No matching fragments found in this document.
The
Technical Bulletins
of
Dianetics and Scientology
by
L. Ron Hubbard
FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
Volume
XI
1976-1978
_____________________________________________________________________
I will not always be here on guard.
The stars twinkle in the Milky Way
And the wind sighs for songs
Across the empty fields of a planet
A Galaxy away.
You won't always be here.
But before you go,
Whisper this to your sons
And their sons -
"The work was free.
Keep it so."
L. RON HUBBARD
[pic]L. RON HUBBARD
Founder of Dianetics and Scientology
EDITOR'S NOTE
With Technical Volume XI, L. Ron Hubbard is giving Scientologists
everywhere one of their most precious possessions-his remarkable technical
achievements of the last two years. 1977-1978 have been spectacular years
of Dianetics and Scientology discoveries, filled with numerous
breakthroughs made by him.
Volume XI continues from where Volume VIII ended with bulletins issued
through July 1976. Preceding these latest issues from August 1976 through
September 20, 1978 contained herein, there are presented 35 issues (dated
1959 onward) that were not included in the earlier Technical Volumes but
which can be published now. These bulletins are listed at the start of the
Chronological Contents on page xvi.
As in the original Technical Volumes, if an issue has been revised,
replaced, or cancelled, this has been indicated in the upper right-hand
corner along with the page number of the issue which should be referred to.
The Chronological Contents shows at what point on the time track each
issue in this volume was released, and the Long Contents gives you a
breakdown of the subject content of each separate HCOB or issue.
In the Subject Index at the back of this volume, main entries appear in
boldface type to make it easy to find any subject.
If the title of a bulletin is known but not the date of issue, the
Alphabetical List of Titles may be consulted to locate the issue fast.
Lastly, the Cancellations and Revisions lists show you which issues in
previous Technical Volumes have been cancelled or revised by issues
presented in this present Volume XI.
The Editor
TECHNICAL BULLETINS
1976-1978
CONTENTS
1959
20 May Know to Mystery Straight Wire for Extreme Cases 1
1962
3 May R ARC Breaks-Missed Withholds (revised 5 Sept. 1978) 2
28 June R Dirty Needles-How to Smooth Out Needles (revised 5 Sept.
1978) 6
12 Sept. R Security Checks Again (revised 5 Sept. 1978) 8
8 Nov. R Somatics-How to Tell Terminals and Opposition Terminals
(revised 5 Sept. 1978) (reissued 9 Oct. 1978) 10
30 Dec. R Routines 2-12 & 2-10-Case Errors-Points of Greatest
Importance
(revised 5 Sept. 1978) 14
1963
8 June R The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains-Bulletin 2-
Handling the Time Track (revised 3 Oct. 1977)
(reissued 21 Mar. 1978) 25
1964
10 Mar. Basic Auditing-Non-Reading Meters-Meter Flinch 31
1966
12 Oct. Examinations (HCO PL) 32
1968
23 Aug. Arbitraries 33
23 Aug. Workability of Tech 34
26 Aug. The Class VIII Course 35
10 Sept. Case Supervisor-Admin in Auditing 36
10 Sept. Flunks 37
10 Sept. "Standard" Tech Data 38
10 Sept. Valence Shifter (amended 20 Sept. 1968) 39
11 Sept. C/S Instructions 40
15 Sept. Pc Looking or Continually Feeling Tired 41
15 Sept. The First Thing I Learned About Teaching a Class VIII Auditor
41
16 Sept. End Phenomena 42
1968 (cont.)
22 Sept. Rehabs 43
23 Sept. Violation of the Laws of Listing and Nulling 44
26 Sept. The Study of the "Well Done" LRH C/S Folder 44
29 Sept. List Correction (amended 29 Oct. 1968) 45
4 Oct. Advance Courses 46
4 Oct. Pre-OTs 46
5 Oct. ARC Break Needle 47
21 Oct. R Floating Needle (revised 9 July 1977)
(corrected and reissued 15 July 1977) 48
1 Nov. Overt-Motivator Definitions 49
5 Dec. Unresolving Cases 50
15 Dec.RA L4BRA-For Assessment of All Listing Errors
(re-revised 11 Apr. 1977) 51
1969
2 Apr. RA Dianetic Assists (revised 28 July 1978) 55
17 Apr. R Dianetic Case Supervision (revised 25 July 1978) 58
23 Apr. RA Dianetics-Basic Definitions (re-revised 20 Sept. 1978)
59
24 Apr. RA Dianetic Use (re-revised 20 Sept. 1978) 64
24 Apr. R Dianetic Results (revised 20 July 1978) 68
26 Apr. R Somatics (revised 11 July 1978) 69
28 Apr. R High TA in Dianetics (revised 20 Sept. 1978) 71
7 May R Floating Needle (revised 15 July 1977) 72
8 May Important Study Data (reissued 23 Jan. 1977) 73
8 May R Teaching the Dianetics Course (revised 31 Mar. 1977) 74
9 May RA Case Supervising New Era Dianetics Folders
(re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 75
11 May R Meter Trim Check (revised 8 July 1978) 77
18 May R Erasure (revised 3 Aug. 1978) 78
23 May R Auditing Out Sessions-Narrative Versus Somatic Chains
(revised 11 July 1978) 79
28 May RA How Not to Erase (re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 80
28 June RA C/S-How to Case Supervise Dianetics Folders
(re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 82
17 July RB New Era Dianetics Command Training Drills
(re-revised 4 Sept. 1978) 86
19 July RA Dianetics and Illness (re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 91
21 July One-Hand Electrodes 93
22 July R Auditing Speed (revised 20 Sept. 1978) 94
24 July R Seriously Ill Pcs (revised 24 July 1978) 95
2 Aug. R "LX" Lists (revised 4 Sept. 1978) 96
3 Aug. R LX2-Emotional Assessment List (revised 22 Aug. 1978)
98
1969 (cont.)
9 Aug. R LX1 (Conditions) (revised 21 Aug. 1978) (reissued 4 Nov.
1978) 99
9 Aug.RA Case Folder Analysis, New Era Dianetics (re-revised 21
Sept. 1978) 100
17 Oct.RA Drugs, Aspirin and Tranquilizers (re-revised 20 Sept.
1978) 104
5 Nov. R LX3 (Attitudes) (revised 4 Sept. 1978) 107
15 Nov. R Case Supervision-Auditing and Results (revised 27 July
1978) 108
23 Nov.RB Student Rescue Intensive (re-revised 4 Sept. 1978) 110
21 Dec. Solo Auditing and R6EW 112
1970
27 Feb. Group Engram Process 114
11 Mar. Important Note on Group Engram Intensive 115
15 Mar. Double Folder Danger 115
25 June RA Glossary of C/S Terms (C/S Series 12RA) (revised 6 Oct.
1978) 116
30 June RA VIII Actions (C/S Series 13RA) (re-revised 9 Apr. 1977)
118
15 July R Unresolved Pains (revised 17 July 1978) 122
16 Aug. R Getting the F/N to Examiner (C/S Series 15R) (revised 7
July 1978) 124
11 Sept. Solo Assists 127
11 Sept. R Chronic Somatic, Dianetic Handling of (C/S Series 18R)
(revised 7 July 1978) 127
1971
8 Mar. R Case Actions, Off Line (C/S Series 29R) (revised 25 July
1978) 128
27 Mar.RA Dianetic Erasure (re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 130
5 Apr. Triple and Quad Reruns (C/S Series 33RA-1) (reissued 6 Nov.
1976) 132
11 Apr.RC L3RF-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List (re-revised 21 Sept.
1978) 135
21 Apr.RC Dianetics (C/S Series 36RC) (revised 25 July 1978) 141
26 Apr. Solo Cognitions 145
9 June RA C/S Tips (C/S Series 41RA) (re-revised 28 Mar. 1977)
146
29 June RA Steps to Speed Student Product Flow (W/C Series 7RA)
(reissued 27 Sept. 1977) 149
5 July RB Assists (C/S Series 49RB) (re-revised 20 Sept. 1978)
150
17 July R Out of Valence (C/S Series 51R) (revised 6 July 1978)
152
23 July R Assists (revised 16 July 1978) 153
28 July RA Dianetics, Beginning a Pc on (C/S Series 54RA, NED Series
8R)
(re-revised 22 Sept. 1978) 155
16 Aug. R Training Drills Remodernized (revised 5 July 1978) 157
8 Sept. R Case Supervisor Actions (revised 20 May 1975) 163
14 Sept. R Dianetic List Errors (C/S Series 59R) (revised 19 July
1978) 192
25 Sept.RB Tone Scale In Full (revised 1 Apr. 1978) 193
24 Oct. R False TA (revised 26 Jan. 1977) 194
12 Nov.RA False TA Addition (revised 26 Jan. 1977) 198
1972
15 Feb. R False TA Addition 2 (revised 26 Jan. 1977) 199
18 Feb. R False TA Addition 3 (revised 26 Jan. 1977) 200
19 Mar. C/Sing or Auditing Without Folder Study (HCO PL) 202
4 Apr. R Ethics and Study Tech (HCO PL) (revised 21 June 1975)
203
24 Apr. Auditor Recovery (LRH ED 176 INT) (reissued 11 Apr. 1977)
205
3 May R Ethics and Executives (HCO PL) (Exec. Series 12)
(revised 18 Dec. 1977) 207
16 June RA Auditor's Rights Modified (C/S Series 8 RA)
(re-revised 7 Dec. 1976) 213
1973
11 July RB Assist Summary (re-revised 21 Sept. 1978) 215
16 Nov. Study Tech & Post (HCO PL) 221
23 Nov.RA Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA (revised 26 Jan. 1977)
222
1974
28 Mar. R Expanded Dianetics Developments Since the Original Lectures-
Cancellation (Exp. Dn. Series 21R) (cancelled 9 May 1977)
(corrected 11 May 1977) 224
23 Apr.RA Expanded Dianetics Requisites (Exp. Dn. Series 22RA)
(revised 1 Oct. 1976) 225
31 Aug.RA New Grade Chart (C/S Series 93RA) (re-revised 9 Apr. 1977)
226
1 Nov.RA Rock Slams and Rock Slammers (revised 5 Sept. 1978) 229
1975
16 Jan. R Past Life Remedies (revised 6 July 1978) 232
23 Apr. R Vanishing Cream and False TA (revised 26 Jan. 1977) 235
29 Oct. Special Rundown Lectures (29 Oct.-8 Dec. 1975) 236
1976
Aug. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology 237
10 Aug. R R/Ses, What They Mean (revised 5 Sept. 1978) 238
Oct. The Volunteer Minister's Handbook 243
20 Oct. PTS Data 244
20 Oct. R PTS Data (HCO PL) (revised 29 June 1977) 245
20 Oct. PTS Handling 246
23 Oct. Interneship and HGC (HCO PL)
(cancelled-see HCO PL 9 Dec. 1978 Vol. XII) 247
24 Oct. R Delivery Repair Lists (C/S Series 96R) (revised 10 Feb.
1977) 248
26 Oct. Auditing Reports, Falsifying of (C/S Series 97) 254
1976 (cont.)
28 Oct. Auditing Folders, Omissions in Completeness (C/S Series 98)
256
Dec. Modern Management Technology Defined 258
6 Dec. Illegal Pcs, Acceptance of-High Crime Bulletin 259
10 Dec.RA Scientology F/N and TA Position (C/S Series 99RA)
(re-revised 18 Sept. 1978) 260
1977
10 Jan. How to Win with Word Clearing (W/C Series 55) 263
10 Jan. Ethics and Word Clearing (HCO PL) 264
13 Jan. RA Handling a False TA (revised 5 Mar. 1977) 265
21 Jan. RA False TA Checklist (revised and reissued 7 June 1978)
267
22 Jan. In-Tech, The Only Way to Achieve It 273
24 Jan. Tech Correction Round-Up 274
26 Jan. Footplates Use Forbidden (corrected and reissued 20 Mar. 1977)
288
27 Jan. Auditor Recovery (cancelled 5 Dec. 1977) 289
30 Jan. False TA Data (corrected 19 Mar. 1977) 290
5 Feb. Jokers and Degraders (C/S Series 100) 291
17 Feb. R Course Necessities (revised 20 Feb. 1977) 293
24 Feb. Expanded Dianetics Cases (corrected and reissued 26 Feb. 1977)
294
1 Mar. Cancellation of Integrity Processing HCOBs 295
1 Mar. Confessional Forms 296
1 Mar. Formulating Confessional Questions 297
1 Mar. A Valid Confessional (reissue of circa 1965) 300
8 Mar. R Power Checklist (revised 7 Apr. 1977) 302
16 Mar. The Gambler (Exp. Dn. Series 25) 304
27 Mar. Programming of Expanded Dianetics 305
5 Apr. Expanded Grades 307
11 Apr. List Errors-Correction of 308
17 Apr. Recurring Withholds and Overts 310
7 May Long Duration Sec Checking 311
9 May Foreword of Expanded Dianetics Course 312
9 May Psychosis, More About (Exp. Dn. Series 29) 313
31 May LSD-Years After They Have "Come Off of" LSD 315
14 June Paid Completions Simplified 316
26 Sept. Art and Communication 319
Oct. Have You Lived Before This Life? 321
4 Dec. Checklist for Setting Up Sessions and an E-Meter 322
1978
6 Feb. R LSD and the Sweat Program (revised 16 Mar. 1978) 324
1978 (cont.)
6 Feb.R-1 LSD and the Sweat Program-Addition (addition of 16 Mar.
1978) 327
26 Feb. Interneships vs. Courses 328
10 Mar. HGC Pc Application Form (HCO PL) 330
18 Mar. Postulates and Engrams (cancelled-see 403) 332
19 Mar. Quickie Objectives 333
23 Mar. R Word Clearing Definitions (W/C Series 59R) (revised 12
Nov. 1978) 334
27 Mar. Ethics Penalty for Word Clearers (W/C Series 58) 335
3 Apr. TR Debug Assessment 336
8 Apr. An F/N Is a Read (cancelled-see 487) 338
30 Apr. The Sweat Program Further Data 339
1 May Tech Quality (Cramming Series 17) 342
26 May Dianetics: Urgent Command Change 343
2 June R Cramming Repair Assessment List (Cramming Series 18R)
(revised 14 June 1978) 345
15 June Urgent Important 349
18 June Routine 3-R Command Change 349
18 June R Assessment and How to Get the Item (NED Series 4R)
(revised 20 Sept. 1978) 350
19 June Objective ARC (NED Series 3) 356
20 June Identity Rundown (NED Series 15) 357
21 June New Era Dianetics Series 1 358
22 June R New Era Dianetics Full Pc Program Outline (NED Series 2R)
(revised 16 Sept. 1978) 360
23 June R Preclear Checklist (NED Series 16R) (revised 22 Sept.
1978) 365
24 June R Original Assessment Sheet (NED Series 5R) (revised 22
Sept. 1978) 367
26 June RA Routine 3RA-Engram Running by Chains (NED Series 6RA)
(re-revised 15 Sept. 1978) 380
28 June RA R3RA Commands (NED Series 7RA) (re-revised 15 Sept. 1978)
390
29 June Disability Rundown (NED Series 14) 395
1 July The Dianetic Prepared Assessment Rundown-Action Fourteen
(NED Series 13) 396
2 July Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive (NED Series 11) 399
3 July R Relief Rundown (NED Series 10R) (revised 22 Sept. 1978)
400
4 July R Second Original Assessment (NED Series 12R)
(revised 22 Sept. 1978) 401
7 July Dianetic F/Ns (cancelled-see 480) 403
9 July R Dianetic CS-1 (revised 4 Sept. 1978) 404
11 July The Preassessment List (NED Series 4-1) (reissued 11 Oct. 1978)
414
14 July R Typical Dianetic Chain (revised 15 Sept. 1978) 416
14 July R A Typical Narrative Item (revised 15 Sept. 1978) 417
15 July Scientology Auditing CS-1 418
19 July Dianetic Persistent F/Ns (NED Series 17) 427
1978 (cont.)
20 July After the Fact Items (NED Series 18) 428
21 July What Is a Floating Needle? 429
22 July Assessment TRs 430
23 July List of Perceptics (C/S Series 101) 431
24 July Dianetic Remedies 433
2 Aug. Cancellation of Issues 436
5 Aug. Instant Reads 438
7 Aug. Havingness-Finding and Running the Pc's Havingness Process
439
9 Aug. New Era Dianetics-A Requisite for Expanded Dianetics 441
9 Aug. Clearing Commands 442
11 Aug. Rudiments-Definitions and Patter 445
11 Aug. Model Session 450
21 Aug. Running Flows That Won't Erase 452
26 Aug. R More on Drugs (revised 5 Oct. 1978) 453
3 Sept. Definition of a Rock Slam 454
5 Sept. Anatomy of a Service Facsimile 456
6 Sept. Following Up on Dirty Needles 459
6 Sept. Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams 461
6 Sept. Routine Three SC-A-Full Service Facsimile Handling Updated
With New Era Dianetics 463
7 Sept. R Modern Repetitive Prepchecking (revised 21 Oct. 1978)
469
8 Sept. Mini List of Grade 0-IV Processes 471
10 Sept. NED High Crime 473
12 Sept. Dianetics Forbidden on Clears and OTs 473
12 Sept. Overrun by Demanding Earlier Than There Is 474
13 Sept. R3RA Engram Running by Chains and Narrative R3RA-
An Additional Difference 476
13 Sept. Clears, OTs and R/Ses 478
13 Sept. An Old Poem (HCO PL) 478
15 Sept. Confidentiality of Upper Level Rundowns (HCO PL) 479
16 Sept. Postulate Off Equals Erasure 480
19 Sept. A.D. 28-The Year of Technical Breakthroughs (LRH ED 298 INT)
482
19 Sept. The End of Endless Drug RDs (revised-see Vol. XII) 484
19 Sept. The End of Endless Drug Rundowns-Drug Rundown Repair List
(revised-see Vol. XII) 485
20 Sept. An Instant F/N Is a Read (reissued 9 Oct. 1978) 487
20 Sept. LX List Handling 489
20 Sept. NED Auditor Analysis Checklist (NED Series 19, C/S Series 103)
492
Subject Index 500
Alphabetical List of Titles 566
Cancellations and Revisions 568
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
The Chronological Contents is a full contents list showing the
chronology of the issues in this volume. It lists the issues under the date
when each was last revised or reissued. If the issue has never been revised
or reissued then it is simply listed under its original issue date. Persons
who wish to study the HCOBs in chronological sequence will find the
Chronological Contents especially useful.
Note that the first 35 issues listed (from 1959 up to and including 21
June 1975) are from the time period covered by earlier Technical Volumes.
You may wish to note this in the correct places in your Technical Volume
set in order to maintain the chronology.
1959
20 May Know to Mystery Straight Wire for Extreme Cases 1
1964
10 Mar. Basic Auditing-Non-Reading Meters-Meter Flinch 31
1966
12 Oct. Examinations (HCO PL) 32
1968
23 Aug. Arbitraries 33
23 Aug. Workability of Tech 34
26 Aug. The Class VIII Course 35
10 Sept. Case Supervisor-Admin in Auditing 36
10 Sept. Flunks 37
10 Sept. "Standard" Tech Data 38
11 Sept. C/S Instructions 40
15 Sept. Pc Looking or Continually Feeling Tired 41
15 Sept. The First Thing I Learned About Teaching a Class VIII Auditor
41
16 Sept. End Phenomena 42
20 Sept. Valence Shifter (amendment of 10 Sept. 1968) 39
22 Sept. Rehabs 43
23 Sept. Violation of the Laws of Listing and Nulling 44
26 Sept. The Study of the "Well Done" LRH C/S Folder 44
4 Oct. Advance Courses 46
4 Oct. Pre-OTs 46
5 Oct. ARC Break Needle 47
29 Oct. List Correction (amendment of 29 Sept. 1968) 45
1 Nov. Overt-Motivator Definitions 49
5 Dec. Unresolving Cases 50
1969
21 July One-Hand Electrodes 93
21 Dec. Solo Auditing and R6EW 112
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
1970
27 Feb. Group Engram Process 114
11 Mar. Important Note on Group Engram Intensive 115
15 Mar. Double Folder Danger 115
11 Sept. Solo Assists 127
1971
26 Apr. Solo Cognitions 145
1972
19 Mar. C/Sing or Auditing Without Folder Study (HCO PL) 202
1973
16 Nov. Study Tech & Post (HCO PL) 221
1975
20 May Case Supervisor Actions (revision of 8 Sept. 1971) 163
21 June Ethics and Study Tech (HCO PL) (revision of 4 Apr. 1972)
203
29 Oct. Special Rundown Lectures (29 Oct.-8 Dec. 1975) 236
1976
Aug. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology 237
Oct. The VolunteerMinister's Handbook 243
1 Oct. Expanded Dianetics Requisites (Exp. Dn. Series 22RA)
(revision of 23 Apr. 1974) 225
20 Oct. PTS Data 244
20 Oct. PTS Handling 246
23 Oct. Interneship and HGC (HCO PL)
(cancelled-see HCO PL 9 Dec. 1978 Vol. XII) 247
26 Oct. Auditing Reports, Falsifying of (C/S Series 97) 254
28 Oct. Auditing Folders, Omissions in Completeness (C/S Series 98)
256
6 Nov. Triple and Quad Reruns (C/S Series 33RA-1)
(reissue of 5 Apr. 1971) 132
Dec. Modern Management Technology Defined 258
6 Dec. Illegal Pcs, Acceptance of-High Crime Bulletin 259
7 Dec. Auditor's Rights Modified (C/S Series 81RA)
(re-revision of 16 June 1972) 213
1977
10 Jan. How to Win with Word Clearing (W/C Series 55) 263
10 Jan. Ethics and Word Clearing (HCO PL) 264
22 Jan. In-Tech, The Only Way to Achieve It 273
23 Jan. Important Study Data (reissue of 8 May 1969) 73
24 Jan. Tech Correction Round-Up 274
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
26 Jan. False TA (revision of 24 Oct. 1971) 194
26 Jan. False TA Addition (revision of 12 Nov. 1971) 198
26 Jan. False TA Addition 2 (revision of 15 Feb. 1972) 199
26 Jan. False TA Addition 3 (revision of 18 Feb. 1972) 200
26 Jan. Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA (revision of 23 Nov. 1973)
222
26 Jan. Vanishing Cream and False TA (revision of 23 Apr. 1975) 235
5 Feb. Jokers and Degraders (C/S Series 100) 291
10 Feb. Delivery Repair Lists (C/S Series 96R) (revision of 24 Oct.
1976) 248
20 Feb. Course Necessities (revision of 17 Feb. 1977) 293
26 Feb. Expanded Dianetics Cases (correction and reissue of 24 Feb.
1977) 294
1 Mar. Cancellation of Integrity Processing HCOBs 295
1 Mar. Confessional Forms 296
1 Mar. Formulating Confessional Questions 297
1 Mar. A Valid Confessional (reissue of circa 1965) 300
5 Mar. Handling a False TA (revision of 13 Jan. 1977) 265
16 Mar. The Gambler (Exp. Dn. Series 25) 304
19 Mar. False TA Data (correction of 30 Jan. 1977) 290
20 Mar. Footplates Use Forbidden (correction and reissue of 26 Jan.
1977) 288
27 Mar. Programming of Expanded Dianetics 305
28 Mar. C/S Tips (C/S Series 41RA) (re-revision of 9 June 1971) 146
31 Mar. Teaching the Dianetics Course (revision of 8 May 1969) 74
5 Apr. Expanded Grades 307
7 Apr. Power Checklist (revision of 8 Mar. 1977) 302
9 Apr. VIII Actions (C/S Series ERA) (re-revision of 30 June 1970)
118
9 Apr. New Grade Chart (C/S Series 93RA) (re-revision of 31 Aug. 1974)
226
11 Apr. L4BRA-For Assessment of All Listing Errors
(re-revision of 15 Dec. 1968) 51
11 Apr. Auditor Recovery (LRH ED 176 INT) (reissue of 24 Apr. 1972)
205
11 Apr. List Errors-Correction of 308
17 Apr. Recurring Withholds and Overts 310
7 May Long Duration Sec Checking 311
9 May Foreword of Expanded Dianetics Course 312
9 May Psychosis, More About (Exp. Dn. Series 29) 313
11 May Expanded Dianetics Developments Since the Original Lectures-
Cancellation (Exp. Dn. Series 21R) (corrected cancellation of
28 Mar. 1974) 224
31 May LSD-Years After They Have "Come Off of" LSD 315
14 June Paid Completions Simplified 316
29 June PTS Data (HCO PL) (revision of 20 Oct. 1976) 245
15 July Floating Needle (correction and reissue of 21 Oct. 1968 revised
9 July 1977) 48
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
15 July Floating Needle (revision of 7 May 1969) 72
26 Sept. Art and Communication 319
27 Sept. Steps to Speed Student Product Flow (W/C Series 7RA)
(reissue of 29 June 1971 revised 14 July 1977) 149
Oct. Have You Lived Before ThisLife? 321
4 Dec. Checklist for Setting Up Sessions and an E-Meter 322
5 Dec. Auditor Recovery (cancellation of 27 Jan. 1977) 289
18 Dec. Ethics and Executives (HCO PL) (Exec Series 12)
(revision of 3 May 1972) 207
1978
26 Feb. Interneships vs. Courses 328
10 Mar. HGC Pc Application Form (HCO PL) 330
16 Mar. LSD and the Sweat Program (revision of 6 Feb. 1978) 324
16 Mar. LSD and the Sweat Program-Addition (addition to 6 Feb. 1978)
327
18 Mar. Postulates and Engrams (cancelled-see 403) 332
19 Mar. Quickie Objectives 333
21 Mar. The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains-Bulletin 2-
Handling the Time Track (reissue of 8 June 1963 revised 3 Oct.
1977) 25
27 Mar. Ethics Penalty for Word Clearers (W/C Series 58) 335
1 Apr. Tone Scale In Full (revision of 25 Sept. 1971) 193
3 Apr. TR Debug Assessment 336
8 Apr. An F/N Is a Read (cancelled-see 487) 338
30 Apr. The Sweat Program Further Data 339
1 May Tech Quality (Cramming Series 17) 342
26 May Dianetics: Urgent Command Change 343
7 June False TA Checklist (revision and reissue of 21 Jan. 1977)
267
14 June Cramming Repair Assessment List (Cramming Series 18R)
(revision of 2 June 1978) 345
15 June Urgent Important 349
18 June Routine 3-R Command Change 349
19 June Objective ARC (NED Series 3) 356
20 June Identity Rundown (NED Series 15) 357
21 June New Era Dianetics Series 1 358
29 June Disability Rundown (NED Series 14) 395
1 July The Dianetic Prepared Assessment Rundown-Action Fourteen
(NED Series 13) 396
2 July Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive (NED Series 11) 399
5 July Training Drills Remodernized (revision of 16 Aug. 1971) 157
6 July Out of Valence (C/S Series SIR) (revision of 17 July 1971)
152
6 July Past Life Remedies (revision of 16 Jan. 1975) 232
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
7 July Getting the F/N to Examiner (C/S Series 15R) (revision of
16 Aug. 1970) 124
7 July Chronic Somatic, Dianetic Handling of (C/S Series 18R)
(revision of 11 Sept. 1970) 127
7 July Dianetic F/Ns (cancelled-see 480) 403
8 July Meter Trim Check (revision of 11 May 1969) 77
11 July Somatics (revision of 26 Apr. 1969) 69
11 July Auditing Out Sessions-Narrative Versus Somatic Chains
(revision of 23 May 1969) 79
15 July Scientology Auditing CS-1 418
16 July Assists (revision of 23 July 1971) 153
17 July Unresolved Pains (revision of 15 July 1970) 122
19 July Dianetic List Errors (C/S Series 59R) (revision of 14 Sept.
1971) 192
19 July Dianetic Persistent F/Ns (NED Series 17) 427
20 July Dianetic Results (revision of 24 Apr. 1969) 68
20 July After the Fact Items (NED Series 18) 428
21 July What Is a Floating Needle? 429
22 July Assessment TRs 430
23 July List of Perceptics (C/S Series 101) (revision of 10 Mar. 1970)
431
24 July Seriously Ill Pcs (revision of 24 July 1969) 95
24 July Dianetic Remedies 433
25 July Dianetic Case Supervision (revision of 17 Apr. 1969) 58
25 July Case Actions, Off Line (C/S Series 29R) (revision of 8 Mar.
1971) 128
25 July Dianetics (C/S Series 36RC) (revision of 21 Apr. 1971) 141
27 July Case Supervision-Auditing and Results (revision of 15 Nov.
1969) 108
28 July Dianetic Assists (revision of 2 Apr. 1969) 55
2 Aug. Cancellation of Issues 436
3 Aug. Erasure (revision of 18 May 1969) 78
5 Aug. Instant Reads 438
7 Aug. Havingness-Finding and Running the Pc's Havingness Process
439
9 Aug. New Era Dianetics-A Requisite for Expanded Dianetics 441
9 Aug. Clearing Commands 442
11 Aug. Rudiments-Definitions and Patter 445
11 Aug. Model Session 450
21 Aug. Running Flows That Won't Erase 452
22 Aug. LX2-Emotional Assessment List (revision of 3 Aug. 1969) 98
3 Sept. Definition of a Rock Slam 454
4 Sept. New Era Dianetics Command Training Drills (re-revision of
17 July 1969) 86
4 Sept. "LX" Lists (revision of 2 Aug. 1969) 96
4 Sept. LX3 (Attitudes) (revision of 5 Nov. 1969) 107
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
4 Sept. Student Rescue Intensive (re-revision of 23 Nov. 1969)
110
4 Sept. Dianetic CS-1 (revision of 9 July 1978) 404
5 Sept. ARC Breaks-Missed Withholds (revision of 3 May 1962) 2
5 Sept. Dirty Needles-How to Smooth Out Needles (revision of
28 June 1962) 6
5 Sept. Security Checks Again (revision of 12 Sept. 1962) 8
5 Sept. Routines 2-12 & 2-10-Case Errors-Points of Greatest
Importance
(revision of 30 Dec. 1962) 14
5 Sept. Rock Slams and Rock Slammers (revision of 1 Nov. 1974)
229
5 Sept. R/Ses, What They Mean (revision of 10 Aug. 1976) 238
5 Sept. Anatomy of a Service Facsimile 456
6 Sept. Following Up on Dirty Needles 459
6 Sept. Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams 461
6 Sept. Routine Three SC-A-Full Senice Facsimile Handling Updated
With New Era Dianetics 463
8 Sept. Mini List of Grade 0-IV Processes 471
10 Sept. NED High Crime 473
12 Sept. Dianetics Forbidden on Clears and OTs 473
12 Sept. Overrun by Demanding Earlier Than There Is 474
13 Sept. R3RA Engram Running by Chains and Narrative R3RA-
An Additional Difference 476
13 Sept. Clears, OTs and R/Ses 478
13 Sept. An Old Poem (HCO PL) 478
15 Sept. Routine 3RA-Engram Running by Chains (NED Series 6RA)
(re-revision of 26 June 1978) 380
15 Sept. R3RA Commands (NED Series 7RA) (re-revision of 28 June 1978)
390
15 Sept. Typical Dianetic Chain (revision of 14 July 1978) 416
15 Sept. A Typical Narrative Item (revision of 14 July 1978) 417
15 Sept. Confidentiality of Upper Level Rundowns (HCO PL) 479
16 Sept. New Era Dianetics Full Pc Program Outline (NED Series 2R)
(revision of 22 June 1978) 360
16 Sept. Postulate Off Equals Erasure 480
18 Sept. Scientology F/N and TA Position (C/S Series 99RA)
(re-revision of 10 Dec. 1976) 260
19 Sept. A.D.28-The Year of Technical Breakthroughs (LRH ED 298 INT)
482
19 Sept. The End of Endless Drug RDs (revised-see Vol. XIl) 484
19 Sept. The End of Endless Drug Rundowns-Drug Rundown Repair List
(revised-see Vol. XII) 485
20 Sept. Dianetics-Basic Definitions (re-revision of 23 Apr. 1969)
59
20 Sept. Dianetic Use (re-revision of 24 Apr. 1969) 64
20 Sept. High TA in Dianetics (revision of 28 Apr. 1969) 71
20 Sept. Auditing Speed (revision of 22 July 1969) 94
20 Sept. Drugs, Aspirin and Tranquilizers (re-revision of 17 Oct. 1969)
104
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
20 Sept. Assists (C/S Series 49RB) (re-revision of 5 July 1971) 150
20 Sept. Assessment and How to Get the Item (NED Series 4R)
(revision of 18 June 1978) 350
20 Sept. LX List Handling 489
20 Sept. NED Auditor Analysis Checklist (NED Series 19, C/S Series 103)
492
21 Sept. Case Supenising New Era Dianetics Folders (re-revision of
9 May 1969) 75
21 Sept. How Not to Erase (re-revision of 28 May 1969) 80
21 Sept. C/S-How to Case Supervise Dianetics Folders (re-revision of
28 June 1969) 82
21 Sept. Dianetics and Illness (re-revision of 19 July 1969) 91
21 Sept. Case Folder Analysis, New Era Dianetics (re-revision of 9 Aug.
1969) 100
21 Sept. Dianetic Erasure (re-revision of 27 Mar. 1971) 130
21 Sept. L3RF-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List (re-revision of
11 Apr. 1971) 135
21 Sept. Assist Summary (re-revision of 11 July 1973) 215
22 Sept. Dianetics, Beginning a Pc on (C/S Series 54RA, NED Series 8R)
(re-revision of 28 July 1971) 155
22 Sept. Preclear Checklist (NED Series 16R) (revision of 23 June 1978)
365
22 Sept. Original Assessment Sheet (NED Series 5R) (revision of
24 June 1978) 367
22 Sept. Relief Rundown (NED Series 10R) (revision of 3 July 1978)
400
22 Sept. Second Original Assessment (NED Series 12R) (revision of
4 July 1978) 401
5 Oct. More On Drugs (revision of 26 Aug. 1978) 453
6 Oct. Glossary of C/S Terms (C/S Series 12RA) (revision of 25 June
1970) 116
9 Oct. Somatics-How to Tell Terminals and Opposition Terminals
(reissue of 8 Nov. 1962 revised 5 Sept. 1978) 10
9 Oct. An Instant F/N Is a Read (reissue of 20 Sept. 1978) 487
11 Oct. The Preassessment List (NED Series 4-1) (reissue of 11 July
1978) 414
21 Oct. Modern Repetitive Prepchecking (revision of 7 Sept. 1978)
469
4 Nov. LXI (Conditions) (reissue of 9 Aug. 1969 revised 21 Aug. 1978)
99
12 Nov. Word Clearing Definitions (W/C Series 59R) (revision of
23 Mar. 1978) 334
Subject Index 500
Alphabetical List of Titles 566
Cancellations and Revisions 568
LONG CONTENTS
HCO B 20 May 1959 KNOW TO MYSTERY STRAIGHT WIRE FOR EXTREME CASES, 1
Know to Mystery Scale expanded, 1
HCO B 3 May 1962R ARC BREAKS-MISSED WITHHOLDS, 2
All ARC breaks stem from missed withholds, 2
Picking up missed withholds keeps pc in session, 2
Pc manifestations cured by asking for missed withholds, 3
Missed withhold commands, 4
HCO B 28 June 1962R DIRTY NEEDLES-HOW TO SMOOTH OUT NEEDLES, 6
Reasons for dirty needles, 6
HCO B 12 Sept. 1962R SECURITY CHECKS AGAIN, 8
Security Check by rock slam, 8
HCO B 8 Nov. 1962R SOMATICS-HOW TO TELL TERMINALS AND OPPOSITION
TERMINALS, 10
Definitions of important terms, 10
Testing for the character of an item, 12
Ways of asking for terminal and opposition terminal, 12
Using Tiger Drill buttons, 12
The line plot, 13
HCO B 30 Dec. 1962R ROUTINES 2-12 & 2-10-CASE ERRORS-POINTS OF
GREATEST IMPORTANCE, 14
Auditing errors, 14
The errors of Routine Two, 15
Auditor responsibility, 16
Duration of process, 16
No auditing, 16
Failure to save records, 17
Failing to find R/Ses on List One, 17
Representing an R/Sing item, 18
Oppose RIs, 18
Incomplete lists, 19
Wrong way oppose, test for, 20
Lists that won't complete, 20
Long long lists, 21
Case remedy, 23
HCO B 8 June 1963R THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS-BULLETIN 2-HANDLING THE TIME TRACK, 25
Reasons why some cannot run engrams on pcs, 25
Three ways to move a time track, 25
Charge and the time track, 27
State of Case Scale, 27
Charge, 28
Auditing theory of charge erasure, 29
HCO B 10 Mar. 1964 BASIC AUDITING-NON-READING METERS-
METER FLINCH, 31
Reasons a pc does not read on a meter, 31
Invalidation read of a GPM, 32
Pc who is consistently flinching, 32
HCO PL 12 Oct. 1966 EXAMINATIONS, 32
Students are not to discuss examinations with other students, 32
Line for student complaints concerning an examination, 32
HCO B 23 Aug. 1968 ARBITRARIES, 33
Effect of entering any arbitrary into any line, 33
What you know when the needle on an E-Meter read, 33
Standard tech has absolutely no arbitraries, 33
HCO B 23 Aug. 1968 WORKABILITY OF TECH, 34
Quality of technology, 34
Percentage of successes using standard tech actions, 34
HCO B 26 Aug. 1968 THE CLASS VIII COURSE, 35
What the Class VIII Course will teach, 35
What the course will include, 35
HCO B 10 Sept. 1968 CASE SUPERVISOR-ADMIN IN AUDITING, 36
Case Supenisor being presented with lousy admin, 36
No report gets liability, 36
Case Supenisor does not see the pc, 36
Case Supenisor does not talk to the auditor, 36
HCO B 10 Sept. 1968 FLUNKS, 37
Most common goofs made by auditors, 37
HCO B 10 Sept. 1968 "STANDARD" TECH DATA, 38
Green Form is done by handling every read, 38
Random auditing should not be done, 38
Ruds and reads, 38 False reads in ruds, 38
HCO B 10 Sept. 1968 VALENCE SHIFTER, 39
List question, 39
"Detached" lower grade case, 39
HCO B 11 Sept. 1968 C/S INSTRUCTIONS, 40
Standard action for an old-timer, 40
Standard one-time action for a Section III OT, 40
HCO B 15 Sept. 1968 PC LOOKING OR CONTINUALLY FEELING TIRED, 41
M/W/H gives a nattery critical aspect, 41
Handling a pc who feels tired, 41
HCO B 15 Sept. 1968 THE FIRST THING I LEARNED ABOUT TEACHING A
CLASS VIII AUDITOR, 41
Auditor who thinks he can fly before he can even creep, 41
HCO B 16 Sept. 1968 END PHENOMENA, 42
Phenomena of pc occurs after phenomena of meter, 42
Precise instant to tell the pc it's an F/N, 42
Cutting the pc's comm, 42
HCO B 22 Sept. 1968 REHABS, 43
Rehabbing no longer used processes, 43
Count the number of times released, 43
HCO B 23 Sept. 1968 VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING, 44
Rudiments are usually not necessary in correcting a list, 44
How to correct a list, 44
Four basic reasons for a wrong list, 44
HCO B 26 Sept. 1968 THE STUDY OF THE "WELL DONE" LRH C/S
FOLDER, 44
Difference between making auditors and not making auditors, 44
HCO B 29 Sept. 1968 LIST CORRECTION, 45
Questions for correcting a recently done list, 45
HCO B 4 Oct. 1968 ADVANCE COURSES, 46
Issuing an Advance Course to anyone requires C/S OK, 46
Running Advance Courses on people with out ruds, 46
HCO B 4 Oct. 1968 PRE-OTS, 46
Putting in Suppress and false reads on each rud, 46
HCO B 5 Oct. 1968 ARC BREAK NEEDLE, 47
F/N with bad indicators is an ARC break needle, 47
Real F/N has one or more GIs, 47
HCO B 21 Oct. 1968R FLOATING NEEDLE, 48
Floating needle defined, 48
Indicating floating needle, 48
ARC break needle, 48
HCO B 1 Nov. 1968 OVERT-MOTIVATOR DEFINITIONS, 49
Definitions of overt, motivator and overt of omission, 49
False motivators, 49
False overts, 49
Cases that go into imaginary cause, 49
HCO B 5 Dec. 1968 UNRESOLVING CASES, 50
Mechanism of PTS, 50
Why the PTS case does not respond to processing, 50
HCO B 15 Dec. 1968RA L4BRA-FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING ERRORS, 51
HCO B 2 Apr. 1969RA DIANETIC ASSISTS, 55
Medical treatment of "insanity," 55
Touch Assist, 55
Contact Assist, 55
Auditing Assist, 55
Handling of illness, 56
Physically sick persons divide into two classes, 56
Dianetic auditing speeds up healing from illness or injury, 57
First research on Dianetics, 57
HCO B 17 Apr. 1969R DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION, 58
Dianetics is done differently than Scientology, 58
Keep Dianetics to Dianetics, 58
HCO B 23 Apr. 1969RA DIANETICS-BASIC DEFINITIONS, 59
Erasure, lock, secondary and engram defined, 59
Cause of psychosomatic ills, 59
Somatic and misemotion defined, 60
Pc who is ill needs Dianetics, 60
Run what is offered, don't force the pc, 60
Time track, pleasure moment, black field and invisible field defined,
61
Key-out vs. erasure, 61
EP of a chain and calling F/Ns in Dianetics, 62
Multiple illness, 62
Chain, automatic bank, basic, unburdening, basic basic, valence and
ally defined, 62
What assess means in Dianetics, 63
HCO B 24 Apr. 1969RA DIANETIC USE, 64
Illegal to cure illness, 64
Dianetics used for pastoral counseling is completely legal, 64
Correct procedure for ill pcs wanting auditing, 65
Examples of use of Dianetics, 65
Dianetics and Scientology, 66
HCO B 24 Apr. 1969R DIANETIC RESULTS, 68
Dianetics vs. Scientology, 68
Dianetic results are a well body and a being happy with it, 68
Scientology results are a free, powerful and immortal being, 68
HCO B 26 Apr. 1969R SOMATICS, 69
Chains are held together by one similar awareness, 69
Never assess medical terms or symptoms, 69
Landing the real engram every time using preassessment procedure, 70
HCO B 28 Apr. 1969R HIGH TA IN DIANETICS, 71
High TA in Dianetics means an engram too late on the chain to erase is in
restimulation, 71
TA behavior on engram chains, 71
HCO B 7 May 1969R FLOATING NEEDLE, 72
Floating needle defined, 72
Indicating floating needle, 72
HCO B 8 May 1969 IMPORTANT STUDY DATA, 73
Number of times over the materials equals certainty and results, 73
HCO B 8 May 1969R TEACHING THE DIANETICS COURSE, 74
Principles of teaching Dianetics auditors, 74
HCO B 9 May 1969RA CASE SUPERVISING NEW ERA DIANETICS
FOLDERS, 75
R3RA exactly followed gives uniform results, 75
Dianetic auditor requirements, 75
Dianetic errors, 76
HCO B 11 May 1969R METER TRIM CHECK, 77
Meter trim check procedure, 77
HCO B 18 May 1969R ERASURE, 78
Erase a picture, not only the somatic, 78
What erasure depends on, 78
HCO B 23 May 1969R AUDITING OUT SESSIONS-NARRATIVE VERSUS
SOMATIC CHAINS, 79
Running a session out using Narrative R3RA, 79
HCO B 28 May 1969RA HOW NOT TO ERASE, 80
Grinding in Dianetics, 80
Forcing the pc to go earlier than basic on the chain, 80
Basic facts concerning erasure, 80
Asking "solid or erasing," 80
Blowing an engram by inspection, 81
There's no substitution for actually understanding what's going on, 81
Earlier beginning, 81
HCO B 28 June 1969RA C/S-HOW TO CASE SUPERVISE DIANETICS FOLDERS, 82
Four possible actions for a New Era Dianetics C/S to take, 82
Two types of cases, 83
Dianetic "oddity" case, 83
Roller-coaster after Dianetic auditing, 84
Sick pcs are sent directly to a medico, 84
Handling the "insane" pc, 84
C/S procedure on a New Era Dianetics folder, 84
Auditing result is the result of a team, 85
HCO B 17 July 1969RB NEW ERA DIANETICS COMMAND TRAINING
DRILLS, 86
TR 100: Preassessment Procedure on a Doll, 87
TR 100-A: Preassessing a Doll Coached, 87
TR 101: R3RA to a Wall, 88
TR 102: Auditing a Doll, 88
TR 103: Auditing on a Doll Coached, 89
TR 104: R3RA Coached and Bullbaited, 89
HCO B 19 July 1969RA DIANETICS AND ILLNESS, 91
Dianetics forbidden on Clears and OTs, 91
Illnesses can be physical; if so medical action is the first action, 91
Illness is a composite somatic, 92
Handling a continual or recurring illness, 92
HCO B 21 July 1969 ONE-HAND ELECTRODES, 93
One-hand electrode hides floating needles, 93
HCO B 22 July 1969R AUDITING SPEED, 94
Failed sessions caused by lack of speed, 94
Fast pcs require fast auditors, 94
HCO B 24 Jub 1969R SERIOUSLY ILL PCS, 95
Medical examination, 95
Medical care, 95
Dianetic auditing, 95
HCO B 2 Aug. 1969R "LX" LISTS, 96
The three "LX" Lists, 96
End phenomena, 96
Use of lists, 97
HCO B 3 Aug. 1969R LX2-EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST, 98
HCO B 9 Aug. 1969R LX1 (CONDITIONS), 99
HCO B 9 Aug. 1969RA CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS, NEW ERA
DIANETICS, 100
The nine things that can go wrong in a New Era Dianetics session, 100
Pc repair, 101
Out ruds, 101
Handling of physically ill pcs, 102
Special cases, 102
Original Assessment Form, 102
Pcs who go exterior in Dianetics, 103
HCO B 17 Oct. 1969RA DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS, 104
Actions of aspirin and other pain depressants, 104
Drugs make auditing very difficult, 105
Cycle of drug restimulation of pictures, 105
Drugs chemically inhibit the creation of mental image pictures but
inhibit as well the erasure, 105
Drug taker applying for auditing, 105
What a full drug handling program includes, 106
HCO B 5 Nov. 1969R LX3 (ATTITUDES), 107
HCO B 15 Nov. 1969R CASE SUPERVISION-AUDITING AND RESULTS, 108
New Era Dianetics results, 108
Major errors of New Era Dianetics, 108
New Era Dianetics auditing is so simple that it demonstrates cleanly
whether the person can audit or not, 108
Value of being a proven Dianetic auditor, 108
HCO B 23 Nov. 1969RB STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE, 110
Student Rescue Intensive steps, 110
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive steps, 111
Promoting Student Rescue Intensives, 111
When a Student Rescue Intensive is run, 111
HCO B 21 Dec. 1969 SOLO AUDITING AND R6EW, 112
Troubles on Solo courses, 112
Solo Course R6EW requisites, 113
HCO B 27 Feb. 1970 GROUP ENGRAM PROCESS, 114
Steps of Group Engram Process, 114
HCO B 11 Mar. 1970 IMPORTANT NOTE ON GROUP ENGRAM
INTENSIVE, 115
Complete an auditing cycle once begun, 115
HCO B 15 Mar. 1970 DOUBLE FOLDER DANGER, 115
Solo and auditing folder must be to hand when C/Sing, 115
C/S only with all folders to hand, 115
C/S Series 12RA
HCO B 25 June 1970RA GLOSSARY OF C/S TERMS, 116
Recovery Program, 116
Progress Program, 116
Advance Program, 116
Expanded Lower Grades, 116
Dianetic Clear, 117
Classification Chart, 117
Quickie Grades, 117
Dianetic pcs, 117
C/S Series 13RA
HCO B 30 June 1970RA VIII ACTIONS, 118
"Old" processes are not cancelled by new ones, 118
Basics are not cancelled by later developments, 118
VIII auditing, 119
Resistive cases, 119
When to use GF 40, 120
Purpose and validity of OT IV Rundown, 120
Case Supervisor actions, 121
HCO B 15 July 1970R UNRESOLVED PAINS, 122
Two reasons for pain not resolved on Dianetics, 122
The answer to a persistent or recurring somatic, 122
Toothache, 123
C/S Series 15R
HCO B 16 Aug. 1970R GETTING THE F/N TO EXAMINER, 124
Unflat engram chains and high TA, 124
Causes and solutions for high TA at Exam after F/N in session, 124
How to program a pc who has a chronic somatic, 125
Dianetic pc pattern at Examiner, 125
High TA and illness, 126
Low TA and exams, 126
HCO B 11 Sept. 1970 SOLO ASSISTS, 127
Actions a Solo auditor may not do, 127
Progress and advance actions may not be done Solo, 127
C/S Series 18R
HCO B 11 Sept. 1970R CHRONIC SOMATIC, DIANETIC HANDLING OF, 127
Dianetic handling of chronic somatic is given in C/S Series 15, 127
C/S Series 29R
HCO B 8 Mar. 1971R CASE ACTIONS, OFF LINE, 128
Life knocking ruds out faster than they can be audited in, 128
Pc physically ill before next session, 128
Self-auditing, 128
Coffee shop auditing, 128
Touch and Contact Assists interrupting a general course of auditing,
often to no F/N, 128
Study rundowns, 129
Illegal patch-ups, 129
People talking about their cases, 129
Advanced Course material insecurity, 129
Illegal drug use, 129
HCO B 27 Mar. 1971RA DIANETIC ERASURE, 130
Dianetic errors that prevent erasure, 130
Running a non-reading item, 130
How to handle high TA at session start, 130
Running a narrative item, 130
Handling a pc who has exteriorized but hasn't had an Interiorization
RD, 130
Failing to ask for DEF again when the pc says "It's erased" but TA is
still high, 130
Not asking for an earlier incident, 130
Auditing a pc under protest will cause the TA to stay up and no F/N and
erasure, 131
Ending off a chain or engram at the first sight of an F/N, 131
C/S Series 33RA-1
HCO B 5 Apr. 1971 TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS, 132
Bypassed flows and mass, 132
The source of high TA, 132
Liability of rehabs, 132
Massy thetans, 132
Getting in all flows, 133
High TA, 133
Pc not in trouble, 133
Pc in trouble, 134
Running Zero Flows, 134
Getting in Zero Flows-rehab or run, 134
Results of All Flows Rundown, 134
HCO B 11 Apr. 1971RC L3RF-DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST, 135
C/S Series 36RC
HCO B 21 Apr. 1971RC DIANETICS, 141
Why the TRs exist, 141
TRs are for use in the session itself, 141
How to rehab a Dianetic chain, 141
Handling flubbed chains, 142
Using the new L3RE, 142
Erased chains can be overrun, 143
Firefights between auditor and pc, 143
Use Quads on new, never audited before pcs, 143
C/S responsibility, 144
Putting a pc at risk, 144
Introducing Full Flow Dianetics, 144
HCO B 26 Apr. 1971 SOLO COGNITIONS, 145
What cognitions in Solo auditing depend upon, 145
C/S Series 41RA
HCO B 9 June 1971RA C/S TIPS, 146
Out lists handled before ruds, 146
No read auditors, 146
Cramming on flubs, 146
Correct use of R-Factors, 147
Mixing starts of sessions, 147
High TA and ARC breaks, 147
Low TA quits, 147
Exam F/Ns after flubs, 147
C/S is handling cases on the via of an auditor, 148
Higher levels do not solve lower level failures, 148
C/S expertise, 148
Word Clearing Series ERA
HCO B 29 June 1971RA STEPS TO SPEED STUDENT PRODUCT FLOW, 149
Supervising at a below F/N level, 149
Steps for handling non-F/Ning students, 149
C/S Series 49RB
HCO B 5 July 1971RB ASSISTS, 150
Three types of assists, 150
Contact Assist, 150
Dianetic Assist, 150
Touch Assist, 151
How to audit an unconscious pc, 151
Assist rules, 151
C/S Series 51R
HCO B 17 July 1971R OUT OF VALENCE, 152
OCA/APA graph drops explained, 152
How to handle an out of valence pc, 152
HCO B 23 Jub 1971R ASSISTS, 153
Assist EP, 153
Injury Rundown, 153
Pc running a temperature, 153
Temperature Assist: Version A, 153
Temperature Assist: Version B. 154
C/S Series 54RA
New Era Dianetics Series 8R
HCO B 28 July 1971RA DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON, 155
Begin Dianetics with the Original Assessment Sheet, 155
What Dianetics handles and how to handle it with Dianetics, 155
HCO B 16 Aug. 1971R TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED, 157
Importance of TRs, 157
OT TR 0: Operating Thetan Confronting, 157
TR 0: Confronting Preclear, 158
TR 0: Bullbait, Confronting Bullbaited, 158
TR 1: Dear Alice, 159
TR 2: Acknowledgements, 159
TR 2t/2: Half Acks, 160
TR3: Duplicative Questions, 160
TR 4: Preclear Originations, 162
HCOB 8 Sept. 1971R CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS, 163
Class VIII Case Supervisor actions, 163
C/S Series 59R
HCOB 14 Sept. 1971R DIANETIC LIST ERRORS, 192
Dianetic list of somatics, pains, emotions, and attitudes can act as a
list under the meaning of the Laws of Listing and Nulling, 192
List errors are corrected by L4BRA, 192
Points a C/S must be alert to regarding listing, 192
HCO B 25 Sept. 1971RB TONE SCALE IN FULL, 193
Tone Scale expanded, 193
Know to Mystery Scale, 193
HCO B 24 Oct. 1971R FALSE TA, 194
Consequences of false TA, 194
E-Meter improperly trimmed gives a false TA position, 194
E-Meter discharged gives false TA, 195
One-hand electrode, 195
Moist hands give low TA, 195
Dry hands give high TA, 196
Arthritic hands give high TA, 196
Slack grip, 196
Can size, 196
Cold pc, 196
Late at night a pc's TA may be very high, 197
Rings on the pc's hands must always be removed, 197
Floating TA, 197
Rusty corroded cans, 197
Tight shoes, 197
HCO B 12 Nov. 1971RA FALSE TA ADDITION, 198
Cold cans, 198
Footplates, 198
Pcs who falsify TA, 198
HCO B 15 Feb. 1972R FALSE TA ADDITION 2, 199
Wrong ways to get a pc to read between 2.0 and 3.0 on an E-Meter, 199
Commonest sources of low and high TA, 199
HCO B 18 Feb. 1972R FALSE TA ADDITION 3, 200
The honesty of the auditor determines his results, 200
Low TAs, 200
HCO PL 19 Mar. 1972 C/SING OR AUDITING WITHOUT FOLDER STUDY, 202
C/S and auditor penalties, 202
Payment of bonuses to C/Ses and auditors, 202
HCO PL 4 Apr. 1972R ETHICS AND STUDY TECH, 203
Basic Why of the majority of cases of post non-performance, 203
Ethics actions for violations of study tech and Word Clearing tech, 203
Axiom 28 (amended), 204
LRH ED 176 INT AUDITOR RECOVERY, 205
Recovering auditors who have left but are still in the area, 205
Handling auditors who want to leave the org, 205
Handling auditors who are not getting out their hours, 205
Executive Series 12
HCO PL 3 May 1972R ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES, 207
Danger Rundown, 3 May PL, 207
Definition of executive, 207
Responsibility of executives to handle out-ethics, 207
Ethics and organizations, 207
Examples of ethics offenses, 208
Technical aspect of out-ethics, 208
Danger Rundown steps, 209
C/S Series 81RA
HCO B 16June 1972RA AUDITOR'S RIGHTS MODIFIED, 213
Major Why of falling hours, incomplete programs and other confusions,
213
Auditor's right to choose pcs modified, 213
"Dog pcs" are problems in repair, 213
Stats of C/Ses and auditors, D of P and Dir of Tech Services, 214
The road to truth is begun with honesty, 214
HCO B 11 July 1973RB ASSIST SUMMARY, 215
Giving assists to Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, 215
Medical examination and treatment and assists, 216
Causes of predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of injury and
illness, 216
Physical facts of injuries, illnesses and stresses, 216
Don't neglect giving assists, 217
Don't handle injuries with Touch Assists only, 217
Actions of ministers, 217
Assist summary steps, 217
Drug "five days" rule need not apply to assists, 218
Assist given over drugs, how to handle later, 218
Pc illness during grade auditing, 218
There is no conflict between minister and medical doctor, 220
HCO PL 16 Nov. 1973 STUDY TECH & POST, 221
Penalties for violations of study tech, 221
HCO B 23 Nov. 1973RA DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA, 222
TA depends on normally moist hands, 222
Use of hand cream for dry hands, 222
Use of anti-perspirants for wet hands, 223
F/N and false TA, 223
Conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA, 223
Expanded Dianetics Series 21R
HCO B 28 Mar. 1974R EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE
THE ORIGINAL LECTURES-CANCELLATION, 224
Expanded Dianetics Series 22RA
HCO B 23 Apr. 1974RA EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES, 225
Ex Dn set-up checklist, 225
C/S Series 93RA
HCO B 31 Aug. 1974RA NEW GRADE CHART, 226
Changes in the Grade Chart, 226
Drug Rundown and Life Repair, 226
Quad vs. Expanded Grades, 226
Expanded Dianetics, 226
Grade II, 227
Solo set-ups, 227
The full list of grades showing where the various RDs now offered fit,
227
The Grade Chart and programming, 228
HCO B 1 Nov. 1974RA ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS, 229
Definition of rock slam, 229
Rock slammers, 229
Checklist to assist identification of R/Sers, 230
Pcs who R/S, 231
Rock slammer is different from someone with a rock slam, 231
HCO B 16 Jan. 1975R PAST LIFE REMEDIES, 232
Imaginary incidents, 232
Another Past Life Remedy, 232
Drugs can prevent going backtrack, 233
Pc in recent shock of having died won't go backtrack, 233
Remedy for invalidation of past lives, 233
Children as cases, 233
Unburdening cases of children, 234
How to handle pc stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books, 234
Scientology Review action to make pc go backtrack, 234
HCO B 23 Apr. 1975R VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA, 235
Vanishing cream doesn't work, 235
Hand creams for dry hands, 235
A note on footplates, 235
False TA handling, 235
False TA must be handled before session, 235
HCO B 10 Aug. 1976R R/SES, WHAT THEY MEAN, 238
Definition of rock slam, 238
"Rock slam" can be caused by rings on the pc's fingers, 238
Always report a rock slam in the auditing report, 239
Recognizing a rock slam, 239
Two things underlie insanity, 240
One rock slam doesn't make a psychotic, 240
When R/Ses most easily turn on, 240
How you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is handled, 241
What does handle an R/S, 241
Expanded Dianetics handling of R/Ses, 241
What to do when you see an R/S, 242
HCO B 20 Oct. 1976 PTS DATA, 244
What complete PTS handling would consist of, 244
HCO PL 20 Oct. 1976R PTS DATA, 245
What complete PTS handling would consist of, 245
HCO B 20 Oct. 1976 PTS HANDLING, 246
PTS handlings that "didn't work" or "still PTS," 246
First pilot, 246
Second pilot, 246
False PTSness, 247
HCO PL 23 Oct. 1976 INTERNESHIP AND HGC, 247
[CANCELLED]
HGC auditor must have done the interneships for his class, 247
C/S Series 96R
HCO B 24 Oct. 1976R DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS, 248
The "prepared lists" system, 248
The only reason for prepared lists not working, 248
Qual "OK to Audit" Checksheets, 248
A C/S must know what lists to use, 249
Prepared lists for preclears, 249
Prepared lists for students, 250
Prepared lists for staffs, 251
Confidential and AO lists, 251
Repair List for Prepared Lists, 252
Word lists for prepared lists, 252
Translated lists for non-English speaking orgs, 252
C/S Series 97
HCO B 26 Oct. 1976 AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF, 254
Ways of falsifying an auditing report, 254
Spotting falsified auditing reports, 254
Penalty for knowingly falsifying an auditing report, 255
C/S Series 98
HCO B 28 Oct. 1976 AUDITING FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN
COMPLETENESS, 256
Commonest omissions from folders, 256
Committee of Evidence for loss of a pc's folder and omissions from a
pc's folder, 257
HCO B 6 Dec. 1976 ILLEGAL PCS, ACCEPTANCE OF-HIGH CRIME
BULLETIN, 259
Committee of Evidence for C/Sing or accepting for processing an illegal
pc, 259
Who is an illegal pc, 259
Special petition may be made to the Guardian Office, 259
C/S Series 99RA
HCO B 10 Dec. 1976RA SCIENTOLOGY F/N AND TA POSITION, 260
Correct procedure for out of range F/Ns, 260
Sample clean up C/S for pcs who have had F/Ns disregarded or bypassed,
261
Dianetic F/Ns, 262
Power F/Ns, 262
Word Clearing Series 55
HCO B 10 Jan. 1977 HOW TO WIN WITH WORD CLEARING, 263
TRs and metering apply to Word Clearing, 263
The only times Word Clearing would seem to fail, 263
Remedy for being word cleared on an area without a resolution of the
original difficulty, 263
HCO PL 10 Jan. 1977 ETHICS AND WORD CLEARING, 264
Court of Ethics for faulty Word Clearing, 264
HCO B 13 Jan. 1977RA HANDLING A FALSE TA, 265
Examples of auditors mishandling false TA, 265
False TA is in the physical universe not the pc's think or bank, 266
Basics behind finding a false TA and remedying it, 266
HCO B 21 Jan. 1977RA FALSE TA CHECKLIST, 267
HCO B 22 Jan. 1977 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT, 273
The dominating factor of tech being in, 273
HCO B 24 Jan. 1977 TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP, 274
Issues by others that alter-ised tech, 274
List of incorrect procedures or data found to have been issued, 274
When OT VIII will be released, 287
HCO B 26 Jan. 1977 FOOTPLATES USE FORBIDDEN, 288
Use of footplates is forbidden, 288
Issues that cover how to handle a false TA, 288
HCO B 27 Jan. 1977 AUDITOR RECOVERY, 289
HCO B 27 Jan. 1977 Auditor Recovery is cancelled, 289
HCO B 30 Jan. 1977 FALSE TA DATA, 290
List of references on false TA handling, 290
C/S Series 100
HCO B 5 Feb. 1977 JOKERS AND DEGRADERS, 291
People who do not understand something occasionally make fun of it, 291
Categories jokers or degraders fall into, 291
The joker is advertising his symptoms, 292
HCO B 17 Feb. 1977R COURSE NECESSITIES, 293
List of materials added to checksheets, 293
HCO B 24 Feb. 1977 EXPANDED DIANETICS CASES, 294
One does fully and completely complete Expanded Dianetics cases, 294
HCO B 1 Mar. 1977 CANCELLATION OF INTEGRITY PROCESSING
HCOBs, 295
List of cancelled Integrity Processing HCOBs, 295
HCO B 1 Mar. 1977 CONFESSIONAL FORMS, 296
Never subtract anything from a Confessional, 296
Writing up an additional list, 296
HCO B 1 Mar. 1977 FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS, 297
What withholds add up to, 297
Straightening out somebody on a moral code, 297
Formula for making up a Confessional, 298
Rule for finding a fruitful area for a Confessional, 299
HCO B 1 Mar. 1977 A VALID CONFESSIONAL, 300
Reissue of a circa 1965 Confessional, 300
HCO B 8 Mar. 1977R POWER CHECKLIST, 302
C/S checklist on folders of preclears onto Power, 302
Grade Chart points for giving Ex Dn, 303
Expanded Grades is not a requisite for Power, 303
Expanded Dianetics Series 25
HCO B 16 Mar. 1977 THE GAMBLER, 304
An obsessive gambler is a psychotic, 304
Life isn't real to a psychotic gambler, 304
HCO B 27 Mar. 1977 PROGRAMMING OF EXPANDED DIANETICS, 305
Expanded Dianetics audits the pc at cause, 305
PTS handling and Expanded Dianetics, 305
Expanded Dianetics should be a fully completed cycle of action and not
bit and piece, 305
HCO B 5 Apr. 1977 EXPANDED GRADES, 307
When Expanded Grades can be done, 307
A typical and ideal program for a pc, 307
Expanded Grades is not a requisite for Power but Quad Grades are, 307
HCO B 11 Apr. 1977 LIST ERRORS-CORRECTION OF, 308
Verifying a list, 308
Nulling a list, 308
Reconstructing a list, 308
Self-listing, 308
List correction blow-up, 308
Lists not reading, 309
Use of L4BRA, 309
Handling an L4BRA, 309
Do it right, 309
HCO B 17 Apr. 1977 RECURRING WITHHOLDS AND OVERTS, 310
Definition of recurring withhold or overt, 310
Handling recurring withholds and overts, 310
HCO B 7 May 1977 LONG DURATION SEC CHECKING, 311
The person giving off very shallow overts, 311
The soft-spoken quiet "inoffensive" person, 311
HCO B 9 May 1977 FOREWORD OF EXPANDED DIANETICS COURSE, 312
Types of cases Expanded Dianetics handles, 312
Corrections to Expanded Dianetics, 312
DMSMH and Expanded Dianetics, 312
Expanded Dianetics Series 29
HCO B 9 May 1977 PSYCHOSIS, MORE ABOUT, 313
Below all psychotic conduct lies an evil purpose, 313
A true psychotic can be brilliant or stupid, 313
Man is basically good, 313
15% to 25% of living human beings are psychotic, 314
HCO B 31 May 1977 LSD-YEARS AFTER THEY HAVE "COME OFF OF"
LSD, 315
Characteristics of persons who have been on LSD, 315
The LSD apparently stays in the system, 315
Dealing with an LSD case, 315
HCO B 14 June 1977 PAID COMPLETIONS SIMPLIFIED, 316
Points for a major training service, 316
Points for a major processing service, 316
Points for minor (Division 6) services, 317
Bonus points, 317
Points for package sales, 317
Penalties, 317
Verification of paid comps and bonus computations, 318
HCO B 26 Sept. 1977 ART AND COMMUNICATION, 319
Two-way communication and art, 319
True art always elicits a contribution from those who view or hear or
experience it, 319
Innovation and originality, 319
Invalidative criticism, 320
Constructive criticism, 320
"Authorities" and art, 320
HCO B 4 Dec. 1977 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-
METER, 322
HCO B 6 Feb. 1978R LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM, 324
Who is an LSD case, 324
Theory of the Sweat Program, 324
Vitamins and minerals, 325
Diet, 325
Exercise, 325
The Sweat Program steps, 325
Results of the Sweat Program, 326
HCO B 6 Feb. 1978R-1 LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM-ADDITION, 327
Auditing of the pc while on the LSD Sweat Program, 327
Lack of a Sweat Program doesn't stop other auditing actions, 327
Sweat Program can also be done before a DRD, 327
HCO B 26 Feb. 1978 INTERNESHIPS VS. COURSES, 328
Courses and interneships are two separate and distinct activities, 328
Fast courses, 328
Fast interneships, 328
Interneships are not used to teach the course again, 328
Preventing interneships from becoming a long haul, 329
HCO PL 10 Mar. 1978 HGC PC APPLICATION FORM, 330
HCO B 18 Mar. 1978 POSTULATES AND ENGRAMS, 332
[CANCELLED]
What a full Dianetic EP consists of, 332
Asking the pc if he postulated anything in the basic incident, 332
HCO B 19 Mar. 1978 QUICKIE OBJECTIVES, 333
Tendency to quickie Objectives, 333
The only valid handling of Objectives, 333
Handling auditors who quickie Objectives, 333
Word Clearing Series 59R
HCO B 23 Mar. 1978R WORD CLEARING DEFINITIONS, 334
What you clear when clearing a definition of a word, 334
You want the definition which applies to the text you have been
reading, 334
Definition of a cleared word, 334
Word Clearing Series 58
HCO B 27 Mar. 1978 ETHICS PENALTY FOR WORD CLEARERS, 335
The reason Word Clearers cease to be Word Clearers, 335
The reason Word Clearing drops out in orgy 335
Penalty for a Word Clearer accumulating misunderstood words, 335
HCO B 3 Apr. 1978 TR DEBUG ASSESSMENT, 336
List to find the cause of a student's bog on doing TRs, 336
HCO B 8 Apr. 1978 AN F/N IS A READ, 338
[CANCELLED]
When an F/N is a read, 338
You can get four F/Ns off the same item, 338
An F/Ning assessment does not mean that the assessment is now all
reading, 338
HCO B 30 Apr. 1978 THE SWEAT PROGRAM FURTHER DATA, 339
Overweight, underweight and normal weight people, 339
Handling if a person is having trips during the program, 339
The best type of shoes to use for jogging, 340
Calcium and magnesium supplements can be taken, 340
Green vegetables are okay during the program, 340
Predigested protein is not the only protein that need be taken, 340
Salt and potassium, 340
Doing this program gradiently is very important, 341
Program oddity, 341
EP of the Sweat Program, 341
Cramming Series 17
HCO B 1 May 1978 TECH QUALITY, 342
Cramming should exist in every org, 342
TRs and metering will go a long ways to improve tech quality, 342
HCO B 26 May 1978 DIANETICS: URGENT COMMAND CHANGE, 343
Dianetics is being run using the wrong commands, 343
Moving through the incident, 343
Returning the pc to the incident, 343
Getting the postulates in the basic incident, 343
Narrative handling of incidents, 344
Emphasis on the proper running of Dianetics, 344
Cramming Series 18R
HCO B 2 June 1978R CRAMMING REPAIR ASSESSMENT LIST, 345
History of the Cramming Repair List, 345
Theory and use of the Cramming Repair List, 345
Assessment questions, 346
HCO B 15 June 1978 URGENT IMPORTANT, 349
The key to Expanded Dianetics, 349
Getting down to the basic evil purposes of the case, 349
HCO B 18 June 1978 ROUTINE 3-R COMMAND CHANGE, 349
Flow One, Step One command change, 349
New Era Dianetics Series 4R
HCO B 18 June 1978R ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM, 350
The New Era Dianetics original assessment items, 350
Original item, 350
Preassessment, 350
Listing for running items, 351
Preassessment steps, 352
Preassessment item, 352
Running item, 353
Finding the next running item, 353
Commands for the Original Assessment Sheet, 353
Handling somatics, 353
Handling narratives, 354
Running narratives, 354
Narrative assessment commands, 354
Assessing by asking the question as a question, 355
New Era Dianetics Series 3
HCO B 19 June 1978 OBJECTIVE ARC, 356
Commands of Objective ARC, 356
End phenomena of Objective ARC, 356
New Era Dianetics Series 15
HCO B 20 June 1978 IDENTITY RUNDOWN, 357
Getting a pc into valence, 357
Procedure of Identity Rundown, 357
End phenomena of Identity Rundown, 357
New Era Dianetics Series 1
HCO B 21 June 1978 NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES 1, 358
What New Era Dianetics is, 358
Student requirements for New Era Dianetics, 358
New Era Dianetics Series 2R
HCO B 22 June 1978R NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM
OUTLINE, 360
How Dianetics achieves its results, 360
End phenomena of Dianetic auditing, 360
New Era Dianetics full program outline, 360
New Era Dianetics Series 16R
HCO B 23 June 1978R PRECLEAR CHECKLIST, 365
Preclear Checklist is a Dianetic pc's advanced program, 365
Preclear Checklist form, 365
New Era Dianetics Series 5R
HCO B 24 June 1978R ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET, 367
When is the Original Assessment Sheet done, 367
Who does the Original Assessment Sheet, 367
Purpose of Original Assessment Sheet, 367
How is the Original Assessment Sheet done, 367
Neatness of Original Assessment Sheet, 367
Where does the Original Assessment Sheet go when completed, 367
Original Assessment Sheet, 368
New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
HCO B 26 June 1978RA ROUTINE 3RA-ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, 380
Lessons on engram running, 380
Early engram running, 381
R3RA revised by steps, 381
R3RA commands, 382
Postulate off equals erasure, 384
Going earlier, 384
Bouncxers, 384
Flows 2, 3 and 0, 385
Narrative- R3RA, 385
Secondaries, 387
Auditor knowledge of commands, 387
Speed of commands, 388
Pc interest, 388
Last incident found, 388
Completing chains, 388
F/Ns, 388
Blowing by inspection, 388
Ending session, 389
Ending Dianetics, 389
Special New Era Dianetics Rundown for OTs, 389
New Era Dianetics Series BRA
HCO B 28 June 1978RA R3RA COMMANDS, 390
Short list on R3RA commands, 390
Postulate off equals erasure, 391
Going earlier, 392
Bouncers, 392
Flow 2, 3 and 0 commands, 392
Secondaries are run with the same commands as R3RA, 394
New Era Dianetics Series 14
HCO B 29 June 1978 DISABILITY RUNDOWN, 395
Procedure for Disability Rundown, 395
When the rundown is complete, 395
New Era Dianetics Series 13
HCO B 1 July 1978 THE DIANETIC PREPARED ASSESSMENT RUNDOWN-
ACTION FOURTEEN, 396
Locating items that can be run R3RA, 396
Early assessment procedures, 396
Steps of the Dianetic Prepared Assessment Rundown, 396
New Era Dianetics Series 11
HCO B 2 July 1978 DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE, 399
Steps of the Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive, 399
When the intensive should be concluded, 399
New Era Dianetics Series lOR
HCO B 3 July 1978R RELIEF RUNDOWN, 400
Procedure of the Relief Rundown, 400
New Era Dianetics Series 12R
HCO B 4 July 1978R SECOND ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT, 401
When the Second Original Assessment Sheet is done, 401
Theory and use of the Second Original Assessment Sheet, 401
Handling the items on the Second Original Assessment Sheet, 402
HCO B 7 July 1978 DIANETIC F/Ns, 403
[CANCELLED]
Calling F/Ns in R3RA, 403
EP of a chain in Dianetics, 403
F/Ns are disregarded in Power, 403
HCO B 9 July 1978R DIANETIC CS-1, 404
Theory and use of the Dianetic CS-1, 404
Dianetic CS- 1 procedure, 405
Some of the references the auditor should be very familiar with, 407
Definitions sheet, 408
Dianetic CS-1 Word List, 412
New Era Dianetics Series 4-1
HCO B 11 July 1978 THE PREASSESSMENT LIST, 414
HCO B 14 July 1978R TYPICAL DIANETIC CHAIN, 416
Example of how a typical Dianetic chain might run, 416
HCO B 14 July 1978R A TYPICAL NARRATIVE ITEM, 417
Example of how a typical narrative item might run, 417
HCO B 15 July 1978 SCIENTOLOGY AUDITING CS-1, 418
Theory and use of the Scientology CS-1, 418
Scientology CS-1 procedure, 419
Clearing commands, 421
Clearing words on correction lists, 421
Definitions sheet, 422
New Era Dianetics Series 17
HCO B 19 July 1978 DIANETIC PERSISTENT F/Ns, 427
What you can do in the case of Dianetic persistent F/Ns, 427
New Era Dianetics Series 18
HCO B 20 July 1978 AFTER THE FACT ITEMS, 428
Definition of "after the fact" running item, 428
Example of an "after the fact" running item, 428
How to handle "after the fact" running items, 428
HCO B 21 July 1978 WHAT IS A FLOATING NEEDLE? 429
Definition of a floating needle, 429
HCO B 22 July 1978 ASSESSMENT TRs, 430
The right way to do an assessment, 430
Assessing with a statement's tone of voice, 430
C/S Series 101
HCO B 23 July 1978 LIST OF PERCEPTICS, 431
The 57 human perceptions, 431
HCO B 24 July 1978 DIANETIC REMEDIES, 433
Getting the pc to understand the commands and procedures of R3RA, 433
Pictures and Masses Remedy, 433
Automaticity of pictures, 434
Assessing for overts when pc goes anaten in session but there is no
evidence of unflat chains, 435
Imaginary incidents, 435
HCO B 2 Aug. 1978 CANCELLATION OF ISSUES, 436
List of cancelled Dianetic HCOBs with references to where correct data
can be obtained, 436
HCO B 5 Aug. 1978 INSTANT READS, 438
Correct definition of instant read, 438
HCO B 7 Aug. 1978 HAVINGNESS-FINDING AND RUNNING THE PC'S
HAVINGNESS PROCESS, 439
Final definition of Havingness, 439
What the position of a being on the Tone Scale is determined by, 439
Finding and running the pc's Havingness Process, 440
HCO B 9 Aug. 1978 NEW ERA DIANETICS-A REQUISITE FOR EXPANDED
DIANETICS, 441
New Era Dianetics full pc program must come before Expanded Dianetics,
441
HCO B 9 Aug. 1978 CLEARING COMMANDS, 442
Rules of clearing commands, 442
Violation of full and correct clearing of commands or assessment
questions is an ethics offense, 444
HCO B 11 Aug. 1978 RUDIMENTS-DEFINITIONS AND PATTER, 445
What a rudiment is used for, 445
Getting the F/N, 445
Handling ARC breaks, 446
Handling present time problems, 447
Handling missed withholds, 448
Use of Suppress button in ruds, 449
Use of False button in ruds, 449
End phenomena, 449
High or low TA, 449
References to further data on rudiments, 449
HCOB 11 Aug. 1978 MODEL SESSION, 450
Setting up for the session, 450
Start of session, 450
Rudiments, 450
Major action of the session, 450
Havingness, 451
End of session, 451
HCOB 21 Aug. 1978 RUNNING FLOWS THAT WON'T ERASE, 452
Handling when a flow won't erase in R3RA, 452
HCO B 26 Aug. 1978R MORE ON DRUGS, 453
The idea drug users are apparently sitting on, 453
Why Objectives work, 453
Effects of drugs, 453
HCO B 3 Sept. 1978 DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM, 454
The only valid definition of an R/S, 454
Definition of a dirty needle, 454
The difference between a rock slam and a dirty needle, 455
HCO B 5 Sept. 1978 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE, 456
Definition of service facsimile, 456
How the service facsimile becomes fixed, 457
Right/wrong, dominate and survive, 457
HCO B 6 Sept. 1978 FOLLOWING UP ON DIRTY NEEDLES, 459
Definition of a dirty needle, 459
Causes of dirty needles, 459
Dirty needles and rock slams, 459
Don't ignore dirty needles, 459
HCO B 6 Sept. 1978 SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS, 461
Service facsimile is a brother to R/Ses and evil intentions, 461
It isn't actually a facsimile at all, 461
Rock slams and service facsimiles, 461
More than one service fac per pc, 462
Finding service facs, 462
HCO B 6 Sept. 1978 ROUTINE THREE SC-A-FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE
HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS, 463
New echelon of service facsimile running, 463
Service facsimile handling revised by steps, 464
Full service facsimile procedure, 464
When listing for the service facsimile, 466
When running off the automaticity, 467
When to prepcheck, 467
Completing service facsimile handling with R3RA, 468
Ending service fac running, 468
HCO B 7 Sept. 1978R MODERN REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING, 469
Order of the 20 Prepcheck buttons, 469
Use of the buttons, 469
The only time Prepchecking cannot be done, 469
Prepcheck procedure, 470
HCO B 8 Sept. 1978 MINI LIST OF GRADE 0-IV PROCESSES, 471
Mini list of Grade 0-IV processes with references to what issues they
appear in, 471
HCO B 10 Sept. 1978 NED HIGH CRIME, 473
Persons must be certificate trained on NED to run it, 473
HCO B 12 Sept. 1978 DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTS, 473
NED or any Dianetics is not run on Clears or above or on Dianetic
Clears, 473
EP of the special NED Rundown for OTs, 473
HCO B 12 Sept. 1978 OVERRUN BY DEMANDING EARLIER THAN THERE
IS, 474
Overrun of basic, 474
Overrun of non-basic, 474
Dianetic auditor is not concerned with the amount of TA that he gets,
474
Effects of a lousy job of assessment, 475
HCO B 13 Sept. 1978 R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS AND NARRATIVE
R3RA-AN ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCE, 476
Asking for earlier beginning or earlier incident, 476
R3RA engram running by chains, 476
R3RA narrative running, 477
HCO B 13 Sept. 1978 CLEARS, OTS AND R/SES, 478
Clears or OTs who are R/Sing are not R/Sers, 478
NED Rundown for OTs can only be delivered at AOs and at Flag, 478
HCO PL 13 Sept. 1978 AN OLD POEM, 478
An old poem which has been newly adapted as policy, 478
HCO PL 15 Sept. 1978 CONFIDENTIALITY OF UPPER LEVEL
RUNDOWNS, 479
Rules to safeguard the materials of confidential rundowns and levels
and to prevent their unauthorized use or misuse, 479
HCO B 16 Sept. 1978 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE, 480
EP of a Dianetic chain is the postulate coming off, 480
Learn to recognize a postulate when you hear one, 480
LRH ED 298 INT A.D.28-THE YEAR OF TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGHS, 482
NED vs. NED for OTs, 482
OT VIII, 482
End of Endless Drug Rundowns, 482
Training-fast courses, 483
HCO B 19 Sept. 1978 THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RDS, 484
[REVISED]
Reason a Drug RD can not be run flat, 484
You can always find more drugs on the track, 484
Drug RD Repair List, 484
HCO B 19 Sept. 1978 THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS-DRUG
[REVISED] RUNDOWN REPAIR LIST, 485
HCO B 20 Sept. 1978 AN INSTANT F/N IS A READ, 487
Definition of instant F/N, 487
What a read means, 487
What an instant F/N on an item means, 487
The use of an F/N as a read, 488
HCO B 20 Sept. 1978 LX LIST HANDLING, 489
End phenomena of the LX Lists, 489
Procedure, 489
LX3 Attitudes, 489
LX2 Emotions, 490
LX1 Conditions, 490
220H, 490
New Era Dianetics Series 19
C/S Series 103
HCO B 20 Sept. 1978 NED AUDITOR ANALYSIS CHECKLIST, 492
Use of the NED Auditor Analysis Checklist, 492
When the C/S should order an auditor to have one, 492
How the checklist is done, 492
Parts of the checklist, 493
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Washington, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF MAY 20, 1959
(Cancels bulletins of March 31, 1959, and April 17, 1959)
KNOW TO MYSTERY STRAIGHT WIRE FOR EXTREME CASES
The Know to Mystery Scale expanded:
Not Know
Know
Look
Emotion
Effort
Think
Symbols
Eat
Sex
Mystery
Wait
Unconsciousness
To assess a case on the lower rungs of processing, ask pc, against an E-
Meter, what terminal could represent each of above, select that terminal
(object or person, never a condition) which changes needle action most and
run Overt-Withhold Straight Wire on it.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:mp
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 MAY 1962R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(This Bulletin has been revised to correct
the definition of dirty needle.
Revision in this type style.)
ARC BREAKS
MISSED WITHHOLDS
(HOW TO USE THIS BULLETIN:
WHEN AN AUDITOR OR STUDENT HAS TROUBLE WITH AN "ARC BREAKY PC" OR NO
GAIN, OR WHEN AN AUDITOR IS FOUND TO BE USING FREAK CONTROL METHODS OR
PROCESSES TO "KEEP A PC IN SESSION," THE HCO SEC, D OF T OR D OF P SHOULD
JUST HAND A COPY OF THIS BULLETIN TO THE AUDITOR AND MAKE HIM OR HER STUDY
IT AND TAKE AN HCO EXAM ON IT.)
After some months of careful observation and tests, I can state
conclusively that:
ALL ARC BREAKS STEM FROM MISSED WITHHOLDS.
This is vital technology, vital to the auditor and to anyone who wants
to live.
Conversely:
THERE ARE NO ARC BREAKS WHEN MISSED WITHHOLDS HAVE BEEN CLEANED UP.
By WITHHOLD is meant AN UNDISCLOSED CONTRA-SURVIVAL ACT.
By MISSED WITHHOLD is meant AN UNDISCLOSED CONTRA-SURVIVAL ACT WHICH
HAS BEEN RESTIMULATED BY ANOTHER BUT NOT DISCLOSED.
This is FAR more important in an auditing session than most auditors
have yet realized. Even when some auditors are told about this and shown it
they still seem to miss its importance and fail to use it. Instead they
continue to use strange methods of controlling the pc and oddball processes
on ARC breaks.
This is so bad that one auditor let a pc die rather than pick up the
missed withholds! So allergy to picking up missed withholds can be so great
that an auditor has been known to fail utterly rather than do so. Only
constant hammering can drive this point home. When it is driven home, only
then can auditing begin to happen across the world; the datum is that
important.
An auditing session is 50% technology and 50% application. I am
responsible for the technology. The auditor is wholly responsible for the
application. Only when an auditor realizes this can he or she begin to
obtain uniformly marvellous results everywhere.
No auditor now needs "something else," some odd mechanism to keep pcs
in session.
PICKING UP MISSED WITHHOLDS KEEPS PCS IN SESSION.
There is no need for a rough, angry ARC breaky session. If there is one
it is not the fault of the pc. It is the fault of the auditor. The auditor
has failed to pick up missed withholds.
As of now it is not the pc that sets the tone of the session. It is the
auditor. And the auditor who has a difficult session (providing he or she
has used standard technology,
Model Session, and can run an E-Meter), has one only because he or she
failed to ask for missed withholds.
What is called a dirty needle (an erratic agitation of the needle-not
limited in size-which is ragged, jerky, ticking, not sweeping and tends to
be persistent) is caused by missed withholds, not withholds.
Technology today is so powerful that it must be flawlessly applied. One
does his CCHs in excellent 2-way comm with the pc. One has his TRs, Model
Session and E-Meter operation completely perfect. And one follows exact
technology. And one keeps the missed withholds picked up.
There is an exact and precise auditor action and response for every
auditing situation, and for every case. We are not today beset by variable
approaches. The less variable the auditor's actions and responses, the
greater gain in the pc. It is terribly precise. There is no room for flubs.
Further, every pc action has an exact auditor response. And each of
these has its own drill by which it can be learned.
Auditing today is not an art, either in technology or procedure. It is
an exact science. This removes Scientology from every one of the past
practices of the mind.
Medicine advanced only to the degree that its responses by the
practitioner were standardized and the practitioner had a professional
attitude toward the public.
Scientology is far ahead of that today.
What a joy it is to a preclear to receive a completely standard
session. To receive a textbook session. And what gains the pc makes! And
how easy it is on the auditor!
It isn't how interesting or clever the auditor is that makes the
session. It's how standard the auditor is. Therein lies pc confidence.
Part of that standard technology is asking for missed withholds any
time the pc starts to give any trouble. This is, to a pc, a totally
acceptable control factor. And it totally smooths the session.
You have no need for and must not use any ARC break process. Just ask
for missed withholds.
Here are some of the manifestations cured by asking for missed
withholds.
1. Pc failing to make progress.
2. Pc critical of or angry at auditor.
3. Pc refusing to talk to auditor.
4. Pc attempting to leave session.
S. Pc not desirous of being audited (or anybody not desirous of being
audited).
6. Pc boiling off.
7. Pc exhausted.
8. Pc feeling foggy at session end.
9. Dropped havingness.
10. Pc telling others the auditor is no good.
11. Pc demanding redress of wrongs.
12. Pc critical of organizations or people of Scientology.
13. People critical of Scientology.
14. Lack of auditing results.
15. Dissemination failures.
Now I think you will agree that in the above list we have every ill we
suffer from in the activities of auditing.
Now PLEASE believe me when I tell you there is ONE CURE for the lot and
ONLY that one. There are no other cures.
The cure is contained in the simple question or its variations "Have I
missed a withhold on you"
THE COMMANDS
In case of any of the conditions 1 to 15 above ask the pc one of the
following commands and CLEAN THE NEEDLE OF ALL INSTANT READ. Ask the exact
question you asked the first time as a final test. The needle must be clean
of all instant reaction before you can go on to anything else. It helps the
pc if each time the needle twitches, the auditor says, "That" or "There"
quietly but only to help the pc see what is twitching. One doesn't
interrupt the pc if he or she is already giving it. This prompting is the
only use of latent reads in Scientology-to help the pc spot what reacted in
the first place.
The commonest questions:
"In this session, have I missed a withhold on you?"
"In this session have I failed to find out something?"
"In this session is there something I don't know about you?"
The best beginning rudiments withhold question:
"Since the last session is there something you have done that I
don't know about?"
Prepcheck Zero Questions follow:
"Has somebody failed to find out about you who should have?"
"Has anyone ever failed to find out something about you?"
"Is there something I failed to find out about you?"
"Have you ever successfully hidden something from an auditor?"
"Have you ever done something somebody failed to discover?"
"Have you ever evaded discovery in this lifetime?"
"Have you ever hidden successfully?"
"Has anyone ever failed to locate you?"
(These Zeros do not produce "What" questions until the auditor has
located a specific overt.)
When Prepchecking, when running any process but the CCHs, if any one of
the auditing circumstances in 1 to 15 above occurs, ask for missed
withholds. Before leaving any chain of overts in Prepchecking, or during
Prepchecking, ask frequently for missed withholds, "Have I missed any
withhold on you?" or as above.
Do not conclude intensives on any process without cleaning up missed
withholds.
Asking for missed withholds does not upset the dictum of using no O/W
processes in rudiments.
Most missed withholds clean up at once on two-way comm providing the
auditor doesn't ask leading questions about what the pc is saying. Two-way
comm consists of asking for what the meter showed, acknowledging what the
pc said and checking the meter again with the missed withhold question. If
pc says, "I was mad at my wife," as an answer, just
ack and check the meter with the missed withhold question. Don't say, "What
was she doing?"
In cleaning missed withholds do not use the Prepcheck system unless you
are Prepchecking. And even in Prepchecking, if the Zero is not a missed
withhold question and you are only checking for missed withholds amid other
activities, do it simply as above, by two-way comm, not by the Prepcheck
system.
To get auditing into a state of perfection, to get clearing general,
all we have to do is:
1. Know our basics (Axioms, scales, codes, the fundamental theory
about the thetan and the mind);
2. Know our practical (TRs, Model Session, E-Meter, CCHs,
Prepchecking and clearing routines).
In actual fact this is not much to ask. For the return is smooth
results and a far, far better world. An HPA/HCA can learn the data in 1
above and all but clearing routines in the material in 2. An HPA/HCA should
know these things to perfection. They are not hard to learn. Additives and
interpretations are hard to get around. Not the actual data and
performance.
__________
Knowing these things, one also needs to know that all one has to do is
clean the E-Meter of missed withholds to make any pc sit up and get audited
smoothly, and all is as happy as a summer dream.
__________
We are making all our own trouble. Our trouble is lack of precise
application of Scientology. We fail to apply it in our lives or sessions
and try something bizarre and then we fail too. And with our TRs, Model
Session and meters we are most of all failing to pick up and clean up
MISSED WITHHOLDS.
__________
We don't have to clean up all the withholds if we keep the missed
withholds cleaned up.
Give a new auditor the order to clean up "missed withholds" and he or
she invariably will start asking the pc for withholds. That's a mistake.
You ask the pc for missed withholds. Why stir up new ones to be missed when
you haven't cleaned up those already missed? Instead of putting out the
fire we pour on gunpowder. Why find more you can then miss when you haven't
found those that have been missed.
Don't be so confounded reasonable about the pc's complaints. Sure, they
may all be true BUT he's complaining only because withholds have been
missed. Only then does the pc complain bitterly.
__________
Whatever else you learn, learn and understand this please. Your
auditing future hangs on it. The fate of Scientology hangs on it. Ask for
missed withholds when sessions go wrong. Get the missed withholds when life
goes wrong. Pick up the missed withholds when staffs go wrong. Only then
can we win and grow. We're waiting for you to become technically perfect
with TRs, Model Session and the E-Meter, to be able to do CCHs and
Prepchecking and clearing techniques, and to learn to spot and pick up
missed withholds.
If pcs, organizations and even Scientology vanish from Man's view it
will be because you did not learn and use these things.
LRH:jw.rd.mf L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (�) 1962, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JUNE 1962R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style,
ellipsis indicates deletion)
DIRTY NEEDLES
How to Smooth Out Needles
Quite often a pc is found whose needle is jerky, random, gives many
prior and latent reads and goes into small scratchy patterns....
Such a needle is hard to read-and such a pc is a long way out of
session a lot of the time.
An auditor, seeing such a needle, and faced with the task of reading
the instant read through all these prior and latents and scratchy patterns,
tends to think in terms of heroic measures. It is "obvious" that this pc
has W/Hs, missed W/Hs, overts and secrets to end all reactive banks and
that the thing one ought to do is pick each one of these random needle
reactions up as soon as possible. BUT when you try to do this you find the
needle gets even more confused. It reads something all the time!
An extreme case of a dirty, random needle is not solved by any "fish
and fumble" or heroic measures.
The pc's needle reacts that way because of no confidence, which induces
a sort of auto-control in session which induces a dirty needle. Ability to
predict equals confidence.
The thing to do is give this pc about 3 sessions of rudiments and
havingness- just Model Session severely with no Q and A or added chitchat.
The sessions should be each one about one hour long.
All one does is do Model Session, getting the rudiments in carefully
exactly by the textbook. Use Model Session, HCO Bulletin 23 June 1962. Use
instant reads only as per HCO Bulletin 25th May 1962. And avoid any Q and A
as per HCO Bulletin 24 May 1962, section on "Double Questioning."
Use middle rudiments somewhere during the havingness session.
By doing this perfect, predictable textbook auditing session three
times on the pc, most of these prior and latent reads will drop out and.
the needle will look much cleaner. Why? Because the pc is off auto or in
session.
You can make a pc's needle get dirty and react to many odd thoughts by
the pc by doing the following:
1. Try to clean off prior reads and avoid instant reads in getting
ruds in (going against HCO Bulletin 25 May 1962).
2. Use a scruffy and ragged session pattern (going against HCO
Bulletin 23 June 1962).
3. Double question any rudiments question (as per HCO Bulletin 24
May 1962).
The pc's needle, even if very clean at the start and loose, will tighten
up, develop patterns and dirt if an auditor fails to use a textbook
session. This includes raw meat
that never heard of a textbook session. Raw meat particularly requires a
severely textbook session. Don't think because they're new they won't know.
And too much coffee shop type auditing can rough a needle.
A pc who has become unwilling to be audited is best cured by three
textbook flawless sessions of havingness as above. Don't plunge for what is
wrong. Just establish a standard of excellence the pc can predict. And up
will come the pc's confidence.
After the three sessions you can prepcheck or fish and fumble and get
things really clean. And providing you continue to use a textbook session,
the pc will get better and better.
If a pc still has a dirty needle with many prior reads after an auditor
has audited that pc three sessions, then we can conclude that that auditor:
1. Is not using HCO Bulletin 25 May 1962 in reading a meter,
2. Is not handling questions as per HCO Bulletin 24 May 1962, and
3. Is not using Model Session HCO Bulletin 23 June 1962.
There are no difficult pcs now. There are only auditors who do not give
textbook sessions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mdf
Copyright � 1962, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812 19th Street, N.W., Washington 9, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 SEPTEMBER AD12R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Only revision is the correction of the definition of a
Rock Slam, and Dirty Needle)
SECURITY CHECKS AGAIN
With the advent of Dynamic Assessment a new method of Security
Checking, far better than any previous Security Checking, has emerged.
Nothing in this bulletin of course detracts in any way from the value
of missed withholds, pulling missed withholds or handling missed withholds
on preclears or other persons in the organization.
If the following questions are asked of a person on a meter it can be
at once established whether or not this person will inadvertently,
covertly, or unknowingly attempt to ruin, wreck, stop and otherwise
interfere with an organization, Scientology, or an auditor. The questions
are as follows:
Consider committing overts against Scientology. Consider committing
overts against Ron. Consider committing overts against the organization.
Consider committing overts against me (the auditor).
It will be found that such a person has a goal which the person
considers to be impossible to achieve so long as any one of the above four
exist, therefore destructive actions will at all times be manifested no
matter how "constructive" they appear.
The rock slam produced must be decisive. By rock slam is meant the
crazy, irregular, left-right slashing motion of the needle on the E-Meter
dial. R/Ses repeat left and right slashes unevenly and savagely, faster
than the eye easily follows. The needle is frantic. The width of an R/S
depends largely on sensitivity setting. It goes from one-fourth inch to
whole dial. But it slams back and forth.
The action which should be taken if this condition is found to exist is
to suspend the person or otherwise put the person away from communication
lines until such time as the person's dynamic, item, and goal are found.
Sometimes it is almost enough merely to find the item, as the foolishness
of the conclusion that Scientology stands immediately and directly in their
road will appear to the preclear at that time.
By "A goal which is an overt against Scientology" is meant something
which the pc considers to be a goal which is an overt against. When you
finally see such goals appear they will not be apparent to the auditor as
overts. However, the pc so interprets them. For instance a pc may have a
fixed idea against any spiritual activity, interpreting it as a harsh
activity which forbids dancing, and the pc may have a goal to dance.
However the person's item lying above the goal to dance will be found to be
a spiritual group and this of course would make Scientology appear to the
person to be highly antipathetic to the goal to dance.
I cannot too strongly urge the fact that when the above occurs no
possible good will result until the dynamic, item, and goal are found.
Therefore this should be expedited. All care should be taken not to punish
the person unduly, but to carry on because often the person is unaware of
the destructiveness of his or her own actions.
In a marriage, if the husband were to place the wife on an E-Meter and
ask the question "Consider committing overts against me" and find a wide
rock slam imme
diately results, he will be then in total possession of what has been wrong
with his marriage. Similarly, a wife finding this manifestation on a
husband would also be informed.
The remedy in such a case is not to sack somebody, to shoot somebody,
to divorce somebody or take some drastic final action, because we now have
all the answer we need to resolve this and it will be found that as soon as
the person's goal has been found the condition of hostility will cease.
The rock slam produced must be at sensitivity 16 on the meter. If a
dirty needle occurs it is necessary to pull the person's missed withholds
because these obviously exist. This should not be neglected. By dirty
needle is meant an erratic agitation of the needle which is ragged, jerky,
ticking, not sweeping, and tends to be persistent. It is not limited in
size.
This is the new security programme. Any person responsible for
maintaining security in an organization or a home should perform the above
tests and take the remedial action.
I cannot too strongly urge that while this is absolute, or near as it
can be, and positive in its diagnosis, it is not permanent because we can
now clear, and clearing consists of doing away with the rock slam and not
the offending person.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jb .cden .mdf
Copyright � 1962. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 NOVEMBER AD12R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
REISSUED 9 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Reissued to correct typos)
SOMATICS
HOW TO TELL TERMINALS AND
OPPOSITION TERMINALS
It is important that a clearing auditor be able to distinguish pain
from sensation, terminals from opposition terminals, and to have the data
at the level of instant knowledge. To understand it less is to invite
serious errors in clearing. Failure to sort terminals from opposition
terminals can confuse the pc or even degrade the case. All a pc's somatics,
deformities and distortions proceed from terminals, opposition terminals
and combination terminals. Thus they are of vast importance to the pc and
the auditor.
DEFINITIONS
SOMATICS = This is a general word for uncomfortable physical
perceptions coming from the reactive mind. Its genus is early Dianetics and
it is a general, common package word, used by Scientologists to denote
"pain" or "sensation" with no difference made between them. To understand
the source of these feelings, one should have a knowledge of engrams,
ridges and other parts of the reactive bank. To the Scientologist anything
is a SOMATIC if it emanates from the various parts of the reactive mind and
produces an awareness of reactivity. Symbol SOM.
PAIN = Pain is composed of heat, cold, electrical, and the combined
effect of sharp hurting. If one stuck a fork in his arm, he would
experience pain. When one uses PAIN in connection with clearing one means
awareness of heat, cold, electrical or hurting stemming from the reactive
mind. A, cording to experiments done at Harvard, if one were to make a grid
with heated tubes going vertical and chilled tubes going horizontal and
were to place a small current of electricity through the lot, the device,
touched to a body, would produce the feeling of PAIN. It need not be
composed of anything very hot or cold or of any high voltage to produce a
very intense feeling of pain. Therefore what we call PAIN is itself, heat,
cold and electrical. If a pc experiences one or more of these from his
reactive mind, we say he is experiencing PAIN.
"Electrical" is the bridge between sensation and PAIN and is difficult
to classify as either PAIN or sensation when it exists alone. Symbol PN.
SENSATION = All other uncomfortable perceptions stemming from the
reactive mind are called SENSATION. These are basically "pressure,"
"motion," "dizziness," "sexual sensation," and "emotion and misemotion."
There are others, definite in themselves but definable in these five
general categories. If one took the fork in the pain definition above and
pressed it against the arm, that would be "pressure." "Motion" is just
that, a feeling of being in motion when one is not. "Motion" includes the
"winds of space," a feeling of being blown upon, especially from in front
of the face. "Dizziness" is a feeling of disorientation and includes a
spinniness, as well as an out-of-balance feeling. "Sexual sensation" means
any feeling, pleasant or unpleasant, commonly experienced during sexual
restimulation or action. "Emotion and misemotion" include all levels of the
complete Tone Scale except "pain"; emotion and misemotion are closely
allied to "motion," being only a finer particle action. A bank solidity is
a form of "pressure," and when the sensation of increasing solidity of
masses in the mind occurs, we say "the bank is beefing up." All these are
classified as SENSATION. Symbol SEN.
TERMINAL = An item or identity the pc has actually been sometime in the
past (or present) is called a TERMINAL. It is "the pc's own valence" at
that time. In the Goals Problem Mass (the black masses of the reactive
mind) those identities which, when contacted, produce pain, tell us at once
that they are TERMINALS. The person could feel
pain only as himself (thetan plus body) and therefore identities he has
been produce pain when their mental residues (black masses) are recontacted
in processing. Symbol TERM.
OPPOSITION TERMINAL = An item or identity the pc has actually opposed
(fought, been an enemy of) sometime in the past (or present) is called an
OPPOSITION TERMINAL. As the person identified himself as not it he could
experience from it only sensation. An OPPOSITION TERMINAL, when its mental
residues (black masses) are recontacted in processing, produces only
sensation, never pain. Symbol OPPTERM.
COMBINED TERMINAL = An item or identity the pc has both been and
opposed produces therefore both pain and sensation when it is "late on the
track," which is to say, after the fact of many terminals and opposition
terminals. The combination terminal is the closure between terminal and
opposition terminal lines which possesses attributes of both and the
clarity of neither. It signifies a period toward the end of a game. It is
found most commonly when the pc's case is only shallowly entered. They
exist on all cases but are fewer than terminals and opposition terminals.
Symbol COTERM.
ITEM = Any terminal, opposition terminal, combination terminal,
significance or idea (but not a doingness, which is called "a level")
appearing on a list derived from the pc. Symbol It.
RELIABLE ITEM = Any item that rock slams well on being found and at
session end and which was the last item still in after assessing the list.
Can be a terminal, an opposition terminal, a combination terminal or a
significance, provided only that it was the item found on a list and rock
slammed. Symbol RI.
ROCK SLAM = The crazy, irregular, left-right slashing motion of the
needle on the E-Meter dial. R/Ses repeat left and right slashes unevenly
and savagely, faster than the eye easily follows. The needle is frantic.
The width of an R/S depends largely on sensitivity setting. It goes from
one-fourth inch to whole dial. But it slams back and forth.
A rock slam is the response of an E-Meter to the conflict between
terminals and opposition terminals. It indicates a fight, an effort to
individuate, an extreme games condition which in the absence of auditing
would seek unsuccessfully to separate while attacking. A rock slam means a
hidden evil intention on the subject or question under auditing or
discussion.
As the pc's attention is guided to the items involved the games
condition activates and is expressed on the meter as a ragged, frantic
response. The wider the response the more recognizable (to the pc) is the
reality of the games condition and the violence of the conflict.
The rock slam channel is that hypothetical course between a series of
pairs consisting of terminals and opposition terminals.
If the conflict is too great for the pc's reality no rock slam results.
Later in auditing as the pc's confronting rises, items which did not react
earlier in auditing now begin to be real and so express themselves on a
meter as a rock slam. The pc with the lowest reality level is the hardest
to attain a rock slam on, but in contradiction a pc who has the least
control over himself in certain zones of life has the largest rock slams.
The rock slam vanishes under Suppression and activates on Invalidate or
Withhold or on other Prehav Levels.
This is the most difficult needle response to find or attain or
preserve. And it is the most valuable in clearing.
All rock slams result from a pair of items in opposition, one of which
is a terminal, the other being an opposition terminal.
It can exist in present time where the pc is the terminal and what the
pc is faced with is the opposition terminal. Symbol R/S.
INSTANT ROCK SLAM = That rock slam which begins at the end of the major
thought of any item. Symbol IRS. (Valid R/Ses are not always instant reads.
An R/S can read prior or latently.)
DIRTY NEEDLE = An erratic agitation of the needle which is ragged, jerky,
ticking, not sweeping, and tends to be persistent. /t is not limited in
size. Symbol DN.
DIRTY READ = An instant agitation of the needle in response to a major
thought. It is ragged, jerky, ticking, not sweeping, and is not limited in
size. Unlike the dirty needle, it does not persist. Symbol DR.
TESTING
The method of testing for the character of an item whether term,
oppterm or coterm is extremely simple.
If the item, when said to the pc in any way, turns on PAIN in the pc's
body it is a TERMINAL.
If the item, when said to the pc in any way, turns on SENSATION around
or in the pc's body it is an OPPOSITION TERMINAL.
If the item, when said to the pc in any way, turns on both PAIN and
SENSATION in or around the pets body it is a COMBINATION TERMINAL.
WAYS OF ASKING
The rule is, "Give the terminal cause, the opposition terminal effect
in any listing, working or use."
The simplest form is, of course, just chanting the item at the pc a few
times. This is not always workable.
The simplest but not always workable form is:
For a terminal-"Would a ________ commit overts."
For an opposition terminal-"Consider committing overts against
_________."
Using PH Level.
Instead of "Committing Overts" the Prehav Level by which the reliable
item was found is normally used:
For a terminal-"Would a _____ (item) _____ (PH Level)" or
"Consider a _____ (item) _____ ing (PH Level)."
For an opposition terminal-"Consider _____ ing (PH Level) a _____(item)
."
USING TD BUTTONS
The above sentences may also be used, or their rough approximation,
with a Tiger Drill or Prepcheck button, and if a rock slam is present, it
may develop.
__________
No matter what method is being used in saying the item being tested to
find out if it is a terminal, opposition terminal or combination terminal,
the rules of sensation and pain apply. Sensation means oppterm. Pain means
terminal.
__________
It is important to know if an item is a term, oppterm or coterm, as its
character as one of the three determines the listing question.
The same rule for testing applies in listing. If it is a terminal, it
(Prehav Levels). If it is an opposition terminal it is (Prehav Leveled).
Example: For a terminal, A Waterbuck, Prehav Level Snort. Proper
listing question: "Who or what would a waterbuck snort at?"
Example: For an oppterm, A Tiger, Prehav Level Snort. "Who or what would
snort at a tiger?"
Of course the reverse can be listed but is rarely necessary except to
get a longer list when the pc stalls.
THE LINE PLOT
A line plot must be made up for any pc for his 3GAXX or the Listing the
Goal steps of Routine 3-21 (steps 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of 21 steps).
This consists of a heavy blue 13" (foolscap or legal) sheet of paper,
kept in the pc's folder and kept up to date every time a reliable item (or
even last item in) is found.
On this line plot one column, the left-hand one, is reserved for
oppterms. The right-hand column is reserved for terms and lines indicate
whenever terms or oppterms are derived from each other.
A reliable item is designated as such on this line plot with the symbol
RI. Nonreliable items are not designated.
The date each line plot item was found is added after the item so it
can be found again in the Auditor's Reports without a scramble.
The full behaviour and character of any item found is written into the
Auditor's Report of that session in which it was found. The width of the
instant rock slam in inches, whether the slam turned on every time the item
was read, what wording turned it on, and whether it would still R/S by
session end are all made part of the Auditor's Report.
__________
About 20% or 25% of the cases that appear for clearing can have
reliable items found on them at once by exploring the words "Scientology,"
"A Scientology Organization," "An auditor," "Me (the auditor)," "Ron," or
the head of the local Scientology organization by name. These are
considered to be oppterms by any pc whose realization of his goal would be
interfered with, he or she feels, by Scientology. It does not matter what
wording (see above) turns on the R/S so long as it can be consistently
turned on for a bit. If it is at first only a dirty read, it is Tiger
Drilled to try to make it rock slam. Only in this peculiar instance is the
person called a rock slammer or is considered a security risk. Everyone
alive R/Ses on something. In any event, if items such as those in this
paragraph turn on a rock slam, they are put on the line plot as reliable
items and used in handling the case.
The above material is in actual fact a partial anatomy of the Goals
Problems Mass, its identification in auditing and the behaviour of an E-
Meter towards it.
As it has never before been viewed by any practice, mental science or
religion, it has to have special terminology.
The terminology has been stably in use for quite some time in
Scientology. I have made the definitions more precise in this HCO Bulletin.
Anyone working in clearing should have this HCO Bulletin data at his
instant call without referral to the HCO Bulletin.
With very few additions, this is the track one walks in clearing and
going Clear.
Know it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gl.rd.mdf
Copyright � 1962, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 DECEMBER AD12R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Revised to correct the definition of Dirty Needle)
URGENT
IMPORTANT
ROUTINES 2-12 & 2-10
CASE ERRORS
POINTS OF GREATEST IMPORTANCE
The errors in doing Routine 2-10 and Routine 2-12 are divided into two
broad divisions:
(a) Those of auditing itself;
(b) Those deriving from errors in doing the exact skills of
Routines 2-10 and 2-12.
AUDITING ERRORS
This bulletin touches only briefly on the errors of (a) auditing
errors. These consist of sloppy form, bad TRs, inability to read a meter,
Auditor Code breaks, Q and A-ing, missing missed W/Hs, doing bad mid ruds
or Tiger Drilling and using auditing form to hold up results.
One remedies bad auditing (as different from bad 2-10 or 2-12) by
following this prescription:
The poorer the auditor, the more a supervisor or instructor takes away
from him the tools of auditing. In short, if an auditor makes bad auditing
errors, one simplifies the auditing to prevent the errors. Don't let him or
her do 2-12. Make such an auditor use only 2-10. Then, as the auditor's
skill in basic auditing improves, the more he or she can be trusted with 2-
12.
Do NOT let an auditor who can't do any kind of a job of basic auditing
do 2-12. Let such an auditor do only 2-10. And then as that auditor's case
improves on 2-10 or 2-12, and as training drills are passed, let the
auditor graduate up to 2-12.
Remember this: 2-12 works all by itself with no auditing niceties. And
it can be prevented from working (but only to some degree) by bad auditing
form or intention.
Strip off Model Session, mid ruds, Tiger Drilling, and two-way comm,
demand it be run muzzled, muzzled, muzzled, use the meter only to find rock
slams, and modern Routine 2 works like a dream, a dream, a dream even for
an auditor whose auditing skill is terrible.
Let a Q and A artist clean cleans on a meter, muck up the mid ruds, yap
at the pc, and Routine 2 won't work because it never gets done.
So the training stress and the use stress of Routine 2 is just on
Routine 2, its rules and how it's done, and when the auditor has case gains
and wins, auditing form is then entered upon.
The backwards way is to insist on a good hard study of form before training
on Routine 2. Always hammer Routine 2 home first and get it done, not
fooled with by the Mixed-up Kid from Mid Rud Gulch.
Your main trouble will come from not teaching Routine 2 hard just as
itself before entering upon the niceties of auditing. You have to show the
wild man it's a house before you teach him to serve French Pastry a la
Partie.
Of course nothing in this HCO Bulletin should be used to degrade the
value of good auditing form.
Good metering, a smooth command of the TRs, a grip on the basics and a
fine knowledge of fundamentals are vital in an auditor.
You can't get all there is to get out of Routine 2-12 with rough
auditing.
Auditing skill is not just something to acquire. It's the only thing
that gets real auditing done. And good auditors are scarce and I appreciate
them. I've had my share of rough auditing and I know the diamonds and gold
of a smooth, flawless auditor.
But Routine 2, at the time of this writing, and for always in some area
of the world as we expand, will be handled with rough auditor skill.
Therefore, for the purposes of this HCO Bulletin, we will consider the
auditing skill to be rough and show what Routines 2-10 and 2-12 can do in
unpolished hands.
And never fear, when their cases are better and the training can be
stepped up, they'll become polished, never fear. And appreciate being so.
It's my brag I can get a pc out of anything with just auditing skill. That
makes me pretty brave as an auditor. But this "Bring on your lions"
attitude is born out of auditing skills, taught, not "native." I use the
same pattern and patter as you do if you audit textbook. But I don't clean
cleans often or miss reads ever and I don't Q and A. You can audit just as
well as I can with practice and study. Why do I know this? Well, auditing
is not my main forte, not even close to my appointments and goals.
We're probably all rock slammers somewhere on List One and this is Man
pulling himself out of the mud indeed.
So don't run down pure auditing skill. It's more precious than anything
in this universe.
But you can acquire it as you do Routine 2 and after.
Meanwhile don't overrate the power of Routine 2 to work with rough
auditing so long as the Routine 2 is done right.
THE ERRORS OF ROUTINE 2
Routine 2 (by which is meant 2-10 & 2-12) has its own rules and these
must be learned first and learned well.
Routine 2 today is a powerful process. And if it can straighten up a pc
so fast, it can also cave him in fast. However such cave-ins, while
dramatic, are very easy to remedy even though they must be remedied with
accuracy. (The remedies are all contained in this HCO Bulletin.)
Remember, in doing Routine 2, the primary pc upset is from badly done
Routine 2, not badly done auditing. To repair a car don't look for paint
scratches when somebody has removed the engine. Auditing form is paint
scratches. The removed engine is flubbed Routine 2.
Routine 2 must be taught hard, not just as a version of auditing but as
itself. It is its own technical package and it doesn't even infringe on the
basics of auditing.
AUDITOR RESPONSIBILITY
Routine 2 has several hills to climb. One of them is auditor
responsibility. This process has the peculiarity of handing all
responsibility for case gain or worsening to the auditor.
You will hear people who haven't a clue on Routine 2 crying about bad
pcs, bad D of P-ing, bad Ron and blaming everyone but themselves.
Investigate and you'll find only an auditor flub on Routine 2.
All Routine 2 auditor flubs consist of:
(a) Not knowing Routine 2.
(b) Not doing Routine 2.
There are no other Routine 2 auditor flubs.
In Routine 2 all gain or lack of gain is assignable directly and only
to the auditor.
Frightening isn't it?
But encouraging too. For it puts the auditor at cause, wholly and
completely, over the pc's case. You might have known that would happen with
the first all-case fast gain process.
DURATION OF PROCESS
Routine 2 is here to stay. You've been used to the changing face of
processing.
That discouraged learning any process very well and setting up to get
it done by one and all. Well, Routine 2 is here to stay. It isn't going to
change. You can invest a great amount of time and effort on learning it.
It's here to stay because where it doesn't get results, the auditor
didn't know it or didn't do it, and we can always remedy that.
It only produces mediocre or worsening results when it either isn't
known or isn't done.
Further, it is quite easy to do.
And it produces fast, stable results. very startling to even raw meat.
There is more miracle in 50 hours of well done Routine 2 than in the entire
history of the Church .
Further it has to be done on every case before a goal can easily or
reliably be found, or even if found, before it can be run.
So there it is. Learn it.
NO AUDITING
The first and greatest error of Routine 2 is no auditing.
Yes, the auditor may be sitting there like a one-man band, busy as free
beer at the boiler works and yet not be auditing Routine 2.
Example: Eat up two-thirds of every session with needless beginning, middle
and end rudiments.
Example: Spend two hours Prepchecking the mid ruds and then find the
reason the needle is dirty is an incomplete list.
Example: Spend three sessions full of general O/W trying to calm an ARC
breaky pc when in actual fact the auditor has been opposing an item off an
incomplete list.
It's not just audit the pc in front of you. That's vital enough. But
audit the pc in front of you with correct Routine 2.
Auditors have been known to spend hours, days, running old processes to
get the pc "up to running 2-12" when five minutes of 2-12 would have had
the pc sailing.
NO AUDITING means "While seeming to deliver auditing, actually get
nothing done." It's the greatest crime in Routine 2 or Routine 3. NO
AUDITING can be reduced to the finest art. Doing a wrong list, re-doing a
dead horse, these aren't no auditing. Auditing may have been wasted or may
be slow, but it's still auditing. No, NO AUDITING means going through
endless, useless motions, perhaps in top form, perhaps perfectly, none of
which are calculated to advance the pc's case one inch. Doing havingness
every half page, endlessly Tiger Drilling, doing mid ruds just because it's
"good form," all these and a thousand more add up to NO AUDITING. Absolute
essentials, bare bone, and bounteous correct 2- 12 are AUDITING.
Mid ruds, Tiger Drilling are necessary to good auditing but using them
an inch beyond necessity is NO AUDITING.
FAILURE TO SAVE RECORDS
Almost the only way to completely bar the door on the pc is to lose his
case folder or fail to put all lists and reports in it.
Every sheet of every list must have on it the pc's name, date of the
list and the question from which the list comes.
This is the biggest MUST in Routine 2: Preserve the records and make
them identifiable and usable.
FAILING TO FIND R/SES ON LIST ONE
Failing to find and utilize an R/S on List One is the most common (but
not the most destructive to the pc's health) error in Routine 2.
Example: Auditor has three dead horses. Abandons case. Another auditor
assesses List One, Tiger Drills the R/Ses out, represents a tick. Gets
another dead horse. Abandons case. Pc now known as a "tough pc." A third
auditor gets cunning, looks over the original assessment, sees "auditor"
R/Sed once long ago. It doesn't now, having been Tiger Drilled to death.
Opposes it. Gets a beautiful R/Sing list. Case starts to fly.
This error has been done over, and over and over and is the source of
all dead horses.
RULE: Oppose every R/S found on List One or IA or a "PT consists of"
list. Oppose them even when they only R/Sed on Tiger Drill buttons. Take
the R/Sing item most intimate to the actual session as the first one to
use. If in further doubt take the R/Sing item closest to the session the pc
is interested in.
List One, 1A or "PT consists of" lists do not have to be RIs to be opposed.
They are locks on RIs. They only need to briefly R/S, or to have been seen
to R/S at some time, to be opposed. If they R/Sed at any time they must be
opposed according to whether they are terms or oppterms.
I have seen a case fail to give more than dead horses until somebody
recalled that on a Sec Check test a year before the case had R/Sed on
"Scientology Orgs" (now not even a tick). When that was opposed, a dial
wide R/S turned on for 55 consecutive pages of items, a high record.
One remedy is to Tiger Drill "On List One ," but it isn't infallible.
REPRESENTING AN R/Sing ITEM
One of the three most destructive actions to the pc is representing an
R/Sing item. (The other two are opposing an R/Sing item taken from an
incomplete list, both included below.)
Representing an R/Sing item puts a terrible strain on the pc's
attention. The list may even R/S, probably will. But the opposing item, now
hidden, wreaks havoc on the pc all the time its companion is being listed
on a represent list. A real calm pc can turn into a screamer if an R/Sing
item is listed with a represent list, whether it has been opposed or not.
(Note: This is contrary to a 3GAXX action which could be done only
because a detested person wasn't a vital oppterm. It should not be done
even in 3GAXX.)
RULE: Only do opposition lists on R/Sing items. Never represent them.
OPPOSE RIs
Always oppose an RI and continue to oppose RIs until you get a
satisfactory package. Never leave a BYPASSED item.
To do so is destructive to the preclear. This is not the greatest
source of destructiveness and not every RI bypassed will ruin the preclear.
But once out of three times the pc will be upset.
Example: "Scientology" R/Ses. A reliable item "a slavemaster" is found
on the opposition list. It is not then itself opposed. Pc is upset by
presence of a hidden item that opposes "a slavemaster." Pc stays upset
until "a slavemaster" is opposed and its RI companion item "a freedom
fighter" is found. "Slavery" shows up on the "Opp Scientology" list as the
thing that actually fronted up to "Scientology" when the whole thing was
packaged.
RULE: When a First List R/Sing item is opposed and an RI is found, then
Routine 2 steps are incomplete until the found RI is itself opposed.
It goes represent-oppose-oppose or Oppose, Oppose.
It will be seen that First List R/Sing items are usually locks into PT
on actual RIs. It will also be seen that the rock slams on the First List,
the first opposing RI and the RI that opposes that all match. They have the
same width and speed and pattern. They seldom all R/S at the same time but
in sequence of when first found.
RULE: All items found must be completely packaged.
RULE: All R/Ses in a package must match in character and vanish when
fully packaged.
Leaving a bypassed item is also possible because of incomplete lists. (See
below.)
INCOMPLETE LISTS
If, after nulling, you have several rock slamming items remaining, your
list is always incomplete.
Bonus packages vanish as soon as spotted. They occur once in a while.
They can be ignored in this rule:
RULE: If you find more than one R/S in nulling a list that list is
incomplete and must be completed.
Example: "Preclear (pn)" once R/Sed so it is opposed. The "Who or what
would a preclear oppose" list is listed and a dozen R/Ses were seen on
listing (OK so far). The list tested without reaction on the question. The
auditor starts to null the list. Some of the items that R/Sed while being
listed, R/S now on nulling. List is nulled down to 3 (!) R/Sing items.
Auditor chooses one. It R/Ses nicely. This is "a control device (sen)."
Auditor now lists "Who or what would oppose a control device?" List R/Ses
well. However, masses tend to close in on pc. Havingness drops. Pc possibly
ARC breaky. Auditor continues on listing. And on. And on. Finally gets to
nulling. Very hard job. Pc cutting up. Auditor tries to pull missed
withholds. After much blood auditor finds four R/Sing items left on list,
chooses "a wild man" and tries to package. Pc glum. Very little cognition.
TWO items have been bypassed. How? Auditing supervisor sees that several
items on the "Who or what would a pc oppose" list R/Sed on nulling. Assumes
rightly list was incomplete. Directs it to be completed. Pc smiles brightly
and with a suddenly clean needle lists 80 more items (several of which R/S
on listing). Masses fall away from pc again. No ARC breaks. This time only
one item R/Sed on nulling. "A controller (sen)." (Only new list is nulled
of course. You never re-null in 2-12.) R/S has mysteriously (and correctly)
vanished off every other R/Sing item on that list. The list "Who or what
would oppose a control device?" is wholly scrubbed, being wrong. The
auditor now lists "Who or what would oppose a controller?" The pc happily
lists 2Q0 items (many R/Sing). The needle goes clean. The auditor starts
nulling. Finds he has two items on the first three pages that R/S. Has
learned his lesson and, leaving off nulling for the moment, gets pc to add
50 items. Auditor goes on nulling. Nulls down to one R/Sing item, "an
insane idiot." The R/S on "a preclear," "a controller" and "an insane
idiot" all matched when seen each in turn (but "a preclear" doesn't R/S any
more). Pc cogniting like mad. Very happy. Masses all moved off and
havingness up.
RULE: If in nulling more than one R/S is seen on list, that list is
incomplete and must be completed.
There are no exceptions to this rule. Bonus packages blow off on a
completed list.
Also, to clarify, keep in mind this rule:
RULE: If a list does not R/S now and then or at least once when being
listed, it will become a dead horse.
That some list items R/Sed when the pc said them during listing is
natural.
If, with Suppress clean, more than one of them R/Ses during nulling,
that list is incomplete.
Also, in passing, don't finish nulling a list before adding to it as a
general practice. Add to it when the pc's needle is dirty or when you see
more than one R/S on it during nulling. The pc ARC breaks if you keep
completing the nulling of the existing list and then adding.
WRONG WAY OPPOSE
Pcs are not always right when telling you it's a terminal (pn) or
oppterm (sen). They even sometimes lie to try to save their face (to keep
from looking bad in an auditor's eyes or the world, or to seem even more
villainous than they are).
The only real test of a right way oppose is whether or not the list
lists easily with IMPROVED SKIN TONE in the pc and improved cheerfulness,
and if it produces one R/Sing item that packages later.
If you just can't tell which way to oppose, oppose both ways and then
decide on pc's appearance which way was right and continue it.
Wrong way opposition is not usual. Usually the pc tells the truth and
all is well. But when a list is listed wrong way to on opposition it's
long, horrible and deadly.
The pc goes faintly grey, green yellow or blackish, looks worse, and
the list gets endless. A wrong way list will R/S. So it's only pc
appearance that tells the story. Routine 2 is beneficial. Pcs that are
listed with right way opposition look brighter, younger, with a more
translucent skin tone. You won't make a mistake if you can tell the
difference between a young boy and an old man, it's that distinct.
(Remember, a pc will also look worse as above if you took an item from an
incomplete list or committed any of the other R2 errors in this HCO
Bulletin.)
LISTS THAT WON'T COMPLETE
The only reasons a list will not complete are:
(a) Wrong Source
(b) Wrong Way To Oppose.
In either case there is something wrong with the source of the list.
That a list is listing R/Ses is no guarantee of rightness of source. A
wrong way to list will R/S. Some lists taken from a wrong source cycle R/S,
DR, clean needle, R/S, DR, clean needle.
Wrong sources are:
1. A First List item is opposed that didn't ever R/S.
2. An "RI" grabbed off an incomplete list that must be completed,
3. An item that was a terminal being opposed as though it were an
oppterm and vice versa,
4. On a represent list, the item being represented actually was an
R/Sing item,
5. On a represent list the item being represented was badly chosen
and of no interest to the pc.
There are no other wrong sources and thus no other R2 way to get a list
that won't complete. But when you do get a list that won't complete, be
very careful to look over the above 5 reasons and pick out the right one.
You may have to complete an earlier list first and scrub the one you're on.
Incompleting lists are usually abandoned without further patch-up.
How long is an incomplete list? How long is a piece of string?
LONG LONG LISTS
Don't ever be afraid to have a long list, only be afraid of short ones.
But when a list is running up toward thousands, something is wrong.
Endless lists stem basically from wrong source as above or from the
auditor's failure to understand what indicates a complete list.
If, on close study of the case folder and pc, Routine 2 errors seem to
be absent- the source is right and not something taken from another list
itself incomplete, if the oppose is right way to, then look for the
following:
(a) Pc is not answering auditing question or
(b) Pc has decided something was his item and is representing it or
is otherwise operating on a decision.
The remedies are to get Decide in well and to make sure, without
upsetting him, that the pc is answering the auditing question.
And if that is all OK, then it's just a long list, so complete it.
RULE: A list is complete when it can be nulled and when it produces
just one RI that R/Ses on Tiger Drilling and stays in.
A list can be nulled only when a needle is clean (except in 2-10).
The definition of a CLEAN NEEDLE is one which flows, producing no
pattern or erratic motions of the smallest kind with the auditor sitting
looking at it and doing nothing. A CLEAN NEEDLE is not just something that
doesn't react to a particular question. It's a lovely slow flow, usually a
rise, most beautifully expressed on a Mark V at 64 sensitivity.
A list has to be listed until this needle flow is observed (with no mid
ruds put in). But ruds or no ruds, a CLEAN NEEDLE always appears when a
list is complete.
A DIRTY NEEDLE is an erratic agitation of the needle which is ragged,
jerky, ticking, not sweeping, and tends to be persistent. It is not limited
in size.
There are the auditing methods of converting a dirty needle to a clean
needle, both as defined above. These are all the skills of auditing used
with big mid rud buttons.
Now entirely and distinctly separate from auditing skills for cleaning
a needle, there are the Routine 2 methods for converting a dirty needle to
a clean needle.
Usually both auditing and Routine 2 methods are used to clean a needle
so that one can null, the former briefly, the latter abundantly.
However, do not overlook the demonstrable fact that Routine 2 methods
for cleaning a needle are very beneficial and lasting in results, whereas
purely auditing methods (like mid ruds) have value only for the moment and,
even though auditing methods are desirable in this operation, when the
Routine 2 is in error, the clean needle is really impossible to achieve
longer than seconds with auditing methods.
The obvious solution to cleaning a needle is to first have Routine 2 as
perfect as possible (the errors outlined in this HCO Bulletin uncommitted
or being rapidly corrected) and then use auditing methods.
Try it in reverse (auditing methods first and then using corrections of
Routine 2) and you will not only fail to get a needle clean longer than
seconds, you may also waste the better part of an intensive trying to do
it.
So spend hours straightening up Routine 2 errors and doing it right and
brief minutes with auditing methods when necessary.
And don't revile a pc for having a dirty needle. It's the auditor who
dirties it up with incorrect or inaccurate Routine 2, not the pc,
Now a clean needle is vital in order to null a list. Don't ever try to
null a list with the needle dirty. If the Routine 2 is right, the needle
will clean up with two minutes' work of big mid ruds. If Routine 2 errors
(wrong list source, list incomplete, wrong way oppose, etc. as per this HCO
Bulletin) exist and Routine 2 is being done wrong, then two hours' worth of
big mid ruds will not clean a dirty needle.
Any of the Routine 2 errors taken up in this HCO Bulletin will create a
dirty needle and keep it dirty and leave the auditor sweating over mid ruds
and the pc going mad trying to answer the questions. Yes, the mid ruds are
out. But why? Because one or more serious Routine 2 errors as described in
this HCO Bulletin are present.
So see the light. If you sweat on mid ruds as an auditor, curse them as
a pc or see a co-auditor dripping exasperation over mid ruds and the needle
won't stay clean, look at the Routine 2, not the difficulty with mid ruds.
Look for the errors here described. Check them off on the case, one by one,
and don't even be satisfied that it's only "no auditing." Check all the
errors off, section by section. You'll be startled.
So in general, difficult mid ruds and dirty needle indicate wrong
Routine 2, not bad auditing. Somebody has flubbed the Routine 2 before the
auditing was flubbed. Once the Routine 2 is in error, auditing becomes
impossible.
This gives no excuse for bad metering, cleaning cleans, trying to look
like an auditor but ignoring results. Auditing errors do exist. And can be
serious, but a pc running on right Routine 2 would forgive the Pope for
having a forked tail. You almost can't muddy up a pc running on right
Routine 2.
Here's a trick. Don't try to null a list until you've seen a clean
flowing needle for a lot of items, maybe 50. Then get in fast mid ruds on
the list and do it without cleaning any cleans. Then start nulling. If the
needle dirties up after 30-40 items, skip mid ruds, just show the pc the
page and have him spot any big thoughts he had on it. Then immediately get
back to nulling. If the needle is dirty still, resume listing until it's
clean. Just do those actions and (given error-free Routine 2 as per this
HCO Bulletin) you'll have a smooth, smooth happy time of it in nulling.
Do anything you don't have to do in auditing Routine 2 and you're in
trouble in the auditing department. Bang out almost total Routine 2 and
you're in clover. Give 1/10th of the session over to goals, mid ruds and
other auditing actions and 9/10ths of the session to pure Routine 2 actions
and you'll really win. And that 1/10th includes any mid ruds on the list as
well. Give half the session to auditing and half to Routine 2 and you'll be
in continuous trouble.
The righter the Routine 2, the less auditing you'll have to do.
So how long is a list? Can you null it with a needle that requires only
a pc inspection of a page to keep it clean? Are all but one of the R/Ses
that happened in auditing dead when you nulled? Are your pages long streams
of Xs? Did you have to use Suppress only once per page (fast check) to keep
it clean?
Wells that's a complete list. If it gave you an RI. Just one.
So how long is a list?
But if all the above is true and a pc's lists are still very long,
another thing can be wrong.
That wrongness usually is the pc's confronting ability being driven down by
auditor unconfrontability. (But also can be caused by a wrong RI or other
errors gone before it as covered in this HCO Bulletin.)
The auditor Qs and As, yap, yaps, nags the pc, blames, gets in endless
mid ruds, cleans cleans, misses reads or does something else.
The length of an auditor's pc's lists is to some degree proportional to
the rough auditing or no auditing done by the auditor. (And also by a
failure to use mid ruds and TD in the right places when necessary.)
We have known since '55 that rough auditing reduces havingness. Here's
why: Rough auditing lowers the pc's ability to confront in the session. The
pc's havingness is proportional to his ability to confront in the session.
If a pc's havingness by can squeeze test is lower at session end than at
beginning on Routine 2, then there's something wrong with the auditing or
with the way Routine 2 is being applied (one of the above Routine 2 errors
is being made).
The remedy for the bad auditing is to make the auditor only acknowledge
anything and everything the pc says or put it on the list. Tear out all
rudiments, Tiger Drills, two-way comm, and forbid any chance to comment or
act on an origin by the pc, and get only Routine 2 done.
The remedy for Routine 2 errors (and the errors themselves) are given
above in this HCO Bulletin.
CONCLUSION
Routine 2 does not have an endless parade of DO-NOTS. They are
basically just those above.
Simple, really.
And I've not seen one session on Routine 2 that was going really wrong,
go wrong on auditing errors alone. Routine 2 sessions go wrong on bad
Routine 2. The auditing form and meter errors start to pile up after
Routine 2 has been balled up. One or more of the above Routine 2 errors has
been done and overlooked.
The reason why Routine 2 errors are more deadly than purely auditing
errors is that Routine 2 is handling the pc by batches of lifetimes. All
the stress and gore and agony of generations exist on the lists of any one
package. An auditing error can be gross and get by unless it is sitting on
a Routine 2 error. Then the tiniest auditing flub can produce a reaction
like an earthquake. The charge is all coming from Routine 2 mishandling and
is evident on the surface only by the auditing error.
CASE REMEDY
Routine 2 case patch-up is elementary, done with a knowledge of the
above errors. Just find out which one of the above sections is being
violated. And get it done. The error will only be one of the above to cause
case non-progress or worsening.
The sections are given in order of importance.
I will shortly work up a series of actual case history case repairs. So
save the records and you save all.
SUMMARY
Routine 2-10 and 2-12 are their own technology and must be learned as
such.
Routine 2 errors are more shaking to a case than errors in form and meter
(except where the auditor can't even see a rock slam!) and where a case is
not winning on
Routine 2 auditing it is the Routine 2 that must be reviewed-and fast.
The elements to be reviewed are all listed above by sections in order of
importance. Of course many other smaller fantastic errors can be done and
will be invented but they will be junior in value to those listed above and
will be reported when found.
Routine 2 will be with us a long, long time and it is worth learning
well. It takes the toughest case apart and is the only process that can
start the actual clearing of 80% or more of all cases.
I have done or reviewed thousands of hours of auditing in forming and
organizing and testing Routine 2.
It is the most gratifying (and sometimes hair-raising) auditing I have
ever done or viewed. You can't oversell Routine 2. You just can't. For it
is the first gateway to light, life and liberty for all Mankind at last.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr.rd.dr
Copyright � 1962, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JUNE AD13R
REVISED 3 OCTOBER 1977
Central Orgs
Franchise
(Revision in this type style page 25,
paragraph .)
(Reissued 21 March 1978 to correct a typo in paragraph 7, page 29.)
THE TIME TRACK
AND
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
BULLETIN 2
HANDLING THE TIME TRACK
Although finding and curtailing the development of the time track at
genus is not improbable, the ability of the preclear to attain it early on
is questionable without reducing the charge on the existing track.
Therefore, any system which reduces the charged condition of the time track
without reducing but increasing the awareness and decisionability of the
preclear is valid processing. Any system which seeks to handle the charge
but reduces the preclear's awareness and decisionability is not valid
processing but is degrading.
According to early axioms, the single source of aberration is time.
Therefore any system which further confuses or overwhelms the preclear's
sense of time will not be beneficial.
Thus the first task of the student of engram running is to master the
handling of time on the preclear's time track. It must be handled without
question, uncertainty or confusion.
Failing to handle the time in the pc's time track with confidence,
certainty and without error will result in grouping or denying the time
track to the pc.
The prime source of ARC break in engram running sessions is bypassing
charge by time mishandling by the auditor. As a subhead under this, taking
and trying to run incidents which are not basic on a chain constitute an
error in time and react on the pc like bypassed RIs or GPMs.
An ARC break-less session requires gentle accurate time scouting, the
selection of the earliest timed incident available and the accurate time
handling of the incident as it is run.
There are only a few reasons why some cannot run engrams on pcs. These
are:
1. Q and A with the pain and unconsciousness of incidents;
2. Failing to handle the time track of the pc for the pc;
3. Failure to understand and handle time.
2 and 3 are much the same. However, there are three ways to move a time
track about:
(a) By Significance (the moment something was considered);
(b) By Location (the moment the pc was located somewhere);
(c) By Time alone (the date or years before an event or years ago).
You will see all three have time in common. "The moment when you
thought______" "The moment you were on the cliff " "Two years before you
put your foot on the bottom step of the scaffold" are all dependent on
time. Each designates an instant on the time track of which there can be no
mistake by either auditor or pc.
The whole handling of the time track can be done by any one of these
three methods, Significance, Location, Time.
Therefore all projectionist work is done by the Time of Significance,
the Time of Location or Time alone.
The track responds. Those auditors who have trouble cannot grasp the
totality and accuracy and speed of that response. The idiotic and wonderful
precision of the time track defeats the sloppy and careless. They wonder if
it went. They question the pc's being there. They fumble about until they
destroy their command over the time track.
"Go to 47,983,678,283,736 years 2 months, 4 days I hour and six minutes
ago." Well, a clear statement of it, unfumbled, will cause just that to
happen. The tiniest quiver of doubt, a fumble over the millions and nothing
happens.
Fumbled dating gets no dates. One must date boldly with no throat
catches or hesitations. "More than 40,000? Less than 40,000?" Get it the
first read. Don't go on peering myopically at the meter asking the same
question the rest of the session. Accurate, bold, rapid. Those are the
watchwords of dating and time track handling.
In moving a time track about, move only the track. Don't mix it and
also move the pc. You can say "Move to ." You don't have to say (but you
can) "The somatic strip will move to ." But never say "You will move to ."
And this also applies to present time. The pc won't come to present time.
He's here. But the time track will move to the date of present time unless
the pc is really stuck. In getting a pc to present time (unimportant in
modern engram running) say "Move to (date month and year of PT)."
In scouting you always use To. "Move To ." In running an engram or
whatever, you always use THROUGH. "Move through the incident ."
If an auditor hasn't a ruddy clue about the time track and its
composition, he or she won't ever be able to run engrams. So, obviously,
the first thing to teach and have passed in engram running is time track
composition. When the auditor learns that, he or she will be able to run
engrams. If the auditor does not know the subject of the time track well,
then he or she can't be taught to run engrams, for no rote commands that
cover all cases can exist. You couldn't teach the handling of a motion
picture projector by rote commands if the operator had never imagined the
existence of film. An auditor sitting there thinking the pc is doing this
or that and being in a general fuddle about it will soon have film all over
the floor and wrapped about his ears. His plea for a rote command will just
tangle up more film so long as he doesn't know it is film and that he, not
the preclear, is handling it.
If an auditor can learn this, he will then be able to learn to run
those small parts of the time track called engrams. If an auditor can't run
a pc through some pleasant time track flawlessly, he or she sure can't run
a pc through the living lightning parts of that track called engrams.
An auditor who cannot handle the time track smoothly can scarcely call
himself an auditor as that's all there is to audit besides postulates, no
matter what process you are using, no matter what process you invent and
even if you tried what is laughingly called a "biochemical approach" to the
mind. There's only a time track for the bios to affect.
There's a thetan, there's a time track. The thetan gets caught in the time
track. The job of the auditor is to free the theta n by digging him out of
his time track. So if you can't handle what you're digging a thetan out of,
you're going to have an awful lot of landslides and a lot of auditing loses
for both you and preclears.
Invent games, devices, charts and training aids galore and teach with
them and you'll have auditors who can handle the time track and run
engrams.
CHARGE AND THE TIME TRACK
Charge, the stored quantities of energy in the time track, is the sole
thing that is being relieved or removed by the auditor from the time track.
When this charge is present in huge amounts the time track overwhelms
the pc and the pc is thrust below observation of the actual track.
This is the State of Case Scale. (All levels given are major levels.
Minor levels exist between them.)
Level (1) NO TRACK - No charge
Level (2) FULL VISIBLE TIME TRACK - Some charge
Level (3) SPORADIC VISIBILITY OF
TRACK - Some heavily charged areas.
Level (4) INVISIBLE TRACK - Very heavily charged areas
(Black or Invisible Field.) exist.
Level (5) DUB-IN - Some areas of track so heav
ily charged pc is below
consciousness in them.
Level (6) DUB-IN OF DUB-IN - Many areas of track so
heavily charged, the dub-in
is submerged.
Level (7) ONLY AWARE OF OWN - Track too heavily charged
EVALUATIONS to be viewed at all.
Level (8) UNAWARE - Pc dull, often in a coma.
On this new scale the very good, easy to run cases are at Level (3).
Skilled engram running can handle down to Level (4). Engram running is
useless from Level (4) down. Level (4) is questionable.
Level (1) is of course an OT. Level (2) is the clearest Clear anybody
ever heard of. Level (3) can run engrams. Level (4) can run early track
engrams if the running is skilled. (Level (4) includes the Black V case.)
Level (5) has to be run on general ARC processes. Level (6) has to be run
carefully on special ARC processes with lots of havingness. Level (7)
responds to the CCHs. Level (8) responds only to reach and withdraw CCHs.
Pre-Dianetic and Pre-Scientology mental studies were observations from
Level (7) which considered Levels (5) and (6) and (8) the only states of
case and oddly enough overlooked Level (7) entirely, all states of case
were considered either neurotic or insane, with sanity either slightly
glimpsed or decried.
In actuality on some portion of every time track in every case you will
find each of the levels except (I) momentarily expressed. The above scale
is devoted to chronic case level and is useful in programming a case. But
any case for brief moments or
longer will hit these levels in being processed. This is the temporary case
level found only in sessions on chronically higher level cases when they go
through a tough bit.
Thus engram running can be seen to be limited to higher level cases.
Other processing, notably modern ARC processes, moves the case up to engram
running.
Now what makes these levels of case?
It is entirely charge. The more heavily charged the case, the lower it
falls on the above scale. It is charge that prevents the pc from
confronting the time track and submerges the time track from view.
Charge is stored energy or stored or recreatable potentials of energy.
The E-Meter registers charge. A very high or low tone arm, a sticky or
dirty needle, all are registrations of this charge. The "chronic meter of a
case" is an index of chronic charge. The fluctuations of a meter during a
session are registering relative charge in different portions of the pc's
time track.
More valuably the meter registers released charge. You can see it
blowing on the meter. The disintegrating RR, the blowing down of the TA,
the heavy falls, the loosening needle all show charge being released.
The meter registers charge found and then charge released. It registers
charge found but not yet released by the needle getting tight, by DN, by a
climbing TA or a TA going far below the clear read. Then as this cleans up,
the charge is seen to "blow."
Charge that is restimulated but not released causes the case to "charge
up," in that charge already on the time track is triggered but is not yet
viewed by the pc. The whole cycle of restimulated charge that is then blown
gives us the action of auditing. When PRIOR charge is restimulated but not
located so that it can be blown, we get "ARC breaks."
The State of Case, the chronic level, as given on the above scale, is
the totality of charge on the case. Level (1) has no charge on it. Level
(8) is total charge. The day to day condition of a case, its temper,
reaction to things, brightness, depends upon two factors, (a) the totality
of charge on the case and (b) the amount of charge in restimulation. Thus a
case being processed varies in tone by (a) the totality of charge remaining
on the case (b) the amount of charge in restimulation and � the amount of
charge blown by processing.
Charge is held in place by the basic on a chain. When only later than
basic incidents are run charge can be restimulated and then bottled up
again with a very small amount blown. This is known as "grinding out" an
incident. An engram is getting run, but as it is not basic on a chain, no
adequate amount of charge is being released.
Later than basic incidents are run either (a) to uncover more basic
(earlier) incidents or (b) to clean up the chain after basic has been found
and erased.
No full erasure of incidents later than basic is possible, but charge
can be removed from them providing they are not ground out but only run
lightly a time or two and then an earlier incident on the chain found and
similarly run. When the basic is found it is erased by many passes over it.
Basic is the only one which can be run many times. The later the incident
is (the further from basic) the more lightly it is run .
There is no difference in the technology required to run a basic or a
later incident. It is only the number of times THROUGH that differs. Basic
is run through many times. A somewhat later engram is run through a couple
of times. An engram very late on the chain is gone through once. Otherwise
all engrams whether basic or not are run exactly the same.
Engrams are run to release charge from a ease. Charge is not released to
cure the body or to cure anything physical and the meter cures nothing.
Charge is released entirely to return to a thetan his causation over the
time track, to restore his power of choice, and to free him of his most
intimate trap, his own time track. You cannot have decent, honest or
capable beings as long as they are trapped and overwhelmed. While this
philosophy may be contrary to the intentions of a slavemaster or a degrader
it is nevertheless demonstrably true. The universe is not itself a trap
capable only of degradation. But beings exist who, beaten and overwhelmed
themselves, can utilize this universe to degrade others.
The mission of engram running is to free the charge which has
accumulated in a being and so restore that being to appreciated life.
All eases, sooner or later, have to be run on engrams, no matter what
else has to be done. For it is in engrams that the bulk of the charge on
the time track lies. And it is therefore those parts of the time track
called engrams which overwhelm the thetan. These contain pain and
unconsciousness and are therefore the record of moments when a thetan was
most at effect and least at cause. In these moments then the thetan is
least able to confront or to be causative.
The engram also contains moments when it was necessary to have moved
and most degrading to have held a position in space.
And the engram contains the heaviest ARC break with a thetan's
environment and other beings.
And all these things add up to charge, an impulse to withdraw from that
which can't be withdrawn from or to approach that which can't be
approached, and this, like a two pole battery, generates current. This
constantly generated current is chronic charge. The principal actions are:
(a) When the attention of the thetan is directed broadly in the direction
of such a track record the current increases.
(b) When the attention is more closely (but not forcefully) and
accurately directed, the current is discharged.
(c) When the basic on the chain is found and erased, that which composes
the poles themselves is erased and later incidents eased, for no
further generation is possible by that chain and it becomes incapable
of producing further charge to be restimulated. The above are the
actions which occur during auditing. If these actions do not occur
despite auditing, then there is no case betterment, so it is the
auditor's responsibility to make sure they do occur.
As the time track is created by an involuntary response of the thetan,
it is and exists as a real thing, composed of space, matter, energy, time
and significance. On a Level (8) Case the time track is completely
submerged by charge even down to a total unawareness of thought itself. At
Level (7) awareness of the track is confined by extant charge to opinions
about it. At Level (6) charge on the track is such that pictures of
pictures of the track are gratuitously furnished, causing delusive copies
of inaccurate copies of the track. At Level (5) charge is sufficient to
cause only inaccurate copies of the track to be viewable. At Level (4)
charge is sufficient to obscure the track. At Level (3) charge is
sufficient to wipe out portions of the track. At Level (2) there is only
enough charge to maintain the existence of the track. At Level (1) there is
no charge and no track to create it. All charge from Level (1) and up into
higher states that is generated is knowingly generated by the thetan, whose
ability to hold locations in space and poles apart results in charge as
needful.
This would degenerate again as he put such matters on automatic or
began once more to make a time track, but these actions alone are not
capable of aberrating a thetan until he encounters further violent
degradation and entrapment in the form of implants.
Aberration itself must be calculated to occur. The existence of a time
track only makes it possible for it to occur and be retained.
Thus a thetan's first real mistake is to consider his own pictures and
their recorded events important, and his second mistake is in not
obliterating entrapment activities in such a way as not to become entrapped
or aberrated in doing so, all of which can be done and should be.
Engram running is a step necessary to get at the more fundamental
causes of a time track and handle them.
So it is a skill which must be done and done well.
L. RON HUBBARD
Revision assisted by
Jill Steinberg
Editor "Dianetics Today"
LRH:JS:pat.dr
Copyright � 1963, 1977, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF MARCH 10, 1964
Class VI Students
Central Orgs
for info
SCIENTOLOGY VI
BASIC AUDITING
NON-READING METERS
METER FLINCH
There are various reasons a pc does not read on a meter. Amongst these
are:
1) ARC broken (where only the ARC break's bypassed charge will read)
2) Antipathy to meter
3) Antipathy to auditor
4) Antipathy to something in the session environment
5) Suppress button out (but Suppress itself will read)
6) Invalidate button out (but Invalidate will read)
7) Meter somewhere not connected to pc
8) Meter battery flat
9) Auditor on the wrong track (probably the commonest source of a dead
looking
meter that won't RR or fall hard)
10) Meter locked up on a wrong goal (happens mostly on running items in a
wrong
goal)
11) Overlisting a goal or item list
12) Getting into a GPM in an earlier series.
But of all the reasons the one least suspected is (13) pc flinch.
After a pc has been knocked around with creaks or pain by actual GPMs,
the pc decides a lot of things like "go easy on it" and "just sit here" and
"keep away from it" and even "I can't take it." And bang, no checkout
reads.
"Are you flinching" is a question that will RR on a flat meter if the
pc is. Don't overuse it. Usually you're just on a wrong track.
You may even waste time with a new Prepcheck on the meter only to find
your first Prepcheck on it is flat. The truth is, the pc is rabbiting.
Don't blame the pc too much. The pain can be horrible from GPMs.
But remember this-the only things that turn on pain are:
(a) Invalidating or suppressing a RIGHT GOAL. A wrong goal can have its
but tons out a mile and just make the pc a little dizzy. Only a RIGHT goal
can make the pc HURT or turn on a chronic-looking somatic.
(b) A RIGHT goal in the wrong series, which is to say a skip of GPMs.
Only (a) and (b) can make the pc hurt.
So if the pc hurts ask (a) or (b). If it's (a) get the Suppress, Invalidate
buttons in fast. If (b) get the right goal series, or find what's skipped.
(a) and (b) can be in combination.
And then get off any of the considerations a pc may have had about not
going near GPMs and you'll avoid future flinch.
The Invalidation read of a GPM can be dated and the invalidated GPM can
be looked up or otherwise relocated. Only right goals handled wrong hurt
and only this makes a pc flinch.
By the way, if the pain of a suppressed or invalidated GPM doesn't
vanish when the buttons are put in, then there's another right goal
suppressed or invalidated also! Or maybe more!
A pc who is consistently flinching needs the subjects of goals, etc.,
cleaned up.
LRH:dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 OCTOBER 1966
Issue IV
Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats
Students
EXAMINATIONS
A student must not discuss any examination with anyone outside the
Qualifications Division. To give examination information to other students
in order to assist them shows a misguided understanding of help. A student
should pass an examination on the basis that he does know and can apply the
data, not on the basis that he knows and can pass the examination. Only by
being able to know and apply the data can a student be an accomplished
auditor at any level.
Therefore, students are not to discuss examinations with other students
for whatever reason.
Further, students who fail examinations or any question thereon are not
to discuss such failure or reasons for such with anyone other than the
personnel of the Qualifications Division. This regulation includes not only
other students, but Course Supervisors. Data as to examination failures is
supplied from the Qualifications Division to the Technical Division, and a
student, not knowing the data sufficiently well, can cause Dev-T by
reporting false data to a Course Supervisor as to why the examination was
failed.
Any student who feels that he has been incorrectly failed on an
examination can report the matter to Ethics. This is the proper line for
any complaint the student may have concerning an examination, if such still
seems incorrect after taking it up with the Qualifications Division.
LRH:rd.sb L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1966 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968
Class VIII
ARBITRARIES
Any arbitrary entered into any line is a way to stop that line.
An auditor doing a job of auditing suddenly enters an arbitrary such as
"The pc now has a grief charge so he must have a withhold as I've just
cleaned up ARC breaks." Or any such wild think. This arbitrary would stop
that pc's case right now.
You get all there is to know about tech from HCOBs, tapes, books.
This is all.
Here's one-when the needle on an E-Meter read in the response to an
auditor's question, all you know is that the needle on the E-Meter read.
That's all you know. Now in the next few seconds you will prove out, as to
whether the read was to the question or to something else like a protest.
To assume anything else in regard to meter reads is an arbitrary and will
close up that pc with a bang.
That's the data. Knock off all the arbitraries NOW.
Punch in hard standard tech. Standard tech is that tech which has
absolutely no arbitraries.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.ja.pc
Copyright � 1968
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968
Class VIII
WORKABILITY OF TECH
The quality of technology is to the degree it increases percentages of
cures it obtains within the framework of the society in which it operates.
22 1/2% will change for the better or "get well" on sugar pills. 33% will
make it regardless of how the tech is applied. The percentages from these
on up are determined by the formula.
Early Dianetics with a raw book auditor run well over 50%.
Then into Scientology shot the percentages up to 97%, 3% here being
those heavily PTS and so on. Even these are being handled with standard
tech eventually.
These percentages are all inclusive of all possible tech errors because
we do get the percentages finally.
This then shows that Scientology technology, when applied by standard
tech action, will give a fantastic percentage of successes to the auditor
who does only standard tech actions.
The older practices have a very hard time showing 10% even though 22
1/2% recover on sugar pills.
The quality of Scientology technology is in the percentages, provable
and observable.
The workability of Scientology can be shown. Do so. Older practices
can't.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 AUGUST 1968
Class VIII
THE CLASS VIII COURSE
The Class VIII Course will teach the entire subject of Scientology in
its exact standard practical applications from ARC Straightwire to OTs.
The course will be exactly taught as per HCOBs, tapes, books.
The course will include-
Qs Logics-Prelogics, Axioms
Auditor's Code
Code of a Scientologist
F/N data
TRs
E-Meter Essentials
Book of Case Remedies
All about the E-Meter
Case supervision
Review folders
How to run ARC Straightwire
How to run locks on secondaries
How to run secondaries
How to run locks on engrams
How to run engrams
How to run Level 0 and process of that level
How to run Level 1, PTPs
How to run Level 2, O/Ws, M/W/H, Sec Check
Listing and nulling data-S & D, L4A, Rem A & B
Level 3, ARC breaks, L-1
Level 4, hidden standards
Power, Level 5
Level 6
Clear
OT I
OT II
OT III
OT IV
OT V
OT VI
OT VII
OT VIII.
How to handle exact data of the levels will be taught and data
necessary to the level, as not doing standard actions are all that hang a
case up, no matter what level a case is from-Straightwire to OT VIII.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
CASE SUPERVISOR
ADMIN IN AUDITING
A Case Supervisor cannot do a decent job of C/S when he is presented
with lousy admin such as-no Auditor Report Forms, not handling Gr Form
reads as they occur, not writing in F/Ns, not making a ring around the item
found, not indicating where a list was extended. Also illegible writing,
failure to go over a report when done and make obscure words plain in print
is a NO REPORT and gets liability.
When you run into a snag you can't handle, DON'T start inventing tech
and doing something else other than the C/S instructions.
End off the session and send it to the Case Supervisor.
It is, I am told, the wild fashion in Quals and HGCs around the world
that if one hits a snag, the auditor rushes out and asks the D of P who
gives him an unusual solution without even looking at a folder. If I catch
or hear of anyone doing that, it's the Deep 6.
The CORRECT action and the ONLY correct action is to end the session
and get folder and session paper to a Case Supervisor, who (I) does not see
the pc and (2) does not talk to the auditor.
