of art.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
003. HCOB 11 FEB 80R r. 18 Oct 86 ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 FEBRUARY 1980R
REVISED 18 OCTOBER 1986
(Also issued as HCO PL 11 Feb 80R, same title)
Remimeo
All Registrars
All Case Supervisors
All Auditors
All Ethics Officers
Dept of Special Affairs
Purification Rundown Series 12
ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF
ADDITION REGARDING PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
Refs:
HCOB/PL 6 Dec. 76RB ILLEGAL PCS, ACCEPTANCE OF
Rev. 8.4.88 HIGH CRIME BULLETIN
HCOB 6 Feb. 78RC Purif RD Series 1
Rev. 31.7.85 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
The Church policy concerning illegal pcs, HCOB/PL 6 Dec. 76RB,
ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF, HIGH CRIME BULLETIN, applies to the
Purification Rundown just as it does to all processing services.
While cases who have been damaged by psychiatry could
possibly benefit from the Purification Rundown, it would
have to be administered under clinical conditions and
medical supervision and at the signed responsibility of
those responsible for the case. Such cases could not be
included in the general normal run of persons undergoing
the Purification Rundown.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
004. HCOB 14 FEB 80R r. 31 Jul 85 RESEARCH DATA ON NUTR. VITAMIN INCREASES
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 FEBRUARY 1980R
REVISED 31 JULY 1985
(Note All mineral and vitamin research was done
under medical supervision.)
Remimeo
All Orgs
All Missions
C/S Hats
Purif Admin
l/C Hats
Purification Rundown Series 4
RESEARCH DATA ON NUTRITIONAL VITAMIN INCREASES
ON THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
Refs:
HCOB 6 Feb. 78RB Purif RD Series 1
Rev. 21.4.83 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
HCOB 3 Jan. 80RA Purif RD Series 3
Rev. 8.8.83 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR
HCOB 3 Jan. 84 Purif RD Series 7 RADIATION AND LIQUIDS
(This data is released as a record of researches and results
noted. It cannot be construed as a recommendation of medical
treatment or medication and it is undertaken by anyone on his
own responsibility.)
The basic bulletin on the Purification Rundown (HCOB 6 Feb.
78RB, Purif RD Series 1, THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE
SWEAT PROGRAM) contains, as a record of researches and results,
the approximate daily amounts of the various vitamins and
minerals on which most persons are started on the rundown.
These beginning dosages are listed below:
NIACIN: 100 mg (or less, depending upon
individual tolerance at the start).
VITAMIN A: approximately 5000 IU.
VITAMIN D: approximately 400 IU.
VITAMIN C: approximately 250-1000 mg, depending upon individual
tolerance.
VITAMIN E: approximately 800 IU.
VITAMIN B1: 250-500 mg.
VITAMIN B approximately 2 tablets per day,
COMPLEX: containing the same amounts of B2 and B6.
CAL-MAG: at least one glass daily, and a multi-mineral tablet con
taining a balanced combination of multi-minerals.
Vitamin B Complex: The vitamin B-complex tablet that was
used in the original Purification Rundown research was one
which contained:
B1 - 50 mg. Folic Acid - 100 mcg.
B2 - 50 mg. Biotin - 50 mcg.
B6 - 50 mg. Choline - 50 mg.
B12 - 50 mcg. Niacinamide - 50 mg.
Pantothenic Acid - 50 mg. Inositol - 50 mg.
PABA - 50 mg.
all in a base of lecithin, parsley, rice bran, watercress
and alfalfa.
The same tablet or one with similar content is still used
very successfully in delivering the Purification Rundown.
(Special Note on Niacinamide: The majority of vitamin
B-complex tablets on the market include niacinamide in
small amounts, which is the substance invented by someone
to keep an individual from turning on a niacin flush.
Therefore, as such, niacinamide is worthless. The
likelihood is that this amount of niacinamide in a
B-complex tablet acts only upon the niacin content in that
specific tablet to eliminate any flush caused by its own
niacin content. Results from the piloting of the rundown,
where plenty of niacin flush was experienced on different
dosages of niacin itself [in combination with the flanking
vitamins and minerals], indicate that the inclusion of
niacinamide in the B complex had little if any effect upon
the flush that resulted from the additional dosages of
niacin taken. However, where a B-complex tablet can be
found that includes niacin rather than niacinamide, that
would be the preferable tablet to use. It is also possible
to have a B-complex tablet especially made up that includes
actual niacin, INSTEAD OF niacinamide, in amounts equal to
the Bl and B6 amounts, particularly if one is ordering it
in fairly large amounts. Note: Where a B-complex tablet
that includes niacin is used, this adds that much more to
the daily niacin intake and this must be taken into
consideration when increasing niacin and B-complex dosages.)
Mineral Tablet: The multi-mineral tablet used contains the
following mineral amounts per each 9 tablets. In other
words, one tablet would provide only l/g of the following
mineral amounts:
500 mg calcium
250 mg magnesium
18 mg iron
15 mg zinc
4 mg manganese
2 mg copper
45 mg potassium (protein complex)
.225 mg iodine (kelp).
