No matching fragments found in this document.
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME
SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 4
**************************************************
The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of:
1. The Old Tech Volumes
2. The New Tech Volumes
3. Confidential Material
4. BTBs
5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech
6. Anything else appropriate that we can find
They do not include
a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those)
b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately)
Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice
as much material as the old tech volumes), and because
the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the
years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each
year as a separate volume.
The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and
repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the
remaining parts to keep the size down.
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
049 HCOB 2 APR 63 DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING TAPE OF 28 MARCH 1963
(NTV VII p. 90-2, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 APRIL AD13
Central Orgs
DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING
TAPE OF 28 MARCH 1963
The diagrams attached were drawn to illustrate the tape lecture
of 28 March 1963, entitled, "The GPM."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
[Ed. There are two pages, each with two diagrams, giving a total
of 4. They are simple but not easy to reproduce, therefore we
will describe them instead.]
The diagrams mainly consist of jagged circles or clouds which
might represent mass.
[Diagram 1]
On the left a happy face with a halo above it and surrounded
by a jagged circle. On the right is another jagged circle
with its contents scratched out, although the contents are
unreadable, according to the tape the thetan with a halo is
confronting a critic. Below this is:
(a) * Purpose
(b) Purpose [ Xed out]
(c) Purpose [surrounded by a jagged circle and crossed out]
[Diagram 2]
5 pairs of jagged circles with an arrow pointed upwards running
along side of them.
At the bottom on the right is "To Be Holy".
[Diagram 3]
4 more pairs of jagged circles. The top left one contains
the words "Holy People". The top right one contains "Cr" and
the symbol for a thetan which probably, according to what is
on the tape, means "A Critical Thetan".
[Diagram 4]
5 more pairs of jagged circles. At the bottom is "To Be a
Devil" with an arror pointed to the bottom left jagged circle.
==================
050 HCOB 6 APR 63 R3M2, WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IN CLEARING
(NTV VII p. 93-6, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 APRIL 1963
Central Orgs
Missions
R3M2
WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IN CLEARING
The final object of the auditor in clearing is: TO FIND
GOALS AND RELIABLE ITEMS UNTIL ALL GOALS AND RELIABLE ITEMS
HAVE BEEN FOUND AND EACH GPM IS COMPLETE AND ALL GPMs ARE
DISCHARGED.
Now, there are many ways to do this, but finding and
discarding the pc's RIs is not one of them. The more you
get hold of RIs and say "That's not it" the more miserable
your pc will feel and the less clearing you'll get done.
You can actually fumble and grope and get wrong RIs and
fall on your head but if you continue to get RIs and put
them on the line plot the pc will eventually get them all.
The length of time it takes to make a multi-goal Clear does
not depend upon the care with which RRing RIs are found, it
depends upon the number of RRing RIs and goals found. Only
the comfort of the pc depends upon the care with which
RRing RIs are found.
It is a mechanical proposition. There is just so much
charge on a case. The case recovers when the charge is
released. "Charge" is manifested on the E-Meter in the
rocket reads contained in goals and their RIs. Charge
vanishes when RIs are found and paired.
If you understand this, much will come plain to you. The
idiocy of giving the pc an item that doesn't RR lies in the
fact that it doesn't bleed off charge, not that it will
soon lead to an ARC break.
The question is only: How many reliable items and goals can
be found on this case? Not how much time can be spent
repairing the case.
A smooth run to Clear would consist of the auditor finding
the exact top of a GPM, running out the exact RIs in it,
getting the next goal and prepchecking the goal of the bank
just cleared, all by 3M2.
But with auditors and the pcs green (and worried), is this
ideal always obtainable? The answer is, I am afraid, No.
The following is far more likely to be the case: A goal is
found. A lot of RIs are run out of its GPM. The next goal
is found. It is discovered then that half the RIs found in
the old bank belonged in this new bank. The new goal is run
and many RIs are found. The auditor then finds the 3rd goal
and many RIs in it. The auditor now discovers the top of
the first bank was missing and goes back to find it. He
does so and discovers a goal above the "first goal." He
finds it and gets RIs in it. Then to his horror finds there
is a bank two above the "first bank" found. He finds that
goal and gets RIs in it and discovers the pc's present
time. He also finds that everything the pc was groaning
about is contained in the bank that was closest to present
time. He cleans this up and then goes back down to discover
that although the goals of the lower banks no longer read,
he had never found half the RIs in any one of them. He
remedies this and only then, in succeeding banks, finds he
can smoothly carry on, cleaning up each GPM fully as he goes.
There is nothing wrong with this. When we had R2-12 it
worked well. Then we got 2-12A and wasted fantastic amounts
of time repairing 2-12, and we had few gains to show for
it. It's the same with 3M and 3M2.
The pc is far from comfortable with the auditor battering
around missing GPMs and goals.
The pc will swear he'd rather be dead. But the message is,
he'll get Clear if they keep at it on the basis of finding
RIs and goals as they can. And there'll come a day when the
pc will really shine.
Do a perfect clearing job if you can. If you can't, just
find goals and RIs and just keep going and you'll still
achieve the same end. The error is not to find lots of
RRing RIs and goals per unit of auditing time. Keep your
records well. Just barrel along. Sounds barbarous and
you'll have to get used to ARC breaks but the point is,
clearing can be done that way.
Clearing can't be done by finding an RI, getting nervous
about it, abandoning it, finding another RI, abandoning it,
fooling around whole sessions trying to find the top of a
GPM when a whole panorama of RIs exist lower down.
Find goals and RIs! Get the GPM as complete as you can but
not at the expense of not finding RIs. Yes it sounds
barbarous, and it is, but it works. Remember, you'll have
ARC breaks. Assess for why, repair it and keep going.
These are the only rules you must not violate:
1. AN RI MUST (A) RR, (B) CAUSE A TA BLOWDOWN AND (C) TURN
ON A MINIMUM OF MASS.
2. IF YOU FIND MORE THAN A DOZEN RIs WHICH DON'T MATCH THE
GOAL YOU'RE WORKING ON, THE PC'S RR AND R/S WILL SHUT OFF.
3. PRECISE, LEGIBLE RECORDS AND LINE PLOTS MUST BE KEPT.
4. IF THE PC ARC BREAKS DO AN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR
WHAT YOU FIND. DON'T DO WHAT THE PC SAYS. TAKE THE PC'S DATA
BUT ACT ONLY AFTER AN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT.
5. DON'T PREPCHECK A GOAL UNLESS YOU KNOW YOU HAVE ALL THE
RIs IN THAT GPM AND HAVE DONE THE FINAL GOAL OPPOSE LIST TO
THE NEXT GPM.
6. A LIST MUST BE LONG ENOUGH TO GIVE ONLY ONE RR ON NULLING
AND NO R/S. IT MUST BE SHORT ENOUGH NOT TO BYPASS ITEMS. IT
MUST BE LONG ENOUGH TO HAVE THE NEEDLE CLEAN ON NULLING.
IT MUST BE SHORT ENOUGH NOT TO GET A DIRTY NEEDLE THROUGH
PROTEST AND COLLAPSED MASS.
