No matching fragments found in this document.
The
Technical Bulletins
of
Dianetics and Scientology
by
L. Ron Hubbard
FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
Volume
VIII
1972-1976
_____________________________________________________________________
I will not always be here on guard.
The stars twinkle in the Milky Way
And the wind sighs for songs
Across the empty fields of a planet
A Galaxy away.
You won't always be here.
But before you go,
Whisper this to your sons
And their sons -
"The work was free.
Keep it so."
L. RON HUBBARD
[pic]
L. Ron Hubbard
Founder of Dianetics and Scientology
EDITORS' NOTE
"A chronological study of materials is necessary for the complete
training of a truly top grade expert in these lines. He can see how the
subject progressed and so is able to see which are the highest levels of
development. Not the least advantage in this is the defining of words and
terms for each, when originally used, was defined, in most cases, with
considerable exactitude, and one is not left with any misunderstoods."
-L. Ron Hubbard
The first eight volumes of the Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and
Scientology contain, exclusively, issues written by L. Ron Hubbard, thus
providing a chronological time track of the development of Dianetics and
Scientology. Volume IX, The Auditing Series, and Volume X, The Case
Supervisor Series, contain Board Technical Bulletins that are part of the
series. They are LRH data even though compiled or written by another.
So that the time track of the subject may be studied in its entirety,
all HCO Bs have been included, excluding only those upper level materials
which will be found on courses to which they apply. If an issue has been
revised, replaced, or canceled, this has been indicated in the upper right-
hand corner along with the page number of the issue which should be
referred to.
The points at which Ron gave tape recorded lectures have been indicated
as they occurred. Where they were given as part of an event or course,
information is given on that event or course on the page in the
chronological volumes which corresponds to the date. The symbol "**"
preceding a tape title means that copies are available from both
Publications Organizations. A tape preceded by "*" means that it will soon
be available. No asterisk (*) means that neither Publications Organization
nor Flag has a master copy of that lecture. If you have, or know anyone who
has, copies of these tapes, please contact the Flag Audio Chief, P.O. Box
23751, Tampa, Florida, 33623, U.S.A. The number in the tape title is a code
for the date; example: 5505C07-55 = year, 1955; 05 = month, May; C = copy;
07 = day, 7th; 7 May 1955. The abbreviation tells what group the tape is a
part of. For an explanation of the abbreviations see Volume X, page 539.
At the back of this volume is a Subject Index covering only the
material in this volume. Use the index to locate the LRH source material in
context, don't just get data from the index. This index has been combined
with indexes from other volumes to form the Cumulative Index which is in
Volume X, starting on page 287.
TECHNICAL BULLETINS
1972-1976
CONTENTS
1972
1 Jan.RA L IX Hi-Lo TA List Revised (revised & reissued 20
Nov. 1974)
2 Jan. WC1 Comes First (W/C Series 30) 10
3 Jan. C/Sing Checklist (C/S Series 69 Addition) 11
7 Jan. Training and Interning Staff Auditors 12
14 Jan. Study Correction List (canceled-see Vol. IX, 329) 16
20 Jan. PTS RD Addition 19
22 Jan. Drugs & Trippers (reissue of 23 Sept. 1968) Vol.-258
3 Feb. R6EW-OT III No Interference Area 20
15 Feb. False TA Addition 2 24
16 Feb. Talking the TA Down Modified (C/S Series 74) 25
18 Feb. False TA Addition 3 26
22 Feb. Word Clearing Method 4 (WIC Series 32R) (revised 26 Mar.
1972)
(revised-see 301) 28
24 Feb. Word Clearing OCAs (C/S Series 71A) 30
26 Feb. Word Clearing Series 15R 32
26 Feb. LRH Model Tape Sessions (26 Feb. 1972) 33
29 Feb.R False TA Checklist (revised 23 Nov. 1973) (revised-
see 417) 34
1 Mar. Establishment Officer Series Lectures (1 Mar.-6 Mar. 1972)
36
13 Mar. Production and Establishment-Orders and Products
(EstO Series 5) (HCO PL) 37
16 Mar. What is a Course-High Crime (HCO PL) 41
23 Mar. Full Product Clearing Long Form (EstO Series 11) (HCO PL)
44
24 Mar. HAS Specialist and Establishment Officer Auditing Program
(Revised) (revision of 20 Nov. 1971) 50
26 Mar. Word Clearing Method 4 (W/C Series 32R) (revision of
22 Feb. 1972) (revised-see 301) 28
27 Mar.R Course Supervisor Correction List-Study Corr List 2R
(revised 3 Dec. 1974) 52
27 Mar.RA Auditor Correction List-Auditor Recovery (Study Corr
List 3RA)
(revised & reissued 17 Dec. 1974) 60
30 Mar. Primary Correction Rundown-First Cramming Correction
(Study Series 5) (revised-see 133) 65
30 Mar. Expanded Dianetics Lectures (30 Mar.-7 A pr. 1972) 67
31 Mar. Expanded Dianetics Series 1 (revised-see 87) 68
2 Apr.RB L3 EXD RB-Expanded Dianetics Repair List (Exp. Dn.
Series 3RB)
(revised 17 Mar. 1974) 70
3 Apr. Re: Study Series 5 see
footnote- 67
1972 (cont.)
3 Apr. Primary Rundown Note (Study Series 6) 75
4 Apr. Tech Div Primary Rundown (revised-see 135) 76
4 Apr. Ethics (EstO Series 14) (HCO PL) 78
7 Apr.R Touch Assists-Correct Ones (BTB)(revised & reissued
23 June 1974) Vol.. IX-502
9 Apr. Correct Danger Condition Handling (HCO PL) 82
10 Apr. PreOTs Don't C/S (C/S Series 75, Solo C/S Series 13)
85
15 Apr. Expanded Dianetics Series 1R 87
16 Apr. PTS RD Correction List 89
17 Apr. C/Sing a PTS Rundown (C/S Series 76) 91
19 Apr. "Quickie" Defined (C/S Series 77) 93
20 Apr. Suppressed Pcs and PTS Tech (Exp. Dn. Series 4) 95
20 Apr. Product Purpose and Why and WC Error Correction (C/S
Series 78) 96
24 Apr. PTS Interviews (C/S Series 79, Exp. Dn. Series 5) 98
26 Apr. The Glib Student (Study Series 8) 99
3 May Ethics and Executives (Exec. Series 12) (HCO PL) 100
3 May Havingness 105
4 May Six Basic Processes 107
4 May Assists-A Flag Expertise Subject (correction of
23 July 1971) Vol.. VII-335
5 May R The Remedy of Havingness (revised 17 Jan. 1973)
112
6 May Remedy of Havingness-The Process 115
7 May Expanded Gita 120
8 May The Importance of Havingness 123
8 May Old Lists Are Not To Be Copied (reissue of
19 Sept. 1968) Vol. VI-256
8 May Lists (reissue of 30 Sept. 1968) Vol. VI-263
10 May Robotism 127
11 May Standard C/S for Word Clearing in Session-Method 1
(W/C Series 8RB) (revision of 30 June 1971) 131
12 May Training and CCH Processes (reissue of 11 June 1957)
Vol. III- 61
30 May The Primary Correction Rundown Revised (Study Series 5R)
(revision of 30 Mar. 1972) 133
30 May Primary Rundown (Revised) (revision of 4 Apr. 1972)
135
30 May Super-literacy (LRH ED 178 Int) see-314
2 June L4BR-For Assessment of All Listing Errors (revision of
15 Dec. 1968) 138
3 June R PTS Rundown, Final Step (revised 15 Oct. 1974)
141
9 June Grammar (W/C Series 36) 143
10 June Bypassed Charge (reissued 21 Sept. 1974) 144
12 June Length of Time to Evaluate (Data Series 26, EstO Series
18)
(HCO PL) 145
15 June "Dog Pcs" (C/S Series 80) 147
1972 (cont.)
16 June R Auditor's Rights Modified (C/S Series 81R) (revised
27 Feb. 1975) 149
19 June Dinky Dictionaries (W/C Series 37) 151
21 June Method 5 (W/C Series 38) 152
21 June Method 6 (W/C Series 39) 153
21 June Method 7 (W/C Series 40) 154
21 June Method 8 (W/C Series 41) 155
25 June Recovering Students and Pcs (HCO PL) see-193
20 July Primary Correction Rundown Handling 157
20 July Distractive and Additive Questions and Orders 160
10 Aug. Dianetic HCO B-Interest (C/S Series 82, Exp. Dn. Series 6)
(amended & reissued 28 Mar. 1974) 161
13 Aug.R Fast Flow Training (corrected & reissued 15 Aug.
1972) 162
15 Aug. Fast Flow Training (corrected reissue of 13 Aug. 1972)
162
16 Aug. Flubless C/Sing (C/S Series 84) 164
17 Aug. Method 4 Notes (W/C Series 42) (revised-see 305) 166
18 Aug. Grammar Definition (W/C Series 43) 167
3 Sept. Honest TRs (LRH ED 180 Int) see- 33
13 Sept. Catastrophes From and Repair of "No Interest" Items
(C/S Series 85,
Exp. Dn. Series 7) (amended & reissued 28 Mar. 1974)
169
5 Oct. Continuous PT Overts (reissue of 25 Sept. 1968) Vol. VI-
260
2 Nov. How To Get Results In an HGC (C/S Series 56, Aud. Admin
Series 2) (reissue of 25 Aug. 1971) Vol.
VII-365
6 Nov. Illiteracy and Work (W/C Series 44) 170
6 Nov. Auditor's Worksheets (C/S Series 66, Aud. Admin Series 15)
(reissue of 3 Nov. 1971 ) Vol. VII-433
12 Nov. Johannesburg Security Check-Revised (HCO PL)
(revision of
7 Apr. 1961 ) see footnote-422
15 Nov. Students Who Succeed 172
13 Dec.R Integrity Processing Questions Must Be F/Ned (I/P
Series 10R)
(revised & reissued 1 Nov. 1974) 175
14 Dec.R Generalities Won't Do (I/P Series 11R) (reissued 1
Nov. 1974) 176
15 Dec.R Withholds, Missed and Partial (I/P Series 12R)
(revised
1 Nov. 1974) 178
16 Dec. Help the Pc (I/P Series 13) (reissued 7 Nov. 1974) 180
17 Dec. Havingness (I/P Series 14) (reissued 7 Nov. 1974) 181
30 Dec. Confronting (Study Series 2) (corrected reissue of
2 June 1971) Vol. VII-264
1973
4 Jan. Confront (Study Series 9) (reissued 6 Apr. 1974) 182
17 Jan. The Remedy of Havingness (revision of 5 May 1972) 112
28 Jan. Keeping Scientology Working (HCO PL) (reissue of
7 Feb. 1965) Vol. VI- 4
6 Mar. False TA Addition (revision of 12 Nov. 1971) Vol. VII-438
1973 (cont.)
6 Mar. VIII Actions (C/S Series 13R) (revision of
30 June 1970) Vol. VII-100
30 Mar. Step Four-Handling Originations (reissued 21 Sept. 1974)
183
5 Apr. Axiom 28 Amended (reissued 19 Sept. 1974) 185
7 Apr.R Gradients in TRs (revised 15 Nov. 1974) 186
15 May Code of a Scientologist (HCO PL) (revision of
5 Feb. 1969) OEC Vol. 0- 25
10 JuneRA Cramming (Cramming Series 10RA) (reissued 19 Sept. 1974)
188
26 June Student Rescue Intensive (revision of 23 Nov. 1969)
Vol. VI-451
11 July Assist Summary 189
21 July Recovering Students and Pcs (Qual Flub Catch Series 4)
193
25 July F/N Everything (corrected reissue of 14 Mar. 1971) Vol.
VII-196
29 July Art, More About (Art Series 2) 196
30 July Scientology, Current State of the Subject and Materials
201
2 Aug. Pep 207
10 Aug. PTS Handling 209
Sept. Mission Into Time 212
15 Oct. Nulling and F/Ning Prepared Lists (C/S Series 87) 213
21 Oct. Pc Completions-Second Revision (revision of 30 Aug. 1971)
see-214
23 Oct. Pc Completions-Second Revision (revision of 30 Aug. 1971 )
see-214
11 Nov. Preclear Declare? Procedure 218
15 Nov.R Fear of People List-R (revised 4 Dec. 1973) 219
20 Nov. Reissued from 21st Advanced Clinical Course Training
Drills
-Anti-Q and A TR 221
20 Nov. F/N What You Ask or Program (C/S Series 89) 222
21 Nov. The Cure of Q and A-Man's Deadliest Disease 223
23 Nov. Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA (revised-see 415) 226
23 Nov. False TA Checklist (revision of 29 Feb. 1972)
(revised-see 417) 34
24 Nov. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53 RF) (reissued
25 Nov. 1973) (canceled-see 398) 228
25 Nov. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53 RF)
(reissue of
24 Nov. 1973) (canceled-see 398) 228
4 Dec. Fear of People List-R (revision of 15 Nov. 1973) 219
5 Dec. The Reason for Q and A 230
6 Dec. The Primary Failure (C/S Series 90) 233
15 Dec. The Continuous Missed W/H and Continuous Overt with
Data on
Degraded Beings and False PTS Conditions 235
1974
6 Jan. Assist Summary Addition 237
23 Jan. The Technical Breakthrough of 1973 ! The Introspection RD
(revised-see 346) 239
1974 (cont.)
27 Jan. Dianetics-R3R Commands Have Background Data 243
28 Jan. L3RC-Dianetics and Ext RD Repair List (revision of
11 Apr. 1971) (revised-see 265) 245
6 Feb. Pc Completions-Second Revision (revision of 30 Aug. 1971)
214
10 Feb. The Technical Breakthrough of 1973! The Introspection RD
(revision of 23 Jan. 1974) (revised-see 346) 249
15 Feb. Service Facsimile Theory and Expanded Dianetics (Exp. Dn.
Series 20)
(amended & reissued 28 Mar. 1974) 257
17 Feb. Mutual Out Ruds (C/S Series 91) 259
20 Feb. Introspection RD-Additional Actions 260
5 Mar. Overt-Motivator Sequence (corrected reissue of
20 May 1968) Vol. VI-231
6 Mar. Introspection RD-Second Addition-Information to C/Ses-
Fixated Attention 262
8 Mar. L3RD-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List (revision of 11 Apr.
1971) 265
Mar. Organization Executive Course and Management Series
269
17 Mar. L3 EXD RB-Expanded Dianetics Repair List (Exp. Dn. Series
3RB)
(revision of 2 Apr. 1972) 70
17 Mar. TWC Checksheets-TWC, Using Wrong Questions 270
18 Mar. E-Meters-Sensitivity Errors 271
21 Mar. End Phenomena 272
24 Mar. Use of Dianetics (C/S Series 32RA) (revision of 4 Apr.
1971) 274
28 Mar. Dianetic HCO B-Interest (C/S Series 82, Exp. Dn. Series 6)
(amended reissue of 10 Aug. 1972) 161
28 Mar. Catastrophes From and Repair of "No Interest" Items
(C/S Series 85, Exp. Dn. Series 7) (amended reissue of
13 Sept. 1972) 169
28 Mar. Service Facsimile Theory and Expanded Dianetics
(Exp. Dn. Series 20) (amended reissue of 15 Feb. 1974)
257
28 Mar. Expanded Dianetics Developments Since the Original
Lectures
(Exp. Dn. Series 21 ) 276
28 Mar. Security of Data (HCO PL) (amended reissue of
11 Aug. 1971) Vol. VI-105
30 Mar. Interiorization Summary (C/S Series 23RA) (revision of
17 Dec. 1971) 279
4 Apr. Tone Scale in Full (revision of 25 Sept. 1971) Vol.
VII-404
4 Apr. Scales (correction of 18 Sept. 1967) Vol. VI-200
4 Apr. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53RG)
(reissue of
24 Nov. 1973) (canceled-see 398) 282
6 Apr. Use of Dianetics (C/S Series 28RA) (revision of 7 Mar.
1971) 284
6 Apr. Confront (Study Series 9) (reissue of 4 Jan. 1973) 182
8 Apr. Triple Reruns (C/S Series 33 RA) (revision of 5 Apr. 1971
) 286
8 Apr. Dianetics (C/S Series 36RB) (revision of 21 Apr. 1971)
289
10 Apr. Stage Manners (Art Series 3) 293
19 Apr. CCHs 5, 6 & 7 (amended reissue of 30 Sept. 1971) Vol.
VII-408
1974 (cont.)
20 Apr. Introspection RD-Third Addition-Additional
Introspection RD Steps 295
23 Apr. Expanded Dianetics Requisites (Exp. Dn. Series 22)
(revised-see 372) 297
25 Apr. Rhythm (Art Series 4) 298
8 May Thirty-Six New Presessions (revision of 6 Oct. 1960)
Vol. IV-156
10 May Objectives-An Early Release (revision of 2 Nov. 1957)
see-393
14 May Int Rundown Correction List-Revised (revision of
29 Oct. 1971 ) Vol. VII-429
31 May Unhandled Drugs and Ethics 300
6 June Quads Canceled (C/S Series 28R, 32R, 33R, 36R, 49R)
(revision of 15 July 1971 ) (canceled-see 3 73) Vol.
VII-324
8 June Assists (C/S Series 49R) (revised reissue of 5 July 1971)
Vol. VII-322
8 July Word Clearing Method 4 (W/C Series 32RA) (revision of
22 Feb. 1972) 301
8 July R Clear to F/N (W/C Series 53R) (revised 24 July 1974)
303
8 July R Word Clearing Errors (C/S Series 92R) (revised 24
July 1974) 304
8 July Method 4 Notes (W/C Series 42R, T/C Series 10)
(revision of 17 Aug. 1972) 305
17 July XDN Case B (Exp. Dn. Series 23) 307
24 July Clear to F/N (W/C Series 53R) (revision of 8 July 1974)
303
24 July Word Clearing Errors (C/S Series 92R) (revision of 8 July
1974) 304
30 Aug. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53 RH)
(revised reissue of 24 Nov. 1973) (canceled-see 398)
308
31 Aug. New Grade Chart (C/S Series 93) 311
7 Sept. Superliteracy and the Cleared Word (W/C Series 54)
314
17 Sept. Green Form (HCO PL) (revision of 7 Apr. 1970)
see-321
19 Sept. Exteriorization (reissue of 22 Oct. 1971) Vol.
VII-420
19 Sept. Change Brackets and Commands (reissue of
30 Apr. 1961) Vol. IV-258
19 Sept. Obnosis and the Tone Scale (reissue of 26 Oct. 1970)
Vol. VII-148
19 Sept. Interiorization Errors (C/S Series 35RA) (revision
of
16 Dec. 1971) Vol. VII-456
19 Sept. Cramming (Cramming Series 10RA) (reissue of 10 June
1973) 188
19 Sept. Axiom 28 Amended (reissue of 5 Apr. 1973) 185
21 Sept. Assists in Scientology (reissue of 21 Oct. 1971)
Vol. VII-415
21 Sept. Resistive Cases-Former Therapy (reissue of
25 Nov. 1971) Vol. VII-449
21 Sept. End Phenomenas (reissue of 5 Dec. 1971) Vol.
VII-451
21 Sept. Bypassed Charge (reissue of 10 June 1972) 144
21 Sept. Step 4-Handling Originations (reissue of 30 Mar.
1973) 183
21 Sept. Tapes, How to Use (W/C Series 25R, T/C Series 6R)
(revision of 10 Nov. 1971) Vol. VII-434
21 Sept. Dianetics (C/S Series 36RB) (reissue of 21 Apr.
1971) 289
1974 (cont.)
25 Sept. Reduction of Refunds-C/Ses and Overload (C/S Series
94) 318
26 Sept. Handling Flubbed Pcs 320
29 Sept. Green Form (HCO PL) (revision of 7 Apr. 1970)
321
6 Oct. The Vital Information Rundown-The Technical
Breakthrough
of 1974 327
9 Oct. HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists RA (revision of
28 Aug. 1970) Vol. VII-132
15 Oct. PTS Rundown, Final Step (revision of 3 June 1972) 141
15 Oct. PTS Rundown (revision of 9 Dec. 1971 ) (revised-see 338)
330
15 Oct. Cramming Over Out Ruds (Cramming Series 14) 334
19 Oct. The Dramatization of Withholds on Vital Information
Lines (HCO PL) 336
21 Oct. F/N and Erasure (revision of 1 Aug. 1970) Vol. VII-117
21 Oct. Summary of How to Write an Auditor's Report and
Worksheets
for HQS Co-Audit (revision of 5 Apr. 1971 ) Vol. VII-215
21 Oct. PTS Rundown (revision of 9 Dec. 1971 ) 338
23 Oct. Course Translation to Tape (T/C Series I ) (reissue of
20 Nov. 1971) Vol. VII-441
23 Oct. Teaching a Tape Course (T/C Series 3R) (revision of
21 Nov. 1971) Vol. VII-446
24 Oct. Method 4 Notes (W/C Series 42R, T/C Series 10) (reissue of
17 Aug. 1972) 305
1 Nov. Integrity Processing Questions Must Be F/Ned (I/P
Series 10R)
(revised reissue of 13 Dec. 19 72) 175
1 Nov. Generalities Won't Do (I/P Series 11 R) (reissue of 14
Dec. 1972) 176
1 Nov. Withholds, Missed and Partial (I/P Series 1 2R)
(revision of 15 Dec. 1972) 178
1 Nov. Rock Slams and Rock Slammers 344
1 Nov. The Technical Breakthrough of 1973! The Introspection RD
(revision of 23 Jan. 1974) 346
5 Nov. Drugs, More About 354
7 Nov. Help the Pc (I/P Series 13) (reissue of 16 Dec. 1972)
180
7 Nov. Havingness (I/P Series 14) (reissue of 17 Dec. 1972)
181
12 Nov. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53RI) (revised
reissue of 24 Nov. 1973) (canceled-see 398) 356
15 Nov. Student Rehabilitation List 359
15 Nov. Gradients and TRs (revision of 7 Apr. 1973) 186
20 Nov. L IX Hi-Lo TA List Revised (revised reissue of 1 Jan.
1972) 1
25 Nov. Barriers to Study (W/C Series 3 R) (revision of
25 June 1971) Vol. VII-293
26 Nov. Post Purpose Clearing (revision of 4 Aug. 1971 ) 363
29 Nov. The Communication Cycle in Auditing (B/A Series 5R)
(revision of 23 May 1971) Vol. VII-248
30 Nov. Supervisor Two-Way Comm and the Misunderstood Word
(W/C Series 4R) (revision of 26 June 1971) Vol. VII-299
1 Dec. Word Clearing Lists for Prepared Lists 366
1974 (cont.)
1 Dec. Expanded GF 40 RB (revision of 30 June 1971 ) Vol.
VII-304
1 Dec. The Three Important Communication Lines (B/A Series 3)
(revision of 23 May 1971) Vol. VII-243
2 Dec. Supervisor Two-Way Comm Explained (W/C Series 5 R)
(revision of 27 June 1971) Vol. VII-302
3 Dec. Course Supervisor Correction List-Study Corr List 2R
(revision of 27 Mar. 1972) 52
4 Dec. Communication Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle (B/A
Series 4R)
(revision of 23 May 1971) Vol. VII-244
4 Dec. Recognition of Rightness of the Being (B/A Series 10R)
(revision of 23 May 1971 ) Vol. VII-257
4 Dec. The Magic of the Communication Cycle (B/A Series 1 R)
(revision of 23 May 1971) Vol. VII-238
5 Dec. Overts-Order of Effectiveness in Processing (I/P Series
6R) see-370
6 Dec. The Two Parts of Auditing (B/A Series 2R) (revision of
23 May 1971) Vol. VII-240
8 Dec. TR 0-Notes on Blinking 369
9 Dec. Effectiveness of Overts in Processing (I/P Series 6RA)
370
14 Dec. Expanded Dianetic Requisites (Exp. Dn. Series 22R)
(revision of 23 Apr. 1974) 372
17 Dec. Auditor Correction List-Auditor Recovery (Study Corr
List 3RA)
(revised reissue of 27 Mar. 1972) 60
1975
12 Jan. Quads Reinstated 373
13 Jan. Use of Quadruple Dianetics (C/S Series 28RA-1) (reissue of
7 Mar. 1971 ) 374
13 Jan. Use of Quad Dianetics (C/S Series 32RA-1R) (addition to
4 Apr. 1971, revised 22 Feb. 1975) 377
13 Jan. Triple and Quad Reruns (C/S Series 33RA-1) (reissue of
5 Apr. 1971) 380
13 Jan. Quadruple Dianetics-Dangers of (C/S Series 36RB-1R)
(addition to 21 Apr. 1971, revised 22 Feb. 1975) 383
16 Jan. Past Life Remedies 388
Jan. Hymn of Asia 390
23 Jan. The Purpose of Class VIII 391
29 Jan. What is a Course? (HCO PL) (revision of 16 Mar. 1971)
Vol. VII-198
31 Jan. Six Zones of Action (revision of 17 Sept. 1968) Vol. VI-
252
31 Jan. Teaching the Class VIII (revision of 22 Oct. 1968) Vol. VI-
276
31 Jan. Case Supervisor-Class VIII-The Basic Processes (revision
of
2 Nov. 1968) Vol. VI-278
14 Feb. L10 Prerequisites 392
22 Feb. An Objective Rundown (revision of 2 Nov. 1957) 393
22 Feb. Use of Quad Dianetics (C/S Series 32RA-1R) (revision of
4Apr.1971-1) 377
1975 (cont.)
22 Feb. Quadruple Dianetics-Dangers of (C/S Series 36RB-1R)
(revision of 21 Apr. 1971-1 ) 383
24 Feb. Mutter TR (revision of 1 Oct. 1965) 395
27 Feb. Auditor's Rights Modified (C/S Series 81R) (revision of
16 June 1972) 149
28 Feb. Green Form, S & D (addition to 10 Sept. 1968) Vol. VI-
250
Mar. Dianetics Today 396
7 Mar. Ext and Ending Session 397
18 Mar. Meter Use in Qual (Cramming Series 15) 397
22 Mar. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53 RJ)
(revised reissue of 24 Nov. 1973) 398
25 Mar. Diet, Theory of a Natural Diet 401
29 Mar. Anti-biotics, Administering of 403
19 Apr. Out Basics and How to Get Them In 409
23 Apr. Vanishing Cream and False TA 414
23 Apr. Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA (revision of 23 Nov. 1973)
415
23 Apr. False TA Checklist (revision of 29 Feb. 1972) 417
30 May Johannesburg Confessional List-Revised (HCO PL) (revision
of 7 Apr. 1961) 419
10 June Drug Data (corrected reissue of 29 Aug. 1968) Vol. VI-
244
June Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary 423
23 Oct. Technical Queries 424
26 Oct. "Failed" Cases (C/S Series 95) 426
26 Oct. PC Application Form for Any Major Auditing Action
(HCO PL)
(revision of 4 Feb. 1970) Vol. VII-16
1976
1 Jan. The Auditor's Code (HCO PL) (revision of 14 Oct. 1968)
Vol. VI-269
27 July PTS Rundown and Vital Info RD Position Corrected 428
29 July PTS Rundown (revision of 9 Dec. 1971RA) 429
29 July The Vital Information Rundown-The Technical
Breakthrough
of 1974 (revision of 6 Oct. 1974) 436
10 Aug. R/Ses, What They Mean 440
24 Oct. Delivery Repair Lists (C/S Series 96) 445
26 Oct. Auditing Reports, Falsifying of (C/S Series 97) 450
28 Oct. Auditing Folders, Omissions In Completeness
(C/S Series 98) 452
Subject Index 454
Alphabetical List of Titles 482
LONG CONTENTS
HCO B 1 Jan. 1972RA L IX HI-LO TA LIST REVISED, 1
Hi-Lo TA Assessment,
Word Clearing Series 30
HCO B 2 Jan. 1972 WCl COMES FIRST, 10
Don't do Word Clearing Method 2 before Method 1, 10
Word Clearing Method 2 EP, 10
C/S Series 69 Addition
HCO B 3 Jan. 1972 C/SING CHECKLIST, 11
Go back in the folder to where the case was running well and come
forward, 11
HCO B 7 Jan. 1972 TRAINING AND INTERNING STAFF AUDITORS, 12
Recruiting staff auditors, 12
Interne Supervisor, 12
Staff auditor trainee programming, 12
Interne Supervisor has authority over auditor trainee, 13
Sending auditors to upper orgs for training, 13
SH or AO program of auditor classification and interneships, 13
Interne Supervisor admin, 14
Paid students, 15
Part-time study on next level while auditing is a failure, 15
HCO B 14 Jan. 1972 STUDY CORRECTION LIST, 16 [CANCELED]
HCO B 20 Jan. 1972 PTS RD ADDITION, 19
The only reasons a PTS RD does not work, 19
Remedies for PTS Rundown errors, 19
HCO B 3 Feb. 1972 R6EW-OT III NO INTERFERENCE AREA, 20
Why there is a No Interference Area between R6EW and OT III, 20
Solo auditing set-up, 20
Drug Rundown is a must before Solo, 21
Grade Chart steps before Solo, 21
OCA/APA test, 22
Ideal Solo program, 22
Explanation of sequence of OT III, OT VII, OT IIIX, 23
Availability of auditing materials, 23
HCO B 15 Feb. 1972 FALSE TA ADDITION 2, 24
Wrong ways to get a pc to read between 2.0 and 3.0 on an E-Meter, 24
Commonest sources of low and high TA, 24
C/S Series 74
HCO B 16 Feb. 1972 TALKING THE TA DOWN MODIFIED, 25
Right way to handle high TA, 25
There is no need to talk a TA down; it is faster to directly locate
the reason it is up, 25
HCO B 18 Feb. 1972 FALSE TA ADDITION 3, 26
The honesty of the auditor determines his results, 26
Low TAs, 26
Word Clearing Series 32R
HCO B 22 Feb. 1972 WORD CLEARING METHOD 4, 28 [REVISED]
Use of Word Clearing Method 4, 28
Word Clearing Method 4 procedure, 28
Supervisor's use of Word Clearing Method 4, 29
C/S Series 71A
HCO B 24 Feb. 1972 WORD CLEARING OCAs, 30
Why question sheets for tests must not be word cleared, 30
Testing musts, 30 Examiner attest check, 30
Test line is a check on C/S and auditing quality, 31
Word Clearing Series 15R
HCO B 26 Feb. 1972 WORD CLEARING SERIES 15R, 32
Word clearing any words on any test at any time is a High Crime, 32
Foreign language persons, 32
Mis Us on tests, 32
26 Feb. 1972 LRH MODEL TAPE SESSIONS, 33
Honest TRs, 33
Result of poor TRs, 33
Use of LRH Model Auditing Tapes, 33
HCO B 29 Feb. 1972R FALSE TA CHECKLIST, 34 [REVISED]
Establishment Officer Series 5
HCO PL 13 Mar. 1972 PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT-ORDERS AND PRODUCTS, 37
People not knowing their products require constant orders, 37
Hat survey for orders, 37
Disestablishment, 38
Hatting for product, 38
Right direction to hat, 38
Steps to clear "product", 39
"Quickie" Product Clearing, 39
Disagreements Check, 40
Product Officers, 40
HCO PL 16 Mar. 1972 WHAT IS A COURSE-HIGH CRIME, 41
Cause of Supervisor failure, 41
Course Super's primary tech, 42
Reason for student queries, 42
Product of Supervisor, 43
Establishment Officer Series 11
HCO PL 23 Mar. 1972 FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM, 44
TA and Product Clearing, 49
HCO B 20 Nov. 1971 HAS SPECIALIST AND ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER AUDITING
PROGRAM (Revised), 50
HAS Rundown, 50
HCO B 27 Mar. 1972R COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST
-STUDY CORR LIST 2R, 52
Course Supervisor Correction Form-additional actions required, 59
HCO B 27 Mar. 1972RA AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST-AUDITOR RECOVERY
-STUDY CORR LIST 3RA, 60
Study Series 5
HCO B 30 Mar. 1972 PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN-FIRST
CRAMMING CORRECTION, 65 [REVISED]
Cramming a person is a waste of time if he never learned to study, 65
Primary Correction Rundown, 65
Auditing interlude, 65
Study tech section, 66
Cramming actions, 66
Expanded Dianetics Series 1
HCO B 31 Mar. 1972 EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 1, 68 [REVISED]
Expanded Dianetics vs. Standard Dianetics, 68
Expanded Dianetics is very specifically adjusted to the pc, 68
Expanded Dianetics training, 68
Hubbard Graduate Dianetic Specialist, 69
Charges for Expanded Dianetics, 69
Auditor prerequisite for Expanded Dianetics, 69
Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB
HCO B 2 Apr. 1972RB L3 EXD RB-EXPANDED DIANETICS REPAIR LIST, 70
Study Series 6
HCO B 3 Apr. 1972 PRIMARY RUNDOWN NOTE, 75
Primary Rundown handling of Study Tapes, 75
HCO B 4 Apr. 1972 TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN, 76 [REVISED]
Primary Rundown actions in HGC are case handling and Word Clearing
Method 1, 76
Primary Rundown in Dept of Training, 76
Study Tapes and Student Hat, 76
Primary Rundown product, 77
Establishment Officer Series 14
HCO PL 4 Apr. 1972 ETHICS, 78
Exchange flows and out-ethics, 78
Criminality, 78
Ethics Tech Admin sequence, 78
Exchange and criminality, 79
Production, morale and exchange factor, 80
Exchange by Dynamics, 80
Conditions by Dynamics, 81
HCO PL 9 Apr. 1972 CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING, 82
Danger Formula, 82
First Dynamic Danger Formula, 82
Junior Danger Formula, 82
Trouble Area Assessment, 83
Trouble Area Short Form, 84
Ending a Danger Condition, 84
C/S Series 75,
Solo C/S Series 13
HCO B 10 Apr. 1972 PRE-OTS DON'T C/S, 85
Solo C/Sing line, 85
Solo auditing admin, 85
Worst features of a Pre-OT doing his own C/Sing, 86
Pre-OTs do not C/S their own folders, 86
Expanded Dianetics Series 1R
HCO B 15 Apr. 1972 EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 1R, 87
Expanded Dianetics vs. Standard Dianetics, 87
Expanded Dianetics is very specifically adjusted to the pc, 87
Expanded Dianetics training, 87
Hubbard Graduate Dianetic Specialist, 88
Charges for Expanded Dianetics, 88
Auditor prerequisite for Expanded Dianetics, 88
HCO B 16 Apr. 1972 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST, 89
C/S Series 76
HCO B 17 Apr. 1972 C/SING A PTS RUNDOWN, 91
The whole point of a PTS Rundown is to make a person not PTS any
longer, 91
PTS results in illness and roller-coaster and is the cause of illness
and roller-coaster, 91
Steps of handling PTS pc, 91
PTS data, 92
PTS situations, 92
End phenomenon of the PTS RD is attained when the person is well and
stable, 92
C/S Series 77
HCO B 19 Apr. 1972 "QUICKIE" DEFINED, 93
Definitions of "quickie", 93
Examples of quickie actions, 93
Complete is the reverse of quickie, 93
Necessity of clearing words in commands, 94
Remedies for the quickie impulse, 94
Expanded Dianetics Series 4
HCO B 20 Apr. 1972 SUPPRESSED PCS AND PTS TECH, 95
Characteristics of PTS persons, 95
Administrative tech of PTS Rundown, 95
C/S Series 78
HCO B 20 Apr. 1972 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR
CORRECTION, 96
C/S must be sure all Why finding and Word Clearing papers and
worksheets get into pc's folders, 96
Listing out of session, 96
Self-auditing, 96
List error reaction, 97
Symptoms of out lists, 97
Alternate wordings for "PTS", 97
Wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where untrained people
are also using meters, 97
C/S Series 79, Expanded Dianetics Series 5
HCO B 24 Apr. 1972 PTS INTERVIEWS, 98
PTS Interview questions, 98
Required actions of PTS Interview, 98
Study Series 8
HCO B 26 Apr. 1972 THE GLIB STUDENT, 99
Glib student can confront the words and ideas; he cannot confront the
physical universe or people around him and so cannot apply, 99
Handling the glib student, 99
Executive Series 12
HCO PL 3 May 1972 ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES, 100
Danger Rundown, 3 May PL, 100
Definition of executive, 100
Responsibility of executives to handle out-ethics, 100
Ethics and organization, 100
Examples of ethics offenses, 101
Technical aspect of out-ethics, 101
Danger Rundown steps, 102
Step 1: Inform the person personally he is in Danger Condition, 102
Step 2: Ethics is gotten in by definition on the person, 102
Step 3: Ask the person what out-ethics situation he or she is involved
in, 103
Step 4: Have the person work out how the out-ethics situation is a
betrayal of the group, 103
Step 5: First Dynamic Danger Formula, 103
Step 6: Review the person and his stats and appearance and personal
life, 104
HCO B 3 May 1972 HAVINGNESS, 105
Thetan's relation to energy, 105
Dwindling spiral of the mest universe, 105
Remedy of havingness, 105
HCO B 4 May 1972 SIX BASIC PROCESSES, 107
Two-way Communication, 107
Elementary Straightwire, 107
Opening Procedure of 8-C, 107
Opening Procedure by Duplication, 108
Remedy of Havingness, 108
Spotting Spots, 108
Training required on the six basic processes, 108
Precision definition of communication lag, 108
"Value" of energy, 109
Duplication, 109
Opening Procedure by Duplication, 109
Auditor's willingness to duplicate, 109
Training and duplication, 110
Goal of auditor and pc, 110
HCO B 5 May 1972R THE REMEDY OF HAVINGNESS, 112
Thetan cuts down knowingness to create a game, 112
Know to Mystery Scale described, 112
Game conditions, 113
HCO B 6 May 1972 REMEDY OF HAVINGNESS-THE PROCESS, 115
Definition of Remedy of Havingness, 115
Expanded GITA related to Remedy of Havingness, 115
How to run Remedy of Havingness, 116
Reason for dropped havingness, 117
End of Cycle Processing, 118
HCO B 7 May 1972 EXPANDED GITA, 120
Theory of Expanded GITA, 120
Item list for Expanded GITA, 120
Present Time Differentiation; Exteriorization by Scenery, 121
ARC Straight Wire using next-to-last list of Self Analysis in
Scientology, 121
Run psychotic cases on Present Time Differentiation, 121
HCO B 8 May 1972 THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVINGNESS, 123
Indicators of dropped havingness, 123
Repair of Havingness vs. Remedy of Havingness, 124
Sacrifices and genetic entity, 125
Chronic somatics, 126
HCO B 10 May 1972 ROBOTISM, 127
Primary human failing is an inability to function as himself or
contribute to group achievements, 127
Robot band of determinism scale, 127
Mechanism of needing orders, 127
Perception related to overts and withholds, 128
Overt products, 128
Slowness, 128
Group justice, 128
No real malice in the robot, 128
False reports, 129
Robot goes into morale declines easily, 129
Physical inertia, 129 PTS and robots, 129
Basic Why for needing orders, being inactive, incompetent and
unproductive, 130
Remedy of robot condition, 130
End product of robotism handling, 130
Word Clearing Series 8RB
HCO B 30 June 1971 R STANDARD C/S FOR WORD CLEARING IN SESSION -METHOD 1,
131
Word Clearing Method 1 procedure, 132
Word Clearing Method 1 end phenomena, 132
Study Series 5R
HCO B 30 Mar. 1972R THE PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN REVISED, 133
When the Primary Correction Rundown is given, 133
Primary Correction Rundown checklist, 134
HCO B 4 Apr. 1972 PRIMARY RUNDOWN (REVISED), 135
Primary Rundown consists of word clearing and study tech; it makes a
student super-literate, 135
Keynote of Primary Rundown is honesty, 135
Primary Rundown steps, 136
No Interference Zone, 137
Primary Correction Rundown takes care of people who have trouble on
the PRD, 137
Students who are or have been on drugs need a Drug Rundown before
tackling Word Clearing Method 1, 137
HCO B 15 Dec. 1968R L4BR-FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING
ERRORS, 138
HCO B 3 June 1972R PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP, 141
Can't Have Rundown, 141
SPs are SPs because they deny Hav and enforce unwanted Hav, 141
PTS RD two-way comm question converted to Listing and Nulling, 142
Word Clearing Series 36
HCO B 9 June 1972 GRAMMAR, 143
Grammatical words and small words should be looked up in a simple
grammar textbook, 143
Grammar textbooks, 143
Grammar Course before Word Clearing, 143
HCO B 10 June 1972 BYPASSED CHARGE, 144
Mechanism of BPC (By-Passed-Charge), 144
Data Series 26,
Establishment Officer Series 18
HCO PL 12 June 1972 LENGTH OF TIME TO EVALUATE, 145
Assessment for individual Why of evaluator taking a long time to
evaluate, 145
C/S Series 80
HCO B 15 June 1972 "DOG PCs", 147
Remedy for an auditor with "dog pcs", 147
Remedy for a C/S who is agreeing there are "dog pcs", 147
Errors behind "dog pcs", 148
C/S Series 81R
HCO B 16 June 1972R AUDITOR'S RIGHTS MODIFIED, 149
Major Why of falling hours, incomplete programs and other confusions,
149
Auditor's right to choose pcs modified, 149 "Dog pcs" are problems in
repair, 149
Stats of C/Ses and auditors, D of P and Dir of Tech Services, 150
The road to truth is begun with honesty, 150
Word Clearing Series 37
HCO B 19 June 1972 DINKY DICTIONARIES, 151
Small dictionaries are very often a greater liability than they are a
help, 151
Which are the best dictionaries, 151
Word Clearing Series 38
HCO B 21 June 1972 METHOD 5, 152
Word Clearing Method 5 is called Material Clearing, 152
Word Clearing Method 5 procedure, 152
Word Clearing Series 39
HCO B 21 June 1972 METHOD 6, 153
Word Clearing Method 6 is called Key Word Clearing, 153
Word Clearing Method 6 procedure, 153
Post trouble remedied by Word Clearing Method 6, 153
Word Clearing Series 40
HCO B 21 June 1972 METHOD 7, 154
Word Clearing Method 7 is reading aloud, 154
Word Clearing Method 7 procedure, 154
Word Clearing Series 41
HCO B 21 June 1972 METHOD 8, 155
Word Clearing Method 8 is an action used in the Primary Rundown, 155
Word Clearing Method 8 procedure, 155
HCO B 20 July 1972 PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN HANDLING, 157
Who PCRDs are given to, 157
The purpose of the PCRD is to get the person through the PRD, 157
Folder study, 157 Outlists, 157
Idle student, 158
Resistive students, 158
Pre-PCRD steps, 158
End phenomena of a Primary Correction Rundown, 159
HCO B 20 July 1972
DISTRACTIVE AND ADDITIVE QUESTIONS AND ORDERS, 160
Auditor distracting pc, 160
Auditor evaluation, 160
All auditors talk too much, 160
Muzzled auditing means stating only the Model Session patter and
commands and TRs, 160
C/S Series 82,
Expanded Dianetics Series 6
HCO B 10 Aug. 1972 DIANETIC HCO B-INTEREST, 161
On Drugs and Evil Purposes or Intentions one does not ask the pc if he
is interested in running the item, 161
Dianetic "no interest" items, 161
HCO B 13 Aug. 1972R FAST FLOW TRAINING, 162
Fast flow student, 162
Fast flow student passes courses by attestation, 162
Provisional certificate, 162
Provisional certificates expire after one year if not validated, 162
Fast flow prerequisites, 163
Non-PRDs, 163
Drug cases get Drug RD before Word Clearing Method 1 , 163
Fast flow student designation, 163
C/S Series 84
HCO B 16 Aug. 1972 FLUBLESS C/SING, 164
C/S makes sure tech courses are taught well, 164
C/S makes sure Qual has a Cramming Officer, 164
C/S standard handling of auditors, 164
Cramming, retread and retrain, 164
A falsified auditing report puts the auditor at once at retrain, 164
OT TR 0 and TR 0 are the keys to good auditing, 164
Electronic attest, 165
Word Clearing Series 42
HCO B 17 Aug. 1972 METHOD 4 NOTES, 166 [REVISED]
Break down the materials when doing Word Clearing Method 4, 166
Word Clearing Method 4 of tapes and books, 166
Errors in Word Clearing Method 4, 166
Word Clearing Series 43
HCO B 18 Aug. 1972 GRAMMAR DEFINITION, 167
Grammar is a systematic description of the ways in which words are
used in a particular language, 167
Word classes, 167
Rules of grammar, 167
Types of grammars, 168
C/S Series 85,
Expanded Dianetics Series 7
HCO B 13 Sept. 1972 CATASTROPHES FROM AND REPAIR OF "NO INTEREST" ITEMS,
169
Drug Rundown can fail by asking for interest on items, 169
Don't ask for interest on intentions, evil purposes and drug items,
169 Repair of "no interest" items, 169
Word Clearing Series 44
HCO B 6 Nov. 1972 ILLITERACY AND WORK, 170
Educating illiterate or semi-literate populations, 170
Example of educating a primitive culture, 170
Education mustn't skip gradients in culture or in training, 171
HCO B 15 Nov. 1972 STUDENTS WHO SUCCEED, 172
Honesty of a student, 172
Ethics must be in to get tech in, 172
Justice and ethics, 172
Symptoms of students who are withholding, 173
Pilot courses, 173
Confessionals on students, 173
Honest student is the most successful student, 174
Integrity Processing Series 10R
HCO B 13 Dec. 1972R INTEGRITY PROCESSING QUESTIONS MUST BE
F/Ned, 175
Main danger of Integrity Processing is not probing a person's past but
failing to do so thoroughly, 175
Never leave an Integrity Processing question unflat, 175
How to prevent Integrity Processing being left unflat, 175
Integrity Processing Series 11R
HCO B 14 Dec. 1972R GENERALITIES WON'T DO, 176
Best way to "miss" Integrity Processing question is to let the pc
indulge in generalities or "I thought........", 176
Handling general withholds and other people's withholds, 176
How to get withholds off an "irresponsible pc", 176
"Don't know" version of withhold pulling, 176
Integrity Processing Series 12R
HCO B 15 Dec. 1972R WITHHOLDS, MISSED AND PARTIAL, 178
Natterings, upsets, ARC breaks, critical tirades, lost students,
ineffective motions are restimulated but missed or partially
missed withholds, 178
Knowledge to the average person is only this: a knowledge of his
withholds, 178
Wild animal reaction that makes Man a cousin to the beasts, 178
Handling critical, upset, ARC breaky pc, 179
Integrity Processing Series 13
HCO B 16 Dec. 1972 HELP THE PC, 180
Use of steering in withhold pulling, 180
Pc is always willing to reveal, 180
If pc knew all the answer it wouldn't read on the E-Meter, 180
Integrity Processing Series 14
HCO B 17 Dec. 1972 HAVINGNESS, 181
Havingness is the concept of being able to reach; no-havingness is the
concept of not being able to reach, 181
Havingness must be run to get the benefit of having pulled most
withholds, 181
Study Series 9
HCO B 4 Jan. 1973 CONFRONT, 182
Definitions of confront, 182
If one can confront he can be aware; if one is aware one can perceive
and act, 182
HCO B 30 Mar. 1973 STEP FOUR-HANDLING ORIGINATIONS, 183
What is an origination of the preclear, 183
Three steps in handling an origin, 183
HCO B 5 Apr. 1973 AXIOM 28 AMENDED, 185
Axiom 28, 185
Formula of communication, 185
HCO B 7 Apr. 1973R GRADIENTS IN TRs, 186
How to do TRs, 186
Going over and over TR 0-4, 186
Cramming Series 10RA
HCO B 10 June 1973RA CRAMMING, 188
Qual does not take orders on what to do to correct, 188
HCO B 11 July 1973 ASSIST SUMMARY, 189
Medical examination and treatment and assists, 189
Causes of predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of injury and
illness, 189
Physical facts of injuries, illnesses and stresses, 190
Role of assists, 190
Don't confine handling of injuries to Touch Assist, 190
Actions of ministers, 191
Assist Summary steps, 191
Drug "five days" rule need not apply to assists, 192
Assist given over drugs, how to handle later, 192
Pc illness during grade auditing, 192
There is no conflict between minister and medical doctor, 192
Qual Flub Catch Series 4
HCO B 21 July 1973 RECOVERING STUDENTS AND PCS, 193
Five main reasons for student blows, 193
Reasons for pc blows, 194
Handling the blown student or pc, 194
HCO B 29 July 1973 ART, MORE ABOUT, 196
How good does a work of art have to be to be good, 196
Art for self-satisfaction vs. audience, 196
Technique of art, 197
Art to be good must have technical expertise itself adequate to
produce an emotional impact, 198
What is technical expertise, 198
"Technical expertise adequate to produce an emotional impact" and
"message", 199
Art quality and form, 199
Living itself is an art form, 199
HCO B 30 July 1973 SCIENTOLOGY, CURRENT STATE OF THE SUBJECT AND MATERIALS,
201
Extent of Scientology materials, 201
Scientology archives, 201
Development of Scientology, 201
Uses of Scientology, 202
Scientology's relation to healing, 203
Nutrition and biochemistry, 204
Physical ailments can resist spiritual improvement, 205
OT behavior, 206
HCO B 2 Aug. 1973 PEP, 207
Change of man's diet, 207
Sugar vs. protein, 207
Result of heavy intake of sugar and carbohydrates, 207
Proper diet, 208
HCO B 10 Aug. 1973 PTS HANDLING, 209
Cause of illness, 209
Three basic actions of handling PTS conditions, 209
Relation of PTS person to psychotic, 209
Apparent reasons for illness besides being PTS, 209
Predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of illness, 210
PTS handling by steps, 210
PTS "unburdening", 211
C/S Series 87
HCO B 15 Oct. 1973 NULLING AND F/Ning PREPARED LISTS, 213
Auditor outnesses causing a null prepared list, 213
The use of suppress and invalidate buttons and misunderstood word tech
on the list, 213
A prepared list either reads or F/Ns, 213
HCO B 30 Aug. 1971RC PC COMPLETIONS-SECOND REVISION, 214 [REPLACED]
Pc completion points, 214
HCO B 11 Nov. 1973 PRECLEAR DECLARE? PROCEDURE, 218
Examiner Declare? procedure, 218
HCO B 15 Nov. 1973R FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R, 219
Terminals list, 219
Emotions list, 219
Handling steps, 220
HCO B 20 Nov. 1973 Reissued from 21st ADVANCED CLINICAL COURSE TRAINING
DRILLS, 221
Anti-Q and A TR, 221
C/S Series 89
HCO B 20 Nov. 1973 F/N WHAT YOU ASK OR PROGRAM, 222
Auditor Q and A, 222
The auditor must F/N the original action, 222
Results of auditor Q and A, 222
Results of C/S Q and A, 222
HCO B 21 Nov. 1973 THE CURE OF Q AND A-MAN'S DEADLIEST
DISEASE, 223
The disease of Q and A, 223
Administrator Q and A, 223
C/S Q and A, 223
Q and A remedy steps, 224
HCO B 23 Nov. 1973 DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA, 226 [REVISED]
TA depends on normally moist hands, 226
Use of hand cream for dry hands, 226
Use of anti-perspirants for wet hands, 227
F/N and false TA, 227
Conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA, 227
C/S Series 53RF
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973 SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 228 [CANCELED]
HCO B 5 Dec. 1973 THE REASON FOR Q AND A, 230
What is meant by Q and A, 230
Q and A examples, 230
Q and A is simply postulate aberration, 230
State of person who Qs and As, 231
Body Q and A, 231
Cure for Q and A with a body, 232
C/S Series 90
HCO B 6 Dec. 1973 THE PRIMARY FAILURE, 233
Most common reason for failed sessions, 233
Remedy for an auditor who can't get reads on lists, 233
Requirements for making a list read, 234
Primary cause of C/S failure, 234
HCO B 15 Dec. 1973 THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H AND CONTINUOUS OVERT WITH DATA
ON DEGRADED BEINGS AND FALSE PTS CONDITIONS, 235
The continuous missed W/H, 235
The continuous overt, 235
Degraded beings, 23 6
Handling of continuous missed withhold and overt, 236
Motion slowness, 236
False PTS, 236
HCO B 6 Jan. 1974 ASSIST SUMMARY ADDITION, 237
Assist Summary addition steps, 237
HCO B 23 Jan. 1974 THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973!
THE INTROSPECTION RD, 239 [REVISED]
What is a psychotic break, 239
Wrong indication and psychotic break, 239
Theory of Introspection Rundown, 240
Auditor requirements, 240
Steps of the Introspection Rundown, 240
End phenomena of Introspection Rundown, 241
HCO B 27 Jan. 1974 DIANETICS-R3R COMMANDS HAVE BACKGROUND DATA, 243
Basics of engram running, 243
Inadequacy of a completely rote system, 244
HCO B 11 Apr. 1971R L3RC-DIANETICS AND EXT RD REPAIR LIST, 245
[REVISED]
HCO B 23 Jan. 1974R THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973!
THE INTROSPECTION RD, 249 [REVISED]
What is a psychotic break, 249
Wrong indication and psychotic break, 249
Theory of Introspection Rundown, 250
Auditor requirements, 250
Steps of the Introspection Rundown, 250
End phenomena of Introspection Rundown, 256
Expanded Dianetics Series 20
HCO B 15 Feb. 1974 SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY AND EXPANDED DIANETICS, 257
Service Facs by Dynamics, 257
Service facsimile theory, 257
Service facsimile handling, 258
C/S Series 91
HCO B 17 Feb. 1974 MUTUAL OUT RUDS, 259
Definition of "mutual out ruds", 259
C/S checks for mutual out ruds, 259
Handling of mutual out ruds, 259
HCO B 20 Feb. 1974 INTROSPECTION RD-ADDITIONAL ACTIONS, 260
Responsibility step, 260
Programming Introspection Rundown to fit the pc, 260
The cleared cannibal factor, 260
Isolation of person in psychotic break, 260
C/S action-cleared cannibal step, 261
HCO B 6 Mar. 1974 INTROSPECTION RD-SECOND ADDITION-INFORMATION TO C/SES-
FIXATED ATTENTION, 262
Fixated attention case, 262
Introversion and attention, 262
Anatomy and remedy of fixated attention, 262
Steps of handling fixated attention, 262
Release from isolation after psychotic break, 263
Additional cleared cannibal step, 263
C/Sing and auditing psychos, 264
Integrity of rundowns, 264
HCO B 11 Apr. 1971RA L3RD-DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST, 265
HCO B 17 Mar. 1974 TWC CHECKSHEETS-TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS, 270
Don't use a listing question in two-way comm, 270
What two-way comm questions must be limited to, 270
Examples of correct and incorrect two-way comm questions, 270
HCO B 18 Mar. 1974 E-METERS-SENSITIVITY ERRORS, 271
An auditor must set the sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly right for
each pc, 271
Too low sensitivity, 271
Too high sensitivity, 271
E-Meter sensitivity setting for individual cases, 271
HCO B 21 Mar. 1974 END PHENOMENA, 272
Definition of end phenomena, 272
Types of EPs, 272
Dianetic end phenomena, 272
Scientology end phenomena, 272
F/N abuse, 272
End phenomena errors, 272
OTs and EPs, 273
Remedy of auditor errors in handling end phenomena, 273
C/S Series 32RA
HCO B 4 Apr. 1971RA USE OF DIANETICS, 274
Tripling earlier Dianetics, 274
Full Flow Table, 274
Definitions of Flows 1, 2, 3 and 0, 274
Flow Zero command for the Introspection RD, 275
When to Triple narrative items or multiple somatic items, 275
Completing unfinished flows in Full Flow Dianetics, 275
Result of Full Flow Dianetics, 275
Offering FFD, 275
OT warning, 275
Expanded Dianetics Series 21
HCO B 28 Mar. 1974 EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE ORIGINAL
LECTURES, 276
Expanded Dianetics programming, 276
Expanded Dianetics set-ups, 276
Pc trouble on engrams, 276
Ex Dn rundowns, 276
Class VIII C/S-6 list, 276
Intentions in AEI Treble Assessments, 277
Evil purposes, 277
R/S Handling, also called the Responsibility RD, 277
The Wants Handled Rundown, 277
The Multiple-Flow E. Purp Rundown, 277
Ex Dn program is designed for an individual, 278
C/S Series 23RA
HCO B 17 Dec. 1971R INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY, 279
Quads canceled, 279
When is Int RD unnecessary, 279
When is Int RD overrun, 280
Repair of Int RD, 280
Two-way comm step, 280
C/Sing Int RD, 280
Int RD is a remedy, 280
Disability of auditor in running Int RD, 281
What the C/S does to win, 281
C/S Series 53RG
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973 SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 282 [CANCELED]
C/S Series 28RA
HCO B 7 Mar. 1971RA USE OF DIANETICS, 284
How to C/S a case for Triple Dianetics, 284
Dianetic Full Flow Table, 284
Int-Ext RD and Full Flow Table, 285
R3R flubs, 285
Results of Triple Dianetics, 285
Dianetic remedies and Triple Flows, 285
C/S Series 33RA
HCO B 5 Apr. 1971 RA TRIPLE RERUNS, 286
By-passed flows and mass, 286
The source of high TA, 286
Liability of rehabs, 286
Massy thetans, 286
Getting in all flows, 287
High TA and Triple Flows, 287
Pc not in trouble, 287
Pc in trouble, 287
Running Zero Flows, 288
Getting in Triple Flows-rehab or run, 288
Results of All Flows Rundown, 288
C/S Series 36RB
HCO B 21 Apr. 1971 RB DIANETICS, 289
Reason for TRs, 289
Rehabbing chains, 289
How to handle flubbed chains, 290
Use of L3RD, 290
Overrun and Full Flow Dianetics, 290
How to handle firefights, 291
Who can run Dianetics, Dianetic Triples, and Int-Ext RD, 291
C/S responsibility, 292
Risk involved in Full Flow Dianetics, 292
Introducing FFD, 292
Art Series 3
HCO B 10 Apr. 1974 STAGE MANNERS, 293
Basics of appearing before an audience, 293
Stage manners rules, 293
Stage manners drills, 294
HCO B 20 Apr. 1974 INTROSPECTION RD-THIRD ADDITION-ADDITIONAL INTROSPECTION
RD STEPS, 295
Introspection RD has as its dominant flow, Flow 0, 295
Additional steps, 295
Introspection Rundown caution, 296
Expanded Dianetics Series 22
HCO B 23 Apr. 1974 EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES, 297 [REVISED]
Ex Dn set-up checklist, 297
Art Series 4
HCO B 25 Apr. 1974 RHYTHM, 298
Definition of rhythm, 298
Six distinct types of rhythm in music, 298
Usage, 298
Repetition, 298
Rapport, 298
Impingement, 299
Rhythm in art forms, 299
HCO B 31 May 1974 UNHANDLED DRUGS AND ETHICS, 300
Drugs must be handled first in auditing, 300
Word Clearing Series 32RA
HCO B 22 Feb. 1972RA WORD CLEARING METHOD 4, 301
Use of Word Clearing Method 4, 301
Word Clearing Method 4 procedure, 301
Supervisor use of Word Clearing Method 4, 302
Word Clearing Series 53R
HCO B 8 July 1974R CLEAR TO F/N, 303
TA must be in normal range to start Word Clearing on meter, 303
All words must be F/Ned in Word Clearing on meter, 303
Word Clearing red tabs, 303
C/S Series 92R
HCO B 8 July 1974R WORD CLEARING ERRORS, 304
All words must be F/Ned, 304
Word Clearing worksheets must be placed in folders, 304
Case trouble and Word Clearing, 304
Word Clearing errors are red tabbed, 304
Handling of TA trouble at start of Word Clearing, 304
Word Clearing Series 42R
Tape Course Series 10
HCO B 17 Aug. 1972R METHOD 4 NOTES, 305
Too generalized a question in using Word Clearing Method 4 defeats its
use, 305
Break down the materials, 305
Word Clearing Method 4 of tapes, 305
Word Clearing Method 4 of books, 305
Errors in Word Clearing Method 4, 305
Expanded Dianetics Series 23
HCO B 17 July 1974 XDN CASE B, 307
Further data on XDn Series 9, 307
Drug Rundown is a must before Ex Dn, 307
Headache and Int-Ext, 307
C/S Series 53RH
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973R SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 308 [CANCELED]
C/S Series 93
HCO B 31 Aug. 1974 NEW GRADE CHART, 311
Changes in the Grade Chart, 311
Drug Rundown and Life Repair, 311
Expanded Dianetics, 311
Grade II, 311
Solo set-ups, 312
The full list of Grades showing where the various RDs now offered fit,
312
The Grade Chart and programming, 313
Word Clearing Series 54
HCO B 7 Sept. 1974 SUPERLITERACY AND THE CLEARED WORD, 314
Education and superliteracy, 314
What is superliteracy, 314
Action of superliterate illustrated, 316
Cleared words, 317
C/S Series 94
HCO B 25 Sept. 1974 REDUCTION OF REFUNDS-C/Ses AND OVERLOAD, 318
Overloaded C/Ses-cause of out tech and huge refund ratio, 318
Irreducible minimum C/S postings, 318
Additional types of C/Ses, 318
What is overload, 319
HCO B 26 Sept. 1974 HANDLING FLUBBED PCS, 320
Tech corrects its own flubbed pcs; it does not send them to Qual, 320
Tech action, 320
Red tag handling, 320
Qual action, 320
HCO PL 7 Apr. 1970RA GREEN FORM, 321
HCO B 6 Oct. 1974 THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN-THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH
OF 1974, 327
Overt of withholding vital information, 327
Research, 327
Withholding vital information in orgs, 327
Peculiarity of mechanism of withholding vital information, 328
When the Vital Information Rundown is given, 328
Vital Info RD by steps, 328
HCO B 9 Dec. 1971R PTS RUNDOWN, 330 [REVISED]
PTS phenomena, 330
Who does PTS Rundown, 330
Only PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a roller-
coast it comes from having known the person before this life,
330
Four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown, 331
PTS Rundown end phenomena, 331
The four parts of PTS Rundown, 331
Flows of PTS Rundown, 332
Re-dos if pc does not recover, 332
The commands of PTS Rundown, 332
Cramming Series 14
HCO B 15 Oct. 1974 CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS, 334
Result of cramming over out ruds, 334
Don't cram over out ruds, 334
Cramming Officer flubs, 334
Incomplete handling, 334
Maxim of Cramming, 335
HCO PL 19 Oct. 1974 THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS ON VITAL INFORMATION
LINES, 336
Dramatization of withholds, 336
Vital information, 336
Different ways to dramatize withholds, 336
An org's main product, 337
Remedy for the dramatization of withholds, 337
HCO B 9 Dec. 1971RA PTS RUNDOWN, 338
PTS phenomena, 338
Who does PTS Rundown, 338
Only PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a roller-
coaster comes from having known the person before this life, 339
Four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown, 339
Behavior of PTS RD, 339
PTS Rundown end phenomena, 340
Flows of PTS RD, 340
PTS Rundown re-dos, 340
PTS Rundown references, 340
PTS Rundown steps, 340
Past S&Ds, 340
Past PTS Interviews, 342
New S&Ds (3 S&Ds), 342
Troubled/worried, 342
Been after, 343
Planets, 343 PTS
Rundown repair, 343
HCO B 1 Nov. 1974 ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS, 344
Definition of rock slam, 344
Rock slammers, 344
Checklist to assist identification of R/Sers, 344
Pcs who R/S, 345
Rock slammer is different from someone with a rock slam, 345
HCO B 23 Jan. 1974RA THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973! THE INTROSPECTION
RD, 346
What is a psychotic break, 346
Wrong indication and psychotic break, 346
Theory of Introspection Rundown, 347
Auditor requirements, 347
Steps of the Introspection Rundown, 347
End phenomena of the Introspection Rundown, 353
HCO B 5 Nov. 1974 DRUGS, MORE ABOUT, 354
Withdrawal symptoms, 354
How to handle drug withdrawal symptoms, 354
Cal-Mag formula, 354
Cal-Mag replaces any tranquilizer, 355
C/S Series 53RI
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973RA SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 356 [CANCELED]
HCO B 15 Nov. 1974 STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST, 359
HCO B 4 Aug. 1971R POST PURPOSE CLEARING, 363
Instant Purpose Clearing, 363
Full Post Purpose Clearing, 363
Admin of Post Purpose Clearing, 363
Post Purpose Clearing steps, 364
HCO B 1 Dec. 1974 WORD CLEARING LISTS FOR PREPARED LISTS, 366
List of prepared lists with their word clearing lists, 366
HCO B 8 Dec. 1974 TR 0-NOTES ON BLINKING, 369
There is no such thing as blinkless TR 0, 369
Points on confronting, 369
Integrity Processing Series 6RA
HCO B 9 Dec. 1974 EFFECTIVENESS OF OVERTS IN PROCESSING, 370
ARC breaks, 370
Why overts work, 370
Expanded Dianetics Series 22R
HCO B 23 Apr. 1974R EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES, 372
Ex Dn set-up checklist, 372
HCO B 12 Jan. 1975 QUADS REINSTATED, 373
Quad Dianetics materials are reissued, 373
Quad rules, 3 73
Who to run on Quad, 373
C/S Series 28RA-1
HCO B 7 Mar. 1971 USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS, 374
How to C/S a case for Quadruple Dianetics, 374
Dianetic Full Flow Table, 3 74
Int-Ext RD and Full Flow Table, 375
Auditor requirements for Quad Dianetics, 375
R3R flubs, 375
C/Sing Quad Dianetics, 376
Promotion of Quad Dianetics, 376
Upper level auditors, 376
Results of Quad Dianetics, 376
Dianetic Remedies, 3 76
C/S Series 32RA-1R
HCO B 4 Apr. 1971-1R USE OF QUAD DIANETICS, 377
Tripling earlier Dianetic items, 377
Quadrupling earlier Dianetic items, 377
Int Rundown, 377
Reason to handle missing flows, 377
Full Flow Table, 378
Definitions of Flows 1, 2, 3 and 0, 378
Flow Zero command, 3 78
When to triple or quad narrative items or multiple somatic items, 378
Completing unfinished flows in Full Flow Dianetics, 378
Result of Full Flow Dianetics, 379
Offering FFD, 3 79
Quadruple Dianetics on Clears and OTs, 379
C/S Series 33RA-1
HCO B 5 Apr. 1971 TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS, 380
By-passed flows and mass, 380
The source of high TA, 380
Liability of rehabs, 380
Massy thetans, 380
Getting in all flows, 381
High TA and Quad Flows, 381
Pc not in trouble, 382
Pc in trouble, 382
Running Zero Flows, 382
Getting in Zero Flows-rehab or run, 382
Results of All Flows Rundown, 382
C/S Series 36RB-1R
HCO B 21 Apr. 1971-1R QUADRUPLE DIANETICS-DANGERS OF, 383
Auditor errors in running Quad Dianetics, 383
Requirements to run Quad Dianetics, 383
Reason for TRs, 383
Rehabbing chains, 384
How to handle flubbed chains, 384
Use of L3RD, 384
Overrun and Full Flow Dianetics, 385
How to handle firefights, 385
Interiorization RD, 386
Who can run Dianetics, Dianetic Quads, and Int-Ext RD, 386
C/S responsibility, 386
Risk involved in Full Flow Dianetics, 386
Introducing FFD, 386
HCO B 16 Jan. 1975 PAST LIFE REMEDIES, 388
Imaginary incidents, 388
AESPs that "would make one unwilling to go earlier than this life",
388
Drugs can prevent going backtrack, 388
Pc in recent shock of having died won't go backtrack, 388
Remedy for invalidation of past lives, 388
Children as cases, 388
Unburdening cases of children, 389
How to handle pc stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books,
389
Scientology Review action to make pc go backtrack, 389
HCO B 23 Jan. 1975 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII, 391
Purpose of Class VIII Course, 391
The original Class VIII Course has returned, 391
Training and skill of a Class VIII auditor, 391
How a Class VIII gets in standard tech, 391
Class VIII handling of lower level auditors, 391
HCO B 14 Feb. 1975 L10 PREREQUISITES, 392
Prerequisites to L10 are a completed Drug RD and Expanded Grades, 392
HCO B 2 Nov. 1957RA AN OBJECTIVE RUNDOWN, 393
Objective vs. subjective processes, 393
Objective Rundown steps, 393
HCO B 1 Oct. 1965R MUTTER TR, 395
Purpose, commands, position and training stress of Mutter TR, 395
Note on TR 2 and TR 4, 395
HCO B 7 Mar. 1975 EXT AND ENDING SESSION, 397
How to end session when pc exteriorizes on a good win, 397
Cramming Series 15
HCO B 18 Mar. 1975 METER USE IN QUAL, 397
Cramming actions done in Qual must be done on a meter, 397
C/S Series 53RJ
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973RB SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 398
HCO B 25 Mar. 1975 DIET, THEORY OF A NATURAL DIET, 401
Importance of food, 401
The human body, 401
Search for the natural diet of man, 401
The necessary first steps to discover man's correct diet, 401
How to find the elements of a natural diet, 402 Food supply, 402
HCO B 29 Mar. 1975 ANTI-BIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF, 403
Definition of anti-biotics, 403
Germs and virus, 403
Bringing down temperature with anti-biotics, 403
How to administer anti-biotics, 404
Anti-biotics and temperature, 404
The general rule when administering anti-biotics, 405
Anti-biotics taking effect, 405
Past maladministration of anti-biotics, 405
Person on anti-biotics is given vitamins before session, 405
Key procedure, 405 Side effects of anti-biotics, 405
Disease cycles, 406 Sulfa drugs, 406 Penicillin, 407
Oral penicillin is worthless, it has to be shot with a needle, 407
Types of anti-biotics, 407
Vitamins and anti-biotics, 407
Intestinal bacteria, 408
HCO B 19 Apr. 1975 OUT BASICS AND HOW TO GET THEM IN, 409
List of the out basics and references to correct them, 409
Auditing preclears in a bad and noisy environment, 409
Auditor not assessing and handling an ARC break that came up in
session, 409
False reads on W/Hs and asking for some W/Hs more than once will ARC
break the pc, 409
Auditing the pc over false TA, 409
Auditing over pc out of session, 410
Auditing the pc over Int-Ext misunderstoods, 410
Auditing the pc over misunderstoods on basic words, 410
Auditor calling the pc's attention to the meter or TA or his hands in
session, 410
Auditor F/Ning a question on something else, not the question asked,
410
Auditor carrying on past exterior and good win and asking "say or
ask", 410
Lack of knowledge of Flows, doing F0s on a Triple pc, 410
Auditor C/Sing in the chair, 411
Auditor doing 2WCs without a C/S, 411
False TA, 411
Auditor not getting false TA handled before session, 411
Auditor applying hand cream during a session, 411
Auditor overrunning due to false TA, 411
Auditor not writing down on worksheet what was done, 411
Auditor not writing down vital information in the worksheets, 412
Auditor having poor handwriting, illegible worksheets, 412
C/S not using the D of P for interview to get data after a failed
session, 412
C/S repairing the pc instead of the auditor, 412
Pc doesn't want auditing, 412
C/S agreeing with pc's demands for the next Grade despite all contrary
indicators, 412
C/S trying to fix "no EP" on one rundown by trying to run another
rundown, 413
C/S failing to call for an FES when he doesn't know after a failed
rundown, 413
C/S not reading the worksheets or missing corny errors and not
correcting the auditor, 413
HCO B 23 Apr. 1975 VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA, 414
Why vanishing cream doesn't work, 414
Hand creams for dry hands, 414
A note on footplates, 414
False TA handling, 414
False TA must be handled before session, 414
HCO B 23 Nov. 1973R DRY AND WET HANDS MAKE FALSE TA, 415
TA depends on normally moist hands, 415
Use of hand cream for dry hands, 415
Use of anti-perspirant for wet hands, 416
F/N and false TA, 416
Conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's TA, 416
HCO B 29 Feb. 1972RA FALSE TA CHECKLIST, 417
HCO PL 7 Apr. 1961 RA JOHANNESBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST
-REVISED, 419
Joburg Confessional List, 419
HCO B 23 Oct. 1975 TECHNICAL QUERIES, 424
Cause of technical queries, 424
Handle technical queries by reference and cramming, 424
C/S Series 95
HCO B 26 Oct. 1975 "FAILED" CASES, 426
There are no failed cases; there are only failed C/Ses and auditors,
426
Prepared lists clear up "failed cases", 426
Auditors who can't assess lists, 426
What it takes to make a real auditor, 426
Source of out tech, 426
Test of C/Ses and auditors, 427
HCO B 27 July 1976 PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RD POSITION
CORRECTED, 427-A
Restricting PTS handling and Vital Info RD to Expanded Dianetics is a
false position, 428
The actual position on the grade chart or in classes of the PTS
Rundown, 428
HCO B 9 Dec. 1971RB PTS RUNDOWN, 429
PTS phenomena, 429
Who does PTS Rundown, 429
Only PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a roller-
coaster comes from having known the person before this life, 430
Four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown, 430
The prerequisites for a PTS RD, 430
PTS RD is not restricted to Ex Dn but is a separate RD developed
before Ex Dn, 430
Behavior of PTS RD, 431
PTS Rundown end phenomena, 431
Flows of PTS RD, 431
PTS Rundown re-dos, 431
PTS Rundown references, 431
PTS Rundown steps, 432
Past S&Ds, 432
Past PTS Interviews, 432
New S&Ds (3 S&Ds), 432
Troubled/worried, 432
Been after, 433
Planets, 434
PTS Rundown repair, 434
HCO B 6 Oct. 1974R THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH
OF 1974, 435
Overt of withholding vital information, 435
Research, 435
Withholding vital information in orgs, 435
Peculiarity of mechanism of withholding vital information, 436
When the Vital Information Rundown is given, 436
The Prerequisite for public is Drug RD, 436
Vital Info RD by steps, 436
HCO B 10 Aug. 1976 R/SES, WHAT THEY MEAN, 440
The term was taken from a process in the '50s, 440
A "Rockslam" can be caused sometimes by leaving rings on the pc's
fingers or by a short circuit in the meter or by the cans
(electrodes) touching something like a dress, 440
One must always report a rockslam in the auditing report, 440
The rockslam is the most important needle manifestation, 440
You don't ever indicate rockslams or theta bops to the pc, 441
Rocket read, 441
A rockslam means a hidden evil intention on the subject or question
under discussion or auditing, 441
Two things underlie insanity, 441
One rockslam doesn't make a psychotic, 442
When R/Ses most easily turn on, 442
How you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is handled, 442
What then DOES HANDLE an R/S?, 443
Expanded Dianetics handling of R/Ses, 443
What do you do when you see an R/S, 443
C/S Series 96
HCO B 24 Oct. 1976 DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS, 445
There's nothing wrong with your CF, your pc, your student, staff
member or your delivery that a prepared list won't handle, 445
The "Prepared Lists" system, 445
The only reason ever found for prepared lists not working, 445
Qual "Okay to Audit" Checksheets, 445
A C/S must know what lists to use, 446
Prepared lists for preclears, 446
Prepared lists for students, 447
Prepared lists for staffs, 448
Word lists for prepared lists, 449
Translated lists for non-English speaking orgs, 449
C/S Series 97
HCO B 20 Oct. 1976 AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF, 450
There are many ways of falsifying an auditing report, 450
The person whose auditing reports have been falsified is easy to spot
in folders and reports, 450
The penalty for knowingly falsifying an auditing report, 451
C/S Series 98
HCO B 28 Oct. 1976 AUDITING FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN
COMPLETENESS, 452
Omissions from folders and complete loss of folders is a very serious
matter, 452
The commonest (and most senseless) omissions from folders, 452
Loss of a pc's folder and omissions from a pc's folder shall be
actionable by a Committee of Evidence, 453
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 JANUARY 1972RA
REVISED & REISSUED AS HCO B 20 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Auditors CANCELS
Class III BTB OF 1 JANUARY 1972R
and above SAME TITLE
LIX HI-LO TA LIST REVISED
(Cancels earlier list HCO Bs 17 Feb 71
and 22 Feb 71 and 25 Feb 71 and 3 March 71
and 13 March 71 and 1 Jan 72.)
This assessment has been developed to detect all the reasons for high
and low TA. There is nothing unusual about the processes necessary to
handle these points. This is the full list and is used when a C/S Series
53RI has been done and the high or low TA persists.
Interiorization or a flubbed Interiorization R/D that must be run with
WENT IN is the usual reason. Listing errors and out rudiments are another
reason.
The list is assessed Method 5. Handle the reads in the order given on
HCO B 10 June 71, C/S Series 44R. Any reading questions must be carried to
F/N by major action or 2-Way Comm. Can be taken to full F/Ning list.
Must be done by an Auditor who can make a list read with Cramming on TR
1 and Cramming on HCO Bs 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24, 9 June 71 C/S Series 41,
20 Dec 71 C/S Series 72, 15 June 72 C/S Series 80, 15 Oct 73 C/S Series 87,
20 Nov 73 C/S Series 89, 6 Dec 73 C/S Series 90 and BTB 16 June 71R, Issue
I (formerly HCO B 16 June 71 R, Issue II).
HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT
1A. IS YOUR INT R/D UNFLAT? _________
If the pc has had an Int R/D, do an Int R/D Correction List and handle
the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71, Revised 14 May 74.) If the pc has never
had an Int R/D, then give him a standard Int R/D providing you have
checked out on the Int-Ext pack and have drilled the procedure.
2A. WAS YOUR INT R/D MESSED UP? _________
Int R/D Correction List.
3A. IS YOUR INT R/D OVERRUN? _________
Int R/D Correction List.
4A. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER EXTERIOR? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
5A. ARE YOU TRAPPED? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
6A. YOU WENT IN. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
7A. GO IN. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
8A. ARE YOU OUT AND CAN'T GET IN? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
9A. ARE YOU IN AND CAN'T GET OUT? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
10A ARE YOU URGENTLY TRYING TO LEAVE? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
11A DO YOU WANT TO GET OUT? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
12A WERE YOU KICKED OUT OF SPACES? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
13A YOU CAN'T GO. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
_________
1B. IS THERE A LIST ERROR? _________
Do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find that have not been
corrected. Lacking these, do an L4BR in general. You can go over an
L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the whole L4BR gives
nothing but F/Ns.
2B. HAS A LIST BEEN OVERLISTED? _________
Find out which and handle with an L4BR.
3B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG ITEM? _________
L4BR and handle.
4B. ARE YOU UPSET WITH GIVING ITEMS TO THE AUDITOR? _________
L4BR and handle.
5B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG INDICATION? _________
L4BR and handle.
6B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG WHY? _________
L4BR on the Why Finding. Get the correct Why.
7B. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN A WRONG PTS ITEM? _________
L4BR on that PTS Interview. Watch for earlier out PTS Interviews and if
they exist, L4BR the earliest one. Watch for earlier S&Ds and if out,
correct the earliest of each kind with an L4BR.
8B. ARE YOU NOT SATISFIED WITH AN ITEM FOUND ON
THE LIST? _________
L4BR. Correct the List.
9B. HAVE READING ITEMS BEEN LEFT CHARGED UP? _________
L4BR and handle if L&N lists otherwise spot them and clean them by
taking to F/N.
_________
1C. DO YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF WITHHOLD? _________
Pull it (them) E/S to F/N. Use "Who" if discreditable.
2C. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING SOMETHING? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N. Use "Who" if discreditable.
3C. IS ANOTHER WITHHOLDING SOMETHING FROM YOU? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
4C. ARE OTHERS WITHHOLDING SOMETHING FROM OTHERS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
5C. HAS ANOTHER COMMITTED OVERTS ON YOU? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
6C. HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
7C. HAVE OTHERS COMMITTED OVERTS ON OTHERS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
8C. ARE YOU NOT-ISING OVERTS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
9C. YOU'RE NOT SAYING? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
1OC HAVE YOU COMMITTED CRIMES? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
11C ARE YOU COMMITTING CRIMES IN PT? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
12C ARE YOU PROTESTING? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
13C ARE YOU HIDING? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
14C YOU DON'T LIKE IT. _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
15C ARE THERE UNDISCLOSED PROBLEMS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
16C IS THERE A LIE? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
I 7C ARE THERE CONSIDERATIONS NOT MENTIONED? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
18C DO YOU HAVE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
19C ARE YOU HERE FOR UNDISCLOSED REASONS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
20C ARE YOU NOT TELLING YOUR AUDITOR YOUR COG-
NITIONS? _________
Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N.
21C ARE YOU WITHHOLDING YOUR ACTUAL CASE STATE? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
22C ARE YOU UNWILLING TO TALK TO THE AUDITOR? _________
2wc on things he can't say E/S to F/N.
23C. ARE THERE DISAGREEMENTS? _________
Run 2wc E/S to F/N: Fl. Tell me about others' disagreements with you.
F2. Tell me about your disagreements with others. F3. Tell me about
others' disagreements with others.
24C HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? _________
PROBLEM? _________
WITHHOLD? _________
Indicate it and handle E/S to F/N.
25C DO YOU FEEL SAD? _________
Handle the ARC Break as an ARC Break of Long Duration.
26C DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
Handle the ARC Break.
27C DO YOU FEEL UPSET? _________
Handle the ARC Break.
28C DO YOU FEEL RUSHED? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
29C DO YOU FEEL TIRED? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
30C YOU CAN'T GET IT. _________
Find out what and 2wc E/S to F/N.
_________
1D. ARE YOU TAKING OR SMOKING DRUGS? _________
2wc to F/N. Rehab releases on each "Drug" taken to F/N. If pc has had a
Drug R/D, do L3RD on it and handle. Program the pc for a Drug R/D or
verification of it if it is incomplete or there are "No Interest"
items.
2D. DID YOU ONCE TAKE DRUGS? _________
2wc to F/N. Rehab releases on each drug to F/N. L3RD on Drug R/D if he
had one. Program for Drug R/D or verification if incomplete.
3D. HAVE YOU TAKEN LSD? _________
2wc to F/N. Drug Rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had one. Program for
full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
4D. HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________
2wc to F/N. Drug/Alcohol Rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had one.
Program for full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
5D. HAVE YOU SMOKED POT? _________
2wc to F/N. Drug Rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had one. Program for
full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
6D. ARE YOU TAKING MEDICINE? _________
2wc to F/N. Drug/Medicine Rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had one.
Program for full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
7D. DID YOU ONCE TAKE MEDICINE? _________
2wc to F/N. Drug/Medicine Rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had one.
Program for full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
1E. IS THERE AN ENGRAM IN RESTIMULATION? _________
Find out which and do L3RD and handle per its instructions.
2E. ARE THERE UNFLAT CHAINS? _________
Find out what chains and L3RD on each.
3E. DO YOU HAVE A STUCK PICTURE? _________
Indicate it. Do an L3RD on it. You can also unstick it by having him
recall a time before it and recall a time after it. D/L if necessary.
C/S can order Pictures and Masses Remedy Dn done after this list is
handled-if necessary.
4E. DO YOU HAVE PICTURES IN RESTIMULATION? _________
L3RD and handle. Pictures and Masses Remedy Dn.
5E. DO YOU HAVE MASSES IN RESTIMULATION? _________
L3RD and handle. Pictures and Masses Remedy Dn.
6E. HAS THE SAME ENGRAM BEEN RUN TWICE? _________
L3RD and handle.
7E. YOU CAN'T SEE ENGRAMS TOO WELL. _________
Do L3RD Method 5 and handle. Program for L3RD Rundown if necessary.
8E. IS IT INVISIBLE? _________
Spot the invisible field or picture. L3RD on it and handle.
9E. IS IT ALL BLACK? _________
Spot the black field or picture. L3RD on it and handle.
10E HAS THERE BEEN A LOSS? _________
Do L3RD on it and handle. Run it out R3R Triple if not run out and
still not handled.
11E HAVE YOU LOST ANYTHING? _________
Do L3RD on it and handle. If not yet run out and still unhandled run
R3R Triple.
_________
1F. HAS THE SAME THING BEEN RUN TWICE? _________
Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
2F. HAS THE SAME ACTION BEEN DONE BY ANOTHER AUDI-
TOR? _________
Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
_________
1G. ARE YOU DOING SOMETHING WITH THE MIND BETWEEN
SESSIONS? _________
Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such, 2wc E/S
to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if
TA now down, do L1C on that period of pc's life.
2G. ARE YOU INVOLVED IN SOME OTHER PRACTICE? _________
Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such, 2wc E/S
to first time done, L1C on the prior upset or period of pc's life just
before that.
1H. ARE THERE WORD CLEARING ERRORS? _________
Do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads.
2H. ARE THERE STUDY ERRORS? _________
2wc E/S to F/N and add a Student Rehabilitation List (HCO B 15 Nov 74)
or full Study Correction List (BTB 4 Feb 72RC) to the pc's Program.
_________
1I. HAVE YOU EVER HAD TROUBLE WITH YOUR TA OR F/Ns? _________
Use HCOBs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72, 23 Nov 73, all on
False TA. Then clean up the bypassed charge with 1) Assess for best
read a) TA worries b) F/N worries. 2) Then 2wc times he has worried
about (item) E/S to F/N. 3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA
obscuring F/Ns.
2I. HAVE YOU HAD A FALSE TA? Handle as in 1I. _________
3I. ARE YOU USING THE WRONG SIZED CANS? Handle as in 1I. _________
4I. DO YOUR HANDS GET TIRED IN AUDITING? Handle as in 1I. _________
5I. ARE YOUR HANDS DRY? Handle as in 1I. _________
6I. ARE YOUR FEET DRY? Handle as in 1I. _________
7I. ARE YOUR HANDS WET? Handle as in 1I. _________
8I. ARE YOUR FEET WET? Handle as in 1I. _________
9I. DO YOU LOOSEN YOUR GRIP ON THE CANS? Handle as in 1I. _________
10I ARE YOU USING THE WRONG HAND CREAM? Handle as in 1I _________
_________
1J. HAVE YOU BEEN SELF AUDITING? _________
2wc to first time. L1C on the prior upset or if prior upset was in
auditing use the appropriate correction list and an L1C on that time.
2J. WAS A WRONG OVERRUN FOUND? _________
Correct it to F/N by indication and rehabbing the right overrun.
3J. HAS THERE BEEN AN OVERRUN IN LIFE? _________
Locate, indicate, rehab to F/N.
4J. HAS THERE BEEN AN OVERRUN IN AUDITING? _________
Locate, indicate, rehab to F/N.
5J. HAS THERE BEEN SOMETHING WRONG WITH F/Ns? _________
Indicate. 2wc E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
6J. HAVE F/Ns BEEN OVERRUN? _________
Indicate. 2wc E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
7J. HAVE F/Ns NOT BEEN INDICATED? _________
Indicate. 2wc E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
8J. HAVE F/Ns BEEN MISSED? _________
Indicate. 2wc E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
9J. HAVE AUDITING QUESTIONS NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD? _________
2wc, get them properly understood with Word Clearing, E/S if needed to
F/N.
1OJ HAVE ITEMS NOT REALLY READ? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
11J DID YOU SAY SOMETHING MUST HAVE READ? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
12J WERE YOU STILL UPSET WHEN SOMEBODY THOUGHT IT
WAS HANDLED? _________
Find and handle to F/N.
13J HAVE YOU HAD BAD AUDITING? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
14J ARE THERE INCOMPLETE ACTIONS? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
15J HAS THERE BEEN ANY INVALIDATION? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
16J HAS THERE BEEN ANY EVALUATION? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
17J COULDN'T YOU GET AUDITING? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
18J HAVE THERE BEEN INTERRUPTIONS? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
19J DOES YOUR AUDITOR OVERWHELM YOU? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
20J DO YOU FEEL ATTACKED? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
21J ARE YOU SCARED OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IN AUDIT-
ING? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
22J ARE YOU TALKING TO OTHERS ABOUT YOUR CASE? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
23J ARE YOU LISTENING TO OTHERS TALK ABOUT THEIR
CASES? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
24J HAVE YOU BEEN LOOKING AT OR LISTENING TO TECH
MATERIALS YOU SHOULDN'T? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
25J ARE YOU WAITING FOR SOMETHING TO HAPPEN? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
_________
1K. SOME SORT OF CAN'T HAVE? _________
Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
2K. IS YOUR HAVINGNESS LOW? _________
Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
_________
1L. IS SOMEONE OR SOMETHING HOSTILE TO YOU? _________
Check for SP with a PTS Interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
2L. ARE YOU PTS? _________
PTS Interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
3L. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE HOSTILE TO DIA-
NETICS OR SCIENTOLOGY? _________
PTS Interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
4L. DO YOU FEEL SUPPRESSED? _________
PTS Interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
_________
1M. HAS SOMETHING GONE ON TOO LONG? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow if qualified).
2M. YOU WENT ON BY A RELEASE POINT? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
3M. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
4M. THE AUDITOR KEPT ON GOING. _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
5M. HAS THERE BEEN ANY OVER-REPAIR? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
6M. ARE YOU PUZZLED ABOUT WHY THE AUDITOR KEEPS
ON? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
7M. ARE THERE STOPS? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
_________
1N. HAVE YOU SEPARATED OUT? _________
2wc E/S to F/N. Then Triple Expanded Grade Two or L10 on Advance
Program.
2N. ARE YOU SOMEBODY ELSE? _________
2wc E/S to F/N. Program for LX Lists.
3N. DO YOU THINK SOMETHING ELSE IS WRONG? _________
2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item is covered by one of the
other questions on the list, handle per instructions. Otherwise, GF M5
and handle.
4N. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY ILL? _________
2wc to find what. Note BD item. 2wc to F/N and get further C/S
instructions for handling if necessary.
_________
1O. ARE WE REPAIRING A TA THAT ISN'T HIGH? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA, handle per 1I
above.
2O. ARE WE REPAIRING A TA THAT ISN'T LOW? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA, handle per 1I
above.
3O. IS THE METER FAULTY? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first.
4O. IS THERE NOTHING WRONG? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first.
_________
1P. WAS THERE A FALSE EXAM REPORT? _________
Indicate and 2wc to F/N.
2P. HAVE YOU HAD TO WAIT AT THE EXAMINER? _________
Indicate and 2wc to F/N.
3P. HAVE YOU BEEN UPSET BY THE EXAMINER? _________
Indicate and 2wc to F/N.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JANUARY 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 30
WC1 COMES FIRST
Don't try to Word Clear Materials by Word Clearing Method 2 before the
person has had a Word Clear Method 1.
Actual experience shows that doing WC2 without WC1 restimulates earlier
charge on words that have been misunderstood in the past.
When a person has not had Word Clear Method I and tries to do Word
Clear Method 2 on materials, it can go very slowly, the student (due to
earlier charge on words) can become quite misemotional.
Using Method 3 (going back to find the misunderstood word) is all
right. And using common ordinary "Look up, don't go past a misunderstood
word" is all right.
METHOD 2 EP
The End Phenomena (what occurs at the end) of Word Clearing Method 2 is
a continuing F/N on the materials.
When the person is constantly F/Ning on the materials being word
cleared Method 2, that is the time to end off. The "EP" has been reached.
When the word clearer forces the student to go on beyond this, the
reads gotten are often false or are from protest.
Reads that are false come from cognitions (realizations) on the
material. Protest reads come from just plain annoyance with having to go
on.
When the EP of 2 is reached on a specific set of materials, the student
is then permitted to go on by himself, looking up words he doesn't know or
going back to find one that was missed.
A person who enters a new subject or a new branch of a subject should
be given WC2 on it. A person who begins a higher level of a subject should
be given WC2 on it.
If thereafter there is any bog or failure to understand or apply or
pass an exam on the subject, a WC Correction List can be done on it and the
bog found and handled.
This EP is only valid if the person has had WC Method 1 before the WC
Method 2 was begun.
The EP of Method 2 can be many times repeated on different subjects or
branches of subjects.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1972
Remimeo
Auditors
Interns
C/Ses
C/S Series 69 ADDITION
C/SING CHECKLIST
(If a copy of C/S Series 69 is
posted on the wall, also post this.)
Nothing in this checklist for C/Sing relieves the auditor or C/S from
full knowledge of the entire C/S Series. Nothing in the C/S Series is
changed by this checklist.
ADDITION
No. 10. Add. The time-honored way of seeing what has to be repaired in
a Case not running well is:
GO BACK IN THE FOLDER TO WHERE THE CASE WAS RUNNING WELL AND COME
FORWARD.
The major error or departure is in the very next session after that.
The bugs after the high point should be repaired as the fast action to set
the case going again.
The repair and handling of bogged cases is the finest skill of a C/S.
Really it is why he is there.
To do this he has to know the C/S Series thoroughly, know all the
materials of all levels he is C/Sing better than the auditor.
The use of prepared lists, WC Correction List, Green Form, C/S 53, Hi-
Lo TA, GF 40 RR, Int-Ext Corr List, L1C and others, including "Have
Examiner ask the pc what happened in session" are used to get information
and correct as well as folder studies. KNOW BEFORE YOU GO.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JANUARY 1972
Remimeo
EDs
HAS
Dept 1
Qual Secs
Interne Supers
Ds of P
Cramming officers
C/Ses
TRAINING AND INTERNING STAFF AUDITORS
First and foremost WHEN YOU START OUT TO TRAIN AN AUDITOR REALLY
HONESTLY DO IT.
Don't monkey about with it, or half do it, or brush it off. Actually
GET IT DONE. Get a finished capable able to audit in high volume with high
quality AUDITOR.
Each auditor is an individual. You can't train a mass of auditors. You
can train individual auditors. This has to be kept in sight despite having
a lot of students in a class.
In other words you take this person and push him on through and get the
job of training DONE.
HCO
To begin a staff auditor trainee is selected because he wants to be an
auditor, has a fair study record, has NO serious Ethics history and No
psychiatric background. If you violate these points you will not get an
auditor and if you select one with an actual insane history you will be
violating the Auditor's Code.
HCO Dept I is the recruiting point for auditors. If HCO fails, it's up
to the D of P or even the Executive Director to get auditor trainees.
In recruiting staff auditors it is done 1 for 1 with Admin hirings.
Usually already existing staff and Dianetic Course or Academy students
are the personnel pools for auditor trainees.
When field auditors are brought into the org who have never done org
interneships they go this same route, regardless of their class. If already
classed, such as VIII, they are simply faster to make into staff auditors.
INTERNE SUPERVISOR
The moment someone is designated as a staff auditor trainee he comes
under the Interne Supervisor. He remains under the control of the Interne
Supervisor throughout his entire span as long as he is in the org and until
he has his final HGC okay to audit for the class of that org.
If the org sends him off for higher classes, he is again under the
Interne Supervisor.
The Interne Supervisor is in Qual Division V. In a small org it is
combined with Cramming Officer. In a tiny org it is combined with Cramming
Officer and Qual Sec. But if this last is done there must also be a word
clearer-programmer in Qual.
PROGRAMMED
The moment the trainee comes under the Interne Super he is PROGRAMMED.
The Programming is standard. It is varied only to take account of what
the trainee
has already done in the way of Basic Staff Hat, Staff Status, word clearing
and formal courses in auditing.
All trainees into an org begin at the bottom regardless of class.
A typical standard program would be:
WC1 .
WC2 earliest materials read or heard.
Staff Status I.
Basic Staff Hat (Vol 0 OEC).
SS II Tech Div.
Problems Of Work WC2 star rate and clay demo.
This HCOB.
Interne HCOBs and P/Ls.
Student Hat.
HDC in the Dianetics Course (no auditing required for provisional cert
for a staff trainee).
HDC Interne Pack in Interneship for preliminary okay to audit
Dianetics.
Dianetic Auditing as an Interne under D of P and/or C/S.
High Hour Flubless Record achieved on Dianetics resulting in final HGC
okay to audit Dianetics-a fully validated Dianetic Cert.
Academy 0 to IV study to Provisional Class IV full time on Academy.
0-IV Interne Pack study.
0-IV preliminary HGC okay to audit. Auditing under D of P and/or C/S.
High Hour Flubless Record achieved on 0-IV resulting in final HGC okay
to audit and fully validated HGC Class IV.
In a Class IV org the program would be just as above.
AUTHORITY
All this time, the trainee's top boss is the Interne Supervisor. This
does not diminish the authority of a Course Super over the trainee when he
is on a course or the Cramming Officer when he is in Cramming.
When he has his final HGC okay for Dianetics he could be off the
Interneship if he were just to go on with Dianetics. But in an org this has
its limitations. A C/S has trouble getting a program done where an auditor
cannot fly ruds or do a correction list so it is best to carry on to Class
IV HGC final okay to audit.
UPPER ORGS
In a Saint Hill or an Advanced Org the standard program goes right on
up as follows.
In a Class IV org where a staff auditor is sent to a higher org, he
comes again under his own org Interne Supervisor even though he is gone. It
used to be that the Staff Training Officer kept track of students gone to a
higher org for training but this has not worked. It is best that the
Interne Super carries on and keeps track of him and gets him DONE and back.
Before a trainee is sent at org expense he has to sign a five-year contract
beginning the five years after he returns. He is liable for full cost
personally if contract broken plus penalty charges.
Class V in the SHSBC.
Class VI in the SHSBC.
Class VII SHSBC. His previous org Interneship is credited and he goes
into Power auditing. If no previous Interneship he does the whole
trip as above up to this point.
Class V, VI, VII Interne Pack under upper org Interne Super.
Class V, VI, VII Interne auditing under D of P of upper org.
High Hour Flubless auditing resulting in final HGC ok to audit in upper
org and validated cert.
Class VIII Course.
Class IX Course.
Class VIII and IX Interneship Pack under Interne Super of the Class
VIII org.
Class VIII and IX Auditing under D of P of higher org.
High Hour Flubless auditing resulting in an HGC okay to audit and fully
validated Class IX certificate.
Special C/S Course including AO lines.
C/S Interneship in the higher org.
Flubless C/Sing resulting in an HGC okay to C/S.
Class X Course.
Class X Interne Pack.
Class X Auditing under D of P.
High Hour Flubless Class X auditing resulting in a Class X HGC okay to
audit and a fully validated certificate.
Class XI and XII Course.
Class XI and XII Interne Pack.
Class XI and XII Auditing under D of P.
High Hour Flubless Class XI and XII auditing resulting in an HGC okay
to audit Class XI and XII and fully validated cert.
Flag Class XII and Solo C/S Course.
Flag Programming and repair of all omissions under Interne Super.
Flubless C/Sing on all lines.
HIGHER ORG
Where a trainee for an org goes to a higher org he is under the Interne
Super of the higher org to whom the Interne Super of the lower org can
write. This line is to speed up such trainees.
ADMIN
To get such points DONE, accurate admin is vital.
A checklist of all points in the above program is made up with the
trainee's name on it and is kept up, with dates by the Interne Supervisor.
This is kept in an Auditor Interne File, which files are kept by the
Interne Supervisor. Thus at any time he can catch up any fall-off-the-lines
and get the trainee going again.
A vertical Auditor Trainee Progress Board is kept by the Interne
Supervisor. This has a space under each of the headings, left to right.
Boxes along the top, left to right, serve to indicate the exact action the
trainee is doing.
The trainee's name is on a tab that is pinned to the space. The name
tab is newly dated each time it is moved to the right. Thus the Interne
Super can chase up any faltering student.
Various bugs occur-the student is held in the HGC as an auditor because
of HGC hours stat. The course gets flubby and 3 weeks becomes 4. Or
somebody has illegally put the student on a special project and he's off
the course. HCO begins to use the students as a personnel pool, etc, etc.
Or the student bogs for lack of cramming or case repair.
The Interne Super's stat is COMPLETIONS of steps on the board. One
point for each left to right move of a trainee's name.
Thus the Interne Super has a vested interest in recruiting trainees or
his stats will collapse.
PAID STUDENTS
It is wise to greatly prefer that students pay for their training
before being recruited.
Purely for free services have a bad history in orgs.
As this Interneship is ALSO the same Interneship for paying students
only a portion should be staff trainees as such. The difference is that the
staff trainee must be contracted to the org and must continue on in the
HGC.
Only the very best, most ethical fast study trainees should ever be
sent to a higher org. The percentage of losses is too high otherwise. It is
too hard on the org's income otherwise.
If somebody else just must go to a higher org, let him pay his own way.
Don't make your org a subject of freeloading. It hurts your own pay.
PART TIME
Part-time study, by which an HGC auditor part-time studies the next
level while still auditing IS A COMPLETE FAILURE. By actual record they
just never make it.
Do the steps fully with full attention on each while it is being done.
Don't have the trainee finishing the last one and doing the next one.
You'll rarely get a product.
Sharply and efficiently and crisply get each step of the horizontal
board full and industriously DONE each in turn.
And you'll make splendid auditors and make them fast.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JANUARY 1972
Remimeo
STUDY CORRECTION LIST
Ref: HCO B 9 Nov 67 Revision of Remedy A, Remedy B and S and
Ds
HCO B 14 Aug 68 Remedy B-Environment and "New Style"
HCO B 23 Nov 69 Student Rescue Intensive
HCO B 30 June 71 W/C Series 8RR
HCO B 12 Oct 71 Method No. 2 Word Clearing Form
HCO B 21 July 71 Word Clearing Correction List
HCO B 1 Dec 71 Rising Scale Processing Issue III
HCO B 1 Dec 71 Effort Processing Issue IV
HCO B 9 Dec 71 PTS Rundown
HCO B 1 Aug 68 The Laws of Listing and Nulling
HCO B 19 Mar 71 List-1-C
HCO B 1 Dec 71 Triple Ruds Long Duration Issue II
HCO B 19 Jan 66 Danger Conditions-Technical Data for Review
Auditors
1. Has there been an upset about study? _________
Fly all ruds triple, "In study has there been______?"
2. Has there been a Misunderstood Word? _________
Find it, get it looked up and correct it.
3. Have there been upsets in getting Words Cleared up? _________
WC Corr List and handle.
4. Have there been misunderstood subjects? _________
Give person Word Clear 1 or get the Word Clear 1 already done redone
with the missing subjects added to the WC 1 Standard C/S.
5. Have you ever been punished because you wouldn't learn? _________
R3R Narrative Triple.
6. Have you been taught by someone you didn't like or hated?
_________
PTS Rundown with an additional S&D in step (a); L&N "Who has tried to
teach you that you didn't like?" + L&N "Who have you taught that you
didn't like?" Use remaining PTS steps on the names.
7. Have you ever gotten in trouble because you knew something?
_________
R3R Triple.
8. Would knowledge make you too powerful? _________
Run (1) "What have you done with knowledge?" (2) "What have you
withheld?" Alternate repetitive. (By an upper level auditor, Evil
Purpose RD or L9S as case may R/S.)
9. Have you studied the same subject more than once? _________
"Why did you have to study the same subject more than once?" 2wc E/S to
F/N.
10. Have you failed to complete courses you took? _________
2wc "What courses have you failed to complete?" E/S to F/N. Followed by
WC 1 Actions on courses named.
11. Have you continued to study a subject you had already grasped?
_________
Find the point of win. Rehab it. (Upper level auditor, date locate
point of win.)
12. Do you try to get out of classrooms or schools? _________
R3R Triple on Fl "Locate a time when you were made to go to school or
class." F2 "Locate a time when you made someone go to school or class."
F3 "Locate a time when another made others go to school or class." R3R.
(Quad would be F0, "Locate a time when you made yourself go to school
or class."-F0 not necessary.)
13. Are you trying to do something else with study? _________
L&N to BD F/N item, "What are you trying to do with study?" (Upper
level auditor, date to blow locate to blow item.)
14. Have you pretended to have studied things you hadn't? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
15. Have you pretended to have qualifications you did not actually
attain? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
16. Have you ever lied to a teacher? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
17. Have you ever cheated on an exam? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
18. Have you ever committed overts on students? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
19. Have you ever damaged study materials or books? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
20. Have you ever failed to apply what you learned? _________
2wc E/S to F/N.
21. Have there been upsets in study? _________
L1C "On study _______" each reading item to F/N.
22. Are you trying to solve some Mystery? _________
L&N "What Mystery are you trying to solve?" to BD F/N item. (Upper
level auditor date to blow locate to blow. )
23. Has anyone ever considered that you were stupid? _________
PTS RD. Step (a) add L&N "Who has considered you stupid or mentally
retarded?" L&N "Whom have you considered stupid?" L&N "Whom have others
considered stupid?" Then handle as in PTS RD.
24. Do you have bad eyesight or eyestrain? _________
Effort Processing and Rising Scale. (Upper level auditors, if this
persists, L10.)
25. Are you trying to forget something? _________
L&N "What are you trying to forget?" to BD F/N item. (Upper level
auditors then date to blow, locate to blow.)
26. Would someone else win if you did become educated? _________
2wc to F/N. (In extreme cases showing misemotion on this add to PTS RD
(a).)
27. Do you have disagreements in study?
2wc E/S to F/N then "What do you agree with in study?" 2wc E/S to F/N.
28. Do you invalidate yourself in study? _________
2wc to F/N followed by "What confusion came before that?" 2wc E/S to
F/N.
29. There is some other reason not given? _________
2wc to F/N.
30. There was really nothing wrong with study in the first place?
_________
Indicate to pc.
31. Repairing study was an unnecessary action. _________
Indicate to pc. Rehab when he felt okay about study.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ih
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO B was canceled by HCO B 4 February 1972, Study Correction List
Revised, which was revised four times, the most recent revision being BTB 4
February 1972RD, Study Correction List Revised, which may be found as
number 7 in the Study Series, Volume IX, page 329.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JANUARY 1972
Remimeo
PTS RD ADDITION
(Refers to PTS RD HCOB 9 Dec 71)
The only reasons a PTS RD does not work are:
C/S Error: 1. Not doing one at all.
C/S Error: 2. Doing one in the middle of another RD.
C/S Error: 3. Doing one without set-up.
C/S Error: 4. The person was not PTS-which is to say was not
chronically ill or roller coaster and the items didn't read.
Auditor Error: 5. The RD was badly run auditor-wise. R3R was bad,
metering poor, ruds not correctly or fully done.
Auditor & C/S Error: 6. The RD was quickie, only doing step (a) and
brushing
C/S Error: 7. Even though the whole RD was done fully, there remained
on the case an undetected additional person or thing to which the pc was
PTS.
The rules of PTS are
A PERSON WHO ROLLER COASTERS IS ALWAYS PTS.
A PERSON WHO IS CHRONICALLY ILL ALWAYS IS PTS.
A PTS RUNDOWN THAT DOES NOT WORK HAS NOT BEEN DONE AS PER 1 TO 7 ABOVE.
The remedies to the above are
1. Do it.
2. Pgm it in correct sequence.
3. Set the case up properly so it is running well and past errors
handled.
4. Establish how well the person holds his gains before Pgming one. If
any Q at all, do the RD.
5. Cram the auditor on TRs, Metering, R3R drills and ruds. Do L4B, GF
Method 5 Handle, L3B on the pc and redo accordingly.
6. Complete the RD.
7. 2wc "What is your attention on?" to F/N. On PTS RD fly all ruds
single; L&N "On the PTS Rundown what being or thing was missed?"; R3R
Triple on it; fly all ruds and overts on it triple; if all not very
okay now 2wc "What other subject or people might have been overlooked
on the PTS RD?" Handle with R3R Triple and Ruds Triple plus overts.
A PTS RD always works. If it works with a relapse there is an error in
it as in the numbered paras above.
THIS IS VITAL TECH TO THE PC. IT MAKES THE MOST DIFFICULT CASES FLY
IF IT IS DONE RIGHT.
LRH:mes.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright �1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo
Franchise
Registrars IMPORTANT
BPI
Advance Mag
R6EW-OT III NO INTERFERENCE AREA
Note: (The following HCO B is broadly released despite the fact that
it contains technical terms and upper level tech programs. A person who is
taking this route has a right to know where he should go and where he
shouldn't.
The amount of improvement a person can receive is so great that it
takes a long series of actions to do it. As for "handling bad mental
conditions" this is too simple and is not the business we are in. Just by
handling the current upsets, problems, overts and withholds of a person in
an hour's session, Scientology can make more case advance than was possible
in any past century. So there is a vast difference between handling
disturbed people and obtaining all the advance of which a person is capable
of obtaining.
The data in this HCO B is issued to straighten out a current error
being made in routing some cases.)
A long series of tests and many case results have for some time
demonstrated that there is a NO INTERFERENCE AREA between R6EW and OT III.
A study of many cases and their results demonstrated conclusively that
one does NOT audit Dianetics or Lower Scientology Grades on a pre-clear or
pre-OT (Operating Thetan) AFTER he has begun Solo VI (the 1st Solo step) or
BEFORE he has reached OT III (a higher Solo step per grade chart).
Upsets of varying degree were found in ALL cases tampered with in the
NO INTERFERENCE AREA.
Repair actions to repair errors made by the Solo Auditor are all that
can be beneficially audited on a person between R6EW and OT III.
Even the powerful L10, when done between R6EW and OT III will fail.
Above and below the No Interference Area L10 is fantastically successful.
Nothing is superior to the Solo Grades.
THEREFORE, it is vital that a case be fully set up before beginning
actual Solo Auditing.
For information, the following list, taken from HCO B 8 Jan 72, Issue
II, is what constitutes a "set-up".
1. C/S Series 54 (former injuries, illnesses, etc., run out by
Dianetics) completed?
2. GF40XRR (Resistive Cases List) assessed? Engrams of it handled?
3. Dianetics Full Flow Table run? To Dn Completion?
4. Full Drug, Alcohol, medicine handling done?
5. Dianetics ran well? To End Phenomena?
6. All Grades run, single, triple or Expanded?
7. Green Form (case repair) items handled?
8. Attained End Phenomena of each grade?
9. Interiorization Rundown done? INT is okay?
10. C/S Series 53 (any abnormal Tone Arm positions) handled?
11. Power to End Phenomena. Single? Triple? Power Plus?
12. Tone Arm Range okay?
13. Power, no illness after?
14. Power, no ethics troubles after?
15. Success stories okay?
16. Director of Processing Interview okay? Pc not wanting something
handled?
17. Graph of Oxford Capacity Analysis Personality Test (or American
Personality Analysis Test) with no point below middle of graph?
A. Pc set up and okay to go to R6EW Solo?
B. Pc needs further set-up and repair before Solo?
The above is a checklist used by Solo Course Case Supervisors. (It is
NOT the program sequence by which the case is handled. This is given in the
Grade Chart.) These are the points checked.
Once onto Solo, whether these points are in or not, that's it, HANDS
OFF.
Once on Solo the pc is into the Non Interference Area. He may not have
Dianetics or Grades. He may only have the lists and repairs given to Solo
Auditors.
Of all these actions a full thorough drug-medicine-alcohol rundown is
the most important. People who have been on heavy drugs, pot, etc or who
have been alcoholics get things turned on in their banks and sometimes
become terrified of them and will not Solo. They are unable to confront
their pictures.
The remedy is to have a thorough drug-alcohol-medicine rundown.
The ONLY people who can't Solo are these poor devils who got onto these
psychiatric type drugs.
These can be handled by a competent drug rundown.
The ideal program appears on the Grade Chart, displayed in most orgs
and often sent out.
The chart has many symbols on it. A full glossary of these symbols and
terms exists in HCO B 20 Aug 71, Issue II, "Classification and Gradation
Chart, Abbreviations Explained", which should be posted alongside the
chart.
A fast summary of the steps would be
C/S 54 (handling illnesses, accidents, injuries)
Dianetics
ARC Straightwire
OBJECTIVE Processes
Grades 0-IV
POWER
POWER PLUS.
Into this program can be placed the engram handling GF40RR for resistive
cases, past practices, etc.
A Drug Rundown would occur in the area of Dianetics.
An Interiorization-Exteriorization Rundown would be given after the pc
exteriorized. This usually occurs early on in processing and has to be
handled.
A C/S 53 (for TA misbehavior) could be given anywhere.
The actual program run on the pc varies according to what the Case
Supervisor requires, but it follows the Grade Chart.
TEST
The Oxford Capacity Analysis (OCA) or the American Personality Analysis
(APA) is a graph which shows desirable and undesirable characteristics in a
case.
The points on the graph are moved up by processing. And Dianetics and
Scientology processes below R6EW are very capable of moving these points
into desirable range.
Above R6EW, the first Solo step, the graph can change but the person is
moving out of the normal range of humanity and the Solo grades are not
designed to change a human test graph and in fact these tests do not
measure the OT band of abilities.
The test graph should be in normal range before Solo is begun.
Auditing below Solo is quite capable of handling the graph points and
bringing them up to desirable range.
SOLO PROGRAM
The Ideal Solo Program is as follows:
1. Set-up done and all items on the checklist okay.
2. Good training as a Solo Auditor. Can include the Professional
Route of Class VI. Or the Social Counselor Course plus Solo. Or (at
this time) the Solo Course only. One Solo Audits as well as he is
trained and no better.
3. R6EW Solo Auditing to End Phenomena and attest.
4. Clearing Course Solo to CLEAR.
5. Operating Thetan I to attest.
6. Operating Thetan II to attest.
7. Operating Thetan III to attest.
8. Operating Thetan VII (audited by an auditor level) to attest.
9. OT III Expanded to attest.
10. OT IV.
11. OTV.
12. OT VI.
13. OT VIII as released.
After 7 above (OT III) or after 9 above (OT III Expanded) one can run
more Dianetics, Expanded Grades, GF40, the famous L10 or do any other case
action. One cannot profitably do these actions between Solo R6 and OT III.
That's just the way the bank is.
You will note that "OT VII" is apparently out of sequence. It originally
went OT III, OT IV, OT V, OT VI, OT VII. Then it was found that there was a
level OT III Expanded. So it can go OT III, OT VII, OT IIIX, OT IV, OT V,
OT VI or it can go OT III, OT IV, OT V, OT VI, OT VII, OT IIIX. One gets
the most out of it by taking VII after OT III and then OT IV, OT V and OT
VI really bite. Many persons were too nervous of OT III to do it well until
a drug rundown and OT VII were done. Others thought OT III was endless and
OT VII handled that.
The actual materials of these levels are held under tight security at
Advanced Orgs because when they are shown to persons who haven't moved up
the grades, they usually cave in. Thus the materials are only available in
Advanced Orgs.
AVAILABILITY
Auditing at levels below Power is available from field auditors,
Franchises and Scientology Orgs.
Power is available at Saint Hill Orgs in LA, Saint Hill UK, and
Denmark.
All Solo levels are only available at Advanced Organizations.
A person goes from Field Auditor to Franchise to Scientology Org to a
Saint Hill Org to an Advanced Org to obtain auditing of the whole Grade
Chart.
Going from Clear back to lower grades-or from an Advanced Org back to a
Franchise within the No Interference band-is liable to upset his case as it
is being run out of sequence. He could go to a Franchise or a Scientology
Org after OT III for Dianetics, Drug Rundown or other actions but not
between R6 and OT III.
Processing and the mind is a technical subject. In Dianetics and
Scientology, the answers have been found.
Like all technical material, you can't apply it poorly or backwards and
expect results.
I try-and very successfully in most cases-to hold the lines straight
and keep the materials purely and workably applied.
In the past year alone, fantastic tech advances have been made and are
available in terms of refined application within the existing framework of
the Grade Chart.
But the fundamentals do not change, the progress of the person up the
Grade Chart must be regular and on course. Otherwise he will not receive
full benefits.
It is my job to do all I can to make sure that full benefit is
received. This is not always easy to do on a rather aberrated planet. But
if it weren't so aberrated we wouldn't be here doing something about it.
Right?
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo
All Tech
Qual Terminals
FALSE TA ADDITION 2
Reference: HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA
HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition
C/S Series 53 HI-LO TA Assessment
Int Ext Correction List
There is an infinity of wrong ways to get a pc to read between 2.0 and
3.0 on an E-Meter.
One method would be to shoot him. Dead bodies read between 2.0 and 3.0.
Another way is to throw the trim knob off.
Yet another wrong way is to use HAND CREAM to make the TA go lower and
call "F/Ns" at 4.0 on an actual read.
An auditor who is not very expert is apt to find strange ways to do
things because the usual is beyond his skill.
A GOOD auditor handles low and high TAs with HCO B 24 Oct 71 and
Addition 12 Nov 71 and this HCO B "False TA", C/S Series 53 and the Hi-Lo
TA Assessment.
The commonest sources of high TA are PROTEST, OVERRUN and out
INTERIORIZATION RD and too big or too small cans.
The commonest sources of low TA are overwhelming auditor TRs or wet
sweaty hands.
The subject is not open to experimentation. If a pc's TA is low or high
and you don't correct it with the usual remedies mentioned above, the pc
goes into the soup.
GOOD AUDITORS KNOW THEIR TECH AND USE IT TO REMEDY HIGH AND LOW TAs.
GOOD AUDITORS DO HONEST WORKSHEETS AND HONEST AUDITING.
BE A GOOD AUDITOR.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo
All Tech
Terminals C/S Series 74
All Auditors
Franchise
TALKING THE TA DOWN MODIFIED
The expertise of talking the TA down should be preserved. It is a
skill.
But we have had high and low TAs solved for nearly a year and don't
have to talk them down anymore as a constant action.
Auditors SHOULD know how to do it, and then use it as a rare action.
The right way to handle a high TA is to:
Do HCO B 24 Oct 71, HCO B 12 Nov 71, HCO B 15 Feb 72, each named FALSE
TA if it has not been done by the auditor on the pc.
THEN if TA is high don't talk it down or do unusual solutions, do a C/S
Series 53 or a Hi-Lo TA Assessment and handle. The Int-Ext Correction List
is done as indicated and so is the Word Clearing Correction List.
As far as a C/S is concerned, when the pc's TA is seen to be high at
session start, he should order as follows: "Check as per False TA HCO Bs"
then when that is done he orders "C/S Series 53 Assess and return to me".
Or "Hi-Lo TA Assessment and return to me". He then rapidly C/Ses the
required actions.
He should have a standing order with all his auditors:
IF TA IS HIGH OR LOW
AT SESSION START DO
NOT CONTINUE THE
SESSION BUT SEND FOR
A C/S.
An auditor should not in fact talk a TA down, we know now, as he may be
auditing over an Out Interiorization Rundown, either not done or botched.
It therefore saves time if other auditing is not done when the TA is
high.
In general practice it will now be considered standard for an auditor,
Dianetic or upper class, to not start a session over a high TA but to call
for a C/S.
And where there is no C/S it will be considered standard for an
auditor, seeing a high TA, to at once do a C/S 53 Method 5 (assessing it
all), and then handling.
THERE ARE EXACT
REASONS FOR A TA
BEING HIGH AND
THESE TODAY ARE
EASILY HANDLED.
There is no need to talk a TA down. It is faster to directly locate the
reason it is up.
Smoothly handling such situations is the mark of an expert.
LRH:ne.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 FEBRUARY 1972
Issue I
Remimeo
FALSE TA ADDITION 3
(There are now four False TA HCO Bs including this one.
These were issued as more data was uncovered.)
HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA
HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition
HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2
and this one
HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3
A meter is a meter.
Meters are used to measure water, natural gas, and many other things.
An E meter is used to measure a pc.
If you rig a meter up so as to falsify its reads you get a wrong
result.
You could rig up a water meter so it read that twice as much water had
flowed and then sit around and wonder all week why the swimming pool never
filled up.
The ACCURACY of a meter depends upon its being honestly set up and
honestly used.
The HONESTY of the auditor determines his results.
The whole field of psychotherapy was dishonest from the days of witch
doctors to psychiatry. Falsified data came from lack of knowledge of the
mind. This made its practitioners DISHONEST.
We do not and must not follow that fatal road.
The technology we have WORKS to definite positive predictable results.
Results are obtained if the auditor has honestly studied and understood
his materials and honestly applies them.
Falsifying study leads to falsifying meters and this gives bad results
on pcs.
HONEST use of the materials and the meter gives an honest result.
One who does not know his materials and who cannot do his drills then
thinks he has to make a meter cheat.
HONEST use of the meter by an HONEST auditor is the route to GOOD
RESULTS.
LOW TAs
A bad practice has arisen to "beat" the low TA.
This is to have the pc wipe his hands every few minutes to get the TA up
above 2.0.
Not only does this distract the pc and yank him out of session, but it
is by inference putting his attention on the meter, a thing a good auditor
does NOT do in a formal session. The pc's attention must be on his own case
in a session, not on the meter or his hands.
An answer to low TA because of wet hands is foot plates.
But the best answer is to get the pc up scale so he doesn't have
perspiring hands.
Overwhelming TRs is the commonest reason for low TAs. Not all the hand
wiping in the world will cure poor TRs.
Some auditors "spook" (leap off the road like a horse frightened by
something blowing along) at the very thought of high or low TAs. This is
because they haven't got the TRs to handle a low TA nor the tech to handle
a high one.
Making a meter read falsely low with cream or falsely high with talcum
powder or wiping hands continually will not handle the pc's CASE.
That is what the auditor is there to do, not make his session look
good!
The funniest one I have ever heard was a Solo auditor who had high TA
trouble. So he used to fill up a bathtub with scalding water, fill the
bathroom full of clouds of steam and then sit in the bath, holding onto his
electrodes "Solo auditing".
It gave him a lower TA but it sure didn't give him any case result.
We maybe ought to have a contest as to who can come up with the most
comical actual instances of falsifying meter reads.
One "auditor" "solved it" by just calling F/Ns whenever she got tired
of the pc regardless of TA position. After a year or more of this she saw
the light and put herself in Ethics.
The funny part is that her co-auditor had been doing the same thing on
her!
HONEST TA IS THE BEST POLICY.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo (Revised 26 March 1972
All Supervisors Changes in this type style)
Student's Hat
HPCSC Word Clearing Series 32R
Mini Crse
Super Crse URGENT- IMPORTANT- URGENT
Word Clearing
Crse Vital for all Supervisors,
Est Off Crse Est-Os, and Cramming Officers
Dept 13 Personnel
WORD CLEARING METHOD 4
Tech and Admin Cramming Officers, Word Clearers and Course Supervisors
use Method 4 Word Clearing when fishing for a misunderstood word. E.g.
Cramming Officers use it to fish for misunderstood words concerning what
the person is being crammed on. Word Clearers use it on Interns when the
Intern needs a retrain or retread or even if the Intern is sent to
Cramming. Course Supervisors use it in the Classroom CONTINUOUSLY ON Non-
F/N STUDENTS or queries.
The whole idea is the person requiring the Method 4 Word Clearing has a
Cramming Order or is not an F/Ning student because of confusion as a result
of a misunderstood word, as per Word Clearing Series 16R or omitted
materials.
Method 4 fishes for the misunderstood word, finds it, clears it, looks
for another in the area until there are no more, at which point one should
get F/N VGIs, then moves to another area, handles that-eventually the
misunderstoods that resulted in the Cramming Order or non-F/N student are
handled.
It requires no C/S OK for it to be done. Method 1 is not a
prerequisite to Method 4.
E-Meter Drill No. 21 is the E-Meter Drill to be drilled on Method 4.
It's the method of fishing for a cognition.
Requires proper application of TRs and metering. All Supervisors, Est-
Os, and Dept 13 personnel to check out on, drill, and apply this tech AS
IT IS VITAL STUDY TECH.
METHOD 4 WORD CLEARING
1. Give person the cans, state, ''I am not auditing you. ''
2. Ask while watching the meter:
"Is there any part of what you're studying you did not fully get?''
Trace the read. Use "fishing for a cog'' drill (per HCO B 25 June 70,
Iss III) if needed.
If no read the question may be varied, e.g.
''Is there any part of the materials you're studying you disagree
with?''
or ''Is there any part of what you're studying you feel you could not
apply?''
or "In (material being checked) is there anything you didn't
understand?"
Let the student tell you briefly. Do NOT tell him the data.
Verify that his study Pack is complete as the data might have been
omitted. Also he might never have read the pack at all.
If the data was missing do not go on to Step 3. See that he gets the
complete pack and reads it Then repeat Method 4
I f the person just has not read the materials do not go on to 3 but
get him to read the materials. Then repeat Method 4.
3. Get what it is then ask:
''What word was misunderstood just before that?''