Case Super is folder ONLY. Then there's a chance of standard tech.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH :jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
FLUNKS
These are the most common goofs found made by auditors in case
supervising over a hundred folders.
(1) Pc audited with no instructions from C/S.
(2) Audited on squirrel process.
(3) False Auditor Report-FLUNK FLUNK.
(4) Audited past F/N.
(5) Auditing a pc while on medication.
(6) Auditing a pc while ill.
(7) Leaving pc with a problem.
(8) Auditing a pc on no sleep.
(9) Nulling an L1 to largest read.
(10) Not giving pc his item.
(11) Not tracing an ARC break, M/W/H or PTP down to basic when it
doesn't blow.
(12) Not handling reading GF items as they occur.
(13) Failure to use ruds on even (;F when TA rises between session
before starting major action of session.
(14) Not following C/S instructions.
(15) Taking frequent breaks.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.wa
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead. Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
"STANDARD" TECH DATA
"Standard" in standard tech auditing is a precise activity, done with
good TRs, exact grade processes and exact actions.
A Green Form is done by handling every read, not by "uhuh" or nulling
it, or doing it after the GF is all done.
Observe the Auditor's Code in every line and do the usual and solve the
case.
Standard action in handling Green Form ARC Brks PTP and M/W/H (a) Itsa
(b) If not cleared on Itsa get the basic on the chain. All GF and L and
ruds follow this rule. A process is not used except ARC break ARCU CDEI.
Always do a list like L1, L4 or GF, etc., by handling each read as it's
found.
Random auditing on pcs and pre-OTs should not be done. Knock off these
arbitrary "Somebody else thinks he needs a_____." This is evaluative and a
break of the Auditor's Code. Pcs can be stopped by over-repairs they just
need to get on with it.
Do standard GF and remedy actions and let pc or pre-OT get on with the
next cycle of section or grade.
It's the grade processes and OT levels that improve cases. The process
the pc should be on is always the next grade.
If TA rises between sessions. get it down with ruds and if that doesn't
get it down, a Green Form. This is a standing order. TAs that won't come
down with routine rudiments come down with GF.
True of ALL rehabbing actions is you don't rehab on a high TA at
session start. Only when it is just then overrun. Then you rehab it back to
F/N.
In ruds, all you know when you see a read is that the meter read and
the question you asked. The meter read is not uniformly what you asked and
can be a protest or a REPEATING FALSE READ. Usually one goes right along
auditing but when pc shows any sign of protest or bafflement on a rud read,
you routinely trace it for an earlier false read, find and clean it.
If an R/S won't clean up on a pc, clean up "Have you ever been accused
of things you haven't done" as a process as the R/S may be from
invalidation. Can also clean up protest.
R/S on a child may be:
(A) Don't tell. Somebody told him not to.
(B) Crime.
(C) Accusation-said you did something you didn't do.
You set up a case with F/N before you undertake major new actions.
Always set up a case to be run. End off an action at F/N.
It's not safe to begin a session without an ARC Br check when there's
been a time between sessions.
With pcs in sad effect, you should always check ARC break of long duration.
You treble time in session every time you take any breaks. To economize
in auditing time (session time) you should cut out breaks as they get the
pc in trouble when he's out of the room, then you have to clean it up and
so time is lost.
No TA on a Sec Check means pc tends to be out of valence. Anybody has a
few.
TA goes high and low when a pc is going into and to PT from a heavy
past life.
Never tell a pc he will have another session in session as it continues
the session and doesn't end it. An old old old rule.
You never let pc off cans in standard tech.
A persistent item that doesn't blow is usually a wrong item. Other
symptoms could proceed from a wrong item.
A Prepcheck in nearly every case turns on and uncovers old ARC breaks.
In doing a Prepcheck be alert for BIs, and ask ARC Br question.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jp. ja
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968
(Amended 20 Sept 68)
Class VIII
VALENCE SHIFTER
The list question, "What valence (identity) would be safe" is based on
tech theory and is used for pre-OTs with high OT sections that do not
change non-optimum behaviour.
It is also (rarely) used on a lower grade case who is "detached" which
is to say chronically out of valence to the point of no case gain.
It is very dynamite-be exact in listing it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
C/S INSTRUCTIONS
Standard action for an old-timer who has been run on thousands of hours
on all types of processes:
(1) Do GF.
(2) Do an S & D
(3) List "What has been overrun," handling and indicating each item
as it reads.
(4) Rehab all grades, Sub-Zeroes, 0-14 (omit Power).
(5) Rehab R6EW, Clearing Course, OT I, OT II.
(6) Prepcheck III. Watch for ARC breaks during Prepcheck and handle
as they arise.
(7) Rehab IV, V and VI if done.
(8) Do a Valence Shifter.
A standard one-time action for a Section III OT:
(1) Get in ruds so TA is in decent range (2 to 3). If TA doesn't
come down and F/N on ruds, do a GF.
(2) Rehab or run ARC Straightwire to IV (omit Power always after
Clear).
(3) Rehab F/Ns R6EW, Clear, OT I, OT II.
(4) Prepcheck Section III.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
Pc looking or continually feeling tired = blunted purpose, evaluation
and invalidation .
M/W/H gives a nattery critical aspect, not "Pc looks tired" as one
auditor thought.
Pc feels tired. Do a purpose list as follows:
What purpose has been blunted? (You can also use "abandoned" if it
reads better.) Find an item. If no F/N, Prepcheck it to F/N.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
The first thing I learned about teaching a Class VIII auditor is he
thinks he can fly before he can even creep.
Such is the power of standard tech, it can go to his head as an auditor
and as a Case Supervisor before he learns even the barest essentials.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
END PHENOMENA
An auditor must be able to relate all of the end phenomena of a process
to an F/N in clay. This must be compared also to a cycle of action.
The object of the exercise is to tell when not to and when to cut a
preclear's comm with regard to an F/N.
Phenomena of pc occurs after phenomena of meter.
Skill to be learnt by the Class VIII auditor is the precise instant to
tell the pc it's an F/N.
Criticism of auditor's TRs actually stemmed from the auditor's
inability to see when a cycle of action is complete and cut the pc's comm
off at precisely the right instant so it doesn't cut the pc's cycle of
action and so it doesn't turn off the F/N.
If the pc's comm is cut wrong the pc tries to conclude it to everyone
they meet and so overruns the process, that is why pcs don't come back into
session with an F/N.
This is a vitally important datum because it has slown cases down to
total recovery when violated.
This has been an unforeseen factor in C/S of Class VIII auditing.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
REHABS
Old no longer used processes such as "3GXX" "R2-12" have to be added to
C/S ordered rehabs, particularly if the pc talks of them which means they
were overrun.,
All these early ones were overrun. Clear (meaning Release) was lost in
1950, recovered in about '58, lost again until my C/Sing of the first Power
noted the phenomena of overrun.
Overrun was therefore the order of the day. But these processes did
bring about genuine releases.
It is best to count the number of times released on each process and
rehab each different one.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING
Rudiments (ARC Bks, PTPs, M/W/Hs) are usually not necessary in
correcting a list as a wrong list usually is the ARC Bk and PTP.
To correct a list ask the pc or pre-OT
(1) "Is it an incomplete list?" If it is, extend it and find the
item.
(2) "Was it the first item on the list?" If so, indicate item to pc
or pre-OT.
(3) "Was it an unnecessary action?" (dead horse). If so, indicate
it.
(4) "Had you not answered the listing question?" If so, re-clear
question and if it reads list it.
The 4 basic reasons for a wrong list are here
(1) It was the first item.
(2) It is not a complete list.
(3) The question didn't read (which causes a dead horse).
(4) The pc didn't answer the question.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1968
Class VIII
The study of the "Well Done" LRH C/S Folder-the actual sessions
themselves, makes the difference between a probable six months or 3-week
course.
This is the difference between making auditors and not making auditors
and anyone who removes them from the line will be shot.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1968
(Amended 29/10/68)
Class VIII
LIST CORRECTION
(Only valid for a list recently done)
1. Was it the first item on the list?
2. Was list incomplete?
3. Was the item bypassed?
4. Was the item suppressed?
5. Was the item invalidated?
6. Was the question meaningless?
7. Was the list overlisted?
8. Were items thought of that weren't put down?
9. Was it listed out of session?
10. Was the item different when said by the auditor?
11. Was the item not given to you?
12. Was the action unnecessary?
13. Was a Release point bypassed, on the question only?
14. Was a Release point bypassed on listing?
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 OCTOBER 1968
AOs
Class VIII
ADVANCE COURSES
YOU MUST NEVER ISSUE AN ADVANCE COURSE TO ANYONE WITHOUT CASE
SUPERVISOR OKAY.
These pre-OTs are often in Review, often not ready and ALWAYS must be
okayed by the C/S both to have it and then after study, to fly the ruds.
To not do this means you're running Advance Courses on people with OUT
RUDS. You'll wreck cases this way!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 OCTOBER 1968
Class VIII
Pre-OTs who have been audited for a long time over out ruds will not
respond to the OT IV Rundown unless every rud is gotten in.
When putting in the ruds on such pcs, you put in suppress and false
reads on each one, each to F/N.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 OCTOBER 1968
Class VIII
ARC BRK NEEDLE
An ARC Brk needle (and a Stage 4 "float") are EASILY DETECTED.
An "F/N" with bad indicators is an ARC Brk needle. These can include
propitiation.
A Class VIII must know the Bad Indicator List and know that when these
accompany an "F/N" it is an ARC Brk needle.
When this happens, one checks for SESSION ARC BREAKS, then for MISSED
ARC BREAK, then for falsely called ARC Brks or suppressed ARC Brks. If this
doesn't clean it, then ask for an ARC Brk long duration.
What has happened is that the pc has gone into a secondary or an
engram.
It is not a job for rudiments to run it. It is only to be keyed-out.
It is a Q and A to date and run a secondary in rudiments because of an
ARC Brk needle. The auditor is to key it out by session or life. Itsa and
earlier similar incident with itsa, each ARC break with ARCU CDEI.
The C/S can have it run as a secondary. It will be TOO HEAVY to run if
it is not keyed-out first. It is handled by key-out in rudiments.
It is quite usual that a pc has just mentioned grief when the ARC: Br
needle turns on. Or some gloomy idea. A real F/N means the pc is out the
top, an ARC Br needle means he's out the bottom. He ceases to mock up,
through grief.
It is a very serious thing for a pc to get audited over an ARC Br
needle. It must be spotted and handled (keyed-out) when it occurs.
It occurs most often with a TA below 2.0.
A real F/N has one or more GIs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ja
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 OCTOBER 1968R
REVISED 9 JULY 1977
Remimeo
Corrected & Reissued 15 July 1977
to correct typo, para 3.
(Deletes reference to needle "R/Sing" before an F/N.)
FLOATING NEEDLE
Floating needles (F/Ns) are the end phenomena for any process or action
with the pc on two cans. It is one of the most important rediscoveries made
in years. It was known but lost by auditors.
It is the idle uninfluenced movement of the needle on the dial without
any patterns or reactions in it. It can be as small as 1" or as large as
dial wide. It does not fall or drop to the right of the dial. It moves to
the left at the same speed as it moves to the right. It is observed on a
Mark V E-Meter calibrated with the TA between 2.0 and 3.0 with GIs in on
the pc. It can occur after a cognition blowdown of the TA or just moves
into floating. The pc may or may not voice the cognition.
It, by the nature of the E-Meter reading below the awareness of the
thetan, occurs just before the pc is aware of it. So to give a "That's it"
on the occurrence of the F/N can prevent the pc from getting the cognition.
A "floating needle" occurring above 3.0 or below 2.0 on a calibrated
Mark V E-Meter with the pc on 2 cans is an ARC broken needle. Watch for the
pc's indicators. An ARC broken needle can occur between 2.0 and 3.0 where
bad indicators are apparent.
Pcs and pre-OTs OFTEN signal an F/N with a "POP" to the left and the
needle can actually even describe a pattern much like a rock slam. Meters
with lighter movements do "pop" to the left.
One does not sit and study and be sure of an "F/N." It swings or pops,
he lets the pc cognite and then indicates the F/N to the pc preventing
overrun.
When one OVERRUNS an F/N or misses one, the TA will start to climb. The
thing to do is briefly rehabilitate it (rehab it) by indicating it has been
bypassed and so regains it.
The F/N does not last very long in releasing. The thing to do is end
the process off NOW. Don't give another command.
It coincides with other "end phenomena" of processes but is senior to
them.
An F/N can be in normal range and still be an ARC break needle. The
thing which determines a real F/N is good indicators. Bad indicators always
accompany an ARC break needle.
On an ARC break needle, check for an ARC break. If the TA then climbs,
it was a real F/N so you rehab it quickly.
A one-hand electrode sometimes obscures an F/N and gives false TA. If
used, use higher sensitivity and get the TA from 2 cans when needed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
CS-4/5
LRH:JE;ja;If
Copyright � 1968, 1977 As ordered by
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1968
Issue II
Class VIII
OVERT-MOTIVATOR
DEFINITIONS
These are problems in FLOWS.
They exist with or without intention.
One can add "intentional" or "unintentional" to the definitions.
An OVERT-An act by the person or individual leading to the injury,
reduction or degradation of another, others or their beingness, persons,
possessions, associations or dynamics.
A MOTIVATOR is an act received by the person or individual causing
injury, reduction or degradation of his beingness, person, associations or
dynamics.
An overt of omission-a failure to act resulting in the injury,
reduction or degradation of another or others or their beingness, persons,
possessions or dynamics.
A motivator is called a "motivator" because it tends to prompt an
overt. It gives a person a motive or reason or justification for an overt.
When a person commits an overt or overt of omission with no motivator
he tends to believe or pretends that he has received a motivator which does
not in fact exist. This is a FALSE MOTIVATOR.
Beings suffering from this are said to have "motivator hunger" and are
often aggrieved over nothing.
Cases which "cave in hard" suffer from false motivators and resolve on
being asked for overts done for no reason.
Cases which do not resolve on actual motivators have overts that have
to be handled.
There is also the case with FALSE OVERTS. The person has been hit hard
for no reason. So they dream up reasons they were hit.
Cases that go into imaginary cause (imagining they do or cause things
bad or good) are suffering from false overt . They resolve on "When were
you hit (punished, hurt, etc.) for no reason?"
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 DECEMBER 1968
Class VIII
UNRESOLVING CASES
The mechanism of PTS is environmental menace that keeps something
continually keyed-in. This can be a constant recurring somatic or
continual, recurring pressure or a mass. The menace in the environment is
NOT imaginary in such extreme cases.
The action can be taken to key it out. But if the environmental menace
is actual and persists it will just key-in again. This gives recurring
pressure unrelieved by usual processing.
In this event one can compare the environmental menace (by finding it,
listing, 2-way comm etc.) and one will then find the incident or incidents
being keyed-in are exactly similar in all respects or are thought so. These
can be run out as secondaries or engrams.
Theoretically an environmental continual overt would do the same thing.
In which case the secondary or engram would match it. This is in fact the
only engrams that will run and erase on a PTS case.
Personal roller-coaster has this as its source.
The person does not see or associate the two.
This is why the PTS case does not respond to processing and gives a way
for it to respond. This is also why the sick and insane do not respond. It
is the same mechanism.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:bw
Copyright � 1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1968RA
(Amends HCO Bulletin of 9 January 1968 List L4A)
Remimeo (ITEM 6 CORRECTED 12 FEBRUARY 1969)
(Amended 8 August 1970)
(Amended 18 March 1971)
(Revised 2 June 72)
(Re-Revised 11 April 1977)
(Revisions in this type style)
L4BRA
FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING ERRORS
ASSESS THE WHOLE LIST (METHOD 5) THEN TAKE biggest reads or BDs and
handle. Then clean up the list.
PC'S NAME_____________________________________DATE________________
AUDITOR__________________________________
0. WAS IT THE FIRST ITEM ON THE LIST?
(Indicate and give pc his item.)
1. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THE LISTING QUESTION?
(If it reads, find out what question, clear the question noting
whether it reads, if so, list it, find the item and give it to the pc.)
2. WAS THE LIST UNNECESSARY?
(If it reads, indicate BPC and indicate that it was an unnecessary
action.)
2A. DID THE QUESTION HAVE NO CHARGE ON IT?
( Indicate. )
2B. WERE YOU ASHAMED TO CAUSE AN UPSET?
(L1C after list corrected.)
2C. WERE YOU AMAZED TO REACT THAT WAY?
(Same as 2B.)
2D. THE QUESTION HAD ALREADY BEEN LISTED BEFORE.
(Indicate, rehab.)
2E. YOU HAD NO INTEREST IN THE QUESTION?
(Indicate that the auditor missed that it didn't read.)
3. WAS THE ACTION DONE UNDER PROTEST?
(If it reads, handle by itsa earlier similar itsa.)
4. IS A LIST INCOMPLETE?
(If reads, find out what list and complete it, give the pc his item.)
5. HAS A LIST BEEN LISTED TOO LONG?
(If so, find what list and get the item from it by nulling with
Suppress, the nulling question being: "On has anything been
suppressed?" for each item on the overlong list. Give the pc his item.)
6. HAS THE WRONG ITEM BEEN TAKEN OFF A LIST?
(If this reads, put in Suppress and Invalidated on the list and null
as in 5 above and find the right item and give to the pc.)
7. HAS A RIGHT ITEM BEEN DENIED YOU?
(If this reads, find out what it was and clean it up with Suppress
and Invalidate and give it to the pc.)
8. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PUSHED OFF ON YOU YOU DIDN'T WANT?
(If so, find it and get in Suppress and Invalidate on it and tell pc
it wasn't his item and continue the original action to find the correct
item.)
9. HAD AN ITEM NOT BEEN GIVEN YOU?
(if reads, handle as in 7.)
10. HAVE YOU INVALIDATED A CORRECT ITEM FOUND?
(If so, rehab the item and find out why the pc invalidated it or if
somebody else did it, clean it up and give it to pc again.)
11. HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF ITEMS THAT YOU DID NOT PUT ON THE LIST?
(If so, add them to the correct list. Renull the whole list and give
the pc the item.)
12. HAVE YOU BEEN LISTING TO YOURSELF OUT OF SESSION?
(If so, find out what question and try to write a list from recall
and get an item and give it to the pc.)
13. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN SOMEBODY ELSE'S ITEM?
(If so, indicate to the pc this was not his item. Don't try to find
whose it was.)
14. HAS YOUR ITEM BEEN GIVEN TO SOMEONE ELSE?
(If so, find if possible what item it was and give it to the pc.
Don't try to identify the "somebody else.")
14A. WERE EARLIER LISTING ERRORS RESTIMULATED?
(Indicate and correct earlier lists then check the current.)
14B. HAD THIS LIST ALREADY BEEN HANDLED?
(Indicate.)
15. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BYPASSED ON LISTING?
(If so, indicate the overrun to the pc, rehab back.)
16. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BYPASSED ON THE QUESTION ONLY?
(If so, indicate the overrun to the pc and rehab back.)
17. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR WHILE LISTING?
(If so, rehab. If Ext Rundown not given, note for C/S.)
18. HAS IT BEEN AN OVERT TO PUT AN ITEM ON A LIST?
(If so, find out what item and why.)
19. HAVE YOU WITHHELD AN ITEM FROM A LIST?
(If so, get it and add it to the list if that list available. If not
put item in the report.)
20. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED?
(If so, get it, if discreditable ask "Who nearly found out?")
21. HAS AN ITEM BEEN BYPASSED?
(Locate which one.)
22. WAS A LISTING QUESTION MEANINGLESS?
(If so, find out which one and indicate to the pc.)
23. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ABANDONED?
(If so, locate it and get it back for the pc and give it to him.)
24. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PROTESTED?
(If so, locate it and get the Protest button in on it.)
25. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ASSERTED?
(If so, locate it and get in the Assert button on it.)
26. HAS AN ITEM BEEN SUGGESTED TO YOU BY ANOTHER?
(If so, get it named and the Protest and Refusal off.)
27. HAS AN ITEM BEEN VOLUNTEERED BY YOU AND NOT ACCEPTED?
(If so, get off the charge and give it to the pc, or if he then
changes his mind on it, go on with the listing operation.)
28. HAS THE ITEM ALREADY BEEN GIVEN?
(If so, get it back and give it again.)
29. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FOUND PREVIOUSLY?
(If so, find what it was again and give it to the pc once more.)
30. HAS AN ITEM NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD?
(If so, work it over with buttons until pc understands it or accepts
or rejects it and go on with listing.)
30A. WAS THE LISTING QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD?
(Get defined and check for read. It may be unreading. If so, indicate
that an uncharged question was listed because it read on a
misunderstood.)
30B. WAS A WORD IN THE QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD?
(Same as 30A.)
31. WAS AN ITEM DIFFERENT WHEN SAID BY THE AUDITOR?
(If so, find out what the item was and give it to the pc correctly.)
31A. DID THE AUDITOR SUGGEST ITEMS TO YOU THAT WERE NOT YOURS?
(Indicate as illegal to do so. Correct the list removing these.)
32. WAS NULLING CARRIED ON PAST THE FOUND ITEM?
(If so, go back to it and get in Suppress and Protest.)
33. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FORCED ON YOU?
(If so, get off the Reject and Suppress and get the listing action
completed to the right item if possible.)
34. HAS AN ITEM BEEN EVALUATED?
(If so, get off the Disagreement and Protest.)
35. HAD EARLIER LISTING BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, locate when and indicate the bypassed charge. Find and
correct the earlier out list. )
36. HAS AN EARLIER WRONG ITEM BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, find when and indicate the bypassed charge. Find and correct
the earlier out list.)
37. HAS AN EARLIER ARC BREAK BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, locate and indicate the fact by itsa earlier similar itsa.)
38. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK BECAUSE OF BEING MADE TO DO THIS?
(If so, indicate it to the pc. Handle the ARC break. Correct the list
if it's a list ARC break.)
39. HAS THE LIST CORRECTION BEEN OVERRUN?
(If so, rehab.)
39A. WAS THE LIST DONE WHILE YOU ALREADY HAD AN ARC BRK, PTP OR W/H?
39B. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE?
39C. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THE AUDITOR?
39D. DIDN'T THE AUDITOR ACKNOWLEDGE YOU?
40. IS THERE SOME OTHER KIND OF BYPASSED CHARGE?
(If so, find what and indicate it to pc.)
41. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE?
(If so, indicate it to pc.)
42. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED?
(If so, indicate it to the pc.)
43. HAS A LIST PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN?
(If so, find which one and rehab.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by CS-4/5
LRH:JE:ldm.rw.dz..rr.nt.dr
Copyright � 1968, 1972, 1976, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 APRIL 1969RA
REVISED 28 JULY 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
DIANETIC ASSISTS
(Include in Medical Series)
The Use of Dianetics to the Medical Doctor
There is everything to be said for correct medical treatment in the
handling of the sick and insane.
"Insanity" is most often the suppressed agony of actual physical
illness and injury.
To "treat" this agony with shock and "brain operations" is a Nuremberg
type offense and is indictable as mayhem or manslaughter.
The medical treatment of "insanity" requires sure awareness by the
patient of his whereabouts and present time. These are usually quite
unbearable so he has sunk into the past to escape the agony of the present.
The TOUCH ASSIST given to such injured persons permits healing to occur
by restoring the person to the present and his whereabouts to some degree.
Healing after medical treatment might not occur rapidly if the "insane"
or chronically ill person remains in the past, unable to confront the
present.
Thus the Touch Assist speeds and often permits healing after medical
treatment and sometimes in minor injuries and illness permits the doctor to
accomplish healing without further treatment.
There is the TOUCH ASSIST, the CONTACT ASSIST and the AUDITING ASSIST.
The Touch Assist done as described elsewhere brings the patient's
attention to injured or affected body areas. When attention is withdrawn
from them, so is circulation, nerve flows and energy which for one thing
limits nutrition to the area and for another prevents the drain of waste
products. Some ancient healers attributed remarkable flows and qualities to
the "laying on of hands." Probably the workable element in this was simply
heightening awareness of the affected area and restoring the physical
communication factors.
The CONTACT ASSIST is remarkable when it can be done. The patient is
taken to the area where the injury occurred and makes the injured member
gently contact it several times. A sudden pain will fly off and the injury
if minor lessens or vanishes. This is again a physical communication
factor. The body member seems to have withdrawn from that exact spot in the
physical universe.
The restoration of awareness is often necessary before healing can
occur.
The prolongation of a chronic injury occurs in the absence of physical
communication with the affected area or with the location of the spot of
injury in the physical universe.
The AUDITING ASSIST is done by a trained auditor using an E-Meter.
It consists of "running out" the physically painful experience the person
has just undergone, accident, illness, operation or emotional shock. This
erases the "psychic trauma" and speeds healing to a remarkable degree if
done properly.
In addition to assists there is Dianetic auditing of an acutely ill
person which handles the current and past illnesses and injuries by erasing
the "physical trauma."
The last is a skilled activity. Practitioners who have the idea such
things do not have causes will of course fail to locate the causes.
A sickness can be composed, let us say, of a headache, a nausea, apathy
and weariness.
Such a sickness may be bizarre, without medical reason.
By first getting the patient to find and say what shock occurred when
the sickness began, getting when, and getting it recounted, the "illness"
will lessen, the emotional state will alter-called a "release of affect."
By then, finding an earlier similar instance and getting that one dated
and recounted a further release of affect may occur.
If the good indicators, smiles, etc. do not occur in the patient, one
again asks for an earlier incident, dates it and gets it recounted.
Physically sick persons divide into two classes: "acutely ill" and
"chronically ill." A person who is acutely ill is temporarily or
momentarily ill and a person who is chronically ill is simply ill all the
time.
You do not run heavy engram processes on an acutely ill pa. You do
Touch Assists and get a Scientology auditor to deliver processes given in
C/S Series 9, HCOB 21 June 1970, fourth section "Sick Pcs," Tech Bulletin
Volume VII, page 89.
You try not to run heavy engram chains on acutely ill pus as they are
physically not up to it, cannot stand sessions long enough to get anywhere
with a chain and usually all that happens is, the pa feels spinny and left
in a restimmed condition. You can run Touch Assists and light Objective
Processes.
On a chronically ill pa you can begin exactly as you would with an
acutely ill pa, with the difference that when he improves you can run out
the physically painful experience the person has just undergone with
Narrative R3RA. After this you can proceed with regular New Era Dianetics.
Needless to say all this requires a skilled auditor but the skill can
be acquired in a Dianetic training course.
The important thing is not to tell the patient what caused it, but to
let him tell you. Otherwise the symptom suppresses.
The approach in any of these assists is quiet, gentle, permissive,
never forcing the patient, speaking only the words required to do the
process.
The temporarily insane by reason of emotional shock, where no medical
illness exists, should be permitted rest and should then be handled by an
assist as above or normal Dianetic auditing. Most often, rest and no
further harassment result in a return to sanity in a short time such as a
few days, but not in a terror atmosphere such as a psychiatric asylum where
the patient is in the risk of being hurt or killed. Electric shock prolongs
the condition and brain surgery is of course not treatment but murder as at
best it deprives the person of his coordination and at worst shortens his
life. The occasional and rare brain tumor is of course an exception but
this is a medical not a psychiatric matter, no matter what manifestations
the person exhibits.
Most medically ill people do exhibit symptoms of mental derangement at some
stage of their illness.
The acceleration of healing of medical illness or injury such as broken
bones or the after effects of delivery or operations can be accomplished by
the Dianetic auditing of the resulting trauma soon after full medical
treatment or attention. The improvement factor is about 1/3 the normal time
of recovery by some thousands of test cases.
Such auditing is done by a usual Dianetic procedure.
In addition to the above assists there is regular Dianetic auditing
which handles chronic discomforts and prevents future illness as well as
improving the state of well-being of a person.
The mechanisms of the mind revealed in Dianetics are of great use to
the field of medicine.
They are easy and quick to apply.
About one month's training is all that is necessary to acquaint an
otherwise educated and intelligent person with the fundamentals and skills
necessary to assists.
Considerably more time of course is necessary to train a skilled
Scientology auditor, but this is not the subject of this paper.
There is no conflict of interest between any healing profession and
Dianetics. Dianetic materials and papers are fully available.
There is a conflict between Dianetics and political practices such as
psychiatry since electric shock, brain operations and general degradation
of the person may prevent the patient's recovery by Dianetics.
As answers exist now for insanity there is no reason to continue
medieval or Fascist solutions to the problem of the psychosomatically ill
or the insane and we are doing everything in our power against fantastic
opposition to end the torture and killing of the insane regardless of the
politically "desirable" ends envisioned by some groups.
Dianetics, like any other true treatment, like aspirin or penicillin,
was originally designed to handle the apparent basic cause of psychosomatic
illness. The first research was intended to help allied prisoners of war
degraded by the Japanese and Chinese prison camps and who after V-J day
were transferred to Oak Knoll Naval Hospital. Later, in 1954, in a much
more advanced state of development, Dianetics was successfully employed to
eradicate the results of allied prisoners of the Korean War who had been
subjected to Russian brainwashing. The subject has been improved, made
easier to teach and apply and its results bettered continually over a total
period of 29 years. It was in 1969... fully updated as Standard Dianetics.
In 1978 it has again been upgraded as New Era Dianetics. It is very
successful and is in very broad use over the world.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cib
Copyright � 1969. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1969R
REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Dianetics Checksheet
Class VIIIs (Revisions in this type style)
Dianetic Auditors (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION
Dianetics is done differently than Scientology in that its auditors are
trained up to New Era Dianetics Graduate only. Therefore they do not have
various skills you will find in a Scientology auditor. Even when they
become a Scientology auditor, Dianetics is still done as Dianetics.
Therefore knowledge and skill above and beyond the training level of
the New Era Dianetics Course is not to be expected of the New Era Dianetics
auditor.
There are also things in Book One we no longer use such as Repeater
Technique, looking for phrases to explain conditions.
We use Dianetics as it was re-worked in the early 60s and as currently
being presented in the New Era Dianetics Series.
If it isn't on the checksheet of the Dianetics Course, then we don't
demand it.
We do demand some skill with a meter and what a floating needle is.
If a Dianetic pc gets in trouble we send him to a Scientology auditor
for a review. In this review, all Scientology skills (but no grades) can be
done.
In review he can get in his rudiments, etc.
It is very worthy of note that in reviewing Dianetics or in doing
Dianetic auditing ONE CAN RUN OUT BAD SESSIONS AS AN AUDITOR OR PC BY USING
R3RA ON AUDITING SESSIONS OR THERAPY.
If we keep Dianetics to Dianetics we will again achieve the miracles of
which it is capable.
Dianetics has been refined greatly. But it is all there on the
checksheets now. There is no hidden data line.
It is far less complex today than it was in 1953, for instance, and
much more effective. But it is still Dianetics. It is a technology that
runs and erases locks, secondaries and engrams and their chains.
It should be case supervised and done with that fully in mind.
A New Era Dianetics auditor is a New Era Dianetics auditor. He can do
what he can do.
And it's marvellous.
LRH:dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969. 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1969RA
Remimeo REVISED 7 JULY 1978
Dn Checksheet RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class VIIIs
Tech Secs
(Revisions in this type style)
DIANETICS
BASIC DEFINITIONS
ERASURE is the action of erasing, rubbing out, locks, secondaries or
engrams. It occurs when the postulate made during the basic incident on the
chain is gotten off.
A LOCK is a mental image picture of an incident where one was knowingly
or unknowingly reminded of a secondary or engram. It does not itself
contain a blow or a burn or impact and is not any major cause of
misemotion. It does not contain unconsciousness. It may contain a feeling
of pain or illness, etc., but is not itself the source of it. Example: one
sees a cake, feels sick. This is a lock on an engram of being made sick by
eating cake. The picture of seeing a cake and feeling sick is a lock on (is
locked to) the incident (unseen at the moment) of getting sick eating cake.
When one finds a lock it can be run like any other mental image picture.
A SECONDARY is a mental image picture of a moment of severe and
shocking loss or threat of loss which contains misemotion such as anger,
fear, grief, apathy or "deathfulness." It is a mental image recording of a
time of severe mental stress. It may contain unconsciousness. When it is
restimulated by a similar but lighter experience another mental image
picture is recorded which becomes a lock on the secondary and serves to
keep the secondary alive. A secondary is called a secondary because it
itself depends upon an earlier engram with similar data but real pain, etc.
AN ENGRAM is a mental image picture which is a recording of a time of
physical pain and unconsciousness. It must by definition have impact or
injury as part of its content.
It is of the very greatest importance that a Dianetic auditor really
grasp what these things are. Otherwise he won't know what he is doing or to
what.
Now because he isn't seeing his preclear's pictures an auditor can
become very careless about them and not handle them correctly.
If an auditor doesn't really know what these things are (erasure,
locks, secondaries, engrams) he cannot of course hope to handle them for
the preclear.
The basic Dianetic errors are just not knowing what these are and that
they are there to be handled and that these and these alone cause
psychosomatic ills.
Once one has a full grip on these definitions he can then and only then
hope to do anything with them for the preclear.
If the auditor is going to handle the aches, pains, unwanted sensations
and psychosomatic illnesses of the preclear, it requires that he fully
grasp these basic definitions.
Literally millions of complications can stem from the simple fact that
a preclear records experiences in mental image pictures and that these
thereafter can affect HIS BODY adversely.
Once one really understands that mental image pictures are all there is in
the preclear's "mind" one has understood the total of aberration. There is
NOT something else there. No "id," no "ego." There are only mental image
pictures.
These, if you use the exact procedures of Dianetics, can be found and
erased.
When the unwanted locks, secondaries and engrams are erased the
preclear will be rid of the physical disabilities of which he complains and
will be well physically.
SOMATIC-means essentially body sensation, illness or pain or
discomfort. "Soma" means body. Hence PSYCHO SOMATIC or pains stemming from
the mind.
MISEMOTION-anything that is unpleasant emotion such as antagonism,
anger, fear, grief, apathy or a death feeling.
This is the entire breadth of Dianetics today.
In Scientology we deal with the thetan, the being who is the individual
and who handles and lives in the body. This is beyond the scope of today's
Dianetics.
If a preclear is well physically made so by Dianetics and any required
physical medication or nutrition, he can then embark on Scientology, the
increase of his abilities and spiritual freedom.
If a preclear who is being audited or has been audited on Scientology
grades becomes ill one DOES NOT TRY TO MAKE HIM WELL BY GIVING HIM NEW
HIGHER GRADES. That has been an error of great magnitude. Instead ONE
REVERTS TO DIANETIC AUDITING until the pc is well and only then continues
with Scientology.
This is correct procedure because it works.
People "come into Scientology" to cure their headaches. Somebody starts
them off on grade auditing, several grades later they still have their
headache. It is a continual present time problem to them and the auditor.
It sometimes vanishes during grade processing. This gives an unfortunate
win.
The right thing to have done was give the person DIANETIC AUDITING,
until he or she no longer had headaches and then begin to audit the person
on grades so as to put them well above ever again getting headaches.
Continual headaches come from mental image pictures retained by the pc
of having a head crushed or shot off or hit. That is an engram. It actually
had to happen. It is NOT imaginary or delusion. The proof is that when the
auditor finally erases the engram the recording of the injury is gone and
the headaches will not again occur.
The preclear often is unable to confront the actual engram at once. He
offers one a LOCK, a time when he had a headache. One "runs" this lock (one
always runs whatever is offered, you don't force the pc) and finds after
putting the preclear through it a couple of times that IT IS GETTING MORE
SOLID or it simply isn't erasing. One finds an earlier recording. This
possibly turns out to be a secondary. The pc had a moment of loss and cried
and also had a headache.
This secondary may or may not erase. If it does one leaves it of course
as finished. But if it goes more solid (shown by TA rising at the end of a
run through the incident-or if the pa says it is going more solid) one then
asks for an earlier incident.
One probably would then get the actual engram. a recording of a time
when the head was actually injured. The auditor runs this through and as
soon as he has completed a run through the incident and discovered (from
the rising TA or the pc) that the incident is going more solid, he asks for
an earlier incident.
This one erases.
When it erases the whole chain of headaches ALSO erases.
And that is the end of the pc's headaches period.
One then inquires after other somatics or sensations and handles them
the same way.
It is all done by using the technique called R3RA without variation.
Since these recordings contain mainly other-determinedness (pictures of
others doing things) the auditor always has more control over the
preclear's mental image pictures than the preclear does. Thus the pictures
do what the auditor says. This point too must be grasped by an auditor or
he will be waiting on the preclear to act or move in time.
The TIME TRACK is the consecutive record of mental image pictures which
accumulates through the preclear's life or lives. It is very exactly dated.
PLEASURE MOMENTS are mental image pictures containing pleasure
sensations. They respond to R3RA. One seldom addresses them unless the
preclear is fixated on some type of "pleasure" to a point where it has
become highly aberrated.
BLACK FIELD is just some part of a mental image picture where the
preclear is looking at blackness. It is part of some lock, secondary or
engram. In Scientology it can occur (rarely) when the pc is exterior,
looking at something black. It responds to R3RA.
INVISIBLE FIELD is just a part of some lock, secondary or engram that
is "invisible." It like a black field responds to R3RA.
PRESSURE SOMATIC is, in Dianetics, considered to be a symptom in a
lock, secondary or engram, simply part of the content.
Whatever, the symptom pain sensation, whatever, it is from either the
body directly (such as a broken bone, a gallstone or immediate physical
cause) or is part of the content of a mental image picture-lock, secondary
or engram.
The Dianetic auditor does not audit ideas or think. He is handling
mental recordings. Ideas are in them. Ideas come out of them. But think is
no longer part of Dianetics.
In Dianetics we handle locks, secondaries and engrams.
KEY-IN is the action of recording a lock on a secondary or engram.
KEY-OUT is an action of the engram or secondary dropping away without
being erased.
DIANETIC F/Ns ARE HANDLED DIFFERENTLY THAN SCIENTOLOGY F/Ns.
An F/N seen by the auditor in running R3RA is not called until the full
Dianetic EP is reached.
An auditor running R3RA is not looking for F/Ns. He is looking for the
postulate which is sitting at the bottom of the chain he is running.
The EP of a Dianetic chain is always always always the postulate coming
off. The postulate is what holds the chain in its place. Release the
postulate and the chain blows. That's it.
The auditor must recognize the postulate when the pa gives it, note the
VGIs, call the F/N and end off auditing that chain.
An F/N seen as the incident is erasing is not called.
The pa does not have to state that the incident has erased. Once he has
given up the postulate the erasure has occurred. The auditor will see an
F/N and VGIs. Now the F/N is called. F/Ns are not indicated until the EP of
postulate off, F/N and VGIs is reached.
It's the postulate-not the F/N that we are going for in New Era
Dianetics.
MULTIPLE ILLNESS-means the preclear is physically uncomfortable or ill
from several engrams of different types all restimulated. One runs one
somatic chain at a time, running each new symptom that is assessed or
stated by the preclear.
CHAIN means a series of recordings of similar experiences. A chain has
engrams, secondaries and locks. Example-head injury chain in the sequence
encountered by an auditor and run by R3RA-sporting goods display window
seeing it (lock), losing a bat (secondary), hit in the head with a bat
(engram). The engram is the earliest date, the secondary a later date, the
lock the most recent.
By using somatics to trace back (meaning discomforts, complaints,
sensations, aches, pains) and by staying on the chain of only one somatic
(i.e. headaches) you get back down the single chain without dispersing all
over the place into different chains. Thus one runs the chain of one
particular somatic or discomfort or complaint down to key-out or erasure
before doing the next somatic or discomfort or complaint.
AUTOMATIC BANK-when a pc gets picture after picture after picture all
out of control. This occurs when one isn't following an assessed somatic or
complaint or has chosen the wrong one or one which the pc is not ready to
confront or by overwhelming the pc with rough TRs or going very non-
standard. Some pcs turn up in their first session with automatic banks. The
thing to do is carefully assess the physical complaint for longest or best
read and gently handle that chain well.
BASIC-this is the FIRST experience recorded in mental image pictures of
the TYPE of pain, sensation, discomfort, etc. Every chain has its basic. It
is a PECULIARITY and a FACT that when one gets down to the basic on a chain
(a) the postulate made at the time of the incident comes off and (b) the
whole chain vanishes for good. Basic is simply earliest.
UNBURDENING-as a basic is not at once available on any chain one
usually unburdens it by running later engrams, secondaries and locks. The
act of unburdening would be digging off the top to get at the bottom as in
moving sand. As you run off later incidents, the ability of the preclear to
confront it also increases and basic is easy to run when finally contacted.
BASIC BASIC-this belongs in Scientology. It is wholly beyond the scope
of Dianetics. It means the most basic basic of all basics and results in
clearing. It is found on the Clearing Course. If contacted or run before
the pc was brought up through the Scientology grades, he wouldn't be able
to handle it anyway as experience has shown. So this is part of
Scientology, not Dianetics.
VALENCE is the form and identity of the preclear or another, the
beingness.
ALLY-a person from whom one had sympathy and was dependent upon.
ASSESS in Dianetics means choose, from a list or statements, which item
or thing has the longest read or the pc's interest. The longest read will
also have the pc's interest oddly enough.
If you know these definitions COLD so you don't have to mutter them or
memo
rize them but just KNOW them, you will really get results with Dianetics.
The biggest failure in training auditors was their faulty grasp of what
they were addressing and their additive think.
The discoveries of Dianetics were basic and vital and opened a wide new
unexplored frontier.
These words were assigned to things arbitrarily. They had to be. Man
had not had any notion of these things before so they had no names and had
to be assigned names.
The names were chosen because they didn't also mean something else in
another field of science.
The terms are therefore IMPORTANT and what they mean and the things
they name must be grasped before success can attend any auditing.
Any failures of Dianetic auditors were not the failures of Dianetics.
The persons attempting to audit others didn't KNOW what these things were,
essentially the lock, the secondary, the engram, erasure and key-out.
So these are essential to any training or use of Dianetics.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jc.ei.rd.rb.lfg.nc.kjm
Copyright � 1969. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 APRIL 1969RA
REVISED 20 JULY 1978
Remimeo RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Dn Checksheet
Class VIIIs
(Revisions in this type style)
DIANETIC USE
Ref: New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins, particularly:
HCOB 28 Jul 71 RA New Era Dianetics Series 8R
Rev. 25.6.78 DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
Re-Rev. 22.9.78
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 22 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 2R
NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM
OUTLINE
and HCOB 11 Jul 73RB ASSIST SUMMARY
Rev. 15.7.78
Re-Rev. 21 Sep 78
Why Dianetics fell out of use had nothing to do with its workability.
It has worked and well since 1950.
In some areas, mainly the U.S., it was illegal to heal or cure
anything. There was even a law in California giving 25 illnesses that were
against the law to cure. The "Better" Business Bureau in the U.S. even
issues pamphlets that state that "You can always tell a fake healer because
he says he can cure something."
Why a civilization would make it illegal to cure illness can only be
explained by some vested interest making more money out of people being
sick than getting people well.
There existed a continual threat to anyone who helped their fellows.
The ability of Scientology to bring about spiritual freedom therefore
received the concentration of effort by organizations.
Lately public opinion has turned heavily against these suppressive
groups and the public discovery that illegal seizure, torture and murder
was the hidden activity of political psychiatric groups has lost these
people their support.
It was overlooked that spiritual healing of the body has not been
illegal and that Dianetics used for pastoral counseling is completely
legal.
It is a sobering thought that the only effective technology of
psychosomatic healing-Dianetics-could be suppressed out of full usage.
One is handling the effect of the spirit on the body. Therefore even
Dianetics is spiritual healing and as such is far from illegal.
Man should not be kept ill just to let a few have a monopoly.
In almost all other countries than the U.S. there is no restriction on
healing despite monopolistic efforts to make one.
Another reason Dianetics was for some time out of use was that it was
believed it had been superseded by Scientology which it never was in fact.
Dianetics can be done with no reference whatever to Scientology or its
techniques.
People who have given up through illness are also prone to want to
leave. Instead of confronting their illness it is easier to try to get away
from it. Thus such people are in a hurry to be free and prefer Scientology.
But if they have a sick body, it is a present time problem and inhibits
attaining the spiritual freedom they seek.
The correct procedure is to make them well wherever possible with
medical treatment and to handle their psychosomatic illnesses with
Dianetics and then, before any further abuses by life can occur, to raise
their ability and secure their freedom with Scientology. This is the
correct use of Dianetics. It is the remedy for psychosomatic illness.
The basic use of Dianetics is to make a well body and to augment
physical treatment.
Any injurious experience can be erased by Dianetics. It is very easy to
use and if one wants people well and happy it should be used at every
occasion.
A person has an operation. This should be followed soon after by Touch
Assists and other handlings from the Full Assist Checklist 28 May 1974RA
revised 1I July 1978, including erasure of the engram of the experience by
Narrative R3RA Quad. The engrams and secondaries related to the incident
can then be run using preassessment procedure and R3RA Quad. The healing
time will be greatly speeded and often healing will occur where a relapse
might have followed.
A woman has a child. The engram of delivery should be run out soon
after. The result of doing so is very spectacular. There is no "postpartum
psychosis" or dislike of the child and no permanent injury to the mother.
It is in fact best to audit the mother both before and after the delivery,
which gives one fast relatively painless childbirth and quick recovery.
Recovery from disease under treatment is speeded by Dianetic auditing.
Where the incident of the break is, with any chain, run out, a broken
limb will heal (by X-ray evidence) in two instead of six weeks.
Some patients who are not responding to medical treatment who are then
given as little as a Touch Assist will then be found responsive to the
medical treatment. An auditor giving the person a Dianetic session will
more or less ensure that the medical treatment will now work.
A person who is accident prone when audited usually loses this unwanted
characteristic.
Many "insane" recover from their symptoms when given proper medical
treatment, rest, no harassment and then good mild Dianetic processing. They
become and remain normal people without relapse.
Chronic, which is to say, long-term illnesses cease when audited by
Dianetics and then medical treatment, which was earlier ineffective.
Whole classes of "mentally retarded" children have been made more
normal by teachers in London County Council schools using relatively
unskilled Dianetics.
Tiredness, unwanted sensations, bizarre pains and aches, bad hearing or
sight also routinely respond to Dianetic processing.
The sickness and death rate of persons who are part of Dianetic groups
is only a small fraction of that of other groups.
Pilots audited with Dianetics, by a test involving a whole squadron, went
without a single even minor accident for the following year.
Scientists audited with Dianetics have greatly improved intelligence.
Dianetics raises IQ as a side product to usual auditing, at a rate of about
one point of IQ per hour of processing.
Withered limbs, skin blotches and rashes and even blindness and
deafness have all responded to Dianetics.
Possibly the point which counted most against Dianetics in the early
attacks on it was that it did a vast array of things. The truth was, it
actually did them. When you have the answer to the human mind as in
Dianetics of course anything caused by the mind can be remedied.
It is very much easier to train a Dianetic auditor than a Scientology
auditor. It requires only about a month to make a Dianetic auditor who is
sufficiently conversant with the subject to get results. This too was used
against Dianetics as the psychiatrist of that day claimed he himself needed
twelve years of study to do psychiatry. Of course when the public found out
that the product of these twelve years of study was killing the "insane"
and increasing their number the argument became silly.
The spectacular personal gains which were available in Scientology were
so great they tended to obscure the very real use and value of Dianetics.
Further, a Scientology executive trained and processed beyond the need
of body help tended to forget that much of the public out there first had
to be helped out of their physical misery before they could attempt
anything like personal gain.
You use Dianetics much the way you would use any remedy.
When a fellow is burned you audit out the burn.
When a woman loses a loved one you audit out the loss.
When a young man can't finish his schooling you audit out his unhappy
school experiences.
Dianetics is for USE. There is not a lot of admin about it. It isn't
something you use after bowing down three times to Chicago. You just USE
it.
A Dianetic auditor who sees someone sick and who doesn't get him
treatment and then audit him is just not humane.
Woman going to have a baby-get out the meter and audit her into shape
for it. When she's had it, run out the delivery.
Fellow burns his hand, break out the meter.
Dianetics is the answer to human suffering. USE it.
Ideas build up which halt the use of Dianetics, such as "Once you have
a floating needle on engrams you don't run them anymore." That's silly. The
Dianetic end phenomena is postulate off, F/N and VGIs. This means that the
chain has blown. That full EP can then be called the end of that chain. But
not the end of Dianetics on the case. (Ref: HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF
EQUALS ERASURE.)
I am not trying to make anyone wrong by reintroducing the real use of
Dianetics. I myself had not realized how separate and vital it was as a
technology until recently.
I was engaged for many years researching and completing Scientology. I
had not noticed and had not said that Dianetics must be preserved and used
in all cases of
psychosomatic illness or in physical suffering.
Yet, during all this time when I had to handle illness, I did not use
Scientology. I used good old Dianetics.
Now I have refined it and made a better statement of it and made it
easier to use and I trust it will be used for what it was intended and that
Scientology grades will be relieved of the burden of attempting to heal
physical illness, a use for which it was never designed.
Scientology is a vital practice in itself. It places a person above any
further illness or suffering. But he has to be made well first.
People will ask, "Deafness? Now what special process is needed in
curing deafness.... ?"
This is one of the modern refinements of Dianetics. One runs whatever
is assessed on the preclear. with preclear interest. He doesn't decide to
cure somebody of deafness. He handles the illness or disability the pc
offers up that reads on the meter and has pc interest. Maybe it will be
deafness.
You have one single body of tech covering all cases and that is now New
Era Dianetics and the steps of HCOB 22 June 1978R, New Era Dianetics Series
2R, NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE. The whole of the person's
complaints should eventually vanish if you just keep on going with the Full
Pc Program Outline applying New Era Dianetics standardly and fully
completing each part of the program.
Having gotten the pc well by medical care and Dianetic auditing, then
start out with Scientology. If he gets sick again before many grades,
revert to Dianetics, handle it and then when he is well, resume Scientology
where you left off.
Never run a Scientology grade to make a pc well or cure something. It's
a misapplication.
By using Dianetics as readily as you use shoes you can make and keep
people well. You don't worry about overruns, rudiments or anything else.
You just use R3RA even to correct ARC breaks and PTPs and bad auditing.
By then correctly using Scientology we can make the person a far better
being.
We have had Standard Dianetics for some time. We now have even further
improved Dianetic technology with the New Era Dianetics Series.
We have developed Scientology STANDARD TECH.
Both are now valid as themselves.
They do not cross.
Dianetics for the body.
Scientology for the spirit.
USE BOTH.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.aap.lfg.dr
Copyright � 1969. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 APRIL 1969R
Remimeo Issue II
Dn Checksheet REVISED 20 JULY 1978
Class Vials
Qual Secs (Revisions in this type style)
Tech Secs
DIANETIC RESULTS
Every once in a while you get a Scientology result while running
Dianetics. Also, sometimes you get a Dianetic result while auditing
Scientology.
This tends to keep the two distinctly different subjects confused with
each other.
A preclear. after Dianetic auditing, tells the Examiner he is exterior
and feeling fantastically bright. This is a Scientology result.
Sometimes a Scientology preclear after attaining a grade will state
that it has healed his terror stomach. This is a Dianetic result.
There is nothing whatever wrong with this except that it gives an
auditor an invitation to confuse the subjects and think they are the same.
The clue is CONSISTENCY.
Dianetics only rarely exteriorizes a preclear.
Scientology only occasionally handles a terror stomach. In fact a
person whose terror stomach wasn't handled by Dianetics and its R3RA can go
all the way to OT VI sometimes with it. He doesn't get rid of the terror
stomach and he doesn't (since he had a present time problem all the way)
make OT VI either.
If it is a body pain, sensation, somatic, illness, disability, the
subject to use is Dianetics.
If it is a gain in ability and beingness that is the purpose, the
subject to use is Scientology.
After many years of handling cases this emerged as a very factual fact.
Dianetics is Dianetics, Scientology is Scientology. If you mix them they
attain limited results.
This is so true that when you use all the prohibitives and never nevers
of Scientology in doing Dianetics, Dianetics also fails.
See these two subjects as clearly separate. They each have their own
case supervision orders. You don't use Scientology case supervision orders
in case supervising Dianetics. And you don't use the Dianetic rules on
Scientology.
One addresses the body, the other the thetan. They both go by their own
rules.
There is also NEW ERA DIANETICS the rules of which are rigidly adhered
to, so Dianetics is not a Scientology downgrade either.
Dianetic results are a well body and a being happy with it.
Scientology results are a free, powerful and immortal being.
They can and do achieve their proper end results but only when used
properly, separately and as themselves.
LRH:ja.ei.rd lfg L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 APRIL 1969R
REVISED 11 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Dianetics Checksheet
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
SOMATICS
Note: This Bulletin has been revised to align with
New Era Dianetics Series tech. See:
HCOB 24 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 5
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
HCOB 18 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 26 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 6
Issue II ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
All chains are held together by one similar AWARENESS. That is a new
discovery. Chains are not held together by narratives or personnel or
locations. They are held together by AWARENESSES. Thus when running R3RA
(not Narrative R3RA) we ASK FOR AND FOLLOW DOWN ONLY AWARENESSES CONTAINED
IN THE PREASSESSMENT LIST....
There are a thousand different descriptive words that could add up to
an awareness. Pains, aches, dizziness, sadness, these are all awarenesses.
Awareness, pleasant or unpleasant, of a thetan plus body is what we are
trying to run in Dianetics.
This brings to light a further discovery. One never assesses medical
terms or symptoms.
An engram contains pain and unconsciousness. All right. Then its basic
would be a physical duress not a symptom resulting from that duress.
Example: The pc says "headache." You assess headache, you try to run
"headaches" and all you ever get is times a pc had a headache. Well, the
headache is a symptom caused by a head injury. The engram must have
contained a shot in the head or a crushed skull or some actual injury. The
word "headache" would describe only how the head feels later when the
engram occasionally goes into restimulation.
So you would get only locks and secondaries to audit and only by chance
and an alteration by the pc of the command to find an earlier headache
would you ever get to an engram in which the head was crushed or injured.
"Headache" is the result of a head injury, and it doesn't describe the
injury which, in engram form, is now giving the pc headaches.
Take the medical term arthritis. You could ask for arthritis and get
only visits to the doctor or times in a wheel chair. The physical injury
contained in the engram causing the arthritis is not described.
Alcoholism would present the same problem. If the pc listed and the
auditor assessed "alcoholism" we would only get times when he was drunk,
not the engram causing the symptom which might contain "Feeling very dry."
Therefore we have the preassessment procedure of New Era Dianetics.
After getting from the pa the original item (the drug, alcohol, condition,
illness, etc.) to be handled, we preassess to get the AWARENESSES connected
to it.
... And we will land the real engram every time, not only its locks or
secondaries. (It is quite all right to run locks and secondaries as it is
necessary to unburden the chain and increase the pc's confront, but chains
always end up in a basic engram at the bottom and if you don't get and
erase that then the chain will key in again.)
In asking for list items one puts down only what the pc says. That's an
invariable rule. But when the pc says some... symptom like "headache" or
medical term like "arthritis" the auditor writes it down; if it reads and
has pa interest he first runs it Narrative to full EP (Narrative R3RA
Quad); THEN he does a preassessment on arthritis to get all the somatics
connected with the item.
Example: Pc says... complaint is "SINUSITIS." The auditor writes it
down, and if it has read and pc is interested he runs it Narrative R3RA
Quad. He then does a preassessment on it, lists from the preassessment item
found and ends up with a running item "A burning sensation in the nose,"
and runs it R3RA Quad to full EP. Sinusitis can of course be preassessed
many times and the items run.
If the auditor took and assessed only "SINUSITIS" and then asked for
incidents of sinusitis he would get only locks and secondaries-times when
the engram was in restimulation. And he would rarely get the real basic and
engram that causes the symptom.
This discovery opens the door to swift "cures." But one is obviously
not treating SINUSITIS. He is looking for an incident in which there was a
"burning sensation in the nose." And after a few locks and upper engrams
he'd find and run the real injury in which the nose was burned.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jc.ldm.ei.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1969. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 APRIL 1969R
REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
New Era
Dianetics (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheet
HIGH TA IN DIANETICS
In Scientology a high TA is always an overrun.
In Dianetics it means AN ENGRAM TOO LATE ON THE CHAIN TO ERASE IS IN
RESTIMULATION.
A Scientology auditor "rehabs" overruns.
A Dianetic auditor cures high TA by finding what engram (lock or
secondary) is in restimulation (active). This will show up as a PAIN,
SENSATION, MISEMOTION OR OTHER PRESENT TIME FEELING the pc has. In short,
just by finding the somatic by list and assessing for longest read and
running R3RA you can cure a high TA.
You handle a TA that goes up during a session by completing the chain
exactly as in R3RA.
The same action you do for R3RA also cures the high TA.
By running a pa on an incident late on the chain without going earlier
you drive the TA high.
By ending off before the pc has given the postulate he made at the time
of the incident (hence not getting a complete erasure), you can leave the
picture partially there and capable of affecting the pc.
There can be an infinity of wrong ways but only one right way and the
right way is R3RA by the book.
A high TA (4 or above) is simply the E-Meter's reaction to increased
mass. Mental image pictures have mass. The mass has what is called
resistance to electricity. The E-Meter measures electrical resistance. Mass
resists electricity. Thus in the presence of mental mass as contained in
mental image pictures, the tone arm of the E-Meter rises.
When you restimulate an engram, the E-Meter current flow has more
trouble getting through the pc and the TA rises.
When the engram (or lock or secondary) is "keyed-out" (moved away) the
TA comes down and the meter needle will float.
If you find a long chain with many engrams on it and run a late engram
the TA goes up. As you go earlier, and eventually find basic, the TA comes
down and when you get the postulate and erase the basic engram the TA will
come down to between 2 and 3 and the needle will float.
Old disproved theory pre-Dianetics was that the E-Meter reacted to
sweat on the hands but of course a person would have to sweat and "unsweat"
to make the meter behave as it does. And the idea of "unsweating" would be
ridiculous. Palms of the hand do not go wet-dry with enough rapidity to
account for meter reaction up and down.
When you run several engrams through once or several somatic chains without
erasing any you pile up too much mass and the TA will go high and stick.
Even if nothing is done to repair this the pc will destimulate (the
pictures will drop away) in from 3 to 10 days.
It is a very poor show of auditing to do R3RA other than exactly by the
book. It is very easy to do it exactly right. The drill is simple. If done
exactly right the result is good and invariable.
LRH:cic.rd.kjm L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1969R
Remimeo Issue V
Dianetic Course REVISED 15 JULY 1977
(Revision of HCO Bulletin of 21 October 1968R.
For use on Dianetic Course only.)
(Deletes reference to needle "R/Sing" before an F/N.)
FLOATING NEEDLE
A floating needle is the idle uninfluenced movement of the needle on
the dial without any patterns or reactions in it. It can be as small as 1"
or as large as dial wide. It does not fall or drop to the right of the
dial. It moves to the left at the same speed as it moves to the right. It
is observed on a Mark V E-Meter calibrated with the TA between 2.0 and 3.0
with GIs in on the pc. It can occur after a cognition blowdown of the TA or
just moves into floating. The pc may or may not voice the cognition.
It, by the nature of the E-Meter reading below the awareness of the
thetan occurs just before the pc is aware of it. So to give a "That's it"
on the occurrence of the F/N can prevent the pa from getting the cognition.
Pcs and pre-OTs OFTEN signal an F/N with a "POP" to the left and the
needle can actually even describe a pattern much like a rock slam. Meters
with lighter movement do "pop" to the left.
One does not sit and study and be sure of an "F/N." It swings or pops,
he lets the pc cognite and then indicates the F/N to the pc preventing
overrun.
A one-hand electrode sometimes obscures an F/N and gives false TA. If
used, use higher sensitivity and get the TA from 2 cans when needed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JE:cs.lf Revised by
Copyright � 1969. 1977 CS-4/5
by L. Ron Hubbard As ordered by
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MAY 1969
REISSUED 23 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
IMPORTANT STUDY DATA
NUMBER OF TIMES OVER THE MATERIAL EQUALS CERTAINTY AND RESULTS.
RESULTS IN THE STUDENT'S OWN CASE IS A GUARANTEE OF SUCCESSFUL
APPLICATION BY THE STUDENT.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1969, 1977
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MAY 1969R
Issue II
REVISED 31 MARCH 1977
(Revision in this type style)
Remimeo
Dianetics Course
TEACHING THE DIANETICS COURSE
As the teaching of basic data restimulates confusions which are then
dramatized by throwing the course off line, the teaching of the Dianetics
Course as follows is hugely vital.
The teaching of Dianetics auditors is laid down on these simple
principles.
1. The data on tapes and bulletins is studied without alter-is,
interpretation or addition by the student, fellow student, instructor
or supervisor.
2. Well done and other folders are studied by the individual student.
3. No lecturing or additional interpretation or evaluation by
supervisors.
4. The student audits only when he has completely passed on 1. and 2.
above. He must not audit before he has completed his checksheet once
through.
5. Things the student is weak on are done in clay.
6. The student is sent to Cramming at his own expense for bad auditing
goofs. He may also be taken off auditing and made to do his checksheet
again.
7. Any student question is answered by referring to the HCOB, folder or
tape or by explaining it is beyond the scope of Dianetic auditing.
8. A rigid invariable schedule is precisely adhered to.
9. Checksheets and tapes and folders are gone through in the sequence
laid down by the checksheet and not randomly out of sequence.
If this is made difficult then the programme must be cut back to the
bare bones of the original above.
The teaching of standard tech must also be standard. Therefore the
above MUST
be adhered to completely.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
Rick Sheehy,
FMO 1709 I/C
LRH:RS:jp.an.nt
Copyright � 1969, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MAY 1969RA
REVISED 25 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
NED Grad
Checksheet
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
CASE SUPERVISING
NEW ERA DIANETICS FOLDERS
All a Case Supervisor looks for in Dianetics folders to advise the next
action is departure from exact New Era Dianetics procedure.
It is a very easy job providing the Case Supervisor knows his New Era
Dianetics exactly and completely.
Any time there is the most minute or flagrant departure from exact
assessment or exact R3RA, there will be a breakdown of the results.
It is quite a tribute to the tech that this is true. And it is true.
Doing C/Sing recently on a very great many Dianetic cases audited by
relatively untrained auditors the following emerged in letters ten feet
high.
1. Where the auditor followed the exact procedure without deviation the
results were uniformly excellent.
2. Where the auditor deviated from the exact procedure the results were
poor or bad.
There are many, many ways an auditor can deviate from exact procedure.
There is only one exact procedure.
As a result of doing this C/S work, I would, if I were doing Dianetic
C/Sing, refuse to let an auditor audit until he could attest with absolute
certainty to each point of the Student Attest on the Hubbard New Era
Dianetics Course Checksheet. This would save nearly all work required of a
Case Supervisor.
When the auditor is in a fumbly state regarding the procedure and has
not drilled it until he could do it with the house caving in, the preclear
does not get good results. That is really all there is to it.
If the auditor simply observes the Auditor's Code, handles TRs and the
meter fairly well and does the assessments and R3RA exactly as laid out,
the results will be found to be astonishingly good, even miraculous.
__________
To correct a bad session the normal action of the C/S is to order the
offbeat actions done correctly.
EXAMPLE
A. Auditor assessed by interest only, not by read and the session bogged
down. C/S action-reassess by longest read.
B. Medical terms were put on the running item list; one was chosen and
case bogged. C/S action, order such be taken off list and proper
preassessment procedure applied to it to get running items.
C. A basic was found and auditor told it was erasing but sent pc earlier
but pc could find nothing so left it. C/S orders the last incident
found fully erased.
D. Auditor tells pc he won't run it because it "isn't an engram." C/S
action, order auditor to retrain on Auditor's Code and do Invalidation
and Evaluation in clay. Orders pc to a Scientology auditor, Green Form.
E. Pc very nattery to auditor. C/S orders pc to Scientology auditor,
"and be sure to pull all withholds."
F. C/S finds his orders to complete a chain left undone with a high TA
were not done-folder mislaid or pc not routed. Pc has become ill. Order
the pc to medical treatment and the chain completed and the auditor to
Ethics.
You see how it is. Each time the auditor violated normal simple
procedure, the C/S orders that the normal simple procedure be completed
either by first giving pc a Scientology Green Form and then completing the
New Era Dianetics action or, omitting GF (when pc not out rud), just
getting the real standard action done.
This is really all there is to case supervising New Era Dianetics case
folders. The more you try to do something else than the above the further
the case will go wrong.
The Hubbard New Era Dianetics auditor does not have to know how to do
Green Forms or rudiments. When they have to be done you get a Scientology
auditor to do them.
It is a serious error to mix up Dianetics and Scientology.
The potential errors of out ruds and all the rest are present of course
in any New Era Dianetics session, but do not usually happen when exact New
Era Dianetics procedure is used. When they do happen you send the pc to a
Scientology auditor.
This is case supervision, New Era Dianetics. It has been fully worked
out by my case supervising a great many Dianetic sessions to launch this
new view of Dianetics. And the above is what I found.
It drives home also the necessity of training New Era Dianetics
auditors as precision technologists and the risk of letting people audit
before they are fully grooved in on exactly what's done in a New Era
Dianetics session.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cs.rd.lfg.kjm
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 MAY 1969R
REVISED 8 JULY 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
All Orgs
Exec Secs
Tech Sec (Replaces HCOB of 27 July 1966
All Tech Hats same name.)
All Qual Hats
Dianetic Course (Tech Div) (Qual Div)
METER TRIM CHECK
E-Meters can go out of trim during a session because of temperature
changes.
Thus even if the meter is properly calibrated and reads at 2.0 with a
5,000 ohm resistor across the leads and 3.0 with 12,500 ohms, by the end of
the session a pc can be apparently reading below 2.0 because the meter is
off trim.
The following meter procedure is therefore to be followed AT THE END OF
EACH SESSION (AFTER GIVING "END OF SESSION."):
1. DON'T MOVE THE TRIM KNOB
2. PULL OUT THE JACK PLUG
3. MOVE THE TA UNTIL THE NEEDLE IS ON 'SET' AT THE SENSITIVITY YOU WERE
USING IN THE SESSION
4. RECORD THE TA POSITION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE AUDITOR'S REPORT FORM AS:
"Trim check - TA =...."
5. IF YOUR METER IS KNOWN TO BE OUT OF CALIBRATION (as in para 2 above)
RECORD ALSO: "Calibration error - on meter = 2.0 actual" at the bottom
of the form.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lb-r.cs.an.ei.cden.nc
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MAY 1969R
REVISED 3 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo
Dianetic (Revisions in this type style)
Auditors (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Dianetic
C/Ses
(This Bulletin has been revised to align with New Era Dianetics
tech. Data on running narrative incidents has been deleted.
This is now covered by HCOB 26 Jun 78 Issue II, New Era
Dianetics Series 6, URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS.)
ERASURE
Now and then a pc does not understand that he is supposed to be erasing
a PICTURE and only goes far enough to erase the somatic. Auditor says, "Is
it erasing?" Pc can't feel somatic so he says, "It's gone." Auditor puzzled
by no full end phenomena but buys it.
What you want to know as an auditor is "Is the picture erasing?" You
can use that line to check, but not habitually.
Erasure depends... on the pc getting to the BEGINNING of the incident.
Sometimes the pc keeps starting a bit late in the incident and so does not
get an erasure.
If you assess an item like "Dizziness after an operation" and try to
run it the pc will bog utterly as the whole operation precedes the somatic
called for and not only won't erase but also won't show as a picture. (Ref:
HCOB 20 Jul 78 New Era Dianetics Series 18 AFTER THE FACT ITEMS)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1969R
REVISED 11 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Dn Chksht (Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
AUDITING OUT SESSIONS
NARRATIVE VERSUS SOMATIC CHAINS
(Ref: New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins.)
Now and then it is necessary to audit out the last session or an
auditing session.
One does this by using Narrative R3RA... wording when asking the pc to
go earlier. One asks for an EARLIER SIMILAR INCIDENT. "Is there an earlier
similar incident?" A session, when audited, does not always erase. Instead
it has become part of a chain. Therefore one has to run Narrative R3RA on
it and get an earlier similar incident.
The chain may go back vast amounts of time.
Whereas the pc may only have been in Scientology 3 days, before
Scientology there were other types of "sessions" such as psychoanalysis.
And before that, in Rome and Greece, dream therapy in which one was
"visited by a god." And before that-well, the chain can have a very far
back basic. One does not of course suggest ever what the earlier incident
may be. There is no telling what the pc may confuse with a session.
If one asked the pc to "locate an earlier incident with a similar
feeling" one would be on another chain entirely. Hence one asks, simply,
"Is there an earlier similar incident?" when running a session out.
Running a session out has the liability that one is running a NARRATIVE
CHAIN, a similar experience rather than a similar somatic.
One of the major 1969 breakthroughs was that chains are held together
mainly by somatics. The body condition or somatic is what keeps the chain
in association.
One does of course run "narrative incidents" by which one means similar
EXPERIENCES. (See HCOB 25 June 78, New Era Dianetics Series 8, DIANETICS,
BEGINNING A PC ON.) "Locate an earlier time your mother spanked you."
"Locate an earlier wreck." These will run and erase but they must be done
properly. This is by running the incident over and over to erasure, asking
after each run through for earlier beginning, and only going earlier
similar if it starts to grind badly. Running only narrative incidents is
what made early Dianetics run up such fabulous numbers of hours in
processing.
The commands for running narrative incidents and further data on
running narratives are to be found in HCOB 26 June 1978 Issue II, New Era
Dianetics Series 6, ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS.
Somatic chains go quickly to basic and are the important chains.
Thus when we erase a chain of sessions we sometimes run into a very
long session. Sometimes the TA goes up to 4 or 5 (particularly if the
auditor grinds). Using a wrong go-earlier command is a primary reason for
trouble.
Usually if you ask simply for an earlier beginning or an earlier
similar incident the pc goes back to something that will erase and it
blows.
But remember, asking for similar types of experience can... get very
long and erasure may not occur for some time.
Running out sessions can be a worthwhile action,... but the best thing
to do is goof no assessments or sessions in the first place.
LRH:an.rd.ldv L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 MAY 1969RA
Remimeo REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Dianetic RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
Checksheet
(Revisions in this type style)
HOW NOT TO ERASE
(Reference: New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins and
HCOB 16 Sept 1978, POSTULATE OFF
EQUALS ERASURE)
There are two extremes a Dianetic student can go to on the subject of
erasure.
A. He can grind and grind and grind (DEF, DEF, DEF, DEF, on and
on) with the TA going up, up, up and never once tell the pc to go
earlier.
B. He can watch the TA come down to between 2 and 3 and go loose
on the last incident run, ask the pc "erase or solid," get a
noncommittal answer and send the pc earlier. He can keep sending
the pc earlier and earlier on another chain without ever noticing
he's finished the first chain.
These are the two extreme cases. In Case A it is OBVIOUS from TA rise
that the chain has an earlier incident or the incident being run has an
earlier beginning. In Case B it is obvious from the TA that the chain
erased.
In A the student is preventing the pc from going earlier when he
should.
In B the student is forcing the pc to go earlier when he shouldn't.
In both cases the student hasn't a clue of what an engram chain is.
It is marvelous how students demand "the exact phrase" to use as an
effort to avoid having to really understand what they are doing in
auditing.
If a student hasn't a clue about what he is doing then a thousand goofy
outnesses will keep cropping up, each one requiring (a supervisor thinks) a
special instruction. After a while you get a course text weighing one ton,
and all because the student didn't grab the basic definitions in the first
place.
A student who will do either A or B above has not grasped the most
basic facts concerning erasure.
1. An engram chain is held in place by the basic for that chain
and the postulate made at the time of that incident.
2. The basic is the FIRST TIME.
3. The clue to erasure is unburdening down to the first time and
getting the postulate made at the time of the incident.
4. That all picture chains are there because the first time and
the postulate made at that time are there.
The student assumes one ALWAYS asks "solid or erasing." Or that one
always does only what the pa says. Or some such consideration.
I would damned well never ask "solid or erasing" if I saw the TA start
to climb. I would know the TA measured mental mass and that it was
accumulating and wouldn't erase. I would immediately send the pa earlier as
soon as he had completed his pass through the incident.
Honest, it's awful easy.
A very odd outness a student will encounter when he is so dedicated to the
exact words is the fast pc who erases before he can tell about it. Along
about No. 3 of R3RA the TA blows down and the needle F/Ns.
A student who knew his business by understanding would ask, "Did it
erase?" of course. The pc would say, "It vanished," and VGIs would come in.
A fast running pc on a light chain can occasionally blow an engram by
inspection. If it was basic for that chain, one would be committing the
crime described in B above. The pc is likely to go into another chain or a
heavy protest.
So you see, there's no substitution for actually understanding what's
going on.
There's the pc, there's the bank, there's the meter needle, there's the
meter tone arm and there's the auditor, there's the procedure, there's the
report. That's all the parts there are to a session.
When one understands each one, one can audit. When one doesn't
understand some part of any of the above, he will require unusual
solutions.
Anything truly powerful is truly simple.
So a student who goofs is being complex and hasn't understood something
about one of the major parts named above.
I just saw a goofed-up session that went like this:
Pc: It (the engram) happened every day for three days.
Auditor: DEF.
Flunk. The auditor was so deficient in knowing about chains and first
time that he didn't tell the pc to go to the first day's engram but let the
poor pc flounder in day 3! And so the chain did not erase and the pc hung
up in it.
If the rule of first time is really understood, one would realize a lot
of things, even that the pc was beginning an incident halfway through it
and hadn't begun to run the beginning of it so of course, no erasure. If
this happened on basic" There's no earlier incident" (TA high).
"Is there an earlier beginning to this incident?"
"Hey, yes there is."
"Go to the new beginning of that incident and tell me when you are
there."
Yoicks, an erasure!
This is no invitation to depart from procedure. It's an invitation to
see procedure as an action, very precise, capable of being understood and
done, not a rote chant.
I'm sure some students are ex-medicine men who did their spells with
exactly worded chants. It's time they understood the brew in the pot!
That's the procedure-not do the commands rhyme!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:an.ei.rd.lfg.nc.kjm
Copyright t 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JUNE 1969RA
REVISED 26 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Class VIII
Checksheet
Dianetics (Revisions in this type style)
Grad (Ellipses Indicate deletions)
Checksheet
C/S
HOW TO CASE SUPERVISE
DIANETICS FOLDERS
It is very easy to case supervise a New Era Dianetics folder and pcs
being handled by New Era Dianetics.
The full program to follow is covered in New Era Dianetics Series 2R
HCOB 22 June 78R, NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE. One just
follows it!
There is very little to New Era Dianetics C/S work.
The Case Supervisor MUST be a Hubbard New Era Dianetics Graduate. There
is no substitute for that. One who isn't would hopelessly snarl up real New
Era Dianetics auditors or students aspiring to that cert.
The New Era Dianetics C/S should really be a New Era Dianetics Graduate
and a Class VIII. Even so he has to keep these techs completely separate.
One NEVER asks a New Era Dianetics auditor in a Dianetic session to do
anything except New Era Dianetics. There are no other actions.
The C/S, in correcting an auditor should do it positively and refer to
the Dianetic HCOB. Negative criticism I have found, undermines auditors.
One can as easily say the same thing in a positive way. Instead of "You
broke the Auditor's Code" one can as easily say "Pcs must be rested before
session. See Auditor's Code."
One NEVER gets inventive in doing a New Era Dianetics C/S. It is all
very straightforward.
The C/S point of view in New Era Dianetics C/Sing is that one is trying
to get New Era Dianetics done. One isn't, in New Era Dianetics C/Sing,
torturously laboring to solve some difficult case.
Therefore there are only four possible actions for a New Era Dianetics
C/S to take:
A. THE CASE THAT MAKES GAINS IS GIVEN MORE NEW ERA DIANETICS.
B. THE CASE THAT HAS HAD ALL POSSIBLE NEW ERA DIANETICS GAIN (and
that is considerable) IS SENT ON TO SCIENTOLOGY.
C. THE CASE THAT MAKES NO GAIN DUE TO CASE "ODDITY" IS SENT TO A
SCIENTOLOGY AUDITOR.
D. THE SESSION THAT IS NON-STANDARD IN AUDITING REQUIRES THE PC BE
SENT TO A SCIENTOLOGY AUDITOR.
It is the fantastic fact that the pc will ONLY get Dianetic wins when
receiving standard New Era Dianetics. Non-standardness only once in a
hundred will give a case gain and that is a fluke. The Case Supervisor must
have good subjective and objective reality on this fact. He must therefore
be the ultimate in dictatorial martinet precision in requiring standard
auditing and assigning standard C/Ses.
There are two types of cases only that come up.
1. The case as in A above who just goes on getting wins.
2. The case (who in life is usually chronically ill even if "up
and about") that requires a C/S to play adept Scientology auditing
against New Era Dianetics auditing. Such a case is "solved" by now
being sent to a Scientology auditor, now being sent to Dianetics,
back and forth.
In D above, the pc who gets a non-standard session and is bogged at the
Examiner's is simply given a Scientology Green Form to F/N. He/she is then
returned to New Era Dianetics auditing. This is a very usual, easy action.
In C above, the "oddity" case is easily recognizable in the folder. The
oddity consists mainly of getting New Era Dianetics auditing, getting sick.
Or in getting auditing but not being able to follow good standard commands.
Such a case also has a history of being ill. This case also can't make
any real headway in study and messes up pcs as an auditor and can't seem to
do standard auditing.
This C case, at first glance, seems to be hopelessly difficult and
invites many to squirrel.
The case is more prevalent than one would think. It runs as high as
50�70 of voluntary pcs.
It could run much higher in the wog world. One spots the case ONLY BY
THE CASE'S REACTION TO GOOD New Era Dianetics auditing, not by any opinion
or test.
But this case isn't any real challenge to the C/S or Scientology
auditor.
Underlying all this illness and inability to concentrate or study or
audit or hold case gains there is a heavily burdened chain that makes
things seem very different than they are.
There is no trick to resolving the C case.
The C/S, having seen that the person roller-coasters after New Era
Dianetics auditing, or can't study or can't audit, orders the person to a
Scientology session for:
"GF to F/N. "Assess ExGF 40RD and handle."
The Scientology auditor in Review does this. ExGF 40RD is the "7
Resistive Cases."
Then the C/S sends the pc back to New Era Dianetics auditing for
routine assessments and R3RA.
It is a saddening event to a C/S when the Scientology auditor lets him
down. So an accomplished Class VIII on that spot is worth his weight in
blessings. Lucky is the C/S who has a fine Class VIII. When he doesn't have
he orders only one action done between C/Ses and watches like a hawk.
Reviewing reviews is a horrible waste of time, even though it has to be
done when necessary.
This C type pc will now sail along for awhile in New Era Dianetics. But
don't be amazed to have the pc roller-coaster again.
When the C type pc does you simply order again a Scientology session
and GF to F/N and ExGF 40 RD and handle. And it will all come out
differently this time. And then the pc is sent back for more New Era
Dianetics.
This is what is meant by interplaying New Era Dianetics with
Scientology reviews for a C type case.
You will just be amazed at the eventual result in the pc. Really a
cracked case, man!
Very sick pcs are sent directly to a medico of course. And New Era
Dianetics auditing is given along with medical treatment to get the pc off
stuck points. This is all covered in HCOBs on medical uses of Dianetics and
includes Touch Assists.
The "insane" pc is given absolute rest, a secure environment and any
needful medical treatment (but never shock or surgery of the brain or
nerves, of course, since that's only depersonalization treatment).
When in better physical health the "insane" pc is given just routine
New Era Dianetics. But the sessions must be flubless and thoroughly within
the Auditor's Code as the "insane" can't stand up to any goofs or
overwhelm.
These "insane" pcs are most often simple cases of medically ill people-
gallstones, malnutrition, deficiencies in certain vitamins, broken backs-
the usual.
To undertake to audit an "insane" pc to sanity without complete
attention to the above paragraphs is adventurous in our experience. But
with these things given attention, the "insane" pc often responds
amazingly. But do not be surprised to find that the "insane" pc turns into
a C type as he comes up the scale.
The main trouble with the "insane" is that too many people around them
are completely devoted to making them even more insane and they almost
never respond to any treatment, medical or Dianetic, while kept in their
same environment associating with the same people.
Also we could say that "Hell hath no fury to match that of a cured
psychotic's associates." Usually the real crazy one is an associate, not
the "insane" one.
C/S PROCEDURE
In doing a C/S on a New Era Dianetics folder, I usually inspect the
following in the following order:
1. The Examiner's Report to see if the pc thought it was okay and
if the Examiner's TA, needle and indicator observation is all
right.
2. The presession C/S to see what was previously ordered done.
3. The session to see if the C/S was done.
4. The 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 sequence and A-EYE to see if it
is standard. I seldom read text if the session was okay at
Examiner's unless the session did not go well.
5. The F/N,... postulate and GIs or VGIs (erasure of the chain)
and GIs at session end.
If all that is okay I give it a "well done."
If it isn't all okay I look for the 1, 2, 3 etc. that was not followed by
an ABC but by a new 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. instead.
I try to find where the session went off standard and point out the
standard actions that should have been done.
If the pc came out of it okay, I order more New Era Dianetics auditing.
If the pc didn't, I send the pc to a Scientology auditor.
If it had lots of DEFs and ground to a high TA session end I check to
see if the auditor asked for an earlier beginning.
If the Dianetics folder is getting fat and the session was unsuccessful
I look for a possible C type pc and handle accordingly.
If the pc is reported ill, I order medical, an assist and treat the pc
thereafter as a C type.
The value of a C/S, whether New Era Dianetics or Scientology, depends
on his unfailing adherence to standard actions.
A C/S that dreams things up to try to "solve a case" by squirrel
processes is worse than no Case Supervisor at all.
The gain of cases depends on the standard, unswerving adherence to New
Era Dianetics, to C/Sing in complete standardness and a Scientology auditor
who really is a flawless standard tech man.
The result is the result of a TEAM. To that team one also adds the
admin team of the rest of the group doing their jobs.
Given all that, one can straighten up whole population areas and
activities and get the job done on the goal lines of well and happy human
beings and a well and happy society both with greatly increased survival
potential.
C/Sing is a happy job itself. And blessed is a C/S who has good
standard New Era Dianetics auditors and good Scientology auditors on his
lines and a good New Era Dianetics Course Supervisor making new good New
Era Dianetics auditors and a good AO somewhere making good new VIIIs, all
backed with orgs whose staffs know their Org Exec Course and policy.
The C/S's job only becomes unhappy and impossible when the auditors are
nonstandard or the admin people never heard of lines or policy and he
himself departs from the straight and narrow of New Era Dianetics and
standard tech.
The purpose of New Era Dianetics can be accomplished smoothly and
easily only if the above are taken into account.
These C/S data are as thoroughly researched in practical application of
tech itself and are derived from hard won practical experience.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.cs.lfg.kjm
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1969RB
REVISED 11 JULY 1978
Remimeo RE-REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
Dn Course
HDG Course
(See also HCOB 31 March 1970
Urgent - Dianetic TR Note)
(Revisions in this type style)
NEW ERA DIANETICS COMMAND TRAINING DRILLS
Upon a recent investigation it was found that the Dianetic Training
Drills (101, 102, 103 & 104) as originally developed by me in 1969 had been
dropped from use on the Dianetics Course.
Therefore, these drills are reissued here for full use, and the
following list of HCOBs and BTBs is hereby cancelled.
BTB 10 DECEMBER 1974 ISSUE VI CANCELLATION OF BULLETINS 1969 cancels
BTB 17 July 1969 Dianetic Command Training Drills 101 & 102, it also
cancels BTB 21 August 1969 TR 104 Note-these cancellations are correct.
Additionally the following BTBs are now cancelled:
BTB 17 July 1969R Revised 19 Feb 1974, Reissued 3 December 1976 cancels
& revises HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1969 Dianetic Command Training Drills
101 & 102.
BTB 20 May 1970 (Issued 28 March 1974 as BTB) cancels HCO BULLETIN OF
20 MAY 1970 (cancels HCOB 21 Aug 1969 and 15 Jan 1970 and 31 March
1970).
NOTE: HCOB 20 May 1970 "103, 104 RUNDOWN" remains cancelled.
HCOB 21 Aug 1969 "TR 104 NOTE" remains cancelled.
HCOB 15 Jan 1970 Issue III "TR 104" remains cancelled.
HCOB 31 March 1970 "URGENT - DIANETIC TR NOTE" is not cancelled. This
HCOB was issued by myself.
TRs 101, 102, 103 & 104
The most common errors being made by student auditors are forgetting
the commands during session and misusing command sequence or procedure or
doing odd things because they get nervous. The following drills are added
to the New Era Dianetics Course to handle this. The drills must be
thoroughly done.
TR 100 AND TR 100-A
Preassessment is a vital step of the New Era Dianetics procedure.
The benefits available from New Era Dianetics require that the auditor
be able to do faultless preassessments of original items from New Era
Dianetics assessment sheets and rundowns.
TR 100 and TR 100-A are made part of the New Era Dianetics Course to
ensure that the student can apply the preassessment procedure in... TR 104
and in his auditing.
TR 100:
NAME: Preassessment Procedure On A Doll
COMMANDS: All commands of the procedure per New Era Dianetics Series 4,
"Assessment and How to Get The Item," and New Era Dianetics
Series 4-1, "The Preassessment List."
POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and the Preassessment
List. In the chair opposite the student is a doll, occupying
the position of the pc.
PURPOSE: To familiarize the student with the delivery and use of the
Preassess ment List.
TRAINING This drill is not coached. The student sets up the E-Meter and
Preasses
STRESS: sment List exactly as in a session. He starts the assessment
and
delivers a complete preassessment on the doll, keeping full admin and
using all standard procedures of NED Series 4 to get items for
running.
Student uses nonsense terms or harmless ones for the original item.
He then delivers a preassessment on that.
Student then selects the preassessment item from the Preassessment
List and asks:
"What ______(preassessment item) are connected with (the original
item)?"
The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with
good assessment TRs, correct procedure and commands, without
comm lags or confusion, and can maintain proper assessment
admin.
TR 100-A
NAME: Preassessing A Doll Coached
COMMANDS: Same as TR 100
POSITION: Same as TR 100, with coach holding the E-Meter cans, and seated
beside the student. Coach provides nonsense and harmless
items for the student and squeezes the can to simulate E-
Meter reads.
PURPOSE: To train the student to deliver and use the preassessment
procedure.
TRAINING Coach provides a list of original items as from one of the New
Era
STRESS: Dianetics rundowns or assessment sheets. The student must
choose
the best reading original item and deliver the Preassessment List to
the doll on that item. All reads on the preassessment must be cor
rectly noted and marked. Student must then select out the correct
preassessment item to list for a running item and ask the correct
question.
As the coach gives running items the student must get these down
accurately with their reads. Then he must select which he
would run on R3RA Quad and in what order.
The student must reassess and extend the list of running items and
use Suppress and Invalidate buttons as needed until the list
is exhausted.
The student must then reassess the Preassessment List, find
the next preassessment item and handle.
Flunks are given for any out TRs on the doll, any incorrectly
marked reads, any missed or altered item given and any
incorrect selection of an item.
Stress is on the student's ability to make a distinction
between an item which requires a preassessment and one that
does not. Student must not try to run drugs, medicines,
medical terms or multiple somatics.
Drill is passed when the student can do the full
preassessment procedure with good TRs, proper commands,
without comm lags or confusions, can maintain proper
assessment admin.
TR 101
NAME: R3RA To A Wall
COMMANDS: R3RA commands including earlier incident and earlier similar
commands.
Included in this drilling are the handling of bouncers, checking for
erasure, and checking for postulate command actions, as well
as are the handling of narrative incident commands.
POSITION: Student seated facing a wall.
PURPOSE: To get the student able to give all R3RA commands accurately,
in correct order without hesitation or having to think what
the next command should be.
TRAINING This drill is not coached. The student sits facing a wall with
a copy
STRESS: of the R3RA bulletin in his lap. The student gives the
commands, in
order, to the wall maintaining good TR 0 and TR 1. When the
student falters or is uncertain of the next command he re-reads the
commands from the bulletin then continues to give the commands to
the wall. When the student can confidently give all the possible
R3RA commands accurately without any slightest comm lag, he has
passed this drill.
TR 102
NAME: Auditing A Doll
COMMANDS: All R3RA commands and New Era Dianetics procedures except
preassessment procedure.
POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and Auditor Report
sheets. In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying
the position of the pc.
PURPOSE: To familiarize the student with the materials of auditing and
coordinate and apply the commands and procedures of New Era
Dianetics in an auditing session.
TRAINING This drill is not coached. The student sets up the E-Meter and
work
STRESS: sheets exactly as in a session. He starts the session and runs
a com
plete New Era Dianetics session on the doll keeping full session
admin and using all standard procedures of New Era Dianetics.
This drill is passed when the student can do the drill
flawlessly with good TRs 0-4, correct procedure and commands,
without comm lags or confusion and can maintain proper
session admin, including worksheets, Auditor's Report Form
and Summary Report.
All the R3RA commands used in TR 101 are again used here. Admin must
communicate adequately which command is being used.
TR 103
NAME: Auditing On A Doll Coached
COMMANDS: All R3RA commands, situations and procedures of New Era
Dianetics except the preassessment procedure.
POSITION: Same as in TR 102 except that a coach sits beside student
calling out command numbers and situations and the student
following them and keeping admin and his meter.
PURPOSE: To give the student total certainty in the use of R3RA commands
despite any distraction.
TRAINING Coach calls for commands at random by stating the letter or
number
STRESS: of the command or the situation by saying "solid," "erasing""
"solid
but nothing earlier." The student addresses the right command or
action to the doll, handles meter and admin. The coach also uses pc
responses such as "That's all," "I can't find one," etc. These are
called for in quick succession and in any order. Coach starts in on a
gradient gradually getting the drill faster and becoming sharper on
flunks for any comm lags, uncertainties, groping for commands or
breaks in TR 0-4. If the student becomes too confused the coach
has probably proceeded with too steep a gradient and given the
student too many losses. In such instances have the student go
through the commands in proper sequence a few times and then
continue with random commands building up the drill on a
gradient.
The use of the correct command (including those for handling boun
cers, checking for erasure, and checking for postulates, as well as
correct narrative procedure) is required at the appropriate point.
TR 104
NAME: R3RA Coached And Bullbaited
COMMANDS: All R3RA commands and procedures.
POSITION: As for auditing on a doll (TR 102) with coach seated beside
student and a bullbaiter as "pc" across from the student
instead of a doll.
PURPOSE: To train the student to deliver a standard session with correct
commands and procedure and without session additives of any
kind despite distractions.
TRAINING The drill is the same as for auditing on a doll except that the
"pc"
STRESS: coach bullbaits the student auditor during the session in an
attempt
to throw the student off session while the second coach calls the
numbers as on TR 103. Flunks are given for any improper com
mands, procedure, comm lags, breaks in TRs or improper session
admin. The second coach does the "Start," the flunking or "That's
it." If the student is not making the grade he is returned to the
earlier TR that is out. This drill is coached tough and only passed
when the student is totally competent, exact and correct in
all com
mands, procedures, auditing actions and session admin with
excellent TRs and no slightest variation from or additives to
New Era Dianetics.
Coach ensures the student has total certainty on the application of
all R3RA commands and sequences including handling bouncers,
checking for erasure, checking for postulates, and handling
narrative incidents.
Preassessment procedure must also be correctly applied exactly as in
a session.
These drills were developed by me in July 1969 when it was found that
all failed sessions resulted from non-standard auditing, the
main goofs being auditors' failure to give the next command,
forgetting the commands in session or giving a wrong command.
New drills were added and existing drills were revised to include
drilling for the utilization of the discoveries of New Era Dianetics in
1978.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb.dr
Copyright � 1969. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JULY 1969RA
REVISED 13 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics
Grad Checksheet
Class VIII
Case Supers (Revisions in this type style)
Registrars
Public Officers (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
DIANETICS AND ILLNESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: It is now forbidden to run Clears, OTs or Dianetic
Clears on Dianetic Auditing Assists, secondaries, engrams or narrative
incidents. The only permitted Dianetic actions are Contact Assists and
Touch Assists. Clears and OTs may now receive New Era Dianetics for OTs at
AOs and Flag. (Ref: BTB 17 Sept 78 BREAKTHROUGH and HCOB 12 Sept 78
DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs.)
Although mention of this is made elsewhere in the Dianetics Course, the
facts about ILLNESS do not seem, in practice, to reach the Case Supervisors
or Dianetic auditors.
The idea that one can always get rid of an illness by auditing ONE
chain to basic is false. Man dreams about "one shot" cures to a point where
he could be accused of being impotent!
Here is an example: A preclear "has always wanted to get his bronchitis
handled." In Dianetics a list is made for chest or lung pains or
sensations. One is chosen and erased. The "bronchitis" is now better or
even absent for a few days. Then we have the preclear back again saying "It
didn't cure my bronchitis."
Enough cases are handled successfully by running one chain on a somatic
that people get stuck in the win.
Here is another example: The pc says he has migraine headaches. The
auditor assesses a "head pain" quite correctly and then runs out the chain.
The migraine does not occur for a week after. Then here's the pc again
saying "I've still got a headache."
All this is invalidative of the tech and the auditing. A registrar or
Public Division hearing this tends to lose faith in the powers of the tech.
The FACT is that the illness was not properly handled or C/Sed or
audited.
In the first place a pc trying to get cured of bronchitis or migraine-
or any one of a dozen other illnesses-should be sent for a medical
examination. How do you know the bronchitis isn't tuberculosis? Or the
migraine headache isn't a fractured skull?
A "continual side pain" may be a gallstone.
In short, something which continually hurts or disables may be
structural or physical.
So, when you omit the first action (medical) in handling an illness,
you set up an auditor for a possible failure.
Many of these things can be cured medically without too much heroic
action.
If it is medical and can be cured medically without destructive
consequences, then it should be.
Also it should be audited. This lets the medical treatment work. Many
"incurable" illnesses become curable medically when they are also audited.
The second thing that gets overlooked is that AN ILLNESS IS A COMPOSITE
(composed of many) SOMATIC.
The correct auditing action on "bronchitis" or "chest trouble" or
"migraine headache" or any other continual worrisome illness is to be found
on:
HCOB 28 Jul 71RA New Era Dianetics Series 8R
C/S Series 54RA DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
HCOB 18 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
This includes running the item by narrative incident, and then using
preassessment full procedure to find all the somatics, sensations,
feelings, emotions or even attitudes in the area affected, getting exact
feelings from these-as "running items" and running their chains to full
Dianetic EP.
It takes more than one chain of engrams to build up an ill area.
Having found and run the "deflated feeling" of bronchitis, which was
the first best read, the C/S should order and the auditor find and run the
NEXT somatic, sensation, feeling, emotion or attitude in that area.
It is sometimes necessary to add to the list for that area of the body.
Seeing a continual or recurring illness on the Original Assessment
Sheet (or subsequent assessments of it), the C/S and auditor should dig out
of that area every somatic, sensation, feeling, emotion, attitude, etc.
that can be made to read, using the preassessment procedure. And run those
chains, each one to basic and erasure. (See New Era Dianetics Series.)
THAT is the way you handle any illness, whether continual or temporary.
The maxim is that IT TAKES MORE THAN ONE CHAIN OF ENGRAMS TO MAKE A
BODY ILL.
Continual reassessing and adding to general lists will get there
eventually providing it is done long enough. But this general approach will
find a certain number of pcs saying to registrars, Public Officers and
friends, "I've still got my."
It is in fact a false report. They didn't still have all of it. It is
one chain less and therefore better.
But auditing gives gains by deletion. A pc does not suffer from what
has been erased. He suffers only from that which has not yet been handled.
With New Era Dianetics tech you handle all the chains that are making the
body ill.
Some persons tried years ago to get their trouble handled, somebody or
some practice failed and after that they don't mention it at all. They
don't support the technology anymore either.
So, in handling illness, give the handling of the structural disease
side of it to the medical doctor, and thoroughly handle all the mental side
of it with auditing and everyone wins.
Any registrar or Public Division personnel colliding with "My lumbosis was
not handled" should call this HCOB to the attention of the person, the Case
Supervisor and the auditors.
Only then can you have 100% tech.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ei.rd.lfg.kjm
Copyright (C 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JULY 1969
Issue II
Level VI
Solo Course
ONE-HAND ELECTRODES
A one-hand electrode shows as much as one TA div high and hides
floating needles. Some Solo students go mad trying to get their TA down
when they already have an F/N. The Solo auditor uses a one-hand electrode
but should have two cans handy to check and compare TA position and needle
phenomena.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ei
Copyright � 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JULY 1969R
REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
NED Checksheet
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
(This bulletin has been revised to delete references
to pre-OTs as they are not now audited on New Era
Dianetics, but receive instead the New Era Dianetics
Special Rundown for OTs.)
IMPORTANT
AUDITING SPEED
Almost any failure you have ever had with an auditor or in auditing
came from auditor comm lags or errors.
This is a vital datum. It came to light from applying the rule-ask the
pc what the auditor did after any failed session and get it corrected in
the auditor.
SPEED is the main factor behind the mystery of a failed session.
The better an auditor knows his TRs, his processes, his meter and admin
the faster he can operate.
If you train auditors only up to slow, comm laggy handling of a session
you will get a lot of mysteriously "failed sessions," ending with the TA
high and the pc very low!
A somewhat slow auditor auditing a new pc may be fast enough to get
away with it.
Put him on a person whose Dianetics is finished and some grades in, he
begins to have a few "case failures."
The remedy is to speed the auditor up with TRs 101, 102, 103, 104.
In assigning auditors you only dare assign fast ones to fast pcs.
For 19 years this hidden speed factor has lain behind the vast majority
of our "failed sessions." As it never appeared on the session reports
(except as excessive admin for which the pc must have had to wait) anyone
doing D of P work or C/S work was in mystery and tended to get desperate
and even squirrel (change and invent processes).
The only other source of failure was the physically ill aspect. This
has just been verified in a series of over one hundred cases. Dianetics
combined with Scientology reviews progressed splendidly on all but about
seven and these who were then physically examined thoroughly were found to
have serious and current physical illness.
Speed and accuracy then is the stress of all training and the lack of
it is the source of all auditing failures on pcs who are not severely ill.
Even the latter respond once their purely physical illness is properly
handled.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cs.ei.aap.nc-
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 JULY 1969R
REVISED 24 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
Case Supervisors
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
SERIOUSLY ILL PCS
In Green Form No. 40 there is an item:
"Seriously Physically Ill."
This is handled as follows:
1. Medical Examination
2. Medical Care
3. Auditing composed of the following:
Touch Assists, a Contact Assist, two-way comm, ruds on the
incident, ruds before the incident, Dianetic Assist, life ruds, two-
way comm on suppression, 3 S&Ds, assessment for area of illness,
Prepcheck on area, ruds on area, hello and OK with the affected
area, reach and withdraw from area, two-way comm, recall on persons
similarly ill, location of the postulate that caused it with itsa
earlier itsa, Prepcheck on the body or its part, more ruds,
assessment of failed purposes, two-way comm on the sickness.
That's not a program. It's just a list of a LOT of things to do. It
would not greatly matter what order they were done in but lighter actions
should be the earlier.
As a pc who is ill is easily made an effect, the auditing sessions
should be smoothly done and each session relatively short....
The remaining items on the GF 40 are then handled.
If "Seriously Physically Ill" is not THE GF 40 item, it is still
handled but in its turn doing the above... actions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldv
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
Cl IV Grad
Checksheets
Snr Cl VI (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheets (Ellipses indicate deletions)
C/Ses
(Class VIII tapes contain much data on Out of Valence
handling. This Bulletin, formerly Class VIII distribution,
has been revised to present a procedure whereby Snr
Class IV and VI auditors can do LX Lists and Out of
Valence handling on their pus. This revision in no way
revises Class VIII data.)
"LX" LISTS
There are now three "LX" Lists:
LX3-Attitudes
LX2-Emotions
LX1-Conditions.
Originally they were called "X" because they were experimental.
They still are to some extent so the X is retained.
These serve to isolate REASONS A BEING IS CHARGED UP TO SUCH an extent
that he is OUT OF VALENCE.
When a person is out of valence he does not easily as-is his bank.
These lists are assessed Method 5.
The best reading item (and then subsequently reading items) are taken
up and run by:
3-Way or Quad Recalls
3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA...
END PHENOMENA
We now have a new discovery. I have found that a person who is out of
valence experiences, when run on LX1 lists (and now the others above, LX2
and LX3) and 220H, a remarkable valence shift if he is run on enough items.
In one fashion or another he comments on this in session.
This is the end phenomena of Out of Valence processes (the LX items and
220H).
It is always attained if enough items are run.
Quite ordinary cases are out of valence. If their folder gets too fat
you can assume they are out of valence.
Perverts, suppressives and critical, snide, ruthless, arrogant or
contemptuous personalities are always out of valence.
A person who is in treason on the 1st dynamic is always out of valence.
So whether GF No. 40 (h) OUT OF VALENCE reads or not, if the folder is
fat, you play safe and assess and run LX items until the person has the
Valence cognition.
Without being coached, a person who is out of valence always has the
cognition if he is run on enough items and 220H.
USE OF LISTS
One begins with LX3. He assesses it Method 5 and takes the item that
read best, handles it, then the item that read next best, and so on down
the list.
If no EP, LX2 is taken up and handled in the same manner, then LX1.
220H is the last step of Out of Valence handling if the EP has not yet been
reached.
Today you can assume safely that anyone out of valence can be put in
valence quietly and efficiently with LX items and 220H if he is audited and
if the auditing is standard.
This is quite a worthwhile development as it resolves the heavily
overcharged case.
A symptom of a heavily charged case is F/Ning too quickly to be
processed well.
Using these lists on a pc is not a critical action. Even (and
especially) children are too overcharged to be easily audited.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.rd.dr
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 22 AUGUST 1978
Cl IV Grad
Checksheets (Revisions in this type style)
Snr Cl VI (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Checksheets
C/Ses
LX2
EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST
(To be done before LX1)
3 Way or Quad Recall
3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA
Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM
RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING
Date: _____________________________________
Pc Name:__________________________________
Apprehension ____________
Fear ____________
Hate ____________
Agitation ____________
Shame ____________
Blame ____________
Regret ____________
Grief ____________
Remorse ____________
Sorrow ____________
Sadness ____________
Despondency ____________
Depressed ____________
Despair ____________
Anger ____________
Rage ____________
Greed ____________
Haughty ____________
Arrogant ____________
Cold ____________
Contemptuous ____________
Hostility ____________
Resentment ____________
Antagonism ____________
Boredom ____________
Conservatism ____________
Enthusiasm ____________
Proud ____________
Elation ____________
Serenity ____________
Unemotional ____________
LRH:rs.rd.jk L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 21 AUGUST 1978
REISSUED 4 NOVEMBER 1978
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Snr Class VI (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheet (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
C/Ses
(Reissued 4 Nov 78 to correct typo-
correction in italics.)
LX1 (CONDITIONS)
(Formerly issued to Class VIII auditors
as a research list on 5 October 1968)
Used after LX3 and LX2.
3 Way or Quad Recall
3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA
Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM
RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING
Date: _____________________________________
Pc Name:__________________________________
Assessment for largest read.
Overwhelmed ____________
Made Wrong ____________
Forced ____________
Frightened ____________
Suppressed ____________
Crushed ____________
Oppressed ____________
Denied ____________
Overpowered ____________
Overthrown ____________
Defeated ____________
Destroyed ____________
Vanquished ____________
Wiped Out ____________
Annihilated ____________
Changed ____________
Identified ____________
Recognized ____________
Driven Out ____________
Driven Away ____________
Grief ____________
Loss ____________
LRH:rs.rd.kjm L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1969RA
Remimeo REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Class VIII RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class VIII Checksheet
Case Supervisors (Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS,
NEW ERA DIANETICS
There are only nine things that can go wrong in a New Era Dianetics
session.
These are the only reasons chains do not erase and the session does not
complete with very good indicators.
The first eight come under the head of auditing skill or knowledge.
They are listed in order of frequency:
1. Auditor comm lag (lack of speed in giving commands).
2. Flubbed commands in which the commands are used incorrectly.
3. TRs out, either being inaudible or overwhelming or TR 4 not
handled.
4. Auditor additives.
5. Failure to call for an earlier beginning of the incident when
the pa can find no earlier incident-results in grinding and high
TA.
6. Failure to call for an earlier incident when there is one.
7. Demanding pc goes earlier when the last incident was basic,
making pc jump into another chain.
8. Misassessment. (Selecting a narrative item and running it by
regular R3RA instead of by Narrative R3RA. Or choosing a multiple
item or an after the fact item to run. Or taking an item that
doesn't read or in which the pc has no interest.)
9. Pc has out rudiments.
Note that the first four are BEYOND THE VIEW OF THE CASE SUPERVISOR.
The largest number of session failures come under these first four.
Therefore it is routine for the Case Supervisor to have the pc asked what
the auditor did. It is usually surprising. It will be one of the first four
listed above. It requires a retrain.
The next four are also auditor flubs but are detectable if the Case
Supervisor reads the worksheets of the session.
Therefore the Case Supervisor must know 5, 6, 7 and 8 above very well
indeed and be able to look for them. In all of these the TA goes high or
very low and the session ends up as a bust.
You can easily see 5. The pc is still on the same chain but begins to
grind DEF DEF DEF DEF DEF, the TA goes way up or down below 2 and the
auditor command
"H." "Is there an earlier beginning to this incident?" is spectacularly
absent. So the C/S tells the next auditor to get the earlier beginning of
the same incident and run the incident from its earlier beginning, then go
earlier as necessary to complete the chain. It will eventually go to EP
with an F/N and the postulate coming off and VGIs obtained.
6 is very easy for the C/S to spot. The pc has been given DEF DEF DEF
DEF DEF, etc. and has been asked for an earlier beginning to the same
incident but hasn't been asked for an earlier incident. So the C/S tells
the next auditor to get an earlier incident.
7 is also easy for a C/S to detect from the worksheet of that session.
Before the pc jumped to another chain by being forced to go earlier below
basic, the TA was dropping and the incident was erasing, but the auditor
failed to ask, after each run through the incident, "Has it erased?" The pc
may have even given up a postulate, but the auditor missed the EP and
pushed the pc earlier. Also the pc protested or had trouble when the
auditor tried to go "earlier than basic" and also may mention another
somatic.
In 8, misassessment, you can tell just by looking at the item that it
is multiple such as "A burning pain in my hair and a feeling of tension on
my hand"; that it is narrative "getting my feet wet" (where's the feeling
in that???); or after the fact of the engram "dizziness after a car wreck."
A real classic would be "A stomach ache when I was thrown from a horse."
The C/S hardly has to look at the end of the session to know it will be no
erasure, high or low TA and bad indicators at the Examiner.
As auditors who do these last four things have their metering or basic
definitions madly out (such as "I never did understand what a somatic was")
and as in the first four the approach to the pc, TRs and additives need
ironing out, the C/S sends the auditor for retrain.
From the C/S point of view (and fact) the technology applied gets
uniform good results. Thus the C/S never gets reasonable.
The auditor will on retrain settle down. 100% sessions will occur
regularly when he really can audit.
PC REPAIR
The commonest C/S for a pc after a Dianetic session that ends with a
high TA or below 2 TA and/or bad indicators at Examiner is "L3RF Method 5
and Handle." If the L3RF, properly assessed and handled doesn't resolve it,
"To a Scientology auditor for a GF to F/N. Assess auditors, auditing,
Dianetics, Scientology, sessions, reviews, gains (or whatever you care to
add), Prepcheck."
OUT RUDS
In number 9, we get several manifestations. The pc has a good looking
session yet complains to the Examiner. That is to say VGIs F/N cog at
session end, but sour grapes ten minutes later at the Examiner's.
A pc who gets sad at session end and is or has been sad a long time and
is sad and moping or despondent is, of course, suffering from an ARC Brk
and is being audited over one and probably has had it for long duration.
The proper C/S action is "To a Scientology auditor for a GF to F/N. Check
ARC Brk Long Duration (LD)." This last is done with itsa earlier itsa and
ARCU CDEINR by the auditor.
The pc who is being audited over a PTP won't be making any gains. They
quickly evaporate. The C/S orders "To a Scientology auditor for a GF to
F/N. Check problems and being audited over problems."
When a pc is a bit nasty to the auditor or Examiner, he is of course being
audited over withholds. The C/S is "To a Scientology auditor for a GF to
F/N. Then check and pull all withholds and check if the pc has been audited
over withholds."
PHYSICALLY ILL PCs
When a pc is ill or has a history of illness you get him/her medical
attention and apply HCOB 24 July 69R, SERIOUSLY ILL PCs.
When a pc gets ill after auditing but the sessions look alright, you
can be pretty sure that the pc is being audited over out ruds so a C/S
orders "To a Scientology auditor for a GF to F/N. Assess GF 40 and handle
any out ruds found in that assessment first."
SPECIAL CASES
There may be some special versions of out ruds but they are all one
variety or another of out rud.
The pc himself can generate out ruds by lying to his New Era Dianetics
auditor. It still shows up as out ruds, withholds.
One pc (out of a hundred) said uniformly that "it was getting more
solid" to escape each incident, got himself into a jump chain situation
continually and became very ill indeed. This also operated as a withhold in
session. It was not detectable in the worksheets except that the pc became
ill. It came out while flying ruds in a review session.
But generally pcs don't act up in sessions if the auditing is
straightforward and many get better even when audited over all kinds of out
ruds.
When a C/S begins to be mystified concerning some pc, why betterment
isn't occurring-why the pc's manifestations and remarks never change-or the
pc becomes ill, then only three things need to be done. And all three
should be ordered by the C/S.
1. Medical exam and any treatment.
2. Review to straighten up all out ruds.
3. New Era Dianetics auditing, using both Narrative R3RA Quad and
full Preassessment procedure on troubled areas.
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT FORM
There is one other flub a bit maddening to a C/S.
When the C/S says "Assess existing lists or add" and the auditor says
no items, it is quite often an auditor flub, a special kind of 8 above-
misassessment.
One green auditor took 3 pcs in a row and could find no item,
concluding that each of the 3 pcs were done with Dianetics! It turned out
that the auditor's TR I was so bad the pcs couldn't hear her!
Another auditor didn't have his meter plugged in and another one was
found never to have done any meter drills.
Aside from getting the pc asked what the auditor did, which also should
be done when it's obvious there should have been an item and wasn't, the
C/S should order "Do a new Original Assessment Form" when the old list F/Ns
or draws a blank even when properly assessed.
The pc can also be sent to the Examiner to be asked if there is anything
not handled. The pc may give an area of interest. If there is one, but it
hasn't read, the C/S should send the pc to a Scientology auditor for GF to
F/N and probably a GF 40RD Expanded and handle. Then one can get the area
asked about in Review and Suppress and Protest put in on it and back to
Dianetics.
EXTERIOR
Some pcs go exterior and the auditor may have missed it and continued
auditing over it. Auditing past exterior can drive the TA high (or low) and
the pc may become very upset and/or ill.
C/S for an L3RF to be done to determine if the pc has gone exterior. If
so . . . and the pc has never had an Int RD the C/S would order an
Interiorization Rundown. The Int Rundown stabilizes the exteriorization and
makes it possible to audit the pc further.
Additionally, the pc could have had an Int RD that was messed up. This
would . . . be determined by an L3RF and if found the C/S would be for an
Int RD Correction List.... (If Int had been done and previously corrected,
the C/S would order an End of Endless Int Repair RD (HCOB 24 Sep 78) after
first having the pays folders FESed to ensure there were no unhandled Int
errors present.) The Int RD and its correction must be turned over to a
trained Scientology auditor.
When any Int actions, the Int RD, Int RD Correction or the End of
Endless Int Repair RD, as needed, has been successfully completed, put the
pc back on Dianetics.
I have personally C/Sed a vast number of Dianetic sessions and the
above is all I had to do or know to keep them all going well.
If you look for tricky processes in Dianetics to "solve" some case, you
will make a bad error as a C/S. They all come under the above data.
Good luck.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rs.ldm.ei.rd.lfg.dr
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 OCTOBER 1969RA
REVISED 19 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
Dn Checksheet
Class VIII
Checksheet
DRUGS,
ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS
(Note: This Bulletin has been revised to align with New Era
Dianetics Series Bulletins, in particular HCOB 15 July 71RA
111, Rev. 27 June 78 Re-rev. 19 Sept 78, C/S Series 48RA,
New Era Dianetics Series 9R, DRUG HANDLING.)
I have just made a real breakthrough on the action of pain-killers
(known as aspirin, tranquilizers, hypnotics, soporifics).
It has never been known in chemistry or medicine exactly how or why
these things worked. Such compositions are derived by accidental
discoveries that "such and so depresses pain."
The effects of existing compounds are not uniform in result and often
have very bad side effects.
As the reason they worked was unknown very little advance has been made
in biochemistry. If the reason they worked were known and accepted possibly
chemists could develop some actual ones which had minimal side effects.
We will leave the fact that this could be the medical biochemical
discovery of the century and let the Nobel Prizes continue to go to the
inventors of nose drops and new ways to kill and simply ourselves use it.
Biochemical tech is not up to the point at this time that it can utilize
it.
Pain or discomfort of a psychosomatic nature comes from mental image
pictures. These are created by the thetan or living beings and impinge or
press against the body.
By actual clinical test, the actions of aspirin and other pain
depressants are to:
A. INHIBIT THE ABILITY OF THE THETAN TO CREATE MENTAL IMAGE
PICTURES and also
B. TO IMPEDE THE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF NERVE CHANNELS.
Both of these facts have a vital effect on processing.
If you process someone who has lately been on drugs, including aspirin,
you will not be able to run out the Dianetic engram chains properly because
they are not being fully created.
If you process someone immediately after taking aspirin for instance,
you probably will not be able to find or assess the somatics that need to
be run out to handle the condition. For the next day after taking the
aspirin or drug the mental image pictures may not be fully available.
In the case of chronic drug taking, the drugs must be wholly worn off and
out of the system and the engrams of drug taking must be run out in their
entirety, triple or quad flow. If this is not done, auditing will be trying
to handle chains that aren't being fully created by the thetan.
In the case of auditing someone who has taken drugs-aspirin, etc.-
within the last few hours or two or three days, the chains of engrams
definitely will be found not fully created and therefore not available.
This would all be fine except for three things:
1. Auditing under these conditions is very difficult. The TA may
be high and will not come down. One gets "erasures" at TA 4.0 with
an "F/N." Auditing errors become easy to make. The bank (chains) is
jammed.
2. The thetan is rendered STUPID, blank, forgetful, delusive,
irresponsible. A thetan gets into a "wooden" sort of state,
unfeeling, insensitive, unable and definitely not trustworthy, a
menace to his fellows actually.
3. When the drugs wear off or start to wear off the ability to
create starts to return and TURNS ON SOMATICS MUCH HARDER. One of
the answers a person has for this is MORE drugs. To say nothing of
heroin, there are, you know, aspirin addicts. The compulsion stems
from a desire to get rid of the somatics and unwanted sensations
again. There is also something of dramatization of the engrams
already gotten from earlier drug taking. The being gets more and
more wooden, requiring more and more quantity and more frequent
use.
Sexually it is common for someone on drugs to be very stimulated at
first. This is the "procreate before death" impulse as drugs are a poison.
But after the original sexual "kicks" the stimulation of sexual sensation
becomes harder and harder to achieve. The effort to achieve it becomes
obsessive while it itself is less and less satisfying.
The cycle of drug restimulation of pictures (or creation in general)
can be at first to increase creation and then eventually to inhibit it
totally.
If one were working on this biochemically the least harmful pain
depressant would be one that inhibited the creation of mental image
pictures with minimal resulting "woodenness" or stupidity and which was
body soluble so that it passed rapidly out of the nerves and system. There
are no such biochemical preparations at this time.
These tests and experiments tend to prove that the majority of pain and
discomfort does come from mental image pictures and that these are
immediately created.
Erasure of a mental image picture by standard Dianetic processing
removes the compulsion to create it.
Drugs chemically inhibit the creation but inhibit as well the erasure.
When the drug has worn off the picture audited while it was in force can
return.
The E-Meter tone arm under drugs or on a drug case can go very high-TA
4.0 TA 5.0. It can also be dropped to "dead thetan" (a false Clear read).
Auditing a person on drugs can obtain an "erasure" and "F/N" at TA 4.0.
But the erasure is only apparent and must be "rehabbed" (verified or
redone) when the person is off drugs.
Any habitual drug taker, applying for auditing while still on drugs is
handled per New Era Dianetics Series 2R NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM
OUTLINE and New Era Dianetics Series 9R DRUG HANDLING.
A full drug handling program as the very first action would be done on the
case. (This includes Objective Processes, Sweat Out Program if LSD or Angel
Dust have been taken, Hard TRs Course, Narrative R3RA running of each
reading drug, medicine or alcohol, the preassessment of each reading drug,
medicine or alcohol, and the prior assessment, followed by additional
Objective Processes.)
TRs and Objective processing will ease the withdrawal symptoms of the
habitual drug user. (This includes alcohol.) Even though drug handling
steps are in progress, do not consider the drug has worn off until 6 weeks
have passed.
A person who has taken aspirin or other drugs within the past 24 hours
or the past week should be given a week to "dry out" before more auditing
is given.
Auditing assists can and should be given whenever needed despite the
pcs having taken drugs. The erasure of any engram chains run would then be
verified after the drug has worn off. (This can be up to 6 weeks for
certain drugs and medications such as anesthetics.)
No alcohol may be consumed within 24 hours before an auditing session
and where alcohol consumption has been excessive, the drying out period
would be extended to several days or a week.
It is not fatal to audit over drugs. It is just difficult, the results
may not be lasting and need to be verified afterwards.
Chronic drug takers who have not had drugs specifically handled may go
back to drugs after auditing as they were too drugged during auditing to
get rid of what was bothering them and which drove them to drugs.
With the enemies of various countries using widespread drug addiction
as a defeatist mechanism, with pain-killers so easily available and so
ineffective, drugs is a serious auditing problem.
It can be handled. But when aspirin, that innocent seeming pain-killer,
can produce havoc in auditing if not detected, the subject needs care and
knowledge.
The above data will keep the auditor clear of the pitfalls of this
hazard.
To paraphrase an old quote, we used to have iron men and wooden ships.
We now have a drug society and wooden citizens.
I've been studying this for over a year and a half and have made the
breakthrough.
Drug companies would be advised to do better research.
And auditors are advised to ask any pc, "Have you been taking any drugs
or aspirin ?"
The medical aspect is an understandable wish to handle pain. Doctors
should press for better drugs to do this that do not have such lamentable
side effects. The formula of least harmfulness is above.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.ei.rd.dr.nc
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1969R
Class IV Grad Issue V
Checksheets (HCOB 4 Aug 69 Amended and Revised)
Snr C/ass VI REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
Checksheets
C/Ses (Revisions in this type style)
LX3 (ATTITUDES)
(Used before LX2)
Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
Issue II URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM
RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 20 Sep 78 LX LIST HANDLING
Issue II
3 Way or Quad Recall
3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA
Date: __________________________________
Pc Name:_______________________________
Treachery ___________
Disloyalty ___________
Helplessness ___________
Hostility ___________
Rudeness ___________
Cruelty ___________
Disobedience ___________
Rebelliousness ___________
Wastefulness ___________
Stinginess ___________
Cowardliness ___________
Dirtiness ___________
Ungodliness ___________
Wickedness ___________
Cunning ___________
Criticism ___________
Falsity ___________
Pretense ___________
Glee ___________
Laughter ___________
Mockery ___________
Embarrassment ___________
Feeling Hurt ___________
Oppressive ___________
Ridicule ___________
Good ___________
Persecution ___________
Betrayal ___________
Guilt ___________
LRH:ldm.rs.rd.kjm L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1969, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1969R
Issue I
REVISED 27 JULY 1978
Remimeo (Revisions in this type style)
Class VIIIs (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Dn Auditors
Dn Checksheet
Checksheet IMPORTANT AND URGENT
Interne
Checksheets
All Classes
CASE SUPERVISION
AUDITING AND RESULTS
The whole "secret" of producing high case gain and total results with
New Era Dianetics and Scientology auditing lies in the following:
NEW ERA DIANETICS RESULTS
When an auditor can produce exact auditing on New Era Dianetics you
know he can audit.
New Era Dianetics is a very simple, precise procedure. The major errors
are:
(a) misassessment (inability to use a meter usually but out TRs can
do it)
(b) taking narrative items and running them as somatic chains
(c) forcing a pc toward "earlier incident" when it required
"earlier beginning" making the pc jump chains
(d) fumbling commands
(e) out TRs.
An auditor's poor TRs and corny errors such as above will prevent New
Era Dianetics results.
But the New Era Dianetics auditing is so simple THAT IT DEMONSTRATES
CLEANLY WHETHER THE PERSON CAN AUDIT OR NOT.
This is not true of Scientology auditing particularly VI, VII and VIII.
Here the procedure is more complex. The errors of the auditor are obscured
in the possibility of a wrong C/S or a complex pc. Thus whether the auditor
can audit or not, just as an auditor, is obscured.
Thus, with the auditor as a variable factor, the tech can look
variable.
Therefore you can lay down this rule as truth and it will be truth
until the end of time:
If a IV, V, VI, VII or VIII cannot produce invariably excellent results
his basic auditing is deficient but obscured by the complexity of material.
Therefore it is vital that an auditor be a proven result-getting New
Era Dianetics auditor before any result can be expected of him in his/her
Scientology auditing.
We have now had several dark mysteries cleared up on this subject with many
examples. For instance in 1969 when Standard Dianetics was introduced one
auditor who had been thought a competent VI and had been "auditing" for
years was found to be getting too many failed pcs; he was trained up as a
Standard Dianetic auditor and on his first sessions it was found that he
could not produce Standard Dianetic results; he was vigorously groomed on
his TRs which were wildly out and always had been and made to do the very
exact businesslike procedure of Standard Dianetics. He then got excellent
Standard Dianetic results session after session on his pc and could be
designated as a very good Dianetic auditor. He was briefly retreaded on his
Scientology materials and at once could get terrific results with upper
level Scientology.
From this we can state without any fear of contradiction by your future
experience that:
An VIII who is not a proven . . . Dianetic auditor as well is not
dependable as an auditor no matter who trained him.
The practice of loosely certifying HNEDAs without total proof that they
get excellent uniform session results on Dianetic pcs can foul up the whole
field and jeopardize the entire auditing future of the student. To certify
a New Era Dianetics auditor who doesn't get provenly excellent . . .
Dianetic results is an act of treason against all that person's future pcs
and all the rest of us.
If tech is "out" in an area it will be because some of the auditors,
whatever their class, are not capable of delivering simple Dianetic
sessions, regardless of the level at which they are auditing. And out tech
will be compounded if the Case Supervisor is not also an excellent New Era
Dianetics auditor for he won't know the errors for which to look.
When you can really dig this and know it and get it in practice the
bulk of out tech and "failed pcs" in an area will vanish.
I know it is sometimes hard to achieve a simplicity as simple as New
Era Dianetics but when it is done, tech worries from there on up are over.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rs.ei.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1969RB
Issue III
Remimeo
Class VIII REVISED 3 AUGUST 1978
Class VIII RE-REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
Checksheet
Course Supervisors (Revisions in this type style)
Registrars
Dianetic Checksheet
Dianetic Auditors
(This Bulletin has been revised to align with New Era
Dianetics tech. The Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive is
given in HCOB 2 July 1978 New Era Dianetics Series 11,
DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE.
There are, additionally, Scientology steps to the Student
Rescue Intensive, which can be done by a trained Scientology
auditor. These steps are contained herein, to give you
additional Student Rescue Intensive steps you can do on your
pc if you are a Class III or above Scientology auditor AND a
New Era Dianetics auditor.)
STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE
In working with a student, a supervisor found that engrams and
secondaries gather around the subject of study and developed some material
on it which I tested and redeveloped.
He said:
"The subject of study has been abound with 'authorities' and boobytraps
forever and a day, but until Ron researched this field of human endeavour
and published his findings on tapes, HCOBs and Policy Letters, nobody has
EVER made any progress toward the resolution of study itself as a problem.
"In this very day and age we find physical punishments of students the
rule rather than the exception, and even the use of instruments like canes,
sticks, shoes and such like articles in order to 'teach' a student (create
'ARC') is accepted as normal practice.
"The phenomena of secondaries and engrams resulting thereof, which
inhibit study are not known about or completely ignored, and often handled
by a further duress.
"And many a once bright keen young student throws in his study in
despair and goes to the nearest oculist for even stronger lenses in his
glasses to help his ruined eyesight.
"THE SUBJECT, THE VERY IDEA OF STUDY ITSELF HAS BECOME TRAUMATIC, IT IS
AN AREA OF LOSSES AND PHYSICAL PAINS."
The Class VIII C/S can be audited by a Class III who is also a New Era
Dianetics auditor.
1. Fly a rud to F/N.
2. Do Remedy A on Dianetics or Scientology. (Omit if student has
had one.)
3. Do Remedy B. (Omit if student has had one.)
(Ref: Book of Case Remedies
HCOB 9 Nov 67 Review Auditor's Book of Case Remedies
Revision of Remedy A, Remedy B and S and Ds)
4. Assess:
Being Trained Education
Being Educated Schools
Study Teachers
Learning Enforcement
Stress Misunderstoods
5. Prepcheck best reading item.
This completes the Scientology steps of the Student Rescue Intensive.
DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE
6. Take the item found in 4 above and do a preassessment on it.
7. Find the running item, using standard preassessment procedure.
(Ref: HCOB 18 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4 ASSESSMENT AND HOW
TO GET THE ITEM.)
8. Run out the item you have found in Step 7, R3RA Quad (or Triple
if pc is not yet Quaded).
9. Repeat the preassessment on the original item found in Step 4
and repeat Steps 7 and 8 on that item.
10. Continue reassessing the Preassessment List on the original
item and running out R3RA Quad the best reading running item until
there are no further reads on the preassessment of that original
item.
The intensive should be concluded when the pc is now happy about study.
PROMOTING STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVES
Any org or course has on it some slow students or students who easily
dope off while attempting to study, or students who become upset by study
or try to blow.
A registrar should periodically obtain a list of these and see that
they are sold a Student Rescue Intensive.
A Student Rescue Intensive is not run until the pc has been completed
up to Action Eleven of the New Era Dianetics Full Pc Program Outline (HCOB
22 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 2) as it would interrupt his program
because drugs, if he has taken any, are a probable contributory cause to
being unable to study. Also the Student Rescue Intensive is not a
substitute for proper Word Clearing of Dianetic, Scientology and earlier
courses and training. It does, however, make the latter much more
effective.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1969, 1973, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 DECEMBER 1969
OTL DK to issue
to all SHs
and AOs
Ltr Reg's Hats
Reg's Hats
Tech Sec
OES
To Master Files WW
SOLO AUDITING AND R6EW
(Cancels Base Order No. 9 which removed HDC as a
prerequisite of R6EW Solo)
The problems of a person on Solo not knowing how to audit gives us a
great deal of trouble in AOs as well as SHs.
The R6EW checksheet has been several times revised and at one time
incorrectly has included all kinds of implants to study. Also, the
materials to be audited have in the past erroneously been issued as part of
the R6EW study pack.
In all such Solo courses the person is not issued what he will
eventually audit on until he has completed the study pack. He then attests
or is examined and having passed, he is given a review session to, mainly,
fly his ruds. He is then issued the auditing materials and gets on with his
Solo. Where this sequence is violated trouble occurs.
We have also had people glance at the materials to be audited, pick out
something that strikes their interest and then go and attest leaving an out
grade.
The troubles on Solo courses are
1. Has no real training as an auditor.
2. Is given unnecessary or unhelpful materials to study.
3. Is issued the auditing materials he will Solo audit before he
attests to the study materials.
4. Wasn't ready for the grade and will use it to cure an ARC break
or ingrown eyelids, these not having been handled in earlier
auditing.
5. Doesn't actually audit the Solo materials but attests leaving
an out grade.
The above are, by experience, a general rundown of the problems having
to do with all Solo grades.
They begin with R6EW. When this is out they have trouble from there on.
The essence of this course is that one is trying to make a SOLO
auditor, not a person who can audit others.
In 1969 I ordered the HDC materials to go on the R6EW checksheet.
Someone re-interpreted this as "The Dianetics Course is a requisite for
R6EW Solo" which is wild.
People enrolling on this course are going the SOLO route. There are 2
routes, called the SOLO and the PROFESSIONAL.
Solo auditors must have meter lessons and other theory so they know about
mental image pictures. They must also do actual Solo sessions well BEFORE
GOING NEAR THE MATERIALS OF THE GRADE.
Thus the Solo Course R6EW breaks down into these requisites:
1. The person as a case to have had all grades up to the level including
Dianetics Triples, any other Scn auditing like Class VI auditors use,
Scientology Triples, Acceleration and POWER. If the student hasn't got all
these he'll never make it as a CASE on Solo. Thus (1) is GET GRADES DONE
BELOW R6EW.
2. The Solo student must be trained on the meter, about the time track,
mental image pictures and any other theory needful without
(a) trying to teach him a full Academy Course or
(b) denying him vital data needed in Solo.
He must for instance be able to fly his ruds. So (2) is GET THEORY IN AND
ADEQUATELY LEARNED.
3. The student must be able to do Solo auditing drills which would begin
with drills such as the E-Meter book drills done Solo. These include
keeping the admin properly. So (3) is PRACTICAL SOLO DRILLS.
4. The student needs to do actual auditing Solo which help him and his
case. These would include running a light lock, cleaning up an ARC break,
handling a PTP, doing a clean up on overts (rather than W/Hs). Such
sessions would have to go to a Supervisor, each one, for C/Sing. When he
can actually handle himself Solo, he is then and only then finished with
his training. IF HE STILL CAN'T SOLO AUDIT, REQUIRE A FULL HDC COURSE BE
TAKEN. So (4) is PROVE HE CAN SOLO AUDIT.
5. The student is now issued his auditing materials for the grade. These
MUST NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY PACK AS HE WILL SELF-AUDIT ON THEM AND
NOT GET TRAINED. So (5) is ONLY ISSUE THE GRADE MATERIAL WHEN ALL STUDY IS
COMPLETE.
6. When the auditing is done, or session by session as C/S is available,
and the student is seen to have actually done it by folder he is permitted
to attest. So (6) is DON'T PERMIT ATTESTATION WITHOUT CONFIRMATION OF
ACTUAL AUDITING.
The checksheets and actions of R6EW (and any other Solo course or
grade) must be in keeping with these stipulations or there will be no
adequate result from Solo grades.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rs
Copyright � 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 FEBRUARY 1970
UK Stn Ship
Only
GROUP ENGRAM PROCESS
A group is composed of individuals. If they have a group engram it only
has force because of basics on that subject in their banks. Thus, if they
are cleaned up on the general subject, the general group engram should blow
off and disappear.
This, therefore, is done on every member of the group.
LISTING, NULLING and TRS MUST BE FLAWLESS.
(1) Do the Info Sheet provided below.
(2) Fly a rud to F/N. If TA high get it down by listing "What has
been overrun?" to a BD item and rehab it to F/N.
(3) List by laws of listing and nulling but be sure to get a BD
item, which F/Ns, the question "What is the greatest overt you have
ever committed on the whole track?" The list may be rather long.
(4) Now run (despite F/N) "What ARC break occurred just before
that?" Use ARCU and CDEI. Desist on this step at the first F/N cog
VGIs.
(5) Now list, "What is the most unwanted change experienced by this
or another org?" By L & N to a BD item and F/N.
(6) "What ARC break was connected with that?"
(7) Now list the question by L & N "What purpose has failed?" This
should be to a BD item. It will F/N and the pc cognite and GIs.
(8) "What ARC break was connected with that?" ARCU CDEI to F/N
VGIs.
Note to auditor-if you can't get it to F/N prepcheck it but if correct
items all above lists really should F/N.
Info Sheet
Org Name
_________________________________________________________________________
Name of Member
(Print)_______________________________________________________________
Level or Grade of
case_________________________________________________________________
TA at Start____________________________Needle
behavior_________________________________
General attitude to
auditor______________________________________________________________
The session should be rapid and deft. Do not however overwhelm by
chopping comm. Follow "End Phenomena and F/N" data as per recent HCOB 20
February 70. This is particularly important in the "Greatest Overt" process
as pc gets introverted in listing.
In doing this on group members who are being called in, it is important
to inform them "This is not a Sec Check. It is a new process being run to
help the org." This can be posted on the board. Do NOT tell them you are
running a group engram as they will become enturbulated, self-list, etc.
Any pc who is sick a day or two afterward has had a wrong item given
him or her.
On members of the group not previously audited by anyone, Tech Services
for the operation should do the Info Sheet using a meter for TA and needle
state and not put the person through to actual session but info the D of T
to get the person audited on Dianetics.
LRH:jz L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 MARCH 1970
UK Stn Ship
Only
IMPORTANT NOTE ON GROUP
ENGRAM INTENSIVE
A pc who is on a specific cycle of auditing should never have it
interrupted to do another cycle. This is an invariable rule. Complete an
auditing cycle once begun.
Example: Pc in the middle of having flows 2 and 3 run on Dianetics,
given a Group Engram Intensive before Dn Triples completed. The Group
Engram Intensive tends to collide with the cycle already in progress and
the TA goes high at Examiner.
There are certain basic rules that make standard tech, standard tech.
One of them is complete an auditing cycle before beginning another.
Doing "whole org" auditing actions can collide with this unless it is
watched.
LRH:nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 MARCH 1970
Class VIII
Checksheet
Class VIII C/S DOUBLE FOLDER DANGER
Checksheet
When a pre-OT has a Solo and an auditing folder, both, there is a great
danger if the Case Supervisor does not look at BOTH before C/Sing.
There has been an instance of a pre-OT running strange C/Ses on
himself. Another ran C/Ses out of other folders on himself. In both cases
the consequences were hard to repair when finally found.
In another case in the Solo folder the pre-OT had gone exterior with
full perception. But the non-Solo auditing folder was being C/Sed. The TA
shot up for 2 months without any C/S except myself calling for all folders.
Pre-OTs unfortunately run on a Solo folder and an audited folder.
Unless both are to hand when C/Sing wild errors can be made by the C/S.
There is also the case of a person having two audited folders, being
C/Sed at the same time. This is an admin error.
The firm rule is C/S ONLY WITH ALL FOLDERS TO HAND.
The embarrassing situation where one can't get a folder from another
org or field auditor or where the old folder is lost has to be made up for
somehow. It mustn't halt auditing totally.
LRH:dr.wa L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 JUNE 1970RA
Issue II
REVISED 6 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 12RA
GLOSSARY OF C/S TERMS
Ref: HCOB 5 Apr 77 Expanded Grades
HCOB 24 Sept 78 Dianetic C/ear
Issue III
HCOB 22 June 78R NED Series 2R
New Era Dianetics Full
Pc Program Outline
RECOVERY PROGRAM: The pack of
LRH EDs 100 Int 10 May 70 Lower Grades Upgraded
102 Int 20 May 70 The Ideal Org
103 Int 21 May 70 Fast Flow Grades Cancelled
104 Int 2 Jun 70 Auditing Sales and Delivery
Pgm No. 1
106 Int 3 Jun 70 What Was Wrong
107 Int 3 Jun 70 Orders to Divisions for
Immediate Compliance
10 SH 6 Jun 70 SH Pcs
108 Int 11 Jun 70 Auditing Mystery Solved
101 Int 21 Jun 70 Popular Names of
Developments
comprising the program to recover full use and results of EXPANDED LOWER
GRADES.
PROGRESS PROGRAM:
What is called a "Repair Program" on the first issue of the C/S Series
HCOB just being issued is renamed a PROGRESS PROGRAM. It has been found
that case gain which has not been earlier achieved can be consolidated by a
PROGRESS PROGRAM. It takes 25 hours, can be done by a Class I or above as
long as it is C/Sed by an VIII who has Narrated on the new C/S Series. This
is quite a technical development in itself. It is the answer to a pc who
had "Quickie Grades" and didn't actually reach full abilities in earlier
Scientology auditing. It is followed by an Advance Program which follows
below.
ADVANCE PROGRAM:
This is what was called a "Return Program" in the C/S Series. The name
is being changed from "Return" to "Advance" as more appropriate. It gets
the pc really up to where he should be. It may take 50 hours or more.
EXPANDED LOWER GRADES:
Pcs won't like being told they "have to have their lower grades rerun."
Actually that's not a factual statement anyway. The lower grades harmonic
into the OT Levels.
They can be run again with full 1950-1960 to 1970 processes as given on the
SH courses all through the 1960s. These are now regrouped and sorted out
and are called EXPANDED LOWER GRADES. See also HCOB 5 April 77, Expanded
Grades and
HCOB 22 June 78R, New Era Dianetics Series 2R, NED Full Pc Program Outline.
There are no Dianetic or Scientology single or "Quickie" lower grades
anymore.
DIANETIC CLEAR:
The state of C/ear can be achieved on Dianetics.
It is not however attained by feeding people cognitions; Clears are
made through auditing.
The state of Dianetic C/ear means the pa has erased his Dianetic case
or mental image pictures.
The discovery that a Dianetic C/ear must not be run on engrams, R3RA or
any version of R3R, results in an expansion of the Non-lnterference Zone.
After Dianetic C/ear, you can run Grades O-IV. You do not run the pc on
the R3RA section of the new Service Fac handling, however. He can be given
Touch or Contact Assists (as can Clears and OTs), but not a Dianetic
Auditing Assist nor any Dianetic auditing.
A Dianetic C/ear is not run on Power, R6EW or the Clearing Course, but
goes directly onto OT I (after doing the Solo Auditor Course).
CLASSIFICATION CHART:
This chart "Classification and Gradation Chart" has been reissued many
times. All issues are more or less valid. To save print, the process run
column appears in "Processes Taught" on the auditor side of the chart. All
these processes and more are used in Expanded Lower Grades. The chart is
valid.
QUICKIE GRADES:
Persons were too demanding to be done quickly. On many cases these
grades as given were valid but a large number of cases needed Expanded
Lower Grades. 20 minutes from Grade 0 to IV and 5 minutes Power was far
more than many could stand up to. These need a PROGRESS PGM and an ADVANCE
PGM. This is true of persons at VA or R6EW or on CC or OT Levels. All these
who haven't fully made it need a PROGRESS PGM and an ADVANCE PGM "to pick
up all the latent gain they missed."
DIANETIC PCS:
Dianetic pcs should be audited on New Era Dianetics until no somatics, then
go up through Quad or Expanded Lower Grades to Power, R6EW, Clearing Course
and OT Levels.
TRAINING:
Any pc who has trouble needs training and the amount of time required in
Expanded Lower Grades and so on makes it cheaper to be trained.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd.nc
Copyright � 1970. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1970RA
RE-REVISED 9 APRIL 1977
Remimeo
C/S Series 13RA
VIII ACTIONS
(GF 40, IV Rundown, VIII Case Supervision.)
Inevitably, when any new approach or process is released, some will
instantly assume that all "older" (actually more basic) data has been
cancelled. There is no statement to that effect. It is not guessed that
this will be assumed and so we could lose an entire subject.
We did in fact lose Dianetics for a decade and all but lost Scientology
in the following ten years.
A subject can be reorganized and made more workable. That was done in
1969 for Dianetics. BUT IT HAD NEVER BEEN UNWORKABLE!
The 1969 Dianetics reorganization refined the 1962-63 discoveries of R-
3-R. A better communication was made to the user and the preclear.
Amazingly, the reissue of Dianetics as Standard Dianetics caused about
a dozen people (even in high places unfortunately) to at once assume that
Dianetics wiped out any need for Power, Scientology clearing or anything
else! Even an unauthorized Policy Letter, (not signed by me) and an HCOB
(also not signed by me) gave this impression. They were of course cancelled
the instant they were discovered to have been sent out.
This idea that the "old" is always cancelled by anything "new" has its
root in the idea that a later order cancels earlier orders, which is true.
But orders are one thing and tech basics another.
What if, in the science of physics, a book by Professor Glumph came
out, omitting the three laws of motion and gravity. It is assumed then that
Newton's laws are no longer valid. Because they are old. (Newton lived
between 1642 and 1727.) So some young student engineer is baffled because
bridges have weight and can't work out gravity or motion! And he and his
fellows begin to build without knowing these laws and there goes the whole
of engineering and the culture itself!
This is no fantasy. As a college student in upper math I was utterly
baffled by "calculus." I couldn't find out what it was for. Then I
discovered it had been developed by Sir Isaac Newton, examined the basics
and got the idea. My college text omitted all the basic explanations and
even the authorship of the subject! Calculus today is really not enough
used because it isn't understood.
Anyway, here's the main surprise: Until 1970 the whole of Scientology
was never in use in processing! Students had ridden along with the research
line up into the OT sections, discarding the ladder behind them. For nearly
3 years an increasing proportion of preclears were not actually making it.
The gradient to get them onto the Bridge had been neglected as "old" when
in fact they were not "old" but BASIC.
The amazement of auditors (and their delight) when the HCOB on Auditors
Rights (C/S Series No. 1) was released indicated that they had become
"process oriented" with all the WHY gone.
VIII AUDITING
The 1968 VIII standardization aimed actually at good TRs, auditing
presence, and basics in auditor performance. VIII auditing was developed to
handle the Or band.
It is entirely valid. Its only omission was detailed actions now
developed as to how to handle a pc or pre-OT who had been pulled up the
line and had fallen on his head.
Out grades was spotted and discussed in detail in VIII auditing.
Giving lower grades fast was the only error. It was not realized in
1968 that end phenomena of lower grades was not being required.
The re-release of the entire band of Academy and Saint Hill materials
in 1970 is a re-emphasis on the validity and necessity of using it ALL on
pcs! And in understanding the mind and life! And all this is quite welcome
and very successful. Not noticed is that this whole band was never before
presented for full use on all pcs. As I say 19501969 auditors had been
riding with the "newest and latest" because it was "popular." Only a few
wise old-timers continued to use the most basic actions.
But just as VIII auditing was an unauthorized signal to suppress all
that had been known before, so now, with the full release for use of
Expanded Lower Grades, a few began to say that VIII auditing was now "old"!
One assumes then that some like to be able to say that something is now
"old." Has a superior sort of ring to it, I guess. Anyway we'd better
disregard this tendency to retire basics. It is more amusing than
otherwise. So let's get on with the job.
RESISTIVE CASES
The RESISTIVE CASE Rundown is an VIII development TO HANDLE THOSE WHO
CANNOT MAKE THE GRADES.
It was put into the Green Form as GF 40 so as to preserve it.
To it could now be added "Overwhelmed." This would indicate need of
Repair (Progress) and Return (Advance) Programs. But many other indicators
exist already.
So when do you use a GF 40?
Let us say the pc has been run on Grade Zero. And at the Examiner
cannot or does not attest.
One would first look for simple auditing errors in recent sessions.
These would get reviewed and corrected.
One would then look for lower actions than Grade Zero that had been
missed.
If it still seemed hard to figure out, one would use a GF 40, Resistive
Cases.
In essence, if one adds "Overwhelm" to the GF 40 list you have on it
all the reasons a pc won't advance IF he has been run on all processes up
to that point.
Overwhelm would indicate need of a Repair and Return.
Grade I, Problems, is the usual ordinary reason for no case advance.
Problems shows up as an out rud in GF 40 and is simply put in as a rud
not as a grade.
But if a Grade II or above has a problem??? That means Grade I is out.
GF 40 remains even more plainly as a "When all else fails."
It is used that way.
When a pc doesn't attest, and all has been done for him otherwise, you
use a GF 40.
This was its proper use in the first place.
All such materials except rapid or Quickie Grades are valid.
And (joke) these remarks on GF 40 Resistive Cases does not wipe out
"Repair and Return Programs."
IV RUNDOWN
The so-called IV Rundown as taught on the VIII Course is of course
quite valid.
Originally developed to catch cases that had somehow gotten up to OT
III and were falling on their heads, it is a collection of actions. It
salvaged many cases.
The missing datum was that in recent times these cases were falsely
reported to have had their lower grades. THEY, the cases themselves, said
they had "had lower grades." This made a mystery. The fact is, with
multiple declare (declaring 0 to IV to the Examiner all at one time mostly
without any mention of end phenomena of the grade) these cases were OUT
GRADE in the extreme.
The IV Rundown was an effort to catch it all up to make a real OT.
"Out Grades" didn't read as it didn't mean anything to the pc and
besides "they'd all been rehabbed a dozen times anyway." But nobody
mentioned never having attained any end phenomena and the Class Chart was
never really gotten IN IN IN in the first place.
You will find many pcs have had various parts of the "IV Rundown" run
earlier.
For awhile it was the fashion to use the IV Rundown or a part of it on
any balky case at any level.
At OT IV (which was an audited step and none of it really confidential)
the C/S simply ordered run whatever was left of it not already run.
Somewhere on the case all of the IV Rundown still should be run. But of
course that would now be on a Return (Advance) Program and well up the
line.
If Repair-Return doesn't get a grade made this is the time to do a IV
Rundown. On (3) Valence Shifter - LX1, LX2, LX3 lists can be done in
triple, recall, secondary, engram.
Earlier Practices, Former Therapy can also be triple, recall,
secondary, engram.
This is on Page 28 (not 23) of the original VIII Case Supervisor Manual
and part of it is also now GF 40.
If a case really needs this he won't be making a lower grade really so
the GF 40 or its slightly wider OT IV Rundown can be used.
To both, "Overwhelmed by auditing" should be added in any future issue
to indicate a needed repair action.
CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS
HCOB 10 Dec 1968 "Case Supervisor Actions" Confidential, VIIIs only, is
still valid. It remains confidential as it mentions some OT phenomena that
would spin a Grade VA. However, some VIII C/S is going to be told that
"Expanded Lower Grades changes all that." It doesn't.
Listen: In the next to last paragraph of the cover page of this manual
(HCOB 10 Dec 68) it says:
"Standard grades are not part of this set-up AS IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT
THE AUDITOR KNOWS THESE. Directions to do standard grades are written on a
blank sheet." (I have added the block letters for emphasis here.)
At the time this was written I had not discovered that lower grades
were gone out of use and I let be published Triple Grades which seemed to
condense all lower grades. The major process or major grade process may not
be enough to make a pc make a lower grade. I am sorry I gave any support at
all to such an idea by not examining the whole scene when it began to show
up. I did find it and did correct it however when auditing statistics over
the world showed the fault. (28 hours was the total weekly delivery of
orgs!!)
If you add the dozens and dozens of lower grade processes as given in
Expanded Lower Grades to the VIII C/S HCOB of 10 Dec 68 and included this
C/S Series and its new development of Repair (Progress) and Return
(Advance) Programs you would have the whole package of C/Sing.
So the VIII actions are all valid.
Auditor classes below VIII have this C/S Series. The AO C/S Course adds
in the VIII actions as well.
Any C/S who does not know well The Original Thesis, Dianetics: The
Evolution of a Science, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.
Scientology 8-80 and Scientology 8-8008 will go badly astray. It is vital
to know these books and others in this area, to know what one is trying to
handle.
Class VI (SHSBC) tapes and bulletins are all valid and vital to lower
grade auditing and C/Sing.
I trust this gives the C/S some idea of what is still "in."
It all is.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by CS-4/5
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JE:dz.nt.dr
Copyright � 1970, 1973, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JULY 1970R
(Corrected and Reissued 25 Nov 1970)
Remimeo
Dianetic REVISED 17 JULY 1978
Auditor
Dianetic (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheets (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
UNRESOLVED PAINS
It occasionally happens that a pc's certain pain does not resolve on
Dianetics.
There are two reasons for this:
1. NOT ENOUGH AUDITING ON ENOUGH CHAINS.
Sooner or later the exact small piece of an engram "already run" shows
up on another chain later.
Example: Pain in an area of an operation occurs now and then again
weeks, months or years after the operation has been run out as an engram.
Sooner or later just on general auditing the missing bit of the operation
shows up, blows. Voila! Pain gone forever.
This is peculiar especially to abdominal operations like an
appendectomy. The operation was run out. The scar stays puffy. The pc is
occasionally ill from it. Pc's conclusion is that Dianetics hasn't worked
on it. More auditing on other somatics (just general Dianetics) is given.
One day the remaining bit of the operation, hidden from view, apparently
erased, shows up, blows. Pc now fine.
A reason for this is "overburden" in that the incident was too charged
in one place to be confronted. As the whole case is unburdened, confront
comes up. The piece that was missing (and giving the pain) blows.
There is no way of forcing it. In fact it would be fatal to try.
The other reason for it is that the missing bit causing the pain is a
different somatic like "a chest compression." This bit of the operation had
another basic than the one run.
The answer to a persistent or recurring somatic in an injured area is
always more Dianetic auditing.... Persistent, chronic and recurring
somatics are handled fully with New Era Dianetics Series tech.
Reference: HCOB 28 July 71 R New Era Dianetics Series 8
Rev. 25.6.78 DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
HCOB 18 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 26 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 6
Issue II ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB to Sept 70R CHRONIC SOMATIC, DIANETIC HANDLING OF
C/S Series 18R
HCOB 16 Aug 70R GETTING THE F/N TO EXAMINER
C/S Series 15R
2. SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM PAINS.
There are two sides to the body. As you learn in Touch Assists, if the
right hand is injured you include also the left hand.
Body nerves conduct pain. The two sides of the body interlock. Pain
gets stopped in the nerves.
If the right elbow is hurt the LEFT elbow will have echoed the pain.
Example, you find a pc with a pain in the left elbow. You try to audit a
left elbow chain. It doesn't fully resolve.
If you ran injuries to the RIGHT elbow, suddenly there's a somatic
going through the left elbow! It gets well.
This is the sympathetic nervous system. The right ear, injured, also
gets echoes with a somatic in the left ear. You audit the right ear only.
Pc comes up with a sore left ear!
You can actually direct a pc's attention to it (non-standard but a
research technique) and he can find where the uninjured ear echoed the
injured ear.
Where you can't fully repair a crippled left leg, don't be surprised to
find it was the right leg that was hurt.
You audit the left leg somatic in vain. If you do, start auditing
somatics in the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE BODY.
TOOTHACHE
The mystery of toothache is resolved in both 1 and 2 above, especially
2.
The pain is concentrated on the left upper molar. You audit it in vain.
Toothache persists.
Look at the pc's mouth. Has the RIGHT upper molar ever been pulled or
injured? Yes. That's how the left molar began to decay. The right upper
molar was pulled. The pain (especially under the pain-killer on the right
side only) backed up and stopped on the opposite side. Eventually the left
upper molar, under that stress, a year or ten later, caves in and aches.
Mysterious as it wasn't injured. Mysterious as the opposite molar is
long gone, doesn't hurt anymore.
When a toothache does not resolve in auditing, audit the opposite tooth
on the other side. You can actually do it by count of teeth.
It's sort of auditing a no somatic.
Pc in misery with right upper molar. No pain on left side. Audit an
injury he had on the left side (it will read on the meter also). Voila! The
toothache that wouldn't go away eases up!
The fellow who has the exact opposite teeth pulled (upper right wisdom,
upper left wisdom) is in for it as there is a constant cross-play. Makes
the mouth odd and pressury. Both sides are reacting to the other side!
Dentists often note the strange pressure, "bursting feelings," a
patient has when a tooth "needs pulling." This is the stress in the nerves
from an injury which occurred on the opposite side!
An auditor can audit a right side tooth in vain unless he knows enough
to audit THE OTHER SIDE.
For a pc with a toothache, on the right side, you can list for feelings
on the left side of the mouth and get "numbness," "no feeling," etc. Audit
that list and suddenly magically the toothache on the opposite side not
being audited eases up.
Full preassessment of the troubled area and R3RA Quad is used when the
tooth trouble persists.
As toothaches sometimes give a Dianetic auditor a failure, he should
know about the sympathetic factor as above. The failure becomes a success.
LRH:sb.kjm.rd.lfg L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 AUGUST 1970R
REVISED 7 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Dn Checksheet
Class VI (Revisions in this type style)
Class VIII (Ellipses indicate deletions)
C/S Checksheet
C/S Series 15R
GETTING THE F/N TO EXAMINER
(High, Low TAs and Chronic Somatics)
(Note: This Bulletin has been revised to include
references to the New Era Dianetics Series tech.)
If after an F/N session end the pc's TA goes up, as at the Examiner's
in an org. the pc is afflicted with unflat engram chains.
All high TAs depend on unflat or restimulated engram chains.
TAs go high on overrun because the overrun restimulates engram chains
not yet run.
Engram (or secondary or lock) chains can be keyed-out. This does not
mean they stay out. In a few minutes or hours or days or years they can key
back in.
A pc will also de-stimulate in from 3 to 10 days usually. This means he
"settles out." Thus a pc can be overrun into new engram chains (by life or
an auditor), TA goes up, 3 to 10 days later the TA comes down.
When a pc is audited to F/N VGIs and then a few minutes later has a
high TA the usual reasons are:
1. Has had his comm chopped or full Dianetic or Scientology end
phenomena not reached or
2. Has been run on an unreading item or subject or
3. Is overwhelmed or
4. Has a lot of engrams keying in or
5. Has been run in the past without full erasure of engrams or
attaining end phenomena.
6. Lists badly done or other misauditing cause a pc to feel bad
and key-in chains also.
7. A pc can be audited when too tired or too late at night.
The solution to any of these is easy-on (1) always see that the pc
attains full EP, particularly on engram chains. On (2) make auditors check
for read even in two-way comm subjects, list questions or Dianetic items
before running them. On (3) see also (2) and get the pc a proper Progress
(Repair) Program. On (4) repair or isolate pc so his PT isn't so ferocious
looking (meaning Repair (Progress) Pgm him well or let him change his
environment and then audit him) or (5) look into his folder to see who
audited him on so many chains when, with no real erasure or EP. (6) You use
repair lists (like L4BRA, L1C, etc.) and other usual action. On (7) you
make the pc get some rest and if he can't, make him go for a walk away
until he is tired and then walk back and get some sleep.
All these really add up to keyed-in or unflat engram chains. Whether
the pc can handle them depends on repair and the usual.
Of all these the past auditing without attaining EP on engram chains
(whether done in Dianetics or Scientology) is a usual reason for a much
audited pc to have a high TA.
The answers to any high TA that won't come down and to any pc who
continually arrives at Examiner after an F/N VGI session end with his TA UP
are:
A. Faulty auditing not letting pc go to full Dn EP when running
engrams.
B. A false Auditing Report (PR type report meaning promoting
instead of auditing).
C. Too many engram chains in past restim by life or auditing.
D. False TA or inoperable meter.
It is usual to do a PICTURE AND MASSES REMEDY to find and handle
restimulated engram chains which are causing the TA to be high. This is
done after the pc has had a Drug Rundown as unhandled drugs can also cause
a TA to be high (see HCOB 24 July 78 DIANETIC REMEDIES).