Now just how you list or find goals or repair is a broader
study, all stemming from the above.
When you gain experience you'll be able to come closer to
perfect. Meanwhile don't stall around nervously. Find goals
and RIs.
Learn to find an RI every 30 minutes of auditing time. And
then improve that speed.
There is a certain exact quantity of charge on a case. It's
contained in goals and RIs. Every goal you find deducts
from that quantity. Every RI you find and oppose deducts
from that quantity.
The more accurately you do it, the less time you'll waste
on ARC breaks and fumbling.
Accuracy itself is only important because it saves auditing
time. But accuracy can become a vice which gives one no
goals or RIs found.
I know I have said "Do it right." That's fair enough. But
I'm now saying "Do it as right as you can but do it."
At the start of his case the pc hasn't a clue. Therefore he
lists longer. His confront is at its poorest. Therefore he
fails to list the obvious.
A green auditor on 3M2 does not really believe it is all as
pat as made out. Therefore he always thinks the pc is
different.
Eventually both auditor and pc get the "hang" of the bank.
They learn that the bottom five RIs on "To Catch Catfish"
will be "A Catfish Catcher," "Somebody with the goal To
Catch Catfish," "Somebody or something with the goal to
Catch Catfish," "The Goal To Catch Catfish" and "To Catch
Catfish" (the goal as an RI). Only what each opposes is
variable. They learn that the top terminal will be
something like "Somebody Who Can't Catch Catfish." And that
the three highest oppterms from the top down will probably
be "Catfish Catchers," "Catching Catfish" and "People Who
Catch Catfish." And they know that there may be RIs, term
or oppterm, in this goal like, "Catching Catfish," "The
Inability to Catch Catfish," "People who won't Catch
Catfish," etc.
And they know then that only the low oppterms and the
middle ground are in serious question.
Give the auditor and pc the next goal and they'll list away
as usual but directly at what should be there. And it goes
like a whirlwind.
Early on, without this experience, both auditor and pc
grope, overlist, fumble about. So the first GPM run has the
longest lists and the most errors.
Clearing is not easy on the pc. It's not easy on a new
auditor. And there will be times when both rue the day they
ever got into the GPM. But if they keep going, finding
goals and their RIs, faint streaks of pre-dawn gray will
begin to gleam ahead and then, with perseverance, day will
break upon a higher plateau than man has ever dreamed of
before.
The mystics spoke of the Abyss. They said that in trying to
cross it, many fell into the darkness. Without knowing it,
they spoke of the Goals Problem Mass.
The Buddhists spoke of Nirvana. Without knowing it, they
spoke of vanishing forever into the GPM (Nirvana). They had
become completely overwhelmed, lacking meters and a map.
We are Scientologists. We won't fall into the abyss. And we
won't join Nirvana. We have meters and a map. We know the
rules and the way.
This is the greatest adventure of all time. Clearing. The
way is strewn with the skeletons and skulls of those who
have tried over the past trillenia. The bottom of the Abyss
is glutted with failures. Nirvana is choked with the
overwhelmed.
To say it is not a dangerous way would be false.
But it is not dangerous if you keep going, finding goals
and RIs, reducing the charge on the case, handling the ARC
breaks as they occur. Only the fainthearted will add any
bones to the Abyss or apathy to Nirvana.
We are Scientologists. We have won.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
051 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, LISTING AND NULLING
(NTV VII p. 97-100, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL 1963
Central Orgs
Missions
URGENT
ROUTINE 3M-2
LISTING AND NULLING
(Corrects HCOB 6 Apr. 63, R3-M2)
The most likely list ("Who or what would be most likely to
achieve this goal?") for the first GPM contacted is proving
to be longer on most pcs than was expected.
List this list by the rules of the old goal-oppose source
list, which is to say 50 items past the last RR or R/S.
You will find that on subsequent goals the list is shorter,
but it still must be complete, 50 past last RR or R/S.
A list is as long as it has to be to have a clean needle
and only one RR on the list.
On the most likely list at the beginning and the
goal-oppose list at the end of the GPM (done after it is
complete) the 50 past the last RR and R/S serves best.
The RR can be anywhere on a source list.
When you X out an item in nulling, be sure the item did not
react on the needle. To do otherwise is dishonest in the
extreme. X means no reaction on needle.
Overlisting causes a dirty needle through Protest and
Decide. Underlisting causes a dirty needle and lots of
items to react.
There are then, still 2 kinds of lists for each GPM:
1. The source list.
2. The RI oppose list.
There are only two of these "source lists."
a. The "most likely list" at the start of each GPM, done
before any RIs are found and
b. "The goal as an RI oppose list" at the bottom of the
GPM, done after all the RIs of the GPM are found.
The "most likely list" results (if completed) in a high
oppterm of the GPM. From this the remaining RIs are found.
IT IS NOT ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO DO A "MOST LIKELY" LIST IF
YOU CAN GET THE TOP OF THE GPM BY DOING "RI OPPOSE LISTS" FROM
WITHIN THE GPM ITSELF; A COMMON OCCURRENCE IN SECOND AND
ONWARD GPMs.
The "goal as an RI oppose" list at the bottom is done only
after all the RIs in the GPM are found. It results in
finding the goal of the next GPM.
Between these two are the "RI oppose lists."
The two "source lists" are long, 50 items past the last RR
or R/S, and the RI will be anyplace on them, usually an
item that did not RR when listed but RRs on nulling.
The "RI oppose lists" are relatively short. They tend to be
longer in the first and second GPMs than in later ones. But
they are never very long. They go perhaps 20, 30 items in
the first GPM, fewer in the second, as few as 5 or 10 in
the third and remaining GPMs.
The "RI oppose lists" are listed until neither the RI being
listedfrom or the question tick. This is the actual listing
rule. Just list and test the RI being listed from and the
question frequently (about every 5 items). You can add 5
for good measure or not.
Overlisting an "RI oppose list" tends to bypass RIs.
Underlisting tends to bypass RIs.
It is perfectly all right, on an overlisted list to take an
earlier RR than the last one seen on listing. Sometimes the
pc overlists and "goes around the corner" to the next RI.
This is particularly true in later GPMs. Then you have the
actual RI earlier than the last RR. It is more usual,
however, to extend the list a bit when this happens, as the
pc will put the first RI back on, now after the "next RI."
The "next RI" will not now RR and only the pc's actual RI
will RR.
Sometimes pcs argue and get ARC broke when their RI "occurs
earlier than the last RR." This, however, is an infallible
sign of an incomplete list. It needs two or three even,
non-reading items to complete it and the pc will put back
his insisted-upon RI which now is the last RRing item on
the list.
In all listing, nulling and taking RRing items off any
list, a certain amount of judgment is required. It can't
all be machinelike. But that judgment doesn't include two
RRs or one RR and one R/S firing at the same time on a
list, nor does it include giving the pc an item that "read
once on Careful Of," nor does it include not trying to get
the right RI.
