No matching fragments found in this document.
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME
SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 12
**************************************************
The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of:
1. The Old Tech Volumes
2. The New Tech Volumes
3. Confidential Material
4. BTBs
5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech
6. Anything else appropriate that we can find
They do not include
a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those)
b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately)
Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice
as much material as the old tech volumes), and because
the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the
years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each
year as a separate volume.
The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and
repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the
remaining parts to keep the size down.
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
145 HCOB 9 SEP 63 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING
(TV5 p. 361-62, NTV VII p. 299-301)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 SEPTEMBER AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING
(Compiled from HCO Bulletins of July 2, 3 and 4, AD12)
HOW TO GET THE RUDIMENTS IN
Just as an E-Meter can go dead for the auditor in the
presence of a monstrous ARC break, I have found it can go
gradiently dull in the presence of out rudiments. If you
fail to get one IN then the outness of the next one reads
faintly. And if your TR1 is at all poor, you'll miss the
rudiment's outness and there goes your session.
To get over these difficulties, I've developed Repetitive
Rudiments.
The auditor at first does not consult the meter, but asks
the rudiments question of the pc until the pc says there is
no further answer. At this point the auditor says, "I will
check that on the meter." And asks the question again. If
it reads, the auditor uses the meter to steer the pc to the
answer, and when the pc finds the answer, the auditor again
says, "I will check that on the meter" and does so.
The cycle is repeated over and over until the meter is
clean of any instant read (see HCO Bulletin of May 25,
1962, for Instant Read).
The cycle:
1. Run the rudiment as a repetitive process until pc has
no answer.
2. Consult meter for a hidden answer.
3. If meter reads use it to steer ("that" "that" each time
the meter flicks) the pc to the answer.
4. Stay with the Meter and do (2) and (3).
The process is flat when there is no instant read to the question.
One does not "bridge out" or use "two more commands". When
the meter test of the question gets no instant read, the
auditor says, "The meter is clean".
The trick here is the definition of "With Session". If the
pc is With Session the meter will read. If the pc is
partially against session the meter will read poorly, and
the rudiment will not register and the rudiment will get
missed. But with the pc with session the meter will read
well for the auditor.
FAST CHECKING
A Fast Check on the Rudiments consists only of Steps (2)
and (3) of the cycle done over and over.
Watching the meter the auditor asks the question, takes up
only what reads and, careful not to Q and A, clears it. One
does this as many times as is necessary to get a clean
needle. But one still says "The meter is clean" and catches
up the disagreement by getting the additional answers.
When the question is seen to be clean, the question is left.
In using Fast Checking NEVER SAY, "THAT STILL READS."
That's a flunk. Say, "There's another read here."
REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING
We will still use the term "Prepchecking" and do all
Prepchecking by repetitive command.
STEP ONE
Without now looking at the Meter, the auditor asks the
question repetitively until the preclear says that's all,
there are no more answers.
STEP TWO
The auditor then says, "I will check that on the meter" and
does so, watching for the Instant Read (HCO Bulletin May
25, 1962).
If it reads, the auditor says, "That reads. What was it?"
(and steers the pc's attention by calling each identical
read that then occurs). "There ....... That .......
That ....... " until the pc spots it in his bank and gives
the datum.
STEP THREE
The auditor then ignores the meter and repeats Step One
above. Then goes to Step Two, etc.
STEP FOUR
When there is no read on Step Two above, the auditor says,
"The meter is clean."
This is all there is to Repetitive Prepchecking as a
system. Anything added in the way of more auditor questions
is destructive to the session. Be sure not to Q and A (HCO
Bulletin of May 24, 1962).
Be sure your TR4 is excellent in that you understand
(really, no fake) what the pc is saying and acknowledge it
(really, so the pc gets it) and return the pc to session.
Nothing is quite as destructive to this type of auditing as
bad TR4.
END WORDS
The E-Meter has two holes in it. It does not operate on an
ARC broken pc and it can operate on the last word (thought
minor) only of a question. Whereas the question (thought
major) is actually null.
A pc can be checked on the END WORDS OF RUDIMENTS QUESTIONS
and the charge on those single words can be made known and
the question turned around to avoid the last word's charge.
Example: "Are you willing to talk to me about your difficulties?"
The word "difficulties", said to the pc by itself gives an
Instant Read. Remedy: Test "Difficulties". If it reads as
itself then change the question to: "Concerning your
difficulties, are you willing to talk to me?" This will
only react when the pc is unwilling to do so.
Caution: This trouble of END WORDS reading by themselves
occurs mainly in the presence of weak TR1 and failure to
groove in the question to a "thought major". With good TR1
the END WORDS read only when the question is asked.
IN PRACTICE you only investigate this when the pc insists
strongly that the question is nul. Then test the end word
for lone reaction and turn the question about to make it
end with another end word (question not to have words
changed, only shifted in order). Then groove it in and test
it for Instant Read. If it still reacts as a question
(thought major) then, of course, it is not nul and should
be answered.
DOUBLE CLEANING
"Cleaning" a rudiment that has already registered nul gives
the pc a Missed Withhold of nothingness. His nothingness
was not accepted. The pc has no answer. A missed no-answer
then occurs. This is quite serious. Once you see a Rudiment
is clean, let it go. To ask again something already nul is
to leave the pc baffled - he has a missed withhold which
is a nothingness.
L.
RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.bp.cden
Copyright $c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
146 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA
[Not in either set of tech volumes. This was originally an
HCOB and was later reissued as a BTB. We do not have the
original HCOB version, but this BTB should be close. It is
from a Level D SHSBC pack circa 1980. Note that it has been
REVISED rather than simply re-issued. If someone has an older
unrevised version, please post it. - Ed.]
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
12 SEPTEMBER 1963R
REVISED & REISSUED 7 SEPTEMBER 1974 AS BTB
(REVISION IN SCRIPT)
CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1963 SAME TITLE
Remimeo
CCH'S DATA
The CCHs are a highly workable set of Processes starting
with Control, going to Communication and leading to
Havingness, in that order. The CCHs are auditing
specifically aimed at and using all the parts of the Two
Way Comm Formula.
