No matching fragments found in this document.
The
Technical Bulletins
of
Dianetics and Scientology
by
L. Ron Hubbard
FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
Volume
XII
1978-1979
_____________________________________________________________________
I will not always be here on guard.
The stars twinkle in the Milky Way
And the wind sighs for songs
Across the empty fields of a planet
A Galaxy away.
You won't always be here.
But before you go,
Whisper this to your sons
And their sons -
"The work was free.
Keep it so. "
L. RON HUBBARD
[pic]
L. Ron Hubbard
Founder of Dianetics and Scientology
EDITOR'S NOTE
This is Volume XII of The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology
by L. Ron Hubbard. It contains the many fantastic technical breakthroughs
achieved by Ron during the latter part of 1978 up to the end of 1979,
carrying on directly from where Volume XI ends.
As in other Technical Volumes, if an issue has been revised, replaced, or
canceled, this has been indicated in the upper right-hand corner along with
the date of the issue which should be referred to.
The Chronological Contents shows at what point on the time track each issue
in this volume was released, and the Long Contents gives you a breakdown of
the subject content of each separate HCOB or issue.
In the Subject Index at the back of this volume. main entries appear in
boldface type to make it easy to find any subject.
If the title of a bulletin is known but not the date of issue, the
Alphabetical List of Titles may be consulted to locate the issue fast.
Lastly, the Cancellations and Revisions lists show you which issues in
previous Technical Volumes have been canceled or revised by issues
presented in Volume XII.
The Editor
TECHNICAL BULLETINS
1978-1979
CONTENTS
1961
8 June R E-Meter Watching (revised 22 Feb. 1979) 1
1965
16 Nov. R E-Meter Sensitivity Setting 4
(revised 22 Feb. 1979)
1966
10 Feb. R Tech Recovery (HCO PL) (revised 22 Feb. 1979) 5
11 Feb. R Free Needles, How to Get Them on a Pc
(revised 22 Feb . 1979) 9
1967
12 Feb. The Responsibilities of Leaders
(corrected and reissued 4 Sept. 1979) 11
1969
19 May RB Drug and Alcohol Cases-Prior Assessing
(re-revised 14 Nov. 1978) 22
16 Aug. R Handling Illness in Scientology
(revised 25 Sept. 1978) 24
1970
7 Apr. RB Green Form (HCO PL) (revised 8 Dec. 1978) 27
11 Apr. R Auditing Past Exterior (Int. RD. Series 6)
(revised 23 Sept. 1978) 32
6 May R Blows-Auditing Past Exterior (Int. RD. Series 7)
(revised 24 Sept. 1978) 34
27 May R Unreading Questions and Items (revised 3 Dec. 1978)
36
30 May R Interiorization Intensive-2-Way Comm (Int. RD.
Series 3)
(revised 23 Sept. 1978) 38
20 Aug. R Interiorization Rundown Musts (Int. RD. Series 8)
(revised 23 Sept. 1978) 40
1971
4 Jan. R Exteriorization and High TA-The Interiorization
Rundown
Revised (Int. RD. Series 2) (revised 24 Sept. 1978)
43
1971 (cont.)
13 Jan. R Exteriorization (Int. RD. Series 9)
(revised 24 Sept. 1978) 51
7 Mar. R Use of Quadruple Dianetics (C/S Series 28RA-1RA)
(revised 12 Dec. 1978) 53
15 Mar. R Data Series Auditing (HCO PL) (Data Series 21R)
(revised 6 Jan. 1979) 56
4 Apr. R Use of Quad Dianetics (C/S Series 32RA-1RC)
(revised 12 Dec. 1978) 57
30 June RB Expanded Green Form 40RD-EXGF 40RD
(revised 4 Dec. 1978) 60
3 July R Auditing by Lists (revised 22 Feb. 1979) 70
15 July RC Drug Handling (C/S Series 48RD) (NED Series 9RB)
(re-revised 31 Jan . 1979) 73
24 Sept. R Interiorization Rundown-Correction Drill: Date to
Blow/
Locate to Blow (Int. RD. Series 11) (revised 24 Sept.
1978) 79
29 Oct. RA Int Rundown Correction List Revised (Int. RD. Series
12)
(re-revised 24 Sept. 1978) 84
9 Dec. RC PTS Rundown, Audited (re-revised 8 Dec. 1978)
90
16 Dec. RB Interiorization Errors (C/S Series 35RB, Int. RD.
Series 10)
(re-revised 24 Sept. 1978) 98
17 Dec. RB Interiorization Summary (Int. RD. Series 15,
C/S Series 23RB) (re-revised 24 Sept. 1978) 102
1972
1 Jan. RB LIX Hi-Lo TA List Revised (revised 10 Feb. 1977)
107
20 Jan. R PTS RD Addition (revised 8 Dec. 1978) 124
3 June RA PTS Rundown, Final Step (re-revised 8 Dec. 1978)
126
1973
30 Jan. RC Method 9 Word Clearing the Right Way
(W/C Series 46RC) (revised 19 Dec. 1979) 128
7 Apr. RA Gradients in TRs (revised 22 Feb. 1979) 142
15 Oct. RB Nulling and F/Ning Prepared Lists (C/S Series 87RB)
(re-revised 4 Dec. t978) 144
24 Nov. RD Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53RL SF)
(revised 30 Oct. 1978) 147
24 Nov. RE C/S Series 53RL LF (Long Form) (revised 30 Oct.
1978) 150
1974
18 Mar. R E-Meters-Sensitivity Errors (revised 22 Feb. 1979)
154
1975
29 Mar. R Antibiotics, Administering of (revised 23 Oct. 1978)
156
1977
14 June -1 Paid Comps Simplified-Addition I
-C/S Series 81RA-Auditor's Rights Modified-Addition I
(addition of 12 June 1979) 162
1978
6 Feb. RA The Purification Rundown Replaces the Sweat Program
(re-revised 4 Dec. 1979) 163
6 Feb.RA-1 The Purification Rundown-Errata and Additions
(addition of 20 Dec. 1979) 180
23 Mar. RA Clearing Words (W/C Series 59RA)
(revised 14 Dec. 1979) 182
19 Sept. R The End of Endless Drug RDs (revised 31 Jan. 1979)
185
19 Sept. R The End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List
(revised 31 Jan. 1979) 187
24 Sept. RA The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown (Int. RD.
Series 4RA)
(revised 21 Feb. 1979) 189
24 Sept. Preassessment, AESPs and Int (Int. RD. Series 13)
199
24 Sept. Dianetic Clear 200
25 Sept. Quad Commands for Int Buttons (Int. RD. Series 5)
201
25 Sept. Starrate Checkouts for Interiorization Rundown
(Int. RD. Series 14) 206
29 Sept. FESing of Folders and Full Flow Tables 209
3 Oct. NED Rule 210
4 Oct. Interiorization Handling Simplified (Int. RD. Series 1)
211
16 Oct. Repair Correction List 214
16 Oct. C/S Checklist of Int Errors (Int. RD. Series 16,
C/S Series 102) 217
30 Oct. C/S Series 53, Use of 220
30 Oct. Courses-Their Ideal Scene 223
10 Nov. R Proclamation-Power to Forgive (revised 3 Dec. 1978)
225
10 Nov. R-1 Proclamation: Power to Forgive Addition
(addition of 26 Nov. 1978) 227
15 Nov. Dating and Locating 228
19 Nov. L & N Lists-The Item "Me" 237
27 Nov. Word Clearing Correction List (W/C Series 35RF) 238
28 Nov. Auditors Who Miss Withholds, Penalty 242
29 Nov. Dianetic Clear Attests (C/S Series 104) 243
30 Nov. Confessional Procedure 245
Dec. What Is Scientology? 251
1 Dec. Programming the Dianetic Clear for His Next Step 252
3 Dec. Unreading Flows 253
4 Dec. How to Read through an F/N 254
5 Dec. Dianetic Clear Attests-Additional Data (C/S Series 105)
256
6 Dec. Revivification 259
1978 (cont.)
7 Dec. HCOB 1 October 1978, HCOB 6 October 1978 on
Bright Think Rundown Withdrawn 260
8 Dec. Green Form and Expanded Green Form 40RDs Use of 261
9 Dec. HCO PL 23 Oct. 76 and BPL 29 Nov. 1976 Canceled
(HCO PL) 263
13 Dec. R Pc Set-Ups and C/S 53 (revised 24 Sept. 1979)
264
17 Dec. Ron's Journal 30-1978-The Year of Lightning Fast
New Tech (LRH ED 301 INT) 265
29 Dec. The Suppressed Person Rundown 276
30 Dec. R Suppressed Person Rundown Problems Processes
(revised 6 Jan. 1979) 279
31 Dec. Outline of PTS Handling 290
31 Dec. Educating the Potential Trouble Source, the First Step
Toward Handling: PTS C/S-1 293
1979
6 Jan. HCOB 24 July 1970 and HCOB 28 August 1970RA
Canceled (canceled-see HCOB 28 Aug. 1970RB Vol. XIII)
300
6 Jan. Correction to Ron's Journal 30-Requirements for
Super Power Auditors (LRH ED 301-1 INT) 301
9 Jan. BTB Cancellation 302
17 Jan. A New Type of Crime (HCO PL) 303
19 Jan. Cancellation (HCO PL) (Data Series 47) 304
28 Jan. C/S Qualifications 304
31 Jan. Mood Drills 305
3 Feb. Change the Civilization Eval (corrected and reissued
8 Feb. 1979) 307
3 Feb. Confront Tech Has to Be Part of the TR Checksheet 311
7 Feb. R E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze (revised 15 Feb. 1979)
312
9 Feb. How to Defeat Verbal Tech 317
15 Feb. Verbal Tech: Penalties 318
21 Feb. E-Meter Essentials Errata Sheet (HCO PL)
(corrected and reissued 6 May 1979) 319
22 Feb. Errata-P.A.B. No. 147 (HCO PL) 324
Mar. Group Auditor's Handbook 325
4 Mar. R Art in Its Basics (Art Series 6)
(revised 30 Dec. 1979) 326
5 Mar. R Dianetic Clear False Declares (revised 6 Mar. 1979)
328
26 Mar. RB Misunderstood Words and Cycles of Action (Esto
Series
35RB, W/C Series 60RB, Product Debug Series 7R)
(revised 2 Sept. 1979) 329
15 Apr. Fine Arts versus Illustrations (Art Series 7)
331
30 Apr. Auditing the Dianetic Clear (C/S Series 106) 332
1979 (cont.)
2 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive 333
2 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List 339
3 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive-C/S and Auditor
Requirements 344
10 June A Professional (Art Series 8) 346
17 June Crashing Mis-Us: The Key to Completed Cycles of Action;
and Products (W/C Series 61, Product Debug Series 3)
347
18 June The Crashing Mis-U Repair List-LC1
(Product Debug Series 4, W/C Series 62) 357
7 July Crashing Mis-U Definition 360
16 July The "Elusive" Mis-U or Crashing Mis-U
(Product Debug Series 5, W/C Series 63) 361
17 July The Misunderstood Word Defined (W/C Series 64) 363
7 Aug. False Data Stripping (Product Debug Series 8,
Esto Series 36) 367
19 Aug. High Crime-Addition-High Crime Checkouts and
Word Clearing 375
21 Aug. Twinning 377
23 Aug. Crashing Mu's Blocks to Finding Them
(W/C Series 659 Product Debug Series 6) 386
23 Aug. Product Debug Repair List (Product Debug Series 10)
391
23 Aug. Debug Tech (HCO PL) (Product Debug Series 1,
Esto Series 37) 400
23 Aug. Debug Tech Checklist (HCO PL) (Esto Series 389
Product Debug Series 2) 408
23 Sept. Cancellation of Destructive BTBs and BPLs on TRs
417
24 Sept. Flying Ruds in Cramming (Cramming Series 19) 421
13 Oct. Conceptual Understanding (W/C Series 66) 425
29 Oct. SSO Responsibility for Standard Staff Courses (HCO PL)
426
21 Dec. Auditor Assignment Policies, Cramming Assignment
Policies (C/S Series 107, Cramming Series 20, Qual
Corrective Actions on OTs Series 1) 431
24 Dec. TRs Basics Resurrected 433
30 Dec. How to Build a Sauna 439
Subject Index 449
Alphabetical List of Titles 507
Cancellations and Revisions 509
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
The Chronological Contents is a full contents list showing the
chronology of the issues in this volume. It lists the issues under the date
when each was last revised or reissued. If the issue has never been revised
or reissued then it is simply listed under its original issue date. Persons
who wish to study the HCOBs in chronological sequence will find the
Chronological Contents especially useful.
1977
10 Feb. LIX Hi-Lo TA List Revised (revision of HCOB I Jan. 1972)
107
1978
23 Sept. Auditing Past Exterior (Int. RD. Series 6)
(revision of HCOB 11 Apr. 1970) 32
23 Sept. Interiorization Intensive-2-Way Comm (Int. RD. Series 3)
(revision of HCOB 30 May 1970) 38
23 Sept. Interiorization Rundown Musts (Int. RD. Series 8)
(revision of HCOB 20 Aug. 1970) 40
24 Sept. Blows-Auditing Past Exterior (Int. RD. Series 7)
(revision of HCOB 6 May 1970) 34
24 Sept. Exteriorization and High TA-The Interiorization
Rundown Revised (Int. RD. Series 2)
(revision of HCOB 4 Jan. 1971) 43
24 Sept. Exteriorization (Int. RD. Series 9)
(revision of HCOB 13 Jan. 1971) 51
24 Sept. Interiorization Rundown-Correction Drill: Date to Blow/
Locate to Blow (Int. RD. Series 11) (revision of HCOB
24 Sept. 1971) 79
24 Sept. Int Rundown Correction List Revised (Int. RD. Series 12)
(re-revision of HCOB 29 Oct. 1971) 84
24 Sept. Interiorization Errors (C/S Series 35RB, Int. RD.
Series 10) (re-revision of HCOB 16 Dec. 1971) 98
24 Sept. Interiorization Summary (Int. RD. Series 15,
C/S Series 23RB) (re-revision of HCOB 17 Dec. 1971) 102
24 Sept. Preassessment, AESPs and Int (Int. RD. Series 13) 199
24 Sept. Dianetic Clear 200
25 Sept. Handling Illness in Scientology (revision of HCOB
16 Aug. 1969) 24
25 Sept. Quad Commands for Int Buttons (Int. RD. Series 5) 201
25 Sept. Starrate Checkouts for Interiorization Rundown
(Int. RD. Series 14) 206
29 Sept. FESing of Folders and Full Flow Tables 209
3 Oct. NED Rule 210
4 Oct. Interiorization Handling Simplified (Int. RD. Series 1)
211
16 Oct. Repair Correction List 214
16 Oct. C/S Checklist of Int Errors (Int. RD. Series 16,
C/S Series 102) 217
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
23 Oct. Antibiotics, Administering of (revision of HCOB
29 Mar. 1975) 156
30 Oct. Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S (C/S Series 53RL SF)
(revision of HCOB 24 Nov. 1973) 147
30 Oct. C/S Series 53RL LF (Long Form) (revision of HCOB
24 Nov. 1973) 150
30 Oct. C/S Series 53, Use of 220
30 Oct. Courses-Their Ideal Scene 223
15 Nov. Dating and Locating 228
19 Nov. L & N Lists-The Item "Me" 237
26 Nov. Proclamation: Power to Forgive Addition
(addition to HCOB 10 Nov. 1978R) 227
27 Nov. Word Clearing Correction List (W/C Series 35RF) 238
28 Nov. Auditors Who Miss Withholds, Penalty 242
29 Nov. Dianetic Clear Attests (C/S Series 104) 243
30 Nov. Confessional Procedure 245
Dec. What Is Scientology? 251
1 Dec. Programming the Dianetic Clear for His Next Step 252
3 Dec. Unreading Questions and Items (revision of HCOB
27 May 1970) 36
3 Dec. Proclamation-Power to Forgive (revision of HCOB
10 Nov. 1978) 225
3 Dec. Unreading Flows 253
4 Dec. Expanded Green Form 40RD-EXGF 40RD (revision of
HCOB 30 June 1971) 60
4 Dec. Nulling and F/Ning Prepared Lists (C/S Series 87RB)
(re-revision of HCOB 15 Oct. 1973) 144
4 Dec. How to Read through an F/N 254
5 Dec. Dianetic Clear Attests-Additional Data (C/S Series 105)
256
6 Dec. Revivification 259
7 Dec. HCOB 1 October 1978, HCOB 6 October 1978 on
Bright Think Rundown Withdrawn 260
8 Dec. Green Form (HCO PL) (revision of HCO PL 7 Apr. 1970)
27
8 Dec. PTS Rundown, Audited (re-revision of HCOB 9 Dec. 1971)
90
8 Dec. PTS RD Addition (revision of HCOB 20 Jan. 1972) 124
8 Dec. PTS Rundown, Final Step (re-revision of HCOB 3 June 1972)
126
8 Dec. Green Form and Expanded Green Form 40RD, Use of 261
9 Dec. HCO PL 23 Oct. 76 and BPL 29 Nov. 1976 Canceled
(HCO PL) 263
12 Dec. Use of Quadruple Dianetics (C/S Series 28RA-1RA)
(revision of HCOB 7 Mar. 1971) 53
12 Dec. Use of Quad Dianetics (C/S Series 32RA-1RC)
(revision of HCOB 4 Apr. 1971) 57
17 Dec. Ron's Journal 30-1978-The Year of Lightning Fast
New Tech (LRH ED 301 Int) 265
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
29 Dec. The Suppressed Person Rundown 276
31 Dec. Outline of PTS Handling 290
31 Dec. Educating the Potential Trouble Source, The First Step
Toward Handling: PTS C/S-1 293
1979
6 Jan. Data Series Auditing (HCO PL) (Data Series 21R)
(revision of HCO PL 15 Mar. 1971) 56
6 Jan. Suppressed Person Rundown Problems Processes
(revision of HCOB 30 Dec. 1978) 279
6 Jan. HCOB 24 July 1970 and HCOB 28 August 1970RA Canceled
(canceled-see HCOB 28 Aug. 1970RB Vol. XIII) 300
6 Jan. Correction to Ron's Journal 30-Requirements for Super
Power Auditors (LRH ED 301-1 INT) 301
9 Jan. BTB Cancellation 302
17 Jan. A New Type of Crime (HCO PL) 303
19 Jan. Cancellation (HCO PL) (Data Series 47) 304
28 Jan. C/S Qualifications 304
31 Jan. Drug Handling (C/S Series 48RD, NED Series 9RB)
(revision of HCOB 15 July 1971) 73
31 Jan. The End of Endless Drug RDs (revision of HCOB
19 Sept. 1978) 185
31 Jan. The End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List
(revision of HCOB 19 Sept. 1978) 187
31 Jan. Mood Drills 305
3 Feb. Confront Tech Has to Be Part of the TR Checksheet 311
8 Feb. Change the Civilization Eval (correction and reissue of
HCOB 3 Feb. 1979) 307
9 Feb. How to Defeat Verbal Tech 317
15 Feb. E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze (revision of HCOB
7 Feb . 1979) 312
15 Feb. Verbal Tech: Penalties 318
21 Feb. The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown
(Int. RD. Series 4RA) (revision of HCOB 24 Sept. 1978) 189
22 Feb. E-Meter Watching (revision of HCOB 8 June 1961) 1
22 Feb. E-Meter Sensitivity Setting (revision of HCOB 16 Nov.
1965) 4
22 Feb. Tech Recovery (HCO PL) (revision of HCO PL 10 Feb. 1966) 5
22 Feb. Free Needles, How to Get Them on a Pc (revision of
HCOB 11 Feb . 1966) 9
22 Feb. Auditing by Lists (revision of HCOB 3 July 1971) 70
22 Feb. Gradients in TRs (revision of HCOB 7 Apr. 1973) 142
22 Feb. E-Meters-Sensitivity Errors (revision of HCOB 18 Mar.
1974) 154
22 Feb. Errata-P.A.B. No. 147 (HCO PL) 324
Mar. Group Auditor's Handbook 325
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
6 Mar. Dianetic Clear False Declares (revision of HCOB
5 Mar. 1979) 328
15 Apr. Fine Arts versus Illustrations (Art Series 7) 331
30 Apr. Auditing the Dianetic Clear (C/S Series 106) 332
2 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive 333
2 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List 339
3 May Dianetic Clear Special Intensive-C/S and Auditor
Requirements 344
6 May E-Meter Essentials Errata Sheet (HCO PL) (correction
and reissue of HCO PL 21 Feb. 1979) 319
10 June A Professional (Art Series 8) 346
12 June Paid Comps Simplified-Addition I
-C/S Series 81 RA-Auditor's Rights Modified-Addition I
(addition to HCOB 14 June 1977 and HCOB 16 June 1972RA) 162
17 June Crashing Mis-Us: The Key to Completed Cycles of Action
and Products (W/C Series 61, Product Debug Series 3) 347
18 June The Crashing Mis-U Repair List-LC1 (Product Debug
Series 4, W/C Series 62) 357
7 July Crashing Mis-U Definition 360
16 July The "Elusive" Mis-U or Crashing Mis-U (Product Debug
Series 5, W/C Series 63) 361
17 July The Misunderstood Word Defined (W/C Series 64) 363
7 Aug. False Data Stripping (Product Debug Series 8, Esto Series
36) 367
19 Aug. High Crime-Addition-High Crime Checkouts and
Word Clearing 375
21 Aug. Twinning 377
23 Aug. Crashing MUs, Blocks to Finding Them (W/C Series 65,
Product Debug Series 6) 386
23 Aug. Product Debug Repair List (Product Debug Series 10)
391
23 Aug. Debug Tech (HCO PL) (Product Debug Series 1,
Esto Series 37) 400
23 Aug. Debug Tech Checklist (HCO PL) (Esto Series 38,
Product Debug Series 2) 408
2 Sept. Misunderstood Words and Cycles of Action (Esto Series
35RB, W/C Series 60RB, Product Debug Series 7R)
(revision of HCOB 26 Mar. 1979) 329
4 Sept. The Responsibilities of Leaders (correction and reissue
of HCOB 12 Feb. 1967) 11
23 Sept. Cancellation of Destructive BTBs and BPLs on TRs 417
24 Sept. Pc Set-Ups and C/S 53 (revision of HCOB 13 Dec. 1978)
264
24 Sept. Flying Ruds in Cramming (Cramming Series 19) 421
13 Oct. Conceptual Understanding (W/C Series 66) 425
29 Oct. SSO Responsibility for Standard Staff Courses (HCO PL)
426
14 Nov. Drug and Alcohol Cases-Prior Assessing (re-revision of
HCOB 19 May 1969) 22
CHRONOLOGICAL CONTENTS
14 Nov. Clearing Words (W/C Series 59RA) (revision of HCOB
23 Mar. 1978) 182
4 Dec. The Purification Rundown Replaces the Sweat Program
(re-revision of HCOB 6 Feb. 1978) 163
19 Dec. Method 9 Word Clearing the Right Way (W/C Series
46RC) (revision of HCOB 30 Jan. 1973) 128
20 Dec. The Purification Rundown-Errata and Additions
(amendment to HCOB 6 Feb. 1978RA) 180
21 Dec. Auditor Assignment Policies, Cramming Assignment Policies
(C/S Series 107, Cramming Series 20, Qual Corrective
Actions on OTs Series 1) 431
24 Dec. TRs Basics Resurrected 433
30 Dec. Art in Its Basics (Art Series 6) (revision of HCOB
4 Mar. 1979) 326
30 Dec. How to Build a Sauna 439
Subject Index 449
Alphabetical List of Titles 507
Cancellations and Revisions 509
LONG CONTENTS
HCO B 8 June 1961R E-METER WATCHING, 1
Reactive mind responds instantly, 1
Pc response, analytical vs. reactive, 1
Why assessments can be wrong, 1
E-Meter responds instantly, 2
How to assess Pre-Hav Scale, 2
Don't think you have to wait for a needle response, 3
HCO B 16 Nov. 1965R E-METER SENSITIVITY SETTING, 4
Setting up an E-Meter for session, 4
Determining pc's sensitivity setting, 4
HCO PL 10 Feb. 1966R TECH RECOVERY, 5
Rehabbing lower grades, 5
Overrunning free needles, 5
Rehab by rehab procedure, don't use another process, 6
Don't use unusual solutions, 6
When SP is discovered, give an S & D to his associates, 6
After SP is removed, if stats are still down, look for another SP, 6
Case Supervisor lives in an Ivory Tower, 7
Primary indication of the presence of an SP, 8
HCO B 11 Feb. 1966R FREE NEEDLES, HOW TO GET THEM ON A PC, 9
Rehabbing several overruns, 9
Free needle and sensitivity setting, 9
Pcs are most apt to go free needle after a big cog, 9
Three causes of dirty needles, 10
HCO B 12 Feb. 1967 THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEADERS, 11
Comments on power, 11
Bolivar's errors, 11
The tragedy of Manuela Saenz, 16
Seven things about power, 19
HCO B 19 May 1969RB DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES-PRIOR ASSESSING, 22
Characteristics of drug cases, 22
Prior assessment steps, 22
Noting and handling reads, 22
HCO B 16 Aug. 1969R HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY, 24
Sickness is the result of engram chains in restimulation, 24
Illness handling steps, 24
Life ruds, 25
Procedure for three S & Ds, 25
Handling a resistive illness situation, 26
HCO PL 7 Apr. 1970RB GREEN FORM, 27
Interiorization Rundown Series 6
HCO B 11 Apr. 1970R AUDITING PAST EXTERIOR, 32
"Audited over exterior" symptoms, 32
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and the Int Rundown, 32
Handling pcs who have exteriorized in auditing, 33
Interiorization Rundown Series 7
HCO B 6 May 1970R BLOWS-AUDITING PAST EXTERIOR, 34
Causes of blows, 34
Blow as an effort to exteriorize, 34
HCO B 27 May 1970R UNREADING QUESTIONS AND ITEMS, 36
Never list a listing question that doesn't read, 36
Never prepcheck an item that doesn't read, 36
What is a read, 36
Listing errors, 36
Dianetic "list" is not a listing action, 36
Things that don't read won't run, 37
Suppress and Invalidate buttons, 37
Interiorization Rundown Series 3
HCO B 30 May 1970R INTERIORIZATION INTENSIVE-2-WAY COMM, 38
Interiorization Rundown is always followed by a final session with "2-
way comm
on interiorization-exteriorization," 38
Cognition on Int RD, 38
Interiorization Rundown Series 8
HCO B 20 Aug. 1970R INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN MUSTS, 40
Interiorization Rundown rules, 40
Completing the rundown on an intensive basis, 40
Int Rundown must be flubless, 41
Int Rundown must be followed by a two-way comm session, 41
Interiorization Rundown Series 2
HCO B 4 Jan. 1971R EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA-THE
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED, 43
Auditing trouble after exteriorization, 43
Exteriorization defined, 44
Engram behavior, 44
The missed beginning of an exteriorization, 45
Remedy is to audit out interiorizations, 45
Int Rundown Revised by steps, 45
Int buttons, 46
Running Int with R3RA, 48
Vital data on Int RD end phenomenon 48
Future auditing, 49
Warning, 49
The end of endless Int repair, 49
Summary, 50
Interiorization Rundown Series 9
HCO B 13 Jan. 1971R EXTERIORIZATION, 51
Interiorization Rundown flubs, 51
No auditor may audit materials or apply HCOBs on which he has not been
starrated, 52
C/S Series 28RA-1RA
HCO B 7 Mar. 1971-1RA USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS, 53
How to C/S a case for Quad Dianetics, 53
Dianetic Full Flow Table, 54
Auditing the fourth flow on Int, 54
Flubs, 54
Requirements to audit Quad Dianetics, 55
Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing, 55 Results of Quad Dianetics, 55
Data Series 21R
HCO PL 15 Mar. 1971R DATA SERIES AUDITING, 56
Handling a student who cannot grasp or retain the data of the Data
Series
policy letters, 56
C/S Series 32 RA-1 RC
HCO B 4 Apr. 1971-1RC USE OF QUAD DIANETICS, 57
Triple Dianetics, 57
Quad, 57
Int RD, 57
Run only flows that instant read when called, 57
Full Flow Table, 58
The four flows, 58
Multiple somatic items, 58
Repair, 58
Result, 59
Offering Full Flow Dianetics, 59
Warning, 59
HCO B 30 June 1971RB
EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD- EXGF 40RD, 60
HCO B 3 July 1971R AUDITING BY LISTS, 70
Auditing by Lists, Method 3, 70
Going earlier similar in Auditing by Lists, 71
Auditing by Lists procedure, 71
Big win, 71
GF and Method 3, 72
GF is best done by Method 5, 72
L1C, L3RF, L7 and other such lists are best done Method 3, 72
C/S Series 48RD
New Era Dianetics Series 9RB
HCO B 15 July 1971RC DRUG HANDLING, 73
Person who has been on drugs is one of the "seven types of resistive
cases," 73
Effects of drugs, 73
Drug engrams, 74
Those on drugs, 74
Drugs are done first, 75
Full Drug Rundown steps, 75
Interiorization Rundown Series 11
HCO B 24 Sept. 1971R INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN-CORRECTION
DRILL: DATE TO BLOW/LOCATE TO BLOW, 79
Unnecessary Int Rundowns, 79
Flubbed R3RA, 79
Overrun Int Rundown, 79
Reason for errors on Int Rundown, 80
Headaches and Int Rundown, 80
Correction Drill for an Int Rundown, 80
Auditor requirements to do Int RD correction, 80
Failed Int/Ext RD repair, date to blow-locate to blow procedure, 81
Interiorization Rundown Series 12
HCO B 29 Oct. 1971RA INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST REVISED, 84
HCO B 9 Dec. 1971RC PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED, 90
Cause of roller-coaster is PTS, 90
Who does PTS handlings, 90
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and the PTS Rundown, 91
The only PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a
roller-coaster comes from having known the person before this
life, 91
Four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown, 91
Behavior of the PTS Rundown, 92
PTS Rundown end phenomena, 92
Description of flows on PTS Rundown, 92
Re-dos on PTS Rundown, 93
Commands and steps of the PTS Rundown, 93
Do not run unreading flows, 96
Repair, 96
C/S Series 35RB
Interiorization Series 10
HCO B 16 Dec. 1971RB INTERIORIZATION ERRORS, 98
Correct an Int RD error as a first action, 98
Int Rundown errors, 98
Int Rundown auditor requirements, 99
Repair of Int RD, 99
Ext in session, 99
Dianetic C/S- 1, 100
Interiorization Rundown Series 15
C/S Series 23RB
HCO B 17 Dec. 1971RB INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY, 102
References covering the subject of interiorization/exteriorization,
102
Unnecessary Int RD being done, 103
Quads or Triples, 103
Int RD overrun, 103
Repair of Int RD, 104
Two-way comm step of Int RD, 104
Preassessments, AESPs not used on Int RDs 104
C/Sing Int RD, 104
Int RD is a remedy, 105
C/S wins, 106
HCO B 1 Jan. 1972RB LIX HI-LO TA LIST REVISED, 107
HCO B 20 Jan. 1972R PTS RD ADDITION, 124
The only reasons a PTS RD does not work, 124
Rules of PTS, 124
Remedies for PTS Rundown errors, 124
HCO B 3 June 1972RA PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP, 126
"Can't have" steps and commands, 126
SPs are SPs because they deny Hav and enforce unwanted Hav, 127
L & N questions and the PTS RD, 127
Word Clearing Series 46RC
HCO B 30 Jan. 1973RC METHOD 9 WORD CLEARING THE RIGHT WAY, 128
History of Method 9 Word Clearing, 128
How to learn Method 9, 129
Misunderstood words, 129
Why Method 9 works, 130
The glib student, 131
Method 9 on common reading materials, 132
How to do Method 9, 132
Method 9 caution, 134
Examples of student reactions and their correct handling, 135
TRs and M9, 140
Quarrels or upsets, 140
Worksheets, 140
Teaching the student to do Method 0 140
HCO B 7 Apr. 1973RA GRADIENTS IN TRs, 142
[ CANCELED]
Purpose of TRs, 142
How to do TRs, 142
Cycling through the TRs, 143
C/S Series 87RB
HCO B 15 Oct. 1973RB NULLING AND F/Ning PREPARED LISTS, 144
To F/N a list, you do it Method 3, 144 "Non-reading, non-F/Ning"
lists, 144
Reading through an F/N, 145
The "rabbit buttons, " 145
C/S Series 53RL SF
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973RD SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S, 147
C/S Series 53RL LF
HCO B 24 Nov. 1973RE C/S SERIES 53 RL LF (LONG FORM), 150
HCO B 18 Mar. 1974R E-METERS-SENSITIVITY ERRORS, 154
An auditor must set the sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly right for
each pc and each session, 154
Too low sensitivity, 154
Too high sensitivity, 154
Set the sensitivity for the pc for 1/3 of a dial drop on a correct can
squeeze per E-Meter Drill 5RA, 155
HCO B 29 Mar. 1975R ANTIBIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF, 156
Definition of antibiotics, 156
Germs and virus, 156
Bringing down temperature with antibiotics, 156
How to administer antibiotics, 157
Antibiotics and temperature, 157
The general rule when administering antibiotics, 158
Antibiotics taking effect, 158 Past maladministration of antibiotics,
158
Person on antibiotics is given vitamins before session, 158
Key procedure, 159
Side effects of antibiotics, 159
Disease cycles, 159
Sulfa drugs, 159
Penicillin, 160
Other antibiotics, 161
Vitamins and antibiotics, 161
Intestinal bacteria, 161
HCO B 14 June 1977-1 PAID COMPS SIMPLIFIED-ADDITION 1- C/S SERIES 81RA-
AUDITOR's RIGHTS MODIFIED-ADDITION 1, 162
Paid Completion points for Dianetic Clear Special Intensives, 162
HCO B 6 Feb. 1978RA THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES
THE SWEAT PROGRAM, 163
Biochemical factors, 164
Why "Purification"? 164
The Purification Rundown, 166
Warning, 167
Exercise and sauna, 167
Personal schedule, 168
Nutrition, 169
Niacin, 172
Minerals, 174
Cal-Mag, 174
Manifestations that turn up on the Purification Program, 175
Having trips during the program, 176
Administration of the Purification Rundown, 176
End phenomena, 178
Length of program, 179
Summary, 179
HCO B 6 Feb. 1978RA-1 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN-ERRATA AND ADDITIONS, 180
When to wear a rubberized or vinyl-type sweat suit, 180
The 5-hour period is NOT 50% exercising and 50% sauna, 180
Getting too warm or feeling faint in the sauna, 180
Steam baths, 181
Eucalyptus oil, 181
Word Clearing Series 59RA
HCO B 23 Mar. 1978RA CLEARING WORDS, 182
How to clear a word, 182
Example of how to clear a word, 183
Context unknown, 183
"Word chains, " 183
Cleared word defined, 183
HCO B 19 Sept. 1978R THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RDs, 185
Reason for endless Drug Rundowns, 185
Data on the End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List, 185
New Era Dianetics Drug Rundown a separate action, 186
HCO B 19 Sept. 1978R THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST, 187
Interiorization Rundown Series BRA
HCO B 24 Sept. 1978RA THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN, 189
When to run an End of Endless Int Rundown, 190
Int Rundown Table, 191
The End of Endless Int Rundown procedure, 192
The Int buttons, 193
Cautions and C/S tips, 194
Vital data on Int RD end phenomena, 195
Repairing repair, 196
Interiorization Rundown Series 13
HCO B 24 Sept. 1978 PREASSESSMENT, AESPs AND INT, 199
When handling Int you address only Int, nothing else, 199
You do not run preassessment or AESPs on Int, 199
HCO B 24 Sept. 1978 DIANETIC CLEAR, 200
The state of Clear can be achieved on Dianetics, 200
Definition of the state of Dianetic Clear, 200
Auditing the Dianetic Clear, 200
Interiorization Rundown Series 5
HCO B 25 Sept. 1978 QUAD COMMANDS FOR INT BUTTONS, 201
R3RA Quad Flows commands for each of the Int buttons on the
Interiorization Rundown Revised, 201
Recall Quad Flows commands for each of the Int buttons on the End of
Endless Int Repair Rundown, 203
Interiorization Rundown Series 14
HCO B 25 Sept. 1978 STARRATE CHECKOUTS FOR INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN, 206
Int must be run flawlessly, 206
Starrate checkouts for "Okay to Audit Int RD," 207
HCO B 29 Sept. 1978 FESing OF FOLDERS AND FULL FLOW TABLES, 209
The name of the auditor should be clearly noted on the FFT as well as
the FES, 209
Full Flow Table format, 209
HCO B 3 Oct. 1978 NED RULE, 210
NED auditor must understand the function and purpose of each of the
R3RA commands in a Dianetic session, 210
Interiorization Rundown Series 1
HCO B 4 Oct. 1978 INTERIORIZATION HANDLING SIMPLIFIED, 211
Definition of exteriorization, 211
Two very effective new tools for handling Int, 211
Further data on the subject of Int and flows, 212 More on Recalls, 213
HCO B 16 Oct. 1978 REPAIR CORRECTION LIST, 214
Interiorization Rundown Series 16
C/S Series 102
HCO B 16 Oct. 1978 C/S CHECKLIST OF INT ERRORS, 217
Two major errors that occur most frequently on Int handling, 217
C/S checklist for detecting errors on Int, 217
HCO B 30 Oct. 1978 C/S SERIES 53, USE OF, 220
What the C/S Series 53 Short Form is, 220
What the C/S Series 53 Long Form is, 220
Two ways of using a C/S 53, 220
Clears, OTs and the C/S 53, 221
F/Ning a C/S 53, 221
C/S 53 to F/Ning list, 221
Pcs that have gotten bugged by C/S 53 being done on them, 222
HCO B 30 Oct. 1978 COURSES-THEIR IDEAL SCENE, 223
An in-ethics vs. an out-ethics course, 223
Out-ethics activities in course rooms, 223
HCO B 10 Nov. 1978R PROCLAMATION-POWER TO FORGIVE, 225
The power to forgive sins, 225
The purpose of any Confessional, 225
HCO B 10 Nov. 1978R PROCLAMATION: POWER TO FORGIVE ADDITION, 227
Handling any adverse reaction to the proclamation of forgiveness, 227
Errors that can cause an incomplete confession, 227
HCO B 15 Nov. 1978 DATING AND LOCATING, 228
Definitions of dating and locating, 228
Why you date and locate, 228
Date/Locate not a rote procedure, 229
Definition of blow, 229
Metering during Dating/Locating, 229
You can use any system of time measurement in dating, 230
Implant dates vs. actual dates, 230
Purpose of dating, 230
Locations and distance, 231
Purpose of locating, 231
There are two separate drills for dating and locating, 232
Preliminary step before dating and locating on a pc for the first
time, 232
Dating to blow/locating to blow-procedure by steps, 233
Liability, 236
Summary, 236
HCO B 19 Nov. 1978 L & N LISTS-THE ITEM "ME," 237
Rules regarding the item "Me" on an L & N list, 237
Word Clearing Series SERF
HCO B 27 Nov. 1978 WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST, 238
HCO B 28 Nov. 1978 AUDITORS WHO MISS WITHHOLDS, PENALTY, 242
Penalty for missing a withhold on a pc, 242
C/S Series 104
HCO B 29 Nov. 1978 DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS, 243
Warning to NED and Scn auditors, 243
Note for C/Ses, 243
Clear in last life, 243
Inval/eval and the state of Clear, 244
Comm-evable offense to coach the pc with data about Clear in any way,
244
The power of auditing, 244
HCO B 30 Nov. 1978 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE, 245
What withholds add up to, 245
Basic procedure for a Confessional, 246
Auditor attitude and TRs, 250
HCO B 1 Dec. 1978 PROGRAMMING THE DIANETIC CLEAR FOR HIS NEXT STEP, 252
Guidelines for programming a Dianetic Clear, 252
"Super Power" for Dianetic Clears, 252
HCO B 3 Dec. 1978 UNREADING FLOWS, 253
Don't run unreading items or flows, 253
HCO B 4 Dec. 1978 HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N, 254
When taking a list to F/Ning assessment an auditor must know how to
read through an F/N, 254
Training an auditor to see a read through an F/N, 255
C/S Series 105
HCO B 5 Dec. 1978 DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS-ADDITIONAL DATA, 256
Unacknowledged Dianetic Clears, 256
Ethics, 256
Meter phenomena, 257
Prior Dianetic Clears and Keyed-Out Clears, 257
The person who hasn't made it, 257
Next step for Dianetic Clears, 258
Summary, 258
HCO B 6 Dec. 1978 REVIVIFICATION, 259
Definition of revivification, 259
Revivification is apt to occur on the End of Endless Int Repair, 259
HCO B 7 Dec. 1978 HCOB 1 OCTOBER 1978, HCOB 6 OCTOBER 1978 ON BRIGHT THINK
RUNDOWN WITHDRAWN, 260
HCO B 8 Dec. 1978 GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF, 261
How to use the Green Form, 261
Resistive cases, 261
Handling reads, 261
Clears, OTs, and Dianetic Clears, 262
Unhandled drugs reading on the EXGF 40RD, 262
End phenomena of Green Form and EXGF 40RD, 262
HCO PL 9 Dec. 1978 HCO PL 23 OCT. 76 AND BPL 29 NOV. 1976 CANCELED, 263
HCO B 13 Dec. 1978R PC SET-UPS AND C/S 53, 264
Every major action does not require a C/S 53 to F/Ning list as a set-
up, 264
A pc must be set up before a major action, 264
LRH ED 301 INT RON'S JOURNAL 30-1978-THE YEAR OF LIGHTNING FAST NEW TECH,
265
Discoveries and advancements in tech in 1978, 266
Training, 269
Class IV auditing action that can be run, 269
Services that are given at Saint Hill Orgs, 271
Advanced Org services, 272
Flag Ship Org services, 273
Scientology in 1978, 274
HCO B 29 Dec. 1978 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN, 276
A magical new rundown, 276
When the rundown is done, 277
How the rundown is done, 277
Who the rundown can be done on, 278
Auditor and C/S note, 278
HCO B 30 Dec. 1978 SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN-PROBLEMS PROCESSES, 279
Definition of problem, 279
Problems Processes, 280
End phenomena of the Suppressed Person Rundown, 280
List of Problems Processes and commands, 280
HCO B 31 Dec. 1978 OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING, 290
Educating the PTS person, 290
Use of the PTS C/S-1, 290
PTS interview, 290
Handling, 290
The book What Is Scientology? is a very useful tool, 291
Can We Ever Be Friends? cassette, 291
PTS person is given a program to do, 291
Flying ruds and overts Triple or Quad Flow on the antagonistic
terminal, 291
When the PTS Rundown is done, 292
Use and EP of the Suppressed Person Rundown, 292
Rest, quiet and a safe environment, 292
HCO B 31 Dec. 1978 EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST
STEP TOWARD HANDLING: PTS C/S-1, 293
PTS C/S- 1, 294
PTS C/S-1 procedure, 295
Issues to be read by the PTS student or pc, 295
PTS C/S- 1 definitions sheet, 296
HCO B 6 Jan. 1979 HCOB 24 JULY 1970 AND HCOB 28 AUGUST 1970RA [CANCELED)
CANCELED, 300
Use of the HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists, 300
LRH ED 301-1 INT CORRECTION TO RON'S JOURNAL 30-REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPER
POWER AUDITORS, 301
Requirements for Super Power auditors, 301
HCO B 9 Jan. 1979 BTB CANCELLATION, 302
No auditor may audit in an HGC who has not done a Hard TRs Course, 302
Once an auditor's TRs are "IN" they don't go out, 302
HCO PL 17 Jan. 1979 A NEW TYPE OF CRIME, 303
Technical perversions, 303
New type of crime: to alter and pervert tech or procedure to prevent
discovery of withholds, 303
Data Series 47
HCO PL 19 Jan. 1979 CANCELLATION, 304
BTB 2 Sept. 72R Issue II, Why Finding Drill-Two, is canceled, 304
HCO B 28 Jan. 1979 C/S QUALIFICATIONS, 304
C/S must not C/S for a level for which he has not been trained, 304
HCO B 31 Jan. 1979 MOOD DRILLS, 305
Beings can be fixed or stuck in a chronic mood, 305
Why Mood Drills were developed, 305
Patter for Mood Drills, 305
50 Foot Mood Drills, 306
HCO B 3 Feb. 1979 CHANGE THE CIVILIZATION EVAL, 307
Evaluation to handle TRs and tech being out internationally, 307
HCO B 3 Feb. 1979 CONFRONT TECH HAS TO BE PART OF THE
TR CHECKSHEET, 311
Inability to confront is basically caused by withholds, 311
The world begins anew by regaining the ability to confront, 311
HCO B 7 Feb. 1979R E-METER DRILL 5RA-CAN SQUEEZE, 312
Procedure for E-Meter Drill 5RA, 312
How a can squeeze can be done incorrectly, 312
What a correct can squeeze is, 313
Setting the sensitivity for a 1/3 of a dial drop of the needle on the
can squeeze, 315
Why one has to use a sensitivity setting that gives 1/3 of a dial
drop, 315
HCO B 9 Feb. 1979 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH, 317
HCO B 15 Feb. 1979 VERBAL TECH PENALTIES, 318
Penalty for verbal tech, 318
What constitutes verbal tech, 318
HCO PL 21 Feb. 1979 E-METER ESSENTIALS ERRATA SHEET, 319
Corrections to be made in E-Meter Essentials 319
HCO PL 22 Feb. 1979 ERRATA-P.A.B. No. 147, 324
Typo in P.A.B. No. 147 in Technical Volume III, 324
Art Series 6
HCO B 4 Mar. 1979R ART IN ITS BASICS, 326
Every separate sector of artistic creations has its own basic rules,
326
The distance between amateured junk and an effective product, 326
Be a professional in whatever you do, 327
HCO B 5 Mar. 1979R DIANETIC CLEAR FALSE DECLARES, 328
Natural Clear, 328
Falsely declaring a person a Dianetic Clear is actionable, 328
Other practices do not produce Dianetic Clears, 328
Any and all false declares are canceled, 328
Esto Series 35RB
Word Clearing Series 60RB Product Debug Series 7R
HCO B 25 Mar. 1979RB MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND CYCLES OF ACTION, 329
Misunderstood words and no product, 329
Misunderstoods and perception, 329
Misunderstoods and complexity, 329
Misunderstoods and total organize, 330
Misunderstoods and no organize, 330
References for handling Crashing Mis-Us, 330
Art Series 7
HCO B 15 Apr. 1979 FINE ARTS VERSUS ILLUSTRATIONS, 331
The division between fine arts and illustrations, 331
C/S Series 106
HCO B 30 Apr. 1979 AUDITING THE DIANETIC CLEAR, 332
Giving Quad Grades to the Dianetic Clear without making full use of
the Expanded Grades, 332
Ensuring that the Dianetic Clear has the opportunity to attain all the
benefits of the grades, 332
HCO B 2 May 1979 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE, 333
Situations the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive is designed to sort
out, 333
Purchase of auditing for the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive, 334
Use of the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive, 334
FES and folder study, 334
Alternative choices to handle certain pcs, 334
Procedure, 335
End phenomena, 337
D/L caution, 338
HCO B 2 May 1979 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE ASSESSMENT, LIST, 339
HCO B 3 May 1979 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE-C/S AND AUDITOR
REQUIREMENTS, 344
List of requirements for every C/S and auditor delivering this
intensive, 344
Art Series 8
HCO B 10 June 1979 A PROFESSIONAL, 346
What a professional is, 346
What separates a member of the audience from a professional, 346
Word Clearing Series 61
Product Debug Series 3
HCO B 17 June 1979 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION
AND PRODUCTS, 347
Incomplete cycles and misunderstoods, 347
Application of Crashing Mis-U tech, 347
Theory, 348
Crashing Mis-U finding, 348
Procedure, 348
End phenomena, 350
Running into O/Ws when doing Crashing Mis-U finding, 350
Defense mechanism, 351
The Word Clearer's Mis-Us, 351
Crashing Mis-U finding is an integral part of debug tech, 352
When to stop debugging, 352
Gradient approach, 352
Examples, 352
Case histories to show how Crashing Mis-U finding goes, 353
Cautions, 356
Repair, 356
Effects of Crashing Mis-Us, 356
Summary, 356
Product Debug Series 4
Word Clearing Series 62
HCO B 18 June 1979 THE CRASHING MIS-U REPAIR LIST-LC1, 357
HCO B 7 July 1979 CRASHING MIS-U DEFINITION, 360
Product Debug Series 5
Word Clearing Series 63
HCO B 16 July 1979 THE "ELUSIVE" MIS-U OR CRASHING MIS-U, 361
M9 Word Clearing does not uncover false data, Crashing Mis-Us, overts,
withholds or PTSness, 361
Handling the Crashing Mis-U in situations where M9 is really not
getting much done, 361
Word Clearing Series 64
HCO B 17 July 1979 THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED, 363
"Mis-understood" and "not-understood," 363
Types of misunderstood words, 363
Product Debug Series 8
Esto Series 36
HCO B 7 Aug. 1979 FALSE DATA STRIPPING, 367
Verbal hatting is the main source of false definitions and false data,
367
Primary reason people cannot be hatted, 368
Sources of false data, 368
Use of False Data Stripping, 368
Socratic thesis-antithesis-synthesis philosophical equation, 369
Anatomy of the "glib student," 369
People prone to accepting false data, 370
Procedure for False Data Stripping, 370
Steps for False Data Stripping, 370
EP of False Data Stripping, 373
Misunderstoods can come up during False Data Stripping, 373
Repeated use of False Data Stripping, 373
Cautions, 374
Summary, 374
HCO B 19 Aug. 1979 HIGH CRIME-ADDITION-HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS AND WORD
CLEARING, 375
Consequences of no Word Clearing, 375
Word Clearing requirements, 375
Former High Crime checkouts, 376
Technical results, 376
HCO B 21 Aug. 1979 TWINNING, 377
This HCOB reinstates twinning firmly and with emphasis, 377
Background, 378
Why twinning? 378
Twinning versus modern permissiveness, 378
Cause and effect, 379
When to twin, 379
Assigning twins, 380
Twinning is done on a "turn-about" basis, 380
The twin's responsibility, 381
The Supervisor's responsibility, 382
Emphasis on no verbal data, 382
Handling bugs on twinning, 383
Handling bogged students and their twins, 384
Word Clearing Series 65
Product Debug Series 6
HCO B 23 Aug. 1979 CRASHING MUs, BLOCKS TO FINDING THEM, 386
What Crashing MUs can be buried by, 386
References for full handling of a Crashing MU, 387
Definition of Crashing MU, 387
Other MUs obscuring the Crashing MU, 387
Overts and withholds blocking Crashing MU finding, 387
Person who justifies having a Crashing MU, 388
Service facsimiles getting in the way of Crashing MU finding, 389
Cautions, 389
Summary, 389
Product Debug Series 10
HCO B 23 Aug. 1979 PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST, 391
Product Debug Series 1
Esto Series 37
HCO PL 23 Aug. 1979 DEBUG TECH, 400
History, 400
The tech, 401
What to handle, 406
The EP of debug, 407
Evaluation and programming, 407
Esto Series 38
Product Debug Series 2
HCO PL 23 Aug. 1979 DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST, 408
Production is the basis of morale, 408
Use of the Debug Checklist, 408
The EP of debug, 409
The first action in debugging an area is an inspection, 409
The checklist, 409
HCO B 23 Sept. 1979 CANCELLATION OF DESTRUCTIVE BTBs AND BPLs ON TRs,
417
List of issues canceled and reasons for cancellation, 417
Summary, 420
Cramming Series 19
HCO B 24 Sept. 1979 FLYING RUDS IN CRAMMING, 421
How to fly ruds in cramming, 421
Previously mis-done cramming, 421
Cramming Officer qualifications, 422
Worksheets, 422
A C/S is not needed before flying ruds in cramming, 422
Folder check before cramming, 423
FESing, 423
Use the tech, 423
Attachment 1, 424
Attachment 2, 424
Word Clearing Series 66
HCO B 13 Oct. 1979 CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, 425
People who have no idea of concept get bogged into terms and
mechanics, 425
Understanding is conceptual, 425
HCO PL 29 Oct. 1979 SSO RESPONSIBILITY FOR STANDARD STAFF COURSES, 426
Putting staff courses there, 426
Getting staff courses attended, 427
Executive support, 427
People who don't study, 428
SSO authority, 428
Some advice for SSOs, 428
C/S Series 107
Cramming Series 20
Quay Corrective Actions on OTs Series 1
HCO B 21 Dec. 1979 AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT POLICIES, CRAMMING ASSIGNMENT
POLICIES, 431
Rule that auditor-pc assignments must be by comparable grade and
class, 431
Policy not to assign non-OT Cramming Officers to OTs, 431
Actions which are not OK and which are OK to do in Cramming, 432
HCO B 24 Dec. 1979 TRs BASICS RESURRECTED, 433
Omitted checksheet and false data, 434
The communication formula in clay, 435
Use of the ARC triangle, 435
TRs the Hard Way, 436
End phenomenon of TRs, 437
Prerequisite, 437
Summary, 437
HCO B 30 Dec. 1979 HOW TO BUILD A SAUNA, 439
Sauna: definition of, 439
Building a sauna, 439
Sources of heat, 441
Sauna stones, 443
Construction of the sauna, 445
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JUNE 1961R
Tech REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Qual
(Revisions in this type style)
E-METER WATCHING
ARE YOU WAITING FOR THE METER TO PLAY DIXIE?
I have been a bit surprised by the length of time it is taking people
to do assessments on the Prehav, on Security Checks and goals.
A query into this, which may reveal more, has discovered that students
wait patiently for the meter to react, which Mary Sue has noticed.
It dawns on me that auditors believe they are doing an analytical
assessment on the Prehav, etc. This is wrong.
The Prehav Scale is not a picture of analytical thought. It is in the
order it is in because it is a picture of reactive thought. It is how the
reactive mind is stacked up. (See Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental
Health for the chapter on the reactive mind. )
Now an E-Meter reacts only on the reactive mind. A Clear doesn't react
because he is able to be conscious. An aberree reacts because he can't
think without thought exciting the reactivity of the reactive mind. This,
being composed of mass, energy, space, time and thought, responds to tiny
electrical impulses.
If your auditing was not aimed at reactivity it would not register on a
meter. Thus, you run what reacts because it reacts and is therefore part of
the reactive mind.
The reactive mind responds instantly on data a billion years ago. How
is this? Time in the reactive mind is out of order. So is space. So is
matter, so is energy. Pin a sign on the reactive mind: "Out of Order." It
connects wrong connections. Hence, the E-Meter.
What is wrong with the pc is not known to the pc. Therefore if a pc
knows all about it, it isn't wrong with him.
That's why you never run what the pc says. You run only what the meter
says. Example: pc is sure his current general Prehav Level that should be
run now is "Order or Command." "Order" rapidly vanishes. "Command" follows
suit. CONQUER stays in. This is an actual example. I just assessed it a few
minutes ago on a pc who is in pretty good shape. He didn't like CONQUER. He
said Order and Command were long track. Somebody running a Q and A on his
assessment would have said, perhaps, the pc knows best, so we'll run Order.
Even if it doesn't fall. But when I said it was CONQUER that we were going
to run as only it now fell, the pc sighed and gave in. Finding the Conquer
level questions produced a very responsive meter needle. It was wrong with
the pc because he didn't know about it. It was part of his reactive mind.
Order and Command were analytical responses prompted by an entirely
different thing CONQUER. If Order or Command had been run the pc would have
had a lot of auditing time wasted on him.
Now, why are assessments wrong sometimes? Because the auditor is
persuaded by the pc, not the meter. If the pc and the meter agree, so what.
You can still run it. But only if the meter says so, for only then is it
reactive.
Now, what about slow assessments? Well, the auditor thinks the pc must
consider things before he answers, waits for the pc to answer and waits for
the question to sink in so the meter will react.
This is entirely wrong. Based on a misunderstanding of assessment, the
meter and the reactive mind.
1. The pc does not have to be given a chance to think before the
needle responds.
2. The pc does not have to answer or say one word to make the
needle respond.
3. All needle response is reactive.
4. There is no time in the reactive mind.
5. If the pc knew what was wrong with him it wouldn't be wrong.
6. Only the meter knows.
7. The auditor has more control over the pc's reactive mind than
the pc since the pc is influenced by the reactive mind responses
and the auditor is not so influenced.
The meter responds instantly. The reaction you will get on the needle
starts to occur on the needle instantly after you utter it.
There is no need to sit there afterwards waiting for the needle to
respond again, for it won't until you push that button again.
The only wait is caused by letting the needle come back at the end of a
fall. This may take one second.
Therefore: TO WAIT MORE THAN ONE SECOND BEFORE UTTERING THE NEXT WORD
ON THE LIST IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF AUDITING TIME.
All the response you want will begin to occur instantly after you utter
a goal, terminal, level or security question. Thus the maximum time between
questions on the Prehav Level is at most a three-second interval of silence
while you digest the data.
Further, on an assessment for a Prehav run on the General Scale (as in
Routine 2, HCOB 5 June 1961), you do not now say, "Do you . . ." or any
other dunnage. You just say the level itself, note response, put a pencil
point down on the level if it responds, say the next word, etc., etc. Takes
about 5 minutes to run the Primary Scale up and down to find its level. You
start at the bottom. You just say the word. If it responds you dot the
sheet (using different symbols to tell them apart like dots, X's, lines).
Then go back down the scale touching only those you marked going up. Add
another dot if they still fall or react. Then play off those left one
against the other, saying a level only once each time. The remaining level
is now the only one that reacts. So you assemble your 5-way bracket and
carry on with auditing.
The pc doesn't have to say a word throughout the whole assessment. You
can even ask him politely not to, as breath going in and out in speech can
vibrate the needle.
When you assess over into the Secondary Scale of the level you found,
you do exactly the same as above. You read them all off once, then only
those that reacted, eliminate them and you've got it. (And, by the way, if
you go over the Secondary Scale, you then don't only run levels on that
Secondary forever; in each new assessment you use the Primary Scale again
to find a new Secondary Level to assess.)
This is also true of a Joburg. If you're going to get a reaction on the
needle, it will come fast. No waiting. If you get a reaction you clear that
reaction, not the pc's whole life. The moment the needle is null, you go on
to the next question. Of course, in a Joburg, the pc talks. He better!
All auditing actions except the CCHs are now done in Model Session.
And all auditing actions and questions are done effectively, neither
frantically rushed nor slowly.
So it boils down to this. Weeks can be added to Joburgs and assessments
if you think you have to wait for a needle response.
What are you waiting for? The whole action only requires a second.
Don't wait for the E-Meter to play Dixie. It was made in the Nawth.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:imj.rd.jk
Copyright � 1961, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 NOVEMBER 1965R
Remimeo REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Tech (Revisions in this type style)
Qual (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
All Auditors
E-Meter
Checksheets
E-METER SENSITIVITY SETTING
(Ref: HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN
E-METER
HCOB 24 Jan 77 TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP
HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA-CAN SQUEEZE)
When preparing for a session, an auditor sets up his E-Meter as per E-
Meter Drill 4.
The sensitivity is set for 1/3 of a dial drop on a correct can squeeze
per HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA CAN SQUEEZE. This is done for each
individual pc and at the beginning of each session before starting the
session, and with the pc on the cans, per HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR
SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-METER.
There is no set sensitivity setting for a pc at any grade level. It is
determined by the pays can squeeze at each session.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kim
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF l0 FEBRUARY 1966R
Remimeo ISSUE II
Tech Hats REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Qual Hats (Revisions in this type style)
Ethics Hats
TECH RECOVERY
(Ref: HCOB 7 Feb 79R, E-METER DRILL 5RA-CAN SQUEEZE)
My study of a Nov 1965 plummeting HGC Completion Statistic indicates
certain policies are necessary in all HGCs and Qual Divisions.
The following errors were found:
1. The HGC ceased to look for former release grades to
rehabilitate and ignored opportunities to do so on the basis that "outer
orgs have rehabbed them already." This came out in the Comm Ev held on a D
of P of that period. Of course, if the HGC failed to rehab earlier grades
(or earlier life overruns) it could achieve no later grades or Grade V.
This alone would have ended completions promptly on all grades and wiped
out the graph.
2. Invalidation of the appearance of a free needle and
invalidating any auditor who "thought he saw one." This wiped out all
Release attainments and made for total overrun of all pcs of all grades.
This error existed for 15 years so it is not surprising that it got back in
again.
3. Whenever an overrun occurred, "rehabilitation of it" was done
by running different new processes instead of standard rehab routine as in
HCOBs, i.e. doing ARC break PPS, rudiments anything but a real rehab of
that process that was overrun.
4. Abandonment of standard tech in favor of unusual solutions.
This is always present when a collapse of tech occurs.
5. One SP was found in the middle of all this but after his
departure the statistic did not recover so one can assume another SP was in
the middle of it still or that the HGC remained PTS and didn't separate
from the SP found because he was so convincing, so reasonable and so
persuasive as to why a tech statistic must remain down.
It is interesting that (1) above-Ceasing to rehab lower grades-would be
absolutely fatal to any upper grades. Therefore this becomes policy:
NO UPPER GRADE OF RELEASE MAY BE BEGUN NEWLY ON A PC UNTIL ALL LOWER
GRADES ARE FULLY REHABBED TO FREE NEEDLE. THIS APPLIES TO ALL GRADES 0 TO
VII.
Regarding (2)-Invalidation of what a free needle is-and thus running
past all free needless let it be noted that this is an Auditor's Code break-
continuing a process that has ceased to produce change-and is therefore a
crime. This was wrong too long to be allowed to go wrong again. Thus we get
the policy:
AN AUDITOR WHO HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE OVERRUN A FREE NEEDLE ON A
PERCALE MUST BE GIVEN AN ETHICS CHIT; AND IF THE ACTION IS SEVERAL TIMES
REPEATED, ETHICS MUST ORDER A FULL REVIEW OF THE AUDITOR'S CASE INCLUDING
AN EYESIGHT TEST AND CONDUCT A THOROUGH ETHICS INVESTIGATION AND HEARING.
Note that a meter run with too high a sensitivity setting does not give a
marked change when the needle floats. A meter cranked up to 128 sensitivity
looks like a floating needle all of the time at a casual glance on most
pcs. On the other hand, if the sensitivity is set too low then the free
needle may not be seen. Thus the sensitivity must be set for 1/3 of a dial
drop on the can squeeze for each session. Then a free needle will be
plainly visible.
Also. meters go out of 5,000 ohm calibration and don't read on the M
and F "Clear" reads and change of electrodes can change M and F "Clear"
reads.
A free needle, if a process is overrun, vanishes with just one extra
command so an auditor must be alert.
Please also note that this has been part of the Auditor's Code for ages-
running past a flat point of a process has been forbidden since the first
formulations of the Auditor's Code.
Regarding (3)-Rehabilitation by using other processes-the HCOBs on
rehabs are very explicit. To run another process would clobber the pc. Thus
we get the policy:
REHABILITATIONS MUST BE DONE BY REHABILITATING THE PC ONLY ON THE
PROCESS OVERRUN AND ONLY BY STANDARD HCOBs ON REHAB PROCEDURE.
Re (4)-Unusual solutions-we get the policy:
ANY AUDITOR ACCEPTING AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION WITHOUT FILING A JOB
ENDANGERMENT CHIT OR FOUND USING AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION MUST BE CHARGED WITH A
CRIME AND GIVEN AN ETHICS HEARING. FAILING TO REPORT AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION
ADVISED OR USED IS ALSO SO HANDLED. AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION IS ONE EVOLVED TO
REMEDY AN ABUSE OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGY.
On (5)-Statistic failing to recover after an SP is spotted in a
department gives us the 2 policies:
WHENEVER AN SP IS DISCOVERED AND DECLARED IN AN ORGANIZATION ALL HIS
ASSOCIATES IN THAT PORTION OF THE ORG MUST BE CHECKED OUT FOR OR GIVEN AN S
& D.
And
WHEN AN SP IS DISCOVERED IN AN ORGANIZATION, IS DISMISSED OR REMOVED
AND THE STATISTIC DOES NOT RECOVER, ANOTHER SP MUST BE LOOKED FOR.
It is noted that the general condition of the Completion Statistic of
Dec 65 to Jan 66 could be attributed to the above gross errors.
It is now certain that (l) rehabilitation of earlier grades, (2) free
needle and (3) rehabilitation by standard practice are primary targets in
our technology for anyone seeking to mess it up and that unwitting
tampering with these three things and lack of HCO enforcement on them will
reduce HGC statistics and prevent their recovery.
Of course one could also go mad in the opposite direction-(1)
rehabilitate earlier grades endlessly on a pc regardless of how many times
a free needle had been obtained, (2) call any loosening up of a needle a
free needle and (3) refuse to even 2-way comm with a pc under repair for
overrun for fear it violates standard procedure for rehab.
The middle course is the correct course in this case. Relax and just be
very sure the pc has been properly rehabbed to free needle on each grade up
to the one one is going to start by demanding the awards of Release that
were granted and if these
weren't ever awarded, then do the rehabs necessary grade by grade. The only
sticky point in this is that if a pc had ever been run on a higher grade
without rehab of a lower, one must rehab "from the top down" at times,
tackling the highest overrun first, but nevertheless doing all of them that
were bypassed eventually.
The way to recognize a free needle is watch for one. When it happens
you will see one. Then you will never afterwards wonder. The free needles
available on a case can all be swallowed up by a failure to rehab all
grades ever bypassed or overrun. If no free needles show up on a case at
all then partially rehab any grade available for rehab back and forth until
one has one of them go free needle and then get a free needle on the
remainder. Life can also be an overrun and a pc never audited will respond
to a rehab of "something overdone." This doesn't mean the pc went release
before Scientology-it means that purpose overrun then jams-rehab of life
situations of overrun consists of hitting the purpose that was overrun and
when this is hit, the pc goes Release in PT and was not a Release in the
past. An example is an overrun located in 20 AD when the person, alert to
Christianity, decided to be good, made it and then overran it for 1945
years. When the purpose was found (to be good) and dated and the overrun
spotted the needle went free. Rough auditing, bad TRs, "letting the pc
itsa," etc., can swallow up free needles. Also a totally ARC Broke meter
that won't read at all with bad indicators all over the place won't record
a read, looks sometimes like a floating needle, the difference being the pc
has total bad indicators-sour, mean, sad, etc. A free needle occurs most
often after a big cognition and the unskilled auditor looks at the pc who
is being bright and interesting and just doesn't see the needle float, asks
more questions and overruns. and the free needle vanishes-when a pc is
cogniting, look at the meter not the pc. And the instant the TA starts up
and the needle goes sticky suspect an overrun and check.
As for doing something else rather than standard procedure for rehab,
plain ignorance can cause it. The auditor's desire to help the pc if
unaccompanied by solid tech background leads to wild efforts, new processes
and anything but cool standard procedure.
When the person checking out pcs is also the Case Supervisor, unusual
solutions creep in. The most errors I've seen made by a Case Supervisor
were made after he had seen the pc or talked with the auditor. Cases have
to be run by report only and auditors have to be supervised and their
sessions listened to by somebody else besides the Case Supervisor. Tech is
tech. There is such a thing as standard tech. Pc wild tales and hollow eyes
and auditor hobbyhorses have to be kept off Case Supervisor lines. So there
must be a person who checks out pcs and supervises auditors and their
auditing performance but who never opens his or her face to suggest
instructions about the pc and only writes down that the auditor is rough or
the process is flat or the process is overrun. The Case Supervisor lives in
an Ivory Tower. Sounds strange but unless it's done that way, wild
departures from standard rehab procedure and from standard tech in general
will occur. Hell, all psychiatry went down that drain- the desperate
patient, the desperate measures. Squirreling stems from the Case Supervisor
being the auditor supervisor and the pc interviewer. Oil, water, being in
two divisions, Commies and Fascists, dogs and cats. won't mix. Neither will
the personal contacter of auditors and pcs and the Case Supervisor ever
successfully stay crossed. The individual practitioner breaks down only
because he does both auditing and case supervision. Auditing is an
organization action which is why today we have field staff members and
HGCs.
Additional notes of things discovered in the investigation of the
plummeted statistic on completions were:
1. Auditors rabbiting out of uncertainty and so stumbling past end
phenomena and floating needles.
2. Case Supervisor getting auditors to ask leading questions on Pr
Pr 2- "Ask the pc if he is interested in Medical Practices."
3. D of P: "Find out what the needle is floating on."
4. Case Supervisor: Told auditor that a floating needle was
not the end phenomenon of a process in which "the TA had to be run
out."
5. Lack of knowledge and understanding of the technology and not
knowing the difference between such things as anaten, secondaries
and engrams by Case Supervisor, D of P. and so confusing auditors.
Of course the one thing one can't technically overcome is an SP keeping
an area messed up. His case doesn't improve because of his intentions and
overts and fear of people getting better or being bigger than he. When an
SP dominates an area, only ethics actions can handle.
The primary indicator of the presence of an SP in an org is a
plummeting statistic immediately after he starts handling a portion of it.
Indifferent leadership, even inaction, can't drive a statistic down.
Only active suppression can.
So watch the statistics and don't get reasonable when they fall. Either
outside the org suppression has been brought down on that portion of the
org. making it PTS or there is an SP there. The final answer is what
happened just before the statistic fell. If a new appointment was made and
it fell, unappoint it fast. If nothing cures the down statistic find the SP
or handle the PTS situation because one or the other is there.
Completions stayed down for 15 years. Then we found auditors never
noticed free needles. Now for heaven's sakes, 15 years was enough. Don't
repeat the error!
It does work you know.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ml.rd.jh.jk
Copyright � 1966, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 FEBRUARY 1966R
Remimeo REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Qual (Revisions in this type style)
All Auditors (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
FREE NEEDLES, HOW TO
GET THEM ON A PC
(Ref: HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA-CAN SQUEEZE
Rev. 15.2.79
HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS
AND AN E-METER
HCOB 3 Sep 78 DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM)
Free needles can be obscured only by overruns and auditor goofs in the
rehab session and ARC breaks in past auditing.
When a TA goes up or is up it means an overrun in life or on a process
or grade of release.
The only place you can't get an overrun is at Grade VII. All grades
below that are subject to overrun.
Life subjects are subject to overrun before Scientology. The mechanism
is this: one conceived a purpose. He or she succeeded in it, then kept on
and overran it. In auditing one hits the purpose and the overrun of it and
gets a free needle on it. That doesn't mean the person was a Release then.
It means that the spotting of the purpose and the overrun by auditing
produces a free needle today.
It may be necessary to find whole track overruns on some pcs in
rehabilitation of grades. If a lot of levels have been run past free needle
it may be necessary to take apart the mess like a bundle of yarn to get the
first free needle. In such a case one rehabs any grade the pc has been run
on that the pc can remember. One handles this briefly until the pc is happy
but not necessarily to free needle. One then finds another overrun, does
the same. One goes on and on looking for moments the pc felt good about
processing at one or another time. If you keep this up, suddenly you will
see a free needle on the pc! Establish what grade it is free on, then
quickly get the needle free on the remaining overrun grades (but not grades
pc was never run on). It may be necessary to take into account a whole
track overrun of a purpose or even the purpose to get Release, Clear or OT.
It is all very quick, deft auditing, very much on procedure using
standard rehab tech-but no repetitive grind.
If you set the sensitivity too low you won't see the free needle
(floating needle) and if you set the sensitivity too high it will obscure
every free needle as the needle is too loose already for the auditor to see
any change. So you always set the sensitivity for each session for a 1/3 of
a dial drop when the pc squeezes the cans and you will be able to easily
recognize free needles when they appear.
Pcs are most apt to go free needle after a big cog. So don't be so
engrossed in looking at the pc during cognitions. Keep an eye on that
needle. And if it goes free, don't ask anything else. Just gently give the
pc a "That's it" and without a chop of comm, ease the pc off to "Declare?"
in Qual. (Or if a field auditor, start the next grade. )
Gently, gently. smooth TRs get you free needles.
A dirty needle is caused by one of three things: 1. The auditor's TRs are
bad. 2. The auditor is breaking the Auditor's Code. 3. The pc has withholds
he does not wish known. If a needle goes dirty in a rehab session, do an
L1C right now and quickly find why.
Rehabs are not a substitute for processes. If a grade hasn't been run.
you can't rehab it of course.
In rehab, never use a new process to cure an overrun. Rehab the process
that was overrun, not new ruds.
And see HCO Pol Ltr 10 Feb 1966 on this subject.
You can get free needles on pcs. It just requires standard TRs,
standard tech. standard rehab and wanting to get one and letting a pc have
one.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ml.rd.jk
Copyright � 1966, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 FEBRUARY 1967
Org Exec REISSUED 22 JULY 1979
Course CORRECTED & REISSUED 4 SEPTEMBER 1979
(HCO PL 12 Feb 67 Admin Know-How
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEADERS
reissued as an HCOB; as well as
existing in HCO PL form.)
ADMIN KNOW-HOW
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEADERS
A few comments on POWER, being or working close to or under a power,
which is to say a leader or one who exerts wide primary influence on the
affairs of men.
I have written it this way, using two actual people to give an example
of magnitude enough to interest and to furnish some pleasant reading. And I
used a military sphere so it could be seen clearly without restimulation of
admin problems.
The book referenced is a fantastically able book by the way.
THE MISTAKES OF SIMON BOLIVAR
AND MANUELA SAENZ
Reference: The book entitled:
The Four Seasons of Manuela by
Victor W. von Hagen, a biography.
A Mayflower Dell Paperback. Oct 1966. 6/-
Simon Bolivar was the liberator of South America from the yoke of
Spain.
Manuela Saenz was the liberatress and consort.
Their acts and fates are well recorded in this moving biography.
But aside from any purely dramatic value the book lays bare and
motivates various actions of great interest to those who lead, who support
or are near leaders.
Simon Bolivar was a very strong character. He was one of the richest
men in South America. He had real personal ability given to only a handful
on the planet. He was a military commander without peer in history. Why he
would fail and die an exile to be later deified is thus of great interest.
What mistakes did he make?
Manuela Saenz was a brilliant, beautiful and able woman. She was loyal,
devoted, quite comparable to Bolivar, far above the cut of average
humanoids. Why then did she live a vilified outcast, receive such violent
social rejection and die of poverty and remain unknown to history? What
mistakes did she make?
BOLIVAR'S ERRORS
The freeing of things is the reverse unstated dramatization (the
opposite side of the coin) to the slavery enjoined by the mechanisms of the
mind.
Unless there is something to free men into, the act of freeing is simply a
protest of slavery. And as no humanoid is free while aberrated in the body
cycle, it is of course a gesture to free him politically as it frees him
only into the anarchy of dramatizing his aberrations with NO control
whatever and without something to fight exterior and with no
exteriorization of his interest he simply goes mad noisily or quietly.
Once as great a wrong as depraving beings has been done there is of
course no freedom short of freeing one from the depravity itself or at
least from its most obvious influences in the society. In short one would
have to de-aberrate a man before his whole social structure could be de-
aberrated.
If one lacked the whole ability to free man wholly from his reactive
patterns, then one could free man from their restimulators in the society
at least. If one had the whole of the data (but lacked the Scientology
tech), one would simply use reactive patterns to blow the old society apart
and then pick up the pieces neatly in a new pattern. If one had no inkling
of how reactive one can get (and Bolivar of course had no knowledge
whatever in that field), there yet remained a workable formula used
"instinctively" by most successful practical political leaders.
If you free a society from those things you see wrong with it and use
force to demand it do what is right, and if you carry forward with decision
and thoroughness, and without continual temporizing you can, in the
applications of your charm and gifts, bring about a great political reform
or improve a failing country.
So Bolivar's first error, most consistent it was, too, was contained in
the vital words "you see" in the above paragraph. He didn't look and he
didn't even listen to sound intelligence reports. He was so sure he could
glow things right or fight things right or charm things right that he never
looked for anything wrong to correct until it was too late. This is the ne-
plus-ultra of personal confidence, amounting to supreme vanity. "When he
appeared it would all come right" was not only his belief but his basic
philosophy. So the first time it didn't work, he collapsed. All his skills
and charm were channeled into this one test. Only that could he observe.
Not to compare with Boliver but to show my understanding of this:
I once had a similar one. "I would keep going as long as I could and
when I was stopped I would then die." This was a solution mild enough to
state and really hard to understand until you had an inkling of what I
meant by keeping going. Meteors keep going-very, very fast. And so did I.
Then one day ages back I finally was stopped after countless little
stoppings by social contacts and family to prepare me culminating in a navy
more devoted to braid than dead enemies and literally I quit. For a while I
couldn't get a clue of what was wrong with me. Life went completely
unlivable until I found a new solution. So I know the frailty of these
single solutions. Not to compare myself but just to show it happens to us
all, not just Bolivars.
Bolivar had no personal insight at all. He could only "outsight" and
even then he did not look or listen. He glowed things right. Pitifully it
was his undoing that he could. Until he no longer could. When he couldn't
glow he roared and when he couldn't roar he fought a battle. Then civic
enemies were not military enemies so he had no solution left at all.
It never occurred to him to do more than personally magnetize things
into being right and victorious.
His downfall was that he made far too heavy use of a skill simply
because it was easy. He was too good at this one thing. So he never looked
to any other skill and he never even dreamed there was any other way.
He had no view of any situation and no idea of the organizational or
preparatory steps necessary to political and personal victory. He only knew
military organization which is where his organizational insight ceased.
He was taught on the high wine of French revolt, notorious in its
organizational inability to form cultures, and that fatally by a childhood
teacher who was intensely impractical in his own private life (Simon
Rodriguez, an unfrocked priest turned tutor).
Bolivar had no personal financial skill. He started wealthy and wound
up a pauper, a statistic descending from one of the, if not the, richest
man in South America down to a borrowed nightshirt to be buried in as an
exile. And this while the property of Royalists was wide open, the greatest
land and mine valuables of South America wide open to his hand and that's
not believable! But true. He never collected his own debt of loans to
governments even when the head of those governments.
So it is no wonder we find two more very real errors leading to his
downfall. He did not get his troops or officers rewarded and he did not aim
for any solvency of the states he controlled. It was all right if there
were long years of battle ahead for them to be unpaid as no real riches
were yet won, but not to reward them when the whole place was at his
disposal! Well!
The limit of his ability consisted of demanding a bit of cash for
current pay from churches-which were not actively against him at first but
which annoyed them no end-and a few household expenses.
He could have (and should have) set aside all Royalist property and
estates for division amongst all officers, their men and his supporters. It
had no owners now. And this failure cost the economy of the country the tax
loss of all those productive estates (the whole wealth of the land). So it
is no wonder his government, its taxable estates now inoperative or at best
lorded by a profiteer or looted by Indians, was insolvent. Also, by failing
to do such an obvious act he delivered property into the hands of more
provident enemies and left his officers and men penniless to finance any
support for their own stability in the new society and so for his own.
As for state finance the great mines of South America, suddenly
ownerless, were overlooked and were then grabbed and worked by foreign
adventurers who simply came in and took them without payment.
Spain had run the country on the finance of mine tithes and general
taxes. Bolivar not only didn't collect the tithes, he let the land become
so worthless as to be untaxable. He should have gotten the estates going by
any shifts and should have state operated all Royalist mines once he had
them. To not do these things was complete, but typically humanoid, folly.
In doing this property division he should have left it all up to
officers' committees operating as courts of claim without staining his own
hands in the natural corruption. He was left doubly open as he not only did
not attend to it, he also got the name of corruption when anybody did grab
something.
He failed as well to recognize the distant widespread nature of his
countries despite all his riding and fighting over them and so sought
tightly centralized government, not only centralizing states but also
centralizing the various nations into a federal state. And this over a huge
land mass full of insurmountable ranges, impassable jungles and deserts and
without mail, telegraph, relay stages, roads, railroads, river vessels or
even foot bridges repaired after a war of attrition.
A step echelon from a pueblo (village) to a state, from a state to a
country and a country to a federal state was only possible in such huge
spaces of country where candidates could never be known personally over any
wide area and whose opinions could not even be circulated more than a few
miles of burro trail, where only the pueblo was democratic and the rest all
appointive from pueblo on up, himself the ratifier of titles if he even
needed that. With his own officers and armies controlling the land as
owners of all wrested from Royalists and the crown of Spain, he would have
had no revolts. There would have been little civil wars of course but a
court to settle their final claims could have existed at federal level and
kept them traveling so much over those vast distances it would have
crippled their enthusiasm for litigation on the one hand and on the other,
by dog eat dog settlements, would have given him the strongest rulers-if he
took neither side.
He did not step out and abdicate a dictatorial position. He mistook
military acclaim and ability for the tool of peace. War only brings
anarchy, so he had anarchy. Peace is more than a "command for unity," his
favorite phrase. A productive peace is getting men busy and giving them
something to make something of that they want to make something of and
telling them to get on with it.
He never began to recognize a suppressive and never considered anyone
needed killing except on a battlefield. There it was glorious. But somebody
destroying his very name and soul, and the security of every supporter and
friend, the SP Santander, his vice-president, who could have been arrested
and executed by a corporal's guard on one one-hundredth of available
evidence, could suborn the whole treasury and population against him,
without Bolivar, continually warned, loaded with evidence, ever even
reprimanding him. And this brought about his loss of popularity and his
eventual exile .
