No matching fragments found in this document.
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 2 ************************************************** The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of: 1. The Old Tech Volumes 2. The New Tech Volumes 3. Confidential Material 4. BTBs 5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech 6. Anything else appropriate that we can find They do not include a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those) b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately) Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice as much material as the old tech volumes), and because the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each year as a separate volume. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** 016 HCOPL 11 FEB 63 AUDITING REGULATIONS (OEC V4 p 426) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 FEBRUARY 1963 Sthil Students AUDITING REGULATIONS In auditing done on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, no matter what unit, the following regulations must be observed: 1. Ignorance of the student auditor of the rules of the process he is doing shall not be taken into account in any or all instances where a case is mishandled, gotten into difficulty or audited over a long period with no gain, and disciplinary measures will be taken without any attention to the student's lack of information. 2. Any student auditor, whether or not examined and passed on a technique, but doing that technique on a fellow student, and failing to achieve a result with that technique in a reasonable time, shall be transferred to W Unit, and shall have no auditing for two weeks. 3. Case responsibility shall be exclusively with the auditor and no plea that contrary data was given by an instructor or other person shall act as a defence in the event of case worsening or case difficulty. 4. If a student blows session it is wholly his or her current auditor's responsibility to retrieve that student. 5. A student receives auditing only so long as he or she gives good auditing. 6. A breach of the Auditor's Code by a student auditor just before or in session shall be deemed a misdemeanor. 7. Infractions for breach of auditing regulations may be recommended by instructors but may be given only by the Course Supervisor; the procedure being for the Instructor to pass the Infraction Sheet to the Course Supervisor for decrease, increase, cancellation or delivery to the student for the student's compliance. 8. Penalties are as follows: (a) Failure to comply with instructions which failure might have resulted in slowing or worsening a case: 200 to 500 word Infraction Sheet. (b) Departure from standard operating procedure SHSBC in any unit: 200 word Infraction Sheet to 2 weeks in Unit W. (c) Worsening or drawing out the auditing on a case: 2 weeks in Unit W to Being Sent Down. (d) Accumulation of 5,000 words in Infraction Sheets, in which 2 weeks re-assignment to Unit W shall constitute 1,500 words: No Classification during current course. ------------ These Regulations for Auditing are issued at a time when 2-12A, Rudiments and Havingness, a Prepcheck, and 3-MX are all of them highly specialized and standardized with precise rules which if exactly followed, give excellent case gains. Only departure from the standard methods of these processes can fail to achieve case gains. As the data is easily available, departures from the rules of procedure shall be interpreted as an attempted overt against the course and the pc and will be dealt with as such. Such strenuous regulations and their strenuous application are necessary if students - and you - are to leave here clear. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:gl.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 017 HCOB 11 FEB 63 CURRENT AUDITING (TV5 p. 239-40, NTV VII p. 29-31) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 FEBRUARY 1963 Franchise CenOCon CURRENT AUDITING Current Auditing has been unsettled due to the sudden breakthrough on R3-MX. What I was looking for was 1. A process that invariably cleared pcs easily; 2. That had very precise and invariable rules; 3. That could be taught by rote; and 4. Would not be subject to change. This process turned out to be R3-MX. The X at this writing is dropped as the process has proven itself and it becomes Routine 3-M. The designation of "M" is simply its consecutive letter in the development series, but it could stand for "Mary Sue" as she did the actual auditing under my direction that proved its rules. The rules of 3-MX were worked out in Routine 2-12 and 2-12A and then by examining Rocket Reading Item behavior in 3-MX. The first thing you should know about 3-M is that it is more precise in application than any process you have handled. When it says "List the Tone Arm Action out and then 25 Items more" it means exactly that. (Surges of the needle don't count in TA action as you couldn't follow them with the TA and back that fast.) When R3-M says "List 25 Items Beyond the last RR or RS on a list" it means 25, not 24. In 3-M it says Rocket Reading Item and that's what it means. And a Rocket Read is a Rocket Read not a fall. R3-M is therefore a masterpiece of precision. Do it wrong - not exactly by the rules - and it becomes a real nightmare. So know it before you do it, and do what it says only. In both R2-12A and R3-M an Item can appear anywhere on a source list so long as 2 Items do not RS or RR. One Item RSing and one RRing also means list is incomplete. On the w/w wd goal opp list (the 3-M Source List) you have to make sure list is complete to 50 Items beyond last RSing or RRing Item and 50 beyond no TA action point (where TA stops moving). This is true for both 3-M and 2-12A. You read every RRing Item back to pc from the 3-M Source List (goal opp) and every RSing Item on the 2-12A source list. A source list is of course the primary list from the goal from which you get the first RRing RI. In 2-12A the source list is what you choose to get your first list from or List One. All other lists in 3-M are extended 25 Items beyond the last RR or RS and the Item is always the last RR on the list - if not you've goofed, didn't get the TA action out of this or the just prior list. In 2-12A you go 50 Items beyond the last RS and 50 beyond the 1st still TA. The 8 tests for mass increase, etc, must be done on every Item found in 3- M and 2-12A. The best coverages of R-3M are the HCO Bulletin of Feb 1, 1963, "Routine 3", and the two hours of lecture of Feb 7, 1963, where it is covered. HCO Bulletins and other lectures will be forthcoming. R2-12A If R3-M emerges so suddenly, then what of Routine 2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A? With the single caution that you must not try to package a small RS and only use a wide RS (1/3 of a dial or more) as your source list's RI, 2-12A is very successful just as laid down. It will continue to be taught, and used. In it you have some very precise Rules. A list is continued 50 Items beyond the last RS. Never represent an RSing Item. Always carry a wide RSing RI around to a package of 4. It is not important how you get your first RI so long as it didn't come from representing an RSing Item. The last RS on the list opposing an RI is the Right Item always unless you've goofed. There must not be 2 RSing Items On a list (except List One where you choose the biggest RS as your first RI). If two appear, your list is incomplete or you let the pc (as you must never do) Represent an RR or RS he's heard or seen on the list. You don't nul in 2-12A (or 3-M), you just read the next to last, then the last RS or RR Item. Tough cases, the RS grabbed off List One Issue 3, will change with 2-12A. Rockslammers sit back and get relaxed. The process is valuable. Therefore it must be taught and used. But as R3-M is even easier than 2-12A, it also must be taught in Academies and used in HGCs. Valid Processes, then, are 1. The CCHs. 5. Prepchecking. 2. Assists. 6. Problems Intensives. 3. Ruds and Havingness. 7. R2-12A. 4. Pulling Missed W/Hs. 8. R3-M. Know these and you can crack or handle any case and clear. So know them. I'll do my best to make all the data available. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.rd Copyright $c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 018 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 V UNIT (OEC vol 4 p 427, NTV VII p. 32-34) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1963 Issue I sthil Academies V UNIT (Modifies earlier policy letters) The purpose of V Unit is to: 1. Get the student into some kind of shape to finish the course; 2. Give the student a win as an auditor; 3. Establish an auditing reality on Scientology. NEW STUDENT'S CASE If a new student has been badly audited previously, it is up to V Unit to smooth the case out. An elementary Prepcheck "In auditing _______" can be used. If the new student is a rock slammer, great care must be taken to get a 2-12A 4 RI Package on the rock slamming item. List One Issue 3 is used. The new student is not made to complete the list. The biggest R/S is found, determined as Term or Oppterm, and used. No R/Ses less than 1/3-of-a-dial wide are used in 2-12A. If the new student has been run on a wrong goal, an "On goals ______" Prepcheck or "On the goal (wrong goal) ______," should be applied. These are the only processes used in V Unit. The Instructor must not get inventive or embark upon R3 or start opposing RR RIs: 1. The assist-type repetitive Prepcheck using Suppress and Invalidate buttons only for a specific period of time contained in the command "Since ______." 