CONTROL is the first action of the CCHs and is highlighted
by being done Tone 40 for the first two CCHs (CCH 1 and CCH 2).
The reason for Control being the main point is simply to
bring about an awareness of Terminals to which
communication will be possible; this is done by A. bringing
to the PC's awareness that his body and he are being
controlled from a particular KNOWN SOURCE POINT and B.
that he also is a Source Point of Control with Control over
self and body, all of which is accomplished with CCH 1.
i.e. Awareness of two known terminals:
Once the above has been done with CCH 1, the gains can be
developed further with CCH 2 by finding for the PC more
known points (environment) and familiarity in this "new"
environment plus the beginnings of the next major step
forward in this developement of Communication, the
awareness of distance.
COMMUNICATION (CCH3) is the next major step forward in the
rehabilitation of your PC. Tone 40 is used in the next step
but only on the motion. Communication is encouraged.
The type of Communication practised by the actual auditing
actions is that of "one way communication"
i.e.Cause-distance-effect with intention, attention,
duplication and understanding, plus the first glimmerings
of cause being given to the PC by Auditor receiving PC's
comm and then getting the PC to get the idea of
contributing to the motion. In this section you are also
going to develop the PC's ability to reach by showing him
it is safe to reach across a distance (hand contact
mimicry) and then reduce his dependency on YES? and
increase his reach even more (hand space mimicry).
As an added bonus to the above you are also on the
beginning step of Havingness (Duplication) as you will be
teaching the person to duplicate as a being in two way
communication and not as a body with reference to body
Right and body Left.
HAVINGNESS is the final step in this portion of the CCH
formula (full formula CCHCACTCH where A = attention
(control) T = Thinkingness (control)). This step of CCH 4
is the final culmination point which restores the PC's
ability to be in good two way communication with a high
level of Havingness. By the use of Duplication, the full
Two Way Communication Formula is practised in a physical
manner with the result that you will have travelled a very
very steep case gain from No Comm as a Thetan to full Two
Way Communication as a Thetan with lots of Havingness. i.e.
The emanation of an impulse or particle (Book and Motion)
from Source Point across a distance to Receipt Point with
the intention of bringing about at Receipt Point a
Duplication and understanding of that which emanated from
the Source Point, with Receipt Point then becoming the
Source Point back across the distance to the Source Point
which has now become the Receipt Point with intention,
attention, duplication and understanding.
OBSERVED GENERAL ERRORS
1. Not knowing how to change from Hand Contact Mimicry to
Hand Space Mimicry.
ANS. The change occurs on the run through the CCHs after
Hand Contact Mimicry is flat with no change, i.e. CCH 1, 2,
3 (HCM with change), 4,1,2,3 (HCM with change) 4, 2, 1, 2,
3 (HCM 5 commands only, no change), 4, 1, 2, 3 (Hand Space
Mimicry).
2. Trying to handle "verbal originations" on Tone 40 CCH 1
and 2.
ANS. Tone 40 is used to overcome revolt of circuits, Body
Originations are handled, circuits are not validated.
3. Overwhelming PC with very slow, very fast or
continuously varying speeds of movements.
ANS. An overwhelm is always wrong. Velocity plays an
important role in being part of the Comm Formula. By all
means experiment with it but pay close attention to PC,
make for wins and increase tolerance, not losses and
decrease tolerance.
4. Interrupting PC to handle a Body Origination.
ANS. Body Originations must be picked up when they occurs.
In deciding to pick up a Body Origination the Auditor
should bear in mind that it is against the Auditor's Code
to prevent a PC from carrying out a command.
5. While doing CCH 4 Auditor tells PC to do it Mirror-image-wise.
ANS. When the process is being done as per the Two Way
Communication Formula you will see that the PC will be
executing the command "mirror-image-wise" (the receipt
point has become the source point). However, to tell the PC
to do it mirror-image-wise is absolutely wrong as such a
direction will prevent the PC from looking and put him on a
self-audit.
6. Not being sure of a CCH flat point.
ANS. Flat Point = 3 cycles with no change in Comm Lag, no
physically observed change and the PC doing it.
7. Imprecise Body movements of Auditor on CCH 2.
ANS. Auditor on right side of PC (PC on Auditor's left)
with Auditor slightly in front of PC except on "Turn
around". The change of position is achieved by moving the
left leg one paoe to the left and forward in each case.
H. G. Parkhouse
Revised & Reissued as BTB
by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis
2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:SW:AL:MH:HP:mh
Copyright c 1963, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The revisions in script consist of the words "and understanding"
being added after the word "duplication" in two places in the
paragraph beginning with "HAVINGNESS is the"]
==================
148 HCOPL 18 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY FIVE SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS (CANC PER OEC)
(OEC V4 p 165)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Central Orgs
Academies
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 SEPTEMBER AD 13
SCIENTOLOGY FIVE
SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS
The following is a guide to Scientology Instructors:
1. Scientology is a heuristic science.
2. The data has been discovered and assembled by L. Ron Hubbard.
3. The data has been amply covered and explained by
L.R.H. in lectures and bulletins and books.
4. Training Drills have been devised and/or approved by L.R.H.
and are more than adequate.
5. Auditing Routines, Processes and Procedures have also been
prepared by L.R.H. and they are fully comprehensive and up-to-date.
The curriculum for any course has been carefully designed
and/or approved by L.R.H.
It should therefore be apparent that it is unnecessary for
an instructor to explain data, training drills or
procedures either in long individual talks or in 'lectures'
to groups of students.
The job of an instructor is restricted to and his efforts
should be concentrated on checking to see that a student
knows his data, can do his TRs and can follow auditing
procedure. This is done by testing and observation. If a
student flunks a test he is directed to study and/or
practise the material some more. If instructor finds from
observation that student does not know his data or is not
practising it correctly then the student is directed to
study and/or practise accordingly. An instructor is not a
coach.
Within the foregoing is the student who asks questions.