In the tablet used, the minerals, except the potassium and
the iodine, are "chelated"* (bonded with) super amino
acids* in a base of selenium, yeast, DNA, RNA, ginseng,
alfalfa leaf flour, parsley, watercress and cabbage.
*chelation: is taken from a Greek word meaning "claw." It
is a process by which minerals are held, as
if by a claw, by amino acids. This bonding of a mineral
with an amino acid exists in nature as a necessary step for
the mineral to be absorbed and used by the body. Thus, with
this step already provided, the mineral is more easily
absorbed and used.
*amino acids: to define them very simply, are basic organic
compounds which are essential to the
body's breakdown and absorption of foods.
In the original Purification Rundown research,
multi-mineral dosages were started at 1 to 2 tablets daily.
Then, as the niacin and other vitamins were increased in
proportion to each other, the mineral dosages were
increased accordingly in increments of 2 to 3 tablets, 4 to
5 tablets and 5 to 6 tablets.
FURTHER RESEARCH HAS SINCE INDICATED THAT, DUE TO THE
LARGE AMOUNTS OF MINERALS LOST IN SWEATING IN THE SAUNA,
HIGHER DOSAGES OF MINERALS GIVE MOST OPTIMUM RESULTS. (Ref:
HCOB 3 Jan. 84, Purif RD Series 7, RADIATION AND LIQUIDS)
PROPORTIONATE VITAMIN/MINERAL INCREASES
The tables below provide the most current research data on
approximately how the vitamins and minerals have been
increased, in ratio, when the niacin was increased as the
person progressed on the rundown.
The dosages in these tables show the variations of
individual tolerances encountered and the ranges of
increase which have proven most effective in the majority
of cases.
VITAMIN TABLE
This table shows proportionate vitamin increases at various
stages of the Rundown.
Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage
1 2 3 4 5
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
NIACIN 100 to 500 to 1500 to 2500 to 3500 to
400 1400 2400 3400 5000
mg. mg. mg. mg. mg.
VITAMIN A 5000 to 20,000 30,000 50,000 50,000
10,000 IU IU IU IU IU
VITAMIN D 400 800 1200 2000 2000
IU IU IU IU IU
VITAMIN C 250 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5 to
1000 mg. 3 gm. 4 gm. 5 gm. 6 gm.
VITAMIN E 800 1200 1600 2000 2400
IU IU IU IU IU
VITAMIN B 2 3 4 5 6
COMPLEX tablets tablets tablets tablets tablets
VITAMIN B1 350 to 400 to 450 to 750 to 800 to
600 650 700 1250 1300
mg. mg. mg. mg. mg.
MINERAL TABLE
The following table shows the approximate mineral amounts
which appear to give best results at the various stages of
vitamin increase.
Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage
1 2 3 4 5
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(All figures in milligrams except those for Cal-Mag)
CALCIUM 500 to 1000 to 1500 to 2000 to 2500 to
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
MAGNESIUM 250 to 500 to 750 to 1000 to 1250 to
500 750 1000 1250 I500
IRON 18-36 36-54 54-72 72-90 90-108
ZINC 15-30 30-45 45-60 60-75 75-90
MANGANESE 4-8 8-12 12-16 16-20 20-24
COPPER 2-4 4-6 6-8 8-10 10-12
POTASSIUM 45-90 90-135 135-180 180-225 225-270
IODINE .225 to .450 to .675 to .900 to 1.125 to
.450 .675 .900 1.125 1.350
CAL-MAG 1 - 1 1/2 1 - 2 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 3
glasses glasses glasses glasses glasses
____________
(Note: The number of mineral tablets to be taken would
depend upon the strength of the particular tablet used. The
importance is that one gets the necessary amounts of the
minerals. It has been found that large tablets may not be
as easily broken down and absorbed into the body as smaller
tablets may be. Thus, one might not get the same amount of
minerals from a large tablet as from several smaller
tablets even though the large tablet might contain the same
amount of minerals.)
HOW TO READ THE TABLES
As a clarification, first of all, the figures on these
tables designating points of increase (stages l, 2, 3, 4
and 5) do NOT refer to the first, second, third, fourth and
fifth days of the rundown. They refer to approximate
"stages" of vitamin and mineral increase (in relation to
the niacin increase) that an individual goes through on the
rundown.
On the vitamin table, under stage 1, the first figure given
for each vitamin shows the usual starting dosage of that
vitamin used for most individuals. The range then shown
under stage l indicates how these starting dosages may be
increased within a few days or within a week or so,
depending upon the niacin reaction the person is experiencing.
On the mineral table. under stage 1, the first column of
figures (reading downward) gives the usual starting mineral
dosages for most individuals. The range under stage 1 shows
the possible rate of mineral increase during this first
phase of the rundown.
The same applies to the increments shown at stages 2, 3, 4
and 5 on both tables.
EXAMPLE:
Person A starts the rundown on 100 mg of niacin plus the
other beginning increments of vitamins, per the vitamin
table. His beginning increments of minerals, per the
mineral table, are approximately: calcium 500 mg; magnesium
250 mg; iron 18 mg; zinc 15 mg; manganese 4 mg; copper 2
mg; potassium 45 mg and iodine .225 mg.