He also failed in the same way to protect his military family or
Manuela Saenz from other enemies. So he weakened his friends and ignored
his enemies just by oversight.
His greatest error lay in that while dismissing Spain he did not
dismiss that nation's most powerful minion, the Church, and did not even
localize it or reward a South American separate branch to loyalty or do
anything at all (except extort money from it) to an organization which
continually worked for Spain as only it could work- on every person in the
land in a direct anti-Bolivar reign of terror behind the scenes. You either
suborn such a group or you take them out when they cease to be universal
and become or are an enemy's partner.
As the Church held huge properties and as Bolivar's troops and
supporters went unpaid even of the penny soldiers' pay, if one was going to
overlook the Royalist estates, one could at least have seized the Church
property and given it to the soldiers. General Vallejo did this in 1835 in
California, a nearly contemporary act, with no catastrophe from Rome. Or
the penniless countries could have taken them over. You don't leave an
enemy financed and solvent while you let your friends starve in a game like
South American politics. Oh no.
He wasted his enemies. He exported the "godos" or defeated Royalist
soldiers. They mostly had no homes but South America. He issued no
amnesties they could count on. They were shipped off or left to die in the
"ditch"-the best artisan in the country among them.
When one (General Rodil) would not surrender Calloa fortress after Peru
was won, Bolivar after great gestures of amnesty failed to obtain surrender
and then fought the fort. Four thousand political refugees and four
thousand Royalist troops died over many months in full sight of Lima,
fought heavily by Bolivar only because the fort was fighting. But Bolivar
had to straighten up Peru urgently not fight a defeated enemy. The right
answer to such a foolish commander as Rodil as Bolivar did have the troops
to do it, was to cover the roads with cannon enfilade potential to
discourage any sortie from the fort, put a large number of his own troops
in a distant position of offense but ease and comfort and say, "We're not
going to fight. The war's over, silly man. Look at the silly fellows in
there, living on rats when they can just walk out and sleep home nights or
go to Spain or enlist with me or just go camping," and let anybody walk in
and out who pleased, making the fort Commander (Rodil) the prey of every
pleading wife and mother without and would-be deserter or mutineer within
until he did indeed sheepishly give up the pretense-a man cannot fight
alone. But battle was glory to Bolivar. And he became intensely disliked
because the incessant cannonade which got nowhere was annoying.
Honors meant a great deal to Bolivar. To be liked was his life. And it
probably meant more to him than to see things really right. He never
compromised his principles
but he lived on admiration, a rather sickening diet since it demands in
turn continuous "theatre." One is what one is, not what one is admired or
hated for. To judge oneself by one's successes is simply to observe that
one's postulates worked and breeds confidence in one's ability. To have to
be told it worked only criticizes one's own eyesight and hands a spear to
the enemy to make his wound of vanity at his will. Applause is nice. It's
great to be thanked and admired. But to work only for that? And his craving
for that, his addiction to the most unstable drug in history-fame- killed
Bolivar. That self offered spear. He told the world continually how to kill
him- reduce its esteem. So as money and land can buy any quantity of
cabals, he could be killed by curdling the esteem, the easiest thing you
can get a mob to do.
He had all the power. He did not use it for good or evil. One cannot
hold power and not use it. It violates the power formula. For it then
prevents others from doing things if they had some of the power so they
then see as their only solution the destruction of the holder of the power
as he, not using power or delegating it, is the unwitting block to all
their plans. So even many of his friends and armies finally agreed he had
to go. They were not able men. They were in a mess. But bad or good they
had to do something. Things were desperate, broken down and starving after
14 years of civil war. Therefore they either had to have some of that
absolute power or else nothing could be done at all. They were not great
minds. He did not need any "great minds," he thought, even though he
invited them verbally. He saw their petty, often murderous solutions and he
rebuked them. And so held the power and didn't use it.
He could not stand another personality threat.
The trouble in Peru came when he bested its real conqueror (from the
Argentine), La Mar, in a petty triumph over adding Guayaquil to Columbia.
Bolivar wished to look triumphant again and didn't notice it really cost
him the support and Peru the support of La Mar-who understandably resigned
and went home, leaving Bolivar Peru to conquer. Unfortunately, it had
already been in his hands. La Mar needed some troops to clean up a small
Royalist army that was all. La Mar didn't need Peru's loss of Guayaquil-
which never did anybody any real good anyway!
Bolivar would become inactive when faced with two areas' worth of
problems-he did not know which way to go. So he did nothing.
Brave beyond any general in history on the battlefield, the Andes or in
torrential rivers, he did not really have the bravery needed to trust
inferior minds and stand by their often shocking blunders. He feared their
blunders. So he did not dare unleash his many willing hounds.
He could lead men, make men feel wonderful, make men fight and lay down
their lives after hardships no army elsewhere in the world has ever faced
before or since. But he could not use men even when they were begging to be
used.
It is a frightening level of bravery to use men you know can be cruel,
vicious, and incompetent. He had no fear of their turning on him ever. When
they finally did only then he was shocked. But he protected "the people"
from authority given to questionably competent men. So he really never used
but three or four generals of mild disposition and enormously outstanding
ability. And to the rest he denied power. Very thoughtful of the nebulous
"people" but very bad indeed for the general good. And it really caused his
death.
No. Bolivar was theatre. It was all theatre. One cannot make such
errors and still pretend that one thinks of life as life, red-blooded and
factual. Real men and real life are full of dangerous, violent, live
situations and wounds hurt and starvation is desperation itself especially
when you see it in one you love.
This mighty actor, backed up with fantastic personal potential, made
the mistake of thinking the theme of liberty and his own great role upon
the stage was enough to interest all the working, suffering hours of men,
buy their bread, pay their whores,
shoot their wives' lovers and bind their wounds or even put enough drama
into very hard pressed lives to make them want to live it.
No, Bolivar was unfortunately the only actor on the stage and no other
man in the world was real to him.
And so he died. They loved him. But they were also on the stage too,
where they were dying in his script or Rousseau's script for liberty but no
script for living their very real lives.
He was the greatest military general in any history measured against
his obstacles, the people and the land across which he fought.
And he was a complete failure to himself and his friends.
While being one of the greatest men alive at that. So we see how truly
shabby others in leaders' boots amongst men must be.
MANUELA SAENZ
The tragedy of Manuela Saenz as Bolivar's mistress was that she was
never used, never really had a share and was neither protected nor honored
by Bolivar
Here was a clever, spectacular woman of fantastic fidelity and skill,
with an enormous "flaire," capable of giving great satisfaction and
service. And only her satisfaction ability was taken and that not
consistently nor even honestly.
In the first place, Bolivar never married her. He never married
anybody. This opened up a fantastic breach in any defense she could ever
make against her or his enemies who were legion. So her first mistake was
in not in some way contriving a marriage.
That she had an estranged husband she had been more or less sold to was
permitted by her to wreck her life obliquely.
She was too selfless to be real in all her very able plotting.
For this marriage problem she could have engineered any number of
actions.
She had the solid friendship of all his trusted advisers, even his old
tutor. Yet she arranged nothing for herself.
She was utterly devoted, completely brilliant and utterly incapable of
really bringing off an action of any final kind.
She violated the power formula in not realizing that she had power.
Manuela was up against a hard man to handle. But she did not know
enough to make her own court effective. She organized one. She did not know
what to do with it.
Her most fatal mistake was in not bringing down Santander, Bolivar's
chief enemy. That cost her everything she had before the end and after
Bolivar died. She knew for years Santander had to be killed. She said it or
wrote it every few days. Yet never did she promise some young officer a
nice night or a handful of gold to do it in a day when dueling was in
fashion. It's like standing around discussing how the plainly visible wolf
in the garden that's eating the chickens must be shot, even holding a gun,
and never even lifting it while all one's chickens vanish for years.
In a land overridden with priests she never got herself a tame priest
to bring about her ends.
She was a fantastic intelligence officer. But she fed her data to a man who
could not act to protect himself or friends, who could only fight armies
dramatically.
She did not see this and also quietly take on the portfolio of secret
police chief. Her mistake was waiting to be asked-to be asked to come to
him, to act. She voluntarily was his best political intelligence agent.
Therefore she should have also assumed further roles.
She guarded his correspondence, was intimate with his secretaries. And
yet she never collected or forged or stole any document to bring down
enemies either through representations to Bolivar or a court circle of her
own. And in an area with that low an ethic, that's fatal.
She openly pamphleteered and fought violently as in a battle against
her rabble.
She had a great deal of money at her disposal. In a land of for-sale
Indians she never used a penny to buy a quick knife or even a solid piece
of evidence.
When merely opening her lips she could have had any sequestrated
Royalist estate she went to litigation for a legitimate legacy never won
and another won but never paid.
They lived on the edge of quicksand. She never bought a plank or a
rope.
Carried away by the glory of it all, devoted completely, potentially
able and a formidable enemy, she did not act.
She waited to be told to come to him even when he lay dying and exiled.
His command over her who never obeyed any other was too absolute for
his own or her survival.
Her assigned mistakes (pointed out at the time as her caprice and play
acting) were not her errors. They only made her interesting. They were far
from fatal.
She was not ruthless enough to make up for his lack of ruthlessness and
not provident enough to make up for his lack of providence.
The ways open to her for finance, for action, were completely doorless.
The avenue stretched out to the horizon.
She fought bravely but she just didn't take action.
She was an actress for the theatre alone.
And she died of it. And she let Bolivar die because of it.
Never once did Manuela look about and say, "See here, things mustn't go
this wrong. My lover holds half a continent and even I hold the loyalty of
battalions. Yet that woman threw a fish!"
Never did Manuela tell Bolivar's doctor, a rumoured lover, "Tell that
man he will not live without my becoming a constant part of his entourage,
and tell him until he believes it or we'll have a new physician around
here."
The world was open. Where Theodosius, the wife of Emperor Justinian II
of Constantinople, a mere circus girl and a whore, ruled harder than her
husband but for her husband behind his back-and made him marry her as well,
Manuela never had any bushel basket of gold brought in to give Bolivar for
his unpaid troops with a "Just found it, dear" to his "Where on Earth . . .
?" after the Royalist captives had been carefully ransomed for gaol escapes
by her enterprising own entourage and officer friends. She never handed
over any daughter of a family clamoring against her to Negro troops and
then said, "Which over-verbal family is next?"
She even held a colonel's rank but only used it because she wore man's
clothing afternoons. It was a brutal, violent, ruthless land, not a game of
musical chairs.
And so Manuela, penniless, improvident, died badly and in poverty,
exiled by enemies and deserted by her friends.
But why not deserted by her friends? They had all been poverty-stricken
to a point quite incapable of helping her even though they wanted to-for
she once had the power to make them solvent. And didn't use it. They were
in poverty before they won but they did eventually control the land. After
that why make it a bad habit?
And so we see two pathetic, truly dear, but tinsel figures, both on a
stage, both far removed from the reality of it all.
And one can say, "But if they had not been such idealists they never
would have fought so hard and freed half a continent," or "If she had
stooped to such intrigue or he had been known for violent political actions
they would never have had the strength and never would have been loved."
All very idealistic itself. They died "in the ditch" unloved, hated and
despised, two decent brave people, almost too good for this world.
A true hero, a true heroine. But on a stage and not in life.
Impractical and improvident and with no faintest gift either one to use the
power they could assemble.
This story of Bolivar and Manuela is a tragedy of the most piteous
kind.
They fought a hidden enemy, the Church; they were killed by their
friends.
But don't overlook how impractical it is not to give your friends power
enough when you have it to give. You can always give some of it to another
if the first one collapses through inability. And one can always be brought
down like a hare at a hunt who seeks to use the delegated power to kill you-
if you have the other friends
Life is not a stage for posturing and "Look at me!" "Look at me." "Look
at me." If one is to lead a life of command or a life near to command one
must handle it as life. Life bleeds. It suffers. It hungers. And it has to
have the right to shoot its enemies until such time as comes a golden age.
Aberrated man is not capable of supporting in his present state, a
golden declared age for three minutes, given all the tools and wealth of
the world.
If one would live a life of command or one near to a command, one must
then accumulate power as fast as possible and delegate it as quickly as
feasible and use every humanoid in long reach to the best and beyond his
talents if one is to live at all.
If one does not choose to live such a life then go on the stage and be
a real actor. Don't kill men while pretending it isn't real. Or one can
become a recluse or a student or a clerk. Or study butterflies or take up
tennis.
For one is committed to certain irrevocable natural laws the moment one
starts out upon a conquest, either as the man in charge or a person near to
him or on his staff or in his army. And the foremost law, if one's ambition
is to win, is of course to win.
But also to keep on providing things to win and enemies to conquer.
Bolivar let his cycle run to "freedom" and end there He never had
another plan beyond that point He ran out of territory to free Then he
didn't know what to do with it and didn't know enough, either, to find
somewhere else to free But of course all limited games come to end. And
when they do their players fall over on the field and become rag dolls
unless somebody at least tells them the game has ended and they have no
more game nor any dressing room or houses but just that field.
And they lie upon the field, not noticing there can be no more game since
the other team has fled and after a bit they have to do something and if
the leader and his consort are sitting over on the grass being rag dolls
too, of course there isn't any game. And so the players start fighting
amongst themselves just to have a game And if the leader then says, "No,
no" and his consort doesn't say, "Honey, you better phone the Baltimore
Orioles for Saturday," then of course the poor players, bored stiff, say,
"He's out." "She's out." "Now we're going to split the team in half and
have a game."
And that's what happened to Bolivar and Manuela. They had to be gotten
rid of for there was no game and they didn't develop one to play while
forbidding the only available game-minor civil wars.
A whole continent containing the then major mines of the world, whole
populations were left sitting there, "freed." But none owned any of it
though the former owners had left. They weren't given it. Nor were they
made to manage it. No game.
And if Bolivar had not been smart enough for that he could at least
have said, "Well! You monkeys are going to have quite a time getting the
wheels going but that's not my job. You decide on your type of government
and what it's to be. Soldiers are my line. Now I'm taking over those old
estates of mine and the Royalist ones near by and the emerald mines just as
souvenirs and me and Manuela we're going home." And he should have said
that 5 minutes after the last Royalist army was defeated in Peru.
And his official family with him, and a thousand troops to which he was
giving land would have moved right off smartly with him. And the people
after a few screams of horror at being deserted would have fallen on each
other, sabered a state together here and a town there and gotten busy out
of sheer self protection in a vital new game, "Who's going to be Bolivar
now?"
Then when home he should have said, "Say those nice woods look awfully
Royalist to me, and also those 1,000,000 hectares of grazing land, Manuela.
Its owner once threw a Royalist fish, remember? So that's yours."
And the rest of the country would have done the same and gotten on with
the new game of "You was a Royalist."
And Bolivar and Manuela would have had statues built to them by the TON
at once as soon as agents could get to Paris with orders from an adoring
populace.
"Bolivar, come rule us!" should have gotten an "I don't see any unfree
South America. When you see a French or Spanish army coming, come back and
tell me."
That would have worked. And this poor couple would have died suitably
adored in the sanctity of glory and (perhaps more importantly) in their own
beds, not "in a ditch."
And if they had had to go on ruling they could have declared a new game
of "Pay the soldiers and officers with Royalist land." And when that was a
gone game, "Oust the Church and give its land to the poor friendly
Indians."
You can't stand bowing back of the footlights forever with no show even
if you are quite an actor. Somebody else can make better use of any stage
than even the handsomest actor who will not use it.
Man is too aberrated to understand at least 7 things about power:
1. Life is lived by lots of people. And if you lead you must either let
them get on with it or lead them on with it actively.
2. When the game or the show is over, there must be a new game or a new
show. And if there isn't somebody else is jolly well going to start one
and if you won't let anyone do it the game will become "getting you."
3. If you have power use it or delegate it or you sure won't have
it long.
4. When you have people use them or they will soon become most unhappy
and you won't have them any more.
5. When you move off a point of power, pay all your obligations on the
nail, empower all your friends completely and move off with your
pockets full of artillery, potential blackmail on every erstwhile
rival, unlimited funds in your private account and the addresses of
experienced assassins and go live in Bulgravia and bribe the police.
And even then you may not live long if you have retained one scrap of
domination in any camp you do not now control or if you even say, "I
favour Politician Jiggs." Abandoning power utterly is dangerous indeed.
But we can't all be leaders or figures strutting in the limelight and
so there's more to know about this:
6. When you're close to power get some delegated to you, enough to do
your job and protect yourself and your interests, for you can be shot,
fellow, shot, as the position near power is delicious but dangerous,
dangerous always, open to the taunts of any enemy of the power who dare
not really boot the power but can boot you. So to live at all in the
shadow or employ of a power you must yourself gather and USE enough
power to hold your own-without just nattering to the power to "kill
Pete," in straightforward or more suppressive veiled ways to him as
these wreck the power that supports yours. He doesn't have to know all
the bad news and if he's a power really he won't ask all the time,
"What are all those dead bodies doing at the door?" And if you are
clever, you never let it be thought HE killed them-that weakens you and
also hurts the power source. "Well, boss, about all those dead bodies,
nobody at all will suppose you did it. She over there, those pink legs
sticking out, didn't like me." "Well," he'll say if he really is a
power, "why are you bothering me with it if it's done and you did it.
Where's my blue ink?" Or "Skipper, three shore patrolmen will be along
soon with your cook, Dober, and they'll want to tell you he beat up
Simson." "Who's Simson?" "He's a clerk in the enemy office downtown."
"Good, when they've done it, take Dober down to the dispensary for any
treatment he needs. Oh yes. Raise his pay." Or "Sir, could I have the
power to sign divisional orders?" "Sure."
7. And lastly and most important, for we all aren't on the stage with
our names in lights, always push power in the direction of anyone on
whose power you depend. It may be more money for the power, or more
ease, or a snarling defense of the power to a critic, or even the dull
thud of one of his enemies in the dark, or the glorious blaze of the
whole enemy camp as a birthday surprise.
If you work like that and the power you are near or depend upon is a
power that has at least some inkling about how to be one, and if you make
others work like that, then the power-factor expands and expands and
expands and you too acquire a sphere of power bigger than you would have if
you worked alone. Real powers are developed by tight conspiracies of this
kind pushing someone up in whose leadership they have faith. And if they
are right and also manage their man and keep him from collapsing through
overwork, bad temper or bad data, a kind of juggernaut builds up. Don't
ever feel weaker because you work for somebody stronger. The only failure
lies in taxing or pulling down the strength on which you depend. All
failures to remain a power's power are failures to contribute to the
strength and longevity of the work, health and power of that power.
Devotion requires active contribution outwards from the power as well as
in.
If Bolivar and Manuela had known these things they would have lived an
epic, not a tragedy. They would not have "died in the ditch," he bereft of
really earned praise for his real accomplishments even to this day. And
Manuela would not be unknown even in the archives of her country as the
heroine she was.
Brave, brave figures. But if this can happen to such stellar personalities
gifted with ability tenfold over the greatest of other mortals, to people
who could take a rabble in a vast impossible land and defeat one of Earth's
then foremost powers, with no money or arms, on personality alone, what
then must be the ignorance and confusion of human leaders in general, much
less little men stumbling through their lives of boredom and suffering?
Let us wise them up, huh? You can't live in a world where even the
great leaders can't lead.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.rd.gal
Copyright � 1967, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 MAY 1969RB
REVISED 21 JULY 1978
Remimeo RE-REVISED 5 OCTOBER 1978
New Era Dn RE-REVISED 14 NOVEMBER 1978
Checksheet
(Revisions in this type style)
DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES
PRIOR ASSESSING
Those cases which have been long and habitually on drugs, medicine and
alcohol sometimes suffer from a "SOMATIC SHUT-OFF." They appear
anaesthetized (unfeeling) and sometimes have "nothing troubling them"
whereas they are on drugs, drink or medicine and are in reality in a
suppressed physical condition and cannot cease to take drugs or drink or
medicine.
One can find, in such a case, a very high TA which doesn't seem to
reduce. The TA can be brought down by auditing the drug and alcohol engrams
as a chain.
Any such case took up drugs, alcohol or medicine because of unwanted
pain or sensation or misemotion. You can use that as a stable datum which
resolves the situation.
All it requires is a special assessment called a PRIOR ASSESSMENT. For
the person looked on drugs, alcohol or medicine as a cure for unwanted
feelings. One has to assess what was wrong before or prior to the cure.
(NOTE: Prior assessment is done after narrative running and
preassessment with R3RA running of the drug, medicine or alcohol.)
Using the drug list obtained on the Original Assessment, take up the
largest reading this lifetime drug, medicine or alcohol and ask the pc the
following preassessment question:
"Prior to taking (the drug, medicine or alcohol) were there
(preassessment item)?"
Take the largest reading item from the preassessment and ask the pc:
"What (item) did you have prior to taking (the drug, medicine or
alcohol)?"
Continue with a full handling of the preassessment per HCOB 18 Jun 78R,
New Era Dianetics Series 4R, ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM and HCOB 15
Jul 71RB, New Era Dianetics Series 9RA, DRUG HANDLING.
In doing this assessment, you must grab the read and mark it plainly as
it occurs. If you just list and then go over the list the person may be
back in present time and, as these are now cut off by the masses of drug or
alcohol engrams on top of them, they won't read again. So you must catch
the read as the person first mentions it.
You choose the longest read and find and run the chain by R3RA as in
any other New Era Dianetics auditing.
The only difference is the assessment time period. You are listing for
a time before they went on drugs, alcohol, or medicine.
The above prior assessment steps are done on each drug, medicine or alcohol
that has read. They are handled in order of largest read. (Ref: HCOB 15 Jun
78R, NED Series 9RA, DRUG HANDLING.)
The running out of the chain of unwanted feelings they had before going
on drugs or alcohol or medicine removes the reason they started taking
drugs, or medicine, smoking marijuana or drinking. The compulsion to still
use drugs or drink is lessened and they can come off it.
This can also be used as a working rule to get earlier than any
"curative" activity. Almost anything which comes later is a cure for
something earlier. It could be said that the present time being is a
compound of past cures. To handle, the action would be the same as for
drugs, alcohol, or medicine. Preassess the unwanted pains or feelings
before the cure and run the longest reads by R3RA.
As there will be more than one chain involved, you of course take your
next longest read and run that next, just as in any assessment.
The general term for this type of assessment is PRIOR assessing, not
because it is done before auditing but to determine what the pc was
suffering from before he used a harmful "cure."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:an.rd.lfg.mdf.dr
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 25 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class VIII
Class VIIIs
Class VIII (Revisions in this type style)
C/S Book (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY
Sickness is of course the result of engram chains in restimulation.
One has to ask, however, what causes restimulation to occur?
The answer is out-ruds plus a suppressive environment or situation.
Therefore, obviously, if one wanted to really handle handle handle
sickness and do some miracles, one would use the lot of one's weapons.
Don't mistake that Dianetics (HCOB 24 July 1969R SERIOUSLY ILL PCS) can
all by itself practically bring the dead to life to all intents and
purposes and it can be used all by itself.
However, when that doesn't work completely, then the Class VIII Case
Supervisor and well-trained Scientology auditors can step in.
Let us examine the basic full dress parade routine of what Scientology
and Dianetics could be used.
1. Put in life ruds (as given below).
2. 3 S & Ds.
3. Narrative handling and full preassessment on the sick area, run
Triple or Quad, plus other Dianetic Assist actions and any needed
medical treatment. (See HCOB 2 April 69RA, Rev. 28.7.78, DIANETIC
ASSISTS, which cautions against overwhelming a sick pc with too
much restim.)
4. NED for OTs (on OT III and above).
Obviously this illness hasn't a chance at all. It disappears in 1. Or
in 2. Or in 3. Or in 4....
The system is obvious. You take away the current out-ruds and the
illness can destimulate. You take away the suppressions and destimulation
is more positive.
You erase all the engrams and the source is gone.
You do the second, . . . third, and zero flows and the overts and
sympathies are also vanished.
On ruds alone you can of course get a recurrence.
You also risk a recurrence on the S & Ds.
The motivators go on the engram chains.
The overts and sympathy for like illness goes on the second, . . .
third and zero
LIFE RUDS
As the person with out-ruds makes no real gain it is wise to put ruds
in "In life."
This is done with
"In life have you had an ARC break?"
"In life have you had a problem?"
"In life have you had a withhold?"
If the person has had much auditing you ask after each of the "In life"
questions "Was that present in an auditing session?"
S & Ds
The full parade for three S & Ds (as given in HCOB 19 January 1968 in
the Class VIII pack) is as follows:
3 item S & D
Fly a rud.
Assess
Withdraw from
Stop
Unmock
Suppress
Invalidate
Make nothing of
Suggest
Been careful of
Fail to reveal
Take the 3 that read best (null to 3 items). Use the one that read most
first.
Test one of these items in these two questions to see which question
then reads best.
"Who or what has attempted to you?"
"Who or what have you tried to ?"
List the best reading question by the laws of listing and nulling. BE
EXACT IN FOLLOWING THOSE LAWS or you'll make the person even sicker!
Use each of the 3 this way.
Prepcheck any item that does not F/N until it F/Ns or proves not to be
the correct one in which event correct the list. If the list item does not
F/N on being found and indicated, you prepcheck it to F/N.
DIANETICS
The New Era Dianetics HCOBs fully cover assists and Dianetic handling
of body problems and illnesses.
This rundown is what could be known as beating an illness to death.
Handling it medically and spiritually should bring home a winner every
time.
This full approach is recommended only when one has encountered a resistive
situation.
Very often a Dianetic Assist precedes all this.
Usually the Dianetic handling is done without the ruds or S & Ds.
But when you have somebody whose "lumbosis" has not surrendered to
Dianetics, you have this full approach to fall back on.
It's nice to have a full arsenal.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ldm.ei.rd.rk
Copyright � 1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1970RB
REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Checksheet (Revisions not printed in a different type style)
Class VI
Checksheet
Class IV Grad
Auditors GREEN FORM
C/Ses
The Green Form is used to detect the peculiarities and elements of a
pc's life which are causing case trouble or preventing gains. (It is not
used to cure high or low TA.)
You can assess it Method 3 and handle, not going beyond the first F/N,
but its real use is Method 5 and send to the C/S for programming.
It can also be used in combination with the Expanded Green Form 40RD to
precisely locate and solve any resistiveness of a pc's case.
Directions for use of the Green Form and the Expanded Green Form 40RD
are given in HCOB 8 December 78 11, GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM
40RD, USE OF. It is vital, before using these lists, that any auditor or
C/S first checks out on the above issue.
PC NAME: DATE:_______________
AUDITOR: ______________________________________
1A. HAVE YOU NOT HAD SUFFICIENT SLEEP? _________
1B. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY TIRED? _________
1C. HAVE YOU NOT HAD ENOUGH FOOD? _________
1D. ARE YOU HUNGRY? _________
1E. HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________
IF. HAVE YOU TAKEN ASPIRIN? _________
1G. HAVE YOU TAKEN TRANQUILIZERS? _________
1H. HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS? _________
Do not audit a pc who has not had sufficient food or rest or who has
taken aspirin or drugs. If one of the above questions reads, assess no
further; take the question up with the pc. If he is tired, send him
home to rest, if he is hungry, send him to get well fed, and if he has
taken drugs, he will have to dry out for the time specified in HCOB 17
Oct 69RA, DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS.
2A. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING? _________
If the pc is Clear, Dianetic Clear or OT and has not had an Int RD, do
the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series 4R. Do not run any
Dianetics. Otherwise, if the pc has never had an Int RD, give him a
standard Int RD per Int Series 2.
2B. HAS YOUR INT RD BEEN MESSED UP? _________
Do an Int RD Correction List Revised (HCOB 29 Oct 71RA). If Int
Correction has already been done on the pc get an FES of the Int RD and
its corrections. When all errors are corrected the C/S may order the
End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series 4R.
3. HAS THERE BEEN A LIST ERROR? _________
Find out which and handle with an L4BRA.
4A. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
Handle with ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.
4B. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK WITH THE ENVIRONMENT? _________
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N or Remedy B if ordered by the C/S. (Ref: BTB 14
Aug 68R, REMEDY B-ENVIRONMENT AND "NEW STYLE.")
4C. DO YOU HAVE A PRESENT TIME PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
4D. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? _________
Get what, who nearly found out, what they did to miss it, E/S M/W/H to
F/N.
4E. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _________
Who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate it was a false
read. 2WC the concern.
4F. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT? _________
Pull it, E/S to F/N.
5. ARE YOU EXPERIMENTING? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
6. ARE YOU ALTERING TECH? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
7. ARE YOU DOING SOMETHING ELSE WITH TECH? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
8. HAVE YOU TYPED, HANDWRITTEN OR TAPED COPIES OF ANY CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIALS? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
9. ARE YOU HERE TO GET DATA FOR SOMEONE ELSE? _________
Get what, when, all, who E/S to F/N.
10. DO YOU HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD OR CRIMES FOR WHICH YOU COULD BE
ARRESTED? _________
Note all crimes, with what, when, all and who and handle with E/S to
F/N.
11. ARE YOU HERE TO BE CURED OF SOMETHING NOT MENTIONED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
12. DO YOU HAVE UNPAID DEBTS TO ORGS? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
13. DO YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF A CRIME AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY? _________
Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.
14. ARE THERE IGNORED ORIGINATIONS? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
15. HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING! _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or L1C on the prior upset. If prior upset was in
auditing, use the appropriate correction list.
16A HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED BY A NONSTANDARD AUDITOR? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
16B. HAS THERE BEEN A NONSTANDARD PROCESS? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
16C. HAS THERE BEEN A BAD AUDITING COMM CYCLE? Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
_________
L1C if necessary.
16D HAVE THERE BEEN CODE BREAKS? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
17A IS THERE AN ENGRAM IN RESTIMULATION? _________
L3RF and handle. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the
read. You may do an L3RF if needed, however. do no handling beyond
indicating the read. See HCOB 30 Oct 78 C/S Series 53, USE OF for
further data on handling reading Dianetic items on Clears, OTs and
Dianetic Clears.)
17B. IS A PICTURE NOT ERASED? _________
Handle as in 17A above.
18. IS THERE AN ENGRAM EXACTLY MATCHING PT DANGERS? _________
Run it out Triple or Quad. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears,
handle as in 17A above.)
19. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON? _________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further handling if
needed.
20. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP? _________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further handling if
needed.
21. IS THERE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MENACE? _________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S.
22. ARE YOU HERE BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE DEMANDED IT? _________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S.
23A. DO YOU HAVE A HIDDEN STANDARD? _________
L&N "What hasn't been handled?"
L&N "Who or what would have (item above) ?"
Run O/W on the item.
23B. WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR YOU TO KNOW SCIENTOLOGY WORKS?
_________
Handle as in 23A above.
24. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF SCIENTOLOGY WORKED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
25. CAN'T YOU STUDY? _________
Assess and handle a Study Green Form.
26. HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
27. HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
28. HAS ANYTHING BEEN EVALUATED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
29. HAS ANYTHING BEEN RUSHED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
30. HAS ANYTHING BEEN MISSED? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
31. HAS A PROCESS BEEN LEFT UNFLAT? _________
2WC for data to F/N. Return to C/S.
32. HAS A PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN? _________
Rehab.
33. HAS A RELEASE BEEN BYPASSED? _________
Rehab.
34. HAVE YOU BEEN OVERREPAIRED? _________
Repair Correction List.
35. HAVE YOU GONE DIANETIC CLEAR? _________
Date/Locate.
36. IS THERE ANYTHING UPSETTING ABOUT THIS REVIEW? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
37. IS THIS LIST UNNECESSARY? _________
Indicate. If no F/N rehab or Date/Locate.
38. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED? _________
Find out what and handle or return to the C/S.
39. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
Find out what and handle or return to C/S.
RESISTIVE CASES ASSESSMENT
Assess Method 5 the following resistive cases. If any item reads, go to
its corresponding section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD and assess Method
5 all the items in that section. Assess the section on the Expanded Green
Form 40RD that corresponds to each reading item.
When all sections corresponding to the reading resistive cases items
are assessed you will have a full picture of the pc's resistiveness.
Then, if you have C/S okay, take up each reading section on the EXGF
40RD in the order in which they are listed below and handle reads per the
instructions given.
Otherwise, return to the C/S for programming.
A-1. WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED _________
A-2. HAD ENGRAMS RUN AFTER BEING DIANETIC CLEAR _________
B. DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _________
C. AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT _________
D. OVERWHELMED _________
E. CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _________
F-1. SUPPRESSED _________
F-2. CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON _________
G. SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL _________
H. HAS NOT HAD AUDITING _________
I-1. SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________
I-2. HAS TAKEN DRUGS _________
J. FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY _________
K. HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES _________
L-1. OUT OF VALENCE _________
L-2. ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE _________
M. PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED _________
N. AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _________
O. MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING _________
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright (c) 1970, 1974, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1970R
Remimeo REVISED 23 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class IV
Grad (Revisions in this type style)
C/Ses
Tech Secs (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Qual Secs
Interiorization Rundown Series 6
AUDITING PAST EXTERIOR
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2, EXTERIOR
IZATION AND HIGH TA, THE
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN
REVISED
HCOB 24 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 4, URGENT
IMPORTANT, THE END OF END
LESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series
Issue II 6RA, URGENT IMPORTANT,
ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS
HCOB 7 Mar 75 EXT AND ENDING SESSION.)
On Flag where we do a lot of auditing on pcs when I took over C/Sing
after 8 months off C/S lines, I found a very high percentage of cases had
been audited past exterior. It was a very high percentage.
Many of these pcs (most of them VAs or on OT levels) had various
symptoms:
Headaches Body aches and pains Effort Pressures from environment.
The common denominator was "audited over exterior."
The main symptom of this was high TA at session start or TA up at
Examiner after F/Ns, cog, VGIs at session end. Not all however suffered
from high TA but all who had high TA after lots of auditing had been
audited past exterior.
The first (1970) version of the above-referenced HCOB (now HCOB 4 Jan
71R) re exteriorization and interiorization was tested and written as the
breakthrough which permits auditing after exteriorization and going on up
the grades.
The check even after this showed such a high percent of cases had been
audited past exterior on Dianetics, Scn, Power, Clearing or OT grades that
I wish to bring the point home emphatically to C/Ses that it is of major
importance to handle this situation by checking for it and running
interiorization.
NOTE: Per HCOB 12 Sep 78, URGENT IMPORTANT, DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON
CLEARS AND OTs, Clears and OTs and Dianetic Clears would not now be audited
on the routine Interiorization RD (Int RD Series 2), as they are not to be
run on Dianetics. Dianetic Clears, Clears and above may be audited on the
End of Endless Int Repair RD, which runs Int by Recall. (Ref: HCOB 24 Sep
78, Issue I, Int RD Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF ENDLESS INT
REPAIR RD.) A C/ear or OT who then has any further unresolving Int problems
should, as soon as possible, be handled at an AO.
The standard C/S for any other pc who has exteriorized in auditing, has
high TA, headaches, body aches, heavy pressures or discomfort (any of
these), is to order a check on interiorization, exactly per the steps given
on HCOB 4 Jan 71R,
EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED. Then, if
Int is found to be charged, the person is given the Int Rundown.
When the Int Rundown steps are completed, in a separate session some
time within the next few days, this C/S must be done:
1. Two-way comm on interiorization and exteriorization.
This pushes the cognition further. The pc may not have added it all up
yet. Don't evaluate. Just question and listen with no Q and A.
Pcs or pre-OTs can go up to higher grades after exteriorization if
interiorization is run. This is even true of Dianetic Clears. For Clears,
OTs and Dianetic Clears, however, Int can only be run using the End of
Endless Int Repair RD as referenced above.
We are far more successful in early auditing (such as Dianetics and
lower grades) than we think!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ei.rd.kjm
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MAY 1970R
REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Class IV Grad (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheets
Tech/Qual (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
All Auditors
C/Ses
Interiorization Rundown Series 7
BLOWS
AUDITING PAST EXTERIOR
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2, EXTERIOR
IZATION AND HIGH TA, THE
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED
HCOB 24 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 4, URGENT
IMPORTANT, END OF ENDLESS
INT REPAIR RD
HCOB 7 Mar 75 EXT AND ENDING SESSION)
I have found a major cause of blows from classes, orgs and Scientology.
Overts are of course a primary cause but many have overts and don't
blow, so why do such people blow?
A case audited past exterior, particularly if it is not acked, tends to
get stuck on exteriorizing. This can (but doesn't always by any means)
cause the person to take himself away!
Three recent "blows" all fell in this category. One who was trying to
blow, when audited on interiorization, changed his mind.
An amazing number of pcs go exterior on modern auditing. Modern
processes, Dianetics and Scientology are very fast.
Some haven't even realized it, didn't know what it was.
When they go exterior and you keep on auditing them without running
interiorization as per HCOB 4 Jan 71R, Int RD Series 2, EXTERIORIZATION AND
HIGH TA, THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED, they become stronger as
thetans while being reinteriorized and they get odd somatics, particularly
in the head.
Uncomfortable they want OUT. Trying and failing to get out (since
interiorization has not been run) in desperation they leave an org or
class, body and all, without being exterior as a thetan.
If you rehab exterior and run an Interiorization Rundown the
dramatization ceases.
The excuses such "blows" give you would fill a large book. Yet it is
only that they are seeking to exteriorize, can't, so they "exteriorize" by
leaving, body and all.
The Interiorization Rundown is given in HCOB 4 Jan 71R.
For Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, the handling is the End of Endless
Int Repair Rundown. (HCOB 24 Sep 78, Issue I.)
A person couldn't be audited past exterior, you know.
But if given an Interiorization Rundown he or she can be.
When they have been audited past exterior without an Interiorization
Rundown you will have trouble with the case, the TA and with blows. So use
the interiorization tech.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.ei.rd.kjm
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MAY 1970R
REVISED 3 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type sty/e)
UNREADING QUESTIONS AND ITEMS
Reference: HCOB 3 Dec 78 UNREADING FLOWS
Never list a listing question that doesn't read.
Never prepcheck an item that doesn't read.
These rules hold good for all lists, all items, all flows, including
Dianetics.
A "tick" or a "stop" is not a read. Reads are small falls or falls or
long falls or long fall blowdown (of TA).
A preclear's case can be gotten into serious trouble by listing a list
that doesn't read or prepchecking an item that doesn't read or running an
item or flow that doesn't read.
On a list, this is the sort of thing that happens:
The list is "Who or what would fly kites?" The C/S has said to "List
this to a BD F/N item." So the auditor does list it without checking the
read at all. The list can go on 99 pages with the pc protesting, getting
upset. This is called a "Dead horse list" because it gave no item. The
reason it didn't was that the list question itself didn't read. One does an
L4BRA on the pc to correct the situation and gets "unnecessary action."
On a list that is getting no item you don't extend. You correctly use
L4BRA or any subsequent issue of it. If you extend a "dead horse list" you
just make things worse. Use an L4BRA and it will set it right.
This weird thing can also happen. C/S says to list "Who or what would
kill buffaloes?" The auditor does, gets a BD F/N item "A hunter." The C/S
also says to list as a second action "Who or what would feel tough?" The
auditor fails to test the question for read and lists it. Had he tested it,
the list would not have read. But the list comes up with an item, "A mean
hunter." It has stirred up charge from the first question and the item "A
mean hunter" is a wrong item as it is a misworded variation of the first
list's item! Now we have an unnecessary action and a wrong item. We do an
L4BRA and the pc is still upset as maybe only one or the other of the two
errors read.
In a Dianetic "list" one is not doing a listing action. One is only
trying to find a somatic or sensation, etc. that will run. The item must
read well. Or it won't produce a chain to run. In actual fact the Dn list Q
does usually read but one doesn't bother to test it.
But an item or flow that doesn't read will produce no chain, no basic
and the pc will jump around the track trying but just jamming up his bank.
The moral of this story is:
ALWAYS TEST A LISTING QUESTION BEFORE LETTING THE PC LIST.
ALWAYS MARK THE READ IT GAVE (SF, F. LF, LFBD) ON THE WORKSHEET.
ALWAYS TEST AN ITEM FOR READ BEFORE PREPCHECKING A ND ALWAYS CHECK AN ITEM
AND FLOW BEFORE RUNNING RECALLS OR ENGRAMS.
ALWAYS MARK THE READ AN ITEM GAVE (SF, F. LF, LFBD) ON THE WORKSHEET.
CHARGE
The whole subject of "charge" is based on this. "Charge" is the
electrical impulse on the case that activates the meter.
"Charge" shows not only that an area has something in it. It also shows
that the pc has possible reality on it.
A pc can have a broken leg, yet it might not read on a meter. It would
be charged but below the pc's reality. So it won't read.
THINGS THAT DON'T READ WON'T RUN.
The Case Supervisor always counts on the AUDITOR to test questions and
items and flows for read before running them.
The auditor, when a question or item or flow doesn't read, can and
should always put in "Suppress" and "Invalidate." "On this (question)
(item) (flow), has anything been suppressed?" "On this (question) (item)
(flow), has anything been invalidated?" If either one read, the question or
item or flow will also read. The Case Supervisor also counts on the AUDITOR
to use Suppress and Invalidate on a question or item or flow. If after this
there is still no read on the question or item or flow, that's it. Don't
use it, don't list it. Go to the next action on the C/S or end off.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dz.ka.rd.jk
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MAY 1970R
REVISED 23 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
C/Ses (Revisions in this type style)
Tech/Qual
Auditors (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
C/ass IV Grad
Checksheet
Interiorization Rundown Series 3
INTERIORIZATION INTENSIVE
2-WAY COMM
The Interiorization Rundown Revised (HCOB of 4 Jan 71R, EXTERIORIZATION
AND HIGH TAs THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED) is ALWAYS followed by a
final session with "2-way comm on interiorization-exteriorization."
If the interiorization auditing has to be repaired, that is done first
of course.
BUT AN INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN IS NEVER COMPLETE UNTIL AN ADDITIONAL
LATER SESSION IS GIVEN ON 2-WAY COMM ON INTERIOR EXTERIOR.
A C/S in repairing cases should always look to see if a pc:
1. Has exteriorized at some time during auditing.
2. If the pc has exteriorized and has not had an Int RD, Int must
be checked, per HCOB 4 Jan 71R, and if charged the only C/S that
can now be done is the Interiorization Rundown (except on C/ears or
above, who get the Recall version).
3. If an Int Rundown has been given, then the C/S must check to
see if a later session was given on "2-way comm Int-Ext."
4. If this 2-way comm was omitted, or not in a separate session,
then "2-way comm on Int-Ext" must be ordered even if there have
been several intervening sessions.
THE PROCESS
As an auditor you would give the pc an R-Factor that you are going to
go over the subject of interiorization and exteriorization with him.
Get him to tell you how he feels about these, based on the Int
button(s) that was assessed and run, and on the subject of Int in general.
The two-way comm session is always taken to F/N.
COG
It is usually the case that the pc did not fully cognite when he had
the Int Rundown. His TA may stay high after an Int session. O/R is of
little use to get it down. What's missing is the 2-way comm session. In it
the pc usually cognites and things then go right.
The current C/S and auditor error is trying to do everything briefly and
all at once. Ordering an Int Rundown and 2-way comm on it in the same
session would be part of such an erroneous trend.
The 2-way comm must be another session preferably on another later day.
It is a flagrant C/S error to omit "2-way comm Int-Ext" after an
Interiorization Rundown session.
The signal to order a check on interiorization per HCOB 4 Jan 71R is pc
went exterior in auditing or has been found to have gone exterior. Auditing
will not run well when the pc is audited past or after exteriorizing.
If charged, an Int Rundown must now be ordered.
If unsuccessful it must be repaired.
Successful or repaired, an Int Rundown must be followed by the 2-way
comm session.
Two-way comm must be done with exact TRs. The auditor must not Q and A.
He must not evaluate (tell the pc what it's all about).
Two-way comm is a precision process. The pc is kept talking, not by
giving him commands. He is kept on the subject of Int-Ext (or the 2-way
comm subject), not encouraged to leap about by Q and A.
You cannot consider an Interiorization Rundown complete unless followed
by 2way comm.
If the case hasn't had it following his Int Rundown he must be ordered
to it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dz.ka.rd.kjm
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 AUGUST 1970R
REVISED 23 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Chksht (Title has been changed from
C/S Chkshts Exteriorization RD Musts to
CIV Grad Interiorization Rundown Musts)
Chkshts
Tech/Qual (Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
Interiorization Rundown Series 8
INTERORIZATION RUNDOWN MUSTS
(Reference: HCOB 4 Jan R, Int RD Series 2
EXT AND HIGH TA, THE INT RD REVISED)
An Interiorization Rundown must be:
1. COMPLETED IN AS FEW SESSIONS AS POSSIBLE, WITH EACH SUCCEEDING
SESSION GIVEN ON THE NEXT CONSECUTIVE DAY.
2. RUN SO AS TO COMPLETE ANY FLOW ON ANY READING BUTTON IN ONE
SESSION. (This means you do not leave a chain half run.)
3. RUN WITHOUT FLUBS.
4. FOLLOWED BY A FINAL SESSION OF 2-WAY COMM RUN TO F/N, COG,
VGIs.
COMPLETING THE RUNDOWN ON AN INTENSIVE BASIS
Originally, when only "went in" and "go in" were assessed on the Int
Rundown, the rule was that the entire rundown was to be given in one
session.
The reason for this was that there is a frequent chance of ruds going
out between sessions and of course they cannot be put in until the Int
Rundown is complete as it's "auditing a pc past exterior."
This is still true.
However, with the full array of Int buttons now to be assessed and any
reading button run on Quad or Triple Flows, and with re-assessment of the
Int buttons, the one session rule may not be workable without "quickie-ing"
the rundown, which must not be done.
Thus, allowance must be made for sufficient time to get the rundown
done fully while still completing it as rapidly as possible, to safeguard
against out-ruds situations cropping up before it is complete.
The safest way to accomplish this is to ensure that the Int Rundown:
1. Is completed in as few sessions as possible.
2. After the first session each succeeding session is given on the next
consecutive day.
3. Plenty of time (2 to 5 hours) must be allowed for each daily session.
4. The auditor must make sure the pc DOES have the necessary time for
this before starting the rundown.
5. Any one flow on any reading Int button MUST be completed in one
session. (You do not end a session with a chain only half or partially
run.)
6. There are no session breaks taken. (Unless pc has a physical PTP, in
which case he can be given a MINIMAL break to handle it and return
right back to session.)
FLUBLESS
Auditors who have occasional flubs-Dn failures to flatten chains or run
them to chopped EP instead of a correct F/N postulate off and VGIs at basic
HAVE NO BUSINESS RUNNING INT RUNDOWNS.
Flubs in any event are just corny.
They are particularly messy when they occur in the INT RUNDOWN.
The Int Rundown is auditing by the book!
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2 EXTERIORIZATION & HIGH TA,
THE INT RD REVISED
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA NED Series 6RA URGENT IMPORTANT
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE)
Flubs mar any auditing result. They make a real mess on an Int Rundown
as review auditing over an exteriorization if the rundown is not complete,
is difficult and results in high TA.
Yet one franchise invalidated the pc's cog, made the pc do it all in
clay, left chains incomplete and took a week over it! And then wondered why
the pc was unhappy!
NO FLUBS!
FOLLOW WITH 2-WAY COMM
A day or two or a week after the Int Rundown (not less than a day nor
more than a week), an Int Rundown MUST BE FOLLOWED BY A TWO-WAY COMM
SESSION.
The reason for this is that there is a cognition delay on almost all
cases. The 2way comm blows off locks, etc. and the pc usually gets a big
cog and never afterwards worries about exteriorization.
If the Int Rundown is not done in DAILY sessions, flubbed, not followed
by 2-way comm in a later session, the pc can get hung up on the subject.
The auditor doing 2-way comm must have experience and know-how on 2-way
comm. (See HCOB 21 April 70, "2-WAY COMM C/Ses," HCOB 3 July '70, "C/Sing 2-
WAY COMM," BTB 10 July '70, "2-WAY COMM-A CLASS III ACTION.")
All 2-way comm sessions go to end phenomena of an F/N.
It is often found the subject of interiorization-exteriorization is still
charged. But it should be checked for read as in all items and subjects
used in auditing. The rule is you don't audit things that don't read.
Suppress and Inval buttons can be put in to get a read. If you audit things
that don't read, the TA is liable to go up.
A nicely done 2-way comm on interiorization and exteriorization blows
the pc to present time and cleans him up nicely.
The Interiorization Rundown is to be done when it is found the pc has
been audited past exterior, providing of course one of the Int buttons
reads on checking. If reading, the RD HAS to be done before review
auditing, ruds or anything else. So it's dicey-a delicate proposition.
An . . . Interiorization . . . Rundown is about the hottest thing
that's come along for some time. It solves, for instance, the total goal of
Buddhism. It is the key to immortality. It's pure theta gold.
So respect it by running by the book, exactly, perfectly and to a total
win.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:rr.rd.dr
Copyright � 1970, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JANUARY 1971R
REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
HGC Auditors
Scn Chkshts (Revises and replaces HCOB
Cl VIII 22 Mar 70 of same title by
Chkshts changing clearing of commands
Cl IV Grad and wording of commands in
Chksht Exteriorization Intensive . )
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Interiorization Rundown Series 2
EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA
THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED
(This bulletin has been revised 24 Sep 78 to give the new, simplified
Int Rundown Revised, which deletes the Recall and Secondary steps, includes
the full array of Int buttons and the New Era Dianetics Int command. It
corrects and replaces all previous issues on the original Int Rundown and
all previously issued Int Rundown commands. It includes notes on the new
"End of Endless Int Repair" Rundown.)
Ref: HCOB 25 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 5
QUAD COMMANDS FOR INT BUTTONS
HCOB 24 Sep 78/ Int RD Series 4
URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF
ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN
HCOB 4 Oct 78 Int RD Series 1
INTERIORIZATION HANDLING SIMPLIFIED
HCOB 12 Sep 78 URGENT IMPORTANT, DIANETICS
FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs
Cancels:
BTB 30 Dec 71 IMPORTANT, INTERIORIZATION RD
COMMANDS
BTB 10 Jul 69R II EXTERIORIZATION REMEDY
BTB 15 Feb 72 I AN OPTIONAL INT RD STEP
BTB 13 Mar 73R HANDLING INT/EXT
NOTE: Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears are NOT audited on this Int
Rundown as they are not to be audited on Dianetics. The reference for
handling repair of out-Int on these pcs and pre-OTs is HCOB 24 Sep 781, Int
RD Series 4 URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN.
For a long while we have known that if you audit a person after he or
she has exteriorized, you often get a high tone arm, somatics and an upset
case.
The answer has been to cease to audit a person after exteriorization
has occurred.
This is so much a fact that five out of five "in trouble" cases I
recently examined had every one of them been audited for some time after
they exteriorized. The TA had or had not gone high but the cases were
bogged. They revived at once when the fact of exteriorization was located.
F/N, VGIs and when rehabbed (by counting number of times) somatics ceased.
The rule has been-don't audit after a pc has exteriorized.
This is one of those very fundamental things that seems to defy research
and yet if not solved will keep things messed up. Persons who exteriorize
on lower grades need their upper grades and yet if audited further may mess
up. This places a limit on auditing and yet the person may still have
aberrations and somatics. But the fact of having exteriorized bars the
road.
So I got to work and made a breakthrough on it. Hurrah!
It has now been fully vindicated by long tests and is now released for
general use.
EXTERIORIZATION
Exteriorization is defined as the act of moving out of the body with or
without full perception.
It is the fact of this act which proves that the individual is not a
body but an individual . This discovery in 1952 proved beyond any question
the existence of a thetan, that the individual was a thetan, not a body,
and disproved that Man was an animal and that he was a spiritual being
timeless and deathless.
Techniques have existed since 1952 that exteriorize a person. These are
not now used because (a) the person, still being aberrated and not Clear,
soon returns to his body and (b) when audited thereafter has trouble.
This is a major problem a thetan sometimes has at death. How to
exteriorize? He makes it eventually of course but he should be able to do
so at once.
But, in my research, I found it unreasonable that a person would be
hard to audit just because he had exteriorized and had re-interiorized. For
he has obviously done just that at every death and birth and must have done
so hundreds of billions of times. So why should a recent exteriorization
then make him hard to audit? Yet it did.
My asking of that question was the first breakthrough. The rest soon
followed.
ENGRAM BEHAVIOR
We know in Dianetics that if you continue to run the last part of an
engram which has in fact an earlier beginning which isn't being run and is
ignored the TA will go up.
The reason for this is that the first of a chain or the first part of
an experience or a first experience (basic on a chain of incidents) has to
be run for the chain or incident to erase.
If you only ran the end of incidents you would get a high TA and no
erasure.
If you only ran incidents late on the chain you would get a high TA.
Pcs are uncomfortable, feel under pressure, when their TA is high
(above 3.5 or up).
If you don't erase incidents or chains of incidents when auditing (or
key them out as in release) you get a perpetually high TA.
High TA cases have been "overrun" on something. That however is a very
oversimplified explanation. The truth is that they have been run on
something that didn't erase. The something has an earlier beginning than
was detected or an earlier incident. In life one, having engrams about it,
adds new incidents in living until something is "overrun" or done too
often. The TA is therefore high.
A TA records MASS. Mental mass has a higher electrical resistance and
so measures more "ohms" of resistance, an electrical term for the trouble
electricity has in
passing through something. The more resistance the more units of resistance
are recorded on the meter. The TA actually measures resistance.
Thus, the end of an incident can be restimulated. If the beginning of
it is never touched then one will just accumulate more and more mass.
THE MISSED BEGINNING
What has happened here, as regards exteriorization is that we have
concentrated on EXTERIORIZATION.
If one is IN something, he must have gotten into it.
Therefore the beginning of an exteriorization is the INTERIORIZATION.
The being went into something before he went out of it.
Exteriorization occurs at death. That's an engram. Interiorization
occurs at birth, that's an engram.
So when somebody goes exterior he is actually liable to key-in having
gone interior in the first place.
Get it?
So when you exteriorize somebody or he exteriorizes during auditing he
gets keyed-in a bit and without having audited earlier INTERIORIZATIONS, he
has been put in the last part (exteriorization) of an incident which began
with interiorization.
Not only are you touching on something (exteriorization) late on a
chain (which has hundreds of billions of like incidents ahead of it), you
are also touching something which is late in the incident (which began with
interiorization).
On both counts then, the TA may go high.
THE REMEDY
The remedy is to audit out interiorizations (i.e., times the person
went in) using the correctly assessed Int button.
If this is done, then the pc can be audited all you want after
exteriorization.
Auditing the interiorizations with R3RA, Quad or Triple Flows, restores
the possibility of auditing a pc after an exteriorization has occurred in
auditing.
INT RUNDOWN REVISED BY STEPS
Based on recent researches, the original Int Rundown has been newly
revised and simplified.
A full array of Int buttons has been added.
The Recall and Secondary steps have been deleted, so the pc gets to the
basic of any Int trouble on a faster route.
Int chains are run using a simpler R3RA command for Int, and each chain
taken to full New Era Dianetics EP.
The revised rundown follows.
THE PROCESS
THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED
The case supervision directions for an Interiorization RD are to be
done by a Scientology auditor who is also a Hubbard New Era Dianetics
Auditor.
He must have an excellent command of metering, TRs, R3RA, the theory of
Int and the Int RD commands, and he must know and be able to recognize an
F/N, a postulate and full Dianetic EP when these occur.
1. Omit ruds of any kind and do NOT attempt a rapid L1C. The TA will
just go up out the roof on any type of ruds or list. Simply start the
session and go right onto the following steps.
2. With the pc on the meter, have him read pages 1-3 of this bulletin
(HCOB 4 Jan FIR), through the section entitled "The Remedy." C/ear up
any confusion. Handle any misunderstood words. Help the pc do a simple
demo of the theory that: "In" is the earlier beginning or the earlier
similar incident of "Out. "
(This is not to be a clay demo nor complex. Keep it simple, just
ensure the pc gets it.)
3. Clear EXTERIORIZATION with the pc as THE ACT OF MOVING OUT OF THE
BODY WITH OR WITHOUT FULL PERCEPTION. Make certain he's got it. Demo
it, if necessary.
4. Check for having been audited after exteriorization. (TA should come
down and F/N, cog, VGIs.)
5. Rehab (rehabilitate) this condition by getting or counting the number
of times exteriorized. You should get F/N, cog, VGIs.
6. Assess the following list of Int buttons. (Do NOT clear the buttons
first.)
INT BUTTONS
GO IN
WENT IN
PUT IN
INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING
WANT TO GO IN
CAN'T GET IN
KICKED OUT OF SPACES
CAN'T GO IN
BEING TRAPPED
FORCED IN
PULLED IN.
If none of the Int buttons read on this assessment, get in Suppress,
Invalidate and Misunderstood on the Int button list. (Do not omit this
basic rule of assessment. Ref: HCOB 15 Oct 73RA, C/S Series 87RA, NULLING
AND F/NING PREPARED LISTS.)
7. Then clear and demo ONLY the button that reads.
If the pc seems disinterested or unhappy with the button that reads,
check False.
CAUTION: The pc may have an MU which caused a particular button to
read. Thus ensure the button is not reading on an MU, and if a button
has read on an MU then clear it and reassess it. Don't give the pc a
wrong item or even monkey around with a wrong item. The above actions
help you ensure getting the CORRECT Int button.
It is important, in clearing the reading buttons, that the pc
understands you will be auditing times he WENT IN or WAS BEING TRAPPED,
etc. and NOT "was in" or "was already trapped" or "was stuck in," etc.
You will be auditing the actual times the action of moving in occurred.
THE ABOVE CLEARING STEPS ARE VITAL, AS THE PC WILL NOT BE ABLE TO DO
THE INT RD OVER MISUNDERSTOODS OR ON A MISASSESSED INT BUTTON. TO AUDIT
HIM OVER MUs CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF THE AUDITOR'S CODE. ON THE OTHER
HAND, DO NOT OVERDO THESE CLEARING ACTIONS, AS YOU ALREADY HAVE A PC ON
YOUR HANDS WHO IS IN TROUBLE.
NOTE: If none of the Int buttons read even when Suppress, Invalidate
and Misunderstood are applied, do NOT clear them and do NOT continue
the Int Rundown steps.
8. When the largest reading button has been cleared per Step 7, take
that button and run it R3RA Quad. (TRIPLE IF PC IS ONLY TRIPLE.) Each
flow is taken to full Dianetic EP, using the command:
"Locate a time when you (Int button)."
EXAMPLE:
Int button with largest read: FORCED IN
Run:
Fl 1: Locate a time when you were forced in. (To full Dn EP)
Fl 2: Locate a time when you forced another in. (To full Dn EP)
Fl 3: Locate a time when others forced others in. (To full Dn EP)
Fl 0: Locate a time when you forced yourself in. (To full Dn EP)
(NOTE: The Quad command wordings for each of the Int buttons are
listed on: HCOB 25 Sep 781, Int RD Series 5, QUAD COMMANDS FOR
INT BUTTONS.)
DO NOT EVER RUN A PC ON FLOW ZERO FOR THE FIRST TIME ON INT. A TRIPLE
PC CAN BE QUADED UP AFTER INT HANDLING IS COMPLETE, BUT IT IS NEVER
DONE ON INT HANDLING OR INT REPAIR.
9. When all four flows on the reading button have each been run to full
EP, reassess the Int button list per Step 6. If another button now
reads, repeat Steps 7 and 8.
Should you have a persistent F/N after the four flows on the first
button have been run, reassess the next day per Step 6 and if any
button then reads, repeat Steps 7 and 8. If, on the other hand, you now
have an F/Ning Int button list, it is safe to end off the Int Rundown.
10. Otherwise, you continue to assess the Int button list per Step 6 and
to run any reading item R3RA Quad (or Triple) per Steps 7 and 8, until
the entire Int button list is F/Ning on assessment.
DO NOT OVERRUN THE INT RUNDOWN. See section below on "Vital Data on
Int RD End Phenomena."
CAUTION: ANY FLOW ON ANY READING BUTTON MUST BE RUN TO EP IN ONE
SESSION, AND THE INT RUNDOWN MUST BE COMPLETED IN AS FEW SESSIONS AS
POSSIBLE.
11. The final step, which is done after the final session, preferably on
another later day, is a 2-way comm session on Int/Ext. (Ref: HCOB 30
May 70R, Int RD Series 3, INTERIORIZATION INTENSIVE 2-WAY COMM.)
RUNNING INT WITH R3RA
The R3RA steps and procedure are standard except that they address the
subject of "interiorization" (expressed as any one of the buttons on the
Int button list).
Note that New Era Dianetics preassessment is not included in the
revised Int Rundown, nor is the running of AESPs. (See HCOB 24 Sep 78 II,
Int RD Series 13, PREASSESSMENT, AESPs AND INT.)
In running the Int chain (or chains) it is important to run the actual
"going in" action which would be near or at the beginning of the incident.
Thus, if the pc is running an incident where he is "already in," ensure you
check for an earlier beginning to the incident to pick up the "going in"
type of action.
The questions to find an earlier beginning when running R3RA are:
"Is there an earlier beginning to this incident?" or
"Does the one we're running start earlier?" or
"Does there seem to be an earlier starting point to this incident?"
The earlier similar command when running R3RA is:
"Is there an earlier incident when you (Int button)?"
Each flow must be taken to basic and the full Dianetic EP of: F/N,
postulate (postulate off = erasure), and VGIs.
The auditor must have an excellent command of New Era Dianetics tech.
(Reference for New Era Dianetics R3RA commands and procedure is: HCOB
26 Jun 78RA 11, NED Series 6RA, URGENT IMPORTANT, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM
RUNNING B Y CHA INS.)
VITAL DATA ON
INT RD END PHENOMENA
Exteriorization is not the EP of the Int Rundown. If it happens that
the pc goes exterior during the RD, you end off gently as in any other
auditing. But that is not the EP, and you may have to pick him up again
later and complete the Int RD or handle it with the End of Endless Int
Repair Rundown.
THE EP OF THE INT RUNDOWN IS NO MORE CONCERN OR TROUBLE WITH
EXTERIORIZATION OR INTERIORIZATION.
This is generally accomplished by auditing the pc to an F/Ning Int
button list.
But there is another phenomenon that can occur while running Int. IT IS
VITAL THAT AN AUDITOR DOES NOT MISS THIS SHOULD IT HAPPEN.
It goes like this: You're auditing along and suddenly some mass discharges,
down comes the TA, you suddenly have a floating TA, and that's it. The pc
has hit the EP.
If you proceed past that point you're in trouble. You DON'T then
reassess the Int button list and you DON'T continue running Quad Flows,
even if all the flows have not yet been run on one reading button.
You do nothing but take your paws off the meter and gently end the
session. If you do otherwise you can mess up a case.
It isn't exteriorization. Exteriorization could occur at the same time;
however we could not care less because exteriorization is not the EP of the
process.
But at ANY point at which the above phenomenon occurs on the Int RD-
mass moves off, the TA comes crashing down and you can't keep the needle on
the dial because the TA itself is floating-you end off the rundown because
you have the EP.
What has happened here is that you've blown the stuck flow of "going
in."
Int sends the TA up because the person has plowed deeper into more and
more mass and come out of less and less mass. You have been auditing the pc
on what has been, for eons, a stuck flow of obsessively going in. At any
point in the auditing that stuck flow can suddenly give way. It heaves in
the opposite direction, and the stuck flow of "going in" vanishes.
When that happens it's the end of the process, as that is all you want
to accomplish with the Int Rundown.
If you were then to check the Int button list (which you DO NOT DO AT
THIS POINT) you would find the Int buttons all F/Ning.
FUTURE AUDITING
When the pc has attained the EP of Int, either on the above phenomenon
or by reassessing the Int buttons and running them on the flows to an
F/Ning Int button list, one should now be able to audit the pc even after
exteriorization.
However, HCOB 7 Mar 75, EXT AND ENDING SESSION would still be applied.
WARNING
The Int Rundown is a major case action and should only be run when the
pc is rested and in good physical shape.
THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR
The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown (HCOB 24 Sep 781, Int RD Series
4, URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN) is the superbly
workable new process just developed to handle any needed Int repair.
It resolves any Int troubles that might persist even after a pc has had
an Int Rundown done totally standardly.
It does not replace the Int Rundown; rather, it complements it, when
necessary, as it runs Int by Recalls. We audit out the Int engrams on the
Int Rundown. Then if repair is needed, the End of Endless Int Repair RD can
be used to clean it up smoothly with Recalls. It is the answer to
overrepair of Int on any pc.
Additionally, it can be used for handling Int repair on Clears, OTs and
Dianetic Clears.
The above HCOB, 24 Sep 78 I, fully covers the purpose and use of this
valuable new repair rundown.
SUMMARY
If a pc goes exterior on Dianetics or any Scientology auditing you
must, as his next session, check the Int buttons for read, and if any read,
clear them and do the new, vastly simplified and revised Int Rundown using
the above C/S. With this done the pc . . . can go on being audited. And if
repair is needed, the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown is the answer.
These new developments and refinements give us a simpler, more thorough
tech for resolving Int than we have ever had before.
The way is open to more powerful OTs.
All fundamental discoveries are essentially simple ones.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 JANUARY 1971R
Remimeo REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Class IV
Grad (Revisions and Additions in this type style)
Checksheet
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
(Revised 24 Sep 78 to give current data on
references covering exteriorization and its handling.)
Interiorization Rundown Series 9
EXTERIORIZATION
On reviews of field-given exteriorization intensives during the past
year, I found many cases had been flubbed.
On researching this I found the following:
1. The remedy was being used as an effort to exteriorize people. People
exteriorize in any normal auditing. What was needed was a remedy to be
able to audit them thereafter without driving their TAs up.
2. Auditors evidently skimped their HDC Courses and did not know WHY one
went to an earlier beginning or earlier incident. Thus they didn't know
why you had to run interiorization.
3. HCOB 22 Mar 70 EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, (now HCOB 4 Jan 71R,
EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED) must
have been studied only for the rote commands. The theory of it was not
studied.
4. Common Dianetic goofs got in the road of the rundown, the auditor
failing to repeat the chain in asking for an earlier incident.... (Ref:
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA, Issue II, New Era Dianetics Series 6RA.)
5. The exteriorization intensive was being stretched over several
sessions. As only it can be audited, between sessions PPS, etc., would
intervene.... (Current ref: HCOB 20 Aug 70R, Int RD Series 8, INT RD
MUSTS.)
6. Clearing the command was flubby and the pc often thought
interiorization meant "being in and trying to get out" and so the wrong
end of the incident (the end) was being run.
7. People who hadn't been exterior at all and whose TAs were normal-not
high- were being run on it.
8. It was being sold as a special rundown to exteriorize people, not
just to enable them to go on being audited.
The number of Exteriorization Rundown flubs is excessive.
Therefore new HCOBs and a new pack have been issued. These include:
HCOB 4 Jan 71, EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, REVISED, (now HCOB 4 Jan
71R EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED) which
contains the theory and NEW COMMANDS nobody can goof.
HCOB 6 Jan 71, STARRATE CHECKOUTS FOR EXTERIORIZATION INTENSIVE. (This data
is now in HCOB 25 Sep 78, Issue II, Int RD Series 14 STARRATE CHECKOUTS FOR
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN.)
HCOB 5 Jan 71, GOING EARLIER IN R3R AND EXTERIORIZATION INTENSIVES.
(This issue has been canceled by BTB 10 Dec 74, Issue VIII.)
Commands and procedure for running New Era Dianetics in an
Interiorization RD are now contained in:
HCOB 4 Jan 71R, Int RD Series 2, EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, THE
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED.
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA, Issue II, New Era Dianetics Series 6RA, URGENT
IMPORTANT, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS.
The glaring outness is Dianetic . . . skill..A Dianetic auditor who
can't run a flubless Dianetic session and get all . . . flows down to F/N
studied in doubt, audits in doubt and ought to be in a condition of doubt
until he retreads and actually reads the text and does the drills.
Dianetics . . . is just too easy to be flubbed.
After patching up many of these done in the field I became very alert
to the state of training. A new Course Supervisor course has been done and
is being issued.
Obviously, auditors are no longer required to be starrated on new
materials before they audit them. This omission must be remedied at once.
NO AUDITOR MAY AUDIT MATERIALS OR APPLY HCOBs ON WHICH HE HAS NOT BEEN
STARRATED .
No HGC or C/S may order an auditor to run a process if that auditor has
not been starrated on its theory and practical first.
As for Dianetics, an auditor who cannot routinely carry a chain to an
F/N VGI cog and erasure . . . may not retain his certificate unless
retreaded and his certificate is suspended until he is retreaded. (full New
Era Dianetics EP is covered in HCOB 16 Sep 78, POSTULATE OFF EQUALS
ERASURE.)
For people to goof up using these clean positive tools is inexcusable.
The results are there to be obtained. WE OBTAIN SPECTACULAR POSITIVE
RESULTS WITH THESE SAME MATERIALS DAILY WHEREVER THEY ARE ACTUALLY STUDIED
AND APPLIED.
Please correct flubby auditing wherever you find it. Auditors must be
checked out and drilled on new materials. Courses must be precisely taught.
People who flub must be crammed until they don't. And those who still flub
must be retreaded.
The materials when applied produce great results. When they are not
applied they don't.
SO APPLY THEM!
CORRECTLY.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.kim
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MARCH 1971-1RA
ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975
REVISED 12 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
NED Grad
Checksheet (Revisions in this type style)
C/Ses (Ellipses indicate deletions)
C/S Series 28RA-1RA
USE OF QUADRUPLE DIANETICS
With the introduction of QUADRUPLE DIANETICS the problems of how to C/S
it arise.
This rule is followed:
. . . THE FOURTH FLOW-0-MUST BE RUN ON ALL ITEMS FORWARD FROM THE FIRST
DIANETIC ITEM EVER RUN ON THE CASE IF THE PC IS QUAD AND THE FLOW 0 READS.
Where a case has already had Flows 2 and 3 run on Singles, one goes
back and runs Flow 0 on those items if it reads.
Where a case has only been run on Single Flow Dianetics (Flow 1) one
goes back to the first Dianetic item ever run of which record can be found
and does F2, F3, F0 in that order checking the command for read before
running it, and then verifying the F1.
If you fail to "quad up" a pc and start with the first item never run
on that flow and if you suddenly begin to run Quad on a pc who is Single or
Triple without picking up and running the original items which were Single
or Triple into Quad form, you will stir up and bypass all the charge that
was on that flow originally. To suddenly begin Quad without catching the pc
up is to invite catastrophe as the charge bypassed will kick the pc in the
teeth, and hard.
Example: Joe was run on Single Flow for six months. His auditor finds a
new item and suddenly decides to run it Quad. Six months worth of Flow 2,
Flow 3 and Flow 0 will now restim because it is bypassing that charge. The
auditor's proper correction action is to indicate to the pc what has
happened and catch up the missing flows on all the earlier items run THAT
NOW READ.
To C/S a case for Quad Dianetics it is best to first lay out a
Scientology repair, making sure the case is flying, then list out the items
already run on Single and Triple. Then get them run so that all four flows
are complete on each item in sequence from first to last.
This includes any LX items, former practice, drugs or any other engram
running. These, like Dianetic items, are listed in their correct sequence
of former running.
Then the missing flows are run if they read.
A rehab step of the flows already run is not necessary. This rehab of a
flow already run to EP is usually used only when there is question about
its having gone to postulate off, F/N and VGIs (erasure).
In C/Sing for Quadruple one COMPLETES any flow of an item found that did
not erase. This is indicated on the item list.
DOING THE LIST
The item list is done by the auditor in his admin time for well done
time credits.
All former Dianetic items ever run are listed and what flows have been
run on them and to what end phenomena.
Example:
Engram List
3 Sept 69 Sadness (exact wording that was used) F1
4 Sept 69 A Bored Feeling F1 Bogged
6 Sept 69 An Apathetic Outlook F1 Bogged
6 Nov 69 LX Agonized Fl F2 F3
7 Nov 69 Former Therapy Fl F2 F3
F2 Bogged
9 Nov 69 Earlier Practices F1 Bogged
10 Nov 69 A Horrible Sadness F1 Bogged
5 July 70 Int RD F1 F2 F3
F3 Bogged
6 July 71 An Awful Pressure F1 Bogged
Such a list is then handled from the earliest forward by:
(a) Completing the bogged flow and
(b) Completing the missing flow, if it reads.
INT RUNDOWN
If the TA on the pc is currently high or the pc is having Int troubles,
Int is handled before any other action is done. The fourth flow is never
suddenly introduced on Int if the pc has been run on Triples.
The fourth flow on Int is then audited in its proper sequence when one
gets to it in Quading, IF IT READS.
Note that a drug chain also makes a high TA if in existence or unflat.
AUDITOR CHECKOUT
BEFORE RUNNING NEW ERA DIANETICS QUADRUPLE EVERY AUDITOR HDC, . . .,
IV, VI, VII, VIII AND C/Ses MUST BE A GRADUATE OF THE HUBBARD NEW ERA
DIANETICS ... COURSE....
FLUBS
If any auditor has a poor record of getting Dianetics results, of
bogged flows, etc., he needs a New Era Dianetics retread. His drills and
TRs are out or he is committing gross auditing errors.
Dianetics gives remarkable results only when flawlessly done.
The commands must be precisely given and all commands are used. It is
NEVER shorted "because the pc did it."
THUS ANY NEW ERA DIANETICS AUDITOR TO. . . QUAD A PC'S UNRUN FLOWS MUST:
(A) HAVE A RECORD OF GOOD FLUBLESS NEW ERA DIANETIC AUDITING or
(B) MUST HAVE A RETREAD UNDER A COMPETENT SUPERVISOR and
(C) MUST HAVE COMPLETED THE HUBBARD NEW ERA DIANETICS GRADUATE
(CASE SUPERVISOR) COURSE OR HAVE CHECKED OUT FULLY ON THE QUAD
ISSUES.
C/Sing
Quad Dianetics, with the above, otherwise C/Ses the same as NEW ERA
DIANETICS.
It should be realized Dianetics is its own field of C/Sing. This
remains the same in Quad Dianetics.
PROMOTION
Quad Dianetics should be promoted only when you have Dianetic auditors,
the auditors checked out and okayed to audit as above and when you CAN
DELIVER.
IVs or VIs should be available to do the Progress Pgms and steps.
UPPER LEVELS
When the IVs, VIs, VIIs, VIIIs or IXs are checked out as above, they
should use Quad Dianetics to handle any and all engram steps called for in
general auditing.
That they are upper level auditors does not make it less necessary to
do the above.
RESULTS
Quad Dianetics, including the rerun actions, produces some very
startling new gains.
Well done Dianetics always has produced fine results.
Quad Dianetics almost doubles the gain.
REMEDIES
Any and all Dianetic Remedies and general technology remain in full
use. They are not changed at all. Only the Zero Flow is added in each case.
Good luck.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.jh.rb/lfg.jk
Copyright � 1971, 1975, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 MARCH 1971R
Issue II
REVISED 6 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
Admin Students
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
Data Series 21R
DATA SERIES AUDITING
HCOB 24 July 1970, DATA SERIES, and HCOB 28 August 1970RA, HC OUTPOINT
PLUS-POINT LISTS RA are CANCELED.
Whenever a student cannot grasp or retain the data of the DATA SERIES
policy letters, he must be programmed for Method One Word Clearing, the
PRD, any of the various student repairs, New Era Dianetics, etc. He can
also be given Super Power.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:clb
Copyright � 1971, 1974, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 APRIL 1971-1RC
Remimeo ADDITION OF 13 JANUARY 1975
NED Grad REVISED 25 JULY 1978
Checksheet REVISED 2 OCTOBER 1978
REVISED 12 DECEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 32RA-1RC
USE OF QUAD DIANETICS
With the introduction of Quadruple Dianetics it is mandatory important
urgent that one does not audit four flow items until one has brought all
earlier Dianetic items into four flows, checking each flow for a read, of
course, before running it.
TRIPLE
This also applies to Triple Dianetics. On a case where only Flow One
(Single) has been run, you don't suddenly run a Triple (F1, F2, F3) such as
on the LX Class VIII Lists until one has run the earliest Dn item ever run
(or that can be found) on Dn Triple and then on forward on Triple up to the
LX.
QUAD
However, one would now not bother to run only Triples forward. He would
locate the earliest Single or Triple (if no Single Flow) item and run it
Quadruple by now running the missing flows if reading.
INT RD
In doing an INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN one mustn't suddenly introduce the
4th flow (F Zero).
If the case has only had Triples in Dianetics one mustn't suddenly
introduce a Flow Zero on INT. The case should be done on Triple Flow INT.
THEN all earlier Dn items in sequence run are:
(a) Listed from W/S or Folder Summaries.
(b) Brought up to current by running in all the missing flows of
Quad if reading.
(c) The INT RD fourth flow is audited in when one gets to it IF IT
READS.
The moral of the story is: RUN ONLY FLOWS THAT INSTANT READ WHEN
CALLED.
REASON
Auditing additional flows while earlier items remain Single or Triple
restimulates the missing flows and stacks them up as mass. They can make a
pc uncomfortable until run.
All the missing flows (that were not run) are still potential mass.
This mass restimulates like something too late on the chain when a flow not
run on earlier items is run on later items.
Auditing itself is a sort of time track. The earliest session blows the
later sessions.
FULL FLOW TABLE
Before running Quad Dianetics one makes a table of earlier items run.
Like this:
FULL FLOW TABLE
Flow
Date Item Previously Run Must Run
2.3.62 Guf Shoulder F1 F2, 3, 0
3.3.67 Gow in Foot F1 F2, 3, 0
30.4.67 Chow in Chump F1 F2, 3, 0
29.9.68 LX Anger F1, 2, 3 F0
LX Peeved F1, 2, 3 F0
4.10.69 Feeling Numb F1, 2, 3 F0
5.9.70 Int RD F1, 2, 3 F0
9.10.70 Feeling of Goof F1, 2, 3 F0
10.10.71 Dn Assist on Head F1 F2, 3, 0
FLOWS
F1 is FLOW ONE, something happening to self.
F2 is FLOW TWO, doing something to another.
F3 is FLOW THREE, others doing things to others.
F0 is FLOW ZERO, self doing something to self.
R3RA COMMANDS
Standard R3RA commands are used on Quad Dianetics.
They are the subject of another HCOB.
MULTIPLE SOMATIC ITEMS
The question will come up, do we Triple or Quad multiple somatic items.
The test is, did the flows already run go to EP when they were
originally run. If they did, include them. If they didn't run exclude them.
This does not mean you omit everything that didn't run.
REPAIR
While auditing this FULL FLOW DIANETICS you will find various chains
that did not go to EP when originally run.
These are included and should be concluded to EP. This means one has to
find out if they bypassed the F/N, went too early, jumped the chain, etc.
Usually an L3RF assessed on that faulty action will give the answer. It is
easy to take these old flubbed chains to EP unless you work at it too hard.
Usually the reason they didn't is visible on the old worksheet. The auditor
forgot to ask for earlier beginning or jumped the chain or tried to run it
twice forgetting he'd run it before. Corny errors.
RESULT
The result of doing a FULL FLOW DIANETIC ACTION on a case is quite
spectacular. The shadowy remains of somatics blow, mass blows and the pc
comes up shining.
OFFERING FFD
Offering the public Full Flow Dianetics must include the cost of
FESing, FF Table making, and C/S work since it is sometimes lengthy. The
auditing can be remarkably brief. The greatest amount of time is usually
spent on the C/Sing and the table making.
FFD is offered to the public in intensives as per HCOB 31 May 1971R,
C/S Series 39R, STANDARD 12/2 HOUR INTENSIVE PROGRAMS. Admin time spent on
C/Sing, FESing and FF Table making should be deducted from the intensive
hours purchased by the pc. This must be made known to the public when
purchasing the service.
When offering FFD it should be called Quadruple Dianetics-4 times more
powerful than previous auditing.
A C/S must liaise with the Dissem Sec and Treasury Sec on selling it or
he'll find the org is losing money doing the C/Sing and tables.
WARNING
When doing Quadruple Dianetics on some cases it may be found that many
chains are now missing or are just copies of the original. Don't be
disturbed. Pc says they're gone now they're gone. Just F/N the fact and
carry on with the next flow or item.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.lfg.kjm.jk
Copyright � 1971, 1975, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1971RB
REVISED 1 DECEMBER 1974
Remimeo CANCELS HCOB 3 DEC 71 HANDLING SHEET
Class IV REVISED 15 FEBRUARY 1977
Grad Check- REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1978
sheet
Class VI
Checksheet (Revisions not printed in a different type style)
Class IV Grad and
above Auditors
C/Ses
EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD
EXGF 40RD
The Expanded Green Form 40RD is used with the Resistive Cases
Assessment on a resistive case to precisely locate and solve its
resistiveness.
The assessment of the resistive cases will direct the auditor to the
type of the pc's resistiveness. Further assessment is then done in the
section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD appropriate to what has read on the
Resistive Cases Assessment and handlings are given for what has been found.
This list provides a fast and direct method for solving resistive
cases.