This shows he does not know his data or training drill. The
answer to the student's question is contained in the
published data so all an instructor has to do is to refer
the student to the book chapter, bulletin or tape that
contains the data. Instructor should avoid giving direct
answers for at least two reasons.
1. To encourage student to find out for himself.
2. To obviate the possibility of an instructor giving his
interpretation of data which may be an alter-is of the
correct data.
Instructors should set a good example to students by
handling them with good ARC. Emphasis should be put on the
following. Tell student "You can do it". Don't tell them
they have done wrong but point out that they haven't
properly understood the data and direct them to the data
they haven't understood. When a student has done a good job
or is making good progress, tell him. Don't give a student
continuous losses, try to find something, however small,
that he has done right and point this out to him.
At all times an instructor should present an unruffled
demeanour and a clean and tidy appearance.
An instructor maintains 8C with ARC not with the
overbearing discipline of a sergeant-major. He calls the
roll, directs students where to go and arranges schedules.
He infracts infringement of course rules and students'
failure to follow instructions.
Students who are constantly failing in their studies are
missing out somewhere in their basic data so they need to
be directed to study basic material.
Remember that you are training auditors, one day you may
need one of them to audit you so make sure they know their
data and can use it.
Written & Issued by: Reg Sharpe
Course Secretary, SHSBC
for L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Cancelled by HCO P/L 27 October 1970 Issue II, The Course
Supervisor, in the OEC 1970 Year Book.]
==================
149 HCOB 22 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY TWO PREPCHECK BUTTONS
(TV5 p. 363-4, Not in New tech vols)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER AD13
(CANCELLED - see HCO B 14 Aug 64 Old Volume V p. 446)
Central Orgs
Franchise
SCIENTOLOGY TWO
PREPCHECK BUTTONS
(Cancels HCO Tech Ltr of Oct 1, AD12)
The following order and number of Prepcheck Buttons should
be used wherever "an 18 button Prepcheck" is recommended.
Do not use the old order of buttons, not because of any
danger, but these below are slightly more effective. The
old order of buttons may still be used.
The full command is usually "(Time Limiter) (on subject)
has anything been _______ or is there anything you have
been _______" for some of them which don't fit with "has
anything been _______". The (on _______) may be omitted.
The Time Limiter is seldom omitted as it leads the pc to
Itsa the Whole Track. On an RRing goal found and used in
R3SC the Time Limiter "In this Lifetime" can be used with
good effect. All Service Fac questions or Prepchecks must
have a Time Limiter.
In running R4 (R3M2), pc's actual GPMs, the goal and RIs
are Prepchecked without a Time Limiter as pc is on the
whole track anyway. But in all lower levels of auditing,
particularly when using a possible goal as a Service Fac,
the Time Limiter, usually "In this Lifetime _______", must
be used or pc will become Over-Restimulated.
For all uses the 18 Prepcheck Buttons now are:
SUPPRESSED
CAREFUL OF
FAILED TO REVEAL
INVALIDATED
SUGGESTED
MISTAKE BEEN MADE
PROTESTED
ANXIOUS ABOUT
DECIDED
WITHDRAWN FROM
REACHED
IGNORED
A FAILURE
HELPED
HIDDEN
REVEALED
ASSERTED
SOLVED
BIG MID RUDS
It will be noted that the first 9 are the Big Mid Ruds used
as "Since the Last Time I audited you has anything been
_______ ?"
A USEFUL TIP
To get the Meter clean on a list during nulling the list
the easiest system is to show the pc the list and just ask,
"What happened?" This saves a lot of Mid Ruds.
TWO USEFUL PAIRS
When trying to get an Item to read the two buttons Suppress
and Invalidate are sometimes used as a pair.
To get a pc easier in session the buttons Protested and
Decided are sometimes used as a pair.
DIRTY NEEDLE
Mid Ruds (called because Middle of Session was the earliest
use + Rudiments of a Session) are less employed today
because of the discovery that all Dirty Needle phenomena is
usually traced to the auditor having cut the pc's
communication. To get rid of a Dirty Needle one usually
need ask only, "Have I cut your Communication?" or do an
ARC Break assessment if that doesn't work. A Dirty Needle
(continuously agitated) always means the auditor has cut
the pc's Itsa Line, no matter what else has happened.
Chronically comm chopping auditors always have pcs with
Dirty Needles. Conversely, pcs with high Tone Arms have
auditors who don't control the Itsa Line and let it
over-restimulate the pc by getting into lists of problems
or puzzlements, but a high Tone Arm also means a heavy
Service Fac, whereas a Dirty Needle seldom requires Mid
Ruds or Prepchecks. It just requires an auditor who doesn't
cut the pc's Itsa Line.
THE OLD ORDER OF PREPCHECK BUTTONS
The following buttons and order were the original buttons
and may still be used, particularly if the pc is allergic
to Mid Ruds:
SUPPRESSED
INVALIDATED
BEEN CAREFUL OF
SUGGESTED
WITHHELD
PROTESTED
HIDDEN
REVEALED
MISTAKE (BEEN MADE)
ASSERTED
CHANGED (OR ALTERED)
DAMAGED
WITHDRAWN (FROM)
CREATED
DESTROYED
AGREED (WITH)
IGNORED
DECIDED
L.
RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.bh
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
150 HCOB 23 SEP 63 TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY
(TV5 p. 365-66, NTV VII p. 302-4)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1963
Central Orgs
SCIENTOLOGY 0 TO V
TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY
Due to certain pressures in the world at the end of 1962, I
deemed it advisable to speed up research as a means of
handling developing situations.
This activity proved fruitful beyond any expectations for
the period devoted to it.
To increase an already burdened personal time schedule was
not without repercussion. It was in the first place
impossible to crowd more action into the crowded hours but
somehow I did so. I cut out all social engagements, almost
all appointments and even reduced time spent talking to
students. I cancelled all lecture appearances abroad. I let
my cars and motorcycles rust and my cameras gather dust. I
kept Mary Sue up all night auditing or being audited. And
somehow, through the devotion of staff, everywhere, kept
the show on the road and handled the legal front also.