He continues with these daily dosages until the niacin
effects have diminished - in his case this occurs on, let us
say, the third day of the rundown. At that point his niacin
dosage is increased to 200 mg daily, with the other daily
vitamins and minerals increased proportionately, and he
continues on those dosages until the niacin effects have
diminished. Progressing in this way, by the seventh day of
the rundown his vitamin and mineral dosages have been
increased up to the levels given in stage 2 of the tables.
After the ninth day, his vitamins and minerals may have
been increased all the way up to stage 3 as shown on the
tables. And he continues in this way all the way up through
the levels of dosages at stage 5.
This varies from one individual to the next.
Person B, for example, starts on 100 mg of niacin and the
accompanying
vitamin and mineral dosages, and may then require a week or
more to work up to the levels of vitamin and mineral
dosages shown at stage 2. He may then move rapidly through
stage 2, take another week to move through stage 3 and
actually complete the rundown at some point on stage 4.
There is no rote pattern to be followed. It is totally a
matter of standardly applying the data given as to when the
niacin should be increased. (Ref: HCOB 6 Feb. 78RB, Rev. 21.4.83,
Purif RD Series 1, THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT
PROGRAM) That is the factor that may vary widely from one
individual to the next.
The tables above, however, show the guidelines which were
followed, per the most recent research, for increasing the
vitamin and mineral increments proportionately at the times
the niacin was increased.
ADDITIONAL NOTES ON VITAMINS AND MINERALS
It should be stressed here that individual tolerances were
and always must be taken into consideration in each case.
Quantities of vitamin C especially would need to be
carefully increased according to the person's tolerance of
it, as too much vitamin C can result in stomach upsets or
diarrhea for some people.
Additionally, vitamins and minerals should NOT be taken on
an empty stomach, as they could cause stomach burn. They
should be taken after meals or, if taken between meals,
with yogurt.
Most multiple mineral formulas include the major mineral
elements required by the body but not all of the trace
minerals.
"Trace" minerals are those minerals which have been found
essential to
maintaining life, even though they are found in the body in
very small-i.e., "trace"- amounts.
The main trace minerals currently include cobalt, copper,
iodine, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, selenium and chromium.
Tin was also added as an essential trace mineral as late as
1970.
Nutritional researchists are the first to admit that the
work in this field is very far from complete, and there
will undoubtedly be other trace minerals added to the list
as such research is continued.
Currently, also, there are fairly wide differences of
opinion among nutritionists as to the minimum daily
requirements of the various minerals and especially the
trace minerals.
Minerals are found in a wide variety of foods. Natural
foods, undamaged by processing, are the best sources of
minerals as they exist in unprocessed foods in the
combinations in which they are most effective. But minerals
can also be lacking in foods grown in mineral-depleted
soil. Additionally, of course, there is no one food that
supplies them all.
Therefore, it may be necessary to use more than one type of
multi-mineral tablet to ensure one is getting all of the
minerals, including the trace minerals, that are required
by the body.
Note: These vitamin and mineral tables do not include any
additional vitamins or minerals which might be needed in
cases of specific deficiencies an individual might have.
Any such particular deficiency would need to be determined
by a medical doctor and remedied with the additional
vitamin or mineral dosages recommended.
____________
Four of the more informative books on the subject of
nutritional vitamins and minerals are the following by
Adelle Davis: Let's Get Well, Let's Eat Right to Keep Fit,
Let's Cook It Right and Let's Have Healthy Children.
____________
The additional research data released in this issue is not
to be construed as a recommendation of medical treatment or
medication. It is given here as a record of food
supplements in the form of nutritional vitamins and
minerals which appeared to be effective in the piloting and
development of the Purification Rundown.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Compilation assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
005. HCOB 29 FEB 80 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN: PREGNANCY AND BREAST-FEEDING
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 FEBRUARY 1980
Remimeo
Purification Rundown Series 6
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN:
PREGNANCY AND BREAST-FEEDING
Refs:
HCOB 6 Feb. 78RA Purif RD Series 1 Rev. 4.12.79 THE PURIFICATION
RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
Book: Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health
Pregnant women should not be routed onto the Purification Rundown.
During pregnancy there is a certain amount of fluid
exchange between the mother and the fetus, via the
placenta. It has been found that on the Purification
Rundown, toxins which might have been lying dormant in the
body are released and eliminated via sweat-out. In the case
of pregnancy, some of these toxins, instead of being
eliminated, could be transmitted to the fetus in a flow of
fluids from the mother to the unborn child. There is no
reason to risk the possibility of subjecting the unborn
child to the effects of such toxins which, even if present
but remaining dormant, might not otherwise reach him.
Similarly, mothers who are breast-feeding their babies
should not do the Purification Rundown until the baby is no
longer being breast-fed, as any toxins released during the
rundown could be imparted to the baby in the mother's milk.
The Purification Rundown would be done by the mother after
the birth of the child and after any final medical check
which pronounced the mother in good health, and, in the
case of breast-feeding, when the baby had been completely
weaned and was on his own formula.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
006. HCOB 7 MAR 80 DIETS, COMMENTS UPON
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1980
Remimeo
DIETS, COMMENTS UPON
(Nothing in this HCOB should be interpreted as prescribing or
recommending dieting or diets. It is a summary of personal
opinions reached after research into the field.)