Before using this list on any pc the auditor must have first checked
out on HCOB 8 Dec 78 Iss II GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE
OF.
RESISTIVE CASES ASSESSMENT
(If this assessment has just been done on the Green Form No. 40
question, it is not repeated. Go right into the Expanded Green Form 40RD
assessments.)
Assess Method 5 the following resistive cases. If any item reads, go to
its corresponding section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD and assess Method
5 all the items in that section. Assess the section on the Expanded Green
Form 40RD that corresponds to each reading item.
When all sections corresponding to the reading resistive cases items
are assessed you will have a full picture of the pc's resistiveness.
Then, if you have C/S okay, take up each reading section on the EXGF
40RD in the order in which they are listed below and handle reads per the
instructions given.
Otherwise, return to the C/S for programming.
A-1 WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED _________
A-2 HAD ENGRAMS RUN AFTER BEING DIANETIC CLEAR _________
B DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _________
C AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT _________
D OVERWHELMED _________
E CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _________
F-1 SUPPRESSED _________
F-2 CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON _________
G SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL _________
H HAS NOT HAD AUDITING _________
I-1 SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________
I-2 HAS TAKEN DRUGS _________
J FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY _________
K HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES _________
L-1 OUT OF VALENCE _________
L-2 ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE _________
M PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED _________
N AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _________
O MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING _________
SECTION A-WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND
NEVER ATTESTED
If item A-1 reads, Date/Locate. If item A-2 reads, 2WC to F/N and
return to the C/S.
SECTION B-DOESN'T WANT AUDITING
B-1 DO YOU NOT WANT AUDITING? _________
2WC to find out why not. It will be an out-rud or an out-list. Handle
appropriately.
B-2 ARE YOU REFUSING AUDITING? _________
2WC to find out why. It will be an out-rud or an out-list. Handle
appropriately.
B-3 ARE YOU PROTESTING AUDITING? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
B-4 DO YOU DISLIKE TALKING TO AN AUDITOR? _________
If so, run "Look at me. Who am I?" to F/N. Then "What could you say?"
to F/N.
B-5 HAS NO ONE ASKED WHAT YOU REALLY WANT? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
B-6 HAS THERE BEEN ANYTHING WRONG WITH F/NS? _________
Find the fault and handle with false TA HCOBs. Rehab any overruns due
to false TA.
SECTION C-AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT
C-1 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT? _________
Find out which and handle to F/N.
C-2 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? _________
ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.
C-3 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
C-4 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A WITHHOLD? _________
What was the withhold? Who missed it? E/S to F/N.
C-5 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN OVERT? _________
What was the overt? E/S overt to F/N.
C-6 ARE YOU LYING TO PEOPLE? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
C-7 DO YOU HAVE SECRETS? _________
2WC what secrets E/S to F/N.
C-8 ARE YOU HERE FOR REASONS NOT DISCLOSED? _________
If so, L&N "What was your original reason for coming here?" R3RA
Triple or Quad if an evil purpose. Program for EX DN. (On a Clear, OT
or Dianetic Clear, do the L&N step only.)
C-9 DO YOU HAVE AN EVIL PURPOSE? _________
L&N "What evil purpose do you have?" R3RA Triple or Quad. Program for
EX DN. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, do the L&N step only.)
SECTION D-OVERWHELMED
D-1 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY AUDITING? _________
Run out the incident of overwhelm R3RA Narrative Triple or Quad. (On
Flow 1, acknowledge what the pc says and continue with R3RA Narrative
commands 2-9 A-EYE.)
F2: Return to the time you caused another to be overwhelmed by
auditing and tell me when you are there.
F3: Return to the time others caused others to be overwhelmed by
auditing and tell me when you are there.
F0: Return to the time you caused yourself to be overwhelmed by
auditing and tell me when you are there.
( Progress Program . )
(On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear 2WC for data and use the
appropriate correction list to locate and indicate the bypassed charge
)
D-2 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY LIFE? _________
Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "by
life." (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on
Clears and above.
D-3 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED BY FAMILY CONNECTIONS ? _________
Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "by
family connections." (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate
correction list on Clears and above.
D-4 HAVE YOU BEEN OVERWHELMED ON YOUR POST? _________
(ON YOUR JOB?)
Handle as in D-1 with Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, substituting "on
your post" or "on your job" whichever is appropriate and has read.
(Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate correction list on Clears
and above.
D-5 ARE YOU RESTIMULATED IN YOUR CURRENT ENVIRONMENT? _________
Run out the time he felt restimulated in his environment R3RA
Narrative Triple or Quad. (Progress Program.) 2WC and the appropriate
correction list on Clears and above.
SECTION E-CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING
OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY
E-1 ARE YOU CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY? _________
L&N "What are you trying to prevent?" R3RA Triple/Quad preventing
(item). 2WC committing continuous overts and pull them, E/S to F/N. On
a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear the handling is: L&N "What are you trying
to prevent?" 2WC committing continuous overts and pull them, E/S to
F/N.
E-2 DO YOU KEEP ON GOOFING? _________
Handle as in E-l.
E-3 ARE YOU COMMITTING CONTINUOUS OVERTS IN LIFE? _________
Handle as in E-l.
SECTION F-SUPPRESSED
CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON
F-1 ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE HOSTILE OR ANTAGONISTIC TO SCIENTOLOGY?
_________
PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
F-2 ARE OTHERS ANTAGONISTIC TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING? _________
PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
F-3 HAVE YOU BEEN SUPPRESSED BY ANOTHER? _________
2WC to F/N. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
F-4 DO YOU MAKE GAINS AND THEN LOSE THEM? _________
PTS interview. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
F-5 DO YOU RECEIVE GAINS OR BENEFITS FROM BEING ILL OR DISABLED?
_________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S.
SECTION G-SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL
G-1 ARE YOU SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL? _________
2WC to find out what the illness or symptoms are. Return the folder
to the C/S. Program per HCOB 24 Jul 69R SERIOUSLY ILL PCs and BTB 28
May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
G-2 IS YOUR BODY ILL? _________
2WC "What seems to be wrong with your body?" to F/N. Program per BTB
28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
G-3 ARE YOU MENTALLY ILL? _________
Handle as a withhold. E/S "Is there an earlier time you were mentally
ill?" to F/N. R3RA Narrative Triple/Quad. Then do a full preassessment
on it.
G-4 DO YOU HAVE ANY BROKEN BONES? _________
2WC to F/N. Medical treatment followed by a program per BTB 28 May
74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES .
G-5 DO YOU HAVE ANY INFECTIOUS DISEASE? _________
2WC to get the data on what it is to F/N. Medical treatment followed
by a program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND
ILLNESSES.
G-6 DO YOU HAVE ANY HIDDEN ILLNESSES? _________
2WC to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR
INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
G-7 DO YOU HAVE ANY TOOTH DECAY? _________
2WC to F/N. Dental treatment followed by a program per BTB 28 May
74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES .
G-8 DO YOU HAVE ANY PHYSICALLY DAMAGED PARTS? _________
2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST
CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
G-9 DO YOU HAVE ANY BODY PARTS MISSING? _________
2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST
CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
G-10 HAVE YOU HAD ANY BODY PARTS REMOVED? _________
2WC to find out what, to F/N. Program per BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST
CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES.
SECTION H-HAS NOT HAD AUDITING
H-1 HAVE YOU NOT HAD AUDITING? _________
L&N "Who or what would prevent auditing?" Triple or Quad ruds and
overts on the item.
H-2 HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING? _________
2WC to find out when the pc first started self-auditing. Do an L1C on
the prior upset. If the prior upset was in auditing, use the
appropriate correction list.
H-3 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED IN AN EARLIER LIFE? _________
2WC to F/N. C/S to program to handle any overrun or other
difficulties with past auditing, if needed.
SECTION I-SEEKING THE SAME THRILL
ATTAINED FROM DRUGS
HAS TAKEN DRUGS
I-1 ARE YOU SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you were seeking
the same thrill attained from drugs?") Advance Program for a Drug RD or
to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, indicate the item.
Do no further handling.)
I-2 HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. If pc has had his Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF
if needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears,
OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-1.)
I-3 DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO TAKE DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. If pc has had his Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF
if needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears,
OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in 1-1.)
I-4 HAVE YOU NEVER TAKEN DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you never took
drugs?")
I-5 ARE YOU CURIOUS ABOUT DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. (E/S if needed "Is there an earlier time you were curious
about drugs?")
I-6 HAS MEDICINE ACTED AS DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. If pc has had a Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if
needed. Advance Program to handle all reading drugs, medicine and
alcohol with a full Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears, OTs and
Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-1.)
I-7 HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________
2WC to F/N If pc has had a Drug RD do a Drug RD Repair List. L3RF if
needed. Advance Program for a Drug RD or to complete it. (On Clears,
OTs and Dianetic Clears, handle as in I-l.)
SECTION J-FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY
(If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear,
indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes,
and indicate the F/N. Do no further handling.)
J-1 HAVE YOU HAD A FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on having a former therapy.
F1: Return to the time you had a former therapy and tell me when
you are there.
F2: Return to the time you gave a former therapy to another and
tell me when you are there.
F3: Return to the time others gave a former therapy to others and
tell me when you are there.
F0: Return to the time you gave a former therapy to yourself and
tell me when you are there.
J-2 HAVE YOU HAD MEDICAL THERAPY? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "medical
therapy."
J-3 HAVE YOU HAD PSYCHIATRIC THERAPY? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "psychiatric
therapy."
J-4 HAVE YOU HAD PSYCHOLOGY THERAPY? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "psychology
therapy."
J-5 HAVE YOU HAD DENTAL THERAPY? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, substituting "dental
therapy."
J-6 HAVE YOU HAD ELECTRIC SHOCK? _________
2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for okay to run out the electric shock
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in J-1, followed by a preassessment
of the electric shock.
SECTION K-HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES
(If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear,
indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes,
and indicate the F/N. Do no further handling.)
K-1 ARE YOU CURRENTLY DOING ANY BODY PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on body practices.
F1: Return to the time you took part in body practices and tell me
when you are there.
F2: Return to the time you caused another to take part in body
practices and tell me when you are there.
F3: Return to the time others caused others to take part in body
practices and tell me when you are there.
F0: Return to the time you caused yourself to take part in body
practices and tell me when you are there.
K-2 ARE YOU CURRENTLY DOING ANY EXERCISES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "exercises."
K-3 ARE YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICING ANY RITES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "rites."
K-4 ARE YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICING YOGA? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "yoga."
K-5 DO YOU HOLD ANY EASTERN BELIEFS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "eastern
beliefs."
K-6 ARE YOU DOING ANY MENTAL EXERCISES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "mental
exercises . "
K-7 DO YOU CURRENTLY PRACTICE MEDITATION? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "meditation."
K-8 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER PRACTICES BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY?
_________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
practices before Scientology."
K-9 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER RELIGIONS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
religions."
K-10 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER RITES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
rites."
K-11 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EXERCISES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
exercises."
K-12 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN HYPNOTISM? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "hypnotism."
K-13 HAVE YOU HELD EASTERN BELIEFS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "eastern
beliefs . "
K-14 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER INDOCTRINATIONS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
indoctrinations . "
K-15 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER SCIENTIFIC PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
scientific practices."
K-16 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER ELECTRONIC PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
electronic practices."
K-17 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER THOUGHT PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
thought practices."
K-18 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER SPIRITUAL PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
spiritual practices."
K-19 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EASTERN RITES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
eastern rites."
K-20 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER EASTERN PRACTICES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
eastern practices."
K-21 HAVE YOU TAKEN PART IN EARLIER IMPLANTING TECHNIQUES? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "earlier
implanting techniques."
K-22 HAVE YOU PRACTICED WITCHCRAFT? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on practicing witchcraft.
F1: Return to the time you had witchcraft practiced on you and tell
me when you are there.
F2: Return to the time you practiced witchcraft on another and tell
me when you are there.
F3: Return to the time others practiced witchcraft on others and
tell me when you are there.
F0: Return to the time you practiced witchcraft on yourself and
tell me when you are there.
K-23 HAVE YOU CAST SPELLS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on using spells.
F1: Return to the time a spell was used on you and tell me when you
are there.
F2: Return to the time you used a spell on another and tell me when
you are there.
F3: Return to the time others used spells on others and tell me
when you are there.
F0: Return to the time you used a spell on yourself and tell me
when you are there.
K-24 ARE YOU DOING SOME EXERCISE BETWEEN SESSIONS? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad, as in K-1, substituting "exercises."
SECTION L-OUT OF VALENCE
ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE
If items L-l or L-2 read, the handling is LX3, LX2, LX1 and 220H if
necessary.
Ref: HCOB 2 Aug 69R "LX" LISTS
HCOB 5 Nov 69R V LX3 (ATTITUDES)
HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX2 (EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST)
HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX1 (CONDITIONS)
HCOB 20 Sep 78 II LX LIST HANDLING
(If one of these items read on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the
item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes, and indicate the F/N.
Do no further handling.)
SECTION M-PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES
NOT ATTAINED
(If any item in this section reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear,
indicate the reading item, let the person tell you about it if he wishes,
and indicate the F/N.)
M-1 ARE YOU PRETENDING? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending.
F1: Return to the time another pretended to you and tell me when
you are there.
F2: Return to the time you pretended to another and tell me when
you are there.
F3: Return to the time others pretended to others and tell me when
you are there.
F0: Return to the time you pretended to yourself and tell me when
you are there.
M-2 ARE YOU PRETENDING TRAINING NOT ATTAINED? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1.
M-3 ARE YOU PRETENDING ATTAINMENTS IN LIFE NOT REALLY ATTAINED?
_________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1.
M-4 ARE YOU PRETENDING GRADES NOT ATTAINED? _________
Narrative R3RA Triple or Quad on pretending as in M-1.
SECTION N-AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT
N-1 HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT? _________
2WC to find out what grades the pc feels are out. Indicate it. If no
F/N, "Is there an earlier time you were audited over that/those
outgrade(s)?" Note for C/S.
N-2 IS YOUR DIANETICS INCOMPLETE? _________
2WC to F/N. Note for C/S.
N-3 DO ENGRAMS FAIL TO ERASE? _________
L3RF Rundown. (R-Factor: "We are looking for engrams contacted in
your early auditing and not fully handled." Assess L3RF Method 5 with
the preface "In your early Dianetics ?" Handle with R3RA over and over
until the entire list F/Ns )
(On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the read If no F/N you
may do an L3RF if needed, however do no handling beyond indicating the
reading questions, to F/N.)
N-4 IS YOUR COMMUNICATION GRADE OUT? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade 0
N-5 IS YOUR PROBLEMS GRADE OUT? _________
2WC to F/N Program for Expanded or Quad Grade I.
N-6 IS YOUR OVERT/WITHHOLD GRADE OUT? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade II.
N-7 DO YOU HAVE PERSISTING ARC BREAKS? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade III.
N-8 ARE YOU ANXIOUS ABOUT CHANGE? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade III.
N-9 DO YOU HAVE SERVICE FACSIMILES? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV.
N-10 DO YOU HAVE FIXED IDEAS? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV.
N-11 ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT BEING RIGHT OR WRONG? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for Expanded or Quad Grade IV.
N-12 HAVE YOU FAILED TO ATTAIN OTHER GRADES? _________
2WC to F/N. Note for C/S.
N-13 HAVE WINS ON GRADES BEEN BYPASSED? _________
Rehab each to F/N.
SECTION O-MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING
O-1 HAVE YOU HAD MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING? _________
Find and clear the misunderstoods or do a WCCL prefaced with "In
auditing." Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed.
O-2 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING WHAT WAS GOING ON IN A SESSION?
_________
Clear this up with Word Clearing on the action that wasn't
understood. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed.
O-3 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING AN AUDITOR? _________
2WC to F/N. Handle any MUs with Word Clearing on the area the pc
didn't understand. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-1 if needed.
O-4 HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE IN AUDITING BECAUSE OF MISUNDERSTOODS?
_________
Find the misunderstoods and clear them up.
Note what actions were done over misunderstood words and handle with
the proper repair list if needed. Dianetic C/S-1 and/or Scientology C/S-
1 if needed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1971, 1974, 1977, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JULY 1971R
REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
Franchise (Revisions in this type style)
Level III (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Checksheets Replaces HCOBs 22 May 65 and 23 April 64,
Tech and cancels HCOB 27 July 65 all on the
Qua/ same subject.
C/Ses
SCIENTOLOGY III
AUDITING BY LISTS
(Note: We now F/N everything. We do NOT
tell the pc what the meter is doing. This
changes "Auditing By Lists" in both respects.
We do not say to the pc. "That's clean" or
"that reads.")
Ref: HCOB 14 Mar 71 F/N EVERYTHING
HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR
SETTING UP SESSIONS
AND AN E-METER
HCOB 24 Jan 77 TECH CORRECTION
ROUND-UP
HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA CAN SQUEEZE
HCOB 8 Dec 78II GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM
40RD, USE OF
Use any authorized published LIST. (Green Form for general review, L1C
for ARC Brks, L4BRA for list errors.)
METHOD 3
Set the sensitivity for 1/3 of a dial drop on a correct can squeeze per
E-Meter Drill 5RA (Reference: HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA CAN
SQUEEZE).
Have your meter in a position (line of sight) so you can see the list
and the needle or you can see the needle and the pc. The meter position is
important.
Hold the mimeoed list close beside the meter. Have your worksheet more
to the right. Keep record on your worksheet. Mark the pc's name and date on
it. Mark what list it is on the W/S with time. It remains in the folder
stapled to the W/S.
Read the question on the list, note if it reads. Do NOT read it while
looking at the pc, do NOT read it to yourself and then say it while looking
at the pc. These are the L10 actions and are called Method 6, not Method 3.
It is more important to see the pc's cans than his face as can fiddle can
fake or upset reads.
TR 1 must be good so the pc clearly hears it.
You are looking for an INSTANT READ that occurs at the end of the exact
last syllable of the question.
If it does not read, mark the list X. If the list is being done through
an F/N and the F/N just continues, mark the question F/N.
If the question reads, do not say "That reads." Mark the read at once
(tick, SF, F. LF, LFBD, R/S), transfer the number of the Q to the W/S and
look expectantly at the pc. You can repeat the Q by just saying it again if
pc doesn't begin to talk. He has probably already begun to answer as the Q
was live in his bank as noted by the meter.
Take down the pc's remarks in shortened form on the W/S. Note any TA
changes on the W/S.
If the pc's answer results in an F/N (cog VGIs sometimes follow, GIs
always accompany a real F/N), mark it rapidly on the W/S and say, "Thank
you. I would like to indicate your needle is floating."
Do NOT wait endlessly for the pc to say more. If you do he will go into
doubt and find more, also do NOT chop what he is saying. Both are TR errors
that are very bad.
If there is no F/N, at the first pause that looks like the pc thinks he
has said it, ask for an earlier similar whatever the question concerned. Do
NOT change the Q. Do NOT fail to repeat what the question is. "Was there an
earlier similar restimulation of 'rejected affinity'?" This is the "E/S"
part of it. You do not leave such a question merely "clean."
It does not matter now if you look at the pc when you say it or not.
But you can look at the pc when you say it.
The pc will answer. If he comes to a "looks like he thinks he said it"
and no F/N, you ask the same Q as above.
You ask this Q "Was there an earlier similar " until you finally get an
F/N and GIs. You indicate the F/N.
That is the last of that particular question.
You mark "F/N" on the list and call the next question on the list. You
call this and other questions without looking at the pc.
Those that do not read, you X as out.
The next question that reads, you mark it on the list, transfer the
question number to the W/S.
Take the pc's answer.
Follow the above E/S procedure as needed until you get an F/N and GIs
for the question. Ack. Indicate and return to the mimeoed list.
You keep this up until you have done the whole list in this fashion.
If you got no read on the list question but the pc volunteers some
answer to an unreading question, do NOT take it up. Just ack and carry on
with your mimeoed list.
BELIEVE YOUR METER. Do not take up things that don't read. Don't get
"hunches." Don't let the pc run his own case by answering nonreading items
and then the auditor taking them up. Also don't let a pc "fiddle the cans"
to get a false read or to obscure a real one. (Very rare but these two
actions have happened.)
BIG WIN
If halfway down a prepared list (the last part not yet done) the pc on
some question gets a wide F/N, big cog, VGIs, the auditor is justified in
calling the list complete and going to the next C/S action or ending the
session, except in the case
where an F/Ning list is C/Sed for, e.g. C/S 53RL. The auditor does not
violate C/S Series 20 PERSISTENT F/N. If he is intending to F/N the list,
and the pc is on a big win, the auditor would end off, let the pc have his
win, and then in another later session, continue with the list.
There are two reasons for this-one, the F/N will usually just persist
and can't be read through and further action will tend to invalidate the
win.
The auditor can also carry on to the end of the prepared list if he
thinks there may be something else on it, if it does not violate C/S Series
20 PERSISTENT F/N.
GF AND METHOD 3
When a GF is taken up Method 3 (item by item, one at a time) one ends
it at the first F/N (Reference: HCOB 8 Dec 78 II GREEN FORM AND EXPANDED
GREEN FORM 40RD, USE OF). If the auditor were to continue, it can occur
that the TA will go suddenly high. The pc feels he is being repaired, that
the clearing up of the first item on the GF handled it and protests. It is
the protest that sends the TA up.
Thus a GF is best done by Method 5 (once through for reads, then the
reads handled) .
L1C, L3RF, L7 and other such lists are best done Method 3.
The above steps and actions are exactly how you do Auditing by List
today. Any earlier data contrary to this is canceled. Only 2 points change-
we F/N everything that reads by E/S or a process to handle (L3RF requires
processes, not E/S to get an F/N) or else check for false read if the pc
shows manifestations of this, and we never tell the pc that it read or
didn't read, thus putting his attention on the meter.
We still indicate F/Ns to the pc as a form of completion.
L1C and Method 3 are NOT used on high or very low TAs to get them down
or up.
The purpose of these lists is to clean up bypassed charge.
An auditor also indicates when he has finished with the list.
An auditor should dummy drill this action both on a doll and bullbait.
The action is very successful when precisely done.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.jk
Copyright � 1971, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JULY 1971RC
Remimeo Issue III
Dianetics RE-REVISED 31 JANUARY 1979
Checksheet
All Dn (Revisions in this type style)
Auditors (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
(This bulletin has been revised only to delete THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG
RUNDOWNS from its title. The New Era Dianetic Drug RD given in this
bulletin is its own rundown and a completely separate action from The
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List, which is a repair rundown for
pcs who were run endlessly on old style drug handling. Ref: HCOB 19 Sep
78R, Iss I, Rev. 31.1. 79, THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RDs, and HCOB 19 Sep
78R, Iss II, Rev. 31.1.79, THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR
LIST.)
IMPORTANT
URGENT
C/S Series 48RD
New Era Dianetics Series 9RB
DRUG HANDLING
See: HCOB 28 Aug 68 II DRUGS
HCOB 29 Aug 68 DRUG DATA
HCOB 23 Sep 68 DRUGS & TRIPPERS
Refer: HCOB 19 May 69RB DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES
PRIOR ASSESSING
BTB 12 Aug 69R (HCOB 10 Dec 68 Updated).
CONFIDENTIAL-CASE SUPERVISOR
ACTIONS (Page 24 Resistive Case 220D)
HCOB 2 Nov 57RA AN OBJECTIVE RUNDOWN
Rev. 10.5.74,
Rev . 22.2.75
HCOB 3 Jul 59 GENERAL INFORMATION
HCOB 11 Jun 57 TRAINING AND CCH PROCESSES
Reiss 12 May 72
HCO Training
Bulletin of 6 Feb 57,
Pg 5, Tech Vol III
HCOB 19 Sep 78R THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG
Issue I RUNDOWNS
Rev. 31.1.79
A person who has been on drugs is one of the "seven types of resistive
cases." (These types are found on the Scientology Green Form No. 40.)
A person who has been on drugs, alcohol or medicines seldom runs on any
other type of engram, seldom goes backtrack well, and is subject to
somatic, emotional and perceptic shut-offs making any other type of
Dianetic running a vain activity.
Drugs since 1962 have been in very widespread use. Before then they were
rare. A worldwide spread of drugs occurred. A large percentage of people
became and are drug takers.
By drugs (to mention a few) are meant-tranquilizers, opium, cocaine,
marijuana, peyote, amphetamine and the psychiatrist's gifts to Man, LSD and
Angel Dust, which are the worst. Any medical drugs are included. Drugs are
drugs. There are thousands of trade names and slang terms for these drugs.
ALCOHOL is included as a drug and receives the same treatment in
auditing.
By alcohol (to mention a few) is meant whiskey beer, wine, vodka, rum,
gin, etc. -in other words any fermented or distilled liquor or drink of any
kind or fumes of such with some percentage of alcohol content.
Drugs are supposed to do wonderful things but all they really do is
ruin the person.
Even someone off drugs for years still has "blank periods." The
abilities to concentrate or to balance are injured.
The moral part of it has nothing to do with auditing. The facts are
that:
(a) People who have been on drugs can be a liability until the
condition is handled in auditing.
(b) A former drug user is a resistive case that does not make
stable gains until the condition is handled.
(c) Auditing is the only successful means ever developed for
handling drug damage.
DRUG ENGRAMS
People who have been on drugs are sometimes afraid of running engrams.
In fact, it is almost a way to detect a "druggie."
The drugs, particularly LSD and even sometimes antibiotics or other
medicines to which the person has an allergy, can turn on whole track
pictures violently.
These tend to overwhelm the person and make him feel crazy. Some of
these people are afraid to confront the bank again.
If a person "doesn't like Dianetics" and doesn't want to be run on
engrams, it is necessary to put him through the Hard TRs Course and
Objectives. If Dianetics has been run but poorly, it should of course be
repaired fully with an L3RF (list used to correct Dianetic errors). But if
the person still flinches. the Hard TRs Course and Objectives successfully
completed will handle.
THOSE ON DRUGS
Objective Processes are numerous. It may be necessary to run these on a
person still on drugs and even put the person through a Hard TRs Course to
get the person off drugs. Doing this usually avoids the painful "withdrawal
symptoms," particularly present in coming off heroin or psychiatric
"treatment" drugs. (Note, some persons have been put on some therapeutic
drug by an M.D.-such as insulin and possibly should remain on it until well
advanced into auditing. But these are not the usual drug. It is up to the
pc, the auditor and the doctor what should be done in such cases.
Tranquilizers are not acceptable, however.)
DONE FIRST
Drugs are done first.
Why? Because drugs make a resistive case! Other Dianetic actions and
Scientology as well will get loses if drugs are not handled first.
Any current Dianetic case failures are from flubby Dianetic auditing or
the person has been on drugs or alcohol which were not handled by
Dianetics.
It hasn't harmed anyone to omit drug handling. But it made it hard or
impossible to get stable case gain.
THUS ANY DIANETIC PC WHO HAS HAD DRUG HANDLING OMITTED MUST BE RUN ON
DRUGS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BEFORE MORE AUDITING IS GIVEN.
I repeat, drugs or alcohol in most instances make a resistive case so
the point must be handled before the case will attain and hold case gain.
ANY PC WHO IS NOT MAKING IT IN AUDITING SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR A DRUG OR
ALCOHOL HISTORY.
DISCOVERY
In investigating a series of cases who were not making it. I found in
each one that the person had been on drugs or alcohol and that drugs or the
alcohol had not been run out.
Drug data was not covered fully enough in the Dianetics pack. Only
Prior Assessment to Drugs was given.
Thus I have found several Dianetic pcs were only run on the Prior
Assessment to Drugs. This is not good enough as it is only a partial
handling.
FULL DRUG RUNDOWN
Here is the full New Era Dianetics Drug Rundown.
0. The Original Assessment Sheet. Ask the pc each question on the
Original Assessment Sheet. Mark all reads. Make sure you get specific
and complete answers to your questions.
NOTE: On Item E, do not ask the pc for whole track drugs. You want
only drugs medicine or alcohol he has taken this lifetime.
1. Objective ARC.
(Ref: HCOB 19 Jun 78 New Era Dianetics Series 3, OBJECTIVE
ARC.)
2. Sweat Out Program if LSD or Angel Dust has been taken. This step can
be done concurrently with other drug handling.
(Ref: HCOB 30 Apr 78 SWEAT PROGRAM FURTHER DATA
HCOB 6 Feb 78R LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM
HCOB 6 Feb 78R-1 LSD AND THE SWEAT PROGRAM ADDITION )
3. A battery of Objective Processes. This includes CCHs 1-10, SCS on an
Object and SCS.
(SOP 8C and Op Pro by Dup are included in later steps of the Drug
Rundown.)
4. Hard TRs Course for ex-drug users or alcoholics. A Hard TRs Course
consists
of TRs 0-9.
Ref: HCOB 16 Aug 71R TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED
HCOB 7 May 68 UPPER INDOC TRs
BPL 18 Sep 78 NEW ERA DIANETICS HARD TRs COURSE)
5. Full Dianetic C/S-1 to educate the pc so he fully understands
Dianetic procedure and is able and willing to be audited successfully.
(Ref: HCOB 9 Jul 78 DIANETIC C/S-1 )
6. Narrative Handling on Drugs-First.
All drugs, medicine and alcohol which the pc has taken in this
lifetime have been listed on the Original Assessment Sheet.
At this point, choose the best reading drug, alcohol or medicine from
the Original Assessment Sheet and run it out R3RA Quad Narrative. (For
example: "Return to the time you took whiskey and tell me when you are
there.")
YOU DO NOT CHECK INTEREST ON DRUG ITEMS.
RUN OUT EACH READING DRUG, ALCOHOL OR MEDICINE ON THE DRUG LIST (IN
ORDER OF READ) BY R3RA QUAD NARRATIVE FIRST. Otherwise, you can end up
spinning the pc way down the track.
In running narrative on this lifetime drug. medicine or alcohol
individual items you will find that it is easier to do if you run
earlier beginning and earlier incident rather than attempt to limit him
to the first this lifetime incident he comes up with, as there will
usually be more than one incident when he took whiskey, for example. So
you always ask earlier beginning but if it is necessary you ask earlier
incident with the question, "Is there an earlier incident when you took
whiskey?"
Pcs commonly tend to wind up way back down the whole track at this
stage of their auditing and that is not what you're aiming for here
either. What you're interested in is this lifetime, this body. But this
doesn't mean you don't run track on the Drug Rundown; just don't push
it. And never insist the pc run any type of chain when he says there's
nothing there.
When all reading drugs, medicines, alcohols on the list have been run
to EP by R3RA Narrative Quad, go on to the next step.
7. Preassessment on Each Reading Drug, Medicine or Alcohol Taken in This
Lifetime.
A) Choose the best reading drug, alcohol or medicine from the
Original Assessment Sheet and do a preassessment on it.
"Are (preassessment item) connected with taking (the drug, medicine
or alcohol)? "
is the preassessment question.
B) Take the best reading preassessment item off the preassessment
and ask the pc:
"What (best reading preassessment item) are connected with taking
(the drug, medicine, or alcohol)?"
This is the running item list question for that particular drug. You
write this question at the top of the page and write down exactly
what the pc said, noting any read that occurred when he said it.
C) Take up the best reading running item (make sure you noted
reads as the pc gave you the items) and run it R3RA Quad.
DO NOT CHECK INTEREST ON DRUG ITEMS.
D) Handle all reading running items found in Step B in order of
read with R3RA Quad.
E) Using that same original drug item repeat Step A.
F) Repeat Steps B to E.
Fa) Using the first original item continue Steps A. B. C, D, E
until the Preassessment List simply F/Ns.
Fb) Take the next individual drug, medicine, or alcohol item that
read on the original list and repeat Steps A to Fa on it until you
have handled every item that read on the Original Assessment Sheet.
G) When there are no more items unhandled on the original list
that read and no further items reading, but there are some unrun
original items on the list, null with Suppress and Invalidate
buttons.
H) Run any now reading items with Steps A to Fb.
I) Use up the whole list of drugs in this way, doing the
preassessment and Steps B to H on all reading drugs. Reassess the
drug list. Handle per above instructions any drug which now reads.
This is done until the entire drug list F/Ns when called. (Note:
If, during the rundown the pc thinks of other drugs he has taken in
this lifetime, add them to the original list with their reads
noted, and handle them in turn according to size of read, ensuring
you run them R3RA Quad Narrative first. )
8. The Prior Assessment.
A) Using the drug list obtained on the Original Assessment, take
up the largest reading drug, medicine or alcohol, ask the pc the
following preassessment question:
"Prior to taking (the best reading drug, medicine or alcohol), were
there (preassessment item)?"
B) Take the best reading preassessment item and ask:
"What (preassessment item) did you have prior to taking (the drug,
medicine or alcohol)?"
C) Use full preassessment steps and run out all reading running
items R3RA Quad.
D) Reassess any remaining unrun items found in Step B to see if
they now read. If they do, run them. Also check for any more items
the pc has to add to the list, and mark down their reads as the pc
gives them.
E) Repeat above steps on any items that now read.
F) When there are no more items to add and no more items reading,
but there are some unrun items on the list, null with Suppress and
Invalidate buttons.
G) Run any now reading items R3RA Quad.
H) Reassess the Preassessment List, using the drug, medicine
or alcohol in Step A. Follow remaining steps until all reading
items are taken to EP and there are no further reads on
reassessment of the Preassessment List.
I) Take up the next best reading drug, medicine or alcohol from
Step A. Repeat Steps B to I.
The above prior assessment steps are done on each drug, medicine or
alcohol that has read. They are handled in order of largest read.
9. More Objectives.
The final step of the Drug Rundown, when all above steps are fully
complete. is to run another set of Objectives on the pc.
These are:
A) SOP 8C
B) OP PRO BY DUP
run in that order, each to its complete EP.
This is done to bring the pc fully into present time. and it will be
a present time which he is now far better able to confront.
_______
This completes the Drug Rundown.
The Sweat Out Program, if not yet complete by this time, is carried
through to completion .
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:lfg.dr.jk
Copyright � 1971, 1978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1971R
REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Interiorization
Pack (Revisions in this type style)
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Interiorization Rundown Series 11
URGENT
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN-
CORRECTION DRILL: DATE TO BLOW/LOCATE TO BLOW
It usually happens that an Interiorization Rundown (also known as Int-
Ext RD for Interiorization-Exteriorization Rundown) is-
1. Done when not necessary.
2. Is flubbed in R3RA.
3. Is overrun.
UNNECESSARY
The Int buttons must be assessed FIRST, then any reading button or
buttons cleared. If a button has read on an MU it must be cleared, then
reassessed. If an Int button is validly reading, one does the Int Rundown,
per HCOB 4 Jan 71R, Int RD Series 2, EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA, THE INT
RD REVISED.
(Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears would be run instead on The End of
Endless Int Repair RD as they cannot be run on Dianetics. This rundown is
also well suited as a preliminary action for weak or ill pcs who may be
unable to run engrams or secondaries. Ref: HCOB 24 Sept 78, Issue I, Int RD
Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RD.)
If there aren't any reads on the Int buttons even after Suppress,
Inval, Misunderstood and False have been applied to the Int button list,
one does NOT do an Int Rundown on the pc as it is unnecessary and
classifies as "running an unreading item."
When this test is omitted you get an unnecessary Int RD being done on a
pc.
This will eventually have to be repaired.
FLUBBED R3RA
When the auditor does not do flubless auditing, errors occur in the
auditing itself. These will hang up an Int RD.
OVERRUN
It usually happens that an Int RD is overrun. The EP is reached on Flow
2, let us say. The auditor keeps on going past the win.
This will hang up the rundown.
One of the ways an overrun occurs is the pc goes exterior during it. Yet
the auditor keeps on.
Another way is pc has a big cog, big win. Auditor keeps going on with
the RD.
REASON FOR ERRORS
The Int RD is a simple and precise REMEDY which stabilizes a pc after
exteriorizing and permits him to be further audited.
When a pc exteriorizes in session it is the end phenomena for that
process or action. One gently ends off in any case. If the pc has not had
an Interiorization Rundown, it is vital, in his next session, to check Int
(as above) as the first action. All manner of physical and emotional upsets
can result, including a high TA, if this step is omitted.
INT MUST BE CHECKED AS THE NEXT ACTION AFTER THE FACT OF THE PC'S FIRST
EXTERIORIZATION.
No other auditing is to be done before Int is handled fully or proves
to be uncharged upon checking.
One reason unnecessary Int RDs get done is that the Registrar sells
one. That makes the Reg a C/S. So the C/S and auditor run it.
Maybe it wasn't needed.
So if it wasn't needed it will eventually have to be repaired.
HEADACHES
Headaches are a symptom (not every headache is) of a needed or an
incorrect Int RD.
CORRECTION DRILL
The following is the Correction Drill for an Int RD.
Ninety percent of the pcs run on Int need it.
REQUIREMENTS
An auditor before being allowed to go near a pc Int RD correction must
have:
1. Word cleared the Int RD pack.
2. Must have good TRs.
3. Must be good with a meter.
4. Must know and use the Auditor's Code.
5. Must have completed the starrate checkouts per Int RD Series
14.
6. MUST DO THIS DRILL ON A DOLL UNTIL HE IS FLAWLESS.
Then he can be trusted to do an Int RD correction.
This is the drill (written by a Class XII auditor for use on Flag):
Drill-Int-Ext Repair No. 1
FAILED INT/EXT RD REPAIR
DATE TO BLOW-LOCATE TO BLOW
1. By C/S or prepared list read, Int appears overrun.
2. Auditor: "We're going to take a look at the subject of going into
things and your Int RD."
3. Auditor: "What was the first time in your auditing that you were
willing to go into things? "
4. Auditor establishes by pc answer to above and any further 2WC if (a)
a flat point exists in or as a result of auditing (or training), (b)
the pc feels the Int RD is unflat (c) the pc has misunderstoods on the
RD, or (d) the pc never had any trouble with going in and out of things
or being audited after exterior. The pc and auditor are satisfied with
what they establish above.
5. If (a) flat point, auditor establishes what the point was. If (b)
unflat, the auditor does an Int RD Correction List or L3RF, if needed.
If it does turn out that the Int RD was overrun or unnecessary the
auditor proceeds per this drill. If (c) misunderstoods, the auditor
clears them up with the pc and then finds out if it was overrun, unflat
or unnecessary and handles per this drill. If (d) unnecessary, the
auditor indicates it was an unnecessary action and gets an F/N.
6. The Int RD was overrun and the flat point has been established per
Step 5. The auditor tells the pc, "We're going to date that point in
years, months, etc., ago until something blows off-some mass or energy,
etc. I want you to tell me as soon as that happens. Alright?"
7. If the pc is confused about "blow" the auditor can do a demo by
putting his hand on the pc's arm and taking it away suddenly.
8. When the pc understands what's expected of him, the auditor
establishes the order of magnitude by asking the pc, "Was it years or
months ago?"
9. The auditor gets the years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds and
fractions of seconds ago to a point when something blows and F/Ns. If
the pc gives up on this only then does the auditor meter date the flat
point to a blow-F/N.
10. If a big BD occurs and the auditor suspects a blow but the pc will
not originate it, the auditor can ask the pc if it blew.
11. If no blow occurs the auditor verifies each part of the date and
corrects where necessary to a blow-F/N. If still no blow-F/N the
auditor then checks for an earlier flat point. If there is one, the
auditor dates that point to a blow-F/N. If still no blow-F/N the
auditor does an L3RF "On your Int RD" and handles fully.
12. When the date has gone to a blow-F/N and the F/N has been indicated
the auditor tells the pc, "Now we're going to spot the exact location
where that flat point occurred, until something blows off. I want you
to tell me when that happens. Alright?" The auditor is getting the PAST
physical universe location.
13. The auditor clears the words stars, planet, galaxy, location, point,
if this is the first time Date/Locate is being done on the pc.
14. When the pc understands what's expected of him the auditor begins the
Locate steps.
15. The auditor says, "Point to that location." The pc points with
his finger until he is satisfied he has the exact direction. Then the
auditor goes down the rest of the steps to a blow-F/N.
Distance?
Exact?
What galaxy?
What star?
What planet?
What country?
What city?
What street?
What house?
Position on street?
What room?
Distance from front of house?
Where in the room?
How far from each wall?
How far off the floor?
How far from the ceiling?
(NOTE: This step is not rote. Use the questions that apply. For
example, if it occurred "next door" you wouldn't ask "What galaxy?",
etc.)
16. If, while locating, the pc starts running the incident or gives too
much "scene" the auditor has the pc point again then continues from
where he left off on the locate steps.
17. If at some point on these steps the location turns out to be in the
middle of the ocean or in a field, etc., the auditor uses available
landmarks or reference points to get the location (i.e. distance from
nearest point of land? or distance from the big rock?) down to a blow-
F/N.
18. If no blow-F/N, the auditor verifies each part of the Locate step and
corrects any necessary to a blow-F/N.
19. If the auditor suspects a blow but the pc doesn't originate it, the
auditor asks, "Did something blow?" If the auditor suspects he's gone
past a blow he can check "Did it blow previously?" If so and no F/N the
auditor rehabs by asking the pc how long ago that happened and gets the
F/N.
20. If no blow after verifying the location, or after checking for an
earlier location blow, the auditor then has to do an L3RF "On your Int
RD" and handle fully.
NOTE: A blow is a definite manifestation and the pc must say
"something blew" or "it disappeared" or "it's gone" or "it vanished,"
not "I feel lighter."
IMPORTANT
The Date/Locate steps must NOT be done robotically. One has to
understand the mechanics of how it's done and why.
If the pc says "two years ago" on dating, one doesn't then ask "What
galaxy?" on the Locate step, as of course it's this one. Or what star,
etc., either. If you start asking "What galaxy?" on an incident on Earth
the pc is thrown back track.
If it happened outside a town in the open you wouldn't ask what city,
house, or street or room, either.
On dating, it's AGO or it is an actual date. When the pc has it, the
auditor doesn't then alter-is it in sequence. Found by years-months-days-
hours- minutes-seconds and fractions, one doesn't then call it by day,
year, month, as it tangles the pc. It's called back in the same order.
AND in dating one calls the date found back to the pc if there was no
instant blow while it was being found. It usually blows on the call of it
after it's known.
AND in locating the same thing occurs. If no blow and it seems correct
then the location is called back to the pc.
The essence of the drill is to bring a pc to PT by erasing the date by
spotting and the location by spotting, as the pc is out of PT fixed by both
date and location.
If the theory is not understood nobody could do it rotely.
This is a highly precise action to be done smoothly with good TRs. Its
results are phenomenal.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt. jh.k jm
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 OCTOBER 1971RA
Remimeo REVISED 14 MAY 1974
Auditors Cl IV RE-REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
and above
C/Ses (Revisions NOT printed in a different type style)
Int RD Chksht
Cl IV Grad
Chkshts
Interiorization Rundown Series 12
INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST
REVISED
PC: DATE:_____________________
PC GRADE: AUDITOR: _________________
The purpose of this list is to correct an unflat, overrun or otherwise
messed up Int RD.
This list is used when:
A) The subject of Int/Ext reads on a repair list and the Int RD
has already been run.
B) A bog occurs on the Int RD itself. An L3RF would first be used
to detect any Dianetic errors.
C) The pc is upset after the Int RD or the End of Endless Int
Repair RD, has head somatics, high or low TA, or is not VGIs on the
subject of going into things.
NOTE 1: Per HCOB 12 Sep 78, URGENT. IMPORTANT, DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON
CLEARS AND OTs, Dianetic Clears, Clears and OTs are not to be audited
on the Int RD as it uses Dianetics. They may be given the End of
Endless Int Repair RD as it is a Recall Process.
The following list may be assessed on Dianetic Clears, Clears and OTs,
however, as: 1) it also applies to the End of Endless Int Repair RD and
2) the pc may have been run on the Int RD before the above HCOB was
issued.
If a Dianetic Clear, Clear or OT reads on any question which calls for
a Dianetic handling (Ex: Questions 2. 3, 4, 7, 9, 29) the Dianetic
handling is not done. Do NOT engage in. any activity that brings about
further engram running.
The correct action, if you get a read on one of the above questions, is
to indicate it and let the pc tell you about it if he wishes, to bring
it to an F/N.
Where the handling calls for an L3RF, an L3RF could be assessed, but
you must not do more than indicate the reading questions. You must not
engage in engram running.
Otherwise, the handlings given on the Int RD Correction List may be
done on Clears and OTs. A Clear or OT who then has any further
unresolving Int trouble would be referred to an AO for handling.
NOTE 2: If the pc has had only the End of Endless Int Repair RD do not
assess those questions marked with an asterisk (*) (Questions 2, 3, 4,
29) or do any repair action that calls for Dianetics.
Assess this list Method 3.
Take up each item that reads and get the reading item fully repaired to
F/N. Suppress and False can be used as needed to take a question to F/N.
Handle each read to F/N. Do not go on to another question leaving one that
has not F/Ned.
If at any time while doing the list the pc has a big win with F/N,
VGIs, acknowledge, indicate the F/N and end off. Do not take the list
beyond a major win for the pc.
R-FACTOR: We are going to do an assessment concerning the subject of
interiorization. (If pc does not understand this R-Factor clear up what the
Int RD or the End of Endless Int Repair RD was as he may not have
recognized it.)
____________
1. ON YOUR INT HANDLING IS A RECALL FLOW UNFLAT? ______
Assess the following, using the Int button the pc has been run on.
Is recall a time when you (Int button) unflat? ______
Is recall a time when you caused another (Int button) unflat? ______
Is recall a time when others caused others (Int button) unflat?
______
Is recall a time when you caused yourself (Int button) unflat?
______
(Assess on Quad pcs only.)
For Int RD: Flatten the unflat flow(s) to F/N, cog, VGIs.
For End of Endless Int Repair RD: Pick up the unflat flow and handle
to four F/Ning flows on that Int button. Then reassess the Int
buttons, as the entire RD may not have been flattened and will now
need to be.
*2. ON YOUR INT RD WAS A CHAIN OR INCIDENT LEFT UNFLAT? ______
Find out which one(s). Handle with an L3RF.
*3. (NOTE: ASSESS No. 3 ONLY ON PCs WHO'VE HAD THE ORIGINAL INT RD, NOT
THE REVISED INT RD.)
IS A SECONDARY FLOW UNFLAT? ______
L3RF and handle.
*4. IS AN ENGRAM FLOW UNFLAT? ______
L3RF and handle.
5. WAS SOME PART OF YOUR INT HANDLING MISRUN? ______
Find out what.
For Int RD: handle with an L3RF any messed up chains.
For End of Endless Int Repair RD: straighten out any messed up recall
flows and handle per No. 1 above.
6. DID YOU RUN THE CONCEPT OF "BEING IN" OR "BEING STUCK IN" INSTEAD OF
THE CONCEPT OF "GOING IN?" ______
Sort it out. Find out what was run. Handle any confusions. If it
is established that he didn't run the concept of "going in" on
whatever the running button was, check the button for read. If it
reads, run the Int RD or End of Endless Int Repair RD properly. Do not
run the RD if the button doesn't read.
7. WERE YOU RUNNING AN ITEM THAT WAS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE ASSESSED?
______
Indicate it. Get the item the pc was actually running and take it to
full EP if not yet flat. Then recheck the item that was assessed, put
in Suppress and Inval as necessary, and if charged run the item that
was assessed (on whichever RD the pc had).
8. DID THE INT BUTTON ASSESSED HAVE NO CHARGE ON IT? ______
Indicate the button was uncharged and should not have been run and
all actions connected with it should not have been run. D/L if
necessary.
9. WAS THERE ANOTHER INT BUTTON THAT SHOULD HAVE READ? ______
Get what it was and note its read as the pc gives it. Find out if the
Int button that was taken up instead is charged. If so, complete any
handling on it to F/N. If not, handle as in No. 8 above. Then handle
the new item, if charged, on Int RD or End of Endless Int Repair RD,
whichever applies.
10. ON YOUR INT HANDLING WERE YOU RUN ON A RECALL FLOW THAT HAD NO CHARGE
ON IT? ______
Find out which one and indicate that that flow should not have been
run.
11. CAN'T YOU GET IN? ______
If so, L&N to BD F/N item "Who or what was afraid to go into things?"
Then run alternate repetitively "What did (item found) do?" "What did
(item found) withhold?" to an F/N and a blow.
12. DO YOU HAVE AN OUT-LIST?
Handle with L4BRA.
13. WAS THE RUNDOWN DONE OVER AN ARC BREAK? ______
PROBLEM? ______
WITHHOLD? ______
OVERT? ______
Indicate and handle to F/N.
14. WAS THE RUNDOWN DONE OVER SOME OTHER BYPASSED CHARGE? ______
Find out what and handle.
15. WAS THE WORDING OF THE RUNDOWN BADLY CLEARED? ______
Fully clear all MUs to F/N.
16. ON YOUR INT HANDLING WAS THERE A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD? ______
Fully clear all MUs to F/N.
17. WERE YOU CONFUSED ABOUT SOMETHING? ______
Clear it up with the correct references. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
18. DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THE RD WAS FOR? ______
Clear this up with correct references. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
19. WERE YOU THINKING OF LEAVING DURING INT? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
20. WERE YOU LEAVING A POST? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
21. WERE YOU TRYING TO GET A POST? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
22. ANYTHING TO DO WITH JAILS? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
23. ARE YOU WANTED ANYWHERE? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
24. ARE YOU AFRAID THAT IF YOU GET OUT YOU WILL CAUSE DAMAGE? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
25. WOULD LETTING YOU OUT BE AN OVERT? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
26. HAVE YOU FAILED TO GET OUT IN AN EARLIER RELIGION OR PRACTICE?
______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. Note for C/S to handle earlier practices on
program.
27. DO YOU JUST MOVE BACK INTO THE BODY AND PUSH AGAINST IT? ______
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
28. WERE THERE AUDITOR ERRORS? ______
Indicate. Sort it out and clean up BPC. If R3RA errors, use an L3RF
(except for Clears, etc.), L1C if necessary.
*29. WERE THERE ERRORS ON ENGRAMS? ______
Find out what and handle with an L3RF.
30. (ASSESS ONLY ON DN CLEARS, CLEARS OR OTs.) WERE YOU AUDITED ON
DIANETICS AFTER GOING DIANETIC CLEAR OR SCN CLEAR? ______
Indicate that he should not have been run on Dianetics after Clear.
If no F/N, D/L when he went Clear.
31. HAS INT BEEN NEGLECTED FOR A LONG TIME? ______
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
32. ARE YOU WORRIED BECAUSE INTERIORIZATION CONTINUES TO READ? ______
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
33. ARE YOU CONCERNED BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO BE REVIEWED? ______
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
34. WAS THE INT RD (END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RD) ALREADY FLAT? ______
Indicate. Date/Locate the flat point.
35. WAS YOUR INT HANDLING OVERRUN? ______
Indicate. Date/Locate the flat point.
36. WAS INT HANDLING UNNECESSARY IN THE FIRST PLACE? ______
Indicate. If no F/N, Date/Locate the point he felt good about going
into things.
37. DID YOU FEEL FINE ABOUT GOING INTO THINGS TO BEGIN WITH? ______
Indicate it. If no F/Ns Date/Locate that point.
38. IS YOUR INT HANDLING PERFECTLY OKAY? ______
Indicate. If no F/N, Date/Locate the point he felt good about going
into things.
39. HAS YOUR INT HANDLING BEEN OVERREPAIRED? ______
Indicate. Date/Locate the flat point.
40. HAS INT BEEN RUN SEVERAL TIMES OVER? ______
Indicate. Date/Locate the flat point.
41. HAS THE INT RD CORRECTION LIST BEEN OVERDONE? ______
Indicate. If no F/N Date/Locate the point he felt his Int RD was
repaired.
42. ON YOUR INT HANDLING DID YOU GO PAST A WIN?
Indicate. Rehab the win to F/N VGIs. If no F/N, Date/Locate that
point.
43. DURING YOUR INT HANDLING DID YOU GO EXTERIOR? ______
Indicate. Rehab to F/N VGIs. If no F/N, Date/Locate that point.
44. IS THIS ACTION UNNECESSARY? ______
Indicate. If no F/N itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
45. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? ______
Find out what and handle.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1971, 1974, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971RC
Remimeo REVISED 29 JULY 1976
Class IV Grad RE-REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978
Checksheet
Checksheet (Revisions in this type style)
Class IV Grad (Ellipses indicate deletions)
and above
auditors
C/Ses
Ethics Officers
PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED
References:
BPL 5 Apr 72RC I PTS TYPE A HANDLING
BPL 31 May 71RG PTS/SP CHECKSHEET
HCOB 20 Jan 72R PTS RD ADDITION
HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST
HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76
C/SING A PTS RD
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RD, FINAL STEP
HCOB 24 Apr 72 l C/S Series 79
PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING
HCOB 9 Nov 67 REVIEW AUDITORS BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES,
REVISION OF REMEDY A, REMEDY B AND S AND Ds
HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds BY BUTTON
HCOB 16 Aug 69R HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY
CASES
One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena."
PTS means potential trouble source. When someone is suppressed he
becomes a potential trouble source.
There are numerous HCOBs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true
observations and predictions.
The cause of ROLLER-COASTER is PTS. Roller-coaster means a slump after
a gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS.
S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are
still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without
change.
Now with the PTS Rundown, this common and all too frequent case
condition can be handled.
WHO DOES IT
There are actually three PTS handlings:
1. This is essentially an ethics action done by the Ethics Officer. Its
substance is contained in BOARD POLICY LETTER 5 Apr 72RC Issue I, PTS TYPE
A HANDLING. It is usually the first step at any sign of trouble. It is not
an audited action, it is an interview. The PTS person is given a program in
order to handle the scene.
2. This is the PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED as covered in this HCOB, in HCOB 20 Jan
72R, PTS RD ADDITION and in HCOB 3 Jun 72RA. It is done by an auditor in
regular session as described in these HCOBs.
. . . It can be done by Class IV Grads who are also HNEDAs, HGC Okay to
Audits.
For an auditor who is not HNEDA, Class IV Grad Okay to Audit HGC by
competent interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the
pc as it needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping
and very honest auditing and competent C/Sing.
3. The third handling is THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN, HCOB 29 Dec 78, and
HCOB 30 Dec 78R-the SUPPRESSED PERSON RD PROBLEMS PROCESSES. It is done by
a qualified auditor in regular session. Essentially, it handles the OTHER
person connected to the pc.
Therefore, what you have here is THREE stages of handling PTSness. The
first above, the interview, cools off the scene and in many cases that is
that. But when the pc is further affected by the connection and roller-
coasters, he is given the audited rundown as in 2 above. This usually
handles the case of PTSness as a case. But there sometimes remains another
person, the SP person or group and its relationship in the real universe to
the pc. And this is handled with 3 above.
CLEARS, OTs AND DIANETIC CLEARS
The Dianetic steps of the PTS Rundown, Audited are not run on Clears,
OTs or Dianetic Clears. (Ref: HCOB 12 Sep 78, DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS
AND OTs.)
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears can of course be given the interview
step (1 above) and can be given the Suppressed Person Rundown as in 3 above
as neither contains any handling of engrams.
DEVELOPMENT
Early discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively
covered.
The recent wrap-up came about through my OT research in November 1971.
The principle breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate
having known certain people before.
This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people
thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous
characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But
people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running
them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks
through for a stalled Dianetic case.
In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you
were
" for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain
individuals before this life.
But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and
lasting and can cause a roller-coaster comes from having known the person
before this life.
Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that
life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds.
BREAKDOWN
There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown.
1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list. TRs
out, metering out, poor R3RA, just plain untrained or not totally
familiar with this rundown.
2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is
a no change case but no EXGF 40RD done, old auditing not repaired by .
. . proper programing or . . . pc too tired or too ill for the R3RA.
3. The rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left
incomplete (pc will still roller-coaster).
4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a
full Drug Rundown.
There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS
Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the
PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3RA or out-TRs or poor metering it
really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing
it are especially rough.
Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard
practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with
engram running.
The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted
the pc roller-coasters, not when he collapses with a temperature.
Roller-coaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int
repair, out-lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be
gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted.
The prerequisites for a PTS RD are covered in 2 and 4 above. It is not
restricted to Ex Dn but is a separate RD developed before Ex Dn.
BEHAVIOR OF RD
Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be
noted on the worksheet.
The R3RA can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be
sure with an L3RF. But get the postulate off the basic no matter how hard
you have to work at it. In the PTS RD incidents can "develop." Missing
pieces can appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes
to F2 after finishing F1.
Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this rundown.
And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied
by this rundown.
END PHENOMENA
There is a point where the pc is absolutely sure he knew the person
before this life. This is NOT the EP.
A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but can require an
Int RD if none has been done before . . .).
THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN
ROLLER-COASTERS.
FLOWS
You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this
fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc.
Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place).
Flow 3 is the person (or place) to others.
Flow 0 is the pc to himself because of the person (or place).
If you did F1 R3RA as "Locate a time you knew " you might get to the
pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean
motivator F1. This would leave the PTS chain partially run.
This is also true of the ruds.
RE-DOS
If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above
should be checked into.
Then the lists and R3RA should be handled with L4BRA and L3RF.
Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and
handled. There is no question of the validity of the rundown. It might have
missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such
obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in)
the other person.
Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before.
SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
Here are the issues that directly cover the rundown:
BPL 5 Apr 72RC PTS TYPE A HANDLING
HCOB 9 Dec 71RC PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED
HCOB 20 Jan 72R PTS RD ADDITION
HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST
HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76
C/Sing A PTS RD
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RD, FINAL STEP
HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds BY BUTTON
HCOB 16 Aug 69R HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY
HCOB 20 Apr 72 II C/S Series 78
HCOB 15 Dec 68RA L4BRA
HCOB 24 Apr 72 I C/S Series 79
PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING
THE RUNDOWN
A. PAST S&Ds:
1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been
verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder.
_________
2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads
handle per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check
for validity. _________
3. R3RA Triple/Quad the item using these commands:
F1. Locate a time when _____did something to you. R3RA.
F2. Locate a time when you did something to _____. R3RA.
F3. Locate a time when_____did something to others. R3RA.
F0. Locate a time when you did something to yourself because
of _____. R3RA. _________
4. Triple/Quad ruds and overts on the item using these commands:
(a) Did _____ARC break you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(b) Did you ARC break _____? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N.
(c) Did _____ARC break others? ARCU CDEINR.
(d) Did you ARC break with yourself because of_____? ARCU
CDEINR. _________
ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S.
(e) Did _____give you a problem? E/S to F/N.
(f) Did you give_____ a problem? E/S to F/N.
(g) Did _____give others problems? E/S to F/N.
(h) Did you give yourself problems because of_____? E/S to
F/N. _________
(i) Did you withhold anything from _____? E/S to F/N.
(j) Did _____withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N.
(k) Did _____withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N.
(I) Did you withhold anything from yourself because of _____?
E/S to F/N. _________
(m) Did _____commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N.
(n) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on _____? E/S to
F/N.
(o) Did _____commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N.
(p) Did you commit an overt on yourself because of _____? E/S
to F/N. _________
5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforced Hav" with these steps:
(a) Clear "can't have," "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING
TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT
WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an
example or two.
(b) Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as
motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the Flow 3
terminal to others, others to terminal (four flows of two
commands each, or five if pc Quad).
(c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective
Havingness should be run.
THE COMMANDS:
F1. Did _____run a can't have on you? Tell me about it.
Did _____force something on you you didn't want? Tell me
about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F2. Did you run a can't have on _____? Tell me about it.
Did you try to force something on _____that he (she, it)
didn't want? Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to
EP.)
F3. Did _____run a can't have on others? Tell me about it.
Did _____force something on others they didn't want? Tell
me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F3A. Did others run a can't have on _____? Tell me about it.
Did others force something on _____that he (she, it)
didn't want? Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to
EP.)
F0. Did you run a can't have on yourself because of _____?
Tell me about it.
Did you try to force something on yourself that you didn't
want because of _____? Tell me about it.
(Alternate/repetitive to EP.) _________
-OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS-
6. Handle all past S&D items per above steps. _________
B. PAST PTS INTERVIEWS:
7. Collect up all past PTS interview items (which should have
already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups). _________
8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so reads handle
as below. _________
9. R3RA Triple/Quad the item. _________
10. Triple/Quad ruds and overts on the item. _________
11. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav.
_________
12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS interview items.
_________
C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds):
13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCOB 16 Aug 69R, HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY,
ASSESSMENT AND L&Ns. _________
14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads.
_________
15. R3RA Triple/Quad the item. _________
16. Triple/Quad ruds and overts on the item. _________
17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav.
_________
18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other items if valid. _________
D. TROUBLED/WORRIED:
19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or
worried you? to BD F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother, wife
or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents,
lovers.) _________
20. Check item for known before, if it so reads: _________
21. R3RA Triple/Quad. _________
22. Triple/Quad ruds and overts. _________
23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav. _________
E. BEEN AFTER:
24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item.
_________
25. Check known before and if it reads: _________
26. R3RA Triple/Quad. _________
27. Triple/Quad ruds & overts. _________
28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _________
F. PLANETS:
29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N
item. _________
30. R3RA Triple/Quad. _________
31. Triple/Quad ruds and overts. _________
32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _________
33. D of P interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be
sure the person is now all right (not PTS). _________
READING FLOWS
Each flow of each process on the rundown is checked for a read before
it is run. This includes Dianetics, ruds, Can't Hav/Enforced Hav. You do
not run unreading flows.
REPAIR
Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BRA, L3RF, . . . and .
. . C/S 53 if necessary.
A really big snarl up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with
HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD CORRECTION LIST.
If pc gets ill or roller-coasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD
CORRECTION LIST HCOB 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared
up.
SUMMARY
The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each
aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled
thoroughly before it is delivered.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.dr
Copyright � 1971, 1974. 1976, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 DECEMBER 1971 RB
Remimeo REVISED 19 SEPTEMBER 1974
Int RD RE-REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Checksheet
HGC Auditors (Revisions in this type style)
Cl IV Grad (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Checksheet
C/S Series 35RB
Interiorization RD Series 10
INTERIORIZATION ERRORS
REFERENCES:
HCOB 11 Apr 71 RC IMPORTANT L3RF, DN & INT RD REPAIR LIST
HCOB 16 Sep 78 POSTULATE OFF EQUALS ERASURE
HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2, EXT AND HIGH TA, THE INT
RD REVISED
HCOB 24 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT,
END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RD
HCOB 24 Sep 78 II Int RD Series 13, PREASSESSMENT AESPs
AND INT
Almost all the errors in an Interiorization Rundown are Dianetic
errors. Most are very ordinary, even corny.
IT IS VITAL TO CORRECT AN INT RD ERROR AS A FIRST ACTION.
There is one Int RD error that is not a purely Dianetic error and that
is the error of doing anything else at all before an Int RD is done
properly or an Int RD error is fully corrected.
The Int RD error may be . . . that the Int button run did not read on
the meter, or read only because of an MU on the word, yet . . . was run.
(HCOB 4 Jan 71R.) This classifies as "running an unreading item."
A common Int error is that the pc is not cleared on the concept of
interiorization and the words and commands, so he is being audited over
misunderstoods.
Or the Int RD could have been overrun. The EP is reached on . . . F2,
let us say. The auditor keeps on going past the win. This will hang up the
rundown. One of the ways an overrun occurs is the pc goes exterior during
it. Yet the auditor keeps on. Another way is pc has a big cog, big win.
Auditor keeps going on with the RD.
When a pc is exteriorized by auditing and is then audited further
without being given an Interiorization Rundown, his TA will go high or low
and he may be very upset. Heavy masses may come in and he may also get ill.
Int RD errors also may go back to earlier Dianetic errors. A number of
unflat incidents invite the overrun of these if they also occur on a
Dianetic chain.
To clean up a balled-up Int RD chain or incident one may have to find
and clean up the Dianetic error it is sitting on during the clean-up of the
Int RD error.
Int RD errors, goofs, etc., are handled by using an Int RD Correction
List Revised, HCOB 29 Oct 71RA.
This must be excellently metered so that the original error is not further
compounded by misassessment of the correction list and a falsely reading
item taken up.
Auditors who can't run ordinary R3RA with great success should not be
let near an Interiorization RD as their lack of smoothness in handling
Dianetics will wreck the Int RD.
Auditors who cannot read a meter flublessly should not be let near an
Int RD or an Int RD Correction List, or The End of Endless Int Repair RD.
CLASS IV GRAD, HNED AUDITORS
An excellent Class IV Grad, HNED auditor can easily repair a messed-up
Interiorization Rundown after a folder study and by use of an Int RD
Correction List Revised, HCOB 29 Oct 71RA and, as indicated, The End of
Endless Int Repair RD, HCOB 24 Sep 781, Int RD Series 4.
A Class IV Grad, HNED auditor with an excellent Dianetic record of wins
can be given an Int RD to do or to correct IF HE IS STARRATED ON THE INT
PACK AND THE TWO-WAY COMM PACK.
REPAIR
Wherever you see a TA high and a pc in trouble your first suspicions
should be:
1. Audited past Ext in auditing without an Int RD being done.
2. Int RD botched by being unnecessary (none of the Int buttons read or
read only on MUs), or overrun or auditor goofs in the session.
3. A previously messed-up Dianetic action has gotten fouled up with the
Int RD.
4. The Int command was improperly cleared (such as "means go in and out
again" "means trapped" "meant leaving," etc.).
5. Firefights and worries over the high or low TA have ensued after an
Int ball-up has occurred.
6. Some major action like grades or items of Power have been run twice.
7. A C/S has hopefully kept on getting the pc audited without detecting
the real reason as a flubbed Int RD, and without getting the Int RD and
any repair fully FESed.
PERCENTAGES
The percent of misrun Int RDs is high, many being unnecessary or
overrun.
The liability of leaving them unrepaired is high.
Reasons for high TA are averaging out close to 100% as an unrun or a
flubbed and unrepaired Int RD.
EXT IN SESSION
When a pc exteriorizes in session it is the end phenomena for that
process or action. One gently ends off in any case. If the pc has not had
an Interiorization Rundown, it is vital, in his next session, to check Int
(per HCOB 24 Sep 71R INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN CORRECTION DRILL-DATE TO
BLOW/LOCATE TO BLOW) as the first action. All manner of physical and
emotion upsets can result, including a high TA, if this step is omitted.
INT MUST BE CHECKED AS THE NEXT ACTION AFTER THE FACT OF THE PC'S FIRST
EXTERIORIZATION.
No other auditing is to be done before Int is handled fully or proves
to be uncharged upon checking.
If even years after an Int RD the pc has a high TA or a low TA then Int
trouble is at once suspected and the original Int RD and any repair of it
is suspect and must be handled.
The Int RD Correction List Revised (HCOB 29 Oct 71RA) has been designed
to straighten out Int RD errors. L3RF handles the Dianetic errors. Where
Int Correction Lists have been done and the pc still has headaches or other
Int troubles a thorough FES must be done FIRST on any Int repairs and the
Int RD itself BEFORE another correction list or other action is ordered.
Isolate any errors and get them cleaned up by an auditor who can read a
meter and run and repair Dianetics standardly.
If Int troubles persist and the C/S is certain that any and all errors
have been fully repaired & cleaned off the line, he orders The End of
Endless Int Repair RD (HCOB 24 Sep 781, Int RD Series 4). This should
totally handle Int.
Or if the C/S is in doubt about how to handle and gets into a mess
trying to repair chains, he can cut directly onto the End of Endless Int
Repair Rundown and he will get someplace.
There is no real trick to either running a correct Int RD or repairing
a flubbed one.
The whole clue is whether or not the auditor can audit plain ordinary
garden variety R3RA, and is able to read a meter.
So when ANY auditor audits a pc past exterior and the pc's TA goes high
he should be checked out fully on the Int RD Checksheet so he won't
continue to commit the error.
And when ANYONE is going to run an Int RD he must:
A. Be an expert New Era Dianetics auditor and Class IV Graduate.
B. Be starrated on all the Int RD Series.
C. Be able to read a meter flublessly.
And when any C/S is confronted with high TAs or low TAs and doesn't
handle at once by getting an Int RD properly run or properly repaired he
must be rechecked on the New Era Dianetics pack and the Int RD pack.
DN C/S 1
A very careful Dianetic C/S 1 must be done on a previously
unindoctrinated pc before he is run on an Int RD.
Otherwise it's all too new.
A C/S 1 isn't auditing.
The pc who can't do what the auditor says or can't correct an erroneous
action is lost.
A fully safe pc would be one who when he goes Ext in auditing is made to do
the Hubbard New Era Dianetics Course at once before he even gets any ruds
put in and not audited again until he is a Hubbard New Era Dianetics
Auditor. He'd be a pc who was relatively safe.
A pc who does what an inexpert auditor says without question can really
get fouled up! Uneducated pcs require really flawless topnotch auditors.
The auditor who can audit an uneducated pc is a jewel. He really has to
know his business. Because the pc does whatever he says. And if he says
wrongly, then there goes the session. Ever notice pc corrections in a
worksheet? "I think you bypassed an F/N." "This feels overrun." "I had
Grade 1 last year." Such auditors are not fully enough trained to handle
wholly green pcs!
SIMPLICITY
Honest fellows, it's as easy to run an Int RD as it is to run "an ear
pain."
It isn't even mysterious or tough.
IT IS ONLY VERY IMPORTANT TO DETECT WHEN IT NEEDS TO BE DONE OR
REPAIRED.
There are no mysteries.
Some auditors have got me feeling like I'm trying to teach them to chew
soft bread!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.dr
Copyright � 1971, 1974, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 DECEMBER 1971RB
Remimeo (HCOB 2 December 1970 Revised)
Int RD REVISED 30 MARCH 1974
Chksht RE-REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Chkshts (Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)
Interiorization Rundown Series 15
C/S Series 23RB
INTERIORIZATION SUMMARY
Int Rundowns can be hugely successful, but also INTERIORIZATION CAN BE
BADLY MISRUN.
The following references cover the subject of
interiorization/exteriorization:
HCOB 4 Oct 78 Int RD Series 1
Interiorization Handling Simplified
HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2
Exteriorization and High TA,
The Interiorization Rundown Revised
HCOB 30 May 70R Int RD Series 3
Interiorization Intensive; 2-Way Comm
HCOB 24 Sep 78 1 Int RD Series 4 Urgent Important
The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown
HCOB 25 Sep 78 1 Int RD Series 5
Quad Commands for Int Buttons
HCOB 11 Apr 70R Int RD Series 6
Auditing Past Exterior
HCOB 6 May 70R Int RD Series 7
Blows-Auditing Past Exterior
HCOB 20 Aug 70R Int RD Series 8
Interiorization Rundown Musts
HCOB 13 Jan 71R Int RD Series 9
Exteriorization
HCOB 16 Dec 71RB Int RD Series 10, C/S Series 35RB
Interiorization Errors
HCOB 24 Sep 71R Int RD Series 11
Interiorization Rundown Correction
Drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow
HCOB 29 Oct 71RA Int RD Series 12
Int Rundown Correction List Revised
HCOB 24 Sep 78 11 Int RD Series 13
Preassessment, AESPs and Int
HCOB 25 Sep 78 11 Int RD Series 14
Starrate Checkouts for Interiorization Rundown
HCOB 17 Dec 71RB Int RD Series 15, C/S Series 23RB
Interiorization Summary
HCOB 16 Oct 78 11 Int RD Series 16, C/S Series 102
C/S Checklist of Int Errors
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
Issue II Urgent, Important, Routine 3RA, Engram Running
By Chains
BTB 12 Jan 75 Quads Reinstated
HCOB 4 Apr 71-1RB C/S Series 32RA-1RB
Use of Quad Dianetics
HCOB 21 Apr 70 2-Way Comm C/Ses
HCOB 3 Jul 70 C/S Series 14
Two-Way Comm
HCOB 17 Mar 74 TWC Checksheets, TWC, Using Wrong Questions
The examination of Interiorization Rundowns done in the field discloses
that some auditors engaged in running it have not been fully checked out on
it. HCO PL 26 Aug 1965 gives the correct way to do a starrate checkout.
Clay demos must also be correctly done. These are covered in HCOB 11 Oct
1967 and HCOB 10 Dec 1970/.
These HCOBs on starrates and clay demos, the Int RD Series, the above-
listed issues on R3RA, Engram Running by Chains (New Era Dianetics Series
6RA), 2-Way Comm Sessions, and Quads, make the necessary pack for checking
out an auditor before letting him near an Int Rundown. And all
interiorization materials as above MUST BE CHECKED OUT STARRATE AND IN CLAY
before a C/S permits one of his auditors to run it on a pc.
UNNECESSARY
The Int buttons MUST be assessed before clearing, and then any reading
button cleared before it is run. The auditor must ensure that if a button
read on an MU it is first cleared, then reassessed for read. If one or more
of the buttons is validly reading, one does an Int Rundown per HCOB 4 Jan
71R, Int RD Series 2, Exteriorization and High TA, The Int Rundown Revised.
If there aren't any reads, even after Suppress, Invalidate,
Misunderstood, and False have been applied to the Int button list, one does
NOT do an Int Rundown on the pc as it is unnecessary and classifies as
"running an unreading item."
When this test is omitted you get an unnecessary Int RD being done on a
pc.
This would eventually have to be repaired.
FLUBBED R3RA
When the auditor does not do flubless auditing, errors occur in the
auditing itself. These will hang up an Int RD.
QUADS OR TRIPLES
DO NOT RUN A PC ON FLOW ZERO FOR THE FIRST TIME ON INT. A TRIPLE PC CAN
BE QUADED AFTER INT HANDLING IS COMPLETE, BUT IT IS NEVER DONE ON INT
HANDLING OR INT REPAIR. (Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R.)
OVERRUN
It usually happens that an Int RD is overrun. The EP is reached on F2,
let us say. The auditor keeps on going past the win.
This will hang up the rundown.
One of the ways an overrun occurs is the pc goes exterior during it.
Yet the auditor keeps on.
Another way is pc has a big cog, big win. Auditor keeps going on with the
RD. (HCOB 24 Sep 71R, Rev. 24.9.7B, Int RD Series 11, Urgent,
Interiorization Rundown -Correction Drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow.)
Also see HCOB 24 Sep 781, Urgent Important, The End of Endless Int
Repair RD.
REPAIR OF INT
If even years after an Int RD the pc has a high TA or a low TA, then
Int trouble is at once suspected and the original Int RD and any repair of
it is suspect and must be handled. (HCOB 16 Dec FORD, C/S Series 35RB, Int
RD Series 10, Interiorization Errors.)
The Int RD Correction List Revised (HCOB 29 Oct BRA) has been designed
to straighten out Int RDs. L3RF handles the Dianetic errors. Where Int
Correction Lists have been done and the pc still has headaches or other Int
troubles a thorough FES must be done FIRST on any Int repairs and the Int
RD itself BEFORE another correction list or other action is ordered.
Isolate any errors and get them cleaned up by an auditor who can read a
meter and run and repair Dianetics standards
With any errors cleaned off the line, if Int troubles persist the C/S
orders The End of Endless Int Repair RD (HCOB 24 Sep 781, Int RD Series 4).
(HCOB 16 Dec ORB, C/S Series 35RB, Int RD Series 10, Interiorization
Errors.)
TWO-WAY COMM
There is a two-way comm step that follows a day or so after an
Interiorization Rundown.
An auditor doing this step, preferably the same auditor, MUST BE
CHECKED OUT ON TWO-WAY COMM.
No C/S should permit any auditor to do any 2-way comm until the auditor
has been checked out on:
HCOB 21 Apr 70, 2-Way Comm C/Ses
HCOB 3 July 70, C/S Series 14, C/Sing Two-Way Comm
HCOB 17 Mar 74, TWC Checksheets, TWC, Using Wrong Questions
and has been drilled on two-way comm until he can do it correctly and
comfortably.
PREASSESSMENTS, AESPs NOT USED ON INT
The Int Rundown and its repair do NOT include the use of New Era
Dianetics preassessment (nor any form of AESPs).
The rule is: WHEN HANDLING INT YOU ADDRESS ONLY INT, NOTHING ELSE. DO
NOT RUN PREASSESSMENT OR AESPs ON INT. (HCOB 24 Sep 7811, Int RD Series 13,
Preassessment, AESPs and Int.)
C/SING INT
The correcting of an Interiorization Rundown is far harder than making
sure that auditors can do the usual in the first place.
Nearly all a C/S's hard work comes from auditors not well trained on
courses (indifferent courses) and failing to check auditors out well on the
materials before permitting them to deliver a new rundown.
The correction of Int is hard since until it is complete, other auditing is
inadvisable. One however, gets the Int Rundown done.
The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown has vastly simplified the
handling of Int repair. (Ref: HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4, Urgent
Important The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown.)
INT IS A REMEDY
The Int RD is a simple and precise REMEDY which stabilizes a pc after
exteriorizing and permits him to be further audited.
When a pc exteriorizes in session it is the end phenomena for that
process or action. One gently ends off in any case. If the pc has not had
an Interiorization Rundown, it is vital, in his next session, to check Int
(per HCOB 24 Sep OR, Rev. 24 Sep 78, Int RD Series 11, Urgent,
Interiorization Rundown Correction Drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow) as
the first action. All manner of physical and emotional upsets can result,
including a high TA, if this step is omitted.
INT MUST BE CHECKED AS THE NEXT ACTION AFTER THE FACT OF THE PC'S FIRST
EXTERIORIZATION.
No other auditing is to be done before Int is handled fully or proves
to be uncharged upon checking.
One reason unnecessary Int RDs get done is that the Registrar sells
one. That makes the Reg a C/S. So the C/S and auditor run it.
Maybe it wasn't needed.
So if it wasn't needed it will eventually have to be repaired. (HCOB 24
Sep 71R, Rev. 24 Sep 78, Int RD Series 11, Urgent, Interiorization Rundown
Correction Drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow). (Repair with an Int RD
Correction List Revised HCOB 29 Oct 1971RA and/or an End of Endless Int
Repair RD, HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4.
The Interiorization Rundown is a REMEDY designed to permit the pc to be
further audited after he has gone exterior.
In the case of Dianetic Clears or Son Clears and OTs, as they are not
to be audited on Dianetics, the REMEDY would be the End of Endless Int
Repair RD.
The Int Rundown is NOT to be sold or passed off as a method of
exteriorizing a pc. Nor is the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown. This is
very important.
It is general auditing on usual Dianetics and Scientology actions that
brings about Exteriorization .
When the pc goes or is found to be exterior and Int proves to be
charged on checking one then orders the Interiorization Rundown. Otherwise
the TA will misbehave.
The rundown is a REMEDY USED AFTER EXTERIORIZATION HAS OCCURRED BY
REASON OF GENERAL AUDITING.
Anxiety to get exterior will prompt a pc to buy and a Registrar to sell
an Interiorization Rundown. It is in effect just more auditing as far as
the Registrar is concerned. When a pc has gone exterior the Registrar can
insist on his buying enough hours for the remedy.
The Int Rundown stabilizes the exteriorization and makes it possible to
audit the pc further.
DISABILITY
If an auditor can't smoothly audit a rundown as simple as an Int
Rundown, then he is exposed as being unable to run standard Dianetics and
should be cleared of his misunderstoods and overts and retrained.
The only real trouble one gets into on an Int Rundown stems from the
inability of the auditor to run a smooth, good TRed R3RA session. Pcs are
not hard to run on it.
C/S WINS
A C/S cannot win at all if he is continually having to make up for
flubby auditing by the auditor.
Therefore the C/S must be very sure his auditors are fully checked out
on things they are to run before running them.
If there is no Qual Staff Training Officer or no cramming, a C/S can
fully afford to do the training and cramming himself. Otherwise he will
lose far more than that time in C/Sing for auditors not checked out.
By the skill of his auditors you know the C/S. Not by his unusual
solutions after flubs.
The Int Rundown is too easy to do to have any trouble-the trouble comes
when the auditors are not checked out beforehand, starrate and in clay on
new things they are to run.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
(Updated with recent LRH
data by order of
L. Ron Hubbard by
Training & Services Bureau)
Re-revised by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:MH:ntm.jk
Copyright � 1970, 1971, 1974, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 JANUARY 1972RB
REVISED & REISSUED AS HCOB
Remimeo 20 NOVEMBER 1974
REVISED 10 FEBRUARY 1977
(Revisions in this type style)
CANCELS
BTB OF 1 JANUARY 1972R
SAME TITLE
LIX HI-LO TA LIST REVISED
(Cancels earlier list HCOB 17 Feb 71
and 22 Feb 71 and 25 Feb 71 and 3 March 71
and 13 March 71 and 1 Jan 72.)
This assessment has been developed to detect all the reasons for high
and low TA. There is nothing unusual about the processes necessary to
handle these points. This is the full list and is used when a C/S Series
53RK has been done and the high or low TA persists.
Interiorization or a flubbed Interiorization R/D that must be run with
WENT IN is the usual reason. Listing errors and out-rudiments are another
reason.
The list is assessed Method 5. Handle the reads in the order given on
HCOB 10 June 71, C/S Series 44R. Any reading questions must be carried to
F/N by major action or 2-Way Comm. Can be taken to full F/Ning list.