The stepped up schedule period has not ended but the golden
knowledge has been gathered in and all targets hoped for
have been exceeded.
This period has also been hard on staff, students and all
Scientologists due to shifting technology.
One of the ways of reducing research time is omitting
written records. Therefore I have relied on the Saint Hill
Course Lecture tapes to bear the burden of collecting the
data together.
On these tapes over a certain period we have a full record
of the results of this stepped up period of research.
What one is greeted with, in listening to these tapes, is a
whole new clarification of Scientology including breaking
it into progressive classes or levels of data.
Hardly any HCO Bulletins mirror this period. It is all on tapes.
A full progressive summary of Modern Scientology from the
lowest to the highest levels is to be found on the
following tapes:
24 July '63 - ARC Breaks and the Comm Cycle.
25 July '63 - Comm Cycles in Auditing.
6 August '63 - Auditing Comm Cycles.
7 August '63 - R2-H Fundamentals.
8 August '63 - R2-H Assessment.
14 August '63 - Auditing Tips.
15 August '63 - The Tone Arm.
20 August '63 - The Itsa Line.
21 August '63 - The Itsa Line (continued).
22 August '63 - Project 80.
27 August '63 - Rightness and Wrongness.
28 August '63 - The TA and the Service Facsimile.
29 August '63 - Service Facsimile (continued).
3 September '63 - R3SC.
4 September '63 - How to Find a Service Facsimile.
5 September '63 - Service Fac Assessment.
10 September '63 - Destimulation of a Case.
11 September '63 - Service Facs and GPMs.
12 September '63 - Service Facs.
17 September '63 - What You Are Auditing.
18 September '63 - St Hill Service Fac Handling.
19 September '63 - Routine 4M-TA.
24 September '63) Summary -
25 September '63) (These three lectures not yet given at time
26 September '63) of writing this HCO Bulletin.)
Additionally we have some earlier tapes that amplify the
material of the pc's Actual GPMs and the theory behind them
in:.
20 November '62 - The GPM.
28 March '63 - The GPM.
2 April '63 - Line Plot, Items.
4 April '63 - Anatomy of the GPM.
16 April '63 - Top of GPM.
Other tapes made up to 24 July 1963 carry the full story of
Implant GPMs, their patterns and handling and the Whole
Track. These have only passing importance as a pc's Actual
Goals and GPMs are a thousand thousand times more
aberrative and important than Implants. But one has to know
the extent and nature of Implant GPMs in order not to get
them confused with Actual GPMs.
The road into Scientology, the road to Clear and the road
to OT are all delineated on the tapes listed above between
24 July '63 and 26 September '63, a total of 25 tapes. (I
anticipate 3 of these lectures for this week in order to
get out this HCO Bulletin.)
Thus in 25 1 1/2 hour tapes we have a summary and
clarification and new data on Modern Scientology for all
levels and classes.
Auditing has been redefined, comm cycles have been
inspected, Service Facsimiles have been unearthed and
clarified. Most old auditing problems have been swept away
and the road has been opened.
This has been a fantastic and dramatic period in the
history and development of Scientology and I'm proud that
it came off.
And I thank you from the bottom of my heart for the floods
of congratulations that have been pouring in from
everywhere as these tapes have been released.
History has been made. Scientology is capable of fully
freeing Man.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
151 HCOPL 24 SEP 63 URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS (CANC. PER OEC)
(OEC V4 p 166-7)
[Ed. Note: DofT = Director of Training]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1963
Tech Dirs
D of Ts
Academy Instructors
Academy Students
SHSBC Instructors
SHSBC Students
URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS
Ron wants to re-write the Rules and Regulations applicable
to Courses throughout Scientolqgy. The purpose of the rules
and regulations is to enable training in Scientology to be
unhindered as far as possible by the untoward behaviour of
students and instructors and by the state of the quarters
where the instruction takes place. He therefore requires
that every Academy Staff Member and every student at present
on Course (SHSBC included) send in suggested rules under the
headings below so that a code of regulations can be drawn up.
Instructors please write:
1. Rules they consider necessary for students to abide by in
order to make instruction and admin easier.
2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by.
3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the quarters
(premises and contents) where the Course is run.
In force regarding the quarters (premises and
At least three suggestions are required under each of the
three headings.
Students please write:
1. Rules they would like their fellow students to abide by.
2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by.
3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the
quarters (premises and contents) where the Course is run.
At least twelve suggestions required under each heading.
HCO Sees are to arrange for suggestions to be written on
the reverse of a copy of this letter by every staff member
and student, and sent to me in bulk within seven days of
receipt of this letter by the HCO Sec.
Existing rules may be used as a guide.
Issued by: Reg Sharpe
Course Secretary SHSBC
for L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Attachment]
COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS
NAME: ___________ DATE: _________
State whether student or Staff position held _______
ACADEMY: ___________
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for
Students on Course.
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules
for Instructors on Course.
List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules
for quarters (premises and contents) of the Course.
Write legibly. If there is not enough room on this form use
another sheet of paper with your name on it and pin it
securely to this form.
==================
152 HCOB 25 SEP 63 ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION
(TV5 p. 367-68, NTV VII p. 305-6)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963
Central Orgs
Franchise
SCIENTOLOGY I to IV
ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION
Now that it has been established fully that a pc's gain is
directly and only proportional to Tone Arm Action, the
question of how much Tone Arm Action is adequate must be
answered.
These are rough answers based on direct observation of pcs
after sessions.
Tone Arm action is measured by DIVISIONS DOWN PER 2 1/2
hour session or per hour of auditing.
TA action is not counted by up and down, only down is used.
Usually the decimal system is used. But fractions can also
be employed. Needle falls are neglected in the computation,
only actual motion of the Tone Arm is used.
One can add up or approximate the TOTAL DOWN TONE ARM
MOTION. After a session, if an auditor is keeping good
reports of TA motion, one adds up all the divisions and
fractions of division of Down Motion (not up) and the
result is known as TOTAL TA FOR THE SESSION.