Locating and remedying deficiencies and excesses in vitamins,
minerals, enzymes, sugar, protein, oil and fats, carbohydrates
and bulk fiber, as well as other dietary elements, is the
keynote of dieting. No special substance or food or
abstinence from it is a whole answer.
Diet should be considered a subject where one seeks a
balance of body support elements and determines quantity.
The problem of weight is resolved by counting daily
calories of consumption of the diet as a whole. This is the
only contemporary successful method which proves itself.
Fasting, magic foods eaten to the exclusion of others,
dozens of dietary fads alike tend to be more harmful than
beneficial.
At times, personal allergies have to be taken into account.
In some persons, disease or illness has to be allowed for.
But in both cases the artificial creation of deficiencies
in vitamins, minerals and other elements must be guarded
against and made up for in some other way.
When large dosages of certain vitamins, minerals or
foodstuffs are given, an artificial deficiency can
apparently be created in others not given. Increase of some
elements, just by the fact of being increased, demands
increases in others. When intake of some elements is
markedly increased, balance must be maintained by
proportionately increasing others. A vitamin or mineral
does not work alone-it must be accompanied by other
elements with which it combines to do its work. It will
even rob bones, muscles and tissue to obtain the missing
elements. Artificial deficiencies can be so created.
Any vital substance on which body support depends, when too
reduced or
omitted from consumption, can be depended upon to result in
a nonoptimum physical condition.
When very obvious, it becomes a "disease." And when less
obvious and even undetected, it becomes a "not feeling good."
There is a distinct possibility (after mental and spiritual
factors) that the largest distinctive contributive factor
in aging is the composite of cumulative deficiencies.
Predisposition to other types of illness is in many
instances occasioned by these deficiencies even when the
precipitation is viral or bacterial.
Prolongation of illness is guaranteed when deficiencies
remain present and unremedied.
A lot of people probably go on drugs because they feel so
terrible due to dietary deficiencies. And drugs,
themselves, cause wholesale vitamin and mineral
deficiencies, which then progressively worsen. Recovery
from drugs requires a full repair of these deficiencies.
The bugbear is that man does not know what man's optimum
diet really is. And another difficulty arises in that not
all essential elements to life support have been isolated.
Improvement in these two areas of research is what will
produce greater
longevity and better health for man, barring mental
factors, which of course we have now isolated and resolved.
As we are dealing with a being in an organism, our work is
impeded by man's slow progress in biochemical and
physiological spheres and the attendant authoritarianisms
and fadisms which always arise around uncodified or
littleknown subjects.
The most useful published, popular compilations on the
subject of diets and biochemistry to date were done by the
late Adelle Davis in her four books: Let's Get Well; Let's
Eat Right to Keep Fit; Let's Cook It Right and Let's Have
Healthy Children.
An improperly fed and cared for body is a kind of trap. And
as long as one is pushing a body around, he should make a
sincere attempt, without becoming its slave, to provide it
with the fuel, care and exercise required to keep it
functioning.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
007. HCOB 13 MAR 80RA r. 26 Jul 86 CONDITIONAL STEP AFTER THE PURIF
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 MARCH 1980RA
REVISED 26 JULY 1986
Remimeo
C/Ses
Qual/Tech
Auditors
Cramming Officers
Supervisors
C/S Series 109RA
Purification Rundown Series 11
CONDITIONAL STEP AFTER
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
Refs:
HCOB 6 Feb. 78RC Purif RD Series 1 Rev. 31.7.85 THE PURIFICATION
RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
HCOB 16 Oct. 78 REPAIR CORRECTION LIST
HCOB 24 Nov. 73RF I C/S Series 53RM LF Rev. 26.7.86 HI-LO
TA ASSESSMENT C/S
HCOB 24 Nov. 73RE II C/S Series 53RM SF Rev. 26.7.86
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
HCOB 2 June 78RB CRAMMING REPAIR ASSESSMENT LIST Rev. 31.3.82
Deposits of drugs and biochemical substances in the body
can prevent or inhibit case gain. They can also impede
learning. The Purification Rundown is now a very early step
on the Grade Chart so that a person can get the most
possible gains from his later auditing.
Where a person has had case actions, repair, cramming or
hatting before doing the Purification Rundown, he may not
have benefited from these actions to the extent he could
have, due to the effects of unhandled drugs. A person who
has had extensive repair, little gain on auditing actions
or trouble in cramming or hatting before doing the
Purification Rundown may need a sort-out on those previous
actions once the Purification Rundown is complete so that
any errors can be handled. (The majority of such preclears
would be drug cases who received auditing or cramming
actions before the release of the Purification Rundown in
early 1980.)
In such a case it may be necessary to:
1. CORRECT ANY FAILED AUDITING REPAIR HE WAS GIVEN BEFORE
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN.
2. REPAIR AND COMPLETE ANY FAILED AUDITING PROCESS HE WAS
GIVEN BEFORE THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN.