CHRONIC SOMATIC
A pc who has a chronic somatic would get programmed like this:
1. Repair (Progress) Pgm as necessary until pc feeling better.
2. Original Assessment Sheet, with its full handling per New Era
Dianetics Series 2, FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE and New Era Dianetics
Series 8, DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON.
3. Continue with the New Era Dianetics Full Pc Program, taking
each step to full completion.
IF the Dianetic auditing is standard and to Dianetic EP (erasure, F/N,
cognition, postulate if not included in the cognition, VGIs) you will see
this pattern at the Examiner . . .
First few sessions
TA 4.0 or more at Exam. Doubtful GIs.
Next few
TA 3.75 and blowing down to 3.25 at Exam. GIs.
Next few
TA 3.75 BD to F/N at Exam. GIs to VGIs.
Next two or three
TA 3.5 BD to F/N at Exams. VGIs.
Finally
TA 2.5 F/N VGIs at the Examiner.
That's what you would expect to see if the auditing was standard, if the
case was straightened out of past flubs in the repair step. Errors such as
running unreading items or firefights caused by out TRs or false auditing
reports or Dn EP not reached at session end or pc needing ruds put in at
session starts would prevent this pattern from happening at the Examiner's.
So if the pattern doesn't happen you know the auditing is goofy or
something is out which had better be found. One pc for instance had a huge
W/H of having a disease and was audited over it for 2 years = auditing over
a W/H and PTP = no case gain. Silly pc. But also a very dull C/S not to
alert to some outness there and find it. Another pc had a high TA and the
fault was just that she never got any auditing at all! So they kept
operating on her! Somebody didn't know Dianetics and auditing was for USE.
HIGH TA AND ILLNESS
Pcs with high TAs feel ill and get ill.
No use to elaborate on that. It's just a fact and is THE fact about pcs
who get ill. So maybe you see why this HCOB is important!
LOW TA AT EXAM
Pcs with low TAs are more or less in apathy.
If it F/N VGIs at session end and is low at Exam (like 1.9) (OR if it
went low in session and didn't F/N), then the pc is:
(a) overwhelmed and needs auditing and Life Repair
(b) can have been run on a flat or unreading item that invalidated
his former win.
Example: Pc listed on an unreading list few sessions later worrying
about it and coming to Exam with low TA. Repair is the answer. Low TA pcs
need a Life Repair also.
The NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES tech, fully and correctly applied, will
handle all aspects of the chronic somatic. See HCOB 22 June 78, New Era
Dianetics Series 2, FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1970
SH's
AOs Only
Solo C/S Hat SOLO ASSISTS
Adv Cses Super
It is absolutely forbidden to assign 2-way comm actions as "Solo."
Example: An out-point list, an assessment list, listing for items, 2WC
on case etc.
PROGRESS AND ADVANCE ACTIONS may not be assigned by a Solo C/S to be
done Solo.
A Solo auditor may not do these actions.
Dianetics R3R may not be attempted in Solo auditing.
The reasons for this are too obvious to be given stress.
I have never seen a Solo auditor do anything but louse himself up on
these actions. Here and there somebody might have gotten away with it. But
I have seen too many cases loused up this way to condone it as anything but
squirrel Solo.
A Solo auditor can fly ruds and engage in a BPC L1 or L7 WHILE AUDITING
PROPER SOLO ACTIONS, and he can of course do the standard Solo actions for
the grade.
But doing L7, L1B etc. as general REPAIR actions is for the dickey
birds.
There ARE NO SOLO REPAIR OR PROGRESS OR RETURN OR ADVANCE PROGRAMS .
LRH:rr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1970R
REVISED 7 JULY 1978
Remimeo (Revisions in this type style)
Dn Checksheet
Class III
Class VIII C/S Series 18R
C/S Checksheet
CHRONIC SOMATIC,
DIANETIC HANDLING OF
The full Dianetic handling of the pc who has a chronic somatic is given
in the HCOB C/S Series 15 of 16 August 1970R, "Getting the F/N to
Examiner."
This HCOB calls the fact to attention. It could get overlooked or be
hard to find again as the title of HCOB 16 August does not indicate it
directly.
Also see New Era Dianetics Series 1-18.
LRH:sb.rd.lfg L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1970,1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MARCH 1971R
REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Remimeo
(Revised to align with New Era Dianetics tech)
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 29R
CASE ACTIONS, OFF LINE
A C/S can be plagued by off-line case actions of which he is not
informed.
The existence of these can wreck his carefully laid out programs and
make a case appear incomprehensible.
Thus it is up to a C/S to suspect and find these where a case isn't
responding normally in auditing.
1. LIFE KNOCKING RUDS OUT FASTER THAN THEY CAN BE AUDITED IN.
Schedule sessions closer together and give very long sessions so life
hasn't a chance to interfere. Can go as far as requiring person via the D
of P to stay in a hotel away from the area of enturbulation or not
associate until case is audited up high enough.
Shows up most drastically in Interiorization intensives where no ruds
can be run unless the RD is complete. Thus Int has to be done in one
session, with the 2WC IntExt the next day.
2. PC PHYSICALLY ILL BEFORE NEXT SESSION AND AUDITING OF A MAJOR ACTION
BEING DONE ON A SICK PC WHO SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER C/S ENTIRELY.
Happens when delayed or late new Exam Reports don't get into folder
before C/Sing it. Ginger up exam routing.
Happens when auditors are not alert to the pc's illness and audit
anyway. Make auditors not audit and report at once sick pcs.
Pcs hiding general illness may show up as no case gain. Answer is to
get a full medical exam.
3. SELF-AUDITING.
Detected by no lasting gain. Hi-Lo TA Assessment will show it up.
Two-way comm on when they began to self-audit (usually auditor scarcity
or some introverting shock).
4. COFFEE SHOP AUDITING.
Meterless fool around, often by students, stirring up cases.
Forbid it in an area.
5. TOUCH AND CONTACT ASSISTS INTERRUPTING A GENERAL COURSE OF AUDITING,
OFTEN TO NO F/N.
Make all such assists be done on a worksheet and make it mandatory to take
the pc to an Examiner afterwards.
W/S and Exam Rpt then appear in folder.
The C/S can then get in the other actions (ruds, S & D, HCOB 24 July
69R) on the injured pc.
6. STUDY RUNDOWNS.
An illegal and offbeat line can occur when auditing out misunderstoods
in study or "Management Word Rundown" or such occurs in the middle of a
general auditing program.
Require that C/S okay is required.
Get such done at the START of courses and BEFORE a major auditing cycle
is begun. Enforce this hard as the other answer that will be taken will be
to do it at the end of the cycle and wreck major auditing program results.
7. ILLEGAL PATCH-UPS.
Sometimes all through an intensive there is another auditor unknown to
the C/S who 2WCs the pc or audits the pc who is complaining to him or her.
Shows up in the Hi-Lo TA Assessment.
Forbid it.
8. PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT THEIR CASES.
Past life reality is often badly hurt by people who talk about being
Napoleon, Caesar and God. This makes "past lives" an unreal subject by bad
comparison.
Restimulative material is sometimes used to "push someone's buttons."
Bullbait that uses actual processes or implants should be stamped out
hard.
9. ADVANCED COURSE MATERIAL INSECURITY.
I have seen several cases wrecked by careless storage of Ad Course
materials where lower levels could get at them.
One notable case was a suppressive who got hold of Ad Course materials
and chanted them at his wife to drive her insane. She recovered eventually.
He didn't.
When a C/S gets a whiff of upper level materials on a lower level pc
worksheet he should make an ethics matter of it and get it traced.
10. ILLEGAL DRUG USE.
A pc who suddenly relapses onto drugs or who has a long drug history
can cause a case to look very very odd. The TA flies up. The case, running
okay, suddenly ceases to run.
Addicts can come off it if given full drug handling per New Era
Dianetics Series 9 DRUG HANDLING.
LRH:mes.rd.ldv L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 1971RA
Remimeo
REVISED 25 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
DIANETIC ERASURE
There are several corny stunts that can occur in Dianetics, any of
which will add up to no erasure.
1. Trying to run an item that didn't read on being given or when being
called. As the chain is not charged it will be hard if not impossible
to run. Instant F/N and BD items are of course the very best and almost
always erase very easily.
2. Starting a new session with a new item with the TA way way up. To
play it safe in Dianetic auditing (it can be handled in Scientology)
the Dianetic auditor who starts a session and a new action at the same
time with the TA high is very foolish. It may not be high on what the
auditor is now newly trying to run. The correct action is not to start
the session. Just end off with no auditing done.
The pc is ill or is having trouble in life. If you were running a
chain in the last session and continue it in the next, disregard the
high TA. A way to get around this is get some new items from the high
TA pc and take one that blows down well and you can probably bring it
off. Safest is don't audit a high TA pc unless to repair an unflat
chain (or to run Interiorization RD). This rule is variable. But you
should know it is risky to audit a new item taken from an earlier list
when the pc comes into session with a high TA as it may not be high on
what you are about to run and so you may get no F/N and erasure. The
only remedy is to get new items and choose a BD one (or to turn the pc
over to a Scientology auditor to assess a Hi-Lo TA list and handle).
3. Narratives are too often just run through once or twice and
abandoned. This leaves the incident still charged and affecting the pc.
(A narrative item describes only one possible incident, i.e. "dropping
an ironing board on my foot" = no chain.) A narrative needs to be run
and run and run on that one incident. You run the incident narrative to
erasure and only go earlier similar if it starts to grind very badly.
You run the incident to EP.
4. Running a pc who has exteriorized in auditing on something other than
an Interiorization RD will produce a high TA and no F/N and erasure in
the session. After Int RD has been run anything can be run.
5. Probably the WORST blunder is failing to ask for DEF again when the
pc says, "It's erased" but the TA is still high. This is really a corny
error. TA 4.9.
Pc says, "It's erased! All blank now," and the auditor fails to ask
DEF once more. There is a moment when the pc's NOT-IS of the picture
squeezes it into invisibility. The mass of it is still there. It takes
just one or two more passes through to get the BD, F/N, postulate and
VGIs (which is the erasure). It's up to the auditor not to let the pc
go without that additional DEF, which will then bring the BD, F/N,
postulate off and VGIs.
This error is more common than one would think.
6. Of course, not asking for an earlier incident mentioning the
same item will also cause a grind and no erasure. When the item isn't
also mentioned in the command the pc can jump chains. And if the
earlier beginning is not asked for at all on basic, when there is one,
or on narratives, of course there will be no erasure.
7. Auditing a pc under protest will cause the TA to stay up and no F/N
and erasure.
8. Ending off a chain or engram at the first sight of an F/N and then
wondering why . . . no postulate came off.
The skilled Dianetic auditor knows these things cold and does not make
these errors. Thus he gets his end of session erasure and F/N regularly and
gets F/N at the Examiner as well when the case has had a few sessions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes.rd.rb .kjm
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1971
Remimeo REISSUED 13 JANUARY 1975
All Auditors REISSUED 6 NOVEMBER 1976
C/Ses
C/S Series 33RA-1
TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS
LAW: WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THE FOUR FLOWS OF AN ITEM OR GRADE ARE LEFT
UNRUN, WHEN USED IN LATER PROCESSES THE EARLIER UNRUN ONES RESTIMULATE AND
MAKE MASS.
This tells you that high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness can come
from bypassed flows.
BYPASSED FLOWS
Example: Dianetic Singles have been run on 7 items. Now the auditor
begins to run new items Triple without running Triple on the already run
items. The result will be 7 unrun Flow 2s and 7 unrun Flow 3s. These will
restimulate and form mass and bypassed charge.
Example: Now let us say all 7 previous items have been run Triple. And
the auditor now runs a new item Quadruple. This leaves 7 unrun Zero chains.
These can restimulate and form mass and bypassed charge.
Example: Now let us say that Dianetics was all run Single and grades
were run Triple. This will restimulate the Dn chains F2 and F3.
Example: Let us say that Dianetics and Scientology grades were all run
Triple. An Interiorization Rundown is now run Quad. This will throw all
Dianetic and Scientology unrun Flow Zeros into restimulation and give
bypassed charge.
ANY LATER GRADE RUN WITH MORE FLOWS THAN USED IN EARLIER ACTIONS CAN
THROW THE EARLIER UNFLAT FLOWS INTO RESTIM, PILE UP MASS GIVING HIGH TA AND
BPC GIVING ARC BREAKS.
REPAIR
The more the condition is repaired by L1C, L4BR etc. etc., the worse
the mass gets.
SOURCE OF HIGH TA
Thus high TAs have three principal sources:
(1) Overruns
(2) Auditing past exterior
(3) Earlier unrun flows restimulated by those flows used in later
actions.
There are other minor ones such as drug background, illness etc. as per
Hi-Lo TA Assessment.
REHABS
One must NOT recklessly or continuously rehab a past major action. This
causes overrun. The thetan is placed at the end of the incidents not yet in
restimulation or run and the bank gets more solid.
MASSY THETANS
The whole trick of this universe is contained in thetans copying or
picturing incidents and then getting stuck in the later portion of them.
"Incidents" is the keynote. A thetan is incident hungry.
This is what traps him.
For some reason he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase
them. The later he is in incidents and the later he is on the track the
more solid he is.
This also applies to the "auditing time track."
By omitting things like flows on the auditing time track, the thetan
thus becomes massy.
The whole theory of the Interiorization Remedy is based on having gone
out (later) after he went in (earlier). So exteriorizing can stick him.
(People buy the Int RD to exteriorize but the remedy is only done to permit
further auditing. They Ext of course when the bank is handled.)
When flows of items are bypassed and then later restimulated by
auditing them, mass occurs.
GETTING IN ALL FLOWS
When doing additional flows on earlier items or processes one must also
check or rehab those flows marked as run to F/N in worksheets.
This again will leave unflat flows and BPC unless it is (lone.
And if it is overdone it will raise the TA by overrun.
So if one had a case that had Single Dianetics and was later run on
Triple for new items (but the Singles not done into Triple) one would have
to RUN FIRST the missing unrun flow or flows if they read and then check
the first Single F1 for flatness, then check other previously run flows.
The rule is run the previously unrun one or ones first if they read to
get charge off, then verify or run the ones listed as run already.
Then one would do the same for the next item. Run the previously unrun
flow or flows if they read and then verify or run those listed as already
run to be sure they F/N.
All items, in chronological sequence, and all processes, would have to
be run Quad.
IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME NOW TO RUN IN ONLY TRIPLES.
Whether you have the Quad commands or not they are easy to figure out
as you are only missing the Zero flow, self to self.
So all C/Ses and auditing actions are "Rehab or Run F1, F2, F3, F0 if
they read" when getting in all flows on things run to date.
HIGH TA
When you are sure an Int RD has been done correctly and its 2WC went
F/N and the TA later goes high, you check the Int RD. That is the most
usual reason. This simple action is amazingly subject to flubs.
If the TA goes high later you can do a C/S Series 53 or a Hi-Lo TA
Assessment and handle.
If the TA is still high or low, you had better check the state of
flows. Were more flows run on later actions than were run on earlier
actions?
If so, your pc has felt massy, sometimes even ill.
The right action is to get in all flows from the beginning. And do it
Quad. Bring all his auditing up to Quad.
(If his folder is not available, he has kind of had it. I know of no
way, at this writing, to recover lost Dn items but will have to work
something out.)
NOT IN TROUBLE
If the pc is not in trouble, his best bet is to get on up the grades to
Expanded OT III.
IN TROUBLE
If he is massy and is having trouble the best bet is to:
(1) Be totally sure of his Int RD.
(2) Check O/Rs particularly of a major grade twice or bypassed
F/Ns, locate and indicate them.
(3) FES, list the items and grades and do a Full Flow action from
the beginning of his auditing, raising them all to Quadruple.
RUNNING ZERO FLOWS
The Zero flow in Dianetics is a bit strange. It can be done by full R3R
BUT it often depends on the decision the pc made and may F/N very suddenly.
It is easily overrun and can be very fast.
A pc can be gotten into trouble on Zero flows if the auditor is slow
and is not alert to his meter and misses the F/N and gives R3R commands
after the flow has blown .
REHAB OR RUN
The auditor getting in Zero flows can also ARC Brk the pc by failing to
verify if the previously run flows are flat. All the auditor wants is to
see them F/N on the command. If they don't he runs them.
Sometimes when he has "run them" again he finds they are being overrun
or run twice and has to rehab them by finding this out. The pc sometimes
doesn't know until he actually starts to run them. Then he finds they are
already run. The clue to this is a climbing TA. If the TA goes up, get off
that flow and rehab it.
Example: Pc at first thinks "Pain in shoulder" F2 was never run. Starts
to run it. TA goes up. Auditor must pull him off of it by finding out if it
is being run twice and rehab it to F/N.
The moral in all these reruns is don't firefight, keep an L1C List and
an L3RD List handy and use them.
RESULTS
The results of straightening up the Int-Ext RD, rehabbing O/Rs and
putting in ALL FLOWS on a pc are fantastic.
Getting an All Flows Rundown done correctly gives one all the latent
gain the pc
has been begging for.
So send to Cramming all C/Ses and auditors who flub.
Program it right.
C/S it right.
Audit it right.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
W/O Ron Shafran
CS-4
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1971, 1975, 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCOB was reissued to correct the signature which is the only change.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1971RC
Remimeo
REVISED 14 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
IMPORTANT
L3RF
DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST
This list includes the most frequent Dianetic errors.
A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a
chain of incidents.
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as
it can have different or several errors.
REMEMBER TO CLEAR EACH WORD ON THIS LIST. IF A QUESTION READS AND THE
PC SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it
and take it as it read on a misunderstood not on a fact).
RUNNING PCS ON DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN CS-1
INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION.
TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY FULL REPAIR OF IT PER THE INSTRUCTIONS .
1. WAS THERE AN EARLIER SIMILAR INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it. Run the chain to full EP.
2. WAS THERE NO EARLIER SIMILAR INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it. Determine if the chain erased or if the last incident
needs to be run through again. Complete the chain to full EP by
indication or by running it to full EP. Scn handling would include
Date/Locate if needed.
3. WAS THERE AN EARLIER BEGINNING? _________
Indicate it. Handle with R3RA and complete the chain to full EP.
4. WAS THERE NO EARLIER BEGINNING? _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain to full EP R3RA DEF on last incident
if unflat.
5. WAS AN F/N INDICATED TOO SOON? _________
Indicate it. Run the last incident (or chain) to full EP.
6. DID THE AUDITOR STOP JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS AN F/N? _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain to full EP using commands DEF on the
last incident run.
7. WAS AN F/N INDICATED TOO LATE? _________
Indicate it. Get off the postulate made at the time of the incident.
Indicate the overrun.(Scn handling would include D/L if needed.) . . .
Then, if the pc jumped to another chain, get last incident pc ran on
the jumped-to chain and do an L3RF on it.
8. WAS THE POSTULATE BYPASSED? _________
Indicate. Get the postulate. Indicate that the chain was overrun.
(Scn handling would include a D/L if necessary.) If pc jumped chains,
handle as above.
9. HAS THE INCIDENT ERASED? _________
Indicate. Get the postulate made at the time of the incident.
Indicate the overrun. (If any difficulty, Scn handling would include a
D/L.)
10. WAS AN F/N NOT INDICATED AT ALL? _________
Indicate. Get off the postulate if not already given. Indicate the
overrun. (D/L by Scn auditor if necessary.) If jumped chains, handle as
in 7.
11. WAS THERE NO CHARGE ON THE ITEM IN THE FIRST PLACE? _________
Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run. Scn handling would
include D/L if necessary.
12. DID YOU JUMP CHAINS? _________
Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain. Find out if it erased
and get the postulate if not previously given. Indicate the overrun, or
run the chain to full EP. Then locate last incident pc ran on the chain
he jumped to. As this has now been restimulated but not run, do an L3RF
on it. Scn handling would include D/L if necessary.
13. DID YOU JUMP FLOWS? _________
Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain and take it to full EP
using commands DEF. If necessary and the pc is still upset about the
other flow, do an L3RF on it.
14. WERE THERE FLUBBED COMMANDS? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
15. DID THE AUDITOR GOOF ON A SEQUENCE OF COMMANDS? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
16. DID YOU NOT HAVE A COMMAND? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
17. DID YOU HAVE A MISUNDERSTOOD ON THE COMMAND? _________
Find it and clear it.
18. SHOULD THE INCIDENT BE RUN THROUGH ONE MORE TIME? _________
Indicate it. R3RA DEF on the incident, run chain to full EP.
19. TOO LATE ON THE CHAIN? _________
Indicate it. Get the earlier similar incident and complete the chain
with R3RA to full EP.
20. WAS A CHAIN NOT COMPLETED? _________
Indicate it. DEF on the incident, run chain to full EP.
21. INCIDENT GONE MORE SOLID? _________
Indicate it. Check for earlier incident or earlier beginning and
complete the chain to full EP.
22. WAS AN INCIDENT SKIPPED? _________
Indicate it. Find out what it was, run it and complete the chain to
full EP.
23. WAS AN INCIDENT LEFT TOO HEAVILY CHARGED? _________
Indicate it. Find out what it was, run it through again. Complete the
chain to full EP.
24. DID YOU SAY SOMETHING WAS ERASED JUST BECAUSE
YOU WERE TIRED OF RUNNING IT? _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain to full EP with R3RA DEF on the last
incident run.
25. STOPPED RUNNING AN INCIDENT THAT WAS ERASING? _________
Indicate it. DEF on the incident and erase it. Get full EP.
26. WENT PAST BASIC ON A CHAIN? _________
Indicate it. Get full EP. Then, if pc jumped to another chain, get
last incident pc ran on the jumped-to chain and do an L3RF on it. Scn
handling would include D/L if necessary.
27. WAS AN EARLIER MISRUN INCIDENT RESTIMULATED? _________
Indicate it. Find out what it was and do an L3RF on it.
28. DID TWO OR MORE INCIDENTS GET CONFUSED? _________
Indicate it, sort it out with an L3RF on it.
29. WAS AN IMPLANT RESTIMULATED? _________
Indicate it. If no joy do an L3RF on the time of the restimulation.
30. WAS THE INCIDENT REALLY AN IMPLANT? _________
Indicate it. If necessary do an L3RF on it. Scn handling would
include D/L if needed.
31. WRONG ITEM? _________
Indicate it was a wrong item and that all other actions connected
with it were wrong. If it is from an L&N list or if any question or
difficulty, turn the pc over to a Scientology auditor who is classed to
do an L4BRA.
32. NOT YOUR ITEM? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
33. NOT YOUR INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L3RF if any trouble.
34. DID THE PREASSESSMENT ITEM GOTTEN HAVE NO CHARGE ON IT? _________
Indicate the item was uncharged and should not have been taken up and
all items connected with it should not have been run. (Scn handling
would include D/L if necessary.)
35. WAS THERE ANOTHER PREASSESSMENT ITEM THAT SHOULD HAVE READ?
_________
Get what it was and note its read as the pc gives it. Find out if the
preassessment item taken up is uncharged. If so handle as above. If
not, continue with the action you are on to EP and handle the new item
given in its order.
36. WAS THE ORIGINAL ITEM ALREADY HANDLED? _________
Indicate that the original item was already handled and that items
connected with it should not have been run. (Son handling would include
a D/L if necessary.)
37. (OMIT WHEN RUNNING DRUGS)
WAS THERE NO INTEREST IN RUNNING AN ITEM? _________
Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run. Scn handling would
include D/L if needed.
38. WAS THE SAME THING RUN TWICE? _________
Indicate it. Spot the first erasure, indicate the overrun. Scn
handling would include D/L if needed.
39. WAS THERE A WRONG DATE? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and run the incident (if unflat)
and chain to full EP.
40. WAS THERE NO DATE FOR THE INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it. Get the date and run the incident (if unflat) and chain
to full EP.
41. WAS IT A FALSE DATE? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and run the incident (if unflat)
and any chain to full EP.
42. WAS THERE AN INCORRECT DURATION? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and run the incident (if
unflat) and any chain to full EP.
43. WAS NO DURATION FOUND FOR THE INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it. Get the duration and run the incident (if unflat) and
any chain to full EP.
44. WAS THERE A FALSE DURATION? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and run the incident (if
unflat) and any chain to full EP.
45. DID YOU RESENT DURATIONS? _________
Indicate it. E/S to F/N. Run the incident (if unflat) and any chain
to full EP.
46. WAS AN EARLIER DIANETIC UPSET RESTIMULATED? _________
Locate what it was, indicate it. Sort out with an L3RF if necessary.
47. WAS AN EARLIER ARC BREAK ON ENGRAMS RESTIMULATED ? _________
Indicate it. Sort it out with an L3RF.
48. WAS THERE AN ARC BREAK IN THE INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it. Run the incident, if unflat, to full EP.
49. WERE YOU PROTESTING? _________
Indicate it, clean it up E/S to F/N.
50. DID THE AUDITOR DEMAND MORE THAN YOU COULD SEE? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. If any difficulty, turn the pc over to a
Scientology auditor classed to do an L1C if necessary.
51. DID THE AUDITOR REFUSE TO ACCEPT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. If any difficulty, turn the pc over to a
Scientology auditor classed to do an L1C as necessary.
52. WERE YOU PREVENTED FROM RUNNING AN INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Run the incident (if unflat) to full EP. If
any difficulty turn the pc over to a Scientology auditor classed to do
an L1C on it.
53. DID THE AUDITOR SIMPLY STOP GIVING COMMANDS? _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain by running the last incident found
DEF to full EP.
54. WAS A COGNITION INTERRUPTED? _________
Indicate it.... Get the cognition and any postulate connected with
it. (if any difficulty at this point turn pc over to a Scientology
auditor for an L1C.) Continue chain if unflat, or indicate the overrun.
55. WAS THERE A POSTULATE THAT WAS NOT EXPRESSED? _________
Indicate it.... Get the postulate and indicate the overrun. (Scn
handling would include L1C or D/L if needed.)
56. WERE YOU DISTRACTED WHILE RUNNING AN INCIDENT? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Run the incident (if unflat) and any chain
to full EP. If any difficulty, turn pc over to a classed Scientology
auditor for L1C.
57. WERE YOU AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? _________
PROBLEM? _________
WITHHOLD? _________
Indicate it. If you are trained to do so, handle the out rud. If not,
turn the pc over to a Scientology auditor classed to handle out ruds.
Do not pull W/Hs before the engram or chain is repaired or it will mush
engrams.
58. WERE YOU HELD UP BY THE AUDITOR? _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
59. WAS AN ITEM SUPPRESSED? _________
Indicate it. Get the Suppress off E/S to F/N, then run the item and
any chain to full EP.
60. WAS AN ITEM INVALIDATED? _________
Indicate it. Get the Inval off E/S to F/N, then run the item and any
chain to full EP.
61. WAS AN ITEM ABANDONED? _________
Indicate it, get the item back and run the item and any chain to full
EP.
62. WAS A CHAIN ABANDONED? _________
Indicate it, get the chain back and run to full EP.
63. WAS THE ITEM ORIGINALLY MISWORDED? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Handle to
full EP if unflat.
64. WAS THE WORDING OF THE ITEM CHANGED? _________
Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Run it (if
unflat) to full EP.
65. WERE YOU RUNNING AN ITEM THAT WAS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE ASSESSED?
_________
Indicate it. Get the item the pc was actually running, handle to full
EP. Then L3RF on the item actually assessed.
66. STUCK PICTURE? _________
Indicate it. Do an L3RF on it. You can also unstick it by having him
recall a time before it and a time after it.
67. ALL BLACK? _________
Spot the black field or picture. Get the correct duration. If no go,
L3RF on it.
68. INVISIBLE? _________
Spot the invisible field or picture. L3RF on it.
69. CONSTANTLY CHANGING PICTURES? _________
Indicate there was a misassessment and a wrong item was taken off the
list. Get the correct item and run it, or L3RF on that session.
70. WHEN YOU SAID IT WAS ERASED DID IT STILL HAVE A MASS? _________
Indicate it. DEF, checking for earlier beginning, run to erasure and
full EP. If necessary do an L3RF on it.
71. WAS THERE A PERSISTENT MASS? _________
L3RF on it.
72. WAS THERE TROUBLE WITH A PRESSURE ITEM OR PRESSURE ON AN ITEM?
_________
L3RF on it.
73. DID YOU GO EXTERIOR? _________
Indicate it. Handle if you are a Scientology auditor. Turn the pc
over to a Scientology auditor for a full Int RD or become a classed
Scientology auditor and handle.
74. WAS YOUR INT RD MESSED UP? _________
Indicate it. Handle if you are a Scientology auditor. If not, turn
the pc over to a Scientology auditor to get his Int RD straightened
out, or get trained as a classed Scientology auditor and handle.
75. WERE YOU AUDITED OVER DRUGS, MEDICINE OR ALCOHOL? _________
Indicate it. L3RF on that time, then verify all chains to ensure they
erased. Note for C/S attention to verify if Objectives and all other
points of full drug handling have been done.
76. WAS A PAST DEATH RESTIMULATED? _________
Indicate it. If it doesn't blow run it out Narrative Secondary R3RA.
77. DID YOU ATTAIN SOME STATE AND IT WAS INVALIDATED? _________
Indicate it. Return folder to C/S for handling.
78. DID YOU GO CLEAR AND NOBODY WOULD LET YOU DECLARE? _________
Indicate it. Return folder to C/S for handling.
79. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE? _________
Indicate it. Continue the action you were on.
80. WAS THIS LIST UNNECESSARY? _________
Indicate it. If it doesn't F/N turn the pc over to a Scientology
auditor for a rehab or become a Scientology auditor to handle.
81. HAS THE REAL REASON BEEN MISSED? _________
Indicate it. Locate the real reason and handle.
82. WAS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
Locate what it is and sort it out.
LRH:ldv.dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971, 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1971RC
REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
Class VIII (Revisions in this type style)
Dn Checksheet (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Int-Ext Checksheet
C/S Series 36RC
DIANETICS
(Applies also to Int-Ext Rundown)
(Ref HCOB 4 Apr 71RA, C/S Series 32RA,
and HCOB 5 Apr 71RA, C/S Series 33RA)
TRs
TR Zero exists so an auditor is not ducking the session but can sit
there relaxed, doing his job.
TR One must be done so the pc can hear and understand the auditor
(without blowing the pc's head off either).
TR Two must be done so that the pc gets acknowledged. This can be so
corrupted that the auditor doesn't ack at all but gives the pc meter reads!
Instead of acks! Or keeps saying, "I didn't understand you," etc.
TR Three basically existed so that the auditor would continue to give
the pc commands and not squirrel off or pack up with total silence.
TR Four exists so that the pc's origins are accepted and not Qed and
Aed with or invalidated.
And, surprise, surprise, TRs are for use in the session itself, not
just a drill. They are how one runs a session.
An auditor can miss by calling "F/Ns" with high or low TA. And one
never feeds meter data to the pc: "That read," "That didn't read," "That
blew down," just must not exist in session patter. "Thank you. That F/Ned,"
is as far as an auditor goes. And that's the end of the cycle and says so.
Erasure can be overlooked by an auditor. In Dianetics this fault is
fatal.
Auditor's Code must be in on all points and particularly invalidation.
Pc says, "That's so and so." An auditor who says, "I'm sorry. You are
wrong," or any other invalidation is going to wreck a pc's case. A full
knowledge of the Auditor's Code and actually applying it saves endless
troubles. It is an auditing TOOL, not just a nice idea.
REHABBING CHAINS
One rehabs a Dianetic chain that, according to a previous worksheet,
erased by saying, "According to session records (flow direction) (item)
erased." That's all. One does not say, "Did the chain giving others a
headache erase?" One does not run it again to find out. One does not run a
single command "to see if it F/Ns again." One can say, "Do you agree that
the chain giving another a headache erased?" But the more you ask the pc to
look for an erased chain the more messed up things will get. It isn't
there. But the auditor by his action can imply it should be there or might
be there. A totally wrong
approach would be "Look around your bank and see if what isn't there any
more isn't there."
Dianetics is NOT Scientology. A Dianetic chain is not a release. If you
try to use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic chain, you have had it. It
isn't a "release" (which is a key-out). A Dianetic chain is an erasure. You
can't rehab erasures with "How many times?", etc.
The test of this is the doing. If you try to use Scn rehab on Dianetic
chains, the PC MIGHT TRY TO FIND SOMETHING. This causes him to key-in other
unrun or similar items.
It is a dangerous action at best to try to handle old erased chains.
The best you can do is to tell the pc what the old W/S said. If no W/S
exists leave the already erased flows alone!
FLUBBED CHAINS
Many times, a Folder Error Summary will give a flubbed chain and then
fail to note it was repaired in the next session!
A C/S and auditor would have been pretty irresponsible to just go on
auditing past flubbed chains.
The only safe way to handle some previous flubbed chain is to:
(a) Verify in the folder if it was repaired.
(b) If still unrepaired assess the L3RE on it and handle according
to the L3RE.
L3RE
Using the new L3RE (HCOB 11 Apr 71 RB) is a Dianetic action.
A Scientology auditor erroneously can try to use it as a two-way comm
type of list. If a chain needed one more DEF, then two-way comm on it with
no DEF is not going to complete it.
L3RE has its own directions. Questions not marked with directions are
used to indicate the fact. This can amount to two-way comm as the pc chews
it over. But L3RE where marked is handled by Dianetics actions. Look over
the list and its directions for each question and you will see that some
are given directions that are NOT 2WC.
Example: "Earlier beginning" reads. You can't just say, "The incident
had an earlier beginning," and you can't say, "Tell me about the earlier
beginning." The pc will go up the wall. There'll be no erasure. You have to
use R3M and get him to the earlier beginning and then run it and if it
still doesn't erase, get him to an earlier similar and erase that.
L3RE is a Dianetics list. It is not a Scientology list that is cleared
each question to F/N by 2-way comm.
OVERRUN
Overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA.
If as you seek to get in Full Flow Dianetics (Ref: HCOB 7 Mar 71R Rev
25 July 78 C/S Series 28RA-1R USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS. HCOB 4 Apr 71-1RA
Rev 25 July 78 C/S Series 32RA-1RA USE OF QUAD DIANETICS. HCOB 5 Apr 71
Reissued 13 Jan 75 C/S Series 33R-1 TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS (page 380 Tech
Vol VIII) ) the pc's TA begins to average higher, overrun is occurring.
Example: While doing FFD pc's TA has been riding at 2.2 and F/Ns. After a
new FFD action it begins to ride at 2.5 and F/Ns. Something is being
overrun. Find it and indicate it. And cease to stir the bank up so much!
The fault is going over items already run.
In doing a Full Flow Table you often find that the same or similar have
been run in the past.
Sometimes you find that a previous attempt to run the item a second or
third time has resulted in an ARC break, the reason for which was never
detected.
The right action is to note the session date it was first run and just
tell the pc, "Feeling surprised was run three times. On (first date it was
erased) it was erased. When later run it was an overrun." This tends to
blow the later charge laid in by trying to run the same item again.
It sounds so strange that erased chains can be overrun. But it is true.
What happens is that pcs try to cooperate and put something there.
FIREFIGHTS
The action of a quarrel between an auditor and a pc is called a
firefight.
Restimulating earlier unrun engrams or overrunning chains upsets a pc.
The best action, as soon as a pc is disturbed, is to do an L3RE fast and
handle what reads the way it should be handled according to the L3RE.
The wrong way is to argue or try to go on.
The pc does NOT know what it is. He just feels awful. He tries to
guess. He will ARC Brk or get sad if the auditor continues.
The correct action is an L3RE.
L1C is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC Brk. L3RE is.
If the pc remains ARC broken, try L3RE again, particularly the whole
L3RE.
A Scientology session would be handled with some other list (L1C,
L4BRA, etc.). A Dianetic session, including and especially FFD, is handled
with L3RE.
You NEVER prepcheck while doing Dianetics. This mushes up the engrams.
INTERIORIZATION
ALL these cautions apply as well to an Interiorization-Exteriorization
Rundown, when restim occurs one uses an L3RE quickly.
Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology, action.
SAFE ACTIONS
A fully genned-in auditor, well crammed, well drilled, well skilled,
can be trusted with Dianetics, Dianetic Quads and an Int-Ext RD. Auditors
not so handled can get pcs into serious trouble with these things.
A safe course is to use Quads on new, never audited before pcs.
Those begun on Quads use then only Quad flows.
C/S RESPONSIBILITY
Any trouble a C/S is running into comes from the factors of TRs,
metering, Code and incomplete or false auditors' reports.
If when I am C/Sing I ever find an auditor has omitted key session
actions or has falsified a report, I order that auditor not to Cramming but
a full retrain of the Hubbard New Era Dianetics Course right on up.
A C/S does not see these points. He can get the pc asked what the
auditor is doing or did. He can get sessions monitored. This helps him fill
this gap in his data.
It's what isn't in the auditor's report that is often the trouble.
Auditors omit what they said, omit the firefight, omit session alter-is in
their worksheets.
All this sticks the C/S's neck out for the axe of failure.
So particularly in FFD, Int-Ext and other such actions, a C/S has to
act to obtain confidence in the auditor's TRs, metering, Code use and
accurate worksheets.
RISK
In FFD, Int-Ext RD and Power, experience has proven that if the auditor
is not top grade, if the C/S is not alert, we put a pc at risk.
The USUAL is what keeps the pc safe.
A thorough study of his case, looking for obvious bugs (such as Int-Ext
RD done twice, the case a druggie but drug engrams never run, Int done but
its 2WC flubbed, to name a few serious ones), sending auditors to Cramming
for the slightest flub, insisting on standard TRs USED IN SESSION, good
metering, use of the Code, accurate and complete worksheets, use of
standard tech, all guarantee the safety and progress of the pc.
INTRODUCING FFD
FFD (like the Int-Ext RD) requires flawless C/Sing and auditing or the
case goes wrong.
When these actions were introduced they showed up any flaws in case
studying, TRs, metering, Code and worksheets.
There are two ways to handle. (a) Cancel FFD and Int-Ext as actions.
Obviously that is going backwards and is impossible. (b) Begin and continue
a serious, effective campaign in the org to (1) Train auditors better, (2)
Cram expertly on every flub, (3) Raise quality of TRs and metering.
As you can see, my approach is to improve quality of training, cramming
and delivery.
Please help me out in getting this in.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ts.rd.rb
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 APRIL 1971
Issue II
ALL AD COURSES
Include this and HCOB
26 Apr 71 Issue I in
Solo Course Packs and
on Checksheets.
SOLO COGNITIONS
In HCOB 26 April 1971 Issue I, the definitions and conditions in an
audited session are described.
The definition of in session also applies to Solo auditing.
If the Solo auditor is so all-thumbs with his papers, meters, platens
that they distract him from his own bank he is not likely to as-is or
cognite.
Recently, on Flag, we have taken failed OT IIIs and put them back
through a full heavy retrain on R6EW and then pushed them back up the line
with good success.
When a Solo auditor is also a rabbit (runs from everything including
his bank) he has no chance to overcome it if he is all thumbs with his
tools.
Requiring arduous, perfect drills on Solo metering and auditing actions
at R6EW level should occur before the pc sees any materials. He must first
and foremost be a Solo auditor, familiar with his meters and papers to such
a degree that they do not in any way distract him.
Only then can you add a bank to the scene.
A poor Solo auditor does not cognite as his attention is on the tools
not his bank.
Where the Solo auditor fails, he has not learned his tools. The remedy
is to make him learn them.
The bridge between OT II and III is sometimes a hard one. It may be
that an HDC Course is vital before the pre-OT can make this bridge.
The Solo auditor who "attests" rather than confront his bank probably
never learned to use his auditing tools in the first place. Then, adding
the bank as something to confront results in confusion.
Cognitions in Solo auditing depend upon the ability to use the tools of
auditing so well, they serve no distraction in Solo session.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes
Copyright � 1971
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JUNE 1971 RA
Issue I
Remimeo
REVISED 25 NOVEMBER 1976
RE-REVISED 28 MARCH 1977
(Re-Revised to correct typographical error on p. 147 in
"High TA & ARC Brks" section. No other changes.)
(Revision in this type style)
C/S Series 41RA
C/S TIPS
LISTS
Always C/S to correct lists first when lists are out or suspected to be
out.
Don't do ARC Brks first in a case of out lists as an out list can make
an ARC break that can't be handled by ARC Brk but only an L4BR.
On a GF when lists show up or overlists you should handle that (first
action in handling the GF) but also you must order an "L4BR Method 5 and
handle." Method 5 is the once through for assessment.
NO READ AUDITORS
When auditors can get no reads on things you get their:
(a) TRs checked to see if they can even be heard.
(b) Their metering checked for meter position on auditing table,
can they see meter, pc and write without shifting eyes?
And can they see pc's hands on the cans?
And was the meter turned on and charged and can an auditor work the
tone arm smoothly with his thumb?
(c) Does the auditor discount reads gotten on clearing commands?
(They are the reads.)
(d) Can the auditor read out a list and see the meter reads as a
coordinated action?
CRAMMING
Send auditors to Cramming on all flubs, insist they GO to Cramming,
insist Cramming calls them in and crams them and insist on a carbon copy of
the fact that cramming has been done.
All the hard work of C/Sing comes in when auditors are flubby.
It takes weeks to make an auditor after he has had a course and it's
only done by cram-cram-cram.
R-FACTORS
Never order an R-Factor that takes pc into future or past as he then won't
be in session. Example: C/Ses "R-Factor we are setting you up for
Dianetics." Promptly the pc is up ahead not in this session.
MIXING STARTS
There are many ways to start a session. Don't mix them.
It's "2WC what do you have your attention on?"
"Fly a rud if no F/N."
"Fly all ruds."
"2WC the TA down."
"Fly a rud or GF + 40 Method 5 and handle."
It's not a mixture of frantic efforts to get a TA down.
If the auditor can't on what the C/S says THE AUDITOR ENDS OFF.
Interiorization is undone or out, there may be list errors, there may
be overruns, but for sure it's a case for FOLDER STUDY, not for an auditor
C/Sing in the chair.
HIGH TA & ARC BRKS
Train your auditors NEVER TRY TO GET A TA DOWN FROM ABOVE 3.0 ON ARC
BREAKS.
LOW TA QUITS
Some auditors see a TA sink below 2.0 and then won't continue the 2WC
or process to get the TA back up.
"The TA sank so I quit" is a common auditor note.
Compare this: "The TA rose above 3.0 so I quit."
See? Doesn't make sense.
If a TA sinks below 2.0-and the auditor's TRs are good-the same action
will usually bring it up to 2.0 and F/N.
Come down hard on auditors who do this.
Get their TRs checked, make them continue.
EXAM F/Ns AFTER FLUBS
Pcs whose TAs are high in session or low in session get F/N at the
exams put the finger on the auditor. They are protesting or being
overwhelmed.
Always C/S "Examiner! Ask pc what auditor did in session."
Then you know it's the auditor or the case. The pc will say the auditor
was okay. So it's case. But usually when cases are puzzles there's weird
things going on with TRs.
Also the auditor may be noisy or laugh hard or is boisterous and being
"interesting."
C/S VIA
The C/S is handling cases on the via of an auditor.
If the auditor is perfect the C/S can handle the work out of the case.
If the auditor is not perfect in TRs, metering, Code, reports and doing the
C/S then the C/S is solving a factor unknown to him, not the pc's case.
So, be a perfect C/S. Demand perfect auditing. Cases fly.
HIGHER LEVELS
A C/S who assesses a pc to higher levels to solve lower ones is really
asking for a wreck.
It's always the earlier actions that are out.
Trying to cheat a case up to Grade II when he won't run on Grade I is
like trying to run the whole Grade Chart to cure a cold.
A pc can always be solved in or below where he is.
"Oh, we'll put him up a grade and cure his high TA" is like "He can't
pass kindergarten so we'll enroll him in college."
C/S EXPERTISE
A C/S has to know his auditing materials, HCOBs and texts MUCH better
than an auditor.
If a C/S is not being successful, get a retread on VI and VIII
materials.
A C/S also must be confident HE could crack the case as an auditor.
When a C/S is shaky on his materials then the world of auditing looks
very unstable.
The tech is very exact, very effective. If any errors existed in it
they've been corrected.
So the variables are the knowledge of the C/S, his discipline and
demands of auditors and the actions of the auditor.
If THESE are stable then the cases that come along are easy as can be.
The successful C/S knows his materials. If he wants to be even more
successful he keeps his study up.
Then he is steady and calm for he is totally certain.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.nt
Copyright � 1971, 1976, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JUNE 1971RA
Remimeo REVISED 14 JULY 1977
Tech & Qual (Reissued 27 September 1977
Supervisors to include revision date.)
Supervisor Courses CANCELS
Cramming Offs BTB 29 JUNE 1971 R
Word Clearers SAME TITLE
Word Clearing Series 7RA
IMPORTANT
STEPS TO SPEED
STUDENT PRODUCT FLOW
(For Supervisors and Tech Product Officers-
an LRH Despatch to Flag D of T)
If you consider each student who is tearing along successfully as an
F/Ning student, you would check anything that slowed the F/N.
Using dope-off as the detection of misunderstoods is running at a below
F/N level.
So if you consider that each student who is not 5.0 during study has a
misunderstood WORD (not phrase or idea or concept) you could drive up
velocity. Like auditing by slowed F/N instead of TA rise.
An estimation of tone level of the current students shows them at about
+ or 2.5. A very tight meter.
This could be remedied.
If I had this problem and a group of students at 2.5 I might approach
it this way:
Put a meter on the desk. Use "I am not auditing you" so not to in-
session them and start with the faster students. I would check "In your
study have you encountered any word you did not fully understand?" If I got
a read I'd send them to make up a list from the first P/L or tape and LOOK
THEM UP and USE THEM IN SENTENCES and take the next one. Any real BIs, I'd
send directly to a Word Clearing session.
I'd work on them until all their language was ironed out. Then I'd push
this back to a first few days action on the new ones-when I had the old
ones handled.
Now possibly this is in to some degree.
5,235 (points per week) is of course high. There are however lows that
take it down. By eliminating these as slows, this average would rise.
These are not orders. They are organization steps to speed product flow-
which can be done without shattering stops such as "all students to TRs."
Quality would rise as well as speed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
LRH:AH:lf.pat AVU I/A
Copyright � 1971, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 JULY 1971RB
Remimeo
REVISED 19 JULY 1978
RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 49RB
ASSISTS
There are three types of assists.
They are:
1. Contact Assist
2. Touch Assist
3. Dianetic Assist
They are quite different from each other.
They are VERY effective when properly done.
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears may be run on NED for OTs, Contact
Assists and Touch Assists. It is forbidden, however, to run Dianetics on
anyone who is Clear or above. (Ref: HCOB 12 Sept 78 DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON
CLEARS AND OTs.)
A preclear with a severe injury or illness can be run on all three and
SHOULD BE.
If the handling is very soon after injury, burns do not blister, breaks
heal in days, bruises vanish.
But to obtain such results it is necessary that the C/S and auditor or
auditor alone know and RESPECT the assist tech. It is too often a toss-off,
only one kind being done and then not to EP.
Every assist must end with an F/N (at Examiner or checked on a meter).
CONTACT ASSIST
Done off meter at the physical mest universe location of the injury. EP-
pain gone. Cog. F/N.
See BTB 9 Oct 67R, ASSISTS FOR INJURIES.
DIANETIC ASSIST
Done in session on the meter. EP pain gone. Cog. F/N.
See HCOBs
12 Mar 69 II PHYSICALLY ILL PCs AND PRE-OTs
24 Apr 69 RADIANETIC USE
14 May 69 SICKNESS
23 May 69R AUDITING OUT SESSIONS, NARRATIVE VERSUS
SOMATIC CHAINS
24 Jul 69R SERIOUSLY ILL PCs
27 Jul 69 ANTIBIOTICS
15 Jan 70 THE USES OF AUDITING
21 Jun 70 C/S Series 9, SUPERFICIAL ACTIONS (SICK PCs)
8 Mar 71R C/S Series 29R, CASE ACTIONS, OFF LINE
23 Jul 73RA ASSISTS
2 Apr 69RA DIANETIC ASSISTS
11 Jul 73RB ASSIST SUMMARY
4 Apr 71-1RB USE OF QUAD DIANETICS
New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins.
TOUCH ASSIST
Done off the meter by an auditor on the pc's body. EP pain gone. Cog.
F/N.
See HCOBs:
2 Apr 69 RADIANETIC ASSISTS
23 Jul 73RA ASSISTS
and:
BTB 7 Apr 72R TOUCH ASSISTS, CORRECT ONES
BTB 9 Oct 67R ASSISTS FOR INJURIES
UNCONSCIOUS PC
An unconscious pc can be audited off a meter by taking his hand and
having him touch nearby things like pillow, floor, etc. or body without
hurting an injured part.
A person in a coma for months can be brought around by doing this
daily.
One tells them a hand signal like, "Press my hand twice for 'Yes,' once
for 'No,'" and can get through to them, asking questions and getting "Yes"
and "No" hand responses. They usually respond with this, if faintly, even
while unconscious.
When one has the person conscious again one can do the assists.
FIRST AID RULES APPLY TO INJURED PERSONS.
IN MAKING THEM TOUCH SOMETHING THAT WAS MOVING, STOP IT FIRST.
IN MAKING THEM TOUCH THINGS THAT WERE HOT, COOL THEM FIRST.
WHEN POSSIBLE MAKE THEM HOLD THE THINGS THEY WERE HOLDING, IF ANY,
WHILE DOING A CONTACT ASSIST.
IF AFTER A TOUCH OR CONTACT ASSIST THEY DON'T F/N WHEN TAKEN TO OR
GIVEN AN EXAM, CHECK FOR O/R AND IF NO F/N TAKE THEM AWAY AND COMPLETE THE
ASSIST.
DIANETIC ASSISTS CAN BE RUN QUAD.
This is important tech. It saves pain and lives. Know it and use it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.lfg.kjm
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1971R
Remimeo REVISED 6 JULY 1978
C/Ses
Testing (Revisions in this type style)
Personnel (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Class IX
C/S Series 51R
OUT OF VALENCE
(OCA Graph)
Note: This Bulletin has been revised to include the reference on
NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES tech regarding valence handling.
On OCA graphs (the plotted test score of a pc) you find sometimes a
case that read high on the graph will drop and read lower after auditing.
This is caused by the fact that the person was OUT OF VALENCE in the
first place. Social machinery was what the first registered. Now after
auditing the graph expresses something closer to the actual being even
though it dropped.
We have known about this since '57 or '58 but I do not think it was
fully written up. Further, we now know MORE about it.
If you look into suppressive person tech you will find an SP has to be
out of valence to be SP. He does not know that he is because he is himself
in a non-self valence. He is "somebody else" and is denying that he himself
exists, which is to say denying himself as a self.
Now this doesn't mean all persons whose graphs dropped were active SPs.
But it does mean they weren't being themselves.
After some auditing they became themselves somewhat and this self isn't
the social cheery self the first graph said.
But the dropped graph is nearer truth.
Now, how to get the graph UP again?
The person with the dropped graph is closer to being himself but is not
yet fully restored, not yet fully into his "own valence."
While Class XI would handle this a bit differently, Class VIII Rundown
already has an answer. The Class VIII out of valence lists LX1, LX2 and LX3
and the recall, secondary and engram Quad for each assessed item from these
lists is a way to handle.
Additionally we now have a NEW ERA DIANETICS process specifically
designed to getting a pc into valence. Ref: HCOB 20 June 1978, New Era
Dianetics Series 15, IDENTITY RUNDOWN. It is not done out of sequence in
the Dianetic Rundown as a hit and miss patch-up.
Completing any cycle the pc is on is of course fundamental....
The fact is that the pc is emerging more and more and becoming himself
and then he himself begins to gain.
The graph that dives will come back up if general processing is done.
The pc will keep saying he is "more there." And it is true.
LRH:nt.rd.lfg L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971,1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JULY 1971R
REVISED 16 JULY 1978
Remimeo
(Revises and replaces HCOB
15 Mar 71 of same title.)
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
ASSISTS
For a pc being run on a Touch Assist for handling something around the
head (for example: teeth), go further even to the toes as the area extends
through the nerve channel to the whole body. Right-left and also whole
body. A head somatic also sticks in the spine.
ASSIST EP
All assists are run to cognition and should F/N VGI at the Examiner.
INJURY RUNDOWN
On an injury, after the Contact Assist, a Touch Assist and then an L1C
on the injured member could be done.... Dianetic actions would follow as
necessary. This would include handling the injury fully as a narrative item
and then fully handling all somatics connected with it, per New Era
Dianetics Series tech. (Ref: HCOB 28 July 71R Revised 25 June 78 New Era
Dianetics Series 8, DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON, HCOB 18 June 78 New Era
Dianetics Series 4, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM and HCOB 11 July
73RA Revised 15 July 78, ASSIST SUMMARY.)
PC RUNNING A TEMPERATURE
COMMANDS CORRECTED FROM EARLIER ISSUE
A persistent temperature can be brought down by running the pc on
Objective "Hold it still."
This can be run on a two command basis.
VERSION A
For a pc running a temperature too ill for regular auditing, he should
be given antibiotics and an assist type boost, not a major action like
Dianetics.
This version would be run if the pc is far too ill to get up. The pc is
run on a meter to cog F/N VGIs.
1. 2 command Repetitive Process alternate commands:
a. Look around here and find something.
b. Hold it still (until pc can or feels he can).
Then (a) again.
Then (b) again, etc.
This will drop a fever.
2. 2WC How do you feel? Have you felt like this before? Earlier
similar to F/N VGIs.
VERSION A is NOT very lasting. It is for very ill pcs and very high
temperatures.
VERSION B
This is true Objective "Hold it still" and is very lasting.
It is done on a pc who can, even with effort, walk around a room.
It is done OFF the meter to cog, GIs. The pc then should at once be put
on the meter and will be found to have an F/N. If no F/N on the meter the
process is either (a) unflat or (b) overrun. If unflat it is continued,
flattened off the meter and the same meter test follows. If overrun the
release point is rehabbed.
VERSION B commands are:
(a) Look around here and find something.
(b) Walk over to it.
(c) With your hands, hold it still.
The three commands are given in (a) (b) (c) sequence one after the
other, the pc executing each command and being acknowledged until the pc
has a cognition and GIs. He is then checked on the meter.
A thermometer can be used to check temperature after the meter check
for F/N. The temperature will be found to have subsided.
Both A and B versions can be used on the same pc.
Let us say on Monday, A Version is used. Then on Tuesday if temperature
has gone back up but pc is better B Version is then used.
The temperature process is most effective on a low order persistent
fever that goes on and on for days and even weeks. In such cases Version B
would be used and the temperature would come down and stay down very
nicely.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.nt.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JULY 1971RA
REVISED 25 JUNE 1978
RE-REVISED 22 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo (Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 54RA
New Era Dianetics Series 8R
DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
Make Dianetics work fully in our modern culture.
DO NOT BEGIN DIANETICS WITH A HEALTH FORM ANY LONGER.
BEGIN DIANETICS WITH THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET HCOB 24 JUNE 1978R.
THIS IS VITAL.
DRUGS OR ALCOHOL
IF YOU GET ANY TA ACTION OR READS ON DRUGS OR ALCOHOL EVEN IF THE PC
SAYS "NO" IT IS THE FIRST DIANETIC ACTION TO HANDLE THESE AS COVERED ON
HCOB 15 JULY BRA, III, NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES 9R, DRUG HANDLING.
If the pc is currently on drugs, it may be necessary to put him through
Objective Processes and a Hard TRs Course to get him off drugs. Doing this
will avoid the painful withdrawal symptoms particularly present in coming
off heroin or psychiatric drugs. The usual sequence of Drug Rundown steps
is given in HCOB 22 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 2R Full Pa Program
Outline and HCOB 15 Jul BRA, Issue III, New Era Dianetics Series 9R Drug
Handling.
The pc in many cases won't be able to run any engrams at all unless you
run out drugs, alcohol or medicines first. They will run these and these
alone until the engrams are gone.
People who "can't run engrams" are usually drug cases.
MEDICINE
If Medicine Part E of the Original Assessment Sheet reads then handle
it per C/S Series 48RB, as it reacts like any other drug, but pcs sometimes
don't think of medicine as drugs. They are.
LOSSES AND DEATHS
If Losses (of position, possessions, pets, etc.) reads or if Deaths of
relatives, etc. read on Parts F and G check for interest and run them out
Narrative Secondaries R3RA Quad.
UPSETS
If Upsets read and the pc is interested in running it out, handle it
with R3RA Narrative Quad. They can also be handled with regular
preassessment, etc., as in New Era Dianetics Series 4R.
DANGERS
If Part I reads and the pc is interested run the Danger out R3RA
Narrative Quad. They can also be handled with regular preassessment, etc.,
as in New Era Dianetics Series 4R.
ILLNESSES, ACCIDENTS, OPERATIONS
Parts J. K, L, M, N are handled if reading by checking interest with the pc
and running out the illness, operation, accident or undesired physical
condition R3RA Quad Narrative.
Preassess these items if needed to take to a full and complete handling
with R3RA Quad.
FAMILY INSANITY
If Section P reads, run the loss out R3RA Secondaries Quad. This can be
preassessed if needed.
PERCEPTION DIFFICULTIES
Lack of perception (sight, hearing, etc.) comes from overts and
improves when Flow 2 is done on any R3RA chain.
Having found the complaint regarding perception (which can include lack
of feeling, lack of emotion) you would treat it as an original item and
would preassess the condition and then handle it with R3RA Quad, like any
other original item. See New Era Dianetics Series 4R on handling original
items.
COMPULSIONS, REPRESSIONS, FEARS
If any compulsions, repressions or fears read in Part AA treat them as
original items just as given in New Era Dianetics Series 4R.
PREVIOUS DIANETIC OR SCIENTOLOGY PROCESSING
If the pc has charge on his previous processing, the auditing can be
run out R3RA Narrative Quad, first checking interest with the pc. Earlier
beginning and earlier similar are used.
LOOK ON YOURSELF AS SOMEONE ELSE
If Section FF reads, the pc should be given the Identity Rundown when
he reaches the correct step on his New Era Dianetics program.
FORMER PRACTICE
If Section GG reads, Former Practices, treat any former practice as an
original item and handle per New Era Dianetics Series 4R.
PROBLEMS YOU'RE TRYING TO SOLVE WITH PROCESSING
If this section reads and the pc is interested, treat the problem as an
original item per New Era Dianetics Series 4R.
DONE SOMETHING HARMFUL TO DIANETICS, DIANETICISTS,
SCIENTOLOGY, SCIENTOLOGISTS, ORGANIZATIONS
If this reads, check interest and treat it as an original item per New
Era Dianetics Series 4R.
REPAIR
REPAIR BY L3RF ANY FLUBBED DIANETIC SESSION OR CHAIN WITHIN 24 HOURS.
Do not let it go unrepaired.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH Ifg.kjm
Copyright � 1971,1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 AUGUST 1971R
Remimeo Issue II
Courses REVISED 5 JULY 1978
Checksheets
(Revisions in this type style)
TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED
(Revises 17 APRIL 1961.
This HCOB cancels the following:
Original HCOB 17 April 1961 TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED
Revised HCOB 5 Jan 71 TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED
Revised HCOB 21 June 71 TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED Issue III
HCOB 25 May 71 THE TR COURSE
This HCOB is to replace all other issues
of TRs 0-4 in all packs and checksheets.)
Due to the following factors, I have modernized TRs 0 to 4.
1. The auditing skill of any student remains only as good as he can do
his TRs.
2. Flubs in TRs are the basis of all confusion in subsequent efforts to
audit.
3. If the TRs are not well learned early in Scientology training
courses, THE BALANCE OF THE COURSE WILL FAIL AND SUPERVISORS AT UPPER
LEVELS WILL BE TEACHING NOT THEIR SUBJECTS BUT TRs.
4. Almost all confusions on meter, Model Sessions and Scientology or
Dianetic processes stem directly from inability to do the TRs.
5. A student who has not mastered his TRs will not master anything
further.
6. Scientology or Dianetic processes will not function in the presence
of bad TRs. The preclear is already being overwhelmed by process
velocity and cannot bear up to TR flubs without ARC breaks.
Academies were tough on TRs up to 1958 and have since tended to soften.
Comm Courses are not a tea party.
These TRs given here should be put in use at once in all auditor
training, in Academy and HGC and in the future should never be relaxed.
Public courses on TRs are NOT "softened" because they are for the
public. Absolutely no standards are lowered. THE PUBLIC ARE GIVEN REAL TRs-
ROUGH, TOUGH AND HARD. To do otherwise is to lose 90% of the results. There
is nothing pale and patty-cake about TRs.
THIS HCOB MEANS WHAT IT SAYS. IT DOES NOT MEAN SOMETHING ELSE. IT DOES
NOT IMPLY ANOTHER MEANING. IT IS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION FROM ANOTHER
SOURCE.
THESE TRs ARE DONE EXACTLY PER THIS HCOB WITHOUT ADDED ACTIONS OR
CHANGE.
NUMBER: OT TR 0 1971
NAME: Operating Thetan Confronting.
COMMANDS: None.
POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other with eyes closed, a
comfortable distance apart-about three feet.
PURPOSE: To train student to be there comfortably and confront another
person. The idea is to get the student able to BE there comfortably in a
position three feet in front of another person, to BE there and not do
anything else but BE there.
TRAINING STRESS: Student and coach sit facing each other with eyes closed.
There is no conversation. This is a silent drill. There is NO twitching,
moving, confronting with a body part, "system" or vias used to confront or
anything else added to BE there. One will usually see blackness or an area
of the room when one's eyes are closed. BE THERE, COMFORTABLY AND CONFRONT.
When a student can BE there comfortably and confront and has reached a
major stable win. the drill is passed.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in June 71 to give an additional
gradient to confronting and eliminate students confronting with their eyes,
blinking, etc. Revised by L. Ron Hubbard in August 1971 after research
discoveries on TRs.
NUMBER: TR 0 CONFRONTING REVISED 1961
NAME: Confronting Preclear.
COMMANDS: None.
POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other a comfortable distance
apart- about three feet.
PURPOSE: To train student to confront a preclear with auditing only or with
nothing. The whole idea is to get the student able to be there comfortably
in a position three feet in front of a preclear. to BE there and not do
anything else but BE there.
TRAINING STRESS: Have student and coach sit facing each other, neither
making any conversation or effort to be interesting. Have them sit and look
at each other and say and do nothing for some hours. Student must not
speak, blink, fidget, giggle or be embarrassed or anaten. It will be found
the student tends to confront WITH a body part, rather than just confront,
or to use a system of confronting rather than just BE there. The drill is
misnamed if confronting means to DO something to the pc. The whole action
is to accustom an auditor to BEING THERE three feet in front of a preclear
without apologizing or moving or being startled or embarrassed or defending
self. Confronting with a body part can cause somatics in that body part
being used to confront. The solution is just to confront and BE there.
Student passes when he can just BE there and confront and he has reached a
major stable win.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in Washington in March 1957 to train
students to confront preclears in the absence of social tricks or
conversation and to overcome obsessive compulsions to be "interesting."
Revised by L. Ron Hubbard April 1961 on finding that SOP Goals required for
its success a much higher level of technical skill than earlier processes.
Revised by L. Ron Hubbard in August 1971 after research discoveries on TRs.
NUMBER: TR 0 BULLBAIT REVISED 1961
NAME: Confronting Bullbaited.
COMMANDS: Coach: "Start" "That's it" "Flunk . "
POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other a comfortable distance
apart- about three feet.
PURPOSE: To train student to confront a preclear with auditing or with
nothing. The whole idea is to get the student able to BE there comfortably
in a position three feet in front of the preclear without being thrown off,
distracted or reacting in any way to what the preclear says or does.
TRAINING STRESS: After the student has passed TR 0 and he can just BE there
comfortably, "Bullbaiting" can begin. Anything added to BEING THERE is
sharply flunked by the coach. Twitches, blinks, sighs, fidgets, anything
except just being there is promptly flunked, with the reason why.
PATTER: Student coughs. Coach: "Flunk! You coughed. Start." This is the
whole of the coach's patter as a coach.
PATTER AS A CONFRONTED SUBJECT: The coach may say anything or do anything
except leave the chair. The student's "buttons" can be found and tromped on
hard. Any words not coaching words may receive no response from the
student. If the student responds, the coach is instantly a coach (see
patter above). Student passes when he can BE there comfortably without
being thrown off or distracted or react in any way to anything the coach
says or does and has reached a major stable win.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in Washington in March 1957 to train
students to confront preclears in the absence of social tricks or
conversation and to overcome obsessive compulsions to be "interesting."
Revised by L. Ron Hubbard April 1961 on finding that SOP Goals required for
its success a much higher level of technical skill than earlier processes.
Revised by L. Ron Hubbard in August 1971 after research discoveries on TRs.
NUMBER: TR 1 REVISED 1961
NAME: Dear Alice.
PURPOSE: To train the student to deliver a command newly and in a new unit
of time to a preclear without flinching or trying to overwhelm or using a
via.
COMMANDS: A phrase (with the "he saids" omitted) is picked out of the book
Alice in Wonderland and read to the coach. It is repeated until the coach
is satisfied it arrived where he is.
POSITION: Student and coach are seated facing each other a comfortable
distance apart.
TRAINING STRESS: The command goes from the book to the student and, as his
own, to the coach. It must not go from book to coach. It must sound natural
not artificial. Diction and elocution have no part in it. Loudness may
have.
The coach must have received the command (or question) clearly and have
understood it before he says "Good."
PATTER: The coach says "Start," says "Good" without a new start if the
command is received or says "Flunk" if the command is not received. "Start"
is not used again. "That's it" is used to terminate for a discussion or to
end the activity. If session is terminated for a discussion, coach must say
"Start" again before it resumes.
This drill is passed only when the student can put across a command
naturally, without strain or artificiality or elocutionary bobs and
gestures, and when the student can do it easily and relaxedly.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in London, April 1956, to teach the
communication formula to new students. Revised by L. Ron Hubbard 1961 to
increase auditing ability.
NUMBER: TR 2 REVISED 1978
NAME: Acknowledgements.
PURPOSE: To teach the student that an acknowledgement is a method of
controlling preclear communication and that an acknowledgement is a full
stop. The student must UNDERSTAND and APPROPRIATELY acknowledge the comm
and in such a way that it does not continue the comm.
COMMANDS: The coach reads lines from Alice in Wonderland omitting the "he
saids" and the student thoroughly acknowledges them. The student says
"Good," "Fine," "Okay," "I heard that," ANYTHING only so long as it is
appropriate to the pc's comm-
in such a way as actually to convince the person who is sitting there as
the preclear that he has heard it. The coach repeats any line he feels was
not truly acknowledged.
POSITION: Student and coach are seated facing each other at a comfortable
distance apart.
TRAINING STRESS: Teach student to acknowledge exactly what was said so
preclear knows it was heard. Ask student from time to time what was said.
Curb over and under acknowledgement. Let student do anything at first to
get acknowledgement across, then even him out. Teach him that an
acknowledgement is a stop, not beginning of a new cycle of communication or
an encouragement to the preclear to go on and that an acknowledgement must
be appropriate for the pays comm. The student must be broken of the habit
of robotically using "Good," "Thank you" as the only acks.
To teach further that one can fail to get an acknowledgement across or
can fail to stop a pc with an acknowledgement or can take a pc's head off
with an acknowledgement.
PATTER: The coach says "Start," reads a line and says "Flunk" every time
the coach feels there has been an improper acknowledgement. The coach
repeats the same line each time the coach says "Flunk." "That's it" may be
used to terminate for discussion or terminate the session. "Start" must be
used to begin a new coaching after a "That's it."
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in London in April 1956 to teach new
students that an acknowledgement ends a communication cycle and a period of
time, that a new command begins a new period of time. Revised 1961 and
again in 1978 by L. Ron Hubbard.
NUMBER: TR2 1/2 1978
NAME: Half Acks.
PURPOSE: To teach the student that a half acknowledgement is a method of
encouraging a pc to communicate.
COMMANDS: The coach reads lines from "Alice in Wonderland" omitting "he
saids" and the student half asks the coach. The coach repeats any line he
feels was not half asked.
POSITION: The student and coach are seated facing each other at a
comfortable distance apart.
TRAINING STRESS: Teach student that a half acknowledgement is an
encouragement to the pa to CONTINUE talking. Curb over-acknowledgement that
stops a pc from talking. Teach him further that a half ask is a way of
keeping a pc talking by giving the pc the feeling that he is being heard.
PATTER: The coach says "Start," reads a line and says "Flunk" every time
the coach feels there has been an improper half ask. The coach repeats the
same line each time the coach says "Flunk." "That's it" may be used to
terminate for discussion or terminate the session. If the session is
terminated for discussion, the coach must say "Start" again before it
resumes.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in July 1978 to train auditors in how
to get a pa to continue talking as in R3RA.
NUMBER: TR 3 REVISED 1961
NAME: Duplicative Question.
PURPOSE: To teach a student to duplicate without variation an auditing
question, each time newly, in its own unit of time, not as a blur with
other questions, and to acknowledge it. To teach that one never asks a
second question until he has received an answer to the one asked.
COMMANDS: "Do fish swim?" or "Do birds fly?"
POSITION: Student and coach seated a comfortable distance apart.
TRAINING STRESS: One question and student acknowledgement of its answer in
one unit of time which is then finished. To keep student from straying into
variations of command. Even though the same question is asked, it is asked
as though it had never occurred to anyone before.
The student must learn to give a command and receive an answer and to
acknowledge it in one unit of time.
The student is flunked if he or she fails to get an answer to the
question asked, if he or she fails to repeat the exact questions, if he or
she Q and As with excursions taken by the coach.
PATTER: The coach uses "Start" and "That's it," as in earlier TRs. The
coach is not bound after starting to answer the student's question but may
comm lag or give a commenting type answer to throw the student off. Often
the coach should answer. Somewhat less often the coach attempts to pull the
student into a Q and A or upset the student. Example:
Student: "Do fish swim?"
Coach: "Yes"
Student: "Good"
Student: "Do fish swim?"
Coach: "Aren't you hungry?"
Student: "Yes"
Coach: "Flunk."
When the question is not answered, the student must say, gently, "I'll
repeat the auditing question," and do so until he gets an answer. Anything
except commands, acknowledgement and as needed, the repeat statement is
flunked. Unnecessary use of the repeat statement is flunked. A poor command
is flunked. A poor acknowledgement is flunked. A Q and A is flunked (as in
example). Student misemotion or confusion is flunked. Student failure to
utter the next command without a long comm lag is flunked. A choppy or
premature acknowledgement is flunked. Lack of an acknowledgement (or with a
distinct comm lag) is flunked. Any words from the coach except an answer to
the question, "Start," "Flunk," "Good" or "That's it" should have no
influence on the student except to get him to give a repeat statement and
the command again. By repeat statement is meant, "I'll repeat the auditing
command."
"Start," "Flunk," "Good" and "That's it" may not be used to fluster or
trap the student. Any other statement under the sun may be. The coach may
try to leave his chair in this TR. If he succeeds it is a flunk. The coach
should not use introverted statements such as "I just had a cognition."
'Coach divertive' statements should all concern the student, and should be
designed to throw the student off and cause the student to lose session
control or track of what the student is doing. The student's job is to keep
a session going in spite of anything, using only command, the repeat
statement or the acknowledgement. The student may use his or her hands to
prevent a 'blow' (leaving) of the coach. If the student does anything else
than the above, it is a flunk and the coach must say so.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in London in April 1956, to overcome
variations and sudden changes in sessions. Revised 1961 by L. Ron Hubbard.
The old TR has a comm bridge as part of its training but this is now part
of and is taught in Model Session and is no longer needed at this level.
Auditors have been frail in getting their questions answered. This TR was
redesigned to improve that frailty.
NUMBER: TR 4 REVISED 1961
NAME: Preclear Originations.
PURPOSE: To teach the student not to be tongue-tied or startled or thrown
off session by originations of preclear and to maintain ARC with preclear
throughout an origination.
COMMANDS: The student runs "Do fish swim?" or "Do birds fly?" on coach.
Coach answers but now and then makes startling comments from a prepared
list given by supervisor. Student must handle originations to satisfaction
of coach.
POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other at a comfortable distance
apart.
TRAINING STRESS: The student is taught to hear origination and do three
things. 1. Understand it; 2. Acknowledge it; and 3. Return preclear to
session. If the coach feels abruptness or too much time consumed or lack of
comprehension, he corrects the student into better handling.
PATTER: All originations concern the coach, his ideas, reactions or
difficulties, none concern the auditor. Otherwise the patter is the same as
in earlier TRs. The student's patter is governed by: 1. Clarifying and
understanding the origin. 2. Acknowledging the origin. 3. Giving the repeat
statement "I'll repeat the auditing command," and then giving it. Anything
else is a flunk.
The auditor must be taught to prevent ARC breaks and differentiate
between a vital problem that concerns the pc and a mere effort to blow
session. (TR 3 Revised.) Flunks are given if the student does more than 1.
Understand; 2. Acknowledge; 3. Return pc to session.
Coach may throw in remarks personal to student as on TR 3. Student's
failure to differentiate between these (by trying to handle them) and
coach's remarks about self as "pc" is a flunk.
Student's failure to persist is always a flunk in any TR but here more
so. Coach should not always read from list to originate, and not always
look at student when about to comment. By originate is meant a statement or
remark referring to the state of the coach or fancied case. By comment is
meant a statement or remark aimed only at student or room. Originations are
handled, comments are disregarded by the student.
HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in London in April 1956, to teach
auditors to stay in session when preclear dives out. Revised by L. Ron
Hubbard in 1961 to teach an auditor more about handling origins and
preventing ARC breaks.
As TR 5 is also part of the CCHs it can be disregarded in the Comm
Course TRs despite its appearance on earlier lists for students and staff
auditors.
TRAINING NOTE
It is better to go through these TRs several times getting tougher each
time than to hang on one TR forever or to be so tough at start student goes
into a decline.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jw:JR:JS:nt.pe.rd.lfg
Copyright � 196t, 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 SEPTEMBER 1971R
REVISED 20 MAY 1975
(Note: This is a revised issue for Class VIII
Class VIII Only & HSST Courses. The Power and Upper Level
Class VIII C/Ses C/Ses will be issued as additions for Class
Class VIII Auditors VII & Solo C/S Courses.)
Class VIII Checksheets
HSST Course
CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS
This is the revised issue of the Class VIII HCOB Case Supervisor
Actions. Several C/Ses have been brought up to date from the original C/S
Booklet of 10 Dec 68.
The following are basic Case Supervisor actions.
It is to be noted Symptoms are double lettered (AA, BB) and the
Directions to Auditors are numbered (1, 2, 3). When more than one Direction
applies to a Symptom, a letter is added (1A, 1B).
In the future if a related Symptom is added, it will go to a triple
letter for the same Class (BBB, JJJ).
In the future, for a triple letter, a Direction will be numbered as
hundreds, (BBB 200, BBB 200 A).
Thus we have a system which can expand and be refined which can be
charted and boxed.
A chart can be drawn up of Symptoms. This chart gives the numbers for
Directions. To save himself from writing, the Case Supervisor can get the
slips run off separately in quantity.
These slips can be packaged in envelopes. Or go into a covered wooden
box with 80/100 pigeon holes. The door closes over the holes, the chart is
on the inside of the door, the whole thing can be padlocked. The pattern is
that of a flag locker in which signal flags are kept. Each pigeon hole is
numbered.
The C/S then simply looks on his chart, deals out of the C/S locker a
number of slips, staples them, puts on auditor and pc, uses a time/date
stamp and he is very much in business.
The C/S does not issue the Symptoms in folders. Only the directions.
His comments to the auditor can be made on a blank sheet stapled in
front of the separate slips.
He then has his locker, he has his independent copy of this HCOB for
separate reference. He will have his chart.
His only real problem is how to keep himself supplied with slips of
Directions. It is probably best to cut these all of a piece on mimeo
stencils and get them run off in batches.
Standard grades are not part of this set-up as it is understood that
the auditor knows these. Directions to do standard grades are written on
the blank sheet.
Good Luck.
INDEX
CLASS VIII
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
NAME NO. NO. HOLE
Rudiments, Light use AA 1 1
Rudiments, Fly all BB 2 2
Ruds, or GF CC 3 3
Green Form CCC 300 4
GF all Black CCC 300A 5
GF, Misunderstood Case CCC 300B 6
Ruds, High TA on DD 4 7
High TA Chronic DDD 400 8
Out Rudiments DDD 400A 9
Complaints About F/Ns EE 5 10
Previous Bad Auditing FF 6 11
Nattery or Critical Pc GG 7 12
Crossed Rudiments HH 8 13
Rudiments, Protesting HHH 800 14
Out Rudiments HHH 800A 15
Repeating PTP HHH 800B 16
Bad Session last time II 9 17
Incomplete Actions III 900 18
Rock Slam III 900A 19
Rock Slam at Examiner III 900B 20
Assist III 900C 21
Lists Errors In:
Recent Possible Incorrect List JJ 10A 22
Lots of Earlier List Available JJ 10B 23
Old Earlier List Not Available JJ 10C 24
List (Recent) Not Available JJ 10D 25
List Item Didn't F/N JJJ 100E 26
List Error 3 SPs JJJ 100H 27
Persisting Item JJJ 100J 28
Alcohol KK 11 29
Drugs LL 12 30
Tiredness MM 13 31
Exteriorization, Bypassed NN 14 32
F/Ns Bypassed in Session OO 15 33
F/N Packed up PP 16 34
Exteriorization, Case Cannot QQ 17 35
Exteriorization QQQ 170 36
Money, Has Trouble With RR 18 37
Solid, Bank Gone Solid SS 19 38
Process Split by Break TT 20 39
Gains Invalidated UU 21 40
Resistive Case, Assess 7 Cases VV 22 41
Resistive Case, Doesn't Want Auditing VV 22A 42
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
NAME NO. NO. HOLE
Resistive Cases, Recall Pretending VV 22B 43
Resistive Cases, Prevent Auditing VV 22C 44
Resistive Cases, Drugs VVV 220D+E 45
Resistive Cases, Drugs, Poor Ethics VVV 220D+E 46
Resistive Cases, Drugs, Overts VVV 220E(1) 47
Resistive Cases, Former Therapy VVV 220F 48
Resistive Cases, Earlier Practice VVV 220G 49
Resistive Cases, Out of Valence VVV 220H 50
LX3 VVV 220H(1) 51
LX2 VVV 220H(2) 52
LX1 VVV 220H(3) 53
LX1 Assessed to Grief or Loss VVV 220H(4) 54
Resistive Cases, Overts VV 22I 55
Resistive Cases, Grades VV 22J 56
Resistive Cases, Rudiments VV 22K 57
Resistive Cases, Rudiments VVV 220K(1) 58
Resistive Cases, Engram Matching
PT Dangers VVV 22L 59
Resistive Cases, Physically Ill VV 22M 60
Had Been Physically Ill VVV 220M(1) 61
Resistive Cases, ARC Breaks VVV 220K(2) 62
S&D, Singular Item YYY 250A 63
Physically Ill YYY 250B 64
PTS, Environmental Menace YYY 250C 65
Assists ZZZ 260 66
Unwarranted Sec Checks ZZZ 260D 67
__________
CASE SUPERVISOR AA
CLASS VIII
Rudiments, light use of
Symptoms
Pc in session easily.
Gets case gains.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 1
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly the ruds to F/N.
Run the rudiments, ARC break, PTP and/or M/W/H to the first F/N. Use
Suppress and False if pc edgy about ruds. Do not fly any ruds if pc has F/N
at sess start.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR BB
CLASS VIII
Rudiments, fly all
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT not in session.
Tends to take over session.
Hard to handle in session.
Ends sessions with bad indicators.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 2
CLASS VIII
To the Auditor
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly each rudiment to floating needle.
ARC Brk
Present time problem
Missed withholds.
Use Suppress on a "clean" read.
Use False read (Has anyone said you had a_______when you didn't.)
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR CC
CLASS VIII
Rudiments or Green Form
Symptom
Case not audited for some time.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 3
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly a rud or do GF, Method No. 3.
(If there is no F/N on rudiments, then do a Green Form omitting the
standard ARC Brk, PTP and M/W/H which have just been done anyway.)
Use itsa earlier itsa. No lists.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR CCC
CLASS VIII
Green Form
Symptom
Pc requesting review.
Pc has not been audited for some time.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 300
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Assess GF+40 once through, marking lengths of reads.
2. Return folder to C/S (who should also have the FES info on the case
available to do a proper C/S.)
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR CCC
CLASS VIII
Green Form
Symptom
All Black reads.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 300A
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. List what it was to an item or date it.
Running it is too heavy a Green Form action.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR CCC
CLASS VIII
Green Form
Symptom
Misunderstood Case Condition reads.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 300B
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Handle Misunderstood Case Condition if it reads.
Get in Suppress and Invalidated.
Do a Remedy B on "Who or what haven't you understood about (your
case)," test if it's "Case or Cases," do a Remedy B on the question
that reads.
2. Verify and rehab all grades and sections (if Clear omit Power).
3. Return folder to C/S for further action if (2) hangs up and doesn't
go.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR DD
CLASS VIII
Rudiments, high TA on
Symptom
TA goes up high when rudiments used.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 4
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Per C/S Series 1, Auditors Rights, check Protest or Overrun. If TA
remains high, the trained auditor is to do a C/S 53 and handle.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR DDD
CLASS VIII
High TA, chronic
Symptom
TA is at 3.5 or above.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 400
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Assess Short Hi-Lo TA List (C/S Ser 53) and handle to F/Ning list.
(NOTE: Also handle any errors found in FES which the pc may not be
aware of, like processes run twice etc.)
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR DDD
CLASS VIII
Out rudiments
Symptoms
Audited over ARC breaks of long duration and M/W/H.
Too many GF, Remedy Bs and S&Ds.
Pc was OK now reported in grief after too much over-correction and
errors.
He's had too many repairs that were badly done.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 400A
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly each rud to F/N. Be alert for ARC breaks of long duration. Chase
back to basic.
2. Assess: Auditing
Treatment
Healing
Scientology
Sessions
Auditors
Reviews
Correction
3. Prepcheck each item that reads, in order of size of read.
4. Back to C/S (for a C/S based on what was found in FES.)
CASE SUPERVISOR EE
CLASS VIII
Complaints about F/Ns
Symptom
Pc or pre-OT claims he F/Ns too easily or too quickly when he has not
had any gains.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 5
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Check for cut communications (itsa E/S itsa to F/N).
2. Prepcheck floating needles "On floating needles_______" to F/N.
Be sure to clear the command well with a green pc.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR FF
CLASS VIII
Previous bad auditing
Symptoms
Pc reluctant, has aches or pains.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 6
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Assess: Auditors
Auditing
Scientology
Dianetics
Engrams
Secondaries
Locks
Reviews
Sessions
Cases
Case gain
Results
2. Prepcheck result.
Beware on the assessment pc doesn't "get an item" just because he
doesn't understand it. If so, clear item and reassess.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR GG
CLASS VIII
Nattery or critical pc
Symptoms
Pc is highly critical.
Natters.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 7
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Prepcheck "Withholds?" "On withholds has_____."
Clear command well.
2. Pull withholds, E/S.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR HH
CLASS VIII
Crossed rudiments
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT answers PTPs with ARC breaks, ARC breaks with PTPs, missed
W/Hs with PTPs, etc.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 8
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Clear each rudiment thoroughly with preclear before running it and
fly each rud to F/N.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR HHH
CLASS VIII
Rudiments
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT shows signs of protesting in session. Lots of False
assertions by auditors.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 800
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Get in ruds with Suppress and False with prefix "In auditing has
there been an/a _____ " ARC break, problem, withhold (not missed W/H).
If the pc or pre-OT can't think of it, after he looks for it, you test
False read with various questions. "Who said you had an/a _____reading
when you didn't have one." or "Has anyone asked for answers you didn't
have." or "Has somebody pulled_____ that had been pulled before." etc.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR HHH
CLASS VIII
PTP
Symptom
Preclear has repeating PTP.
CASE SUPERVISOR 800B
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Pick up ARC breaks. ARCU CDEINR, itsa earlier similar itsa to F/N.
2. Handle PTPs. If it reads well, itsa earlier similar itsa to F/N. Make
a Remedy B out of the PTP if it requires handling in any way but mild
itsa. Use the PTP
she says it is in the question. "In your past who or what was similar
to_____."
Make it make sense. Handle per the laws of L&N.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR II
CLASS VIII
Bad session last time
Symptoms
From folder pc was mishandled.
Wound up at the Examiner caved in.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 9
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
NOTE: Study the folder to find and correct the error.
If out ruds:
1. Run ruds with the questions:
In your last session did you have an ARC break?
In your last session did you have a problem?
In your last session did you have a withhold?
2. If no F/N yet, do L1C "In your last session_____."
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR III
CLASS VIII
Incomplete actions
Symptoms
Pc either overrun or underrun as session did not end on F/N.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 900
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. C/S is to handle as per C/S Ser 34 "Non-F/N Cases."
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR III
CLASS VIII
Rock slam
Symptoms
R/S on M/W/H. Hard to clean.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 900A
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Prepcheck missed withholds.
"On missed withholds has anything been_____."
2. Pull overts. (Be sure to get the crime back of the R/S. Use method of
magnifying or exaggerating the overts if needed. )
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR III
CLASS VIII
Rock slam
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT, R/S at Examiner.
A R/S, the pc came out of session which means the F/N was an ARC break
needle or false report. A rock slam can be caused by either a crime or
an invalidation. It can cool on invalidation but would come back as a
crime.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 900B
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Clean up invalidation of last session.
2. Handle any continuous PT overts on Scientology and see if it
continues to read as invalidation or as a real read. If it is even
vaguely hard to clean, the correct action is to list.
3. "What are you trying to prevent." List & null to one reading item.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR III
CLASS VIII
Assist
Symptoms
Ruds overrun.
By Examiner statement still had a PTP after the last session.
Delicate pc.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 900C
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Indicate to the pc overrun and bypassed F/Ns.
2. Assesses GF Method 5.
3. Return folder back to C/S.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR JJ
CLASS VIII
Lists, errors in
Symptoms
Listing trouble.
Pc nattery.
Ethics trouble after being listed on an S&D.
Rem B or Prevent. Ill after being listed on something.
Heavy session ARC breaks without explanation.
Actions
(1) Recent list.
(2) Old lists.
(3) The earlier list (recent) not available.
(4) Old earlier lists not available.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 10A
INSTRUCTION TO THE AUDITOR
Lists
(1)
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Recent possible incorrect list.
(1) Find the list, do L4B, Method 5, on it.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 10B
CLASS VIII
Lists
(2)
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Lots of earlier lists available.
1. Find the earliest S&D. Do L4B to correct item by the Laws of Listing
and Nulling HCOB 1 August 68. Give it to the pc as his first S&D item.
Correct no further.
2. Find the earliest Remedy B. Do L4B to correct item as in (1).
3. Find the earliest list ever done on the case, do L4B as in (1).
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 10C
CLASS VIII
Lists
(3)
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Old earlier lists not available.
1. Assess review, auditors, auditing, lists, old lists, list items.
2. Do L4B with "On (item found in (1) " Method 5). Handle each item as
it reads with itsa and indicate the BPC.
Or as an alternate C/S do the following:
1. L4B on every list pc can recall (Method 5).
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 10D
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Lists
(4)
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
The earlier list (recent) not available.
1. Do L4B "On that list (specify)_____" (Method 5).
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 100E
CLASS VIII
Lists
(5)
List item didn't F/N in the matter of listing and nulling.
1. Do L4B on that list (specify), Method 5.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 100H
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Lists
(6)
List error, 3 SPs found on one list.
Difficulty on the job.
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Find and correct this incomplete list. Renull to one reading item.
2. Do L4B, Method 5.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 100J
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Lists
(7)
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
A persistent item that doesn't blow. Wrong item.
1. Find which list it came from.
2. Correct the list by L4B, Method 5.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR KK
Alcohol
Symptoms
Delusions.
Can't leave alcohol alone.
Dishonesty.
Physical deterioration.
Deception.
Religious fixations.
Sexual perversions or promiscuity.
Alcohol produces its effect by rapidly burning up the B1 vitamin and
foods in the body. This pulls a thetan in to the resulting low area.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 11
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Give pc B1 before session.
1. Fly ruds or GF to F/N.
2. Rehab any and all releases through drinking. Get number of times by
counting.
3. 3 Way or Quad Recall:
F1. Recall another giving you alcohol.
F2. Recall giving alcohol to another.
F3. Recall another giving alcohol to another or others.
F0. Recall giving yourself alcohol.
4. 3 Way or Quad Engrams:
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving you alcohol.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
giving alcohol to another or others.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving alcohol to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
giving yourself alcohol.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR LL
Drugs
Symptoms
Registers on the meter as having taken drugs.
High TA.
Seems unauditable on ARC Straightwire or above or hangs up in doing
grades.
Talks randomly.
Compares Scientology sessions to former drug trips.
Looking for the same euphoria from a Scn session as received during
drug trips.
Dub-in engram.
Drugs, and also bio-chemical substances used in "treatment" or in
tranquilizing the person produce delusion. This is done by making a reduced
creation in the body so that the thetan is dragged into heavily creating.
Makes a + and -.
If a person is heavily the effect of something, then he has done it as
an overt.
A preclear who has recently been on drugs should not be audited until
off them for 6 weeks.
B1 vitamin in heavy dosage has been known to alleviate the no-create
body drag and so stop the obsessive create thetan drag.
Auditing someone during a drug delusion state heavily hangs up a case
and must not be done. Vitamins are not drugs.
Drugs include a long category of substances and even some poisons.
Anything that produced a release of a thetan from the body can be
rehabbed.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 12
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
The Class VIII Drug Rundown:
1. Fly rud or GF to F/N by itsa earlier itsa, no lists.
2. Rehab former releases for each type of drug taken, get number of
times released on each. (Each should F/N.)
3. 3 Way or Quad Recall:
F1. Recall another giving you drugs.
F2. Recall giving drugs to another.
F3. Recall another giving drugs to another or others.
F0. Recall giving yourself drugs. 4. 3 Way or Quad Secondaries:
F1. Locate an incident containing loss or emotion of another giving
you drugs.
F2. Locate an incident containing loss or emotion of you giving
drugs to another or others.
F3. Locate an incident containing loss or emotion of another giving
drugs to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing loss or emotion of giving
yourself drugs. 5. 3 Way or Quad Engrams:
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving you drugs.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
giving drugs to another or others.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving drugs to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
giving yourself drugs.
RUN THE ENGRAMS PRECISELY BY THE BOOK.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR MM
CLASS VIII
Tiredness
Symptoms
Tired continually.
Sleeps too much.
Tiredness is technically BLUNTED PURPOSE.
The most effective way to handle this is by the overt-motivator engram.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 13
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Tiredness:
F1. Find and run an engram or chain of the pc's purpose being
blunted to F/N.
F2. Find and run an engram or chain of blunting the purpose of
another or others to F/N.
F3. Find and run an engram or chain of another blunting the purpose
of another or others.
F0. Find and run an engram of the pc blunting his own purpose. (If
a Quad pc.)
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR NN
CLASS VIII
Exteriorization, bypassed
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT went exterior and the auditor kept on auditing when he
should have stopped right there, pc went back in or got upset about it.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 14
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
Int RD if the pc hasn't had any yet. If he has, then:
1. Date/Locate the point of exteriorization.
2. Acknowledge pc's release in last session. NOTE: If pc is still upset,
the Int RD needs to be repaired.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR OO
CLASS VIII
F/Ns bypassed in session
Symptoms
Auditor went by F/Ns on the same subject. TA was low, pc cognited. TA
then went up on same subject.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 15
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Rehab the F/N by asking "On the process (described) how many times
were you released? "
2. Indicate the overrun.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR PP
CLASS VIII
F/N packed up
Symptoms
Case has ceased to F/N.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 16
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Handle as per C/S Ser 34 "NON F/N CASES."
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR QQ
CLASS VIII
Exteriorization, case cannot
Symptoms
Case doesn't exteriorize at a level it should.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 17
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Assess: Exteriorization
Death
Release
Fear
Havingness
Nothing
Going off
Responsibility
Dizziness.
2. Prepcheck what assessed out.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR QQQ
CLASS VIII
Exteriorization
Symptoms
Bypassed in this or former session.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 170
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. C/S inspects the folder and orders an Interiorization Rundown.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR RR
CLASS VIII
Money, has troubles with
Symptoms
Cannot buy training or processing.
Has money troubles.
Wastes money.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 18
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
LM 1
1. Assess: Beggarized
Pauperized
Poor
Rich
Broke
Money
Power
Buying
Poverty
Capital
Accounts
Embezzlement
Waste
2. Prepcheck the items that read in order of size of read.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR SS
CLASS VIII
Solid, bank gone solid
Symptoms
Engrams, masses feel too solid to pc.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 19
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. L3B, Method 3, and handle. (Also can be done by Dn auditor.)
2. Then on to Dianetic C/S to handle any pictures and masses.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR TT
CLASS VIII
Process split by a break
Symptoms
A break was taken or a session ended without a major action completed.
OR TA went up the moment the session was resumed or the process in next
session was started again.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 20
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Check to see if the process went release out of session.
If so, rehab the F/N.
If no F/N to be had then run ruds "Between sessions_____." to F/N and
finish the process.
If TA high, do not do rods. Instead assess Short Hi-Lo TA List (C/S Ser
53) and
handle.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR UU
CLASS VIII
Gains invalidated
Symptoms
Pc roller-coasters after an apparently good session.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 21
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Check for invalidation "Since last session has anything been
invalidated."
If no F/N run "Since last session has anything been suppressed."
If no F/N do Green Form. No lists. Itsa earlier itsa only.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR VV
CLASS VIII
Resistive case
(Can be used more than once so long as same item does not get used
again after being handled.)
Symptoms
Thick review folder
Roller-coasters
Complains
Blows courses or orgs
Long sessions
Hard to get F/Ns
Doesn't want auditing
Makes trouble for auditors
Does not respond to auditing.
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 22
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
Assess 7 cases
Separate RUDS & GRADES
Do not state "Resistive Cases" but "Special Cases," HCOB 23/9/68 Issue
II.
(a) Does not want auditing
(b) Pretending training or grades not attained
(c) Has not had auditing
(d) Seeking the same thrill attained from drugs
(e) Has taken drugs
(f) Former therapy before Scientology
(g) Has been part of earlier practices
(h) Out of valence
(i) Continuously committing overts in Scientology
(j) Audited with prior grades out
(k) Audited with rudiments out
ARC Brk_____ PTPs_____ Withholds_____ Ovt_____
(l) Has an engram exactly matching PT dangers
(m) Seriously physically ill
OR assess list of HCOB 30 June 71R "Expanded GF 40RB" Method 5 and
fully handle per the list instructions.
The following C/Ses are included here to be referred to in using HCOB
30 June 71R "Expanded GF 40RB."
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22A
(a) Discuss, in session start why he or she doesn't want auditing and
identify the cause, as it arises, ARC Brk, PTP or missed W/H and
handle.
Don't fail to pull the M/W/H if pc natters. Don't call it an ARC break.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22B
(b) 3 Way or Quad Recall
F1. Recall another pretending to you.
F2. Recall you pretending to another.
F3. Recall another pretending to another or others.
F0. Recall pretending to yourself.
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another pretending to you.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
pretending to another.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another pretending to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
pretending to yourself.
RESISTIVE CASE 22C
(c) List and null who or what would prevent auditing? To one item.
____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASE 220D OR E
(d) or (e)
1. Rehab drugs. Get how many times released for each type of drug to
F/N.
2. 3 Way or Quad Recall
F1. Recall another giving you drugs.
F2. Recall giving drugs to another.
F3. Recall another giving drugs to another or others.
F0. Recall giving yourself drugs.
3. 3 Way or Quad Secondaries per C/S 12 Commands.
4. 3 Way or Quad Engrams, R3R
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving you drugs.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
giving drugs to another.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving drugs to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
giving yourself drugs.
Run engrams by the book. Then to Dn auditor for Dn Drug Rundown.
____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220E (1)
Drugs
Symptoms
Registers on the meter as having taken drugs.
No F/N on having taken drugs.
Has overts on drugs if won't rehab.
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Get in ruds with attention to missed withholds and overts. Look for
R/S, clean to basic.
2. Rehab any and all drugs.
____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220F
(f) 3 Way or Quad Recall
F1. Recall another giving a former therapy to you.
F2. Recall giving a former therapy to another.
F3. Recall another giving a former therapy to another or others.
F0. Recall giving a former therapy to yourself.
3 Way or Quad Engrams, R3R, by the book.
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving a former therapy to you.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
giving therapy to another.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another giving therapy to another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
you giving a former therapy to yourself.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220G
(g) 3 Way or Quad Recall
F1. Recall another forcing an earlier practice on you.
F2. Recall you forcing an earlier practice on another.
F3. Recall another forcing an earlier practice on another or
others.
F0. Recall forcing an earlier practice on yourself.
3 Way Engrams, R3R, by the book.
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another forcing an earlier practice on you.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
forcing an earlier practice on another.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another forcing an earlier practice on another or others.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
forcing an earlier practice on yourself.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASE 220H
OUT OF VALENCE (For Section K of Expanded GF 40RB.)
1. Assess LX3.
2. Handle all significantly reading items in order of read by 3 Way or
Quad Recall, 3 Way or Quad Engrams on each item.
3. Continue as above with LX2 then LX1. End off when pc has a marked
change in valence.
If no valence change on LX lists then continue with 3 Way or Quad
Recall, 3 Way or Quad Engrams on being someone else per 4 and 5 below.
4. 3 Way or Quad Recall each leg to F/N.
F1. Recall another causing you to be someone else.
F2. Recall you causing another to be someone else.
F3. Recall another causing another or others to be someone else.
F0. Recall causing yourself to be someone e/se.
5. 3 Way or Quad Engrams
F1. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another causing you to be someone e/se. R3R to erasure and F/N.
F2. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
causing another to be someone else. R3R to erasure and F/N.
F3. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of
another causing another or others to be someone else. R3R to
erasure and F/N.
F0. Locate an incident containing pain and unconsciousness of you
causing yourself to be someone else.
_____________________________________________________________________
C/S 220H (1)
3 Way or Quad Recall
F1 . "Recall another causing you to take the attitude of (LX3
item)."
F2. "Recall you causing another to take the attitude of (LX3
item)."
F3. "Recall another causing another or others to take the attitude
of (LX3 item)."
F0. "Recall causing yourself to take the attitude of (LX3 item)."
3 Way or Quad Engrams (Standard R3R)
F1. "Locate an incident of another causing you to take the attitude
of (LX3 item)."
F2. "Locate an incident of your causing another to take the
attitude of (LX3 item)."
F3. "Locate an incident of another causing another or others to
take the attitude of (LX3 item)."
F0. "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to take the attitude of
(LX3 item)."
_____________________________________________________________________
C/S 220H (2)
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. Fly a rudiment to F/N.
2. Assess LX2 (or use existing list if previously assessed. Handle in
order of read. )
3 Way or Quad Recall
F1. "Recall another causing you to feel (LX2 item)."
F2. "Recall you causing another (to feel) (LX2 item)."
F3. "Recall another causing another or others (to feel) (LX2
item)."
F0. "Recall causing yourself to feel (LX2 item)."
3 Way or Quad Secondaries
F1. "Locate an incident of another causing you to feel (LX2 item)."
F2. "Locate an incident of you causing another (to feel) (LX2
item)."
F3. "Locate an incident of another causing another or others (to
feel) (LX2 item)."
F0. "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to feel (LX2 item).
"
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 220H (3)
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. Fly rudiments to F/N.
2. Assess LX1 (omit any item handled earlier)-run 3 Way or Quad Recall
and Engrams.
F1. Run "Recall another causing you to be (LX1 item)."
F2. Run "Recall you causing another to be (LX1 item)."
F3. Run "Recall another causing another to be (LX1 item)."
F0. "Recall causing yourself to be (LX1 item)."
F1. Find and run an engram of " another causing you to be (LX1
item)."
F2. Find and run an engram of "you (LX1 item)ing somebody or
something."
F3. Find and run an engram of "another (LX1 item)ing another."
F0. Find and run an engram of "you causing yourself (LX1 item)."
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220H (4)
LX1 assessed to grief or loss.
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. Fly ruds to F/N, check for any protest.
2. Run "Recall grief" to F/N.
3. Find and run a secondary or chain of grief and loss to pc or pre-OT.
4. Find and run overt secondary or chain of causing grief and loss.
5. Find and run a secondary or chain of another causing grief and
loss to another.
6. Find and run a secondary or chain of you causing yourself grief and
loss.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22I
CONTINUOUS OVERTS.
List and null "What are you trying to prevent" by the laws of listing
and nulling to one item.
If 2 or more read on 1st nulling, extend the list until only 1 reads
when all are called.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22J
AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT.
Check sub-zeros, grades up to IV and run those not previously run.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22K
AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT.
Run each to F/N: In auditing have you had an ARC break.
(Itsa, earlier itsa, ARCU CDEI.)
In auditing have you had a problem?
(Itsa earlier itsa.)
In auditing have you had a withhold?
(Itsa earlier itsa and WHO nearly found out?)
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220K (1)
AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT.
Run each to F/N:
1. In auditing have you been audited with an/a _____ARC Brk, PTP,
withhold.
On ARC Brk use ARCU CDEINR itsa earlier similar itsa to F/N.
On PTP handle with itsa earlier similar itsa to F/N.
On withholds, who nearly found out, itsa earlier similar itsa to F/N.
2. Then "Have you audited someone over an " ARC Brk, PTP, withhold, each
to F/N.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220K (2)
AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT.
Assessed to ARC breaks
1. Prepcheck ARC breaks.
2. If no good indicators at end trace back breaks by ARCU CDEINR.
Itsa earlier similar itsa.
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 22L
Engram matching PT dangers
(Please use LRH C/S YYY, C/S 250C, "Environmental Menace")
RESISTIVE CASES 22M
SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL.
Get a competent medical analysis. When well or if no improvement, find
and audit any engrams or chain to F/N, R3R Triple or Quad.
(Ruds do not have to be flown.) (Be careful in auditing a person
running a fever, audit lightly. Do not force them into anything.)
_____________________________________________________________________
RESISTIVE CASES 220M (1)
Had been physically ill.
Protesting the item.
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. Fly ruds to F/N, check protest on illness item. If so, handle protest
fully, (itsa earlier similar itsa). If item still reads, find and run
an illness engram chain to F/N.
You can't run a recall process on illness or engrams. It is too much.
If it doesn't read on illness reassess and send back to C/S.
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR YYY
CLASS VIII
S & D WSU
Symptoms
Reads on Green Form as PTS.
Been ill.
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 250
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUDITOR
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. PTS interview per C/S Series 79 or HCOB 10 Aug 73.
2. 3 S & Ds, if necessary.
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR YYY
CLASS VIII
Flubbed S & D.
Symptoms
Singular item has been represented.
_____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 250A
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:_________________
Auditor: Time: ________________
1. Renull the list, not the represent list. Indicate the item to the pc.
Indicate error of represent. Handle any PTPs and missed withholds.
2. Then get on with the grade or section.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR YYY
CLASS VIII
Illness
Symptoms
Pc PTS.
Unskilled L&N auditor.
Pc has had S & D.
WSU in the past which were correct. (S & Ds being a limited process.)
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 250B
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly a rud.
2. Assess: Difficulties
Being suppressed
Attacks
Enemies
Suppressing
Incomplete cycles
Unmocking
Defense
Protest
Make nothing of
Withdrawing from
3. Prepcheck each reading item in order of size of read to F/N. Being
careful to handle any ARC breaks.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR YYY
CLASS VIII
Environmental menace
Symptoms
Pc or pre-OT PTS
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 250C
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Fly each rud to F/N.
2. Find the environmental menace to the pc just by discussion. It's the
obvious one. It is a situation that is wanted, not an item.
3. Find an engram containing a situation that exactly matches the PT
situation found in 2.
4. Run subject of engram three ways or quad.
F1. "Locate an engram that matches PT dangers."
(Use as command 1, then 2, 3, 4, etc.) R3R.
F2. "A time when you gave another such an engram." R3R.
F3. "A time when another gave another or others such an engram."
R3R.
F0. A time when you gave yourself such an engram." R3R.
CASE SUPERVISOR ZZZ
CLASS VIII
Assists
Symptoms
Had a severe injury.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 260
CLASS VIII
Handle as per HCOB 23 July 71-"Assists," Section "Injury Rundown."
1. Touch Assist.
2. Contact Assist.
3. L1C on the injured member.
4. Then R3R on the injury incident.
Usual Dianetic actions would follow as necessary.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR ZZZ
CLASS VIII
Unwarranted Sec Checks
Symptoms
No Green Form done to indicate pc should have a Joburg.
Run past many free needles.
____________________________________________________________________
CASE SUPERVISOR 260D
CLASS VIII
Pc or pre-OT: Date:________________
Auditor: Time: _______________
1. Do a Prepcheck on Joburg or Sec Checks, whichever reads.
2. Clean up this evaluation and needless action and indicate to the pc
or pre-OT it was needless.
3. L1R.
4. Pc or pre-OT to next grade or action.
____________________________________________________________________
CLASS VIII
CASE SUPERVISOR CHART
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
SYMPTOM NO. NO. HOLE
Alcohol KK 11 29
All Black CCC 300A 5
ARC Break, Resistive Case VVV 220K(2) 62
Assist III 900C 21
Assist, Has a Severe Injury ZZZ 260 66
Bad Session II 9 17
Bad Indicators BB 2 2
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
SYMPTOM NO. NO. HOLE
Bad Auditing, Previous FF 6 11
Blows, Course or Org VV 22 41
Breaks in Session TT 20 39
Critical Pc GG 7 12
Crossed Rudiments HH 8 13
Drugs LL 12 30
Drugs, Poor Ethics History VVV 220E(1) 47
Drugs, No F/N on Rehabs VVV 220E(1) 47
Engram LX1 VVV 220H(3) 53
Engram Matching PT Dangers VVV 22L 59
Ethics, Poor History VVV 220E(1) 47
Exteriorization, Case Cannot QQ 17 35
Exteriorization Bypassed NN 14 32
Exteriorization, Overrun QQQ 170 36
F/N, Bypassed in Session OO 15 33
F/N, Complaints About EE 5 10
F/N, Packed Up PP 16 34
Gains Invalidated UU 21 40
Green Form CCC 300 4
Green Form or Ruds CC 3 3
High TA, Chronic DDD 400 8
High TA, Ruds DD 4 7
Ill, Physically Ill YYY 250B 64
Incomplete Actions III 900 18
Invalidation of Gains UU 21 40
List Errors
List Errors in
1. Lists Recent JJ 10A 22
2. Earlier List Available JJ 10B 23
3. Old Earlier List Not Available JJ 10C 24
4. Recent Lists Not Available JJ 10D 25
5. Item but no F/N JJJ 100E 26
6. S&D, List Error JJJ 100H 27
7. Persistent Item JJJ 100J 28
LX3, Assessment Engram VVV 200H(1) 51
LX2, Assessment Secondary VVV 220H(2) 52
LX1, Assessment Engram VVV 220H(3) 53
Long Session VV 22 41
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
SYMPTOM NO. NO. HOLE
Money, Has Problem With RR 18 37
Out Ruds DDD 400A 9
Out Ruds, ARC Break Needle HHH 800B 16
Process Split by a Break TT 20 39
PTP, Repeating HHH 800B 16
PTS, Environmental Menace YYY 250C 65
Resistive Cases
Assessment 7 Cases VV 22 41
Doesn't Want Auditing VV 22A 42
Recall Pretending to F/N VV 22B 43
Prevent Auditing Auditing VV 22C 44
Drugs VVV 220D + E 45
Drugs Poor Ethics VVV 220E(1) 46
Drugs Overts VVV 220E(1) 47
Former Therapy VVV 220F 48
Earlier Practices VVV 220G 49
Out Valence VVV 220H 50
LX1 List VVV 220H(3) 53
LX1, Assessment to Grief or Loss VVV 220H(4) 54
Overts VV 22I 55
Grades VV 22J 56
Rudiments VV 22K 57
Rudiments VVV 220K(1) 58
Physically Ill VV 22M 60
Had been Physically Ill VVV 220M(1) 61
ARC Breaks VVV 220K(2) 62
Rock slam, Hard to Clean III 900A 19
Rock slam, At the Examiner III 900B 20
Roller-Coaster VV 22 41
Rudiments, Resistive Case VV 22I 55
To F/N AA 1 1
OR Green Form CC 3 3
Fly All BB 2 2
Protesting in Session HHH 800 14
S&D
List Errors JJJ 100H 27
WSU YYY 250 61
Flubbed YYY 250A 61
Unskilled Auditor YYY 250B 62
Sec Checks ZZZ 260D 65
Secondary LX1, Grief and Loss VVV 220H(4) 54
SYMPTOM DIRECTION PIGEON
SYMPTOM NO. NO. HOLE
Solid, Bank gone Solid SS 19 38
Thick Folder, Resistive Case VV 22 41
Tiredness MM 13 31
Unwarranted Sec Checks ZZZ 260D 65
Valence Recall another Person,
Engram or Chain VVV 220H 50
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1971, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 SEPTEMBER 1971R
REVISED 19 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Also Dn Text
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 59R
DIANETIC LIST ERRORS
It can happen that a Dianetic list of somatics, pains, emotions and
attitudes can act as a list under the meaning of the Laws of Listing and
Nulling as per HCOB I August 68.
The most violent session ARC Brks occur because of list errors under
the meaning of listing and nulling. Other session ARC Brks even under
withholds are not as violent as those occurring because of listing errors.
Therefore when a violent or even a "total-apathy-won't-answer" session
upset has occurred in Dianetics, one must suspect that the preclear is
reacting under the laws of listing and nulling and that he conceives such
an error to have been made.
The repair action is to assess the prepared list which corrects listing
errors. This is L4BRA-HCOB 15 Dec 68 amended to 18 March 71.
It is used "On Dianetics lists" as the start of each of its questions
when employed for this purpose.
When a pc has not done well on Dianetics and when no other reason can
be found the C/S should suspect some listing error and order an L4BRA to be
done "On Dianetic lists " at the start of each question.
Each read obtained on the list is carried earlier similar to F/N as per
HCOB 14 Mar 71 "F/N Everything" or, preferably the list is found in the
folder and properly handled in accordance with what read on L4BRA.
Dianetic lists can be carried to an item that blows down and F/Ns.
This does not mean the item found is now wholly clean. Even though it
F/Ned it will in most cases need to be run on secondaries and/or engrams
(R3RA Quad) to erasure and full Dianetic end phenomena. (Ref: New Era
Dianetics Series 1 through 18.)
A C/S must be alert to the fact that:
(a) Extreme upsets and deep apathies are almost always list errors.
(b) That a Dianetic list can be conceived to be a formal list and
can behave that way.
(c) L4BRA is the correction list used in such cases.
(d) Laws of Listing and Nulling HCOB 1 August 1968 can sometimes
apply to Dianetic lists.
Very few Dianetic lists behave this way but when they do they must be
handled as above.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo REVISED 1 APRIL 1978
PR Hats (Revision in this type style)
Auditors
TONE SCALE IN FULL
TONE SCALE EXPANDED KNOW TO MYSTERY SCALE
SERENITY OF BEINGNESS 40.0 KNOW
POSTULATES 30.0 NOT KNOW
GAMES 22.0 KNOW ABOUT
ACTION 20.0 LOOK
EXHILARATION 8.0 PLUS EMOTION
AESTHETIC 6.0
ENTHUSIASM 4.0
CHEERFULNESS 3.5
STRONG INTEREST 3.3
CONSERVATISM 3.0
MILD INTEREST 2.9
CONTENTED 2.8
DISINTERESTED 2.6
BOREDOM 2.5
MONOTONY 2.4
ANTAGONISM 2.0 MINUS EMOTION
HOSTILITY 1.9
PAIN 1.8
ANGER 1.5
HATE 1.4
RESENTMENT 1.3
NO SYMPATHY 1.2
UNEXPRESSED RESENTMENT 1.15
COVERT HOSTILITY 1.1
ANXIETY 1.02
FEAR 1.0
DESPAIR .98
TERROR .96
NUMB .94
SYMPATHY .9
PROPITIATION-(Higher Toned-Selectively Gives) .8
GRIEF .5
MAKING AMENDS-(Propitiation-Can't W/H Anything) .375
UNDESERVING .3
SELF-ABASEMENT .2
VICTIM .1
HOPELESS .07
APATHY .05
USELESS .03
DYING .01
BODY DEATH 0.0
FAILURE -0.01
PITY -0.1
SHAME-(BEING OTHER BODIES) -0.2
ACCOUNTABLE -0.7
BLAME-(PUNISHING OTHER BODIES) -1.0
REGRET-(RESPONSIBILITY AS BLAME) -1.3
CONTROLLING BODIES - 1.5 EFFORT
PROTECTING BODIES -2.2
OWNING BODIES -3.0 THINK
APPROVAL FROM BODIES -3.5
NEEDING BODIES -4.0 SYMBOLS
WORSHIPPING BODIES -5.0 EAT
SACRIFICE -6.0 SEX
HIDING -8.0 MYSTERY
BEING OBJECTS - 10.0 WAIT
BEING NOTHING -20.0 UNCONSCIOUS
CAN'T HIDE -30.0
TOTAL FAILURE -40.0 UNKNOWABLE
LRH:ams.dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971,1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1971R
REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
Add to
E-Meter Books (Revisions in this type style)
Chkshts (References to footplates have been deleted.)
FALSE TA
Some pcs have a very difficult time in auditing due solely to can
(electrode) outnesses.
Some auditors have heavy losses because they do not realize the
troubles that can come from electrodes and thus remedy them.
TA USE
The TA must be between 2 and 3 for a correct F/N.
When the TA is reading falsely a pc can be butchered.
Example: Auditor talking the TA down. It gets to "3.1" by his meter. So
he gets the pc to talk a bit more to get the TA between 2 and 3 and F/N.
The TA suddenly rises to 3.8.
Pc and auditor go desperate. What has happened is that the TA was a
false read. It was really reading 2.9 and F/Ning but for reasons given
below it read "3.1." Thus the auditor overran the F/N and by keeping on
invalidated the release, pulled the pc's attention out of session and
demanded more than the pc had to give.
Example: Auditor two-way communicating with pc to get the TA up from
"1.8." The TA suddenly sinks to 1.6, pc goes into apathy.
What happened was a missed F/N. For reasons covered below the TA at 1.8
was false and was really at 2.1 and F/Ning.
Example: Pc being asked for an earlier similar incident because TA is
at "4.0." Pc can't get one, gets desperate, TA goes to 5.0.
For reasons given below the TA was at 3.0 but was reading falsely at
"4.0."
Some cases get upset at the very idea of F/N when these mistakes are
made.
More than one case has missed all his wins for a year because of a
false TA.
So it is very important to know how a false TA comes about and how to
avoid it.
A properly set up meter with cans (electrodes) fitted to a pc who is
holding them properly IS AL WA YS CORRECT.
However, totally false tone arm readings can exist and an auditor must
know how these come about.
TRIM
A meter can be improperly trimmed (not set at 2.0 with the trim knob)
and can give a false TA position.
Further, when a meter is not left on a minute or two before trimming,
it can drift in the session and give a slightly false TA.
The trim can be quietly checked in mid-session by snapping out the jack
where the cord goes into the box and putting the TA on 2, seeing if the
needle is now on SET. If
not, the trim knob can be moved to adjust it. The jack is quietly slipped
back in. All without distracting the pc.
DISCHARGED
A cadmium cell meter discharges very suddenly when it does go flat.
In mid-session the meter can run out of battery. The TA will cease to
act well and may go very false.
The remedy is to keep a meter charged at least one hour for every 10 of
auditing for 240 AC volt charging current, or 2 hours for every 10 of
auditing on a 110 AC volt charging current.
A meter lasts much longer than this in practice but the above is very
safe.
Before each session snap the knob over to TEST. The needle should hit
hard on the right side of the face. It can even bounce. This guarantees
lots of charge in the battery and no chance of a meter going flat in
session.
If the needle doesn't snap to the right hard or if it doesn't quite get
there on TEST, then that meter will go flat in mid-session and give false
TA and no reads or TA on hot subjects.
ONE-HAND ELECTRODE
A single hand electrode with two terminals separated by a rubber works.
BUT it always gives a falsely high TA.
A Solo auditor who does not know this can get a release point and go
half mad wondering why he is F/Ning at 4.0!
The answer is to make a "single hand" electrode out of two small cans
(about 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 1/2 cm by 5 1/2 cm) (or even
smaller for a very small handed pc). Glue a thin circle of foam rubber
solidly to the bottom of one can so it reaches out slightly around the
bottom. (Don't glue it up the sides.)
Put the alligator jaw clips one to each can. Now put the can bottoms
together and hold them in one hand. Mark the TA (1)-meaning one hand (such
as 3.75 (1) ). Now take the cans one in each hand and mark the TA (2)-
meaning two hands (such as 3.0 (2) ).
Audit with them in one hand. Keep your worksheets with (1) marks (such
as 3.5 (1) ). Check at start and middle and end by taking a can in each
hand and putting down the 2 can read (such as 2.5 (2) ).
It is too much trouble to totally change cans and the distraction can
change the TA read.
This two small can arrangement is not quite accurate. It gives a lower
TA than big cans. But the difference is slight. It can scare you with a 1.9
when trim is 2.0 and real TA is 2.0. If this happens check with big cans.
(As an added tip a Solo auditor usually keeps the back of his hand on
his leg while Solo auditing. The small 7 1/2 volt current gives a tingle to
the leg that is distracting when one's hand is moist. Put a piece of foam
rubber in a plastic sack. Lay the sack on the leg, put your hand on this
pad. It insulates the area and is very comfortable. )
MOIST HANDS
When a pc's hands sweat a lot you will get a low TA.
Contrary to 19th century superstition the meter does not work on sweat.
Very sweaty hands as found on nervous persons gives a false TA. It goes
low.
Many "low TA cases" are just sweaty hand cases.
Paper handkerchiefs (Kleenex) are a standard item for an auditing room-for
grief charges and burning eyes, etc. These should be available.
If the TA is low, check if the pc's hands are wet. If so have him wipe
them and get a new read. It is usually found that the 1.6 was really 2.0.
Or the 1.6 was really 1.8 and the trim was 1.8 = 2.0.
Have the pc wipe hands, check and correct trim before you bypass all a
"low TAs" F/Ns!
TAs can go low. Invalidation of the pc, lousy TRs can drive one low. If
so the TA comes back up on repair.
But don't brand a case a low TA case until you make sure his hands are
dried and the meter trimmed.
Also, very small cans or cans too small for the pc can give a slightly
low reading.
DRY HANDS
Some pcs have extremely dry hands, usually from industrial chemicals
such as chlorine in dishwater or skin scale.
This can give a wildly high TA.
The pc can be worried to death with high TA repairs when in fact he
just doesn't have contact with the electrode.
A quick test is have the pc put the cans under his armpits and you'll
see if it's his calloused or chemically dried out hands.
ARTHRITIC HANDS
A rare pc is so crippled with arthritis that he doesn't make contact
fully with the cans.
This gives a high TA.
Use wide wrist straps and you'll get a right read.
SLACK GRIP
Sometimes a rare pc lets his hands go slack on the cans, particularly
if they are the wrong size cans, too big.
This gives a mysterious "high TA." It is false. The TA will come down
only to 3.2 and F/N and of course an overrun then really gives a high TA.
And the pc goes a bit frantic and begins to believe things don't erase or
release.
Keep the pc's hands in sight. Check the pc's grip. Get smaller cans.
CAN SIZE
The most common fault is wrong can size.
For a normal or large handed pc the can size is about 4 7/8ths inches
by 2 5/8ths inches or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm. This can be altered as big as 4
1/2 inches by 3 inches diameter or 11 cm by 8 cm. This is standard.
This can is too large for people with small hands. These should use a
can 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8th inches or 9 cm by 5 cm diameter or thereabouts.
A small child would be lost even with that can. So a small 35 mm film
can could be used. This is 2 inches long by 1 3/16ths diameter or 5 cm by 3
cm. This works but watch it as these cans are aluminum. They do work but
test for true read with a slightly larger can and then trim to adjust for
the aluminum if any different.
Cans of course should be STEEL with a thin tin plating. Regular soup
cans.
Can size to match the pc avoids slack can grip or tiring the hands into
going slack, giving the auditor 3.2 F/Ns and trouble.
COLD PC
A pc who is too cold sometimes has a falsely high TA.
Wrap him in a blanket or get a warmer auditing room.
The auditing environment is the responsibility of the auditor.
LATE AT NIGHT
Between 2 and 3 AM or late at night a pc's TA may be very high. The
time depends on when he sleeps usually.
This TA will be found normal in regular hours.
RINGS
Rings on the pc's hands must always be removed. They don't influence TA
but they give a false rock slam.
FLOATING TA
Many an auditor before now has gone a bit mad trying to handle a
floating TA. They are not very common and are startling.
What happens is the pc is so released the needle can't be gotten onto
the dial. The needle is swinging wider than the meter dial both ways from
center and appears to lay first on one side then the other. The TA can't be
moved fast enough to keep the extreme floating needle on the dial.
This gives a false TA of sorts as it can't be read.
Some auditors seeing it for the first time have even sent the pc out of
the room so they could "adjust" the meter or get another one!
Thus the very highest state of release can be invalidated as where is
the TA?
RUSTY CORRODED CANS
You'd think soup was very expensive the way some auditors hold onto old
cans.
Corroded cans can falsify TA. Get new ones now and then.
TIGHT SHOES
And then there was the vain lady who wore shoes too small for her feet.
She removed them every session. The session went well each time.
Then she put on her agonizing shoes and went to the Examiner and the
C/Ses and auditors all went mad trying to find out why every exam had a
high TA.
Tight shoes.
The E-Meter is accurate. It is a lovely instrument.
You have to fit the pc to it.
Good luck.
LRH:PA:nt.lf L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971, 1977 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Revised by Paulette Ausley
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 NOVEMBER 1971RA
Remimeo REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
E-Meter Books (Revisions in this type style)
Studies
Checksheets FALSE TA ADDITION
(Refers and adds to HCOB 24 Oct 1971R
"False TA.")
COLD CANS
Regardless of can size, cold E-Meter electrodes tend to give a much
higher tone arm reading particularly on some pcs.
Until the cans warm up, the reading is generally false and is false in
the direction of high.
A chilled pc almost always has a high TA until he or she gets warm.
Just throwing a coat over the pc's shoulders can bring down a TA in a cool
room. But some pcs are "cool blooded" and the shock of ice cold cans can
drive the TA up and it takes a while to drift down.
This has a great effect on examinations where the cans are used very
briefly.
A practice which gets around this is for the auditor or Examiner to
hold the cans briefly until they are warm and then give them to the pc. A
variation is for the auditor or Examiner to put the cans under his armpits
while setting up. This warms them.
There are probably many other ways to warm up cans to body temperature.
FOOTPLATES
Tests show that footplates do not read on the meter. The use of
footplates is thereby cancelled.
PCs WHO FALSIFY
Some pcs (rare) take mistaken pride in being able to push the TA up by
straining or tensing.
By just moving into the body the TA can be sent up by an otherwise
exterior pc.
Some pcs also take a road out by "getting an F/N at will." They have
various tricks that do this, the main one being to "think of something
else" and get an F/N.
Any of these (rare) pcs are manifesting out-of-sessionness. They aren't
in session.
The definition of in session is "interested in own case and willing to
talk to the auditor." Remedy that and they cease such tricks.
Usually they aren't being run on what they are interested in or have comm
blocks or withholds or no confidence. They are easy to detect and easy to
handle.
LRH:PA:nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (g) 1971, 1973, 1977 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard Revised by
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Paulette Ausley
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1972R
REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
All Tech/Qual
Terminals (Revisions in this type style)
FALSE TA ADDITION 2
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA
C/S Series 53 HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT
INT-EXT CORRECTION LIST
There is an infinity of wrong ways to get a pc to read between 2.0 and
3.0 on an E-Meter.
One method would be to shoot him. Dead bodies read between 2.0 and 3.0.
Another way is to throw the trim knob off.
Yet another wrong way is to use HAND CREAM to make the TA go lower and
call "F/Ns" at 4.0 on an actual read.
An auditor who is not very expert is apt to find strange ways to do
things because the usual is beyond his skill.
A GOOD auditor handles low and high TAs with HCOB 24 Oct 71R and
Addition 12 Nov 71RA and this HCOB "False TA," C/S Series 53 and the Hi-Lo
TA Assessment.
The commonest sources of high TA are PROTEST, OVERTS and out
INTERIORIZATION RD and too big or too small cans.
The commonest sources of low TA are overwhelming auditor TRs or wet
sweaty hands.
The subject is not open to experimentation. If a pc's TA is low or high
and you don't correct it with the usual remedies mentioned above, the pc
goes into the soup.
GOOD AUDITORS KNOW THEIR TECH AND USE IT TO REMEDY HIGH AND LOW TAs.
GOOD AUDITORS DO HONEST WORKSHEETS AND HONEST AUDITING.
BE A GOOD AUDITOR.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ne.nt
Copyright � 1972, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 FEBRUARY 1972R
Issue I
REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(References for footplates have been deleted.)
FALSE TA ADDITION 3
(There are now four False TA HCOBs including this one.
These were issued as more data was uncovered:
HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA ADDITION
HCOB15 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
and this one
HCOB18 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 3.)
A meter is a meter.
Meters are used to measure water, natural gas, and many other things.
An E meter is used to measure a pc.
If you rig a meter up so as to falsify its reads you get a wrong
result.
You could rig up a water meter so it read that twice as much water had
flowed and then sit around and wonder all week why the swimming pool never
filled up.
The ACCURACY of a meter depends upon its being honestly set up and
honestly used.
The HONESTY of the auditor determines his results.
The whole field of psychotherapy was dishonest from the days of witch
doctors to psychiatry. Falsified data came from lack of knowledge of the
mind. This made its practitioners DISHONEST.
We do not and must not follow that fatal road.
The technology we have WORKS to definite positive predictable results.
Results are obtained if the auditor has honestly studied and understood
his materials and honestly applies them.
Falsifying study leads to falsifying meters and this gives bad results
on pcs.
HONEST use of the materials and the meter gives an honest result.
One who does not know his materials and who cannot do his drills then
thinks he has to make a meter cheat.
HONEST use of the meter by an HONEST auditor is the route to GOOD
RESULTS .
LOW TAs
A bad practice has arisen to "beat" the low TA.
This is to have the pc wipe his hands every few minutes to get the TA up
above 2.0.
Not only does this distract the pc and yank him out of session, but it
is by inference putting his attention on the meter, a thing a good auditor
does NOT do in a formal session. The pc's attention must be on his own case
in a session, not on the meter or his hands.
But the best answer is to get the pc up scale so he doesn't have
perspiring hands.
Overwhelming TRs is the commonest reason for low TAs. Not all the hand
wiping in the world will cure poor TRs.
Some auditors "spook" (leap off the road like a horse frightened by
something blowing along) at the very thought of high or low TAs. This is
because they haven't got the TRs to handle a low TA nor the tech to handle
a high one.
Making a meter read falsely low with cream or falsely high with talcum
powder or wiping hands continually will not handle the pc's CASE.
That is what the auditor is there to do, not make his session look
good!
The funniest one I have ever heard was a Solo auditor who had high TA
trouble. So he used to fill up a bathtub with scalding water, fill the
bathroom full of clouds of steam and then sit in the bath, holding onto his
electrodes "Solo auditing."
It gave him a lower TA but it sure didn't give him any case result.
We maybe ought to have a contest as to who can come up with the most
comical actual instances of falsifying meter reads.
One "auditor" "solved it" by just calling F/Ns whenever she got tired
of the pc regardless of TA position. After a year or more of this she saw
the light and put herself in Ethics.
The funny part is that her co-auditor had been doing the same thing on
her!
HONEST TA IS THE BEST POLICY.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
Paulette Ausley
LRH:PA:nt
Copyright � 1972, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 MARCH 1972
Remimeo
Ethics
C/SING OR AUDITING WITHOUT
FOLDER STUDY
A two weeks loss of pay and a suspension of certs is a penalty for any
C/S or auditor who acts on a case
(1) Without an up-to-date FS
(2) Without an FES done on auditing, and:
(3) Without a preliminary study of the folder before C/Sing or auditing
(4) Who C/Ses for or delivers Quickie auditing of any level for
"completion"
(5) Who does not work for the product of a fully and utterly completed pc
on that grade
(6) Who falsifies a statistic or a worksheet.
FES Units must exist to FES folders for C/Ses.
WE MUST END ALL QUICKIE TENDENCIES IN C/Ses AND AUDITORS.
Failure to complete the pc totally and utterly on any level can cost us
our friends.
Bonuses may only be paid to C/Ses and auditors on 25 CHAIR HOURS OR
MORE A WEEK PLUS A LESSER BONUS FOR ADMIN TIME, NOT VALID WITHOUT THE CHAIR
HOURS.
NO bonuses of any kind may be paid henceforth to C/Ses or auditors for
"completions" as these lead to Quickie actions which then reduce the power
inherent in auditing.
Auditing can perform miracles. But only in HONEST HANDS.
A Comm Ev may be requested and must be given in the event of false
accusation.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1972R
Issue III
Remimeo REVISED 21 JUNE 1975
Student Hat
Staff Hats (Revision in this type style)
IMPORTANT
ETHICS AND STUDY TECH
(Cancels the issue revised 7 April 72.)
The basic WHY of the majority of cases of post nonperformance of a
staff member and OUT TECH in an org stems from misunderstood words.
The primary point that has to be gotten in is study tech.
This is also our bridge to society.
Yet study tech is the tech that includes misunderstood word tech.
Thus if study tech is not in, people on staffs see nothing wrong with
hearing or reading orders containing words they do not understand and have
no urge to look them up. Further they often feel they do know words that
they in fact do not know.
When this situation exists it is next to impossible to get study tech
and Word Clearing tech in. For, the orders seeking to get in study tech may
contain words the person does not understand. Thus he doesn't really comply
with the orders and study tech does not get in. Thus the ability to hear or
read and understand continues to be missing.
Therefore these ethics actions become part of standard ethics.
1. A PERSON MAY BE SUMMONED TO A COURT OF ETHICS OR EXECUTIVE COURT OF
ETHICS IF IT BE FOUND THAT HE HAS GONE PAST A WORD HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND
WHEN RECEIVING, HEARING OR READING AN ORDER, HCOB, POLICY LETTER OR TAPE,
ANY AND ALL LRH WRITTEN OR PRINTED MATERIALS INCLUDING BOOKS, PABS,
DESPATCHES, TELEXES AND MIMEO ISSUES WHICH RESULTED IN A FAILURE TO DO
DUTIES OF HIS POST WITHOUT HIS AT ONCE MAKING AN EFFECTIVE EFFORT TO CLEAR
THE WORDS ON HIMSELF, WHETHER HE KNEW HE WAS MISSING THEM OR NOT AS THE
SOURCE OF HIS INACTION OR DAMAGING ACTIONS.
The charge is NEGLECTING TO CLARIFY WORDS NOT UNDERSTOOD.
2. A STAFF MEMBER WHO DOES NOT USE STUDY TECH OR GET IT KNOWN WHILE
STUDYING OR INSTRUCTING MAY BE SUMMONED TO A COURT OF ETHICS OR AN
EXECUTIVE COURT OF ETHICS.
The charge is FAILURE TO EMPLOY STUDY TECH.
3. A STUDENT ALTER-ISING OR MISADVISING OTHERS ON THE USE OF STUDY TECH
MAY BE SUMMONED BEFORE A COURT OF ETHICS.
The charge is ADVOCATING A MISUSE OR NEGLECT OF PROPER STUDY TECH.
4. AN AUDITOR FAILING TO CLEAR EACH AND EVERY WORD OF EVERY COMMAND OR
LIST USED MAY BE SUMMONED BEFORE A COURT OF ETHICS.
The charge is OUT TECH.
5. ANY PUBLIC DIVISION PERSON, STAFF MEMBER OR SCIENTOLOGIST FOUND USING
TERMS, CIRCUMSTANCES OR DATA ON RAW PUBLIC IN PUBLIC LECTURES OR PROMOTION
OR IN PR BEYOND THE PUBLIC ABILITY TO GRASP WITHOUT STRESSING STUDY TECH OR
AT ONCE TAKING EFFECTIVE MEASURES TO CLARIFY OR RELEASING MATERIALS BROADLY
TO A WRONG PUBLIC MAY BE SUMMONED TO A COURT OF ETHICS IF ANY FLAP OR UPSET
RESULTS.
The charge is FAILURE TO APPLY STUDY TECH IN DISSEMINATION.
SUPPRESSIVE
Furthermore, as study tech is our primary bridge to society and the
basic prevention of out tech and out admin, if any offense as above found
guilty in a Court of Ethics is REPEATED and the person has had two such
Courts on this offense the person may be summoned before a Committee of
Evidence on a charge of COMMITTING AN ACT OR OMISSION UNDERTAKEN TO
KNOWINGLY SUPPRESS, REDUCE OR IMPEDE SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS and if
found guilty beyond reasonable doubt may be declared a SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
and expelled with full penalties.
AXIOM 28
Failures to teach, or use study tech or alterations of study tech are
actually offenses against AXIOM 28 as it is applied internally in an org on
admin and tech and from the org to society.
Study tech including its technology of Word Clearing is in fact the
technology of Axiom 28.
The Axiom (amended) follows:
AXIOM 28. COMMUNICATION IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ACTION OF IMPELLING AN
IMPULSE OR PARTICLE FROM SOURCE-POINT ACROSS A DISTANCE TO RECEIPT-
POINT, WITH THE INTENTION OF BRINGING INTO BEING AT THE RECEIPT-POINT A
DUPLICATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF THAT WHICH EMANATED FROM THE SOURCE-
POINT.
The formula of Communication is: Cause, Distance, Effect with
Intention, Attention and Duplication WITH UNDERSTANDING.
The component parts of Communication are Consideration, Intention,
Attention, Cause, Source-point, Distance, Effect, Receipt-point,
Duplication, Understanding, the Velocity of the impulse or particle,
Nothingness or Somethingness. A non-communication consists of Barriers.
Barriers consist of Space, Interpositions (such as walls and screens of
fast-moving particles), and Time. A communication by definition, does
not need to be two-way. When a communication is returned, the formula
is repeated, with the receipt-point now becoming a source-point and the
former source-point now becoming a receipt-point.
LRH:ldv L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972. 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
L. Ron Hubbard
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE
LRH ED 176 INT 24 April 1972
Reissued
To: C/O, ED 11 April 1977
Tech Sec Cancels all other
versions of LRH ED 176
Subject: AUDITOR RECOVERY
(Reissued as statistically by far the most
successful version of LRH ED 176 ever issued.
This is the original LRH version of the ED.)
Reference: LRH ED 174 INT STUDY AND TECH BREAKTHROUGH
HCO PL 9 April 72 CORRECT DANGER CONDITION
HCOB 30 Mar 72 PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
HCOB 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND
WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION
SITUATION: It quite often happens that an org has an auditor that stops
producing or doesn't produce or blows or ceases to audit.
Investigation has revealed that the auditor situation is similar to
that of students who blow for lack of study tech.
Each auditor who lets down has a WHY and has misunderstood words or has
not really checked out on his current tech. Thus they foul up, let down or
blow.
As orgs sometimes find it hard to get auditors, the situation can be
very hard on the C/O or ED and Tech Sec unless it is handled.
STATS: Well Done Auditing Hour stats very low in some orgs and backlogs in
many.
WHY: Auditors can ease off or cease auditing for individual WHYs for each
auditor.
IDEAL SCENE: All auditors auditing more than their minimum and happily on
post.
HANDLING:
1. Compile three lists of auditors (a) who have left but are still in
area or (b) who want to leave the org or (c) who are not getting out
their hours.
HAS. _________
2. M4 and study the Data Series so as to know what a WHY is, and the
above references. Dir of Pers Enhancement (or Qual Sec or as designated
or done by the C/O or ED). _________
3. Call in auditors on lists (b) and (c) whether on tech posts or admin.
Assess both Trouble Area Lists in the P/L 9 April 72 Issue III. Fly
each read with 2-way comm and earlier similar and keep a worksheet of
the auditor's answers. Find the WHY of the letdown in auditing. If not
directly apparent from answers given, and is not obvious (such as PTS
or missed words or no study tech or has not read materials or other
very apparent reasons) then you can list to a BD F/N item the question
"What reason do you have for not auditing?" The BD F/N item will be
their Why. Write it below the Trouble Area Assessment in the space
provided.
DIR OF PERS E OR
THE C/O OR ED
DESIGNATED PERSON. _________
4. See that action is done to remedy the WHY, whatever it was. It will
be the 1st Dynamic Danger Formula of that P/L completed.
HAS. _________
5. Do the same with list (a) in 1 above.
SAME PERSON WHO
DID 3 ABOVE. _________
6. See that they apply 1st Dynamic formula.
HAS. _________
7. Try to get some of list (a) to join the org staff.
HAS. _________
8. Get all org auditors and supervisors through the Primary Correction
Rundown HCOB 30 Mar 72, allowing for those steps already done
previously on LRH ED 174 INT or lists (b) and (c).
QUAL SEC. _________
9. Correct any wrong Whys found using C/S Series 78 HCOB 20 April 72 by
correct C/Sing and handling.
ORG C/S. _________
Completely aside from remedying any out tech you may have, and the
personal benefit the auditors will receive, this should solve any auditor
scarcity problem.
It is a very effective program.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Reissue proposed by
CS-4/5
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JE:mes.lf
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 MAY 1972R
REVISED 18 December 1977
Remimeo
Executive Hats
(Revision in this type style)
IMPORTANT
Executive Series 12
ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES
Any person holding an executive post (head of department or above) is
deemed an EXECUTIVE.
Evaluation has revealed that the breakdown in many orgs is a failure on
the part of executives to wear their ethics and justice hats.
It has been found that below administrative Whys there is usually an
ethics situation as well which unhandled, causes the administrative Why not
to function or raise stats.
In an area which is downstat, it is the duty of an executive to
investigate and find any out-ethics situation and get it corrected.
Ethics is a personal thing in relation to a group. Unethical people are
those who do not have ethics in on themselves personally.
It is the responsibility of the executive to see to it that persons
under his control and in his area get their personal ethics in and keep
them in.
Dishonesty, false reports, an out-ethics personal life, should be
looked for and by persuasion, should be corrected.
When an executive sees such things he or she must do all he can to get
the person to get his own ethics in.
When an area is downstat the executive must at once suspect an out-
ethics scene with one or more of the personnel and must investigate and
persuade the person to be more honest and ethical and correct the out-
ethics condition found.
If this does not correct and if the person or area remains downstat,
the executive must declare the person or area in Danger and apply HCO PL 9
Apr 72 "CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING."
The situation, if it does not correct, thereafter becomes a matter of
full group justice with Courts and Comm Evs. Persons whose ethics have
remained out must be replaced.
The seniors of an executive are bound to enforce this policy and to use
it on any executives whose personal ethics are out and who fail to apply
it. It will be found that those who do not apply this policy letter have
themselves certain dishonesties or out-ethics situations.
IT IS VITAL TO ANY ORGANIZATION, TO BE STRONG AND EFFECTIVE, TO BE
ETHICAL.
THE MOST IMPORTANT ZONE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT IN AN ORGANIZATION IS AT OR
NEAR THE TOP.
Ethical failure at the top or just below it can destroy an organization and
make it downstat.
Historical examples are many.
THEREFORE IT IS POLICY THAT AN EXECUTIVE MUST KEEP ETHICS IN ON HIMSELF
AND THOSE BELOW HIM OR BE DISCIPLINED OR COMM EVED AND REMOVED FROM ANY
POST OF AUTHORITY AND SOMEONE FOUND WHO IS HIMSELF ETHICAL AND CAN KEEP
ETHICS IN ON THOSE UNDER HIS AUTHORITY.
The charge in any such case for a staff member or executive is FAILURE
TO UPHOLD OR SET AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH ETHICAL STANDARDS.
Such offenses are composed of
1. DISHONESTY.
2. Use of false statements to cover up a situation.
3. Representing a scene to be different than it actually is to cover up
crimes and escape discipline.
4. Irregular 2D connections and practices.
5. Drug or alcoholic addiction.
6. Encouraging out-ethics.
7. Condoning or failing to effectively handle an out-ethics situation in
self or others as an in-charge, officer or executive.
TECHNICAL
People with out-ethics withholds cannot see. This is proven by the
brilliant return of perception of the environment in people audited
effectively and at length on such processes.
Such people also seek to place a false environment there and actually
see a false environment.
People whose ethics are low will enturbulate and upset a group as they
are seeking to justify their harmful acts against the group. And this leads
to more harmful acts.
Out-ethics people go rapidly into Treason against the group.
A person whose ethics have been out over a long period goes "out of
valence." They are "not themselves."
Happiness is only attained by those who are HONEST with themselves and
others.
A group prospers only when each member in it has his own personal
ethics in.
Even in a PTS (Potential Trouble Source) person there must have been
outethics conduct toward the suppressive personality he or she is connected
with for the person to have become PTS in the first place.
People who are physically ill are PTS and are out-ethics toward the
person or thing they are PTS to!
Thus a group to be happy and well, and for the group to prosper and endure,
its individual members must have their own ethics in.
It is up to the executive or officer to see that this is the case and
to DO the actions necessary to make it come about and the group an ethical
group.
EXEC OR OFFICERS STEPS
FOR GETTING IN ETHICS
ON A STAFF MEMBER
STEP ONE
Inform the person personally he is in Danger Condition by reason of
acts or omissions, downstate false reports or absence or 2D or whatever the
circumstances are.
He is in fact IN danger because somebody is going to act sooner or
later to hit him.
He may be involved already in some other assignment of condition.
But this is between you and him.
HE IS IN DANGER BECAUSE YOU ARE HAVING TO BYPASS HIM TO GET HIS ETHICS
IN, A THING HE SHOULD DO HIMSELF.
If he cooperates and completes this rundown and it comes out all right
you will help him.
If he doesn't cooperate you will have to use group justice procedures.
This is his chance to get ethics in on himself with your help before he
really crashes.
When he accepts this fact, Step 1 is done. Go to Step 2.
STEP 2
Ethics is gotten in by definition on the person.
GET IN THE DEFINITIONS FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
The following words must be Method 4 Word Cleared on all the words and
the words in their definitions on the person being handled.
"ETHICS: The study of the general nature of morals (morals (plural)
(noun): The principles of right and wrong conduct) and the specific moral
choices to be made by the individual in his relationship with others."
"The rules or standards governing the conduct of the members of a
profession."
"JUSTICE: 1. Moral rightness; equity. 2. Honor, Fairness. 3. Good
reason. 4. Fair handling: due reward or treatment. 5. The administration
and procedure of the law."
"FALSE: Contrary to fact or truth; without grounds; incorrect. Without
meaning or sincerity; deceiving. Not keeping faith. Treacherous. Resembling
and being identified as a similar or related entity."
"DISHONEST: Disposed to lie, cheat, defraud or deceive."
"PRETENSE: A false reason or excuse. A mere show without reality."
"BETRAY: To be disloyal or faithless to."
"OUT-ETHICS: An action or situation in which an individual is involved
contrary to the ideals and best interests of his group. An act or situation
or relationship contrary to the ethics standards, codes or ideals of the
group or other members of the group. An act of omission or commission by an
individual that could or has reduced the general effectiveness of a group
or its other members. An individual act of omission or commission which
impedes the general well-being of a group or impedes it in achieving its
goals."
Do not go to Step 3 of this until all the above words are cleared by
Method 4 Word Clearing.
STEP 3
Ask the person what out-ethics situation he or she is involved in.
It may take the person some time to think of it or he may suppress it
and be afraid to say it for fear of consequences. Reassure him that you are
only trying to help him.
He may have brought it up in a session but did not apply it as out-
ethics. Coax him through this.
If his conduct and actions are poor or downstat, he for sure will be
able to come up with an out-ethics personal scene.
Sometimes the person is secretly PTS and is connected to a suppressive
or antagonistic person or group or thing. In such an instance he will
roller-coaster as a case or on post or have accidents or be ill frequently.
(See PTS tech for material on this and for future handling. Checksheet BPL
31 May 1971RF Issue IV PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING
CHECKSHEET, but go on handling with these steps.)
Sometimes the person just uses PR (brags it up and won't come clean).
In this case, an auditing session is required.
If the person gets involved in self-listing get him audited on HCOB 20
Apr 72, C/S Series 78, which gives the auditing session procedure. A person
can become very upset over a wrong item. It is easily repaired but it must
be repaired if this happens.
By your own 2WC or whatever means or repair get this Step 3 to a clear-
cut out-ethics situation, clearly stated. Do not forget to go on with this
eventually if there is a delay in completing it. GIs will be in if correct.
STEP 4
Have the person work out how the out-ethics situation in which he or
she is involved would be a betrayal of the group or make them false to the
group or its ideals.
Do not make the person guilty. Just get them to see it themselves.
When they have seen this clearly and have cognited on it completely go
to next step.
STEP 5
The person is now ready to apply the FIRST DYNAMIC DANGER FORMULA to
himself.
Give him this formula and explain it to him.
FIRST DYNAMIC FORMULA
The formula is converted for the first dynamic to
1st 1. Bypass habits or normal routines.
1st 2. Handle the situation and any danger in it.
1st 3. Assign self a Danger Condition.
1st 4. Get in your own personal ethics by finding what you are doing
that is out-ethics and use self-discipline to correct it and get
honest and straight.
1st 5. Reorganize your life so that the dangerous situation is not
continually happening to you.
1st 6. Formulate and adopt firm policy that will hereafter detect and
prevent the same situation from continuing to occur.
Now usually the person is already involved in another group situation
of downstats or overt products or bad appearance or low conditions, Courts,
Comm Evs for something.
It does not matter what other condition he was in. From you he is in
Danger.
So 1st 1. and 1st 2. above apply to the group situation he finds
himself in.
He has to assign himself a Danger Condition as he recognizes now he has
been in danger from himself.
1st 4. has been begun by this rundown.
It is up to him or her to finish off 1st 4. by applying the material in
steps 2 and 3. He or she has to use self-discipline to correct his own out-
ethics scene and get it honest and straight, with himself and the group.
1st 5. is obvious. If he doesn't, he will just crash again.
1st 6. In formulating and adopting firm policy he must be sure it
aligns with the group endeavor.
When he has worked all this out AND DEMONSTRATED IT IN LIFE, he has
completed the personal danger rundown.
He can then assign himself Emergency and follow the Emergency Formula
(HCO PL 23 Sep 67, Pg 189-190 Vol 0 OEC "Emergency").
STEP 6
Review the person and his stats and appearance and personal life.
Satisfy yourself that the steps above and the out-ethics found were all
of it. That no wrong item has been found. That the person is not PTS.
Handle what you find. But if you find that the person did not improve
and gave it all a brush-off, you must now take the group's point of view
and administer group justice.
Your protection of the person is at end because he had his chance and
is apparently one of those people who depend on others to keep his ethics
in for him and can't keep them in himself. So use group justice procedures
thereafter.
If the person made it and didn't fall on his head and is moving on up now
AS SHOWN BY HONEST STATS AND CONDITION OF HIS POST, you have had a nice win
and things will go much much better.
And that's a win for everybody.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by
Pat Brice LRH Comps
Unit I/C
LRH:PB.dr
Copyright � 1972, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JUNE 1972RA
Remimeo REVISED 27 FEBRUARY 1975
RE-REVISED 7 DECEMBER 1976
(Revision in this type sty/e)
C/S Series 81RA
AUDITOR'S RIGHTS MODIFIED
It occasionally (rarely) happens that an HGC's line stops and programs
do not get finished and pcs go unaudited or sent to Ethics or Cramming
instead of getting their programs completed.
It also happens that a D of P becomes incapable of getting auditors to
audit per the schedule he writes.
12 1/2 hour intensives drop out. Auditing falls back to the bit and
piece game.
The C/S finds all his work in programming wasted as the programs
staledate or just get abandoned.
Hours fall. Lines tangle. Tech Services cannot get assignments done.
THE MAJOR WHY OF THIS AND MANY SUCH CONFUSIONS CAN BE TRACED TO AN
ABUSE OF "AUDITOR'S RIGHTS" IN PICKING AND CHOOSING PCS ON THE GROUNDS OF
"FEELING THEY CANNOT HELP THE PC."
This "right" is also abused by auditors seeking pcs who F/N easily at
the Examiner.
See HCOB 15 June 72 C/S Series 80, "Dog Pcs."
The refusal to audit is in fact an admission, in most cases, of a
feared inability to audit.
Therefore, an auditor may only refuse to audit a pc if a direct
personal relationship exists such as husband and wife or some friend's wife
or familial relationship.
An auditor advising others about this or that "dog case" or seeking to
exclude pcs from auditing by abusing his "right to choose pcs" is SUBJECT
TO COMM EV AND SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATES UNTIL RETREADED.
For the real Why of it is his inability to handle TRs, meter, use the
Code or apply tech.
Nearly every "Dog Pc" has out lists or incomplete chains or is not
being run on what needs to be handled. In other words they are simply
problems in repair which modern tech handles easily. The drug case who is
audited on grades but has had no Drug Rundown is an example of
misprogramming.
The C/S can get many loses and the whole HGC go into a bedlam where you
have auditors refusing to audit. Their reasons given are false. The real
reasons involve fast F/Ns and bonuses or out TRs, metering, Code breaks and
tech.
The D of P has a right, and so does Tech Services, to assign pcs to
such and such auditors in the sequence listed without a lot of pick and
choose by the auditors.
A C/S has a right to get his programs completed.
12 1/2 hour intensive plans blow up where auditors choose their own pcs.
STATS
The stats of auditors may only be HOURS AUDITED with FES and admin
hours separately noted.
The D of P has a dual stat. The stats are: (a) Pcs Completed or out of
hours routed to Dept. 6. Penalty: If one pa not routed to the Reg. the D of
P loses stats for the day. If found that D of P is encouraging small or
inadequate Tech Estimates so that the pc frequently runs out of hours, the
D of P forfeits his stats for the day. (b) WDAHs is the second D of P stat.
When the stats are this way the C/S can get his programs done without
worry.
The D of P can get cases completed.
The D of Tech Services has the stat of Completed Intensives and
Completed Courses. Definition: The Completed Intensives stat is a 12 1/2
hour intensive completed within a period of one week. If an Ex Dn,
Introspection RD, L-Rundown, Power (or any other processing which is
delivered at other than regular rate) is fully completed and attested in
the middle of a 12 1/2 hour intensive, that last intensive may be counted
as one on the stat for that week.
HONESTY
Sanity is truth.
Truth is sanity.
The road to truth is begun with honesty.
There was the story of the "man who sold his soul for a mess of
pottage" (soup). We could parallel this with the auditor who sold his case
gain for a mess of false stats.
An honest clean job and an honest clean line are the milestones of the
road to truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
W/O Ron Shafran
in 1975
Revised by
Julie Gillespie
Training & Services Aide in
1976
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:JG:RS:nt
Copyright � 1972,1975,1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JULY 1973RB
Remimeo RE-REVISED 21 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
ASSIST SUMMARY
(Note: This Bulletin has been revised to incorporate
HCO Bulletin of 6 Jan 1974, ASSIST SUMMARY ADDITION
and to align with vital data on the New Era Dianetics Series.)
Reference:
HCOB 5 Jul 71RB C/S Series 49RB
ASSISTS
HCOB 23 Jul 71R ASSISTS
HCOB 12 Mar 69 1I PHYSICALLY ILL PCs AND PRE-OTs
HCOB 24 Apr 69RA DIANETIC USE
HCOB 14 May 69 SICKNESS
HCOB 23 May 69R AUDITING OUT SESSIONS, NAR
RATIVE VERSUS SOMATIC CHAINS
HCOB 24 Jul 69R SERIOUSLY ILL PCs
HCOB 27 Jul 69 ANTIBIOTICS
HCOB 15 Jan 70 THE USES OF AUDITING
BTB 9 Oct 67R ASSISTS FOR INJURIES
HCOB 2 Jan 71 ILLEGAL AUDITING
HCOB 15 Jul 70R UNRESOLVED PAINS
Reiss. 25 Nov 70,
Rev. 17 Jul 78
BTB 7 Apr 72R TOUCH ASSISTS, CORRECT ONES
HCOB 2 Apr 69R DIANETIC ASSISTS
HCOB 19 Jul 69RA DIANETICS AND ILLNESS
BTB 28 May 74RA FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR
INJURIES AND ILLNESSES
HCOB 24 Apr 69R DIANETIC RESULTS
Any tape or materials on "Prior Confusion"
Any tape or materials on "Postulates and Injuries"
(1952 Autumn, London Lectures, etc.)
HCOBs on mistakes being made in presence of suppression, 1968.
New Era Dianetics Series 1 through 18, especially:
HCOB 28 Jul 71RB New Era Dianetics Series 8R
Rev. 25 Jun 78, DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
Re-Rev. 22.9.78
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE
ITEM
Injuries, operations, delivery of babies, severe illnesses and periods
of intense emotional shock all deserve to be handled with thorough and
complete assists.
C/ears, OTs and Dianetic Clears are no longer run on Dianetic auditing
assists, secondaries, engrams or narrative incidents. They may however
receive Touch Assists and Contact Assists, etc. If further handling is
required a New Era Dianetics Special Rundown for OTs has been developed
which is available at AOs and Flag. (Ref: BTB 17 Sep 78 BREAKTHROUGH and
HCOB 12 Sep 78 DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs.)
New Era Dianetics assists may be done, as usual, whenever needed by
preclears.
Medical examination and diagnosis should be sought where needed, and
where treatment is routinely successful, medical treatment should be
obtained. As an assist can at
times cover up an actual injury or broken bone, no chances should be taken,
especially if the condition does not easily respond. In other words where
something is merely thought to be a slight sprain, to be on the safe side
an X-ray should be obtained, particularly if it does not at once respond.
An assist is not a substitute for medical treatment but is complementary to
it. It is even doubtful if full healing can be accomplished by medical
treatment alone and it is certain that an assist greatly speeds recovery.
In short, one should realize that physical healing does not take into
account the being and the repercussion on the spiritual beingness of the
person.
Injury and illness are PREDISPOSED by the spiritual state of the
person. They are PRECIPITATED by the being himself as a manifestation of
his current spiritual condition. And they are PROLONGED by any failure to
fully handle the spiritual factors associated with them.
The causes of PREDISPOSITION, PRECIPITATION and PROLONGATION are
basically the following:
1. Postulates.
2. Engrams.
3. Secondaries.
4. ARC breaks with the environment, situations, others or the
body part.