A skillful auditor becomes an adept pilot in listing,
nulling, finding the pc's RI and giving it to the pc. And
in learning to become one, an auditor makes mistakes.
That's okay.
You'll also invent some shortcuts. That's okay, too, as
you'll soon find that dropping the safety factors costs you
more auditing time than you save and that the innovations
introduced come hard against the unalterable rules of
listing and nulling. Then you'll be happy to do it right,
do it well and pick up a speed that will list a whole later
GPM in a single session. All by the rules.
DOPE-OFF AND HARD LISTING
If the pc dopes off while listing, it's a missed withhold.
However, the missed withhold can also be that the question
or item being listed from is wrong or the item is not on
the list.
If a pc doesn't list brightly and easily on any list, the
pc has missed withholds or has Protested or Decided out. Or
is being listed on a wrong question or from a wrong item.
Always try to pull missed withholds first if a pc dopes off
or isn't listing well. Consider the 3M mechanics that might
be causing the dope-off second. If you're listing an RI
wrong-way-to, however, the trouble is more than boiloff.
The pc just can't do it without being whipped. So don't
force a pc to list. Find out why he can't.
NULLING LISTS
The two "source lists" are nulled by elimination. Say the
item three times, mark it in or out. When the end of the
list is reached, go back over the items left in. Go over
all items on the list, not just those that RRed. The RI you
find will seldom have RRed on listing on a "source list."
The item you will find possibly didn't RR when listed.
If a "source list" is complete, it looks like this on nulling:
A CATFISH X
A TIGER RR X
A WATERBUCK / X
A WILLOW WAND X
A GAME WARDEN X
THE WIND / RR
If a "source list" is incomplete, not only will the needle
be dirty but it nulls like this: A CATFISH /////// X
A TIGER RR ////// X
A WATERBUCK /// X
A WILLOW WAND X
A GAME WARDEN //////// X
THE WIND /////////////
You must not have more than one R/S or RR on any list
(source or RI oppose). This is invariable.
If you find an RR on a source list, you need only go on
until you are sure there is no other RR or R/S on the list
before giving the pc THE item.
Nulling the "RI oppose list" is entirely different. The
best system is:
l. Tell pc you're going to read last R/S (if any) on list
and do so. It must not R/ S or RR. If it does, continue list.
2. Tell pc you're going to read the next-to-the-last rocket
reading item on list. Do so. If it RRs, continue list.
3. Tell pc you're going to read the last rocket reading
item on list. Do so. If it RRs, say "That rocket reads." If
it doesn't RR, read the items above and below. Go up as
high as five items and down as many. If still no RR, read
earlier RRs on list. If still no RR, null the whole list by
elimination. If still no RR, retest reliable item it's
listedfrom. If it reacts, extend list until it doesn't
react. Repeat above numbered steps. If you still can't get
an instant, easily found RR, examine earlier RRs. If one
ticks, the list from which it came must be extended.
On an "RI oppose list" you almost never put ruds in on an
item to make it fire. When no RR fires without coaxing, the
list is either over- or underlisted. If overlisted, find an
earlier item that DRs on nulling and put in the three
left-hand buttons on it, Suppress, Careful Of, Fail to
Reveal. However, overlisting is rarer than you'd think, and
treat it as an underlist until it gets to looking long and
pc is getting edgy. If still no RR appears on reading to
pc, go back and find an earlier RI that ticks and extend
the list it came off from.
RRs on an "RI oppose list" should fire off right now the
moment read with no BMRs.
Factually, doing "RI oppose lists" is a piece of cake, a
walk in the park. You should get an RI every seven minutes
in the fourth or fifth GPM including administration and
session actions if you're going well.
In doing "source lists" you should get an RI off one,
listing and nulling, in about three hours in the third or
fourth GPM.
All the rules of listing the GPM are known. Any variation
in how they're set forth in HCO Bulletins comes from
observing auditors having trouble, or possible shortcuts.
All rules given about listing in any HCO Bulletin are true.
The only question has been how does one accomplish them.
The above version of R3M-2 Listing and Nulling will be
found very rapid. Only the RI oppose lists require
alertness and some care.
Auditors are making, as a general comment, far, far, far
more trouble in running a GPM than is there to be had.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
052 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, CORRECTED LINE PLOTS
(NTV VII p. 101-107, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL 1963
Central Orgs
Missions
URGENT
ROUTINE 3M2
CORRECTED LINE PLOTS
(This corrects the Line Plot in HCOB 13 Mar. 63, THE END OF
A GPM. Do not use the 13 March Line Plot. Use these instead for
study and Clear checkouts.)
LINE PLOTS
[Ed. - in the following diagram, the RIs (both oppterms and
terminals) are written in capital letters. The diagram has
arrows indicating how the items were listed, from one to
the next. The horizontal lines point from the oppterms to
the terminals. The diagonal lines point from the terminals down
to the next oppterm and are shown with "/"s because we can't
draw a true diagonal line in text mode. The horizontal lines
have comments written on them about the meter reads. Note
that the direction of the arrows and diagonals is the opposite
of that used in the earlier 13 Mar 63 lineplot.]
Goal: To Scream
Give me your goal
in a noun form, (plural).
|
|
|
| Oppterms Term
|
V Goal RRs once in 3
SCREAMERS ------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO COULD
(Top Oppterm) / NEVER SCREAM
----------------------------- (Top Terminal)
/
/ Goal RR or R/S once in 3
SCREAMING ------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO CAN'T
(Second Top Oppterm) / SCREAM
--------------------- (Second Top Terminal)
/
/ Goal RRs twice in 3
PEOPLE WHO SCREAM ----------------------> SOMEBODY WHO DOESN'T
/ LIKE SCREAMING
---------------------------
/
/ Goal RRs
LOUD PEOPLE ----------------------------> A PERSON WHO DISLIKES
/ NOISE
/--------------------------
/
/ Goal RRs 3 in 3
NOISY PEOPLE ---------------------------> A HOSTILE PERSON
/
/----------------------
/
/ Goal RRs & R/Ses
A HOSTILE AUDIENCE ---------------------> AN EMBARRASSED PERSON
EMBARRASSMENT --------------------------> A PERSON WHO WONDERS
/ IF SCREAMING IS ALL RIGHT
/--------------------------
/
/ Goal Blows Down
EMBARRASSED ----------------------------> A SCREAMER
WITNESSES /
/--------------------------
/ Goal RRs 1 in 3
/ latent or prior
PEOPLE WHO -----------------------------> SCREAMING
LIKE QUIET /
/--------------------------
/
/ Goal ticks and falls
FRIGHTENING ----------------------------> SOMEBODY WITH THE GOAL
PEOPLE / TO SCREAM
/--------------------------
/
/ Goal ticks
A FRIGHTENING --------------------------> SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING
SIGHT / WITH THE GOAL TO SCREAM
/------------------------------
/
/ Goal ticks or halts
FRIGHT ---------------------------------> THE GOAL TO SCREAM
/ (Second Bottom Terminal)
/-----------------------
/
/
BEING FRIGHTENED -----------------------> TO SCREAM
(Bottom Terminal)
(Goal as an RI)
|
Goal Clean | What Goal would
| To Scream Oppose
| (source list)
|
V
TO BE HAPPY
(Next GPM goal)
______________ [Next Page] ____________________
Goal: To Be Happy
Give me your goal
in a noun form
|
|
|
| Oppterms Term
|
V
HAPPINESS ------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO HATES TO
/ BE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
BEING HAPPY ----------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO COULD
/ NEVER BE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
HAPPY PEOPLE ---------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO COULDN'T
/ BE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
PEOPLE WHO FEEL THE --------------------> THE EFFORT TO MAKE
WAY THEY WANT TO / PEOPLE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
RESISTIVE PERSONALITIES ----------------> A HAPPY PERSON
/
/-----------------------
/
/
THE SAD WORLD --------------------------> BEING HAPPY
/
/-----------------------
/
/
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU -------------------> SOMEBODY WITH THE GOAL
SAD / TO BE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
SAD PEOPLE -----------------------------> SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING
/ WITH THE GOAL TO BE HAPPY
/-----------------------
/
/
SADNESS --------------------------------> THE GOAL TO BE HAPPY
/
/-----------------------
/
/
BEING SAD ------------------------------> TO BE HAPPY
(Goal as an RI)
|
| What Goal would
| To Be Happy Oppose?