A needle gives about a 10th of a Division of motion in one
sweep across the dial but, as above, is not used in his
computation. Needle action is neglected in the add-up.
Example: As noted in the TA column of an auditor's report,
4.5, 4.2, 4.8, 4.0, 3.5 gives you .3 +.8 +.5 gives you 1.6
Divisions of TA action for that period of time. When this
is done for a full 2.5 hour session the following table
gives you a rough idea of what is expected and what will
happen to the pc.
Amount Per Session Session Rating PC Reaction
25 Divs Excellent Feels wonderful
20 Divs Good Feels good
15 Divs Acceptable Feels "Better"
10 Divs Poor Slight Change
5 Divs Unacceptable No Change
0 Divs Harmful Gets Worse
Anything from 10 Divs to 0 Divs of Down Tone Arm for a 2
1/2 hour session is something to do something about. One
gets very industrious in this range.
For a 25 hour intensive the scale of TA divisions down for
the entire intensive would be:
Amount Per Intensive Session Rating PC Reaction
250 Divs Excellent Feels wonderful
200 Divs Good Feels good
150 Divs Acceptable Feels "Better"
100 Divs Poor Slight Change
50 Divs Unacceptable No Change
0 Divs Harmful Gets Worse
The preclear's case state can be completely predicted by
the amount of TA action received in a session or an intensive.
The only exception is where the pc in running R4 (old R3)
processes can get into a "creak" of by-passed goals or RIs
which make him uncomfortable although TA action has been
good or even excellent. A case analysis will locate the
by-passed charge. On any auditing where charge has been
by-passed but TA action was good the pc's subjective
reality on gain will not seem to compare with the TA action
gotten in the auditing, but the moment the by- passed
charge is located the gain attributable to TA action will
be felt.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
153 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC (CANC PER OEC)
(OEC V4 p 168-70)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963
Sthil
HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC
Hat of Student Instructor Supervisor
1. To see that the Student Instructors know and carry
out the procedures in:
(a) Auditing Section
(b) Practical Section
(c) Theory Section
2. To act as terminal for the Student Instructors and
should necessity arise re-arrange the weekly schedule.
3. To see that the Student Instructors are on post on
time.
4. To see that the Student Instructors keep up their own
Theory and Practical Check Sheets and weekly TR drills.
5. To arrange ARC break assessments and to supervise same.
Student Instructors
Auditing Section Duties
The purpose of student instructors in the Auditing Section
is to assist the Auditing Supervisor with direct personal
observation and control of individual auditing sessions.
In order to accomplish the above student instructors have
the following duties:
1. Know in detail all the auditing activities permitted
in the section assigned.
2. Ensure that the sessions in the assigned unit are
started and ended on time, are properly located and all pcs
and auditors are present. Be sure that the auditing
schedule is being followed.
3. Check all sessions to see if auditors are following
the D of P instructions in the folder and/or the correct
auditing procedure of that unit and reporting any
digression to the instructor of that unit. The evening
student instructor may give a note to the student auditor
pointing out the error and must state the error on his
report to the auditing supervisor. No other action may be
taken.
4. Report Gross Auditing Errors to the instructor in
charge of the unit. Evening instructors note them in their
nightly report to the auditing supervisor. Gross auditing
errors are.
1. Can't read meter.
2. Don't know procedure.
3. Can't complete auditing cycle.
4. Can't complete auditing cycle repetitively.
5. Doesn't pull missed W/Hs.
6. Can't handle an ARC break.
7. Can't handle a PTP or put pc into session.
8. Chronic cutting of pc's itsa line.
5. Write up informative, helpful pink sheets covering the
whole unit. Each auditor should receive at least one pink
sheet per week. Turn completed pink sheets over to the
instructor in charge of that unit for issuing.
Write up infractions for lateness, rule breakage, refusal
to obey instructions, etc, and turn them over to the
instructor in charge of that unit for issue.
Morning student instructors report to the instructor in
charge of that unit immediately and evening student
instructors send a daily written report to the Auditing
Supervisor on all of the following conditions:
1. Failure to follow auditing directions.
2. Lack of TA action.
3. No auditing being done.
4. Any session not going smoothly. (Pc nattery and ARC breaky
with no resolution of the causes.)
5. Any suppression of data with regard to the session activity
on the auditing report.
6. Any case that looks like blowing.
7. Any excellent auditing.
8. All student auditing enquiries are handled by saying,
"Do what you are going to do", and write up an infraction
for unauthorised break.
The auditing section gives the students the reality that
they will get results by first applying the basic
fundamentals and then following exact procedure. The
student auditor can do it.
The student instructor helps them by getting them to do it.
Get the student to apply the basic fundamentals and exact
procedure and they will get results.
Auditing Supervisor
Procedure for Student Instructors
Theory Section
All the Theory Section student instructors are examiners.
Their job is to make the student knows and understands the
correct data contained in the theory material listed on the
check sheet.
1. The first thing a new student instructor does in the
Theory Section is study and get checked out on HCO Policy
Letter of February 14, 1963 - "How to Examine, Theory
Examinations", and HCO Policy Letter of March 15, AD 13 -
"Check Sheet Rating System"
2. The student instructor then gets a sheet of goldenrod
paper, a master check sheet and a testing location from the
Theory Supervisor. Put your name and the date at the top of
the goldenrod paper and use it to record the flunks and
passes for each student tested. During a lull period in the
testing and about 10 minutes before the end of the assigned
period stop your testing and record the flunks and passes
on the Master Roster and our copy of the student check sheet.
3. At the time of the check out record the results on the
goldenrod sheet, sign, date and record pass or flunk on the
student's copy of the bulletin. Sign your full surname on
both check sheets. Never use your initials.
4. Record in the master roster in the column designated
Flunk or Pass a slash mark for every pass or flunk a
student has been given. The 5th slash mark is made through
the previous 4 making a definite group of 5. In the Pass
columns the Ist 10 passes go in the Ist pass column, the 2nd
10 passes in the 2nd pass column, etc.