Must be done by an auditor who can make a list read with cramming on
TR1 and cramming on HCOBs 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24, 9 June 71 C/S Series 41,
20 Dec 71 C/S Series 72, 15 June 72 C/S Series 80, 15 Oct 73 C/S Series 87,
20 Nov 73 C/S Series 89, 6 Dec 73 C/S Series 90 and BTB 16 June 71R Issue
II (formerly HCOB 16 June 71R Issue II).
HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT
1A. IS YOUR INT R/D UNFLAT? _________
If the pc has had an Int R/D, do an Int
R/D Correction List and handle the reads.
(HCOB 29 Oct 71, Revised 14 May 74.) If the pc has never had
an Int R/D, then give him a standard Int R/D providing you
have checked out on the Int-Ext pack and have drilled the pro
cedure.
2A. WAS YOUR INT R/D MESSED UP? _________
Int R/D Correction List.
3A. IS YOUR INT R/D OVERRUN? _________
Int R/D Correction List.
4A. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER EXTERIOR? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
5A. ARE YOU TRAPPED? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
6A. YOU WENT IN. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
7A. GO IN. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
8A. ARE YOU OUT AND CAN'T GET IN? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
9A. ARE YOU IN AND CAN'T GET OUT? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
10A. ARE YOU URGENTLY TRYING TO LEAVE? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
11A. DO YOU WANT TO GET OUT? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
12A. WERE YOU KICKED OUT OF SPACES? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
13A. YOU CAN'T GO. _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
14A. HAVE YOU EVER INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
15A. HAVE YOU EVER GONE INTO SOMETHING? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
16A. DO YOU WANT TO GO INTO SOMETHING? _________
Int R/D Correction List or Int R/D.
_________
1B. IS THERE A LIST ERROR? _________
Do an L4BR on the earliest lists you can find that have not
been corrected. Lacking these, do an L4BR in general. You can
go over an L4BR several times handling each read to F/N until
the whole L4BR gives nothing but F/Ns.
2B. HAS A LIST BEEN OVERLISTED? _________
Find out which and handle with an L4BR.
3B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG ITEM? _________
L4BR and handle.
4B. ARE YOU UPSET WITH GIVING ITEMS TO THE
AUDITOR? _________
L4BR and handle.
5B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG INDICATION? _________
L4BR and handle.
6B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG WHY? _________
L4BR on the Why Finding. Get the correct Why.
7B. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN A WRONG PTS ITEM? _________
L4BR on that PTS interview. Watch for earlier out PTS inter
views and if they exist, L4BR the earliest one. Watch for
earlier S&Ds and if out, correct the earliest of each kind with
an L4BR.
8B. ARE YOU NOT SATISFIED WITH AN ITEM FOUND
ON THE LIST? _________
L4BR. Correct the list.
9B. HAVE READING ITEMS BEEN LEFT CHARGED UP? _________
L4BR and handle if L&N lists otherwise spot them and clean
them by taking to F/N.
10B. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN GIVEN A WRONG DATE? _________
Correct the date. L4BR if pc upset.
11B. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN GIVEN A WRONG LOCATION? _________
Correct the location. L4BR if pc upset.
12B. HAVE YOU EVER FELT BAD AFTER A LISTING AND NULLING ACTION IN SESSION?
_________
Find what list and L4BR. Handle each session by finding the
list and do an L4BR on that list.
13B. HAVE YOU EVER FELT BAD AFTER A WHY FINDING WAS DONE? _________
L4BR on Why Finding.
14B. HAVE YOU EVER FELT BAD AFTER A PTS INTERVIEW? _________
L4BR on the interview.
15B. HAVE YOU EVER FELT BAD AFTER A CRAMMING ACTION? _________
L4BR on the cramming action.
16B. HAVE YOU LISTED TO YOURSELF OUT OF SESSION? _________
L4BR on listing out of session.
17B. DID YOU EVER FEEL YOU WERE NOT GIVEN A CORRECT WHY? _________
L4BR on the Why Finding.
18B. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN ASSIGNED A WRONG CONDITION? _________
L4BR on being assigned wrong conditions.
19B. HAS ANYTHING IN LIFE ACTED LIKE AN OUT-LIST? _________
L4BR what turns up.
20B. HAVE TWO-WAY COMM QUESTIONS EVER ACTED LIKE A LIST ACTION?
_________
L4BR.
21B. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN LABELLED A WHO INCORRECTLY? _________
L4BR.
22B. HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED SOME OTHER TYPE OF BPC ON LISTING AND NULLING
ACTIONS? _________
L4BR.
_________
1C. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
2C. HAVE YOU ARC BROKEN ANOTHER? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
3C. HAVE OTHERS ARC BROKEN SOMEONE ELSE? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
4C. HAVE YOU ARC BROKEN YOURSELF? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
5C. DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
6C. HAVE YOU GIVEN A PROBLEM TO ANOTHER? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
7C. HAVE OTHERS GIVEN A PROBLEM TO SOMEONE ELSE? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
8C. HAVE YOU GIVEN YOURSELF A PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
9C. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING SOMETHING? _________
Get what. 2WC E/S to F/N.
10C. IS ANOTHER WITHHOLDING SOMETHING FROM YOU? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
11C. ARE OTHERS WITHHOLDING SOMETHING FROM SOMEONE ELSE? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
12C. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING SOMETHING FROM YOURSELF? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
13C. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? _________
PROBLEM? _________
WITHHOLD? _________
Indicate it and handle E/S to F/N.
14C. HAVE YOU EVER HAD A SESSION ARC BREAK? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
15C. HAVE YOU EVER ARC BROKEN ANOTHER IN SESSION? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
16C. HAVE OTHERS EVER ARC BROKEN SOMEONE ELSE IN SESSION? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
17C. HAVE YOU CAUSED YOURSELF TO HAVE A SESSION ARC BREAK? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
18C. HAVE YOU EVER HAD A PROBLEM WITH A SESSION? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
19C. HAVE YOU CAUSED SOMEONE TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A SESSION?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
20C. HAVE YOU CAUSED YOURSELF TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A SESSION?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
21C. HAVE YOU WITHHELD ANYTHING IN A SESSION? _________
Get what. 2WC E/S to F/N.
22C. HAS ANOTHER WITHHELD FROM YOU IN A SESSION? _________
Get what. 2WC E/S to F/N.
23C. HAVE OTHERS WITHHELD FROM SOMEONE ELSE IN A SESSION? _________
Get What. 2WC E/S to F/N.
24C. HAVE YOU WITHHELD SOMETHING FROM YOURSELF IN SESSION? _________
Get what. 2WC E/S to F/N.
25C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU HAD AN ARC BREAK? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
26C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU ARC BROKEN ANOTHER? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
27C. IN LIFE HAVE OTHERS ARC BROKEN SOMEONE ELSE? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
28C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU ARC BROKEN YOURSELF? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
29C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU HAD A PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
30C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU GIVEN A PROBLEM TO SOMEONE ELSE? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
31C. IN LIFE HAVE OTHERS GIVEN A PROBLEM TO SOMEONE ELSE? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
32C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU GIVEN A PROBLEM TO YOURSELF? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
33C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU HAD A WITHHOLD? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
34C. IN LIFE HAS ANOTHER WITHHELD SOMETHING FROM YOU? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
35C. IN LIFE HAVE OTHERS WITHHELD SOMETHING FROM SOMEONE ELSE?
_________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
36C. IN LIFE HAVE YOU WITHHELD SOMETHING FROM YOURSELF? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
37C. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK OF LONG DURATION? _________
ARCU CDEINR.
38C. HAS ANOTHER HAD AN ARC BREAK OF LONG DURATION WITH YOU?
_________
ARCU CDEINR.
39C. HAVE OTHERS HAD AN ARC BREAK OF LONG DURATION WITH SOMEONE ELSE?
_________
ARCU CDEINR.
40C. HAVE YOU HAD AN ARC BREAK OF LONG DURATION WITH YOURSELF?
_________
ARCU CDEINR.
41C. DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM OF LONG DURATION? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
42C. HAVE YOU GIVEN ANOTHER A PROBLEM OF LONG DURATION? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
43C. HAVE OTHERS GIVEN SOMEONE ELSE A PROBLEM OF LONG DURATION?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
44C. HAVE YOU GIVEN YOURSELF A PROBLEM OF LONG DURATION? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
45C. DO YOU HAVE A WITHHOLD OF LONG DURATION? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
46C. HAS ANOTHER HAD A WITHHOLD FROM YOU OF LONG DURATION? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
47C. HAVE OTHERS HAD A WITHHOLD OF LONG DURATION FROM SOMEONE ELSE?
_________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
48C. HAVE YOU HAD A WITHHOLD FROM YOURSELF OF LONG DURATION?
_________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
49C. HAVE YOU EVER EXPERIENCED SOME OTHER SORT OF ARC BREAK?
_________
ARCU CDEINR.
50C. HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED SOME OTHER SORT OF PROBLEM? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
51C. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU MAY HAVE WITHHELD? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
52C. HAVE YOU EVER NOT-ISED AN OUT-RUD? _________
Get what and handle per above.
53C. HAVE YOU EVER SUPPRESSED AN OUT-RUD? _________
Get what and handle per above.
54C. HAVE OUT-RUDS EVER BEEN INVALIDATED? _________
Get what and handle.
55C. ARE THERE ANY UNDISCLOSED OUT-RUDS? _________
Get what and handle.
56C. HAVE YOU EVER STUDIED OVER OUT-RUDS? _________
Get what and handle.
57C. IS THERE SOME OTHER SORT OF WITHHOLD? _________
Get what and handle per above.
58C. Is THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU ARE NOT SAYING? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
59C. Is THERE ANYTHING YOU DON'T WANT TO SAY? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
60C. Is THERE SOMETHING YOU DON'T LIKE? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
61C. ARE YOU PROTESTING ANYTHING? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
62C. DO YOU FEEL SAD? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
63C. DO YOU FEEL RUSHED? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
64C. DO YOU FEEL TIRED? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
65C. DO YOU FEEL UPSET? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
66C. DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOU CAN'T GET IT? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
67C. HAS ANOTHER COMMITTED OVERTS ON YOU? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
68C. HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
69C. HAVE OTHERS COMMITTED OVERTS ON OTHERS? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
70C. HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS ON YOURSELF? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
71C. ARE YOU NOT-ISING ANY OVERTS? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
72C. HAVE YOU COMMITTED CRIMES? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
73C. ARE YOU COMMITTING CRIMES IN PT? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
74C. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
75C. IS THERE A LIE? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
76C. ARE YOU HIDING FROM SOMEONE OR SOMETHING? _________
2Wc to F/N.
77C. DO YOU HAVE CONSIDERATIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
78C. DO YOU HAVE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
79C. ARE YOU HERE FOR UNDISCLOSED REASONS? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
80C. DO YOU HAVE UNDISCLOSED PROBLEMS? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
81C. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU'RE NOT TELLING YOUR AUDITOR ? _________
Get what. 2Wc to F/N.
82C. Is YOUR ATTENTION NOT ON YOUR CASE IN SESSION? 2Wc to F/N.
83C. DO YOU FEEL AFRAID TO BE AUDITED? _________
2Wc to F/N.
84C. ARE YOU AFRAID SOMETHING WILL BE FOUND OUT ABOUT YOU? _________
2Wc to F/N.
85C. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING YOUR ACTUAL CASE STATE? _________
2Wc to F/N.
86C. ARE YOU NOT TELLING YOUR AUDITOR YOUR COGNITIONS? _________
2Wc to F/N.
87C. ARE YOU UNWILLING TO TALK TO THE AUDITOR? _________
2Wc to F/N.
88C. DO YOU HAVE DISAGREEMENTS? _________
2Wc to F/N.
89C. ARE YOU A WARE OF SOME OTHER SORT OF OUT-RUD? Get what and handle.
90C. HAS ANYONE EVER TOLD YOU YOU HAD AN ARC BREAK WHEN YOU DIDN'T?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
91C. HAS ANYONE EVER SAID YOU HAD A PROBLEM WHEN YOU DIDN'T?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
92C. HAS ANYONE EVER SAID YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN'T?
_________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
93C. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN WRONGLY ACCUSED OF HAVING OVERTS? _________
2Wc to F/N.
94C. DO YOU FEEL YOU'RE REALLY DOING FINE? _________
2Wc to F/N.
_________
1D. ARE YOU TAKING OR SMOKING DRUGS?
2WC to F/N.
Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N.
If pc has had a Drug R/D, do L3RD on it and handle.
Program the pc for a Drug R/D or verification of it if it is
incomplete or there are "no interest" items.
2D. DID YOU ONCE TAKE DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. Rehab releases on each drug to F/N. L3RD on
Drug R/D if he had one. Program for Drug R/D or verification
if incomplete.
3D. HAVE YOU TAKEN LSD? _________
2WC to F/N. Drug rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had
one. Program for full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
4D. HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________
2WC to F/N. Drug/alcohol rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if
he had one. Program for full Drug R/D or verification if
unflat.
5D. HAVE YOU SMOKED POT? _________
2WC to F/N. Drug rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D if he had
one. Program for full Drug R/D or verification if unflat.
6D. ARE YOU TAKING MEDICINE? _________
2WC to F/N. Drug/medicine rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D
if he had one. Program for full Drug R/D or verification if
unflat.
7D. DID YOU ONCE TAKE MEDICINE? _________
2WC to F/N. Drug/medicine rehabs. L3RD on Drug R/D
if he had one. Program for full Drug R/D or verification if
unflat.
8D. DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO TAKE DRUGS? _________
2WC to F/N. Rehab releases on each "drug" taken to F/N.
If pc has had a Drug R/D, do L3RD on it and handle.
Program the pc for a Drug R/D or verification of it if it is
incomplete or there are "no interest" items.
9D. DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO SMOKE POT? _________
Handle per above.
10D. DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO DRINK ALCOHOL? _________
Handle per above.
11 D. HAVE YOU TA KEN SOME DRUG NOT COVERED ? _________
2WC to F/N. Rehab releases. If pc already had a Drug R/D,
do L3RD on it and handle. Program the pc for a Drug R/D
or verification of it if it is incomplete and run the new
drug just found.
12D. IS YOUR DRUG R/D UNFLAT? _________
2WC to F/N. L3RD on Drug R/D. Program to flatten
Drug R/D.
13D. WAS YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN OVERRUN? _________
Date-Locate the flat point.
14D. WERE THERE ITEMS NOT RUN BECAUSE YOU WEREN'T INTERESTED?
_________
2WC to F/N. L3RD on "your Drug R/D."
Program to run the no interest items.
15D. IS THERE A DRUG THAT HAS BEEN MISSED? _________
2WC to F/N. Rehab releases. L3RD on "Drug R/D."
Program to complete the Drug R/D.
16D. IS THERE SOME ALCOHOL THAT HAS BEEN MISSED? _________
Handle per above.
17D. HAS A MEDICINE BEEN MISSED? _________
Handle per above.
18D. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT ACTS LIKE A DRUG? _________
Handle per above.
19D. ON YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN IS THERE AN UNFLAT PROCESS ON RECALLS?
_________
2WC to F/N. Program to flatten the Recalls and L3RD on the Drug R/D.
20D. ON YOUR DRUG R/D IS THERE AN UNFLAT SECONDARY CHAIN? _________
L3RD on the secondary chain. Then L3RD on your Drug R/D.
21D. ON YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN ARE THERE ANY UNFLAT ENGRAMS? _________
L3RD on unflat engrams on your Drug R/D.
22D. ON YOUR DRUG R/D IS THERE SOME MISSED WHOLE TRACK DRUG, MEDICINE OR
ALCOHOL? _________
2WC to F/N. L3RD on Drug R/D. Program to finish the Drug R/D and run
the missed drug, medicine or alcohol.
23D. ARE YOUR OBJECTIVES UNFLAT? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to flatten.
24D. WERE YOUR OBJECTIVES OVERRUN? _________
Rehab the releases.
25D. DO YOU STILL FEEL THE SAME ABOUT DRUGS, MEDICINE OR ALCOHOL?
_________
2WC to F/N. If pc has had a Drug R/D do an L3RD. Program to complete
Drug Rundown or do one if never had.
26D. IS THERE NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR DRUG R/D? _________
2WC to F/N.
27D. DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN HAS BEEN OVERREPAIRED?
_________
Date-Locate flat point of repair of Drug R/D.
1E. IS THERE AN ENGRAM IN RESTIMULATION? _________
Find out which and do L3RD and handle per its instructions.
2E. ARE THERE UNFLAT CHAINS? _________
Find out what chains and L3RD on each.
3E. DO YOU HAVE A STUCK PICTURE? _________
Indicate it. Do an L3RD on it. You can also unstick it by
having him recall a time before it and recall a time after it.
D/L if necessary. C/S can order Picture and Masses Remedy
Dn done after this list is handled-if necessary.
4E. DO YOU HAVE PICTURES IN RESTIMULATION? _________
L3RD and handle. Pictures and Masses Remedy Dn.
5E. DO YOU HAVE MASSES IN RESTIMULATION? _________
L3RD and handle. Pictures and Masses Remedy Dn.
6E. HAS THE SAME ENGRAM BEEN RUN TWICE? _________
L3RD and handle.
7E. YOU CAN'T SEE ENGRAMS TOO WELL? _________
Do L3RD Method 5 and handle. Program for L3RD
Rundown if necessary.
8E. IS IT INVISIBLE? _________
Spot the invisible field or picture. L3RD on it and handle.
9E. IS IT ALL BLACK? _________
Spot the black field or picture. L3RD on it and handle.
10E. HAS THERE BEEN A LOSS? _________
Do L3RD on it and handle. Run it out R3R Triple if not run
out and still not handled.
11E. HAVE YOU LOST ANYTHING? _________
Do L3RD on it and handle. If not yet run out and still
unhandled run R3R Triple.
12E. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON R3R PROCEDURE? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for an Auditing C/S-1.
13E. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON AUDITING? _________
2WC to F/N. Program for an Auditing C/S-1.
14E. DO YOU HAVE TROUBLE GOING WHOLE TRACK? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle with whole track remedies.
15E. HAVE YOUR DIANETIC ITEMS NOT BEEN TRIPLED? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to Triple Dianetics.
16E. HAVE YOUR DIANETIC ITEMS NOT BEEN QUADED UP? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to Quad Dianetics.
17E. HAVE YOU RUN ANYTHING QUAD WHEN YOU WERE A TRIPLE PC? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle with FFD.
18E. ARE THERE ANY UNRUN FLOWS? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to put in unrun flows.
19E. A RE THERE A N Y MISSED FLOWS? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle missed flows.
20E. DO YOU BLOW INCIDENTS BY INSPECTION? _________
2WC to F/N. If 2WC shows Dianetic auditing is charged
do L3RD on your Dianetic auditing.
21 E. DO YOU HAVE ANY PERSISTENT MASSES? _________
2WC to F/N. L3RD on persistent masses.
22E. IS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG WITH INCIDENTS? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle what comes up.
23E. WERE COMMANDS WRONG? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle what comes up.
24E. DO INCIDENTS FAIL TO ERASE? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle what comes up.
25E. IS IT ALL OK? _________
2WC to F/N.
_________
IF. HAS THE SAME THING BEEN RUN TWICE? _________
Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
2F. HAS THE SAME ACTION BEEN DONE BY ANOTHER
AUDITOR? _________
Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
_________
1G. ARE YOU DOING SOMETHING WITH THE MIND
BETWEEN SESSIONS? _________
Find out what it is. If yoga or mystic exercises or some such,
2WC E/S to first time done, find out what upset had occurred
before that and if TA now down, do L1C on that period of
pc's life.
2G. ARE YOU INVOLVED IN SOME OTHER PRACTICE? _________
Find out what it is. If yoga or mystic exercises or some such,
2WC E/S to first time done, L1C on the prior upset or period
of pc's life just before that.
3G. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED PAST EPs ? _________
2WC to F/N. Rehab the EPs that were audited past.
4G. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED PAST A BLOW? _________
2WC to F/N. Date to blow. Locate to blow.
5G. HAVE YOU EVER PROTESTED AN ACTION? _________
Itsa E/S to F/N.
6G. ARE YOU INVOLVED IN SOME OUT-ETHICS? _________
Get what. 2WC to F/N.
7G. DO YOU FEEL YOU HAVE TO HANDLE YOUR OWN CASE
AFTER SESSION? _________
2WC to F/N.
8G. DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE AN AUDITOR? _________
2WC to F/N.
9G. IS IT NO AUDITING? _________
2WC to F/N.
_________
1H. ARE THERE WORD CLEARING ERRORS? _________
Do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all reads.
2H. ARE THERE ANY MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS? _________
Find and clear them up. Use a WCCL, handle all reads.
3H. ARE THERE ANY MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS IN SESSION? _________
Find and clear them up. Use a WCCL if necessary.
4H. ARE THERE STUDY ERRORS? _________
2WC to F/N and add a Student Rehabilitation List (HCOB
15 Nov 74) or full Study Correction List (BTB 4 Feb 72RC)
to the pc's program.
5H. ON STUDY IS THERE SOME OTHER KIND OF BPC? _________
2WC to F/N. Program to handle what comes up.
1I. HAVE YOU EVER HAD TROUBLE WITH YOUR TA
OR F/Ns? _________
Use HCOBs 24 Oct 71R, 12 Nov 71RA, 18 Nov 72, 29 Feb
72, 23 Nov 73RA, all on False TA. Then clean up the
bypassed charge with 1) Assess for best read a) TA worries
b) F/N worries. 2) Then 2WC times he has worried about
(item) E/S to F/N. 3) Rehab any overruns due to false TA
obscuring F/Ns.
2I. HAVE YOU HAD A FALSE TA? _________
Handle as in 1I.
3I. ARE YOU USING THE WRONG SIZED CANS? _________
Handle as in 1I.
4I. DO YOUR HANDS GET TIRED IN AUDITING? _________
Handle as in 1I.
5I. ARE YOUR HANDS DRY? _________
Handle as in 1I.
6I. ARE YOUR HANDS WET? _________
Handle as in 1I.
7I. DO YOU LOOSEN YOUR GRIP ON THE CANS? _________
Handle as in 1I.
8I. ARE YOU USING THE WRONG HAND CREAM? _________
Handle as in 1I.
9I. HAVE YOU HAD TA HASSLES? _________
Assess for best read (a) TA worries (b) F/N worries.
2WC times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N.
Rehab the overruns due to false TA obscuring F/Ns.
101. ARE YOU WEARING ANY TIGHT CLOTHING? _________
Handle as in 11.
111. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE CAUSING FALSE TA? _________
Find out what it is and handle as in 11.
_________
1J. HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING? _________
2WC to first time. L1C on the prior upset or if prior upset
was in auditing use the appropriate correction list and L1C
on that time.
2J. WAS A WRONG OVERRUN FOUND? _________
Correct it to F/N by indication and rehabbing the right
overrun.
3J. HAS THERE BEEN AN OVERRUN IN LIFE? _________
Locate, indicate, rehab to F/N.
4J. HAS THERE BEEN AN OVERRUN IN AUDITING? _________
Locate, indicate, rehab to F/N.
5J. HAS THERE BEEN SOMETHING WRONG WITH F/Ns? _________
Indicate. 2WC E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
6J. HAVE F/Ns BEEN OVERRUN? _________
Indicate. 2WC E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
7J. HAVE F/Ns NOT BEEN INDICATED? _________
Indicate. 2WC E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
8J. HAVE F/Ns BEEN MISSED? _________
Indicate. 2WC E/S to F/N. Rehab if necessary.
9J. HAVE AUDITING QUESTIONS NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD? _________
2WC, get them properly understood with Word Clearing,
E/S if needed to F/N.
10J. COULDN'T HEAR THE AUDITOR? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
11J. COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING SAID? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
12J. COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
13J. HAVE ITEMS NOT REALLY READ? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
14J. DID YOU SAY SOMETHING MUST HAVE READ? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
15J. WERE YOU STILL UPSET WHEN SOMEBODY THOUGHT IT WAS HANDLED?
_________
Find and handle to F/N.
16J. HAVE YOU HAD BAD AUDITING? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
17J. ARE THERE INCOMPLETE ACTIONS? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
18J. HAS THERE BEEN ANY INVALIDATION? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
19J. HAS THERE BEEN ANY EVALUATION? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
20J. COULDN'T YOU GET AUDITING? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
21J. HAVE THERE BEEN INTERRUPTIONS? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
22J. DOES YOUR AUDITOR OVERWHELM YOU? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
23J. DO YOU FEEL ATTACKED? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
24J. ARE YOU SCARED OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IN AUDITING? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
25J. ARE YOU TALKING TO OTHERS ABOUT YOUR CASE? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
26J. ARE YOU LISTENING TO OTHERS TALK ABOUT THEIR CASES? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
27J. HAVE YOU BEEN LOOKING AT OR LISTENING TO TECH MATERIALS YOU
SHOULDN'T? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
28J. ARE YOU WAITING FOR SOMETHING TO HAPPEN? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
29J. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN FALSE READS? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
30J. WERE YOU RUN ON A WRONG C/S? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
31J. DID YOU HAVE A PERSONALITY CLASH WITH AN
AUDITOR? _________
2WC E/S to F/N.
_________
1K. IS SOMEONE OR SOMETHING HOSTILE TO YOU? _________
Check for SP with a PTS interview or get a full PTS R/D
programmed.
2K. ARE YOU PTS ? _________
PTS interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
3K. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE HOSTILE TO DIANETICS OR SCIENTOLOGY?
_________
PTS interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
4K. DO YOU FEEL SUPPRESSED? _________
PTS interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
5K. DO YOU HAVE SOME OTHER SORT OF PTS CONNECTION? _________
PTS interview or get a full PTS R/D programmed.
6K. YOU'RE NOT PTS? _________
2WC to F/N.
1L. SOME SORT OF CAN'T HAVE? _________
Find correct Havingness Process and remedy.
2L. IS YOUR HAVINGNESS LOW? _________
Find correct Havingness Process and remedy.
3L. HAVE YOU BEEN RUN ON THE WRONG HAVINGNESS
PROCESS? _________
Find correct Havingness Process and remedy.
4L. HAVE YOU BEEN RUN ON HAVINGNESS WITHOUT
CONFRONT? _________
Find correct Havingness and Confront Process and remedy.
5L. YOU DIDN'T NEED ANY HAVINGNESS? _________
2WC to F/N.
6L. YOUR HAVINGNESS IS FINE? _________
2WC to F/N.
_________
1M. HAS SOMETHING GONE ON TOO LONG? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N on each
(or date to blow, locate to blow if qualified).
2M. YOU WENT ON BY A RELEASE POINT? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
3M. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
4M. THE AUDITOR KEPT ON GOING? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
5M. HAS THERE BEEN ANY OVERREPAIR? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
6M. ARE YOU PUZZLED ABOUT WHY THE AUDITOR
KEEPS ON? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
7M. ARE THERE STOPS? _________
Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L.
8M. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WE SHOULD COVER? _________
2WC to F/N.
_________
1N. HAVE YOU SEPARATED OUT? _________
2WC E/S to F/N. Then Triple Expanded Grade Two or
L10 on Advance Program.
2N. ARE YOU SOMEBODY ELSE? _________
2WC E/S to F/N. Program for LX Lists.
3N. DO YOU THINK SOMETHING ELSE IS WRONG? _________
2WC to find what. Note BD item. If BD item is covered
by one of the other questions on the list, handle per
instructions. Otherwise, GF M5 and handle.
4N. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY ILL? _________
2WC to find what. Note BD item. 2WC to F/N and get
further C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
5N. DID YOU THINK OF SOMETHING ELSE THAT SHOULD
HAVE BEEN ON THIS ASSESSMENT? _________
2WC to F/N.
1O. HAVE WE BEEN REPAIRING A TA THAT ISN'T HIGH? _________
2WC to F/N.
2O. HAVE WE BEEN REPAIRING A TA THAT ISN'T LOW? _________
2WC to F/N.
3O. IS THE METER FAULTY? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate
to F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first.
4O. IS THERE NOTHING WRONG? _________
Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct, then indicate
to F/N. Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first.
_________
1P. WAS THERE A FALSE EXAM REPORT? _________
Indicate and 2WC to F/N.
2P. HAVE YOU HAD TO WAIT AT THE EXAMINER? _________
Indicate and 2WC to F/N.
3P. HAVE YOU BEEN UPSET BY THE EXAMINER? _________
Indicate and 2WC to F/N.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
Paulette Ausley
By order of
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:PA:nt. If/nt
Copyright � 1972, 1974. 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 JANUARY 1972R
REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Checksheet (Revisions in this type style)
Checksheet (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
and above
Auditors
Ethics Officers
PTS RD ADDITION
(Refers to:
HCOB 9 Dec 71R PTS RUNDOWN,
Rev. 8 Dec 78 AUDITED)
The only reasons a PTS RD does not work are:
C/S error: 1. Not doing one at all.
C/S error: 2. Doing one in the middle of another RD.
C/S error: 3. Doing one without set-up, including a complete PTS C/S-1.
C/S error: 4. The person was not PTS-which is to say was not
chronically ill or roller-coaster and the items or flows didn't read.
Auditor error: 5. The RD was badly run auditor-wise. R3R was bad,
metering poor, ruds not correctly or fully done.
Auditor & C/S error: 6. The RD was quickie, only doing step (a) and
brushing it off.
C/S error: 7. Even though the whole RD was done fully, there remained
on the case an undetected additional person or thing to which the pc was
PTS.
The rules of PTS are
A PERSON WHO ROLLER-COASTERS IS ALWAYS PTS.
A PERSON WHO IS CHRONICALLY ILL ALWAYS IS PTS.
A PTS RUNDOWN THAT DOES NOT WORK HAS NOT BEEN DONE AS PER 1 TO 7 ABOVE.
The remedies to the above are
1. Do it.
2. Pgm it in correct sequence.
3. Set the case up properly so it is running well and past errors
handled.
4. Establish how well the person holds his gains before pgming one. If
any Q at all, do the RD.
5. Cram the auditor on TRs, metering, R3RA drills and ruds. Do L4BRA, .
. . L3RF on the pc and handle accordingly.
6. Complete the rundown.
7. 2WC "What is your attention on?" to F/N. On PTS Rundown fly all ruds
single; L&N "On the PTS Rundown what being or thing was missed?"; R3RA
Triple or Quad on it; fly all ruds and overts on it Triple or Quad; run
"Can't Have/Enforce Have" Triple or Quad. If all not very okay now L&N
"What other subject or people might have been overlooked on the PTS
Rundown?" and handle the item on each step of the rundown per HCOB 9 Dec
71RC, Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN.
A PTS RD always works. If it works with a relapse there is an error in
it as in the numbered paras above.
THIS IS VITAL TECH TO THE PC. IT MAKES THE MOST DIFFICULT CASES FLY IF
IT IS DONE RIGHT.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mes.bh. jk
Copyright � 1972, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JUNE 1972RA
REVISED 15 OCTOBER 1974
RE-REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
and above
Class IV Grad (Cancels BTB 24 March 1973R,
Checksheet "PTS RD ERRORS.")
Ethics Officers
(Revisions in this type style)
PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP
The following is an additional step to the PTS Rundown developed by me
and tested at Flag. This step is run after each terminal is run, to prevent
bypassing charge.
THE STEPS ARE:
1. Select the terminal already run in R3RA and ruds.
2. Clear "can't have," "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE
ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T
WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two.
3. Run on the SP item "can't have/enforced have" as motivator
repetitive, then overt repetitive, the Flow Three terminal to others,
others to terminal and the Flow Zero of the pc to himself because of
the terminal (four flows of two commands each or five if the pc is
Quad). Check the flows for a read before running them. Do not run
unreading flows.
4. After the terminal is handled with the four (or five) flows of "can't
have/enforced have" Objective Havingness should be run. Then the next
PTS Rundown item is taken up and run on all steps, as above.
THE COMMANDS:
F1. Did _____run a can't have on you? Tell me about it.
Did _____force something on you you didn't want?
Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F2. Did you run a can't have on_____?
Tell me about it.
Did you try to force something on_____that he (she, it)
didn't want? Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F3. Did _____run a can't have on others?
Tell me about it.
Did _____force something on others they didn't want?
Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F3A. Did others run a can't have on_____?
Tell me about it.
Did others force something on_____that he (she, it) didn't want?
Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
F0. Did you run a can't have on yourself because of _____?
Tell me about it.
Did you try to force something on yourself that you didn't want
because of_____ ?
Tell me about it. (Alternate/repetitive to EP.)
-OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS--
THEORY
The theory is that SPs are SPs because they deny Hav and enforce
unwanted Hav. They also deny do and enforce unwanted do. They also deny be
and enforce unwanted be. This is why we have never before been able to run
Subjective Hav. It collided with SPs, overts, and withholds on them.
A very full rundown then would be to start with don t be, must be; go
on to don't do must do: end up with can't have, enforced have. (Not to be
run at this time.) Hav alone should handle without resorting to be or do.
END OFF AT ONCE AND BEGIN OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS IF THE TA SOARS OR THE
PC CAVES IN. If this does not handle, then do a C/S 53RL at once and
handle.
PTS RD NOTES
With the issue of HCOB 17 Mar 74, TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS, it
becomes necessary to convert the PTS RD 2WCs for items into L&N questions.
Example: Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you?
L&N to BD F/N item.
Avoid listing the same question twice. The L&N for places and planets
should be restricted to planets only on VA pcs and an L4BRA used at the
first sign of trouble.
Additional PTS RD items can be obtained from past PTS interviews. Done
by L&N the RD is very powerful and direct. The pc must be well set up for
it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt. jh.dr
Copyright � 1972, 1974. 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCOB BULLETIN OF 30 JANUARY 1973RC
REVISED 19 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
All Super
All Word (Revisions in this type style)
Clearers (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Word Clearing Series 46RC
METHOD 9 WORD CLEARING THE RIGHT WAY
(Cancels BTB 30 January 1973RA
Word Clearing Series 46RA
METHOD 9)
(Ref: M9 PICTURE BOOK-which will be
issued in due time as part of a special course.
HCOB 23 March 78RA Revised 14 Nov 79,
Word Clearing Series 59RA, CLEARING WORDS.)
Word Clearing Series 46RB was the first HCOB which gave the full and
correct use and handling of M9. It has been revised here to include
developments on how one goes about clearing a word. This revision is on
page 133, section 7 "CLEAR THE WORD." There are five other changes, all
minor. Earlier write-ups on this subject, not by myself, stated that the
person's Mis-U was that word on which he stumbled. This is not the case. It
is only occasionally the word on which he stumbles that is misunderstood.
Usually, as was covered long since in study tech, it is the earlier word or
symbol which has caused the stumble or twitch or blink or omit or
mispronunciation or what have you.
HISTORICAL
Method 9 Word Clearing was first developed in a pilot project which
sought to teach people to read who were not reading in their native tongue.
The first versions of M9 were not correctly written up but the technology
nevertheless began to spread in use. It was found that not only non-English
students didn't know what they were reading but as the educational
standards of the culture deteriorated, it was found that people reading in
their native tongue could benefit with the use of M9. It was then found
that college students could not get through M9. And the latest survey has
demonstrated that 31 school teachers taken at random throughout the school
systems flunked M9 on their common reading materials. What has apparently
happened here is that we have drifted down in literacy to a point where the
culture can't read or hear. In a technical culture such as this, one should
not ask further why it is failing.
Because there are not enough Supervisors to personally M9 all the
people on the planet, much less a medium size class, it has to be done on a
turnabout basis by the students themselves. This caused a difficulty with
M9 because one was asking students who couldn't read to understand how to
do the Method 9 which would find the things which prevented them from
reading. Here again we have the chicken and egg problem. Therefore, the
procedure has been demonstrated in a picture book which will be issued in
due time as a part of a special course. This picture book shows the student
how to M9 another student and he can, after being drilled by the Supervisor
on the picture book. So this has also been solved.
M9 is probably the top key method of Word Clearing today. You would be
utterly amazed to find somebody who habitually reads Western stories cannot
pass an M9 on them. He sees, "He mounted his roan (a type of horse)" and he
understands from this,
"He roamed around the mountains." He has become so accustomed to not-ising
his inability to understand what he is reading that he thinks it is
ordinary. Isn't that the way everybody reads?
M9 brings it home forcefully to him that he really doesn't understand
what he is reading. This is not why one uses it. One uses it to produce
somebody who can read. But, like one of the English teachers who was M9ed
on his own text, although he may begin with hostile protest that of course
he knows what he is reading, he soon gets into the real reality of it and
sees where he is at. His willingness to continue then has already been
secured.
It will be found that the simple things are the main things on which he
stumbles. Thus M9ing is usually preceded by M8 as covered in the new basic
comprehensive reading course. This shows him by picture book how to use a
dictionary and gets him to define the simple words of the language. Commas,
semicolons, even capital letters will be found to be commonly
misunderstood.
The usefulness of M9 has gone then from a way of spotting the points
where a foreign language student is falling down to detecting and handling
the professors and the rest of the culture. It is an extremely important
method of Word Clearing and should be learned very well.
HOW TO LEARN METHOD 9
Method 9 Word Clearing is a way of finding the words a person doesn't
understand in a book or other written material by having him read it aloud
to the Word Clearer.
It is very simple and precise and it can be done by students on one
another with great success as well as by a professional Word Clearer.
Method 9 does not require expertise and it does not require a meter as many
other methods of Word Clearing do. Method 2 Word Clearing is very similar
to Method 9 but it requires the use of a meter to pick up the
misunderstoods. The virtue of Method 9 is that, while it is very thorough
and effective, it is not restricted in use to those who can operate a meter
and who have other expertise needed for Method 2. It can therefore be
learned very easily and used very broadly. To teach M9 the Supervisor gets
the student through the picture book version of M9, which will be issued in
due time as part of a special course and drills him so that he can do
Method 9 Word Clearing and he can M9 other students. One can also learn how
to do it all by himself by going through this picture book and this HCOB.
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS
A student, when reading by himself, often does not know he has gone
past misunderstood words. But whenever he does go by misunderstood words,
he will have trouble with what he is reading.
A misunderstood word keeps a person from duplicating what the written
materials actually say. It causes the communication formula to go out.
A word can be misunderstood in many different ways and it is important
that these different types of misunderstoods are known to the person doing
Method 9. A word can be misunderstood because of a false (totally wrong)
definition, an incorrect definition, an incomplete definition, an
unsuitable definition, a homonymic (one word which has two or more
distinctly separate meanings) definition, a substitute (synonym-a word
which has a similar but not the same meaning) definition, a no (omitted)
definition, a rejected (by the person himself, usually due to a false
datum) definition or an invented (by the person himself, usually due to a
false datum) definition. This is covered more fully on HCOB 17 Jut 79 Issue
I, THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD DEFINED.
If a person has habitually gone past many, many misunderstood words in his
reading or his education (which most everybody in this present culture
has), not only will his ability to read be lowered but also his
intelligence. What he himself writes and says won't be understood, what he
reads and hears he won't understand, and he will be out of communication.
The probability is that he will have sunk back to the first dynamic, the
world will look like a very peculiar place to him, he will feel that he is
"not understood" (how true!) and life will look a bit miserable to him. He
can even appear to others to be criminal. At best he will become a sort of
robot or zombie. So you see, it is very important to clear misunderstood
words. Lack of the ability to communicate probably underlies the causes for
the current drug culture.
You will be amazed that somebody who appears to be a criminal idiot all
of a sudden begins to look comparatively like a genius after he has been
M9ed.
WHY METHOD 9 WORKS
A student who understands all the words on the page he is reading will
be able to read the page aloud perfectly. He will feel bright and alert and
will fully understand what he reads. But when a student passes a word or
symbol he doesn't understand, the misunderstood causes an interruption of
his voice or physical beingness. His voice may change, or he may stumble on
a word or make a face or squint his eyes or react in some other way.
This is easy to understand if you remember that a person can go blank
after he passes a word or symbol he doesn't understand. He may make a
mistake in his reading right there at the point of the misunderstood, or he
may continue reading past the misunderstood and make a mistake on a later
word or symbol. He will feel duller and he will try to make up for the dull
feeling by reading with more effort. This will always be expressed by a
nonoptimum action of some kind which must be noted and handled at once by
the Word Clearer.
A nonoptimum reaction is anything the student does besides read the
page easily naturally. and perfectly. Examples of some of the nonoptimum
reactions that may show up are:
1. Student adding a word or leaving out a word or changing a word in the
sentence he is reading.
2. Student stumbling on a word or saying it incorrectly.
3. Student pausing or reading more slowly.
4. Student frowning or looking uncertain.
5. Student going stiff or tensing a body part, such as squinting his
eyes or tightening the grip of his hands, or biting his lip or some
other physical reaction.
6. Student reading with effort.
7. Student reading with a glib, robotic attitude (which is how he gets
after he has been forced to read "correctly" by someone who doesn't
know anything about Mis-Us).
Other manifestations can occur.
Note that the above is not a complete list of reactions but is intended
to give an idea of what to look for. In all fairness, one can stumble when
reading if he is trying to read in a dim light or he is having eye trouble
or the print or handwriting or pencilled corrections in the text are very
hard to make out. Thus it is necessary to do M9 Word Clearing only in
bright light and if the fellow is supposed to be wearing glasses, he should
be wearing glasses, and the material being M9ed must not contain smudges
and
deletions itself. All possible reasons why he cannot see the text and
unclear text must be removed. Otherwise, the student will simply say he
couldn't see it or the light was bad or some other wrong Why.
Anytime the person makes an error in his reading or reacts in some
nonoptimum way, a misunderstood will ALWAYS be found just before that point
or sometimes at that point itself.
Example: The student is reading the page aloud. He reads, "Raymond
walked home slowly and thoughtfully," then he frowns. The other student,
who is M9ing him says: "That's it. Is there some word or symbol there that
you didn't understand?" (If the student wonders why he was stopped, the
Word Clearer tells him what reaction he noticed.)
The student looks over what he has read. He feels uncertain about the
word "slowly." He tells this to the Word Clearer and the word "slowly" is
looked up in the dictionary and used in sentences until the student fully
understands it.
When the word that was misunderstood is located and cleared, the
student will brighten up and will begin reading clearly and correctly once
again.
THE GLIB STUDENT
Glibness is often trained into students by the current educational
methods used in schools. The student is drilled to suppress or go by
misunderstood words and to robotically answer back with what the book says.
If he can do this, he is said to be a "good student" and a "good reader."
With this method, a student's understanding of what he has read is
actually considered to be separate from the act of reading. If the
educators bother with comprehension at all, it is only to measure
memorization, not understanding.
In today's schools, students are actually instructed to go right on
past words they don't understand; to figure out how to say them and to
continue reading whether they understand the text or not. One textbook even
advises, "If you find a hard word, read it as best you can and continue to
read." Students are expressly drilled to suppress reactions such as
mispronouncing words, substituting one word for another, inserting extra
words, repeating words, and omitting words. These reactions indicate
misunderstoods have been bypassed, but under heavy drilling a student can
learn to become robotic enough to suppress even these reactions, and read
on, leaving misunderstoods piled up behind him. In all fairness, his
teachers were not just trying to victimize him. The discovery of the
effects of a misunderstood word and the reasons for such stumbles had not
been discovered. Teachers did not know about them. Thus they invented
various drills to force the student not to make these "comprehension
errors." They did not have the tech or even know what caused these
manifestations. You have the reasons for them in Method 9 and in study
tech.
You can spot a glib student on Method 9 because he sounds and looks
robotic when he reads. One step to take on such a glib student is to ask
him if he has ever been taught to suppress reactions on words which, when
he read them, he did not understand. One is asking him to take the
"suppress" off. He will tell you immediately that he has been when this is
true, and some emotional reaction can occur. One simply lets him talk about
it until the charge seems to be off of it and then gets him to start his
M9ing again. Some of it may be left, of course, but he will gradually get
into it and become more honest and more there. He thinks, of course, when
you're M9ing him that you simply want him to utter certain sounds. This is
what he has been trained to expect. If he is supposed to read aloud, he is
supposed to utter certain sounds. These sounds, of course, are meaningless
to him but that doesn't matter. Previously, his whole purpose and training
pattern in reading aloud was narrowed into getting passed. So it may be
necessary for the Supervisor to take up why he is being M9ed. But even
though he is reading like a robot and suppressing everything, you will be
able to see the
suppression deepen when he hits the really big Mis-Us. He reads them even
more robotically than he does the other parts of the text, so these too can
be detected. As soon as he has found a few of these things out and found
out what you are trying to do, he will begin to respond much more readily
with M9. Method 9 on common reading materials will show up a student's lack
of reading comprehension and show up his misunderstoods so that he can
really see it for himself. It may be an entirely new idea to him that
written pages and sound waves communicate something.
Another method, an extreme one, of handling the extensively mistrained
glib student is to get him to read a paragraph and then, employing a method
known as "clay table," get him to demonstrate it. He won't be able to do
so. Furthermore, he will realize he isn't able to do so. It was just
sounds.
METHOD 9 ON COMMON READING MATERIALS
To do Method 9 on common reading materials, the student chooses a
paperback book or something that he reads for his own pleasure and he reads
it aloud to the Word Clearer.
If he cannot read it perfectly, it is because he has gone by
misunderstood words. At first it may not be real to the student that he has
misunderstood words. But after he has found and cleared a number of them
using Method 9, the student will realize that he does have misunderstood
words and that his misunderstoods are getting in the way of his ability to
read.
When the student reaches the point of realizing that he does actually
have misunderstood words on the materials he commonly reads for his own
pleasure, he becomes very willing to find his own misunderstood words and
he can usually do so easily. Method 9 of common reading materials can be
ended at this point. The student is now much more aware of and able to find
and handle his own misunderstoods and he is on his way toward reading
naturally, correctly and with understanding.
HOW TO DO METHOD 9
1. STUDENT AND WORD CLEARER SIT ACROSS FROM EACH OTHER.
The student and the Word Clearer sit across from each other at a table
or desk. Each person has his own copy of the text to be word cleared. The
Word Clearer must be able to see the student and the page in front of him
at the same time.
2. DICTIONARIES ARE AVAILABLE.
A good, simple English language dictionary, and any other dictionaries
the student may need are available. (Above all things, do not use what is
called a "dinky dictionary." This is different than a simple well-expressed
dictionary. A dinky dictionary is what you commonly get off the paperback
racks in drug stores. It quite often defines word A as word B and then
defines word B as word A. It also omits all the alternative definitions and
all the technical definitions. Always have to hand, at least in the
classroom, the most extensive and voluminous set of dictionaries anybody
ever heard of on all the subjects ever heard of under the sun, plus any
encyclopedias that you can round up.)
3. STUDENT RECOGNITION OF MISUNDERSTOODS.
Before the student starts reading, he should be told that if he sees a
word he doesn't know the meaning of, he should stop and look the word up
and clear it instead of going on past it. And the student should be
encouraged to find and clear misunderstood words himself. M9 brings about
the ability to do this, so that the student will find and clear his own
misunderstoods in future. The Word Clearer on M9 would never prevent the
student from clearing a word that the student recognizes as misunderstood.
Correctly done M9 will bring about the ability of the student to find and
clear his own misunderstoods.... (If you don't want to spend ten years
M9ing one page, it is best to get him through Method 8 on simple English
words. This will be part of a special course which will greatly improve
someone's level of literacy.)
4. STUDENT READS THE TEXT ALOUD TO THE WORD CLEARER.
The student reads the text aloud to the Word Clearer. He is not on the
meter. While the student reads, the Word Clearer follows his own copy of
the same text, watches the student and listens to him.
The Word Clearer must be very alert and see or hear any nonoptimum
reactions of the student while he is reading.
5. NONOPTIMUM REACTION EQUALS MISUNDERSTOOD WORD.
A nonoptimum reaction by the student to what he is reading is the clue
to the Word Clearer that the student has encountered a misunderstood word.
The Word Clearer and student must now locate the exact misunderstood word
or symbol. It will be found just before or sometimes at the point the
nonoptimum reaction occurred.
6. FIND THE MISUNDERSTOOD.
If it is not obvious to the student that he has reacted and he just
continues reading, the Word Clearer says, "That's it. Is there some word or
symbol there that you didn't understand?" It is the duty of the Word
Clearer to steer the student to the misunderstood. It is either at the
point of the nonoptimum reaction or before it. The point is that the
student must be steered onto it. And it then is looked up.
The student may be able to spot his misunderstood word right away and
tell the Word Clearer what it is. Or he may have difficulty finding it and
the Word Clearer will have to help him find it.
The Word Clearer helps the student by getting him to look earlier and
earlier in the text from the point where he reacted until the misunderstood
word is found. The Word Clearer can also spot-check the student. Spot-
checking means choosing words from the text the student has already read
and checking with him to see if he knows the definitions of those words.
If the student is uncertain about any word or gives a wrong definition,
then that word is taken up and cleared in the dictionary.
7. CLEAR THE WORD.
Once the misunderstood is found it must be fully cleared in the
dictionary. The person will be hung up on the definition of the word as it
is used in the context of what is being word cleared, which will not
necessarily be the first definition given in the dictionary. To try and
clear any other definition before clearing the one he is stuck in would
cause him to try and clear a word over misunderstood Therefore he would
rapidly go over the definitions to find the one that fits the context and
clear that first. Then the remaining definitions would be cleared.
This is how a word is cleared:
The first step is to look rapidly over the definitions to find the one
which applies to the context in which the word was misunderstood. One reads
the definition and uses it in sentences until one has a clear concept of
that meaning of the word. This could require ten or more sentences.
Then one clears each of the other definitions of that word, using each
in sentences until one has a conceptual understanding of each definition.
The next thing to do is to clear the derivation-which is the explanation of
where the word came from originally. This will help gain a basic
understanding of the word.
Don't clear the technical or specialized definitions (math, biology,
etc.) or obsolete (no longer used) or archaic (ancient and no longer in
general use) definitions unless the word is being used that way in the
context where it was misunderstood.
Most dictionaries give the idioms of a word. An idiom is a phrase or
expression whose meaning cannot be understood from the ordinary meanings of
the words. For example "give in" is an English idiom meaning "yield." Quite
a few words in English have idiomatic uses and these are usually given in a
dictionary after the definitions of the word itself. These idioms have to
be cleared.
One must also clear any other information given about the word, such as
notes on its usage, synonyms, etc. so as to have a full understanding of
the word.
If one encounters a misunderstood word or symbol in the definition of a
word being cleared, one must clear it right away using this same procedure
and then return to the definition one was clearing. (Dictionary symbols and
abbreviations are usually given in the front of the dictionary.)
8. READ THE SENTENCE AGAIN.
The Word Clearer then asks the student to read once again the sentence in
the text in which the misunderstood word or symbol was found. The student
does so and if he reads it correctly with understanding, he continues
reading the text. Any further nonoptimum reactions are handled by finding
the next misunderstood word and clearing it, as above.
9. METHOD 9 IS CONTINUED UNTIL THE TEXT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
Method 9 is continued until the text to be word cleared is completed.
10. STUDENT GOES TO EXAMINER AT THE END OF METHOD 9 WORD CLEARING .
The student is always sent to the PC Examiner at the end of a Method 9
session.
And that's all there is to doing Method 9!
METHOD 9 CAUTION
When the Word Clearer has misunderstoods of his own on the material
being word cleared, he tends to go "wooden" and just sits and does nothing
to handle the student. The Word Clearer must always clear his own
misunderstood words or else when the student stumbles on a word, the Word
Clearer won't even see it or hear it because of his own misunderstoods. He
can miss the student's stumble and never get the student's misunderstood
word.
The Word Clearer can also miss a student's reactions when he has so
much attention on the page that he becomes unaware of the student or
doesn't even look at the student.
When students are M9ing each other on the same study materials, they do
NOT first just read the materials as this will only give them
misunderstoods. They take the materials being word cleared one paragraph or
section at a time and M9 each other on it. This is done by a student first
M9ing his twin on one section, and then getting M9ed on what he just word
cleared his twin on, plus the next section. It then turns around again. The
twin gets M9ed on what he just word cleared the other student on, and on
the next section. In this way one person is not constantly leading. Unless
the M9ing reversals are done in this fashion, misunderstoods could be
missed. The whole text would be covered in this way.
EXAMPLES OF STUDENT REACTIONS
AND THEIR CORRECT HANDLING
There are many, many different kinds of reactions that can occur when a
student passes a word he doesn't understand. There are also many different
ways a student will respond to Method 9. All that is needed for success
with Method 9 is for the Word Clearer to understand Method 9 and to apply
it exactly according to this bulletin.
Given here are some examples of student reactions and correct handlings
by the Word Clearer:
A. THE STUDENT CHANGES A WORD IN THE SENTENCE.
Example:
The page says: "The boy then reached down and patted his dog."
The student says: "The boy than reached down and patted his dog."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Is there some word or symbol there
that you didn't understand?"
The student looks at the words "then," "boy" and "the." He knows those
words. So he looks in the sentence before that one. In that sentence he
sees the word "collie." He's not sure what that is.
He tells the Word Clearer and they clear the word "collie."
B. THE STUDENT ADDS AN EXTRA WORD.
Example:
The page says: "the child went to school."
The student says: "The child went to the school."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Is there some word or symbol there
that you didn't understand?"
The student looks over the sentence. He says he understands all the
words, but thinks the sentence should say. "A child went to school" rather
than, "The child went to school."
The Word Clearer says, "Okay. let's spot-check some words. What does
'the' mean in this sentence?"
The student looks blank for a moment and doesn't say anything. The Word
Clearer says, "All right. We're going to look up the definition of 'the'."
"The" is then looked up and cleared.
C. THE STUDENT LEAVES OUT A WORD.
Example:
The page says: "Robert then visited the city."
The student says: "Robert visited the city."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Is there some word or symbol there
that you didn't understand?"
The student reads over the sentence. He can't find anything he doesn't
understand. The Word Clearer asks him to look over the next earlier
sentence for a misunderstood word. The student can't find any there,
either. The Word Clearer has the student keep looking earlier and earlier
in the text and finally the student spots the misunderstood word in the
first sentence of the page.
The word found is then cleared.
D. THE STUDENT LEAVES OFF A PART OF A WORD, SUCH AS AN "S" OR AN "ED" AT
THE END.
Example:
The page says: "There was a huge pile of assorted tools in the
woodshed."
The student says: "There was a huge pile of assorted tool in the
woodshed."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. You left the 's' off 'tools.' Have a
look over that sentence or page and tell me what word or symbol was
misunderstood."
The student says, "I don't have any misunderstood words on this page."
The Word Clearer acknowledges him and asks him once again to have a
look for the misunderstood word or symbol.
The student looks over the entire page but still says he has no
misunderstoods. So the Word Clearer starts spot-checking the student on the
definitions of the words on the page.
The Word Clearer asks, "What's the definition of 'tools'?" The student
says, "It means 'implements of work'." The Word Clearer says. "That's fine.
What's the definition of 'assorted'?" The student gives it to him
correctly, so the Word Clearer simply backs up the sentence words one by
one, getting the definition of each one until he hits the word "was."
Student says, "It's something you saw with." The Word Clearer says,
"Let's have a look at 'was' in the dictionary." Each definition of "was" is
then cleared and it is suddenly discovered that the person has never
understood that it had anything to do with the conjugation of the verb "to
be."
E. THE STUDENT STUMBLES ON A WORD OR SAYS IT INCORRECTLY.
Example:
The page says: "I think I'll go shopping."
The student says: "I th-think...."
The student stops after he stumbles. The Word Clearer says, "Is there
some word or symbol there that you don't understand?"
The student says, "Well, it just doesn't make sense."
The Word Clearer asks, "What doesn't make sense?"
The student says, "I don't see why it says 'think' here."
The Word Clearer says, "All right. Let's have a look at 'think' in the
dictionary."
"Think" is then looked up in the dictionary, but the student can't seem
to get it, even though he understands all the words in the definition.
The Word Clearer asks, "Tell me, what part of speech is 'think' in that
sentence?"
The student says, "Uh, I don't know."
The Word Clearer says, "Okay. Well, right here in the dictionary, it
says 'verb'. What does that mean to you?"
Student: "Mm . . ." (long pause).
The Word Clearer says, "All right." He gets a grammar book and says,
"Have a look at this definition of 'verb'."
"Verb" is then cleared but while clearing it, the student says, "Hey, I
always thought you could only have one verb in one sentence and that
sentence has two verbs in it. Somebody threw me a curve." And as he has
cognited and has now got it straight, M9ing continues. He uses it in
sentences until he's really got it, then they go on to the next definition
of "think" in the dictionary.
F. THE STUDENT HESITATES OR PAUSES WHILE HE IS READING OR BEGINS READING
MORE SLOWLY.
Example:
The page says: "The sun was shining on the flowers."
The student says: "The sun--was shining on the flowers."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. What word or symbol was
misunderstood just before that point?"
The student very carefully looks back over the page, but he can't find
any words he doesn't understand.
The Word Clearer says, "Okay. I'll spot-check you." He gives the
student a thorough spot-check, but no misunderstood words are found.
The Word Clearer then asks, "Show me where you were last doing really
well on this text."
The student shows him. It's three paragraphs back.
The Word Clearer says, "Good. We're going to check from this point back
for any misunderstood words."
He extensively spot-checks the student in that area, and the student's
misunderstood word is finally found and cleared.
G. THE STUDENT FROWNS, LOOKS UNCERTAIN, GOES STIFF, OR IN SOME WAY SHOWS
LACK OF COMPREHENSION.
Example:
The page says: "The family ate dinner together every night."
The student says: "The family ate dinner together every night."
While the student is reading, there is a slight look of uncertainty on
his face.
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Look over this section you've just
read and tell me what word or symbol has been misunderstood."
The student says, "But why did you stop me?"
The Word Clearer says, "You were looking uncertain as you read that last
sentence."
The student says, "Well actually, I did have some attention back on the
sentence before last."
The Word Clearer says, "Okay. Was there any misunderstood word or
symbol there? "
The student says, "I have some attention on the word 'for', but I've
looked that up before."
The Word Clearer says, "Well, let's have another look at it."
"For" is then cleared and the student realizes that he hadn't fully
cleared all of the definitions when he had previously looked it up.
H. THE STUDENT TENSES HIS BODY IN SOME WAY. THIS COULD BE TIGHTENING HIS
GRIP, SQUINTING, TENSING HIS JAW, JERKING HIS BODY, STIFFENING ANY BODY
PART, ETC.
1-The page says: "The girls were delighted to see one another."
The student says: "The girls (tightens the muscles in his jaw) were
delighted to see one another."
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Look back over this section you have
just read. Was there a misunderstood word or symbol there?"
The student looks at the page a long time. The Word Clearer can see he
is looking earlier and earlier on the page. Finally the student says, "I
can't see any words I don't understand, but this line seems a bit strange
to me: 'It was Christmas Eve. Alice was listening to "Silent Night" when
Carol came into the room.'"
The Word Clearer says, "All right. Let's do a spot-check in that area.
What does 'Carol' mean?"
The student says, "That's a girl's name."
The Word Clearer says, "Good. What do the quotation marks show in that
sentence? "
The student says, "Hm. Well, someone said 'Silent Night' to Alice."
The Word Clearer says, "All right. I want you to read this section in
the grammar book on quotation marks."
The student reads the section aloud and says, "Oh, I see. 'Silent
Night' is a song and you use quotation marks around the names of songs.
I've got it now!"
The Word Clearer says, "Great," and has the student give some examples
of the use of quotation marks. They then return to the text.
2-The page says: "The men walked quietly through the dockyard."
The student says: "The men walked quietly through the dockyard."
(Student leans forward and looks at the page more intently.)
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Is there some word or symbol there
that you didn't understand?"
The student looks over the sentence. "Well, I've never seen 'dockyard'
used like that before. It doesn't make sense."
The Word Clearer acknowledges him and has him look it up. The student
reads the definition and starts brightening up. He turns to the Word
Clearer and says, "And all this time I thought a dockyard was a place where
you built docks, I never could understand why...."
3-The page says: "The car drove off, leaving a trail of dust in the
air."
The student says: "The car drove off, leaving a trail (student squints
his eyes at the page) of dust in the air."
The Word Clearer says, "Is there some misunderstood word or symbol in
that area?"
Student looks bewildered. "No, the sentence just doesn't make sense."
Word Clearer says, "All right. What is the definition of 'trail'?"
"Oh, that's the impression of a horse hoof where a horse has been."
The Word Clearer says, "Okay, look up the word 'trail'." The word is
cleared and the student sees that he had a totally wrong definition.
I. THE STUDENT YAWNS, SUPPRESSES A YAWN, GETS WATERY EYES, ETC.
The page says: "A bright red apple was on the table."
The student says: "A bright red apple was (yawn) . . ."
The Word Clearer says, "Okay. Let's find the word or symbol that was
misunderstood in this section."
The student says, "I'm not sure I have the right definition for
'bright'. Could we look it up?"
The Word Clearer says, "Sure," and they look up the word "bright."
J. THE STUDENT BEGINS READING WITH MORE EFFORT. THIS INCLUDES READING
VERY CAREFULLY OR UNNATURALLY OR ROBOTICALLY OR READING IN SUCH A WAY
AS TO SHOW THAT THE WORDS HAVE NO MEANING TO HIM, OR THAT HE DOESN'T
UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS READING.
The page says: "The families were having a picnic on the beach."
The student says: "The families were having a picnic on the beach." X
The student reads the page correctly, but he is being very careful not
to make any mistakes.
The Word Clearer says, "That's it. Let's find the misunderstood word or
symbol that you didn't understand before this sentence."
The student says, "Yes, I started feeling uncomfortable while I was
reading the sentence before last."
The Word Clearer says, "Good. Let's look just before that for the
misunderstood word."
The student finds his misunderstood and it is cleared.
The important point for the Word Clearer to remember is that WHERE
THERE IS A STUDENT REACTION, A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD WILL BE FOUND, USUALLY
JUST BEFORE THE POINT HE REACTED.
The misunderstood word can always, always be located with good
communication, persistence and a totally standard application of Method 9
tech, as given in this HCOB. If the student can't easily achieve this, he
must go to the Supervisor for help.
TRs AND M9
To be a very successful M9 Word Clearer, one's TRs must be in. One has
to be able to TR 3 the question and get the actual misunderstood, yet at
the same time, one should never go robotic or rote on the Method 9
procedure. For example it may happen that halfway through a sentence, the
student stops, smiles, and then continues on. Upon questioning, you find
that a bulletin he has read many, many times before is now finally making
sense. You wouldn't then ask him for his misunderstood. Just acknowledge
his win and carry on with your Word Clearing with your TRs in and your
application of this bulletin 100% standard. The wins and gains of those you
word clear will by no means be slight.
QUARRELS OR UPSETS
It occasionally happens that the students doing the Word Clearing get
into a quarrel or upset. If this happens, you know that one of two things
has happened, either:
1. "Misunderstoods" that were really understood were forced off on the
student, or
2. Actual misunderstoods were not detected and were passed by.
1. If this happens, you can clean up any falsely looked-up words
by asking him if he was made to look up words he understood. If this is the
case, the student will brighten up and tell you the word or words he was
wrongly made to clear. This done, the M9ing can be resumed.
2. If the above doesn't handle it, then one knows that
misunderstoods have been missed. Have the twin who is doing the Word
Clearing take him back to when he was last doing well and then come forward
in the text, M9ing as he goes, picking up the missed misunderstoods. It
will usually be found that several misunderstoods have been missed, not
just one.
WORKSHEETS
Worksheets are a written record of the Word Clearing session. They
contain the student's name, the Word Clearer's name, the date and the name
or title of what is being word cleared. The Word Clearer keeps worksheets
during the Word Clearing session and writes down which words have been
looked up and cleared and any other important information concerning the
Word Clearing.
Worksheets are stapled to the student's Exam Form when Word Clearing is
complete. They are filed in his pc folder.
TEACHING THE STUDENT
TO DO METHOD 9
This is done using this HCOB or the M9 Picture Book (which will be
issued in due time as part of a special course). This is a simple picture
book which is handed to the student. He goes through the book and then does
some M9 drilling as contained in
the back of it. The Supervisor checks him out and corrects him if needed,
using only the data in the M9 Picture Book and this HCOB. No verbal tech
or opinions are thrown in.
The end result of a well done Method 9 is a student who is certain he
has no misunderstoods on that material so that he can easily study the
material and apply it.
Method 9 is a great civilization saver.
It is easy to do. It's fun and it gives tremendous gains.
It is vital that Method 9 is done correctly, exactly by the book.
Otherwise, people will be denied the enormous wins that can be attained
with it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr.nc
Copyright � 1973. 1974. 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 7 APRIL 1973RA
TRs Course REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Checksheet
Qual/Tech (This bulletin has been revised
C/Ses to incorporate new discoveries
Supervisors on the subject of coaching TRs.)
TR Course
Students (Revisions in this type style)
Cramming Off (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
GRADIENTS IN TRS
References:
HCOB 16 Aug 71R II TRs MODERNIZED
TAPE: 30 Jun 61 TRAINING ON TRs-
(6106C30) LECTURE ON AUDITING
HCOB 3 Feb 79 I CHANGE THE CIVILI
ZATION EVAL
Time after time you're going to find somebody in an organization trying
to teach the TRs this way: Go on to TR 0 and stick there.
Eight months later he'll still be doing the TR 0.
You're going to find that consistently, because the element of ENDURE
enters into it. That is improper. TRs are done to improve a person's
handling of the cycle of communication. When he sticks somewhere on a TR
instead of cycling through them, each one to a win, minor or major, over
and over again, you don't accomplish the purpose of TRs.
Here is the way you do the TRs. You'll find it very valuable.
You do OT TR 0 to a win or a cognition or an improved ability to simply
BE THERE. You go on to TR 0. The student hasn't gotten a full pass on OT TR
0. He just got accustomed to it and had a win.
You do TR 0 to a win for the student that HE recognizes as a win.
You do TR 0 Bullbait to a win for the student that he recognizes as a
win.
You do TR 1 to a win for the student that he recognizes as a win. You
don't try to cure or even necessarily mention faults. When you do flunk the
student you handle every flunk with an HCOB, but you concentrate on the
student acquiring skills rather than eradicating faults. You can't
eradicate a fault from something a person knows little about in the first
place.
You do TR 2 to a win for the student that he recognizes as a win.
You do TR 3 to a win for the student that he recognizes as a win.
You do TR 4 to a win for the student that he recognizes as a win.
Now you come back to OT TR 0. Get the student better at OT TR 0. Then
go through all the TRs again. It's kind of like running CCHs-they get a
little bit of a win at it and you go on to the next one.
Each time the student cycles through the TRs he is coached in the
direction of increasing the skills he has-never in the direction of a lose
or a flunk. It is very
simple. You ensure that the student 1) KNOWS the TRs HCOBs, 2) DUPLICATES
the drill, 3) DOES the drill, and then you always, always COACH HIM TO A
WIN.
There is no reason or use in making the student wrong, he usually is
about as wrong as you can get. Unreasonable as it may seem to some, the job
of the coach and Supervisor is to make the student right.
If you do that, you shorten considerably the time it takes to learn the
TRs.
In other words, you approach this with a gradient scale.
We did learn about gradient scales many years ago and we should
continue to apply that knowledge.
Eventually, when you use this approach to TRs the student will
eventually be able to do a faultless 2-hour OT TR 0, a faultless 2-hour TR
0, a perfect TR 1, an incredibly good TR 2, an error-free TR 3 and an easy,
satisfying, flawless TR 4 without Q and A or ARC breaking the pc, which
just makes the session flow. And once his TRs are "in" they will stay in
for life and he will be able to handle a communication cycle so smoothly
and so effortlessly that nobody including himself even recognizes that he
is doing it.
This is the way to fast, successful TRs Courses, full passes and TR
graduates with natural, easy, flubless TRs.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt. jk
Copyright � 1973,1974,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 OCTOBER 1973RB
RE-REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
C/S Series 87RB
NULLING AND F/Ning PREPARED LISTS
(Ref: HCOB 4 December 1978, HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N)
A prepared list is one which is issued in an HCOB and is used to
correct cases. There are many of these. Notable amongst them is C/S 53 and
its corrections.
It is customary for the auditor to be required to F/N such a list. This
means on calling it that the whole list item by item is to F/N.
To F/N a list, you do it Method 3. Somebody's got the wrong idea that
it is done Method 5-going over and over and over something.
A recent C/S of mine on the subject stated: "The reason you're having
trouble F/Ning a list is because you don't do M3, handle each read to the
end and then reassess M3 and handle each read to the end. It is obvious
from your list markings that you were doing M5 over and over, which of
course gets into protest. Usually M3 at some point will begin to F/N and
that is the reason you do M3. Also, when you miss on a prepared list the
F/N stops. So there were a few minor misses on these lists but mostly
because you were doing it M5. Also, it takes an R-Factor that you're going
to clean up everything on the list."
You handle a list Method 3 by calling the line and handling the line. A
prepared list should be used to get optimum results on a pc. If a prepared
list reveals that more needs to be handled, i.e. engram in restimulation,
then it would be handled. (Note: In this case the handling would be to
assess the L3RF and handle the reads. WARNING: You would NOT run Dianetics
on a Clear, Dianetic Clear or OT. For C/ears and OTs you would assess the
L3RF and then simply INDICATE the read.)
If a more major action was found to be needed it would be programmed
for handling, per list instructions. If something hot leaps into view on a
prepared list then handle it.
It is the wrong think that one has to quickie a prepared list and get
it to F/N in a hurry rather than to use it to get optimum results on a pc.
All the list must be called a final time.
"NONREADING, NON-F/Ning" LISTS
Now and then you get the extreme oddity of a list selected to exactly
remedy the case not reading but not F/Ning.
Of course this might happen if the list did not apply to the case (such
as an OT prepared list being used on a Grade IV, heaven forbid). In the
case of lists to correct listing and in particular the C/S 53 Series, it is
nearly impossible for this situation to occur.
A C/S will very often see that the auditor has assessed the list on the pc,
has gotten no reads, and the list did not F/N.
A "reasonable" C/S (heaven forbid) lets this go by.
Yet he has before him first class evidence that the auditor
1. Has out-TRs in general,
2. Has no impingement whatever with TR 1,
3. Is placing his meter in the wrong position in the auditing
session so that he cannot see it, the pc and his worksheet,
4. That the auditor's eyesight is bad.
One or more of these conditions certainly exist.
To do nothing about it is to ask for catastrophe after catastrophe with
pcs and to have one's confidence in one's own C/Sing deteriorate badly.
An amazing number of auditors cannot make a prepared list read for one
of the above reasons.
Putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood Words on the list
will either get a read or the list will F/N. If a list does not F/N then
the subject of the list is still charged or there is something wrong with
the list.
The moral of this is that prepared lists that do not read F/N. When
prepared lists that do not read do not F/N or when the auditor cannot get a
prepared list to F/N, serious auditing errors are present which will defeat
a C/S.
In the interest of obtaining results and being merciful on pcs, the
wise C/S never lets this situation go by without finding what it is all
about.
READING THROUGH AN F/N
There is a skill that any auditor who is handling lists should master
and that is reading through an F/N.
WHEN TAKING A LIST TO F/Ning ASSESSMENT AN AUDITOR MUST KNOW HOW TO
READ THROUGH AN F/N.
When going down a list that is F/Ning you'll sometimes see the F/N
"check" briefly and then continue. The swinging weight of the F/Ning needle
has momentum and it will tend to obscure a read. But a sharp auditor will
see this "check" or slow in an F/N, know he has a hot item and take it up
and handle it. An auditor who can't read through an F/N will miss it and go
right on by, and the F/N then kills within the next couple of items. Now
he's got a suppressed read and he's going to have trouble F/Ning the list.
When this happens, even if you can't read through an F/N, you should go
back up the list an item or two and find it. BUT one should be able to read
through an F/N. It is the secret of being able to take a list accurately to
an honestly F/Ning assessment, with no wasted time or effort. (Ref: HCOB 4
December 78, HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N.)
THE "RABBIT BUTTONS"
To "rabbit" means to run away from the bank. (The term derives from the
fact that a rabbit is timid and runs away from just about everything.)
Some auditors have been known to "rabbit" from auditing sessions or
from certain session actions. This is wholly due to out-TRs or shaky
metering and the auditor not knowing how to use his tools. Rabbiting shows
up in various ways-not getting the pc through the engram and not taking a
Dianetic chain to full EP, or calling an F/N when it's an ARC break needle,
or simply ending off when the going gets rough, etc. It's running away from
the action rather than completing it.
One of the ways some auditors rabbit from F/Ning a list is by using
what have come to be known as the "rabbit buttons." Given a C/S 53 (or
other list) to take to F/Ning assessment, the auditor begins assessing and
handling the list items but on the slightest provocation (such as a minor
protest from the pc), introduces such questions as: "Is the C/S 53 being
overrun?", "Is this list unnecessary?", "Do you feel over-repaired ?" or
something similar.
These questions are valid enough when they occur, as they do, at the
end of some prepared lists. But used out of sequence they serve to get the
auditor out of taking the C/S 53 or other assigned list to F/Ning
assessment. Auditor throws in the "rabbit buttons," pc immediately agrees
it's "overrun" or "unnecessary," and the auditor ends off, with the
majority of the list items unchecked for charge.
This is by no means true of all auditors but it has happened frequently
enough for these questions, used out of sequence, to be dubbed the "rabbit
buttons."
And each time an auditor has rabbited in this way from F/Ning a list,
something has been found later that should have been handled.
Thus: WHEN THE C/S CALLS FOR F/Ning A LIST IT MUST BE TAKEN TO
COMPLETION AND NOT QUIT BEFORE THE ENTIRE LIST IS F/Ning, ITEM BY ITEM, ON
ASSESSMENT.
Any pc protest or upset or apprehension over extensive repair actions
or a list having to be F/Ned stems mainly from auditor out-TRs and
mismetering (missing reads and calling false reads) when doing repair
lists.
Any auditor back-off or protest on F/Ning a list stems from these same
points plus having to handle pc upset or protest.
The solution is for the auditor to polish his TRs and sharpen up his
metering. AND learn to read through an F/N.
Given good TRs and standard metering, the auditor who can then also
read through an F/N will have no difficulty taking a list to F/Ning
assessment.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision 22.3.77
assisted by
LRH Tech Expeditor
Re-revised 4.12.78 by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1973, 1977, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RD
REVISED 30 OCTOBER 1978
Cl IV Grad Chksht
Cl VI Chksht (Revisions in this type style)
C/Ses
Cl IV Grad & above C/S Series 53RL SF
Auditors (Short Form)
SHORT HI-LO TA ASSESSMENT C/S
The C/S Series 53 Short Form is the basic prepared list used by
auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range or to correct case
outnesses. A pc who is relatively new to auditing should be assessed on the
C/S Series 53 Long Form, which puts the items into full questions.
Assess this list Method 5 and handle reads in the order they occur on
the list.
HCOB 30 Oct 78, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF contains data vital to the proper
use of the C/S Series 53 lists.
PC NAME DATE________________
A. Interiorized into something _____ Tired _____
Go in _____ Deadness _____
Went in _____ Unconsciousness _____
Put in _____ Can't get it _____
Want to go in _____ Protest _____
Can't get in _____ Don't like it _____
Can't go in D. Drugs _____
Want to get out _____ LSD _____
Kicked out of spaces _____ Alcohol _____
Being trapped _____ Pot _____
Forced in _____ Medicine
Pulled in _____ E. Engram in restimulation _____
B. List errors _____ Same engram run twice _____
Overlisting _____ Can't see engrams too well _____
Wrong items _____ Invisible _____
Upset with giving items to _____ Black _____
auditor _____ Loss _____
Wrong date _____ Lost _____
Wrong location _____ F. Same thing run twice _____
Wrong Why _____ Same action done by another
Wrong indication _____ auditor _____
Wrong PTS item _____ G. Doing something with mind
C. ARC break _____ between sessions _____
Problem _____ Some other practice _____
Withholding something _____ H. Word Clearing errors _____
Some sort of withhold _____ Misunderstood words _____
Not saying _____ Misunderstoods in session _____
False withhold _____ Study errors _____
Withholds gotten off more I. False TA _____
than once _____ Wrong sized cans _____
Overts _____ Tired hands _____
Audited over out-ruds _____ Dry hands _____
Sad _____ Wet hands _____
Rushed _____ Loosens can grip _____
Upset _____ Wrong hand cream _____
J. Auditor overwhelming _____ L. PTS _____
Couldn't hear auditor _____ Suppressed _____
Couldn't understand what was M. Something went on too long
_____
being said _____ Went on by a release point _____
Couldn't understand what was Went on past Dianetic Clear
_____
being done _____ Overrun _____
Feel attacked _____ Auditor kept on going _____
Something wrong with F/Ns _____ Over-repair _____
Overrun F/Ns _____ Puzzled why auditor keeps on _____
Missed F/N _____ Stops _____
Items really didn't read _____ N. Something else _____
False reads _____ Physically ill _____
Bad auditing _____ O. Repairing a TA that isn't high _____
Incomplete actions _____ Repairing a TA that isn't low
_____
Invalidation _____ Faulty meter _____
Evaluation _____ Nothing wrong
Couldn't get auditing _____ P. False Exam Report _____
Interruptions _____ Waited at Exam _____
K. Can't have _____ Upset by Examiner _____
Low havingness _____
A. If A or any of the A Group reads on ANY pc (including Dianetic Clear,
Clear or OT) who has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List Revised
(HCOB 29 Oct 71RA) and handle the reads. If Int correction has already been
done on the pc get an FES on the Int RD AND its corrections. When all
errors are corrected, the C/S may order the End of Endless Int Repair RD
per Int RD Series 4.
If the pc is C/ear, Dianetic C/ear or OT and has not had an Int RD,
do the End of Endless Int Repair RD. Do not run any Dianetics.
Otherwise, if the pc has never had an Int RD, give him a standard Int
RD per Int RD Series 2.
WHEN DOING AN INT HANDLING RUN ONLY THE INT BUTTONS GIVEN ON THE INT
RD SERIES HCOBs. Note on the assessment which button(s) have just read on
the C/S 53. Other items in the A Group are designed to detect out-Int, but
don't embrace the earlier beginning, so do NOT run these.
B. If any of these read, do an L4BRA on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these, do an L4BRA in general. You
can go over an L4BRA several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4BRA gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong Indication
or Wrong PTS item per C/S Series 78.
C. Any reading item must be F/Ned. Use standard handlings on rudiments
questions. On "Out-Ruds" find which rud and handle. "Feel Sad" = ARC break
of long duration so handle the ARC break. If "Deadness" or
"Unconsciousness" read 2WC to F/N (E/S if necessary) and then program for
the Personal Revival Rundown.
D. 2WC to F/N. Do a Drug RD Repair List if the pc has had his Drug RD.
(HCOB 19 Sep 78 II) L3RF if needed. Advance Program to handle all reading
drugs as soon as possible per NED Series 9R. (The above handling does not
apply to Clears and OTs. On these, indicate the read. See HCOB 30 Oct 78,
C/S SERIES 53, USE OF for further data on the handling of Dianetic
questions which are reading on Clears and OTs.)
E. If any of these read, do an L3RF and handle per the instructions. (On
Clears and OTs simply indicate the read. Don't run any engrams or seek
further to repair. See HCOB 30 Oct 78, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF.)
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If yogi or mystic exercises or some such 2WC E/S
it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if
TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If study errors, 2WC E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to
the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans or other error. Use HCOBs 12 Nov 71RA, 15 Feb
72R, 18 Feb 72R, 21 Jan 77RA, HCOB 23 Nov 73RB, all on false TA. Then clean
up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries (b) F/N
worries. (2) Then 2WC times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3)
Rehab any overruns due to false TA obscuring F/Ns.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through an
F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be obscured and
mistaken for a read if sensitivity too high. These items are all 2WC E/S to
F/N. Auditors who made them need cramming badly or retread. Rehab F/Ns that
have been missed.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness Process and remedy.
L. 2WC to F/N. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or Date/Locate. On
"Went on past Dianetic Clear" 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S. A qualified C/S
who has fully checked out on the materials must adjudicate whether this
state has been attained before the preclear may attest to Dianetic Clear.
N. 2WC to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2WC to F/N and get further
C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per 1 above.
P. Indicate and 2WC to F/N.
Per HCOB 30 October 1978, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF, the order in which
reads are to be taken up is built into the C/S 53 itself. You simply start
at the top of the list and take up and handle to F/N each read as you come
to it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1973, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1973RE
REVISED 30 OCTOBER 1978
Cl IV Grad
Chksht
Cl VI Chksht (Revisions in this type style)
C/Ses
Cl IV Grad and
above Auditors
C/S SERIES 53RL
(Long Form)
The C/S Series 53 Long Form is used to get a TA up or down into normal
range or to correct case outnesses. It is exactly the same as the C/S
Series 53 Short Form except that it puts the items into full questions so a
pc relatively new to auditing can understand what is being asked.
Assess this list Method 5 and handle reads in the order they occur on
the list.
HCOB 30 Oat 78, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF contains data vital to the proper
use of the C/S Series 53.
PC NAME DATE________________
A. Interiorized into Are you withholding _____
something? _____ anything?