5. Problems.
6. Overt acts.
7. Withholds.
8. Out of communicationness.
The purely physical facts of injuries, illnesses and stresses are
themselves incapacitating and do themselves often require physical analysis
and treatment by a doctor or nutritionist. These could be briefly
catalogued as:
A. Physical damage to structure.
B. Disease of a pathological nature.
C. Inadequacies of structure.
D. Excessive structure.
E. Nutritional errors.
F. Nutritional inadequacies.
G. Vitamin and bio-compound excesses.
H. Vitamin and bio-compound deficiencies.
I. Mineral excesses.
J. Mineral deficiencies.
K. Structural malfunction.
L. Erroneous examination.
M. Erroneous diagnosis.
N. Erroneous structural treatment.
O. Erroneous medication.
There is another group which belongs to both the spiritual and physical
divisions. These are:
i. Allergies
ii. Addictions
iii. Habits
iv. Neglect v. Decay.
Any of these things in any of the three groups can be a cause of non-
optimum personal existence.
We are not discussing here the full handling of any of these groups or
what optimum state can be attained or maintained. But it should be obvious
that there is a level below which life is not very tolerable. How well a
person can be or how efficient or how active is another subject entirely.
Certainly life is not very tolerable to a person who has been injured
or ill, to a woman who has just delivered a baby, to a person who has just
suffered a heavy emotional shock. And there is no reason a person should
remain in such a low state, particularly for weeks, months or years when he
or she could be remarkably ASSISTED to recover in hours, days or weeks.
It is in fact a sort of practiced cruelty to insist by neglect that a
person continue on in such a state when one can learn and practice and
obtain relief for such a person.
We are mainly concerned with the first group, 1-8. The group is not
listed in the order that it is done but in the order that it has influence
upon the being.
The idea has grown that one handles injuries with Touch Assists only.
This is true for someone who as an auditor has only a smattering of
Scientology. It is true for someone in such pain or state of case (which
would have to be pretty bad) that he cannot respond to actual auditing.
But a Scientologist really has no business "having only a smattering"
of auditing skills that could save his or the lives of others. And the case
is very rare who cannot experience proper auditing.
The actual cause of not handling such conditions is, then, to be found
as iv. NEGLECT. And where there is neglect, v. DECAY is very likely to
follow.
One does not have to be a medical doctor to take someone to a medical
doctor. And one does not have to be a medical doctor to observe that
medical treatment may not be helping the patient. And one does not have to
be a medical doctor to handle things caused spiritually by the being
himself.
Just as there are two sides to healing-the spiritual and the structural
or physical, there are also two states that can be spiritually attained.
The first of these states might be classified as "humanly tolerable."
Assists come under this heading. The second is spiritually improved. Grade
auditing comes under this second heading.
Any minister (and this has been true as long as there has been a
subject called religion) is bound to relieve his fellow being of anguish.
There are many ways a minister can do this.
An assist is not engaging in healing. It is certainly not engaging in
treatment. What it is doing is ASSISTING THE INDIVIDUAL TO HEAL HIMSELF OR
BE HEALED BY ANOTHER AGENCY BY REMOVING HIS REASONS FOR PRECIPITATING, AND
PROLONGING HIS CONDITION AND LESSENING HIS PREDISPOSITION TO FURTHER INJURE
HIMSELF OR REMAIN IN AN INTOLERABLE CONDITION.
This is entirely outside the field of "healing" as envisioned by the
medical doctor and by actual records of results is very, very far beyond
the capability of psychology, psychiatry and "mental treatment" as
practiced by them.
In short, the assist is strictly and entirely in the field of the
spirit and is the traditional province of religion.
A minister should realize the power which lies in his hands and his
potential skills when trained. He has this to give in the presence of
suffering: he can make life tolerable. He can also shorten a term of
recovery and may even make recovery possible when it might not be
otherwise.
When a minister confronts someone who has been injured or ill, operated
upon or who has suffered a grave emotional shock, he should be equipped to
do and should do the following:
A CONTACT ASSIST where possible and where indicated until the person
has reestablished his communication with the physical universe site. To
F/N.
A TOUCH ASSIST until the person has reestablished communication with
the physical part or parts affected. To F/N.
HANDLE ANY ARC BREAK that might have existed at the time a) with the
environment, b) with another, c) with others, d) with himself, e) with the
body part or the body, and f) with any failure to recover at once. Each to
F/N.
HANDLE ANY PROBLEM the person may have had a) at the time of illness or
injury, b) subsequently due to his or her condition. Each to F/N.
HANDLE ANY OVERT ACT the person may feel he or she committed a) to self, b)
to the body, c) to another, and d) to others. Each to F/N.
HANDLE ANY WITHHOLD a) the person might have had at the time, b) any
subsequent withhold, and c) any having to withhold the body from work or
others or the environment due to being physically unable to approach it.
RUN THE INCIDENT ITSELF Narrative R3RA Quad to erasure and full EP.
Interest is checked. It is understood here that Flow 1 was the physical
incident itself, not necessarily something done to the person but as
something that happened to him or her.
(Ref: HCOB 26 June 78RA, New Era Dianetics Series 6RA, R3RA REVISED
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS; HCOB 28 June 78RA, New Era Dianetics Series 7RA,
R3RA COMMANDS; HCOB 25 June 78R, New Era Dianetics Series 8R, DIANETICS,
BEGINNING A PC ON.)
HANDLE ANY SECONDARY, which is to say emotional reactions, stresses or
shocks before, during or after the situation. Narrative secondaries are run
R3RA Narrative Quad. Interest is checked. It is important to get the
earliest beginning of the incident and to continue to check for earlier
beginning each run through. (Ref: HCOB 26 June 78RA, New Era Dianetics
Series 6RA, R3RA REVISED ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS; HCOB 28 June 78RA, New
Era Dianetics Series 7RA, R3RA COMMANDS; HCOB 25 June 78R, New Era
Dianetics Series 8R, DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON.)
PREASSESS THE INCIDENT and take to full Dianetic EP all somatics
connected with the incident in which the pc is interested. The full
preassessment procedure is given in HCOB 18 June 78R, New Era Dianetics
Series 4R, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM and the above issues.
POSTULATE TWO-WAY COMM. This is two-way comm on the subject of "any
decision to be hurt" or some such wording. This is done only if the person
has not already discovered that he had decisions connected to the incident.
It is carried to F/N. One must be careful not to invalidate the person.
Where a person is injured, given a Contact or Touch Assist and then
medical examination and treatment, he is given the remainder as soon as he
is able to be audited. The drug "five days" does not need to apply. But
where the person has been given an assist over drugs, one must later come
back to the case when he is off drugs and run the drug part out or at least
make sure that nothing was submerged by the drugs. It is not uncommon for a
person to be oblivious of certain parts of a treatment or operation at the
time of initial auditing, only to have a missing piece of the incident pop
up days, months or even years later. THIS is the reason injuries or
operations occasionally seem to persist despite a full assist: a piece of
it was left unhandled due to a drugged condition during the operation; such
bits may come off unexpectedly in routine auditing on some other apparently
disrelated chain.
(Ref: HCOB 27 June 78RA, New Era Dianetics Series 9R, DRUG HANDLING and
HCOB 19 May 69RA, DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES, PRIOR ASSESSING.)
It can happen that a person is in the midst of some grade auditing at
the time of an injury or illness or receiving an emotional shock. The
question arises as to whether or not to disrupt the grade auditing to
handle the situation. It is a difficult question. But certainly the person
cannot go on with grade auditing while upset or ill. The usual answer is to
give a full assist and repair the ease to bridge it back into the grade
auditing. The question however may be complicated in that some error in the
grade auditing is also sitting there, not to cause the illness or accident
but to complicate the assist. This question is handled fully only by study
of the case by a competent Case Supervisor. The point is not to let the
person go on suffering while time is consumed making a decision.
PRIOR CONFUSION: Fixed ideas follow a period of confusion. This is also
true of engrams that hang up as physical injury. Slow recovery after an
engram has been run can be caused by the prior confusion mechanism. The
engram of accident or injury can be a stable item in a confusion. By 2-way
comm see if a confusion existed prior to the accident, injury or illness.
If so, it may be 2WCed earlier similar to F/N.
MYSTERY POINT: Often there is some part of an incident which is
mysterious to a preclear. The engram itself may hang up on a mystery. A
thetan could be called a
"mystery sandwich" in that he tends to stick in on mysteries. 2WC any
mysterious aspect of the incident. 2WC it earlier similar to F/N cog VGIs.
SUPPRESSIVE PRESENCE: Mistakes or accidents or injuries occur in the
presence of suppression. One wants to know if any such suppressive
influence or factor existed just prior to the incident being handled. This
could be the area it occurred in or persons the preclear had just spoken
to. 2WC any suppressive or invalidative presence that may have caused a
mistake to be made or the accident to occur. 2WC E/S to F/N cog VGIs.
AGREEMENT: Get any agreement the person may have had in or with the
incident. There is usually a point where the person agrees with some part
of the scene. If this point is found it will tend to unpin the pc from
going on agreeing to be sick or injured.
PROTEST: 2WC any protest in the incident.
PREDICTION: The person is usually concerned about his recovery. Undue
worry about it can extend the effects into the future. 2WC (a) how long
he/she expects to take to recover. (b) Get the person to tell you any
predictions others have made about it. 2WC it to an F/N cog VGIs. Note-
avoid getting the person to predict it as a very long time by getting him
to talk about that further.
LOSSES: A person who has just experienced a loss may become ill. This
is particularly true of colds. 2WC anything the pc may have lost to F/N.
PRESENT TIME: An injured or sick person is out of present time. Thus
running HAVINGNESS in every assist session is vital. This not only remedies
havingness but also brings the preclear to present time.
HIGH OR LO TA: A C/S 53 RL should be used to get the TA under control
during assists if it cannot be gotten down. It must be done by an auditor
who knows how to meter and can get reads.
ILLNESS FOLLOWING AUDITING: It can occur that a pc gets ill after being
audited where the "auditing" is out tech. When this occurs or is suspected,
a Green Form should be assessed only by an auditor who can meter and whose
TR 1 gets reads. The GF reads are then handled. Out interiorization, bad
lists, missed W/Hs, ARC breaks and incomplete or flubbed engrams are the
commonest errors.
BEFORE-AFTER: Where an injured or ill pc is so stuck that he has a
fixed picture that does not move, one can jar it loose by asking him to
recall a time before the incident and then asking him to recall a time
after it. This will "jar the engram loose" and change the stuck point.
UNCONSCIOUSNESS: A pc can be audited even if in a coma. The processes
are objective, not significance processes. One process is to use his hand
to reach and withdraw from an object such as a pillow or blanket. One makes
the hand do it while giving the commands. One can even arrange a "signal
system" where the pc is in a coma and cannot talk by holding his hand and
telling him to squeeze one's hand once for yes, twice for no. It is
astonishing that the pc will often respond and he can be questioned this
way.
TEMPERATURE ASSISTS: There is an HCOB, HCOB 23 Jut 71R, ASSISTS, on how
to do assists that bring down the temperature. Holding objects still
repetitively is the basic process.
Quite often an injury or illness will miraculously clear up before one
has run all the steps possible. If this is the case one should end off any
further assist.
All auditing of injured or ill people must be kept fairly light. Errors
in TRs (such as a bad TR 4), errors in tech rebound on them very heavily.
An ill or injured person can easily be audited into a mess if the processes
are too heavy for him to handle and if the auditor is goofing. Very exact
in tech, good TRs, good metering sessions are all that should be tolerated
in assists.
SUMMARY
Religion exists in no small part to handle the upsets and anguish of
life. These include spiritual duress by reason of physical conditions.
Ministers long before the Apostles had as a part of their duties the
ministering to the spiritual anguish of their people. They have
concentrated upon spiritual uplift and betterment. But where physical
suffering impeded this course, they have acted. To devote themselves only
to the alleviation of physical duress is of course to attest that the
physical body is more important than the spiritual beingness of the person
which, of course, it is not. But physical anguish can so distract a being
that he deserts any aspirations of betterment and begins to seek some
cessation of his suffering. The specialty of the medical doctor is the
curing of physical disease or non-optimum physical conditions. In some
instances he can do so. It is no invasion of his province to assist the
patient to greater healing potential. And ills that are solely spiritual in
nature are not medical.
The "psych-iatrist" and "psych-ologist" on the other hand took their
very names from religion since "psyche" means soul. They, by actual
statistics, are not as successful as priests in relieving mental anguish.
But they modernly seek to do so by using drugs or hypnotism or physical
means. They damage more than they help.
The minister has a responsibility to his people and those about him to
relieve suffering. He has many ways to do this. He is quite successful in
doing so and he does not need or use drugs or hypnotism or shock or surgery
or violence. Until his people are at a level where they have no need of
physical things, he has as a duty preventing their spiritual or physical
decay by relieving where he can their suffering.
His primary method of doing so is the ASSIST.
As the knowledge of how to do them exists and as the skill is easily
acquired, he actually has no right to neglect those for whose well-being he
is responsible, as only then can he lead them to higher levels of spiritual
attainment.
An auditor has it in his power to make pcs recover spectacularly. That
power is in direct proportion to his flawlessness as an auditor. Only the
most exact and proper tech will produce the desired result.
If you truly want to help your fellows, that exact skill and those
results are very well worth having.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.lfg.dr
Copyright � 1973, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo
STUDY TECH & POST
(References: HCO PL 4 April 72 Revised
7 Apr 72 ETHICS AND STUDY TECH and HCO PL
4 April Issue III Revised 7 Apr 72 Addition.)
It has just been found that certain staff could not perform their
duties because they knowingly went by misunderstood words in despatches and
telexes.
By this willful failure they had dumped their hats on seniors for two
years.
They were wiped out on post, could not evaluate or find out what was
going on. And spent a bulk of their time sleeping.
THEREFORE:
5. Any person who goes by misunderstood words or abbreviations in
telexes or despatches or materials he handles on post without
clarifying them SHALL BE SUMMONSED TO A COURT OF ETHICS.
The charge is NEGLECT OF DUTY and the minimum sentence is TREASON.
6. Any auditor failing to write clearly on worksheets or put down enough
text to make the worksheet understandable shall be summonsed to a Court
of Ethics.
The charge is NO REPORT.
7. Any Case Supervisor who permits an auditor to write incomprehensibly
or omit data shall be summonsed to a Court of Ethics.
The charge is CONDONING NEGLECT OF DUTY.
ADDITIONAL PENALTY
Whenever this policy letter or its references are found to be out in an
area and not enforced there can be no plea of ignorance and the seniors of
the area are themselves liable to Comm Ev.
Violations of study tech and failures to use this technology are
responsible for great losses and out tech, out admin and overwork of
seniors.
The matter has been regarded too lightly and has caused great losses,
blows and has impeded progress on this planet.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1973RA
Remimeo REVISED 23 APRIL 1975
Tech & Qual REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
All Levels
All Auditors (Revisions in this type style)
All Tech
Checksheets (References to footplates have been deleted.)
DRY AND WET HANDS
MAKE FALSE TA
A couple of years ago some auditors were solving high TA problems by
putting hand cream on the pcs' hands when they were calloused and talcum
powder on a pc's hands when they were too wet. Since no research had been
done they were censured.
Research has now been done on this matter of dry and wet hands.
Apparently when a person has taken certain medicines or chemicals, or
uses detergent soaps or is in contact with certain chemicals (such as those
in some furniture polishes) the ordinary skin oils vanish. These oils are
needed to make an electrical contact with the cans.
When these oils are absent, there is no adequate electrical contact and
the "TA is high."
When a person is deficient in certain minerals or vitamins such as
magnesium or B Complex, his hands can be excessively wet.
Either of these two conditions in hands can produce an incorrect TA
position.
The dry condition produces a false high TA. The overly wet condition
produces a false low TA.
The TA depends on normally moist hands. This does not mean the meter
works on "sweat." It does mean the meter works only when there is a correct
electrical contact.
Too much and too greasy hand cream could produce too low a TA.
Vanishing creams don't work as they are found to actually dry out the
skin after repeated application and so produce a falsely high TA. Too much
powder or drier could produce too high a TA.
Therefore one must not go to extremes.
DRY HANDS
The excessively "dry" hand is seen as shiny or polished looking. It
feels very dry.
The correct treatment is to use a hand cream such as Vaseline Intensive
Care Lotion (obtainable from any cosmetics store) not a greasy hand cream
or vanishing
A good hand cream rubs all the way into the skin and leaves no excess
grease. This restores normal electrical contact.
Such a hand cream would only have to be applied once per session-at
session start-as it lasts for a long while. Hand cream is never applied
during session.
If a cream leaves smears on a can, it is too heavily applied or too little
absorbed.
Hand cream is usually smeared on, rubbed in and can then be thoroughly
wiped off. The hands will usually produce, then, a normal TA and meter
response.
WET HANDS
Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are many brands
of these, often a powder or spray.
It can be wiped off after application and should work for two or three
hours.
If the TA then goes too high, use hand cream on top of it.
SUMMARY
While much work could be done still, the above is enough for a
practical result.
WARNING
Hi TAs and Lo TAs do not widely F/N. If you are getting wide persistent
F/N with the TA too high (above 3) or too low (below 2) you have a pc whose
hands are too dry or too wet. Using this HCOB should correct it and in
future sessions you should continue the remedy on that pc.
NOTHING in this HCOB excuses the misreading or falsifying of a TA. Get
the TA in normal range with this HCOB before you start calling processes
ended.
CS-53RJ and the False TA Checklist HCOB 21 Jan 1977 are your tools for
handling too high and too low TAs.
The only other conditions I know of that make an auditor mess up a pc's
TA are:
(a) A discharged meter (registers high).
(b) An incorrectly set meter by trim button.
(c) A "fleeting F/N" where the pc F/Ns so briefly the auditor
misses it and overruns.
(d) Bad TRs.
(e) Unflat processes.
(f) Overrun processes.
(g) Heavy drugs or medicines.
False TA often comes to light when the auditor runs out of reasons it
is hi or low and it dawns on him that he is dealing with false TA. In the
latter case he should know all MATERIALS ON THIS SUBJECT OF FALSE TA (given
on HCOB 21 Jan 1977 FALSE TA CHECKLIST as references) AND REMEDY THE FALSE
TA SITUATION AND THEN RESUME NORMAL AUDITING. He must not go on calling hi
or low TA F/Ns just by assuming the TA is false.
Given a contact the meter always tells the truth.
LRH:PA:nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1973, 1975. 1977 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Revised by Paulette Ausley
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 MARCH 1974R
REVISED 27 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo CANCELLED 9 MAY 1977
Ex Dn C/Ses CORRECTED 11 MAY 1977
Ex Dn Auditors
Expanded Dianetics Series 21R
EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS
SINCE THE ORIGINAL LECTURES
CANCELLATION
This issue is cancelled as it was originally written by former CS-4 and
some of the data contained in it is incorrect.
All applicable data is now included in BTB 9 May 1977 Issue I, Expanded
Dianetics Series 21RA, EXPANDED DIANETICS ACTIONS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
FMO 1709 I/C
LRH:RS:lf
Copyright � 1974, 1976. 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974RA
REVISED 1 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
Ex Dn C/Ses (Revisions in this type style)
Expanded Dianetics Series 22RA
EXPANDED DIANETICS
REQUISITES
The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be
made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it.
The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for
Ex Dn have been done.
Attach to the inside left cover of the folder.
1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. ________
2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP.
________
3. Pc has been given a thorough CS-1 and is grooved in. ________
4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. No no-interest but
reading items remain unrun. No medicine, drug or stimulant left unrun.
________
5. Pc successful at Dianetic engram running. Can run Dn easily.
________
6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method 1 run very flat to F/N list.
________
7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L-3ExDRB and R3R words.
________
8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53RJ. ________
9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. ________
10. Pc has had any messed up L & N and Why lists corrected. ________
11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to start
Ex Dn. ________
12. Pc is getting Ex Dn after Dn (like Drug RDs, etc) but before grades,
after grades but before Power, after Power but before Solo and after OT
III or after any single grade above OT III. These are the only points
Ex Dn is run on a case. ________
Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly
on Ex Dn.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by CS-5
BDCS:LRH JE nt for the
Copyright � 1974,1976 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 AUGUST 1974RA
RE-REVISED 9 APRIL 1977
Remimeo
Tech Secs (Revisions in this type style)
Auditors
Registrars CANCELS
HCOB 30 OCT 71
TRIPLE GRADES VS EXPANDED
URGENT
C/S Series 93RA
NEW GRADE CHART
The "NEW" thing to do is the Grade Chart. Everything you are doing
should contribute to getting the pc up the Bridge. THIS is the Bridge.
There is a new Grade Chart being prepared which has some changes in it,
based on recent discoveries. It is urgent that you know of these in
advance.
DRUG RUNDOWN
The effects of an omitted or incomplete Drug RD are severe enough to
deny a person any lasting case gain.
This is covered in HCOB 31 May 74 "Unhandled Drugs and Ethics." Some
orgs have taken this HCOB so literally however, that they have taken pcs
off Adv Cses Grades, refused to do assists on ill pcs and some showed pcs
the HCOB and invaled their gains.
This was not the intention of the HCOB. The C/S Series remain valid.
The Drug RD belongs on the Grade Chart after Life Repair. A Drug RD
cannot be done over out ruds and a Life Repair may be necessary to get in a
pc's ruds.
Life Repair is not a prerequisite for the Drug RD, however, and if done
is not to be dragged out intensive after intensive. In some cases a pc
could not complete Life Repair without a Drug RD.
Following the Drug RD is ARC S/W, then the rest of Dianetics to
completion.
QUAD VS EXPANDED GRADES
Expanded Grades are NOT a prerequisite for Power. They may come
anywhere on a pc's program as given in HCOB 5 April 77 "Expanded Grades"
including after OT III. Quad Grades are a prerequisite for Power.
EXPANDED DIANETICS
Ex Dn by the way belongs ideally after Grade IV Expanded, but can be
done after Dn, after Power but before Solo, and after OT III or any single
OT Level above OT III.
Some pcs R/S and have evil purposes to do others in. But no Grade 0 or
Grade I or Grade II. What others? Martians?
"Got to secretly do everybody in" probably applies to Apeville some
long date ago and he's never come up to PT.
The best answer is to bring the pc up the Grade Chart to Grade IV then
do his Ex Dn unless the pc would need XDN to make it at all. (See HCOB 15
Apr 72 "Expanded Dianetics Series 1R" and HCOB 29 Nov 70 "C/S Series 22.")
The prerequisites for Ex Dn are covered on HCOB 23 April 74R "Ex Dn
Series 22R, Expanded Dianetics Requisites."
GRADE II
Some orgs specialize in Grade II, especially on org staff. The pc is
always getting Confessionals or his O/Ws pulled on so and so.
If you look on the Grade Chart you will find withholds and overts are
Grade TWO.
Below Grade Two lies Grade I (Problems) and Grade Zero
(Communications). And below that is Dianetics and at the bottom end of
Dianetics is the drug handling.
Now how do you expect a fellow who has unhandled drugs (or omitted drug
items because of "no interest") to even know (no Grade 0) that other people
are around or that (Grade I) he is caved in with problems he's never
cognited on?
And he's supposed to have enough responsibility to answer up on Grade
II? With real overts and withholds?
This does not mean you must never Sec Check. It does mean that Sec
Checks are no substitute for auditing or guarantee of innocence.
Grades are grades and the Grade Chart sequence is correct.
SOLO SET-UPS
Set-ups for Solo are fully covered on HCOB 8 Jan 72RC, Solo C/S Series
11RC.
This will be included as part of Solo on the Grade Chart as it is a
vital step.
Pcs won't make it on Solo if they aren't set up.
FULL LIST
Here's the full list of grades showing where the various RDs now
offered fit.
GROUP PROCESSING-not mandatory or a prerequisite.
LIFE REPAIR-as needed but not prerequisite for Drug RD. To get ruds in on
life.
DRUG RD, means:
TRs 0-4, 6-9-mandatory for a druggie currently on drugs, FLAT.
Full C/S-1-where not done. To fully educate pc.
Objectives-Full battery to full EPs per basic books and early HCOBs on
them.
Class VIII Drug Handling-list and rehab all drugs, 3 way recalls,
secondaries and engrams of taking and giving drugs.
AESPs on each reading drug-listed separately and handled with R3R, each
drug to full F/N assessment of drug list.
"No Interest" drug items-all reading ones run where they exist.
Prior Assessment-AESPs listed separately and run R3R, prior to first
drug or alcohol taken.
ARC S/W QUAD.
DIANETICS, means:
C/S 54-complete handling of Pc Assessment Form begun with Drug RD.
Health Form-fully handled to full F/N assessment.
QUAD GRADE 0-as issued.
QUAD GRADE I-as issued.
QUAD GRADE II-as issued.
QUAD GRADE III-as issued.
QUAD GRADE IV-as issued.
EX DN-not mandatory except where pc is a low OCA, an R/Ser (2%),
chronically ill or psycho. Means:
Set-ups-per HCOB 23 April 74R, "Ex Dn Series 22R."
OCA Left Side Handling-as issued.
OCA Right Side Handling-as issued.
All Ev Purps and R/Ses FULLY handled with no shortcuts.
EXPANDED GRADES-Ideally can go after Ex Dn and before Power, but is not a
prerequisite for Power (Quad Grades are a prerequisite). Can come after
Drug RD, Full Dn RD, Quad Grades, Ex Dn, Power (but before Solo), after
OT III or any single OT level on up.
POWER PROCESSING-Grade IV Quad and Drug RD required and as per the Power
Checklist.
SOLO GRADE VI, means:
Solo Set-ups-done at SH or AO per Solo C/S Series 11RC.
Solo Auditor's Course.
Solo Audit Grade VI materials.
CLEARING COURSE
OT I
OT II
OT III
OT VII PROCESSES
OT III EXPANDED
OT IV
OT V
OT VI
FULL OT VII VERIFICATION
OT VIII-when issued.
OT IX on up.
PROGRAMMING
The C/S Series, especially the early HCOBs, numbers 1-13RA, fully cover
the use of the Grade Chart in programming.
THE GRADE CHART IS THE BASIC PROGRAMME OF A PC.
This datum has been neglected in some orgs, who have specialized in the
new RDs developed since '71.
With refinement of repair and corrective actions and the release of new
RDs, some may have forgotten that repair is only done to get off the
overwhelm so that you can put the pc back on the Grade Chart.
SUMMARY
I thought I'd better fill you in on these changes and how the new Grade
Chart lines up. Make full use of this Chart with C/S Series programming
tech in and your pcs will fly. Here's to lots of case gain and rave success
stories.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
CS-5
BDCS:LRH:JE:nt.lf for the
Copyright @ 1974, 1976, 1977 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1974RA
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
XDn Spclsts (Revised to correct the definition of a rock slam.
Cl IVs & Above Revisions in this type style.
C/Ss Ellipsis indicates deletion.)
HCO Dept 3 Hats
PTS/SP Detection Crs
ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS
Reference: HCOB 3 September 1978
DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
A lot of controversy has shown up this year on the subject of R/Ses and
R/Sers. Therefore, the following bulletin was compiled from my materials to
clarify the matter. My research on this was actually done years ago and
remains very valid indeed.
R/Ses
An R/S or rock slam is defined as the crazy, irregular left-right
slashing motion of the needle on the E-Meter dial. R/Ses repeat left and
right slashes unevenly and savagely, faster than the eye easily follows.
The needle is frantic. The width of an R/S depends largely on sensitivity
setting. It goes from one-fourth inch to whole dial. But it slams back and
forth. It is actually quite startling to see one. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM
OTHER METER PHENOMENA.
Recently auditors arriving on Flag were found not to know what an R/S
was but were calling dirty needles, dirty reads, rocket reads, body motion
and even ticks as R/Ses. That comes from never having been trained on what
an R/S is and never having seen one. R/SES ARE UNIQUE IN APPEARANCE. On the
other hand, far more serious is the fact that auditors have many times seen
R/Ses, didn't mark them down and didn't report them! This is a High Crime
as it injures society, the org and the person himself (see HCOB 10 Aug 76R
"R/Ses, What They Mean").
Actually this is quite a serious matter because pcs get labelled as
R/Sers and get run on evil purposes connected with this "R/S" that isn't
one. You can really foul up a pc that way.
A meter also sometimes "goes crazy" on an R/Ser. You see it work, then
it doesn't read, etc. While this is rare it does happen. Auditors have
changed their meters just to find the new one was also crazy. But the R/S
will show up through all this. An inoperational meter does not mean you
have an R/Ser-you might have just forgotten to charge it or have faulty
leads.
ROCK SLAMMERS
In a normal group of 400, the actual percentage of R/Sers is low. It's
about 8 in 400, or 2 - 2 1/2%. Those figures should seem familiar. They are
the same percentage for SPs. And that gives you a clue to the
identification of an R/Ser.
Where requirements for Scn or SO orgs have been established for R/Ses
they apply to the 2 - 2 1/2% of real R/Sers as these are high risks for
staff purposes.
These people can of course be salvaged as pcs using Expanded Dianetics.
Letting them on staff could be disastrous, however.
A handled R/Ser can be expected to eventually wind up in the same
category as a cleared cannibal. His experiential track is too educated in
evil and too uneducated in anything else. So even when cleaned up will need
a lot of living.
R/Sers are also very expensive people to keep around. They waste the
available resources and produce overt products. They cost a fortune in
waste, repairs, lost business. They also cost a heartbreaking number of
damaged people.
CHECKLIST
To assist you in the identification of R/Sers a checklist of
characteristics and their reference has been done.
This checklist is to be used whenever a C/S is called upon to inspect a
folder to determine whether a person is an R/Ser. That he R/Ses is the main
thing. The other points simply help investigate whether he R/Ses. He
doesn't have to have all these characteristics to be an R/Ser.
1. The R/Ses reported are actual R/Ses and not some other read or broken
meter leads, a dusty or worn TA or trim "pot," or cans in contact with
metal such as rings, bracelets, etc. ________
Ref: E-Meter Essentials; Book of E-Meter Drills; The Book Introducing
the E-Meter; HCOB 8 Nov 62 "Somatics, How to Tell Terminals and
Opposition Terminals" pg 2 and 4; HCOB 6 Dec 62 "R2-10, R2-12, 3GAXX";
BTB 14 Jan 63 "Rings Causing Rock Slams"; HCOB "False TA Series" 24 Oct
71R, 12 Nov 71RA, 15 Feb 72R, 18 Feb 72R, 21 Jan 77R, 23 Nov 73RA .
2. R/Ses have to do with evil thoughts, overts or intentions.
________
3. Pc is slow or no case gain. ________
3A. Pc is in a chronically nattery or critical state. ________
Ref: HCOB 23 Nov 62 "Routine Two-Twelve"; . . . HCOB 6 Dec 62 "R2-10,
R2-12, 3GAXX"; HCOB 28 Nov 70 C/S Series 22 "Psychosis"; BPL 31 May
71RG "PTS/SP Detection, Routing 8. Handling Checksheet" and materials.
________
4. Pc chronically ill or who acts most "PTS." This can be suppressed and
hidden from view, however. ________
Ref: HCO PL 15 Nov 70R "HCO and Confessionals"; HCOB 28 Nov 70 C/S
Series 22 "Psychosis"; PTS/SP Pack.
4A. He covers up his crimes with lots of PR. ________
5. Pc's product is consistently an overt act and his activities
destructive to others whether they have spotted this or not.
________
Ref: HCO PL 14 Nov 70 Org Series 14 "The Product as an Overt Act";
PTS/SP Pack; HCO Manual of Justice.
6. Pc's behavior or condition or OCA classifies as psychotic.
________
Ref: HCOB Ex Dn Series and tapes; HCOB 28 Nov 70.
7. The people near him get in trouble. ________
Where some of the answers to this checklist are yes you can be certain
an R/S will be found in auditing. HCO handles and Qual programs them for
rehabilitation.
LIST ONE R/Ser
There are, for our purposes, two kinds of R/Sers. (a) Those who R/S on
subjects not connected with Scn and (b) Those who R/S on subjects connected
to Scientology. The latter is a "List One R/Ser" and it is of great
importance to us that they be located and moved off lines when they are
part of staffs as their intent is solely to destroy us whatever else they
say: their long run actions will prove it.
The definition of a List One R/Ser is anyone who has R/Sed on List One.
If that is confirmed fully, that's it. Not all points on the checklist have
to be present. The full list of Scientology List One items can be found in
HCOB 24 Nov AD 12 "Routine 2-12 List One - Issue One, the Scientology
List."
Where there is any doubt as to the validity of a List One R/S, a
verification should be done. The procedure is to vigorously Sec Check the
pc on the subject of the reported List One R/S. This Sec Check must be done
by an auditor who knows R/Ses and can make lists read and pull W/Hs
connected with R/S.
PCs WHO R/S
Pcs who R/S are given Ex Dn. This does not change even though the pc is
not an R/Ser. See HCOB C/S Series 93 and HCOB 10 Aug 76R "R/Ses, What They
Mean."
Where a pc R/Ses he will have evil purposes and be on a succumb as a
result. R/Ses indicate an area of psychosis which will ruin the pc's life
if allowed to go unhandled.
SUMMARY
This HCOB in no way changes Ex Dn as a requirement for R/Ses or makes
it OK not to handle them.
Staff concerned must be able to identify an R/Ser which is different
from someone with an R/S.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by CS-4/5
Revision by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1974, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JANUARY 1975R
REVISED 6 JULY 1978
Remimeo
C/Ses (Revisions in this type style)
IV and VI (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
C/Ses
Class VIII
C/S PAST LIFE REMEDIES
Dn C/S Course
(Note: This Bulletin has been revised to align with the
New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins Series 1-18.)
There are many remedies and considerable tech developed over the years
on the subject of pcs unable to go earlier than this life. There was no
full coverage bulletin which gave the full story on this.
The earliest was getting the pc to locate and run imaginary incidents.
This is fully covered in Science of Survival, especially Book Two, Chapter
Nine, "Imaginary Incidents." The auditor clears the idea of imaginary
incidents and running them, then persuades the pc to run them without
forcing him.
Delusion tends to run off but the real incidents move into view as
well. These imaginary incidents can be run R3RA Narrative Quad.... Full
preassessment procedure (per New Era Dianetics Series tech) of the
somatics, emotions, etc., of the imaginary incident, can be incorporated in
the Past Life Remedy as part of the action of grooving in the pc. (See:
HCOB 18 June 78, New Era Dianetics Series 4, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE
ITEM, and HCOB 28 June 78, New Era Dianetics Series 7, R3RA COMMANDS, for
Narrative and R3RA Quad commands.)
Another Past Life Remedy would be for the auditor to assess the
following list on the pc:
earlier existences abandoned pictures
previous existences past life experiences
past lives memory
earlier lives amnesia
unreal pictures forgetting
other times leaving bodies
past deaths past bodies
going backtrack new bodies
imaginary incidents lost possessions
invalidated pictures forgotten pictures
other identities death
imaginary beingnesses losing a body
pretended injuries forgotten memories
pretended illnesses invalidated memories
disgusting pictures painful pictures
painful memories ignored pictures
enforced pictures fading pictures
fearful incidents fearful pictures
sad pictures forgotten times
invalidated track pretended incidents
only one lifetime unbelievable pictures
unknown incidents forgotten families
lost friends between body experiences
degraded experiences unreal experiences
deja vu forgotten beingness
forgotten lives abandoned deaths
not-ised existence not-ised existences
invalidated pictures invalidated memories
invalidated imagination not-ised imagination
invalidated perception abandoned perceptions
things you don't want to find out about
Any item can be added to the above by the pc.
You then take the largest reading item found in the above and ask the
pc to describe it briefly. Ask him "In your own words briefly describe
(item that read)."
Use the exact wording the pa gave you. Treat that wording as an
original item exactly as though it had been obtained on the Original
Assessment List, New Era Dianetics Series 5.
Handle the items the pa gives you exactly as you would handle any
original item or items in New Era Dianetics Series 4 (preassessment, etc.)
Exhaust all reading items in the above prepared list.
Reassess the prepared list and do each of the above steps.
When the pa is able to go earlier than this life with good reality then
the remedy is complete.
Often the pc won't go backtrack because he's a druggie.
What has happened here is that he restimulated past lives with drugs,
got into frightening pictures that he didn't understand and now backs off
from ANY bank content except drugs. That is handled with a full Drug RD,
including a full battery of Objectives and all reading items run including
"no interest" items. The standard approach on any pc is to get full drug
handling done first. See: HCOB 27 June 78, New Era Dianetics Series 9, DRUG
HANDLING.
Another reason could be the pc is in recent shock of having died. Such
a case is overburdened and is destimulated with general auditing and then
gets a Past Life Remedy if he hasn't gone backtrack. You could even do a
Prior Assessment to this life.
The subject of invalidation of past lives and people talking about them
out of session or claiming to be famous people invalidates past lives for a
pc and is actually related to suppression and PTS phenomena. If you suspect
this you could ask "Has anyone been talking to you about past lives or
famous people?" From this question possible suppression in the environment
can be located and used in a PTS RD, HCOB 9 Dec 71R, Revised 21 Oct 74.
CHILDREN
Children are usually very burdened cases and can be hard to C/S on
Dianetics if it hits this life only which will leave the pc wide open to
key-in and at the age of 20 be found all keyed-in "with all grades run."
I find they are jammed into fiction stories, education, books and
movies and run these like engrams. These children speak of "remembering"
all the time. They say they can't go backtrack "because they don't
remember." They don't seem to take it from pictures. Contrary to psychology
theories and popular belief I find children in very rough case shape,
nervous, frightened, griefy, etc. They get stuck in the books and movies
they see.
I have handled this in various ways. The easiest way to unburden cases
is by Objectives (contact processes) and Recall (ARC S/W, Self Analysis).
That is the general approach. You can list for mental image pictures pc has
seen in life, in movies or books, take the best reading one and do full
preassessment procedure on it, handling the running item obtained with R3RA
Quad. Then repeat the preassessment steps until you get no reads on the
Preassessment List you have assessed for that original item.
Return to the mental image pictures list, take the next largest
reading item and do full preassessment, etc. Follow HCOB 18 June 1978,
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM (New Era Dianetics Series 4) exact/y.
Preassessment can also be done on unwanted attitudes, emotions, pains,
etc. (the Preassessment List) one had as a child. These would then be fully
handled as above to unburden the case.
A direct approach is to ask "What book or movie were you particularly
interested in?" You'll usually find that the person had a stuck picture on
it. Then ask "Did you ever have anything to do with that sort of thing?"
Then they go into it because you're asking for an E/S. You could then run
out the earlier incident Narrative R3RA Quad and you'd be away.
Where the pc is stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books you
can list for "Bad incidents you've seen or read about," take the best
reading one with pc interest and run it out R3RA Narrative Quad. Then
handle with preassessment procedure, per above. Be sure to accept stories,
TV, movies or books as these are fully valid to run.
REVIEW
A Scientology review action that can be done is to assess auditors,
auditing, past lives, Dianetics, Scientology, time, preclears and erasure.
Then prepcheck in order of reads, reassess and prepcheck. This is a
valuable action to do before ARC S/W Triple and often by itself will handle
those unable to go past track.
A further Scientology approach would be to assess the past, memory
pictures, past lives and prepcheck in order of reads. Then L&N "Who or what
would have no future?" then L&N "Who or what would it have been awful to
have been?" These items can be checked and used in a PTS RD or can have
their intentions listed and run as part of Ex Dn handling.
SUMMARY
The technology on past lives is important for a C/S to know, especially
the Dianetics C/S.
The subject usually resolves with a Drug RD and general auditing but
when it doesn't you have these remedies to use.
Use them well.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rs.rd.lfg
Copyright � 1975, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1975R
REVISED 26 JANUARY 1977
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
Tech & Qual
All Levels
All Auditors
All Tech
Checksheets
VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA ADDITION
HCOB 15 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
HCOB 18 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 3
HCOB 21 Jan 77 FALSE TA CHECKLIST
HCOB 23 Nov 73RA DRY AND WET HANDS
MAKE FALSE TA
After further and more extensive tests vanishing creams have proven
unsuitable as a solution to dry hands.
In some cases vanishing creams have actually dried out pcs' hands and
caused a false high TA.
Vaseline Intensive Care Lotion has proven very workable when applied to
a pc's hands, rubbed in and any excess wiped off.
Another cream called Locorten was also found workable but it contains
cortisone which burns the eyes if you rub them with your hands. Further
tests are underway on Locorten without cortisone but these are not yet
complete.
Another hand cream formula was found 90% effective upon test and is
somewhat similar to the Locorten formula without cortisone. Its formula is:
75 grams Emulsified Cetomacrofolis Wax
(80% cetostearyl alcohol and 20% cetomacrofol 1000)
100 grams Cetyl Alcohol
20 grams Sorbitol Solution - 70%
1 gram Sorbic Acid
up to
500 grams water.
You could have this cream made up by any pharmacist.
A NOTE ON FOOTPLATES
Footplates obscure F/Ns and reads.
Their use is hereby cancelled.
FALSE TA HANDLING
It has never been OK to call a pc's attention to his hands or TA or
meter during a session. Therefore when handling a false TA get the TA in
range with hand cream or can size or grip before session.
Don't check for hand cream or can grip or change cans during the session
except as directed on correction lists such as a C/S Series 53RJ under
false TA.
Otherwise it throws the pc out of session and puts his attention on his
TA.
Use the session for auditing.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
Paulette Ausley
LRH:PA:nt
Copyright � 1975, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
SPECIAL RUNDOWN LECTURES
Daytona, Florida
29 October-8 December 1975
L. Ron Hubbard personally briefed and trained a specially picked team
of auditors on a new Flag rundown. Following is a list of the tapes that
were made of those briefings. This new rundown later became known as "The
New Vitality Rundown."
**7510C29SO First Lecture - Special Rundown
**7510C30SO Second Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7510C31 SO Third Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C01 SO Fourth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C02SO Fifth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C03SO Sixth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C04SO Seventh Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C05SO Eighth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C06SO Ninth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C07SO Tenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C08SO Eleventh Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C10SO Twelfth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C11SO Thirteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C12SO Fourteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C13SO Fifteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C14SO Sixteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C17SO Seventeenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C18SO Eighteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C19SO Nineteenth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C20SO Twentieth Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C21 SO Twenty-first Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7511C24SO Twenty-second Lecture-Special Rundown Pilot
**7512C08SO Ron's Talk
THE TECHNICAL BULLETINS OF DIANETICS
AND SCIENTOLOGY
by L. Ron Hubbard
Published August 1976
The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology represent the
complete reference work of Dianetics and Scientology technical bulletins.
The first eight volumes of this big ten volume set contain all of Ron's
technical bulletins from 1950 to 1976. This is the complete time track of
Ron's written technical materials.
The ninth volume contains all of the technical series issues, such as
the Basic Auditing Series, Expanded Dianetics Series, Cramming Series, and
many more.
The tenth volume contains the famous C/S Series plus a 250-page master
subject index. You can find all of the references for any subject listed in
this index. Over 20,000 entries!
Four-way indexing makes any technical reference easy to find. Each
volume has the bulletins listed by date, by date with a summary of
contents, alphabetically by title, and a subject index in each volume.
Ten hardbound volumes, all the size of the Organization Executive
Course Volumes (7 3/4" by 12"), 5,600 pages total, each volume over 500
pages thick and individually indexed plus a cumulative index for the set.
Available from your nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct
from the publishers: Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S.,
4833 Fountain Ave., East Annex, Los Angeles, California 90029, U.S.A.; or
Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V,
Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1976R
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Only revision is the correction of the definition of a
rock slam. Revisions in this type style.)
Remimeo
All Sec
Checkers
All HCO Ref: HCOB 3 Sep 78,
All Meter DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
Operators
R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN
(HANDLING OF CONFESSIONALS CHECKSHEETS)
(PTS PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS)
(EXPANDED DIANETICS CHECKSHEETS)
(METER OPERATION CHECKSHEETS)
(VARIOUS RUNDOWN CHECKSHEETS)
The crazy, irregular, left-right slashing motion of the needle in the E-
Meter dial is called "A rock slam" or "R/S." It repeats left and right
slashes unevenly and savagely, faster than the eye easily follows. The
needle is frantic. The width of an R/S depends largely on sensitivity
setting. It goes from one-fourth inch to whole dial. But it slams back and
forth.
The term was taken from a process in the 50s which sought to locate "A
rock" on the pc's early time track; the "slam" is a description of the
needle violence, meaning it "slams" back and forth. For a time all left-
right motions of the needle were considered and called "rock slams" until
it was found that a smooth left-right flow was a symptom of release or key-
out and this became the "floating needle." There is yet another left-right
motion of the needle called the "theta bop." This occurs when the person
has or is trying to exteriorize. "Theta" is the symbol for the person as a
spirit or goodness; "bop" is an electronic term for a slight hitch in the
sweep of a needle. A "theta bop" hitches evenly at each end of the sweep
left and right and is very even in the middle of the sweep.
Neither the "floating needle" nor the "theta bop" can be confused with
a "rock slam." The difference of the rock slam is uneven, frantic slashing
left and right; even the distances traveled left and right are likely to be
different in each swing from the last.
A "rock slam" can be caused sometimes by leaving rings on the pc's
fingers or by a short circuit in the meter or by the cans (electrodes)
touching something like a dress. These are the mechanical considerations
and must be ruled out before the pc can be considered to have "rock
slammed." If the pc is not wearing rings and if the meter needle is calm
with the lead unplugged, if the lead is okay, and if the pc is not jiggling
the ends of the cans against his clothes, then the pc's rock slam is caused
by the pc's bank .
One has to be very careful about the correctness of the pc actually
having rock slammed while on the meter, that it was actually observed, that
it was not mechanically caused as above. One puts the R/S down on the
worksheet and also gives exactly what was asked. And also that the
mechanical points were checked without distracting the pc.
ONE MUST ALWAYS REPORT A ROCK SLAM IN THE AUDITING REPORT, NOTE IT WITH
SESSION DATE AND PAGE INSIDE THE LEFT COVER OF THE PC'S FOLDER AND REPORT
IT TO ETHICS INCLUDING THE QUESTION OR SUBJECT WHICH ROCK SLAMMED, PHRASED
EXACTLY.
Why? Because the rock slam is the most important needle manifestation! It
gives the clue to the pc's case.
In 1970 I began a full-scale research project into the subject of
insanity and its relationship to cases and case gains and suppression. It
was only then that the full significance of the rock slam was unearthed.
This research developed into what is now called EXPANDED DIANETICS, a
series of special processes and actions with their drills and training
which permits the auditor to handle a specific case type. This was, by the
way, Man's first system of positive detection and handling of psychosis and
the first full understanding of what psychosis is.
While this bulletin is not in any way a two-minute course in or a
substitute for full training in Expanded Dianetics, any auditor who audits,
Sec Checks, or handles people on a meter has to know what a rock slam is
and how it behaves and what he should do about it.
The first thing is to be able to recognize one and to quickly with the
scan of the eye and unplug of the meter cord (without any distraction of or
notice by the pc) make the checks for a mechanical rock slam as given
above.
You can make a meter "rock slam" with no pc or cord connected to it by
(a) turning it on; (b) put the sensitivity at perhaps 2; � put the needle
at "set"; (d) rapidly, very rapidly, move the TA back and forth maybe a
quarter of an inch and do it unevenly. That, if you did it very fast and
unevenly, would be something that resembled a rock slam. But no matter how
fast you made your fingers move, a real R/S is a trifle faster. If you do
that you will see what an R/S looks like. The needle in this experiment is
not made to hit the sides of the meter.
Now if you take the same set-up and smoothly slowly move the tone arm
back and forth about 2 times a second without any roughness and the same
distance right and left, you will have a floating needle. Note it very well
as this comes at a time of release and is the thing a good auditor hopes to
see and gives him the end-off signal for a process. It has to be well known
as you NEVER bypass one in a session and to do so makes an uncomfortable
pc. (The pc will often cognite-get a realization about himself or life at
this point and one does not stop him from doing this.) This is the thing
you indicate to the pc. You don't ever indicate rock slams or theta bops.
When you see it, and without stopping or interrupting the pc's cognition,
you always say, "Your needle is floating."
Now the theta bop can also be shown to yourself by you. Set up the
meter as above. Only this time, you smoothly swing it to the right and give
it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then you smoothly, at once, swing
it to the left and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then do it
to the right. And so on. This is a theta bop. It is different than a
floating needle only in that it hitches at each end of the swing. So learn
to recognize it.
There is a vicious smooth right direction slash that occurs when a pc
hits a certain area of the bank that is called a "rocket read" and there is
of course the small fall, long fall (which both go to the right and
indicate a charged question or reaction) and there is the gradual rise to
the left. But these do not repeat back and forth which is the
characteristic of the rock slam, floating needle and theta bop.
All right, so we know exactly what it looks like when we talk about a
ROCK SLAM as a read of the meter. We know how it can be mechanically
caused. And we know what we have to record and report when it is seen.
But exactly what does a rock slam mean with regards to the pc?
If you don't know this you can miss on the pc, on the case, on the org
and humanity.
A ROCK SLAM MEANS A HIDDEN EVIL INTENTION ON THE SUBJECT OR QUESTION UNDER
DISCUSSION OR AUDITING.
Two things underlie insanity, or to be more specific, there are two
causes and conditions both of which have been lumped together by man and
called insanity. He could not of course define it as he didn't know what
caused it.
The first of these two things does not concern us overly much here and
is the subject of a separate checksheet and training and is called PTS or
Potential Trouble Source handling. A "PTS" is a person who has been or is
connected with somebody who has evil intentions. A PTS can feel
uncomfortable in life or be neurotic or go insane because of the actions
upon him of a person with evil intentions. Most of the people in
institutions are probable PTSes.
The second of these two things is insanity caused to the individual
himself (let alone others) by hidden evil intentions.
The extent of these intentions and what the person will do (and hide)
in order to carry them out is quite shocking. These people are covert or
overt criminals and many of them are insane-meaning beyond all rationality
in their acts. Because their evil intentions are hidden and because they
are often very plausible such individuals are what make "behavior so
mysterious" and "Man look so evil when you see what Mankind does" and all
sorts of fallacies.
It is this last type, the chronic, heavy rock slammer, which Expanded
Dianetics handles.
One rock slam doesn't make a psychotic. Or a total menace to everyone.
But it does mean there could be more and it might in rare cases mean you
have, seeing enough of these R/Ses, a very dangerous person on your hands
and in your vicinity. And that person must be handled by Expanded
Dianetics.
You won't see a great many rock slams in auditing people so you could
be totally thrown off by surprise when you see one. And mess it all up
because you are surprised. So know what it is and don't get all quivery and
make mistakes and blow your confront. Just carry on.
If you don't note the EXACT question that was asked and the EXACTLY
worded statement the pc made when the R/S was seen, you can muck it up for
the Expanded Dianetics guys. They won't be able to get it turned back on
again easily and will lose a lot of time. So you have to be sure your
auditing report is accurate, that the R/S is written BIG on the column and
circled and, no matter what else you do in the session, you have to get it
recorded in the left front cover of the folder giving the date and page of
the session and you have to report it to Ethics. And also you don't third
party the pc and give him a bad time in the session because of it.
Now R/Ses most easily turn on during Sec Checks or Integrity Processing
or when pulling withholds or trying to investigate something. So the people
who see these most often are those engaged in that activity and not routine
auditing (when they can also but more rarely turn on). Further the most
likely person to collide with "needing to be Sec Checked" is an R/Ser,
which again increases the numbers of R/Ses seen in these activities
compared to routine auditing. But a very heavy R/Ser will also turn them on
in routine auditing.
It is the exact point of the R/S in the session, the exact question
that was asked and the exact subject or phrase where the R/S turned on that
are important. And these are very important as then the person can be fully
handled with a full Expanded Dianetics Rundown by a qualified Expanded
Dianetics Specialist. When, of course, the person gets to that point on his
Grade Chart. The Grade Chart points are after Dianetics (like Drug RDs,
etc.) but before grades, after grades but before Power, after Power but
before Solo, and after OT III or after any single grade above OT III. These
are the only
points where Expanded Dianetics can be delivered and the R/S fully and
completely handled.
Now here is how you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is
handled:
1. The overt-motivator sequence has two sides. One is what the person
has done (overt) and what is done to the person (motivator). You can
ask, when the person R/Ses on something, if anyone has ever INVALIDATED
him on that subject or action. He will find some and the R/S will turn
off AND WON'T EVEN BE FAINTLY HANDLED BUT ONLY SUBMERGED. One can
believe he has "handled" the R/S. Not true. He has just turned it off
and maybe made it harder to find next time. One can ask what the person
has done TO the subject mentioned and while this may unburden the case
and make the person a bit better, the R/S is NOT handled, only turned
off or submerged. It's almost as if there are so many overts and
motivators on this subject or in this area that the push-pull of it
makes the needle go wild (R/S). And indeed, this may be the energy
cause, in the bank, of the needle reaction. But neither overt nor
motivator handles an R/S finally because the CAUSE of the R/S is an
INTENTION to harm and it isn't all that likely the basic intention will
be reached.
2. Another apparent way the R/S can get "handled" and isn't is to take
the R/Ser earlier similar on the subject of the R/S. The R/S will
probably cease, go "clean." But in actual fact it is still there,
hidden.
3. The third way an R/S can be falsely "handled" is to direct the
person's attention to something else. If, when this is done, the exact
subject of the R/S is not noted by the auditor, it will be difficult to
find it again when the person goes into Expanded Dianetic auditing.
4. Yet another, and probably the last way to falsely "handle" an R/S is
to abuse the person about his conduct or behavior or the R/S, or to
"educate" him to do better, or to "modify" his behavior with shocks or
surgery or other tortures like the psychiatrists do. In other words one
can seek to suppress the R/S in numerous ways. Maybe the R/S won't
occur (being too overburdened now) but it is still there, buried very
deep and possibly beyond reach now.
So if you understand the above four points you will see that although
you can ease off the R/S, you have not handled it. It has merely gone out
of sight.
All right, what then DOES HANDLE an R/S?
I warned you that this isn't a two-minute course on Expanded Dianetics
and it isn't. An R/S is HANDLED by a fully qualified Expanded Dianetics
auditor delivering full Expanded Dianetics to the person at that point on
the Grade Chart where Expanded Dianetics is supposed to be delivered. If
anyone thinks it can be done effectively any other way or if he C/Ses it to
be done and the auditor is stupid enough to try to do that C/S, then it's
Committees of Evidence and suspended certificates all around.
With that warning, and only with that warning, I can briefly state what
has to be done with the case. This is not what YOU do if you are not
delivering full Expanded Dianetics at the right point on the Grade Chart.
It is a brief statement so that you can understand what lies under that
R/S.
The pc with an R/S on any given subject and who R/Ses while discussing
that or related subjects HAS AN EVIL INTENTION TOWARD THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED
OR SOME CLOSELY RELATED SUBJECT. The pc intends that subject or area of
life nothing but calculating, covert, underhanded HARM which will be at all
times carefully hidden from that subject.
Thus, the Expanded Dianetics Specialist, in handling that case (at the
proper point on the Grade Chart) has to be able to locate each and every
subject and question and R/S in that person's folder as noted by Sec
Checkers and previous auditors or
Cramming Officers or Why Finders. He has to have the complete list of R/S
subjects. If they are noted as to session date and page and if all Sec
Checking papers and cramming papers are in that person's folder, then the
Expanded Dianetics Specialist can do a full and complete job. Otherwise he
has to do a lot of other time wasting actions to get the R/Ses found and
turned on again.
What the Expanded Dianetics Specialist actually does is locate EXACTLY
the actual evil intention for every R/S on the case and handle each one to
total conclusion. When he is finished, if he has done his job well, the
person's behavior will be magically improved and as to his social presence,
menace and conduct, well that will be toward survival.
When you see an R/S, if you are not an Expanded Dianetic Specialist
doing Expanded Dianetics at the correct point on the Grade Chart, you don't
say "Hey, you've got an evil intention!" and you don't ask "Say, what's
that evil intention?" or do corny things like that because you'll get the
pc self-listing, you may get a wrong item, you won't know what to do with
it and you're just likely to get the auditing room wrapped around your neck
right there.
No, you quietly note it, make sure it isn't a mechanical fault, write
it big on the worksheet, write down everything the pc is saying swiftly,
note what question you were asking and let the pc talk and ack him and go
on with what you are doing with the pc at the time. And after session you
note it in the left-hand cover of the folder and send a report to Ethics.
And some day, when he's done his Drug Rundown or gotten to one of the
points on the Grade Chart where a full XDn can be done, why then it will be
handled. And a good C/S will program or tip the case for that to be done.
So that's the know-how you have to know about R/Ses to really help the
guy and the society and your group.
We're not in the business of curing psychos. The governments at this
writing pay the psychiatrists billions a year to torture and kill because
of R/Ses they don't know anything about. The crime in the society out there
is caused by people who R/S. Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon and Caesar were
probably the most loaded R/Sers of all time unless it was Jack the Ripper
or your local friendly psychiatrist.
So know what you are seeing when you see it and know what to do about
it. And don't kid yourself. Or vilify or mow down people who R/S; we're not
in that business.
And the Expanded Dianetic Specialist and the pc someday will love you
dearly for knowing your job and doing it right.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.dr
Copyright � 1976, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE VOLUNTEER
MINISTER'S HANDBOOK
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published October 1976
In The Volunteer Minister's Handbook, L. Ron Hubbard has made available
many of his discoveries in the fields of communication and social
interaction, which can be used by anyone to help themselves and others.
How do you deal with an emotional upset? How do you salvage a broken
marriage? What can you do when there is an emergency or a sudden accident?
How do you handle a drug problem or alcoholism? What could you do to help a
runaway teenager? A failing businessman? What is the right way-the
effective way-to handle these situations and thousands of situations like
them?
As a Volunteer Minister, you'll know the answers.
Simply being critical of people or situations accomplishes nothing.
When a person finds fault with something, it implies that he wants to do
something about it, and would if he could.
By studying this book, you can gain the knowledge you need to really
help others lead happier lives. And you'll be helping yourself too.
676 pages, 66 brilliant full-color photographs mostly taken by L. Ron
Hubbard, index, glossary, hard cover with dust jacket. Available from your
nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct from the publishers:
Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 4833 Fountain Ave.,
East Annex, Los Angeles, California 90029, U.S.A.; or Scientology
Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V, Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1976
(Also issued as HCO PL 20.10.76 same title.)
Remimeo
DPE
Ethics Officers
PTS/SP Checksheet
PTS DATA
Based on a recent pilot it has become quite obvious that a full and
complete PTS handling would consist of:
A. PTSness handled terminatedly by interview or auditing by a
person trained on BPL 31 May 71RC.
B. Complete study and pass on the PTS/SP Checksheet, BPL 3l May
71RC Revised 12 August 1976.
The correctly located suppressive, who is then handled based on a
thorough understanding of the mechanics of PTS/SP phenomena form the
simplicity that is PTS tech. The tech of locating the suppressive source is
also fully covered. in the PTS/SP Checksheet and is a vital prerequisite
for PTS handlers.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by CS-5
LRH:JE:nt
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 20 OCTOBER 1976R
REVISED 29 JUNE 1977
Remimeo
SSO
DPE (Revisions in this type style)
Ethics Officers
PTS/SP Checksheet
PTS DATA
Based on a recent pilot it has become quite obvious that a full and
complete PTS handling would consist of:
A. PTSness handled terminatedly by interview or auditing by a
person trained on BPL 31 May 71RF.
B. Complete study and pass on the PTS/SP Checksheet, BPL 31 May
71RF Re-Revised 4 Mar 77.
The correctly located suppressive, who is then handled based on a
thorough understanding of the mechanics of PTS/SP phenomena form the
simplicity that is PTS tech. The tech of locating the suppressive source is
also fully covered in the PTS/SP Checksheet and is a vital prerequisite for
PTS handlers.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by CS-5
Revision assisted by
Anna Nordlof
Int Cross Check Br Dir
Int HQ
LRH:IE:AN:nt.lf
Copyright � 1976, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
DPE
Ethics Officer Issue II
PTS/SP Checksheet
PTS HANDLING
Once in a while I hear of PTS handlings that "didn't work" or "still
PTS" or some such. Or I'll come across such extremes as a PTS is virtually
an incurable leper to be shunned and kept isolated or almost everyone is
PTS to some degree so what can you really do about it. The basic thing to
realize is that PTSness, like any other case condition afflicting Man,
responds to plain old standard tech. But one has to have studied and
understood that tech to apply it, naturally.
I recall years ago in handling PTSes, that none of them at first knew
what PTS really meant or what it was all about even when they used the term
freely! So I recently called for a pilot to see what would be the effect of
a study method of curing PTSes.
FIRST PILOT
Before the final pilot was done, an earlier pilot was attempted by an
Aide which was not conducted as laid down. CS-5 reviewed the failed pilot
to find why so many failed on it. 4 out of 6 were never completed and the 2
that did failed.
CS-5 reported "What I found on these was that they uniformly were not
PTS in the first place or were PTS but that was not the major trouble with
the person. Three of the cases (2 on auditing and I on study) were out-
ethics, R/Sing, Exp Dn cases who were trying to use PTS as the reason for
their behavior. Thus handling their PTSness would not resolve anything. The
most interesting case here was the study one who realized that he was not
PTS and that that had been a wrong indication and that what was really
wrong with him was that he had bad intentions and was committing overts.
One of the audited cases had a similar realization but has not done as well
on post and did get very sick 2 months or so later. Of the other 3 pilot
cases in this first batch one could only come up with in-the-org terminals
so is another Exp Dn case and the other 2 assigned to study were severely
bugged students so never got off the ground (one has now finished the
course 4 months later). So that's what happened to the original pilot."
The second pilot was then ordered to determine the original
possibility, that people could study their way out of being PTS.
SECOND PILOT
Three were put onto the PTS/SP Checksheet to study and three were
handled by internes who had done the PTS/SP Checksheet themselves. The
cases handled by auditing/interview steps completed their handlings within
10 hours. The study cases averaged 4-6 weeks of part-time study. Two
studiers from the original pilot also completed the course. All were then
watched for bad originations to the Examiner, medical reports, ethics
trouble or trouble on post. In all cases, including those not yet complete
on study, none of these indicators showed up. One case originated case
troubles but this turned out to be one of the "Exp Dn" cases not PTSness.
On the study pilot the daily reports and success stories on completion
uniformly mention more certainty, more stability and being more at cause
with the data. Of particular interest is that three of the participants
"cogged" they were not actually PTS (yet evidence of real PTS sits had
gotten them on the project) but while they were studying they would align
past PTS handlings they didn't fully understand at the time, spot why past
PTS terminals were correct or incorrect, spot terminals who gave them a
hard time in the past and see why certain people behaved the way they did.
In short it
appears the studiers were blowing charge on their past PTS handlings and on
terminals in their life almost like an auditing session and while they were
saying not PTS, no longer PTS (now that they had the data) is probably
closer to the truth. All are reported to be doing well on post with no
illness, roller-coaster or ethics trouble.
The PTS handlers (who had done the PTS/SP pack) were of particular use
where the person had a study bug that needed handling before study could be
done and assisting in working out the handlings for PTS sits that were
uncovered. Also S&Ds and 10 Aug HCOB handlings and PTS interviews are not
Solo actions. And it takes hours, not intensives to handle.
FALSE PTS
As noted from the first pilot false PTSness must be watched for as
unhattedness, ignorance of Scientology basics for handling life, past bad
auditing uncorrected as well as unhandled bad intentions and personal out-
ethics can be mistaken for PTSness and won't resolve as PTSness. This
should be suspected when your "PTSes" start going above 20% of staff and
public.
SUMMARY
We have had the tech of PTSness for years, but it wasn't being fully
used and then got mixed in with Exp Dn. PTSness can be handled routinely
when the tech is fully known and applied. A PTS person can be brought to
cause over his situation through study of the PTS tech. This is vitally
important for staff. We can handle and the person himself can handle.
There is no substitute for understanding.
LRH:JE:nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1976 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED As assisted by CS-5
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
All Orgs
All HGCs INTERNESHIP AND HGC
Effective 1 December 1976
No new auditor may audit for the HGC, from the Tech Training Corps or
field or wherever, who has not done the interneships for his Class.
Any auditor now C/Sing or auditing may continue to do so until I Feb 77
providing he does his full interneship part-time and off production hours.
The completion of such interneship must occur before I Feb 1977.
Interne supervisors or Qual Secs may not hold back internes in
completion by extended and unreasonable auditing requirements.
Until 1 Feb 1977, auditors auditing in the HGC or C/Ses C/Sing for it
may count their HGC successes and hours as interneship auditing.
LRH:nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1976 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1976R
REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1977
Remimeo
(LRH ED 257 INT of 1 December 1974
revised and reissued as an HCOB)
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 96R
DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS
THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR CF, YOUR PC, YOUR STUDENT, STAFF MEMBER
OR YOUR OWN DELIVERY THAT A PREPARED LIST WON'T HANDLE.
"ARC broken CFs," blown students, demanded refunds, low success
stories, withdrawn auditors, ineffective staffs are pretty silly problems
to have these days.
Many years ago I developed a system called "Prepared Lists."
These isolated the trouble the pc was having in auditing without taxing
anyone's imagination and sending the auditor into a figure-figure on the
pc.
These prepared lists were assessed on an E-Meter. One took up the
biggest read first and then cleaned up all other reads.
Time has gone on. The system of prepared lists has been expanded to
include not only pcs but students and staff.
It may have gone overlooked that such lists now include anything that
could happen to a pc or student. In other words, prepared lists have become
very thorough.
WHO CAN USE
The only reason ever found for prepared lists not working was an
auditor's weak TR 1 and inability to read a meter.
Even this difficulty has been handled by "Qual Okay to Audit"
checksheets.
Before an auditor should be let near a prepared list he should be put
through at least six "Okay to Audit" short checksheets in Qual.
Qual is not fast flow. Things done in Qual are Method 4 Word Cleared
and starrated, with all demos and drills. Only if this is done can you have
some certainty that a prepared list will read on the pc and that the pc or
student will get handled.
These Qual "Okay to Audit" checksheets are done AFTER a student has
been trained and classed as an auditor. The "Okay to Audit" is for auditing
in an org whether staff or interne.
The checksheets are:
(1) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74RA Issue I
QUAL OKAY TO OPERATE AN E-METER
(2) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74R Issue II
QUAL OK NO. 2R, QUAL OK TO ASSESS PREPARED LISTS
(3) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue III
QUAL OK NO. 3, QUAL OK TO AUDIT LISTING AND NULLING
(4) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue IV
QUAL OK NO. 4, QUAL OK TO CORRECT LISTING AND NULLING
(5) Board Policy Letter 8 Nov 71RC
QUAL OK NO. 5RA, INTERNESHIPS ELECTRONIC ATTESTATION
FORM
(6) Board Policy Letter 20 July 70R Issue III Revised 25 Nov 74
TWO-WAY COMM CHECKSHEET
Only when these have been thoroughly and honestly studied, drilled and
done should an auditor be permitted to assess prepared lists on pcs and
students.
It takes standard auditor training to handle the points found reading
on a list.
CASE SUPERVISING
A C/S who is trained as a C/S must know what lists to use. And he must
see to it that his auditors are trained via the above checklists. Otherwise
the lists just won't read and the C/S, the pc and the org are left up the
creek!
LOTS of "lists that didn't read" are found in folders. I used to make a
practice of just having them nulled again by an auditor whose metering and
TRs were good and THEY READ AND THE CASE RESOLVED.
PC LISTS
1. HCO BULLETIN 24 NOVEMBER 1973RD, C/S SERIES 53RK, "SHORT HI-LO TA
ASSESSMENT C/S." This is a famous list. It solved the long long problem of
high and low TAs and really solved it. Unfortunately it has a name of being
done for high and low TAs. In truth it practically handles the whole repair
of any difficult case today! One assesses it Method 5. One handles the
reads from the top down. It can also be reassessed several times until it
F/Ns on a whole M5 assessment. It is quite remarkable what it will do for a
case that has been running badly or is bogged, quite in addition to
handling high and low TAs!
2. HCO BULLETIN 1 JANUARY 1972RB, "LIX HI-LO TA REVISED." This is the
same list as C/S 53RK above. It has been brought up-to-date. It gives the
whole question for each subject as in C/S 53RK and the same handling. It is
easier to use on a pc whose attention wanders or who is not very familiar
with terms.
3. HCO BULLETIN 29 OCTOBER 1971R, "INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST REVISED."
As Interiorization-Exteriorization problems (when they exist) have to be
handled before any other thing is handled, an auditor sometimes assesses
another list and then finds himself doing this list. "Int" appears on many
other lists and when it reads one does this list. One has to go back and
complete the original list of course. "Int" problems cause high TA,
headaches and general upset. I've begun to think after seeing a lot of
headache cases that maybe only Int-Ext problems cause headaches! Instead of
repairing Int, sometimes auditors will run it again and again. Also Int can
go flat to cog VVGIs on an early flow, even a recall flow. Then if one
insists on finishing the Int RD, one has trouble and I mean trouble. So
this is a valuable list.
4. HCO BULLETIN 15 DECEMBER 1968R, "L4BR" "FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING
ERRORS." An out list (meaning one done by listing and nulling, not a
prepared list) can raise more concentrated hell with a pc than any other
single auditing error. The amount of misemotion or illness which a wrong
list generates has to be seen to be believed. When a pc is ill after a
session or up to 3 days after, always suspect that a listing action done on
the pc had an error in it. It MUST be corrected. This prepared list L4BR
corrects lists of the listing and nulling variety. It can be run on old
lists,
current lists, general listing. There has been no reason to revise this
since 2 June 1972. It really works!
5. HCO BULLETIN 19 MARCH 1971, "LIST 1-C." This is the updated version
of the earliest list ever compiled. It is used during sessions at the
auditor's discretion and in other ways. It also prevents some pc from
insisting "It's an ARC Brk" (which never clears) when it's really a
withhold, a common error. It can also be addressed to life. Usually when a
session blows up, an L1C is used fast rather than just sit and ack!
6. HCO BULLETIN 11 APRIL 1971 RA, L3RD "DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR
LIST." This is the key list of Dianetic auditing and is the Dianetic
standby in case of trouble. As the Int RD is also Dianetics, while doing
it, one uses L3RD for trouble.
7. HCO BULLETIN 2 APRIL 1972RB ISSUE II, EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 3RB,
"L3 EXD RB." This is the prepared list for Expanded Dianetics.
8. HCO BULLETIN 21 JANUARY 1977, "FALSE TA CHECKLIST." This was a very
important discovery about TAs. One uses this when another list indicates a
false TA or one is suspected. Auditors have been known to get so desperate
about a pc's TA that they falsified worksheets. This (and C/S 53RK) make
that totally needless. I've seen this change a case from despair to
VVVVGIs!
9. HCO BULLETIN 16 APRIL 1972, "PTS RD CORRECTION LIST." It also gives
the expected actions of a PTS Rundown. Doing PTS Rundowns without this
prepared list handy can be risky.
10. HCO POLICY LETTER 7 APRIL 1970RA, "GREEN FORM." This was the earliest
Qual Saint Hill weapon (26 June 65) for case cracking. It is modernized up
to 29 Sept 74 in the above issue. Used for general case clean-up
particularly on an out rud type pc or when ruds won't fly. It is not used
to handle high or low TA.
11. HCO BULLETIN 30 JUNE 1971R, "EXPANDED GF 40RB." Called "GF 40X." This
is the "7 resistive type cases" at the end of the Green Form expanded out.
This is how you get those "earlier practices" and other case stoppers. This
done well gives a lot of extensive work in Dianetics. It's lengthy but
really pays off.
If you were to do a C/S 53RK Method 5, all handled, and to an F/Ning
list and then do a GF 40XRB, all handled, reassessed to an F/Ning list you
would "crack" most cases to a point where they ran well.
12. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 28 MAY 1974R, "FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR
INJURY AND ILLNESS." While you don't put the pc on the cans for this one,
you mark it as to the state the pc is in and it says what you do for
illness and injury. This one, done correctly, is how the minister runs the
medico out of business.
STUDENT LISTS
13. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1973R, "FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R." This is for
the handling of timid tech staff who back off from handling rough pcs.
14. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1974, "STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST." This is
the one that gets a bogged student sailing, gets a blown student back, gets
an auditor back auditing. It even cures the revolutionary student! This is
the master list for students-even students in grammar schools and colleges!
A real winner.
15. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE I, "STUDENT CORRECTION
LIST, STUDY CORR LIST-1." A list for correcting students on course.
STAFF LISTS
16. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE II, "COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION
LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 2R." This is to get the Course Supervisor going well.
17. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE III, "AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST,
STUDY CORR LIST 3." This one corrects auditors who are having a rough time.
18. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE IV, "CASE SUPERVISOR
CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 4." This one corrects Case Supervisors,
gets them back on the rails.
19. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RC ISSUE V, "EXECUTIVE
CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 5." This prepared list locates an
executive's troubles and indicates handling.
20. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 4 FEBRUARY 1972RD, "STUDY SERIES 7." A real
long workout for a person who won't study or who is having real trouble on
a course. Goes after it in depth. Can be used as a second list to Student
Rehab List above or by itself.
21. HCO BULLETIN 21 JULY 1971RD, WORD CLEARING SERIES 35RD, "WORD
CLEARING CORRECTION LIST REVISED." Usually written "WCCL." This is the
famous list that goes with Method 1 Word Clearing or with any Word Clearing
bog. Also corrects high and low TA WHEN it occurs in a Word Clearing
session. This is the Word Clearer's friendly friend.
22. HCO POLICY LETTER 9 APRIL 1972, "ETHICS, CORRECT DANGER CONDITION
HANDLING." Locates the trouble area that got him into a Danger condition.
Goes with the famous "3 May P/L" HCO PL 3 May 1972.
23. HCO POLICY LETTER 13 MARCH 1972, "ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES NO.
5." An invaluable text and list for PRODUCT CLEARING. It's a list of what
you do to clear products. From it a prepared list can be made.
24. HCO POLICY LETTER 23 MARCH 1972, ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES 11,
"FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM."
25. HCO POLICY LETTER 12 JUNE 1972, DATA SERIES 26, ESTO SERIES 18. A list
you assess to locate trouble an evaluator might be having. Also for slow
evaluators or slow students on a Data Series Course.
26. HCO BULLETIN 28 AUGUST 1970RA, "HC OUT-POINT-PLUS-POINT LISTS RA."
This is a prepared list that locates the out-points in a person's own
thinking. When people can't seem to evaluate (or think brightly) this list
will do wonders. Some Data Series Course students make no progress at all
until they are assessed on this list and handled.
27. HCO BULLETIN 2 DECEMBER 1974, "DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT." (Revised
from BTB 4 Dec 71 Issue II, replacing HCOB 4 Dec 71 Issue II R- I C
Assessment by Dynamics. ) This gets those dynamics that are charged and
handles them. Increases social personality and even can shift valences.
CONFIDENTIAL AND AO LISTS
28. HCO BULLETIN 21 SEPTEMBER 1970, "LP1." This is a Power Process
correction list for Power Processes. It is not used for Power Plus.
29. HCO BULLETIN 13 MAY 1965, "LIST 6 EW." This list is used in locating
bypassed charge when auditing R6EW.
30. HCO BULLETIN 2 AUGUST 1966, "LIST 7 CORRECTED." This list is used for
students Solo auditing on Grade VII.
31. HCO BULLETIN 12 OCTOBER 1969RA, "LDN OT III RA." This is the list
used to handle bypassed charge on OT III.
32. HCO POLICY LETTER 14 JANUARY 1972, "THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED."
This form is called a "Green Green Form" because it can be done over and
over. It is an auditing form used on OT III.
REPAIR LIST FOR PREPARED LISTS
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 DECEMBER 1975R, "REPAIR LIST FOR PREPARED LISTS" is
a basic prepared list which when used will clean up bypassed charge on
improperly done past prepared lists and handle a pc who begins by
protesting a repair list being done.
This list is only done if the pc sees a list and goes Bls or protests a
"C/S 53" being done. The auditor must have very good obnosis and be well
trained to do this switch of actions smoothly.
The Repair List for Prepared Lists should be reassessed and all reads
handled until it F/Ns on assessment or pa feeling happy about receiving
prepared lists and shows no further protest on the subject.
WORD LISTS FOR PREPARED LISTS
Nearly every prepared list has all its words on a separate sheet, ready
for Word Clearing on the pc. All the words on a list are cleared on a pc
without repeating the same word or asking the list question. Such lists are
issued for auditor convenience.
A list of these word lists is being issued as HCOB I Dec 74 so that you
can match them to the prepared lists in this bulletin.
OTHER LISTS
From time to time when a need for prepared list is found new ones will
be issued on different subjects.
One can REPAIR a pc or student or staff member. One can also FORWARD a
case into new areas with other prepared lists.
MIMEO
Some orgs backlog their mimeos.
The AVAILABILITY of lists to auditors is something which should NOT be
neglected. It is highly uneconomical as one loses re-signs and students and
staff when prepared lists are in non-existence in an org or even short
supply.
Tech is the atomic fuel an org runs on.
KEEP PREPARED LISTS IN SUPPLY FOR USE.
TRANSLATED ISSUES
In non-English speaking orgs lists must be very carefully translated
and mimeoed for use. In such orgs, more than any others, great care must be
taken to have and use lists as they keep tech straight where it tends to go
hearsay and verbal.
So, that's quite an array of prepared lists, isn't it?
If they are not in full use in your org don't wonder about your
Delivery Stats Why. Or your org and CF problems. It's a lack of full use of
this tech.
Hidden in these prepared lists is a wealth of tech that explodes into
wins for your org. your CF, your pcs and students.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Materials Chief FB
Revised by
Paulette Ausley
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:RS:PA:nt.lf.nt
Copyright � 1976, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER 1976
Issue I
Remimeo
All HCOs (Also issued as HCO PL 26 Oct 76
All Tech Divs Issue I, same title.)
All Qual Divs
All Courses C/S Series 97
AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF
Probably the most covert and vicious crime in auditing is falsifying an
auditing report.
At first glance, to someone who is trying to PR himself as an auditor
or to escape consequences of session goofs, this might not seem to be the
huge crime that it is.
When an auditing report is falsified, means of repairing the pc are
denied, out tech and a need for restudy or redrilling of materials is
covered up, out tech is spread about and the repute of the org and
Scientology are at risk.
There are many ways of falsifying an auditing report. Chief amongst
them is omission of vital data in the report. Another is faking the things
run or the pc's actions or reactions.
To the person doing this it may seem that he has covered up his
incompetence but in actual fact it is eventually detected.
A twice declared person recently messed up the cases of several VIPs by
simply omitting some of their disagreements with what was being done.
Three SPs, now declared, some years ago had a mutual understanding that
they would not put down each other's withholds. These three also falsified
auditing reports to the effect that they had run certain things on pcs "and
there was nothing on them," when in fact they either had not run them or
there was reaction which they did not put into the report. They messed up
about a dozen people before they were caught and it took many, many hours
of careful C/Sing and auditing to salvage those cases (and it also took
about two years). They made several hundred serious enemies for themselves
and today I doubt any Scientologist would even speak to them and their
names are remembered with scathing contempt.
It is not only easy to detect a falsified auditing report, it is also
inevitable that it will be detected.
The person whose auditing reports have been falsified is easy to spot
in folders and records. The auditor marks "VGIs, F/N" and the Examiner
notes bypassed charge and bad indicators. An auditor seeking to prevent
this being detected has been known to take the Examiner Report from the
folder but that there is no Examiner Report would be the first thing a C/S
would notice. Examiner Reports have been forged and exchanged with the
actual one but this too is very visible.
Lack of a proper success story points directly to out tech and if it is
not visible in the folder then that folder contains falsified auditing
reports.
The pc in the midst of his auditing, refuses to re-sign for more. An
inspection of folder either finds the out tech in the auditing reports or
it doesn't. If the Folder Error Summary finds no out tech, the next thing
that is looked for is falsified auditing reports and this is extended to
looking at the other cases this auditor has handled to see if there is any
similarity of reaction.
A D of P interview with the pc will reveal falsified auditing reports. It
will contain data that does not appear in the auditing reports. The first
thing suspect is the auditing reports.
Basically, correct tech applied by a competent auditor who has been
trained and interned, works and works every time. When it "doesn't work," a
C/S begins to look for the real scene. There are many ways he can ascertain
the actual scene. Amongst these are outside-the-door session taping,
monitors, interviews, lack of success stories, failures to declare,
failures to re-sign, Examiner Reports at variances with the session
reports, personal check-up into the case and many others.
The only thing which temporarily misleads a C/S is a falsified auditing
report. But in all our experience with these, the detection of such reports
is inevitable even if it occurs a long time afterwards.
The person who would falsify an auditing report is usually found to be
a suppressive with abundant R/Ses and evil intentions who never should have
been trained in the first place.
Therefore, the penalty for knowingly falsifying an auditing report in
order to make oneself seem more competent than one is or to hide departures
from the C/S or to omit vital data necessary to C/Sing, resulting in upsets
to a case and time spent in investigation by seniors, is actionable by a
Committee of Evidence and if the matter is proven beyond reasonable doubt,
a cancellation of all certificates and awards, a declare and an expulsion
order are mandatory.
Should the person perpetrating the falsification of auditing reports
run away (blow) before action can be taken, the result is the same and is
enforceable even if the person is not present.
A green auditor may look upon the offense as slight. If he is too
untrained to realize that proper application of tech works every time and
that improper application is a gross overt act, he may not realize the
seriousness of his action. This however cannot be pleaded as a defense. It
is not a light thing to end the hopes and close the door on a pc just
because one is trying to cover up his blunders. The blundering auditor can
be repaired by cramming and retraining. But only if it is known how he has
blundered. That in itself is nowhere near as serious as hiding the fact.
Honesty is the road to truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lf
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
All HCOs (Also issued as HCO PL 28 Oct 76, same title.)
All Tech Divs
All Qual Divs
All Courses
C/S Series 98
AUDITING FOLDERS,
OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS
(Ref: HCO PL 26 OCT 76 Issue I
HCO B 26 OCT 76)
Omissions from folders and complete loss of folders is a very serious
matter.
A Case Supervisor, as well as a Folder Error Summary auditor and the
auditor himself can be impeded greatly by folder omissions. Loss of folders
entirely is a much greater catastrophe.
While cases and even folders can be reconstructed and eventually
handled (at enormous trouble and time to the pc and technical people) this
does not minimize the offense.
Usually-Folder Pages are regarded too lightly as a post and are subject
to much transfer even when posted. The Director of Tech Services is often
far too lax in posting a Folder Archives I/C even as a double hat. Space
restrictions often impede the careful preservation of folders in orgs. But
all these posts and spaces are vital to a smooth delivery of auditing and
should not be lightly looked upon.
The commonest (and most senseless) omissions from folders are:
1. WORD CLEARING WORKSHEETS. These are done in Academies or
training or interne areas as well as the HGC and it is often an omitted
action to forward them to the person's pc folder. Often the lines to do so
are unknown or completely missing. Yet every metered Word Clearing action
should not only be the subject of a worksheet but also must be included in
the person's pc folder in date order. Word Clearers can fail to F/N a chain
or even fail to clear a word as a chain when it doesn't F/N. Such goofs can
mess up cases and leave a C/S perplexed as to how the pc was running well
one day and badly the next-yet there is no Word Clearing worksheet there,
so the fact of ANOTHER AUDITOR on the case is hidden.
2. QUAL WHY FINDING ACTIONS. As Why Finding also includes listing,
possibly the most vicious omission is the failure to include Why Finding
worksheets in the person's folder or even do a worksheet on it. Yet at
least one org has been temporarily wrecked by indiscriminate "Why Finding"
in Qual that resulted in wrong items and wrong lists and messed up the
cases of whole staffs. This poor Why Finding has led at times to Why
Finding becoming a restricted or forbidden practice. Qual worksheets of Why
Finding MUST be included in the person's folder along with any list made
which itself must include the question asked.
3. HCO WHY FINDING. These actions must also be the subject of
worksheets and must also be included in the person's folder.
4. ALL SEC CHECKS AND INTEGRITY PROCESS LISTS AND ACTIONS. It
doesn't matter who or what is doing the Sec Check, the resulting action is
NOT the property of the department or branch or person doing the Sec
Checking. A full worksheet must be made and ALL such actions done MUST be
included in the routine pc folder of the person.
As it is very vital that a pc's folder be COMPLETE as well as exist,
hereinafter the loss of a pc's folders and the failure to make worksheets
and include them in the person's pc folder shall be actionable by a
Committee of Evidence, to be convened by the Senior C/S of an org. and
applies to any person or auditor whether staff, mission or field.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright @ 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
**7612C_ _ Ron's Journal No. 28
MODERN MANAGEMENT
TECHNOLOGY DEFINED
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published December 1976
Modern Management Technology Defined is the key to understanding all
Scientology administrative terms and puts full understanding and
application of policy at your fingertips.
This vital companion to the OEC Volumes contains over 8,600 words and
13,200 definitions, including 2,000 non Scientology business terms. Near
the back of the book is a large list of Scientology abbreviations and their
definitions.
A team of researchers spent over a year combing through Ron's
administrative writings, policies, books and taped lectures extracting the
definitions for this dictionary, then many months were spent verifying that
the definitions as extracted were complete, clear and in context.
Not only does this dictionary make it easy to use Scientology
administrative policy, it is a key to understanding business and corporate
management.
This book is a must for anyone wanting a better understanding of
organization and administration; for Scientology admin course students; for
owners of OEC Volumes; for anyone who runs or works in a business, large
corporation or any organization.
690 pages, illustrated, hard cover with dust jacket. Available from
your nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct from the
publishers: Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 4833
Fountain Ave., East Annex, Los Angeles, California 90029, U.S.A.; or
Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V,
Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 DECEMBER 1976
Remimeo (Also HCO PL 6 Dec 76)
All Registrars
All Case Supervisors
All Ds of P ILLEGAL PCS, ACCEPTANCE OF
All Auditors
GO HIGH CRIME BULLETIN
It shall be a Committee of Evidence offense for a Case Supervisor or
auditor to C/S or accept for processing and process any pc:
1. Who is terminally (fatally) ill, regardless of what the org or
registrars may have promised or asserted. Such diseases as advanced
cancer are included.
2. Who has an extensive institutional history which includes heavy
drugs, shocks of various kinds and/or so-called psychiatric brain
operations.
3. Who has been denied processing by the Guardian Office for
reason of past history or connections or current state as it may
affect the safety and security of the org.
It shall also be a Committee of Evidence offense for any ED/CO, Org
Exec Sec. Technical Secretary, Director of Processing or other executive or
staff member to bring pressure or persuasion upon any Case Supervisor or
auditor to process such persons.
It is not that such cases cannot in many instances be handled. It is
that neither Scientology nor the org. but doctors and psychiatrists, have
brought about the condition and such conditions are outside the zone of
responsibility of the org.
Registering such pcs is already illegal, but where it has occurred
intentionally or accidentally, no one has the right to force such persons
upon Case Supervisors or auditors for any reason.
Any promise made by an org to such a person or his relatives is not
binding upon an organization or its staff and such promises are also a Comm
Ev offense.
Special petition may be made by the person concerned to the Guardian
Office, the representatives of which may act to correct injustices or
erroneous use of this Policy Letter. But the Guardian Office itself does
not have the right to persuade or insist that Case Supervisors or auditors
accept the person for processing unless it is very clearly demonstrated
that the person does not fall under any of the above three categories.
Doctors are too often careless and incompetent, psychiatrists are
simply outright murderers. The solution is not to pick up their pieces for
them but to demand medical doctors become competent and to abolish
psychiatry and psychiatrists as well as psychologists and other infamous
Nazi criminal outgrowths. Society and police agencies should deal with such
offenses. It is not up to Scientologists to salvage the wreckage created by
these professions, but to prevent it from happening in the first place by
reforming a degraded society.
Until such time as doctors have become fully competent and psychiatry
and psychology have been recognized for what they are and abolished, Case
Supervisors and auditors are actionable for surrendering their rights and
handling such. It is not that they cannot. They must not.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BDCS.LRH nt
Copyright � 1976 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 DECEMBER 1976RA
Remimeo REVISED 7 JULY 1978
All Auditors RE-REVISED 18 SEPTEMBER 1978
All Interne
Supervisors (Revisions in this type style)
All C/Ses
URGENT-IMPORTANT
C/S Series 99RA
SCIENTOLOGY F/N AND TA POSITION
Through verbal tech just located, it has been found that some auditors
have been ordered to disregard all F/Ns that were above 3.0 or below 2.0 on
the meter.
Auditors have also called F/Ns which were ARC break needles, thus
falsely indicating to the pc.
These two actions-disregarding actual F/Ns because the TA was not
between 2.0 and 3.0 and calling "F/Ns" that were actually ARC break needles-
have upset many preclears.
The outnesses here are: A. not considering pc indicators as senior and
B. not noting pc indicators when calling an F/N and C. ignoring and giving
junior importance to the technology covered in false TAs. (See list of
references at end of this HCOB or the Subject Index of the HCOB Volumes.)
Auditors have even been led to falsify worksheets (giving TA as in
range when it actually was not when calling an F/N) because they might "get
in trouble" for calling an F/N in the wrong range, such as 1.8 or 3.2.
The CORRECT procedure for out of range F/Ns is:
1. Look at the pc's indicators.
2. Call the F/N regardless of its range.
3. Mark down the ACTUAL TA position.
4. Handle the false TA at the earliest opportunity when it will
not intrude into the current cycle on which the pc is being
audited. (You don't interrupt a Quad R3RA, for instance, to handle
false TA; you complete it and then, when directed by the C/S, you
handle the false TA.)
5. On any pc you suspect has had his F/Ns disregarded because of
false TA, you C/S for and get run a repair and rehab of this error.
E-Meter cans can monitor or change TA position when the palms are too
dry or too wet or when the cans are too big or too small or when the wrong
hand cream is used. The E-Meter does not read on hand moisture alone as was
long believed by people in electronics. But TA depends upon resistance to
electrical current in the palms, leads, and meter as well as its main
resistance which happens to be mental masses or lack of them.
To simply tell some interne "Always disregard an F/N not in correct
range" is to set him up for loses and set the pc up for crashes. The
correct information is that an F/N which isn't in range is accompanied by
pc indicators that indicate whether it is an F/N or not. AND indicates you
better get the false TA handled fast as soon as it won't
interrupt the current cycle. AND you always note where it F/Ned so the C/S
can C/S for false TA handling.
Where an ARC break needle (which looks like an F/N) is observed,
whether it is in range or out of range (2.0 to 3.0 or below 2.0 or above
3.0) you LOOK at the pc and establish the pc's indicators before falsely
calling an F/N. A pc who is about to cry is NOT an F/Ning pc and if you
indicate an F/N to that pc you will further the ARC break and suppress the
emotional charge that is about to come off.
REPAIR
Where the above matters have not been fully understood and errors have
occurred on pcs, it must be assumed that:
1. Auditors have falsified their worksheets as to TA position and
thus built up withholds and made themselves blowy.
2. That every pc who has ever had high or low TA trouble has had
F/Ns disregarded and ARC break F/Ns falsely indicated.
3. That a briefing and drilling of all internes and auditors must
occur on this HCOB.
4. That a brief program of clean-up of disregarded F/Ns and
falsely called ARC break F/Ns be done on every pc.
5. That every such pc be considered as having false TA troubles
and these must be C/Sed for and corrected.
6. That all auditors and internes be drilled on all HCOBs relating
to pc indicators.
SAMPLE CLEAN-UP C/S
Disregard TA position, use only F/Ns and pc indicators in doing this
C/S.
1. It has been found that some of your F/Ns (release points) may
have been disregarded by past or present auditors.
2. Have you ever felt an F/N (release point or end of an action)
had been bypassed on your case? . . .
3. Find and rehab the . . . overrun of the release point to F/N.
Check for any other bypassed F/Ns and rehab them.
4. Have you ever felt an F/N should not have been indicated by the
auditor when it was? . . .
5. Find the . . . point and get in Suppress on it and complete the
action. Check "Are there any other F/Ns which should not have been
indicated by the auditor when they were?" and handle as above.
6. Find and run the ARC breaks bypassed, with ARC break handling.
7. Find and handle the false TA in totality.
DIANETIC F/Ns
An F/N seen by the auditor in running R3RA is not called until the full
Dianetic
EP is reached.
An auditor running R3RA is NOT looking for F/Ns. He is looking for the
postulate which is sitting at the bottom of the chain he is running.
The EP of a Dianetic chain is always always always the postulate coming
off.
The postulate is what holds the chain in its place. Release the
postulate and the chain blows. That's it.
The auditor must recognize the postulate when the pc gives it, note the
VGIs, call the F/N and end off auditing that chain.
An F/N seen as the incident is erasing is not called.
The pc does not have to state that the incident has erased. Once he has
given up the postulate, the erasure has occurred. The auditor will see an
F/N and VGIs. NOW the F/N is called. F/Ns are not indicated until the EP of
postulate off, F/N and VGIs is reached.
It's the postulate-not the F/N that we are going for in New Era
Dianetics.
POWER F/Ns
F/Ns are disregarded in Power.
Each Power Process has its own end phenomena and is ended only when
that is obtained.
REFERENCE HCOBs FOR FALSE TA
1. HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
2. HCOB 15 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
3. HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA ADDITION
4. HCOB 18 Feb 72R I FALSE TA ADDITION 3
5. HCOB 21 Jan 77RA FALSE TA CHECKLIST
6. HCOB 23 Nov 73RA DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA
7. HCOB 23 Apr 75R VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA
PC INDICATORS HCOBs
1. HCOB 29 Jul 64 GOOD INDICATORS AT LOWER LEVELS
2. HCOB 28 Dec 63 INDICATORS PART ONE, GOOD
INDICATORS
3. HCOB 23 May 71R RECOGNITION OF RIGHTNESS OF THE
BEING
Issue VIII Rev. 4.12.74
4. HCOB 22 Sep 71 THE THREE GOLDEN RULES OF THE C/S
HANDLING AUDITORS
5. HCOB 21 Oct 68R FLOATING NEEDLE
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rb.dr
Copyright � 1976, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 55
HOW TO WIN WITH WORD CLEARING
By actual application of the tech Word Clearers can obtain much higher
results and wins. Several recent examples have come up where some top tech
and admin personnel were not duplicating issues and instructions yet they
had been word cleared on these materials with no MUs found. When word
cleared again by someone who really knew his business the MUs came off for
hours with a resurgence of activity at the end. In a number of the cases
success stories were written about never having found a misunderstood word
before! All of the examples cited had the following common denominators:
1. The Word Clearer could really handle a meter and make a
question read.
2. The Word Clearers had personal certainty on the workability of
Word Clearing and could apply it exactly and find MUs to rave
results.
TRs AND METERING
The fact that most Word Clearing starts off with the phrase "I am not
auditing you" does not mean that TRs and metering do not apply. Quite the
contrary they are vital skills that need to be kept sharp by daily TRs just
like any auditor and a weekly or monthly Qual check on TR 1 and the ability
to make a question read. The reason is quite simple. A Word Clearer must
grasp that all forms of Word Clearing that he can apply, either metered or
unmetered, were developed to help the individual find the MUs he was unable
to find himself. One must assume that the person has already looked up all
the MUs he could find (it is after all an ethics offense to fail to clarify
words not understood) and is now putting himself in the hands of the Word
Clearer to find any MUs that may be just beyond his awareness. Any lack of
impingement on metered Word Clearing or reasonableness about slips and
slurs or missed definitions on non-metered Word Clearing will leave a
person "knowing" he has no MUs but wondering why he still has difficulty
with the subject or post.
It may just be that people who find themselves resistive to Word
Clearing have not grasped these points either, and wonder why they need
Word Clearing when they don't "think" they have MUs.
PERSONAL CERTAINTY
Word Clearing works. There is no shortage of people who can attest to
that. The only times Word Clearing would seem to fail would be if there
were errors such as:
a) No reads or missed reads.
b) Ignored slips and flubs in non-metered Word Clearing.
c) Getting off into considerations or confusions without getting
to the MUs that always exist at the bottom and then getting the MUs
fully defined.
The remedy is simple. If one has been word cleared on an area without a
resolution of the original difficulty then MUs have been missed and one
need only report right back to a Word Clearer and say "I want my MUs
found!" In some cases a WCCL may be required, but more often than not it's
just find the missed MUs.
For anyone who has not yet experienced what it's like to find a real MU
then just report to a Word Clearer and pick any subject or area of
difficulty and start getting the
MUs found until the subject or area now makes sense. Continue this on as
many subjects as needed to leave no doubt as to the workability of Word
Clearing. (The case gain from a real MU found can sometimes rival the
biggest wins in auditing.) Any Word Clearer must have this certainty and
pass it on to those he word clears.
The wins and gains are there for the taking. A better functioning org
with highly productive staff and public is the reward. You deserve it. Just
follow the tech as laid out in the Word Clearing Series and you will have
it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by CS-4/5
for the
BDCS:LRH:JE:lf
Copyright t 1977 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
ETHICS AND WORD CLEARING
(References: HCO PL 4 April 72R
ETHICS AND STUDY TECH and HCO PL
16 November 73 STUDY TECH & POST)
While it has been made a Court of Ethics offense to fail to clarify
words not understood no provision has been made for this failure stemming
from faulty Word Clearing which does not locate the MUs.
THEREFORE:
8. Any Word Clearer who word cleared materials on which
misunderstoods have been found at a later date SHALL BE SUMMONSED
TO A COURT OF ETHICS.
The charge is OUT TECH.
The references for this Policy Letter are still very much in force.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by CS-4/5
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:JE:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The two HCO PLs mentioned as references above are included on pages 203
and 221 of this volume.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 JANUARY 1977RA
Remimeo REVISED 13 FEBRUARY 1977
Tech & Qual REVISED 5 MARCH 1977
All Levels
All Tech (Revision in this type style)
Check sheets
HANDLING A FALSE TA
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R False TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71R False TA Addition
HCOB 15 Feb 72R False TA Addition 2
HCOB 18 Feb 72R False TA Addition 3
HCOB 23 Nov 73RA Dry & Wet Hands Make False TA
Book: E-Meter Essentials
Book: Introduction to the E-Meter
HCOB 10 Dec 76 F/N & TA Position
HCOB 21 Jan 77R False TA Checklist
HCOB 13 Jan 77 Handling a False TA is revised to show LRH quotes (which
are indicated by quotation marks).
"It has recently been discovered that auditors have been mishandling
false TA by assessing with the meter to find what the cause of the false TA
is instead of directly checking the pc themselves.
"A recent example of this is the False TA Checklist (HCOB 29 Feb 72RA
Revised 23 April 75) was being used by assessment on the meter to try to
find the pc's false TA cause. The false TA was not remedied as the auditor
never even felt the pc's hands! Never even checked the pc's grip! Never
felt what the pc's hands felt like with cream on them! The auditor just
checked the lines on the meter and when a read was obtained the pc was
asked and nothing came of it. The false TA, now being unhandled, due to the
auditor's confusion caused the pc to be audited over further false TA and
drove the pc into desperation. I had to jump in and handle this one. All I
did was check the grip and I found that the can size was way too big and
part of the pc's hand (the palm cup) was not touching the can thus causing
the TA to read higher = false TA. The cans had to be reduced to 1 1/4 inch
diameter aluminum tubing! This particular pc was also misapplying hand
cream. The quantity was incorrect and the way the pc was putting it on was
not handling the false TA. This pc needed to put Vaseline Intensive Care on
extensively then wipe off the hands with Kleenex and then put a bit more on
and rub it all over the hands and ensure that the thumbs were being
covered. One more factor that messed up the case was the sensitivity was
set too high and consequently F/Ns were missed and the TA shot up."
Another example of this was we had a pc who constantly had low TA F/Ns.
Upon checking his grip we discovered that he held the cans so tight that it
caused his hands to sweat and part of the hand was actually off the cans.
Adjusting the grip handled the false TA. This pc then started to cognite
that he was really a fast pc after all and there was nothing wrong with
him.
We had another interesting one. This particular pc crossed her legs and
had cans that were too big. By having her uncross her legs and recognizing
that the can size was off and needed changing to 1 3/4" diameter aluminum
tubing remedied her false TA.
So you have to watch it. Make sure that the sensitivity is set
correctly for that pc so you don't miss the F/Ns.
"NONE OF THIS WAS DONE BY AUDITOR ASSESSING A LIST. IT WAS DONE BY
OBSERVING THE PC'S HANDLING OF CANS AND POSITIONS AND SEEING WHAT IT DID TO
TA POSITION.
"The main point here was the auditor thought that a false TA was think and
would register on the meter. That is as silly as asking the meter if you
should buy ice cream today or not. The meter can't answer when the answer
is required of the preclear. How the hell would the meter know if the pc's
hands were dry or cold. The auditor has to feel them, touch them, check for
dryness by feeling them. Do they FEEL dry? Do they FEEL cold? Are the pc's
feet so cold that no circulation gets through? Do you know without feeling
them? Does the hand cream you are using dry up? How do you know without
feeling the pc's hands? I have known a pc to say no it hasn't dried up
because the pc hated wearing cream and didn't want to put more on. So feel
the hands. Don't just ask the pc and then assume that that is it. You will
mess up cases and won't handle the false TA.
"False TA is in the physical universe. It is something that really
exists. When you start checking for meter reads you are violating this law.
It is in the physical universe not the pc's think or bank. It can badly
mess up a case to not find the cause of false TAs and then carry on with
auditing."
Understanding the meter and what the meter reads on and understanding
false TA and what causes it are the basics behind finding a false TA and
remedying it so that the pc can happily continue on with auditing and
advance.
"If you think that you have solved a false TA yet the pc still has high
or low TA F/Ns then you haven't solved it at all and you had better roll up
your sleeves and get bright and go in there and find it. And the way you do
this is to check the pc. What do the hands feel like? What type of clothing
is the pc wearing? Feel for tight clothes. Don't just take the pc's word.
Maybe they like wearing tight shoes but look at that 4.5 F/N. Let them wear
tight shoes out of session but get rid of those tight shoes in session so
you can get an accurate reading meter."
Don't use this to hassle pcs and interject it into sessions whenever
you please. When you see a false TA phenomena note it down and the C/S will
include it in the program to be handled. This is covered in HCOB 10 Dec 76
F/N AND TA POSITION.
There is no pc on this planet or any planet that wants to experience
over-repair and misery due to false TAs. You will be doing them a great
service to handle it for them so they can happily be audited after that.
Don't Q&A with the pc's considerations just find what 'in the physical
universe' is causing the false TA and remedy that in the physical universe.
Note: The False TA Checklist has been rewritten and issued as HCOB 21
Jan 77R.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Paulette Ausley
Revised to show
quotation marks by
Paulette Ausley
2nd Revision assisted
by Paulette Ausley
LRH Tech Expeditor
for the
BCDS:LRH:PA:nf.lf.nt
Copyright t) 1977 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JANUARY 1977RA
REVISED AND REISSUED 7 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
All Levels
All Auditors (Revisions in this type style)
All Tech
Checksheets
FALSE TA CHECKLIST
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA ADDITION
HCOB 15 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
HCOB 18 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 3
BTB 24 Jan 73R 1I EXAMINER & FALSE TA
HCOB 24 Nov 73RC C/S 53RK
HCOB 23 Nov 73RA DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA
HCOB 13 Jan 77RA HANDLING A FALSE TA
"This Bulletin cancels HCOB 29 February 1972RA Revised 23 April 1975 as
it is misleading and has caused some auditors to assess the pc on the meter
to find the cause of false TA instead of checking directly with the pc."
This Bulletin reinstates the False TA Checklist with specific handlings
that are directly from the issues that I wrote on false TA.
"The following are the items to be checked by an auditor on any pc. It
need only be done once unless the check itself is suspected false, or if
conditions of the pc's hands, etc. change.
"The checklist is kept in the pc folder and is entered on the Folder
Summary as an action done.
"The value of operating with correct can size should not be
underestimated, the reference HCOBs state why."
The auditor signs and answers the following points on the checklist.
The auditor must obtain information by checking the pc's hands himself or
herself to see if the hands are dry or wet. The cause of false TA is in the
physical universe and that is where the check is done. It is not done by
asking the pc or checking the questions on the pc for meter reads. So the
auditor would feel the hands of the pc to establish if they are dry or wet,
would feel the pc's hands with cream on them to see if the cream has dried
up, would see if the pc's hands cup so as to form an area that does not
touch the cans and so forth. False TA is not think or mental mass. It is in
the physical universe and that is where it has to be handled for it to be
remedied. The handling sheet follows the items mentioned below.
"R-Factor to pc: 'I am going to check the cans, your hands and various
other things to adjust everything for best accuracy."'
(See numbered list at back for handlings. Each number in the checklist
is exactly represented in the handling by the same number to make it easy
to switch to the handling section when doing this checklist.)
1. Is the meter charged fully? ________
2. Is the meter trimmed correctly? ________
3. Are the leads connected to the meter and cans? ________
4. Are the cans rusty? ________
5. Are pc's hands excessively dry requiring hand cream? ________
6. Are the pc's hands excessively wet requiring powder? ________
7. The pc is NOT being told continually to wipe his hands?
________
8. The pc's grip on the cans is NOT being continually checked by the
auditor in a way that interrupts the pc? ________
9. TA position on large cans? Size approx 4 1/2 inches by 3 inches or 11
cm by 8 cm ________
10. TA position on medium cans? Size approx 4 7/8 inches by 2 5/8 inches
or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm ________
11. TA position on small cans? Size approx 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches
or 9 cm by 5 cm ________
11A. Can size for a child is incorrect? Size can go down to photographic
aluminum 35 mm film cans for a child. Size approx 2 inches by 1 3/16
inches or 5 cm by 3 cm Note down TA position. ________
11B. If the above mentioned can sizes aren't correct for the pc's hands
other sizes can be tried. 1 1/4" tubing 1 3/4" tubing as well as other
can size checked to see which fits the pc's hand. Note down TA
position. ________
12. Are the cans too large for the pc? ________
13. Are the cans too small for the pc? ________
14. Are the cans just right in size? ________
15. Are the cans cold? ________
16. Are the pc's hands dry or calloused? ________
17. Does the pc have arthritic hands? ________
18. Does the pc loosen his grip on the cans? ________
19. Check the pc's grip, does he hold the cans correctly? (See E-Meter
Drill 5.) ________
20. Is the pc hot? ________
21. Has the pc slept well? ________
22. Is the pc cold? ________
23. Is the pc hungry? ________
24. Is it too late at night? ________
25. Is the auditing being done not in the pc's normal regular awake
hours? ________
26. Are there rings on the pc's hands? (Remove any rings.) ________
27. Is the pc wearing tight shoes? ________
28. Is the pc wearing tight clothes? ________
29. Is the pc using the wrong hand cream? ________
30. Is the application of the hand cream correct and does it cover the
entire hand? ________
31. Is the chair the pc is sitting in comfortable? ________
32. Is it actually chronic high or low TA case condition? ________
33. Has the pc gone into despair over his TA? ________
The handling of these points is stated in the reference HCOBs.
The handling of high or low TA after checking these points is by C/S
53RK, Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S.
The way to be sure of a C/S 53RK or Hi-Lo TA list is by continued
assessment and handling of these lists until an F/N on assessment is
gotten.
So standard tech handles the high and low TA. The C/S Series gives more
data on the subject.
FALSE TA CHECKLIST HANDLING SHEET
1. IS THE METER FULLY CHARGED?
Handling: "Keep a meter charged at least one hour for every 10 of auditing
for 240 AC volt charging current, or 2 hrs for every 10 of auditing on
a 110 AC volt charging current.
"Before each session snap the knob over to TEST. The needle should
hit hard on the right side of the face. It can even bounce. If the
needle doesn't snap to the right hard or if it doesn't quite get there
on TEST, then that meter will go flat in mid-session and give false TA
and no reads or TA on hot subjects." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 1971R False TA.)
2. IS THE METER TRIMMED CORRECTLY?
Handling: "A meter can be improperly trimmed (not set at 2.0 with the trim
knob) and can give a false TA position. When a meter is not left on a
minute or two before trimming, it can drift in the session and give a
slightly false TA.
"The trim can quietly be checked in mid-session by snapping out the
jack where the cord goes into the box and putting the TA on 2, seeing
if the needle is now on SET. If not, the trim knob can be moved to
adjust it. The jack is quietly slipped back in. All without distracting
the pc." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 1971R False TA.)
3. ARE THE LEADS CONNECTED TO THE METER AND CANS?
Handling: "A properly set up meter with cans (electrodes) fitted to a pc
who is holding them properly IS ALWAYS CORRECT." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct
1971R.) Reference for setting up a meter is covered in E-Meter Drills
book EM 4.
4. ARE THE CANS RUSTY?
Handling: "Corroded cans can falsify TA. Get new ones now and then." LRH
(HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
5. ARE PC'S HANDS EXCESSIVELY DRY REQUIRING HAND CREAM?
Handling: "A quick test is have the pc put the cans under his armpits and
you'll see if it's his calloused or chemically dried out hands. The
excessively dry hand is seen as shiny or polished looking. It feels
very dry. The correct treatment is to use a hand cream such as Vaseline
Intensive Care Lotion (obtainable from any cosmetics store) not a
greasy hand cream or vanishing cream. A good hand cream rubs all the
way into the hand and leaves no excess grease. Hand cream is usually
smeared on, rubbed in and can then be thoroughly wiped off. The hands
will usually produce, then, a normal TA and meter response." LRH (HCOB
23 Nov 73RA Revised 23 April 75 Revised 26 Jan 77 Dry and Wet Hands
Make False TA.)
6. ARE THE PC'S HANDS EXCESSIVELY WET REQUIRING POWDER?
Handling: "If the TA is low, check if the pc's hands are wet. If so have
him wipe them and get a new read. It is usually found that the 1.6 was
really 2.0 . . . Have the pc wipe hands. LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
"Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are many
brands of these, often a powder or spray. It can be wiped off after
application & should work for two to three hours." LRH (HCOB 23 Apr
73RA.)
7. THE PC IS NOT BEING TOLD CONTINUALLY TO WIPE HIS HANDS?
Handling: Above per wet hands.
8. THE PC'S GRIP ON THE CANS IS NOT BEING CONTINUALLY CHECKED BY THE
AUDITOR IN A WAY THAT INTERRUPTS THE PC?
Handling: "Keep the pc's hands in sight. Check the pc's grip. Get smaller
cans." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
9. TA POSITION FOR LARGE CANS?
Handling: "For a normal or large handed pc the can size is about 4 7/8ths
inches by 2 5/8ths inches or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm. This can be altered as
big as 4 1/2 inches by 3 inches diameter or 11 cm by 8 cm. This is
standard." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
10. TA POSITION ON MEDIUM CANS?
Handling: Covered above.
11. TA POSITION ON SMALL CANS?
Handling: "This can should be 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8th inches or 9 cm by 5
cm diameter or thereabouts. A small child would be lost even with that
can. So a small 35 mm film can could be used. This is 2 inches long by
1 3/16ths diameter or 5 cm by 3 cm. This works but watch it as these
cans are aluminum. They do work but test for true read with a slightly
larger can and then trim to adjust for the aluminum if any different.
"Cans of course should be steel with a thin tin plating. Regular soup
cans. Can size to match the pc avoids slack can grip or tiring the
hands into going slack, giving the auditor 3.2 F/Ns and trouble." LRH
(HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
11A. CAN SIZE FOR A CHILD IS INCORRECT?
Handling: Size can go down to photographic aluminum 35 mm film cans for a
child. Note down TA position.
11B. IF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CAN SIZES AREN'T CORRECT FOR THE PC'S HANDS
OTHER SIZES CAN BE TRIED.
Handling: 1 1/4" tubing or 1 3/4" tubing as well as other can size checked
to see which fits the pc's hand. Note TA position.
12. ARE THE CANS TOO LARGE FOR THE PC?
Handling: "Can size to match the pc avoids slack can grip or tiring the
hands into going slack." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
Check the pc's grip and see if the hand is touching all of the can
and if the size is comfortable. (Ref: HCOB 13 Jan 77RA Handling a False
TA.)
13. ARE THE CANS TOO SMALL FOR THE PC?
Handling: Per above. Check how the pc is holding the cans and if the entire
hand is on the cans and if they are comfortable and adjust accordingly
per above.
14. ARE THE CANS JUST RIGHT FOR THE PC?
Handling: Check the grip and see if the can size is correct for the pc. Do
the cans comfortably fit the pc's hands with the hand touching the cans
so it gets an accurate reading on the meter? If the can size is correct
then you must ensure that the grip is also correct on the cans.
15. ARE THE CANS COLD?
Handling: "Regardless of can size, cold E-Meter electrodes tend to give
a much higher tone arm reading particularly on some pcs.
"Until the cans warm up, the reading is generally false and is false
in the direction of high. Some pcs are 'cool blooded' and the shock of
ice cold cans can drive the TA up and it takes awhile to drift down.
"A practice which gets around this is for the auditor or Examiner to
hold the cans briefly until they are warm and then give them to the pc.
A variation is for the auditor or Examiner to put the cans under his
armpits while setting up. This warms them. There are probably many
other ways to warm up cans to body temperature." LRH (HCOB 12 Nov 71RA
Revised 26 Jan 77.)
16. ARE THE PC'S HANDS DRY OR CALLOUSED?
Handling: Covered above under pc's hands excessively dry requiring hand
cream.
There are ways to apply the hand cream so that it is correct for that
individual pc and does handle the false TA. You can spread it on
extensively then wipe it off and then rub a bit more in ensuring the
thumbs are included is one way. (Ref: HCOB 13 Jan 77RA.)
The point is to feel the hands with the cream on them to see if it
has handled the excessively dry hand that is seen as shiny or polished
looking.
And it now should no longer feel dry. (HCOB 23 Nov 73RA Revised 23
Apr 75, Revised 26 Jan 77.) The correct treatment is to use a hand
cream such as Vaseline Intensive Care Lotion (obtainable from any
cosmetics store) not greasy hand cream or vanishing cream.
A good hand cream rubs all the way into the skin and leaves no excess
grease. This restores normal electrical contact. Such a hand cream
would only have to be applied once per session-at session start-as it
lasts for a long while.
If a cream leaves smears on a can, it is too heavily applied or too
little absorbed. (HCOB 23 Apr 75R, Revised 26 Jan 77.)
17. DOES THE PC HAVE ARTHRITIC HANDS?
Handling: "A rare pc is so crippled with arthritis that he doesn't make
contact fully with the cans. This gives high TA. Use wide wrist straps
and you'll get a right read." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
18. DOES THE PC LOOSEN HIS GRIP ON THE CANS?
Handling: Check the grip. Does the angle of the cans go across the palms of
the pc? Is the natural curl of the fingers sufficient to hold the cans
in place, and is the placement of the cans at an angle ensuring that
the maximum skin area is touching the cans? (Ref: Book of E-Meter
Drills. ) See if the palm is touching the can and not elevated off.
(Ref: HCOB 13 Jan 77RA.)
19. CHECK THE PC'S GRIP, DOES HE HOLD THE CANS CORRECTLY?
Handling: Covered in above section. Also check to see if the pc is holding
the cans so tight that it is causing the hands to sweat and read
falsely low. (Ref: HCOB 13 Jan 77RA.)
20. IS THE PC HOT?
Handling: Get a fan in the room or handle the room so that it is cooler and
the pc comfortable.
21. HAS THE PC SLEPT WELL?
Handling: Don't audit a pc who has not had sufficient rest or is physically
tired. (Ref: HCO PL 14 Oct 68R The Auditor's Code.)
22. IS THE PC COLD?
Handling: "A pc who is too cold sometimes has a falsely high TA. Wrap
him in a blanket or get a warmer auditing room. The auditing
environment is the responsibility of the auditor." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct
71R.)
23. IS THE PC HUNGRY?
Handling: Get the pc something to eat and don't audit a pc who has not had
enough to eat or is hungry. (Ref: HCO PL 14 Oct 68R The Auditor's
Code.)
24. IS IT TOO LATE AT NIGHT?
Handling: "Between 2 and 3 AM or late at night a pc's TA may be very high.
The time depends on when he sleeps usually. This TA will be found
normal in regular hours." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
25. IS THE AUDITING BEING DONE NOT IN THE PC'S NORMAL REGULAR AWAKE
HOURS?
Handling: Covered above.
26. ARE THERE RINGS ON THE PC'S HANDS?
Handling: "Rings on the pc's hands must always be removed. They don't
influence TA but they give a false rock slam." LRH (HCOB 24 Oct 71R.)
If the ring can't come off use a small strip of paper around them to
shield the ring touching the can.
27. IS THE PC WEARING TIGHT SHOES?
Handling: Remove them. (Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R, HCOB 13 Jan 77RA.)
28. IS THE PC WEARING TIGHT CLOTHES?
Handling: If it turns out that tight clothing is affecting the TA ensure
that the pc doesn't wear tight clothes in future sessions. If possible
have the pc remove the tight clothing and see what the effect was that
it had on the TA and make sure no more tight clothes are worn in future
sessions.
29. IS THE PC USING THE WRONG HAND CREAM?
Handling: Using the reference materials find the right hand cream and test
it on the pc. Note TA position.
30. IS THE APPLICATION OF THE HAND CREAM CORRECT AND DOES IT COVER THE
ENTIRE HAND?
Handling: Watch how the pc puts on hand cream and see if it covers the
entire hand, thumb included. If not then have the pc put on hand cream
covering the entire hand and pick up the cans and note TA position.
Some pcs may have to put cream on and wipe it off and then re-apply it.
(Ref: HCOB 13 Jan 77RA.)
31. IS THE CHAIR THE PC IS SITTING IN COMFORTABLE?
Handling: Get a new chair that is comfortable for the pc.
32. IS IT ACTUALLY A CHRONIC HIGH OR LOW TA CASE CONDITION?
Handling: C/S Series 53RK or Hi-Lo TA Assessment. Done to F/Ning
assessment.
33. HAS THE PC GONE INTO DESPAIR OVER HIS TA?
Handling: Handle the false TA with using this list as a guideline so that
the cause of false TA is found and fully handled with the pc by the
various handlings covered above. When false TA is handled check TA
worries, TA hassles and L1C best read.
This handling sheet is used in conjunction with the items that are
checked. This gives you the way to handle them.
Refer to reference material in reference section above for further data on
handling a false TA.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Paulette Ausley
LRH:PA:RS:dr Revisions assisted by
Copyright � 1977,1978 Paulette Ausley
by L. Ron Hubbard and
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Rick Sheehy
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
All Course
Supervisors IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY
All D of Ps TO ACHIEVE IT
All C/Ses
The dominating factor of tech being in, is whether the auditor really
wants to do a good job and help the pc. It is a matter of professional
competence and pride.
If the auditor does not have this there is no amount of rules, reading
or supervision that will bring about technical successes.
Fortunately the vast majority of auditors have a high professional
conscience and are willing to study, drill and do everything possible to
perfect their tech. The Course Supervisor, the D of P. the C/S and Qual
Cramming terminals must realize this and must do all possible to fortify it
and must abstain from invalidations and accusations and injustices which
tend to nullify it.
From this springboard of belief in the auditor and a willingness on the
part of those training and handling him, to strengthen the auditor's
determination to be professionally competent, in-tech will only then
blossom in an org.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo
All Auditors
All Supervisors
All Interneships
URGENT AND IMPORTANT
TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP
Auditors and Scientologists for 27 years have tended to be suspicious
of HCOBs and Policy Letters not written by myself.
Until a few months ago my opinion was that this, while flattering, was
not entirely justified.
However, these last few months have sharply changed my belief into
total agreement with all those who have expressed some fear of
reinterpretations of bulletins by others.
I have been engaged for some months now in a round-up of out tech
issues.
And I have found, I am sorry to say, that mice have been gnawing at the
pillars of the Bridge, putting up traffic barriers and false detour signs.
I have been finding serious out tech issues and correcting them.
Whether because of misunderstood words (the commonest cause of out tech
alterations) or other reasons, there have been a staggering number of tech
sectors that have been corrupted by issues by others that alter-ised.
The corrections I have been doing have been, are being or will be
issued shortly. However, not all auditors and Scientologists keep pace with
current issues and so I am here giving you a rapid summary of the gross
departures from standard tech which have occurred in the past 3 or 4 years
and their corrections.
So you were right!
A very few people (3 or 4) have wittingly or unwittingly brought about
outnesses which could easily make the difference between successful case
handling and failed cases.
Action has been taken to handle them and there are a great many good
people at work now in compiling and reissuing the workable tech which I
developed in the first place.
It is now forbidden to write an HCOB or an HCO PL and sign my name to
it.
If anyone helped compile it or wrote it, my name is followed by
"Assisted by_____" the person who helped get it back together at my
directions.
Also no Board Technical Bulletin may cancel an HCOB.
So from here on you are relatively safe.
I am always the first to tell you and this is no exception.
TECH CORRECTIONS
There follows here a long list of incorrect procedures or data found to
have been issued.
Also a brief rundown of the correct procedure will be found, which is
the correct and standard tech.
What makes tech correct? When it doesn't get results it is incorrect.
When it gets the expected result it is correct.
My own writings and researches are based wholly upon things that got
and get results.
When another, through misunderstood words or other reasons,
"interprets" or changes the original tech, it has been the general
experience that results are not obtained.
By studying this list you may very well find some alter-ised points
which caused you to have trouble or which caused confusion.
Therefore, the subjects themselves are described in summary form.
Not all issues are out yet which accomplish full correction. Their HCOB
numbers therefore cannot be given. Some of the issues are not yet released
but will be soon. However, there is no reason to deny you the essence of
the material and so I am giving you the full list to date.
I trust this list and HCOB restore some stability.
I hope that any failures you may have had due to alter-ised materials
will be spotted by you. And that you will be able to apply some of these
right now and get the full materials later.
I like results, you like results. And the following may include some of
the reasons you may have had a hard time with some sessions.
I am sorry for that. I have come back on tech lines especially to
correct it, and have spent seven months spotting areas where there has been
trouble or failures, evaluating them and discovering the alter-is of
original materials and issues. In many cases the alter-is sure was hidden.
This completes 7 months of search for tech outnesses.
Here is the list.
A: PTS HANDLING
The first shock (which actually began this current search for out tech
issues) was the discovery that PTS conditions were going unhandled across
the world and had been for some time.
"PTS" means Potential Trouble Source and means the person is affected
adversely by a suppressive in his life. A PTS person can be a lot of
trouble to himself and to others. The condition is not too difficult to
handle and to find that all the tech of handling it was in disuse explained
why there had been a lot of trouble and upset on various lines.
After a great deal of search, it was found that PTS handling and
another rundown (The Vital Information Rundown) had been restricted only to
Expanded Dianetics. Thus one would find on pcs' programs that they were
supposed to go all the way through Dianetics and their grades before their
PTS condition was handled. In actual fact a person who is PTS cannot be
audited on anything else until the PTSness has been straightened out. This
was operating as an effective barrier to cases.
Fortunately, the Technical Bulletin Volumes were not quite off the press
and this one was caught with HCOB 27 July 1976 which will be found on page
428 of Volume VIII.
The first thing you do for a pc in any grade or without grades is
handle his PTSness.
As long as the subject was hot I decided to look further into it to
make sure that the actual tech was still available and to get a pilot done
to verify its use in actual practice since few had had any PTS handling for
a couple of years.
I initiated a pilot project and it was well executed by CS-5.
The results of this project are found in HCOB 20 Oct 1976.
The outcome of this further research as contained in that HCOB was that
the person, for full handling, should be gotten through his PTSness and
then should study the complete pack of PTS/SP Checksheet, BPL 31 May 71RC,
so that he knows the full mechanics that had been wrecking his life. This
is contained in HCO PL of 20 Oct 1976.
While the above named checksheet is quite adequate, a project is now in
progress to collect up all original LRH Case Supervisor notes (C/Ses) and
handwritten materials on PTSness so that additional issues may be brought
out and the checksheet extended. The reason for this is that there is a
sector of non-audited handling of PTSness which has never been fully
released. This comes under the heading of additional material and the
existing PTS material is not only workable but is vital.
So this scene was rounded up and PTSness is again being handled
successfully over the world.
As an additional note, a cassette is now being made for general
distribution and sale which will soon be released so that PTS people can
get one and send it or play it to persons antagonistic to their leading a
better life.
B: ORG DELIVERY
No auditing is a technical situation. The ability to procure auditing
has a considerable bearing on people's case progress-naturally.
It was found that some organizations were slow in delivery and were
backlogging which tends to create a no auditing situation amongst pcs.
To remedy this backlog, the Technical Secretary of every org was given
a new statistic, "VALUE OF SERVICES DELIVERED." This gives an index of the
delivery of the org and brings backlogs into view and will serve as a means
of alleviating a no auditing situation in the field where it exists as it
calls the fact spectacularly to the attention of all management, local and
international. This is HCO PL 12 Nov. 76.
Along with this another situation came to view which again was a matter
of other people writing HCOBs.
The Director of Processing had been given in HCOB 16 June 1972R a
statistic which encouraged him to simply route pcs out of the org once they
had completed a small part of their processing.
Accordingly the statistic of the Director of Processing in an org was
revised in HCOB 16 June 1972RA to "the number of pcs routed back into the
lines."
The Director of Tech Services was given a stat of getting actions
completed on pcs.
With these two stats operating, one after the other, a no auditing
situation in an area is further alleviated.
People do not sufficiently consider no auditing as the most basic
failure of cases. It seems so "of course" that it gets entirely overlooked
yet it can cause a great deal of trouble.
C: HSDC RE-DO
The first inkling that the Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course curriculum
had gone adrift was noticing that two key drills had been omitted and even
cancelled by others even though they were vital to an auditor's skill in
handling a Dianetic session.
These drills were Dianetic Training Drills 101, 102, 103 and 104. These
have to do with student auditors remembering their commands in session,
making him practiced in using commands while handling his meter and admin,
training him to use the right command in the right place according to what
the pc does and finally training him to use commands and handle the session
in spite of any and all distractions or reactions from a pc. Obviously if a
Dianetic auditor cannot do these things he cannot run a Dianetic session.
These drills now have been emphatically reinstated in HCOB 19 July
1969R reissued 9 Dec 1976; they are for use in all Dianetic training.
Looking into this further, I found that there was a new unauthorized
Dianetics Course which supposedly was based on Dianetics Today being issued
which would be a sort of a competitive course to an HSDC. In following this
further it was found that even the most fundamental formats of the HSDC
which I personally developed and piloted had been grossly alter-ised, that
a number of persons had been writing HCOBs on the subject, and that the
format had been lost.
The original HSDC is being gathered together at this time with all
instructions, C/Ses and drills in the pattern and format which was
originally developed and which DID make GREAT auditors. So you can expect a
considerable resurgence in the quality of Dianetic auditing some time in
the future.
At the same time, a new course, which makes a senior Dianetic auditor,
is being put together which is a post-graduate step after a person has
become an HSDC. This will take in all the materials found in Dianetics
Today and should cover areas of special Dianetic application.
D: ROCK SLAMS
A rock slam (R/S) is defined as "a crazy irregular slashing motion of
the needle."
This particular meter reaction was found to be relatively unknown to
auditors on an examination I made of some worksheets. They were calling
dirty needles, dirty reads, rocket reads, body motion and even ticks as
"R/Ses." They were also missing real R/Ses.
As the R/S is probably the single most important and dangerous read on
the meter, clarifications of this were in order.
Accordingly I wrote HCOB 10 Aug 1976, "R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN" and
caused to be written from my notes HCOB 1 Nov 1974R, "ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK
SLAMMERS."
For a pc to be branded as an R/Ser is a very serious thing. Also for a
real R/Ser to be overlooked by an auditor is a catastrophe both to the pc
and to those around that particular person.
Therefore, this is very dangerous ground to have wrong.
These issues will help to clarify that.
At the same time I'm currently at work on a video tape which will be
available in Academies some time in the future, which gives all meter
reads.
Meanwhile, don't make any mistakes on R/Ses. Read those bulletins.
Another confusion in this sector was how to define and identify a "List
1 R/Ser."
All characteristics given in a list issued as HCOB 1 Nov 74 and signed
by another with my name were stated to have to be present before a person
was a "List 1 R/Ser." The incorrect HCOB is on page 344 Vol VIII of the
HCOB Volumes and will be corrected in later editions.
"List 1" refers to Scientology related terminals as found on page 57 of
The Book Of E-Meter Drills.
The additional characteristics on this list only help to look for a
List 1 R/S. I issued HCOB 1 Nov 1974R revised 30 Dec 1976 which now
corrects this error.
A List 1 R/Ser is simply one who R/Ses on List 1.
E: SEC CHECKING AND INTEGRITY PROCESSING
Following down the trail of auditors missing R/Ses, it was found that
Sec Checking had become a nearly lost art.
Sec Checking means, unfortunately, "Security Checking." That it was so
misnamed in its origins obscures the fact that Confessionals have been part
and parcel of religion nearly as long as religion has existed.
In actual fact the meter simply gets a pastor or minister over the very
dangerous situation of missing a withhold on his parishioner. A person with
a missed withhold can become very upset with the person who misses it; the
meter, properly operated, makes sure that none are missed.
In an effort to get around what was thought to be a public relations
scene, the name "Security Checking" was changed to "Integrity Processing."
This was also a PR error because the actual truth of the matter is it
originated as "Confessional" and should have simply been changed back to
"handling of confessions."
This administrative demand of name alteration threw the original issues
on "Sec Checking" into disuse.
Additionally "Integrity Processing" did not include all the tech of Sec
Checking. And some even thought they were different subjects!
The loss of Sec Checking, more properly called Confessionals, and the
failure to use a meter to verify withholds resulted in many student blows
(dropouts) and has permitted the continuance of a great deal of natter and
upset which are simply the result of missing withholds on people.
When you realize that a lot of the trouble of the Roman Catholic Church
probably arose through not having a meter to verify the completeness of
Confessionals, you can see what the loss of Sec Checking would do to our
own churches and organizations. In other words, we were about to repeat
history!
All this original "Sec Checking," properly Confessional, tech is being
rounded up again and will be issued in checksheet form and there will be
courses in "The Handling of Confessionals." But even before you receive
these, you should resume the use of
this metered tech as it will save you having people "mad at you" simply
because you have missed withholds on them.
It is highly self-protective both from the viewpoint of the auditor and
the organization to have the proper metered handling of Confessionals fully
in.
BTB 31 Aug 1972RA "HCO CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE" clarified the matter but
this bulletin was on a very limited distribution and is not known. It
contains the tech I developed on Sec Checking in the autumn of '72.
There should be no further confusion in this matter. "Sec Checking,"
"Integrity Processing" and "Confessionals" are all the exact same procedure
and any materials on these subjects is interchangeable under these titles.
The materials when all recollected and consolidated and reissued will
be under the title of "Confessionals." But even before that reaches you,
you had better determine to become an expert in it, since an auditor's
inability to handle this is a fast route to "how to win enemies and wrongly
influence people."
F: EXPANDED DIANETICS OVERHAUL
Expanded Dianetics began in development in 1970. It is a very fully
developed subject. However, for some reason or another, the total materials
of Expanded Dianetics were never packaged and exported even when it was
reported that they had been. Thus auditors who have been trained as
Expanded Dianetics auditors had been denied considerable key materials and
have even lost the reason for Expanded Dianetics.
Contributing to this was the removal of "Sec Checking" (Confessionals)
materials from the Expanded Dianetics Course to make up the "Integrity
Processing Rundown." Thus the course was stripped even further, for an
Expanded Dianetics auditor has to be very expert in the handling of
Confessionals.
The actual extent of Expanded Dianetics can be described as follows:
"Ex Dn consists of all the work I did on psychos and very difficult cases
from 1970 forward, my C/Ses, case histories, any tape lectures or notes,
which includes as well all data known to date on Confessionals, and all
data on PTSes. The product of the course is an auditor who can handle
psychos, R/Sers and any person's evil intentions as well as any PTSes."
That would be the full extent and skill of an Expanded Dianetics
auditor. There is considerable data connected with the subject and it is
the only data, proven, workable data, Man has on the subject of neurosis
and psychosis, and is the first breakthrough made in this field as to its
actual cause. This also embraces criminality.
While we are very far from being in the business of handling psychos,
not all psychos are in institutions or classified as psychos in this
society. Furthermore PTS persons become PTS to people who are usually
psycho.
Thus this whole scope and breadth of Expanded Dianetics has to be and
is being recompiled and issued.
Furthermore the position of Expanded Dianetics on the Grade and Class
Chart was muddied up. Actually Expanded Dianetics can be given after a Drug
Rundown, after Standard Dianetics, after Scientology grades, after Power,
after OT III and at any point upwards after completion of Grade OT III.
A PTS Rundown can be given without regard to whether the person had had
Expanded Dianetics or not. A PTS Rundown can be given anywhere and better
had be.
An auditor is trained on Expanded Dianetics after he has become an
HSDC, a Class IV auditor.
An auditor does not have to be an Expanded Dianetics auditor in order to
deliver a PTS Rundown. All he has to do is complete the PTS Checksheet and
should be a Class IV in order to audit it. There are even some portions of
the PTS Checksheet, particularly as it would be revised, which can be
delivered by a person who is not trained as an auditor at all, but this
would be non-audited handling which consists mainly of coaching the person
as to how to handle his scene.
The complete Expanded Dianetics tech is, as I have said, being
recompiled, issued and gotten back in.
G: WORD CLEARING
Having discovered an executive who had "been word cleared" by a "Word
Clearer" but who then required more than 4 1/2 hours to clear the first two
pages of the same material when handled by a higher classed auditor, I
investigated the extent of Word Clearing training and use being out.
A study of the Word Clearing Series was ordered and it was found that
there was little concentration on metering and TRs.
These seem to have been slighted because Word Clearing starts with the
phrase "I am not auditing you" and this apparently has been taken to mean
that one didn't have to know his meter and TRs in order to word clear. HCOB
10 January 1977, Word Clearing Series 55, " HOW TO WIN WITH WORD CLEARING"
is a result of this investigation and should be given particular
importance.
Another factor was spotted and is handled in Board Technical Bulletin
12 January 1977 Revised 16 January 1977, which was issued as a result of my
having found that Word Clearers had a wrong stat. The stat of Well Done
Auditing Hours would not apply to a Word Clearer. Their stat is now "Number
of Misunderstood Words honestly found and fully handled in applicable
materials."
Another action is found in HCO Policy Letter 10 January 1977, "ETHICS
AND WORD CLEARING," wherein "Any Word Clearer who word cleared materials on
which misunderstoods have been found at a later date shall be summoned to a
Court of Ethics."
The phrase "I am not auditing you" does not excuse ignorance on the
Word Clearer's part of a meter or a poor command of TRs. Of course this
must also include his knowledge of Word Clearing tech. His TRs and metering
must be excellent.
The marvelous wins that can be gotten with Word Clearing had been lost
and with this should now be recovered.
H: F/N TA POSITION
The subject of missing F/Ns (floating needles) on pcs is very important
as a pc who has had an F/N missed becomes overrun and can be very upset and
his case can even be stalled.
The first instance I ran into of this (some years ago) had to do with
the sensitivity setting on the meter. Most auditors apparently simply would
set a sensitivity knob on 5 and leave it there, regardless of how the pc
advanced and regardless of who they were auditing. This would give them
extremely wide F/Ns which would hit the pin, on one or both sides, and hang
up as they were unable to keep the needle on "set." The correct way to go
about this is to always set the sensitivity knob by pc can squeeze. When
the pc squeezes the cans, the sensitivity knob should give about a third of
a dial drop, no more, no less. Only in that way can you keep a needle on
the "set" mark on the dial. Otherwise, F/Ns get missed. Some pcs have to go
up to 128 (32) which is a front face meter setting to get such a fall on a
can squeeze and I have just noted a pc who had such a wide F/N swing that
the sensitivity had to be set at 1 (32), which is about as low as the meter
can go without turning off, and even then this pc got a half a dial can
squeeze
fall and so had to be watched very carefully so that F/Ns were not missed.
I mention this in case it has dropped out again.
The current discovery which just dropped with a clang was that in one
interneship, an interne supervisor was using verbal tech which had then
spread all over the world to the effect that you MUST NOT call an F/N an
F/N unless it were between 2 and 3 on the tone arm dial, and that any F/N
type motion which occurred with the TA above 3 or below 2 could not
possibly be called an F/N. This was his own craziness and he wished it off
with a bunch of verbal tech on an awful lot of auditors and caused an
enormous amount of pcs subsequently to be very unhappy.
The result and remedy of this is contained in HCOB 10 December 1976,
which is marked Urgent and Important. It is marked that way because
apparently there are very few pcs around right now who haven't had F/Ns
missed on them.
This HCOB should be very carefully studied. However, in brief, the
correct procedure for out of range (above 3 or below 2) F/Ns is:
1. Look at the pc's indicators,
2. Call the F/N regardless of its range, if the indicators are
alright,
3. Mark down the actual TA position when the F/N is indicated,
4. Handle the false TA at the earliest opportunity when it will
not intrude into the current cycle of auditing,
5. On any pc you suspect has had his F/Ns disregarded because of
false TA, you C/S for and get run a repair and rehab of points in
his auditing when F/Ns were missed on him.
In other words, have your sensitivity correct and when an F/N occurs
outside of the range between 2 and 3, know that it is an F/N by the needle
motion and by the pc s indicators and call it, indicate it and put it down
on the worksheet. Note the actual TA position. Then, before the next
session or after you have finished a crucial cycle of auditing on the pc,
in the next several sessions, go into the whole subject of his false TA and
handle it.
Missing an F/N is very cruel on a pc because it invalidates his having
released the charge on the subject on which he is being audited and tends
to tell him that he is not better even though he feels better. There is one
historic case of an auditor having gotten an F/N in the first ten minutes
of auditing and then, because it occurred slightly above 3, auditing the pc
for an additional three hours with the TA climbing, the pc unhappy and no
results being obtained from the processing. This sort of thing is pretty
gruesome.
Verbal tech is no substitute for HCOBs.
I: FALSE TA
Having written the HCOB just above telling auditors that they call the
F/N regardless of where it was, providing the pc's indicators were OK and
then handle the TA on the pc, I found that issues on correcting false TA
had been messed up.
In both HCOB 29 Feb 1972R Revised 23 Nov 1973 and its successor HCOB 29
Feb 1972RA Revised 23 Apr 1975, careless reading could imply that the False
TA Checklist was audited on the pc like any other prepared list. In other
words this idiocy set in that the meter reads were going to be used to
divine whether or not the meter knew whether or not the pc was responding
properly. The list actually, is a list of things the auditor manually,
mechanically checks on the pc. He does not consult reads and he does not
assess anything on the pc; he simply personally does a checklist and
this was the checklist. It was not assessed to find a reading item.
Therefore an auditor trying to correct false TA and get the TA to read
between 2 and 3 by using a meter to assess the list would never find out
what was going on and would be unable to get the meter into that position.
Accordingly, HCOB 13 Jan 1977 was directed to be written, and the full
and entire checklist to be done by the auditor on the pc recompiled and
updated. It is being issued as HCOB 21 Jan 1977.
Therefore it will now be very easy for an auditor to correct the false
TA on a pc and he will be able to get the meter tone arm properly between 2
and 3.
You know, don't you, that a TA goes up more than a division when you
start using a one-hand electrode? This is not a "false TA" that you can
correct. Solo auditors using just one hand have their TAs riding around 3.7
and 4.5 on the tone arm. This is not a case of false TA, it is always
checked by using both hands on the cans at the start and end of session.
But here again false TA can occur if the hands are too dry or too wet or
the can size is wrong.
You shouldn't have very much trouble with this. Actually it's a very
simple matter, but the outnesses in this sector have caused an awful lot of
trouble and I was very happy to be able to find the erroneous issues and
get it straight for you.
A video which will eventually become available in Academies will also
cover false TA handling.
J: INCOMPLETE AUDITING FOLDERS
For some time Word Clearers, Sec Checkers, Ethics Officers and Cramming
Officers have neglected to include their worksheets in the pc's actual
folder.
This causes considerable difficulty for a Case Supervisor since the
person may have wrong lists in "Why Finding," may have R/Sed on a Sec
Check, may have had incomplete or incorrect Word Clearing and other tech
outnesses in between regular sessions. Where these folder omissions occur
an FESer (Folder Error Summary maker) is often prevented from finding where
the case went wrong.
Then there is the matter of no folders at all. Somebody has lost them
or mislaid them, yet some auditor needs them desperately to find out lists
or to actually verify grades attained. The preservation and availability of
auditing folders to the next auditor or a Case Supervisor years up the
track is of very great importance.
Accordingly HCO PL 28 Oct 1976 and HCOB 28 Oct 1976, C/S Series 98
(which are both the same equal texts) were written by me to remedy these
very dangerous tech outnesses.
K: FALSIFYING AUDITOR REPORTS
Along with missing reports it was found that there had been some
difficult situations created by the falsification of auditing reports.
From the small matter of saying that the TA was at 3.0 when actually is
at 4.5 when the F/N occurred (thus obscuring the fact that false TA had to
be handled), up to the very large crime of faking the fact that certain
processes had been run when they had not just to get a completion or a
bonus and up to falsifying the data or text which the pc gave, this matter
of false Auditor Reports can cause enormous amounts of trouble.
The consequences and detection of the falsification of auditing reports
is now contained in HCO Policy Letter 26 Oct 1976 Issue 1, the same text
issued as HCOB 26 Oct 1976 Issue 1, C/S Series 97. This makes even the
minor falsification of an auditing
report a matter of Comm Ev and, if the crime is proven beyond reasonable
doubt, there can result a cancellation of all certificates and awards, a
declare and an expulsion order.
If you think this is unnecessarily harsh, think of the poor pc.
L: CHECKLIST FOR FESers
It can happen that a pc is taken up into new grades without having
completed earlier, more basic grades and without being set up for the later
grade. This can result in somebody going through several grades just to
cure a mild somatic or a PTP. It can also throw a pc in over his head.
For a long time there have been checklists showing the requirements for
most major grades.
A recent instance of a pc going all the way through to OT 111 who had
not completed anything caused me to investigate the reasons behind this.
It was discovered that very few Case Supervisors ever check a folder to
find out if the pc has actually made the grades lower than the one that he
is about to be put on.
A further check showed that few C/Ses ever looked up the earlier
history of the case and this resulted in pcs being put up through levels
for which they have not been set up and past levels they have not made.
A further investigation showed that these checklists were not in
existence for every grade and action.
It became obvious that the people who should be using these checklists
would be the Folder Error Summary auditors. These FESers are the only ones
who thoroughly go through the folders and Case Supervisors depend on them.
Thus if the FESer is not required to verify whether the pc has properly
attained the level he is about to go onto and if he has been set up for the
level, then nobody is going to check this over and a great many pcs are
going to be audited on skipped gradients without set-ups and will get into
difficulty.
I have ordered that checklists be made up for FESers to use for each
major grade so that they can check off the requisites for each grade and
thus handle this out gradient situation. These checklists are being worked
on at this time and will be issued in the near future.
In the meantime it is the duty of the FESer to indicate whether or not
the pc has actually reached each grade to which he has attested and whether
or not he is properly set up for the grade he is about to be embarked upon.
M: AUDITOR RECOVERY
It can happen here and there that an auditor who has been auditing
eases off and ceases to audit.
There are various reasons for this. One of the common ones is a skipped
gradient in his training. Another one is misunderstood words and the
commonest one is overts of omission or commission on the subject of
auditing or pcs which have not been handled.
An LRH ED 176RB INT originally issued on 24 April 1972 was
unfortunately revised 2 or 3 times by other people and lost its punch.
I reworked this and restored it to its earlier form on 7 Nov 1976 and
this is available as LRH ED 176RB INT. The investigation and reissue being
assisted by CS-7.
It is available in this form and in the near future will be issued as an
HCOB.
N: STUDY TECH
During an investigation of pricing I discovered that "The Student Hat"
had disappeared from use and in its place had been put an optional Basic
Study Manual. The fact is that the Basic Study Manual has its own uses and
is very valuable but it does not begin to replace The Student Hat.
This meant actually that study tech had more or less disappeared in
Academies and was not in general use.
The actions taken were to make The Student Hat mandatory on a one-time
basis before the next major course a person took and to include it free as
a bonus to the person taking that course.
The Student Hat has been restored in totality as a requisite for study
tech. This will make study much more positive and much faster.
The Basic Study Manual was put forward sometime ago as a means of
getting staffs hatted on their hat materials and as a fast method of
getting people reading the materials of their posts. I suppose that is how
it drifted over onto major courses, where it has no business.
Thus The Student Hat is back full force and if there are any blown
students around you should realize that the reason for their blow is either
lack of study tech or undisclosed overts. The thing to do is to get them
back and push them through The Student Hat so they can win at their studies
and get their overts off so they can look their fellow man in the eye.
There has been another training outness found which I will mention in
passing. In some interneships the entire Qual staff of the org has been
employed in checking out students. Actually such checkouts are done by the
students themselves, on each other where starrates are required in
interneships.
It has also been found that twinning on theory occasionally creeps back
in. People have not noticed that twinning on theory, meaning two students
always study together, went out many years ago and has been cancelled. It
makes a noisy classroom and prevents students from getting through their
courses rapidly. Twinning on theory sets up too many difficulties such as
the loss of one's twin by reason of graduation or transfer, being sent to
Cramming, an odd number of people on the course so that one is without a
twin and so on.
Practical is another matter. In practical drilling is done on the twin
basis.
The theory and practical are never in the same room; they must be in
different rooms. The theory room must be very, very quiet where a student
can concentrate and the practical room must be so situated as to allow
students to make noise. If any Academy has a noisy theory classroom or if
the Academy is difficult to study in, this is probably what is in
violation: probably the twinning is going on in theory or the theory rooms
are noisy. Only a practical room can be made noisy.
The two issues (putting twinning in on theory) have now been revised
and cancelled. They are HCOB 26 Nov 71, Tape Course Series 10, W/Cing
Series 26 "HANDLING MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS ON TAPE RECORDED MATERIALS," which
has been revised and cancelled by BTB 26 Nov 71RA (Tape Course Series 8,
W/C Series 26RA) of same title (Tech Volume IX, page 440). HCOB 7 Feb 72
Issue 11, W/Cing Series 31, "METHOD 3 WORD CLEARING BY THE STUDENT'S TWIN"
has been revised and cancelled by BTB 7 Feb 1972RA Issue II, W/Cing Series
31RA "METHOD 3 WORD CLEARING" (Tech Volume IX, page 448).
The main point is you want a quiet and orderly theory training room and put
the noisy demo and practical actions elsewhere. And also don't hang up
people on theory because they lose their twins. Practical twins are highly
interchangeable.
O: PROFESSIONAL RATES
It was found in some cases that pcs would enroll on courses and then
never take them just so they could have professional rates in their
auditing.
This not only denied them the training they paid for but it was also
making organizations short of auditors.
Accordingly HCO PL 13 Nov 1976 was issued which clarified "professional
rates" which makes it necessary for an auditor to be fully classed in the
class of that org from which he is seeking service in order to qualify for
a 50% professional discount in auditing. This does not apply to his family.
What's the matter with becoming an auditor? There are 2 or 3 billion
pcs out there and only a few of us auditors. Have a heart and also lend a
hand. Furthermore how do you know what good auditing is unless you're
trained?
P: SENIOR CASE SUPERVISOR LINE
It was recently found that the Senior Case Supervisor, in at least one
large org. spent most of his time giving advice to executives on personnel
case requirements for the crew! This is so far from the duties of a Snr C/S
that the HCO PL outlining their duties has been rewritten and has become
HCO PL of 26 Sept 1974R, revised and reissued 21 Jan 1977, which tells a
Snr C/S in effect to look after the tech quality in his org.
There is another modification on Snr Case Supervisors. Previously it
was necessary for someone to go to a distant org and become a Class VIII
before he could be qualified as the Snr Case Supervisor of an org. This is
no longer necessary. HCO PL 24 Oct 76 Issue III modifies these requirements
so that a Snr Case Supervisor can be trained by his local org.
In this same Policy Letter the award of Dean of Technology is outlined.
These would be gold certificate Case Supervisors. They are Saint Hill
Special Briefing Course Class VIII Course auditors who have attained the
case level to the class of his org and has a uniform record of case
supervision.
This general overhaul of the Snr Case Supervisor and his lines and
duties is in effort to correct out tech and establish excellent tech in any
org and its area.
Q: INTERNESHIPS
It was found that very few interneships were now being taught and an
investigation undertaken by the Action Aide Flag Bureau at my orders,
finally uncovered that interneship checksheets had been added to and added
to and stirred about until they had become checksheets within checksheets,
thus making interneships interminable.
As a result of this, a special mission was put on the job of reforming
interneship checksheets.
These checksheets have now been issued and exist for every level as
Board Policy Letters issued from 10 Nov 76 up through BPL 25 Nov 76 Issue
1. They have been greatly simplified and have made interneships into very
worthwhile actions.
These new simplified interneship checksheets are in full use at this
time.
Along with this interneship program, HCO Policy Letter of 25 Oct 1976 has
been issued which requires that all past provisional certificates which
have not been validated by an interneship and which are one year or more
old from the date of course completion are cancelled. It states such
students should be notified and should be enrolled on the interneship for
the class. If a properly conducted interneship is satisfactorily completed,
their permanent certificate may be reissued.
All of this is in an effort to get auditors straightened out, getting
wins and making them really proficient and professional in all areas of the
world.
R: ILLEGAL PCs
It has occasionally happened that an auditor has had pushed off on him
by persuasion or pressure, cases who should not have been accepted by the
org.
HCOB 6 Dec 1976 also HCO PL 6 Dec 76 (identical texts), make this a
High Crime.
Certain types of cases may not therefore be forced off on auditors by
anyone, and anyone seeking to force such a pc upon an auditor against
policy, is actionable by a Committee of Evidence.
S: EXPANDED GRADES BEING REDONE
It has been found that some processes were left out of Expanded Grades
0 to IV and that in some cases these grades had been quickied. Therefore,
all Expanded Grades checklists are being reissued and will contain more
extensive processes.
Until you have the new Expanded Grades checklists, the ones you are
using are still OK.
T: REPAIR LIST REVISED
Through an oversight, an incomplete Board Technical Bulletin 11 Aug
1972RA revised 18 Dec 1974, C/S Series 83RA, was included on page 230 of
Volume X of the HCOB Volumes.
A far more extensive write-up, LRH ED 257 INT of 1 Dec 1974, existed
which gave much more data and many more prepared lists as repair tools for
the auditor.
The LRH ED has now been issued as HCOB of 24 Oct 1976 C/S Series 96
"DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS."
Although this issue has been updated to some degree, there are still
one or two repair lists omitted. Therefore, this is about to be issued
again as C/S Series 96R, which will include the additional and valuable
lists.
U: ROUTING FORMS AND STAFF STATUSES
It has been found that Staff Status 0, 1 & 11, Sea Org Products 0, 1 &
11 and Org Routing Forms were not in full agreement with one another.
This is taking a lot of straightening out and is very much in need of
it, as in one major org it was found to be impossible for a new staff
member to route onto post!
This is under full coordination rewrite and will be issued in the near
future.
V: STAFF SECTION OFFICER
I have for some time been concerned about the lack of care some orgs had
been giving their own staff members.
As a result HCO PL 22 May 1976 was issued which established the post of
Staff Section Officer, who was responsible for the training and the
processing of staff members.
To further enforce this, the Qual Divisions of orgs were given a new
Gross Divisional Statistic in HCO PL of 4 Nov 1976. This gave the dominant
Qual Divisional Statistic as "Fully qualified and trained staff members in
the org. cumulative."
Additionally, in HCO PL of 10 Nov 1976 certain staff courses were made
mandatory in orgs.
So as not to neglect staff cases, even when auditors were absent, a
whole new project has been released concerning "co-audits."
This is actually a recovery of lost tech. There used to be co-audits,
very successful ones, and they had their own special technology.
A tech mission to the UK, reassembled the tech and got staff co-audits
going with rave wins.
All of this technology and how it is done, has been issued as Board
Technical Bulletins dated around early December 1976 under the title of "Co-
audit Series."
Both the co-audit tech and Group Processing fell under the category of
lost tech, but have been restored, polished up and are being issued for
full use.
W: UNISSUED RUNDOWNS
It came to my attention in July of '76 that about 5 years worth of my
developments on Flag had never been fully packaged up or issued for use.
The reason for this is, that the Tech Compilations Units which had
previously worked on this were disbanded in 1972 by the then CS-4 and was
not reestablished.
Several years worth of intensive research and development are therefore
backlogged in being issued.
Only one of these areas of development is restricted to Flag, as it is
the famous "L" series of rundowns which require such technical accuracy
that they can only be audited by a Class XII.
The rest of the rundowns, however, are fully capable of being fully
compiled from the notes, lectures, issues and my case supervision notes and
released.
Including the repackaging necessary for the HSDC, Expanded Dianetics
and reissue of Expanded Grades, all mentioned above, there were 9 rundowns
in all which were never compiled or exported.
For that matter, the much earlier Class Vial Course was added to and
varied and it also is being repackaged in its original form and exported
and is now being taught again in Advanced Orgs.
The remaining rundowns are being worked on for issue as never having
seen the light of day in Class IV, Saint Hill and Advanced Orgs.
All this is now being done. So soon this important new tech will appear
and be available in orgs.
X: ADVANCED GRADES
For a number of years people have wondered when OT VIII would be
released.
Well, to tell you the honest truth, OT VIII has been in existence all
those several years, and to it has been added a very large number of OT
grades. None of them have been issued. Notes for all these grades are in
existence.
What I have been waiting for is 2 or 3 months of free time to go over
these materials and write them up and make them available through Advanced
Organizations.
Now I will make a bargain with you. If you get all the tech
straightened out and the orgs and flaps and emergencies off my lines and
get your training in and your Word Clearing in and everything flying and
this civilization even more thoroughly pointed in a civilized direction,
you will buy me those 3 months' worth of time so I will be able to afford
the time to write up all these Advanced Levels I have researched. Do your
job well and buy me these three months.
Is it a bargain?
LRH:act.lf.nt L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1977 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 JANUARY 1977
Corrected & Reissued
Remimeo 20 MARCH 1977
Tech & Qual (Correction in this type style)
All Levels
All Auditors
All Tech Checksheets
FOOTPLATES USE FORBIDDEN
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 71R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 71RA FALSE TA ADDITION
HCOB 15 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
HCOB 18 Feb 72R FALSE TA ADDITION 3
HCOB 24 Jan 73 Issue II
HCOB 23 Nov 73RA DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA
HCOB 23 Apr 75R VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA
HCOB 13 Jan 77R HANDLING A FALSE TA
HCOB 21 Jan 77R FALSE TA CHECKLIST
The use of footplates is forbidden. A recent dispatch to myself from
LRH quotes him, "I tested footplates and they don't read! Not on the bank."
The above issues cover how to handle a false TA. Use them to resolve TA
problems not footplates.