2. Missed withholds. The elementary "What have we failed to find out about you." "Auditors." "I." 3. A broad Prepcheck aimed at remedying messed-up auditing. "On auditing ______" or "In auditing ______" followed by the buttons of big mid-ruds or the eighteen buttons. 4. ARC Straightwire (never accepting "Yes" only for an answer, please). Used on a pc who is spinny or neurotic or feels bad. 5. General O/W. 6. 2-12A using List One Issue 3, 4 RI Package. Or a case repair on 2-12 or 2-12A that has been done incorrectly elsewhere. 7. Wrong goal on a pc who has had a wrong goal run. Eighteen-button repetitive Prepcheck "On the goal ______" or appropriate wording. The V Unit new student must emerge from V Unit in better case condition than when entering it, and not a rock slammer. These are the only criteria for the new student leaving V Unit. They are demonstrated by: a. Tone arm reading now around Clear reads. b. Not R/Sing on List One Issue 3. STUDENT WIN The new student probably has no firm reality on auditing wins; even if an older auditor, wins may have been scarce. In V Unit the student auditor must obtain a win. The seven processes given above will obtain a win, one of them or any of them on any pc, providing nobody gets fancy. Just use one or two of the minor ones on any new student. Not all of them. And flatten what you start always. On pcs who are not rock slammers and arrive on course in good condition, do not run 2-12A. Instead, choose one of the other processes for such a student pc, the milder the better. And flatten it to no TA action. Make the student auditor just audit. Totally muzzled. No rudiments, no havingness. Just "Start of Session" and "End of Sesslbn." Use a meter. Thus, intelligently supervised, the new student will get a nice win. ESTABLISH A REALITY The new student, tightly supervised, doing plain Scientology with no frills, will obtain a reality that exact Scientology works. This discourages squirreling on course and gives the student an incentive to study Scientology as it is, not as altered. With a case gain, a win and a new reality, the student is ready for upper units and can be counted on to get fast passes and an early graduation. All failures to pass HCOBs and upper classes are traceable to case (R/Sing on List One), lack of wins and low reality on Scientology. Thus, these remedied, you get students graduating, not stagnating on course. It is the purpose of the V Unit Instructor to achieve these gains and pass the new student on. The V Unit is a co-audit, one or two weeks long, three hours of auditing given and three received daily, five days a week. In the remainder of the day, the unit is part of the W Unit, specializing in TRs 0-4 in Practical. The Instructor in the balance of the day fits into other units to assist instruction there, usually Practical, to supervise the TRs of V Unit students and others, or as assigned. SUMMARY We are trying to cure long periods on course. They are best cured by the use of a good V Unit. Students with a case gain, a win and a good reality on auditing will study harder, graduate faster, be better Scientologists. All randomity on a course (bad pass-flunk ratios, enturbulation, etc.) comes from rock slammers. Weed them out at course beginning and all gets very smooth on the main course. If a student on arrival is in good shape and not a rock slammer, a week in V Unit is all he or she should spend. The whole plan falls to pieces if a V Unit Instructor fails to make good the purposes of the unit for any reason. The original plan for the first training of an Academy student is many years old and had the above purposes as goals. This became the Comm Course because the purposes were not realized in actual practice and TRs only were substituted. New processes, muzzled auditing and a new understanding in general should now realize this earliest goal I had for a new student - a case gain, a win, a reality on Scientology. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 019 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 ACADEMY TAUGHT PROCESSES (OEC V4 p 339) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 FEBRUARY 1963 Issue II Academies Sthil Students ACADEMY TAUGHT PROCESSES The following processes must be taught in all Academies: 1. TheCCHs. 2. Assists. 3. ARC Straightwire. 4. GeneralO/W. 5. Pulling Missed Withholds. 6. Assist type Prepchecking using Suppress and Invalidate buttons only using a time period. 7. General Repetitive Prepchecking against a specific time period, big Mid Ruds and 18 button prepchecks. 8. Specific Repetitive Prepchecking against a subject, (auditing, listing, Item or Goal). 9. A Problems Intensive. 10. Routine 2-12A. 11. Routine3-M. It is recommended that all these are not taught in one course. An HPA/HCA certificate should include up to 9 above (Problems Intensive). A higher level course should take in Routines 2 and 3 (BScn or Hubbard Clearing Scientologist). The higher course need not be a completely separate course but run along with the usual Academy Course on different check sheets. A Saint Hill Graduate must be in close supervision of a course teaching Routines 2-12A and 3. 2-10 and 2-12 are now included as 2-12A. HPA/HCAs of earlier years, certificate in hand, may be entered as trying for BScn or HCS (US) even though passing the Prepcheck materials as well as Routines 2 and 3. No Classification may be assigned by reason of course attendance and examination only. Time on Staff or Saint Hill training are required for a Valid Classification even though "Valid for 2-12" is stamped on a certificate. With processes settling down we can get our house in order. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.cden Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 020 HCOPL 14 FEB 63 HOW TO EXAMINE; THEORY EXAMINATIONS (OEC V4 p 163) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 FEBRUARY 1963 Academies Sthil Students HOW TO EXAMINE THEORY EXAMINATIONS The two most serious causes of students or staff failing to pass or being unwilling to take Bulletin Checks are: 1. RS-ing on List One; and 2. Capricious Examination V Unit cares for the one. A study and practice of this Policy Letter should care for the other. -------------- The important points of a Bulletin, Tape or Policy Letter are: 1. The specific rules, axioms, maxims or stable data; 2. The doingness details, exactly how is it done; and 3. The theory of why it is done. All else is unnecessary. All you have to demand is the above. They are given in order of importance. (I) The rules, axioms, maxims or stable data must be known exactly verbatim and the student must be able to show their meaning is also known to him or her. (2) The doingness must be exactly known as to sequence and actions but not verbatim (in the same words as the text). (3) The theory must be known as a line of reasoning, reasons why or historical background and with accuracy, but not verbatim. The date of the lecture or bulletin or letter is relatively unimportant and other details of like nature should never be asked for. If a student or Staff Member is ever going to apply the data, then above (l) must be down cold, (2) must be able to be experienced and (3) must be appreciated. Asking for anything else is to rebuff interest and give a feeling of failure to the person being examined. An examiner should examine with fiendish exactness on (l)alertness on (2) and seeing if the student understands (3). An examiner should not go beyond these points, asking for what person was mentioned, who did the test, what is the copyright date, what are the first words, etc. Graduation from courses must be speeded up. And at the same time, the data, the important data must be known and understood. Good, sound examination is the answer here. Irrelevant examination questions only slow the student and extend the course. Be as tough as you please, but only on (l), (2) and (3) above. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.eden Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Revised and replaced by HCO P/L 4 March 1971 Issue II, How to do Theory Checkouts and Examinations.] ================== 021 HCOB 15 FEB 63 R2-R3, LISTING RULES (TV5 p. 241-2, NTV VII p. 35-7) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1963 Central Orgs Franchise R2 - R3 LISTING RULES An idiocy of long long lists can creep into Routine 2 and Routine 3. This is not as harmful as under-listing but it can make pcs pretty green or black and certainly holds up auditing. You must realize that "listing to a still Tone Arm" takes several things for granted: 1. That the auditor has his sensitivity at about 4 (Mark IV about 6) during listing. 