3. REPAIR ANY FAILED CRAMMING, CORRECTION OR ESTO ACTIONS
HE WAS GIVEN BEFORE OR DURING THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN.
These steps are not necessarily done in the sequence laid
out above, and they are not actions that would be done on
every pc. Not every pc will need them. However, they are
steps that should be considered by the C/S in programing a
pc who has had auditing or cramming prior to doing the
Purification Rundown.
Any needed repair should be programed standardly per the
C/S Series HCOBs, in particular the following:
HCOB 10 June 71 I C/S Series 44R PROGRAMING FROM PREPARED LISTS
HCOB 24 Nov. 73RE II C/S Series 53RM SF Rev. 26.7.86 SHORT
HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
HCOB 15 Sept. 71 C/S Series 60 THE WORST TANGLE
HCOB 20 Apr. 72 II C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY
AND W/C ERROR CORRECTION
HCOB 28 Sept. 82 C/S Series 115 MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================
008. HCOB 5 APR 80 Q&A, THE REAL DEFINITION
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1980
TRs Courses
Q&A, THE REAL DEFINITION
There are several definitions for the term "Q&A."
In Scientologese it is often used to mean "undecisive; not
making up one's mind."
Q stands for "Question." A stands for "Answer." In "perfect
duplication" the answer to a question would be the question.
The real definition as it applies to TRs is "The Question
proceeding from the last Answer."
Example:
Question: How are you?
Answer: I'm fine.
Question: How fine?
Answer: My stomach hurts.
Question: When did your stomach begin hurting?
Answer: About four.
Question: Where were you at four? -etc.,
etc.
The above example is a grievous auditing fault. As each
question is based on the last answer, it is called "Q and
A." It could also be called "Q based on last A." It never
completes any cycle. It tangles pcs up. It violates TR 3.
Don't do it.
I trust the above handles any confusion on this subject.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
009. HCOB 10 APR 80 AUDITOR BEINGNESS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 APRIL 1980
Remimeo
Cl IV Auditors and Above
Acad Supers and Above
AUDITOR BEINGNESS
Refs:
HCOB 16 Aug. 71R II TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED Rev. 5.7.78
HCOB 24 Dec. 79R TRs BASICS RESURRECTED Rev. 19.6.86
HCOB 26 Apr. 71 I TRs AND COGNITIONS
HCOB 10 June 79 Art Series 8 A PROFESSIONAL
The data in this bulletin is for use by a student auditor
or an auditor only after he has been thoroughly trained and
drilled in TRs, including Upper Indoc TRs, and after he has
been trained in metering.
When one is free of uncertainties on the technical basics
of his profession and has mastered the mechanics of those
technical basics, he can move up into another strata and
assume the full beingness of a professional in his field.
So an auditor applies the auditor beingness step after he
has acquired a good mastery of his basics, TRs and
metering. To do otherwise would be out-gradient,
out-sequence and would rarely, if ever, be successful.
_____________
BEINGNESS, correctly defined, is: THE RESULT OF HAVING ASSUMED
AN IDENTITY.
ATTITUDE IS: THE OPINION ONE HOLDS OR THE BEHAVIOR ONE
EXPRESSES TOWARD SOME PERSON, SPACE, THING OR SYMBOL AS A
RESULT OF THE CONCEPT HE HAS OF IT.
TRs reflect an auditor's attitude.
And what is back of attitude? It is certainty and beingness.
Your beingness and attitude toward the pc are the things which
your TRs measure. If you as an auditor simply go into a robotic
imitation of a tone level or attitude or identity, you aren't
there at all. It will be apparent in your TRs.
It is the beingness which comes first and that gets
reflected in your attitude and your attitude, in turn, is
then reflected in your TRs.
And what directly influences beingness? Certainty. Before
one can assume the beingness of an auditor he must have
certainty on the materials of auditing. That means
certainty on TRs and certainty on the meter and his own
metering.
The importance of all these factors is based on the fact
that they, each one, immediately and directly affect the
pc's "in-sessionness."
TRs AND METERING: THE TWO FOREMOST ACTIONS
There is a very good reason why you do TRs and metering as
your two foremost actions. It has to do with the pc being
"in-session."
Any auditor worthy of the title has the goal of his pc
achieving case gain.
Toward that end, the first aim of the auditor is to put the
pc in-session. Until and unless that happens, nothing else
is going to happen in the way of case gain for the pc.
With your TRs in, the pc is confident that he is being
listened to and that he is getting the attention that is
desirable for the resolution of his case. Therefore he's
willing to talk to you.
If your metering is very exact and you're not leaving the
pc up in the air or plowed in with misreads or false reads,
he has confidence in what you're saying because what you
say reads is what he feels. There's a coordination there.
So between these two things we get the definition of
"in-session" for a pc which is: INTERESTED IN OWN CASE AND
WILLING TO TALK TO THE AUDITOR.
If your TRs are rough and your metering is bad, you won't
get that reaction in a pc and you won't get enough case
gain to bother with.
THE BASIC THING THAT MONITORS CASE GAIN IS: PC INTERESTED
IN OWN CASE AND WILLING TO TALK TO THE AUDITOR.