Paulette Ausley
As ordered by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
BDCS:
LRH:PA:nt.dr for the
Copyright � 1977 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
by L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JANUARY 1977
CANCELLED 5 DECEMBER 1977
Gen non-remimeo
AUDITOR RECOVERY
HCO B 27 Jan 77 AUDITOR RECOVERY is CANCELLED.
It was based upon LRH ED 176RB INT AUDITOR RECOVERY which was written
by a terminal other than LRH and has since been cancelled, with the
original LRH ED 176 INT AUDITOR RECOVERY by Ron restored.
LRH ED 176 INT AUDITOR RECOVERY is the issue to be used in doing an
Auditor Recovery Program.
Lt. (jg) S. Hubbard
AVU BPL Appeal Line
Authorized by AVU
Approved by
LRH Pers Comm
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:KU:AH:SH:kjm
Copyright � 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Since HCOB 27 Jan 77, Auditor Recovery is cancelled and was not written
by LRH, it does not appear in this volume. See LRH ED 176 INT, Auditor
Recovery on page 205 of this volume.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JANUARY 1977
Remimeo CORRECTED 19 MARCH 1977
(Correction in this type style)
FALSE TA DATA
There have been several recent revisions of False TA issues. This issue
will just clearly list out all the issues and their dates so there is an
easy reference for data on false TA handling.
HCOB 24 Oct 1971R FALSE TA
HCOB 12 Nov 1971RA FALSE TA ADDITION
HCOB 15 Feb 1972R FALSE TA ADDITION 2
HCOB 18 Feb 1972R FALSE TA ADDITION 3
HCOB 24 Jan 1973 Issue II
HCOB 23 Nov 1973RA DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE A FALSE TA
HCOB 23 Apr 1975R VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA
HCOB 10 Dec 1976 F/N AND TA POSITION
HCOB 13 Jan 1977 FALSE TA HANDLING
HCOB 21 Jan 1977 FALSE TA CHECKLIST
The above are the issues that deal with false TA.
Paulette Ausley
By order of
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:PA:nt
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 FEBRUARY 1977
(Also published as HCO PL, same date.)
Remimeo
EDs. COs
HESes. S/Cs
HCOs
HASes
Sec Checkers C/S Series 100
Case Supervisors
Staff Section Officers
JOKERS AND DEGRADERS
It is an old principle that people who do not understand something
occasionally make fun of it.
A recent investigation however into the backgrounds and case condition
of a small handful of people who were joking about their posts and those
around them showed a somewhat more sinister scene.
Each of these persons fell into one or more of the following
categories:
1. Were rock slammers. (Some List 1.)
2. Were institutional type cases.
3. Were "NCG" (meaning no case gain) (the only cause of which is
continuous present time overts).
4. Were severely PTS (Potential Trouble Source) (connected to rock
slammers).
It might be supposed that misunderstood word phenomena could also be
part of this. The rebellious student in universities is usually handled by
clearing up his misunderstoods or curing his hopelessness for his future.
However, the investigation did not find that any of these jokers or
degraders were acting that way solely because of misunderstood words, but
the possibility cannot be ruled out.
The four categories above were, however, fully verified.
All the persons investigated were found to be the subject of declining
statistics, both having them and causing them. Their areas were
enturbulated. At least one of the jokers was physically driving basic
course students out of an org.
In some cultural areas, wit and humor are looked upon as a healthy
release. However, in the case of orgs, this was not found to be the case.
Intentional destruction of the org or fellow staff members was the direct
purpose.
Therefore all executives, HCO personnel and Case Supervisors as well as
Qual personnel and Staff Section Officers have a valuable indicator. Where
they have a joker or degrader on their hands they also have one or more of
the above four conditions in that person.
This opens the door to handling such people.
Properly assigned and then fully done conditions are the correct ethics
handlings.
Correctly done Expanded Dianetics, which includes Confessionals and
fully done PTS handlings are the case remedies.
Where ethics tech itself is not known or neglected and where there are no
HCOs one can, of course, not expect the matter to be handled. And this
would be too bad because the case gain and life improvement available in
proper ethics handlings, when fully followed through, can be quite
miraculous.
Where rock slammers have been undermining the tech and it is not fully
known or used or is altered into unworkability one cannot expect
Confessionals to be properly done or Expanded Dianetics to be known and
properly applied.
The joker is advertising his symptoms. He is also advertising an area
of the org where there is enturbulation and down statistics as well as
staff members being victimized.
Therefore this is an administrative and technical indicator which
cannot be overlooked and should be followed up.
Spotted, investigated and handled, this can be the beginning of an
upward spiral for an organization.
Where someone is driving ethics out, tech is not likely to go in. You
have to get in ethics and tech before you can begin to get in admin.
The next time you, as an executive, wonder why you are working so hard,
look for the joker in the deck.
Humor is one thing. Destroyed orgs and human beings are quite something
else.
It is our business to get the show on the road and get the job done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: If
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 FEBRUARY 1977R
REVISED 20 FEBRUARY 1977
Remimeo (Revision in this type sty/e)
Tr & Serv Aide
Pubs Orgs IMPORTANT
Course Supervisors
All Students COURSE NECESSITIES
Effective on receipt on all students who have not begun the levels
named and on all internes for the relevant class:
1. All materials on Word Clearing are added to Level Zero
checksheets.
2. All materials on Confessionals (formerly known also as Sec
Checking or Integrity Processing) are added to Grade II.
3. All materials on listing and nulling and all materials on PTS,
SP tech are added to Level IV.
4. All materials on co-audits are added to the Senior Class IV
checksheets.
Where the student has not earlier covered them or as review all the
above materials are added to the Senior Class IV checksheets.
5. All the above materials for a first time or review if earlier
covered in lower levels are added to the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course.
It has been found that some Class IV auditors who have gone through
these levels do not know these vital technologies.
Those who have done so should take their Senior Class IV in their local
org or the SHSBC at their earliest ability to do so. Failure to attain a
thorough command of the above mentioned tech as well as the previous
materials of the mentioned classes can give them loses on their preclears.
All Course Supervisors are responsible for seeing that these materials
and current improved checksheets are available to such students without
delay. The improved checksheets of this material exist and the bulk of the
materials exists in HCOB Volumes where packs are not at once available.
Nothing in this HCOB states these materials cannot be independently
studied by other persons or auditors of other or no c/ass.
This HCOB does not assign these materials to pus only at that level and
they can be done at any level at need.
Auditors at or above C/ass IV who do not know these materials and can
use them well had better do the relevant packs fast to get their tech up to
date.
Keep Scientology Working.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
BDCS:LRH:lf.nt CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 FEBRUARY 1977
CORRECTED AND REISSUED 26 FEBRUARY 1977
Remimeo (Corrected to add the word "one" in para 6, line 2.)
Expanded Dn
Checksheet
All Auditors
EXPANDED DIANETICS CASES
Those who "compiled" Expanded Dianetics materials previously chose only
the case histories of the early research cases.
These cases were not completed on Expanded Dianetics at that time.
According to the Training and Services Aide, this has given auditors
the impression that one does not complete Expanded Dianetics cases.
This conclusion is not correct. One DOES fully and completely complete
Expanded Dianetics cases!
Not included in the "Case Histories" released was the later complete
Expanded Dianetics auditing most of these cases did receive.
Therefore any impression that one does not complete Expanded Dianetics
or that one uses small bits of it mixed up with other rundowns or grades
should be amended. One DOES complete any such case.
They are often quite lengthy.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 MARCH 1977
Issue I
Remimeo
All Orgs
Confessional CANCELLATION OF
Checksheet INTEGRITY PROCESSING HCOBs
SHSBC
Several HCOBs in the Integrity Processing Series were actually
excerpted from earlier LRH HCOBs.
These excerpted versions are cancelled with this issue.
The original LRH HCOBs are listed below along with the Integrity
Processing HCOBs which are cancelled with this issue.
The consolidation of Confessional materials can be found in BTB 31 Aug
1972RB CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE.
1. HCOB 9 Dec 1974 Integrity Processing Series 6RA EFFECTIVENESS OF
OVERTS IN PROCESSING is cancelled. The data is covered in HCOB 10 July
1964 OVERTS-ORDER OF EFFECTIVENESS IN PROCESSING.
2. HCOB 13 Dec 1972R Integrity Processing Series 10R INTEGRITY QUESTIONS
MUST BE F/Ned is cancelled. The data is covered in HCOB 19 Oct 1961
SECURITY QUESTIONS MUST BE NULLED.
3. HCOB 14 Dec 1972R Integrity Processing Series 11R GENERALITIES WON'T
DO is cancelled. The data is covered in HCOB 16 Nov 1961 SEC CHECKING
GENERALITIES WON'T DO.
4. HCOB 15 Dec 1972R Integrity Processing Series 12R is cancelled. The
data is covered in HCOB 22 Feb 1962 WITHHOLDS, MISSED AND PARTIAL.
5. HCOB 16 Dec 1972 Integrity Processing Series 13 HELP THE PC is
cancelled. The material is covered in HCOB 10 May 1962 PREPCHECKING AND
SEC CHECKING.
6. HCOB 17 Dec 1972 Integrity Processing Series 14 HAVINGNESS is
cancelled. The material is covered in HCOB 11 Jan 1962 SECURITY
CHECKING TWENTY-TEN THEORY.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Training & Services Aide
LRH:JG:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 MARCH 1977
Issue II
Remimeo
Confessional
Auditors CONFESSIONAL FORMS
SHSBC
Never subtract anything from a Confessional.
The best method is to write out a predetermined series of questions, as
an additional thing, which is for that person particularly. You figure out
about what their relationship to life has been, and then you write a little
special series of questions.
It's always possible to write up an additional list. Don't make that
the only Confessional form. Give that along with a standard Confessional.
You get the idea of what kind of life your preclear has been leading,
what his professional and domestic zones are, and you adapt Confessional
questions to that and you add it to standard forms.
Compiled from
LRH Taped Lecture
"Teaching the Field
Sec Checks," SHSBC
6109C26 SH Spec 58
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Training & Services Aide
LRH:JG:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 MARCH 1977
Issue III
Remimeo
Confessional
Auditors CANCELS
Snr Cl IV BTB 21 DEC 1972 FORMULATING
SHSBC INTEGRITY PROCESSING QUESTIONS
FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS
(Compiled from LRH taped lecture "Teaching the
Field Sec Checks," SHSBC 6109C26 SH Spec 58.)
Withholds don't add up to withholds. They add up to overts, they add up
to secrecies, they add up to individuations, they add up to games
conditions, they add up to a lot more things than O/W.
Although we carelessly call them withholds, we're asking a person to
straighten out their interpersonal relationships with another terminal.
Our normal Confessional is addressed to the individual versus the
society or his family.
It's what people would consider reprehensible that makes a withhold.
In a Catholic society, not having kept Mass would be a reprehensible
action. In a non-Catholic society, nobody would think twice about it. So,
most of our Confessionals are aimed at transgressions against the mores of
the group. That is the basic center line of the Confessional.
You can have a special mores between the son and the mother, a special
mores between the husband and the wife, just as you have a special mores,
of course, between the auditor and the preclear.
It's a moral code that you are processing in one way or the other.
You are straightening out somebody on a moral code, the "Now I'm
supposed to's." They've transgressed on a series of "Now I'm supposed
to's." Having so transgressed, they are now individuated. If their
individuation is too obsessive, they snap in and become the terminal. All
of these cycles exist around the idea of the transgression against the "Now
I'm supposed to's." That is what a Confessional clears up and that is all
it clears up. It's a great deal more than a withhold.
You would go straight to a person's handling of masses and changes of
space. On lacking a clue in that direction, you would go into his most
confused motional areas (not e-motional).
This fellow has been a recluse ever since he was twenty. He has not
done anything since he was twenty. He has never been anyplace since he was
twenty. His hidden standard is he would "get about more." Could he find
himself getting about more, he would know that Scientology was working. You
find what area he was in before he was twenty. Staying in the house is a
cure for something. So you put him on an E-Meter. You can't find areas of
moving heavy masses or changes in spaces before he was twenty because he
wasn't working. It probably lies in the zone of, maybe, he was in the
service? Maybe he was in a boarding school? So all of a sudden you hit the
jackpot and you find an area of considerable activity. You're looking for
the area of considerable activity which lies prior to the difficulty. Then
you run a Confessional on that area of activity.
You trace it back to boarding school. There's one boarding school that he
absolutely detests, he suddenly remembers. That's what you do the
Confessional on.
Every question you ask has to do with this boarding school. Just add up
the factors. How many things can go on in a boarding school? How many
people are present? What is there in a boarding school? There are students,
boys, instructors, coaches, headmasters, buildings, athletic equipment, and
probably transport from there to home, etc.
Find out all the types of crimes that he might have been able to commit
against these items. You can dream up a whole form.
One of the ways of doing it is taking an existing Confessional form and
just moving it over to the zone of the school. That is not as satisfactory
as just putting down all the things he really did in this school that he is
never going to tell anybody.
It inevitably is going to be an area of tight mores. He has cut up
against those mores, so has individuated himself against the school, so he
cannot as-is any part of the track. He's trapped in that particular zone
and activity.
Any set of cut sensory perception will operate as overt bait. Forget is
a version of not know. So that any sensory perceptive cut off is an effort
not to know and you have a target.
Take everything that you've worked up to right there and now do a
Confessional on it. Eventually you'll get a "What do you know!" He's too in
the thing to see it. You can see it because you're outside of it.
You write up every noun you could possibly think of on the subject of
the zone or dynamic that he is having difficulty with and which he fails to
cognite on in any way shape or form. You can immediately assume that if he
doesn't cognite on that zone or area, that he's really pinned down and that
he has withholds from you and from the area on the subject of the area that
not even he knows.
A cognition is totally dependent upon the freedom to know. Overts and
withholds are dedicated to another thing, these are dedicated to not
knowingness. So if the person doesn't cognite, you can immediately assume
that he has a large area of not knowingness on the subject that he doesn't
even suspect. You as an outsider to his case can suspect where this fellow
is having trouble. You dream up a Confessional to match it. The formula for
making up a Confessional is just make up a list of all the items you can
think of which have anything to do with that target.
Let's say his family; he's always had family trouble. You can get this
from a pc's PTPs. If you look at the type of PTP that the pc has, you'll
know that it is a present time problem of long duration. If it adds up to
three or four times in a row of PTPs with his family, it must be a problem
of long duration. The hottest way to get rid of that particular zone is to
do a Confessional on it. Again, the way to do a Confessional, is to make a
list of all the nouns and all the doingnesses which you can think of and
just ask the person if he has overts against any of them; has he done
anything to, has he interfered with anything about, e.g. "Have you ever
interfered with schooling," "Have you ever done anything to schooling,"
"Have you ever prevented schooling."
It's little by little that this cognition will take place. It's not all
going to take place in one bang.
In the long run it will be a bang, but the bang only took place because
you took the pebbles off the top. When you've finally got the thing
uncovered-he can look at it and blow it.
This is the rule: ANY ZONE OR ACTIVITY WITH WHICH A PERSON IS HAVING
DIFFICULTY IN LIFE OR HAS HAD DIFFICULTY WITH IN LIFE IS A FRUITFUL AREA
FOR A CONFESSIONAL.
You will find out every time, he's got withholds in that zone or area.
One of the indicators of that is a present time problem. Therefore you
know it's a problem of long duration. Three problems of short duration
equals one problem of long duration. It's a good detector mechanism.
THE RULE IN CONFESSIONALS IS BREAK THE PROBLEM DOWN TO ITS MOST
FUNDAMENTAL EXPRESSION.
Then write down those nouns associated with it and those basic
doingnesses associated with the fundamental expression and then just phrase
your Confessional questions on the basis "Have you ever . . . ?" and any
other verb you want to put in. "Have you ever done anything to . . . ?"
"Have you ever prevented . . . ?"
You don't have to be fancy as the needle's going to fall every time you
come close to it.
Any area where a person is having difficulty in, he is stupid in.
Stupidity is not knowingness. This is through overts. But the overt has to
be hidden, so it must be an overt that is withheld.
So, these withholds then add up to stupidity and he of course, has
trouble.
There isn't anything complicated in it at all.
Compiled from
LRH Taped Lecture
"Teaching the Field
Sec Checks," SHSBC
6109C26 SH Spec 58
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Training & Services Aide
LRH:JG:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Circa 1965
REISSUED AS
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 1 MARCH 1977
Auditors Issue IV
Academy
Snr Class IV
SHSBC A VALID CONFESSIONAL
The following Confessional is reissued for your use.
1. Do you have anything in your possession that really belongs to us?
2. Do you illegally have any Clearing Course data?
3. Have you passed on any confidential information to anyone?
4. Have you falsely attested to the Ethics Officer?
5. Are you using Scientology unethically for your own personal profit?
6. Have you altered any Scientology data?
7. Have you misused any Scientology processes?
8. Are you in possession of confidential data you shouldn't have?
9. Are you withholding information?
10. Have you broken the Auditor's Code?
11. Have you validated a suppressive person?
12. Have you validated a suppressive group?
13. Have you altered standard technology?
14. Do you have any knowledge of an undisclosed crime against
Scientology?
15. Have you spread destructive rumours?
16. Have you claimed false qualification?
17. Have you illegally run any version of the Power Processes on anyone?
18. Have you illegally discussed the Power Processes with anyone?
19. Have you altered the Power Processes commands?
20. Have you illegally run the Power Processes on someone?
21. Has anything been missed?
22. Have you told any half-truths?
23. Have you told any untruths?
24. Do you have dishonourable intentions?
25. Do you intend abiding by policy?
26. Do you intend running the Power Processes before you are
trained on them?
27. Have you mixed the processes of Scientology with other practices?
28. Have you used Scientology data to restimulate another?
29. Has anyone got keyed-in as a result of your having discussed high
level data with them?
30. Have you overwhelmed a preclear?
31. Have you goofed and not patched up a case?
32. Do you agree with standard technology?
33. Do you intend abiding by the rules?
34. Do you intend to give the Clearing Course material to anyone?
35. Do you intend to run the Clearing Course materials on anyone?
36. Have you invalidated clearing?
37. Have you invalidated the state of Clear?
38. Are you here as an agent for someone?
39. Has something been nearly found out?
40. Have you given a false attestation?
41. Has anything been missed?
42. What question on this list wouldn't you like me to ask you again?
43. Are you connected to a suppressive person?
44. Are you connected to a suppressive group?
45. Have you stolen anything from a Scientology org?
46. Are you out to get even with Scientology?
47. Have you ever broken into a Scientology org?
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Reissue assisted by
Training & Services Aide
LRH:JG:lf
Copyright � 1965, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MARCH 1977R
REVISED 7 APRIL 1977
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo ("LRH in quotes")
Limited
Distribution
Saint Hills POWER CHECKLIST
AOs for info
Ref: HCOB 8 Jan 72RC Solo C/S Series 11RC
HCOB 21 Sep 70 Set Up for Power
HCOB 21 Sep 70 A Letter to Class VII and Class VIII
Students and Auditors
HCOB 31 Aug 74R C/S Series 93R New Grade Chart
HCOB 1 Nov 74R Rock Slams and Rock Slammers
HCOB 10 Aug 76 R/Ses, What They Mean
WHEN MADE OUT STAPLE TO INSIDE LEFT COVER OF PRECLEAR'S AUDITING
FOLDER.
C/S CHECKLIST ON FOLDERS OF PRECLEARS ONTO POWER
1. TA range OK. ________
2. Has been de-PTSed with PTS RD auditing and/or PTS/SP Detection,
Routing and Handling Checksheet so that any PTSness is terminatedly
handled. ________
3. C/S 53 done. ________
4. Int RD OK or properly corrected. ________
5. Lists OK or verified/corrected. ________
6. C/S Series 78 done if necessary. ________
7. Drug RD fully done: ________
(a) Full battery of Objectives. ________
(b) Disinterest drug items that read all run-none left unrun.
________
(c) All drugs on the list. ________
(d) Class VIII PSEAs and Prior Assessment all fully done.
________
("class VIII auditor not required.")
8. GF 40X fully handled including engrams-if resistive or Former Therapy
or Earlier Practices. ________
9. Runs well on Dianetics. (Including runs past lives.) ________
10. C/S 54 fully done-all items run R3R. ________
11. All grades run to EP with good Success Stories:
Single ( ) Triple ( ) Quad () ________
(a) ARC S/W ________
(b) Dianetics ________
(c) Gr 0 ________
(d) Gr I ________
(e) Gr II ________
(f ) Gr III ________
(g) Gr IV
12. R/Ses handled with full Expanded Dianetics. ________
13. Low OCA has been handled. (This means FULL Expanded Dianetics.)
"Means don't put a pc on Power who has not had his evil purposes and
R/Ses handled." ________
14. No illness after Grade IV or Expanded Dianetics. ________
15. No ethics trouble after Grade IV or Expanded Dianetics. ________
16. By D of P interview pc is happy with gains and not still wanting
something handled. ________
17. GF Method 3. ________
18. In Life ruds. ________
PC is fully set up and OK to go onto Power. ________
PC not OK for Power and needs the following per this checklist:
________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
EX DN
"The Grade Chart points are after Dianetics (like Drug RDs etc) but
before grades, after grades but before Power, after Power but before Solo,
and after OT III or after any single grade above OT III. These are the only
points where Expanded Dianetics can be delivered and the R/S fully and
completely handled."
If a pc has to have Ex Dn due to being an R/Ser before being allowed
onto Power he must be given full Ex Dn and no short cuts.
EXPANDED GRADES
Expanded Grades is not a requisite for Power. Expanded Grades very
often comes after OT III. It comes after Power too, but not between Solo,
Grade VI and OT III.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
LRH Tech Expeditor
and
CS-4/5
LRH:PA:lf.dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 MARCH 1977
Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Series 25
THE GAMBLER
An obsessive gambler is a psychotic just like a drug addict or an
alcoholic.
They are handled the way you handle any other psychotic. They don't
have to do anything for real in life because it all depends on chance and
never on themselves. So you have them on the minus effect scale.
Life isn't real to a psychotic gambler and therefore they never really
buckle down to anything. Consequences are unreal to them and criminal acts
are incomprehensible as nothing is real anyway.
Getting off overts is nothing to such people because they are not there
and take no responsibility for them. Everything else is responsible-not
them. Thus you have to find the trail to the R/Ses on the subject and
discharge those.
This aspect of such a case is the emergency number one handling.
It has to be recognized for what it is-PSYCHOSIS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: if
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 1977
(LRH in quotes)
Remimeo
XDn Ckshts
XDn Auditors
XDn Courses
PROGRAMMING OF EXPANDED DIANETICS
Ref: HCOB 19 Jun 70 C/S Q & A
HCOB 26 Aug 70 Incomplete Cases
HCOB 31 Mar 71 Programming and Misprogramming
HCOB 28 Sep 71 Know Before You Go
"Expanded Dianetics audits the pc at cause. PTS handling audits the pc
at effect. When you start a case or use a piece of Expanded Dianetics you
are auditing the case at cause.
"If you suddenly switch off Expanded Dianetics before it is complete
you cease to audit the case at cause and if PTS handling is then done you
would switch the case over to effect.
"This would be a valence shift and would worsen the case.
"This is one of the consequences of not handling Expanded Dianetics
fully and completely once it has begun.
"Sec Checking also audits the case at cause.
"One might program a case to handle his PTSness then handle by Sec
Checking and then finish with Expanded Dianetics and be home perfectly
safe.
"If one Sec Checked a case, began Expanded Dianetics, failed to
complete it and switched to PTS handling, the case would be audited out of
sequence and would flip from being cause to being effect."
So when a case is programmed for Expanded Dianetics and started on
Expanded Dianetics it should be fully and completely handled before any
other auditing is interjected. Expanded Dianetics should be a fully
completed cycle of action and not bit and piece.
"It is not OK to mix up Expanded Dianetics. It doesn't go into the
middle of PTS handling. Hold the form of grades and processes.
"Don't start a pc on one thing and switch to another without finishing
what you began. For example a case was started on Expanded Dianetics out of
the blue, followed by three S & Ds, then a GF of some kind, then a track
repair and then the S & Ds were handled. This is very bad programming.
"A case started on Expanded Dianetics must be programmed to complete
Expanded Dianetics. This should be programmed according to Expanded
Dianetics tech and not just one isolated item that needs handling.
"What is started on a case must be completed.
"A case on Expanded Dianetics, would fall into the other half of the
PTS/SP scene. By failing to handle a valence shift could occur the moment
that somebody starts
to assume that an Expanded Dianetics pc was the effect (PTS) instead of the
cause of the scene (Expanded Dianetics)."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
LRH Tech Expeditor
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:PA:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1977
Remimeo
EXPANDED GRADES
Expanded Grades can be done:
- After Drug RD
- After Full Dn RD
- After Quad Grades
- After Expanded Dn
- After Power (but before Solo or Clear or OT I to III and not during
these)
- After OT III
- After OT IV
- After OT V
- After OT VI
- After OT VII
In other words they can be done after any full completion of any one of
the above.
A typical and IDEAL program for a pc would be:
- Sub Grade Handling
- Drug Rundown
- Full Dianetics RD
- Quad Grades
- Expanded Dn
- Expanded Grades
- Power
- R6EW
- Clear
- OT I
- OT II
- OT III
- OT III X
- OT IV
- OT V
- OT VI
- OT VII.
However, due to bit and piece auditing done on some pcs Expanded Grades
is sometimes entered at other points.
Quad Grades (or even Single Grades for that matter) never should have
been abandoned and are restored.
Expanded Grades is NOT a requisite for Power but Quad Grades are.
Pcs flubbily can be programmed backwards like Expanded Grades, Drug RD,
Expanded Dn-etc. etc. But it is far from ideal.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dg.nt
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1977
Remimeo
Level III
Level IV
Snr Class IV LIST ERRORS
Ex Dn CORRECTION OF
All Cl IV Auditors
It has been found that the correction of lists, a very vital piece of
tech, has been a source of confusion in the field as it apparently has
never been written up in an issue. It really is simple if you know your
Laws of L & N.
VERIFYING A LIST
The correct procedure for verifying/correcting past L & Ns is to check
the items as to whether or not they are correct. Then do an L4BRA on each
list where the item is found to be incorrect. You would have to orient the
pc to the listing question and the item. You do not direct the question to
see if it read. And don't just do an L4BRA and then not find the right item
for the pc as part of the handling (unless the question proves to be
uncharged or some such).
NULLING A LIST
One nulls a list when he doesn't get a BD F/N item on listing. The Laws
of L & N strictly apply. An L4BRA would be used if the action bogs with
still no item found. One would also null lists the pc made where no item
had been found such as a 2WC which turned into a listing action with the pc
giving off items or a list the pc somehow made while not on a meter. In
these cases there is no item to verify with the pc as correct. Just cull
the items into a list, work out with the pc what the question was if it's
not already noted, and null the list.
RECONSTRUCTING A LIST
Sometimes you just don't have the list and can't get it or it's an old
Why Finding or PTS interview for which there are no worksheets. In this
case you get from the pc what the question was and then get him to give you
the items that were already on the list as the item probably was already on
the list and you don't want the pc to get into newly listing the question
in PT and then getting into an overlisting situation. Just get him to give
you the items he had already put on the list and more often than not you
will get a BD F/N item. If you don't get the item that way then you can
extend the list.
SELF-LISTING
Watch it on these as every random stray thought a person has about "why
this or that" does not mean it's a self-list. But do look for it on a
person who is manifesting the horrendous BPC an out list can generate, who
is introspected or has been trying to figure out who is doing him in after
just having seen the Ethics Officer. Just don't get into trying to make a
list out of some non-standard listing question that won't give you an item.
And actually the usual reason for self-listing is a prior wrong L & N item
or an item not found. People will self-list to try to find the right item.
So find and correct the earlier out list.
LIST CORRECTION BLOW-UP
When you are going along correcting lists and suddenly you get a big pc
blow-up and it is not resolving on the list you are correcting you had
better quickly realize that you probably are not correcting the list that
is out and you'd better find out which list
it is. There is usually an earlier out list to be found, if the list you
are correcting does not resolve the upset.
LISTS NOT READING
When you start getting key lists such as Grades III and IV not reading
and no items found it's time for that auditor to get a thorough overhaul on
his metering, eyesight and to get off all his MUs on L & N. You also could
be setting the pc up for a self-listing situation as he has been given the
listing question but no item has been found. So be very sure the question
did not read even with Suppress and Inval and TRs were in before getting
off a key L & N process.
USE OF L4BRA
The prepared list L4BRA corrects L & N lists. It can be run on old
lists, current lists, general listing. When a pc is ill after a listing and
nulling session or up to 3 days after, always suspect that a listing action
done on the pc had an error in it and get those lists corrected.
Sometimes it is obvious what the error was per the Laws of Listing and
Nulling. For example there could be two reading items left on the list in
which case you would know to extend the list as it has been underlisted. If
this didn't go, then an L4BRA would be done on the list.
HANDLING AN L4BRA
You handle reading questions on the L4BRA by the directions under the
question that read. You don't just 2WC these questions. For example say
question 4 read on the L4BRA, "Is a list incomplete? SF." You then ask the
pc, "What list is incomplete?" Locate it and get it completed to a BD F/N
item. You don't just 2WC "incomplete lists" to an F/N and leave it at that.
By the way the L4BRA is missing a line which is "Was it the first item
on the list?" This is being added as it's quite common that it is the first
item and is most often missed.
DO IT RIGHT
An out list can create more concentrated hell with a pc than any other
single auditing error. So it's imperative that listing errors get properly
corrected.
The best thing to do is to have the Laws of Listing and Nulling drilled
line by line and down cold and just do it right in the first place. Then
you will also see at once where old lists violated these laws and you will
not be yourself doing lists that have to be corrected later.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
CS-4/5
LRH:JE:dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1977
Remimeo (LRH is quoted)
Tech Divs
Qual Divs
Auditors
C/Ses
RECURRING WITHHOLDS AND OVERTS
Ref: HCO PL 7 Apr 70RA GREEN FORM
HCO B 15 Aug 69 FLYING RUDS
HCO B 10 Jul 64 OVERTS ORDER OF EFFECTIVENESS
IN PROCESSING
HCO B 6 Sep 68 CHECKING FOR FALSE READS
HCO B 11 Sep 68 FALSE READS
DEFINITION
The definition of recurring withhold or overt is an overt or withhold
that keeps coming up, repeats again, or shows up again. Definition is
obtained here from the American Heritage Dictionary and "the Scientology
Tech Dictionary." Before a recurring withhold or overt can be handled it
must be understood what one is. It is simply a withhold or overt that has
already been gotten off and comes up again as an answer to an apparent
reading withhold or overt question. The pc may also become exasperated at
having to get off an overt or withhold that has already been gotten off.
The pc may become upset, seem resigned or even protest a recurring overt or
withhold. These are just a couple of the signs of a recurring withhold or
overt.
METHODS AND HANDLINGS
1. When a pc gets upset with a withhold being demanded that they already
got off and they get into protest then "there is obviously a false read
as the pc is getting off overts already gotten off."
HANDLING: "Check for false reads on overts by asking the pc what
overt he or she has gotten off more than once and tracing it back with
the pc to what auditor or person said something read when it didn't.
You would clean all these up." (Reference: HCOB 6 Sept 68 CHECKING FOR
FALSE READS.)
2. When number 1 above doesn't handle the recurring overt or withhold:
HANDLING: "Who said or seemed to infer something read when it didn't?
Then this would be dated to blow and located to blow." (Reference: HCOB
11 Sept 68 FALSE READS.)
3. When a pc gets upset with getting off withholds or overts or mentions
he or she felt his or her overts weren't accepted.
HANDLING: Ask who wouldn't accept it E/S. (Reference: HCO PL 7 April
70RA GREEN FORM.)
4. "The pc has been invalidated for getting it off."
HANDLING: Find out who invalidated the pc for getting off overts or
withholds. (Note any terminals for later handling on the PTS RD.)
5. "The pc has been punished for getting it off."
HANDLING: "Find out who punished the pc for getting off overts and
withholds. "
The above methods of handling recurring overts and withholds can be found
in the reference materials listed above.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Paulette Ausley
LRH Tech Expeditor
LRH:PA:lf
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1977
Remimeo
LONG DURATION SEC CHECKING
It has been found on some cases which did not immediately R/S, even
though their crimes and past would seem to indicate they should have R/Ses,
that when Sec Checking was carried on for several sessions, one each on
several consecutive days, R/Ses then began to show up. In two cases, List
One R/Ses showed up on persons who had never been noticed as having R/Ses
before.
It can then be concluded that R/Sers do not R/S necessarily on casual
brief Sec Checks.
Part of this phenomena is that the person quite commonly gives off very
shallow overts of the order of "I stole a pen from HASI" or "I thought your
TRs were bad and I didn't tell you" and other shallow PT answers to
searching Sec Check questions.
This is so much the case that whenever I see shallow wishy-washy
"averts" coming off a case day after day, I suspect that sooner or later a
good auditor will suddenly find real roaring overts and R/Ses sitting
there.
The soft-spoken quiet "inoffensive" person is also a candidate for this
sort of disclosure.
Particularly notable is the person who "has never done anything wrong
in his whole life and has no overts of any kind."
These are just special cases of the same thing and an auditor should be
alert to them.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cb .dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MAY 1977
Remimeo
FOREWORD OF
EXPANDED DIANETICS
COURSE
(Issued on the 27th Anniversary of
Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health)
Expanded Dianetics contains our tech for the handling of the neurotic,
psychotic and destructive impulses in Man as well as some people who give
themselves trouble or have trouble.
Dianetics as early as 1950 and 1951 had its successes in this field.
Twenty years of research and experience isolated in 1970 what psychosis
really was.
When Expanded Dianetics was first issued those who compiled the case
histories left many of them out and those they included were not shown as
completed. This omission gave the impression that one did not finish an
Expanded Dianetics case. In the current checksheets this has been repaired.
Upper level auditors, in 1973, were using fragments of Expanded
Dianetics along with other processes. This has been smoothed out in the
present organization of the materials.
Such cases as those who can only be solved by Expanded Dianetics live
difficult lives and are often difficult to manage. Thus the auditor must be
very knowledgeable on these materials and very skilled. We can solve such
cases. But only where people know their business.
There are far more such cases around than one would suspect.
The destructiveness of Man and his apparent general tendency toward 4th
dynamic suicide stems entirely from a few of these types in his midst.
So Expanded Dianetics actually begins taking form with the first words
of the first chapter of Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health:
"A science of mind is a goal which has engrossed thousands of
generations of Man. Armies, dynasties and whole civilizations have perished
for the lack of it. Rome went to dust for the want of it. China swims in
blood for the need of it; and down in the arsenal is an atom bomb, its
hopeful nose full-armed in ignorance of it."
The last words of DMSMH were "For God's sake, get busy and build a
better bridge!" Nobody built the better bridge. So I did.
This full issue of materials and subsequent research presents, 27 years
later, all the tools we have in the field of handling destructiveness in
cases.
Use of these technologies brings us to a potential realization of
handling the state Man is in.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cb.dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MAY 1977
Issue II
Remimeo
Ex Dn Course
Ex Dn Auditors
Ex Dn C/Ses
Expanded Dianetics Series 29
PSYCHOSIS, MORE ABOUT
(Excerpted from HCOB 17 June 1971)
All aberration is to a greater or lesser degree nonsurvival.
To be rid of major aberrations is to have a new life.
To understand this one must understand the most severe aberration which
is psychosis.
The actual basis of all psychosis is motive. It is NOT competence or
incompetence.
Below all psychotic conduct lies an evil purpose.
Because psychiatry and psychology did not have this single technical
fact they defined psychosis as "incompetence," had the wrong target and so
could not and never did understand psychosis and were thereby led into
atrocities such as shocks and brain surgery and, in the country where these
subjects originated (Germany), slaughtered 300,000 insane in gas chambers
some time before Hitler came to power.
A true psychotic can be brilliant or stupid, competent or incompetent.
It is his general motive or purpose that determines whether or not he is
insane or sane.
Famous psychotics like Napoleon, Ivan the Terrible, Stalin and Hitler
were all quite brilliant yet wound up destroying everything in sight
including their own people.
They had a destructive basic purpose. Every psychotic has one. It is
usually covert, hidden, but in full play against his unsuspecting friends.
The sole difference in motive is whether it is destructive or
constructive.
Everyone has a basic purpose. The psychotic has a destructive one.
The test of a personality then, is whether the result of a person's
activity is destructive or constructive.
Man is basically good. When he finds he is being too destructive he
recognizes he is bad for others and seeks to leave. He will also try to
become less powerful, ill or to kill himself.
The progress of psychosis then begins with a belief something is evil.
This is followed with an effort to stop it. This stop becomes general. A
basic purpose is then formed which contains an evil intent.
The being then goes on from disaster to disaster, seeking overtly or
covertly to destroy everything around him.
At a guess about 15% to 25% of living human beings are psychotic and bring
covert disaster to those around them and themselves.
The evil purpose is expressed by committing harmful acts and
withholding them.
Ordinary overt/withhold processes, as in Grade II Expanded, can handle
this condition providing the person can be audited and providing the evil
purpose is also brought to view.
About 1/3rd of the psychotics handled in this way recover their sanity
fully and lead constructive decent lives. Two-thirds are either so far gone
or irresponsible hard to audit that they improve but are of little use.
Those already subjected to the brutalities of psychiatric "treatment"
or psychological "counseling" are the most difficult.
Those who have been on drugs, particularly LSD 25 as developed by
psychiatry "so their nurses would be able to experience what being insane
feels like" around 1950, are very difficult cases.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Excerpted by
FMO 1709 I/C
LRH:RS:lf
Copyright � 1971, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 MAY 1977
Remimeo
LSD
YEARS AFTER THEY HAVE
"COME OFF OF" LSD
Characteristics of persons who have been on it from examination of 2
cases:
1) They are disassociated-meaning they are separate from anything
they are doing.
2) Whatever occurs has nothing to do with him.
3) Not responsible for their own action or anything else and it
doesn't occur to them that they ever should be.
4) Their emotions are shut off to a greater or lesser extent.
5) Consequences mean little or nothing to them.
6) They are stupid.
7) Normal actions that another can do easily get mucked up by
them.
8) They are unpleasant to associate with.
9) They are de-humanized and can be vicious or irrationally cruel.
Apparently they have become a sort of a vegetable or a zombie to a
greater or lesser degree.
The LSD apparently stays in the system and is liable to go into action
again giving them unpredictable "trips." Which could be quite fatal while
driving and even walking around.
A Drug Rundown which has to include LSD cannot be considered complete
until the person has undergone a long period of sweating and heavy liquids
and exercise.
The way LSD got popular was because of Henry Luce, the head of Time
Magazine, who publicized it and glorified it from mid-1950 on. He and his
wife were under psychiatric care and were on LSD.
Nearly as I can trace it, it was the Nazi intelligence drug developed
in Switzerland and was probably intended for use in municipal water systems
to paralyze the population just prior to an invasion as the invading enemy
would then find them all irrational.
It only takes a millionth of an ounce to produce a "full trip."
When you are dealing with an LSD case or anyone who has ever taken LSD
you cannot and must not consider their Drug Rundown complete until they
have been sweated and given liquids and exercised for months as well as
heavily audited. They can recover with auditing and this handling, but it
won't be very fast.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:lf Founder
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JUNE 1977
Remimeo
(HCOB 30 AUGUST 71RA ISSUES I & 11)
(BTB 30 AUGUST 71 ISSUE I RG)
PAID COMPLETIONS SIMPLIFIED
Board Technical Bulletin 30 August 71 Issue I RF Revised 24 September
76, RF-I, Issue I RF-I, I RF-2 are hereby cancelled. It is not valid
anyway, nor any previous BTB on the subject of student, preclear or
interneship Paid Completions as they and their series cancel an HCOB. BTBs
cannot cancel HCOBs.
HCO Bulletins from 30 August 71 Issue I and Issue II forward dealing
with Paid Comps, student and pc points and ending with 30 August 71R Issue
I are likewise cancelled.
In their place is the formula given in LRH ED 153RK of 14 June 77.
1. Major Training Service 20 Points
2. Major Processing Service 5 Points
3. Minor Service 2 Points
MAJOR TRAINING SERVICE
This is defined as a certificate level action requiring around a month
to complete. Examples are HSDC, Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV. The
Student Hat is included as a major course even if covered in payment by a
Class course. The Primary Rundown, OEC, Senior Class IV, Expanded
Dianetics, Salesmanship Course, any formal special course, but not Dept 17
courses.
Any interneship for a single class counts equally to a full course and
is 20 points.
Saint Hills get 80 points for a completed SHSBC and 80 points for a
Senior SHSBC as these are very long courses.
AOs get 20 points for every Advanced Course completed and successfully
Solo audited (see auditing points as well for AO Solo).
When scholarships form part of any training fee and when the balance
was fully paid and the service successfully completed the full points of
the course are credited to Paid Comps.
MAJOR PROCESSING SERVICE
This is simply any 12 1/2 hour intensive completed on any formal HGC
processing. It includes any rundown, Word Clearing or auditing action
received by the preclear.
Saint Hills are the same but with an additional 5 points of each part
of Power completed.
AOs get a credit of 2 points for every 12 1/2 hours Solo audited.
Free auditing or service, student co-audits, staff auditing do not
count on this stat.
MINOR (DIVISION 6) SERVICES
These are any and all courses, services, co-audits requiring around I
to 2 weeks to deliver.
These include HAS, TRs, HQS, public co-audits, any course or
counselling or public paid action offered by Department 17.
These minor services must be paid, attended and completed to count on
the stat.
No points at all may be taken for any service the person did not
complete to the end.
BONUS POINTS
The three classes of service are interchangeable for the purposes of
bonus.
Anyone who, having successfully completed a (1), (2) or (3) service who
then resigns up for any other (1), (2) or (3) service is credited with
double the amount of the service just completed.
These bonus points are intended to ensure:
A. Quality of service.
B. Re-sign ups.
C. Bettered organization.
Any Reg. Public or Div 2, may sign up or re-sign up for any or all the
org's services.
Bonus points are received for every student or pc sent to an SH or AO,
meaning double for the last service taken in the sending org.
PACKAGE SALES
Where packages are sold such as multiple intensives or several courses,
Paid Comps are credited on the successful completion of each part of the
package-such as each 12 1/2 intensive and the bonus points for the last
intensive or course are automatically credited. This awards package sales.
They must of course be fully paid to count as Paid Comps or bonuses.
No bonus points at all may be taken unless the person actually signs up
for the next or another org service.
PENALTIES
The lack of bonus points on those who blow, request refunds etc.
operates as a penalty. Recovery or good handling so as to avert refund, as
in ARC break pgms, operates to restore the Paid Comps and, if new service
is signed up for, the bonus points that would otherwise have been denied
the stat are now restored to it.
F/N VGIs ratio at the Examiner is retained as per the original HCOB 30
August 71. In any given day where the F/N ratio at the Examiner falls below
90%, at the Examiner, there is a penalty of one point subtracted from Paid
Comps for each No below 90%. There is one point added to Paid Comps for
each % above 90% for any given day where F/N VGIs ratio at the Examiner is
above 90%.
If there is an unhandled red tag that is left unhandled for more than
24 hours, ALL HGC (or AO Solo & HGC) Paid Comps are lost for that day and
for every successive day that that pc remains red tagged.
For every day there is no HAS, full-time competent Recruiter, a Qual Sec
and a Staff Section Officer single-hatted on post in the org by reason of
no appointment (not by reason of occasional absence by reason of leave or a
day off) the CO or ED loses all his Paid Comps.
VERIFICATION
All Paid Comps and bonus computations must be verified by HCO. This
verification consists of examining the actual invoices for the completed
service to ensure it is fully paid, examination of C&A records and courses
to ensure it was actually completed. For bonuses verification consists of
examination of the actual invoices for re-sign up and the past invoices of
completion of the last service and other records to ensure the service was
fully paid and fully completed.
Of course the easiest way to verify is to have an up-to-date filed into
CF with the invoices going into them.
Any query or question concerning this HCOB is to be referred to LRH
Comm International via the local and Continental LRH Comm.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:dm.dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1977
Remimeo
ART AND COMMUNICATION
(Art HCOB No. 3)
When a work of painting, music or other form attains two-way
communication, it is truly art.
One occasionally hears an artist being criticized on the basis that his
work is too "literal" or too "common." But one has rarely if ever heard any
definition of "literal" or "common." And there are many artists simply hung
up on this, protesting it. Also, some avant-garde schools go completely
over the cliff in avoiding anything "literal" or "common"-and indeed go
completely out of communication!
The return flow from the person viewing a work would be contribution.
True art always elicits a contribution from those who view or hear or
experience it. By contribution is meant "adding to it."
An illustration is "literal" in that it tells everything there is to
know. Let us say the illustration is a picture of a tiger approaching a
chained girl. It does not really matter how well the painting is executed,
it remains an illustration and it IS literal. But now let us take a small
portion out of the scene and enlarge it. Let us take, say, the head of the
tiger with its baleful eye and snarl. Suddenly we no longer have an
illustration. It is no longer "literal." And the reason lies in the fact
that the viewer can fit this expression into his own concepts, ideas or
experience: he can supply the why of the snarl, he can compare the head to
someone he knows. In short he can CONTRIBUTE to the head.
The skill with which the head is executed determines the degree of
response.
Because the viewer can contribute to the picture, it is art.
In music, the hearer can contribute his own emotion or motion. And even
if the music is only a single drum, if it elicits a contribution of emotion
or motion, it is truly art.
That work which delivers everything and gets little or nothing in
return is not art. The "common" or overused melody, the expected shape or
form gets little or no contribution from the hearer or viewer. That work
which is too unclear or too poorly executed may get no contribution.
Incidental to this, one can ask if a photograph can ever be art, a
controversy which has been raging for a century or more. One could say that
it is only difficult to decide because one has to establish how much the
photographer has contributed to the "reality" or "literalness" in front of
his camera, how he has interpreted it, but really the point is whether or
not that photograph elicits a contribution from its viewer. If it does, it
is art.
Innovation plays a large role in all works which may become art. But
even this can be overdone. Originality can be overdone to the point where
it is no longer within any possible understanding by those viewing or
hearing it. One can be so original one goes entirely outside the most
distant perimeter of agreement with his viewers or listeners. Sometimes
this is done, one suspects, when one has not spent the labor necessary to
execute the work. Various excuses are assigned such an action, the most
faulty of which is "self-satisfaction" of the artist. While it is quite all
right to commune with oneself, one cannot also then claim that it is art if
it communicates with no one else and no other's communication is possible.
The third flow, of people talking to one another about a work can also be
considered a communication and where it occurs is a valid contribution as
it makes the work known.
Destructive attitudes about a work can be considered as a refusal to
contribute. Works that are shocking or bizarre to a point of eliciting
protest may bring to themselves notoriety thereby and may shake things up;
but when the refusal to contribute is too widespread, such works tend to
disqualify as art.
There is also the matter of divided opinion about a work. Some
contribute to it, some refuse to contribute to it. In such cases one must
examine who is contributing and who is refusing. One can then say that it
is a work of art to those who contribute to it and that it is not to those
who refuse to contribute to it.
Criticism is some sort of index of degree of contribution. There are,
roughly, two types of criticism: one can be called "invalidative
criticism," the other "constructive criticism."
Invalidative criticism is all too prevalent in the arts for there exist
such things as "individual taste," contemporary standards and,
unfortunately, even envy or jealousy. Too often, criticism is simply an
individual refusal to contribute. One could also state that "those who
destructively criticize can't do."
"Constructive criticism" is a term which is often used but seldom
defined. But it has use. It could probably be best defined as criticism
which "indicates a better way to do," at least in the opinion of the
critic. Those who simply find fault and never suggest a practical means of
doing it better rather forfeit their right to criticize.
Art is probably the most uncodified and least organized of all fields.
It therefore acquires to itself the most "authorities." Usually nothing is
required of an "authority" except to say what is right, wrong, good, bad,
acceptable or unacceptable. Too often the sole qualification of the
authority (as in poor teaching of some subjects) is a memorized list of
objects and their creators and dates with some hazy idea of what the work
was. An "authority" could considerably improve his status by using rather
precise definitions of his terms. The modern trend of seeking the
significance in what the artist meant is of course not likely to advance
the arts very much.
Viewing and experiencing art on the basis of what one is contributing
to it and what others contribute to it is a workable approach. And it would
result in improved art and improved appreciation.
Such a viewpoint, interestingly, also includes some things into the
field of art not previously so viewed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:pat
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HAVE YOU LIVED
BEFORE THIS LIFE?
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published October 1977
Have You Lived Before This Life? was first published in March 1960.
Growing public demand for knowledge about past lives was the catalyst for
expanding and republishing this book in October 1977. One of the new
chapters includes Ron's lecture entitled Death, originally given on 30 July
1957.
Both Dianetics and Scientology were researched by L. Ron Hubbard,
American writer and philosopher.
One of the more startling discoveries of Dianetics and Scientology was
that if a person's awareness and memory were adequately improved, past life
memories could be contacted. The memories were there, in person after
person, case after case.
Incredible? "Past lives are 'incredible' only to those who dare not
confront them," says Hubbard, "In others, the fact of former existence can
be quickly established subjectively."
Thousands and thousands of case histories have proven this out in over
a quarter of a century of research. Doubters and believers, skeptics and
scoffers have all discovered hidden memories they never knew existed.
This discovery has sparked off a tremendous amount of public interest
over the last 25 years. Today, more and more people are wondering about
past and future lives.
Have You Lived Before This Life? presents the original discoveries that
started it all.
If past and future lives are a reality, it calls for a reevaluation of
many of our current views, values and lifestyles.
This is a book which vitally affects every man and woman in the world
today. It is a look into the possibility of larger vistas to the human
drama than have ever been dreamed before-the possibility of a continuing
existence, with memory, beyond one lifetime.
An adventure awaits you. The adventure of you. You now stand on the
threshold of discovery.
324 pages, hard cover with dust jacket, glossary. Available from your
nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct from the publishers:
Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 4833 Fountain Ave.,
East Annex, Los Angeles, California 90029, U.S.A.; or Scientology
Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V, Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 DECEMBER 1977
Remimeo
All Levels
All Auditors
CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP
SESSIONS AND AN E-METER
In order to prevent constant interruptions of a session to get
dictionaries, prepared lists, etc. etc. and in the vital interest of
keeping the pc smoothly in session-interested in own case and willing to
talk to the auditor, the following checklist has been made.
An auditor should drill this checklist until he has it down thoroughly,
without reference to it.
A. PRE-APPOINTMENT:
1. Paid invoice slip of pc. ________
2. Pc folders; 2A. Current 2B. Old. ________
3. Pc folder study by auditor. ________
4. Folder Error Summary. ________
5. A C/S for the session. ________
6. Any cramming actions on the C/S. ________
B. CALL IN:
7. Enough time to do session. ________
8. APPOINTMENT (made by auditor or Technical Services).
________
9. Scheduling Board (auditor, pc, room, time). ________
C. ROOM READINESS:
10. Clean up room. ________
11. Smells removed. ________
12. Room temperature handled. ________
13. Area and hall silence signs made. ________
14. Silence signs placed. ________
15. Knowing where the w.c. is. ________
16. Right sized table, sturdy, doesn't squeak. ________
17. Side table.
18. Adequate light if room gets dark. ________
19. Flashlight in case power fails. ________
20. Quiet clock or watch. ________
21. Blanket for pc in case gets cold. ________
22. Fan or A/C in case pc gets too hot. ________
D. AUDITING MATERIEL:
23. Paper for W/Ss and lists. ________
24. Ballpoints or pencils. ________
25. Kleenex. ________
26. Anti-perspirant for sweaty palms. ________
27. Hand cream for dry palms. ________
28. Dictionaries including Tech and Admin Dictionaries and a
non-dinky one in language. ________
29. Grammar. ________
30. Auditing materiel, white forms, prepared lists including those
that might be called for on other prepared lists. ________
31. E-Meter. ________
32. Spare meter. ________
33. Preliminary meter check for charge and operational condition.
________
34. Meter shield (to obscure meter from pc). ________
25. In Session sign for door. ________
36. Extra meter lead. ________
37. Different sized cans. ________
38. A plastic bag to cover one can for pcs who knock cans together.
________
39. Finalize setting up room for session. ________
E. PC ENTRANCE TO AUDITING ROOM:
40. In Session sign on door. ________
41. Phone shut off. ________
42. Putting pc in chair. ________
43. Comfort of chair check with pc and handle. ________
44. Adjusting pc's chair. ________
45. Check pc clothes, shoes for tightness and handle. ________
46. Check with pc if room is all right and handle. ________
F. METER SET UP FOR SESSION:
47. Check test (for charge). ________
48. See that needle is not dancing by itself or auditing itself.
________
49. Make sure 2.0 = 2.0 by trim. ________
50. Snap in leads jack. ________
51. Verify trim by calibration resistor onto alligator clips.
________
52. Put needle on set. ________
53. Put pc on. ________
54. Adjust pc sensitivity for 1/3 dial drop by pc can squeeze.
________
55. Go through False TA Correction as needed including change of
cans, cream, anti-perspirant as needed. ________
56. Have pc take a deep breath and let it out and see if needle
gives a latent fall (which it should). ________
57. Check for adequate sleep. ________
58. Check to be sure pc has eaten and is not hungry. ________
59. Ask for any reason not to begin session. ________
G. START THE SESSION.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 FEBRUARY 1978R
REVISED 16 MARCH 1978
Remimeo (Revisions in this type style)
LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM
Ref: HCOB 25 Oct 71 DRUG DRYING OUT
HCOB 31 May 77 LSD
HCOB 2 Jun 71 CONFRONTING (for ref on gradients)
HCOB 5 Nov 74 DRUGS, MORE ABOUT
It has come to my attention that clarification is needed on HCOB LSD
Years After They Have "Come Off Of" LSD. No outlined program has been
issued on handling the LSD case.
For purpose of clarification "AN LSD CASE" is anyone who has ever had
LSD and not sweated it out and had a full Drug Rundown including
Objectives. "When you are dealing with an LSD case or anyone who has ever
taken LSD you cannot and must not consider their Drug Rundown complete
until they have been sweated and given liquids and exercised for months as
well as heavily audited. They can recover with auditing and this handling,
but it won't be very fast."
The Sweat Program came about because the "Restim" people who have been
on LSD experience appears to act like they had just taken more LSD. When
you audit out any other drug that's the end of it. But this isn't true of
LSD.
As it only takes 1/millionth of an ounce of LSD to produce a drugged
condition and because it is basically wheat rust which simply cuts off
circulation, my original thinking on this over the years was that LSD
sticks around in the body. That basically is the idea that underlies the
Sweat Program.
LSD is a "KILLER DRUG" and should be labelled as such. It was recently
found that many exec trainees who were off-loaded were LSD cases.
Don't hold somebody off Objectives and Drug Rundown just because he has
not had a Sweat Program. They can have their Objectives and Drug Rundown
and then go on the Sweat Program, that was the way it was originally
designed.
A "Sweat Program" would be for somebody who couldn't run Objectives or
a Drug Rundown because of LSD or for use after Objectives and a Drug
Rundown to get rid of the residual LSD.
It is the residual LSD we're trying to get rid of-LSD that may still be
in the body. It's no substitute for Objectives and a Drug Rundown. You must
not consider their Drug Rundown complete until they have completed the
Sweat Program and been heavily audited.
As the Sweat Program can be strenuous anyone not in good physical
condition is required to see a medical doctor in liaison with the Medical
Liaison Officer and C/S to obtain permission to exercise and do jogging.
Where exercise and jogging would be detrimental to the individual's health
this program should not be done and a more basic nutritional, medical and
auditing program done.
Doing this gradiently is very important as you are not only working LSD
out of the system but other bodily poisons will also be flushed out. If the
program is done out gradient the individual can become ill from body
changes that he is not able to keep up with.
As sweating depletes the body's mineral supply, extra salt needs to be
taken during this program. Indicators of salt depletion can be clammy skin,
tiredness, weakness, headache-perhaps cramps, nausea-dizziness (possible
vomiting), or possibly fainting. At the first sign of any one of these,
some salt should be taken. You can carry a salt shaker with you while
running too.
On this program, a person has to be watched because he will be getting
out crystals and could go on a trip-a real LSD trip from the crystals
coming out.
It is advised that the running jogging portion of this program be done
with another person.
VITAMINS AND MINERALS
The "Drug Bomb" in HCOB 25 October 71 DRUGS DRYING OUT, should be taken
three times a day. In addition the "Cal-Mag Formula" in HCOB 5 November 74
DRUGS, MORE ABOUT, should be taken 2 times a day. Plus, a teaspoon of salt
should be taken daily.
DIET
Quite reduced food intake is important here to get body fat or just
mass of the body decreased so that the residual crystals of LSD that have
accumulated can come out. If a person keeps eating a lot the body is going
to keep building layers of muscles and be busy with metabolizing new food
and chemicals for body energy as opposed to using the fat which has been
accumulated. This is especially important with the person who has fat as
fat has few blood vessels in it. Circulation in fat is poor so LSD in it
will not come out until that actual fat is burnt off the body.
In addition to reduced food intake it is important to increase liquid
intake as it actually flushes the wastes out of the body. In this way LSD
and other accumulated drugs when released from the cells pass through the
body pretty quickly so are not as likely to be re-absorbed. Natural juices,
no sugar or chemicals added, preferably freshly made, is the desirable
liquid to take and you can take as much as you want. Two quarts of fluid a
day is the minimum quantity to take. Fresh fruits can be eaten to get rid
of the hunger feelings one may experience but should not be consumed in
excess. For example: 4 nectarines, 1/2 lb of grapes, a pear and a banana
for the day.
In addition to the fruits satisfying the hunger they also give the body
minerals lost through sweating.
Besides fruit and juices some protein should be taken. The best source
being predigested liquid protein. These must be gotten from a good health
food store as opposed to a department store. For example "Progest" which is
made in New York is very good.
EXERCISE
It is very essential to exercise. The major exercise being done is
jogging or running. Exercise increases the circulation throughout the whole
body thus A) carries out cell waste more rapidly and B) causes the
circulation to go deeper into the muscles and tissues so those areas which
have been stagnant can now get rid of the "residual crystals" which have
accumulated.
In addition to increased circulation, exercise especially running
causes the body to sweat which will cause the crystals and toxic products
in the body to come out through the body pores.
A rubberized nylon sweat suit is essential in running as it will aid
sweating. This should not be started until the second to third week so that
the body can gradiently get used to profuse sweating.
THE SWEAT PROGRAM
1. The C/S in liaison with the Medical Liaison Officer starts the person
off on this program.
2. As necessary the C/S in liaison with the Medical Liaison Officer
orders the person to a medical exam by a medical doctor.
3. The Medical Liaison Officer informs the person of the vitamins he or
she is to take daily. This includes the "Drug Bomb" three times a day
and "Cal-Mag Formula" two times a day plus at least a teaspoon of salt.
4. The diet is fruit, heavy juices and water and two ounces of liquid
protein daily (2 oz of liquid protein daily is the minimum dose).
5. The jogging/running is now started on a gradient. The minimum
exercise time should be an hour a day. The more time that is put in,
the more sweating will be done and the program completed all the
faster.
A person can gradiently build up jogging/walking until he is solidly
up to Jogging/running for the entire hour.
It is important to set daily goals and try to make them to establish
a game and purpose to the daily exercise.
6. Once the Drug Rundown, which is Objectives plus Dianetics is done,
the pc may be audited on other actions while continuing with the Sweat
Program.
Lack of a Sweat Program doesn't stop other auditing actions. It is
factual that drug handling cannot be considered complete on a pa who
has taken LSD until the Sweat Program is completed.
The Drug Rundown is a specific rundown as given in HCOBs and is
finished as an auditing action when the pc has done all its steps.
What is not finished apparently is the possible residual LSD and this
is handled by a Sweat Out Program. The LSD and the body are part of the
physical universe.
So do not stop a pays auditing after he's done the HCOB's steps of a
Drug Rundown just because he still has to do a Sweat Out Program. Go on
auditing him on other actions but be sure he also completes a Sweat
Program.
A Sweat Program can be done BEFORE a DRD or even Objectives but should
not hold these up either.
RESULTS
The final result is to get the LSD residual crystals out of the body.
The phenomena that can occur are many. On this program one has to be
watched, because he will be getting out crystals and could go on a trip.
The reactions that one can undergo on this program can vary from
anything like actual tripping, heavy misemotion, somatics turning off and
on, etc. As the program progresses, the individual will become more
causative in his or her environment.
Confront and responsibility will definitely increase and have lasting
effects. The individual will become easier to work with and will like and
feel more comfortable with himself.
He will be healthier and more in tune with his body.
At first the individual may feel other-determinism about doing this program
but that will gradually change and he or she will want to do it for their
own welfare. Their responsibility will come up for themselves and others.
Emotions that have been shut off may start to reappear; they can blow
through stupidity and become more aware; they can do actions more easily;
consequences start to take on meaning to them; and they are aware of the
effects that their own actions have on themselves and others.
The above will vary from individual to individual but in each case
there will be great change for the better.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Paulette Cohen
LRH:PC:JD:kjm.dr LRH Tech Expeditor
Copyright � 1978 and
by L. Ron Hubbard Jim Dincalci
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LRH Medical Researcher
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 FEBRUARY 1978R-1
ADDITION OF 16 MARCH 1978
Remimeo
LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM-ADDITION
Ref: HCOB 31 May 77 LSD
HCOB 6 Feb 78R LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM
Clarification is needed at this time on the matter of the auditing of
the pc while on the LSD Sweat Program.
Once the Drug Rundown, which is Objectives plus Dianetics, is done the
pc may be audited on other actions while continuing with the Sweat Program.
Lack of a Sweat Program doesn't stop other auditing actions.
However, it is factual that drug handling cannot be considered complete
on a pc who has taken LSD until the Sweat Program is completed.
The Drug Rundown is a specific rundown as given in HCOBs and is
finished as an auditing action when the pc has done all its steps.
What is not finished apparently is the possible residual LSD and this
is handled by a Sweat Out Program. The LSD and the body are part of the
physical universe.
So do not stop a pc's auditing after he's done the HCOB's steps of a
DRD just because he still has to do a Sweat Out Program. Go on auditing him
on other actions but be sure he also completes a Sweat Program.
The Sweat Program can also be done before a DRD or even Objectives but
should not hold up a DRD or Objectives.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:PC:dr Founder
Copyright � 1978 Assisted by
by L. Ron Hubbard Paulette Cohen
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LRH Tech Expeditor
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 FEBRUARY 1978
Remimeo
Interneships
Academies
INTERNESHIPS VS COURSES
Courses are those activities done in Div IV, Dept 11 for the purpose of
training a student on the theory and materials necessary to perform certain
skills. The product of a course is a graduate who has learned his materials
and successfully applies what he has learned.
Interneships are those activities done in Div V, Dept 14 for the
purpose of perfecting the internees application of the basic skills learned
on the Div IV course. The product of the interneship is a flubless
professional.
Courses and interneships are two separate and distinct activities. When
you confuse the two by failure to fully comprehend their actions and
products you end up with overlong courses and overlong interneships.
FAST COURSES
A well-run course is where the student gets the theory. Through Word
Clearing, demos, drills and actual practical application of the materials
per his checksheet, the student is quickly gotten to a point where he
grasps the simplicity of the fundamentals of the level and can apply them.
Then from the viewpoint of experience with the basics he then rapidly
studies the rest of the techniques that comprise the level. He can produce
a competent result. This is a course graduate.
FAST INTERNESHIPS
Interneships are not where you learn theory. That belongs on the
course. Interneships are there to add polish to professional level.
Internes by definition train "onthe-job" under skilled supervision. They
acquire skills by doing, not by reading their theory again. They audit.
They C/S. They supervise. They get their errors corrected and they audit,
C/S and supervise some more. When they have done this in volume and
polished up their rough edges so they can think with their materials
without hesitation on what to do, they become professionals. This is an
interneship graduate.
EXISTING SCENE
All too often it is being found that interneships are being used to
teach the course again. Weeks are being spent restudying the materials for
checkouts. High Crime checkouts which have been done before are being done
again. High Crime checkouts have become everything on a level rather than
the basics which is not a lot of issues for any level. The purposes
expressed in the 5 Qual OK to Audit Series plus polishing to professional
standards the level just studied is the true purpose of interneships. Any
course grad who wore his hat as a student should be able to sit down and
check out his materials straight off as it is assumed he got it the first
time.
So any attempt to turn an interneship into a redo of the original
course must be a solution to quickied or badly supervised courses. The
right handling would be to reform your courses and get them straight and
require retreads on that course for any who show they missed the materials
when on the course.
THE REMEDY
The interneships will be streamlined on theory. Following HCOB 28 April
71 "OKAYS TO AUDIT IN HGCs," will make good auditors. To prevent the
interneships from becoming a long haul on theory it will now be required
that the student pass an exam on the course materials before routing on to
the interneship. Passing grade will be 85%. Missed questions are handled in
Cramming. Any who do not get a passing grade must retread the course before
being allowed on the interneship.
Should there be too many flunks then a Comm Ev must be requested by the
org KOT or LRH Comm on the org's executives for neglect and failure to
handle the courses.
SUMMARY
The theory and routine practical belong on the course. If an
interneship gets heavily into theory then there must be poor courses and
they had better be corrected and fast. This should settle any questions on
the matter.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
CS-5
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:JE:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 10 MARCH 1978
Remimeo
Div 2 CANCELS HCO PL OF 4 FEB 1970R
Div 4 AND HCO PL OF 4 FEB 1970
Registrar SAME TITLE
C/S
Tech Estimator
All Orgs
All SHs PILOT
HGC PC APPLICATION FORM
ORG:___________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
______
PRECLEAR NAME: DATE:
____________________________________________________________________________
______
CURRENT ADDRESS
_____________________________________________________________________
CITY PHONE
I (name) hereby apply for auditing:
Life Repair, any org
Drug Rundown, any org
Dianetic Case Completion, any org
Quad or Expanded Grades, any org
Expanded Dianetics, Continental Orgs, St. Hills, orgs where
authorized
Power, in a St. Hill Org
Solo Levels (R6EW, Clear, and OT) in an Advanced Org
Any special type of rundowns (Ls, Int RD, PTS RD, etc.). Specify what
rundowns:__________________________________________________
I realize it may be necessary to prepare my case for a major action,
such as above or to handle medical actions or to get auditing for chronic
somatics or particular difficulties.
_________________________________________________________
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
REGISTRAR: DATE: _______________
1. Originates this Routing Form.
2. Tentatively signs up the applicant and receives payment.
3. Issues temporary invoice for payment received.
4. Logs name of applicant to follow up if not returned on this
form.
5. Routes applicant and this form to Testing.
6. Alerts Tech Services to applicant arrival on lines and to get
applicant's PT folder to Tech Estimator for study as
applicant will be there shortly.
TESTING: DATE: _______________
LOCATION: __________________________________________________________
1. Immediately administers OCA/APA, Aptitude and IQ tests.
2. Has applicant wait while tests are immediately graded.
3. If necessary gets help from Tech Services so applicant is not
kept
waiting.
4. Attaches test results to this form.
5. Routes applicant to Tech Estimator.
TECH ESTIMATOR: DATE:______________
LOCATION: _________________________________________________________
1. Quickly reviews pc's PT folder (if available). Does not keep pc
waiting.
2. Interviews the applicant, following the HGC PC TECH ESTIMATION
FORM.
3. Reviews the tests and Estimation Form with regard to case gain,
what the applicant is trying to handle, time spent on earlier
actions.
4. Writes in his estimate on the last page of Estimation Form in
duplicate with any additional comments for the Registrar and
signs the form.
5. Pc is/is not (circle one) accepted on lines. Number of
intensives required:
______________________________________________________
TECH ESTIMATOR
6. Informs the applicant of the estimate. Handles any purely
technical questions but not finance or sales matters.
7. Routes the applicant and this form to the Reg with a duplicate
copy of last page of Tech Estimation Form.
8. Routes the Tech Estimation Form to pc's folder.
MAA: DATE:_______________
LOCATION: __________________________________________________________
(AOs AND SHs ONLY)
1. Gives ethics clearance to receive Advanced Levels (Power and
up).
REGISTRAR: DATE: _______________
LOCATION: __________________________________________________________
1. If an illegal pc, returns any money temporarily invoiced and
routes to Ethics for R-Factor.
2. Signs the applicant up for the full estimate.
3. Receives payment for rest of the estimate or arranges payment
for the rest as applicable. Fully invoices all money received
including any on temporary invoice.
4. Completes full sign-up forms, waivers, etc. for full tech
estimate.
5. Signifies applicant fully accepted by his agreement to full
estimate.
6. Signifies applicant not accepted by his refusal to accept
estimate and/or work out necessary financial arrangements.
Routes to Ethics for R-Factor.
7. If first sign-up, Reg makes a record for his own files for
future follow -up .
8. Prospects at the close for others in need of tech estimates.
9. Routes applicant and this form to Tech Services.
TECH SERVICES: DATE:_______________
LOCATION: __________________________________________________________
1. Finds out where the pc's folders are and arranges to get them
immediately.
2. Schedules the pc for auditing.
3. Routes this form to CF.
- END OF ROUTING FORM -
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
CS-5 & CS-3
LRH:JE:FF:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1978
Remimeo
HSDC
All Dianetic Auditors
POSTULATES AND ENGRAMS
Ref: Dianetic Auditor's Bulletin Jan 52
(Tech Vol 1, page 196)
HCOB 20 Aug 63, R3R-R3N THE PRECLEAR'S POSTULATES
HCOB 16 Jun 70, C/S Series 6, WHAT THE C/S IS DOING
ADVANCED PROCEDURES AND AXIOMS
DMSMH
A full Dianetic EP consists of F/N, erasure, cognition and VGIs. This
has been well covered in Dianetic HCOBs and is expected of all Dianetic
auditors. The Dianetic auditor is running out the forces and charge
contained in the pc's engrams and in doing so the pc's thoughts and
postulates which were buried in the charge will come off in the form of
cognitions. When the charge is removed the pc is then able to evaluate and
discard these postulates in PT as he sees fit. It is also an indicator of a
full EP as a pc who has not gotten the force off an incident is very
unlikely to recover the thoughts in the form of cognitions.
Where a pc reaches the basic on a chain and apparently flattens this
but without all parts of a full Dianetic EP in evidence the auditor can ask
the pc if he postulated anything in the basic incident. This should
complete the full Dianetic EP. If not, the incident hasn't had all the
force taken off and should be run through again and continued per standard
Dianetic tech to full EP. In the case of an assist one can ask for the
postulate made just prior to the illness or injury. Where you have a full
Dianetic EP of F/N, erasure, cog and VGIs there is no need to ask for
anything further.
One does not list for anything. One doesn't use "what." No repeater
technique. Just ask the question and get your full EP or flatten the
incident.
What the pc postulated just before or while under the stress and pain
of his engram could be any manner of significance to the pc, but it is of
no significance to the Dianetic auditor other than as a means of ensuring
he has gotten the full Dianetic EP and has removed all the charge and force
in the pc's engram. Then you will see a very happy preclear.
AN ENGRAM CHAIN IS NOT COMPLETE UNLESS IT ENDS WITH F/N, ERASURE,
COGNITION AND VGIs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
CS-5
LRH:JE:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 MARCH 1978
Remimeo
Snr HSDC
QUICKIE OBJECTIVES
Ref: HCOB 12 Apr 62, CCHs PURPOSE
HCOB 11 Jun 57, TRAINING & CCH PROCESSES
HCOB 3 Feb 59, FLATTENING A PROCESS
CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY
CONTROL AND THE MECHANICS OF SCS
HCOB 14 Aug 63, LECTURE GRAPHS (No. 5 on
pg 342 of Tech Vol V)
Recent investigations into the effectiveness of Drug RDs including
their rate of repair and re-repair revealed a marked tendency to quickie
Objectives.
Failure to run Objectives fully and completely, especially on a case
with an extensive drug history can set up the pc for less than optimum gain
on Dianetics. A Drug RD without full and complete Objectives is not a Drug
RD.
TWO-WAY COMM
The easiest and very out tech way to quickie Objectives is to run some
commands and then put the pc on the meter and 2WC to F/N or do some fast
"rehab." But did the Objective process ever get run? What actually F/Ned,
the Objective or the 2WC? Any Objectives run this way are invalid.
The tech of Objectives is extensive and still very much in force. They
have their own EPs and with these they are fully run to actual change for
the pc. Only this is valid handling of Objectives.
CURE
The way to handle auditors who quickie Objectives is a full W/Cing of
the subject and a big clay demo of the purpose of Objectives and a big clay
demo of what effect Objectives have on running a Drug RD and R3R. Then get
the auditor's own Objectives flattened.
Any Drug RD that needs to be repaired or redone must include a careful
study of the Objectives to see if they were honestly run and if the valid
Objective EPs on the processes themselves were obtained. Where the
Objective was obviously quickied just R-Factor the pc you are going to
flatten it and do so. If the EP of an Objective was questionable you can
ask the pc what happened and if he F/Ns on a real Objective EP fine,
otherwise flatten the process.
A fully completed Drug RD with Objectives sets the stage for the pc to
fly up the Grade Chart so do it right the first time.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by CS-5
LRH:JE:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MARCH 1978R
REVISED 12 NOVEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Cancels BTB 16 Dec 73 Word Clearing
Series 51 WORD CLEARING ERRORS.)
Word Clearing Series 59R
WORD CLEARING DEFINITIONS
Ref: Word Clearing Series 54
The question has recently come up of whether you clear each and every
definition of a word for that word to be word cleared. Some words have
definitions that lead into technical definitions, specialized definitions
or obsolete definitions. So what do you clear when clearing a definition of
a word?
There is no reason under the sun to look up every definition or to even
read specialized definitions for a word.
The rule actually is to know the definition of the word as given for
the context for which it is being used. and that's it.
You have to look over a full definition to find out which definition
applies to the text you have been reading.
There are some words that have 30 or 40 definitions-most of them highly
specialized and of no real use in a vocabulary.
So you don't need to look up definitions of a word that don't apply.
YOU WANT THE DEFINITION WHICH APPLIES TO THE TEXT YOU HAVE BEEN READING. Of
course, if you are clearing a word with Word Clearing Method 1 or Method 8
or when the context of the word is not given you would clear each
definition excepting technical and specialized definitions which do not
apply.
Then you use it in sentences until you have it as a concept.
A cleared word has been defined as follows:
A WORD WHICH HAS BEEN CLEARED TO THE
POINT OF FULL CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING.
Also you don't look up every word in that definition either. You look
up words in a definition only if you find in the definition another word
you don't understand.
Hope this helps to make your Word Clearing a more simple and pleasant
task.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 1978
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 58
ETHICS PENALTY FOR WORD CLEARERS
(Ref: HCOB 13 Sep 71, Para No. 3)
It has been found that the reason Word Clearers cease to be Word
Clearers and blow Word Clearing and the reason Word Clearing drops out in
orgs lies in the failure of the Word Clearer to clear the words on himself
at the same time he was clearing them on the preclear. This is done without
losing one's presence as an auditor or Word Clearer and without winding up
with the student word clearing the Word Clearer.
Hereafter when it is found that a Word Clearer has been accumulating
misunderstood words by failure to clear them on himself he will be subject
to a Court of Ethics with minimum penalty the loss of a week's pay or
allowance and if the offence is repeated he will be subject to a Comm Ev.
The offences on this are frequent and are a basic Why on Word Clearing
dropping out in orgs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:jg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 APRIL 1978
Remimeo
Course Supers
Cramming Off
TR DEBUG ASSESSMENT
Reference: HCOB 16 Aug 1971 TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED
HCOB 7 Apr 1973R GRADIENTS IN TRs
BTB 15 Aug 1971R TR COURSE BUGS HANDLING
BTB 16 Aug 1971R BREAKTHROUGH-TR COURSE
HCOB 8 Dec 1974 TR 0-NOTES ON BLINKING
BTB 18 Aug 1971R TR COURSE-HOW TO RUN
BTB 5 Nov 1971RA TR COURSE DEBUG DRILL
The purpose of this list is to give a TR Supervisor a standard list to
find the cause of a student's bog on doing TRs, after standard Word
Clearing actions have been done but have not resolved the situation.
The supervisor must have an OK to operate an E-Meter and must have been
passed on Assessment TRs in Qual to assess the list.
The student is put on the meter, checked for sleep and enough to eat.
He is then given an R-Factor that you are going to do a short assessment to
find out what the real trouble is on doing TRs.
Then the list is assessed.
Clear the words of each line from the last word to the first before
calling the line.
1. Have you been doing TRs over a misunderstood word? ________
(Clear the misunderstood word or words. Each to F/N.)
2. Have you gone exterior while doing a TR? ________
(Indicate. If no F/N on indication route the student to Qual for
handling.)
3. Have you been overrun on a TR? ________
(Indicate, rehab if no F/N.)
4. Were you put on the TR Course in the middle of another auditing
action? ________
(2WC the action he was incomplete on to F/N. Send data to C/S for OK
or not OK on continuing TRs.)
5. While on the TR Course did you already have an upset in life?
________
(Handle the ARC Brk or send to C/S.)
6. While on the TR Course did you already have a heavy problem?
________
(Handle the problem or send to C/S.)
7. While on the TR Course did you already have an unwillingness to let
something be known? ________
(Pull the W/H or send to C/S.)
8. On the TR Course have you been falsely passed? ________
9. Have you falsely passed someone? ________
10. Did you fake passing so you could get out of doing more?
________
11. Is there some other reason? ________
(Send to HGC for handling.)
12. Was this list unnecessary? ________
(Indicate it and return student to course.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Rick Sheehy
CS-4 I/T
and
Paulette Cohen
LRH Tech Expeditor
LRH:PC:RS:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL 1978
Remimeo
AN F/N IS A READ
Ref: HCOB 2 Nov 1968R CASE SUPERVISOR CLASS VIII
THE BASIC PROCESSES
HCOB 20 Feb 1970 FLOATING NEEDLES AND END PHENOMENA
HCOB I Aug 1970RA F/N AND ERASURE
I recently took over the C/Sing of a case on a Dianetic Assist and
found that F/Ns were being neglected as reads.
This pc had a Dianetic list listed out that gave an F/Ning item. All
the other reading items were handled with the exception of this F/Ning
item.
An F/Ning item is a reading item. An F/N is only a read when an item
F/Ns at the end of you calling it. The F/N would occur instantly upon
calling the item.
So what does this mean that an F/N is a read? A read means there's
charge there to handle. It means there is force connected with that
significance that is available to the pc to view and run. An F/Ning item
means there's charge there as the F/N means something just keyed-out so
there must be charge there for there to be a key-out. After all what is
keying out?
You can get four F/Ns off the same item. The first one is in finding
the item, the second one in running recalls, the third one is in running
secondaries and the fourth one is in running the engrams.
The basic mechanics of key-out, key-in and erasure have to be
understood before you can understand why an F/N is a read and when it would
be a read.
An F/N also means stop that is it end of process, end of rud or end of
action being handled. To confuse this with an F/N being a read could be
fatal for a pc.
There is no substitute to understanding basics when it comes to
understanding what an F/N is; when it means go and when it means stop for
that process or action.
An F/Ning assessment does not mean that the assessment is now all
reading. This means that the actions have been done and the charge is off
that area at least temporarily.
An instant F/N on an item means this item is keying out some charge
that can be keyed-in again and run which is really what any other read is
saying; there's charge there to handle.
This piece of tech can make the difference in a case being totally
handled and just doing better. Understand it and use it and you will see
the difference in the results.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:PC:dr
Copyright � 1978 Assisted by
by L. Ron Hubbard Paulette Cohen
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LRH Tech Expeditor
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 APRIL 1978
Remimeo
THE SWEAT PROGRAM FURTHER DATA
Ref: HCOB 6 Feb 78R LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM
HCOB 31 May 77 LSD
HCOB 3 Aug 73 PEP
HCOB 5 Nov 74 DRUGS, MORE ABOUT
The Sweat Program HCOB of 6 February 1978R describes how the original
Sweat Program was run. This is a very effective program.
Recent research has given us more data for the program which you should
know about.
OVERWEIGHT PEOPLE
It is important that fat on the body be removed as this is one of the
main places that LSD can lodge. Compared to the rest of the body, fat
tissue has little circulation in it. LSD lodged in fat can stay there for a
long time.
UNDERWEIGHT PEOPLE
Underweight people on a strict diet and running can lose more weight
than they can afford to lose. This could be detrimental to their health.
On the LSD Sweat Program, a regular balanced diet is okay for the thin
person. The weight should be maintained. However, refined sugar or flour
and their products should not be taken. See HCOB 3 August 73, PEP.
In this program, the increased circulation and exercise is as important
as the sweating.
NORMAL WEIGHT PEOPLE
Those who start at a normal weight and continue to lose weight to the
point that their health can be affected should go back to eating well-
balanced meals (omitting refined sugar and flour products). This should
stop the continued weight loss.
TRIPS
If a person is having trips during the program, he should take a lot of
extra Vitamin B Complex and Vitamin C as these aid the body, especially the
liver in getting rid of the LSD which is in the system. Normally the
vitamins in the program are sufficient for the body to handle the LSD which
comes out.
VITAMINS
Pure natural plain yoghurt taken with the vitamins will help prevent
stomach upsets from taking too many vitamins at once. Please ensure that
your vitamins are not taken on an empty stomach for they can cause stomach
burn. Enteric vitamins are not essential as long as the "bomb" is taken
with food.
SHOES
The best type of shoes to use for jogging are the ones which are well
cushioned in the heel and toe. These are quite popular right now for
jogging. They are available in all different colors and stripes.
They should be of good quality, give arch support, be comfortable and
be well cushioned, especially in the heel.
This cushioning absorbs the shocks to the body as the heel hits the
ground. Running and jogging go much better with these shoes.
CAL-MAG
Calcium and magnesium supplements can be taken as a substitute for the
CalMag Formula in HCOB 5 Nov 74, DRUGS, MORE ABOUT. Just ensure that the
full daily requirement of each is taken daily. This will prevent muscle
soreness from the exercising.
VEGETABLES
Green vegetables are okay during the program. To get the most benefit
from them, they should be taken raw or steamed. Different lettuces,
tomatoes and cucumbers are fine to take. The majority of the food eaten
should still be fruit.
Vegetable juices are OK. A variety should be used throughout the
program so that different nutrients and minerals can be gotten from the
different vegetable sources.
PROTEIN
Predigested protein is not the only protein that need be taken. It was
used on the original program to good effect, however, there are several
good powdered protein supplements on the market. Check your health food
store for data on these. Be sure to get one with a high protein, very low
carbohydrate content, which has all 8 of the essential amino acids. The
label should state or show that all of the essential amino acids are
present.
SALT AND POTASSIUM
Salt (sodium chloride) is not mandatory on the program. It is only
necessary as a treatment if the symptoms of salt depletion (heat
exhaustion) occur. These are clammy skin, tiredness, weakness, headache,
sometimes cramps, nausea, dizziness, sometimes vomiting and fainting.
As potassium is also lost in sweating, some of the above symptoms can
come from potassium depletion. So, if salt does not handle the above
symptoms then try either potassium gluconate tablets or "salt substitute"
which is mainly potassium.
In the program, few of the above symptoms occurred when heavy fruit
intake was occurring. This is due to the fact that there is sodium and
potassium in fruit and vegetables. Consequently supplementing these
minerals is not usually necessary if a lot of fruit and vegetables are
consumed.
HEALTH
If a person does not feel better during this program after 3 to 4
weeks, a doctor can be consulted to check for endocrine problems or organ
malfunctions as these can sometimes hinder a person's progress on the
program.
People with known heart conditions and high blood pressure or kidney
conditions must do a program which is of a much lower gradient. An exercise
program and diet must be worked out with a doctor.
GRADIENT
Doing this program gradiently is very important.
Here is a typical program sequence: First of all start jogging wearing
the proper shoes. The first couple of days just jog 10 minutes, don't worry
about diet or vitamins or sweat suit. Just get out and jog.
The next couple of days jog 15 minutes. Continue increasing the jogging
time gradiently until after 4 weeks you are up to 1 hour.
If you can get up to one hour running sooner, all the better. If you
can run more than an hour a day regularly, that is even better. The more
running and sweating, the better.
If you are so breathless that you can't speak to another while you are
running then you are straining too much. Cut the gradient back.
You can start taking vitamins anywhere in the first couple of weeks,
but the best results occur if the vitamins and minerals are taken from the
start.
During the first month of build up, you should cut out all sweets,
especially refined sugars and flours and their products. If you are
overweight, cut down on food quantity in this time. At the end of the
month, meat should be eliminated and fruit and vegetables should be the
source of food.
After 1 month you can start running with the sweat suit. You should be
running a full hour pretty comfortably before you start with the sweat
suit. Sweating when wearing the sweat suit will increase markedly so watch
for salt depletion.
PROGRAM ODDITY
Very occasionally you will come across someone who has undergone
extensive exercise and sweating for months and gotten rid of residual LSD.
When starting on the LSD program, no further changes occur but there were
earlier changes during the earlier sweating and exercise.
It is not just sweating that is necessary but also the increased
circulation from the intensive exercise. LSD also has the effect of
reducing circulation.
The point is, the case was sweated, exercised earlier and did get rid
of the LSD. This is a very occasional phenomenon but has been known to
occur.
EP
The evidence that there is no more LSD there, is that points 1 through
9 in HCOB 31 May 77, LSD are no longer present. The final adjudication of
the completion of the LSD Sweat Program lies with the C/S in liaison with
the Medical Liaison Officer.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:JD:nc Founder
Copyright � 1978 Assisted by
by L. Ron Hubbard Ens. Jim Dincalci
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LRH Medical Researcher
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 MAY 1978
Remimeo
Cramming Off (Taken from LRH ED 140 INT)
C/Ses
Cramming Series 17
TECH QUALITY
My current concern is tech quality over the world. Whereas the majority
of auditors do a good job, there are some who don't, and it is these who
have our reputation at stake.
The general outness has been traced (as usual) to out TRs and metering.
Lack of a Cramming in Qual Divs and even lack of Qual Divs is what has
brought this about.
TRs and metering are out of the view of a C/S. He only sees what is
written on the Auditor Report.
A Cramming should exist in every org and every bog should cause the
auditor to be sent to Cramming on the material missed.
As TRs and metering are not visible to the C/S, Cramming should always
add "Two hours TRs and metering" as a matter of course. This was the way it
was when tech was more consistent.
A TR 1 that can't be heard (or blows the pc's head off), a TR 2 that
consists of "That didn't read. That read" and TR 4 that is pure Q and A,
plus missed reads and bypassed F/Ns can wreck any program.
A Cramming in every org and required verification of TRs and metering
will go a long ways to improve tech quality.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 MAY 1978
Issue I
Remimeo
DIANETICS: URGENT COMMAND CHANGE
Ref: HCOB 26 May 197811 ROUTINE 3R REVISED
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
It came to my attention the other day that Dianetics is being run using
the wrong commands and even has some omitted procedure. This was quite a
breakthrough to find as it explains some of the trouble that has been
showing up with Dianetics throughout the world.
MOVING THROUGH THE INCIDENT
When a pc is first made to run an incident he is given the command to
move through the incident to some certain time later. On the second run
through the pc has been given the command SCAN through to the end of the
incident. This second command is incorrect. The pc should be made to move
through the incident with each run through.
Scanning an incident is another tech entirely and is covered in the
early PABs under scanning but when you scan a pc during engram running you
don't get them back into the incident and couldn't possibly discharge that
incident. As early as Book One I found that you had to return the pc to the
incident and MOVE them through and if they bounced then you would command
them to RETURN TO THE INCIDENT as that is what you are after. So R3R
Command C is changed to "MOVE THROUGH THE INCIDENT."
RETURNING THE PC TO THE INCIDENT
It will happen in Dianetic running that something in the incident that
the pc is running will command them off the incident. This is called a
BOUNCER. The pc just bounces right off the incident. The way to handle this
is quite simple you simply command the pc to RETURN TO THE BEGINNING OF THE
INCIDENT and to move through the incident. Commanding the pc to RETURN TO
THE INCIDENT will enable you to get the pc to move through it and the force
of the incident will come off.
This is quite an interesting piece of tech that has been known and
worked since the advent of Book One. It, unfortunately, fell out somewhere
along the line and wasn't being used. It is now being reinstituted and in
fact its use is making a tremendous difference in Dianetics running right
this very minute.
GETTING THE POSTULATES IN THE BASIC INCIDENT
Now and again a pc will run Dianetics whereby they F/N on the basic
incident and have VGIs but no cognition has come off. The pc has not fully
viewed the postulates in the incident here to obtain full end phenomena.
When this occurs and you have your F/N VGIs yet no cognition is voiced,
ask the pc "Was there something that you postulated in that incident." The
results will be quite astonishing and the pc will have his or her full end
phenomena and that will be it for that chain.
To not allow a pc to fully view the incident that is basic and get all
the charge and postulates out of it will leave the case charged up and
sooner or later the case will go sour on Dianetics.
There may be more than one postulate in the basic incident. You as the
auditor want to get off the postulates in the basic incident accompanied by
F/N and VGIs. This is your Dianetic end phenomena.
When the pc voices the postulate and has the full end phenomena there
is no need to check further.
The auditor has to know his HCOBs on end phenomenas.
NARRATIVE HANDLING OF INCIDENTS
We just had a pc the other day that ran for 25 hours on one incident
and when that pc was finished with the incident the results were miraculous-
a changed person with changed activities in life. The old rule applies of
it takes as long as it takes is really true with Dianetics narrative
running or any other Dianetics for that matter.
Narrative running can take a long time to get the pc through and what
you are interested in here is running the incident narrative to erasure and
only going earlier similar if it starts to grind very badly.
Failure to properly run a narrative incident will give the auditor and
C/S the idea that things don't seem to handle on this case. It also gives
the pc losses on handling things for himself. All that is needed is
sufficient running of the narrative incident to its full end phenomena and
this will no longer be the case as Dianetics does work except when it is
not applied correctly. Part of the application of narrative running is to
ensure that enough run throughs have occurred so that the incident is fully
discharged.
URGENT EMPHASIS
Emphasis on the proper running of Dianetics cannot be stressed enough
as it can make the difference between a well and happy preclear or one with
losses in auditing, things not being handled and Dianetics getting a bad
name when in fact it is the only technology ever known to handle the mind.
Dianetics, when properly applied, produces miracles so why settle for
less. Apply it by the book and those miracles are yours to be had.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Paulette Cohen
LRH Tech Expeditor
LRH: PC:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JUNE 1978R
REVISED 14 JUNE 1978
(Revision in this type style)
Remimeo
Cram Off Hats
All Auditors
IMPORTANT
Cramming Series 18R
CRAMMING REPAIR ASSESSMENT LIST
HISTORY: I recently made an important technical discovery that a
person, org or area can be totally bogged by a mis-cram or by an R/Ser
operating under the guise of a "Cramming Officer." In the particular
instance, one R/Sing Cramming Officer had bogged an org and then a second
R/Sing Cramming Officer took over to "repair it," resulting in a nearly
total crash.
To remedy this, I developed the following Cramming Repair List. In
subsequent use of it, including people who had been mis-crammed elsewhere,
the usage appeared quite miraculous.
It has been found that faulty, quickie or mis-cramming can result in
continual goofs or an apparency of out-ethics as the person isn't
correcting. This list covers the basic errors that can occur in cramming.
It has also been found that a Cramming Officer who has consistent overt
products will mess up an area. This list is used to correct such cramming.
This list can be used by an auditor in session who finds the pc has
bypassed charge on his past cramming. It is also used when a bog or impasse
occurs during or following a cramming action.
Its main use is to clear up an org or area where it is found that one
or more Cramming Officers have been messing it up. In such an instance, it
is applied to every past or present staff member. In such an instance
particularly, its use can result in a miraculous resurge of the org or
area.
Needless to say it can produce a remarkable resurgence in a person who
has a history of being mis-crammed.
The list is done in a session by an auditor who has a Qual OK to assess
a prepared list and Qual OK to operate an E-Meter.
Auditor Instruction: In case of a wrong why, use L4BRA. In case of self-
listing or out list, use L4BRA. In case of any read find out who and when
as needed to handle the question. If any question reads keep at it until
you F/N it. F/N every item on the list that reads, then F/N the whole list
on a final assessment of it.
In calling these items to the pc call them as questions, not as
statements. This is the case in this list or any other prepared list. Do
not call them as statements as this will tend to evaluate for the pc and
even invalidate him.
If the list does not F/N or if the cramming repair does not seem to be
getting anywhere, do a C/S 53RK and return to and F/N the Cramming Repair
List after you've handled the C/S 53RK.
NAME: DATE:_______________
1. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN A WRONG WHY? ________
(L4BRA . )
2. DO YOU HAVE A WRONG WHY? ________
(L4BRA.)
3. AS A RESULT OF CRAMMING ARE YOU SELF-LISTING? ________
(L4BRA.)
4. DO YOU SELF-LIST? ________
(L4B RA . )
5. WERE YOU CRAMMED OVER OUT RUDS? ________
(Find out which and handle E/S to F/N.)
6. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC-X? ________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
7. HAVE YOU BEEN UPSET WITH SOMEONE'S HANDLING OF YOUR AREA?
________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
8. HAVE YOU ARC BROKEN ANOTHER? ________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
9. DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? ________
(Get what and E/S to F/N.)
10. HAVE YOU MADE ANY PROBLEMS FOR ANOTHER? ________
(E/S to F/N.)
11. DO YOU HAVE ANY WITHHOLDS? ________
(Get what and E/S to F/N.)
12. HAVE YOU WITHHELD THAT OTHERS HAVE WITHHOLDS? ________
(Handle as W/H. E/S to F/N.)
13. HAVE YOU BEEN CRITICAL OF ANOTHER? ________
(Get prior overt. E/S to F/N.)
14. HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS? ________
(Get what and E/S to F/N.)
15. HAVE YOU BEEN UPSET BECAUSE SOMEONE SEEMED MAD AT YOU? ________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
16. DID YOU STILL HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN YOU LEFT CRAMMING? ________
(E/S to F/N.)
17. WAS CRAMMING A PROBLEM TO YOU? ________
(E/S to F/N.)
18. DID YOU FEEL WORSE AFTER BEING CRAMMED? ________
(Ind E/S to F/N.)
19. HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD ANYTHING F/N'D WHEN YOU FELT IT HADN'T?
________
(Find out what and ind. E/S. Handle what hadn't really F/N'd.)
20. HAVE YOU FELT SOMETHING SHOULD HAVE F/N'D WHEN THE CRAMMING
OFFICER/AUDITOR DIDN'T INDICATE IT HAD? ________
(Indicate. 2WC E/S to F/N. Rehab any O/Rs.)
21. HAVE YOU HAD MISUNDERSTOODS THAT YOU STILL MISUNDERSTOOD AT THE END
OF CRAMMING? ________
(Get them and handle per Word Clearing tech.)
22. HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS BEEN MISSED? ________
(Get them and handle per Word Clearing tech.)
23. HAVE WITHHOLDS BEEN MISSED? ________
(Get what and E/S to F/N.)
24. HAS THE WRONG MATERIAL BEEN GIVEN YOU TO CLEAR UP A MISUNDERSTOOD?
________
(Find out what. Ind E/S to F/N. Clear up any MUs.)
25. HAS NO MATERIAL BEEN GIVEN YOU TO CLEAR UP A MISUNDERSTOOD?
________
(Find out what. Ind E/S to F/N. Clear up any MUs.)
26. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS NOW? ________
(Find out what. Handle per Word Clearing tech.)
27. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS THAT YOU HAVEN'T CLEARED UP? ________
(Find out what. Handle per Word Clearing tech.)
27a. WERE YOU MADE TO LOOK UP WORDS YOU ALREADY UNDERSTOOD? ________
(Indicate E/S to F/N.)
28. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THE CRAMMING ORDER?
(2WC E/S to F/N.) ________
29. HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SENT TO CRAMMING?
________
(Find out who and what. E/S to F/N.)
30. HAS THE CRAMMING OFFICER BEEN CRITICAL OF ANOTHER? ________
(Get who and what E/S to F/N. Then check for "Have you been similarly
critical?" Get M/W/H.)
31. HAVE YOU FELT PTS TO YOUR AREA? ________
(Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.)
32. IN CRAMMING HAS ANYBODY INVALIDATED YOU? ________
(Find out who and what. Ind E/S to F/N.)
33. IN CRAMMING HAS ANYBODY EVALUATED FOR YOU? ________
(Find out who and what. Ind E/S to F/N.)
34. HAVE YOU GOOFED AND NOT TOLD ANYBODY? ________
(Find out what. Handle as a M/W/H. E/S to F/N.)
35. IS THERE SOME OTHER REASON FOR TROUBLE IN YOUR AREA? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
36. ARE YOU HAVING GENERAL CASE TROUBLE? ________
(Find out what to F/N, C/S 53RK if necessary.)
37. DID THE CRAM INTERRUPT YOUR USUAL AUDITING? ________
(Ind E/S to F/N.)
38. DID THE CRAMMING OFFICER RUSH YOU? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
39. WAS A CRAM QUICKIED? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
40. DID THE CRAMMING OFFICER FAIL TO DRILL YOU? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
41. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE? ________
(Ind E/S to F/N.)
42. WAS THE CRAM DONE OVER SOME OTHER BYPASSED CHARGE? ________
(Find out what and handle.)
43. WAS THIS ASSESSMENT UNNECESSARY? ________
(Ind E/S to F/N.)
44. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? ________
(Find out what and handle. GF if no joy.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Special Tech Project
LRH:STP:dr.nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
URGENT IMPORTANT
The key to Expanded Dianetics is:
1. Incomplete or misdone Objectives.
2. Incomplete or misdone Drug Rundown including Sweat Program.
3. Incomplete or misdone Dianetics.
When these are not done, incomplete or misdone, one does not have any
real chance of getting down to the basic evil purposes of the case and will
at best run off locks and so the case won't recover or will relapse.
LRH:nc L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (3 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3-R COMMAND
CHANGE
REVISES HCOB 26 MAY 1978 ISSUE 11
ROUTINE 3-R REVISED
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
Routine 3-R FLOW ONE, STEP ONE command is changed as follows:
"Locate a time when you had a________."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Commodore's Staff
LRH:AB:dr Captain
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard As ordered by
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
[HCOB 26 May 1978 Issue II is not included in this volume since it is
cancelled by HCOB 26 June 1978RA. See page 380 of this volume.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 JUNE 1978R
REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type sty/e)
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
A great deal of material has existed about assessment of the preclear.
In New Era Dianetics Dianetic assessment has been summarized and simplified
and added to. These New Era Dianetics assessment steps are precise. And
they will detect and isolate the things that have to be handled to make a
pc a well and happy being.
It is important to understand what assessment is and what you are
attempting to accomplish when doing an assessment.
If you simply understand that you are trying to find an item that reads
well, brings in the pc's indicators, in which the pc is interested, an item
which was usefully worded and would run, you would have it.
In New Era Dianetics, several different kinds of assessment are used to
get items to run out R3RA on the pc.
The New Era Dianetics Original Assessment Items
This is the first assessment done in New Era Dianetics. It has been
known by various names, "Health Form," "Preclear Assessment Sheet" and is
now reissued with only minor changes as HCOB 24 June 78R New Era Dianetics
Series 5R, ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET.
It contains the pc's physical history and background, and gives the
auditor and C/S a picture of the case. It is an assessment as it is done on
the meter and enables the auditor and C/S to see what needs to be handled.
Original Item
The original item is a condition, illness, accident, drug, alcohol or
medicine, etc. that has been given by the pc to the auditor. This will come
from the Original Assessment Sheet, from another New Era Dianetics rundown
or may simply be offered by the pc.
Original items tend to be general in character, such as "lame" or a
medical condition, and are either lacking things you will find on the
Preassessment List or are too broad to be audited. Pcs normally give items
this way when asked for them on the New Era Dianetics Original Assessment
Sheet, NED Series 5R.
Preassessment
Preassessment is a new procedure in New Era Dianetics. It is done with
a prepared Preassessment List and determines what categories of somatics
are connected to the original item, and which of these is the most highly
charged.
It is called the preassessment because it comes before the assessment
of the actual item to run out R3RA. (The item to be run out is now called
the running item.)
Preassessment is done on the original item with the Preassessment List.
Preassessment List
This is found in New Era Dianetics Series 4-1.
A prepared list of categories of somatics which is assessed in
connection with the original item. (The list includes pains, sensations,
feelings, emotions, attitudes, misemotions, unconsciousnesses, sorenesses,
compulsions, fears, aches, tirednesses, pressures, discomforts, dislikes,
numbnesses.)
Preassessment Item
The largest reading item obtained on an assessment of the Preassessment
List. This item is used to get running items.
LISTING FOR RUNNING ITEMS
The auditor now takes the preassessment item and makes a list on a
separate sheet of paper and asks the pc, "What (preassessment item found)
are/is connected with (original item found)?"
The auditor writes down exactly what the pc says in a column and notes
the meter reads at the exact moment the pc ends the statement of the
running item.
The result is a list called the "running item list."
If the pc gives you an exact feeling ("feeling scared," "a burning
feeling in my ear," "a sharp pain in my toe") the feeling is simply run out
R3RA Quad if it reads and the pc is interested.
An item which states a somatic and is runnable is called a running
item. Running items are exactly stated pains, sensations, feelings,
emotions, attitudes, misemotions, unconsciousnesses, sorenesses,
compulsions, fears, aches, tirednesses, pressures, discomforts, dislikes,
numbnesses.
If the pc gives you a general type item like "stomach problems," a
drug, alcohol, medicine, medical term or narrative, which does not state a
feeling (etc.), the feelings (etc.) for the item must be found so they can
be run. The preassessment is done to get running items.
Running Item
The auditor takes the best reading item on the running item list
(possibly an LF or an LFBD or an instant F/N) and checks with the pc, "Are
you interested in this item?" and if so it becomes the running item which
you will run by R3RA Quad.
Running items are sometimes abruptly volunteered by the pc and if they
are within the categories of the assessment list they can be run, but be
careful of: 1) jumping onto some other subject than the original item you
are trying to handle or 2) upsetting the pc because you refuse to audit it.
Warning: If you go off New Era Dianetics assessment procedure you will be
pot shooting all over a case and never finish it.
All this New Era Dianetics procedure is leading up to finding running
items that will run and resolve the case. So the thing you are after in
assessment is the running item and it is most accurately obtained as above.
This is done by taking the original item, say "stomach problems," doing
a preassessment on it, and with the preassessment item, finding a running
item.
(Example: Stomach problems is the original item. A preassessment is
done and "sorenesses" is the largest reading item on the Preassessment
List. The auditor then lists for running items, using sorenesses, and gets
"A dull soreness on my left side." This is the running item, which will be
handled with R3RA Quad.)
PREASSESSMENT
Previous to New Era Dianetics you would have taken a Dianetic item such
as a drug or a chronic condition or an accident and you would have asked
the pc to give you the attitudes, emotions, sensations and pains connected
to the item.
I have just developed a new procedure on the handling and running of
Dianetics. It is called the preassessment. This is how it works.
1. The auditor obtains an original item from the pc. This will be from a
drug list, the Original Assessment Sheet or other New Era Dianetics
rundown. (It will be a drug, a condition, an illness, an accident,
etc.)
2. He then preassesses the feelings on the Preassessment List to find
out which preassessment item is the most highly charged in connection
with the original item.
3. From the preassessment item (the largest reading Preassessment List
item) the auditor can get specific somatics called running items from
the pc. These running items will be the ones the pc is most interested
in.
4. The running item found in Step 3 is run R3RA Quad.
Example: The original item is "bronchitis." The auditor assesses the
Preassessment List below by asking the pc:
"Are__________connected with bronchitis?"
pains compulsions
sensations fears
feelings aches
emotions tirednesses
attitudes pressures
misemotions discomforts
unconsciousnesses dislikes
sorenesses numbnesses
He gets an LF on misemotions. This is the largest read.
"What misemotions are connected with bronchitis?"
As the pc tells him, the auditor takes them down, noting meter reads
while the pc is giving the items. (And that's all there is to the
preassessment.)
PREASSESSMENT ITEM
This is in turn the largest reading item on the Preassessment List
above and then subsequently lesser reading items from the same list are
taken up.
With the preassessment item gotten, the auditor can list to find the
running items.
(Example: The preassessment item is "misemotion." The auditor asks,
"What misemotions are connected with bronchitis?")
He writes down all the answers the pc gives him, with their reads.
Feeling like I want to give up X
Worried about my lungs LFBD
Feeling angry about not breathing F
Scared to death sF
The auditor would first run "worried about my lungs" R3RA Quad and then
would return to the next best reading item, in this case, "Feeling angry
about not breathing. "
RUNNING ITEM
The auditor chooses the largest reading item the pc has given and
checks interest for the next chain. This is the running item.
ACTUAL AUDITING
Having found the running item the auditor then runs it out R3RA Quad.
FINDING THE NEXT RUNNING ITEM
The auditor has a choice of taking a lesser reading item from the
Preassessment List or the running item list or (safer) do a new
preassessment on the same original item. (You don't stop working on the
original item until it is gone completely and forever. )
Having done a preassessment on the same original item you do a new
running item list, take the best read (fall, LF, instant F/N) and use it as
your new running item.
ASSESSMENT COMMANDS
Commands for the Original Assessment Sheet of the New Era Dianetics
Rundown:
1) Ask the question on the Original Assessment Sheet. Write answer and
note meter read.
2) "Are (preassessment item being called) connected with (original item
being preassessed)? "
3) "What (largest reading preassessment item) are connected with
(original item)?"
4) "Are you interested in running (largest reading or instantly F/Ning
running item found in 3 above)?"
5) Go straight into R3RA Quad, using the item in 4 if the pc is
interested.
HANDLING SOMATICS
The Preassessment List is designed to locate somatics which the auditor
can then handle with R3RA.
By somatic is meant a pain or ache, sensation, misemotion, or even
unconsciousness. There are a thousand different descriptive words that
could add up to a feeling Pain, aches, dizziness, sadness, they are all
feelings.
All chains are held together by the general various awarenesses which
are named on the Preassessment List.
One generally identified difficulty given by the pc on the original
assessment is, in actual fact, in almost all cases composed of pains,
sensations, feelings, emotions, attitudes, misemotions, unconsciousnesses,
sorenesses, compulsions, fears, aches, tirednesses, pressures, discomforts,
dislikes and numbnesses as well as one or more postulates. It is very
possible that any major Original Assessment item contains 3 or 4 full
chains for each one of these.
Hence an auditor really hasn't got a prayer of eradicating a major
Original Assessment unless he runs 64 or more complete chains thoroughly
and accurately. Some might give up with less and some might require many
more.
If you follow the New Era Dianetics assessment procedure perfectly and
flawlessly, well you have every chance of achieving a well and happy human
being.
HANDLING NARRATIVES
A narrative is a story, an account, a tale.
For many years narratives were held in disrepute and auditors were
sometimes warned against running them. The reason for this is that when you
try to solve a case on narratives alone it takes several thousand hours of
auditing.
However to abandon narratives totally is to abandon some of the most
dramatic case changes you can get.
Occasionally the pc will come into a session after a physically or
emotionally painful experience, an accident, illness, loss or great
emotional stress. Running these incidents out narrative erases the psychic
trauma the person has undergone and speeds recovery.
You sometimes find that a person's whole life changed around the death
of a relative or child or a divorce or an auto accident or some other
similar catastrophe. This is usually found and handled in ACTION NINE in
the HCOB 22 June 1978R New Era Dianetics Series 2R, NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL
PC PROGRAM OUTLINE.
When running a narrative, one is running out the narrative incident. A
narrative needs to be run and run and run on that one incident. You are
running that incident to erasure and you only go earlier similar if it
starts to grind very badly.
The trick in running narratives is to find the earlier beginning each
time the person is moved through it. (See ACTION NINE, New Era Dianetics
Series 2.)
A condition or circumstance without an incident is NOT narrative. An
example of this would be "obstruction of justice." It would not run as
there is not an exact incident. "Hitting a cop" is a narrative. "Feeling
sick about cops" is not a narrative as there is no story connected with it,
but there is a somatic.
RUNNING NARRATIVES
To run a narrative item, the auditor must first find out exactly what
happened with the pc, then, by asking the pc "What shall we call this
incident?" he will have the preclear's wording and can run it narrative
using the New Era Dianetics narrative commands. One would run a narrative
item ONLY if it reads well and the pc is interested in running it out.
Narrative handling to its full EP can give miraculous results, but it
can take a long time to get the pc through it. A full Dianetic EP of
postulate off (which IS the erasure), F/N and VGIs must be reached. If the
pc gives a cognition which is not the actual postulate from the incident or
doesn't sound like it to the auditor, the postulate is asked for.
NARRATIVE ASSESSMENT COMMANDS
1) Ask the questions called for on the Original Assessment Sheet.
2) Note any original items that contain recent losses, illnesses,
accidents, upsets or deaths and ask:
"Are you interested in handling (description of item on the Original
Assessment Sheet)?"
3) If the pc signifies that he is, go immediately into R3RA Narrative.
ASSESSING TONE OF VOICE
The auditor does the assessing by asking the question as a question,
not as a statement of fact. To assess the question as a statement tends to
evaluate and can even invalidate the preclear.
You can go around asking questions with a tape recorder going. Play it
back and you will notice the voice tone rises on a question and goes down
on a statement. So the right way to assess the questions would be to have a
slight upcurve at the end, and actually assess it as a question.
ASSESSMENT IS DONE BY THE AUDITOR BETWEEN THE PC'S BANK AND THE METER.
THERE IS NO PARTICULAR NEED IN DIANETIC ASSESSING TO LOOK AT THE PC. JUST
NOTE WHICH ITEM HAS THE LONGEST FALL OR BD. THE AUDITOR LOOKS AT THE METER
WHILE DOING AN ASSESSMENT.
Rote procedure gets heavily in the road of a Dianetic assessment. The
pc gives a list, the auditor doesn't watch the reads and note them, then
the auditor commonly goes back to assess the list. By that time the surface
charge is off. He should have watched the meter in the first place and
taken reads while the pc was originating the item. Why all this assessing
of the finished list? Of course when you already have a list done by
another with no reads marked on it, you have to read it off and mark what
reads. And using a list a second time you have to read it off to the pc to
see what reads.
In Dianetics one always handles an instant F/N first, then any LFBD,
LF, F or sF, in that order. The largest reading items are the ones the pc
can most easily confront. When the largest reading item is handled go on to
the next biggest reading item (and so on) until all reading items have been
handled. This same principle applies to all New Era Dianetics auditing.
Take up the biggest reading areas and handle those first.
You may find there is something plainly visible that is wrong with the
preclear, like a broken leg, yet it may not read at all. Instead the meter
is reading on the pain in his arm. You do the standard action of handling
the items that the meter reads on.
In assessing a prepared list such as the Preassessment List always take
up the item which got an instant F/N first followed by the next largest
read.
In a list like the running items list you continue listing until the pc
says that's all or you've got an F/N item. If you get in trouble right
after listing a running item list on a pc and the pc seems upset and you
are not a Scientology auditor, go get a Scientology auditor Class IV fast
and have him repair the list for you as it may have become a Scientology
list either through auditor error or inability to read a meter or missing a
read or whatever.
The laws of listing and nulling always apply to Scientology lists and
sometimes on rare occasions apply to a Dianetic list and can on these cases
cause trouble.
Listing for a running item on the running item list usually doesn't
cause trouble as it is already taken from the Preassessment List and is not
a very broad question.
This and a failure to follow New Era Dianetics assessment and R3RA
procedure exactly or failure to actually erase the basic on a chain is
about all the trouble you'd run into.
Review New Era Dianetics Series 1 on what is expected of a student.
LRH:lfg.dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 3
OBJECTIVE ARC
I have recently added a new process to be done before the full battery
of Objective Processes. It is called Objective ARC.
Objective ARC is the first Objective Process to be done on a pc. It is
followed by CCHs 1-10, Op Pro by Dup. SCS on an object, SCS, and SOP 8C as
covered in HCOB 11 June 57 Reissued 12 May 77 Training and CCH Processes,
PAB 80, PAB 97, PAB 34, and HCOB 4 Feb 59 Op Pro by Dup.
The commands of Objective ARC are run 1-2-3, 1-2-3, three commands
given repetitively.
The commands are:
"Look around here and find something that is really real to you."
"Look around here and find something you wouldn't mind communicating
with."
"Look around here and find something you wouldn't mind being around."
(An alteration of the original command because the original command was
too steep.)
The pc and auditor are ambulant.
This process will bite suddenly and bring a person up to present time.
It has been known to crack cases.
Of all Objectives, this process tends to be the shortest. It often ends
with a very bright cog after only a few commands.
The end phenomena of this process would be person in present time,
cognition, and very good indicators, accompanied by an F/N.
The above will accomplish a great deal for the pc if done correctly and
with flawless TRs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
New Era Dianetics Series 15
IDENTITY RUNDOWN
We have never before had a Dianetic process specifically directed to
getting a pc into valence. This result has occasionally been achieved by
Standard Dianetics as one of many miracles produced, but previous to this
there has been no Dianetic RD which specifically lends itself to handling
valences.
You can, of course, order them into valence in an incident but that
isn't in the realm of R3RA.
PROCEDURE
1. Have the pc make a list of all the things he has never wanted to
have.
2. Do preassessment on those that read in 1. Quad R3RA reading items,
first checking interest.
3. Have the pc list all the things he has never wanted to do.
4. Do preassessment on those that read in 3. Quad R3RA reading items,
first checking interest.
5. Have the pc list all of the things he has never wanted to be.
6. Do preassessment on those items that read in 5. Quad R3RA reading
items, first checking interest.
The end phenomena of this process is when the pc originates that he is
in valence, or some similar remark such as for the first time he feels
himself.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: lfg
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
NEW ERA DIANETICS
SERIES 1
New Era Dianetics is a summary and refinement of Dianetics based upon
30 years of experience in the application of the subject.
In that 30 years I have found much that could improve results if
properly applied.
And in that 30 years, many issues have been written by others that were
a bit altered and some materials have been lost. New Era Dianetics corrects
these points.
Also, recently, I have done additional research and have come up with a
few breakthroughs.
In 1950, I said we should build a better Bridge.
Well, in 1978, here is a better Dianetics section of the Bridge.
Old-timers in Dianetics will only approve these upgrades. There is no
invalidation of what they know already to be true. But there are
refinements about which they are jumping with joy.
New Era Dianetics is even more acceptable, even more workable.
I did this review to move Dianetics back into the "miracles as usual"
band and the student studying it and the auditor practicing it will find
that if he follows its precision drills with precision he will be able to
handle life and the spirit as never before.
Of course I cannot claim or guarantee that anyone audited on Dianetics
or New Era Dianetics will become cured of illnesses which would best be
handled by immediate medical treatment and I cannot promise any pc that all
of his undesirable conditions will be eradicated since that depends on the
state of training and the accuracy of application by the student.
THE STUDENT
What does a student need to know and do to acquire the skill of a Dianetic
auditor?
0. The student needs to have completed the Student Hat. He needs
to be able to handle study tech. Without that, his misunderstood words will
wipe him out. Study tech is contained in the Student Hat. The definitions
are in the Tech and Admin dictionaries and standard dictionaries. The
student must not go by a single word he does not know the definition of.
1. He should know the background of Dianetics as contained in
several books on the subject, particularly the Original Thesis and
Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.
2. He needs an E-Meter and must know how to handle it.
3. He should have good TRs as acquired in a TR course.
4. He should have a good grasp of Objective Processes, both to
make him a better auditor, and to enable him to do full Drug Rundowns.
Objectives are actually Scientology processing but if a Dianetic auditor
doesn't know and cannot do them he is dependent on a Scientology auditor to
finish up the Drug Rundown.
The training of a Dianetic auditor in Objectives is not as complete as
a Scientology auditor's. But it is sufficient to enable him to do those
Objective Processes necessary to get a person off drugs or to get him in
condition to run Dianetic processes.
5. He should have a good grasp of the materials of New Era
Dianetics.
6. He should be able to make and assess lists of Dianetic items as
called for in specific assessments of a preclear in order to complete
rundowns and preclears.
7. He must be able to do TR 101 to 104 flawlessly. using the
commands of New Era Dianetics.
8. He must know how to do Dianetic Assists.
9. He must be able to assess and handle a Dianetic Repair List and
do repair actions.
10. He must be able to handle Dianetic remedies and all other
actions called for in a complete Dianetic course or processing.
11. He needs to be able to apply what he knows.
If the student can acquire the above skills he will achieve fine
results.
It does not require mile long checksheets to make a good Dianetic
auditor.
It does require study and hard effective drilling.
And it requires a desire to help oneself and others and really make a
better Bridge and a better world by putting it there in terms of faultless
application.
Scientology goes on and is above Dianetics. But Dianetics is the solid
base of all this research. So learn and apply it well.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ldv
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JUNE 1978R
REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type sty/e)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
This bulletin has been revised to give the rearranged steps
and a new final step for the New Era Dianetics Drug
Rundown.
New Era Dianetics Series 2R
NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE
As a person goes through life and lifetimes he collides with
secondaries, losses, deaths of those he is closely connected with,
injuries, accidents, illnesses, operations and emotional stresses. These of
course are not all, but cover the main complaints and symptoms of pcs.
Dianetics lends itself to handle the current, past and occasional
complaints and symptoms as above.
It achieves its results by addressing and handling the spirit and is in
no way to be confused with medical or other practices.
The end phenomena of Dianetic auditing is a well and happy pc. These
steps as laid out below if ALL DONE and with precision will give just that.
NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PROGRAM OUTLINE:
THE ACTIONS OF THE NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PROGRAM ARE TO BE RUN IN THE
ORDER THEY ARE GIVEN. THE PRODUCT IS A WELL AND HAPPY PC AND THIS IS
THE DIRECTION YOU GO, STEP BY STEP TO ACHIEVE THAT PRODUCT.
ACTION ONE: ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
This sheet is thoroughly filled out with the pc on the meter. It gives
you the pc's history, what drugs and alcohol he has taken in this
lifetime, illnesses, operations, present physical conditions, mental
treatment, medicines and perception difficulties. (Ref: HCOB 24 June
1978R New Era Dianetics Series 5R, ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET).
At this point the data is taken only. Do not attempt to handle any of
the items on this step. (Ref: HCOB 24 June 1978R NED Series 5R).
ACTION TWO: HANDLE ANY PTSNESS
It must be noted that you have to handle any PTSness before you can
begin any auditing. Pcs who are PTS will not hold their gain. Therefore
any PTSness must be handled before auditing is begun. (Ref: HCOB 10 Aug
73 PTS HANDLING, HCOB 20 Apr 72 SUPPRESSED PCs AND PTS TECH, HCOB 9 Dec
71RC PTS RD).
ACTION THREE: OBJECTIVE ARC
I have added a new process to be done before the full battery of
Objective Processes. It is called Objective ARC. This is the first
process to be done on a pc
and will bring a person up to present time. (Ref: Objective ARC is
covered in HCOB 19 Jun 1978, New Era Dianetics Series 3, OBJECTIVE
ARC).
ACTION FOUR: SWEAT PROGRAM
A Sweat Program will be necessary if the person has taken LSD or Angel
Dust. It may also be indicated when a person has been subjected to
exposure to toxic substances which have lodged in the tissue and fat of
the body. In future times psychiatrists or others of ill repute may
develop other compounds such as LSD which lodge in the systems; a Sweat
Program may be indicated in these. (Ref: HCOB 15 July 71RA III Rev 27
Jun 78, Re-Rev 19 Sep 78, New Era Dianetics Series 9R, DRUG HANDLING).
ACTION FIVE: OBJECTIVES
A . . . battery of Objectives is done on this step. This consists of
the following Objective Processes properly and fully done to their
complete EP for each process: ... CCH 1-10, ... SCS on an Object and
SCS.... (Note: SOP 8C and Op Pro By Dup are run on a later step.) (Ref:
HCOB 15 July 71RA III Rev 27 Jun 78, Re-Rev 19 Sep 78, New Era
Dianetics Series 9R, DRUG HANDLING).
ACTION SIX: HARD TR COURSE
On this course, the preclear will thoroughly do TRs 0-9. (Ref: HCOB 15
July 71RA III Rev 27 Jun 78, Re-Rev 19 Sep 78, New Era Dianetics Series
9R, DRUG HANDLING, HCOB 16 Aug 71R, TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED, HCOB
7 May 68, UPPER INDOC TRs, BPL 18 Sep 78 New Era Dianetics Hard TRs
Course).
ACTION SEVEN: CS-1
Before we can even begin a pc on Dianetics we have to indoctrinate him
into what Dianetics is and what is expected of him as a pc.
This is standardly and effectively accomplished by using the Standard
Dianetics CS-1, HCOB 9 Jul 78R, DIANETIC CS-1.
ACTION EIGHT: DRUG RUNDOWN QUAD
It has been proven time and time again that until you audit out, each
by name, the drugs, alcohol and medicine a person has taken, he does
not make good case gain.
A person who has been on drugs, alcohol or medicine seldom runs any
other type of engram, seldom goes backtrack well, and is subject to
somatic, emotional and perceptic shut-offs, making any other type of
Dianetic or Scientology auditing a difficult activity.
Therefore if drugs, medicine or alcohol, or individual names of them
read on the meter on the Original Assessment Sheet, they are handled
FIRST AND FOREMOST .
(Note: You do not ask the pc for whole track drugs. You want only
drugs, medicine or alcohol he has taken in this lifetime.)
In New Era Dianetics the Drug Rundown has five parts: 1) The Original
Assessment in which the names of drugs, medicines or alcohol the pc has
taken in this lifetime are obtained, 2) The running of each reading
drug, medicine or alcohol Narrative R3RA Quad, 3) The preassessment of
each of these and the running by R3RA Quad of the items, 4) The prior
assessment to drugs or alcohol for each, 5) The final step of bringing
the pc fully into PT and stabilizing him by the running of further
Objectives, SOP 8C and Op Pro By Dup.
1. The Original Assessment
This has already been done as Action One. It may be necessary to get
the preclear to add to the list and it is highly possible that he has
taken more types of drugs in this lifetime than he remembered at the
time the Original Assessment was done. You have to have all drugs,
medicines and alcohol by their actual names as known to the pc. It is
not enough to use an item like "drugs," "alcohol" or "medicine" as you
will get nowhere. They have to be "heroin," or "penicillin" or
"bourbon."
2. Narrative Handling of Drugs
Before any other handling, the pc runs out EACH of the reading drugs,
medicines or alcohols Narrative R3RA Quad. This is done FIRST.
3. The Preassessment
New Era Dianetics handling for drugs includes the use of the
Preassessment List. This is a new procedure on the handling and running
of Dianetics. Previous to this you would ask the pc for attitudes,
emotions, sensations and pains connected with an item. Instead the
preassessment is done. It ensures that every somatic is gotten off in
connection with whatever you are handling. (Ref: HCOB 18 Jun 78R New
Era Dianetics Series 4R, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM).
Each item found by preassessment is run by R3RA Quad as soon as the
running item is found in every case. Then one continues with further
preassessment until all possible drugs, medicines and alcohols are
fully handled R3RA Quad.
4. The Prior Assessment
After all reading drugs, medicines and alcohols have been preassessed
and run out R3RA Quad, the prior assessment to drugs or alcohol is
done. This step locates and runs out all the feelings, attitudes,
misemotions, pains, etc. the pc had prior to first taking each drug,
medicine or alcohol. (Ref: HCOB 15 Jul 71RA III, Rev 27 Jun 78 New Era
Dianetics Series 9R, C/S Series 48RB, DRUG HANDLING).
ACTION EIGHT-A:
5. The Final Step-More Objectives
As a final step, the pc is brought fully into present time with further
Objectives: SOP 8C and then Op Pro By Dup. each run to its complete EP.
This completes the Dianetic Drug Rundown.
ACTION NINE: RELIEF RUNDOWN
Where the Original Assessment Sheet has shown losses by death or other
severe changes in a person's life such as losses of position or pets or
objects it will be found that the person's life changed for the worse
at that point.
The auditor spots these points of change either on the Original
Assessment Sheet or by asking the preclear. These points are then
handled with New Era Dianetics procedure.
.
It will be found that when all such great changes in a person's life
have been handled the person will experience a considerable relief
about life. (Ref: HCOB 3 July 1978R, NED Series 10R).
ACTION TEN: DIANETIC REMEDIES-OPTIONAL
The Picture and Masses Remedy and the Past Life Remedy are optional and
are only done when you run into trouble. They are run after the Drug
Rundown because unhandled drugs are the cause of most of that trouble.
The Picture and Masses Remedy
(Ref: HCOB 22 Jul 69 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT
HCOB 24 Jul 78 DIANETIC REMEDIES)
Past Life Remedy
(Ref: HCOB 16 Jan 75 PAST LIFE REMEDY
HCOB 24 Jul 78 DIANETIC REMEDIES)
ACTION ELEVEN: COMPLETE HANDLING ON THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
You have handled all drugs, alcohol and medicine and all losses the pc
has had fully and completely. The pc is now set up to go ahead with
handling the rest of his complaints and symptoms.
The full procedure of handling the remainder of this Original
Assessment Sheet is laid out in full in HCOB 28 July 71RA Rev 25 June
78 New Era Dianetics Series 8R DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON and HCOB 18
June 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE
ITEM. Follow these issues exactly.
ACTION TWELVE: REASSESSMENT OF THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
When all Original Assessment Sheet items are handled as above, the
Original Assessment Sheet is reassessed. The pc's memory will have
improved if you've done a good job of auditing so far and his targets
in processing will have changed.
So we reassess the Original Assessment Sheet and handle any now reading
area.
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jul 78R New Era Dianetics Series 12R, SECOND ORIGINAL
ASSESSMENT) .
ACTION THIRTEEN: DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE
This is an optional step to be taken if your pc is having any trouble
with study. It takes up and handles any and all somatics connected with
the subject of study.
A Student Rescue Intensive is not run until the pc has been completed
up to ACTION ELEVEN as it would interrupt his program because drugs, if
he has taken any, are a probable contributory cause to being unable to
study. Also the Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive is not a substitute
for proper Word Clearing of Dianetic, Scientology and earlier courses
and training. It does however make the latter much more effective.
(Ref: HCOB 2 Jul 78 New Era Dianetics Series 11, DIANETIC STUDENT
RESCUE INTENSIVE).
ACTION FOURTEEN: PREPARED ASSESSMENT FORM
This is an early step I developed in Dianetics which fell into disuse
and abandonment. However it can produce some amazing results and so is
being put back as a standard step in the running of Dianetics. It is
done by assessing a prepared list of types of somatics and fully
handling each one using New Era Dianetics.
When you have an F/Ning list and the pc is VGIs it is the end of this
step.
The procedure and list is covered on HCOB 1 Jul 78 New Era Dianetics
Series 13, DIANETICS PREPARED ASSESSMENT RUNDOWN.
ACTION FIFTEEN: DISABILITY RUNDOWN
This rundown handles anything the pc considers a disability; mental,
physical or otherwise. It handles everything from being too short to
not being able to speak Arabic or not wanting to go to parties. It
takes each disability and handles it with R3RA.
(Ref: HCOB 29 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 14, DISABILITY RUNDOWN).
ACTION SIXTEEN: IDENTITY RUNDOWN
We have never before had a Dianetic process specifically directed to
getting a pc into valence. The Identity Rundown now handles that. It
specifically takes up and handles valences the pc may be in by using
the New Era Dianetics tech.
(Ref: HCOB 20 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 15, IDENTITY RUNDOWN).
ACTION SEVENTEEN: AUDITING OUT SESSIONS-OPTIONAL
Now and then it is necessary to audit out an auditing session or all
auditing. One does this by R3RA, running the incident narrative to
erasure and only going earlier similar if it starts to grind very badly
or, if all auditing, handling it session by session as a chain.
(Ref: HCOB 23 May 69 AUDITING OUT SESSIONS
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
Issue II ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM).
IF YOU GET INTO TROUBLE
If you run into any trouble on these Dianetic steps, use the L3RF and
handle all reading items to EP. Or go to Cramming on Dianetics. (Ref: HCOB
11 April 71RC L3RF).
SUMMARY
Completing all the above steps thoroughly and completely ensuring that
all chains are run to full end phenomena is the only way you will have a
well and happy pc.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JUNE 1978R
REVISED 22 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
New Era Dianetics Series 16R
PRECLEAR CHECKLIST
INFORMATION: When a pc is ready to start Dianetics this form must be filled
out with his name and commencing date and kept in the front of the pc
folder.
It is his advanced program.
As each step of Dianetics is done, the auditor plus C/S must attest by
that step that this pc has done the step thoroughly per HCOB 22 June 1978R
New Era Dianetics Series 2R, New Era Dianetics Full PC Program Outline.
When all steps have been run and completed, the pc's Dianetic folders,
with this checklist included, get sent to the Qual Sec for full
verification and attest before the pc is allowed to attest to Dianetic Case
Completion.
After a grace period of 3 weeks after the date of this issue it will be
a commevable offense for the auditor, C/S and Qual Sec to let any pc attest
to Dianetic Case Completion without having thoroughly completed EACH step
of this checklist.
PC NAME STARTING DATE______________
ORG COMPLETION DATE ___________
AUDITOR(s)__________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Auditor C/S Qual Sec
Attest Attest Attest
STEP ONE: Original Assess
ment Sheet ________ ________ ________
STEP TWO: PTSness Handled ________ ________ ________
STEP THREE: Objective ARC ________ ________ ________
STEP FOUR: Sweat Program ________ ________ ________
STEP FIVE: Objectives (CCHs
1-10, . . . SCS on
an Object, SCS,..) ________ ________ ________
Auditor C/S Qual Sec
Attest Attest Attest
STEP SIX: Hard TRs ________ ________ ________
STEP SEVEN: Dianetic CS-1 ________ ________ ________
STEP EIGHT: Drug Rundown ________ ________ ________
STEP EIGHT-A: More Objectives
(SOP 8C and Op
Pro by Dup.) ________ ________ ________
STEP NINE: Relief Rundown ________ ________ ________
STEP TEN: (Optional) Picture
& Masses Remedy ________ ________ ________
Past Life Remedy ________ ________ ________
STEP ELEVEN: Complete Handling
on Original Assess
ment Sheet ________ ________ ________
STEP TWELVE: Second Original
Assessment Sheet ________ ________ ________
STEP THIRTEEN: (Optional) Student
Rescue Intensive ________ ________ ________
STEP FOURTEEN: Prepared Assess
ment Form ________ ________ ________
STEP FIFTEEN: Disability Rundown ________ ________ ________
STEP SIXTEEN: Identity Rundown ________ ________ ________
STEP SEVENTEEN: (Optional) Auditing
Out Sessions ________ ________ ________
STEP EIGHTEEN: After full attest
From Qual Sec-
PC DECLARE ________ ________ ________
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: lfg. dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 JUNE 1978R
REVISED 22 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Cancels BTB 24 Apr 69RA,
Remimeo Preclear Assessment Sheet)
BPI
HGC (Revisions in this type style)
All Auditors
New Era Dianetics Series 5R
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
WHEN IS THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET DONE
This Original Assessment Sheet is done as the beginning action of
Dianetics. It is done in a formal Dianetic auditing session in an auditing
room with the pc duly signed up, and in session.
WHO DOES THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
The auditor assigned to audit the preclear does the assessment. It is
included as part of the preclear's auditing time as it is valuable data
collection on the preclear's case, done with the preclear on the meter.
PURPOSE OF ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
The purpose of this form is to provide essential data regarding the
preclear to the C/S, the D of P and the auditor, and to better acquaint the
auditor with the preclear at the onset of auditing.
HOW IS THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET DONE
The assessment is done with the preclear on the meter.
The preclear is given the R-Factor that you will simply be asking him
for essential data about himself for the purpose given above.
The auditor notes down the data as the pc gives it. He does not take up
the pc's answers to the questions, except, when necessary, to make sure the
question is answered and the auditor has the facts straight. TA at start
and end of the assessment is noted, along with any TA action during the
assessment. Needle reactions to the questions are noted when the question
is given plus any needle reaction that occurs during the pc's reply.
NEATNESS OF ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
The data should be written plainly and neatly on the assessment sheet
so that it is readable, as the information is wanted. Auditor does not
delay or hold up the pc giving answers, however, while he completes admin.
WHERE DOES THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET GO WHEN COMPLETED
When completed, the Original Assessment Sheet is kept in the preclear's
folder. A note is made on the Summary Sheet of pc's folder that the
Original Assessment Sheet has been done.
___________
DATE:_______________
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
Name of pc: Age of pc:____________
Auditor: Org:_________________
TA Position at Start of
Assessment:_________________________________________
A. FAMILY:
1. Is mother living? E-Meter Reaction___________________
2. Date of Death: E-Meter Reaction___________________
3. Pc's statement of relationship with
mother:_______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
E-Meter Reaction
4. Is father living? E-Meter Reaction___________________
5. Date of Death: E-Meter Reaction___________________
6. Pc's statement of relationship with
father:________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
E-Meter Reaction
7. List brothers, sisters, and other relatives of the pc, date of death
of any and E-Meter reaction:
Relation Date of Death E-Meter Reaction
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
8. Where and with whom do you live?____________________________________
E-Meter Reaction
9. Are you currently associated with anyone who is antagonistic to
mental or spiritual treatment or Scientology?
(If yes, who?): E-Meter Reaction___________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
On questions 10 through 17 if the answer is "yes" find out who and E-Meter
reaction.
10. Is anyone actively objecting to your getting treatment?
11. Has anyone insisted you get treatment?
12. Has anyone ever objected to your getting treatment?
13. Has anyone encouraged you to get treatment?
14. Has anyone ever objected to you getting better?
15. Has anyone ever assisted you in self-betterment?
16. Does anyone not like you the way you are?
17. Has anyone tried to make you change or be different?
B. MARITAL STATUS:
1. Married_______ Single_______ No. of times Divorced
2. Pc's statement of relationship with spouse:
E-Meter Reaction
3. List any marital difficulties pc presently has:
E-Meter Reaction
4. If divorced, list reasons for divorce and pc's emotional feeling
about divorce:
E-Meter Reaction
5. List children, date of death of any child and E-Meter reaction:
Children Date of Death E-Meter Reaction
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
____________________ _____________________ _____________________
C. EDUCATION LEVEL:
State the level of schooling pc has had, university education, or
professional training:
E-Meter Reaction
D. PROFESSIONAL LIFE:
State main jobs pc has held:
Job E-Meter Reaction
E. DRUGS: (NOTE: LIST DRUGS, MEDICINE OR ALCOHOL TAKEN THIS LIFETIME
ONLY.)
1. Are you taking any drugs currently?
What Drug Date (How Long) E-Meter Reaction
Have you ever taken drugs?
What Drug Date (How Long) E-Meter Reaction
2. Are you taking any alcohol or alcoholic drink currently?
What Alcohol/
Alcoholic Drink Date (How Long) E-Meter Reaction
Have you ever taken alcohol or alcoholic drinks?
What Alcohol/
Alcoholic Drink Date (How Long) E-Meter Reaction
3. List any medicine currently or previously taken.
What When E-Meter Reaction
F. LOSSES:
What severe losses have you had in life that influenced it?
Loss Date Description E-Meter
Reaction
G. DEATHS:
What deaths have severely affected your life?
Loss Date Description E-Meter
Reaction
H. UPSETS:
Are you upset with or cross about anything or anyone at this
particular time?
Upset Date Description E-Meter
Reaction
I. DANGERS:
1. Are you in any particular danger at this time?
Description E-Meter Reaction
2. Are there engrams that match this in the past?
(Note meter read.)
J. ACCIDENTS:
List any serious accidents pc has had, the date of such, any
permanent physical
damage, and E-Meter reaction.
Accident Date Physical Damage E-Meter
Reaction
K. ILLNESSES:
List any serious illness pc has had giving date of each, any
permanent-physical damage, and E-Meter reaction.
Illness Date Physical Damage E-Meter
Reaction
L. OPERATIONS:
List any operation, the date of each and E-Meter reaction.
Operation Date E-Meter Reaction
M. PRESENT PHYSICAL CONDITION:
List any bad physical condition pc presently has and E-Meter reaction
to such.
Physical Condition E-Meter Reaction
N. PT ILLNESSES:
1. List any illnesses the pc currently has.
Illness Date E-Meter Reaction
2. Do you have any recurring physical ailment?
E-Meter Reaction
O. DISABILITY PAYMENT OR PENSION:
List any disability payment or pension received by the pc, what it is
for, how much and for how long it has been received.
How E-Meter
What For Much Duration Reaction
P. ANY FAMILY HISTORY OF INSANITY:
E-Meter
Who What When Reaction
Q. EYES: E-Meter Reaction
Any tint in eye white
Eye Color
Color Blindness
Glasses
R. BODY WEIGHT: E-Meter Reaction
Overweight?
Underweight?
S. ANY PERCEPTION DIFFICULTIES:
What E-Meter Reaction
T. ANY PERCEPTION TROUBLE IN
FAMILY: E-Meter Reaction
U. SICK OR DISABLED FAMILY: E-Meter Reaction
V. EARLIER ALLIES OR CLOSE
FRIENDS: E-Meter Reaction
W. HUSBAND OR WIFE PHYSICAL
TROUBLES:
What E-Meter Reaction
X. ATTITUDE TOWARDS ILLNESS: E-Meter Reaction
Y. ATTITUDE TOWARDS TREATMENT: E-Meter Reaction
Z. ANY CURRENT TREATMENT IN
PROGRESS: E-Meter Reaction
AA. COMPULSIONS, REPRESSIONS AND FEARS:
List any compulsions (things pc feels compelled to do), repressions
(things pc must prevent himself from doing) and any fears of pc.
Compulsions: E-Meter Reaction
Repressions: E-Meter Reaction
Fears: E-Meter Reaction
Are you trying to change something someone else doesn't like?
What and Who E-Meter Reaction
BB. CRIMINAL RECORD:
List any crime committed by pc, prison sentence, if any, and E-Meter
reactions:
Crime Sentence E-Meter Reaction
CC. INTERESTS AND HOBBIES:
List any interests and hobbies of pc.
Interests and Hobbies E-Meter Reaction
DD. ARE YOU HERE ON YOUR OWN SELF-DETERMINISM?
E-Meter Reaction
EE. PREVIOUS DIANETIC OR SCIENTOLOGY PROCESSING:
1. List auditors, hours, and E-Meter reaction to any processing done.
Auditor Hours E-Meter Reaction
2. List briefly processes run:
3. List goals attained from such processing:
E-Meter Reaction
4. List goals not attained from such processing:
E-Meter Reaction
FF. 1. Do you look on yourself as somebody else?
E-Meter Reaction
2. When you see pictures of the past do you see yourself from a
distance?
E-Meter Reaction
GG. FORMER PRACTICES:
1. What practices or treatments have you engaged upon in the past?
Practice or Therapy Date E-Meter Reaction
2. Are you continuing any of the above in the present?
HH. What problems are you trying to solve by processing?
E-Meter Reaction
II. Have you ever done anything harmful to Dianetics, Dianeticists,
Scientology, Scientologists or organizations? (Note any meter read.)
JJ. REALITY FACTOR:
You know of course that people sometimes get cross at the auditor or
run away when they are withholding information from them and we don't want
you to do that.
Anything you tell me is confidential and is protected under
ministerial confidence.
Is there anything we have missed or omitted while doing this
assessment? (Carefully note any meter reads.)
Ask: "Is there anything you would care to tell me about this?"
State of needle at the end of the above
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldv.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 JUNE 1978RA
Issue II
REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
RE-REVISED 15 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors (Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
CANCELS
HCOB 26 MAY 1978 Issue II
BTB 6 MAY 1969RA Issue II
New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
IMPORTANT: Included in the vital revisions of this bulletin are a
change in the order of R3RA com mands and additional data
on Dianetic EPs and postulates.
ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
Ref: HCOB 23 Apr 69RII DIANETIC ERASURE & HOW TO ATTAIN
HCOB 2 Dec 69R RISING TA
HCOB 28 May 69R HOW NOT TO ERASE
HCOB 23 May 69R AUDITING OUT SESSIONS NARRATIVE
VERSUS SOMATIC CHAINS
HCOB 2 Apr 69RA DIANETIC ASSISTS
HCOB t3 Sep 78 R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS AND
NARRATIVE R3RA-AN ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCE
HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
The search to unravel the mystery of the human mind was so long and so
complex that it had many turnings. Methods were changed so as to be
perfected as understanding increased in the research line. Unfortunately
this was taken advantage of by some of questionable intent. Because there
had been changes and perfecting actions they could introduce unworkable
changes that would go relatively undetected.
Probably this is the fate of all subjects and why Man is in a state of
high material cultural achievement yet does not have really workable
equipment and is in a terrible mess, surrounded on every hand by a failing
material culture.
Probably the heaviest hat I've worn in recent years is the recovery of
lost Dianetic and Scientology tech and eradicating and correcting
alterations introduced into the subject by others.
Given a knowledge of the composition and behavior of the time track,
engram running by chains is so simple that any auditor begins by
overcomplication. You almost can't get uncomplicated enough in engram
running.
In teaching people to run engrams in 1949, my chief despair was summed
up in one sentence to the group I was instructing: "All auditors talk too
much." And that's the first lesson.
The second lesson is: "All auditors acknowledge too little." Instead of
cheerily acking what the pc said and saying "Continue," auditors are always
asking for more
data and usually for more data than the pc could ever give. Example: Pc: "I
see a house here." Auditor: "Okay. How big is it?"
That's not engram running, that's just lousy "Q and A."
The proper action is: Pc: "I see a house here." Auditor: "Okay.
Continue."
The exceptions to this rule are non-existent. This isn't a special
brand of engram running. It is modern engram running. It was the first
engram running and is the latest and you can put aside any complications in
between.
The rule is ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT THE PC SAYS AND TELL HIM TO CONTINUE.
Then there's the matter of being doubtful of control. Wrong example:
Auditor: "Move to yesterday. Are you there? How do you know it's yesterday?
What do you see that makes you think...." FLUNK, FLUNK, FLUNK.
Right example: Auditor: "Move to the beginning of that incident and
tell me when you are there." (Pc answers.) "What do you see? . . . . . . .
. . . Good."
Another error is a failure to take the pc's data. You take the pc's
data. Never take his orders.
EARLY ENGRAM RUNNING
No auditor who knew earlier than June 1978 engram running should
consider he or she knows how to run engrams.
Routine 3RA is itself. It has no dependence on earlier methods of
running engrams. Failure to study and learn R3RA "because one knows about
engram running" will cause a lot of case failure.
If you know old-time engram running there is no attempt here to
invalidate you or that knowledge or make you wrong in any way. Those are
all ways to run engrams and gave you a better grasp on it. I only wish to
call to your attention that R3RA is not old-time engram running.
ROUTINE 3RA
Engram running by chains is designated "Routine 3RA."
It is a new triumph of simplicity. It does not demand visio, sonic or
other perception at once by the pc. It develops them.
R3RA REVISED BY STEPS
The first thing the auditor does is to make sure the room and session
are set up. This means, in other words, that the room is as comfortable as
possible and free from interruptions and distractions; that the auditor's
meter is fully charged and set up and that the auditor has all the
administrative supplies he will need for the session. Prepared correction
lists for Dianetics must also be included.
He has the C/S for that session.
The pc is seated in the chair furthest from the door and is asked to
pick up the cans.
The auditor checks that the pc has had enough to eat by doing the
metabolism test and also checks that the pc has the correct sensitivity
setting by having the pc squeeze
the cans and adjusting the sensitivity knob so that the needle registers
one third of a dial fall when squeezing the cans.
The auditor then starts the session by saying, "This is the session"
(Tone 40).
The auditor then puts in the R (reality) factor with the pc by telling
the pc briefly what he is going to do in the session.
PRELIMINARY STEP:
Establish the type of chain the pc is to run by assessment. Ref: HCOB
18 June 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM.
R3RA COMMANDS
FLOW 1:
STEP ONE:
Locate the first incident by the command "Locate a time when you
had_____."
STEP TWO:
"When was it?" You accept any time or date or approximation the pc
gives you. Do not attempt any dating drill.
STEP THREE:
Move the pc to the incident with the exact command, "Move to that
incident." (This step is omitted if the pc keeps telling you he is there
already.)
STEP FOUR:
"What is the duration of that incident?" Accept any duration the pc
gives you or any statement he makes about it. Do not attempt to meter him a
more accurate duration.
STEP FIVE:
Move the pc to the beginning of the incident with the exact command:
"Move to the beginning of that incident and tell me when you are there."
STEP SIX:
Ask pc what he or she is looking at with the exact command: "What do
you see?" (If the pc's eyes are open, tell the pc first, "Close your eyes,"
acknowledge him quietly for doing so and then give him the command.)
STEP SEVEN:
"Move through that incident to a point (duration pc said) later."
STEP EIGHT:
Ask nothing, say nothing, do nothing (except observe the meter or make
quiet notes) while pc is going through the incident. If pc comments before
reaching the end say "OK, continue."
STEP NINE:
When the pc reaches the end of the incident say only: "What happened?"
Take whatever pc says, acknowledge only as needful. Say nothing else, ask
nothing else. When pc has told little or much and has finished talking,
give him a final acknowledgement .
If the TA has risen (from its position at Step 1) the auditor
immediately checks for an earlier incident (Step G). If no earlier
incident, he asks for an earlier beginning to the incident (Step H).
If the TA is the same or lower, he runs the incident through again
(Step A).
In going through an incident the second or successive times one DOES
NOT ask for date and duration or any description.
A. (When the pc has told what happened and the auditor has acknowledged)
"Move to the beginning of that incident and tell me when you are
there."
B. "Move through to the end of that incident."
C. (When the pc has done so) "Tell me what happened."
Ca. "Is that incident erasing or going more solid?" (TA rising means the
incident has gone more solid so the question is unnecessary if TA is
higher.)
If the incident is erasing, go through it again (Step D).
If it has gone more solid, ask for an earlier incident (Step G) and
if no earlier incident, ask for an earlier beginning (Step H).
D. "Return to the beginning of that incident and tell me when you are
there."
E. "Move through to the end of that incident."
F. "Tell me what happened."
Fa. "Is that incident erasing or going more solid?" (TA rising means the
incident has gone more solid so the question is unnecessary if TA is
higher.)
If the incident is erasing, go through it again (Step D).
If it has gone more solid, ask for an earlier incident (Step G) and
if no earlier incident, ask for an earlier beginning (Step H).
G. "Is there an earlier incident when you had a (exact same somatic)?"
Continue on down the chain of the SAME somatic using Steps 2-9, A, B.
C, D, E, F. G. H. and EYE.
H. "Is there an earlier beginning to this incident?" or "Does the one we
are running start earlier?" or "Does there seem to be an earlier
starting point to this incident?"
(If not, give command D and put the pc through the incident again. If
there is an earlier beginning, give command EYE.)
EYE. "Go to the new beginning of that incident and tell me when you are
there." (Followed by B. C.)
POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
When it appears that you have reached the basic incident of the chain
and that it is erasing, after each pass through, ask:
"Has it erased?"
The pc sometimes thinks the incident is erasing but it's not erasing,
so you have to go back to your G. H. EYE followed by 2-9, A-EYE. In some
cases this can happen several times in one chain.
The postulate coming off is the EP of the chain and means that you have
obtained an erasure. This will be accompanied by F/N and VGIs.
Getting the postulate is the important thing. Even if you get an F/N
you don't call the F/N UNTIL you've gotten the postulate, at which time you
have reached the EP and end off on that chain.
If the pc says the chain has erased, but the postulate made during the
time of the incident has not been volunteered by the pa ask:
"Did you make a postulate at the time of that incident?"
Only when the postulate has come off to F/N and VGIs can one consider
that the full EP of a Dianetic incident or chain has been reached.
You must recognize what the postulate is when it comes up. If you
overrun past the postulate you can really mess a pc up and he may need
extensive repair. All you're trying to get off the line is the postulate.
That is what is keeping the chain there.
If the pc has given the postulate to F/N and VGIs, that is it. You have
the EP of that chain.
GOING EARLIER
Ordinarily one runs an incident through twice, (Steps 1-9 then A-C), to
unburden it and allow the pa to locate earlier incidents on the chain.
However, the TA rising on Step 9 is an indication that there is
something earlier. If the auditor observes the TA rising, he should ask the
pc if there is an earlier incident, using in the command the exact same
somatic or feeling used in Step One. If there is no earlier incident he
asks if there is an earlier beginning.
An auditor should never solidify a pays bank by putting him through an
incident TWICE, when by observation of the TA it is c/ear that the incident
has gone more solid by the end of the FIRST run through.
Checking for an earlier incident after the first run through (if the TA
has risen) is the solution to this.
If, after the second pass through, when you have asked the pc "Is the
incident erasing or going more solid?" and the pc doesn't know or isn't
sure, ask for an earlier incident.
Never ask erasing/solid in the middle of an incident.
BOUNCERS
If the pc is out of the session, out of the incident, bounces from the
incident, etc., you would have to have him or her RETURN to the beginning
of the incident and move through the incident, returning the pc to the
incident as necessary.
The pc who bounces out of an incident on a "bouncer" has to be put back
into the incident and continue running it.
The commands to do this are: As soon as you have seen that the pc has
bounced give him command D ("Return to the beginning of that incident and
tell me when you are there."), followed with E, F. Fa.
FLOWS 2, 3 AND 0
Step One and Step G (going earlier) commands for Flows 2, 3 and 0 are:
FLOW 2:
STEP ONE:
"Locate an incident of your causing another_____ (the exact somatic
or feeling used in Flow 1)."
STEP G:
"Is there an earlier incident of your causing another_____ (the exact
somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)?"
FLOW 3:
STEP ONE:
"Locate an incident of others causing others_____ (plural of the
somatic or feeling used in Flow 1). "
STEP G:
"Is there an earlier incident of others causing others_____(plural of
the exact somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)?"
FLOW 0:
STEP ONE:
"Locate an incident of you causing yourself_____(the exact somatic or
feeling used in Flow 1)."
STEP G:
"Is there an earlier incident of you causing yourself_____(the exact
somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)?"
Each of these Step One and Step G commands are run on the full verbatim
1-9, A-EYE steps as given herein.
NARRATIVE R3RA
A narrative item is often run to run out the physical experiences the
person has just undergone. This could be for example an accident, illness,
an operation or emotional shock.
However, a condition or circumstance without an incident is NOT
narrative. It's just an incorrect item. An example of this would be trying
to run the item, "Obstruction of justice." It would not run as there is no
exact incident there.
Narratives are too often just run through once or twice and abandoned.
This, unfortunately, leaves the incident still charged and affecting the
pc. A narrative needs to
be run and run and run on that one incident. What you are doing is running
the incident narrative to erasure and only going earlier similar if it
starts to grind very badly.
Most narratives will run out by themselves without going earlier even
though it takes a very long time but if you want to change somebody's life,
that's how you can do it.
When you are running a narrative you always add the known incident to
the command.
Using the earlier beginning command in running narratives is essential.
For example: If the pc is running out a death of somebody closely related
to him you will find that the incident actually started when he heard the
phone ring, then, going back earlier to when somebody looked at him
peculiarly, etc.
So using the earlier beginning command in narrative running is VITAL.
The commands for Narrative are:
FLOW 1:
STEP ONE:
"Return to the time you______(specific incident) and tell me when you
are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pa to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pa to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use steps D, E, F making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pa is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
FLOW 2:
STEP ONE:
"Return to the time you caused another to/a (specific incident) and
tell me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time . . .").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pa to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use Steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pa is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earner similar incident?"
FLOW 3:
STEP ONE:
"Return to the time others caused others to/a (specific incident) and tell
me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pa to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
FLOW 0:
STEP ONE:
"Return to the time you caused yourself to/a (specific incident) and
tell me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pa to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pc to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
SECONDARIES
Secondaries are run with the same commands as R3RA. If they are
narrative secondaries they are run with the same commands as Narrative R3RA
engrams.
The earlier similar command is "Is there an earlier similar incident?"
ALWAYS RUN NARRATIVE INCIDENTS TRIPLE OR QUAD FLOW AS ABOVE.
AUDITOR KNOWLEDGE OF COMMANDS
These commands and procedures as given above must be thoroughly drilled
with TR 101, 102, 103 and 104 before any Dianetic auditing may be done on a
pc.
Pcs can be messed up by incorrect and sloppy commands.
SPEED OF COMMANDS
Some pcs run fast and some run slow. An auditor must never rush a pc or
hold him up when he is ready to go on with the next command. The auditor
must never keep a pc waiting for him while he handles his admin or comm
lags before giving the next command.
Timing and speed are especially crucial when the auditor gives the
command to move through the incident after having told the pc to move to
the beginning of the incident. With a slow command, the pc would wind up
halfway through the incident before he receives the command to move through
it.
The better an auditor knows his TRs, his process commands, his meter
and admin the faster and more accurately he can operate. Speed is very
important, especially when auditing fast pcs.
PC INTEREST
In doing R3RA it is necessary that (a) one chooses things the pc is
interested in and (b) one does not force a pc to run things he is
protesting being run on.
LAST INCIDENT FOUND
If you ask if there is an earlier beginning and you have already
checked for an earlier incident and the pc says there is no earlier
beginning, you do not just walk off from the one he was just running. You
send the pc through it again and it will erase with full end phenomena or
the pc will then be able to see an earlier incident and continue with the
chain.
COMPLETING CHAINS
If you do sloppy R3RA and do one thing after another without getting
the full EP of:
1) the actual postulate WHICH WILL BE THE ERASURE,
2) F/N,
3) VGIs,
you will get the pc stuck up on the track. You complete each chain to full
EP as above, remembering that when the postulate comes off, THAT is your
EP. The chain will have blown.
F/Ns
In running Dianetics you do not stop at the first sign of an F/N, you
do not call F/Ns during the running. Dianetics runs only by asking the pc
if it is erasing. You ignore F/Ns until the postulate has come off to F/N
and VGIs. THEN you call the F/N and that's it for that chain.
BLOWING BY INSPECTION
An auditor may occasionally encounter a pc who erases chains before he
can even tell about them. Along about Step 3 of R3RA, the TA blows down,
the needle F/Ns, the pc says, "It's gone," and VGIs come in. This is called
blowing by inspection and occurs once in a while with a fast running pc on
a light chain.
If it was basic for that chain and the auditor fails to recognize and
handle it, the pc will go into another chain or a heavy protest.
ENDING SESSION
An R3RA session can be safely ended on a completed chain that ended
with the full Dianetic EP as above stated....
This doesn't mean the end of all Dianetic auditing. In the next session
another assessment will turn up more unwanted feelings, etc.
ENDING DIANETICS
Dianetics is ended off only when a pc has become well and happy and
remains that way.
And there you have it, engram running superior to any engram running
ever done and giving superior and faster results.