2. That the auditor does not adjust the TA for surges (cognitions, etc). 3. That the TA is adjusted only when it has to be to get the needle into a readable position. 4. That the pc is answering the auditing question and not varying it or running havingness on himself. 5. That the rudiments are reasonably in, particularly SUPPRESS, INVALIDATE, PROTEST and DECIDE. 6. That the pc is capable of being in session. 7. That the pc isn't fiddling with the cans, yawning, stretching, etc. In other words, if an auditor has his pc under calm control the TA rule applies. As the control of the pc diminishes the TA rule grows less workable. But even so all is not lost. TA shifts because of body motion, yawning, asking questions, and particularly because of PROTESTS! do not count in reading TA position. The TA position that must be steady is for the list. So if you read it "TA position for the list must be motionless" you have it absolutely correct. The TA will also read for other attention positions such as on the auditor, on the room, on the body. The pc shifts his attention from the list and you get TA motion. The thing we want to know is: did the TA go right back to List Position when the pc put his attention back on the List. Or, with the pc's attention on the list, did the TA now move. If so, that's TA motion for the list and the list is incomplete. It's really very easy even if the pc is out of session, to find a motionless TA on the list. Understand this and you'll stop endless listing. "TA action out" is, however, not the first rule of a complete list. The rules of a complete list for R2 or R3 are: 1. TWO ITEMS (RR and RS) ARE NOT FIRING WHEN THE LIST RR AND RS ITEMS ARE READ BACK TO THE PC. 2. ONLY ONE ITEM RSes or RRs ON THE LIST WHEN RRs AND RSs NOTED DURING LISTING ARE READ BACK TO THE PC. THE OTHERS DO NOT READ. 3. THE LIST HAS THE RELIABLE ITEM ON IT. In Routine 2 these Rules apply: 4. ON A COMPLETED R2 SOURCE LIST, ONE RSing ITEM ONLY WILL RS WHEN READ BACK TO THE PC. 5. ON A COMPLETED R2 LIST TAKEN BY OPPOSING (EITHER WAY) A ROCKSLAMMING ITEM, THE RELIABLE ITEM WILL BE THE LAST ROCKSLAMMING ITEM ON THE LIST. IF IT IS NOT, THE ITEM BEING OPPOSED IS WRONG OR THE OPPOSITION WORDING IS WRONG WAY TO OR THE LIST IS INCOMPLETE. In Routine 3 these Rules apply: 7. ON A COMPLETED R3 SOURCE LIST, ONE ROCKET READING ITEM ONLY WILL RR WHEN READ BACK TO THE PC. NO RS OR OTHER RR ON THE LIST SHOULD NOW READ. 8. ON A COMPLETED R3 LIST TAKEN BY OPPOSING (EITHER WAY) A ROCKSLAMMING ITEM, THE RELIABLE ITEM WILL BE THE LAST ROCKET READING ITEM ON THE LIST. IF IT IS NOT, THE ITEM BEING OPPOSED IS WRONG OR THE OPPOSITION WORDING IS WRONG WAY TO OR THE LIST IS INCOMPLETE. 9. AN ITEM OR GOAL WHICH WAS SEEN TO ROCKET READ WHEN BEING WRITTEN DOWN BUT WHICH RSes WHEN READ BACK TO THE PC WILL ROCKET READ AGAIN IF GIVEN A BRIEF BIG MID RUDS PREPCHECK. The above are the rules which must apply. As some variability can result in various auditors' interpretation of a "still TA" and in how good a session the auditor can run, the TA rule is secondary. It still applies, it is still valid. But a pc on PROTEST! varies his TA all over the place and an auditor that can't handle a pc with a few deft mid ruds or get his question answered will get TA action when the list is flat. When you get the hang of it you will see that listing to a motionless TA is valid, but that of course is in an auditing session. On one of these overlong lists, you can tell if it's overlong by seeing if you have gone 50 Items (25 Items opposing RR RIs) past the last RS or RR, making sure that you don't get two Items on the list that fire, and thus find your Reliable Item. It's finding RIs that counts, not how long can we list. Also, avoid buying a pc's "hard sell" on an Item or condition. If it follows the above rules buy it. If not, just ack and go on. Auditors with low sales resistance need not apply. Often the pc says "It's a terminal" when it's an Oppterm. Apply the tests and do a decent test list before you make up your mind. Pcs don't really know - RIs have an aberrative value you know - so why buy a dramatized sales talk. The auditor is necessary because an auditor isn't in the RI and can think. So an auditor who buys a sales talk isn't an auditor. Get it? Audit R2 and R3 by the rules. If the rules don't seem to apply, take a walk and think over why. Don't just keep on in haggard hope. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:gl.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 023 HCOB 20 FEB 63 R 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION (CANC.BY HCOB 21 MAY 63) (TV5 p. 243-5, not in NTV) ROUTINE 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION Central Orgs Franchise HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 FEBRUARY AD13 (CANCELLED - see HCO B 21 May 63 Volume V p. 278) Central Orgs Franchise ROUTINE 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION Here is a needed revision of Goal Finder's Model Session which is cancelled herewith. The changes are: 1. Omitting Life or Livingness Goals completely. 2. Running general O/W until PC comes back up to PRESENT TIME and not just until needle is smooth. 3. Added - Run "Since the last time I audited you" Mid Ruds if TA is in a higher position from the last session pc had. 4. Put Havingness after goals or gains for the session. 5. Added a note that suppress is always done repetitively, as is the Random Rud. SESSION PRELIMINARIES All auditing sessions have the following preliminaries done in this order. 1. Seat the pc and adjust his or her chair. 2. Clear the Auditing room with "Is it all right to audit in this room?" (not metered) 3. Can squeeze "Squeeze the cans, please." And note that pc registers, by the squeeze on the meter, and note the level of the pc's havingness. (Don't run hav here.) 4. Go into the session start. ROUTINE 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION Where the pc has been well Prepchecked and is well under auditor control, 8n Auditor in a Routine 2 or Routine 3 session may omit rudiments in Model Session, using only goals for session, and havingness, goals and gains at end and general O/W, Mid Ruds and Random Ruds where needed in the session. This salvages about an hour's auditing time per day. Start and end of session commands are used, just no rudiments; general O/W may be found necessary on some pcs at session start in lieu of rudiments to get a cleaner needle. This does not apply to Rudiments and Havingness Sessions or Prepcheck Sessions and Problems Intensives. For a pc who is well smoothed out by staff auditors, then, and who is well under the goal finder's control, the following may be used, particularly with a Mark V Meter. START OF SESSION: Is it all right with you if I begin this session now? START OF SESSION. (Tone 40) Has this session started for you? If pc says, "No," say again, "START OF SESSION. Now has this session started for you?" If pc says, "No," say, "We will cover it in a moment." RUDIMENTS: What goals would you like to set for this session? Please note that Life or Livingness goals have been omitted, as they tend to remind the pc of present time difficulties and tend to take his attention out of the session. At this point in the session there are two actions which could be undertaken: the running of General O/W or the running of Mid Rudiments using "Since the last time I audited you". One would run General O/W if the pc was emotionally upset at the beginning of the session or if the session did not start for the pc, the latter being simply another indication of the pc's being upset or ARC broken, but those symptoms must be present, as sometimes the session hasn't started merely because of poor Tone 40 or because the pc had something he wanted to say before the auditor started the session. RUNNING O/W: If it is alright with you, I am going to run a short, general process. The process is: "What have you done?" "What have you withheld?" (The process is run very permissively until the needle looks smooth and the pc is no longer emotionally disturbed.) Where are you now on the time track? If it is alright with you, I will continue this process until you are close to present time and then end this process. (After each command, ask, "When?") That was the last command. Is there anything you would care to ask or say before I end this process? End of process. RUNNING THE MID RUDIMENTS: One would use the Middle Rudiments with, "Since the last time I audited you", if the needle was rough and if the Tone Arm was in a higher position than it was at the end of the last session. Since the last time I audited you has anything been suppressed? (This is always done by the repetitive system.) Since the last time I audited you, has anything been invalidated? Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you failed to reveal? Since the last rime I audited you, is there anything you have been careful of? (These latter four rudiments are done by fast check.) The "In this session" Mid Ruds can be used to straighten up a session that has completely gone out of the Auditor's control, after he has gotten in the Random Rudiment. "On this list" Mid Ruds, particularly with suppressed or invalidated can be used to get a pc to continue listing. RUNNING THE RANDOM RUDIMENT: In this session have I missed a withhold on you? In this session is there anything I failed to find out about you? In this session have you thought, said, or done anything I failed to find out? In this session have I nearly found out something about you? Any of the above versions may be used. The Random Rudiment is always run repetitively. END OF SESSION: Is it alright with you if we end off ...... now? Is there anything you would care to ask or say before I do so? End of .......... If the pc from the Auditor's observation is very agitated or upset, the Auditor would run General O/W as given above. If the session has been an extremely difficult session with the pc having been ARC broken badly and frequently, one would get in the "In this session" Mid Ruds in order to clean up the auditing, even though the pc may now be alright. Have you made any part of your goals for this session? Have you made any other gains in this session that you would care to mention? (After adjusting the meter) Please squeeze the cans. (If the squeeze test was not alright, the Auditor would run the pc's Havingness process until the can squeeze gives an adequate response.) Is there anything you would care to ask or say before I end this session? Is it alright with you if I end this session now? Here it is: END OF SESSION (Tone 40). Has this session ended for you? (If the pc says, "No," repeat, "END OF SESSION." If the session still has not ended, say, "You will be getting more auditing. END OF SESSION.") "Tell me I am no longer auditing you." Please note that Havingness is run after Goals and Gains as this tends to bring the pc more into present time and to take his attention to a degree out of the session. (Bulletin done by Mary Sue Hubbard after we worked it out) L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 024 HCOPL 21 FEB 63 GOALS CHECK (TV5 p. 246, NTV VII p. 38) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 FEBRUARY AD13 CenOCon URGENT GOALS CHECK Issue as Secretarial Executive Director: All Goals and Reliable Items found on students, staff or HGC pcs must be checked out and seen to rocket read by a qualified executive or staff Class IV before being run. Only Routine 3M is permitted as a clearing procedure and exactly as given in bulletins and tapes. All Clears must be checked out by a qualified executive before being pronounced Clear by the Organization or reported to me as such. No auditor may be permitted to audit staff members or HGC pcs or students who is not a regular staff member. No auditor may use Routine Three unless qualified by the Staff Training Officer or the Academy. No auditors not staff members may frequent the premises of the Organization for the purposes of obtaining private preclears. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 025 HCOB 22 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3M, RUNDOWN BY STEPS (NTV VII p. 39-45, previously considered confidential) (also see HCOB 6 MAR 63 which corrects this one) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 FEBRUARY 1963 Missions CenOCon ROUTINE 3M RUNDOWN BY STEPS (HCO Secs Check out more thoroughly than any you've ever checked before on all staff auditors and staff clearing people. SHSBC Lecture of 26 Feb. 1963 also covers this HCOB.) The steps of Routine 3M are as follows: PREPARE THE GOAL 1. Get the goal prepchecked so that some rocket reads are seen. Get it checked out. It may only have been seen to rocket read sometime in the past and will not now rocket read; prepcheck it until it RRs at least once. If so, go to Step 2. (3M can be started without having the goal if you have an RR RI from 2-12, if so start 3M with Step 8 and find goal as in Step 15.) DETERMINE GOAL QUESTION 2. Determine, by meter and by what the pc can answer, the wording for the goal oppose line: "Who or what would the goal oppose?" "Who or what would oppose?" "Who or what would somebody or something with the goal ____oppose? " "Who or what would (ing version of the goal) oppose?" Use only one of the above and use no other wording for the question. LIST SOURCE LIST 3. List a list in the usual way on a meter, watching carefully for rocket reads or rock slams as the pc gives items. Note these accurately on the list. If no R/Ses or RRs appear on this list assume that the goal was wrong or that the pc has been suppressed by other listing below RR or R/S. Do not proceed if no RRs or R/Ses were seen while listing; relegate the case to 2-12 repair (see below) or other goal finding. If R/Ses or RRs are seen on listing, proceed to next step. COMPLETE SOURCE LIST 4. List the list no less than 50 items (by actual count) beyond the last R/S or RR (whichever was last). In actual fact all TA action should be off the list by this time but auditors have trouble in some instances in interpreting what is TA action on the list. Keep going if you know what "no TA action" is but don't use ".005 divisions TA change" as an excuse to list pc black in the face. TEST LIST 5. Test list by reading two R/Ses or RRs back to pc. If only one R/S or RR is reading on the list, it is complete. If two are reading continue the list until you have new R/Ses or RRs and 50 beyond the last one again. Then retest. Be sure list is complete, by which is meant "it has an R/Sing or RRing item reading on it but not two, and an RI is on the list." FIND RI 6. Search out the R/Sing or RRing item by reading each one marked RR on listing back to pc. One should rocket read or rock slam without TD. If none are found that now R/S or RR, read the non-R/S, non-RR items just above and below each marked R/S or RR. (You may have mistaken which item R/Sed or RRed.) Work at it until you've found the reliable (reading on the meter when read back to the pc) item. If none R/S or RR use small tiger on those that DR. If still none R/S or RR extend the list until new R/Ses or RRs are seen. If no RI yet, null the whole source list. You only do this with goal-oppose (source) list. CLEAN UP RI 7. Get the big mid ruds in on the reliable item found. If it R/Sed it will turn into an RR if big mid ruds are put in on it. But even if it only still R/Sed, proceed to next step. If it vanishes without being listed extend goal-oppose list. DETERMINE WHETHER TERMINAL OR OPPTERM 8. Determine if the RI is a terminal or an oppterm. Just because an oppterm was indicated by the list question is no reason an oppterm will come up. If an exalted-sounding item it is probably an oppterm. If a degraded reversal of the goal it is probably a terminal. As more RIs accumulate on the line plot the less this is true. It finally reverses. Use any tests released. Wrong-way-to gives more mass to pc and reads less on meter. LIST THE RI 9. List the RI as a terminal "Who or what would (RI) oppose?" or as an oppterm " Who or what would oppose (RI) ? " If pc's face darkens or mass pulls in or if he can't keep the question in mind or can't think of answers easily or if needle tightens, etc., quickly abandon and start a new list with the reverse question. But be very careful not to keep reversing an R3 list. Don't test list as in R2. Be right in the first place and unload fast if you're wrong in the way it's being opposed. The more you change the way you oppose it the more mass you'll pull up on the pc. A reverse-way oppose list also has RRs and R/Ses on it. COMPLETE RI LIST 10. List 25 (not 23 or 20) items beyond the last R/S or RR. If you can read a tone arm, be sure the TA action is out of the list. But don't use TA action of one/millionth of a division as an excuse to list the pc into the ground with overlisting. The actual rule is "25 items beyond the last TA change and 25 beyond the last RR or R/S." Never list less than 25 items beyond the last RR or R/S. If a new RR or R/S occurs go 25 beyond it. TA action can be caused by Protest, Decide, ARC break. If the pc ARC breaks after you've stopped listing, the list must be extended as the ARC break, no matter what the pc says, comes from the item not being on the list. This step is very easy. Just list and note down the RRs and R/Ses seen on the meter as you list. Write fast. Get the item down correctly. Ask the list question only often enough to keep the pc listing. When he stops you ask the question. Or ask it when he asks for it. Don't overlist. R3 overlisting is brutally cruel. Don't underlist. Don't miss reads. The sensitivity is set at about 3 on a Mark V and 4 on a Mark IV for listing. The eye looks across the dial at the sheet beside the meter. You move the sheet up as you write. Left-hand meters are available at HCO WW for southpaws. Put your TA reads on your listing sheet each time TA changes. CHECK RI BEING LISTED 11. Check the item you are listingfrom. If it ticks or fires, don't do anything with the list you've just done. Continue it to a new RR or R/S and do 25 beyond it. The item can read because the pc is protesting or invalidating but usually it's just list more. If item being listed from doesn't read, proceed to 12. READ NEW RI 12. Say to the pc, "I