Meter reads, Word Clearer finds the word, never accepting a confusion
but finds the word giving the read (SF, F, LF, BD), gets it looked up in a
dictionary and used in sentences until it can be seen from the sentences
that the student now understands the word. This enables Method 4 to be done
on a high or low TA as the word found doesn't have to be taken to F/N, just
cleared to where it's obvious understanding has been attained on the word.
If you did get an F/N on clearing the word, that's fine; now look for
another.
4. Repeat 2 & 3 until the materials are fully cleared up and any and all
misunderstoods or confusions handled.
5. If the action bogs when used in the classroom the student must be
sent to Qual for handling and Supervisor to Cramming on TRs and
metering and drilling on this procedure.
The correct action is a WC CORRECTION LIST DONE ON THE STUDENT AND
HANDLED.
Of course if the above Question F/Ns on asking, there would be no
misunderstoods on the material being checked, but the person is in
Cramming, not an F/Ning student or whatever, so there obviously are
misunderstood words to be found and handled.
Look at HCO PL 16 Feb 72 "The Purpose of the Dept of Personnel
Enhancement". It says this Dept "reaches and looks for business all over
the org and brings it in". So someone with stats down-student or post
stats, confusion about what to do, overloaded, can't seem to handle it, how
do you do this, etc, etc, are all indicators of misunderstood words as the
person is saying confusion, confusion. Well, underneath the confusion is a
misunderstood word just as Word Clearing 16R says.
Method 4 Word Clearing is what is used in doing and achieving the
purpose of the Dept of Personnel Enhancement, HCO PL 16 Feb 72.
One of the ways the Word Clearers in this Dept do the job is using
Method 4 Word Clearing.
METHOD 4 IS USED BY COURSE SUPERVISORS TO HANDLE ALL STUDENT QUERIES
ABOUT CONTENTS OF COURSE MATERIALS.
The reason students ask questions about "What is meant'' is because of
omitted pack materials from their checksheet, failure to read what they
have OR BECAUSE OF A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD JUST BEFORE THEY GOT CONFUSED.
The Super has to know only where the materials are and BE SMART ENOUGH
TO DO METHOD 4 INSTEAD OF GlVING THE STUDENT ALTER-ISED ANSWERS THAT STOP
SCIENTOLOGY WORKING.
Word Clearing, especially Method 4, is how to get in HIGH CRIME HCO PL
7 Feb 1965, Reissued 15 June 70, "KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING''
SUCCESSFUL COURSE SUPERVISION AND SUCCESSFUL CRAMMING REQUIRE THIS
ACTION BE FULLY KNOWN AND U - S - E - D.
**K *E *E *P**
**S *C *l *E *N * T*O *L *O *G * Y**
**W *O *R *K *l *N *G**
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.bh
Copyright �1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo
Div 6 Personnel
Tech Personnel C/S Series 71A
Qual Personnel
WORD CLEARING OCAs
An illegal practice has been uncovered in which the words on the Oxford
Capacity Analysis, American Personality Analysis and other tests have been
word cleared by testers and Directors of Processing.
Example: Pc does an OCA (or any test) that shows a state of case in
July. He gets auditing. He takes another test that shows what the auditing
did by August. If somewhere along this line a test I/C or D of P word
clears him on the test, the test-will change. Entering this variable wipes
out any possibility of establishing what the auditing did for the case.
Example: If a child is measured as to height and then fed certain foods
to see if he will grow and then someone changes or stretches the tape by
which he was measured, you can't find out if the food did any good.
In science this is known as holding a constant.
We don't give a hoot in hell if the pc understands the test or not. The
next time he takes it he'll probably have the same misunderstoods but he'll
have a change of opinion or even have a new cleverness or better memory and
the test will change.
Therefore none of these things may ever be done:
1. Never tell the pc the right answers to a test.
2. Never tell a pc to look up words on a test he doesn't
understand.
3. Never word clear the question sheet for a pc on any test.
4. Never answer a pc's question as to what a question means.
DO THESE THINGS
A. Be sure any test person grasps this HCO B fully so he knows what a
test is and why we test people.
B. Never let a person who falsely reports routinely near a test line.
C. Safeguard test answer sheets from being known or seen by unauthorized
personnel.
D. Use 2nd test and 3rd test question sheets, each different from the
1st one. (Tests are issued this way.)
E. Give other tests (Aptitude or OTIS etc) to compare with the second or
third OCA or APA if it is in doubt to see if the OCA has been "word
cleared" or falsified.
F. Groove in Examiners: Give a meter check on ALL ATTESTS at the
Examiner. "Do you have any doubts or reservations concerning attesting
to (whatever the attest is) ?" Note any INSTANT read (a latent surge
can occur as a protest). This
question is asked before the question asking him if he wants to attest.
E.g. "Do you have any doubts or reservations concerning attesting to
Word Clearing Method I complete?" No instant read. Then ask the attest
question "Would you like to attest to______?"
Never let an Examiner permit any attest or pass to even be asked for
if the meter tone arm is high or low or not F/Ning. If an INSTANT read
is gotten on the first question above, the Examiner does not ask the
second question, and sends the folder back to the C/S.
G. Require a meter check at Success with the TA position and needle
behavior noted on the Success form. Those with high or low TA and/or
not F/Ning are not valid success stories. The success person makes the
meter check after the story is written, notes it without pc seeing it
and smiles and acks. He does not refuse the story as it will ARC Break
the pc. But he must call it to the attention of the Dist Sec and Qual
Sec that a false attestation and poor result came from Div IV and it
must be taken off Div IV's stat.
H. Both Examiner and Success must know of the False TA HCO Bs so they
don't put the pc on wrong cans or use cans when the auditor used
footplates.
This safeguards our test line.
The test line is a check on C/S and auditing quality. We are not trying
to find out if Dianetics and Scientology work. We know that. We are trying
to find out by test, Examiner and Success if it is being properly taught
and applied in Div IV and Dept of Pers Enhancement.
HONESTY is a primary requirement on test lines. PR types that falsify
to attain status or seem good fellows need not apply for these posts and
shouldn't be on them.
THE PC OR STUDENT DEEP DOWN KNOWS WHETHER HE HAS MADE IT OR NOT.
If you or tests tell him he's made it when he hasn't he will get a
false opinion of you and doubt you.
If you tell him he hasn't made it when he has he will get a false
opinion of you.
He will think you don't know your business and blow.
SANITY is basically HONESTY and TRUTH.
When false data or altered data is entered this is ABERRATION.
So be honest and run a sane D of P, Examiner, Success and TEST line.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 FEBRUARY 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 15R
(Cancels HCO B 21 Aug 71, the original
WC Series 15 by a Testing personnel)
Reference HCO B 19 Dec 71, C/S Series 71,
"D of P Operates by OCAs"
HCO B 24 Feb 72, C/S Series 71
Additional
WORD CLEARING ANY WORDS ON ANY TEST AT ANY TIME IS A HIGH CRIME.
It suppresses tech results and obscures them.
The whole of HCO B 24 Feb 72, C/S Series 71A, explains fully why one
never word clears tests or even tells a person being tested to use a
dictionary.
FOREIGN LANGUAGE PERSONS
When testing persons who speak a different language than that in which
the test is written, GET A TRANSLATED TEST INTO THEIR LANGUAGE OR TRANSLATE
THE TEST WITHOUT ANY WORD CLEARING.
MIS Us ON TESTS
Where a person has a misunderstood word on a test, it usually remains
misunderstood on the second test. Thus the test remains VALID as nothing
has changed in it.
If the person's IQ rises during processing he may very well also figure
out the misunderstood word now on the second test and improve the graph.
But that is a valid PROCESSING result, not a false one introduced by
clearing test words.
SUMMARY
Auditing works when properly done and it does not need a side action of
word clearing a test to better the graph.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
LRH MODEL AUDITING TAPES
26 February 1972
"These tapes were made to be used. They are practical demonstrations of
real live TRs.
"Some orgs have their own ideas about TRs, consider TRs as demonstrated
in these tapes to be 'old-we don't do it that way any more' and have
substituted their own versions such as a rote TR-4 'Thank you I'll repeat
the auditing command.' 'Thank you I'll repeat the auditing command.'
"That is NOT TR-4.
"The TRs are exactly as given in HCO B 16 Aug 1971, Issue II, 'Training
Drills Modernized' [Vol. VII-348]. PAB 151 'Handling Originations' [Vol.
III -370] further amplifies this, clearly points out that TR-4 is NOT a
rote command, and gives examples of its correct use. The LRH Model Auditing
Tapes are models of the correct use of TRs. They are not open to
interpretation by supervisors. Any opinion that they are the 'old' way of
doing TRs and not to be used in modern auditing comes under the heading of
Technical Degrade and is an ethics offense.
"Poor TRs throw pcs out of session, cause student blows from courses,
bring about ARC Breaks and an inability to handle people and situations in
life. TRs are therefore a most vital and basic skill.
"They can be mastered but only by an honest study of the TRs HCO B,
getting all misunderstood words on the HCO B cleared, listening to the LRH
Model Auditing tapes without one's own preconceived ideas of what TRs
should sound like and without interpretation by others, and then by a very
honest drilling of each TR from Zero on up.
"Only those auditors or students who glossed over TRs 0-3 without
mastering them would ever demand or expect a rote command to be substituted
for real TR-4.
"It's all in the HCO B and correctly demonstrated in the LRH Model
Auditing tapes. So how about getting them read, listened to and applied and
watch the resulting upsurge in personnel effectiveness and soaring student
and auditing stats!"
L. RON HUBBARD
"Honest TRs"
LRH ED 180 Int
3 September 1972
** 7202C26 LRH/MTS-1 CCH: Steps 1-4 Demo [5707C07 FC-15]
** 7202C26 LRH/MTS-2 Demo of an Assist [5911C09 1MACC-2]
* * 7202C26 L R H/MTS-3 Patching Up Two 3 DXX Cases
[6205C16 SH TVD-5 A&B]
** 7202C26 LRH/MTS-4 Check on "What" Questions and Havingness Probe
[6205C23 SH TVD-6]
** 7202C26 LRH/MTS-5 Fish and Fumble-Checking Dirty Needles
[6205C23 SH TVD-7]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 FEBRUARY 1972R
REVISED 23 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo
All Levels
All Auditors
All Tech Checksheets
FALSE TA CHECKLIST
Ref: HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA
HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition
HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2
HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3
HCO B 24 Jan 73 Examiner and False TA
HCO B 24 Nov 73 C/S 53RF
HCO B 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands
Make False TA
The following are the items to be checked by an auditor on any pc. It
need only be done once unless the check itself is suspected false, or if
conditions of the pc's hands, etc change.
The checklist is kept in the pc folder and is entered on the folder
summary as an action done.
The value of operating with correct can size should not be
underestimated, the reference HCO Bs state why.
The auditor signs and answers the following points on the checklist,
and gets answers from the pc where needed.
_________
R-Factor to pc: "We are going to check the cans and adjust them to get
the best accuracy."
1. Is the meter charged fully? _________
2. Is the meter trimmed correctly? _________
3. Are the leads connected to the meter and cans? _________
4. Are the cans rusty? _________
5. Are pc's hands excessively dry requiring vanishing cream?
_________
6. Are the pc's hands excessively wet requiring powder? _________
7. The pc is NOT being told continually to wipe his hands?
_________
8. The pc's grip on the cans is NOT being continually checked by the
auditor in a way that interrupts the pc? _________
9. TA position on large cans? _________
Size approx 4 7/8 inches by 2 5/8 inches or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm
10. TA position on medium cans? _________
Size approx 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 cm by 5 cm
11. TA position on small cans? _________
Size approx 2 inches by 1 3/16 inches or 5 cm by 3 cm
12. Are the cans too large for pc? _________
13. Are the cans too small for pc? _________
14. Are the cans just right in size? _________
15. Are the cans cold? _________
16. Are the pc's hands dry or calloused? _________
17. Does the pc have arthritic hands? _________
18. TA position on foot plates? _________
(Foot plates are used and TA checked on them when the answer to
16 & 17 is affirmative.)
19. Are the pc's feet calloused or excessively wet or dry? _________
20. Does the pc loosen his grip on the cans? _________
21. Check the pc's grip, does he hold the cans correctly? (See E-Meter
Drill 5.) _________
22. Is the pc hot? _________
22a. Is the pc well slept? _________
23. Is the pc cold? _________
23a. Is the pc hungry? _________
24. Is it too late at night? _________
25. Is auditing being done not in the pc's normal regular awake hours?
_________
26. Are there rings on the pc's hands? _________
27. Is the pc wearing tight shoes? _________
28. Is the pc wearing tight clothes? _________
29. Is it actually chronic High or Low TA case condition? _________
30. Has the pc gone into despair over his TA? _________
The handling of these points is stated in the reference HCO Bs.
The handling of high or low TA after checking these points is by C/S
53RF, Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S.
The way to be sure of a C/S 53RF or Hi-Lo TA list is by continued
assessment and handling of these lists until an F/N on assessment is
gotten.
So standard tech handles the high and low TA. The C/S Series gives more
data on the subject.
Compiled by Flag XIIs
for
Training & Services Bureau
LRH:BL:JW:clb.rd
Copyright �1972, 1973 Revised by
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES LECTURES
Flagship Apollo
1-6 March 1972
** 7203C01 ESTO-1 Estos Instant Hat, Part I
** 7203C01 ESTO-2 Estos Instant Hat, Part II
** 7203C02 ESTO-3 Evaluation and Handling of Personnel, Part I
** 7203C02 ESTO-4 Evaluation and Handling of Personnel, Part II
** 7203C03 ESTO-5 Handling Personnel, Part I
** 7203C03 ESTO-6 Handling Personnel, Part II
** 7203C04 ESTO-7 Hold the Form of the Org, Part I
** 7203C04 ESTO-8 Hold the Form of the Org, Part II
** 7203C05 ESTO-9 Revision of the Product/Org System, Part I
** 7203C05 ESTO-10 Revision of the Product/Org System, Part II
** 7203C06 ESTO-11 F/Ning Staff Members, Part I
** 7203C06 ESTO-12 F/Ning Staff Members, Part II
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 13 MARCH 1972
Remimeo
Establishment Officer Series 5
PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT
ORDERS AND PRODUCTS
The situation one often finds in an org, after one has, to some degree,
conquered Dev-T, is that PEOPLE REQUIRE ORDERS.
For years I wondered why this was so. Well, I found it.
WHEN PEOPLE DO NOT CLEARLY KNOW WHAT THEIR PRODUCTS ARE THEY REQUIRE
CONSTANT ORDERS.
To the Establishment Officer, this reflects most visibly in trying to
get Program targets DONE.
Some people have to be ordered and ordered and ordered and threatened
and howled at. Then, in a bewildered way, they do a target, sometimes half,
sometimes nearly all.
Behind this apparent blankness lies an omitted datum. When they're like
that they don't know what their product is or what it adds up to. Or they
think it's something else or should be.
That blankness can invite overts.
It is very seldom that malice or resentment or refusal to work lies
behind the inaction. People are seldom that way.
They usually just don't understand what's wanted or why.
Because they don't know what a PRODUCT is!
A whole Ad Council of a downstat org was unable even to define the
word.
They had required orders, orders, orders and even then didn't carry
them out.
HAT SURVEY FOR ORDERS
A staff member who requires orders may also think that any order is a
policy and lasts forever. If you look into hats you will even find casual
"close the door" type of orders, given on one occasion to fit one
circumstance, are converted over into STANDING (continual) ORDERS that
forever keep a certain door closed.
An Est O surveying the hats of a unit may very well find all manner of
such oddities.
It is a standard Est O action to survey hats.
In hats you will find despatches giving specific orders or quoted
remarks preserved instead of notes on what one has to know to produce a
product.
In auditors' hats, directions for 1 specific pc in 1960, never
published and from no tape or correct source, held onto like death like it
was to be applied to every pc in the world!
A dishwashing hat may have orders in it but not how to wash dishes
rapidly and well.
This is all a symptom of a unit or activity that does not know what its
products are.
DISESTABLISHMENT
Where you find lots of orders kicking around, you will also find
disestablishment by by-pass, command channels not held and staff members
like to take their orders from anyone but those in authority-any passerby
could give them orders.
This is rampant where an executive has not been well on post.
By counting such orders up and seeing who they are from one can
determine the unhattedness of staff, their org bd weaknesses and
principally their lack of knowledge of their products.
HATTING FOR PRODUCT
If an Est O is to hat so as to get the staff member to get his product
out, then the Est O has to know how to clear up "products".
Now an Est O is an Establishment Officer? There are product officers.
The Product of an Est O is the Establishment. Then what is he doing with
Products?
Well, if he doesn't hat so staff members get out Products then the org
will be a turmoil, unhappy and downstat.
Production is the basis of morale.
Hattedness is a basic of 3rd Dynamic sanity.
But if you don't HAT SO AS TO GET THE STAFF MEMBER YOU ARE HATTING
PRODUCING YOU WILL HAT AND HAT AND IT WILL ALL BE IN VAIN. The person won't
stay hatted unless he is hatted so as to be able to produce.
The Product Officer should be working to get the products out.
So if you don't hat for the product then the staff member will be tom
between two sets of orders, the Est O's and the Product Officer's.
Only when you hat to get product will you get agreement with product
officers.
If you are in disagreement with product officers, then the Est O is not
hatting to get production.
RIGHT WAY TO
There is a right direction to hat. All others are incorrect.
1. CLEAR UP WHAT THE PRODUCT IS FOR THE POST. AND HAT FROM THERE.
2. HAT FROM THE TOP OF THE DIVISION (OR ORG) DOWN.
These are the two right directions.
All other directions are wrong.
These two data are so important that the failure of an Est O can often
be traced to violation of them.
You can have a senior Exec going almost livid, resisting being hatted
unless you hat by 1st establishing what the product is. If PRODUCT is first
addressed and cleaned up then you can also hat from the top down.
If this is not done, the staff will not know where they are going or
why and you will get silly unusual situations like "A11 right. So you're
the Establishment Officer. Well, I give up. The division can have 2l/2
hours a day Establishment time and then get the hell out of here so some
work can be done . . . !" "Man, you got these people all tied up, stats are
down! Can't you understand ...."
Well, if you don't do one and two above you'll run into the most
unusual messes and "solutions" you ever heard of, go sailing off policy and
as an Est O wind up at your desk doing Admin instead of getting your job
done in the Division. And an Est O who is not on his feet working in the
Division is worth very little to anyone.
So see where the basic errors lead and
Hat on Product before doing anything else and
Hat from the top down.
STEPS TO CLEAR "PRODUCT"
This is a general rundown of the sequence by which Product is cleared
and re-cleared and re-cleared again.
This can be checklisted for any Exec or staff member and should be with
name and date and kept in the person's "Est O file folder" for eventual
handing to his new Est O when the person is transferred out of the division
or in Personnel Files if he goes elsewhere.
1. Clear the word PRODUCT.
2. Get what the Product or Products of the post should be. Get it or any
number of products he has fully fully stated, not brushed off.
3. Clear up the subject of Exchange. (See HCO PL 27 Nov 71 Exec Series 3
and HCO PL 3 Dec 71 Exec Series 4.)
4. Exchange of the product Internal in the org. For what valuable?
5. Exchange External of the valuable with another group or public. For
what valuable? (Person must come to F/N VGIs on these above actions
before proceeding or he goes to an auditor to get his mis Us and out
ruds very fully handled.)
6. Does he want the product? Clean this up fully to F/N VGIs or yourself
get E/S to F/N or get an auditor to unsnarl this.
7. Can he get the products (in 2 above) out? How will he? What's he need
to know? Get him fully settled on this point.
8. Will it be in volume? What volume? Is that enough to bother with or
will it have to be a greater volume? Or is he being optimistic? What's
real? What's viable?
9. What quality is necessary? What would he have to do to attain that?
To attain it in volume?
10. Can he get others to want the product or products (as in 2 above)?
What would he have to do to do this?
11. How do his products fit into the unit or section or department or
division or the org? Get this all traced.
12. Now trace the blocks or barriers he may believe are on this line. Get
what HE can do about these.
13. What does he have to have to get his product out? (Alert for
unreasonable have to have before he can do blocks.)
14. Now does he feel he can get his product or products out?
Signature of Est O or Clearer.
NOW he really can be hatted.
________
BRUSH-OFF
Quickie handling is a very very bad fault. "Quickie" means a brush-off
"lick and a promise" like wiping the windshield on the driver's side when
really one would have to work at it to get a whole clean car.
So don't "quickie" Product. If this is poorly done on them there goes
the old balloon. Hatting won't be possible.
Orders will have to be poured in on this terminal. Dev-T will generate.
Overt products will occur, not good ones. And it won't be worthwhile.
DISAGREEMENT
There can be a lot of disagreement amongst Product Officers and Est Os
on what products are to be hammered out.
In such a case, or in any case, one can get a Disagreements Check done
in Dept of Personnel Enhancement (who should look up how to do one).
This is a somewhat extreme way to settle an argument and should only be
a "when all else fails".
It is best to take the whole product pattern of the org apart with the
person, STARTING FROM THE BIGGEST PRODUCT OF THE ORG AND WORKING BACK TO
THE PERSON'S PRODUCT.
Almost always there will be an outpoint in reasoning.
An Exec who only wants GI can be a trial as he is violating EXCHANGE.
As an org is paid usually before it delivers, it is easy to get the org in
trouble by backlogs or bad repute for non-delivery. An org that has credit
payments due it that aren't paid maybe didn't deliver. But Div III may
soften up collections for some reason like that and then where would the
org be?
Vol 0 of the OEC Course gives an excellent background of how a basic
org works. As one goes to higher orgs, lower orgs are depended upon to
continue to flow upward to them. (See HCO PL 9 Mar 72, Issue I, Finance
Series 11, "Income Flows and Pools".)
A study of Vol 0 OEC and a full understanding of its basic flows and
adapting these to higher orgs will unsnarl a lot of odd ideas about
Product.
The Est O has to be very clear on these points or he could mis-hat a
person.
Usually however this is very obvious.
PRODUCT OFFICERS
Heads of Orgs and divisions have had to organize so long they get stuck
in it.
They will try to order the Est O.
This comes about because they do not know their products or the Est O
is not following 1 and 2 above and does not know his own product.
The Product Officer may try to treat the Est O as a sort of "organizing
officer" or a "program officer" if
A. The Est O is not hatting to get production.
B. The Product Officer is not cleared on Product.
So it comes back to the 1 and 2 first mentioned.
You can look over it now and see that if one is not doing these two
things, Dev-T, non-viability and orders will occur.
So where you have Dev-T, down stats and orders flying around you know
one thing that will resolve it:
SOMETHING WILL HAVE TO BE IRONED OUT ABOUT PRODUCT.
When it all looks impossible, go to this point and get to work on 1 &
2.
LRH:ne.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO PL is modified by HCO PL 9 May 1974, Prod-Org, Esto and Older
Systems Reconciled, which is in the Management Series 1970-1974, page 438.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 MARCH 1972
Issue V
Remimeo
Cse Supers
Cse Super
Checksheets HIGH CRIME
LRH Comm to
Enforce
WHAT IS A COURSE
HIGH CRIME
The amendment HCO PL 26 Jan 72 What is a Course PL is CANCELED.
The Original WHAT IS A COURSE PL, HCOPL 16 Mar 71, is restored AS
WRITTEN.
The added script line in the 26 Jan 72 revision is canceled as not
written by myself and is a false datum.
The incorrect line states ''to be on the ball one should be oneself
fully trained on the level one is supervising. It is by far preferable to
be a Class VIII with full grasp of Standard Tech.''
This is an alter-is of Study Tech.
Careful investigation has found that WHEN SUPERVISORS FAIL THEY FAIL
BECAUSE OF IGNORANCE OF SCN STUDY TECH AND FAILURE TO USE IT.
In Course Supervision it is OUT TECH to fail to know and USE Study
Tech.
If an auditor were to say, "I have to know all about minds but I don't
have to know anything about TRs, Meters or processes," you would think he
was as crazy as a psychiatrist !
He would become so involved with the figure-figure of the patient he
WOULD NOT KNOW HOW TO HANDLE HIM.
A Super who does not know or use Study Tech as a tech and does not
heavily apply it to get the student through is an OUT TECH Super.
The real WHY of any failed or blowing students or students who cannot
or do not apply the data is
WHY: THE COURSE SUPERVISOR DOES NOT KNOW OR USE STUDY TECH BUT THINKS
HE HAS TO KNOW THE SUBJECT TAUGHT SO HE CAN TEACH IT.
Example: A Course Super standing staring at his Class. One half his
students not using demo kits, one student listening to a tape and reading
an HCO B at the same time but doping off, one third of the students boiling
off. Challenged about this states, "But I don't know the materials they are
studying."
If a railway engineer were to say, "I have to know all the tech of
building a railroad and not how to run this train," you'd think he was
batty.
If a housewife said, "I can't run my house because I have never taken a
course on how to run my husband's business," you'd think she was crazy.
A Course Super who does not respect, know and USE Study Tech on his
students is guilty of practicing OUT TECH.
If an auditor did not know how to start and stop a session, how to read
a meter, his TRs, his processes or handle a session he would have nothing
but failed preclears.
IN THE SAME FRAME OF REFERENCE, A COURSE SUPER WHO DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO
START AND STOP A STUDENT, CLEAR WORDS, ENFORCE DEMOS AND DOES NOT GET STUDY
TECH APPLIED CONTINUALLY WILL HAVE FAILED STUDENTS.
A Course Super's primary tech is Study Tech and its application to a
student. If he can keep that student on the rails and F/Nng and rapidly
covering his materials he is doing the WHOLE JOB OF SUPERVISING.
It is therefore a High Crime for a person to Supervise a Course who
does not know, apply and continually use his Study Tech on every individual
student.
It is also a HIGH CRIME for a Director of Training or a Tech Sec or an
Est O to have anyone supervising without FULL USE OF STUDY TECH.
Just as it's a HIGH CRIME to continue to use HGC auditors who smash up
pcs through non-use of Auditing Tech, it is a HIGH CRIME to continue to use
Course Supervisors who do not know that Study Tech exists, that it is a
tech and that it is the "tools of his trade" and who does not use it and
thus smashes up students.
The society knows nothing about Study Tech. It thinks a teacher
"teaches the subject and must know the subject!" Thus it alter-ises the
subject, almost never makes a competent person and routine school teaching
is looked upon by Industry as a huge failure. All manner of unusual
solutions are in progress in every country to remedy this inability of
students to learn.
WE MUST NOT CONTINUE TO INHERIT THE IDIOCY THAT A TEACHER ONLY HAS TO
KNOW THE SUBJECT AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT STUDY TECH.
It is Study Tech that gets the student of any subject through.
The thing that breaks the Super down is ignorance of just ONE point:
A STUDENT WITH A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD WILL POUR OUT A TORRENT OF QUERIES
ABOUT THE SUBJECT!
The Super is a complete ignorant fool if he answers one of these
questions. The Super's knowledge of the subject is not what is needed! If
the Super knew and practiced Misunderstood Word tech he'd know that student
has misunderstood words and he would find and handle. HE WOULD NOT ANSWER
OR EVEN TRY TO ANSWER THOSE QUERIES. It would do NO good if he did. This
query-happy student has passed by a Mis-U word !
Such a student can get misemotional. He is upset. He thinks data is
being denied him. He wants to blow.
What kind of a Super is it that doesn't grab a meter and find the word?
An SP? Or What?
Just like an "auditor" is not an auditor who lets pcs blow without
handling so is a Super no Super at all who cannot handle a student with
Study Tech.
So let's knock off the wog world inheritance and get on the ball and
REALIZE STUDY TECH IS THE TECH A SUPER KNOWS AND USES.
Just because a Super was himself mistaught by old Mrs. Zilch in the third
grade- who knew arithmetic but not how to teach a subject-is no reason he
has to go on laying an egg in a Scientology classroom.
A Course Super is a technician, a specialist in Study Tech.
And just to help it out, IT IS A HIGH CRIME TO FAIL TO USE STUDY TECH
IN A CLASSROOM.
Any time a student blows or later fails to be able to apply his data,
the Super who taught him will be Comm Eved for OUT TECH.
We must have no blows and no failures.
The product of a Super is a Graduate from his course who knows and can
successfully apply the subject that was taught.
This is his true stat. Points measure only quantity. The record of the
individual student measures quality. The Exchange value of the student
after a course (not his fee) measures viability.
It may be a crazy planet. Course Supers don't have to teach crazy
courses where Study Tech is not used.
WHAT IS A COURSE is answered by one where the elements of the original
HCO PL 16 Mar 71 are in use AND:
Where Study Tech is in full and continual application to every student
in that course!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 MARCH 1972
Remimeo
Establishment Officer Series 11
FULL PRODUCT CLEARING
LONG FORM
(Reference HCO P/L 13 Mar 72
Est O Series No. 5)
MUST BE DONE ON AN EST O
BEFORE HE DOES IT ON STAFF.
If you ask some people what their product is, you usually get a
DOINGNESS.
There are three conditions of existence. They are BE, DO and HAVE.
All products fall under HAVE.
The oddities you will get instead of a proper product are many.
Thus it is possible to "clear products" without any real result.
PRODUCT CLEARING FORM
_____________________ _____________________
Org Person's Name
_____________________
Date
_____________________
Post
The 14 Points of Est O Series 5 are done in this fashion, with a meter
used to check words.
STEP ONE
DO NOT TAKE FOR GRANTED THAT THE PERSON KNOWS WHAT "PRODUCT" MEANS. GET
IT AND EVERY WORD IN THE DEFINITION LOOKED UP.
(a) Clear the Word PRODUCT. Dictionaries give a variety of definitions.
Make sure you get a useable definition that the person understands AND
WHICH HE UNDERSTANDS ALL THE WORDS IN. He can be hung up on "that" or
"is" in the definition itself believe it or not.
(b) Have the person USE the word PRODUCT 10 times in sentences of his own
invention and use it correctly each time.
(c) Now clear up BE, DO, HAVE, the Conditions of Existence. People often
think a BE is a product or a DO. It is always something someone can
HAVE.
Clear the words BE, DO, HAVE by dictionary, especially HAVE.
(d) Write these on a sheet of paper
BE
DO
HAVE.
Tell the person to name a product out in the world (a car, a book, a
cured dog, etc).
Put an arrow into the word DO if he gives you a "do", into BE if he
gives you a "be" instead of a HAVE.
Mark HAVE with an arrow each time he gives a right HAVE product.
When he can rapidly name a product that is something that one can
HAVE, without a comm lag, go on to next step.
(e) Clear up this question on a meter Method 4 (see HCO B 22 Feb 72, Word
Clearing Series 32, "Word Clearing Method 4"):
"Have I used any word so far you did not understand?"
Get it clean.
(f) Now give the person a copy of HCO P/L 29 October 70 Org Series 10.
Have him read the policy letter.
(g) Clear by Method 4 Word Clearing this question:
"Are there any words in the policy letter you did not understand?"
Get it cleaned up. If there were any, have him reread the policy
letter until he says he has it.
(h) Drill the pc on Products 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Write:
Product 1 Product 2
Product 3 Product 4
on a sheet of paper.
Let him retain and consult the HCO P/L 29 Oct 70 Org Series 10.
Put the point of your pen on one of the products (Product 1 or 2 or 3
or 4) and say, "Name a Product 1." "Name a Product 3." "Name a Product
4." "Name a Product 2." Do this until pc has it.
Now take the P/L away from him and repeat the drill.
When your Product 1, etc is all blacked up with ball-point spots and
the person is quick at it, thank him. Tell him he has it and go on to
next step.
STEP TWO
(a) Look up the hat and org board of the post of the person being product
cleared and get some idea of what the post's product would have to be
to fit in with the rest of the scene. It won't necessarily be in former
hat write-ups. What the post produces must be worked out. Write down
what it possibly may be.
(b) Get the person to tell you what his post produces. Have him work the
wording around until it is totally satisfactory to him and is not
incorrect by Step 2 (a).
Be very careful indeed that you don't get a wrong product or you
could throw the whole line-up of the org out.
Beware of "a high stat" or "a bonus" or "GI" as these are items
received in Exchange, not the person's produced product.
Once more resort to BE
DO
HAVE
to be sure he is not giving a doingness. And point this out until he
actually has a HAVE.
Write down the product on the worksheet.
(c) Ask if there are any more products to the post. If the person
is wearing several hats, he would have a product for each hat. List
each hat and get the product of each hat written after it.
(d) Now take the principal product of the post and see if it is really
three products of different degrees or kinds. (Example: an auditor has
[A] A well pc [one who has been gotten over a psychosomatic illness]
[B] A person who is physically active and well and will continue to be
well, and [C] A being with greatly increased abilities. A Super has [A]
A trained student, [B] A Course graduate, [C] A person who successfully
applies the skills taught.) (Note: The above are rough wordings.)
The A, B, C you will notice fit roughly into (A) BE, (B) DO, (C)
HAVE.
If the person has trouble with this, write BE, DO, HAVE on the
worksheet.
(e) Find out if the person has had these confused one with another or if
he is trying for A when his product was C, or any other mix-up.
See if he has to first get a BE, then a DO to finally achieve a HAVE.
When he has all this straight he should cognite on what product he is
going for on his post, with VGIs.
(f) Tell the person that's it for the step and verify the products with a
Product Officer. (Be sure it's a Product Officer who has had his
Product Clearing. If this is THE Product Officer of the org, see if it
compares to the Valuable Final Products of an Org [see HCO P/L 8 Nov
73RA, revised 9 Mar 74, "The VFPs and GDSs of the Divisions of an
Org''] .) If the products are not all right check the person on a Meter
for Mis Us and do steps 1 and 2 again. If okay, proceed to Step 3.
STEP THREE
(a) Give the person HCO P/L 27 Nov 71, Executive Series No. 3 and HCO P/L
3 Dec 71 Executive Series 4. Have him read them.
(b) Return and do Method 4 on the P/Ls and clean up any Misunderstood
Word. If these are found and looked up and used, then have the person
read the P/Ls again.
(c) Now that the person has it, exchange objects with him. Have him now
explain exchange until he sees clearly what it is.
STEP FOUR
(a) Now write his product on the left-hand side of your worksheet and
draw an arrow from it to the right:
His Product ------------------------>
And one to the left below it <------------------------
Have him tell you what, internally in the org, he could get in
exchange for producing his product and getting it out.
Have him clear up why he might not get that.
(b) Have him look at a worksheet picture:
Overt Act-------------------> Injury
Injury <---------------------- Overt Act
SELF No Product-----------------> OTHERS
Nothing <------------------- Nothing
as a cycle. Be sure he grasps that.
(c) Have him look at a worksheet picture:
Overt Product --------------------> Upset
Upset <------------------------------ Overt
And have him grasp that cycle.
(d) Now have him draw various such cycles having to do with the products
he has been getting out. Such as:
Bad product ----------------> Dissatisfied
Bad feelings <--------------- Ethics
But using various versions of products.
Do this until he has it untangled and feels good.
(e) Have him write down his product on the left, arrow to the right, what
comes back on the right and what occurs on the left.
If he has this now, tell him that's fine.
STEP FIVE
(All in Big Clay Demos)
(a) Have him work out what theft is in terms of Exchange, and arrows.
(b) Have him show how his product contributes to the org's product.
(c) Have him work out how the org's product as relates to his division is
then exchanged with society outside the org and Scn and what society
exchanges back to the org.
(d) Have him work out how his product contributes to org's product
outward and outside the org and Scn and then from the society outside
back to the org and org back to him.
This may have more than two vias each way.
(e) Have him work out the combined staff products into an org product and
then out into the society and then the exchange back into the org and
to CLOs and upper management and to org staff.
(f) When the Demos are all okay and BIG tell him that's fine and go on to
next step.
STEP SIX
(Metered)
(a) Find out if person wants his product? (not the Exchange).
If not find out who might suppress it? and E/S times.
Who might invalidate it? and earlier times.
2wc it to F/N Cog VGIs.
(b) Establish now if the person wants his product.
(If bogs turn over to a C/S and auditor for ruds and completion.)
STEP SEVEN
(Metered)
(a) Can the person get his product out?
(b) Handle by 2wc E/S to F/N.
STEP EIGHT
(Metered)
(a) What will his product be in volume?
Is that enough to bother about or will it have to be in greater
volume?
What would be viable as to volume?
Clean up RUSHED or Failures.
To F/N Cog VGIs.
STEP NINE
(Metered)
(a) What quality would be necessary?
Get various degrees of quality stated.
What would he have to do to attain that quality?
What volume could he attain?
What would he have to do to attain that?
To F/N Cog VGIs.
STEP TEN
(Metered)
(a) Can he get others to want the products he put out?
What would he have to do to attain this?
STEP ELEVEN
(In BIG Clay)
(This is a progressive Clay Demo
added to at each step!)
(a) How does his product or products fit into the framework of his
section? Requires he work out the section product if his is not it.
Then fit his to it.
(b) How does his product fit into the Department? Requires he work out
the Department's product and fit his to it if his is not the Dept's
product.
(c) How does his product fit into the Division's products? He will have
to work out the Div's product or consult HCO P/L 8 Nov 73FA revised 9
Mar 74, "The VFPs and GDSs of the Divisions of an Org".
(d) How does the Division's Product exchange with the Public? And for
what?
(e) What happens to the org on this exchange?
STEP TWELVE
(In Big Clay)
(a) What blocks might he encounter in getting out his product?
(b) What can HE do about these?
STEP THIRTEEN
(2 wc)
(a) What does he have to have to get his product out? (Beware of too much
have before he can do. Get him to cut it back so he is more causative.)
STEP FOURTEEN
(Written by Pc)
(a) What is his product on the 1st Dynamic-self?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(b) What is his product on the 2nd Dynamic-family and sex?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(c) What is his product on the 3rd Dynamic-Groups?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(d) What is his product on the 4th Dynamic-Mankind?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(e) What is his product on the 5th Dynamic-animal and vegetable kingdom?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(f) What is his product on the 6th Dynamic-the Universe of Matter,
Energy, Space and Time?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(g) What is his product on the 7th Dynamic-beings as spirits-thetans?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(h) What is his product on the 8th Dynamic-God or the Infinite or
religion?
How does it fit in with what he is doing?
(i) What is his post Product?
(j) Can he get it out now?
Est O or Product Clearer
Note this long form has to be run on leading executives and eventually
on all staff. The short form in Est O Series 5, 14 points, series as a
rapid action. Where there is any hang-up on the short form, send the person
to an auditor. Where there is a hang-up on the long form, send the person
to an auditor. The auditing action is to fly ruds on the RD and assess any
key words the pc is upset about and do an 18 button prepcheck carrying each
prepcheck button to F/N.
TA
Where the TA is already high do not attempt the short or long form.
Where the person turns on a rockslam check for rings on the hands. If
so, remove rings. Note if R/S continues.
In either case the person should be programmed for TA trouble with C/S
53RRR and handled, and then given a GF40RR Method 3 (F/Ning each Question
that reads) and then running the engrams with drugs run first.
Product Clearing is best done after Word Clearing No. 1 is successfully
done.
An Est O who can use a meter and Method 4 WCing and knows Clay Demoing
can do it.
HCO Bulletins are planned to be issued on this RD to handle it on rough
ones or repair it as needed in the hands of an expert auditor.
LRH: mes.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO PL is modified by HCO PL 9 May 1974, Prod-Org, Esto and Older
Systems Reconciled, which is in the Management Series 1970-1974, page 438.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 NOVEMBER 1971
(Revises HCO BULLETIN OF 20 AUGUST 1971
ISSUE 1)
Remimeo
Div IV HGC
Dept 13
Revised 24 MARCH 1972
With W/Clearing Corrn List and
Study Corrn List Added)
HAS SPECIALIST AND ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER
AUDITING PROGRAM (Revised)
(Reference HCO PL 20 Aug 71,
Issue I, "HAS TROUBLES")
(This Program has been revised to
improve results and stability.)
The HAS (HCO Area Secretary), any HCO Executive Secretary, HCO Cope
Officer, HCO Org Officer, Tech Establishment Officer, any HAS Deputy OR any
Executive or Divisional Head or staff member who shows a tendency to
transfer or unstabilize staff members or who fails to hat others, must be
processed especially in order to be totally stable on post.
The HAS and Establishment Officers are peculiarly subject to efforts to
unstabilize them. These require the Program to be done in any case whether
stable or not.
Executives or staff members who show signs of obsessive transfer of the
staff or org are also greatly benefited.
The HAS Specialist Rundown consists of processes which increase the
ability to hold a position.
THE RUNDOWN MAY ONLY BE DONE WHEN NO EXISTING AUDITING PROGRAM IS ONLY
PARTIALLY DONE. COMPLETE THE EXISTING CYCLE FIRST.
HAS RUNDOWN
Action 1. C/S Series 53RRR Handle _________
Action 2. Word Clearing Corrn List Handle _________
Action 3. Study Corn List Handle _________
Action 4. GF M5 Handle _________
Action 5. TR Course to Full EP _________
Action 6. Admin TRs or Upper Indoc if Admin TRs not available
_________
Action 7. GF 40XRR Method 3 _________
Action 8. C/S Series 54 and Handle _________
(Includes GF 40 Engrams)
Action 9. L3B on Early Dn 1-80 to F/N List _________
Action 10. PTS RD Steps A, B, C, D _________
WARNING: RUN ONLY IF REQUIRED PER READS IN 3 OR 7 ABOVE.
Action 11. CCHs (Run or verify and rehab) _________
Action 12. Hold It Still. (HCO B 23 July 71, Page 2 Version B.)
_________
(Run or verify and rehab.)
Action 13. Start-Change-Stop (SCS) on an object. (Run or _________
verify and rehab. )
Action 14. Start-Change-Stop. (Run or verify and rehab.) _________
Action 15. Op Pro By Dup (Book and Bottle). (Run or verify _________
and rehab.)
Action 16. Effort Processing. _________
Action 17. Rising Scale. _________
Action 18. Verify Int RD, run if not run in No.1 or date to blow
_________
locate to blow if not done.
Action 19. Fly all ruds and overts recently. _________
Action 20. Program for further auditing in own org on Grade _________
Chart.
_________
Caution: Do not repeat Processes already done on the pc.
PACK: HCO B 20 Nov 71 (Revising HCO B 20 Aug 71, Issue II, Checklist)
is auditor's checksheet for the above, giving all materials. It is done by
Tr and Serv Aide. Packs can be locally assembled or procured from CLO A/CS-
2. Most of these materials occur in Level I PABs SHSBC.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .sb .mes.rd
Copyright � 1971, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The 24 March 1972 revision added Actions 2, 3, 9 and 10, and added "and
Establishment Officer" to the title. ]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 1972R
Issue II
REVISED 3 DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo
COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST
STUDY CORR LIST 2R
(Reference LRH ED 174 INT)
The Supervisor Correction List is designed to help locate the
individual reasons a supervisor has for not fully applying the study tech
in supervision.
The list is normally done in Qual but may also be done by a D/T on his
supervisors. It merely assists a D/T or Qual Personnel in finding why the
supervisor is not using study tech.
The list is assessed Method Five and handled as indicated. A second
bracket in the handling shows the further actions to be done after the list
has been F/Ned on all reading items.
NAME: DATE:______________
AUDITOR: __________________________________________________________
0. DID YOU GO THROUGH EACH STUDY TAPE ONCE CLEARING EVERY DEFINITION OF
EACH WORD AND THEN LISTEN TO IT FOR UNDERSTANDING AND A THIRD TIME
IF THERE WERE ANY MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS ON THE SECOND AND DID YOU DO
THE SAME ON THE STUDENT HAT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Pgm for PRD or PRD retread.)
00. DO YOU HAVE A REASON YOU ARE NOT USING THE STUDY TECH?
(L&N "What reason do you have for not using study tech?'') (Pgm for
PRD retread or PRD after Cramming on the Why.)
000. HAS A WRONG WHY BEEN FOUND FOR YOUR NOT USING STUDY TECH?
(L4BR and handle. Find the right Why.) (Pgm for PRD retread or PRD
after Cramming on the Why.)
0000. HAVE YOU DONE ALL THESE THINGS ALREADY AND STILL HAVE TROUBLE
WITH STUDY?
(Do Student Rehabilitation List HCO B 15 Nov 74.)
00000. HASN'T A WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST BEEN DONE?
(Get it done. )
1. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK ON COURSE?
(Find what, ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
2. DO YOU HAVE PROBLEMS WITH SUPERVISION?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
3. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS ON STUDENTS?
(Get them, E/S to F/N.)
4. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS ON STUDY?
(Get them, E/S to F/N.)
5. ARE YOU SUPERVISING OVER WITHHOLDS?
(Pull them, E/S to F/N.)
6. ARE YOU AFRAID OF BEING FOUND OUT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
7. DID YOU FALSIFY YOUR STATS?
(2wc E/S to F/N) (Get them corrected.)
8. HAVE YOU NEVER DONE A SUPERVISOR'S COURSE?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Get person onto supervisor course.)
9. HAVE YOU NEVER STUDIED THE STUDY TECH?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Get it studied.)
10. HAVE YOU NEVER LISTENED TO THE STUDY TAPES?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Get them studied.)
11. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON THE STUDY MATERIALS? (Method 4 word
clear.) (And retread.)
12. DON'T YOU KNOW HOW TO SUPERVISE?
(Find out what areas he doesn't know. WC Method 4.) (And retread. )
13. DOING OTHER WORK IN CLASS TIME?
(Get the W/H off E/S to F/N.)
14. ARE YOU AFRAID OF CONSEQUENCES?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
15. ARE YOU AFRAID OF TEACHING THEM WRONG?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
16. HAS THE STUDY TECH NOT WORKED ON YOU?
(Find what didn't work, correct it to F/N and a win.)
17. DON'T YOU KNOW IF THE SUPERVISOR TECH WORKS?
(Find misunderstoods and handle.)
18. DO YOU THINK YOU SHOULD KNOW THE MATERIALS INSTEAD OF STUDY TECH?
(2wc E/S considerations to F/N.) (Find what study tech he didn't
understand, word clear Method 4.)
19. ARE YOU UNABLE TO REFER STUDENTS TO THEIR MATERIALS? (Find why and
handle. E.g. no materials, materials out of order, thinks he has to
know the materials instead of the study tech.)
20. ARE YOU GlVING VERBAL TECH?
(Get off the W/H E/S to F/N. Find out why he felt he had to do it and
clean it up.( (Forbid it and make it an Ethics offense.)
21. ARE YOU INTERPRETING BULLETINS?
(Get off the W/H E/S to F/M Find out why he felt he had to do it and
clean it up.) (Forbid it and make it an Ethics offense.)
22. DO YOU FAIL TO MAKE MATERIALS AVAILABLE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Pgm for Vital Info R/D.)
23. DON'T YOU HAVE THE COURSE MATERIALS?
(Find out what he could do about that, 2wc to F/N.)
24 . DON'T YOU KNOW HOW TO GET THE MATERIALS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Hat on relevant materials.)
25. DON'T KNOW WORD CLEARING TECH?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Find out if ever studied it in the first
place. If not get it studied, if so clean up misunderstoods.)
26. NEVER USING M9?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
27. CAN'T USE A METER?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Cram and drill on metering.)
28. USING NO STUDY LISTS?
(2wc E/S to F/M)
29. AFRAID OF DOING IT WRONG?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
30. TRs NOT GOOD ENOUGH?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Method 4 TRs HCO B, TRs including Admin TRs.)
31. INTERRUPTING STUDENTS WHO ARE F/Ning.
(2wc E/S to F/N 3-way Help/3-way Failed Help.)
32. CAN'T CONFRONT STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (2 hrs confronting full classroom of students. )
33. CAN'T CONFRONT A CLASSROOM?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (2 hrs confronting classroom, reach and withdraw
from a classroom.)
34. DON'T LIKE PEOPLE?
(O/W on people.)
35. DON'T LIKE STUDENTS?
(O/W on students.)
36. USING DURESS ON STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/M Find Why by L&N)
37. HAD LOSSES ON HELPING STUDENTS?
(3-way Help, 3-way Failed Help.)
38. DON'T BELIEVE STUDENTS CAN BE HELPED?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
39. CONSIDER IT IS WRONG TO CONTROL STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Objective processes especially SCS.)
40. 3RD PARTYING STUDENTS?
(Handle as an overt E/S to F/N)
41. OVERWHELMED BY LOTS OF STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (2 hrs confront on classroom full of students. )
42. AFRAID THAT IF STUDENTS GRADUATED WOULD HAVE NO MORE STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
43. AFRAID STUDENTS WILL KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
44. DON'T FEEL THE SUBJECT BEING SUPERVISED IS IMPORTANT? (2wc E/S to
F/N.)
45. NEGLECTING STUDENTS WHO ARE BOGGED?
(2wc to find out why. Handle the out rud or confusion to F/N )
46. THINKING CERTAIN STUDENTS ARE DOG STUDENTS AND SO NOT HELPING?
(Triple Ruds and Overts on students. 3 May PL if he hasn't had one.
WC M4 on super materials.)
47. HAVE OUTNESSES IN OWN STUDY?
(Student Rehabilitation List.)
48. HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON STUDY TECH?
(Method 4.) (And retread.)
49. HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON SUPERVISOR MATERIALS?
(Method 4.) (And retread.)
50. DON'T KNOW THE PRODUCT OF A SUPERVISOR?
(Product R/D.)
51. WORKING FOR SOME OTHER PRODUCT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
52. DON'T KNOW THE PRODUCT OF THE COURSE?
(Product R/D.)
53. DON'T KNOW HOW TO TELL WHEN THE PRODUCT IS ATTAINED? (Product R/D.)
54 . WORD CLEARING TECH DIDN'T WORK ON YOU?
(Word Clearing Correction List.)
55. DO YOU HAVE SOME OTHER IDEAS ON WHAT A SUPERVISOR SHOULD DO?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
56. WOULD YOU HAVE TO BE SOMEONE ELSE IN ORDER TO SUPERVISE?
(L&N Who else would you have to be to supervise?)
57. DO YOU HAVE FIXED IDEAS ON HOW TO SUPERVISE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
58. SHOULD YOU REALLY BE DOING SOMETHING ELSE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
59. DO YOU HAVE DISAGREEMENTS WITH THE STUDY TECH? (Method 4 Word
Clearing Tech.)
60. DO YOU HAVE DISAGREEMENTS WITH COURSE SUPERVISOR POLICY?
(2wc disagreements with course supervisor policy. 2wc agreements
with course supervisor policy.)
61. ARE YOU TRYING TO BE SOMETHING ELSE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
62. DON'T YOU REALLY WANT TO BE A SUPERVISOR?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
63. ARE YOU ON STAFF TO GET YOUR CASE HANDLED?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
64. SHOULDN'T YOU BE HERE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
65. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY UNWELL?
(Find what wrong, 2wc E/S to F/N.) (Medical, etc.)
66. DO YOU GET UPSET BY STUDENT MISEMOTION?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Also TRs.)
67. DO YOU CONSIDER STUDENTS HAVE TO BE FORCED TO STUDY? (2wc E/S
considerations to F/N.)
68. HAVE YOU HAD LOSSES AS A SUPERVISOR?
(Find what supervisor couldn't handle, Method 4 word clear relevant
materials.)
69. DO YOU LACK PATIENCE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
70. DO YOU CONSIDER STUDENT'S ABILITY IS NATIVE AND CANNOT BE REGULATED
BY STUDY TECH?
(2wc E/S considerations to F/N.)
71. DON'T YOU KNOW HOW TO HANDLE STUDENTS' QUESTIONS? (Method 4 WC Series
32R.) (And drill.)
72. ARE YOU SUPERVISING FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE?
(L&N What purpose do you have for supervising? R3R Triple if an E.
Purp. )
73. CAN'T TELL WHEN STUDENT IS BOGGED OR NOT F/Ning?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (TRs and obnosis drills and Tone Scale drills. )
74. CAN'T FIND WHY STUDENTS BOG?
(Method 4.) (And restudy study tapes, demo each reason for student
bog with supervisor handling, drill.)
75. SOMEBODY SAID YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO SUPERVISE?
(PTS Interview. Inval and Eval.)
76. HAVE YOU ENCOUNTERED A SUPPRESSIVE STUDENT?
(PTS Interview.)
77. IS SOMEBODY PREVENTING YOU FROM SUPERVISING?
(L&N Who is preventing you from supervising? Triple Ruds and Overts
on the terminal.)
78. DO YOU HAVE TOO MANY STUDENTS TO SUPERVISE FULLY? (2wc E/S to F/N.)
(Also handle with Est-O if true.)
79. ARE YOU DOUBLE HATTED WITH ANOTHER POST?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Also handle with Tech O/O.)
80. ARE YOU GETTING CROSS ORDERS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Handle with Tech O/O if true.)
81. ARE YOU EXPERIMENTING WITH STUDY METHODS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
82. ARE SOME STUDENTS NOT WORTH SUPERVISING?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
83. DOES IT GIVE YOU MORE STATUS IF YOU ANSWER THE STUDENTS' QUESTIONS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
84. ARE YOU TRYING TO BE IMPORTANT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
85. ARE YOU TRYING TO BE INTERESTING?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
86. ARE YOU BEING TOLD TO DO SOMETHING ELSE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Also hatting actions.)
87. ARE YOU TOO TIRED TO SUPERVISE?
(Find out why. 2wc E/S to F/N.) (Get person to get enough sleep.)
88. DON'T YOU BELIEVE THE STUDENT WILL MAKE IT?
(2wc E/S considerations to F/N.)
89. ARE SOME STUDENTS BOUND TO FAIL ANYWAY?
(2wc E/S considerations to F/N.)
90. IS IT AN OVERT TO MAKE SOMEBODY MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE? (2wc E/S to F/N.)
(Pgm for Vital Info R/D.)
91. WOULD IT MAKE YOU LESS POWERFUL IF OTHERS KNEW MORE?
(How? 2wc E/S to F/N.) (Pgm for Ex Dn.)
92. DOES THE STUDY TECH CONFLICT WITH WHAT YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT
TEACHING?
(Find out what other ideas person has about teaching E/S to F/N.
Student Rehab List on his early studies. )
93. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THE USE OF DEMOS?
(Word clear demo materials.) (Then get it used to a win.)
94. ARE YOU NOT REALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPETENCE OF THE
STUDENT AFTER HE GRADUATES?
(Product R/D.)
95. ARE YOU REALLY TRYING TO TEACH SOMETHING ELSE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
96. HAVE YOU NOT REALLY STARTED ON POST?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Get person instant hatted and onto post.)
97. ARE YOU LEAVING POST? (2wc E/S to F/N.)
98. ARE YOU ON DRUGS? (Find what-rehab.)
99. ARE YOU BEING AGREEABLE TO THE STUDENTS?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
100. ARE YOU TRYING TO BE POPULAR?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
101. ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE YOURSELF RIGHT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
102. ARE YOU TRYING TO PROVE THAT STUDENTS DON'T KNOW?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
103. ARE YOU WORKING FOR A STATISTIC RATHER THAN FOR A PRODUCT?
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
104. HAVE YOU NOT STUDIED NEW ISSUES ON COURSE SUPERVISION?
(Get the W/H off to F/N.) (Get checked out on all neglected issues.)
(Get Qual high crime policy in.)
105. DON'T YOU HAVE ANY SUPERVISOR MATERIALS TO REFER TO?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Handle through D of T.)
106. MATERIALS WERE MISSING FROM COURSE SUPERVISOR COURSE?
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Find what was missing and get it-studied.)
107. HAVE YOU BEEN CONFRONTED WITH SITUATIONS NOT COVERED BY STUDY TECH?
(Find out what situations, Method 4 word clear tech on relevant
materials as something was missed.)
108. IS THERE SOME OTHER REASON YOU CAN'T APPLY STUDY TECH?
(Find out what. Student Rehab List if not done. ) (Word clear and
drill relevant materials.)
Handle each reading item to F/N as noted. Then fill in attached form
for further actions to be done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCO B 27 March 72R, Issue II
Attachment
COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION FORM
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS REQUIRED
TO: DIR CORRECTION Date:_________________
PART A. The following additional training actions are to be done on this
supervisor.
1. Done_________
2. Done_________
3. Done_________
4. Done_________
5. Done_________
PART B: The following corrective actions must also be done regarding
course outnesses found.
1. Done_________
2. Done_________
3. Done_________
4. Done_________
5. Done_________
___________________________
Auditor
Handling completed:___________________________
Dir Correction
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 1972RA
Issue III
REVISED & REISSUED 17 DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo
CANCELS
BTB OF 27 MARCH 1972R
Issue III
Study Corr List 3RA
AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST
AUDITOR RECOVERY
Reference: LRH ED 257 INT
"DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS"
The list is assessed Method Five and handled as indicated. A second
bracket in the handling shows the further actions to be done after the list
has been F/Ned on all reading items.
NAME: DATE: _________
AUDITOR: ____________________________________________
1. AS AN AUDITOR HAVE YOU HAD AN ARC BREAK. _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
2. AS AN AUDITOR HAVE YOU HAD A PROBLEM. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
3. AS AN AUDITOR, HAS A W/H BEEN MISSED. _________
(Pull it, 2wc E/S to F/N.)
4. GIVEN A WRONG WHY. _________
(L4BR & Handle.)
5. GIVEN A WRONG WHY FOR AUDITING FAILURES. _________
(L4BR & Handle.)
6. CRAMMING GAVE A WRONG WHY. _________
(L4BR & Handle.)
7. GIVEN A WRONG ETHICS CONDITION. _________
(L4BR & Handle.)
8. PROBLEMS WITH PCS. _________
(Do C/S Series 50, HCO B 15 July 71.)
9. W/Hs ABOUT PCS. _________
(Pull them, 2wc E/S to F/N.)
10. NEVER AUDITED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
11. OVERTS ON PCS. _________
(Pull them, 2wc E/S to F/N.)
12. NO HELP FROM A D OF P. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
13. TROUBLE WITH TECH SERVICES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
14. UPSET WITH A C/S. _________
TECH SEC. _________
SENIOR EXEC. _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
15. PTS TO SOMEONE IN THE ENVIRONMENT. _________
(L4BR & Handle.)
16. TOLD YOU WERE PTS AND YOU WEREN'T. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. L4BR if any trouble.)
17. AUDITING WITHOUT STUDYING THE FOLDER AND
UNDERSTANDING THE PC'S CASE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
18. AUDITING WITHOUT AN FES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
19. BREAKING THE AUDITOR'S CODE. _________
(2wc what E/S to F/N.)
20. AUDITING A WRONG C/S. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
21. AUDITING A WRONG PROGRAM. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
22. HAD SOME SORT OF OUT ETHICS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
23. DISCUSSING PCS' CASES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
24. LOSSES ON PCS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
25. WERE YOU TAKEN OFF AUDITING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
26. A PC YOU FAILED TO HELP. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (3-Way Help/3-Way Failed Help.)
27. AUDITING AN NCG. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
28. COULDN'T HELP A PC. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (3-Way Help/3-Way Failed Help.)
29. AN EARLIER TIME YOU FAILED TO HELP. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
30. COULDN'T SOLVE IT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
31. AUDITING A PC OVER AN: ARC BREAK. _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.)
PROBLEM . _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
W/H. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
OVERT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
OUT ETHICS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
32. DIDN'T GET ALL OF THE WITHHOLDS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
33. AUDITED UNSESSIONABLE PCS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
34. CAN'T GET A PC IN SESSION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
35. MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS IN AUDITING. _________
(Find & clear them, each to F/N.)
36. MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS IN DIANETICS & SCIEN- _________
TOLOGY.
(Find & clear them, each to F/N.)
37. COULDN'T UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICAL TERMS. _________
(Find & clear them, each to F/N.)
38. AN EARLIER SIMILAR SUBJECT WAS MISUNDER- _________
STOOD.
(2wc, find what word in the subject was Mis-U & clear it up.
Clear each word to F/N.)
39. WAS YOUR TRAINING INADEQUATE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N & STUDENT REHAB LIST.)
40. RUSHED THROUGH COURSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N & STUDENT REHAB LIST.)
41. SEEKING STATUS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
42. YOU HAD DISAGREEMENTS. _________
(Find out what, find the Mis-U words & clear to F/N.)
43. EARLIER PRACTICE IN YOUR ROAD. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Pgm for GF40 Handling.)
44. OUT 2D. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
45. OUT 2D WITH PCS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
46. EVALUATION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
47. INVALIDATION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
48. AFRAID OF AUDITING SOMEONE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Fear of People RD.)
49. FORCED A PC TO RUN A PROCESS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
50. TROUBLE WITH: TR 0. TR 1. TR 2. TR 3 . TR 4. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
51. YOUR TRS WERE INVALIDATED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Rehab any win.)
52. COULDN'T GET YOUR QUESTION ANSWERED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
53. DISINTERESTED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle any out ruds.)
54. FALSELY PASSED TRS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
55. FLUBBED COMMANDS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
56. NOT AUDITING FOR THE PC. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
57. DIDN'T WRITE IT DOWN ON THE W/S. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
58. FALSIFIED A W/S. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
59. AUDITING FOR SPECIAL FAVORS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
60. COLLECTED FALSE BONUSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
61. COULDN'T GET PAID. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
62. COULDN'T MASTER AN E-METER. _________
(2wc, find out what he didn't understand about it and clean
up to F/N.)
63. METER IN THE WRONG PLACE. _________
(2wc, find out what was wrong and correct to F/N.)
64. DIDN'T STARRATE PROCESSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
65. NOT ENOUGH DRILLING ON PROCESSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
66. DIDN'T WANT THE LIST TO READ. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
67. COULDN'T GET READS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
68. WEREN'T SURE OF E-METER READS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
69. CAN'T TELL AN F/N. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
70. WORRIED ABOUT TA. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
71. CALLED F/Ns ABOVE 3. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
72. CALLED F/Ns BELOW 2. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
73. COULDN'T F/N A LIST. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
74. SAID THE LIST F/NED WHEN IT DIDN'T. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
75. COULDN'T TELL AN R/S. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
76. TROUBLE WITH ASSESSMENT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
77. TROUBLE WITH L&N. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
78. NOBODY TO AUDIT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
79. PREVENTED FROM AUDITING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
80. FORCED TO AUDIT UNDER BAD CIRCUMSTANCES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
81. DOG CASES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Pull all W/Hs.)
82. RABBITED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
83. GOT DESPERATE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
84. SQUIRRELING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
85. TRIED UNUSUAL SOLUTIONS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
86. AUDITING WITHOUT A METER. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
87. COFFEE SHOP AUDITING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
88. USING NON-STANDARD PROCESSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
89. USING CONFIDENTIAL PROCESSES ON LOWER LEVEL
PCS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
90. MOONLIGHTING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
91. AUDITING ORG PCS OUTSIDE THE ORG. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
92. C/SING IN THE CHAIR. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
93. AUDITING WITHOUT A C/S. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N, handle as a W/H.)
94. NOT GETTING ANY CRAMMING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
95. AVOIDING CRAMMING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
96. SHOULD BE RETRAINED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. STUDENT REHAB LIST.)
97. WAS TOLD TO RETRAIN WHEN IT WASN'T WARRANTED. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
98. TECH DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.) (Note for further handling by Qual.)
99. TECH DOESN'T WORK ON YOU. _________
(C/S 53RI. GF M5 and handle.)
100. SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR EYESIGHT. _________
(2wc what E/S to F/N.)
101. RESTIM. _________
(C/S 53RI.)
102. TROUBLE WITH YOUR OWN CASE. _________
(C/S 53RI.)
103. SOMETHING ELSE WRONG. _________
(2wc what & if no joy GF M5 & handle.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: clb .nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MARCH 1972
Remimeo Study Series 5
Qual Secs
IMPORTANT
Dept of Personnel Enhancement
PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
FIRST CRAMMING CORRECTION
As it is obviously a waste of Cramming time to cram an auditor, student
or staff member who has not known how to study (see LRH ED 174 Int 29 Mar
72 for data on this), it is vital that HIS FIRST CRAMMING ACTION is done in
the Dept of Personnel Enhancement.
This department must be staffed and set up to do (a) Programming, (b)
Word Clearing No. 1, (c) Word Clearing No. 2, (d) Word Clearing No. 4, (e)
Word Clearing Correction Lists, (f) Int Ext Correction Lists, (g) Tape Word
Clearing with footpedal operated tape players, (h) Good quality Study Tape
sets, (i) Student Packs, (j) Demo Kits, (k) Clay table large size, (l)
Product Clearing, (m) Post Purpose Clearing, (n) Product and Student
Corrections.
All the staff of this Dept MUST do this complete rundown rapidly on
themselves. Otherwise their actions will be flubby as they probably will
not be able to grasp their own special rundowns unless this program has
been followed by themselves. BUT THIS ACTION MAY NOT BE USED TO PREVENT
ACTIVE PRODUCTION BY D OF PE staff on doing this Rundown.
PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
1. Case repair to handle high or low TAs or upsets. THIS STEP IS NOT
DONE IF THE TA IS USUALLY BETWEEN 2 and 3 in auditing.
This would consist of a C/S 53RRR and handle, a GF Method 5 and
handle, a GF40RR Method 3 and handle, plus any special actions to
complete an incomplete auditing cycle or repair it.
At this stage any auditing should be done only on thoroughly cleared
commands (each word no matter how small) and assessment lists should be
done only after clearing each word on the prepared list (but not spoken
as a full question).
2. WORD CLEARING NUMBER 1 to full EP, using the WC Correction List at
any sign of somatics or bad Exam report after a word clearing session.
3. FIND THE WHY he did not use the Study Tech in the first place. There
will be an individual WHY. (See Data Series P/Ls.) It is seldom only
Misunderstood words. (See LRH ED 174 Int for some examples.) Handle
this WHY. It may require processing.
AUDITING INTERLUDE
4. The WHY is HANDLED in auditing sessions as indicated. May require
objective processes or hidden standards. The Handling of the Why is
directly related to the WHY that was found.
5. THE STUDY CORRECTION LIST is handled. This is HCO B 4 Feb 72
(revising HCO B 14 Jan 72). This prepared list is assessed Method 5
(all lines assessed) and then the reads are handled from the best to
the least. THE END PRODUCT AT THIS STAGE IS A PERSON WHOSE CASE AND
PAST ARE NOT IN THE ROAD OF HIS STUDYING.
STUDY TECH SECTION
6. STUDY TAPES. (a) One time through picking up and looking up every
word even faintly in doubt of or when not understanding, going back to
find the word that was missed. (b) Then going through the Study Tapes
for content with Method 4 at the End of each tape. If it reads on any
misunderstood clear it up, then replay the tape. In this way get the
Study Tapes fully known without Misunderstood ideas or words. (c) Check
M4 at the end of this action and if there is any misunderstood idea or
query of any kind then handle it per M4 and have the person do all the
tapes again. The End product of this action is fully known Study Tapes
with F/N VGIs.
7. STUDENT HAT. (a) Have the person go through each P/L or HCO B in the
Student Hat with this cycle: Each time a misunderstood word is found
even in the middle of the page, do the whole P/L again. Complete the
whole hat in this way. (b) Then go through the whole hat again starrate
checked out and using Demo Kit. At each point where a new misunderstood
idea or word turns up do the whole P/L. If any misunderstoods show up
on this second run through, the whole Hat must be done again. (c) Have
the student do a BIG proper Clay Demo of some study materials. (d)
Check if the student can now use a Demo Kit while he is doing his own
studies and get any WHY he cannot and Handle. The End product here is a
STUDENT WHO CAN AND WILL USE STUDY TECH IN STUDYING AND WHO WILL STUDY
AND STUDY PROPERLY.
8. Verify the WHY found in 3 above and see if it is all okay now. If not
find new WHY and rehandle.
9. WORD CLEAR 2 first Dianetic or Scientology materials ever heard or
read. (a) Find which it was. (b) WC2 it.
10. Find what queries and questions the person has about Admin or Tech.
Do WC M4 on each one.
11. Send the person to Cramming to get the specific Cramming order, Tech
or Admin, carried out.
12. Report the Course Super and D of T who "trained him" to the Ethics
Officer for action.
_________
It is obviously senseless to Cram someone (and proven by actual
experience) whose Study Tech is out and whose misunderstood words and
omitted study will not let him retain anything anyway. He will just go on
goofing. That has been amply proven.
Cramming can assess a Student Correction List HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue I,
or a Supervisor Correction List HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue II, or an Auditor
Correction List HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue III, or a C/S Correction List HCO B
27 Mar 72, Issue IV, or an Executive Correction List HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue
V, and these will catch any Personnel Enhancement flub and other classroom
reasons.
Things found on such lists should be reported to the Ethics Officer for
handling.
Qual is after all the CORRECTION DIVISION. And correction usually
cannot be accomplished without Ethics back-up.
At first glance this is a lot to do for a student or staff member. BUT IF
IT IS NOT DONE YOU DO NOT HAVE A STUDENT OR A STAFF MEMBER.
Students and staff members must be charged for all this, the staff
member usually on just a debit invoice but which comes due and owing on his
departure, the student for cash through the Registrar. Do not fail to make
these charges as you are rewarding a downstat who should have done it right
in the first place and who didn't.
So don't run up a big Dept of Pers Enhancement Payroll that is never
used to get the exchange.
Also DO NOT BACKLOG or you can tie up a whole org and keep its stats in
the basement BY NOT RAPIDLY DOING THESE ACTIONS TO TOTAL END PRODUCT.
If you don't get the End Product all the work is wasted.
The Commonest Error in word clearing or auditing is a FAILURE TO USE
CORRECTION LISTS. WC Corr List, WC Series 35, has been the most needed and
most neglected list in orgs.
_________
As Study Tech is the material which tells HOW to study, the technique
of study is not applied to IT. Thus it becomes unknown easily and goes out
very easily.
Without it, I assure you, an org will get nowhere.
Thus this action of the Dept of PE is a vital action and done well it
will keep the org alive.
BE SURE TO DO THIS WELL AND GET A CASH EXCHANGE FOR THIS VITAL SERVICE!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B has been corrected per HCO B 3 April 1972, Issue III, Re:
Study Series 5, the entire text of which says, " 'HCO B of 30 March 1972,
IMPORTANT, Dept of Personnel Enhancement, Primary Correction Rundown First
Cramming Correction' is STUDY SERIES 5. Correct your copy to read 'Study
Series 5'."]
EXPANDED DIANETICS LECTURES
Flagship Apollo
30 March-7 April 1972
** 7203C30 SO XDN- 1 Expanded Dianetics
** 7204C07A SO XDN-2 Expanded Dianetics and Word Clearing
** 7204C07B SO XDN-3 Auditor Administration
** 7204C07C SO XDN-4 Illness Breakthrough
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 31 MARCH 1972
Central Orgs
London
Washington
Los Angeles
Denmark Expanded Dianetics Series 1
Sydney
EXPANDED DIANETICS is that branch of Dianetics which uses Dianetics in
special ways for specific purposes.
It is not HSDC Dianetics. Its position on the Grade Chart would be
regulated by the use to which it is put. It could be below Standard
Dianetics, just above Standard Dianetics or above OT III in the OT Scales.
It uses Dianetics to change an Oxford Capacity Analysis (or an American
Personality Analysis) and is run directly against these analysis graphs and
the "Science of Survival Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation".
EXPANDED DIANETICS IS NOT THE SAME AS STANDARD DIANETICS.
The HSDC is qualified to run Standard Dianetics. He is not authorized
to run EXPANDED DIANETICS without special training.
DO NOT MIX EXPANDED DIANETICS INTO STANDARD DIANETICS.
It often happens that one technology's skills are mingled with
another's. The result is that neither then work.
Standard Dianetics will go right on producing results.
The main difference between these two branches is that Standard
Dianetics is very general in application. Expanded Dianetics is very
specifically adjusted to the pc.
Some pcs, particularly heavy drug cases, or who have been given
injurious psychiatric treatment or who are physically disabled or who are
chronically ill or who have had trouble running engrams (to name a few)
require a specially adapted technology.
A very good Dianetic or Dianetic and Class IV auditor preferably HSDC &
Class VI can be specially trained to run Dianetics against the OCA or the
Chart of Human Evaluation.
STUDY
(Subject to Change)
This training would consist of:
1. HSDC
2. STANDARD DIANETIC INTERNE HGC OK TO AUDIT
3. PRIMARY RD HCOB 30 Mar 72
4. Social Counselor Cse or Ruds Flying or Class IV
5. Full Word Clearer Rating
6. FESing
7. Programming
8. Expanded Dianetic Tapes and HCOBs
9. C/S Folder Study
10. Active Auditing on the skills taught
11. C/Sing Expanded Dianetics.
CERTIFICATE
The Certificate would be HUBBARD GRADUATE DIANETIC SPECIALIST.
The Certificate Level is above Standard Dianetics HSDC and if the
person is a Class IV is just above Class IV.
It would be greatly preferable if the person were an HSDC and a Class
IV as word clearing and rudiments would be easier to learn but Class IV is
not required at this time.
CHARGES
Hours of Expanded Dianetics, because of the skills required, should be
at least half again or double as much as Standard Dianetic Auditing.
The cost of the Course would be the same as the HSDC Course and
additional to it plus Interne fees.
PREREQUISITE
HSDC and Dianetic Interneship minimum with a successful period of
Standard Dianetic Auditing as an auditor. Optimum is also a Class IV or VI.
Case gain as a Dianetic pc.
DEVELOPMENT
This Course is under development as this is written and neither the
Course nor Expanded Dianetic Auditing may be sold by an org unless it has
an Expanded Dianetic Specialist, to be specific, an HGDS.
WHEN RELEASED THE COURSE WILL BE TAUGHT IN CENTRAL ORGS (LONDON,
WASHINGTON, LOS ANGELES, JOHANNESBURG, DENMARK AND SYDNEY AND SHs). IT IS
THE SPECIAL COURSE THE CONTINENTAL CENTRAL ORG TEACHES.
The HCOBs relating to Expanded Dianetics will be released as a part of
this series so that orgs will have them when it comes time for them to
acquire the tapes and teach this course.
In the meanwhile these orgs should be making HSDCs and Class IVs.
PERSONS NOT TRAINED ON IT MAY NOT RUN IT OR USE IT REGARDLESS OF CLASS.
To repeat, Expanded Dianetics does not replace Standard Dianetics or
any other Class and is itself and is used for its own specific purposes on
special cases.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright �1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 APRIL 1972RB
Issue II
(REVISED 17 MARCH 1974)
Remimeo
Ex Dn Chkshts
I M P O R T A N T
Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB
L3 EXD RB
EXPANDED DIANETICS REPAIR LIST
This list includes the most frequent Exp Dianetic & R3R errors.
A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a
chain of incidents.
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as
it can have different or several errors.
REMEMBER TO CLEAR EACH WORD ON THIS LIST. IF A QUESTION READS AND THE
PC SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it
and take it as it read on a misunderstood not on a fact).
RUNNING PCS ON EXP DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN C/S I
INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION.
TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY FULL REPAIR OF IT PER THE INSTRUCTIONS.
1. There was an Earlier Similar incident. _________
Indicate it, flatten the chain.
2. There was no Earlier Similar incident. _________
Indicate it. Determine if the chain is flat or if the last incident
needs to be run through again. Complete the chain to F/N by
indication or D/L if needed, or by flattening it.
3. There was an earlier beginning. _________
Indicate it. Handle with R3R and complete the chain.
4. There was no earlier beginning. _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain with R3R ABCD on last incident
if unflat.
5. An F/N was indicated too soon. _________
Indicate it. Flatten the last incident.
6. An F/N was indicated too late. _________
Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if
necessary.
7. An F/N was not indicated at all. _________
Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if
necessary.
8. There was no charge on an item in the first place. _________
Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run, D/L if necessary.
9. Jumped chains. _________
Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain, spot flat point and
indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary, or flatten the chain.
10. Flubbed commands. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
11. Didn't have a command. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
12. Misunderstood on the command. _________
Find it and clear it.
13. Incident should be run through one more time. _________
Indicate it. ABCD on the incident, flatten the chain.
14. Too late on the chain. _________
Indicate it. Get the Earlier Similar incident and complete the
chain with R3R.
14A Wrong Flow. _________
Indicate it. Run it the way pc feels it should be run.
15. Incident gone more solid. _________
Indicate it. Check for earlier incident or earlier beginning and
complete the chain.
16. Stopped running an incident that was erasing. _________
Indicate it. ABCD on the incident and erase it.
17. Went past basic on a chain. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary.
18. An earlier misrun incident restimulated. _________
Indicate it. Find out what it was and do an L-3RD on it.
19. Two or more incidents got confused. _________
Indicate it, sort it out with an L-3RD on it.
20. An implant was restimulated. _________
Indicate it, if no joy do an L-3RD on the time of the
restimulation.
21. The incident was really an implant. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary or L-3RD on it.
22. Wrong Item. _________
Indicate it was a wrong item and that all other actions
connected with it were wrong. If it is from an L&N list or if any
question or difficulty, L-4BR.
22A It was really your attitudes to it that should have been run.
_________
Indicate it. List the attitudes, R3R triple and exhaust the list.
22B It was really the emotions connected with it that should have been
run _________
Indicate it. List the emotions, R3R triple and exhaust the list.
22C It was really your intentions that should have been run.
_________
Indicate it. List the intentions, R3R triple and exhaust the list.
23. Not your item. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
24. Not your incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-3RD if any trouble.
25. Same thing run twice. _________
Indicate it. Spot the first flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if
necessary, or run out the session.
26. There was a wrong date. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat.
27. There was no date for the incident. _________
Indicate it. Get the date and flatten the incident if unflat.
28. It was a false date. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat.
29. There was an incorrect duration. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if
unflat.
30. No duration was found for the incident. _________
Indicate it. Get the duration and flatten the incident if unflat.
31. There was a false duration. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if
unflat.
32. An earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated. _________
Locate what it was, indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD if
necessary.
33. An earlier ARC Break on engrams was restimulated. _________
Indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD, ARCU CDEINR or an L-1C
as applicable, or run out the session.
34. There was an ARC Break in the incident. _________
Indicate it. Flatten the incident if unflat. ARCU CDEINR at that
time if necessary.
34A Destructive impulse been missed. _________
Get it. It should BD F/N. If this turns into a listing action
complete
the list to BD F/N item.
35. You were protesting. _________
Indicate it, clean it up E/S to F/N.
36. Auditor demanded more than you could see. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary, or run out the session.
37. Auditor refused to accept what you were saying. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary, or run out the session.
38. You were prevented from running an incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if
necessary, or run out the session.
39. You were distracted while running an incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if
necessary, or run out the session.
40. Audited over an ARC Brk _________
Problem _________
Withhold _________
Indicate it and handle the out rud. Do not pull W/Hs before the
engram or chain is repaired or it will mush engrams.
41. An item was suppressed. _________
Indicate it. Get the suppress off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten
the item.
42. An item was invalidated. _________
Indicate it. Get the inval off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the
item.
43. An item was abandoned. _________
Indicate it, get the item back and run or flatten it.
44. The wording of the item was changed. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Flatten it
if unflat.
45. Stuck picture. _________
Indicate it. Do an L-3RD on it. You can also unstick it by having
him recall a time before it and recall a time after it. D/L if
necessary.
46. All black. _________
Spot the black field or picture. Get the correct duration. If no go,
L3RD on it.
47. Invisible. _________
Spot the invisible field or picture. L-3RD on it.
48. Constantly changing pictures. _________
Indicate there was a misassessment and a wrong item was taken
off the list. Get the correct item and run it, or L-3RD on that
session.
49. There was a persistent mass. _________
L3RD on it, or D/L.
50. There was trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item.
_________
L-3RD on it, or D/L.
51. You went exterior. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary or rehab. If TA high as a result of
this do
an Int RD Correction List or send to the C/S if pc hasn't had Int RD.
52. Your Int RD was messed up. _________
Indicate it, Int RD Corr List if TA high. If TA OK, 2wc "going
into things" or clear up any misunderstoods on Int, Ext, etc.
53. Audited over Drugs or Medicine. _________
Indicate it. L3RD on that time, then verify all chains to ensure
they erased.
54. A past death restimulated. _________
Indicate it, if it doesn't blow run it out.
55. There was nothing wrong in the first place. _________
Indicate it. Continue the action you were on.
56. The real reason was missed. _________
Indicate it. Locate the real reason and handle or do a GF.
57. Something else wrong. _________
Locate what it is and sort it out or do a GF M5 and handle.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ntm jh
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
Study Series 6
PRIMARY RUNDOWN NOTE
Reference HCO B 30 Mar 72
LRH ED 174 Int
In going through the Study Tapes the first time, the student looks up
every word.
On this first time he does not study for the sense of what is being
said. He only listens to words.
In this and in Method 4 word clearing, when being checked he is asked
"What is the definition of (word)?" He is NOT asked "Do you know the
meaning of
(word)?" To this he could answer "Yes" and believe he did. But when
asked for the definition that he must then give, it is a different story
entirely.
This is also the right way to handle any defining of words. M2, M4. As
well as Methods I & 3.
Never let the student be unsure. Make him look it up.
You will find that it is the simple word, "as", "such", "from", that
really bogs reading, not technical terms.
In the Study Tapes there are some photographic terms. Any photo
dictionary can give these. Almost any camera store has such dictionaries.
SECOND TIME
The second time through the Study Tapes the student listens for the
sense of the sentences.
_________
It is very revealing to do the Primary Rundown in this fashion.
Some students are actually getting meaning out of something heard or
read for the first time in their lives.
_________
No wonder schoolchildren, by test, get more stupid each additional year
of school. This has been established by actual test, that they do. Each
year they just have a higher mountain of misunderstood words!
The Primary Rundown done HONESTLY is quite an adventure in opening up
one's Communication Channels with life!
LRH:mes.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN
The Primary Correction Rundown in HCO B 30 March 72 is the rundown
given in the Department of Personnel Enhancement in the Qualifications
Division.
The PRIMARY RUNDOWN is given in the Tech Division as NORMAL DIVISIONAL
ACTIVITY.
PRIMARY RUNDOWN HGC
1. The student is given any needful case handling or repair if his TA is
high or low in accordance with his state of case.
This is only done if the person's meter is such as to make word
clearing difficult or if the person is in obvious need of case handling.
Aside from TA, "obvious need of case handling" includes a bad OCA or
APA, Drugs and PTS.
If the Student has been on drugs he must be given a Drug Rundown.
If he is PTS he must be handled in Ethics and given a PTS Rundown.
If the student is ill he should be handled by Dianetics.
An R/Sing person should be handled by Expanded Dianetics.
2. WORD CLEARING METHOD 1 is done by normal word clearing procedures in
the HGC either as part of his normal auditing or as a student checksheet.
This is carried to an F/Ning list on the final assessment.
The Word Clearing Correction List is used at the slightest sign of
trouble.
The student must have F/N throughout on the final full assessment of
the WC Corr List if used and the final full WC Method I list and an F/N
VGIs at the examiner for this step to be considered complete.
DEPT OF TRAINING
The student is now qualified to enter training.
3. STUDY TAPES AND STUDENT HAT. The student's first training step may be
either the Study Tapes (or authorized transcript or translated tape but not
notes) or the Student Hat. It will be found that course facilities may be
better employed where a student is allowed to do either as the first step,
so long as he does both one after the other.
(a) The Study Tapes are played first for the words themselves. One may
not just play the tape and list the words and then look them up. This is an
exact action. The only variation of this will come when a full list of
these words is issued in alphabetical order. Each is looked up the first
time it appears on the tape. The word is USED in several sentences. A
grammar such as "English Made Simple" should be to hand. Good BIG
dictionaries should be to hand. And a photographic dictionary or glossary.
The tape is then played through. A Method 4 check is made. If there is any
read that is a true read (not a false surge) on the question, "Was anything
not fully understood?" the word is hunted down and defined. And then the
whole tape has to be done again.
In this way, reel by reel (or chapter by chapter when transcribed), the
Study Tapes are done.
An M4 Meter check is made on the whole tape series.
The person is sent to the Student Examiner.
If there is a flunk of the exam the student goes to Cramming.
(b) The Student Hat is done like the Study Tapes.
Each item (P/L, HCO B etc) in it is read through once, looking up each
word the first time it appears and using it in sentences.
At the end of each item the student is checked with Method 4 as on the
tapes.
And if he misses one word he does the whole item again.
In this way he goes through the whole hat.
Now he reads the whole hat for sense.
Each time an ACTION is called for in an item (demo or clay demo) he
must do that item correctly.
He now reads the whole hat through using a Demo Kit continually as he
goes along.
He is again given an M4 check and if there is no read he goes to the
Student Examiner.
If he fails, he goes to Cramming.
If he passes he may do the Study Tapes if he has not done them or he
having passed those is a product.
THE PRODUCT AT THIS POINT IS A STUDENT WHO KNOWS HOW TO STUDY AND WILL
BE ABLE TO USE WHAT HE STUDIES.
This concludes the Primary Rundown as given in the Tech Division.
The Tech Division does not repair the student.
He can be ordered to Cramming however for the single action of a Word
Clearing Correction List in case errors in Method 4 or Method 3 have been
made or the student has gone beyond the metering ability of a supervisor.
Qual at its option in such cases may order a full Primary Correction
Rundown but must give a Word Clearing Correction List first before
determining this.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 4 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
Establishment Officer Series 14
ETHICS
The normal level of an unhatted Dev-T non-producing org is out ethics.
The reason you see so many heavy ethics actions occurring-or situations
where heavy ethics actions should occur if they aren't-in such an org is
that it has its EXCHANGE flows messed up.
It is important to know this fact as this factor alone can sometimes be
employed to handle persons in the area whose ethics are out.
CRIMINALITY
Unless we want to go on living in a far nowhere some of the facts of
scenes have to be confronted.
An inability to confront evil leads people into disregarding it or
discounting it or not seeing it at all.
Reversely, there can be a type of person who, like an old-time
preacher, sees nothing but evil in everything and, possibly looking into
his own heart for a model, believes all men are evil.
Man, however (as you can read in HCO B 28 Nov 70, C/S Series 22,
"Psychosis"), is basically good. When going upon some evil course he
attempts to restrain himself and caves himself in.
The Chart of Human Evaluation in Science of Survival was right enough.
And such people also can be found by the Oxford Capacity Analysis where the
graph is low and well below a center line on the right.
This sort of thing can be handled of course by auditing but the Est O
does not depend on that to handle his staff's problems.
Criminal actions proceed from such people unless checked by more duress
from without not to do an evil act than they themselves have pressure from
within to do it.
Criminality is in most instances restrained by just such an imbalance
of pressures.
If you have no ethics presence in an org, then criminality shows its
head.
Such people lie rather than be made to confront. They false report-they
even use "PR" which means Public Relations to cover up-and in our slang
talk "PR" means putting up a lot of false reports to serve as a smoke
screen for idleness or bad actions.
Unless you get Ethics in, you will never get Tech in. If you can't get
Tech in you won't get Admin in.
So the lack of Ethics permits the criminal impulse to go unchecked.
Yes, it could be handled with Tech. But to get money you have to have
Admin in.
Unless there is Ethics and ways to get it in, no matter how distasteful
it may seem, you will never get Tech and Admin in.
Of course there is always the element of possible injustice. But this
is provided against. (See HCO PL 24 Feb 72, "Injustice".)
When Ethics is being applied by criminal hands (as happens in some
governments) it can get pretty grim.
But even then Ethics serves as a restraint to just outright slaughter.
Omitting to handle criminality can make one as guilty of the resulting
crimes as if one committed them! So criminality as a factor has to be
handled.
It is standardly handled by the basic Ethics P/Ls and the Ethics
Officer system.
EXCHANGE
The unhatted unproducing staff member, who is not really a criminal or
psychotic, can be made to go criminal.
This joins him to the Criminal ranks.
The Ethics system also applies to him.
However there is something an Est O can do about it that is truly Est O
tech.
This lies in the field of EXCHANGE.
If you recall your Product Clearing, you will see that exchange is
something for something.
Criminal exchange is nothing from the criminal for something from
another.
Whether theft or threat or fraud is used, the criminal think is to get
something without putting out anything. That is obvious.
A staff member can be coaxed into this kind of thinking by
PERMITTING HIM TO RECEIVE WITHOUT HIS CONTRIBUTING.
This unlocks, by the way, an age-old riddle of the philosophers as to
"what is right or wrong".
HONESTY is the road to SANITY. You can prove that and do prove it every
time you make somebody well by "pulling his withholds". The insane are just
one seething mass of overt acts and withholds. And they are very physically
sick people.
When you let somebody be dishonest you are setting him up to become
physically ill and unhappy.
Traditional Sea Org Ethics labeled Non-Compliance as Liability and a
False Report as Doubt. And it's true enough.
When you let a person give nothing for something you are factually
encouraging crime.
Don't be surprised that welfare districts are full of robbery and
murder. People there give nothing for something.
When exchange is out the whole social balance goes out.
Every full scholarship ever given by an org wound up in a messy scene.
When you hire a professional pc who just sits around making do-less
motions while people audit him and contribute to him DO NOT BE SURPRISED IF
HE GETS SICKER AND SICKER.
He is contributing nothing in return and winds up in overwhelm!
Similarly if you actively prevented someone from contributing in return
you could also make him ARC Broken and sick.
It is EXCHANGE which maintains the inflow and outflow that gives a
person space around him and keeps the bank off of him.
There are numbers of ways these flows of Exchange can be unbalanced.
It does not go same out as comes in. Equal amounts are no factor. Who
can measure good will or friendship? Who can actually calculate the value
of saving a being from death in each lifetime? Who can measure the reward
of pride in doing a job well or praise?
For all these things are of different values to different people.
In the material world the person whose Exchange Factor is out may think
he "makes money". Only a government or a counterfeiter "makes money". One
has to produce something to Exchange for money.
Right there the Exchange Factor is out.
If he gives nothing in return for what he gets the money does not
belong to him.
In product clearing many people it was found that some considered their
food, clothing, bed and allowance were not theirs because they produced.
They were theirs "just by being there". This funny "logic" covered up the
fact that these people produced little or nothing on post. Yet they were
the first to howl when not getting expensive (to the org) auditing or
courses or tech!
Thus such a person, not hatted or made to produce, will get ill.
It is interesting that when a person becomes productive his morale
improves.
Reversely it should be rather plain to you that a person who doesn't
produce becomes mentally or physically ill. For his exchange factor is out.
So when you reward a downstat you not only deprive upstats, you also
cave the downstat in!
I don't think Welfare States have anything else in mind!
The riots of the ancient city of Rome were caused by these factors.
There they gave away corn and games to a populace that eventually became so
savage it could only enjoy torture and gruesome death in the arena!
A lot of this exchange imbalance comes from child psychology where the
child is not contributing anything and is not permitted to contribute.
It is this which first overwhelms him with feelings of obligation to
his parents and then bursts out as total revolt in his teens.
Children who are permitted to contribute (not as a cute thing to do but
actually) make non-contributing children of the same age look like raving
maniacs! It is the cruel sadism of modern times to destroy the next
generation this way. Don't think it isn't intended. I have examined the
OCAs of parents who do it!
So if a person is brought up this life with the exchange all awry, the
Est O has his hands full sometimes!
He is dealing with trained-in criminality!
WHAT HE CAN DO
The remedy is rather simple.
First one has to know all about EXCHANGE as covered in the Product
Clearing policy letters.
Then he has to specially clear this up with people who do not produce.
He should get them to work on it as it relates to ALL THEIR DYNAMICS IN
RELATIONSHIP TO EVERY OTHER DYNAMIC.
That means he has to clear up the definitions of dynamics with care and
then have the person draw a big chart (of his own) and say what he gives
the 1st Dynamic and what it gives him. Then what he gives the second
dynamic and what it gives him. And so on up the dynamics.
Now, have him consider "his own second dynamic". What does his second
dynamic give his first dynamic? What does his second dynamic give the
second dynamic and what does it give him?
And so on until you have a network of these exchange arrows, each both
ways.
Somewhere along the way, if your TRs are good and you have his attention
and he is willing to talk to you he will have quite a cognition!
That, if it's a big one is the End Phenomena of it.
And don't be surprised if you see a person now and then change his
physical face shape!
CONDITIONS BY DYNAMICS
An Ethics type "action" can be done by giving the person the conditions
formulas (pages 189, 237, 245, 247, 249 of Vol 0, Basic Staff Hat. HCO PL
14 Mar 68-page 247-gives one the table.)
Method 4 the person on the Table of Conditions and pick up any other
misunderstoods.
Have the person study the formula of each of these Conditions in the
table so that he knows what they are and what the formulas are.
When he has all this now with no misunderstood words you must clear up
the words related to his dynamics I to 8 and what they are.
Now you're ready for the billion dollar question.
Ask him what is his condition on the first dynamic. Have him study the
formulas. Don't buy any glib PR.
Don't evaluate or invalidate. When he's completely sure of what his
condition really is on the first dynamic he will cognite.
Now take up the second dynamic by its parts-sex, family, children. Get
a Condition for each.
Similarly go on up each one of the dynamics until you have a condition
for each one.
Now begin with the first dynamic again. Continue to work this way.
You will be amazed to find he will come out of false high down to low
and back up again on each dynamic.
Somewhere along the line he will start to change markedly.
When you have a person in continual heavy ethics or who is out-ethics
(Ethics bait, we say) and who is floundering around, you can do an S & D on
him and quite often save his future for him.
When you have such a person you do this one first before you do the
Exchange by Dynamics.
In other words, you use this on "Ethics bait" and then when he's come
out of such, you do Exchange by Dynamics on him.
SUMMARY
When all looks black, and you are getting false reports, and the things
said done were not done and what was really being done were overt products
and despite all your work, the stats just won't go up, you still have three
answers:
1. GET IN ETHICS ON THE ORG.
2. GET EXCHANGE DONE ON INDIVIDUALS.
3. GET IN CONDITIONS BY DYNAMICS ON THE ETHICS BAIT.
And after that keep a strong just Division 1 Dept 3.
You'll be amazed!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard [Modified by HCO PL 9 May 74, Prod-Org, Esto and
Older Systems
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reconciled, in the Management Series 1970-1974, page
438.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
ETHICS
(Cancels HCO P/L of 7 Feb 70
"Danger Condition 2nd Formula")
CORRECT DANGER CONDITION
HANDLING
When the correct formula for handling a Danger Condition is not done,
an org or activity or person cannot easily get above that condition
thereafter.
When we had the 2nd Danger Formula apparently it was applied but the
real Danger Formula wasn't. This made some orgs and people remain in or
below Danger and made it very hard for them to get above that state.
A prolonged state of emergency or threats to viability or survival or a
prolonged single-handing will not improve unless the actual Danger Formula
is applied.
DANGER FORMULA
The original formula follows:
1. By-pass (ignore the junior or juniors normally in charge of the
activity and handle
it personally).
2. Handle the situation and any danger in it.
3. Assign the area where it had to be handled a Danger Condition.
4. Handle the personnel by Ethics Investigation and Comm Ev.
5. Reorganize the activity so that the situation does not repeat.
6. Recommend any firm policy that will hereafter detect and/or prevent
the
condition from recurring.
The senior executive present acts and acts according to the formula above.
A Danger Condition is normally assigned when:
1. An emergency condition has continued too long.
2. A statistic plunges downward very steeply.
3. A senior executive suddenly finds himself or herself wearing the hat
of the
activity because it is in trouble.
FIRST DYNAMIC FORMULA
The formula is converted for the 1st dynamic to
1st 1. By-pass habits or normal routines.
1st 2. Handle the situation and any Danger in it.
1st 3. Assign self a Danger Condition.
1st 4. Get in your own personal ethics by finding what you are doing that
is out-ethics
and use self-discipline to correct it and get honest and straight.
1st 5. Reorganize your life so that the dangerous situation is not
continually happening
to you.
1st 6. Formulate and adopt firm policy that will hereafter detect and
prevent the same
situation from continuing to occur.
JUNIOR DANGER FORMULA
Where a Danger Condition is assigned to a junior, request that he or
she or the entire activity write up his or her overts and withholds and any
known out-ethics situation and turn them in at a certain stated time on a
basis that the penalty for them will be lessened but if discovered later
after the deadline it will be doubled.
This done, require that the junior and the staff that had to be by-
passed and whose work had to be done for them or continually corrected,
each one write up and fully execute the FIRST DYNAMIC DANGER FORMULA for
himself personally and turn it in.
ASSESSMENT
If the necessity to by-pass continues or if an area or person did not
comply, use a meter and assess or get assessed the following questionnaire.
THE TROUBLE AREA
QUESTIONNAIRE
__________________________ ______________________ _________________
Person's Name Post Date
To be done on the person by one who can correctly operate a meter.
The list is done by telling the person you are about to ask him some
questions on a meter and then just assess this list for reads.
Mark each read properly.
(a) Are you doing anything dishonest? _________
(b) Are you more interested in something else than your job?
_________
(c) Are you falsely reporting about anything? _________
d) Are you doing something harmful? _________
e) Are you doing little or nothing of value? _________
f) Are you pretending? _________
g) Are you in disagreement with something? _________
h) Do you have overts? _________
i) Are you withholding something? _________
j) Do you know of some out-ethics around you? _________
k) Don't you know what your post product is? _________
I) Are the products of others around you unknown to you? _________
m) Do you have things about your post you don't understand?
_________
n) Do you have words on your post you don't understand? _________
o) Don't you know grammar? _________
p) Is there some reason you are not quite on post? _________
q) Is someone giving you orders you don't understand? _________
r) Are you getting orders from too many places? _________
s) Don't you have a post? _________
t) Don't you know what your post is? _________
u) Have you really not read your hat? _________
v) Are you here for some other reason than you say? _________
w) Were you planning to leave? _________
x) Is your post temporary? _________
y) What about your post purpose? _________
z) Are you in any way misemotional or upset about your post?
_________
aa) Are you actually doing fine? _________
When this has been assessed on a meter one then takes the largest read
or TA blowdown and handles it.
This is done by writing the question letter and the person's answers.
Each question that read is given two-way communication until each
question that read has attained a floating needle.
The form used and the worksheets are placed in the person's folder so
that other handling can be programmed and done as needed.
__________________________________
Operator's Name
Probable
WHY______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
______
____________________________________________________________________________
______
WHY
The above questionnaire can also be used to help find a WHY (it will
not directly find one as the Why has to be rephrased for each individual).
A WHY should always be found for individuals in a Danger Condition.
TROUBLE AREA SHORT FORM
__________________________ ______________________ _________________
Person's Name Post Date
A short form can be done on someone who is an "old hand" and knows
the tune.
SF 1. Out-Ethics? __________
SF 2. Overts? __________
SF 3. Withholds? __________
SF 4. Disagreements? __________
SF 5. False Reports? __________
SF 6. Product Unknown? __________
SF 7. Products of others Unknown? __________
SF 8. Post purpose? __________
SF 9. Situations not understood? __________
SF 10. Misunderstood words? __________
SF 11. Misunderstood grammar? __________
SF 12. Wrong WHY? __________
SF 13. Omitted materials? __________
SF 14. Misemotional? __________
SF 15. False passes? __________
SF 16. Invalidation? __________
SF 17. Wrong Orders? __________
SF 18. Not understood? __________
SF 19. No situation? __________
SF 20. Doing fine really? __________
(Handling is the same as in the long form.)
Probable
WHY______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
______
____________________________________________________________________________
______
___________________________________
Operator
ENDING A DANGER CONDITION When production has again increased the
Danger Condition should be formally ended and an Emergency Condition
assigned and its formula should be followed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 APRIL 1972
A/Courses
(Cancels HCO B 31 July 71 Issue II
Corrected "Solo C/Sing")
URGENT
C/S Series 75
Solo C/S Series 13
PREOTS DON'T C/S
HCO B 31 July 71 Issue II Corrected required PreOTs to C/S their
folders for the next session.
I did not write this HCO B.
Research has proven that a Solo PreOT who is required by any C/S to
write a C/S for his next session can be put into that next session action.
This C/Sing for himself his own next session violates the "continued
session rule" wherein an auditor does not "finish" a session by telling the
pc "the process will be continued in the next session".
This puts the pc into continued sessions and in Solo can put the PreOT
from Solo auditing to self auditing. There is a vast difference between the
two. Solo auditing occurs in session with a meter. Self auditing is out of
session wondering and chewing on bank.
A Solo PreOT must NOT self audit.
He ends the session he has done when he ends session on his worksheet.
He then goes to Examiner and gets his exam. The Examiner sends the
completed Exam form to Solo Admin who puts it in the folder.
The Solo C/S, then, from his study of the folder, does the next C/S for
the PreOT in proper C/S form. This is a diagonal 2 green stripes on the
left-hand corner of the sheet, the PreOT's name and date in black. The C/S
itself is in black pen.
The PreOT takes this C/S and does it in his next session.
In rare instances when the PreOT is going really well, the C/S permits
him to do several sessions. The C/S can tell from Exam forms that all is
well. This MUST carry a notice "Come in at once to the D of P if you cease
to audit or run into trouble. Do this C/S in the next several sessions.
Come in for a new C/S the moment you feel this C/S is complete and are
ready for a new C/S."
When no Exam forms come in the Solo D of P chases the pc up.
If a Solo Exam form is bad the Examiner must mark it "Urgent Attn Solo
C/S." IN RED.
Solo Admin must alert the D of P who chases up the pc.
Tab is kept on ALL Solo pcs on lines by the D of P and if one falls off
lines the
fact must be visible to the Solo D of P who keeps a board on sessions with
all PreOTs' names on it !
The above is the correct C/Sing line.
The worst features of a PreOT doing his own C/Sing are:
1. He is not a trained C/S.
2. Sudden ideas pop up he wants to handle instead of going on and he
gets into an offline action when he should keep going.
3. A PreOT can "rabbit" (run away from the bank) by proposing a C/S that
does not make him confront it.
4. And Last but far from least, a "C/S" by a PreOT is an invitation to
the Solo Case Supervisor to Q and A with it. (Q and A means to just
repeat whatever another says as a lazy way out.)
____________
Pc + Auditor is greater than bank.
In Solo Auditing
C/S + PreOT is greater than bank.
____________
PreOTs do NOT C/S their own folders!
____________
THE PREOT DOES KEEP UP HIS SESSION SUMMARY EACH SESSION.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
Central Orgs Academies
London
Washington (Revised issue of
Los Angeles HCOB 31 Mar 72)
Johannesburg
Denmark
Sydney
SHs
Expanded Dianetics Series 1R
EXPANDED DIANETICS is that branch of Dianetics which uses Dianetics in
special ways for specific purposes.
It is not HSDC Dianetics. Its position on the Grade and Class Chart
would be just above Class IV. Its proper number is Class IVA.
It uses Dianetics to change an Oxford Capacity Analysis (or an American
Personality Analysis) and is run directly against these analysis graphs and
the "Science of Survival Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation".
EXPANDED DIANETICS IS NOT THE SAME AS STANDARD DIANETICS AS IT REQUIRES
SPECIAL TRAINING AND ADVANCED SKILLS.
The HSDC is qualified to run Standard Dianetics. He is not authorized
to run EXPANDED DIANETICS without special training.
DO NOT MIX EXPANDED DIANETICS INTO STANDARD DIANETICS.
It often happens that one technology's skills are mingled with
another's. The result is that neither then work.
Standard Dianetics will go right on producing results.
The main difference between these two branches is that Standard
Dianetics is very general in application. Expanded Dianetics is very
specifically adjusted to the pc.
Some pcs, particularly heavy drug cases, or who have been given
injurious psychiatric treatment or who are physically disabled or who are
chronically ill or who have had trouble running engrams (to name a few)
require a specially adapted technology.
A very good Dianetic and Class IV auditor (preferably HSDC & Class VI)
can be specially trained to run Dianetics against the OCA or the Chart of
Human Evaluation and handle other items of great value to a pc.
STUDY
(Subject to Change)
This training would consist of
1. HSDC
2. STANDARD DIANETIC INTERNE HGC OK TO AUDIT
3. Class 0-IV Academy (or Class VI)
4. PRIMARY CORRECTION RD HCOB 30 Mar 72 if Primary RD not done
5. Full Word Clearer Rating
6. FESing
7. Expanded Dianetic Tapes and HCOBs
8. Programming
9. C/S Folder Study
10. Active Auditing on the skills taught
11. C/Sing Expanded Dianetics.
CERTIFICATE
The Certificate would be HUBBARD GRADUATE DIANETIC SPECIALIST.
The Certificate Level is just above Class IV.
Class IV is required. A Class VI SHSBC may be substituted for Class IV.
CHARGES
Hours of Expanded Dianetics, because of the skills required, should be
at least half again or double as much as Standard Dianetic Auditing or
Lower Grade Auditing.
The cost of the Course would be the same as the HSDC Course and
additional to it plus Interne fees.
PREREQUISITE
HSDC and Dianetic Interneship minimum with a successful period of
Standard Dianetic Auditing as an auditor and is Class IV or VI.
Case gain as a Dianetic pc, and all Lower Grades Triple.
DEVELOPMENT
Neither the Course nor Expanded Dianetic Auditing may be sold by an org
unless the org has an Expanded Dianetic Specialist, to be specific, an
HGDS.
WHEN RELEASED THE COURSE WILL BE TAUGHT IN CENTRAL ORGS (LONDON,
WASHINGTON, LOS ANGELES, JOHANNESBURG, DENMARK AND SYDNEY) AND SHs. IT IS
THE SPECIAL COURSE THE CONTINENTAL CENTRAL ORG TEACHES.
The HCOBs relating to Expanded Dianetics will be released as a part of
this series so that orgs will have them when it comes time for them to
acquire the tapes and teach this course.
In the meanwhile these orgs should be making HSDCs and Class IVs.
PERSONS NOT TRAINED ON IT MAY NOT RUN IT OR USE IT REGARDLESS OF CLASS.
To repeat, Expanded Dianetics does not replace Standard Dianetics or
any other Class and is itself and is used for its own specific purposes on
special cases.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
PTS RD CORRECTION LIST
(Reference HCO B 17 Apr 72,
"C/Sing the PTS Rundown",
C/S Series 76)
This Correction List is assessed and handled after a PTS Rundown has
been done on the pc. It also serves as a checklist of expected actions with
the Rundown.
The handlings are given below the assessing statements in each
instance.
The list is Always Done Method 5 (All assessed then handled).
1. You have been physically ill after auditing. ________
(If this happened after a PTS RD the RD is not complete.
2wc to F/N then find what was incomplete.)
2. You lost the gains achieved in auditing. ________
(Same as 1 above.)
3. You are still in communication with a person or group that does
not like Scientology. ________
(Have HCO handle per P/L 5 Apr 72 or if HCO does not act handle
with D of P or Tech Sec.)
4. You know someone who disagrees with what you are doing. ________
(See 3 above.)
5. You handled the whole situation completely. ________
(If reads, 2wc to F/N.)
6. You only said it was handled. ________
(2wc to F/N, give pc P/L 23 Dec 65 and P/L 5 Apr 72 and
Method 4 WC them and report it to the D of P for further handling.)
7. You don't understand the situation. ________
(See 6 above.)
8. You don't believe there is a situation. ________
(2wc to F/N and probably handling as 6 above. It could be there
is no situation now.)
9. You didn't want to handle it and protested. ________
(2wc to F/N. See 6 above.)
10. It can't be handled anyway. ________
(2wc to F/N and see 6 above.)
11. There was something wrong with the auditing or auditor.
________
(Find what and do L1C, L3B or L4B as indicated.)
12. There was earlier bad auditing. ________
(Wasn't set up. Repair Pgm.)
13. You were given the PTS Rundown in the middle of another
incomplete rundown. ________
(2wc to F/N. Complete the incomplete RD then verify the PTS RD.)
14. You weren't PTS in the first place. ________
(Find out if the pc was connected to SPs or an SP group in actual
fact. Possibly still is but misinterpreting "PTS". If so do 6.)
15. The feelings about the people you were audited on are still
there.
(2wc to F/N. L1C, L4B, L3B as indicated. Complete the RD.)
16. The PTS Rundown was not complete. ________
(2wc to F/N. Sort out Case on PTS RD Addition HCO B 20 Jan 72.)
17. You still feel PTS. ________
(See 16.)
18. You still can't hold onto your auditing gains. ________
(See 16.)
19. You were ill after the RD. ________
(See 16.)
20. You feel more upset than ever. ________
(See 16.)
21. There is still an additional person that wasn't detected.
________
(See 16.)
22. You were told to attest but were still PTS. ________
(See 16.)
23. You decided you were PTS when you weren't. ________
(2wc to F/N. Handle as indicated by Data pc gives.)
24. You said a person was suppressive who really wasn't. ________
(See 23.)
25. There is a situation that has not been disclosed. ________
(2wc to F/N. Get full data. C/S accordingly.)
26. There were lies told. ________
(See 25.)
27. You don't agree about all this. ________
(See 25.)
28. Your condition was really caused by something else. ________
(See 25.)
29. There were misunderstood words. ________
(See 25.)
30. Everything was all right in the first place. ________
(See 25.)
31. There were list errors. ________
(L4B.)
32. There were engram errors. ________
(L3B.)
33. There were auditor errors. ________
(L1C.)
34. You now feel okay. ________
(2wc to F/N.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes.rd
Copyright �1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
C/S Series 76
C/SING A PTS RUNDOWN
References: HCO B 9 Dec 71 PTS Rundown
HCO B 20 Jan 72 PTS Rundown Addition
HCO B 13 Feb 72 PTS RD Additional
Issue II LRH Data
HCO PL 5 Apr 72 PTS Type A Handling
HCO B 16 Apr 72 PTS Correction List
HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76
C/Sing a PTS RD (this HCO B)
Any subsequent issues.
The whole point of a PTS Rundown is to make a person not PTS any
longer.
The point is not to just run some processes. It is to have a person all
right now.
To really understand this rundown, one would have to know what PTS is
in the first place and why one was doing the rundown.
This would apply to the auditor as well as the C/S.
PTS means POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE. It means someone connected to a
person or group opposed to Scientology.
It is a TECHNICAL thing.
It results in illness and rollercoaster and IS the CAUSE of Illness and
rollercoaster.
When you do a PTS RD on a pc CORRECTLY he or she should no longer be
ill or rollercoaster.
BUT THIS INCLUDES THE PERSON HANDLING HIS PTS CONDITION IN THE REAL
UNIVERSE NOT IN JUST HIS BANK.
An auditor and C/S must see that the person is:
(a) Handled properly in HCO or by the D of P if HCO isn't there so
that the person handles the PTS Connection itself. (See HCO PL 5
April 72, "PTS TYPE A HANDLING".)
(b) Do the RD correctly (see reference HCO Bs above).
(c) D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be
sure the person is now all right (not PTS).
(d) Watch the person's folder for any new signs of illness and
rollercoaster and if these occur find out what was missed by
assessing PTS RD CORRECTION LIST. (See HCO B 16 April 72.)
(e) Handling the PTS RD CORR LIST.
(f) Re-interviewing to be sure the person is all right now.
DATA
Anyone handling or auditing or C/Sing PTS cases should have done the
PACK "PTS, SP TECH" Pack I & Pack 2 which are based on HCO PL 31 May 71
which is the CHECKSHEET for available tech and policy on this subject.
To this checksheet (HCO PL 31 May 71) must be added these issues:
HCO B 9 Dec 71 PTS Rundown
HCO B 20 Jan 72 PTS Rundown Addition
HCO B 13 Feb 72 PTS RD Additional
Issue II LRH Data
HCO PL 5 Apr 72 PTS Type A Handling
HCO B 16 Apr 72 PTS Correction List
HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76
C/Sing a PTS RD (this HCO B)
Any subsequent issues.
PTS SITUATIONS
The hardest thing to get across about a PTS situation is that it IS the
reason for continued illness and rollercoaster (loss of gains).
The condition does exist. It is in fact common.
We do have the auditing tech to handle now.
The material has to be applied correctly just like any other material.
The reason we do the rundown is not to do some sessions or sell some
auditing or just explain why the person is like that. We do the rundown so
the person will no longer be PTS.
The (EP) End Phenomenon of the PTS RD is attained when the person is
well and stable.
As a C/S you MUST put a YELLOW TAB marked PTS on a PTS PC Folder that
stays on until the person is NO LONGER PTS.
If you do NOT do this there will be about 25% of your pcs or more that
YOU WILL BE IN CONTINUAL TROUBLE WITH! Because you will be C/Sing auditing
for a person who is PTS, will be ill, will rollercoaster because the person
has NOT been handled to EP on being PTS.
These people, by the way, will tell you, "Oh, I'm not PTS." "But your
father is suing the org." "Oh yes, I know, but it doesn't bother me.
Besides my illness is from something I ate last year. And I rollercoaster
because I don't like the Examiner. But I'm not PTS." The mystery is solved
when you find they haven't a clue what the letters mean or what the
condition is, so give them a copy of HCO PL 5 Apr 72 and let them read it.
If they still want to know more give them HCO PL 23 Dec 65. (Remembering it
has to be Word Cleared Method 4 or he won't have a clue even if he reads
it.)
We are on no campaign to rid the world of suppressives when we are
handling a PTS pc. But facts are facts and tech is tech.
In handling a PTS person as a C/S you are on a borderline of policy
violation unless you make the person do what it says in HCO PL 5 April 72
first. That handles the situation itself. Then you can handle the person
with the PTS Rundown.
It is a great rundown. Like any other it has a standard way of going
about it.
LRH:mes.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright �1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
C/S Series 77
"QUICKIE" DEFINED
The reason an auditor can say he doesn't "quickie a rundown" (and none
ever say they do) is because he has no definition for the word QUICKIE.
The word has been used to designate rundowns that were not completely
and fully done.
It is not a slang word.
In the dictionary you will find "Quickie also quicky: something done or
made in a hurry. Also: a hurriedly planned and executed program (as of
studies)."
What happens in auditing, for instance, is a "Grade Zero Expanded" is
"done" by just doing a single flow to its first F/N.
That is obviously "quickie".
A more subtle one is to do a "PTS Rundown" with no Ethics action to
begin and no check for stability, holding gain and not ill a week or two
after the RD. Only if both these actions were done would one have a
"Complete PTS Rundown" as it would give a PRODUCT = A PC no longer PTS.
So what makes a Quickie "completion" quickie?
Is it length of time? Not necessarily.
Is it fewness of processes? Not necessarily as Power can be done
quickie simply by not hanging on for the EP and only going to F/N.
To define COMPLETE gives us the reverse of Quickie.
"COMPLETE: To make whole, entire or perfect; end after satisfying all
demands or requirements. " A Completion is "the act or action of
completing, becoming complete or making complete".
So "completing" something is not a loose term. It means an exact thing.
"End after satisfying all demands or requirements" does not mean "doing as
little as possible" or "doing what one can call complete without being
detected".
Anything that does not fully satisfy all requirements is QUICKIE.
So "quickie" really means "omitting actions for whatever reason that
would satisfy all demands or requirements and doing something less than
could be achieved".
In short a quickie is not doing all the steps and actions that could be
done to make a perfect whole.
Standard auditing actions required for ages that auditors cleared each
word of each command. Yet when they went quickie they dropped this. When
this was dropped, GAINS ON 75% OF ALL PCS LESSENED OR VANISHED. We are
right
now achieving spectacular wins on pcs just by clearing up commands and
words on all lists. We are finding that these pcs did not recover and NEVER
BEFORE HAD BEEN IN SESSION even though previously "audited" hundreds of
hours.
By omitting an essential action of clearing commands, processing did
not work because the pc never understood the auditing commands!
So quickie action did not save any time, did it? It wasted hundreds of
hours!
Quickie Programs are those which omit essential steps like Vital lists
or 2wcs to get data. FESs for past errors are often omitted.
To slow down the torrent of quickie actions on clearing commands HCO
P/L 4 Apr 72 Issue III "Ethics and Study Tech" has Clause 4 "An auditor
failing to clear each and every word of every command or list used may be
summoned before a Court of Ethics. The charge is OUT TECH."
Ethics has to enter in after Quickie Tech has gotten in. Because
quickie tech is a symptom of out ethics. HCO P/L 3 April 72 (Est O Series
13) "Doing Work" and HCO P/L 4 Apr 72 (Est O Series 14) "Ethics" are vital
know-how where a C/S is faced with Quickie actions-or flubby ones that will
not cure.
Essential Quickie Tech is simply dishonest. Auditors who do it have
their own Ethics out in some way.
To be sure their confront is down.
There are numerous remedies for the quickie impulse. The above
mentioned Policy Letters and plain simple TR 0 are standard remedies. TR 0
properly done and completed itself usually cures it.
Quickie study in '67 and '68 almost destroyed auditing quality. LRH ED
174 Int which really pushes in Study Tech will achieve the primary reason
for quickie-the auditor didn't understand the words himself.
Wherever Quickie tendencies or false stats (the quickest quickie
possible) show up, the above P/Ls had better be gotten into full use fast.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Series 4
(Adds C/S Series 76 to HGDS checksheet)
SUPPRESSED PCS AND PTS TECH
(PTS means Potential Trouble Source which itself means a person
connected to a Suppressive Person.)
As the Dianetic Specialist (HGDS) is often called upon to handle pcs
who are not well, it is vital that he knows all about and can use "PTS
Tech".
All sick persons are PTS.
All pcs who rollercoaster (regularly lose gains) are PTS.
Suppressive persons are themselves PTS to themselves.
If a Dianetic Specialist does not know this, have reality upon it and
use it, he will have loses on pcs he need not have.
There is considerable Administrative Tech connected with this subject
of PTS and there is a special Rundown which handles PTS people.
They get handled if the auditor knows his PTS tech, if he audits well
and if he uses both the auditing and Administrative Tech to handle.
The Administrative Tech requires an interview, usually by the Director
of Processing or Ethics Officer and the person is required to handle the
PTS situation itself before being audited. A check for stability is also
made after being audited on the PTS Rundown.
For this reason, HCO B 17 April 72 and all the checksheet of HCO P/L 31
May 71 must be fully known to the Dianetic Specialist.
HCO B 17 April 72 is also C/S Series 76 so as to be sure that Case
Supervisors handle the Admin and C/Sing correctly.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: mes .rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972
Issue II
Remimeo
C/S Series 78
PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND
WC ERROR CORRECTION
Where untrained Auditors are finding Whys for a Danger Formula, or post
purposes or post products as called for in the Est O System you will get a
certain amount of error and case disturbance. Such upsets also come from
word clearing by incompetent persons.
The C/S should look for these especially when such campaigns are in
progress. He should suspect them as a possibility when a case bogs.
A C/S must be sure all such papers and worksheets get into pc's
folders.
A common repair action is to
1. Do an assessment for type of charge.
2. Handle the charge found by the assessment done.
3. Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by 2wc or
direct handling.
4. Suspect LISTING ERRORS on any Why or purpose or product found
even though no list exists and reconstruct the list and L4B and
handle it.
5. Handle word clearing of any type in or out of session with a
Word Clear Correction List done in session by an Auditor.
6. When word clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn't clean up
suspect he has been thrown into implants which are mostly words or
the words in some engram. As Implants are actually just engrams,
handle it with an L3B.
LISTING
Any item found out of session or by a non-auditor is suspect of being a
Listing and Nulling (L&N) error even though no list was made.
TODAY A CORRECT L&N ITEM MUST BD AND F/N.
So treat such items as you would list errors and try to reconstruct the
list and either confirm the item or locate the real item (may have been
invalidated and suppressed) or extend the list and get the real item.
The real item will BD F/N.
One can establish what the situation is with a post purpose, a Why or a
product or any other such item by doing an L4B.
SELF AUDITING
The commonest reason for self auditing is a wrong or unfound L&N item.
People can go around and self list or self audit trying to get at the right
Why or product or purpose after an error has been made.
REACTION
NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A WRONG
LIST.
Even, rarely, a DIANETIC LIST can produce wrong list reactions. Ask the
pc for his somatics and he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or
attacks the auditor.
ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc come
from out lists.
Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even
illness.
OUT LISTS
Therefore when one gets a sharp change in a case (like lowered tone,
violence, blows, "determination to go on in spite of the supervisor", long
notes from pcs, self C/Sing, etc, etc, the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT LIST.
This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the item was said
to BD F/N.
It can occur in "Coffee shop" (out of session auditing of someone), or
by Est Os or poorly trained or untrained staff members or even in life.
PTS
When such actions as finding items by non-auditors are done on PTS
people the situation can be bad, so one also suspects the person to be PTS
to someone or something.
"PTS" does not communicate well in an assessment question so one says,
"Someone or something is hostile to you" and "You are connected to someone
or something that doesn't agree with Dianetics or Scientology."
REPAIRS
The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a) that such
situations as wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where
untrained people are also using meters and (b) THAT IT IS UP TO THE C/S TO
SUSPECT DETECT AND GET THEM HANDLED IN REGULAR SESSION.
Do not ignore the possible bad influence.
As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a correct answer
to forbid such actions.
It is a correct answer to require all such actions and worksheets
become part of the folder.
One can also persuade the D of T or Qual to gen in the people doing
such actions. And do not ignore the effect such actions can have on cases
and do not neglect to include them in C/Ses before going on with the
regular program.
They can all be repaired.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 APRIL 1972
Issue I
Remimeo
D of P
Auditors C/S Series 79
Ethics
Officers Expanded Dianetics Series 5
PTS INTERVIEWS
(Reference HCO B 17 April 72, C/S Series 76)
Interviews to discover a PTS condition are done on a meter with all
reads marked.
The Interview asks (a) about persons who are hostile or antagonistic to
the pc, (b) about groups that are anti-Scientology, (c) about people who
have harmed the pc, (d) about things that the pc thinks are suppressive to
the pc, (e) about locations that are suppressive to the pc and about past
life things and beings suppressive to the pc.
In doing the Interview the Interviewer must realize that a sick person
is PTS. There are no sick people who are not PTS to someone or a group or
something somewhere.
A somewhat suppressive pc will find the good hats suppressive. This
does not relieve his condition. He is PTS to SP people, groups, things or
locations, no matter how SP he is.
He can have been audited by someone he knew in an earlier life and who
goofed the session. A few auditors have since been declared. Not because
they goofed but because they were SP.
However, some PTS pc will make trouble for good people because that is
what PTS means (Potential Trouble Source). So do not buy all the good
people he is PTS to.
Further, when you do get the person or group or thing or location the
PTS person will F/N VGI and begin to get well.
The PTS condition is actually a problem and a mystery and a withdrawal
so it is sometimes hard to find and has to be specially processed (3 S&Ds)
to locate it.
Usually it is quite visible.
Don't have a sick, rollercoaster pc appear for Interview and then say
"not PTS". It's a false report. It only means the Interviewer did not find
it.
The pc sometimes begins to list in such an Interview and such an
Interview where a wrong item is found has to be audited to complete the
list or find the right item. (See C/S Series 78, HCO B 20 Apr 72, Issue
II.)
So Interview worksheets are VITAL.
The Interview should end on an F/N.
The Interview is followed by the Ethics action of HCO PL 5 April 72 or
other Ethics actions such as handling or disconnection and posting as
called for in policy.
An Interviewer has to use good TRs and operate his meter properly and
know 2-way comm and PTS tech.
Some Interviewers are extremely successful.
Such Interviews and handling count as auditing hours.
When properly done, plus good auditing on the PTS RD, well people
result.
LRH:mes.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[HCO PL 5 April 1972, PTS Type A Handling, referred to on previous page,
was revised and reissued on 20 July 1975 as BPL 5 April 1972R, PTS Type A
Handling.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 APRIL 1972
Remimeo
Study Series 8
THE GLIB STUDENT
The Glib Student can confront the words and ideas.
He cannot confront the physical universe or people around him and so
cannot apply.
He does not see Mest or people.
The reason for this is that he is below non-existence on one or more
dynamics and so cannot align with the others.
As a spirit or being in a body he has no past or future and so is just
a social machine.
Getting him up the dynamics by conditions by "Conditions by Dynamics",
HCO PL 4 April 72 (Establishment Officer Series 14), fourth page, having
him do general confronting and do TR Courses the Hard Way and having him
run on the Objective Processes cures this condition. It takes a lot of
work, a lot of auditing but it can be cured.