Go in? _____ Is there some sort of
Went in? _____ withhold? _____
Put in? _____ Is there something
Want to go in? _____ you're not saying? _____
Can't get in? _____ Has someone said you had
Can't go in? _____ a withhold when you
Want to get out? _____ didn't? _____
Kicked out of spaces? _____ Did you have to get the
Being trapped a _____ same withhold off more
Forced in? _____ than once? _____
Pulled in? _____ Have you committed any
B. Have there been list overts? _____
errors? _____ Have you been audited
Have you had an over- over out-rudiments? _____
listed list? _____ Do you feel sad? _____
Have you been given Do you feel rushed? _____
any wrong items? _____ Are you upset? _____
Have you felt upset Are you tired? _____
with giving items to Deadness? _____
the auditor? _____ Unconsciousness? _____
Have you been given a Do you feel like you
wrong date? _____ can't get it? _____
Have you found a wrong Are you protesting
location? _____ anything? _____
Have you been given a Is there something you
wrong Why? _____ don't like? _____
Have you been given a D. Have you taken drugs? _____
wrong indication? _____ Have you taken LSD? _____
Have you been given a Have you drunk alcohol? _____
wrong PTS item? _____ Have you smoked pot? _____
C. Do you have an ARC Have you taken medicine? _____
break? _____ E. Is there an engram in
Do you have a problem? _____ restimulation? _____
Has the same engram been Did you feel like items
run twice? _____ didn't really read? _____
Can't you see engrams Have there been false
too well? _____ reads? _____
When you look for Have you had bad
incidents is it auditing? _____
invisible? _____ Are there any incomplete
When you look for inc- actions? _____
dents is it all black? _____ Has there been any
Have you experienced a invalidation? _____
loss? _____ Has there been any
Have you lost something? _____ evaluation? _____
F. Has the same thing been Couldn't you get
run twice? _____ auditing? _____
Has the same action Have actions been
been done by another interrupted? _____
auditor? _____ K. Is there something you
G. Are you doing something can't have? _____
with your mind between Is your havingness low?
sessions? _____ L. Are you PTS? _____
Are you involved in Do you feel suppressed? _____
some other practice? _____ M. Has something gone on
H. Have there been Word too long? _____
Clearing errors? _____ Have you been audited
Is there a misunder- past a release point? _____
stood word? _____ Have you gone past
Have there been mis- Dianetic Clear? _____
understoods in session? _____ Has something been
Have there been any overrun? _____
study errors? _____ Has the auditor kept on
I. Do you have a false TA? _____ going? _____
Have you used the wrong Have you been over
sized cans? _____ repaired? _____
Do your hands get tired? _____ Are you puzzled why the
Are your hands dry? _____ auditor keeps on going?
_____
Are your hands wet? _____ Are there stops? _____
Do you loosen the can N. Is there something else
grip? _____ wrong? _____
Are you using the wrong Are you physically ill?
_____
cream? _____ O. Are we repairing a TA
J. Is the auditor over- that isn't high? _____
whelming? _____ Are we repairing a TA
Couldn't you hear the that isn't low? _____
auditor? _____ Has the meter been
Couldn't you understand faulty? _____
what was being said? _____ Is there nothing wrong?
_____
Couldn't you understand P. Have there been false
what was being done? _____ Exam Reports? _____
Do you feel attacked? _____ Did you have to wait at
Has there been some- exams? _____
thing wrong with F/Ns? _____ Have you been upset by
Have F/Ns been overrun? _____ the Examiner? _____
Have F/Ns been missed? _____
A. If A or any of the A Group reads on ANY pc (including Dianetic
Clears, Clears, OTs) who has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List
Revised (HCOB 29 Oct BRA) and handle the reads. If Int correction has
already been done on the pc get an FES on the Int RD AND its corrections.
When all errors are corrected, the C/S may order the End of Endless Int
Repair RD per Int RD Series 4.
If the pc is Clear, Dianetic C/ear or OT and has not had an Int RD, do
the End of Endless Int Repair RD. Do not run any Dianetics.
Otherwise, if the pc has never had an Int RD, give him a standard Int RD
per Int RD Series 2.
WHEN DOING AN INT HANDLING RUN ONLY THE INT BUTTONS GIVEN ON THE INT RD
SERIES HCOBs. Note on the assessment which button(s) have just read on the
C/S 53. Other items in the A Group are designed to detect out-Int, but
don't embrace the earlier beginning, so do NOT run these.
B. If any of these read, do an L4BRA on the earliest lists you can find
that have not been corrected. Lacking these, do an L4BRA in general. You
can go over an L4BRA several times handling each read to F/N until the
whole L4BRA gives nothing but F/Ns. Handle a Wrong Why or Wrong Indication
or Wrong PTS item per C/S Series 78.
C. Any reading item must be F/Ned. Use standard handlings on rudiments
questions. On "Out-Ruds" find which rud and handle. "Feel Sad" = ARC break
of Long Duration so handle the ARC break. If "Deadness" or
"Unconsciousness" read 2WC to F/N (E/S if necessary) and then program for
the Personal Revival Rundown.
D. 2WC to F/N. Do a Drug RD Repair List if the pc has had his Drug RD.
(HCOB 19 Sep 78 II) L3RF if needed. Advance Program to handle all reading
drugs as soon as possible per NED Series 9R. (The above handling does not
apply to Clears and OTs. On these, indicate the read. See HCOB 30 Oct 78,
C/S SERIES 53, USE OF for further data on the handling of Dianetic
questions which are reading on Clears & OTs.)
E. If any of these read, do a L3RF and handle per the instructions. (On
Clears and OTs simply indicate the read. Don't run any engrams or seek
further to repair. See HCOB 30 Oct 78, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF.)
F. Clean up any protest and inval and rehab to F/N.
G. Find out what it is. If yogi or mystic exercises or some such 2WC E/S
it to first time done, find out what upset had occurred before that and if
TA now down do L1C on that period of pc's life.
H. If Word Clearing, do a Word Clearing Correction List, handle all
reads. If study errors, 2WC E/S to F/N, and add a Study Correction List to
the pc's program.
I. False TA is wrong cans or other error. Use HCOB 12 Nov 71RA, 15 Feb
72R, 18 Feb 72R, 21 Jan 77RA, HCOB 23 Nov 73RB, all on false TA. Then clean
up the bypassed charge with (1) Assess for best read (a) TA worries (b) F/N
worries. (2) Then 2WC times he was worried about (item) E/S to F/N. (3)
Rehab any overruns due to false TA obscuring F/Ns.
J. These are auditor errors. Low TA is generally caused by overwhelming
TRs and incomplete actions. A high TA can be caused by an auditor
overrunning F/Ns or failing to call them. Or trying to assess through an
F/N and mistaking an F/N right swing for a read. An F/N can be obscured and
mistaken for a read if sensitivity too high. These items are all 2WC E/S to
F/N. Auditors who made them need cramming badly or retread. Rehab F/Ns that
have been missed.
K. Can't have or Hav. Find correct Havingness Process and remedy.
L. 2WC to F/N. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling.
M. Find out what. Clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or Date/Locate. On
"Have you gone past Dianetic C/ear?" 2WC to F/N. Return to C/S. A qualified
C/S who has fully checked out on the materials must adjudicate whether this
state has been attained before the preclear may attest to Dianetic C/ear.
N. 2WC to find what. Note BD item. If BD item covered by one of these
categories handle per instructions. If not just 2WC to F/N and get further
C/S instructions for handling if necessary.
O. Get pc to tell you about it briefly. If correct then indicate to F/N.
Go E/S and indicate it if no F/N on first. If false TA handle per 1 above.
P. Indicate and 2WC to F/N.
Per HCOB 30 October 1978, C/S SERIES 53, USE OF, the order in which
reads are to be taken up is built into the C/S 53 itself. You simply start
at the top of the list and take up and handle to F/N each read as you come
to it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: dr
Copyright � 1973, 1975, 1977,1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1974R
REVISED 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
Qual (Revisions in this type style)
All Auditors (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
E-METERS
SENSITIVITY ERRORS
(Ref: HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP
SESSIONS AND AN E-METER
HCOB 14 Jan 77 URGENT AND IMPORTANT
TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP
HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA CAN
SQUEEZE)
An auditor must set the sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly right for
each pc and each session.
The setting is different for almost every pc and can change, session to
session, even for one pc.
TOO LOW
Too low a sensitivity on some pcs (like Sens 1) will obscure reads and
make them look like ticks. It will obscure an F/N. Whereas a Sens 16-128
will show reads and F/Ns.
A pc can he hindered by the auditor not setting the sensitivity high
enough to show reads and F/Ns. Items are missed as well as F/Ns.
On almost any pc, a convulsive or incorrect can squeeze can shoot the
needle across the dial and cause the auditor to reduce his sensitivity down
and down and down until he finally sets it at a point where long falls
become ticks and F/Ns don't exist. E-Meter Drill 5RA tells one how to do a
proper can squeeze.
TOO HIGH
When auditing a flying pc or a Clear or OT the auditor who sets the
sensitivity too high gets weird impressions of the case.
"Latent reads" on such a case are common. They aren't latent at all.
What happens is that the F/N is more than a dial wide at high sensitivity
and a started F/N looks like a read as its sweep is stopped by the pin on
the right of the dial.
Also, the pc can delicately press the cans improperly with his thumbs
and forefingers when doing a can squeeze and cause the auditor to push the
sensitivity up and up and up. And then with the sensitivity set too high,
be unable to keep the needle on the dial and so miss or imagine reads. E-
Meter Drill 5RA now teaches how to do this properly.
In this way uncharged items are taken up, the case is slowed, overrun
and general upsets requiring repairs occur.
On a one-hand electrode an OT VII sometimes has a 1/3 dial wide F/N at
Sens 2!
This would mean a 3/4 dial wide F/N . . . with two cans.
A Clear sometimes has a floating TA at Sens 5 or 10 instead of an F/N.
He might have to be run at Sens 1 on two cans to keep him on a dial or
detect F/Ns.
This is a very important matter as the auditor will miss F/Ns, think
beginning F/Ns are reads and as the pre-OT is off the dial, miss reads.
Thus uncharged areas are run and charged ones are missed.
The result is very chaotic to repair.
Many lower level pcs also have a need for lower sensitivity settings.
SUMMARY
Sometimes an easy pc looks very difficult just because of wrong
sensitivity settings brought about by wrong can squeeze procedure.
Set the sensitivity for the pc for 1/3 of a dial drop on a correct can
squeeze per E-Meter Drill 5RA (Reference: HCOB 7 Feb 79R, E-METER DRILL 5RA
CAN SQUEEZE). And do the drills. You will be amazed.
Don't get repairs.
Get wins.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:ntm.dr
Copyright � 1974 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 MARCH 1975R
REVISED 23 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo (Revisions in this type sty/e)
Also: (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
FLAG ORDER
Ship Captains (This bulletin has been revised
MO's Hat to include updated data on
Qual Hats NEW oral penicillin.)
C/Ses
ANTIBIOTICS,
ADMINISTERING OF
(This cancels FO 2313 "Antibiotics,
Further Data" and revises FO 2186.)
(Note: This data is given for information alone and is not intended to
prescribe or otherwise treat an individual. All prescriptions and
treatments should be done in due accordance with the medical laws of
any country in which a person seeks treatment.)
There are several "antibiotics." These are moulds or chemical compounds
which cause bacteria, germs, to be unable to reproduce themselves (hits
their 2D) while not destroying the cells of the body. At least that is one
of the leading theories of why they work. "Antibiotic" means anti =
against, biotic = living beings (such as bacteria). So it's against bugs.
Disease is said to be caused by germs or virus. Germs are microscopic
cells which breed and have a bad effect on body cells and fluids. Virus is
a germ that is too small to be seen in a microscope. Thus there are germ
infections and virus infections.
Usually one type of germ equals one disease, i.e. typhoid fever.
However, an illness can be a compound of several types of germs but this is
not usual.
Virus diseases respond very badly to most antibiotics. In fact, in the
presence of penicillin, a virus sort of suspends action without any real
temperature change while the penicillin is present and gets busy again when
the penicillin is gone.
The effect of most antibiotics on virus is zero. Some claims are made
that antibiotics work against virus. Measles is a virus illness.
So antibiotics are mainly effective against germs. Venereal disease,
pneumonia, wound infections and a long parade of diseases can be cured by
antibiotics.
When illness is accompanied by temperature, antibiotics is usually the
first thought.
Antibiotics can however be GROSSLY MISADMINISTERED and in fact usually
are even in hospitals.
The trick is to get the temperature subnormal with antibiotics within
the blood leveling period. Blood leveling means when the antibiotic has
gotten into the blood and is actually holding the infection (stopping the
bacteria's "2D" from continuing). More of the same antibiotic is given
approx. 2 hours prior to blood leveling time. This then brings the
temperature right on down to subnormal; continue the antibiotic so that it
keeps the temperature subnormal until it just can't keep it subnormal any
more and it comes up to normal. It will be found that the patient is now
well and not likely to relapse. If blood leveling time is reached (the time
is always stated on the instructions and contraindications write-up) and
the temperature continues to rise, you have not used the correct antibiotic
and must at this point change to another kind of antibiotic.
Each antibiotic has its own blood leveling time: penicillin is 24 hours,
gephaloridine is 8 hours, streptomycin is 6 hours, etc.
Before administering antibiotics you must ensure that you know exactly
what toxicity it is (toxic or poisonous quality the antibiotic has to the
patient). For example streptomycin can cause pregnant mothers to give birth
to children who have impaired hearing. Renal (kidneys; having to do with
them) damage can be caused by certain antibiotics if the person has too
much of a certain kind of antibiotic. Therefore, prior to administering any
kind of antibiotic ensure that you know the patient's full medical history,
as well as knowing exactly what the toxicity of the antibiotic is so that
you do not damage the patient.
If not enough antibiotic is given or if it is the wrong kind for that
disease the temperature will not be heavily affected or at best sinks to
normal without going subnormal. This condition can go on and on and on and
the patient relapses.
Also if antibiotics are given too briefly the temperature goes to
subnormal, the antibiotic ceases to be given, the patient feels better,
then probably relapses-gets ill all over again.
The above important three error situations are:
NOT ENOUGH
WRONG KIND
STOPPED TOO SOON.
To these can be added:
GIVEN TOO IRREGULARLY.
This last is almost always present when you give the patient the
bottle. This is a common medical error. The patients aren't doctors, seldom
take the medicine correctly and often not at all. Antibiotics should be
handed out and seen taken.
Where there is a large number ill, the times can be standardized for
the group. For instance all get it at 3:00 to 3:30, 9:00 to 9:30, etc. Or
even 3 hourly can be done this way.
One takes the temperature before giving the pill. (A glass of water or
a cigarette before temperature taking gives a false report.) Also in this
way one can increase or decrease the dose depending on what the temperature
was.
In very sick cases one has to watch the temperature more closely. In
this way every time the temperature starts to rise from the subnormal where
you are holding it, you immediately dose the patient.
An antibiotic all by itself cannot depress temperature. It's the
reaction of the disease and body that's doing that.
TEMPERATURE
98.6�F or 37�C is normal. A thermometer can be a bit off (.1 or .2 high
or low) and temperature can vary a bit for "normal" one person to the next.
Rising temperature (above normal) is a reaction to a disease. Lowered
temperature (below normal) is a reaction to a disease being handled by the
body or the antibiotic plus the body.
100�F or 37.8�C is well above normal and is a sick temperature. 104�F
or 40.5�C is dangerously (possible death) high.
97�F or 36.2�C is very satisfactorily subnormal.
Temperature rise is probably a body mechanism to burn up a disease,
possibly not. But a slight temperature, a few tenths high, can make a
person feel really bad. Then when it gets up higher they feel drifty and
with it very high go delirious.
A subnormal temperature doesn't much affect how one feels.
"Chills" come with high temperature.
ADMINISTERING DOSES
The general rule when administering antibiotics is:
1. One gives antibiotics until the temperature comes down past normal to
subnormal and comes up to normal again with antibiotics.
After blood leveling time of the first antibiotic the temperature
should break (go normal or below), the person going into a sweat. If it
doesn't, then it's either not enough antibiotic or the wrong kind.
2. After dosage if the temperature just came down a bit from where it
was, that type of antibiotic probably will handle the illness but enough
has not been given. Increase the amount being given.
If after blood leveling time from the first antibiotic the temperature
did not go lower or even rose, it's the wrong antibiotic. You change off to
another and start all over again.
TAKING EFFECT
The blood leveling period of an antibiotic is always stated on the
write-up of the antibiotic (in the box, accompanying the antibiotic). The
second administration is usually given 2 hours prior to the blood leveling
period. Thus if the blood leveling period is 8 hours the second dose is
given 6 hours after the first dose. Take the temperature before the dose
and within the next 2 hours take the temperature again and you will know
whether the antibiotic is working as the temperature should now be leveling
and/or falling.
If the temperature has not leveled or dropped at this period change the
antibiotic. When giving antibiotics FO 2187 "Medical Charts" must be
followed. If you don't have a medical chart you don't know and can't see
how the antibiotic is working.
PAST MALADMINISTRATION
If a person in the past has been treated wrongly with antibiotics, i.e.
got taken off as soon as temperature reached normal and was not continued
as by rule I or 2, the germ remains dormant and the area may reinfect at a
later date.
If more antibiotics are then administered the temperature will go
subnormal and then to normal with the antibiotic. In other words, the cycle
will complete. At this point the germ has been killed.
SESSIONS
Before any session, a heavy dose of vitamins should be given, if the
person is on antibiotics.
KEY PROCEDURE
When the temperature goes subnormal keep it subnormal until it just won't
stay down with the person still taking the antibiotic. The patient will
then be well.
The faster you can get the temperature subnormal the better.
SIDE EFFECTS
Antibiotics have side effects, often very bad.
A patient can be allergic to a certain antibiotic meaning he goes red,
gets hives, has bad reactions in varying degrees of severity. If so get him
on another antibiotic now.
You can test for allergy by scratching the skin and putting a dab of
antibiotic on it (not the sugar or protective covering) on a Band-Aid.
After a while if the person is allergic to it the area will get red and
puffy. This is not usually done unless you are being super cautious.
The chloro and aureo families can affect the sense of balance and early
preparations destroyed the sense of balance forever.
All oral antibiotics sooner or later give the patient a stomach ache
and indiges-.ion. So they should be taken with milk or after a meal, never
with just water.
The longer you keep them on an antibiotic the harder it is on the
patient's system.
The operating rule is give enough of the right kind to get a fast cure.
If you started on the wrong kind get them on the right kind the moment
you detect the error.
DISEASE CYCLES
Diseases have their own cycles of action and time periods if not given
antibiotics. Some run for days, some for weeks, some for a lifetime.
Gonorrhea for instance lasts a year in man, five years in a woman. Syphilis
has its own cure, not an antibiotic, which is "Ehrlich's Magic Bullet,"
neoarsphenamine and Preparation 606, which is a oneshot cure if done right
and only kills I out of 10,000. Syphilis untreated is a lifetime cycle and
drives one crazy, the condition being known as "paresis." Perhaps modern
antibiotics will include it as curative.
Pneumonia runs about 6 weeks on its own if the patient lives.
These disease cycles do not hold true when antibiotics are used. They
take as long to cure as it takes to slam the temperature to subnormal and
hold it there until it can't be held any longer. 24 to 36 hours is the new
cycle for lighter illnesses treated with properly dosed correct
antibiotics.
More serious diseases require longer but mostly because the areas they
infect have poorer blood circulation (such as bone infections).
SULFA DRUGS
The oldest antibiotics are the sulfa drugs. These are white tablets
usually. Enterovioform for stomach illness is a sulfa drug.
They have a very heavy side effect of dizziness and sometimes delusion
(spiders on the wall).
Sulfathiazole is usually now used as a powder to pour in open wounds and it
and its brother sulfas are the only ones that can be used "topically" which
means as a surface treatment (as different from internal).
They follow when taken internally all the rules of antibiotic
administration.
"Gerontal," a trade name for a water-soluble sulfa, is excellent in
kidney infections if the rules of antibiotics are followed. It needs large
quantities.
You can fall back on sulfa when all else fails.
Sulfas are chemical compounds.
PENICILLIN
Penicillin is the first of the antibiotics made from mould (as in
mouldy bread, etc.).
It is the USUAL antibiotic.
It is growing less effective due to diseases getting used to it and
medical misadministration of it.
A disease treated with an antibiotic which is not cured, when
communicated to another body becomes able in the new body to resist
treatment. Thus new antibiotics are continually searched for.
However, penicillin is the basic, usual, antibiotic to use.
A new penicillin (VK) can be taken orally or injected. It would always
need to be prescribed by a physician, and the actual dosage would need to
be prescribed by a physician, but it could then be taken under the care of
an M.O. (Medical Officer).
The oral penicillin VK does work when administered orally (by mouth).
Penicillin VK is a potassium salt of penicillin that is stable in stomach
acids. It does not have to be shot with a needle.
The type of penicillin that does NOT work when taken by mouth is
penicillin G. Stomach acids kill it.
Penicillin G has to be SHOT with a needle. Procaine penicillin in 1cc
or 2cc amounts, shot into the buttocks with the person lying down on his
stomach (muscles relaxed), lasts for 24 hours when a 2nd shot is given.
Other types of penicillin can also work this way. Ordinary penicillin
however (penicillin G) has to be shot every 3 hours! Read the literature
carefully.
If a shot of 24 or 36 hour penicillin hasn't worked in 8 hours to
reduce the temperature at least somewhat use some other antibiotic at once.
Penicillin is no good, even when shot, for stomach or bowel complaints
like dysentery. It is excellent for other types of bacterial infection. It
is usually no good for virus infections.
Oral versus injections of penicillin depends upon the type of and
seriousness of the infection. The injectable penicillin cuts the blood
leveling time to about half as compared to the oral penicillin. So the
injectable penicillin is faster.
If a person is allergic to penicillin some other antibiotic MUST be
used.
OTHER ANTIBIOTICS
Chloro _____aureo_____ strepto_____ compounds are offered under a
variety of trade names. The blank fills "mycin" or "mycetin." Kemacetin or
some such spelling is a company trade name for chloro_____. Chlorofin is
almost the same thing.
Read the literature for the strength of each tablet or shot and what it
is good for. You can puzzle this out even in a foreign language.
Follow the literature.
If one doesn't work, another will. Chloro or aureo handles dysentery,
stomach and bowel upsets, some viruses and a lot of other things.
VITAMINS
B1 should be given when giving antibiotics or the patient gets
depressed as all the B1 gets eaten up by antibiotics, just as alcohol or
sleeping pills eat up B1. 100 mg of Bl a day is an absolute minimum for a
person taking antibiotics.
B2 is vital to give anyone with stomach and bowel complaints whether he
is on antibiotics or not.
Vitamin C is excellent for helping colds and infections. 250 mg is the
usual dose a couple times a day. It's much like fruit in that fruit
contains a lot of it. If anyone's teeth or gums get sore push in lots of
Vitamin C.
So B1 and C are usual along with antibiotics. B1, C and B2 are vital to
help clear up stomach and bowel complaints along with antibiotics.
INTESTINAL BACTERIA
Natural intestinal bacteria are vital to digest and handle food. These
all get killed off by oral antibiotics and must be replaced.
Yoghurt is the usual remedy and one should eat it for several days, a
portion a day after getting well with antibiotics.
The clever French put these exact bacteria in glass vials for daily
dosage. This does the same thing even better than yoghurt. It is called
"Biolactyl."
NOTE: Under medical supervision, LRH has been handling antibiotics as a
ship captain for a long time and has done as well independent biological
research. Some of the data (the use of subnormal temperatures) is not known
to the medical profession but was discovered by Ron in 1952 when he had to
discover it to save an important person's life after two relapses from
doctors using older methods. It has since been proven out by many quick
successes using antibiotics on ships.
A person treating someone on antibiotics must go over this HCOB very
carefully as it is very condensed, very precise and means exactly what it
says. When this data is not known some get into long illnesses which are
needless.
A person treating another with antibiotics has to know many other
things but the above is very vital.
All Div 5 personnel and anyone who will administer antibiotics must
starrate, M9, M4 in Qual on this HCOB. Medical charts (see FO 2187 "MEDICAL
CHARTS") must be made up so that, in case of any fever, the person will be
treated standardly to a speedy recovery.
Compiled from the
notes of LRH by
Kima Jason
Snr MO Flag
for
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revised by
LRH Tech Comps
As assisted by
Gene Denk, M.D.
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:GD:LRHTC:LRH:KJ:nt.rd.dr
Copyright � 1975, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead. Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JUNE 1977-1
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JUNE I 972 RA- 1
ADDITION OF 12 JUNE 1979
Remimeo
PAID COMPS SIMPLIFIED-ADDITION 1
C/S SERIES 81RA
AUDITOR'S RIGHTS MODIFIED-ADDITION 1
HCO PL 1 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVES introduces a new 5-
hour intensive. This is for the purpose of getting a Dianetic Clear check
and rehabilitation only.
For the successful completion of this intensive you may count 3 Paid
Completion points with a bonus of a further 3 points when the person then
re-signs for the next or another service as verified by HCO.
The DTS may count a 5-hour Dianetic Clear Special Intensive as a 1/2 on
the intensive part of his statistic (see HCOB 16 Sun 72RA, C/S Series 81
RA).
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
CS-5 I/T
LRH:AG:gal
Copyright A) 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 FEBRUARY 1978RA
REVISED 16 MARCH 1978
Remimeo RE-REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1979
(Cancels: HCOB 6 Feb 78R-1 Addition of
16 Mar 78, "LSD and the Sweat Program-
Addition"; HCOB 30 Apr 78, "The Sweat
Program Further Data." Re-revises and
re-titles the original bulletin of this
date, "LSD and the Sweat Program.")
(Revisions not printed in a different type style)
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
Refs: HCOB 5 Nov 74 DRUGS, MORE ABOUT
HCOB 31 May 77 LSD
HCOB 25 Oct 71 DRUG DRYING OUT
HCOB 2 Jun 71 Study Series 2
Issue I CONFRONTING
(This issue has been revised to incorporate data from recent research
into the progress of cases in view of the current environmental and
drug scene, and to give the full steps of the new Purification
Rundown.)
(The Purification Rundown does not supplant technology developed and in
use especially in Narconon for persons currently on drugs and apt to
experience withdrawal symptoms when taken off of them. The rundown
would be begun only after such technology was applied.)
(While it is being published now as a holding action until the
Purification Rundown is issued as an individual package, this issue
does contain the rundown as it has been piloted.)
(We are not concerned with handling bodies with the Purification
Rundown. Our concern is freeing the individual up spiritually. The only
dosages recommended are those classified as food. There are no medical
recommendations or claims for it. The only claim is future spiritual
improvement.)
(This data is released as a record of researches and results noted. It
cannot be construed as a recommendation of medical treatment or
medication and it is undertaken or delivered by anyone on his own
responsibility. I receive no percentage of fees for administering this
rundown and my development of it is a contribution and gift to my
friends. )
Glossary: Any words you find in this HCOB which you do not understand
can be found in a normal dictionary or in the Dianetics and Scientology
Technical Dictionary or are explained in the following text.
The planet has hit a barrier that prevents widespread clearing-drugs
and biochemical substances. These can put beings in a condition that can
prevent case gain.
That's the situation today.
What would you give for a rundown that undercut every case on the
planet and could be administered by technicians who did not require long
periods of training?
Sweeping breakthroughs have been made recently through my 29 year study
of the progress of cases against the environmental factors and biochemical
aspect of our current society.
One immediate result of this is the Purification Rundown.
The Purification Rundown is simply a program to clean out and purify
one's system. Based on the original Sweat Out Program, it is a new much
more thorough and much faster version of that program, streamlined by the
introduction of the sauna bath for sweating, and with a much broader use.
It should be clearly understood at the outset that the Purification
Rundown is not a substitute for any kind of processing.
Rather, because of the biochemical problem that besets society today,
it is the undercut that has become necessary to prepare the majority of pcs
for making optimum case gain from their processing.
In point of fact, the Purification Rundown is for anyone.
BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS
By "biochemical" is meant:
The interaction of life forms and chemical substances.
BIO means life; of living things. From the Greek "BIOS," life or way of
life.
CHEMICAL: of or having to do with chemicals.
"Chemicals" are substances, simple or complex, which are the building
blocks of matter.
We live in a chemical oriented society.
One would be hard put to find someone in the present-day civilization
who is not affected by this fact. The vast majority of the public is
subjected every day to the intake of food preservatives and other chemical
poisons including atmospheric poisons, pesticides and the like. Added to
this are the pain pills, tranquilizers and other medical drugs used and
prescribed by doctors. And we have as well the widespread use of marijuana,
LSD, Angel Dust and other street drugs which contribute heavily to the
scene.
I have even found that there is such a thing as the "drug personality."
Drugs can apparently change the attitude of a person from his original
personality to one secretly harboring hostilities and hatreds he does not
permit to show on the surface. While this possibly is not always the case,
it does establish a linkage between drugs and increasing difficulties with
crime, production, program execution and the modern breakdown of the social
and industrial culture.
These factors are all part of the biochemical problem.
WHY "PURIFICATION"?
We have known since 1968 that it is a mistake to try to do mental and
spiritual handling on somebody who has been on drugs. People who have been
on drugs do not make case gain until the drugs are handled. In the early
'70s the Drug Rundown was developed and put into broad use and it included
the auditing out of drugs, medicines and alcohol.
In 1977 I issued HCOB 1 May 77 in which I stated that LSD apparently
stays in the system, lodging in the tissues and mainly the fatty tissues of
the body and is liable to go into action again, giving the person
unpredictable "trips."
The "restimulation" experienced by people who had been on LSD appeared
to act as if they had just taken more LSD.
As it has been stated that it only takes 1/millionth of an ounce of LSD to
produce a drugged condition and because it is basically wheat rust which
simply cuts off circulation, my original thinking on this over the years
was that LSD sticks around in the body. That basically is the idea
underlying the original Sweat Program. The remedy given was to sweat it
out.
From the most recent research developments, it now appears that:
Not only LSD but other chemical poisons and toxins, preservatives,
pesticides, etc., as well as medical drugs and the long list of heavy
street drugs (Angel Dust, heroin, marijuana, etc.) can lodge in the tissues
and remain in the body for years.
Even medicinal drugs such as diet pills, codeine. novocaine, and others
have gone into "restim" years after they were taken and had supposedly been
eliminated from the body.
Thus it seems that any or all of these hostile biochemical substances
can get caught up in the tissues and their accumulation probably
disarranges the biochemistry and fluid balance of the body. These
substances must be eliminated if the person is to get the most possible
gains from mental and spiritual processing.
The operating rule is that mental actions and even biophysical
processes (Objectives, etc.) do not work in the presence of drugs.
Drug residues can stop any mental help. They also stop a person's life!
THE ONLY REASON WE ARE HANDLING DRUGS AND DRUG DEPOSITS IN THE BODY IS
SO THAT THE INDIVIDUAL CAN THEN GET CASE GAIN.
APPARENT GAIN OCCURS BY CLEANING UP THE BODY AND CAN BE SEEN AS AN END
ALL IN ITSELF. THIS IS NOT THE CASE.
DRUGS AND BIOCHEMICAL SUBSTANCES CAN PREVENT CASE GAIN FROM OCCURRING.
Only when we have accomplished the biochemical handling can we then go
onto the next step, the biophysical handling (the relationship of the being
to the body, the environment or universe) and then onto mental and
spiritual processing.
When you try to move these around and put them out of sequence you get
losses.
EXAMPLES: Actual tests have demonstrated that a person who has been on
heavy drugs requires up to ten times the time to obtain a result which a
non-drug person attained in only 6 to 8 hours of processing. Early tests
are also showing that the learning rate of a person who has been on drugs
is much lower than a non-drug person. The memory of a person who has been
on drugs is such as to remove him from fear of consequences. Rate of case
gain is enormously retarded by toxic substances such as drugs.
The reason we can make a breakthrough with this is because of the
"Theta-MEST theory" covered in the text Science of Survival. Older
scientific thought believed all life came from matter, a belief which goes
back to the ancient Egyptian priests and remains today the dominant belief
of chemists, psychologists and psychiatrists.
A life form is a combination of life itself and the physical universe.
Certain elements in the physical universe are highly antipathetic to life
and when introduced into life forms, inhibit proper functioning and even
destroy.
The being (thetan) of course has potential pictures of these toxic
substances and states and as long as they are in the body, these actual
substances can restimulate a
being. When they are gone from the body, the constant restimulation can
cease. So it is actually a spiritual action that is being done.
A Case Supervisor should be aware of the fact that he is wasting his
time if he ignores the above.
The removal of these life-hostile chemical substances from the body of
any person apparently speeds, and in some cases even makes possible, case
gain. It is even worth doing for its own sake.
The Purification Rundown, therefore, is for anyone.
There is probably not a pc today who is outside this requirement.
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
The rundown is a tightly supervised regimen which includes:
Exercise
Sauna sweat out
Nutrition, including vitamins, minerals, etc., as well as oil
intake
A properly ordered personal schedule.
An OCA and IQ Test are given the person before starting the rundown and
upon its completion.
With each of these points kept in and the introduction of the sauna
bath for sweating out, it is a refined and streamlined version of the
original Sweat Out and can be completed in a fraction of the time Sweat
Outs have taken in the past. Properly scheduled, with exercise and sauna
sweat out done 5 hours a day the program can be completed by many in two
weeks time. Some pcs may require more than that, some less.
When The Purification Rundown Is Done: The Purification Rundown could
be considered mandatory to any person who has been on LSD or heavy drugs or
who has a heavy medical drug history. Such a pc is not likely to get very
fast case gain without it.
There are many pcs who have had hundreds of hours of auditing,
including Drug Rundowns, who have never done a sweat out of any kind. While
tremendous gains have been made by such pcs which are not to be
invalidated, there is no doubt but what a large majority of them would
benefit by the Purification Rundown and benefit even further from future
auditing as a result.
Additionally, there are those who have done Sweat Out Programs in the
past who have not experienced all the gain from it possible, or who have
skimped or are incomplete on Sweat Outs.
In all cases such as those above, it is a matter for C/S adjudication
as to whether or not the person would now do the program.
One would not interrupt a case that was running smoothly and making
excellent gains progressively. One would not interrupt an on-going auditing
action to throw in such a program randomly.
On the other hand, where a pc is consistently not making the expected
gains from his processing, or is not continuing up the Bridge on his
grades, a C/S might suspect the need for this program and it now becomes a
part of the tech of C/Sing to take this into consideration.
In the case of a pc who has started and is continuing up the grades, it
would require the correct programming.
As the Purification Rundown is always done under C/S supervision, it
becomes a matter for the C/S to decide.
The Purification Rundown and Auditing: Originally, Sweat Outs were used
to debar people from processing, so they were then permitted to be done
during processing, which was not the most optimum solution.
Today, as the Purification Rundown via sauna can take as little as two
weeks, it is not done concurrently with auditing. The program is done by
itself, intensively, to completion under the daily supervision of the C/S.
WARNING
This program can be strenuous and should not be undertaken by anyone
who has a weak heart or who is anemic. It is therefore absolutely essential
that the following rules are strictly adhered to:
1. Any person, before being put on the Purification Rundown, must first
have written okay from the Medical Officer or a medical doctor. The C/S
and the MO must ensure this prerequisite is kept in.
2. The MO must ensure that no one who has a weak heart or who is anemic
is allowed onto the program. These points must be checked before the
person starts the program. Where the Medical Officer is trained in
testing blood pressure and anemia, the tests can be done by him or her.
Where there is no trained Medical Officer to do these tests, they must
be done by a reliable medical doctor. People with known heart
conditions or high blood pressure or who are anemic, and even those
with certain kidney conditions must do a program which is of a much
lower gradient. An exercise program and nutrition must be worked out
for them with a medical doctor.
3. The Medical Officer tests are continued periodically as the person
goes through the program and if any signs of a weak heart or anemia
should appear, the person is taken off the rundown and handled
medically.
EXERCISE AND SAUNA
In order to flush the poisons and chemical substances out of the body,
the following actions are done.
1. OUTSIDE RUNNING. The first action is outside running. The purpose of
this is NOT to generate sweat but to get the blood circulating and the
system functioning so that impurities held in the system can be released
and are pumped out.
Running increases the circulation throughout the whole body, thus: (a)
it carries out cell waste more rapidly and (b) causes the circulation to go
deeper into the muscles and tissues so those areas which have been stagnant
can now get rid of the accumulation of biochemical deposits and, in the
case of LSD, the "residual crystals" which have been stored.
Running is done on a daily basis once the person has been assigned to
this program. It is done in a rubberized or vinyl-type sweat suit.
The running should be done on a gradient. If you are so breathless that
you can't talk to another while you are running, then you are straining too
much, so cut the gradient.
2. SWEATING IN THE SAUNA. The second action, following the running, is
sweating. A person goes into the sauna to sweat. The impurities can now be
dispelled from the body and leave the system through the pores.
A sweat suit is NEVER worn in the sauna as this acts as insulation much the
same as when a diver wears a wet suit to insulate against the cold of the
sea. Wearing a sweat suit in the sauna would insulate against the heat and
so inhibit and curtail sweating.
Thus far, the use of a dry sauna has proved to be the most successful
in inducing profuse sweating on most people. It is possible that some
people may sweat more in a wet sauna; it may be that it is an individual
matter and it has not yet been fully tested. There is no regulation on the
rundown that outlaws the use of a wet sauna. Whichever type of sauna is
employed, the whole idea is to use the system which permits the person to
sweat the most.
Sweating in the sauna is done at temperatures ranging anywhere from 140
degrees to 180 degrees. It is a matter of what temperature the person can
take. Usually, but not always, a person beginning the rundown will start at
a lower temperature and work up. Then as he progresses he will find he can
take increasing degrees of heat.
On the Purification Rundown, five hours a day are spent on a
combination of running and sweating. There are no arbitraries set as to
exact time limits for each, but the bulk of the period would probably be
best spent in the sauna after the person had gotten his circulation up with
running. One would not stint on the running, however, as the most benefit
is obtained from the sweating when the circulation has been worked up so
that the impurities are ready to be flushed out.
Running and sauna sweat out should be done with another person, as
restimulation of past drugs, medicines, even anesthetics, etc., can and
often does occur, as the toxins get sweated out. This can include the
restimulation of a full-blown "trip" from LSD or other drugs one may have
taken. It is a safeguard, therefore, to be accompanied by a partner or
twin.
Salt and Potassium: Salt (sodium chloride) is not mandatory for every
individual on the program. It is only necessary as a treatment if the
symptoms of salt depletion (heat exhaustion) occur. These are clammy skin,
tiredness, weakness, headache, sometimes cramps, nausea, dizziness,
sometimes vomiting or fainting.
As potassium is lost in sweating, some of the above symptoms can be
from potassium depletion. So, if salt does not handle the above symptoms,
then one would switch to either potassium gluconate tablets or "salt
substitute" which is mainly potassium.
Salt and potassium must be available to anyone who is on the
Purification Rundown. Ideally, they would be located very near the sauna,
clearly labeled.
Liquids: While on this program, it is important that one drink plenty
of water which greatly assists in flushing and cleansing the system out.
Additionally, with all the sweating done in the sauna it would be dangerous
not to replenish body fluids.
PERSONAL SCHEDULE
It is important that a person on the Purification Rundown maintains a
properly ordered personal schedule.
This means that once one has started on the program he must stick to it
sensibly and not skip days or do it in a random fashion. It also means that
one should get enough sleep.
If one proceeds through the program in an orderly fashion it will be
faster and more effective.
NUTRITION
When we speak of nutrition we are not talking about food, as such. We
are talking about vitamins and minerals as well, as these are vital to
proper nutrition and
vital to the effectiveness of this rundown. We are not, however, talking
about "diet" in the overused sense of the word.
Diet and Food Fads
There are NO diets required on this rundown.
The person simply eats what he normally eats and he should make sure he
gets some vegetables and that the vegetables aren't cooked to death.
Vegetables contain a lot of minerals and fiber as well as some vitamins
necessary to his recovery.
We are not food faddists. However, there is plenty of food faddism
going on in society and you can easily start such a fad, so this must be
watched on the Purification Rundown. If we don't watch it on all this we'll
have people eating banana fronds split into diamonds and star shapes and
blessed by some deity or other. Or a fad of "three lettuce leaves criss-
crossed with two slabs of peanut butter an absolute must 18 times a day" as
the only food a person can have.
Food is subject to becoming very faddist and frankly people know very
little about it.
I wrote an essay on this subject (HCOB 25 Mar 75 DIET, THEORY OF A
NATURAL DIET) to the effect that nobody has ever isolated the proper diet
for Homo sapiens. It gives the formula of how one would go about finding
the exact and proper diet. It tells you that all this diet faddism is based
on no data.
So, there is no thought here of putting the person on any kind of
special diet at all. There are no restrictions on what one may eat. We are
not even trying to preach against toxic foods or campaign against diet
abuses or junk foods or anything of that sort.
We are only trying to handle the accumulation of impurities built up in
the body. If you wanted to defend your body against all future impurities
then that is another program and not part of this one.
What is part of this scene is that a person will need certain nutrition
in the form of vitamin intake and minerals.
One follows his normal eating habits. There are, however, some
additions to the normal eating habits which consist of taking a quantity of
"All Blend" oil each day, secondly, drinking lots of water to help flush
out the system and thirdly, ensuring that the vitamin and mineral intake is
adequate.
To put a person on a diet different than that to which he is accustomed
is to introduce a sudden change in the midst of these other changes. A
change of diet might be just one too many changes and is an additive to
this rundown.
Oil
There is an oil called "All Blend" which has the four essential oils in
it (soy, walnut, peanut and safflower oil) which is available in the US in
health food stores. If this type of oil is not obtainable elsewhere, one
could blend it from these four oils in the proper amounts, or find an
adequate substitute. "All Blend" oil would be best but any oil used must be
cold-pressed and polyunsaturated. The oil must be kept refrigerated so that
it does not go rancid.
Toxic substances tend to lock up mainly, but not exclusively, in the
fat tissue of the body. (There is no such thing as a fat cell.) The theory,
then, is that one could replace the fat tissues that hold these
accumulations. The body will actually tend to hold onto something it is
short of. Thus, if you try to get rid of something it is short of, it won't
give it up. So, in the matter of oil, if the person takes some oil the body
might possibly exchange the good oil for the bad fat in the body. That is
the basic theory.
It is a theory of exchange. It is based on the Have-Waste formulas and
processes which were extant in Scientology in the late '50s. That whole
body of data applies to this oil's scene.
(Ref: PAB No. 123 THE REALITY SCALE
1 Nov 57 Vol III, page 136
HCOB 29 May 58 Special Bulletin STANDARD CLEAR
PROCEDURE AND AN EXPERIMENTAL
ROAD: CLEARING BY VALENCES, Vol III,
page 273
SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008, page 117
ASSOCIATE NEWSLETTER NO. 2, 1953, ca. early May, Vol. 1, page
330
ASSOCIATE NEWSLETTER NO. 7, 1953, ca. late July, Vol 1, page
412)
If one wants somebody to clean up the fat tissue in the body, he had
better give the body some fat in order to make up for the fat tissues the
body is now releasing or changing. The effort is to get the body to take
good oil or fat in exchange for the bad fat it is holding onto. In this way
we have some chance of getting the body to release fatty tissue which is
impregnated with toxic substances.
How Much Oil?
The exact quantity of oil needed by the person on the rundown has not
been definitely established, but it is very likely somewhere between two
tablespoonsful and a half a cup. One tablespoonful of oil is not going to
accomplish much. Too little oil won't let the body substitute the fat
tissue. If too much is given it can cause diarrhea. One way to test for the
right amount of oil for the person would be to put him on a scale and keep
a close check on his weight. This should be done routinely in any event
when a person is on the Purification Rundown. If the fat is being replaced
in the body despite the intake of oil then the weight will not go up. If
the body is simply assimilating the oil, with no exchange in fat tissue,
the weight will go up. Change in weight would tend to indicate whether or
not the body was exchanging old fat tissue for new fat tissue or simply
adding new fat tissue.
All people, be they fat or thin, have some fatty tissue. Some of course
have more fat stored in their bodies than others. On this program we simply
want to get rid of the fat that contains the toxic substances, we are not
even trying to make people lose weight.
(Worth mentioning here is also the fact, particularly in regard to thin
people, that while toxic substances lock up mainly in fat tissue it does
not mean that the person cannot have drug deposits inside cells.)
One could not expect the results that can be achieved on the
Purification Rundown without sufficient oil intake.
Nutritional Deficiencies
Having been an early discoverer and instigator of vitamin therapy over
the past 29 years, I know whereof I speak on the subject of nutritional
deficiencies. My work covering vitamins and deficiencies, stimulants and
depressants and the field of biochemistry goes back to the spring of 1950.
Though I have been interested in vitamins primarily only as they might
aid, speed or assist auditing, my research along this line has been
extensive. This is not to devalue the work and contributions of others in
the nutritional fields.
It takes a mere skimming of the surface of this subject, however, to
recognize that the Purification Rundown will not be effective in the face
of a vitamin or mineral deficiency in the person.
One of the things that toxins and drugs do is create nutritional
deficiencies in the body in the form of vitamin and mineral deficiencies.
Obviously a C deficiency, a B
Complex deficiency and a niacin deficiency are brought about by drugs.
There may be other deficiencies that we are not aware of at this time. But
that list is certain.
Also, alcohol, for example, depends for its effects on a person being
able to burn up B1. When it burns up all the B1 in the system the person
goes into DTs (delirium tremens) and nightmares.
In the case of other toxic substances the probability exists that other
vitamins besides B1 are burned up. What we seem to have hit on here is that
the LSD and street drugs burn up not only B1 and B Complex (which we assume
they do) but also create a deficiency in niacin in the body and that they
possibly depend on niacin (one of the B Complex vitamins) for their effect.
It is easily seen that there is a wide range of toxic substances which
create nutritional deficiencies.
It is quite vital that any vitamin or mineral deficiency is being
handled while the person is on this rundown.
In the piloting and development of the Purification Rundown, the most
effective handling for this was found to be starting the person on the
following:
Vitamin A-approximately 5000 IU per day.
Vitamin B Complex-approximately 2 caps per day. Ensure the Vitamin B2
and B6 are balanced (approximately the same amount of each).
Vitamin By-special additional amounts of B1 are required, 250-500 mg or
greater daily, depending on the amount of niacin given.
Vitamin C-250-1000 mg daily, depending upon the person's tolerance. (As
Vitamin C can cause stomach problems or diarrhea, each person's tolerance
must be worked out.)
Vitamin C has to be increased in proportion to the niacin given.
Records exist wherein Vitamin C has become so deficient in a drug user that
he used up tens of thousands of milligrams per day before he began to
eliminate any. Vitamin C deficiencies result in scurvy. "Live C" from raw
onions or raw potatoes is sometimes necessary in addition to synthetic C
and were the traditional remedies for scurvy.
Vitamin D-approximately 400 IU daily.
Vitamin E-approximately 800 IU daily.
Niacin-100 mg daily to begin.
It is then increased gradiently to as high as 5000 mg. Particularly B1
and C have to keep pace with it as it is increased in dosage.
Cal-Mag-one glass daily, at least.
Multi-Minerals-(a balanced combination of minerals).
These would then be increased proportionately according to need and/or
niacin increase as the person progressed on the rundown.
A person may have certain vitamin deficiencies which are not handled by
the above. When he routes onto the Purification Rundown he should be sent
to the Medical Officer or a medical doctor who would determine what, if
any, additional vitamin deficiencies he might have. Any such not covered in
the above list would then be handled with specific supplements for those
deficiencies.
Vitamins would be taken after meals or with yoghurt. If taken on an empty
stomach they could cause stomach burn.
NIACIN
Niacin, as one of the B Complex vitamins, is essential to nutrition. It
is so vital to the effectiveness of the Purification Rundown that it
requires some extensive mention here.
It can produce some startling and in the end very beneficial results
when taken properly on the rundown, along with the other necessary vitamins
and minerals in sufficient and proportionate quantities and along with
proper running and sweat out.
Its effects can be quite dramatic so one should understand what niacin
is and does and have a good R-Factor on it when starting the rundown. Taken
in sufficient quantities it appears to break up and unleash LSD, marijuana
and other drugs and poisons from the tissues and cells. It can rapidly
release LSD crystals into the system and send a person who has taken LSD on
a trip. (One fellow who had done the earlier sweat out for a period of
months and who believed he had no more LSD in his system took 100 mg of
niacin and promptly turned on a restimulation of a full blown LSD trip!)
Running and sweating must be done in conjunction with taking niacin to
ensure the toxic substances it releases actually do get flushed out of the
body.
Niacin: Background History
Niacin's biochemical reaction is my own private, personal discovery. In
the middle of the 1950s, I was doing work on radiation and I worked out
that it must be niacin that operated on radiation. I was recently told by a
doctor that the Dianazene formula of that time is remarkably workable
today.
Niacin runs out radiation. It will often cause a very hot flush and
prickly, itchy skin which can last up to an hour or longer. It may also
bring on chills or make a person feel tired.
The outpoint in medical thinking has been that they thought the niacin
itself turned on a flush. So they invented something called niacinamide to
keep from turning on this flush. Niacin all by its lonesome does not turn
on any flush. What it starts to do is immediately run out sunburn or
radiation. So the niacinamide they invented is worthless and it should be
mentioned that it is.
In 1973 someone got a Nobel Prize for curing insanity with niacin, but
it was fairly marked that he didn't know the facts of what was actually
happening because it was then promptly abandoned as people found that
prolonged quantities of niacin "gave very bad side effects." The truth of
the matter is that if one continues niacin, always along with the other
necessary vitamins in proper amounts, the bad effects will vanish. In other
words, the work I did on this was picked up and misapplied and then
abandoned. This is the background history of niacin.
Now more recently doctors in megavitamin research have been
administering niacin to get people through withdrawal symptoms or get them
over bad drug kicks and they have been using enormous doses of, for
example, 5000 mg.
I have no personal knowledge that such enormous doses are necessary for
handling drugs. It is very possible that, given the combination of all the
points on the Purification Rundown, many people would be able to handle
drugs with lesser amounts of niacin, something under 5000 mgs.
Niacin Theory
In theory, niacin apparently does not do anything by itself. It is
simply interacting with niacin deficiencies which already exist in the
cellular structure. It doesn't turn on
allergies; it runs out allergies. Evidently anything that niacin does is
the result of running out and running through past deficiencies.
CAUTION: The manifestations niacin produces can be quite horrifying.
Some of the somatics and manifestations the person may turn on are not just
somatics in lots of cases, in my experience. I have seen a full blown case
of skin cancer turn on and run out. So, a person can turn on skin cancer
with this and if that should happen if niacin is continued the skin cancer
has run out completely.
Other things that may turn on are hives, flu symptoms, gastroenteritis
(inflammation of the mucous membrane of the stomach and intestine), aching
bones, upset stomach or a fearful or terrified condition. There seems to be
no limit to the variety of phenomena that may occur with niacin. If it is
there to turn on by niacin it apparently will do so with niacin.
The two vital and proven facts here are:
1. When the niacin was carried on until these things discharged they did
run out, as they will do. (Sometimes people chicken out on it and don't
finish the course and it leaves them hung up. This should not be
allowed to happen.)
IT IS A MATTER OF RECORD THAT WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF WHERE
NIACIN IS CONCERNED.
2. When the niacin dosage was increased and the whole lot of the rest of
the vitamins being taken was also increased proportionately, the niacin
itself, taken in large amounts, did not create a vitamin deficiency.
Increasing Niacin and Other Vitamin Quantities
Most persons who have done the Purification Rundown started niacin at
100 mgs a day (some took lesser amounts, depending upon tolerance) and
increased the dosage as they progressed.
The best results were obtained when niacin was taken all at one time,
not split up during the day. Taken with water on an empty stomach it can be
very upsetting. It is found to be best taken after a meal or with yoghurt
or milk.
To increase the dosage, a specific quantity of niacin was administered
each day until the effect that dosage produced diminished. One would then,
next day, up the dosage on a gradient, say in amounts of 100 mg. In this
way you get an overlap of the old dosage becoming useless and the new
dosage being needed. This tended to speed up the action considerably when
continued each time the effect of the dosage diminished.
The other vitamins would have to be increased proportionately to niacin
at the same time the niacin is increased as they are interacting in the
deficiencies and more are needed.
It was found essential that C, B1 and other B vitamins need to be given
in ratio to the niacin being fed. In other words, as you up the niacin you
would up the B1 and the B Complex. And also as the niacin is upped, the
Vitamin C would be upped. These things would have to be kept in ratio.
The theory here is that one, by overdosing one vitamin, can create a
deficiency artificially of another vitamin. This is a principle I hit upon
as early as 1950 and proved it.
You can actually create a deficiency in C by administering B and
calcium. All you have to do is pump those things to the guy in very very
heavy dosages and he will develop the deficiency characteristics of C. His
teeth begin to hurt. Then when you give
him C the manifestations go away. In other words, an overdose of X and Y
can apparently create a deficiency in vitamin Z.
The reason for all this is that a vitamin is making certain changes in
the body and these changes to occur fully also require the additional
vitamin. But that additional vitamin isn't there. So it gives the
manifestation of being in deficiency. All of this is my own private theory;
it isn't anywhere else and it hasn't been subjected to tremendous and
intensive research. But I sure can turn on a Vitamin C deficiency in
anybody by overadministering B and calcium.
In other words, vitamin rations would have to be in proportion to one
another.
MINERALS
Between 1945 and 1973 I studied the endocrine system. In 1973 it seemed
that minerals and trace minerals operating in the blood stream and
circulated by other body fluids were a key to glandular interactions. The
theory is: Every gland in the body specializes in one or more minerals and
actually that is how they make themselves interact one with another. The
endocrine system of the body monitors the endocrine system of the body
apparently through minerals.
As various drugs upset the whole endocrine system of the body you can
see that the moment you start administering vitamins and sweat out and
things like that you're going to get a mineral demand in the body.
Therefore, there would need to be certain mineral dosages right along with
the rest of this package.
The principle here is that by giving one or two vitamins in excess
amount you can create a nutritional deficiency of another vitamin which
isn't being given or isn't being given in enough quantity.
Thus, what could slow down the Purification Rundown and make it appear
unflat would be a nutritional failure-a failure to flank the niacin on
either side by sufficient amounts of the other needed vitamins and minerals
in proportion and a food intake which includes vegetables and oil.
In such a case one would be looking at created nutritional deficiencies-
not conditions which were there to begin with to be run out.
Not knowing these things is probably what made the medics earlier
believe that niacin had side effects. The side effects were probably
somatics and manifestations half run out and deficiencies created by not
flanking niacin with the other vitamins and minerals and oils necessary to
cause a rebuild.
CAL-MAG
Calcium is a must where any healing or exchange process is involved as
it is a basic building block. But more important, it is calcium which
affects the nervous system. I do not know the total relationship between
calcium and toxic substances (and neither does anyone else) but it actually
exists. The rationale back of this is that calcium in deficiency sets a
person up for spasms. Nerve spasms occur in the absence of calcium. A
person who thinks he is in high tension or something of the sort may simply
have a calcium deficiency .
Calcium would be administered in company with magnesium. Magnesium
itself has been proven necessary to keep the nerves smoothed out. The
proven ratio is one half the quantity of magnesium to the quantity of
calcium.
Something else odd about calcium is that it has to have an acidic base
to operate in. If the system is too alkaline the calcium will not release
the positive ion which makes it possible for the calcium to operate in the
cellular structure and go through the vein walls and the intestinal walls
and so forth. In other words, in an alkaline system
calcium is ineffective and inactive. So this brings us up to vinegar, which
would add the acidic base. With calcium, magnesium and vinegar, in their
correct quantities, in water exactly per the recipe, we have Cal-Mag. That
is what "Cal-Mag" is and what it does. I developed and worked this out in
1973 against the very best biochemical background and references and tests.
Calcium and magnesium can be taken in order to prevent sore muscles.
Cal-Mag has been found to have the added benefit of balancing out the
Vitamin B1 taken, as Vitamin B1 taken without calcium can cause serious
teeth problems due to causing an imbalance of vitamins and minerals.
The Cal-Mag formula, as given in HCOB 5 Nov 74 DRUGS, MORE ABOUT is
repeated here:
1. Put one level tablespoon of calcium gluconate in a normal sized
glass.
2. Add 1/2 level teaspoon of magnesium carbonate.
3. Add 1 tablespoon of cider vinegar (at least 5% acidity).
4. Stir it well.
5. Add 1/2 glass of boiling water and stir until all the powder is
dissolved and the liquid is clear. (If this doesn't occur it could
be from poor grade or old magnesium carbonate.)
6. Fill the remainder of glass with lukewarm or cold water and
cover.
It will stay good for 2 days.
NOTE: There is a warning about Cal-Mag. Variations from the above can
produce an unsuccessful mess that can taste pretty horrible. It can be made
incorrectly so that it doesn't dissolve and become the most unpalatable,
ghastly stuff anybody ever fed anybody. Possibly made incorrectly it is
even unworkable. Made correctly it is a very clear liquid, quite pleasant
to take and palatable. So the directions should be followed very explicitly
to produce a proper Cal-Mag, pleasant to take and very beneficial.
MANIFESTATIONS
Various manifestations turn up on the Purification Program and these
can vary widely from person to person. Anything from insect bites to a full
blown restimulation of an LSD trip may turn on and these all simply run
themselves out and blow as the program is continued. If there are heavy
drugs to be flushed out it is not uncommon for the person to experience a
restim of whatever the effects of the drug or medicine were when he first
took it. Old injuries or old somatics may turn on, flare up for a brief
spell and vanish.
It is important to note that a given manifestation which turns on may
turn on and vanish wholly or partly in any given day. Then it may turn on
again the following day but less. If one increases the vitamin and mineral
dosage at this time, the manifestation will turn on again. But it will be
less. These things don't become more and more violent day by day, they
become less and less day by day, providing the whole Purification Rundown
is continued properly. At length, the vitamins, minerals, etc. no longer
turn the manifestation on and it is gone. There is evidence that no amount
of vitamins and mineral dosage above a certain final level for the given
individual will turn the manifestation on again. The trick is to take a
proper gradient with the vitamins and minerals. When you go out gradient
they can turn on awfully hard so don't get in a rush. And don't chicken out
either.
Emotions that have been shut off may start to reappear. The person can
blow through stupidity and become more aware. He may find he can do actions
more easily and consequences start to take on a new meaning to him. Memory
can return.
At first some individuals may feel other-determinism about doing this
program but that will gradually change and he or she will want to do it on
his own determinism and for his or her own welfare. Most individuals
embrace it with enthusiasm.
As long as the precautions listed earlier are well taken and the
procedure followed exactly as given, the solution to any manifestation is
to continue the program until the phenomenon blows. The manifestations
become less and less frequent until finally they cease altogether.
TRIPS
If a person is having trips during the program, he should take a lot of
extra Vitamin B Complex and Vitamin C in correct ratio to other vitamins as
these aid the body, especially the liver in getting rid of the drugs in the
system. Normally the vitamins and minerals in the program are sufficient
for the body to handle the residual drugs which come out.
ADMINISTRATION
The advices on the administration of the Purification Rundown are taken
from the practical experience of large pilot projects. They should not be
lightly disregarded. One may find that people administering the program
tend to enter their own fads and hobbies into it, or needing it themselves,
avoid delivering it. The Purification Rundown runs best when purely
delivered.
Any org or person administering it should:
A. Get a signed release or quit claim from the person as is usual.
B. See that the person understands that the action is being undertaken
to help free him as a spirit and is not a medical treatment.
C. No medication of a medical nature; vitamins, minerals and oils are
food.
D. Brief the person as to what he can expect and why, making no
promises.
E. Getting his promise to follow orders and complete the rundown and not
blow it because it's uncomfortable or because he is lazy or has other
appointments.
Testing
A battery of tests should be done on the individual and should be done
before and after the Purification Rundown. These would include OCA, IQ, any
learning rate tests that may exist and any other tests which would give a
before and after picture of the person. These of course, include weight,
blood pressure, etc.
The Purification Program must be tightly supervised to be successful.
The program is done under the close supervision of the Medical Officer, the
Purification Program In Charge and the Case Supervisor.
Purification Program In Charge
The In Charge will be the D of P (for org public) or the DPE or other
appointed person (for org staff). The Program I/C must closely supervise
each person's progress on the program and must ensure the program is done
faithfully and with all points of the program in. When supervising a large
group, the Program I/C is assisted by one or more deputies and a
Purification Program Admin, who maintains the progress board, handles
filing in pc folders and transports folders to and from the C/S.
The person's daily schedule must be set up so that he is always running
or sweating in the sauna with at least one other person. It is important,
especially when a group of people are doing the Purification Program at the
same time, that musters and
roll calls are held by the Program I/C or his deputy. Where individuals are
not doing the program in a group, they should twin up and each twin assumes
responsibility for the other and sees that he does the program fully.
Anyone not keeping to his schedule or the program as written is handled
by the Program I/C with warnings, cramming, chits, or ethics, as needed.
THE PROGRAM I/C IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SEEING THAT EVERYONE PARTICIPATING
IN THE PROGRAM GETS THROUGH IT CORRECTLY AND COMPLETELY AND ATTESTS TO IT
UPON COMPLETION.
Medical Officer
Before beginning the Purification Program, a person must first get
written Medical Officer okay. The Medical Officer gives a person okay to go
onto the program only after ensuring that the person's blood pressure is
normal and that he is not anemic. The M.O. does these checks himself where
he is trained to do so. He also checks for any vitamin and mineral
deficiencies the person may have and gets him onto a program of vitamin and
mineral supplements to correct this. A thorough medical examination by a
doctor may, in some cases, be required before a person is given a medical
okay to begin the Purification Program.
While on the program, the person daily reports in to the Medical
Officer who issues him his vitamins, minerals, niacin and oil and sees how
he is doing. Blood pressure and anemia checks are redone as needed. He also
writes up any needed medical reports on the person and these are
immediately filed in his pc folder for the C/S to inspect.
Case Supervisor
C/S okay to begin the program is required. The C/S then continues to
supervise the progress of each person on the program on a daily basis.
It must be noted that this is a fully C/Sed action.
Daily Reports
Each program participant writes a daily report which includes:
1. How long he jogged.
2. How long he sweated in the sauna.
3. Vitamins taken and in what amount.
4. Minerals taken and in what amount.
5. Niacin taken and in what amount.
6. Cal-Mag taken and in what amount.
7. Salt taken and in what amount.
8. Weight (include any gain or loss).
9. Any occurrences, somatics, restimulations.
10. Wins.
The daily reports are given to the Program I/C or his deputy or are
placed in his basket. They are read by the I/C to ensure the person is
doing the program and then filed in his pc folder, which goes in to the
C/S.
The C/S verifies each person's daily progress (initialling the daily
report and any medical reports to show he has inspected them) and writes
orders to correct any out-tech found, such as not taking the right
vitamins, etc.
The folder is returned to the Program I/C who checks the written C/S
and executes any C/S orders, such as getting the person back onto the
correct vitamins, getting the person to attest, and so on. The program is
run in this fashion until it is completed.
END PHENOMENA
The purpose of this program is very simply to clean out and purify
one's system of all the accumulated impurities such as drugs, insecticides
and pesticides, food preservatives, etc., etc. For someone who has taken
LSD or Angel Dust this would include getting rid of any residual crystals
from the body.
When this has been accomplished the program is complete.
As the person goes through the Purification Program, one should be able
to see an improvement in his physical well-being as he rids the system of
its accumulated impurities.
Obviously if the person is still feeling the effects of past drugs or
chemicals going into restimulation, the program cannot be considered
complete and must be continued until all these manifestations have turned
off completely.
The product of this program is a purified body, free from the
impurities, drugs, etc., that had accumulated in it.
It is up to the C/S to send the person to attest when the above product
has been achieved.
A continuation of the vitamins, minerals, oil, vegetables and Cal-Mag,
at least at the rate of recommended daily requirements in balanced amounts
is wise after the rundown is completed. A sudden cessation of such a heavy
vitamin dosage can itself produce a letdown. It is possible the person
should come off them on a steep gradient rather than abruptly.
Particularly, where drug damage to the brain or nerves has occurred, the
body needs these things to rebuild itself. If one doesn't do the above
there can be a brief apparency of a letdown.
Remember that the person has probably been leading an unhealthy life
without proper nutrition, sleep and exercise so it would be a good idea to
recommend moderate daily dietetic and exercise disciplines so he will stay
healthy, having nothing to do with therapy.
If such a letdown occurs the C/S should take the above into account,
otherwise he may be puzzled. He will find a certain number skimped the
rundown are unflat but the majority of such simply went back to an
exerciseless, five packs of cigs a day, vitamin and mineral deprived life.
Such regimen recommendations are up to people who specialize in them. No
fads please. The C/S must remember that the person should now be restored
to any interrupted program or C/Sed for his next level or, if he is also
PTS. should be de-PTSed. For most the next C/S would be Objective
Processing. The person has not finished his processing with the
Purification Rundown. He has just cleared the way to get real case gains.
LENGTH OF PROGRAM
One should be able to get through the whole program in two weeks at
five hours a day. Some will take more and some will take less.
If the procedure in this HCOB is exactly followed this will not become
a long, drawn-out action.
SUMMARY
With the Purification Program we now have the means to get rapid
recovery from the effects of the accumulation of the environmental chemical
poisons as well as the medical drugs and street drugs which inhibit the
progress of cases.
By reducing the time required for sweat out and increasing its
efficiency, we are able to make the Purification Program a single, easily
completed step.
With the inclusion of vitamins, minerals and oils we are able to work
toward restoring the biochemical balance of the body and make it possible
for the body to reconstruct itself from the damage done by drugs and other
biochemical substances.
We have brought the person up to the level where he is now ready for
processing and can truly achieve biophysical and then mental and spiritual
gain.
From this step alone one will see some sparkling results.
The Purification Rundown should be ideally followed by auditing. The
type of auditing most beneficial for the next step is "Objective
Processing." An enormous body of work exists for this next level, none of
which is changed by the Purification Rundown. The Purification Rundown only
undercuts it. As the world sinks we get below it to prop it up!
Let's give this program a total push and take a major step toward a
drug-free society and planet!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The Purification Rundown has as its sole purpose the handling of the
restimulative effects of drugs and toxic residuals on a spiritual being.
The Purification Rundown is a spiritual activity based on and administered
according to the doctrine and practices of the religion of Scientology as
set forth in the writings of L. Ron Hubbard and adopted by the Church. No
part of the rundown is intended as the diagnosis, prescription for, or
treatment of any bodily or physical condition or ill. The Church is not
responsible for the handling of any bodily or physical condition or ill, it
being the responsibility of the individual to seek the competent medical
advice and treatment of his doctor in such matters.
THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 FEBRUARY 1978RA- 1
ADDITION OF 20 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
-ERRATA AND ADDITIONS
Amendment to HCOB 6 Feb 78RA, THE PURIFICATION
RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
ERRATA
In HCOB 6 Feb 78RA, THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT
PROGRAM, under "Exercise and Sauna," page 167, in the twelfth paragraph
from the top of the page, a clarification was omitted at the end of the
last sentence. This paragraph, with the full clarification added, is
amended to read:
"Running is done on a daily basis once the person has been assigned
to this program. It is done in a rubberized or vinyl-type sweat suit
when persons are not also being given sauna or steam bath treatment.
When the Purification Rundown is being delivered with the sauna, the
rubberized or vinyl-type sweat suit is omitted in running but the
running is still done and is a necessary part of the rundown."
In other words, when the person is doing the Purification Rundown
standardly and using the sauna he must also run to work up his circulation
prior to going into the sauna, but he does not wear a rubberized or vinyl-
type sweat suit when he runs. When a sauna is not available, some but much
slower results are obtained by running in a rubberized sweat suit, as in
the original Sweat Out Program, which has now been supplemented by my later
discoveries.
ADDITIONS
Exercise and Sauna
As stated in HCOB 6 Feb 78RA, the bulk of the 5 hours daily period of
running and sauna sweat out is best spent in the sauna after the
circulation has been worked up by running.
It should be reemphasized here that the 5-hour period is NOT 50%
exercising and 50% sauna. The rundown gives best results and works like a
bomb with a much lower percentage of time exercising and a much higher
percentage in the sauna.
Sauna
When people get too warm or feeling faint, or when the body temperature
gets too high in the sauna, it is permissible for one to go out and take a
shower and then go back into the sauna. One could get over-heated to the
point of simply keeling over due to the heat, and the handling for this is
to take a cold shower. People who are having a hard time spending
consecutive hours in the sauna are permitted to do so.
A similar manifestation can be caused by lack of salt or potassium, so
one must watch for any symptoms of salt or potassium depletion and handle
such manifestations with extra salt intake or potassium gluconate tablets,
as covered on page 168 of HCOB 6 Feb 78RA.
It is advisable not to fall asleep in the sauna as overheating or salt or
potassium depletion could occur while one was asleep.
Steam Baths
Steam baths, at similar temperatures to the sauna, can be used by
themselves when available. They serve much the same purpose as the dry
sauna and it has been suggested that a steam bath may even work faster, but
this has not been tested or confirmed. The steam bath is not preferable to
a sauna but produces a similar effect. Either can be used.
The same tips and precautions apply to the use of a steam bath as to
the sauna.
Eucalyptus Oil
A small quantity of eucalyptus oil is sometimes added to the steam in a
steam bath or similarly used in some saunas.
In a modern sauna or steam bath, the procedure is to simply put one or
two capfuls of eucalyptus oil in a bucket of water in the room. As it then
evaporates (the oil will evaporate before the water does), more can be
added as needed.
Some people don't like the smell of eucalyptus at all, while others
find it pleasant. If the solution is too strong it can cause watering of
the eyes or nausea in some cases. Thus, one would survey before using it
and, if used, it should be in appropriate small quantities.
Used correctly, eucalyptus has been reported to be beneficial in
clearing up the lungs and clearing the sinuses. One person has reported his
voice smoothing out as a result of using eucalyptus oil in the sauna.
It is not a mandatory step on the Purification Rundown, but as an
optional step the data given here on the use of eucalyptus oil in the sauna
or steam bath should be known.
Whether or not eucalyptus is used, it goes without saying that a sauna
or steam bath should be kept hygienic and free of odors by scrubbing the
room at least once, or oftener, daily.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1 978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MARCH 1978RA
Remimeo REVISED 14 NOVEMBER 1979
(CANCELS BTB 16 Dec 73, Word Clearing
Series 51, WORD CLEARING ERRORS.)
(Revisions not printed in a different type style)
Word Clearing Series 59RA
CLEARING WORDS
(Ref: HCOB 7 Sep 74 Word Clearing Series 54
SUPERLITERACY AND THE
CLEARED WORD
HCOB 17 Jul 79 I Word Clearing Series 64
THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD,
DEFINED)
In research concerning Word Clearing, study and training done with
various groups over the recent past months, it has become all too obvious
that a misunderstood word remains misunderstood and will later hang a
person up unless he clears the meaning of the word in the context of the
materials being read or studied and also clears it in all of its various
uses in general communication.
When a word has several different definitions, one cannot limit his
understanding of the word to one definition only and call the word
"understood." One must be able to understand the word when, at a later
date, it is used in a different way.
HOW TO CLEAR A WORD
To clear a word one looks it up in a good dictionary. Dictionaries
recommended are The Oxford English Dictionary or the Shorter Oxford
Dictionary and Funk and Wagnalls Standard English Dictionary.
The first step is to look rapidly over the definitions to find the one
which applies to the context in which the word was misunderstood. One reads
the definition and uses it in sentences until one has a clear concept of
that meaning of the word. This could require ten or more sentences.
Then one clears each of the other definitions of that word, using each
in sentences until one has a conceptual understanding of each definition.
The next thing to do is to clear the derivation-which is the
explanation of where the word came from originally. This will help gain a
basic understanding of the word.
Don't clear the technical or specialized definitions (math, biology,
etc.) or obsolete (no longer used) or archaic (ancient and no longer in
general use) definitions unless the word is being used that way in the
context where it was misunderstood.
Most dictionaries give the idioms of a word. An idiom is a phrase or
expression whose meaning cannot be understood from the ordinary meanings of
the words. For example, "give in" is an English idiom meaning "yield."
Quite a few words in English have idiomatic uses and these are usually
given in a dictionary after the definitions of the word itself. These
idioms have to be cleared.
One must also clear any other information given about the word, such as
notes on its usage, synonyms, etc. so as to have a full understanding of
the word.
If one encounters a misunderstood word or symbol in the definition of a
word being cleared, one must clear it right away using this same procedure
and then return to the definition one was clearing. (Dictionary symbols and
abbreviations are usually given in the front of the dictionary.)
EXAMPLE
You are reading the sentence "He used to clean chimneys for a living"
and you're not sure what "chimneys" means.
You find it in the dictionary and look through the definitions for the
one that applies. It says "A flue for the smoke or gases from a fire."
You're not sure what "flue" means so you look that up: it says "A
channel or passage for smoke, air or gasses of combustion." That fits and
makes sense so you use it in some sentences until you have a clear concept
of it.
"Flue" in this dictionary has other definitions, each of which you
would clear and use in sentences.
Look up the derivation of the word "flue."
Now go back to "chimney." The definition "A flue for the smoke or gases
from a fire," now makes sense so you use it in sentences until you have a
concept of it.
You then clear the other definitions. One dictionary has an obsolete
definition and a geological definition. You would skip both of these as
they aren't in common usage.
Now clear up the derivation of the word. One finds in the derivation
that it originally came from the Greek word "kaminos," which means
"furnace."
If the word had any synonym studies, usage notes or idioms, they would
all be cleared too.
That would be the end of clearing "chimney."
CONTEXT UNKNOWN
If you don't know the context of the word, as in Word Clearing Methods
1, 5 (when done from a list), 6 or 8, you should start with the first
definition and clear all definitions, derivation, idioms, etc. as covered
above.
"WORD CHAINS"
If you find yourself spending a lot of time clearing words within
definitions of words, you should get a simpler dictionary. A good
dictionary will enable you to clear a word without having to look up a lot
of other ones in the process.
CLEARED WORDS
A CLEARED WORD IS ONE WHICH HAS BEEN CLEARED TO THE POINT OF FULL
CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING BY CLEARING EACH OF THE COMMON MEANINGS OF
THAT WORD PLUS ANY TECHNICAL OR SPECIALIZED MEANINGS OF THAT WORD THAT
PERTAIN TO THE SUBJECT BEING HANDLED.
That's what a cleared word is. It is a word that is understood. In metered
Word Clearing this would be accompanied by a floating needle and very good
indicators. There can be more than one F/N per word. Clearing a word must
end in an F/N and VGIs. Off the meter this would be accompanied by very
good indicators.
The above is the way a word should be cleared.
When words are understood, communication can take place and with
communication any given subject can be understood.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1978R
Issue I
NED Checksheets REVISED 31 JANUARY 1979
All Supervisors
All C/Ses (Revisions not printed in a different type style)
All Auditors
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RDs
(Ref: HCOB 19 Sep 78R THE END OF ENDLESS
Iss II DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR
Rev. 31.1.79 LIST)
The possibility of running a Drug RD flat on a pc is totally zilch and
the reason for this is that there have been innumerable cultures in the
several universes that were far more drug oriented than this one. And even
on a person that's not manifesting drugs and hasn't taken any this
lifetime, you can collide with these cultures and universes if you keep
pushing it.
Over the years some pcs have had Drug Rundowns which stretched
interminably into hundreds of hours. And some pcs have had drugs handled
once, only to have them rehandled and then rehandled again at some later
date in what appear to have been endless Drug Rundowns.
This has been largely due to the listing and running of whole track
drugs or, through Dianetic auditing errors, the collision with and
restimulation of early drug cultures on the track.
This endless auditing of drugs can have built up charge which is
preventing the pc from getting all the gain possible from his next grade,
or it can even act to prevent him from wanting further auditing.
There is an end to endless drug handling.
We have it now in a rundown which is called The End of Endless Drug
Rundowns Repair List.
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST
(Ref: HCOB 19 Sept 78R, Issue II,
Rev. 31.1.79, same title.)
A prerequisite for this rundown is the C/S 53RL to F/Ning list. (The
C/S 53 is not included as a part of the rundown itself, but is done
separately as a set-up action.)
When properly set up, the pc is given THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS
REPAIR LIST and any reading items handled as indicated.
This rundown is for those pcs who have previously been run on an old
Drug Rundown, done by old style drug handling. (Rarely, if ever, would it
apply to a person audited on the NED new Drug Rundown as covered in HCOB 15
July 71RC, NED Series 9RB, DRUG HANDLING.)
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST resolves the situation for
a pc who has been overaudited on drugs, who has been misrun on drugs, who
has had an endless Drug Rundown and/or who has bypassed charge on auditing
on drugs.
It simply and terminatedly cleans up any overrun, misrun or unrun drugs and
the charge left with the pc as a result of these. In fairly short order it
gets the pc truly completed on the subject, in good shape and ready to
continue on his next case action.
A lot of cases will now be sorted out and the speed of moving up the
Bridge will be greatly increased.
NEW ERA DIANETICS DRUG RUNDOWN A SEPARATE ACTION
The NED Drug Rundown (HCOB 15 July 71 RC, Issue III, IMPORTANT URGENT,
C/S Series 48RD, NED Series 9RB, DRUG HANDLING) is an entirely separate
action from THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST.
The NED Drug Rundown is for beginning Dianetic pcs or those who have
not previously had a Drug Rundown.
Its steps have been arranged to prevent the endless running and
rehandling of drugs.
You can always find more drugs on the track. What you're interested in
is this lifetime and this body. This doesn't mean you don't run track on
the Drug RD, you just don't push it. Don't ask for whole track drugs. When
you list out the drugs, medicine and alcohol a pc has taken, you only want
the ones he has taken this lifetime.
Objectives are run first on the pc. Each reading drug, medicine or
alcohol the pc has taken this lifetime is then run narrative, followed by
preassessment then prior assessment and, as a final step, more Objectives
are given to bring the pc into PT after the engram running. The full and
complete steps are listed in HCOB 15 July 71RC, URGENT IMPORTANT, C/S
Series 48RD, NED Series 9RB, DRUG HANDLING and HCOB 22 June 78R, NED Series
2R, NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE.
These refined and thorough steps allow the Drug Rundown to be taken to
a flat point of freedom from the harmful effects of this lifetime drugs,
medicine and alcohol and an F/Ning drug list.
Where the old Drug Rundown took hundreds of hours and sometimes had to
be repeated, the NED Drug Rundown requires only a few intensives to
accomplish the final, finished result.
With the tech of these two separate rundowns-one for the new pc, one
for handling the pc who has been run and rerun on drugs old style-we truly
have an end to endless drug handling.
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST is to be put to full use
to rapidly handle those pcs who have been stalled and plagued by endless
drug handling.
I expect each org and mission to get it applied and get such pcs
advancing!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1978R
Remimeo Issue II
All Dn Auditors REVISED 31 JANUARY 1979
All C/Ses
(Revisions in this type style)
THE END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS
REPAIR LIST
(Ref: HCOB 19 Sep 78R, Iss 1, Rev. 31 Jan 79,
THE END Of ENDLESS DRUG RDs.)
The End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List is the rundown for
handling a pc who has been overaudited on drugs, who has had an endless
Drug Rundown done by old style drug auditing, and/or who has bypassed
charge on auditing on drugs.
A prerequisite for the rundown is that the pc is first set up for the
rundown with a C/S 53RL to F/Ning list. (The C/S 53 is not part of the
rundown itself but is required as a set-up action which is done
separately.)
The End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List is then delivered as a
rundown in itself.
Assess it Method 5 and handle in order of largest read.
NOTE: This list can be assessed on Dianetic Clears, Clears and OTs, but
where a reading item calls for any Dianetic auditing (items 7 and 9) it is
NOT done. (Ref: HCOB 12 Sep 78, DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs.) On
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears the handling on such items is to simply
indicate the read.
1. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU WERE NO LONGER
AFFECTED BY DRUGS? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can find that point.)
2. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU WERE RELEASED
FROM THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can find that point.)
3. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU RUN ON AN UNCHARGED DRUG?
_________
(Find which drug wasn't charged and indicate it shouldn't have been
run. May be more than one uncharged drug; handle each by indicating on
each. )
4. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU RUN ON AN UNCHARGED INCIDENT OR ITEM?
_________
(Find which and indicate it shouldn't have been run. There may be
more than one; handle each by indicating on each. )
5. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU ASKED TO LIST WHOLE TRACK DRUGS?
_________
(Indicate that this may have restimulated drugs he was not affected
by in this lifetime.)
6. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WERE YOU PREVENTED FROM GETTING GRADES OR
OTHER AUDITING? _________
(Indicate.)
7. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS AN INCIDENT OR CHAIN LEFT UNFLAT?
_________
(Indicate. Flatten the incident or chain R3RA.)
8. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS AN INCIDENT OR CHAIN OVERRUN? _________
(Indicate it. Spot the flat point.)
9. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS A CHARGED DRUG NOT RUN? _________
(Find which and handle per NED Drug RD steps.)
10. WAS THE DRUG RUNDOWN CONTINUED PAST THE POINT WHEN YOU FELT THE DRUG
LIST WAS F/NING? _________
(Indicate. Ask pc if he can spot that point.)