SPECIAL NEW ERA DIANETICS RUNDOWN
FOR OTs
New Era Dianetics or any Dianetics is NOT to be run on Clears or above
or on Dianetic Clears.
Clears and OTs are to be audited on the Special New Era Dianetics
Rundown for OTs, which is available at Advanced Orgs and Flag. (Ref: HCOB
12 Sep 78 Dianetics Forbidden on Clears and OTs.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.mdf
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JUNE 1978RA
Remimeo REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
All Auditors RE-REVISED 15 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
New Era Dianetics Series 7RA
IMPORTANT: Included in the vital revisions of this Bulletin is a
change in the order of R3RA commands.
R3RA COMMANDS
This is a short list on R3RA commands.
STEP 1: "Locate a time when you had_______ ."
STEP 2: "When was it?" (Note: You accept any time or date or
approximation the pc gives you. Do not attempt any dating drill.)
STEP 3: "Move to that incident." (This step is omitted if the pc keeps
telling you he is there already.)
STEP 4: "What is the duration of that incident?" (Accept any duration
the pc gives you or any statement he makes about it. Do not attempt
to meter him a more accurate duration.)
STEP 5: "Move to the beginning of that incident and tell me when you
are there."
STEP 6: "What do you see?" (If the pc's eyes are open, tell the pc
first, "Close your eyes," acknowledge him quietly for doing so and
then give him the command.)
STEP 7: "Move through that incident to a point (duration pc said)
later."
STEP 8: If pc comments before reaching the end say "OK, continue."
STEP 9: When pc has reached the end of the incident ask "What
happened?"
If the TA has risen (from its position at Step 1) the auditor
immediately checks for an earlier incident (Step G). If no earlier
incident, he asks for an earlier beginning to the incident (Step H).
If the TA is the same or lower, he runs the incident through again
(Step A).
In going through an incident the second or successive times one DOES
NOT ask for date and duration or any description.
A. (When the pa has told what happened and the auditor has
acknowledged) "Move to the beginning of that incident and tell me
when you are there."
B. "Move through to the end of that incident."
C. (When the pa has done so) "Tell me what happened."
Ca. "Is that incident erasing or going more solid?" (TA rising
means the: incident has gone more solid so the question is
unnecessary if TA is higher.)
If the incident is erasing, go through it again (Step D).
If it has gone more solid, ask for an earlier incident (Step G) and
if no earlier incident, ask for an earlier beginning (Step H).
D. "Return to the beginning of that incident and tell me when you
are there."
E. "Move through to the end of that incident."
F. "Tell me what happened."
Fa. "Is that incident erasing or going more solid?" (TA rising
means the incident has gone more solid so the question is
unnecessary if TA is higher.)
If the incident is erasing, go through it again (Step D).
If it has gone more solid, ask for an earlier incident (Step G) and
if no earlier incident, ask for an earlier beginning (Step H).
G. "Is there an earlier incident when you had a (exact same
somatic)?"
Continue on down the chain of the SAME somatic using Steps 2-9, A, B.
C, D, E, F. G. H and EYE.
H. "Is there an earlier beginning to this incident?" or "Does the
one we are running start earlier?" or "Does there seem to be an
earlier starting point to this incident?"
(If not, give command D and put the pc through the incident again. If
there is an earlier beginning, give command EYE.)
EYE. "Go to the new beginning of that incident and tell me when you are
there." (Followed by B. C.)
When it appears that you have reached the basic incident of the chain
and that it is erasing, after each pass through, ask:
"Has it erased?"
The pc sometimes thinks the incident is erasing but it's not erasing,
so you have to go back to your G. H. EYE, followed by 2-9, A-EYE. In some
cases this can happen several times in one chain.
POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
The postulate coming off is the EP of the chain and means that you have
obtained an erasure. This will be accompanied by F/N and VGIs.
Getting the postulate is the important thing. Even if you get an F/N
you don't call the F/N UNTIL you've gotten the postulate, at which time you
have reached the EP and end off on that chain.
If the pc says the chain has erased, but the postulate made during the
time of the incident has not been volunteered by the pc ask:
"Did you make a postulate at the time of that incident?"
Only when the postulate has come off to F/N and VGIs can one consider
that the full EP of a Dianetic incident or chain has been reached.
You must recognize what the postulate is when it comes up. If you overrun
past the postulate you can really mess a pa up and he may need extensive
repair. All you're trying to get off the line is the postulate. That is
what is keeping the chain there.
If the pc has given the postulate to F/N and VGIs, that is it. You have
the EP of that chain.
GOING EARLIER
Ordinarily one runs an incident through twice, (Steps 1-9 then A-C), to
unburden it and allow the pc to locate earlier incidents on the chain.
However, the TA rising on Step 9 is an indication that there is
something earlier. If the auditor observes the TA rising, he should ask the
pc if there is an earlier incident, using in the command the exact same
somatic or feeling used in Step One. If there is no earlier he asks if
there is an earlier beginning.
An auditor should never solidify a pc's bank by putting him through an
incident TWICE, when by observation of the TA it is c/ear that the incident
has gone more solid by the end of the FIRST run through.
Checking for an earlier incident after the first run through (if the TA
has risen) is the solution to this.
If, after the second pass through, when you have asked the pc "Is the
incident erasing or going more solid?" and the pc doesn't know or isn't
sure, ask for an earlier incident.
Never ask erasing/solid in the middle of an incident.
BOUNCERS
If the pc is out of the session, out of the incident, bounces from the
incident, etc. you would have to have him or her RETURN to the beginning of
the incident and move through the incident, returning the pc to the
incident as necessary.
The pc who bounces out of an incident on a "bouncer" has to be put back
into the incident and continue running it.
The commands to do this are: As soon as you have seen that the pc has
bounced give him command D ("Return to the beginning of that incident and
tell me when you are there."), followed with E, F. Fa.
FLOWS 2, 3 AND 0
FLOW 2:
STEP ONE: "Locate an incident of your causing another_____(the exact
somatic or feeling in Flow 1)."
STEP G: "Is there an earlier incident of your causing another_____(the
exact somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)?"
FLOW 3:
STEP ONE: "Locate an incident of others causing others _____(plural of
the somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)."
STEP G.: "Is there an earlier incident of others causing
others_____ (plural of the exact somatic or feeling used in Flow
1)?"
FLOW 0:
STEP ONE: "Locate an incident of you causing yourself_____(the exact
somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)."
STEP G: "Is there an earlier incident of you causing yourself_____(the
exact somatic or feeling used in Flow 1)?"
The commands for Narrative are:
FLOW 1:
STEP ONE: "Return to the time you (specific incident) and tell me when
you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pc to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use Steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
FLOW 2:
STEP ONE: "Return to the time you caused another to/a (specific incident)
and tell me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time.... ").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pc to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use Steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
FLOW 3:
STEP ONE: "Return to the time others caused others to/a (specific
incident) and tell me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the incident.
If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident (Step
EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pc to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use Steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
FLOW 0:
STEP ONE: "Return to the time you caused yourself to (specific incident)
and tell me when you are there."
Steps 2-9 are followed (3 is omitted as you have already got the pc to
the incident by giving him the first command, "Return to the time....").
Earlier beginning (Step H) is checked after each run through the
incident. If there is one, send the pc to the new beginning of the incident
(Step EYE) then follow with Steps B and C.
If there is no earlier beginning, return the pc to the incident with
Step A, followed by B and C, again checking earlier beginning (Step H) at
the end of each run through the incident. On third and subsequent runs
through the incident use Steps D, E, F. making certain to check for earlier
beginning after each pass through, and only when the pc is obviously
starting to grind and gets no place does one then use the command, "Is
there an earlier similar incident?"
SECONDARIES
Secondaries are run with the same commands as R3RA. If they are
narrative secondaries they are run with the same commands as Narrative R3RA
engrams.
The earlier similar command is "Is there an earlier similar incident?"
ALWAYS RUN NARRATIVE INCIDENTS TRIPLE OR QUAD FLOW AS ABOVE.
Auditors must be thoroughly drilled on these commands until they have
them down cold using TR 101, 102, 103 and 104.
This must be done before the auditor audits the pc on Dianetics.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JUNE 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
New Era Dianetics Series 14
DISABILITY RUNDOWN
This rundown is done by getting the pc to give you anything he
considers a disability, mental, physical or otherwise.
This list can include anything from a withered foot to being too small
to not being able to learn French.
Make a list of all items the pc gives you ensuring you get the meter
read as the pc gives you the item.
Take the largest reading item and do a full preassessment on it. Check
interest and handle each reading item from the preassessment Quad R3RA.
Take up the next biggest reading disability and do a preassessment and
handling on it.
Reassess/add to the original list. Use Suppress and Invalidate buttons
as needed.
When you have exhausted the list of all reading disabilities and the pc
says there are no more disabilities this rundown is complete.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 JULY 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 13
THE DIANETIC PREPARED ASSESSMENT RUNDOWN
ACTION FOURTEEN
Many chains, locks, secondaries and engrams are available on any pc.
But some of them are beyond the pc's reality and ability and some of them
are too featherweight to get any case gain. This rundown is designed to
locate items that can be run R3RA. It is called the Dianetic Prepared
Assessment Rundown.
EARLIER ASSESSMENT DONE
The very earliest assessment (1948) used was "What the pc could see"
when he closed his or her eyes. This was then run.
This was followed by an arbitrary method of assigning necessary
incidents to be run such as birth and prenatals.
The next earliest assessment (1949) was to ask each time for "the
incident necessary to resolve the case." An automaticity known as the "File
Clerk" was depended upon, impinged on by finger snapping.
The next period (1951) concerned whole track exploration running
whatever you could get to read on a meter.
The next period (1952) concerned overt engrams located by what the pc
seemed to be doing physically.
This ended the Dianetic period when engrams were run to clear a case.
Variations of these assessments were revived from time to time in
Dianetic uses, culminating in the 5th ACC where overt engrams were run with
confront and great stress was laid on getting the postulates out of them.
The meter and shrewd guesses played their part in assessments.
Significance and story content have no bearing on the rightness or
wrongness of a chain selected. They are entirely incidental to judging the
correctness of a chain.
1. The first action of this RD is to assess the following list:
infirmity ________
sickness ________
being unwell ________
bad feelings ________
unpleasant feelings ________
disagreeable feelings ________
soreness ________ panic ________
hurting ________ apprehension ________
ailment ________ qualms ________
complaint ________ alarm ________
a malady ________ timidity ________
a disorder ________ physical disabilities ________
damaged body parts ________ casualty ________
hurt body parts ________ distress ________
disabled body parts ________ bodily affliction ________
skin irritation ________ defective body parts ________
skin disorder ________ allergies ________
unwanted feelings ________ relatives ________
dental problems ________ jobs ________
an unwanted body condition ________ environment ________
unwanted states of the body ________ this area ________
an unwanted manner ________ upsets ________
depression ________ problems ________
infection ________ children ________
unwanted behavior ________ marriage ________
injuries ________ smells ________
mishap ________ machinery ________
perception troubles ________ matter ________
loss of a loved one ________ energy ________
impulses ________ space ________
crimes ________ time ________
urges ________ orgs ________
restraints ________ Dianetics ________
frights ________ Scientology ________
anxiety ________ auditors ________
terror ________ auditing ________
horror ________ preclears ________
2. You then take an item found as above and ask the pc to describe
it briefly. Ask him, "In your own words briefly describe (item that
read)."
3. Use the exact wording the pc gave you in 2. Treat that wording as an
original item exactly as though it had been obtained on the Original
Assessment List NED Series 5.
4. Handle the items in 3 above exactly as you would handle any original
item or items in NED Series 4 (Assessment and How to Get the Item).
5. Exhaust all reading items on the above prepared list.
6. Reassess the prepared list and do 2 to 5 above.
7. When this prepared list no longer gives reads and only F/Ns you have
finished Action Fourteen.
L3RE
If you run into any trouble an L3RE should be done immediately.
Done correctly, with standard R3RA and flawless metering the gains from
this rundown will not be small.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
(Cancels BTB 9 Aug 1970R, Rev 10 June t974,
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive.)
New Era Dianetics Series 11
DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive. This is an optional step to be taken
if your pc is having any trouble with study.
The steps are very simple:
1. Assess: Being Trained Stress
Being Educated Education
Study Schools
Learning Teachers
Examination Enforcement
Misunderstoods
for best read.
2. Do a preassessment on the largest reading item from Step 1.
3. Find the running item, using standard preassessment procedure (ref.
NED Series 4).
4. Run out the item you have found in Step 3 R3RA Quad.
5. Repeat the preassessment on the original item found in Step 1, and
repeat the following steps 3 and 4 on that item.
6. Continue reassessing the Preassessment List on the original item and
running out R3RA Quad the best reading running item until there are no
further reads on the preassessment of that original item.
The intensive should be concluded when the pc is now happy about study.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JULY 1978R
REVISED 22 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
New Era Dianetics Series 10R
RELIEF RUNDOWN
Where the Original Assessment Sheet has shown losses by death or other
severe changes in a person's life such as losses of position or pets or
objects it will be found that the person's life changed for the worse at
that point. (See Sections F. G. H. and I of HCOB 24 June 78R New Era
Dianetics Series 5R Original Assessment Sheet.)
The auditor spots these points of change either on the Original
Assessment Sheet or by asking the preclear. These points are then run
Narrative R3RA Quad.
If the Narrative R3RA Quad does not clean it up fully one goes to the
preassessment step of New Era Dianetics Series 4R and carries on from
there, but do not do this until the narrative is fully handled.
In running such incidents narrative it will be found that the clue to
erasure lies in locating earlier beginnings each time the pc has been moved
through the incident. It will be found that the pc finds earlier and
earlier moments when he received the information that then built up to a
catastrophe. This can even go back to a dream or a telepathic awareness or
a premonition that the incident was going to occur. Narrative erasures
often depend utterly on finding, after each run through, if there was any
earlier beginning.
If the incident starts to grind (no change of TA or content) despite
having repeatedly searched for an earlier beginning only then do you go
into an earlier narrative incident but do so with caution as most
narratives expertly run will erase all by themselves and running a chain of
deaths for instance can go back an awfully long way.
When all such great changes in a person's life have been found and
erased the person should experience a considerable sense of relief about
life.
If he does not, then treat the narrative, even though handled as a
narrative, as an original item and preassess it to find other running items
connected with it and treat it with R3RA full handling. Also do this if the
narrative grinds and there is trouble going earlier.
Narrative chains properly run produce dramatic and miraculous case
changes.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb.nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JULY 1978R
REVISED 22 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
(Cancels HCOB 16 April 1969, HEALTH FORM, USE OF, and PASTORAL
COUNSELING HEALTH FORM, Revised 22 July 69 and HCOB 19 May 1969,
HEALTH FORM, USE OF, A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF AUDITING.)
Ref: HCOB 24 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 5R
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
HCOB 25 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 8R
DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
HCOB 18 Jun 78R New Era Dianetics Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 7RA
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
New Era Dianetics Series 12R
SECOND ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT
At the point in the New Era Dianetics Program, when the pc has fully
completed his Drug Rundown and handled the items on the Original Assessment
Sheet, the Original Assessment Sheet is REDONE.
The Second Original Assessment Sheet gives a comparison. The somatics
and pains not mentioned in the second assessment can be considered to be
gone.
A second form done gives the auditor and the C/S an indication of the
actual improvement.
Additionally, the pc's memory will have improved if you've done a good
job of auditing.
So we reassess the Original Assessment Sheet and handle any additional
items which come up.
In assessing this list the second time, mark SECOND ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT
across the top of the sheet.
It is important to give your pc an R-Factor at this stage so he'll not
feel invalidated by doing this form again.
Let him know that you will be asking him questions from the Original
Assessment Sheet for the purpose of picking up any new items which he may
now remember and to make sure you've handled all the charge on the items
you have already taken up. Ask him to answer each question as fully as he
can even if he has already given the information in a previous session.
Handle the items on the Second Original Assessment according to the
directions for handling the Original Assessment Sheet, HCOB 24 June 1978R
New Era Dianetics Series 5R, THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo
Dianetic Crse HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JULY 1978
Dianetic CANCELS
Interne Sups HCOB 18 MARCH 78
Class VIII POSTULATES AND ENGRAMS
Auditors
DIANETIC F/Ns
An F/N seen by the auditor in running R3RA is NOT called. It simply
means that the pc is running well.
An auditor running R3RA is NOT looking for F/Ns. He is looking for
total, complete erasure of the basic of a chain.
In running R3RA one has to CONSULT THE PC! This is part of R3RA
commands.
An F/N can occur five or more engrams before basic is reached! You just
go on with R3RA. Only when the pc says the engram has totally erased, when
he has cognited, is VGIs and the postulate in the basic has come off do you
consider the chain complete.
The E-Meter will have been F/Ning for some time.
When the full end phenomena of a Dianetic chain is obtained, the needle
will of course be F/Ning. The F/N simply broadens.
The auditor does not call F/Ns when running Dianetics until the fu/l EP
of the chain is reached.
1) When it appears that you have reached the basic incident of the
chain and that it is erasing, after each pass through the auditor
asks, "Has it erased?"
2) The meter will have been F/Ning for some time.
3) When the pc has stated that it has erased the auditor should
also expect a cognition volunteered by the pc.
4) The auditor should expect to see very good indicators (VGIs).
5) If no postulate made during the time of the incident has come
off and been volunteered by the pc the auditor should ask, "Did you
make a postulate at the time of that incident?" Note that the
postulate may have come off in the form of a cognition and on the
other hand may not have even though a cognition was given.
Only when these latter steps have occurred can one consider that the EP
of a Dianetic incident or chain has been obtained.
POWER F/Ns
F/Ns are disregarded in Power.
Each Power Process has its own end phenomena and is ended only when
that is obtained.
LRH:lfg L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (g) 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JULY 1978R
REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
Dianetics (Cancels HCOB 9 May 1969 Case Supervisor
Checksheet Forms and Section "Dianetic CS-1" of BTB 8 Jan
Auditors 71R. Rev 18.6.74. Auditing CS-1 for Dianetics
C/Ses and Scientology and BTB 28 April 74R. Dia
Supers netics, Clearing Lists and R3R)
DIANETIC CS-1
The Dianetic CS-1 is for new, unaudited pcs or for old pcs who have
misunderstoods, who try to be psychoanalytic cases or who don't catch on.
The Dianetic CS-1 is done on the pc's auditing time.
It is done to give the pc the necessary data and R-Factor on basics and
Dianetic procedure so he fully understands and is able and willing to be
audited successfully.
The auditor should know his materials very well and should have a Tech
Dictionary, his HCOB pack, a regular but simple dictionary in the language
being audited, ready in the CS-I session for reference and for clearing up
any misunderstoods or questions the pc may have.
A) To clear the various Dianetic terms, use the Definitions Sheet
attached to this issue (Attachment No. 1), where the definitions have been
taken from the glossary at the back of the book Dianetics Today and from
the Tech Dictionary.
Also make full use of the Tech Dictionary, Dianetics Picture Book, plus
BTB 11 Dec 69R "Dianetic Illustrations" and other references listed at the
end of this issue.
If further references are needed, ensure you use source materials.
B) When the pc has read and grasped the definition of a Dianetic term
have him give you the definition in his own words and if necessary have him
give you sentences using it correctly. Have him give you examples-"real
life" examples where possible, using his experiences or those of friends or
relatives. Have him demonstrate the word or item, using a demo kit.
C) Lists of the words used in R3RA commands, the preassessment, the
L3RE, etc. are also included at the end of this issue (Attachment No. 2).
To clear these words, use the CS-1 Definitions Sheet attached as it
applies or a good (not dinky) dictionary, such as one of the Thorndike
Barnhart editions.
D) Check for any questions (or misunderstoods) as you go along and
ensure any such get handled so the pc winds up with a clear understanding
of the word, item or procedure.
Do not settle for glibness that does not show understanding but, on the
other hand, do not overrun or put duress on the pc.
Ensure that each word cleared on the pc is taken to F/N.
DIANETIC CS- 1 PROCEDURE:
1. Clear the word: Dianetics.
2. Clear the words: a) thetan b) mind c) body. Have the pc use the demo
kit to ensure the pc gets the relationship between these (as well as
using the above references).
3. Now clear the words: a) picture b) mental image picture c) reactive
mind d) bank. Ensure you include pc doing a demo to show that the
reactive mind or bank is made up of pictures.
4. Clear the words: a) auditing b) auditing session c) preclear d)
auditor.
5. Clear with the pc:
a) the communication cycle. Get the pc to give you examples he has
observed.
b) the auditing comm cycle.
Get the pc to explain the difference between a comm cycle and the
auditing comm cycle. Have him demonstrate it.
You can also ask him questions like: "Have you eaten dinner?" (or
breakfast or lunch) and when he replies, ask "What did you do when
I asked you that question?"
6. Work with TRs on the pc until he has a good idea of auditing.
7. Clear the words: a) charge b) mental mass.
8. Go over with the pc what the meter does (registers interest and
charge/mental mass) .
For demonstrations, you can do a "pinch test" where you explain to
the pc that to show him how the meter registers mental mass you will
give him a pinch as part of the demonstration. Then get him to think of
the pinch (while he is holding the cans) showing him the meter reaction
and explaining how it registers mental mass.
9. Define: floating needle.
In Dianetics the auditor will only indicate the F/N when full end
phenomena has been reached.
10. Define: a) lock b) secondary c) engram.
Ensure pc understands each and how these three differ.
Use the Dianetics Picture Book, HCOB 23 Apr 69R "Dianetics Basic
Definitions" and BTB 11 Dec 69R, "Dianetic Illustrations." Get
examples. Use demo kit as necessary.
11. Define: incident.
Have the pc give you examples.
12. Define: duration.
Have the pc demonstrate duration, using a demo kit.
13. Define: chain. Use examples. Get the pc to demonstrate a chain, using
a demo kit.
14. Define: erasure.
For demonstration, have the pc draw something on a piece of paper and
then have him fully erase it with an eraser.
15. Define: postulate.
Have the pc give you some examples of a postulate. Then have him give
you an example of at least one time when he postulated something and
got it.
16. Define: cognition.
Have the pc give you some examples of a cognition.
17. a) Clear the word: flow. b) Clear each of the Flows 1, 2, 3, 0. c)
Have the pc give examples and demonstrations of each.
18. Take up Routine 3RA.
a) Clear each word of each command of the R3RA procedure. (See
attached Word List.)
b) Ensure the pc understands:
(1) "erasing." For demonstration, have the pc draw something
with pencil on a piece of paper. Then have him erase parts of
it (not the whole).
(2) "going more solid." For demonstration, have the pc draw
something with pencil on a piece of paper. Then have him make
what he has drawn more solid. again using the pencil to do so.
When the above demonstrations have been done, you can also get the
pc to demonstrate "erasing" and "going more solid" for you with a demo
kit.
c) Tell the preclear that you and he will do a demonstration so he
will get a reality on how the Dianetic R3RA procedure works in
auditing.
d) Have the preclear put the cans down and pinch his right arm.
Then tell the preclear "Locate a time you had a pinching feeling in
your right arm." Continue with steps 2 through 9, A to F of R3RA,
erasing/solid and earlier incidents, etc., clearing each step.
e) After each step of R3RA ask the preclear "What did you do?" so
that he gets the idea of how R3RA is run. Don't overdo this but
ensure the preclear understands what is required of him at each
step.
19. Clear briefly with the pc the fact you will be getting data from him
on his background on the Original Assessment Sheet, and later on the
Second Original Assessment Sheet.
(Do NOT ask the preclear questions from this or any other sheet or
list.)
20. a) Give him a brief R-Factor on doing the preassessment. Let him
know he will be giving you items for the preassessment, but do NOT
get into ANY listing at this point.
b) Clear the Preassessment List words. (See Attachment No. 2.)
21. a) Give pc the R-Factor that if at any time there is any
difficulty in the Dianetic auditing, you will be using a prepared
assessment list (L3RE) to find and handle the exact difficulty.
b) Ensure he understands that when you are assessing a
prepared list he sits quietly holding the cans while you call the
list and take meter reads to locate the difficulty.
c) Clear each word on the attached L3RE Word List. (Attachment No.
2.)
22. a) Give the pc an R-Factor on the Examiner and the fact that he
will go to the Examiner immediately after each auditing session.
Ensure he understands the Examiner says nothing to the preclear at
that time, only recording what the pc says and noting down the tone
arm position and state of the needle.
Ensure he also understands the Examiner is the person he sees if he
wishes to make any sort of statement regarding his case or if there
is something he wants handled regarding his case.
b) Clear: Examiner.
23. Turn the folder in to the C/S.
This CS-1 can usually be completed in one session. If it is done in
more than one, the session should be ended off at the end of a step or
completion of a word or demonstration-never in the middle.
Make sure you do not leave your preclear with a misunderstood or
confusion.
This CS-1 will result in huge wins for any preclear whether new or
previously audited.
The following are SOME of the references the auditor should be very
familiar with:
Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health (Book)
Scientology Picture Book (Book)
HCOB 23 Apr 69R DIANETICS BASIC DEFINITIONS
BTB 11 Dec 69R DIANETIC ILLUSTRATIONS
The Basic Auditing Series Bulletins (Tech Volume IX)
New Era Dianetics Series 1 through 18
HCOB 15 May 63 THE TIME TRACK-ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS- BULLETIN 1
HCOB 8 Jun 63R THE TIME TRACK-ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS- BULLETIN 2
HCOB 7 Jun 78 DIANETIC F/Ns
Tech Dictionary (Book)
E-Meter Essentials (Book)
Dianetics Today (Book)
NOTE: Also see Attachments No. 1 and No. 2 at the back of this
Bulletin.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb.ldv.dr
Copyright O 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCOB 9.7. 78R
Rev 4.9.78
Attachment No. 1
DIANETIC CS-1
DEFINITIONS SHEET
The following definitions have been taken from the glossary of the book
DIANETICS TODAY and from the Technical Dictionary.
DIANETICS: Man's most advanced school of the mind. From the Greek dia.
through, and noos, soul, thus "through soul" or "through
thought."
THETAN: From THETA (life static), a word taken from the Greek symbol
or letter: theta, traditional symbol for thought or spirit. The
thetan is the individual himself-not the body or the mind. The
thetan is the "I"; one doesn't have or own a thetan; one is a
thetan.
MIND: A control system between the thetan and the physical universe.
It is not the brain. The mind is the accumulated recordings of
thoughts, conclusions, decisions, observations and perceptions
of a thetan throughout his entire existence. The thetan can and
does use the mind in handling life and the physical universe.
BODY: The organized physical composition or substance of an animal
or man whether living or dead. It can also mean a grouping or
gathering, or any whole of anything.
PICTURE: An exact likeness; image. A mental image.
MENTAL IMAGE Mental pictures, facsimiles and mock-ups; a copy of one's
per
PICTURES: ceptions of the physical universe sometime in the past.
REACTIVE MIND: Reactive bank. The portion of the mind which works on a
stimulus-response basis (given a certain stimulus it will
automatically give a certain response) which is not under a
person's volitional control and which exerts force and
power over a person's awareness, purposes, thoughts, body
and actions. It consists of locks, secondaries, engrams and
chains of them and is the single source of human aberration
and psychosomatic ills.
BANK: Reactive bank; reactive mind; engram bank. The mental image
picture collection of the preclear. It comes from computer tech
nology where all data is in a "bank"; portion of the mind which
contains engrams, secondaries and locks.
AUDITING: Processing, the application of Dianetic or Scientology
processes
and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. The exact
definition of auditing is: the action of asking a preclear a
question (which he can understand and answer), getting an
answer to that question and acknowledging him for that
answer.
AUDITING 1. a precise period of time during which the auditor listens
to
SESSION: the preclear's ideas about himself.
2. a period in which an auditor and preclear are in a
quiet place where they will not be disturbed. The
auditor gives the preclear certain and exact commands
which the preclear can follow.
PRECLEAR: From pre-Clear, a person not yet Clear;
generally a person
being audited, who is thus on the road to Clear; a person who,
through Dianetic and Scientology processing, is finding out
more about himself and life.
AUDITOR: A person trained and qualified in applying Dianetics and/or
Scientology processes and procedures to individuals for their
betterment; called an auditor because auditor means "one who
listens." An auditor is a minister of the Church of Scientology.
COMMUNICATION A completed communication, including origination of the
com
CYCLE: munication, receipt of the communication, and answer or ac
knowledgement of the communication. A communication cycle
consists of just: cause, distance, effect, with intention, atten
tion, duplication and understanding.
AUDITING This is the auditing comm cycle that is always in use:
COMM CYCLE:
1) is the pc ready to receive the command? (appearance/
presence),
2) auditor gives command/question to pc (cause, distance,
effect),
3) pc looks to bank for answer,
4) pc receives answer from bank,
5) pc gives answer to auditor (cause, distance, effect),
6) auditor acknowledges pc,
7) auditor sees that pc received acknowledgement (attention),
8) new cycle beginning with (1).
CHARGE: The stored quantities of energy in the time track; stored
energy
or stored or recreatable potentials of energy. The electrical
impulse on the case that activates the meter. Harmful energy or
force accumulated and generated in the reactive mind, result
ing from the conflicts and unpleasant experiences that a person
has had.
MENTAL MASS: Mocking up matter, energy, space and time. Its
proportionate
weight would be terribly slight compared to the real object
which the person is mocking up a picture of.
FLOATING A floating needle is a rhythmic sweep of the dial at a slow,
even
NEEDLE: pace of the needle. It can occur after a cognition, blowdown of
the tone arm, or just moves into floating. The pc may or may
not voice the cognition. In Dianetics the auditor will only indi
cate the F/N when full end phenomena of the process has been
reached.
MENTAL IMAGE (Already defined earlier) PICTURE:
LOCK: A mental image picture of an incident where one was knowingly
or unknowingly reminded of a secondary or engram. It does not
itself contain a blow or burn or impact and is not any major
cause of misemotion. It does not contain unconsciousness. It
may contain a feeling of pain or illness, etc., but is not itself
the source of it.
SECONDARY: A secondary is a mental image picture of a moment of severe
and shocking loss or threat of loss which contains misemotion
such as anger, fear, grief, apathy or "deathfulness." It is a
mental image picture recording of a time of severe mental
stress. It may contain unconsciousness.
ENGRAM: A mental image picture of an experience
containing pain,
unconsciousness, and a real or fancied threat to survival. It is a
recording in the reactive mind of something which actually
happened to an individual in the past and which contained
pain and unconsciousness, both of which are recorded in the
mental image picture called an engram. It must, by definition,
have impact or injury as part of its content. These engrams are
a complete recording, down to the last accurate detail, of every
perception present in a moment of partial or full uncon
sciousness.
INCIDENT: The recording of an experience, simple or complex, related by
the same subject, location or people, understood to take place
in a short or finite time period such as minutes or hours or
days.
DURATION: Length of time; time during which anything continues. (Thorn
dike Barnhart Dictionary)
CHAIN: A series of incidents of similar nature or similar subject
matter.
. . . A series of recordings of similar experiences. A chain has
engrams, secondaries and locks. Example-Head injury chain
in the sequence encountered by an auditor and run by R3RA-
sporting goods display window seeing it (lock), losing a bat
(secondary), hit in the head with a bat (engram). The engram
is the earliest date, the secondary a later date, the lock the
most recent.
ERASURE: 1. The action of erasing, (rubbing out) locks, secondaries or
engrams.
2. Apparent removal of the engram from the files of the en
gram bank and refiling in the standard bank as memory.
POSTULATE: A conclusion, decision or resolution made by the individual
himself; to conclude, decide or resolve a problem or to set a
pattern for the future or to nullify a pattern of the past.
. . . We mean, by postulate, self-created truth. A postulate is,
of course, that thing which is a directed desire or order, or
inhibition, or enforcement, on the part of the individual in the
form of an idea.
. . . Postulate means to cause a thinkingness or consideration.
COGNITION: A pc origination indicating he has "come to realize." It's a
"What do you know? I...." statement. A new realization of life. It
results in a higher degree of awareness and consequently a
greater ability to succeed with one's endeavors in life.
FLOW: An impulse or direction of energy particles or thought or
masses between terminals.
The progress of particles or impulses or waves from point A to
point B.
A progress of energy between two points.
SOLID: When the meter needle is not floating the TA is registering
mass, mental mass. When you see a TA going up, up, up you
know the picture isn't erasing but is getting more solid.
Strongly put together; hard; firm.
AFFINITY: Degree of liking or affection or lack of it.
Affinity is a tolerance
of distance. A great affinity would be a tolerance of or liking of
close proximity. A lack of affinity would be an intolerance of or
dislike of close proximity. Affinity is one of the components of
understanding; the other components being reality and com
munication.
REALITY: The agreed upon apparency of existence. A reality is an data
that agrees with the person's perceptions, computations and
education. Reality is one of the components of understanding.
Reality is what is.
COMMUNICATION: The interchange of ideas or objects between two people or
terminals. More precisely the definition of communication
is the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or
particle from source point across a distance to receipt
point, with the intention of bringing into being at the
receipt point a duplication of that which emanated from the
source point. The formula of communication is: cause,
distance, effect, with attention and duplication.
Communication by definition does not need to be two-way.
Communication is one of the component parts of
understanding.
ARC BREAK: A sudden drop or cutting of one's affinity, reality or communi
cation with someone or something. It is pronounced by its
letters A-R-C break.
PROBLEM: Anything which has opposing sides of equal force; especially
postulate-counter-postulate, intention-counter-intention or idea
counter-idea; an intention-counter-intention that worries the
preclear.
PRESENT TIME A specific problem that exists in the physical universe
now, on
PROBLEM: which a person has his attention fixed.
. . . Any set of circumstances that so engages the attention of the
preclear that he feels he should be doing something about
it instead of being audited.
WITHHOLD: An undisclosed harmful (contra-survival) act.
MISSED An undisclosed contra-survival act which has been restimulated
WITHHOLD: by another but not disclosed. This is a withhold which another
person nearly found out about, leaving the person with the withhold
in a state of wondering whether his hidden deed is known or
not.
EXAMINER: Preclear Examiner. The person in a Scientology church to
whom preclears are sent immediately after any auditing session.
The Examiner says nothing to the preclear in this situation,
noting only what the pc's tone arm position and state of the
needle are on the E-Meter and recording what the pc says, if
anything. The Examiner is also the person a preclear sees if he
wishes to make any sort of statement regarding his case, or if
there is something he wants handled regarding his case.
HCOB 9.7.78R
Rev 4.9.78
Attachment No. 2
DIANETIC CS-1 WORD LIST
R3RA COMMAND WORD LIST:
a it tell
an later that
and locate the
another lose there
are lost this
be me through
beginning more time
caused move to
causing of was
do one we
does or what
duration others when
earlier point you
end return your
erasing running yourself
go see
going seem
had similar
happened solid
incident start
is starting
PREASSESSMENT WORD LIST:
aches emotions pressures
are fears sensations
attitudes feelings soreness
compulsions is tiredness
connected misemotions unconsciousness
discomforts numbness what
dislikes pains with
RUDIMENTS WORD LIST:
a are do
about been earlier
affinity communication enforced
an curious has
ARC break desired have
inhibited problem that
missed present time problem understanding
missed withhold refused withhold
no reality withholding
overt similar you
L3RE WORD LIST:
abandoned get problem
alcohol giving protesting
accept gone real
all goof really
ARC break got reason
assessed have refused
attain heavily resent
audited held (not recent)
auditor held up restimulated
basic implant run
because incident say
black incorrect said
chain indicated same
chains interest saying
changed interrupted sequence
changing Int RD should
charge invalidated simply
charged invisible skipped
C/ear item some
cognition jump something
command jumped soon
commands just state
completed late stop
confused left still
constantly /et stopped
could mass stuck
date medicine suppressed
death messed than
declare misrun thing
demanded missed tired
Dianetic misunderstood time
did misworded too
didn't no trouble
different nobody twice
distracted not two
drugs nothing unnecessary
else on up
engrams originally upset
erased over went
expressed past were
exterior persistent while
false picture with
first pictures withhold
Flows postulate wording
flubbed place would
F/N pressure wrong
found prevented
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JULY 1978
REISSUED 11 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 4-1
THE PREASSESSMENT LIST
This Preassessment List will get you running items, if the pc has given
you a general somatic item, a drug item, alcohol item, etc.
To be used as described in HCOB 18 June 1978, New Era Dianetics Series
4 ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM.
Pc Name________________________ Date_________________
Auditor Name____________________
Name of New Era Dianetics Rundown being done_____________________________
Original item being preassessed____________________________________________
Assess the list below, using each preassessment item.
"Are_______ connected with (original item)?"
[pic]
Take the largest reading preassessment item and ask pc: "What (largest
reading preassessment item) are connected with (original item)?"
Do the preassessment on this sheet.
List the question and the pays answers on a separate sheet and note
reads of each including F/Ns.
(See BTB 7 Nov 72R Issue IV Auditor Admin Series 19R, DIANETIC
ASSESSMENT LISTS.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldv.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JULY 1978R
Issue I
REVISED 15 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions not in Script)
TYPICAL DIANETIC CHAIN
Original item: "Bronchitis"
Preassessment item: "Misemotion"
Running item: "Horrible feeling in my lungs"
Incident Date of Duration of TA Position
Incident Incident
1st Incident 1 Mar 1970 2 Hours 3.3 at Step 1
run 2 times 3.2 at Step 9
through 3.5 at Step C
2nd Incident 2 Jul 1963 7 Minutes 3.4 at Step 9
run 3 times 3.4 at Step C
through EB-------- (Earl. Begin.)
(due to there 3.5 at Step F
being an EB)
3rd Incident 3 Aug 1960 ---------5 Hours--------- 3.6 at Step 9
run 1 time through
4th Incident 1 Dec 1951 1 1/2 Hours 3.5 at Step 9
run 2 times through 3.6 at Step C
5th Incident 16 Feb 1921 2l/2 Hours 3.7 at Step 9
run 1 time through
6th Incident 2 Feb 1898 2 Hours 3.2 at Step 9
run 2 times through 3.4 at Step C
7th Incident 22 May 1882 1 Hour 3.3 at Step 9
run 8 times 3.2 at Step C
through 3.0 at Step F
(BASIC) 2.8 at Step F
EB------------- (Earl. Begin.)
2.8 at Step F
2.9 at Step F
EB---------------------- (Earl. Begin.)
2.6 at Step F
BD & F/N
Pc gives Postulate
Wide F/N & VGIs
EP of chain.
The three remaining flows are each run as above to their basics. Then
do further preassessment per R3RA. Twenty-five more running item Quad
chains to go. (100 in all). Meaning 100 more chains, each one of which
reaches a BASIC and each one of which has an EP of F/N, POSTULATE, VGIs,
accompanied by an erasure.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright �1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JULY 1978R
Issue II
REVISED 15 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
A TYPICAL NARRATIVE ITEM
NARRATIVE ITEM: "Death of my father"
TA Position
1st pass through
2.9 at Step 9
<------original duration------>
2 hours
2nd pass through
EB--------------------------------------------- 3.0 at Step C
3rd pass through
EB---------------------------------------------------- 3.0 at Step C
4th pass through
EB--------------------------------------------------------grief
2.8 at Step C
5th pass through
---------------(center now missing)-------------------- 2.7 at Step C
6th pass through
---------------( center to end now gone) 2.6 at Step C
7th pass through
EB----------------(center erased) new piece appears 2.7 at Step C
8th pass through
EB------ Postulate comes off 2.5
(Auditor ceases to put pc through the
chain the instant the postulate comes off.)
Broader continual F/N, VGIs
(Incident has erased).
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JULY 1978
Remimeo (Cancels BTB 8 Jan 71R, Auditing CS-1
for Dianetics and Scientology)
SCIENTOLOGY
AUDITING CS-1
The Scientology CS-1 is to give a pc new to Scientology or a previously
audited pc, as needed, the necessary data and R-Factor on basics and
auditing procedure so that he understands and is able and willing to be
audited successfully.
NOTE: Some pcs who have been trained or audited previously may protest
that they know the terms and procedure. If this happens, acknowledge with
excellent TRs and without invalidation or evaluation and tell them that
this CS is intended to make auditing more effective for all pcs. If the
auditor uses excellent TRs and good R-Factor, no ARC breaks should ever
occur and the pc will have tremendous wins.
It is not necessary to reclear those sections of this Scn CS-1 which
the pc may have already covered in a recent and thorough Dianetics CS-1,
provided the auditor is certain of the pc's understanding of the terms.
The auditor should be fully familiar with this issue as well as:
HCOB 17 Oct 64 III ALL LEVELS GETTING THE PC SESSIONABLE
HCOB 5 Apr 69 NEW PRECLEARS, THE WORKABILITY OF
SCIENTOLOGY
HCOB 16 Jun 70 C/S Series 6 WHAT THE C/S IS DOING
He will need to take a very thorough look at what has to be covered
with the pc in this CS-1 and know his materials very well and have them
ready in the CS-1 session for reference and clearing any misunderstoods or
questions the pc may have.
The following will be needed in the auditing room:
Technical Dictionary
Admin Dictionary
A good English dictionary
A good dictionary in the pc's native language, and for a foreign
language case a dual dictionary (English-to-foreign language and
foreign language itself).
Scn CS-1 Definitions Sheet-Attachment No. 1 of this issue.
The Basic Scientology Picture Book
Fundamentals of Thought
HCOB 14 Oct 68R, The Auditor's Code
Demo Kit
and the auditor makes full use of these as necessary. If further
references are
needed, ensure source materials are used.
A. Have the pc define each Scientology (or other) term, using the
references. (Note: You don't ask: "Do you know what this word means?"
You ask: "What is the definition of _____?")
When he has done so, have him give you a sentence or two using the term
correctly. Where it applies, have him give you examples, using his
experiences where possible or those of relatives or friends and/or have him
demonstrate the item using a demo kit. Cover by exact definition all terms
used.
B. Check for any questions (or misunderstoods) as you go along and
ensure any such get handled so the pc winds up with a clear
understanding of the word, item or procedure.
Don't settle for glibness that does not show understanding, but, on the
other hand, don't overrun or put duress on the pc either.
Ensure that each word cleared on the pc is taken to F/N.
SCN CS-1 PROCEDURE:
1. Give pc the R-Factor that you are going to do a Scientology Auditing
CS-1 to familiarize him with auditing procedure and any basic data that
may require clarification.
2. Clear the word: Scientology.
3. Clear the words: a) auditing d) Clear
b) auditing session e) preclear
c) auditor
4. Clear the words: a) thetan
b) mind
c) body
Have pc use the demo kit as well as the references to ensure he gets
the relationship between these.
5. Now clear the words: a) picture c) reactive mind
b) mental image d) bank picture
Have the pc give you examples of how the reactive mind works on a
stimulus response basis, and have him demo it.
6. Clear with the pc:
a) the communication cycle.
Get the pc to give you examples he has observed. Have him demo the
communication cycle.
b) the auditing comm cycle.
Get the pc to explain the difference between a comm cycle and the
auditing comm cycle. Have him demonstrate it.
You can also ask him questions like: "Have you eaten dinner?" (or
breakfast or lunch) and when he replies, ask: "What did you do when I
asked you that question?"
7. Go over the TRs with the pc, demonstrating each with him, until he
has a good idea of how they are used in auditing.
8. Clear the words: a) charge b) mental mass
9. Go over with the pc what the meter does (registers charge/mental
mass).
For demonstration, you can do a "pinch test" where you explain to the
pc that to show him how the meter registers mental mass you will give
him a pinch as part of the demonstration. Then get him to think of the
pinch (while he is holding the cans) showing him the meter reaction and
explaining how it registers mental mass.
10. a) Clear the words: 1. key-in
2. key-out
and have the pc demo and give you examples of each.
b) Clear the word: release. Have the pc demo it.
11. a) Clear the word: postulate.
b) Have pc give you examples of a time or two when he postulated
something and got it.
12. a) Clear the word: cognition.
b) Have the pc give you some examples of a cognition.
13. Clear: floating needle.
14. a) Give the pc an R-Factor on rudiments and when these would be
used.
b) Clear the word: rudiment.
c) Clear: 1. affinity
2. reality
3. communication
Have pc give you examples of each.
d) Clear: ARC break.
Have the pc demo it for you.
e) Clear the words: curious, desired, enforced, inhibited, no,
refused.
f) Clear: 1. problem
2. present time problem
Have the pc demo: 1) a problem 2) a present time problem.
g) Clear: 1) overt 2) withhold 3) missed withhold.
Have the pc demo: 1) an overt 2) withhold 3) missed withhold.
(Use Definitions Sheet, or other references as needed.)
15. a) Clear the words: 1. similar 2. earlier.
b) Then clear: "earlier similar." Give the pc examples of where it
would be used.
16. Clear with the pc what a repetitive process is. Ensure he understands
why and how it is done. Have the pc demo it for you.
17. a) Clear the word: flow.
b) Clear each of the Flows 1, 2, 3, 0.
c) Have the pc give you an example and demo of each.
18. Clear the words: a) assess b) assessment.
19. a) Explain to the pc that if at any time there is any difficulty
in the auditing, you (or another auditor) will be using a prepared
list to find and handle the exact difficulty.
b) Ensure he understands that when such a list is being assessed
he sits quietly holding the cans while the auditor calls the list
and takes meter reads to locate the difficulty.
20. Go over the Auditor's Code, Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 17, 18,
19 and 22.
Check for and clear up any questions or misunderstoods the pc may have
on this.
21. a) Clear: Examiner.
b) Give the pc an R-Factor on the Examiner and the fact that
he will go to the Examiner immediately after each auditing session.
Ensure he understands the Examiner says nothing to the preclear at
that time, only recording what the pc says and noting down the tone
arm position and state of the needle.
Also, be sure the pc understands that the Examiner is the person he
sees if he wishes to make any sort of statement regarding his case.
22. Turn the folder in to the C/S.
The C/S can also order any additional actions to the above.
The Scientology Auditing CS-1 can usually be completed in one session.
If it takes more than one session, the first session should be ended off at
the end of a step or completion of a word or demonstration-never in the
middle of an action.
Make sure you do not leave your preclear with a question or a
misunderstood or confusion. Know the preclear in front of you and get your
product of an educated pc who can run Scientology processes easily and with
gain.
CLEARING COMMANDS
The Scientology Auditing CS-1 does not preclude clearing the commands
of each process or clearing a procedure in a session where the pc is begun
on a new process or procedure. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS)
This would include the first time the pc is given a two-way comm
session or a listing & nulling session, where the procedure would first be
fully cleared on the pc by the auditor.
CLEARING WORDS ON CORRECTION LISTS
In addition to the CS-1, to fully prepare the pc for his auditing up
the Grade Chart, it is standard to clear the words on the various
correction lists very early in auditing, before the need for them arises.
(Otherwise, it is difficult to clear the words of a correction list over
heavy bypassed charge.) Thus, when the need for correction lists does arise
the words have already been cleared and the correction list can be used
without delay. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS, Items 7 and 8.)
This would be done as ordered by the C/S.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright C) 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCOB 15.7.78
Attachment I
SCIENTOLOGY CS-1
DEFINITIONS SHEET
The following definitions have been taken from the Technical Dictionary
and from the glossary of the book Dianetics Today.
Use these in conjunction with the Basic Scientology Picture Book. If
further references are needed when clearing these terms and concepts,
ensure source materials are used. For any non-Scientology terms use a good
non-dinky dictionary.
SCIENTOLOGY:
An applied religious philosophy developed by L. Ron Hubbard dealing
with the study of knowledge, which through the application of its
technology can bring about desirable changes in the conditions of life.
(Taken from the Latin word scio, knowing in the fullest sense of the
word, and the Greek word logos, to study.)
A body of knowledge which, when properly used, gives freedom and truth
to the individual.
AUDITING:
Processing, the application of Scientology (or Dianetic) processes and
procedures to someone by a trained auditor. The exact definition of
auditing is: the action of asking a preclear a question (which he can
understand and answer), getting an answer to that question and
acknowledging him for that answer.
AUDITING SESSION:
A period in which an auditor and preclear are in a quiet place where
they will not be disturbed. The auditor gives the preclear certain and
exact commands which the preclear can follow.
AUDITOR:
A person trained and qualified in applying Scientology and/or Dianetic
processes and procedures to individuals for their betterment; called an
auditor because auditor means "one who listens." An auditor is a
minister of the Church of Scientology.
*CLEAR:
A thetan who can be at cause knowingly and at will over mental matter,
energy, space and time as regards the first dynamic (survival for
self). The state of Clear is above the release grades of Scientology
(all of which are requisite to clearing) and is attained by completion
of the Clearing Course at an Advanced Church of Scientology.
PRECLEAR:
From pre-Clear, a person not yet Clear; generally a person being
audited, who is thus on the road to Clear; a person who, through
Scientology and Dianetic processing, is finding out more about himself
and life.
* [An additional reference on Clear is: HCOB 24 September 1978. Issue III,
Diabetic Clear, "The State of Clear can be achieved on Dianetics."]
THETAN:
From THETA (life static), a word taken from the Greek symbol or letter:
theta, traditional symbol for thought or spirit. The thetan is the
individual himself-not the body or the mind. The thetan is the "I"; one
doesn't have or own a thetan; one is a thetan.
MIND:
A control system between the thetan and the physical universe. It is
not the brain. The mind is the accumulated recordings of thoughts,
conclusions, decisions, observations and perceptions of a thetan
throughout his entire existence. The thetan can and does use the mind
in handling life and the physical universe.
BODY:
The organized physical composition or substance of an animal or man
whether living or dead.
PICTURE:
An exact likeness; image. A mental image.
MENTAL IMAGE PICTURE:
Mental pictures; facsimiles and mock-ups; a copy of one's perceptions
of the physical universe sometime in the past.
REACTIVE MIND:
Reactive bank. The portion of the mind which works on a stimulus-
response basis (given a certain stimulus it will automatically give a
certain response) which is not under a person's volitional control and
which exerts force and power over a person's awareness, purposes,
thoughts, body and actions.
The reactive mind never stops operating. Pictures of the environment,
of a very low order, are taken by this mind even in some states of
unconsciousness.
BANK:
A colloquial name for the reactive mind. The mental image picture
collection of the pc.
COMMUNICATION CYCLE:
A completed communication, including origination of the communication,
receipt of the communication, and answer or acknowledgement of the
communication. A communication cycle consists of just: cause, distance,
effect, with intention, attention, duplication and understanding.
AUDITING COMM CYCLE:
(HCOB 30 Apr 71) This is the auditing comm cycle that is always in use:
(1) is the pc ready to receive the command? (appearance, presence)
(2) auditor gives command/question to pc (cause, distance, effect)
(3) pc looks to bank for answer . . .
(4) pc receives answer from bank
(5) pc gives answer to auditor (cause, distance, effect)
(6) auditor acknowledges pc
(7) auditor sees that pc received acknowledgement (attention)
(8) new cycle beginning with (1).
CHARGE:
The stored quantities of energy in the time track; stored energy or
stored or recreatable potentials of energy. The electrical impulse on
the case that activates the meter. Harmful energy or force accumulated
and generated in the reactive mind, resulting from the conflicts and
unpleasant experiences that a person has had.
MENTAL MASS:
Mocking up matter, energy, space and time. Its proportionate weight
would be terribly slight compared to the real object which the person
is mocking up a picture of.
KEY-IN:
The action of recording a lock on a secondary or engram; the moment an
earlier upset or earlier incident has been restimulated.
KEY-OUT:
An action of an engram or secondary dropping away without being erased.
Released or separate from one's reactive mind or some portion of it.
RELEASE:
A preclear whose reactive mind or some major portion of it is keyed-out
and is not influencing him.
A series of gradual key-outs. At any given one of those key-outs the
individual detaches from the remainder of his reactive bank.
In Scientology processing there are eight major grades of Release. They
are, from the lowest to the highest: Grade 0 Communications Release,
Grade I Problems Release, Grade II Relief Release, Grade III Freedom
Release, Grade IV Ability Release, Grade V Power Release, Grade VA
Power Plus Release, Grade VI Whole Track Release. Each is a distinct
and definite step toward greater levels of awareness and ability.
POSTULATE:
A conclusion, decision or resolution made by the individual himself; to
conclude, decide or resolve a problem or to set a pattern for the
future or to nullify a pattern of the past.
. . . We mean, by postulate, a self-created truth. A postulate is, of
course, that thing which is directed desire or order, or inhibition, or
enforcement, on the part of the individual in the form of an idea.
. . . Postulate means to cause a thinkingness or consideration.
COGNITION:
A pc origination indicating he has "come to realize." It's a "What do
you know? I . . ." statement. A new realization of life. It results in
a higher degree of awareness and consequently a greater ability to
succeed with one's endeavors in life.
FLOATING NEEDLE:
A floating needle is a rhythmic sweep of the dial at a slow, even pace
of the needle.
It is always accompanied by very good indicators in the pc. (Ref: HCOB
10 Dec 76R, C/S Series 99R SCN F/N AND TA POSITION, HCOB 21 Jul 78 WHAT
IS AN F/N.)
RUDIMENTS:
First principles, steps, stages or conditions. The basic actions done
at the beginning of a session to set up the pc for the major session
action; ARC breaks, PTPs, withholds.
AFFINITY:
Degree of liking or affection or lack of it. Affinity is a tolerance of
distance. A great affinity would be a tolerance of or liking of close
proximity. A lack of affinity would be an intolerance of or dislike of
close proximity. Affinity is one of the components of understanding,
the other components being reality and communication.
REALITY:
The agreed upon apparency of existence. A reality is any data that
agrees with the person's perceptions, computations and education.
Reality is one of the components of understanding. Reality is what is.
COMMUNICATION:
The interchange of ideas or objects between two people or terminals.
More precisely the definition of communication is the consideration and
action of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a
distance to receipt point, with the intention of bringing into being at
the receipt point a duplication of that which emanated from the source
point. The formula of communication is: cause, distance, effect, with
attention and duplication. Communication by definition does not need to
be two-way. Communication is one of the component parts of
understanding.
ARC BREAK:
A sudden drop or cutting of one's affinity, reality or communication
with someone or something. It is pronounced by its letters A-R-C break.
PROBLEM:
Anything which has opposing sides of equal force; especially postulate-
counterpostulate, intention-counter-intention or idea-counter-idea; an
intention-counterintention that worries the preclear.
PRESENT TIME PROBLEM:
A specific problem that exists in the physical universe now, on which a
person has his attention fixed.
. . . Any set of circumstances that so engages the attention of the
preclear that he feels he should be doing something about it instead of
being audited.
OVERT:
An overt act is an act of omission or commission which does the least
good for the least number of dynamics or the most harm to the greatest
number of dynamics.
. . . An aggressive or destructive act by the individual against one or
more of the eight dynamics (self, family, group, mankind, animals or
plants, mest, life or the infinite). That thing which you do which you
aren't willing to have happen to you.
WITHHOLD:
An undisclosed harmful (contra-survival) act.
MISSED WITHHOLD:
An undisclosed contra-survival act which has been restimulated by
another but not disclosed. This is a withhold which another person
nearly found out about, leaving the person with the withhold in a state
of wondering whether his hidden deed is known or not.
REPETITIVE PROCESS:
... A process that is run over and over with the same question of the
pc.... we don't expect the auditor to do anything but state the command
(or ask the question) with no variation, acknowledge the pc's answer
and handle the pc origins by understanding and acknowledging what the
pc said. A process which permits the individual to examine his mind and
environment and out of it select the unimportances and importances.
FLOW:
A progress of energy between two points.
An impulse or direction of energy particles or thought or masses
between terminals.
The progress of particles or impulses or waves from Point A to Point B.
ASSESS:
To choose, from a list of statements-which item or thing has the
longest read and the pc's interest. The longest read usually will also
have the pc's interest.
ASSESSMENT:
. . . an action done from a prepared list. Assessment is done by the
auditor between the pc's bank and the meter.... just notes which item
has the longest fall or Lowdown. The auditor looks at the meter while
doing an assessment. Assessment is the whole action of obtaining a
significant item from a pc.
EXAMINER:
Preclear Examiner. The person in a Scientology church to whom preclears
are sent immediately after any auditing session. The Examiner says
nothing to the preclear in this situation, noting only what the pc's
tone arm position and state of the needle are on the E-Meter and
recording what the pc says, if anything. The Examiner is also the
person a preclear sees if he wishes to make any sort of statement
regarding his case, or if there is something he wants handled regarding
his case.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JULY 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 17
DIANETIC PERSISTENT F/Ns
If the original item is not totally and completely gone you can run
into a condition where the pc is on a persistent F/N with regard to it but
it's still there slightly and nothing reads but it only F/Ns.
What you can do in that case is:
1. take the pc off auditing for a few days while the persistent
F/N dies out and the environment keys something in and continue
then with the assessment of that original item or
2. go on with some other original item that does read and make a
big clear notation in the pc's program to come back to the original
item after you have run some other original items on the case.
If you get stopped by a persistent F/N and some condition is still
there, don't use an F/N as an excuse not to come back to the original item!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JULY 1978
Remimeo
New Era Dianetics Series 18
AFTER THE FACT ITEMS
You will sometimes have trouble with a particular kind of running item.
It is known as an "after the fact item."
First, why do you get erasures only because you ask for earlier
beginnings or earlier similars? Because the thetan's mind where pictures
are concerned parallels the time track.
Late things hang up where earlier like things exist.
For some reason best known to thetans, you have to get the earlier like
thing before you can erase the later like thing.
This is built into R3RA.
But what isn't built in is preventing the pc giving or the auditor
choosing an "after the fact" running item.
An "after the fact" running item is one which clearly has an earlier
thing before it, yet, by its very wording, prohibits reaching the earlier
thing.
Example of an "after the fact" running item: "Repression."
Now clearly something had to happen before in order to have something
repress.
The pc dutifully begins to run "Feeling repressed." But what happened
that caused it is not part of the item. So he is forced to run late in the
incident.
Example: "Feeling blue about hospitals."
This will find him in hospitals but will avoid letting him run what put
him there.
The item is after the fact of having been run over.
The way to handle "after the fact" running items is:
1. Learn to recognize them.
2. Don't choose one off a running item list. Choose something else
that read.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ldv
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
All C/Ses
All W/Cers
All Tech Checksheets
WHAT IS A FLOATING NEEDLE?
A floating needle is a rhythmic sweep of the dial at a slow, even pace
of the needle.
That's what an F/N is. No other definition is correct.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:pb.lfg
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
ASSESSMENT TRs
The right way to do an assessment is to ask the pc the question in a
questioning tone of voice.
In assessing, some auditors have made assessment questions into
statements of fact, which of course is a cousin to evaluation.
A downcurve at the end of an assessment question contributes to making
it a statement. Questions should go up at the end.
[pic]
A remedy for this is to record ordinary conversation. Ask some normal
questions and make some normal statements and you will find that the voice
tone rises on a question and goes down on a statement.
Assessing with a statement's tone of voice instead of a questioning
tone of voice results in evaluation for the pc. The pc feels accused or
evaluated for rather than assessed and an auditor can get a lot of false
and protest reads.
It's all tone of voice. Auditors have to be drilled in asking
questions. Assessment questions have an upcurve at the end.
Get it?
Then drill it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ifg
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JULY 1978
Remimeo
Originally issued as HCOB
10 Mar 70 LIST OF PERCEPTICS
DIANETICS BULLETIN. This
issue has been revised.
(Revisions are given here in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
C/S Series 101
LIST OF PERCEPTICS
This was researched and dates of 1951.
It's the 57 human perceptions.
1. Time
2. Sight
3. Taste
4. Colour
5. Depth
6. Solidity (Barriers)
7. Relative Sizes (External)
8. Sound
9. Pitch
10. Tone
11. Volume
12. Rhythm
13. Smell (The sense of smell has four subdivisions which are categories
of the type
of odor.)
14. Touch a) Pressure b) Friction c) Heat or Cold d) Oiliness
15. Personal Emotion
16. Endocrine States
17. Awareness of Awareness
18. Personal Size
19. Organic Sensation (Including Hunger)
20. Heartbeat
21. Blood Circulation
22. Cellular and Bacterial Position
23. Gravitic (Self and Other Weights)
24. Motion of Self
25. Motion (Exterior)
26. Body Position
27. Joint Position
28. Internal Temperature
29. External Temperature
30. Balance
31. Muscular Tension
32. Saline Content of Self (Body)
33. Fields/Magnetic
34. Time Track Motion
35. Physical Energy (Personal Weariness etc.)
36. Self-Determinism (Relative on each dynamic)
37. Moisture (Self)
38. Sound Direction
39. Emotional State of Other Organs
40. Personal Position on the Tone Scale
41. Affinity (Self and Others)
42. Communication (Self and Others)
43. Reality (Self and Others)
44. Emotional State of Groups
45. Compass Direction
46. Level of Consciousness
47. Pain
48. Perception of Conclusions (Past and Present)
49. Perception of Computations (Past and Present)
50. Perception of Imagination (Past and Present)
51. Perception of Having Perceived (Past and Present)
52. Awareness of Not Knowing
53. Awareness of Importance, Unimportance
54. Awareness of Others
55. Awareness of Location and Placement a) Masses b) Spaces c) Location
Itself
56. Perception of Appetite (. . .)
57. Kinesthesia
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 JULY 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors (Cancels and replaces BTB 3
All C/Ses Oct 69R DIANETIC REMEDIES)
DIANETIC REMEDIES
The remedies given here will handle pcs who go anaten or dope off in
session even though they are well rested beforehand. They will also handle
high TAs caused by chains left in restimulation by reason of not taking
them to a full Dianetic EP.
WORD CLEARING
One of the beginning pc's first steps in auditing is a thorough and
complete CS-I. This is given as ACTION SEVEN on New Era Dianetics Series 2,
FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE. It must be done until the pc well understands the
commands of R3RA and knows what is expected of him as a pc. (Ref: HCOB 9
Jul 78, DIANETIC CS-I.)
DO NOT attempt to run R3RA on a pc who is not properly indoctrinated.
Clear the commands. Clear the list words and clear the procedures with him.
It is the auditor's responsibility to ensure the pc understands the
commands and the procedure he is being run on.
So the first remedy given here is WORD CLEARING. A pc who does not
understand R3RA commands, assessment procedures, etc. will only restimulate
masses in Dianetic sessions, he will not be able to erase them.
If there is any doubt that your pc understands the commands and
procedures of R3RA, you clear these up immediately.
There are uniformly two things that prevent pcs from running engrams.
They are the failure to fully clear all the commands and procedures of R3RA
as we have covered above, and unhandled drugs.
Hence, the following remedies are to be done in their correct sequence
on the pc's Dianetic program, after a full and complete drug handling per
New Era Dianetics Series 99 DRUG HANDLING. (Ref: New Era Dianetics Series
2, FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE.)
PICTURES OR MASSES
The following remedy is ordered by the C/S when the pc has no
misunderstood words but still goes anaten in session, even when assessment
and R3RA procedure are correctly done and the pc has had sufficient sleep,
with no unflat chains evident by folder inspection but has a very high or
low TA.
The auditor asks: "What pictures or masses have you touched on in life
or in auditing that have been left unhandled?"
The most obvious remedy is simply to take the best reading picture that
was left unflat in auditing and simply finish the chain. If the pc had only
run it single flow at the time then finish it single flow for certain and
check the other flows to see if they read and run them if they do. The
question one checks is Step One narrative or Step One regular R3RA. One
uses narrative when it is simply an incident and regular R3RA when he
remembers what somatic he was running at the time.
The essence of this is simply to complete something that was already
started and wasn't completed.
If it was a picture which simply appeared in life, one can treat it as
an original item per the Assessment HCOB and carry on from there.
Caution should be observed in running a pc on Quad who hitherto had
only been run on single or triple flows. One can get onto the subject of
bypassed charge when he suddenly runs a new flow (like Flow 0) that has
never been run before on a new item. What happens is the pc, audited on
single or triple on other items in previous auditing, collides with some of
the unrun charge of previously unhandled chains of that flow and can get
quite upset. The best handling of this sort of thing is called "Quading up
a pc" as contained in HCOB 7 March 71R, USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS.
Masses are handled simply by treating them as an original item as in
the Assessment HCOB.
In pictures or masses remedies, one is best off following New Era
Dianetics Series 4. Just treat the picture or mass as an original item.
Therefore, when the pc gives you a list of pictures or masses that have
been touched on in life or auditing he is really giving you a list of
original items so far as handling is concerned. The auditor takes the best
reading item from that list and does a preassessment on it.
"Are/is (preassessment item) connected with (item)?" is the
preassessment question.
The auditor then follows the procedure outlined in HCOB 18 June 1978
New Era Dianetics Series 4, doing a full preassessment and runs out R3RA
Quad all reading items with pc interest.
When this action is correctly performed the TA of the pc will be back
in range, and the pc will be bright.
AUTOMATICITY OF PICTURES
There are some pcs who keep talking about "this huge automaticity of
pictures coming in, faster and faster." They also dope off in session and
they are somewhat hard to get an F/N on.
The thing which is really wrong with the pc is instability. He can't
hold things still.
A C/S could order HCO Training Bulletin of 6 Feb 1957 (Technical Volume
III) - "Hold It Still."
Objectives are also indicated, particularly SCS, as the pc can't
control things.
After flattening Objectives it will be found that the pc's bank is more
stable.
As the multipictures may also have keyed something in a C/S, after
Objectives are flat, could order the following:
"Ask the pc 'What pictures have you seen in life or auditing?' and
treat the best reading items in the resulting list as original items,
handling them per New Era Dianetics Series 4."
The phenomenon of automatic pictures is also called "an avalanche" and
data on it is available in the Technical Bulletins Volume II, page 39,
Volume VIII, page 106. The above section is the best handling.
OVERTS
When the pc goes anaten in session but there is no evidence of unflat
chains, the C/S issues this C/S:
"Assess for: Overts on unconscious people Overts on anaten people
Overts on asleep people Overts on sick people.
"Run each reading item with interest R3RA Narrative Quad, running F2
first."
The C/S could vary the assessment list, adding items if necessary in
accordance with what the pc was motivating from.
IMAGINARY INCIDENTS
Sometimes a pc cannot confront the actual incidents that are keyed-in
by life or auditing. Such a pc will not go backtrack. In this case the
running of imaginary incidents is quite productive. Sometimes the preclear
will run them, quite astonishingly, with somatics. But he is not being
required to face any reality about them and the auditor is not insisting
that any reality exists concerning them. In a surprisingly high percentage
of times, however, he will be running actual incidents. So long as he does
not have to admit that these incidents are actual he can do something about
them.
It should be understood that no amount of imaginary incidents can
supplant the running of real incidents. The first value that this technique
has-the invitation to the preclear to run avowedly imaginary incidents in
his past-is to build up, the preclear's confidence in the auditor. The
preclear begins to feel that he will not be censured for indulging in
fantasy.
When the preclear discovers that he has an auditor who not only will
listen to imagination but who encourages it, the affinity level rises and
the preclear's ability to differentiate in terms of reality will itself
rise.
The auditor must never, after the incident has been run, then insist
that the incident was real. This would be a break of faith. He and the
preclear have entered into a contract that what is being run is pure
imagination, and the auditor must not break his contract.
To run imaginary incidents, the auditor discusses with the pc how they
will be running imaginary incidents and gets the pc's agreement to do so.
The auditor then asks, "What imaginary incidents or pictures have you
touched on?"
All the pc's responses to this question, with their meter reads are
noted by the auditor. He then takes up the best reading incident or picture
and runs it out R3RA Narrative Quad, first checking interest. Lesser
reading items are then taken up.
This action is done until the pc is brighter and more able to confront
actual incidents as they come up in auditing.
In doing this remedy be certain the pc understands R3RA procedure and has
NO MISUNDERSTOODS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo
CANCELLATION OF ISSUES
The following issues are CANCELLED. References are included below to
indicate where correct data on these subjects can be obtained.
HCOB 23 Apr 69 II DIANETICS ERASURE HOW TO ATTAIN
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS)
HCOB 27 Apr 69 R3R RESTATED COMMANDS ON SECOND RUN ON AN INCIDENT
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS)
HCOB 9 May 69 II CASE SUPERVISOR FORMS
(Ref: HCOB 9 Jul 78 DIANETIC CS-1)
HCOB 19 May 69 HEALTH FORM, USE OF A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
AUDITING
(Ref: HCOB 24 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 5
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET
HCOB 4 Jul 78 New Era Dianetics Series 12
SECOND ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT)
HCOB 23 Jun 69 F/N
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 7 Jul 78 DIANETIC F/Ns)
HCOB 5 Oct 69 II DIANETIC TRIPLES
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 7811 New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS)
HCOB 27 Jan 70 NARRATIVE ITEMS EXPLAINED
(Ref: HCOB 18 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM)
HCOB 6 May 70 DIANETIC TRIPLES
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 7 Mar 71R C/S Series 28RA-IR
Rev. 25.7.78 USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS)
HCOB 2 Jun 70 FLOATING NEEDLES
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 7 Jul 78 DIANETIC F/Ns)
HCOB 1 Aug 70RA F/N AND ERASURE
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 7 Jul 78 DIANETIC F/Ns
HCOB 28 Apr 69 HIGH TA IN DIANETICS)
BTB 24 Apr 69RA PRECLEAR ASSESSMENT SHEET
(Ref: HCOB 24 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 5
ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT SHEET)
BTB 6 May 69RA ROUTINE 3R REVISED
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS)
BTB 14 Jul 70R ADDITIONAL DATA ON ERASING/SOLID
(Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 II New Era Dianetics Series 6
URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS)
BTB 25 Oct 71R II THE SPECIAL DRUG RUNDOWN-NOTE
(Ref: HCOB 15 Jul 71R III C/S Series 48RA
Rev. 27.6.78 New Era Dianetics Series 9
DRUG HANDLING
HCO PL 6 Jul 78 HUBBARD NEW ERA DIANETICS COURSE
CHECKSHEET-SECTION FOUR
(Entire section on Objectives) )
BTB 24 Nov 71R PRESSURE SOMATICS IN DIANETICS
(Ref: HCOB 18 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM)
BTB 28 Apr 74R DIANETICS CLEARING LISTS AND R3R
(Ref: HCOB 9 Jul 78 DIANETIC CS- 1 )
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo
Ref: HCOB 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24 METERING READING ITEMS
HCOB 8 Apr 78 AN F/N IS A READ
E-Meter Essentials, page 17 (ROCK SLAM)
HCOB 18 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
INSTANT READS
The correct definition of INSTANT READ is THAT REACTION OF THE NEEDLE
WHICH OCCURS AT THE PRECISE END OF ANY MAJOR THOUGHT VOICED BY THE AUDITOR.
All definitions which state it is fractions of seconds after the
question is asked, are cancelled.
Thus an instant read which occurs when the auditor assesses an item or
calls a question is valid and would be taken up and latent reads, which
occur fractions of seconds after the major thought, are ignored.
Additionally, when looking for reads while clearing commands or when
the preclear is originating items, the auditor must note only those reads
which occur at the exact moment the pc ends his statement of the item or
command.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo
HAVINGNESS
FINDING AND RUNNING THE PC'S HAVINGNESS PROCESS
Ref: HCOB 11 Jan 62, Security Checking Twenty-Ten Theory
HCOB 29 Sep 60, Havingness and Duplication
HCOB 6 Oct 60R, Thirty-Six New Presessions
Rev. 8 May 74
Book: E-Meter Essentials, Section G:
Finding Havingness & Confront Processes
NOTE: This issue is by no means a complete summary of the subject of
havingness. There is a vast amount of material on havingness and the remedy
of havingness in early publications and other HCOBs to be found in the
Technical Volumes-data the student will acquire as he continues to train up
the levels and on the SHSBC.
This issue is to give the beginning auditor a working knowledge of the
subject of havingness.
"HAVINGNESS: I) that which permits the experience of mass and pressure.
2) the feeling that one owns or possesses. 3) can be simply defined as ARC
with the environment.... 6) the ability to duplicate that which one
perceives, or to be willing to create a duplication of it.... 8) havingness
is the concept of being able to reach or not being prevented from
reaching.... 4) that activity which is run when needed and when it will not
violently deflect the pc's attention."
(From the Technical Dictionary.)
The above are all valid, but the final definition of havingness can be
simply stated as:
HAVINGNESS IS THE CONCEPT OF BEING ABLE TO REACH. NO HAVINGNESS IS THE
CONCEPT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO REACH.
Inherent in the ability to reach is the willingness and ability to
duplicate. That which makes communication work in processes is the
duplication part of the communication formula (Axiom 28 Amended).
The position of a being on the Tone Scale is determined by his ability
to reach (and thus his willingness and ability to duplicate, to communicate
and experience). The lower the tone of the being the less willing he is to
reach, communicate with and experience his present time environment, and
the less willing he is to reach and duplicate events of the past or permit
them to happen again.
This is remedied by Objective Havingness Processes. These are processes
that deal with observing and touching objects in the auditing room or in
the environment. They are "look around" or physical contact processes, used
to remedy a low or "no havingness" condition.
Thus we find the pc's Havingness Process early on in auditing and use
it to gain or remedy havingness before or after processes or at session
end.
FINDING AND RUNNING THE PC'S HAVINGNESS PROCESS
The preclear's Havingness Process is tested for on the meter in an
exact way. You test it on the needle with can squeezes from the pc.
Use HCOB 6 October 1960R, Revised 8 May 74, "Thirty-Six New
Presessions."
1. Set the sensitivity for 1/3 of a dial drop when the pc squeezes the
cans. (See E-Meter Drill 5, The Book of E-Meter Drills. )
2. Run 5 to 8 commands of the first Havingness Process on the above
bulletin, with the pc on the meter.
3. Then have the pc squeeze the cans, noting the size of the needle read
now. If this second can squeeze shows the needle looser (wider swing)
than the first can squeeze did, you've got it. The Havingness Process
you've tested is the Havingness Process for the preclear and may be
used to remedy his havingness as necessary.
4. If the process tightens the needle during the test, don't use it.
Don't bridge off. Just get off the process now and test the next
process, or the next, continuing until you find a Havingness Process
that does loosen the needle and gives a wider swing. One will be found
among the list of Havingness Processes on HCOB 6 Oct 60R.
5. The correct Havingness Process selected is then run 10 to 12 commands
at a time, usually just before ending off a session.
A pc's Havingness Process can change as the pc changes with auditing.
If at some point in the auditing the Havingness Process which has been
being used fails to get the desired result, simply re-test for a new
Havingness Process, find one that works and use it.
Even the right Havingness Process, if run too much at one time (more
than 10 or 20 commands) will start running the bank. It doesn't harm the
preclear but that isn't its use, as there are other processes that run the
bank better.
The purpose of a Havingness Process is to get the preclear stabilized
in his environment.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo Issue I
New Era Dianetics
Expanded Dianetics
Courses
C/Ses
Auditors
Supers
Students
NEW ERA DIANETICS
A REQUISITE FOR EXPANDED DIANETICS
(Ref: New Era Dianetics Series Bulletins
Expanded Dianetics Series Bulletins)
THE NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM MUST COME BEFORE EXPANDED
DIANETICS ON ANY PC WHO HASN'T HAD NEW ERA DIANETICS .
Thus:
THE NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM AND EXPANDED DIANETICS, IN THAT
SEQUENCE, ARE MANDATORY IN EVERY R/S CASE.
The New Era Dianetics Full Pc Program is itself. The Expanded Dianetics
Program is itself. They are NOT mixed. The one quite naturally precedes the
other. New Era Dianetics fully completed paves the way for smooth, rapid,
spot-on running of Expanded Dianetics on the pc.
On those pcs who have already had many hours of Dianetics, numerous
chains will have been erased with somatics and/or illnesses blown and
disabilities handled, and these gains are not to be invalidated. Dianetics
properly applied has always brought about fantastic results.
New Era Dianetics, however, with its new Preassessment procedure and
its new rundowns tailored to find and handle any unhandled Dianetic aspect
of the case, will result in undreamed of gains for old and new pcs alike.
It is already doing so.
Further, it ensures the full and thorough handling of those aspects of
the case which must be gotten out of the way before proceeding with Ex Dn,
as these could complicate and lengthen Ex Dn unnecessarily.
Thus we have the above rules.
This is a swifter and more thorough route than ever before to a well
and happy pc and a swifter more thorough route than ever before to a full
Expanded Dianetics completion .
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
(Cancels BTB 2 May 72R, Rev. 10.6.74,
CLEARING COMMANDS.)
CLEARING COMMANDS
(Ref: HCOB 14 Nov 65, CLEARING COMMANDS
HCOB 9 Nov 68, CLEARING COMMANDS, ALL LEVELS
HCO PL 4 Apr 72R ETHICS AND STUDY TECH)
Always when running a process newly or whenever the preclear is
confused about the meaning of commands, clear each word of each command
with the preclear. using the dictionary if necessary. This has long been
standard procedure.
You want a pc set up to run smoothly, knowing what is expected of him
and understanding exactly the question being asked or the command being
given. A misunderstood word or auditing command can waste hours of auditing
time and keep a whole case from moving.
Thus this preliminary step to running a process or procedure for the
first time is VITAL.
The rules of clearing commands are:
1. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE AUDITOR TO EVALUATE FOR THE PC AND TELL
HIM WHAT THE WORD OR COMMAND MEANS.
2. ALWAYS HAVE THE NECESSARY (AND GOOD) DICTIONARIES IN THE AUDITING
ROOM WITH YOU.
This would include the Tech Dictionary, the Admin Dictionary, a good
English dictionary, and a good non-dinky dictionary in the pc's native
language. For a foreign language case (where the pc's native language
is not English) you will also need a dual dictionary for that language
and English.
(Example: English word "apple" is looked up in English/French
dictionary and "pomme" is found. Now look in the French dictionary to
define "pomme.")
So for the foreign language case two dictionaries are needed: (1)
English to foreign language (2) foreign language itself.
3. HAVE THE PC ON THE CANS THROUGHOUT THE CLEARING OF THE WORDS AND
COMMANDS.
4. CLEAR THE COMMAND (OR QUESTION OR LIST ITEM) BACKWARDS BY FIRST
CLEARING IN TURN EACH WORD IN THE COMMAND IN BACKWARDS SEQUENCE.
(Example: To clear the command "Do fish swim?" clear "swim" first,
then "fish," then "do.")
This prevents the pc starting to run the process by himself while you
are still clearing the words.
4A. NOTE: F/Ns OBTAINED ON CLEARING THE WORDS DOES NOT MEAN THE
PROCESS HAS BEEN RUN.
5. NEXT, CLEAR THE COMMAND ITSELF.
Auditor asks the pc, "What does this command mean to you?" If it is
evident from the pc's answer that he has misunderstood a word as it is
used in the context of the command:
(a) Re-clear the obvious word (or words) using the dictionary.
(b) Have him use each word in a sentence until he has it. (The
worst fault is the pc using a new set of words in place of the
actual word and answering the alter-ised word, not the word itself.
See HCOB 10 Mar 65, WORDS, MISUNDERSTOOD GOOFS.)
(c) Re-clear the command.
(d) If necessary, repeat Steps a, b and c above to make sure he
understands the command.
5A. NOTE: THAT A WORD READS WHEN CLEARING A COMMAND, AN ASSESSMENT QUESTION
OR LISTING QUESTION DOES NOT MEAN THE COMMAND OR QUESTION ITSELF HAS
READ NECESSARILY. MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS READ ON THE METER.
6. WHEN CLEARING THE COMMAND, WATCH THE METER AND NOTE ANY READ ON THE
COMMAND. (Ref: HCOB 28 Feb 71, C/S Series 24, IMPORTANT METERING
READING ITEMS.)
7. DON'T CLEAR THE COMMANDS OF ALL RUDS AND RUN THEM, OR OF ALL
PROCESSES AND RUN THEM. YOU'LL MISS F/Ns. THE COMMANDS OF ONE PROCESS
ARE CLEARED JUST BEFORE THAT PROCESS IS RUN.
8. ARC BREAKS AND LISTS SHOULD BE WORD CLEARED BEFORE A PC GETS INTO
THEM AND SHOULD BE TAGGED IN THE PC'S FOLDER ON A YELLOW SHEET AS
CLEARED. (Ref: BTB 5 Nov 72R II, Rev. 24.7.74, Auditor Admin Series 6R,
THE YELLOW SHEET.)
As it is difficult to clear all the words of a correction list on a
pc over heavy bypassed charge, it is standard to clear the words of an
L1C and ruds very early in auditing and to clear an L4BRA before
commencing listing processes or an L3RE before running R3RA. Then, when
the need for these correction lists arises one does not need to clear
all the words as it has already been done. Thus, such correction lists
can be used without delay.
It is also standard to clear the words of the Word Clearing
Correction List early in auditing and before other correction lists are
cleared. This way, if the pc bogs on subsequent Word Clearing, you have
your Word Clearing Correction List ready to use.
9. IF, HOWEVER, YOUR PC IS SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF AN ARC BREAK (OR
OTHER HEAVY CHARGE) AND THE WORDS OF THE L1C (OR OTHER CORRECTION LIST)
HAVE NOT BEEN CLEARED YET, DON'T CLEAR FIRST. GO AHEAD AND ASSESS THE
LIST TO HANDLE THE CHARGE. OTHERWISE IT'S AUDITING OVER AN ARC BREAK.
In this case you just verify by asking afterwards if he had any
misunderstoods on the list.
All the words of the L1C (or other correction list) would then be
cleared thoroughly at the first opportunity-per your C/S's
instructions.
10. DO NOT RE-CLEAR ALL THE WORDS OF ASSESSMENT LISTS EACH TIME THE LIST
IS USED ON THE SAME PC. Do it once, fully and properly the first time
and note clearly in the folder, on the yellow sheet for future
reference, which of the- standard assessment lists have been cleared.
11. THESE RULES APPLY TO ALL PROCESSES, LISTING QUESTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS
.
12. THE WORDS OF THE PLATENS OF ADVANCED COURSE MATERIALS ARE NOT SO
CLEARED.
____________
Any violation of full and correct clearing of commands or assessment
questions, whether done in a formal session or not, is an ethics offense
per HCO PL 4 Apr 72R (Rev. 21.6.75) ETHICS AND STUDY TECH, Section 4, which
states:
"ANY AUDITOR FAILING TO CLEAR EACH AND EVERY WORD OF EVERY COMMAND OR
LIST USED MAY BE SUMMONED BEFORE A COURT OF ETHICS.
"The charge is OUT TECH."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 AUGUST 1978
Issue I
Remimeo
All Auditors
RUDIMENTS
DEFINITIONS AND PATTER
(Ref: HCOB 15 Aug 69, FLYING RUDS)
(NOTE: This Bulletin in no way summarizes all the data there is to be
known about ARC breaks, PTPs and missed withholds, or handling
rudiments.
There is a wealth of technology and data on these subjects contained
throughout the Technical Volumes and in Scientology books which the
student auditor will need as he progresses up the levels.)
A rudiment is that which is used to get the pc in shape to be audited
in that session.
For auditing to take place at all the pc must be in session which
means:
1. Willing to talk to the auditor
2. Interested in own case.
That is all you want to accomplish with rudiments. You want to set up
the case to run by getting the rudiments in, not use the rudiments to run
the case.
ARC breaks, present time problems and withholds all keep a session from
occurring. It is elementary auditing knowledge that auditing over the top
of an ARC break can reduce a graph, hang the pc up in sessions or worsen
his case, and that in the presence of PTPs, overts and missed withholds (a
restimulated undisclosed overt) no gains can occur. Thus these are the
rudiments we are most concerned with getting in at the beginning of a
session so that auditing with gains can occur.
GETTING THE F/N
If you know bank structure you know it is necessary to find an earlier
item if something does not release.
If a rud doesn't F/N then there is an earlier (or an earlier or an
earlier) lock which is preventing it from F/Ning.
Thus we have the procedure and the rule:
IF A RUD READS YOU ALWAYS TAKE IT EARLIER SIMILAR UNTIL IT F/Ns.
The question used is:
"Is there an earlier similar (ARC break) or (problem) or (missed
withhold)?"
If at the beginning of a session the rudiments are in (the needle is
floating and the pc is VGIs), the auditor goes directly into the major
actions of the session. If not, the auditor must fly a rud or ruds, as
ordered by the C/S.
ARC BREAKS
ARC: A word from the initial letters of Affinity, Reality and
Communication which together equate to Understanding.
ARC BREAK: A sudden drop or cutting of one's affinity, reality or
communication with someone or something. Upsets with people or
things come about because of a lessening or sundering of
affinity, reality, communication or understanding.
While the earlier similar rule fully applies to ARC breaks, there is an
additional action taken in handling ARC breaks that enables the pc to spot
precisely what happened that resulted in the upset.
An ARC break is called that-an "A-R-C break"-instead of an upset
because, if one discovers which of the three points of understanding have
been cut, one can bring about a rapid recovery in the person's state of
mind.
You never audit over the top of an ARC break, and you never audit an
ARC break itself; they cannot be audited. But they can be assessed to
locate which of the basic elements of ARC the charge is on.
Thus to handle an ARC break you assess affinity, reality, communication
and understanding to find which of these points the break occurred on.
Having determined that, you assess the item found (A or R or C or U)
against the Expanded CDEI Scale (curious, desired, enforced, inhibited, no
and refused). Ref: HCOB 13 Oct 59, DEI EXPANDED SCALE, Scientology S8. The
Book of Basics, and HCOB 18 Sep 67, corrected 4.4.74, SCALES.
With this assessment the actual bypassed charge can be located and
indicated even more accurately, thus enabling the pc to blow it.
The assessment is done on every ARC break as you go earlier similar
until the rudiment is in with F/N and VGIs.
The first rudiment question is:
1. "Do you have an ARC break?"
2. If there is an ARC break, get the data on it briefly.
3. Find out by assessment which point the ARC break occurred on:
"Was that a break in Affinity?
Reality?
Communication?
Understanding?"
You assess it once and get the read (or the largest read) on, say,
communication.
4. Check it with the pc: "Was that a break in (communication)? If
he says no, rehandle. If yes, let him tell you about it if he
wishes. Then give it to him by indicating it, i.e. "I'd like to
indicate that was a break in communication."
PROVIDED THE RIGHT ITEM HAS BEEN GOTTEN, the pc will brighten up,
even if ever so slightly, on the very first assessment.
NOTE: On Step 4 the pc may originate: "Yes, I guess it was
communication but to me it's really more like a break in reality,"
for example. The wise auditor then acknowledges and indicates it
was a break in "reality."
5. Taking the item found in Step 4 above, assess it against the
CDEI Scale:
"Was it:
Curious about (communication) ?
Desired " ?
Enforced " ?
Inhibited " ?
No " ?
Refused " ?"
6. As in Steps 3 and 4 above, assess it once, get the item and check it
with the pc:
"Was it (desired) communication?"
If no, rehandle. If yes, indicate it.
7. If no F/N at this point you follow it earlier with the question:
"Is there an earlier similar ARC break?"
8. Get the earlier similar ARC break, get in ARCU, CDEINR, indicate. If
no F/N, repeat Step 7, continuing to go earlier, always using ARCU,
CDEINR until you get an F/N.
When you get the F/N and VGIs you have it.
PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
PROBLEM: A conflict arising from two opposing intentions. It's one thing
versus another thing; an intention-counter-intention that
worries the preclear.
PRESENT TIME PROBLEM: . . . A special problem that exists in the physical
universe now, on which the pc has his attention fixed.
. . . Any set of circumstances that so engages the attention of
the preclear that he feels he should be doing something about
it instead of being audited.
A violation of "in session-ness" occurs when the pc's attention is
fixed on some concern that is "right now" in the physical universe. The
pc's attention is "over there" not on his case. If the auditor overlooks
and doesn't handle the PTP then the pc is never in session, grows agitated,
ARC breaks. And no gains are made because he is not in session.
The second rudiment question is:
1. "Do you have a present time problem?"
2. If there is a PTP, have the pc tell you about it.
3. If no F/N take it earlier with the question:
"Is there an earlier similar problem?"
4. Get the earlier problem and if no F/N, follow it earlier
similar, earlier similar, earlier similar to F/N.
MISSED WITHHOLDS
OVERT ACT: An intentionally committed harmful act committed in an effort
to solve a problem.
. . . an act of omission or commission which does the least
good for the least number of dynamics or the most harm to the
greatest number of dynamics.
That thing which you do which you aren't willing to have happen
to you.
WITHHOLD: An undisclosed harmful (contra-survival) act. Something the pc
did that he isn't talking about.
MISSED WITHHOLD: An undisclosed contra-survival act which has been
restimulated by another but not disclosed. This is a withhold
which another person nearly found out about, leaving the person
with the withhold in a state of wondering whether his hidden
deed is known or not.
The pc with a missed withhold will not be honestly "willing to talk to
the auditor" and, therefore, not in session until the missed withhold is
pulled.
Missing a withhold or not getting all of it is the sole source of an
ARC break. A missed withhold is observable by any of the following: pc not
making progress, pc critical of, nattery or angry at the auditor, refusing
to talk to the auditor, not desirous of being audited, boiling off,
exhausted, foggy at session end, dropped havingness, telling others the
auditor is no good, demanding redress of wrongs, critical of Scientology or
organizations or people of Scientology, lack of auditing results,
dissemination failures. (Ref: HCOB 3 May 62, ARC BREAKS, MISSED WITHHOLDS.)
The auditor must not overlook any manifestations of a missed withhold.
Thus, if the pc has a missed withhold you get it, get all of it using
the system described below, and use the same system on each earlier similar
missed withhold until you get the F/N.
The third rudiment question is:
1. "Has a withhold been missed?"
2. If you get a missed withhold, find out:
(a) What was it?
(b) When was it?
(c) Is that all of the withhold?
(d) WHO missed it?
(e) What did (he/she) do to make you wonder whether or not
(he/she) knew?
(f) Who else missed it? (Repeat (e) above).
Get another and another who missed it, using the Suppress
button as necessary, and repeating (e) above.
3. Clean it to F/N, or if no F/N take it earlier similar with the
question:
"Is there an earlier similar missed withhold?"
4. Handle each earlier similar missed withhold you get per Step 2
above, until you get an F/N.
SUPPRESS
If a rudiment doesn't read and is not F/Ning, put in the Suppress
button, using:
"On the question 'Do you have an ARC break?' has anything been
suppressed?"
If it reads, take it and ask ARCU, CDEINR, earlier similar, etc.
Use Suppress in the same way for non-reading PTP and missed withhold
rudiments.
FALSE
If the pc protests, comments, or seems bewildered put in the False
button. The question used is:
"Has anyone said you had a when you didn't have one?" Get who, what,
when and take it earlier, if necessary, to F/N.
END PHENOMENA
In ruds when you've got your F/N and that charge has moved off,
indicate it. Don't push the pc on for some other "EP."
When the pc F/Ns with VGIs, you've got it.
HIGH OR LOW TA
Never try to fly ruds on a high or low TA.
Seeing a high or low TA at session start, the Dianetic or Scientology
auditor up to Class II does not start the session but sends the folder back
to the C/S for a higher classed auditor to handle. The C/S will order the
required correction list to be done by an auditor Class III or above.
____________
REFERENCES:
HCOB 15 Aug 69 FLYING RUDS
HCOB 13 Oct 59 DEI EXPANDED SCALE
HCOB 18 Sep 67 SCALES
HCOB 7 Sep 64 II ALL LEVELS, PTPS, OVERTS
AND ARC BREAKS
HCOB 12 Feb 62 HOW TO CLEAR WITHHOLDS &
MISSED WITHHOLDS
HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
HCOB 14 Mar 71R F/N EVERYTHING
HCOB 23 Aug 71 C/S Series 1 AUDITOR'S RIGHTS
HCOB 21 Mar 74 END PHENOMENA
HCOB 22 Feb 62 WITHHOLDS, MISSED & PARTIAL
HCOB 3 May 62 ARC BREAKS, MISSED WITHHOLDS
The above issues give further data on rudiments, ARC breaks, PTPs and
missed withholds. Note, however, that this is not a complete list of
references on the subject. There is much additional data to be found in the
Technical Volumes.
LRH:dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo Issue II
All Auditors
(Cancels BTB 18 Nov 68R, MODEL SESSION)
MODEL SESSION
(Note: If a Dianetic or Level 0, I, II auditor is not trained in
flying rudiments he would have to get a Level III (or above) auditor
to fly the pc's ruds before starting the major action of the
session.)
1. Setting Up for the Session
Prior to the session the auditor is to make sure the room and session
are set up, to ensure a smooth session with no interruptions or
distractions.
Use HCOB 4 December 1977, "Checklist for Setting Up Sessions and An E-
Meter," getting in every point of the checklist.
The pc is seated in the chair furthest from the door. From the time he
is asked to pick up the cans he remains on the meter until the end of the
session.
When it is established there is no reason not to begin the session the
auditor starts the session.
2. Start of Session
The auditor says: "This is the session." (Tone 40.)
If the needle is floating and the pc has VGIs, the auditor goes
directly into the major action of the session. If not, the auditor must fly
a rud.
3. Rudiments
Rudiments are handled per HCOB 11 August 1978, Issue I, "Rudiments,
Definitions and Patter."
(If the TA is high or low at session start, or if the auditor cannot
get a rud to fly, he ends off and sends the pc folder to the C/S. A Class
IV auditor (or above) may do a Green Form or another type of correction
list.)
When the pc has F/N, VGIs the auditor goes into the major action of the
session.
4. Major Action of the Session
a) R-Factor to the pc. The auditor informs the pc what is going to be
done in the session with:
"Now we are going to handle ."
b) Clearing commands. The commands of the process are cleared per HCOB
9 August 1978 Issue II, "Clearing Commands."
c) The process. The auditor runs the process or completes the C/S
instructions for the session to end phenomena.
In Dianetics, the end phenomena would be: F/N, erasure of the chain,
cognition, postulate (if not voiced in the cognition) and VGIs.
In Scientology processes, the end phenomena is: F/N, cognition, VGIs. The
Power Processes have their own EP.
5. Havingness
When Havingness is indicated or included in the C/S instructions, the
auditor runs approximately 10 to 12 commands of the pc's Havingness Process
to where the pc is bright, F/Ning and in PT. (Note: Havingness is never run
to obscure or hide the fact of failure to F/N the main process or an
auditing or Confessional question.)
(Ref: HCOB 7 August 78, "Havingness, Finding & Running The Pc's
Havingness Process. ")
6. End of Session
a) When the auditor is ready to end the session he gives the R-Factor
that he will be ending the session.
b) Then he asks: "Is there anything you would care to say or ask before
I end this session?" Pc answers. Auditor acknowledges and notes down the
answer.
c) If the pc asks a question, answer it if you can or acknowledge and
say, "I will note that down for the C/S."
d) Auditor ends the session with: "End of session." (Tone 40.)
(Note: The phrase "That's it" is incorrect for the purpose of ending a
session and is not used. The correct phrase is "End of Session.")
_________
Immediately after the end of session the auditor or a Page takes the pc
to the pc Examiner.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 AUGUST 1978
Remimeo
All Auditors
All C/Ses
RUNNING FLOWS THAT WON'T ERASE
You can run into trouble in R3RA with a flow that won't erase and this
can be due to an earlier unerased flow.
You can be running a flow and it won't erase because you have left an
earlier flow unerased.
You have to go back and erase the unerased flow and then return to the
one you are working on, which will then erase.
If you are on Flow 2 and find it won't erase because Flow 1 has been
left unerased, the thing to do is go back to Flow 1 and fully erase it.
Then return to Flow 2.
What you are running into on the flow that won't erase is generally the
earlier unerased flow and that is what you need to handle to obtain a clean
erasure.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 AUGUST 1978R
REVISED 5 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
MORE ON DRUGS
Drug users are apparently sitting on the idea that if you're numb
nothing can hurt you and it's probably a defense against the physical
universe. That's probably why Objectives pull them out of it.
Drugs are an impression of fear on the physical universe and what it
might do to a person.
That is why Objectives work. It reassures them they aren't going to get
bit.
That's the ambition of the drug culture.
There are several more sensible ways of handling the same problem.
The first of these is exteriorization. One exteriorizes before the
impact. Yet drugs often make it impossible to exteriorize.
A second way is to simply control the nerves so they don't transmit.
A third is not to be in such a protest against pain as it increases the
intensity of the thing. It is a fact that pain is a sort of havingness and
if a person is processed on wasting and having pain he finds it is just
another sensation and he can have it and doesn't need these other remedies
and that it is not that much of a problem.
There are other unwanted sensations that drugs block off but there is a
whole sector of desirable sensations and drugs block off all sensations. In
spite of the propaganda to the contrary even sexual sensation is blocked
off with drugs and this is true even after drugs have apparently heightened
it for one or two times, after that it is dead, dead, dead.
The only brief that can be held out for drugs is that they give a short
quick oblivion from immediate agony and permit the handling of a person to
effect repair. But even then this is applicable to persons who have no
other system to handle their pain.
Dexterity, ability and alertness are the main things that prevent
getting into painful situations and a primary target of these all vanish
with drugs. So drugs set you up to get into situations which are truly
disastrous and keep you that way.
One has a choice between being dead with drugs or being alive without
them. Drugs rob life of the sensations and joys which are the only reasons
for living anyhow.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gi.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
HCOs
Tech Staff (Cancels HCOB 5 Dec AD12 "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21
Qual Staff and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment.")
Confessional Courses (Cancels HCOB 13 Aug AD12)
All Auditors, (Cancels HCOB 1 Aug AD12)
C/Ses, Supervisors
URGENT-URGENT-URGENT
DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
The following is the only valid definition of an R/S:
ROCK SLAM: THE CRAZY, IRREGULAR, LEFT-RIGHT SLASHING MOTION OF THE
NEEDLE ON THE E-METER DIAL. R/SES REPEAT LEFT AND RIGHT
SLASHES UNEVENLY AND SAVAGELY, FASTER THAN THE EYE EASILY
FOLLOWS. THE NEEDLE IS FRANTIC. THE WIDTH OF AN R/S DEPENDS
LARGELY ON SENSITIVITY SETTING. IT GOES FROM ONE-FOURTH
INCH TO WHOLE DIAL. BUT IT SLAMS BACK AND FORTH.
A ROCK SLAM (R/S) MEANS A HIDDEN EVIL INTENTION ON THE SUBJECT OR
QUESTION UNDER AUDITING OR DISCUSSION.
VALID R/SES ARE NOT ALWAYS INSTANT READS. AN R/S CAN READ PRIOR OR
LATENTLY.
HCOB 5 December AD12, "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21 and Routine 2-10 Modern
Assessment" is an HCOB composited by others incorrectly and is CANCELLED as
it misdefines an R/S as a single slash left or right. It contains the
statements: "One or two slashes make an R/S.... If it slashed up or down
once call it an R/S." The data is utterly false. By this wrong definition a
rocket read could be mistaken for an R/S, or any sudden rise could be
mistaken for an R/S. ONE SLASH DOESN'T BEGIN TO BE AN R/S. NOR TWO OR THREE
FOR THAT MATTER. THE CORRECT DEFINITION OF AN R/S INCLUDES THAT IT SLASHES
SAVAGELY LEFT AND RIGHT.
DEFINITION OF A DIRTY NEEDLE
The following is the only valid definition of a dirty needle:
DIRTY NEEDLE: AN ERRATIC AGITATION OF THE NEEDLE WHICH IS RAGGED,
JERKY, TICKING, NOT SWEEPING, AND TENDS TO BE PERSISTENT.
IT IS NOT LIMITED IN SIZE.
A DIRTY NEEDLE IS CAUSED BY ONE OF THREE THINGS:
1. THE AUDITOR'S TRs ARE BAD.
2. THE AUDITOR IS BREAKING THE AUDITOR'S CODE.
3. THE PC HAS WITHHOLDS HE DOES NOT WISH KNOWN.
The definitions of a dirty needle as "a small rock slam" and "a smaller
edition of the rock slam" in HCOB 13 August AD12, "Rock Slams and Dirty
Needles," are CANCELLED. The definition of a dirty needle as "a minute rock
slam" in HCOB 1 August AD12, "Routine 3GA, Goals, Nulling by Mid Ruds," is
CANCELLED.
All definitions which limit the size of a dirty needle to "one quarter
of an inch" or "less than one quarter of an inch" are CANCELLED.
A dirty needle is NOT TO BE CONFUSED with an R/S. They are distinctly
different reads. You never mistake an R/S if you have ever seen one. A
dirty needle is far less frantic.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A ROCK SLAM AND A DIRTY NEEDLE IS IN THE
CHARACTER OF THE READ. NOT THE SIZE.
Persistent use of "fish and fumble" can sometimes turn a dirty needle
into a rock slam. However until it does it is simply a dirty needle.
AUDITORS, C/SES, SUPERVISORS MUST MUST MUST KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
THESE TWO TYPES OF READS COLD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses
ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
Ref: HCOB 22 Jul 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT
HCOB I Sep 63 SCIENTOLOGY THREE CLEARING,
CLEARING, CLEARING, ROUTINE THREE SC
HCOB 23 Aug 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 30 Nov 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES
TAPE: 6308C27 SH SPEC 299 RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE
TAPE: 6309C03 SH SPEC 302A R3SC
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
TAPE: 6309C18 SH SPEC 308 ST HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING
FACSIMILE: A mental picture unknowingly created; a copy of the physical
universe environment, complete with all the perceptions, at
some time in the past.
SERVICE: A method of providing a person with the use of something; the
action or result of giving assistance or advantage; work done;
duty performed.
COMPUTATION: That aberrated evaluation and postulate that one must be
in a certain state in order to succeed.
SERVICE FACSIMILE: THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS THAT COMPUTATION GENERATED BY
THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO MAKE SELF RIGHT AND
OTHERS WRONG: TO DOMINATE OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND
ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS.
Note that it is a computation, not a doingness, beingness or
havingness. We could call this a "service computation" but we will maintain
the term we have used to describe this phenomenon throughout the
technology: "service facsimile."
It is a computation that the pc adopted when, in an extreme situation,
he felt endangered by something but could not itsa it.
It is called a service facsimile because he uses it; it is "of service"
to him.
Aberration, anybody's aberration on any subject, has been of some use
to them at some time or other. You can trace it back. It's been of some
use, otherwise they wouldn't keep mocking it up. But now, if you put it up
against survival standards, you'd find it very non-survival.
The pc adopted this because he couldn't stand the confusion in a
situation. So he adopted a safe solution. A safe solution is always adopted
as a retreat from the environmental restimulation. He adopted a safe
solution in that instance and he survived. His safe solution became his
stable datum. He has hung onto it ever since. It is the computation, the
fixed idea, he uses to handle life, his service facsimile.
HOW THE SERVICE FACSIMILE BECOMES FIXED
An idea is the thing most easily substituted for a thetan. An idea
doesn't have any mass connected with it basically. And it appears to have
some wisdom in it so it's very easily substituted for a thetan. Thus the
idea, the stable datum he has adopted, is substituted for the thetan.
How does this stable datum become so fixed? It gets fixed, and more and
more firmly as time goes on, by the confusion it is supposed to handle but
doesn't.
The stable datum was adopted in lieu of inspection. The person ceased
to inspect, he fell back from inspecting, he fell back from living. He put
the datum there to substitute for his own observation and his own coping
with life, and at that moment he started an accumulation of confusion.
That which is not confronted and inspected tends to persist. Thus in
the absence of his own confronting mass collects. The stable datum forbids
inspection. It's an automatic solution. It's "safe." It solves everything.
He no longer has to inspect to solve, so he never anises the mass. He gets
caught in the middle of the mass. And it collects more and more confusion
and his ability to inspect becomes less and less. The more he isn't
confronting, the less he can confront. This becomes a dwindling spiral.
So the thing he has adopted to handle his environment for him is the
thing which reduces his ability to handle his environment.
Those things which do not respond to routine auditing, that routine
auditing won't change, are rooted in this mechanism.
Therefore, it is important to find the idea on which he is so fixed.
Pull the fixed idea and you free the individual for a broader perimeter of
inspection.
In service fac handling the reason you get tone arm action when the
fixed idea has been pulled is that the confusion which has been amassed and
dammed up for so long is now running off.
RIGHT/WRONG, DOMINATE AND SURVIVE
Right and wrong are the tools of survival. In order to survive you have
to be right. There is a level at which true rightness is analytical, and
there is a level at which rightness and wrongness cease to be analytical or
comprehensible. When it drops below that point it's aberration.
The point you degenerate from survive to succumb is the point you
recognize you are wrong. That is the beginning of succumb. The moment one
becomes worried about his own survival he enters into the necessity to
dominate in order to survive.
It goes: the insistence upon survival, followed by the necessity to
dominate, followed then by the necessity to be right. These postulates go
downhill. So you get an aberrated rightness or wrongness. The game of
domination consists of making the other fellow wrong in order to be right.
That is the essence of the service facsimile.
The reason the service facsimile isn't rational is because you have
A=A=As along the whole line. Coming down the line it works itself back and
forth in an aberrated A=A=A. If the individual is surviving he must be
right. And people will defend the most fantastic wrongnesses on the basis
they are being right.
In PT and at any point along the track, the fellow is trying to be
right, trying to be right, trying to be right. Whatever he's doing he's
trying to be right. In order to survive
you have to be right more than you're wrong, so you get the obsession to be
right in order to survive. The lie is that he can't do anything else except
survive.
It isn't that trying to be right is wrong-it's obsessively being right
about something that's obviously wrong. That's when the individual is no
longer able to select his own course of behaviour. When he is obsessively
following courses of behaviour which are uninspected in order to be right.
There is nothing sane about a service facsimile, there is no
rationality to it. The computation does not fit the incident or event
occurring. It simply enforces, exaggerates and destroys freedom of choice
over the exercise of ability to be happy or powerful or normal or active.
It destroys power, destroys freedom of choice.
Wherever that zone or area is you'll see the individual worsening. He
is on a dwindling spiral. But he himself is generating it.
The intention to be right is the strongest intention in the universe.
Above it you have the effort to dominate and above that you have the effort
to survive. These things are strong. But we're talking here about a mental
activity. A thinking activity. An intentional activity.
Survival-that just happens. Domination-that just happens. Those are not
intended things. But you get down along the level of intended and it's
right or wrong. The strongest intention in the universe.
It is always an aberrated solution. It always exists in PT and is part
of the environment of the pc. He's generating it. It's his solution.
Overwhelmed as he is by it, he is still generating it. It's aberrated
because it's an uninspected solution. And it is something that everyone
unintentionally or otherwise is telling the pc is wrong and causing him to
assert that it is right. The perfect solution when he first got hold of it.
But now it monitors his life; it's living his life for him. And it doesn't
even vaguely begin to take care of his life.
That is the anatomy of the service facsimile.
You are going to find these on any pc you audit. A service facsimile is
the clue, the key to a pc's case. The route to succumb which he blindly
asserts is his route to survival. And every pc has more than one of these.
Fortunately, we have the tech to salvage him. We are the only ones who
do.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Tech Staff
Qual Staff
HCOs
Confessional Courses
Level II Checksheets
All Auditors.
Supers. C/Ses
FOLLOWING UP ON DIRTY NEEDLES
(Ref: HCOB 3 Sep 78 DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
HCOB 28 Jun 62 DIRTY NEEDLES
HCOB 17 May 69 TRs AND DIRTY NEEDLES
E-Meter Drills
17, 20, 21: THE BOOK OF E-METER DRILLS
TAPE: 6205C23
SH TVD-7 FISH & FUMBLE, CHECKING DIRTY NEEDLES.)
_________
The only valid definition of a dirty needle is given in HCOB 3
September 78, DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM, as:
"DIRTY NEEDLE: AN ERRATIC AGITATION OF THE NEEDLE WHICH IS RAGGED,
JERKY, TICKING, NOT SWEEPING, AND TENDS TO BE
PERSISTENT. IT IS NOT LIMITED IN SIZE."
It is caused by one of three things: 1) the auditor's TRs are bad or 2)
the auditor is breaking the Auditor's Code or 3) the pc has withholds he
does not wish known.
The definitions are pointed up in the above HCOB because it is vital
not to confuse a dirty needle with an R/S. They are distinctly different
reads. The difference is in the character of the read: it has nothing to do
with size.
Auditors, supervisors and C/Ses must understand the difference between
these two reads and must be able to recognize each instantly when they
occur.
Because of the underlying causes of these two different types of reads
they are both most apt to appear when Confessionals are being done or when
areas of O/Ws are being addressed. But they are different and the auditor
must know the difference cold.
A dirty needle must not be ignored especially when doing any type of
Confessional action.
If the auditor's TRs are in and he is maintaining the Auditor's Code, a
dirty needle, taken up, will either clean or turn into an R/S. It is not to
be overlooked.
The dirty needle is your hottest string to pull in finding and turning
on an R/S. Whatever is behind it, ignoring it will cut the comm line
between auditor and pc and wreck the auditing comm cycle.
The area that is producing a dirty needle, when questioned to get full
data, will either clean or go into an R/S.
The area is considered clean when you can go over the area that gave
the dirty needle and it no longer produces a dirty needle.
If it still produces a dirty needle then there is more to the withhold
itself or something the pc isn't voicing about the withhold or how he feels
about the withhold, or the auditor's TRs are terrible, but-pursued and
taken up with auditor's TRs in- this dirty needle will either turn into an
R/S or it will fully clean. Until it does, however, it is still a dirty
needle.
The procedure for fishing a read is covered in AUDITING DEMO TAPE
6205C23 SH TVD-7, "FISH AND FUMBLE, CHECKING DIRTY NEEDLES." Cleaning a
dirty needle is covered in E-Meter Drills 17, 20 and 21 as well, and Class
II auditors and above should be very adept at this.
The rule is: DON'T IGNORE DIRTY NEEDLES. ALWAYS FOLLOW THEM UP.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mf
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
Level IV
Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses
SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS
Reference: HCOB 5 Sep 78 Anatomy Of A Service Facsimile
HCOB 1 Sep 63 Scientology Three Clearing, Clearing,
Clearing, Routine Three SC
HCOB 6 Sep 78 Urgent, Important, Routine Three
Issue III SC-A, Full Service Facsimile Handling
Updated With New Era Dianetics
TAPE: 6308C27 SH SPEC 299 Rightness & Wrongness
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 How To Find a Service
Facsimile
TAPE: 6309C03 SH SPEC 302A R3SC
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 Service Facsimile Assessment
TAPE: 6309C18 SH SPEC 308 St. Hill Service Fac Handling
HCOB 3 Sep 78 Definition Of A Rock Slam
HCOB 10 Aug 76R R/Ses, What They Mean
__________
A service facsimile is a brother to R/Ses and evil intentions.
This is easily seen when one understands the anatomy of the service fac
and the right/wrong, dominate and survive computations that enter into it.
And when one understands that an R/S always means a hidden, evil intention
and that the total reason for an R/S is to make wrong. In order to get
someone to succumb they have to be wrong.
Way back up there the idea preceding the service fac was right, really
right. Then it came down a bit and was a method of survival and then it was
a method of dominating and then it was a method of being right in order to
make others wrong.
And in that contest one got enough overts so that the communication
line took a switcheroo. What was right about it is now wrong about it and
what was once wrong is now right. A=A=A enters into the situation where
rightness becomes wrongness. All of his overts get piled up on one of these
fixed ideas, or what we call a service facsimile.
It isn't actually a facsimile at all. It's the guy himself keeping
facsimiles in restimulation because he "knows" what's best. The person
himself is generating the fixed idea; it is not the bank.
It isn't what aberration the individual is dramatizing. It's what
aberration does the individual dredge up in order to make somebody wrong.
It isn't the accidental thing you think it is. It's intended.
The intention is to be right and make others wrong, to dominate others
and escape domination oneself, to aid own survival and hinder the survival
of others. That is the service fac-blood brother to the hidden, evil
intention that is behind the rock slam.
This does not mean you will necessarily see R/Ses on every service fac
you run. It does mean that WHERE A PC IS R/SING IN AN AREA YOU HAVE AN AREA
OF A HEAVY, A SEVERE, SERVICE FAC.
Know when you see an R/S that the individual is in the grip of an evil
intention which he himself is generating. He intends that area or subject
on which he is R/Sing nothing but harm. Calculatingly, covertly, he will go
to great lengths to carry his intentions out, at all times carefully
concealing the fact.
The evil intention is not limited to terminals. He's not R/Sing on a
terminal; he's R/Sing on the evil intention. The evil intention can
associate with many terminals.
The R/S dominates the individual; it is the person. He has been overwhelmed
by it. In that area he has no ability to reason; he has no freedom to
choose. The evil intention is substituted for livingness. It is his safe
solution to life, his service facsimile.
The service fac does not respond to ordinary auditing because in the
course of ordinary auditing it does not get inspected. It, by its nature,
forbids inspection. But when addressed at the right/wrong level the pc
gives it up easily because in that area he has no power of choice.
MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC
We have had, for many years, service fac processing with which to
handle these obsessions, and thus to handle the person who R/Ses.
But it is not just finding one service facsimile. You find many service
facs which then add up to the big one. At Saint Hill in the mid-60s this
was commonly associated with R/Ses.
It was what the pc had done with the service fac to make others wrong
which was important, not just finding it. Early on, the tech included
auditing them out with Dianetics. And you found many, many more than one on
each pc. We used to get complete character changes with this.
The full tech on this has been submerged over the past several years.
It is probably this omission of requiring several service facs to be run
and then auditing them out with Dianetics that has resulted in so many
R/Sers going on up undetected.
As of this writing the full tech has been exhumed and we have now New
Era Dianetics tech to help strip these packages down and take them apart at
their basics.
So we not only have a more thorough means of handling service facs than
ever before-we also have a more reliable route to the handling of an R/Ser.
BUT IT'S MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC.
You may audit off one, two or three apparent service facsimiles that
all answer up to the complete description of a service fac. And they will
run. But all are actually leaning on the central service fac that is in
restimulation in PT. As you take these lesser service facs off the central
one comes to view.
On the first ones you find, the most you can hope for is you found
something that blew the TA down and moved you closer to finding the main
service fac. So you take them.
If you've found a service fac the needle will be looser and the TA in
reasonable range. And it will run on the right/wrong, etc. brackets and the
pc will get off automaticities. When you've finally found several and
walked it all the way through to the service fac it's as if all the other
service facs you've been peeling off are like the bands of trees and sod
that lie up against the mountain peak. So you take the service facsimiles
and run them as you find them. You unburden the cliffs before you pull the
mountain out by the roots.
As you're running out the first service facs you're reversing the
dwindling spiral, you're restoring the individual's ability to handle his
environment because he's now seeing it, he's now beginning to confront it.
And by the time you've pulled the main one-the mountain-out by its
roots you've returned him to sanity. He is now able to inspect; he no
longer needs a "safe solution."
It is the most dangerous thing in the world to have a safe solution,
because that is the hole out of which sanity drains.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mf
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue III
Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses
URGENT-IMPORTANT
ROUTINE THREE SC-A
FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED
WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS
Ref: HCOB 22 Jul 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT
HCOB I Sep 63 SCIENTOLOGY THREE CLEARING,
CLEARING, CLEARING, ROUTINE THREE SC
HCOB 23 Aug 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 30 Nov 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
TAPE: 6308C28 SH SPEC 300 THE TA AND SERVICE FAC
TAPE: 6309C12 SH SPEC 305 SERVICE FACS
HCOB 26 Jun 78 11 New Era Dianetics Series 6
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 4
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 5 Sep 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 6 Sep 78 11 SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS
________
NOTE: Dianetic Clears may be run on service facs but only with any
Dianetics steps deleted, as they are not to be run on Dianetics.
________
We are into a new echelon of service facsimile running.
At Saint Hill in the mid-60s many, many service facs were found on each
pc and the earliest service fac running included the use of Dianetics.
This was later omitted from service fac procedure and service facs were
handled solely with Scientology tech by running off the automaticities on
the computation to cognition, F/N and VGIs in the pc.
Phenomenal gains and case changes were made on pcs with that tech alone-
all of them valid. That tech has been retained as a vital action to service
fac handling.
Now, with the advent of New Era Dianetics, service fac handling has
been restored to its full technology.
New Era Dianetics has opened the door to a more complete and finite
handling of a service fac, with precision and exactness, than we have had
heretofore. We no longer just find a service fac, audit off the
automaticities, key it out and forget it. We audit it out fully and
terminatedly, using New Era Dianetics to take it down to its basics and
erase those.
This in no way contradicts the fact that there were many pcs who, with
a service fac found and the automaticities taken off, were able to actually
then blow the service fac computation upon inspection.
What it does make possible is the actual erasure of a service fac and its
residuals on every pc, one for one. And not just one service facsimile per
pc, but many.
An auditor who has been trained on service fac running prior to this
bulletin will need the tech he already has plus an excellent command of New
Era Dianetics tech. If he has not done the New Era Dianetics Course it will
be required before attempting to run Routine 3SC-A. A Class IV auditor who
has already done the New Era Dianetics Course need only review it in order
to be able to handle all the steps of the new, full service fac procedure.
SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING REVISED BY STEPS
Before you can run flows on a service facsimile you must first find it.
You want the pc's service facsimile. You don't find a service facsimile by
listing for it on flows. You find the pc's service facsimile and run it on
the flows.
The sequence is: You list for the pc's service fac, find it, run the
automaticities off it; then you run the service fac itself on R3RA, engram
running by chains. It is run to basic and full Dianetic end phenomena.
You don't leave a service fac until you have taken it apart and blown
it at its very roots.
Then you list for another service fac, using a different listing
question, and handle it fully. And another, and another. A pc can have
many, many service facsimiles. You peel them off until you find the main
service fac at the core of the case. And you handle that one fully, as you
do the others, per the steps above.
Needless to say, you are going to see some remarkable results.
FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY STEPS:
0a. Put in the R (Reality) Factor with the pc, telling him briefly what
is going to be done in the session.
0b. Clear "computation" very thoroughly with the pc. Use the Tech
Dictionary, HCOB 23 Aug 66, SERVICE FACSIMILE, and any other reference
you feel the pc may need. Have him demo it until you are certain he
fully understands it.
0c. Clear the bracket commands (right/wrong, dominate, survival)first,
using "Birds fly" as a sample service facsimile. Clearing the bracket
commands is done at this point so you will be able to use these
questions immediately when the service fac is found without putting
stops on the pc's first rush of automaticities coming off.
0d. Then, clear the listing question.
STEPS OF THE PROCEDURE:
A. List and null for the pc's service fac, using the question:
"In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?"
You want a BD F/N item that is a computation (not a doingness,
beingness or havingness).
When you get it, indicate the item. Then indicate the F/N. Then,
despite the BD F/N, go on to the next step of the handling.
B. Run the service fac found in 1 on the brackets:
1. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make you right?
2. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make others wrong?
3. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you escape
domination?
4. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to dominate
others?
5. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?
6. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the survival
of others?
These are run as follows:
Give the pc the first question, "In this lifetime, how would (service
fac) make you right?" and let him run with it. He will have a rush of
answers, answers coming too fast to be said easily, at this stage. Don't
repeat the question unless the pc needs it. Just let him answer 1-1-1-1-1-1-
1 (he may give you as many as 50 answers) until he comes to a cognition or
runs out of answers or inadvertently answers Question 2.
Then switch to Question 2: "In this lifetime how would (service fac)
make others wrong?" Treat this the same way, i.e. let him answer 2-2-2-2-2-
2-2-2 until he cognites or runs out of answers or starts to answer Question
1. Then switch back to Question 1, same handling, back to Question 2, same
handling, as long as pc has answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N,
acknowledge, indicate the F/N and end off on 1 and 2.
Now give him Question 3: "In this lifetime how would (service fac) help
you escape domination?" and let it run by the same method as above. When
this seems cooled off, use Question 4: "In this lifetime, how would
(service fac) help you to dominate others?" Use Questions 3 and 4 as above,
as long as pc has answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N,
acknowledge, indicate the F/N and go on to the next bracket.
Using the same method as above, give him Question 5: "In this lifetime,
how would (service fac) aid your survival?" When he's run out on 5-5-5-5-5-
5, switch to Question 6: "In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder
the survival of others?" Use Questions 5 and 6 as above as long as pc has
answers coming easily. Let him get off all the automaticities and come to a
cognition and F/N. Acknowledge and indicate the F/N.
At this point it is safe to end off on running the brackets. The idea
is not to beat the process to death. The pc will have automaticities coming
off thick and fast early in the run. These must be gone and the pc bright,
F/Ning and VGIs when you end off. You are only trying to end the compulsive
character of the service facsimile found and get it off automatic and get
the pc to see it better at this stage, not to bleed the process of every
bit of TA action.
Running the service fac in the brackets will result in a major
cognition, which could occur at any point during this running. When it does
occur it is the EP of this step of the service fac handling. End off and go
onto the R3RA step.
NOTE: In running a Dianetic Clear on service facs, you would end off
running this service fac at this point, when the pc had reached a
good cognition, F/N and VGIs. Do NOT run the Dianetic actions of
service fac handling on a Dianetic Clear, as these pcs are not to
be run on Dianetics. When you have completed one service fac on
Steps A and B. you can then list for another service fac and repeat
the procedure.
(NOTE: If the service fac found on any pc did not run on the
brackets, it would need to be prepchecked. See sections "When
Running Off The Automaticity" and "When To Prepcheck" below.)
C. Run the service fac R3RA Quad, each flow to EP. It is not run
narrative and it is not preassessed; otherwise full New Era Dianetics
tech is used, per HCOB 26 June 78R II, New Era Dianetics Series 6,
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS.
The service fac phrase itself is used as the running item.
The commands for running a service fac on R3RA Quad Flows are:
FLOW 1: "Locate a time when you used (service fac)."
(Example: "Locate a time when you used all horses sleep in beds. ")
FLOW 2: "Locate an incident of your causing another to use (service
fac)."
FLOW 3: "Locate an incident of others causing others to use (service
fac)."
FLOW 0: "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to use (service
fac)."
Take each flow down its chain of incidents to the basic and full
Dianetic EP: F/N, postulate (postulate off = erasure), and VGIs.
That will be the end of all vestiges of that service fac.
D. List for another service fac on the pc, using the listing question:
"In this lifetime, what do you use to dominate others?"
When you have the service fac, repeat Steps B and C above.
E. Find another service fac on the pc with the listing question:
"In this lifetime, what do you use to aid your own survival?"
Handle the service fac per Steps B and C above.
F. Continue to find and handle service facs on the pc, using, in order,
the following listing questions:
1. "In this lifetime, what do you use to make yourself right?"
2. "In this lifetime, what do you use to escape domination?"
3. "In this lifetime, what do you use to hinder the survival of
others?"
Further listing questions which can be used are given on HCOB 30 Nov
66, ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES.
You will need to find and handle several service facsimiles on the pc
which will then add up to the big one.
WHEN LISTING FOR THE SERVICE FACSIMILE
You are listing for a BD F/N item. Write down each computation the pc
gives you exactly as he states it, VERBATIM, with its read, no matter how
improbable, non sequitur or inane it may sound.
The service fac operates like a magnet as you're listing. You've given the
pc the question and as the question is in the vicinity of the service fac
you've already ticked it. It draws the pc's attention to it. He's listing
along and suddenly he'll put a non sequitur item on the list. It doesn't
make sense. It doesn't even answer the question, but there it is. Because
his attention is being pulled to this inevitably. You're asking him for
answers and he gives you the rightest answer he knows-"People always jump
off the Empire State Building." That's the solution. That solves
everything. It blows the TA down. That's the service fac.
Indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N.
You're now ready to run it in the brackets.
WHEN RUNNING OFF THE AUTOMATICITY
If you've found a service fac the pc won't be able to stay out of it, I
guarantee you.
The first question is always how would it make him right. (Never how
would it make him wrong. Never, never, never.) The automaticities should
start with the first question. If not, ask him how it would make others
wrong. You almost always enter it at the level of right/wrong. But don't
make the blunder of thinking it can't be a service fac if it doesn't enter
at that level. Try it on the other levels. It can enter at the level of
dominate; it might enter at the level of survival.
But if-on one of those-the pc doesn't immediately jump in and swim into
the whirlpool, it's not it. If he tells you, "Well, let's see . . . make me
right, no, hmmmm...." or "... escape domination ... no, doesn't make
sense," that's not it.
If he says that isn't it, then that isn't it. Don't hang him with a
wrong service fac because it's too easy to find a right one. They abound.
If he hasn't jumped in and swum madly to the center of the whirlpool
and gotten embroiled in this thing, it's not it. Because that's the first
thing they want to do with a service fac-drown.
When you have the right one you'll get the automaticities coming off
thick and fast. Don't stop the avalanche with acknowledgements. Don't stop
it with a new question. Let it run out.
It's not one auditing question for one answer. It's one auditing
question for one waterfall.
WHEN TO PREPCHECK
When the item found as a service fac won't run on any of the brackets
you prepcheck it to EP (F/N, cog, VGIs). Ref: HCOB 14 March 71R, F/N
EVERYTHING.
A rightness/wrongness computation doesn't surrender to normal auditing
because it is a service fac. The pc has a vested interest in holding onto
it. He won't be able to itsa it on a Prepcheck. Thus, a service fac, if
present, will turn on mass on a Prepcheck.
The Prepcheck is a series of types of decisions thetans make about
things. So if it doesn't prepcheck the Prepcheck must be in conflict with
the rightness and wrongness.
Reversely, if it's not a service fac it will prepcheck, and you polish
it off by that method to EP.
Then go back to the list and find a service fac that will run.
COMPLETING SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING WITH R3RA
Even when the pc has gotten off the automaticities, has cognited and is
comparatively free of the compulsive character of the service facsimile,
there is more to be handled.
Running the service fac using R3RA enables him to run out what he has
done with it to make others wrong, etc. These will be the actual most
charged incidents in which he's used it, which will have accumulated in his
wake as he went along substituting the service fac for himself and never
inspecting the consequences. He will now be free to inspect those parts of
the track as himself, and to inspect as well the effects of the service fac
on the other flows.
Finally, the use of R3RA, engram running by chains, enables him to
fully erase the somatics and engram chains which have their roots in the
service fac, or vice versa -as well as the postulates underlying them.
ENDING SERVICE FAC RUNNING
Service fac running can be ended off when you have fully run many
service facs (which will lead to the main service fac). When the main
service fac has been run to full EP, service fac handling is complete.
NOTE: It might happen (rarely) that you get the main service fac on the
pc on your first listing and nulling. It will be rare because the main one
does not usually come to view until the others have been taken off. You run
it, of course. Any service fac, run, produces change, but on this one you
will see the pc changing character before your eyes. The results are quite
astounding.
But realize that he does have other, lesser service facs which do not
simply dissolve because the main core service fac is now gone, even though
they have been leaning upon it. You will need to L&N for these and
completely clean the pc of service facs.
The main core service facsimile will be the one the pc has used as a
solution to all of life. When found and run it will be unmistakable to both
the pc and the auditor. When this one has been completed on all the steps
above, as well as the lesser service facs surrounding it, you will have
attained the EP on service fac running.
You will have brought about a complete character change in the
individual, returned his freedom of choice and his freedom to inspect and
enabled him to be truly right.
And that is the stuff of which sanity is made.
This level is actually the sanity level.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1978R
REVISED 21 OCTOBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
(This HCOB cancels HCOB 8 April 70 Iss II, MORE ON PREPCHECKS
and BTB 10 April 72RA PREPCHECKS. The correct procedure for
handling an ARC break uncovered during a Prepcheck is
contained herein.)
MODERN REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING
Prepchecking in varying forms has been with us since the early sixties
and has quite a long history which is available in the Saint Hill Special
Briefing Course tapes and the Tech Volumes.
The latest form of Prepchecking, Repetitive Prepchecking, has been used
by many with very good results for quite some time. It is a simple and very
workable process which can be widely used.
Since there has been no comprehensive bulletin on Modern Repetitive
Prepchecking, I thought I would describe and clarify it for you.
_________
There are 20 Prepcheck buttons, which are used in the following order:
SUPPRESSED
EVALUATED
IN VALIDATED
CAREFUL OF
DIDN'T REVEAL
NOT-ISED
SUGGESTED
MISTAKE BEEN MADE
PROTESTED
ANXIOUS ABOUT
DECIDED
WITHDRAWN FROM
REACHED
IGNORED
STATED
HELPED
ALTERED
REVEALED
ASSERTED
AGREED WITH
Virtually any charged subject or area can be prepchecked. The buttons
are used to take charge off the subject.
A question is formed around each of the buttons, and each question is
run repetitively to F/N, cog, VGIs. The button is prefaced with the subject
("On going to school," "On auditing," etc.) or with a time limiter ("Since
last August," "Since your last session," etc.). Both subject and time
limiter can be used. Thorough use of the Prepcheck buttons will blow the
charge from that item.
The only time Prepchecking cannot be done is while running Dianetics. To do
so mushes up engrams.
The question has to be tailored to the button. So we have:
"(Subject or time limiter) has anything been (button)?" or
"(Subject or time limiter) is there anything you have (been) (button)?" or
"(Subject or time limiter) is there anything you (button)?"
In the case of the button Mistake Been Made, the command would be:
"(Subject or time limiter) has a (button)?"
THE PROCEDURE
0. If this is the pays first Prepcheck, or if it has not been
previously cleared, fully clear the definitions of each of the Prepcheck
buttons with the pc, clear the Prepcheck questions, and go over the
procedure with him so that he understands how it will be run.
1. Clear the subject or time limiter you will be using.
2. Let the pc know you will be checking the first question on the
meter.
"On has anything been suppressed?" (or appropriate variation, depending
on the use of the time limiter or subject.)
If the question does not read instantly, leave it and go on to the next
Prepcheck question. You do not run unreading questions, so there's no sense
in sitting there, waiting for the pc to rummage around for an answer when
the meter shows there is no charge on the question in the first place.
If the question reads, go right into it and run it repetitively to F/N,
cog, VGIs.
3. Check the next Prepcheck button. "On has anything been evaluated?"
If reading, take to F/N, cog, VGIs per the above procedure.
4. Handle each Prepcheck button until you have reached the EP of a big
win, major cog on the subject or regained ability, accompanied by an F/N
and VGIs.
In some cases you may have to prepcheck all the buttons before the EP
is reached, but be alert. Recognize the EP. Don't overrun.
There is no need, when the pc runs out of answers, to recheck the
question. The question has already read, so you just run it repetitively to
F/N, cog, VGIs. If the pc insists he's out of answers, it may be that an
out rudiment or some situation requiring TR 4 or other handling has cropped
up. Find out what's going on and handle. Do not just abandon the Prepcheck
button because it does not now read. Take it to its EP!
When a Prepcheck uncovers an ARC break, you handle the ARC break with
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. The ARC break thus handled, that is the EP for that
Prepcheck button. You then go on to the next button and check it.
Prepchecks are a very effective method for releasing charge and provide
much relief. And they're very simple to do, especially in their most modern
form. So just study up, drill it well, and do it with your pc. You'll have
fine results.
LRH:mf.kjm L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Level 0-IV
Chkshts
Supervisors
Auditors MINI LIST OF GRADE O-IV PROCESSES
C/Ses
SPECIAL NOTE: The list below is by no means a complete list
of Grade 0-IV processes. Many, many processes exist on the
Grades 0-IV on which a preclear may need to be audited to
achieve the full end phenomena (ability gained) for a grade,
and which would also be required for a pc run on Expanded
Grades.
The following is a MINI LIST of Grade 0-IV processes.
At the completion of each of the training levels, the student audits
the processes on this list for that level.
Commands for Flows 1, 2, 3 and 0 (Quads) for those processes that are
run Quad are to be found on BTBs 15 November 1976, Issues I through VI, "0-
IV Expanded Grade Processes - Quads," Parts A, B. C, D, E and F.
1. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE PROCESS
HCOB 27 Sep 68 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE BTB 15 Nov 76
0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part A, ARC Straightwire, Item 11
2. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE HAVINGNESS
BTB 15 Nov 76 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part A, ARC Straightwire, Item 12
3. O-O, O-A, O-B
HCOB 11 Dec 64 SCIENTOLOGY O PROCESSES
HCOB 26 Dec 64 ROUTINE 0-A EXPANDED
BTB 15 Nov 76 II 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part B. Grade 0 Processes, Pg 10
4. GRADE ZERO HAVINGNESS
BTB 15 Nov 76 II 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part B. Grade 0 Processes, Pg 12
5. CCHs
HCOB 1 Dec 65 CCHs
6. LEVEL ONE PROBLEMS PROCESS
HCOB 19 Nov 65 PROBLEMS PROCESS
BTB 15 Nov 76 III 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part C, Grade I Processes, Pg 18
7. HAVINGNESS PROCESS FOR GRADE I
BTB 15 Nov 76 III 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part C, Grade I Processes, Pg 18
8. O/W PROCESS
BTB 15 Nov 76 IV 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS Part D,
Grade II Processes, Item 26
9. HAVINGNESS PROCESS FOR GRADE II
BTB 15 Nov 76 IV 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS Part D,
Grade II Processes, Item 27
10. CONFESSIONAL PROCESSING
BTB 22 Sep 78 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE
11. TWO-WAY COMM
HCOB 21 Apr 70 2-WAY COMM C/Ses
HCOB 3 Jul 70 C/Sing 2-WAY COMM
HCOB 17 Mar 74 TWC CHECKSHEET, TWC, USING WRONG
QUESTIONS
12. L1C
HCOB 19 Mar 71 L1C
13. L4BRA
HCOB 15 Dec 68RA L4BRA
14. R3H
HCOB 6 Aug 68 R3H
HCOB 1 Aug 68 THE LAWS OF LISTING & NULLING
BTB 15 Nov 76 V 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Part E, Grade III Processes, Pgs 7-8
15. GRADE III HAVINGNESS
BTB 15 Nov 76 V 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS Part E,
Grade III Processes, Pgs 8-9
16. SERVICE FACSIMILE PROCESS
HCOB 6 Sep 78 II URGENT - IMPORTANT, ROUTINE THREE SC-A,
FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA
DIANETICS
17. GRADE IV HAVINGNESS PROCESS
BTB 15 Nov 76R 0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES-QUADS
Issue VI Part F. Grade IV Processes, Pg 5
The student auditor must study and drill any of the above processes or
actions and their commands before he audits them.
He must not and cannot be required to audit any process above the level
to which he has been trained.
LRH:ldv L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
NED HIGH CRIME
Persons who try to run NED who haven't been certificate trained on NED
are. actionable regardless of their Class.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
BPI
URGENT- IMPORTANT
DIANETICS FORBIDDEN
ON CLEARS AND OTS
New Era Dianetics or any Dianetics is NOT to be run on Clears or above
or on Dianetic Clears.
This applies even when they say they can see some pictures.
Anyone who has purchased NED auditing who is Clear or above must be
routed to an AO or Flag to receive the special NED Rundown for OTs. They
are NOT to be run on regular New Era Dianetics.
Anyone who is Clear but not OT III is to get through OT III immediately
so he can receive this special rundown.
The EP of this rundown is: CAUSE OVER LIFE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
Tech Staff
Qual Staff OVERRUN BY DEMANDING
All Auditors. C/Ses. EARLIER THAN THERE IS
Supervisors
When you go past the postulate or insist on an earlier similar when
there isn't one the pc can go later or jump chains and put into action
other phenomena. This, and bad assessment is when you get tangled cases and
repair.
OVERRUN OF BASIC
When you get a blowdown and the pc tells you the postulate and then you
tell him to return to the beginning of the incident again, you can overrun
the incident and turn the analytical concept of it back into a solid
picture which will just get more and more solid and you'll think there was
nothing erased.
What you're erasing, actually, is the basic postulate that made the
chain occur in the first place.
OVERRUN OF NON-BASIC
In engram running by chains, when you demand a pc go through the
incident more than twice, and it is not basic that incident will grow more
solid. A good Dianetic auditor watches his TA and the moment that TA starts
to rise while running an incident on the chain he knows there is an earlier
similar incident. It is told to him by the TA, which is saying this
incident is getting more solid.
When he sees this, he immediately asks for an earlier incident after
either Step 9 or Step C of R3RA.
When you ask for earlier beginnings and then run the incident again and
keep doing this you can run a non-basic through several times and it will
inevitably become more solid. The degree that this can exert pressure on a
pc is very great and is extremely uncomfortable.
A really smooth Dianetic auditor never increases the solidity of the
bank. It is a non-determined point whether an earlier beginning alone will,
if found, decrease the solidity of a non-basic.
AMOUNT OF TA
A Scientology auditor works for amount of TA out of a process.
A Dianetic auditor works for the eradication of a chain. The Dianetic
auditor could get lots of TA if he overran every non-basic engram, but it
is this that he does not want.
The Dianetic auditor is not concerned with the amount of TA that he
gets. A TA has to go up before it goes down. In running an engram chain if
you let a non-basic engram raise the TA more than a thousandth of an inch
at Step 9 or Step C and do not immediately ask for an earlier incident, you
goofed as you will make the pc's bank more solid.
Scientology audits by the amount of TA. The most expert Dianetic
auditor audits with a minimum of TA.
ASSESSMENTS
A lousy job of assessment, trying to run unreading items, will find the
pc going into chains that are not ready to be run and will cause trouble,
which consists of many unwanted phenomena such as pc unable to find
incidents, jumping chains, etc.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Tech Staff
Qual Staff
New Era Dianetics URGENT - IMPORTANT
Courses
All Auditors,
C/Ses.
R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS AND
NARRATIVE R3RA - AN ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCE
Since the release of New Era Dianetics I have been keeping a close eye
on the running of NED on an extensive basis. Pcs have been experiencing
tremendous and quite amazing gains and resolving areas of their cases which
have never before been handled so fully.
This new and more precise Dianetics tech can and is changing the lives
of many across the planet.
When this tech was researched and developed I wanted to get it into
your hands immediately. Now that it is in broad use, there is a wealth of
data coming in on its application and the use of the new commands and
handling of EPs. From this, I have located a point where NED, as originally
issued, could go wrong on some pcs where earlier Dianetics did not.
As it has always been my practice to provide you with the most
accurate, proven and workable tech as it is developed, and as NED is a more
powerful tech than any earlier Dianetics, it is important that you have
this data.
The point referred to above is on the auditor asking for earlier
beginning or earlier incident.
The basic stable datum is and always has been: TA up even slightly at
the end of pc's run through the incident = something earlier. The
"something earlier" could be an earlier incident or an earlier beginning to
the incident being run.
There is a slight difference between the way these two are handled in
R3RA Engram Running By Chains and R3RA Narrative running, because of what
the auditor is trying to accomplish with each. The difference is in the
order of importance of earlier beginning and earlier incident.
R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
In R3RA Engram Running By Chains you are following down and erasing a
somatic chain. Here, in almost all cases, an earlier incident on the chain
takes precedence over an earlier beginning to the incident being run.
Therefore, if the TA is even slightly up at the end of the pc's run
through an incident on the chain, the auditor asks first for an earlier
incident and if there is none (or none the pc can yet see) he asks for an
earlier beginning to the incident being run.
Where you find an earlier beginning to an incident on the chain that is
not the basic incident you rerun that incident only once more through from
the earlier beginning to the end of the incident. If TA does not come down
on that run through, there's an earlier incident.
The whole point being made here is that on engram running by chains you
always want the earlier incident as soon as that is available. Thus, you
ask for the earlier incident first, then, if necessary, for an earlier
beginning.
R3RA NARRATIVE RUNNING
In R3RA Narrative running you are handling one single narrative
incident, such as an accident, a physically or emotionally painful
experience, an illness, loss, or period of great emotional stress, which is
not, ordinarily, part of a chain.
You are running that one incident many, many times through to erasure.
The clue to erasure of a narrative incident lies in locating earlier
beginnings to the incident. It will be found that the pc finds earlier and
earlier moments when he was told or had an awareness that the incident was
going to occur.
Thus, in running R3RA Narrative, it is the earlier beginning that takes
precedence, and that is what the auditor asks for after each run through a
narrative incident. Only if the incident starts to grind (no change of
content, etc.), after having repeatedly searched for an earlier beginning,
would you ask for an earlier similar narrative incident.
This data on earlier beginning is a new breakthrough on narrative
incident running and erasure, and the NED auditor should fully understand
it and the tech on which this additional difference between the two
procedures is based.
As pointed out in other issues, erasure of the somatic chain or the
narrative incident occurs when the postulate is obtained, and it is vital
that the auditor not go beyond that.
New Era Dianetics Series 6 and 7 have been revised to incorporate this
difference in earlier incident and earlier beginning handlings.
I wanted you to have the full and exact data on why these commands are
being slightly revised.
This should make for even smoother running of New Era Dianetics all
around.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
Limited Distribution
HCOs
LRH Comms CLEARS, OTS AND R/SES
Qual Staff
C/Ses
(Ref: HCOB 12 Sep 78, URGENT! IMPORTANT!
DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs.)
If there are any Clears or OTs who are R/Sing they are not R/Sers. It
is an entirely different handling, and this handling is incorporated in the
New Era Dianetic Rundown for OTs.
If a pre-OT staff member is R/Sing and dramatizing the R/Ses and has
therefore been put on an RPF, he is required to receive full handling per
the Special NED Rundown for OTs before graduating that RPF. If he is Clear
but not yet OT III, he is to get up to and through OT III as fast as
possible so he can receive this special rundown.
The New Era Dianetic Rundown for OTs can only be delivered at AOs and
at Flag.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
An old poem which has been newly adapted as policy:
There is so much bad in the best of us
And so much good in the worst of us
That it ill behooves any of us
To talk about the rest of us.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cb.nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978
HCOs in AOs
and Flag
GO in AOs
Tech/Qual CONFIDENTIALITY
in AOs OF UPPER LEVEL RUNDOWNS
and Flag
In order to safeguard the materials of confidential rundowns and levels
and to prevent their unauthorized use or misuse, the following is to be
done:
1. Before being given access to confidential materials such as "NED for
OTs," any student, auditor, Case Supervisor, Course Supervisor, etc.,
must sign a bond not to disclose the materials or to communicate them
to any unauthorized person, nor to use them in an unauthorized manner,
nor to use them without being properly trained by checksheet and
qualified. "NED for OTs" materials may only be studied by contracted
staff members properly enrolled on course.
2. Folders of pre-OTs being audited on "NED for OTs" must be colour
flashed with red diagonal slash across corner of folder, and the folder
marked as confidential, with the level on folder, and such folders must
be kept secure.
3. The HGC auditors and C/S must be trained at Flag before the AOs can
deliver "NED for OTs."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dm.kjm
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Cancels HCOB 7 July 1978 DIANETIC F/Ns.)
POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
The EP of a Dianetic chain is always always always the postulate coming
off. The postulate is what holds the chain in place. Release the postulate,
the chain blows. That's it.
You must recognize the postulate when the pc gives it, note the VGIs,
call the F/N and end off auditing on that chain.
Even if you get an F/N as the incident is erasing, you don't call it
until you've gotten the postulate.
1. When it appears that you have reached the basic incident of the chain
and that it is erasing, after each pass through the auditor asks, "Has
the incident erased?"
2. When the pc has stated that it has erased the auditor should also
expect a postulate to be volunteered by the pc.
3. If the pc says the incident has erased, but no postulate (made during
the time of the incident) has come off and been volunteered by the pc
the auditor should ask, "Did you make a postulate at the time of that
incident?"
(Note that the postulate will usually come off in the form of a
cognition. However the pc may give a cognition which does not contain a
postulate. If this is the case, simply ask, "Did you make a postulate
at the time of that incident?")
4. The pc does not have to state that the incident has erased. Once he
has given up the postulate, the chain has blown. You will have an F/N
and VGIs. This is a full Dianetic EP. NOW you call the F/N. Do not call
F/Ns until you have reached the EP.
You must learn to recognize a postulate when you hear one. It is a
vitally important skill as postulates can be confused with bouncers and
denyers when they are in no respect similar and require totally different
handlings.
"Women are no good" is an obvious postulate.
"That's the way men are" is a postulate.
"I can't stay here" is a bouncer.
"I can't remember this" is a denyer.
To push a pc earlier after he has given the postulate is a severe
invalidation of the erasure and you will soon have the pc believing that
nothing erases, anyway.
To cause a pc to search for further, earlier incidents on a chain
(which is no longer there) will get him into some very serious overrun. He
may pull in another flow of the item, he may think the erased incident is
still there and try to mock it up, or he may find another incident of an
entirely different chain and start to run that.
Dianetic overruns are repaired by assessing and handling the L3RF. But the
real cure is to flawlessly handle Dianetic EPs by getting the postulate,
F/N and VGIs and then promptly ending off on that chain with a bright and
happy pc.
Recognizing the postulate when it comes off and never never running a
pc beyond it are vitally important to the success of New Era Dianetics
sessions.
It's the POSTULATE we are going for in New Era Dianetics.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
L. Ron Hubbard
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE
LRH ED 298 INT 19 September 1978
BPI
A.D. 28
THE YEAR OF TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGHS
This year has so far resulted in technical breakthroughs from one end
of the Grade Chart to the other.
Each of these is the result of years of research and in recent months
one major discovery has led to another with great rapidity and astounding
success. On a research line one sometimes hits pay dirt, this time I struck
pure gold, not once, but several times and we now have new major grades and
rundowns at both ends of the Bridge.
New Era Dianetics has already been released and is internationally
reported to be working fabulously well producing 80% more gain.
An attempt to run NED on an OT resulted in a phenomenon which caught my
attention, and on further investigation brought to light the fact that you
cannot run NED, or any Dianetics for that matter, on a Clear (Dianetic or
Scientology Clear) or above. Research into this paid off handsomely with a
fantastic breakthrough for Clears and OTs. I have now developed an entirely
new rundown called "NED for OTs." This deals with living lightning, the
very stuff of life itself. Run exactly correctly by the book it produces
remarkable results in the OT band, and has made it possible for me to now
release OT VIII. "NED for OTs" is a highly confidential rundown done by a
Class IV, OT III auditor, called an Advanced Courses Specialist (ACS), who
is specially trained on its rundown and techniques. It is now forbidden to
run NED on Clears or above. From Grade VI to OT III is the Non-Interference
Zone, during which nothing should be run. Persons in this zone should move
on up to OT III so that they may be audited on "NED for OTs." This rundown
will be delivered in AOs and Flag to OT IIIs and above. Clears and OTs who
have paid for NED will now receive "NED for OTs" which in the pilot
auditing produced results beyond their wildest dreams. While much of it is
confidential I can tell you that the first step of "NED for OTs" is
designed to raise perceptions, especially theta perception, and as for the
rest of the rundown . . . surprise, surprise, surprise!
OT VIII
Although OT VIII has been researched earlier, I knew there was
something that had to be handled before I could release OT VIII. "NED for
OTs" does just that, and now I am very pleased to announce the release of
OT VIII, which will be available at AOs and Flag to OTs who have completed
"NED for OTs." It is a Solo level which will fortify an OT already in
excellent shape from "NED for OTs."
END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS
These breakthroughs at the OT level suddenly brought to view the reason
why Drug Rundowns become endless when they do! And gave the way to resolve
this. Now the Drug Rundown will be a comparatively short action and many
many Scientologists will be able to make much faster progress up the
Bridge. If you have had
an "Endless Drug Rundown" you can now look forward to getting it completed
with ease and get on to your grades and OT Levels. In this druggie culture
in which we live, it is a very timely discovery because now we can undo the
mind-crippling effects of drugs (psychiatrists' gift to Mankind) with great
ease, and with complete rehabilitation of the individual in a few
intensives of auditing.
The "End of Endless Drug Rundowns" has been incorporated into NED and
will be available in all orgs by NED auditors as soon as they are trained
on it, which will be in about 2 weeks.
TRAINING-FAST COURSES
All these new techniques require auditors and C/Ses fully trained and
specialists in that level to audit and C/S them. It is forbidden for any
auditor or C/S to run any of these without being properly trained and
certified.
It is therefore just as well that I overhauled the training route
earlier this year, resulting in fast training. We might even say the "End
of Endless Training." Today, it takes 4 weeks or less to train a NED
auditor. The checksheet and course for training Class IV, OT III auditors,
Advanced Courses Specialists who will deliver "NED for OTs" is also a fast
but accurate training level. So we are able to train auditors and C/Ses
rapidly to deliver these fabulous rundowns, and thus make them available to
you very soon.
I have always said that as soon as I make technical discoveries I will
get them to you as fast as I can, and I am doing that now.
I appreciate your support and help which makes it possible for me to do
this research for you.
1978 is the Year of Technical Breakthroughs, there have been more this
year than in any other year so far.
I am delighted to be able to make these available to you.
Love,
RON
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue I
Remimeo
NED Checksheets
All Supervisors
All C/Ses
All Auditors
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RDs
The possibility of running a Drug RD flat on a pc is totally zilch and
the reason for this is that there have been innumerable cultures in the
several universes that were far more drug oriented than this one. And even
on a person that's not manifesting drugs and hasn't taken any this
lifetime, you can collide with these cultures and universes if you keep
pushing it.
You can always find more drugs on the track. What you're interested in
is this lifetime and this body. This doesn't mean you don't run track on
the Drug RD, just don't push it. Don't ask for whole track drugs. When you
list out the drugs a pc has taken, you only want the ones he has taken this
lifetime.
The steps of the Drug RD have been rearranged to prevent this endless
running and allow the rundown to be taken to a flat point of freedom from
the harmful effects of this lifetime drugs and an F/Ning drug list.
Objectives are run on the pc. Each drug is run narrative followed by
preassessment then prior assessment and then some more Objectives to put
the pc back to PT after the engram running. The full and complete steps are
listed in C/S Series 48RB, NED Series 9R and NED Series 2R.
Also, there is now a Drug RD Repair List which will handle bypassed
charge caused by endless Drug RDs.
A lot of cases will now be sorted out and the speed of moving up the
Bridge will be greatly increased.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mm.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
All Dn Auditors
All C/Ses
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS
DRUG RUNDOWN REPAIR LIST
This repair list is used on a pc who has been over-audited on drugs,
who has had an endless Drug Rundown, and/or has BPC on auditing on drugs.
Assess it Method 5 and handle in order of largest read.
1. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU WERE NO LONGER
AFFECTED BY DRUGS? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can find that point.)
2. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU WERE RELEASED
FROM THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can find that point.)
3. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU RUN ON AN UNCHARGED DRUG? _________
(Find which drug wasn't charged and indicate it shouldn't have been
run. May be more than one uncharged drug; handle each.)
4. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU RUN ON AN UNCHARGED INCIDENT OR ITEM?
_________
(Find which and indicate it shouldn't have been run. There may be
more than one; handle each.)
5. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU ASKED TO LIST WHOLE TRACK DRUGS?
_________
(Indicate that this may have restimulated drugs he was not affected
by in this lifetime.)
6. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU PREVENTED FROM GETTING GRADES OR OTHER
AUDITING? _________
(Indicate.)
7. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS AN INCIDENT OR CHAIN LEFT UNFLAT?
_________
(Indicate. Flatten the incident or chain R3RA.)
8. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS AN INCIDENT OR CHAIN OVERRUN? _________
(Indicate it. Spot the flat point.)
9. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS A CHARGED DRUG NOT RUN? _________
(Find which and handle per NED Drug RD steps.)
10. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU FELT THE DRUG
LIST WAS F/Ning? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can spot that point.)
11. WERE YOU NOT ALLOWED TO DECLARE YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN COMPLETE?
_________
(Indicate. Let pc say what he/she wishes on this.)
12. WERE YOU TOLD YOU WERE A DRUGGIE WHEN YOU WEREN'T? _________
(Indicate it, and that pc isn't a druggie.)
13. WERE YOU AUDITED ON DIANETICS OR NEW ERA DIANETICS AFTER DIANETIC
CLEAR? _________
(If so, indicate that Dianetic auditing should not have been
continued past Dianetic Clear.)
14. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(Indicate. Have pc tell you what he/she thinks this was. If no F/N,
turn it in to a Scientology C/S to handle.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
REISSUED 9 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
(Cancels HCOB 8 Apr 78, An F/N Is A Read)
(Reissued to delete an incorrect reference.)
AN INSTANT F/N IS A READ
Ref: HCOB 2 Nov 68R Case Supervisor Class VIII
The Basic Processes
HCOB 20 Feb 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena
An instant F/N is an F/N which occurs instantly at the end of the major
thought voiced by the auditor or at the end of the major thought voiced by
the pc (when he originates items or tells what the command means).
It will most usually be seen as a LFBD/F/N or a LF/F/N.
So what does this mean, "An instant F/N is a read?"
A read means there's charge there to handle. It means there is force
connected with that significance which is available to the pc to view and
run. It means that item is real to the pc.
An F/N means something has keyed-out.
Now a key-out is what we are looking for on many processes which are
run. It means "Stop. End of process, end of rud, end of action." So an
instant F/N does not always mean you should take up that item.
To sort this out, you will have to understand the basic mechanics of
key-out, keyin and erasure. It will then become clear why an F/N is a read
and when it is taken up. To confuse this could really mess up a pc.
For example, on ruds, Prepcheck questions, protest, overrun, rehabs, to
name a few, an instant F/N would not be taken up. The EP of charge keyed-
out has been attained.
But to ignore an instant F/N on Dianetic items and certain correction
lists etc., will leave the pc with bypassed charge and major areas of case
unhandled. The key is "Is a handling required on the item or is an F/N the
legitimate EP?"
You will also have to understand that we are talking about INSTANT
F/Ns. An F/N which continues to F/N through an assessment means "No
Charge."
An instant F/N on an item means charge has just keyed-out on that item,
and that it can key back in again. There are actions, as in Dianetics,
where a key-out is not what you are going for. You want the postulate off
the basic incident of the chain, which indicates you have an erasure.
In Dianetics an instant F/N takes precedence over all other reads. This
is because, the pc, having just keyed-out the charge on that item, will
find it most real. It will be the most runnable item. An instantly F/Ning
item is taken up first. LFBD, LF, F and sF follow in their usual order.
The use of this thing is mainly a C/S use. A C/S can look down a column of
two-way comm or look down an L and N list and spot what F/Ned. If the C/S
doesn't realize that this was the item he can then take erroneously some
LFBD item or F item out of the columns of two-way comm as the resulting
item for that subject.
The use of an F/N as a read is almost entirely relegated to the next
C/S except when used in Dianetics.
Example: A C/S is looking for the actual service facsimile in two-way
comm. (You usually L and N to find service facs but you may have an
instance where you found one in two-way comm.) The pc mentions several and
finally one F/Ns. The C/S knows at once it is the service fac.
Example: A two-way comm has operated as a list and the C/S is trying to
reconstruct it. Unless he knows that an F/N is a read he might overlook the
actual item on that list which is the one which occurred immediately before
the F/N. This is the item.
When used in the session itself the auditor has to know that an F/N is
a read in doing L and N. The item which F/Ned is of course the item.
In a Dianetic session it is not uncommon to find a brief F/N occurring
on a list or a preassessment. In Dianetics we are not interested in key-
outs. We are interested in chains and erasures. So the "hottest reading
item" on the list is the one that gave an F/N. Usually it will be a BD F/N.