Unless it is fully handled he will never see enough more than the paper
and words to be more than a glib student who cannot apply.
LRH:mes.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[A copy of HCO PL 4 April 1972, Ethics, Establishment Officer Series 14, is
on page 78 and "Conditions by Dynamics" is on page 81.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 MAY 1972
Remimeo
Executive
Hats IMPORTANT
Executive Series 12
ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES
Any person holding an Executive Post (head of Department or above) is
deemed an EXECUTIVE.
Evaluation has revealed that the breakdown in many orgs is a failure on
the part of Executives to wear their Ethics and Justice hats.
It has been found that below Administrative Whys there is usually an
Ethics situation as well which unhandled, causes the Administrative Why not
to function or raise stats.
In an area which is downstat, it is the duty of an Executive to
investigate and find any out-ethics situation and get it corrected.
Ethics is a personal thing in relation to a group. Unethical people are
those who do not have Ethics in on themselves personally.
It is the responsibility of the Executive to see to it that persons
under his control and in his area get their personal ethics in and keep
them in.
Dishonesty, false reports, an out-ethics personal life, should be
looked for and by persuasion, should be corrected.
When an Executive sees such things he or she must do all he can to get
the person to get his own Ethics in.
When an area is downstat the Executive must at once suspect an out-
ethics scene with one or more of the personnel and must investigate and
persuade the person to be more honest and ethical and correct the out-
ethics condition found.
If this does not correct and if the person or area remains downstat,
the Executive must declare the person or area in Danger and apply HCO PL 9
Apr 72 "CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING".
The situation, if it does not correct, thereafter becomes a matter of
full group justice with Courts and Comm Evs. Persons whose Ethics have
remained out must be replaced.
The seniors of an Executive are bound to enforce this policy and to use
it on any Executives whose personal ethics are out and who fail to apply
it. It will be found that those who do not apply this policy letter have
themselves certain dishonesties or out-ethics situations.
IT IS VITAL TO ANY ORGANIZATION, TO BE STRONG AND EFFECTIVE, TO BE
ETHICAL.
THE MOST IMPORTANT ZONE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT IN AN ORGANIZATION IS AT OR
NEAR THE TOP.
Ethical failure at the top or just below it can destroy an organization and
make it downstat.
Historical examples are many.
THEREFORE IT IS POLICY THAT AN EXECUTIVE MUST KEEP ETHICS IN ON HIMSELF
AND THOSE BELOW HIM OR BE DISCIPLINED OR COMM EVED AND REMOVED FROM ANY
POST OF AUTHORITY AND SOMEONE FOUND WHO IS HIMSELF ETHICAL AND CAN KEEP
ETHICS IN ON THOSE UNDER HIS AUTHORITY.
The Charge in any such case for a staff member or Executive is FAILURE
TO UPHOLD OR SET AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH ETHICAL STANDARDS.
Such offenses are composed of:
1. DISHONESTY.
2. Use of false statements to cover up a situation.
3. Representing a scene to be different than it actually is to cover up
crimes and escape discipline.
4. Irregular 2D connections and practices.
5. Drug or alcoholic addiction.
6. Encouraging out-ethics.
7. Condoning or failing to effectively handle an out-ethics situation in
self or others as an In Charge, Officer or Executive.
TECHNICAL
People with out-ethics withholds cannot see. This is proven by the
brilliant return of perception of the environment in people audited
effectively and at length on such processes.
Such people also seek to place a false environment there and actually
see a false environment.
People whose Ethics are low will enturbulate and upset a group as they
are seeking to justify their harmful acts against the group. And this leads
to more harmful acts.
Out-ethics people go rapidly into Treason against the group.
A person whose Ethics have been out over a long period goes "out of
valence". They are "not themselves".
Happiness is only attained by those who are HONEST with themselves and
others.
A group prospers only when each member in it has his own personal
ethics in.
Even in a PTS (Potential Trouble Source) person there must have been
out-ethics conduct toward the suppressive personality he or she is
connected with for the person to have become PTS in the first place.
People who are physically ill are PTS and are out-ethics toward the
person or thing they are PTS to!
Thus a group to be happy and well, and for the group to prosper and
endure, its individual members must have their own Ethics in.
It is up to the Executive or Officer to see that this is the case and
to DO the actions necessary to make it come about and the group an Ethical
group.
Exec or Officer's Steps
for Getting In Ethics
on a Staff Member
STEP ONE
Inform the person personally he is in Danger Condition by reason of
acts or omissions, downstats, false reports or absence or 2D or whatever
the circumstances are.
He is in fact IN danger because somebody is going to act sooner or
later to hit him.
He may be involved already in some other assignment of Condition.
But this is between you and him.
HE IS IN DANGER BECAUSE YOU ARE HAVING TO BY-PASS HIM TO GET HIS ETHICS
IN, A THING HE SHOULD DO HIMSELF.
If he cooperates and completes this rundown and it comes out all right
you will help him.
If he doesn't cooperate you will have to use group justice procedures.
This is his chance to get Ethics in on himself with your help before he
really crashes.
When he accepts this fact, Step 1 is done. Go to Step 2.
STEP 2
Ethics is gotten in by definition on the person.
GET IN THE DEFINITIONS FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
The following words must be Method 4 Word Cleared on all the words and
the words in their definitions on the person being handled.
"ETHICS: The study of the general nature of morals (morals [plural]
[noun]: The principles of right and wrong conduct) and the specific moral
choices to be made by the individual in his relationship with others.
"The rules or standards governing the conduct of the members of a
profession."
"JUSTICE: 1. Moral rightness; equity. 2. Honor; fairness. 3. Good
reason. 4. Fair handling; due reward or treatment. 5. The administration
and procedure of the law."
"FALSE: Contrary to fact or truth; without grounds; incorrect. Without
meaning or sincerity; deceiving. Not keeping faith. Treacherous. Resembling
and being identified as a similar or related entity."
"DISHONEST: Disposed to lie, cheat, defraud or deceive."
"PRETENSE: A false reason or excuse. A mere show without reality."
"BETRAY: To be disloyal or faithless to."
"OUT-ETHICS: An action or situation in which an individual is involved
contrary to the ideals and best interests of his group. An act or situation
or relationship contrary to the ethics standards, codes or ideals of the
group or other members of the group. An act of omission or commission by an
individual that could or has reduced the general effectiveness of a group
or its other members. An individual act of omission or commission which
impedes the general well-being of a group or impedes it in achieving its
goals."
Do not go to Step 3 of this until all the above words are cleared by Method
4 Word Clearing.
STEP 3
Ask the person what out-ethics situation he or she is involved in.
It may take the person some time to think of it or he may suppress it
and be afraid to say it for fear of consequences. Reassure him that you are
only trying to help him.
He may have brought it up in a session but did not apply it as out-
ethics. Coax him through this.
If his conduct and actions are poor or downstat, he for sure will be
able to come up with an out-ethics personal scene.
Sometimes the person is secretly PTS and is connected to a suppressive
or antagonistic person or group or thing. In such an instance he will
rollercoaster as a case or on post or have accidents or be ill frequently.
(See PTS tech for material on this and for future handling. Checksheet HCO
PL 9 April 72 [Revised] "Correct Danger Condition Handling", but go on
handling with these steps.)
Sometimes the person just uses PR (brags it up and won't come clean).
In this case, an auditing session is required.
If the person gets involved in self listing get him audited on HCO B 20
Apr 72, C/S Series 78, which gives the auditing session procedure. A person
can become very upset over a wrong item. It is easily repaired but it must
be repaired if this happens.
By your own 2wc or whatever means or repair get this Step 3 to a
clearcut out-ethics situation, clearly stated. Do not forget to go on with
this eventually if there is a delay in completing it. GIs will be in if
correct.
STEP 4
Have the person work out how the out-ethics situation in which he or
she is involved would be a betrayal of the group or make them false to the
group or its ideals.
Do not make the person guilty. Just get them to see it themselves.
When they have seen this clearly and have cognited on it completely go
to next step.
STEP 5
The person is now ready to apply the FIRST DYNAMIC DANGER FORMULA to
himself.
Give him this formula and explain it to him.
FIRST DYNAMIC FORMULA
The formula is converted for the 1st dynamic to:
1st 1. By-pass habits or normal routines.
1st 2. Handle the situation and any danger in it.
1st 3. Assign self a danger condition.
1st 4. Get in your own personal ethics by finding what you are doing
that is out ethics and use self-discipline to correct it and get
honest and straight.
1st 5. Reorganize your life so that the dangerous situation is
not continually happening to you.
1st 6. Formulate and adopt firm policy that will hereafter detect and
prevent the same situation from continuing to occur.
Now usually the person is already involved in another group situation
of downstats or overt products or bad appearance or low conditions, Courts,
Comm Evs for something.
It does not matter what other condition he was in. From you he is in
Danger.
So 1st 1 and 1st 2 above apply to the group situation he finds himself
in.
He has to assign himself a Danger Condition as he recognizes now he has
been in danger from himself.
1st 4 has been begun by this rundown.
It is up to him or her to finish off 1st 4 by applying the material in
Steps 2 and 3. He or she has to use self-discipline to correct his own out-
ethics scene and get it honest and straight, with himself and the group.
1st 5 is obvious. If he doesn't, he will just crash again.
1st 6. In formulating and adopting firm policy he must be sure it
aligns with the group endeavor.
When he has worked all this out AND DEMONSTRATED IT IN LIFE, he has
completed the personal danger rundown.
He can then assign himself Emergency and follow the Emergency Formula
(HCO PL 23 Sept 67, Pg 189-190 Vol 0 OEC, "Emergency").
STEP 6
Review the person and his stats and appearance and personal life.
Satisfy yourself that the steps above and the out-ethics found were all
of it. That no wrong item has been found. That the person is not PTS.
Handle what you find. But if you find that the person did not improve
and gave it all a brush-off, you must now take the group's point of view
and administer group justice.
Your protection of the person is at end because he had his chance and
is apparently one of those people who depend on others to keep his Ethics
in for him and can't keep them in himself. So use group justice procedures
thereafter.
If the person made it and didn't fall on his head and is moving on up
now AS SHOWN BY HONEST STATS AND CONDITION OF HIS POST, you have had a nice
win and things will go much much better.
And that's a win for everybody.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 MAY 1972
Remimeo
HAVINGNESS
(Previously issued as PAB No. 23 on 2 April 1954
through Hubbard Communications Office,
163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11)
Starvation for energy is the keynote of any case which maintains
facsimiles in restimulation.
The thetan who holds facsimiles to the body has chosen to have the
energy in spite of the perceptions and significances in it. He is
attempting to have the energy and not have the aberrative quality of it.
Thus he is posed the problem of trying to reject the thought and accept the
energy and thus he cannot do either.
In Dianetics we gave him the energy by processing out the significances
(perception) in it.
When well exteriorized a thetan may have his energy so far reduced that
he becomes unhappy. Having him create and snap in anchor points upon
himself (not the body) will remedy this unhappiness.
Matched terminalling, admiration processing and any other process which
reduces energy, at length "starve" the thetan for energy.
All these conditions are remedied by remedying the "havingness" of the
thetan.
As we saw in Acceptance Level Processing (PAB 15) only certain energy
forms may be acceptable to the thetan. This is regulated by the screens he
has erected against things. By setting up a resistance to certain energies,
he creates an eventual appetite for them. He sets up screens to resist the
form and the screen becomes plus for the form on the far side and negative
for the form on the near side. As the screen caves in upon him (by being
pounded by the unwanted form) it eventually causes an appetite (vacuum) for
the form. Thus he actually starves for a form he once detested. This is the
dwindling spiral of the Mest Universe. The thetan believes he has to have
the form to survive.
The remedy of havingness is necessary for all cases at and below Step
IV of SOP 8.
An auditor remedies havingness by "starting an avalanche", by making
the preclear begin an automatic inflow of acceptable things, then graduates
the preclear rapidly to avalanches of stars, planets, heavy masses and
spaces.
It is density and mass which count, not specific items.
Degradation begins when the thetan is interiorized into unwanted mass.
It is completed when, having developed an appetite for heavy mass, he is
exteriorized from it.
In this lifetime the downfall of any thetan began with his loss of some
heavy mass. The heaviness of the mass was the value of the mass. For
instance, an auditor wishing to trace the feeling of degradation in a
preclear would look for a time when the preclear lost or was removed from a
massive object. The auditor then has the preclear
mock up the object and change its quality better or worse until it "snaps
in" automatically on the preclear. Then the auditor has the preclear mock
up enough of the object to create an avalanche. The preclear must then add
more and more to the inflow, then add planets, stars and black stars until
the preclear can comfortably throw several dense objects away in mock-up. A
reverse (outflowing) avalanche is then begun and run.
Outflowing and inflowing avalanches are run on the preclear until his
"hunger" is satiated.
Numerous facsimiles may appear. The auditor continues with the dense
masses in avalanches, not the facsimiles. The facsimile will "blow".
This process, run for four or five hours, will create a Book 1 Mest
Clear.
Perceptions are turned on by running "acceptable" smells, lights and
sounds in avalanches. Masses are more important than perceptions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright � 1954, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B is a reissue of PAB No. 23 which can be found in context
in Volume II, page 38.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1972
Remimeo
SIX BASIC PROCESSES
(Previously issued as PAB No. 42 on 24 December
1954 through Hubbard Communications Office,
163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11)
There are six basic processes today in Dianetics and Scientology.
Before we consider these processes, let us first consider the essential
difference between Dianetics and Scientology. What we are doing could be
called, more succinctly, "an understanding of life." Under this heading, we
could call anything a science or an art and we could bring in many
subdivisions.
Other subdivisions which enter into this represent the difference
between a study of life in general and a study of man in particular.
Scientology could be called a study of life; Dianetics could be called a
study of man. The first four dynamics are devoted to Dianetics. If you read
again Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, you will discover
that it treats of the first four dynamics. If you examine the first shadows
of what we now call Scientology, it treats all of the eight dynamics. In
view of the fact that both Dianetics and Scientology operate in the field
of man, it should be readily seen that the basic processes of Dianetics or
Scientology as they apply to man would be the same. Just because we have
used two different words is no reason man has changed. Thus we have our six
basic processes and thus we discover that Dianetics and Scientology, up to
the point of stable exteriorization, operate in exactly the same field with
exactly the same tools. It is only after man is sufficiently exteriorized
to become a spirit that we depart from the field of Dianetics; for here,
considering man as a spirit, we must enter the field of religion. Thus we
have our additional subdivision. Dianetics is a science which applies to
man, a living organism; and Scientology is a religion.
The six basic processes are as follows:
1. Two-way Communication
2. Elementary Straightwire
3. Opening Procedure of 8-C
4. Opening Procedure by Duplication
5. Remedying Havingness
6. Spotting Spots in Space.
An additional breakdown of these sections demonstrates that these
processes subdivide into some highly important techniques. An additional
process is as follows:
1. Two-way Communication includes communication lag, scarcity of
problems, the Code of a Scientologist, the Axioms of Dianetics.
2. Elementary Straightwire includes the Auditor's Code, Self Analysis,
Memory and Mass and their relationship, under which we get past life
loss of memory and what we generally call "next-to-the-last list of
Self Analysis."
3. Opening Procedure of 8-C includes pan-determinism, orders,
defenses and the theory and material pertinent to present time.
4. Opening Procedure by Duplication includes the communication formula,
general theory of ARC and "it must-mustn't happen again."
5. The Remedy of Havingness includes the scale of substitutes, the hide-
to-curiosity scale, Expanded Gita, mock-ups and engrams, overt acts and
motivators, flows and terminals, the fact that two things can't occupy
the same space if one is to have a universe, significances and problems
and, in particular, the scarcity of problems.
6. Spotting Spots includes "space, the theory of," disinterest,
importance, as-isness and the conditions of existence and separateness.
Appended to these subjects is one of equal importance in that it is the
prediction of human beings. This is included, and could be called part
seven of these basics. Science of Survival, with its dissertations on the
Theta-MEST theory, ARC, and the Chart of Human Evaluation, is, indeed, a
study of the prediction of homo sapiens.
It has been discovered in the field of training that an auditor has to
be thoroughly versed in these seven items. He must be able to be expert in
processing people using the six processes, and his understanding must be
increased to the seventh item as included in the book Science of Survival.
How thoroughly does one have to cover any one of these subjects in
order to render an auditor conversant with it? It has been found in the
Phoenix Certification Course that even auditors who have studied this
material before coming to the course had to be rehearsed on it a minimum of
eight times and had to be carefully supervised through each one of these at
least eight times, had to audit at least ten or fifteen hours on each
process under supervision, and had to have each one of these processes run
on him expertly for many hours before he finally was able to practice them
with such skill that he produced uniform results. This is in spite of the
fact that these particular processes are simple. Indeed, they are so simple
that an auditor has a tendency to look at them and use them as though they
were also pliable. Their simplicity is residual in the fact that they are
the exact processes necessary to produce the exact results of Dianetics and
Scientology.
It has been found that the simplicity of these processes was the
stumbling block in their use. One instance in one HCA unit: a class went
through for five weeks without entirely grasping the theory and practice of
communication lag. Amongst this class was an auditor-student who was so
expert at giving indirect, yet seemingly direct, answers that he had
actually evaded the understanding of his fellow students. This person had
yet to give a precisely direct reply to a question asked him. An instructor
sat down with this student and for forty-five minutes asked him the same
simple question. At the end of that time the student gave at last a direct
reply, and this reply was the first time in the course when he had answered
a question straight. A precision definition of communication lag is "the
length of time, whether verbal or silent, intervening between the auditor's
asking of a specific question and the specific and precise answer of that
question by the preclear." It would not matter then whether the preclear
continued to talk about something else than the question, or simply
remained silent, this would still be communication lag. The class had not
entirely grasped this fact in that they assumed that an indirect or an
almost answer was sufficient. Rapidly in the next two auditing periods the
case of the student broke, simply because his auditor now understood
exactly what this person was doing with auditing questions and now demanded
precise answers to questions, at the same time retaining ARC with his
preclear.
The processes of Dianetics, as one can see, stress bringing a preclear into
present time. In the old days we did this by running engrams, running locks
and unsticking the preclear in general from various incidents in the past.
Now we approach the problem far more directly. The Opening Procedure of 8-C
is putting the preclear into contact with what is present time. The Remedy
of Havingness will actually give the preclear
enough energy masses to permit his starved condition to let go of the
energy masses he is holding to him. The energy masses he is holding to him
are commonly engrams with significance and content which make him very
unhappy, but not as unhappy as he thinks he would be if he no longer had
this energy. The motto of an individual seems to be "Any energy, even with
content as vicious as an engram, is better than little or no energy. "
Here, with this list of processes, we have before us the basic training
for the Dianeticist and Scientologist. These processes have now remained
stable for some eight months. In spite of all the attention and tests they
have received, little or no improvement has occurred in the actual form of
the processes, and the processes and the commands have remained steady and
stable.
In view of the fact that the thetan exterior is described fully in the
second chapter of Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, and in
view of the fact that we have now with the command "Be three feet back of
your head" the "one-shot clear," and in view of the fact that the
instructor in London with his Advanced Clinical Course [1st London ACC]
only three weeks deep had exteriorized successfully all of his students, we
see we do not have any real problems in terms of processing or processes
today. We can do it. An auditor who is well trained can achieve results
with these basic processes which in any other age would be called miracles.
There are people around who desperately need it as a process who
believe and who would have you believe that the Opening Procedure by
Duplication techniques are the most vicious things ever invented. Compare
this with the fact that these people also feel bound to go out and crusade
amongst their fellow men to teach them how bad Dianetics and Scientology
are. These two facts combined should tell you something concerning
duplication. The very thought of duplication is so hideous to some people
that they are utterly unwilling to face the slightest chance that they
might be brought in to a willingness to duplicate. These people have had
things happen to them which are bad enough to make these people postulate
that certain things mustn't happen again. Duplication means that things
must happen again and the process of duplication itself balances out and
makes a person easy about his past.
In the process of running Opening Procedure by Duplication hypnotism
very often comes off of the bank. Here we have an example of unhypnotizing.
The process of hypnotism is a monotony and a central fixation on some one
object. Opening Procedure by Duplication, using two objects and using an
alert and aware procedure, contacting and examining these two objects
alternately, tends to unfix a person from points in the past. Naturally,
this begins to run out hypnotism. A person run for only 15 or 20 minutes on
Opening Procedure by Duplication might very well feel himself getting more
and more hypnotized; by the time he has been run 45 minutes or an hour,
this sensation has worn away and the person is far more alert than he was
at the beginning of the session. It is quite common to run Opening
Procedure by Duplication for several hours, and Intensive Procedure as
given at headquarters of the HASI is run precisely as given and taught upon
preclears for a minimum of five hours before the HASI is content to release
a preclear as in good condition. If the preclear cannot duplicate, his
arrival at a state of good condition will simply be a signal for him to
have a "no duplicate" fixation on feeling good. Thus the auditor would have
brought him up to a level of feeling well and immediately afterwards the
individual, being able to have things happen only once, would then have to
feel bad. Here again is the problem of exteriorization which results soon
afterwards in re-interiorization: the person has exteriorized, he has the
fixation that something must happen only once, and thus he will go back
into the body and will not come out again. This is all under the heading of
duplication. Opening Procedure by Duplication wakes up the preclear, puts
his body back into balance and gives him a brighter outlook in general and
makes him fear the past much less than before it has been run on him. He is
far better able to control his body and his environment than previously and
remarks that incidents have far less effect upon him than before. This does
not look very much like hypnotism, now, does it?
With these processes a trained auditor-and we emphasize trained-is able to
get the results which are called for and described in all the earlier books
on Dianetics and Scientology. The reason one did not see these results more
often was that the auditor himself could not duplicate the auditing
commands, and thus anything and everything was being run but a minimum of
result was taking place. I was running one preclear one day who was a very
old-timer and who had been run many, many hours on the techniques contained
in Dianetics. The Modern Science of Mental Health. I was running him on
processes which ran out all of his earlier auditing. He broke down under
this processing and began to curse, saying, "If only once-if only just once-
I had been permitted to run a second time through an engram by my auditor;
if only just once I had been able to run the secondary once more! But no! I
was never given the chance to go through the engram a second time." Now
those of you who know the techniques of Book One know definitely they call
for a continuous running through, over and over, of the same incident so as
to de-intensify it. This is the sort of complicated duplication which the
preclear was asked to do which resolved at once his ability to duplicate
and the fact that it mustn't happen again. Thus when auditors failed to
return people through engrams and secondaries, for a second, fourth, fifth,
or even tenth time if necessary, it then became impossible for these early
techniques to work.
In training it is very difficult to relay the theory and processes to
people who are not very alert and who cannot duplicate. One can say
straight to a class that such-and so is observably true, and the class will
immediately agree that something is observably true, but immediately after
leaving the classroom, will believe in themselves that an entirely
different statement had been made than the one they agreed with. They will
then agree with this different statement and all sorts of oddities in the
form of theory and techniques become circulated.
In the next Professional Auditor's Bulletin I am going to give you a
rather thorough rundown on two-way communication and on the bulletins
subsequent to that I am going to give you, for the first time, in written
form, a considerable dissertation on these processes and the exact auditing
commands and the results to be looked for.
But there is one thing I am probably not going to cover again, and this
is an odd fact which has shown up in our training experience here and in my
handling of a great many auditors. This has to do with the case of the
auditor in particular. I could write an entire series of PABs on this
subject, but I am sure this statement will be enough. The case of an
auditor, one who is skilled in the processes of Dianetics and Scientology,
and the case of a preclear, one who has just walked in off the street
without further knowledge, are entirely different cases, as both
Dianeticists and Scientologists know. At one time the cases of
Scientologists and Dianeticists were considered so much with horror on the
part of other Scientologists and Dianeticists that one audited a fellow
practitioner with considerable reluctance. Dianeticists and Scientologists
were renowned to be tough cases.
I have found now what made them tough cases. The preclear has an
entirely different goal from the auditor. The preclear is there to get
well: the auditor is there to make the preclear well.
When we consider this further, we see that the ability of the auditor
to control minds and mental reactions is dependent upon his getting results
in preclears. The preclear's results simply stem from the preclear's gained
ability to control his own mind and its reactions. Thus, of course, we have
entirely different values.
An auditor who does not consistently get good results is going to have
his own case cave in on him. The only way an auditor can keep his case up
is to get continuous and predictably excellent results upon preclears. Thus
an auditor, to have his case in good order, would have to be in good order
as an auditor; he would have to be able to get results upon those he
processed. In view of the fact that he could get results upon other human
beings, he could then, of course, know continuously that he could control
human reactions and mental reactions; and so, with this confidence and this
control, be completely unworried about his own case and be able to do
actually anything he wished with his own mental machinery.
The case of the auditor actually depends upon his successes in auditing.
Thus in the Certification Course in Phoenix we stress today only the skill
of an individual to audit, and we discover consequently that, as the
auditor gets results upon his fellow student and as he gets results on
outside preclears, his own belief in his ability to handle the human mind
soars to such an extent that as a case he ceases to be in the concern
category. He of course is audited and without being audited he would not
know the results which would happen in a preclear, but his actual case
gains depend on his gains on preclears.
Now with today's techniques we can guarantee those results on
preclears. We can demonstrate to any auditor that he can make anybody well,
if the person is even vaguely breathing, simply by using with skill and
understanding, as trained, the above six processes and the seventh, which
is actually an understanding. Here is the problem of the auditor's case
resolved. The way to have one's case in excellent condition is to have
continuing confidence in one's ability to get results on preclears. In the
Certification Courses in Phoenix and London we work solely in the direction
of giving an auditor confidence in his ability to handle the aberrations of
others and we discover that with this gained confidence the fear of his own
behavior vanishes; and thus an auditor becomes a very, very capable clear.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright � 1954, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B is a reissue of PAB No. 42 which can be found in context
in Volume II, page 118.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MAY 1972R
REVISED 17 JANUARY 1973
Remimeo
Exp Dn Cse
THE REMEDY OF HAVINGNESS
(Previously issued as PAB No. 49 on 1 April 1955
through Hubbard Communications Office,
163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11)
(Addition in this type style on next page.
Note that this also corrects Page 20 of the
''Level 1 PABs" booklet.)
There is a great deal of upper-echelon theory connected with the Remedy
of Havingness as a process, for here we are dealing with energy and the
reasons and operations of a thetan in regard to it.
Just why a thetan should get himself so completely snarled up in energy
might be an entire mystery to anyone who did not realize that a thetan has
to cut down his knowingness and his total presence in order to have a game.
The awareness of awareness unit builds space to cut down knowingness. Space
makes it necessary, then, to look at something in order to know about it.
The next thing a thetan does to cut down his knowingness is to create
energy and to pass it to other thetans and to bring in the energy of other
thetans so as to get a duration and a time span. If the thetan is
successful and obtains a game in this wise, he continues on with this modus
operandi of having a game, and when he does not have a game he simply cuts
his knowingness down once more. Of course, he reaches a point eventually
where he does not get a game simply by cutting down his knowingness, and
eventually assumes a fairly fixed, stupid, aspect. He is below the level of
having games, but because he has cut down his knowingness he does not know,
now, that he is below the level of having games and thinks that all that is
necessary to get another game is to further cut down his knowingness. He is
by this time obsessively dramatizing the lowering of knowingness.
When one speaks of knowingness, one should realize that one is speaking
of an embracive thing. Everything on the Know to Mystery Scale is simply a
greater condensation or reduction of knowingness. At first one simply
knows. Then he makes some space and some energy, and so now he has
knowingness in terms of looking. By changing the position of the particles
of energy thus created, and by exchanging particles with others, extant or
self-created, the thetan cuts down his knowingness further, and gets time,
and so gets emotion and sensation. When these become solid, he has effort
particles and masses. Now, he could cut down his knowingness further by
refusing to use emotion and effort, but by thinking about them thus
introducing new VIAs into his line of knowingness. And, when he no longer
knows entirely by thinking, he ceases to create knowingness and begins to
eat, and from eating he drops into the ready-made sensation of sex instead
of knowing what happens in the future. And from here he drops down into
postulated mystery as something one cannot possibly know about. In other
words, one gets a continued reduction of knowingness in order to have
games. The greatest chess player in the world has no game, since he can
predict that he will win and predict everything that opponents will do, so
he will simply demonstrate how to play chess. Sooner or later, he will
announce that he is "burned out" or has lost his knack for playing chess,
and will go off into some other field where he can have a game. The field
he will choose will be a less wisdom-demanding field than playing chess. A
boxer, such as some of the very great ones of the past, will reduce his
timing, which is to say his knowingness of arrival, to a point where he can
at least put on a good exhibition, and from this they will further reduce
their knowingness, and then not noticing how far they have gone, get
themselves thoroughly and consistently beaten. There will be a period,
however, when they are fairly evenly matched against their opponents.
To understand this with any thoroughness, one would have to recognize the
intention back of all communication. Creation, Survival, and Destruction is
knowingness. When somebody talks to you his intention is to continue in a
parity where he can have an interchange of communication, which is to say a
game. He takes knowingness from you, and gives knowingness to you, with one
form of communication or another. Two soldiers fighting and shooting at
each other are using a bullet to make the other man know. What is there to
know in this situation? That one is dead, of course, and for the victor,
that one has won.
It is dangerous, alike, to a thetan, to have too many wins or too many
losses. Give him too many wins, and he will correct in the direction of
reducing his knowingness as represented by his dexterity, his prediction,
his activity. Give him too many losses and he will seek another game, even
to the point where he will die and pick up another body. Because the
decision is on the basis of knowingness, the decision is always downward.
One does not decide upward toward greater knowingness, actually, unless one
has the full and complete intention of winning in a new game. If one
discovers that there are no wins or losses either to be found in this new
game, one will reduce one's own knowingness, even to the point of
forgetting all of his knowledge concerning it, in order to ensure a game.
As there is not an infinity of games in progress, one is apt, as he
comes down seventy-four trillion years of track, to play out the available
games and to put them in the category of "it must not happen again." One
then becomes bored. One is only bored when there is no game possible, from
his viewpoint. Actually, all he has to do is become enthusiastic about the
game on his own consideration and he will begin to know more about it
again.
A thetan considers that some form or mass is necessary in order to have
a game. He gets into the belief that he cannot create new masses, and so he
begins to hold on to old masses, and here, whether he is exteriorized or in
a body, we find him holding on hard to old facsimiles, old significances,
old decisions, rather than taking on new decisions.
The Remedy of Havingness directly addresses the problems of giving the
thetan something "to play with." When he discovers that he can have new
masses, he will begin to let go of old masses. It is an easily observed
phenomenon while having a preclear Remedy Havingness, that old engrams go
into restimulation, go into restimulation and run out, that they show up in
front of his face and suddenly explode or disappear. The Remedy of
Havingness actively does run out engrams.
This process is used from boredom up to conservatism for its best
results.
This process is done by asking the preclear to mock up something and
pull it in, or mock up something and throw it away. When a thetan is
exteriorized, if you want to see him get very unhappy, make him change
space until he begins to lose all the energy he is holding on to, and then
fail to remedy his havingness. The thetan will become convinced that he is
only a thought, and is therefore, by his standards, unable to have a game.
Tell him to mock up eight anchor points in the form of the corners of a
cube around him and pull them in upon himself. Ask him to do it several
more times, and he immediately brightens up and becomes very happy. Why is
this? You have reassured him that he can have a game.
The cutting down of knowingness and the Remedy of Havingness have
opposite vectors. The Remedy of Havingness will knock out old energy masses
the thetan is holding on to, or that the body is holding on to, which tell
the thetan he is stupid. The supplanting of these by new energy masses
which do not have the postulate of cutdown knowingness in them of course
makes the thetan brighter.
When you find a theory detached from a process and not demonstrating
itself in a process, there must be something wrong with the theory.
Similarly, if what I say here about condensed knowingness being all other
things, and the cut-down of knowingness, were not demonstrated in the
process of Remedy of Havingness, then we would have to get ourselves a new
theory. However, this is demonstrated very definitely. Those people who
cannot remedy havingness, wherever they are on the tone scale, can be
brought to a point where they will remedy havingness simply by asking them
what they wouldn't mind knowing. The consideration of what they are willing
to know then begins to rise.
If you only could see a Black Five operate you would see that his
barriers are all erected toward knowing something. Of course he is very
afraid of being told something bad, and so doesn't want to be told anything
at all, and when the auditor gives him a command he never receives the
command as given, but does something else. He has a block up against
knowingness to such a degree that he will eventually permit himself to be
pressed into complete inactive stupidity. What are those black screens for?
Basically to keep him from knowing. Knowing what? Then one will have to
look closely at the definition of a datum. A datum is an invention which
has become agreed upon and so solidified. In other words, a datum is to
some degree a solidity, even if it is merely a symbol. To get into this
state it has to be agreed upon. When it is thoroughly agreed upon it
becomes, then, a truth. It is not at all a truth. It is an invention. What
made it sure or what made it real was the fact that it was agreed upon.
This opens the doors further to other processes.
In order to get the preclear in good condition we would have to put him
into some kind of a condition so that he could create. The first thing he
is liable to be able to create in auditing is a lie. The word "lie" is
simply "invention with a bad connotation." Society gives invention that
connotation because of its anxiety to have a game and to agree, and so be
able to communicate with one another.
Thus society frowns upon the invention of facts, yet the preclear's
sanity and continued happiness absolutely depend upon his ability to create
new facts. The technique which remedies this is included in "The Creation
of Sanity," number R2-29: "Start lying." One can vary this auditing command
with "Tell me some lies about your past," and then keep the preclear at it
long enough so that the preclear is able to come out of the complete blur
which will follow on the heels of his taking over the function of and
running of his memory machines. The invention of data is a step immediately
toward the remedy of havingness. Simply asking the preclear what he
wouldn't mind knowing, what he wouldn't mind having other people knowing
about him will bring him into a condition where he can mock up and remedy
havingness.
The Remedy of Havingness is the companion process to Spotting Spots,
which will be taken up in the next PAB. The Remedy of Havingness, simply as
a process by itself, if worked up to by getting the preclear willing to
know things, and willing for other people to know things, and run
thoroughly so that whole avalanches of masses can pour into him or pour out
of him, will actually run out an entire engram bank, and thus is an
extremely valuable process.
It has been reported by several auditors that exteriorization was
accomplished on preclears by making them remedy havingness and do nothing
else for eight or ten hours.
The auditing commands for the Remedy of Havingness are: "Mock up
something," "Pull it in," until the preclear is doing this easily. Then,
"Mock up something," "Throw it away," until the preclear can do this
easily. The significance of the object may be added by the auditor with
"Pull in an ideal body," or some such thing, but the actual fact is that
the actual significance does nothing for the preclear. It is the mass which
counts. The auditor can have the preclear pull things in two at a time, six
at a time. He can have the preclear mock up something, copy it a dozen
times, one time after another, then pull in the whole mass, but the real
reason he is doing this with the preclear should never drop from sight. The
auditor is remedying havingness in order to give the preclear enough mass
to permit him to discard old masses which he is holding on to and doesn't
know anything about.
LRH :sb.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1955, 1972, 1973 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
["The Creation of Sanity" referred to above is now known as The Creation of
Human Ability. This HCO B is a reissue of PAB No. 49 which can be found in
context in Volume 11, page 176.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MAY 1972
Remimeo
REMEDY OF HAVINGNESS-THE PROCESS
(Previously issued as PAB No. 50,15 April 1955)
"When in doubt, remedy havingness."
This is a motto which can well be followed by an auditor doing any
process on any preclear.
But, if there is a process which one should do with any other process,
then that process should be understood thoroughly, for if done incorrectly
it would be likely to produce confusion into all the other processes of
Dianetics and Scientology.
Therefore, in the first place, let us examine with rigor the name of
this process. It is REMEDY OF HAVINGNESS. By "remedy" one means the
correction of any aberrated condition. By "havingness" one means mass or
objects. The process could also be called "Remedy of Un-Havingness." It
could also be called "Remedy of Acceptingness." It could also be called
"Remedy of Rejectingness."
To those people who are deficient in havingness, the process is liable
to mean that the auditor should increase the havingness of the preclear.
Such an auditor with this misunderstanding would have the preclear put up
large masses and push them into his body or himself. The auditor would
neglect having the preclear throw away objects and masses.
If the auditor misunderstood the process and simply assumed that it had
something to do with havingness, and if his own havingness were too great,
he would be likely to specialize on all preclears by having the preclear
throw things away.
Actually, the auditor should have the preclear push things into himself
and his body and throw things away from himself and his body until the
preclear can do both with equal ease. When this has been accomplished the
preclear's havingness has been "remedied . "
What, then, does a Remedy of Havingness mean? It means the remedy of a
preclear's native ability to acquire things at will and reject them at
will. Amongst the havingnesses which would require remedy would be an
obsessive inflow of money, sexual objects, troubles, somatics, and
difficulties in general. Whenever one of these appeared in the preclear's
environment it would have a tendency to inflow on the preclear. The reverse
difficulty would be an obsessive outflow, whereby the preclear threw away
or wasted anything which he had, such as money, clothes, cars, or living
quarters. When the process "Remedy of Havingness" has been done thoroughly
and completely, the preclear should be able to reject or accept, at his own
discretion, anything in his environment as well as anything in his engram
bank.
The earliest use of this process is to be found in GITA, which is to
say "Give and Take Processing," one of the early SOPs which became an SOP-8
"Expanded GITA." In Issue 16-G of the Journal of Scientology we have a long
list of key items. The preclear was asked to waste, accept, and desire
these items at will. This was the Desire-Enforcement-Inhibit Scale, or the
DEI Scale. This process is the immediate ancestor of the Remedy of
Havingness. Indeed, one could do far worse than to take the DEI Expanded
GITA list as given in Issue 16-G, and in the form of mock-ups use it as
such upon the preclear, or more modernly employ it directly on the Remedy
of Havingness on these objects.
If one were to employ such a list in the Remedy of Havingness, one would,
of course, have to employ gradient scales. The use of the gradient scale
has never been discarded, and the concept and principle of doing things by
gradient scales is inherent in auditing itself, for one starts with a
process which the preclear can do, and gives him some wins, and on a
gradual scale gives him larger and larger wins until he is cleared.
Similarly, in remedying havingness, the preclear must be started at the
lowest end of the scale and advanced on up to the higher end of the scale.
Quantity is one of the methods of doing this. At first one can ask a
preclear to mock up one of an item and shove it into his body or throw it
away, and then go, finally, when he is doing that well, to two items,
three, four, five, and six, all the same, but a greater quantity of the
item. An even lower gradient on this scale would be to simply get the idea
that something was there, and to progress on forward with the idea into the
actual mass. An expert auditor working with this from the idea on through
to the object would discover that he had no preclears who could not mock
up.
He would have the preclear get the idea out in front of him of a ball,
and get the idea of the ball being thrown away; get the idea of a ball up
in front of him and get the idea of a ball coming in; he would then, when
the preclear could do this excellently well, move forward into the actual
mock-up of a ball. The mock-up would get better and better as the process
progressed, until at last the preclear could mock up and throw away or push
into his body at will, a ball. He would be able to see this ball, even feel
its texture and its weight.
Now, Exteriorization by Remedy of Havingness is a newer process than
the old Remedy of Havingness. It is accomplished by having the preclear
SHOVE or PUSH things into his body. One no longer has the preclear PULL
things into his body. Simply by having the preclear mock up things and
shove them into his body, mock up things and throw them away, mock up
things and shove them into his body, mock up things and throw them away, a
preclear who has already been run on the earlier steps of the six basic
processes will, at this stage, exteriorize quite neatly after as little as
fifteen or twenty minutes of the process. If he does not, then the earlier
processes have been skimped and the preclear was really not ready for a
full, forthright remedy of havingness.
Even when doing Route 1, the preclear is told to push things into
himself. This will rather take his flitter away for a moment, for he is
there being one viewpoint, and in order to push something into himself he
has to be a second viewpoint. In view of the fact that a thetan gets in
trouble by being only one viewpoint, this remedies the viewpoint scarcity
of the thetan, and he pushes himself up into two viewpoints with great
rapidity. Thus we are doing duplication of the thetan at the same time that
we are remedying havingness, so one even has the thetan shove things into
himself, rather than pull things into himself.
In short, one never has anyone pull things into his body any more. One
has a person push things into his body. One has him, for instance, mock up
a planet, and push it into the body; mock up a planet and throw it away;
mock up a planet and push it into his body; mock up a planet and throw it
away; mock up a planet and push it into his body, and then one says, "Where
are you pushing it in from?" The preclear says, "Out here in front of the
body." The auditor simply goes on doing the process and very shortly the
preclear will, if the earlier steps have been done well-the Six Basic
Processes below Remedy of Havingness, exteriorize neatly and will be ready
for Route 1.
One would omit, in such an instance, running Spotting Spots as such,
for Change of Space Processing and Communication Processing have a great
deal to do with spotting spots already.
If you were to do Remedy of Havingness forthrightly and all-out, and
you were to accept this as the only process we had, we would work with its
cousin process, R2-63 as given in The Creation of Human Ability, "Accept-
Reject." One would ask the preclear for things he could accept, one after
the other, until the communication lag was flat, and then would ask the
preclear for things he could reject, one after the other,
until the communication lag was flat on that. One would then move into the
Expanded GITA list and would have the preclear mock up and shove into his
body (if interiorized) or into himself (if exteriorized) the various items
on the Expanded GITA list as given in Issue 16-G of the Journal of
Scientology. This would be a long process, and not entirely successful on
all counts, but would nevertheless be a very effective and efficient
process from the standpoint of gains. One would certainly get the preclear
over a very large number of aberrations and would do a great deal for him.
However, this is not the advised way of handling this process, for the
process itself is not an end-all. Aberrations can be handled much more
easily by communication processing.
The exact use and commands of Remedy of Havingness in ordinary and
routine auditing are simple and effective. One has been asking a preclear a
great many questions which "as-ised" large masses of energy. One, in
handling Change of Space or interiorization and exteriorization into
objects while the preclear is exteriorized, has been "burning up" a great
deal of energy. Any time the preclear begins to feel dopey or "boil off" he
has either run too long on a flow in one direction, in which case reverse
the flow, or he has simply reduced his havingness down to a point where he
feels tired or sleepy. Without waiting for this manifestation to occur the
good auditor simply in the course of Straight Wire or Description
Processing, or many other processes, such as those contained in Route 1,
remedies havingness. Having achieved something like a momentarily flat
communication lag on a process, the auditor says to the preclear, "Mock up
a mass out in front of you." When the preclear has done this, the auditor
says, "Shove it into your body." When the preclear has done so, the auditor
says, "Mock up another mass out in front of you." And when the preclear has
done so, the auditor says, "Throw it away." That, as given, is for
preclears who are interiorized. It is simply repeated over and over. The
mass is not specified. It can be almost anything, and in fact it does not
much matter what type of significance the mass has. Any mass is better than
no mass, according to the thetan.
If the preclear is exteriorized, the auditor already starts him on the
Remedy of Havingness in the Route 1 step where the preclear is asked to
copy what he is looking at (R1-5). When one is doing R1-5, one must be very
careful to obey the gradient scale principle behind Remedy of Havingness.
One would not make the preclear make twenty copies and then push them all
into himself or the body. One would make the preclear make two or three
copies and push them in one at a time until the preclear could remedy his
havingness with ease.
The auditor would then have the preclear "Mock up a mass and shove it
into yourself," and then "Mock up a mass and throw it away," and do this
back and forth until the preclear could do this easily and well, at which
time the auditor would tell the preclear, "Mock up two masses and shove
them into yourself," and then "Mock up two masses and throw them away,"
until finally the auditor has the preclear mock up eight masses as though
they were the corners of a cube around the preclear and "Shove them into
yourself," and then "Mock up eight masses and throw them away."
One must remember that in spite of the fact that he cannot duplicate
mass actually as himself, having no space or mass, natively, the motto of
the thetan is "anything is better than nothing." When you tear up a lot of
facsimiles for a thetan and throw them away, he becomes very unhappy unless
you have him reconstruct those facsimiles or remedy the mass he has lost
accordingly. When you are having a thetan go into and out of MEST universe
masses, a certain amount of energy is burned up, and after the thetan has
been run for a short time on this step (R1-9 in The Creation of Human
Ability), you must be particularly careful to remedy his havingness with
eight masses shoved into himself and eight masses thrown away several
times. A thetan who has been run a great deal without Remedy of Havingness
comes to what is to him a horrible thought: "I am just a concept," and will
sag in tone. He does not come to this state as long as havingness is
consistently remedied.
It may be, as one looks at Scientology, that one has come to the
opinion, watching Remedy of Havingness work, that all there is to anything
is the Remedy of Havingness, that it is all based on the Remedy of
Havingness. If one has a preclear shove enough havingness into his body he
will exteriorize in most cases. If one
remedies enough havingness while the thetan is chasing around the universe,
as in the Grand Tour, the thetan will discover and as-is a great many
communication lines which otherwise might be very detrimental. However, it
is not true that havingness is the entire key to the human mind. Havingness
is the "gimmick" or "weenie" for which the game is played, and having
something is very much like winning.
Above havingness there is doingness, and above doingness there is
beingness, and above beingness there is communicatingness, and above
communicatingness there is knowingness, and above knowingness there is
postulatingness, and so we see we have a long way to go above havingness in
order to get to the top activity of a thetan, which is making postulates,
or unmaking them.
One could, of course, rationalize each and every action of the thetan
with regard to havingness. One could even extend havingness to space,
although it normally refers to objects. One could do all manner of
interesting things with havingness. One could get as specific and as
significant as one likes, or as un-significant as one likes, and still find
Remedy of Havingness working, but we do not have here in Remedy of
Havingness the total clue, the total key. But we do have a process and an
item which must not be overlooked in auditing.
In the Six Basic Processes the Remedy of Havingness comes after the
Opening Procedure by Duplication as a process, itself, but remember that
Remedy of Havingness is done and can be done at any time during any of the
processes as long as the preclear is even vaguely in communication with the
auditor. It does not matter how vague the mass is that the preclear is
using to remedy his havingness. Here is a place where certainty is not
necessary. An unreal, vague, or flimsy mass, if this is all the preclear
can get, will still remedy his havingness.
A case comes to mind out of the Advanced Clinical Course where a
student was unwilling, after his second day, to continue his studies. He
did not believe that he could stand the "hammer and pound," as he put it,
of the terrifically intense schedule. I took him into my office, asked him
what he was doing in life, and he replied to me that he was a machinist.
Also, it seemed to turn out that he had had something to do with a ship
which had sunk under him, although his recollection of this was very
unclear. I asked him what kind of a machine he had customarily run, and he
told me. Then I had him mock up this machine, and remedy his havingness
with it. Then I had him mock up the ship and remedy his havingness with
that, just as given above. I did this for about fifteen minutes, and enough
change occurred in his case to entirely return his confidence in his
ability to stand up to the course and to audit. Yet the mock-ups he was
getting were so thin that he could barely vaguely discern them at all.
Mock-ups get unreal because the thetan is not-ising existence. He is
trying to destroy masses by saying that they do not exist, that they are
not real. He is so bent upon this system of destruction that he is making
everything unreal or black. One of the cures for this is End of Cycle
Processing run in the following fashion:
One has the preclear mock himself up dead (no matter how unreal this
mock-up is), then have the mock-up waste away to bone, and have the bones
waste away to dust, and then have the preclear shove the dust into himself
or, alternately, throw it away. One once more has the preclear mock himself
up dead, have the mock-up waste away to bone, have the bones waste away to
dust, and then have the preclear remedy his havingness with the dust. One
continues this for two or three hours with the preclear if one really
wishes the case to make a change. Where a preclear is getting no reality on
mock-ups or blackness, he is most commonly stuck in that ParaScientological
thing, that thing horribly abhorred by psychologists who have become
Dianeticists, or by people who are just plain scared: a past death. If you
wanted to convince somebody that past deaths exist, you would run End of
Cycle Processing on them. This is a cousin process to the Remedy of
Havingness. One could go a very long distance with this process and have
the preclear mock up his mother dead, have her waste away to bones, and
remedy havingness with the dust, or do this with the dust, or do this with
the father or brothers, or grandparents, with a considerable change in the
case.
This End of Cycle Processing, by the way, is a very fine process. It has
been with us about a year and it has been successful whenever used. It has
a tendency to fall into disuse because it has not until now had an exact
place on the Six Basic Processes. But End of Cycle is actually an
additional process to the Remedy of Havingness and is an effective way of
remedying havingness. Do you remember in the old days the Dianetics "corpse
case" who would lie upon the couch with his arms crossed neatly, all ready
for a lily, and would always audit in this fashion? The solution to this
corpse case is End of Cycle Processing, as given here. The preclear is so
fixed in a death that he is trying to make everything unreal, and the only
real thing, to him, would be the unreality of death.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright �1955, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B is basically a reissue of PAB No. 50 which can be found in
context in Volume II, page 180.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1972
Remimeo
EXPANDED GITA
(Previously issued in the Journal of Scientology,
Issue 16-G, published by Hubbard Association of
Scientologists, Philadelphia, June 1953)
(This is an extension of Give and Take processing.) Test preclear to
see if he can get a mock-up he can see, no matter how vague. Then have him
WASTE, ACCEPT UNDER DURESS, DESIRE and finally Be Able to take or leave
alone each of the items listed below. He does this with mock-ups or ideas.
He must do the sequence of waste-etc. in the order given here for each
item. He wastes it by having it at remote distances in places where it will
do no good, being used or done or observed by something which cannot
appreciate it. When he is able to waste it in vast quantities the auditor
then has him accept it in mock-up form until he no longer is antagonistic
to having to accept it even when it is unpleasant and great force is
applied to make him take it. Again, with mock-ups, he must be able to bring
himself to desire it even in its worst form; then, by mock-ups of it in its
most desirable form he must come to be able to leave it entirely alone or
take it in its worst form without caring. EXPANDED GITA remedies contra-
survival abundance and scarcity. It will be found that before one can
accept a very scarce (to him) thing, he has to give it away. A person with
a milk allergy must be able to give away, in mock-up, enormous quantities
of milk, wasting it, before he can accept any himself. The items in this
list are compounded of several years of isolating what factors were more
important to minds than others. The list lacks very few of the very
important items, if any. Additions to or subtractions from this list should
not be attempted. Viewpoint, Work and Pain should be heavily and often
stressed and given priority.
Waste, Have Forced Upon, Desire, Be Able to Give or Take, in that
order, each of the following: (Order of items here is random.) Viewpoint,
Work, Pain, Beauty, Motion, Engrams, Ugliness, Logic, Pictures,
Confinement, Money, Parents, Blackness, Police, Light, Explosions, Bodies,
Degradation, Male Bodies, Female Bodies, Babies, Children Male, Children
Female, Strange and Peculiar Bodies, Dead Bodies, Affinity (Love),
Agreement, Beautiful Bodies, People, Attention, Admiration, Force, Energy,
Lightning, Unconsciousness, Problems, Antagonism, Reverence, Fear, Objects,
Time, Eating Human Bodies, Sound, Grief, Beautiful Sadness, Hidden
Influences, Hidden Communications, Doubts, Faces, Dimension Points, Anger,
Apathy, Ideas, Enthusiasm, Disagreement, Hate, Sex, Reward, Eating Parents,
Eaten by Mother, Eaten by Father, Eating Men, Eaten by Men, Eating Women,
Eaten by Women, Start, Broken Communications, Written Communications,
Stillness, Exhaustion, Women Stopping Motion, Men Stopping Motion, Changing
Motion Women, Changing Motion Men, Changing Motion Babies, Changing Motion
Children, Starting Motion Men, Starting Motion Women, Starting Motion
Children, Starting Motion Objects, Starting Motion Self, Omens, Wickedness,
Forgiveness, Play, Games, Sound, Machinery, Touch, Traffic, Stolen Goods,
Stolen Pictures, Homes, Blasphemy, Caves, Medicine, Glass, Mirrors, Pride,
Musical Instruments, Dirty Words, Space, Wild Animals, Pets, Birds, Air,
Water, Food, Milk, Garbage, Gases, Excreta, Rooms, Beds, Punishment,
Boredom, Confusion, Soldiers, Executioners, Doctors, Judges, Psychiatrists,
Alcoholic Liquor, Drugs, Masturbation, Rewards, Heat, Cold, Forbidden
Things, God, The Devil, Spirits, Bacteria, Glory, Dependence,
Responsibility, Wrongness, Rightness, Insanity, Sanity, Faith, Christ,
Death, Rank, Poverty, Maps, Irresponsibility, Greetings, Farewells, Credit,
Loneliness, Jewels, Teeth, Genitalia, Complications, Help, Pretense, Truth,
Lies, Assurance, Contempt, Predictability, Unpredictability, Vacuums, White
Clouds, Black Clouds, Unattainables, Hidden Things, Worry, Revenge,
Textbooks, Kisses, The Past, The Future, The
Present, Arms, Stomachs, Bowels, Mouths, Cigarettes, Smoke, Urine, Vomit,
Convulsions, Saliva, Flowers, Semen, Blackboards, Fireworks, Toys,
Vehicles, Dolls, Audiences, Doors, Walls, Weapons, Blood, Ambitions,
Illusions, Betrayal, Ridicule, Hope, Happiness, Mothers, Fathers,
Grandparents, Suns, Planets, Moons, Sensation, Looking, Incidents, Waiting,
Silence, Talking, Knowing, Not Knowing, Doubts, Fac One, Remembering,
Forgetting, Auditing, Minds, Fame, Power, Accidents, Illnesses, Approval,
Tiredness, Faces, Acting, Drama, Costumes, Sleep, Holding Things Apart,
Holding Things Together, Destroying Things, Sending Things Away, Making
Things Go Fast, Making Things Appear, Making Things Vanish, Convictions,
Stability, Changing People, Silent Men, Silent Women, Silent Children,
Symbols of Weakness, Symbols of Force, Disabilities, Education, Languages,
Bestiality, Homosexuality, Invisible Bodies, Invisible Acts, Invisible
Scenes, Accepting Things Back, Games, Rules, Players, Restimulation, Sexual
Restimulation, Space Reduction, Size Reduction, Entertainment,
Cheerfulness, Freedom for Others to Talk, Act, Feel Pain, Be Sad, Thetans,
Personalities, Cruelty, Organizations. TRY FIRST: Healthy Bodies, Strong
Bodies, Good Perception, Good Recall.
WARNING: Should your preclear become unstable or upset doing this
process take him to STEP VI. Then return to this list.
COMMENT: The mind is sufficiently complicated that it can be expected
to have computations on almost all the above. Thus there is no single
clearing button and search for it is at the dictate of a circuit, the
mechanism of circuits being to search for something hidden. Thus, your
preclear may begin to compute and philosophize and seek to find the
"button" that will release all this. All this releases all the buttons so
tell him to relax and go on with the process every time he starts to
compute.
NOTE: Running the above will bring to the surface without further
attention the "computation on the case" and the service facsimile. Do not
audit these. Run EXPANDED GITA.
STEP V - PRESENT TIME DIFFERENTIATION. EXTERIORIZATION BY SCENERY. Have
preclear, with his body's eyes, study and see the difference between
similar real objects such as the two legs of a chair, the spaces between
the back, two cigarettes, two trees, two girls. He must see and study the
objects. It is not enough to remember the objects. The definition of a CASE
V is "no mock-ups, only blackness." Have him continue this process until he
is alert. Use liberally and often.
Then exteriorize by having the preclear close his eyes and move actual
places on Earth under him, preferably places he has not been. Have him
bring these up to him. Find two similar things in the scene and observe the
difference between them. Move him over oceans and cities until he is
certain that he is exteriorized.
Then, preferably while exteriorized, have him do STEP I.
This case has to know before he can be. His viewpoint is in the past.
Give him present time viewpoints until he is a STEP I by the methods given
for STEP V.
(COMMENT: PRESENT TIME DIFFERENTIATION is a very good general technique
and resolves chronic somatics and improves tone.)
Assume other people's viewpoints as a drill-not what they think about
things, but as they look at things in the material universe. Attempt to be
in the location of a leaf, blade of grass, car headlamp, etc., and view the
universe.
STEP VI-A-R-C STRAIGHT WIRE using next-to-last list of Self Analysis in
Scientology which asks preclear to recall something really real to him,
etc. Then use the lists in Self Analysis. This level is the neurotic. It is
identified by the preclear having mockups which will not persist or which
won't go away. Use also PRESENT TIME DIFFERENTIATION. Then go to STEP IV.
At any drop in tone, return case to STEP VI.
STEP VII-PSYCHOTIC CASES. (Whether in or out of body.) The psychotic
appears to be in such desperate straits that the auditor often errs in
thinking desperate measures are necessary. Use the lightest possible
methods. Give case space and freedom where possible. Have psychotic imitate
(not mock up) various things. Have him do PRESENT TIME DIFFERENTIATION.
Get him to tell the difference between things by actual touch. Have him
locate, differentiate and touch things that are really real to him (real
objects or items). If inaccessible, mimic him with own body, whatever he
does, until he comes into communication. Have him locate corners of the
room and hold them without thinking. As soon as his communication is up go
to STEP VI, but be very sure he changes any mock-up around until he knows
it is a mock-up, that it exists, and that he himself made it. Do not run
engrams. He is psychotic because viewpoints in present time are so scarce
that he has gone into the past for viewpoints which at least he knew
existed. By PRESENT TIME DIFFERENTIATION, by tactile on objects, restore
his idea of an abundance of viewpoint in present time. If he has been given
electric shock, do not process it or any other brutality. Work him for very
brief periods, for his attention span is short. Always work psychotics with
another auditor or a companion present.
NOTE: All steps for all cases. If in doubt as to condition of case,
test with STEP Vl.
NOTE: An operating thetan must also be able to manufacture particles of
admiration and force in abundance.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: sb.rd
Copyright �1953, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B is taken from Journal of Scientology, Issue 16-G, June
1953, Standard Operating Procedure 8, which can be found in context in
Volume I, page 390.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 MAY 1972
Remimeo
THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVINGNESS
(Previously issued as PAB No. 72, 21 February 1956)
A careful study of staff auditors' reports reveals that the only
advances worthy of the name of Scientology occur when the auditor repairs
or remedies havingness on the preclear. Without the repair and remedy of
havingness no real gains become apparent. A preclear will not progress when
his havingness is impaired.
What are the symptoms of loss of havingness? Running any as-ising
techniques the preclear may become anaten, slightly nervous, agitated, want
a cigarette, or seem to break out of the session in some fashion. In either
case, he is "down on havingness." In other words he has burned up, used up,
or as-ised, too much of his physical body energy in the auditing itself. In
view of the fact that every subjective technique puts a sort of hole in the
middle of the electronic mass surrounding a preclear, parts of that mass
then begin to cave in on the preclear. Thus running an as-ising technique
on a preclear beyond the ability of the preclear to sustain the consequent
loss of havingness will bring on in the preclear many new engrams which he
did not have before. A technique which as-ises energy, if used without a
repair or remedy of havingness, will bring about a worsening of the case of
a preclear.
Now exactly what is happening is very simple. A preclear starts to go
anaten and the auditor keeps on running the process. He hasn't realized
that he ought to interrupt a process at any time if the preclear
demonstrates a loss of havingness. Anaten is such a demonstration of loss
of havingness. All right, another example: the preclear becomes agitated or
upset; he reaches for a cigarette; he begins to twitch; his foot begins to
wobble; he begins to talk excitedly; he begins to cough while being
audited. All of these things demonstrate a loss of havingness. These same
conditions, by the way, can result from the preclear believing that the
auditor has broken the Auditor's Code in some fashion or has overcome his
power of choice. Both a repair and remedy of havingness are immediately
indicated on the observation of anaten or agitation on the part of the
preclear. In addition the auditor should carefully go over the session
itself to find out, if anywhere, the preclear believed his power of choice
was being overcome, or if the preclear believed the Auditor's Code had been
broken. You understand that the auditor didn't necessarily have to overcome
the preclear's power of choice or break the Auditor's Code in order that
the preclear should believe that this has happened. However, this could be
overlooked entirely if the auditor had been careful enough to repair or
remedy the havingness of the preclear.
The slightest drop of alertness on the part of the preclear, or the
slightest agitation or somatic, should immediately indicate to the auditor
that havingness has dropped and must be immediately repaired or remedied. A
great deal of time can be spent on the subject of repair and remedy of
havingness, and it is time spent with great benefit. It is better to
"waste" time spent repairing and remedying havingness than to blunder on
through. Now there is another thing I have noticed with regard to this.
Auditors are running these days toward cognition. Very well, if they expect
a preclear to cognite they should not expect him to pull in a bank upon
himself. If an auditor runs a very obvious process which should bring the
preclear toward cognition, runs it several auditing commands and then stops
and repairs and remedies the preclear's havingness, and then after that
asks him the same auditing question two more times, he will discover that
he has blown a cognition into view. In other words you could remedy the
havingness of a preclear while his mind was on one particular subject and
bring a cognition into existence.
This becomes particularly important today, since a few months ago I
discovered that you could remedy the havingness of anybody, and I mean just
that!! You can remedy anybody's havingness and you can turn on mock-ups on
anybody. The fact that the preclear who has a black field can be caused to
mock up blacknesses or invisibilities and shove them into his body brings
us into an era of being able to make anybody turn on mock-ups. Getting the
preclear to postulate that the mocked up blackness is bad for the body will
cause that blackness to snap into the body. By getting the preclear to
postulate that the invisible mass he has mocked up is bad for the body it
will snap into the body. Of course, after this has been done a few times,
the consideration of the preclear will change. Then perhaps the blackness
or invisibility will only snap in when the preclear postulates that it is
good for the body. He may also have a residue left. It is very important to
get rid of these repair and remedy of havingness residues. By various
postulates such as that the residue is a threat to the body, it is good for
the body, it is bad for the body, the residue too will snap in.
Let's differentiate at once here the difference between a repair of
havingness and a remedy of havingness. We used to call repair of havingness
"giving him some havingness." It needs a better technical term. Therefore
let us call this "Repair of Havingness." It means having the preclear mock
up anything he can mock up, and in any way it can be done get him to shove
(never pull) that mock-up into the body, and by similar means to get rid of
the residue which went along with the mock-up. That is a repair of
havingness. It is a one-way flow; it is an inflow.
Now a remedy of havingness is getting him to mock up and shove into the
body enough masses to bring him to a point where he can eventually throw
one away. In other words repair of havingness is simply having him mock up
things and having him shove them into the body, and a remedy of havingness
is having him mock up and shove in and throw away the same type of mock-up.
Remedy of havingness is always a superior operation to a repair of
havingness. Repair of havingness is a very crude stop-gap, but can be used
any time. However, a preclear who is working well, and on whom havingness
can be remedied, should, at all times, have his havingness remedied, not
repaired. In other words any type of mock-up should be both shoved into the
body and mocked up and thrown away. This should be done in considerable
quantity until the preclear is quite relaxed about that particular type of
mock-up. One does this, remember, every time the attention of the preclear
drops, or he becomes agitated.
There is one other little point connected with this which is quite
important, and that is, auditors very often audit a preclear into an area
of time when the preclear exteriorized. This, on a preclear who does not
exteriorize easily, brings on a considerable grief and sadness. The way to
get rid of this is, of course, to remedy the preclear's havingness or only
repair it, and to ask the preclear to recall times when he was not
exteriorized. This will bring up at once times when he did exteriorize and
where fear of exteriorization was built up considerably.
I have noticed another special condition regarding this exteriorization
phenomena which is quite important. A preclear will occasionally repair and
remedy havingness up to a point where the body disappears for him. He
doesn't quite know where to put the mass he has mocked up since he cannot
find the body. This is particularly true of preclears who have a very low
threshold on havingness. An auditor would be stupid indeed to simply plow
along beyond that point where the preclear has already said that he
couldn't find any body to push any havingness into. The moment the preclear
does that the auditor should suspect that the preclear has gotten into an
exteriorization type incident. It is not, however, necessary that he
immediately flounder around and try to find this incident as recommended in
the paragraphs just above. He can also repair and remedy havingness in this
fashion, and it is very important to know this. Although it is disastrous
for a preclear to be asked "What could your body have?" since he will
simply strip the bank of various old facsimiles, it is a very, very good
repair of havingness to ask a preclear "What is there around this room
(area) which your body could have?" and then have him pick out specific
objects in the environment which he says the body could have. If he does
this he will come up the gradient scale of havingness, and his havingness
will be repaired immediately or directly on the Sixth Dynamic. With a
preclear who cannot get mock-ups and where the auditor has either
been too clumsy to get the preclear's mock-ups turned on or it really was
impossible, more or less, the preclear's havingness can be repaired by
having him do this process. So this is a very, very important process, and
one that ought to go down in red letters.
This whole subject of repair and remedy of havingness and its effect
upon auditing, and the fact that it has not been stressed at all in
training, being up there at Level Six in the old Basic Processes, brings us
to SLP Issue 8. The entirety of Level One in SLP 8 will be devoted to the
repair and remedy of havingness.
In SLP Issue 7 we have a great many phenomena associated with the
remedy of the body's havingness. The reason for their position is to bring
about an adjustment of the condition of the body before one goes on to
other and more complicated ways of processing. Now, in Issue 8, all of
these various things will be retained, but they will be paralleled with a
complete remedy of havingness and that particular level of SLP will be gone
over. In actual experience it is better to remedy the havingness of a
preclear, no matter where he is on the tone scale, and no matter by what
process, than to run any significant process. Further, if a preclear cannot
at least repair his havingness, to run Waterloo Station is to invite
disaster, because in this particular process of Level 2 he is liable to get
himself into a "down havingness" situation and of course will not be able
to not-know anything. He may be chewing up too much energy while trying to
not-know. Thus we would have the failures which have occasionally occurred
in Waterloo Station. They were simply havingness failures, not a failure of
Waterloo Station. Further there has been a new command suggested for
Waterloo Station: "What would you be willing to not-know about that
person?" This seems to be a better command, at least for the British Isles.
We also take care of the vacuums and separatenesses and everything else
with repair or remedy of havingness and running it in with certain other
things, such as problems, etc. When we discover by two-way communication a
weak universe, we could then ask the individual preclear, "Invent a problem
that person (weak universe) could be to you." Then, watching him very
carefully, and repairing his havingness on the subject of that person's
possessions, get a very rapid separation of universes. I have noticed that
the weak universe came about when the person elected by the preclear to be
a weak universe first began to put mest anchor points around the preclear.
In other words, valuable presents.
I am as pleased as can be to get a finger on this point and I know well
that if East, West, North and South would begin to repair and remedy
havingness and stop specializing in significances without repair or remedy
of havingness, we are going to start shooting people up to the top of these
Scientometric graphs. We can't help it.
Let me call your attention specifically to the old phenomena of the
emotional scale and the engram. We found out that when one engram was keyed
in, it fixed the emotional tone of the individual. Then we had him run this
and as he converted the engram to usable havingness, we found that his tone
rose. We discover on these Scientometric charts that the "unhappy" section
does not move if we don't change the mass of the preclear.
SACRIFICES
The latest news from the research front has to do with the fact that
the GE demands and requires and has to have, evidently, sacrifices. The GE
does not run on an overt act-motivator sequence, which makes one suspect he
is not a thetan. A GE runs exclusively on being sacrificed to. If you have
the preclear mock up sacrifices to the GE, you will find these become very
readily assimilated.
On a lower level the body accepts motivators; as soon as it is through
this motivator band, it accepts sacrifices and finally comes up to a point
where it will accept live bodies. When one considers that eating is
entirely a matter of absorbing death, one sees this death hunger in
processing by running Sacrifices. A person who has had bad legs should have
a sacrifice of legs run on him and so forth. This is astonishing material.
It is almost unbelievable that the GE will not be sacrificed to anything,
but will
only be sacrificed to, and this phenomenon that the GE is thereby demanding
death tells us at once that the atomic bomb will be used and that there are
people in the world who will actually crave this sacrifice of cities and
even nations.
Aside from being a fantastically workable process, more of which anon,
this matter of sacrifices tells us at once a great deal about the future.
There will be no moral restraint where the atomic bomb is concerned. For
about the highest level in some areas of the world, as to case, is
"operating GE." This tells us, too, why soldiers will go to war. This
explains a great deal of conduct.
The GE evidently operates on the postulate that as long as anything
else is alive it can't live. However, it is becoming more and more doubtful
that there is any more life in the body than the thetan puts there, and
that the body is a single machine operating on some implanted postulates
contained in the energy masses which are activated by the thetan somewhat
on the order of the old "pole" theta trap. Many of these considerations can
be changed around rather easily. Nothing changes them quite so fast as
these sacrifice processes.
In mocking up sacrifices the auditor should use all the skills of
creative processing and ensure that the preclear is actually mocking up and
is not dragging in old facsimiles from the bank and restimulating genetic
line incidents. This can be obviated by having the persons in the mock-ups
dressed in modern clothing; mocking up the incident as happening tomorrow;
altering the mock-up in some manner, such as turning the face green or
something of this nature. Any reasonable way in which you can ensure that
you are dealing with mock-ups and not past track facsimiles.
This gives auditors another tool with which to handle chronic somatics.
There is another process which has a great deal of workability with
chronic somatics. I know that some months ago and earlier than that it
seemed rather fatal to us to continue to fixate the preclear's attention on
the chronic somatic. But that is not a problem with us right now. It ceased
to be a problem the moment I invented an auditing command exactly as
follows: "Invent a problem that (leg, arm, nose, eye, body) could be to
you. " Running this command, which is in itself a sort of remedy of
havingness, and repairing and remedying the havingness of the preclear as
we go, we will discover that practically any and all phenomena associated
with the service facsimile will come away and clear up, and the limb, nose
or eye will get well. This can be used as a word of warning: ONLY ON ACTUAL
TERMINALS. Never use this command, and I mean NEVER, on actual conditions.
Never ask him to invent problems lameness could be to him. Never ask him
what problem blindness could be to him. Lameness and blindness are
conditions. We want to know what problems legs or eyes can be to him, since
legs and eyes are terminals. In running this command we reduce havingness
too rapidly whenever we are stressing conditions. Therefore we run it only
on terminals. In running it use only terminals. Handled in this way we do
have the answer as of this moment, to chronic somatics. With these
processes in SLP and the adequate repair and remedy of havingness we can
push our preclears right up through the top.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.rd
Copyright �1956, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The above HCO B is a reissue of PAB No. 72, 21 February 1956, which can be
found in context in Volume II, page 371.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 MAY 1972
Remimeo
ROBOTISM
(Reference HCOB 28 Nov 1970, C/S Series 22,
"Psychosis" . )
A technical advance has been made in relation to the inactivity,
slowness or incompetence of human beings.
This discovery proceeds from a two and a half year intense study of
aberration as it affects the ability to function as a group member.
The ideal group member is capable of working causatively in full
cooperation with his fellows in the achievement of group goals and the
realization of his own happiness.
The primary human failing is an inability to function as himself or
contribute to group achievements.
Wars, political upsets, organizational duress, growing crime rates,
increasingly heavy "justice", growing demands for excessive welfare,
economic failure and other age long and repeating conditions find a common
denominator in the inability of human beings to coordinate.
The current political answer, in vogue in this century and growing, is
totalitarianism where the state orders the whole life of the individual.
The production figures of such states are very low and their crimes against
the individual are numerous.
A discovery therefore of what this factor is, that makes the humanoid
the victim of oppression, would be a valuable one.
The opening lines of Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health
comment on Man's lack of an answer for himself.
The group needs such an answer in order to survive and for its
individual members to be happy.
SCALE
[pic]
NEEDING ORDERS
The exact mechanism of needing orders is to be found as an outgrowth of
the mental condition outlined in HCOB 28 Nov 1970, "Psychosis".
The individual with an evil purpose has to withhold himself because he
may do destructive things.
When he fails to withhold himself he commits overt acts on his fellows
or other dynamics and occasionally loses control and does so.
This of course makes him quite inactive.
To overcome this he refuses any responsibility for his own actions.
Any motion he makes must be on the responsibility of others.
He operates then only when given orders.
Thus he must have orders to operate.
Therefore one could term such a person a robot. And the malady could be
called robotism.
PERCEPTION
Studies of perception undertaken since HCOB 28 Nov 70 reveal that
sight, hearing and other channels of awareness decrease in proportion to
the number of overt acts-and therefore withholds-which the person has
committed on the whole track.
By relieving these sight has been remarkably brightened.
Therefore a person who is withholding himself from committing overt
acts because of his own undesired purposes has very poor perception.
He does not see the environment around him.
Thus, combined with his unwillingness to act on his own initiative,
there is a blindness to the environment.
OVERT PRODUCTS
(see P/L 14 Nov 70, Org Series 14)
Since he does not act upon orders he is taking responsibility for, he
executes orders without fully understanding them.
Further he executes them in an environment he does not see.
Thus when forced to produce he will produce overt products. These are
called so because they are not in actual fact useful products but something
no one wants and are overt acts in themselves-such as inedible biscuits or
a "repair" that is just further breakage.
SLOWNESS
The person is slow because he is moving on other-determinism, is
carefully withholding himself and cannot see anyway.
Thus he feels lost, confused or unsafe and cannot move positively.
Because he produces overt products he gets slapped around or goes
unthanked and so begins a decline.
He cannot move swiftly and if he does has accidents. So he teaches
himself to be careful and cautious.
JUSTICE
Group justice is of some use but all it really does is make the person
withhold himself even harder and while a necessary restraint, nevertheless
does not itself bring a lasting improvement.
Threats and "heads on a pike" (meaning examples of discipline) do
however jar the person into giving his attention and channeling his actions
into a more desirable path from the group viewpoint.
Justice is necessary in a society of such people but it is not a remedy
for improvement.
MALICE
Despite the viciousness of the truly insane, there is little or no real
malice in the robot.
The truly insane cannot control or withhold their evil purposes and
dramatize them at least covertly.
The insane are not always visible. But they are visible enough. And
they are malicious.
The robot on the other hand does control his evil impulses to a great
extent.
He is not malicious.
His danger mainly stems from the incompetent things he does, the time
of others he consumes, the waste of time and material and the brakes he
puts on the general group endeavor.
He does not do all these things intentionally. He does not really know
he is doing them.
He looks in wounded surprise at the wrath he generates when he breaks
things, wrecks programs and gets in the way. He does not know he is doing
these things. For he cannot see that he is. He may go along for some time
doing (slowly wasteful) well and then carelessly smashes the exact thing
that wrecks the whole activity.
People suppose he cunningly intended to do so. He seldom does.
He winds up even more convinced he can't be trusted and that he should
withhold harder!
FALSE REPORTS
The robot gives many false reports. Unable to see, how can he know what
is true?
He seeks to fend off wrath and attract good will by "PR" (public
relations boasts) without realizing he is giving false reports.
MORALE
The robot goes into morale declines easily. Since production is the
basis of morale, and since he does not really produce much, left to his own
devices, his morale sags heavily.
PHYSICAL INERTIA
The body is a physical object. It is not the being himself.
As a body has mass it tends to remain motionless unless moved and tends
to keep going in a certain direction unless steered.
As he is not really running his body, the robot has to be moved when
not moving or diverted if moving on a wrong course.
Thus anyone with one or more of such beings around him tends to get
exhausted with shoving them into motion or halting them when they go wrong.
Exhaustion only occurs when one does not understand the robot.
It is the exasperation that exhausts one.
With understanding one is not exasperated because he can handle the
situation. But only if he knows what it is.
PTS
Potential Trouble Sources are not necessarily robots.
A PTS person generally is withholding himself from a Suppressive Person
or group or thing.
Toward that SP person or group or thing he is a robot! He takes orders from
them if only in opposites.
His overts on the SP person make him blind and non-self-determined.
BASIC WHY
The basic reason behind persons who cannot function, are slow or
inactive or incompetent and who do not produce is
WITHHOLDING SELF FROM DOING DESTRUCTIVE THINGS, AND THUS UNWILLING TO
TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND THEREFORE NEEDING ORDERS.
The exact wording of this WHY must be done by the individual himself
after examining and grasping this principle.
If one writes this principle down on the top of a sheet and then asks
the person to word it exactly as it applies to himself one will attain the
individual why for inaction and incompetence. It will produce GIs and F/N
at the Examiner.
PROCESSING
Physical work in the physical universe, general confronting, reach and
withdraw; and Objective Processes go far in remedying this condition.
Touch assists regularly and correctly given to proper End Phenomena
will handle illnesses of such persons.
Word Clearing is vital tech to open the person's comm lines, wipe out
earlier misunderstoods and increase his understanding.
PTS tech will handle the person's robotism toward SP individuals,
groups or things. To this and the PTS Rundown can be added the WHY above as
it relates to the things or beings found as suppressive as a last step.
The why above can be used in Danger Formula work such as HCO P/L 9
April 72, Correct Danger Formula, and HCO P/L 3 May 72, "Ethics and
Executives". Other individual whys can exist in these instances.
EXPANDED DIANETICS
The miracle of well done perfectly executed Expanded Dianetics
eradicates both insanity and robotism. Drug handling and other actions may
be necessary.
END PRODUCT
The end product when one has fully handled robotism is not a person who
cannot follow orders or who operates solely on his own.
Totalitarian states fear any relief of the condition as they foolishly
actively promote and hope for such beings. But this is only a deficiency in
their own causes and their lack of experience with fully self-determined
beings. Yet education, advertising and amusements have been designed only
for robots. Even religions existed to suppress "Man's Evil Nature".
Lacking any examples or understanding many have feared to free the
robot to his own control and think even with horror on it.
But you see, beings are NOT basically robots. They are miserable when
they are.
Basically they prosper only when they are self-determined and can be
pandetermined to help in the prosperity of all.
LRH:sb.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1971 REVISED
Remimeo Issue II
Tech & Qual (Revised 9 Aug 71 )
(Revised 11 May 72)
Auditors Word Clearing Series 8RB
Word Clearers (Cancels HCOB 30 June 71 Issue II,
Only 8R and 8RR)
STANDARD C/S FOR WORD CLEARING IN SESSION
METHOD 1
0. Clear the words in the Word Clearing Correction List so as to have it
ready for use in case of bog.
1. Fly a rud if no F/N. If TA High or Low do not try to fly an ARC Brk.
Do a C/S 53RRR instead. (See Auditor's Rights C/S Series I if any
trouble with this pc. If errors in previous word clear sessions use
HCOB 21 July 1971 REVISED to handle word clearing corrections needed.)
2. Do not clear these words before assessment
ASSESS.
R Factor: We are going to go over a list of subjects to see if there is
any word you didn't understand while studying these subjects. (Assess the
whole list rapidly and clearly, good TR1 and noting every read from the
meter.)
Religion ____________ The Mind ____________
Ministers ____________ The Spirit ____________
Church ____________ Bodies ____________
College ____________ Sex ____________
Schools ____________ The Insane ____________
Sacrifices ____________ Psychiatry ____________
Surgery ____________ Psychoanalysis ____________
Medicine ____________ Psychology ____________
Electronics ____________ Rituals ____________
Physics ____________ Rites ____________
Technical Subjects ____________ Ships ____________
Dianetics ____________ The Sea ____________
Scientology ____________ Military ____________
Theology ____________ Armies ____________
Theosophy ____________ Navies ____________
Philosophy ____________ Stars ____________
Law ____________ Heavenly Bodies ____________
Organization ____________ The Universe ____________
Government ____________ Planes ____________
Written Materials ____________ Vehicles ____________
Text Books ____________ Machinery ____________
Practice ____________ Motors ____________
Science ____________ Administration ____________
Music ____________ Healing ____________
Arithmetic ____________ Illnesses ____________
Grammar ____________ Spoken Words ____________
The Humanities ____________ TAPES ____________
Add items dealing with this specific Pc's life. ____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
____________
3. Ask the Question, "Is there any word on this list you didn't
understand?" Clear it. Then do Step 5 on it before going on. (Do not
reassess this list because there was a list word not understood.)
4. Take the remaining reading items from the best read on down and with
E/S pull each one to F/N. Get each word you find to F/N. There can be
many F/Ns per subject End off with a win on the subject.
5. "In the subject of what word has been
misunderstood?"
He MUST look them up, so have a good dictionary handy. Do not accept "I
know the meaning" if the subject or word reads. CLEAR ''GRAMMAR'' or
grammatical words out of a simple book of grammar, not a dictionary.
It isn't an earlier time he misunderstood that word. It's an earlier
word in that subject and it can be an earlier subject.
Considerations about it and other questions are not touched.
Overts, W/Hs, etc are neglected. They are not done on the subject of
the word. They are done in the session ruds.
Just do the process and it will eventually F/N on each chain.
6. When all reads on the first assessment are handled to F/N, REASSESS
the whole list. Do not take off the list items already handled.
7. Repeat Step 4.
8. Repeat Step 5.
9. Repeat Step 6, etc.
10. IN CASE OF ANY BOG OR SOMATIC USE THE WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST
TO CORRECT THE BOG.
11. A persistent F/N should be attained on assessing the whole list as
the End Phenomena of the Word Clearing sessions.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.bh
Copyright �1971, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MARCH 1972
REVISED
(Revised 30 May 72)
Remimeo
Study Series 5R
THE PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
REVISED
Reference: LRH ED 174 INT Study and Tech Breakthrough
LRH ED 178 INT Super-Literacy
of 30 May 72
HCO B 4 Apr 72 The Primary Rundown
Revised 30 May 72
HCO B 25 Oct 71 The Special Drug Rundown
HCO B 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78
(Repairing Whys)
HCO PL 3 May 72 Ethics & Executives
HCO PL 5 Apr 72 PTS Type A Handling
HCO B 4 Feb 72 Study Correction List
HCO B 21 Jun 72 Method 7
Issue III
HCO B 21 Jun 72 Method 8
Issue IV
WHAT IT IS
The Primary Correction Rundown is a rundown given
(a) To a person who fails the Primary Rundown because of High or
Low TA or Study Troubles.
(b) To every Course Supervisor regardless of his TA.
(c) To persons whose literacy level is not adequate to do the
Primary Rundown.
(d) To persons on drugs or who have been on drugs.
(e) To auditors who go too often to Cramming.
(f) Auditors whose auditing errors show up later on pcs.
(g) Staff members who are not able to maintain stats.
(h) Staff members who get into Ethics trouble.
(i) Students with low study stats.
(j) Blown students.
(k) Members of the public who wish to purchase a "Study Rundown"
but who are not going to be auditors and who are not on major
Courses (HSDC, Academy Class IV, or above).
The Rundown consists of Ethics orientation on the first dynamic,
Potential Trouble Source from connections with hostile elements, drug
handling, case handling, the why of not using Study Tech or study, the
Study Correction List and handling, Method 7, a review of Grammar, and then
back to a Primary RD consisting of Method I Word Clearing, Method 8 on
Study Tapes and Student Hat.
The Primary Correction Rundown is actually a checklist where each one
of these is done.
This checklist is kept in his pc folder on the inside of the left front
cover and marked off.
______________________________ _____________________
Student's Name Date Begun
_____________________
Org
1. C/S 53RC (HCO B 31 Dec 71 Revised to 16 May 72). Assess and Handle
fully. DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
2. HCO PL 3 May 72 with 2 lists Listing & Nulling on steps 3 and 4 of
the PL. By an auditor. May require the repair of past Whys found by C/S
78. DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
3. PTS Check by Auditor. Is he connected to anyone hostile to Dianetics
or Scientology? Handle by PL 5 Apr 72. (It isn't necessary he leave to
handle. A letter will do.) More extensive action can be done later when
he gets a full PTS RD. Such persons can also be run as a Problem.
DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
4. Drug Handling. HCO B 25 Oct 71, The Special Drug Rundown. DECLARED AT
EXAMINER.
5. Case Handling. Pgm by C/S to cover obvious outnesses, GF Method 5, GF
40XR and other actions needful. (If chronically ill or has a psychotic
history should be run on Expanded Dianetics if available, if not by
objective processes and Dianetics.) (Can also be run on Triple or
Expanded Grades.) DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
6. The Why of not Studying if never studied before in an org or not
using Study Tech. Done as a BD F/N Item. DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
7. The Study Correction List HCO B 4 Feb 72. Assess Method 5 with good
TRs, good Impingement, good metering. Handle in full. If PTS shows up
again do full PTS RD. Handle to a full F/Ning list on final assessment.
DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
8. Method 7 HCO B 21 June 72 Issue III. Done by a Word Clearer. DECLARED
AT EXAMINER.
9. Review of Grammar by a Word Clearer M4 with student studying between
checks by himself and reporting daily. Use a simple grammar such as
that developed for foreign language students. Do not use an American
dictionary and an English Grammar or vice versa, either both American
or both English. Must check out clean on Method 4 and know about
grammar. DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
10. Method 1 Word Clearing HCO B 30 June 71 Revised to 11 May 72, Word
Clearing Series 8RB. A11 the misunderstood background words of all
words on the list must be cleared. The list must F/N. DECLARED AT
EXAMINER.
11. Method 8, HCO B 21 June 72 Issue IV, Study Tapes. DECLARED AT
EXAMINER.
12. Method 8, Student Hat. DECLARED AT EXAMINER.
WITH A FINAL CHECKOUT AT EXAMINER THE PERSON MAY BE DECLARED SUPER-
LITERATE.
This is the whole of the Primary Correction Rundown.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1972
REVISED 30 MAY 1972
Remimeo
Tech Div
PRIMARY RUNDOWN
(REVISED)
References: LRH ED 178 INT SUPER-LITERACY
LRH ED 174 INT HIGHEST PRIORITY
STUDY AND TECH BREAKTHROUGH
HCO B 30 Mar 72 THE PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
Revised 30 May 72 REVISED
HCOB 3() Jun 71 Word Clearing Series 8RB
Revised Issue II STANDARD C/S FOR WORD CLEARING
Revised 9 Aug 71 IN SESSION METHOD 1
Revised 11 May 72
HCO B 21 July 71 Word Clearing Series 35
Revised WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST
Revised 9 Aug 71 REVISED
Revised 31 Mar 72
HCO B 21 Jun 72 Word Clearing Series 41
Issue IV METHOD 8
HCO B 16 Apr 72 HANDLING OF NO INTERFERENCE AREA
Issue II PERSONS ORDERED TO A PRIMARY
[now canceled] CORRECTION RUNDOWN AND DELIVERY
OF TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN
HCO B 25 Oct 71 THE SPECIAL DRUG RUNDOWN
Issue II [now BTB]
HCO PL 19 Mar 72 Word Clearing Series 34
Issue III HIGH CRIME POLICY AND WORD CLEARING
HCO B 3 Apr 72 Study Series 6
PRIMARY RUNDOWN NOTE
To know about the importance of the Primary Rundown read LRH ED 178
Int.
The Primary Rundown consists of word clearing and Study Tech. It makes
a student SUPER-LITERATE.
The Primary Rundown is given in the TECH DIVISION (Div IV, Dept 11).
(The TECH DIV may also give that portion of the Primary Correction
Rundown which calls for Method 1 and Method 8 of the Primary Correction
Rundown which is described in HCO B 30 March 72 Revised 30 May 72.)
SIMPLICITY
The Primary Rundown is very simple in its steps. Do NOT add things onto
it. Do not do something else.
HONESTY
The keynote of the Rundown is Honesty. The whole rundown can be wasted
and the student fail and the End Phenomena missed if the student goes
dishonest or he is just pushed for student points by the Supervisor.
If done dishonestly the whole future study career of the student will
be not only more difficult but may fail entirely.
Honesty means don't skip, don't brush it off, don't say it was done when it
wasn't.
Later checks of auditing or administrative failures contain checks of
the Primary Rundown errors and honesty. The whole rundown would have to be
done again.
STEPS
1. Verify if student's Tone Arm on a meter is usually between
position 2 and 3. If so he may proceed. If not he at once is sent to the
Primary Correction Rundown as his case needs repair or handling before he
can do the Rundown as mental mass will get in his way and he may get upset.
This step is checked by the Supervisor.
(The Primary Correction Rundown is covered by HCO B 30 March 72 REVISED
30 May 72. It consists of auditing and study correction actions.)
2. If the Tone Arm is usually between 2 and 3 on the meter dial
the person is made into a Word Clear using Method 1 Word Clearing. (HCO B
30 June 71 Revised Issue II, Revised 9 Aug 71, Revised 11 May 72, WORD
CLEARING SERIES 8RB.) This is done in the HGC or Dept 13 of Qual or may be
done in a student Co-Audit. Failure to do this step or do it well will make
Study Tech difficult. A good job on this Method One will give back a
person's education and send his Intelligence Quotient up. It is not a
quickie action. The person doing Word Clearing Method 1 on a person is
doing an auditing action. It has to be done well to achieve the final
result of becoming a Word Clear.
If any errors are made or the person does not F/N at the Examiner
(where he goes after each session for a meter check), HCO B 21 July 71
Revised (Revised 9 Aug 71, 31 Mar 72), WORD CLEARING SERIES 35, the Word
Clearing Correction List, is used. It can be used as often as there are
upsets.
This step should be done before the next step is begun as it makes the
next step so much easier.
HCO P/L 19 Mar 72 Issue III, Word Clearing Series 34, HIGH CRIME
POLICY, also applies.
3. If in doing Method 1 the person was found to be very deficient
in Grammar and vocabulary, even though Method One was finished but took a
very long time or couldn't be finished due to case, the person is sent to
Dept 13 for the Primary Correction Rundown.
4. If the person did all right on Method 1, he is now put on Study
Tapes. This is NOT just listening to Study Tapes, heaven forbid. This is
HCO B 21 June 72 Issue IV, Word Clearing Series 41, METHOD 8.
This is a long and careful cycle.
It is completed in full.
It consists of looking up every new word on the tape in a grammar or
large dictionary and then listening to the tape.
The full directions are given in HCO B 21 June 72 Issue IV, Word
Clearing Series 41, Method 8.
5. The Student Hat is now done Method 8.
This completes the Primary Rundown.
If correctly done, the person will achieve the condition of Super-
Literacy. This is fully described in LRH ED 178 International of 30 May 72.
COURSE SUPERVISOR
It is up to the Course Supervisor to hold this line in. His students
will not prosper if their study is begun without a Primary Rundown.
It is a high crime to omit this vital step.
NO INTERFERENCE ZONE
Persons who are on Solo Auditing between R6EW and OT III may not be put
on a Primary Rundown or a Primary Correction Rundown. See HCO B 16 Apr 72
Issue II.
They may not be given Method 1 Word Clearing. They may only be Method
4ed on Solo Instruction Materials.
BUT THEY MAY NOT BE DEBARRED FROM STUDY.
To all but those in the No Interference Area THE PRIMARY RUNDOWN IS THE
REQUIRED FIRST STEP TO ALL STUDY.
When on or after OT III, such persons must now do the Primary Rundown
before any continuance of study. It now becomes Mandatory.
CORRECTION RD
The Primary Correction Rundown takes care of people who have trouble on
the Primary Rundown.
But do not lightly order the person to the Primary Correction RD. If
they can get through the Primary Rundown with a bit of Supervisor time, let
them go on through.
But if they are nattery or upset or desperate even when given help, it
is the Primary Correction Rundown which will handle.
Do not just get rid of a Class to Qual.
DRUGS
Students who are or have been on Drugs need a Drug Rundown before
tackling Method 1. Drugs fog up a student and prevent gains. And he loses
the gains he gets.
The answer is a full Drug Rundown. (See HCO B 25 Oct 71, "The Special
Drug Rundown".) This will end off the drugs and let him live way above any
plane he thought drugs put him on.
We handle drug cases so easily it is foolish not to take this obvious
step. The reason he went on drugs or alcohol also comes off.
Then he can study and retain what he learns.
OPEN DOOR
The Primary Rundown is the open door to brilliance.
Super-Literacy is a new state for Man, existing in the past only in a
few, accidentally, who became the geniuses and great names of the race.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1968 REVISED
(Amends HCO Bulletin of 9 January 1968 List L4A)
(ITEM 6 CORRECTED 12 FEBRUARY 1969)
Remimeo
(Amended 8 August 1970)
(Amended 18 March 1971 )
(Revised 2 June 72)
L4BR
FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING ERRORS
ASSESS THE WHOLE LIST (METHOD 5) THEN TAKE Biggest reads or BDs and
handle. Then clean up the list.
PC'S NAME DATE________________
AUDITOR _______________________________________
1. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THE LISTING QUESTION?
(If it reads, find out what question, clear the question noting
whether it reads, if so, list it, find the item and give it to the pc.)
2. WAS THE LIST UNNECESSARY?
(If it reads, indicate BPC and indicate that it was an unnecessary
action.)
2A. DID THE QUESTION HAVE NO CHARGE ON IT?
(Indicate.)
2B. WERE YOU ASHAMED TO CAUSE AN UPSET?
(L 1 C after list corrected. )
2C. WERE YOU AMAZED TO REACT THAT WAY?
(Same as 2B. )
2D. THE QUESTION HAD ALREADY BEEN LISTED BEFORE.
(Indicate rehab.)
2E. YOU HAD NO INTEREST IN THE QUESTION?
(Indicate that the auditor missed that it didn't read.)
3. WAS THE ACTION DONE UNDER PROTEST?
(If it reads, handle by itsa earlier similar itsa.)
4. IS A LIST INCOMPLETE?
(If reads, find out what list and complete it, give the pc his item.)
5. HAS A LIST BEEN LISTED TOO LONG?
(If so, find what list and get the item off from it by nulling with
suppress, the nulling question being: "On ____has anything been
suppressed?", for each item on the overlong list. Give the pc his
item.)
6. HAVE WE TAKEN THE WRONG ITEM OFF A LIST?
(If this reads, put in Suppress and Invalidated on the list and null
as in 5. above and find the right item and give to the pc.)
7. HAS A RIGHT ITEM BEEN DENIED YOU?
(If this reads, find out what it was and clean it up with Suppress
and Invalidate and give it to the pc.)
8. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PUSHED OFF ON YOU YOU DIDN'T WANT?
(If so, find it and get in Suppress and Invalidate on it and tell pc
it wasn't his item and continue the original action to find the correct
item.)
9. HAD AN ITEM NOT BEEN GIVEN YOU?
(If reads, handle as in 7.)
10. HAVE YOU INVALIDATED A CORRECT ITEM FOUND?
(If so, rehab the item and find out why the pc invalidated it or if
somebody else did it, clean it up and give it to pc again.)
11. HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF ITEMS THAT YOU DID NOT PUT ON THE LIST?
(If so, add them to the correct list. Renull the whole list and give
the pc the item. )
12. HAVE YOU BEEN LISTING TO YOURSELF OUT OF SESSION?
(If so, find out what question and try to write a list from recall
and get an item and give it to the pc.)
13. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN SOMEBODY ELSE'S ITEM?
(If so, indicate to the pc this was not his item. Don't TRY to find
whose it was. )
14. HAS YOUR ITEM BEEN GIVEN TO SOMEONE ELSE?
(If so, find if possible what item it was and give it to the pc.
Don't try to identify the "somebody else".)
14A. WERE EARLIER LISTING ERRORS RESTIMULATED?
(Indicate and correct earlier lists then check the current)
14B. HAD THIS LIST ALREADY BEEN HANDLED?
(Indicate. )
15. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BY-PASSED ON LISTING?
(If so, indicate the overrun to the pc, rehab back.)
16. HAS A RELEASE POINT BEEN BY-PASSED ON THE QUESTION ONLY?
(If so, indicate the overrun to the pc and rehab back.)
17. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR WHILE LISTING?
(If so, rehab. If Ext Rundown not given, note for C/S.)
18. HAS IT BEEN AN OVERT TO PUT AN ITEM ON A LIST?
(If so, find out what item and why.)
19. HAVE YOU WITHHELD AN ITEM FROM A LIST?
(If so, get it and add it to the list if that list available. If not
put item in the report. )
20. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED?
(If so, get it, if discreditable ask "Who nearly found out?")
21. HAS AN ITEM BEEN BY-PASSED?
(Locate which one.)
22. WAS A LISTING QUESTION MEANINGLESS?
(If so, find out which one and indicate to the pc.)
23. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ABANDONED?
(If so, locate it and get it back for the pc and give it to him.)
24. HAS AN ITEM BEEN PROTESTED?
(If so, locate it and get the protest button in on it.)
25. HAS AN ITEM BEEN ASSERTED?
(If so, locate it and get in the assert button on it.)
26. HAS AN ITEM BEEN SUGGESTED TO YOU BY ANOTHER?
(If so, get it named and the protest and refusal off.)
27. HAS AN ITEM BEEN VOLUNTEERED BY YOU AND NOT ACCEPTED?
(If so, get off the charge and give it to the pc, or if he then
changes his mind on it, go on with the listing operation.)
28. HAS THE ITEM ALREADY BEEN GIVEN?
(If so, get it back and give it again.)
29. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FOUND PREVIOUSLY?
(If so, find what it was again and give it to pc once more.)
30. HAS AN ITEM NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD?
(If so, work it over with buttons until pc understands it or accepts
or rejects it and go on with listing.)
30A. WAS THE LISTING QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD?
(Get defined and check for read. It may be unreading. If so, indicate
that an uncharged question was listed because it read on a
misunderstood.)
30B. WAS A WORD IN THE QUESTION NOT UNDERSTOOD?
(Same as 30A.)
31. WAS AN ITEM DIFFERENT WHEN SAID BY THE AUDITOR?
(If so, find out what the item was and give it to the pc correctly.)
31A. DID THE AUDITOR SUGGEST ITEMS TO YOU THAT WERE NOT YOURS?
(Indicate as illegal to do so. Correct the list removing these.)
32. WAS NULLING CARRIED ON PAST THE FOUND ITEM?
(If so, go back to it and get in Suppress and Protest.)
33. HAS AN ITEM BEEN FORCED ON YOU?
(If so, get off the reject and suppress and get the listing action
completed to the right item if possible.)
34. HAS AN ITEM BEEN EVALUATED?
(If so, get off the disagreement and protest.)
35. HAD EARLIER LISTING BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, locate when and indicate the by-passed charge.)
36. HAS AN EARLIER WRONG ITEM BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, find when and indicate the by-passed charge.)
37. HAS AN EARLIER ARC BREAK BEEN RESTIMULATED?
(If so, locate and indicate the fact by itsa earlier similar itsa.)
38. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK BECAUSE OF BEING MADE TO DO THIS?
(If so, indicate it to the pc, check the question if reads. Get
earlier similar itsa.)
39. HAS THE LIST CORRECTION BEEN OVERRUN?
(If so, rehab.)
39A. WAS THE LIST DONE WHILE YOU ALREADY HAD AN ARC BRK, PTP, OR W/H?
39B. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE?
39C. COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THE AUDITOR?
39D. DIDN'T THE AUDITOR ACKNOWLEDGE YOU?
40. IS THERE SOME OTHER KIND OF BY-PASSED CHARGE?
(If so, find what and indicate it to pc.)
41. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE?
(If so, indicate it to pc.)
42. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED?
(If so, indicate it to the pc.)
43. HAS A LIST PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN?
(If so, find which one and rehab.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.rw.dz.rr.nt.bh
Copyright �1968, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JUNE 1972R
REVISED 15 OCTOBER 1974
Remimeo
Class IV
(Cancels BTB 24 March 1973R,
"PTS RD Errors".)
PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP
The following is an additional step to the PTS Rundown developed by me
and tested at Flag. This step is run after each terminal is run, to
prevent by-passing charge.
THE STEPS ARE:
1. Select the terminal already run in R3 R and Ruds.
2. Clear "can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE
ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T
WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two.
3. Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator
repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to others,
others to terminal (four flows of two commands each).
4. After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective Havingness
should be run. Then the next PTS RD item is taken up, run R3R and Ruds
then can't have/enforced have.
THE COMMANDS:
FLOW ONE: 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you?
2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want?
FLOW TWO: 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)?
2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it)
didn't want?
FLOW 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others?
THREE: 2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want?
FLOW 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)?
THREE (A): 2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she,
it) didn't
want?
-OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS-
THEORY
The theory is that SPs are SPs because they deny Hav and enforce
unwanted Hav. They also deny do and enforce unwanted do. They also deny be
and enforce unwanted be. This is why we have never before been able to run
subjective Hav. It collided with SPs, Overts, and Withholds on them.
A very full Rundown then would be to start with don't be, must be; go
on to don't do, must do; end up with can't have, enforced have. (Not to be
run at this time.) Hav alone should handle without resorting to be or do.
END OFF AT ONCE AND BEGIN OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS IF THE TA SOARS OR THE
PC CAVES IN. If this does not handle, then do a C/S 53RH at once and
handle.
PTS RD NOTES
With the issue of HCO B 17 Mar 74, "TWC, Using Wrong Questions", it
becomes necessary to convert the PTS RD 2wcs for items into L&N questions.
Example: Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you?
L&N to BD F/N item.
Avoid listing the same question twice. The L&N for places and planets
should be restricted to planets only on VA pcs and an L4BR used at the
first sign of trouble.
Additional PTS RD items can be obtained from past PTS Interviews. Done
by L&N the RD is very powerful and direct The pc must be well set up for it
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JUNE 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 36
GRAMMAR
In all word clearing all Grammatical Words and small words SHOULD BE
LOOKED UP IN A SIMPLE GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK.
Very few dictionaries have full definitions for such words AND THEY
HAVE NO EXAMPLES.
Words like "a" "the" "and" are really parts of language construction
and are more complex than they at first appear.
A Word Clearing Auditor should have a simple grammar book to hand as
well as dictionaries.
The best Grammar textbooks are those compiled for persons foreign to a
language, like immigrants. These do not contain the supposition that the
student is already an English professor.
Lots of EXAMPLES is the real test of a good grammar.
When doing the Study Tapes or Student Hat lack of a simple grammar
textbook can really throw the student off. .
Those "simple" words can be the huge rocks that stand on the highway to
becoming a WORD CLEAR.
So a Grammar is needed.
If a student is VERY deficient (lacking) in grammar it is best to make
him do a whole simple grammar text first before he begins to get into just
words. The words won't hang together for him.
It takes less time to do a short textbook in Grammar than it does to
struggle with grammar all the way through.
Grammar can look like a ghastly subject until one really looks at it. Then
it's easy.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1972
Issue I
REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974
(Only change is signature)
Remimeo
BYPASSED CHARGE
The mechanism of BPC (By-Passed Charge) must be known to an auditor
otherwise he won't know what he's "Indicating".
When one gets a lock, a lower earlier incident restimulates, THAT IS
BPC. It isn't the auditor by-passing it. One handled later charge that
restimmed earlier charge. THAT IS BPC (Tech of '62), and that is all that
the term means.
[pic]
Auditor touches on A, and B goes into restim out of pc's consciousness.
This causes an irritated, ARC Breaky, upset feeling. The pc reacts very
badly. He has been hit by a mystery. There is no apparent reason (to him)
why he feels this way. This is what Bypassed Charge means. "Earlier Charge
Restimmed and not seen" would be another name for it.
One handles it by noting the fact that it happened. One tells the pc an
earlier incident went into restimulation. This usually cools it off.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 JUNE 1972
Remimeo
Data Series 26
Establishment Officer Series 18
LENGTH OF TIME TO EVALUATE
It will be found that long times required to do an Evaluation can be
traced each time to AN INDIVIDUAL WHY FOR EACH EVALUATOR.
These, however, can be summarized into the following classes of Whys:
This list is assessed by a Scientology Auditor on a Meter. The handling
directions given in each case are designations for auditing actions as done
by a Scientology Auditor and are given in the symbols he would use.
1. Misunderstood Words. ________
Handled with Word Clearing (Method 1 and Method 4 of
the Word Clearing Series.)
2. Inability to Study and an inability to learn the materials.
________
(Handled by a Study Correction List HCO B 4 Feb 72.)
3. Outpoints in own thinking. ________
(Handled by what is called an HC [Hubbard Consultant]
List HCO B 28 August 70.)
4. Personal out-Ethics. ________
(Use P/L 3 May 72 by an auditor. Has two Listing and
Nulling type lists.)
5. Doing something else. ________
(2-way communication on P/L 3 May 72 or reorganization.)
6. Impatient or bored with reading. ________
(Achieve Super-Literacy. LRH Executive Directive 178
International. )
7. Doesn't know how to read statistics so doesn't know where
to begin. ________
(Learn to read stats from Management by Stat P/Ls.)
8. Doesn't know the scene. ________
(Achieve familiarity by direct observation.)
9. Reads on and on as doesn't know how to handle and is stalling.
________
(Get drilled on actual handling and become Super-Literate.)
10. Afraid to take responsibility for the consequences if wrong.
________
(HCO B 10 May 72, "Robotism". Apply it.)
11. Falsely reporting. ________
(Pull all withholds and harmful acts on the subject.)
12. Assumes the Why before starting. ________
(Level IV Service Facsimile Triple Auditing.)
13. Feels stupid about it. ________
(Get IQ raised by general processing.)
14. Has other intentions. ________
(Audit on L9S or Expanded Dianetics.)
15. Has other reasons not covered in above. ________
(Listing and Nulling to Blowdown F/N Item on the list.)
16. Has withholds about it. ________
(Get them off.)
17. Has had wrong reasons found. ________
(C/S Series 78.)
18. Not interested in success. ________
(P/L 3 May 72 and follow as in 14 above.)
19. Some other reason. ________
(Find it by 2-way comm.)
20. No trouble in the first place. ________
(Indicate it to person.)
When this list is assessed one can easily spot Why the person is having
trouble with the Data Series or applying it. When these reasons are
handled, one can then get the series restudied and word cleared and
restudied and it will be found that Evaluations are much easier to do and
much more rapidly done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JUNE 1972
Remimeo
Cramming
IMPORTANT
C/S Series 80
"DOG PCs"
AN AUDITOR WHO CANNOT AUDIT, WHOSE TRs ARE OUT, WHOSE METERING IS BAD
AND WHO NEVER KEEPS THE CODE ALWAYS SAYS HIS PCs ARE DOGS.
When you find an auditor on this route, the remedy is:
1. Show him this HCO B and explain to him that an auditor is not likely
to get any real results when he is so out of ARC with pcs.
2. P/L 3 May 72, 2 lists L & N by an auditor.
3. Get off his overts and omissions on pcs and pull his w/hs.
4. Check out his meter position so that he can see needle, paper and pc
all in the same look without eye shift and drill him to do so.
5. Educate his left thumb so that he corrects a TA on BDs and catches
the F/N and doesn't leave the needle stuck to the right of the dial
while the pc F/Ns and corrects only after the F/N has been O/R.
6. Make him do an Electronic attest and get his TRs up to where the pc
has a chance to be in session.
7. WC M4 him on his materials so he isn't swimming in misunderstoods.
8. Tell him there are no dog pcs now and get busy and help them out.
WHOLE HGC
An entire HGC can go bad this way. Shortly afterwards it will
disintegrate and you will have few or no auditors left.
Some auditor who is covering up his overts, false bonuses or false
stats begins it and it becomes "fashionable" to call various pcs dogs. Then
other auditors, finding this an easy way to justify not trying hard, follow
suit.
Next thing you have no HGC.
C/S ERROR
A C/S can err by being too critical of auditors. Or worse he can err
by agreeing about what dogs the pcs are. If he does HE HAS NOT REALIZED
THAT HIS C/S EFFORTS ARE BEING WASTED BY THE AUDITOR'S OVERTS, FALSE
REPORTS, METERING, CODE AND TR FLUBS.
The way to handle this in the C/S is:
1. 3 May 72 P/L.
2. M4 on the C/S Series.
3. Require he listen to and okay ok to audit tapes.
4. Get him to come down on critical auditors with the above cramming
action.
Suddenly this C/S will begin to get wins.
CASES
Every "dog pc" investigated traced to incompetent programming, C/Sing,
out TRs, bad metering, Code breaks and bad lists.
By forcing an auditor to cool off his opinions and properly handle the
pc, each one of these "dog pcs" has begun to fly.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ne.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JUNE 1972R
REVISED 27 FEBRUARY 1975
Remimeo
C/S Series 81R
(Revisions in this type style on next page
to make D of P and D of Ts stats very clear)
AUDITOR'S RIGHTS MODIFIED
It occasionally (rarely) happens that an HGC's line stops and programs
do not get finished and pcs go unaudited or sent to Ethics or Cramming
instead of getting their programs completed.
It also happens that a D of P becomes incapable of getting auditors to
audit per the schedule he writes.
121/2 hour intensives drop out. Auditing falls back to the bit and
piece game.
The C/S finds all his work in programming wasted as the programs stale
date or just get abandoned.
Hours fall. Lines tangle. Tech Services cannot get assignments done.
THE MAJOR WHY OF THIS AND MANY SUCH CONFUSIONS CAN BE TRACED TO AN
ABUSE OF "AUDITORS' RIGHTS" IN PICKING AND CHOOSING PCS ON THE GROUNDS OF
"FEELING THEY CANNOT HELP THE PC".
This "right" is also abused by auditors seeking pcs who F/N easily at
the Examiner.
See HCO B 15 June 72, C/S Series 80, "Dog Pcs".
The refusal to audit is in fact an admission, in most cases, of a
feared inability to audit.
Therefore, an auditor may only refuse to audit a pc if a direct
personal relationship exists such as husband and wife or some friend's wife
or familial relationship.
An auditor advising others about this or that "dog case" or seeking to
exclude pcs from auditing by abusing his "right to choose pcs" is SUBJECT
TO COMM EV AND SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATES UNTIL RETREADED.
For the real why of it is his inability to handle TRs, meter, use the
Code or apply Tech.
Nearly every "Dog Pc" has out lists or incomplete chains or is not
being run on what needs to be handled. In other words they are simply
problems in repair which modern tech handles easily. The drug case who is
audited on grades but has had no drug rundown is an example of
misprogramming.
The C/S can get many loses and the whole HGC go into a bedlam where you
have auditors refusing to audit. Their reasons given are false. The real
reasons involve fast F/Ns and bonuses or out TRs, metering, Code breaks and
tech.
The D of P has a right, and so does Tech Services, to assign pcs to such
and such auditors in the sequence listed without a lot of pick and choose
by the auditors.
A C/S has a right to get his programs completed.
121/2 hour intensive plans blow up where auditors choose their own pcs.
STATS
The stats of C/Ses and auditors may only be HOURS AUDITED with FES and
admin hours separately noted.
The D of P's stat may only be fully completed cases.
When the stats are this way the C/S can get his programs done without
worry.
The D of P can get cases completed.
The D of Tech Services has only completed cases and course completions-
for a stat.
HONESTY
Sanity is truth.
Truth is sanity.
The road to truth is begun with honesty.
There was the story of the "man who sold his soul for a mess of
pottage" (soup). We could parallel this with the Auditor who sold his case
gain for a mess of false stats.
An honest clean job and an honest clean line are the milestones of the
road to truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:sb.nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO B is added to by BTB 28 December 1972RA, Revised and Reissued 25
July 1974, C/S Series 81-1RA, Auditor's Rights Addition Revised, which can
be found in the C/S Series Volume, page 227.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 37
DINKY DICTIONARIES
(Dinky: Small, insignificant.)
In learning the meaning of words small dictionaries are very often a
greater liability than they are a help.
The meanings they give are often circular: Like "CAT: An Animal."
"ANIMAL: A Cat." They do not give enough meaning to escape the circle.
The meanings given are often inadequate to get a real concept of the
word.
The words are too few and even common words are often missing.
HUGE dictionaries can also be confusing as the words they use to define
are often too big or too rare and make one chase through 20 new words to
get the meaning of the original.
The best dictionaries are the very large child's dictionaries like THE
WORLD BOOK DICTIONARY (A Thomdike-Bamhart Dictionary published exclusively
for Field Enterprises Educational Corporation, Merchandise Mart Plaza,
Chicago, Illinois 60654 or Doubleday and Company. Thomdike-Barnhart has a
whole series of dictionaries of which this is a special one. Field
Enterprises has offices in Chicago, London, Rome, Sydney, Toronto. The
World Book Dictionary is in two volumes, each 281/2 cm [11 1/4 inches] by
22 cm [8 5/8 inches] by 5.8 cm [21/4 inches], so it is no small
dictionary!) (Also it defines Dianetics correctly and isn't determined on a
course of propaganda to re-educate the public unlike Merriam Webster's
dictionaries.)
Little pocket book dictionaries may have their uses for traveling and
reading newspapers, but they do get people in trouble. I have seen people
find a word in them and then look around in total confusion. For the dinky
dictionary did not give the full meaning or the second meaning they really
needed.
So the dinky dictionary may fit in your pocket but not in your mind.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1972
Issue I
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 38
METHOD 5
Method 5 Word Clearing is a System wherein the word clearer feeds words
to the person and has him define each. It is called Material Clearing.
Those the person cannot define must be looked up.
This method may be done without a meter. It can also be done with a
meter.
The reason the Method is needed is because the person often does not
know that he does not know. Therefore Method 4 has its limitations as the
meter does not always read.
The actions are very precise.
The word clearer asks "What is the definition of_____?" The person
gives it. If there is any doubt whatever of it, or if the person is the
least bit hesitant, the word is looked up in a proper dictionary.
This method is the method used to clear words or auditing commands or
auditing lists.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1972
Issue II
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 39
METHOD 6
Method 6 Word Clearing is called KEY WORD CLEARING.
It is used on posts and specific subjects.
It is a heavier form than Method 5.
Method 6 is used without a meter.
Where a person is new on post or new to a subject or where there has
just been a goof, an error or an Ethics action, these steps are done in the
following manner.
1. The Word Clearer makes a list of the KEY (or most important)
words relating to the person's duties or post or the new subject.
This is made up as a list. The Word Clearer looks up each word in the
dictionary and writes down the definitions.
The list may have as few as three words or as many as twenty or thirty.
(Example: A bank clerk's key words would be "bank" "clerk" "money"
"cash" "drafts" "teller" "accounts" "customer" etc.)
(Example: There has just been a goof resulting in an upset. The goof
centered around "radio" "repairs" "operation" "operator" "electronics"
etc.)
2. The Word Clearer, without showing the person the definitions,
asks him to define each word.
3. The Word Clearer checks the definition on his list for general
correctness- not word for word but meaning.
4. Any slow or hesitancy or misdefinition is met with having the
person look the word up and look up any word in the definition the person
does not have a grasp of.
5. One completes his list.
6. By then the person has been jarred into looking further by the
above actions. The Word Clearer asks "What other word relating to your post
(or subject or error) didn't you understand?"
7. Each one mentioned is now defined by looking it up.
8. The person can now be Method 4ed relating to his post to be
sure all is clean and there are no upsets.
Note: Where the person has just had an accident or ethics action it may
be necessary to delay the action until the person is calmer or not so upset
as the action can be a heavy distraction if the person is hurt or
frightened and will not be successful.
IT WILL BE FOUND THAT LAZINESS, INACTIVITY, SLOWNESS AND ERRORS ON A
POST OR IN USING A SUBJECT TRACE TO MISUNDERSTOOD KEY WORDS.
THE REMEDY IS WC METHOD 6.
LRH: nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1972
Issue III
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 40
METHOD 7
Whenever one is working with children or foreign language persons or
semiliterates Method 7 READING ALOUD is used.
In this method the person is made to read aloud to find out what he is
doing.
It is a very simple method. It is done without a meter.
It is used on such persons before other methods in order to get the
person untangled.
If a person does not seem to be progressing by studying silently, one
has him read aloud.
Another copy of the same text must also be followed by the Word Clearer
as the person reads.
Startling things can be observed.
The person may omit the word "is" whenever it occurs. The person
doesn't read it. He may have some strange meaning for it like "Israel"
(actual occurrence).
He may omit "didn't" each time it occurs and the reason traced to not
knowing what the apostrophe is (actual occurrence).
He may call one word quite another word such as "stop" for "happen" or
"green" for "mean".
He may hesitate over certain words.
The procedure is
1. Have him read aloud.
2. Note each omission or word change or hesitation or frown as he
reads and take it up at once.
3. Correct it by looking it up for him or explaining it to him.
4. Have him go on reading, noting the next omission, word change
or hesitation or frown.
5. Repeat steps 2 to 4.
By doing this a person can be brought up to literacy.
His next actions would be learning how to use a dictionary and look up
words.
Then a simple grammar.
A very backward student can be boosted up to literacy by this method.
LRH: nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JUNE 1972
Issue IV
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 41
METHOD 8
(If a student has trouble with this Method he should do Method 7 first.
Method One should also be done.)
Method 8 is an action used in the "Primary Rundown" where one is
studying Study Tech or where one is seeking a full grasp of a subject. Its
End Product is SUPER-LITERACY.
The steps are these:
Usually an alphabetical list of every word or term in the text of a
paper, a chapter or a recorded tape is available or provided.
1. The person looks up each word on the alphabetical list and uses
each in sentences until he has the meaning conceptually.
The words are looked up in a big dictionary.
The grammatical words or small words are looked up in a simple grammar.
If the person has too much trouble with grammar he should do the whole
simple grammar text before going on.
Any technical terms not in the dictionary are looked up in a technical
dictionary or glossary or in bulletins on the materials, i.e. a
photographic dictionary.
This is not done for the whole subject, it is done for a paper or a
chapter or one tape of a series.
2. One then reads or listens to the paper, chapter or tape for its
sense or general meaning.
3. Method 4 is then done on the person to find any misunderstoods.
4. These are cleared up per Method 4 procedure.
5. The person reads or listens to the material again.
6. The person is again checked for any misunderstoods.
7. If there are any misunderstoods the person again does steps 4 &
5.
8. When the material is fully heard or understood as per above
steps and checks, end off on that paper, chapter, tape and go on to the
next one.
9. An alphabetical list is made or exists for the next paper,
chapter or tape. Steps l to 8 are done on it.
10. Each succeeding paper or chapter or tape is done with steps 1
to 8.
When all the material has been done in this way, the person will be fully
able to apply all the material.
Usually Method 8 is reserved for the Scientology Study Tapes which
contain how to study and the Student Hat.
It can also be used to master a major subject.
IT WILL BE FOUND THAT METHOD 8 (or Method 2 or 3 or 4 or 6) ARE VERY
LENGTHY AND HARD TO DO UNLESS ONE HAS FIRST HAD A METHOD ONE WORD CLEARING.
A Word Clearing Correction List is used on Method 8 whenever a student
bogs heavily. This list will, when assessed on a meter properly, locate the
errors and they can be corrected.
When used on the Study Tech itself and Student Hat, Method 8 HONESTLY
DONE makes a person SUPER-LITERATE. It is like hearing and seeing and
reading for the first time!
Reading a text or instruction or book is comfortable. One has it in
conceptual form. One can APPLY the material learned.
It is a new state.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JULY 1972
Issue I
Remimeo
PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN HANDLING
(Refers to HCO B 30 March 72, Revised 30 May 72,
"Primary Correction Rundown")
Students who struggle with the Primary Rundown (HCO B 4 Apr 72, Revised
30 May 72) are given the PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN.
Steps 1 to 9 of the PCRD (per HCO B 30 March 72, Revised 30 May 72) are
paid for by the pc quite in addition to his Primary Rundown.
IF available auditors exist on Course of a proper class and the pc is a
student then these steps I to 9 PCRD may be done on a co-audit basis. BUT
IF NOT WELL DONE OR MESSED UP OR DELAYED MUST BE DONE BY A PROFESSIONAL
AUDITOR AT THE STUDENT'S OWN EXPENSE.
A STAFF MEMBER stalled on the Primary Rundown is put through the PCRD
in Qual or Qual and HGC for different steps.
Qualifications is the Correction Division. PCRD is a Correction action.
There should be word clearers in Qual. And these as Class IIIs should be
competent to do steps I to 9 of the PCRD.
The object of a PCRD is not to stall the person and keep him off the
PRD.
The purpose of the PCRD is to get the person through the PRD.
Where people have been put off the PRD for any reason and are not
industriously going through the PCRD IT IS UP TO QUAL TO MAKE SURE THEY DO
GET THROUGH PCRD AND PRD.
Orgs that off load pcs or students on the thinnest excuses or Qual
Divisions that will not service and speed the lines have to be watched as
the discovery of trouble on the PRD can be used to simply halt the student
or pc. Instead of picking up the ball, a Qual has been known to just send
students back to class without handling or put students to "doing their
hats" or other nonsense.
The idea is to complete somebody on what they are supposed to complete.
FOLDER STUDY
If you study the person's folder, particularly a staff member's, you
will probably find that several of the steps 1 to 9 have already been done.
These are checked off as done on the PCRD checklist.
Any org that is worthy of the name has folder summaries in the inside
left-hand cover of the current folder. It is very easy to locate what have
been done.
OUT LISTS
It is not at all rare to find that various "whys have been found" but
that the person is not doing well. This is a case of WRONG ITEMS and is
handled by C/S Series 78. Thus steps I, 2, 3 and 6 of the PCRD may consist
mainly of correcting botched up lists.
IDLE STUDENT
The problem of putting someone off the PRD onto the PCRD is that he is
now "idle as a student". He cannot go forward on his studies as he has not
done his PRD.
In fact going on studying without the PRD is a waste of time as it's
mainly misunderstood, glib and won't be applied. It is actually faster to
do a PRD (or a PCRD) and then study than it is to study without the PRD or
PCRD. And it is certainly far more effective.
The thing to do is to get the student who is assigned to the PCRD
through the PCRD.
As noted above he may have several points already done. And the rest
can be done easily and fast.
RESISTIVE STUDENTS
There are situations where you have students or even executives who
will not even go to study.
These are of course people who need the PCRD worst.
But how to get them available even for that?
In the case of a senior executive who will not study you can get a
disarrangement of the study lines as they won't push and will even impede
study-for instance by not making staff go to study time or preventing them
from going. Also policy and HCO Bs fall out or are not enforced and form of
org is not held since reading and study are similar actions so standard
actions are not known.
Naturally such a thing has to be handled very fast.
Because cooperation from such a student is VERY limited, time to do a
whole PCRD is not possible.
PRE-PCRD
There is a PRE-PCRD action that handles this.
It has 2 steps.
A. Assess Method 5 C/S 53RC. Take the LFBD item and INDICATE it to
the person. Don't handle it or the rest of 53RC. Just Indicate it
to the pc. He will usually agree and cognite. The TA will come down
further and the needle will float. That's it.
B. Now take the Study Correction List. Assess it Method 5. Pick
out the biggest LFBD you got. Indicate it to the pc. He will
cognite, the TA will drop down and an F/N will occur. That's it.
C. Put these 2 sheets in his pc folder for full handling of all
reads by his auditor and add them to the pc's auditing program
sheet inside the left front cover of the pc's folder.
The result will often be magical. The person will become more agreeable
about study or the Primary Correction Rundown.
Of course they should now get a Primary Correction Rundown of which C/S
53RC is the first step anyway.
This Pre-PCRD gets them started. And it only takes a little while.
The End Phenomena of a Primary Correction Rundown is "Can he now
quickly and easily do the Primary Rundown?" If yes, and if it works out in
practice that he can, that's it. Let him onto the Primary RD. But if he
bogs, back to the PCRD.
MORAL
The moral of this HCO B is get them through the Primary Rundown. If
they can't or don't go, do the PCRD. And if they're shunted to the PCRD get
it DONE. And get them to the real EP which is SUPER LITERACY. The moral is,
get them through. Don't idle about. Get it DONE.
Then they will whizz along on fast flow study and you've got
COMPLETIONS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JULY 1972
Issue II
Remimeo
DISTRACTIVE AND ADDITIVE QUESTIONS
AND ORDERS
Recently there have come up many instances of auditors asking odd non-
process questions while "doing a process" and giving odd orders.
Example: While running a process an auditor also kept asking, "Is your
attention on something else?"
This is of course a daffy thing to do. The auditor's TRs or metering go
out. Then the auditor badgers the pc with strange irrelevant questions.
These are distractions, nothing more nor less. Not all the silly questions
in the world substitute for lack of TRs and proper metering. A question
about "What else are you doing?" does not substitute for having by-passed
an F/N or running an uncharged item.
Giving Orders that are not part of any process is very bad.