Without that, you won't get any case gain on a pc. With it,
given that he is audited on the correct processes, the pc's
case progress is assured.
TRs AND IN-SESSIONNESS
There is some interesting data which points up this matter
of TRs and in-sessionness.
Back in the days before we had TRs I had a funny phenomenon
occurring. I would audit somebody in London, then go away
and time would march on. I'd come back, pick up the same pc
and find him at the exact point where I'd left him, even
though he had been audited by a lot of other auditors. That
would be 6 or 8 months and lots of auditing hours later. It
would be explained away with, "Well, of course, Ron is a
good auditor," and naturally they were saying that.
Actually, that would be quite a critical thing to say about
the other auditors as, while we didn't have pc programs
then, we did have processes that advanced a pc's case. That
being true, how did it happen that that pc stayed parked
right where I had left him? The answer is elementary. When
I was auditing him, he was interested in his own case and
willing to talk to the auditor. That was all.
The phenomenon was pronounced and it showed up in other
ways. Every now
and then I would arrive at the London Org and people would
come in from the surrounding cities or areas and hang
around in the hall. I was moving around the org a lot and
as I would move out into the hall someone would rush up to
me and tell me an awful tale of woe. This person's husband
had just left her, or that person had just gone through a
bankruptcy or something horrible. They would give me these
stories and I would acknowledge them and then start to say
something about what we might do about it. But they didn't
listen any further to what I was saying after the
acknowledgment; at that point they would go off and seem
perfectly happy.
It didn't just happen once; it was rather a consistent
phenomenon. I never did anything to solve any of those
problems, and they were legion-there were hordes of them.
Very peculiar. I began wondering what exactly this
phenomenon was and the HCO Area Secretary at the time
volunteered: "They just want you to know about it and that
makes them feel better." But the truth of the matter was
that it was simply TR 2.
They were willing to talk to me about their troubles and I
was concerned, I was interested in them, and I did
acknowledge that it was a rough scene, etc. And apparently
that was adequate to convey to them that they had now
talked about their troubles and been heard, and that was
it. Somebody was willing to listen to them and acknowledge
and that, apparently, would blow it. That's TR 2.
I am not holding myself up here as the last word in TRs.
The whole point I am making is the fact that if your TRs
were good enough you could almost bypass processes and get
a surface level of case gain. You wouldn't get anything in
depth but you would get a surface level of case gain.
The phenomenon described above has been going on for a long
time. It's been going on since the earliest days of
Christianity and I'm sure the Christians picked it up from
somebody before that. It's a basic mechanism so somebody
picked up this confessional idea somewhere along the line.
It's very far from the only mechanism there is in the mind,
but it in itself was good enough to carry the Roman
Catholic Church through hundreds of years over the out-TRs
of those father confessors. (There is no way that confront
and TR 0 could be construed as in when the father confessor
goes into his box, pulls the curtain and then listens to a
confessional.) Also, anything that Freudian analysis ever
had to offer depends exclusively upon this same
mechanism-the person feeling that he has been listened to.
But there is not a psychoanalyst in the business who ever
heard of TR 2. You want to know how someone being analyzed
can sit there and talk for hours and hours on the same
subject? Obviously the psychoanalyst's TR 2 is out because
he's making the pc overrun. And all the psychiatrists know
how to do is give the person another pound of tranquilizers
or electric shock. That is lousy TR 2. It is not even a
substitute.
Some years ago I didn't even know TRs existed, that they
were anything special or could be broken down into
anything. But in Phoenix, Arizona, when I was giving live
demonstrations on closed circuit TV for students, one staff
member came out very, very excited about a discovery he had
made. His discovery was:
"You acknowledge what the pc says!" There apparently wasn't
another auditor the length and breadth of the world who was
doing that, so I decided I had better study this. It led
into, over the years, a very deep analysis of the cycle of
communication. Apparently nobody had ever analyzed this
before but there is a very full analysis of cycles of
communication now and the bulk of it is contained in the
early Saint Hill lectures.
You are now studying the near ultimate of this strata of
auditing.
The whole point here is: If your TRs were good enough you
would be known as a great auditor without doing a single
thing. I'm not advising that you shouldn't do another
single thing but I want to point up that just this factor
alone-good TRs- makes people feel better. It becomes safe
to talk to the auditor and they become willing to talk to
the auditor with confidence they will be listened to and
acknowledged.
It comes down to the definition of "in-session": interested
in own case and willing to talk to the auditor. That
definition of in-session is such that I can C/S and spot,
even from fragmentary worksheets, whether or not the pc is
in-session. When I am first C/Sing on a new line, that is
really all I look for. If it's out, I mend it. When I've
got it mended, then we can begin to get someplace.
If you've got thousands of years of background history
where they were getting along without knowing a blasted
thing about TRs and it still had a workability, you can see
where you could get if you really knew your TRs.
The potential is there and it is up to every auditor to
realize it.
METERING AND IN-SESSIONNESS
The pc's in-sessionness is going to be influenced by your
understanding of the meter and your metering. When you have
confidence in the meter and your metering ability, you
build greater confidence on the part of the pc.