If the Dianetic auditor does not know that an instant F/N is a read he is
likely to ignore the item that F/Ned.
In Dianetics, you will find that an F/N taken up again, will
immediately key-in but this is what the Dianetic auditor wants.
The Scientology auditor is usually handling other phenomena and if he
bypassed an F/N and kept on going the TA would go up and he would have
trouble.
So the use of this principle is a very touchy thing and has to be
understood.
Of course the first thing you have to know about is what an F/N looks
like.
This tech fully understood and applied will mean the difference between
a case beingfully handled and "just doing better." Understand it and use
it. You'll see the difference in your results.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc.mf
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class IV Issue II
Grad
Check sheets
Snr VI
(Cancels and replaces BTB 26 Nov 71, Issue III OUT OF VALENCE
- 220H and BTB 25 Mar 72R URGENT IMPORTANT LX3 HANDLING
REVISED AND REISSUED. This bulletin does not change in any
way the Class VIII data on LX Lists or Out of Valence
handling.)
LX LIST HANDLING
Ref: HCOB 26 Jun 78 RA II New Era Dianetics Series 6RA URGENT
IMPORTANT. ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM
RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 5 Nov 69R LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2)
HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX2
HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX1 (CONDITIONS)
HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS
In handling Out of Valence from the GF 40 or the Expanded GF 40RD the
LX Lists are used in this order: LX3, LX2, LX1 and if necessary, the last
step, 220H.
END PHENOMENA
The end phenomena of the LX Lists is a remarkable valence shift. The pc
will cognite on having been out of valence and will become himself. It is a
cognition on beingness, not doingness or havingness that indicates the EP
of the LX Lists. DO NOT OVERRUN A PC PAST THIS POINT.
PROCEDURE
Clear each word on the list before assessing it and note any instant
reads which appear while clearing the item. These are valid reads. (Ref:
HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS)
Assess the list Method 5 and take up the largest reading item. Run each
recall flow of that item, then check with the pc to see if he is interested
in running it R3RA. Handle each flow of the item to EP. After a complete
handling of the item handle the lesser reading items (if any) as above.
LX3 ATTITUDES
LX3 is the first list assessed. Run reading LX3 items 3 Way or Quad
Recalls and 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA. Use the following commands:
Recalls: F1: Recall a time you took the attitude of _______.
F2: Recall a time you caused another to take the attitude of
_______.
F3: Recall a time others caused others to take the attitude of
_______.
F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to take the attitude of
_______.
Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and
unconsciousness when you took the attitude of _______.
F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your
causing another to take the attitude of _______.
F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others
causing others to take the attitude of _______.
F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you
causing yourself to take the attitude of _______.
LX2 EMOTIONS
LX2 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA as above,
substituting the reading emotion for the attitude.
LX1 CONDITIONS
LX1 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA using the
following commands:
Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were _______.
F2: Recall a time you caused another to be _______.
F3: Recall a time others caused others to be _______.
F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be _______.
Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you
were _______.
F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your
causing another to be _______.
F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others
causing others to be _______.
F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you
causing yourself to be _______.
Note: On items "grief" and "loss" the command would be "Recall a time
you had (a) _______." and "Locate a time containing pain and
unconsciousness when you had (a) _______.", etc.
220H
220H is done after completing LX3, LX2 and LX1 if the pc has not
experienced a remarkable valence shift and had a valence cognition. If the
valence shift and cognition occur any time during the handling of the LX
Lists, that is the end phenomena for LX handling and all further actions
connected with LX Lists handling are ceased.
220H is run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA, using the following
commands:
Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were being someone else.
F2: Recall a time you caused another to be someone else.
F3: Recall a time others caused others to be someone else.
F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be someone else.
Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when you
were being someone else.
F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of your
causing another to be someone else.
F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of others
causing others to be someone else.
F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of you
causing yourself to be someone else.
Each recall flow is run to F/N, cognition and VGIs. Each engram flow
must go to F/N, postulate and VGIs. (This will be the erasure.) If you
encounter any trouble, use an L3RF.
Done correctly, LX Lists will bring about some very major changes in
your pc.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue III
NED Grad Crse
All C/Ses
New Era Dianetics Series 19
C/S Series 103
NED AUDITOR ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
When an auditor is not having good success with New Era Dianetics, this
NED Auditor Analysis Checklist is used to find his exact trouble areas and
misunderstoods and get them corrected.
New Era Dianetics is so powerful and exact that when correctly applied
it is successful on pcs, one for one. If an auditor is not getting good
results it is important to get the situation handled early on, for the sake
of his pcs, the auditor himself, and to protect this vital, workable tech
against invalidation through misuse.
A C/S should order an auditor to have a NED Auditor Analysis Checklist
when that auditor's pcs are not making good gains or when the Auditor's
Reports show indicators of misunderstoods or misapplications, or when the
auditor is goofing and does not correct with ordinary cramming.
HOW THE CHECKLIST IS DONE
The checklist has two parts. Part I consists of an assessment done on
the auditor by the Cramming Officer or another auditor. The assessment will
disclose general areas of weakness or uncertainty on the part of the
auditor (TRs, metering, etc.), which are then looked into extensively on
Part II.
Part II is divided into sections which correspond to those in Part I.
If a section has read on Part I, that section is taken up on Part II, where
the auditor must do exact drills, demos and checkouts which will show up
his ability or inability to handle that aspect of R3RA. The purpose of this
checklist is to help the auditor; it must be done without invalidating him
or making him wrong.
Each area taken up is fully explored, per the checklist, and is signed
off, point by point, by the Cramming Officer as it is covered. The Cramming
Officer decides how to best correct the auditor based on what he has found.
This can be a cram, retread, retrain, and/or handling in session or in
Ethics. (Cramming is of course not limited to the references given in each
section, and should cover fully, with Word Clearing, checkouts, demos, clay
demos and drills, whatever the auditor is weak on or misunderstands. )
When all corrective actions have been completed the auditor sees the
Cramming Officer, who ensures he's really got it. The auditor should be
very bright and eager by this point. He then goes to the Examiner and
attests to the NED Auditor Analysis Checklist.
The auditor may now resume auditing New Era Dianetics.
This checklist, promptly C/Sed for and promptly done can save entire
HGCs, not to mention needless stress and strain on individual pcs, auditors
and C/Ses. Use it to get to the bottom of auditors who are not winning as
they should.
PART I
AUDITOR'S NAME: DATE:____________________
CRAMMING OFFICER OR AUDITOR ASSESSING LIST: ____________________
R-Factor to auditor: I am going to assess a NED Auditor Analysis
Checklist so we can locate any weak points in your auditing of NED and get
them corrected. (If assessment is done by an auditor other than the
Cramming Officer, explain that the second part will be handled in
Cramming.)
Assess the list Method 5. Handle any reading section on Part I by
taking up the corresponding section in Part II. Vigorously check out each
item in the section you take up and cram the auditor appropriately based on
what is found. (This is not an auditing action, it is a cramming tool.)
A-1 IN SESSION, DO YOUR TRs GO OUT? ________
A-2 IN SESSION, DO YOU GET NERVOUS OR AFRAID? ________
A-3 IS IT HARD TO SIT STILL DURING A LONG SESSION? ________
A-4 DO YOUR PCs HAVE TROUBLE HEARING YOU? ________
(If any of the questions in Section A read, go to Section A of Part
II and fully handle per the instructions given.)
B-1 HAVE YOU BEEN UNSURE THAT ITEMS REALLY READ? ________
B-2 HAVE YOU INDICATED F/Ns WRONGLY? ________
B-3 IS THERE ANY AREA OF METERING YOU FEEL UNSURE OF? ________
B-4 CAN'T YOU READ A METER? ________
(If any of the questions in Section B read, go to Section B of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
C-1 IS IT HARD TO KEEP UP WITH THE PC? ________
C-2 DO YOU FORGET THE COMMANDS? ________
C-3 ARE YOU IN MYSTERY ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING DURING A SESSION?
________
C-4 IS THERE SOMETHING ABOUT R3RA YOU DON'T GET? ________
(If any of the questions in Section C read, go to Section C of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
D-1 ARE YOU CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT A POSTULATE IS? ________
D-2 DO YOU WORRY ABOUT EPs? ________
D-3 HAVE YOU WONDERED WHETHER YOU'VE GOTTEN EPs ON YOUR PCs?
________
(If any of the questions in Section D read, go to Section D of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
E-1 ARE YOU UNSURE ABOUT WHICH ITEMS TO RUN? ________
E-2 DO YOU KNOW WHICH ITEM THE PC SHOULD BE RUN ON BEFORE
ASSESSING? ________
E-3 IS THERE SOME CONFUSION ABOUT HOW TO PREASSESS? ________
E-4 IS THERE SOMETHING YOU DON'T GET ABOUT NARRATIVES? ________
(If any of the questions in Section E read, go to Section E of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
F-1 DO YOUR TRs GO OUT WHEN A CHAIN BOGS? ________
F-2 ARE YOU UNCERTAIN ABOUT YOUR ASSESSMENT TRs? ________
F-3 DO YOU DREAD DOING L3RFs? ________
(If any of the questions in Section F read, go to Section F of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
G-1 IS THERE SOME PART OF THE DRUG RUNDOWN YOU NEVER UNDERSTOOD?
________
G-2 IS THERE SOMETHING ABOUT THE DRUG HANDLING STEPS THAT DOESN'T MAKE
SENSE? ________
G-3 IS THERE SOMETHING ABOUT DRUG HANDLING YOU DISAGREE WITH?
________
(If any of the questions in Section G read, go to Section G of Part
II and fully cover each item in that section.)
H-1 IS THE MIND REAL? ________
H-2 DO YOU EVER WONDER IF THERE REALLY ARE SUCH THINGS AS ENGRAMS OR
MENTAL IMAGE PICTURES? ________
H-3 HAVE YOU NOT HAD WINS BEING AUDITED ON NED OR DIANETICS?
________
(If any of the questions in Section H read, go to Section H of Part
II and fully handle per the instructions given.)
I-1 IS THERE SOME TRICK YOU USE TO MAKE SURE THE SESSION COMES OUT OKAY?
________
I-2 IS THERE SOMETHING YOU DO IN SESSION YOU WOULDN'T WANT THE C/S TO
KNOW? ________
I-3 HAVE YOU TRIED TO MAKE A SESSION LOOK BETTER THAN IT REALLY WAS?
________
I-4 HAVE YOU EVER FALSIFIED A WORKSHEET? ________
I-5 HAVE YOU EVER AGREED NOT TO PUT SOMETHING DOWN ON A WORKSHEET?
________
I-6 HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING WITH A PC YOU DON'T WANT US TO FIND OUT?
________
I-7 ARE PCs MEAN OR UNCOOPERATIVE? ________
I-8 ARE YOU INVOLVED IN AN OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? ________
I-9 ARE YOU JUST FAKING THAT YOU CAN AUDIT? ________
(If any of the questions in Section I (Eye) read, go to Section I
(Eye) of Part II and fully handle per the instructions given.)
J-1 AS A STUDENT, HAVE YOU FAILED TO LOOK UP MISUNDERSTOODS?
________
J-2 ON COURSE, HAVE YOU LET THINGS GO BY WHICH YOU DIDN'T REALLY GET?
________
J-3 HAVE YOU FAKED THAT YOU GOT IT? ________
J-4 DO YOU HAVE DIFFICULTIES AS A STUDENT? ________
J-5 DON'T YOU LIKE TO STUDY? ________
J-6 HAVE YOU PRETENDED KNOWINGNESS YOU DON'T HAVE? ________
(If any of the questions in Section J read, go to Section J of Part
II and fully handle per the instructions given.)
K-1 DOES SOMEONE OBJECT TO YOUR BEING TRAINED? ________
K-2 HAS SOMEONE BEEN ENTURBULATING YOU? ________
K-3 ARE YOU PTS? ________
(If any of the questions in Section K read, go to Section K of Part
11 and fully handle per the instructions given.)
PART II
A. TRs
Check out and correct the auditor's TRs 0-IV. It may be his TRs have
never been flattened, in which case he should be sent to do a Hard TRs
Course.
The auditor's TRs may be going out due to misunderstoods and
uncertainties about the tech. Be sure to explore this possibility also.
B. METERING
1. Have the auditor set up a meter. (Note any uncertainties in handling
the meter.) ________
2. Show me how you would check to make sure your meter is operational.
________
3. Check: Does the auditor wear glasses? If so, do the rims obstruct his
seeing the meter while he is looking at the worksheets or the pc?
________
Are his glasses satisfactory? Does he have any difficulty with them
at all? Is the prescription correct? (i.e. can he see with them?) Don't
just ask. Check it out. ________
4. Tell me what a reading item is. ________
5. Demonstrate each of the reads and which you would take up
first. ________
6. Is there any area of metering you feel unsure of? ________
7. Check the auditor out on the following meter drills: ________
EM 12 ________ EM 23________ EM 26________
EM 13 ________ EM 24________
Handle any MUs then have him do meter drills, meter drills, meter
drills.
REFERENCES:
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II NED Series 6RA URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS
HCOB 13 Sep 78 I URGENT IMPORTANT, R3RA ENGRAM
RUNNING BY CHAINS AND NARRATIVE
R3RA, AN ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCE
HCOB 28 Apr 69R HIGH TA IN DIANETICS
HCOB 12 Sep 78 II OVERRUN BY DEMANDING EARLIER THAN
THERE IS
HCOB 18 Jun 78R NED Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24
METERING READING ITEMS
HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND
AN E-METER
THE BOOK INTRODUCING THE E-METER
THE BOOK OF E-METER DRILLS
E-METER ESSENTIALS
HCOB 29 Apr 69 ASSESSMENT AND INTEREST
C. R3RA THEORY AND PROCEDURE
1. Define lock, secondary, engram, basic. ________
2. Have the auditor demonstrate what each R3RA command does, showing in
detail how it affects the pc and the bank. ________
3. How would you know whether an incident was erasing or going more
solid? ________
4. Have the auditor "run out" an item on you, keeping full session
admin. ________
Auditor knows R3RA commands cold.
While the auditor is running out the item, mock up situations which
require the auditor handles the following:
a) pc bouncing from incident. ________
b) recognizing and handling the basic incident on the chain when
it is reached. (Does he ask "Has it erased?"). ________
c) TA rising after the first run through the incident.
________
d) pc gets no visio. ________
e) pc says there's nothing earlier. ________
f) incident has erased, but no postulate volunteered.
________
g) cognition volunteered, but no postulate. (Can he tell the
difference between a cog and a postulate?) ________
h) TA high, pc says, "It's erased." No VGIs. ________
i) incident blown by inspection. ________
(While doing this section, note all aspects of the auditor's handling;
his TRs, his session admin, meter position as well as procedure. )
If it's out admin, cram on handwriting until the auditor can write fast
and legibly without effort.
Outnesses on commands indicate out basics. Handle with TRs 101-104 (per
HCOB 17 Jul 69RB New Era Dianetics Command Training Drills) and/or cram
using the appropriate references:
HCOB 3 Oct 78 NED RULE
HCOB 27 Jan 74 DIANETICS R3R COMMANDS HAVE
BACKGROUND DATA
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II NED Series 6RA, URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 15 May 63 I THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS
HCOB 8 Jun 63R II THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS, HANDLING THE TIME TRACK
BOOK: DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH
BOOK: DIANETICS: THE ORIGINAL THESIS
HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
D. POSTULATE AND ERASURE
1. Demonstrate what holds a chain in place. ________
2. Demo erasure and how it is accomplished. ________
3. Define postulate. ________
4. Give some examples of postulates. ________
REFERENCES:
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II NED Series 6RA, URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE 3RA
ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
E. ASSESSMENT AND PREASSESSMENT
1. Have the auditor give several examples of narrative items, somatic
items, after the fact items and medical terms. ________
2. Mock up situation of the pc offering to the auditor medical terms,
after the fact items and conditions to run. Auditor to handle
correctly, without evaluation or invalidation. ________
3. Mock up a session. Start with an original item. Have the auditor do a
full preassessment and choose the correct running item. (Note all
aspects of his handling, as above.) Auditor's preassessment procedure
correct. ________
During the preassessment, mock up the following situations for the
auditor to handle: a) no reads on list. b) an instant F/N. c) a body
motion "read" on a preassessment item. d) prior and latent reads. e) pc
wants to run something that hasn't read. REFERENCES:
HCOB 17 Jul 69RB NEW ERA DIANETICS COMMAND TRAINING
DRILLS
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II NED Series 6RA URGENT IMPORTANT ROUTINE
3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78R NED Series 4R
ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 28 Jul 71RA NED Series 8R
DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
HCOB 13 Sep 78 R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS AND
NARRATIVE R3RA, AN ADDITIONAL
DIFFERENCE
HCOB 20 Jul 78 NED Series 18 AFTER THE FACT ITEMS
HCOB 23 May 69R AUDITING OUT SESSIONS NARRATIVE VERSUS
SOMATIC CHAINS
F. L3RF
1. Have the auditor give several examples of when an L3RF would be used.
________
2. Have the auditor assess an L3RF on a doll. (Check his assessment TRs,
meter position, etc.) ________
3. Choose several L3RF items and have the auditor handle them as he
would in a session. ________
4. Are there any L3RF items you don't feel certain about or don't
understand? ________
5. Check out the auditor on E-Meter Drill 24. ________
REFERENCES:
HCOB 22 Jul 78 ASSESSMENT TRs
HCOB 11 Apr 71RC IMPORTANT L3RF DN AND INT RD REPAIR LIST
(and references in the metering section).
G. DRUG HANDLING
1. Demo why you run out drugs narrative. ________
2. Demo why you preassess drugs. ________
3. Demo why you do a prior assessment to drugs. ________
4. Demonstrate why you don't list whole track drugs. ________
5. Demo what drugs do to a person and why they have to be handled.
________
6. Is there anything about drug handling that isn't clear? ________
REFERENCES:
HCOB 15 Jul 71RA III NED Series 9R DRUG HANDLING
HCOB 19 Sep 78 I THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS
HCOB 19 May 69RA DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES, PRIOR ASSESSING
HCOB 28 Jul 71RA NED Series 8R DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON
H. DOESN'T KNOW AUDITING WORKS
2WC the reading question with the auditor to establish whether he has
any personal reality on the mind and engrams and whether he has had any
wins from receiving Dianetic auditing himself. If he doesn't know from
personal experience that the mind is real, that engrams and mental
image pictures are real and that auditing gives personal gains, put him
on a program to finish his Drug RD, including Objectives. If that
doesn't handle, then do an Expanded Green Form 40RD.
I. OUT ETHICS AS AN AUDITOR
Program for an Ethics Repair List and the Personal Revival Rundown. He
will not win as an auditor until he is honest and straight.
J. STUDY DIFFICULTIES
Program for full handling by using a Student Confessional List, Student
Rehab List, Student Rescue Intensive or any other appropriate auditing
action. Also, handle study difficulties with any retreads or retrains
warranted (i.e. Student Hat, PRD, etc.).
K. PTS
Return to C/S to program for PTS handling.
This completed checklist plus the corrective actions taken are kept in
the auditor's pc folder.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
SUBJECT INDEX
1976-1978
A Advanced Course's) (cont.)
material insecurity affecting lower level
pc, C/S gets
it traced, 129
A=A=A, service fac and, 457, 461 material insecurity, cases
wrecked by, 129
aberration(s), NED for OTs and OT VIII, 482
has been of some use to the person at some time or never
issue one without C/S okay, 46
other, 456 Non-Interference Zone defined, 482
is non-survival, 313 out ruds and, 46
psychosis is the most severe aberration, 313 preventing
unauthorized use or misuse of upper level
rightness, wrongness and, 457 materials, 479
service facs and, 4S6 requisites for the Solo Course R6EW,
113
time is the single source of, 25 Solo auditing and R6EW,
112
understanding the total of, 60 what the troubles on Solo
courses are, 112
when the individual is no longer able to select his
words of the platens are not cleared as in clearing
own course of behavior, 458 commands, 444
Academy, theory room must be quiet, 284 Advanced Courses Specialist,
482
accident(s); see also catastrophe: injuries Advanced Org, NED RD for
OTs delivered at, 389, 478
accident prone, handling, 65 Advance Program(s),
handling its effects on a person's life, 354 definition,
116
handling of (on Original Assessment Sheet), 156 is what
is called a Return Program, 116
PTS and, 210 Quickie Grades pcs need a Progress
Program and
suppression and, 219 an, 117
aches, as a symptom of previous bad auditing, 169 there are no
Solo Advance Programs, 127
acknowledge(ment)(s); see also TR2; TR21/2 affinity, definition,
411, 425
acknowledge what the pc says and tell him to con- after the
fact items, 78, 100, 101, 428
tinue, 381 agreement, assists and handling any agreement
person
"all auditors acknowledge too little," 381 had in
or with the incident, 219
example of a proper acknowledgement, 381 alcohol,
example of Q and A in, 381 audited over alcohol (in
Dianetics), handling, 140
half acknowledgement (TR 2l/2), 160 B, vitamin burned
up by, 175
over-acknowledgement stops a pc from talking, 160 can't
leave alcohol alone, 175
robotically using "Good," "Thank you" as the only Class
VIII C/Ses that handle, 175
acks, 160 commands for three-way or quad engrams
on, 175
teaching the student acknowledgements (TR2), 159 commands
for three-way or quad recall on, 175
action(s), deception and, 175
basic Case Supervisor actions, 163 delusions and, 175
VIII actions are all valid, 121 dishonesty and, 175
incomplete actions, symptoms and handling of, 171 drug or
alcohol addiction as an ethics offense, 208
it's always the earlier actions that are out, 148 how it
produces its effect, 175
major actions; see major actions physical deterioration
and, 175
off line case actions, 128 religious fixations and, 175
quickie actions due to paying bonuses for "comple- symptoms
of alcohol use, 175
tions," 202 TRs and Objective Processing ease
the withdrawal
acutely ill pc, handling, 56 symptoms, 106
addict(s), addiction; see also drug case 24 hour rule, 106
drug or alcohol addiction as an ethics offense, 208
alcoholic is a psychotic, 304
getting addicts off drugs, 129 alcoholism, Dianetics and, 69
non-optimum personal existence and addiction, 216 Alice in
Wonderland, 159
psychotic, drug addict is a, 304 allergy, non-optimum personal
existence and, 216
additives by auditor, 100 All Flows Rundown, results of, 134
administration, administrative, admin, alb, definition, 63
auditor admin: see auditor admin alterations, commonest cause
of out-tech alterations,
below administrative Whys there is usually an ethics
274
situation, 207 alter-is of original materials, 275
getting in ethics and tech before you can get in ad- aluminum
cans, 196
min, 292 anaten,
HCOB on, 36 overts as a cause of, 435
Modern Management Technology Defined, 258 remedies to
handle, 433
out admin, study tech is the basic prevention of, 204 Angel
Dust, Sweat Out Program and, 106, 361
advance; see case gain angry, pc angry at auditor, reason for, 3
Advanced Course(s); see also Solo answer/ed)(s),
actions a Solo auditor may and may not do, 127 getting
the command answered (TR3), 160
attestation, when to permit it, 113 "total-apathy-won't
answer" session upset in Diane confidential and AO lists, 251
tics, handling as a list error, 192
confidentiality of upper level RDs, 479 antagonism,
cassette to send or play to antagonistic
doublc foldcr danger, 115 people, 276
VIII actions are all valid, 121 antibiotics, Temperature
Assist Version A and, 153
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
anti-perspirant(s), ARC break(s) (cont.)
hand cream and, 223 handling, 138
wet hands and, 270 words of L1C not cleared yet but pc
in an ARC break,
apathy, handling, 443
list errors and, 192 ARC break needle,
low TA and, 126 bad indicators and, 48
"total-apathy-won't answer" session upset in Diane- calling
"F/Ns" that were actually ARC break needles,
tics, handling as a list error, 192 260
appendectomy, unresolved pains and, 122 definition, 47
application, appb; see also practical detecting an, 47
auditing session is 50% technology and 50% appli- effect
of indicating one as an F/N, 261
cation, 2 F/N differentiated from 47, 48, 261
auditor is wholly responsible for the application of the
handling when one occurs, 47
technology, 2 indicators are used to tell a real
F/N, 261
guarantee of successful application by the student, 73 Q and A
to date and run a secondary in ruds because
making all our own trouble by failing to apply Scien-
of an, 47
tology, 5 ARC break of long duration,
NED misapplications, handling the auditor, 492 ARC
break needle and, 47
arbitraries, handling, 101
HCOB on, 33 handling pc audited over, 168
standard tech has no, 33 manifestation of, 101
ARC, definition, 446 sad effect and, 39
ARC break(s); see also rudiments ARC breaky pc, M/W/Hs and, 2
ARC break needle and, 47 ARC Straightwire,
"ARC breaky pc" and M/W/Hs, 2 Drug Rundown and, 226
ARCU CDEI is used, 38, 47 references, 471
ARCU CDEINR, use and assessment of, 447 unburdening
cases with, 234
assessment of, 446 arrogant personalib, 96
assists and ARC break handling, 218 art,
audited over an ARC break, handling, 181, 185
"authorities" and, 320
audited over an ARC break (in Dianetics), handling,
avant-garde schools and, 319
139 communication and, 319
auditing over an ARC break, effects of, 445 constructive
criticism and, 320
bypassed ARC breaks, handling, 261 criticism and, 320
command "In your last session did you have an
destructive attitudes about a work, 320
ARC break?", 171 divided opinion about a work, 320
command prefixed with "In auditing has there innovation
and, 319
been an/a ", 170 invalidative criticism and, 320
commands, 446 literalness and, 319
definition, 411, 425, 446 originality and, 319
Dianetic ARC break, LlC is not of great use in a,
photographs as art, 319
143 seeking the significance in what the artist
meant, 320
earlier ARC break on engrams was restimulated, two-way
communication and, 319
handling, 138 what is not art, 319
engrams and, 29 when something is truly art, 319
HCOB on, 2 works that are shocking or bizarre, 320
heavy session ARC breaks without explanation, hand-
arthritis,
ling, 173 arthritic hands and false TA, handling,
196, 271
high TA (above 3,0) and, 147 Dianetics and, 69
how we get ARC breaks, 28 as-is(es); see also blowing; erasure
if not cleared on itsa get the basic on the chain, 38 he
no longer has to inspect to solve, so he never as list errors and,
192 ises the mass, 457
M/W/H is sole source of, 2, 448 out of valence person
does not easily as-is his bank, 96
never audit an, 446 aspirin,
not tracing it down to basic when it doesn't blow, 37
actions of, 104
out lists vs ARC breaks, correct lists first, 146 asking
pc "Have you been taking any drugs or as
pc answers ARC breaks with PTPs, handling, 170
pirin?", 106
Prepcheck turns on and uncovers old ARC breaks, 39 auditing
over drugs or aspirin, effects of, 105
Prepcheck uncovers an ARC break, handling, 470 drugs,
tranquilizers and, 104
prime source of ARC break in engram running, 25 give pc
a week to "dry out," 106
procedure, 446 its effect on running engrams, 104
references, 449 assess(ing), assessment(s); see also
preassessment
rough, angry ARC breaky session is auditor's fault, 2 asking
the question as a question, not as a statement
Routine 3RA and, 67 of fact, 355
sad effect and ARC break of long duration, 39 ask pc
the question in a questioning tone of voice, 430
sad pc and, 101 "assess existing lists or add" and NED
auditor says
session ARC breaks, checking for, 47 no items,
handling, 102
suppressing the emotional charge by falsely calling
assessing tone of voice, 355
an F/N, 261 assessment TRs, 430
theory of, 446 auditor assessed by interest only, not by
read, hand there was an ARC break in the incident (in Dianetics),
ling, 76
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
assess(ing), assessment(s) (cont.) assist(s) (cont.)
calling items to pc as questions, not as statements,
persisting injury or operation despite a full assist,
345 reason for, 218
checking NED auditor's grasp of, 497 postulate two-way
comm and, 218
definition of assess, 426 preassessing the incident, 218
definition of assess in Dianetics, 63 prediction of
recovery, handling of, 219
definition of assessment, 426 present time, Havingness
brings pc to PT, 219
early Dianetic assessment methods, 396 prior confusion
handling, 219
instant differentiated from latent reads, 438 problem
handling, 218
is done by the auditor between pc's bank and the protest
in the incident, handling of, 219
meter, 355 references, 215
kinds of assessment used in NED, 350 release of affect,
56
longest fall or BD noted, 355 religion and, 220
look at meter while doing an, 355 results of, 150
lousy job of assessment in Dianetics, effects of, 475
run the incident itself Narrative R3RA Quad, 218
medical terms or symptoms are never assessed in
secondary, handling of, 218
Dianetics, 69 seriously physically ill, handling,
95
misassessment in Dianetics, 100, 108 severe injury,
handling, 188
misassessment in Dianetics, spotting it, 101 slow recovery
after an engram has been run, reason
narrative assessment commands, 354 for, 219
NED assessment and how to get the item, 350 Solo Assists,
127
Original Assessment; see Original Assessment steps to be
done, 217
procedure in Dianetics, 350, 355 stuck point or fixed
picture, handling, 219
references for Dianetics, 498 summary, 215
taking reads while pc is originating item, 355
suppressive presence handling, 219
TR Debug Assessment, 336 theory of what an assist is
doing, 217
what you are attempting to accomplish when doing three
types of, 150
an assessment (in NED), 350 Touch and Contact Assists
interrupting a general
assign fast auditors to fast pcs, 94 course of auditing,
handling, 128
assist(s), Touch Assists; see Touch Assists
agreement with the incident, handling of, 219
unconscious pc, handling, 151, 219
approach one uses in, 56 withhold handling, 218
ARC break handling, 218 X-ray and, 216
Auditing Assist; see Dianetic Assist attest (ation(s); see
also declare
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 91, 117, 150, 215 in
Solo, when to permit it, 113
coma, handling pc in a coma, 219 pc run on Grade Zero but
won't attest, handling, 119
Contact Assist; see Contact Assist Solo auditor who
"attests" rather than confront his
crueltv to neglect giving assists, 217 bank, 145
Dianetic Assist; see Dianetic Assist when pc doesn't
attest, handling, 120
Dianetic Assists HCOB, 55 attitude(s),
Dianetic Clears and, 91, 117, 150, 215 LX3 Attitudes,
handling, 489
Dianetics forbidden on Clears and OTs, 91 LX3 list, 107
drug "five days" rule does not need to apply, 218
audit(ed)(ing),
drugs, handling assists given over drugs, 218 actions;
see actions
end off if injury or illness clears up before all steps
actions which occur during, 29
are done, 220 admin in auditing, 36
EP of, 153 aspirin and other pain depressants, how they
affect
errors in tech rebound heavily on injured or ill people,
auditing, 105
220 assists in the midst of grade auditing, 218
F/N every assist, 150, 153 audited over drugs, medicine
or alcohol (in Dianetics),
first aid rules apply to injured persons, 151
handling, 140
Full Assist Checklist for Injury and Illness, 250 audited
over out ruds, handling, 168, 181, 185
grade auditing, whether to disrupt it with assists, 218
audited with prior grades out, handling, 185
Havingness, reason it is run, 219 auditing environment is
auditor's responsibility, 196
HCOB on, 153 auditing out sessions, 79, 156, 364
high or low TA handling, 219 auditing over drugs or
aspirin, effects of, 104
illness following auditing, handling, 219 auditing
skill remains only as good as student can do
Injurv Rundowm 153 his TRs, 157
is entirely in the field of the spirit, 217 auditor
ceasing to audit, handling, 205
is not engaging in healing or treatment, 217 audit the pc
in front of you, 17
is the traditional province of religion, 217 backlogs,
bringing them into view, 276
light, very exact in tech auditing is required on in-
bad auditing; see bad auditing
jured on ill people, 220 basic auditing; see basic
auditing
losses, handling of, 219 bit and piece auditing, 307
medical examination and, 216 bit and piece, major Why
of, 213
medical treatment and, 216 can't audit, handling, 83
ministers and, 217, 220 charge on previous processing,
handling, 156
mystery point handling, 219 coffee shop auditing defined,
128
overt act handling, 218 coffee shop type auditing can
rough a needle, 7
pc with severe injury or illness should be run on all
communication, what makes it work in processes, 439
three types, 150 complete an auditing cycle once
begun, 115
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
audit(ed)(ing) (cont.) audit(ed)(ing) (cont.)
confusions on meter, Model Session and processes things
which do not respond to routine auditing, 457
stemming from inability to do TRs, 157 valid
processing defined, 25
C/Sing or auditing without folder study, 202 what happens
if any later grade is run with more
definition, 409, 422 flows than were used in
earlier actions, 132
delivery; see delivery why PTS case does not respond to
processing, 50
does not respond to auditing, handling, 181 why the sick
and insane do not respond to processing,
doesn't want auditing; see doesn't want auditing 50
doing "whole org" auditing actions, 115 you can audit
just as well as I can with practice and
don't audit someone during a drug delusion state, 176
study, 15
enrolling on courses but not taking them in order to Auditing
Assist; see Dianetic Assist
get professional rates in auditing, 284 auditing comm
cycle, definition, 409, 423
errors; see errors auditing rcport(s); see also auditor
admin; Exam Re
estimate, 331 port; worksheets
failures; see failures Examiner Reports at variance with,
255
feared inability to audit, sign of, 213 false
auditing reports; see false auditing reports
flubs in TRs are the basis of all confusion in subse
penalty for failing to write clearly on worksheets, 221
quent efforts to audit, 157 R/Ses must always be
reported in the, 239
folder lost mustn't halt auditing, 115 R/Ses, noting and
recording of, 240
gives gains by deletion, 92 auditing room(s),
has not had auditing, handling, 181 checklist for
setting up sessions and an E-Meter, 322
hours; see hours dictionaries must be in the, 442
how do you know what good auditing is unless you're pc
is seated in the chair furthest from the door, 381
trained?, 285 pc too hot, handling, 272
how to make any pc sit up and get audited smoothly,
room readiness steps, 322
5 setting up the room and session, 381
ill after auditing but sessions look alright, handling,
auditor(s)('s),
102 acting on a case without an FES, 202
illegal pcs, acceptance of, 259 acting on a case without
an up-to-date Folder Sum
illness following auditing, handling, 219 mary,
202
ill pc, auditing a, 37 "all auditors acknowledge too
little," 381
inability to audit, what underlies it, 83 "all auditors
talk too much," 380
intcnsive; see intensive another auditor on the case
hidden, reason, 256
it takes as long as it takes, 344 another auditor unknown
to the C/S, handling, 129
late at night and high TA, 124, 197 272 asking pc
"Have you been taking any drugs or aspir
light, very exact in tech auditing is required on in-
in?", 106
jured or ill people, 220 asking pc what the
auditor did, 94, 100, 102, 144, 147
major actions; see major actions asking the D of P for an
unusual solution, 36
Major Processing Service defined, 316 assign fast
auditors to fast pcs, 94
materiel needed in a session, 322 auditing environment is
auditor's responsibility, 196
medication and, 37 auditor scarcity causing self-
auditing, 128
NED auditing is so simple it demonstrates cleanly being
doubtful of control in engram running, 381
whether person can audit or not, 108 biggest
failure in training auditors, 63
NED auditor who doesn't know auditing works, blows,
handling, 205
handling, 499 bonuses and, 202
never rush a pc or hold him up, 388 breaks and, 37
no auditing; see no auditing can find no item in
Dianetics, handling, 102
no sleep, auditing a pc on, 37 can't audit, handling, 83
not enough auditing on enough chains, 122 ceasing to
audit, reasons for, 283
not valid processing defined, 25 charge is the sole thing
being removed by the auditor
off-line case actions, 128 from the time track, 27
Paid Comps and, 316 checklist for setting up sessions
and an E-Meter, 322
pc can always be solved in or below where he is, 148
Class VIII auditor who thinks he can fly before he
pc cannot buv training or processing due to mol1ey
can even creep, 41
troubles, handling, 179 comm lags causing auditor
and auditing failures, 94
pc confused about the meaning of commands, hand-
conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA,
ling, 442 223
pc not audited for some time, handling, 166 correction
of, 251
problems pc is trying to solve with processing, hand-
cramming for every flub or bog, 144, 146, 342
ling, 156 C/S does not talk to the, 36
professional rates, 284 C/Sing or auditing without
folder study, 202
random auditing should not be done, 38 definition, 409,
422
refusal to audit, reason for, 213 delivering quickie
auditing for completion, 202
rough auditing reduces havingness, 23 Dianetic auditors;
see Dianetic auditors
running out previous auditing, 156 difference between
making auditors and not making
self-auditing; see self-auditing auditors, 44
Solo auditing; see Solo auditing "dog pc" and auditor
refusing to audit, 213
speed; see speed easing off on auditing, reasons for, 283
state of perfection, how to get auditing into a, 5 ending
off the session and sending it to the C/S, 36
Sweat Program and, 327 errors; see errors
Tech Estimator and, 331 establishing whether a person
will attempt to ruin or
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
auditor(s)('s) (cont.) auditor(s)('s) (cont.)
stop an, 8 timid tech staff who back off from handling
rough
Ex Dn auditor, full extent and skill of an, 279 pcs,
handling, 250
failures of Dianetic auditors, reason for, 63 tone of the
session is set by the auditor not the pc, 3
failures, reasons for, 94 TRs daily and, 263
falsifying a stat, 202 using freak control methods or processes
to "keep a
falsifying auditing reports, 254 pc in session," 2
feared inability to audit, sign of, 213 weekly or monthly Qual
check on TRI and ability
"feeling they cannot help the pc," 213 to make a question
read, 263
forbidden to run new techniques without being prop- when you
run into a snag you can't handle, 36
erly trained and certified, 483 why an VIII who is not a
proven Dianetic auditor is
has more control over pc's mental image pictures not
dependable as an, 109
than pc does, 61 why pc's pictures do what the auditor
says, 61
having trouble with an "ARC breaky pc," 2 you can audit just
as well as I can with practice and
honesty of auditor determines results, 200 study, 15
illegal pcs, penalty for acceptance of, 259 auditor admin; see also
auditing reports
inability to audit, what underlies it, 83 failure to make
obscure words plain in print is a no
inability to see when a cycle of action is complete, 42
report, 36
interneships for his class must be done to audit in
illegible writing is a no report, 36
HGC, 247 making a ring around the item found, 36
invalidations or accusations of, 273 not handling Green Form
reads as they occur, 36
is wholly responsible for the application of the tech- not
writing in F/Ns, 36
nology, 2 out admin, handling, 497
materiel needed in a session, 322 Auditor Correction List, use of, 251
misunderstoods causing them to stop producing or authorities,
blow, 205 art and, 320
most common goofs made by, 37 study and, 110
must be able to relate all the EP of a process to an automatic
bank, definition, 62
F/N in clay, 42 automaticib, automaticities,
NED auditing is so simple it demonstrates cleanly pictures,
automaticity of, handling, 434
whether person can audit or not, 108 running off the
automaticity in Routine 3SC-A, 467
negative criticism undermines auditors, 82 service facs and,
463, 465
no gain pc and, 2 avalanche, an, 434
no read auditors, handling, 146 awareness(es); see a/so perception
not certificate trained on NED but trying to run it chains
are held together by one similar awareness, 69
(High Crime), 473 list of 57 human perceptics, 431
not following C/S instructions, 37 pains, aches, dizziness,
sadness, are all awarenesses,
not getting out their hours, handling, 205 69
Objectives being quickied by auditors, handling, 333
restoration of awareness is often necessary before
offenses that result in two weeks loss of pay and a
healing can occur, 55
suspension of certs, 202 unaware and State of Case
Scale, 27
pc angry at auditor, reason for, 3 Axiom 28, 204
pc makes trouble for auditors, handling, 181
penalties for various offenses, 202
penalty for failing to write clearly on worksheets, 221
B
penalty for failure to clear each word of every com
mand or list used, 204
picking and choosing pcs, 213 backlogs, bringing auditing backlogs
into view, 276
poor auditor, handling of, 14 backtrack,
professional competence and pride, 273 being less willing to
reach and duplicate events of
professional rates, 284 the past, reason, 439
provisional and permanent certificates, 285 children who can't
go backtrack, 233
reason he must be able to handle the time track drug, alcohol
or medicine case seldom goes back smoothly, 26 track
well, 361
recovery of, 283, 289 , past life remedies, 232
recovery program, 205 reasons pcs won't go backtrack, 233
refusal to audit, reason for, 213 why druggie won't go
backtrack, 233
responsibility to ensure pc understands the commands bad, there is
so much bad in the best of us and so much
and procedure, 433 good in the worst of us, 478
rights, abuse of "auditor's rights," 213 bad auditing,
rights modified, 213 bad session last time, handling, 171
rough, angry ARC breaky session is auditor's fault, 2 handling
the student who makcs had auditing goofs,
scarcity of auditors, handling, 206 74
Scientology vs, Dianetic auditor, 58 mishandled pc (from
folder inspection), handling, 171
slow auditor, handling, 94 remedy of, 14
speed of commands and, 388 Routine 3RA and, 67
stats may only be hours audited, 214 symptoms of (in pc), 169
stops producing or doesn't produce, handling, 205 bad indicator(s),
strengthening auditor's determination to be profes- ARC
break needle and, 48
sionally competent, 273 "F/N" and, 47
suspension of certs, reasons for, 202 pc ends session with Bls,
handling, 166
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
bank; see reactive mind being(s) (cont.)
basic auditing, Tone Scale position, what determines it, 439
HCOB on, 31 well and happy being, making a, 350, 353
meter flinch and, 31 what happens as tone goes lower, 439
Routine 2-12 and, 14 betrag, definition, 210
basic basic, definition, 62 Better Business Bureau, 64
basic of chain, betterment; see case gain
allowing pc to get all the charge and postulates out
biochemistrg,
of basic, 344 reason very little advance has been
made in, 104
all picture chains are there because the first time and
what the least harmful pain depressant would be, 105
the postulate are there, 80 Bls; see bad indicators
auditor sent pc earlier than basic, handling, 76 black, black
field,
chains always end up in a basic engram, 70 all black,
handling, 167
chain will key-in again if you don't get the basic all
black (in Dianetics), handling, 139
engram, 70 definition of black field, 61
charge is held in place by the basic on a chain, 28
state of case and, 27
definition, 62 Black V Case, State of Case Scale and, 27
demanding pc go earlier than, 100 blank, drugs render thetan
blank, 105
demanding pc go through non-basic more than twice, blindness,
Dianetics and, 66
effects of, 474 blinking, handling, 158
engram chain is held in place by the basic and the blood, high
blood pressure and Sweat Program, 341
postulate, 80 blow(s), blown (departures),
erasure occurs when the postulate made during the auditor
blows, handling, 205
basic incident is gotten off, 59 blown student,
handling, 111, 250, 284
F/N can occur five or more engrams before basic
differentiating between a problem that concerns pc
is reached, 403 and an effort to blow session,
162
forced to go earlier below basic, how the C/S spots
lack of study tech causing blows, 284
it, 101 reasons for, 284
forcing the pc earlier than basic, 80 resistive case and,
181
getting the postulates in the basic incident, 343 students
who try to blow, handling, 111
high TA on basic, handling, 81 blow(ing(s)as-ising mass): see
also as-is; erasure
is the first time, 80 by inspection, 81, 388
jumped chains by being forced to go earlier below release
the postulate and the chain blows, 62, 480
basic, 101 blowdown,
more than one postulate in the basic incident, 344 instant
F/N and BD Dianetic items are the best, 130
non-basic, overrun of, 474 longest fall or BD noted in
Dianetic assessment, 355
not allowing pc to fully view basic, effect of, 344 Board
Technical Bulletin, no BTB may cancel an
overrun by demanding earlier than there is, 474
HCOB, 274
overrun, effects and handling of, 480 bodg, bodies,
overrun of non-basic, 474 alcohol and phvsical
deterioration, 175
postulate holds the chain in place, 62, 80 becoming
healthier and more in tune with the, 326
recognizing when you hear a postulate, 480 circulation:
see circulation
rule of first time, understanding the, 81 dead bodies
read between 2.0 and 3.0, 199
running later incidents vs, running basic, 28
definition, 408, 423
TA goes up on running a late engram and comes
Dianetics addresses the, 68
down on basic, 71 fat: see fat
unburdening down to first time, 80 flushing wastes out
of the, 325
went past basic on a chain, handling, 137 getting body
fat decreased on the Sweat Program, 325
what happens when only later than basic incidents hands;
see hands
are run, 28 LSD still in the body, handling, 324
what happens when the basic on the chain is found
overweight people and Sweat Program, 339
and erased, 28 poisons flushed out during the Sweat
Program, 324
why later than basic incidents are run, 28 Sweat Program
causing body changes, 324
basics, toxic substances lodged in the tissue and fat of the
getting auditing into a state of perfection and, 5
body, handling, 361
idea that the "old" is always cancelled by anything
underweight people and Sweat Program, 339
"new," 118 boil off, M/W/Hs and, 3
Routine 3RA basics, references to, 497 bond signed not to
disclose "NED for OTs" materials,
teaching of basic data restimulates confusions, 74
479
tendencv to retire basics, 119 B1; see Vitamin B,
Basic Study Manual, Student Hat vs ,, 283 bone(s),
BD; see blowdown assists and broken bones, 216
beefing up, the bank is, 10 breaks and assists, 150
behavior, bonus)es),
handling pre-OTs with high OT sections that do not may not
be paid for "completions," 202
change non-optimum behavior, 39 payment of, 202
improvement with Ex Dn, 242 bonus packages, Routine 2 and, 19
when the individual is no longer able to select his book(s),
own course of behavior, 458 Have You Lived Before
This Life?, 321
being(s): see also case: preclear: spirit: thetan Modern
Management Technology Defined, 258
having decent, honest or capable beings, 29 stuck in
incidents from, 234
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
book(s) (cont.) can(s), electrode(s) (cont.)
Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology, holdmg
cans so tight it caused pc's hands to sweat, 265
The, 237 keep the pc's hands in sight, 196
Volunteer Ministers Handbook, The, 243 leads: see leads
what books the C/S must know, 121 never let pc off cans, 39
bouncer(s), one-hand electrode: see one-hand electrode
command for returning pc to the incident in R3RA, part of
pc's hand (the palm cup) not touching the, 265
385, 392 R/S caused by cans touching something
like a dress,
definition, 343 238
drilling handling of, 88 rusty cans, handling, 269
examplc, 480 rusty corroded cans falsify TA, 197
handling in R3R, 343 should be steel with a thin tin
plating, 196
handling in R3RA, 384, 392 size of cans for a small
child, 196
postulates can be confused with, 480 sizes and alternate
sizes of, 270
returning pc to the incident, 343 sizes of cans to use,
196, 268, 270
brain, psychiatric brain operations and illegal pcs, 259 skin
oils on hands are needed to give electrical conbrain surgery, effects
of, 56 tact, 222
break(s), session break(s), too large or too small, handling,
270
cut out breaks, 39 very small cans or too small cans
and false TA, 196
process split by a break, handling, 180 warming up
the cans, 198
taking frequent breaks, 37 wrist straps, use of, 271
TA went up the moment session was resumed, hand- wrong
can size, handling, 196
ling, 180 wrong size cans causing slack grip, 196
breakthroughs in AD 28, 482 cancer and illegal pcs, 259
breath, having pc take a deep breath and let it out, 323 can squeeze,
Bridge, the: see Classification Gradation and Awareness
adjusting sensitivity by, 280, 323, 382, 440
Chart finding pc's Havingness Process, 440
bridge to society, study tech is our, 203 case(s): see also
preclear: thetan
bronchitis, arrogant personalities are out of valence, 96
auditing on, 92 "can't run engrams" is usually a drug
case, 155
example of how to handle, 352 "case failures" due to
lack of auditor speed, 94
what happens when only one chain is handled, 91 case
that has had all possible NED gain, handling, 82
bruises, assists and, 150 "cave in hard" case, handling, 49
BTB see Board Technical Bulletin C case in NED, 83
bullbait(ing), ceased to F/N, handling, 178
buttons and, 159 chronic case level and the State of Case
Scale, 27
may not use actual processes or implants, 129 "chronic
meter of a case," 28
TR 0 Bullbait, 158 contemptuous personalities are out
of valence, 96
burns, cracking most cases to a point where they run
well,
assists and, 150 procedure, 250
Dianetics and, 66 critical personalities are out of
valence, 96
button(s), "detached" lower grade case, handling, 39
bullbaiting and, 159 difficult case, handling, 249
Prepcheck buttons, order they are used in, 469 doesn't
exteriorize at a level it should, handling, 178
Prepcheck buttons, use of, 469 drug case: see drug case
using restimulative material to "push someone's easy to
run cases and State of Case Scale, 27
buttons,'' 129 Examiner is seen to make statements
regarding case,
bypassed charge, on improperly done past prepared 421
lists, handling, 252 false motivator case, 49
false overts case, 49
foreign language case, two dictionaries
needed for, 442
gain: see case gain
C going sour on Dianetics,
reason for, 344
handling pre-OTs with high OT sections
that do not
change non-optimum behavior, 39
calcium and magnesium supplements, 340 illegal pcs, acceptance
of, 259
calculus, 118 imaginary cause case, 49
calibration, E-Meter and, 77 institutional cases and jokers and
degraders, 291
Cal-Mag; see also magnesium it's the grade processes and OT
levels that improve
formula, 325, 340 cases, 38
substitute for, 340 jokers and degraders, 291
two times a day during Sweat Program, 326 LSD case; see
LSD case
can(s), electrode(s), misunderstood case condition, handling,
167
aluminum cans, 196 no auditing as the most basic
failure of, 277
are the leads connected to the meter and cans? 269 no case
gain: see case gain
big can vs, small can TA readings, 195 "oddity" case in
NED, 83
checking pc's grip, 265, 270, 271 off-line case actions,
128
cold cans and high TA, 198 overcharged case, recognition
and handling of, 97
cold cans, handling, 271 people talking about their
cases, 129
hands: see hands perverts are out of valence, 96
high TA caused by too big or too small cans, 199
psychoanalytic cases and Dianetic CS-1, 404
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
case(s) (cont.) case supervising, case supervision, C/Sing (cont.)
reasons for releasing charge from a, 29 "Case
Supervisor Actions" HCOB is still valid, 121
resistive case: see resistive case complete an
auditing cycle once begun, 115
ruthless personalities are out of valence, 96 cracking
most cases to a point where they run well,
service fac is the key to a pc's case, 458 250
snide personalities are out of valence, 96 cramming
auditors for every bog or flub, 145, 342
special cases, 102 C/Sing for quickie auditing for
"completion," 202
staff cases neglected, handling, 287 C/Sing in the
chair, mention of, 147
State of Case Scale, 27 C/Sing or auditing without
folder study, 202
two types of cases only that come up (in NED), 83 C/Sing
Scientology vs, Dianetics, 68
unresolving cases, 50 C/S only with all folders to hand,
115
what causes the case to "charge up," 28 Dianetic
C/Sing: see case supervising Dianetics
which do not resolve on actual motivators, 49
dictatorial martinet precision in requiring standard
who invites many to squirrel, 83 auditing, 83
case gain, no case gain, disregarded F/Ns, handling, 261, 281
all the reasons a pc won't advance if he has been run
doing "whole org" auditing actions, 115
on all processes up to that point, 119 double folder
danger, 115
auditing gives gains by deletion, 92 VIII actions are
all valid, 121
auditing over a W/H and PTP = no case gain, 126 example
of a typical and ideal program, 307
auditing pc over PTP won't make gains, 101 Exam Reports
from sick pc not getting into folder
betterment isn't occurring with Dianetics, handling,
before C/Sing it, handling, 128
102 failed sessions, reason for the majority of, 94
continuous PT overts is the only cause of no case false
auditing report, detection of, 254
gain, 291 false TA, when to handle it, 260
Dianetic case that makes no gain, handling, 82 FESer's
duty to indicate if pc made last grade and
drugs, zlcohol and medicine must be audited out is
set up for next grade, 283
before pc makes good case gain, 361 glossary of
C/S terms, 116
GF 40 "when all else fails," 120 hold the form of grades
and processes, 305
Grade 1, problems, is the usual reason for no case how to
tell auditors who have their metering or basic
gain, 119 definitions madly out, 101
handling pc chronically out of valence to the point of
ideal program for a pc, 307
no case gain, 39 ill after auditing but sessions look
alright, handling,
inability to hold case gains, what underlies it, 83
102
invalidated gains, symptoms and handling of, 180 illness
following auditing, handling, 219
jokers and degraders and no case gain, 291 insist on a
carbon copy of the fact that cramming has
M/W/Hs and no case gain, 2, 445 been done, 146
M/W/Hs vs, pc progress, 3 instant F/Ns, use of, 488
NED and case gains, 441 it's always the earlier
actions that are out, 148
NED case gain, what it depends on, 85 life knocking ruds
out faster than they can be audited
NED produces 80% more gain, 482 in, handling, 128
non-standardness and, 83 major action being done on a
sick pc, how to prevent
out of valence handling so pc himself begins to gain,
it, 128
152 monitoring sessions, 255
overts and, 445 most common goofs made by auditors, 37
pc claims he F/Ns too easily or too quickly when he
negative criticism undermines auditors, 82
has not had any gains, handling, 169 new grades
without having completed earlier grades,
pc does not resyond to auditing, handling, 181
reason for and handling of, 282
pc's manifestations and remarks never change, hand- no
auditing as the most basic failure of cases, 277
ling, 102 no reads on prepared lists, handling, 249
problemsand, 119 off-linecaseactions, 128
Progress Program to consolidate case gain which has
old-timer, standard action for an, 40
not been earlier achieved, 116 out of valence,
recognition and handling of, 96
PTPs and no case gain, 101, 126 445 pc can always be
solved in or below where he is, 148
PTS pcs will not hold their gain, 360 pc's manifestations
and remarks never change, hand "secret" of producing high case gain
and total results ling, 102
with NED and Scientology, 108 pc who has trouble
needs training, 117
self-auditing is detected by no lasting gain, 128 Power
Checklist, 302
standardness and case gain, 85 prepared lists, C/Sing
and use of, 249
textbook session and case gains, 3 procedure
violation, handling, 76
why there is no case betterment, 29 programming; see
programming
case supervising, case supervision, C/Sing, Quickie Grades,
answer to pc who had them, 116
actions a Solo auditor may and may not do, 127 remedy
for anyone W/Ced without a resolution of the
another auditor on the case hidden, reason, 256
difficulty, 263
another auditor unknown to the C/S, handling, 129
requiring pc to stay in a hotel away from the area of
asking what the auditor did, 100 enturbulation, 128
assessing a pc to higher levels to solve lower ones, 148
R/Sers, checklist to assist in the identification of, 230
assists in in the midst of grade auditing, 218 ruds,
how to C/S them, 165
bad auditing goofs, handling the student who makes,
set-ups: see set-ups
74 sick pc who should have another C/S entirely,
128
basic Case Supervisor Actions, 163 study rundowns,
programming of, 129
Case Supervisor Actions HCOB, 163 success story lacking,
what it means, 254
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
case supervising, case supervision, C/Sing (cont.) case supervising
Dianetics (cont.)
tech "doesn't work," handling, 255 reasons chains do
not erase, 100
tech quality, improvement of, 342 reasons Dianetic session
does not complete with
tips, 146 VGIs, 100
VGIs F/N cog at session end, but sour grapes at
relapsing onto drugs, how it affects running the case,
Examiner, 101 129
"Well Done," when to give one in Dianetics, 85 "secret"
of producing high case gain and total results
what is started on a case must be completed, 305
with NED and Scientology, 108
when all else fails use GF 40, 120 two types of cases
only that come up (in NED), 83
case supervising Dianetics, when to let a N~D auditor audit, 75
area of interest that hasn't read in Dianetics, hand- Case
Supervisor(s),
ling, 103 acting on a case without an FES, 202
"assess existing lists or add" and NED auditor says
acting on a case without an up-to-date Folder Sum
no items, handling, 102 mary, 202
auditor assessed by interest only, not by read, hand-
admin in auditing, 36
ling, 76 Advance Courses and C/S okay, 46
auditor can find no item in Dianetics, handling, 102
Advanced Course material insecurity, handling, 129
auditor sent pc earlier than basic, handling, 76 auditor
not following C/S instructions, 37
betterment isn't occurring with Dianetics, handling,
basic Case Supervisor actions, 163
102 being presented with lousy admin, 36
case that has had all possible NED gain, handling, 82
bonuses and, 202
case that makes no gain on NED due to case "oddity,"
books the C/S must know, 121
handling, 82 correction of, 251
commonest C/S for pc after Dianetic session that Dean of
Technology, 285
ends with high or low TA and/or Bls at Examiner,
does not see the pc, 36
101 does not talk to the auditor, 36
correct an auditor positively and refer to the Dianetic
dreaming things up, 85
HCOB, 82 ending off the session and sending it to
the C/S, 36
correcting a bad session, 75 expertise, 148
C/Sing Dianetics vs, Scientology, 68 falsifying a stat,
202
C/S point of view in NED, 82 FESers, how C/Ses depend
on them, 283
Dianetic case supervision, 58, 75, 82, 84 getting
sessions monitored, 144
Dianetic Clears, auditing of, 117 gold certificate Case
Supervisors, 285
Dianetic pc audited over out ruds, manifestations of
has to know his materials better than an auditor, 148
and handling, 101 illegal pcs, penalty for
acceptance of, 259
Dianetic pcs, how long to audit them on NED, 117
invalidations or accusations of auditors, 273
Dianetic session failures, four main reasons for, 100
lucky is the C/S who has a fine Class VIII, 83
four Dianetic errors that are detectable if C/S reads
must be confident he could crack the case as an audi
the worksheets, 100 tor, 148
four errors that are beyond the view of the C/S, 100
not checking folder to find if pc has made earlier
four possible actions for a NED C/S to take, 82
grades, 283
habitual drug taker, handling, 105 offenses that
result in two weeks loss of pav and a
how to spot failure to ask for earlier beginning, 100
suspension of certs, 202
how to spot failure to ask for earlier incident, 101
penalties for various offenses, 202
how to spot grinding in the session, 100 penalty for
permitting auditor to write incomprehen how to spot pc being
forced to go earlier below basic, sibly or omit data, 221
101 perfect C/S, how to be a, 148
Hubbard New Era Dianetics Graduate is required in Preclear
Checklist and, 365
order to C/S NED, 82 reasonable, C/S never gets,
101
if L3RF doesn't resolve it, 101 reason C/S must be an
excellent NED auditor, 109
illness following auditing, handling, 219 right to get
his programs completed, 213
jumped chains, how to spot it, 101 Senior C/S; see
Senior Case Supervisor
lots of DEFs and session ground to a high TA, 85
strengthening auditor's determination to be profes "L3RF Method
5 and Handle," 101 sionally competent, 273
misassessment in Dianetics, spotting it, 101 successful
C/S, how to be a, 148
NED Auditor Analysis Checklist, 492 suspension of
certs, reasons for, 202
NED auditor in a Dianetic session does nothing but what the
value of a Case Supervisor depends on, 85
NED, 82 when the C/S's job becomes unhappy, 85
NED case folder analysis, 100 where trouble a C/S is
running into comes from, 144
NED folders, C/Sing of, 75, 82, 84 Case Supervisor Comction
List, use of, 251
NED folders, how Ron handles them, 84 catastrophe,
NED pcs, when to give a GF, 83 handling its effects on a
person's life, 354
non-standard NED session requires pc be sent to Relief
RD to handle, 400
a Scientology auditor, 83 cause, causative,
"oddity" case in NED, 83 attaining cause over life, 473
pc has not done well on Dianetics and no other reason
engrams are the record of moments when a thetan
can be found, handling, 192 was least at cause,
29
pc who gets sad at session end in Dianetics, handling, Ex
Dn audits pc at cause, 305
101 imaginary cause, 49
physically ill pcs, handling, 102 Sec Checking audits the
case at cause, 305
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
cause, causative (cont.) chain(s) (cont.)
Sweat Program making one more causative, 326 previous
flubbed chains, handling, 142
cave in, caved in, reason all picture chains are there, 80
cases which "cave in hard," handling, 49 reason for
staying on the chain of only one somatic in
pc wound up at Examiner caved in, handling, 171
Dianetics, 62
CCHs, reference, 471 reasons chains do not erase, 100
certainb, number of times over the material equals rehabbing
chains, commands for 141
certainty and results, 73 same thing run twice,
handling, i38
certificate(s), cert(s), certified, certifying, takes more
than one chain of engrams to build up an
certifying a NED auditor who doesn't get provenly
ill area, 92
excellent results is an act of treason, 109 things
that can cause a pc to key-in chains, 124
false auditing reports causing cancellation of, 282
too late on the chain, handling, 136
forbidden to run new techniques without being prop-
went past basic on a chain, handling, 137
erly trained and certified, 483 what happens when
the basic on the chain is found
gold certificate Case Supervisors, 285 and erased,
29
permanent certificates, interneships as prerequisite
what you're erasing, 474
for, 285 will key-in again if you don't get the
basic engram, 70
provisional certificates and interneships, 285 chair, pc is
seated in chair furthest from the door, 381
suspension of certs, reasons for, 202 changes, handling severe
changes in person's life, 362,
chain(s); see also engram running; Routine 3RA 400
abandoned chain, handling, 139 charge,
all picture chains are there because the first time is
allowing pc to get all the charge and postulates out of
there, 80 basic, 344
always end up in a basic engram, 70 ARC breaks and, 28
asking pc to look for an erased chain, effects of, 141
bulk of the charge on the time track lies in engrams,
bank (chains) is jammed when auditing over drugs, 29
105 chronic charge defined, 29
basic and postulate hold chain in place, 80 "chronic
meter of a case" is an index of chronic
blowing by inspection, 388 charge, 28
charge is held in place by the basic, 28 definition,
27, 28, 29, 409, 424
completing chains, reason for, 388 E-Meter registers
charge, 28
definition, 62, 410 E-Meter registers released charge,
28
Dianetic chain is not a release, 142 how charge is
discharged, 29
don't use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic chain,
incident left too heavily charged in Dianetics, hand 142
ling, 137
effect of running several somatic chains without eras-
instant F/N and, 487
ing any, 71 is held in place by the basic on a
chain, 28
ending off a chain or engram at the first sight of an is
the sole thing being removed by the auditor from
F/N, 131 the time track, 27
engram running by chains, 25, 380 no charge on the item in
the first place, 136
engram running by chains and Narrative R3RA-an out of
valence and, 96
additional difference, 476 overcharged case,
recognition and handling of, 97
EP of a Dianetic chain, 62, 66, 125, 262, 332, 344,
preassessment item had no charge on it, handling, 137
384, 388, 391, 403, 451, 480 Prepchecks as a
method for releasing charge, 470
erased chains can be overrun, 143 prevents pc from
confronting the time track, 28
example of how a typical Dianetic chain might run, reads
and, 487
416 reason for reducing the charge on the existing
track,
example of how a typical narrative item might run, 25
417 reasons for releasing charge from a case, 29
high TA and unflat or restimulated engram chains, time
track and the, 27
124 time track is submerged from view by, 28
high TA caused by chains left in restimulation, hand-
what causes the case to "charge up," 28
ling, 433 checklist(s),
high TA due to running incident on the chain without Ex
Dn set-ups checklist, 225
going earlier, 71 False TA Checklist, 267
how chains are held together, 69, 353 for FESers, 282
how many chains can come from an Original Assess- for
setting up sessions and an E-Meter, 322
ment, 353 Full Assist Checklist for Injury and
Illness, 250
how pc gets onto an entirely different chain, 480 NED
Auditor Analysis Checklist, 492
jumped chains; see jumped chains Power Checklist, 302
late things hang up where earlier like things exist, 428
Preclear Checklist, 365
narrative vs, somatic chains, 79 to assist in the
identification of R/Sers, 230
not completed, handling, 136 checkout(s),
not enough auditing on enough chains, 122 High Crime
checkouts and interneships, 328
overrun, effects and handling of, 480 interneship
students do their own checkouts, 284
overrun past postulate on chain, effects of, 384, 392,
checksheets(s),
480 are gone through in the sequence laid down, 74
postulate bypassed, handling, 136 end of endless training,
breakthrough, 483
postulate holds chain in place, 62, 80, 262, 384, 392,
interneship checksheets being added to and added
480 to,285
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
checksheet(s) (cont.) Classification Gradation and Awareness Chart,
The
materials that must be added to certain checksheets,
Bridge,
293 basic program of a pc is, 228
mile long checksheets not required to make a good C/S
Series 1-13RA cover use of the Grade Chart in
Dianetic auditor, 359 programming, 228
Okay to Audit Checksheet, 248 definition, 117
PTS/SP Checksheet, study of, 244, 245, 246, 276 Drug RD
position on the, 226
chest trouble, handling, 92 Expanded Dianetics position on, 279
child, children, Expanded Dianetics, when it can be run, 241
are usually burdened cases, 233 full list of grades
showing where the various RDs
can size for a, 196,268 now offered fit, 227
childbirth, running out the engram of delivery, 65 new
Grade Chart, 226
getting stuck in the books and movies they see, hand-
programming and, 228
ling, 234 Quad vs, Expanded Grades, 226
LX Lists and, 97 technical breakthroughs, 482
overcharged cases, handling of, 97 clay,
past life remedies and, 233 auditor must be able to relate
all the EP of a process
R/Ses and, 38 to an F/N in clay, 42
unburdening of, 234 things student is weak on are done
in clay, 74
choice, clean, pc hard to clean, handling, 172
freedom of choice returned with Routine 3SC-A, 468 clean needle,
restoring power of choice, 29 complete list and, 21
R/S causing no freedom to choose, 462 definition, 21
service fac destroys freedom of choice, 458 is vital in
order to null a list in Routine 2, 22
chronic somatic(s), Routine 2 methods for converting a dirty
needle to a,
handling with Dianetics, 127 21
persistent, chronic and recurring somatics, handling,
Clear(s); see also Dianetic Clear
122 assists and, 91, 117, 150, 215
programming of pc who has a, 125 can be achieved on
Dianetics, 117
references, 122 Clears or OTs who are R/Sing are not
R/Sers, 478
something which continually hurts or disables may be
definition, 422
structural or physical, 91 Dianetic Auditing
Assists, secondaries, engrams or
unresolved pains, two reasons for, 122 narrative
incidents are no longer run on, 215
circulation, Dianetic Clear defined, 117
cut off by LSD, 324 Dianetics forbidden on, 91, 150, 473
exercise and, 325 Dianetics not run on, 215, 389, 482
fat tissue has little circulation in it, 339 illness,
handling on, 91
in fat is poor, 325 pc went Clear and nobody would let
him declare,
Class 0, W/Cing materials added to, 293 handling, 140
Class II, Confessional materials added to, 293 State of Case
Scale and, 27
Class IV, clearing commands,
course necessities (checksheet additions), 293 auditor
responsibility to ensure pc understands the
materials that must be known, 293 commands and
procedure, 433
Senior Class IV and, 293 clearing word lists for
prepared lists, 252
Class VIII, engram running prevented by failure to clear com
Advanced Orgs teaching Cl VIII Course, 287 mands and
procedures of R3RA, 433
auditor who thinks he can fly before he can even example,
442
creep, 41 F/Ns obtained during, 443
Case Supervisor Actions HCOB, 163 have pc on cans
throughout, 442
"Case Supervisor Actions" HCOB is still valid, 121 penalty
for failure to clear each word of every com
Class VIII Drug Rundown commands, 176 mand or list
used, 204
course being repackaged in its original form and ex-
procedure, 442
ported, 287 question reads and pc says he
doesn't understand it,
difference between a probably six months or 3-week
handling, 135
course, 44 reads during, 438, 443
VIII actions, 118 references, 442
VIII actions are all valid, 121 rules of, 442
first thing I learned about teaching a Class VIII audi-
Scientology CS-1 does not preclude clearing com
tor, 41 mands, 421
IV Rundown, reason it was developed, 120 violation of
correct clearing of commands is an ethics
idea that the "old" is always cancelled by anything
offense, 444
"new," 118 when to do it, 443
lucky is the C/S who has a fine Class VIII, 83 Clearing
Course L7 and, 252
out of valence handling, 152 clothes, tight, 266, 272
study of the "Well Done" LRH C/S folder, 44 co-audits,
what VIII standardization aimed at, 119 materials on
co-audits added to Senior Cl IV check
what the course will teach and include, 35 sheets,
293
why an VIII who is not a proven Dianetic auditor is
staff and, 287
not dependable as an auditor, 109 coffee shop
auditing,
why VIII auditing was developed, 119 definition, 128
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
coffee shop auditing (cont.) communicate, communication(s), comm,
dirty needle and, 7 art and, 319
cognition(s), Axiom 28 amended, 204
definition, 410, 424 chopped comm and high TA, 124
F/N and, 48, 72 component parts of, 204
F/N VGIs yet no cognition (in Dianetics), handling,
definition, 204, 411, 425
343 duplication is what makes communication work in
interrupted (in Dianetics), handling, 139
processes, 439
is totally dependent upon the freedom to know, 298 formula
of, 204
no cognition, reason for, 298 less willingness to
communicate, remedy of, 439
postulate vs,, 403, 480 non-communication, what it
consists of, 204
postulate will usually come off in the form of a, 480
overrun and cutting pc's comm, 42
Solo cognitions, what they depend upon, 145 Tone Scale
position and, 439
cold (temperature), two-way comm; see two-way communication
chilled pc and high TA, 198 what makes communication work
in processes, 439
cold cans and high TA, 198 when to cut a pc's comm with
regard to an F/N, 42
cold cans, handling, 271 communication cycle, definition,
409, 423
high TA and cold pc, 196 communication lag(s), comm lag(s),
pain and, 10 auditor or auditing failures due to, 94
pc cold, handling, 196, 272 lack of speed in giving
commands, 100
colds, losses and, 219 slow auditor, handling, 94
coma, assist procedure on pc in a, 219 speed of commands vs,,
388
combination terminal, combined terminal, coterm, competence,
competent,
definition, 11 competence or incompetence is not the
basis of psy method of testing for, 12 chosis, 313
pain and sensation is turned on by, 12 professional
competence and pride, 273
command(s); see also question strengthening auditor's
determination to be profes auditor goofed on a sequence of commands in
Dia- sionally competent, 273
netics, handling, 136 complaint(s); see also troubles
auditor responsibility to ensure pc understands the
don't be reasonable about pc's complaints, 5
commands and procedure, 433 main complaints and
symptoms of pcs, 360
auditor stopped giving commands, handling (in Dia-
resistive case and, 181
netics), 138 complete list,
clearing commands; see clearing commands clean needle
and, 21
duplicating an auditing question without variation only
reasons a list will not complete on Routine 2, 20
(TR3), 160 Routine 2 and, 21, 22
evaluation by telling pc what the word or command
completion(s), completed; see also Paid Completions
means, 442 bonuses may not be paid for
"completions," 202
flubbed commands, 100 definition of the completed
intensives stat, 214
flubbed commands in Dianetics, handling, 136 Dianetic Case
Completion, Preclear Checklist must
forgetting the commands during session, handling, 86
be complete before attesting to, 365
fumbling commands, 108 Ex Dn case histories were incomplete
giving the idea
getting the command answered (TR3), 160 that one
didn't complete Ex Dn cases, 312
lack of speed in giving commands, 100 Ex Dn cases must be
completed, 294
misunderstood command, effects of, 442 Major Processing
Service defined, 316
misunderstood on the command, handling, 136 Major
Training Service defined, 316
misusing command sequence or procedure, handling, Minor
(Division 6) Services defined, 317
86 Paid Completions simplified, 316
never ask second question until the one asked is pcs
completed as a D of P stat, 214
answered, 160 penalty for C/Sing or delivering
quickie auditing for
pc confused about the meaning of commands, hand-
"completion," 202
ling, 442 penalty for not working for a product of
a fully com
pc didn't have a command in Dianetics, handling, 136
pleted pc on that grade, 202
penalty for failure to clear each word of every com-
what is started on a case must be completed, 305
mand or list used, 204 complex, student who goofs is
being, 81
question reads and pc says he doesn't understand it,
compulsions, handling of, 156
handling, 135 computation, definition, 456
speed of commands in R3RA, 388 concentrate, inability to, 83
training the student how to deliver a command condition(s),
(TRI), 159 LX1 conditions, handling, 490
TR3: Duplicative Question, 160 LX1 (Conditions) list, 99
comment, definition, 162 misunderstood case condition,
handling, 167
Committee of Evidence; see also penalties Confessional(s); see also
Integrity Processing; Security
for accepting or processing illegal pcs, 259 Checking
for failing to make out and include worksheets in pc's
adapting Confessional questions to the pc, 296
folder, 257 break the problem down to its most
fundamental
for falsifying an auditing report, 255 expression,
299
for letting pc attest Dianetics Case Completion before
cancellation of HCOBs on Integrity Processing, 295
Preclear Checklist is complete, 365 dirty needle
and, 459
for losing pc's folders, 257 Expanded Dianetics and,
279
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Confessional(s) (cont.) Contact Assist(s) (cont.)
form (A Valid Confessional), 300 procedure, 55, 150
formula for making up a, 298 reference, 150
formulating Confessional questions, 297 theory of, 55
going into person's most confused emotional areas, theory
of what an assist is doing, 217
297 Touch and Contact Assists interrupting a
general
going straight to a person's handling of masses and
course of auditing, handling, 128
changes of space, 297 worksheet is required, 129
handling zones of difficulty with, 298 contemptuous personality,
96
Integrity Processing, Sec Checking and, 278 continuous
overt(s),
materials on Confessionals added to Grade Il, 293
handling, 185
never subtract anything from a, 296 no case gain and,
291
nouns and, 299 PTS and environmental continual overt, 50
problem of long duration, handling, 299 contribution, art
and, 319
PTPs of pc looked at for areas to handle with Con- control,
auditor being doubtful of control in engram
fessionals, 299 running, 381
rules for, 299 correction, tech correction round-up, 274
Sec Checking vs, Integrity Processing, 278 correction lists;
see prepared lists
tech correction round-up data concerning, 278 cortisone,
235
what a Confessional clears up, 297 coterm; see combination
terminal
what areas to do the Confessional on, 297 course(s); see also
study; training
writing a special series of questions for, 296
application; see application
confidence, definition, 328
improving pc's confidence, 7 Dianetics Course; see
Dianetics Course
pc confidence lies in how standard the auditor is, 3
end of endless training, breakthrough, 483
confidentiality of upper level RDs, 479 enrolling on courses but
not taking them in order to
confront(ing); see also TR 0 get professional rates in
auditing, 284
charge prevents pc from confronting the time track,
fast courses, 328, 483
28 graduate described, 328
handling students confronting with their eyes, blink-
how you get a course text weighing one ton, 80
ing, etc, 158 interneships being used to teach the
course again, 328
havingness is proportional to pc's ability to confront
interneships vs,, 328
in the session, 23 Major Training Service
defined, 316
increased by Sweat Program, 326 Minor (Division 6)
Services defined, 317
largest reading items are ones pc can most easily con-
necessities, 293
front, 355 passing grade will be 85% to get on
interneships, 329
OT TR 0 and, 157 person having real trouble on a course,
handling, 251
procedure, 158 product of a, 328
rough auditing lowers pc's ability to confront in the
retread course if no passing grade is obtained, 329
session, 23 staff courses made mandatory, 286
that which is not confronted and inspected tends to
study rundowns should be done at the start of courses,
persist, 457 129
the more he isn't confronting, the less he can con-
theory and, 328
front, 457 well-run course described, 328
TR 0: Confronting Preclear, 158 Course Supervisor(s),
with a body part, 158 checking students on a meter for
misunderstoods, 149
confusion(s), confused, correction of, 251
Confessionals going into person's most confused
interpretation or evaluation not allowed, 74
motional areas, 297 steps to speed student product
flow, 149
engram of accident or injury can be a stable item in Course
Supervisor Correction List, use of, 251
a, 219 Court of Ethics; see also penalties
fixed ideas follow a period of, 219 ethics penalty for
Word Clearers, 335
flubs in TRs are the basis of all confusion in subse-
faulty W/Cing and, 264
quent efforts to audit, 157 for failing to write
clearly on worksheets, 221
pc confused about the meaning of commands, hand- for
going by MUs in despatches or telexes, 221
ling, 442 penalties for violations of study tech,
203, 221
stable datums, service facs and, 456 cramming,
teaching of basic data restimulates confusions, 74 auditors
who quickie Objectives, handling, 333
consequences, LSD case and, 315 bogged by a mis-cram,
handling, 345
constructive criticism, 320 C/S should insist on a carbon copy
of the fact that
Contact Assist(s), cramming has been done, 146
checking for overrun, 151 errors that can occur in, 345
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears may receive, 150, 215
handling the student who makes bad auditing goofs,
EP of, 150 74
F/N and, 217 how to check auditor's grasp of R3RA
theory and
how long to do one, 217 procedure, 496
in making them touch something that was moving,
invalidations or accusations of auditors, 273
stop it first, 151 mis-crammed person, handling,
345
in making them touch things that were hot, cool them
NED Auditor Analysis Checklist and, 492
first, 151 NED auditor not correcting with ordinary
cramming,
mandatory to take pc to Examiner afterwards, 129
handling, 492
no F/N, handling, 151 NED auditor trouble areas and
misunderstoods, find-
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
cramming (cont.) Danger Condition,
ing and handling of, 492 Ethics, Correct Danger
Condition Handling, refer
out TRs and metering caused by lack of, 342 ence,
251
send auditors to Cramming on all flubs, 146 First Dynamic
Danger Formula, 211
sending auditors to Cramming for the slightest flub, data,
144 stable datum; see stable datum
sending auditor to Cramming for every bog, 342 take the
pc's data, never take his orders, 381
student is sent to Cramming at own expense for bad teaching
of basic data restimulates confusions, 74
auditing goofs, 74 Data Series Course, handling slow
students on, 251
tech quality, improvement of, 342 date(s), dating,
"Two hours TRs and metering" should always be date
boldly with no throat catches or hesitations, 26
added, 342 false date in Dianetics, handling, 138
Cramming Officer(s), fumbled dating gets no dates, 26
clearing up an org or area messed up by, 345 there was no
date for an incident in Dianetics, hand
NED Auditor Analysis Checklist and, 492 ling,
138
overt products and, 345 watchwords of dating, 26
R/Sing Cramming Officer, effect of, 345 wrong date in
Dianetics, handling, 138
Cramming Repair Assessment List, 345 Date/Locate,
creating, creation; see also destruction Date/Locate the
point of exteriorization, 177
drugs and, 105, 176 Dianetic errors that may require a
D/L,135,136,
effects of aspirin and pain depressants on the creation
137, 138, 139
of mental image pictures, 104 dead horse, cause of, 17,
44
crime(s), "dead thetan" read, drugs and, 105
be sure to get the crime back of the R/S, 172 deafness,
Dianetics and, 66, 67
caused by people who R/S, 242 Dean of Technology, reference,
285
High Crime; see High Crime death(s), dead, see also losses;
secondary
criminal(s), criminalib, dead bodies read between 2,0 and
3,0, 199
evil intentions and, 240 handling losses by death, 362
Ex Dn data and criminality, 279 handling of (on Original
Assessment Sheet), 155
Nazi criminal outgrowths, 259 of relative or child,
handling its effects on a person's
critical, criticism(s), life, 354
art and, 320 past death was restimulated (in
Dianetics), handling,
handling nattery or critical pc, 169 140
invalidative criticism and art, 320 pc in recent shock
of having died, handling, 233
M/W/Hs and, 3, 41 decay, non-optimum personal existence
and, 216
negative criticism undermines auditors, 82 deception, alcohol
use and, 175
out of valence, critical personalities are, 96 declare; see
also attest
pc critical of orgs or people of Scientology, 3 failure
to declare, reason, 255
people critical of Scientology, 3 multiple declare defined,
120
those who destructively criticize can't do, 320 pc went
Clear and nobody would let him declare,
two types of, 320 handling, 140
C/S; see case supervision; Case Supervisor DEF (R3RA commands),
CS-1; see Dianetic CS-1; Scientology CS-1 commands, 383, 391
C/S Series 53RK, failing to ask for DEF again when pc says "it's
erased"
description, 249 but TA high, 130
Method 5 and, 249 how the C/S spots failure to ask for
earlier incident,
practically handles the whole repair of any difficult
101
case, 249 how the C/S spots grinding and failure to
ask for
symptoms that indicate need of, 168 earlier
beginning, 100
uses of, 168, 249 if it had lots of DEFs and ground to
a high TA, 85
C type case, 83 pc's not-is of the picture squeezing it into
invisibility,
culture, failing material culture, 380 handling with DEF,
130
cure(s), curing; see also healing definition(s),
illnesses that were against the law to cure, 64 glossary
of C/S terms, 116
"incurable" illnesses and auditing, 92 how to tell
auditors who have their metering or basic
Man dreams about "one-shot" cures, 91 definitions
madly out, 101
NED and, 358 looking up words you don't understand in
a defini we're not in the business of curing psychos, 242
tion, 334
why a civilization would make it illegal to cure illness,
technical, specialized or obsolete definitions, 334
64 which ones to clear in W/Cing, 334
cycle of action, Word Clearing definitions, 334
auditor's inability to see when a cycle of action is
degradation,
complete, 42 implants and, 30
complete an auditing cycle once begun, 115 universe is
not a trap capable only of degradation, 29
degraders, jokers and, 291
deletion, auditing gives gains by, 92
D delivery
delivery repair lists, 248
delivery stats Why, 253
danger(s), no auditing vs,, 276
engram matching PT dangers, handling, 181 package sales
and Paid Comps, 317
handling of (on Original Assessment Sheet), 156 Paid
Completions simplified, 316
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
delivery (cont.) Dianetic(s), New Era Dianetics (cont.)
slow in delivery, remedy of, 276 demonstration of how R3RA
works, 406
teeh eorreetion round-up data eoneerning, 276
destimulation in 3 to 10 days, 71
"Value of Serviees Delivered" stat, 276 Dianetie
Assists HCOB, 55
delusion(s), delusive, Dianetie Clear defined, 117
aleohol use and, 175 Dianetie Student Reseue Intensive,
111, 399
don't audit someone during a drug delusion state, 176
don't eonfuse it with medieal or other praetiees, 360
drugs render thetan delusive, 105 earlier Dianetie upset
was restimulated, handling, 138
how drugs produee it, 176 early assessment methods, 396
running imaginary ineidents runs off delusion, 232 80% more
gain produeed by NED, 482
demo kit and CS-1, 404, 418 ending Dianeties, 389
demonstrations, Dianetie CS-1 and, 405 EP of a Dianetie ehain,
62, 66,125, 262, 332, 343,
denyer, 384, 388, 391, 403, 451, 480
example, 480 EP of ehain, how to get it, 343
postulates ean be eonfused with, 480 EP of Dianetie
auditing, 360
despatches, going by MUs in, 221 errors, examples of, 76
destimulate, destimulation, errors, list of the most frequent
ones and how to
definition, 71 handle, 135
in 3 to 10 days, 71, 124 errors, major ones, 108
destruction, destructive; see also ereation example of how a
typieal narrative item might run,
eonstructive vs, destructive motive, 313 417
jokers and degraders and, 291 Ex Dn is not mixed with,
441
psychosis and, 313 Ex Dn, NED is a requisite for, 441
those who destructively criticize can't do, 320 "failed
pcs," reason for the bulk of them, 109
what Man does when he finds he is being too destruc-
failed sessions due to lack of speed, 94
tive, 313 F/N indicated too soon, handling, 135
where the destructiveness of Man stems from, 312 F/Ns
calling of, 61, 262, 388, 403, 480
"detached" lower grade case, handling, 39 forbidden on Clears
and OTs, 91, 150, 473
Dianetic(s), New Era Dianetics; see also engram running;
forbidden to run new techniques without being prop Routine 3RA
erly trained and certified, 483
addresses the body, 68 Full Flow Dianetics; see Full Flow
Dianeties
alcoholism and, 69 gain of cases on NED, what it
depends on, 85
area of interest that hasn't read, handling, 103 gains of
NED, 441
arthritis and, 69 goal lines of well and happy human
beings and a well
asking for list items, 70 and happy society, 85
aspirin and other pain depressants, how they affect
going sour on Dianetics, reason for, 344
auditing, 104 Green Form and, 76
assessment; see assessment Green Form, when NED pc gets
a, 83
audited over an ARC break, problem or withhold (in habitual
drug taker, handling, 105
Dianetics), handling, 139 had never been
unworkable, 118
auditing out sessions, 79, 156 handles locks,
secondaries and engrams, 61
auditing out sessions, references, 364 handle the illness
or disability the pc offers, 67
awarenesses are what we are trying to run in, 69
headaches and, 60
bad auditing goofs, handling the student who makes,
"headaches," assessing and running of, 69
74 high TA at session start, handling, 130
basic definitions, 59 high TA handling with R3RA, 71
basic Dianetic errors, 59 high TA in, 71
basic use of, 65 history of, 57, 358
beginning a pc on, 155 how long to audit pe on NED, 117
betterment isn't occurring, handling, 102 how we could
lose an entire subject, 118
blindness and, 66 ideas or think are not handled in,
61
burns and, 66 illness and, 67, 91
cancelled issues, list of, 436 ill pc, handling, 85
certifying a NED auditor who doesn't get provenly Injury
Rundown, 153
excellent results is an act of treason, 109 "insane"
handling of, 65, 84
changes in methods, reason for, 380 instant F/N is
always handled first, 355
charge on previous auditing, handling, 155 instant F/N
takes precedence over all other reads, 487
childbirth, running out the engram of delivery, 65 Int
actions and, 103
chronically ill pc and, 56 interest and, 63, 67, 70
Class VIII Drug Rundown commands, 176 IQ raised by, 66
Clear can be achieved on, 117 it's the postulate-not
the F/N that we are going for
Clears or above not run on, 389, 482 in NED, 62
command change, 343 it takes as long as it takes, 344
commands; see Routine 3RA legality of, 64
correcting a bad session, 75 longest read or pc's
interest, 63
correct use of, 65 losses and, 66
C/Sing Dianetics; see case supervising Dianetics L3RF to
handle trouble, 364
C/S Series 54RA, 155 medical examination and, 91
cures and, 358 medical terms or symptoms, never assess
them, 69
deafness and, 66, 67 mentally retarded and, 65
definition, 408 miracles and, 344, 358
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Dianetic(s), New Era Dianetics (cont.) Dianetic(s), New Era Dianetics
(cont.)
misapplications, handling the auditor, 492 service fac
handling, 463
mixing Scientology and, 68, 76 severe changes in
person's life, handling, 400
NED auditing is so simple it demonstrates cleanly Single
Dianetics; see Single Dianetics
whether person can audit or not, 108 sinusitis
and, 70
NED auditor in a Dianetic session does nothing but skin
blotches and, 66
NED, 82 spiritual healing and, 64
NED for OTs; see NED for OTs TA action, Dianetic
auditor is not concerned with, 474
NED High Crime, 473 tech "out" in an area because some
auditors can't
nine things that can go wrong in a NED session, 100
deliver simple Dianetic sessions, 109
no conflict of interest between any healing profession
"total-apathy-won't answer" session upset, handling
and, 57 as a list error, 192
no gain, handling, 82 Triple Dianetics; see Triple
Dianetics
non-standard session requires pc be sent to a Scien-
two types of cases only that come up (in NED), 83
tology auditor, 83 unhappy school experiences
handled by, 66
"oddity" case in NED, 83 unresolved pains, two reasons
for, 122
one is handling the effect of the spirit on the body, 64
use of, 64, 68
operations and Dianetic handling, 65 use R3RA even to
correct ARC breaks and PTPs and
Original Assessment Sheet, handling of, 155 bad
auditing, 67
out of valence handling, 357 valence handling, 357
out ruds and, 76 very sick pcs, handling, 84
overrun, effects and handling of, 480 violent session
upset, handling as a list error, 192
past life remedies, 232 well and happy pc (being) and,
85,350,353,360,
pastoral counselling and, 64 389, 441
pc has done something harmful to Dianetics, hand- what it
handles, 57, 65
ling of, 156 what one is handling in, 64
pc has not done well on Dianetics and no other reason
when to let a NED auditor audit, 75
can be found, handling, 192 why Dianetics fell out of
use, 64
pc says it's gone but no full EP, 78 Dianetic Assist(s),
Auditing Assist(s),
pc's manifestations and remarks never change, hand-
can be given despite pc having taken drugs, 106
ling, 102 can be run Quad, 151
playing Scientology auditing against NED, 83 Clears, OTs
and Dianetic Clears are no longer run
postulate vs, F/N in NED, 262 on, 215
precision drills and, 358 Dianetic Clears and, 117, 215
Prepcheck is not done while doing Dianetics, 143
Dianetics forbidden on Clears and OTs, 91
procedure violation, C/S handling of, 76 EP of, 150
product of, 360 "psychic trauma" and, 56
program outline in full, 360 references, 150
psychosomatic illness and, 57, 65 what it consists of, 56
PTSness handled before you begin auditing, 360 Dianetic
auditor(s),
put down only the list items pc says, 70 books he
should know, 358
Quadruple Dianetics; see Quadruple Dianetics demanded more
than pc could see, handling, 138
rashes and, 66 does not have to know how to do GFs or
ruds, 76
rate of healing and, 65 does nothing but NED in a
Dianetic session, 82
reason C/S must be an excellent NED auditor, 109 doesn't
know auditing works, handling, 499
reason for conflict between psychiatry and, 57 doing
odd things because auditor gets nervous, 86
reason for staying on the chain of only one somatic, 62
failed sessions due to lack of speed, 94
reason it was originally designed, 57 failures, reason
for, 63
reasons session does not complete with VGIs, 100
forgetting the commands during session, handling, 86
recovery from disease under treatment is speeded up
goofed on a sequence of commands, handling, 136
by, 65 high or low TA at session start,
handling, 449
remedies, 363, 433 high TA at session start, handling,
130
remedies anything caused by the mind, 66 how to tell
auditors who have their metering or basic
repair flubbed session or chain within 24 hours with
definitions madly out, 101
L3RF, 156 Hubbard New Era Dianetics Graduate is
required in
repairing a chain or engram, 135 order to C/S NED,
82
results, 68, 75, 108 length of time to train one, 66, 483
results are achieved by addressing and handling the
metering, steps to check it, 495
spirit, 360 misunderstoods of NED auditor,
finding and hand
results are a well body and a being happy with it, 68
ling the, 492
results depend on state of training and accuracy of
misusing command sequence or procedure, handling,
application, 358 86
results vs, deviating from exact procedure, 75 NED
Auditor Analysis Checklist, 492
review and the Dianetic pc, 58 not cert;ficate trained
on NED but trying to run it
roller-coaster on NED, handling, 83 (High Crime),
473
ruds done by a Scientology auditor, 76 Objective Processes
and, 358
running out previous auditing, 79, 155 out-ethics as an
auditor, handling, 499
Scientology result sometimes attained with, 68 pc was
held up by the auditor, handling, 139
Scientology vs,, 58, 60, 65, 68 references he should be
familiar with, 407
"secret" of producing high case gain and total results
refused to accept what pc was saying, handling, 138
with NED and Scientology, 108 Scientology vs,
Dianetic auditor, 58
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Dianetic auditor(s) (cont.) Dianetic item(s) (cont.)
slow auditor, handling, 94 taking an item that doesn't
read in R3RA, 100
smooth Dianetic auditor never increases the solidity
trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item,
of the bank, 474 handling, 140
stopped giving commands, handling, 138 unreading items,
effects of trying to run them, 475
study difficulties, handling, 499 unreading item, why it is
hard if not impossible to
teaching of, 74 run, 130
what a student needs to know and do to acquire the what
happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
skill of a, 358 run on later items, 132
what is expected of, 58 wording of the item was
changed, handling, 139
when to let a NED auditor audit, 75 wrong item,
handling, 137
why an VIII who is not a proven Dianetic auditor is Dianetic
list(s); see also running item list
not dependable as an auditor, 109 asking for
list items in Dianetics, 70
Dianetic Case Completion, Preclear Checklist and, 365 "assess
existing lists or add" and NED auditor says
Dianetic Clear(s); see also Clear no items, handling, 102
assists and, 117, 150, 215 auditor can find no item in
Dianetics, handling, 102
definition, 117 can act as an L&N list, 192
Dianetics is not run on, 117, 215, 389, 473, 482 can be
carried to an item that blows down and
Grades 0-IVand, 117 F/Ns, 192
service fac handling and, 463, 465 Dianetic list
errors, recognizing and handling of, 192
Dianetic CS-1; see also Scientology CS-1 laws of L&N
sometimes apply to a, 355
auditor responsibility to ensure pc understands the
listing for running items, 351
commands and procedure, 433 Dianetics and Scientology
Technical Dictionary, used in
foolish to run pcs on Dianetics without a, 135
Dianetic CS-1 session, 404
how long to do it, 433 Dianetics Course(s),
procedure, 405 checksheets and tapes and folders are
gone through
procedure for clearing words, 404 in the sequence
laid down, 74
programming of, 361 Dianetics: The Original Thesis and,
358
purpose of, 404 Dianetics Today and, 277
what happens to pc who does not understand R3RA DMSMH
and, 358
commands, assessment procedures, etc, 433 four
weeks or less to train a NED auditor, 483
word list, 412 how you get a course text weighing one
ton, 80
Dianetic item(s); see also original item; preassessment mile
long checksheets not required, 359
item; running item questions by the student,
handling, 74
abandoned item, handling, 139 schedule is rigid and
invariable, 74
after the fact item, choosing an, 100, 428 Student Hat
prerequisite, 358
after the fact items, examples, 78, 101, 428 teaching the,
74
asking for list items in Dianetics, 70 tech correction
round-up and, 277
"assess existing lists or add" and NED auditor says
things student is weak on are done in clay, 74
no items, handling, 102 well done and other
folders are studied, 74
assessment and how to get the, 350 what a student
needs to know and do to acquire the
assessment steps, 350 skill of a Dianetic auditor,
358
assessment, what you are attempting to accomplish Dianetics
Prepared Assessment Rundown,
when doing an assessment, 350 description, 363
auditor can find no item in Dianetics, handling, 102
EP, 364
check for read on, 124 procedure, 396
Dianetic list errors, recognizing and handling of, 192
programming of, 363
instant F/N and BD items are the best, 130 Dianetics: The
Modern Science of Mental Health and
instant F/N is a read, 487 NED, 358
instantly F/Ning item is taken up first, 487 Dianetics: The
Original Thesis, NED and, 358
invalidated item, handling, 139 Dianetics Today,
misassessment in Dianetics, spotting it, 101 definitions
taken from the glossary, 404
misworded item, handling, 139 Dianetics Course and, 277
multiple item, choosing a, 100 Dianetic Student Rescue
Intensive; see also Student
multiple item, example, 101 Rescue Intensive
no charge on the item in the first place, 136 EP, 399
noting reads while pc is giving items, 352, 355, 438 is
not a substitute for proper W/Cing, 363
not pc's item, handling, 137 procedure, 399
pc running an item that was different than the one
programming of, 363
assessed, handling, 139 dictionary, dictionaries,
procedure for getting in all flows, 133 clearing
commands and, 442
put down only the list items pc says, 70 definitions,
which ones to clear in W/Cing, 334
reason item must be mentioned in the command to Dianetic
CS-1 and, 404
the pc, 130 foreign language case and, 442
same or similar item has been run in the past, hand-
looking up words you don't understand in a defini
ling, 143 tion, 334
same thing run twice, handling, 138 Modern Management
Technology Defined 258
starting a new session with a new item with the TA rule
making it necessary to have them in auditing
way way up, 130 room, 442
suppressed item, handling, 139 specialized or obsolete
definitions, 334
taking a Dianetic item in which pc has no interest, 100
Thorndike Barnhart dictionaries, 404
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
dictionary, dictionaries (cont.) distraction(s) (cont.)
which ones are needed for a Scientology CS-1, 418 while
running an incident (in Dianetics), handling,
which ones auditor must have, 442 139
diet, divorce,
Sweat Program diet, 325 handling its effects on a
person's life, 354
underweight people and, 339 R/Ses and, 9
difficulty; see trouble dizziness, definition, 10
Director of Processing, DN; see dirty needle
assign fast auditors to fast pcs, 94 doctor; see medical
doctor
auditor asking D of P for an unusual solution, 36 doesn't want
auditing,
auditors picking and choosing pcs, 213 handling, 181
D of Pinterview, false auditing report revealed by, 255
handling with three textbook sessions of ruds and
invalidations or accusations of auditors, 273
Havingness, 7
major Why for becoming incapable of getting audi- pc not
desirous of being audited, 3
tors to audit per the schedule he writes, 213
resistive case and, 181
right to assign pcs without a lot of pick and choose D of P;
see Director of Processing
by auditors, 213 dominate, domination,
stats of, 214, 276 insistence upon survival, followed
by the necessity to
Director of Tech Services, stat of, 214, 276 dominate, 457
dirty needle(s), making the other fellow wrong in order to be
right, 457
auditing methods for cleaning a needle vs, Routine R/S
dominates the individual, 462
2 methods, 21 dope-off in session, handling, 433
caused by double questioning any ruds question, 6 DR; see dirty
read
caused by failure to use a textbook session, 6 DRD; see Drug
Rundown
caused by trying to clean off prior reads in ruds, 6 dream,
having a dream that the incident was going to
caused by using a scruffy and ragged session pattern, 6
occur, 400
causes of, 454, 459 dream therapy, 79
cleaning a, 459 drill(s)(ing); see also practical; training
coffee shop type auditing can rough a needle, 7 asking
assessment questions, drilling of, 430
Confessionals and, 459 NED command training drills, 86
definition, 3, 9, 12, 21, 454, 459 practical drilling
is done on the twin basis, 284
description, 6 drug(s),
don't ignore dirty needles, 460 actions of aspirin and
other pain depressants, 104
following up on, 459 addiction; see addiction
HCOB on, 6 alcohol; see alcohol
how to make pc's needle dirty, 6 Angel Dust, 106, 361
how to smooth out needles, 6 asking pc "Have you been
taking any drugs or as
if it still produces a dirty needle then there is more to
pirin?", 106
the W/H, 460 aspirin; see aspirin
M/W/Hs as cause of, 3 assists over drugs, handling, 218
out of session pc and, 6 audited over drugs (in
Dianetics), handling, 140
reasons pc still has a, 7 auditing assists can be given
despite the pcs having
references, 459 taken drugs, 106
Routine 2 and, 22 auditing over drugs, 106
Routine 2 methods for converting a dirty needle to auditing
over drugs or aspirin, effects of, 104
a clean needle, 21 blank due to, 105
R/S differentiated from, 455 creation and, 105, 176
three sessions of ruds and Havingness to handle, 6 cycle of
drug restimulation of pictures, 105
turning into an R/S, 459 "dead thetan" read and, 105
withholds and, 460 delusion, how drugs produce it, 176
dirty read, definition, 12 delusive due to, 105
disabilities, handling of, 67, 364, 395 don't audit someone
during a drug delusion state, 176
Disability Rundown, drag the thetan into heavily creating,
176
EP, 395 drug handling program, what it includes, 106
procedure, 395 effects of, 453
programming of, 364 enemies of various countries using
widespread drug
what it handles, 364 addiction as a defeatist
mechanism, 106
disassociated, LSD case is, 315 erasure inhibited by, 105
disaster, psychosis and, 313 ethics offense, drug or alcohol
addiction as an, 208
disease, recovery speeded up by Dianetics, 65
exteriorization often made impossible by, 453
dishonest(y), forgetful due to, 105
alcohol use and, 175 getting addicts off drugs, 129
definition, 210 habitual drug taker, handling, 105
dissemination, has taken drugs, handling, 181
M/W/Hs and dissemination failures, 3 high TA and, 105
penalty for failure to apply study tech in, 204 high TA
due to drug background, 132
distraction(s), hypnotics, 104
having pc wipe his hands every few minutes, 201 illegal
drug use, 129
preventing session interruptions, 322 insensitive due to,
105
setting up the room free from, 381 irresponsible due
to, 105
Solo auditing and, 145 LSD; see LSD
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
drug(s) (cont.) Drug Rundown (cont.)
medicines are drugs, 155 endless Drug RDs, reason for,
484
more on, 453 end of endless Drug RDs, breakthrough,
482
pain and, 453 end of endless Drug RDs, repair list, 485
pain-killers, 104 end of endless Drug RDs, theory, 484
pc currently on drugs, handling, 155 five parts of, 361
physical universe, using drugs as a defense against
Grade Chart position of, 226
the, 453 Life Repair and, 226
psychiatrists' gift to Mankind, 483 LSD case and, 324
psychotics and, 314 narrative handling of drugs, 362
reason chronic drug takers may go back to drugs needing
repair or redo must include study to see if
after auditing, 106 Objectives were honestly
run, 333
relapsing onto drugs, how it affects running the case, no
interest items, handling, 227
129 Objective Processes and, 362
seeking the same thrill attained from drugs, hand- omitted
or incomplete DRD, effects of, 226
ling, 181 Original Assessment and, 362
sensations blocked off by, 453 preassessment and, 362
sexual sensation and, 105 prior assessment to drugs or
alcohol and, 362
sexual sensation blocked off by, 453 programming of, 361
six weeks off drugs before auditing, 176 quickie
Objectives and, 333
six weeks until the drug has worn off, 106 reasons for;
361
somatics and, 105 references, 499
soporifics, 104 repair list, 485
study inability due to, 111, 363 sweating, heavy liquids,
exercise and, 315
stupid due to, 105 Sweat Program and, 324, 327
theory behind the use of, 453 three-way or quad recall,
secondaries and engrams on
three-way or quad recall, secondaries and engrams
drugs, 176
on, 182 what it includes, 227
tranquilizers, aspirin and, 104 whole track drugs not
asked for, 361, 484
unable due to, 105 why you can never run it flat, 484
unfeeling due to, 105 Drug Rundown Repair List, form, 485
unhandled drugs prevents pc from running engrams, dub-in,
433 drugs causing dub-in engram, 176
vitamins are not drugs, 176 dub-in of dub-in, 27
waiting for drugs to wear off, 105 state of case and,
27
what the least harmful pain depressant would be, 105
duplicate, duplicating, duplication; see also TR 3
whole track drugs not asked for on Drug RD, 361, 484
being less willing to reach and duplicate events of the
why more and more quantity and frequent use is re-
past, reason, 439
quired, 105 duplicating an auditing question
without variation
withdrawal symptoms eased by TRs and Objective
(TR3), 160
Processing, 106 is what makes communication work in
processes, 439
you can always find more drugs on the track, 484 less
willingness to duplicate, remedy of, 439
Drog Bomb, Tone Scale position and, 439
formula, 325 duration,
Sweat Program and, 326 definition, 410
drug case(s), druggie; see also addict false duration, handling,
138
"can't run engrams" is usually a drug case, 155 no
duration was found for the incident, handling, 138
compares Scientology sessions to former drug trips, pc
resented durations, handling, 138
176 there was an incorrect duration, handling, 138
dub-in engram as a symptom of, 176 dwindling spiral,
habitual drug taker, handling, 105 mechanics of, 457
hanging up in doing grades, 176 reversing the, 462
high TA and, 175 dynamic(s); see also various dynamics by number
idea that if you're numb nothing can hurt you, 453 charged
dynamics, handling, 251
looking for the same euphoria from a Scientology handling
zones of difficulty with Confessionals, 298
session as received during drug trips, 176 Dynamic Sort
Out Assessment, use of, 251
Objectives, why they work on drug users, 453
psychotic, drug addict is a, 304
seems unauditable on ARC Straightwire or above, 176
E
seldom goes backtrack well, 361
somatic, emotional and perceptic shut-offs, 361
symptoms of, 175, 182 earlier beginning,
why he won't go backtrack, 233 asking for earlier
beginning in engram running by
Drug Rundown, chains vs, in narrative running, 476
ARC Straightwire and, 226 checking for earlier beginning
after Step 9 R3RA,
checking auditor's grasp of drug handling theory
383, 390
and procedure, 498 command, 81, 383, 391
Class VIII alcohol handling, 175 demanding pc go through
non-basic more than twice,
Class VIII Drug Rundown commands, 176 effects of,
474
Dianetics, beginning a pc on, 155 earlier incident vs,,
474, 476
drug handling program, what it includes, 106 earlier
similar vs, earlier beginning in Narrative
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
earlier beginning (cont.) earlier similar (cont.)
R3RA, 79 commands for all flows of R3RA Narrative
running,
failure to call for earlier beginning when pc can find
386, 393
no earlier incident, 100 earlier beginning vs,
earlier similar in Narrative
finding it each time person is moved through the
R3RA, 79
narrative, 354 false TA causing auditor to ask for,
194
forcing pc toward "earlier incident" when it required it
is necessary to find an earlier item if something
"earlier beginning" making pc jump chains, 108
does not release, 445
how the C/S spots failure to ask for, 100 only going
E/S in narrative running if it starts to
late things hang up where earlier like things exist, 428
grind very badly, 79, 130, 344, 354, 386
lots of DEFs and session ground to a high TA, 85 ruds
earlier similar rule, 445
making a non-basic more solid by running through there
was no earlier similar incident, handling, 135
it several times, 474 EB; see earlier beginning
narrative erasure often depends on finding the, 400 effect,
narrative running and the importance of using the engrams
are the record of moments when a thetan
earlier beginning command, 386 was most at
effect, 29
no earlier incident, no earlier beginning in R3RA, pc who
is ill is easily made an effect, 95
handling, 388 person heavilv the effect of
something has done it as
not asking for earlier beginning causing no erasure, 131
an overt, 176
TA starting to climb and, 80 PTS handling audits the
pc at effect, 305
TA up even slightly indicates something earlier, 476 ego, 60
there was an earlier beginning, handling, 135 electricity,
electrical,
there was no earlier beginning, handling, 135 E-Meter
measures electrical resistance, 71
when an earlier incident takes precedence over, 476
mass resists electricity, 71
earlier incident, pain and, 10
asking for earlier incident in engram running by
resistance; see resistance
chains vs, in narrative running, 476 electric shock; see
shock treatment
auditor sent pc earlier than basic, handling, 76 electrodes;
see cans
checking for earlier incident after Step 9 R3RA, 383, E-
Meter(s), meter(s): see also reads
390, 474 accuracy of, 197
checking for earlier incident after the first run through
accuracy of a meter, what it depends upon, 200
(in R3RA), 384, 392 all you know when the needle
read, 33
command for R3RA, 383, 391 almost all confusions on meter
stem from inability to
commands for going earlier in R3RA Flows 2, 3 and do
TRs, 157
O, 385, 392 are the leads connected to the meter
and cans?, 269
demanding pc go earlier than basic, 100 assessment is
done by the auditor between the pc's
earlier beginning vs,, 474, 476 bank and the meter,
355
failure to call for earlier beginning when pc can find
assessment, look at meter while doing an, 355
no ear!ier incident, 100 calibration, 77
failure to call for earlier incident when there is one,
cans; see cans
100 charging of, 269
forcing pc toward "earlier incident" when it required
checklist for setting up sessions and an, 322
"earlier beginning" making pc jump chains, 108
"chronic meter of a case," 28
forcing the pc earlier than basic, 80 correctness of the,
194
high TA due to running incident late on the chain
demonstrating an F/N, R/S or theta bop on a meter
without going earlier, 71 with no pc or cord
connected, 239
how the C/S spots failure to ask for, 101 discharged
meter and high TA, 223
incident going more solid indicates an, 474 discharged
meter, remedy of, 195
late things hang up where earlier like things exist, 428
does not read on hand moisture alone, 260
no earlier incident, no earlier beginning in R3RA,
electrodes; see cans
handling, 388 false TA and discharged meter, 195
not asking for an earlier incident mentioning the false TA
due to the meter, handling, 269
same item causes a grind, 130 falsifying study
leads to falsifying meters, 200
overrun by demanding earlier than there is, 474 given a
contact the meter always tells the truth, 223
overrun, effects and handling of, 480 honesty and
results, 200
preventing pc from going earlier when he should, 80
idea that the E-Meter reacted to sweat on the hands,
procedure for going earlier in R3RA, 384, 392 71
pushing pc earlier after he has given ti1e postulate,
inoperable meter and high TA, 125
effects of, 480 inoperational meter does not mean
you have an
TA rising indicates something earlier, 80, 474, 476
R/Ser, 229
TA rising on Step 9 R3RA indicates something ear- leads;
see leads
lier, 384, 392 measures electrical resistance, 71
when it takes precedence over an earlier beginning,
mechanics of mass registering on the TA, 71
476 metering; see metering
when to ask for an, 61, 474 never feed meter data to pc,
141
earlier practices; see practices non-reading meters, 31
earlier similar, phenomena of pc occurs after phenomena of
meter,
asking for an earlier similar incident using Narrative
42
R3RA, 79 pinch test procedure, 405, 419
command for ruds, 445 putting pc's attention on the, 201,
235
command (Narrative R3RA), 79 reasons pc does not read
on, 31
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
E-Meter(s), meter(s) (cont.) end phenomena (cont.)
registers charge, 28 Disability RD EP, 395
registers released charge, 28 effect of ending off
before pc has given postulate in
resistance, TA and, 260 R3RA, 71
R/S caused by short circuit in, 238 errors that add up
to no erasure, 130
R/Ser, meter sometimes "goes crazy" on an R/Ser, F/N and,
48
229 HCOB on, 42
sensitivity; see sensitivity high TA due to EP not
reached, 124
71/2 volt current, 195 Identity RD EP, 357
should be left on a minute or two before trimming, 194 LX
Lists EP, 96, 489
skin oils on hands are needed to give electrical con-
narrative incident EP, 354
tact, 222 NED Rundown for OTs, EP of, 473
spare meter in session, 323 not allowing pc to fully view
basic, effect of, 344
sweat and, 71, 195, 222 Objective ARC, EP of, 356
TA depends on normally moist hands, 222 out of
valence processes, EP of, 96
temperature changes affecting trim, 77 pc says it's gone
but no full Dianetic EP, 78
testing the charge, 195, 269 phenomena of pc occurs
after phenomena of meter,
trim; see trim 42
what fluctuations of a meter during a session are Pictures
and Masses Remedy EP, 434
registering, 28 Power Processes and, 403
what happens on the E-Meter when you restimulate precise
instant to tell pc it's an F/N, 42
an engram, 71 Prepcheck button, EP for a, 470
works only when there is correct electrical contact, 222
pushing pc earlier after he has given the postulate,
emotion(s) ~al); see also misemotion effects of, 480
assists and emotional shock, 217 quickie Objectives and,
333
emotional shock; see shock Routine 3SC-A EP, 468
LSD case and, 315 ruds EP, 449
LX2-Emotional Assessment List, 98 Scientology process EP,
451
LX2 emotions, handling, 490 service fac handling EP, 468
misemotion and emotion are closely allied to motion, 10
Sweat Program EP, 341
shut off emotions reappearing on the Sweat Program,
220H EP, 96
326 enemies, how to win enemies and wrongly influence
shut-offs, 361 people, 279
End of Endless Int Repair RD, Int RD Correction List engram(s);
see also incident; Routine 3RA
vs,, 103 ARC breaks contained in, 29
end of session, are the record of moments when a thetan was
most at
auditor ends off if he can't handle on what the C/S
effect and least at cause, 29
says, 147 are what overwhelm the thetan, 29
ending session when you run into a snag you can't basic
engram, chains always end up in a, 70
handle, 36 basic holds the chain in place, 80
"End of Session" is used, 77, 451 becoming a stable item in
a confusion, 219
F/N session end but pc's TA up at Examiner, reasons
blowing by inspection, 81, 388
for, 124 bulk of the charge on the time track lies
in engrams,
F/N VGIs at session end but low TA at exam, rea- 29
sons for, 126 "can't run engrams" is usually a
drug case, 155
foggy pc at session end, 3 chains; see chains
getting the end of session erasure, 131 contains pain
and unconsciousness, 69
getting the F/N to Examiner, 124 definition, 59, 410
Havingness Process and, 439 dub-in engram due to drugs,
176
never tell pc he will have another session in session, 39
duration; see duration
pc ends sessions with Bls, handling, 166 ending off a
chain or engram at the first sight of an
pc goes immediately to Examiner, 451 F/N, 131
pc who gets sad at session end in Dianetics, handling,
engram matching PT dangers, handling, 181
101 engram running; see engram running
procedure in model session, 451 feeling too solid to pc,
handling, 179
Routine 3RA and, 389 Group Engram Process, 114
VGIs F/N cog at session end, but sour grapes at group
engram, why it has force, 114
Examiner, 101 hanging up as physical injury,
reason, 219
end phenomena, high TA and, 71, 124
allowing pc to get all the charge and postulates out
high TA from a lot of engrams keying in, 124
of basic, 344 incident; see incident
auditor must be able to relate all the EP of a process
lot of engrams keying in, handling, 124
to an F/N in clay, 42 mushing engrams by pulling
W/Hs, 139
calling F/Ns in Dianetics, 388 mushing engrams with
Prepcheck, 143
cognition interrrupted in Dianetics, handling, 139 overt
engrams, running of, 396
Dianetic auditing EP is a well and happy pc, 360
postulate and basic hold the chain in place, 80
Dianetic chain EP, 62, 66, 125, 262, 332, 344, 384,
postulates and, 332
388, 391, 403, 451, 480 Prepchecking mushes
engrams, 469
Dianetic EP, how to get it, 343 slow recovery after
engram has been run, reason
Dianetics Prepared Assessment Rundown EP, 363
for, 219
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive EP, 399 study and,
110
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
engram(s) (cont.) engram running (cont.)
takes more than one chain of engrams to build up an
late things hang up where earlier like things exist, 428
ill area, 92 locating items to run, 396
three-wav or quad engrams on drugs, 176 mission of,
29
unflat or restimulated engram chains and high TA, moving
pc through the incident with each run through
124 vs, scanning, 343
what happens on the E-Meter when you restimulate
narrative running; see narrative running
an, 71 no rote commands that cover all cases can
exist, 26
why engrams are run, 29 not allowing pc to fully view
basic, effect of, 344
engram running; see also chains, Routine 3RA one always runs
whatever is offered, 60
acknowledge what the pc says and tell him to con- Original
Assessment Sheet, handling of, 155
tinue, 381 past life remedies, 232
acutely ill pcs and, 56 pc only restimulating masses
because he doesn't
"all auditors talk too much," 380 understand R3RA,
433
anaten or dope-off occurring, handling, 433 pc running an
item that was different than the one
ARC break in engram running sessions, prime source
assessed, handling, 139
of, 25 pc said something was erased just because
he was tired
ARC processes move the case up to engram running, of
running it, handling, 137
28 pc says it's gone but no full EP, 78
aspirin and other pain depressants, how they affect
pc's not-is of the picture squeezing it into invisibility,
auditing, 104 130
assessment and how to get the item, 350 pc stopped
running an incident that was erasing,
assessment steps, 350 handling, 137
auditing out sessions, 79, 364 pc was prevented from
running an incident, hand
auditor being doubtful of control in, 381 ling,
138
auditor demanded more than pc could see, handling, Pictures
and Masses Remedy, 433
138 prevented by failure to clear commands and
proce
being less willing to reach and duplicate events of the
dures of R3RA, 433
past, reason, 439 procedure step by step for
R3RA, 382, 390
bouncers, handling of, 343 program outline in full for
NED, 360
by chains, 25 reason it is necessary, 30
cancelled issues, list of, 436 reasons for releasing
charge from a case, 29
"can't run engrams" is usually a drug case, 155 reasons
why some cannot run engrams on pcs, 25
changes in methods, reason for, 380 references, 380
command (asking for the postulate), 343 repairing a
chain or engram, 135
commands for moving a time track about, 26 returning pc
to the incident, 343
commands in full for R3RA, 382, 390 roller-coaster on
NED, handling, 83
Dianetic Clear must not be run on engrams, 117 rote
chant vs, understanding procedure, 81
distracted while running an incident, handling, 139
rule of first time, understanding the, 81
drugs unhandled prevents a pc from running en- running
later incidents vs, running basic, 28
grams, 433 same or similar item has been run in the
past, hand earlier ARC break on engrams was restimulated,
ling, 143
handling, 138 same thing run twice, handling, 138
earlier beginning; see earlier beginning scan through
to the end of the incident is incorrect,
earlier incident; see earlier incident 343
earlier misrun incident was restimulated, handling,
State of Case Scale and, 27
137 stopped running an incident that was erasing,
hand
early engram running vs, R3RA, 381 ling, 137
EP of a Dianetic chain, 62, 66,125, 262, 332, 344, suddenly
running a single or triple pc on quad, effect
384, 388, 391, 403, 451, 480 of, 434
erasure; see erasure take the pc's data, never take his
orders, 381
errors: see errors there's no substitution for actually
understanding
example, 60 what's going on, 81
example of how a typical Dianetic chain might run,
there was no interest in running an item, handling,
416 137
example of how a typical narrative item might run,
three ways to move a time track about, 25
417 two or more incidents got confused, handling,
137
first thing to teach in, 26 two things that prevent pcs
from running engrams,
F/Ns, calling of, 61 433
F/N VGIs yet no cognition, handling, 343 use of the
word "through," 26
getting a pc to PT in, 26 volunteered running item,
handling, 351
getting the postulates in the basic incident, 343 what
happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
grinding: see grinding run on later items, 132
handling of time on pc's time track, 25 what happens
when only later than basic incidents
HCOB on, 25 are run, 28
high TA caused by chains left in restimulation, hand-
what happens when the basic on a chain is found and
ling, 433 erased, 29
high TA on basic, handling, 81 why engrams are run, 29
how charge is discharged, 29 why later than basic
incidents are run, 28
imaginary incidents remedy, 435 enturbulation, requiring pc to
stay in a hotel away from
it takes as long as it takes, 344 the area of
enturbulation, 128
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
environment(s)(al): see also present time erasure(s), erase(d),
erasing (cont.)
assist handling of ARC breaks with the, 218 occurs when
the postulate is obtained, 477
assist handling of out ruds with the, 218 overrun by
demanding earlier than there is, 474
auditing environment is auditor's responsibility, 196
overrun, effects and handling of, 480
engram matching PT dangers, handling, 181 overrunning
erased chains, 143
environmental menace and PTS, 50 pc doesn't know if it's
erasing or going more solid,
environmental menace, handling, 187 handling,
384, 392
Havingness Process purpose is to stabilize pc in his pc
said something was erased just because he was
environment, 440 tired of running it, handling,
137
"insane" pc is given a secure environment, 84 pc's not-
is of the picture squeezing it into invisibility,
people with out-ethics withholds see a false environ-
130
ment, 208 pc stopped running an incident that was
erasing,
PTS and environmental continual overt, 50
handling, 137
repairing or isolating pc so his PT isn't so ferocious pc
who erases before he can tell about it, 81
looking, 125 postulate off equals erasure, 384,
391, 480
requiring person to stay in a hotel away from the area
postulate usually comes off in the form of a cogni of enturbulation,
128 tion, 480
restoring ability to handle his environment, 462
procedure for getting erasure in R3RA, 131, 384,
safe solution adopted as a retreat from environmental
391, 480
restimulation, 456 pushing pc earlier after he
has given the postulate,
stabilizing pc in his environment~ 440 effects of,
480
Sweat Program making one more causative in, 326 reasons
chains do not erase, 100
the lower the tone the less willing he is to reach, com-
recognizing when you hear a postulate, 480
municate with and experience his PT environment,
release the postulate and the chain blows, 62
439 stopped running an incident that was erasing,
hand
EP: see end phenomena ling, 137
equipment, why Man does not have really workable unburdening
and, 80
equipment, 380 unerased flow preventing others from
erasing, 452
erasure(s), erase~d), erasing: see also as-is: blowing what
happens when the basic on a chain is found and
asking "Did it erase?", 81 erased, 29
asking "Has it erased?", 101, 384, 391, 403 what you're
erasing, 474
asking pc to look for an erased chain, effects of, 141
when it occurs, 59
assuming one always asks "solid or erasing," 80 when pc
said it was erased it still had a mass, hand auditing pc under
protest causes no erasure, 131 ling, 140
basic facts concerning, 80 error(s), flub(s), goof(s),
mistake(s),
believing things don't erase, reason for, 196, 480
additives, 100
blowing an engram by inspection, 81, 388 asking pc
what the auditor did, 94, 100, 102, 144, 147
clue to erasure, 80, 400, 477 "assess existing lists or
add" and NED auditor says
definition, 59, 410 no items, handling, 102
demonstration of "erasing," 406 auditing a pc under
protest, 131
depends on pc getting to the beginning of the inci-
auditing errors, what they consist of, 14
dent, 78 auditor comm lag, 100
drilling checking for erasure, 88 bad auditing goofs,
handling the student who makes,
drugs inhibit erasure, 105 74
effect of ending off before pc has given postulate, 71
bad auditing, remedy of, 14
effect of running several somatic chains without eras-
basic Dianetic errors, the, 59
ing any, 71 choosing a multiple item or an after
the fact item
EP of a Dianetic chain, 62, 66, 125, 262, 332, 344,
to run, 100
384, 388, 391, 403, 451, 480 commonest C/S for
pc after Dianetic session that
"erasures" at TA 4,0 with an "F/N," reason for, 105
ends with high or low TA and/or Bls at Examiner,
errors that add up to no erasure, 130 101
failing to ask for DEF again when pc says "It's cramming
errors, handling the basic ones, 345
erased" but TA high, 130 cramming for every flub
or bog, 144, 146, 342
flows that won't erase, handling, 452 demanding pc go
earlier than basic, 101
HCOB on, 78 Dianetic errors, examples, 76
he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase
Dianetic errors, list of the most frequent ones and
them, 133 how to handle, 135
high TA caused by being run in the past without full
Dianetic errors that cause high or low TA, 100
erasure, 124 Dianetic list errors, recognizing
and handling of, 192
how charge is discharged, 29 Dianetic pc audited over
out ruds, handling, 101
how not to erase, 80 Dianetic session failures, four main
reasons for, 100
instant F/N and BD items almost always erase very doing
odd things because auditor gets nervous, 86
easily, 130 doublefolderdanger, 115
late things hang up where earlier like things exist, 428
ending off a chain or engram at the first sight of an
narrative erasure, clue to, 400, 477 F/N, 131
not able to erase because pc does not understand erasure,
errors that prevent it, 130
R3RA, handling, 433 exam F/Ns after flubs, what it
means, 147
not asking for an earlier incident mentioning the same
failed sessions, reason for the majority of, 94
item causes no erasure, 130 failing to ask for DEF
again when pc says "It's
not asking for earlier beginning causing no erasure,
erased" but TA high, 130
131 failure to ask for earlier beginning, how the
C/S
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
error(s), flub(s), goof(s), mistake(s) (cont.) estimate, Tech
Estimator and, 331
spots it, 100 ethics: see also justice: penalties
failure to ask for earlier incident, how the C/S spots
below administrative Whys there is usually an ethics
it, 101 situation, 207
failure to call for earlier beginning when pc can find
breakdown in many orgs is a failure of executives to
no earlier incident, 100 wear their ethics
and 3ustice hats, 207
failure to call for earlier incident when there is one,
certifying a NED auditor who doesn't get provenly
100 excellent results is an act of treason,
109
flubbed commands, 100 Committee of Evidence: see Committee
of Evidence
flubs in TRs are the basis of all confusion in subse-
Court of Ethics: see Court of Ethics
quent efforts to audit, 157 declared SP for repeated
violations of study tech, 204
forced to go earlier below basic, how the C/S spots
definition, 209
it, 101 downstat area, handling, 207
forcing pc toward "earlier incident" when it required
executives and, 207
"earlier beginning" making pc jump chains, 108
getting in ethics and tech before you can get in ad forgetting
the commands during session, handling, 86 min, 292
four Dianetic errors that are detectable if C/S reads
jokers and degraders, handling of, 291
the worksheets, 100 most important zone of ethical
conduct in an org is
four errors that are beyond the view of the C/S, 100
at or near the top, 207
grinding, how the C/S spots it in the session, 100 offenses
that come under failure to uphold or set an
how to tell auditors who have their metering or basic
example of high ethical standards, 208
definitions madly out, 101 out-ethics see out-ethics
if L3RF doesn't resolve it, 101 out of valence and out-
ethics, 208
lack of speed in giving commands, 100 penalty for
executive failure to keep ethics in on him list errors: see out
lists self and those below him, 208
list of the most frequent Dianetic errors and how to
penalty for failure to employ study tech, 203
handle, 135 penalty for going by MUs in
despatches and telexes,
major NED errors, 108 221
making pc jump into another chain, 100 penalty for
neglecting to clarify words not understood,
misassessment in Dianetics, 100, 108 203
misassessment in Dianetics, spGtting it, 101 person in
treason on Ist dynamic is out of valence, 97
mistakes and suppression, 219 R/Ses, High Crime not to
mark them down and
misusing command sequence or procedure, handling,
report them, 229
86 R/Ses reported to Ethics, 240
most common errors being made by student auditors, study
tech and, 203
86 Study Tech and Post PL, penalties for violation
of, 221
most common goofs made by auditors, 37 Word Clearers,
ethics penalty for, 335
narratives being run through once or twice and aban-
Word Clearing and, 264
doned, 130 Ethics, Correct Danger Condition Handling, use
of, 251
NED auditor goofing and does not correct with ordi-
evaluate, can't evaluate, handling, 251
nary cramming, handling, 492 evaluation,
nine things that can go wrong in a NED session, 100 by
telling pc what the word or command means, 442
non-standard NED session requires pc be sent to a calling
prepared lists as statements tends to evaluate
Scientology auditor, 83 for pc, 345
out ruds pc on Dianetics, 100 Course Supervisor and, 74
out TRs, 100, 108 making assessment questions into
statements of fact
prepared lists include anything that could happen to
is a cousin to, 430
a pc or student, 248 pc looking or feeling
continually tired and, 41
reasons Dianetic session does not complete with reason
you don't tell the patient what caused it, 56
VGIs, 100 evaluators, handling slow evaluators, 251
rebound heavily on injured or ill people, 220 evil,
psychosis begins with a belief something is evil, 313
retrain, errors that require a, 100 evil intention, evil
purpose,
Routine 2-12 and 2-10 case errors, 14 below all psychotic
conduct lies an, 313
running a narrative item by regular R3RA instead of
criminal and, 240
by Narrative R3RA, 100 "Got to secretly do
everybody in," 226
running pc who has exteriorized in auditing on some- he
himself is generating it, 461
thing other than Int RD, 130 insanity and, 240
starting a new session with a new item with the TA is
expressed by committing harmful acts and with
way way up, 130 holding them, 314
student who goofs is being complex, 81 is his safe
solution to life, 462
taking an item in which pc has no interest, 100 not
getting down to the basic evil purposes in Ex Dn,
taking an item that doesn't read in R3RA, 100
reason for, 349
taking narrative items and running them as somatic R/S and,
11, 231, 240, 241, 454, 461
chains, 108 R/Sers and, 240
trying to run an item that didn't read, 130 R/Ses and
intended harm, 242
VGIs F/N cog at session end, but sour grapes at service
fac is a brother to, 461
Examiner, 101 terminals and, 461
why Routine 2 errors are more deadly than purely
examination(s),
auditing errors, 23 failed examinations,
discussion of, 32
E/S: see earlier similar HCO PL on, 32
Establishment Officer Series No, 5, use of, 251 line for any
complaint student may have concerning,
32
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
examination(s) (cont.) Expanded Dianetics (cont.)
medical examination; see medical examination jokers and
degraders, handling of, 291
passing grade will be 85% to get on interneships, 329
key to, 349
retread course if no passing grade is obtained, 329
NED is a requisite for, 441
students are not to discuss examinations, 32 NED is not
mixed with, 441
Examiner, not getting down to the basic evil purposes, reason
asking pc what the auditor did, 147 for, 349
definition, 412, 426 overhaul on, 279
F/N session end but pc's TA up at Examiner, reasons
pcs who R/S are given, 231
for, 124 points on the Grade Chart where it can be
run, 225
F/N VGIs at session end but low TA at exam, reasons
241, 279, 303
for, 126 Power Processing and, 303
getting an F/N at the Examiner, 131 product of the
course, 279
getting the F/N to Examiner, 124 programming of, 305
immediately after end of session pc goes to, 451 PTS
handling is not restricted to, 275
low TA at exam, 126 PTS handling vs,, 305
mandatory to take pc to Examiner after Touch and
requisites, 225
Contact Assists, 129 R/Ses and, 241
pc wound up at Examiner caved in, handling, 171 R/Ses,
handling of, 241
R-Factor to give pc on the, 407, 421 running off locks
instead of evil purposes, 349
R/S at Examiner, handling, 172 Sec Checking vs, 305
see Examiner to make statements regarding case, 421
set-ups checklist for, 225
TA high or low in session but F/N at Exams, what tech
correction round-up data concerning, 279
it means, 147 using small bits of Ex Dn mixed up
with other RDs,
VGIs F/N cog at session end, but sour grapes at
294
Examiner, 101 Vital Info RD is not restricled to,
275
Exam (Examiner) Report (Form), what it consists of~ 279
at variance with session reports, reason, 255 what it
handles, 312
exam F/Ns after flubs, what it means, 147 when an
auditor is trained on, 279
forging of, 254 when it is used, 228
from sick pc not getting into folder before C/Sing why the
auditor must be very knowledgeable on these
it, handling, 128 materials, 312
tight shoes causing high TA exam, 197 Expanded GF 40 RB: see
Green Form 40
Ex Dn; see Expanded Dianetics Expanded Grades; see also grades
executive(s), definition, 116
breakdown in many orgs is a failure of executives to
mini list of Grade 0-lV processes, 471
wear their ethics and justice hats, 207 not a
prerequisite for Power, 226, 303, 307
correction of, 251 programming of, 226, 228
definition, 207 program to recover full use and results
of, 116
duty to investigate downstat areas, 207 Quad vs,
Expanded Grades, 226
ethics and, 207 tech correction round-up and, 286
penalty for failure to uphold or set an example of when
they can be run, 303, 307
high ethical standards, 208 expelled for repeated study
tech violations, 204
penalty for neglecting to clarify words not understood,
experiential track of R/Ser, 230
203 expertise, C/S, 148
responsibility to see that persons in his area get their
exterior, exteriorize(s), exteriorization; see also interior
personal ethics in, 207 ization; Interiorization
Rundown
steps for getting in ethics on a staff member, 209 audited
past exterior, handling, 103
whose personal ethics are out, handling, 207 auditing past
exterior, effects of, 103
working too hard, handling by looking for the joker,
bypassed exteriorization, handling, 177
292 bypassed in this or former session, handling,
179
Executive Correction List, 251 case doesn't exteriorize at a
level it should, handling,
exercise, 178
preventing muscle soreness, 340 Date/Locate the point of
exteriorization, 177
Sweat Program and, 325 Dianetics rarely exteriorizes a pc,
68
exhausted pc and M/W/Hs, 3 drugs often make it impossible to,
453
Expanded Dianetics, effect of running pc who has exteriorized
in auditing
auditing the case at cause, 305 on something other
than Int RD, 130
behavior improved with, 242 exterior pc moving into the
body sending the TA up,
case histories giving the impression that one doesn't
198
complete Ex Dn cases, 294, 312 headaches caused by
Int problems, 249
cases must be completed, 294 high TA from auditing
past exterior, 103, 130, 132
Confessionals and, 279 pc went exterior (in Dianetics),
handling, 140
consequence of not handling Ex Dn fully once begun,
theta bop and, 238
305 eyes, confronting with one's eyes, handling, 158
definition, 239
description of the extent of, 279
DMSMH and, 312 F
effect incomplete or misdone Objectives, DRD, Sweat
Program or Dianetics has on, 349 facsimile; see picture
foreword of Ex Dn Course, 312 failure(s),
full extent and skill of an Ex Dn auditor, 279 auditor
or auditing failures, reasons for, 94
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
failure(s) (cont.) false TA (cont.)
no auditing as the most basic failure of cases, 277
handlings per the False TA Checklist, 267
physical illness causing auditing failures, 94 hands;
see hands
reason for the bulk of "failed pcs" in an area, 109
having pc wipe his hands every few minutes to get
fall, longest fall or BD noted in Dianetic assessment, 355
the TA above 2,0, 201
false, definition, 209 high TA and, 125
false (auditing) report(s), holding cans so tight it caused pc's
hands to sweat,
asking pc what the auditor did, 144 265
calling an F/N in the wrong range and, 260 how it comes
about, 194
cancellation of certs for, 282 improperly trimmed meter
causing, 194
C/S getting sessions monitored, 144 is in the physical
universe not the pc's think or bank,
detection of, 254 266
effects of, 254 late at night pc's TA may be high, 197
false TA obscured by, 282 making a meter read falsely
low with hand cream, 201
F/N VGI session end but TA up at Examiner, 125 making
meter read falsely high with talcum powder,
HCOB on, 254 201
means of repairing pc are denied by, 254 mishandling
false TA by assessing with the meter
out tech covered up by, 254 instead of directly
checking the pc, 265
out tech spread about by, 254 not OK to call pc's
attention to his hands, TA, or
penalty for, 202, 255, 282 meter during session, 235
penalty for C/S permitting auditor to write incom- obscured
by false auditing reports, 282
prehensibly or omit data, 221 one-hand electrode
and, 48, 72 195, 282
person who would falsify an auditing report, 255 out of
range F/Ns, correct procedure for, 260, 281
retrain ordered due to, 144 over-repair due to, 266
revealed by D of P interview, 255 part of pc's hand (the
palm cup) not touching the
steps to handle, 209 can, 265
tech correction round-up data concerning, 282 pc gone
into despair over his TA, handling, 273
ways of falsifying an auditing report, 254 pcs who
falsify, 198
false motivator, 49 reasons for, 269
false overts, handling, 49 references, 262, 265, 267, 288, 290
false read(s), rings causing false R/S, 197
assessing with a statement's tone of voice causes, 430
rusty corroded cans falsify TA, 197
command to check for, 166, 170, 310, 449 Scientology
F/N and TA position, 260
handling, 310 slack grip and, 196
lots of False assertions by auditors, handling, 170
sweaty hands causing low TA, 195
repeating false read, 38 TA depends on normally moist
hands, 222
ruds and, 38, 46, 166, 170 tech correction round-up and,
281
Suppress and False used in ruds, 46, 166, 170 tight
clothes and, 266, 272
false TA, tight shoes and, 197, 266, 272
addition, 198 trim knob thrown off causing false TA,
199
addition 2, 199 vanishing creams, 222, 235
addition 3, 200 very small cans or too small cans and,
196
arthritic hands causing, 196 warming up the cans, 198
basics behind finding and remedying of, 266 wet hands,
cause of, 222
big can vs, small can TA readings, 195 wet hands, handling
of, 223
cans; see cans when to handle false TA, 260
check for dryness by feeling hands, 266 wrist straps,
use of, 271
checking the pc directly, 265 wrong can size, handling,
196
checking the pc's grip, 265 False TA Checklist,
checklist, 267 form, 267
chilled pc and, 198 is manually checked on the pc, 281
cold cans and, 198 mishandling false TA by assessing
with the meter, 265
cold pc has falsely high TA, 196 use of, 250, 281
conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA, famib,
223 family insanity, handling of, 156
crossed legs and, 265 trouble, handling with
Confessionals, 298
discharged meter and, 195 fast flow, Qual is not, 248
dry hands, causes of, 222 fat,
dry hands causing, 196, 222 circulation in, 325, 339
dry hands, recognizing and handling of, 222 LSD lodged
in, 339
earlier similar incident asked due to, 194 toxic
substances lodged in body fat, handling, 361
E-Meter and, 269 Fear of People List, use of, 250
examples, 194 fears, handling of, 156
exterior pc moving into the body sending the TA feeling,
up, 198 somatics and, 353
floating TA and, 197 unfeeling due to drugs, 105
F/N overrun due to false TA, example, 194 FES; see Folder
Error Summary
F/Ns and, 194 FESer(s); see also Folder Error Summary
F/Ns disregarded because of false TA, handling, checking
folder to find if pc has made earlier grades,
260,261 283
hand cream; see hand cream checklist for, 282
handling, 265 duty to indicate if pc made last grade
and is set up
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
FESer(s) (cont.) floating needle(s), F/N(s)(ed)(ing) (cont.)
for next grade, 283 F/N VGIs ratio stat, 317
how C/Ses depend on, 283 F/N VGIs yet no cognition (in
Dianetics), handling,
FFD; see Full Flow Dianetics 343
firefight, definition, 143 footplates obscure F/Ns and reads,
235
first aid, injured persons and, 151 getting an F/N at the
Examiner, 131
first dynamic, person in treason on first dynamic is out getting
the F/N to Examiner, 124
of valence, 97 good indicators and, 47, 48
First Dynamic Danger Formula, 211 hard to get F/Ns and resistive
case, 181
fish and fumble, 460 HCOB on, 48, 72
fixation, fixed idea(s), high TA and, 48, 177 223, 261
alcohol use and religious fixations, 175 high TAs and
low TAs do not widely F/N, 223
period of confusion is followed by, 219 ignore
Dianetic F/Ns until postulate has come off to
service fac and, 461 F/N and VGIs, 388
service fac, how it becomes fixed, 457 indicated too late
in Dianetics, handling, 135
Flag, indicated too soon in Dianetics, handling, 135
"L" series of RDs restricted to, 287 indicating F/Ns
(patter), 239
"NED for OTs" auditors and C/S must be trained
indicating the, 42, 72
at, 479 indicators and, 260, 261, 281
NED for OTs delivered at, 389, 478 instant F/N; see
instant F/N
fleeting F/N, definition, 223 it's the postulate-not the F/N
that we are going
flinching pc, 31 for in NED, 62
floating needle(s), F/N(s) (ed)(ing), key-out,and, 487
ARC break needle differentiated from, 47, 48, 261 low TA
F/Ns and false TA, 196
assists and, 150, 153 low TA F/Ns from pc holding cans so
tight it caused
auditing pc under protest causes no F/N, 131 his
hands to sweat, 265
auditor must be able to relate all the EP of a process
missed F/N due to false TA, example, 194
to an F/N in clay, 42 missed F/Ns, prevention of,
280
auditor stopped just because there was an F/N, hand-
missing F/Ns on pcs, effects of, 280, 281
ling (in Dianetics), 135 not writing in F/Ns, 36
auditor who called F/Ns regardless of TA position, occurs
just before pc is aware of it, 48, 72
201 one-hand electrode and, 48, 72, 93
bad indicators and "F/N," 47 out of range F/Ns,
correct procedure for, 260, 281
bypassed F/Ns, symptoms of and handling, 177 overran the
F/N due to false TA, example, 194
bypassing one makes pc uncomfortable, 239 overrun and
missed F/Ns, 280
calling "F/Ns" that were actually ARC break needles,
packed up F/N, handling, 178
260 pcs and pre-OTs often signal an F/N with a
"pop"
calling high or low TA F/Ns, 223 to the left, 48, 72
calling out of range F/Ns, 260, 281 pcs who falsify
F/Ns, 198
can occur five or more engrams before basic is
persistent F/N before original item is gone, hand
reached, 403 ling, 427
case has ceased to F/N, handling, 178 persistent F/Ns in
Dianetics, handling, 427
clearing commands and, 443 postulate vs, F/N in NED, 262
cognition and, 48, 72 Power F/Ns, 262, 403
command for rehabbing bypassed F/Ns, 178 precise
instant to tell the pc it's an F/N, 42
complaints by pc about F/Ns, handling, 169 pre-OTs and,
48, 72
definition, 48, 72, 409, 425, 429 prepchecking F/Ns, 169
demonstrating one on a meter with no pc or cord
propitiation and, 47
connected, 239 read, when F/N is a read, 338
Dianetic F/Ns, calling of, 262, 388, 403, 480
rehabbing an F/N, 48
Dianetic handling of, 61 R/S and, 48, 72
disregarded F/Ns, handling, 260, 261, 281 R/S
differentiated from, 238
disregarding actual F/Ns because the TA was not rud
doesn't F/N, reason, 445
between 2,0 and 3,0, 260 ruds, getting the F/N on,
445
don't call F/N until you've gotten the postulate, 384,
Scientology F/N and TA position, 260
391 sensitivity and, 280
effect of indicating ARC break needle as an, 261
sensitivity too high causing missed F/Ns, 265
ending off a chain or engram at the first sight of an
set up a case with F/N before undertaking major
F/N, 131 actions, 38
EP and, 48 TA climbs when F/N is overrun or missed, 48
exam F/Ns after flubs, 147 taking a road out by "getting
an F/N at will," 198
false TA and, 194 TA must be between 2 and 3 for a
correct F/N, 194
"fleeting F/N" defined, 223 tech correction round-up and,
280
floating TA and, 197 theta bop differentiated from, 239
flying a rud or ruds if no F/N, 445 thinking of
something else to get an F/N, 198
F/Ning student, 149 was not indicated at all in
Dianetics, handling, 136
F/Ning too quickly to be processed well is symptom when to
cut a pc's comm with regard to an F/N, 42
of heavily charged case, 97 why pcs don't come back
into session with an F/N, 42
F/N session end but pc's TA up at Examiner, rea- wide
F/Ns which hit the pin, handling, 280
son for, 124 wide persistent F/N with high or low
TA, what it
F/N VGIs at session end but low TA at exam, rea-
means, 223
sons for, 126 wrong can size causing 3,2 F/Ns, 196
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
floating TA, description, 197 footplate(s),
flour, Sweat Program and, 339 do not read on the meter, 198
flow(s), don't read on the bank, 288
bypassed flows can cause high TA, heavy pressure F/Ns and
reads obscured by, 235
and illness, 132 use cancelled, 198, 235
definition, 411, 426 use forbidden, 288
earlier unrun flows restimulated by those flows used force,
significance and, 487
in later actions causing high TA, 132 forcing the pc,
getting in all flows, 133 don't force the pc, 60, 388
jumped flows in Dianetics, handling, 136 forced to go
earlier below basic, how the C/S spots
missing flows, running of, 133 it, 101
"rehab or run Fl, F2, F3, F0 if they read" when forcing
the pc earlier than basic, 80
getting in all flows, 133 foreign language case,
dictionaries and, 442
running flows that won't erase, 452 forgetful, drugs render
thetan forgetful, 105
unerased flow preventing others from erasing, 452 former
therapy; see also practices
what happens if any later grade is run with more former
practices, handling of (on Original Assess
flows than was used in earlier actions, 132 ment
Sheet), 156
what happens if Dianetics was run single and grades
handling, 181
are run triple, 132 three-way or quad recall and
engrams on, 182
what happens when a flow not run on earlier items Four (IV)
Rundown; see OT IV Rundown
is run on later items, 132 fourth dynamic, Man's tendency
toward 4th dynamic
Flow 0, suicide, where it stems from, 312
commands for R3RA, 385, 393 fruits, Sweat Program and, 325
missing flows, running of, 133 FS; see Folder Summary
running Zero flows, 134 Full Assist Checklist For Injury and
Illness, 250
suddenly running a single or triple pc on quad, effect Full
Flow Dianetics,
of, 434 introducing FFD, 144
Flow 2, commands for R3RA, 385, 392 overrun, how you know it
is occurring, 142
Flow 3, commands for R3RA, 385, 393
flubs; see errors
flunks, 37 G
F/N; see floating needle
folder(s),
case folder analysis, NED, 100 gain; see case gain
color flash for "NED for OTs" folders, 479 gamblers, handling
of, 304
C/Sing or auditing without folder study, 202 games condition(s),
C/S only with all folders to hand, 115 R/Ses and, 11
double folder danger, 115 withholds and, 297
fat folder and out of valence, 97 GF; see Green Form
FESer's duty to indicate if pc made last grade and GF 40; see
Green Form 40
is set up for next grade, 283 glasses, checking the
auditor's glasses out, 495
incomplete auditing folders, 282 goal(s),
loss of pc's folders = Committee of Evidence, 257
definition of "a goal which is an overt against Scien lost folders,
282 tology," 8
lost old folder musn't halt auditing, 115 goal lines of
well and happy human beings and a
omissions in, 256, 282 well and happy society, 85
penalty for failure to make and include worksheets
invalidating or suppressing a right goal, 31
in the, 257 right goals handled wrong hurt and
make pc flinch,
Preclear Checklist kept in the front of, 365 32
preservation of, 256 goals problem mass(es),
R/Ses, importance of being able to locate them in pain of
a suppressed or invalidated GPM, 32
the folder, 242 partial anatomy of, 13
R/Ses, noting of, 238, 240 pc flinch and, 32
Sec Check actions must all be included in the, 256
terminals and, 10
situation where one can't get a folder from another good,
org or field auditor, 115 Man is basically good,
313
thick review folder and resistive case, 181 there is so
much bad in the best of us and so much
unavailable folder and Quad Dianetics, 133 good in
the worst of us, 478
Why Finding worksheets must be included in the, 256 good
indicator(s), very good indicator(s),
Word Clearing worksheets not getting in the, 256 Dianetic
chain EP and VGIs, 403
Folder Archives l/C, 256 F/N and, 47, 48
Folder Error Summary; see also FESer ignore Dianetic F/Ns
until postulate has come off
penalty for acting on a case without an FES done, 202
to F/N and VGIs, 388
which fails to note if flubbed chains were repaired,
reasons Dianetic session does not complete with
142 VGIs, 100
Folder Pages are regarded too lightly, 256 goofs; see errors
Folder Summary, grade(s); see also levels
Original Assessment Sheet, noting it was done, 367
assessing a pc to higher levels to solve lower ones, 148
penalty for acting on a case without an up-to-date assists
in the midst of grade auditing, 219
FS, 202 audited with prior grades out, handling,
185
food, metabolism test to check that pc has had enough
definition of Expanded Lower Grades, 116
to eat, 382 Dianetic Clears can be run on Grades
0-lV, 117
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
grade(s) (cont.) Green Form (cont.)
don't handle ill pc by giving him new higher grades, is
done by handling every read, 38
60 lists or overlists showing up, handling, 146
Expanded Grades: see Expanded Grades Method 3 and, 166
FESer's duty to indicate if pc made last grades and
Method 5 and, 173
is set up for next grade, 283 Misunderstood Case
Condition reads, handling, 167
full list of grades showing where the various RDs now
NED pcs, when to give a GF, 83
offered fit, 227 not handling Green Form reads as
they occur, 36
Havingness Processes for, 471 not handling reading GF
items as they occur, 37
hold the form of grades and processes, 305 not used to
handle high or low TA, 250
injury or illness in the midst of grade auditing, 219
out rud type pc handled with, 250
it;s the grade processes and OT levels that improve
roller-coaster on NED, handling with GF, 83
cases, 38 seriously physically ill, handling, 95
lower grades harmonic into the OT levels, 116 symptoms
that indicate need of, 166
major grade process may not be enough to make a too many
GF, Remedy Bs and S & Ds, handling, 168
pc make a lower grade, 121 uses of, 102, 166, 250
mini list of Grade 0-lV processes, 471 use when pc gets
ill after auditing but the sessions
never run a Scientology grade to make a pc well, 67
look alright, 102
new grades without having completed earlier grades, Green
Form 40,
reason for and handling of, 282 area of interest
that hasn't read in Dianetics, hand out grades on OT IIIs, 120
ling, 103
pc can always be solved in or below where he is, 148 C
type case and, 83
pc hangs up in doing grades due to drugs, 176 handling
of GF 40 items, 95
pc should be on the next grade, 38 handling NED roller-
coaster with, 83
penalty for not working for a product of a fully com-
"overwhelmed" added to, 119
pleted pc on that grade, 202 purpose of the
Resistive Case Rundown (GF 40), 119
pretending training or grades not attained, handling,
seriously physically ill, handling, 95
181 use of, 119, 250
Quad Grades restored, 307 when to use a GF 40, 119
Quad vs, Expanded Grades, 226 Green Green Form, use of, 252
Quickie Grades; see Quickie Grades grief,
Single Grades never should have been abandoned, 307
LX1 assessed to grief or loss, 184
what happens if any later grade is run with more pc
ceases to mock up, through grief, 47
flows than is used in earlier actions, 132 pc in
grief after too much overcorrection and errors,
what happens if Dianetics was run single and grades
handling, 168
are run triple, 132 grinding,
Grade Chart; see Classification Gradation and Aware- caused
by not asking for an earlier incident men
ness Chart tioning the same item, 130
Grade 0, definition, 400
pc run on Grade Zero but won't attest, handling, 119
definition of "grinding out" an incident, 28
references, 471 earlier incident vs, earlier beginning,
474
Grade I, failure to call for earlier beginning when pc
can find
if a Grade II or above has a problem, Grade I is no
earlier incident, 100
out, 120 how not to erase, 80
references, 471 how the C/S spots failure to ask for
earlier incident,
Grade II, 101
Confessional materials added to, 293 how the C/S spots
grinding in the session, 100
Grade I is out if a Grade 11 or above has a problem, if
it had lots of DEFs and ground to a high TA, 85
120 narrative running and, 386, 400, 477
orgs specializing in Grade 11, especially on staff, 227
not telling the pc to go earlier when he should, 80
psychotics handled with Grade 11 Expanded, 314 only
going E/S in narrative running if it starts to
references, 472 grind very badly, 79, 130, 344, 354,
386
Grade 111, references, 472 overrun of non-basic, 474
Grade IV, references, 472 groupls),
gradient, Sweat Program and, 324, 341 endurance of, what it
depends on, 209
graph; see OCA graph Group Engram Process, 114
Green Form, people whose ethics are low will upset a, 208
All Black reads, handling, 167 transgressions against
the mores of the, 297
ARC break long duration, handling with GF, 101 when a
group prospers, 209
area of interest that hasn't read in Dianetics, hand- group
engram, why it has force, 114
ling, 103 Group Engram Process,
audited over withholds, handling with GF, 102
important note on, 115
C type case and, 83 procedure, 114
Dianetic auditor does not have to know how to do, 76 Guardian
Office, illegal pcs and, 259
Dianetic pc audited over a PTP gets GF, 101
Dianetics and, 76
doing GF if no F/N on ruds, 166 H
handling each read as it's found, 38
high TA and, 38 habits, non-optimum personal existence and, 216
if L3RF doesn't resolve it use GF, 101 hand(s),
if not cleared on itsa get the basic on the chain, 38
arthritic hands, handling, 271
illness following auditing is handled by, 219
calloused hands, handling, 271
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
hand(s) (cont.) Havingness Process(es) (cont.)
check for dryness by feeling hands, 266 procedure,
440
dry and wet hands make false TA, 222 purpose of, 440
dry hands, causes of, 196, 222 references, 439
dry hands causing high TA, 196, 222 run 10 to 12
commands of, 440, 451
dry hands, recognizing and handling of, 222, 269, 271 HCOB;
see Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin
dry hands, test of, 196 HCO PL; see Hubbard Communications
Office Policy
having pc wipe his hands every few minutes to get
Letter
the TA above 2,0, 201 HC Out-Point-Plus-Point Lists RA,
use of, 251
keep the pc's hands in sight, 196 headache(s),
not OK to call pc's attention to his hands, TA, or
Dianetics and, 60
meter during session, 235 Int problems and, 249
part of pc's hand (the palm cup) not touching the migraine
headache, handling, 92
can, 265 pc again saying "I've still got a
headache," 91
pc not being told continually to wipe his hands, 270
what happens when only one chain is handled, 91
slack grip causing high TA, 196 where continual headaches
come from, 60
sweaty hands causing low TA, 199 why you don't run
"headaches," 69
sweaty hands, handling, 195 healing; see also curing
TA depends on normally moist hands, 222 accelerating
the rate of, 57
wet hands, cause of, 222 assist is not engaging in, 217
wet hands causing low TA, 222 assists, medical
treatment and, 216
wet hands, handling of, 223, 270 Dianetics allows a broken
limb to heal in two weeks
hand cream, instead of six, 65
anti-perspirants and, 223 illnesses that were against
the law to cure, 64
applied once per session, 271 monopolies and, 64
being used to wrongly lower the TA, 199 rate of
healing and Dianetics, 57, 65
dry and wet hands make false TA, 222 restoration of
awareness is often necessary before
dry hands, recognizing and handling, 222, 269,271
healing can occur, 55
drying up, 266 spiritual and structural or physical side
of, 217
formula for a 90% effective hand cream, 235 spiritual
healing of the body has not been illegal, 64
how to apply it, 269, 271, 272 Touch Assist and, 55
Locorten, 235 Health Form; see also Original Assessment Sheet
low TA caused by too much and too greasy hand do not
begin Dianetics with a, 155
cream, 222 reissued as Original Assessment Sheet,
350
making a meter read falsely low with, 201 heat,
misapplying of, 265 pain and, 10
vanishing creams don't work, 222 pc too hot, handling, 272
Vaseline Intensive Care, 222, 235, 265, 271 help, auditors
"feeling they cannot help the pc," 213
use of, 222 HGC; see Hubbard Guidance Center
handwriting, cramming on, 497 HGC Pc Application Form, 330
happiness, happy, High Crime,
attainment of, 208 interneships and High Crime
checkouts, 328
detecting the things that have to be handled to make
NED High Crime, 473
a pc well and happy, 350 to not mark R/Ses
down and report them, 229
honesty and, 208 high TA,
service fac destroys freedom of choice to be happy,
answers to any high TA that won't come down, 125
458 ARC breaks, never try to get TA down from above
well and happy pc (being), Dianetics and,85,350
3.0 on ARC breaks, 147
353, 360, 389, 441 arthritic hands causing, 196
well and happy society, 85 assists and, 219
Hard TRs Course; see TRs Course auditing past exterior and,
103, 130, 132
harm, R/Ses and, 242 auditing too late at night and, 124, 197,
272
Nave You Lived Before This Life?, 321 basic engram but high TA,
handling, 81
havingness, between sessions, TA rising, 38
definitions, 439 break taken and TA went up when session
resumed,
how and when to remedy it, 439 handling, 180
is proportional to pc's ability to confront in the ses-
bypassed flows causing, 132
sion, 23 bypassed F/Ns and, 177
low or "no havingness," remedy of, 439 calling high or low
TA F/Ns, 223
M/W/Hs and dropped havingness, 3 cans too big or too small
and, 199
pain is a sort of, 453 caused by being run in the past
without erasure of
reduced by rough auditing, 23 engrams, 124
Havingness Process)es), chains left in restimulation causing
high TA, hand
ARC Straightwire Havingness, 471 ling, 433
assists, reason for running Havingness in, 219 chilled
pc and, 198
can squeeze; see can squeeze chopped comm and, 124
finding and running the, 439 chronic high TA (3,5 or
above), handling, 168
Grade 0-IV Havingness Processes, 471 cold cans and, 198
is never run to obscure failure to F/N the main pro-
cold pc causing, 196
cess, 451 commonest C/S for pc after Dianetic
session that
Model Session and, 451 ends with high or low TA
and/or Bls at Examiner,
Objective Havingness Processes, defined, 439 101
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
high TA (cont.) high TA (cont.)