|
V
TO DEPRIVE
______________ [Next Page] ____________________
Goal: To Deprive
Give me your goal
in a noun form, (plural)
|
|
|
| Oppterms Term
|
V
DEPRIVERS ------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO HATED
/ DEPRIVING
/-----------------------
/
/
DEPRIVING ------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO COULDN'T
/ DEPRIVE
/-----------------------
/
/
PEOPLE WHO DEPRIVE ---------------------> SOMEBODY WHO DIDN'T WANT
/ TO DEPRIVE
/-----------------------
/
/
LAWFUL SOCIETY -------------------------> A THEIF
/
/-----------------------
/
/
HAVING NOTHING -------------------------> A PERSON WHO CAN'T
/ DO WITHOUT
/-----------------------
/
/
PATHETIC PEOPLE ------------------------> A RUTHLESS COLLECTOR
/
/-----------------------
/
/
SENTIMENTAL ATTACHMENT -----------------> A DEPRIVER
/
/-----------------------
/
/
COLLECTING -----------------------------> DEPRIVING
/
/-----------------------
/
/
PEOPLE WHO HAVE THINGS -----------------> SOMEBODY WITH THE GOAL
/ TO DEPRIVE
/-----------------------
/
/
HAVING THINGS --------------------------> SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING
/ WITH THE GOAL TO DEPRIVE
/-----------------------
/
/
THE GOAL TO OWN ------------------------> THE GOAL TO DEPRIVE
/
/-----------------------
/
/
OWNING EVERYTHING ----------------------> TO DEPRIVE
(Goal as an RI)
|
| What Goal would
| To Deprive Oppose?
|
V
TO BE RICH
______________ [Next Page] ____________________
Goal: To Deprive
Give me your goal
in a noun form, (plural)
|
|
|
| Oppterms Term
|
V
THE RICH -------------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO HATED TO
/ BE RICH
/-----------------------
/
/
BEING RICH -----------------------------> SOMEBODY WHO COULDN'T
/ BE RICH
/-----------------------
/
/
PEOPLE WHO ARE RICH --------------------> SOMEBODY WHO DIDN'T
/ WANT TO BE RICH
/-----------------------
/
/
RICHES ---------------------------------> A REVOLUTIONARY
/
/-----------------------
/
/
DEFENSES -------------------------------> AN ATTACKER
/
/-----------------------
/
/
LACK OF DEFENSE ------------------------> A PERSON WHO NEEDED
/ DEFENSES
/-----------------------
/
/
A GUILTY CONSCIENCE --------------------> SELFISH ACTIONS
/
/-----------------------
/
/
REVOLUTION -----------------------------> A RICH MAN
/
/-----------------------
/
/
STARVING PEOPLE ------------------------> BEING RICH
/
/-----------------------
/
/
STARVATION -----------------------------> SOMEBODY WITH THE GOAL
/ TO BE RICH
/-----------------------
/
/
THE POOR -------------------------------> SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING
/ WITH THE GOAL TO BE RICH
/-----------------------
/
/
POVERTY --------------------------------> THE GOAL TO BE RICH
/
/-----------------------
/
/
BEING POOR -----------------------------> TO BE RICH
(Goal as an RI)
|
|
V
TO WIELD POWER
(continues down into
similar banks as above)
_____________
These line plots are a synthetic construction which I have
done to show:
1. The stable RI forms.
2. The crossover.
3. The relationship of goals to one another.
THE STABLE FORMS
The first three oppterms from the top in each GPM above are
stable forms. Any goal has these. Different goal types (be,
do, have) have slightly different three top oppterms.
A "To be Condition" goal has a "Condition," "Being
Condition" and "People Who are Condition," in that order.
The first six terminals from the bottom never vary except
as to significance of the goal. (The fifth and sixth
sometimes change places but all else is constant.) The top
three terminals vary a bit more but are quite similar to
the examples given.
There are other similarities between these banks given and
other GPMs but they are not as fixed and invariable.
An auditor should be able to look at a goal and know at
once and exactly its three top oppterms, its first six
terminals and have a good idea of the three top terminals.
The remainder of the RIs of the goal will be much more
variable.
THE CROSSOVER
The area in the center of a GPM is the crossover. This
means the RIs which cause the pc to become an opponent of
his own goal.
In at least one term and oppterm, the reason for the shift
of attitude is plain.
Pcs most easily find the crossover and are liable to try to
give the crossover of some other GPM if you bypass an RI in
the one you're working. The usual "How does this RI relate
to 'To ____' " test is almost always adequate, however.
The crossover is only important as a guide as to whether or
not you are still in the GPM. Otherwise the middle items
are not easily detected as belonging to the goal.
THE RELATIONSHIP OF GOALS
Only the first goal on the whole track is postulated
without reason. Contrary to what we earlier believed, all
other goals are closely related.
A pc's goals, listed out in chronological order, first on
the track to the one in PT (first goal contacted), give a
story. This makes it easy to locate consecutive goals once
you're in the GPMs.
The arrows above give the optimum order with which to find items.
The banks are lived in reverse order to the arrows above.
There are many more RIs to an actual GPM than those given
above, particularly later on the track (closer to PT). I
have given here just essential RIs which show the ones
always there, the crossover and the general picture.
Given these plots, if your pc just can't seem to get the
top of a bank, and "most likely lists" are difficult, get
him to figure out the top oppterm from these plots or, more
crudely, give it to him and let him work with it until you
find the RRing top oppterm. Don't waste time in clearing.
After the third or fourth bank the pc will be listing by
plot anyway.