11. WERE YOU NOT ALLOWED TO DECLARE YOUR DRUG RUNDOWN COMPLETE?
_________
(Indicate. Let pc say what he/she wishes on this.)
12. WERE YOU TOLD YOU WERE A DRUGGIE WHEN YOU WEREN'T? _________
(Indicate it, and that pc isn't a druggie.)
13. WERE YOU AUDITED ON DIANETICS OR NEW ERA DIANETICS AFTER DIANETIC
CLEAR? _________
(If so, indicate that Dianetic auditing should not have been
continued past Dianetic Clear. )
14. ON THE DRUG RUNDOWN, WAS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(Indicate. Have pc tell you what he/she thinks this was. If no F/N,
turn it in to a Scientology C/S to handle.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr.clb
Copyright � 1978,1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1978RA
Issue I
Remimeo REVISED 21 FEBRUARY 1979
Auditors
Cl IV Grad (All changes are in this type style)
Checksheet (Ellipses indicate deletions)
Tech/Qual
(NOTE: Some auditors have had trouble with this rundown. It has
therefore been extensively revised as per this issue. Before
running a pc on this rundown, get the auditor M9ed and M4ed and
starrated on the RD. Also make sure that he can operate a meter and
do TRs if he has trouble with it in the future. These changes in
this RD are considerable and are for immediate use and the earlier
rendition of it is not to be used. Out-Int as a case condition
along with R3RA audited over and beyond Dianetic Clear are primary
reasons for case bogs. The percentage of out-Int may be as much as
75% in any given area. Therefore the Int RD run with NED on non-
Clears and the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown are the most
important single auditing actions an auditor can do and will
produce the most surprising results when the condition is present
and is expertly audited.)
Interiorization Rundown Series 4RA
URGENT-IMPORTANT
THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN
We needed a rundown that would handle what, for some pcs, has been an
endless trail of repair of repair of repair of Int.
I have now fully researched and developed the process to handle this
and can release it for broad use.
THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN is just that.
It is the answer to Int troubles.
The rundown consists of running Int by Recall by a very precise and
simple method.
At first glance it would not seem possible that such a process would
handle the more resistive-appearing Int repair problems which keep coming
up on some pcs. This appearance is deceptive, however, as the process is
very, very effective. It runs lightly and easily on pcs, but with far-
reaching results.
Skillfully handled, it quite miraculously smooths out and resolves Int
on both new pcs and those pcs on whom Int repeatedly kicks in.
Of course an Int Rundown has to be run, per HCOB 4 Jan 71R, but when it
is later found that the Int Rundown must be repaired then this rundown is
used.
It does not replace the original Int Rundown, which has been newly
revised with several more buttons and New Era Dianetics commands added
(HCOB 4 Jan 71R). Rather, it complements it.
The End of Endless Int Repair RD can be run on Dianetic Clears . . . as
it addresses Int with Recalls....
(NOTE: It can NOT be run on any pc or pre-OT in the Non-interference Zone
(those between R6 Solo and OT 111 attest). As the End of Endless Int Repair
RD is a major action, not a repair action, it is forbidden to be run on
anyone in the Noninterference Zone.
Where a person in the Non-interference Zone has been run on End of
Endless Int he should finish up his current Solo level as feasible and get
onto his next Solo level.
Anyone who has been run on End of Endless Int while on OT III should be
finished up as feasible on Solo OT III and gotten onto NED for OTs.)
In certain isolated cases this process could be used as a preliminary
method for handling Int on pcs who are weak or ill and not immediately up
to running engrams or secondaries, or it could be used to cool down out-Int
on a new pc who exteriorizes on Objectives and has not yet had a Dn C/S-1
or any NED auditing.
But it is not a substitute for the revised Int Rundown and in the above
instances you may find the pc may eventually need the revised Int Rundown
itself.
The prime purpose and use of the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown is,
exactly as its name implies, to handle an endless "repair of repair of
repair" of Int. If a regular Int Rundown has been done and Int continues to
kick in after fully standard Int correction, the End of Endless Int Repair
Rundown is the answer. It effectively resolves persistent Int problems.
WHEN TO RUN AN END OF ENDLESS INT RUNDOWN
When an auditor or C/S encounters out-Int on a case there is a choice
of what action to take to handle it. The choice depends on what actions
have been taken previously on the case on the subject of Int.
The first thing to determine is whether or not Int is actually out. You
cannot audit a person on anything else besides Int, if Int is out. You also
cannot run anything which is not charged (reading), as to do so hangs the
pc with a wrong/uncharged item. An auditor getting a read on the Int
section of the C/S 53 must be careful to verify that this is a valid read,
and not a false read or protest read. This is very important as you must
not audit a pc on Int if it is not charged, and you must not audit a pc on
anything else if Int is out.
You determine whether the pc has already had an Int Rundown, and
whether it was correctly done or flubbed. If it was flubbed were Dianetic
errors repaired with an L3RF on the Dianetic chains? Has the pc had an Int
Rundown Correction List? (These must be determined because the End of
Endless Int Rundown is not a substitute for the Int Rundown, and it does
not substitute for an Int Rundown Correction List. Dianetic errors must be
repaired with an L3RF.) These must be determined by folder study and FES of
the Int Rundown and any repairs of Int Rundown.
If the pc has had an Int Rundown and it has been flubbed, you would do
an Int Rundown Correction List and handle all of the various actions
necessary, providing this is within the normal time span of the rundown.
Don't try this months or years later. The End of Endless Int Rundown will
not repair flagrant Dianetic errors. If the pc is having or was recently
given an Int Rundown which has bogged or failed, then an Int Rundown
Correction List including repair of any Dianetic errors is to be done. If
the pc still has out-Int despite having had the Int Rundown and it has been
repaired and all that is usual and ordinary has been done, then you would
do the End of Endless Int Rundown.
You must determine whether the pc is a Dianetic Clear, or whether he
has become one somewhere along the line. If the pc has had Dianetic Clear
rehabbed since the original Int RD, check the dates to determine whether
the pc was run on the Int RD by R3R or R3RA when he was a Dianetic Clear.
If so this can be repaired by indicating to the pc that he was run on the
Int RD on R3R or R3RA after Dianetic C/ear. If these Int Dianetic chains
are now reading, repair them by assessing an L3RF and indicating. (Do not
get into running or continuing any R3R or R3RA on a Dianetic Clear.) If the
person is a Dianetic Clear and Int is still out for some peculiar reason
best known to Man or beast, the only choice we have is the End of Endless
Int Rundown.
The way to determine whether Int is out is normally by assessment of
the C/S 53 buttons, and it is on this prepared list that out-Int is most
often detected. You don't flatten the button, or try to handle the button
that was found on the C/S 53. This is the one exception on the C/S 53
whereby you do not just F/N it on the C/S 53 and go on. We have to examine
the condition of the person on the subject of Int as above, to determine
which way to go. Therefore you stop right there with a C/S 53, being
careful to verify the fact that you actually have a read on Int, and not a
false read or protest read. (And remember that some pcs, especially when
Int has been run or repaired when it wasn't charged, can get so protesty on
the subject that Int will now give a false read whenever it is mentioned
due to protest. An auditor's TRs, metering and obnosis of the pc and
whether the pc is in session or not have to be bad for this to occur, or
for the auditor to now fail to determine whether it is a valid or false
read on Int.) Having determined that you do have a valid read on Int, you
would not proceed with the C/S 53, but end off the session.
INT RUNDOWN TABLE
The following table tells the auditor and C/S which way to go when
handling out-Int. Once filled out this table should be kept with the pc
Folder Summary in front inside of the pc folder beneath the pgm. And the
table should be updated.
Yes No
A. IS THE READ ON INT A VALID READ? ____ ____
Is there any evidence of the pc having been run on Int due to a false
or protest read? ____ ____
Any evidence of the read being caused by a Mis-U word? ____ ____
(If 'yes' on above get 'False read?' and 'Protest?' cleaned up or the
Mis-U cleared and recheck the buttons on Section A of C/S 53 to find
out if Int is charged.)
B. HAS THE PC HAD A FULL INT RUNDOWN? ____ ____
(If 'no' or incomplete, it would have to be repaired and completed.
NOTE: The Int RD would NOT be run on a Dianetic Clear, Clear or OT as
they are not to be run on Dianetics in any form.)
C. HAS THE PC HAD AN INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST? ____ ____
(If not, and there is any evidence of errors or lack of expected
result, this should be done before continuing the Int RD or doing End
of Endless Int Rundown. And if the pc has had several Int Rundown
Correction Lists, realize that either the auditor can't make a list
read, or is only getting false reads.)
D. HAVE ANY R3R OR R3RA DIANETIC ERRORS ON THE INT RUNDOWN BEEN
CORRECTED WITH AN L3RF? ____ ____
(If not, get these repaired, as continuing the RD, or doing End of
Endless Int Rundown won't solve R3R or R3RA errors.)
E. IS THE PC A DIANETIC CLEAR OR ABOVE? ____ ____
Was the pc a Dianetic Clear when the Int RD was run on him by R3R or
R3RA ? ____ ____
(If 'yes' to either above, you must not run any Dianetics but if Int is
still out after repairing any errors the End of Endless Int Rundown can
be done on a Dianetic Clear. It can NOT be done between R6 Solo and OT
III attest.
If the pc was run on Dianetics on the Int RD after Dn C/ear, the first
action is to indicate the error of running Dianetics after Clear, and
then repair any reading Dianetic Int chain with an L3RF, taking care to
handle the reading lines by indication only, and not get into any
running of Dianetics. This action alone will often cure any Int trouble
on a Dn Clear, but if Int is still reading you can now handle it with
the End of Endless Int Rundown.)
THE END OF ENDLESS INT RUNDOWN
PROCEDURE
Having determined that you are going to do the End of Endless Int
Rundown from the table above, you proceed as follows:
1. The auditor has the pc demonstrate the various flows. Remember that
this must not be arduous because it is actually almost auditing to do
this and the person's Int is out. If the pc is a Triple pc, have him
demonstrate Flows 1, 2, 3. If the pc is a Quad pc, have him demonstrate
Flows 1, 2, 3, 0.
(Do not engage in flying ruds, Word Clearing, Touch Assists,
Havingness or any other auditing over out-Int.)
2. Assess the End of Endless Int Rundown buttons. Take the largest read.
3. You then proceed to run this button with the End of Endless Int
Rundown. This is done by assessing the flows. Take the flow that reads
the largest and using the Recall Process that applies to that flow, run
it until an F/N is achieved.
4. Then reassess all flows. You'll find the one you ran will be F/Ning.
Another flow will be reading. Run the best reading flow by the Recall
Process until it F/Ns. You repeat this procedure until all flows F/N.
If during the period you are running these flows on that button, the
pc has a large cog, F/N, GIs, remember that you may have blown all
flows. At that moment without interrupting the pc's cognition you
realize that you are finished with assessing the flows of this button.
For caution's sake, you check the button to see if it now reads. Of
course it will F/N.
5. You now reassess the whole End of Endless Int Rundown button list.
The whole list might F/N at this point. On the other hand it might not.
If you get a read on this assessment, you treat it exactly the same as
you did priorly, (steps 3, 4, 5). You keep this up until you get an
F/Ning assessment of the Int buttons.
6. You then wait a week and reassess the Int buttons list again. If you
get a read, check for false read, check for protest. Make sure it is a
valid read that you have and if it is, you treat that button exactly
the same as above and proceed (per steps 3, 4, 5).
When you get an F/Ning assessment of the Int buttons after the one
week wait, the End of Endless Int Rundown is complete, and the pc is
sent to declare.
THE INT BUTTONS
GO IN
WENT IN
PUT IN
INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING
WANT TO GO IN
CAN'T GET IN
KICKED OUT OF SPACES
CAN'T GO IN
BEING TRAPPED
FORCED IN
PULLED IN
PUSHED IN
. . . .
EXAMPLE:
Int button assessed: PUT IN
Assess the four flows with the wordings for that button but without
using the word " Recall":
F1: . . . you were put in something x
F2: . . . you put another in something
F3: . . . others put others in something x
F0: . . . you put yourself in something sf
Flow 2 reads best, so run Flow 2 to F/N, using the entire Recall
command (i.e. "Recall a time when you put another in something"). Reassess
all four flows, as above, using the same Int button....
. . . .
Examples of the running commands for "PUT IN" would be:
If F1 reads: "Recall a time when you were put in something." (to F/N.)
If F2 reads: "Recall a time when you put another in something." (to
F/N.)
If F3 reads: "Recall a time when others put others in something." (to
F/N.)
If F0 reads: "Recall a time when you put yourself in something." (to
F/N.)
CAUTIONS AND C/S TIPS
The only time you check the button again while assessing flows is when
the pc has had a cog, F/N, GIs, at which time you must suspect that the
whole button has blown. This by the way happens in Int Rundowns and is the
commonest cause of overrun Int.
There is another way of addressing this if the pc isn't getting
cognitions to amount to anything. When you get all flows on a button
F/Ning, you can end off the session and check the next day to see if the
flows are still F/Ning. It some times happens where you have a not very
responsive pc, that it takes several days of assessment of the flows which
F/Ned yesterday to carry the F/N through a whole day. These flows often
read again the next day. This is because you are running Recall Processes,
and Recall Processes are simply key-outs. Therefore you are getting
something keying in and keying out and keying in and keying out. This is
eventually overcome. Where you are doing this day-to-day handling of the
same button, it would be vital to check the button for read before you
assessed the flows on it the next day.
The one-week wait is a compromise for the 3 to 10 day key-out period;
you can't say wait for 3 to 10 days, so it is set at one week. During the
rundown there may have been a momentary stir-up of some kind, such as a
tiny ripple on an auditor's TRs rendition, or a badly mishandled origin
that could cause an ARC break needle, or something like this could happen,
so if you wait a week such trouble will key out, before you assess the
buttons list again. Or you may have been riding a win, a persistent F/N on
one button, when the whole subject of Int is not handled, and you will get
environmental restimulation. Remember you are only handling Recalls, and a
little more Recalls run will probably blow it for good. So you are waiting
a week to see if the environment keys him in again. You reassess a week
later and if the buttons are all clean, fine. But if something reads on the
week later assessment that must mean an engram or something is pretty close
to the surface still. You then handle it again and this time the little
point that was missed will turn up and that will be the end of that. You
handle the buttons to F/Ning assessment and then that is the end of that.
The End of Endless Int Repair. (There is no second wait for another week.)
Now of course if during the one-week wait the pc gets keyed-in again or
originates or by reason of BIs or manifestation that Int is still out, you
would not robotically wait out the whole week before giving the next
session, as you now know he is not on a persistent F/N, and you know there
is more to handle.
And on the reassessment of the buttons after the week wait, the auditor
must again be sure that it is a valid read on Int and not a false or
protest read before he launches off into running anything again. False
reads on the assessment, protest reads, or the pc suffering from something
else entirely besides out-Int can cause a false read on assessment of the
Int buttons. Hence the necessity to be sure you have a valid read before
you proceed. And if the pc is caved in or BIs about it there is a little
checklist that tells a C/S what to do about that too.
The things that could go wrong are rather simple and are few in number.
These are:
a) Int wasn't out in the first place,
b) The pc has been run on false reads,
c) The pc was suffering from something else entirely other than out-Int,
d) The auditor's TRs are bad, or broke the Auditor's Code,
e) The auditor's metering was bad, giving wrong assessments,
f) The auditor overran F/Ns, or reran a flow that just F/Ned
invalidating the F/N just gotten,
g) Pc had a Mis-U on the word 'Recall' and was trying to run
through engrams on the Recall Process,
h) The pc had a major cog on the subject of Int, blowing the whole thing
and the auditor went on, overrunning the Int Rundown or End of Endless
Int Rundown,
i) Pc was audited on some other action other than Int while Int was out-
such as rudiments, Touch Assists, Word Clearing or any other auditing
or assist action, including illegal 2-way comms about his case or
auditing, coffee shop or eval or inval by his 'friends' or others
between sessions,
j) Errors on the original Int RD weren't repaired before starting the
End of Endless Int Rundown.
If a C/S can't tell by folder inspection which of these it is he can
have the pc interviewed by a D of P to find out, or even get the above
assessed to find out which it is.
VITAL DATA ON
INT RD END PHENOMENA
Exteriorization is not the EP of the Int Rundown. If it happens that
the pc goes exterior during the RD, you end off gently as in any other
auditing. But that is not the EP, and you may have to pick him up again
later and complete the Int RD or handle it with the End of Endless Int
Repair Rundown.
THE EP OF THE INT RUNDOWN IS NO MORE CONCERN OR TROUBLE WITH
EXTERIORIZATION OR INTERIORIZATION.
This is generally accomplished by auditing the pc to an F/Ning Int
button list.
But there is another phenomenon that can occur while running Int. IT IS
VITAL THAT AN AUDITOR DOES NOT MISS THIS SHOULD IT HAPPEN.
It goes like this: You're auditing along and suddenly some mass
discharges, down comes the TA, you suddenly have a floating TA, and that's
it. The pc has hit the EP.
If you proceed past that point you're in trouble. You DON'T then
reassess the Int button list and you DON'T continue running Quad Flows,
even if all the flows have not yet been run on one reading button.
You do nothing but take your paws off the meter and gently end the
session. If you do otherwise you can mess up a case.
It isn't exteriorization. Exteriorization could occur at the same time;
however we could not care less because exteriorization is not the EP of the
process.
But at ANY point at which the above phenomenon occurs on the Int RD-
mass moves off, the TA comes crashing down and you can't keep the needle on
the dial because the TA itself is floating-you end off the rundown because
you have the EP.
What has happened here is that you've blown the stuck flow of "going
in."
Int sends the TA up because the person has plowed deeper into more and
more mass and come out of less and less mass. You have been auditing the pc
on what has been, for eons, a stuck flow of obsessively going in. At any
point in the auditing that stuck flow can suddenly give way. It heaves in
the opposite direction, and the stuck flow of "going in" vanishes.
When that happens it's the end of the process, as that is all you want
to accomplish with the Int Rundown.
If you were then to check the Int button list (which you DO NOT DO AT THIS
POINT) you would find the Int buttons all F/Ning.
REPAIRING REPAIR
Over the years Int auditing has tended to be flubby. Int repair has
been far too frequent and even repetitive on some pcs. Some auditors and
C/Ses have decided Int RDs were "delicate" or "difficult" or very special.
Well, Int is special and sometimes delicate, but it's not difficult.
If an auditor is going to audit the Int Rundown successfully he must be
skilled at metering, he must be flubless on R3RA and the commands of the
process, and understand the theory of Int. He must know what an F/N is and
what a Dianetic EP is and be able to recognize these when they occur.
Much of the Int repair needed stems from errors made by auditors (or
C/Ses): running Int when it was not needed, running it with the idea it
would exteriorize the pc, auditing the RD over misunderstoods, overrunning
the RD. These are all violations of the Auditor's Code, many of them then
further complicated by Dianetic errors in running or repairing Int.
There is another factor regarding the original Int Rundown which must
not be overlooked. Although it comes under the heading of "overrunning the
Int Rundown," it is sometimes neither seen nor understood. In doing the
original Int Rundown it can occur that it completes before all flows are
run.
EXAMPLE: The auditor runs Flow I on engrams on the revised Int RD, then
Flow 2, and suddenly gets a wide, persistent F/N and a dramatic resurge of
the pc. The TA goes into lower range and the pc is bright and smiling. Then
the auditor, if he's an idiot, proceeds to robotically run Flow 3 and Flow
0. The TA goes back up, the pc's chronic headache turns back on and the pc
is set up for an endless repair of Int.
I have seen this happen several times. The Int Rundown finished itself
and nobody noticed except the pc. This is probably the most flagrant cause
of Int repair and is peculiar to this rundown.
The way to handle this is to rehab the point of completion as best you
can and then run the recall version as given above and you will find that
it usually comes out straight. The best way to handle, of course, is to do
it right in the first place.
But if, added to any or all of the above, you get an Int Correction
List misassessed so that what's really wrong is missed and a falsely
reading item taken up, you wind up with a mess.
There is no excuse for overrunning the rundown, for Auditor's Code
breaks, poor metering or flubby Dianetic auditing.
On the other hand, interiorization, like any other condition connected
with engrams, may have many chains connected with it. Thus, the process of
day-to-day living can restimulate those chains and throw Int out.
A C/S, faced with the possibility of any or all of the above being
wrong could find himself staring into a maze. And he could err and order
correction list after correction list, ad infinitum.
The rule is:
THE CORRECT ACTION TO TAKE FIRST, IF SOMEONE IS HAVING TROUBLE WITH
INT, IS TO ALWAYS GET A THOROUGH FES DONE ON THE ORIGINAL INT RD ITSELF AND
ANY INT REPAIRS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE-BEFORE ANOTHER CORRECTION LIST IS
ORDERED.
Very often the answer to the puzzle then leaps out.
Get the errors corrected correctly. Any misassessed lists, misrun
Dianetic chains, code breaks-get it all cleaned up by an auditor who can
read a meter and run and repair Dianetics flublessly. Don't let any auditor
who isn't flubless on these points near an Int pc.
With the errors truly and standardly handled and out of the way, if Int
then continues to kick in, it's not another Int RD or another Int
Correction List, it's the END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN you use.
Run it to its EP and that will be the end of the trail of endless Int
repair.
If the C/S is in doubt about all this and gets into a mess trying to
repair chains, he can cut directly onto this repair rundown as above with
simply the Recall Processes, and he will get someplace.
AFTER AN INT RD OR END OF ENDLESS INT RUNDOWN HAS BEEN COMPLETED ON A
CASE AND DECLARED, THE NEXT ACTION MUST BE A C/S 53, ASSESSED AND HANDLED
TO F/NING LIST. THIS MUST BE DONE AS THE NEXT ACTION AND MAY NOT BE LEFT
NOT DONE. (The reason for this is that there are other things that can be
wrong with a case, all of which are covered on the C/S 53, and these too
must be handled.)
There is no reason now for any pc (or C/S) to continue to be plagued
with Int troubles .
We have here a rundown which is easily and simply done, which can be
run on a Dianetic C/ear, or a pre-OT who is NOT on OT III or ANYWHERE
between R6 Solo and OT III attest, on fragile pcs or weak or ill pcs, and
is a rescue from overrepair.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision as assisted by
LRH Tech Comps
LRH:LRHTC:dr.clb.jk
Copyright � 1978, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCOB 24.9.78RA
Rev. 21.2.79
Attachment No. 1
INT RUNDOWN TABLE
Yes No
A. IS THE READ ON INT A VALID READ? ____ ____
Is there any evidence of the pc having been run on Int due to a false
or protest read? ____ ____
Any evidence of the read being caused by a Mis-U word? ____ ____
(If 'yes' on above get 'False read?' and 'Protest?' cleaned up or the
Mis-U cleared and recheck the buttons on Section A of C/S 53 to find
out if Int is charged.)
B. HAS THE PC HAD A FULL INT RUNDOWN? ____ ____
(If 'no' or incomplete, it would have to be repaired and completed.
NOTE: The Int RD would NOT be run on a Dianetic Clear, Clear or OT as
they are not to be run on Dianetics in any form.)
C. HAS THE PC HAD AN INT RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST? ____ ____
(If not, and there is any evidence of errors or lack of expected
result, this should be done before continuing the Int RD or doing End
of Endless Int Rundown. And if the pc has had several Int Rundown
Correction Lists, realize that either the auditor can't make a list
read, or is only getting false reads.)
D. HAVE ANY R3R OR R3RA DIANETIC ERRORS ON THE INT RUNDOWN BEEN
CORRECTED WITH AN L3RF? ____ ____
(If not, get these repaired, as continuing the RD, or doing End of
Endless Int Rundown won't solve R3R or R3RA errors.)
E. IS THE PC A DIANETIC CLEAR OR ABOVE? ____ ____
Was the pc a Dianetic Clear when the Int RD was run on him by R3R or
R3RA ? ____ ____
(If 'yes' to either above, you must not run any Dianetics but if Int is
still out after repairing any errors the End of Endless Int Rundown can
be done on a Dianetic Clear. It can NOT be done between R6 Solo and OT
III attest.
If the pc was run on Dianetics on the Int RD after Dn C/ear, the first
action is to indicate the error of running Dianetics after Clear, and then
repair any reading Dianetic Int chain with an L3RF, taking care to handle
the reading lines by indication only, and not get into any running of
Dianetics. This action alone will often cure any Int trouble on a Dn Clear,
but if Int is still reading you can now handle it with the End of Endless
Int Rundown.)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II
C/Ses
Tech/Qual
Int Auditors
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Interiorization Rundown Series 13
PREASSESSMENT, AESPs AND INT
Although the newly revised Int Rundown uses New Era Dianetics R3RA
commands, with the assessed Int button as the running item, the rundown and
its repair do NOT include the use of New Era Dianetics preassessment (nor
any form of AESPs).
In Int you can only address Int. A preassessment addresses something
else.
Wins are sometimes reported on the use of preassessment on Int but it
is a dangerous and dicey procedure. It isn't really directly addressing
Int. That actually violates the law that when handling Int you run only
Int, nothing else.
Using preassessment, whereas you might have one win you'll have five
failures along with it. Sure, somebody got some wins on it but the next
five guys will cave right in and go over the cliff.
The apparency of the win is this: Int flattened and this went unnoticed
and then they were running an original item having to do with headaches or
some other symptom. This was then preassessed and the person was on the
line with R3RA which, of course, can be run after you've done an Int
Rundown.
So the apparency here is that the use of preassessment handled Int,
whereas Int probably had actually flattened first and then the person was
able to get gains from the preassessment and auditing that was done.
This could go in the opposite direction. For example, with Int still
unflat you go into preassessment, and you're not now addressing the subject
of Int itself. You are now into chains that are not Int chains, with the
Int chains themselves restimulated but not yet run, or not fully run. So it
is actually a violation of basic tech and it would very swiftly get into a
tangled mess.
The rule is: WHEN HANDLING INT YOU ADDRESS ONLY INT, NOTHING ELSE. AND
YOU DO NOT RUN PREASSESSMENT OR AESPs ON INT.
We have a new, simplified Int Rundown with which to handle it and an
extremely workable process in the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown which
resolves any persistent Int trouble.
R3RA and preassessment can be run in full by the book, exactly per the
New Era Dianetics Series, after Int handling has been completed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue III
Remimeo
AOs
NED Chkshts DIANETIC CLEAR
Tech/Qual
All C/Ses
All Auditors (Ref: HCOB 12 Sep 78 URGENT-IMPORTANT, DIANETICS
HCOs FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs)
Missions
(This bulletin revises the definition of "Dianetic Clear," page
113, Technical Dictionary, and the definition of "Keyed-Out Clear,"
page 221, Technical Dictionary. )
The state of Clear can be achieved on Dianetics.
I have now determined there is no such thing as Keyed-Out Clear. There
is only a Dianetic Clear and he is a Clear.
The state of Dianetic Clear means the pc has erased his Dianetic case
or mental image pictures; he has attained the ability to be at cause over
mental matter, energy, space and time on the First Dynamic.
When this happens the person is not run further on Dianetics. He can be
given Touch or Contact Assists (as can Scn Clears and OTs), and can be
given NED for OTs once he is OT III. He is not to be given any Dianetic
Auditing Assist nor any Dianetic auditing. (He can, of course, receive any
actions on the Assist Summary bulletin, excluding R3RA.)
The Dianetic Clear, on achieving this state, can be audited on
Scientology Grades 0-IV. He would not be run on the R3RA section of service
facs, however. On completing Grades 0-IV, he is not run on Power, R6EW or
the Clearing Course but goes onto OT I, after doing the Solo Auditor
Course.
Should a pc being audited on Dianetics originate that he has achieved
Dianetic Clear, or if a Dianetic auditor thinks this has occurred with his
pc, the folders must be routed to an org C/S who is Clear or above and who
can adjudicate.
(NOTE: No auditor or C/S must evaluate for a pc on this nor feed or
coax him to any cognition, which is a comm-evable offense. Clears are made
through auditing, not by feeding cognitions to pcs. This is important as
someone who has not made Clear will not make it on the OT levels.)
Field auditors and missions would route the folders of a pc believed to
be Dianetic Clear to the nearest org with a C/S who is Clear, for
adjudication and declare of the state.
Such submissions must be handled promptly, so there is no delay put on
any individual's progress up the Bridge.
Once declared, the pc folders must be clearly marked "DIANETIC CLEAR."
The pc may then be C/Sed to receive Scientology auditing, per the above.
The pc is not, however, given any further Dianetic auditing.
LRH:dr L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue I
Remimeo
HGC Auditors
Scn Chkshts
Cl VIII
Cl IV Grad
Interiorization Rundown Series 5
QUAD COMMANDS FOR INT BUTTONS
(Cancels BTB 30 Dec 71 IMPORTANT INTERIORIZATION
RUNDOWN COMMANDS)
Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2
EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA,
THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN
REVISED
HCOB 24 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 4
URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF
ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN
NOTE: IN USING THESE COMMANDS (R3RA AND RECALLS) DO NOT EVER RUN A PC
ON FLOW ZERO FOR THE FIRST TIME ON INT. HANDLING INT BY ANY METHOD
IS NOT THE TIME TO INTRODUCE A FLOW ZERO ON A PC. A TRIPLE PC CAN
BE QUADED UP AFTER INT HANDLING IS COMPLETE, BUT IT IS NEVER DONE
ON INT HANDLING OR INT REPAIR.
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN REVISED
The following are the R3RA Quad Flows commands for each of the Int
buttons on the Interiorization Rundown Revised.
1. GO IN/WENT IN:
F1: Locate a time when you went in.
F2: Locate a time when you caused another to go in.
F3: Locate a time when others caused others to go in.
F0: Locate a time when you caused yourself to go in.
2. PUT IN:
F1: Locate a time when you were put in something.
F2: Locate a time when you put another in something.
F3: Locate a time when others put others in something.
F0: Locate a time when you put yourself in something.
3. INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING:
F1: Locate a time when you interiorized into something.
F2: Locate a time when you interiorized another into something.
F3: Locate a time when others interiorized others into something.
F0: Locate a time when you interiorized yourself into something.
4. WANT TO GO IN:
F1: Locate a time when you wanted to go into something.
F2: Locate a time when you caused another to want to go into
something
F3: Locate a time when others caused others to want to go into
something
F0: Locate a time when you caused yourself to want to go into
something
5. CAN'T GET IN:
F1: Locate a time when you couldn't get in.
F2: Locate a time when you caused another to be unable to get in.
F3: Locate a time when others caused others to be unable to get in.
F0: Locate a time when you caused yourself to be unable to get in.
6. KICKED OUT OF SPACES:
F1: Locate a time when you were kicked out of spaces.
F2: Locate a time when you kicked another out of spaces.
F3: Locate a time when others kicked others out of spaces.
F0: Locate a time when you caused yourself to be kicked out of
spaces.
7. CAN'T GO IN:
F1: Locate a time when you couldn't go in.
F2: Locate a time when you caused another to be unable to go in.
F3: Locate a time when others caused others to be unable to go in.
F0: Locate a time when you caused yourself to be unable to go in.
8. BEING TRAPPED:
F1: Locate a time when you were being trapped.
F2: Locate a time when you were trapping another.
F3: Locate a time when others were trapping others.
F0: Locate a time when you were trapping yourself.
9. FORCED IN:
F1: Locate a time when you were forced in.
F2: Locate a time when you forced another in.
F3: Locate a time when others forced others in.
F0: Locate a time when you forced yourself in.
10. PULLED IN:
F1: Locate a time when you were pulled in.
F2: Locate a time when you pulled another in.
F3: Locate a time when others pulled others in.
F0: Locate a time when you pulled yourself in.
Each flow must be taken to the basic and the full New Era Dianetic EP:
F/N, postulate off (postulate off = erasure) and VGIs. (Ref: HCOB 26 Jun
78RA II, New Era Dianetics Series 6RA, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS.)
THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN
The following are the Recall Quad Flows commands for each of the Int
buttons on the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown.
1. GO IN/WENT IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you went in.
RF 2: Recall a time when you caused another to go in.
RF 3: Recall a time when others caused others to go in.
RF 0: Recall a time when you caused yourself to go in.
2. PUT IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you were put in something.
RF 2: Recall a time when you put another in something.
RF 3: Recall a time when others put others in something.
RF 0: Recall a time when you put yourself in something.
3. INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING:
RF 1: Recall a time when you interiorized into something.
RF 2: Recall a time when you interiorized another into something.
RF 3: Recall a time when others interiorized others into something.
RF 0: Recall a time when you interiorized yourself into something.
4. WANT TO GO IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you wanted to go into something.
RF 2: Recall a time when you caused another to want to go into
something.
RF 3: Recall a time when others caused others to want to go into
something
RF 0: Recall a time when you caused yourself to want to go into
something.
5. CAN'T GET IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you couldn't get in.
RF 2: Recall a time when you caused another to be unable to get in.
RF 3: Recall a time when others caused others to be unable to get in.
RF 0: Recall a time when you caused yourself to be unable to get in.
6. KICKED OUT OF SPACES:
RF 1: Recall a time when you were kicked out of spaces.
RF 2: Recall a time when you kicked another out of spaces.
RF 3: Recall a time when others kicked others out of spaces.
RF 0: Recall a time when you caused yourself to be kicked out of
spaces.
7. CAN'T GO IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you couldn't go in.
RF 2: Recall a time when you caused another to be unable to go in.
RF 3: Recall a time when others caused others to be unable to go in.
RF 0: Recall a time when you caused yourself to be unable to go in.
8. BEING TRAPPED:
RF 1: Recall a time when you were being trapped.
RF 2: Recall a time when you were trapping another.
RF 3: Recall a time when others were trapping others.
RF 0: Recall a time when you were trapping yourself.
9. FORCED IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you were forced in.
RF 2: Recall a time when you forced another in.
RF 3: Recall a time when others forced others in.
RF 0: Recall a time when you forced yourself in.
10. PULLED IN:
RF 1: Recall a time when you were pulled in.
RF 2: Recall a time when you pulled another in.
RF 3: Recall a time when others pulled others in.
RF 0: Recall a time when you pulled yourself in.
Each Recall Flow must be taken to F/N, VGIs.
(Ref: HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT, THE END OF
ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1978
Remimeo Issue II
HGC Auditors
Class VIII (Cancels BTB 6 Jan 71R, same title)
Cl IV Grad
C/Ses
Tech Secs Interiorization Rundown Series 14
Qual Secs
Supervisors
STARRATE CHECKOUTS FOR
INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2, EXTERIORIZATION & HIGH
TA, THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN
REVISED
HCOB 25 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 5, QUAD COMMANDS FOR
INT BUTTONS
HCOB 24 Sep 78 I Int RD Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT
THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR
RUNDOWN
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA, ROUTINE
3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 10 Sep 78 NED HIGH CRIME)
________
INT must be run flawlessly.
It is to be done by a Class IV auditor, skilled in the materials of
that level, who is also certificate trained on New Era Dianetics and the
running of R3RA.
BECAUSE IT IS MANDATORY THAT:
1. COMMANDS OF THE INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN BE CLEARED
EXCELLENTLY FOR THE PC'S UNDERSTANDING,
2. THE GOING EARLIER COMMAND BE GIVEN FULLY WITH THE ITEM,
3. THE AUDITOR UNDERSTAND FULLY THE THEORY AND COMMANDS HE IS
RUNNING.
ALL AUDITORS AND THE C/S OF INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWNS MUST STARRATE WITH
CLAY DEMOS ON THE THEORY AND COMMANDS OF THE INT RD.
ALL AUDITORS MUST HAVE AN "OKAY TO AUDIT INT RUNDOWN" FROM THE DIR OF
VALIDITY OR THE QUAL SEC BEFORE THEY MAY DO SO.
No auditor may audit a pc on the Interiorization Rundown unless he has
passed tough starrate checkouts and excellent clay demos on the materials
below, and has an "Okay to Audit Int RD" chit from Qual.
When he has done so, he is qualified and will be able to deliver an
Interiorization Rundown to his pc with the exceptional results for which
this rundown was intended.
STARRATE CHECKOUTS FOR "OKAY TO AUDIT INT RD"
Auditor's Name: Org:_________________
I attest:
a) I am a Senior Class IV or Class IV Graduate Auditor.
b) I am certificate trained on the New Era Dianetics Course and
the running of R3RA.
Auditor's Attest: Date:_________________
1. The following checkouts are to be done starrate to a pass from the
Supervisor or Interne Supervisor.
1. CLAY DEMO:
a) Lock k) Interiorization
(as went in)
b) Secondary
l) The picture
c) Engram erasing
d) Chain m) F/N
e) Picture n) Cognition
f) Solid o) Erasure
g) Erasing p) Postulate
h) Caused q) Postulate off
= erasure
i) Exteriorization
j) Interiorization
(as being in)
2. CLAY DEMO: (per HCOB 4 Jan 71 R)
a) Commands for running Int by R3RA, including the going earlier
and earlier beginning commands.
3. CLAY DEMO: (per HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4)
a) The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown procedure and commands.
This auditor has done excellent clay demos on all of the above.
SUPERVISOR/INTERNE SUPERVISOR: DATE:_________
4. STARRATE:
a) HCOB 4 Jan 71R, Int RD Series 2, EXT AND HIGH TA, THE INT RD
REVISED.
b) HCOB 26 Jun 78RA, NED Series 6RA, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING
BY CHAINS.
c) HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4, URGENT IMPORTANT END OF
ENDLESS INT REPAIR RD.
This auditor has passed tough Narrate checkouts on the above HCOBs.
SUPER/INTERNE SUPER: DATE: ________
5. This auditor knows his R3RA and Int procedure cold and can apply it.
SUPER/INTERNE SUPER: DATE: ________
6. This auditor has excellent TRs.
SUPER/INTERNE SUPER: DATE: ________
II. I attest this auditor has been issued an "OKAY TO AUDIT INT RD" chit.
DIR VALIDITY/QUAL SEC: DATE: ________
(Route this form to Course Admin for student's folder.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk/dr
Copyright � 1971, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor. East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1978
FESers
All Auditors
All C/Ses
FESING OF FOLDERS
AND FULL FLOW TABLES
An FES should contain the name of the auditor and name of the C/S, per
existing issues.
It now becomes imperative that the name of the auditor be clearly noted
on the FFT (Full Flow Table) as well as the FES. In making up FFTs on any
Dianetic or NED auditing clearly note the auditor's name, as well as the
date and item run by that auditor. Existing FFTs do not need to be redone-
just print in the name of the auditor, in different coloured ink (to make
it very visible) against the items run by that auditor.
On new FFTs add a column on left side of sheet for auditor's name.
PC's NAME ______________________
[pic]
Some cases have had unreading items, wrong items, run on them,
sometimes the auditor changed the pc's item, or even just decided what to
run on a pc. These are grave and can have serious consequences on a case.
In order to fully handle such a situation it is imperative that all the
data above is available to a C/S or auditor.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dm.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
NED Checksheet
NED RULE
A NEW ERA DIANETICS AUDITOR MUST UNDERSTAND THE FUNCTION AND PURPOSE OF
EACH OF THE R3RA COMMANDS IN A DIANETIC SESSION .
A Dianetic session given in the absence of an understanding of the
basic laws of the time track and how the R3RA commands handle and control
the time track is a chancy proposition.
You will not have confidence in yourself as an auditor of New Era
Dianetics nor get uniformly good results with R3RA until you know this. No
rote procedure, L3RF, TR4, or any remedy or solution can take the place of
such an understanding.
Every New Era Dianetics auditor is to study the references and demo out
what each R3RA command does (showing how it affects the pc and the bank) to
a full understanding.
The following are your references:
Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health
Dianetics: The Original Thesis
HCOB 15 May 63 The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains
Bulletin I
HCOB 8 Jun 63R The Time Track and Engram Running by Chains
Bulletin II
HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA
Routine 3RA Engram Running by Chains
HCOB 27 Jan 74 Dianetic R3R Commands Have Background Data.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mdf
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
Auditors
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
Tech/Qual
Interiorization Rundown Series 1
INTERIORIZATION HANDLING SIMPLIFIED
(Ref: HCOB 4 Jan 71R Int RD Series 2, Exteriorization and High
TA,
The Interiorization Rundown Revised
HCOB 24 Sep 781 Int RD Series 4, Urgent-Important,
The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown.)
Exteriorization
Exteriorization is defined as the act of moving out of the body with or
without full perception.
It is the fact of this act which proves that the individual is not a
body but an individual. This discovery in 1952 proved beyond any
question the existence of a thetan, that the individual was a thetan,
not a body, and disproved that Man was an animal, and proved that he
was a spiritual being, timeless and deathless.
_________
The issues on exteriorization and interiorization and the handling of
out-Int have now been collected into the Interiorization Rundown Series.
We have had the remedy for out-Int, the Interiorization Rundown, for
some years now, but we have also had pcs who ran into the need for
excessive repair of the remedy itself. Much of this need for repair has
stemmed from auditor errors in running or repairing Int, and these have
been enumerated on other bulletins.
Whatever the reasons for repair, a simple, effective method of
repairing Int was needed. This need has now been filled with the release of
the new End of Endless Int Repair Rundown.
With the research that was done to develop this repair rundown which
uses Recalls, I have also had the opportunity to reevaluate the original
Int Rundown itself. The result is a newly revised Int Rundown.
So we have two very effective new tools for handling Int:
1. A simplified Interiorization Rundown
2. The End of Endless Int Repair Rundown, which handles Int repair
smoothly and terminatedly by a special method of assessment and
running it on Recall flows.
The full steps of both of these rundowns are included in issues in the
Interiorization Rundown Series.
NOTE: Per HCOB 12 Sep 78, "Urgent Important, Dianetics Forbidden on Clears
and OTs," Dianetic Clears, Scn Clears and OTs are not to be audited on the
Int Rundown as it uses Dianetics. They may be run on The End of Endless Int
Repair RD (HCOB 24 Sep 78 I, Int RD Series 4), as it runs Int on Recalls.
Additionally, the basics on exteriorization and interiorization are
covered quite fully in the Int RD Series, particularly in HCOB 4 Jan 71R,
Exteriorization and High TA, The Interiorization Rundown Revised.
Any auditor who is going to go near an Int Rundown or an Int repair
action must know those fundamentals cold.
He must understand that it is the first of a chain or the first part of
an experience or a first experience (basic on the chain of incidents) that
has to be run for the chain or incident to erase. In other words, he must
understand the principle of getting the earlier beginning to an incident or
an earlier incident in order to erase a chains as in R3RA.
He must understand that if one is IN something, he must have gotten
into it. And that, therefore, the beginning of an exteriorization is an
interiorization.
The full theory on this also is covered in the above HCOB 4 Jan 71R,
which the auditor should be fully familiar with.
There is some further data which you should have, on the subject of Int
and flows.
Basically, Int is a compound of stuck flows and prior incidents. There
is a stuck flow of obsessively going in. In most of the pc's Int engrams
you've got an operating trigger that puts him into them. The earlier
beginning is always "in." These must be audited out, blown, before you're
through with Int.
The way this trigger works is, for example: A pc may blow out of his
head with F/N, VGIs on Tuesday. But he has not erased the basic on Int. He
went out on a "reaction flow" on Tuesday. On Friday he comes in with his TA
at 5. What has happened is the flow has retriggered. He's now blown back in
on a "re-reaction flow." Any regular auditing and he will plow in deeper.
So you've got to handle his Int terminatedly.
Prior to now, an Int Rundown has been done by clearing and then
assessing the Int buttons "went in" and "go in." If one of them read the
Int button was first run on Recall Triple or Quad Flows, next on
Secondaries Triple or Quad Flows, and then on Engrams Triple or Quad Flows.
This handled Int for many, many pcs. But it is probable that one reason we
also got so many Int repairs was that in many of these repair cases the pc
never ran any basic. Beginning the Int Rundown with Recalls with the stuck
flow of "going in" still in operation you could get a key-out, key-in, key-
out, key-in repeatedly and not get to the basic.
We had an exteriorization command in the early years which was "Try not
to be three feet back of your head," and it exteriorized people. But all
that did was unstick the flow and trigger the person out of his head.
You're likely to get the same result if you run Int by Recall first crack.
You give the command "Recall a time...." and boom, he's out. But he hasn't
run the basic on Int.
So if you entered an Int Rundown on a Recall basis you could get some
of that mechanism cutting in. And you could get repetitive Int, with the
engrams he didn't run out keying in.
There is another phenomenon that can occur. Time itself can be a stuck
flow.
You get a certain number of pcs who can't move back on the time track
more than minutes. They get stuck on the stuck flow of time. On Recall
commands such a pc may F/N very quickly. (Or even on an R3RA command,
"Locate a time when you went in."
he may run shallow, he may run only locks and F/N quickly.) Then suddenly
he hits the skids and goes hurtling backtrack. The flow is reversed and he
doesn't fire out of his head, he fires backwards on the time track, on a
restim. And you'll have out-Int repeating itself all over again. That's the
rest of the mechanism.
Addressed in R3RA engram auditing properly done, always getting the
earlier beginning and/or the earlier incident, these chains of incidents on
the stuck flow of going in can be audited out in an orderly fashion on the
majority of pcs. You erase the engrams and you dissolve the obsessive stuck
flow of going in, and you have the EP of Int.
Or, at some point in the engram auditing the flow gets unstuck enough
to heave into reverse, it heaves in the opposite direction and it erases
itself and the whole package blows. That, too, is an EP for Int which must
not be ignored by the auditor. (See HCOB 4 Jan 71R.)
Thereafter, the pc will usually have no more trouble or concern with
Int.
So we are safer entering the Int Rundown by running engrams to begin
with, and running only engrams on that rundown, and that is how the revised
Int Rundown has now been set up. We had better run the engram chains and
their basics out first and then, if repair is needed, repair them with
Recalls, using the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown.
MORE ON RECALLS
Entering Int with Recalls has its liabilities, as described above. But
there are also definite advantages in having Recalls as a tool to use, as
necessary, in running Int on some cases.
You are going to encounter some few isolated instances where the pc
can't run engrams for one reason or another. Such pcs can then be audited
by the Recall method as given in the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown,
using the rundown not as a repair but as a process. Dianetic Clears, Scn
Clears and OTs can be handled on out-Int with this method. It can also be
used to relieve out-Int on weak or ill pcs until they are up to running
engrams.
It is not a fast method. Using the Recall system (per End of Endless
Int Repair RD) to run out-Int, can go on and on. In time though, by taking
the pc up on a gradient, you can eventually get him to a point where he is
actually as-ising engrams, blowing them by inspection. The revised Int
Rundown is by far the swifter route for handling a pc initially on out-Int.
However, the use of Recalls is ideal in the handling of repair of Int,
when it is necessary after an Int Rundown has been done. The End of Endless
Int Repair Rundown gives the exact method for assessment of the Int buttons
and flows and running these on Recalls as a repair action. And here we get
a smooth run on the Recall flows and the resolving of any Int troubles.
Thus, from this research we get a new, simplified version of the Int
Rundown and an invaluable process for any Int repair.
Further issues in the Int Rundown Series cover these and other
technical data relating to Int.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 OCTOBER 1978
Class IV Grad
Chksht (Cancels and replaces HCOB 21 Dec 75R
Class VI Repair List for Prepared Lists.)
Checksheet
C/Ses
REPAIR CORRECTION LIST
Use this list to clean up bypassed charge on improperly done or
unnecessary prepared lists or repair actions. This list is done when a pc
protests a prepared list or repair action, when BIs are present on the
subject of repair or prepared lists or when improper past repair or use of
correction lists reads on a correction list.
Assess this list Method 5 and handle all reads. The EP of this list is
charge off the subject of repair and prepared lists and the pc happy about
being audited. This list can, if necessary, be reassessed and taken to an
F/Ning assessment.
The words "prepared list," "repair" and all other words on this list
should be fully cleared with the pc before assessing this list on him.
However, if the pc is very upset and the words have not yet been cleared,
assess the list to handle the charge and check with the pc for any MUs on
the assessment. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS)
1. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING? ________
If the pc has never had an Int RD, do an Int RD per HCOB 4 Jan 71R
Int RD Series 2 EXTERIORIZATION AND HIGH TA THE INT RD REVISED if you
have checked out on the Int Series and are a NED auditor.
If the pc has had an Int RD, do an Int RD Correction List Revised
(HCOB 29 Oct 71 RA) or end off for C/S instructions to do an End of
Endless Int Repair RD per HCOB 24 Sep 78 I URGENT IMPORTANT END OF
ENDLESS INT REPAIR RD.
2. HAS YOUR INT RD BEEN MESSED UP? ________
Do an Int RD Correction List or end off for C/S instructions to do
the End of Endless Int Repair RD.
3. DO YOU HAVE AN OUT-LIST? ________
L4BRA.
4. HAVE YOU HAD TOO MANY PREPARED LISTS DONE ON YOU? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or Date/Locate the first successful
prepared list.
5. HAVE YOU HAD UNNECESSARY REPAIRS? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or Date/Locate the first valid repair.
6. HAS AN AUDITOR MISSED A READ? ________
Get what, itsa E/S itsa to F/N, or handle as needed.
7. DID YOU THINK SOMETHING SHOULD HAVE READ WHEN IT DIDN'T?
________
Get what, itsa E/S itsa to F/N, or handle as needed.
8. HAS AN ITEM NOT READ WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE? ________
Get what, itsa E/S itsa to F/N, or handle as needed.
9. HAS THERE BEEN A FALSE READ? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
10. WERE YOU TOLD SOMETHING READ WHEN YOU DIDN'T SEE HOW IT COULD HAVE?
________
Get what, indicate it was a false read. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
11. DID THE AUDITOR TAKE UP AN ITEM WITH NO CHARGE ON IT? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
12. WERE YOU GIVEN A PREPARED LIST TO HANDLE HIGH TA WHEN YOUR TA WASN'T
HIGH? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
13. WERE YOU GIVEN A PREPARED LIST TO HANDLE LOW TA WHEN YOUR TA WASN'T
LOW? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
14. HAS THERE BEEN A TIME WHEN YOU DIDN'T WANT TO DO A PREPARED LIST AND
THE AUDITOR DID ONE ANYWAY? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
15. HAS THERE BEEN A TIME WHEN YOU DIDN'T WANT TO GET A REPAIR ACTION AND
YOU WERE GIVEN ONE ANYWAY? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
16. WHILE BEING AUDITED ON A PREPARED LIST DID YOU JUST WANT TO GET ON
WITH IT? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
17. DID YOU TELL THE AUDITOR SOMETHING WAS HANDLED JUST TO BE DONE WITH
IT? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N. Note for C/S.
18. HAS OVERREPAIR KEPT YOU FROM GOING UP THE GRADE CHART? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
19. HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD A REPAIR ACTION WOULD HANDLE YOUR CASE WHEN IT
DIDN'T? ________
Indicate. 2WC to F/N or 2WC for data.
20. HAS AN AUDITOR MISASSESSED A PREPARED LIST ON YOU? ________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
21. WHEN YOU HAD A PREPARED LIST DONE, DID IT FAIL TO HANDLE THE BYPASSED
CHARGE? ________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
22. DID A REPAIR ACTION FAIL TO HANDLE WHAT WAS REALLY WRONG?
________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
23. HAVE YOU BEEN ASSESSED BY AN AUDITOR WITH BAD TRs? ________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
24. HAS AN AUDITOR TOLD YOU YOU HAD AN F/N WHEN YOU KNEW YOU
DIDN'T? ________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
25. DID AN AUDITOR EVER INDICATE AN ASSESSMENT WAS F/NING WHEN YOU KNEW
IT WASN'T? ________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
26. WERE YOU ASKED TO DECLARE A CYCLE YOU FELT WASN'T COMPLETE?
________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
27. DID YOU EVER FEEL A PREPARED LIST SHOULD HAVE F/NED ON AN ASSESSMENT
WHEN IT DIDN'T? ________
Indicate. Rehab the EP or Date/Locate the point.
28. ON A REPAIR ACTION, WERE YOU PREVENTED FROM ATTESTING? ________
Indicate. Date/Locate the EP of the repair.
29. HAS YOUR REPAIR BEEN REPAIRED OFTEN? ________
Indicate. Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or Date/Locate the first successful
repair.
30. HAS AN F/N BEEN MISSED? ________
Indicate. Rehab it.
31. HAS A WIN BEEN BYPASSED? ________
Indicate. Rehab.
32. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN? ________
Get what. Rehab it.
33. IS THERE SOME OTHER BYPASSED CHARGE? ________
Find what and handle.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mm.dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 OCTOBER 1978
Issue II
C/Ses
Tech/Qual
Class IV Grad
Interiorization Rundown Series 16
C/S Series 102
C/S CHECKLIST OF INT ERRORS
There are two major errors that occur most frequently on Int handling
which a C/S must be on the alert for:
1. DOING OR RUNNING ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE AN INT RUNDOWN WHEN ONE
IS NEEDED.
2. OVERRUNNING THE INT RUNDOWN.
By far the commonest error is number one above. It happens most often
at the very beginning of a session on Int itself, by the auditor engaging
in two-way comm or ruds or a belabored and overcomplicated clearing of
commands, or some other action than getting right onto the running of Int.
This is flagrant. When I was C/Sing, it is what I kept running into-the
auditor doing all kinds of preliminary steps before starting Int. It boils
down to auditing over out-Int, and it can't be done.
You'll get the auditor who says, "But all I did was ask him how he was
feeling." That's enough. That's two-way comm, and you can't run anything
else but Int when Int is out, and that includes two-way comm. You don't ask
the pc how he feels about anything. You just start the Int Rundown.
So that's the first major error to watch for: somebody trying to run
something else before the Int Rundown itself.
The second is OVERRUN. Pc has a big cognition, a big win, TA blowdown,
and the auditor misses it, goes right on past it and continues auditing. Or
the pc exteriorizes and the auditor continues past exterior.
There is vital data on the end phenomena of Int on HCOB 4 Jan 71R, Int
RD Series 2, and both C/S and auditor MUST have this data and know and be
able to recognize the EP of Int when it occurs. Otherwise it will really
mess up a case.
Those are the two major violations a C/S (and an auditor) must not
permit in the running of Int if it is to be successful.
Because they are the most major errors they have been included first on
the checklist below.
C/S CHECKLIST FOR DETECTING ERRORS ON INT:
The following is a checklist to be used in the C/Sing of Int. The C/S
checks a bogged session or any session on Int, against this list to detect
the exact cause of the trouble, or an error that could be the source of
future trouble in ensuing sessions.
1. Doing or running anything else before an Int Rundown when one
is needed. (Includes ruds, 2-way comm, L1C, anything.)
2. Auditing over out-Int.
3. Overrunning the Int Rundown.
4. Auditing past exterior.
5. Overdoing the clearing steps preceding the actual rundown.
6. Running an Int button that only read on an MU or false read. (Failure
to clear an Int button before running it.)
7. Clearing all of the Int buttons before assessment, instead of
clearing only the button with the largest valid read.
8. Failure to use Suppress, Invalidate, and Misunderstood on an
unreading Int button list.
9. Misassessment of the Int button list.
10. Doing an Int Rundown when none of the buttons have read. (Constitutes
running an unreading item.)
11. Auditor can't get reads or make a list read.
12. Not taking the Int Rundown to its full EP.
13. Not understanding the theory of Int and R3RA, and WHY one goes
earlier or asks for an earlier beginning to the incident.
14. Running the concept of "was in" or "stuck in" instead of the concept
of "moving in" or "going in" (on whatever the reading Int button is).
15. Not repeating the actual button for the chain when asking for an
earlier incident. (Not knowing R3RA commands.)
16. Not completing a chain to full Dianetic EP.
17. Not completing any one flow on an Int button in one session; thus
ending a session on an unflat flow.
18. Introducing Flow 0 to a pc for the first time on Int Rundown or Int
repair. (I.e. running a Triple pc on Quad Flows.)
19. Auditing over an earlier Dianetic error.
20. Auditing the rundown "to exteriorize" the pc.
21. Using preassessment or AESPs on Int.
22. Misassessing or incorrectly handling the Int Correction List.
23. Overcorrecting the Int Rundown.
24. Running Dianetics on a Dianetic Clear, Scn Clear or OT.
25. And, on the part of the C/S, attempting to correct a botched Int
Rundown without a full FES of the Int RD or any Int repair being done
first.
___________
The above points are all covered fully in the Int Rundown Series. Cases
that are not running well on Int will be found to have had one or more of
these errors committed on them.
Using the above list to spot and prevent Int errors will make the C/S's
job lighter and give both auditor and pc a smoother run on Int.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 OCTOBER 1978
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Class VI
Checksheet
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
& above
Auditors
C/S SERIES 53,
USE OF
The C/S Series 53 Short Form is the basic prepared list used by
auditors to get a TA up or down into normal range or to correct case
outnesses. It contains every element that could be wrong with the mind. It
is written the way it is because we just want to know if a subject reads in
the pc's mind, and if so you handle it to F/N.
The C/S Series 53 Long Form is exactly the same as the short form
except that it puts the items into full questions so that a less educated
pc can understand what is being asked. The questions actually limit its use
a bit, but are needed with uneducated pcs. The limit comes about through
making the questions a bit too specific whereas the general questions of
the short form don't say to what they apply so are less limited.
Both the short form and the long form are assessed Method 5. (This
means going down the list, calling off the items or questions to the pc,
watching the meter and marking any tick, small fall, fall, long fall, long
fall blowdown (to what TA). Do not take up instant F/Ns. You can program
instant F/Ns, but not off a C/S 53.
The order the reads must be taken up is built into the list itself. You
can't audit a case on anything if Int is out. Auditing must be very limited
if a list is out. If you audit over an ARC break very long the pc will go
into a sad effect. If you audit over a problem the pc won't make case gain.
If you audit over a withhold the pc will get mad at you. If you look at
this and compare it to the C/S 53 you will see that the list itself is
built on a declining order of urgency. It is true of the remaining items on
the list.
There are two ways of using a C/S 53. The first is to simply assess it
and indicate the largest read. This is a sort of brushoff but is very
useful in handling blown students or pcs, will get off charge and get them
back into the org or more comfortable. The other way is its proper use in
session. You simply start at the first read and handle it. Go to the next
read and handle it, etc. Note that this is at variance with the general
handling of prepared lists where you simply take the largest read and next
largest read and so forth.
That an item reads, with the exception of Int, does not mean you have
to do a full rundown at that point. You just have to F/N it. If further
actions are needed to take an item to full handling, get it onto the pc's
Advance Program. (This includes drug handling, etc. but not, as I've said,
Int. If Int reads, you handle it fully because no auditing can take place
over out-Int. If he has already had a full Int Rd you would run the End of
Endless Int Repair Rundown. If he or she is already Clear or OT and has not
had an Int RD you would run the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown as the
primary action.)
The object of the C/S 53 is to key out things that are bothering the pc
and get anything you found on the list to an F/N. That something read
(except Int) does not mean the auditor doing the C/S 53 must at once run up
110 hours of auditing before he can finish the C/S 53 to an F/Ning list.
Auditors who don't realize this can get stuck in on a C/S 53 mostly because
they misconceive a C/S 53 to be wholly a case analysis list.
Its primary purpose is to get the case rolling so you can do something else
that is scheduled on the pc's program. Because it can be made to serve as a
case analysis and is sometimes called for by a C/S to help him do a repair
or advance program or to confirm it, sometimes misleads the auditor into
believing he is not supposed to F/N the list.
I have even used a C/S 53 in a D of P interview when the pc wasn't
speaking up. Then by getting the reads I could program the pc and unless it
was Int reading I would conclude the interview simply by indicating the
largest read which would get me my F/N and let the pc go away happy while
we really got to work on him in the C/S department.
So the C/S 53 is a child of many uses as it does after all, contain all
the elements known to us that bring about case foul-ups.
CLEARS AND OTS
Sections D and E of the C/S 53 can be assessed on Clears and OTs and
Dianetic Clears. However do NOT engage in any activity that brings about
further engram running. The correct way to handle Clears and OTs if you get
a read in Section D is indicate and let him tell you about it if he wishes,
to get an F/N. On Section E you can do an L3RF but you must not do more
than indicate the item. You must NOT engage in engram running. (Ref: HCOB
12 Sep 78, DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs)
You realize of course that LSD and some other drugs can apparently stay
in the physiological body and release themselves now and then. If a Clear,
OT or Dianetic Clear got a read on Section D (drugs, etc.) and it didn't
clear up easily you would program the person for a Sweat Program and even
Objectives. You would not however, do any engram running on the drugs. Even
Recalls might be a bit dicey. The Sweat Program and Objectives would
however handle, if you got into the goofy situation of heavy or persistent
Section D reads on a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear. It would not be very
usual but you better know about it.
On Section E (engrams and masses, etc.) if you got reads on a Clear, OT
or Dianetic Clear you could indicate them and if they didn't clear to F/N
you could do an L3RF, remembering that the instructions on the L3RF
handlings do not apply. Your actions as an auditor would simply be to
indicate the read and you would probably get your F/N, providing of course
your read wasn't false. The way to program a persistent read on this would
be to get the person up to OT I, II and III fast. And then program NED for
OTs. But whatever you do don't try to run these reads out with Dianetics.
The rest of the C/S 53 (except D and E as above) is quite valid on
Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears as it is mostly concerned with think,
environment and practices.
F/Ning A C/S 53
Unless you run into the necessity to do an Int handling or you goof or
get false reads you can F/N a whole C/S 53 rather rapidly.
C/S 53 TO F/Ning LIST
Getting a C/S 53 to an F/Ning list is done by Method 5ing it, handling
any Int RD necessary and handling the rest of the items, each to F/N.
You then Method 5 the whole C/S 53 again. You may pick up an additional
read or two. You F/N these. Hopefully, if Int is now handled properly, if
it did read in the first place, it won't read again. But if it does, you
have the End of Endless Int Repair
RD which if done already may not have been carried to EP so you simply get
it carried to EP, which is an F/Ning Int button list.
You then Method 5 the C/S 53 again. You will probably get an F/Ning
assessment throughout. If you don't you simply Method 5 it again.
The eventual EP of getting a prepared list to F/N will occur unless the
meter, the auditor's metering or TRs, or use of the list are badly out. The
thing to do in that event is to get another auditor or get liberally
crammed or retreaded, as frankly, F/Ning a C/S 53 is a piece of cake.
F/Ning a C/S 53 to F/Ning list is relatively easy to do and can produce
a remarkable resurgence of case. It's an easy and simple way to do a set-up
for a major rundown.
BUG
Some pcs, particularly those who have a false TA have gotten so bugged
by C/S 53s being done on them that when they see an auditor reach for one,
they react adversely.
The way to handle this is 2WC the C/S 53 itself, E/S, taking the F/Ns
and ignore ing the TA position and then do a full false TA handling on the
pc per HCOB 21 Jan 77RA, FALSE TA CHECKLIST.
In essence what you have discovered is the biggest reading item of all
without even looking at your meter.
No further repair is needed than the above as a C/S 53 will now work
like a clock and can be done smoothly and correctly. It will even pick up
the latent charge of "Endless C/S 53s" if you do the above.
The C/S 53 Series is a wonderful tool and like any tool can be well
handled or mishandled.
Part of its proper use is understanding exactly what it is and handling
it with a good meter, good metering, and good TRs.
There is no other document in history that has rounded up so completely
the factors which can be wrong with the mind. And also put it, in its short
form, on one sheet of paper.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 OCTOBER 1978
Remimeo
Qual Divs
Tech Divs
KOTs
All Supervisors
HCOs
Student Hat FB
Action Bu Hat
FOLOs
COURSES-THEIR IDEAL SCENE
(REFERENCES:
HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
Reiss. 15.6.70. Reiss. 28.1.73
HCO PL 7 May 69 II STUDENTS GUIDE TO ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR
HCO PL 16 Apr 65 THE "HIDDEN DATA LINE"
HCO PL 24 Oct 68 SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW, RUNNING THE CLASS
HCO PL 16 Mar 71R WHAT IS A COURSE?)
There are two ways a course can be run. It can be in-ethics or out-
ethics.
An in-ethics course means that HCOBs are applied, verbal data doesn't
exist whatsoever, schedules are strictly adhered to, musters are held, the
Supervisor applies all the study tech, etc.
An out-ethics course would be anything less and sometimes becomes so
obviously out-ethics that you see students goofing around on course, late
arrivals for roll call, students taking cigarette breaks whenever they feel
like it, verbal data running rampant, and a Course Supervisor that does
nothing but stand around.
There's such a thing as group agreement and if a new student walks into
an outethics course room, he will tend to go into agreement with it and
join in.
There's no in-between point. A course (or any activity for that matter)
cannot be run semi-standardly or with "pretty much in-ethics." It must be
run with totally standard tech and in-ethics. If this is not the case
you'll get a gradually lowered ethics level, admin will go out and standard
tech slips down to "some of the tech being applied when we can."
When a student or Supervisor goes into a course room and sees things
that are out-ethics or nonstandard or "not the way Ron says they should be"
and doesn't do something effective to handle the scene then he himself will
become part of it; he goes into agreement with it and will actually
contribute to the out-ethics.
This situation is a widespread thing in our society today. It's not
limited to our course rooms. You see it in marriages. It has become an
acceptable thing to get divorced, create broken homes, cheat on your
spouse. In the world of big business you're told to swindle Mr. X before he
swindles you. This is group agreement. It is agreed upon out-ethics.
Now, if a course room is run like this you'll get auditors who won't
keep auditing appointments, misapply tech, fail to handle their pcs'
ethics, give and accept verbal data, have nonstandard admin, etc., etc. You
will also train executives who will operate out-ethics, off-policy orgs.
Either way, you're setting yourself up for losses.
Therefore, it is now a Comm Ev offense for a Course Supervisor or MAA
(Ethics Officer) to allow the following out-ethics activities in their
course rooms, with the result of declare of being a suppressive person:
1. Does not muster his students in the morning, after lunch, and
after dinner. precisely on time, note absences and take action.
2. Permit students to talk to each other or wander around or take
unscheduled breaks or goof off during course hours.
3. Permit students to eat or smoke in the course room.
4. Permitting persons to come into the course room and bother
students for any reason.
5. Supervisor standing around or sitting at his desk not actively
handling students who need help.
6. Not getting students through their course and graduated.
It goes without saying that all elements of HCO PL 16 March 71R WHAT IS
A COURSE? should be in on a course. A Supervisor who does not run a course
per checksheet, lets students study without dictionaries and demo kits,
does not make all materials available and does not fully apply study tech
and use Word Clearing is of course suppressive and should be declared, as
he is actively blocking Scientologists from having and benefiting from
Scientology.
Flag and FOLO observers and missions should always have a target to see
that this policy letter is fully in.
You see, our success in clearing this planet depends upon the success
of our courses as this is where we train our auditors, C/Ses, Supervisors
and administrators and that is the whole team!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As Assisted by
LRH Tech Comps Pjt Ops
LRH:MM:dr
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1978R
Remimeo Issue 1
REVISED 3 DECEMBER 1978
(Revision in this type style)
(Also issued as an HCO Policy Letter
under same date and title.)
PROCLAMATION
POWER TO FORGIVE
A Scientology minister who has been duly trained and certified in the
Confessional procedure of the Church of Scientology and is in good standing
with the Church with his certificates in force, is invested with the power
to forgive the admitted sins of an individual to whom he has administered
full Confessional procedure.
Confessionals have been part and parcel of religion nearly as long as
religion has existed.
It has been broadly recognized down through the ages that only when a
person has owned up to his sins can he experience relief from the burden of
guilt he carries because of them.
In Scientology we have had, since the early years, procedures whereby
an individual is able to confess his withholds and the overt acts
underlying them. We have long known that confessing one's overt acts is the
first step toward taking responsibility for them and seeking to make things
right again.
The acknowledgement that follows each confession in Scientology
procedure is an assurance to the person that his confession has been heard.
Such assurance helps him to end cycle on the bad things he has done and
unsticks him from a preoccupation with his guilt over them to where he can
then put his attention on constructive activities.
That is the purpose of any Confessional.
There is another element that further helps the individual to
accomplish this, and that is forgiveness.
Thus, at the end of a Confessional, when it has been fully completed,
the Scientology auditor who has administered the Confessional must inform
the person that he is forgiven for the sins he has just confessed, and that
he is cleared of these sins and free of them.
The statement that is used is:
"By the power invested in me, any overts and withholds you have fully
and truthfully told me are forgiven by Scientologists."
A special certificate is to be issued to each Scientology minister who
has been trained and certified on the Level II Course or the Confessional
Course to administer Confessional procedure, and who is in good standing
with the Church with his certificates in force, investing him with the
power to forgive the sins confessed to him by an individual in a
Confessional session.
Any auditor who is trained to deliver the Ethics Repair List has priority
in the issuance of such certificate.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk.nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1978R-1
Issue I
ADDITION OF 26 NOVEMBER 1978
C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual
Confessional
Course
PROCLAMATION: POWER TO FORGIVE
ADDITION
Addition to HCOB 10 Nov 78R, Issue I
Proclamation: Power to Forgive
Reference: BTB 8 Dec 72RCs The Confessional
Repair List (LCRC)
ON ANY ADVERSE REACTION TO THE PROCLAMATION OF FORGIVENESS, GET THE
REST OF THE WITHHOLD OR REPAIR THE WITHHOLD SESSION.
When the Scientology minister doing a Confessional or Ethics Repair
List acknowledges the confession and informs the person that his confessed
overts and withholds are forgiven, the usual response is instant relief and
VGIs. Rarely the person may react adversely such as not being able to
accept forgiveness or still feeling bad. This is because something has been
missed. The person is still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the
unconfessed overt or withhold and will not feel better until all is told.
The Scientology minister encountering this in session must get the rest of
the withhold or repair the withhold session. Should the person show this
reaction later, outside of session, the folder must be turned in to the C/S
to handle immediately.
An incomplete confession can be due to the following errors:
(a) Did not tell "all."
(b) Thought of one overt, but told a different overt.
(c) Told part of a withhold but not the rest.
(d) An overt or withhold was not taken earlier similar to basic.
(e) During the session an overt or withhold was restimulated, but
not asked for or gotten off.
(f) There have been errors in the Confessional such as withholds
gotten off more than once, false reads, out-TRs, invalidation,
evaluation, etc., and these must be cleaned up.
The above categories and the Confessional Repair List are useful to a
C/S in correcting any adverse reaction to the Power to Forgive
Proclamation, by ensuring that the person gets the full relief and VGIs
which invariably accompany a complete confession and forgiveness.
LRH:dm.kjm L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1978
C/Ses
Tech/Qual
Auditors
Class IV DATING AND LOCATING
(Reference:
Book: AXIOMS AND LOGICS
Book: THE BOOK OF E-METER DRILLS
EM DRILL 22, E-METER HIDDEN DATE;,
THIS LIFE EM DRILL 25 TRACK DATING
HCOB ALL ROUTINES, E-METER ERRORS,
4 Aug 63 COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR.)
Axiom 30: "The general rule of auditing is that anything which is
unwanted and yet persists must be thoroughly viewed, at which time
it will vanish."
-The Axioms of Scientology
Excerpt from Axiom 38: "... Truth is the exact time, place, form and
event.... Thus we see that the discovery of Truth would bring
about an As-is-ness by actual experiment."
-The Axioms of Scientology
A thetan knows that if he could remember the exact place a thing had
been generated, the exact time and the exact conditions, and the exact
person who did it, he would then get a disappearance of the thing.
Dating is the action the auditor takes to help the pc spot the exact
time something happened.
Locating is the action the auditor takes to help the pc spot the exact
place something happened.
By dating and locating, getting the exact time and place a specific
thing happened, the pc is able to blow the mass and energy connected with
the occurrence which has hung him up at that point.
Date/Locate, as called for in the various prepared correction lists, is
a very effective tool for the handling of certain items found to be out on
such a list. These could be points of overrun, wins that have been bypassed
or invalidated in some way, moments of loss, trauma, painful emotion, or
any of various stuck points of this nature. It is also used in the
correction of wrong dates or wrong locations given the pc in previous
auditing.
In any of these cases the pc will be somewhat stuck at these points, or
at the very least will have some attention units hung up at these points,
and getting the exact "when" and "where" will unstick him.
That which is viewed in its own time, place, form and event can be as-
ised.
WHY YOU DATE AND LOCATE
A person can have a wrong date for an incident, or he might have a date
totally occluded. He might have a confusion on two incidents, thinking one
happened before the other when it is actually vice versa. He could have two
incidents collapsed into one, time-wise. Or, more severely, he can be stuck
in the time of an incident which acts as present time for him. In other
words, that time is still in existence for him in PT. He is seeing things
from that point in time.
By dating it exactly you blow the stuck viewpoint in time. You see it as a
blowdown on the meter and the pc will feel the sudden dissipation of mass.
The question might then arise: If you have dated an incident to a
"blow" what is there left to blow on the Locate step? The answer is that,
in addition to a stuck viewpoint in time, a person can have a stuck
viewpoint of location.
Since he had the wrong time, he could, as well, have the wrong
location, or an occluded location, or a confusion between two or more
locations. He could be quite stuck in a past location. That past location
is still in existence for him. The point of view from that location is
still there for him.
So you date and locate. Finding when it was and where it was blows both
the time of the incident and the place of the incident. If he's still hung
up in either of these he's out of present time and out of present location.
Getting the precise date and location blows him out of these into present
time.
Sometimes during dating the pc spots the correct past location
simultaneously with getting the correct date, and it (the location) then
blows at the same time. The auditor must know that this can occur and
recognize when it does as he would not then rotely try to put the pc
through the Locate steps.
DATE/LOCATE NOT A ROTE PROCEDURE
While Date/Locate is a precise action, it is by no means a rote
procedure. The auditor must know the theory of the action if he is to
Date/Locate successfully. He must understand that he takes the pc's data
and he works with the pc. Robotic application of the steps will not only
not produce the desired result but can result in messing up a case badly.
BLOW
Definition of blow: The sudden dissipation of mass in the mind with an
accompanying feeling of relief. (Technical Dictionary.)
This definition must be understood by both auditor and pc. It is
cleared with the pc before beginning the Date/Locate steps. Have the pc
demo it, using a demo kit, if necessary, so he has no confusion on it.
A blow is a definite manifestation. Vital data for the auditor is that
the pc must say "Something blew" or "It disappeared" or "It's gone" or "It
vanished," not simply "I feel lighter."
METERING
During Dating/Locating the pc is on the meter but the auditor is
consulting the pc and getting the pc's answers, while also keeping an eye
on the meter. He does not resort to meter dating or meter locating unless
the pc himself gives up on one or the other of these steps.
A pc can be made more dependent on the meter or can be made more
independent of the meter, depending upon the way the meter is used by the
auditor. If the pc's case is improving he becomes more independent of the
meter. That is the direction you want to go.
"RULE: Use the meter to date and verify date correctness by all means
but only after the pc has been unable to come up with the date." (HCOB 4
Aug 63, ALL ROUTINES, E-METER ERRORS, COMM CYCLE ERROR.)
The same rule would apply to using the meter on the Locate steps.
TIME
When dating anything you are using a system of measurement of time.
There are various systems for measuring time and as time is basically a
postulate or consideration there is no absolute system for measuring time.
Time can be measured in terms of years ago. It can be measured by year,
month and day (1918 AD, January 1st). These two systems are applicable to
this planet, as the term "year" is the time it takes this planet to
complete an orbit around the sun. In larger whole track dates different
systems were used. The whole point is to use the system the pc is using,
because the whole point of dating is to blow a past time that the pc is
stuck in. And the pc will very often use the dating system of the time
period he is stuck in. It doesn't matter what system of time measurement
the pc uses. It is important that the auditor accepts and uses the system
the pc is using and doesn't try to change it.
You're first going to ask the pc, "When was it?". He may tell you in
terms of "years ago" or "weeks ago." Or he may say "It was 1890" or "It was
the 24th of August 1672." Or he may use an earlier track system of dating.
Either way, you take it, and if he has said "High noon on May 2nd, 1912"
you don't then ask "How many years ago?" as he has just told you, and your
question would be altering the dating system the pc is using.
YOU CAN USE ANY SYSTEM OF TIME MEASUREMENT IN DATING; THE IMPORTANT
THING IS THAT YOU USE THE SYSTEM THE PC IS USING.
It is remarkable that a pc can date something that happened earlier
than this planet in terms of years ago. He can by some sort of mental
computer, but the auditor mustn't require that the pc convert a date to
some other system.
And when the pc has it, the auditor doesn't then alter-is it in
sequence. Found by years-months-weeks-days-hours-minutes-seconds and
fractions of a second, one doesn't then call it back by day, year, month,
as it tangles the pc. It is called back in the same order.
WHEN CALLING BACK A DATE AS AN INDICATION, ALWAYS CALL IT BACK IN THE
SAME SEQUENCE THAT THE DATE WAS FOUND OR GIVEN.
IMPLANT DATES/ACTUAL DATES
Implant dates usually only give small reads whereas actual dates read
well. If you suspect that you are getting false dates out of an implant,
you meter check "Implant date?" and you'll get a read on that question, and
the false implant date will no longer read. The actual date will read well.
Meter check if it is:
a) a false date from an implant?
b) an actual date?
and the meter read will tell.
DATING
THE PURPOSE OF DATING IS TO GET A BLOW OF THE PAST TIME THE PC IS STUCK
IN.
Whether the pc gives the date, or whether the auditor has to meter date
it, you must remember that all you are going for is a blow.
Sometimes you will get a blow as easily as the pc saying "It was a long
time ago." A blow is accompanied by a BD and F/N. So be alert when dating
for a sudden or BD and F/N. And if the pc doesn't originate that it blew,
ask him so you won't go on trying to date to blow, something that has
already blown!
Very often a date has to be dated precisely down to the fraction of a
second in order to get a blow.
If there is no blow on pc giving the date, or on auditor meter dating
it, you then call the date back as an indication and it will blow. If it
doesn't it is because there is an error in the date, or the auditor altered
the date or its sequence in calling it back, or there already was a blow on
dating that wasn't noticed and was overrun.
Usually a pc will need help from the auditor to start with and the
auditor might need to do the whole dating drill on the meter establishing
the order of magnitude and every part of the date on the meter. Then the
pc's ability improves and the pc starts to become more able to find dates
himself. The auditor must be alert for this and accept the pc's data and
never challenge, meter check or invalidate the pc's data. Sometimes the pc
will blurt the whole date out at once, and the auditor must be ready to
write this down accurately and call it back accurately.
LOCATIONS AND DISTANCE
When locating something you are using direction and a system of
measurement of distance. Just as time is basically a consideration, so is
distance. And there are many systems of measuring distance, both on this
planet and earlier on the track. Distance can be measured in miles,
kilometers, light-years, to name a few. In one whole track space opera
civilization, intergalactic distances were measured in terms of how long it
took a particular spaceship, called a Hylan and intergalactic distances
were measured by the number of "days of Hylan spaceflight." You will
probably find that the pc will tend to use the system of measurement of
distance that was used at the time of the past location that he is stuck
in. Just as a pc can use a sort of mental computer to convert whole track
dates into "years ago," he can also mentally convert some distances into
"miles." But the auditor never expects him to do so, and never asks him to.
YOU CAN USE ANY SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT OF DISTANCE IN LOCATING, THE
IMPORTANT THING IS THAT YOU USE THE SYSTEM THE PC IS USING.
And when you have the distance you must call it back accurately, and
not alter-is it in sequence either.
WHEN CALLING BACK A DISTANCE AS AN INDICATION, ALWAYS CALL IT BACK
ACCURATELY, AND IN THE SAME SEQUENCE THAT IT WAS GIVEN OR FOUND.
LOCATING
THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING IS TO GET A BLOW OF THE PAST LOCATION THE PC IS
STUCK IN.
As in dating the auditor may have to help the pc with the meter but
usually the pc will be able to find and give the data, and the auditor
never resorts to the meter if the pc can get it.
And you may get a blow on direction step alone or on the pc realizing
it happened somewhere else, or "not here" or "Greece" or whatever. The
auditor must be alert for the or BD and F/N and ask the pc if it blew, so
as not to go on trying to get a blow of a location that has already blown!
Usually if you don't get a blow on finding the direction and distance, you
will get a blow on calling the location back to the pc as an indication. If
not there is an error in the direction or distance or the auditor altered
it in calling it back.
In locating, the auditor is getting the past physical location. E.g.
the auditor gets the direction, distance, what galaxy, star, planet,
country, etc., pinpointing it down to the exact location in space where it
happened.
But these items are not taken up rotely; one uses the questions that
apply.
For example, if it occurred "next door" one would not ask "What
planet?". Or if the pc has said it's "two years ago" when dating, in
locating one doesn't then ask "What galaxy?" as, of course, it's this one.
Or what star, either. If you start asking "What galaxy?" on an incident on
Earth the pc is thrown backtrack.
And if it happened outside a town in the open you wouldn't ask what
city, house, or street or room, either. You must use the questions that
apply.
The pc is of course IN the auditing room. One doesn't ask where he is.
And it's never "Who else was there?" or "What else is there?" as these
things put the pc down the track. One does not try to run engrams at the
same time one is doing the Locate step. It is simply location. Where? What?
How far? Location.
AND in locating, if there is no instant blow when the location is fully
spotted and it seems correct, the location is called back to the pc. It
usually blows when it is called back to the pc after it is known.