commonest sources of, 199 unflat or restimulated engram
chains and, 124
Dianetic errors that cause high or low TA, 100
unreading item or subject run causing, 124
Dianetic handling of, 71 vanishing cream causing, 235
Dianetics, what high TA means in, 71 what all high TAs
depend on, 124
discharged meter and, 223 why TAs go high on overrun,
124
disregarded F/Ns and, 261 wide persistent F/N with TA
high, what it means, 223
don't rehab on a high TA at session start, 38 Word
Clearing and, 251
drug background and, 132 Hi-Lo TA Assessment,
drugs and, t05, 129, 175 self-auditing is shown up by,
128
dry hands causing, 196, 222 shows up another auditor
unknown to the C/S, 129
earlier unrun flows restimulated by those flows used
use of, 249
in later actions causing high TA, 132 "Hold it still,"
153, 434
engram in restimulation causing, 71 honest(y); see also
dishonesty
engrams keying in and, 124 good auditors do honest
worksheets and honest audit
EP not reached resulting in, 124 ing, 199
"erasures" at TA 4,0 with an "F/N," reason for, 105
happiness and, 208
exterior pc moving into the body sending the TA up,
having decent, honest or capable beings, 29
198 is the best policy, 201
failing to ask for DEF again when pc says "It's is the
road to truth, 255
erased" but TA high, 130 results of auditor
determined by, 200
false auditing report and F/N VGI session end but road to
truth is begun with honesty, 214
TA up at Examiner, 125 hot, see heat
false TA and, 125 hours,
F/Ns and, 48, 177, 223, 261 auditors not getting out their
hours, handling, 205
F/N session end but pc's TA up at Examiner, reasons
falling hours, major Why of, 213
for, 124 WDAHs is the second D of P stat, 214
Green Form being used to handle, 38 Hubbard Communications
Office Bulletin(s),
handling, 199 being suspicious of HCOBs and PLs not
written by
HCOB on, 71 LRH, 274
illness and, 126 forbidden to write one and sign LRH's
name, 274
inoperable meter and, 125 no BTB may cancel an HCOB, 274
Int problems causing~ 249 Technical Bulletins of
Dianetics and Scientology,
lists badly done as a cause of, 124 The, 237
making meter read falsely high with talcum powder, verbal
tech is no substitute for HCOBs, 281
201 Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter(s),
mechanics of, 71 forbidden to write one and sign LRH's
name, 274
misassessment in Dianetics and, 101 PLs not written by
LRH, 274
misauditing as a cause of, 124 Hubbard Guidance Center,
one-hand electrode and, 195, 282 HGC Pc Application Form,
330
out Int RD and, 199 interneships required before
auditing in, 247
overrun and, 48, 71, 124, 132, 142 line stops and line
tangles, major Why of, 213
overts and, 199 Hubbard, L, Ron,
overwhelmed and, 124 forbidden to write an HCOB or HCO PL
and sign
part of pc's hand (the palm cup) not touching the
LRH's name to it, 274
can causing higher TA, 265 having to recover lost
tech, 380
pcs with high TA feel ill and get ill, 126 HCOBs and PLs
not written by, 274
Pictures and Masses Remedy to handle, 125, 433 I am
responsible for the technology, 2
protest and, 131, 147, 199 you can audit just as well as
I can with practice and
Quad Dianetics and, 133 study, 15
reasons for, 124 Hubbard New Era Dianetics Graduate required to
C/S
relapsing onto drugs and, 129 NED, 82
restimulation and, 71 Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course, tech
correction
Routine 3RA and high or low TA, handling, 433
round-up and, 277
ruds and, 449, 450 buman; see Man
ruds being used to handle, 38 humor, jokers and degraders
and, 291
ruds, TA going high on ruds, handling, 167 hungg,
running incident late on the chain without going checking
to be sure pc has eaten and is not hungry,
earlier causing, 104 323
Scientology, what high TA means in, 71 pc hungry,
handling, 272
slack grip causing, 196 hypnotics, 104
starting a new Dianetic session with a new item with
the TA way way up, 130
start of session and, 38, 130, 449, 450
I
TA climbs when F/N is overrun or missed, 48
TA high or low in session but F/N at exams, what
it means, 147 "I," thetan is the, 408
three principal sources of, 132 id, 60
tight shoes causing high TA exam, 197 idea, substituting an
idea for a thetan, 457
tired pc and, 124 Identity Rundown,
too much talcum powder or drier causing, 222 EP, 357
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Identity Rundown (cont.) illness (cont.)
out of valence handled by, 152 pc who is ill is easily
made an effect, 95
procedure, 357 pc with severe injury or illness should
be run on all
programming of, 364 three types of assists, 150
what it handles, 364 physically ill pcs, handling, 95,
102, 181
illegal pc(s), physically sick persons, two classes of, 56
acceptance of, 259 predisposition, precipitation and
prolongation, 216
High Crime to accept, 286 psychic trauma erased speeds
recovery, 354
money returned to, 331 psychosomatic illness; see
psychosomatic illness
illness; see also accidents; assists; injury PTS and, 208
acutely ill defined, 56 purely physical facts of, 216
acutely ill pc, handling, 56 seriously physically ill,
handling, 95, 181
acutely ill pcs and engram running, 56 sick pc who should
have another C/S entirely, 128
after L&N session or up to 3 days after, handling, 309
something which continually hurts or disables may be
auditing a pc while ill, 37 structural or physical,
91
auditing failures due to serious and current physical
symptoms and handling of, 187
illness, 94 symptoms of mental derangement often
accompany
auditing followed by illness, handling, 219 illness,
57
auditing past exterior causing, 103 takes more than one
chain of engrams to build up an
bypassed flows causing, 132 ill area, 92
cannot claim anyone audited on NED will become
temporary illness, handling, 92
cured of, 358 terminally (fatally) ill pcs, 259
can't get rid of an illness by auditing one chain to
three things to do when pc becomes ill, 102
basic, 91 very sick pcs, handling, 84
C case in NED and, 83 well and happy pc is Dianetic
auditing EP, 360
chronically ill defined, 56 what underlies it, 83
chronic illness, handling of, 65 why a civilization would
make it illegal to cure ill chronic somatic; see chronic somatic
ness, 64
Clears and OTs, handling of, 91 why the sick and insane
do not respond to processing,
composite somatic, 92 50
continual or recurring illness, handling, 92 wrong item
causing sickness, 114
continual worrisome illness, handling, 92 Imaginatry cause,
definition, 49
Dianetics and, 67, 91 imaginat~ incidents, running of, 232, 435
don't handle ill pc by giving him new higher grades, immortal
being, Scientology results in an, 68
60 impingement, W/Cing and, 263
errors in tech rebound heavily on injured or ill people,
implant(s),
220 degradation, entrapment and, 30
first action in handling an, 91 incident was really an
implant, handling (in Dia Full Assist Checklist For Injury and
Illness, 250 netics), i37
give the handling of the structural disease side of it
restimulated an implant in Dianetics, handling, 137
to the medical doctor, 93 incident(s); see also engram;
engram running; narra
handle the illness or disability the pc offers, 67
tive; Routine 3RA
handling of (on Original Assessment Sheet), 156 being
less willing to reach and duplicate events of the
HCOB on, 91 past, reason, 439
high TA and, 126, 132 bouncing off the incident, handling,
343
illegal pcs and, 259 definition, 410
illnesses that were against the law to cure, 64
distracted while running an incident (in Dianetics),
ill pc on NED, handling, 85 handling, 139
ill people are prone to want to leave, 65 duration; see
duration
"incurable" illnesses and auditing, 92 earlier incident;
see earlier incident
"insane" pc and, 84 earlier misrun incident was
restimulated, handling,
"insanity" and physical illness, 55 137
light, very exact in tech auditing is required on in-
earlier similar incident; see earlier similar
jured or ill people, 220 getting the postulates in
the basic incident, 343
listing, ill after listing, handling, 173, 249, 309
imaginary incidents remedy, 435
major action being done on a sick pc, how to prevent
imaginary incidents, running of, 232, 435
it, 128 left too heavily charged in Dianetics,
handling, 137
medical exam as an answer to pcs hiding general more
than one postulate in the basic incident, 344
illness, 128 moving pc through the incident with
each run through
medical examination and, 91, 95, 102, 128 vs,
scanning, 343
minister's role in handling spiritual ills, 220 no
duration was found for the incident, handling, 138
multiple illness defined, 62 not pc's incident,
handling (in Dianetics), 137
never run a Scientology grade to make a pc well, 67 pc
stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books,
out list and, 249 handling, 234
out ruds and physically ill pc, handling, 102 pc was
prevented from running an incident, hand
pc gets ill after auditing but sessions look alright,
ling, 138
handling, 102 premonition that the incident was
going to occur, 400
pc saying "it was getting more solid" to escape each
returning pc to the incident in engram running, 343
incident, jumped chains continually and became
scan through to the end of the incident is incorrect,
ill, 102 343
pcs with high TA feel ill and get ill, 126 skipped
incident in Dianetics, handling, 136
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
incldent(s) (cont.) in session (cont.)
stopped running an incident that was erasing, hand-
keep a pc in session, 2
ling, 137 definition, 198, 445
telepathic awareness that the incident was going to
M/W/H causing pc not to be in session, 448
occur, 400 picking up M/W/Hs keeps pcs in sessions,
2
the later he is in incidents and on the track the more
PTP vs,, 447
solid he is, 133 inspect(ed)(ion),
there was an ARC break in the incident (in Diane- ability
to inspect becoming less and less, reason, 457
tics), handling, 138 blowing engrams by, 81, 388
there was no date for an incident in Dianetics, hand-
returning his freedom to inspect, 468
ling, 138 service fac forbids inspection, 462
thetan is incident hungry, 132 stable datum adopted in
lieu of, 457
two or more incidents got confused, handling, 137 that
which is not confronted and inspected tends to
when an incident grows more solid, 474 persist, 457
incomplete actions; see actions instant F/N,
indicator(s); see also symptoms always handled first in
Dianetics, 355
ARC break long duration, manifestations of, 101 charge
and, 487
bad indicators; see bad indicators definition, 487
differentiating F/Ns from ARC break needles by instant
F/N and BD Dianetic items are the best, 130
indicators, 261 is a read, 487
F/Ns and, 260, 261, 281 recognition of, 487
good indicators; see good indicators running item and,
351
look at pc's indicators when calling F/Ns, 260 when it
is taken up, 487
out of range F/Ns and, 281 instant read(s),
references, 262 definition, 438
symptoms of pcs and how to handle, 163 valid R/Ses are not
always instant reads, 454
individuation, reason for and effects of, 297 Instant rock slam,
definition, 11
injury, injuries, injured; see also accidents; illness
institution(s), institutional,
burns; see burns extensive institutional history, 259
engrams hanging up as physical injury, reason, 219
institutional cases and jokers and degraders, 291
errors in tech rebound heavily on injured or ill peo-
institutional history and illegal pcs, 259
ple, 220 most people in institutions are probable
PTSes, 240
first aid rules apply to injured persons, 151 in-tech, the
only way to achieve it, 273
how prolongation of a chronic injury occurs, 55 Integrity
Processing; see also Confessionals; Security
"insanity" and, 55 Checking
light, very exact in tech auditing is required on in-
cancellation of HCOBs on, 295
jured or ill people, 220 Sec Checking,
Confessionals and, 278
pc with severe injury or illness should be run on all
tech correction round-up data concerning, 278
three types of assists, 150 intensive(s),
persisting despite a full assist, reason, 218
concluding intensives by cleaning up M/W/Hs, 4
predisposition, precipitation and prolongation, 216
definition of the completed intensives stat, 214
purely physical facts of, 216 major Why of 121/2 hour
intensives dropping out, 213
severe injury, handling, 188 Paid Comps and, 316
Injury Rundown, procedure, 153 intention, strongest intention in
the universe is the
innovation, art and, 319 intention to be right, 458
insane, insanib; see also psychosis; sanity interest,
evil intentions and, 240 auditor assessed by interest
only, not by read, hand family insanity, handling of, (on
Original Assessment ling, 76
Sheet), 156 check interest on narrative running
of the incident
general motive or purpose determines whether or in
assists, 218
not he is insane or sane, 313 command for
checking interest in an item, 351, 353
"insane," handling the, 65 Dianetics and pc interest, 67,
70
"insane" pc, handling, 84 longest read or pc's interest,
63
"insane" pc, main trouble with, 84 narrative running
and, 218, 354
is often the suppressed agony of physical illness and
protest vs, interest in R3RA, 388
injury, 55 Routine 3RA rules concerning, 388
medical illness and "insane" pc, 84 running items and,
351
physical illness and, 55 taking an item in which pc has
no interest, 100
PTS and, 240 there was no interest in running an item,
handling,
rest, a secure environment and any needful medical
137
treatment, 84 interiorization; see also exteriorization
symptoms of mental derangement often accompany
headaches caused by Int problems, 249
illness, 57 high TA and, 249
temporarily insane by reason of emotional shock,
Interiorization Rundown,
handling, 56 cautions, 143
two things which underlie it, 240 effect of running pc who
has exteriorized in auditing
what medical treatment of "insanity" requires, 55 on
something other than Int RD, 130
why the sick and insane do not respond to processing,
End of Endless Int Repair RD vs, Int RD Correction
50 List, 103
in session; see also out of session going flat to cog VVGIs
on an early flow, 249
auditor using freak control methods or processes to
high TA and out Int RD, 199
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Interiorization Rundown (cont.) item(s) (cont.)
is essentially a Dianetic action, 143 definition, 11
L3RE used when restim occurs, 143 Dianetic item; see
Dianetic item
L3RF form, 135 error of representing an R/Sing item, 18
messed up Int RD, handling, 103, 140 instant F/N is a
read, 487
reason it is done, 133 making a ring around the item found,
36
repair list, 135 method of testing for the character of
an, 12
theory of, 133 no BD F/N item found in L&N, handling,
308
what it does for the pc, 103 no item found in listing,
handling, 308, 309
when C/S orders it, 103 not giving pc his item, 37
which auditors can be trusted with, 143 noting reads
while pc is originating items, 438
Int Rundown Correction Llst, only do opposition lists on R/Sing
items, 18
End of Endless Int Repair RD vs,, 103 original item; see
original item
use of, 249 persistent item that doesn't blow,
handling, 175
interneship(s), persistent item that doesn't blow is usually a
wrong
being used to teach the course again, 328 item, 39
checkouts are done by the students themselves, 284
preassessment item; see preassessment item
checksheets being added to and added to, 285 read means
item is real to pc, 487
courses vs,, 328 running item; see running item
definition, 328 testing for the character of an item
whether term,
extended and unreasonable auditing requirements
oppterm or coterm, 12
and, 247 unreading item run causing high TA, 124
fast interneships, 328 unreading item run causing low TA,
126
graduate described, 328 unreading items being run,
handling, 124
HGC auditor must have done interneships for his wrong
item; see wrong item
class, 247 it takes as long as it takes, 344
High Crime checkouts and, 328
interminable interneships, 285
materials that must be added to certain checksheets,
J
293
Paid Comps and, 316
permanent certificate issued after interneship, 285 Jogging,
preventing too much theory on, 329 gradient for Sweat
Program, 341
product of an, 328 Sweat Program and, 325
provisional certificates and, 285 type of shoes to use, 340
purpose of, 328 Jokers and degraders, 291
interpretatlon, Interpretlng, Jumped chain(s),
Course Supervisor and, 74 by forcing pc toward "earlier
incident" when it re interpreting the tech, 275 quired
"earlier beginning," 108
study and, 74 F/N indicated too late as a cause of, 135
introverting shock causing self-auditing, 128 forced to go
earlier below basic causing, 101
invalidate(s), invalldating, Invalidation, handling, 136
auditors, invalidation of, 273 how pc gets onto an
entirely different chain, 480
by pushing pc earlier after he has given the postulate,
jumping chains by saying "it was getting more solid"
480 to escape each incident, 102
calling prepared lists as statements can invalidate
making pc jump into anothet chain, 100
pc, 345 overrun by demanding earlier than there
is, 474
checking for invalidated gains, 180 postulate bypassed
as a cause of, 136
example of auditor invalidating pc, 141 went past
basic and jumped chains, handling, 137
gains invalidated, symptoms and handling of, 180 when the
item isn't also mentioned in the command,
invalidative criticism and art, 320 130
item invalidated (in Dianetics), handling, 139 Justice; see
also ethics
low TA caused by, 196 breakdown in many orgs is a failure
of executives to
missed F/Ns and, 281 wear their ethics and justice
hats, 207
past lives, invalidation of, 233 definition, 209
pc attained some state and it was invalidated, hand-
when to use group justice procedures on a staff
ling, 140 member, 209
pc invalidated for getting overt or W/H off, hand
ling, 310
pc looking or feeling continually tired and, 41
K
R/S and, 241
R/S caused by, 172
"Since last session has anything been invalidated?", key-in;
see also restimulate
180 definition, 61, 424
invisible field, lot of engrams keying in, handling, 124
definition, 61 things that can cause a pc to key-in
chains, 124
handling (in Dianetics), 139 key-out; see also destimulate
state of case and, 27 definition, 61, 424
IQ raised by Dianetics, 66 F/N and, 487
item(s), instant F/N and, 487
abandoned item, 139 pc will destimulate in from 3 to 10
days, 71, 124
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Kleenex, 195, 322 list(s) (cont.)
know; see also not know high TA from lists badly done, 124
any sensory perceptive cut-off is an effort not to
incomplete lists and Routine 2, 19, 20
know, 298 instant F/Ns and, 488
cognition is totally dependent upon the freedom to length
of Routine 2 lists, 22
know, 298 not reading, handling, 309
Know To Mystery Scale, nulling a list, when to do it, 308
illustration, 1, 193 opposition lists, 17
use with Overt-Withhold Straightwire, I out lists;
see out lists
Know to Mystery Straightwire for extreme cases, I penalty for
failure to clear each word of every com
mand or list used, 204
L prepared list for correcting a
recently done list, 45
prepared lists; see prepared lists
questions, check for read on, 124
L&N; see listing and nulling reconstructing a, 308
latent read(s), two reading items on the list, handling, 309
definition, 438 verifying/correcting past L&Ns, 308
handling dirty needles and, 6 when to null a list in
Routine 2, 22
LDN OT III RA, use of, 252 wrong list, four basic reasons for,
44
leadls); see also cans wrong sources for lists in Routine 2, 20
are the leads connected to the meter and cans, 269 listing; see
also listing and nulling; nulling
extra meter lead, 323 drilling listing for a running item,
87
level(s); see also grades; states errors; see out lists
assessing a pc to higher levels to solve lower ones, 148
ill after listing, handling, 173, 249, 309
confidentiality of upper level RDs, 479 instant F/N
is a read, 488
pc can always be solved in or below where he is, 148
L4BRA form, 51
State of Case Scale and, 27 listing trouble as a symptom
of errors in lists, 173
State of Case Scale levels, 27 running items, listing
for, 351
Level 0, W/Cing materials added to, 293 self-listing; see self-
listing
Level II, Confessional materials added to Grade 11, 293 service
facs, Iisting for, 466
Level IV, L&N, PTS and SP tech materials added to, two-way comm
which turned into a listing action, 308
293 listing and nulling; see also listing; nulling
L4, handling each read as it's found, 38 dead horse, cause
of, 17, 44
L4BRA; see also out lists; wrong item Dianetic list can act as
an L&N list, 192
clear the words of an L4BRA before commencing Dianetic
list errors, recognizing and handling of, 192
listing processes, 443 Dianetic list, laws of
L&N sometimes apply to, 355
form, 51 errors; see out lists
handling reading questions on, 309 ill after listing,
handling, 173, 249, 309
Method 5 and, 51 instant F/N is a read, 488
prefixed with "On Dianetics lists___," 192 L4BRA form,
51
use of, 249, 309 lists not reading, handling, 309
"Was it the first item on the list?" added to, 309
materials on L&N, PTS and SP tech added to Level
life, living, IV, 293
area or zone of difficulty, handling, 299 no BD F/N
item found, handling, 308
cause over life, attaining it, 473 no item found,
handling, 308
get the M/W/Hs when life goes wrong, 5 nulling a list,
when to do it, 308
Have You Lived Before This Life?, 321 list questions,
check for read on, 124
life knocking ruds out faster than they can be audited
prepared list for correcting a recently done list, 45
in, handling, 128 reconstructing a list, 308
never did anything wrong in his whole life, 311 ruds are
usually not necessary in correcting a list, 44
only reasons for living, 453 self-listing; see self-
listing
past life; see past life service facs, listing and
nulling for, 464
pcs unable to go earlier than this life, handling, 232
two reading items on the list, handling, 309
prior assessment to this life, 233 two-way comm which
turned into a listing action, 308
service fac living pc's life for him, 458
verifying/correcting past L&Ns, 308
severe changes in a person's life, handling, 362, 400
violation of the laws of L&N, 44
Life Repair wrong list, four basic reasons for, 44
Drug Rundown and, 226 List One,
low TA pcs need a, 126 failing to find R/Ses on List One in
Routine 2, 17
line plot, description, 13 we're probably all rock slammers
somewhere on, 15
list(s); see also Dianetic lists, listing, Listing and nulling,
what it refers to, 278
nulling List One R/Ser,
complete list; see complete list characteristics of, 278
correction; see out lists definition, 231, 278
correction lists; see prepared lists jokers and
degraders and, 291
dead horse, cause of, 17, 44 two kinds of R/Sers, 231
Dianetic list can act as an L&N list, 192 verification
of a List One R/S, 231
Dianetic list errors, recognizing and handling of, 192 List 6
EW, use of, 251
endless lists in Routine 2, 21 List 7 Corrected, use of, 252
errors; see out lists living; see life
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
LIX; see Hi-Lo TA Assessment LSD (cont.)
location, moving the time track by, 25 development and history
of, 315
lock, definition, 59, 410 emotions shut off due to, 315
Locorten (hand cream), 235 Henry Luce and, 315
L1, handling each read as it's found, 38 "Killer drug," 324
L1C, lodged in body fat, 339
clear the words of an L1C and ruds early in auditing,
psychotics who have been on LSD 25, 314
443 references, 327
Dianetic errors that may require an, 138 residual LSD
in the body, handling, 324
is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC break, 143 stays in
the system, 315
on the injured member (Injury Rundown), 153 stupid due
to, 315
prefixed with "In your last session _," 171 Sweat Program
and, 106, 324, 327
use of, 250 trips during the Sweat Program, handling,
339
words of the list not cleared yet but pc in an ARC LSD case,
break, handling, 443 characteristics of, 315
loss(es); see also death; secondary consequences mean little
or nothing to, 315
assist handling of losses, 219 definition, 324
colds and, 219 disassociated, LSD case is, 315
Dianetics and, 66 Drug RD, when it is complete on an
LSD case, 324
handling losses by death, 362 recovery won't be fast,
315
handling of (on Original Assessment Sheet), 155 sweating
and heavy liquids and exercise needed to
LX1 assessed to grief or loss, 184 handle, 315
psychic trauma erased speeds recovery, 354 years after
they have "come off of" LSD, 315
Relief RD to handle, 400 L3 EXD RB, use of, 250
low TA, L3RF, L3RE, L3RD etc,,
apathy and, 126 checking auditor's handling of, 498
assists and, 219 clear the words of an L3RE before running
R3RA, 443
at exam, 126 form (L3RF), 135
auditing past exterior and, 103 handle all reading items
to EP, 364
calling high or low TA F/Ns, 223 if L3RF doesn't resolve
it, 101
commonest C/S for pc after Dianetic session that list was
unnecessary, handling, 140
ends with high or low TA and/or Bls at Examiner,
"L3RF Method 5 and Handle," 101
101 overruns are handled by, 481
commonest sources of, 199 question reads and pc says he
doesn't understand it,
Dianetic errors that cause high or low TA, 100
handling, 135
disregarded F/Ns and, 261 repair Dianetics within 24
hours with L3RF, 156
false TA vs, "low TA cases," 195 two-way comm and, 142
F/Ns and, 223 used to determine if pc has gone
exterior, 103
F/N VGIs at session end but low TA at exam, rea- use of,
142, 250
sons for, 126 word list for, 413
handling, 199 LX Lists,
having pc wipe his hands every few minutes to get children
and, 97
the TA above 2,0, 201 EP, 96, 489
invalidation causing, 196 handling, 489
Life Repair needed by low TA pcs, 126 HCOB on, 96
lousy TRs causing, 196 Method 5 and, 96, 489
making a meter read falsely low with hand cream, 201 no
valence change on LX lists, handling, 183
misassessment in Dianetics and, 101 overcharged case,
handling, 97
overwhelm and, 147 procedure, 489
overwhelmed pc and, 126 purpose of, 96
overwhelming TRs causing, 199, 201 references, 489
quitting because TA goes low, handling, 147 Routine 3RA
handling of, 96
Routine 3RA and high or low TA, handling, 433 three-
way or quad recall and engrams on LX list
ruds and, 449, 450 items, 183
start of session and, 449, 450 use of, 97
sweaty hands causing, 195, 199 LX1,
TA high or low in session but F/N at exams, what assessed
to grief or loss, 184
it means, 147 commands for running recalls and
engrams, 490
TA went low in session and didn't F/N, reasons for,
form, 99
126 use of, 97
too much and too greasy hand cream causing, 222 LX2,
unreading item run causing low TA, 126 commands for
running recalls and engrams, 490
very small cans or too small cans and, 196 form, 98
wet hands causing, 222 use of, 97
wide persistent F/N with TA low, what it means, 223 LX3,
Word Clearing and, 251 commands for running recalls and
engrams, 489
LP1, use of, 251 form, 107
LSD, Method 5 and, 97
characteristics of persons who have been on it, 315
use of, 97
cuts off circulation, 324 lying to his NED auditor, pc
generating out ruds by, 102
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
M medical doctor(s) (cont.)
ministers and, 220
Sweat Program and, 324
magnesium; see also Cal-Mag Touch Assist and, 55
calcium and magnesium supplements, 340 very sick pcs are
sent to a, 84
wet hands caused by deficiency of, 222 medical examination(s),
major action(s), as an answer to pcs hiding general illness, 128
Model Session and major action of the session, 450 assists
and, 216
overrun caused by recklessly or continuously rehab-
illness and, 102
bing a past major action, 132 seriously
physically ill and, 95, 186
session ended without a major action completed, should
be sought where needed, 216
handling, 180 Sweat Program and, 326
set up a case with F/N before undertaking major when C/S
orders it, 102
actions, 38 when to send pc for a, 91
sick pc being audited on a major action, how to pre- Medical
Liaison Officer, Sweat Program and, 325
vent it, 128 medical treatment, medical; see also
operations
major thought, assist is not engaging in, 217
instant F/N and, 487 assists and, 216
instant reads and, 438 Dianetics is not to be confused with
medical or other
Major Training Service, defined, 316 practices, 360
Man, medical terms or symptoms are never assessed in
drugs-psychiatrists' gift to Mankind, 483
Dianetics, 69
failingmaterialcultureand, 380 medical terms were put on
the running item list,
is basically good, 313 handling, 76
list of 57 human perceptics, 431 no conflict of interest
between any healing profession
old poem, an, 478 and Dianetics, 57
what he does when he finds he is being too destruc-
Touch Assist causing medical treatment to now work,
tive, 313 65
where the destructiveness of Man stems from, 312 what
medical treatment of "insanity" requires, 55
why he does not have really workable equipment, 380
when to use medical treatment, 92
Management Word Rundown, programming of, 129 medication, medicine(s),
marriage, R/Ses and, 9 audited over medicine (in Dianetics),
handling, 140
mass(es), mental mass(es), auditing a pc while on medication,
37
continual, recurring mass and PTS, 50 medicines are
drugs, 155
definition of mental mass, 409, 424 memory, drugs render
thetan forgetful, 105
destimulation in 3 to 10 days, 71, 124 mental image picture(s);
see also pictures
engrams, masses feel too solid to pc, handling, 179
actions of aspirin and pain depressants on, 104
going straight to a person's handling of masses and
auditor has more control over pc's mental image
changes of space with Confessionals, 297
pictures than pc does, 61
how mass collects, 457 definition, 408, 423
massy thetans, 132 mass and, 71
mental image pictures have mass, 71 mental image
pictures are all there is in pc's "mind,"
pc only restimulating masses because he doesn't 60
understand R3RA, 433 psychosomatic pain or
discomfort caused by, 104
persistent mass (in Dianetics), handling, 140 mental
institution; see institution
Pictures and Masses Remedy, 125, 433 mentaly retarded,
Dianetics and, 65
piling up mass by running several engrams through mental mass;
see mass
once, 71 metabolism test to check that pc has had enough
to eat
resists electricity, 71 (take a deep breath and
let it out), 323, 382
TA measures mental mass, 80 meter; see E-Meter
when pc said it was erased it still had a mass, hand-
metering,
ling, 140 checking the auditor's glasses out, 495
material(s); see also technology checking the auditor's
metering out, 495
additions of materials to certain checksheets, 293
discovering auditor weakness or uncertainty in meter Advanced
Course material insecurity, cases wrecked ing, 492
by, 129 how to tell auditors who have their
metering or basic
alter-is of, 275 definitions madly out, 101
confidentiality of upper level RDs, 479 out metering
caused by lack of Cramming and lack
C/S has to know his materials better than an auditor,
of Qual Divs, 342
148 references for NED auditors, 496
number of times over the material equals certainty "Two
hours TRs and metering" should always be
and results, 73 added by Cramming, 342
preventing unauthorized use or misuse of upper level
Word Clearers and, 263
materials, 479 Word Clearing, TRs and, 280
material culture failing, 380 Method 3,
medical doctor(s), Green Form and, 166
demanding they become competent, 259 handle each read as
it's found, 38
give the handling of the structural disease side of Method
5,
illness to the, 93 C/S Series 53RK and, 249
it is not up to Scientologists to salvage the wreckage
definition, 146
created by, 259 GF and, 173
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Method 5 (cont.) missed withhold(s) (cont.)
"L3RF Method 5 and Handle," 101 Prepchecking M/W/Hs,
command, 172
L4BRA and, 51 Prepcheck system not used unless you are
Prepcheck
LX Lists and, 96, 489 ing, 5
LX3 and, 97 procedure when asking for, 4, 448
NED Auditor Analysis Checklist and, 493 references,
449
mid ruds, Routine 2 and, 22 rough, angry ARC breaky session and,
2
mind, R/S on M/W/H, handling, 172
definition, 408, 423 sessions going wrong and, 5
Dianetics remedies anything caused by the, 66 staffs
going wrong and, 5
how mass collects, 457 tired pc and, 41
mental image pictures are all there is in, 60 two-way
comm to clean up M/W/Hs, 4
reactive mind; see reactive mind upset and, 278
minerals, Sweat Program and, 325 when to ask for, 3
minister(s), mistakes; see errors
assists and, 217, 220 misunderstood(s), misunderstood word(s),
see also Word
historical role of, 220 Clearing
is bound to relieve his fellow being of anguish, 217
alterations caused by, 274
medical doctors and, 220 auditor responsibility to
ensure pc understands the
responsibility of, 220 commands and procedure, 433
Volunteer Minister s Handbook, The, 243 auditors who
stop producing or blow due to, 205
what he should be equipped to do, 217 cleared word
defined, 334
miracles and Dianetics, 344, 358 command misunderstood, effects
of, 442
misapplication; see application command misunderstood,
handling, 136, 442
misemotion; see also emotion Course Supervisor checking students
on a meter for,
definition, 60 149
emotion, motion and, 10 definitions, which ones to
clear in W/Cing, 334
out list and, 249 detection of, 149
mishandled pc, handling, 171 Dianetic CS-1 and, 404
missed withhold(s); see also rudiments; withholds experiencing
what it's like to find a real MU, 263
ARC break is only caused by an, 448 it's a word (not
phrase or idea or concept), 149
ARC breaks stem from, 2 jokers and degraders and, 291
asking for M/W/Hs vs, asking for withholds, 5 looking
up words you don't understand in a defini audited over M/W/H,
handling, 168 tion, 334
boiling off and, 3 making fun of things one doesn't
understand, 291
command (best beginning ruds question), 4 misunderstood
case condition, handling, 167
command for Prepchecking M/W/Hs, 172 NED auditor
misunderstoods, finding and handling
command for use during Prepchecking, 4 of, 492
commands for ruds, 4, 448 out tech alterations are most
commonly caused by, 274
commands (Prepcheck Zero Questions), 4 pc confused about
the meaning of commands, hand concluding intensives by cleaning up
M/W/Hs, 4 ling, 442
critical of Scientology and, 3 penalty for going by MUs
in despatches and telexes,
critical pc and, 3 221
definition, 2, 411, 426, 445, 448 penalty for neglecting to
clarify words not under difficult session caused by, 3
stood, 203
dirty needle is caused by, 3 question reads and pc
says he doesn't understand
dissemination failures and, 3 it, handling, 135
exhausted pc and, 3 reads and, 443
foggy pc at session end and, 3 rebellious students and,
291
havingness dropped and, 3 tone level during study
related to, 149
HCOB on, 2 TRs being done over a, 336
if not cleared on itsa get the basic on the chain, 38
Word Clearer accumulating, 335
indicators or manifestations of, 3, 448 Model Session,
lack of auditing results and, 3 almost all confusions on
Model Sessions stem from
life going wrong and, 5 inability to do TRs, 157
manifestations cured by asking for, 3 procedure, 450
nattery critical aspect and, 41 Modern Management Technology
Defined, 258
no gains occur in the presence of, 445 money, handling troubles
with, 179
not tracing it down to basic when it doesn't blow, 37
monopolles, healing and, 64
pc angry at auditor and, 3 moral code, withholds and, 297
pc answers M/W/Hs with PTPs, handling, 170 mores,
transgressions against, 297
pc attempting to leave session and, 3 motion~al),
pc complaining bitterly and, 5 Confessionals going into
person's most confused mo pc demanding redress of wrongs and, 3
ional areas, 297
pc failing to make progress due to, 3 definition, 10
pc not desirous of being audited and, 3 misemotion,
emotion and, 10
pc not in session due to, 448 motivator(s),
pc refusing to talk to auditor and, 3 cases which do not
resolve on actual motivators, 49
pc telling others auditor is no good and, 3 definition,
49
picking up M/W/Hs keeps pcs in session, 2 false
motivator, 49
Prepchecking and when to ask for, 4 "motivator hunger,"
49
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
motivator(s) (cont.) narrative(s), narrative running (cont.)
overts and, 49 by Narrative R3RA, 100
reason it is called a "motivator," 49 run only it if
reads well with pc interest, 354
motive, destructive vs, constructive, 313 secondaries,
handling of, 387, 394
movies, stuck in incidents from, 234 somatic chains vs,, 79
multiple declare, definition, 120 taking narrative items and
running them as somatic
multiple illness, definition, 62 chains, 108
multiple item; see Dianetic item trick in running narratives,
354
music, when it is truly art, 319 using Narrative R3RA Quad and
full preassessment
M/W/H; see missed withhold procedure on troubled areas,
102
mystery, what you are handling in R3RA Narrative
running,
mystery point handling in assists, 219 477
thetan could be called a "mystery sandwich," 219 when to
go earlier similar, 130
natter(y),
handling nattery or critical pc, 169
N M/W/H gives a nattery critical
aspect, 41
pc nattery as a symptom of errors in
lists, 173
withholds and, 76
narrative(s), narrative running, Nazi(s),
asking for earlier incident in engram running by LSD and,
315
chains vs, in narrative running, 476 Nazi criminal
outgrowths, 259
assists and running the incident itself narrative, 218 NED
Auditor Analysis Checklist, 492
auditing out sessions, 79, 364 NED (New Era Dlanetics); see
Dianetics
chains are not held together by, 69 NED (Rundown) for OTs,
chronically ill pc and, 56 Advanced Courses Specialist
delivers it, 482
clue to erasure of a, 477 auditors and C/S must be
trained at Flag, 479
commands for all flows, 386, 393 available at AOs or Flag,
389, 473, 478, 482
commands for narrative assessment, 354 bond signed not to
disclose the materials of, 479
definition of narrative (item), 130, 354 color flash
for "NED for OTs" folders, 479
drilling handling of narrative incident commands, 88
confidentiality of, 479
Drug RD narrative handling of drugs, 362 development
of, 482
earlier beginning command, importance of using it, EP, 473
386 OT VIII and, 482
earlier beginning, finding it each time person is moved raises
perceptions, especially theta perceptions, 482
through the incident, 354 required before
graduating RPF, 478
earlier beginning takes precedence over earlier inci-
who can study the materials, 479
dent, 477 needle; see also various needle reactions by
name
earlier beginning vs, earlier incident, 393, 400 all you
know when the needle read, 33
earlier beginning vs, earlier similar, 79 how to keep
the needle on set, 280
engram running by chains vs,, 476 neglect,
ensuring enough run throughs have occurred, 344 neglect
of duty, 221
EP, 354 non-optimum personal existence and, 216
EP, how to attain it, 344 of staff cases, handling, 287
erasure occurs when the postulate is obtained, 477 nerve(s),
nervous system,
erasure, what it depends upon, 400 actions of aspirin
and pain depressants on nerve chan example, 101, 130, 417
nels, 104
example of how a typical narrative item might run,
controlling the nerves so they don't transmit,453
417 pain gets stopped in the nerves, 122
example of what is and isn't a, 354 sympathetic nervous
system pains, 122
example of what isn't a, 385 neurosis, only data Man has on
the subject of, 279
failure to properly run a narrative incident, effects new,
of and how to handle, 344 Grade Chart is the "new"
thing to do, 226
getting pc's wording of it, 354 idea that the "old" is
always cancelled by anything
grinding and, 386, 400, 477 "new," 118
handling of, 344, 354 New Era Dianetics; see Dianetics
interest and, 354 Newton, Sir Isaac, 118
it takes as long as it takes, 344 night, high TA auditing late
at night, 124,197, 272
long sessions running narratives, reason for, 79 no auditing,
not asking for earlier beginning causing no erasure, as
the most basic failure of cases, 277
131 definition, 17
only going E/S if it starts to grind very badly, 79,
deliveryvs,, 276
130, 344, 354, 386 is first and greatest error of
Routine 2, 16
Original Assessment Sheet, handling of, 155 no case gain; see
case gain
postulate, asking for the postulate, 354 Non-lnterference
Zone,
preventing narratives from being run through once
definition, 482
ortwiceandabandoned,130 DianeticClearsand,117
procedure for narrative running, 354, 386, 393 not-is, pc's
not-is of the picture squeezing it into invisi psychic trauma,
handling of, 354 bility, 130
reason for running a, 385 not know, not knowingness,
results of narrative handling, 354 any sensory
perceptive cut-off is an effort not to know,
running a narrative item by regular R3RA instead of
298
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
not know, not knowingness (cont.) Operating Thetan(s) (cont.)
no cognition and, 298 Dianetic Auditing Assists,
secondaries, engrams or
overts and withholds and, 298 narrative incidents
are no longer run on, 215
stupidity is not knowingness, 299 Dianetic Clear going onto
OT 1, 117
nouns, making a list of nouns for a Confessional, 298
Dianetics forbidden on, 91, 150, 473
"Now I'm supposed to's," 297 Dianetics not run on, 389, 482
nulling, see also listing; listing and nulling didn't make
OT VI since he had a PTP all the way, 68
clean needle is vital to null a list in Routine 2, 22
handling pre-OTs with high OT sections that do not
when to null a list, 308 change non-optimum
behavior, 39
when to null a list in Routine 2, 22 illness handling
on, 91
numb, idea that if you're numb nothing can hurt you, it's the
grade processes and OT levels that improve
453 cases, 38
lower grades harmonic into the OT levels,
116
NED for OTs, development of, 482
O out grades and the IV Rundown,
120
pre-OTs; see pre-OTs
State of Case Scale and, 27
Oak Knoll Naval Hospital, 57 theta perception, raising of, 482
Objective ARC, unissued OT grades, 287
brings a person up to PT, 361 operation(s); see also medical
treatment
commands, 356 abdominal operations and unresolved
pains, 122
EP, 356 assists and, 217
procedure, 356 Dianetic handling after an, 65
programming of, 361 handling of (on Original Assessment
Sheet), 156
ObjectiveHavingnessProcesses, definition, 439 injuries or
operations persisting despite a full assist,
Objective(s), ObJective Process)es)(ing), reason, 218
automaticity of pictures handled by, 434 psychiatric
brain operations and illegal pcs, 259
Dianetic auditor and, 359 Touch Assists should follow
an, 65
drug handling program and, 106 opposition lists, 18
Drug RD and, 362 opposition terminal(s),
Drug RD without full and complete Objectives is not
combination terminal and, 11
a Drug RD, 333 definition, 11
Objective ARC is the first Objective Process to be HCOB on,
10
done on a pc, 356 method of testing for, 12
programming of, for NED, 361 R/Ses and, 11
quickie Objectives, cure of, 333 rule for listing a, 12
references, 333 sensation is experienced from, 11
two-way comm and quickie Objectives, 333 sensation is
turned on by, 12
unburdening cases with, 234 Tiger Drill buttons and, 12
why they work on drug users, 453 ways of asking for, 12
withdrawal symptoms eased by, 106 oppterm; see opposition
terminal
observation, putting a stable datum there to substitute orders, idea
that a later order cancels earlier orders, 118
for, 457 organization(s), org(s),
obsession(s), breakdown due to failure of executives to wear
their
service fac and, 458 ethics and justice hats, 207
service fac processing to handle, 462 clearing up an org
or area where Cramming Officers
OCA graph, have been messing it up, 345
auditing over ARC break reduces a, 445 delivery; see
delivery
reason a case that reads high may drop lower after downstat
area, handling, 207
auditing, 152 endurance and prosperity of a group,
what it depends
social machinery and, 152 on, 209
Okay to Audit Checksheets, 248 enturbulation caused by jokers
and degraders, 291
old, idea that the "old" is always cancelled by anything
establishing whether a person will attempt to ruin or
"new," 1 18 stop an, 8
old poem, an, 478 illegal pcs and, 259
old-timer, standard action for an, 40 most important zone of
ethical conduct in an org is at
omissions from folders, 256 or near the top, 207
one-handelectrode(s), pc has done something harmful to orgs,
handling of
falsely high TA and, 195 (on Original Assessment
Sheet), 156
false TA and, 48, 72, 195, 282 repute of org at risk due
to false auditing report, 254
F/N and, 48, 72, 93 staff; see staff
how to make a, 195 vanishing from Man's view, reason
for, 5
how to use them, 195 what the loss of Sec Checking would
do to, 278
marking TA readings from a, 195 Original Assessment (sheet),
sensitivity and, 48, 72 assessing tone of voice, 355
sizes of cans to use, 195 begin Dianetics with the, 155
TA goes up more than a division using a, 282 commands for
the, 353
"one-shot" cures, 91 doing a new one when the old list F/Ns or
draws a
Operating Thetan(s); see also OT 111; OT VIII, blank,
102
assists and, 150, 215 Drug RD and, 361
Clears or OTs who are R/Sing are not R/Sers, 478 form,
367
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Original Assessment (sheet) (cont.) out list(s), list errors
(cont.)
handling of, 155 apathy and, 192
how and when it is done, 360 ARC breaks and, 192
how many chains can come from an, 353 can raise more
concentrated hell with a pc than any
neatness of, 367 other single auditing error, 249,
309
needle reactions, noting of, 367 correcting the earliest
lists, 173
original items and, 350 C/Ses to handle, 173
procedure, 367 dead horse, cause of, 17, 44
programming of, 367 don't do ARC breaks first in a case
of, 146
purpose of, 367 extreme upsets and, 192
reassessment of, 363 handling errors in lists, 44, 51,
173, 189, 308
Relief RD and, 362, 400 handling when old earlier
lists not available, 174
R-Factorfor, 367, 379 ill after listing, handling, 173,
249, 309
Second Original Assessment, 401 incomplete lists and
Routine 2, 19, 20
TA action, noting of, 367 L4BRA to handle, 51
use of, 350 list correction blow-up, handling, 308
what a difficulty given by pc on Original Assessment
misemotion and, 249
is composed of, 353 no worksheets, handling, 308
what it gives you, 360 persistent item that doesn't blow,
handling, 175
when it is done, 367 reconstructing a list, 308
where it goes when completed, 367 ruds are usually not
necessary in correcting a list, 44
who does it, 367 self-listing due to out lists, handling,
308
original item(s); see also Dianetic item steps to correct a
list, 44
definition, 350 symptoms of, 173
doing a new preassessment on the same original item,
three SPs found on one list, handling, 174
353 verifying/correcting past L&Ns, 308
drilling preassessment on an, 87 wrong list, four basic
reasons for, 44
example, 351, 416 out of session; see also in session
example of getting a running item from an, 351 dirty
needle and, 6
exampleof usingPreassessmentListon, 352 not OK to
call pc's attention to his hands, TA, or
how many chains can come from an, 353 meter during
session, 235
Original Assessment Sheet and, 350 pc or pre-OT not in
session, handling, 166
persistent F/N before original item is gone, handling,
putting pc's attention on the meter or his hands, 201
427 thinking of something else to get an F/N, 198
pictures or masses touched on in life or auditing out of
valence; see also LX Lists; valence
treated as, 434 charged up person and, 96
preassessment and, 70 Class VIII handling of, 152
tend to be general in character, 350 command to handle,
39
what to do if the original item was already handled, EP
of LX Lists, 96, 489
137 EP of out of valence processes, 96
when you stop working on the, 353 fat folder and, 96
where it comes from, 352 handling, 181
origlnation(s), originate, originatlng; see also TR 4 handling
of (on Original Assessment Sheet), 156
comments differentiated from, 162 handling with LX Lists
and R3RA, 96
definition of originate, 162 HCOB on, 152
handling pc originations (TR 4), 162 Identity Rundown
handling of, 357
noting reads while pc is originating items, 438 NED
handling with Identity Rundown, 152
OT; see Operating Thetan no TA on a Sec Check and, 39
OT III, OCA graph and, 152
Green Green Form, use of, 252 out-ethics people and,
208
LDN OT Ill RA, use of, 252 person does not easily as-is
his bank when he is, 96
out grades and, 120 person in treason on Ist dynamic is,
97
standard one-time action for a Section III OT, 40
perverts, suppressives and critical, snide, ruthless,
OT IV Rundown, arrogant or contemptuous personalities
are, 96
out ruds pcs and, 46 SP has to be out of valence to be
SP, 152
"overwhelmed by auditing" added to, 120 three-way
recall and engrams on, 183
reason it was developed, 120 220H, use of, 97
OT VIII, valence shifter list question, 39
NED RD for OTs and, 482 out-point, HC Out-Point-Plus-Point
Lists RA, 251
release of, 287, 482 out rudiment(s),
OT TR 0, commands, position, purpose, etc,, 157 Advance
Courses and, 46
out-ethics; see also ethics assists and rud handling, 218
definition, 210 audited over an ARC break, problem or
withhold
handling of, 207 (in Dianetics), handling, 139
NED auditor out-ethics, handling, 499 audited over out
ruds, handling, 168, 181, 185
out of valence and, 208 Dianetics and, 100, 101, 139
persons whose ethics have remained out must be re- GF used
on, 250
placed, 207 manifestations of (in Dianetics),
101
PTS and, 208 many pcs get better even when audited
over all
out list(s), list errors; see also L4BRA; wrong item
kinds of, 102
always C/S to correct lists first when lists are out, 146
NED session and, 76
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
out rudiment(s) (cont.) overt(s), overt act(s); see also
rudiments
OT IV Rundown and out ruds pcs, 46 anaten in
session caused by overts, handling, 435
pc generating out ruds by Iying to his NED auditor,
assists and overt act handling, 218
102 continuous overts; see continuous overts
physically ill pcs and, 102 definition, 49, 426, 448
review and, 102 definition of "a goal which is an overt
against Scien special versions of out ruds, 102 tology,"
8
symptoms of, 101, 168 evil purpose is expressed by
committing harmful acts
out tech, and withholding them, 314
basic Why of the majority of, 203 false motivator and, 49
covered up by false auditing report, 254 false overts
case, 49
detecting falsified auditing reports, 254 false overts,
handling, 49
faulty W/Cing and, 264 false reads, checking for, 310
illness following auditing, reasons for and handling
gamblers take no responsibility for, 304
219 "Greatest Overt" process, 114
in-tech, the only way to achieve it, 273 high TA and,
199
lack of proper success story points to, 254 invalidated
for getting it off, handling, 310
misunderstood words are the commonest cause of
motivators and, 49
out tech alterations, 274 never did anything wrong
in his whole life, 311
misunderstood words as the basic Why of, 203 no gains
occur in the presence of, 445
pc refusing to re-sign and, 254 no overts person, 311
penalty for failure to clear each word of every com-
not knowingness and- 298
mand or list used, 204 overt engrams, running
of, 396
reason for the bulk of out tech in an area, 109 overt of
omission, definition, 49
round-up of out tech issues, 274 pc felt overts weren't
accepted, handling, 310
spreading about due to false auditing reports, 254 person
heavily the effect of something has done it as
tech "out" in an area because some auditors can't an
overt, 176
deliver simple Dianetic sessions, 109 protesting
getting off overts already gotten off, hand violation of correct
clearing of commands is, 444 ling, 310
out TRs, PTS and environmental continual overt, 50
as a major NED error, 108 punished for getting it off
handling 310
caused by lack of Cramming and lack of Qual Divs,
recurring overt defined, 310
342 recurring withholds and overts, handling, 310
either being inaudible or overwhelming or TR 4 not
references, 449
handled, 100 service facs and, 461
handling, 495 shallow overts, 311
reasons for, 495 stupidity caused by, 299
overburdened case, destimulation of, 233 overt-motivator sequence,
two sides of, 241
overburdened incident, 122 Overt-Withhold Straightwire, Know to
Mystery Scale
overcharged case, recognition and handling of, 97 and, 1
overrun(s), overrunning, overweight people and Sweat Program, 339
basic, overrun of, 474 overwhelm(ed)(ing),
bypassed F/Ns, handling, 261 handling overwhelmed pc,
124
caused by recklessly or continuously rehabbing a past
high TA and, 124
major action, 132 it is engrams which overwhelm
the thetan, 29
checking overrun when TA goes high on ruds,167, low TA
and, 126, 147, 199, 201
168 low TA caused by overwhelming TRs, 199, 201
Contact Assist or Touch Assist and, 151 "overwhelmed"
added to GF 40, 119
cutting pc's comm and, 42 "overwhelmed by auditing"
added to IV Rundown,
demanding earlier than there is causing, 474 120
Dianetic overrun, effects and handling of, 480 repair
is only done to get off the overwhelm, 228
erased chains can be overrun, 143 O/W, dictum of using no O/W
processes in ruds, 4
F/N indicated too late (in Dianetics), handling, 135
Oxford Capacity Analysis; see OCA graph
F/N not indicated at all causing overrun (in Dia-
netics), handling, 136
F/N overrun due to false TA, example, 194
high TA and, 48, 71, 124, 132, 142 P
incomplete actions and, 171
jumped chains causing overrun, handling, 136 package sales, 317
missed F/Ns and, 280 Paid Completion(s); see also completions
non-basic, overrun of, 474 bonus points, 317
postulate bypassed causing overrun (in Dianetics),
formula, 316
handling, 136 penalties, 317
postulate on chain, effects of overrun past the, 384,
red tag unhandled and, 317
392, 480 simplified, 316
Quad Dianetics and, 134 verification of, 318
rehabbing old no longer used processes, 43 pain(s); see also
sensation; somatic
same thing run twice in Dianetics, handling, 138 as a
symptom of previous bad auditing, 169
underrun, incomplete actions and, 171 being processed on
wasting and having pain, 453
why TAs go high on, 124 combination terminal and, 12
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
pain(s) (cont.) perfect(ion),
definition, 10 how to be a perfect C/S, 148
drugs and, 453 how to get auditing into a state of, 5
"electrical" and, 10 persist, that which is not confronted and
inspected
gets stopped in the nerves, 122 tends to persist,
457
havingness and, 453 persistent mass, handling (in Dianetics),
140
heat, cold and electrical is pain, 10 personality, the test of
a, 313
mental image pictures cause psychosomatic pain or penersion,
alcohol use and sexual perversions or prom discomfort, 104
iscuity, 175
only things that turn on pain, 31 penerts, out of valence and,
96
pain depressants, actions of, 104 physical illness; see illness
pain of a suppressed or invalidated GPM, 32 physlcal trauma, 56
prevention of painful situations, 453 physical universe,
universe,
protest increases intensity of, 453 drugs as a defense
against the, 453
sympathetic nervous system pains, 122 false TA is in the
physical universe not the pc's think
terminals produce pain, 10 or bank, 266
terminal turns on pain, 12 is not a trap capable only of
degradation, 29
unresolved pains, two reasons for, 122 picture(s), facsimile(s);
see also mental image pictures
pain-killers, categories of, 104 all black (in Dianetics),
handling, 139
past life, past lives, automaticity of pictures, handling, 434
children and, 233 constantly changing pictures (in
Dianetics), handling,
famous people and, 233 140
Have You Lived Before This Life?, 321 cycle of drug
restimulation of, 105
invalidation of, 233 definition, 408, 423
past life reality being hurt by people who talk about
definition of facsimile, 456
being Napoleon, Caesar and God, 129 destimulation
in 3 to 10 days, 71, 124
people talking about their cases, 129 drugs inhibit
erasure, 105
reasons pcs won't go backtrack, 233 erasure and, 78
remedies, 232 imaginary incidents remedy, 435
why druggie won't go backtrack, 233 invisible picture
(in Dianetics), handling, 139
Past Life Remedies, leaving picture partially there by not
getting the
procedure, 232 postulate, 71
programming of, 363 pc's not-is of the picture squeezing
it into invisibility,
references, 363 130
pastoral counselling and Dianetics, 64 reason all picture chains
are there, 80
past track; see backtrack stuck picture; see stuck picture
patch-up; see repair thetans copying or picturing incidents
and then getpc; see preclear ting stuck in the later
portion of them, 132
pc folder; see folder unflat pictures or masses, handling, 433
penalty, penalties, why pc's pictures do what the auditor
says, 61
auditor and C/S penalties for various offenses, 202 Picture
and Masses Remedy,
comm-evable offense to let pc attest Dianetic Case
commands, 433
Completion before Preclear Checklist is complete, EP
of, 434
365 high TA handled with, 125
ethics penalty for Word Clearers, 335 is done after Drug
Rundown, 125
falsifying an auditing report, penalty for, 255
procedure, 433
for C/S permitting auditor to write incomprehensibly
programming of, 125, 363
or omit data, 221 references, 363
for failure to employ study tech, 203 when to C/S it, 433
for failure to make and include worksheets in pc's pigeon holes,
163
folder, 257 pinch test procedure, 405, 419
for failure to uphold or set an example of high ethical platens,
do not clear the words on the, 444
standards, 208 pleasure moments, definition, 61
for false auditing report, 282 plus-point, HC Out-Point-Plus-
Point Lists RA, 251
for faulty W/Cing, 264 poem, an old, 478
for going by MUs in despatches or telexes, 221 points, Paid
Completions simplified, 316
for loss of pc's folders, 257 post(s),
for violations of study tech, 203 basic Why of post non-
performance, 203
Paid Comps stat penalties, 317 joking about one's post,
291
Study Tech and Post HCO PL, penalties for violation
penalty for going by MUs in despatches or telexes, 221
of, 221 roller-coaster on, 210
perception(s), perceptics; see also awareness study tech
and, 221
any sensory perceptive cut-off is an effort not to postpartum
psychosis, 65
know, 298 postulate(s),
difficulties, handling of, 156 allowing pc to get all
the charge and postulates out
list of 57 human perceptics, 431 of basic, 344
NED RD for OTs raises, 482 all picture chains are there
because the first time and
people with out-ethics withholds cannot see, 208
the postulate are there, 80
shut-offs of, 361 assists and postulate two-way comm,
218
theta perception, raising of, 482 bypassed postulate on the
chain, handling, 136
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
postulate(s) (cont.) potential trouble source(s) PTS)es)(ness)
(cont.)
can be confused with bouncers and denyers, 480 out-
ethics conduct toward the SP, 208
chain is held in place by the, 62, 80, 262, 384, 392,
percentage of, 247
480 personal roller-coaster, source of, 50
chain is held in place by the basic and the, 80 physical
illness and, 208
cognition vs,, 403, 480 prerequisite for PTS handlers,
244, 245
command (in R3RA) to ask for, 343, 384, 392, 403, psychos,
becoming PTS to, 279
480 PTS/SP Checksheet, study of, 244, 245, 246, 276
definition, 410, 424 study method of curing PTSes, 246
don't call F/N until you've gotten the, 384, 388, 391
tech correction round-up data concerning, 275
drilling checking for postulate in R3RA, 88 when to
handle PTSness, 275
effect of ending off before pc has given the, 71 why PTS
case does not respond to processing, 50
ending, chain or engram at first sight of an F/N and powder;
see talcum powder
wondering why no postulate came off, 131 power,
powerful,
engrams and, 332 anything truly powerful is truly simple,
81
EP of chain is postulate coming off, 384, 392 service
fac destroys power, 458
EP of Dianetic chain and, 62, 66, 125, 262, 332, 343, power of
choice; see choice
384, 388, 392, 403, 451, 480 Power Process)es)(ing),
erasure occurs when the postulate is obtained, 477
checklist for folder of pcs onto Power, 302
erasure occurs when the postulate made during the Dianetic
Clear is not run on, 117
basic incident is gotten off, 59 EP and, 403
examples, 480 Ex Dn and, 303
F/N vs, postulate in NED, 262 Expanded Grades not a
prerequisite for, 226, 303, 307
getting the postulates in the basic incident, 343 F/Ns are
disregarded in, 262, 403
ignore Dianetic F/Ns until postulate has come off to
LP1, use of, 251
F/N and VGIs, 388 prerequisites for pcs) 302
it's the postulate-not the F/N that we are going for
Quad Grades are a requisite to, 307
in NED, 62 practical; see also application; drills
leaving picture partially there by not getting the getting
auditing into a state of perfection and, 5
postulate, 71 is never in the same room with
theory, 284
more than one postulate in the basic incident, 344
practical drilling is done on the twin basis, 284
narrative running and, 354 twins are highly
interchangeable on, 284
overrun by demanding earlier than there is, 474 practices;
see also former therapy
overrun past postulate on chain, effects of, 384, 392,
Dianetics is not to be confused with medical or other
480 practices, 360
postulate off equals erasure, 384, 391, 480 earlier
practices handled with Expanded GF 40RB,
recognizing when you hear one, 480 250
there was a postulate that was not expressed (in Dia-
earlier practices, handling, 181
netics), handling, 139 former practices,
handling of (on Original Assessment
usually comes off in the form of a cognition, 480
Sheet), 156
what you're erasing is the basic postulate that made
three-way or quad recall and engrams on earlier
the chain, 474 practices, 183
potassium and Sweat Program, 340 preassess(ing), preassessment(s);
see also assessment
potassium gluconate tablets, 340 assessing tone of voice, 355
potential trouble source(s), PTS)es)~ness); see also roller-
assists and preassessing the incident, 218
coaster checking auditor's grasp of, 497
accidents and, 210 commands, 353
blowing charge on past PTS handlings, 246 definition,
350
cassette to send or play to antagonistic people, 276
doing a new preassessment on the same original item,
constant recurring somatic, pressure or mass and, 50
353
data, 244, 245 drilling listing for a running item, 87
definition, 50, 240, 275 drilling preassessment
procedure, 86, 87
environmental continual overt and, 50 Drug RD and, 362
environmental menace and, 50 example of getting a
running item from a preassess false PTSness, 247 ment
item, 351
full handling of, 275 finding the next running item, 353
gains not held by PTS pcs, 360 Identity Rundown and, 357
handling, 246, 275 instant F/N is always handled first,
355
handling PTSness before you begin Dianetic audit- instant
F/N is a read, 488
ing, 360 item gotten had no charge on it,
handling, 137
handling, what full handling would consist of, 244,
Iousy job of assessment, effects of, 475
245 medical terms and, 76
insanity and, 240 noting reads while pc is giving
items, 352
jokers and degraders and, 291 order of handling reads,
355
materials on L&N, PTS and SP tech added to Level original
item and, 70
IV, 293 procedure, 352
mechanism of, 50 references, 498
most people in institutions are probable PTSes, 240 R-
Factor to give tne pc about, 406
non-audited handling of, 280 there was another
preassessment item that should
only engrams that will run and erase on a PTS case, 50
have read, handling, 137
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
preassess(ing), preassessmentls) (cont.) preclearls) (cont.)
TR 100: Preassessment Procedure on a Doll, 87 critical
pc and M/W/Hs, 3
TR 100-A: Preassessing a Doll Coached, 87 C/S does not
see the, 36
using Narrative R3RA Quad and full preassessment
currently on drugs, handling, 155
procedure on troubled areas, 102 definition, 409,
422
volunteered running item, handling, 351 delicate pc,
handling, 172
what it does, 350 demanding redress of wrongs, 3
why we have the preassessment procedure, 70 Dianetic pcs,
how long to audit them on NED, 117
word list for, 412 difficult pcs, there are no, 7
preassessment item(s); see also Dianetic item does not
respond to auditing, handling, 181
definition, 351, 352 doesn't want auditing; see doesn't
want auditing
example, 352, 416 "dog pc" and auditor refusing to
audit, 213
getting running items from, 352 "dog pc" is simply a
problem in repair, 213
had no charge on it, handling, 137 done something
harmful to Dianetics, Dianeticists,
running items are gotten from~ 351 Scientology,
Scientologists or orgs, handling, 156
there was another preassessment item that should don't be
reasonable about pc's complaints, 5
have read, 137 effects of missing F/Ns on, 280, 281
Preassessment List, ends session with Bls, handling, 166
definition, 350 exhausted pc and M/W/Hs, 3
Drug RD and, 362 "failed pcs," reason for the bulk of
them, 109
example of using it on an original item, 352 flinching pc,
31
form, 414 foggy at session end, 3
instant F/N is always handled first, 355 folder; see
folder
is designed to locate somatics, 353 forcing the pc; see
forcing the pc
procedure for preassessment, 351 gone into despair over
his TA, handling, 273
running items gotten by the, 414 hands; see hands
use of, 414 hard to handle in session, handling, 166
precipitation, causes of, 216 has not done well on Dianetics
and no other reason
precision, Dianetics and, 358 can be found, handling,
192
preclear(s); see also case; thetan held up by the auditor
(in Dianetics), handling, 139
acutely ill pc, handling, 56 HGC Pc Application Form,
330
anaten or dope-off in session, handling, 433 hot pc,
handling, 272
angry at auditor, reason for, 3 how do you know what good
auditing is unless you're
answers ARC breaks with PTPs, handling, 170 trained?
285
answers M/W/Hs with PTPs handling, 170 how to make any pc
sit up and get audited smoothly, 5
answers PTPs with ARC breaks, handling, 170 hungry pc,
handling, 272
"ARC breaky pc" and M/W/Hs, 2 illegal pc; see illegal
pc
area or zone of difficulty, handling with Confession-
ill pc is easily made an effect, 95
als, 298 in grief after too much overcorrection
and errors,
asking pc what the auditor did, 94, 100, 102, 144, 147
handling, 168
assign fast auditors to fast pcs, 94 in recent shock of
having died, handling, 233
attained some state and it was invalidated, handling,
"insane" pc, handling, 84
140 institutional history, 259
attempting to leave session, 3 jokers and degraders, 291
auditing a pc on no sleep, 37 looking on himself as
someone else, handling of, 156
auditing a pc while ill, 37 main complaints and symptoms
of, 360
auditing a pc while on medication, 37 makes trouble for
auditors, handling, 181
auditor demanded more than pc could see, handling
manifestations and remarks not changing, handling,
(in Dianetics), 138 102
auditor has more control over pc's mental image pic-
manifestations cured by asking for M/W/Hs, 3
tures than pc does, 61 mishandled pc (from
folder inspection), handling, 171
auditor refused to accept what pc was saying, hand-
misunderstood case condition, handling, 167
ling (in Dianetics), 138 "more there" with out of
valence handling, 152
auditors "feeling they cannot help the pc," 213 nattery
or critical pc, handling, 169
auditors picking and choosing pcs, 213 never did anything
wrong in his whole life, 311
audit the pc in front of you, 17 never rush a pc or hold
him up, 388
automaticity of pictures coming in, handling, 434 new pc,
use Quads on a, 143
being less willing to reach and duplicate events of the no
auditing as the most basic failure of cases, 277
past, reason, 439 no overts person, 311
believing things don't erase, reason for, 196, 480 not
audited for some time, handling, 166
breath, having pc take a deep breath and let it out,
not in session, handling, 166
323 overrepair and, 38
can always be solved in or below where he is, 148 people
talking about their cases, 129
can't hold things still, handling, 434 phenomena of pc
occurs after phenomena of meter,
charge prevents pc from confronting the time track, 28
42
cold pc, handling, 196, 272 physically ill pcs, handling,
95, 102, 181
complaining bitterly and M/W/Hs, 5 prepared lists
include anything that could happen to
confidence improved by establishing a standard of a
pc or student, 248
excellence pc can predict, 7 problems pc is
trying to solve with processing, hand confidence of pc lies in how
standard the auditor is, 3 ling, 156
critical of orgs or people of Scientology, 3 process pc
should be on is always the next grade, 38
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
preclear(s) (cont.) prepared list(s) (cont.)
rabbiting pc, 31 items as statements, 345
raw meat requires a textbook session, 6 for
correcting a recently done list, 45
reason pc does not read on a meter, 31 handle each read as
it's found, 38
refusing to re-sign, reason, 254 if L3RF doesn't resolve
it, 101
refusing to talk to auditor, 3 if not cleared on itsa
get the basic on the chain, 38
reluctant pc due to previous bad auditing, 169
inability to read a meter causes them not to work, 248
requesting Review, handling, 166 instant differentiated
from latent reads, 438
rest; see rest instant F/N, when it is taken up, 487
R/Ses and, 231 keeping them in supply for use, 252
sad pc, handling, 101 L4BRA form, 51
seat pc in chair furthest from the door, 381 list of
prepared lists with dates of issue and descrip sleeps too much,
handling, 177 tions of use, 249
soft-spoken quiet "inoffensive" person, Sec Checking
list of word lists for, 252
of, 311 L3RF form, 135
stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books, L3RF was
unnecessary,handling, 140
handling, 234 LX1 form, 99
symptoms of pcs and how to handle, 163 LX2 form, 98
take the pc's data, never take his orders, 381 LX3
form, 107
telling others auditor is no good, 3 no read auditors,
handling, 146
tends to take over session, handling, 166 no reads,
handling, 249
terminally (fatally) ill pcs, 259 "Okay to Audit"
checksheet prerequisites for audi
tired, pc looking or feeling continually tired, 41
tors, 248
unable to go earlier than this life, handling, 232 only
reason for not working, 248
unaudited pcs, major Why of, 213 pc lists, description and
use of, 249
unconscious pc, handling, 151, 219 pc should
understand he sits quietly holding cans
vanishing pcs and M/W/Hs, 5 during assessing, 407
very sick pcs, handling, 84 pc who begins by protesting a
repair list being done,
well and happy pc (being), Dianetics and, 85, 350
handling, 252
353, 360, 389, 441 penalty for failure to clear
each word of every com
went Clear and nobody would let him declare, hand-
mand or list used, 204
ling, 140 prerequisites before auditor is permitted
to assess
when to cut a pc's comm with regard to an F/N, 42
them, 248
who erases before he can tell about it, 81 question
reads and pc says he doesn't understand it,
who falsify TA or F/Ns, 198 handling, 135
who has been denied processing by the GO, 259 Repair
List for Prepared Lists, 252
who has the largest R/Ses, 11 staff lists, 251
who has trouble needs training, 117 student lists, 250
who won't attest, handling, 120 such lists include
anything that could happen to a pc
why pcs don't come back into session with an F/N, 42
or student, 248
wound up at Examiner caved in, handling, 171 tech
correction round-up and, 286
preclear checklist, form, 365 translated issues, 252
prediction of recovery, 219 TR Debug Assessment, 336
predispositlon, causes of, 216 TR 1 weak causes them not to
work, 248
prefacing Prepcheck questions, 469 weekly or monthly Qual
check on TR I and ability
pregnancy, to make a question read, 263
running out the engram of delivery, 65 who can use them,
248
woman going to have a baby, Dianetics used on, 66 word
lists for, 252
premoniffon that the incident was going to occur, 400
Prepcheck(ing); see also Repetitive Prepchecking
pre-OT(s); see also Operating Thetan ARC break uncovered by
Prepcheck, handling, 470
double folder danger, 115 buttons, order they are used
in, 469
F/N and, 48, 72 buttons, use of, 469
RPF and, 478 command for asking for M/W/Hs, 4
prepared liot(s); see also various prepared lists by name
command for Prepchecking M/W/Hs, 172
asking pc the question in a questioning tone of voice,
commands, 470
430 EP for a Prepcheck button, 470
assessing with a statement's tone of voice causes false
F/Ns, when to Prepcheck F/Ns, 169
and protest reads, 430 is a series of types of
decisions thetans make about
BPC on improperly done past prepared lists, hand-
things, 467
ling, 252 modern Repetitive Prepchecking, 469
call items to pc as questions, not as statements, 345
mushes engrams, 469
clearing word lists for, 252 M/W/H handling and, 4
clearing words of correction lists, when to do it, 421,
M/W/H Prepcheck Zero Questions, 4
443 M/W/Hs, when to ask for M/W/Hs in Prepcheck
confidential and AO lists, 251 ing, 4
Cramming Repair Assessment List, 345 M/W/Hs, when to
Prepcheck M/W/Hs, 172
C/Sing of, 249 never prepcheck while doing Dianetics,
143
delivery repair lists, 248 old ARC breaks turned on and
uncovered by, 39
description of the prepared list system, 248 only time it
cannot be done, 469
Drug RD Repair List, 485 Prepchecking Section III, 40
evaluation or invalidation of pc caused by calling
Prepchecking"Withholds?" 170
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Prepcheck(ing) (cont.) procedure,
procedure, 470 there is only one exact procedure, 75
releasing charge and providing relief with, 470
violation of procedure, C/S handling of, 76
service facs and, 467 process)es),
time limiter and, 469 almost all confusions on processes
stem from inability
what can be Prepchecked, 469 to do TRs, 157
present time; see also environment clearing commands, when
to do it, 443
bringing the pc to PT in assists, 219 communication, what
makes it work in processes, 439
engram matching PT dangers, handling, 181, 185 mini
list of Grade 0-IV processes, 471
getting a pc to PT in engram running, 26 old-timer,
standard action for an, 40
injured or sick person is out of, 219 rehabbing old no
longer used processes, 43
Objective ARC brings person up to, 361 will not function
in the presence of bad TRs, 157
present time problem(s); see also problem; rudiments processing;
see auditing
audited over PTPs, handling, 181 Product Clearing Long Form,
reference, 251
by Examiner statement still had a PTP after last
professionai(s), professionally,
session, handling, 172 interneships and, 328
commands, 447 professional competence and pride, 273
definition, 411, 425, 447 professional rates, 284
didn't make OT VI since he had a PTP all the way,
strengthening auditor's determination to be profes
68 sionally competent, 273
if not cleared on itsa get the basic on the chain, 38 Progest,
325
"in session-ness" vs,, 447 program(s), programming,
looking at pc's PTPs for areas to handle with Con- actions
a Solo auditor may and may not do, 127
fessionals, 298 assessing a pc to higher levels to
solve lower ones, 148
no case gain and, 101, 126 assists in the midst of grade
auditing, 218
no gains occur in the presence of, 445 auditing out
sessions, programming of, 364
not tracing it down to basic when it doesn't blow, 37
backwards programming, example, 307
pc answers PTPs with ARC breaks, handling, 170 bad
programming, example, 305
pc audited over PTP won't make gains, 101 chronic
somatic handling, 125
procedure, 447 complete an auditing cycle once begun,
115
references, 449 cracking most cases to a point vhere they
run well,
Remedy B as a method of handling, 171 procedure,
250
repeating PTP, handling, 170 C/S Series 1-13RA cover
use of the Grade Chart
Routine 3RA and, 67 in programming, 228
withholds indicated by, 299 Dianetic Clears, auditing of,
117
pressure, Dianetic CS-1, programming of, 361
bypassed flows causing heavy pressure, 132 Dianetic pcs,
handling of, 117
continual, recurring pressure and PTS, 50 Dianetics
Prepared Assessment Rundown, program definition, 10
ming of, 363
trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive, programming of,
(in Dianetics), handling, 140 363
pressure somatic, definition, 61 Disability RD, programming of,
364
pretending, pretense, disregarded F/Ns, sample clean-up C/S to
handle, 261
definition of pretense, 210 doing "whole org" auditing
actions, 115
pretending training or grades not attained, handling,
drug handling program, what it includes, 106
181 Drug RD, programming of, 361
three-way or quad recall on pretending, 181 effect
incomplete or misdone Objectives, DRD, Sweat
pride, professional competence and, 273 Program or
Dianetics has on Ex Dn, 349
prior assessment to Drugs or Alcohol, what it does, 362 example
of a typical and ideal program, 307
prior assessment to this life, 233 Ex Dn programming, 305
prior confusion, assist handling of, 219 Ex Dn, when it can
be run, 225, 241, 279, 303
prior reads and dirty needles, 6, 7 Expanded Grades,
programming of, 226, 228, 307
problem(s); see also present time problem; rudiments Expanded
Grades, when they can be run, 303
assists and problem handling, 218 false TA, when to handle
it, 260
audited over a problem (in Dianetics), handling, 101,
FESer's duty to indicate if pc made last grade and is
139 set up for next grade, 283
command "In your last session did you have a prob- GF 40,
when to use one, 119
lem?" 171 Grade Chart is the basic program of a pc,
228
command prefixed with "In auditing has there been Hard TR
Course for NED, programming of, 361
an/a ," 170 hold the form of grades and
processes, 305
definition, 411, 425, 447 Identity RD, programming of,
364
differentiating between a problem that concerns pc it's
always the earlier actions that are out, 148
and an effort to blow session, 162 LX Lists, use
of, 97
Grade I is out if a Grade II or above has a, 120 major
Why of programs not getting finished, 213
leaving pc with a, 37 misprogramming, example of, 213
no case advance and, 119 mixing Ex Dn and PTS handling,
305
problems pc is trying to solve with processing, hand-
NED full pc program outline, 360
ling, 156 NED is a requisite to Ex Dn, 441
problem of long duration, new Grade Chart, 226
handling with Confessionals, 298 new grades without having
completed earlier grades,
withholds indicated by, 299 reason for and handling
of, 282
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
program(s), programming (cont.) psychiatrist(s) (cont.)
Objective ARC is the first Objective Process to be are
simply outright murderers, 259
done on a pc, 356 burying R/Ses with shocks or
surgery, 241
Objective ARC, programming of, 360 drugs-
psychiatrists' gift to Mankind, 483
Objective Processes and, 356 not as successful as
priests in relieving mental an Objective Processes for NED,
programming of, 361 guish, 220
off-line case actions, 128 R/Ser and, 242
Original Assessment Sheet, programming of, 367 psychiatry,
psychiatric,
Past Life Remedy, programming of, 363 defined psychosis
as "incompetence," 313
pc can always be solved in or below where he is, 148
how its practitioners became dishonest, 200
Picture and Masses Remedy, programming of, 363 it is
not up to Scientologists to salvage the wreckage
Power Checklist, 302 created by, 259
PTS handling vs, Ex Dn, 305 killing the "insane" and
increasing their number, 66
PTSness, when to handle it, 275 originated in Germany,
313
PTS RD, when it can be given, 279 product of, 66
Quickie Grades, answer to pc who had them, 116
psychiatric brain operations and illegal pcs, 259
Relief RD, programming of, 362 psychotics subjected to
psychiatric "treatment" or
repair, only reason it is done, 228 psychological
"counseling" are the most difficult
Sec Checking vs, Ex Dn, 305 to handle, 314
Second Original Assessment, when it is done, 401 reason
for conflict between Dianetics and, 57
Solo Course R6EW, requisites for, 113 shock treatment;
see shock treatment
staledated or abandoned programs, major Why of, 213
twelve years of study to do psychiatry, 66
State of Case Scale is useful in programming a case, psychic
trauma,
27 Auditing Assist and, 56
Student Rescue Intensive, programming of, 111 handling
by running incidents out narrative, 354
study rundowns, programming of, 129 psycho; see psychotic
Sweat Program, programming of, 361 psychoanabtic cases,
Dianetic CS-1 and, 404
what is started on a case must be completed, 305
psychologist(s),
when all else fails use GF 40, 120 abolish them, 259
progress; see case gain not as successful as priests in
relieving mental an
Progress Program(s), guish, 220
answer to the pc who had "Quickie Grades," 116 psychology,
definition, 116 defined psychosis as "incompetence," 313
Quickie Grades pcs need a, 117 originated in Germany,
313
Repair Program is renamed a, 116 psychotics subjected to
psychiatric "treatment" or
there are no Solo Progress Programs, 127
psychological "counseling" are the most difficult
used to consolidate case gain which has not been to
handle, 314
earlierachieved, 116 psychosis,
prolongation, basis of psychosis is motive, 313
causes of, 216 competence or incompetence is not the
basis of, 313
how prolongation of a chronic injury occurs, 55
destruction and, 313
promiscuib, alcohol use and, 175 disaster and, 313
propitiation, "F/N" and, 47 gamblers and, 304
prosperity of a group, 209 how it begins and progresses, 313
protein, is the most severe aberration, 313
predigested liquid protein, 325 more about psychosis, 313
predigested protein, 340 only data Man has on the
subject of, 279
Sweat Program and, 325, 340 psychiatry and psychology
defined it as "incompe
protest(s)(ing), tence," 313
art and, 319 R/Ses and, 231
assessing with a statement's tone of voice causes pro-
the test of a personality, 313
test reads, 430 psychosomatic (illness); see also illness
assists and handling protest in the incident, 219
definition of psychosomatic, 60
checking Protest when TA goes high on ruds, 167,
Dianetics and, 57
168 Dianetics is the remedy for, 65
effect of auditing pc under protest in Dianetics, 131
Dianetics remedies anything caused by the mind, 66
high TA and, 131, 147, 199 mental image pictures cause
psychosomatic pain or
interest vs, protest in R3RA, 388 discomfort, 104
pain intensity increased by, 453 psychotherapy, dishonesty and,
200
pc protesting getting off withholds already gotten off,
psychotic(s); see also rock slammer; suppressive person
handling, 310 alcoholic is a, 304
pc shows signs of protesting in session, handling, 170
destructive basic purpose and, 313
pc was protesting, handling (in Dianetics), 138 drug
addict is a, 304
pc who begins by protesting a repair list being done,
evil purpose and, 313
handling, 252 examples of famous psychotics, 313
putting in Suppress and Protest on an area of interest
gamblers and, 304
in Dianetics that hasn't read, 103 general
motive or purpose determines ~,vhether or not
ruds, false reads and, 38 he is insane or sane, 313
psyche, definition, 220 Grade II Expanded and, 314
psychiatrist(s), one R/S doesn't make a, 240
abolish them, 259 percentage of, 314
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
psychotic(s) (cont.) quality,
PTS to psychos, 279 technology and, 34
those subjected to psychiatric "treatment" or psycho-
tech quality, improvement of, 342
logical "counseling" are the most difficult to han-
queries, handling student questions, 74
dle, 314 question(s); see also commands
those who have been on drugs, particularly LSD are asking
the question as a question, not a statement
very difficult cases, 314 of fact, 355
we are not in the business of handling, 279 ask pc the
question in a questioning tone of voice, 430
we're not in the business of curing psychos, 242 call
prepared list items as questions, not statements,
PT; see present time 345
PTP; see present time problem list questions, check for read
on, 124
PTS; see potential trouble source student questions, handling,
74
PTS Rundown; see also Search and Discovery voice tone rises on
a question and goes down on a
audits the pc at effect, 305 statement, 355
do not have to be Ex Dn auditor to deliver a, 279 quickie,
Ex Dn vs, PTS handling, 305 Objectives being quickied,
cure of, 333
not restricted only to Ex Dn, 275 paying bonuses for
"completions" leads to quickie
prerequisite for PTS handlers, 244, 245 actions,
202
prerequisites for auditor to deliver it, 280 penalty for
C/Sing or delivering quickie auditing, 202
when it can be given, 279 Quickie Grade(s),
PTS RD Correctlon List, use of, 250 answer to pc who had, 116
public, penalty for failure to apply study tech in dissem-
definition, 117
ination, 204 these pcs need a Progress Program
and an Advance
punishment, punlshed, Program, 117
pc punished for getting overt or W/H off, handling,
310
physical punishment of students, 110 R
purpose,
basic purpose, everyone has a, 313
blunted purpose and tiredness, 41, 177 rabbit, definition, 145
listing "What purpose has been blunted?" 41 rabbitlng pc, 31
psychotic has destructive basic purpose, 313 rashes, Dianetics
and, 66
tired pc and blunted purpose, 41 raw meat requires a textbook
session, 6
RD; see rundown
reach,
Q havingness and, 439
less willingness to reach, remedy of, 439
Tone Scale position determined by ability
to, 439
Q and A, acknowledgement and, 381 reactive mind, bank,
Quad Gradeo restored, 307 assessment is done by the auditor
between the pc's
Quadruple Dlanetlcs, bank and the meter, 355
Dianetic Assist can be run Quad, 151 bank beefing up,
definition, 10
Drug RD Quad, 361 bank gone solid, handling, 179
folder unavailable, 133 definition of bank, 408, 423
high TA handling, 133 definition of reactive mind, 408,
423
introducing Full Flow Dianetics, 144 how mass collects,
457
missing flows, running of, 133 out of valence person
does not easily as-is his bank, 96
overrun and, 134 read(s)(ing); see also E-Meter; various E-Meter
reads by
overrun, how you know it is occurring, 142 name
rehabbing chains, commands for, 141 all you know when
the needle read, 33, 38
rehab or run, 134 area of interest that hasn't read in
Dianetics, hand "rehab or run Fl, F2, F3, F0 if they read" when
ling, 103
getting in all flows, 133 auditor assessed by
interest only, not by read, hand rehabs and, 133 ling, 76
reruns, 132 charge and, 487
suddenly running a Single or Triple pc on Quad, check
for read on two-way comm subjects, list ques effect of, 434
tions or Dianetic items, 124
use of, 143 clean needle; see clean needle
use Quads on new pcs, 143 clearing commands and, 438,
443
what happens if any later grade is run with more
definition of what a read means, 487
flows than is used in earlier actions, 132 false
reads; see false reads
what happens when a flow not run on earlier items fishing
a read, 460
is run on later items, 132 F/N, when it is a read,
338, 487
which auditors can be trusted with, 143 footplates
obscure F/Ns and reads, 235
Qualificatlons Dlvlslon, Quai, handling each read on a list
as it's found, 38
examinations must not be discussed outside Qual, 32
instant and latent read defined, 438
is not fast flow, 248 instant F/N and BD Dianetic items
are the best, 130
out TRs and metering caused by lack of, 342 instant F/N
is a, 487
stat of, 286 instant F/N takes precedence over all
other reads in
tech quality, improvement of, 342 Dianetics, 487
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
readls)(ing) (cont.) rehab(s), rehabbed, rehabbing, rehabilitation
(cont.)
instant read; see instant read disregarded F/Ns,
handling, 281
L&N lists not reading, handling, 309 don't rehab on a
high TA at session start, 38
largest reading items are ones pc can most easily don't
use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic chain,
confront, 355 142
largest reading running item is chosen, 353 F/Ns,
rehabbing of, 48, 178, 281
latent read; see latent read old no longer used
processes and, 43
longest fall or BD noted in Dianetic assessment, 355
overrun caused by recklessly or continuously rehab longest read
or pc's interest, 63 bing a past major action, 132
means item is real to pc, 487 overrun or missed F/N,
rehabbing of, 48
misunderstood words read on the meter, 443 Quad
Dianetics and, 132, 133, 134
narrative item is run only if it reads, 354 rehabbing
former releases for each type of drug
non-reading meters, 31 taken, 176
no read auditors, handling, 146 Rehabilihtlon Pro3ect Force,
pre-OT staff members
no reads on prepared lists, handling, 249 and, 478
noting reads while pc is giving items, 352, 355, 438 release,
order of handling in Dianetics, 355 believing things
don't erase or release, reason for,
order of handling items in Dianetics, 487 196, 480
Original Assessment Sheet, noting needle reactions checking
to see if the process went release out of
on, 367 session, 180
protest reads caused by assessing with a statement's
definition, 424
tone of voice, 430 Dianetic chain is not a, 142
question reads and pc says he doesn't understand it, it
is necessary to find an earlier item if something
handling, 135 does not release, 445
reasons pc does not read on a meter, 31 overran the
F/N and invalidated the release due to
take the best reading item on the running item list,
false TA, 194
351 release of affect, 56
taking an item that doesn't read in R3RA, 100 reliable
item(s),
unreading item or subject run causing high TA, 124
definition, 11
unreading item run causing low TA, 126 opposing Rls in
Routine 2, 18
unreading items in Dianetics, effects of trying to run Relief
Rundown,
them, 475 Original Assessment Sheet and, 362, 400
weekly or monthly Qual check on TR I and ability
procedure, 400
to make a question read, 263 programming of, 362
reality, religion, religious,
definition, 411, 425 alcohol use and religious fixations,
175
read means item is real to pc, 487 assists and, 217,
220
R/Ses and reality level, 11 handles the upsets and anguish
of life, 220
reasonable, don't be reasonable about pc's complaints, 5 remedies,
Recall(s), Recall Processes, Dianetic remedies, 433
three-way or quad recall on drugs, 176, 182 Dianetic
remedies, references, 363
three-way or quad recall on pretending, 181 Past Life
Remedies, 232
unburdening cases with, 234 Remedy A, Student Rescue Intensive
and, 110
recovery, Remedy B,
auditor recovery, 283, 289 PTP handled by, 171
auditor recovery program, 205 Student Rescue Intensive
and, 111
LRH recovering lost tech, 380 too many GF, Remedy Bs
and S & Ds, handling, 168
recovery (from illness), used when Misunderstood Case
Condition on GF
assists greatly speed recovery, 216 reads, 167
Dianetics speeds up recovery from disease under
repair(s)(ing), patch-up(s),
treatment, 65 area of interest that hasn't read in
Dianetics, hand erasing the psychic trauma speeds recovery, 354
ling, 103
LSD case and, 315 assessing a pc to higher levels to
solve lower ones,
slow recovery after an engram has been run, reason
148
for, 219 assists in the midst of grade auditing,
218
two-way comm on how long he/she expects to take auditing
out sessions, 79, 364
to recover, 219 betterment isn't occurring with
Dianetics, handling,
red tag, Paid Comps and, 317 102
Registrar, Case Supervisor Actions HCOB, 163
HGC Pc Application Form and, 330 commonest C/S for pc
after Dianetic session that
returning money to illegal pc, 331 ends with
high or low TA and/or BIs at Examiner,
registration, illegal pcs and, 259 101
rehab(s), rehabbed, rehabblng, rehabilihtion, correcting a
bad session, 75
anything that produces a release of a thetan from the
cracking most cases to a point where they run well,
body can be rehabbed, 176 250
checking to see if the process went release out of Cramming
Repair Assessment List, 345
session, 180 C/S Series 53RK practically handles
the whole repair
command for rehabbing bypassed F/Ns, 178 of any
difficult case, 249
commands for rehabbing chains, 141 delivery repair
lists, 248
counting the number of times released, 43 Dianetic pc
audited over out ruds, handling, 101
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
repair(s)(ing), patch-up(s) (cont.) resistive case(s) (cont.)
Dianetics and, 101 long sessions and, 181
Dianetics and Int RD Repair List, 135 makes trouble for
auditors, 181
Dianetics is repaired by L3RF, 156 Resistive Case
Rundown, purpose of, 119
disregarded F/Ns, handling, 261, 281 roller-coaster and,
181
"dog pc" is simply a problem in repair, 213 symptoms of,
181
Drug RD needing repair or redo must include study thick
Review folder and, 181
to see if Objectives were honestly run, 333 when to
use a GF 40, 119
Drug RD Repair List, 485 responsibility,
failed sessions due to lack of speed, 94 gamblers and,
304
false auditing report denies means of repairing pc, 254
increased by Sweat Program, 326
false TA causing over-repair, 266 irresponsible due to
drugs, 105
getting the F/N to Examiner, 124 LSD case and, 315
if L3RF doesn't resolve it, 101 rest; see also sleep;
tiredness
illegal patch-ups, 129 don t audit pc who has not had
sufficient rest, 272
it s always the earlier actions that are out, 148 helps
result in a return to sanity, 56
list of prepared lists with date of issue and descrip-
insane pe and, 84
tion of use, 249 pc who can't get rest, handling, 125
only reason it is done, 228 restimulate(d), restimulating,
restimulation; see also
out lists, see out lists key-in
overrun in Dianetics, handling, 481 cycle of drug
restimulation of pictures, 105
overwhelm gotten off by, 228 earlier ARC break on
engrams was restimulated,
Past Life Remedies, 232 handling, 138
pc can always be solved in or below where he is, 148
earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated, handling, 138
pc gets ill after auditing but sessions look alright
high TA and, 71
handling, 102 high TA caused by chains left in
restimulation, hand pcs can be stopped by over-repair, 38
ling, 433
pc who begins by protesting a repair list being done,
past death was restimulated (in Dianetics), handling,
handling, 252 140
physically ill pcs, handling, 95, 102, 181, 186 pc only
restimulating masses because he doesn't un remedy for anyone W/Ced
without a resolution of the derstand R3RA, 433
difficulty, 263 safe solution adopted as a retreat
from environmental
Repair List for Prepared Lists, 252
restimulation, 456
Routine 2 case patch-up, 23 unflat or restimulated engram
chains and high TA,
too many repairs that were badly done, handling, 168
124
too much over-correction and errors, handling, 168 what
happens on the E-Meter when you restimulate
uses of the various prepared lists, 249 an
engram, 71
Repair List for Prepared Lists, use of, 252 result(s),
Repair Program(s), All Flows Rundown results, 134
renamed Progress Program, 116 are not obtained when one
"interprets" or changes
there are no Solo Repair Programs, 127 the original
tech, 275
Repeater Technique no longer used, 58 assist results, 150
Repetitive Prepchecking; see also Prepchecking deviating
from exact procedure gives poor or bad
commands, 469 results, 75
EP for a Prepcheck button, 470 Dianetic results, 68, 75,
108
procedure, 470 Dianetic results are achieved by
addressing and hand
Repetitive Process, definition, 426 ling the spirit,
360
report, no report, 221 Dianetic result sometimes attained with
Scientology,
represent list, never represent R/Sing items, 18 68
repression(s), HCOB on, 68
handling of, 156 honesty of auditor determines results,
200
is an after the fact item, 428 lack of auditing results
and M/W/Hs, 3
research, narrative running and, 354
AD 28-the year of technical breakthroughs, 482 NED
auditor not getting good results, handling, 492
unissued rundowns, 287 NED results, errors that prevent
them, 108
re-sign, pc refusing to, 254 number of times over the material
equals certainty
resistance, and, 73
E-Meter measures electrical resistance, 71 program to
recover full use and results of Expanded
E-Meter, TA and, 260 Lower Grades, 116
mass has resistance to electricity, 71 Routine 2 and, 16
resistive case(s), Scientology result sometimes attained
with Dianetics,
blows courses or orgs, 181 68
complaints and, 181 Scientology results, what they are,
68
does not respond to auditing, 181 "secret" of producing
high case gain and total results
doesn't want auditing and, 181 with NED and
Scientology, 108
do not state "Resistive Cases" but "Special Cases, Solo
grades and, 113
181 Sweat Program results, 326
Expanded GF 40RB and, 250 team and, 85
handling, 181, 190 technology applied gets uniform good
results, 101
hard to get F/Ns and, 181 when tech doesn't get results
it is incorrect, 275
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
retrain, rock slam(s) (ing) (cont.)
errors that require a retrain in Dianetics, 100 handling
of, 241
falsified report gets a, 144 High Crime not to mark
them down and report them,
retread, no passing grade = retread course, 329 229
Return Program(s), history of the term, 238
name changed to Advance Program, 116 how you can turn
off an R/S and mistakenly think it
there are no Solo Return Programs, 127 is handled,
241
review(s), importance of being able to locate them in the
folder,
betterment isn't occurring with Dianetics, handling,
242
102 instant rock slam defined, 11
Dianetic pc and, 58 intended harm and, 242
interplaying NED with Scientology reviews, 84
invalidation and, 241
out ruds and, 102 invalidation as a cause of, 172
Past Life Remedy that can be done in, 234 is the most
important needle manifestation, 239
pc requesting review, handling, 166 is the most
valuable needle response in clearing, 11
R-Factor, long duration Sec Checking shows up R/Ses, 311
definition, 382 lowest reality level pc is hardest to
attain R/S on, 11
Dianetic CS-1, R-Factors given to the pc during, 406
marriage problems caused by, 9
Examiner, R-Factor to give pc about the, 407, 421
mechanically caused R/Ses, 238
for Original Assessment Sheet, 367, 379 most easily
turn on during Sec Checks or pulling
never order an R-Factor that takes pc into future or
W/Hs, or trying to investigate something, 240
past, 147 most important and dangerous read on the
meter, 277
preassessment, R-Factor to give pc about, 406 M/W/H,
handling R/S on M/W/H, 172
Scientology CS-1 R-Factor, 419 neither overt nor
motivator handles a, 241
Second Original Assessment R-Factor, 401 no freedom to
choose caused by, 462
right(ness), noting and recording of, 229, 238, 240
becoming wrongness, 461 only do opposition lists on
R/Sing items, 18
in order to survive you have to be right, 457
oppterms, terminals and, 11
intention to be right is the strongest intention in the
pcs who R/S, 231
universe, 458 pc who has the largest R/Ses, 11
making the other fellow wrong in order to be right,
psychosis and, 231
457 psychotic, one R/S doesn't make a, 240
obsession to be right in order to survive, reason for,
reality level of pc and, 11
458 recognizing one, 239
right/wrong, dominate and survive, 457 references, 461
rights, auditor's rights modified, 213 remedy is not to sack,
shoot or divorce somebody, 9
right wag oppose, Routine 2 and, 20 reporting of, 238
rings, R/S caused by, 197, 238, 272 report it to Ethics, 240
rocket read, description, 239 rings causing, 197, 238, 272
rock slam(s)(ing), R/Ser is different from someone with an
R/S, 231
activates on invalidate or withhold or on other Pre-
R/Sers and, 229
Hav Levels, 11 R/Sing pre-OTs put on the RPF
require NED RD
all R/Ses result from a pair of items in opposition, 11
for OTs before graduating, 478
at Examiner, handling, 172 service fac is a brother to,
461
be sure to get the crime back of the, 172 short circuit
in meter causing, 238
cans touching something like a dress causing, 238 succumb
and, 231
cause of R/S is an intention to harm, 241 tech
correction round-up data concerning, 277
children and, 38 theta bop differentiated from, 238
circling of, 240 total reason for an R/S is to make wrong,
461
cleaning up an, 38 turning off or submerging it, 241
Clears or OTs who are R/Sing are not R/Sers, 478
understanding what lies under that R/S, 241
crime as a cause of, 172 valid R/Ses are not always
instant reads, 454
definition, 8, 11, 229, 238, 277, 454 vanishes under
suppression, 11
demonstrating one on a meter with no pc or cord what it
means with regard to the pc, 240
connected, 239 what the energy cause, in the bank,
of it may be, 241
dirty needle differentiated from, 455 what they mean, 238
dirty needle turning into an, 459 width of, 229, 238, 454
dominates the individual, 462 rock slam channel, definition,
11
don't ever indicate R/Ses, 239 rock slammer(s); see also
psychotic; suppressive person
don't vilify or mow down people who R/S, 242
characteristics of, 230
error of representing an R/Sing item, 18 checklist to
assist in the identification of, 230
everyone alive R/Ses on something, 13 Clears or OTs who
are R/Sing are not R/Sers, 478
evil intention and, 11, 240, 241, 454, 461 Cramming
Officer an R/Ser, effect of, 345
evil purposes and, 231 crime in society caused by, 242
Ex Dn for pcs who R/S, 231 effects of, 230, 345
failing to find R/Ses on List One in Routine 2, 17 evil
intentions and, 240
falsely handling a, 241 examples in history, 242
F/N and, 48, 72 Ex Dn is given to, 231
F/N differentiated from, 238 experiential track of,
230
gamblers and, 304 inoperational meter does not mean
you have an, 229
games condition and, 11 is different from someone with
an R/S, 231
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
rock slammer(s) (cont.) Routine 2-12 (cont.)
jokers and degraders and, 291 errors, two broad
divisions of, 14
List One R/Ser; see List One R/Ser HCOB on, 14
long duration Sec Checking shows them up, 311 Routine 3H,
references, 472
meter sometimes "goes crazy" on, 229 Routine 3R,
NED full program and Ex Dn are mandatory for command C
changed to "Move through the inci
R/S cases, 441 dent," 343
percentage of, 229 Flow One, Step One command change,
349
psychiatrist and, 242 may not be attempted in Solo
auditing, 127
reliable route to the handling of an, 462 scan through
to the end of the incident is incorrect,
R/Ses and, 229 343
R/Sing pre-OTs put on the RPF require NED RD Routine 3RA; see
also chains; engram; engram run
for OTs before graduating, 478 ning;
incident; narrative
Sec Checks and, 240 anaten or dope-off occurring,
handling, 433
service fac processing to handle, 462 ARC breaks and, 67
SP and, 229 asking for earlier incident after Step 9
or Step C, 474
staff and, 229 asking for earlier incident in engram
running by
two kinds of, 231 chains vs, in narrative
running, 476
we're probably all R/Sers somewhere on List One, 15
assessment steps, 350; see also assessment
roller-coaster(s); see also potential trouble source auditing
out sessions Narrative R3RA, 79
after an apparently good session, what it means, 180
auditing out sessions, references, 364
NED case who roller-coasters, handling, 83 bad auditing
and, 67
on post, 210 bad sessions can be run out using, 58
personal roller-coaster, source of, 50 basics, references
to the basics, 497
PTS and, 210 blowing by inspection, 81, 388
resistive case and, 181 bouncers, handling of, 343
room; see auditing room checking auditor's grasp of R3RA
theory and pro
rote, understanding procedure vs, rote chant, 81 cedure,
496
rough auditing, effects of, 23 chronically ill pc and, 56
Routine 0-A, references, 471 command change, 343
Routine 2, command "Did it erase?" 81
all gain or lack of gain is assignable only to the audi-
command for asking for an earlier similar incident
tor, 16 using Narrative R3RA, 79
auditor responsibility and, 16 command for checking
interest in an item, 351, 353
bonus packages and, 19 command for earlier beginning, 81,
383, 395
case not winning on Routine 2, handling, 23 command for
earlier incident 383, 391
clean needle is vital to null a list in, 22 command for
listing for running items, 351
complete list and, 21 command "Has it erased?", 101, 384,
391, 403
dead horses, source of, 17 commands for Flows 2, 3 and 0,
385, 392
definition, 15 commands for LX1 handling, 490
difficult mid ruds and, 22 commands for LX2 handling, 490
dirty needle and, 22 commands for LX3 handling, 489
endless lists, what they stem from, 21 commands for
narrative assessment, 354
errors of, 15 commands for rehabbing chains, 141
failing to find R/Ses on List One, 17 commands for
running 220H recalls and engrams, 490
failure to save records of, 17 commands for service fac
handling, 466
incomplete lists and, 19, 20 commands for the Original
Assessment Sheet, 353
length of lists in, 22 commands in full, 382, 390
methods for converting a dirty needle to a clean commands
in full for narrative running, 386, 393
needle, 21 command to ask for postulate, 343, 384,
392, 403, 480
no auditing is the first and greatest error of, 16
completing chains, reason for, 388
only reasons a list will not complete on, 20 DEF; see DEF
opposing Rls in, 18 definition, 381
patch-up of, 23 demanding pc go through non-basic more
than twice,
remedy of cave-ins on, 15 effects of, 474
results and, 16 demonstration of how it works, 406
right way oppose, only real test of, 20 destimulation
in 3 to 10 days, 71
rough auditing and, 15 Dianetic Clear must not be run on,
117
rules, 18 earlier beginning; see earlier beginning
training and use stress of, 14 earlier incident; see
earlier incident
when to null a list in, 22 earlier methods of running
engrams, R3RA has no
why Routine 2 errors are more deadly than purely
dependence on, 381
auditing errors, 23 effect of ending off before pc
has given postulate, 71
wrong sources for lists in, 20 effect of running several
somatic chains without
wrong way oppose and, 20 erasing any, 71
Routine 2-10, ending session, 389
errors, two broad divisions of, 14 engram running by
chains, 25, 380
HCOB on, 14 engram running by chains and Narrative
R3RA-an
Routine 2-12, additional difference, 476
basic auditing and, 14 engram running prevented by failure
to clear com-
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Routine 3RA (cont.) Routine 3RA (cont.)
mands and procedures of, 433 TA action, Dianetic
auditor is not concerned with, 474
EP of a Dianetic chain, 62, 66,125, 262, 332, 344, TA goes
up on running a late engram and comes
384, 388, 391, 403, 451, 480 down on
basic, 71
erasure; see erasure TA rising on Step 9 indicates
something earlier, 384,
example of how a typical Dianetic chain might run,
392
416 there's no substitution for actually
understanding
example of how a typical narrative item might run,
what's going on, 81
417 TR 101: R3RA to a Wall, 88
failed sessions, reason for the majority of, 94 unerased
flow preventing others from erasing, 452
flows that won't erase, handling, 452 unreading items,
effects of trying to run them, 475
F/Ns, calling of, 61, 262, 388, 403, 480 using
Narrative R3RA Quad and full preassessment
going earlier, 384, 392 procedure on troubled
areas, 102
grinding; see grinding what you're erasing, 474
high TA, cause and handling of, 71, 81, 433 Routine 3SC-A,
high TA caused by chains left in restimulation, hand-
automaticity, running off the, 467
ling, 433 commands, 464
high TA on basic, handling, 81 Dianetic Clears and, 463
how to show up auditor inability to handle aspects EP, 468
of, 492 indicators that you've found service fac,
467
how you get pc stuck up on the track, 388 listing for
the service fac, 466
instant F/N takes precedence over all other reads,
procedure, 464
487 Routine 6 End Words ~R6EW),
interest of pc in item; see interest Dianetic Clear is
not run on, 117
late things hang up where earlier like things exist,
List 6 EW, use of, 251
428 requisitesfor, 113
locating items to run, 396 Solo auditing and, 112
low TA, handling, 433 routing form(s),
LX Lists, handling of, 96 HGC Pc Application Form, 330
moving pc through the incident with each run through
Staff Statuses and, 286
vs, scanning, 343 R/S; see rock slam
NED command training drills, 86 R/Ser; see rock slammer
no earlier incident, no earlier beginning, handling,
rudiment(s), ruds; see also ARC break; missed with 388
hold; overt; present time problem; withhold
not able to erase because pc does not understand asking
for M/W/Hs vs, asking for withholds, 5
R3RA, handling, 433 clearing commands of, 443
Original Assessment Sheet, handling of, 155 clear the
words of an L1C and ruds early in auditing,
out of valence, handling of, 96 443
overrun by demanding earlier than there is, 474 command
for earlier similar, 445
overrun, effects and handling of, 480 command prefixed
with "In auditing has there been
overrun of non-basic, 474 an/a ," 170
Past Life Remedies, 232 command prefixed with "In your
last session did
pc doesn't know if it's erasing or going more solid,
you have an/a ," 171
handling, 384, 392 commands, 446
piling up mass by running several engrams through crossed
ruds, pc answers PTPs with ARC breaks etc,,
once, 71 handling, 170
postulate off equals erasure, 384, 391, 480 C/Sing ruds,
165
procedure for getting erasure, 131, 384, 391, 480
definition, 425, 445
procedure for narrative running, 385, 393 definitions
and patter, 445
procedure step by step, 381, 390 Dianetic auditor does not
have to know how to do, 76
program outline in full for NED, 360 dictum of using no
O/W processes in, 4
protest vs, interest in R3RA, 388 dirty needle caused by
trying to clean off prior reads
PTPs and, 67 in, 6
pushing pc earlier after he has given the postulate,
doesn't F/N, reason, 445
effects of, 480 doing GF if no F/N on ruds, 166
reason item must be mentioned in the command to double
questioning any ruds question causes dirty
the pc, 130 needle, 6
recognizing when you hear a postulate, 480 earlier
similar rule, 445
results and, 75 EP, 449
returning pc to the incident, 343 False button, use of, 449
rote chant vs, understanding procedure, 81 false read
handling, 38
running a narrative item by regular R3RA instead of
fly all ruds, when to C/S it, 166
by Narrative R3RA, 100 fly each rud to F/N, when
to C/S it, 166
scan through to the end of the incident is incorrect,
flying rud or ruds if no F/N, 445
343 fly the ruds to F/N, when to C/S it, 165
secondaries, handling of, 387, 394 F/N, getting the,
445
service fac handling with R3RA, 466 high or low TA and,
449, 450
situations the auditor should know how to handle, 496
high TA and, 38, 167, 449, 450
speed of commands, 388 if not cleared on itsa get the basic
on the chain, 38
student who is so dedicated to the exact words, 81 key-out
and, 47
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
rudiment(s) (cont.) running item(s) (cont.)
life knocking ruds out faster than they can be audited
order of handling items, 487
in, handling, 128 order of handling reads, 355
light use of, 165 preassessment item, getting running
items from, 351,
list correction and, 44 352
Model Session and, 450 Preassessment List used to get, 414
not tracing it down to basic when it doesn't blow, 37
procedure for obtaining, 351
not used to run the case, 445 take the best reading
item, 351
out lists vs, ARC breaks, correct lists first, 146 trying
to run unreading items, effects of, 475
out ruds; see out rudiments volunteered item, handling,
351
overrun ruds, handling, 172 running item list(s); see also
Dianetic list
patter of, 445 after the fact running items, don't
choose them, 428
prefixed with "Between sessions _," 180 doing a
preassessment on the same original item and
protest and, 38 then a new running item list, 353
purpose of, 445 finding the next running item, 353
Q and A to date and run a secondary in ruds because
how long you continue listing, 355
of an ARC break needle, 47 laws of L&N sometimes
apply to a, 355
reads handled E/S to F/N, 445 procedure for making a,
351
references, 449 take the best reading item on, 351
Suppress and false reads, use of, 46 upset pc after
listing a running item list, handling,
Suppress button, use of, 449 355
symptoms that indicate need of, 165, 166 rush, never rush a
pc or hold him up, 388
TA going high on ruds, handling, 167 ruthless personalib, 96
theory of, 445
uses of, 165
word list for, 412 S
rundown(s),
All Flows Rundown results, 134
confidentiality of upper level RDs, 479 sad, ARC break and,
101
Dianetic Prepared Assessment RD, 396 sad effect, always check
ARC break of long duration, 39
Disability RD, 395 safe solution(s),
IV Rundown, reason it was developed, 120 evil
intention and, 462
full list of grades showing where the various RDs now is
the hole out of which sanity drains, 462
offered fit, 227 service fac and, 456
Identity Rundown, 357 Saint Hill Special Briefing Course,
materials added to,
Injury Rundown, 153 293
"L" series of RDs restricted to Flag, 287 salt, Sweat Program
and, 325, 340
Management Word Rundown, programming of, 129 S&D; see Search and
Discovery
NED for OTs, development of, 482 sane, sanib; see also insanity
out of valence handling with Class VIII rundown, general
motive or purpose determines whether or not
152 he is insane or sane, 313
Relief Rundown, 400 rest helps result in a return to, 56
Resistive Case Rundown, 119 safe solution is the hole out
of which sanity drains, 462
steps for getting in ethics on a staff member, 209 service
fac running-the sanity level, 468
study rundowns require C/S OK, 129 truth is sanity,
214
unissued rundowns, 287 scanning, reason it isn't used in engram
running, 343
running, Sweat Program and, 325 schedule, scheduling,
running item(s); see also Dianetic item Dianetics Course and, 74
after the fact item defined, 428 scheduling sessions
closer together and giving long
after the fact items, examples, 78, 428 sessions
so life hasn't a chance to interfere, 128
command for checking interest in the, 353 why D of P
becomes incapable of getting auditors
command for listing for, 351 to audit per the, 213
definition, 351 scholarships, Paid Comps and, 316
drilling listing for a, 87 school experiences, auditing out
unhappy, 66
example, 351, 352, 416 science, how we could lose an entire
subject, 118
example of getting running items from a preassess-
Scientologists, pc has done something harmful to Scien ment
item, 351, 352 tologists, handling, 156
example of how a typical Dianetic chain might run, Scientology,
416 addresses the thetan, 68
finding the next running item, 353 critical of
Scientology and M/W/Hs, 3
general type item vs,, 351 C/Sing Dianetics vs,, 68
instant F/N and, 351, 355, 487 definition, 422
interest in an item, command to check for, 351
definition of "a goal which is an overt against Scien largest
reading item is chosen, 353 tology," 8
largest reading items are ones pc can most easily Dianetic
result sometimes attained with, 68
confront, 355 Dianetics vs,, 58, 60, 65, 68
listing for, 351 EP of Scientology processes, 451
locating items to run, 396 establishing whether a person
will attempt to ruin or
medical terms were put on the running item list,
stop Scientology, 8
handling, 76 high TA in, 71
noting reads while pc is giving items, 352, 438 how we
are making all our own trouble, 5
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Scientology (cont.) Securib Check(s)(ing) (cont.)
how we could lose an entire subject, 118 tech
correction round-up data concerning, 278
immortal being and, 68 unwarranted Sec Checks, symptoms and
handling of,
mixing Dianetics and, 68, 76 188
never run a Scientology grade to make a pc well, 67
what the loss of Sec Checking would do to our
organization; see organization churches and orgs,
278
pc has done something harmful to Scientology, hand- see,
people with out-ethics withholds cannot see, 208
ling, 156 Self Anabsis, unburdening cases with, 234
playing Scientology auditing against NED, 83 self-auditing,
results, 68 detection and handling of, 128
Scientology F/N and TA position, 260 due to auditor
scarcity or some introverting shock,
"secret" of producing high case gain and total results
128
with NED and, 108 Solo and, 113
staff; see staff self-listing,
technology; see technology due to no item found, 308
vanishing from Man's view, reason for, 5 recognition
and handling of, 308
workability of, 34 usual reason for, 308
Scientology CS-1; see also Dianetic CS-1 Senior Case Supervisor,
clearing commands is not precluded by, 421 Dean of
Technology, 285
clearing words on correction lists and, 421 duties of,
285
dictionaries and materials needed for a, 418 requirements
for the post, 285
procedure, 419 Senior Class IV, materials added to, 293
procedure for clearing words, 418 sensation(s); see also pain;
somatic
purpose of, 418 classifications of, 10
R-Factor, 419 combination terminal and, 12
Search and Discoveg; see also PTS Rundown definition, 10
errors, handling, 190 drugs block off all sensations, 453
ethics trouble after S&D, reason for and handling of,
only reasons for living are the sensations and joys
173 of life, 453
flubbed S&D, handling, 186 oppterm and, 11, 12
three SPs found on one list, handling, 174 sexual
sensation blocked off by drugs, 453
too many GF, Remedy Bs and S&Ds, handling, 168 sensitivity,
secondary, secondaries; see also death; losses F/Ns and, 280
assist handling of secondaries, 218 F/Ns missed due to
sensitivity too high, 265
definition, 59, 410 one-hand electrode and, 48, 72
Q and A to date and run a secondary in ruds because
setting sensitivity by can squeeze, 280, 323, 382, 440
of an ARC break needle, 47 sentences, using the word in,
334, 404, 418, 443
Routine 3RA handling of, 387, 394 service(s),
study and, 110 Major Processing Service defined, 316
three-way or quad secondaries on drugs, 176 Major
Training Service defined, 316
second dynamic, irregular 2D connections and prac- Minor
(Division 6) Services defined, 317
tices, 208 package sales and Paid Comps, 317
Second Original Assessment, 401 service facsimile(s),
security, anatomy of, 456
Advance Course material insecurity, cases wrecked
automaticities and, 463, 465
by, 129 automaticity, running off the, 467
new security program, 9 central service fac, 462
Security Check(s)(ing); see also Confessionals; Integrity
definition, 456
Processing Dianetic Clear and service fac handling,
463, 465
are no substitute for auditing or guarantee of inno- EP
of service fac running, 468
cence, 227 evil intentions and, 461
audits the case at cause, 305 finding the, 466
establishing whether a person will attempt to ruin or
freedom of choice destroyed by, 458
stop an org, Scientology or auditor, 8 he is
generating it, 458
HCOB, 8 how he first gets it, 456
Integrity Processing, Confessionals and, 278 how it
becomes fixed, 457
List One R/S, verification of, 231 indicators that
you've found one, 462, 467
long duration Sec Checking shows up R/Sers, 311
inspection is forbidden by, 462
misnamed in its origins, 278 isn't a facsimile, 461
more properly called Confessionals, 278 it lives pc's
life for him, 458
must be included in pc's folder, 256 it's intended not
accidental, 461
new security program, 9 listing for the, 464, 466
no overts person, 311 main core service fac, recognizing
it, 468
no TA on a Sec Check, what it means, 39 many service
facs add up to the big one, 462
programming and, 305 more than one per pc, 462
R/Sers and, 240 NED service fac handling, 463
R/Sers do not R/S necessarily on casual brief Sec overts
and, 461
Checks, 311 power destroyed by, 458
R/Ses easily turn on during, 240 Prepchecks and, 467
shallow wishy-washy "overts" coming off, 311 procedure for
handling, 464
soft-spoken quiet "inoffensive" person and, 311 reason
it isn't rational, 457
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
service facsimile(s) (cont.) session(s) (cont.)
references, 456, 461, 463 scheduling sessions closer
together and giving long
Routine 3RA, handling of, 466 sessions so life
hasn't a chance to interfere, 128
R/Ses and, 461 session ARC breaks because of list
errors, 192
R/Ses handled with service fac processing, 462 session
ARC breaks, checking for, 47
safe solution and, 456 setting up for the, 450
switcheroo, 461 setting up the room and session, 381
TA action in service fac handling, 457 spare meter in
session, 323
why it does not respond to ordinary auditing, 462 start of
session; see start of session
why it is called that, 456 TA rising between sessions, 38
session(s), textbook session and pc gains, 3
anaten in session, handling, 433 terxtbook session is
particularly required by raw
ask for M/W/Hs when sessions go wrong, 5 meat, 7
asking pc what the auditor did, 94, 100, 102, 144, 147
tone of the session is set by the auditor, 3
auditing environment is auditor's responsibility, 196
TRs are how one runs a, 141
auditing out sessions, 58, 79, 156 "well done" when to
give one in Dianetics, 85
auditing out sessions, references, 364 when you run into a
snag you can't handle, 36
auditing session is 50% technology and 50% appli- why pcs
don't come back into session with an F/N, 42
tion, 2 set, keeping the needle on, 280
bad session last time, handling, 171 set-up(s),
B, given to pc before session, 175 Ex Dn set-ups
checklist, 225
breaks; see breaks FESer's duty to indicate if pc made
last grades and is
checklist for setting up sessions, 322 set up for
next grade, 283
correcting a bad session, 75 F/N, major actions and,
38
definition, 409, 422 Power Checklist, 302
differentiating between a problem that concerns pc Solo set-
ups, 227, 228
and an effort to blow session, 162 sex, sexual,
difficult session, reason for, 3 alcohol use and sexual
perversions or promiscuity,
dirty needle caused by failure to use a textbook
175
session, 6 drugs and sexual sensation, 105
dirty needle caused by using a scruffy and ragged drugs
block off sexual sensation, 453
session pattern, 6 sexual sensation defined, 10
distractions; see distractions shock(s),
end of session; see end of session assist handling of
shocks, 218
extra meter lead needed, 323 assists and emotional
shock, 217
failed sessions due to lack of speed, 94 introverting
shock causing self-auditing, 128
failures in Dianetics, four main reasons, 100 pc in
recent shock of having died, handling, 233
forgetting the commands during session, handling, 86 shock
treatment(s), electric shock(s),
getting sessions monitored, 144 electric shock prolongs
the condition, 56
heavy session ARC breaks without explanation, hand-
illegal pcs and, 259
ling, 173 is a Nuremberg type offense, 55
in session; see in session is depersonalization
treatment, 84
interruptions, prevention of, 322 never understanding
psychosis led to, 313
L1C when session blows up, 250 R/Ses buried by, 241
long sessions and resistive case, 181 shoes tight causing false
TA, 197, 266, 272
major action of the session, 450 shut-offs, somatic, emotional
and perceptic shut-offs, 361
material needed in a session, 322 sickness; see illness
Model Session procedure, 450 significance(s),
monitoring sessions, 255 force connected with, 487
never tell pc he will have another session in session, 39
moving the time track by significance, 25
nine things that can go wrong in a NED session, 100
postulates and engrams, 332
no alcohol may be consumed within 24 hours before seeking
the significance in what the artist meant, 320
an auditing session, 106 simple, anything truly
powerful is truly simple, 81
not OK to call pc's attention to his hands, TA, or Single
Dianetics,
meter during session, 235 procedure for getting in
all flows, 133
other types of "sessions" such as psychoanalysis, 79
what happens if Dianetics was run single and grades
out of session; see out of session are run
triple, 132
parts of a, 81 what happens when a flow not run on
earlier items is
pc attempting to leave session, 3 run on later items,
132
pc hard to handle in session, handling, 166 Single Grades never
should have been abandoned, 307
pc is seated in the chair furthest from the door, 381
sinusitis, Dianetics and, 70
pc tends to take over session, handling, 166 skill, auditing
skill remains only as good as student can
pc too hot, handling, 272 do his TRs, 157
pc who compares Scientology sessions to former drug skin
blotches and Dianetics, 66
trips, 176 sleep; see also rest; tiredness
reasons Dianetic session does not complete with auditing
a pc on no sleep, 37
VGIs, 99 checking pc for adequate sleep, 323
rough, angry ARC breaky session is auditor's fault, 2
don't audit pc who has not had sufficient rest, 272
running out bad sessions using R3RA, 58 making pc
walk away until he is tired and then walk
running out previous auditing, 156 back and get
some sleep, 125
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
sleep (cont.) solution(s) (cont.)
pc sleeps too much, handling, 177 safe solution, 456, 462
pc who can't get rest, handling, 125 unusual solution;
see unusual solution
snide personality, 96 somatic(s); see also pain; sensation
social machinery and OCA graph, 152 audit pc on NED until no
somatics, 117
social personality, increasing it, 251 chronic somatic; see
chronic somatic
society, composite somatic, 92
study tech is our bridge to, 203 constant recurring
somatic and PTS, 50
well and happy society, 85 definition, 10, 60, 62, 353
solid, solidify, solidity, drugs and, 105
assuming one always asks "solid or erasing," 80 effect
of running several somatic chains without eras bank getting more solid
due to reckless or continuous ing any, 71
rehab of a past major action, 132 handling
somatics with R3RA, 353
bank gone solid, handling, 179 HCOB on, 10, 69
definition of solid, 411 narrative vs, somatic chains,
79
demonstration of "going more solid," 406 Preassessment
List is designed to locate, 353
earlier incident, indicator of, 474 reason for staying
on the chain of only one somatic
engrams, masses feel too solid to pc, handling, 179
in Dianetics, 62
how to solidify pc's bank by putting him through an
recurring somatics, references, 122
incident twice, 384, 392 shut-offs, 361
how to tell if it is going more solid, 61 sympathetic
nervous system pains, 122
incident gone more solid, handling, 136 taking
narrative items and running them as somatic
never ask "solid or erasing" if TA starts to climb, 80
chains, 108
overrun of basic making the picture more solid, 474
unresolved pains, two reasons for, 122
overrun of non-basic, 474 sonic, R3RA develops sonic, 381
pc doesn't know if it's erasing or going more solid,
soporifics 104
handling, 384, 392 SP, see suppressive person
pc saying "it was getting more solid" to escape each space,
going straight to a person's handling of masses
incident, 102 and changes of space with
Confessionals, 297
smooth Dianetic auditor never increases solidib of Special
Cases, do not state Resistive Cases but Spe
TA rising means incident has gone more solid, 61,
cial Cases, 181
383, 391 speed,
the later he is in incidents and on the track the more
auditing speed, 94
solid he is, 133 failed sessions due to lack of
speed, 94
when an incident grows more solid, 474 lack of speed in
giving commands, 100
Solo (auditing)- see also Advanced Courses slow auditor,
handling, 94
actions a Solo auditor may and may not do, 127 why
speed and accuracy is the stress of all training 94
attestation, when to permit it, 113 splrlt; see also being;
thetan
auditor keeps the back of his hand on his leg while
assist is entirely in the field of the, 217
auditing and current gives a tingle to the leg, 195
Dianetic results are achieved by addressing and hand auditor who
"attests" rather than confront his bank, ling the, 360
145 spook, definition, 201
auditor who never learned to use his tools, 145 squirrel(s),
squirrelling,
cognitions, what they depend upon, 145 case who invites
many to squirrel, 83
confidential and AO lists, 251 C/S that dreams things
up, 85
Dianetic Clear, auditing of, 117 definition of squirrel
(verb), 94
double folder danger, 115 stable datum,
failures, reason for and remedy of, 145 adopted in
lieu of inspection, 457
marking TA readings from a one-hand electrode, 195 how it
becomes fixed, 457
one-hand electrode; see one-hand electrode safe solution
and, 456
OT VIII is a Solo level, 482 substituting an idea for
a thetan, 457
person is not issued what he will audit on until he has staff,
completed the study pack, 112 basic Why of post
non-performance, 203
requisites for the Solo Course R6EW, 113 care of staff
through training and processing, 286
results, what they depend on, 113 certain staff courses
made mandatory, 286
Routine 3R may not be attempted in Solo auditing, co-
audits for, 287
127 how to clear up an org or area where Cramming
Offi Routine 6EW and, 112 cers have been messing it up,
345
self-auditing and, 113 it ill behooves any of us to talk
about the rest of us,
set-ups for, 227, 228 478
Solo Assists, 127 jokers and degraders, 291
there are no Solo Repair or Progress or Return or List One
R/Sers and, 231
Advance Programs, 127 old poem, an, 478
training the Solo student needs, 113 penalty for failure
to employ study tech, 203
two-way comm actions as Solo are forbidden, 127 penalty
for going by MUs in despatches or telexes, 221
whatthetroublesonSolocoursesare, 112 persons whose
ethics have remained out must be
solution(s), replaced, 207
problems pc is trying to solve with processing, hand-
pick up the M/W/Hs when staffs go wrong, 5
ling, 156 prepared lists for use on, 251
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
staff (cont.) statistic(s), stat(s) (cont.)
RPF and, 478 downstat area, handling, 207
R/Sers are high risks for staff purposes, 229 DTS's
stat, 214, 276
Staff Section Officer and, 286 executive's duty to
investigate downstat areas, 207
steps for getting in ethics on, 209 F/N VGIs ratio
stat, 317
Staff Section Officer, establishment of the, 286 Major
Training Service defined, 316
Staff Statuses, routing forms and, 286 package sales and Paid
Comps, 317
Shge 4 "float," detecting a, 47 Paid Completions simplified,
316
standard(ness), penalty for C/S or auditor who falsifies a, 202
case gain and, 85 prosperity of a group, what it
depends on, 209
confidence of pc comes up by establishing a standard
Qual Div, dominant stat of, 286
of excellence pc can predict, 7 underlying ethics
situation causing the administrative
confidence of pc lies in how standard the auditor is, 3
Why not to function or raise stats, 207
dictatorial martinet precision in requiring standard
"Value of Services Delivered" stat, 276
auditing, 83 WDAHs is the second D of P stat, 214
non-standardness only once in a hundred will give a
Word Clearer's stat, 280
case gain, 83 stimulus-response, reactive mind and, 408
value of a Case Supervisor depends on unfailing stomach
upsets, vitamins and, 339
adherence to standard actions, 85 stress)es),
standard tech(nology), assist handling of stresses, 218
arbitraries and, 33 psychic trauma erased speeds
recovery, 354
complete an auditing cycle once begun, 115 purely
physical facts of, 216
definition, 33 stuck (picture),
HCOB on, 38 children get stuck in the books and
movies they see,
percentage of successes of, 34 233
quality of technology, what determines it, 34 handling
by asking him to recall a time before the
teaching of standard tech must be standard, 74
incident and then after it, 219
what VIII standardization aimed at, 119 handling (in
Dianetics), 139
Start Change Stop, automaticity of pictures handled by, how you
get pc stuck up on the track in R3RA, 388
434 pc stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or
books,
start of session, handling, 234
asking for any reason not to begin session, 323 thetans
copying or picturing incidents and then get asking pc "Have you been
taking any drugs or as- ting stuck in the later
portion of them, 132
pirin?" 106 student(s); see also study; training
checklist for setting up sessions and an E-Meter, 322
application; see application
don't rehab on a high TA at session start, 38 blown
student, handling, 111, 250, 284
flying a rud or ruds if no F/N, 445 Course Supervisor
checking students on a meter for
high or low TA and, 449, 450 misunderstoods, 149
high TA at start in Dianetics, handling, 130 Dianetic
Student Rescue Intensive, 111, 399
metabolism test to check that pc has had enough to doping
off students, handling, 111
eat, 382 examinations must not be discussed by, 32
mixing starts, 147 failed examinations and, 32
procedure and patter, 382 F/Ning student, 149
procedure in Model Session, 450 goofing student is being
complex, 81
ruds, theory of, 445 guarantee of successful application
by the, 73
starting a new session with a new item with the TA having
real trouble on a course, handling, 251
way way up, 130 penalty for advocating a misuse or
neglect of proper
"This is the session" (Tone 40), 382 study tech,
203
why pcs don't come back into session with an F/N, physical
punishment of, 110
42 prepared lists for use on, 250
state(s); see also levels prepared lists include anything that
could happen to
pc attained some state and it was invalidated, hand-
a pc or, 248
ling, 140 questions by the student, handling, 74
two states of humanly tolerable and spiritually im-
raising quality and speed in study, 149
proved, 217 rebellious student, handling, 291
statement(s), revolutionary student, cure of, 250
asking the question as a question, not a statement of
slow students, handling, 111
fact, 355 slow students on Data Series Course,
handling, 251
assessing with a statement's vs, a questioning tone of
steps to speed student product flow, 149
voice, 430 Student Rescue Intensive, 110
calling items to pc as questions, not as statements, 345
things student is weak on are done in clay, 74
voice tone rises on a question and goes down on a those
who should be sold a Student Rescue Inten statement, 355
sive, 111
State of Case Scale, 27 tone level during study related to
misunderstoods, 149
statistic(s), stat(s), who become upset by study, handling, 111
auditors stats may only be hours audited, 214 who
feels he has been incorrectly failed on an exam completed
intensives stat defined, 214 ination, 32
declining stats and jokers and degraders, 291 who is
so dedicated to the exact words (in R3RA), 81
delivery stats Why, 253 who try to blow, handling, 111
D of P's stats, 214, 276 Student Correction List, use of, 250
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Student Hat (Course), sugar,
Basic Study Manual vs,, 283 Sweat Program and, 339
NED and, 358 221/2 % recover on sugar pills, 34
Student Rehabilitatlon List, use of, 250 suicide, Man's tendency
toward 4th dynamic suicide, 312
Student Rescue Intensive; see also Dianetic Student Suppress
button,
Rescue Intensive command to put in Suppress button,
449
HCOB on, 110 getting in ruds with Suppress and False,
170
is not a substitute for Word Clearing, 111 item
suppressed (in Dianetics) handling, 139
procedure, 110 putting in Suppress and false reads on
each rud, 46
programming of, 111 putting in Suppress and Protest on
an area of interest
which students should receive one, 111 in Dianetics
that hasn't read, 103
study(ing); see also courses; student; training "Since last
session has anything been suppressed?"
application; see application 180
can't study, handling, 83 use in ruds, 449
C/Sing or auditing without folder study, 202 use of
Suppress and False if pc edgy about ruds, 165
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive, 111, 399 using
Suppress on a "clean" read, 166
drugs and study inability, 363 suppression,
drugs are a probable contributory cause to being assists
and handling the presence of, 219
unable to study, 111 mistakes or accidents or
injuries occur in the pres engrams, secondaries and, 110
ence of, 219
falsifying study leads to falsifying meters, 200 suppressive
person(s); see also psychotic; rock slammer
handling person who won't study, 251 declared SP for
repeated violations of study tech, 204
inability to study, what underlies it, 83 false
auditing reports and, 255
interpretation or addition by the student, 74
materials on L&N, PTS and SP tech added to Level
losses, physical pains and, 110 IV, 293
NED auditor study difficulties, handling, 499 out of
valence and, 96, 152
number of times over the material equals certainty PTS
person must have been out-ethics toward the,
and results, 73 208
penalty for neglecting to clarify words not under- R/Ser
and, 229
stood, 203 survival, survive,
prepared lists for use on students, 250 he can't do
anything else except survive, 458
PTSes handled by studying PTS/SP Checksheet, 246 in order
to survive you have to be right, 457
raising quality and speed in, 149 insistence upon survival,
followed by the necessity to
Student Rescue Intensive, 110 dominate, 457
study rundowns require C/S OK, 129 obsession to be
right in order to survive, 458
tone level during study related to misunderstoods, 149
point where you degenerate from survive to succumb,
Study Series 7, use of, 251 457
study tech, right/wrong, dominate and survive, 457
Axiom 28 and, 204 sweat(ing)(y),
Basic Study Manual vs, Student Hat, 283 E-Meter and,
71
blows caused by lack of, 284 holding cans so tight it
caused pc's hands to sweat,
cleared word defined, 334 265
declared SP for repeated violations of, 204 low TA caused
by sweaty hands, 195, 199
definitions, which ones to clear in W/Cing, 334 meter
does not work on, 195, 222
ethics and, 203 mineral supply depleted by sweating, 324
is our bridge to society, 203 sweat suits and sweating,
341
is the basic prevention of out tech and out admin, 204
sweaty hands, handling, 195
penalty for failure to employ it, 203 Sweat Program,
penalty for neglecting to clarify words not under-
addition, 327
stood, 203 Angel Dust and, 106, 361
post and, 221 auditing the pc while on the, 327
tech correction round-up data concerning, 283 Cal-Mag
and, 325, 340
violations of study tech, effects of and penalties for,
can be done before DRD or Objectives, 326, 327
221 characteristics of the LSD case, 315
stupid(ity), diet, 325
blowing through stupidity on the Sweat Program, 326
Drug RD and, 315, 324, 327
drugs render thetan stupid, 105 enteric coated vitamins
and, 339
LSD case and, 315 EP, 341
not knowingness and, 299 exercise and, 325
overts causing, 299 fat, reducing body fat, 325
withholds add up to, 299 flour and, 339, 341
subjects, probable fate of all subjects, 380 further data, 339
successes, how to achieve technical successes, 273 gradient and,
324, 341
success stog, lack of proper success story points to out heart
conditions and, 341
tech, 254 high blood pressure and, 341
succumb, how the original Sweat Program was run, 339
beginning of succumb, 457 idea that underlies the, 324
point where you degenerate from survive to, 457 if
person does not feel better after 3 or 4 weeks, 340
R/S and, 231 introduction of, 315
to get someone to succumb they have to be wrong, jogging
gradient for, 341
461
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Sweat Program (cont.) technology, technical (cont.)
jogging with another person, 325 changes in methods,
reason for, 380
kidney conditions and, 341 Dean of Technology, 285
lack of a Sweat Program doesn't stop other auditing,
"doesn't work," handling, 255
326, 327 ethics and study tech, 203
LSD and, 106, 324, 327 forbidden to write an HCOB or HCO PL
and sign
medical doctor permission to do it, 324 LRH's
name to it, 274
no further changes occurring, 341 getting in ethics and
tech before you can get in ad normal weight people and, 339
min, 292
overweight people and, 339 how we could lose an entire
subject, 118
poisons will be flushed out, 324 I am responsible for the
technology, auditor is re potassium and, 340
sponsible for the application, 2
potassium depletion, symptoms of, 340 idea that the "old"
is always cancelled by anything
potassium gluconate tablets and, 340 "new," 118
predigested protein and, 340 in-tech, the only way to
achieve it, 273
programming of, 361 interpreting the tech, 275
program oddity, 341 LRH recovering lost tech, 380
protein and, 340 misapplications of NED, handling the
auditor, 492
reactions that one can undergo on the, 326 no BTB may
cancel an HCOB, 274
reason it came about, 324 others introducing unworkable
changes, 380
references, 339 out tech; see out tech
results of, 326 preventing unauthorized use or misuse of
upper level
rubberized nylon sweat suit used, 325 materials,
479
salt and, 324 probable fate of all subjects, 380
salt depletion, indicators of, 324, 340 quality,
improvement of, 342
salt is not mandatory on, 340 quality, what
determines it, 34
shoes for jogging, 340 standard tech; see standard tech
steps, 325 study tech; see study tech
substituting a more basic nutritional, medical and tech
correction round-up, 274
auditing program, 324 technical breakthroughs in
A,D, 28, 482
sugar and, 339, 341 Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and
Scientology,
sweat suit, when to start wearing it, 341 The, 237
trips during the program, handling, 339 technical
successes, how to achieve, 273
underweight people and, 339 22~/2 % recover on sugar
pills, 34
use of, 361 unissued rundowns, 287
vegetables and, 340 variables, 148
vitamins and minerals, 325 verbal tech is no substitute
for HCOBs, 281
who it would be for, 324 what makes tech correct, 275
yoghurt taken with the vitamins, 339 when tech doesn't
get results it isn't correct, 275
sympathetic nervous system pains, 122 workability of, 34
symptom(s); see also indicators Tech Senices,
chart of symptoms (Case Supervisor Actions HCOB), auditors
picking and choosing pcs, 213
163 HGC Pc Application Form and, 331
main complaints and symptoms of pcs, 360 right to
assign pcs without a lot of pick and choose
by auditors, 213
stat of the DTS, 214, 276
T teeth; see tooth
telepathic awareness that the incident was
going to
occur, 400
TA; see tone arm telexes, going by MUs in, 221
talcum powder, temperature,
dry and wet hands make false TA, 222 audit a person
running a fever lightly, 186
high TA caused by too much, 222 persistent temperature,
handling, 153
making meter read falsely high with, 201 Temperature
Asslst(s),
talk(ing), reference, 220
"all auditors talk too much," 380 Version A, 153
half ack encourages pc to continue talking, 160 Version
B, 154
it ill behooves any of us to talk about the rest of us,
terminal(s),
478 combination terminal and, 11
over-acknowledgement stops a pc from talking, 160
definition, 10
pc refusing to talk to auditor, 3 evil intention and, 461
tapes are gone through in the sequence laid down by GPMs
and, 10
the checksheet, 74 HCOB on, 10
taping sessions to detect false auditing reports, 255 method
of testing for, 12
Team, results and, 85 obsessive individuation causing one to
snap in and
Tech Estlmator, HGC Pc Application Form and, 331 become
the, 297
technology, technlcal; see also materials opposition
terminal; see opposition terminal
all comes from HCOBs, tapes, books, 33 pain is produced
by, 10
application; see application pain is turned on by, 12
auditing session is 50% technology and 50% applica-
R/Ses and, 11
tion, 2 rule for listing a, 12
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
terminai(s) (cont.) time track(s) (cont.)
Tiger Drill buttons and, 12 dub-in and, 27
ways of asking for, 12 dub-in of dub-in and, 27
testing, HGC Pc Application Form and, 330 experiential track
of R/Ser, 230
theory, handling of time on pc's time track, 25
courses and, 328 handling the, 25
interneships are not where you learn theory, 328 how you
get pc stuck up on the track in R3RA, 388
is never in the same room with practical, 284
invisible track and State of Case Scale, 27
preventing too much theory on interneships, 329 is
created by an involuntary response of the thetan, 29
room must be quiet, 284 late things hang up where
earlier like things exist, 428
twinning on theory, reason it was cancelled, 284
precision of the, 26
therapy, former; see former therapy reason for reducing the
charge on the, 25
theta, returning a thetan's causation over the,
29
definition, 408 State of Case Scale and, 27
raising of theta perception, 482 the later he is in
incidents and on the track the more
theta bop, solid he is, 133
definition, 238 three ways to move it about, 25
demonstrating one on a meter with no pc or cord
watchwords of dating and time track handling, 26
connected, 239 tired(ness); see also rest; sleep
don't ever indicate theta bops, 239 blunted purpose
and, 41, 177
F/N differentiated from, 239 don't audit physically
tired pc, 272
R/S differentiated from, 238 handling by running
blunted purpose, 177
thetan(s) see also being; case; preclear; spirit high TA
caused by auditing pc when too tired, 124
ability to inspect becoming less and less, reason, 457
M/W/H and, 41
copying or picturing incidents and then getting stuck pc
who can't get rest, handling, 125
in the later portion of them, 132 symptoms of,
177
definition, 408, 423 tone arm,
destructive vs, constructive basic purpose, 313 big can
vs, small can TA readings, 195
drugs drag thetan into heavily creating, 176 climbs when
F/N is overrun or missed, 48
effect of drugs on, 105, 176 conditions that make an
auditor mess up a pc's TA,
engrams are what overwhelms the, 29 223
first and second mistake of a, 30 dead bodies read between
2,0 and 3,0, 199
he can't do anything else except survive, 458 depends
on normally moist hands, 222
is incident hungry, 132 false TA; see false TA
is the "I," 408 floating TA, description, 197
massy thetans, 132 high TA; see high TA
"mystery sandwich" and, 219 low TA; see low TA
old poem, an, 478 marking TA readings from a one-hand
electrode, 195
Operating Thetan; see Operating Thetan measures mental
mass, 80
predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of not OK
to call pc's attention to his hands, TA, or
injury and illness, 216 meter during
session, 235
returning a thetan's causation over the time track, 29
one-hand electrode and, 93, 195, 282
Scientology addresses the, 68 pc gone into despair over
his TA, handling, 273
substituting an idea for a, 457 pcs who falsify TA or
F/Ns, 198
the later he is in incidents and on the track the more
resistance, E-Meter and, 260
solid he is, 133 rising TA means incident has gone
more solid (in
what Man does when he finds he is being too destruc-
Dianetics), 61, 383, 391
tive, 313 Scientology F/N and TA position, 260
what traps a, 132 what TA depends upon, 260
when the individual is no longer able to select his
why the TA rises, 71
own course of behavior, 458 tone arm action, tone arm
motion,
think, can't think brightly, handling, 251 Dianetic auditor is
not concerned with, 474
Tiger Drill buttons, using, 12 no TA on a Sec Check, what it
means, 39
tight clothes, handling, 272 Original Assessment Sheet and, 367
tight shoes and false TA, 197, 268, 272 Scientology audits by the
amount of TA, 474
time, service fac handling and, 457
handling of time on pc's time track, 25 tone arm motion;
see tone arm action
is the single source of aberration, 25 tone level(s),
present time; see present time misunderstoods vs, tone
level during study, 149
time limiter, Prepchecking and, 469 Tone Scale position, what
determines it, 439
time track(s), what happens as tone goes lower, 439
bulk of the charge lies in engrams, 29 tone of voice; see voice
charge and the, 27 Tone Scale,
charge is the sole thing being removed by the auditor
ability to reach determines position on, 439
from the, 27 illustrated in full, 193
charge submerges the time track from view, 28 tooth, teeth,
commands for moving a time track about, 26 bursting
feelings in, 123
composition of, 29 decay and, 123
definition, 61 persisting tooth trouble, NED handling
of, 123
drugs, you can always find more drugs on the track,
toothache(s),
484 handling toothache that does not resolve, 123
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
toothache(s) (cont.) treason, person in treason on Ist dynamic is
out of
persisting tooth trouble, NED handling of, 123
valence, 97
sympathetic nervous system pains and, 123 treatment; see
medical treatment
Touch Assist(s), trim (knob), trimmed, trimming,
checking for overrun, 151 checking the trim in mid-
session, 269
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears may receive, 215 false TA
by throwing the trim knob off, 199
EP of, 151 false TA due to improperly trimmed meter, 194
F/N and, 218 improperly trimmed meter gives false TA,
269
handling something around the head, 153 leaving meter
on a minute or two before trimming,
head somatic also sticks in the spine, 153 269
how it permits healing to occur, 55 procedure for
checking trim, 77, 194
how long to do one, 218 reason meter should be left on
a minute or two before
interrupting a general course of auditing, handling,
trimming, 194
128 temperature changes making E-Meters go out of
mandatory to take pc to Examiner afterwards, 129
trim, 77
medical treatment now working because of, 65 Triple Dianetlcs,
no F/N, handling, 151 missing flows, running of, 133
operation should be followed by, 65 rehabs, 133
pain gets stopped in the nerves, 122 reruns, 132
references, 151 what happens when a flow not run on
earlier items
sympathetic nervous system pains and, 122 is run
on later items, 132
theory of, 55 Triple Grades,
theory of what an assist is doing, 217 Quad Grades
restored, 307
workability of "laying on of hands," 55 what happens
if Dianetics was run single and grades
worksheet is required, 129 were run triple, 132
toxic subshnces lodged in body fat, handling, 361 trips during the
Sweat Program, handling, 339
track; see time track trouble(s), difficulb; see also complaints
train(ed)(ing); see also checkouts; course; Course Super-
handling zones of difficulty with Confessionals, 298
visor; drills; interneship; practical; student; study;
how we are making all our own trouble, 5
theory; TRs NED auditor not having good success
with NED,
application; see application handling, 492
biggest failure in training auditors, 63 makes trouble
for auditors, handling, 181
Dianetic auditor requires a month to train, 66 pc who
has trouble needs training, 117
end of endless training, breakthrough, 483 student
having real trouble on course, handling, 251
fast courses, 483 what a difficulty given by pc on
Original Assessment
forbidden to run new techniques without being prop-
is composed of, 353
erly trained and certified, 483 where trouble a C/S
is running into comes from, 144
four weeks or less to train a NED auditor, 483 TRs,
how do you know what good auditing is unless you're
are how one runs a session, 141
trained?, 285 assessment TRs, 430
how you get a course text weighing one ton, 80 auditing
skill remains only as good as student can do
Major Training Service defined, 316 his TRs, 157
NED command training drills, 86 bogs on TRs, handling,
336
number of times over the material equals certainty
confusions on meter, Model Session and processes
and results, 73 stemming from inability to do
TRs, 157
Paid Completions simplified, 316 daily TRs, 263
pc cannot buy training or processing due to money Debug
Assessment form, 336
troubles, handling, 179 discovering auditor
weakness or uncertainty in, 492
pc who has trouble needs training, 117 flubs in TRs are
the basis of all confusion in subse pretending training or grades
not attained, hand- quent efforts to audit, 157
ling, 181 going through TRs several times getting
tougher each
product of a course, 328 time, 162
professional rates, 284 lousy TRs causing low TA, 196
questions by the student, handling, 74 misunderstood word,
doing TRs over a, 336
schedule and Dianetic Course, 74 NED command
training drills, 86
Solo student, training of, 113 out TRs; see out TRs
teaching of basic data restimulates confusions, 74
overwhelming TRs causing low TA, 199, 201
teaching the Dianetics Course, 74 processes will not
function in the presence of bad
things student is weak on are done in clay, 74
TRs, 157
why it's cheaper to be trained, 117 reasons LRH
modernized TRs O to 4, 157
why speed and accuracy is the stress of all training, 94
reasons TRs are important, 157
TR Debug Assessment, form, 336 references, 336
trap(s); see also implants remodernized, 157
implants, degradation and entrapment, 30 speed of
auditor related to, 94
importance of obliterating entrapment activities, 30
"Two hours TRs and metering" should always be
what traps a thetan, 132 added by Cramming, 342
tranquilizer(s), withdrawal symptoms eased by, 106
delusion, how drugs produce it, 176 Word Clearers and,
263
drugs, aspirin and, 104 Word Clearing, metering and,
280
transgression, individuation and, 297 TR 0; see also confronting
translations of prepared lists, 252 commands, position,
purpose, etc,, 158
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
TR 0 (cont.) U
Confronting Bullbaited, 158
OT TR 0 commands, position, purpose, etc,, 157
reason it exists, 141 unaware, State of Case Scale and, 27
TR 1, unburden(ing),
auditor could find no item in Dianetics due to bad
definition, 62
TR 1, 102 destimulation; see destimulation
commands, position, purpose, etc,, 159 easiest way to
unburden cases, 234
must be done so pc can hear and understand auditor,
erasure and, 80
141 overburdened incident, 122
prepared lists don't work with weak TR I, 248 with
Objectives and Recall (ARC S/W, Self Anal
weekly or monthly Qual check on TR I and ability
ysis) 234
to make a question read, 263 unconscious pc, assist
handling of, 151
TR 2; see also acknowledgement underrun, handling, 171
commands, position, purpose, etc,, 159 undershnd(ing)~
must be done so that pc gets acknowledged, 141 making
fun of things one doesn't understand, 291
TR 21/2, commands, position, purpose, etc, 160 there is no
substitute for, 81, 247
TR 3, see also duplication unusual solutions vs,, 81
commands, position, purpose, etc,, 160 underweight people, Sweat
Program and, 339
reason for, 141 unflat pictures or masses, handling, 433
TR 4; see also originations universe; see physical universe
commands, position, purpose, etc,, 162 unresolving cases, 50
reason for, 141 unusual solution(s),
TR 100, commands, position, purpose, 87 auditor asking D of P for
an, 36
TR 100-A, commands, position, purpose, 87 when one will
require unusual solutions, 81
TR 101, upset(s),
commands, position, purpose, 88 due to suddenly running a
single or triple pc on
importance of, 277 quad, 434
TR 102, earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated,
handling, 138
commands, position, purpose, 88 handling of (on Original
Assessment Sheet), 155
importance of, 277 Int problems and, 249
TR 103, list errors and, 192
commands, position, purpose, 89 missed F/Ns and, 280
importance of, 277 M/W/H and, 278
TR 104, people whose ethics are low will upset a group,
208
commands, position, purpose, 89 running item list, pc
upset after listing a, 355
importance of, 277 violent session upset in Dianetics,
handling as a list
TRs 101-104, error, 192
situations auditor must know how to handle in R3RA,
wrong item and, 210
496
slow auditor handled with, 94
speeding the auditor up with, 94
TRs Course, Hard TRs Course, V
programming of, for NED, 361
public courses on TRs are not "softened," 157 valence(s),
when to send auditor to do a, 495 command (valence shifter
list question), 39
truth, definition, 63
honesty is the road to, 255 Dianetic RD to handle, 357
road to truth is begun with honesty, 214 Dynamic Sort
Out Assessment can shift valences, 251
sanity is truth, 214 out of valence; see out of valence
24 hours, repair flubbed Dianetic session or chain with- pc's own
valence in the past is a terminal, 10
in, 156 vanishing creams, 222, 235
twin(s), twinning, Vaseline Intensive Care, 235, 265, 271
practical twins are highly interchangeable, 284 vegehbles,
Sweat Program and, 340
theory room must be quiet, 284 verbal tech is no substitute
for HCOBs, 281
twinning on theory, reason it was cancelled, 284 very good
indicators; see good indicators
220H, visio, R3RA develops visio, 381
commands for running recalls and engrams, 490 Vital Info RD
not restricted to Ex Dn, 275
EP of, 96 vitamin(s),
use of, 97 are not drugs, 176
two-way communication(s), enteric coated vitamins and Sweat
Program, 339
art and, 319 stomach upsets and, 339
assists and postulate two-way comm, 218 Sweat Program
and, 325, 339
assists, two-way comm steps of, 219 Vitamin B Complex,
check for read on two-way comm subjects, 124 aids in
getting rid of LSD in the system, 339
forbidden to do two-way comm actions as Solo, 127 wet
hands caused by deficiency of, 222
M/W/H handling with, 4 Vitamin B1,
Objectives quicked with, 333 alcohol burns it up, 175
references, 472 effects of, 176
what it consists of, 4 given to pc before session, 175
which turned into a listing action, 308 reduces
obsessive create by thetan due to drugs, 176
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Vitamin C, aids in getting rid of LSD in the system, 339
withhold(s)(ing) (cont.)
voice, PTP as an indicator of, 299
ask pc the question in a questioning tone of voice,
punished for getting it off, handling, 310
430 recurring withhold defined, 310
tone of voice in assessing, 355 recurring withholds and
overts, handling, 310
tone rises on a question and goes down on a state- R/Ses
easily turn on when pulling W/Hs, 240
ment, 355 stupidity and, 299
Volunteer Minister s Handbook, The, 243 transgressions against
the mores of the group, 297
upset with getting off W/Hs or overts, handling,
310
what makes a, 297
what W/Hs add up to, 297
W wooden state due to drugs, 105
word(s); see also misunderstood word
walk, taking a walk as a remedy for pc who can't get cleared
word defined, 334
some rest, 125 penalty for neglecting to clarify
words not under
WDAHs, second D of P stat is, 214 stood, 203
well and happy pc (being), 85, 350, 353, 360, 389, 441 Word
Clearer(s),
well done, when to give one in Dianetics, 85 accumulating
misunderstood words, 335
"What are you tging to prevent?", 172 Court of Ethics for the
W/Cer if MUs are later found
whole track drugs are not asked for on Drug RD, 361, on
word cleared materials, 280
484 ethics penalty for, 335
Why(s), must have certainty that W/Cing works, 264
basic Why on W/Cing dropping out in orgs, 335 reason
they cease to be Word Clearers, 335
below administrative Whys there is usually an ethics
stat of, 280
situation, 207 Word Clearing; see also misunderstood
words
delivery stats Why, 253 Axiom 28 and, 204
major Why of bit and piece auditing, 213 cleared word
defined, 334
major Why of programs not getting finished, 213 clear
words on correction lists early in auditing, 421
major Why of 12l/2 hour intensives dropping out, 213
context of the word not given, handling, 334
out tech, basic Why of, 203 definitions, which ones to
clear, 334
post non-performance, basic Why of, 203 demonstrating
the word or item with a demo kit, 404
underlying ethics situation causing the administrative
Dianetic CS-1 procedure for clearing words, 404
Why not to function or raise stats, 207 Dianetic
remedies and, 433
Why Finding, Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive is not a
substitute
worksheets must be included in the folder, 256
for, 363
wrong items and, 256 ethics and, 264
winds of space, motion and, 10 ethics, study tech and, 203
withdrawal symptoms, TRs and Objective Processing evaluation by
telling pc what the word or command
will ease the, 106 means, 442
withhold(s)(ing); see also missed withholds failing, reasons
for W/Cing seeming to fail, 263
area or zone of difficulty in life and, 299 gains of, 264
asking for M/W/Hs vs, asking for withholds, 5 high or
low TA in W/Cing, handling, 251
assists and withhold handling, 218 how to win with,
263
audited over a withhold (in Dianetics), handling, 139
lack of impingement on metered W/Cing, effect of,
audited over withholds, handling, 102, 181 263
commands "In your last session did you have a with-
looking up words you don't understand in a defini hold?"
171 tion, 334
command prefixed with "In auditing has there been
materials on W/Cing added to Level 0 checksheets,
an/a ___," 170 293
definition, 2, 411, 426, 448 obtaining higher results
and wins with, 263
dirty needles and, 459 penalty for failure to employ study
tech, 203
evil purpose is expressed by committing harmful acts
penalty for faulty W/Cing, 264
and withholding them, 314 reasonableness about
slips and slurs or missed defini games conditions and, 297
tions on non-metered W/Cing, 263
if it still produces a dirty needle then there is more
reason it drops out in orgs, 335
to the, 460 remedy for anyone W/Ced without a
resolution of
individuations and, 297 the difficulty, 263
invalidated for getting it off, handling, 310
resistive to W/Cing, 263
moral codes and, 297 rules of clearing commands, 442
mushing engrams by pulling W/Hs, 139 Scientology CS-1
procedure for clearing words, 418
nattery pc and, 76 sentences, using the word in, 334,
404, 418, 443
no case gain by auditing over a, 126 steps to speed
student product flow, 149
not knowingness and, 298 Student Rescue Intensive is
not a substitute for, 111
"Now I'm supposed to's" and, 297 tech correction round-up
and, 280
pc generating out ruds by Iying to his NED auditor,
technical, specialized or obsolete definitions and, 334
102 TRs and metering and, 280
people with out-ethics withholds cannot see, 208 TRs and
metering in W/Cing, importance of, 263
Prepchecking "Withholds?" 170 workability of, 263
protesting getting off withholds already gotten off,
worksheets required forevery metered W/Cing action,
handling, 310 256
SUBJECT INDEX-1976/1978
Word Clearing Correction List, wrong, wrongness)es),
clear the words of the WCCL early in auditing, 443 making
the other fellow wrong in order to be right,
use of, 251 457
Word Clearing Method 1, which definitions to clear, 334 never
did anything wrong in his life, 311
Word Clearing Method 8, which definitions to clear, 334
rightness becoming wrongness, 461
word list(s), right/wrong, dominate and survive, 457
clearing words of correction lists, when to do it, 443 to
get someone to succumb they have to be wrong, 461
clear words on correction lists early in auditing, 421
total reason for an R/S is to make wrong, 461
Dianetic CS-1 word list, 412 wrong Item(s); see also L4BRA;
out lists
list of word lists for prepared lists, 252 handling, 175
L3RE word list, 413 handling (in Dianetics), 137
preassessment word list, 412 persistent item that
doesn't blow and, 39
rudiments word list, 412 sickness caused by, 114
Yellow Sheet, noting Word Cleared lists on, 443 upset
and, 210
workabillb, Why Finding and, 256
Dianetics had never been unworkable, 118 wrong way oppose,
Routine 2 and, 20
of Scientology can be shown, 34
of Word Clearing, 263
tech and, 34
worksheet(s); see also auditing reports X
if no W/S exists leave the already erased flows alone
(in Dianetics), 142 x-ray, assist and, 216
marking TA readings from a one-hand electrode, 195
neglecting to include them in the folder, 282
penalty for failing to write clearly on, 221
penalty for failure to make and include worksheets
Y
in pc's folder, 257
penalty for falsifying a, 202
reconstructing a list where there are no worksheets Yellow
Sheet, Word Cleared lists noted on, 443
308 yoghurt, Sweat Program and, 339
Sec Check actions require a, 256
Touch and Contact Assists must be done on, 129
Why Finding worksheets must be included in the
Z
folder, 256
Word Clearing actions on a meter require work
sheets, 256 0-A, 471
Word Clearing worksheets not getting in the folder, 0-B, 471
256 Zero Questions, M/W/H Prepcheck Zero Questions, 4
wrist straps, use of, 271 0-0, 471