Example: Auditor has missed a read, by-passed an F/N and goofing it
generally. Pc gets dull, disinterested. Auditor says, "Come back into the
room!"
Evaluation fits into this set of bad tricks. Like, "You are really OT
you know. You just think you're aberrated." Or "You better tell the
Examiner you are really Clear." Or "You are in pretty bad shape unless you
can see the whole building." These of course are suppressive Evaluations.
In 1950 there was a general observation. ALL AUDITORS TALK TOO MUCH.
As we seem to be in a period of additive questions and comments, the
observation can be made again.
MUZZLED auditing means stating only the model session patter and
Commands and TRs. It ALWAYS gets the best results.
Do NOT add a lot of questions or orders to a session to cover up goofs
in standard tech.
Standard Tech works. Use it and it only.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1972
(Amended & Reissued 28 March 1974
-only change is Series No.)
Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Series 6
C/S Series 82
DIANETIC HCO B
INTEREST
On two certain subjects the "Interest?" question is omitted from
Dianetic R3R patter.
On drugs and when running Evil Purposes or Intentions one does NOT ask
the pc if he is interested in running the item.
The requirement on both drug items and intentions is that the item read
on the meter (suppress and inval can be used) and has not been run by R3R
previously.
Many pcs, it has now been found, have replied "No, no interest" on a
drug item, the item has not been run and the pc then continued to have
trouble with drugs.
Checking back pcs who returned to drugs after auditing showed "drug
rundowns" that were so brief as to be nothing. One pc who had been on LSD
for years had only a I hour quickie drug rundown. Later this person
relapsed.
Tracing this, in each case the "Interest?" question had been used and
the pc had replied "No interest" BUT MEANT "I'M NO LONGER INTERESTED IN
DRUGS."
So Drug items that have read are run R3R without asking for interest.
The command is simply omitted.
In Expanded Dianetics the same thing has occurred in running Evil
Purposes or Intentions. The Auditor asked the pc if he was interested in
running the item and the pc said "No" and so it went untouched. But the pc
had it confused with interest in doing the purpose and missed running it
and then fell on his head later. Tracing the case back it was found that
R/Ses and such had not been run due to the pc saying "No Interest".
Nothing bad will happen if the item is run.
C/S RESPONSIBILITY
The C/S must keep telling his auditors, on drugs or Expanded Dianetics,
"Omit asking for interest on R3R on these (drug) (intentions). Run them if
they read on the meter."
REPAIR
In repairing cases it is good sense to check this point on drugs and
intentions to see if they were neglected in R3R due to "no interest".
If so, then have them run and the case will suddenly do well.
LRH:nt.ntm jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 AUGUST 1972R
CORRECTED AND REISSUED 15 AUGUST 1972
Remimeo Correction in This type style
BPI
All Students
Tech Dept
Qual
"The Auditor"
REGISTRARS
FAST FLOW TRAINING
References: LRH ED 178 INT of 30 May 72 SUPER-LITERACY
HCO B 4 Apr 72 Revised 30 May 72 PRIMARY RUNDOWN REVISED
HCO B 30 Mar 72 Revised 30 May 72 PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN
HCO B 20 July 72 Issue I PCRD HANDLING
HCO B 15 July 71 Issue III C/S Series 48R DRUG HANDLING
HCO B 25 Oct 71 Issue II (as revised) THE SPECIAL DRUG RUNDOWN
So that there is NO question about what is meant by FAST FLOW TRAINING:
ANY STUDENT WHO HONESTLY COMPLETES THE PRIMARY RUNDOWN OR PRIMARY
CORRECTION RUNDOWN IS THEREAFTER DESIGNATED A "FAST FLOW STUDENT".
The Fast Flow Student passes courses by attestation at Certs and Awards
to the effect that he (a) has enrolled properly on the course, (b) has paid
for the course, (c) has studied and understands the materials, (d) has done
the drills, (e) can produce the result required in the materials.
The student is given a PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE. This looks like any
other certificate but is not gold sealed and has Provisional plainly on it.
In the case of an Auditor, an Interneship or formal auditing experience
is required. When actual honest evidence is presented to C&A that he has
demonstrated that he can produce flubless results his Certificate is
VALIDATED with a gold seal and is a permanent certificate.
In Administrative Courses or course of any kind not having to do with
auditing, the same procedure is followed and a PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE is
issued by C&A.
The person must now demonstrate that he can apply the materials studied
by producing an honest, actual statistic in the materials studied. He
presents this evidence to C&A and receives a VALIDATION gold seal on his
Certificate.
Provisional Certificates EXPIRE after one year if not Validated.
The Fast Flow Student studies within his knowledge of study tech. He is
assisted by Supervisors. Any Word Clearing action needed can be done on
him. He can be sent to Qual and Crammed. He can be starrated and made to
clay demo by the Supervisor.
He does not however have to have a twin, he does not automatically
starrate starrate items, he does not have to have an examination.
The Fast Flow System makes for very rapid training. This becomes
possible due to the development of the Primary Rundown and Primary
Correction Rundown.
PREREQUISITES
Primary Rundown or Primary Correction Rundown are required for Levels O
to I V or above and for FEBC. They are not required for HSDC or the many
other courses below these levels.
NON PRDs
Those students who have not had a Primary Rundown or Primary Correction
Rundown must starrate, clay demo, twin and go through the materials as many
times as required, using the entirety of the Student Hat.
It is much faster to do the PRD or PCRD first.
DRUG CASES
Where a drug case cannot be gotten through Method One Word Clearing due
to case, it is usual to give him the Drug Rundown first as per HCO B of 25
Oct 71 Issue II, "The Special Drug RD".
The short co-audit version is contained in HCO B 15 July 71 Issue III,
C/S Series 48R.
Where for any reason the person cannot get the Drug Rundown HE MAY BE
ENROLLED ON THE DIANETICS COURSE, BECOME A DIANETIC AUDITOR and obtain the
Drug Rundown through CO-AUDIT on Course.
The Dianetic Course in this instance is done with the full Student Hat
requirements.
DESIGNATION
The FAST FLOW STUDENT should be given a blue lapel award and wear it in
Class. It should say FFS on it in black letters.
This gives the green light to rapid and effective completion of courses
for the SUPER-LITERATE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.sb.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 AUGUST 1972
Remimeo
C/S Series 84
FLUBLESS C/SING
A C/S cannot C/S flublessly while he has ANY Auditors flubbing.
The standard procedure is
1. The C/S makes sure Tech Courses are taught okay and raises hell
until they are.
2. C/S makes sure Qual has a Cramming Officer and crams him until
he gets flubless Cramming and can Supervise TRs, do WCing Method 7,
Method 6, Method 4, can correct metering and has packs to hand for
reference.
3. The C/S follows a very standard handling of auditors:
A. 1 error of any kind-instruct by reference to HCO B.
B. A second error of any kind-send to Cramming and get the
Auditor crammed at once, without any loss of auditing time but
before the Auditor is allowed to audit further. (This is 2
hours, not 2 days!)
C. A third error of any kind-RETREAD, wherein the Auditor's
weak areas are located and the Auditor has to M7, M6, M4 and
restudy the materials of that area. This takes the Auditor back
to Step A.
A retread under a good Super takes 4 or 5 days.
Now if the Auditor again errs he goes to Step A.
If he goes the route again he hits RETRAIN and is retrained fully like
any other student. His PRD is done or verified and he goes through the
course starting with basic books. This puts the Auditor back to A.
But if he now lands at RETRAIN again he is given a full and complete
RETRAIN from his earliest contacts with the subject.
It is highly unlikely he will flub further but if he does, he should
not be on auditing at all.
FALSE REPORTS
A falsified Auditing report puts the Auditor at once at retrain as he
is not sufficiently aware of the potentials of the subject to know he can
get results and does not have to be dishonest.
TR 0
OT Zero and TR 0 are the keys to good auditing.
2 C/Ses were found in orgs who "wouldn't let the Auditors do TR 0
because of their cases". Both orgs had horrible stats and bad results and
ARC Broken fields.
OT Zero and TR 0 are a routine action for Auditors. They do TRs in
spare time, not because they are being Crammed, just to get professional.
Every Cramming Order includes TRs, especially Zero, to also be done on
the auditor's own time.
This gets the Auditor up to really Confronting. His errors come mainly
from an inability to confront (and from faulty metering or misunderstoods
or out ethics).
OT Zero and TR 0 are the keys to flubless auditing.
ELECTRONIC ATTEST
Auditors using LRH tapes and electronic attest (and with OT Zero, TR 0,
metering, and Mis Us cleaned up and Ethics in) become very spectacular
auditors in terms of results.
Results bring pride.
Auditors who get results are happy auditors. And the above is how, the
standard how, to get them to get results.
EASY C/SING
Only if he spends some of his time TRAINING, as above, can a C/S ever
get down to really C/Sing cases and getting programmes DONE.
SUMMARY
The above is the way I C/S and handle Auditors as a C/S.
I long since found that the flubby Auditors were the ones who consumed
the C/S time. The ratio is 21/2 hours to 61/2 hours wherein it only takes
me 21/2 hours to C/S piles of folders when I have the auditors auditing
honestly and flublessly and it takes me 61/2 hours when I have some
flubbers.
It is neither kind nor decent to let Auditors lose. Only when I (or
MSH) have not been doing the C/Sing has auditing gone wrong in any area
where I was.
This is traced directly to the drop-out of the above actions. So it is
the above actions which give standard results and any C/S who omits them
(to be a good fellow, or "these are my friends") is an Auditor killer.
Auditors sometimes achieve a high status and are "above being crammed".
Well watch it, watch it because they will fall on their heads with a crash.
An auditor is not unlike a race horse. He needs a lot of care and
handling. And he needs his periodic drills and exercises or he goes sloppy.
Like a race horse, a good auditor is very, very valuable. And all good
auditors are made by C/Ses!
The proof is that even the best go bad when they no longer have a tight
C/S rein. Experience has taught that. The exceptions are very, very few and
you don't have any of them.
It takes me about 3 or 4 weeks to get an auditor through his course and
doing a good flubless job. The majority of Scientologists want to be
auditors. So you have Auditor scarcity? That's a laugh.
It's the C/S! The Course Super, the Cramming Officer.
And it's done just exactly as above.
Given the materials, there is no other answer. So stop dreaming of
hiring or getting perfect Auditors.
The ones you have are fine. Get more.
And do the above! ! !
The auditors must not blame the pc (nor must you), the C/S must not
blame the auditor.
It's you, the Course Super and the Cramming Officer. And mainly you the
C/S.
You can and must build a corps of good auditors.
Or you'll never make it as a C/S.
And listen, if you don't make it as a C/S, where's the world?
LRH:nt.bh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Added to by BTB 16 Aug 72-1, C/S Series 84-1,
Volume X-235.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 42
METHOD 4 NOTES
Too generalized a question in using Method 4 defeats its use and can
restimulate a person badly.
Example: "Is there anything in college you didn't understand?" That of
course is just plain ridiculous as a question. "Have you ever heard
anything you didn't understand?" would be similarly silly.
BREAK DOWN THE MATERIALS
When doing Method 4 you have to break down the materials (put them into
small separate units) in order to ask questions.
Example: We have Papers l & 2, both on the same subject. The wrong
question for Method 4 would be "Is there anything in Papers l & 2 you
didn't understand?" and not even give him the papers to see! The right way
to do it would be to take Paper 1 and break it down into its obvious
sections, give the person Paper 1 and let him look at it. Point to its 1st
section and say, "Is there anything you didn't understand in this section?"
while watching the meter. Then point to next section, do the same. Finish
Paper l. Then go to Paper 2 and do it the same.
A person has to know what he's being asked about and has to be thinking
of it when asked the question.
TAPES
Just as it would be ridiculous to ask "Have you ever misunderstood
anything you ever read?", it would be silly to ask, "Did you ever have a
misunderstood on Tape?"
The right way is to take the tape and put it on a machine and play a
bit of it. And ask, "Is there anything in the first section of this tape
you didn't understand?" while watching the meter. Then high speed the tape
forward to another area and do the same. Thus the tape is covered.
This can also be done from any tape notes, section by section.
BOOKS
Books are done chapter by chapter.
QUICKIE M4
Method 4 is defeated utterly by
1. Bad metering
2. Too general a question
3. Not having the material to hand
4. Not getting the person's attention on parts of the material.
Quickie M4 misses. It sets the person up for a lose in his studying.
And we want him to actually succeed in his study, don't we?
LRH.sb.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 AUGUST 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 43
GRAMMAR DEFINITION
The following definition of Grammar was taken from the Dictionary of
Contemporary American Usage by Bergen and Cornelia Evans, published by
Random House, New York, in 1957. (It is not a complete Dictionary and would
require another larger dictionary for full word clearing. But it gives
American usage's of words and phrases, which could be important as
Dianetics and Scientology are written in American English.)
It was sent to me by an SHSBC Student who found its definition of
Grammar was very helpful to other students.
This definition also tells you why some college or school texts are so
ghastly hard to read--they are not in standard English. It also tells you
why, in 1950, the head of the English Department in an American University
hailed Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health as marking a new era
of scientific writing. One reason is that it was written by a writer, not a
professor. The other was that it was written in the English that was in
use.
But read the definition:
GRAMMAR
GRAMMAR is a systematic description of the ways in which words are used
in a particular language. The grammarian groups words that behave similarly
into classes and then draws up rules stating how each class of words
behaves. What classes are set up and how the rules are phrased is a matter
of convenience. A grammarian is free to classify his material in any way
that seems reasonable to him. But he is never free to say that certain
forms of speech are unacceptable merely because there is no place for them
in the system he has designed.
THE CLASSES
Most grammarians are interested in a number of languages. As a rule
they set up classes that are useful in handling many languages but that may
have very little meaning for a particular language. For example, the
distinction between the dative him and the accusative him is important in
the Indo-European languages generally. But in a grammar designed solely to
teach English, this distinction does not have to be made. Similarly, there
is an etymological or historical difference between the English gerund in
-ing and the participle in -ing But it is sometimes impossible to say
whether a given word is a gerund or a participle; for example, in journeys
end in lovers meeting. For this reason, some grammarians prefer to handle
these forms together under one name, such as "participle" or "-ing".
The familiar terms of classical grammar are defined in this dictionary
for the convenience of persons who need to use these concepts. But a much
simpler classification, based on the structure of present-day English, is
employed in all the discussions of usage.
THE RULES
In order to say how words are used, the grammarian must examine large
quantities of spoken and written English. He will find some constructions
used so consistently that the exceptions have to be classed as errors. But
he will also find competing, and even contradictory, constructions, which
appear too often to be called mistakes. He must then see whether one of
these expressions is used by one kind of person and not by another or in
one kind of situation and not in another. If he can find no difference of
this sort he accepts the two constructions as interchangeable. In this way
he assembles a body of information on how English words are used that may
also show differences, such as those between one locality and another, or
between spoken and written English, or between literary and illiterate
speech. Studies of this kind are called "scientific" or "descriptive"
grammars. This is a relatively new approach to the problems of language and
the information brought to light in this way is sometimes surprising.
The first English grammarians, writing in the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries, did not attempt to describe the English of their day.
On the contrary, they were attempting to "improve" English and they
demanded Latin constructions which were not characteristic of English. They
objected to the expression I am mistaken, because if translated into Latin
this would mean I am misunderstood. They claimed that unloose must mean
tie, because un is a Latin negative. They objected to the "double negative"
which was good Old English, and also good Greek, but not good Latin.
These eighteenth century rules of prescriptive grammar have been
repeated in school books for two hundred years. They are the rules for a
curious, Latinized English that has never been spoken and is seldom used in
literature, but that is now highly respected in some places, principally in
scientific writing. It should be recognized that these rules were not
designed to "preserve" English, or keep it "pure". They were designed to
create a language which would be "better" simply because it was more like
Latin. Dryden, writing in the seventeenth century, said: "I am often put to
a stand in considering whether what I write be the idiom of the tongue or
false grammar and nonsense, couched beneath that specious name of
Anglicanism, and have no other way to clear my doubts but by translating my
English into Latin and thereby trying what sense the words will bear in a
more stable language." One result of this double translation was that
Dryden went through his earlier works and rewrote all the sentences that
had originally ended in a preposition or adverb. A generation later, Swift
complained that the English of his day "offends against every part of
grammar". Certainly this is blaming the foot because it doesn't fit the
shoe!
Because some people would like to write the language of the textbooks,
the entries in this dictionary not only tell what standing a given
construction has in current English but also explain how the rules of the
prescriptive grammarian would apply, wherever the rules and standard
practice differ. But in such cases the rules are never simple, and the
person who has to use this type of English may feel that it would be easier
to follow Dryden's example and write in Latin first.
THIS BOOK
The grammar entries in this book are designed for persons who speak
standard English but who may be confused about certain isolated points. The
entries are arranged so that the answer to a particular problem can be
found in the least possible time. But anyone who wishes to make a
systematic study of English grammar, using this book, can do so by starting
with the entry parts of speech and following the references to more and
more detailed discussions of each concept.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1972
Remimeo (Amended & Reissued 28 March 1974
All Dn & Ex Dn -only change is Series No.)
Auditors
Class VIII DIANETICS
C/Ses
Expanded Dianetics Series 7
C/S Series 85
CATASTROPHES FROM AND REPAIR OF
"NO INTEREST" ITEMS
I have done a review of several failed cases which blew or went bad
after auditing.
THE COMMON FACTOR IN EVERY ONE WAS CASE BY-PASSED DUE TO "NO INTEREST".
The auditor finds a reading drug item or an evil purpose and proposes
to run R3R on it. The auditor asks if the pc is interested in running it.
The pc says, "No." The auditor does not run it. BANG, we have a BY-PASSED
CASE.
The pc will blow or go sour or not recover.
One of these cases was unchanged after "a drug rundown". He had a pair
of eyes that looked like blank discs. Check of folder showed all major drug
items "not run due to no interest". The solution was to recover the lists,
run the items that had read R3R triple and complete the case.
Another one blew. His folder was examined. Every evil purpose had been
left unrun! Of the items from the "Wants Handled Rundown" the intentions
were mislisted. The drug rundown failed due to "no interest".
Each flubbed case I am finding has had his drug items and evil purposes
left unrun on R3R due to "no interest".
So DON'T ASK FOR INTEREST ON INTENTIONS, EVIL PURPOSES AND DRUG ITEMS.
IF THEY READ, RUN THEM!
REPAIR
1. On any stumbling case that has had a "drug rundown" or Expanded
Dianetics get the Folder FESed to see if reading items were left unrun
on R3R Triple. List them chronologically, early to late.
2. Get the case back, with an R factor of "Incomplete".
3. Run every one of those unrun drug items, intentions and Evil
Purposes.
4. If the items don't now read, then get in Suppress and Invalidate on
them.
5. If the case bogs do L3RD Method 5 and Handle on that chain only.
6. Go on with the action and complete it.
LRH:sb.ntm.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972,1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 NOVEMBER 1972
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 44
ILLITERACY AND WORK
I have been engaged in a study of applications of tech to illiteracy
and illiterate or semi-literate populations and found some simple levels of
approach.
I investigated U.S. AID educational efforts and data to find out why
they failed. For instance, in one project, the U.S. spent over one million
dollars to educate 105 persons from an "underdeveloped" country of low
literacy and surveyed it later to find that none of the data taught was in
use and that no progress had been made by the person or the country as a
result.
Using their data and my own personal investigation in the same country,
I evaluated the situation and found they had not consulted the existing
scene before or during the program. Their training was for a sophisticated
environment.
The country of the program is just emerging from a nomadic level
civilization into agricultural and the agriculture done is extremely
primitive, erodes whole plains with non-contour plowing and doesn't even
know about irrigation.
To these people they taught the highly complex technology of the
electronic age!
The people went back home, found no computers whatever, listened to the
goats and sat down and did nothing.
U.S. AID had no explanation for this. But give them credit-the students
liked the U.S. and U.S. AID did honestly survey and admit the failure, a
rare humility.
From this point I did a local study and found that instead of computers
these people needed-guess what?
TR 2! Acknowledgement. (Training Drill No. 2, How to Acknowledge a
Communication.)
This primitive area had never heard of TR 2!
"Good", "fine", "thank you" were unknown in all their work culture.
Before they saw any need of any technology, they had first to see
that there was any reason to get any work done at all!
Further, their cultural pattern contained dishonesty as a virtue! This
is antipathetic to basic morale no matter what the culture and so they
were in a cultural attitude or pattern which kept them sad, depressed and
miserable! So they couldn't work.
The program, then, had to (a) recover honesty to increase morale, (b)
introduce acknowledgement for accomplishment, (c) establish the possibility
that one could work, (d) introduce statistics so that something existed
that could be acknowledged and (e) establish bonuses for statistics so that
acknowledgement could be real and stay that way.
These items are all very elementary and simple portions of our basic
technology:
(a) Security checking, (b) TRs especially 2, (c) Problems of Work Course
using tape and Word Clearing, (d) Statistical policies and tech, (e) Bonus
policies.
So in U.S. AID Programs there was a skipped gradient in culture (nomad-
agrarian skipped to electronic-nuclear) and a skipped gradient in training-
Why learn when there is no reason to work? So why be literate? Or study?
Any sophisticated technical layout would break down in the hands of
these people-and does.
But this program would lift them up. Then they would have some reason
to study.
Factually, one cannot just sail into a culture blind and bash around
with no data. It is costly and it accomplishes very little.
A basic knowledge of Man is essential to any improvement in any area of
the human race.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1972
Remimeo
TECH SECS Issue II
Ds of T
Students
QUAL SEC
CRAMMING OFFICER
Confessional Pack
STUDENTS WHO SUCCEED
Over the past year I have done considerable research, observation,
pilots and more research on the subject of making successful students.
We have of course excellent study technology which is far in advance of
anything Man has had. It has been developed over a period of 22 years.
Sometimes the student is very slow.
Sometimes he ends off study due to non application.
Sometimes the study tech is not used. When this happens of course the
tech "didn't work" because it was not used.
I have run enough pilots now in order to handle this.
HONESTY
In policy there has long been written the natural sequence of ethics,
tech and administration.
When administration is out, it is necessary to get in tech. When tech
is out it is necessary to get in ethics.
In other words, ethics must be in to get tech in.
ETHICS is a personal thing. By definition, the word means:
"The study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral
choices to be made by the individual in his relationship with others."
(American Heritage Dictionary)
When one is ethical or "has his ethics in" it is by his own
determination and is done by himself.
JUSTICE is the action of the group against the individual when he has
failed to get his own ethics in.
In the culture in which we live, justice is so savage and often so
unreasonable that it tends to inhibit the individual from confessing minor
misdemeanors and Crimes.
This aberrates him because it prevents him from getting off his
withholds.
This leads to bad health, bad eyesight, deafness and other things as
can be proven in auditing results.
IT ALSO LEADS TO OUT COMMUNICATION.
AND IT INHIBITS THE INDIVIDUAL FROM REACHING OUT WITH WHAT HE HAS LEARNED
AND APPLYING IT.
The slow student, the glib student, the student who cannot apply are
all students who are withholding.
This is true of any Course and any materials and has always been true
but no one ever worked it out since they had no real command of the subject
of the mind before Dianetics and Scientology.
The culture itself encourages dishonesty and therefore has not been
able to solve fully the problem of study.
Only an honest student really reads, really does what he is supposed to
do and really applies.
PILOTS
There were several pilot Courses to find this material.
The one which finally proved it was a Course of about 12 students.
They were very slow. They were unable to apply the materials during an
apprenticeship.
It was then found none of them had done an honest Primary Rundown. They
had "know bested" their way through it, cheating, and had falsely attested.
Then further investigation showed each one of them had come to the
Course with his Ethics badly out.
A Confessional was then done on each of them and they were restarted to
again do a full Primary Rundown, Student Hat and the materials.
Only then did they succeed in their application of what was studied.
This was also true of their Supervisors, each one of whom had done his
Supervisor's Course with his Ethics out. So one should not blame the
students only!
A Case Supervisor in training could not Case Supervise well. It was
found he had not even read the case history section sample programs because
"he already knew" yet attested he had. Prior to all this his Ethics were
out.
When his withholds were handled he could then supervise cases and did
well.
CONFESSIONALS
The technology of Confessionals has been upgraded enormously in the
last year.
With this vast improvement it becomes possible to remove the barriers
and counter-intention to getting his Ethics in and studying in an ethical
fashion and being able to reach with the materials studied and so apply
them.
If any student, beginning in a school or on a Course, is given a
standard Confessional before beginning serious study, he will proceed much
more rapidly, will study honestly, will apply study materials and, if
actual study tech is used, will become a successful student of that subject
and will be able to apply what he learns.
Study tech used by itself will succeed somehow in a large number of
cases. But when it is preceded by a well done and thorough Confessional its
results are more thorough and far more rapid.
When I was first working on evaluations of study in 1971 the "dishonesty
factor" appeared as a very general Why. But it was not worked with at that
time as there seemed no easy way to handle it.
By improving the technology of Confessionals on another entirely
different research channel, the problem of the student also became clear.
Only the honest student is a good student and a credit to his class and
the subject and himself.
The only reservation then is that the Confessional itself has to be
done competently and honestly. But honest Confessionals breed honest
Confessional auditors and this can be closely supervised as an expert
action.
This opens the road to improvement and wider success in the already
winning and successful subject of Study Tech.
Man is not happy unless he is honest. White, black, red or brown, this
is true of all times and all races. And it is true of all students in all
schools.
The honest student is the most successful student.
And the technology of the Confessional can make him so, rapidly and
easily.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 DECEMBER l 972R
REVISED & REISSUED 1 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
CANCELS
BTB OF 13 DECEMBER 1972
SAME TITLE
Integrity Processing Series 10R
INTEGRITY PROCESSING QUESTIONS
MUST BE F/Ned
The main danger of Integrity Processing is not probing a person's past
but failing to do so thoroughly.
When you leave an Integrity Processing question "live" and go on to the
next one, you set up a nasty situation that will have repercussions. The
person may not immediately react. But the least that will happen is that he
will be more difficult to audit in the future, and will go out of session
more easily. More violently, a pc who has had an Integrity Processing
question left unflat may leave the session and do himself or Scientology
considerable mischief.
About the most unkind thing you could do to a person would be to leave
an Integrity Processing question unflat and go on to the next one. Or to
fail to obtain an F/N on withholds in the rudiments and go on with the
session.
One girl, being audited, was left unflat on a withhold question. The
Auditor blithely went on to the next question. The girl went out after
session, and told everyone she knew the most vicious lies she could create
about the immoral conduct of Scientologists. She wrote a stack of letters
to people she knew out of town, telling gruesome tales of sexual orgies. An
alert Scientologist heard the rumors, rapidly traced them back, got hold of
the girl, sat her down and checked auditing and found the unflat withhold
question. The withhold? Sexual misdemeanors. Once that was pulled, the girl
hastily raced about correcting all her previous efforts to discredit.
A man had been a stalled case for about a year. He was violent to
audit. The special question was finally asked, "What withhold question was
left unflat on you?" It was found and handled. After that his case
progressed again.
The mechanisms of this are many. The reactions of the pc are many. The
summation of it is, when an Integrity Processing question is left unflat on
a pc and thereafter ignored, the consequences are numerous.
THE REMEDY
The prevention of Integrity Processing being left unflat is easily
accomplished:
1. Develop excellent TRs and Basic Auditing.
2. Know the E-Meter.
3. Work only with an approved E-Meter.
4. Know the various bulletins on Integrity Processing.
5. Get off your own withholds so that you won't avoid those in
others.
6. Apply correct Integrity Processing procedure and handle each
reading question to an honest F/N on that question.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972,1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 DECEMBER 1972R
REVISED 12 FEBRUARY 1973
REISSUED 1 NOVEMBER 1974
(Only change is signature.)
Remimeo
Integrity Processing Series 11R
GENERALITIES WON'T DO
The most efficient way to upset a pc is to leave an Integrity
Processing question unflat. This is remedied by taking each reading
question to an F/N on the question.
The best way to "miss" an Integrity Processing question is to let the
pc indulge in generalities or "I thought ...."
A withhold given as "Oh, I got mad at them lots of times," should be
pulled down to when and where and the first time "you got mad' and finally,
"What did you do to them just before that?" Then earlier similar if no F/N.
The pc who withholds somebody else's withholds and gives them as
answers is a card. But he isn't helped when the auditor lets him do it.
Situation: You ask the pc for a withhold about Joe. The pc who says, "I
heard that Joe . . . ," should be asked right there, "What have you done to
Joe? You. Just you." And it turns out he stole Joe's last blonde. But if
the auditor had let this pc go on and on about how the pc had heard how Joe
was this or that, the session would have gone on and on and the Tone Arm up
and up.
We have pcs who use "withholds" to spread all manner of lies. We ask
this pc, "Have you ever done anything to the Org?" The pc says, "Well, I'm
withholding that I heard . . . ," or the pc says, "Well, I thought some
bitter thoughts about the Org." Or the pc says, "I was critical of the Org
when . . . ," and we don't sail in and get WHAT THE PC DID, we can
comfortably stretch a 5-minute item to a session or two.
If the pc "heard" and the pc "thought" and the pc "said" in answer to
an Integrity Processing question, the pc's reactive bank is really saying,
"I've got a crashing big withhold and if I can keep on fooling around by
giving critical thoughts, rumours, and what others did, you'll never get
it." And if he gets away with it, the auditor has missed a withhold
question.
We only want to know what the pc did, when he did it, what was the
first time he did it and what he did just before that, and we'll nail it
every time.
___________
THE IRRESPONSIBLE PC
If you want to get withholds off an "irresponsible pc" you sometimes
can't ask what the pc did or withheld and get a meter reaction.
This problem has bugged us for some time; I finally got very bright and
realized that no matter whether the pc thought it was a crime or not, he or
she will answer up on "don't know" versions as follows:
Situation: "What have you done to your husband?" Pc's answer, "Nothing
bad." E-Meter reaction, nul. Now we know this pc, through our noticing she
is critical of her husband, has overts on him. But she can take no
responsibility for her own acts.
But she can take responsibility for his not knowing. She is making certain
of that.
So we ask, "What have you done that your husband doesn't know about?"
And it takes an hour for her to spill it all, the quantity is so great.
For the question releases the floodgates. The Meter bangs around.
And with these withholds off, her responsibility comes up and she can
take responsibility on the items.
This applies to any zone or area or terminal of Integrity Processing.
Situation: We are getting a lot of "I thought", "I heard", "They said",
"They did" in answer to a question. We take the terminal or terminals
involved and put them in this blank:
"What have you done that________(doesn't) (don't) know about?"
And we can get the major overts that lay under the blanket of "How bad
everyone is but me."
____________
This prevents you missing an Integrity Processing question. It's a bad
crime to do so. This will shorten the labour involved in getting every
question flat.
And if your pc is withholdy you can insert this "Have I missed an
Integrity Processing question on you?" while doing the processing.
Always clear up what was missed.
A pc can be very upset by reason of a missed Integrity Processing
question. Keep them going up, not down.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1972R
REVISED 1 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Integrity Processing Series 12R
WITHHOLDS, MISSED
AND PARTIAL
I don't know exactly how to get this across to you except to ask you to
be brave, squint up your eyes and plunge.
I don't appeal to reason. Only to faith at the moment. When you have a
reality on this, nothing will shake it and you'll no longer fail cases or
fail in life. But, at the moment, it may not seem reasonable. So just try
it, do it well and day will dawn at last.
What are these natterings, upsets, ARC Breaks, critical tirades, lost
students, ineffective motions? They are restimulated but missed or
partially missed withholds. If I could just teach you that and get you to
get a good reality on that in your own auditing, your activities would
become smooth beyond belief.
It is true that ARC Breaks, present time problems and withholds all
keep a session from occurring. And we must watch them and clear them.
But behind all these is another button, applicable to each, which
resolves each one. And that button is the restimulated but missed or
partially missed withhold.
____________
Life itself has imposed this button on us.
If you know about people or are supposed to know about people, then
these people expect, unreasonably, that you know them through and through.
Real knowledge to the average person is only this: a knowledge of his
or her withholds! That, horribly enough, is the high tide of knowledge for
the man in the street. If you know his withholds, if you know his crimes
and acts, then you are smart. If you know his future you are moderately
wise. And so we are persuaded toward mind reading and fortune telling.
All wisdom has this trap for those who would be wise.
Egocentric man believes all wisdom is wound up in knowing his
misdemeanors.
IF any wise man represents himself as wise and fails to discover what a
person has done, that person goes into an antagonism or other misemotion
toward the wise man. So they hang those who restimulate and yet who do not
find out about their withholds.
This is an incredible piece of craziness. But it is observably true.
This is the WILD ANIMAL REACTION that makes Man a cousin to the beasts.
A good auditor can understand this. A bad one will stay afraid of it and
won't use
____________
"Have I missed a withhold on you?" can be used in Integrity Processing
if the preclear gets upset or critical during session.
____________
Any ARC Broken pc should be asked, "What withhold have I missed on
you?" Or, "What have I failed to find out about you?" Or, "What should I
have known about you?"
____________
An Integrity Processing Specialist who cannot read a meter is dangerous
because he or she will miss withholds and the pc may become very upset.
____________
Use this as a stable datum: If the person is upset, somebody failed to
find out what that person was sure they would find out.
____________
A missed withhold is a should have known.
____________
The only reason anyone has ever left Scientology is because people
failed to find out about them.
____________
This is valuable data. Get a reality on it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright �1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 DECEMBER 1972
REISSUED 7 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
CANCELS
BTB OF 16 DECEMBER 1972
SAME TITLE
Integrity Processing Series 13
HELP THE PC
In general, when getting rudiments in or getting off missed withholds
or invalidations, help the pc by guiding his attention against the needle.
This is quite simple. The auditor asks the question, the needle
instantly reacts, the pc (as he or she usually does) looks puzzled if the
auditor says "It reacts." The pc thinks it over. As he or she is thinking,
the auditor will see the same reaction on the needle. Softly the auditor
says "That" or "There" or "What's that you're looking at?" As the pc knows
what he or she is looking at that instant, the thing can be dug up.
This is auditor co-operation, not triumph.
Most often the pc does not know what it is that reacts as only unknowns
react. Therefore an auditor's "There" when the needle twitches again,
before the pc has answered, co-ordinates with whatever the pc is looking at
and thus it can be spotted and revealed by the pc. This is only done when
the pc comm lags for a few seconds.
Remember, the pc is always willing to reveal. He or she doesn't know
What to reveal. Therein lies the difficulty. Pcs get driven out of session
when asked to reveal something yet do not know what to reveal.
By the auditor's saying "There" or "What's that?" quietly each time the
needle reacts newly, the pc is led to discover what should be revealed.
Auditors and pcs get into a games condition in Integrity Processing and
rudiments only when the auditor refuses this help to the pc.
New auditors routinely believe that in Integrity Processing the pc
knows the answer and won't give it. This is an error. If the pc knew all
the answer, it wouldn't react on the meter.
Old-timers have found out that only if they steer by repeated meter
reaction, giving the pc "There" or "What's that?" can the pc answer up on
most rudiments questions, missed withholds and so on.
But don't use steering to harass the pc, or cut his comm, or draw
attention to the auditor.
This is the only use of reads other than instant reads on the E-Meter.
Help the pc. He doesn't know. Otherwise the needle would never react.
LRH: nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright �1972, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 DECEMBER 1972
REISSUED 7 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
CANCELS
BTB OF 17 DECEMBER 1972
SAME TITLE
Integrity Processing Series 14
HAVINGNESS
All valences are circuits are valences.
Circuits key out with knowingness.
This is the final definition of havingness.
Havingness is the concept of being able to reach. No-havingness is the
concept of not being able to reach.
A withhold makes one feel he or she cannot reach. Therefore withholds
are what cut havingness down and made runs on havingness attain unstable
gains. In the presence of withholds havingness sags.
As soon as a withhold is pulled, ability to reach is potentially
restored but the pc often does not discover this. It requires that
havingness be run to get the benefit of having pulled most withholds.
Therefore havingness may be run in conjunction with Integrity
Processing but may NOT be used to hide or obscure the fact of failure to
F/N an Integrity Form question.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright �1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JANUARY 1973
(Reissued 6 April 74-Only
change made is in signature)
Remimeo
Study Series 9
CONFRONT
There are several choices in English on the meaning of "confront".
These include the right one: To face without flinching or avoiding. An
example in a sentence: "The test of a free society is its capacity to
confront rather than evade the vital questions of Choice."
There is another meaning "To stand facing or opposing, especially in
challenge, defiance or accusation."
English is a pretty limited language in many ways. I imagine the
thought of facing something (which is what the word came from and
originally meant way back "front" being "face") was so horrifying to the
types who write dictionaries they knew it would be bad!
In essence it is an action of being able to face.
If one cannot, if he avoids, then he is not AWARE.
Awareness is the ability to perceive the existence of. In the
dictionary it also fails to confront that and says "Awareness: the quality
or state of being aware." And Aware means: "marked by realization,
perception or knowledge."
So these chaps couldn't confront and so conceived awareness to be
figure-figure.
We are moving out of the range of language when we want to say:
"He could stand up to things and wasn't always shrinking back into
himself and avoiding, so he could be fully conscious of the real universe
and others around him."
And that's what Confront means.
If one can confront he can be aware.
If he is aware he can perceive and act.
If he can't confront he will not be aware of things and will be
withdrawn and not perceiving. Thus he is unaware of things around him.
That's the tech of it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ntmjh
Copyright � 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MARCH 1973
Remimeo Issue I
REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974
(Only change is signature)
STEP FOUR-HANDLING ORIGINATIONS
Edited and taken from
PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN NO. 151
1 January 1959
What do we mean by an origin of the preclear? He volunteers something
all on his own; and do you know that is a very good index of case-whether
the person volunteers anything on his own? An old-time auditor used this as
a case index. He said, "This fellow isn't getting any better. He hasn't
offered up anything yet." You see, he didn't originate-he didn't originate
a communication.
So remember that the preclear is as well as he can originate a
communication. That means he can stand at Cause on the communication
formula. And that is a desirable point for him to reach.
But how about in the walk-away world-the world that is ambulant and
moving around and spinning quietly, or noisily, as the case may be? Do you
ever have to handle an origin in it? Well, I dare say that every argument
you have ever got into was because you did not handle an origin. Every time
you have ever got into trouble with anybody, you can trace it back along
the line you didn't handle. If a person walks in and says, "Whee! I've just
passed with the highest mark in the whole school," and you say, "I'm
awfully hungry, shouldn't we go out and eat?"-you'll find yourself in a
fight. He feels ignored. He originated a communication to have you prove to
him that he was there and he was solid. Most little kiddies get frantic
about their parents when their parents don't handle their originations
properly. Handling an origination merely tells the person, "All right, I
heard it, you're there." You might say it is a form of acknowledgment, but
it's not; it is the communication formula in reverse. But the auditor is
still in control if he handles the origin-otherwise, the communication
formula goes out of his control and he is at effect point, no longer at
cause point. An auditor continues at cause point.
So let's look this over. The handling of an origin has a great deal of
use and, until recently, it was the least pat step in Scientology. How did
you handle an origin? And we finally found out. I finally had a cognition
myself. I tried for a long time to communicate this to people and they
still blundered on it occasionally. And I finally found out something that
did seem to communicate.
There are three steps in handling an origin. Here is the setup: The
preclear is sitting in the chair and the auditor is sitting across from the
preclear, and the auditor is saying, "Do fish swim?" or "Do birds fly?" and
the preclear says, "Yes." Here is the factor, now, entering: "Do fish
swim?" The preclear doesn't answer Do fish swim, the preclear says, "You
know-your dress is on fire,'' or "I'm eight feet back of my head," or "Is
it true that all cats weigh 1.8 kilograms?" You see, wog-wog-where did this
come from? Well, although it is usually circuitry or something like that at
work when it's that far off beam, it is, nevertheless, an origin. How do
you handle it? Well, you don't want the preclear to go out of session, and
he would if you handled it wrongly, so (I) you answer it; (2) you maintain
ARC (you don't spend any time at it, but you just maintain ARC); and (3)
you get the preclear back on the process. One, two, three. And if you spend
too much time in (2), you'll be doing wrong.
What is an origin? All right, he says, "I'm eight feet back of my head."
It's an origin; what are you supposed to do with it? Well, you're supposed
to answer it. In this particular case, you would say to him something in
the order of, "You are?" (You mean something like, "I've heard the
communication-it's made an effect on me.") Now, in maintaining ARC you can
skimp that second one if you handle the third one expertly enough. The
least important one is the second one, but the most deadly thing you can do
is utterly to neglect the second one of maintaining ARC. That's deadly. But
you can skip it if you really punch it into the third one, which is to say,
get him back into session. So he says, "I'm eight feet back of my head,"
and you say, "YOU ARE???" (What he said really hit, you know.) He's kind of
wog-wog about this-he's not sure what this is all about. You say, "You
are?" and the fellow says, "Yes."
"Well!" you say. "What did I say that made that happen?"
"Oh, you said 'Do birds fly?' and I thought of myself as a bird and I
guess that's the way it is, but I am eight feet back of my head."
"Well, that's pretty routine," you say-reassure him, maintain the ARC.
"Now, what was that auditing question?"
"Oh, you asked me 'Do birds fly?' "
And you say, "That's right. Do birds fly?"
Back in session, you see.
You can't do this: You can't put it into a can and put a label on it
and say "This is how you do it always," because it's always something
peculiar; but you can say these three steps are followed.
I will give you another example. You say, "Do birds fly?" and he says,
"I have a blinding headache."
"You do?" you say. "Is it bothering you (that's the ARC) too much to
carry on with the session (and you've reached number three at once)?"
"Oh no-it's pretty bad though."
"Well, let's go on with this, shall we?" you say. "Maybe it'll do
something with it (maintaining ARC)."
He says, "Well, all right," and you're right back onto it again: "Do
birds fly?"
One of the trickiest of these is "What in my question reminded you of
that?" The fellow says, "Well, so and so," and he explains it to you and
you say, "Well, good. Do birds fly?" and you're right back in session
again.
Three parts, and-that is the important thing-you have to learn how to
handle these things.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1959,1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1973
REISSUED 19 SEPTEMBER 1974
(Only change is signature)
Remimeo
HAS Course
AXIOM 28 AMENDED
AXIOM 28.
COMMUNICATION IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ACTION OF IMPELLING AN IMPULSE
OR PARTICLE FROM SOURCE-POINT ACROSS A DISTANCE TO RECEIPT-POINT, WITH
THE INTENTION OF BRINGING INTO BEING AT THE RECEIPT-POINT A DUPLICATION
AND UNDERSTANDING OF THAT WHICH EMANATED FROM THE SOURCE-POINT.
The formula of Communication is: Cause, Distance, Effect, with
Intention, Attention and Duplication WITH UNDERSTANDING.
The component parts of Communication are Consideration, Intention,
Attention, Cause, Source-point, Distance, Effect, Receipt-point,
Duplication, Understanding, the Velocity of the impulse or particle,
Nothingness or Somethingness. A non-communication consists of Barriers.
Barriers consist of Space, Interpositions (such as walls and screens of
fast-moving particles), and Time. A communication by definition, does
not need to be two-way.
When a communication is returned, the formula is repeated, with the
receipt-point now becoming a source-point and the former source-point
now becoming a receipt-point.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .rd
Copyright � 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 APRIL 1973R
Remimeo REVISED 15 NOVEMBER 1974
All (Revisions are in this type style)
Supervisors
All Students CANCELS
TR Courses BTB OF 7 APRIL 1973
GRADIENTS IN TRs
(Taken from LRH Tape of 30 June 1961,
"Training on TRs-Talk on Auditing")
Time after time you're going to find somebody in an Organization trying
to teach the TRs this way: Go on to TR 0 and stick there.
Eight months later he'll still be doing the TR 0.
You're going to find that consistently, because the element of ENDURE
enters into it. That is improper.
Here is the way you do the TRs. You'll find it very valuable.
You do TR 0, flunking only TR 0. You go on to TR 1. The guy didn't pass
TR 0. He just got accustomed to it a little bit.
You do TR 1, flunking only TR 1. Don't flunk anything else.
TR 2, flunking only TR 2.
TR 3, flunking only TR 3.
TR 4, flunking only TR 4.
Now come back to TR 0. Get the guy better at TR 0.
Then go through it again, flunking only the TR he is on. It's kind of
like running the CCHs-they get a little bit of a win at it and you go on to
the next one.
About the third run through or maybe the fifth run through, according
to your judgement, you start TR O and you insist that it's pretty good; and
you should really start cuffing him around. Flunk only the one he's on but
start cuffing him around hard. Give him the business. Give him things he
can't possibly confront. Try to shake him up.
Now-start in TR 0 and give him the works. TR 1 and give him the works.
TR 2-3-4. Flunk only the TR that he's on, but give him the works. Don't
give him a chance.
Run through the TRs that way a couple of times, flunking only the TR
that he's on, giving him the works, pushing his buttons. Give him something
to confront for sure.
And then start the business of TR 0, mess him up, TR 1, mess him up-and
flunk TR 1 AND TR 0.
TR 2, mess him up, flunk TR 2, TR 1, TR 0.
Get him on TR 3, messing him up and flunking TR 3, TR 2, TR 1, TR 0.
Get him on TR 4, messing him up and flunking TR 4, TR 3, TR 2, TR 1, TR
0.
Thereafter in running the TRs always give him the works. Flunk
everything in that battery of TRs.
If you do that, you shorten considerably the time it takes to learn the
TRs.
In other words, you approach this with a gradient scale.
We did learn about gradient scales many years ago and we should
continue to apply that knowledge.
Let them get used to each TR.
You'll find out they progress much faster if you do it that way.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1961,1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1973RA
Remimeo Issue I
Qual Secs REVISED 20 FEBRUARY 1974
Cramming REISSUED 19 SEPTEMBER 1974
Offs (Only change is signature)
Cramming Series 10RA
CRAMMING
The datum that "Qual does not take orders" solves the Admin Cramming
dilemma of the staff member crammed four times on the Dev-T Pack.
It is up to Qual to handle, fully and totally. This means, not
following the exact order, but finding the real Why on the person and
handling it at once.
Qual's function is correction. By policy Qual does not take orders on
What to do to correct.
Where an exec wants certain material covered, that's okay. Cover it.
But find the WHY! And on a repeat order, realize it was a wrong Why and
really work it over.
Several staff have been crammed several times on the Dev-T Pack. Means
Qual takes orders.
The PRODUCT of Qual Admin Cramming is a functioning producing staff
member who can produce on post.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JULY 1973
Remimeo
ASSIST SUMMARY
REFERENCE:
HCO PL 7 Aug 71 Interne Okay to Audit Checksheet,
Issue II Assists Pack
HCO B 5 July 71 C/S Series 49, Assists
HCO B 23 July 71 Assists, A Flag Expertise Subject
HCO B 12 Mar 69 Physically Ill Pcs and Pre OTs
Issue II
HCO B 24 Apr 69 Dianetic Use
HCO B 14 May 69 Sickness
HCO B 23 May 69 Auditing out Sessions,
Narrative Versus Somatic Chains
HCO B 24 July 69 Seriously Ill Pcs
HCO B 27 July 69 Antibiotics
HCO B 15 Jan 70 The Uses of Auditing
HCO B 1 Dec 70 Dianetics-Triple Flow Action
HCO B 5 Jan 71 Going Earlier in R3-R
and Exteriorization Intensives
HCO B 9 Oct 67 Assists for Injuries
HCO B 22 July 70 Touch Assist
HCO B S May 69 Touch Assists
HCO B 2 Jan 71 Illegal Auditing
HCO B 15 July 70 Unresolved Pains
(Reissued 25 Nov 70)
HCO B 7 Apr 72 Touch Assists, Correct Ones
Injuries, operations, delivery of babies, severe illnesses and periods
of intense emotional shock all deserve to be handled with thorough and
complete assists.
Medical examination and diagnosis should be sought where needed, and
where treatment is routinely successful, medical treatment should be
obtained. As an assist can at times cover up an actual injury or broken
bone, no chances should be taken, especially if the condition does not
easily respond. In other words where something is merely thought to be a
slight sprain, to be on the safe side an X-ray should be obtained,
particularly if it does not at once respond. An assist is not a substitute
for medical treatment but is complementary to it. It is even doubtful if
full healing can be accomplished by medical treatment alone and it is
certain that an assist greatly speeds recovery. In short, one should
realize that physical healing does not take into account the being and the
repercussion on the spiritual beingness of the person.
Injury and illness are PREDISPOSED by the spiritual state of the
person. They are PRECIPITATED by the being himself as a manifestation of
his current spiritual condition. And they are PROLONGED by any failure to
fully handle the spiritual factors associated with them.
The causes of PREDISPOSITION, PRECIPITATION and PROLONGATION are
basically the following:
1. Postulates.
2. Engrams.
3. Secondaries.
4. ARC Breaks with the environment, situations, others or the body
part.
5. Problems.
6. Overt Acts.
7. Withholds.
8. Out of communicationness.
The purely physical facts of injuries, illnesses and stresses are
themselves incapacitating and do themselves often require physical analysis
and treatment by a doctor or nutritionist. These could be briefly
catalogued as:
A. Physical damage to structure.
B. Disease of a pathological nature.
C. Inadequacies of structure.
D. Excessive structure.
E. Nutritional errors.
F. Nutritional inadequacies.
G. Vitamin and bio-compound excesses.
H. Vitamin and bio-compound deficiencies.
I. Mineral excesses.
J. Mineral deficiencies.
K. Structural malfunction.
L. Erroneous examination.
M. Erroneous diagnosis.
N. Erroneous structural treatment.
O. Erroneous medication.
There is another group which belongs to both the spiritual and physical
divisions. These are:
i. Allergies.
ii. Addictions.
iii. Habits.
iv. Neglect.
v. Decay.
Any of these things in any of the three groups can be a cause of non-
optimum personal existence.
We are not discussing here the full handling of any of these groups or
what optimum state can be attained or maintained. But it should be obvious
that there is a level below which life is not very tolerable. How well a
person can be or how efficient or how active is another subject entirely.
Certainly life is not very tolerable to a person who has been injured
or ill, to a woman who has just delivered a baby, to a person who has just
suffered a heavy emotional shock. And there is no reason a person should
remain in such a low state, particularly for weeks, months or years when he
or she, could be remarkably ASSISTED to recover in hours, days or weeks.
It is in fact a sort of practised cruelty to insist by neglect that a
person continue on in such a state when one can learn and practise and
obtain relief for such a person.
We are mainly concerned with the first group, 1-8. The group is not
listed in the order that it is done but in the order that it has influence
upon the being.
The idea has grown that one handles injuries with touch assists only.
This is true for someone who as an auditor has only a smattering of
Scientology. It is true for someone in such pain or state of case (which
would have to be pretty bad) that he cannot respond to actual auditing.
But a Scientologist really has no business "having only a smattering"
of auditing skills that could save his or the lives of others. And the case
is very rare who cannot experience proper auditing.
The actual cause of not handling such conditions is, then, to be found
as iv. NEGLECT. And where there is Neglect, v. DECAY is very likely to
follow.
One does not have to be a medical doctor to take someone to a medical
doctor. And one does not have to be a medical doctor to observe that
medical treatment may not be helping the patient. And one does not have to
be a medical doctor to handle things caused spiritually by the being
himself.
Just as there are two sides to healing-the spiritual and the structural or
physical, there are also two states that can be spiritually attained. The
first of these states might be classified as "humanly tolerable". Assists
come under this heading. The second is spiritually improved. Grade auditing
comes under this second heading.
Any minister (and this has been true as long as there has been a
subject called religion) is bound to relieve his fellow being of anguish.
There are many ways a minister can do this.
An assist is not engaging in healing. It is certainly not engaging in
treatment. What it is doing is ASSISTING THE INDIVIDUAL TO HEAL HIMSELF OR
BE HEALED BY ANOTHER AGENCY BY REMOVING HIS REASONS FOR PRECIPITATING, AND
PROLONGING HIS CONDITION AND LESSENING HIS PREDISPOSITION TO FURTHER INJURE
HIMSELF OR REMAIN IN AN INTOLERABLE CONDITION.
This is entirely outside the field of "healing" as envisioned by the
medical doctor and by actual records of results is very, very far beyond
the capability of psychology, psychiatry and "mental treatment" as
practised by them.
In short, the assist is strictly and entirely in the field of the
spirit and is the traditional province of religion.
A minister should realize the power which lies in his hands and his
potential skills when trained. He has this to give in the presence of
suffering: he can make life tolerable. He can also shorten a term of
recovery and may even make recovery possible when it might not be
otherwise.
When a minister confronts someone who has been injured or ill, operated
upon or who has suffered a grave emotional shock, he should be equipped to
do and should do the following:
A CONTACT ASSIST where possible and where indicated until the person
has reestablished his communication with the physical universe site. To FN.
A TOUCH ASSIST until the person has reestablished communication with
the physical part or parts affected. To FN.
HANDLE ANY ARC BREAK that might have existed at the time a) with the
environment, b) with another, c) with others, d) with himself, e) with the
body part or the body, and f) with any failure to recover at once. Each to
FN.
HANDLE ANY PROBLEM the person may have had a) at the time of illness or
injury, b) subsequently due to his or her condition. Each to FN.
HANDLE ANY OVERT ACT the person may feel he or she committed a) to
self, b) to the body, c) to another, and d) to others. Each to FN.
HANDLE ANY WITHHOLD a) the person might have had at the time, b) any
subsequent withhold, and c) any having to withhold the body from work or
others or the environment due to being physically unable to approach it.
HANDLE ANY SECONDARY, which is to say emotional reactions, before,
during or after the situation. This must be run from the first intimation
something was wrong or going to happen or being told something had
happened. This is by chain to FN. And then Flow 2 to FN and then Flow 3 to
FN.
HANDLE ANY ENGRAM of actual physical duress. Run Flow 1 by chain to FN.
Then Flow 2 to FN. Then Flow 3 to FN. It is understood here that Flow One
was the physical incident itself, not necessarily something done to the
person but as something that happened to him or her.
POSTULATE TWO-WAY COMM. This is two-way comm on the subject of "any
decision to be hurt" or some such wording. This is done only if the person
has not
already discovered that he had decisions connected to the incident. It is
carried to FN. One must be careful not to invalidate the person.
Where a person is injured, given a contact or touch assist and then
medical examination and treatment, he is given the remainder as soon as he
is able to be audited. The drug "five days" does not need to apply. But
where the person has been given an assist over drugs, one must later come
back to the case when he is off drugs and run the drug part out or at least
make sure that nothing was submerged by the drugs. It is not uncommon for a
person to be oblivious of certain parts of a treatment or operation at the
time of initial auditing, only to have a missing piece of the incident pop
up days, months or even years later. THIS is the reason injuries or
operations occasionally seem to persist despite a full assist: a piece of
it was left unhandled due to a drugged condition during the operation; such
bits may come off unexpectedly in routine auditing on some other apparently
disrelated chain.
It can happen that a person is in the midst of some grade auditing at
the time of an injury or illness or receiving an emotional shock. The
question arises as to whether or not to disrupt the grade auditing to
handle the situation. It is a difficult question. But certainly the person
cannot go on with grade auditing while upset or ill. The usual. answer is
to give a full assist and repair the case to bridge it back into the grade
auditing. The question however may be complicated in that some error in the
grade auditing is also sitting there, not to cause the illness or accident
but to complicate the assist. This question is handled fully only by study
of the case by a competent Case Supervisor. The point is not to let the
person go on suffering while time is consumed making a decision.
SUMMARY
Religion exists in no small part to handle the upsets and anguish of
life. These include spiritual duress by reason of physical conditions.
Ministers long before the Apostles had as a part of their duties the
ministering to the spiritual anguish of their people. They have
concentrated upon spiritual uplift and betterment. But where physical
suffering impeded this course, they have acted. To devote themselves only
to the alleviation of physical duress is of course to attest that the
physical body is more important than the spiritual beingness of the person
which, of course, it is not. But physical anguish can so distract a being
that he deserts any aspirations of betterment and begins to seek some
cessation of his suffering. The specialty of the medical doctor is the
curing of physical disease or non-optimum physical conditions. In some
instances he can do so. It is no invasion of his province to assist the
patient to greater healing potential. And ills that are solely spiritual in
nature are not medical.
The "psych-iatrist" and "psych-ologist" on the other hand took their
very names from religion since "psyche" means soul. They, by actual
statistics, are not as successful as priests in relieving mental anguish.
But they modernly seek to do so by using drugs or hypnotism or physical
means. They damage more than they help.
The minister has a responsibility to his people and those about him to
relieve suffering. He has many ways to do this. He is quite successful in
doing so and he does not need or use drugs or hypnotism or shock or surgery
or violence. Until his people are at a level where they have no need of
physical things, he has as a duty preventing their spiritual or physical
decay by relieving where he can their suffering.
His primary method of doing so is the ASSIST.
As the knowledge of how to do them exists and as the skill is easily
acquired, he actually has no right to neglect those for whose well-being he
is responsible, as only then can he lead them to higher levels of spiritual
attainment.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1973 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Added to by HCO B 6 Jan 74, Assist Summary-
Addition.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JULY 1973
Tours Hats (HCO PL 25 June 1972 Reissued
ARC Brk Regs as an HCO B without change.)
Est Os
Qual Secs
Dirs Qual Flub Catch Series 4
Validity
ARC Brk
RECOVERING STUDENTS
AND PCS
ARC Brk Regs and Tours Personnel (as well as Ethics Officers) collide
with students and pcs who have blown (run away from) the org.
The recovery of these and getting them back on the line is of great
interest to such personnel.
In the first place, they muddy up a field. In the second place EVERY
ONE OF THEM CAN BE GOTTEN BACK IN.
If you leave them about they spoil prospects.
And there's nothing more startling to their friends than to have these
people who have been nattering around suddenly turn up (repaired) saying,
"OK it's all fine now. They're great guys."
Because Tech does work, this is not hard to do. Down deep they know
that we do have the answer. It's an apparent refusal to apply it to them
they're concerned about.
Poor offbeat Supervision, poorly trained auditors, lack of cramming in
an org get in your way. So you have a deep interest that tech, in both
Courses and Auditing, is straight.
STUDENTS
Students who doped in Class, nattered or got upset have been known to
blow (leave hurriedly).
But also, students who are interrupted too often when F/Ning may also
blow! On a "w/h of nothingness".
These points-"not helped by the Super" and "interfered with too much"-
must BOTH be checked on getting blown students back.
ARC Brk Registrars and Tours people run into these blown students. They
must know how to handle.
There are 5 main blow reasons:
1. Misunderstood words (or no materials).
2. No help or WC Method 4 from the Supers (or no Super).
3. Interference from the Supers that stopped them from getting on.
4. Personal out-Ethics resulting in a w/h.
5. Simply booted off for reasons best known to God or Registrars (like
suddenly saying "You must now buy Method 1" etc, thus violating the
"deliver what we promise" rule).
The interference and boot-off reasons are the ones you'd least suspect.
Both generate a lot of H, E & R (Human Emotion and Reaction).
The reasons most pcs blow are
1. Out lists
2. No auditing
3. Invalidation of case or gains
4. Told they'd attained it and hadn't.
Of these the out list (meaning overlist or wrong items) produces the
most fantastic HE&R. Needs repair with an "L4B".
No auditing includes being sent to Ethics or Cramming (on Solo) or just
stalled. Remedy is to deliver what's promised.
Invalidation of case or gains includes being made to go on past a win.
This acts as an invalidation. Some pcs who made it are hung up from then on
out because no one asked them to declare it. Remedy is to get it declared.
When told they had attained it and hadn't they feel cut off from all
further help. Remedy is to repair it by getting off the suppress and finish
up the job in the org.
TO HANDLE ANY OF THIS YOU MUST REALIZE THAT TECH DOES WORK IN BOTH
STUDY AND AUDITING.
The most gross errors have to exist before it doesn't work.
Auditors can be trained to audit and can audit. But some SP in an org
gets some out tech order in force like "Auditors mustn't do TR 0 in
Cramming as it stirs up their cases" (which is a complete lie and which was
just found as NY's reason for poor tech and down stats).
ACTION
When handling the blown student or pc you can assess the above points
on a meter. Or just know them by heart and rattle them off and you'll get
the real reason right now.
The object is to put the student or pc back on the rails.
The above points are all valid.
A very fast way to handling auditing outnesses is to give a FREE
AUDITING CHECK using HCO B 31 Dec 71, Revised 16 May 72, C/S Series 53RC.
To it one adds "No Auditing" at the end under L. One has a good auditor
(who has good TRs and who knows how to read a meter well) assess it on the
blown or upset pc.
One or more of these items will give a Long Fall Blowdown. You indicate
this to the pc. You don't handle it. You just say, "The reason you were
upset was (whatever read)." The pc should suddenly magically feel better.
DON'T try to Audit it further on a FREE CHECK. Tell the pc to go to the org
to get everything handled now.
Route the assessed sheet "To the PC FOLDER OF (pc's name). PUT IN
FOLDER FOR FIRST AUDITING ACTION," and sign it.
The above checklists can be done on students by discussion. Don't use
the C/S 53RC and the pc checklist both as the pc checklist above is on the
C/S 53RC.
The difference is C/S 53RC has to be done by an auditor. The other list
can be done in 2 way comm socially.
In phoning people and running into ARC Broken pcs or students the two
short checklists can be used.
Sea Org Missions have successfully used another approach. They say
they're there to handle the org and make it a safe place. The response is
very gratifying.
THE PUBLIC HATES LIKE HELL TO BE DENIED DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY .
After all you're just handing them their future happiness on a silver
platter.
Don't just avoid such people. And don't bother to listen to the natter.
The above actions are the reasons.
Puts you right on top of the situation.
That's where Tours and ARC Brk Regs and auditors should be.
I recall one old fellow who blew an org staff (SH), hated everybody.
Stayed away for years. A student auditor ran into him socially, grabbed a
meter and put in Level III (Change and ARC Break) on him. And bang there he
was writing to me about how great it all was!
Bad Supervision or untrained or careless auditors or flubbing Admin
personnel make a lot of trouble for us. But the vast majority of org staffs
are very fine. So don't get down on the org. Get the flubbers unpopular.
And get back those who have been flubbed. There are no dog pcs or bad
students.
ETHICS ACTION
Whenever you find one of these you should make a brief report. One copy
goes to the Ethics Officer of the org, as a knowledge report. The other
goes to FLUB CATCH CONTROL TRAINING AND SERVICES FLAG.
You have to give the when and the who and the what.
Then the org itself and Flag can come down on the outness and correct
it.
SUMMARY
Just knowing these points there are no blown students or pcs you can't
get back or get signed up again.
LRH:nt jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972, 1973 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY 1973
Remimeo
Art Series 2
ART, MORE ABOUT
Ref: HCO B 30 Aug AD15, ART
How good does a professional work of art have to be? This would include
painting, music, photography, poetry, any of the arts whether fine or
otherwise. It would also include presenting oneself as an art form as well
as one's products.
Yes, how GOOD does such a work of art have to be?
Ah, you say, but that is an imponderable, a thing that can't be
answered. Verily, you say, you have just asked a question for which there
are no answers except the sneers and applause of critics. Indeed, this is
why we have art critics! For who can tell how good good is. Who knows?
I have a surprise for you. There IS an answer.
As you know, I searched for many years, as a sort of minor counterpoint
to what I was hardwork doing, to dredge up some of the materials which
might constitute the basis of art. Art was the most uncodified and most
opinionated subject on the planet after men's ideas about women and women's
ideas about men and Man's ideas of Man. Art was anyone's guess.
Masterpieces have gone unapplauded, positive freaks have gained raves.
So how good does a work of art have to be to be good?
The painter will point out all the tiny technical details known only to
painters, the musician will put a score through the Alto horn and explain
about valve clicks and lip, the poet will talk about meter types, the actor
will explain how the position and wave of one hand per the instructions of
one school can transform a clod into an actor. And so it goes, art by art,
bit by bit.
But all these people will be discussing the special intricacies and
holy mysteries of technique, the tiny things only the initiate of that art
would recognize. They are talking about technique. They are not really
answering how good a work of art has to be.
Works of art are viewed by people. They are heard by people. They are
felt by people. They are not just the fodder of a close-knit group of
initiates. They are the soul food of all people.
One is at liberty of course to challenge that wide purpose of art. Some
professors who don't want rivals tell their students "Art is for self-
satisfaction" "It is a hobby." In other words, don't display or exhibit,
kid, or you'll be competition! The world today is full of that figure-
figure. But as none of this self-satisfaction art meets a definition of art
wider than self for the sake of self, the professional is not interested in
it.
In any artistic production, what does one have as an audience? People.
Not, heaven forbid, critics. But people. Not experts in that line of art.
But people.
That old Chinese poet who, after he wrote a poem, went down out of his
traditional garret and read it to the flower-selling old lady on the corner
had the right idea. If she understood it and thought it was great, he
published. If she didn't he put it in the bamboo trash can. Not remarkably,
his poems have come down the centuries awesomely praised.
Well, one could answer this now by just saying that art should communicate
to people high and low. But that really doesn't get the sweating
professional anywhere as a guide in actually putting together a piece of
work and it doesn't give him a yardstick whereby he can say "That is that!"
"I've done it." And go out with confidence that he has.
What is technique? What is its value? Where does it fit? What is
perfectionism? Where does one stop scraping off the paint and erasing notes
and say "That is that"?
For there is a point. Some artists don't ever find it. The
Impressionists practically spun in as a group trying to develop a new way
of viewing and communicating it. They made it-or some of them did like
Monet. But many of them never knew where to stop and they didn't make it.
They couldn't answer the question "How good does a piece of art work have
to be to be good?"
In this time of century, there are many communication lines for works
of art. Because a few works of art can be shown so easily to so many there
may even be fewer artists. The competition is very keen and even dagger
sharp. To be good one has to be very good. But in what way and how?
Well, when I used to buy breakfasts for Greenwich Village artists
(which they ate hungrily, only stopping between bites to deplore my
commercialism and bastardizing my talents for the gold that bought their
breakfasts) I used to ask this question and needless to say I received an
appalling variety of responses. They avalanched me with technique or lack
of it, they vaguely dwelt on inherent talent, they rushed me around to
galleries to show me Picasso or to a board fence covered with abstracts.
But none of them told me how good a song had to be to be a song.
So I wondered about this. And a clue came when the late Hubert Mathieu,
a dear friend, stamped with youth on the Left Bank of the Seine and
painting dowagers at the Beaux Arts in middle age, said to me "To do any of
these modern, abstract, cubist things, you have to first be able to paint!"
And he enlarged the theme while I plied him in the midnight hush of
Manhattan with iced sherry and he finished up the First Lady of Nantucket's
somewhat swollen ball gown. Matty could PAINT. Finally he dashed me off an
abstract to show me how somebody who couldn't paint would do it and how it
could be done.
I got his point. To really make one of these too modern things come
off, you first had to be able to paint. So I said well, hell, there's
Gertrude Stein and Thomas Mann and ink splatterers like those. Let's see if
it really is an art form. So I sharpened up my electric typewriter and
dashed off the last chapters of a novel in way far out acid prose and put
THE END at the bottom and shipped it off to an editor who promptly pushed
several large loaves down the telephone wire and had me to lunch and unlike
his normal blase self said, "I really got a big bang (this was decades ago,
other years, other slang) out of the way that story wound up! You really
put it over the plate." And it sent his circulation rating up. And this was
very odd because you see the first chapters were straight since they'd been
written before Matty got thirsty for sherry and called me to come over and
the last chapters were an impressionistic stream of consciousness that Mann
himself would have called "an advanced rather adventurous over-Finneganized
departure from the ultra school."
So just to see how far this sort of thing could go, for a short while I
shifted around amongst various prose periods just to see what was going on.
That they sold didn't prove too much because I never had any trouble with
that. But that they were understood at all was surprising to me for their
prose types (ranging from Shakespeare to Beowulf) were at wild variance
with anything currently being published.
So I showed them to Matty the next time he had a ball gown to do or
three chins to paint out and was thirsty. And he looked them over and he
said, "Well, you proved my point. There's no mystery to it. Basically
you're a trained writer! It shows through."
And now we are getting somewhere, not just with me and my adventures and
long dead yesterdays.
As time rolled on, this is what I began to see: The fellow technician
in an art hears and sees the small technical points. The artist himself is
engrossed in the exact application of certain exact actions which produce,
when done, his canvas, his score, his novel, his performance.
The successful artist does these small things so well that he also then
has attention and skill left to get out his message, he is not still
fiddling about with the cerulean blue and the semiquaver. He has these
zeroed in. He can repeat them and repeat them as technical actions. No
ulcers. Strictly routine.
And here we have three surrealist paintings. And they each have their
own message. And the public wanders by and they only look with awe on one.
And why is this one different than the other two? Is it a different
message? No. Is it more popular? That's too vague.
If you look at or listen to any work of art, there is only one thing
the casual audience responds to en masse, and if this has it then you too
will see it as a work of art. If it doesn't have it, you won't.
So what is it?
TECHNICAL EXPERTISE ITSELF ADEQUATE TO PRODUCE AN EMOTIONAL IMPACT.
And that is how good a work of art has to be to be good.
If you look this over from various sides, you will see that the general
spectator is generally unaware of technique. That is the zone of art's
creators.
Were you to watch a crowd watching a magician, you would find one
common denominator eliciting uniform response. If he is a good magician he
is a smooth showman. He isn't showing them how he does his tricks. He is
showing them a flawless flowing performance. This alone is providing the
carrier wave that takes the substance of his actions to his audience.
Though a far cry from fine art, perhaps, yet there is art in the way he
does things. If he is good, the audience is seeing first of all, before
anything else, the TECHNICAL EXPERTISE of his performance. They are also
watching him do things they know they can't do. And they are watching the
outcome of his presentations. He is a good magician if he gives a
technically flawless performance just in terms of scenes and motions which
provide the channel for what he is presenting.
Not to compare Bach with a magician (though you could), all great
pieces of art have this one factor in common. First of all, before one
looks at the faces on the canvas or hears the meaning of the song, there is
the TECHNICAL EXPERTISE there adequate to produce an emotional impact.
Before one adds message or meaning, there is this TECHNICAL EXPERTISE.
TECHNICAL EXPERTISE is composed of all the little and large bits of
technique known to the skilled painter, musician, actor, any artist. He
adds these things together in his basic presentation. He knows what he is
doing. And how to do it. And then to this he adds his message.
All old masters were in there nailing canvas on frames as apprentices
or grinding up the lapis lazuli or cleaning paintbrushes before they
arrived at the Metropolitan.
But how many paintbrushes do you have to clean? Enough to know that
clean paintbrushes make clean color. How many clarinet reeds do you have to
replace? Enough to know which types will hit high C.
Back of every artist there is technique. You see them groping, finding,
discarding, fooling about. What are they hunting for? A new blue? No, just
a constant of blue that is an adequate quality.
And you see somebody who can really paint still stumbling about looking
for technique-a total overrun.
Someplace one says, "That's the TECHNICAL EXPERTISE adequate to produce
an emotional impact." And that's it. Now he CAN. So he devotes himself to
messages.
If you get this tangled up or backwards, the art does not have a good
chance of being good. If one bats out messages without a TECHNICALLY EXPERT
carrier wave of art, the first standard of the many spectators seems to be
violated.
The nice trick is to be a technician and retain one's fire. Then one
can whip out the masterpieces like chain lightning. And all the great
artists seem to have managed that. And when they forked off onto a new
trail they mastered the technique and then erupted with great works.
It is a remarkable thing about expertise. Do you know that some artists
get by on "Technical expertise adequate to produce an emotional impact"
alone with no messages? They might not suspect that. But it is true.
So the "expertise adequate" is important enough to be itself art. It is
never great art. But it produces an emotional impact just from quality
alone.
And how masterly an expertise? Not very masterly. Merely adequate. How
adequate is adequate? Well, people have been known to criticize a story
because there were typographical errors in the typing. And stories by the
non-adept often go pages before anyone appears or anything happens. And
scores have been known to be considered dull simply because they were
inexpertly chorded or clashed. And a handsome actor has been known not to
have made it because he never knew what to do with his arms, for all his
fiery thunderings of the Bard's words.
Any art demands a certain expertise. When this is basically sound,
magic! Almost anyone will look at it and say Ah! For quality alone has an
emotional impact. That it is cubist or dissonant or blank verse has very
little bearing on it; the type of the art form is no limitation to audience
attention generally when it has, underlying it and expressed in it, the
expertise adequate to produce an emotional impact.
The message is what the audience thinks it sees or hears. The
significance of the play, the towering clouds of sound in the symphony, the
scatter-batter of the current pop group, are what the audience thinks it is
perceiving and what they will describe, usually, or which they think they
admire. If it comes to them with a basic expertise itself able to produce
an emotional impact they will think it is great. And it will be great.
The artist is thought of as enthroned in some special heaven where all
is clean and there is no sweat, eyes half closed in the thrall of
inspiration. Well maybe he is sometimes. But every one I've seen had ink in
his hair or a towel handy to mop his brow or a throat spray in his hand to
ease the voice strain of having said his lines twenty-two times to the wall
or the cat. I mean the great ones. The others were loafing and hoping and
talking about the producer or the unfair art gallery proprietor.
The great ones always worked to achieve the technical quality
necessary. When they had it they knew they had it. How did they know?
Because it was technically correct.
Living itself is an art form. One puts up a mock-up. It doesn't happen
by accident. One has to know how to wash his nylon shirts and girls have to
know what mascara runs and that too many candy bars spoil the silhouette,
quite in addition to the pancreas.
Some people are themselves a work of art because they have mastered the
small practical techniques of living that give them a quality adequate to
produce an emotional impact even before anyone knows their name or what
they do.
Even a beard and baggy pants require a certain art if they are to be
the expertise adequate to produce an emotional impact.
And some products produce a bad misemotional impact without fully being
viewed. And by this reverse logic, of which you can think of many examples
such as a dirty room, you can then see that there might be an opposite
expertise, all by itself, adequate to produce a strong but desirable
emotional impact.
That is how good a work of art has to be. Once one is capable of
executing that technical expertise for that art form he can pour on the
message. Unless the professional form is there first, the message will not
transmit.
A lot of artists are overstraining to obtain a quality far above that
necessary to produce an emotional impact. And many more are trying to
machine gun messages at the world without any expertise at all to form the
vital carrier wave.
So how good does a piece of art have to be?
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.jh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JULY 1973
BPI
SCIENTOLOGY, CURRENT STATE OF THE
SUBJECT AND MATERIALS
There is a possibility that some Scientologists have not realized the
extent of technical materials which exist in Dianetics and Scientology on
the subject of the spirit, mind and life.
For instance, there are about 25,000,000 words on tape in archives
which provide the consecutive path of discovery.
When placed chronologically with books, HCOBs, HCO PLs and other issues
this gives a nearly complete record of all discoveries and applications in
these subjects.
The total numbers of words or even the number of tapes and issues to
date have not been reliably calculated.
From time to time various efforts have been made to transcribe and
issue all the materials. The task should be done, especially before the
decay of magnetic tape, some of which was of poor quality, eradicates the
material. But proper and safe equipment and trustworthy technicians who
would not turn out an overt product have been lacking. A project of
assembly in the 1960s was balked by inadequate record pressing material
available in the society around us. A more strenuous and reliable effort
should be made to place these archives into a more durable form than
magnetic tape.
More or less complete sets of all materials exist in many places on the
planet to safeguard against destruction.
It is from this tremendous archives that study packs and other
materials are made up. These and their checksheets are very numerous and
available.
A chronological study of materials is necessary for the complete
training of a truly top grade expert in these lines. He can see how the
subject progressed and so is able to see which are the highest levels of
development. Not the least advantage in this is the defining of words and
terms, for each, when originally used, was defined, in most cases, with
considerable exactitude, and one is not left with any misunderstoods. It is
for this reason that the Saint Hill Briefing Course checksheet should
consist only of the chronological materials, studied in chronological
order, excepting only the Study Tapes (Primary Rundown) which should be
done first if not previously done properly.
An enormous amount of this material does exist in issuable form. While
not strictly technical, HCO PLs, almost all of them, now exist in books
grouped by subjects and 1 think will soon exist in chronological form also.
It is projected that this be done with HCOBs, but these of course should be
only in chronological and complete order and the points where books and
tapes were part of this track should be indicated. Transcriptions and
edited versions of tapes (which do not however rearrange meaning or alter
data) exist for a great many tapes and it is projected that these shall
also be the subject of a future issue. For instance, the "Philadelphia
Lectures" have recently been transcribed and could easily be edited into
volumes for issue and should be, due to their popularity.
The subject of Scientology is to some degree developed in reverse
order. The task was to undercut the current level of Man and this was the
general target. Therefore one finds the higher levels publicly spoken of
most frequently in the earlier books and tapes (between '51 and '55). In
seeking full application to others and attainment for them of their
potentials it was necessary to codify the materials and develop processes
for them.
Any difficulties people were having with going Clear were handled in the
mid '60s and OT levels as they exist in Advanced Orgs were completed by
'68. There are perhaps 15 levels above OT VII fully developed but existing
only in unissued note form, pending more people's full attainment of OT VI
& VII.
In the early '70s the bottom was found with the discoveries of exactly
what psychosis was and the development of processes to handle it. This was
outside the scope of organizations at the time and is not in general use;
but it did finalize the task of undercutting low enough to include all
spiritual and mental materials, then, within the subject of Scientology, in
a state of applicability.
Many people believe that Scientology materials contain mainly
processes. They think of Scientology as processing. This is a very narrow
view. It is understandable enough as processing is the way out for them.
But this neglects the more considerable materials which deal with basics
and fundamentals; processes are only one use of these.
Other people, having gotten their smallest toe damp as an HAS then
wander off to other fields looking for answers, whereas had they taken
Dianetics or Scientology Grade training, to say nothing of the Saint Hill
Briefing Course, they would have found more fundamentals than exist in all
other subjects combined, a fact which any advanced student of Scientology
can confirm.
Still others think that the "newest" is of course the most advanced and
are looking for new "processes" to be issued or new materials; whereas the
process to resolve their case was most likely issued in earlier years. An
amusing instance of this is one whole continental area where an exact set
of principles was isolated and exact processes released that handle that
exact national type; yet, waiting for something new because they did not
know the old, they were found earlier this year to be ignoring this rundown
even on new preclears and of course were having a hard time of it for those
ARE the basic processes for that continent, for those people DO have that
barrier.
For quite a while I have had the "hat of finder of lost tech". Whole
sections of knowledge drop out of view, whole arrays of processes (and
administrative principles) go out of use and preclears there and the
organization of the area sag; but recovery is swift the moment the "lost"
knowledge is pulled out of their own file cabinets and restored .
Further, people in organizations are quite often at high case levels.
They have already experienced the bridging knowledge which connects the
subject to the man in the street. It is not new to THEM. They sometimes err
in believing it is not new to the world. Thus gaps are permitted to exist.
The solution is to recover the "lost" tech.
But it is also true that many in organizations work very hard to keep
the knowledge bridge in. And do well in accomplishing it.
Within the same civilization, many other subjects than Scientology
exist. Many of these other subjects are in a very primitive state while
pretending a very advanced position. Psychiatry and Psychology are a pair
of these. Their pretenses, inhumanities and even cruelties muddy up the
field of the spirit and mind. Because they produce negative or even
damaging results and because they were "authority" before Scientology began
to guide the field toward saner and more civilized levels, Scientology's
task of handling the public is made far more difficult than if the public
had not been so harmed and made suspicious of the field of the mind. Yet
the most mind-wrenching problems Psychiatry and Psychology practitioners
think they have (they have not confronted the real ones) give way before
the lowest most pedestrian levels of Scientology. There is an amusing story
of a Scientologist who attended a social meeting of Psychiatrists and
Psychologists and listened to them for a while as they moaned about their
patients and their own cases and then, being compassionate, began to
explain to them in a sort of technical baby talk the nature and resolution
of these "vast" "unsolvable" "problems". As he took no offense at their
ignorant arrogance which first greeted him and as he did seem to have a
grasp of their troubles, they kept him up until four AM going over their
"problems" in detail and gave him more and more absorbed attention and
began to cognite. They were very tame and very respectful when he left,
certain they had heard the guru of all time: and this is amusing because he
was not a trained auditor in any sense of the word and had only read a few
Scientology books! Yet to them he was their dean as a professional by
comparative and sensible knowledge.
Many Scientologists have had similar experiences. In the field of
Scientology Admin tech a staff member who had not had an Org Exec Course
but had been hatted in HCO went home for a vacation. His father who, like
some fathers, was certain his son was stupid, permitted him, with
misgivings, to reorganize the administration of his medical clinic along
Scientology lines. The son trained the small staff for only a week, lines
began to whizz, patients began to get handled, records went straight,
income rose and the father became absolutely convinced that his son was the
brightest organizational genius in the country; yet in the org they had
considered he had a long way to go to be a good Ethics Officer! Gives you
some comparative idea of where the lowest rudimentary levels of Scientology
sit in relation to current technologies.
Above such small bits of fringe information the bulk of Scientology
knowledge towers into mountains. It is accessible, in the main, to those
who seek it. The only barriers are usually their own lack of command of
their own language and the misconceptions of study ground into them from
kindergarten on. Means of solving these are also available and are daily
applied to countless newcomers over the world.
The actual barrier in the society is a failure to practice truth.
Living lives of white lies, they find it difficult to grasp that truth
actually exists. This can hang on as a habit during the first studies of a
student and he can defeat himself utterly by continuing a dishonesty in his
study-skipping this, not doing that. For Scientology is the road to truth
and he who would follow it must take true steps.
Some, seeing out of their own ambitious eyes and as jealous of any
imagined rival as any ferocious boy friend, seek to assert that Scientology
is interested in healing. This is something like saying that a Cadillac
engineer is interested only in window polish. For when you begin to handle
the causative force in Man he often also gets well. The "proofs" of
supposing Scientology is a healing activity are abundant enough if one sees
the recovery lists in any org. But they were not processed to heal them,
only to free them. A recent example of this occurred when a preclear broke
her ankle and was given medical treatment. Naturally the org was anxious to
get on with her program of processing and the ankle injury was in the way.
After weeks in medical hands with the ankle getting worse, the engram of
the injury was run out, the ankle got well and the person was again being
routinely processed a few days later. The auditor could be said to have
been engaged in healing. All he was doing was getting a body difficulty out
of his road so he could get on with it.
Recently, having found bottom on the mind and spirit some years ago, I
have been looking into physical nutrition and biochemistry. These latter
levels lie below the spirit and mind and could be loosely considered to be
an undercut as they do impede spiritual gain.
Many people are mainly fixated on the body and living as they do in an
intensely materialistic society, they are caught between being a body in
the work-a-day world and achieving spiritual freedom. This is of course
paradoxical. The game of being a body is the only game they have in their
eyes. Thus if something is wrong with their body they manifest having heavy
problems and they are anxious at the thought of losing a body: in other
words they have a hidden standard of body health as their measure of
spiritual attainment which, though illogical, is where they are and what
they are doing.
Scientology has long pursued the firm policy of sending the sick to the
medical doctor. There is no place they can send the insane as to send them
to psychiatry would be to condemn them to horror, and so orgs do not
usually handle them at all as they are not equipt to do so even when
technically able.
But the sick have been another matter. The gentlemanly thing to do was
to give the doctor his due and trust that he would respect the courtesy.
Instead, anxious for a total monopoly of health which he is quite incapable
of delivering especially in the USA, he seeks to eradicate all fancied
rivals. Thus this policy will one day come to an end. It is quite legal to
heal by spiritual means and even part of the law of most states and
countries and, indeed, was the sole province of religion for thousands of
years before the medical doctor came along. But this is no reason why
Scientology would make any effort to replace the medical doctor since he
has considerable value in the mechanics of bones and structural matters.
The only place he falls down is in handling general illnesses, especially
of a chronic nature.
Medicine has been overtaken in healing by nutritionists and biochemists.
They still seek to exclude these skills from their knowledge and
experience. Indeed, when demanding $46,000,000 to research heart disease
from a not always bright Congress in the U.S., medicine was contradicted by
no less than the head of Health, Education and Welfare who stated that
their "research" as planned did not include biochemistry, a rather strange
omission since this is the most result-filled field. It goes without
mention that the demand also excluded nutritional research. Many individual
doctors are prone to attack any patients they find "on vitamins" or who
timidly mention Vitamin E. And one is struck with the fact that heart
disease is the largest income source, I believe, of the doctor.
Thus there is a blindness in medical circles to the most productive and
curative practices in the field of illness and thus, policy or not,
organizations will soon have to bend to public demand and route the bill to
doctors only when they have broken bones or need surgery to get the bullets
or steering wheels out, and all others to the nutritionist who DOES use all
the modern developments in food, vitamins, minerals and advanced
biochemistry and use them intelligently.
An estimation of this latter field was therefore in order and I have
for some time now been engaged in an evaluation of it and a study of it.
What I have found is that the field lacks coordination of its
knowledge, not just from nutritionist to nutritionist but in the works of
the same person. A tremendous amount of material has been brought forth in
the last three decades. It is in a state of near chaos.
Liquefied grass and other dietary fads have become confused into the
sober routine subject of nutrition. Food fadism and nutritional knowledge
are interlocked in the public mind to such a degree that some unscrupulous
fellow who knows better could advise people to eat only tree bark and they
accommodatingly would. For instance there are books and books and books out
currently, by M.D.s and others who should have done their homework,
inveighing against "cholesterol": This is a biochemical composition of
animal oils and fats. They say it gets into the arteries and causes strokes
and heart attacks. Well, that is all very well. But did you also know that
every glandular secretion in the body, the secretions which keep one young
and functioning are ALL made by the glands from cholesterol? If people do
not take in cholesterol bearing foods they, by simple logic, could be seen
to rapidly age and die. What's wanted is the knowledge of how to keep
cholesterol controlled not how to take everyone off cholesterol. One would
think the American Medical Association owned shares in undertaking parlors.
A coordination of actual knowledge in these fields of nutrition and
biochemistry is what is lacking. Apparently researchers are clever enough
to isolate materials but are not wise enough to coordinate them fact
against fact into an intelligible subject.
While examining this scene I have found that nutrition and biochemistry
ARE the leaders, however. The subjects are actually arts and in a rather
primitive state. But illnesses still puzzling medicine are in many cases
quite old hat to the nutritionist.
If one wanted further proof, medical organizations, especially in the
US, are fighting nutrition with their usual violence where their pocket
book is threatened- black propaganda, government seizure orders and all the
routine mechanisms medicine has employed in its history to "safeguard" its
interests are in full play against the health food store and the vitamin
counter. That is enough to prove the point that nutrition is the leader in
our contemporary times where physical health body treatment is concerned.
While the medical doctor and his psychiatry branch flood out the
useless and destructive "tranquilizers", the nutritionist hands out a
couple tablets of magnesium which actually cool a person off beautifully
and far more effectively without the physical damage carried by the
tranquilizer.
The medical doctor and his psychiatry branch gave the world its
greatest wave of drug addiction. Their friend the German-oriented
psychologist, with his man-is-animal teaching of the young and destruction
of orthodox religion, has given the world its greatest period of crime.
They are on their way out even though they are fighting a dirty and violent
rearguard action. So why bet on losers? They won't make it.
Nutrition's star is rising into a blazing sun in the field of physical
treatment of the body. It is also wise enough to know and repeatedly state
that spiritual and mental stress MUST be handled before too much result can
be obtained, which is perfectly true.
Thus I have going at this particular time a project of codification and
coordination of what is known in the fields of nutrition and biochemistry,
not to be wiser than they, but to get some order into this field so that
its potential can be more fully realized.
This work is almost incidental to Scientology research. I am completing
something I started in 1945, which was a survey of biochemistry potentials
in order to decide a direction of research: did the mind monitor structure
or structure, as medicine thought, monitor the mind? The former was in 1945
found to be the true case to an overwhelming degree.
But at the same time, when people are so body fixated that they have
problems of a physical nature too intense to admit of any other
consideration, bringing them true power and freedom becomes difficult
unless one pays some attention to where their attention is fixated.
Malnutrition, deficiencies in vitamins and minerals, chronic illnesses
and unhealing wounds are all needlessly distracting but they are
nevertheless distracting.
There apparently exist easy ways to handle these things. There is no
sense in processing someone for a hundred hours only to find his only
interest is curing his headache and to discover that he has a headache
because he is allergic to bread and eats bread nearly as his sole diet! Or
to find that the overweight fellow is just getting processed to get his
body thin and after scores of hours discover he is living on candy bars and
has been diabetic for years! Not when you can simply take the former off
bread and wheat and give the latter some trivalent chromium and protein and
put a guard on the candy store. Make no mistake-one CAN process over the
top of these things and even handle, for the spirit and mind dominate them.
But why? It's far easier to parallel the mind and get the distraction
handled so one can THEN get to why he got that way in the first place if he
is still interested, though well. One can do things the hard way or the
easy way.
So nutrition and biochemistry are vital subjects and, due to medical
influence, very badly neglected subjects even in the presence of positive
and even vital value.
My current review of these is in the nature of an assist to processing.
As such, of course, they have to embrace the factors of predisposition to,
precipitation and prolongation of physical illness.
It has already been established, prior to present records, while I was
working with the general field of life in 1945, and has been confirmed by
contemporary researchers in nutrition and biochemistry that Stress is the
basic cause in physical illness. Thus, such nutritional research cannot
supplant the handling of stress. Further, conditions can exist where
nutrition and biochemistry cannot work at all until stress is relieved by
processing. Therefore, in lower stages of handling there is a band where
thought and physical beingness tend to merge. In this lower zone, assist
type processing and nutritional or biochemical aids seem to be
simultaneously necessary. In such instances one must alternate them or co-
apply them.
There are also a few deficiencies which produce manifestations quite
similar in appearance to insanity.
Where the illness or injury is acute and severe immediate physical
attention is mandatory and can be assisted only by the lightest possible
address to the mental factors, perhaps as light as simply being comforting
or gentle. In a case such as a person in a long continued coma, where
nutrition is intravenous, processing is still possible by gently causing
the person's hand to make repeated contact on command with a pillow or the
bed. Thus it can be seen, processing can reach a long way down.
Above all this physical level material of course, the subject has been
for a long time wrapped up. Persons continuing to play the body game limit
themselves in various ways and by the nature of life and this civilization
have their ups and downs even when well processed. If they have attained a
relatively high state as a bodied person they can however be rehabilitated,
usually simply by running out their overt acts and withholds and restoring
their exterior perception: they are, however, despite their continued
physical beingness, quite capable of easily assuming their full potentials:
they usually prefer to go on with the game by imposing limitations, for
instance to continue using their eyes. One rarely sees them do the stunts
and tricks of the Indian fakir even where they can since they have risen
above exhibitionism or the need to overwhelm or prove things and they are
of course continuing to play the game of human being, since that is the
main game they have available around them.
There is undoubtedly a considerable amount of neating up that I could
do, including making all materials more readily available, seeing to the
compilation of a very extensive dictionary of terms, filling in incidental
gaps where material may not have been fully recorded. These are
difficulties of a minor nature compared to the research in making the
result attainable.
It has been difficult working in a confused and, yes, even primitive
society that is starved for workable knowledge in the humanities. The very
condition that made it vital to seek out and release the material also made
it difficult to do the job in the first place.
Scientology now has more than enough data and technology to handle even
the broad problems in the humanities. The main task now is getting it fully
used, and along this line there are hundreds of thousands working every day
around the world.
Scientology is the fastest growing Religion on the planet by actual
surveys and statements by sociologists. And this is the more remarkable as
in this period orthodox Religions have shrunk before the materialistic
onslaught of our times.
The materials of Scientology are the result of forty-three years of
search, coordination and application to millions. The organizations of
Scientology have been building and expanding for nineteen years (despite
the fears and hates and jealousies of this civilization) on five continents
and making it all the way, thanks to the magnificent people of Scientology.
We are very rich in materials, in results and in the potential future.
Through our hardest times we have endured. Into our brightest times we are
expanding.
These materials contain the full basics of the only game in the
universe where everyone wins, the game of triumphant life itself.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.jh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 AUGUST 1973
Remimeo
PEP
I've been doing some research lately. That's mostly what I have been
doing. And while this is not the main line of research I thought 1 might
mention it in passing.
Something like four centuries ago Man's diet began to undergo a radical
change. What he ate before that was European, Asian. Whole grain barley,
various proteins, various wheats and other foods were not necessarily
abundant but they made up a radically different diet than modern Man
consumes.
With the discovery of the New World, for the first time there was an
abundance of SUGAR. Up until then sugar came from a few scarce plants and
beehives and was far too expensive for any broad general consumption. But
the wealth of the West Indies was not really gold. It was the product of
the sugar cane: BROWN AND WHITE SUGAR.
Also the Americas gave the world many new plants such as maize (the
African's "mealy meal"), the potato and other carbohydrates and today a
startlingly large amount of the European and African diet consists of
plants first found in America. Almost all these foods are mainly
carbohydrate, which is to say, low on protein.
Thus Man's diet changed. And the changes were in the direction of
abundant Sugar and Carbohydrate and away from a high protein diet.
And with this change, it could be said, there went Man's pep.
Sugar is a deceptive thing. It appears to give one energy. But it does
so by by-passing the body's production of its own sugar. Alcohol is also
deceptive. It apparently by-passes the ability to make sugar which is why
it messes up the liver. In other words sugar in abundance by-passed the
basic energy producing mechanisms of the body.
Straight sugar makes the stomach and digestive processes alkaline. This
is the opposite to acid. Food needs acid to digest. Therefore, as just one
part of all this scene, when one doesn't eat protein and digest his food he
winds up in a state of malnutrition-a general breakdown of body functions
due to lack of adequate nourishment.
Sugar, that is supposed "to produce energy" does so only at the expense
of physical health for sugar does not build up a body, it only burns it up.
The result of a heavy intake of sugar and carbohydrates is to feel
tired all the time-no pep. A diet of candy bars and cokes may appear to put
energy there but eventually no body is left to burn it!
Well, today they start little babies out on sugar and carbohydrate as
an "all right diet". No protein. The result is these fat babies you see
ballooning in their perambulators. They are starting life with two-and-a-
half strikes on them. The rest of the third strike is added by cokes and
candy bars. And there goes the old ball game. You get a civilization that
is tired, no endurance.
The degeneration can be reversed if one knocks off the cokes and candy
bars and sugar in the coffee and tea and begins to concentrate on an intake
of a good percentage of protein. After a few weeks or months, one starts to
feel peppy. The old body has begun to build itself back.
If one is going to run a car, he has to feed it the right fuel and oil. If
one is going to run a body it has to be fed the right food and that has to
include protein.
We have seen aboard a lot of diet fads. That's what they were. "Eat
liquefied carrots and you will fly." "Chomp only Vitamin X and you will
soar." Well, bad diets like that give dieting a bad name like "crazy".
We've had food cranks around who only ate hazelnuts or Chinese herbs. Well,
that's a different subject entirely than what I'm talking about. I think
those diets shouldn't even be wished off on the birds.
All I'm talking about is eating your chow instead of living off candy
bars, cokes and milk and sugared coffee.
By eating your hamburger and vegetables and leaving alone the candy
bars and cokes, you will begin to build up a head of steam. It takes far
longer for actual food to build up into energy than it does sugar.
Most of the bodies around got started off on a sugar-carbohydrate baby
formula and got to believing that if something tasted sweet it was good.
Well, cocaine probably tastes great too, but it won't build up a body and
the pep it imparts is very false indeed as it does so by ripping the body
apart.
Man's diet changed over the last four centuries. And he's now got a lot
of welfare and sick populations. And he sure pushes the stuff which got him
into that condition- sugar and carbohydrates.
America got even for being discovered and raped. She gave the world
hordes of new carbohydrates and principally she gave the world abundant raw
sugar. An interesting revenge.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ts
Copyright � 1973 by
L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1973
Remimeo
HCO Secs
E/Os
MAAs
Tech Secs PTS HANDLING
Ds of P
PTS Pack (PTS = Potential Trouble Source)
There are two stable data which anyone has to have, understand and KNOW
ARE TRUE in order to obtain results in handling the person connected to
suppressives.
These data are:
1. That all illness in greater or lesser degree and all foul-ups
stem directly and only from a PTS condition.
2. That getting rid of the condition requires three basic actions:
A. Discover. B. Handle or disconnect.
Persons called upon to handle PTS people can do so very easily, far
more easily than they believe. Their basic stumbling block is thinking that
there are exceptions or that there is other tech or that the two above data
have modifiers or are not sweeping. The moment a person who is trying to
handle PTSs gets persuaded there are other conditions or reasons or tech,
he is at once lost and will lose the game and not obtain results. And this
is very too bad because it is not difficult and the results are there to be
obtained.
To turn someone who may be PTS over to an auditor just to have him
mechanically audited may not be enough. In the first place this person may
not have a clue what is meant by PTS and may be missing all manner of
technical data on life and may be so overwhelmed by a suppressive person or
group that he is quite incoherent. Thus just mechanically doing a process
may miss the whole show as it misses the person's understanding of why it
is being done.
A PTS person is rarely psychotic. But all psychotics are PTS if only to
themselves. A PTS person may be in a state of deficiency or pathology which
prevents a ready recovery, but at the same time he will not fully recover
unless the PTS condition is also handled. For he became prone to deficiency
or pathological illness because he was PTS. And unless the condition is
relieved, no matter what medication or nutrition he may be given, he might
not recover and certainly will not recover permanently. This seems to
indicate that there are "other illnesses or reasons for illness besides
being PTS". To be sure there are deficiencies and illnesses just as there
are accidents and injuries. But strangely enough the person himself
precipitates them because being PTS predisposes him to them. In a more
garbled way, the medicos and nutritionists are always talking about
"stress" causing illness. Lacking full tech they yet have an inkling that
this is so because they see it is somehow true. They cannot handle it. Yet
they recognize it, and they state that it is a senior situation to various
illnesses and accidents. Well, we have the tech of this in more ways than
one.
What is this thing called "stress"? It is more than the medico defines
it-he usually says it comes from operational or physical shock and in this
he has too limited a view.
A person under stress is actually under a suppression on one or more
dynamics.
If that suppression is located and the person handles or disconnects,
the condition diminishes. If he also has all the engrams and ARC Breaks,
problems, overts and withholds audited out triple flow and if ALL such
areas of suppression are thus handled, the person would recover from
anything caused by "stress".
Usually the person has insufficient understanding of life or any
dynamic to grasp his own situation. He is confused. He believes all his
illnesses are true because they occur in such heavy books!
At some time he was predisposed to illness or accidents. When a serious
suppression then occurred he suffered a precipitation or occurrence of the
accident or illness, and then with repeated similar suppressions on the
same chain, the illness or tendency to accidents became prolonged or
chronic.
To say then that a person is PTS to his current environment would be
very limited as a diagnosis. If he continues to do or be something to which
the suppressive person or group objected he may become or continue to be
ill or have accidents.
Actually the problem of PTS is not very complicated. Once you have
grasped the two data first given, the rest of it becomes simply an analysis
of how they apply to this particular person. A PTS person can be markedly
helped in three ways: (a) gaining an understanding of the tech of the
condition (b) discovering to what or to whom he is PTS (c) handling or
disconnecting.
Someone with the wish or duty to find and handle PTSs has an additional
prior step: He must know how to recognize a PTS and how to handle them when
recognized. Thus it is rather a waste of time to engage in this hunt unless
one has been checked out on all the material on suppressives and PTSs and
grasps it without misunderstoods. In other words the first step of the
person is to get a grasp of the subject and its tech. This is not difficult
to do; it may be a bit more difficult to learn to run an E-Meter and
considerably more difficult to learn how to list for items, but there again
this is possible and is much easier than trying to grope around guessing.
With this step done, a person has no real trouble recognizing PTS
people and can have success in handling them which is very gratifying and
rewarding. Let us consider the easiest level of approach:
i) Give the person the simpler HCO Bs on the subject and let him
study them so that he knows the elements like "PTS" and "Suppressive". He
may just cognite right there and be much better. It has happened.
ii) Have him discuss the illness or accident or condition, without
much prodding or probing, that he thinks now may be the result of
suppression. He will usually tell you it is right here and now or was a
short time ago and will be all set to explain it (without any relief) as
stemming from his current environment or a recent one. If you let it go at
that he would simply be a bit unhappy and not get well as he is discussing
usually a late lock that has a lot of earlier material below it.
iii) Ask when he recalls first having that illness or having such
accidents. He will at once begin to roll this back and realize that it has
happened before. You don't have to be auditing him as he is all too willing
to talk about this in a most informal manner. He will get back to some
early this-lifetime point usually.
iv) Now ask him who it was. He will usually tell you promptly.
And, as you are not really auditing him and he isn't going backtrack and
you are not trying to do more than key him out, you don't probe any
further.
v) You will usually find that he has named a person to whom he is
still connected! So you ask him whether he wants to handle or disconnect.
Now as the sparks will really fly in his life if he dramatically
disconnects and if he can't see how he can, you persuade him to begin to
handle on a gradient scale. This may consist of imposing some slight
discipline on him such as requiring him to actually answer his mail or
write the person a pleasant good roads good weather note or to
realistically look at how he estranged them. In short what is required in
the handling is a low gradient. All you are trying to do is MOVE THE PTS
PERSON FROM EFFECT OVER TO SLIGHT GENTLE CAUSE.
vi) Check with the person again, if he is handling, and coach him
along, always at a gentle good roads and good weather level and no H E and
R (Human Emotion and Reaction) if you please.
That is a simple handling. You can get complexities such as a person
being PTS to an unknown person in his immediate vicinity that he may have
to find before he can handle or disconnect. You can find people who can't
remember more than a few years back. You can find anything you can find in
a case. But simple handling ends when it looks pretty complex. And that's
when you call in the auditor.
But this simple handling will get you quite a few stars in your crown.
You will be amazed to find that while some of them don't instantly recover,
medication, vitamins, minerals will now work when before they wouldn't. You
may also get some instant recovers but realize that if they don't you have
not failed.
The auditor can do "3 S&Ds" after this with much more effect as he
isn't working with a completely uninformed person.
"3 S&Ds" only fail because of wrong items or because the auditor did
not then put in triple rudiments on the items and then audit them out as
engrams triple flow.
A being is rather complex. He may have a lot of sources of suppression.
And it may take a lot of very light auditing to get him up to where he can
do work on suppressives since these were, after all, the source of his
overwhelm. And what he did to THEM might be more important than what they
did to HIM but unless you unburden HIM he may not get around to realizing
that.
You can run into a person who can only be handled by Expanded
Dianetics.
But you have made an entrance and you have stirred things up and gotten
him more aware and just that way you will find he is more at cause.
His illness or proneness to accidents may not be slight. You may
succeed only to the point where he now has a chance, by nutrition,
vitamins, minerals, medication, treatment, and above all, auditing, of
getting well. Unless you jogged this condition, he had no chance at all:
for becoming PTS is the first thing that happened to him on the subject of
illness or accidents.
Further, if the person has had a lot of auditing and yet isn't
progressing too well, your simple handling may all of a sudden cause him to
line up his case.
So do not underestimate what you or an auditor can do for a PTS. And
don't sell PTS tech short or neglect it. And don't continue to transfer or
push off or even worse tolerate PTS conditions in people.
You CAN do something about it.
And so can they.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
MISSION INTO TIME
L. Ron Hubbard
Published
September 1972
The central text of Mission Into Time (originally published in 1968 in
abridged form in a limited edition entitled (A Test of Whole Track Recall)
is edited from a lecture given by L. Ron Hubbard to members of the Sea
Organization and students of the Advanced Organization aboard a Sea
Organization vessel. It is a report on missions sent out to Sardinia,
Sicily and Carthage to see if specific evidence could be found to
substantiate L. Ron Hubbard's recall of incidents in his own past,
centuries ago, which occurred in these areas that he had not revisited
previously in the current lifetime. Maps, color photographs and diagrams
enhance his account, as do the historical background sketches of the areas
inspected.
The book begins with perhaps the best biography of L. Ron Hubbard in print.
It includes his explorations and expeditions in the physical universe in
this century on planet earth, as well as his explorations into the realm of
the mind.
In an essay on Whole Track Ron relates how whole track incidents began to
appear during Dianetic engram running as early as 1950, and how he,
assisted by Mary Sue Hubbard, rolled up his sleeves and started to
investigate the whole track in 1951. He says:
"For every one individual, existence consists of the physical universe and
everything that is
in it at this exact, present-time instant, and the track which consists of
everything that has been. And that is the total is-ness as far as this
thing called reality is concerned."
Ron goes on to show how it is that "unless we admit the evidence before us
that one has lived more than one life, we don't Clear anyone or make them
feel better. To make an O.T., one has to be willing to look at the time
track. Unless you pay attention to only one lifetime as a fallacy and audit
past lives and whole track, you make minimal gains."
Although this is excellent data for all Scientologists, new or advanced, it
can also be understood by newcomers, as all terms used in it are defined in
the excellent glossary. As a whole it demonstrates rather forcefully that,
as L. Ron Hubbard has said, "The weird idea is that one only lives but
once."
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 OCTOBER 1973
Remimeo
C/S Series 87
NULLING AND F/Ning PREPARED LISTS
A prepared list is one which is issued in an HCOB and is used to
correct cases. There are many of these. Notable amongst them is C/S 53 and
its corrections.
It is customary for the auditor to be required to F/N such a list. This
means on calling it that the whole list item by item is to F/N.
Now and then you get the extreme oddity of a list selected to exactly
remedy the case not reading but not F/Ning.
Of course this might happen if the list did not apply to the case (such
as an OT prepared list being used on a Grade IV, heaven forbid). In the
case of lists to correct listing, and in particular the C/S 53 series, it
is nearly impossible for this situation to occur.
A C/S will very often see that the auditor has assessed the list on the
pc, has gotten no reads, and the list did not F/N.
A "reasonable" C/S (heaven forbid) lets this go by.
Yet he has before him first-class evidence that the auditor
1. Has out-TRs in general,
2. Has no impingement whatever with TR-1,
3. Is placing his meter in the wrong position in the auditing
session so that he cannot see it, the pc and his worksheet,
4. That the auditor's eyesight is bad.
One or more of these conditions certainly exist.
To do nothing about it is to ask for catastrophe after catastrophe with
pcs and to have one's confidence in one's own C/Sing deteriorate badly.
An amazing number of auditors cannot make a prepared list read for one
of the above reasons.
Putting in suppress, invalidation or misunderstood words on the list
will either get a read or the list will F/N.
The moral of this is that prepared lists that do not read F/N. When
prepared lists that do not read do not F/N or when the auditor cannot get a
prepared list to F/N, serious auditing errors are present which will defeat
a C/S.
In the interest of obtaining results and being merciful on pcs, the
wise C/S never lets this situation go by without finding what it is all
about.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rhc.nt.rd
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 AUGUST 1971RC
Issue II
REVISED 21 OCTOBER 1973
REVISED 23 OCTOBER 1973
Remimeo REVISED 6 FEBRUARY 1974
(Only change is addition of No. 21a.)
EFFECTIVE AFTER 1st Thursday in
February 1974
PC COMPLETIONS-SECOND REVISION
This second revised issue cancels all earlier and any local org or
continental issues assigning Paid Completion Points.
To maintain uniformity any right of orgs or continental areas to assign
completion points is revoked. Orgs may request additions or amendments when
required but such become effective only when officially issued by Flag.
For statistical purposes an audited completion must be PAID and have
attested with an F/N VGIs and written a success story for the action. This
does NOT mean that you would interrupt an auditing rundown to send the pc
to Examiner and attest and success on each step of a rundown where
completion points are awarded for separate steps (e.g. Drug RD is one
attest when full RD completed. One then counts total points for the 3
sections of the RD).
Any quickie or incompetent completion falsifies the statistic and is
subject to fine or penalty.
Changes below are in this type style.
The completions list follows:
1. Interiorization Rundown - 1.
2. Life Repair-1.
3. Student Rescue Intensive-1.
4. Progress Pgm-1.
5. Hubbard Consultant (HC) List (Data Series)-1.
6. Word Clearing Method One-2.
7. C/S Series 54. (Pc Assessment Form and handling)-2.
8. Drugs, Medicine, Alcohol Class VIII Remedy (3 way recall,
secondaries, engrams)- 1.
9. Pains, Somatics, Emotions each reading drug fully handled by
R3R Triple 1. (E.g. 5 drugs fully handled = 5 points. Count this
way to conform with majority interpretation.)
10. Prior Assmt to Drugs-1.
11. Dianetics Completion-5.
12. ARC Str Wire Triple Exp-3 (no credit singles).
13. Each Expanded Grade-5 (no credit single or triple).
14. HCO B 24 July 69-1.
15. Touch and Dianetic Assists to fully handle injury or
postoperative or post-birth, etc-2.
16. Auditing repair-1/2.
17. GF Method 5 handled if not part of a repair-1/2.
18. GF 40 Expanded fully handled, lists and engrams, by itself
whether part of another program or not-3.
19. C/S Series 53 handled to F/N on all items (F/Ning assessment)
whether part of another program or not-l.
19a. Full false TA RD successfully resolved-2.
20. L3B Rundown-2.
21. PTS Rundown (full rundown)-2.
21a. Introspection Rundown-2.
22. Study Correction List fully handled - 2.
23. Int Rundown Correction List fully handled - 1/2.
24. Word Clearing Correction List fully handled-1/2.
25. Objective Processes (full battery to get pc off or handle Drugs
before Drug RD)-3.
26. Each Expanded Dianetics separate RD-1.
26a. Expanded Dianetics Rundown fully completed (in addition to
single points for each part)-5.
27. Incidental Rundowns such as Money Process if contained in an
LRH HCO B -1/2.
28. 12 1/2 Hour Intensive-5 points for each completed within the
week.
PENALTY: l point loss for every percent below 90% F/N VGIs Examiner for
the previous day. Example: 75% only F/N VGIs = 15 point loss.
GAIN: Add one point for every percent above 90% F/N VGIs at Examiner.
For every 9 points made I point may be added for staff auditing
providing it is actually delivered.
Items such as L-IC and L-4B are part of the session or action in which
they are used, or part of an auditing repair pgm, and are covered by the
points for those actions.
Student Co-auditing: There are no points calculated or used for student
co-auditing completions (except only as stated in the Student Completions
HCO B) or for free public completions done by students or public as these
can be part of student completion requirements.
SH
29. Power Set-up GF + 40 Method 5 and Handle-2.
30. POWER Single-5.
31. POWER TRIPLE-15.
32. Complete Your Case items as per regular auditing as above.
Added Bonus for Case flying and fully handled-5.
AO
33. Set-up for Solo or other advanced level: as per regular
auditing above.
33a. Case truly flying and ready for R6EW auditing. Added Bonus-5.
33b. Successful Case Consultation-1.
34. R6EW Solo Auditing Completion-5.
35. Clearing Course Solo Auditing Completion-10.
36. OT I Solo Auditing Completion-5.
37. OT II Solo Auditing Completion-5.
38. OT III Solo Auditing Completion-10.
39. OT III Exp Solo Auditing Completion-5.
40. OT IV Audited Section Completion-5.
Solo Aud Section Completion-5.
41. OT V Solo Auditing Completion 5.
42. OT VI Solo Auditing Completion-5.
43. OT VII Audited Section Completion - 5.
Solo Aud Section Completion-3.
44. OT VIII Points to be assigned when released.
PENALTIES
ALL ORG PENALTIES
45. For every pc in the area who is refunded after auditing (after
this HCO B is in effect). MINUS 25.
46. (Excepting AOs.) For every pc in the area who does not buy and
pay for further auditing to complete the grade or cycle he is on
(after this HCO B is in effect). MINUS 10.
47. For every pc who is backlogged more than one week. MINUS 5.
SH PENALTIES
48. For every pc who does not go on to Power after cleanup and case
handling (after this HCO B is in effect). MINUS 10.
49. Every pc who does not successfully complete his Power
including Va within three months after being enrolled on any part
of it (after date of this HCO B). MINUS 25.
50. Any pc found to have been run on Power more than once. MINUS
10.
51. Any Grade Va who has not enrolled on the R6EW Course within 3
months. Retroactive to start of org and subtracted each week. MINUS
1.
AO PENALTIES
52. "Nothing found" and no progress on any R6EW, Clear or OT Grade.
(Means Drug RD was unflat and Pre-OT not properly set up but put on
CC or OT Grades or both.) (Effective after date of this HCO B.)
MINUS 25.
53. Every R6EW, Clear or Pre-OT in AO's zone or area who has not
signed up for next grade within 3 months of finishing his last one
up to OT Vl (effective FROM DATE OF FOUNDING OF ORG AND SUBTRACTED
EACH WEEK). MINUS 1.
54. Every Solo Student who does not audit for one week while
assigned auditing on R6EW, Clear or on a Grade. (Effective from
date of this HCO B.) MINUS 10.
55. Any R6EW, Clear or Pre-OT who leaves while on the next grade
which is incomplete. (Effective from date of this HCO B.) MINUS 5.
56. Solo Auditor backlogged more than 24 hours for a Case
Consultation or Review. (Effective from date of this HCO B.) MINUS
5.
57. Any evidence of an R6EW, Clear or Pre-OT being evaluated for by
giving him the EP, being invalidated on his gains or assigned
unjust Ethics penalty by another student or staff member.
(Effective from date of this HCO B.) MINUS 50.
58. Any AO student now on SOLO Auditing who is found not to be able
to fully operate a meter, run engrams or who has errors traceable
to False TA HCO B not being applied. (Effective from date of this
HCO B.) MINUS 25.
Points for any omitted or added rundowns will have points issued on
request by Training and Services Aide.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt .rd jh
Copyright � 1971,1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The original issue of the above HCO B which is in Volume VII, page 371,
was revised by staff on 16 November 1972. It was then revised by LRH on 21
October 1973, adding the penalty sections and making the changes in this
type style. A further revision by LRH on 23 October 1973 added the words
"and pay for" and "or cycle" to number 46 and "R6EW, Clear or" to number
52. The 6 February 1974 revision adds number 21a to the completions list.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo
Pc Examiners
PRECLEAR DECLARE? PROCEDURE
(Reference: HCO PL 30 May 70, "Cutatives"
HCO PL 10 May 70, "Single Declare"
HCO B 24 Feb 72, C/S Series 71 A,
"Word Clearing OCAs".)
In order to ensure the results of Scientology, it is vital that
Examiner Declare? procedure is known and invariably applied.
1. Pc Examiner checks the folder to ensure that all processes run to EP
correctly with NO Out Tech uncorrected.
2. When folder passed as OK, get Qual I and I to call Tech Services for
the pc to be sent to the Pc Examiner.
3. Pc Examiner shows pc a written statement of the Ability Attained
from the Grade Chart or HCO B for that particular Grade or
completion and has the pc read it.
4. Ask pc: "Do you have any doubts or reservations concerning attesting
to (whatever the attest is)?" If the Examiner gets an instant read
on the question, he does not ask the attest question, and sends the
folder back to the C/S.
5. If no instant read, ask the attest question, "Would you like to
attest to ......"
6. If pc F/N VGIs on the Declare, indicate the F/N and end off the
cycle.
Note. The presence of any Bad Indicators, or no F/N, or high or low TA
or read on the "Doubts" question is the immediate signal to end off the
action smoothly and quickly.
Absolute honesty must be maintained by a Pc Examiner on every cycle
handled. Remember: The integrity of Scientology and the hope for Beings in
this Universe is entrusted to Examinations.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER l 973R
REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1973
(Revisions in this type style)
Remimeo
Tech
FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R
TO BE DONE ONLY BY AUDITORS WHOSE EYESIGHT, METER POSITION AND TR 1
HAVE BEEN CHECKED OUT AND WHO CAN THEREFORE MAKE A LIST READ ON A PC, SEE
THE READ AND MARK IT.
This action is primarily for use in Qual to handle timid tech staff who
back off from handling thetans or people or pcs or psychos or individuals.
It may also be used on public and as part of Integrity Processing.
ASSESSMENT LISTS
TERMINALS LIST EMOTIONS LIST
People _________ Blaming (item assessed) _________
Thetans _________ Failures with _________
Pcs _________ Apathetic about _________
Psychos _________ Neglect of _________
Individuals _________ Hopelessness regarding _________
Others _________ Propitiation toward _________
Girls _________ Terrified of _________
Women _________ Desperation about _________
Men _________ Fear of _________
Boys _________ Afraid of creating a bad
Children _________ effect on _________
Addicts _________ Afraid of consequences
PTSes _________ Regarding _________
Older People _________ Fear of invalidation by _________
Seniors _________ Fear of doing something
Important People _________ wrong with _________
Fear of being found out
by _________
Fear of failure with _________
Afraid to take responsibility
for _________
Anxious about _________
Pretense concerning _________
Unwilling to help _________
Contempt for _________
Anger at _________
Hatred of _________
Suppressing _________
HANDLING STEPS
1. Assess the TERMINALS LIST.
2. Using best reading item from the TERMINALS LIST assess the EMOTIONS
LIST. (Example: If "Girls" gave best read on TERMINALS LIST, then
assess EMOTIONS LIST using "Girls"-"Blaming Girls _" "Failures with
Girls" etc.)
3. Take best reading item from EMOTIONS LIST assessment. Run item R3-R
triple to F/N Cog VGIs and erasure.
4. Proceed to handle (R3-R) each reading item from EMOTIONS LIST
assessment in descending order of reads (largest to smallest read).
5. Repeat 2 to 4 with each reading item from the original TERMINALS
assessment.
6. When all reading items from both assessments handled, reassess the
TERMINALS LIST and repeat steps 2 to 5 on any items now reading.
7. This may be continued to an F/Ning Terminals List but somewhere along
the line pc should have major cognition with wide F/N and statement to
the effect that he no longer has any fear or back-off from people,
thetans, pcs, psychos, or individuals. End off at such a point.
8. Note that the charge on a terminal could be blown on R3-R on major
reading item from the Emotions List. In such a case the other reading
items from the emotions assessment would F/N when taken up. This would
be most likely to occur if "Fear of . . ." is run to good cog and then
further reading "Fear" or "Afraid of" items are attempted.
9. Should the person R/S on assessment or handling just continue the
action through to EP in the usual way but circle the R/S, note in front
of folder and on Auditor Report for later handling.
10. Whether done in Qual or Tech the assessment sheets, worksheets and
auditor report sheets must go into the pc folder and be recorded on the
summary sheet.
EP of the action is thetans or people or pcs or psychos or individuals, etc
solved and the person gotten off of any irrational back-off. We are in the
thetan and people business after all.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 NOVEMBER 1973
Issue I
Remimeo
All Levels
Flag Internes
LRH Comms
Reissued from
21st ADVANCED CLINICAL COURSE
TRAINING DRILLS
NAME: Anti-Q and A TR.
COMMANDS: Basically, "Put that (object) on my knee." (A book, piece of
paper, ashtray, etc can be used for object.)
POSITION. Student and Coach sitting facing each other at a comfortable
distance and one at which the Coach can reach the Student's knee with ease.
PURPOSE:
(a) To train Student in getting a Pc to carry out a command using formal
communication NOT Tone 40.
(b) To enable the Student to maintain his TRs while giving commands.
(c) To train the Student to not get upset with a Pc under formal
auditing.
MECHANICS: Coach selects small object (book, ashtray, etc) and holds it
in his hand.
TRAINING STRESS: Student is to get the Coach to place the object that he
has in his hand on the knee of the Student. The Student may vary his
commands as long as he maintains the Basic Intention (not Tone 40) to get
the Coach to place the object on the Student's knee. The Student is not
allowed to use any physical enforcement, only verbal commands. The Coach
should try and get the Student to Q and A. He may say anything he wishes to
try and get him off the track of getting the command executed. The Student
may say what he wishes in order to get the command done, as long as it
directly applies in getting the Coach to place the object on the Student's
knee.
The Coach flunks for:
(a) Any communication not directly concerned with getting the command
executed.
(b) Previous TR.
(c) Any upsetness demonstrated by Student.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1958, 1959, 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo Issue II
All Levels
Flag Internes C/S Series 89
F/N WHAT YOU ASK OR PROGRAM
Ref: HCO B 23 Dec 72 Integrity Processing Series 20
HCO B 21 Nov 73 The Cure of Q and A
When an Auditor asks one question but F/Ns something else it is simply
a version of QandA.
Example: AUDITOR: Do you have a problem? PC: (ramble-ramble) I was
thinking of last night's dinner. AUDITOR: That F/Ns.
Every few folders you pick up, if you can find examples of this:
The Auditor is not trained not to Q and A.
He is NOT getting answers to his questions.
When the Auditor starts something (such as a question or process) he
MUST F/N what he started EVEN THOUGH HE DID SOMETHING ELSE DURING IT AND
GOT AN F/N ON SOMETHING ELSE. HE MUST F/N THE ORIGINAL ACTION.
The result can be:
(a) Missed W/H phenomena.
(b) High or low TA an hour after the pc "F/Ned at Examiner".
(c) A stalled case.
(d) An undone program.
(e) An unhandled pc.
(f) Continual need for repair programs.
To get this disease out of an HGC requires that Auditors go through an
Anti-Q and A handling.
C/S Q AND A
C/Ses can also Q and A. They simply handle whatever the pc originates
to the Examiner or Auditor, over and over and on and on.
The result is:
A. Incomplete Programs.
B. Tripled or quadrupled C/S effort as the case never seems to get
solved.
C. Loads of repair programs.
Yet a C/S who does it will never look for it as THE primary error being
committed.
The remedy is to have the C/S do an Anti-Q and A program.
LRH: nt.jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1973 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[IP Series 20 has been converted to BTB 23 Dec 72R, IP Series 17R, Volume
IX, page 289.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo
All Auditors
All Levels
Flag Internes
LRH Comms
THE CURE OF Q AND A
MAN'S DEADLIEST DISEASE
Q and A is a dreadful malady which has to be cured before an Auditor
(or an Administrator) can get results.
THE DISEASE OF Q AND A
Auditor: Spot that wall. Pc: My neck hurts. Auditor: Has it been
hurting long? Pc: Ever since I was in the Army. Auditor: Are you in the
Army now? Pc: No but my father is. Auditor: Have you been in comm with your
father lately? Pc: I miss him. Auditor: That F/Ned, end of process. The
Auditor has failed to note that he never got the pc to spot the wall or
that he has run the pc all over the track flattening nothing, restimulating
the pc.
A DEADLY BACTERIA
When an Auditor asks a Question and F/Ns something else he can mess a
pc up badly.
Auditor: Do you have a withhold? That reads. Pc: It's just a 2D
perversion. What I was really thinking about was my raise I got today.
Auditor: That F/Ns. Pc (later in session): You run a lousy org here. Charge
too much .... Auditor in mystery, caves in. THAT IS SIMPLY Q AND A IN
ANOTHER COAT.
ADMINISTRATIVE DELIRIUM
When an Administrator Qs and As it puts him straight down the org board
and into a spin.
LRH Comm: You have a target here to move the file cases. Staff Member:
I didn't understand some of the words. LRH Comm: Here's a word clearing
order for Qual. (Next day.) LRH Comm: Did you go to the word clearer? Staff
Member: I'm on Medical Lines now. LRH Comm: How long have you been ill?
Staff Member: Since the Ethics Officer was mean to me. LRH Comm: I'll go
see about your ethics folder ....
And there goes the old soccer game. NO TARGET DONE BECAUSE THE
EXECUTIVE COULD NOT HANDLE Q AND A.
C/S Q AND A
Case Supervisors (blush for the thought) are often guilty of Q and A
and infect their area with its bacteria.
Pc to Examiner: I have a cold. C/S: Run spot spots to cure his cold. Pc
to Auditor: It's really I'm PTS to my Aunt. C/S: Do PTS RD on Aunt. Pc to
Examiner: It's really my foot. C/S: Do touch assist on foot ....
What C/S ever got a pc's program done that way?
Where you find undone programs in folders you find goofing Auditors and Q
and A type Case Supervisors.