TWO SEPARATE DRILLS
There are two separate drills for dating and locating, and which is
used depends upon pc ability to find and give the data. The first drill
given is where the pc volunteers or gives the data. The second drill is
where the auditor establishes all the data by metering. As with all
processing, the pc's ability increases as you go along, and the auditor
must be alert for this and change from meter dating and meter locating to
accepting and taking the pc's data. It can also happen that a pc who was
able to find and give the data may run into something particularly heavy
and now need assistance from the auditor. The rule is:
NEVER RESORT TO THE METER IF THE PC CAN FIND AND GIVE THE DATA, AND
NEVER LET A PC STRUGGLE IF HE CAN'T FIND THE DATA. AND NEVER, NEVER USE THE
METER TO CHALLENGE, 'CORRECT' OR INVALIDATE THE PC'S DATA.
PRELIMINARY STEP
Before dating and locating on a pc for the first time you must clear
what you will be doing and the words and terms used, so that he understands
these and knows what is expected of him.
1. Give the pc an R-Factor that you will be dating the past time of the
incident (i.e. when it happened), until that blows.
2. Clear the word "blow" with the pc per the Tech Dictionary definitions
No. 1 and No. 2.
3. Clear any misunderstoods the pc has on dates and dating or words used
in measurement of time, or numbers (e.g. "billions," etc.).
4. Give the pc an R-Factor that you will be establishing the
direction and distance in order to find the past location of the
incident (i.e. where it happened), until that blows.
5. Clear the term "direction" and the concept of pointing. Clear the
term "distance" and any misunderstoods the pc has on measurement of
distance (e.g. miles, lightyears, etc.).
6. Let the pc know you will be getting answers from him, not the meter,
unless it is necessary to help him with the meter. And that if the pc
should suddenly get the date or location he should tell you. Also let
the pc know that you are dating and locating to get a blow and that
when a blow occurs to tell you, as the purpose of this procedure is to
get the mass to blow.
DATING TO BLOW/LOCATING TO BLOW
PROCEDURE BY STEPS
PROCEDURE ONE, PC GIVING THE DATA
DATING DRILL No. 1
1. R-Factor: "We're going to date the past time when that (________)
happened precisely, until the mass blows."
2. Ask the pc when it happened. (If the pc doesn't know, go to meter
dating, per Dating Drill No. 2.)
3. Write down the pc's answer.
4. If not already given, have the pc give the rest of the date right on
down to the
fraction of a second.
5. Call the date back to the pc accurately and in the same sequence in
which it was
given, and it will blow.
(Caution: The blow may occur earlier in the dating steps and the auditor
must not go on past a blow. If you suspect a blow and pc hasn't
volunteered this, ask him if it blew.)
LOCATING DRILL No. 1
1. R-Factor: "We're going to find the past location where ( ) happened
precisely, until the mass blows."
2. Get the pc to point to where it happened. (Points with finger in the
direction to the past location.)
3. Ask the pc the distance to that location. (This is the distance from
where the pc is now to that past location.)
4. If not already given have the pc give the rest of the distance right
on down to fractions, until you have a precise distance.
5. Call the distance back to the pc accurately and in the same sequence
in which it was given, and it will blow.
NB. If the pc starts giving you the location in some other terms such as
"On the corner of Times Square, New York," you would of course accept
the pc's data, and not ask him to convert that into miles away, or
anything else.
(Caution: The blow may occur earlier in the locating steps and the
auditor must not go on past the blow. Sometimes the blow will occur on
asking the pc to point. Sometimes the pc while dating will also get the
location and blow it too. If you suspect a blow due to a BD and F/N and
the pc hasn't volunteered this, ask him if it blew . )
PROCEDURE TWO, AUDITOR FINDING THE DATA BY METERING
DATING DRILL No. 2
If the pc didn't know when it happened (on step 2 of Dating Drill No.
1), you go to meter dating.
1. Establish what system of dating or time measurement this date is
measured in. Such as "years ago," or by year (i.e. 1918 AD), or some
entirely different system. Do not do this if you already know it is a
this lifetime date, or a this planet date, as that would be robotic.
2. Establish the order of magnitude.
3. Meter date the date right on down precisely, even to fractions of a
second, until you get a blow-F/N.
4. If no blow-F/N when the full date is found, call it back to the pc
accurately and in the same order it was found and you should get a
blow.
5. If you haven't got a blow, there is either an error in the date or
some part of the date, or it is not precise enough, or it blew earlier
and wasn't noticed.
Meter check:
Wrong date?
Incompletely dated?
Implant date?
Some part of the date was incorrect?
Already blown?
and handle what reads, and you will get a blow-F/N.
LOCATING DRILL No. 2
It is rare that a pc can't get the direction and distance, or otherwise
pinpoint the exact past location. Should you encounter this, do the same
drill as given in Locating Drill No. 1, with the auditor establishing each
step by metering.
1. Get pc to point to the location to get direction.
2. Establish what system of measurement of distance (i.e. miles, or
light-years, or whatever).
3. Get the distance.
4. Get any remaining increments of distance on down to fractions or
decimal points.
5. Call back the distance or location as an indication, and you should
get a blow- F/N.
6. If no blow there has been an error and you should meter check:
Is some part of the location wrong?
Wrong direction?
Wrong distance?
Incompletely located?
Already blown?
and handle what comes up, and you will get a blow-F/N.
CAUTION: In Date/Locate, if it bogs and the auditor can't easily correct
the error in dating or in locating, do not continue messing up the pc with
wrong dates or wrong locations, as these can be very upsetting to a case.
INDICATE TO THE PC THAT THERE IS AN ERROR IN DATING OR LOCATING AND END OFF
FOR C/S INSTRUCTIONS .
A drill that can be used in locating when applicable is given below.
This must not however be done rotely when it doesn't apply. If you knew the
incident occurred in the recent past or this lifetime, you would not ask
"What galaxy?" as the question wouldn't make sense, and would throw the pc
backtrack.
Point (pc points with finger)
Distance? (including increments of distance to get the exact
distance)
What galaxy?
What star?
What planet?
What country?
What city?
What street?
What house?
Position on street?
What room?
Distance from front of house?
Where in the room?
How far from each wall?
How far off the floor?
How far from the ceiling?
continuing with questions which will narrow it down to the precise
location, to a blow-F/N .
NOTE: The above steps, particularly, cannot be rote. Listen to the pc and
work with him, realistically, to get the location spotted exactly, but do
not evaluate for him in any way.
If at some point on these steps the location turns out to be in the
middle of the ocean or in a field, etc., the auditor uses available
landmarks or reference points to get the location (i.e., distance from the
nearest point of land? or, distance from the big rock?) down to a blow-F/N.
If, while locating, the pc starts running the incident or gives too
much "scene" the auditor has the pc point again, then continues from where
he left off on the Locate steps.
LIABILITY
In dating and locating there is a possible source of BPC, peculiar to
dating and locating.
A correct date for one incident or mass can act as a wrong date for
another incident or mass, as it is a wrong date for it.
A correct location for one incident or mass can act as a wrong location
for other incidents or masses, as it is wrong for the others.
It is peculiar to dating and locating that a right date or a right
location can cause BPC by also being a wrong date or wrong location for
other incidents or masses. This does not always occur, but is noted here
should an auditor or C/S encounter it.
Manifestations of this are:
a) pc getting upset inexplicably
b) getting a read on both "Correct date?" and "Wrong date?"
c) TA going up
d) increase of mass or pressure.
It will relieve on the indication that the date found is a wrong date
for other incidents or masses, and on the indication that the location
found is a wrong location for other incidents or masses.
SUMMARY
A CORRECT DATE, ESPECIALLY IF TAKEN DOWN TO SECONDS AND FRACTIONS OF A
SECOND, WILL BLOW.
A CORRECT LOCATION, ESPECIALLY IF TAKEN DOWN TO MINUTE INCREMENTS OF
DISTANCE, WILL BLOW.
Date/Locate, when done correctly, quickly and smoothly, works well and
is successful. The longer it takes the more it will restimulate all sorts
of other things which have nothing to do with the course of action.
The Date/Locate steps must NOT be done robotically. One has to
understand the mechanics of how it's done and why.
The essence of Date/Locate is to bring the pc to PT by erasing the date
by spotting and the location by spotting, as the pc is out of PT fixed by
both date and location.
If the theory is understood nobody would do it rotely.
This is a highly precise action to be done smoothly with good TRs. Its
results are phenomenal.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:pm.dm.jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 NOVEMBER 1978
Auditors
Class IV
and above URGENT-IMPORTANT
C/Ses
Class IV
and above L & N LISTS-THE ITEM "ME"
RULE: THE ITEM "ME" MUST BE ACCEPTED ON ANY S & D LIST.
RULE: THE ITEM "ME" MUST NEVER BE REPRESENTED.
The item "Me" on an L & N list must be accepted as the item, as it is
basically the only right item there could be for an identity or valence
list.
The item "Me" often appears on S & D lists, or similar L & N lists
which ask for an identity or valence. If it is not accepted, or if it is
represented, it will really mess up the case. (This includes the pronouns,
"myself," and "I.")
The right thing to do when the pc gives this item, is to accept it as
the item for the list, and do not continue that list or take any further
action with that item.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dm.clb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 NOVEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Word Clearers (Cancels BTB 21 July 1971RE
Class IV Grad Word Clearing Correction List Revised)
and above
Auditors
C/Ses
Word Clearing Series 35RF
WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST
The WCCL is the list to use when any form of Word Clearing bogs down.
Any and all trouble with Word Clearing should be corrected by assessing and
handling this list. The WCCL has been designed to parallel errors made in
Word Clearing. not study, not the person's case, and it is to be used in
Word Clearing sessions to correct Word Clearing errors.
If, after the Word Clearing Correction List has been fully handled,
there seems to be other bypassed charge connected with the subject of
study, a Study Green Form should be done.
This list can be assessed Method 3 or Method 5.
All Word Clearers are to check out on and use this list to correct Word
Clearing errors.
1. IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR CASE? _________
If this list is being assessed during course room metered Word
Clearing, end off for C/S instructions, otherwise assess and handle a
C/S Series 53.
2. HAVE YOU BEEN WORD CLEARED OVER OUT-RUDS? _________
Find out which and handle to F/N and VGIs.
3. IS A WORD STILL MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Find out which and get it cleared to F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing,
clear it E/S to EP.)
4. WAS A WORD IN A DEFINITION MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Find out which word and get it cleared to F/N.
5. COULDN'T YOU FIND THE ACTUAL MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Using your meter and 2WC, find the misunderstood word and clear to
F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing clear it E/S to EP.)
6. DID YOU NOT GET THE BASIC WORD? _________
Find out which word or subject was not taken to EP, locate the
misunderstood words and clear each to F/N, going E/S to EP.
7. DID YOU FAIL TO USE THE WORD YOU WERE CLEARING IN ENOUGH SENTENCES?
_________
Get the word used in sentences until it is fully understood, to F/N
and VGIs.
8. DID YOU NEED TO DEMO THE WORD YOU WERE CLEARING? _________
Get the word demoed to full understanding, F/N and VGIs.
9. WERE YOU USING AN IMPROPER DICTIONARY? _________
Find out what word and what dictionary. Get a proper dictionary and
clear it to F/N and VGIs.
10. WAS THERE AN EARLIER SIMILAR MISUNDERSTOOD WORD NOT CLEARED?
_________
Find out what it is and clear it to F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing,
clear it E/S to EP.)
11. DID YOU NOT FEEL GOOD ABOUT A WORD WHEN IT WAS CLEARED?
_________
Find the word and reclear it to F/N.
12. DO YOU KEEP FORGETTING WORDS YOU HAVE ALREADY DEFINED? _________
Locate the other or related word he didn't define and clear it to
F/N.
13. DID YOU HAVE TO CLEAR A WORD YOU ALREADY KNEW? _________
Find out what the word was and indicate. If no F/N get off any
protest or inval and rehab to F/N.
14. WAS A WORD OVERRUN? _________
Find out what word and rehab.
15. WAS A WORD READING ON PROTEST? _________
Get which word, indicate. If no F/N handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
16. DID A WORD NOT REALLY READ? _________
Get which word, indicate. If no F/N handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
17. COULDN'T YOU HEAR THE WORD CLEARER? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
18. DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THE WORD CLEARER SAID? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
19. DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THE ACTION BEING DONE? _________
Find out what it was and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N or clear it
up with correct references to F/N and VGIs.
20. WERE YOU CONFUSED BY SOMETHING? _________
Find out what it was and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N or clear it
up with correct references to F/N and VGIs.
21. WERE YOU PUZZLED WHY THE WORD CLEARER KEPT ON WORD CLEARING?
_________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N or rehab
the win.
22. ON WORD CLEARING DID YOU FEEL OVERWHELMED? _________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
23. ON WORD CLEARING DID YOU FEEL HOPELESS? _________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
24. ON WORD CLEARING DID YOU FEEL INVALIDATED? _________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
25. ON WORD CLEARING WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION?
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
26. ON WORD CLEARING WERE YOU PROTESTING? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
27. DID YOU GET DISTRACTED DURING WORD CLEARING? _________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
28. WAS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE F/Ns INDICATED? _________
Find out what happened and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N or clear
to F/N any words not fully cleared.
29. DID YOU HAVE TO LOOK UP TECHNICAL OR SPECIALIZED DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
THAT DIDN'T APPLY? _________
Find out what the word was. Indicate this was an unnecessary action.
Correctly clear the word to F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing, take E/S
to EP.)
30. DID YOU TELL THE WORD CLEARER IT WAS UNDERSTOOD JUST TO GET RID OF HIM?
_________
Get the word (plus any others) and clear each to F/N.
31. WAS IT NOT YOUR MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
32. WAS THERE INVALIDATION OF KNOWINGNESS? _________
Find out what it was, and handle with itsa E/S itsa to F/N.
33. DID YOU USE THE WRONG SIZED CANS? _________
False TA Checklist. Work out the right sized cans with the pc.
34. DID YOUR HANDS GET TIRED IN WORD CLEARING? _________
False TA Checklist. Work out the right sized cans with the pc.
35. WAS A WORD ON THE LIST OF SUBJECTS MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Find out what it is and clear to F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing,
take E/S to EP.)
36. IS A SUBJECT STILL MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
Get which subject and which word and clear it to F/N. (If Method 1
Word Clearing, take E/S to EP.)
37. DID YOU NOT GET THE BASIC SUBJECT? _________
Find out what subject is incomplete by 2WC, locate the misunderstood
words in it and clear each to F/N. (If Method 1 Word Clearing, take E/S
to EP.)
38. IN REGARD TO EARLIER SUBJECTS OR COURSES YOU STUDIED DID YOU FIND ANY
OF THEM DIFFICULT? _________
When this question is answered ask this second question: WERE THERE
ANY WORDS ON THESE COURSES THAT YOU DIDN'T FULLY UNDERSTAND? Find by
subject and get each defined. Then do steps again until both questions
F/N.
39. DO YOU STILL HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON EARLIER COURSES? _________
Find out which course (or courses) and get each misunderstood word
cleared. Then recheck the question and handle until it F/Ns on
checking.
40. DO YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS ON YOUR EARLIER THAN SCIENTOLOGY SCHOOL OR
FAMILY TRAINING? _________
When this question has been answered, ask: WAS THERE ANY WORD IN
(SUBJECT NAMED) YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? Get it fully defined to F/N and
all such words cleared up for that subject. Handle all subjects the
person has named as above. Then recheck the original question and
handle until it F/Ns on checking.
41. WERE YOU BEING WORD CLEARED ON AN UNREADING SUBJECT? _________
Find out what. Indicate. If no F/N rehab or Date/Locate.
42. WAS A SUBJECT OVERRUN? _________
Find out what and indicate. If no F/N rehab.
43. WAS A MISUNDERSTOOD SUBJECT MISSED? _________
Find out which subject(s) and which words and clear each to F/N. (If
Method 1 Word Clearing, take E/S to EP.)
44. DID YOU TRY TO MAKE THE LIST F/N? _________
Put in ruds on Word Clearing, each to F/N, VGIs. Rehab any overruns.
45. IS THERE A SUBJECT WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE LIST BUT WASN'T?
_________
Find out what the subject is and clear all misunderstood words to
F/N, going E/S to EP.
46. HAS A WIN BEEN BYPASSED? _________
Find out what and rehab.
47. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
Find out what and handle or return to the C/S.
48. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE? _________
Indicate. If no F/N rehab or Date/Locate.
49. IS THERE SOME OTHER BYPASSED CHARGE ON THE SUBJECT OF STUDY?
_________
Assess and handle a Study Green Form.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 NOVEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Also issued as HCO PL 28 Nov 78)
AUDITORS WHO MISS WITHHOLDS, PENALTY
As one of the most destructive things an auditor can do is miss a
withhold on a pc and as missing a withhold stems exactly from being
inexpert, out-metering, out-TRs, or mutual out-ruds, and as pcs and staff
can blow and cause a great deal of trouble when withholds have been missed
in Sec Checking or Confessionals, the penalty for missing a withhold on a
pc is as follows:
Comm Ev, and if found guilty, suspension of certificates until
retrained.
This penalty has been issued in the past but was omitted in modern
compilations.
It is no light thing to mess up Sec Checking on a pc.
Pcs who blow their auditing in orgs, staff who want to leave, out-
ethics mushrooming up in an org can usually be traced to one or more
auditors who miss withholds either by their own out-tech or mutual ruds.
It is highly possible that the reason husband/wife teams often fail is
that they have mutual out-ruds or that they miss withholds on each other.
This is no light thing. If this order is not vigorously enforced, lack
of enforcement will end up destroying lives, just as it does in the wog
world every day.
So, get your ethics presence up and make sure that Sec Checking is done
correctly, without error and with no missed withholds.
This HCOB/PL is retroactive for a decade.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:at.kjm
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 NOVEMBER 1978
All C/Ses
NED Auditors
Scn Auditors
C/S Series 104
DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS
Well, well. I seem to have been right in Book One about making Clears,
but it seems to have exceeded mass reality.
WARNING TO NED AND SCN AUDITORS
If the case you are auditing has a fantastic win and then seems to go
into a decline, beware-the pc might have become a pre-OT and that funny
behavior of the needle and tone arm might have been a floating TA, when he
went Clear.
NOTE FOR C/Ses
I have found some very interesting case phenomena being resolved since
past Dianetic Clears are attesting to the state.
Some of the manifestations of some of the cases who were audited past
Dianetic Clear (unrecognized and unattested to) are:
(a) Manifesting PTSness and illnesses until the state was
acknowledged and attested to.
(b) Appearing to be no case gain, out-ethics cases.
(c) Not moving up the Bridge but remaining "parked" at some point.
(They have many "reasons" for this.)
(d) Becoming inactive as a Scientologist.
A C/S should look for these cases and recognize them when he sees them.
This in no way means that every PTS or out-ethics case has an
unacknowledged state of Clear underlying it but this fact certainly needs
to be included in any C/S's case debug line-up.
In the cases mentioned above, you will almost always find that the
condition started at a certain point in the pc's auditing (or in his last
life, as a pc). If you do a thorough folder study and interview the pc you
will find that he went Dianetic Clear just prior to the case going awry.
(Or, by interview, you might find he went Dianetic Clear in his last life.)
(Note: One percent have track dates when they went Clear.)
Advance Scheduling Registrars and those working in the Central Files of
an org can go through CF folders and ask the org C/S to check the folders
of those who have drifted off lines or stopped going up the processing side
of the Bridge, as an unacknowledged Dianetic Clear state may just be the
cause.
CLEAR IN LAST LIFE
Some people didn't believe one had lived before this life. Also some
people wondered what happened to old Dianeticists and Scientologists who
had died. But
others used to have the phrase "Well, we'll pick them up in the next
lifetime," or "the next time around."
Well it seems like the former shouldn't have wondered and the latter
were right. We are coming up with quite a few pcs who had gone Clear in
their last lifetime during Book One auditing, Goals Processing, etc. This
is something that the pc originates or something he has been "wondering
about" but invalidated.
INVAL/EVAL
The state of Clear having been truly attained yet not acknowledged and
attested to, can cause an extraordinary amount of invalidation. Evaluation
also occurs on this subject and comes from others and even the pc himself.
Because of the amount of inval and eval which may exist, a pc will
often have to have these buttons put in before he can acknowledge the state
he has attained. In this case this would have to be done before the point
he went Clear is Date/Located. In some cases you may have to assess a
Dianetic Clear Repair List to handle the pc's bypassed charge.
ETHICS WARNING
It is a comm-evable offense to coach the pc with data about Clear in
any way. You also do not evaluate for any pc and try to convince him he has
gone Dianetic Clear when he hasn't. You do not turn to "the pc must have
gone Dianetic Clear" when you can't easily solve a pc's case. You use the
C/S Series in full.
Only a C/S who is Clear and who knows the full EP of Dianetic Clear can
send a pc through to attest to this state. To send a pc through to attest
to Dianetic Clear when he hasn't truly made it is a suppressive act as that
preclear will not make it on the OT levels.
If the C/S is not a Clear he should send the person or the person's
folders to a Class IV Org C/S who is Clear, or to an AO.
THE POWER OF AUDITING
The power of modern auditing shouldn't be underestimated. It was pretty
hot in 1950, but realize there were 28 years of research and development.
This has been enormously stepped up. For 28 years, apparently, the power of
auditing has been underestimated .
With better trained auditors than ever, and with their TRs and metering
really in, the C/S who is keeping tech in on his lines can expect a lot
more of this sort of thing, so he must be alert to it, without at the same
time going delusory or failing to handle cases that really are bogged for
quite some other reason.
Given standard tech used by standard auditors and C/Sed by standard
C/Ses, there is no reason why we cannot Clear the planet.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mm.nc.
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 NOVEMBER 1978
C/Ses
Tech/Qual (Cancels BTB 31 Aug 72RB,
Auditors Confessional Procedure)
HCOs
Checksheets CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE
Confessional
Courses
(Ref: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS
HCOB 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24
IMPORTANT, METERING
READING ITEMS
HCOB 8 Feb 62 URGENT, MISSED WITHHOLDS
HCOB 12 Feb 62 HOW TO CLEAR WITHHOLDS
AND MISSED WITHHOLDS
HCOB 3 May 62R ARC BREAKS, MISSED
Rev. 5.9.78 WITHHOLDS
HCOB 11 Aug 78 I RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS
& PATTER
HCOB 20 Sep 78 AN INSTANT F/N IS A READ
Rev. 9.10.78
HCOB 14 Mar 71R F/N EVERYTHING
Corr. & Rev. 25.7.73
HCOB 3 Sep 78 URGENT, URGENT, URGENT,
DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
HCOB 10 Aug 76R R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN
Rev. 5.9.78
HCOB 17 May 69 TRs AND DIRTY NEEDLES
HCOB 6 Sep 78 FOLLOWING UP ON DIRTY
NEEDLES
BTB 8 Dec 72RC CONFESSIONAL REPAIR LIST
Re-rev. 4.6.77 (LCRC)
HCOB 10 Nov 78R PROCLAMATION: POWER TO
FORGIVE
HCOB 10 Nov 78R-I PROCLAMATION: POWER TO
Add. 26.11.78 FORGIVE-ADDITION
HCOB 28 Nov 78 AUDITORS WHO MISS WITHHOLDS,
PENALTY
BOOK: THE BOOK OF E-METER DRILLS.
SEC CHECKING HCOBs.
SEC CHECKING TAPES and TAPE DEMOS since 1961.)
___________
"Sec Checking," "Integrity Processing" and "Confessionals" are all the
exact same procedure and any materials on these subjects is interchangeable
under these titles (HCOB 24 Jan 1977 TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP )
Withholds don't just add up to withholds They add up to overts, they
add up to secrecies, they add up to individuations, they add up to games
conditions, they add up to a lot more things than O/W.
You are straightening out somebody on a moral code, the "Now I'm
supposed to's." They've transgressed on a series of "Now I'm supposed
to's." Having so transgressed, they are now individuated. If their
individuation is too obsessive, they snap in and become the terminal. All
of these cycles exist around the idea of the transgression against the "Now
I'm supposed to's." That is what a Confessional clears up and that is all
it clears up. It's a great deal more than a withhold. (HCOB 1 March 77, Iss
III, FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS.)
PROCEDURE
A Confessional must be done by someone who is a well trained auditor,
skilled in TRs, basic auditing and metering, who can make a prepared list
read, and who has been fully checked out and drilled on these techniques.
Every reading question of a Confessional is F/Ned. The original
question must be taken to F/N, not some other question.
Here is the basic procedure for a Confessional:
1. Set up the room with the auditor seated closer to the door than the
pc, so that he can gently put the pc back in his chair if he tries to
blow the session. Ensure all the necessary materials are to hand, per
HCOB 4 Dec 77, CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-METER.
2. Make sure the person is well fed and well rested, that his hands are
not too dry or moist, that the cans are the correct size and that the
person knows how to hold them. Include all the steps of HCOB 4 Dec 77,
CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-METER. (Also ref: FALSE TA
HCOBs.)
3. Start the Confessional. Model Session and rudiments are used. Ref:
HCOB 11 Aug 78, Iss II, MODEL SESSION. If the TA is high or low, do a
C/S Series 53RL, assess and handle. If you are not trained in doing a
C/S Series 53, end off for C/S instruction.
4. Put in any needed R-Factor on doing the Confessional. Briefly explain
the meter and the procedure to the person if they are not already known
to him or her.
The term "I am not auditing you" only occurs when a Confessional is
done for justice reasons. Otherwise the procedure is the same. (By
"justice reasons" is meant when a person is refusing to come clean on a
Comm Ev, B of I, etc., or as part of a specific HCO investigation when
the person is withholding data or evidence from such HCO personnel.)
A Confessional done for justice reasons is not auditing and the data
uncovered is not withheld from the proper authorities. Any other
Confessional is auditing and is kept confidential.
By F/Ning each question that reads, and by the use of Examiner and
review, there is a great deal of case gain in a Confessional. It
permits the person to again feel a part of his group.
5. Clear the procedure and the use of the buttons "Suppress" and "False"
etc. If necessary as an example run a non-significant question to
demonstrate the procedure (e.g. "Have you ever eaten an apple?").
6. Take up the first question and clear the words backwards. Then clear
the full command, noting any instant read that occurs on the command
while clearing, as this is valid. See HCOB 9 Aug 78 Iss II, CLEARING
COMMANDS, HCOB 28 Feb 71, C/S Series 24, IMPORTANT, METERING READING
ITEMS, and HCOB 5 Aug 78, INSTANT READS.
Ensure the pc fully understands the question and what it encompasses.
7. With good TR 1 give the person the first question, keeping an eye on
the meter and noting any instant read, i.e. SF, F., LFBD. (Ref: HCOB 5
Aug 78, INSTANT READS.) A tick is always noted and in some cases
becomes a wide read. (Ref: HCOB 28 Feb 71, C/S Series 24, IMPORTANT,
METERING READING ITEMS.) But don't assume you have a read because you
get a tick. Put in Suppress and it will either read or the tick will
vanish. In a Confessional, even the smallest change of needle
characteristic, if it is instant, is checked into
before you go on. But NOTE: YOU DON'T TAKE A RISE AS A CHANGE OF
CHARACTERISTIC IN SEC CHECKING.
8. Take up each reading question, getting the what, when, where, all of
every overt. Find out who missed it or who nearly found out, and what
that person did to make the pc wonder if he knew. Get specifics, not
general or vague answers. If no F/N, take the overt E/S to F/N. And
ensure that the original question that read is taken to F/N before you
leave it.
9. For security investigation purposes, get all the exact names, dates,
addresses, phone numbers, and any other information that might be
helpful in investigating the case further, should this be needed.
10. If the pc gives you three or four overts at once in reply to a
reading question, you note them and ensure you take each separate
reading overt or withhold to an F/N, or E/S to F/N.
11. Some people you have to ask the exact question. If your question is
even faintly off they F/N. Low responsibility of the pc does this.
12. If the person gives off another's overt, ask if he ever did something
like that. You want what the person himself has done.
13. DO NOT TAKE UP UNREADING QUESTIONS.
a) If a question does not read and does not F/N you can put in the
buttons Suppress and Invalidate, asking:
"On the question________ has anything been suppressed?"
"On the question________ has anything been invalidated?"
But don't require it to be answered and don't look up at the pc
expectantly either. If it's not reading, tell him so and go on.
b) If Suppress or Invalidate reads, it means the read has
transferred exactly from the Confessional question to the button.
(Ref: HCOB 1 Aug 68, THE LAWS OF LISTING & NULLING.) Put in the
button (simply get what the pc has to say and acknowledge), then
take up the question. Fully clean the question, as in No. 8 above.
Then go on to the next question.
c) Or, if the question reads and the pc is trying to answer it and
is groping, puzzling, baffled and doesn't have any answer, then
check False. Ask: "Was that a false read?", in which case it will
read and on indication that it was a false read will now F/N. If no
F/N, E/S to F/N.
14. FOLLOW UP FULLY ON ANY DIRTY NEEDLE. A dirty needle will either clean
or turn into an R/S. It is your hottest string to pull in finding and
turning on an R/S. Thus it is not to be overlooked. The area that is
producing a dirty needle when questioned for full data will either
clean or go into an R/S. The area that gave the dirty needle is
considered clean when you can go over it and it no longer produces a
dirty needle. If a dirty needle still persists then there is more to
the withhold itself or something the pc isn't voicing about the
withhold or how he feels about the withhold. But, pushed. with
auditor's TRs in, this dirty needle will turn into an R/S or it will
fully clean. (Ref: HCOB 6 Sept 78, FOLLOWING UP ON DIRTY NEEDLES, and
HCOB 17 May 69, TRs AND DIRTY NEEDLES.)
The auditor MUST know COLD the difference between an R/S and a dirty
needle. The difference is in the character of the read NOT the size.
(Ref: HCOB 3 Sept 78, URGENT, URGENT, URGENT, DEFINITION OF A ROCK
SLAM.)
A Confessional is not a rote procedure. Your job is to get the data
and help the pc. Sometimes you will be thrown curves or may encounter
attempts to be led off in
the wrong direction. This is simply a sure indicator the subject is
withholding and that the withhold is in restimulation. One has to
ignore the volunteer misdirections of the pc as the pc is of course
misdirecting, and simply get the read E/Sed or the W/H F/Ned. You must
use your tools as given in HCOBs, Sec Checking tapes and tape
demonstrations since 1961.
15. TAKE THE ORIGINAL READING QUESTION TO F/N. Not some other question.
This all comes under the heading of completing cycles of action and
getting one auditing question answered before you ask a second
question.
In going earlier similar to take the question to F/N, always repeat
the Confessional question as part of the earlier similar command to
keep the person on that question.
Example: "Is there an earlier similar time you ate an apple?"
16. On each question be sure you get all the overts. When you have taken
a specific chain of overts earlier similar to F/N, then re-check the
original question for any read. If it F/Ns, fine. It's clean.
If it reads you have another overt or overt chain to clear to F/N on
that question. Use False and Protest buttons as needed.
Example:
Question A: "Have you committed any overts against apples?" Meter
reads. Auditor gets an overt, takes it E/S to F/N. Auditor then re-
checks Question A. Meter reads. Pc finds another overt against apples.
Auditor takes it E/S to F/N.
You clean it, getting all, until the original question F/Ns.
(Ref: HCOB 14 Mar 71R Corr & Rev 25 Jul 73, F/N EVERYTHING HCOB 19
Oct 61, SECURITY QUESTIONS MUST BE NULLED HCOB 10 May 62, PREPCHECKING
AND SEC CHECKING.)
17. If the person gets critical, realize you have missed a withhold and
pull it. It is no light thing to miss withholds and mess up a pc when
doing a Confessional. So be alert for any of the 15 manifestations of
missed withhold and handle fully should any of these crop up. (Ref:
HCOB 8 Feb 62, URGENT, MISSED WITHHOLDS, HCOB 12 Feb 62, HOW TO CLEAR
WITHHOLDS AND MISSED WITHHOLDS, HCOB 3 May 62R Rev 5 Sep 78, ARC
BREAKS, MISSED WITHHOLDS, HCOB 11 Aug 78 Iss I, RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS
AND PATTER.)
It is wise, particularly when doing a Confessional of any length, to
periodically check the question, "In this session has a withhold been
missed?" or "Have I missed a withhold on you?".
18. At the first sign of any trouble in doing a Confessional check for:
missed withholds, false reads and ARC breaks, in that order, and fully
handle what you get. In the majority of cases the above buttons should
resolve the difficulty.
If not, handle with an LCRC (BTB 8 Dec 72RC, CONFESSIONAL REPAIR
LIST). Use of the above buttons first, however, before resorting to the
LCRC, avoids the possibility of getting into an "overrepair" situation.
19. If the pc consistently immediately dives whole track on Confessional
questions, use the preface "In this lifetime . . .", with good R-
Factor. This should not be used to prevent him going whole track on the
earlier similar command to F/N the question.
20. ONE MUST ALWAYS REPORT A ROCK SLAM IN THE AUDITING REPORT, NOTE
IT WITH SESSION DATE AND PAGE INSIDE THE LEFT COVER OF THE PC'S FOLDER
AND REPORT IT TO ETHICS INCLUDING THE QUESTION OR SUBJECT WHICH ROCK
SLAMMED, PHRASED EXACTLY. (HCOB 10 Aug 76R, Rev 5 Sep 78, R/Ses, WHAT
THEY MEAN.)
As the R/S is probably the single most important and dangerous read
on the meter, it is important that they are carefully noted when doing
a Confessional.
For a pc to be branded as an R/Ser is a very serious thing. Also for
a real R/Ser to be overlooked by an auditor is a catastrophe both to
the pc and to those around that particular person. (Ref: HCOB 24 Jan
77, TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP. )
Valid R/Ses are not always instant reads. An R/S can read prior or
latently. (HCOB 3 Sep 78, URGENT, URGENT, URGENT, DEFINITION OF A ROCK
SLAM.)
21. If you want a pc to stop fiddling with the cans you make them put
their hands on the table and keep them there.
22. HCO or executives may request a Confessional be done but neither Tech
nor Qual are bound by such requests as an FES could reveal that the
trouble stems from "out-lists" or other matters needing correction.
They should however take cognizance of such requests and do all
possible to get the person handled.
23. If a reading question does not go to F/N and bogs or the TA goes
high, take up an LCRC (Confessional Repair List, BTB 8 Dec 72RC),
assess and handle per instructions.
24. End off any Confessional session and the entire Confessional itself,
when complete, with the rudiments which would pick up anything which
might have been missed: Half Truth, Untruth, Missed Withhold, Told All,
etc. Use the prefix "In this session . . ." or "In this Confessional .
. .". Take any reading rudiment E/S as needed to F/N.
25. When the Confessional is fully completed, the auditor who has
administered the Confessional informs the person he is forgiven for the
overts and withholds he has just confessed, using the following
statement:
"By the power invested in me, any overts and withholds you have fully
and truthfully told me are forgiven by Scientologists."
The usual response of the pc is instant relief and VGIs. On any
adverse reaction to the Proclamation of Forgiveness, get the rest of
the withhold or repair the Confessional session at once.
(Ref: HCOB 10 Nov 78 R. PROCLAMATION: POWER TO FORGIVE HCOB 10 Nov
78R-1, Addition of 26 Nov 78, PROCLAMATION: POWER TO FORGIVE-ADDITION.)
26. All worksheets are routed to Tech Services so they can be included in
the person's pc folder. (Ref: HCOB 28 Oct 76, C/S Series 98, AUDITING
FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS.)
27. EXAMINER. All Confessionals must be followed immediately by a
standard pc examination. The folder is then routed to the C/S.
The C/S looks for any nonsequitur F/N on some other subject. It's the
primary thing he inspects.
If a person falls on his head after a Confessional session an LCRC is
given. However, an FES to find missing questions that F/Ned on
something else is done. Standard C/S rules apply to Confessionals.
28. On any bad Exam Report (non-F/N, BIs or nonoptimum statement) after a
Confessional, or on any person who gets sick or upset or does not do
well or has a high or low TA, give an LCRC as the very next action.
The 24-hour red tag rule must be strictly enforced.
AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND TRs
If the pc is not in session you won't get the withholds. TRs play a
large part in the pc being willing to talk to the auditor. A wrong or
challenging auditor attitude can throw the scene off as there is a
destroyed comm cycle. If TRs are rough or choppy the pc feels he's being
accused.
A poor or comm lag TR 2, hidden from the view of the C/S, can also mess
up a person in a Confessional. It invalidates his answers and makes him
feel he hasn't gotten it off. If suspected, this could be checked by D of P
interview or person to the Examiner for: "What did the auditor do?" (Also
see HCOB 16 Aug 71R Iss II, Rev 5 Jul 78, TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED.)
So TRs must be polished and the auditor, while maintaining good ethics
presence, takes the role of confessor when handling the pc's answers and
makes it safe for the pc to get off his overts and withholds. Similarly, an
auditor who is certain of his tech and does not miss withholds will build
the pc's confidence in him.
Anyone doing a Confessional should be fully trained and interned by
doing a course and interneship in the handling of Confessionals.
You had better determine to become an expert in it, since an auditor's
inability to handle this is a fast route to "how to win enemies and wrongly
influence people." (HCOB 24 Jan 77, TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP.)
But even more important is the fact that, in knowing and applying
Confessional tech correctly, you are helping the individual to face up to
his responsibilities in his group and the society and putting him back into
communication with his fellow man, his family, and the world at large.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk/clb
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?
based on
the works
of
L. Ron Hubbard
Published
December 1978
An encyclopedia is terrific and can answer some questions about the
world. But What Is Scientology? is more important. It answers questions
about the organization of life and death and gives the real answers to the
questions people ask.
What Is Scientology? contains the most extensive collection of
information ever published about Scientology and Scientologists. It is a
data-packed, fact-packed book about the fastest growing religion in the
world today: its Founder, its history, its tenets, its structure and
doctrines, its training and counseling, its effectiveness, its victories,
its future and much, much more.
It's all here: the statistics, addresses, dates, what, who, when and
how.
464 pages, 137 color photos and paintings, many charts, graphs and
documents, full index and glossary, hundreds of thousands of words, all in
a big 81/2 by 11 inch hardcover book, beautifully printed and bound on top
quality paper complete with dust jacket. Available from your nearest
Scientology Organization or Mission or direct from the publishers: Church
of Scientology Publications Organization U.S., 4833 Fountain Ave., East
Annex, Los Angeles, California 90029, U.S.A.; or Scientology Publications
Organization, Store Kongensgade 55, 1264 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
AOs
SHs
All C/Ses
All Auditors PROGRAMMING THE DIANETIC CLEAR
Tech/Qual FOR HIS NEXT STEP
Missions
(Ref: HCOB 24 Sept 78, Iss III,
DIANETIC CLEAR)
The following are the guidelines for programming a Dianetic Clear after
he has attested and the state has been declared:
1. If a Dianetic Clear has had no previous auditing on Grades 0-IV, you
can run him on Quad Grades 0-IV. You omit the R3RA step of service
facs. (Ref: HCOB 6 Sept 78, Iss III, ROUTINE THREE SC-A, FULL SERVICE
FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS.)
2. If a Dianetic Clear was incomplete on Grades 0-IV prior to the
Dianetic Clear attest (i.e. mid-grades), you would complete the unrun
grades (Quad or Expanded) through to Grade IV (omitting the R3RA steps
on Service Facs).
If a pc goes Clear on a grade then you can give him the other grades,
but you'd end off that grade and not continue it.
3. If a Dianetic Clear has previously completed Grades 0-IV, he can go
directly onto the Solo Audit Course and OT 1.
4. If a Dianetic Clear is an old-timer who has had a lot of pre-grades
Scientology processes run (before formal grades existed). you would not
run Grades 0-IV after Dianetic Clear attest. He can be routed onto the
Solo Audit Course and OT 1.
The Dianetic Clear is not run on Power, R6EW or the Clearing Course.
IMPORTANT-NEW RUNDOWN
There is even an alternate step to Power specially designed for
Dianetic Clears called "Super Power" which will shortly be available in
Saint Hills.
AND NOTE: Power Processing is still very valid and a vital step on the
Bridge for those persons not Dianetic Clear.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1978
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 DECEMBER 1978
All Auditors
All C/Ses
NED Checksheet
UNREADING FLOWS
References: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS
HCOB 25 May 62 E-METER INSTANT
READS
HCOB 28 Feb 71 C/S Series 24
METERING READING
ITEMS
HCOB 8 Jun 61 E-METER WATCH ING
HCOB 27 May 70R UNREADING QUESTIONS
Rev 3.12.78 AND ITEMS
EACH FLOW OF AN ITEM OR QUESTION IS CHECKED FOR A READ BEFORE RUNNING
IT. UNREADING FLOWS ARE NOT RUN.
One of the governing laws of auditing is that you don't run unreading
items. It doesn't matter what you are auditing. You don't run unreading
items. And you don't run unreading flows. You don't run an unreading
anything. Ever. For any reason.
Auditing is aimed at reactivity. You run what reacts on the meter
because it reacts and is therefore part of the reactive mind. A read means
there is charge present and available to run. Running reading items, flows
and questions is the only way to make a pc better. This is our purpose in
auditing. To run unreading flows, etc. requires the pc to run "analytical"
answers or to "run" things that aren't there or to put something there to
"run."
The most trouble you can get a pc into is running him on uncharged
items or flows. For an auditor to sit in session watching a meter that
didn't read, looking expectantly at the pc for an answer to an uncharged
question, flow or item is a GAE and will wreck cases faster than anything
you can do.
So you must check questions, flows or items before running anything. If
it doesn't read you just say "Thank you" and go on to the next one. You
would, of course, use the buttons to ensure nothing was suppressed!
invalidated or misunderstood before leaving an unreading item, flow or
question.
This is probably one of the reasons that it has been observed that I
can audit a pc for 2/2 hours and get the same result that another auditor
might get in 25 hours. There's nothing mysterious about it. I never run a
pc on things that aren't charged. And I don't miss reads.
I expect no less from you.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 DECEMBER 1978
C/Ses
Class III
Auditors and HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N
above
Supervisors
Cramming (Ref: HCOB 15 Oct 73RB, C/S Series 87RB,
Officers NULLING AND F/NING PREPARED LISTS)
WHEN TAKING A LIST TO F/NING ASSESSMENT AN AUDITOR MUST KNOW HOW TO
READ THROUGH AN F/N.
This is a skill that, up to this point, has been used routinely only by
highly trained auditors or a few very sharp Class IIIs or IVs or above. But
with the difficulty auditors have had in F/Ning prepared lists, it becomes
obvious that, from Class III on up, all auditors should be trained to read
the meter through an F/N.
It is the answer to almost any difficulty an auditor has had in taking
a list to F/Ning assessment.
An F/N speeds up or slows down or does different things while still
remaining an F/N and one can read through it.
It is done like this: The swinging weight of the needle (F/Ning from an
earlier item) has momentum and it will tend to obscure the read on another
item. It will almost obscure it, but not quite. You'll see the F/N "check"
or slow up briefly and then continue and this means you have a hot item.
Any item that would cause an F/N to "check" will be hot. The auditor who
can read through an F/N will spot this and handle the item then and there.
Then he continues on down the list, missing nothing, handling what is there
to be handled and, with this skilled metering, takes it to a genuinely
F/Ning list on assessment. And it doesn't take days or even several
sessions, necessarily, to do it.
If an auditor can't read through an F/N he'll miss this. He's going
down the list, the F/N "checks" or slows and he doesn't see it so he goes
right on by it. Then, within the next couple of items the F/N kills. He's
going to have a hard time F/Ning that list because he's now got a
suppressed read.
Example:
Auditor in assessing starts with an F/N which continues as he goes
on down the list calling the items. On, say, item 5 the F/N "checks" or
slows briefly. Auditor can't read through an F/N so he misses this and
goes on by. On about the 6th or 7th item the F/N packs up, and the
auditor is in a quandary because the F/N has turned off but he didn't
get a read on items 6 or 7 either. Or he may misduplicate the killed
F/N as a read on items 6 or 7 and attempt to take up one or the other
of them. Either way he's in for trouble because he's missed the actual
item and he may even try to handle a wrong item. He's going to find it
difficult to take that list to an F/Ning assessment.
The correct action when an F/N packs up this way is to go back up the
list and reassess the last several items to find the missed read. But one
should be able to read through an F/N.
Probably the main reason for pc upset or protest against "overrepair"
and being handled again and again with repair lists lies in this factor
alone-the auditor can't read through an F/N. Thus he misses the charged
items and takes up items that are
uncharged. And the repair goes on interminably, as the charged lines are
not found and handled.
This is also probably the reason that auditors have been known to back
off from having to F/N a list. They "know" from experience that it is a
laborious business.
The truth is it's not necessary for an auditor to labor over taking a
list to F/Ning assessment. It simply requires good TRs and skilled
metering, including the ability to read through F/Ns.
An auditor can be trained to see a read through an F/N. The drill would
be to sit him down in front of a meter with an F/Ning student on the cans
and assess the prepared lists in The Book of E-Meter Drills, spotting each
time he gets a "check" or a "slow" or any change in an otherwise continuing
F/N. He'll find that he can read through an F/N and become very adept at
this, and from then on he won't miss.
You'll have an auditor who is confident of his ability to F/N a list
accurately and thoroughly in one-half the time (and trauma) it would take
otherwise.
And far fewer "overrepaired" pcs. ("Overrepaired" pcs are usually pcs
with actual reads missed and false reads taken up. So "overrepair" is
really "misrepaired" or "not repaired.")
This is metering at its best and most accurate. We now expect the best
and most accurate metering from the auditor who is in the business of
F/Ning prepared lists.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH :jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 DECEMBER 1978
All C/Ses
Auditors
Tech/Qual C/S Series 105
HCO DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS-ADDITIONAL DATA
(Ref: HCOB 29 Nov 78 C/S Series 104
DIANETIC CLEAR
ATTESTS
HCOB 1 Dec 78 PROGRAMMING THE
DIANETIC CLEAR
FOR HIS NEXT STEP)
Since the HCOBs on Dianetic Clear have come out there have been many
attests and many cases unbugged, and there will continue to be more
Dianetic Clears as pcs continue to get standard processing. This bulletin
gives some additional guidelines to help smooth the lines and prevent
needless stops for the person who has made Dianetic Clear. It will also
help handle the person who hasn't made it so that he may achieve all the
gains available to him.
UNACKNOWLEDGED DIANETIC CLEARS
A person who has reached the state of Dianetic Clear without it being
acknowledged can run into difficulties afterwards. You may find that he's
been in ethics trouble or had a low OCA or poor case gain since that point.
It's not only lack of acknowledgement but also invalidation by running
certain processes that a Clear wouldn't respond to, such as engrams, or
continuing to run the grades, or continuing Goals Processing, etc.
Also, with Clears and OTs who went Clear before they did the Clearing
Course and never knew it or spotted it, bypassed charge results because
they are running something which is trying to achieve what they have
already achieved. It serves as an overrun .
In the case where a pc has this unacknowledged, invalidated Dianetic
Clear state, you would most likely find a point in his auditing where it
looks as if he had made it and a slump occurred afterwards. This point
could have occurred many years back. If you don't see a resurgence of the
state in an interview or session when the pc mentions when he went Dianetic
Clear, the C/S would be to Date/Locate it. (Ref: HCOB 15 Nov 78, DATING AND
LOCATING.)
ETHICS
The fact that a person may currently be in ethics trouble is no basis
on which to adjudicate whether or not he has achieved the state of Clear.
It is not a criterion to be used to refuse to allow the person to attest.
Clear is Clear. When a Clear is audited on R3RA, when the state is
invalidated or goes unacknowledged, he can get into trouble. So apply this
to your understanding and analysis of cases.
The MAA interview and A to J check on the Dianetic Clear Routing Form
is not to imply he's out-ethics but will furnish the C/S with data on the
case which may or may not come up in a D of P interview. It will also
detect the rare case where the person is attempting to attest in order to
save money or for status reasons. In one instance it was discovered that
the person routing through was actually a plant. These last examples are a
very, very small percentage of the cases.
METER PHENOMENA
When the state of Dianetic Clear has been acknowledged and any inval
cleaned off the line, you'll see a very floppy needle at low sensitivity,
an F/N that nothing can break up and, in many cases, a floating TA. A low
sensitivity setting (I to 4) will be needed to even keep the needle on the
dial, and the TA will be riding between 2.0 and 3.0.
You'll find in many cases that the meter now reads on the pc's
postulates-i.e., a Clear's postulates read as a surge. A read therefore
does not mean invariably "Yes" or that the question is charged. "No" can
read if the pc says it or thinks it to himself as an answer to a question.
(Ref: HCOB 18 April 68, NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV.)
Bear in mind that you might not get the above meter phenomena
immediately on a Dianetic Clear where the state has been bypassed, even
though the state is valid.
In some cases the TA and needle can be packed up prior to Date/Locate
of the exact time the pc went Clear. The pc may have out-Int to be handled.
(The handling of out-Int on a Dianetic Clear is the END OF ENDLESS INT
REPAIR RD, HCOB 24 Sep 78R, Rev. 21 Nov 78, Iss 1, Int RD Series 4R.) The
person may still be hung up on misrun R3R or Dianetics run after he went
Clear, or on some point of eval or inval that has occurred.
If, after a Date/Locate has been correctly done, you're still not
getting the expected meter phenomena, a C/S 53RL assessed and handled
precisely by the book and taken to F/Ning assessment will clean up any
remaining charge.
You'll then see a full resurgence of the state, with the pc VVVGIs, a
floating, floppy needle at low sensitivity, and a floating TA.
PRIOR DIANETIC CLEARS AND KEYED-OUT CLEARS
The definitions of Dianetic Clear and Keyed-Out Clear in HCOB 24 Sep
78, Iss III, DIANETIC CLEAR, replace the definitions in the Tech
Dictionary. The person who attested to Dianetic Clear or Keyed-Out Clear in
past years would not necessarily qualify as a Dianetic Clear now, though
the chances are good he did make it. Any pc who has attested to Dianetic
Clear or Keyed-Out Clear in the past should be called in for an interview
and any necessary C/Sing to ascertain the state. This must be adjudicated
by an AO C/S or by an org C/S who is Clear.
You will find that many of those who attested to Dianetic Clear earlier
on actually did make it, and after confirmation of this they will need to
be issued Clear certs and Clear numbers and be properly programmed to move
on up the Bridge. (See HCOB 1 Dec 78, PROGRAMMING THE DIANETIC CLEAR FOR
HIS NEXT STEP.)
Additionally, where the C/S knows of a case where it looks very likely,
from folder study, that the pc went Dianetic Clear but it was unsuspected
at the time and never originated, he should have such pcs also called in
for confirmation.
THE PERSON WHO HASN'T MADE IT
Where it is obvious that a person who has already been allowed to
attest hasn't attained Dianetic Clear. give the pc a good R-Factor that the
person handling the attest cycle didn't have all the data. He must also be
given the R-Factor that he is being programmed so as not to be denied any
of the gains on the Grade Chart and so that he will be adequately prepared
to do the OT levels. The C/S then programs the case so that this can occur
and the pc is informed he should continue with his auditing program.
In the case where the person wanting to attest clearly hasn't made it,
you tell him so. There may be some state he did achieve that he may wish to
attest to and he should be allowed to do so.
In both the above cases the person very likely has made some big gain or
achieved a new ability, so validate that and give him an appropriate
acknowledgement on his win .
NEXT STEP FOR DIANETIC CLEARS
Use HCOB 1 Dec 78, PROGRAMMING THE DIANETIC CLEAR FOR HIS NEXT STEP, as
a guide when programming the Dianetic Clear for his next action.
SUMMARY
Keep in mind that a good percentage of the cases you see who by
origination want to attest to Dianetic Clear will have achieved the state.
If you follow these guidelines and apply the HCOBs on the subject, both
those who have attained Dianetic Clear and those who haven't will be able
to move on swiftly up the Bridge on the right gradient .
C/Ses should maintain their Ivory Towers and use the above data and all
will go well in this area. It is already going well and this additional
data will handle the various situations that have come to light.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 DECEMBER 1978
C/Ses
Tech/Qual
Class IV Grad
REVIVIFICATION
Revivification is the bringing back to life of an engram in which a
preclear is stuck. The engram or some portion thereof is being acted out in
present time by the preclear It is called a revivification because the
engram is suddenly more real to the preclear than present time has ever
been. He relives that moment briefly. He does not merely recall or remember
it.
This is not the same thing as the "returning" to an incident or engram
that is employed in Dianetic auditing. Return is the method of retaining
the body and the awareness of the subject in present time while he is told
to go back to a certain incident. Revivification is the reliving of an
incident or a portion of it as if it were happening now.
This phenomenon can occur in a pc during the End of Endless Int Repair
Rundown. (Ref: HCOB 24 Sep 78R, Iss 1, Int RD Series 4R, THE END OF ENDLESS
INT REPAIR RUNDOWN.)
The pc, being run on Recalls on Int, will often begin by recalling
locks but these can trigger into full play an engram in which he may be
stuck and the pc may go into a revivification of it. He will actually be
answering and acting from the point or points down the track where he has
been stuck.
Should this happen the auditor simply continues to run the process and
get the pc through it. As the pc revivifies he blows through these stuck
points on his track and comes out of them, newly, and is now truly in
present time.
As revivification is apt to occur on the End of Endless Int Repair,
auditors must understand and be able to recognize the phenomena and handle
it routinely with excellent TRs when it does.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cib
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
(Also issued as an HCO Policy Letter
of same date and title.)
HCOB 1 OCTOBER 1978, HCOB 6 OCTOBER 1978 ON
BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN WITHDRAWN
HCOB 1 Oct 78, Reiss II Oct 78, THE BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN, and HCOB 6
Oct 78, Reiss II Oct 78, Re-Reiss 24 Oct 78, Bright Think RD Series 2,
REMEDY OF BUGGED CASES ON THE RUNDOWN, are withdrawn.
The process is most effective when preceded by other specific actions
necessary to achieving the full gain possible from the process. As such it
is being incorporated as one step of a rundown currently under research and
is NOT to be used or audited in any way otherwise.
After the date of this issue it will be deemed a HIGH CRIME if any
auditor is found to have violated the above.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cib
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 DECEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Class VI
Checksheet
Class IV and
above Auditors
C/Ses
GREEN FORM AND
EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD,
USE OF
GREEN FORM
The Green Form is a precision tool which covers the things bugging a
case that no other list will detect. It is not intended to correct session
errors or cure high or low TA. It specializes in picking up the
peculiarities and elements of a pc's life which are out of view in normal
auditing and which cause a case to behave unusually. The case may not be
particularly resistive, just bugged or not making sense and the Green Form
is the list to use to sort it out. It is an excellent C/S tool for getting
an estimate of a case and getting it untangled.
You can assess it Method 3 and handle, not going beyond the first F/N,
when ruds won't fly at the start of session, but its real use is to assess
Method 5 and then send to the C/S for programming.
If the case appears to be resistive or hasn't sorted out after a full
handling of all reading items has been done on the Green Form, then the No.
40 question, called the Resistive Cases Assessment, is assessed Method 5.
RESISTIVE CASES
Each item on the Resistive Cases Assessment has a corresponding section
on the Expanded Green Form 40RD. When an item reads on the Resistive Cases
Assessment, you go to the section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD which
corresponds (by letter) and assess Method 5 that section.
You assess one section of the Expanded Green Form 40RD for each
Resistive Cases Assessment item that reads. For example, on the Resistive
Cases Assessment, Item C "Audited With Ruds Out" and Item 1-2 "Has Taken
Drugs" read. The auditor will now go to the Expanded Green Form 40RD,
assess all of Section C "Audited With Ruds Out" and all of Section I "Has
Taken Drugs."
Then, depending on C/S instructions, the auditor will l) return the
folder to the C/S for programming of the case based on the reads he has
just gotten or, if he has C/S okay, 2) handle the reads per the
instructions given for each reading question.
HANDLING READS
The sections of the Expanded Green Form 40RD have been arranged in the
order in which they are to be taken up if reading.
Occasionally an item may read on the Resistive Cases Assessment, but
give no reads on the assessment of the appropriate section of the EXGF
40RD. (Example: Section G "Seriously Physically Ill" reads on the Resistive
Cases Assessment, but when the auditor assesses Section G on the EXGF 40RD,
even after putting in the
buttons, there are no reads.) If this occurs, check False and Protest and
take the item to an F/N.
CLEARS, OTs AND DIANETIC CLEARS
The Green Form and especially the Expanded Green Form 40RD call for
Dianetic handlings (R3RA) on many items. In using these lists on someone
who is Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, NO Dianetic handlings are done on any
items, nor is ant activity to be engaged in which brings about further
engram running.
Where Dianetic handlings are called for on items, there are given
additional, special handlings for Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears, which
consist of indicating the bypassed charge, letting the person tell you
about it if he wishes and indicating the F/N.
This, of course, cannot be considered a full handling for many items
and the Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear should be programmed for NED for OTs as
soon as possible to fully handle any areas of case which, due to his case
state, are beyond the scope of New Era Dianetics.
DRUGS
If unhandled drugs are reading, drugs must be fully handled with the
NED Drug Rundown as soon as the EXGF 40RD is complete.
If a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear is being a resistive case due to
unhandled drugs. the answer is to program the person for a Sweat Program
and even Objectives. (You do not run engrams.) The Sweat Program and
Objectives will handle drugs where they are hanging up a Clear, OT or
Dianetic Clear.
END PHENOMENA
Otherwise. unless you have missed a read, you will have handled the
resistiveness of the pc's case upon completion of the EXGF 40RD.
The Green Form, used by itself, or with the EXGF 40RD will solve cases
that no other list will handle. They will get a pc winning who has been
making no or slow case gains due to some peculiarity or element of his life
or case, and they will do this faster and more easily than ever before.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
All Orgs
All HGCs
LRH Comms/KOTs
OESs
Ref: HCO PL 6 Nov 71
Issue III
HCO PL 23 Oct 76, INTERNSHIP AND HGC, and BPL 29 Nov 1976, IMPORTANT-
INTERNSHIP AND HGC SUSPENSION are CANCELED.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Commodore's Messenger
LRH: MOD: cib
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 DECEMBER 1978R
REVISED 24 SEPTEMBER 1979
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
PC SET-UPS AND C/S 53
(Ref: C/S Series 1- 10)
The original issue of this HCOB stated "A pc set-up before a major
action must include a C/S 53RL to F/Ning list." It then named various Flag-
only rundowns. It was not intended for distribution to orgs outside Flag,
and has been misimplemented to create a shortage of pus for NED Course
students and internes and Class IV Course students and interned by
requiring that these must not audit pcs who have not first had a C/S 53 to
F/Ning list. But every major action does not require a C/S 53 to F/Ning
list as a set-up. Therefore this clarification is issued.
A pa must be set up before a major action. What this set-up consists of
is covered in C/S Series 1 - 10. It does not have to include a C/S 53 to
F/Ning list.
A C/S 53 to F/Ning list is the most thorough way to set up a case, or
to repair a case who has had rough auditing. This is because the C/S 53 is
a masterpiece in that it contains everything that could be wrong with the
mind. A pc who has had much auditing, especially if any of the auditing was
not skillfully delivered, will get a remarkable case resurgence from a C/S
53 done to F/Ning list.
But a pa who is already flying, or who has not had much auditing, does
not require a C/S 53 to F/Ning list and possibly would not even understand
many of the C/S 53 lines. It does not have to be done before every major
action. To do so would violate the rules of C/Sing and programming of
cases, and is an arbitrary. It is very poor show to enter or use
arbitraries as these prevent getting any tech done at all! And not
requiring a C/S 53 to F/Ning list does not mean that you can audit a pc who
is not set up.
Follow the rules of programming and C/Sing cases already very
adequately covered in the C/S Series, especially in C/S Series 1 - 10. It
is very easy to do.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Snr C/S Int
LRH:DM:gal
Copyright � 1978, 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
L. Ron Hubbard
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE
LRH ED 301 INT 17 December 1978
To: ALL STAFF
ALL PUBLIC
AUDITOR MAG
ORG MAGS
CENTRAL FILES
INFO PACKS
From: RON
RON'S JOURNAL 30
1978-THE YEAR OF LIGHTNING FAST NEW TECH
Hello.
I have some exciting news about services.
Processing has gotten so fast that actually clearing whole areas is in
view.
1978 was indeed the year of tech breakthroughs!
If processing had to get more expensive due to inflation, why then it
had to be made much quicker and better. Actually processing costs today per
result are much cheaper than ever before and will continue to be as the
improvements have been so great.
It all began with New Era Dianetics. When I look back and remember the
hundreds and even thousands of hours some people spent on Book One
Dianetics, it's like an old story half-remembered. If one of those 1950
auditors had the tools of NED they would have been bug-eyed at its fast
results. Even the 1968 Dianetic auditor would have been incredulous if his
preclears had responded with the speed that NED pcs are achieving. It's
probably about 100 to 1.
But, the 1950-1968 auditors as auditors might even have objected a
little bit to NED as it would have run them out of pcs. The overall cost of
1950-1977 processing, despite being cheaper per hour, was much more
expensive.
Take a Drug Rundown. These used to go on for hundreds of hours and
somebody said they would have cost many thousands of dollars to complete.
But with NED Drug Rundowns, they go off zip, zip, zip in one or two
intensives.
NED is so fast that even an incomplete old DRD can be finished up and
repaired and ended utterly in less than one intensive. You would be amazed
how fast and thorough it is. So it isn't the cost by hour or by intensive;
it's how much the whole rundown costs that counts and if it can be given in
far fewer hours it is cheaper no matter the cost per hour.
NED is cleaning up anything and everything Book One ever mentioned with
lightning speed. Of course, when somebody goes Dianetic Clear, he can't be
run on more engrams. right? Right! So it's forbidden now to run NED on
Dianetic Clears.
The main problem of good auditors today is hitting such tremendous wins on
pcs that they have to wait 2 or 3 days for the F/N to die down-if it does.
Auditors are getting sore legs from just walking in and out of sessions.
It's awful.
We are making Clears these days in many cases so fast that Clearing
Course bracelet numbers are jumping up by the thousands per month. We are
also finding that some old Dianetic pcs had gone Clear and the auditors
didn't notice. Incredibly enough, sometimes on a next life basis we are
running into Dianetic Clears from 1949 and '50 so even those auditors were
better than they thought they were. So we're not only making new ones we're
finding old ones-such is the power of NED.
There have been technical improvements and discoveries and advances in
'78 that are reaching into every level of tech and speeding it up.
The following is just a partial list:
(Key:
* means the action can be done on a non-Clear or on a Dianetic Clear.
** means the action is for OT III and above only.
+ means it is a new rundown/action.)
DISCOVERIES AND ADVANCEMENTS
IN TECH IN 1978
1. NED. (New Era Dianetics). A refinement of all previous Dianetic
techniques from 1950 up to present time as well as the development of new
technique giving much faster results and far higher gain per hour of
auditing and speedy resolution of Dianetic cases.
Included in NED are twelve brand new developments. They are all
contained in far more detail in the NED HCOBs and packs. Due to the
extensive changes and improvements in Dianetics, old Dianetic auditors are
also training on the NED Course as it only takes 3 weeks for the able
student.
A. PREASSESSMENT. With the new preassessment tech developed for NED, each
illness or condition the pc needs and wants handled gets handled with a new
technique.
B. NEW DRUG RUNDOWN. This is the answer to a druggy's dreams. Without
withdrawal symptoms and in a no pain, no strain rocket ride, he comes right
back up to life and living.
Where the old DRD took hundreds of hours and sometimes had to be
repeated. the NED DRD requires only a few intensives that are a joy all the
way according to the avalanches of success stories which poured in on me
from over the world during the pilots.
With a good NED trained auditor. the cost of a final, finished,
completed Drug Rundown has shrunk way below what it did and far below the
habit. The Mafia. Drug Enforcement Agency and other criminals hate it, as
it's doing them out of a job. Enlightened foreign governments liked
Narconon but boy they'll love it now. Indeed, the dead will walk again.
C. END OF ENDLESS DRUG RUNDOWNS REPAIR LIST. A lot of people who have had
Drug Rundowns old style and have had to have them repeated will be over
joyed to know that they can be finished with rapidity. In fact with new
developments, a repair list can be finished off so fast that the rundown
has to be sold on the basis of one intensive. This applies only to getting
a C/S 53 and the repair list and is done only on those people who have
"completed" an old Drug Rundown and does not apply to the
NED new rundown in Section B above. If it takes more, that's too bad for
the org. If one wants to get his old Drug Rundown handled terminatedly he
should ask for the End of Endless DRD Repair List. (Demand a "C/S 53" to
begin it and then get the repair.)
D. OBJECTIVE ARC. This brand new process introduces the pc to the wide,
bright world .
E. SWEAT PROGRAM. Some of these new drugs, like the intelligence drug, LSD
(developed to poison and paralyze whole cities) or Angel Dust (developed by
crooked gamblers to handle race horses and fix races) have a nasty habit of
remaining in the body and popping up unexpectantly to send people on
"trips." The Sweat Program has been refined to handle this. It is pretty
strenuous-but so is a traffic accident when an unexpected "trip" happens.
Everyone who has had the courage to go on a Sweat Program and stay with it
has come up bright as a gold nugget.
F. POSTULATE OFF AS THE EP OF A DIANETIC CHAIN. The discovery that some old
Dianetic auditors had not been actually completing a chain to the correct
end phenomena of getting a postulate off opened the door to a lot of
residual gain. Pcs with mean reputations keep right on being mean until
they get the postulate off.
G. RELIEF RUNDOWN. This handles the losses that push people into the
despair and shadows of life and wipes away the tears of the ages.
H. DIANETIC STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE. Those who find study difficult will
be delighted with this one. The slow student turns into a blur of absorbed
new knowledge .
I. PREPARED ASSESSMENT FORM. This NED process list dredges up the unwanted
conditions that wait in the future so they can be handled before they hit
the pc.
J. IDENTITY RUNDOWN. Freud said that people who are detached and to whom
things are unreal could never be handled. This one makes him wrong and the
pc right.
K. DISABILITY RUNDOWN. To a pc, disability can take many guises, anything
from an inability to talk to girls to being unable to speak Arabic. We have
a way to handle this now and it works.
L. DIANETIC REMEDIES. The Dianetic remedies formerly in use in Dianetics
have been refined and expanded with New Era Dianetics tech. They're used
where the pc is having trouble with secondaries or engrams and speed up the
already swift potentials of NED for the pc who might bog on it.
2. SUPER POWER. A super fantastic, but confidential series of rundowns
that can be done on anyone whether Dianetic Clear or not that puts the
person into fantastic shape unleashing the super power of a thetan. This is
the means that puts Scientologists into a new realm of ability enabling
them to create the New World. It puts world Clearing within reach in the
future. This is a parallel rundown to Power in Saint Hills which is taken
by the Dianetic Clear. It consists of 12 separate high power rundowns which
are brand new and enter realms of the tech never before approached. Power
is still very much in use on the Grade Chart but is for those who didn't go
Clear on Dianetics. Super Power will be delivered at Saint Hills within the
next 6 weeks as we are right now super grooming the Super Power auditors in
a special international course. It will be delivered in almost all
languages.
The New World Corps is being formed and trained this very minute,
candidates for which must be Class IV, OT IIIs. Orgs were once promised
Power for their staffs.
If org staff are very, very good and get on policy and everything. they
will one day look up and see a New World Corps team move in on them, and
then.... New World Corps mean just that!
3. END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR. Pcs in the past have often had to have their
Interiorization Rundown repaired and sometimes more than once. This repair.
found while researching upper levels finalizes any seemingly endless redo
of interiorization repairs. Pcs on the pilot actions of this have been
ecstatic with relief.
4. NEW INTERIORIZATION RUNDOWN. When a pc exteriorizes during
processing, he can thereafter find it difficult to exteriorize again-to put
it mildly. The new Interiorization Rundown, in good hands, puts a final
finish to any such trouble and the pc ceases to have any trouble because of
exteriorization or in exteriorizing.
5. DIANETIC CLEARS. Undoubtedly the BIG news that resounded around the
world in '78 was the huge numbers of people who were discovered to have
made Dianetic Clear. In 1950 and on, people used to ask "Where are all the
Clears?" Well, they were right there! In 1978 I discovered that it was
deadly to go on running Dianetics on a Dianetic Clear. Such gave the
semblance of no case gain! (Naturally.) So when I announced that running
Dianetics on a Dianetic Clear was forbidden, people began to look around
and lo and behold they had been making Clears with Dianetics and had been
going right on by it! The pc who had made it wasn't declared Clear and
further Dianetics didn't work on him (naturally). So in 1978, after my
announcement, auditors began to check and listen to the pc and found they
had real Clears all over the place!
Now NED produces far faster gains and many (not all) NED pcs began to
go Clear .
And the Clear numbers have been running up like one of those computers.
Rehabbed and allowed to declare these Dianetic Clears abruptly attained
the full results of Clear!
Excited avalanches of success stories have been pouring in on me for
months in the thousands and from all over the world.
And it's interesting that amongst those found there are a few who went
Clear on Dianetics in their last life-in the 50's! (It's quite a scramble
locating their last life folder and records so they can go on to full OT!)
"Where are the Clears?" There they were!
6. REDEFINITION OF INSTANT READ. Making it easier for auditors to learn
metering and giving pcs vastly increased speed of gains due to higher
accuracy of metering .
7. CLARIFICATION OF CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE. Resulting in faster gain in
a shorter period of time.
8. SERVICE FACSIMILES REVISITED. The early 60's handling of service
facs was revised and overhauled and became the new Grade IV of Scientology
processing.
9. POWER TO FORGIVE. Making it possible for the pc to fully end cycle
on any shame, blame, regret or guilt of the past.
** 10. NED FOR OTs. The discovery and development of techniques by which
the Second Wall of Fire can be overcome.
This consists of 29 fantastic new confidential rundowns, delivered by a
specially trained OT auditor.
The auditors are in training right now from AOs to give NED for OTs to
all those who are OT III and auditors already trained on it are delivering
it at Flag in Flag's new Advanced Org Division 4A.
Some of the miracles of life have been exposed to full view for the first
time ever in NED for OTs. The rave success stories coming from this are the
talk of the auditing world.
** 11. OT VIII. This rundown was developed and will be available to OT
VIIs who have completed their NED for OTs which is a prerequisite for OT
VIII.
12. UPPER LEVELS. There are other OT levels above VIII but these will
be released from time to time when people are ready for them. We're already
higher than Man has ever been and it can get quite stratospheric.
TRAINING
In 1978 giant training strides were made for I was very busy on that as
well. The NED Course was brought down to 3 weeks, Class 0-4 Checksheets
were carefully shortened back to the 1968 level when auditors were being
made at speed but without losing tech which is quite a trick when you come
to think of it!
When you realize that a large portion of training costs goes into
living expenses while taking the course, reducing the length of time of a
course gives an enormous reduction in course costs. regardless of what's
being charged. Training is also being helped by scholarships.
CLASS IV
AUDITING ACTIONS THAT CAN BE RUN
Class IV Orgs-those orgs which are in major cities on 5 continents-have a
large variety of public services which they can give. Many of these are
very economical and are there for the raw public as well as to keep their
fields getting service. Amongst them are the following:
1. GROUP PROCESSING. After an Intro Lecture a successful gradient for
raw public is being part of a group who are audited simultaneously. Group
Processing can be pretty effective and on a large number of "releases
attained" you will find the public reporting great gains made in group
auditing. It is an economical way to keep one going even after he's had
professional processing.
2. CO-AUDIT. (Cooperative Auditing). A public person is instructed in
the rudiments of auditing and under the supervision of a trained auditor,
groups of teams audit each other, attaining good gains.
+3. LIVINGNESS REPAIR. This is often the first action taken on a person
by a professional auditor and can bring a great deal of brightness back
into his life.
+4. NED. (New Era Dianetics). This was the bombshell of '78 and NED
auditors (as well as courses) are available in every org.
NED consists of at least 12 separate rundowns as noted in the New
Discovery section above. It occasionally makes a Dianetic Clear although
this must not be promised. The only "trouble" with NED compared to earlier
Dianetics is that it produces results very fast. One can achieve more
result per hour of auditing time by about 100 to 1 over old Dianetics and
when you realize that old Dianetics was the first and remains the only fast
and effective processing known to Man you get some idea of where NED is at.
It is interesting that when somebody has been skillfully mucking himself up
for trillions and trillions of years that a NED auditor can salvage him in
under 100 hours!
+ 5. XDN. {Expanded Dianetics). In '78 improvements on this were
undertaken and the full new Expanded Dianetics is being released in '79. It
comprises very specialized applications of Dianetics for the more difficult
case.
* 6. QUAD GRADES AND EXPANDED GRADES 0-IV. These are more fully
covered in the book What is Scientology? They are the wonder workers which
put ability to live back into life. They handle the basics of relationships
amongst people and improve one's ability to handle himself and others. For
Dianetic Clears, this is usually their first auditing (less the engram
running R3RA part of New Grade IV) after attaining Clear and permits them
to expand beyond their previously barriered existence. These grades are
very far from limited to Clears.
+ 7. NEW GRADE IV. Grade IV has been improved enormously by including
and refining formerly Class VI materials. The engram running part cannot be
run on Clears but the listing processes can. It is guaranteed to make the
preclear fully and completely right.
+ 8. REVISED C/S 53. It is quite a technical achievement to put on one
side of one sheet of paper everything that can be wrong with a mind. The
"C/S" stands for Case Supervisor who is the one, unseen in some Ivory
Tower, who tells the auditor exactly what to do between sessions when
you're getting audited. This is a primary tool he uses in analysis. In '78
it was polished up and made as bright as the morning star to detect and
handle things you didn't even know were wrong but which might have you
totally caved in.
+ 9. GREEN FORM. This tool of case analysis has been improved.
+ 10. NEW GREEN FORM 4() EXPANDED. This detects and handles any reason
why a case might be resistive to processing, thus handling any tendency
towards slow gain and making it possible for such cases to make faster
gains in future processing.
+* 11. STUDY GREEN FORM. This is a rundown which isolates and handles
anything that could be wrong with any student or pupil.
* 12. STUDENT CORRECTION LIST. This handles difficulties that a student
or pupil may have encountered in his studies and frees him up from these.
so that he can now study easily.
* 13. NEW METHOD ONE WORD CLEARING. This is far more reaching in
clearing up past misunderstoods which stuck the person in previously failed
subjects he studied .
14. CONDITIONS AND EXCHANGE BY DYNAMICS. This is an auditing action
which increases the awareness of exchange and flows on the various
dynamics, enabling a person to be at cause over them.
+* 15. THE MARRIAGE INTENSIVE. This is where husbands and wives handle
marital difficulties, enabling them to lead happily married lives. It can
restore the bloom of spring romance!
+* 16. AUDITOR RUNDOWN. This is an intensive which fully handles any
case reasons why an auditor might have difficulty and enables him to move
forward without any losses or failures from past efforts to help people
stopping him.
+* 17. TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR INTENSIVE. This is for any person involved
in teaching or supervising or education and enables him to become a vastly
better teacher or supervisor.
+* 18. EXECUTIVE OR BUSINESSMAN'S INTENSIVE. This enables an executive
or businessman to face situations of stress with calmness and frees him
from past business stresses.
+* 19. MONEY PROCESSING INTENSIVE. This handles the inability to have
money resulting in the ability to increase income.
+* 20. PROFESSION INTENSIVE. This enables a person to overcome
difficulties that he may encounter in his profession or in any given
subject.
+* 21. FIXATED PERSON RUNDOWN. This enables a person to overcome the
condition of having his attention fixated on one person.
+* 22. SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN. This is a magical rundown just now
being released to Class IV and other orgs. It utilizes a principle found in
an early ACC but never fully developed and released till '78 that one could
bring the suppressive in a person's life to communicate to him and seek
peace, without ever contacting him. When expertly done on a person who has
been the target of suppression by antagonistic people it brings him back to
freedom and handles his environment as well. When one realizes that most
illness is precipitated by suppression one can understand the need and use
of such a miraculous rundown. It's unbelievable until one experiences it.
The way to get processing cheaply is, of course, to take the training
route and get trained and make your grades at the same time. Training is
very fast these days due to the new checksheets.
Class IV Orgs teach the Co-Audit Auditors Course, the fast New Era
Dianetics Course, the NED Validated Auditor Internship, the NED Case
Supervisor Course, the Validated NED Case Supervisor Internship, now have
all the shorter checksheets for and teach Class 0-IV, the Permanent Class
IV Auditor Internship, the Class IV Graduate Auditor and Case Supervisor
Course, the Permanent Class IV Graduate Case Supervisor Internship and will
teach Expanded Dianetics Auditor and Case Supervisor courses and
internships. They also teach a considerable number of public courses, lists
of which will shortly be available from Class IV Orgs as in 1978 Department
17 was ordered to get busy handling and training the public as the pre-wave
of the New World.
CLASS VI ORGS (SAINT HILLS)
The original Class VI Org was located in a beautiful English estate,
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex. When a Class VI Org was formed in
Copenhagen to service Europe in all languages it was staffed by people from
Saint Hill who named it, of course, "Saint Hill." And when the American
Class VI Organization was formed it was staffed by people taken from Saint
Hill and, of course, they called it The American Saint Hill Organization.
The services remain the same in each of the organizations .
The following services are given at Saint Hill Orgs:
1. ALL CLASS IV ORG AUDITING ACTIONS AND COURSES. They cost a bit more
but the Saint Hills are essentially training orgs and the auditing
delivered there is usually quickly available and very well done.
2. POWER PROCESSING. Grades V and VA are still available and being
delivered at Saint Hills for persons who did not make Dianetic Clear,
delivered only by Class VII auditors who are specialized on it. Power
continues to produce its startling results.
+* 3. SUPER POWER. There is no reason a Dianetic Clear should be denied
the powerful gains which research made available in '78 (see above). For
the public who have gone Dianetic Clear, and those who haven't, Saint Hills
will become a mecca where they obtain the most excellent results obtainable
in Super Power.
The SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE still roars on. This is the
place where the auditor gets all the tech that has ever been issued below
that level, this is where his sessions are video'd and polished, this is
where he gets all his auditing to catch him up on his grades. These are the
Dukes of the auditor elite, the Saint Hillers. One joins the clique only by
hard work and great results.
CLASS VIII COURSE. This is the course originated on Flag and still taught
in its original successful form at Saint Hills. It is a standard tech
course and Class VIIIs pride themselves on keeping tech standard over the
world.
CLASS IX COURSE. This is the graduate course which contains the
materials issued since the Flag Class VIII.
ADVANCED ORGS
Advanced Orgs are located in Los Angeles, England and Copenhagen.
The Advanced Orgs are the OT (Operating Thetan) orgs of the world.
Because of the nature of OT auditing the person has to learn to audit
himself as most OT levels are too fast to be audited by another (only OT
VII, OT IV and NED for OTs are audited on the pre-OT by a professional).
* 1. SET-UPS. It often happens that one needs to have case difficulties
handled before he goes on up the Grade Chart to the stellar realms of the
Advanced Orgs. Sometimes a Drug Rundown isn't complete or one is a bit
suppressed or too introverted. It saves time to get a set up before
starting the rocket ride up the top end of the Grade Chart. The AOs handle
this sort of thing routinely when it is needed. They have a checklist of
prerequisites for AO levels and this is what they're most interested in
getting completed. To not complete it means a stall somewhere along the
way. It usually doesn't take much time and saves time later.
* 2. SOLO AUDITORS COURSE. The AOs are the place where the preclear or
Dianetic Clear learns to solo audit so he can go on up the Grade Chart.
Some people, wanting the best auditing they can get for this Solo flight,
also take lower level professional auditor courses and even Class VI at the
Saint Hills. At one time a Dianetic Auditors Course was a prerequisite to
AO services prior to the Solo Auditors Course and while this is not now
demanded, and while the Solo Auditors Course is very good, smart preclears
and smart Dianetic Clears take other courses before they get to an AO and
then they're sure to make OT even more easily. I've heard Solo auditors say
that they only wanted a professional on their case and that's why they were
making themselves into one before they went to an AO. Even Class IV Orgs
have professional courses .
3. R6EW. This is the tech designation of the step a non-Dianetic
Clear must take before going onto the Clearing Course in Advanced Orgs. It
is Grade VI. It returns powers to act on one's own determinism. It
incidentally tells one why the human race often reacts so oddly to life.
+* 4. DIANETIC CLEAR REHAB. The state of Dianetic Clear is checked and
rehabilitated which is a very fast action in most cases. It has to be
verified because if the person didn't make it he has to go onto the
Clearing Course and if he did really make Dianetic Clear, to do the
Clearing Course would be disastrous because, of course, he's already Clear.
This is why AOs are now engaged on a project of recovering folder libraries
particularly of the few pcs who have died in the last few decades. Always
bring your own folder or get it sent to the AO if you are going.
5. THE CLEARING COURSE. This was one of the most famous breakthroughs
of all time requiring years of research. Those who did not make Dianetic
Clear solo audit themselves to the full bursting glory of Clear.
* 6. OPERATING THETAN I. For the Dianetic Clear who has had his Solo
Course, set-up and verification as Clear, this is the first solo auditing
step. These OT grades have their own end phenomena but they are
confidential.