will now read the last rock slamming item on the list." (Omit saying the above if the last item was an RR.) "That didn't read." (If it did, and an RR is above it your list is incomplete so do Step 11 again.) If it didn't read (which it shouldn't) say "I will now read the next-to-last rocket reading item on the list." Do so. If it RRs or R/Ses do Step 11 again. If it doesn't (which it shouldn't) say "That doesn't read." Now say, "I will now read the last rocket reading item on the list." Do so. If it reads (R/S or RR) say "That rocket reads." or "That rock slams." This is the one that must read. If it RRed when being written down but R/Sed when read back to pc, the only action necessary is to put in the big mid ruds on it and it will RR. If the last RR noted on list doesn't read, then say, "I will now read the item above it." (Read the one above, the one below, the one 2 above, the one 2 below.) As soon as you have one that fires, say, "That reads." Now don't do anything else when you have the item. Look silently at the pc. You will see him get lighter colored in the face, the tone arm will blow down, the meter will fire rocket reads as the pc cognites. If pc is in doubt say "That's your item." The needle may go free only for a space of 5 seconds if you go on into the next GPM. The residual mass of the goal you've just blown is held in more by the next GPM than by odd bits. So getting the next GPM is the most constructive and time-saving action. END OF STEPS ____________________ COMMENTS You mustn't let the pc represent RRing or R/Sing item as he lists. If he knows something R/Sed or RRed he may repeat variations of it. However, interfere as little as possible with the listing by the pc. Don't force listing or prevent it. Mask your paper from the pc. The frequency of the bank can get thrown awry by listing both ways or by doing a list wrong-way-to and getting a reverse item. But the upset is limited to the 25-item rule. On any one GPM where goofs have occurred, you may have to extend lists due to finding a tick (Step 11). All rules and steps still apply. You just have to extend a list (as in Step 11) more often. The item doesn't start appearing earlier on the list and the rule of the last RR is never violated. It's just that the "25 items after the last R/S or RR rule" becomes unworkable and you keep finding that the item you are listing from still ticks so you have to extend. Step 12 remains true. R3M is a purely mechanical activity. The better you know it, the more exactly you follow it, the more RR RIs you get, the less you figure-figure on it, the more Clears you'll make. 3M works because of 3M, not because of auditing frills. The only thing missing from these steps is the test battery to find if an RI is a terminal or oppterm. That is given on tapes and will be the subject of a whole HCO Bulletin. When an RI that is a terminal is used as an oppterm (wrong-wayoppose) more mass turns on. And vice versa. Wrongly call an RI and it's more mass, a darkening pc, discomfort, etc. Any RI that gives the pc unmistakable pain when said to the pc is a terminal always. The SEN is not as good to determine with as many terms also turn on SEN and no pain. Don't test list every RI both ways. In 3M that half kills the pc. Do it only in R2. Be right before you list. Look the pc over after you've listed 10 items to see if the face has darkened or discolored, watch out for a tightening needle. And list right-wayto only. Do 3M carelessly or wrong and you'll wrap the pc around a telephone pole. Crash. Be honest. Never fake a read. Never falsify a report. Somebody's future 200 trillion depends on that honesty. If it reads, say so. If it doesn't read, say so. Don't try to look good at the expense of a pc's future life. Repair 3M by TDing every RI on the line plot for reads. If none are reading at all, examine the lists for completeness. If these are short or goofed, complete them for an RI as per the rules. If all else fails, prepcheck the pc on auditing, listing and do a goal-oppose list. If that doesn't RR while being listed, examine the repair steps above in that order. This pc either had a wrong goal and the auditor didn't know a rocket read or the RR is hung up somewhere in the incomplete lists. The point is, don't goof. You can clear a whole goal GPM while trying to repair some nutty departure from 3M. You've got one clearing technique. Protect it. ___________ TWO TYPES OF LIST Remember, there are two types of lists in R3M: l. The goal-oppose as covered in Steps 1-7. This is called a "Source List." 2. The RI oppose (either way) as covered in Steps 8-13. This is called an "RI List." These follow different rules. The item can be any RR or R/S seen on a goaloppose list. The item is always the last RR on the RI oppose list. Realize that all goal-oppose lists follow the rules of Steps 1-7 and all RI oppose lists follow the rules of Steps 8-13. There are no exceptions. If the list you've done as a goal-oppose source list deviates from the phenomena found in Steps l-7, you've goofed, not 3M. If the RI oppose list you've done doesn't contain the phenomena in Steps 8-13, you've goofed, not 3M. Example: Auditor finds on an RI oppose list that the "RI" was the third RR from the bottom. That's wrong. Complete the list. It's that exact. ___________ OLD GOALS With the advent of 3M, the question of what to do about old goals or partially run goals or Keyed-Out Clears arises. ___________ RULE ON OLD GOALS On anybody who has ever had a goal found, whether it was listed partially or fully, run R3M just as though the goal had just been found. If it doesn't RR now it will still give RRs on the source list from it. It is all right to test list it. If the goal was wrong it will not give RRs on the source (goal opp) list. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 028 HCOB 25 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3-M GOAL FINDING BY METHOD B (Not in either set of tech vols, previously confidential, probably omitted from New Tech Vols because it is an excerpt of an earlier HCOB) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF FEBRUARY 25, 1963 Central Orgs Franchise R2 - R3 The following replaces HCO Buleetin of August 22, 1962 which is cancelled from all check lists. ROUTINE 3-M GOAL FINDING BY METHOD B (Information taken from HCO Bulletin of August 22, 1962) If your pc has a Rockslamming or Rocket Reading Oppterm anywhere on his line plot, you can list goals on the following 10 questions. Be sure that the item is now RSing or RRing and that the item is proven an oppterm by actual test. METHOD B LISTING QUESTIONS What goal might you have - (1) That would be an overt against (item)? (2) That (item) would consider impossible? (3) That (item) might consider was an overt? (4) That (item) would consider undesirable (also - for itself or themselves)? (5) That (item) would prevent you from doing? (6) That would be impossible to achieve if you were (item or part of item)? (7) That would be impossible if (item) were you? (8) That couldn't be achieved because (item) acted as a barrier? (9) That (item) would make too difficult? (10) (Simply) What goal might you have? Complete List One to at least 50 goals past a still TA and the last RS or RR. List each of the other questions in turn. Lists Two through Ten can be continued as long as the pc lists easily on each one. Be sure to note TA position, RS and RR. Clear each question with pc before listing on it. ASSESSMENT Tiger Drill the RRing goals on List Six above first, being careful of Suppress, working it over hard. If the goal is not on List Six, use List Five. If not on Five, go over List Four. If not on List Four, Tiger Drill the RRing goals on the remaining Lists One through Ten. The pc will probably know his goal. Or his goal will recur on several of the Lists. It is most likely that the first RRing goal on List Six will be it. The goal must be checked out by a Class IV auditor before it can be listed. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER ================== 029 HCOB 4 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A (TV5 p. 247, NTV VII p. 47) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MARCH 1963 Central Orgs URGENT ROUTINE 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A Cease to use Routine 2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A in the HGC and Academy and on staff clearing except as follows: Cases that RS on List One and whose goal cannot be found. Cases that need R2-10, 2-12 or 2-12A completed or repaired. Why? 3M suddenly emerged and is simpler than R2-10, 2-12 or 2-12A. An auditor can turn off somebody's RS and RR by using Routine 2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A wrongly, thus making it harder to find the goal and do 3M. Routine 2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A can help find a goal. It can also submerge a goal when packages are not completed. R2-10, 2-12, 2-12A Case Repair consists of completing any obvious package from Existing RIs. 3M, I repeat, emerged after Routine 2 and is easier to teach and use. Do not leave a Routine 2 package of 4 from already found RIs incomplete because of this HCO Bulletin. Complete it. Avoid Long, Protested Listing as only this can mess up a pc's RR or RS. Routine 2-12 may be taught in an Academy but not used on students' cases. I am working on easily done Routine 2-GX which is a Goal Finding Routine consisting of the nearly exact pattern of a Problems Intensive but asking a different question, which adds up to listing times in the pc's life when his purpose was balked and assessing and running as in a Problems Intensive. More goals are being delivered by ordinary Problems Intensives than by Routine 2-12. R2-12 is a highly successful process but fails in some hands. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:gl.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 030 HCOPL 6 MAR 63 SELLING TECHNIQUES FORBIDDEN (OEC vol 2 p325) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 MARCH 1963 CenOCon Registrars SELLING TECHNIQUES FORBIDDEN Registrars, and other personnel concerned with selling, are forbidden to sell a preclear a specific technique. Preclears must be sold PROCESSING. The techniques to be used are decided by the D of P within the framework of the current rundown of processes. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 031 HCOB 6 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO HCOB OF FEB 22, 1963 R3M (NTV VII p. 48, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MARCH AD 13 Central Orgs Missions URGENT CORRECTION TO HCO BULLETIN OF FEBRUARY 22, 1963 Please correct that HCOB as follows. It is vital to do so. STEP ONE Third line middle sentence, correct to read: Prepcheck it until it consistently RRs at least once out of three, every time it is said three times to the pc. In a Goals Prepcheck, Tiger Drill or Mid Ruds Prepcheck, do not use, never use, "On the goal to catch catfish has anything been ." Use only and always just the wording of the actual goal: "On to catch catfish, has anything been ." See Step 2 for reasons why. STEP TWO Delete entire step. Substitute: Use only the wording, "Who or what would (the exact wording of the goal) oppose." Do not use, "Who or what would 'the goal to catch catfish' oppose." Do not use, "Who or what would 'somebody or something with the goal to catch catfish' oppose." Do not use, "Who or what would 'catching catfish' oppose." Why? Using the hypothetical goal "to catch catfish," in GPMs toward the bottom there are reliable items called "The goal to catch catfish," "Somebody with the goal to catch catfish," "Somebody or something with the goal to catch catfish," and "Catching catfish." As these are RIs using anything but the naked goal in goal oppose or prepchecking can restimulate the RI and cause the goal not to fire. Therefore use only the naked goal in any operation involving the goal. Don't add "the goal" to it or any other words. Just "To catch catfish." L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== 034 HCOB 8 MAR 63 USE OF THE BIG MIDDLE RUDIMENTS (TV5 p. 248, NTV VII p. 49) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MARCH AD13 Central Orgs Franchise USE OF THE BIG MIDDLE RUDIMENTS The Big Mid Ruds can be used in the following places: At the start of any session. Examples: "Since the last time I audited you _____________________ " "Since the last time you were audited ______________________ " "Since you decided to be audited _____________________ " In or at the end of any session. Example: "In this session ____________________ " On a list. Examples: "On this list _____________________ " "On (say list question) _____________________ " On a goal or item. Example: "On (say goal or item) _____________________ " Never say "On the goal to catch catfish ____________________ " or "On the item, a catfish _____________________ " Say simply the goal itself or the item itself. ORDER OF BUTTONS Here is the correct wording and order of use for the Big Mid Ruds. " ______________ has anything been suppressed?" " ______________ is there anything you have been careful of?" " ______________ is there anything you have failed to reveal?" " ______________ has anything been invalidated?" " ______________ has anything been suggested?" " ______________ has any mistake been made?" " ______________ is there anything you have been anxious about?" " ______________ has anything been protested?" " ______________ has anything been decided?" In using the first three buttons (Suppressed, Careful of and Failed to Reveal), the rudiment question should be asked directly of the pc off the meter (repetitive). When the pc has no more answers, check the question on the meter. If the question reads, stick with it on the meter like in Fast Rud checking until it is clean. The last six buttons are cleaned directly on the meter as in Fast Ruds. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 036 HCOB 9 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14 (NTV VII p. 51-3, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MARCH AD 13 Missions URGENT ROUTINE 2 AND 3M CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14 The first 5 First Goal Clears made by R3M brought to light the following vital datum: Auditors tend to overrun into the next GPM without having a firing goal. VANISHING R/S AND RR The ONLY thing that makes a pc's ability to RR or R/S vanish on a meter is finding too many RIs without finding the goal. The pc can be overwhelmed by RIs if he or she has no goal to align them to. THIS IS TRUE OF ROUTINE 2. Every RI found is part of a GPM. Finding too many (more than 4) RIs (whether they R/S or RR) with Routine 2 or Routine 3M will narrow the pc's ability to R/S and RR and will cause his or her R/S or RR to VANISH. Thereafter you will see no R/Ses or RRs on any list. It is natural for the R/S or RR to vanish on a Routine 2 or 3M item when it is opposed. The R/S and RR on a goal vanish when the goal is run out. What I'm talking about is the ability of the pc to R/S and RR on lists and new goals. ROUTINE 2 Every R2 item is a GPM RI. Find too many R2 RIs, no matter how, and fail to find a goal that RRs and you'll not see any more R/Ses or RRs on that pc until the goal has been found. The difficulties of finding a goal with the pc's RR off is something I need not stress. The RIGHT goal, well prepchecked and seen to RR, will turn on the pc's ability to R/S and RR in general. This is life and death data. DON'T find too many R2 or 3M RIs without finding a goal. The RR and R/S ability does not vanish by failing to package up, oppose and square away RIs. It only vanishes if you fail to find a goal. Four RIs with no goal is MAXIMUM. You can get two Routine 2 RIs to help find a goal. After that STOP until the goal is found. 3DXX, ETC., ITEMS All the 3DXX, 3GA, 3GAXX items, no matter how found, must be put on a pc's 3M line plot. They were all GPM RIs. Use them to find the goal. Get them added up to the goal when the goal is found. FAVORITE GOAL Some pcs have a second GPM goal (or third or fourth) which won't RR yet. And is not ready to run. Their attention gets so stuck on it they can't cooperate in finding the first GPM's goal. The thing to do is to list " What goal might have been postulated after (favorite goal, bare words like 'To Catch Catfish') had failed." This moves pc's attention to a later GPM. And you'll again get TA action on listing goals. By favorite goal is meant the goal that the pc thought (and fought) was his but no amount of prepchecking could make RR regularly. Most pcs on whom you can't find a firing (RRing) goal had a favorite goal. Ask them what it was or when it went out and use it in the above. Five is the common TA read for a pc who hasn't got a goal and is stuck on the last (now run out) goal or on a favorite (too deep) goal. When the TA goes to 5.0 or thereabouts in listing goals, and you can't get it to move and you haven't got a firing (RRing) goal, use the above method. It applies to R2 and R3M pcs alike at any stage of case or in any GPM. The wording can also be (for pcs in first, second or third GPM) "What goal might have failed before (last goal) was postulated." Various wordings can be used, the intention being to get pc's attention off a GPM and onto another GPM. CHANGE IN R3M STEP 13 As auditors can easily slide on by a GPM into the next and miss the rocket firing blowdown, or don't heed it, this must be added to Step 13 and never omitted. If omitted you can turn off the pc's ability to RR no matter how many (up to 5 or 6 anyway) GPMs have been run. Add after "Just take pc's opinion for use in making tests." NOW READ THE PC'S GOAL THREE TIMES, CAREFULLY NOTICING WHETHER IT RRs OR R/Ses ONCE OUT OF THREE OR NOT OR IF IT TICKS OR FALLS. If the pc's old goal only ticks or falls and the RR or R/S has vanished, then you have passed THE ROCKET FIRING BLOWDOWN. When the goal closes to RR or R/ S you have only 5 or 6 or at the most 8 RIs to go before free needle occurs on that goal. Keep finding RIs so long as you can make the goal tick or fall with Tiger Drill. The moment the goal ceases to react with a tick or fall do this: l. Find a new goal by ordinary listing or any means; 2. Give the old goal an 18 button Prepcheck. Do not Tiger Drill the old goal