FUMIGATION
There are definite cures for this dreadful and disgraceful malady. It
must be handled as it results in a breaking out of bogged cases and blows,
high and low TAs and very red faces when the Paid Completions Stat is
counted.
The Cure is pretty violent and very few have courage enough to go
through with it as their confront at the beginning is too low, what with
their no-interest items left in restim on their drug rundowns or no TRs to
begin with or no Supervisor when they took the Course.
The direct result of all this is a symptom known as "patty-cake". This
is a child game of clapping hands and putting palms together and has meant
since 1950 Dianetics NOT HANDLING CASES. The signs of patty-cake are a weak
slouching posture, bags under the eyes, a bowed spine and hangdog pathetic
eyes. The respiration is quick and panicky, the palms sweat and. one starts
at pins dropping in the next room.
However for those sturdy souls who want to Clear a planet and who
really want to handle things they can prop themselves up in bed and somehow
get through this program:
1. This HCOB starrate. _________
2. HCOB 24 May 62 "Q and A" starrate. _________
3. HCOB 13 Dec 61 "Varying Sec Check Questions". _________
4. HCOB 22 Feb 62 "Withholds, Missed and Partial". _________
5. HCOB 29 Mar 63 "Summary of Security Checking". _________
6. HCOB 7 Apr 64 "All Levels-Q and A". _________
7. TRs the Hard Way. _________
8. Upper Indoc a Rough Way. _________
9. Handling the Auditor's, C/S's or Administrator's Not Done
or No Interest item Drug RD. _________
10. 35 hours Op Pro by Dup in Co-Audit receiving and giving.
_________
11. HCOB 29 July 63 "Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
Training Drills", Section "Q and A Drill". _________
12. HCOB 20 Nov 73 Issue I Anti-Q and A Drill.
13. HCOB 20 Nov 73 Issue II "F/N What You Ask or Program".
_________
14. A final end result demonstrated that the person CAN SEE
SITUATIONS AND HANDLE THEM. _________
For, of course, the reason the person Qs and As is that he can't
confront or see the existing scene and so can't handle it.
Q and A is the DISEASE OF DODGING LIFE.
When such a person tries to get a question or program done and the
other person says or does something else, the Q and Aer goes into a sort of
overwhelm or cave-in and just rides along at effect.
PEOPLE WHO GET THINGS DONE ARE AT CAUSE. When they are not, they Q and
A.
Thus it IS a kind of illness. Chronic Overwhelm. It is NOT cured by
drugs or electric shocks or brain operations.
It is cured by making oneself strong enough in confront and handle to
live!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ntjh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo
Tech & Qual
All Levels
All Tech Checksheets
DRY AND WET HANDS
MAKE FALSE TA
A couple of years ago some auditors were solving high TA problems by
putting hand cream on the pc's hands when they were calloused and talcum
powder on a pc's hands when they were too wet. Since no research had been
done they were censured.
Research has now been done on this matter of dry and wet hands.
Apparently when a person has taken certain medicines or chemicals, or
uses detergent soaps or is in contact with certain chemicals (such as those
in some furniture polishes) the ordinary skin oils vanish. These oils are
needed to make an electrical contact with the cans.
When these oils are absent, there is no adequate electrical contact and
the "TA is High".
When a person is deficient in certain minerals or vitamins such as
magnesium or B complex, his hands can be excessively wet.
Either of these two conditions in hands or feet can produce an
incorrect TA position.
The dry condition produces a false high TA.
The overly wet condition produces a false low TA.
The TA depends on normally moist hands. This does not mean the meter
works on "sweat". It does mean the meter works only when there is a correct
electrical contact.
Too much and too greasy hand cream could produce too low a TA.
Too much powder or drier could produce too high a TA.
Therefore one must not go to extremes.
DRY HANDS
The excessively "dry" hand is seen as shiny or polished looking. It
feels very dry.
The correct treatment is to use a "vanishing cream" (obtainable from
any cosmetics store) not a greasy hand cream.
The "vanishing cream" is so called because it rubs all the way into the
skin and leaves no excess grease.
This restores normal electrical contact.
There are many such creams. It makes no difference which is used so
long as it vanishes into the skin.
It is doubtful if it would have to be applied more than once-at session
start-as it lasts for a long while.
This would apply to some footplate cases as well (whose hands are
defective or too heavily calloused).
If a cream leaves smears on a can, it is too heavily applied or too
little absorbed.
Vanishing type cream is usually smeared on, rubbed in and can then be
thoroughly wiped off. The hands (or feet) will usually produce, then, a
normal TA and meter response.
WET HANDS
Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are many brands
of these, often a powder or spray.
It can be wiped off after application and should work for two or three
hours.
It can be applied to hands or feet (for footplates).
If the TA then goes too high, use vanishing cream on top of it.
SUMMARY
While much work could be done still, the above is enough for a
practical result.
WARNING
Hi TAs and Lo TAs do not widely F/N. If you are getting wide persistent
F/N with the TA too high (above 3) or too low (below 2) you have a pc whose
hands are too dry or too wet. Using this HCO B should correct it and in
future sessions you should continue the remedy on that pc.
NOTHING in this HCO B excuses the misreading or falsifying of a TA. Get
the TA in normal range with this HCO B before you start calling processes
ended.
C/S 53 RF and the False TA Checklist HCO B 29 Feb 1 972R, Revised 23
Nov 73, are your tools for handling too high and too low TAs.
The only other conditions I know of that make an auditor mess up a pc's
TA are:
(a) A discharged meter (registers high).
(b) An incorrectly set meter by trim button.
(c) A "fleeting F/N" where the pc F/Ns so briefly the auditor
misses it and overruns.
(d) Bad TRs.
(e) Unflat processes.
(f) Overrun processes.
(g) Heavy drugs or medicines.
False TA often comes to light when the auditor runs out of reasons it
is high or low and it dawns on him that he is dealing with false TA. In the
latter case he should know all MATERIALS ON THIS SUBJECT OF FALSE TA (given
on HCO B 29 Feb 1972R, Revised 23 Nov 73, as references) AND REMEDY THE
FALSE TA SITUATION AND THEN RESUME NORMAL AUDITING. He must not go on
calling high or low TA F/Ns just by assuming the TA is false.
Given a contact the meter always tells the truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:clb.rd Founder
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973
(Cancels HCOB 31 Dec 1971 RC)
Remimeo Reissued 25 Nov 73
C/S Series 53RF
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down
into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal
range to get pc's case handled better.
_______________________________________________________PC
Name________________Date
1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the
items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD [to
what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RF should be reassessed
and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment.
A. Interiorization __________ Invisible __________
Went in __________ Black __________
Go in __________ Loss __________
Can't get in __________
Want to get out __________ F. Same thing run twice __________
Kicked out of spaces __________ Same action done by
another auditor __________
B. List errors __________
Overlisting __________ G. Doing something with
Wrong items __________ mind between sessions __________
Upset with giving __________ Some other practice
__________
items to auditor __________
H. Word Clearing errors __________
C. Some sort of W/H __________ Study errors __________
Are you withholding
something __________ I. False TA __________
Is another withholding Wrong sized cans __________
something from you __________ Tired hands __________
Are others withholding Dry hands or feet __________
something from others __________ Wet hands or feet
__________
Has another committed Loosens can grip __________
overts on you __________
Have you committed J. Auditor overwhelming __________
any overts __________ Feel attacked __________
Have others committed Something wrong with
overts on others __________ F/Ns __________
Not saying __________ Items really didn't read __________
Problems __________ Bad auditing __________
Protest __________ Incomplete actions __________
Don't like it __________
Audited over out ruds __________ K. Can't have __________
Feel sad __________ Low Havingness __________
Rushed __________
Tired __________ L. PTS __________
ARC Brk __________ Suppressed __________
Upset __________
M. Something went on too
D. Drugs __________ long __________
LSD __________ Went on by a release
Alcohol __________ point __________
Pot __________ Overrun __________
Medicine __________ Auditor kept on going __________
Over-repair __________
E. Engram in restimulation __________ Puzzled by auditor
Same engram run twice __________ keeps on __________
Can't see engrams too Stops __________
well __________
N. Something else __________
O. Repairing a TA that __________ Physically ill __________
isn't high Faulty Meter __________
Repairing a TA that Nothing wrong
__________
isn't low __________
2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show
where mass lies.
A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int
RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCOB 29 Oct 71 Amended 31
Dec 71.)
If pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD
providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R.
B. If any of these read, do an L4B on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4B in general. You
can go over an L4B several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4B gives nothing but F/Ns.
C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more
than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the
others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for
each or 17 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On
out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR HCOB 30 June 71
Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk
of long duration.)
D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per
C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has
had a Drug RD, do L3B on it, and handle.
E. If any of these, do L3B and handle according to what is stated to do
on L3B.
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S
it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and
if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List
to the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCOBs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71, 15 Feb 72, 18
Feb 72, 29 Feb 72, HCOB 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the
bypassed charge with ( I ) Assess for best read (a) TA worries (b) F/N
worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3)
Rehab a time he felt really keyed out to F/N.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through
an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. These items are all
2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow if qualified).
N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per I above.
General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as
nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to
handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return
to the C/S.
LRH: BW: BL:nt.jh
Copyright � 1971,1972, 1973 Revised by
by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 DECEMBER 1973
Remimeo
All Auditors
All Levels
Flag Internes
LRH Comms
THE REASON FOR Q AND A
Q and A means "Question and Answer".
When the term Q and A is used it means one did NOT get an answer to his
question. It also means not getting compliance with an order but accepting
something else.
Example: Auditor: Do birds fly? Pc: I don't like birds. Auditor: What
don't you like about birds? FLUNK. It's a Q and A. The right reply would be
an answer to the question asked and the right action would be to get the
original question answered. TR 4 (handling origins) can apply here. The
moment TR 4 is violated (Ack and return the pc to original Question) and
the original unanswered question is not again asked the Auditor just drifts
along with the pc. Things get restimulated, nothing gets really handled or
run.
In Administration the same thing can happen. The executive gives an
order, the junior says or does something else, the executive does not
simply TR 4 it and get the original order done, and the result is chaos.
Executive: Phone Mr. Schultz and tell him our printing order will be
there this afternoon. Junior: I don't know his number. Executive: Don't you
have a phone book? Junior: The phone company didn't send one this year as
our bill was overdue. Executive (the fool) goes to Accounts to see what
about the phone bill. Mr. Schultz never gets his call. The printing order
arrives but Mr. Schultz doesn't know it ....
Example: Executive: Do target 21 now. Junior: I don't have any issue
files. Executive: What happened to them? Junior: Mimeo goofed. Executive:
I'll go see Mimeo ....
DISPERSAL
Q and A is simply Postulate Aberration.
Aberration is non-straight line by definition.
A sick thetan who is all caved in can't direct a postulate at anything.
When he tries, he lets it wobble around and go elsewhere.
The difference between a Degraded Being and an OT is simply that the DB
can't put out a postulate or intention in a direct line or way and make it
hold good.
The insane are a great example of this. They are insane because they
have evil intentions. But they can't even make these stick. They may intend
to burn down the house but they usually wind up watering the rug or do some
other non sequitur thing. It's not that they don't mess things up. The
whole point here is that they can't even properly destroy what they intend
to destroy. Even their evil intentions wobble, poor things.
But not all people who Q and A are insane.
When a person is running at effect he Qs and As.
He is confronted by life, he does not confront it.
He is usually a bit blind to things as his ability to look AT is turned
back on him by his lack of beam power. Thus he gives the appearance of
being unaware.
His emotional feeling is overwhelm.
His mental state is confusion.
He starts for B, winds up at-A.
Other not too well intentioned people can play tricks on a Qer and Aer.
When they don't want to answer or comply they artfully bring about a Q and
A.
Example: Bosco does not want to staple the mimeo issue. He knows his
senior Qs and As. So we get this. Senior: Staple that issue with the big
stapler. Bosco: I hurt my thumb. Q and A Senior: Have you been to see the
Medical Officer? Bosco: He wouldn't look at it. Q and A Senior: I'll go
have a word with him. (Departs.) Bosco gets back to reading "Jesse James
Rides Again" humming softly to himself. For HIS trouble is, he Qs and As
with the Mest Universe!
BODY Q AND A
Some people Q and A with their bodies. The body is, after all, composed
of Mest. It follows the laws of Mest.
One of these laws is Newton's first law of motion: INERTIA. This is the
tendency of a Mest object to remain motionless until acted upon by an
exterior force. Or to continue in a line of motion until acted upon by an
exterior force.
Well, the main force around that is continually acting on a human body
is a thetan, the being himself.
The body will remain at rest (since it is a Mest Object) until acted
upon by the thetan that is supposed to be running it.
If that being is an aberrated non-straight line being THE BODY REACTS
ON HIM MORE THAN HE REACTS ON THE BODY. Thus he remains motionless or very
slow. When the body is in unwanted motion, the being does not deter the
motion as the body is acting upon him far more than he is reacting on the
body.
As a result, one of the manifestations is Q and A. He wants to pick up
a piece of paper. The body inertia has to be overcome to do so. So he does
not reach for the paper, he just leaves the hand where it is. This would be
no action at all. If he then weakly forces the motion, he finds himself
picking up something else like a paper clip, decides he wants that anyway
and settles for it. Now he has to invent why he has a paper clip in his
hand. His original intention never gets executed.
Some people on medical lines are just there not because of actual
illness but because they are just Qing and Aing with their body.
People also Q and A with themselves. They want to stop drinking and
can't. They want to stop or change something about themselves or their body
and then disperse off onto something else.
Freud read all sorts of dire and awful things into simple Q and A. He
invented intentions the person must have that made him "sublimate". All
Freud succeeded in doing was making the person introspective looking for
wrong whys.
The right why was simple-the person could not go in a straight line to
an
objective and/or could not cease to do something he was compulsively doing.
The very word ABERRATION contains the idea of this-no straight line but
a bent one.
THE CURE FOR THIS SORT OF THING (Q and A with a body) IS OBJECTIVE
PROCESSES.
And a very willing and bright thetan CAN simply recognize it for what
it is-not enough push!
And instead of going to the MO for a slight ache, he just pushes on
through.
As the ache is a recoil of body Q and A in a lot of cases, the ache
itself goes away as soon as one simply pushes through.
Painters and artists buy the idea they are benefited by aberration. "Be
glad you are neurotic" was a trick being played by the late and unlamented
psychiatrists on artists.
One paints because he can push into execution what he visualizes. The
best painters were the least aberrated.
Greenwich Village or Left Bank artists, when they don't paint, never
suspect it's because they just can't overcome hand inertia to push a paint
brush!
People live Q and A lives. They never become what they desire to be
because they Q and A with life about it.
Schopenhauer, the German philosopher of doom, even had a dirty crack
about being able to do things: "Stubbornness is the will taking the place
of the intellect." By this, one is "intellectual" if he Qs and As.
SUMMARY
People who can't get things done are simply Qing and Aing with people
and life.
People who CAN get things done just don't Q and A.
All great truths are simple.
This is a major one.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.jh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 DECEMBER 1973
Remimeo
C/S Series 90
THE PRIMARY FAILURE
References: HCO B 28 Feb 1971, C/S Series 24,
"Metering Reading Items", and
HCO B 15 Oct 1973, C/S Series 87,
"Nulling and F/Ning Prepared Lists".
A C/S who cannot get a result on his pcs will find the most usual
biggest improvement by getting the offending Auditors' ASSESSING handled.
We used to say that "the Auditor's TRs were out" as the most
fundamental reason for no results.
This is not specific enough.
THE MOST COMMON REASON FOR FAILED SESSIONS IS THE INABILITY OF THE
AUDITOR TO GET READS ON LISTS.
Time after time I have checked this back as the real reason.
It became evident when one could take almost any "null" (no read) list
in a pc's folder, give it and the pc to an Auditor who COULD assess and get
nice reads on it with consequent gain.
Example: Pc has a high TA. C/S orders a C/S 53RF. List is null. Pc goes
on having a high TA. C/S gets inventive, case crashes. Another C/S and
another Auditor takes the same pc and the same list, gets good reads,
handles. Case flies again.
What was wrong was:
(a) The Auditor's TR 1 was terrible.
(b) The Auditor couldn't meter.
REMEDY
One takes the above two reference HCO Bs and gets their points fully
checked on the flunking Auditor.
The C/S gets the Auditor's TR 1 corrected. In doing the latter one may
find a why for the out TR 1 like a notion one must be soft-spoken to stay
in ARC or the Auditor is imitating some other Auditor whose TR 1 is faulty.
QUAL CRAMMING
It can happen that these actions are reported done in Qual and the
Auditor still flubs.
In this case the C/S has to straighten out Qual Cramming by doing the
above reference HCO Bs on the Cramming Officer and getting the Cramming
Officer's TR I ideas unscrewed and straight.
REQUIREMENTS
It takes correct metering and IMPINGEMENT to make a list read.
If the auditor does not have these, then drug lists, Dianetic lists,
correction lists will all go for nothing.
As the prepared list is the C/S's main tool for discovery and
correction an auditor failure to get a list to respond or note it then
defeats the C/S completely.
SUMMARY
THE ERROR OF AN AUDITOR BEING UNABLE TO GET A LIST TO READ ON A METER
IS A PRIMARY CAUSE OF C/S FAILURE.
To win, correct it!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt. jh
Copyright � 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 DECEMBER 1973
Remimeo
All Levels
Add Level II
Ethics Officers THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H
Masters at Arms AND CONTINUOUS OVERT
C/Ses WITH DATA ON DEGRADED BEINGS
AND FALSE PTS CONDITIONS
Reference: (1) Tape List and HCO B List of Level II,
Page 4 HCO P/L 26.1.72, Issue VI, concerning Withholds and Overts.
(2) "Admin Know-How-Alter-Is and Degraded Beings", HCO B 22 Mar 67.
There are two special cases of withholds and overts. They do not occur
in all cases by a long ways. But they do occur on a few cases. These are
CONTINUOUS MISSED WITHHOLDS and CONTINUOUS OVERTS.
This is not quite the same as "The Continuing Overt Act" HCO B 29
September 65. In that type the person is repeating overt acts against
something usually named.
THE CONTINUOUS MISSED W/H
A Continuous Missed Withhold occurs when a person feels some way and
anyone who sees him misses it.
Example: A doctor feels very unconfident of his skill. Every patient
who sees him misses the fact that he is not confident. This reacts as a
missed withhold.
It is of course based upon some bad incident that destroyed his
confidence (usually of an engramic intensity).
But as the person actively withholds this, then those seeing him miss
the withhold.
This could work in thousands of variations. A woman feels continuous
disdain for her child but withholds it. The child therefore continuously
misses a withhold. All the phenomena of the missed w/h would continuously
react against the child.
Probably all dishonest social conduct brings about a Continuous Missed
Withhold. The politician who hates people, the minister who no longer
believes in God, the mechanic who privately believes he is a jinx on
machinery, these all then set up the phenomena of missed withholds on
themselves and can dramatize it in their conduct.
THE CONTINUOUS OVERT
A person who believes he is harmful to others may also believe that
many of his common ordinary actions are harmful.
He may feel he is committing a Continuous Overt on others.
Example: A clothing model believes she is committing a fraud on older
women by displaying clothing to them in which they will look poorly. In her
estimation this is a Continuous Overt Act. Of course all older women miss
it on her.
Appearance, just being alive, can be considered by some as an overt.
Missed withhold phenomena will result.
DEGRADED BEINGS
The Continuous Withhold and Continuous Overt are probably a basis of
feeling degraded.
Degraded Beings, as described in "Admin Know-How-Alter-Is and Degraded
Beings", HCO B 22 Mar 67, are that way at least in part because they have
some Continuous Missed Withhold or a fancied Continuous Overt Act.
This makes them feel degraded and act that way.
HANDLING
One can add to any program a check for a Continuous Missed Withhold or
Continuous Overt as an additional version of rudiments.
A master question, which could be broken down into three lists which
would have to be done by the laws of L&N, would be, "When anyone looks at
you what feeling (action, attitude) of yours do they miss?" Then, "When was
it missed?" "Who missed it?" and "What did he do that made you believe it
had been missed?"
Another approach, less dangerous in that lists aren't made, would be:
For Continuous Missed Withhold the question could be, "Is there some
way you feel that others don't realize?" And with 2wc uncover it. Then ask,
"Who misses this?" with answer, followed by, "When has someone missed it?"
with E/S to an earlier time. Followed by, "What did he (or she) do that
made you think he (or she) knew?" This will key it out and can change
behavior.
For Continuous Overt Act it would be, "Is there something you do that
others do not know about?" With 2wc to cover it and get what it is. Then
ask, "Who has not found out about it?" with an answer. And then, "When did
someone almost find out?" "What did he (or she) do that made you think he
(or she) knew?"
Each of the above questions should be F/Ned.
MOTION
People who have Continuous Withholds or Overts tend to be very slow,
flubby and impositive. They have to be very careful. And they make
mistakes. Slowness or robotness are keys to the presence of Continuous
Missed Withholds or Overts.
PTS
Quite often a case is FALSELY LABELED PTS when in fact it is really a
matter of Continuous Missed Withholds and Continuous Overts.
When a "PTS" person does not respond to PTS handling easily then you
know you are dealing with Continuous Missed Withholds and/or Continuous
Overts.
SUMMARY
These conditions are not present in all cases. When they are you have a
Degraded Being. When a "PTS" person does not respond to PTS handling, try
Continuous Missed Withholds and Continuous Overts. You can prevent blows,
handle much HE and R and change character in this way.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1973 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 JANUARY 1974
Remimeo
ASSIST SUMMARY
ADDITION
TO LIST OF REFERENCES ADD:
HCO B 11 July 73 ASSIST SUMMARY
HCO B 6 Jan 74 ASSIST SUMMARY ADDITION
ANY TAPE OR MATERIALS ON "PRIOR CONFUSION"
ANY TAPE OR MATERIALS ON "POSTULATES AND INJURIES"
(1952 Autumn, London Lectures, etc)
HCO Bs ON MISTAKES BEING MADE IN PRESENCE OF
SUPPRESSION, 1968.
ADD TO PAGE 4 OF HCO B 11 July 73 after POSTULATE TWO-WAY COMM:
PRIOR CONFUSION: Fixed ideas follow a period of confusion. This is also
true of engrams that hang up as physical injury. Slow recovery after an
engram has been run can be caused by the Prior Confusion mechanism. The
engram of accident or injury can be a stable item in a confusion. By 2-way
comm see if a confusion existed prior to the accident, injury or illness.
If so, it may be 2wced earlier similar to F/N.
MYSTERY POINT: Often there is some part of an incident which is
mysterious to a preclear. The engram itself may hang up on a mystery. A
thetan could be called a "mystery sandwich" in that he tends to stick in on
mysteries. 2wc any mysterious aspect of the incident. 2wc it earlier
similar to F/N Cog VGIs.
SUPPRESSIVE PRESENCE: Mistakes or accidents or injuries occur in the
presence of suppression. One wants to know if any such suppressive
influence or factor existed just prior to the incident being handled. This
could be the area it occurred in or persons the preclear had just spoken
to. 2wc any suppressive or invalidative presence that may have caused a
mistake to be made or the accident to occur. 2wc E/S to F/N Cog VGIs.
AGREEMENT: Get any agreement the person may have had in or with the
incident. There is usually a point where the person agrees with some part
of the scene. If this point is found it will tend to unpin the pc from
going on agreeing to be sick or injured.
PROTEST: 2wc any protest in the incident.
PREDICTION: The person is usually concerned about his recovery. Undue
worry about it can extend the effects into the future. 2wc (a) how long
he/she expects to take to recover. (b) Get the person to tell you any
predictions others have made about it. 2wc it to an F/N Cog VGIs. Note-
avoid getting the person to predict it as a very long time by getting him
to talk about that further.
LOSSES: A person who has just experienced a loss may become ill. This
is particularly true of colds. 2wc anything the pc may have lost to F/N.
PRESENT TIME: An injured or sick person is out of present time. Thus
running HAVINGNESS in every assist session is vital. This not only remedies
havingness but also brings the preclear to present time.
HIGH OR LO TA: A C/S 53 RF should be used to get the TA under control
during assists if it cannot be gotten down. It must be done by an auditor
who knows how to meter and can get reads.
ILLNESS FOLLOWING AUDITING: It can occur that a pc gets ill after being
audited where the "auditing" is out tech. When this occurs or is suspected,
a Green Form should be assessed only by an auditor who can meter and whose
TR 1 gets reads. The GF reads are then handled. Out Interiorization, bad
lists, missed w/hs, ARC Breaks and incomplete or flubbed engrams are the
commonest errors.
BEFORE-AFTER: Where an injured or ill pc is so stuck that he has a
fixed picture that does not move, one can jar it loose by asking him to
recall a time before the incident and then asking him to recall a time
after it. This will "jar the engram loose" and change the stuck point.
UNCONSCIOUSNESS: A pc can be audited even if in a coma. The processes
are objective, not significance processes. One process is to use his hand
to reach and withdraw from an object such as a pillow or blanket. One makes
the hand do it while giving the commands. One can even arrange a "signal
system" where the pc is in a coma and cannot talk by holding his hand and
telling him to squeeze one's hand once for yes, twice for no. It is
astonishing that the pc will often respond and he can be questioned this
way.
TEMPERATURE ASSISTS: There is an HCO B on how to do assists that bring
down the temperature. Holding objects still repetitively is the basic
process.
Quite often an injury or illness will miraculously clear up before one
has run all the steps possible. If this is the case one should end off any
further assist.
All auditing of injured or ill people must be kept fairly light. Errors
in TRs (such as a bad TR 4), errors in tech rebound on them very heavily.
An ill or injured person can easily be audited into a mess if the processes
are too heavy for him to handle and if the auditor is goofing. Very exact
in-tech, good TRs, good metering sessions are all that should be tolerated
in assists.
An auditor has it in his power to make pcs recover spectacularly. That
power is in direct proportion to his flawlessness as an auditor. Only the
most exact and proper tech will produce the desired result.
If you truly want to help your fellows, that exact skill and those
results are very well worth having.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1974
Remimeo
THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973!
THE INTROSPECTION RD
(Steps of list 1 to 17
are subject to possible correction.)
I have made a technical breakthrough which possibly ranks with the
major discoveries of the Twentieth Century. It is certainly the greatest
advancement of 1973 and is now being released after a final wrap-up of
research. It is called the Introspection Rundown.
The purpose of the Introspection RD is to locate and correct those
things which cause a person to fixate his attention inwardly, on himself or
his bank. This RD extroverts the person so that he can see his environment
and therefore handle and control it.
RESEARCH
In 1970 the actual cause of PSYCHOSIS was isolated (as given in HCO B
C/S Series 22, "Psychosis", 28 November 1970). In the ensuing years this
has been proven beyond doubt to be totally correct.
But what is a psychotic break?
Man has never been able to solve the psychotic break. In fact, human
beings are actually afraid of a person in a psychotic break and in
desperation turn to psychiatry to handle.
Psychiatry, desperate in its turn, without effective tech, resorts to
barbarities such as heavy drugs, ice picks, electric and insulin shock
which half kill the person and only suppress him. The fact remains there
has never been a cure for the psychotic break until now.
The key is WHAT CAUSED THE PERSON TO INTROSPECT BEFORE THE PSYCHOTIC
BREAK.
The breakthrough was made on a person who, after a series of wrong
indications, went into a full-blown psychotic break-violence, destruction
and all.
The psychiatrist at this point would have sharpened up his ice pick,
filled his syringes with the most powerful (and deadly) drugs he could find
and turned up the volts. His "handling" would have been a final destruction
of the individual.
What was done was an auditor went into the room, sat the person down
and corrected the last severe point of wrong indication. Subsequent times
of wrong indication in his life were cleared up, the person came out of the
psychotic break and into p.t.
THIS MEANS THE LAST REASON TO HAVE PSYCHIATRY AROUND IS GONE.
The psychotic break, the last of the "unsolvable" conditions that can
trap a person, has been solved.
And it's quite simple, really.
THEORY
Def. INTROSPECTION: "(L. from introspicere, to look within) a looking
into one's own mind, feelings, reactions, etc; observation and analysis of
oneself." Webster's New World Dictionary.
Def. INTROVERSION: "(from intro- + L. vertere, to turn) 2.... a
tendency to direct one's interest upon oneself rather than upon external
objects or events." Webster's New World Dictionary.
The essence of the Introspection RD is looking for and correcting all
those things which CAUSED the person to look inward worriedly and wrestle
with the mystery of some incorrectly designated error. The result is
continual inward looking or self auditing without relief or end.
In a normal person this becomes a diminished activity, unhappiness or
illness. In an R/Ser this becomes insanity and a psychotic break occurs at
the last severe point of wrong indication.
AUDITOR TRAINING
Auditors selected to do this RD must have recently done a HARD TRs
Course and the Anti-Q&A materials.
They must be able to recognize a ROCK SLAM, which is a particular E-
Meter phenomenon. They must be Class IV Expanded Dianetics auditors of
proven skill on routine cases. They must not themselves be R/Sers. (The
last requisite is waived in a self-salvage co-audit group where all R/S.)
They need flawless TRs, no Q&A. This Rundown is very simple but cannot
be flubbed, as that will compound the errors and cause further
introspection in the pc. It is better not to deliver this RD than to flub
any part of it. C/Ses take note. It is an Ethics Offense to attempt this
Rundown without the auditor having done the prerequisite training and a
further offense for an auditor to flub on it.
STEPS OF THE RD
(On a normal person do Steps 000, 0000, 00000
and 000000.)
O. On a person in a psychotic break isolate the person wholly with all
attendants completely muzzled (no speech).
00. Give Vitamins (B Complex, including niacinamide) and minerals
(calcium and magnesium) to build the person up.
000. Locate by study or research of the person's case or via associates or
2-way comm the latest point of introversion which will be just at
the beginning of the current psychotic break.
0000. Indicate the substance of it to the person to release the By-
Passed Charge.
00000. Indicate and handle the point of introversion and its chain.
(Indication by itself can be a separate step before auditing.)
000000. Continue the RD as below.
1. Verify/correct all L&N lists if not already done correctly.
2. Verify/correct all Why Finding, 3 May PLs, PTS Interviews, etc.
(See C/S Series 78.)
3. Word Clear the definitions of "Introspection",
"Introversion" and "Extroversion".
4. Trace back the chain of being told his purposes were incorrect.
To F/N Cog VGIs.
5. Trace back the chain of being "told" he had purposes that he
didn't actually have. To F/N Cog VGIs.
6. Trace back the chain of being asked for things that didn't
exist. To F/N Cog VGIs.
7. Trace back the chain of someone saying W/Hs existed that
didn't. To F/N Cog VGIs.
8. Trace back the chain of not having his withholds accepted. To
F/N Cog VGIs.
9. Trace back the chain of someone accusing him of something he
hadn't done. To F/N Cog VGIs.
10. Trace back the chain of accusing himself of things he hadn't
done. To F/N Cog VGIs.
11. Trace back the chain of being heavily invalidated for something
he didn't do. To F/N Cog VGIs.
12. Trace back the chain of being validated for something he knew
was wrong. To F/N Cog VGIs.
13. Trace back the chain of being told he was PTS when he wasn't.
To F/N Cog VGIs.
14. Trace back the chain of being interrogated for no reason. To
F/N Cog VGIs.
15. Trace back the chain of being told he was someone he wasn't. To
F/N Cog VGIs.
16. Trace back the chain of not having his actual identity
believed. To F/N Cog VGIs.
17. Objective Havingness to F/N.
At any time after Step 2 Objective Havingness should be done at session
end. If one of the chains in Steps 3-15 turns out to be false the pc will
introvert further. In such a case indicate the fact of it having been
unnecessary and get an F/N. Then run Objective Havingness. If the TA goes
high (or low) and won't come into range, assess a C/S 53RF and handle.
In the case of a pc in a psychotic break, the C/S would have to locate
the last severe wrong indication, indicate the fact to the pc and get it
corrected (as with a wrong item) as the first action.
EXTROVERSION
Def. EXTROVERSION: ". . . Means nothing more than being able to look
outward...." "An extroverted personality is one who is capable of looking
around the environment...." "A person who is capable of looking at the
world around him and seeing it quite real and quite bright is of course in
a state of extroversion." (Problems of Work.)
The end phenomena of the Introspection RD is the person extroverted, no
longer looking inward worriedly in a continuous self-audit without end.
The EP on a person in a psychotic break is the end of the psychotic
break.
The RD is very simple and its results are magical in effectiveness.
Flubs can wreck it so don't permit them.
You have in your hands the tool to take over mental therapy in full.
You need not fear the insane or the psychotic break any longer.
Here also is the cure for the continual self-auditing pc who is dug
into his bank. It works on all pcs in fact with rave results.
Do it flawlessly and we all win.
THIS PLANET IS OURS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.nt jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JANUARY 1974
Remimeo
DIANETICS
R3R COMMANDS
HAVE BACKGROUND DATA
A Cramming action has just uncovered that at least some Dianetic
Auditors do not know the reason for each R3R command and, not knowing why
the commands exist, miss on cases.
A Cramming Officer or Supervisor can achieve a remarkable result by
making an Auditor get the why of each R3R Dianetic command from the
original materials.
The following development and use of this Cramming technique by Mike
Mauerer follows:
"CASE HISTORY"
"George Baillie, a Flag Interne, working on his Dianetics OK to Audit,
was ordered to study the 1963 Dn HCO Bs ("Time Track and Engram Running by
Chains" Bulletins, Bulletins 1 and 2). He read the HCO Bs but had not
studied them vigorously enough and for application.
"As Interne Supervisor I worked with him covering these HCO Bs and
Original Thesis. During the course of this action many confusions
(primarily roteness) were handled. Among them were things like 'What is the
purpose of Step 6 of R3R, "What do you see?" ' He had previously thought it
was to 'orient' the Pc to the incident or some such, but basically it came
down to the fact he had never worked out the purpose of the command as
related to the mechanics of the bank and time track. After some working he
finally got the fact that Command 4 (duration) is to turn on the visio and
that before moving the Pc through the incident one would have to know the
Pc had visio so he could move through. Conversely, if the picture was not
'turned on' then the duration would have to be corrected. Another was the
Step 3 Command (Move to that incident) on which the Interne thought that by
repeating the auditing command when the Pc 'couldn't get there' you would
handle the time track. This of course is failure to handle an origination
and failure to handle time for the Pc. He finally realized that obviously
the Pc didn't have the correct date in the first place and it is the
Auditor's action to find and get the correct date and thus move the somatic
strip to that incident.
"Each command of R3R was taken up and its purpose demo'd out against
the basic definitions and mechanics of the time track. One other of the
things discovered by this Interne was that Command Nine (What happened?)
has a purpose of running out the Locks created in PT, in session, by virtue
of the fact that you're reminding the Pc of Secondaries and Engrams right
there! (This is of course covered in Original Thesis.)
"Probably the most stunning and revealing thing covered was the fact that
in Original Thesis Chapter 'Exhaustion of Engrams', para 3, it says, 'The
principle of recounting is very simple. The preclear is merely told to go
back to the beginning and to tell it all over again. He does this many
times. As he does it the engram should lift in tone on each recounting. It
may lose some of its data and gain other. If the Preclear is recounting in
the same words time after time, it is certain that he is playing a memory
record of what he has told you before. He must then be sent immediately
back to the actual engram and the somatics of it restimulated. He will then
be found to somewhat vary his story. He must be returned to the
consciousness of somatics continually until these are fully developed,
begin to lighten and are then gone.' This of course totally invalidates the
use of a completely rote system and requires an understanding of what is
happening to the Pc, bank, etc.
"Needless to say, this Interne went through many changes, now feels in
comm with his Pcs and not 'stuck' to some rote procedure which truly
inhibits the real gains to be gotten from Dianetics Engram Running. As
evidence to this action and its resultant gains in the Interne's ability to
audit, the following is a brief description of a case he audited today
applying 1963 engram running and Original Thesis to these cases.
"Case has run many hours of Dianetics with a hidden standard to do with
his hand. Has been trying since earliest Dianetic sessions to get this
handled. The somatic had been addressed by many different wordings and many
chains but had never blown, yet chains had apparently gone to EP. The
Auditor was C/Sed to find the actual somatic and run it out. It was found
in session that the somatic had been run out to 'EP' so an L3B was done.
From the L3B the Auditor found it was one incident in restim and proceeded
to flatten the somatic chain connected with it. During this the Auditor on
occasion had to correct three dates and two durations, but the spectacular
part was Pc began on Steps 9 and D to say the same thing regarding incident
each time. This being indicative of Pc running a memory record, Auditor
moves Pc to the actual Engram, somatics intensify and then blow (for the
first time), Pc exterior with VVGIs. Exam result is quite spectacular.
"All the above serves to once again validate the results of the
Dianetics materials when they are applied in full."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.nt.ts
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1971R
Remimeo
Dn Chkshts REVISED 28 JANUARY 1974
Ext Chkshts
Class IV (Changes in this type style)
Class VI
Class VII I M P O R T A N T
Class IX
L3RC
DIANETICS AND EXT RD REPAIR LIST
(Revises L3B)
This list includes the most frequent Dianetic errors. Use up to
Question 28 as the usual use. Then if the situation does not solve, use the
rest of the list.
A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a
chain of incidents.
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as
it can have different or several errors.
REMEMBER THAT YOUR PC MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY TRAINED TO UNDERSTAND ALL
THESE QUESTIONS: IF ONE READS AND HE SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR
IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it and take it as it read on a misunderstood
not on a fact).
RUNNING PCS ON DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN C/S 1
INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION.
TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY INDICATION OR FULL REPAIR OF IT.
1. The Item or symptom being run had no charge on it. __________
Indicate it was a false read, spot when it was run, where it was
run and get an F/N.
2. The same incident or pictures were run before. __________
Indicate that an overrun has occurred. If no F/N spot when,
spot where and get an F/N.
3. A session was started on a new item while an old one was not
erased. __________
TA would have been high on an old item or the Interiorization
Rundown and the auditor went on anyway with a new item.
Find what the old item was and repair it with a new assessment
on the earlier chain. Indicate fact to the pc.
4. The item being run described just one incident. (Narrative Item.)
__________
Find the somatics, emotions, attitudes of the incident and run
them as chains as per Standard Dianetics.
5. The incident had an earlier beginning. __________
Move the pc to the earlier beginning and proceed as per
Standard Dianetics R3R.
5a. There was an earlier misrun incident restimulated. __________
This would be an incident that was never resolved (erased) and
to handle it: Find out what it was and do an L3RC on it
6. There were earlier incidents stirred up and not erased. __________
Find what chain or item and run it to completion by R3R. This
condition sometimes leaves pc with the ARC Brk effect of
by-passed charge and is a basic example of by-passed charge.
7. Stirred up earlier unrun incidents. (Same as 6.) __________
8. When running one item went into another instead and ran a
different set of pictures. __________
Jumped chain.
9. When you said it was erased it still had a mass. __________
Auditor does ABCD again on the item one or two more times to
get BD F/N. If TA goes up ask for earlier beginning or earlier
similar on same incident to F/N.
10. You were protesting. __________
Find out what was being protested and handle it.
11. You were still taking drugs or medicine that had not worn off.
__________
12. You had a misunderstood on the commands. __________
Clear them up.
13. You had a misunderstood on what you were supposed to be
doing. __________
Clear it up, get it done right.
14. A wrong item was given. __________
This could also be a listing error. If not sure what it is, shift to
L4BR. Otherwise find it and indicate it as a wrong item and
that all other actions connected with it were wrong. You can
also date the session in which it occurred. And you can also find
earlier similar wrong items.
15. Has an earlier Dianetic upset been restimulated? __________
Find the earlier one and straighten it out. Also it can go back 2
or 3 more earlier mix-ups. Straighten out as you go back. Then
always check for "any earlier Dianetic upset" if you get no F/N.
16. There was an Incorrect date. __________
Correct it.
17. There was an Incorrect duration. __________
Correct it.
18. There was a false date. __________
Find the real date despite the false date in the incident.
19. There was a false duration. __________
Find the real duration despite the false duration in the incident.
20. Is there a stuck picture? __________
Do 1-19 again on the picture and handle.
21. Is there a persistent mass? __________
(Handle as in 24.)
22. Was this or an earlier action unnecessary? __________
23. Was there nothing wrong in the first place? __________
24. Did you have trouble with a pressure item or with pressure on
an item? __________
Date it exactly by meter and find out where it occurred in the
universe. If done exactly right, it will blow up and vanish and
F/N. If this doesn't work, do this list 1 down to 24 on it and
correct it to F/N.
25. Did you move out of your head earlier in auditing? __________
Do Ext RD. (Ref. HCO B 16 Dec 71, C/S Series 35R.)
26. Was your Exteriorization Rundown messed up? __________
Check folder on each flow and on the 2wc next day to be sure
each flow was run to erasure and the 2wc to F/N. Remember
that an auditor report can be a false report, and if you can't
find the error in the folder, then do 1 to 24 on each flow. DO
NOT AUDIT A PC FURTHER UNTIL THE EXT RD IS
TOTALLY CORRECTED. IF YOU DO THE TA WILL RISE,
WON'T COME DOWN AND PC WILL BE UPSET OR ILL.
IN CHOOSING WHICH OF THESE READING ITEMS TO HANDLE, ALWAYS HANDLE EXT
RD ITEMS FIRST. THEN HANDLE THE REST.
DO NOT CONTINUE AUDITING A PC WHOSE EXT RD WAS MESSED UP AND NOT
CORRECTED.
ANY ERROR REMAINING ON AN EXT RD IS DEADLY.
27. Were you being asked things you couldn't answer? __________
28. Did the auditor refuse to accept what you were saying? __________
Get this and earlier similar instances until you get an F/N VGIs.
FROM HERE ON ASSESS FURTHER ONLY IF PC TA OR UPSET REMAIN UNHANDLED.
IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING READ, INDICATE IT, GET AN F/N OR GET AN EARLIER
SIMILAR UNTIL IT F/Ns.
29. Has an item read under protest? __________
30. Was there no interest in running item? __________
31. Was there no charge on item in the first place? __________
32. Has an item been misworded? __________
33. Were you more interested in running another item? __________
34. Was the item suppressed? __________
35. Was the item invalidated? __________
36. Was more than you could see demanded? __________
37. Were 2 or more engrams found on the same date? __________
38. Did you skid into another incident? __________
39. Did you move to another chain? __________
40. Did you change the item while running it? __________
41. Were you running an item different from that assessed? __________
42. Was an Implant restimulated? __________
43. Were earlier errors on engrams restimulated? __________
44. Was important data by-passed? __________
45. Was an incident skipped? __________
46. Did 2 or more incidents get confused? __________
47. Has a withhold been missed? __________
48. Has an incident been left too heavily charged? __________
49. Has a chain been abandoned? __________
50. Has an incident been abandoned? __________
51. Were you prevented from running an incident? __________
52. Were processes changed on you? __________
53. Has basic on a chain been by-passed? __________
54. Has an erasure been denied you? __________
55. After it was erased did you have to put it back to erase it?
__________
56. Were you running copies of the original after it had gone?
__________
57. Have you gone past erasure into another chain? __________
58. Have several different chains been pulled in? __________
59. Has a cognition been chopped? __________
60. Has an F/N been indicated too soon? __________
61. Has the somatic gone but picture still there? __________
62. Should a basic be run through one more time? __________
63. Have you been held up by the auditor? __________
64. Were you distracted in session? __________
65.+ Did you go exterior in an incident? __________
66. Was an incident overrun? __________
67.+ Did you go exterior in session? __________
68.* Have you not wanted to go earlier than this life? __________
69. Has it been all black? __________
70. Was it all invisible? __________
71. Was the incident really a false or implanted occurrence?
__________
72.* Have you had constantly changing pictures? __________
73. Have you never had any pictures? __________
74. Are you having to put it there to run it? __________
Get Earlier Similar times to F/N VGIs.
75. Are incidents being overrun? __________
76. Has some major auditing action been done twice? __________
77. Has there been an unnecessary action? __________
78. Was there nothing wrong in the first place? __________
79. Was the real reason missed? __________
80. Was something else wrong? __________
(Do a Green Form.)
NOTE:
+ If questions 65 or 67 read and the pc has not had Interiorization
Rundown and the associated 2-way comm, the auditor ends off and sends
folder to C/S so it can be C/Sed for Ext RD.
* If questions 68 or 72 read, after indicating BPC, the auditor would
end off and return folder to C/S.
WARNING:
Do not use any Prepcheck-type buttons during engram running or add
overts to this list as they will "mush" engrams.
LRH:ams.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1974R
REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn
Spclsts
M7/4 *rate
Clay Demo
THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973!
THE INTROSPECTION RD
(Changes HCO B 23 Jan 1974,
"The Introspection RD".)
I have made a technical breakthrough which possibly ranks with the
major discoveries of the Twentieth Century. It is certainly the greatest
advancement of 1973 and is now being released after a final wrap-up of
research. It is called the Introspection Rundown.
The purpose of the Introspection RD is to locate and correct those
things which cause a person to fixate his attention inwardly, on himself or
his bank. This RD extroverts the person so that he can see his environment
and therefore handle and control it.
RESEARCH
In 1970 the actual cause of PSYCHOSIS was isolated (as given in HCO B
C/S Series 22, "Psychosis", 28 November 1970). In the ensuing years this
has been proven beyond doubt to be totally correct.
But what is a psychotic break?
Man has never been able to solve the psychotic break. In fact, human
beings are actually afraid of a person in a psychotic break and in
desperation turn to psychiatry to handle.
Psychiatry, desperate in its turn, without effective tech, resorts to
barbarities such as heavy drugs, ice picks, electric and insulin shock
which half kill the person and only suppress him. The fact remains there
has never been a cure for the psychotic break until now.
The key is WHAT CAUSED THE PERSON TO INTROSPECT BEFORE THE PSYCHOTIC
BREAK.
The breakthrough was made on a person who, after a series of wrong
indications, went into a full-blown psychotic break-violence, destruction
and all.
The psychiatrist at this point would have sharpened up his ice pick,
filled his syringes with the most powerful (and deadly) drugs he could find
and turned up the volts. His "handling" would have been a final destruction
of the individual.
What was done was an auditor went into the room, sat the person down
and corrected the last severe point of wrong indication. Subsequent times
of wrong indication in his life were cleared up, the person came out of the
psychotic break and into p.t.
THIS MEANS THE LAST REASON TO HAVE PSYCHIATRY AROUND IS GONE.
The psychotic break, the last of the "unsolvable" conditions that can
trap a person, has been solved.
And it's quite simple, really.
THEORY
Def. INTROSPECTlON: "(L. from introspicere, to look within) a looking
into one's own mind, feelings, reactions, etc.; observation and analysis of
oneself." Webster's New World Dictionary.
Def. INTROVERSION: "(from intro- + L. vertere, to turn) 2.... a
tendency to direct one's interest upon oneself rather than upon external
objects or events." Webster's New World Dictionary.
The essence of the Introspection RD is looking for and correcting all
those things which CAUSED the person to look inward worriedly and wrestle
with the mystery of some incorrectly designated error. The result is
continual inward looking or self auditing without relief or end.
In a normal person this becomes a diminished activity, unhappiness or
illness. In an R/Ser this becomes insanity and a psychotic break occurs at
the last severe point of wrong indication.
The pc who originates to the Examiner about his case or writes notes to
the C/S or auditor is introverted and should have this RD.
AUDITOR TRAINING
Auditors selected to do this RD must have recently done a HARD TRs
Course and the Anti-Q&A materials.
They must be able to recognize a ROCK SLAM, which is a particular E-
Meter phenomenon. They must be Class IV Expanded Dianetics auditors of
proven skill on routine cases. They must not themselves be R/Sers. (The
last requisite is waived in a self salvage co-audit group where all R/S.)
They need flawless TRs, no Q&A. This Rundown is very simple but cannot
be flubbed, as that -will compound the errors and cause further
introspection in the pc. It is better not to deliver this RD than to flub
any part of it. C/Ses take note. It is an Ethics Offense to attempt this
Rundown without the auditor having done the prerequisite training and a
further offense for an auditor to flub on it.
* * *
STEPS OF THE RD
(Steps O and 00 are for a person
in a psychotic break, not a
normal person.)
Put this checklist on inside front cover of folder as a pgm.
O. On a person in a psychotic break isolate the person wholly with
all attendants completely muzzled (no speech). _________
00. Give Vitamins (B Complex, including niacinamide) and minerals
(calcium and magnesium) to build the person up. _________
1. Locate by study or research of the person's case or via associates
or 2 way comm the last severe point of introversion just prior
to the current psychotic break or illness. There may be several
severe points of introversion, prior or subsequent to the one
that triggered the break or illness. These points are identified by
their upsetting or worrisome effect on the pc. Each is noted down
for handling. _________
2. On each point, indicate the substance of it as a point of
introversion
to release the By-Passed Charge. Each should BD and F/N. First
point indicated to F/N. _________
2B. Second point indicated to F/N. _________
2C. Third point indicated to F/N.
In the case of an out-list, the fact of a wrong item would be
indicated and the list corrected by the Laws of L&N. _________
3. Get the wording of each point stated by the pc as an item (i.e.
"What would you call such an incident?") and its read and
handle by 2wc each flow E/Sim to F/N. First point 2wc'd
F-1230 to F/N. _________
3A. Second point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _________
3B. Third point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _________
4. Verify/Correct all L&N lists. _________
5. Verify/Correct all Why "lists", PTS Interviews, 3 May PLs per
C/S Series 78. _________
6. R3R Quad item found in No. 3.
("Locate an incident where_____.") _________
6A. L&N for the Intention behind the subject in No. 3. Verify Q for
read before listing. _________
6B. R3R Quad the Intention. _________
6C. R3R Quad, L&N Intention & R3R Quad any other items found
(No. 3A, 3B, etc). _________
7. Clear the words "Introversion", "Introspection", "Extroversion".
_________
8. ARC BREAKS HANDLING. _________
8A. 2wc Has another ARC Broken you?
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _________
8B. 2wc Have you ARC Broken another?
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _________
8C. 2wc Have others ARC Broken anyone else?
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _________
8D. 2wc Have you ARC Broken yourself?
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _________
8E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had an ARC Break
when you didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC
Break when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC
Break when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8H. 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had an ARC
Break when you didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
81. R3R Quad the item. _________
8J. L&N for the Intention behind "the forcing of upsets on people
who don't have them." _________
8K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 8J. _________
9. WITHHOLDS HANDLING. _________
9A. 2wc Are you withholding something from anyone? E/Sim to
F/N. _________
9B. 2wc Is anyone else withholding something from you? E/Sim
to F/N. _________
9C. 2wc Are others withholding something from anyone else?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
9D. 2wc Are you withholding something from yourself? E/Sim to
F/N. _________
9E. 2wc Has anyone demanded W/Hs you didn't have? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
9F. 2wc Have you demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't
have? E/Sim to F/N. _________
9G. 2wc Have others demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't
have? E/Sim to F/N. _________
9H. 2wc Have you demanded W/Hs from yourself that you didn't
have? E/Sim to F/N. _________
9I. R3R Quad "demanded non-existent W/Hs from ." _________
9J. L&N, Clear Q thoroughly and verify for read first, what purpose
would be behind "the demanding of non-existent W/Hs from others"?
_________
9K. R3R Quad the item in No. 9J. _________
10. PROBLEMS HANDLING. _________
10A 2wc Has another given you a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10B 2wc Have you given another a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10C 2wc Have others given a problem to anyone else? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
10D. 2wc Have you given yourself a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had a problem when you
didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had a problem when
he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had a problem
when he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10H 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had a problem when
you didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10I R3R Quad the item. _________
10J L&N for the Intention behind "the giving of problems to people
that don't belong to them." _________
10K R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 10J. _________
11. OVERTS HANDLING. _________
11A 2wc Has anyone else committed overts on you? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
11B 2wc Have you committed overts on anyone else? Get what,
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11C 2wc Have others committed overts on anyone else? E/Sim to
F/N. _________
11D 2wc Have you committed any overts on yourself? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
11L 2wc Has anyone ever accused you of something you didn't do?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11F 2wc Have you ever accused anyone else of something he didn't
do? E/Sim to F/N. _________
11G 2wc Have others ever accused anyone else of something he
didn't do? E/Sim to F/N. _________
11H 2wc Have you ever accused yourself of something you didn't do?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11I R3R Quad the item. _________
11J L&N for the Intention behind "the accusing of someone of non-
existent overts." _________
11K R3 R Quad the Intention, in No. 11J. _________
12 NOT SAYING. _________
12A 2wc Are you not saying something about someone else or
something? Get what, E/Sim to F/N. _________
12B 2wc Is anyone not saying something about you? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12C 2wc Are others not saying something about anyone else? E/Sim
to F/N. _________
12D 2wc Are you not saying something about yourself? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12E 2wc Has anyone not accepted your W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _________
12F 2wc Have you not accepted someone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12G 2wc Have others not accepted anyone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12H 2wc Have you not accepted your own W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _________
12I R3R Quad "W/Hs weren't accepted." _________
12J L&N Intention behind "the rejecting of others' W/Hs." _________
12K R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 12J. _________
13. FALSE INCIDENTS HANDLING. _________
13A. 2wc Has anyone ever asked you for things that didn't exist?
E/S to F/N. _________
13B. 2wc Have you ever asked anyone else for things that didn't
exist? E/S to F/N. _________
13C 2wc Have others ever asked anyone else for things that didn't
exist? E/S to F/N. _________
13D 2wc Have you ever asked yourself for things that didn't exist?
E/S to F/N. _________
13E R3R Quad the item. _________
13F L&N for the Intention behind "the demanding of false incidents
from others." _________
13G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 13F. _________
14 PTS HANDLING. _________
14A 2wc Has anyone given you a false assignment that you were
being done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14B 2wc Have you given anyone a false assignment that he was being
done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14C 2wc Have others given anyone else a false assignment that they
were being done in? E/Sim to F/N. _________
14D 2wc Have you given yourself a false assignment that you were
being done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14E R3R Quad the item. _________
14F L&N for the Intention behind "giving others a false assignment
that they were being done in." _________
14G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 14F. _________
14H 2wc Has anyone been doing you in? E/S to F/N. _________
14I 2wc Have you been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _________
14J 2wc Have others been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _________
14K 2wc Have you been doing yourself in? E/S to F/N. _________
15 FALSE INTERROGATION HANDLING. _________
15A 2wc Has anyone ever interrogated you for no reason? E/S to
F/N. _________
15B 2wc Have you ever interrogated anyone else for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
15C 2wc Have others ever interrogated anyone else for no reason?
E/S to F/N. _________
15D 2wc Have you ever had yourself interrogated for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
15E R3R Quad the item. _________
15F L&N for the Intention behind "the false interrogating of others."
_________
15G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 15F. _________
16 FALSE INVALIDATION HANDLING. _________
16A 2wc Has anyone ever heavily invalidated you unjustly? E/S to
F/N. _________
16B 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly?
E/S to F/N. _________
16C 2wc Have others ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly?
E/S to F/N. _________
16D 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated yourself unjustly? E/S
to F/N. _________
16E R3R Quad the item. _________
16F L&N for the Intention behind "the unjust invalidating of others."
_________
16G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 16F. _________
17 FALSE VALIDATION HANDLING. _________
17A 2wc Has another ever validated you for something he knew was
wrong? E/S to F/N. _________
17B 2wc Have you ever validated anyone else for something you
knew was wrong? E/S to F/N. _________
17C 2wc Have others ever validated anyone else for something they
knew was wrong? E/S to F/N. _________
17D 2wc Have you ever validated yourself for something you knew
was wrong? E/S to F/N. _________
17E R3R Quad the item. _________
17F L&N for the Intention behind "the false validating of others."
_________
17G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 17F. _________
18. "HIT" FOR NO REASON. _________
18A. 2wc Has anyone "hit" you too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N.
_________
18B 2wc Have you "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
18C 2wc Have others "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
18D 2wc Have you gotten yourself "hit" too hard for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
18E R3R Quad the item. _________
18F L&N for the Intention behind "the 'hitting' of others unfairly."
_________
18G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 18F. _________
19 INVALIDATED BEINGNESS HANDLING. _________
19A 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned who you were?
E/S to F/N. _________
19B 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's
identity? E/S to F/N. _________
19C 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's
identity? E/S to F/N. _________
19D 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your identity? E/S
to F/N. _________
19E R3R Quad the item. _________
19F L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of others' identity."
_________
19G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 19F. _________
20. INVALIDATED INTENTIONS HANDLING. _________
20A 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned your intentions?
E/S to F/N. _________
20B 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's
intentions? E/S to F/N. _________
20C 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's
intentions? E/S to F/N. _________
20D 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your own intentions?
E/S to F/N. _________
20E R3R Quad "misinterpreted intentions. " _________
20F L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of the intentions of
others." _________
20G R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 20F. _________
21 OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS. _________
An HC List could be added here if the pc's "think" is still weird.
NOTE: ITEMS THAT DON'T READ WON'T RUN. DON'T RUN OR LIST Q's THAT DON'T
READ OR YOU'LL REINTROVERT THE PC.
Frequent D of P Interview is vital whenever the case looks like it is
not rapidly progressing. Also a quick assessment may be needed as a
separate action to isolate possible charged areas of introspection.
At any time after Step 2, Objective Havingness should be done at
session end. If one of the items in Steps 3-20 turns out to be false the pc
will introvert further. In such a case indicate the fact of it having been
unnecessary and get an F/N. Then run Objective Havingness. If the TA goes
high (or low) and won't come into range, assess a C/S 53RF and handle.
In the case of a pc in a psychotic break, the C/S would have to locate
the last severe wrong indication, indicate the fact to the pc and get it
corrected (as with a wrong item) as the first action.
EXTROVERSION
Def. EXTROVERSION: ". . . Means nothing more than being able to look
outward...." "An extroverted personality is one who is capable of looking
around the environment ...." "A person who is capable of looking at the
world around him and seeing it quite real and quite bright is of course in
a state of extroversion." (Problems Of Work.)
The end phenomena of the Introspection RD is the person extroverted, no
longer looking inward worriedly in a continuous self-audit without end.
The EP on a person in a psychotic break is the end of the psychotic
break.
The RD is very simple and its results are magical in effectiveness.
Flubs can wreck it so don't permit them.
You have in your hands the tool to take over mental therapy in full.
You need not fear the insane or the psychotic break any longer.
Here also is the cure for the continual self-auditing pc who is dug
into his bank. It works on all pcs in fact with rave results.
Do it flawlessly and we all win.
THIS PLANET IS OURS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.Jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Added to by HCO Bs 20 Feb 74, 6 Mar 74 and 20 Apr
74.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1974
(Amended & Reissued 28 March 74
-only change is Series No.)
Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Series 20
SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY
AND EXPANDED DIANETICS
As a re-study of Service Facsimiles the following theory is released as
background.
Note that this is background data for Class IV but is in actual
practice used on Expanded Dianetics.
This sheds some light on Evil Purposes.
And a new approach comes to light for use in Expanded Dianetics.
NONE OF THIS ALTERS CLASS IV and NONE OF IT CANCELS OR CHANGES CLASS IV
OR EARLIER DATA.
AN OUTLINED NEW XDN RD
Service Facs By Dynamics and sections thereof.
How to be right on the_____Dynamic Triple. (The exact Question needs to
be worked out for various pcs.)
All L&N and therefore very dicey.
The theory is that a thetan even when pressed or suppressed to the
absolute limit of near extinction will still try, even when "cooperating",
to some way be right.
A thetan cannot die. His only out is to try to stop something as he
himself cannot stop living.
This gives rise to fixed ideas as he is trying to stop-therefore the
ideas hold in time and continue.
His efforts to be right continue to stop him in a reverse flow.
This is true because he is already at near total effect. He also
becomes the effect of his own fixed idea efforts to handle.
Just as a man being crushed by a house-size rock will still put his
hands out to fend it off, so will a thetan continue to fend off his
believed oppressions by stopping them.
Insistence on rightness is a last refuge of beingness. Thus one gets
some very aberrated ones.
These he uses in situations where he thinks he might be found wrong.
These are called "Service Facsimiles". "Service" because they "serve" him.
"Facsimiles" because they are in mental image picture form. They explain
his disabilities as well.
The facsimile part is actually a self-installed disability that
"explains" how he is not responsible for not being able to cope. So he is
not wrong for not coping.
Part of the "package" is to be right by making wrong.
The service facsimile is therefore a picture containing an explanation
of self condition and also a fixed method of making others wrong.
A real handling would have to include:
A. What disability he uses to explain how he is not
responsible for not fully coping with life or given situations.
B. A fixed postulate he uses to further assert that in actual
fact he is still right.
C. The computation as contained in B to make others wrong so
as to be right.
Handling therefore would include:
a. The disability R3 R Triple.
b. L&N for a fixed postulate on each dynamic he uses to be
right.
c. A realization he is using this to make others wrong so he
can be right.
All these conditions would have to be handled to fully handle a Service
Fac to full EP.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.ntm jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 FEBRUARY 1974
Remimeo
C/S Series 91
MUTUAL OUT RUDS
It has been known for many many years that the phenomenon of "Mutual
Out Ruds" existed.
This means TWO OR MORE PEOPLE WHO MUTUALLY HAVE RUDS OUT ON THE WIDER
GROUP OR OTHER DYNAMICS AND DO NOT GET THEM IN.
Example: A husband-wife co-audit team never run O/Ws on the rest of the
family because both of them have similar overts and so consider it usual.
Example: Prisoners engaged in co-auditing (as in Narconon) may have
similar overts, withholds, ARC Brks and/or problems with the rest of
society and so do not think of handling them as out-ruds.
Example: Two top class auditors co-auditing, have similar overts on the
junior auditors and the org and so never think to get them in.
THIS CAN STALL CASES!
A C/S has to take this factor into account wherever he has a
possibility of its occurring.
In one instance mutual out ruds went so far as four auditors, co-
auditing, agreeing never to put their overts down on W/Ses "so they would
not lose reputation". Needless to say all four eventually blew.
If the C/S had done a routine check for mutual out ruds, this whole
scene would have been prevented and four beings would not have ruined each
other.
IN ANY SITUATION WHERE A SMALL PORTION OF A LARGER GROUP IS ENGAGED IN
CO-AUDIT THE C/S MUST CHECK ROUTINELY FOR MUTUAL OUT RUDS.
This could even apply to an org or vessel which was separate from the
rest of society around it: its members could develop mutual out ruds from
the rest of society and cases could fail on this point.
Be alert to MUTUAL OUT RUD SITUATIONS AND HANDLE BY GETTING THEM IN ON
THE REST OF THE SURROUNDING PEOPLE OR SOCIETY.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 FEBRUARY 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn Spclsts
M 7/4 * Rate
Clay Demo
INTROSPECTION RD
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS
RESPONSIBILITY STEP
An additional step to the rundown has been found necessary, especially
in the case of a psychotic. This is the Responsibility Step. It consists of
doing ARC Brks LD Triple, 2wc Recent Actions taking up the best reading
overt and running Responsibility on it (i.e. What about_____could you be
responsible for?). If no major increase in responsibility take up another
reading overt and run Responsibility on that. Do this until there is a
significant increase in responsibility. Follow this with running all E.
Purps brought up during the Introspection steps of the RD. If the pc was
found to R/S during the RD the C/S would order the R/Sing statements culled
and assessed and those with good reads handled by L&N "What intention is
connected with (statement)?" then R3R Quad. Additionally the C/S would note
areas of low responsibility and order O/W run on those areas.
PROGRAMMING DATA
In the case of a psycho it is necessary to tailor the Introspection RD
steps to the pc, instead of following it as a rote sequence at the risk of
running unreading items on the pc. On any pc this is deadly. In a psycho it
is pure dynamite.
To do this the C/S would order the subjects of the RD steps assessed,
then handled in order of large reads. The Auditor's TR- 1 and metering must
be such that he can make a meter read. The RD could be made to fail on this
point by missing hot subjects.
THE CLEARED CANNIBAL FACTOR
When you clear a cannibal what do you have? Experientially you have a
cannibal. His experiential track is such that he's been a cannibal for
ages. That's how he's handled life and people around him, that's what he
knows how to do. This person is unaware of his responsibilities to other
dynamics and is unfamiliar with proper behavior and responsible actions
towards others. In the case of an SP, he has been busy destroying others
for so long that when he's somewhat cleaned up on this he does not know
what else to do or how to act. It's rather pathetic, actually.
ISOLATION
In a person in a psychotic break, it is necessary to isolate them for
them to destimulate and to protect them and others from possible damage.
While in isolation the person receives the Introspection RD done flawlessly
on a short-session basis, gradiently winning and gaining confidence.
Between sessions the muzzled rule is in force. No one speaks to the person
or in his hearing.
There comes a point where the C/S must decide to release the person from
isolation. To do this the C/S must know that the person can take
responsibility for his actions as regards others, as well as toward
himself.
C/S ACTION-
CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP
The C/S's action is a direct comm line to the person by notes. The
person is provided with paper and pen to reply. The C/S must determine the
person's responsibility level. Example: "Dear Joe. What can you guarantee
me if you are let out of isolation?" If the person's reply shows continued
irresponsibility toward other dynamics or fixation on one dynamic to the
exclusion of others damaged the C/S must inform the person of his continued
isolation and why. Example: "Dear Joe. I'm sorry but no go on coming out of
isolation yet. Your actions threatened the survival of hundreds of people
indirectly and 6 families directly by burning down their houses. You are
unaware of the effects this could have had and still only concerned about
your own welfare. You must hate the human race quite a bit."
The C/S has drawn a conclusion based on the information he has and lets
the person know where he stands. He does not reintrovert the pc by asking
him, "Why did you burn down those houses?" He draws an accurate conclusion
and indicates it.
This will elicit a protest from the person and bring about an
involvement in the dynamics concerned. It also serves to bring about an
awareness of consequences. Example: "But. . . but. . . I never meant to
threaten others' survival. I just wanted to burn down the houses because I
like fires. Gosh. . . I didn't mean it. I don't hate the human race. . .
Oh! I really don't hate the human race." Cognition.
The person's auditing is continued between these exchanges. The Auditor
may have to clean up some ARC Breaks as the protest is coming off.
Skillfully done, that's all the Auditor should have to clean up, except
maybe some more O/Ws. When it is obvious the person is out of his psychosis
and up to the responsibility of living with others his isolation is ended.
SUMMARY
Handling the C/Sing and auditing on this RD requires a real
understanding of Dianetics and Expanded Dianetics basics and the utmost
precision of application. Its results are nothing short of miraculous. I
hope this will be of further assistance to you.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH :ntm jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn Spclsts
M 7/4 * Rate
Clay Demo
INTROSPECTION RD
SECOND ADDITION
INFORMATION TO C/SES
FIXATED ATTENTION
Ref. Creation of Human Ability
R2-39 and R2-23
Sometimes the C/S runs into the case whose attention is solidly fixed
on something. When attention is fixed we have an unawareness of other
things than the object of fixation and a lessening of Self-Determinism to a
point of Other Determinism. Example: The pc is always bringing up cars. He
has trouble with cars, has ARC Breaks about cars, W/Hs about cars, commits
overts on cars. It worries him all the time, is a constant problem.
The fixated attention case appears not to as-is and is usually stuck on
the track in the "quiet" portion of an incident. Ahead of it and behind it
is extreme randomity. This is not easily confronted so is not-ised. The
solution is to get the pc to exercise his attention putting it here and
there.
INTROVERSION AND ATTENTION
The pc whose attention is fixated manifests it in several ways. He will
be continuously introverted on the area, will bring it up often in session
but it doesn't seem to blow. It also shows up in correspondence to the C/S,
frequent originations at Examiner, a fixed vague stare, all evidence of
introversion. The pc may not originate it.
ANATOMY AND REMEDY
This fixation shows up as a problem but it is usually a Hidden
Standard, a special problem the pc thinks must be resolved before auditing
can be seen to have worked. Hence the NCG (no case gain) aspect. It is
always an old problem of long duration.
The remedy basically involves getting the terminal connected with the
area of fixation located and having the pc put his attention on the
terminal and take his attention off the terminal.
THE PROCESS
STEP 1-Determine exactly what the pc has attention fixed on, by folder
inspection or 2wc for a BD F/N item.
STEP 2-Get the area translated into a terminal. This will read well and
have a high degree of pc interest.
STEP 3-Fit the terminal in the commands: "Put your attention on terminal."
"Take your attention off terminal." Clear and run it alternate repetitive
to the EP of pc's attention no longer fixed on the. area, F/N Cog VGIs.
This is called Attention Subjective Repetitive.
STEP 4-Select two objects. Best are a red pen and a blue pen. Two bowling
pins will also do. Place them three to four feet apart at a distance of
three to four feet from the pc. Place them on white paper for visibility.
STEP 5-Name the objects and fit them in the commands: "Put your attention
on the red pen." "Put your attention on the blue pen." Clear the commands
and run them alternate repetitive to the EP of pc in control of his
attention, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Objective Repetitive.
ALTERNATE STEP 5-Name the objects and fit them in the following commands:
"Decide to put your attention on the red pen. Tell me when you've done so."
"Put your attention on it." Then "Decide to put your attention on the blue
pen. Tell me when you've done so." "Put your attention on it." Run this
alternate repetitive until the pc is doing the decision step each time,
then you can drop out the "Tell me when you've done so." Run it to the EP
of pc in control of his attention, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention
Objective Decision Repetitive.
NOTE: With both these objective attention processes the pc may swear you
are hypnotizing him or something. The process actually runs out hypnotism.
The pc will come through a band of Robotism and come out the other end IN
CONTROL OF HIS OWN ATTENTION.
VITAL PROCESS DATA
It would never be okay to run Attention Subjective Repetitive on a
significance (a no mass thing). It must be run on a terminal. This is a ONE-
SHOT PROCESS, depending for its effectiveness on the correctness of the
first item selected.
This item is usually unmistakable in a truly fixated case.
PROGRAMMING
Attention Subjective and Objective Repetitive fits in sequence on the
Introspection RD between Steps 6C and 7.
If the terminal connected with the area of fixed attention could not
be located then the area could not be addressed with Attention Subjective
Repetitive, but in some other manner. It is unlikely that no terminal could
be found on a truly fixated attention case.
ISOLATION
When a person is released from isolation after terminated handling of a
psychotic break it is usual to welcome them back and restore any lost ARC
for them from the group, if needed, with an announcement in the OODs.
The person would be interviewed as to whether he wanted to stay or go
and what his intentions were.
Formal notification would be made that the person was back in good
graces and he would be allowed to make up for any damage done, but not
forced to do so. In the case of a crew member, it would be expected he
would be assigned to the DPF or RPF where there was one, and told to make
good.
ADDITIONAL
CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP
There is an additional tool for use by the C/S in raising the pc's
responsibility. The C/S sends to the pc HCO B 21 Jan AD10 "Justification"
with a note asking the pc to please read the HCO B then tell the C/S if it
has any application.
This would be done as the first of the series of C/S notes and pc replies
on the Cleared Cannibal Step.
If the C/S receives any "rant and rave" in reply he would order it
Dated and Located as the pc would be answering out of an incident.
Regardless, the Justification HCO B would have to be followed by O/Ws
as the pc has W/Hs there to be restimmed and not running out the O/Ws could
cause the TA to skyrocket.
C/SING ON PSYCHOS
C/Sing and auditing psychos is a very precise and even touchy business.
There must be no mistakes and you cannot be heavy-handed on them. They are
at the lowest point on the Effect Scale and therefore delicate at best and
easily overwhelmed.
It is also policy that a C/S takes it easy on auditors handling
psychos. They are very hard to audit and difficult to control. So don't
berate the auditor. If they get any kind of a result three cheers.
INTEGRITY
It has always been a rule that actions of one RD are not mixed in with
another action or used randomly outside of the RD.
Recently I found that a technique from the Introspection RD was used to
indicate by-passed charge or something when handling ruds. This is very
wrong. This happened in the field as an isolated instance but is worth
mentioning.
The integrity of any RD must be maintained or its effectiveness is
reduced. When parts of a RD are used at random by a C/S it actually starts
the pc on a RD that is left incomplete.
So don't extract bits of this RD and use them on other actions. You
would do yourself and the pc a disservice.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams jh
Copyright � 1974
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1971 RA
Remimeo (REVISED 28 JAN 1974)
DnChkshts (REVISED 8 MARCH 1974)
Int RD Chkshts
Class IV and
above. I M P O R T A N T
L3RD
DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR LIST
This list includes the most frequent Dianetic errors.
A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a
chain of incidents.
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as
it can have different or several errors.
REMEMBER TO CLEAR EACH WORD ON THIS LIST. IF A QUESTION READS AND THE
PC SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it
and take it as it read on a misunderstood not on a fact).
RUNNING PCS ON DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN C/S 1
INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION.
TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY FULL REPAIR OF IT PER THE INSTRUCTIONS.
1. There was an Earlier Similar incident. _________
Indicate it, flatten the chain.
2. There was no Earlier Similar incident. _________
Indicate it. Determine if the chain is flat or if the last incident
needs to be run through again. Complete the chain to F/N by
indication or D/L if needed, or by flattening it.
3. There was an earlier beginning. _________
Indicate it. Handle with R3R and complete the chain.
4. There was no earlier beginning. _________
Indicate it. Complete the chain with R3R ABCD on last incident
if unflat.
5. An F/N was indicated too soon. _________
Indicate it. Flatten the last incident.
6. An F/N was indicated too late. _________
Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if
necessary.
7. An F/N was not indicated at all. _________
Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if
necessary.
8. There was no charge on an item in the first place. _________
Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run, D/L if necessary.
9. Jumped chains. _________
Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain, spot flat point and
indicate
the overrun, D/L if necessary, or flatten the chain.
10. Flubbed commands. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
11. Didn't have a command. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
12. Misunderstood on the command. _________
Find it and clear it.
13. Incident should be run through one more time. _________
Indicate it. ABCD on the incident, flatten the chain.
14. Too late on the chain. _________
Indicate it. Get the Earlier Similar incident and complete the
chain with R3R.
15. Incident gone more solid. _________
Indicate it. Check for earlier incident or earlier beginning and
complete the chain.
16. Stopped running an incident that was erasing. _________
Indicate it. ABCD on the incident and erase it.
17. Went past basic on a chain. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary.
18. An earlier misrun incident restimulated. _________
Indicate it. Find out what it was and do an L-3RD on it.
19. Two or more incidents got confused. _________
Indicate it, sort it out with an L-3RD on it.
20. An implant was restimulated. _________
Indicate it, if no joy do an L-3RD on the time of the
restimulation.
21. The incident was really an implant. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary or L-3RD on it.
22. Wrong Item. _________
Indicate it was a wrong item and that all other actions
connected with it were wrong. If it is from an L&N list or if
any question or difficulty, L-4BR.
23. Not your item. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N.
24. Not your incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-3RD if any trouble.
25. Same thing run twice. _________
Indicate it. Spot the first flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L
if necessary.
26. There was a wrong date. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if
unflat.
27. There was no date for the incident. _________
Indicate it. Get the date and flatten the incident if unflat.
28. It was a false date. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat.
29. There was an incorrect duration. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if
unflat.
30. No duration was found for the incident. _________
Indicate it. Get the duration and flatten the incident if unflat.
31. There was a false duration. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if
unflat.
32. An earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated. _________
Locate what it was, indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD if
necessary.
33. An earlier ARC Break on engrams was restimulated. _________
Indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD, ARCU CDEINR or an
L-1C as applicable.
34. There was an ARC Break in the incident. _________
Indicate it. Flatten the incident if unflat. ARCU CDEINR at that
time if necessary.
35. You were protesting. _________
Indicate it, clean it up E/S to F/N.
36. Auditor demanded more than you could see. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary.
37. Auditor refused to accept what you were saying. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-1C if necessary.
38. You were prevented from running an incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if
necessary.
39. You were distracted while running an incident. _________
Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L-1C if
necessary.
40. Audited over an ARC Brk _________
Problem _________
Withhold. _________
Indicate it and handle the out rud. Do not pull W/Hs before the
engram or chain is repaired or it will mush engrams.
41. An item was suppressed. _________
Indicate it. Get the suppress off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten
the item.
42. An item was invalidated. _________
Indicate it. Get the inval off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the
item.
43. An item was abandoned. _________
Indicate it, get the item back and run or flatten it.
44. The wording of the item was changed. _________
Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Flatten it
if unflat.
45. Stuck picture. _________
Indicate it. Do an L3-RD on it. You can also unstick it by having
him recall a time before it and recall a time after it. D/L if
necessary.
46. All black. _________
Spot the black field or picture. Get the correct duration. If no go,
L-3RD on it.
47. Invisible. _________
Spot the invisible field or picture. L-3RD on it.
48. Constantly changing pictures. _________
Indicate there was a misassessment and a wrong item was
taken off the list. Get the correct item and run it, or L-3RD
on that session.
49. There was a persistent mass. _________
L-3RD on it, or D/L.
50. There was trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item.
_________
L-3RD on it, or D/L.
51. You went exterior. _________
Indicate it, D/L if necessary or rehab. If TA high as a result of
this do an Int RD Correction List or send to the C/S if pc hasn't
had Int RD.
52. Your Int RD was messed up. _________
Indicate it, Int RD Corr List if TA high. If TA OK, 2wc "going
into things" or clear up any misunderstoods on Int, Ext, etc.
53. Audited over Drugs or Medicine. _________
Indicate it. L-3RD on that time, then verify all chains to ensure
they erased.
54. A past death restimulated. _________
Indicate it, if it doesn't blow run it out.
55. There was nothing wrong in the first place. _________
Indicate it. Continue the action you were on.
56. The real reason was missed. _________
Indicate it. Locate the real reason and handle or do a GF.
57. Something else wrong. _________
Locate what it is and sort it out or do a GF M5 and handle.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.mh
Copyright � 1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Organization Executive Course Books
& The Management Series
by L. Ron Hubbard
The simultaneous release by L. Ron Hubbard of the eight volumes of the
Organization Executive Course and the additional volume of the Management
Series may well go down as a landmark in the still unwritten history of our
age.
Earlier, this vast body of material had been available only to Scientology
staff members. But in December 1973 L. Ron Hubbard lifted any restrictions
on the general sale of these books.
These materials cover L. Ron Hubbard's comprehensive research and
application in the field of personal and group organization, revealing the
basic laws and principles which determine the survival of any activity or
undertaking.
This body of data ranks in importance with Scientology's auditing
technology which L. Ron Hubbard also researched and developed.
These writings were originally published as HCO Policy Letters for the
guidance of Scientology staff members. Their application by Scientology
staff has enabled Scientology to expand at a phenomenal rate and become
recognized as the fastest growing religion on the planet.
The enormous publishing task of collecting these writings by L. Ron Hubbard
(issued mainly as Policy Letters from 1950 to 1969, with some later
materials) and publishing them as volumes was begun in 1969. In 1970 Volume
O was published and in the succeeding years the remaining volumes were
issued. In addition to the Basic Staff Volume, there is a volume for each
division of the seven division Organizing Board. The final volume, the
Executive Division Volume, was issued in March 1974, followed by
simultaneous publishing in the United States of all volumes. There will
also be supplementary volumes issued to follow L. Ron Hubbard's ever
continuing developments in the technology of organizing and producing.
Eight hardbound large format volumes, 4,032 pages plus Management Series
544 pages. Separate 360 page Subject (title) Index. Available from your
nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct from the publishers:
Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V,
Denmark; or Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 2723 West
Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90026, U.S.A.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
TWC CHECKSHEETS
TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS
Two Way Comm is not an art. It is a science which has exact rules.
Foremost in the rules is:
DON'T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO WAY COMM.
By a "listing question" is meant any question which directly or
indirectly calls for items in the pc's answer.
Use of "who", "what", "which" instantly turns a TWC into a listing
question.
Listing questions are governed by the rules of Listing and Nulling.
If you use a listing question accidentally in TWC you can get the same
bad reactions from a pc that you would get on a wrongly done list.
The reason for pc upsets in TWC is hidden as it is not apparently a
listing process, rarely gets the correction a bad list would get.
Asking "who" or "what" or "which" during a TWC after the main question
can also turn it into a Listing and Nulling process.
TWC questions MUST be limited to feelings, reactions, significances.
They must NEVER ask for terminals or locations.
EXAMPLE: "Who upset you?" in TWC causes the pc to give items. This is a
LIST. "What are you upset about?" does the same thing. "Which town were you
happiest in?" is also a LISTING question NOT a TWC question. Any of these
results in the pc giving items. They are not then nulled or correctly
indicated. The pc can get VERY upset just as he would with a wrong list.
Yet the session is not a "listing session" so never gets corrected.
EXAMPLE: "How are you doing lately?" is an example of a correct TWC
question. It gets off charge and gets no list items. "Are you better these
days than you used to be?" "How have you been since the last session?"
"What happened" is different than "What illness", "What person", "What
town" which are listing questions.
REPAIR
When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc look into TWC
processes in the folder and treat them as L&N processes where the pc has
answered with items. The relief is magical.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ntm.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
E-METERS
SENSITIVITY ERRORS
An auditor must set the Sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly right for
each pc.
The setting is different for almost every pc.
TOO LOW
Too low a Sensitivity on some pcs (like Sens 5-32) will obscure reads
and make them look like ticks. It will obscure an F/N. Whereas a Sens 16-
128 will show reads and F/Ns.
A pc can be hindered by the auditor not setting the Sensitivity high
enough to show reads and F/Ns. Items are missed as well as F/Ns.
TOO HIGH
When auditing a flying pc or a Clear or OT the auditor who sets the
Sensitivity too high gets weird impressions of the case.
"Latent reads" on such a case are common. They aren't latent at all.
What happens is that the F/N is more than a dial wide at high Sensitivity
and a started F/N looks like a read as its sweep is stopped by the pin on
the right of the dial.
In this way uncharged items are taken up, the case is slowed, overrun
and general upsets requiring repairs occur.
On one hand electrode an OT VII sometimes has a 3h dial wide F/N at
Sens 5-32.
This would mean a 3/4 dial F/N at Sens 2-32 with two cans.
A Clear sometimes has a floating TA at Sens 32-32 instead of an F/N. He
would have to be run at Sens 3-32 two cans to keep him on a dial or detect
F/Ns.
This is a very important matter as the auditor will miss F/Ns, think
beginning F/Ns are reads and as the Pre-OT is off the dial, miss reads.
Thus uncharged areas are run and charged ones are missed.
The result is very chaotic to repair.
Some lower level pcs also have a need for lower Sensitivity settings.
SUMMARY
Sometimes an easy pc looks very difficult just because of wrong
Sensitivity settings.
Set the Sensitivity for the pc for a half dial F/N maximum or minimum.
Don't get repairs.
Get wins.
LRH:ntm.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
AO Auditors
Class VIII
END PHENOMENA
(Ref: HCO B 20 Feb 1970,
"Floating Needles and End Phenomena")
Different types of auditing call for different handlings of End
Phenomena.
End Phenomena will also vary depending on what you're running.
The definition of END PHENOMENA is "those indicators in the pc and
meter which show that a chain or process is ended". Misapplication of this
definition can result in underrun and overrun processes or actions and the
pc snarled up with BPC.
TYPES OF EPs
In Power Processing the auditor waits for a specific EP and does not
indicate an F/N until he has gotten the specific EP for the process. To
miss on this in Power is disastrous, thus Power auditors are drilled and
drilled on the handling of Power EPs.
In Dianetics, the EP of a chain is erasure, accompanied by an F/N,
cognition and good indicators. You wouldn't necessarily expect rave
indicators on a pc in the middle of an assist, under emotional or physical
stress until the full assist was completed though. What you would expect is
the chain blown with an F/N. Those two things themselves are good
indicators. The cognition could simply be "the chain blew".
In Scientology, End Phenomena vary with what you're auditing. An ARC
Broken pc on an L-1C will peel off charge and come uptone gradually as each
reading line is handled. Sometimes it comes in a spectacular huge cog and
VVGIs and dial F/N, but that's usually after charge has been taken off on a
gradient. What's expected is an F/N as that charge being handled moves off.
In Ruds it's the same idea. When you've got your F/N and that charge
has moved off, indicate it. Don't push the pc on and on for some "EP".
You've got it.
Now a major grade process will run to F/N, Cog, VGIs and release.
You'll have an ability regained. But that's a grade process on a set up
flying pc.
F/N ABUSE
Mistakenly applying the Power EP rule to Ruds will have the pc messed
up by overrun. It invalidates the pc's wins and keys the charge back in.
The pc will start thinking he hasn't blown the charge and can't do anything
about it.
In 1970 I had to write the HCO B "F/Ns and End Phenomena" to cure
auditors of chopping pc EPs on major actions by indicating F/Ns too soon.
This is one type of F/N abuse which has largely been handled.
That bulletin and Power EP handling have been in some instances
misapplied in the direction of overrun. "The pc isn't getting EP on these
chains as there's no cognition, just 'it erased'," is one example.
Obviously the C/S didn't understand the definition of cognition or what an
EP is. Another example is the pc spots what it is and F/Ns and the auditor
carries on, expecting an "EP".
OTs and EPs
An OT is particularly subject to F/N abuse as he can blow things quite
rapidly. If the auditor misses the F/N due to too high a sensitivity
setting or doesn't call it as he's waiting for an "EP", overrun occurs. It
invalidates an OT's ability to as-is and causes severe upsets.
This error can also stem from auditor speed. The auditor, used to
auditing lower level pcs or never trained to audit OTs, can't keep up with
the OT and misses his F/Ns or reads.
Thus overruns occur and charged areas are bypassed.
This could account for those cases who were flying then fell on their
heads with the same problems that blew back again.
REMEDY
The remedy of this problem begins with thoroughly clearing all terms
connected with EPs. This is basically Word Clearing Method 6, Key Words.
The next action is to get my HCO Bs on the subject of EPs and also
related metering HCO Bs fully understood and starrated. This would be
followed by clay demos of various EPs of processes and actions showing the
mechanics of the bank and what happens with the pc and meter.
TRs and meter drills on spotting F/Ns would follow, including any
needed obnosis drills and correction of meter position so that the auditor
could see the pc, meter and his admin at a glance.
Then, the auditor would be gradiently drilled on handling the pc, meter
and admin at increasing rates of speed including recognizing and indicating
EPs when they occurred. When the auditor could do all of this smoothly at
the high rate of speed of an OT blowing things by inspection without
fumbling, the last action would be bullbaited drills like TRs 103 and 104,
on a gradient to a level of competence whereby the auditor could handle
anything that came up at speed and do so smoothly.
Then you'd really have an OT auditor. And that's what you'll have to do
to make them.
SUMMARY
Overrun and underrun alike mess up cases.
Both stem from an auditor inability to recognize and handle different
types of EPs and inexpertness in handling the tools of auditing at speed.
Don't overrun pcs and have to repair them.
Let the pc have his wins.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1971 RA
REVISED 24 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
C/S Series 32RA
USE OF DIANETICS
(Revised per HCO B 15 July 1971, Issue I,
"Quads Cancelled"-Revisions in this type style.)
It is mandatory important urgent that one does not audit three flow
items until one has brought all earlier Dianetic Items into three flows.
TRIPLE
On a case where only Flow One (Single) has been run, you don't suddenly
run a Triple (F1, F2, F3) such as on the LX Class VIII lists until one has
run the earliest Dn item ever run (or that can be found) on Dn Triple and
then on forward on Triple up to the LX.
REASON
Auditing additional flows while earlier items remain Single
restimulates the missing flows and stacks them up as mass. They can make a
pc uncomfortable until run.
All the missing flows (that were not run) are still potential mass.
This mass restimulates like something too late on the chain when a flow
not run on earlier items is run on later items.
Auditing itself is a sort of time track. The earliest session blows the
later sessions.
FULL FLOW TABLE
Before running Triple Dianetics one makes a table of earlier items
run. Like this:
full Flow Table
Flow
Date Item Previously Run Must Run
2/3/62 Guf Shoulder F 1 F 2, 3
3/3/67 Gowin Foot F 1 F 2, 3
30/4/67 Chowin Chump F 1 F 2, 3
29/9/68 LX Anger F 1, 2, 3
LX Peeved F 1, 2, 3
4/10/69 Feeling Numb F 1, 2, 3
5/9/70 EXT RD F 1, 2, 3
9/10/70 Feeling of Goof F 1, 2, 3
10/10/71 Dn Assist on Head F 1 F 2, 3
FLOWS
F 1 is FLOW ONE, something happening to self.
F 2 is FLOW TWO, doing something to another.
F 3 is FLOW THREE, others doing things to others.
F 0 as run in the Introspection RD is FLOW ZERO, self doing something
to self.
R3R COMMANDS
Standard R3R Commands are used on Triple Dianetics.
They are the subject of another HCO B.
The Zero Command for the Introspection RD, however, is very easy being
"Locate an incident of (loss or emotion) (pain and unconsciousness) when
you caused yourself to have a(an) (item)" with the other commands of R3R as
usual.
NARRATIVE
The question will come up, do we Triple Narrative items or Multiple
somatic items.
The test is, did the flows already run F/N when they were originally
run. If they did, include them. If they didn't run exclude them.
This does not mean you omit everything that didn't run.
REPAIR
While auditing this FULL FLOW DIANETICS you will find various chains
that did not F/N when originally run.
These are included and should be concluded to F/N. This means one has
to find out if they by-passed the F/N, went too early, jumped the chain,
etc. Usually an L3RD assessed on that faulty action will give the answer.
It is easy to make these old flubbed chains F/N unless you work at it too
hard. Usually the reason they didn't is visible on the old worksheet. The
auditor forgot to ask for Earlier Beginning or by-passed the F/N or jumped
the chain or tried to run it twice forgetting he'd run it before. Corny
errors.
RESULT
The result of doing a FULL FLOW DIANETIC ACTION on a case is quite
spectacular. The shadowy remains of somatics blow, mass blows and the pc
comes up shining.
OFFERING FFD
Offering the public Full Flow Dianetics must include the cost of C/S
work since it is sometimes lengthy. It is best to sell the action at a flat
price that's more than adequate to cover the auditing as well as the hours
of FESing and FF table making as the time can be quite long.
The auditing can be remarkably brief. The greatest amount of time is
usually spent on the C/Sing and table making.
A C/S must liaise with the Dissem Sec and Treasury Sec on selling it or
he'll find the org is losing money doing the C/Sing and tables.
A nice big fat flat price, not by hours, is best.
OT WARNING
When doing Triple Dianetics on Clears and OTs (and a very few others)
it may be found that many chains are now missing or are just copies of the
original. Don't be disturbed. Pc says they're gone now they're gone. Just
F/N the fact and carry on with the next flow or item.
LRH:ams.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright �1971, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Added to by HCO B 4 April 1971-1R, Addition of 13 January 1975, Revised 22
February 1975, C/S Series 32RA-1 R, Use of Quad Dianetics, which is on page
377.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn C/Ses
Expanded Dianetics Series 21
Ref: Ex Dn Tape Lectures and Case Histories.
EXPANDED DIANETICS
DEVELOPMENTS SINCE
THE ORIGINAL LECTURES
Since the original lectures on Expanded Dianetics and Case Histories
were released several HCO Bs were issued under my name which I did not
authorize. These have been cancelled.
I thought I'd better cover the developments since the original
materials and clear up any questions or conflicts that may have arisen over
the unauthorized HCO Bs.
EXPANDED DIANETICS PROGRAMMING
Expanded Dianetics programming is not rote but each programme is laid
out for that individual pc taking him from his current state to a shiny
product.
The programme is worked out from data gotten by FES, OCA, Chart of
Human Evaluation and D of P Interviews.
The product of an Ex Dn complete pc is visible by OCA, Chart of Human
Evaluation, and pc satisfaction in having handled what he wanted handled.
Endless Ex Dn to no product occurs only when the C/S violates the
basics of Ex Dn programming as covered in my tape lectures and the Case
Histories, when the pc is run on actions that he doesn't need and aren't
reading or when the pc was not set up for Ex Dn in the first place.
EXPANDED DIANETICS SET-UPS
Usually a C/S Series 53RF and a list correction are needed set-up
actions if they haven't been done. A thorough C/S-l and full word clearing
are vital.
A Drug RD must be done or completed before Ex Dn is done or it will
fail. This includes Objectives. You can't do Ex Dn until Drugs are all
handled.
TROUBLE ON ENGRAMS
The pc who cannot run engrams has misunderstoods on the commands and
terms of R3R and Dianetics, or it's drugs. The pc will be able to run
drugs because that's what he's stuck in. He'll run those automatically as
long as you've done the necessary Word Clearing.
Pcs who won't go backtrack are druggies or in recent shock of having
died. This is handled by a thorough Drug RD and if necessary the usual
Dianetic backtrack remedies As and Es double-assessed. Ss and Ps could be
checked as well.
LATER EX DN RUNDOWNS
Class VIII C/S-6 list is useful in running out past bad auditing. It
is fully covered on Tape 1. Other Class VIII lists are not used as you
won't get anywhere running AEIs from a significance.
Intentions in AEI Treble Assessments are run in order of read.
Interest is not checked. As intentions exist on all 3 flows you could list
for the intentions on the other 2 flows after you have listed the
intentions connected with and run them R3R Triple. You can only list
and run intentions connected with a terminal or mass or somatic never a
significance.
The R3R commands are: F-1 "Locate an incident of another causing you to
have the intention _____." F-2 "Locate an incident of you causing another
to have the intention______." F-3 "Locate an incident of others causing
others to have the intention_____."
Good Intentions are never run. Never. The cure for a pc who is run on a
good intention is a C/S Series 53RF. The cure for the auditor is to fully
define the words: good, worthy, positive, pro-survival, evil, bad,
unworthy, negative and contra-survival. Then have him re-study the related
materials. If it recurs, get him audited on a 3 May PL and Ex Dn.
R3R all E. Purps culled from the folder is done as a first action in
Ex Dn. Subsequent E. Purps brought up in sessions are noted and R3R'd later
on in the programme before any PTS RD is done.
These E. Purps have to be verified as to wording and checked for read
before running, but not interest.
Considerable charge can be bypassed if E. Purps are missed so this
action is thoroughly done.
R/S Handling, also called the Responsibility RD, is done as OCA right-
hand side handling. A list of all R/Sing statements is made then each taken
up. The idea is an R/S will occur in connection with a terminal which will
read when checked, and that's what you want to run. The R/Sing statement
itself will often mention a terminal. If not the auditor can do a brief TWC
to find out the terminal connected with the statement.
Once the terminal is obtained the auditor lists (L & N) for the E. Purp
F-l, 2 & 3 R3R Triple on each after it's listed.
If no terminal can be found the auditor would have to L & N for the
intention of someone who would (R/S statement).
The Wants Handled Rundown is shown in Cases B, C and F. The important
points of the RD are to run it as a "wants to get rid of", not a "wants to
achieve" and to complete each thing the pc wants handled before going on.
Handling of each thing the pc wants handled is dictated by what the
"thing" is. A somatic is run R3R Triple. The intention connected with it
can also be run. An intention is run R3R Triple. If it's a terminal, L & N
for the intention connected with it and run it. You can also L & N and run
the intentions on the other 2 flows. If it's a condition L & N W/W would
have it then list for and run that terminal's intention. If it's a
doingness L & N for the intention of someone who would do that and run it.
Additional handling could be done such as PSEAIs double-assessed R3R
Triple, handling it as a problem by finding and running out the prior
confusion or tracing it back to the earlier problem it is a solution to and
running that R3R Triple. Difficulties on this RD stem from not getting the
thing the pc really wants handled which will read very well and run like a
bomb, or errors in the L & N or R3R or out ethics holding the condition in
place.
The Multiple-Flow E. Purp Rundown is a very high-powered action which
must be precisely done. Its use is covered in C/S Series 22 and Case C. It
consists of F-l: L & N "What Evil Impulse have others had toward you?" R3R
Triple. F-2: L & N "What Evil Impulse have you had toward others?" R3R
Triple. F-3: L & N "What Evil Impulse have others had toward others?" R3R
Triple.
SUMMARY
An Ex Dn programme is designed for an individual. C/Sing and auditing
are done to achieve a product.
When you're paralleling the mind the meter will be reading like mad,
the pc will be wildly interested and the results will follow big and fast.
With this broad change in Ex Dn I recommend that you re-listen to the
Ex Dn tapes, review DMSMH and The Original Thesis as well as the '63 Time
Track and R3R materials and re-study the Case Histories working out why
each C/S and pgm was done. Better yet do a thorough Ex Dn C/S Course.
I'm counting on you to really apply these materials and expect to see
lots of good results.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ams jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 DECEMBER 1971R
Remimeo (HCO B 2 December 1970 Revised)
Int RD (Revised 30 March 1974)
Checksheet
C/S Series 23RA
INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY
(Revised and updated to include 1971 Int HCO Bs)
All changes are in this type style.
INTERIORIZATION CAN BE BADLY MISRUN.
The following HCO Bs cover Interiorization Rundowns.
HCO B 5 Mar 1971 "Exteriorization and High TA"
HCO B 11 Apr 1970 "Auditing Past Exterior"
HCO B 6 May 1970 "Blows-Auditing Past Exterior"
HCO B 30 May 1970 "Interiorization Intensive-2-Way Comm"
HCO B 20 Aug 1970 "Exteriorization Rundown Musts"
HCO B 24 Sept 1971 "Urgent-Interiorization Rundown"
HCO B 29 Oct 1971 "Int Rundown Correction List Revised"
HCO B 16 Dec 1971 C/S Series 35R (Revised) "Interiorization
Errors"
HCO B 17 Dec 1971R C/S Series 23RA (this HCO B)
The examination of Interiorization Rundowns done in the field discloses
that some auditors engaged in running it have not been fully checked out on
it. HCO PL 26 Aug 1965 gives the correct way to do a starrate checkout.
Clay demos must also be correctly done. These are covered in HCO B 11 Oct
1967 and HCO B 30 Oct 1970. These HCO Bs on Int Rundown, Starrates and Clay
Demos plus HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, 2-WC as below, make the
necessary pack for checking out an auditor before letting him near an Int
Rundown. And all Interiorization materials as above MUST BE CHECKED OUT
STARRATE AND IN CLAY before a C/S permits one of his auditors to run it on
a pc.
QUADS CANCELLED
"The disadvantages of Quad Dianetics outweigh any advantages in actual
practice.
"Flow Zero is therefore cancelled as part of Dianetics and Lower
Grades. "(LRH HCO B 15 July 71, "Quads Cancelled".)
UNNECESSARY
"The words 'went in' and 'go in' MUST be said to the pc and cleared on
the meter. If there is needle action, one runs an Int RD as per the Int
Rundown Pack.
"If there aren't any reads one does NOT do an Int Rundown on the pc as
it is unnecessary and classifies as 'running an unreading item'.
"When this test is omitted you get an unnecessary Int RD being done on
a pc.
"This will eventually have to be repaired.
"FLUBBED R3R
"When the auditor does not do flubless auditing errors occur in the
auditing itself. These will hang up an Int RD.
"OVERRUN
"It usually happens that an Int RD is overrun. It goes flat on
Secondary F2, let us say. The auditor keeps on going past the win.
"This will hang up the Rundown.
"One of the ways an overrun occurs is the pc goes exterior during it.
Yet the auditor keeps on.
"Another way is pc has a big Cog, big win. Auditor keeps going on with
the RD." -LRH (HCO B 24 Sept 71, ''Urgent-Interiorization Rundown'')
REPAIR OF INT
"If even years after an Int RD the pc has a high TA or a low TA, then
Int trouble is at once suspected and the original Int RD and any repair of
it is suspected and must be handled. "-LRH (From the LRH original HCO B C/S
Series 35R, Revised 16 Dec 71, ''Interiorization Errors") (Handle it by HCO
B 29 Oct 71, "Int Rundown Correction List Revised".)
TWO-WAY COMM
There is a two-way comm step that follows a day or so after an
Interiorization Rundown .
An auditor doing this step, preferably the same auditor, MUST BE
CHECKED OUT ON TWO-WAY COMM.
No C/S should permit any auditor to do any 2-way comm until the auditor
has been checked out on HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, "Two-Way Comm
Checksheet". One can obtain these tapes easily from Pubs (as the Sea Org
has recently forced in this line and quality and delivery). Pending such
tapes one can certainly get the rest of the materials on the checksheet
done by the auditor and let him do 2-way comm while being very watchful as
a C/S.
C/SING INT
The correcting of an Interiorization Rundown is far harder than making
sure that auditors can do the usual in the first place.
Nearly all a C/S's hard work comes from auditors not well trained on
courses (indifferent courses) and failing to check auditors out well on the
materials before permitting them to deliver a new rundown.
The correction of Int is hard since until it is complete, other
auditing is inadvisable. One, however, gets the Int Rundown done.
"INT IS A REMEDY
"The Int RD is not understood as a REMEDY. It is not something you do
on all pcs.
"Pc goes Exterior in auditing.
"Later his TA goes high.
"Then you do an Int RD.
"You test Int for read as above. If it BDs you do an Int RD.
"You just don't do one because a pc goes exterior.
"One reason unnecessary Int RDs get done is that the Registrar sells
one. That makes the Reg a C/S. So the C/S and auditor run it.
"Maybe it wasn't needed.
"So if it wasn't needed it will eventually have to be repaired."-LRH
(HCO B 2
Sept 71, "Urgent-Interiorization Rundown") (Repair with an Int RD
Correction List Revised, HCO B 29 Oct 1971.)
The Interiorization Rundown is a REMEDY designed to permit the pc to be
further audited after he has gone exterior.
The Int Rundown is NOT meant to be sold or passed off as a method of
exteriorizing a pc. This is very important.
It is general auditing on usual Dianetics and Scientology actions that
brings about Exteriorization.
When the pc goes or is found to be exterior one then orders the
Interiorization Rundown. Otherwise the TA will misbehave.
The rundown is a REMEDY USED AFTER EXTERIORIZATION HAS OCCURRED BY
REASON OF GENERAL AUDITING.
Anxiety to get exterior will prompt a pc to buy and a Registrar to sell
an Interiorization Rundown. It is in effect just more auditing as far as
the Registrar is concerned. When a pc has gone exterior the Registrar can
insist on his buying enough hours for the remedy.
The Int Rundown stabilizes the exteriorization and makes it possible to
audit the pc further.
DISABILITY
If an auditor can't smoothly audit a rundown as simple as an Int
Rundown, then he is exposed as being unable to run Standard Dianetics and
should be cleared of his misunderstoods and overts and retrained.
The only real trouble one gets into on an Int Rundown stems from the
inability of the auditor to run a smooth, good TRed R3R session. Pcs are
not hard to run on it.
C/S WINS
A C/S cannot win at all if he is continually having to make up for
flubby auditing by the auditor.
Therefore the C/S must be very sure his auditors are fully checked out
on things they are to run before running them.
If there is no Qual Staff Training Officer or no Cramming, a C/S can
fully afford to do the training and cramming himself. Otherwise he will
lose far more than that time in C/Sing for auditors not checked out.
By the skill of his auditors you know the C/S. Not by his unusual
solutions after flubs.
The Int Rundown is too easy to do to have any trouble-the trouble comes
when the auditors are not checked out beforehand, starrate and in clay on
new things the are to run.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:MH:ntm.rd (Updated with recent
Copyright � 1970, 1971 ,1974 LRH data by order of
by L. Ron Hubbard L. Ron Hubbard by
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Training & Services
[HCO PL 20 July 1970, Issue III, Two-Way Comm Checksheet, Bureau) mentioned
above was revised on 25 November 1974 as a BPL.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973
Remimeo (Cancels HCO B 31 Dec 1971RC)
REISSUED 4 APRIL 74
C/S Series 53RG
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down
into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal
range to get pc's case handled better.
____________________________________________________PC
Name___________________Date
1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the
items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F, LF, LFBD [to
what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RG should be
reassessed and all reads handled. until it F/Ns on assessment.
A. Interiorization __________ Invisible __________
Went in __________ Black __________
Go in __________ Loss __________
Can't get in __________ Lost __________
Want to get out __________
Kicked out of spaces __________ F. Same thing run twice
__________
Can't go in __________ Same action done by
another auditor __________
B. List errors __________
Overlisting __________ G. Doing something with
Wrong items __________ mind between sessions __________
Upset with giving __________ Some other practice
__________
items to auditor __________
H. Word Clearing errors __________
C. Some sort of W/H __________ Study errors __________
Are you withholding
something __________ I. False TA __________
Is another withholding Wrong sized cans __________
something from you __________ Tired hands __________
Are others withholding Dry hands or feet __________
something from others __________ Wet hands or feet
__________
Has another committed Loosens can grip __________
overts on you __________
Have you committed J. Auditor overwhelming __________
any overts __________ Feel attacked __________
Have others committed Something wrong with
overts on others __________ F/Ns __________
Not saying __________ Overrun F/Ns __________
Problems __________ Missed F/Ns
Protest __________ Items really didn't read __________
Don't like it __________ Bad auditing __________
Audited over out ruds __________ Incomplete actions
__________
Feel sad __________
Rushed __________ K. Can't have __________
Tired __________ Low Havingness __________
ARC Brk __________
Upset __________ L. PTS __________
Can't get it __________ Suppressed __________
D. Drugs __________ M. Something went on too
LSD __________ long __________
Alcohol __________ Went on by a release
Pot __________ point __________
Medicine __________ Overrun __________
Auditor kept on going __________
E. Engram in restimulation __________ Over-repair
__________
Same engram run twice __________ Puzzled by auditor
Can't see engrams too keeps on __________
well __________ Stops __________
O. Repairing a TA that __________ N. Something else __________
isn't high Physically ill __________
Repairing a TA that Faulty Meter __________
isn't low __________ Nothing wrong __________
2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show
where mass lies.
A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int
RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 Amended 31
Dec 71.)
If pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD
providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R.
B. If any of these read, do an L4B on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4B in general. You
can go over an L4B several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4B gives nothing but F/Ns.
C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more
than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the
others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for
each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On
out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR HCOB 30 June 71,
Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk
of long duration.)
D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per
C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has
had a Drug RD, do L3B on it, and handle.
E. If any of these, do L3B and handle according to what is stated to do
on L3B.
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such 2wc E/S
it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and
if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List
to the pc's program.
1. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71, 15 Feb 72,
18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72, HCO B 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up
the bypassed charge with ( 1 ) Assess for best read (a) TA worries
(b) F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S
to F/N. (3) Rehab a time he felt really keyed out to F/N.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through
an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. These items are all
2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or retread.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow if qualified).
N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per I above.
General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as
nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to
handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return
to the C/S.
LRH:BW:BL:TD:ams.rd Revised by
Copyright � 1971,1972,1973,1974 L. RON HUBBARD
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1971RA
Remimeo Revised 6 April 1974
HGC Auditors
Dn & Scn C/S Series 28RA
Checksheets
C/Ses USE OF DIANETICS
Revised per HCO B 15 July 71, Issue I, "Quads Cancelled"
(Revisions in this type style)
Where a case has only been run on single flow Dianetics (Flow 1 ) one
goes back to the first Dianetic item ever run of which record can be found
and does F1, F2, F3 in that order.
To C/S a case for Triple Dianetics it is best to first lay out a
Scientology repair, making sure the case is flying, then list out the items
already run on Single and Triple. Then get them run so that all three flows
are complete on each item in sequence from first to last.
This includes any LX items, former practice, drugs or any other engram
running. These, like Dianetic items, are listed in their correct sequence
of former running.
Then the missing flows are run.
A rehab step of the flows already run is not necessary. This rehab of a
flow already run to EP is usually used only when there is question about
its having gone to F/N Cog VGIs. In C/Sing for Triples one COMPLETES any
flow of an item found that did not F/N. This is indicated on the Item list.
DOING THE LIST
The Item list is done by the auditor in his admin time for well done
time credits.
All former Dianetic items ever run are listed and what flows have been
run on them and to what end phenomena.
Example: Engram List
3 Sept 69 Sadness (exact wording that was used) F1
4 Sept 69 A Bored Feeling F1 Bogged
6 Sept 69 An Apathetic Outlook F1 Bogged
6 Nov 69 LX Agonized F1 F2 F3
7 Nov 69 Former Therapy F1 F2 F3
F2 Bogged
9 Nov 69 Earlier Practices F1 Bogged
10 Nov 69 A Horrible Sadness F1 Bogged
5 July 70 Int RD F1 F2 F3
F3 Bogged
6 July 71 An Awful Pressure F1 Bogged
Such a list is then handled from the earliest forward by:
(a) Completing the bogged flow and
(b) Completing the missing flow.
INT-EXT RD
This is handled in its proper sequence on the list if the TA is not
high or very low.
If the TA on the pc is currently high, Int is handled before any other
action is done and all three flows are run on it.
A drug chain also makes a high TA if in existence or unflat.
FLUBS
If any auditor has a poor record of getting Dianetic Results, of bogged
flows, etc, he needs an HDC Retread. His drills and TRs are out or he is
committing Gross Auditing Errors.
Dianetics gives remarkable results only when flawlessly done.
The commands must be precisely given and all commands 1-9 A-D are used.
It is NEVER shorted "because the pc did it".
C/Sing
It should be realized Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing. This
remains the same in Triple Dianetics.
RESULTS
Triple Dianetics, including the rerun actions, produces some very
startling new
Well done Dianetics always has produced fine results.
Triple Dianetics almost doubles the gain.
REMEDIES
Any and all Dianetic Remedies and general technology remain in full
use. They are not changed at all. Only Triple Flows are added in each
case.
Good Luck.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.ntm.rd
Copyright � 1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO B is added to by HCO B 7 March 1971, Reissued 13 January 1975,
C/S Series 28RA-1, Use of Quadruple Dianetics, page 374.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1971RA
Remimeo REVISED 8 APRIL 1974
All Auditors
C/Ses
Class VIII
C/S Series 33RA
TRIPLE RERUNS
(Revised per HCO B 15 July 71 Issue I
"Quads Cancelled"-Revisions in this type style.)
LAW: WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THE THREE FLOWS OF AN ITEM OR GRADE ARE LEFT
UNRUN, WHEN USED IN LATER PROCESSES THE EARLIER UNRUN ONES RESTIMULATE AND
MAKE MASS.
This tells you that high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness can come
from by-passed flows.
BY-PASSED FLOWS
Example: Dianetic singles have been run on 7 items. Now the auditor
begins to run new items Triple without running Triple on the already run
items. The result will be 7 unrun Flow 2s and 7 unrun Flow 3s. These will
restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge.
Example: Now let us say that Dianetics was all run Single and Grades
were run Triple. This will restimulate the Dn chains F2 and F3.
ANY LATER GRADE RUN WITH MORE FLOWS THAN USED IN EARLIER ACTIONS CAN
THROW THE EARLIER UNFLAT FLOWS INTO RESTIM, PILE UP MASS GIVING HIGH TA AND
BPC GIVING ARC BREAKS.
REPAIR
The more the condition is repaired by L1C, L4BR, etc, etc the worse
the Mass gets.
SOURCE OF HIGH TA
Thus High TAs have three principal sources:
(1) Overruns
(2) Auditing Past Exterior
(3) Earlier Unrun flows restimulated by those flows used in later
actions.
There are other minor ones such as Drug Background, illness, etc as per
Hi-Lo TA Assessment.
REHABS
One must NOT recklessly or continuously rehab a past major action. This
causes overrun. The thetan is placed at the end of the incidents not yet in
restimulation or run and the bank gets more solid.
MASSY THETANS
The whole trick of this universe is contained in thetans copying or
picturing incidents and then getting stuck in the later portion of them.
"Incidents" is the keynote. A Thetan is incident hungry.
This is what traps him.
For some reason he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase
them. The later he is in incidents and the later he is on the track the
more solid he is.
This also applies to the "auditing time track".
By omitting things like flows on the auditing time track, the thetan
thus becomes massy.
The whole theory of the Exteriorization Remedy is based on having gone
out (later) after he went in (earlier). So Exteriorizing can stick him.
(People buy the Ext RD to Exteriorize but the remedy is only done to permit
further auditing. They Ext of course when the bank is handled.)
When flows of items are by-passed and then later restimulated by
auditing them, mass occurs.
GETTING IN ALL FLOWS
When doing additional flows on earlier items or processes one must also
check or rehab those flows marked as run to F/N in worksheets.
This again will leave unflat flows and BPC unless it is done.
And if it is overdone it will raise the TA by overrun.
So if one had a case that had Single Dianetics and was later run on
Triple for new items (but the Singles not done into Triple) one would have
to RUN FIRST the missing unrun flow or flows and then check the first
Single F1 for flatness, then check other previously run flows.
The rule is run the previously unrun one or ones first to get charge
off, then verify or run the ones listed as run already.
Then one would do the same for the next item. Run the previously unrun
flow or flows and then verify or run those listed as already run to be sure
they F/N.
All items, in chronological sequence, and all processes, would have
to be run Triple.
IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME NOW TO RUN IN ONLY SINGLES.
So all C/Ses and Auditing actions are "Rehab or Run F1, F2, F3" when
getting in all flows on things run to date.
HIGH TA
When you are sure an EXT RD has been done correctly and its 2wc went
F/N and the TA later goes high, you check the EXT RD. That is the most
usual reason. This simple action is amazingly subject to flubs.
If the TA goes high later you can do a Hi-Lo TA Assessment and handle.
If the TA is still high or low, you had better check the state of
flows. Were more flows run on later actions than were run on earlier
actions?
If so, your pc has felt massy, sometimes even ill.
The right action is to get in all flows from the beginning. Bring all
his auditing up to Triple.
(If his folder is not available, he has kind of had it. I know of no
way, at this writing, to recover lost Dn items but will have to work
something out.)
NOT IN TROUBLE
If the pc is not in trouble, his best bet is to get on up the grades to
Expanded OT III.
IN TROUBLE
If he is massy and is having trouble the best bet is to:
(1) Be totally sure of his Int RD
(2) Check O/Rs particularly of a major grade twice or by-passed
F/Ns, locate and indicate them
(3) FES, list the items and grades and do a Full Flow action from
the beginning of his auditing, raising them all to Triple.
RUNNING ZERO FLOWS
(As run in the Introspection RD)
The Zero Flow in Dianetics is a bit strange. It can be done by full R3R
BUT it often depends on the decision the pc made and may F/N very suddenly.
It is easily overrun and can be very fast.
A pc can be gotten into trouble on Zero Flows if the auditor is slow
and is not alert to his meter and misses the F/N and gives R3R commands
after the flow has blown.
REHAB OR RUN
The auditor getting in Triple Flows can also ARC Brk the pc by failing
to verify if the previously run flows are flat. All the auditor wants is to
see them F/N on the command. If they don't he runs them.
Sometimes when he has "run them" again he finds they are being overrun
or run twice and has to rehab them by finding this out. The pc sometimes
doesn't know until he actually starts to run them. Then he finds they are
already run. The clue to this is a climbing TA. If the TA goes up, get off
that flow and rehab it.
Example: Pc at first thinks "Pain in shoulder" F2 was never run. Starts
to run it. TA goes up. Auditor must pull him off of it by finding out if it
is being run twice and rehab it to F/N.
The moral in all these reruns is don't firefight, keep an L1C List and
an L3RD List handy and use them.
RESULTS
The results of straightening up the Int-Ext RD, rehabbing O/Rs and
putting in ALL FLOWS on a pc are fantastic.
Getting an All Flows Rundown done correctly gives one all the latent
gain the pc has been begging for.
So send to Cramming all C/Ses and auditors who flub.
Program it right.
C/S it right.
Audit it right.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.ntm jh.rd
Copyright �1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO B is added to by HCO B 5 April 1971, Reissued 13 January 1975,
C/S Series 33RA-1, Triple and Quad Reruns, page 380. ]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1971 RB
REVISED 8 APRIL 1974
Remimeo REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974
All Auditors
Class VIII C/S Series 36RB
Dn Checksheet
Int-Ext Chksht (Revised per HCO B 15 July 71, Issue I
"Quads Cancelled")
(Revisions in this type style.)
This HCO B has been reissued as C/S Series 36RB.
HCO B 21 April 1971RA C/S Series 36RA,
''Dianetics-Getting in All Flows'',
is cancelled.
DIANETICS
(Applies also to Int-Ext Rundown.)
(Ref HCO B 4 Apr 71 RA, C/S Series 32RA,
and HCO B 5 Apr 71RA, C/S Series 33RA.)
TRs
TR Zero exists so an auditor is not ducking the session but can sit
there relaxed, doing his job.
TR One must be done so the pc can hear and understand the auditor
(without blowing the pc's head off either).
TR Two must be done so that the pc gets acknowledged. This can be so
corrupted that the auditor doesn't ack at all but gives the pc meter reads!
Instead of acks! Or keeps saying, "I didn't understand you," etc.
TR Three basically existed so that the auditor would continue to give
the pc commands and not squirrel off or pack up with total silence.
TR Four exists so that the pc's origins are accepted and not Qed and
Aed with or invalidated.
And, surprise, surprise, TRs are for use in the session itself, not
just a drill. They are how one runs a session.
Metering can miss every F/N or give "F/Ns" with high or low TA. And one
never feeds meter data to the pc: "That read," "That didn't read," "That
blew down," just must not exist in session patter. "Thank you. That F/Ned,"
is as far as an auditor goes. And that's the end of the cycle and says so.
Floating needles can be overlooked by an auditor. In Dianetics this
fault is fatal.
Auditor's Code must be in on all points and particularly Invalidation.
Pc says, "That's so and so." An auditor who says, "I'm sorry. You are
wrong," or any other invalidation is going to wreck a pc's case. A full
knowledge of the Auditor's Code and actually applying it saves endless
troubles. It is an auditing TOOL, not just a nice idea.
REHABBING CHAINS
One rehabs a Dianetic Chain that, according to a previous worksheet,
erased by saying, "According to session records (flow direction) (item)
erased." That's all. One does not say, "Did the chain giving others a
headache erase?" One does not run it again to find out. One does not run a
single command "to see if it F/Ns again". One can say, "Do you agree that
the chain giving another a headache erased?" But the more you ask the pc
to look for an erased chain the more messed up things will get. It isn't
there. But
the auditor by his action can imply it should be there or might be there. A
totally wrong approach would be "Look around your bank and see if what
isn't there any more isn't there."
Dianetics is NOT Scientology. A Dianetic Chain is not a release. If you
try to use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic Chain, you have had it. It
isn't a "release" (which is a key-out). A Dianetic Chain is an erasure. You
can't rehab erasures with "How many times?", etc.
The test of this is the doing. If you try to use Scn rehab on Dianetic
Chains, the PC MIGHT TRY TO FIND SOMETHING. This causes him to key in other
unrun or similar items.
It is a dangerous action at best to try to handle old erased chains.
The best you can do is to tell the pc what the old W/S said. If no W/S
exists leave the already erased flows alone!
FLUBBED CHAINS
Many times, a Folder Error Summary will give a flubbed chain and then
fail to note it was repaired in the next session!
A C/S and auditor would have been pretty irresponsible to just go on
auditing past flubbed chains.
The only safe way to handle some previous flubbed chain is to:
(a) Verify in the folder if it was repaired.
(b) If still unrepaired assess the L3RD on it and handle according
to the L3RD.
L3RD
Using the new L3RD (HCO B 11 Apr 71 RA) is a Dianetic action.
A Scientology auditor erroneously can try to use it as a two-way comm
type of list. If a chain needed one more ABCD, then two-way comm on it with
no ABCD is not going to complete it.
L3RD has its own directions. Questions not marked with directions are
used to indicate the fact. This can amount to two-way comm as the pc chews
it over. But L3RD where marked is handled by Dianetics actions. Look over
the list and its directions for each question and you will see that some
are given directions that are NOT 2wc.
Example: "Earlier beginning" reads. You can't just say, "The incident
had an earlier beginning," and you can't say, "Tell me about the earlier
beginning." The pc will go up the wall. There'll be no F/N. You have to use
R3R and get him to the earlier beginning and then run it and if it still
doesn't erase, get him to an Earlier Similar and erase that.
L3RD is a Dianetics List. It is not a Scientology List that is cleared
each question to F/N by 2-way comm.
OVERRUN
Overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA.
If as you seek to get in Full Flow Dianetics the pc's TA begins to
average higher, overrun is occurring.
Example: While doing FFD pc's TA has been riding at 2.2 and F/Ns. After
a new FFD action it begins to ride at 2.5 and F/Ns. Something is being
overrun. Find it and indicate it. And cease to stir the bank up so much!
The fault is going over items already run.
In doing a Full Flow Table you often find that the same or similar have
been run in the past. Sometimes you find that a previous attempt to run the
item a second or third time has resulted in an ARC Break, the reason for
which was never detected.
The right action is to note the session date it was first run and just tell
the pc, "Feeling Surprised was run three times. On (first date it was
erased) it was erased. When later run it was an overrun." This tends to
blow the later charge laid in by trying to run the same item again.
It sounds so strange that erased chains can be overrun. But it is true.
What happens is that pcs try to cooperate and put something there.
FIREFIGHTS
The action of a quarrel between an auditor and a pc is called a
firefight.
Restimulating earlier unrun engrams or overrunning chains upsets a pc.
The best action, as soon as a pc is disturbed, is to do an L3RD fast and
handle what reads the way it should be handled according to the L3RD.
The wrong way is to argue or try to go on.
The pc does NOT know what it is. He just feels awful. He tries to
guess. He will ARC Brk or get sad if the auditor continues.
The correct action is an L3RD.
L1C is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC Brk. L3RD is.
If the pc remains ARC Broken, try L3RD again, particularly the whole
L3RD.
A Scientology session would be handled with some other list (L1C, L4BR,
etc). A Dianetic session, including and especially FFD, is handled with
L3RD.
You NEVER prepcheck while doing Dianetics. This mushes up the engrams.
INTERIORIZATION
ALL these cautions apply as well to an Interiorization-Exteriorization
Rundown when restim occurs one uses an L3RD quickly.
Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology, action.
SAFE ACTIONS
A fully genned-in auditor, well crammed, well drilled, well skilled,
can be trusted with Dianetics, Dianetic Triples and an Int-Ext RD. Auditors
not so handled can get pcs into serious trouble with these things.
A safe course is to use Triples on new, never audited before pcs. Those
begun on Triples, use then only Triple flows.
Another safe way is to use FFD only on OT IIIs or OT IVs and done only
by fully qualified FFD auditors who are also OT III.
The safest course is to require special drilling and cramming on
auditors who are already known for their results by actual success story
stats and call FFD and Int-Ext RD a skilled specialty.
C/S RESPONSIBILITY
Any trouble a C/S is running into comes from the factors of TRs,
metering, Code and incomplete or false auditors' reports.
If when I am C/Sing I ever find an auditor has omitted key session
actions or has falsified a report, I order that auditor not to Cramming but
a full retrain HDC right on up.
A C/S does not see these points. He can get the pc asked what the
auditor is doing or did. He can get sessions monitored. This helps him fill
this gap in his data.
It's what isn't in the auditor's report that is often the trouble.
Auditors omit what they said, omit the firefight, omit session alter-is in
their worksheets.
All this sticks the C/S's neck out for the axe of failure.
So particularly in FFD, Int-Ext and other such actions, a C/S has to
act to obtain confidence in the auditor's TRs, metering, Code use and
accurate worksheets.
RISK
In FFD, Int-Ext RD and Power, experience has proven that if the auditor
is not top grade, if the C/S is not alert, we put a pc at risk.
The USUAL is what keeps the pc safe.
A thorough study of his case, looking for obvious bugs (such as Int-Ext
RD done twice, the case a druggie but drug engrams never run, Int done but
its 2wc flubbed, to name a few serious ones), sending auditors to Cramming
for the slightest flub, insisting on standard TRs USED IN SESSION, good
metering, use of the Code, accurate and complete worksheets, use of
standard tech, all guarantee the safety and progress of the pc.
INTRODUCING FFD
FFD (like the Int-Ext RD) requires flawless C/Sing and auditing or the
case goes wrong.
When these actions were introduced they showed up any flaws in case
studying, TRs, metering, Code and worksheets.