Behavior of the goal is given for only one plot but is
similar in all line plots.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
053 HCOB 13 APR 63 R2G, ORIGINAL R2, 3GA, 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A AND OTHERS
(TV5 p. 262-3, NTV VII p. 108-9)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 APRIL AD13
Franchise
ROUTINE 2-G
ORIGINAL ROUTINE 2, 3GA, 2-10, 2-12,
2-12A AND OTHERS SPECIALLY ADAPTED
GOALS FINDING
DESIGNATION OF ROUTINES
Now that Class II Auditors may find goals, a great deal of
material about goals finding can be released to them.
Goal finding activities are now designated as follows:
ROUTINE 2-G1
Special Goals Prepcheck administered before a goal is
found. This is a refined version of the Problems Intensive,
slanted directly at goals.
ROUTINE 2-GPH
Special Goals Prepcheck done by Pre-Hav levels with a new
assessment for each button. This is a refined use of the
original Routine 2.
ROUTINE 2-G2
Listing and nulling goals lists, using Left-Hand Buttons on
last ones in and Big Mid Ruds on the final goal left in.
Done in short lists, a couple pages listed and nulled at a
time. This is a refined version of the oldest goals finding
process.
ROUTINE 2-G3
Using any Items ever found on pc to list goals against, and
using the method of R2-G2 to find the goal. This is a
refined version of 3-GA and 3-GAXX and also uses all 2-10,
2-12 RIs ever found.
ROUTINE 2-G4
Listing special lists for RSing or RRing Items without
nulling and using the RSing or RRing Items seen on listing
to list goals against. This is a new use of 3D, 3GA, 2-10,
2-12.
ROUTINE 2-G5
This is Routine 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A wherein everything known
about or gained by those processes is used to find RIs and
list goals against all RIs found.
It can be seen from the above that everything known about
the original Routine 2 and goals finding is now reworked
into these Routine 2-Gs for rapid and positive goal finding
by Class II Auditors.
Subsequent HCO Bulletins will detail each of these routines
in turn. They are quite stable as processes and have been
in use for some time.
Note: Everything released or known about Routines 2-10,
2-12 and 2-12A is valid, and the results of these on
preclears and any RI ever found on a preclear is used for
the purpose of listing goals and finding the preclear's
goal. None of this material or study of it has been wasted.
Any RI ever found on a pc is useful in goals listing.
Further, every Problems Intensive brought the pc closer to
his or her goal and an easier run on Routine 3 processes.
Whereas R2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A worked in their own right,
they are even more useful in finding goals. The only danger
of 2-10, 2-12 and 2-12A was: If too many RIs were found
without finding the pc's goal for that GPM, the ability of
the pc to RR and RS would shut off. The RR and RS turn back
on the moment the goal for that GPM is found.
A close study of the R2-Gs is necessary to their
workability. And needless to remark, the only reason any
Scientology process works lies in adherence to the highly
specialized auditing skill of Scientology with its TRs and
complete attention to the precise form of the session itself.
Without this pure auditing form, Scientology processes will
not work. Scientology processes do not work when
administered outside the Auditor's Code and without
skillfully practiced TRs. The loose "disciplines" of
psychoanalysis, psychiatry, medicine and psychology are
completely inadequate in the administration of Scientology
processes. Completely aside from the fact that Scientology
does not address healing, no psychologist, psychiatrist,
psychoanalyst or medical doctor is authorized to use
Scientology by reason of a medical or philosophical degree.
Only a fully qualified auditor, properly certificated by an
authorized Academy may lawfully use Scientology processes
or data.
Only auditors trained to the level of Class II may use
Routine 2 processes.
Routine 2 and Routine 3 processes are designed for use in
clearing the human spirit and are not to be used in healing
or physical treatment.
HGCs may only clear and may not otherwise apply Scientology
processes.
The public is warned not to accept Scientology processing
except from Academy trained auditors and is additionally
warned not to embark on being cleared except by a properly
certified auditor in consultation with a Class IV clearing
consultant. The rewards of clearing are enormous. The
perils of clearing in unskilled hands are too numerous to
mention.
It is with these understandings that the Routine 2-Gs are
released to Class II Auditors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
054 HCOPL 13 APR 63 POLICY OF HGCS
(OEC V4 p 565)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 APRIL AD 13
CenOCon
Franchise
POLICY OF HGCs
Due to the workability of current technology, the following
policy is laid down for all Hubbard Guidance Centres
throughout the world.
HGCs MAY ONLY CLEAR
HGCs WILL ENDEAVOUR TO CLEAR HGC PRECLEARS. NO OTHER
DIRECTION OF PROCESSING WILL BE UNDERTAKEN. ONLY PROCESSES
DIRECTLY CONTRIBUTING TO CLEARING THE HGC PC WILL BE USED
IN AN HGC.
This should be well disseminated as a policy and should be
posted in the registrar's office and on the public bulletin
board. The processes envisioned are.
1. Preparatory processes to get the pc into session;
2. Prepchecking to obtain the pc's goal;
3. Obtaining a pc's goal;
4. Clearing a GPM;
5. Completing a GPM;
6. Obtaining new goals,
7. Clearing the new GPMs;
8. Completing the GPMs
Secure and workable technology now exists to accomplish
each one of the above.
HGC Auditors must become expert at this technology and be
well supervised in its execution.
Any and all earlier Auditing any HGC pc has had is now
contributive to clearing, giving many Items on which
goals can be found and smoothing the way.
No registrar may promise or sell any particular technique.
This is entirely at the discretion of the HGC.
The prospective preclear must be warned as follows:
"Clearing is not easy to do and it is not easy on the
preclear. We must be sure that you realize this before we
undertake your clearing."
Any and all requests for "healing treatment" must be
refused. It should be made very plain that HGCs only Clear.
Clearing has been described in various literatures and the
prospective preclear should be referred to these or told
what clearing is.
The earliest Earth hopes for clearing were uttered about
ten thousand years ago. For the first time we are able to
accomplish this for all cases on whom a goal may be found.
All clearing is conditional to finding the pc's basic
purpose. The difficulties of this should not be minimized.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
055 HCOB 17 APR 63 R3M2 REDO GOALS FOUND ON THIS PATTERN
(Not in either set of tech volumes, previously considered confidential)
[This is the HCOB left out of new tech vol 7 because it was cancelled
and replaced by HCOB of 28 Apr 63. They ignored the fact that it was
reinstated and corrected by HCOB 14 July 63 as being the line plot for
the aircraft, bear, and gorrilla goals (but not for Helatrobus which
is the series plotted by the 28 Apr 63 & later corrections).
Besides being corrected by the 14 July HCOB, there were further
corrections in the 24 July HCOB which was also omitted from the
tech vols - Ed.]
[This was posted by Scamizdat. An almost identical version is
in a pseudo tech volume of confidential materials. The differences
are that it has "Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex" in place
of "1812 ... D.C." and only LRH:jr in the initials line at the end]
[We have noted the later changes for ease of use]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
1812 19th St., N.W., Washington 9, D.C.
HCO BULLETIN OF APRIL 17, AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
R3 - M2
RE-DO GOALS FOUND ON THIS PATTERN
A COMPLETE GPM PATTERN
(Replaces all former Line Plots)
This is the first actual Goals Problem Mass pattern
released. All earlier published patterns were synthetic.