to get it to R/S or RR as it will briefly and then fold up. The new goal, if it R/Ses, must be tiger drilled or prepchecked until it RRs. This happens right after a rocket firing blowdown (or blow UP in low TA cases) to Clear read but auditors miss it and often a brief blowdown to Clear read occurs with the old goal still in action. The only test then is whether the old goal RRs or R/Ses. And then in your Step 14 pick up the last RRing item on the spiral staircase, get it to fire and oppose it. Don't do a goal oppose with the new goal. If no RRing item now exists on the line plot, then use the new goal for a goal oppose list as in Step 2 and proceed on down the steps of 3M. If you always read the goal to the pc in Step 13 and never go on opposing if the goal does not RR or R/S, you will never turn off a pc's ability to RR or R/S and the GPMs will stay straight. To keep on opposing and finding items after the old goal has ceased to rocket read or R/S is to court real disaster. This is the commonest auditor error in R3M, to shoot on past the old GPM and go racing into the next with no goal. Suddenly, disaster, RR and R/S off, pc screaming. No atmosphere in which to find a new goal. R3M STEP 14 Delete second paragraph in step "Occasionally, etc." Delete fourth paragraph. Substitute: The number of RIs in a GPM vary greatly. The first GPM encountered may be newly formed and have only two or three RIs in it. A GPM is as long as the goal of it will continue to RR or R/S while opposing items. When its goal no longer R/Ses or RRs when read to pc, the GPM limit has been reached. A new goal for a GPM must be made to RR before being used. Listing will improve its read. The RR then becomes an R/S, then an RR again but latent or prior and as it finally discharges from the bank in a rocket firing blowdown and only then ticks, falls or DRs. L. RON HUBBARD Founder (Editors Note: This HCOB has been corrected per HCOB 13 MAR 63, ADDITIONAL CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14 which only contained the corrections done here) [FZ Ed Note: the above editor's note is in the new tech vol, we do not have a copy of the 13 Mar additional correction to identify what was changed] ================== 037 HCOB 10 MAR 63 VANISHED R/S OR RR (TV5 p. 249-50, NTV VII p. 54-6) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 MARCH 1963 Central Orgs Franchise URGENT ROUTINE 2-10 2-12 2-12A (Also applies to Routine 3-M) VANISHED RS OR RR A preclear whose Items while listing or whose Items when found Rockslam, can be said to be "capable of Rocket Reading or Rockslamming". IF no RRs or RSes are seen on a preclear's list or any list while listing and also if no Items RS when called back, the preclear can be said to be "incapable of Rocket Reading or Rockslamming". Some preclears are incapable of producing an RS or RR except on the first GPM goal when found. No matter how much Item listing is done, no matter from what source, no RR or RS is seen while listing and none is found when the list is complete. No technique to turn on a pc's RS or RR will ever be found except one: Find the pc's goal for the 1st GPM. WHAT MAKES RRs & RSes VANISH The thing which turns off a pc's RR or RS is TOO MANY RELIABLE ITEMS FOUND WITHOUT FINDING THE PC'S GOAL. This can be done by life or by Auditing. As it can be done by life, some raw meat pcs will not RR or RS. It can be surmised that they have been set about in life by too many Reliable Items in full view. For instance a pc has an RI, FATHER, an RI, POLITICIAN, an RI, CITY. His father is politician who insists on living in a city. These and others in his bank, although undisclosed, are yet restimulated, and this pc will not be seen to RS or RR on listing, and no RS or RR is likely to be seen even if an actual RI is found. There is no use here for a more forceful way to get RIs. The rules are very plain, unvaried and uncompromising: RULE: WHEN A PC'S RS OR RR IS OFF, STOP TRYING TO FIND MORE RIs. No matter if you could find them, the RR or RS would just go more thoroughly off if you did. RULE: FINDING MORE RIs WILL NOT TURN AN RR OR RS BACK ON. There is a danger signal in this. The pc's RR or RS starts getting smaller, Item by Item, RI by RI; get off fast. Let the last RI be the last one looked for. If just one more is found, bang, no RR or RS on this pc no matter what is "found" in the way of RIs. RULE: COMPLETING R2 OR R3 PACKAGE WILL NOT TURN ON THE RR OR RS. However don't let the pc ARC Break on an incomplete list by starting one. It may be possible to find one more RI that gives a feeble slam, but then you've had it. However the picture is not all black. Pcs who were "incapable of RR or RS" have been subjected to 26 lists after with no RR or RS seen and still have recovered. RESTORING THE RR & RS The Rockslam and Rocket Read are brothers. A pc will Rockslam and yet not Rocket Read because the Rocket Read is the frailer brother. A pc going down hill toward no RR or RS first loses his RR. It now shows only as an RS. Then the RS vanishes too. You can't Prepcheck an RS into an RR on some pcs if the pc is on the way down toward no RR or RS. Ordinarily, however, a lot of RSes can be Prepchecked into RRing if there is an RR there to fire. An RR as it expires may become an RS. The ability to RR, then, goes out first. There is only one thing that restores the pc's ability to RR or RS. RULE: THE ONLY THING THAT WILL RESTORE THE ABILITY OF A PC TO RR OR RS IS TO FIND THE PC'S FIRST (or next) GPM GOAL. Naturally it is far easier to find a Rocket Read on a goal before the pc loses his ability to Rocket Read. It is far from impossible however to find a goal on a pc that is "incapable of RRing or RSing" and far from impossible to get it to RR by Prepcheck as the pc will always RR again on the right goal. Just listing goals eases the condition of "no RR or RS". And once an RR or RS that has been shut off is found again on the goal, the pc's RR or RS is "on again" on everything. On some pcs, the goal is so charged that you will find an immediate Rocket Firing Blow Down of the TA. You get long Rocket Reads one after another as the pc realizes it is the goal. This is particularly true on some pcs who have had a lot of RIs found. In such a case you no more find the goal and Prepcheck it than you have to find another for the next GPM. ALL ITEMS COUNT ANY ITEM found by 3DXX, 3GA, 3GAXX, or even earlier "for running processes on" are ALL part of the GPM and must be put on the pc's Line Plot. It doesn't matter how they were found or by whom, or if they were checked out or not. They belong on the Line Plot and can be used to find goals. RULE: PUT ANY ITEM EVER FOUND ON THE PC BY ANY PROCESS ON THE LINE PLOT. EVERY ONE WILL ADD UP TO A GOAL. Therefore even "bad Items", Items that were found from representing RSing Items, backwards oppose Items, all belong on the Line Plot. It is understood here that there was some kind of an assessment. Whatever was found by any kind of an assessment since 1954 belongs on the Line Plot and can be used to help find goals. FOUR RIs In R2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A you are allowed only four RIs before the pc's goal must be found. If the RS or RR is seen to get smaller from one Item to the next, abandon 2-12 and begin 3-M goal finding at once. When you find the pc's goal, and when you are adding up and Prepchecking the first GPM, you will discover that everything found on the pc for the last nine years was part of his first or another GPM. So, old auditing paid off! In view of this, on old pcs, it's safest to go for the goal as your first auditing action. You can use any Item ever found to help get that goal. On raw meat pcs get a couple RIs if you can by R2-12 and use that to help find the goal. With luck one will even RR. But find the goal before opposing it. SUMMARY This discovery of what monitors the RS and RR of a pc is a very important one. I've worked ceaselessly on this since the first of the year and finally isolated it. Even a 3rd goal clear isn't immune to losing his RS and RR if you keep finding scores of Items with no goal or a wrong goal. So treat the RS and RR with respect when found, and find the pc's goal when he won't RS or RR and you've got it made. You don't need a better meter. Only the pc's goal. This rules out unlimited R2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A on a pc. But these give you the two or four RIs necessary for easy goal finding so R2 is of value after all! And I've a Prepcheck coming up that helps loosen up the pc's goal, so we're still all right. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 039 HCOB 13 MAR 63 THE END OF A GPM (NTV VII p. 57-61, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 13 MARCH 1963 Issue II Central Orgs Missions THE END OF A GPM A Goals Problem Mass has an exact anatomy. It does not vary pc to pc except in significance. The mechanics are all the same. A full dissertation on the GPM exists on tapes. This is not a repeat of that data, although it corrects some of it. I wish to give you exactly what you need to know to pilot through a GPM with a pc. There are many GPMs. Four of them take one back about 20 trillion at a rough estimate. Some cover 2 1/2 trillion. Some as much, at a guess, as 15 trillion. The last one formed may be only partially formed and cover as little as 60,000 years. The first one encountered then, by the auditor, may be the least standard but only at its top. The bottom RIs of the first GPM will be standard. This is the old story of the hardest part of the case is the beginning. This is a standard GPM. The first GPM encountered is just the same but may be missing its top RIs (those closest to PT). (See diagram on next page.) ---------- [Ed. - in the following diagram, the RIs (both oppterms and terminals) are written in capital letters. The diagram has arrows indicating how the items were listed, from one to the next. The horizontal lines point from the terminal to the oppterm. The diagonal lines point from the oppterm down to the next terminal and are shown with "\"s because we can't draw a true diagonal line in text mode. These diagonal lines have comments written on them about the meter reads] Goal: To Scream Oppterm Term Goal Oppose List ----->---\ \ THE MOST SCREAMISH <-------------------------- A MUTE \ ----Goal Small RR --->---\ \ LOUD VOICES <--------------------------------- SOMEBODY WHO \ CAN'T WHISPER ----- Goal Large RR -------->---\ \ SNARLS <-------------------------------------- A WHISPERER \ ----------- Goal RRs ------------>---\ \ A SOUND <------------------------------------- A FAINTER \ ---------- Goal Large RRs ------->---\ \ SOMETHING THAT <------------------------------ A PLEADER MAKES A NOISE \ \ Repetative RRs, occasional R/Ses, TA blowing \-down well on items found->-\ \ WHATEVER MIGHT <------------------------------- A YOUNG GIRL MAKE A SOUND \ \ Goal RRs loosely, ---- sometimes R/Ses ---->----\ \ PROVOCATION <---------------------------------- A LADY \ -Goal has latent and prior RRs->-\ \ A HOSTILE <------------------------------------ A CABARET SINGER AUDIENCE \ \-Goal has latent and prior RRs->--\ \ A FRIGHTENING <-------------------------------- A LOUD MAN SIGHT \ \-Rocket firing blowdown to Clear read-\ \ A REPROVER <------------------------------------ A SCREAMER \ No RR on goal only dirty \-- needle or tick or fall -->---\ \ SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING <----------------------- SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING THAT DISLIKES SCREAMING WITH THE GOAL TO SCREAM \ \- Goal ticks or falls-->---\ \ SILENCE <------------------------------------- THE GOAL TO SCREAM \ \--- Goal falls ---------------->---\ \ TO SCREAM Goal as RI Free Needle, / --<---No reaction on Goal-----/ / / Next GPM HAPPY PEOPLE ---------- The above plot, with dates added, is the way your GPM line plot should look. There may be more items, and in the first GPM you contact there may be less from the top down, but this synthetic plot will assist you in knowing what to do with your preclear. Note that the first oppterm in a complete GPM is the most likely to be a successful form of goal RI, and the first terminal at the top the least successful RI terminal of the goal. This will keep you from making errors in selecting out the first RI you contact. RULE: THE FIRST TERMINAL CONTACTED WILL BE FOUND TO BE THE MOST DEGRADED FORM OF THE GOAL OF THAT GPM AND THE FIRST OPPTERM AN EXALTED FORM OF THE GOAL. Of course, in a first GPM that is not fully complete, the above rule may not hold true but this is an exception. A first oppterm found is usually a better expression of the goal even in the first GPM than the first terminal. In all subsequent GPMs (second, third, fourth) there are no exceptions to the above rule. It is very upsetting to the pc and the bank to oppose the first thing you find in a GPM wrong-way-to. Or to oppose any RI wrong-way-to for that matter. But even this doesn't change the rules. Note that the RI HAPPY PEOPLE in the next GPM does not fit the goal TO SCREAM. The real time to get the next goal after TO SCREAM is when you have found HAPPY PEOPLE. If you go more than 4 RIs into the next GPM (after you saw TO SCREAM cease all reads) after the goal TO SCREAM, you are putting the pc in real danger as THE R/S AND RR MAY SHUT OFF on the pc, thus making it very hard to find the next goal. However, if you try to find the next goal after TO SCREAM with the pc no further along than the RI A REPROVER in the above plot, you won't find the next goal. The TA will go up to 5 and the pc will muddle about giving you goals (which won't RR) out of the remaining (unfound) items of the goal TO SCREAM. If you find RIs into the next GPM after RI HAPPY PEOPLE without first finding its goal, not only will the pc's ability to RR and R/S eventually vanish (about 12 RIs later than RI HAPPY PEOPLE) but a goal oppose list done on TO SCREAM may give you the goal of the GPM two down from that of TO SCREAM and you will have skipped a whole GPM (the one with HAPPY PEOPLE at the top). Now, you've missed the goal of a whole GPM (although you have half its items), and my, won't that poor pc ARC break. RULE: THE FURTHER THE PC GOES INTO A GPM WITHOUT THE GOAL, THE HARDER IT IS TO GET THE GOAL AND THE MORE LIKELY IT IS THAT YOU'LL GET THE NEXT GPM'S GOAL AND MISS THE GOAL OF THE GPM YOU HAVE ITEMS FOR. TROUBLE What you can say with certainty is the more you depart from SOP 3M, the more trouble you'll have. Don't invite trouble by thinking and worrying too much. WORRY is the occupa-tional hazard of the auditor doing 3M. The Worry Rule: RULE: SO LONG AS THE PC IS HAPPILY GOING ALONG AND YOU'RE FINDING GOALS AND RIs ON SCHEDULE, KEEP CALM. START WORRYING AND CORRECTING WHEN THE PC IS ARC BREAKY AND LOOKS BAD. Example: Auditor finds the RR on the list (on reading back to the pc) 5 items above the last RR marked on the list. There is no RR on the list after the RRing item found. Pc is happy with item found. It RRed. It was the last RR found on nulling. How the auditor saw an RR 5 items later is caused by the pc continuing to think about the one 5 above while he lists. The pc is actually representing the item the auditor finds. Hence it looks like a list item 5 down fired. There was no fire on the list item in nulling. What should the auditor do? Well, the pc is cheerful about the RRing item that was found. There is no RR on nulling after it. No other item on the list now fires. So it's the pc's item, a bona fide RI. The above is excess worry. It will all come out all right as it follows the senior rules. But there is another extreme. Too little worry: Example: The auditor finds HAPPY PEOPLE in sequence on the above plot. The pc (out of pride) says that's a terminal. The auditor carelessly lists it without any careful test. The pc starts looking black. The auditor keeps on going. The pc gets "flu." The auditor plunges on without correcting the item, finds 4 more without a goal found, runs out of RR RIs (blank lists), does a goal oppose on TO SCREAM, lands in the GPM after next (beyond the one of HAPPY PEOPLE), runs out of all RRs and R/Ses on the pc, can't hold the pc in-session, pulls missed withholds and prepchecks. Pc and auditor together dive off highest bridge on "realizing 3M doesn't work and case is hopeless." (Joke.) The auditor didn't start worrying when the pc started looking and feeling bad, kept adding more errors to an unhealed ARC Break and BANG! R2-45. RULE: THE MORE YOU DO AFTER AN ARC BREAK OR PC UPSET WITHOUT CORRECTING THE EXACT REASON FOR THE UPSET, THE HARDER THE UPSET IS TO CORRECT. Routine 3M has a terrific wallop. Its ARC breaks are fantastic. When it starts to go wrong, stop and set it right. But if it isn't going wrong, don't try to set it right. Keep going. After you have done a few GPMs your heart will settle back into your chest and you'll lose that hunted look. So for the auditor, the start of auditing 3M is the worst, as in the pc the start of the case is the worst. Fortunately, GPMs are carbon copies, with terrific precision of construction. Do one and you'll have done the actions you'll do on all. So learn the rules right. And make Clears. WARNING Auditors who are not well trained make errors and then in failing, try to correct by inventing new rules and procedures. We have already had a "3M" where the RIs did not have to fire to be used. We have had several other brands. Remember this: a Clear is a Clear. The attainment of Clear lies on the other side of a GPM. Man has been unable to crack the riddle of the bank until now. We have the rules. 3M makes Clears. There are only about 20 errors you can make. There is only 1 path through the GPM. It has been found. The myth of one-shot Clear has been exploded. There is no easier way to Clear. So learn the rules well; don't think you've found exceptions to the rules. You haven't. Banks "got built" that way. Thetans are freed this way. Study 3M like you've never studied anything before. You can learn it. You can make Clears. You can be Clear. Who said it was easy? Man, it's impossible! And has been for trillennia! And we can do it. The first of all the ages to understand and free the human spirit. So, get busy. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ================== _