There are two ways to handle. (a) Cancel FFD and Int-Ext as actions.
Obviously that is going backwards and is impossible. (b) Begin and continue
a serious, effective campaign in the org to (1) Train auditors better, (2)
Cram expertly on every flub, (3) Raise quality of TRs and metering.
As you can see, my approach is to improve quality of training, cramming
and delivery.
Please help me out in getting this in.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .ts.rd
Copyright � 1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[This HCO B is added to by HCO B 21 April 1971-1R, Addition of 13 January
1975, Revised 22 February 1975, C/S Series 36RB-1R, Quadruple Dianetics-
Dangers of, page 383.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 APRIL 1974
Remimeo
Art Series 3
STAGE MANNERS
An actor, performer or musician should have a good command of what is
called" Stage Manners".
While it is not possible here to give a full text on the subject, these
basics should suffice.
1. The performer purpose is basically Communication.
(a) To Communicate one must have R (Reality)-which is to say one
must be visible.
(b) To Communicate one must have R that there is an audience there
to be Communicated to.
(c) A degree of Affinity with or for the audience must be
physically expressed. (One cannot treat an audience with contempt,
for instance.) (A perpetual smile is not a must, a respectful look,
a friendly look does as well.)
If you look over the above ABCs you will see that the general basic of
Stage Manners is the ARC Triangle. From this almost anything else can be
derived.
However, there are some traditional rules.
I. You accept applause. This is the contribution of the audience.
You do not cut it off. You acknowledge it with bows or other
physical actions. But you accept it. You don't dodge it.
II. You never turn your back on the audience. (An exception is an
actor in play stage situations.) You turn in such a way as to turn
facing the audience. You do not turn the other way around and so
give them your back.
III. Never express embarrassment or stage fright even when you feel
it. Force yourself into a physical appearance and expression of
poise.
IV. If you goof, ride right over it. Do not break off, call
attention to it or look helpless or foolish. Just ride right over
it and go on.
V. If you do not know what to do with your hands or feet, don't do
anything with them. Avoid twisting your feet or legs or hands or
arms around. Don't fiddle with things. Be positive in motion.
VI. During breaks or silent periods remember you are still on stage
and Stage Manners still apply.
VII. Always appear to be in control of the place and the audience.
VIII. Never let your poise be shattered by a sudden surprise. Ride
over it and handle.
IX. A performer DOMINATES an audience:
(a) By his comm,
(b) By his art,
(c) By his technical perfection,
(d) By his Stage Manners.
None of this means that one cannot clown, joke, act superior or even
seem austere. these are the arts of presence. But even in doing these,
Stage Manners are observed .
If as a small child one was always cautioned about his manners and
resented it one should get a clear idea of what manners are:
In a culture manners are the lubrication that ease the frictions of
social contacts.
On the stage, Stage Manners are the means of smoothing the problems of
interchange between audience and performer.
The hallmark of the professional performer, next to his art and
expertise, is flawless Stage Manners.
Stand before a full-length mirror. (Or use Video Tape.) Assume the
postures of your act. Accept applause gracefully. Bow gracefully. Smile
pleasantly. Laugh. Be dignified. Demonstrate poise. Assume the posture
needed for a non-applauding audience. Ride out boos. Demand more applause.
Do the postures to end your performance after applause. Accept a standing
ovation. Deplore not being able to give an encore. Appear at the start for
a first part of a performance. Assume the postures and poise needed on
stage during a one minute break between numbers. Accept a plaque. Accept
flowers. Ride over a bad goof. Be respectful to the audience. Kid the
audience out of it. Do each one of the IX rules. AND ALL WITHOUT SAYING A
WORD. Do it with physical motions or lack of them.
When you can do all these things and look right to yourself and feel
easy about them you will have and be confident of your Stage Manners.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ntm .rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn Spclsts
INTROSPECTION RD-THIRD ADDITION
Adds to HCO B 23 Jan 74R
Revised 10 Feb 74
Checklist
ADDITIONAL INTROSPECTION RD STEPS
The Introspection RD has as its dominant flow, Flow 0. This follows
from basic O/W theory where the person goes down the dwindling spiral to a
point where he can only restrain himself and do himself in.
The following steps must be added to the checklist to fully handle this
in the pc. Otherwise future efforts to help him will be blocked by his own
efforts to succumb.
14L. Check "doing yourself in" and "doing others in" for read and R3R
Quad the best read.
14M. L&N for the intention behind it.
14N. R3R Quad the intention.
14O. Repeat the steps above on the second one if it is also reading.
Also add the following to the RD after the E. Purps have been run R3R:
1. 2wc "Have you ever wanted to succumb?" to F/N.
2. If so, R3R Quad.
3. If so, L&N for the intention behind "wanting to succumb".
4. R3R Quad.
5. 2wc "Have you ever attempted to commit suicide?" to F/N.
6. If so, R3R Quad.
7. If so, L&N for the intention behind the effort to commit
suicide.
8. R3R Quad.
9. 2wc "Is there some other way you were doing yourself in that's
been missed?" to F/N. Note all reading items.
10. If so, R3R Quad the BD or best reading item.
11. If so, L&N for the intention behind it.
12 R3R Quad.
13 . Repeat 10, 11 and 1 2 on other hot reads.
This would be followed by a D of P Interview and attest unless some
adjustment actions were needed; these would be R3R any new E. Purps or new
R/S handling, a C/S 53RG or ruds or 2wc or HC List.
CAUTION
Do not run unreading items, miss reads or run wrong items as it will
wind the pc up in the soup.
A common error on R3Ring E. Purps culled from the W/Ses has shown up
that C/Ses must be alert for. This is taking up infinitive phrases like "to
go to the store" that appear to be E. Purps but in actual fact are
statements of future actions or conditions, not intentions.
Example: Pc says, "I was doing fine then Joe came along and caused me
to cave in." "To cave in" is not an E. Purp as stated. It wasn't the pc's
intention. Not valid.
Example: Pc says, "I was trying to hold on to the rope and he forced me
to fall off the cliff." "To fall off the cliff" was not the pc's intention
but a statement of an action. Not valid.
Example: Pc says, "I wanted to make them wrong and got sick." "To make
them wrong" was the intention, is valid and runnable.
Have you got the idea? If there is any question in your mind, clear the
word "intention", then go over a grammar text and sort out what an
infinitive and infinitive phrase are and how they're used.
You'll save the pc and yourself a lot of difficulty if you do this.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ntm.jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn C/Ses
Expanded Dianetics Series 22
EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES
The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be
made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it.
The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for
Ex Dn have been done.
Attach to the inside left cover of the folder.
__________
1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. __________
2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP.
__________
3. Pc has been given a thorough C/S 1 and is grooved in. __________
4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. __________
No no-interest but reading items remain unrun.
No medicine, drug or stimulant left unrun.
5. Pc successful at Dianetic Engram running. Can run Dn easily.
__________
6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method I run very flat to F/N list.
__________
7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L-3ExDRB
and R3R words. __________
8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53RG. __________
9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. __________
10. Pc has had any messed up L&N and Why lists corrected. __________
11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to
start Ex Dn. __________
__________
Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly
on Ex Dn.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:amsjh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 APRIL 1974
Remimeo
Art Series 4
RHYTHM
RHYTHM: Any kind of movement characterized by the regular recurrence of
strong and weak elements. Rhythm denotes the regular patterned flow, the
ebb and rise of sounds and movement in speech, music, writing, dance and in
other physical activities. Meter basically means measure and applies to a
system or pattern of measured recurrence of length, beat or numbers in
poetry or music.
TYPES OF MUSIC
RHYTHM
There are SIX distinct types of rhythm in music. These are:
REGULAR: Meaning the evenly accented (stressed) beat.
SYNCOPATED: The placing of upbeats along with downbeats at regular or
irregular intervals.
STOPPED: In a stopped rhythm there are regular distinct halts to the
flow of melody, but all the beats are there, they are simply regularly
halted for an interval. (The term comes from choreography as in tap dancing
where the dancer taps fill the stops. )
ACCENTED: Where one or more beats in a measure received a stronger
stress (beat) or accent. Accent in a rhythm can be done by volume,
duration, pitch or tone quality (timbre).
OMITTED BEAT: The regular omission of one or more beats in measures.
Time may have to be counted over two or more measures in order to regularly
omit. (Soul, Motown. )
ADDED BEAT: Additional strong or, generally, weak beats are added to
the rhythm in a consistent or inconsistent manner. (Bongos, Congas, etc.)
USAGE
Any and all rhythms are made up of the six basics above. One, two or
more can be employed in complex patterns.
REPETITION
Rhythm is rhythm because of repetition (recurrence).
RAPPORT
RAPPORT: Relationship, especially, one of mutual trust or affinity.
An audience in rapport is different than an audience of spectators.
An audience in rapport PARTICIPATES in small or large ways with the
performer or the artist or work of art, often by vocal or body motion.
Such participation is achieved by:
1. Reliance on the even recurrence of the rhythm.
2. Ability to predict it will recur.
3. Formation of agreement by such reliable prediction.
4. Permitting the audience to fill gaps or significances. Regular
omission of a beat or step or full explanation causes the audience
to fill it for themselves and brings about physical or mental
participation.
RHYTHM
All life is a repeating pulse and ebb and surge of motion.
Life becomes difficult when rhythmic prediction cannot occur. Anxiety
sets in. It is a relief to participate in predictable rhythm in an art
form. It is safe and reassuring. If the rhythm is exciting it is also
exciting. Therefore participation in predictable rhythm is pleasure and
even joy.
IMPINGEMENT
When one changes rhythm within a single work one "makes wrong" because
the person has predicted the rhythm but the prediction is not met. Thus he
is wrong. If the rhythm recurs, the person is made right.
A new rhythm attracts attention. If it is agreed with and recurs it
gets participation.
ART FORMS
The above materials, while written from the viewpoint of music, apply
to any art form.
Even prose has a rhythm.
Not all rhythms are pleasant or acceptable.
Many ways exist to utilize these observations on rhythm-i.e. one can
begin an unwanted rhythm, using the audience objection to impinge and then
turn it into a wanted rhythm.
As life itself is going through time and as time is recurrence, some
rhythms are too dull to attain any attention.
Rhythm, used in art forms, must therefore slow or speed or change the
expected rhythms of ordinary life in order to command attention.
Rhythm can sooth, lull, excite, arouse to any point of the emotional
tone scale.
A rhythm one half to one tone below the usual rhythm in life will
depress or degrade an audience.
A rhythm one half to one tone above the usual rhythm will dominate and
interest.
Rhythm and its expression is the basic key to all art forms.
LRH:ntm.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 MAY 1974
(Also HCO PL 31 May 1974)
Remimeo
UNHANDLED DRUGS AND ETHICS
Several recent cases have come to light where the person was permitted
to go on upper grades, Expanded Dianetics, Power and even OT Levels whose
drugs had not been handled.
In each case there was no or poor case gain, organizational upsets and
wasted auditing.
THEREFORE IT BECOMES FIRM POLICY THAT ANY REGISTRAR, C/S, D OF P OR
AUDITOR WHO PERMITS A PERSON WITH UNHANDLED OR PARTIALLY HANDLED DRUGS TO
BE AUDITED ON ANYTHING BUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DRUG RUNDOWN INCLUDING NO
INTEREST ITEMS WILL BE SUBJECT TO COMM EV WITH A MINIMUM PENALTY OF TREASON
AND A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF EXPULSION.
Tech must not be made to fail because of overt, covert or ignorant
misapplication of tech.
It is fully established that a chief cause of failure in cases is
unhandled or only partially handled drugs including medical drugs,
treatments and alcohol. This is a barrier to case gain and in this society
at this time, the major barrier.
Where drugs have not been handled or only partially have been handled,
the NO INTERFERENCE ZONE RULE is waived.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:clb.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 FEBRUARY 1972RA
Remimeo
All Supervisors (Revised 26 March 1972
Student's Hat and 8 July 1974
Mini Crse Changes in this type style. )
Super Crse
Word Clearing
Crse Word Clearing Series 32RA
Est Off Crse
Dept 13
Personnel URGENT-IMPORTANT-URGENT
Vital for all Supervisors,
Est-Os, and Cramming Officers.
WORD CLEARING METHOD 4
Tech and Admin Cramming Officers, Word Clearers and Course Supervisors
use Method 4 Word Clearing when fishing for a misunderstood word. E.g.
Cramming Officers use it to fish for misunderstood words concerning what
the person is being crammed on. Word Clearers use it on Interns when the
Intern needs a retrain or retread or even if the Intern is sent to
Cramming. Course Supervisors use it in the classroom CONTINUOUSLY ON NON-
F/N STUDENTS or queries.
The whole idea is the person requiring the Method 4 Word Clearing has a
Cramming Order or is not an F/Ning student because of confusion as a result
of a misunderstood word, as per Word Clearing Series 1 6R or omitted
materials.
Method 4 fishes for the misunderstood word, finds it, clears it to F/N,
looks for another in the area until there are no more with an F/N VGIs,
then moves to another area, handles that-eventually all the misunderstoods
that resulted in the Cramming Order or non-F/N student are handled.
It requires no C/S OK for it to be done. Method 1 is not a prerequisite
to Method 4.
E-Meter Drill No. 21 is the E-Meter Drill to be drilled on Method 4.
It's the method of fishing for a cognition.
Requires proper application of TRs and metering. All Supervisors, Est-
Os, and Dept 13 personnel to check out on, drill, and apply this tech AS IT
IS VITAL STUDY TECH.
METHOD 4 WORD CLEARING
1. Give person the cans, state, "I am not auditing you."
2. Ask while watching the meter:
"Is there any part of what you're studying you did not fully get?"
Trace the read. Use "fishing for a cog" drill (per HCO B 25 June 70,
Issue III) if needed .
If no read the question may be varied, e.g.
"Is there any part of the materials you're studying you disagree
with?"
or "Is there any part of what you're studying you feel you could not
apply?"
or "In (material being checked) is there anything you didn't
understand?"
Let the student tell you briefly. Do NOT tell him the data.
Verify that his study pack is complete as the data might have been
omitted. Also he might never have read the pack at all.
If the data was missing do not go on to Step 3. See that he gets the
complete pack and reads it. Then repeat Method 4.
If the person just has not read the materials do not go on to 3 but
get him to read the materials. Then repeat Method 4.
3. Get what it is then ask:
"What word was misunderstood just before that?"
Meter reads, Word Clearer finds the word, never accepting a confusion
but finds the word giving the read (SF, F,, BD), gets it looked up in a
dictionary and used in sentences until it can be seen from the
sentences that the student now understands the word and the word F/Ns.
All the tools of Study Tech and Word Clearing are at the Word Clearer's
disposal to take the word to F/N. The Word Clearer does not stop at one
misunderstood but makes sure all are cleared.
4. Repeat 2 & 3 until the materials are fully cleared up and any and all
misunderstoods or confusions handled.
5. If the action bogs when used in the classroom the student must be
sent to Qual for handling and Supervisor to Cramming on TRs and
metering and drilling on this procedure.
The correct action is a W/C CORRECTION LIST DONE ON THE STUDENT AND
HANDLED.
Of course if the above question F/Ns on asking, there would be no
misunderstoods on the material being checked, but the person is in
Cramming, not an F/Ning student or whatever, so there obviously are
misunderstood words to be found and handled.
Look at HCOPL 16 Feb 72, "The Purpose of the Dept of Personnel
Enhancement". It says this Dept "reaches and looks for business all over
the org and brings it in". So someone with stats down-student or post
stats, confusion about what to do, overloaded, can't seem to handle it, how
do you do this, etc, etc, are all indicators of misunderstood words as the
person is saying confusion, confusion. Well, underneath the confusion is a
misunderstood word just as Word Clearing 1 6R says.
Method 4 Word Clearing is what is used in doing and achieving the
purpose of the Dept of Personnel Enhancement, HCO PL 16 Feb 72.
One of the ways the Word Clearers in this Dept do the job is using
Method 4 Word Clearing.
METHOD 4 IS USED BY COURSE SUPERVISORS TO HANDLE ALL STUDENT QUERIES
ABOUT CONTENTS OF COURSE MATERIALS.
The reason students ask questions about "What is meant" is because of
omitted pack materials from their checksheet, failure to read what they
have OR BECAUSE OF A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD JUST BEFORE THEY GOT CONFUSED.
The Super has to know only where the materials are and BE SMART ENOUGH
TO DO METHOD 4 INSTEAD OF GIVING THE STUDENT ALTER-ISED ANSWERS THAT STOP
SCIENTOLOGY WORKING.
Word Clearing, especially Method 4, is how to get in HIGH CRIME HCO PL
7 Feb 1965, Reissued 15 June 70, "KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING".
SUCCESSFUL COURSE SUPERVISION AND SUCCESSFUL CRAMMING REQUIRE THIS
ACTION BE FULLY KNOWN AND U-S-E-D.
**K * E * E * P**
**S * C * I * E * N * T * O * L * O * G * Y**
**W * O * R * K * I * N * G**
LRH: clb .nt .rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1972, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1974R
Issue I
REVISED 24 JULY 1974
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 53R
(Revisions in this type style)
CLEAR TO F/N
(Word Clearing Series 32R has been corrected
as 32RA to require the F/Ning of all words
and forbids W/Cing on a high TA.)
Do NOT try to Word Clear a person Method 1, 2 or 4 whose TA is high at
session start. Use standard auditing procedures by an Auditor of the
required class to get the TA down to normal range. (Usually a C/S Series
53RG and handling.)
If the TA is high at start of session one of course cannot F/N a TA on
Word Clearing when it is high for some other reason.
ALWAYS F/N a word being cleared on the meter. It may happen there is a
chain and the word has to be earlier similared. But even then, when the
chain is F/Ned, the words on the chain that didn't F/N must F/N.
Example: A chemical type word reading. Doesn't F/N. E/S it on E/S
words, comes down to a lecture in school. The Mis-U word there F/Ns. Now
check the words touched while going E/S. Usually they just F/N.
Do NOT do a lot of words to "Clean" and say the person has been "Word
Cleared". Cases are messed up because the Word Clearing may be over out
rudiments or even out lists or out Int.
A Word Clearing worksheet must show truthfully all words F/Ned.
RED TAB
Where a pc has been Word Cleared on the meter without F/Ning or with or
to a high or low TA, THE WHOLE FOLDER MUST BE RED TABBED.
W/Cing worksheets must go into the pc's folder, just as why finding and
touch assists and other auditing actions must be put in the folder.
A pc red tabbed because of Word Clearing must be repaired within 24
hours, as in the case of any other red tab.
________
Stalled cases have been traced to Word Clearing errors. Repair of these
will get them going again.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1974R
Issue II
REVISED 24 JULY 1974
Remimeo
C/S Series 92R
(Revisions in this type style)
WORD CLEARING ERRORS
(Applies to Methods 1, 2, 4 and 5
done on a meter.)
The attention of the C/S is called to the revised Word Clearing Series
32RA which requires words be F/Ned and to HCO B 8 July 74 of the Word
Clearing Series which requires word clearing errors be RED TABBED and that
all Word Clearing worksheets be placed in folders.
Case troubles have occasionally been traced to metered W/Cing over a
High TA or failure to F/N words.
This is a hidden area from the C/S unless W/C worksheets are included
in folders and the RED TAB system for non-F/N at conclusion is used. Only
in this way is a C/S able to get all the data.
Correction of W/C errors is done by a Word Clearing Correction List.
High TA or Low TA at start of a W/C session is usually handled by C/S
53RG.
All "non-session" worksheets such as why finding, contact or touch
assists and Word Clearing should go into the pc's folder.
None of this can be used as an excuse not to word clear somebody. Make
a C/S handle that TA fast and Red Tab the folder until handling occurs.
Then do the Word Clearing.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1972R
REVISED 8 JULY 1974
Remimeo
(Translate to (Revision in this type style)
European
Languages) (Reissued 24 October 1974
as a Tape Course Series)
Word Clearing Series 42R
Tape Course Series 10
METHOD 4 NOTES
Too generalized a question in using Method 4 defeats its use and can
restimulate a person badly.
Example: "Is there anything in college you didn't understand?" That of
course is just plain ridiculous as a question. "Have you ever heard
anything you didn't understand?" would be similarly silly.
BREAK DOWN THE MATERIALS
When doing Method 4 you have to break down the materials (put them into
small separate units) in order to ask questions.
Example: We have Papers 1 & 2, both on the same subject. The wrong
question for Method 4 would be "Is there anything in Papers 1 & 2 you
didn't understand?" and not even give him the papers to see! The right way
to do it would be to take Paper 1 and break it down into its obvious
sections, give the person Paper 1 and let him look at it. Point to its 1st
section and say, "Is there anything you didn't understand in this section?"
while watching the meter. Then point to next section, do the same. Finish
Paper 1. Then go to Paper 2 and do it the same.
A person has to know what he's being asked about and has to be thinking
of it when asked the question.
TAPES
Just as it would be ridiculous to ask, "Have you ever misunderstood
anything you ever read?", it would be silly to ask, "Did you ever have a
misunderstood on Tape?"
The right way is to take the tape and put it on a machine and play a
bit of it. And ask, "Is there anything in the first section of this tape
you didn't understand?" while watching the meter. Then high speed the tape
forward to another area and do the same. Thus the tape is covered.
This can also be done from any tape notes, section by section.
BOOKS
Books are done chapter by chapter.
QUICKIE M4
Method 4 is defeated utterly by:
1. Bad metering,
2. Too general a question,
3. Not having the material to hand,
4. Not getting the person's attention on parts of the material,
5. Not taking each word found to F/N.
Quickie M4 misses. It sets the person up for a loss in his studying.
And we want him to actually succeed in his study, don't we?
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1974
Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Series 23
(Ref. XDn Series 9)
XDN CASE B
Further data on XDn Series 9.
On further data the failure of this case was due to:
1. PTS to friend of wife who was violently invalidative. He roller
coastered = PTS. The PTS scene should have been handled prior to
auditing but was not known or suspected at the time.
2. This case had been a drug addict and was married to a drug addict who
had been a prostitute and who persuaded him back on drugs. The drug
rundown "no interest items" should have been run and he should have
been cleaned up on drugs before beginning XDn. It has been proven out
time and again that when a very full and complete drug rundown is not
done, pcs do not succeed with any other type of auditing including
Expanded Dianetics.
FURTHER NOTES
Further research has shown that headaches are almost invariably an
Exteriorization-lnteriorization problem. This research case should have had
his Ext-Int handled fully.
__________
These items added to the research program, before any others, would
have brought success:
i. Handle Ext-Int by repair or rundown.
ii. Handle any out lists L4B.
iii. Handle PTS Situation fully and rapidly.
iv. Complete Drug RD by culling all "no interest items" and running
them.
Further repair of this case would include the above but would add:
v. Do an L4B on intentions lists to be sure no lists are out and
repair.
vi. Do R3R on all reading evil intentions whether pc interested or
not.
SUMMARY
Data gained from running this Case B has been of great assistance in
handling other cases since the faults found were not repeated.
Hundreds, probably thousands of cases are now winning on XDn with
permanent gain. This is due to using fully the developed tech with full
skill.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973R
(Cancels HCO B 31 December 1971 RC)
Revised & Reissued 30 August 1974
Remimeo
C/S Series 53RH
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down
into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal
range to get pc's case handled better.
_________________________________PC Name________________________ Date
1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the
items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F,, LFBD [to
what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RH should be
reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment.
A. Interiorization _________ Problems _________
Went in _________ Protest _________
Go in _________ Don't like it _________
Can't get in _________ Audited over out ruds _________
Want to get out _________ Feel sad _________
Kicked out of spaces _________ Rushed _________
Can't go _________ Tired _________
ARC Brk _________
B. List errors _________ Upset _________
Overlisting _________ Can't get it _________
Wrong items
Upset with giving _________ D Drugs _________
items to auditor _________ LSD _________
Wrong Why _________ Alcohol _________
Wrong Indication _________ Pot _________
Wrong PTS Item _________ Medicine _________
C. Some sort of W/H _________ E. Engram in restimulation _________
Are you withholding Same engram run twice _________
something _________ Can't see engrams too
Is another withholding well _________
something from you _________ Invisible _________
Are others withholding Black _________
something from others _________ Loss _________
Has another committed Lost _________
overts on you _________
Have you committed F. Same thing run twice _________
any overts _________ Same action done by
Have others committed another auditor _________
overts on others _________
Not saying _________
G. Doing something with L. PTS _________
mind between sessions Suppressed _________
Some other practice _________
M. Something went on too
H. Word Clearing errors _________ long _________
Study errors _________ Went on by a release
point _________
I. False TA _________ Overrun _________
Wrong sized cans _________ Auditor kept on going _________
Tired hands _________ Over-repair _________
Dry hands or feet _________ Puzzled by auditor
Wet hands or feet _________ keeps on _________
Loosens can grip _________ Stops _________
J. Auditor overwhelming _________ N. Something else _________
Feel attacked _________ Physically ill _________
Something wrong with
F/Ns _________ O. Repairing a TA that
Overrun F/Ns _________ isn't high _________
Missed F/N _________ Repairing a TA that
Items really didn't read _________ isn't low _________
Bad auditing _________ Faulty Meter _________
Incomplete actions _________ Nothing wrong _________
K. Can't have _________
Low havingness _________
2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show
where mass
lies.
A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int
RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 R,
Revised 14 May 74.)
If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD
providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R.
B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You
can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong
Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78.
C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more
than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the
others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for
each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On
out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR, HCO B 30 June 71,
Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk
of long duration.)
D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per
C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has
had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle.
E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to
do on L3RD.
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If -Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such
2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before
that and if TA now down do L1 C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List
to the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71,12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72,18
Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the
bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b)
F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N.
(3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through
an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be
obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items
are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or
retread.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow, if qualified).
N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA handle per I
above.
General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as
nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to
handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return
to the C/S.
Revised by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt jh
Copyright � 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 AUGUST 1974
Remimeo
Tech Secs
C/Ses URGENT
Auditors
Registrars
C/S Series 93
NEW GRADE CHART
The "NEW" thing to do is the Grade Chart. Everything you are doing
should contribute to getting the pc up the Bridge. THIS is the Bridge.
There is a new Grade Chart being prepared which has some changes in it,
based on recent discoveries. It is urgent that you know of these in
advance.
DRUG RUNDOWN
The effects of an omitted or incomplete Drug RD are severe enough to
deny a person any lasting case gain.
This is covered in HCO B 31 May 74, "Unhandled Drugs and Ethics". Some
orgs have taken this HCO B so literally however, that they have taken pcs
off Adv Cses Grades, refused to do Assists on ill pcs and some showed pcs
the HCO B and invaled their gains.
This was not the intention of the HCO B. The C/S Series remain valid.
The Drug RD belongs on the Grade Chart after Life Repair. A Drug RD
cannot be done over out ruds and a Life Repair may be necessary to get in a
pc's ruds.
Life Repair is not a prerequisite for the Drug RD, however, and if done
is not to be dragged out intensive after intensive. In some cases a pc
could not complete Life Repair without a Drug RD.
Following the Drug RD is ARC S/W, then the rest of Dianetics to
completion.
EXPANDED DIANETICS
Ex Dn by the way belongs after Grade IV Expanded.
Some pcs R/S and have Evil Purposes to do others in. But no Grade 0 or
Grade I or Grade II. What others? Martians?
"Got to secretly do everybody in" probably applies to Apeville some
long date ago and he's never come up to PT.
The answer is to bring the pc up the Grade Chart to Expanded Grade IV
then do his Ex Dn.
The prerequisites for Ex Dn are covered on HCO B 23 April 74, Ex Dn
Series 22, "Expanded Dianetics Requisites". Add to that Expanded Grades up
to IV and you have it.
GRADE II
Some orgs specialize in Grade II, especially on org staff. The pc is
always getting Integrity Processing or his O/Ws pulled on so and so.
If you look on the Grade Chart you will find Withholds and Overts are
Grade TWO.
Below Grade TWO lies Grade I (Problems) and Grade Zero
(Communications). And below that is Dianetics and at the bottom end of
Dianetics is the Drug Handling.
Now how do you expect a fellow who has unhandled drugs (or omitted drug
items because of "no interest") to even know (no Grade 0) that other people
are around or that (Grade I) he is caved in with problems he's never
cognited on?
And he's supposed to have enough responsibility to answer up on Grade II?
With real overts and withholds?
This does not mean you must never Sec Check. It does mean that Sec
Checks are no substitute for auditing or guarantee of innocence.
Grades are Grades and the Grade Chart sequence is correct.
SOLO SET-UPS
Set-ups for Solo are fully covered on HCO B 8 Jan 72R, Revised 8 July
74, Solo C/S Series 11 R.
This will be included as part of Solo on the Grade Chart as it is a
vital step.
Pcs won't make it on Solo if they aren't set up.
FULL LIST
Here's the full list of Grades showing where the various RDs now offered
fit.
GROUP PROCESSING-Not mandatory or a prerequisite.
LIFE REPAIR-As needed but not prerequisite for Drug RD. To get ruds in
on Life.
DRUG RD, means:
TRs 0-4, 6-9-Mandatory for a Druggie currently on Drugs, FLAT.
Full C/S-1-Where not done. To fully educate pc.
Objectives-Full battery to full EPs per basic books and early HCO Bs on
them.
Class VIII Drug Handling-List and rehab all drugs, 3 way Recalls,
Secondaries and Engrams of Taking and Giving Drugs.
AESPs on each reading Drug-Listed separately and handled with R3R, each
drug to full F/N assessment of Drug List.
"No Interest" Drug Items-All reading ones run where they exist.
Prior Assessment-AESPs listed separately and run R3R, prior to first
drug or alcohol taken.
ARC S/W EXPANDED.
DIANETICS, means:
C/S 54-Complete handling of Pc Assessment Form begun with Drug
RD.
Health Form-Fully handled to full F/N Assessment.
EXPANDED GRADE 0-As issued.
EXPANDED GRADE I-As issued.
EXPANDED GRADE II-As issued, including Integrity Processing.
EXPANDED GRADE III-As issued.
EXPANDED GRADE IV-As issued.
EX DN-Not mandatory except where pc is a low OCA, an R/Ser (2%,
chronically ill or psycho. Means:
Set-ups-Per HCO B 23 April 74, Ex Dn Series 22.
Introspection RD-Where pc ill, introverted or in a psychotic break.
R3R all E. Purps.
OCA Left-hand Side Handling-As issued.
OCA Right-hand Side Handling-As issued, with PTS RD as necessary.
POWER PROCESSING GRADES V & VA-Only prerequisites are Drug RD and Grade
IV.
SOLO GRADE VI, means:
Solo Set-ups-Done at SH or AO per Solo C/S Series 11 R.
Solo Auditor's Course.
Solo Audit Grade VI materials.
CLEARING COURSE
OT I
OT II
OT III
OT VII PROCESSES
OT III EXPANDED
OT IV
OT V
OT VI
FULL OT VII VERIFICATION
OT VIII-When issued.
PROGRAMMING
The C/S Series, especially the early HCO Bs, numbers 1-13R, fully cover
the use of the Grade Chart in programming.
THE GRADE CHART IS THE BASIC PROGRAMME OF A PC.
This datum has been neglected in some orgs, who have specialized in the
new RDs developed since '71.
With refinement of repair and corrective actions and the release of new
RDs, some may have forgotten that repair is only done to get off the
overwhelm so that you can put the pc back on the Grade Chart.
SUMMARY
I thought I'd better fill you in on these changes and how the new Grade
Chart lines up.
Make full use of this Chart with C/S Series programming tech in and
your pcs will fly.
Here's to lots of case gain and rave success stories.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rs.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1974
(Adapted from LRH ED 178 INT of 30 May 1972)
Remimeo
All Staff
All Auditors
All Students
All Scientologists
Word Clearing Series 54
SUPERLITERACY AND THE CLEARED WORD
SUPER-Superiority in size, quality, number or degree.
LITERACY-The ability to read and write.
Almost everyone these days is able to read and write. This was not true
a century ago but, with modern stress on education, it is true today.
But is this enough today?
It is an instruction book world. The civilization in which we live is
highly technical.
Education today goes into the twenties.
That's a third of one's life.
And what happens when one leaves school?
Can he do what he studied?
Does he have all his education or did it get left behind?
Literacy is not enough.
Today's schools and today's world require a new ability-the ability to
look at a page without any strain and absorb what it says and then apply it
right now without any stress at all.
And is that possible?
Am I talking about speed reading?
No. That is just being able to read rapidly. It does not improve the
comfort of reading and it does not improve the ability to apply.
What is really needed is the ability to COMFORTABLY and QUICKLY take
data from a page and be able at once to APPLY it.
Anyone who could do that would be SUPER-LITERATE.
What happens?
The average person-literate-is able to read words and mentally record
words.
[pic]
[pic]
And he thinks in concepts to which he can fit words easily and so can write
clearly.
In other words, when one is Super-Literate, one reads not words but
understandings. And so one can act.
CONCEPTS
The idea of grasping word meanings conceptually is something new to the
field of Linguistics. The endless Semantic circles pursued by Korzybski and
company (see Data Series 1, "The Anatomy of Thought") never really led to
the realization that a word and its meanings are embodied in the basic
concept or idea symbolized by that word.
That conceptualization of meanings is foreign to dictionary writers and
"experts" is evidenced by the fact that definitions are so subject to alter-
is and change with the passage of time.
For example, modern definitions of the word "understand" are found to be
largely inadequate. A really full and meaningful definition of it could
only be found in a First Edition of Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms, 1942:
"Understand. To have a clear and true idea or conception, or full
and exact knowledge, of something. In general it may be said that
understand refers to the result of a mental process or processes (a
clear and exact idea or notion, or full knowledge). Understand
implies the power to receive and register a clear and true
impression."
CLEARED WORDS
Operating within a society steeped in misunderstood words and mis-
definitions, Study Tech is subject to arbitraries. Thus, a CLEARED WORD is
defined as follows:
A WORD WHICH HAS BEEN CLEARED TO THE POINT OF FULL CONCEPTUAL
UNDERSTANDING.
In Metered Word Clearing this translates as:
F/N, VGIs.
There are many ways and combinations to achieve this EP. Using the word
in sentences until the meaning is grasped conceptually is the most common.
Diagrams, demos, clay, in fact the entire body of Study Tech and its
methods are applicable.
These are vital tools. For use. Protect them and KEEP SCIENTOLOGY
WORKING.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rs.rd
Copyright � 1972, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1974
Remimeo
All Execs
All Tech and URGENT-IMPORTANT
Qual Divs
C/S Series 94
REDUCTION OF REFUNDS
C/Ses AND OVERLOAD
When a C/S is overloaded, he is a potential cause of OUT TECH.
He may try to make up time by not reading worksheets of Auditors, by
failing to do Folder Error Summaries, by not taking time to write Cramming
Orders and neglecting other C/S duties.
Recent evaluation has shown that OVERLOADED C/Ses CAN BE THE REASON FOR
A HUGE REFUND RATIO IN THE ORG'S GI-CGI.
Any non-tech person such as the Ethics Officer can tell at once when a
C/S is either not working or overloaded. THE HANDWRITING IN THE WORKSHEETS
CAN'T BE READ, WORDS ARE NOT CLARIFIED IN RED, NO FESes ARE SEEN IN FOLDERS
AND NO CRAMMING ORDERS EXIST TO MAKE AUDITORS DO HANDWRITING DRILLS TO
WRITE FAST AND WELL.
Proper C/S posting was piloted by me on Flag years ago. The existing
technical executives failed to export it to orgs.
The irreducible minimum C/S postings are:
SENIOR C/S who handles bugged cases and very upper level actions and
keeps the other C/Ses functioning well. He is the highest classed C/S in
the org. He is responsible for proper handling and results on all cases.
(This is a hat I usually wore in an area.)
EXPANDED DIANETIC C/S who does only Expanded Dianetics.
GRADE C/S who C/Ses Grade pcs.
DIANETIC C/S or C/Ses who handle all routine C/Sing of Dianetics
including Drug Rundowns.
There are several other C/S posts. In AOs additionally there are Solo
C/Ses. In Saint Hills there are Power (Class VII) C/Ses.
As an org expands it can have additional types of C/Ses. Some of these
are:
REVIEW C/S who reviews tech case failures, taking this load off the
Senior C/S.
STAFF CASES C/S who C/Ses for audited staff.
STUDENT AUDITING C/S who C/Ses student sessions.
AO REVIEW C/S who C/Ses for fast review on Adv Cse Students.
CO-AUDIT C/S where a Co-Audit exists separate from HGC lines.
WHAT IS OVERLOAD?
When a C/S can't read every worksheet and study and program every case
he has, due to time, he is overloaded.
WASTED C/Ses
To get a Class VI or even a Class IV to C/S lower action folders is a
waste of C/Ses since it is easy to train Dianetic C/Ses.
SUMMARY
TRAIN AND POST enough C/Ses and watch the GI go up and refunds go
down.
It is not enough just to get Auditors and more and more Auditors.
DON'T OVERLOAD C/Ses. GET MORE OF THEM!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1974
Remimeo
IMPORTANT
HANDLING FLUBBED PCS
In 1970 when auditing by intensives was reimplemented it became clear
that Tech repaired any flubs on pcs and did not send them to Qual.
Tech did its own repair.
Now, with the emphasis on Qual correcting Auditors and C/Ses it is very
important that this rule is followed.
TECH CORRECTS ITS OWN FLUBBED PCS. IT DOES NOT SEND THEM TO QUAL.
Qual must not get into the HGC business. Tech is there to deliver the
technology. Qual is there to safeguard the technology by correcting the
personnel who flub delivering it and get them to deliver it correctly.
Qual does not correct the pcs.
TECH ACTION
The routine Tech action when a pc is flubbed or Red Tagged is for the
Auditor to take the pc back in at once and repair any error with the
correction list for that action.
Example: Auditor doing an L&N. Pc Red Tags after session. Auditor takes
the pc right back in and does an L4BR and corrects the list.
Example: Auditor doing Ruds. Pc Red Tags with a high TA. Auditor takes
the pc back in straight away, assesses a C/S 53 and handles.
If the Auditor can't handle he sends the folder to the Tech C/S who
studies the folder, finds the bug and gets it handled fast.
The maximum wait is 24 hours. A red-hot Tech Division handles the same
day.
QUAL ACTION
Qual crams the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors. The Qual Sec makes
sure that the Cramming orders are done and that the flubs are corrected.
But, QUAL DOES NOT CORRECT THE PC. TECH DOES.
SUMMARY
When Quals get into the HGC or Academy business and start delivering
the courses or intensives, the Tech goes out the window BECAUSE THEN THERE
IS NO QUAL. Qual corrects the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors.
Tech corrects its own flubbed pcs.
LRH: nt jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Qual Div Hats HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1970RA
Tech Div Hats (HCO Pol Ltr of 16 Dec 1968 and
SHSBC Students 7 Sept 1969 Amended and Reissued)
ARC Break Auditor Amended 8 August 1970
Revised 17 September 1974
Revised 29 September 1974
GREEN FORM
BEFORE ANY AUDITOR IS PERMITTED TO DO A GF OR ANY PREPARED LIST HE MUST
BE ABLE TO MAKE LISTS READ WITH CRAMMING ON TR 1 AND CRAMMING ON HCO Bs 28
FEB 71 (C/S SERIES 24), 9 JUNE 71, ISSUE I (C/S SERIES 41), 20 DEC 71 (C/S
SERIES 72), 15 JUNE 72 (C/S SERIES 80), 15 OCT 73 (C/S SERIES 87), 20 NOV
73 (C/S SERIES 89), 6 DEC 73 (C/S SERIES 90), AND BTB 16 JUNE 71R, ISSUE I
(FORMERLY HCO B 16 JUNE 71R, ISSUE III).
In HGC the Green Form is done on the order of the Case Supervisor to
detect reasons for case trouble. If the TA is high or low use C/S 53RH
instead. It is assessed Method 5 and handled. The new Auditor's Code is
observed on every line. If the line reads and the pc or pre-OT protests it,
has no answers, seems ARC Broken by the read or resigned or starts to
explain how the thing has been run before, check for false read. Use False
and Suppress as per BTB 18 Nov 68R.
On Environment ARC Break the Remedy B-Environment, BTB 14 Aug 68R, is a
limited process. S&D is also a limited process, only one F/N available on
W, one F/N on S, one F/N on U. They are only done on C/S instructions.
Do not audit a pc or pre-OT who has not had sufficient food or rest or
who has taken aspirin or drugs; check this before session. If he or she has
had insufficient food or rest, send the pc home to have this handled.
Indicate the by-passed charge of the incomplete cycle of action of the
session on both Questions 2 and 3.
The Green Form should be run to F/N VGIs with all reads taken to F/N.
It can be done Method 3 and taken to a good win, F/N VGIs. If done M3 it
must not be run past the first F/N.
PC OR PRE-OT NAME DATE TIME__________
NAME OF AUDITOR CLASS GRADE________
ALL FOLDERS TO HAND LAST AUDITOR'S NAME___________________
CONTAINS BEGINNING ASSESSMENT FORM____________________________
1. FOLDER C/Sed BY NAME TA______
PC OR PRE-OT GRADE PC OR PRE-OT CLASS__________
2 . SUFFICIENT SLEEP
PHYSICALLY TIRED
SUFFICIENT FOOD
ARE YOU HUNGRY
ALCOHOL
ASPIRIN/TRANQUILIZERS
DRUGS (FIND OUT WHAT IS BEING TAKEN OR WHAT DRUG ITEMS WERE NOT RUN AND
WHY)
3. WANTS AUDITING (IF DOESN'T, DISCUSS WHY NOT, GET PC TO
EXPLAIN)
4. (a) ARC BREAK (Handle by ARCU CDEINR earlier similar ARC Break.) On
new pcs ask if there has been an upset (handle as above).
SESSION ASSESSMENT
(b) ENVIRONMENT ARC BREAK
(ARCU CDEINR or Remedy B if ordered by the C/S.)
(c) AUDITING ENVIRONMENT
(Prepcheck.)
5. (a) IGNORED ORIGINATIONS
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(b) PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.) New pcs: "Do you have a persisting
problem?" (Handle as above.)
(c) EVALUATION
(d) INVALIDATION
(e) MISSED WITHHOLDS
(Who nearly found out, what did they do to miss it, earlier
similar M/W/H to basic.) New pcs ask: "Has someone nearly found out
something about you?" (Handle as above.)
(e-1) WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP
(Who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate false
read. 2wc the concern.)
(f) OVERTS
(Itsa earlier similar overt to basic.) New pcs: "Have you done
something you shouldn't have done?" (Handle as above.)
(g) MISUNDERSTOOD WORD OR SYMBOL
(Clear it to F/N.)
(h) COMMITTING CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa or "Prevent Process".) New pcs: "Are
you continuously doing something you shouldn't do?" (Handle as
above.)
6. NO AUDITING
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
7. (a) SOMETHING THAT ISN'T THERE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(b) TRYING TO PUT SOMETHING WHERE THERE IS NOTHING
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(c) FALSE ASSERTION
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
8. (a) ASSESSED BEYOND THE RIGHT ITEM
(Correct the list and give the pc his item.)
(b) INCOMPLETE LIST
(Complete the list and indicate the item.)
(c) OVERLISTED
(Indicate, null with Suppress and get the item.)
(d) SOMATIC ITEM ON A LIST NOT READING BUT SOMATIC EXISTS
(Handle as per HCO B 29 Jan 70, "Null Lists in Dianetics".)
9. (a) PICTURE NOT ERASED
(Complete chain to erasure and full end phenomena.)
(b) STUCK PICTURE
(L3RD or run "Recall a time before the incident. What was it?"
"Recall a time after the incident. What was it?")
(c) PICTURES CHANGING
(L3 RD.)
(d) NO SOMATICS
(2wc to F/N, note for C/S.)
(e) RECURRING SOMATIC OR FEELING
(Write down any items given and their reads. Run any item that BDs
by R-3R.)
(f) FORCED TO GO EARLIER PAST THE BASIC ON A CHAIN
(Locate basic on chain, A, B, C, D or earlier beginning then A, B,
C, D as required to F/N, cognition, VGIs and erasure.)
(g) AN EARLIER BEGINNING ON AN INCIDENT BEEN MISSED
(Earlier beginning, A, B, C, D to F/N and end phenomena.)
(h) JUMPED CHAINS
(Write details. If original chain found, run R-3R to end
phenomena.)
(i) BLACK FIELD
(L3RD.)
(j) INVISIBLE FIELD
(L3RD.)
(k) DISTURBED WHILE RUNNING AN INCIDENT
(Clean up any ARC Brk with ARCU CDEINR earlier similar ARC Brk to
F/N and GIs. Check if chain erased and if not, run R-3R to end
phenomena.)
(l) WRONG DATE
(Indicate, get the right date.)
(l-1) WRONG LOCATION
(Indicate, get the right location.)
(m) PSYCHIATRIC INCIDENT
(Run R-3R.)
10. (a) LOWER LEVELS UNFLAT
(Find out which and note for C/S.)
(b) LOWER LEVELS OVERRUN
(Rehab any overrun.)
(c) LOWER LEVELS NEVER RUN
(Note for C/S.)
(d) ACTUALLY RUN THE PROCESSES FOR EACH GRADE
(Note for C/S.)
(e) HAS POWER PROCESS BEEN LEFT UNFLAT
(Not to use on Clear and above; Grade V, VA checked by Class VII or
VIII Auditors only.)
(f) HAS POWER PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN
(Same as (e). Rehabbed by Class VII or VIII only.)
(g) IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED
(Note for C/S.)
11. (a) FALSE ATTESTATION
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(b) UNTRUE ASSERTIONS ABOUT CASE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(c) TOLD A LIE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(d) WASN'T SURE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(e) MISUNDERSTOOD TECH
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(f) MISUNDERSTOOD CASE CONDITION
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(g) EXPERIMENTING
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(h) ALTERING TECH
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(i) DOING SOMETHING ELSE WITH TECH
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
(j) HAVE YOU TYPED, HANDWRITTEN OR TAPED COPIES OF ANY CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIALS
(Handle with time, place, form and event, Itsa earlier similar
Itsa.)
12. (a) PROCESS LEFT UNFLAT
(Find out which process and note for C/S.)
DATE OF SESSION
(b) PROCESS OVERRUN
(Rehab.)
DATE OF SESSION
13. FORMER RELEASE
(Find what release has not been acknowledged and Rehab.)
14. NON-STANDARD PROCESS
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
15. BAD AUDITING COMM CYCLE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa, L1 C if necessary.)
16. CODE BREAKS
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
17. HIDDEN STANDARD (WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR YOU TO KNOW
SCIENTOLOGY WORKS?)
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
18. MIXED THERAPIES (ANY OTHER TREATMENT IN PROGRESS)
(Note what.)
19. CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa or S&D only on C/S order, or handle as in
4a.)
20. (a) CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP
(Handle as in 19.)
(b) ENVIRONMENTAL MENACE
(Folder to C/S.)
21. HERE TO GET DATA FOR SOMEONE ELSE
(What, when, all, who.)
22. HERE BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE DEMANDED IT
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
23. SELF-AUDITING DURING INTENSIVE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
24. BEING AUDITED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN AN HGC AUDITOR
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
25. CRIMINAL RECORD OR CRIMES FOR WHICH YOU COULD BE ARRESTED
(Note all crimes with what, when, all, who and handle by Itsa earlier
similar Itsa.)
26. INSANE ASYLUM HISTORY
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
27. SHOCK TREATMENT HISTORY
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
28. HERE TO BE CURED OF SOMETHING NOT MENTIONED
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
29. UNPAID DEBTS TO ORGS
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
30. KNOWLEDGE OF A CRIME AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
31. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF SCIENTOLOGY WORKED ON EVERYONE
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
32. ANYTHING UPSETTING ABOUT THIS REVIEW
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
33. HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
34. HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
35. HAS ANYTHING BEEN RUSHED
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
36. HAS ANYTHING BEEN MISSED
(Itsa earlier similar Itsa.)
37. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN
(Get what it is and Rehab.)
38. IS A SCIENTOLOGY CONFESSIONAL (SEC CHECK) NOT COMPLETE
(Handle with List LCR Confessional Repair List.)
39. PC STATEMENT OF THE TROUBLE AS IT IS NOW
40. ASSESS 7 SPECIAL CASES:
(a) DOESN'T WANT AUDITING
(b) PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED
(c) HAS NOT HAD AUDITING
(d) SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS
(e) HAS TAKEN DRUGS
(f) FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY
(g) HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES
(h) OUT OF VALENCE
(i) CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY
(j) AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT
(k) AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT, ARC BRK
PTPs W/H
(l) HAS AN ENGRAM EXACTLY MATCHING PT DANGERS
(m) SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL
(Return the folder to C/S, do not indicate the item to the pc
or pre-OT.)
(n) GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING
(o) OVERWHELMED BY AUDITING
(a) is handled as in 4 of the GF.
(c) is handled by Listing and Nulling "Who or what would
prevent auditing?"
(b) & (d) to (h) handled Recall process, 3 flows each to F/N then
engram or chain 3 flows each to F/N.
(i) is handled by Listing and Nulling "What are you trying to
prevent?" by the LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING.
(n) is handled by HCO B 11 April 1970, "Auditing Past
Exterior" procedure. GF-40 is handled as per HCO B 8 April
1970, "GF-40 Handling-Clarification".
(o) handled by a Progress and Advance Program (as per C/S
Series after 2wc to F/N.)
FINISH TA POSITION FINISH TIME
TOTAL TA TOTAL TIME
RECOMMENDATIONS
DATE AUDITOR SIGN
CASE SUPERVISOR
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn Specialists
IMPORTANT
THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN
THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974
Recent intensive investigation into blocks on tech, dissemination and
communication lines uncovered an aberration which is quite widespread and
especially common in society.
Simply stated I found that WHERE VITAL INFORMATION WAS NOT BEING
RELAYED OR WAS HIDDEN OR FALSIFIED, THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE WERE DRAMATIZING
WITHHOLDS.
You can see this in newspapers, government policies, the medical
profession, psychiatry, economics and especially education.
I have for years tried to get to the bottom of why people will not
teach people. It is the single greatest fault in existing culture in my
opinion.
The answer that fits all cases is a failure to relay information,
brief, instruct, train or supervise stemming from a general past and
current OVERT OF WITHHOLDING VITAL INFORMATION. This gives a dramatization
in daily conduct of failing to relay information, brief, instruct, train or
supervise.
And underlying that is the intentional impulse to do so overtly or
covertly in a mistaken attempt to forward their own first dynamic.
RESEARCH
The primary outpoint that led to this conclusion is the premium given
to silence in philosophy and the approval accorded the silent by the
population whereas such people are in fact quite deadly and useless.
It is a generalized dramatization in this society. This would be what
made the society favor the "strong silent type" as a sort of ideal.
All this in a highly technical society is hazardous. A good example is
the current fuel crisis over a supposed scarcity of petroleum fuels for
highly inefficient internal combustion engines while answers in the form of
new fuels and engines are hidden away in vaults by the vested interests.
ORGS
In our organizations this is deadly. It blocks our tech lines in the
Academy and Qual as well as the HGC. It cuts our dissem lines to public via
books, promo, regging, lectures, use of C/F and Addresso and FSMs. It cuts
our comm lines and denies data to higher management.
It winds up in no application of the tech and no results for the
public.
That makes this rundown mandatory for top execs including Flag Reps and
LRH Comms, all Tech and Qual staff and Dissem, Distrib and HCO Dept 2.
PECULIARITY
This mechanism is a peculiar one with its own special twist.
Earlier rundowns did not hit this particular type of overt. It isn't
very visible and doesn't occur in rundowns like L10.
It is not simple withholding information. It is (or once was) the
intentional overt of withholding VITAL information. It would be a very long
chain and would influence general conduct. A bordering chain is withholding
information under torture.
Probably an A=A=A sets in which then totally prohibits some (too many)
people from imparting important data, thus they can't teach, amongst other
things. It has to be fully run out, engrams and all.
THE RUNDOWN
Where staff are concerned, the necessity of delivering this RD reduces
the prerequisites for it to the Drug RD only. It could be done if necessary
where the Drug RD was not yet complete but would have to be verified after
completion of the Drug RD.
Otherwise and for public, this RD belongs on Ex Dn as OCA right-hand
side handling. It would probably fit best before the Multiple E. Purp RD
and the Responsibility RD.
VITAL INFO RD
1. Clear and assess:
VITAL DATA _________
THE TRUTH _________
VITAL INFORMATION _________
KNOWLEDGE _________
Choose the best read as the item.
2. a) L&N "What would happen if you communicated_______?"
b) R3R Quad
3. a) L&N "What problem have you had with_______?"
b) R3R Quad
4. a) Clear and assess:
Withholding (item) under duress. _________
Withholding (item) under torture. _________
Withholding (item) to protect someone. _________
b) R3R Quad
5. a) Clear all words plus fully clear each outpoint with examples
and demos so it's understood.
b) Assess:
Omitted (item). _________
Altered the sequence of (item). _________
Dropped time out of (item). _________
Added falsehoods to (item). _________
Altered the importance of (item). _________
Used (item) to wrong tgt. _________
Assigned the wrong source for (item). _________
Made (item) a contrary fact. _________
Added time to the relay of (item). _________
Added inapplicable data to (item). _________
Incorrectly included other data with (item). _________
Complicated (item). _________
Suppressed (item). _________
In order of reads:
c) R3R Quad
Locate a time when another ______to/for/from (pick which) you.
Locate a time when you______to/for/from another.
Locate a time when another______to/for/from another.
d) L&N "What would be the intention of someone who______?"
e) R3R Quad the intention.
6. a) Assess: Concerning (item) has there been a break in
Affinity _________
Reality _________
Communication _________
Understanding _________
b) R3R Quad the largest read.
c) Reassess ARCU and handle to F/Ning assessment.
7. a) Clear all words, especially assumption and justify and
withholding (in the broad sense).
b) L&N "What assumption would justify withholding (item) ?"
c) R3R Quad the computation.
8. R3R Quad all E. Purps that came up during the RD.
9. R3R Quad all computations that came up during the RD.
SUMMARY
The importance of this RD for Tech and Qual staff and sensitive posts
cannot be over-emphasized.
Although it will be quite popular with the public it is basically
designed for staff on these lines.
The auditors delivering it should themselves have had it. They must
have flawless TRs, be able to make a meter read and must drill the RD in
Qual before attempting to deliver it.
This RD is very powerful. Don't miss on it with careless delivery. Get
it done flawlessly as directed and you will have a resurge on delivery and
dissemination lines and open the door to A GOLDEN ERA OF AUDITING QUALITY
AND RESULTS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF.
LRH:RS:clb.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED assisted by CS-4
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971 R
REVISED 15 OCTOBER 1974
Class IV
Ex Dn Spclst
Requires:
W/C 2
* Rate
Clay PTS RUNDOWN
TRs 4000-9
4000-10
CASES
One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena".
P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he
becomes a Potential Trouble Source.
There are numerous HCO Bs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true
observations and predictions.
The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a
gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS.
S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are
still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without
change.
Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too
frequent case condition can be handled.
WHO DOES IT
Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okays to
Audits.
For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent
Interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it
needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very
honest auditing and competent C/Sing.
DEVELOPMENT
Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively
covered.
The recent wrap-up came about through my OT research in November 1971.
The principal breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate
having known certain people before.
This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people
thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous
characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But
people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running
them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks
through for a stalled Dianetic Case.
In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you
were
" for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain
individuals before this life.
But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and
lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person
before this life.
Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that
life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds.
BREAKDOWN
There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown.
1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs
out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally
familiar with this Rundown.
2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is
a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF
and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the R3
R.
3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left
incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster).
4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a
full Drug Rundown.
There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS
Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the
PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it
really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing
it are especially rough.
Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard
practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with
engram running.
The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted
the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature.
Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int
repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be
gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted.
BEHAVIOR OF RD
Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be
noted on the worksheet.
The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be
sure with an L3B. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have
to work at it. In the PTS RD incidents can "develop". Missing pieces can
appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2
after finishing Fl.
Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown.
And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied
by this Rundown.
END PHENOMENA
There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person
before this life. This is NOT the EP.
A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an
Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its
correction).
THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN
ROLLERCOASTERS.
PARTS
There are four parts to the RD.
(a) Present and past S&Ds. Collect them up, handle each valid item
with R3R Triple, ARC Brk, PTP, W/H and Overts each Triple. If no S&Ds exist
do "3 S&Ds" and R3R and Ruds as above. If no folder, get the pc to tell you
any past S&D items. Follow Ruds with Can't Have/Enforced Hav per HCO B 3
June 72R.
(b) L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or
worried you? Includes father, mother, wife or wives (husband), brothers,
sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents, lovers. Take the BD F/N item. Ask if
the pc has known person before this life. If read, R3R Triple, Ruds &
Overts Triple.
(c) L&N Who have you been after this life? Take the BD F/N item.
Ask if known before. If it so reads, R3R Triple, Ruds & Overts Triple,
Can't Have/Enforced Hav.
(d) L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? To BD
F/N item. R3R Triple, Ruds & Overts Triple, Can't Have/Enforced Hav.
That is the extent of the Rundown.
FLOWS
You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this
fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc.
Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place).
Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others.
If you did Fl R3R as "Locate a time you knew____" you might get to the
pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean
motivator Fl. This would leave the PTS chain partially run.
This is also true of the ruds.
RE-DOs
If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above
should be checked into.
Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4B and L3B.
Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and
handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have
missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such
obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in)
the other person.
Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before.
THE COMMANDS
See 3 S&Ds HCO Bs 13 January 1968 "S&Ds", 19 Jan 68, 16 Aug 69, 14 Jan
68, 28 Nov 67, 10 Nov 67, 9 Nov 67.
The commands and actions of doing 3 S&Ds are DRILL TR 4000-9 & TR 4000-
10 3 S&Ds. HCO B 9 Oct 71, Issue VI.
The following R3R commands are used in every case. Put the person or
place in the blank:
F1. Locate a time when______ did something to you. R3R.
F2. Locate a time when you did something to______. R3R.
F3. Locate a time when______did something to others. R3R.
RUDS
1. Did_____ARC Brk you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
2. Did you ARC Brk_____? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
3. Did_____ARC Brk others? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S.
4. Did_____give you a problem? E/S to F/N.
5. Did you give_____a problem? E/S to F/N.
6. Did_____give others problems? E/S to F/N.
7. Did you withhold anything from_____? E/S to F/N.
8. Did_____withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N.
9. Did_____withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N.
10. Did_____commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N.
11. Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on_____? E/S to F/N.
12. Did_____commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N.
AUDITOR'S LIST OF ITEMS
TO BE RUN
(a) Old S&Ds ___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
New S&Ds ___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
Past PTS Interviews ___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
(b) L&N item ___________________________
(c) L&N item ___________________________
(d) Planets L&N ___________________________
Added Items for PTS Re-do ___________________________
___________________________
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1971, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[See also HCO B 20 January 1972, PTS RD Addition, page 19. The above HCO B
was revised by HCO B 9 December 1971 RA, Revised 21 October 1974, PTS
Rundown, page 338. HCO B 9 October 1 97 1, Issue Vl, mentioned above as
containing the 3 S&Ds Drill was revised by BTB 9 October 1 97 1 RA, Issue
VI, revised 23 February 1975, Level 4 Process Drills, which deleted the 3
S&Ds Drill.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 OCTOBER 1974
Remimeo
Cramming
Officers
IMPORTANT
Cramming Series 14
CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS
A Cramming Officer can fail in his efforts to correct a flubbing staff
member if he tries to cram over out ruds.
Cramming done over an ARC Break, like Auditing, will result in the
person getting worse, more out of comm or misemotional. Cramming a person
over a problem or W/H will produce no change so no correction will occur.
Out ruds are easy to spot. The person with an ARC Break, won't talk or
is misemotional or antagonistic. A problem produces fixated attention that
prevents Cramming from finding the actual area of difficulty. Natter and
1.1 remarks means a withhold.
Recently a musician being crammed kept bringing up a dispatch that he
was in mystery about concerning the group. Every time it was mentioned it
read or BDed yet the Cramming Officer continued "Cramming" him and never
handled it. So no product.
I sat the musician down, told him he was crammed over a problem, the
mystery about the dispatch, cleaned it up by getting the dispatch and
letting him go over it, made sure the problem was handled then found the
area of misunderstood and traced it back to an early age and the Why fell
right out.
And I got the Cramming Officer crammed by the Senior C/S and found her
Why too.
So the moral of the story is DON'T CRAM OVER OUT RUDS.
It is too costly in lost production and flaps.
CRAMMING OFFICER FLUBS
When the Cramming Officer flubs you must get him crammed fast because
he will repeat the error on others and there goes your results.
In such cases, get him crammed immediately by the Qual Sec or Senior
C/S. If it is the Qual Sec who has flubbed, then he is crammed either by
the Senior C/S or the Keeper of Tech.
INCOMPLETE HANDLING
It is often not enough just to correct a Why and do no further handling
in Cramming. Most Cramming Cycles reveal a broader area of situation which
must also be handled.
An example is the Auditor who flubs on an L4BR and during the Cramming
reveals he never really listened to the key SHSBC L&N tapes.
The Cramming Officer who does not also program the Auditor for a review of
those tapes would not have fully corrected that Auditor. You could
accurately predict future L&N flubs and pc upsets.
A subsequent program such as the one above would count as an additional
Cramming Cycle for the Cramming Officer, or a Retread if lengthy and would
count as additional points.
Therefore the maxim of Cramming is:
HANDLE THE HELL OUT OF IT.
Honest correction must be fully and completely done for the sake of the
public and the org as well as the staff member.
SUMMARY
Cramming success depends on not Cramming over out ruds and on fully
handling all areas of confusion or weakness.
Follow these operating rules and you will enjoy rave results and real
correction.
And your org stats will soar.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 OCTOBER 1974
Remimeo
URGENT
THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS
ON VITAL INFORMATION LINES
I have recently unearthed a widespread aberration that underlies the
withhold or obstruction of vital information and wanted to warn you to be
on the lookout for it.
It is, simply stated, DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS.
This is not just the person with withholds, this is the person who
DRAMATIZES withholds by preventing the relay, exposure or free distribution
of vital information.
To DRAMATIZE means to act under the influence of past incidents as
dictated by those incidents in the bank. The guy is replaying something now
that happened in the past, out of its time and context and out of his
control. A person dramatizing withholds would be acting out withholding
information now, when the actual withholds or incidents of withholding are
in the past.
VITAL INFORMATION
Vital information is vital because survival depends on it. Examples
include: HCO Bs, HCO PLs, books, tapes, course checksheets and packs, hats,
OEC Volumes, LRH EDs and FOs and other issues, Flag programs and EDs,
stats, weekly reports, compliance reports, situation reports, CSWs, evals,
even dispatches that contain important information that must be known.
Also, an org requires other vital data like accurate C/F and
Addresso's, up-to-date files, broad, hard-sell promotion and magazines,
accurate accounts files and records, monthly statements, tech data that
gives pc and student results, Word Clearing and Cramming results, a Qual
Library, broad public dissemination and promotion to name a few.
Data that is VITAL must be relayed, must be made known without alteris
or barriers. You can't survive without it.
THE DRAMATIZATION
There are probably as many different ways to dramatize withholds as
there are people who do it. You should know of the main ones I've come
across lately.
First is a failure to relay. This can be simply not routing on a mail
pack or dispatch, not sending out the org's letters or mailings,
backlogging Mimeo so new issues don't get seen, having poor tape recorders
in the Academy or simply refusing to train or process public and staff.
A deadly one is losing tech personnel or not recruiting them. That way
nobody is there to relay the Tech to the students and pcs. A few orgs are
very busy doing that one.
Never making the Auditors and C/Ses and Supervisors do their daily TRs,
High Crimes and training is another one. It denies the tech people data
they need and also denies Standard Tech to the public especially in terms
of results on pcs.
Not Hatting or Cramming staff is another one. So is falsifying stats,
not promoting, failure to sell training, not calling paid up public in for
service, not reporting what is happening in the org.
When you see this happening WATCH OUT. Someone is dramatizing withholds
and withholding vital information.
The worst example of course would be not to have an org there at all.
AN ORG'S MAIN PRODUCT
The main product of an org is Knowledge, and the results obtained with
it.
Any post in an org contributes to this product. It is the most valuable
product we have to exchange with the public.
Knowledge and its results are what public and staff want. It is
valuable because without it there can be no survival.
REMEDY
The Vital Information Rundown HCO B 6 Oct 74 is the remedy for the
dramatization of withholds.
Train your Auditors on it thoroughly and get it delivered where you are
having this problem.
If you don't have any Auditors to deliver it or no one to train them
you have already been hit by this dramatization.
Your only hope is to get an Auditor and train him and get it delivered.
YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTION IS TO OPEN UP YOUR VITAL INFORMATION LINES NOW.
SUMMARY
Look over your org and see if this mechanism has affected your
operation.
Don't tolerate it. Expose it and relay the vital information.
DON'T PERMIT THE DRAMATIZATION OF WITHHOLDS TO BLOCK THE FLOW OF VITAL
INFORMATION.
Your survival depends on it.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971 RA
Remimeo REVISED 21 OCTOBER 1974
Class IV
Ex Dn Spclst
Requires:
WC 2 PTS RUNDOWN
* Rate
Clay
References:
BPL 31 May 71 RA "PTS and SP Detection, Routing and
Handling
Checksheet"
HCO B 20 Jan 72 "PTS RD Addition"
HCO B 16 Apr 72 "PTS RD Correction List"
HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76, "C/Sing a PTS RD"
HCO B 3 June 72R "PTS RD, Final Step"
HCO B 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79, "PTS Interviews"
HCO B 10 Aug 73 "PTS Handling"
HCO B 9 Nov 67 "Review Auditors"
HCO B 14 Jan 68 "S&D Type 'S' "
HCO B 19 Jan 68 "S&Ds By Button"
HCO B 16 Aug 69 "Handling Illness in Scientology"
CASES
One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena".
P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he
becomes a Potential Trouble Source.
There are numerous HCO Bs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true
observations and predictions.
The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a
gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS.
S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are
still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without
change.
Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too
frequent case condition can be handled.
WHO DOES IT
Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okays to
Audits.
For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent
interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it
needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very
honest auditing and competent C/Sing.
DEVELOPMENT
Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively
covered.
The recent wrap-up came about through my OT research in November 1971.
The principal breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate
having known certain people before.
This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people thinking
this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous characters
so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But people who don't
go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running them as "imaginary"
as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks through for a stalled
Dianetic Case.
In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you
were
" for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain
individuals before this life.
But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and
lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person
before this life.
Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that
life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds.
BREAKDOWN
There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown.
1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs
out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally
familiar with this Rundown.
2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is
a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF
and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the
R3R.
3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left
incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster).
4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a
full Drug Rundown.
There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS
Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the
PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it
really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing
it are especially rough.
Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard
practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with
engram running.
The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted
the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature.
Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int
repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be
gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted.
With HCO B C/S Series 93, "New Grade Chart", the PTS RD is done as part
of Ex Dn after a full Drug RD and Exp Grade IV.
BEHAVIOR OF RD
Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be
noted on the worksheet.
The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be
sure with an L3RD. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have
to work at it. In the PTS RD incidents can "develop". Missing pieces can
appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2
after finishing F1.
Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown. And
case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied by
this Rundown.
END PHENOMENA
There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person
before this life. This is NOT the EP.
A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an
Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its
correction).
THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN
ROLLERCOASTERS.
FLOWS
You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this
fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc.
Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place).
Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others.
If you did Fl R3R as "Locate a time you knew____" you might get to the
pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean
motivator Fl. This would leave the PTS chain partially run.
This is also true of the ruds.
RE-DOs
If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above
should be checked into.
Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4BR and L3RD.
Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and
handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have
missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such
obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in)
the other person.
Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before.
SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
Here are the issues that directly cover the Rundown.
HCO B 9 Dec 71RA "PTS Rundown"
HCO B 20 Jan 72 "PTS RD Addition"
HCO B 16 Apr 72 "PTS RD Correction List"
HCO B 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76, "C/Sing a PTS RD"
HCO B 3 June 72R "PTS RD, Final Step"
HCO B 19 Jan 68 "S&Ds By Button"
HCO B 16 Aug 69 "Handling Illness in Scientology"
HCO B 20 Apr 72 Issue II, C/S Series 78
HCO B 15 Dec 68R "L4BR"
HCO B 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79, "PTS Interviews"
HCO B 10 Aug 73 "PTS Handling"
THE RUNDOWN
A. PAST S&Ds:
1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been
verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder.
2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads handle
per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check for
validity.
3. R3R Triple the item using these commands:
F1 Locate a time when ______did something to you. R3 R.
F2 Locate a time when you did something to______ R3R.
F3 Locate a time when______did something to others. R3 R.
4. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item using these commands:
(a) Did______ARC Brk you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(b) Did you ARC Brk______? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(c) Did______ARC Brk others? ARCU CDEINR.
ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S.
(d) Did______give you a problem? E/S to F/N.
(e) Did you give______a problem? E/S to F/N.
(f) Did______give others problems? E/S to F/N.
(g) Did you withhold anything from ______? E/S to F/N.
(h) Did______withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N.
(i) Did______withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N.
(j) Did______commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N.
(k) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on______? E/S to
F/N.
(l) Did______commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N.
5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforced Hav" with these steps:
(a) Clear "can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING
TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT
WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an
example or two.
(b) Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as
motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three
terminal to others, others to terminal (four flows of two
commands each).
(c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective
Havingness should be run.
THE COMMANDS:
F1 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you?
2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want?
F2 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)?
2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it)
didn't want?
F3 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others?
2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want?
F3A 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)?
2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it)
didn't want?
--OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS--
6. Handle all past S&D items per above steps.
B. PAST PTS INTERVIEWS:
7. Collect up all past PTS Interview items (which should have
already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups).
8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so reads handle as
below.
9. R3R Triple the item.
10. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item.
11. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav.
12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS Interview items.
C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds):
13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCO B 16 Aug 69, "Handling Illness in
Scientology", assessment and 3 L&Ns.
14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads.
15. R3R Triple the item.
16. Triple Ruds and Overts on the item.
17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav.
18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other 2 items if valid.
D. TROUBLED/WORRIED:
19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or
worried you? to BD F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother, wife
or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents,
lovers.)
20. Check item for known before, if it so reads:
21. R3R Triple.
22. Triple Ruds and Overts.
23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav.
E. BEEN AFTER:
24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item.
25. Check known before and if it reads:
26. R3R Triple.
27. Triple Ruds and Overts.
28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav.
F. PLANETS:
29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N
item.
30. R3R Triple.
31. Triple Ruds and Overts.
32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav.
33. D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be
sure the person is now all right (not PTS).
REPAIR
Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BR, L3RD, GF Method 5
and handle, C/S 53 if necessary.
A really big snarl-up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with HCO
B 16 Apr 72, "PTS RD Correction List".
If pc gets ill or rollercoasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD
Correction List HCO B 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared
up.
SUMMARY
The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each
aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled
thoroughly before it is delivered.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1971 � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The 15 October 1974 revision which preceded the above was basically the
same text as the original HCO B 9 December 1971, except that it added the
Can't Have/Enforced Have step after ruds and it changed the 2WC questions
to L&N questions on the Troubled/Worried, Been After and Planets steps.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Ex Dn Spclsts
Class IVs
Qual ROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS
HCO Dept 3
A lot of controversy has shown up this year on the subject of R/Ses and
R/Sers. I thought I'd better write an issue on the subject to clarify it.
The research on this was actually done years ago.
R/Ses
An R/S or Rock Slam is defined as a crazy irregular slashing motion of
the needle. It can be as narrow as one inch or more than a full dial in
width, but it's crazy! It slams back and forth. It is actually quite
startling to see one. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER METER PHENOMENA.
Recently Auditors arriving on Flag were found not to know what an R/S
was but were calling Dirty Needles, Dirty Reads, Rocket Reads, even Ticks
as R/Ses. That comes from never having been trained on what an R/S is and
never having seen one. R/SES ARE UNIQUE IN APPEARANCE.
Actually this is quite a serious matter because pcs get labelled as
R/Sers and get run on Evil Purposes connected with this "R/S" that isn't
one. You can really foul up a pc that way, believe me.
A real R/S also has a crazy meter. It doesn't read then it does. This
happens because the meter reads just below a pc's reality. If the pc has no
reality on the subject, then the meter won't read.
So you get a faulty meter. It doesn't read on what it should, then it
reads, then it doesn't.
ROCK SLAMMERS
In a group of 400, the actual percentage of R/Sers is low. It's about 8
in 400, or 2-21/2%. Those figures should seem familiar. They are the same
percentage for SPs. And that gives you a clue to the identification of an
R/Ser.
Where requirements for Scn or SO Orgs have been established for R/Ses
they apply to the 2-21/2% of real R/Sers as these are also considered
security risks for staff purposes.
These people can of course be salvaged as pcs using Expanded Dianetics.
Letting them on staff could be disastrous, however.
CHECKLIST
To assist you in the identification of R/Sers I have done a complete
checklist of characteristics and their references.
This checklist is to be used whenever a C/S is called upon to inspect a
folder to determine whether a person is an R/Ser.
1. The R/Ses reported are actual R/Ses and not some other read or broken
meter leads, a dusty or worn TA or Trim "pot", or cans in contact with
metal such as rings, bracelets, etc.
Ref: E-Meter Essentials; The Book of E-Meter Drills; The Book
Introducing the E-Meter; HCO B 8 Nov 62, "Somatics-How to Tell
Terminals and Opposition Terminals", pp. 2 & 4; HCO B 6 Dec 62, "R2-10,
R2-12, 3GAXX"; BTB 14 Jan 63, "Rings Causing 'Rock Slams' "; HCO B
False TA Series 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72, 18 Feb 72, 29 Feb
72R, 23 Nov 73.
2. R/Ses have to do with Scientology or one or more areas of the old
Scientology List One found in The Book of E-Meter Drills.
Ref: The Book of E-Meter Drills; HCO B 5 Dec 62, "2-12, 3GAXX, 3-21
and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment"; HCO B 23 Nov 62, "Urgent-Routine
Two-Twelve"; HCO B 12 Sept 62, "Security Checks Again".
3. Pc is Slow or No Case Gain. Also is in a chronically nattery or
critical state.
Ref: HCO B 23 Nov 62, "Routine Two-Twelve"; HCO B 5 Dec 62, "2-12,
3GAXX, 3-21 and Routine 2-10 Modern Assessment"; HCO B 6 Dec 62, "R2-
10, R2-12, 3GAXX"; HCO B 28 Nov 70, C/S Series 22, "Psychosis"; BPL 31
May 71RA, PTS/SP Checksheet and mat'ls.
4. Pc chronically ill or who acts most "PTS". This can be suppressed and
hidden from view, however.
Ref: HCOPL 15 Nov 70R, "HCO and Confessionals"; HCOB 28 Nov 70, C/S
Series 22, "Psychosis"; PTS/SP Pack.
5. Pc's product is consistently an overt act and his activities
destructive to others.
Ref: HCOPL 14 Nov 70, Org Series 14, "The Product as an Overt Act";
PTS/SP Pack; HCO Manual of Justice.
6. Pc's behavior or condition or OCA classifies as psychotic.
Ref: HCO B Ex Dn Series and tapes; HCO B 28 Nov 70.
Where the answers to this checklist are yes you have an R/Ser. HCO
handles and Qual programs them for rehabilitation.
PCs WHO R/S
Pcs who R/S are given Ex Dn. This does not change even though the pc is
not an R/Ser. See HCO B C/S Series 93.
Where a pc R/Ses he will have Evil Purposes and be on a succumb as a
result. R/Ses indicate an area of psychosis which will ruin the pc's life
if allowed to go unhandled.
SUMMARY
This HCO B in no way changes Ex Dn as a requirement for R/Ses or makes
it ok not to handle them.
Staff concerned must be able to identify an R/Ser which is different
from someone with an R/S.
I thought you should have this data and hope it clears up any remaining
confusion in the area.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1974RA
REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1974
REVISED 1 NOVEMBER 1974
Ex Dn (Changes are in this type sty/e,
Spclsts items 17A, B, C & D)
M7/4 *rate
Clay Demo
THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1973!
THE INTROSPECTION RD
(Changes HCO B 23 Jan 1974,
"The Introspection RD".)
I have made a technical breakthrough which possibly ranks with the
major discoveries of the Twentieth Century. It is certainly the greatest
advancement of 1973 and is now being released after a final wrap-up of
research. It is called the Introspection Rundown.
The purpose of the Introspection RD is to locate and correct those
things which cause a person to fixate his attention inwardly, on himself or
his bank. This RD extroverts the person so that he can see his environment
and therefore handle and control it.
RESEARCH
In 1970 the actual cause of PSYCHOSIS was isolated (as given in HCO B
C/S Series 22, "Psychosis", 28 November 1970). In the ensuing years this
has been proven beyond doubt to be totally correct.
But what is a psychotic break?
Man has never been able to solve the psychotic break. In fact, human
beings are actually afraid of a person in a psychotic break and in
desperation turn to psychiatry to handle.
Psychiatry, desperate in its turn, without effective tech, resorts to
barbarities such as heavy drugs, ice picks, electric and insulin shock
which half kill the person and only suppress him. The fact remains there
has never been a cure for the psychotic break until now.
The key is WHAT CAUSED THE PERSON TO INTROSPECT BEFORE THE PSYCHOTIC
BREAK.
The breakthrough was made on a person who, after a series of wrong
indications, went into a full-blown psychotic break-violence, destruction
and all.
The psychiatrist at this point would have sharpened up his ice pick,
filled his syringes with the most powerful (and deadly) drugs he could find
and turned up the volts. His "handling" would have been a final destruction
of the individual.
What was done was an auditor went into the room, sat the person down
and corrected the last severe point of wrong indication. Subsequent times
of wrong indication in his life were cleared up, the person came out of the
psychotic break and into p.t.
THIS MEANS THE LAST REASON TO HAVE PSYCHIATRY AROUND IS GONE.
The psychotic break, the last of the "unsolvable" conditions that can
trap a person, has been solved.
And it's quite simple, really.
THEORY
Def. INTROSPECTION: "(L. from introspicere, to look within) a looking
into one's own mind, feelings, reactions, etc.; observation and analysis of
oneself." Webster's New World Dictionary.
Def. INTROVERSION: "(from intro- + L. vertere, to turn) 2.... a
tendency to direct one's interest upon oneself rather than upon external
objects or events." Webster's New World Dictionary.
The essence of the Introspection RD is looking for and correcting all
those things which CAUSED the person to look inward worriedly and wrestle
with the mystery of some incorrectly designated error. The result is
continual inward looking or self auditing without relief or end.
In a normal person this becomes a diminished activity, unhappiness or
illness. In an R/Ser this becomes insanity and a psychotic break occurs at
the last severe point of wrong indication.
The pc who originates to the Examiner about his case or writes notes to
the C/S or auditor is introverted and should have this RD.
AUDITOR TRAINING
Auditors selected to do this RD must have recently done a HARD TRs
Course and the Anti-Q&A materials.
They must be able to recognize a ROCK SLAM, which is a particular E-
Meter phenomenon. They must be Class IV Expanded Dianetics auditors of
proven skill on routine cases. They must not themselves be R/Sers. (The
last requisite is waived in a self-salvage co-audit group where all R/S.)
They need flawless TRs, no Q&A. This Rundown is very simple but cannot
be flubbed, as that will compound the errors and cause further
introspection in the pc. It is better not to deliver this RD than to flub
any part of it. C/Ses take note. It is an Ethics Offense to attempt this
Rundown without the auditor having done the prerequisite training and a
further offense for an auditor to flub on it.
STEPS OF THE RD
(Steps 0 and 00 are for a person
in a psychotic break, not a
normal person.)
Put this checklist on inside front cover of folder as a pgm.
0. On a person in a psychotic break isolate the person wholly with
all attendants completely muzzled (no speech). _________
00. Give Vitamins (B complex, including niacinamide) and minerals
(calcium and magnesium) to build the person up. _________
* * *
1. Locate by study or research of the person's case or via associates
or 2-way comm the last severe point of introversion just prior to
the current psychotic break or illness. There may be several severe
points of introversion, prior or subsequent to the one that triggered
the break or illness. These points are identified by their upsetting
or
worrisome effect on the pc. Each is noted down for handling.
_________
2. On each point, indicate the substance of it as a point of
introversion to
release the By-Passed Charge. Each should BD and F/N. First point
indicated to F/N. _________
2B. Second point indicated to F/N. _________
2C. Third point indicated to F/N. _________
In the case of an out-list, the fact of a wrong item would be
indicated and the list corrected by the Laws of L&N.
3. Get the wording of each point stated by the pc as an item (i.e.,
"What would you call such an incident?") and its read and
handle by 2wc each flow E/Sim to F/N. First point 2wc'd F-l 230
to F/N. _________
3A. Second point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _________
3B. Third point 2wc'd F-1230 to F/N. _________
4. Verify/Correct all L&N lists. _________
5. Verify/Correct all Why "lists", PTS Interviews, 3 May PLs per
C/S Series 78.
6. R3R Quad item found in No. 3. ("Locate an incident where......")
_________
6A. L&N for the Intention behind the subject in No. 3. Verify Q for
read before listing. _________
6B. R3R Quad the Intention. _________
6C. R3R Quad, L&N Intention & R3R Quad any other items found
(No. 3A, 3B, etc.). _________
7. Clear the words "Introversion", "Introspection", "Extroversion".
_________
8. ARC BREAKS HANDLING. _________
8A. 2wc Has another ARC Broken you? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. _________
8B. 2wc Have you ARC Broken another? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.
_________
8C. 2wc Have others ARC Broken anyone else? ARCU CDEINR E/S
to F/N. _________
8D. 2wc Have you ARC Broken yourself? ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.
_________
8E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had an ARC Break when
you didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC Break
when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had an ARC Break
when he didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8H. 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had an ARC Break
when you didn't? E/S to F/N. _________
8I. R3R Quad the item. _________
8J. L&N for the Intention behind "the forcing of upsets on people
who don't have them". _________
8K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 8J. _________
9. WITHHOLDS HANDLING. _________
9A. 2wc Are you withholding something from anyone? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
9B. 2wc Is anyone else withholding something from you? E/Sim to
F/N. _________
9C. 2wc Are others withholding something from anyone else? E/Sim
to F/N. _________
9D. 2wc Are you withholding something from yourself? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
9E. 2wc Has anyone demanded W/Hs you didn't have? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
9F. 2wc Have you demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't have?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
9G. 2wc Have others demanded withholds of anyone else they didn't
have? E/Sim to F/N. _________
9H. 2wc Have you demanded W/Hs from yourself that you didn't have?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
9I. R3R Quad "demanded non-existent W/Hs from ......". _________
9J. L&N, Clear Q thoroughly and verify for read first, what
purpose would be behind "the demanding of non-existent
W/Hs from others"? _________
9K. R3R Quad the item in No. 9J. _________
10. PROBLEMS HANDLING. _________
10A. 2wc Has another given you a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10B. 2wc Have you given another a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10C. 2wc Have others given a problem to anyone else? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
10D. 2wc Have you given yourself a problem? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10E. 2wc Has anyone ever made you feel you had a problem when
you didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10F. 2wc Have you ever made anyone else feel he had a problem when
he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10G. 2wc Have others ever made anyone else feel he had a problem
when he didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10H. 2wc Have you ever made yourself feel you had a problem when
you didn't? E/Sim to F/N. _________
10I. R3R Quad the item. _________
10J. L&N for the Intention behind "the giving of problems to people
that don't belong to them". _________
10K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 10J.
11. OVERTS HANDLING. _________
11A. 2wc Has anyone else committed overts on you? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
11B. 2wc Have you committed overts on anyone else? Get what, E/Sim
to F/N. _________
11C. 2wc Have others committed overts on anyone else? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
11D. 2wc Have you committed any overts on yourself? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
11E. 2wc Has anyone ever accused you of something you didn't do?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11F. 2wc Have you ever accused anyone else of something he didn't do?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11G. 2wc Have others ever accused anyone else of something he didn't
do? E/Sim to F/N. _________
11H. 2wc Have you ever accused yourself of something you didn't do?
E/Sim to F/N. _________
11I. R3R Quad the item. _________
11J. L&N for the Intention behind "the accusing of someone of non-
existent overts". _________
11K. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 11J. _________
12. NOT SAYING. _________
12A. 2wc Are you not saying something about someone else or
something? Get what, E/Sim to F/N. _________
12B. 2wc Is anyone not saying something about you? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12C. 2wc Are others not saying something about anyone else? E/Sim
to F/N. _________
12D. 2wc Are you not saying something about yourself? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12E. 2wc Has anyone not accepted your W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _________
12F. 2wc Have you not accepted someone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12G. 2wc Have others not accepted anyone else's W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N.
_________
12H. 2wc Have you not accepted your own W/Hs? E/Sim to F/N. _________
12I. R3R Quad "W/Hs weren't accepted". _________
12J. L&N Intention behind "the rejecting of others' W/Hs". _________
12K. R3 R Quad the Intention, in No. 12J. _________
13. FALSE INCIDENTS HANDLING. _________
13A. 2wc Has anyone ever asked you for things that didn't exist? E/S
to F/N. _________
13B. 2wc Have you ever asked anyone else for things that didn't exist?
E/S to F/N. _________
13C. 2wc Have others ever asked anyone else for things that didn't
exist? E/S to F/N. _________
13D. 2wc Have you ever asked yourself for things that didn't exist? E/S
to F/N. _________
13E. R3R Quad the item. _________
13F. L&N for the Intention behind "the demanding of false incidents
from others". _________
13G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 13F. _________
14. PTS HANDLING. _________
14A. 2wc Has anyone given you a false assignment that you were being
done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14B. 2wc Have you given anyone a false assignment that he was being
done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14C. 2wc Have others given anyone else a false assignment that they were
being done in? E/Sim to F/N. _________
14D. 2wc Have you given yourself a false assignment that you were being
done in? E/S to F/N. _________
14E. R3R Quad the item. _________
14F. L&N for the Intention behind "giving others a false assignment that
they were being done in". _________
14G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 14F. _________
14H. 2wc Has anyone been doing you in? E/S to F/N. _________
14I. 2wc Have you been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _________
14J. 2wc Have others been doing anyone else in? E/S to F/N. _________
14K. 2wc Have you been doing yourself in? E/S to F/N. _________
15. FALSE INTERROGATION HANDLING. _________
15A. 2wc Has anyone ever interrogated you for no reason? E/S to F/N.
_________
15B. 2wc Have you ever interrogated anyone else for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
15C. 2wc Have others ever interrogated anyone else for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
15D. 2wc Have you ever had yourself interrogated for no reason? E/S
to F/N. _________
15E. R3R Quad the item. _________
15F. L&N for the Intention behind "the false interrogating of others" .
_________
15G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 15F. _________
16. FALSE INVALIDATION HANDLING. _________
16A. 2wc Has anyone ever heavily invalidated you unjustly? E/S to F/N.
_________
16B. 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly? E/S to
F/N. _________
16C. 2wc Have others ever heavily invalidated anyone else unjustly? E/S
to F/N. _________
16D. 2wc Have you ever heavily invalidated yourself unjustly? E/S to F/N.
_________
16E. R3R Quad the item. _________
16F. L&N for the Intention behind "the unjust invalidating of others"
_________
16G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 16F. _________
17. FALSE VALIDATION HANDLING. _________
17A. 2wc Has another ever validated you for something you didn't
deserve? E/S to F/N. _________
17B. 2wc Have you ever validated anyone else for something he didn't
deserve? E/S to F/N. _________
17C. 2wc Have others ever validated anyone else for something they
didn't deserve? E/S to F/N. _________
17D. 2wc Have you ever validated yourself for something you didn't
deserve? E/S to F/N. _________
17E. R3R Quad the item. _________
17F. L&N for the Intention behind "the false validating of others".
_________
17G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 17F. _________
18. "HIT" FOR NO REASON. _________
18A. 2wc Has anyone "hit" you too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N.
_________
18B. 2wc Have you "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N.
_________
18C. 2wc Have others "hit" anyone else too hard for no reason? E/S to F/N.
_________
18D. 2wc Have you gotten yourself "hit" too hard for no reason? E/S to
F/N. _________
18E. R3R Quad the item. _________
18F. L&N for the Intention behind "the 'hitting' of others unfairly".
_________
18G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 18F. _________
19. INVALIDATED BEINGNESS HANDLING. _________
19A. 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned who you were?
E/S to F/N. _________
19B. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's identity?
E/S to F/N. _________
19C. 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's identity?
E/S to F/N. _________
19D. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your identity?
E/S to F/N. _________
19E. R3R Quad the item. _________
19F. L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of others' identity".
_________
19G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 19F. _________
20. INVALIDATED INTENTIONS HANDLING.
20A. 2wc Has anyone ever challenged or questioned your intentions? E/S
to F/N. _________
20B. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned anyone else's intentions?
E/S to F/N. _________
20C. 2wc Have others ever challenged or questioned anyone else's
intentions?
E/S to F/N. _________
20D. 2wc Have you ever challenged or questioned your own intentions?
E/S to F/N. _________
20E. R3R Quad "misinterpreted intentions". _________
20F. L&N for the Intention behind "the invalidating of the intentions of
others". _________
20G. R3R Quad the Intention, in No. 20F. _________
21. OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS. _________
An HC List could be added here if the pc's "think" is still weird.
NOTE: ITEMS THAT DON'T READ WON'T RUN. DON'T RUN OR LIST Q's THAT DON'T
READ OR YOU'LL REINTROVERT THE PC.
Frequent D of P Interview is vital whenever the case looks like it is
not rapidly progressing. Also a quick assessment may be needed as a
separate action to isolate possible charged areas of introspection.
At any time after Step 2 Objective Havingness should be done at session
end. If one of the items in Steps 3-20 turns out to be false the pc will
introvert further. In such a case indicate the fact of it having been
unnecessary and get an F/N. Then run Objective Havingness. If the TA goes
high (or low) and won't come into range, assess a C/S 53RH and handle.
In the case of a pc in a psychotic break, the C/S would have to locate
the last severe wrong indication, indicate the fact to the pc and get it
corrected (as with a wrong item) as the first action.
EXTROVERSION
Def. EXTROVERSION: ". . . Means nothing more than being able to look
outward ...." "An extroverted personality is one who is capable of looking
around the environment ...." "A person who is capable of looking at the
world around him and seeing it quite real and quite bright is of course in
a state of extroversion." (Problems of Work.)
The end phenomena of the Introspection RD is the person extroverted, no
longer looking inward worriedly in a continuous self-audit without end.
The EP on a person in a psychotic break is the end of the psychotic
break.
The RD is very simple and its results are magical in effectiveness.
Flubs can wreck it so don't permit them.
You have in your hands the tool to take over mental therapy in full.
You need not fear the insane or the psychotic break any longer.
Here also is the cure for the continual self-auditing pc who is dug
into his bank. It works on all pcs in fact with rave results.
Do it flawlessly and we all win.
THIS PLANET IS OURS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ams.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Additional data can be found in HCO B 20 February 1974, Introspection RD-
Additional Actions, page 260- HCO B 6 March 1974, Introspection RD-Second
Addition-information to C/Ses-Fixated Attention, page 262; and HCO B 20
April 1974, Introspection RD-Third Addition-Additional Introspection RD
Steps, page 295.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
DRUGS, MORE ABOUT
Reference: HCO B of 28 August 1968,
Issue II, "Drugs".
WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS
The most wretched part of coming off hard drugs is the reaction called
"withdrawal symptoms". People go into convulsions.
These are so severe that the addict becomes very afraid of them and so
remains on drugs. The reaction can also produce death.
In the reference HCO Bulletin above, B1 is mentioned as a means of
easing convulsions.
Actually, practice since 1968 has shown that "Objective TRs", a
Scientology process described in detail in HCO Bs 11 June 1957, "Training
and CCH Processes", 15 July 1971, C/S Series 48R, "Drug Handling" and BTB
25 Oct 1971R, Issue II, "The Special Drug Rundown", handle withdrawal
symptoms when properly used. Great success has been achieved with them.
There is another supplementary way of handling withdrawal symptoms.
This does not replace "Objective TRs" and at this writing is theoretical,
being in a research phase. But so terrible can be withdrawal symptoms and
so lacking in success has the medical and psychiatric field been, that the
data should be released.
Muscular spasms are caused by lack of Calcium.
Nervous reactions are diminished by Magnesium.
Calcium does not go into solution in the body and is not utilized
unless it is in an acid.
Magnesium is alkaline.
Working on this in 1973, for other uses than drug reactions, I found
the means of getting Calcium into solution in the body, along with
Magnesium so that the results of both could be achieved.
This was the "Cal-Mag Formula".
CAL-MAG FORMULA
1. Put one level tablespoon of Calcium Gluconate in a normal sized
glass.
2. Add 1/2 level teaspoon of Magnesium Carbonate.
3. Add I tablespoon of cider vinegar (at least 5% acidity).
4. Stir it well.
5. Add 1/2 glass of boiling water and stir until all the powder is
dissolved and the liquid is clear. (If this doesn't occur it could be
from poor grade or old Magnesium Carbonate.)
6. Fill the remainder of glass with lukewarm or cold water and cover.
They will stay good for 2 days.
It can be made wrongly so that it does not dissolve. Variations from
the above produce an unsuccessful mix that can taste pretty horrible.
Anything from 1 to 3 glasses of this a day, with or after meals,
REPLACES ANY TRANQUILIZER. It does not produce the drugged effects of
tranquilizers (which are quite deadly).
The application to handle muscular spasms and tics is now quite well
established.
Using this to combat withdrawal symptoms is experimental.
The theory is that withdrawal symptoms are muscular spasms.
The matter should be given tests where persons suffering from
withdrawal symptoms are available.
This does not supplant "Objective TRs". These work.
But it may be that "Cal-Mag" would assist those suffering where no
competent auditing is available.
As Calcium and Magnesium are minerals, not drugs, they form no barrier
to auditing.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RA
(Cancels HCO B 24 Nov 73, Rev. 30 Aug 74)
Revised & Reissued 12 November 1974
Remimeo
C/S Series 53RI
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down
into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal
range to get pc's case handled better.
_________________________________PC Name________________________ Date
1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the
items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F,, LFBD [to
what TA], speeded rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RH should be
reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment.
A. Interiorization _________ Problems _________
Went in _________ Protest _________
Go in _________ Don't like it _________
Can't get in _________ Audited over out ruds _________
Want to get out _________ Feel sad _________
Kicked out of spaces _________ Rushed _________
Can't go _________ Tired _________
ARC Brk _________
B. List errors _________ Upset _________
Overlisting _________ Can't get it _________
Wrong items
Upset with giving _________ D Drugs _________
items to auditor _________ LSD _________
Wrong Why _________ Alcohol _________
Wrong Indication _________ Pot _________
Wrong PTS Item _________ Medicine _________
C. Some sort of W/H _________ E. Engram in restimulation _________
Are you withholding Same engram run twice _________
something _________ Can't see engrams too
Is another withholding well _________
something from you _________ Invisible _________
Are others withholding Black _________
something from others _________ Loss _________
Has another committed Lost _________
overts on you _________
Have you committed F. Same thing run twice _________
any overts _________ Same action done by
Have others committed another auditor _________
overts on others _________
Not saying _________
G. Doing something with L. PTS _________
mind between sessions _________ Suppressed _________
Some other practice _________
M. Something went on too
H. Word Clearing errors _________ long _________
Study errors _________ Went on by a release
point _________
I. False TA _________ Overrun _________
Wrong sized cans _________ Auditor kept on going _________
Tired hands _________ Over-repair _________
Dry hands or feet _________ Puzzled why auditor
Wet hands or feet _________ keeps on _________
Loosens can grip _________ Stops _________
Wrong hand cream _________
N. Something else _________
J. Auditor overwhelming _________ Physically ill _________
Feel attacked _________
Something wrong with O. Repairing a TA that
F/Ns _________ isn't high _________
Overrun F/Ns _________ Repairing a TA that
Missed F/N _________ isn t low _________
Items really didn't read _________ Faulty Meter
_________
Bad auditing _________ Nothing wrong _________
Incomplete actions _________
P. False Exam Report _________
K. Can't have _________ WAITED at Exam _________
Low havingness _________ Upset by Examiner _________
Invalidation _________
Evaluation _________
Couldn't get auditing _________
Interruptions _________
2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show
where mass lies.
A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int
RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71R, Revised 14
May 74.)
If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD
providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R.
B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You
can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong
Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78.
C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more
than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the
others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for
each or 18 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On
out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RR HCO B 30 June 71,
Revised 13 Jan 72.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk
of long duration.)
D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per
C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has
had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle.
E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to do
on L3RD.
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If Yogi or Mystic exercises or some such
2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before
that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List
to the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb
72,18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up
the bypassed charge with (I ) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b)
F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to
F/N. (3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through
an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be
obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items
are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or
retread.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow, if qualified).
N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per I
above.
P. INDICATE and 2wc to F/N.
General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as
nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to
handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return
to the C/S.
Revised by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt jh
Copyright � 1973, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Tech
Qual Refers to HCO PL 15 Nov 74,
ARC Brk Reg "CFs, ARC Breaks in"
ARC Brk Auditor
Tours
STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST
TO BE DONE ONLY BY AN AUDITOR WHO
CAN MAKE PREPARED LISTS READ.
This list is for use by ARC Brk Regs and Auditors, Tours personnel,
Tech and Qual when recovering blown Students or fixing up blowy Students or
Students in trouble or Students who failed in practice.
By "blown Students" we mean Students who have left the org incomplete
on their course, Students who have ceased their studies and are in the org,
Students who have not gone on to their next service, staff who do not
attend or have stopped going to study for any reason or Auditors in the
field who have failed in practice.
ASSESSMENT
This list can be assessed Method 3 or Method 5 depending on the
severity of the upset.
The EP is a Student who is no longer upset or blowy and ready to return
to his service or course and does.
1. THERE WERE MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS. _________
(Find and clear them, each to F/N.)
2. NO HELP OR WORD CLEARING FROM THE SUPERVISOR. _________
(2wc which, if Wd Clg find out where he was having trouble and
use WC M4 to clear it up. Take to F/N.)
3. INTERFERENCE FROM THE SUPERVISOR THAT STOPPED _________
YOU FROM GETTING ON.
(2wc E/S to F/N. Clean up any protest.)
4. PERSONAL OUT ETHICS RESULTING IN A W/H. _________
(2wc what, handle as a W/H.)
5. SIMPLY BOOTED OFF FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO
GOD OR REGISTRARS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
6. DISPUTE OVER FEES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
7. YOU WERE GIVEN A WRONG WHY. _________
(L4BR and handle.)
8. TOLD YOU WERE PTS AND YOU WEREN'T. _________
(Indicate it. 2wc E/S to F/N. L4BR if any trouble.)
9. DIDN'T FULLY CLEAR EACH WORD. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Clear any Mis-U words.)
10. HAVING TO CLEAR WORDS YOU ALREADY UNDERSTOOD. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
11. ARC BRKS ON COURSE. _________
(ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N. Watch out for MWHs.)
12. PROBLEMS ON COURSE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
13. ON COURSE FOR SOME OTHER REASON THAN YOU
STATED. _________
(2wc what, E/S to F/N.)
14. SCN DOWNGRADED TO YOU. _________
(2wc for details, find out who, PTS Interview if necessary.)
15. SCN PEOPLE LIED ABOUT TO YOU. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Find out who. PTS Interview if necessary.)
16. OUT 2D. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.)
17. DIDN'T PAY FOR THE COURSE OR SOME SERVICE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.)
18. SOMEONE KEPT AFTER YOU FOR MONEY. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
19. THERE WAS A FALSE ATTESTATION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.)
20. FALSE EXAM. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Handle as a W/H.)
21. COULDN'T APPLY THE MATERIALS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
22. COULDN'T MASTER A METER. _________
(2wc, find out what he didn't understand about it and clear it up
to F/N.)
23. NOBODY TO AUDIT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
24. PREVENTED FROM AUDITING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
25. YOU WERE CONFUSED. _________
(2wc and clear it up to F/N.)
26. THINGS YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND. _________
(2wc what, clear it up to F/N.)
27. YOU HAD DISAGREEMENTS. _________
(Find out what, find the Mis-U words and clear to F/N.)
28. AN EARLIER SIMILAR SUBJECT WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. _________
(2wc what subject, find out what word in it was Mis-U and clear it
up. Clear each word to F/N.)
29. EARLIER FAILED COURSES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
30. DIDN'T USE WORD CLEARING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N. Clear any words to F/N where he should have.)
31. NO METHOD 1 WORD CLEARING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
32. INTERRUPTIONS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
33. PREVENTED FROM STUDYING. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
34. ADDED TO YOUR CHECKSHEET. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
35. MISSING MATERIALS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
36. NO MATERIALS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
37. NO DICTIONARY. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
38. TECH TERMS YOU DIDN'T GET. _________
(Find out what. Clear to F/N.)
39. COULDN'T FIND THE MATERIALS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
40. TAPE PLAYERS NOT AVAILABLE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
41. COULDN'T GET A METER. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
42. FORCED TO HAVE A TWIN. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
43. BAD COACHING. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
44. NO PRACTICAL. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
45. NO SUPERVISOR. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
46. NO PLACE TO STUDY. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
47. STUDIED UNDER DURESS. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
48. UNREAL QUOTAS SET. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
49. MADE TO DO TRs TOO OFTEN. (2wc E/S to F/N.) _________
50. SUPERVISOR OR SOMEONE GAVE VERBAL TECH OR
INTERPRETED MATERIALS. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
51. LOTS OF ADVICE NOT IN HCO Bs OR TAPES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
52. YOU WERE ON THE WRONG COURSE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
53. SOMEONE MAD AT YOU ON COURSE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
54. EVALUATION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
55. INVALIDATION. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
56. TOLD YOU PASSED WHEN YOU KNEW YOU DIDN'T. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
57. TOLD YOU FLUNKED WHEN YOU KNEW YOU HADN'T. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
58. NOT ENOUGH SLEEP. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
59. NOT ENOUGH TO EAT. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
60. NO PLACE TO LIVE. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
61. FAMILY TROUBLE. _________
(2wc E/S. PTS Interview if necessary.)
62. YOU WERE TAKING DRUGS OR ALCOHOL. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
63. SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR EYESIGHT. _________
(2wc what E/S to F/N.)
64. VIOLATED STUDENT RULES. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
65. SOME OTHER PHYSICAL PROBLEM. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
66. ERROR IN STUDENT AUDITING. _________
(C/S 5 3 RI. )
67. RESTIM. _________
(C/S 53 RI. )
68. BAD EXAMINATION. _________
(2wc to F/N and correct.)
69. CERTIFICATES NEVER CAME. _________
(2wc E/S to F/N.)
70. SOMETHING ON THIS LIST YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? _________
(Clarify and redo list from that point.)
71. SOMETHING ELSE WRONG. _________
(2wc what, if no joy GF M5 and handle.)
Make sure this list is done by an Auditor who can make a meter read and
your courses will fill up with rehabilitated Students.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright �1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 AUGUST 1971R
REVISED 26 NOVEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Dept 13
Qual Div
Qual Bu
POST PURPOSE CLEARING
(This HCO B is the basic action of the
Post Purpose Clearing Unit of Div V,
Qual Div, or by Auditors as a technology.)
An essential part of HATTING as done in HCO is to get the person's POST
PURPOSE CLEARED by an auditor.
INSTANT PURPOSE CLEARING
HCO usually tells the person what the purpose of the post is and
certainly the staff member's seniors would.
This action is not metered and goes along with instant hatting. It is
not done by an auditor.
"George, the purpose of your post is to_____. Any questions?" Questions
are answered and clarified.
Giving the person on the post the purpose is a basic hatting step.
FULL POST PURPOSE CLEARING
This requires an auditor, an E-Meter, and is done in session.
Usually this is done after mini-hatting and after some experience with
the post. It is NOT done in this full fashion before the person has any
knowledge of the post. It can also be done during or at the end of full
hatting.
But the sooner it is done after mini-hatting and some weeks' experience
on the post the more successful it will be.
AUDITOR QUALIFICATIONS
The auditor doing Post Purpose Clearing must be expert with:
1. TRs
2. Metering
3. Code
4. 2-Way Comm
5 . Flying Rudiments
6. L&N.
ADMIN
A Post Purpose Clearing is given full worksheet and report handling and
person goes to Examiner.
A record of the session is kept with others done in the PPC RECORD BOOK
with especially noted any Rock Slam.
PC
The pc must not be in an Ethics cycle, must be rested, not hungry and
not ill or on drugs or medication.
ANY RINGS ON THE PC'S HANDS MUST BE REMOVED AS THEY CAUSE A FALSE ROCK
SLAM.
HAT FOLDER
Staff Member must bring hat folder to the PPC session so if there is
any confusion on purposes in it they can be cleared from the hat folder.
CASE FOLDER
Case folder of the pc must also be collected and examined before
session. This is repeated in the Rundown so it won't be missed.
POST PURPOSE CLEARING STEPS
PPC 1 - Get the staff member's folder. Verify that he is not in the
middle of some processes, repair or Major Grade. If so, don't
touch. Get C/S OK.
PPC 2 - Fly a rud or do a C/S 53RI if TA high or low. Note that it WAS
high on the session worksheet. If the TA does not come down refer
the case to Staff C/S and do not proceed. Case would need Folder
Error Summary and a Hi-Lo TA List IX.
PPC 3 - 2wc about person's post. Be alert to problems or w/hs and if
these seem to be there do E/S to F/N on Problems and/or E/S to F/N
on w/hs.
PPC 4 - 2wc "What do you think is your post?" to F/N. If pc can't tell
you resort to his hat and clear up confusions to F/N.
PPC 5 - 2wc "Tell me about opportunities you would have on your post."
This is carried to F/N. If no F/N treat it as a w/h and ask if
there's anything pc isn't telling you. Carry any w/h to F/N. Then
check the question again and get the F/N back by 2wc or E/S to F/N.
(If you start to clear w/hs in the middle of the Q then the w/hs
will F/N but the Q hasn't yet so must be F/Ned also. Overts may
come up as well as w/hs and if so F/N them by E/S.) Pc should
finish this step with F/N, Cog and GIs.
PPC 6 - 2wc "How does your job align (compare) with what you incline
(would like) to do?" Get any conflicts into view if not clean. Go
E/S to F/N if there is conflict. If no F/N despite Itsa on conflict
ask for overts or withholds and carry this to F/N. Check Q again to
be sure it F/Ns.
PPC 7 - Go over hat mat'ls covering pc's post purpose. Ask him how does
it seem. Get an F/N or clear any confusions up to F/N.
PPC 8 - L&N, "What do you think is the purpose of your post?" to BD F/N
item.
PPC 9 - 2wc "How does this purpose tie in with the purpose of your
Division?" Clean this up if there's doubt. Use folders or OEC
books. Be sure it's cleaned up to F/N.
PPC 10- 2wc "How does this purpose tie in with the purpose of the org?"
Clean this up to F/N.
PPC 11- (Using PPC 8 purpose) "Then is (quote it) the purpose of your
post?" Get a revision so it's really it or accept it. Say, when
it's decided, "Then (quote) is the purpose of your post."
PPC 12- 2wc "If your post was not done what would happen to the org?"
Clean this up to F/N.
PPC 13- 2wc "How do you feel about accomplishing your post purpose?"
Clean this up to F/N.
PPC 14- Thank pc and send to Examiner.
Complete worksheet.
Enter results in log.
Put the session report in pc's folder.
_________
Send a report to the E/O AND TO FLAG if the person Rock Slams and note
it in the folder for pgming to include Ex Dn.
If you can get no satisfactory F/Ns and Cogs and VGIs or if Exam report
is bad, DIRECT THE FACT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HAS AND THE C/O AND THE
CASE SUPER FOR IMMEDIATE CORRECTION. The Remedy is L4BR on the whole RD,
L1C, C/S 53RI and do the clearing again.
_________
Post Purpose Clearing counts as a completion for the Dept on an F/N at
Examiner's.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt .rd
Copyright �1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF I DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo
WORD CLEARING LISTS FOR
PREPARED LISTS
Reference. LRH ED 257 INT
DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS
Here is the list of prepared lists with their word clearing lists.
PREPARED LIST WC LIST
HCO B 24 Nov 73RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue VII
C/S Series 53RI Revised I Dec 74
SHORT HI-LO TA CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
ASSESSMENT C/S SCIENTOLOGY-C/S SERIES 53RI
HCO B I Jan 72RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue IX
LIX HI-LO TA LIST Revised I Dec 74
REVISED CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-LIX HI-LO TA
LIST REVISED
HCO B 29 Oct 71 R BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue X
INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
LIST REVISED SCIENTOLOGY-INT RUNDOWN
CORRECTION LIST REVISED
HCO B 15 Dec 68R BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue V
L4BR CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-L4BR
HCO B 19 Mar 71 BTB 9 Apr 72, Issue VI
L1 C CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-L 1 C
HCO Pi 11 Apr 71 RA BTB 28 Apr 74
L3RD DIANETICS-CLEARING LISTS
AND R3R
HCO B 2 Apr 72RB, Issue II BTB 3 Apr 72R, Issue I
Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 2R
L3 EXD RB CLEARING LISTS AND R3R
HCO B 29 Feb 72R -----
FALSE TA CHECKLIST
HCO B 16 Apr 72 BTB I Dec 74, Issue VII
PTS RD CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-PTS RD
CORRECTION LIST
HCO PL 7 Apr 70RA BTB 9 Apr 72RA, Issue I
GREEN FORM Revised I Dec 74
CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-GREEN FORM
PREPARED LIST WC LIST
HCO B 30 June 71 BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue III
EXPANDED GF 40 RR CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-EXPANDED
GF 40 RR
HCO B 15 Nov 73R -----
FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R
HCO B 15 Nov 74 BTB 15 Nov 74
STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-STUDENT
REHABILITATION LIST
HCO B 4 Feb 72RC BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue XI
STUDY CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
REVISED-Study Series 7 SCIENTOLOGY-STUDY
CORRECTION LIST REVISED
HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue I BTB I Dec 74, Issue II
STUDENT CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
-STUDY CORR LIST I SCIENTOLOGY-STUDENT
CORRECTION LIST
HCO B 27 Mar 72R, Issue II BTB I Dec 74, Issue III
COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
LIST-STUDY CORR LIST 2 SCIENTOLOGY-COURSE
SUPERVISOR CORRECTION LIST
HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue III BTB I Dec 74, Issue IV
AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
-STUDY CORR LIST 3 SCIENTOLOGY-AUDITOR
CORRECTION LIST
HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue IV BTB I Dec 74, Issue V
CASE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
LIST-STUDY CORR LIST 4RA SCIENTOLOGY-CASE SUPERVISOR
CORRECTION LIST
HCO B 27 Mar 72, Issue V BTB I Dec 74, Issue VI
EXECUTIVE CORRECTION LIST CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
-STUDY CORR LIST 5 SCIENTOLOGY-EXECUTIVE
CORRECTION LIST
HCO B 21 July 71RC BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue IV
WORD CLEARING CORRECTION CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
LIST REVISED SCIENTOLOGY-WORD CLEARING
CORRECTION LIST
HCO PL 9 Apr 72
ETHICS-CORRECT DANGER
CONDITION HANDLING (Danger
Assessment, Long Form and
Short Form)
HCO PL 13 Mar 72
Esto Series 5-PRODUCTION
AND ESTABLISHMENT-ORDERS
AND PRODUCTS (Product
Clearing Short Form)
PREPARED LIST WC LIST
HCO PL 23 Mar 72 -----
Esto Series 11-FULL PRODUCT
CLEARING LONG FORM
HCO PL 12 June 72 -----
Data Series 26, Esto Series 18
LENGTH OF TIME TO EVALUATE
(Slow Eval Assessment)
HCO B 28 Aug 70RA BTB 9 Apr 72R, Issue VIII
HC OUT-POINT PLUS-POINT Revised 30 Nov 74
LISTS RA CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
SCIENTOLOGY-HC OUT-POINT
PLUS-POINT LISTS
HCO B 2 Dec 74 BTB I Dec 74, Issue VIII
DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT CLEARING LIST WORDS IN
(Revised from BTB 4 Dec 71, SCIENTOLOGY-DYNAMIC SORT
Issue II, Replacing HCO B 4 Dec 7 1, OUT ASSESSMENT
Issue II, R-1C Assessment
by Dynamics)
_________
KEEP THESE LISTS IN SUPPLY FOR USE. TRAIN AUDITORS TO MAKE THESE LISTS
READ. USE THEM FOR RAVE RESULTS AND YOU WILL SEE A GOLDEN ERA OF TECH IN
YOUR ORG.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo
TR Course
Checksheet
HQS Course
All Auditors
C/Ses
HSDC Checksheet
Academy Levels
Checksheets
SHSBC
Supervisors
TR 0-NOTES ON BLINKING
WHO is doing the confronting? Are you a body? Or a thetan?
Students are trying to do an offshoot called Blinkless TR 0. There is
no such thing. Sitting with any attention on the body just isn't confront-
you aren't doing the drill right.
If your body blinks then OK-but if you are making it blink BY HAVING
ATTENTION ON THE EYES then your TR 0 is out.
If the Supervisor came over and said, "Flunk, you blinked," I wouldn't
Q&A but continue doing TR 0 instead, because I didn't do it.
Excessive blinking shows the thetan is in his eyes. That's not TR 0.
Nervous muscles can be cured with Calcium-Magnesium.
The body should not interfere with your confront. Just don't use any
part of it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo
Cancels
HCO B 10 July 1964, Reissued 5 December 1974
as Integrity Processing Series 6R
HCO B 10 July 1964, "Overts-Order of
Effectiveness in Processing" remains
as originally issued.
Cancels BTB 9 Dec 72,
"Why Overts Work"
Integrity Processing Series 6RA
EFFECTIVENESS OF OVERTS IN PROCESSING
(The data in this Bulletin has been taken
from HCO B 10 July 1964. It is useful in
Integrity Processing.)
ARC BREAKS
The commonest cause of failure in running overt acts is "cleaning
cleans" whether or not one is using a meter. The pc who really has more to
tell doesn't ARC Break when the Auditor continues to ask for one but may
snarl and eventually give it up.
On the other hand leaving an overt touched on the case and calling it
clean will cause a future ARC Break with the Auditor.
"Have you told all?" prevents cleaning a clean. On the unmetered pc one
can see the pc brighten up. On the meter you get a nice fall if it's true
that all is told.
"Have I not found out about something?" prevents leaving an overt
undisclosed. On the unmetered pc the reaction is a sly flinch. On a metered
pc it gives a read.
A pc's protest against a question will also be visible in an unmetered
pc in a reeling sort of exasperation which eventually becomes a howl of
pure bafflement at why the Auditor won't accept the answer that that's all.
On a meter, protest of a question falls on being asked for: "Is this
question being protested?"
There is no real excuse for ARC Breaking a pc by:
1. Demanding more than is there or
2. Leaving an overt undisclosed that will later make the pc upset with
the Auditor.
WHY OVERTS WORK
Overts give the highest gain in raising cause level because they are
the biggest reason why a person restrains himself and withholds self from
action.
Man is basically good. But the reactive mind tends to force him into
evil actions. These evil actions are instinctively regretted and the
individual tries to refrain from doing anything at all. The "best" remedy,
the individual thinks, is to withhold. "If I commit evil actions, then my
best guarantee for not committing is to do nothing whatever." Thus we have
the "lazy", inactive person.
Others who try to make an individual guilty for committing evil actions
only increase this tendency to laziness.
Punishment is supposed to bring about inaction. And it does. In some
unexpected ways.
However, there is also an inversion (a turnabout) where the individual
sinks below recognition of any action. The individual in such a state
cannot conceive of any action and therefore cannot withhold action. And
thus we have the criminal who can't act really but can only re-act and is
without any self direction. This is why punishment does not cure
criminality but in actual fact creates it; the individual is driven below
withholding or any recognition of any action. A thief's hands stole the
jewel, the thief was merely an innocent spectator to the action of his own
hands. Criminals are very sick people physically.
So there is a level below withholding that an Auditor should be alert
to in some pcs, for these "have no withholds" and "have done nothing". All
of which, seen through their eyes, is true. They are merely saying "I
cannot restrain myself" and "I have not willed myself to do what I have
done".
The road out for such a case is the same as that for any other case. It
is just longer. The processes for levels above hold also for such cases.
But don't be anxious to see a sudden return of responsibility, for the
first owned "done" that this person knows he or she has done may be "ate
breakfast". Don't disdain such answers in Level II particularly. Rather, in
such people, seek such answers.
There is another type of case in all this, just one more to end the
list. This is the case who never runs O/W but "seeks the explanation of
what I did that made it all happen to me".
This person easily goes into past lives for answers. Their reaction to
a question about what they've done is to try to find out what they did that
earned all those motivators. That, of course, isn't running the process and
the Auditor should be alert for it and stop it when it happens.
This type of case goes into its extreme on guilt. It dreams up overts
to explain why. After most big murders the police routinely have a dozen or
two people come around and confess. You see, if they had done the murder,
this would explain why they feel guilty. As a terror stomach is pretty
awful grim to live with, one is apt to seek any explanation for it if it
will only explain it.
On such cases the same approach as given works, but one should be very
careful not to let the pc get off overts the pc didn't commit.
Such a pc (recognizable by the ease they dive into the extreme past)
when being audited off a meter gets more and more frantic and wilder and
wilder in overts reported. They should get calmer under processing of
course, but the false overts make them frantic and hectic in a session. On
a meter one simply checks for "Have you told me anything beyond what really
has occurred?" Or "Have you told me any untruths?"
The observation and meter guides given in this section are used during
a session when they apply but not systematically such as after every pc
answer. These observations and meter guides are used always at the end of
every session on the pcs to whom they apply.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1964, 1974 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The 5 December 1974 reissue of HCO B 10 July 1964, which the above HCO B
cancels, was taken verbatim from HCO B 10 July 1964.]
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974R
Remimeo REVISED 14 DECEMBER 1974
Ex Dn C/Ses
Expanded Dianetics Series 22R
EXPANDED DIANETICS
REQUISITES
The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be
made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it.
The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for
Ex Dn have been done.
Attach to the inside left cover of the folder.
1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. _________
2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP.
_________
3. Pc has been given a thorough C/S 1 and is grooved in. _________
4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. No no interest
but reading items remain unrun. No medicine, drug or stimulant
left unrun. _________
5. Pc successful at Dianetic Engram running. Can run Dn easily.
_________
6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method 1 run very flat to F/N list.
_________
7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L-3ExDRB and R3R
words. _________
8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53RI. _________
9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. _________
10. Pc has had any messed-up L & N and Why lists corrected. _________
11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to start
Ex Dn. _________
12. Pc is getting Ex Dn after Dn, after Exp Gr 4 or after OT3.
These are the only points Ex Dn is run on a case. _________
Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly
on Ex Dn.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright �1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JANUARY 1975
Remimeo Cancels HCO B 15 July 1971, Issue I,
Class IV C/S Series 28R, 32R, 33R, 36R-
HDCs "Quads Cancelled"
Ex Dn
Spclsts
QUADS REINSTATED
With the release of the Introspection RD and the Vital Info RD and
recent HCO Bs such as the revised GF 40 Expanded it is vital that the
original Quad Dianetics materials be made fully available to you.
am therefore re-issuing them as: C/S Series 28RA-1, "Use of Quadruple
Dianetics", 32RA-1, "Use of Quad Dianetics", 33RA-1, "Triple and Quad
ReRuns" and 36RB-1, "Quadruple Dianetics, Dangers of".
These HCO Bs are fully valid and must be Word Cleared, starrated, done
in clay and drilled by any HDC, Cl IV HDC or Ex Dn Specialist before they
are permitted to audit Quad Dn.
QUAD RULES
There are two rules that must be observed in running Quad Dianetics:
ONCE A PC HAS BEEN QUAD HE IS QUAD THEREAFTER.
WHEN CATCHING UP UNRUN FLOW ZEROS ONLY RUN THOSE THAT READ.
Running unreading Flow 0s when putting in missing F0s, as in a Quad pc
who was switched to Triples then was having his unrun F0s run, is the
reason for overrun manifestations and BPC.
NEW PCs
New pcs may be started on Quad Dianetics and if so must remain Quad
thereafter.
Old pcs run Triple, let them remain Triple unless you have to do the
Introspection RD or some Quad RD. If so, put in the reading unrun F0s
before attempting a new RD Quad.
There are probably quite a few pcs run on Quads from 1971 who have
since been run Triple. These pcs should be called in and have their reading
unrun F0s run.
Don't now create a further backlog by mixing up process flows on
current pcs.
DO IT RIGHT, TRIPLE OR QUAD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1971
REISSUED 13 JANUARY 1975
Remimeo
HGC Auditors
Dn & Scn
Checksheets C/S Series 28RA-1
C/Ses
USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS
With the introduction of QUADRUPLE DIANETICS the problems of how to C/S
it arise.
This rule is followed:
IN ALL BUT HCO B 24 July 69 DIANETIC ASSISTS WHERE IT CAN BE USED AT
ONCE, THE FOURTH FLOW-O-MUST BE RUN ON ALL ITEMS FORWARD FROM THE FIRST
DIANETIC ITEM EVER RUN ON THE CASE IF THE PC IS QUAD AND THE FLOW O READS.
Where a case has already had Flows 2 and 3 run on Singles, one goes
back and runs Flow 0 on those items if it reads.
Where a case has only been run on Single Flow Dianetics (Flow 1) one
goes back to the first Dianetic Item ever run of which record can be found
and does F 2, F 3, F 0 in that order checking the command for read before
running it, and then verifying the F 1.
To C/S a case for Quad Dianetics it is best to first lay out a
Scientology repair, making sure the case is flying, then list out the items
already run on Single and Triple. Then get them run so that all four flows
are complete on each item in sequence from first to last.
This includes any LX items, former practice, drugs or any other engram
running. These, like Dianetic items, are listed in their correct sequence
of former running.
Then the missing flows are run if they read.
A rehab step of the flows already run is not necessary. This rehab of a
flow already run to EP is usually used only when there is question about
its having gone to F/N Cog VGIs.
In C/Sing for Quadruple one COMPLETES any flow of an item found that
did not F/N. This is indicated on the item list.
DOING THE LIST
The item list is done by the Auditor in his admin time for well done
time credits.
All former Dianetic items ever run are listed and what flows have been
run on them and to what end phenomena.
Example:
Engram List
3 Sept 69 Sadness (exact wording that was used) F 1
4 Sept 69 A Bored Feeling F 1 Bogged
6 Sept 69 An Apathetic Outlook F 1 Bogged
6 Nov 69 LX Agonized F 1 F 2 F 3
7 Nov 69 Former Therapy F 1 F 2 F 3
F 2 Bogged
9 Nov 69 Earlier Practices F 1 Bogged
10 Nov 69 A Horrible Sadness F 1 Bogged
5 July 70 Int RD F 1 F 2 F 3
F 3 Bogged
6 July 71 An Awful Pressure F 1 Bogged
Such a list is then handled from the earliest forward by:
(a) Completing the bogged flow and
(b) Completing the missing flow, if it reads.
INT-EXT RD
This is handled in its proper sequence on the list if the TA is not
high or very low.
If the TA on the pc is currently high, Int is handled before any other
action is done and all four flows are run on it with the understanding that
a pc run Triple on Int must have the Flow 0 checked for read before running
it.
A drug chain also makes a high TA if in existence or unflat.