Never leave the Theory Section until all passes and flunks
are fully recorded on the master roster and our copies of
the student's check sheet, the master roster and check
sheet binder is never to be touched unless you are on duty
as a student instructor. No check outs are to be given
except when you are on duty as a student instructor.
6. When a student passes a bulletin say "Pass". When a
student flunks a bulletin say "Flunk".
7. If you ask a general question, be willing to get a
general answer. If you want a specific answer, ask for it
specifically.
8. Only ask enough questions to be certain that the
student knows the correct data contained on the bulletin.
This may be as few as one question or as many as 50.
9. An examiner's job is to determine whether the student
knows the data or not. If the student does, he passes. If
the student doesn't, he flunks.
10. Ask direct, straight-forward questions and keep
accurate up-to-date records, and the students will work
hard and continue winning with their theory.
Theory Section Supervisor
Practical
A Student Instructor:-
1. Calls roll promptly at 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm each day
and at 4.55 pm on Mondays. A "That's it" is given at 2.50
pm and 4.45 pm each day and at 6.0 pm on Mondays.
2. Reports any student not present at roll call to the
Training Office if the Practical Supervisor is not present.
The student must be found.
3. Sees that students are paired up immediately after
roll call. If one student is left over it must be reported
at once to the Practical Supervisor or to the Training
Office. Another student must then be sent over from Theory
or that student goes to Theory and comes over the next period.
4. Infractions. See Auditing Section Infractions.
5. Files all new pink sheets in the green folders. Files
all completed pink sheets in green folders and puts an X
through the carbon duplicates already in the green folders.
These are then put in the Practical Supervisor's top
basket. This is done every day immediately after No. 3 has
been done.
6. On Monday, student instructor chooses two chair
monitors, whose duties are to place in Chapel at 4.45 pm on
Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, approximately 9 chairs
in 9 rows leaving a gangway down the middle, 4 chairs on
the left, 5 chairs on the right (looking downwards towards
the blackboard). If television, the chairs are placed
accordingly.
7. At the beginning of each period, goes round to each
couple and marks in any check outs the student has
completed since the last practical period.
8. Knows exactly how each drill is run, and when not
checking a student out, is constantly moving from couple to
couple seeing that the drills are being run properly and
correcting any errors.
Practical Supervisor
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
156 BPL 27 SEP 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS
(OEC V4 p 171-3)
[There is a 16 Jun 74 Revision, this was changed to a BPL]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1963
Sthil
TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS
All the study in the world isn't going to make an auditor.
Learning the data and the theory of auditing is vitally
important. Perfecting your practical drills is essential.
However, the final test lies with the question, "Are you
getting results with your Pc?" Whether you are getting
results or not is totally dependent on whether or not you
are actually applying the data and theory you have learned,
and are utilizing the practical skills you have developed.
The bridge between the learning of data and development of
practical skills and their actual application in the
auditing session can be mightily bolstered by the Pink
Sheet system of Auditing Supervision.
HOW TO ISSUE PINK SHEETS
1. Put two sheets of pink foolscap size paper on a
clipboard with a carbon between.
2. At the top of the sheet write the name of the student
auditor being observed, the date and the name of the observer.
3. Head a wide column on the right hand side of the sheet
with "Observations", a narrow column to the left of centre
with "Theory and Practical Assignment" and two more narrow
columns on the left hand side with "Coach" and "Instructor".
4. Take the above with your ball point into the vicinity
of the auditing session to be observed, close enough to
hear and see what is going on without intruding in the session.
5. Write in the wide column labelled "Observations"
exactly what is happening in the session.
This is very difficult to do for most people, (especially
for someone at the case level of "only able to confront own
evaluations"). Do not look for auditing errors. Just look
and record what is happening. Do not write in evaluation.
Do not write in invalidations. Do not attempt to correct or
teach in the "Observations" columns. Simply observe the
session and record what is happening.
6. After you have filled one or more pages of the
"Observations" column, now is the time to evaluate. Study
what you have observed taking place in the session and see
if anything actually diverges from the correct theory and
practice of auditing.
7. Write in the column headed "Theory and Practical
Assignment" the date and title of the exact bulletin or
tape containing the correct data or the title of the exact
practical drill which will correct the error recorded in
the "Observations" column.
If the session observed was a complete shambles, it means
that some basic, basic fundamental of auditing is absent in
the student auditor's repertory. Don't overload the student
with tons of drills and theory assignments. Look over your
"Observations" column carefully and it will suddenly dawn
on you that this student hasn't a clue about the auditing
cycle or doesn't note the difference between the needle and
the TA on the meter. If you still can't find the main
difficulty, you can always sit the student down and ask
something like "What happens when you sit down in front of
a PC?", or "What's the meter for?" You'll be surprised with
some of the answers you'll get.
On the other hand you might find that you'll fill up a
couple of pages of pink sheet without recording any errors.
The auditor didn't happen to goof. That's fine - send it to
him without any assignment. It will still help him.
Send the top copy of the Pink Sheet to the student and file
the carbon copy in the student's Pink Sheet folder. When
the completed top copy is returned by the student, with all
the necessary signatures, throw away the carbon copy and
replace it with the completed top copy.
PINK SHEET EXAMPLES
1. The following would be a poor Pink Sheet:
Theory & Practical Assignments: | Observations.
|
TR0 | Poor TR0
Meter Reading | Auditor can't read the meter
Tape of Sep 18 '62 Aud Cycle | Lousy handling of auditing cycle
In the above example the observer has evaluated,
invalidated, only made general comments. The above may all
be true but the student auditor is not helped by them, and
the assignments don't pinpoint his major difficulty.
2. The following would be a helpful pink sheet:
Theory & Practical | Observations.
Assignments: |
| Auditor leaning on table toying
| with the TA and pen. Running "Since
| the last time I audited you" +
TR-3 | buttons. Called a speeded rise on
| "Careful of" clean. On "F to R" pc
| said "I don't think that answered
Tape of Sep 18 '62 | the question". Aud: "OK. I'll check
Aud Cycle | it on the meter". TA blew down to
| clear read on "F to R". Aud went on
| to clean "Invalidate"
In the above example the observer states exactly what is
happening in the auditing session. The majority of
observations noted show an inability to complete an
Auditing Cycle. (Even the Missed Meter read was an
incomplete cycle.) The student is therefore assigned
material that will help him learn and apply the auditing
cycle. There may be other things that can help him like
TR-0 or Meter Drills. However adding these to the Pink
Sheet will only disperse his attention which should be
applied to learning and using the Auditing Cycle.