First, it's got to be real to you as an auditor that the
meter has something to do with the being you have it
attached to, that it does connect up with that person's
bank and that the meter works. It is important for the pc
to realize that too.
There is a drill which makes this real to both auditor and
pc. It's called the pinch test.
Whenever I have a new meter to test, I put someone on the
cans, give him an R-factor on what I'm going to do, and
then I just reach over and pinch the person. Then I ask him
to recall the pinch and when he does I see a meter read
occur. I know then whether that meter works or not.
The theory behind this is quite simple. Life has the
ability to register an impingement and to retain it or
reduplicate it. Life has that ability and that is all the
meter measures. So, when you do a pinch test you'll see the
meter read. You can actually see the meter read before you
pinch if you reach up and then don't pinch. It is simply a
matter of reactions.
The meter is measuring reactions to impingements in life.
That is all there is to it. In a pinch test it is measuring
the reaction to the impingement of the pinch.
There is another datum that can be stated here to make it
even clearer to an auditor how the meter connects up with
the pc's bank. The E-Meter is an interlocking device with
the electrons of the bank. With the bank you have a sheet
of energy there and it is made out of electricity. When you
pass a current of electricity near the thing, it is going
to monitor that current of electricity and that is what
shows up on the meter.
The auditor who understands that datum will have certainty
on the fact that when the meter reads it is reading on
something.
If the meter reads when you ask about "ARC break," it is
reading either on the fact that the pc has an ARC break or
that he is startled to be asked if he has an ARC break when
he really has a problem, but it is reading on something.
You don't just walk on by it.
This is what I had to teach Class VIIIs: that you check
Suppress and False when all is not running well. Because
for a meter to read something must exist for it to read on.
And normally it is exactly what you said. You said "Do fish
fly?" and it read.
There is something there. An accurate meter does not idly read.
Your knowledge of the meter and your skill with a good
operating meter has to be such that you have certainty on
this and can't be given a sales talk and sold on the idea
that "There's nothing there, really; it just happened to read."
Without that certainty it goes off the rails. Instead of
asking "What was that withhold?" and really cleaning it up,
you'll say, "Well, maybe . . . All right, maybe it was in
some past life or something so let's go on to the next
question...." NO! There goes your pc out of session. That's
it. He can't be interested in his own case now. His own
case has just been alter-ised.
Without certainty on the fact that when the meter reads it
reads on something, you're going to waffle on what you ask
the pc. That will deteriorate your beingness and your
attitude and put the pc out of session.
An auditor must also be a technician on meter interpretation.
He observes the meter reaction; that's an observation.
After observation there is a point of interpretation.
Those are two different steps. You have to get observation
down pat before you get into interpretation. So sandwiched
in between your auditing question and interpretation is
observation.
What the auditor must not miss is his observation of the
needle on the dial, that it moves and that it reacts and
that it does so because it is connected to the pc. So there
is a point of action in there which is observation.
An auditor determines to find out something. That is an
interrogation. It is followed by an observation, and that
is followed by an interpretation.
You've got to single out the observation as to what it is,
and then the
interpretation as to what it is, and the causation that
makes the meter read as to what it is. You will then have
these things unstuck and separated out from each other.
There is nothing complicated about any of this unless someone
makes it complicated. You can have a million interpretations
and one truth. What makes the road hard to travel is that
the interpretations (or alter-ises) are, every one of them,
liable to be given the same importance as the truth. There
can be an infinity of "facts" and only one truth, so that
one truth gets lost like a drop of water in the ocean.
Which is the drop of water? I'll tell you what the drop of
water is: It is the point of observation. And part of that
observation is the fact that the meter is connected to the
pc and the pc does have a bank. It then becomes clear that
the meter reads because there is something there for it to
read on.
So there is an area of confidence in the meter for the
auditor which contributes to his auditor beingness. This
results in greater confidence on the part of the pc which,
in turn, contributes to the pc's ability to be in-session.
BEINGNESS AND ATTITUDE
Once you have acquired certainty on your TRs and metering,
the next step is beingness.
This can give rise to an infinity of questions: "What is
this 'beingness'?" "How do I assume a beingness?" "Is it an
artificial beingness I'm wearing?" "Do I need to adopt a
different beingness?"
It is NOT a matter of a listing question, such as "What am
I being?" It is something you simply have to work out for
yourself; there isn't anybody who can do it for you.
In sorting this out, one can get into such matters as
interesting and interested. It should help to realize there
is nothing worse than an interesting auditor. It's a wrong
beingness.
If you're disturbed by having to sit on a hard chair as an
auditor, it will color your beingness. It will color your
attitude. If your confront of evil is very low, it will
show up especially on your TR 0 and will cause you to do
all sorts of oddball things with your TRs.
What does confront of evil have to do with beingness? Well,
what being can confront evil? It is not necessarily an evil
being. Let us say a pc comes in and says, "I have just
strangled a dog and took a great deal of pleasure in it,"
and you say "WHAT???!!!" You are never going to get him in
the kind of shape where he doesn't go around strangling
dogs. Why? Because he has just learned that he shouldn't
talk to the auditor.