AUDITOR CHECKOUT
BEFORE RUNNING ANY DIANETICS QUADRUPLE EVER Y AUDITOR HDC, VI, VII,
VIII AND C/Ses MUST BE CHECKED OUT THOROUGHLY ON THE QUAD DIANETICS
CHECKLIST:
BTB 6 May 69R "Routine 3 R Revised'' Issue II
HCO B 4 Jan 71 "Exteriorization and High TA"
HCO B 23 Jan 71 "Exteriorization"
BTB 1 Dec 70R ' "Dianetics Triple Flow Action"
BTB 20 May 70 ' 'TR 103, 104 Rundown"
HCO B 7 Mar 71 "Use of Quadruple Dianetics"
Reissued 13.1.75 C/S Series 28RA-1
HCO B 4 Apr 71 "Use of Quad Dianetics"
Reissued 13.1. 75 C/S Series 32RA- 1
HCO B 5 Apr 71 "Triple and Quad ReRuns"
Reissued 13.1. 75 C/S Series 33RA- 1
HCO B 21 Apr 71 "Quadruple Dianetics-Dangers Of"
Reissued 13.1. 75 C/S Series 36RB- 1
Any other HCO B of subsequent issue on this subject.
THERE IS A PACK ON THIS SUBJECT AVAILABLE FROM FLAG.
FLUBS
If any Auditor has a poor record of getting Dianetics Results, of
bogged flows, etc, he needs an HDC Retread. His drills and TRs are out or
he is committing Gross Auditing Errors.
Dianetics gives remarkable results only when flawlessly done.
The commands must be precisely given and all commands 1-9 A-D are used.
It is NEVER shorted "because the pc did it".
THUS ANY HDC TO AUDIT QUAD DIANETICS MUST:
(A) HAVE A RECORD OF GOOD FLUBLESS DIANETIC AUDITING or
(B) MUST HAVE A RETREAD UNDER A COMPETENT SUPERVISOR and
(C) MUST BE STARRATED (for true, not just checked) ON THE ABOVE
CHECKSHEET OR THE FULL QUAD PACK.
C/Sing
Quad Dianetics, with the above, otherwise C/Ses the same as general
DIANETICS.
It should be realized Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing. This
remains the same in Quad Dianetics.
PROMOTION
Quad Dianetics should be promoted only when you have Dianetic Auditors,
the Auditors checked out and okayed to audit as above and when you CAN
DELIVER.
IVs or VIs should be available to do the Progress Pgms and steps.
UPPER LEVELS
When the IVs VIs VIIs VIIIs or IXs are checked out as above, they
should use Quad Dianetics to handle any and all Engram steps called for in
general auditing.
That they are upper level Auditors does not make it less necessary to do
the above.
RESULTS
Quad Dianetics, including the rerun actions, produces some very
startling new gains.
Well done Dianetics always has produced fine results.
Quad Dianetics almost doubles the gain.
REMEDIES
Any and all Dianetic Remedies and general technology remain in full
use. They are not changed at all. Only the zero flow is added in each case.
Good Luck.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ntjh
Copyright �1971, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1971-1R
ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975
REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975
Remimeo
(Cancels HCO B 4 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, same title.
Does NOT cancel HCO B 4 Apr 71RA, Rev. 24 Mar 74,
C/S Series 32RA, which is still valid.)
(Changes in this type style)
C/S Series 32RA-1R
USE OF QUAD DIANETICS
With the introduction of Quadruple Dianetics it is mandatory important
urgent that one does not audit four flow items until one has brought all
earlier Dianetic items into four flows.
TRIPLE
This also applies to Triple Dianetics. On a case where only Flow One
(Single) has been run, you don't suddenly run a Triple (F1, F2, F3) such as
on the LX Class VIII Lists until one has run the earliest Dn item ever run
(or that can be found) on Dn Triple and then on forward on Triple up to the
LX.
QUAD
However, one would now not bother to run only Triples forward. He would
locate the earliest Single or Triple (if no Single Flow) item and run it
Quadruple by now running the missing flows. In the case of a pc run Triple,
Flow 0 is checked for read before running it.
INT RD
In doing an INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN one mustn't suddenly introduce the
4th flow (F Zero).
If the case has only had Triples in Dianetics one mustn't suddenly
introduce a Flow Zero on INT. The case should be done on Triple Flow INT.
THEN all earlier Dn items in sequence run are:
(a) Listed from W/S or Folder Summaries.
(b) Brought up to current by running in all the missing flows of
Quad.
(c) The INT RD fourth flow is audited in when one gets to it IF IT
READS.
REASON
Auditing additional flows while earlier items remain Single or Triple
restimulates the missing flows and stacks them up as mass. They can make a
pc uncomfortable until run.
All the missing flows (that were not run) are still potential mass.
This mass restimulates like something too late on the chain when a flow not
run on earlier items is run on later items.
Auditing itself is a sort of time track. The earliest session blows the
later sessions.
FULL FLOW TABLE
Before running Quad Dianetics one makes a table of earlier items run.
Like this:
FULL FLOW TABLE
Flow
Date Item Previously Run Must Run
2.3.62 Guf Shoulder F1 F2, 3, 0
3.3.67 Gow in Foot F1 F2, 3, 0
30.4.67 Chow in Chump F1 F2, 3, 0
29.9.68 LX Anger F1, 2, 3 F0
LX Peeved F1, 2, 3 F0
4.10.69 Feeling Numb F1, 2, 3 F0
5. 9.70 Int RD F1, 2, 3 F0
9.10.70 Feeling of Goof F1, 2, 3 F0
10.10.71 Dn Assist on Head F1 F2, 3, 0
FLOWS
F1 is FLOW ONE, something happening to self.
F2 is FLOW TWO, doing something to another.
F3 is FLOW THREE, others doing things to others.
F0 is FLOW ZERO, self doing something to self.
R3R COMMANDS
Standard R3R Commands are used on Quad Dianetics.
They are the subject of another HCO B.
The Zero Command however is very easy being "Locate an incident of
(loss or emotion) (pain and unconsciousness) when you caused yourself to
have a(an) (item)" with the other commands of R3R as usual.
NARRATIVE
The question will come up, do we Triple or Quad Narrative items or
Multiple somatic items.
The test is, did the flows already run F/N when they were originally
run. If they did, include them. If they didn't run exclude them.
This does not mean you omit everything that didn't run.
REPAIR
While auditing this FULL FLOW DIANETICS you will find various chains
that did not F/N when originally run.
These are included and should be concluded to F/N. This means one has
to find out if they by-passed the F/N, went too early, jumped the chain,
etc. Usually an L3RD assessed on that faulty action will give the answer.
It is easy to make these old flubbed chains F/N unless you work at it too
hard. Usually the reason they didn't is visible on the old worksheet. The
auditor forgot to ask for Earlier Beginning or by-passed the F/N or jumped
the chain or tried to run it twice forgetting he'd run it before. Corny
errors.
RESULT
The result of doing a FULL FLOW DIANETIC ACTION on a case is quite
spectacular. The shadowy remains of somatics blow, mass blows and the pc
comes up shining.
OFFERING FFD
Offering the public Full Flow Dianetics must include the cost of
FESing, FF table making, and C/S work since it is sometimes lengthy. The
auditing can be remarkably brief. The greatest amount of time is usually
spent on the C/Sing and the table making.
FFD is offered to the public in intensives as per HCO B 31 May 1971R,
C/S Series 39R, "Standard 12 1/2 Hour Intensive Programs". Admin time spent
on C/Sing, FESing and FF table making should be deducted from the Intensive
Hours purchased by the pc. This must be made known to the public when
purchasing the service.
When offering FFD it should be called Quadruple Dianetics-4 times more
powerful than previous auditing.
A C/S must liaise with the Dissem Sec and Treasury Sec on selling it or
he'll find the org is losing money doing the C/Sing and tables.
OT WARNING
When doing Quadruple Dianetics on Clears and OTs (and a very few
others) it may be found that many chains are now missing or are just copies
of the original. Don't be disturbed. Pc says they're gone now they're gone.
Just F/N the fact and carry on with the next flow or item.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt .rd
Copyright � 1971, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 APRIL 1971
Remimeo REISSUED 13 JANUARY 1975
All Auditors
C/Ses
Class VIII
C/S Series 33RA-1
TRIPLE AND QUAD RERUNS
LAW: WHEN ONE OR MORE OF THE FOUR FLOWS OF AN ITEM OR GRADE ARE LEFT
UNRUN, WHEN USED IN LATER PROCESSES THE EARLIER UNRUN ONES RESTIMULATE AND
MAKE MASS.
This tells you that high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness can come
from by-passed flows.
BY-PASSED FLOWS
Example: Dianetic Singles have been run on 7 items. Now the Auditor
begins to run new items Triple without running Triple on the already run
items. The result will be 7 unrun Flow 2s and 7 unrun Flow 3s. These will
restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge.
Example: Now let us say all 7 previous items have been run Triple. And
the Auditor now runs a new item Quadruple. This leaves 7 unrun Zero chains.
These can restimulate and form mass and by-passed charge.
Example: Now let us say that Dianetics was all run Single and Grades
were run Triple. This will restimulate the Dn chains F2 and F3.
Example: Let us say that Dianetics and Scientology Grades were all run
Triple. An Interiorization Rundown is now run Quad. This will throw all
Dianetic and Scientology unrun Flow Zeros into restimulation and give by-
passed charge.
ANY LATER GRADE RUN WITH MORE FLOWS THAN USED IN EARLIER ACTIONS CAN
THROW THE EARLIER UNFLAT FLOWS INTO RESTIM, PILE UP MASS GIVING HIGH TA AND
BPC GIVING ARC BREAKS.
REPAIR
The more the condition is repaired by L1C, L4BR, etc, etc, the worse
the Mass gets.
SOURCE OF HIGH TA
Thus High TAs have three principal sources:
1. Overruns
2. Auditing Past Exterior
3. Earlier Unrun Flows restimulated by those flows used in later
actions.
There are other minor ones such as Drug Background, illness, etc, as
per Hi-Lo TA Assessment.
REHABS
One must NOT recklessly or continuously rehab a past major action. This
causes overrun. The thetan is placed at the end of the incidents not yet in
restimulation or run and the bank gets more solid.
MASSY THETANS
The whole trick of this universe is contained in thetans copying or
picturing incidents and then getting stuck in the later portion of them.
"Incidents" is the keynote. A thetan is incident hungry.
This is what traps him.
For some reason he has to be at the earliest end of incidents to erase
them. The later he is in incidents and the later he is on the track the
more solid he is.
This also applies to the "auditing time track".
By omitting things like flows on the auditing time track, the thetan
thus becomes massy.
The whole theory of the Interiorization Remedy is based on having gone
out (later) after he went in (earlier). So Exteriorizing can stick him.
(People buy the Int RD to Exteriorize but the remedy is only done to permit
further auditing. They Ext of course when the bank is handled.)
When flows of items are by-passed and then later restimulated by
auditing them, mass occurs.
GETTING IN ALL FLOWS
When doing additional flows on earlier items or processes one must also
check or rehab those flows marked as run to F/N in worksheets.
This again will leave unflat flows and BPC unless it is done.
And if it is overdone it will raise the TA by overrun.
So if one had a case that had Single Dianetics and was later run on
Triple for new items (but the Singles not done into Triple) one would have
to RUN FIRST the missing unrun flow or flows if they read and then check
the first Single Fl for flatness, then check other previously run flows.
The rule is run the previously unrun one or ones first if they read to
get charge off, then verify or run the ones listed as run already.
Then one would do the same for the next item. Run the previously unrun
flow or flows if they read and then verify or run those listed as already
run to be sure they F/N.
All items, in chronological sequence, and all processes, would have to
be run Quad.
IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME NOW TO RUN IN ONLY TRIPLES.
Whether you have the Quad commands or not they are easy to figure out
as you are only missing the Zero Flow, self to self.
So all C/Ses and auditing actions are "Rehab or Run Fl, F2, F3, F0 if
they read" when getting in all flows on things run to date.
HIGH TA
When you are sure an Int RD has been done correctly and its 2wc went
F/N and the TA later goes high, you check the Int RD. That is the most
usual reason. This simple action is amazingly subject to flubs.
If the TA goes high later you can do a C/S Series 53 or a Hi-Lo TA
Assessment and handle.
If the TA is still high or low, you had better check the state of
flows. Were more flows run on later actions than were run on earlier
actions?
If so, your pc has felt massy, sometimes even ill.
The right action is to get in all flows from the beginning. And do it
Quad. Bring all his auditing up to Quad.
(If his folder is not available, he has kind of had it. I know of no
way, at this writing, to recover lost Dn items but will have to work
something out.)
NOT IN TROUBLE
If the pc is not in trouble, his best bet is to get on up the grades to
Expanded OT III.
IN TROUBLE
If he is massy and is having trouble the best bet is to:
1. Be totally sure of his Int RD.
2. Check O/Rs particularly of a major grade twice or by-passed
F/Ns, locate and indicate them.
3. FES, list the items and grades and do a Full Flow action from
the beginning of his auditing, raising them all to Quadruple.
RUNNING ZERO FLOWS
The Zero Flow in Dianetics is a bit strange. It can be done by full R3R
BUT it often depends on the decision the pc made and may F/N very suddenly.
It is easily overrun and can be very fast.
A pc can be gotten into trouble on Zero Flows if the Auditor is slow
and is not alert to his meter and misses the F/N and gives R3R commands
after the flow has blown.
REHAB OR RUN
The Auditor getting in Zero Flows can also ARC Brk the pc by failing to
verify if the previously run flows are flat. All the Auditor wants is to
see them F/N on the command. If they don't he runs them.
Sometimes when he has "run them" again he finds they are being overrun
or run twice and has to rehab them by finding this out. The pc sometimes
doesn't know until he actually starts to run them. Then he finds they are
already run. The clue to this is a climbing TA. If the TA goes up, get off
that flow and rehab it.
Example: Pc at first thinks "Pain in shoulder" F2 was never run. Starts
to run it. TA goes up. Auditor must pull him off of it by finding out if it
is being run twice and rehab it to F/N.
The moral in all these reruns is don't firefight, keep an L1C List and
an L3RD List handy and use them.
RESULTS
The results of straightening up the Int-Ext RD, rehabbing O/Rs and
putting in ALL FLOWS on a pc are fantastic.
Getting an All Flows Rundown done correctly gives one all the latent
gain the pc
has been begging for.
So send to Cramming all C/Ses and Auditors who flub.
Program it right.
C/S it right.
Audit it right.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1971, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 APRIL 1971-1R
Remimeo
All Auditors ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975
Class VIII REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975
Dn Chksht
Int-Ext Chksht (Cancels HCO B 21 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, same title.
Does not cancel HCO B 21 Apr 71RB, Reissued 21 Sept 74,
C/S Series 36RB, which is still valid. )
C/S Series 36RB-1R
QUADRUPLE DIANETICS
DANGERS OF
(Applies also to Int-Ext Rundown)
(Ref HCO B 4 Apr 71-1R, Addition of 13 Jan 75, Revised 22 Feb 75,
C/S Series 32RA-1R, and HCO B 5 Apr 71, Reissued 13 Jan 75, C/S Series 33RA-
1)
In observing Quad Dianetics in the hands of Scientology Auditors not
specially briefed or who had additives and figure-figure on how to move a
case already run on Singles and Triples into Full Flow,
INVARIABLY THEY OVERRAN.
This makes getting Quad Dianetics in on a case dangerous unless the
Auditor has the hang of it.
The flagrant (and I do mean flagrant) errors found consisted of (a) not
being able to run precise Standard Dianetics in the first place; (b) re-
running already erased chains "to find if they were flat"; (c) Out TRs to a
wild extent; (d) refusing utterly to accept pc's data; (e) faulty metering;
(f) complete ignorance of the Auditor's Code, notably committing the crime
of Invalidating the pc; (g) running unreading Flows when catching a pc up
to Quad.
REQUIREMENTS
Anyone essaying to run Quad Dianetics MUST BE CRAMMED on his R3R, the
use of L3RD, all data on Quad Dianetics (as per references above and
including HCO B 27 Mar 71, "Dianetic Erasure"), his basic TRs, his metering
and the Auditor's Code, and this HCO B.
TRs
TR Zero exists so an Auditor is not ducking the session but can sit
there relaxed, doing his job.
TR One must be done so the pc can hear and understand the Auditor
(without blowing the pc's head off either).
TR Two must be done so that the pc gets acknowledged. This can be so
corrupted that the Auditor doesn't ack at all but gives the pc meter reads!
Instead of acks! Or keeps saying, "I didn't understand you," etc.
TR Three basically existed so that the Auditor would continue to give
the pc commands and not squirrel off or pack up with total silence.
TR Four exists so that the pc's origins are accepted and not Qed and
Aed with or invalidated.
And, surprise, surprise, TRs are for use in the session itself, not just a
drill. They are how one runs a session.
Metering can miss every F/N or give "F/Ns" with high or low TA. And one
never feeds meter data to the pc: "That read," "That didn't read," "That
blew down," just must not exist in session patter. "Thank you. That F/Ned,"
is as far as an Auditor goes. And that's the end of the cycle and says so.
Floating needles can be overlooked by an Auditor. In Quad Dianetics
this fault is fatal.
Auditor's Code must be in on all points and particularly Invalidation.
Pc says, "That's so and so." An Auditor who says, "I'm sorry. You are
wrong," or any other invalidation is going to wreck a pc's case. A full
knowledge of the Auditor's Code and actually applying it saves endless
troubles. It is an auditing TOOL, not just a nice idea.
REHABBING CHAINS
One rehabs a Dianetic Chain that, according to a previous worksheet,
erased by saying, "According to session records (flow direction) (item)
erased." That's all. One does not say, "Did the chain giving others a
headache erase?" One does not run it again to find out. One does not run a
single command "to see if it F/Ns again". One can say, "Do you agree that
the chain giving another a headache erased?" But the more you ask a pc to
look for an erased chain the more messed up things will get. It isn't
there. But the Auditor by his action can imply it should be there or might
be there. A totally wrong approach would be, "Look around your bank and see
if what isn't there anymore isn't there."
Dianetics is NOT Scientology. A Dianetic Chain is not a release. If you
try to use Scientology rehab tech on a Dianetic Chain, you have had it. It
isn't a "release" (which is a key-out). A Dianetic Chain is an erasure. You
can't rehab erasures with "How many times?", etc.
The test of this is the doing. If you try to use Scn rehab on Dianetic
Chains, the PC MIGHT TRY TO FIND SOMETHING. This causes him to key in other
unrun or similar items.
It is a dangerous action at best to try to handle old erased chains.
The best you can do is to tell the pc what the old W/S said. If no W/S
exists leave the already erased flows alone!
FLUBBED CHAINS
Many times, a Folder Error Summary will give a flubbed chain and then
fail to note it was repaired in the next session!
A C/S and Auditor would have been pretty irresponsible to just go on
auditing past flubbed chains.
The only safe way to handle some previous flubbed chain is to:
(a) Verify in the folder if it was repaired.
(b) If still unrepaired assess L3RD on it and handle according to
the L3RD.
L3 RD
Using the new L3RD (HCO B 11 Apr 71 RA) is a Dianetic action.
A Scientology Auditor erroneously can try to use it as a 2-way comm type of
list. If a chain needed one more ABCD, then 2-way comm on it with no ABCD
is not going to complete it.
L3RD has its own directions. Questions not marked with directions are
used to indicate the fact. This can amount to 2-way comm as the pc chews it
over. But L3RD where marked is handled by Dianetics actions. Look over the
list and its directions for each question and you will see that some are
given directions that are NOT 2wc.
Example: "Earlier beginning" reads. You can't just say, "The incident
had an earlier beginning," and you can't say, "Tell me about the earlier
beginning." The pc will go up the wall. There'll be no F/N. You have to use
R3R and get him to the earlier beginning and then run it and if it still
doesn't erase, get him to an Earlier Similar and erase that.
L3RD is a Dianetics List. It is not a Scientology List that is cleared
each question to F/N by 2-way comm.
OVERRUN
Overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA.
If as you seek to get in Full Flow Dianetics the pc's TA begins to
average higher, overrun is occurring.
Example: While doing FFD pc's TA has been riding at 2.2 and F/Ns. After
a new FFD action it begins to ride at 2.5 and F/Ns. Something is being
overrun. Find it and indicate it. And cease to stir the bank up so much!
The fault is going over items already run.
Already flat zero flows are not uncommon. The zero flattened on the
original Triple. Thus getting in that zero flow again is an overrun.
In doing a Full Flow Table you often find that the same or similar have
been run in the past. Sometimes you find that a previous attempt to run the
item a second or third time has resulted in an ARC Break, the reason for
which was never detected.
The right action is to note the session date it was first run and just
tell the pc, "Feeling Surprised was run three times. On (first date it was
erased) it was erased. When later run it was an overrun." This tends to
blow the later charge laid in by trying to run the same item again.
It sounds so strange that erased chains can be overrun. But it is true.
What happens is that pcs try to cooperate and put something there.
FIREFIGHTS
The action of a quarrel between an Auditor and a pc is called a
firefight.
Restimulating earlier unrun engrams or overrunning chains upsets a pc.
The best action, as soon as a pc is disturbed, is to do an L3RD fast and
handle what reads the way it should be handled according to the L3RD.
The wrong way is to argue or try to go on.
The pc does NOT know what it is. He just feels awful. He tries to
guess. He will ARC Brk or get sad if the Auditor continues.
The correct action is an L3RD.
L1C is not of great use in a Dianetic ARC Brk. L3RD is.
If the pc remains ARC Broken, try L3RD again Method 5.
A Scientology session would be handled with some other list (L1C, L4B,
etc). A Dianetic session, including and especially FFD, is handled with
L3RD.
You NEVER prepcheck while doing Dianetics. This mushes up the engrams.
INTERIORIZATION
ALL these cautions apply as well to an Interiorization-Exteriorization
Rundown, when restim occurs one uses an L3RD quickly.
Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology action.
SAFE ACTIONS
A fully genned in Auditor, well crammed, well drilled, well skilled,
can be trusted with Dianetics, Dianetic Quads and an Int-Ext RD. Auditors
not so handled can get pcs into serious trouble with these things.
A safe course is to use Quad only on new never audited before pcs.
Those begun on Triples, use then only Triple flows.
Another safe way is to use FFD only on OT IIIs or OT IVs and done only
by fully qualified FFD Auditors who are also OT III.
The safest course is to require special drilling and cramming on
Auditors who are already known for their results by actual success story
stats and call FFD and Int-Ext RD a skilled specialty.
C/S RESPONSIBILITY
Any trouble a C/S is running into comes from the factors of TRs,
metering, Code and incomplete or false Auditor's reports.
If when I am C/Sing I ever find an Auditor has omitted key session
actions or has falsified a report, I order that Auditor not to Cramming but
a full retrain HDC right on up.
A C/S does not see these points. He can get the pc asked what the
Auditor is doing or did. He can get sessions monitored. This helps him fill
this gap in his data.
It's what isn't in the Auditor's report that is often the trouble.
Auditors omit what they said, omit the firefight, omit session alter-is in
their worksheets.
All this sticks the C/S's neck out for the axe of failure.
So particularly in FFD, Int-Ext and other such actions, a C/S has to
act to obtain confidence in the Auditor's TRs, Metering, Code Use and
accurate Worksheets.
RISK
In FFD, Int-Ext RD and Power, experience has proven that if the Auditor
is not top grade, if the C/S is not alert, we put a pc at risk.
The USUAL is what keeps the pc safe.
A thorough study of his case, looking for obvious bugs (such as Int-Ext RD
done twice, the case a druggie but Drug engrams never run, Int done but its
2wc flubbed, FFD grossly overrun, to name a few serious ones), sending
Auditors to Cramming for the slightest flub, insisting on standard TRs USED
IN SESSION, good metering, use of the Code, accurate and complete
worksheets, use of standard tech, all guarantee the safety and progress of
the pc.
INTRODUCING FFD
FFD (like the Int-Ext RD) requires flawless C/Sing and auditing or the
case goes wrong.
When these actions were introduced they showed up any flaws in case
studying, TRs, Metering, Code and Worksheets.
There are two ways to handle. (a) Cancel FFD and Int-Ext as actions.
Obviously that is going backwards and is impossible. (b) Begin and continue
a serious, effective campaign in the org to (1) Train Auditors better, (2)
Cram expertly on every flub, (3) Raise quality of TRs and metering.
As you can see, my approach is to improve quality of training, cramming
and delivery.
Please help me out in getting this in.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1971, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JANUARY 1975
Remimeo
Dn & Ex Dn C/Ses
IV and VI C/Ses
Class VIII C/S
PAST LIFE REMEDIE
There are many remedies and considerable tech developed over the years
on the subject of pcs unable to go earlier than this life. There was no
full coverage bulletin which gave the full story on this.
The earliest was getting the pc to locate and run imaginary incidents.
This is fully covered in Science of Survival, especially Book Two, Chapter
Nine, "Imaginary Incidents". The auditor clears the idea of imaginary
incidents and running them, then persuades the pc to run them without
forcing him.
Delusion tends to run off but the real incidents move into view as
well. These imaginary incidents can be run R3R narrative or done as part of
R3R procedure and running usual items and somatics. It can be incorporated
into the AESPs run on the Past Life Remedy as part of the action of
grooving in the pc.
One of the early Dianetic Remedies was simply "What Attitudes would
make one unwilling to go Earlier than this life?" R3R Triple exhaust the
list then do Emotions Sensations and Pains separately.
Where the pc is afraid of going earlier or seeing the pictures, AESPs
that would make you not want to look at earlier lives can be listed
separately and run.
Often the pc won't go backtrack because he's a druggie.
What has happened here is that he restimulated past lives with drugs,
got into frightening pictures that he didn't understand and now backs off
from ANY bank content except drugs. That is handled with a full Drug R/D,
including a full battery of Objectives and all reading items run including
"no interest" items. The standard approach on any pc is to get a full Drug
R/D done first.
Another reason could be the pc is in recent shock of having died. Such
a case is overburdened and is destimulated with general auditing and then
gets a Past Life Remedy if he hasn't gone backtrack. You could even do a
Prior Assessment to this life.
The subject of invalidation of past lives and people talking about them
out of session or claiming to be famous people invalidates past lives for a
pc and is actually related to suppression and PTS phenomena. If you suspect
this you could ask "Has anyone been talking to you about past lives or
famous people?" From this question possible suppression in the environment
can be located and used in a PTS R/D, HCO B 9 Dec 71R, Revised 21 Oct 74.
CHILDREN
Children are usually very burdened cases and can be hard to C/S on
Dianetics as it hits this life only which will leave the pc wide open to
key-in and at the age of 20 be found all keyed in "with all grades run".
I find they are jammed into fiction stories, education, books and
movies and run these like Engrams. These children speak of "remembering"
all the time. They say they can't go backtrack "because they don't
remember". They don't seem to take it from pictures. Contrary to psychology
theories and popular belief I find children in very
rough case shape, nervous, frightened, griefy, etc. They get stuck in the
books and movies they see.
I have handled this in various ways. The easiest way to unburden cases
is by Objectives (contact processes) and Recall (ARC S/W, Self Analysis).
That is a general approach. You can list for mental image pictures pc has
seen in life in movies or books then get the AESPs of the best reading one
and R3R triple or quad. Unwanted feelings, attitudes, emotions, sensations
and pains as a child can also be listed and run to unburden the case.
A direct approach is to ask "What book or movie were you particularly
interested in?" You'll usually find that the person had a stuck picture on
it. Then ask "Did you ever have anything to do with that sort of thing?"
Then they go into it because you're asking for an E/S. You could then run
out the earlier incident R3R triple or quad and you'd be away.
Where the pc is stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books you
can list for "Bad incidents you've seen or read about", take the best
reading one and R3R its reading AESPs. Be sure to accept stories, TV,
movies or books as these are fully valid to run.
REVIEW
A Scientology Review action that can be done is to assess Auditors
Auditing Past Lives Dianetics Scientology Time Preclears and Erasure. Then
prepcheck in order of reads, reassess and prepcheck. This is a valuable
action to do before ARC S/W triple and often by itself will handle those
unable to go past track.
A further Scientology approach would be to assess the Past, Memory
Pictures, Past Lives and prepcheck in order of reads. Then L & N "Who or
what would have no future?" then L & N "Who or what would it have been
awful to have been?" These items can be checked and used in a PTS R/D or
can have their intentions listed and run as part of Ex Dn handling.
SUMMARY
The technology on past lives is important for a C/S to know, especially
the Dianetics C/S.
The subject usually resolves with a Drug R/D and general auditing but
when it doesn't you have these remedies to use.
Use them well.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rs.rd
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HYMN OF ASIA
An Eastern Poem
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published
January 1975
"Man has long dreamed of solving the riddle of his own existence and
achieving personal freedom. This has been the great hope of Man through the
millennia of his histories-both East and West.
"Now at last, in the 1046 lines of the poem Hymn of Asia, is the statement
that this hope has been achieved-You can be free.
"This moving hymn was written for a Buddhist Convention in about 1955 or
'56, coincident with the celebrations in the Buddhist world of the 2,500th
year of the Buddhist era. Later typed copies of this magnificent work, many
in altered versions, were widely circulated from hand to hand in various
countries of the world. The public demand for its publication grew
enormous.
"Then in late 1973 its author directed its publication and subsequently
personally supervised the collaboration of a talented artist, designer and
calligrapher in the final preparation of the book. Here we have a beautiful
edition which presents the fully correct original text of the poem, one
surely destined to become a major document of Man's spiritual history.
"Hymn of Asia concerns the fulfillment of a prophecy made 2,500 years ago
by Siddhartha Gautama, better known as Buddha, the founder of the religion
known in the West as Buddhism."
(-Introduction to Hymn of Asia)
Available from your nearest Scientology Advanced Organization, or direct
from the publishers: Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6,
1608 Copenhagen V, Denmark; or Church of Scientology Publications
Organization U.S., 2723 West Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90026,
U.S.A.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1975
Remimeo
Class VIIIs
Class VIII
THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII
The purpose of the Class VIII Course is to train an Auditor up to be
able to deliver 100% Standard Tech and turn him into a zealot in pushing in
Standard Tech in the field.
This has been the purpose of Class VIII since its inception.
Its materials are fully valid. The original checksheet has been
restored. It is a tough and demanding course. It is not Fast Flow but 3
times through with starrates and exams.
THE ORIGINAL CLASS VIII COURSE HAS RETURNED.
Training of Auditors as Class VIIIs to forward Standard Tech is
absolutely vital today. It is not "old" or "background". Its materials
cannot be found on any other course. They are only available on the Class
VIII Course.
A real Class VIII Auditor cannot be compared with a Class IV or VI. A
Class VIII is a flawless, flubless, smooth as silk specialist in Standard
Tech. He can handle any case with ease. He is a dedicated advocate for
Standard Tech. He pushes in Standard Tech in his area and sets an example
by his own flawless performance.
STANDARD TECH
The way a Class VIII gets in Standard Tech is by encouraging lower
classed Auditors to use the materials of Standard Tech and apply them.
A Class VIII must beware of invalidating lower classed Auditors and
make sure he doesn't fall into that trap. Invalidation never works and is
in fact destructive. Under invalidation an Auditor will cease to audit
well, will goof and back off from auditing entirely.
To get in Standard Tech, always encourage lower level Auditors to apply
standard materials, tapes, HCO Bs and books. Help them to do so. Direct
them to the references. See they get crammed, not invalidated. After all,
they are willing to help, or they wouldn't be Auditors.
SUMMARY
Class VIII is the standard by which other auditing is judged. Class
VIII gives the certainty and precision of 100% Standard Tech. Class VIIIs
get in Standard Tech by encouraging lower level Auditors to apply standard
materials, never by invalidation.
Every Auditor should one day make it to Class VIII. No org can afford
to be without at least one Class VIII. These are the Custodians of Standard
Tech.
LRH: RS:nt jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 FEBRUARY 1975
Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats (Cancels: HCO B 25 Feb 72
BTB 25 Feb 72
HCO B 25 Feb 72 Canc. 26 Jan 75)
L10 PREREQUISITES
L10 is not restricted to only those who have completed OT III.
The only prerequisites to L10 are a completed Drug RD and Expanded
Grades. It may not be done between R6EW and OT III, however.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 NOVEMBER 1957RA
REVISED 10 MAY 1974
REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1975
Remimeo
AN OBJECTIVE RUNDOWN
(Note: The original issue from which this HCO B was taken was not
titled "Objectives" but "Intensive Processes for Use in Operation Clear and
Operation Staff Clear". The original was unsigned. It was a Confidential
staff only issue. When converted to an HCO B, the title was changed
erroneously to "Objectives". A corrected list of Objectives is therefore
published below. Additionally, the original issue omitted two or three key
objective processes and put recall [subjective] processes in their place,
thus messing up ARC Straight Wire.)
OBJECTIVE: (Dictionary Definition) "Of or having to do with a material
object as distinguished from a mental concept, idea or belief." Means here
and now objects in PT. As opposed to "Subjective".
SUBJECTIVE: (Dictionary Definition 2nd meaning) "Proceeding from or
taking place in an individual's mind."
Look around or physical contact processes are obviously "Objective".
Recall, think, remember or return on the time track processes are obviously
"Subjective".
Pcs who have been on drugs obviously have to be run on Objective, not
Subjective, processes.
Anyone can be brought more into present time with Objective processes.
Objectives are vital in assists and other areas of processing.
Here is a list of workable Objective processes:
0. "Look at me who am I?"
1. CCH 0
2. CCH 1
3. CCH 2
4. CCH 3
5. CCH 4
6. CCH 1 to 4 repeat as indicated.
7. Locational ("Look at that object") can be used as indicated, to end
sessions or even to bridge from one process to another.
8. The following three must be run 1 command each consecutively over and
over:
(a) "Look around here and find something really real to you."
(b) "Look around here and find something you could go into
communication with."
(c) "Look around here and find something you would really
like."
9. The following three are run several times for the 1st, fewer for the
2nd, fewer for the 3rd. And then repeated (Trio).
(a) "Look around here and tell me what you could have."
(b) "Look around here and tell me what you would permit to remain
in place."
(c) "Look around here and tell me with what you could dispense."
10. Op Pro by Dup to Exterior.
(If pc exteriorizes a Dn C/S 1 and an Interiorization RD [flawless]
should follow.)
The first 10 steps above could be called an Objective Rundown.
Note that this does not include many other Objective processes, many
versions of havingness.
But the above would accomplish a great deal for the pc IF DONE
CORRECTLY WITH FLAWLESS TRs!
And it would accomplish the general intent of the 1957 RD.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: nt.rd
Copyright � 1957, 1974, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1965R
REVISED 24 FEBRUARY 1975
Remimeo
All Students
MUTTER TR
NAME: Mutter TR.
PURPOSE: To perfect muzzled auditing comm cycle.
COMMANDS: "Do fish swim?" "Do birds fly?"
POSITION: Student and coach sit facing each other a comfortable distance
apart.
TRAINING STRESS:
1. Coach has student give command.
2. Coach mutters an unintelligible answer at different times.
3. Student acknowledges.
4. Coach flunks if student does anything else but
acknowledge.
(Note. This is the entirety of this Drill. It is not to be confused with
any other Training Drill. )
Note. The whole trick in TR 2 and TR 4 is that it means one understands
that the pc has said something or has answered. There is no demand the
auditor understand the meaning in the pc's answer in muzzled auditing. In
the above drill the coach just mutters or nods and looks wise instead of
saying anything comprehensible. The only kind of auditing where you must
grab the actual sense of the answer is in listing or in looking for
something that will blowdown or trying to find out what the pc thinks is
wrong. If the pc has said something he wants the auditor to really grasp,
let him explain and of course, if the pc insists, grasp it. But this is
rare and happens only when the pc is already ARC Broken. Otherwise the
above is the right way to do it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: rs.rd
Copyright � 1965, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
DIANETICS TODAY
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published March 1975
Here, on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the First Book, Dianetics: The
Modern Science of Mental Health, is what might be called the Third Book of
Dianetics-Dianetics Today.
The Second Book, Dianetics '55!, took all the problems presented by
Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health and brought them up to 1
January 1955 and handled them, using Two-Way Communication, ARC and the Six
Basic Processes and leading into Route One of The Creation of Human
Ability. Dianetics 1950 techniques handled the problem of the reactive mind
by reducing its constituent engrams, locks and secondaries until it could
be handled by the existing analytical mind. Dianetics '55! handled the same
problem by increasing the ability of the thetan (or, you could say,
analytical mind) to the point where he could be separated from his reactive
mind and body; and then, using Scientology's Intensive Procedure,
processing him until he was capable of handling with great ease any
quantity of aberration in the reactive mind.
With the advent of the Gradation Chart in the mid-60's and Scientology
Levels, all processing techniques fell into place in a smooth gradient from
aberrated homo sapiens, through homo novis and on through Clear and up the
OT Grades.
In Dianetics Today we have "Standard Dianetics"-a space-age Dianetics:
simple and dependably effective on all cases as done by all Hubbard
Standard Dianetic Auditors.
This book contains ALL the essentials of Dianetic Auditing in large, easy-
to-read print easy to understand with the use of its excellent glossary.
1098 pages, illustrated, 33 LRH personally C/Sed sessions, Dianetic Axioms,
bibliography, Dianetic Tape list, abbreviations list, glossary, index.
Available from your nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct
from the publishers: Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6,
1608 Copenhagen V, Denmark; or Church of Scientology Publications
Organization U.S., 2723 West Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90026,
U.S.A.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1975
Remimeo
EXT AND ENDING SESSION
When a pc exteriorizes on a good win in session or if the pc has a big
win, usually followed by a persistent F/N, the usual action is to end
session.
When ending session in these circumstances the Auditor must not do any
other action, but smoothly end session.
This includes asking Say or Ask, running Havingness or anything other
than smoothly ending session.
LRH:nt rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1975
Remimeo
Cramming Series 15
METER USE IN QUAL
All Cramming actions done in Qual must be done on a meter. This means
metered Why Finding, checks for misunderstoods, scouting for areas of
uncertainty, completion of clay demos and word clearing.
Neglect of the full use of the meter has led to half done, ineffective
and often repeat Cramming cycles as the person's why or M/U was never found
in the first place. Even worse, a wrong why can act as a wrong list item
which brings about case chaos.
Every Cramming Officer must know and use all his tools. This includes
metering.
The meter reveals all.
Use it.
LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RB
(Cancels HCO B 24 Nov 1973, Rev. 12 Nov 1974)
Revised & Reissued 22 March 1975
Remimeo
C/S Series 53RJ
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
This is the basic prepared list used by Auditors to get a TA up or down
into normal range. A GF Method 5 may also be used after TA is in normal
range to get pc's case handled better.
____________________________________PC Name_____________________ Date
1. Assess pc Method 5 on this sheet. (Go down the list calling off the
items to the pc, watching the meter. Mark any Tick, SF, F,, LFBD [to
what TA], Speeded Rise or Blow Up.) NOTE: A C/S 53RJ should be
reassessed and all reads handled until it F/Ns on assessment.
A. Interiorization _________ Have others committed _________
Went in _________ overts on others _________
Go in _________ Not saying _________
Can't get in _________ Problems _________
Want to get out _________ Protest _________
Kicked out of spaces _________ Don't like it _________
Can't go Audited over out ruds _________
Feel sad _________
B. List errors _________ Rushed _________
Overlisting _________ Tired _________
Wrong items _________ ARC Brk _________
Upset with giving _________ Upset _________
items to auditor _________ Can't get it
Wrong date _________
Wrong location _________ D. Drugs _________
Wrong Why _________ LSD _________
Wrong Indication _________ Alcohol _________
Wrong PTS Item _________ Pot _________
Medicine _________
C. Some sort of W/H _________
Are you withholding E. Engram in restimulation _________
Something _________ Same engram run twice _________
Is another withholding Can't see engrams too
something from you _________ well _________
Are others withholding Invisible _________
something from others _________ Black _________
False withhold _________ Loss _________
Withholds gotten off Lost _________
more than once _________
Has another committed F. Same thing run twice _________
overts on you _________ Same action done by
Have you committed another auditor _________
any overts _________
G. Doing something with K. Can't have _________
mind between sessions _________ Low havingness _________
Some other practice _________
L. PTS _________
H. Word Clearing errors _________ Suppressed _________
Study errors _________
M. Something went on too
I. False TA _________ long _________
Wrong sized cans _________ Went on by a release
Tired hands _________ point _________
Dry hands or feet _________ Overrun
Wet hands or feet _________ Auditor kept on going _________
Loosens can grip _________ Over-repair _________
Wrong hand cream _________ Puzzled why auditor
keeps on _________
J. Auditor overwhelming _________ Stops _________
Interruptions _________
Feel attacked _________ N. Something else _________
Something wrong with Physically ill _________
F/Ns _________
Overrun F/Ns _________ O. Repairing a TA that
Missed F/N _________ isn't high _________
Items really didn't read _________ Repairing a TA that
False reads _________ isn't low _________
Bad auditing _________ Faulty Meter _________
Incomplete actions _________ Nothing wrong _________
Invalidation _________
Evaluation _________ P. False Exam Report _________
Couldn't get auditing _________ Waited at Exam _________
Upset by Examiner _________
2. Use only the small falls or falls or BDs. The rises will however show
where mass lies.
A. If A or any of the A Group, and the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int
RD Correction List, and handle the reads. (HCO B 29 Oct 71 R, Revised
14 May 74.)
If the pc has never had an Int RD, then give him a standard Int RD
providing you have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and are good at R3R.
B. If any of these read, do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these do an L4BR in general. You
can go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong
Indication or Wrong PTS Item per C/S Series 78.
C. If any of these, handle with 2wc and earlier similar to F/N. If more
than one reads do biggest read first and then clean up each of the
others E/S to F/N. If all read on assessment you have to get an F/N for
each or 20 F/Ns. On overts and withholds, get what, and E/S to F/N. On
out ruds, find which rud and handle. (See GF40RB, HCOB 30 June 71R,
Revised I Dec 74.) Feel sad, handle the ARC Break. (Feel sad = ARC Brk
of long duration.)
D. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N. Complete the Drug RD per
C/S Series 48R after handling all reads on this assessment. If pc has
had a Drug RD, do L3RD on it, and handle.
E. If any of these, do L3RD and handle according to what is stated to do
on L3RD.
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If Yoga or Mystic exercises or some such
2wc E/S it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before
that and if TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If Study errors, 2wc E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List
to the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans. Use HCO Bs 24 Oct 71, 12 Nov 71R, 15 Feb 72,
18 Feb 72, 29 Feb 72R, 23 Nov 73, all on False TA. Then clean up the
bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries, (b)
F/N worries. (2) Then 2wc times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N.
(3) Rehab any overruns due to False TA obscuring F/Ns.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through
an F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be
obscured and mistaken for a read if Sensitivity too high. These items
are all 2wc E/S to F/N. Auditors who made them need Cramming badly or
retread.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness process and remedy.
L. PTS or Suppressed. Check for SP or get a full PTS RD.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each (or date to
blow, locate to blow, if qualified).
N. 2wc to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2wc to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If False TA handle per I
above.
P. Indicate and 2wc to F/N.
General. Handle Int RD (A) if it reads at all before handling rest as
nothing will go right if Int is still out. For the remainder prefer to
handle any BD group if you get a BD. If in doubt about what to do, return
to the C/S.
Revised by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1973,1974, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 MARCH 1975
Remimeo
DIET, THEORY OF A
NATURAL DIET
Food, lack of it, incorrect planning or consumption of it or
substitution or alteration of it can vastly affect health.
Man is not a primary converter of natural energy or masses but depends
upon other converters for a primary conversion in most cases. (Except for
Vitamin D and one or two other items Man, for instance, does not convert
sunlight to energy, but, eating algae which does so convert, is able to
obtain and use the energy.)
No real study of or search for the natural diet of Man has ever been
made or attempted. Studies are made of diets from the viewpoint of how to
correct illnesses or maintain health but not what the basic food of the
human body would be. Scarcities, availabilities, what can be grown and
preserved, the ease of growing, climatic and soil and water conditions, and
how to make a profit are factors which have established diet instead of
"What does the human body require?"
The human body is a complex biological carbon-oxygen engine, running at
an operating temperature of 37� Centigrade and, being biological, has the
ability to establish and repair itself. To its food requirements then are
added the elements required to build as well as to run the body.
Almost all mammals live about 6 times their period of growth. Man lives
only 3.33 times his growth period. As other mammals than Man are under the
same or greater stress but are usually uniform in diet while healthy it can
be assumed that Man has departed from his natural diet.
Some guesses have been made as to natural diet by an examination of
teeth but this would not be an adequate approach.
The resolution of Man's natural diet as opposed to what he is eating
might do a very great deal to improving racial health.
Man's mass efforts towards diet are targeted for quantity and profit.
Efforts to establish quality are often resisted by various special
interests in the mistaken idea that further knowledge of diet might reduce
quantity and profit. However it could be that new food discoveries would
vastly increase both production quantity potential and profit.
No simple basis for research and discovery of the natural diet exists
in known statement form. The necessary first steps to the discovery of
Man's correct diet would be:
(a) The statement of a possibility that one might have existed or did
exist.
(b) A formula for search and possible discovery of it.
This HCO B has made (a) above.
The following would be a formula for its discovery.
OVERWEIGHT: Residual elements of food, substances or gases which are
not totally eliminated or utilized by the body after ingestion.
UNDERWEIGHT OR DEBILITY: Inadequate or lacking foods, substances or gases
which are needed for the activity, maintenance or repair of the body.
By listing all foods, substances or gases which are stored by the body,
one would obtain a list of things ingested, part of which were not utilized
or necessary. Simple recording of those items which put on unwanted weight
would be a part of this action. The examination of overweight persons and
their diets would give another section of it. Further examination of
cadavers that had been overweight would round out the list. Which of these
were the result of body conversion of what food would be noted.
A study and listing of all deficiency diseases and malnutrition causes
as contained in The Textbook of Medicine, Beeson and McDermott, pages 1139-
1201 and in other papers and texts would give a list of items vital to the
activity, maintenance and repair of the body.
The items in the overweight and debility lists could then be compared.
One would then have, as a result, the elements of a natural diet.
A search for foods which contained only the elements which were used
and vital could be undertaken.
The result would be the elements of a possible natural diet.
An examination of the ease of production and supply of such foods could
then result in a practical natural diet.
Zonal application in specific areas might require the repetition of the
formula to take in racial or climatic or production variables.
SUMMARY
It is said at this time that 80% of Americans are overweight. Their
activity and intelligence are failing. The populations of many countries
are starving or suffering malnutrition.
The wild animals, fish and fowl are ceasing to be a world source of
food supply. There is no reason to go on killing off all life on the planet
simply because no one knows, beyond opinion or taste, what Man's natural
food was or could be.
Fads and hobbies should not be the sole source of data on this subject.
The problem could be intelligently solved and should be if we are still
to have a populated planet.
Probably the planet could support billions more than it does. Most of
it is wasteland.
A system pushed by David Rockefeller and others to solve it by killing
off populations through sterilizing and euthanasia is simply impractical,
stupid and useless suppression.
It would be a far better line to work out Man's natural diet.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 MARCH 1975
FLAG ORDER 2186R
Ship Captains
MO's Hat
AO Qual Hats
ANTI-BIOTICS,
ADMINISTERING OF
(This Cancels FO 2313 "Antibiotics,
Further Data" and Revises FO 2186.)
(Note: This data is given for information alone and
is not intended to prescribe or otherwise treat an
individual. All prescriptions and treatments should
be done in due accordance with the medical laws
of any country in which a person seeks treatment.)
There are several "anti-biotics". These are moulds or chemical
compounds which cause bacteria, germs, to be unable to reproduce themselves
(hits their 2D) while not destroying the cells of the body. At least that
is one of the leading theories of why they work. "Anti-biotic" means anti =
against, biotic = living beings (such as bacteria). So it's against bugs.
Disease is said to be caused by germs or virus. Germs are microscopic
cells which breed and have a bad effect on body cells and fluids. Virus is
a germ that is too small to be seen in a microscope. Thus there are germ
infections and virus infections.
Usually one type of germ equals one disease, i.e. typhoid fever.
However, an illness can be a compound of several types of germs but this is
not usual.
Virus diseases respond very badly to most anti-biotics. In fact, in the
presence of penicillin, a virus sort of suspends action without any real
temperature change while the penicillin is present and gets busy again when
the penicillin is gone.
The effect of most anti-biotics on virus is zero. Some claims are made
for some against virus. Measles is a virus illness.
So anti-biotics are mainly effective against germs. Venereal disease,
pneumonia, wound infections and a long parade of diseases can be cured by
anti-biotics.
When illness is accompanied by temperature, anti-biotics is usually the
first thought.
Anti-biotics can however be GROSSLY MISADMINISTERED and in fact usually
are even in hospitals.
The trick is to get the temperature subnormal with anti-biotics within
the blood leveling period. Blood leveling means when the anti-biotic has
gotten into the blood and is actually holding the infection (stopping the
bacteria's "2D" from continuing). More of the same anti-biotic is given
approx 2 hours prior to blood leveling time. This then brings the
temperature right on down to subnormal; continue the anti-biotic so that it
keeps the temperature subnormal until it just can't keep it subnormal any
more and it comes up to normal. It will be found that the patient is now
well and not likely to relapse. If blood leveling time is reached (the time
is always stated on the instructions and contraindications write-up) and
the temperature continues to rise, you have not used the correct anti-
biotic and must at this point change to another kind of anti-biotic.
Each anti-biotic has its own blood leveling time: Penicillin is 24 hours,
Gephaloridine is 8 hours, Streptomycin is 6 hours, etc.
Before administering anti-biotics you must ensure that you know exactly
what toxicity it is (toxic or poisonous quality the anti-biotic has to the
patient). For example Streptomycin can cause pregnant mothers to give birth
to children who have impaired hearing. Renal (kidneys; having to do with
them) damage can be caused by certain anti-biotics if the person has too
much of a certain kind of anti-biotic. Therefore, prior to administering
any kind of anti-biotic ensure that you know the patient's full medical
history, as well as knowing exactly what the toxicity of the anti-biotic is
so that you do not damage the patient.
If not enough anti-biotic is given or if it is the wrong kind for that
disease the temperature will not be heavily affected or at best sinks to
normal without going subnormal. This condition can go on and on and on and
the patient relapses.
Also if anti-biotics are given too briefly the temperature goes to
subnormal, the anti-biotic ceases to be given, the patient feels better,
then probably relapses-gets ill all over again.
The above important three error situations are:
NOT ENOUGH
WRONG KIND
STOPPED TOO SOON.
To these can be added:
GIVEN TOO IRREGULARLY.
This last is almost always present when you give the patient the
bottle. This is a common medical error. The patients aren't doctors, seldom
take the medicine correctly and often not at all. Anti-biotics should be
handed out and seen taken.
Where there is a large number ill, the times can be standardized for
the group. For instance all get it at 3:00 to 3:30, 9:00 to 9:30, etc. Or
even 3 hourly can be done this way.
One takes the temperature before giving the pill. (A glass of water or
a cigarette before temperature taking gives a false report.) Also in this
way one can increase or decrease the dose depending on what the temperature
was.
In very sick cases one has to watch the temperature more closely. In
this way every time the temperature starts to rise from the subnormal where
you are holding it, you immediately dose the patient.
An anti-biotic all by itself cannot depress temperature. It's the
reaction of the disease and body that's doing that.
TEMPERATURE
98.6�F or 37�C is normal. A thermometer can be a bit off (.1 or .2 high
or low) and temperature can vary a bit for "normal" one person to the next.
Rising temperature (above normal) is a reaction to a disease. Lowered
temperature (below normal) is a reaction to a disease being handled by the
body or the anti-biotic plus the body.
100�F or 37.8�C is well above normal and is a sick temperature. 104�F
or 40.5�C is dangerously (possible die) high.
97�F or 36.2�C is very satisfactorily subnormal.
Temperature rise is probably a body mechanism to bum up a disease,
possibly not. But a slight temperature, a few tenths high, can make a
person feel really bad. Then when it gets up higher they feel drifty and
with it very high go delirious.
A subnormal temperature doesn't much affect how one feels.
"Chills" come with high temperature.
ADMINISTERING DOSES
The general rule when administering anti-biotics is:
1. One gives anti-biotics until the temperature comes down past normal
to subnormal and comes up to normal again with anti-biotics.
After blood leveling time of the first anti-biotic the temperature
should break (go normal or below), the person going into a sweat. If it
doesn't, then it's either not enough anti-biotic or the wrong kind.
2. After dosage if the temperature just came down a bit from where it
was, that type of anti-biotic probably will handle the illness but enough
has not been given. Increase the amount being given.
If after blood leveling time from the first anti-biotic the temperature
did not go lower or even rose, it's the wrong anti-biotic. You change off
to another and start all over again.
TAKING EFFECT
The blood leveling period of an anti-biotic is always stated on the
write-up of the anti-biotic (in the box accompanying the anti-biotic). The
second administration is usually given 2 hours prior to the blood leveling
period. Thus if the blood leveling period is 8 hours the second dose is
given 6 hours after the first dose. Take the temperature before the dose
and within the next 2 hours take the temperature again and you will know
whether the anti-biotic is working as the temperature should now be
leveling and/or falling.
If the temperature has not leveled or dropped at this period change the
antibiotic. When giving anti-biotics FO 2187 "Medical Charts" must be
followed. If you don't have a medical chart you don't know and can't see
how the anti-biotic is working.
PAST MALADMINISTRATION
If a person in the past has been treated wrongly with anti-biotics,
i.e. got taken off as soon as temperature reached normal and was not
continued as by rule 1 or 2, the germ remains dormant and the area may
reinfect at a later date.
If more anti-biotics are then administered the temperature will go
subnormal and then to normal with the anti-biotic.
In other words, the cycle will complete. At this point the germ has
been killed.
SESSIONS
Before any session, a heavy dose of vitamins should be given, if the
person is on anti-biotics.
KEY PROCEDURE
When the temperature goes subnormal keep it subnormal until it just
won't stay down with the person still taking the anti-biotic. The patient
will then be well.
The faster you can get the temperature subnormal the better.
SIDE EFFECTS
Anti-biotics have side effects, often very bad.
A patient can be allergic to a certain anti-biotic, meaning he goes
red, gets hives, has bad reactions in varying degrees of severity. If so
get him on another anti-biotic now.
You can test for allergy by scratching the skin and putting a dab of
anti-biotic on it (not the sugar or protective covering) on a Band-Aid.
After a while if the person is allergic to it the area will get red and
puffy. This is not usually done unless you are being super cautious.
The Chloro___and Aureo___families can affect the sense of balance and
early preparations destroyed the sense of balance forever.
All oral anti-biotics sooner or later give the patient a stomach ache
and indigestion. So they should be taken with milk or after a meal, never
with just water.
The longer you keep them on an anti-biotic the harder it is on the
patient's system.
The operating rule is give enough of the right kind to get a fast cure.
If you started on the wrong kind get them on the right kind the moment
you detect the error.
DISEASE CYCLES
Diseases have their own cycles of action and time periods if not given
anti-biotics. Some run for days, some for weeks, some for a lifetime.
Gonorrhea for instance lasts a year in a man, five years in a woman.
Syphilis has its own cure, not an anti-biotic, which is "Ehrlich's Magic
Bullet", neoarsphenamine, Preparation 606, which is a one-shot cure if done
right and only kills I out of 10,000. Syphilis untreated is a lifetime
cycle and drives one crazy, the condition being known as "paresis". Perhaps
modern anti-biotics will include it as curative.
Pneumonia runs about 6 weeks on its own if the patient lives.
These disease cycles do not hold true when anti-biotics are used. They
take as long to cure as it takes to slam the temperature to subnormal and
hold it there until it can't be held any longer. 24 to 36 hours is the new
cycle for lighter illnesses treated with properly dosed correct anti-
biotics.
More serious diseases require longer but mostly because the areas they
infect have poorer blood circulation (such as bone infections).
SULFA DRUGS
The oldest anti-biotics are the sulfa drugs. These are white tablets
usually. Enterovioform for stomach illness is a sulfa drug. They have a
very heavy side effect of dizziness and sometimes delusion (spiders on the
wall).
Sulfathiazole is usually now used as a powder to pour in open wounds
and it and its brother sulfas are the only ones that can be used
"topically" which means as a surface treatment (as different from
internal).
They follow when taken internally all the rules of anti-biotic
administration.
"Gerontal", a trade name for a water-soluble sulfa, is excellent in
kidney infections if the rules of anti-biotics are followed. It needs large
quantities.
You can fall back on sulfa when all else fails.
Sulfas are chemical compounds.
PENICILLIN
Penicillin is the first of the anti-biotics made from mould (as in
mouldy bread, etc.).
It is the USUAL anti-biotic.
It is growing less effective due to diseases getting used to it and
medical misadministration of it.
A disease treated with an anti-biotic which is not cured, when
communicated to another body becomes able in the new body to resist
treatment. Thus new anti-biotics are continually searched for.
However, penicillin is the basic, usual, anti-biotic to use.
ORAL penicillin is not only WORTHLESS but dangerous in that it has
never cured anything yet. Taking it by mouth doesn't work and I don't know
why companies sell it. Stomach juices kill it.
Penicillin has to be SHOT with a needle. Procaine penicillin in I cc or
2 cc amounts, shot into the buttocks with the person lying down on his face
(muscles relaxed), lasts for 24 hours when a 2nd shot is given. Other types
of penicillin can also work this way. Ordinary penicillin however has to be
shot every 3 hours! Read the literature carefully.
There is a 2nd type, "G", for people allergic to the first type (2
types so one can be used if somebody is allergic to the other). If somebody
is allergic to it, it's pretty awful.
If a shot of 24 or 36 hour penicillin hasn't worked in 8 hours to
reduce the temperature at least somewhat use some other anti-biotic at
once.
Penicillin is no good even when shot for stomach or bowel complaints
like dysentery. It is excellent for other types of bacterial infection. It
is usually no good for virus infections.
OTHER ANTI-BIOTICS
Chloro____Aureo____Strepto____compounds are offered under a variety of
trade names. The blank fills "mycin" or "mycetin". Kemacetin or some such
spelling is a company trade name for Chloro____. Chlorofin is almost the
same thing.
Read the literature for the strength of each tablet or shot and what it
is good for. You can puzzle this out even in a foreign language.
Follow the literature.
If one doesn't work, another will. Chloro or Aureo___handles dysentery,
stomach and bowel upsets, some viruses and a lot of other things.
VITAMINS
B1 should be given when giving anti-biotics or the patient gets
depressed as all the B1 gets eaten up by anti-biotics, just as alcohol or
sleeping pills eat up B1. 100 mg of B1 a day is an absolute minimum for a
person taking anti-biotics.
B2 is vital to give anyone with stomach and bowel complaints whether he
is on anti-biotics or not.
Vitamin C is excellent for helping colds and infections. 250 mg is the
usual dose a couple times a day. It's much like fruit in that fruit
contains a lot of it. If anyone's teeth or gums get sore push in lots of
Vitamin C.
So B 1 and C are usual along with anti-biotics. B1, C and B2 are vital
to help clear up stomach and bowel complaints along with anti-biotics.
INTESTINAL BACTERIA
Natural intestinal bacteria are vital to digest and handle food. These
all get killed off by oral anti-biotics and must be replaced.
Yoghurt is the usual remedy and one should eat it for several days, a
portion a day after getting well with anti-biotics.
The clever French put these exact bacteria in glass vials for daily
dosage. This does the same thing even better than yoghurt. It is called
"Biolactyl".
Note: Under medical supervision, LRH has been handling anti-biotics as
a ship captain for a long time and has done as well independent biological
research. Some of the data (the use of subnormal temperatures) is not known
to the medical profession but was discovered by Ron in 1952 when he had to
discover it to save an important person's life after two relapses from
doctors using older methods. It has since been proven out by many quick
successes using anti-biotics on ships.
A person treating someone on anti-biotics must go over this HCO B very
carefully as it is very condensed, very precise and means exactly what it
says. When this data is not known some get into long illnesses which are
needless.
A person treating another with anti-biotics has to know many other
things but the above is very vital.
All Div 5 personnel and anyone who will administer anti-biotics must *-
rate M9 M4 in Qual on this HCO B. Medical charts (see FO 2187 "Medical
Charts") must be made up so that, in case of any fever, the person will be
treated standardly to a speedy recovery.
Compiled from the notes of LRH by
Kima Jason
Snr MO Flag
for
LRH:KJ:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 APRIL 1975
Remimeo
Supervisors
Interne Supers
Cramming Officers
Auditors
OUT BASICS AND HOW TO
GET THEM IN
In C/Sing lately I have had spectacular case wins just using basics.
Like getting the Pc in session, F/Ning what was asked not something else,
false TA correction, false reads on W/Hs, catching a forcing of the Pc's
attention onto the meter and his TA, etc, etc.
Just fundamental auditing. And it has sent bogged cases soaring.
Here is a list of the out basics caught which can and did cause "bogs".
Noted with these outnesses are the HCO Bs and BTBs which if known,
understood and applied will correct the outness.
Get flubbing Auditors and C/Ses word cleared, starrate checked out and
drilled on the materials appropriate to the out basic found in his or her
auditing or C/Sing.
1. Auditing preclears in a bad and noisy environment (Auditor doesn't
know he is responsible for the session environment).
Reference:
HCO B 30 Apr 1969 "Auditor Trust"
HCO B 23 May 1971 "Basic Auditing Series 6
Issue VI Auditor Failure to Understand"
BTB 17 July 1969R "Flagrant Auditing Errors"
Issue II
2. Not assessing and handling an ARC Break that came up in the session.
Reference:
HCO B 12 Feb 1966 "The 'Dangerous Auditor' "
HCO B 7 Sept 1964 "PTPs, Overts and ARC Breaks"
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
HCO B 17 Oct 1964 "All Levels-Getting the Pc Sessionable"
HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code"
3. False reads on W/Hs and asking for some W/Hs more than once will ARC
Break the Pc.
Reference:
HCO PL 1 July 1965 "Comm Cycle Additives"
Issue II
HCO B 15 Aug 1969 "Flying Ruds"
BTB 18 Nov 1968R "Model Session"
HCO B 10 July 1964 "Overts-Order of Effectiveness in Processing"
4. Auditing the Pc over:
(a) False TA
Reference:
HCO B 24 Oct 1971 "False TA"
HCO B 26 Oct 1970 "Obnosis and the Tone Scale"
Issue III Reissued 19 Sept 74
HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code"
(b) Pc out of session
Reference:
HCO B 30 Apr 1969 "Auditor Trust"
HCO B 26 Apr 1971 "TRs and Cognitions"
HCO B 7 May 1969 "The Five GAEs"
Issue IV
(c) Int Ext misunderstoods
Reference:
BTB 2 May 1972R "Clearing Commands"
BTB 13 Mar 1973R "Handling Int/Ext"
HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code"
(d) Misunderstoods on basic words
Reference.
HCO B 14 Nov 1965 "Clearing Commands"
BTB 8 Jan 1971 R "Auditing CS-1 for Dianetics and Scientology"
BTB 2 May 1972R "Clearing Commands"
5. Calling the Pc's attention to the meter or TA or his hands in
session.
Reference:
HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" (Clause 17)
HCO B 14 Oct 1968 "You Must Never "
BTB 17 July 1969R "Flagrant Auditing Errors"
Issue II
HCO B 26 Apr 1971 "TRs and Cognitions"
HCO B 23 May 1971 "Basic Auditing Series 11-Metering"
Issue IX
HCO B 3 July 1971 "Scientology III-Auditing by Lists Revised"
6. F/Ning a question on something else, not the question asked.
Reference:
HCO B 21 Sept 1965 "Out Tech"
HCO B 7 Apr 1964 "All Levels-Q & A"
HCO B 7 May 1969 "The Five GAEs"
Issue IV
HCO B 30 Apr 1971 "Auditing Comm Cycle"
HCO B 13 Dec 1961 "Varying Sec Check Questions"
HCO B 20 Nov 1973 "C/S Series 89-F/N What You Ask
Issue II or Program"
HCO B 21 Nov 1973 "The Cure of Q & A"
BTB 23 Dec 1972 "Integrity Processing Series 20
C/Sing Integrity Processing"
HCO B 14 Mar 1971R "F/N Everything"
7. Auditor carrying on past Exterior and good win and asking "say or
ask".
Reference:
HCO B 7 Mar 1975 "Ext and Ending Session"
HCO B 16 Dec 1971RA "C/S Series 35RA-Interiorization Errors"
8. Lack of knowledge of Flows, doing F0s on a Triple Pc.
Reference.
HCO B 12 Jan 1975 "Quads Reinstated"
HCO B 7 Mar 1971 "C/S Series 28RA-1-Use of Quadruple
Reiss 13 Jan 75 Dianetics"
HCO B 4 Apr 71-1R "C/S Series 32RA-1R-Use of Quad Dianetics"
HCO B 5 Apr 1971 "C/S Series 33RA-1-Triple and Quad
Reruns"
Reissued 13 Jan 75
HCO B 21 Apr 71-1R "C/S Series 36RB-1R
Quadruple Dianetics-Dangers Of"
9. Auditor C/Sing in the chair (running an L1C "on post" that wasn't
C/Sed for to handle an ARC Break that just occurred in session).
Reference.
BPL 15 Nov 1969R "Rights and Duties"
Issue II
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
HCO B 19 Mar 1971 "List-1-C-L1C"
BTB 11 Aug 1972RA "C/S Series 83RA-Correction Lists"
10. Auditor doing 2WCs without a C/S (C/Sing in the chair).
Reference:
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
HCO B 3 July 1970 "C/S Series 14-C/Sing 2-Way Comm"
11. False TA.
Reference:
HCO B 24 Oct 1971 "False TA"
HCOB 12 Nov 1971R "False TA Addition"
HCO B 15 Feb 1972 "False TA Addition 2"
HCO B 18 Feb 1972 "False TA Addition 3"
BTB 24 Jan 1973 "Examiner and False TA"
Issue II
HCO B 24 Nov 1973RB "C/S Series 53RJ-Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S"
HCO B 23 Nov 1973R "Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA"
Revised 23 Apr 75
12. Not getting False TA handled before session and TA down with proper
hand cream before trying to audit.
Reference:
HCO B 29 Feb 1972R "False TA Checklist"
13. Applying hand cream during a session.
Reference.
HCO B 29 Feb 1972R "False TA Checklist"
HCO PL 14 Oct 1968 "The Auditor's Code" (Clause 17)
HCOPL 1 July 1965 "Comm Cycle Additives"
Issue II
14. Auditor overrunning due to False TA.
Reference. Same as 4 (a)
15. Not writing down on worksheet what was done.
Reference.
HCO PL 19 Nov 1965 "Auditing Reports"
HCO B 7 May 1969 "Summary of How to Write an
Issue VI Auditor's Report . . ."
BTB 6 Nov 1972R "Auditor Admin Series 14R
Issue VII The Worksheets"
Tape Lecture 12 June 1971 "Flag Qual Interne Introductory Lecture"
Tape Lecture 7 Apr 1972 "Expanded Dianetics Tape No. 3
Auditor Administration"
16. Not writing down vital information in the worksheets.
Reference:
HCO PL 19 Oct 1974 "Urgent-The Dramatization of Withholds on
Vital Information Lines"
BPL 6 Nov 1974 "Obstruction of Vital Technical or Management
Lines-High Crime"
HCO PL 19 Nov 1965 "Auditing Reports" Also see No. 15 References
17. Poor handwriting, illegible worksheets.
Reference:
BTB 6 Nov 1972R "Auditor Admin Series 14R
Issue VII The Worksheets"
Tape Lecture 12 June 1971 "Flag Qual Interne Introductory Lecture"
HCO B 3 Nov 1971 "C/S Series 66-Auditor's Worksheets"
Tape Lecture 7 Apr 1972 "Expanded Dianetics Tape No. 3
Auditor Administration"
BTB 20 July 1974 "Auditor Expertise Drills Series 1
Basic Auditing Drills" ED 19, ED 20
18. C/S not using the D of P for Interview to get data on what's up with
the case when you have a failed session.
Reference:
HCO B 28 Sept 1971 "C/S Series 62-Know Before You Go"
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
19. Repairing the Pc instead of the Auditor-going into a sudden repair in
the middle of an Advance Program.
Reference:
HCO B 9 June 1971 "C/S Series 42-C/S Rules
Issue II Complete Cycles"
HCO B 9 June 1971 "C/S Series 43-C/S Rules
Issue III Trouble for the Pc"
HCO B 6 Dec 1973 "C/S Series 90-The Primary Failure"
HCO B 26 May 1971 "C/S Series 38-TRs Course and Auditing
Mixing Major Actions"
HCO B 31 Mar 1971 "C/S Series 31-Programming and
Misprogramming"
HCO B 15 June 1972 "C/S Series 80-Dog Pcs"
20. Pc doesn't want auditing.
Reference:
The Book of Case Remedies Remedy K
HCO B 11 May 1969 "Forcing a Pc"
HCO B 10 June 1971 "C/S Series 44R-C/S Rules
Issue I Programming from Prepared Lists"
HCO B I Aug 1968 "The Laws of Listing and Nulling"
HCO B 15 Dec 1968R "L4BR for Assessment of All Listing Errors"
21. Agreeing with Pc's demands for the next Grade despite all contrary
indicators.
Reference:
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
HCO B 16 June 1970 "C/S Series 6-What the C/S Is Doing"
HCO B 3 Mar 1969 "Case Gain-Completing Levels"
HCO B 9 June 1971 "C/S Series 42-C/S Rules
Issue II Complete Cycles"
HCO B 26 Aug 1970 "C/S Series 17-Incomplete Cases"
HCO B 19 June 1970 "C/S Series 7-C/S Q & A"
22. Trying to fix "No EP" on one Rundown by trying to run another
Rundown.
Reference:
HCO B 26 May 1971 "C/S Series 38-TRs Course and Auditing
Mixing Major Actions"
HCO B 23 Aug 1971 "C/S Series 1-Auditor's Rights"
HCO B 16 June 1970 "C/S Series 6-What the C/S Is Doing"
HCO B 7 Apr 1964 "All Levels-Q & A"
23. Failing to call for an FES when you don't know after a failed
Rundown.
Reference.
HCO B 6 Oct 1970 "C/S Series 19-Folder Error Summaries"
HCO B 25 June 1970 "C/S Series 11"
24. C/S not reading the worksheets or missing corny errors and not
correcting the Auditor.
Reference:
BTB 30 Nov 1971R "C/S Series 67-The Code of a C/S"
HCO B 15 Nov 1969 "Case Supervision, How it Goes
Issue II Non-Standard"
BPL 15 Nov 1969R "Rights and Duties"
Issue II
HCO B 22 Sept 1971 "C/S Series 61-The Three Golden Rules of the
C/S"
HCO B 3 Nov 1971 "C/S Series 66-Auditor's Worksheets"
HCO B 25 Sept 1974 "Urgent-Important-C/S Series 94
Reduction of Refunds-C/Ses and Overload"
HCO B 10 Nov 1970 "C/S Series 21-C/S Responsibility for
Training"
HCO B 16 Aug 1972 "C/S Series 84-Flubless C/Sing"
_________
I am catching C/Ses for real big actions on top of these corny out
basics. Errors in Tech are OUT BASICS.
You don't have to figure figure on Cloud 89 on what's wrong when the Pc
simply hasn't picked up the cans!
I bet a lot of cases would go like a shot on just basics!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt jh
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1975
Remimeo
Tech & Qual
All Levels
All Auditors
VANISHING CREAM AND FALSE TA
Ref: HCO B 24 Oct 71 "False TA"
HCO B 12 Nov 71R "False TA Addition"
HCO B 15 Feb 72 "False TA Addition 2"
HCO B 18 Feb 72 "False TA Addition 3"
HCO B 29 Feb 72RA "False TA Checklist"
HCO B 23 Nov 73R "Dry and Wet Hands
Make False TA"
After further and more extensive tests vanishing creams have proven
unsuitable as a solution to dry hands.
In some cases vanishing creams have actually dried out pcs' hands and
caused a false high TA.
Vaseline Intensive Care Lotion has proven very workable when applied to
a pc's hands, rubbed in and any excess wiped off.
Another cream called Locorten was also found workable but it contains
cortisone which burns the eyes if you rub them with your hands. Further
tests are underway on Locorten without cortisone but these are not yet
complete.
Another hand cream formula was found 90% effective upon test and is
somewhat similar to the Locorten formula without cortisone. Its formula is:
75 grams Emulsified Cetomacrofolis Wax
(80% cetostearyl alcohol and
20% cetomacrofol 1000)
100 grams Cetyl Alcohol
20 grams Sorbitol Solution 70%
1 gram Sorbic Acid up to
500 grams water
You could have this cream made up by any pharmacist.
A NOTE ON FOOTPLATES
Footplates generally give a wrong TA position and obscure F/Ns and
reads.
They are not recommended except as a last resort where the pc cannot
use cans.
FALSE TA HANDLING
It has never been OK to call a pc's attention to his hands or TA or
meter during a session. Therefore when handling a false TA get the TA in
range with hand cream or can size or grip before session.
Don't check for hand cream or can grip or change cans during the
session except as directed on correction lists such as a C/S Series 53RJ
under false TA.
Otherwise it throws the pc out of session and puts his attention on his
TA.
Use the session for auditing.
LRH:rs.ldv.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1975 Founder
by L Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1973R
Remimeo REVISED 23 APRIL 1975
Tech & Qual
All Levels
All Auditors
DRY AND WET HANDS
MAKE FALSE TA
A couple of years ago some auditors were solving high TA problems by
putting hand cream on the pc's hands when they were calloused and talcum
powder on a pc's hands when they were too wet. Since no research had been
done they were censured.
Research has now been done on this matter of dry and wet hands.
Apparently when a person has taken certain medicines or chemicals, or
uses detergent soaps or is in contact with certain chemicals (such as those
in some furniture polishes) the ordinary skin oils vanish. These oils are
needed to make an electrical contact with the cans.
When these oils are absent, there is no adequate electrical contact and
the "TA is High".
When a person is deficient in certain minerals or vitamins such as
magnesium or B Complex, his hands can be excessively wet.
Either of these two conditions in hands or feet can produce an
incorrect TA position.
The dry condition produces a false high TA.
The overly wet condition produces a false low TA.
The TA depends on normally moist hands. This does not mean the meter
works on "sweat". It does mean the meter works only when there is a correct
electrical contact.
Too much and too greasy hand cream could produce too low a TA.
Vanishing creams don't work as they are found to actually dry out the
skin after repeated application and so produce a falsely high TA.
Too much powder or drier could produce too high a TA.
Therefore one must not go to extremes.
DRY HANDS
The excessively "dry" hand is seen as shiny or polished looking. It
feels very dry.
The correct treatment is to use a hand cream such as Vaseline Intensive
Care Lotion (obtainable from any cosmetics store) not a greasy hand cream
or vanishing cream.
A good hand cream rubs all the way into the skin and leaves no excess
grease.
This restores normal electrical contact.
Such a hand cream would only have to be applied once per session-at
session start-as it lasts for a long while. Hand cream is never applied
during session.
This would apply to some footplate cases as well (whose hands are
defective or too heavily calloused).
If a cream leaves smears on a can, it is too heavily applied or too
little absorbed.
Hand cream is usually smeared on, rubbed in and can then be thoroughly
wiped off. The hands (or feet) will usually produce, then, a normal TA and
meter response.
WET HANDS
Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are many brands
of these, often a powder or spray.
It can be wiped off after application and should work for two or three
hours.
It can be applied to hands or feet (for footplates).
If the TA then goes too high, use hand cream on top of it.
SUMMARY
While much work could be done still, the above is enough for a
practical result.
WARNING
Hi TAs and Lo TAs do not widely F/N. If you are getting wide persistent
F/N with the TA too high (above 3) or too low (below 2) you have a pc whose
hands are too dry or too wet. Using this HCO B should correct it and in
future sessions you should continue the remedy on that pc.
NOTHING in this HCO B excuses the misreading or falsifying of a TA. Get
the TA in normal range with this HCO B before you start calling processes
ended.
C/S 53RJ and the False TA checklist HCO B 29 Feb 1972RA, Revised 23 Apr
75, are your tools for handling too high and too low TAs.
The only other conditions I know of that make an auditor mess up a pc's
TA are:
(a) A discharged meter (registers high).
(b) An incorrectly set meter by trim button.
(c) A "fleeting F/N" where the pc F/Ns so briefly the auditor
misses it and overruns.
(d) Bad TRs.
(e) Unflat processes.
(f) Overrun processes.
(g) Heavy drugs or medicines.
False TA often comes to light when the auditor runs out of reasons it
is high or low and it dawns on him that he is dealing with false TA. In the
latter case he should know all MATERIALS ON THIS SUBJECT OF FALSE TA (given
on HCO B 29 Feb 1972RA, Revised 23 Apr 75, as references) AND REMEDY THE
FALSE TA SITUATION AND THEN RESUME NORMAL AUDITING. He must not go on
calling high or low TA F/Ns just by assuming the TA is false.
Given a contact the meter always tells the truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:clb.rs.ldv.jh.rd
Copyright � 1973, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 FEBRUARY 1972RA
Tech & Qual REVISED 23 NOVEMBER 1973
All Levels REVISED 23 APRIL 1975
All Auditors
FALSE TA CHECKLIST
Ref: HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA
HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition
HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2
HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3
BTB 24 Jan 73 II Examiner and False TA
HCO B 24 Nov 73 C/S 53RJ
HCO B 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands
Make False TA
The following are the items to be checked by an auditor on any pc. It
need only be done once unless the check itself is suspected false, or if
conditions of the pc's hands, etc change.
The checklist is kept in the pc folder and is entered on the folder
summary as an action done.
The value of operating with correct can size should not be
underestimated, the reference HCO Bs state why.
The auditor signs and answers the following points on the checklist,
and gets answers from the pc where needed.
_________
R-Factor to pc: "We are going to check the cans and adjust them to get
the best accuracy."
1. Is the meter charged fully? _________
2. Is the meter trimmed correctly? _________
3. Are the leads connected to the meter and cans? _________
4. Are the cans rusty? _________
5. Are pc's hands excessively dry requiring hand cream? _________
6. Are the pc's hands excessively wet requiring powder? _________
7. The pc is NOT being told continually to wipe his hands?
_________
8. The pc's grip on the cans is NOT being continually checked by
the auditor in a way that interrupts the pc? _________
9. TA position on large cans? _________
Size approx 4 7/8 inches by 2 5/8 inches or 121/2 cm by 7 cm
10. TA position on medium cans? _________
Size approx 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 cm by 5 cm
11. TA position on small cans? _________
Size approx 2 inches by 1 3/16 inches or 5 cm by 3 cm
12. Are the cans too large for pc? _________
13. Are the cans too small for pc? _________
14. Are the cans just right in size? _________
15. Are the cans cold? _________
16. Are the pc's hands dry or calloused? _________
17. Does the pc have arthritic hands? _________
18. TA position on foot plates? _________
(Foot plates are used and TA checked on them when the answer
to 16 & 17 is affirmative.)
19. Are the pc's feet calloused or excessively wet or dry? _________
20. Does the pc loosen his grip on the cans? _________
21. Check the pc's grip, does he hold the cans correctly? _________
(See E-Meter Drill 5.)
22. Is the pc hot? _________
22A Is the pc well slept? _________
23. Is the pc cold? _________
23A Is the pc hungry? _________
24. Is it too late at night? _________
25. Is auditing being done not in the pc's normal regular awake hours?
_________
26. Are there rings on the pc's hands? _________
27. Is the pc wearing tight shoes? _________
28. Is the pc wearing tight clothes? _________
29. Is it actually chronic High or Low TA case condition? _________
30. Has the pc gone into despair over his TA? _________
The handling of these points is stated in the reference HCO Bs.
The handling of high or low TA after checking these points is by C/S
53RJ, Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S.
The way to be sure of a C/S 53RJ or Hi-Lo TA list is by continued
assessment and handling of these lists until an F/N on assessment is
gotten.
So standard tech handles the high and low TA. The C/S Series gives more
data on the subject.
Compiled by Flag XIIs
for Training & Services Bureau
Revised by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:BL:JW:nt jh.rd
Copyright �1972, 1973, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1961RA
REVISED 30 MAY 1975
Remimeo
JOHANNESBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST
-REVISED
(Revised to exclude "represent" questions which were L&N type actions
and could cause upset in the event of a wrong item. If a pc lists to a
question the rules of L&N apply.)
This is the Johannesburg Confessional List further amplified by
myself. This is the roughest Confessional List in Scientology. We will
call it the "Jo'burg Confessional". It does not necessarily replace other
Confessional Lists but it is probably the most thorough one we have now.
In reprinting this form use legal (foolscap) length and double-space
everything except directions.
It must be done by a person qualified per HCO PL 13 November 1974, "HCO
May Do Confessional Lists". Every reading item must be F/Ned.
JOBURG CONFESSIONAL LIST
HCO Confessional Form 2
Name of Person Date _________________
Name of Auditor/HCO Terminal___________________________________________
DlRECTIONS. Attempt to clear any fall observed. Mark any fall observed
or any meter reaction change elicited by the question. Then write what it
cleared on. Mark largely if the fall could not be cleared since this
constitutes a failure to pass. Only fail somebody if there is no needle
motion of any kind even with sensitivity at 16 on any question. If they are
failing because it is hard to clear a question, work very thoroughly on it
in an effort to clear it. In all cases complete the test.
If an important question fails to clear even after Auditor/HCO Terminal
has worked very hard to get it off, the test is flunked.
The following statement should be read or quoted to the person
receiving the Confessional List:
"We are about to begin a Confessional. We are not moralists. We are
able to change people. We are not here to condemn them. While we cannot
guarantee you that matters revealed in this list will be held forever
secret, we can promise you faithfully that no part of it nor any answer you
make here will be given to the Police or the State. No Scientologist will
ever bear witness against you in Court by reason of answers to this
Confessional. This Confessional is exclusively for Scientology purposes.
The only ways you can fail this Confessional are to refuse to take the
test, to fail to answer its questions truthfully or if you are here
knowingly to injure Scientology. The only penalty attached to failure of
this Confessional is our refusal to employ you or issue you a certificate,
and this will only happen if we find you are trying knowingly to injure
Scientology. You can pass this test by (1) agreeing to take it, (2)
answering each question truthfully and (3) not being a member of a
subversive group seeking to injure Scientology."
The first questions are nul questions to determine your reaction pattern.
We will now begin:
Lie Reaction:
A. Are you sitting in a chair?
B. Are you on the Moon?
C. Are all cats black?
D. Am I an ostrich?
E. Is this Earth?
F. Have you ever drunk water?
G. Are you holding up a tree?
H. Am I an elephant?
I. Are you a table?
J. Is this a Confessional List?
_________
1. Have you ever lived or worked under an assumed name?
2. Have you given me your right name?
3. Are you here for a different purpose than you say?
4. Have you ever stolen anything?
5. Have you ever forged someone else's signature?
6. Have you ever blackmailed anybody?
7. Have you ever been blackmailed?
8. Have you ever smuggled anything?
9. Have you ever been in prison?
10. Have you ever indulged in drunkenness?
11. Have you ever done any reckless driving?
12. Have you ever burglared any place?
13. Have you ever embezzled money?
14. Have you ever assaulted anyone?
15. Have you ever been in jail?
16. Have you ever told lies in court?
17. Have you ever had anything to do with Pornography?
18. Have you ever committed Arson?
19. Have you ever been a Drug Addict?
20. Have you ever peddled Dope?
21. Have you had any dealings with stolen goods?
22. Do you have a Police Record?
23. Have you ever raped anyone?
24. Have you ever been involved in an abortion?
25. Have you assisted in any abortion?
26. Have you ever committed adultery?
27. Have you ever practiced Homosexuality?
28. Have you ever had intercourse with a member of your family?
29. Have you ever been sexually unfaithful?
30. Have you ever practiced Sodomy?
31. Have you ever consistently made a practice of sexual perversion?
32. Have you ever slept with a member of a race of another color?
33. Have you ever committed culpable homicide?
34. Have you ever bombed anything?
35. Have you ever murdered anyone?
36. Have you ever kidnapped anyone?
37. Have you ever done any illicit Diamond buying?
38. Have you ever betrayed anyone for money?
39. Have you ever threatened anyone with a firearm?
40. Have you been in illegal possession of firearms?
41. Have you ever been paid for giving evidence?
42. Have you ever destroyed something belonging to someone else?
43. Have you ever been a spy for an Organization?
44. Have you ever had anything to do with Communism or been a
Communist?
45. Have you ever been a newspaper reporter?
46. Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of drugs?
47. Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of alcohol?
48. Have you ever used drugs or alcohol to procure sex?
48a. Have you ever used blackmail to procure sex?
49. Have you ever ill-treated children?
50. Have you ever taken money for giving anyone sexual intercourse?
51. Have you ever had any connection with a brothel?
52. Have you ever had anything to do with a baby farm?
53. Have you ever been a spy for the Police?
54. Are you afraid of the Police?
55. Have you ever done anything you are afraid the Police may find out?
56. Have you ever falsified the books in any firm you worked for?
57. Have you ever done anything your Mother would be ashamed to find out?
58. How could you help yourself generally?
59. Have you committed any overts against yourself?
60. How could you help your family?
61. Have you committed any overts against your family?
62. How do you feel about sex?
63. Have you committed any overts against the org?
63a Have you committed any overts against others?
63b. Have you committed any overts against a group?
64. How could you help the org?
64a. How could you help others?
64b. How could you help a group?
65. How could you help mankind?
66. Have you ever controlled people?
67. How do you feel about being controlled?
68. Have you committed any overts against mankind?
69. How could you help animals and plants?
70. Have you committed any overts against animals and plants?
71. How could you help material things?
72. Have you committed any overts against matter?
72a. Have you committed any overts against energy?
72b. Have you committed any overts against space?
72c. Have you committed any overts against time?
73. How could you help Spirits?
74. Have you committed any overts against Spirits?
75. How could you help God or Infinity?
76. Have you committed any overts against God?
76a. Have you committed any overts against Infinity?
77. What is Communism?
78. Do you feel Communism has some good points?
79. Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
80. Have you ever been a member of any group with similar ideals as the
Communist Party?
81. Do you know any Communist personally?
82. Have you ever injured Dianetics or Scientology?
83. Have you ever committed any overts on a Scientology Organization?
84. Have you ever stolen anything from a Scientology Org?
85. Do you have any overts on LRH?
86. Have you ever had unkind thoughts about LRH?
87. Do you have any overts on Mary Sue?
88. Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Mary Sue?
89. Have you ever injured any Scientologists?
90. Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Scientologists?
91. Have you ever betrayed Scientology?
92. Do you know of any secret plans against Scientology?
93. Have you ever taken money to injure Scientology?
94. Have you ever used Dianetics or Scientology to force sex upon
someone?
95. Do you know of any plans to injure a Scientology Organization?
96. Are you upset about this Confessional List?
_______________________________ ________________________________
Passed Failed
____________________________________________________________________
WHY?
_________________________________
Signed by Examiner
LRH :nt jh L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1961, 1972, 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[The Johannesburg Security Check, HCO PL 7 April 1961, Volume IV, page 242,
was revised on 12 November 1972 as HCO PL 7 April 1961R, Johannesburg
Security Check-Revised, to exclude "represent" questions which were L&N
type actions. The above HCO PL makes further revisions in this type style .
)
DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
TECHNICAL DICTIONARY
by L. Ron Hubbard
Published
June 1975
The Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary is a vital necessity to
all Scientologists.
It contains over 3,000 Dianetic and Scientology words and 7,000 definitions
taken from the 1950-1975 writings and lectures of L. Ron Hubbard, with the
exact source given for each definition so that you can refer to source if
you want more elaboration on the subject.
Every book, tape and bulletin ever published, millions of written and
spoken words, were combed for Dianetic and Scientology words and
definitions and then checked and rechecked.
"The student who is not completely conversant with these exact words as
contained in this dictionary will find himself drowsing over his bulletins
and utterly appalled when he tries to obtain results which are not
forthcoming due to his lack of understanding of some small word."
L. Ron Hubbard-Introduction to the Technical Dictionary.
In addition to giving an understanding of the vocabulary of the subject and
clearing up misunderstood words and abbreviations in connection with
Dianetics and Scientology, there is a further major use for this
dictionary. The student requiring information about any area of Dianetics
or Scientology need only look up the words connected with that area and he
will be provided with references to appropriate material for further study
of that area.
Here is a wealth of knowledge all by itself! Things are defined that Man
searched for for 50,000 years.
592 pages, illustrated, hardcover with dust jacket. Available from your
nearest Scientology Organization or Mission, or direct from the publishers:
Scientology Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V,
Denmark; or Church of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 2723 West
Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90026, U.S.A.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 OCTOBER 1975
Remimeo
All Flag
All Folo Tech Terminals
All Quality Control Personnel
All Qual Personnel
All Tech Personnel
TECHNICAL QUERIES
Over the years we have had a great deal of experience with "Technical
Queries".
Many new trainee Auditors have come to Flag. A certain percentage of
these were very happy to be there because now their "technical queries"
could be "answered". And so my lines would carry their queries and of
course an investigation would ensue to find why an org Class IV or VII
would have technical queries.
IT WAS FOUND IN ALL CASES THAT THE PERSON WITH THE TECHNICAL QUERY HAD
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS OR HAD NEVER READ THE MATERIALS OR LISTENED TO THE
REQUIRED TAPES.
The misunderstood words were things like "Scientology", "Auditor",
"HCO", "tone arm"-things the person was encountering continually in his
work.
EVERY one of these "technical queries" was already fully covered in the
materials but the person had never bothered to clean up his Mis-Us or,
occasionally, read the basic materials available to him.
It was further found that IT WAS ABSOLUTELY FATAL TO TRY TO ANSWER
THESE QUERIES OR EXPLAIN THEM. The explanation given would just dive in
under the misunderstood words or absence of study and the person would just
have more bewildered queries.
So it became the very firm rule on my lines that when technical queries
were received the person was at once metered properly to locate the Mis-U
words and get them defined or the false report that he or she had studied
the materials at all.
When "technical queries" were handled this way and ONLY when they are
handled this way, the result was F/N VVVVVGIs. Any explanation brought only
BIs.
So the rule is very, very firm.
ALWAYS ANSWER A TECHNICAL QUERY BY REFERRAL TO MATERIALS AND A CRAMMING
ORDER TO FIND THE MIS-U WORDS.
The Auditor who is not handled this way will go on failing.
Further, VERBAL tech explanations or letters which explain things enter
a false data line into the scene and drives tech further out. Such actions
create a squirrel scene. So:
NEVER EXPLAIN VERBALLY OR ON PAPER IN ANSWERING A TECHNICAL QUERY. Only
refer to materials and issue cramming orders to find the Mis-Us or the
unstudied materials.
Probably the reason why Flag trained Auditors and Auditors who have
been working on my C/S lines produce such phenomenal results is that the
above two rules are fully enforced wherever I am working.
And it is true-the best Auditors in the world have been made by applying
these rules.
And now that you have the Tech Dictionary it is especially easy.
So DON'T do an Auditor or Student in by explaining the answers to
technical queries. Apply these rules and make them come through on the
original materials.
To do anything else is a severe disservice.
These are the basic rules of keeping tech in.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER AD25
Remimeo
All Students
All HGC Auditors
All C/Ses C/S Series 95
All Internes
"FAILED" CASES
There are no failed cases. There are only failed C/Ses and Auditors.
In a recent test; this was proven conclusively. A number of no-case-
gain, slow- case-gain, sickie and "failed cases" were rounded up. Using
well trained Flag Auditors and the most basic of lists, every one of these
cases was soon flying.
At another time, lists which had been "nulled" by a group of trainee
Auditors were then taken over, on the same pcs, same lists, and renulled by
Class Xs. Over half the reading items had been missed by the trainees-they
simply couldn't make the list read on the pcs. Yet the lists were as alive
as skyrockets. The pcs, under the trainee Auditors, had accumulated all
manner of by-passed charge by having reading items ignored. And in some
cases, having non-reading items given attention.
To a trainee, all this seems incredible and mysterious. He does not
realize how very bad his metering can be, how faint and fainting his TR 1.
He has numerous tricks which defeat him-such as keeping his sensitivity on
32 for a pc who only requires sensitivity 1, whereas the Auditor misses all
his F/Ns as he can't keep the needle at set. He doesn't put his meter so he
can see pc, paper and meter dial all in the same scope of vision and misses
the reads. His Auditor presence is so poor and his attitude so
unprofessional that the pc isn't really in session. His own introversion
prevents him from really observing the pc's tone or reaction.
All these faults can be cured and HAVE to be before an Auditor can call
himself a real Auditor. Short of that he is just a fooling-about
dilettante. And he has "failed pcs".
It takes hard sweating work to get good enough to be a real Auditor. It
takes hours and hours and hours of TRs the hard way. It takes a high degree
of honesty that includes never faking and going by misunderstoods in his
materials, always being honest in his auditing reports, constant practice
with his metering, drills with the tone scale and a large degree of self-
discipline.
It isn't "talent" that makes the good Auditor. It is practice and more
practice until he himself knows first that he didn't know and then knows
that he really knows.
The source of out tech is only laziness and dishonesty. Someone who is
afraid of work thinks he can PR the C/S and the pc, fumble his way through
and succeed out of fakery. That route is failure. And it ends in "failed
cases". Don't be a psychologist or psychiatrist. That was their route.
In the hands of a thoroughly trained and drilled Auditor, Scientology
works and works splendidly.
There are no dog cases, no "ncgs", no failed cases.
But there are "Auditors" who don't study and drill hard enough to
become real Auditors. And there are C/Ses who don't know their business and
who don't keep up their study and are too lazy to FES or read sessions or
cram their Auditors.
There are an awful lot of excellent Auditors and many very fine C/Ses. But
in some local areas, where verbal tech gets going and ethics is out, the
quality sags. And there you have ncgs and slow pcs and "failed cases".
Want to know how lazy your C/Ses and Auditors are? How many ncgs and
failed cases do you have around? If you have any at all, tech in your area
is out.
A C/S 53RJ taken to F/Ning list and a GF40X taken to an F/Ning list
will cure any ncg or failed case. BUT it has to be done by an Auditor who
has sweated it out doing the checksheets of Qual required to make a list
read.
So do not send to find the real who when cases bog or "fail". Don't
blame and repair cases. Repair the Auditors and C/Ses.
It not only can be done. It is easier to do it than wrestle around with
an "ARC Broken field".
And it not only can be done, it MUST be done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd
Copyright � 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JULY 1976
Remimeo
ALL AUDITORS
PTS RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RD
POSITION CORRECTED
It has just come to my attention that HCOB 9 December 1971RA and HCOB 6
October 1974, which were written by then CS-4, restricted. PTS handling and
Vital Info RD to Expanded Dianetics which is a false position.
The PTS Checksheet is Board Policy Letter 31 May 1971RB. That
checksheet MUST be studied and passed by ALL staff concerned with PTS
handling whether in HCO or in Div 4 or Div 5. In short, THAT is the actual
position on the grade chart or in classes of the PTS Rundown.
When listing has to be done to handle a PTS person or to find a why or
who, on PTS RDs or anything else, it is dangerous for anyone but a Class IV
who has been interned to do it. THAT is a matter of who can do listing. It
is NOT a matter of where the pc is on the grade chart.
YOU HAVE TO HANDLE THOSE WHO ARE PTS AS PTSes BEFORE YOU CAN AUDIT THEM
SUCCESSFULLY.
ANYONE HANDLING PTS PEOPLE MUST HAVE PASSED AND BEEN CERTIFIED ON THE
PTS CHECKSHEET, BPL 31 May 1971RB.
The errors put in these two HCOBs have caused orgs and the field to
fill up with PTSes which went unhandled. You cannot audit a PTS person on
anything but what handles PTSness.
The HCOBs are being reissued as HCOB 9 December 1971RB and HCOB 6
October 1974R to correct the error of placing PTS RD in Expanded Dianetics
where it does not belong and placing the Vital Info RD in Expanded
Dianetics.
A mission that worked more than a year correcting HCOBs that were
marked as written by me but weren't and reissuing as Board Technical
Bulletins missed these. They otherwise did well. The person who wrote the
originals found them and called it to attention as an error.
PLEASE CORRECT THIS IN ALL PACKS.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo
Class IV HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971RB
Ex Dn Spclst REVISED 29 JULY 1976
Requires: Revision in this type style to cancel
WC 2 any restriction of PTS RD to Ex Dn
*Rate and to add Flow 0 Commands
Clay for Quad pcs.
TRs 4000-9
4000-10
PTS RUNDOWN
References:
BPL 31 May 71RA PTS/SP Checksheet
HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition
HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List
HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD
HCOB 3 Jun 72R PTS RD, Final Step
HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling
HCOB 9 Nov 67 Review Auditors
HCOB 14 Jan 68 S&D Type "S"
HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button
HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scn
CASES
One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena."
P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he
becomes a Potential Trouble Source.
There are numerous HCOBs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true
observations and predictions.
The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a
gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS.
S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are
still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without
change.
Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too
frequent case condition can be handled.
WHO DOES IT
Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okay to
Audits.
For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent
interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it
needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very
honest auditing and competent C/Sing.
DEVELOPMENT
Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively
covered.
The recent wrap up came about through my OT research in November 1971.
The principle breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate having
known certain people before.
This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people
thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous
characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But
people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running
them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks
through for a stalled Dianetic Case.
In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you
were
" for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain
individuals before this life.
But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and
lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person
before this life.
Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that
life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds.
BREAKDOWN
There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown.
1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs
out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally
familiar with this Rundown.
2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is
a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF
and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the
R3R.
3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left
incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster).
4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a
full Drug Rundown.
There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS
Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the
PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it
really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing
it are especially rough.
Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard
practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with
engram running.
The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted
the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature.
Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int
repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be
gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted.
The prerequisites for a PTS RD are covered in 2 and 4 above. /t is not
restricted to Ex Dn but is a separate RD developed before Ex Dn.
BEHAVIOR OF RD
Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be
noted on the worksheet.
The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be
sure with an L3RD. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have
to work at it. In the
PTS RD incidents can "develop." Missing pieces can appear. A whole new
slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2 after finishing Fl.
Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown.
And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied
by this Rundown.
END PHENOMENA
There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person
before this life. This is NOT the EP.
A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an
Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its
correction).
THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN
ROLLERCOASTERS.
FLOWS
You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this
fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc.
Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place).
Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others.
If you did Fl R3R as "Locate a time you knew " you might get to
the pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean
motivator Fl. This would leave the PTS chain partially run.
This is also true of the ruds.
RE-DOs
If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above
should be checked
Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4BR and L3RD.
Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and
handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have
missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such
obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in)
the other person.
Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before.
SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
Here are the issues that directly cover the Rundown:
HCOB 9 Dec 71RA PTS Rundown
HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition
HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List
HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RD, Final Step
HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button
HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scientology
HCOB 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78
Issue II
HCOB 15 Dec 68R L4BR
HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling
THE RUNDOWN
A. PAST S&Ds:
1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been
verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder.
2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads handle
per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check for
validity.
3. R3R Triple/quad the item using these commands:
F1. Locate a time when_____did something to you. R3R.
F2. Locate a time when you did something to _____R3R.
F3. Locate a time when _____ did something to others. R3R.
F0. Locate a time when you did something to yourself because
of _____. R3R.
4. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item using these commands:
(a) Did_____ARC Break you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(b) Did you ARC Break_____? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(c) Did_____ARC Break others? ARCU CDEINR.
(d) Did YOU ARC Break with yourself because of _____? ARCU
CDEINR.
ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S.
(e) Did_____give you a problem? E/S to F/N.
(f) Did you give_____a problem? E/S to F/N.
(g) Did_____give others problems? E/S to F/N.
(h) Did you give yourself problems because of _____? E/S to
F/N.
-----------
(i) Did you withhold anything from _____? E/S to F/N.
( j) Did_____withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N.
(k) Did_____withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N.
(I) Did you withhold anything from yourself because of _____?
E/S to F/N.
-----------
(m) Did_____commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N.
(n) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on_____? E/S to F/N.
(o) Did_____commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N.
(p) Did you commit an overt on yourself because of _____? E/S
to F/N.
5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforced Hav" with these steps:
(a) Clear "Can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO
SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT
THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or
two.
(b) Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator
repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to
others, others to terminal, (four flows of two commands each, or
five if pc Quad).
(c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective
Havingness should be run.
THE COMMANDS:
F1. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you?
2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want?
F2. 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)?
2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it)
didn't want?
F3. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others?
2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want?
F3A 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)?
2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it)
didn't want?
F0. 1. What Can't Have did you run on yourself because of_____?
2. What did you try to force on yourself because of_____that you
didn't want?
--OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS--
6. Handle all past S&D items per above steps.
B. PAST PTS INTERVIEWS:
7. Collect up all past PTS Interview items (which should have
already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups).
8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so reads handle as
below.
9. R3R Triple/Quad the item.
10. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item.
11. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav.
12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS Interview items.
C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds):
13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in
Scientology, assessment and L&Ns.
14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads.
15. R3R Triple/Quad the item.
16. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item.
17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav.
18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other items if valid.
D. TROUBLED/WORRIED:
19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or
worried you? to B/D F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother,
wife or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles,
grandparents, lovers.)
20. Check item for known before, if it so reads:
21. R3R Triple/Quad.
22. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts.
23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav.
E. BEEN AFTER:
24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item.
25. Check known before and if it reads:
26. R3R Triple/Quad.
27. Triple/Quad Ruds & Overts.
28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav.
F. PLANETS:
29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N
item.
30. R3R Triple/Quad.
31. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts.
32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav.
-------------
33. D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be
sure the person is now all right (not PTS).
-------------
REPAIR
Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BR, L3RD, GF Method 5
and handle, C/S 53 if necessary.
A really big snarl up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with HCOB 16
Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List.
If pc gets ill or rollercoasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD
Correction List HCOB 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared
up.
SUMMARY
The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each
aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled
thoroughly before it is delivered.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1971, 1974, 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 OCTOBER 1974 R
REVISED 29 JULY 1976
To cancel restriction of this RD to Ex Dn.
Remimeo
Ex Dn
Specialists
IMPORTANT
THE VITAL INFORMATION RUNDOWN
THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF 1974
Recent intensive investigation into blocks on tech, dissemination and
communication lines uncovered an aberration which is quite widespread and
especially common in society.
Simply stated I found that WHERE VITAL INFORMATION WAS NOT BEING
RELAYED OR WAS HIDDEN OR FALSIFIED, THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE WERE DRAMATIZING
WITHHOLDS.
You can see this is newspapers, government policies, the medical
profession, psychiatry, economics and especially education.
I have for years tried to get to the bottom of why people will not
teach people. It is the single greatest fault in existing culture in my
opinion.
The answer that fits all cases is a failure to relay information,
brief, instruct, train or supervise stemming from a general past and
current OVERT OF WITHHOLDING VITAL INFORMATION. This gives a dramatization
in daily conduct of failing to relay information, brief, instruct, train or
supervise.
And underlying that is the intentional impulse to do so overtly or
covertly in a mistaken attempt to forward their own first dynamic.
RESEARCH
The primary outpoint that led to this conclusion is the premium given
to silence in philosophy and the approval accorded the silent by the
population whereas such people are in fact quite deadly and useless.
It is a generalized dramatization in this society. This would be what
made the society favor the "strong silent type" as a sort of ideal.
All this in a highly technical society is hazardous. A good example is
the current fuel crisis over a supposed scarcity of petroleum fuels for
highly inefficient internal combustion engines while answers in the form of
new fuels and engines are hidden away in vaults by the vested interests.
ORGS
In our organizations this is deadly. It blocks our tech lines in the
Academy and Qual as well as the HGC. It cuts our dissem lines to public via
books, promo, regging, lectures, use of C/F and Addresso and FSMs. It cuts
our comm lines and denies data to higher management.
It winds up in no application of the tech and no results for the public.
That makes this rundown mandatory for top execs including Flag Reps and
LRH Comms, all Tech and Qual staff and Dissem, Distrib and HCO Dept 2.
PECULIARITY
This mechanism is a peculiar one with its own special twist.
Earlier rundowns did not hit this particular type of overt. It isn't
very visible and doesn't occur in rundowns like L-10.
It is not simple withholding information. It is (or once was) the
intentional overt of withholding VITAL information. It would be a very long
chain and would influence general conduct. A bordering chain is withholding
information under torture.
Probably an A = A = A sets in which then totally prohibits some (too
many) people from imparting important data, thus they can't teach, amongst
other things. It has to be fully run out, engrams and all.
THE RUNDOWN
Where staff are concerned, the necessity of delivering this RD reduces
the prerequisites for it to the Drug RD only. It could be done if necessary
where the Drug RD was not yet complete but would have to be verified after
completion of the Drug RD. The prerequisite for public is Drug RD.
VITAL INFO RD
1. Clear and assess:
VITAL DATA
THE TRUTH
VITAL INFORMATION
KNOWLEDGE
Choose the best read as the item.
2. (a) L&N "What would happen if you communicated_______?"
(b) R3R Quad.
3. (a) L&N "What problem have you had with_______?"
(b) R3R Quad.
4. (a) Clear and assess:
Withholding (item) under duress.
Withholding (item) under torture.
Withholding (item) to protect someone.
(b) R3R Quad.
5. (a) Clear all words plus fully clear each outpoint with examples
and demos so it's understood.
(b) Assess:
Omitted (item) .
Altered the sequence of (item)
Dropped time out of (item)
Added falsehoods to (item)
Altered the importance of (item)
Used (item) to wrong tgt.
Assigned the wrong source for (item)
Made (item) a contrary fact.
Added time to the relay of (item)
Added inapplicable data to (item)
Incorrectly included other data with (item)
Complicated (item) .
Suppressed (item) .
In order of reads:
(c) R3R Quad
Locate a time when another______ to/for/from (pick which) you.
Locate a time when you_____to/for/from another.
Locate a time when another_____to/for/from another.
(d) L&N "What would be the intention of someone who_____?"
(e) R3R Quad the intention.
6. (a) Assess:
Concerning (item) has there been a break in Affinity
Reality
Communication
Understanding
(b) R3R Quad the largest read.
(c) Reassess ARCU and handle to F/Ning assessment.
7. (a) Clear all words, especially assumption and justify and
withholding (in the broad sense).
(b) L&N "What assumption would justify withholding (item) ?"
(c) R3R Quad the computation.
8. R3R Quad all E. Purps that came up during the RD.
9. R3R Quad all computations that came up during the RD.
SUMMARY
The importance of this RD for Tech and Qual staff and sensitive posts
cannot be over-emphasized.
Although it will be quite popular with the public it is basically
designed for staff on these lines.
The auditors delivering it should themselves have had it. They must
have flawless TRs, be able to make a meter read and must drill the RD in
Qual before attempting to deliver it.
This RD is very powerful. Don't miss on it with careless delivery. Get it
done flawlessly as directed and you will have a resurge on delivery and
dissemination lines and open the door to A GOLDEN ERA OF AUDITING QUALITY
AND RESULTS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by CS-4.
LRH:RS:nt
Copyright � 1974, 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1976
Remimeo
All Sec Checkers
All HCO Personnel
All Meter Operators
R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN
(INTEGRITY PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS)
(PTS PROCESSING CHECKSHEETS)
(EXPANDED DIANETICS CHECKSHEETS)
(METER OPERATION CHECKSHEETS)
(VARIOUS RUNDOWN CHECKSHEETS)
The violent left right ragged motion of the needle which sometimes
occurs on a pc's meter is called "A Rockslam" or "R/S." The term was taken
from a process in the 50s which sought to locate "A rock" on the pc's early
timetrack; the "slam" is a description of the needle violence, meaning it
"slams" back and forth. For a time all left right motions of the needle
were considered and called "Rockslams" until it was found that a smooth
left right flow was a symptom of release or key out and this became the
"Floating Needle." There is yet another left right motion of the needle
called the "Theta Bop." This occurs when the person has or is trying to
exteriorize. "Theta" is the symbol for the person as a spirit or goodness;
"bop" is an electronic term for a slight hitch in the sweep of a needle. A
"Theta Bop" hitches evenly at each end of the sweep left and right and is
very even in the middle of the sweep.
Neither the "Floating Needle" nor the "Theta Bop" can be confused with
a "Rockslam." The difference of the Rockslam is uneven, ragged agitation
left and right; even the distances traveled left and right are likely to be
different in each swing from the last.
A "Rockslam" can be caused sometimes by leaving rings on the pc's
fingers or by a short circuit in the meter or by the cans (electrodes)
touching something like a dress. These are the mechanical considerations
and must be ruled out before the pc can be considered to have
"Rockslammed." If the pc is not wearing rings and if the meter needle is
calm with the lead unplugged, if the lead is okay, and if the pc is not
jiggling the ends of the cans against his clothes, then the pc's Rockslam
is caused by the pc's bank.
One has to be very careful about the correctness of the pc actually
having Rockslammed while on the meter that it was actually observed, that
it was not mechanically caused as above. One puts the R/S down on the
worksheet and also gives exactly what was asked. And also that the
mechanical points were checked without distracting the pc.
ONE MUST ALWAYS REPORT A ROCKSLAM IN THE AUDITING REPORT, NOTE IT WITH
SESSION DATE AND PAGE INSIDE THE LEFT COVER OF THE PC'S FOLDER AND REPORT
IT TO ETHICS INCLUDING THE QUESTION OR SUBJECT WHICH ROCKSLAMMED, PHRASED
EXACTLY.
Why? Because the Rockslam is the most important needle manifestation!
It gives the clue to the pc's case.
In 1970 I began a full-scale research project into the subject of
insanity and its relationship to cases and case gains and suppression. It
was only then that the full significance of the Rockslam was unearthed.
This research developed into what is now
called EXPANDED DIANETICS, a series of special processes and actions with
their drills and training which permits the auditor to handle a specific
case type. This was, by the way, Man's first system of positive detection
and handling of psychosis and the first full understanding of what
psychosis is.
While this bulletin is not in any way a two minute course in or a
substitute for full training in Expanded Dianetics, any auditor who audits,
sec checks, or handles people on a meter has to know what a Rockslam is and
how it behaves and what he should do about it.
The first thing is to be able to recognize one and to quickly with the
scan of the eye and unplug of the meter cord (without any distraction of or
notice by the pc) make the checks for a mechanical Rockslam as given above.
You can make a meter "Rockslam" with no pc or cord connected to it by
(a) turning it on; (b) put the sensitivity at perhaps 2; (c) put the needle
at "set"; (d) rapidly, very rapidly, move the TA back and forth maybe a
quarter of an inch and do it unevenly. That, if you did it very fast and
unevenly, would be something that resembled a Rockslam. But no matter how
fast you made your fingers move, a real R/S is a trifle faster. If you do
that you will see what an R/S looks like. The needle in this experiment is
not made to hit the sides of the meter.
Now if you take the same setup and smoothly slowly move the tone arm
back and forth about 2 times a second without any roughness and the same
distance right and left, you will have a Floating Needle. Note it very well
as this comes at a time of release and is the thing a good auditor hopes to
see and gives him the end-off signal for a process. It has to be well known
as you NEVER bypass one in a session and to do so makes an uncomfortable
pc. (The pc will often cognite-and get a realization about himself or life
at this point and one does not stop him from doing this.) This is the thing
you indicate to the pc. You don't ever indicate Rockslams or Theta Bops.
When you see it and, without stopping or interrupting the pc's cognition,
you always say, "Your needle is floating."
Now the Theta Bop can also be shown to yourself by you. Set up the
meter as above. Only this time, you smoothly swing it to the right and give
it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then you smoothly, at once, swing
it to the left and give it a tiny twitch in the same direction. Then do it
to the right. And so on. This is a Theta Bop. It is different than a
Floating Needle only in that it hitches at each end of the swing. So learn
to recognize it.
There is a vicious smooth right direction slash that occurs when a pc
hits a certain area of the bank that is called a "Rocket Read" and there is
of course the small fall, long fall (which both go to the right and
indicate a charged question or reaction) and there is the gradual rise to
the left. But these do not repeat back and forth which is the
characteristic of the Rockslam, Floating Needle and Theta Bop.
All right, so we know exactly what it looks like when we talk about a
ROCKSLAM as a read of the meter. We know how it can be mechanically caused.
And we know what we have to record and report when it is seen.
But exactly what does a Rockslam mean with regards to the pc?
If you don't know this you can miss on the pc, on the case, on the org
and humanity.
A ROCKSLAM MEANS A HIDDEN EVIL INTENTION ON THE SUBJECT OR QUESTION
UNDER DISCUSSION OR AUDITING.
Two things underlie insanity, or to be more specific, there are two
causes and conditions both of which have been lumped together by man and
called insanity. He could not of course define it as he didn't know what
caused it.
The first of these two things does not concern us overly much here and is
the subject of a separate checksheet training and is called PTS or
Potential Trouble Source handling. A "PTS" is a person who has been or is
connected with somebody who has evil intentions. A PTS can feel
uncomfortable in life or be neurotic or go insane because of the actions
upon him of a person with evil intentions. Most of the people in
institutions are probable PTSes.
The second of these two things is insanity caused to the individual
himself (let alone others) by hidden evil intentions.
The extent of these intentions and what the person will do (and hide)
in order to carry them out is quite shocking. These people are covert or
overt criminals and many of them are insane-meaning beyond all rationality
in their acts. Because their evil intentions are hidden and because they
are often very plausible such individuals are what make "behavior so
mysterious" and "man looks so evil when you see what mankind does" and all
sorts of fallacies.
It is this last type, the chronic, heavy Rockslammer, which Expanded
Dianetics handles.
One Rockslam doesn't make a psychotic. Or a total menace to everyone.
But it does mean there could be more and it might in rare cases mean you
have, seeing enough of these R/Ses, a very dangerous person on your hands
and in your vicinity. And that person must be handled by Expanded
Dianetics.
You won't see a great many Rockslams in auditing people so you could be
totally thrown off by surprise when you see one. And mess it all up because
you are surprised. So know what it is and don't get all quivery and make
mistakes and blow your confront. Just carry on.
If you don't note the EXACT question that was asked and the EXACTLY
worded statement the pc made when the R/S was seen, you can muck it up for
the Expanded Dianetics guys. They won't be able to get it turned back on
again easily and will lose a lot of time. So you have to be sure your
auditing report is accurate, that the R/S is written BIG on the column and
circled and, no matter what else you do in the session, you have to get it
recorded in the left front cover of the folder giving the date and page of
the session and you have to report it to Ethics. And also you don't third
party the pc and give him a bad time in the session because of it.
Now R/Ses most easily turn on during Sec Checks or Integrity Processing
or when pulling withholds or trying to investigate something. So the people
who see these most often are those engaged in that activity and not routine
auditing (when they can also but more rarely turn on). Further the most
likely person to collide with "needing to be sec checked" is an R/Ser,
which again increases the numbers of R/Ses seen in these activities
compared to routine auditing. But a very heavy R/Ser will also turn them on
in routine auditing.
It is the exact point of the R/S in the session, the exact question
that was asked and the exact subject or phrase where the R/S turned on that
are important. And these are very important as then the person can be fully
handled with a full Expanded Dianetics rundown by a qualified Expanded
Dianetics Specialist. When, of course, the person gets to that point on his
grade chart. (The grade chart points are after Dianetics (like Drug RDs
etc) but before Grades, after Grades but before Power, after Power but
before Solo, and after OT III or after any single grade above OT III. These
are the only points where Expanded Dianetics can be delivered and the R/S
fully and completely handled.)
Now here is how you can turn off an R/S and mistakenly think it is
handled:
1. The overt-motivator sequence has two sides. One is what the person
has done (overt) and what is done to the person (motivator). You can
ask, when the person R/Ses on something, if anyone has ever INVALIDATED
him on that subject or
action. He will find some and the R/S will turn off AND WON'T EVEN
BE FAINTLY HANDLED BUT ONLY SUBMERGED. One can believe he had "handled"
the R/S. Not true. He has just turned it off and maybe made it harder
to find next time. One can ask what the person has done TO the subject
mentioned and while this may unburden the case and make the person a
bit better, the R/S is NOT handled, only turned off or submerged. It's
almost as if there are so many overts and motivators on this subject or
in this area that the push-pull of it makes the needle go wild (R/S).
And indeed, this may be the energy cause, in the bank, of the needle
reaction.
But neither overt nor motivator handles an R/S finally because the
CAUSE of the R/S is an INTENTION to harm and it isn't all that likely
the basic intention will be reached.
2. Another apparent way the R/S can get "handled" and isn't is to take
the R/Ser earlier-similar on the subject of the R/S. The R/S will
probably cease, go "clean." But in actual fact it is still there,
hidden.
3. The third way an R/S can be falsely "handled" is to direct the
person's attention to something else. If, when this is done, the exact
subject of the R/S is not noted by the auditor, it will be difficult to
find it again when the person goes into Expanded Dianetic auditing.
4. Yet another, and probably the last way to falsely "handle" an R/S is
to abuse the person about his conduct or behavior or the R/S, or to
"educate" him to do better, or to "modify" his behavior with shocks or
surgery or other tortures like the psychiatrists do. In other words one
can seek to suppress the R/S in numerous ways. Maybe the R/S won't
occur (being too overburdened now) but it is still there, buried very
deep and possibly beyond reach now.
So if you understand the above four points you will see that although
you can ease off the R/S, you have not handled it. It has merely gone out
of sight.
All right, what then DOES HANDLE an R/S?
I warned you that this isn't a two minute course on Expanded Dianetics
and it isn't. An R/S is HANDLED by a fully qualified Expanded Dianetics
auditor delivering full Expanded Dianetics to the person at that point on
the grade chart where Expanded Dianetics is supposed to be delivered. If
anyone thinks it can be done effectively any other way or if he C/Ses it to
be done and the auditor is stupid enough to try to do that C/S, then it's
Committees of Evidence and Suspended Certificates all around.
With that warning, and only with that warning, I can briefly state what
has to be done with the case. This is not what YOU do if you are not
delivering full Expanded Dianetics at the right point on the grade chart.
It is a brief statement so that you can understand what lies under that
R/S.
The pc with an R/S on any given subject and who R/Ses while discussing
that or related subjects HAS AN EVIL INTENTION TOWARD THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED
OR SOME CLOSELY RELATED SUBJECT. The pc intends that subject or area of
life nothing but calculating, covert, underhanded HARM which will be at all
times carefully hidden from that subject.
Thus, the Expanded Dianetics Specialist, in handling that case (at the
proper point on the grade chart) has to be able to locate each and every
subject and question and R/S in that person's folder as noted by Sec
Checkers and previous auditors or cramming officers or why finders. He has
to have the complete list of R/S subjects. If they are noted as to session
date and page and if all sec checking papers and cramming papers are in
that person's folder, then the Expanded Dianetics Specialist can do a full
and complete job. Otherwise he has to do a lot of other time wasting
actions to get the R/Ses found and turned on again.
What the Expanded Dianetics Specialist actually does is locate EXACTLY the
actual evil intention for every R/S on the case and handle each one to
total conclusion. When he is finished, if he has done his job well, the
person's behavior will be magically improved and as to his social presence,
menace and conduct, well that will be toward survival.
When you see an R/S, if you are not an Expanded Dianetic Specialist
doing Expanded Dianetics at the correct point on the grade chart, you don't
say, "Hey, you've got an evil intention!" and you don't ask "Say, what's
that evil intention?" or do corny things like that because you'll get the
pc self listing, you may get a wrong item, you won't know what to do with
it and you're just likely to get the auditing room wrapped around your neck
right there.
No, you quietly note it, make sure it isn't a mechanical fault, write
it big on the worksheet, write down everything the pc is saying swiftly,
note what question you were asking and let the pc talk and ack him and go
on with what you are doing with the pc at the time. And after session you
note it in the left-hand cover of the folder and send a report to Ethics.
And some day, when he's done his Drug Rundown or gotten to one of the
points on the grade chart where a full XDn can be done, why then it will be
handled. And a good C/S will program or tip the case for that to be done.
So that's the know-how you have to know about R/Ses to really help the
guy and the society and your group.
We're not in the business of curing psychos. The governments at this
writing pay the psychiatrists billions a year to torture and kill because
of R/Ses they don't know anything about. The crime in the society out there
is caused by people who R/S. Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon and Caesar were
probably the most loaded R/Sers of all time unless it was Jack the Ripper
or your local friendly psychiatrist.
So know what you are seeing when you see it and know what to do about
it. And don't kid yourself. Or vilify or mow down people who R/S; we're not
in that business.
And the Expanded Dianetic Specialist and the pc someday will love you
dearly for knowing your job and doing it right.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
(LRH ED 257 INT of 1 December 1974
Revised and Reissued as an HCOB)
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 96
DELIVERY REPAIR LISTS
THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR CF, YOUR PC, YOUR STUDENT, STAFF MEMBER
OR YOUR OWN DELIVERY THAT A PREPARED LIST WON'T HANDLE.
"ARC Broken CFs," blown students, demanded refunds, low success
stories, withdrawn auditors, ineffective staffs are pretty silly problems
to have these days.
Many years ago I developed a system called "Prepared Lists."
These isolated the trouble the pc was having in auditing without taxing
anyone's imagination and sending the auditor into a figure-figure on the
pc.
These prepared lists were assessed on an E-Meter. One took up the
biggest read first and then cleaned up all other reads.
Time has gone on. The system of prepared lists has been expanded to
include not only pcs but students and staff.
It may have gone overlooked that such lists now include anything that
could happen to a pc or student. In other words, prepared lists have become
very thorough.
WHO CAN USE
The only reason ever found for prepared lists not working was an
auditor's weak TR 1 and inability to read a meter.
Even this difficulty has been handled by "Qual Okay to Audit"
Checksheets.
Before an auditor should be let near a prepared list he should be put
through at least six "Okay to Audit" short Checksheets in Qual.
Qual is not fast flow. Things done in Qual are Method 4 Word Cleared
and starrated, with all demos and drills. Only if this is done can you have
some certainty that a prepared list will read on the pc and that the pc or
student will get handled.
These Qual "Okay to Audit" Checksheets are done AFTER a student has
been trained and classed as an auditor. The "Okay to Audit" is for auditing
in an org whether staff or interne.
The checksheets are:
(1) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74R Issue I
QUAL OKAY TO OPERATE AN E-METER
(2) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue II
QUAL OK NO. 2R, QUAL OK TO ASSESS PREPARED LISTS
(3) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue III
QUAL OK NO. 3, QUAL OK TO AUDIT LISTING AND NULLING
(4) Board Policy Letter 14 Nov 74 Issue IV
QUAL OK NO. 4, QUAL OK TO CORRECT LISTING AND NULLING
(5) Board Policy Letter 8 Nov 71RB
QUAL OK NO. 5R, INTERNSHIPS ELECTRONIC ATTESTATION
FORM
(6) Board Policy Letter 20 July 70R Issue III Revised 25 Nov 74
TWO WAY COMM CHECKSHEET
Only when these have been thoroughly and honestly studied, drilled and
done should an auditor be permitted to assess prepared lists on pcs and
students.
It takes standard auditor training to handle the points found reading
on a list.
CASE SUPERVISING
A C/S who is trained as a C/S must know what lists to use. And he must
see to it that his auditors are trained via the above checklists. Otherwise
the lists just won't read and the C/S, the pc and the org are left up the
creek!
LOTS of "lists that didn't read" are found in folders. I used to make a
practice of just having them nulled again by an auditor whose metering and
TRs were good and THEY READ AND THE CASE RESOLVED.
PC LISTS
1. HCO BULLETIN 24 NOVEMBER 1973RB, C/S SERIES 53RJ" SHORT HI-LO TA
ASSESSMENT C/S." This is a famous list. It solved the long long problem of
high and low TAs and really solved it. Unfortunately it has a name of being
done for high and low TAs. In truth it practically handles the whole repair
of any difficult case today! One assesses it Method 5. One handles the
reads from the top down. It can also be reassessed several times until it
F/Ns on a whole M5 assessment. It is quite remarkable what it will do for a
case that has been running badly or is bogged, quite in addition to
handling high and low TAs!