COACHING PINK SHEETS
Pink Sheets should be coached in both Practical and Theory.
The coach first reviews the observations thoroughly with
the student and goes over and over the bulletin or drill
with the student until the correct data is completely
learned and understood or until the student can perfectly
execute the drill.
Once this is done, the coach signs his name opposite the
assignment notation on the Pink Sheet in the coach's
column. The student is then ready to have a test on the
assigned material.
CHECKING OUT PINK SHEETS
In checking out the assigned material on the student's Pink
Sheet, the instructor should carefully go over the
"Observations" with the student and have the student spot
the specific errors he has made, then have the student give
the correct data from the assigned bulletin or tape or show
by doing the practical drill that he has now mastered the
skill that was poorly applied in the auditing session.
The whole bulletin or drill should be reviewed by the
instructor but specific attention should be paid to points
that the student was observed to be weak in applying to his
auditing. Be doubly strict on these points to be sure the
student doesn't continue to make the same errors again and
again. If each Pink Sheet thoroughly corrects only one
gross auditing error, really knocks it out, the student's
auditing ability will improve markedly in a very short time.
CONCLUSIONS
Pink Sheets are never used as punishment or to make the
student wrong. They are used to improve the student's
auditing ability by having him thoroughly learn data and
practical skills he is weak in.
A student's weakness in data and skills often will not show
up under the normal conditions of theory and practical
testing but they will stick out like a sore thumb when he
has to apply them in an actual auditing session. Therefore,
a Pink Sheet Assignment does not mean that the student
hasn't learned the material if he has already passed it in
Theory or Practical. It does mean that he hasn't learned it
WELL ENOUGH to utilize it under the duress of an actual
auditing session.
If a student has gone a whole week without receiving a Pink
Sheet, he should start screaming. If his auditing is not
being observed and his weak points picked up, how does he
expect to improve? So, make a fuss, Student, if you are not
receiving Pink Sheets. And, Instructors, keep a tabulation
of when a student is issued a Pink Sheet so that you are
sure to observe each student at least once a week.
Issued by: Fred Hare
Auditing Supervisor SHSBC
for L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.aap
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
IAmended by HCO P/L 20 December 1970 (reissued & corrected
26 January 1971), Pink Sheets, which was later cancelled by
a 9 January 1973 revision of the above policy, HCO P/L 27
September 1963R, Training Technology - Pink Sheets, in the
OEC Year Books.]
==================
157 HCOB 28 SEP 63 ACTUAL GOALS
(NTV VII p. 307-11, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1963
(Amplifies HCO Bulletin of 8 May 1963)
Missions
All Saint Hill
Graduates
Scientology Four
Important
ACTUAL GOALS
(This HCO Bulletin should be of great
interest to older Saint Hill Graduates)
The actual goals and items of the preclear are several
thousand times more aberrative than implant GPMs.
I have covered the entire scope of implanted goals and
implants in general and we are fortunate to have all this
material. An auditor must know it to cope with Class IV
auditing as these implant GPMs become confused with actual
Goals Problem Masses on a meter. Further, the implanted GPM
gives the student auditor a marvelous training ground for
running actual GPMs, and it is recommended that the implant
GPM be studied and some of them run before the auditor
tries to handle actual GPMs. Furthermore, it was wise to
know all the tricks "out there" before we went. So I had to
collect them for you.
Confusion between implant and actual GPMs occurs because
the implanters used types of goals and patterns found in
actual GPMs. Implanters obviously had a knowledge, from
historical record or even research, of what a thetan's own
goals look like but obviously they never developed the data
to a workable therapy or they probably would not have
continued to be driven to such costly expedients as
continuous implanting, between lives installations, etc.
The highest level of treatment technology known to exist in
the universe before Scientology was Pictureology wherein,
at a signal from the therapist, the thetan crunched up the
engram. This is currently in use (and has been for many
trillions of years) in the Galactic Confederation. There
are few further complications to it except putting the
thetan under control with sleep lights.
Pictureology is very close to implanting. The practitioner
gets a picture of the scene of the accident, holds it
before the thetan and snaps a pair of bars, not unlike cine
clap sticks, before the thetan. The thetan eventually gets
the idea and angrily or otherwise duplicates the action of
the stick by crunching his own engram.
There are numerous kinds of traps and ways of catching and
freezing a thetan. These are categorized as Projectile
which shoot a thetan, usually with beams or lights; Luring
which cause a thetan to inspect; Pole which trap a thetan
with his own energy; Prison which imprison the thetan; and
Maze which confuse a thetan. Temperature and perhaps
chemicals are used to paralyze a thetan once caught.
All other mental activities are done by implanting. Screen
implants cause the thetan to put his pictures up on a
screen where they are misdated and scrambled. Picture
implants simply show the thetan pictures which he recoils
from or takes to be his own. Picture implants are also
occasionally filled with false dates. They give the thetan
false pasts and futures. They often repeat the actual
beginning and ending of the incident in picture form,
making it hard to get before or after the implant as one
sees pictures of his arrival and departure and so thinks he
is not into the implant or out of it. Goal implants are the
third and most serious type of implant. They take a goal
and pattern of items with left and right firing poles or jets
and implant terminals and opposition terminals. The pattern is
a too regular GPM not unlike a thetan's own GPMs. This
confuses the thetan as to his own goals and seeks to
scramble his own goals and items. The implanted GPM gets
confused into the thetan's own GPMs and often in running a
thetan's own goals and items one gets into implant goals or
items and vice versa. One only needs to straighten it out
by carefully asking on the meter if this is an installed
goal or items or an actual one.