I went back 216 Trillion to obtain this pattern for a GPM
and to find out if it was safe to try to run an early GPM
in a human body. It is.
The pattern is probably completly correct but there may be
a transposition or adjustment necessary, such as the way
"NO" is expressed - Not-non-absence etc.
By evidence to hand, all GPMs contain all these early and
late endings. It is permissable (indeed imposible to do
otherwise) for the pc to list this pattern to hand and the
auditor must use it to help the pc. No pc is ever going to
confront the whole of a GPM early in processing.
RR markings refer to how goal reads on being called 3 times
to pc. All RIs read with RR when called to pc once.
PATTERN OF A VERB GOAL
Give me your goal
as a final accomplishment
[The HCOB has horizontal lines with arrows pointing from the
Oppterm to the Terminal, an diagonal lines pointing from the
terminal down to the next oppterm.]
OPPTERMINALS TERMINALS
RI NOUNAL ACCOMPLISHMENT ---> NO TOP OPPTERM RI
OF GOAL g - 1 RR g - 1 RR 1 F
RI GOALING ---> NO GOALING RI
g - 1 RR g - 1 RR
RI GOALERS ---> NO GOALERS RI
g - No Read g - 1 RR
RI GOALINGNESS ---> NO GOALINGNESS RI
g - No Read g - 1 RR
RI GOALISHNESS ---> NO GOALISHNESS RI
g - No Read g - 1 RR
RI GOALIVITY ---> NO GOALIVITY RI
g - 1 RR 1 DR g - No Read
RI BEINGS (PEOPLE) (THOSE) ---> A BEING (SOMEONE) RI
WHO GOAL g - 2 RRs WHO NEVER GOALS
g - 1 RR 1 DR
( changed to A BEING WHO IS
NEVER GOALING per 14 July HCOB)
RI ACTIVE GOALING ---> A BEING (SOMEONE) RI
g - 2 RRs WHO MISEMOTIONS TO GOAL
g - 1 DR
RI THE NECESSITY OF GOALING ---> A BEING (SOMEONE) RI
g - 1 RR WHO DIDN'T WANT TO GOAL
g - 1 RR
RI THE ACTIONS OF GOALING ---> A HATRED OF GOALING RI
g - 2 RRs g - 1 RR
RI ANY FERVENT BELIEF IN ---> A NON GOALER RI
GOALING g - 2 RRs
g - 1 RR
RI FERVENT BELIEVERS IN ---> A BEING (SOMEONE) RI
GOALING THAT GOALING EXHAUSTED
g - 1 RR 2 DRs g - 1 RR
(ANY FERVENT BELIEVERS IN
GOALING per 14 July HCOB)
RI THE VAST VALUE OF GOAL ---> AN EXHAUSTED RI
NOUNS GOALER
g - 2 RRs g - 1 RR 2 DRs
RI DEMANDED GOAL NOUNS ---> A BEING (SOMEONE) RI
g - 2 RRs WHO HAD TO GOAL
g - 2 RRs
RI OBSESSED GOAL ACTION ---> A BORED GOALER RI
g - 1 RR g - 1 RR 1 DR
RR Blow down on goal (position approximate)
RI INTEREST IN GOALING ---> A SECRET GOALER RI
g - No Read g - 1 F
RI A KNOWLEDGE OF GOALING ---> A VICIOUS GOALER RI
g - 3 Ticks g - 2 RRs
RI COUNTER GOAL ACTION ---> A DETERMINED GOALER RI
g - 2 RRs g - 2 Ticks
RI PROHIBITIONS AGAINST ---> HAVING TO GOAL RI
GOALING g - 2 RRs g - 1 RR
RI DETESTERS OF GOALING ---> A GOALER RI
g - 1 RR g - 2 DRs
RI THE HOPELESSNESS OF GOALING ---> GOALING RI
g - 1 RS g - No Read
RI THE ABSENCE OF GOALING ---> SOMEBODY WITH THE RI
g - No Read GOAL TO GOAL
g - No Read
RI NO GOALISHNESS ---> SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING RI
WITH THE GOAL TO GOAL
g - No Read
RI THE NON-EXISTENCE OF GOALING ---> THE GOAL TO GOAL RI
g - No Read g - No Read
RI SOME BAD CONDITION ---> TO GOAL RI
DEPENDENT ON NEXT GOAL g - No Read
g - No Read (but reads as
an RI)
( change per 14 July HCOB to |
<next goal> NO or NOT <this goal> ) |
|
| Who or what
| would To Goal
| oppose
V
Next lower goal
POINTS OF INTEREST
The oppterminals gradually increase as the goal is lived,
to become the goal. The terminals decrease as lived until
goal is repugnant.
Each Terminal and each oppterm contains a form of the goal.
There are neither terminals nor oppterms that contain
entirely different words.
The lower terminals have no slightest variation in any bank.
The upper oppterms contain no slightest variation from the
pattern in any bank.
Only the middle ground of the GPM may vary but always has
some form of the goal itself.
If you make an error in following this pattern or fail to
get the right RI your pc's RR will get shorter and vanish
on the next 3 or 4 RIs.
This is for a verb goal such as "To Scream". It is also the
same for a "To Be" goal form.
This will hold good for all goals and all GPMs.
Any corrections and patterns for other goal forms will be
released as fast as I find them. I do not guarantee there
are not more RIs in a GPM.
The following is the goal from which the above pattern was
taken, given to assist further understanding.
TO CREATE. Found April 14, 1963 All Items found April 15, 1963
LINE PLOT
Opposition Terminals Terminals
RI CREATION NO CREATION RI
g - 1RR 1RR 1F
RI CREATING NO CREATING RI
g - 1 RR 1RR
RI CREATORS NO CREATORS RI
g - No read 1RR
RI CREATINGNESS NO CREATINGNESS RI
No read 1RR
RI CREATIONISHNESS NO CREATIONISHNESS RI
No read 1RR
( CREATINGISHNESS per 14 July HCOB)
RI CREATIVITY NO CREATIVITY RI
1DR No read
RI BEINGS WHO CREATE A BEING WHO NEVER RI
2RRs CREATES
1RR 1DR
RI ACTIVE CREATING A BEING WHO HATES TO RI
2RRs CREATE
1DR
RI THE NECESSITY OF CREATING A BEING WHO DIDN'T WANT RI
1RR TO CREATE
1RR
RI THE ACTIONS OF CREATING A HATRED OF CREATING RI
2RRs 1RR
RI ANY FERVENT BELIEF IN A NON-CREATOR RI
CREATING 2RRs
1RR
RI FERVENT BELIEVERS IN CREATING A BEING THAT CREATING RI
1RR 2DRs EXHAUSTED
1RR
RI THE VAST VALUE OF CREATIONS AN EXHAUSTED CREATOR RI
2RRs 1RR 2DRs
RI DEMANDED CREATIONS A BEING WHO HAD TO RI
2 RRs CREATE
2RRs
RI OBSESSED CREATIONS A BORED CREATOR RI
1DR 1RR 1DR
RI INTEREST IN CREATING A SECRET CREATOR RI
No read 1F
RI A KNOWLEDGE OF CREATION A VICIOUS CREATOR RI
3tics 2RRs
RI COUNTER CREATION A DETERMINED CREATOR RI
2RRs 2tics
RI PROHIBITIONS AGAINST HAVING TO CREATE RI
CREATIONS 1RR
2RRs
RI DETESTORS OF CREATING A CREATOR RI
1RR 2DRs
RI THE HOPELESSNESS OF CREATING A CREATING RI
1RS No read
RI THE ABSENCE OF CREATING SOMEBODY WITH THE GOAL RI
No read TO CREATE
No read
RI NO CREATISHNESS SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING RI
No read WITH THE GOAL TO CREATE
No read
RI THE NON-EXISTENCE OF CREATING THE GOAL TO CREATE RI
No read No read
RI HAVING NO GAME TO CREATE RI
No read No read
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jr:jr&jb
Copyright (c) 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
056 HCOB 18 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, DIRECTIVE LISTING
(NTV p. 110-2, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 APRIL AD 13
Central Orgs
Missions
URGENT
ROUTINE 3M2
DIRECTIVE LISTING
DIRECTIVE LISTING is defined as that Routine 3 activity
which directs the pc's attention while listing to the form
of the inevitable reliable item, providing it can be predicted.