2. HCO BULLETIN 1 JANUARY 1972RA, "LIX HI-LO TA REVISED." This is the
same list as C/S 53RJ above. It has been brought up to date. It gives the
whole question for each subject as in C/S 53RJ and the same handling. It is
easier to use on a pc whose attention wanders or who is not very familiar
with terms.
3. HCO BULLETIN 29 OCTOBER 1971R, "INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST REVISED."
As Interiorization-Exteriorization problems (when they exist) have to be
handled before any other thing is handled, an auditor sometimes assesses
another list and then finds himself doing this list, "Int" appears on many
other lists and when it reads one does this list. One has to go back and
complete the original list of course. "Int" problems cause high TA,
headaches and general upset. I've begun to think after seeing a lot of
headache cases that maybe only Int-Ext problems cause headaches! Instead of
repairing Int, sometimes auditors will run it again and again. Also Int can
go flat to Cog VVGIs on an early flow, even a recall flow. Then if one
insists on finishing the Int RD, one has trouble and I mean trouble. So
this is a valuable list.
4. HCO BULLETIN 15 DECEMBER 1968R, "L4BR" "FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING
ERRORS." An out list (meaning one done by Listing and Nulling, not a
prepared list) can raise more concentrated hell with a pc than any other
single auditing error. The amount of misemotion or illness which a wrong
list generates has to be seen to be believed. When a pc is ill after a
session or up to 3 days after, always suspect that a listing action done on
the pc had an error in it. It MUST be corrected. The prepared list L4BR
corrects lists of the Listing and Nulling variety. It can be run on old
lists, current lists, general listing. There has been no reason to revise
this since 2 June 1972. It really works!
5. HCO BULLETIN l9 MARCH 1971, "LIST 1-C." This is the updated version
of the earliest list ever compiled. It is used during sessions at the
auditor's discretion and in other ways. It also prevents some pc from
insisting "it's an ARC Brk" (which never clears) when it's really a
withhold, a common error. It can also be addressed to life. Usually when a
session blows up, an L1C is used fast rather than just sit and ack!
6. HCO BULLETIN 11 APRIL 1971RA, L3RD "DIANETICS AND INT RD REPAIR
LIST." This is the key list of Dianetic Auditing and is the Dianetic
standby in case of trouble. As the Int RD is also Dianetics, while doing
it, one uses L3RD for trouble.
7. HCO BULLETIN 2 APRIL 1972RB ISSUE II, EXPANDED DIANETICS SERIES 3 RB,
"L3 EXD RB." This is the prepared list for Expanded Dianetics.
8. HCO BULLETIN 29 FEBRUARY 1972R, "FALSE TA CHECKLIST." This was a very
important discovery about TAs. One uses this when another list indicates a
False TA or one is suspected. Auditors have been known to get so desperate
about a pc's TA that they falsified worksheets. This (and C/S 53RJ) make
that totally needless. I've seen this change a case from despair to
VVVVGIs!
9. HCO BULLETIN 16 APRIL 1972, "PTS RD CORRECTION LIST." It also gives
the expected actions of a PTS Rundown. Doing PTS Rundowns without this
prepared list handy can be risky.
10. HCO POLICY LETTER 7 APRIL 1970RA, "GREEN FORM." This was the earliest
Qual Saint Hill weapon (26 June 65) for case cracking. It is modernized up
to 29 Sept 74 in the above issue. Used for general case clean-up
particularly on an out rud type pc or when ruds won't fly. It is not used
to handle high or low TA.
11. HCO BULLETIN 30 JUNE 1971R, "EXPANDED GF 40RB." Called "GF 40X" This
is the "7 resistive type cases" at the end of the Green Form expanded out.
This is how you get those "earlier practices" and other case stoppers. This
done well gives a lot of extensive work in Dianetics. It's lengthy but
really pays off.
If you were to do a C/S 53RJ Method 5, all handled, and to an F/Ning list
and then do a GF 40XRB, all handled, reassessed to an F/Ning list you would
''crack'' most cases to a point where they ran well.
12. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 28 MAY 1974R, "FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR
INJURY AND ILLNESS." While you don't put the pc on the cans for this one,
you mark it as to the state the pc is in and it says what you do for
illness and injury. This one, done correctly, is how the minister runs the
medico out of business.
STUDENT LISTS
13. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1973R, "FEAR OF PEOPLE LIST-R." This is for
the handling of timid tech staff who back off from handling rough pcs.
14. HCO BULLETIN 15 NOVEMBER 1974, "STUDENT REHABILITATION LIST." This is
the one that gets a bogged student sailing, gets a blown student back, gets
an auditor back auditing. It even cures the revolutionary student! This is
the master list for students-even students in grammar schools and colleges!
A real winner.
15. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE I, "STUDENT
CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST- I ." A list for correcting students on
course.
STAFF LISTS
16. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972R ISSUE II, "COURSE SUPERVISOR CORRECTION
LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 2R." This is to get the Course Supervisor going well.
17. HCO BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE III, "AUDITOR CORRECTION LIST,
STUDY CORR LIST 3." This one corrects Auditors who are having a rough time.
18. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RA ISSUE IV, "CASE SUPERVISOR
CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 4." This one corrects Case Supervisors,
gets them back on the rails.
19. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1972RC ISSUE V, "EXECUTIVE
CORRECTION LIST, STUDY CORR LIST 5." This prepared list locates an
executive's troubles and indicates handling.
20. BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 4 FEBRUARY 1972RD, "STUDY SERIES 7." A real
long workout for a person who won't study or who is having real trouble on
a course. Goes after it in depth. Can be used as a second list to Student
Rehab list above or by itself.
21. HCO BULLETIN 21 JULY 1971RD, WORD CLEARING SERIES 35RD, "WORD
CLEARING CORRECTION LIST REVISED." Usually written "WCCL." This is the
famous list that goes with Method 1 Word Clearing or with any Word Clearing
bog. Also corrects high and low TA WHEN it occurs in a Word Clearing
session. This is the Word Clearer's friendly friend.
22. HCO POLICY LETTER 9 APRIL 1972, "ETHICS, CORRECT DANGER CONDITION
HANDLING." Locates the trouble area that got him into a Danger Condition.
Goes with the famous "3 May P/L" HCO PL 3 May 1972.
23. HCO POLICY LETTER 13 MARCH 1972, "ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES NO.
5." An invaluable text and list for PRODUCT CLEARING. It's a list of what
you do to clear products. From it a prepared list can be made.
24. HCO POLICY LETTER 23 MARCH 1972, ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER SERIES 11,
"FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM."
25. HCO POLICY LETTER 12 JUNE 1972, DATA SERIES 26, ESTO SERIES 18. A
list you assess to locate trouble an evaluator might be having. Also for
slow evaluators or slow students on a Data Series Course.
26. HCO BULLETIN 28 AUGUST 1970RA, "HC OUT-POINT-PLUS-POINT LISTS RA."
This is a prepared list that locates the outpoints in a person's own
thinking. When people can't seem to evaluate (or think brightly) this list
will do wonders. Some Data Series Course students make no progress at all
until they are assessed on this list and handled.
27. HCO BULLETIN 2 DECEMBER 1974, "DYNAMIC SORT OUT ASSESSMENT." (Revised
from BTB 4 Dec 71 Issue II, Replacing HCOB 4 Dec 71 Issue II R-1C
Assessment by Dynamics.) This gets those dynamics that are charged and
handles them. Increases social personality and even can shift valences.
WORD LISTS
FOR PREPARED LISTS
Nearly every prepared list has all its words on a separate sheet, ready
for word clearing on the pc. All the words on a list are cleared on a pc
without repeating the same word or asking the list question. Such lists are
issued for auditor convenience.
A list of these word lists is being issued as HCOB I Dec 74 so that you
can match them to the prepared lists in this Bulletin.
OTHER LISTS
There is a whole package of processing, mainly by prepared lists, in
Integrity Processing, issued as its own series and now being reissued.
There are great Solo Lists for Solo Repair used on Advance Courses.
And from time to time when a need for prepared list is found new ones
will be issued on different subjects.
One can REPAIR a pc or student or staff member. One can also FORWARD a
case into new areas with other prepared lists.
MIMEO
Some orgs backlog their mimeos.
The AVAILABILITY of lists to auditors is something which should NOT be
neglected. It is highly uneconomical as one loses re-signs and students and
staff when prepared lists are in non-existence in an org or even short
supply.
Tech is the atomic fuel an org runs on.
KEEP PREPARED LISTS IN SUPPLY FOR USE.
TRANSLATED ISSUES
In non-English speaking orgs lists must be very carefully translated
and mimeoed for use. In such orgs, more than any others, great care must be
taken to have and use lists as they keep tech straight where it tends to go
hearsay and verbal.
-----------
So, that's quite an array of prepared lists, isn't it?
If they are not in full use in your org don't wonder about your
Delivery Stats Why. Or your org and CF problems. It's a lack of full use of
this tech.
Hidden in these prepared lists is a wealth of tech that explodes into
wins for your org, your CF, your pcs and students.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
All revisions by
Materials Chief FB
As approved by
L. Ron Hubbard
LRH:RS.nt
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo Issue I
All HCOs
All Tech Divs (Also issued as HCO PL 26 Oct 76
All Courses Issue I, same title.)
C/S Series 97
AUDITING REPORTS, FALSIFYING OF
Probably the most covert and vicious crime in auditing is falsifying an
auditing report.
At first glance, to someone who is trying to PR himself as an auditor
or to escape consequences of session goofs, this might not seem to be the
huge crime that it is.
When an auditing report is falsified, means of repairing the pc are
denied, out tech and a need for re-study or re-drilling of materials is
covered up, out tech is spread about and the repute of the org and
Scientology are at risk.
There are many ways of falsifying an auditing report. Chief amongst
them is omission of vital data in the report. Another is faking the things
run or the pc's actions or reactions.
To the person doing this it may seem that he has covered up his
incompetence but in actual fact it is eventually detected.
A twice declared person recently messed up the cases of several VIPs by
simply omitting some of their disagreements with what was being done.
Three SPs, now declared, some years ago had a mutual understanding that
they would not put down each other's withholds. These three also falsified
auditing reports to the effect that they had run certain things on pcs "and
there was nothing on them," when in fact they either had not run them or
there was reaction which they did not put into the report. They messed up
about a dozen people before they were caught and it took many, many hours
of careful C/Sing and auditing to salvage those cases (and it also took
about two years). They made several hundred serious enemies for themselves
and today I doubt any Scientologist would even speak to them and their
names are remembered with scathing contempt.
It is not only easy to detect a falsified auditing report, it is also
inevitable that it will be detected.
The person whose auditing reports have been falsified is easy to spot
in folders and records. The auditor marks "VGIs, F/N" and the examiner
notes by-passed charge and Bad Indicators. An auditor seeking to prevent
this being detected has been known to take the examiner report from the
folder but that there is no examiner report would be the first thing a C/S
would notice. Examiner reports have been forged and exchanged with the
actual one but this too is very visible.
Lack of a proper success story points directly to out tech and if it is not
visible in the folder then that folder contains falsified auditing reports.
The pc in the midst of his auditing, refuses to re-sign for more. An
inspection of folder either finds the out tech in the auditing reports or
it doesn't. If the Folder Error Summary finds no out tech, the next thing
that is looked for is falsified auditing reports and this is extended to
looking at the other cases this auditor has handled to see if there is any
similarity of reaction.
A D of P interview with the pc will reveal falsified auditing reports.
It will contain data that does not appear in the auditing reports. The
first thing suspect is the auditing reports.
Basically, correct tech applied by a competent auditor who has been
trained and interned, works and works every time. When it "doesn't work," a
C/S begins to look for the real scene. There are many ways he can ascertain
the actual scene. Amongst these are outside-the-door session taping,
monitors, interviews, lack of success stories, failures to declare,
failures to re-sign, examiner reports at variance with the session reports,
personal check up into the case and many others.
The only thing which temporarily misleads a C/S is a falsified auditing
report. But in all our experience with these, the detection of such reports
is inevitable even if it occurs a long time afterwards.
The person who would falsify an auditing report is usually found to be
a suppressive with abundant R/Ses and evil intentions who never should have
been trained in the first place.
Therefore, the penalty for knowingly falsifying an auditing report in
order to make oneself seem more competent than one is or to hide departures
from the C/S or to omit vital data necessary to C/Sing, resulting in upsets
to a case and time spent in investigation by seniors, is actionable by a
Committee of Evidence and if the matter is proven beyond reasonable doubt,
a cancellation of all certificates and awards, a declare and an expulsion
order are mandatory.
Should the person perpetrating the falsification of auditing reports
run away (blow) before action can be taken, the result is the same and is
enforceable even if the person is not present.
A green auditor may look upon the offense as slight. If he is too
untrained to realize that proper application of tech works every time and
that improper application is a gross overt act, he may not realize the
seriousness of his action. This however cannot be pleaded as a defense. It
is not a light thing to end the hopes and close the door on a pc just
because one is trying to cover up his blunders. The blundering auditor can
be repaired by cramming and retraining. But only if it is known how he has
blundered. That in itself is nowhere near as serious as hiding the fact.
Honesty is the road to truth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lf
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 OCTOBER 1976
Remimeo
All HCOs (Also issued as HCO PL 28 Oct 76,
All Tech Divs same title )
All Courses
C/S Series 98
AUDITING FOLDERS,
OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS
(Ref: HCO PL 26 OCT 76 Issue I
HCO B 26 OCT 76)
Omissions from folders and complete loss of folders is a very serious
matter.
A Case Supervisor, as well as a Folder Error Summary Auditor and the
Auditor himself can be impeded greatly by folder omissions. Loss of folders
entirely is a much greater catastrophe.
While cases and even folders can be reconstructed and eventually
handled (at enormous trouble and time to the pc and technical people) this
does not minimize the offense.
Usually Folder Pages are regarded too lightly as a post and are subject
to much transfer even when posted. The Director of Tech Services is often
far too lax in posting a Folder Archives I/C even as a double hat. Space
restrictions often impede the careful preservation of folders in orgs. But
all these posts and spaces are vital to a smooth delivery of auditing and
should not be lightly looked upon.
The commonest (and most senseless) omissions from folders are:
1. WORD CLEARING WORKSHEETS. These are done in Academies or
training or Interne areas as well as the HGC and it is often an omitted
action to forward them to the person's pc folder. Often the lines to do so
are unknown or completely missing. Yet every metered word clearing action
should not only be the subject of a worksheet but also must be included in
the person's pc folder in date order. Word clearer can fail to F/N a chain
or even fail to clear a word as a chain when it doesn't F/N. Such goofs can
mess up cases and leave a C/S perplexed as to how the pc was running well
one day and badly the next-yet there is no word clearing worksheet there,
so the fact of ANOTHER AUDITOR on the case is hidden.
2. QUAL WHY FINDING ACTIONS. As why finding also includes listing,
possibly the most vicious omission is the failure to include Why Finding
worksheets in the person's folder or even do a worksheet on it. Yet at
least one org has been temporarily wrecked by indiscriminate "why finding"
in Qual that resulted in wrong items and wrong lists and messed up the
cases of whole staffs. This poor why finding has led at times to why
finding becoming a restricted or forbidden practice. Qual worksheets of why
finding MUST be included in the person's folder along with any list made
which itself must include the question asked.
3. HCO WHY FINDING. These actions must also be the subject of
worksheets and must also be included in the person's folder.
4. ALL SEC CHECKS AND INTEGRITY PROCESS LISTS AND ACTIONS. It doesn't
matter who or what is doing the sec check, the resulting action is NOT the
property of the department or branch or person doing the sec checking. A
full worksheet must be made and ALL such actions done MUST be included in
the routine pc folder of the person.
As it is very vital that a pc's folder be COMPLETE as well as exist,
hereinafter the loss of a pc's folders and the failure to make worksheets
and include them in the person's pc folder shall be actionable by a
Committee of Evidence, to be convened by the Senior C/S of an org, and
applies to any person or Auditor whether staff, mission or field.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt
Copyright � 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
SUBJECT INDEX
1972-1975
assess, assessment (cont)
A auditors who can't assess lists,
results of, 426
Hi-Lo TA Assessment, 1
aberrate, savage justice aberrates, why, 172 Trouble Area
Assessment, 83
aberration, artists are not benefited by ~, 232 assist(s), defn,
assisting individual to heal himself or
aberration, Q and A is simply postulate ~, 230 be
healed by another agency by remonng his
accidents occur in presence of suppression, 211, 237
reasons for precipitating, and prolonging his
actor, "stage manners",293 condition and lessening his
predisposition to
additive questions by auditor, 160 further injure
himself or remain in an intoler administration, administrative; see
also Auditor Admin able condition, 191; see also Dn
Today
Series [IX-1] areas to use assist on, 189,190
a piece of truth; see Dn Today Contact Assist; see
Contact Assist
ethics tech admin sequence, 78,172 drug "five days"
rule need not apply to assists, 192
Post Purpose Clearing, admin of, 363 drugs, assist
given over drugs, how to handle later,
PTS Rundown, administrative tech of, 95 192
recruiting staff, tech/admin ratio, 12 healing, assist
is entirely outside field of, 191
Whys, below, there is usually an Ethics situation,
medical treatment, assist is not substitute for, 189
100 necessary in lower zone of auditing, 206
adminstrator Q and A, 223 recovery, assist greatly speeds
recovery, 189
Advanced Organizations, Solo levels are only available
spirit, assist is entirely in field of spirit, 191
at, 23 summary, 189
alcohol, what it does to body, 207 steps, 191, 237
All Flows Rundown, results of, 288, 382 Temperature Assist;
see temperature, Assists
anaten is demonstration of loss of havingness, 123 Touch
Assist; see Touch Assist
antibiotics, administering of, effects of, 403-08 attention,
anti-perspirant for wet hands, use of, 416 case whose
attention is solidly fixed on something,
Anti-Q and A TR, 221 262
APA, American Personality Analysis; see OCA/APA
communication and, 185
ARC break(s), 370; see also rudiments fixed attention,
manifestation and result of, 262
are restimulated but missed or partially missed
introversion andattention, 262
withholds, 178,179 Attention Objective Decision
Repetitive [processl,
comes up in session must be handled, 409 263
false reads on W/Hs and asking for some W/Hs Attention
Subjective Repetitive [process], 262, 263
more than once will ARC break pc, 409 audience,
overts, auditor ARC breaks pc by demanding more art
for self-satisfaction vs. audience, 196
than is there or leaving overt undisclosed that
basics of appearing before, 293
will later make pc upset with auditor, 370 in
rapport is different than audience of spectators,
ARC Straight Wire triple, valuable action to do be-
298
fore, 389 auditing,
ARC Straight Wire using next-tolast list of Self
availability of different grades andlevels, 23
Analysis in Scientology, 121 code; see
Auditor's Code
arguments caused by failure to handle origination, 183 coma,
auditing of person in, 206
art, commonest error in, is failure to use
correction
for self-satisfaction vs. audience, 196
lists, 67
how good does a work of art have to be to be Dianetic
auditing; see Dianetics
good, 196,198,199, 200 drugs must be handled
first in, 300
quality alone has an emotional impact, 199
environment, 409
quality and form, 199 false TA, auditing pc over, 409
rhythm in art forms, 299 falsified auditing report
puts auditor at once at
technique of art, 197 retrain, 164
artists are not benefited by aberration, 232 flows, auditing
additional flows restimulates missassess, assessment,
ing flows and stacks them up as mass, 274, 377
AEI Treble Assessments, 277 gradient scales is inherent
in, 116
assessment for individual Why of evaluator taking
injured or ill people, auditing of, must be kept
a long time to evaluate, 145 fairly
light, 238
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
auditing (cont.) auditor(s)('s) (cont.)
LRH Model Auditing Tapes,33 environment, auditor is
responsible for session,
mass occurs when flows of items are by-passed
409
and then later restimulated by auditing them,
errors come from inability to confront, faulty
381 metering, misunderstoods or out-
ethics, 164
misunderstoods on basic words, auditing pc over,
evaluation, 160
410 exterior and good win, auditor carrying on
past
muzzled, means stating only Model Session patter
and asking "say or ask", handling of, 410
and commands and TRs, 160 falsifying report, how
to handle, 292, 386
outnesses, fast way to handle, is to give free audit-
firefight is quarrel between auditor and pc, 291,
ing check, 194 385
pc doesn't want auditing, handling of, 412 flub or
red tag, auditor action, 320
pc out of session, auditing over, 410 F/Ning something
else than question asked, is Q
pc~s introduction to auditing; see also Dn Today
and A, 222, 223
psychos, 264 handling of, 410
running out past bad auditing, 276 games condition,
auditors and pcs get into, only
Scientology isn't just processing, that's only one
when auditor refuses help to pc, 180
use of fundamentals, 202 goal of auditor and
pc, 110
self-auditing, commonest reason for,96 hand cream,
applying during session is wrong,
self-auditing, cure for, 242, 256, 353 handling
of, 411
Solo auditing, handwriting, poor, illegible
worksheets, 412
admin, 85 honesty of, determines his results, 26
C/S + pre-OT is greater than bank, 86 is an
individual; you can train individual auditors
difference between Solo auditing and self-audit-
not a mass of auditors, 12
ing, 85, 86 lists, auditor who can't get
reads on, consequences
Grade Chart steps before, [1972], 21 and
remedy of, 233, 234
ideal Solo program, 22 misunderstoods on
basic words, auditing pc over,
set-up, 20, 312 handling of, 410
test line is check on auditing quality, 31 needs his
periodic drills and exercises or he goes
time track, auditing itself is a sort of, earliest ses-
sloppy, 165
sion blows later sessions, 274, 378 orders,
auditor giving orders that are not part of
auditor(s)('s), any process is very bad, 160
ability as auditor related to his case, 110 OT TR Zero
and TR 0 are routine action for audi admin; see Auditor Admin
Series [IX-1 ] tors, 164
all auditors talk too much, 160 outnesses causing a
null prepared list, 213
ARC break in session, auditor not handling, rem-
overrunning due to false TA, handling of, 411
edy of, 409 pc, auditor calling pc's
attention to meter or TA or
assess, auditor who can't assess lists, results of,
hishandsinsession,handlingof,410
426 pcs, auditor's right to choose modified, 149
assessment weaknesses, remedy of, 233 pc + auditor is
greater than bank, 86
auditing pc who is out of session, handling of,
practice, it isn't "talent" that makes good auditor;
410 it is practice, 426
basics, auditor out basics, 409 Q and A, 222, 223
become an auditor; see Dn Today questions, asking odd
non-process questions while
case of auditor depends upon his skill in auditing,
"doing a process", 160
110 recruiting staff auditors, 12
Case Supervisor actions regarding auditor; see case
refusing to audit is in fact an admission, in most
supervising cases, of feared inability
to audit, 149
classificationandinterneships,programof,[1972],
results, auditor who doesn't consistently get, is
13 going to have his own case cave in on
him, 110
Class VIII handling of lower level auditors, 391
rights; see also Dn Today
Correction List-auditor recovery, 60 speed, error can
also stem from, 273
C/Sing in chair, handling of, 411 staff auditor
requirements, 12
C/S rein, even best auditors go bad when they no staff
auditor trainee programming, 12
longer have a tight, 165 stat of, 150
distracting pc, 160 test of, 427
"dog pcs", remedy for auditor with, 147 tone arm
and auditor; see tone arm
duplicate, auditor willingness to, 109 trainees come
under Interne Supervisor, 12,13
end phenomena, remedy of auditor errors in trainees,
personnelpools for, 12
handling, 273 training, sending auditors to
upper orgs for, 13
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
auditor(s)('s) (cont.) blowdown, listing and nulling item must BD
and F/N,
TRs and auditors; see TRs 96
two-way comm, auditor doing without C/S, hand- body,
ling of, 411 defn, physical object, it is not
the being himself,
understanding of pc's answer, 395 129
upper level auditors, 376 defn., a complex biological
carbon-oxygen engine,
what it takes to make a real auditor, 426
running at an operating temperature of 37�
who cannot audit, whose TRs are out, whose
Centigrade and, being biological, has ability to
metering is bad and who never keeps the Code
establish and repair itself, 401
always says his pcs are dogs, 147 and TR 0,
369
Auditor's Code is an auditing tool, not just a nice body
fixation, 203
idea, 289, 384 havingness, relation to body; see
havingness
avalanches, outflowing and inflowing, 106 life in, thetan
puts it there, 126
awareness, defn., ability to perceive existence of, 182
malnutrition is general breakdown of body func
if one can confront he can be aware; if he is aware
tions due to lack of adequate nourishment, 207
he can perceive and act, 182 nutrition is in
f1eld of physical treatment of body,
awareness of awareness unit; see thetan 205
Axioms, Dianetic; see Dn Today overweight is residual
elements of food, substances
Axiom 28, amended, 185 or gases which are not totally
eliminated or uti lized by body
after ingestion, 401
Q and A, 231
B cure for, is objective
processes, 232
robot's inertia of body, 129
backtrack, pcs who won't go, reasons and remedies sugar in
abundance by-passes basic energy produc for, 276, 388, 389
ing mechanisms of body, 207
bacteria, intestinal, 408 underweight or debility is
inadequate or lacking
balance, Chloro- and Aureo- families of antibiotics
foods, substances or gases which are needed for
can affect sense of balance, 406 activity,
maintenance or repair of body, 402
bank; see reactive mind "boil off" or dopey pc, cause and
remedy of, 117
basics, list of out basics and references to correct books,
Word Clearing Method 4 of, 166, 305
them, 409 boredom and game conditions, 113
BD; see blowdown BPC; see by-passed charge
been after, PTS RD step, 343 Buddha; see Hymn of Asia
beingness, 118 by-passed charge,
beingness, insistence on rightness is last refuge of defn,
earlier charge restimmed and not seen, 144
beingness,257 defn, one handled later charge
that restimmed
beings basically prosper only when they are self-
earliercharge, 144
determined and can be pan-determined to help
prepared lists, missing items on, leaves by-passed
in prosperity of all, 130 charge on pc,
426
betray, defn, to be disloyal or faithless to, 102 roller-
coaster can also be caused by, 339
betrayal, Danger RD step, person to work out how by-passed flows;
see flows, by-passed
out-ethics situation is betrayal of group, 103
biochemistry and nutrition, 204, 205
lie below spirit and mind and could be loosely
C
considered to be undercut as they do impede
spiritualgain, 203 calcium, muscular spasms are
caused by lack of,
may not work at all until stress is relieved by pro-
354
cessing, 206 Cal-Mag, formula and effect of, 354,
355, 369
"Biolactyl", dosage of intestinal bacteria, 408 cannibal,
cleared cannibal step, 260, 261, 263
black field, 124 Can't Have Rundown, 141
blackfive, 114 carbohydrates, result of heavy intake of, is to
feel
blackness, Case V is no mock-ups, blackness only, tired
all the time, 207
121 case(s); see also preclear
black screens, purpose of, 114 auditor's ability as
auditor related to his case, 110
blinking, TR 0 notes on, 369 black five, 114
blood leveling time and antibiotics, 403 bogged case, 11
blow(s), Case V, defn, no mock-ups, only blackness, 121
five main reasons for student blows, 193 children
are usually very burdened cases, 388
handling blown student or pc, 193,194 "corpse case",
solution to, 119
reasons for pc blows, 179,194 dog case; see
preclear, dog
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
case(s) (cont.) case supervising, case supervision, C/S (cont.)
drug case having trouble with Method 1 Word repair
and handling of bogged cases is finest skill
Clearing, handling of, 163 of, 11
energy, starvation for, is keynote of any case
repairing pc instead of auditor, handling of, 412
which maintains facsimiles in restimulation,
sessions, personally C/Sed by LRH; see Dn Today
105 Triple Dianetics, how to C/S case for, 284
"failed cases", prepared lists clear up, 426 Case Supervisor;
see also case supervising
"failed" cases, there are no failed cases; there are
auditors, flubby, are ones who consumed C/S
only failed C/Ses and auditors, 426 time,
164,165
failure in, chief cause is unhandled or only partial-
Cramming, C/S has to straighten out, 164, 233
ly handled drugs, 300 Crammmng, if there is no,
C/S can fully afford to
fixated attention case, 262 do cramming himself,
281
gains, drugs fog up student and prevent gains, 137,
D of P, C/S not using, to get data after failed ses 311
sion, handling of, 412
gains, pcs who do not hold, are PTS, 330, 338 makes
sure tech courses are taught well, 164
how to get information on, 11 overloaded, results of
and how to detect, 318, 319
mutual out ruds can stall cases, 259 postings, 318
no case gain or failed case, handling of, 427 Q and
A, 222, 223
OCA/APA characteristics in, 22 remedy for C/S who is
agreeing there are "dog
repair; see repair pcs", 147
roller-coaster is a slump after a case gain, 330, 338
stat of, 150
trouble and Word Clearing, 304 test of, 427
unburdening, 389 to get results on pcs must handle
auditor's ability
upset: wrong list item or wrong list, 97 to
get reads on lists, 233
case supervising, case supervision, C/S, case supervise;
trouble, what it comes from, 292, 386
see also Case Supervisor trying to fix "no EP'
on one rundown by trying
auditor C/Sing in chair, handling of, 411 to
run another rundown, handling of, 413
auditor falsifying report, how to handle, 292, types
of C/Ses, 318
386 worksheets, C/S not reading, handling of,
413
auditors, even best go bad when they no longer cause,
overts give highest gain in raising cause level,
have a tight C/S rein, 165 why, 370
auditors handling psychos, C/S takes it easy on, cause,
people who get things done are at cause; when
264 they are not, they Q and A, 225
auditors, standard handling of, 164 chain(s),
cases, how C/S gets information on, 11 can be overrun,
how, 385
checklist, 11 Dianetic chain, how to rehab, 289, 384
Class VIII C/S-6 list, 276 Dianetic chains previously
flubbed, how to handle,
co-audit, C/S must check routinely for mutual out
290, 384
ruds in, 259 Dianetic chains run a second or
third time, how to
C/S can err by being too critical of auditors or
handle and indicate to pc, 291
worse, by agreeing about what dogs the pcs are,
Dianetic EP, cognition could simply be "the chain
147 blew", 272
Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing, 285 Dianetics,
EP of chain is erasure, accompanied by
FES, failing to call for, when C/S doesn't know
F/N, cognition and good indicators, 272
after a failed rundown, 413 Word Clearing a chain
of words, all must F/N, 303
Ivory Tower; see Dn Today charge, by-passed; see by-passed
charge
must be sure all Why finding and Word Clearing children,
papers and worksheets get into pc's folders,
ascases, 388
96 must be permitted to contribute, 80
must put a yellow tab marked PTS on PTS pc
originations of, 183
folder, 92 Streptomycin can cause pregnant
mothers to give
pc in psychotic break, handling, 353 birth to
children who have impaired hearing,
pc's demands for next grade despite all contrary
404
indicators, C/S agreeing with, handling of,
unburdening, 389
412 cholesterol, role of in body, 204
prepared list is C/S's main tool for discovery and chronic
somatic; see somatic, chronic
correction, 234 circuits, all valences are circuits
are valences, 181
primary cause of C/S failure, 234 circuits key out with
knowingness, 181
Quadruple Dianetics, how to C/S case for, 374,
Classification Gradation and Awareness Chart, 311,
376
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Class VIII, Confessional List, Johannesburg, 419
Course, 391 Confessionals on students, 173
C/S-6 list, 276 confidential, why OT materials are ~, 23
how a Class VIII gets in standard tech, 391 confront, 182
cleaning cleans, how to prevent, 370 defn, to face without
flinching or avoiding, 182
cleared cannibal, 260, 261, 263 defn, to stand facing or
opposing, especially in
cleared word, defn, word which has been cleared to
challenge, defiance or accusation, 182
point of full conceptual understanding, 317
auditor errors come mainly from an inability to
clearing words in commands, necessity of, 93 164
clear words to F/N, 303; see also Word Clearing body and
TR 0, 369
co-audit, C/S must check routinely for mutual out effect,
person at effect is confronted by life, he
ruds in, 259 does not confront it, 231
cognition and havingness, 123 glib student, what he can
confront, 99
cognition, method of fishing for, 301 if one can confront he
can be aware; if he is aware
cognition of Dianetic EP could simply be "the chain
he can perceive and act, 182
blew", 272 Q and A and confront, 224
colds, loss can cause, 237 confusion, fixed ideas follow a period
of, 237
colds, Vitamin C is excellent for helping, 407 confusion,
underneath is a misunderstood word, 29
coma, auditing a person in, 206, 238 Contact Assist, 191
commands, auditor must clear each and every word continuous
missed withhold; see missed withhold,
of, 93, 94 continuous
Committee of Evidence, when to use, 100 continuous overt; see
overt, continuous
communicatingness, 118 "corpse case'~, solution to, 119
communication, defn, consideration and action of correction
lists; see prepared lists, correction lists
impelling an impulse or particle from source-
correction, Qual's function is, 188
point across a distance to receipt-point, with
correction usually cannot be accomplished without
intention of bringing into being at receipt-point
Ethics back-up, 66
a duplication and understanding of that which
course(s); see also training
emanated from source-point [Axiom 28], 185 fast
flow student passes ~ by attestation, 1 62
component parts of, 185 supervision, it is out tech
to fail to know and use
formula of: cause, distance, effect, with intention,
study tech, 41
attention and duplication with understanding,
Course Supervisor('s),
185 Correction List, 52
lag, defn, length of time, whether verbal or silent,
failure, cause of, 41
intervening between auditor's asking of a speci-
has to know study tech, not necessarily subject
fic question and specific and precise answer of
taught, 41
that question by pc, 108 primary tech, 42
magic of; see Dianetics Today product of Supervisor,
43
pc is as well as he can originate a ,1 83 student
queries, handling of, 42, 302
performer purpose is basically ~, 293 use of Word
Clearing Method 4, 29, 302
two-way communication, 107 cramming, 188
auditor doing without a C/S, 411 actions, 66
don't use a listing question in, why, 270
done in Qual must be done on a meter, 397
Interiorization RD, 2-way comm step after, 280
can assess correction lists, 66
pc upset, look into two-way comm processes in
Case Supervisor has to straighten out Qual cram
folder and treat them as L&N processes ming, 233
where pc has answered with items, 270 if
there is no Cramming, a C/S can fully afford to
questions must be limited to feelings, reactions,
do cramming himself, 281
significances, never ask for terminals or loca-
it is obviously senseless to cram someone whose
tions, 270 study tech is out, 66
complete, defn, to make whole, entire or perfect; maxim of:
handle the hell out of it, 335
end after satisfying all demands or require- most
cramming cycles reveal a broader area of
ments; act or action of completing, becoming
situation which must also be handled, 334
complete or making complete, 93 order always
includes TRs, 164
completion, pc completion points, 214 over out ruds, 334
completion, what makes it quickie, 93 Primary Correction
Rundown (revised), 65
concept symbolized by word, 316 retread and retrain, 164
conceptualization of meanings, 316 success, what it
depends on, 335
conceptual understanding of word, 317 Cramming Of ficer, C/S
makes sure Qual has one, 164
Conditions by Dynamics, 81 Crime, High; see High Crime
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
crime, when you let a person give nothing for some-
Dianetic(s) (cont.)
thing you are factually encouraging crime, 79
L3RD-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List, 265
criminal(s), criminality, 78 use of, 290
ethics presence checkscriminality, 78 never prepcheck
while doing, this mushes up
exchange and criminality, 79 engrams, 291,
385
welfare states, why they get lots of criminals, 79 "no
interest" items, 161
why punishment doesn't cure, 371 past life remedies,
388
critical tirades are restimulated but missed or partially
pc who doesn't go past lives doesn't recover, 330,
missed withholds, 178 339
critical, upset, ARC breaky pc, handling of, 179
Quadruple; see Quadruple Dianetics
C/S; see case supervising; Case Supervisor R3R commands,
background data, 243
culture, education mustn't skip gradients in, 171
Scientology and Dianetics, essential difference
cycles, diseases have their own, 406 between, 107
Standard Dianetics is very general in
application,
68, 87
D student ill, handled by
Dianetics, 76
upsets, handling of, 291, 385
Danger Condition, correct ~ handling, 82, 84, 100 use of,
274, 284; see also Dianetics Today
Danger Rundown steps, 102,103,104 who can run Manetics, 291,
386
Danger Rundown, Why of robotism can be added to, Zero Flow
in Dianetics may F/N very suddenly; it
130 is easily overrun and can be very
fast, 288, 382
datum, defn, invention which has become agreed
dictionaries,whichare the best, 151
upon and so solidified, 114 diet, proper, 208
and truth, 114 diet, search for the natural diet of man,
401
decision, Attention Objective Decision Repetitive Director of
Processing, actions of, 150, 412
[process], 263 Director of Processing's stat, 150
declare, pc declare? procedure, 218 Director of Tech Services,
actions and stat of, 150
degradation begins when thetan is interiorized into
Disagreements Check, 40
unwanted mass, 105 disconnect or handle, 209
degraded being(s), 230, 235 disease cycles, 406
deliveryofbabies,handledwithassists, 189 dishonest, defn,
disposed to lie, cheat, defraud or
Department of Personnel Enhancement, 65 deceive, 102
determinism scale, robot band of, 127 continuous missed
withhold, probably all disDianetic(s), 289; see also R3R;Dn Today
honest social conduct brings about, 235
chain, how to rehab, 384 D of P; see Director of
Processing
chains previously flubbed, how to handle, 290, D of T/S;
see Director of Tech Services
384 dog pc; see preclear, dog
chains run a second or third time, how to handle dopey or
"boil off" preclear, cause and remedy of,
and indicate to pc, 291 117
end phenomena, 272 downstat areas, executive must
investigate and find
erasure; see erasure any out-ethics situation
and correct it, 100
Expanded Dianetics; see Expanded Dianetics downstat, when
you reward a ~ you not only deprive
Full Flow Dianetics, 274, 284, 286, 374, 378; see
upstats, you also cave the in, 80
also flows dramatization, dramatize, dramatizing, defn,
to act
completing unfinished flows in, 275, 378
under influence of past incidents as dictated by
cost of, 379 those incidents in bank,
336
do not audit four flow items until all earlier
insane cannot control or withhold their evil pur
Dianetic items brought into four flows, 377 poses and
dramatize them at least covertly, 128
if pc's TA begins to average higher, overrun is
withholds, dramatization of, 336
occurring, 290, 385 on vital
information lines, 336
Int-Ext RD and, 285, 375 remedy for, 337
requires flawless auditing and C/Sing, 292, drills,
auditor needs his periodic drills and exercises or
386 he goes sloppy, 165; see also
training
result of, 275, 379 drug(s); see also Dianetics Today
tripling earlier Dianetics, 274, 377 assist
given over drugs, how to handle later, 192
Int-Ext RD is essentially a Dianetic, not a Scien- can
prevent going backtrack, 388
tology,action,291,386 case who cannot be gotten
through Method 1
is its own field of C/Sing, 285 Word Clearing
due to case, it is usual to give
list can produce wrong list reactions, 97 him
Drug Rundown first, 137,163
L3RC-Dianetics and Ext RD Repair List, 245 chief
cause of failure in cases, 300
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
drug(s) (cont.) E-Meter(s) (cont.)
"five days" rule need not apply to assists, 192 Drill
21 is E-Meter drill to be drilled on Word
fog up a student and prevent gains, 137
Clearing Method 4, 28, 301
have not been handled or only partially handled, help
pc by guiding his attention against needle, 180
No Interference Zone rule is waived, 300 pc,
most often pc does not know what it is that
items that have read are run R3R without asking
reacts as only unknowns react, 180
for interest, 161,169 pc's attention must be on
his own case in session,
must be handled first in auditing, 300 not
on meter, 27, 410
student has been on drugs, must be given a Drug
reads; see reads
RD, 76 rock slam, real R/S also has a crazy
meter, 344
unhandled drugs and Ethics, 300 sensitivity setting
for individual cases, 271
withdrawal symptoms, how to handle, 354 tone arm;
see tone arm
Drug Rundown, 312 untrained people using, results of, 97
can fail by asking for interest on items, 169 Word
Clearing on meter, all words must be F/Ned,
effects of an omitted or incomplete Drug RD are
303
severe enough to deny a person any lasting case works
only when there is a correct electrical con gain, 311
tact, 226, 415
is a must before Ex Dn, 307 emotional impact in art, 198,199
is a must before Solo, 21 emotional shock, handled with
assist, 189
Life Repair is not a prerequisite for Drug RD, 311 emotions
list, Fear of People RD, 219
student has been on drugs, must be given a ~, 76 End of
Cycle Processing, 118
students who are or have been on drugs need a ~ end
phenomena, 272; see also Dianetics Today
before tackling Word Clearing Method I, 137 defn,
those indicators in pc and meter which show
dry and wet hands make false TA, 226, 415 that a
chain or process is ended, 272
duplicate, duplication, 109 Dianetic end phenomena, 272
auditor's willingness to, 109 errors, 272
communication and, 185 Interiorization Rundown end
phenomena, 280
OpeningProcedurebyDuplication, 108,109 Introspection
Rundown, end phenomena of, 241,
process of duplication itself balances out and
256, 353
makes person easy about his past, 109 OTs and
EPs, 273
training and duplication, 110 PFimary Correction
Rundown, end phenomena of,
dynamic(s), 159
Conditions by Dynamics, 81 PTS Rundown end phenomena,
331, 340
Exchange by Dynamics, procedure, 80 attained
when the person is well and stable, 92
person under stress is actually under a suppression
types of EPs, 272
on one or more dynamics, 209 energy,
Service FacsbyDynamics, 257 energy reducing processes
at length "starve"
1st Dynamic Danger Formula, 103 thetan for
energy, 105
3rd dynamic sanity, hattedness is basic of, 38
Remedy of Havingness, effect of on pc's energy,
108
starvation for, is keynote of any case
which main E tains facsimiles
in restimulation, 105
sugar in abundance by-passes basic energy
pro
eating is a matter of absorbing death, 125
ducing mechanisms of body, 207
educating illiterate or semiliterate populations, 170,
thetan's relation to energy, 105
171 "value" of energy, 109
education and superliteracy, 314 engram(s); see also R3R
effect, communication and, 185 basics of engram running,
243
effect, person at effect is confronted by life, he does
Dianetics, never prepcheck while doing, this mushes
not confront it, 231 up engrams, 291, 385
effect, when person is running at effect he Qs and As, pc
who cannot run engrams, reasons for, 276
231 slow recovery after an engram has been run,
cause
electronic attest, 165 of, 237 ~
Elementary Straightwire, 107 environment, auditor is responsible
for session en
E-Meter(s); see also E-Meter reactions by name
vironment, 409
check at Success, 31 EP; see end phenomena
cleaning cleans, how to prevent, 370 erase, erased,
erasure(s),
cramming actions must be done on ~, 397 chains
erased can be overrun, how, 291
data, never feed to pc, 289, 384 Dianetics, EP of chain
is erasure, accompanied by
dead bodies read between 2.0 and 3.0, 24 F/N,
cognition and good indicators, 272
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
erase, erased, erasure(s) (cont.) ethical, ethic(s) (cont.)
thetan has to be at earliest end of incidents to out-
ethics (cont.)
erase them, 286, 381 valence, person whose
ethics have been out over
you can't rehab erasures with "How many
a long period goes "out of valence", 101
times?", 290, 384 personal ethics, 100
Est O and HAS Specialist Auditing Program (revised),
situation lies below administrative Whys, 100
50 tech admin sequence, 78
Est Os and Product Officers, disagreement amongst, evaluate, length
of time to, 145
40 evaluation, auditor evaluation, 160
Est O, standard ~ action to survey hats, 37 evil,
ethical, ethic(s), 78 inability to confront evil, result of,
78
defn., study of general nature of morals (morals
insane are insane because they have evil intentions,
[plural] [noun]: principles of right and wrong
230
conduct) and specific moral choices to be made
man attempts to restrain himself from evil actions
by individual in his relationship with others;
and caves in, 78
rules or standards governing conduct of mem-
purposes, 277
bers of a profession, 102 Expanded
Dianetics running of, don't ask-for
defn., study of general nature of morals and of
interest, 161
specific moral choices to be made by individual
have to be verified as to wording and checked
in his relationship with others,172
for read before running, but not interest,
actions, reason for many heavy, 78 277
acts of out-ethics person in a group, 101
individual with, has to withhold himself be conduct, most important
zone of, in an organiza- cause he may do
destructive things, 127
tion is at or near the top, 100 insane
cannot control or withhold evil purposes
correction usually cannot be accomplished with-
and dramatize them at least covertly, 128
out Ethics back-up, 66 rock slams,
where a pc R/Ses he will have evil
criminality checked by ethics presence, 78
purposes, 345
determination, when one is ethical it is by own
Rundown, Multiple-Flow, 277
determination, 172 R3R all Ev Purps cuUed
from folder is done as
executives and ethics, 100, 101,102 first
action in Ex Dn, 277
justice and ethics, 172 R3Ring Ev Purps,
common error on, 296
must be in to get tech in, 172 reactive mind tends to
force man into evil actions,
non-compliance as Liability, and false report as
370
Doubt, 79 Examiner attest check, 30
offenses, examples of, 101 Examiner declare? procedure, 218
organization and ethics, 100 exchange, defn., something
for something, 79
out-ethics, defn., an action or situation in which
criminality and exchange, 79
an individual is involved contrary to ideals
Dynamics, Exchange by, procedure, 80
and best interests of his group; an act or
flows and out-ethics, 78
situation or relationship contrary to ethics
maintains inflow and outflow that gives a person
standards, codes or ideals of the group or
space around him and keeps the bank off of
other members of group; an act of omission
him, 79
or commission by an individual that could or
out, illness and overwhelm can result from, 79
has reduced the general effectiveness of a
production, morale and exchange factor, 80
group or its other members; an individual act
executive('s), defn, any person holding an executive
of omission or commission which impedes
post (head of Department or above), 100
the general well-being of a group or impedes
assignment of Danger condition, 100
it in achieving its goals, 102 ethics and
executives; see ethics
auditing errors can come from, 164 study,
executives who will not, handling of, 158
exchange flows and out-ethics, 78 tendency
to transfer or who fails to hat others,
executives, responsibility of, to handle out-
how to handle, 50
ethics, 100 existence, mock-ups get unreal because
thetan is not handling steps (Danger RD), 102
ising existence, remedy for, 118
ill, people who are ill are PTS and are out-ethics
Expanded Dianetics, 276, 311; see also Ex Dn Series
toward the person or thing they are PTS to,
[IX-125]
101 defn., that branch of Dianetics which
uses Dia people, out-ethics people go rapidly into Trea-
netics in special ways for specific purposes, 68,
son against the group, 101 87
perception is affected by out-ethics, 101 after
Grade IV Expanded, 311
quickie tech is a symptom of out-ethics, 94
auditor prerequisite for, 69, 88
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Expanded Dianetics (cont.) fast flow training, 162,163
charges for, 69, 88 Fear of People List, 219, 220
Drug Rundown is a must before, 307 FES; see Folder Error
Summary
evil purposes, R3R all, is done as first action, 277 FFD,
Full Flow Dianetics; see Dianetics, Full Flow
is specifically adjusted to pc, 68, 87 FFT, Full Flow Table;
see Dianetics, Full Flow
OCA right-hand side handling, Vital Info RD field,black, 124
belongs on, 328 firefight, defn, quarrel between
auditor and pc, 291,
pcs who RIS are given Ex Dn, 76, 345 385
programming, 276 First Dynamic Danger Formula, 82
Repair List, 70 fixated attention case, anatomy and remedy
of, 262
requisites, 297, 372 floating needle, F/N(s)(ed)(ing),
running of evil purposes or intentions, don't ask
auditor must F/N the original action, 222, 223,
for interest, 161 410
service facsimile theory and, 257 false TA and F/N, 227,
416
set-ups, 276 footplates obscure F/Ns and reads, 414
checklist, 297, 372 Integrity Processing
questions must be F/Ned, 175
Standard Dn vs. Ex Dn, 68, 69, 87 listing and nulling
item must BD and F/N, 96
training, 68, 87 OT is particularly subject to F/N
abuse as he can
uses Dianetics to change OCA/APA, 68, 87 blow
things quite rapidly, 273
who needs it, 68, 87 persistent F/N and ending
session, 397
Expanded Gita, 115,120 Power can be done quickie simply by
not hanging
exterior, exteriorized, exteriorization, on for EP
and only going to F/N, 93
Int RD, you just don't do one because pc goes
prepared list either reads or F/Ns, 213
exterior, 280, 281 students who are
interrupted too often when
pc exteriorizes on a good win, how to end session
F/Ning may also blow, on a "withhold of
when, 397, 410 nothingness", 193
pc goes exterior in auditing, later his TA goes high,
what you ask or program, 222
then you do an Int RD, 280 wide persistent with
TA too high or low means
pc misemotion about, how to handle, 124 false
TA, 227, 416
Present Time Differentiation; Exteriorization by Word
Clearing, all words must be F/Ned, 303, 304
Scenery [process] ,121 Zero Flow in Dianetics
may F/N very suddenly,
Remedy of Havingness [process], exteriorization
288,382
by, 116 flow(s),
theory of Exteriorization Remedy, 287 additional, when
doing additional flows one must
Exteriorization Rundown; see Interiorization Run- also
check or rehab flows runto F/N, 287, 381
down auditing additional flows while earlier
items
extroversion, defn, being able to look outward;
remain Single or Triple restimulates missing
extroverted personality is one who is capable of
flows and stacks them up as mass, 377
looking around the environment; person who is
auditor's lack of knowledge of flows, doing F0s on
capable of looking at world around him and
a Triple pc, handling of, 410
seeing it quite real and quite bright is of course
by-passed flows and mass, 286, 380
in a state of extroversion, 241, 256, 353 by-
passed, high TAs, heavy pressures and even ill
ness can come from by-passed flows, 286, 380
Dianetic remedies and Triple Flows,
285
F Full Flow Dianetics; see
Dianetics, Full Flow
getting in all flows, 287, 288, 381
"failed" cases, 426 mass occurs when flows of items are by-
passed and
false, defn., contrary to fact or truth; without then
later restimulated by auditing them, 287,
grounds; incorrect; without meaning or sinceri-
381
ty; deceiving; not keeping faith; treacherous;
missing flows are still potential mass, 274, 377
resembling and being identified as a similar or
old pcs run Triple, let them remain Triple unless
related entity, 102 you have to do Int RD
or some Quad RD, 373
falseauditor'sreports;seeauditor,falsifyingreport run
previously unrun one or ones first to get
false PTS, 236 charge off, then verify or run ones
listed as run
false reads on W/Hs and asking for some W/Hs more
already, 287, 381
than once will ARC break the pc, 409 safe
course is to use Triples (Quad only) on new,
false reports, 129 never audited before pcs; those
begun on
means Doubt, 79 Triples, use then only Triple
Flows, 29 1, (386)
robot gives many, 129 TA, high TA and Quad Flows, 381
false TA; see tone arm, false TA, high TA and Triple
Flows, 287
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
flow(s) (cont.) Gita, defn, Give and Take Processing, 115
Triple reruns, 286 Expanded Gita, 120
and Quad reruns, 380 glib student, characteristics of
and handling, 99
tripling earlier Dianetics, 274, 377 gonorrhea, cycle of,
406
unrun, law: when one or more of the three flows good vs.
evil, 78, 370
of an item or grade are left unrun, when used in Grade
Chart, basic program of pc, 311, 313
later processes the earlier unrun ones restimu-
grades, full list of grades showing where various RDs
late and make mass, 286, 380 fit, 312
when to triple or quad narrative items or multiple Grade II,
311
somatic items, 275, 378 gradient scales is inherent
in auditing itself, 116
Flow 0, defn., self doing something to self, 274, 378 gradients,
education mustn't skip, 171
auditor doing F0s on a Triple pc, handling of, 410
grammar(s), 143, defn, a systematic description of
command, 378 the ways in which words are used
in a particular
getting in Zero Flows-rehab or run, 382
language, 167
in Dianetics, may F/N very suddenly, 288, 382
Course before Word Clearing, 143
Int RD, one mustn't suddenly introduce 4th flow rules
of, 167
(F Zero), 377 textbooks, 143
Introspection RD has as its dominant flow, 295 types
of grammars, 168
Quad Dianetics, unrun F0 is checked for read grammatical
words and smallwordsshouldbe looked
before running, 374 up in a simple grammar
textbook, 143
Quad Dianetics, when catching up unrun Flow Green Form, 238,
321
Zeros only run those that read, 373 group justice,
128
running Zero Flows, 288, 382 action of group
against individual when he has
Triple pc, doing F0s on, 410 failed to get
his own ethics in, 172
Flow 1, defn, something happening to self, 274, 378 with
Courts and Comm Evs, 100
Flow 2, defn, doing something to another, 274, 378 group prospers
only when each member in it has his
Flow 3, defn, others doing things to others, 274, 378
own personal ethics in, 101
folder(s), guilty, making an individual guilty for committing
study, 157 evil actions only increases tendency
to laziness,
Why finding worksheets must go into pc folder,
370
96, 303
Word Clearing worksheets must be placed in pc
folders, 96, 304 H
Folder Error Summary (FES), counts on C/S's and
auditor'sstat, 150 hand(s),
Folder Error Summary, C/S failing to call for an FES anti-
perspirants applied to too wet hands, 227,
when he doesn't know after a failed rundown,
416
handling of, 413 auditor applying hand cream
during a session is
food; see nutrition wrong, handling of, 411, 415
footplates, 27,414 auditor must not call a pc's attention
to hands
Full Flow Dianetics; see Dianetics, Full Flow
during a session, 410, 414
Full Flow Table; see Dianetics, Full Flow rings on pc's
hands must be removed, 364
tone arm depends on normally moist
hands, 226,
415
G tone arm low, don't get pc to
wipe hands every
minute, 27
gain; see case gains tone arm low, wet sweaty hands can
cause, 24
game, vanishing cream, why one doesn't use, 414
conditions, 113 handwriting, handling auditor having poor ~,
412
auditors and pcs get into, how, 180 happiness is
only attained by those who are honest
boredom and game conditions, 113 with
themselves and others, 101
havingness is "gimmick" or "weenie" for which happiness,
pc's sanity and happiness absolutely de-
the game is played, 118 pend upon his
ability to create new facts, 114
thetan cuts down knowingness to create a game, HAS
Rundown, 50
112,113 hat(s), hatting,
GE; see genetic entity basic of 3rd dynamic sanity,
hattedness is, 38
generalities won't do in Integrity Processing, 176 essential
part of, is Post Purpose Clearing, 363
genetic entity and sacrifices, 125 failing to hat others,
how to handle, 50
germs and virus, 403 for product, 38
GF; see Green Form survey for orders, 37
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
have, Can't Have Rundown, 141 havingness (cont.)
havingness, 105,123,181 Repair of Havingness vs. Remedy
of Havingness,
defn, mass or objects, 115 124
defn, the "gimmick" or "weenie" for which the
rudiments and havingness; see Dn Today
game isplayed, 118 SPs are SPs because they
deny hav and enforce
defn, is the concept of being able to reach;
unwanted hav, 141
no-havingness is the concept of not being able
subjective havingness, difficulty with running, 141
to reach, 181 unhappiness, relation to reduced
energy (having-
anaten is demonstration of loss of havingness, 123
ness), 105
cognition and havingness, 123 withholds cut
havingness down, 181
indicators of dropped havingness, 123 HCO Dept 1 is
recruiting point for auditors, 12
knowingness, cutting down knowingness and headache and Int-
Ext, 307
Remedy of Havingness have opposite vectors, healing,
Scientology's relation to, 191, 203
113 health, food can vastly affect, 401
must be run to get the benefit of having pulled H E & R,
defn, human emotion and reaction, 194
most withholds, 181 out list produces most
fantastic H E & R, 194
process, 124 hearing, Streptomycin can cause pregnant
mothers to
reason for dropped havingness, 117 give birth
to children who have impaired ~, 404
RemedyofHavingness,105,108,112,115
help,auditorsandpcsgetintoagamesconditiononly
defn., remedy of a pc's native ability to acquire
when auditor refuses help to pc, 180
things at will and reject them at will, 115
hidden standard, defn., special problem pc thinks
defn, getting pc to mock up and shove into the
must be resolved before auditing can be seen to
body enough masses to bring him to a point
have worked, 262
where he can eventually throw one away,
fixated attention shows up as a problem but is
124 usually a hidden standard, 262
defn, having him mock up and shove in and High
Crime, course, 41
throw away the same type of mock-up; High
Crimes, study tech, 42
Remedy of Havingness is always a super- High
Crime, word clearing words on test is, 32
ior operation to a Repair of Havingness,
highTA;see tone arm, high
124 Hi-Lo TA Assessment, 1
body disappears while remedying havingness, honest,
honesty,
how to handle, 124 auditor, honesty of,
determines his results, 26
commands for, 114 happiness is only attained
by those who are, 101
End of Cycle Processing is a cousin process to
is road to sanity, 79
Remedy of Havingness, 118 most successful
student is ~ student, 1 72,1 74
Expanded Gita related to Remedy of Having- road
to truth is begun with honesty, 150
ness, 115 sanity is basically honesty and
truth, 31
Exteriorization by Remedy of Havingness [pro-
Hubbard Graduate Dianetic Specialist, 69, 88
cess] ,116 Hubbard, L. Ron, hat of finder of lost
tech worn by,
have pc shove or push things into his body,
202
never pull, 116 Hubbard, L. Ron, personally C/Sed
sessions; seeDia how to run Remedy of Havingness, 116
netics Today
is done and can be done at any time during any
hypnotism, defn., a monotony and a central fixation
of the Six Basic Processes as long as pc is
on some one object, 109
even vaguely in communication with audi-
Opening Procedure by Duplication runs out, 109
tor, 118
process, 115
Waterloo Station Iprocess], difficulties with,
due to pc inability toremedyhavingness, 125
I
what it addresses, 113
will actually give pc enough energy masses to
permit his starved condition to let go of
ideas,fixed ideas follow a period of confusion,237
energy masses he is holding to him, 108 ideas,
words symbolize ideas, 316
Repair of Havingness, defn, having pc mock up ill,
illness(es); see also injury
anything he can mock up, and in any way it
assist illness only by lightest possible address to
can be done get him to shove (never pull)
mental factors, 206, 238
that mock-up into the body, and by similar
cause of illness, 209
means to get rid of the residue which went
deserve to be handled with thorough and complete
alongwithmock-up, 124 assists, 189
is a one-way flow; it is an inflow, 124
exchange, ~ can result from out exchange, 79
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
ill, illness(es) (cont.) injured, injury, injuries (cont.)
flows, illness can come from by-passed flows, 286, occur
in presence of suppression, 237
287, 380, 381 person is out of present time,
237
healing, two sides to, spiritual and structural or
physical facts of, 190
physical, 189,191 insane are insane because they
have evil intentions;
loss, person who has just experienced a loss may
but they can't even make these stick, 230
become ill, 237 insane, truly insane cannot control or
withhold their
pc illness during grade auditing, 192 evil
purposes and dramatize them, 128
pcs should not be run on PTS RD as a standard Integrity
Processing,
practice, 331, 339 generalities, best way to
"miss" Integrity Process person who doesn't produce becomes
mentally or ing question is to let pc indulge in, 176
physically ill, 80 "Have I missed a withhold
on you?" can be used if
physical ailments can resist spiritual improvement,
pc gets upset or critical, 179
205 how to prevent ~ being left unflat, 175
physical facts of injuries, ~ and stresses, 190 new
auditors routinely believe that in ~ pc knows
predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of
answer and won't give it; this is an error, 180
illness, 189, 210 pc withholdy, insert "Have
I missed an Integrity
PTS, Processing question on you?", 177
all sick persons are, 95, 209 questions must
be F/Ned, 175
becoming PTS is first thing that happened to
specialist who cannot read a meter is dangerous,
person on subject of illness or accidents, 211
why, 179
people who are ill are PTS and are out-ethics
intention, communication and, 185
toward person or thing they are PTS to, 101
intentions,
person who is chronically ill always is PTS, 19
don't ask for interest on intentions before running
results in illness and roller-coaster and is the
the item, 161,169
cause of illness and roller-coaster, 91, 92
good, are never run, 277
Q and A and illness, 224, 225, 232 in AEI Treble
Assessments, 277
stress is basic cause in physical illness, 206 you
can only list and run connected with termi
student is ill, handled by Dianetics, 76 nal
or mass or somatic, never significance, 277
temperature, when illness is accompanied by, anti-
interest,
biotics is usually the first thought, 403
Dianetic "no interest" items, 161,169
illiteracy and work, 170 drug items that have read are run
R3R without
imaginary incidents as past life remedy, 330, 339, 388
asking for interest, 161, 169
impingement needed to make a list read, 234 Expanded
Dianetics running of evil purposes or
implants, when Word Clearing too heavy or doesn't
intentions, don't ask for interest, 161
clear up, suspect implants, handling of, 96
repair of "no interest" items, 169
inactivity, how it comes about, 1 27, 1 30, 370, 37 1
Interiorization Remedy, theory of, 38 1
incident(s), Interiorization Rundown, 291
pc stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or and
the 4th flow, 373, 377, 386
books, how to handle, 389 auditor auditing pc
over Int-Ext misunderstoods,
thetan has to be at earliest end of incidents to
handlingof,410
erase them, 286, 381 C/Sing Int RD, 280
thetan is incident hungry, 286, 381 disability of
auditor in running Int RD, 281
incompetent, basic Why for being, 130 end phenomena, 280
indication, wrong, can cause a psychotic break, 239, Full
Flow Table and , 285, 375
241, 249, 346, 353 HCO Bs covering, 279
inertia, physical, and robotism, 129 headache and ~, 307
infections, germ and virus infections, 403 is a remedy, 280
infections, Vitamin C is excellent for helping colds is
essentially a Dianetic, not a Scientology, action,
and ~, 407 291, 386
inflow, repair of havingness is, 124 out, source of high
TA, 24
information; see datum; knowledge overrun, it usually happens
that an ~ is, 280
information, vital; see vital information pc goes exterior
in auditing, later his TA goes high,
injured, injury, injuries; see also illness then you
do an Int RD, 280
acute and severe, assist only by lightest possible
purpose of, 281, 381
address to mental factors, 206 repair of Int
RD, 280
auditing of injured people, keep light, 238 L3RD-
Dianetics and Int RD Repair List, 265
causes of predisposition, precipitation and pro-
requires flawless auditing and C/Sing, 292, 386
longation of, 189 roller-coaster can also be
caused by a bad , 339
don't confine handling to touch assist, 190 two-way
comm step follows a day or so after, 280
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Interiorization Rundown (cont.) justice (cont.)
unnecessary, when is Int RD unnecessary, 279 group
justice, 100,128
when to run, 279, 280 savage justice aberrates because
it prevents getting
interneships, 12 off withholds, 172
Interviews, PTS, 98
intestinal bacteria, 408
Int RD; see Interiorization Rundown K
introspection, defn., (L. from introspicere, to look
within) a looking into one's own mind, feelings, Key
Word Clearing; see Word Clearing Method 6
reactions, etc.; observation and analysis of one-
knowingness, 118
self, 240, 250, 347 awareness of awareness unit
builds space to cut
Introspection Rundown, 239, 249, 260, 262, 346 down
knowingness, 112
auditor requirements for, 240, 250, 347 circuits
key out with knowingness, 181
caution, 296 cutting down of knowingness and Remedy
of
dominant flow is Flow 0, 295 Havingness have
opposite vectors, 113
end phenomena of, 241, 256, 353 thetan cuts down ~ to
create a game, 112,113
essence of, 240, 250, 347 knowledge; see also datum; vital
information
fixated attention, 262 basic knowledge of man is
essential to any im
Flow Zero command for, 275 provement in any area
of human race, 171
programming ~ to fit the pc, 260 organization, main
product of, is knowledge and
steps of, 240, 250, 260, 295, 347 results obtained
with it, 337
theory of, 240, 250, 347 Scientologists and public,
knowledge bridge must
introversion, defn., (from intro + L. vertere, to turn)
be in, 202
a tendency to direct one's interest upon oneself
to the average person is only this: a knowledge of
rather than upon external objects or events,
hisorherwithholds,l78
240, 250, 347 Know to Mystery Scale described, 112
attention and introversion, 262
evidence of, 262
invalidate, invalidating, invalidation, L
button on lists, 213
past lives, don't invalidate, 330, 338 L&N; see listing and
nulling
pc being made to go on past a win acts as, 194 latent
reads, caused by too high sensitivity, 271
remedy for invalidation of past lives, 388 laziness and
dishonesty, source of out tech, 426
"Invent a problem that person (weak universe) could lazy and
inactive, how a person becomes, 370
be to you" [process] ,125 liability, non-compliance
as Liability, 79
IP; see Integrity Processing life in body, thetan puts it there,
126
"irresponsible pc", how to get withholds off, 176 life is a
repeating pulse and ebb and surge of motion,
isolation of person in psychotic break, 260 299
item(s), Life Repair is not a prerequisite for Drug RD, 311
found out of session or by a non-auditor is suspect list
(s); see also listing and nulling
of being a listing and nulling error even though
auditor failure to get a list to respond or note it
no list was made, 96 then defeats C/S
completely, 234
list, nothing produces as much case upset as a
auditormustcleareachandeverywordon,94
wrong list item or a wrong list, 97 auditors
who can't assess lists, results of, 426
"Whys have been found" but person is not doing case
upset, wrong list item or a wrong list, 97
well; this is case of wrong item, 157 correction
lists; see prepared lists, correction lists
Dianetic list can produce wrong list
reactions, 97
failed sessions, most common
reason for, is in J ability of
auditor to get reads on lists, 233
if a pc lists to a question the rules
of L&N apply,
Johannesburg Confessional List, 419 419
justice, it takes correct metering and impingement to
defn, 1. moral rightness, equity; 2. honor, fair-
make alist read, 234
ness; 3. good reason; 4. fair handling, due re-
no-case-gain, slow-case-gain, sickie and "failed
ward or treatment; 5. administration and pro-
cases", handled by basic lists, 426
cedure of law, 102 out lists, 157
defn action of group against individual when he
all of more violent or bad reactions on part of
has failed to get his own ethics in, 172
pc come from, 97
causing withholds, results of, 172 (meaning
overlist or wrong items) produces
executive's Ethics and Justice hats, 100
most fantastic H E & R, 194
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
list(s) (cont.) malnutrition, defn, general breakdown of body func
out lists (cont.) tions due to lack of
adequate nourishment, 207
roller-coastercanalsobecausedby,339 man is basically
good, but reactive mind tends to
symptoms of out lists, 97 force him into
evil actions, 78, 370
listing questions used accidentally in two-
mass(es),massy,
way comm can give out list symptoms,
are more important than perceptions, 106
270 degradation begins when thetan is
interiorized into
prepared lists; see prepared lists unwanted
mass, 105
remedy for an auditor who can't get reads on lists,
flows, missing flows are still potential mass, 274,
233, 234 286, 287, 377, 380, 381
wrong lists or upset people, what can cause, 97
havingness is mass or objects, 115
listing; see listing and nulling Havingness, Remedy of, what
it is, 124
listing and nulling, preclear has felt massy, sometimes
even ill, cause
auditor must grab the actual sense of answer,
of, 287, 381, 382
395 thetan's loss of mass, 105
errors, L4BR, 138 thetans, massy, 286, 380
item must BD and F/N, 96 Material Clearing, Word Clearing
Method 5, 152
listing out of session, cause of, 96 meanings,
conceptualization of, 316
listing question, don't use in two-way comm, why, medical
doctor(s),
270 minister and medical doctor, no conflict
between,
listing questions governed by rules of ~, 270
192
pc upset, look into two-way comm processes in
Scientology sends sick to medical doctor, 203
folder and treat them as L&N processes where medical
examination and treatment and assists, 189
pc has answered with items, 270 mest, thetan creates
mest to have a game, 112
PTS Rundown, L&N for places and planets should mest
universe, dwindling spiral of, 105
be restricted to planets only on VA pcs and an
meter; see E-Meter
L4BR used at first sign of trouble, 142 methods of
Word Clearing; see Word Clearing
PTS Rundown two-way comm question converted Method 4; see
Word Clearing Method 4
to ~,142 mind monitors structure, 205
reconstructing the list, 96 minister, actions and tools of,
191
self-auditing, commonest reason for, is a wrong or
missed withhold(s); see also rudiments
unfound L&N item, 96 ARC broken pc, how to ask
for ~,179
Why finding, purpose or product, suspect listing
continuous missed withhold, 235, 236
errors when repairing, 96 is often falsely
labeled PTS, 236
literacy, defn, ability to read and write, 314 Integrity
Processing and , 179
locations, PTS to, 98 is a should have known, 179
loss, person who has just experienced a loss may be-
natterings, upsets, ARC breaks, critical tirades, lost
come ill, 237 students, ineffective
motions are restimulated
low TA; see tone arm, low but missed or partially
~,178
LRH Model Auditing Tapes, use of, 33 mistakes or accidents or
injuries occur in presence of
Iying, pc's sanity and continued happiness absolutely
suppression, 237
depend upon his ability to create new facts,
misunderstood word(s);seealso Word Clearing
114 auditing pc over, references to handle, 410
Iying, Routine 2-29: "Start Lying", 114 confusion, underneath
confusion is a ~, 29
L3 EXD RB-Expanded Dianetics Repair List, 70 person with
technical query has ~, how to handle,
L3RC-Dianetics and Ext RD Repair List, 245 424
L3RD-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List, 265 student with,
will pour out a torrent of queries, 42
L3RD, how to use, 290, 384 tests, misunderstoods on, 32
L4BR-for assessment of all listing errors, 138 use Method
4 Word Clearing when fishing for, 301
L4BR is used at first sign of trouble on L&N, 142 morale,
L IX Hi-Lo TA List revised, 1 production is basis of ~,
38, 80,129
L10 prerequisites, 392 production, morale and exchange
factor, 80
L10, when done between R6EW and OT III, will fail, robot goes
into morale declines easily, 1 29
20 morals, defn, principles of right and wrong
conduct,
102; see also ethics
motions, ineffective, are restimulated but
missed or
M partially missed withholds,
178
motion slowness, 236
magnesium, nervous reactions are diminished by, 354,
motivators, persons looking for overt to explain ~,
369 371
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Multiple-Flow E. Purp Rundown, 277 Operating Thetan (cont.)
muscles, nervous muscles can be cured with calcium- EPs,
OTs and, 273
magnesium, 369 is particularly subject to F/N
abuse as he can blow
muscular spasms are caused by lack of calcium, 354
things quite rapidly, 273
musicianandstagemanners,293 levels, there are perhaps 15
levels above OTVII
music, six distinct types of rhythm, 298 fully
developed, 202
Mutter TR, 395 materials, why they are confidential, 23
mutual out ruds, 259 OT III, OT VII, OT IIIX, explanation
of sequence
muzzled auditing; see auditing, muzzled of, 23
M/W/H; see missed withhold R6EW-OT III No Interference Area,
20
mystery, Know to Mystery Scale described, 112 operations
handled with assists, 189
mystery, thetan could be called a "mystery sand- oral penicillin
is worthless, it has to be shot vith a
wich" in that he tends to stick in on mysteries,
needle, 407
237 orders, auditor giving ~ that are not part of any
pro
M4; see Word Clearing Method 4 cess is very bad, 160
orders, basic Why for needing, 37,127,130
organization and ethics, 78, 100; see also
ethics
N organization's main product, 337
origination(s), 183, 395; see also TR 4
narrative, when to triple narrative items or multiple
arguments caused by failure to handle, 183
somatic items, 275, 378 how to handle, 183,184
natterings means there are missed withholds, 178
originations of a child, 183
needle; see EMeter; needle characteristics by name OT; see
Operating Thetan
nervous reactions are diminished by magnesium, 354 OT Zero and TR 0
are a routine action for auditors,
no-case-gain, slow-case-gain, sickie and "failed cases",
164
handled by basic lists, 426; see also case gain out
basics and how to get them in, 409
no game conditions, 112 out-ethics; see ethics, out-ethics
No Interference Area, R6EW-OT III, 20 outflow and exchange, 79
non-compliance as Liability, and false report as out lists; see
lists, out
Doubt, in Ethics, 79 out tech; see technology, out
nulling and F/Ning prepared lists, 213 overload, what it is, 319
null prepared list, auditor outnesses causing, 213 overrun(s),
overrunning,
nutrition, 203, 401, 407 are demonstrated by a rising TA,
290, 385
auditor ~ due to false TA, handling
of, 411
cause of overrun and underrun, 273
O chains can be overrun, how, 291,
385
Full Flow Dianetics, if pc's TA begins
to average
objective, defn., of or having to do with a material
higher, overrun is occurring, 290, 385
object as distinguished from a mental concept,
when is Int RD overrun, 280
idea or belief; means here and now objects in
Zero Flow in Dianetics is easily ~, 288, 382
PT as opposed to "subjective", 393 overt(s), overt
act(s),
objective processes, anyone can be brought more into
auditor ARC breaks pc by demanding more than is
present time with, 393 there or leaving
an overt undisclosed that will
objective processes, cure for Q and A with body, 232
later make pc upset with auditor, 370
objective processes vs. subjective processes, 393 commonest
cause of failure in running, is "clean
objective rundown, 393 ing cleans", 370
OCA/APA, continuous overt act, 235, 236
does not measure OT band of abilities, 22
effectiveness of ~ in processing, 370
Ex Dn uses Dianetics to change ~, 68, 87, 328 give
highest gain in raising cause level, why, 370
is a graph which shows desirable and undesirable high
TA, overt is a common source of, 24
characteristicsin a case, 22 pc who dives
into past lives when asked for ~,
Opening Procedure by Duplication, effects of, 108, 371
109 perception decreases in proportion to number
of
Opening Procedure of 8-C, 107, 108 ~,128
Operating Thetan, products, 128
band of abilities, OCA/APA does not measure, 22 PTS
handling, person not responding to PTS hand
behavior, 206 ling, check continuous overts,
236
degraded being and OT, difference between, 230 PTS's
overts on SP person make him blind and
Dianetics, when doing Triple on Clears and OTs,
non-self-determined, 129
chains may be missing or just copies, 275
withholds and overts, two special cases of, 235
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
overweight, defn., residual elements of food, sub- potential
trouble source('s) (PTS), 19, 89, 91, 95,
stances or gases which are not totally elimi-
98, 141, 209, 330, 338; see also roller-coaster
nated or utilized by body after ingestion, 401
defn., someone connected to a person or group
overwhelm and illness can result from out exchange,
opposed to Scientology, 91
79 defn., person connected to a suppressive
person, 95
overwhelm, chronic, handling of, 224, 225 characteristics
of PTS persons, 95
Oxford Capacity Analysis; see OCA/APA condition is actually
a problem and a mystery and
a withdrawal, 98
C/S must put a yellow tab marked PTS
on a PTS
P pc folder, 92
false PTS, 236
pan-determined, beings basically prosper only when handling,
209, 330, 338; see also PTS Rundown
they are self-determined and can be ~ to help
alternate wordings for "PTS", 97
in prosperity of all, 130 basic actions:
discover, handle or disconnect, 209
paresis, condition of untreated syphilis; it is a lifetime
must be handled in Ethics and given a PTS Run cycle
and drives one crazy, 406 down, 76
particle, communication and, 185 person does not
respond to PTS handling easily,
past lives; see also Mission Into Time check
continuous missed withholds and/or
don't invalidate, 330, 338 continuous
overts, 236
pc who dives into ~ when asked for overts, 371
steps, 91, 210, 330, 338
pc who doesn't go past lives in Dianetics doesn't
"unburdening", 211
recover, 330, 339 illness and PTS; see
illness
remedies, 388 Interviews, 98
AESPs that "would make one unwilling to go
past PTS Interviews, 342
earlier than this life", 388
questions, 98
running past lives as imaginary incidents, 330,
to discover PTS condition are done on meter
339, 388 with all reads
marked, 98
"patty-cake", 224 out-ethics conduct toward suppressive
personality
pc; see preclear he is connected with for person to
have become
pc completions-second revision, 214 PTS in first
place, 101
PCRD; see Primary Correction Rundown overts on SP person
make him blind and non-self
penicillin, oral penicillin is worthless, it has to be shot
determined, 129
with a needle, 407 pcs who do not hold their
gains are PTS, 95, 330,
people, Fear of People List-R, 219 338
pep, 207 phenomena, 330, 338
perceive, if one is aware one can perceive and act,
psychotic, relation of PTS person to, 209
182 robots and PTS, 129
perception(s), robot toward SP person or group or thing,
129
decreases in proportion to number of overt acts-
roller-coaster, cause of, is PTS, 19, 92, 330, 338
and therefore withholds-which person has
situation, only PTS situation that is serious and
committedonwholetrack,128 lasting and can
cause a roller-coaster comes
how to turn on, 106 from having known the
person before this life,
is affected by out-ethics, 101 330, 339
masses are more important than perceptions, 106
suppressive persons are themselves PTS to them
personal ethics, 100 selves, 95
Personnel Enhancement, Department of, 65 to someone or
something, 97
personnel pools for auditor trainees, 12 to SP people,
groups, things or locations, 98
philosophy, silence in, 327 when someone is suppressed he
becomes a ~, 330,
physical, body is a physical object, it is not the being
338
himself, 129 when you do get person or group
or thing or loca
physical illness; see illness tion PTS person will
F/N VGI and begin to get
physical inertia, 129 well, 98
physical treatment of body, nutrition is in field of,
withholding himself from a suppressive person or
205 group or thing, 129
planets, PTS RD step, 142, 343 Power,
Post Purpose Clearing, 363 auditor waits for specific EP,
272
post trouble remedied by Word Clearing Method 6, can be
done quickie simply by not hanging on for
153 EP and only going to F/N, 93
postulate aberration, Q and A is simply , 230 is
available at Saint Hill Orgs, 23
postulatingness, 118 requires flawless auditing and C/Sing,
292, 386
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
"PR", defn., putting up a lot of false reports to serve
preclear(s)('s) (cont.)
as a smoke screen for idleness or bad actions,
past lives (cont.)
78 pc who doesn't go past lives in
Dianetics
PRD; see Primary Rundown doesn't recover, 330,
339
preclear(s)('s); see also case pc who won't go
backtrack, reasons for, 276,
ARC broken pc should be asked "What withhold
388
have I missed on you?" or "What have I failed
Scientology Review action to make pc go back to find
out about you?" or "What should I have track, 389
known about you?", 179 protest against a
question, how it is demonstrated,
attention fixated, manifestations of, 262 370
attention must be on his own case in session, not red
tabbed must be repaired within 24 hours, 303
on meter or his hands, 27 responsibility,
raising pc's, 263
attention on chronic somatic, how to handle, 126 rock
slams indicate an area of psychosis which will
auditor actions regarding pc; see auditor ruin
pc's life if allowed to go unhandled, hand
bank, pc + auditor is greater than bank, 86 ling,
345
being made to go on past a win acts as invalidation,
self-auditing pc, cure for, 242, 256, 353
194 sick pcs should not be run on PTS RD as
standard
blows, reasons for, 193,194 practice, 331, 339;
see also illness
Case Supervisor actions regarding pc; see case super-
stuck in upsetting incidents from movies or books,
vising how to handle, 389
completions, 214 suppressed pcs and PTS tech, 95; see
also potential
critical, upset, ARC breaky pc, handling, 179
trouble source
doesn't want auditing, handling of, 412 upset,
look into two-way comm processes in folder
"dog pcs", 147 and treat them as L&N processes
where pc has
are problems in repair, 149 answered with
items, 270
cause of, 149 withholds, pc giving another's,
176
errors behind "dog pcs", 148 withholdy on IP,
insert "Have I missed an Integrity
HGC, whole HGC getting "dog pcs", 147
Processing question on you?", 177
do not hold their gains are PTS, 330, 338; see also
predisposition, precipitation and prolongation of ill
potential trouble source ness, 210
dopey or "boil off", cause and remedy of, 117 pregnant,
Streptomycin can cause pregnant mothers
engrams, pc cannot run, reasons for, 276 to
give birth to children who have impaired
exteriorization, handling; see Interiorization Run-
hearing, 404
down pre-OT, C/S plus pre-OT is greater than bank, 86
exteriorization, pc misemotion about, how to han- pre-OT
must not self-audit, 85
dle, 124 pre-OTs do not C/S their own folders, 86
exteriorizes on good win, how to end session, 397 prepared
list(s), defn., is one which is issued in an
flubbed pcs, handling, 320 HCO B and is used to
correct cases, 213
folder; see folder auditor outnesses causing a null
, 213
goal of pc, 110 clear up "failed cases", 426
Grade Chart is basic program of pc, 313 correction
list(s),
illness; see illness Auditor Correction List, 60
in psychotic break, C/S would have to locate last
Course Supervisor Correction List, 52
severe wrong indication, indicate fact to pc, and
Cramming can assess correction lists, 66
get it corrected as first action, 241, 256, 353
pc is flubbed or red tagged, auditor takes pc
in recent shock of having died won't go backtrack,
back in at once and repairs any error with
388 correction list for that action,
320
in trouble and not in trouble, 287, 382 PTS
RD Correction List, 89
is always wiUing to reveal, 180 Study Correction
List, 16
is as well as he can originate a communication, 183
Word Clearing Correction List, 304
Iying, pc's sanity and continued happiness abso-
Word Clearing or auditing, commonest error in,
lutely depend upon his ability to create new
is failure to use correction lists, 67
facts, 114 C/S's main tool for discovery and
correction, 234
massy, sometimes even ill, cause of, 287, 381
F/Ning, defn., on calling it whole list item by item
new pcs, auditing, 291, 373; see also Dn Today
is to F/N, 213
out lists, all of more violent or bad reactions on
missing items on, leaves BPC on pc, 426
part of pc come from, 97 not reading but not
F/Ning, 213
past lives, use of suppress and invalidate buttons
and mis pc who dives into past lives when asked for
understood word tech on prepared list, 213
overts, 371 word clearing lists for prepared
lists, 366
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
prepcheck, never prepcheck while doing Dianetics, produce, person
who doesn't produce becomes men-
this mushes up engrams, 291, 385 tally or
physically ill, 80
present time, anyone can be brought more into pres- product,
defn., always something someone can have,
ent time with objective processes, 393 44
Present Time Differentiation; Exteriorization by hat on
product before doing anything else, 38
Scenery [process] ,121 orders and products,
37
run psychotic cases on, 121 org's main product, 337
present time, Opening Procedure of 8-C is putting pc overt
products, 128
into contact with what is present time, 108
people not knowing their products require con
present time problems, ARC breaks and withholds all
stant orders, 37
keep a session from occurring, 178; see also Product
Clearing,
problem; rudiments correction, 96
pressures, high TAs, heavy pressures and even illness Full
Product Clearing Long Form, 44
can come from by-passed flows, 286, 380
"quickie" Product Clearing, 39
pretense, def~, false reason or excuse; a mere show steps
of, 39
without reality, 102 TA and Product Clearing, 49
Primary Correction Rundown, 65, 133, 157; see also production is
the basis of morale, 38, 80
Primary Rundown production, morale and exchange
factor, 80,129
checklist, 134 Product Officers, 40
end phenomena of a ~,159 program, programming,
handling, 157 F/N what you ask or program, 222
pre-PCRD steps, 158 Grade Chart is basic program of
pc, 313
purpose of the PCRD is to get the person through
Introspection Rundown to fit the pc, 260
the PRD, 137,157 major Why of falling hours,
incomplete programs
when the PCRD is given, 133 and other confusions,
149
Primary Rundown, 135; see also Primary Correction protein, sugar
vs., 207
Rundown protest, pc's protest against a question,
how it is
actions in HGC are case handling and Word Clear-
demonstrated, 24, 370
ing Method 1, 76 protest reads come from just plain
annoyance with hav
consists of Word Clearing and study tech; it makes
ing to go on, 10
a student super-literate, 135 provisional
certificate expires after one year if not
handling of Study Tapes, 75 validated, 162
keynote of Primary Rundown is honesty, 135 psychiatry and
psychology, primitive though pretend non-PRDs, 163 ing
being advanced, 202
product, 77,135 psychos, C/Sing and auditing psychos, 264
super-literacy is end product of PRD, 155 psychosis,
rock slams indicate an area of which will
steps, 136 ruin pc's life if allowed to go
unhandled, 345
Tech Div Primary Rundown, 76,135 psychotic(s),
use of Word Clearing Method 4, 77 are PTS if only to
themselves, 209
Word Clearing Method 8 is an action used in the
break,
Primary Rundown, 155 isolation of person
in, 260, 263
primitiveculture,exampleofeducatinga~,170 pc in, C/S
would have to locate last severe
prior confusion, 237 wrong indication, indicate
the fact to pc and
problem; see also present time problems get it
corrected as first action, 241, 256, 353
fixated attention shows up as a problem but is
what it is, 239, 249, 346
usually a hidden standard, 262 wrong
indication can cause, 239, 249, 346
hidden standard is special problem pc thinks must
relation of PTS person to psychotic, 209
be resolved before auditing can be seen to have
run psychotic cases on Present Time Differentia worked,
262 tion, 121
"Invent a problem that person (weak universe) PT; see
present time
could be to you" [process] ,125 PTP; see present time
problem
PTS condition is actually a problem and a mystery PTS; see
potential trouble source
andawithdrawal,98 PTS Rundown, 19, 89, 91, 95, 98,
141, 209, 330,
process, auditors asking odd non-process questions
338;seealsopotentialtroublesource
while "doing a process" and giving odd orders is
administrative tech of PTS Rundown, 95
very bad, 160 commands of PTS Rundown, 332, 340
processes, energy reducing processes at length Correction
List, 89
"starve" thetan for energy, 105 C/Sing a PTS
Rundown, 91
processing; see auditing end phenomena, 331, 340
produce, one has to produce to have, 80 attained when
person is well and stable, 92
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
PTS Rundown (cont.) Quadruple Dianetics (cont.)
end phenomena (cont.) pcs, new and old, rules about
Triple and Quad,
whole point of a PTS Rundown is to make a
373
person not PTS any longer, 91
quadrupling earlier Dianetic items, 377
flows of PTS Rundown, 332, 340 reinstated, 373
L&N for places and planets should be restricted to unrun
F0 is checked for read before running, 373,
planets only on VA pcs and an L4BR used at
374
first sign of trouble, 142 use of Quadruple
Dianetics, 374, 377
points of breakdown of the ~, 331, 339 who to run on,
373
PTS must be handled in Ethics and given a ~, 76 Qual('s),
reasons a PTS RD does not work, 19 Admin, product
of, 188
references, 340 C/S has to straighten out Qual
cramming, 233
repair of ~,19, 340, 343 C/S makes sure Qual has a
Cramming Officer, 164
sick pcs should not be run on PTS RD as standard does
not take orders on what to do to correct, 188
practice, 331, 339 function is correction, 188
steps, 141, 331, 340 pcs, Qual does not correct pcs,
Tech does, 320
that does not work has not been done correctly, Tech
and Qual actions, 320
19 queries, technical queries, 42, 424
two-way comm question converted to L&N, 142 "quickie", 93
valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS
defn., brush-off "lick and a promise", 39
RDs, 331, 339 defn., not doing all steps and
actions that could be
when to run, 339 done to make a perfect whole, 93
who does PTS Rundown, 330, 338 defn., omitting
actions for whatever reason that
Why of robotism can be added to ~,130 would
satisfy all demands or requirements and
punishment, why it doesn't cure criminality, 371 doing
something less than could be achieved, 93
Purpose Clearing, instant, 363 defn, something done or
made in a hurry; a hur riedly
planned and executed program (as of
studies), 93
Q
Q and A, 223, 230 R
defn, one did not get an answer to his question;
not getting compliance with an order but ac- rapport,
defn., relationship, especially, one of mutual
cepting something else, 230 trust or
affinity, 298
defn., Q and A is simply postulate aberration, 230
audience in rapport participates, 298
administrator Q and A, 223 RD; see rundown
auditor Q and A, 222, 223 reach, havingness is concept of
being able to ~, 181
body Q and A, 231 reactive mind,
cure for, is objective processes, 232 dramatize
is to act under influence of past inci
cause and Q and A, 225 dents as dictated by those
incidents in bank,
C/S Q and A, 222, 223 336
cure of Q and A, 223, 224, 225, 232 exchange
maintains inflow and outflow that gives
effect and Q and A, 231 a person space around
him and keeps the bank
illness and Q and A, 232 off of him, 79
is a kind of illness; chronic overwhelm; handling man
is basically good, but reactive mind tends to
of, 224, 225 force him into evil
actions, 370
reason for Q and A, 224, 230 pc + auditor is
greater than bank, 86
state of person who Qs and As, 231 Solo auditing:
C/S + pre-OT is greater than bank,
TR4 exists so that pc's origins are accepted and
86
not Qed and Aed with or invalidated, 289, 383
read(s); see also E-Meter
Quad and Triple reruns, 380 latent reads, caused by too high
sensitivity, 271
Quad Flows and high TA, 381 prepared list either reads or
F/Ns, 213
Quadruple Dianetics, protest reads come from just plain
annoyance with
auditor errors in running Quad Dianetics, 383
having to go on, 10
auditor requirements for ~, 375, 383, 386 remedy for
an auditor who can't get reads on lists,
cancelled, 279 233
Clears and OTs, Quadruple Dianetics on, 379
requirements for making a list read, 234
C/Sing Quad Dianetics, 374, 376 wrong ways to get a pc
to read between 2.0 and
narrative items or multiple somatic items, when to
3.0 on an E-Meter, 24
triple or quad, 378 reading aloud is Word Clearing
Method 7, 154
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
receipt-point, 185 rock slam(s) (cont.)
recruiting staff auditors, 12 handling, also called the
Responsibility RD, 277
red tab; see red tag indicate an area of psychosis which
will ruin pc's
red tag, red tagged, life if allowed to go unhandled,
345
handling, 320 pcs who R/S are given Ex Dn, 76, 345
pc is flubbed or ~, auditor takes pc back in at real
R/S also has a crazy meter, 344
once and repairs any error with correction list
rings on pc's hands cause a false ~, 364
for that action, 320 where a pc R/Ses he will
have evil purposes and be
pc ~ must be repaired within 24 hours, 303 on a
succumb as a result, 345
Word Clearing errors are red tabbed, 303, 304 rock
slammer(s), 344
refund, overloaded C/Ses can be reason for huge are
considered security risks for staff purposes,
refund ratio in org's GI-CGI, 318 344
rehab(s), rehabbing, checklist to assist identification of
~, 344
chains, 289, 384 is different from someone with a
rock slam, 345
erasures, you can't rehab erasures with "How roller-
coaster, defn, a slump after a gain, 330, 338;
many times?", 290, 384 see also
potential trouble source
flows, when doing additional, one must also check can
also be caused by a bad Int RD or Int repair,
or rehab flows run to F/N, 287, 288, 381, 382
out lists, BPC of other descriptions, 339
liability of rehabs, 286, 380 cause of, is PTS, 91,
92, 330, 338
religion, role of, 192 only PTS situation that is serious
and lasting and
religion, why Scientologyis, 107 can cause a roller-
coaster comes from having
remedy, remedies, defn., correction of any aberrated
known the person before this life, 330, 339
condition, 115 pcs who roller-coaster
(regularly lose gains) are
Interiorization Rundown is a remedy, 280, 281
PTS, 95
Remedy of Havingness; see havingness, Remedy of person
who roller-coasters is always PTS, 19
repaired, pc red tabbed must be ~ within 24 hours, 303 Ron; see
Hubbard, L. Ron
repairing the pc instead of the auditor, 412 Route 1-5,117
Repair of Havingness; see havingness, Repair of Route 2-29:
"Start Iying", 114
repair of "no interest" items, 169 R/S; see rock slam
repetition, rhythm is rhythm because of ~, 298 rudiment(s)
(ruds); see also ARC break; missed withreports, false, 129
hold; present time problem
resistive students, 158 ARC breaks, PTPs and withholds
all keep a session
Responsibility Rundown, 277 from occurring, 178
responsible, responsibility, end phenomena, 272
raising pc's, 263 mutual out ruds, defn, two or
more people who
refusal to take ~ for actions, 127
mutually have ruds out on wider group or
service facsimile, facsimile part is actually a self-
other dynamics and do not get them in, 259
installed disability that "explains" how he is
can stall cases, 259
not responsible for not being able to cope; so
C/S checks for mutual out ruds, 259
he is not wrong for not coping, 258
handling of mutual out ruds, 259
step, Expanded Dianetics, 260 out ruds, don't cram
over out ruds, 334
restimulation, starvation for energy is keynote of case rundowns,
integrity of, 264
which maintains facsimiles in ~,105 R
(number); see Routine (number), except R3R and
retread and retrain, 164 R6 [below]
reveal, pc is always willing to reveal, 180 R3R; see also
Dianetics; engrams
rhythm, 298, defn., any kind of movement character-
commands, 378
ized by regular recurrence of strong and weak
background data of, 243
elements, 298 drug items and Ev Purps
that have read are run
rightness, insistence on rightness is a last refuge of
R3R without asking for interest, 161
beingness, 257 evil purposes, common
error on R3Ring, 296
rings on pc's hands cause a false rock slam, 364 evil
purposes, R3R all Ev Purps culled from folder
road to truth is begun with honesty, 150 is
done as first action in Ex Dn, 277
robotism, 127 flubs, 285, 375
key to presence of continuous M/W/Hs and/or
imaginaryincidents canbe run R3R,388
overts, 236 inadequacy of a completely rote
system, 244
rock slam(s), defn, crazy irregular slashing motion of
procedure; see also Dianetics Today
needle; it can be as narrow as one inch or more
R6EW-OT III No Interference Area, 20
than a full dial in width, but it's crazy; it
slams
back and forth; it is actually quite startling to
see one, 344
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
session(s) (cont.)
S auditor is responsible for ~
environment, 409
exteriorization and ending session,
397
S&Ds; see Search and Discovery failed sessions, most
common reason for, is inabili
sanity, ty of auditor to get reads on lists,
233
basically honesty and truth, 31 false TA must be
handled before , 411, 414
hattedness is basic of 3rd dynamic ~, 38 listing
out of session, 96
honesty is road to sanity, 79 LRH model tape
sessions, 33
pc's ~ and continued happiness absolutely depend pc
out of session, 410
upon his ability to create new facts, 114 pc's
attention must be on his own case in session,
Scientologists and public, knowledge bridge must be
not on meter or his hands, 27
in, 202 TR 0 exists so auditor is not ducking
~ but can sit
Scientology('s), there relaxed, doing his job, 289, 383
current state of the subject and materials, 201 Short Hi-
Lo TA Assessment C/S, 228, 282, 308, 356,
development of Scientology, 201, 202 398
Dianetics and ~, essential difference between, SHSBC
checksheet should consist only of chronologi 107
cal materials, studied in chronological order,
isn't just processing, that's only one use of funda-
201
mentals, 202 sick; see ill
medical doctors and Scientology,203,204 significance,
Attention Subjective Repetitive, never
relation to healing, 203 run on significance,
263
road to truth; he who would follow it must take
significance, you can only list and run intentions con true
steps, 203 nected with terminal or mass or somatic
never
uses of Scientology, 202 significance, 277
why Scientology is a religion, 107 slowness, 128
Search and Discovery (S&D), robotness or slowness are keys to
presence of con
errors, 211 tinuous missed withholds or
overts, 236
new S&Ds (3 S&Ds), PTS RD step, 342 society, actual
barrier in society is failure to practice
past S&Ds, PTS RD step, 340 truth, 203
Self Analysis in Scientology, ARC Straight Wire using Solo
auditing; see auditing, Solo
next-to last list of, 121 somatic(s),
self-audit; see auditing, self chronic somatic, pc
attention on chronic somatic,
self-determined, beings basically prosper only when
how to handle, 126
they are self-determined, 130 chronic
somatics, remedy, 121
self-determined, PTS's overts on SP make him blind multiple,
when to triple or quad narrative items or
and non-self-determined, 129 multiple
somatic items, 275, 378
self-determinism, fixed attention results in unaware- SP; see
suppressive person
ness of other things than object of fixation and
space, exchange maintains inflow and outflow that
lessening of ~ to a point of other-determinism,
gives a person space around him and keeps bank
262 off of him, 79
self-listing, cause of, 96 space, thetan, awareness of awareness
unit, builds
sensitivity, E-Meter, errors, 271 space to cut down
knowingness, 112
service facsimile, defn, picture containing an explana-
spectators, audience in rapport is different than audi tion
of self condition and also a fixed method ence of
spectators, 298
of making others wrong, 258 spirit; see thetan
by Dynamics, Ex Dn RD, 257 spiritual state of person
predisposes injury and illness,
facsimile part is actually a self-installed disability
189
that "explains" how he is not responsible for stage
manners, 293
not being able to cope; so he is not wrong for
Standard Dianetics; see Dianetics
not coping, 258 stats of C/Ses and auditors, D of P
and Dir of Tech
handling, 258 Services, 150
session(s), steering pc, 180
antibiotics, person on antibiotics is given vitamins
stomach and bowel complaints, handling of, 407,
before session, 405 408
ARC breaks, PTPs and withholds all keep a session
Straightwire, ARC; see ARC Straight Wire
from occurring, 178 Straightwire, Elementary; see
Elementary Straight
ARC break that comes up in session must be han-
wire
dled,409 Streptomycin can cause pregnant mothers to
give
auditing itself is a sort of time track, earliest ses-
birth to children who have impaired hearing,
sion blows later sessions, 274 404
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
stress(es), Success, meter check at, 31
is basic cause in physical illness, 206 succumb, where a
pc R/Ses he will have evil purposes
nutrition and biochemistry may not work at all
and be on a succumb as a result, 345
until stress is relieved by processing, 206 sugar,
result of heavy intake of, 207
person under stress is actually under a suppression sugar
vs. protein, 207
on one or more dynamics, 209 sulfa drugs, 406
structure, mind monitors, 205 super, defn, superiority in size,
quality, number or
stuck point, handling, 238 degree, 314
student(s); see also training super-literacy, super-literate,
314
blows, reasons for, 193 end product of Primary
Rundown, 135, 155
interrupted too often when F/Ning may also
Supervisor; see Case Supervisor; Course Supervisor
blow, on a "w/h of nothingness", 193 suppress
and invalidate, use of on prepared lists, 213
restimulated but missed or partially missed
suppressed, suppression; see also potential trouble
withholds, 178 source
Confessionals on students, 173 mistakes or accidents
or injuries occur in presence
drugs fog up a student and prevent gains, 137; see
of, 237
also drugs pcs and PTS tech, 95
fast flow student, 162,163 person under stress is
actually under a suppression
passes courses by attestation, 162 on
one or more dynamics, 209
glib student can confront the words and ideas; he PTS,
when someone is ~ he becomes, 330, 338
cannot confront the physical universe or
PTS who finds the "good hats" suppressive, 98
people around him and so cannot apply, 99
suppressive person(s),
handling of students or even executives who will are
SPs because they deny hav and enforce un
not even go to study, 158 wanted hav, 141
honesty of a student, 172,174 are themselves PTS to
themselves, 95
idle student, 158 cleared, situation of, 260
paying students, 15 syphilis, effects of and cure, 406
queries, handling of student queries by Course
Supervisor, 29, 42, 302, 424
questions about "What is meant", reason for, 29,
T
42, 302, 424
real Why of failed students, 41 TA; see tone arm
recovering students and pcs, 193 tapes, LRH Model Auditing,
33
resistive students, 158 tapes, Study Tapes, 75, 76, 77
symptoms of students who are withholding, 173
tapes,WordClearingMethod4Of,166,305
who succeed, 172 teachers, "teaching" vs. using study tech,
42
Student Hat and Study Tapes, 76, 77 Tech Div corrects its own
flubbed pcs; it does not
Student Rehabilitation List, 359 send them to Qual, 320
study, technical, technology (tech),
Correction List, 16 aspects of out-ethics, 101
cramming a person is a waste of time if he never
ethics must be in to get tech in, 172
learned to study, 65 ethics, tech, admin
sequence, 78,172
part-time study on next level while auditing is a hat
of finder of lost tech worn by Ron, 202
failure, 15 out tech,
students or even executives who will not even go
course supervision, it is out tech to fail to know
to study, handling of, 158 and use
study tech, 41
Tapes, Primary Rundown handling of, 75, 76 C/S
overloaded is a potential cause of, 318
tech, source of, is only laziness and dishonesty,
426
course supervision, it is out tech to fail to know
queries, cause of, and handling, 424
and use study tech, 41 quickie tech is a
symptom of out-ethics, 94
Course Supervisor is a specialist in, 43
standard tech, how a Class VIII gets in, 391
cramming, it is obviously senseless to cram
study; see study tech
someone whose study tech is out, 66
verbal tech explanations, result of, 424
High Crimes, 42 teeth or gums get sore, push in lots
of Vitamin C,
Primary Rundown and, 135 407
Supervisor has to know study tech, not neces-
temperature,
sarily subject taught, 41, 42 Assists,
238
subjective, defn, proceeding from or taking place in
bringing down, with antibiotics, 403, 404, 405
an individual'smind, 393 illness, when
accompanied by temperature, anti-
objective vs. subjective processes, 393
biotics is usually the first thought, 403
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
test line is a check on C/S and auditing quality, 31 tone arm
(TA) (cont.)
tests, why question sheets for tests must not be word
footplates generally give wrong TA position and
cleared, 30, 32 obscure F/Ns and reads, 414
thetan(s)('s), high TA,
cannot die; his only out is to try to stop something
and low TAs do not widely F/N, 227, 416
as he himself cannot stop living, 257
assessment (L IX) to detect reasons for, 1
copying or picturing incidents and then getting
being high, there are exact reasons for, 25
stuck in later portion of them, 286, 380
can come from by-passed flows, 286, 380
could be called a "mystery sandwich" in that he
commonest sources of, 24
tends to stick in on mysteries, 237 C/S
53, 228, 282, 308, 356, 398
creates mest to have a game, 112 if
C/S 53 done and TA still high, 1
cuts down knowingness to create a game, 112
handling, 25, 287, 381
degradation begins when thetan is interiorized into
pc goes exterior in auditing, later his TA goes
unwanted mass, 105 high, then
you do an Int RD, 280
efforts to be right continue to stop him in a reverse
Quad Flows and high TA, 381
flow, 257 source of high TA, 24, 286, 380
energy reducing processes at length "starve" thetan
talking the TA down, 25
for energy, 105 Triple Flows and high TA,
287
gets in trouble by being only one viewpoint, 116 Hi-Lo
TA Assessment (C/S 53), 228, 282, 308,
has to be at earliest end of incidents to erase them,
356, 398
286, 381 low TAs, 26
is incident hungry, 286, 381 answer to low TA
because of wet hands is foot
life in body, thetan puts it there, 126
plates, 27
mass, loss of, 105 commonest sources of, 24,
27
massy thetans, 286, 380 don't get pc to wipe
hands every minute, 27
relation to energy, 105 false, overly wet
condition of hands or feet pro
right, thetan even when pressed or suppressed to
duces, 226, 415
absolute limit of near extinction will still try,
L IX Hi-Lo TA List revised, 1
even when "cooperating", to some way be
overruns are demonstrated by a rising TA, 290,
right, 257 385
viewpoint scarcity of thetan, remedy of, 116 Product
Clearing and TA, 49
third dynamic; see dynamic, 3rd talking the TA down, 25
tone arm (TA), Word Clearing, high or low TA at start of
W/C ses
auditor calling pc's attention to, handling of, 410,
sion, how to handle, 304
414 Word Clearing red tab with high or low TA,
303
conditions that make an auditor mess up a pc's Word
Clearing, TA must be in normal range to
TA, 227, 416 start Word Clearing on
meter, 303, 304
depends on normally moist hands, 226, 415 Touch Assist,
191
false TA, 24, 26, 34, 226, 414 don't confine handling
of injuries to, 190
auditing pc over false TA, handling of, 409 training;
see also course; drills; student; TRs
auditor not getting false TA handled before
duplicationand training, 110
session, handling of, 411 education
mustn't skip gradients, 171
auditor overrunning due to false TA, handling
fast flow training, 162
of, 411 part-time study on next level
while auditing is a
checklist, 34, 417 failure, 15
dry and wet hands make false TA, 226, 415
Scientology training gives more fundamentals than
E-Meter trim knob thrown off gives false TA,
exist in all other subjects combined, 202
24 sending auditors to upper orgs for
training, 13
F/N wide persistent with TA too high or low skill
and training of a Class VIII auditor, 391
means false TA, 227, 416 staff auditors,
12
footplates generally give a wrong TA position,
value of training; see also Dianetics Today
414 training drills or routines; see TRs
hand cream and false TA, 226, 414 tranquilizer,
Cal-Mag replaces any, 355
handling of, 41 1, 414 transfer, tendency to, how
to handle, 50
high TA caused by dry hands, remedy of, Treason,
out-ethics people go rapidly into, 101
226, 415 Treble Assessments, AEI, intentions
in, 277
low TA, dry condition of hands or feet pro- trim, E-
Meter trim knob thrown off gives false TA, 24
duces, 226, 415 Triple Flows; see Dianetics, Full
Flow; flows
must be handled before session, 414 Trouble Area
Assessment, 83
vanishing cream, why one doesn't use, 414 Trouble
Area Short Form, 84
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
troubled/worried, PTS RD step, 342 understand, understanding,
understood,
TRs, defn, to have a clear and true idea or
conception,
Anti-Q and A TR, 221 or full and exact
knowledge, of something; in
cramming order, every cramming order includes ~,
general it may be said that understand refers to
164 result of a mental process or
processes (a clear
C/S trouble comes from factors of, 292, 386 and
exact idea or notion, or full knowledge);
gradients in TRs, 186 understand implies power to
receive and regis
honest TRs, 33 ter a clear and true impression,
317
LRH Model Auditing Tapes are models of correct
cleared word is a word which has been cleared to
use of, 33 point of full conceptual
understanding, 317
Mutter TR, ~purpose, commands, position and
communicationand, 185
training stress of, 395 superliterate,
when one is superliterate one reads
overwhelming TRs is commonest reason for low not
words but understandings, and so one can
TAs, 27 act, 316
reason for TRs, 289, 383 underweight or debility, defn.,
inadequate or lacking
result of poor TRs, 33 foods, substances or gases
which are needed for
TR 0, activity, maintenance or repair of body, 402
"auditors mustn't do TR 0 in Cramming as it
unhappiness, relation to reduced energy (havingness),
stirs up their cases" is a complete lie, 194
105
blinkless TR 0, there is no such thing, 369
unproductive, basic Why for being, 130
exists so an auditor is not ducking session but unrun
flows; see flows, unrun
can sit there relaxed, doing his job, 289, 383
upset pc, handling of, 179
going over and over TR 04,186 upsets and missed
withholds, 178
OT TR0 and TR0 are a routine action for upstats,
when you reward a downstat you not only
auditors, 164 deprive ~, you also cave
the downstat in, 80
TR 1 ,
Case Supervisor gets auditor's TR 1 corrected,
233 V
must be done so pc can hear and understand
auditor (without blowing pc's head off valence,
person whose ethics have been out over a
either), 289, 383 - long period
goes "out of valence", 101
TR 2 valences, all valences are circuits are valences,
181
must be done so that pc gets acknowledged, valence
shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS
289, 383 RDs, 331, 339
note on TR 2 and TR 4, 395 vanishing cream,
unsuitable as solution to dry hands,
TR 3 basically exists so that auditor will continue
414
to give pc commands and not squirrel off or
verbal tech explanations, result of, 424
packupwithtotalsilence,289,383 virus, effect of
most antibiotics on virus is zero,
TR 4; see also originations 403
exists so that pc's origins are accepted and vital
information, 327, 336
not Qed and Aed with or invalidated, 289,
auditor not writing down ~ in worksheets, hand
383 ling of, 412
how to do, 183,184 dramatization of withholds
on vital information
note on TR 2 and TR 4, 395 lines, 336
three steps in handling an origin, 183 Vital
Information Rundown, 328, 337
truth, Expanded Dianetics OCA right-hand side
handling,
actual barrier in society is failure to practice truth,
Vital Info RD belongs on, 328
203 vitamins, antibiotics and, 405, 407, 408
datum and truth, 114
road to truth is begun with honesty, 150
sanity is basically honesty and truth, 31
W
Scientology is road to truth and he who would
follow it must take true steps, 203 Wants
Handled Rundown, 277
two-way comm; see communication, two-way Waterloo Station
[process], difficulties with, due to
pc inability to remedy
havingness, 125
W/C; see Word Clearing
welfare states, why they get lots of
criminals, 79
U W/H; see withhold
what is a course-High Crime, 41
underrun, cause of overrun and, 273 whole track recall;
see Mission Into Time
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Why(s), word(s) (cont.)
administrative Whys, below, there is usually an
Primary Rundown, student looks up every , 75
Ethics situation, 100 superliterate, when one is,
one reads not words
evaluation, long times to do, handling of, 145
but understandings, and so one can act, 316
finding W/Ses must go into pc folder, 96, 303 Word
Clearing; see also misunderstood
found, correction of, suspect listing errors, 96 case
trouble and Word Clearing, 304
self-listing for, 96 chain of words, all must F/N, 303
"Whys have been found" but person is not doing
correction, 96
well; this is case of vrong items, 157 errors,
304
win, how to end session when pc exteriorizes on a are
red tabbed, 304
good win, 397, 410 commonest is failure
to use correction lists, 67
win, pc being made to go on past a win acts as invali-
correction is done by Word Clearing Correction
dation, 194 List, 96, 304
withdrawal symptoms of drugs, how to handle, 354; F/N,
always F/N a word being cleared on meter,
see also drugs 303, 304
withhold(s), withholding, Grammar Course before Word
Clearing, 143
continuous missed withhold, 235 grammatical words and
small words should be
dramatization of withholds, 336 looked up in a
simple grammar textbook, 143
evil purpose, individual with, has to ~ himself lists
forprepared lists, 366
because he may do destructive things, 127
Method 1 ,
false reads on ~ and asking for some ~ more than
comes first, 10
once will ARC break pc, 409 done by normal
Word Clearing procedures in
general, handling general withholds and other
HGC, 76
people's withholds, 176 drug case who
cannot be gotten through, how
Havingness must be run to get the benefit of
to handle, 137,163
having pulled ~,181 end phenomena, 76, 132
"irresponsible pc", how to get ~ off, 176
procedure, 132
keep session from occurring, 178 Method 1, 2 or 4,
don't use on person whose TA is
level below withholding, some pcs "have no with-
high at session start, 303
holds" and "have done nothing", 371 Method 2,
don't do before Method 1,10
missed and partial, 178 Method 2 EP, 10
out-ethics ~, people with, cannot see, 101 can
be many times repeated on different sub
overts are biggest reason why person restrains him-
jects or branches of subjects, 10
self and withholds self from action, 370
protest reads, 10
pc giving another's, 176 Method 3, use of, 10
perception decreases in proportion to number of,
Method 4, 28, 301
128 books, Method 4 of, 166, 305
PTS person is withholding himself, 129 break down
the materials when doing, 166
pulling, "don't know" version of, 176 E-Meter
Drill 21 to be drilled for use on, 28,
pulling, use of steering, 180 301
savage justice aberrates because it prevents getting
errors in Word Clearing Method 4,166
off withholds, 172 limitations, 152
symptoms of students who are withholding, 173
Method 1 is not a prerequisite, 28, 301
vital information, 327, 328 misunderstood word,
use M4 when fishing for,
"withhold of nothingness", students who are inter-
301
rupted too often when F/Ning may blow on a
Primary Rundown, use of, 77
~,193 procedure,28,301
word(s), questions to use, 75, 77, 305
auditor must clear each and every word of every
requires no C/S OK for it to be done, 28, 301
command or list used, 93, 94
Supervisor's use of, 29, 302
classes, 167 tapes, Method 4 of, 166, 305
clearedwords,defn.,317 too heavy on pc or doesn't
clean up, suspect
glib student can confront words but cannot apply,
implants, 96
99 Method 5, Material Clearing, 152
grammar is a systematic description of the ways in
Method 6, Key Word Clearing, 153
which words are used in a particular language,
post trouble remedied by, 153
167 Method 7, Reading Aloud, 154
meanings are embodied in basic concept or idea
Method 8,155
symbolized by that word, 316 used in
the Primary Rundown, 155
misunderstood; see misunderstood word OCAs, word
clearing OCAs is forbidden, 30
SUBJECT INDEX-1972/1975
Word Clearing (cont.)
Primary Rundown consists of ~ and study tech,
X
135
red tabs, 303 XDn; see Expanded Dianetics
TA trouble at start of , handling of, 303, 304
tests at any time is a High Crime, 32
Y
worksheet must show truthfully all words F/Ned,
303 yellow, Case Supervisor must put a yellow tab
worksheets must be placed in folders, 303, 304
marked PTS on a PTS pc folder, 92
work and illiteracy, 170
worksheet(s) (W/S); see also Auditor Admin Series
Z
[IX-1]
C/S not reading ~ or missing corny errors and not Zero Flow;
see Flow 0
correcting auditor, handling of, 413
illegible worksheets, handling of, 412
Numerals
Why finding ~ must go into pc folder, 96, 303
Word Clearing worksheet must show truthfully all 3 May PL,
Danger Rundown, 100
words F/Ned, 303 VA pcs, PTS Rundown, L&N for places
and planets,
Word Clearing worksheets must go into pc's folder,
how to do, 142
96, 303, 304
ALPHABETICAL LIST OF TITLES
Anti-biotics, Administering of 403 Dianetics 289
Anti-Q and A TR-Reissued from 21st Dianetics and Ext RD
Repair List-L3RC 245
Advanced Clinical Course Training Dianetics and Int RD
Repair List-L3RD 265
Drills 221 Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary
423
Art, More About 196 Dianetics-R3R Commands Have Background
Assists Vol.VII-322 Data 243
Assists-A Flag Expertise Subject Vol.VII-335 Dianetics Today
396
Assists in Scientology Vol.VII-415 Diet, Theory of a Natural Diet
401
Assist Summary 189 Dinky Dictionaries 151
Assist Summary Addition 237 Distractive and Additive Questions
and Orders 160
Auditing Folders, Omissions in Completeness 452 "Dog Pcs" 147
Auditing Reports, Falsifying of, 450 Dramatization of Withholds on
Vital
Auditor Correction List-Auditor Recovery 60 Information
Lines, The 336
Auditor's Code, The Vol.VI-269 Drug Data Vol.VI-244
Auditor's Rights Modified 149 Drugs & Trippers Vol.VI-258
Auditor's Worksheets Vol.VII-433 Drugs, More About 354
Axiom 28 Amended 185 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA 226, 415
Barriers to Study Vol.VII-293 Effectiveness of Overts in
Processing 370
Basic Processes, The-Case Supervisor- E-Meters-Sensitivity
Errors 271
Class VIII Vol.VI-278 End Phenomena 272
Bypassed Charge 144 End Phenomenas Vol.VII-451
Case Supervisor-Class VIII-The Basic Establishment Of ~icer
Serles Lectures 36
Processes Vol.VI-278 Ethics 78
Catastrophes From and Repair of "No Interest" Ethics and
Executives 100
Items 169 Expanded Dianetics Developments Since the
CCHs 5, 6 & 7 Vol.VII-408 Original Lectures 276
Change Brackets and Commands Vol.IV-258 Expanded DianeticsLectures 67
Clear to F/N 303 Expanded Dianetics Repair List-
Code of a Scientologist OEC Vol. 0-25 L3 EXD RB 70
Communication Cycle in Expanded Dianetics Requisites 297, 372
Auditing, The Vol.VII-248 Expanded Dianetics Series 1
68, 87
Communication Cycles Within the Expanded GF 40 RB Vol.VII-
304
Auditing Cycle Vol.VII-244 Expanded Gita 120
Confront 182 Ext and Ending Session 397
Confronting Vol.VII-264 Exteriorization Vol.VII-420
Continuous Missed W/H and Continuous Overt "Failed" Cases
426
with Data on Degraded Beings and False PTS False TA
Addition Vol.VII-438
Conditions, The 235 False TA Addition 2 24
Continuous PT Overts Vol.VI-260 False TA Addition 3 26
Correct Danger Condition Handling 82 False TA Checklist 34, 417
Course Supervisor Correction List-Study Corr Fast Flow Training
162
List 2R 52 Fear of People List-R 219
Course Translation to Tape Vol.VII-441 Fixed Attention-
Introspection RD-Second
Cramming 188 Addition-Information to C/Ses 262
Cramming Over Out Ruds 334 Flubless C/Sing 164
C/Ses and Overload-Reduction of Refunds 318 F/N and Erasure Vol.VII-
117
C/Sing a PTS Rundown 91 F/N Everything Vol.VII-196
C/Sing Checklist 11 F/N What You Ask or Program 222
Cure of Q and A, The-Man's Deadliest Former Therapy-Resistive
Cases Vol.VII-449
Disease 223 Full Product Clearing Long Form 44
Current State of the Subject and Materials- Generalities Won't
Do 176
Scientology 201 Glib Student, The 99
Delivery Repair Lists 445 Grammar 143
Dianetic HCO B-Interest 161 Grammar Definition 167
Gradients in TRs 186 Mutual Out Ruds 259
Green Form 321 New Grade Chart 311
Green Form S & D Vol.VI-250 Notes on Blinking-TR 0 369
Handling Flubbed Pcs 320 Nulling and F/Ning Prepared Lists
213
Handling Originations-Step Four 183 Objective Rundown, An 393
HAS Specialist and Establishment Officer Objectives-An
Early Release see-393
Auditing Program 50 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Vol.VII-148
Havingness (3 May 72) 105 Old Lists Are Not To Be Copied
Vol.VI-256
Havingness (17 Dec. 72) 181 Orders and Products-Production
and
HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists RA Vol.VII-132 Establishment
37
Help the Pc 180 OrganizationExecutiveCourseand Management
Honest TRs see-33 Series 269
How to Get Results In an HGC Vol.VII-365 Out Basics and How to Get
Them In 409
Hymn of Asia 390 Out-Point Plus-Point Lists RA, HC Vol.VII-132
Illiteracy and Work 170 Overt-Motivator Sequence Vol.VI-231
Importance of Havingness, The 123 Overts-Order of Effectiveness
in
Integrity Processing Questions Processing see-370
Must Be F/Ned 175 Past Life Remedies 388
Interest-Dianetic HCO B 161 Pc Application Form for Any Major
Interiorization Errors Vol.VII-456 Auditing Action Vol.VII-
16
Interiorization Summary 279 Pc Completions-Second Revision
214
Introspection RD-Additional Actions 260 Pep 207
Introspection RD-Second Addition- Post Purpose Clearing 363
Information to C/Ses-Fixated Attention 262 Preclear Declare?
Procedure 218
Introspection RD-The Technical PreOTs Don't C/S 85
Breakthrough of 1973! 239, 249, 346 Primary Correction
Rundown-First
IntrospectionRD-Third Addition-Additional Cramming
Correction 65
Introspection RD Steps 295 Primary Correction Rundown Handling
157
Int Rundown Correction List-Revised Vol.VII-429 Primary
Correction Rundown Revised, The 133
Johannesburg Confessional List-Revised 419 Primary Failure, The
233
Johannesburg Security Check- Primary Rundown 135
Revised see footnote-422 Primary Rundown Note 75
Keeping Scientology Working Vol.VI- 4 Production and Establishment-
Orders and
Length of Time to Evaluate 145 Products 37
Lists Vol.VI-263 Product Purpose and Why and WC Error
LRH Model Tape Sessions 33 Correction 96
L3 EXD RB-Expanded Dianetics PTS Handling 209
Repair List 70 PTS Interviews 98
L3RC-Dianetics and Ext RD Repair List 245 PTS RD Addition 19
L3RD-Dianetics and Int RD Repair List 265 PTS RD Correction List 89
L4BR-For Assessment of All Listing Errors 138 PTS Rundown
330, 338, 429
L IX Hi-Lo TA List Revised 1 PTS Rundown and Vital Info RD
Position
L10 Prerequisites 392 Corrected 428
Magic of the Communication Cycle, PTS Rundown, Final Step
141
The Vol.VII-238 Purpose of Class VIII, The 391
Man's Deadliest Disease-The Cure of Quadruple Dianetics-
Dangers of 383
Q and A 223 Quads Cancelled Vol.VII-324
Meter Use in Qual 397 Quads Reinstated 373
Method 1-Standard C/S for Word Clearing in "Quickie" Defined
93
Session 131 Reason for Q and A, The 230
Method 4 Notes 166, 305 Recognition of Rightness of the
Method 5 152 Being Vol.VII-257
Method 6 153 Recovering Students and Pcs 193
Method 7 154 Reduction of Refunds-C/Ses and Overload 318
Method 8 155 Reissued from 21st Advanced Clinical Course
Mission Into Time 212 Training Drills-Anti-Q and A TR
221
Mutter TR 395 Remedy of Havingness, The 112
Remedy of Havingness-The Process 115 Teaching a Tape Course
Vol.VII-446
Resistive Cases-Former Therapy Vol.VII-449 Teaching the Class
VIII Vol.VI-276
Re: Study Series 5 see footnote-67 Tech Div Primary Rundown 76
Rhythm 298 Technical Breakthrough of 1973!, The-
Robotism 127 The Introspection RD 239, 249, 346
Rock Slams and Rock Slammers 344 Technical Breakthrough of 1974-
R/Ses, What They Mean 440 The Vital Information Rundown
327, 436
R3R Commands Have Background Data- Technical Queries
424
Dianetics 243 Theory of a Natural Diet 401
R6EW-OT III No Interference Area 20 Thirty-Six New Presessions
Vol.IV-156
S & D, Green Form Vol.VI-250 Three Important Communication
Scales Vol. VI-200 Lines, The Vol.VII-243
Scientology, Current State of the Subject and Tone Scale in
Full Vol.VII-404
Material 201 Touch Assists-Correct Ones Vol.IX-502
Security of Data Vol.VI-105 Training and CCH Processes Vol.III-
61
Sensitivity Errors-E-Meters 271 Training and Interning Staff
Auditors 12
Service Facsimile Theory and Expanded Triple and Quad Reruns
380
Dianetics 257 Triple Reruns 286
Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S TR 0-Notes on Blinking
369
228, 282, 308, 356, 398 TWC Checksheets-TWC, Using
Wrong
Six Basic Processes 107 Questions 270
Six Zones of Action Vol.VI-252 Two Parts of Auditing, The Vol.VII-
240
Stage Manners 293 Unhandled Drugs and Ethics 300
Standard C/S for Word Clearing in Session- Use of Dianetics (4
Apr. 71RA) 274
Method 1 131 Use of Dianetics (7 Mar. 71RA) 284
Step Four-Handling Orginations 183 Use of Quad Dianetics 377
Student Rehabilitation List 359 Use of Quadruple Dianetics 374
Student Rescue Intensive Vol.VI-451 Vanishing Cream and False TA
414
Students Who Succeed 172 Vital Info RD Position Corrected, PTS
Study Correction List 16 Rundown and 428
Study Corr List 2R-Course Supervisor Vital Information
Rundown, The-
Correction List 52 The Technical Breakthrough of 1974
327, 436
Summary of How to Write an Auditor's Report WCI Comes First 10
and Worksheets for HQS Co-Audit Vol.VII-215 What is a
Course? Vol.VII-198
Super-literacy see-314 What is a Course-High Crime 41
Super-literacy and the Cleared Word 314 Withholds, Missed and
Partial 178
Supervisor Two-Way Comm and the Word Clearing Errors 304
Misunderstood Word Vol.VII-299 Word Clearing Lists for
Prepared Lists 366
Supervisor Two-Way Comm Explained Vol.VII-302 Word Clearing
Method 4 28, 301
Suppressed Pcs and PTS Tech 95 Word Clearing OCAs 30
Talking the TA Down Modified 25 Word Clearing Series 15R 32
Tapes, How to Use Vol.VII-434 XDN Case B 307
VIII Actions Vol.VII-100