Whatever you're doing as an auditor, if you're doing it
through a colored beingness you've got a misattitude and
your pc becomes unwilling. You start developing session
withholds in the pc. These will be innocent withholds, such
as "I don't have any interest in that but I won't tell him
so," or "I didn't really think that read...."
They will most likely be innocent withholds, but you now
have a pc who isn't in there pitching. And that's the point
at which the session deteriorates.
If you're not sure of your beingness, if you haven't
decided upon your
beingness, if your beingness is wobbly, then your attitude
toward the pc will be uncertain and wobbly. And your
attitude toward the pc will then color your TRs. In that
case you can ask "Do fish fly?" until hell freezes over and
drill and drill and drill continuously and religiously. And
you are not going to get anywhere until you get your
beingness and your attitude settled.
What IS auditor beingness? Well, what are you being as you
sit in the auditing chair auditing the pc? Are you a
beingness somebody would be willing to talk to? The general
attitude connected with your TRs is what signals this.
Your beingness as an auditor is something you yourself must
DECIDE upon.
It's a step to be taken when you are certain of your
auditing basics. It could be done in minutes or it could
require hours or days. But if you take a look at all of
this data and apply it, you actually could simply decide
"What is my beingness as an auditor?" and "Exactly what is
my attitude toward pcs?" and your beingness as an auditor
might suddenly go click. Your attitude then will fall
comfortably into place, and that will be reflected in your TRs.
These are the skills you need to acquire. But it is basic
simplicities you are after, as I have described them here.
I've given you an analysis of the scene that hasn't been
stated quite this way before. It begins with certainty on
technical basics, TRs and metering. It's then a matter of
assuming an auditor beingness which comes across in your
attitude. At that point your TRs, already well drilled, can
be brought up easily to a point of flawlessness.
And from there it's a short step to your pcs, each and
every one, interested in own case and willing to talk to
the auditor.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
010. HCOB 21 APR 80R r. 18 Oct 86 PC EXAMINER
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1980R
REVISED 18 OCTOBER 1986
(Also issued as HCO PL 13 Oct. 68RA,
Rev. 18.10.86, same title)
Remimeo
Exam Hat
Tech/Qual
All Auditors
PC EXAMINER
Cancels and Replaces:
HCOB 21 Apr. 80 EXAMINER
HCO PL 13 Oct. 68 EXAMINER
HCO PL 13 Oct. 68R EXAMINER Rev. 21.4.80
HCO PL 11 Dec. 68 ADDENDUM TO HCO PL 13 OCT. 1968, EXAMINER
HCO PL 26 Jan. 70II EXAMINER AND FLOATING NEEDLE
BPL 26 Jan. 70 II EXAMINER AND FLOATING NEEDLE
BPL 26 Jan. 70R III EXAMINER AND FLOATING NEEDLE Rev. 20.7.75
Refs:
HCO PL 5 Aug. 65 RELEASE CHECKOUTS
HCO PL 11 Apr. 70II REVIEW COMPLETE?
HCOB 11 Nov. 73 PRECLEAR DECLARE? PROCEDURE
HCO PL 8 Sept. 70 RA EXAMINER'S 24-HOUR RULE Rev. 24.10.75
HCO PL 13 Jan. 71 EXAM 24-HOUR RULE, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
HCO PL 8 Mar. 71 EXAMINER'S FORM
A metered examination is given to the preclear after each
session or if the pc wants to make any statement concerning
his case. Exams are also done after actions such as Word
Clearing, Post Purpose Clearing, Crashing Mis-U Finding and
False Data Stripping.
The whole duty of the Examiner is to note the TA and needle
behavior of the pc.
This duty is done muzzled. No talk or chatter.
The pc comes in. The Examiner smiles, indicates for the pc
to sit down.
The Examiner hands the pc the cans.
The Examiner notes the TA and the needle and looks up at
the pc for his
statement.
When the pc says what he wants to say, the Examiner says,
"Thank you very much," and he indicates an F/N or floating
TA if he sees one.
The Examiner then indicates with an arm gesture the way out.
This is the whole drill.
To do or say anything else can invalidate the pc and/or
lose the F/N he or she got in session. You don't as an
Examiner care about anything except TA, needle behavior,
statement and pc indicators. The pc will tell you what he
wants to. You don't have to ask for it.
If the pc makes some remark or asks a question directed at
the Examiner, the Examiner can and should politely
acknowledge the pc. (Example: Pc says, "How are you today?"
and Examiner replies, "Fine, thank you.") But the Examiner
does not originate any comm during an after-session exam.
The whole idea is that the Examiner must never invalidate
or evaluate for the pc by word, attitude or expression.
ADMINISTRATION
Part of the Examiner's duty is to keep in accurate and
useful admin on all examinations. An Examiner's log must be
kept for each exam. It is not necessary to copy the Exam
Report. It is necessary to note who, what for, when, meter
phenomena and where sent.
The Examiner is to inform the Qual Sec and Senior C/S of
all non-F/N exams and sickness reports.
Also, the Examiner must originate an out-tech report, with
a copy to the Qual Sec, on each after-session exam where
there is no F/N, VGIs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
LRH Technical Research
and Compilations
==================