This is a new departure in Scientology auditing. It could
be a dangerous one if carried into directing goals or
Routine 2-12 RIs. It applies therefore only to the
inevitable reliable items to be found in Routine 3 line plots.
It is so much more upsetting to the pc and clearing to miss
the right RI that the practice is excused.
Indeed it must be done.
The law governing this is:
A PC'S ABILITY TO CONFRONT IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE
AMOUNT OF CHARGE REMOVED FROM THE GPMs; THE PC'S ABILITY TO
CONFRONT IS NOT PROPORTIONAL TO THE AMOUNT OF CONFRONTING
DONE IN A GPM.
There are only a few things to be careful of in directive listing:
1. That the charge (if any) of the question being listed
from is also listed off even when the right item has been
directed on to the list;
2. That the auditor does not let himself be persuaded out
of getting the right RI on the list; 3. That the directed
RI does actually fire with an RR when called regardless of
mid ruds or TD; 4. That the directed RI is the right RI for
that list;
5. That that part of the line plot not common to all cases
may not be directed on to a list by the auditor.
Definitions: A directed reliable item is one guided on to
the list by the auditor. It is one derived from the form of
the GPM common to all cases.
_____________
HOW TO DIRECT LISTING
The auditor knows that in every GPM (except truncated ones
which, being the 1st GPM from present time, may have the
top missing) the majority of the RIs are common to all
GPMs. (See HCO Bulletin of 17 April 1963, A COMPLETE GPM
PATTERN, and subsequent line plots.) Most of these,
particularly top and bottom groups, never change.
Therefore the auditor, with the pc's help, determines what
the inevitable RIs should be, confirms it with the meter,
gets the charge off the question by getting some more items
on the list and gives the pc the right RI for that point in
the bank or works with the pc to obtain that exact RI.
The first command that starts a new GPM being audited is:
"Give me the ultimate achievement of your goal in a noun form."
Get several of these nouns. One will consistently RR.
That's the pc's RI. Give it to the pc.
Do not overlist. Do not compromise with these rules.
The top terminal is then gotten by the question "Who or
what would oppose (noun form you just got)." Get the right
one by suggesting its probable form to the pc. Get the
charge off the question. Do not overlist. (You must stop
pc's listing on RI oppose lists and check the question.)
You then go through the proper 3M2 steps for tests, etc.
Give pc the right top terminal that has been found.
List "Who or what would (top terminal) oppose?" Suggest it
to the pc as it is known. Make sure the 2nd top oppterm
gets on the list. Etc., etc.
_____________
THE PROBLEM
If you don't select for the pc the inevitable RIs as you
list them, the chances of the pc getting them in the first
3 GPMs is so remote as to be nonexistent. The pc will go
through agony if they're missed, and you'll lose his or her
RR as this is the roughest part of the GPM. Further, their
undischarged mass will be carried down into all additional
auditing and the pc will not lose the mass and may gain
weight. And you've set the stage for ARC breaks galore.
Further this gives you the rightness of the goal at once
with no mess-up of the pc by reason of long listing. (If
the obvious top oppterm isn't there it either isn't the
goal or is a truncated GPM).
_____________
DIRECTING RIs
An auditor must become expert at preselecting RIs for any
given goal.
Study HCOB 17 Apr. 63, A COMPLETE GPM PATTERN, and
subsequent issues. If the pc ARC breaks or starts getting a
dirty needle after you've given him a selected RI, you've
bypassed one.
[The NTV has an Editor's Note: "HCOB 17 Apr. 63 A
COMPLETE GPM PATTERN was cancelled by HCOB 23 Apr. 63 R3
-M2." Note that their note was incorrect since this HCOB
was later reinstated as the pattern for the Bear Goals etc.]
But pcs will protest their top terminal quite often as
discreditable. So it's discreditable. Does it RR and
discharge the top oppterm? If so, it's the pc's. Give it to
the pc and the pc will cognite and the TA will blow down.
If it's still wrong, you'll soon run out of RR as you find
more RIs.
There are no GPM RIs above the top terminal or oppterm as
shown on line plots for any given GPM.
But there may be another full GPM.
A recently, only partly formed GPM has no top.
If a GPM has its top complete, there's probably another
goal above it (nearer present time).
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
057 HCOPL 19 APR 63 HANDLING ORG TECHNICAL QUERIES
(OEC V4 p 36)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 APRIL 1963
CenOCon
HANDLING ORG TECHNICAL QUERIES
With the new technical reports being handled now by the
Deputy HCO Exec Sec WW, it is not intended that technical
queries be included. These reports are Progress reports.
All Org technical queries should be well within the scope
of being handled by the Org Technical Director.
If the Org Technical Director is unable to handle a
particular query, he should always endeavour to settle the
matter by telex with the senior Technical Director within
his continent or with his Continental Director.
In the very rare instances where a technical query cannot
be settled locally, a despatch should be sent to Ron by the
senior Continental Technical Executive stating the matter
briefly and it will be handled immediately.
Issued by: Robin Hancocks
Deputy HCO Executive Secretary WW
Authorized by:
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:gl.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
058 HCOB 23 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, HANDLING THE GPM
(NTV p. 114-7, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1963
Missions
ROUTINE 3M2
HANDLING THE GPM
Goals Problem Masses may be handled in several ways. The
only things that establish the best way are:
l. Speed of finding RIs.
2. Accuracy of RIs found.
3. Completeness of GPM's RIs.
4. Correct order of RIs.
5. Pc's morale.
6. Easiness of the method on the pc.
7. Ease of handling by the auditor.
8. Resulting state of Clearness of the pc.
Immediately discounted then are those methods which put
speed of finding RIs second, for it will be found that the
slower you find RIs, the more the remaining factors above
will suffer.