The things one runs for gain today on the pc are:
1. R1C (Itsa Line).
2. R2T (dating somatics).
3. R2H (ARC breaks).
4. R3SC (Service Facsimile Clearing).
5. R4M2 (formerly R3M2).
Finding goals is done via R3SC.
R4M2 listing takes the first RR on the item list. The
auditor stops the pc and reads the item and says "Is this
your item" and concludes then the usual R3M2 steps.
The change of designation from R3 to R4 is to agree with
the new levels of Scientology. All Routine 3 materials are
now called Routine 4 because it belongs in Level 4 (OT).
Engram Running by Chains remains R3 and is used for this
lifetime.
R3N (Running Implant Goals) is now R4N and is otherwise
unchanged.
R4M2 is unchanged except for letting the pc itsa whether or
not the RRing item is his or her item. One doesn't let the
pc have an item that doesn't rocket read on being called.
______________
It is almost amusing to note how hard implanters work and
what overts they must feel they run up, and to note as well
that if it were not for a thetan's own Goals Problem Masses
they could effect nothing harmful. How hard they work. And
all for nothing. They are not the source of aberration.
They merely make the universe seem more unpleasant. As for
creating aberration, they could not. Sleep lights, screens,
false-picture projectors, goal implants alike are wholly
innocuous compared to the thetan's own Goals Problem
Masses. One aberrates himself. And if he did not, nobody
else could.
______________
The service facsimile is in actual fact the two top
reliable items of the last (present time) pc's actual Goals
Problem Mass. This does not prevent one from using R3SC. On
the contrary this makes R3SC work.
The pc's present time (current) goal can be used as a
service facsimile if accidentally found providing one uses
it in R3SC process with "In this lifetime" appended to
every command employed.
PROGRAMING R4M2
In programing R4M2:
1. If you find an actual correct goal of the pc, run it
only if it is the present time (latest) goal on the track.
If not, do goal oppose lists until you do find the present
time goal.
2. Unless you've done a lot of RlC and R3SC on the pc the
present time over-restimulation keeps the present time goal
(or any actual goal) from being found.
3. It is easier to find an implant goal than an actual
goal, so carefully ask about it and sort out any goal on
the meter.
4. Get the pc's actual present time GPM before you do any
R4M2 on it. Don't go listing items on a backtrack GPM.
5. Start a present time actual GPM by listing for the top
terminal. It's easier to find the top terminal, for the PT
GPM is usually truncated (incomplete).
6. Go on down through the GPM to the goal.
7. Find the next goal below the present time one. List the
present time goal as an RI to find the top oppterm of the
next goal. (Note: this step is optional. A bank can be
cleaned up without finding the next goal below. NEVER
include this step if your pc is getting less than 20 divs
of down TA per session, as you won't find the lower GPM
until you have completed the one you're working. So omit
finding next goal on low TA motion pcs and find it ollly
when all other steps are taken.)
8. Go back to the present time GPM. Read the items already
found on the line plot to the pc. Take the highest one
(nearest PT) that ticks. Complete the list from which it
came from (not the list that opposes it or it opposes).
9. Using the new item found continue R4M2 on the current GPM.
10. When no more items exist in the top (present time) GPM,
prepcheck the goal and all auditing on goals and items.
11. Go to the next GPM for which you already have the top
oppterm and continue with R4M2.
12. Use the same steps used on the present time GPM to run
and clean up each GPM in turn.
GPMs are run from the latest (nearest present time) back
down the track.
Items are found from the latest (top, nearest present time)
to earlier always.
The pc's reality is always greatest at the nearest to PT
end of any GPM, no matter how far back they are.
Overlisting lists is all that gets the pc skipping about
and into other GPMs. So keep the lists very short, 5-10
items, just until the first RR is seen. List only until the
item being listed from does not tick on test.
Keep the pc's itsa line in. Let the pc say it is or isn't
his. But don't let the pc have an item that doesn't RR.
Don't worry the pc about tone arm or auditing actions. Let
the pc run his bank, you run the session.
Do careful case analysis (ARC break lists and case
analysis lists - to be published) - when the case goes wrong.
Find lots of reliable items. If you don't let the pc have
lots, he has nothing to itsa. Therefore you get less tone
arm action.
Actual GPMs give far more TA action than implants on R4N,
the implant GPM routine that uses line plots.
The pc's own line plot is quite individual, like the
original line plot for "To Scream" in HCOBs. Implant GPMs
are all pattern (same RIs every time).
It is easy, on overlisting (or listing only by blowdown as
has been tried) for the pc to skip RIs or get into wrong GPMs.
The auditor must be careful not to run an actual GPM below
the goal as an item and into the next GPM. The only thing
that will turn off the pc's rocket read is running items
out of a GPM for which one does not have the goal.
Running a backtrack GPM before the present time GPM is run
(or skipping a GPM going back) sows the earlier line plot
with items from the missed GPM.
The pc's current actions are always explained by the pair
of items nearest present time. This is true for all GPMs no
matter how far back you've run.
The pc has only a small number of actual GPMs, less than
50. Perhaps no more than 20.
The length of the time track is infinitely greater than one
supposes. Trillions one hundred is not the start of track.
That's trillion written one hundred times.
One seldom dates in R4M2 and only then to orient some item
worrying the pc that has gotten out of place and only then
by order of magnitude of years ago.
Anything worrying the pc or reducing his capability or life
potential is to be found in actual items or goals, not in
engrams or implants. These are not primary causes. Only the
pc's own goals and items are capable of basically causing
the trouble.
The whole explanation of how an RI forms lies in the
discussions of the service facsimile and the original
explanations of the Goals Problem Mass 1962.
______________
I am sorry to have caused auditors of this period to work
so hard on R3N implant goals. But without this data and
understanding found between May and September of 1963
actual GPMs are impossible to handle as one gets into
implants. A pc's confront of his own GPMs is increased by
running implant GPMs providing TA action occurs in
sufficient quantity. After running a few implant GPMs one
comes up to contempt for their aberrative value. The pc is
lucky who has run a few before tackling his own GPMs.
THE PC's OWN GOALS AND ITEMS ARE THE FINAL ROAD TO OT.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
_