I have been over or through, as a pc, almost any method of
auditing a GPM there could be, and the one factor that
stands out to me, both as an auditor and a pc, as well as a
Case Supervisor, is that idling about trying to get it all
now results in the destruction of both auditor and pc
morale and consumes unrewarding session time. Why? The law
that covers this is: A PC'S ABILITY TO CONFRONT IS DIRECTLY
PROPORTIONAL TO THE
AMOUNT OF CHARGE REMOVED FROM THE GPMs; THE PC'S ABILITY TO
CONFRONT IS NOT PROPORTIONAL TO THE AMOUNT OF CONFRONTING DONE
IN A GPM.
This is a very important rule. In practice it means, "Get
all the RIs you can discharged as fast as you can." It also
could mean "Get all the GPMs discharged as fast as you
can." But if this last means discharging partially many
GPMs it ceases to be true as the pc will go into hopeless
confusion in the remaining charge.
It does mean:
l. Discharge the GPM you are working on as fast as you can,
regardless of skipping some RIs, regardless of reaching the
top first.
2. Don't keep scrapping RIs found just because there may be
some higher than those you are finding (later).
3. Don't let the pc flounder hopelessly in some area of the
GPM that can't be gotten just yet.
4. Keep a line plot of each block of RIs you find. Join
them up later.
You have a pattern. You will be able to follow it easily
most of the time. But where you cannot get the pattern to
go right, jump to another lower part of the pattern where
it will go right and go on with it. You will find it isn't
the wrongness of the pattern that gives you trouble.
It's the inability of the pc to confront. Answer: remove charge.
Because the pc ARC breaks on missed RIs, tell the pc "We're
going to miss some items.
Those already found are valid. We're going to get some
lower ones and get the charge off and then come back for
what we've missed." The pc won't ARC break. On the contrary
his morale will increase in most cases.
And then, of course, with the GPM shot full of holes, the
pc can confront better.
And the second pass through the GPM will get some of the
missing ones. And the third pass will assemble the lot.
The only things to avoid are getting the pc confused by too
many shifts and dizzy through invalidation of existing RIs
already found.
The rules for this method of handling are these:
l. Always start at the top or as close to the top as you
can and go down (earlier in time) through the GPM. This is
true for every pass through the GPM.
2. Don't let the pc flounder endlessly searching. If it
seems all you can do is flounder, go lower to another known
part (by pattern) of the bank and get going again.
3. Realize that the final pass through will find all RIs
RRing again as they are put in proper order on the final
line plot. The RR travels from top oppterm to top terminal
and right on down to the "goal as an RI" terminal. This RR
has to be passed through the complete, finished bank as the
last action of assembly of the final line plot. (Even
though they RR again when put in their right places, they
are mostly discharged by the original finding.)
4. Use all sections found already as blocks of RIs. Don't
try to find them again. The RR has to be passed through
them as they are joined up and they may get
corrected, but don't throw away sections found.
5. The pc suffers from CHARGE on the bank, not from
significance of RIs.
Significance gives the details of the aberration but its
magnitude is established by charge.
6. It can be assumed that two fast passes through a GPM and
a final assembly pass will do more to clear the GPM than
one painfully slow, fumbling pass, where the pc's efforts
are always getting invalidated.
7. All RIs must RR when found or no charge comes off. (See
note below.)
8. The pattern of a GPM is used throughout to help guide the pc.
9. Do not redo a block of RIs already found until the whole
GPM has been covered at least once through.
_____________
HANDLING THE GOALS PROBLEM MASSES
You will almost never get the GPM that is nearest PT as the
pc's first goal found. This goal is usually the most
offerable goal by its own wording. Very secret or very
blatantly offerable type wordings are found first, forced
into view by their top terminals or oppterms.
Therefore, do not assume ever that the pc's first goal is
the PT goal. It almost never is.
The actual PT area goal contains all the pc's hidden
standards and chronic present time problems. Therefore one
must attain and run it eventually before getting earlier
track goals.
Rule: A GPM which has its top oppterm and terminal is
rarely the PT GPM.
Thus these steps apply:
1. Run the goal you first find on the pc if it's a right
goal (has a GPM).
2. Clean it up very carefully as per this or later HCO Bulletins.
3. Do not oppose the final "goal as an RI" RI at the bottom
of the bank ("What goal would (goal) oppose?"). Leave that
RI firing.
4. Leave the lowest (lst bottom) oppterm of the goal with
whatever RRs. Do not adjust it as you will eventually have
to. (It depends on the next lower goal which remains
unknown at this time.)
5. Leave the lower (earlier) GPM strictly alone for now,
regardless of pc's interest in it.
6. Do the top source list of the GPM you have just run
"What goal would oppose (goal whose GPM you ran)."
7. Find the next GPM (closer to PT) goal.
8. Handle completely the later GPM as per this HCO Bulletin
or later advices.
9. Do a "What goal would oppose (one you just handled)?"
10. Handle GPM found.
11. Eventually by this method find the PT GPM and handle it fully.
12. When you are completely certain you have the PT GPM
(pc's current life name or person is part of it and its top
may be missing-truncated) and have handled it fully, trace
back through all RIs and earlier banks found and only then
prepcheck these goals as you complete them on the way down.
13. Reach eventually the first goal ever found on the pc
but not handled. Do its RI oppose list and find the earlier
goal. Adjust the bottom RI of the first goal ever found on
the pc. Prepcheck the goal.
14. Handle the next earlier GPM (for which you have just
found the goal) fully as per this HCO Bulletin or later
advices.
15. Continue earlier and earlier in the GPMs, handling each
one fully before getting the next until you reach Time Zero
for GPMs.
DO NOT CONTINUE to go earlier with GPMs until you have
handled everything up to PT. Avoid even finding the goal of
the earlier GPM (step 3 above) until you are ready to run
that whole GPM.
The charge on early GPMs is fantastic and the more GPMs
unhandled later on the track (nearer PT) the harder it is
on the pc to go into earlier (further from PT) GPMs.
The pc drags the P.T GPM and others near it that have not
been run through earlier GPMs if they are prematurely handled.
The method is summed by:
1. Get a goal.
2. Handle the bank of the goal you get.
3. Get to PT GPM by GPM, handling each as you go.
4. Smooth and prepcheck goals on the way down.
5. Then head for the earlier track.
Violations of this method will account for any casualties
suffered in running R3.
Violations will occur as the whole pressure of the pc's
interest is on earlier track and pc's sell hard to handle
the earlier banks. But whatever the sales talk, it is very
hard on the pc and auditor to go into GPMs earlier on the
track than the first goal found before later GPMs are all
handled and fully discharged.
The pc, finding himself with the earlier goal found in
violation of Step 3 above of the 15 Steps will be so
interested in it that he or she will try to move heaven and
auditors to run it, not to go forward toward PT.
Auditors unable to find goals closer to PT will go back and
run it. Well, if you do, do a good job of it and then try
to get to PT. But you'll wish you'd tried harder to get the
banks upward toward PT, not back down toward the beginning
of track.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
_