* 7. OT II.
* 8. OT III. This is the big step and one has to allow time for it.
** 9. OT III EXPANDED.
** 10. OT VII. This is an auditing step by a professional OT auditor.
It can be given in any sequence after OT III and before OT VIII.
+** 11. NED FOR OTs. This is the big news of the OT world. AO auditors
were specially trained at Flag and are just now on their way back to AOs to
deliver it. I he new Division 4A Flag is an AO now and had its gala opening
and its first avalanche of pre-OTs on December 16. There is very wild
excitement on the results of NED for OTs as, of course, they've never been
seen before on this or any other planet. NED for OTs can be given any time
after OT III and before OT VIII and is a prerequisite for OT VIII.
** 12. OT IV.
** 13. OT V.
** 14. OT VI.
** 15. OT VIII. Although several upper OT grades have been researched,
pre-OTs were not ready for them and so they were not released. The needed
link which makes it possible is NED for OTs which is its prerequisite. The
upper levels above VIII will probably be released from time to time into
the future. OT VIII's release is a real cap for the tech breakthroughs of
'78.
FLAG SHIP ORG
The FSO is beginning its third year at the Flag Land Base in
Clearwater, Florida. The FSO was several years afloat and has a long
tradition as the top training and processing org of the world. Its quarters
in the posh Fort Harrison Resort Hotel still carry its distinctly nautical
flavor.
Flag is the top tech org of the world and if they can't do it, nobody
can.
What you pay for at Flag is the most expert C/Sing for the best
rundowns by the best auditors in the world.
Its services are:
1. ALL LEVELS AND RUNDOWNS. NED, CLASS IV, CLASS VI, CLASS Vial and
all AO services (in its new Division 4A) as listed above are delivered at
Flag. (Super Power will be delivered to the staff first and eventually to
the public.) (Flag lower org services cost more mainly because they are
even more expert and faster than they are in lower orgs and because the
service is highly personalized.)
*** 2. FULL CASE RESOLUTION. It is always the fate of the top level org
of the world to inherit the rough and "unsolvable" cases. Flag runs on the
basis of results or else so far as their tech stuff is concerned. The words
"failed case" do not exist on Flag. Therefore they have rundowns and
handlings to untangle the most tangled and get it going again. (Flag gets
easy cases too. In fact they get some of the easiest and fastest cases in
the world because such people have a way of making it through to the top.)
*** 3. INTEGRITY PROCESSING. These are a series of processes which result
in a vastly improved performance in the area addressed.
* 4. STUDENT BOOSTER RUNDOWN. This is a specialty on Flag which also
trains the executives of orgs and has to have a fast study remedy. It is
also given to business executives so that they can absorb effortlessly and
with greater speed the vast quantities of data that pass across an
executive's desk.
5. DIANETIC DEBUG AND REPAIR. Those who couldn't handle and run
engrams or have trouble in Dianetics find this a successful way to start
winning with Dianetics or NED.
*** 6. OT LEVEL DEBUG AND REPAIR. This is the full repair and resolution
of any difficulties a pre-OT may have encountered due to solo auditing
errors on any solo level .
7. NEW VITALITY RUNDOWN (NVRD). This was also called the "Special
Rundown" when it was being developed in '75 and I trained a group of
auditors on it at Flag. It has never been exported from Flag. It handled
cases that had not progressed well due to suppression or other factors.
8. POWER REPAIR AND COMPLETION TO FULL EP. Given in those rare cases
where a pc has not made it on Power.
*** 9. L-10. This is the first of the famous Ls ("L" is just the
technical designation). The L's are at Flag only. They are not grades in
themselves but incredible boosters that can be delivered at any point after
a completed DRD and Expanded Grades. The L's are audited by Class X, XI and
XII auditors who are the most highly trained on the planet.
*** 10. L-11. The next step from L-10.
*** 11. L-12. When I was C/Sing the L's I would never let a pre-OT leave
the ship unless he'd gone exterior with full perceptions and was able to
maintain it.
+** 12. NED FOR OTs. Flag was the place where all the NED for OT auditors
were trained. When its new AO Division 4A was opened just before Christmas
even other hotels in town had to be booked to take care of the OTs arriving
for their NED for OTs. The sensation caused over the world rivalled the
original landing at Flag in Florida. They considered it a Christmas present
and it was.
13. ALL AO LEVELS.
14. OT VIII.
Flag teaches a large variety of courses for auditors and is the place
where top auditors go to become fully proficient in all classes.
Administrative courses at Flag are much sought after by top executives
in businesses and other walks of life. It is a mark of considerable
distinction to be known as a graduate of a Flag Executive Briefing Course.
In all, Flag teaches 69 courses which are fitted for the special
requirements of the Flag clientele.
The International Training Org. for org personnel only, is also located
at Flag and org staffs who are lucky enough to be selected to it are
trained for executive positions in orgs. It received a new expansion at the
end of '78 and was put under the command of one of the Sea Org's most
veteran Officers.
________
1978
Man is a complex being, far more complex than he ever conceived. And he
possesses abilities and potentials that neither he nor any of the wise men
of the ages ever dreamed of.
In 1978, a great many new insights and revelations about life were
disclosed, many of them discovered in my research at very upper levels.
These then were used to speed up the lower and more fundamental grades.
Without discarding any of the tech we already had, all of which remains
very valid, the time and cost for a given result was greatly reduced.
And, as demand for auditors far exceeded supply, new training skills were
also developed and the checksheets which govern the time in training were
also reduced so that good auditors could be made FAST! A lot of 1978 time
was spent on doing this.
But there was one discovery in '78 that I haven't said very much about
and am really not likely to since it is a sad thing. It is what really
happens to a thetan who is not salvaged or processed and goes on down the
route. Man, when I saw that and knew it to be true I actually felt sorry
for these guys that try to hit at us. Poor devils. Some religions talk
about hell. It's an understatement of what really happens. I got a real
close look at what we were salvaging people from. Well, we can do it,
better than ever today, especially with these newest discoveries.
All this developmental work was done in '78 despite the fact that I
also spent several months of that year directing, photographing, lighting-
you name it-nine bright sparkling training films! They are now in the
process of being edited and you'll be hearing much more about them when
they begin to be released later on in '79.
In case you are under the mistaken impression that Scientology was
bruised in 1978 you should know that raw public bought and are buying
Scientology texts in a wave of best selling that is making history in the
retail and publishing world. There has never before been such a boom in any
specialized organization's books. Book publishers use us as an astonishing
example of what can happen. Hordes of new public are sweeping these books
out of the stores and in the better run orgs, are crowding the Public
Division to the rafters for service. Truth doesn't bruise very easily.
New books also got attention in '78. HAVE YOU LIVED BEFORE THIS LIFE?
was introduced at the Atlanta Book Fair and, in the hands of retail
distributors, began its own boom. It has gone 5X the normal best seller and
is still going. (After all. we discovered past lives.)
And bright, new, and in your bookstore is a big impressive hard cover
book WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY? released at Christmas! It contains all kinds of
data, really a huge handbook, just the thing to use to inform and overawe
your friends. 347 information packed pages plus over a hundred big full
color illustrations contain the answers to just about every question ever
asked about Scientology. Although staff wrote it, I had to keep it rounded
up and to the printer and many a day was spent in tropic heat getting its
photographs shot. There is data in it that hardly any Scientologist knows.
It's a reference and reading total must for every Scientologist's library.
And, incidentally, it's about half the price. despite its quality, of
regular bookstore books of the same size-a triumph in itself in these
inflationary times!
In '78 a lot of time was spent in developing the new Mark VI E-Meter.
It was needed as OTs were going off the top of the Mark V. The New World
Corps is equipped with the specially built Mark VI. This beautiful and far
more sensitive meter will be available to general auditors around February
'79 from Pubs Orgs. The Mark V will continue to be valid and sold as it's a
good meter and less expensive. The Mark VI is just a Rolls Royce.
Needless to say, I was very busy this year!
It sure is a lot of work to dig out a planet!
Well, there it is. All yours-for '79.
Love,
RON
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 DECEMBER 1978
Remimeo
Cl IV Grad
Checksheet
Class VI
Checksheet
C/Ss
Class IV Grad
Auditors
Ethics Officers
THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
A MAGICAL NEW RUNDOWN
At times the results of "ordinary" Scientology tech are extremely
impressive, even to me. I am by this time, quite accustomed to miracles as
usual, but magic is not quite so commonplace an occurrence, even these
days, and is worthy of special note.
Many times the suppressive person to whom the pc is PTS exists in
present time and is still capable of causing trouble or upset for the pc.
It is to this situation that the Suppressed Person Rundown is addressed.
This new rundown, the Suppressed Person Rundown, produces the wondrous
result of changing the disposition of an antagonistic terminal at a
distance, by auditing the PTS preclear. Where this terminal was
antagonistic, invalidative, hostile or downright suppressive, he will
suddenly have a change of heart and seek to make peace with the PTS pc.
This rundown is not considered complete until the magic occurs; that is
on this rundown, we take a PTS pc and we audit this pc and audit him and
audit him on Problems Processes until a major change occurs in the
antagonistic persons universe which prompts him to make a friendly overture
to or concerning the pc.
This friendly and unprompted origination or attempt at origination from
the antagonistic terminal to or concerning the pc will occur in all cases
if Problems Processes are run and are fully flattened. This happens no
matter how out of comm the two terminals have been or what length of time
has intervened between their last communication .
The rundown is continued until the EP occurs. Each problem process is
run to its own EP.
When the PTS Rundown engram running has to be omitted because of Clear
or OT this Suppressed Person Rundown can be substituted for the engram part
of the PTS Rundown but if so, it is still run to the full EP of the
Suppressed Person Rundown .
This is how it works. The pc, due to some act or acts previously
committed, has gone the effect of the antagonistic terminal. The terminal
then attempts to suppress the pc. The pc, already the effect of the
terminal becomes the effect of the suppression. So the pc's own postulate
to improve himself and his conditions is countered by the suppressive
terminal's counter-postulate, and he is thus given a present time problem
of sufficient magnitude to prevent case gain, as only a present time
problem will halt the progress of a case. To the present time problem are
added ARC breaks with the antagonistic terminal, and as only ARC breaks
will worsen a case, the result is no gain or deterioration of a case by
reason of the suppressive connection in the environment .
A possible simple explanation for what occurs is: the pc, on running
Problems Processes, comes up to cause on his problems with the terminal and
when he is con
tinued on problems, he will break through and actually run out the
antagonistic terminal's problems which he has given to him.
When this occurs, the formerly antagonistic terminal will get into
communication with the pc or by communicating in a friendly way to others
about the pc. He will write a letter to make peace, or he will make a phone
call to say "All is well," or he will tell Aunt Sally he feels much better
about the pc and has decided to let bygones be bygones. It sometimes occurs
that the antago person does not know where the pc is but he will still try
to communicate.
This friendly origination by the antagonistic terminal is the EP of the
rundown. If the terminal hasn't yet originated, you haven't run enough
Problems Processes. THE ONLY TIME THIS DOESN'T WORK IS WHEN YOU HAVEN'T RUN
ALL POSSIBLE PROBLEMS PROCESSES OR HAVE RUN THEM WITH OUT-TECH SUCH AS A
BROKEN METER.
WHEN THE RUNDOWN IS DONE
The Suppressed Person Rundown is done after the education step laid out
in HCOB 31 Dec 78 III EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST
STEP TOWARD HANDLING: PTS C/S-1, and after a PTS interview or a 10 August
interview or an S&D has located the antagonistic terminal and handlings on
that terminal have been done, and after the PTS Rundown has been done.
This procedure is run on the antagonistic terminal in all instances,
even when the PTS scene has apparently been relieved for the pc on earlier
PTS handling. Always run this problems procedure, no matter how successful
earlier handlings were. This RD is to repair the relationship.
The pc is given the R-Factor to let the auditor know of any
communication he receives from or about the antagonistic terminal. (He
should not, however, be told what the EP of the rundown is.)
HOW THE RUNDOWN IS DONE
The Problems Processes used in the Suppressed Person Rundown are given
in HCOB 30 Dec 78 SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN-PROBLEMS PROCESSES and are run
Triple or Quad Flow in the order they are given. Each flow is checked for a
read before running and each charged flow is taken to the EP of F/N, cog,
VGIs.
The EP of the rundown has been reached when the antagonistic terminal
originates in a friendly way to the preclear or seeks to communicate to the
pc in a friendly manner. It's not just a cessation of hostilities, it's
more than that. Even if the antagonistic terminal doesn't know the pc's
address he will find out, or he will put word out and the pc will hear from
or about the antagonistic terminal. And it will be a friendly message. Even
if the antagonistic terminal doesn't know the pc's address, news will reach
the pc that the antagonistic terminal wishes bygones to be bygones. That is
the EP you are aiming for, and you continue to audit Problems Processes on
the pc on the antagonistic terminal until that occurs.
It is very important not to underrun the rundown. Some auditors will be
tempted to end off the rundown because the pc has had a major win or
ability regained or some such. When the pc has had a major win, you would
of course let him have his win and would leave him off auditing until the
persistent F/N dies down, but you do not accept as the EP of the rundown
anything other than the formerly antagonistic terminal originating, with no
coaxing, in a friendly way to or about the pc. You keep running problems
until the EP is attained. You do want to see the magic, don't you? And the
only way this rundown can fail is by not continuing to run Problems
Processes until this EP is attained.
WHO THE RUNDOWN CAN BE DONE ON
The Suppressed Person Rundown can be done on any PTS person of any case
level. It is run with good success on Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears as
well as pcs just beginning their auditing. The only requirement is that any
pc who receives the rundown must first have received the PTS C/S-1 per HCOB
31 Dec 78 III and must, if previously unindoctrinated, have been educated
into the procedures of Scientology auditing by a Scientology C/S-1 per HCOB
15 Jul 78 SCIENTOLOGY AUDITING C/S-1.
And of course, like any other auditing, it is done with the pc's
rudiments in.
AUDITOR AND C/S NOTE
One of the many advantages of the Suppressed Person Rundown is its
simplicity. There are very few places where it can go off the rails. This
rundown does, however, require expert metering and very standard handling,
and the C/S should be alert to the following:
1) The auditor must realize that the target of this rundown is not
just the pc; the target is the antagonistic terminal the pc is
connected to. And the EP is not just a change in the pc, but a
change in the antagonistic terminal of a positive, friendly
communication to the pc. The auditor and C/S must realize that the
above is the target and EP for this rundown.
2) ALL Problems Processes must be run on the antagonistic
terminal, and failure to run enough Problems Processes is the only
thing that will prevent this rundown from working.
3) METERING. The auditor who does this rundown must be skilled at
metering so he doesn't miss reads and fail to run reading flows or
attempt to run unreading flows. Imprecise metering can undermine
the results of the rundown as the running of all charged flows on
problems is vital. The auditor must be able to read a meter and
must take instant reads which occur instantly on calling the
command. (Reference: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS)
4) EPs. Each reading flow of each Problems Process must be taken
to its full EP which is cog, F/N and VGIs. The C/S should ensure
that the processes are indeed taken to EP and should suspect, if
there is trouble attaining the rundown EP, that one or more
Problems Processes have been left underrun, unflat or unrun.
Some auditors may say they've done the rundown and the pc's in
beautiful shape and he's had tremendous gains and now the Suppressed Person
Rundown is complete.
Your answer to this is: "Finish the rundown. Continue until the
terminal gets in touch with the pc to make peace." And sure enough, a day
or two or three later the pc, in utter amazement, will report that her
sister, who hasn't spoken to her for 10 years has just sent her an
affectionate letter or that his father, who disowned him when he got into
Scientology, has just called to say "Hello" and that they had a great chat,
just like old times.
It always happens when Problems Processes are fully run.
So there you have it, the Suppressed Person Rundown, quite an amazing
magical feat, and very easily achieved with good standard auditing. Use it
well and fully and you'll get smashing one-for-one successes on PTS pcs.
LRH:jk L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1978 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 DECEMBER 1978R
REVISED 6 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Checksheet (Revisions not printed in a different type style)
Class VI
Checksheet
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
Auditors
SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
PROBLEMS PROCESSES
References:
HCOB 29 Dec 78 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
PAB 84 15 May 56 THE REASON WHY
HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
HCOB 20 Aug 58 PRESENT TIME PROBLEM-RUNNING OF
PAB 126 15 Dec 57 PROBLEMS: HANDLING AND RUNNING
This bulletin contains the Problems Processes to be run on the
Suppressed Person Rundown .
DEFINITION OF PROBLEM
The first and most vital action to begin the Suppressed Person Rundown
is to fully clear PROBLEM with the pc as a problem. not as a condition or
situation.
THE WAR OF PURPOSES GIVES US WHAT WE CALL PROBLEMS. A PROBLEM HAS THE
ANATOMY OF PURPOSES. A PROBLEM CONSISTS OF TWO OR MORE PURPOSES OPPOSED. IT
DOES NOT MATTER WHAT PROBLEM YOU FACE OR HAVE FACED, THE BASIC ANATOMY OF
THAT PROBLEM IS PURPOSE-COUNTER-PURPOSE.
THE DEFINITION OF A PROBLEM IS INTENTION VERSUS INTENTION OR TWO OR
MORE OPPOSING AND CONFLICTING VIEWS ON THE SAME SUBJECT.
The dominant operating action of this rundown is knowing what a problem
is. Without the auditor feeding the pc a cog, he must clear the definition
of problem with the pc so that it is fully understood and the pc can easily
make up examples of problems. You'll get no place on the rundown unless
both auditor and pc understand what a problem is.
Running problems comes under a gradient scale of confront and can go on
and on before the pc gets up to an awareness of anything.
It's really a fascinating phenomenon. The person is being harassed all
over the place by something or somebody and he will eventually name it and
identify it, which is an achievement right there, but when you first start
to run problems on it, you'll find he does not have anything to do with it.
It's all by itself, floating out in space someplace. The problem has
nothing to do with him or anything else.
Example:
Auditor: "Tell me a problem with your mother."
Pc: "She's never home."
"She's never home" is not a problem. A problem is two-terminaled. The
problem, as the pc has given it in the example above, does not contain
anything live. It's just a condition. But gradually, as Problems Processes
are run, he will come up to an actual statement that the problem is
something that has to be solved and that it has something to do with him.
Now we're getting someplace!
PROBLEMS PROCESSES
The processes are taken up in the order they are given. Each flow of
each process is checked for a read before running it. using the name of the
terminal antagonistic to the pc. Each flow taken up is then run to the EP
of cognition, F/N and VGIs.
A copy of this process sheet is placed in the folder of the pc being
run on the Suppressed Person Rundown and the flows of each process run are
initialed and dated by the auditor when they have been taken to a full EP.
END PHENOMENA
THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN IS TAKEN TO THE EP OF A FRIENDLY AND
UNPROMPTED ORIGINATION TO OR ABOUT THE PC BY THE ANTAGONISTIC TERMINAL.
This EP will occur when enough Problems Processes have been fully run
on that terminal. The auditor's metering must be excellent, as to miss
reads and leave charged flows unrun can prevent the pc from attaining the
EP of this rundown.
(Reference: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS
HCOB 3 Dec 78 UNREADING FLOWS)
If the pc has a big win, end off the session and let him have his win.
Do not try to audit over a persistent floating needle or you will end up
leaving charged flows unhandled due to the "needle having floated all the
way through them." So give the pc some time off auditing to let him have
his win, then resume his sessions so he can be taken to the full and
magical EP of this rundown.
THE ONLY TIME THIS RUNDOWN DOESN'T WORK IS WHEN YOU HAVEN'T FULLY RUN
ALL POSSIBLE PROBLEMS PROCESSES.
1. Ref: CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY R2-34
F1: Can you recall a problem about (terminal) which concerned you?
How did it seem to you then?
How does it seem to you now?
Can you recall another problem about (terminal) which concerned you?
(Continue, using the above commands) to EP____
F2: Can you recall a problem (terminal) has had with you which
concerned him?
How did it seem to him then?
How does it seem to him now'!
Can you recall another problem (terminal) has had with you which
concerned him?
(Continue, using the above commands) to EP____
F3: Can you recall a problem others have had with (terminal) which
concerned them?
How did it seem to them then?
How does it seem to them now?
Can you recall another problem others have had with (terminal) which
concerned them?
(Continue. using the above commands) to EP____
F3A: Can you recall a problem (terminal) has had with others which
concerned him?
How did it seem to him then?
How does it seem to him now?
Can you recall another problem (terminal) has had with others which
concerned him?
(Continue, using the above commands) to EP____
F0: Can you recall a problem you have had with yourself because of
(terminal) which concerned you?
How did it seem to you then?
How does it seem to you now?
Can you recall another problem you have had with yourself because of
(terminal) which concerned you?
(Continue, using the above commands) to EP____
II. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: Tell me your problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem could you confront? to EP____
F2: Tell me (terminal's) problem with you.
What part of that problem could he confront? to EP____
F3: Tell me others' problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem could they confront? to EP____
F3A: Tell me (terminal's) problem with others.
What part of that problem could he confront? to EP____
F0: Tell me your problem with yourself because of (terminal).
What part of that problem could you confront? to EP____
III. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: What problem about (terminal) could you confront? to
EP____
F2: What problem about you could (terminal) confront? to EP____
F3: What problem about (terminal) could others confront? to
EP____
F3A: What problem about others could (terminal) confront? to EP____
F0: What problem about yourself concerning (terminal) could you
confront? to EP____
IV. Ref: HCOB 6 Jul 61 ROUTINE 1A
To be run as a bracket (1-10, 1-10, 1-10, etc. to EP).
1. What problem about (terminal) could you confront?
2. What problem about (terminal) don't you have to confront?
3. What problem about you should (terminal) confront?
4. What problem about you wouldn't (terminal) confront?
5. What problem about (terminal) should others confront?
6. What problem about (terminal) wouldn't others confront?
7. What problem about others should (terminal) confront?
8. What problem about others wouldn't (terminal) confront?
9. What problem about yourself concerning (terminal) could you
confront?
10. What problem about yourself concerning (terminal) don't you
have to confront? to EP____
Note: What problem about (terminal) could others confront? (or What
problem about others could (terminal) confront can be used instead of
should whichever checks out on the meter) .
V. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: What two things about (terminal) can you confront? to
EP____
F2: What two things about you can (terminal) confront? to
EP____
F3: What two things about (terminal) can others confront? to
EP____
F3A: What two things about others can (terminal) confront? to
EP____
F0: What two things about yourself concerning (terminal) can you
confront? to EP____
VI. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: Tell me your problem with (terminal).
How does it seem to you now?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F2: Tell me (terminal's) problem with you.
How does it seem to him now?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F3: Tell me others' problem with (terminal).
How does it seem to them now?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F3A: Tell me (terminal's) problem with others.
How does it seem to him now?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F0: Tell me your problem with yourself because of (terminal).
How does it seem to you now?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
VII. Ref: HCOB 19 Nov 65 PROBLEMS PROCESS
F1: What problem have you had with (terminal)?
What solutions have you had for that problem?
(One gets the pc to give his problem then runs TA off solutions.
Then a new statement of the problem and more questions about
solutions.) to EP____
F2: What problem has (terminal) had with you?
What solutions has he had for that problem? to EP____
F3: What problem have others had with (terminal)?
What solutions have they had for that problem? to EP____
F3A: What problem has (terminal) had with others?
What solutions has he had for that problem? to EP____
F0: What problem have you had with yourself because of (terminal)?
What solutions have you had for that problem? to EP____
VIII. Ref: HCOB 19 Jan 61 ADDITIONAL HAS PROCESSES
F1: Get the idea of solving a problem with (terminal).
Get the idea of not solving a problem with (terminal). to EP____
F2: Get the idea of (terminal) solving a problem with you.
Get the idea of (terminal) not solving a problem with you. to
EP____
F3: Get the idea of others solving a problem with (terminal).
Get the idea of others not solving a problem with (terminal). to
EP____
F3A: Get the idea of (terminal) solving a problem with others.
Get the idea of (terminal) not solving a problem with others. to
EP____
F0: Get the idea of solving a problem with yourself about
(terminal).
Get the idea of not solving a problem with yourself about
(terminal). to EP____
IX. Ref: CREATlON OF HUMAN ABILITY R2-71
F1: Give me some answers concerning (terminal). to EP____
F2: Give me some answers for (terminal) concerning you. to
EP____
F3: Give me some answers for others concerning (terminal). to
EP____
F3A: Give me some answers for (terminal) concerning others. to
EP____
F0: Give me some answers for yourself concerning (terminal). to
EP____
X. Ref: HCOB 3 May 59 SOLUTION TO SOLUTIONS
F1: What solution could you make stick about (terminal)? to
EP____
F2: What solution could (terminal) make stick about you? to
EP____
F3: What solution could others make stick about (terminal)? to
EP____
F3A: What solution could (terminal) make stick about others? to
EP____
F0: What solution about yourself concerning (terminal) could
you make stick? to EP____
XI. Ref: HCOB 14 Sep 61 NEW RUDIMENTS COMMANDS
F1: Find out if the pc has a reading problem with (terminal).
If so, run:
Tell me what is unknown about that problem with (terminal). to
EP____
F2: Find out if there is a reading problem (terminal) has with the
pc. If so, run:
Tell me what is unknown to (terminal) about that problem with you. to
EP____
F3: Find out if there is a reading problem that others have with
(terminal). If so, run:
Tell me what is unknown to others about that problem with (terminal
). to EP____
F3A: Find out if there is a reading problem that (terminal) has with
others. If so, run:
Tell me what is unknown to (terminal) about that problem with others.
to EP____
F0: Find out if the pc has a reading problem with himself because
of (terminal). If so. run:
Tell me what is unknown about that problem with yourself. to
EP____
XII. Ref: HCOB 7 Sep 64 II PPS, OVERTS AND ARC BREAKS
F1: Tell me something you don't know about (terminal). to
EP____
F2: Tell me something (terminal) doesn't know about you. to
EP____
F3: Tell me something others don't know about (terminal). to
EP____
F3A: Tell me something (terminal) doesn't know about others. to
EP____
F0: Tell me something you don't know about yourself because
of (terminal). to EP____
XIII. Ref: HCOB 24 Feb 59 TECHNICAL BULLETIN
HCOB 3 Jul 59 GENERAL INFORMATION
Run Selected Person Overt Withhold Straightwire on the terminal.
F1: Think of something (terminal) has done to you.
Think of something (terminal) has withheld from you. to EP____
F2: Think of something you have done to (terminal).
Think of something you have withheld from (terminal). to EP____
F3: Think of something others have done to (terminal).
Think of something others have withheld from (terminal). to
EP____
F3A: Think of something (terminal) has done to others.
Think of something (terminal) has withheld from others. to EP____
F0: Think of something you have done to yourself because of
(terminal).
Think of something you have withheld from yourself because of
(terminal). to EP____
XIV. Ref: HCOB 15 Oct 58 ACC CLEAR PROCEDURE
F1: Tell me your problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem could you be responsible for?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F2: Tell me (terminal's) problem with you.
What part of that problem could he be responsible for?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F3: Tell me others' problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem could they be responsible for?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F3A: Tell me (terminal's) problem with others.
What part of that problem could he be responsible for?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
F0: Tell me your problem with yourself because of (terminal).
What part of that problem could you be responsible for?
Alternate repetitive to EP____
XV. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: What motion of yours has (terminal) been responsible for? to
EP____
F2: What motion of (terminal's) have you been responsible for? to
EP____
F3: What motion of (terminal's) have others been responsible
for? to EP____
F3A: What motion of others' has (terminal) been responsible for? to
EP____
F0: What motion of your own regarding (terminal) have you
been responsible for? to EP____
XVI. Ref: HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
F1: Tell me your problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem have you been responsible for? to
EP____
F2: Tell me (terminal's) problem with you.
What part of that problem has he/she been responsible for? to
EP____
F3: Tell me others' problem with (terminal).
What part of that problem have they been responsible for? to EP____
F3A: Tell me (terminal's) problem with others.
What part of that problem has he/she been responsible for? to
EP____
F0: Tell me your problem with yourself because of (terminal).
What part of that problem have you been responsible for? to
EP____
XVII. Ref: PAB 42 24 Dec 54 SIX BASIC PROCESSES
F1: What kind of problems could you have with (terminal)? to
EP____
F2: What kind of problems could (terminal) have with you? to
EP____
F3: What kind of problems could others have with (terminal)? to
EP____
F3A: What kind of problems could (terminal) have with others? to
EP____
F0: What kind of problems could you have with yourself
because of (terminal)? to EP____
XVIII. Ref: PAB 88 12 Jun 56 THE CONDITIONS OF AUDITING
F1: What problem could (terminal) be to you? to EP____
F2: What problem could you be to (terminal) ? to EP____
F3: What problem could (terminal) be to others? to EP____
F3A: What problem could others be to (terminal)? to EP____
F0: What problem could you be to yourself because of
(terminal)? to EP____
XIX. Ref: HCOB 17 Mar 60 STANDARDIZED SESSIONS
F1: Tell me a problem (terminal) would be a solution to. to
EP____
F2: Tell me a problem for (terminal) that you would be a
solution to. to EP____
F3: Tell me a problem for others that (terminal) would be
a solution to. to EP____
F3A: Tell me a problem for (terminal) that others would be
a solution to. to EP____
F0: Tell me a problem concerning (terminal) you yourself
would be a solution to. to EP____
XX. Ref: CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY page 51-R2-20
F1: What kind of a problem could (terminal) be to you?
Could he be that problem?
Can you see yourself figuring on it?
Give me another problem (terminal) could be to you.
Can he be that problem? and so on to EP____
F2: What kind of a problem could you be to (terminal)?
Can you be that problem?
Can you see (terminal) figuring on it?
Give me another problem you could be to (terminal).
Can you be that problem? and so on to EP____
F3: What kind of a problem could (terminal) be to others?
Can (terminal) be that problem?
Can you see others figuring on it?
Give me another problem (terminal) could be to others.
Can (terminal) be that problem? and so on to EP____
F3A: What kind of a problem could others be to (terminal)?
Can others be that problem?
Can you see (terminal) figuring on it?
Give me another problem others could be to (terminal).
Can others be that problem? and so on to EP____
F0: What kind of a problem could you be to yourself because of
(terminal)?
Can you be that problem?
Can you see yourself figuring on it?
Give me another problem you could be to yourself because of
(terminal).
Can you be that problem? and so on to EP____
(XI. Repeat same process, using solutions, as follows:
F1: What kind of a solution could (terminal) be to you?
Could he be that solution?
Can you see yourself figuring on it?
Give me another solution (terminal) could be to you.
Can he be that solution? and so on to EP____
F2: What kind of a solution could you be to (terminal)?
Can you be that solution?
Can you see (terminal) figuring on it?
Give me another solution you could be to (terminal).
Can you be that solution? and so on to EP____
F3: What kind of a solution could (terminal) be to others?
Can (terminal) be that solution?
Can you see others figuring on it?
Give me another solution (terminal) could be to others.
Can (terminal) be that solution? and so on to EP____
F3A: What kind of a solution could others be to (terminal)?
Can others be that solution?
Can you see (terminal) figuring on it?
Give me another solution others could be to (terminal).
Can others be that solution? and so on to EP____
F0: What kind of a solution could you be to yourself because of
(terminal)?
Can you be that solution?
Can you see yourself figuring on it?
Give me another solution you could be to yourself because of
(terminal).
Can you be that solution? and so on to EP____
XXII. Ref: CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY R1-11
F1: What kind of a problem can (terminal) be to you in
havingness?
What kind of a problem can (terminal) be to you in not havingness? to
EP____
F2: What kind of a problem can you be to (terminal) in havingness?
What kind of a problem can you be to (terminal) in not havingness? to
EP____
F3: What kind of a problem can (terminal) be to others in
havingness?
What kind of a problem can (terminal) be to others in not havingness?
to EP____
F3A: What kind of a problem can others be to (terminal) in havingness?
What kind of a problem can others be to (terminal) in not havingness?
to EP____
F0: What kind of a problem concerning (terminal) can you be to
yourself in havingness?
What kind of a problem concerning (terminal) can you be to yourself
in not havingness? to EP____
XXIII. Repeat same process using solutions as follows:
F1: What kind of a solution to havingness can (terminal) be to you?
What kind of a solution to not havingness can (terminal) be to you?
to EP____
F2: What kind of a solution to havingness can you be to (terminal)?
What kind of a solution to not havingness can you be to (terminal)?
to EP____
F3: What kind of a solution to havingness can (terminal) be to
others?
What kind of a solution to not havingness can (terminal) be to
others? to EP____
F3A: What kind of a solution to havingness can others be to (terminal)?
What kind of a solution to not havingness can others be to
(terminal)? to EP____
F0: What kind of a solution to havingness concerning (terminal) can
you be to yourself?
What kind of a solution to not havingness concerning (terminal) can
you be to yourself? to EP____
XXIV. Ref: CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY R2-20
Have the pc pick out or pick up a room object. have him examine this
object until he is sure it is real.
F1: What problems could this object be to you because of
(terminal)? to EP____
F2: What problems could this object be to (terminal) because of
you? to EP____
F3: What problems could this object be to others because of
(terminal)? to EP____
F3A: What problems could this object be to (terminal) because of
others? to EP____
F0: What problems could you cause yourself over this object because
of (terminal)? to EP____
On each flow the command is run repetitively until the pc is
convinced that he can create problems at will.
XXV. Ref: HCOB 7 Sep 64 II PPS, OVERTS AND ARC BREAKS
F1: Do you have a problem with (terminal)?
What communication have you left incomplete about that problem? to
EP____
F2: Does (terminal) have a problem with you?
What communication has he left incomplete about that problem? to
EP____
F3: Do others have a problem with (terminal)?
What communication have they left incomplete about that problem? to
EP____
F3A: Does (terminal) have a problem with others?
What communication has he left incomplete about that problem? to
EP____
F0: Do you have a problem with yourself because of (terminal)?
What communication have you left incomplete with yourself about that
problem? to EP____
XXVI. Ref: HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES
F1: From where could (terminal) communicate to you? to EP____
F2: From where could you communicate to (terminal)? to EP____
F3: From where could others communicate to (terminal)? to
EP____
F3A: From where could (terminal) communicate to others? to EP____
F0: From where could you communicate to yourself concerning
(terminal)? to EP____
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 DECEMBER 1978
Issue II
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Class VI
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
Auditors
Ethics Officers
OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING
PTS situations can arise at any time during a person's Scientology
auditing or training program and must be handled speedily and well to get
the person back on his course of auditing or training. Many preclears new
to Scientology require PTS handling as one of their first actions.
Auditing or training must not be continued over an unhandled PTS sit as
processing or study under the duress of suppression will not produce
results.
You do not go on hoping or ignore it or call it something else or do
any other action except handle. Handling PTSness is too easy to allow for
any justification or excuse for not doing so, and the steps given below lay
out the many handlings which can be used to bring about a full resolution
of all PTSness in all pcs.
EDUCATION
A person who is PTS is often the last person to suspect it. He may have
become temporarily or momentarily so. And he may have become so very
slightly. Or he may be even PTS and have been so for a long time. But he is
nevertheless PTS and we must educate him into the subject.
PTS C/S-1
The PTS C/S-1, given in HCOB 31 Dec 78 III EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL
TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST STEP TOWARD HANDLING: PTS C/S-1 must be done
before any other PTS handling is begun.
This action sets a person up to understand his PTS sit and the
mechanics of it. A thorough PTS C/S-1 is the basis of all successful PTS
handling.
PTS INTERVIEW
A metered PTS interview per HCOB 24 Apr 72 1, C/S Series 79, PTS
INTERVIEWS or a "10 August handling" per HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING done
by an auditor in session or an MAA, D of P or SSO will, in most cases,
assist the person to spot the antagonistic or SP element. Once spotted, the
potential trouble source can be assisted in working out a handling for that
terminal, or more rarely, in deciding to disconnect from that person.
(If all difficulty is encountered on this step, or if the SP cannot
easily be found. the preclear or student is probably not PTS Type I and
should be turned over to an auditor qualified to handle Type II PTS
situations with more advanced PTS tech.)
HANDLING
Once the antagonistic terminal has been located, a handling is done to
move the PTS person from effect to slight gentle cause over his situation.
This handling will include whatever is needed to accomplish the result, and
will, of course, vary depending on the person and his circumstances.
A good roads, good weather approach to the antagonistic terminal is
usually what is needed. The handling must be agreed upon by the potential
trouble source and the
person assisting him and must be tailored to put the person at cause over
his particular situation.
Handling may include coaching him along to see how he himself actually
precipitated the PTS condition in the first place by not applying or by
misapplying Scientology basics to his life and relationship with the now
antagonistic terminal, per BPL 5 Apr 72RC PTS TYPE A HANDLING.
(Additional references:
HCOB 10 Aug 73. PTS HANDLING
HCOB 24 Apr 72 1, C/S Series 79, PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
PROBLEMS OF WORK. Chapter 6, Affinity, Reality and Communication
BTB 11 Nov 77 Reiss. 10 Dec 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS.)
WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?
It quite often happens that the persons antagonistic to the preclear
have no real concept of what Scientology is. This can also be true of a
very new Scientologist who then misinforms others.
The book WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY? is a very useful tool. The preclear can
send a copy of it to persons antagonistic to him and it will give them hope
that the person will respond better to life or if they are antagonistic to
Scientology can show them what they're being antagonistic to.
Recommendations that the PTS person obtain and use this book (or anyone
else who wants to inform his friends or get them on the right road, as the
book was not written for the purpose of de-PTSing people) should be made by
the interviewing officer. The book was specially priced so it would be more
generally available despite the high cost of publishing. It is a large and
imposing book and contains the true answers to all the questions people
might ask and so saves the PTS person or any other person a great deal of
explanation time.
It is quite a formidable weapon when used in that fashion besides being
a good book that Scientologists should own in its own right.
CAN WE EVER BE FRIENDS?
Extraordinary successes in handling PTS situations with the Can We Ever
Be Friends? cassette and booklet occur when these are used. Parents,
friends, relatives of Scientologists, who, due to misunderstoods or
misinformation thought they were opposed to Scientology and its aims have
discovered, after listening to this cassette, that they are in full
agreement with it and now give Scientology their support. This action is
vital and must not be omitted.
The results available with this cassette cannot be underestimated. It
can be used by itself when communication has really broken down between the
two terminals or in conjunction with other PTS handling.
PROGRAM
As a result of interview and the various actions connected with it as
given above and in the referenced issues the interviewer must give the
person a program to be done by the person. If the person does not do the
program or report his actions on it, or the program results in no real
change in the situation the interviewing officer must require the person to
have auditing on the subject. (Ruds can be flown and/or a PTS RD must be
given by a qualified auditor in the HGC.)
Clears and OTs can have ruds flown and can do all the PTS RD except
engram handling.
This is usually followed by a Suppressed Person RD.
RUDIMENTS
Flying ruds and overts Triple or Quad Flow on the antagonistic terminal
is often done to "get ruds in" and enable the pc to better confront the PTS
situation he is faced with. This would of course, be done only in session
by a qualified auditor when so ordered by the Case Supervisor.
THE PTS RUNDOWN
The PTS Rundown is done when preclears who have had standard,
successful PTS handlings roller-coaster at a later date, become ill, slump
after making gains, or continue to find additional terminals they are PTS
to.
The PTS Rundown handles a more expanded sector of a pc's PTSness and is
run to the end phenomena of a pc who is getting and keeping case gains and
never again roller-coasters.
Note: Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears are not run on the Dianetic
section of the PTS Rundown.
References:
HCOB 9 Dec 71 RC Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN
HCOB 20 Jan 72R Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN ADDITION
HCOB 17 Apr 72, C/S Series 76, C/SING A PTS RUNDOWN
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP
SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
This rundown is beautifully simple and magically effective. It can be
done with great success on all PTS persons of any case level, from those
just beginning their first auditing to Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears.
The end phenomena of this handling is a miraculous restoration of
communication between the estranged terminals originated by the formerly
antagonistic person. (Reference: HCOB 29 Dec 78 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON
RUNDOWN)
REST, QUIET AND A SAFE ENVIRONMENT
Rest. quiet and a safe environment must be provided for a person who
has become PTS Type Three.
"In this case, the Type Two's apparent SP is spread all over the world
and is often more than all the people there are-for the person sometimes
has ghosts about him or demons and they are just more apparent SPs but
imaginary as beings as well."
". . . Removed from apparent SPs, kept in a quiet surroundings, not
pestered or threatened or put in fear, the person comes up to Type Two and
a Search and Discovery should end the matter."
(HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY)
These are powerful and precision tools. With them we can handle our PTS
students, preclears and staffs and get resounding one-for-one successes.
I am counting on you to do this.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:clh
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 DECEMBER 1978
Issue III
Word Clearers
HCO
Tech/Qual
C/Ses
PTS/SP Detection.
Routing and
Handling Course
Ethics Officers
Class IV Grad
EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE,
THE FIRST STEP TOWARD HANDLING:
PTS C/S-1
References:
BPL 5 Apr 72RC I PTS TYPE A HANDLING
Rev. 29.12.78
BTB 11 Nov 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
HCOB 24 Apr 72 I C/S Series 79
EXDN Series 5
PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING
HCOB 27 Sep 6h THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY
THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST
HCOB 28 Nov 7() C/S Series 22
PSYCHOSIS
HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
HCOB 12 Mar 6X MISTAKES, ANATOMY OF
HCOB 9 Nov h7 REVIEW AUDITORS, BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES-
REVISION OF REMEDY A. REMEDY B
AND S AND Ds
HCOB 5 Feb 66 III S AND D WARNING
HCOB 9 Dec 71 RC PTS RUNDOWN. AUDITED
Rev. 8.12.78
HCOB 20 Jan 72R PTS RUNDOWN ADDITION
Rev. 8.12.78
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RUNDOWN. FINAL STEP
Rev. 8.12.78
HCOB 29 Dec 78 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN
HCOB 30 Dec 78 SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN-PROBLEMS
PROCESSES
HCOB 31 Dec 78 11 OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING
When you find you have a potential trouble source on your hands the
very first thing you must do is educate him on the fundamentals of PTS/SP
tech.
Do not begin any other PTS handling on any PTS person until he has
completed the basic education steps of the PTS C/S-1 given in this HCOB.
In the absence of education into the basics of PTS tech you will have
PTS students and pcs asserting they're not PTS, you will have upsets.
protest, recurrences of "once handled" PTSness. PTSes will not cognite,
will not take action to handle the antagonistic terminal, will not recover.
Failure to educate simply doesn't work. So a very thorough job must be done
at this point to guarantee the success of any PTS handlings which follow.
Now people and circumstances and PTS sits vary, and you may wish to
carry the education steps of the PTS person beyond what is given here
before you begin any other handling on him. I will leave that to your
educated judgment. However, the steps of the PTS C/S-1 given in this HCOB
must be done on all PTS students and pcs before any sort of PTS Interview
or 10 August handling or any PTS auditing is undertaken.
The person should, of course, study the complete PTS/SP Detection,
Routing and Handling Course so that he understands the full mechanics that
had been upsetting his life, but the PTS C/S-1 will give sufficient data
and understanding so that he or she can begin handling the PTS scene.
PTS C/S-1
The following PTS C/S-1 is not a long action and can and should be
accomplished speedily. Its purpose is to give to any PTS student or pc the
necessary data and RFactor on the basics of PTS/SP tech so that he
understands and is able and willing to successfully handle his PTS
situation. It can be done by an auditor, in session, or in the course room
under the supervision of the Word Clearer and Course Supervisor.
Note: Some pcs and students who have been trained or who have in the
past received PTS handling may protest that they know the terms and issues.
If this happens acknowledge with excellent TRs and without invalidation or
evaluation and tell them that this action is intended to make PTS handling
effective for all and is a required step of the handling. If the auditor or
Word Clearer uses excellent TRs and a good R-Factor, no ARC breaks will
occur and the person will have tremendous wins.
The auditor or Word Clearer should be fully familiar with this issue as
well as all issues in the PTS/SP Course pack. He will need to take a very
thorough look at what has to be covered with the pc in this C/S-1 and know
his materials very well and have them ready for reference and clearing any
misunderstoods or questions the pc may have.
The following will be needed:
Technical Dictionary
Admin Dictionary
A good English Dictionary
A good dictionary in the pc or student's native language, and for a
foreign language case a dual dictionary (English-to-foreign language and
foreign language itself).
PTS and SP Definitions Sheet-Attachment No. I of this issue
Demo kit
A. Have the pc define each term, using the reference. (Note: you don't
ask: "Do you know what this word means?" You ask: "What is the
definition of ?"
When the pc has told you the definition, have him give you a sentence
or two using the term correctly. Where it applies, have him give you
examples, using his experiences or those of others. Have him demo with
a demo kit. Cover by exact definition all terms used and take each term
defined to an F/N.
B. Check for any questions (or misunderstoods) as you go along and
ensure any such get handled so the pc or student winds up with a clear
understanding of the word.
Don't settle for glibness that does not show understanding, but on
the other hand, don't overrun or put duress on the pc or student,
either.
Ensure each word cleared is taken to F/N.
PTS C/S- 1 PROCEDURE
1. Give the R-Factor that you are going to clear the basic words and
concepts concerning PTSness.
2. Clear the word AFFINITY. Have the pc or student demo its meaning.
3. Clear the word REALITY. Have the pc or student give you sentences and
examples showing his understanding.
4. Clear the word COMMUNICATION. Have the pc or student demo its
meaning.
5. Clear ARC BREAK. Have the pc or student demo what an ARC break is.
6. Clear PROBLEM. Have the pc or student demo a problem.
7. Clear WITHHOLD. Have the pc or student give you an example of a
withhold.
8. Clear MISSED WITHHOLD. Have the pc or student demo a missed withhold.
9. Clear POSTULATE. Ask the pc or student if he's ever postulated
anything. Have him tell you about it.
10. Clear COUNTER (the prefix).
11. Have the pc or student demo several examples of a postulate and a
counter-postu late.
12. Clear HOSTILE. ANTAGONISM.
13. Clear SUPPRESS. Have the pc Or student demo several different
examples of how someone or something could be suppressed.
14. Clear SUPPRESSION. Have the pc or student give you examples of
suppression from movies he's seen or books he's read or suppression
he's seen or experienced.
15. Clear SUPPRESSIVE PERSON. Have the pc or student demo the
definitions.
16. Clear SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS.
17. Clear ROLLER-COASTER. Have the pc or student demo roller-coaster. Ask
him if he's ever been around anyone who roller-coastered. Let him tell
you about it briefly if he wishes.
18. Clear POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE (PTS). Have the pc or student demo
this well.
(If this step is being done by a Word Clearer in the course room, end
off at this point and send the pc or student to the Examiner. Then, get
him started on the Study Section. If being done in session, the auditor
may continue with the Study Section. )
STUDY SECTION
19. The following issues are to be read by the PTS student or pc, word
cleared Method 4 and starrated. This may be done in a course room,
under the supervision of the Course Supervisor or in session with an
auditor.
HCOB 27 Sep 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY
THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST
HCOB 28 Nov 70 C/S Series 22
PSYCHOSIS
HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
HCOB 12 Mar 68 MISTAKES, ANATOMY OF
BPL 5 Apr 72RC I PTS TYPE A HANDLING
Rev. 29.12.78
BTB 11 Nov 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS
HCOB 24 Apr 72 I C/S Series 79
EXDN Series 5
PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS HANDLING
20. End off and send the pc or student to the Examiner. Route the pc's
folder with all worksheets to the C/S who will examine them for
thoroughness and completeness and then order the person's next step.
___________
Educating a PTS person is the key to putting him at cause over the PTS
sit. Do this PTS C/S-1 thoroughly and well. It is not to be considered a
substitute for the full PTS/SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course, but
will set up the PTS student or pc for a highly successful PTS handling.
These you get him signed up for the course.
PTS tech is highly effective and powerful. Get the most out of it by
applying it properly, with EDUCATION as the first step.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCOB 31.12.78 III
ATTACHMENT
PTS C/S-1
DEFINITIONS SHEET
AFFINITY
Degree of liking or affection or lack of it. Affinity is a tolerance of
distance. A great affinity would be a tolerance of or liking of close
proximity. A lack of affinity would be an intolerance of or dislike of
close proximity. Affinity is one of the components of understanding; the
other components being reality and communication.
(Diabetics Today, Glossary, page 1013)
REALITY
The degree of agreement reached by two ends of a communication line. In
essence, it is the degree of duplication achieved between cause and effect.
That which is real is real simply because it is agreed upon, and for no
other reason.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, page 338)
COMMUNICATION
"The interchange of ideas or objects between two people or terminals. More
precisely the definition of communication is the consideration and action
of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a distance to
receipt point, with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt
point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the
source point." "The formula of communication is: Cause, Distance, Effect,
with Intention, Attention and Duplication with Understanding."
"Communication by definition does not need to be two-way. Communication is
one of the component parts of understanding."
Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 81)
(HCOB 5 Apr 73 Reiss. 19 Sep 74 AXIOM 28 AMENDED)
(Dianetics Today. Glossary, page 1020)
ARC BREAK
A sudden drop or cutting of one's affinity, reality, or communication with
someone or something. Upsets with people or things come about because of a
lessening or sundering of affinity, reality, or communication or
understanding. It's called an ARC break instead of an upset, because, if
one discovers which of the three points of understanding have been cut, one
can bring about a rapid recovery in the person's state of mind. It is
pronounced by its letters A-R-C break.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 21)
PROBLEM
Anything which has opposing sides of equal force; especially postulate-
counterpostulate, intention-counter-intention or idea-counter-idea; and
intention-counterintention that worries the preclear
(Dianetics Today Glossary, page 1034)
OVERT
1. ... An aggressive or destructive act by the individual against one or
more of the eight dynamics (self, family, group, mankind, animals or
plants, mest, life or the infinite) .
(Dianetics Today. Glossary, page 1032)
2. That thing which you do which you aren't willing to have happen to
you.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 288)
WITHHOLD
An undisclosed harmful (contra-survival) act.
(Dianetics Today. Glossary, page 1043)
MISSED WITHHOLD
An undisclosed contra-survival act which has been restimulated by another
but not disclosed. This is a withhold which another person nearly found out
about, leaving the person with the withhold in a state of wondering whether
his hidden deed is known or not.
(Dianetics Today. Glossary, page 1030)
POSTULATE
1. To conclude, decide or resolve a problem or to set a pattern for the
future or to nullify a pattern of the past.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 304)
2. That self-determined thought which starts, stops or changes past,
present or future efforts.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 304)
3. In Scientology the word postulate means to cause a thinkingness or
consideration. It is a specially applied word and is defined as
causative thinkingness.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 304)
COUNTER
1. Opposition, as in direction or purpose; for example countermarch,
counteract.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language page 303)
HOSTILE
1. Of or pertaining to an enemy.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. page 637)
2. Feeling or showing enmity; antagonistic.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. page 637)
ANTAGONISM
1. Mutual resistance; opposition; hostility.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. page 55)
2. The condition of being an opposing principle, force or factor.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language page 55)
SUPPRESS
1. To squash, to sit on, to make smaller, to refuse to let reach, to
make uncertain about his reaching, to render or lessen in any way
possible by any means possible. to the harm of the individual and for
the fancied protection of a suppressor.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 414)
SUPPRESSION
1. Suppression is "a harmful intention or action against which one
cannot fight back." Thus when one can do anything about it, it is less
suppressive.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 414)
SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
1. A person with certain behavior characteristics and who suppresses
other people in his vicinity and those other people when he suppresses
them become PTS or potential trouble sources.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 415)
2. A person who has had a counter-postulate to the pc you are handling.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 415)
3. Is one that actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientology or a
Scientologist by suppressive acts.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 415)
SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS
1. Are defined as those which seek to destroy Scientology or which
specialize in injuring or killing persons or damaging their cases or
which advocate suppression of mankind.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 414)
ROLLER-COASTER
1. A case that betters and worsens. A roller-coaster is always connected
to a suppressive person and will not get steady gains until the
suppressive is found on the case or the basic suppressive person
earlier. Because the case doesn't get well he or she is a potential
trouble source to us, to others and to himself.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, page 358)
2. Gets better, gets worse, gets better, gets worse.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, page 358)
POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE
1. Somebody who is connected with an SP who is invalidating him, his
beingness, his processing, his life.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 305)
2. It means someone connected to a person or a group opposed to
Scientology. It is a technical thing. It results in illness and roller-
coaster and is the cause of illness and roller-coaster.
(Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary page 305)
3. The PTS guy is fairly obvious. He's here, he's way up today and he's
way down tomorrow and he gets a beautiful session and then he gets
terribly ill. That's the history of his life.
(Modern Management Technology Defined page 400)
4. The mechanism of PTS is environmental menace that keeps something
continually keyed-in. This can be a constant recurring somatic or
continual, recurring pressure or a mass. The menace in the environment
is not imaginary in such extreme cases. The action can be taken to key
it out. But if the environmental menace is actual and persists it will
just key-in again. This gives recurring pressure unrelieved by usual
processing.
(Modern Management Technology Defined page 400)
SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
1. Search and discovery of suppression is called an "S and D." It
locates the suppressive on the case.
(HCOB 9 Nov 67, REVIEW AUDITORS, BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES. REVISION OF
REMEDY A, REMEDY B AND S AND Ds)
"Remember that the real suppressive person (SP) was the one that
wove a dangerous environment around the pc. To find that person is to
open up the pc's present time perception or space. It's like pulling a
wrapping of wool off the pc.
"The SP persuaded or caused the pc to believe the environment was
dangerous and that it was always dangerous and so made the pc pull in
and occupy less space and reach less.
"When the SP is really located and indicated the pc feels this
impulse not to reach diminish and so his space opens up.
"The difference between a safe environment and a dangerous
environment is only that a person is willing to reach and expand in a
safe environment and reaches less and contracts in a dangerous
environment.
"An SP wants the other person to reach less. Sometimes this is done
by forcing the person to reach into danger and get hurt so that the
person will thereafter reach less.
"The SP wants smaller, less powerful beings. The SP thinks that if
another became powerful that one would attack the SP.
"The SP is totally insecure and is battling constantly in covert
ways to make others less powerful and less able."
(HCOB 5 Feb 66 S AND D WARNING)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
HCOB 24 JULY 1970 AND
HCOB 28 AUGUST 1970RA CANCELED
Ref: HCO PL 15 March 1971R
Data Series 21 R
DATA SERIES AUDITING
HCOB 24 July 1970, DATA SERIES, and HCOB 28 August 1970RA, HC OUTPOINT
PLUS-POINT LISTS RA, are CANCELED.
The use of the HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists is most effective when
preceded by other specific actions necessary to achieving the full gains
possible from the handling of these lists.
The HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists are being incorporated as a step of a
rundown currently under research and are slat to be used or audited in any
way otherwise.
After the date of this issue it will he deemed a HIGH CRIME if any
auditor is found to have violated the above.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:elb
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
L. Ron Hubbard
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE
LRH ED 301-1 INT 6 January 1979
To: All Staff
and Students
From: Ron
CORRECTION TO RON'S JOURNAL 30
REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPER POWER AUDITORS
On page 267 of Ron's Journal 30, the listing of OT III as a requirement
for New World Corps candidates to be trained on Super Power is a typo and
is hereby canceled.
The requirements for auditors or C/Ses who are to be trained to deliver
Super Power are:
1. Class IV (does not have to be Class IV Permanent).
2. Not an R/Ser.
3. No LSD or Sweat Out Program very fully completed.
4. Full Drug Rundown completed.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cib
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead. Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
BTB CANCELLATION
BTB to MARCH 75. ISSUE IV
CRAMMING SERIES 5RB
TRs IN CRAMMING
IS HEREBY CANCELED.
No auditor may audit in an HGC who has not done a Hard TRs Course.
Any auditor with good sense will get an honest TRs tape passed by
competent authority before he audits anybody.
The technical material in the above mentioned BTB is incorrect as once
an auditor's TRs are "IN" they don't go out and you certainly don't have to
practice to get them back in.
The job is to get them in in the first place.
Auditors whose TRs are out can have false data on TRs found and be word
cleared on TR HCOBs and can be put back on a Hard TRs Course.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
All Staff
EO/MAA Hats A NEW TYPE OF CRIME
Ref: HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY
WORKING
HCO PL 2.3 Dec 65 SUPPRESSIVE ACTS
SUPPRESSION OF SCIEN
TOLOGY & SCIENTOLOGISTS
-THE FAIR GAME LAW
HCO PL 7 Aug 65 SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF
HCO PL 16 Oct 67 AKH No.16-SUPPRESSIVES
AND THE ADMINISTRATOR-
HOW TO DETECT SPs AS AN
ADMINISTRATOR
HCO PL 18 Oct 67 POLICY AND HCOB ALTERA
TIONS-HIGH CRIME
TECHNICAL PERVERSIONS
During an evaluation of an organization, a new crime came to light:
It consisted of carefully teaching and coaching auditors to get a snap
can squeeze done so they would set their meter sensitivity so low that no
reads could be obtained. It was done knowingly and intentionally by the
person so there would be no auditor around that could spot his withholds.
He also obscured E-Meter Drill No. 5 which shows the correct way to do a
can squeeze and get a proper sensitivity.
Anyone who would do something like this, just to protect a withhold,
without realizing he would also mess up hundreds of cases quite in addition
to messing up his own, is of course not only irresponsible but insane.
We think of "insane people" as being wild-eyed maniacs but such is
seldom the case. More often they are quiet types who have little or nothing
to say and speak softly. This person would not have been seen as insane on
casual observation. And so he had worked his way into the post of training
in charge. Just so he could protect his withholds. And, on that post. then
carefully mistrained all auditors in sight.
So this brings to view that there is a new type of crime:
TO ALTER AND PERVERT TECH OR PROCEDURE TO PREVENT DISCOVERY OF
WITHHOLDS.
This enters many areas: Changing or losing issues. Issuing issues in
BTB or BPL form that contain incorrect and misleading data. Posting known
criminals or incompetents to training posts. Verbal tech. In short, any
action which would prevent tech from being known or correctly used.
These fall under the heading of SUPPRESSIVE ACTS and come under the
ethics PLs related to them.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BDCS:LRH:cib
Copyright � 1979 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
By L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 JANUARY 1979
Issue II
Remimeo
Data Series 47
CANCELLATION
BTB 2 Sept 72R Issue II, WHY FINDING DRILL-TWO, is CANCELED.
The Personal Office of Evaluation and Execution, Cramming Officers, AVC
and any other evaluating activity are not permitted to use this BTB.
This BTB contains false tech and invites verbal tech by the coach who
may or may not already have MUs on the subject of evaluation.
Any entry of this BTB on a checksheet is to be deleted and students
informed of such.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BDCS:LRH:cib
Copyright � 1979 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
By L. Ron Hubbard of the
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
KOTs
C/Ses
Qual Staff C/S QUALIFICATIONS
Tech Staff
HCOs
Any C/S C/Sing for a level for which he has not been trained is subject
to the suspension of all certificates and deprivation of all bonuses. He is
subject also to refund of all bonuses ever obtained while C/Sing as a C/S
levels for which he has not been trained above or below his class. This
does not limit the penalties which can be applied which can include declare
and expulsion.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 JANUARY 1979
Remimeo
TRs Course
Checksheet
TRs Course Supervisor MOOD DRILLS
Tech Sec
Qual Sec
Beings can be fixed or stuck in a chronic mood (emotion)-always sad,
always angry, always bored, etc. Just in life and livingness this makes
them rather hard to live with but in an auditor it is fatal. The mood of an
auditor, particularly if fixed and chronic, can color the session and the
results he obtains.
TRs are a matter of sound, not how an auditor feels. When an auditor
has a stuck or fixated mood, such as monotony, timidity, dullness, showing
up in his TR drills or in session, this can slow up a pc's progress or
rough up or upset a pc. The auditor's TRs should sound live and interested
and natural.
Mood Drills have been developed to handle fixed, uncontrolled or
unsuitable tone levels in an auditor. These drills consist of drilling TR I
over and over at each tone level of the full Tone Scale (HCOB 25 Sept 71RB,
Revised 1 Apr 78 TONE SCALE IN FULL). You start low on the scale and do TRs
at each tone level in that tone. then up to the next tone, and the next,
i.e., TR 1 done over and over at "Dying," then at the tone of "Useless,"
and so on up the scale. The coach simply has the student do TR I at the
particular tone level so that the coach and the student are both satisfied
that the student has conveyed that tone and the student has a win.
A technical fact is that moods or emotions are usually "automatic"
which means they are not necessarily under control but tend to control the
person himself. It is as if he is under other-determinism. Technically, you
can "take over" the automaticity and put it under a being's control just by
having him consciously do it over and over. You can also change a chronic
tone level by shifting a person's attention from it by making him do
something else. (Reference: "Ability 36" and "Ability-Straight Wire.")
Body position, voice tone, facial expression and attitude are all part
of conveying the mood or tone level. For example, the student doing Mood
Drills is on TR 1 working on the tone "Anger." He gives a line from Alice
in Wonderland. and it sounds a bit weak. Coach's patter: "That's it. It
sounds a bit gentle. Let's get some more G-r-r-r-r in it. Start." Student
repeats the line, but smiles a bit although he sounds more angry. Coach:
"That's it. It sounded more angry, but you smiled. Do it again-you feel
angry. Start." Student gives the line again, this time frowning fiercely
and in a very snarly tone of voice, leaning forward aggressively. Coach:
"Good! Do you feel you did it?" Coach continues until the student is
certain he can do it easily. The coach must be able to identify the various
emotions and if he is in question about it the dictionary should be
resorted to until both student and coach are in agreement on what the tone
is or means and that it is being accurately and demonstrably expressed.
A student drilling these must beware of Mis-Us and the coach must make
sure that he and the student both understand each mood (tone). Any moods
that are too easy to do should be spotted by the coach and repeated until
the automaticity is broken.
If a mood is too hard for the student to master, have him do TR 1 in
different beingnesses, e.g., a timid student who is trying to sound
antagonistic could be asked to do TR 1 as a panther, a lion, a villain,
etc. If you had him do it as a timid bird or some such timid thing that
would never be antagonistic you would probably have your student where he
lived. Again, do such things to a student win and don't use it to harass
him. The whole point is to get him to do TR 1 antagonistically. These
shifts of beingness help to shift his attention off a repulsion to an
emotion he cannot easily do.
Once begun, Mood Drills should be continued until the whole scale is flat
so the auditor doesn't get stuck on the Tone Scale but can do any mood
easily and without strain. When an auditor is upset about his voice, you
can have him try speaking melodiously, boringly, enthusiastically, until he
can change his voice mood about at will.
Mood Drills should be done when the auditor sounds mechanical, or his
tone is brush off, not interested or some set emotion. An auditor can be
drilled on assessments in the E-Meter Drill Book with Mood Drills, when his
assessment is dull or monotonous. Any set emotion like "sweet," "light and
airy fairy," or sad, dreary, deadly serious, indifferent can be handled by
drilling with Mood Drills.
50 FOOT MOOD DRILLS
50 Foot Mood Drills can be used to cure a fixed mood that doesn't seem
to budge with regular Mood Drills. Student and coach go to an area where
they can do some shouting without disturbance. The coach and student are at
least 50 feet apart and the Mood Drill is done, as described above, at this
distance.
Mood Drills are not only fun to do, but also enable an auditor to be at
cause over how he sounds in a session, without strain and without his own
feelings interfering with the session and thus to get maximum gain for the
pc.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 FEBRUARY 1979
Issue I
CORRECTED AND REISSUED 8 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
(Also issued as HCO PL same date and title.)
CHANGE THE CIVILIZATION
EVAL
POLICY: A course consists of a checksheet, theory and practical.
To audit or even do courses requires an ability to confront and
communicate and this is brought about on the TRs Course.
People who can't confront can have trouble communicating, reading
meters, studying or even detecting what is going on.
(See Cumulative Index, Vol X Technical Bulletins)
SITUATION: TRs AND TECH ARE OUT INTERNATIONALLY.
STATS: Refunds high .
Majority of Sea Org staff with incomplete courses.
Lots of blown students.
DATA: Auditors pulled in for training couldn't do TRs even though they
were trained and had been auditors for years. (OMITTED TRs-COURSES THEY
TOOK PREVIOUSLY)
Supervisors didn't know key TR HCOBs, didn't know that you cycle a
student through the TRs, not stick him in on one TR for weeks and give him
a lose, yet it is clearly expressed in HCOBs. (OMITTED INFORMATION, WRONG
TARGET-TR SUPERVISORS)
When I teach a course it takes a week or 6 weeks depending on the
course. When it is exported the same course and the same materials can take
up to 9 months. (ADDED TIME-SUPERS)
Auditors who had supposedly been trained misread and missed reads on
meters. (OMITTED CONFRONTS-AUDITORS)
People who go to writing courses in college almost never become
writers. (OMITTED PRODUCTS-COLLEGES)
The common experience of students is they can't do what they're trained
to do after they've been "trained" yet the civilization is spending
countless billions on "education." (CONTRARY FACTS-CONTEMPORARY TEACHERS)
The "service facsimile" which is processed at Grade IV of Scientology
grade processing handles the almost universally present aberration of
making others wrong. (ADDED ABERRATION-TEACHERS)
Few teachers are Grade IV Releases. (OMITTED SCIENTOLOGY- TEACHERS)
Because their TRs and metering were out, auditors have not been producing
uniformly spectacular results and have not been getting pcs smoothly
through their grades. (OMITTED CONFRONT-AUDITORS)
CS-4s who have the responsibility for making up checksheets for courses
continue to export a TRs Course without a checksheet that had to be done
first before doing TRs. (OMITTED CHECKSHEET-CS-4s)
The identical situation of sticking students in at each TR and making
them lose, instead of cycling them through TRs to a win each time was found
on Flag some years. ago and remedied with an HCOB. Yet the HCOB is unknown,
partially because there is no checksheet on the TRs Course. (OMITTED
PRESERVATION OF TECHNOLOGY-FLB)
TR Courses over the world uniformly have been taught without being
preceded by a theory period. (OMITTED THEORY-TRs COURSE SUPERVISORS)
OUTPOINT COUNT:
OMITTED-9 SUPERVISORS-4
WRONG TARGET-1 TEACHERS-3
ADDED-2 AUDITORS-2
CONTRARY FACTS-1 PREVIOUS COURSES-1 COLLEGES-1
CS-4s-1
FLB-1
WHY: THERE IS NO CHECKSHEET FOR THE TRs COURSE WHICH IS STUDIED BEFORE THE
STUDENT DOES HIS TRs.
ETHICS WHY: TARGETTING STUDENTS TOWARD A LOSE BECAUSE THEY ARE DRAMATIZING
THEIR SERVICE FACS.
WHO: MAJORITY OF PROFESSORS, TEACHERS, ETC.
IDEAL SCENE: A TRs COURSE TAUGHT AS A COURSE WITH A PROPER CHECKSHEET AND
SUPERVISED BY SUPERVISORS WHO ARE NOT DRAMATIZING A SERVICE FAC OR MAKING
OTHERS WRONG AND TRAINING AUDITORS WHO CAN CONFRONT AND COMMUNICATE AND IN
ADDITION TO HANDING THEIR PCs SO AS TO OBTAIN UNIFORMLY SPECTACULAR WINS,
MAY ALSO EVENTUALLY REACH THE REST OF THE TEACHERS IN THE WORLD SO THAT
THEY TOO WILL TEACH STUDENTS TO A WIN.
HANDLING:
BRIGHT IDEA: Do a checksheet of the TRs Course and retread all auditors
who are not making it on it and TRs.
1. Compile the checksheet.
LRH TECHNICAL
COMPILATIONS DONE
2. Push all students now on courses on through their courses without
interupting their studies by making them redo the course.
DIRECTORS OF
TRAINING _____
3. Immediately get the checksheet being applied and the TRs Course
redone at the intern level, in the first internship any auditor I/T
enters.
QUAL SECS _____
4. Enforce certificate expiration if the person has not done the
internship for the level he is certified for.
DIRs OF VALIDITY _____
5. Sell the new TRs Course in one internship.
REGS _____
6. Deliver the new TRs Course complete with checksheet and in practical,
cycling through the TRs to a minor win on each instead of sticking the
student into one TR at a time to a completion of that TR and so giving
them countless loses and extending the course endlessly. But make sure
that on the alternate cycle through, they're doing Hard TRs flawlessly.
SUPERS _____
6A. Institute the new TRs Course at the beginning of major courses for
those students who enter a major course in the future, and at the
beginning of any major course substitute the new TRs Course for any
existing TRs Course on the checksheet.
DIRECTORS OF
TRAINING _____
7. Make DRD and Grade IV a prerequisite for the post of Supervisor and
get all Supervisors now on, up to that without removing them from post
in a minimum period of time.
HCO _____
8. On all auditors who are failing order a complete modern TRs Course as
in Targets 5 and 6, as the only acceptable first cramming order. Time
machine it for 2 weeks full time and 6 weeks maximum if done part time.
CRAMMING
OFFICERS _____
8A. Do not require auditors to "drill TRs" in the morning or evening as
TRs do not fall out. Ref: HCOB 9 tan 79, BTB CANCELLATION. Instead, get
them through a Hard TRs Course in their study time.
QUAL SEC _____
9. Where the new TRs Course is not running well, inspect and verify that
Supervisors exist, that this HCOB is known the WHAT IS A COURSE? P/L is
in on the TRs Course or any other reason found and the Supervisors
gotten up to Grade IV Release.
LRH COMM _____
10. Only bother to correct other auditor or admin errors after it's
verified that the persons sent to Cramming have successfully completed
the modern TRs Course to wins on the theory and every TR. When the new
TRs Course is obviously and beyond any reasonable doubt fully passed by
the auditor, only then and in the future for that auditor, engage in
any cramming actions. Do not require that he do the TRs Course again
unless it is clearly evident that he failed it the first time.
CRAMMING
OFFICER _____
11. If this program is not working, if refunds do not drop, if org stats
do not rise, debug this HCOB as it applies to any org or area and get
it in and get it working.
LRH COMM _____
12. Program out how we're going to use this to get this
civilization functioning.
GUARDIAN
WORLDWIDE _____
13. Report all wins and successes with this HCOB to CS-4.
THOSE APPLYING
THIS PROGRAM _____
14. Take ethics actions on those who refuse to apply this program.
EO/SENIOR EO
INT _____
15. Teach students to a win.
EVERYBODY
TRAINING
ANYONE _____
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 FEBRUARY 1979
Issue II
CONFRONT TECH
HAS TO BE PART OF THE TR CHECKSHEET
The inability to confront is basically caused by withholds and where a
person cannot be drilled into confronting, he has to have his withholds
pulled.
That he has committed overts and doesn't want them exposed apparently
causes him to withhold his attention and the result is his ability to
confront is lessened.
Also where a person has overts on a subject and is withholding, he has
a tendency to complicate that subject and cannot get down to its basic
simplicities. The world looks very complicated to him, probably because his
attention is wrapped up in his withholds instead of on his real problems or
the subject.
The new discovery here is that a person who has overts and withholds on
a subject cannot perform in that area and introduces complexities, for of
course they can't confront it.
Where a person cannot take responsibility for his withholds and he is
not benefiting casewise from giving them up, he is half dead as a being. It
is a vicious circle: he began to commit overts because he couldn't confront
things and then withheld what he had done. Because he had withholds and
could not confront, he began to take heavy drugs and alcohol. These pushed
him toward deadness and further worsened his ability to confront and even
caused him to commit further overts which he then withheld and this further
deteriorated his ability to confront. And all this traces back to the fact
that he couldn't confront in the first place. There is nothing more
irresponsible than a dead man. And when confront drops and withholds enter
in, one has entered the death slide as a being.
This vicious circle can be handled in processing at various levels and
will unsnarl and the person will become alive and able to confront. But the
first steps of it, and ones which could carry him well up the ladder, are
the drills of the TR Course if done properly and over and over in rotation
each time to a win on each particular drill.
Truly, the world begins anew by regaining the ability to confront.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 FEBRUARY 1979R
CORRECTED & REISSUED 12 FEBRUARY 1979
REVISED 15 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
All Auditors (Revisions in this type style)
Tech (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Qual
C/Ses
Cramming Officers
E-METER DRILL 5RA
CAN SQUEEZE
The following E-Meter Drill immediately revises and replaces E-Meter
Drill 5, as it appears in The Book of E-Meter Drills and modifies any data
to the contrary in E-Meter Essentials.
NUMBER: EM-5RA
NAME: CAN SQUEEZE
PURPOSE:
I. To demonstrate to the student how an incorrect can squeeze gives an
inaccurate, unreliable needle reaction.
II. To train a student auditor how to get a pc to do an accurate can
squeeze.
III. To train a student auditor how to determine the sensitivity setting
to get 1/3 of a dial drop of the needle on the can squeeze, for use in
setting the correct sensitivity for each preclear in an auditing
session.
IV. To convince a student auditor that he has to use a correct
sensitivity setting for 1/3 of a dial drop of the can squeeze to have a
workable and readable E-Meter.
POSITION: The coach and the student auditor sit facing each other across
a table with an E-Meter facing the student auditor. The E-Meter is already
set up.
TRAINING STRESS:
SECTION 1: To give the student auditor a reality on how a can squeeze can
be done incorrectly. so he will know all the points he may have to correct
to ensure he gets an accurate can squeeze.
1. Coach picks up the cans and holds his hands on the table so the
student can clearly see them.
2. Coach has student set sensitivity booster knob to lowest position and
the sensitivity at I on the sensitivity knob.
3. Coach has student adjust the needle to the set line on the needle
dial.
The coach will have the student readjust the needle to set as
necessary at the beginning of each demonstration of the can squeeze.
4. The coach gives the cans a squeeze with an even pressure. If there is
no read or a very small one, less than an inch, at sensitivity 1, the
student auditor moves the sensitivity knob to 5, and gets another can
squeeze. If still no read or it's smaller than an inch, student moves
sensitivity to 16 and gets another squeeze. For pur
poses of the following demonstration, you want to set the sensitivity
so that you can obviously see a movement of the needle on the can
squeeze of about an inch. So the sensitivity could be set lower than 5
or higher than 5, so long as you get a fall of about an inch on the
squeeze.
5. With the sensitivity setting determined in 4 above, the coach will
then squeeze the cans incorrectly, each time in a different way. The
coach shows the student what particular thing he's doing with his
hands, and then has the student observe what happens on the meter and
the distance the needle falls on the dial when he does each version of
an incorrect can squeeze as follows:
A. Coach holds the cans with cups of palms and all fingers and both
thumbs in complete contact with the cans. As he squeezes the cans, he
lifts one finger off and then puts the finger back on after relaxing
the squeeze. This is an incorrect can squeeze.
B. Coach holds the cans as in A. This time he gives the cans a very fast
light squeeze. This is an incorrect can squeeze.
C. Coach holds the cans as in A, squeezes them with a gradual pressure
and then when he releases the squeeze he relaxes his grip on the cans
so it is much looser than before the can squeeze. This is an incorrect
can squeeze.
D. Coach holds the cans as in A, and this time gives a hard fast
squeeze. This is an incorrect can squeeze.
E. Coach holds the cans as in A, squeezes them firmly and only partially
releases the squeeze. This is an incorrect can squeeze.
F. Coach holds the cans as in A, but gives a squeeze in 2 stages. first
a little squeeze, then suddenly a harder one. This is an incorrect can
squeeze.
G. Coach holds the cans as in A, gives a hard fast squeeze, and holds
the grip. The student should notice that the needle swings way over to
the right due to the sudden motion, and that it returns only part of
the way with the coach still maintaining the squeeze, thus giving an
incorrect measurement of the can squeeze. Student should see that the
distance between the first needle position at set and the final needle
position with the coach still maintaining the squeeze is the actual
measurement of the can squeeze fall. It is not the distance between the
first needle position of set and the needle position at the far swing
to the right. A hard, fast can squeeze is an incorrect can squeeze.
H. Coach holds the cans so they are not in contact with the cups of his
palms and squeezes them. This is an incorrect can squeeze.
I. Coach holds the cans with the thumbs going up the sides and sticking
out over the top edge of the cans and squeezes them. This is an
incorrect can squeeze.
J. Coach holds the cans in a fairly tight grip and squeezes the cans.
This is an incorrect can squeeze.
K. Coach holds the cans with the forefingers lifted slightly off and
puts the forefingers on the cans during the squeeze. This is an
incorrect can squeeze.
The drill is continued until the student auditor gets the idea that
an incorrect can squeeze gives inaccurate, unreliable needle reactions.
SECTION II: To give the student auditor a proper idea as to what a
correct can squeeze is, and to train him how to get a correct can squeeze.
1. The following drill should be done first by the coach to
demonstrate to the student auditor what a correct can squeeze is:
A. The coach has the student auditor shake his hands until the
fingers are loose and floppy.
B. Then the coach has the student auditor put his hands on the
table, palms up, exerting no control on his fingers. The student
auditor's fingers will curl in toward the palm.
C. Now the coach simply places the cans in the student auditor's
hands at an angle across the palms. The natural curl of the fingers is
sufficient to hold the cans in place, and the placement of the cans at
an angle ensures that the maximum skin area is touching the cans. The
cups of the student auditor's palms and all the fingers and both thumbs
must be touching the cans. Ensure the thumbs go around the cans and not
up the sides.
D. Now the coach has the student auditor gradually increase the
pressure of his grip on the cans until a light squeeze is achieved, and
then relax it. This is a. correct can squeeze.
E. NOTE: Ensure when the student auditor relaxes his grip that
he does not take a finger or thumb or his palms off the cans. He should
have about the same contact he had at the start as in C above.
2. Having done the above, the coach now has the student auditor do the
drill as follows:
A. Have the coach pick up the cans and keep his hands on the table
so the student can see them throughout the can squeeze.
B. Check the coach's grip on the cans to ensure it is correct as
in B and C above. The student may have to try out different sizes of
cans, small, medium or large, depending on the size of the coach's
hands, to obtain the correct size can which he can hold comfortably
without strain and that fits into the cup of his palm, with maximum
skin contact.
C. Adjust the sensitivity booster knob to the lowest position.
D. (a) Set the sensitivity knob at 1 on the sensitivity dial.
(b) Adjust the needle to the set line on the needle dial.
(c) Give the proper commands for getting a can squeeze as follows:
. . . .
"Squeeze the cans, please."
"Thank you."
The student must ensure the coach gradually increases the pressure
of his grip on the cans and relaxes it.
(d) Note the distance the needle fell when the coach squeezed the
cans.
E. Now increase the sensitivity setting to 2 and repeat steps D
(b), � and (d) above, again noting the distance the needle fell when
the coach squeezed the cans.
F. Repeat steps D (b), � and (d) for sensitivity setting at 3,
then sensitivity
setting 4, then 5, then 6, and on up until you have the needle hitting
the pin on the can squeeze. With the needle hitting the pin on the can
squeeze, you wouldn't be able to note the length of the needle fall.
Flunks are given for not having the coach remove all rings or finger
jewelry, as they can cause the needle to give unusual reads; for not
checking that there is maximum skin contact on the cans; for failing to see
that the thumbs go around the can and not up the sides; for failing to set
the meter and needle up properly; for failing to notice and handle a sudden
or hard or jerky or convulsive can squeeze instead of an even increase of
pressure on the cans or sudden letting go of the cans; for not making sure
the coach doesn't take a finger or thumb or palm off the cans when he
releases the contact; for failing to note accurately the distance the
needle fell on the can squeeze; and for giving the wrong commands. Lack of
skill in earlier drills is corrected by pink sheet.
SECTION III: To give the student auditor a reality on setting the
sensitivity for a 1/3 of a dial drop of the needle on the can squeeze.
The student auditor should know that setting the sensitivity for 1/3 of
a dial drop on the can squeeze is an integral part of setting up each and
every session he does. It is the sensitivity he will be using during the
session. It is vitally important he gets the correct sensitivity setting
for each preclear at each session, so that he will not miss reads or F/Ns.
A sensitivity setting which is too low or too high for that particular
preclear in the particular session will obscure reads and F/Ns, thus
upsetting the preclear's case. Therefore, the student auditor must be
proficient on this drill.
1. A. Have the coach pick up the cans and keep his hands on the table
so the student can see them throughout the can squeeze.
B. Check the coach's grip to ensure it is correct, also ensuring
you have the correct can size.
C. Adjust the sensitivity booster knob to the lowest position.
D. (a) Set the sensitivity knob at 5 on the sensitivity dial.
(b) Adjust the needle to set line on the dial.
(c) Get the coach to squeeze the cans ensuring he does it properly.
(d) Note the distance the needle fell when the coach squeezed the
cans.
E. On Step D (d) the needle will have fallen a distance of either
(a) LESS than 1/3 of a dial drop,
or
(b) MORE than 1/3 of a dial drop.
If it's (a) raise the sensitivity a bit and repeat steps D (b), � and
(d) and continue to do this until you have 1/3 dial drop. If it's (b)
lower the sensitivity a bit and repeat steps D (b), (c) and (d) and
continue to do this until you have 1/3 dial drop.
In other words, keep adjusting your sensitivity lower or higher
according to whether the drop is more or less than 1/3 of a dial drop,
until you get the correct sensitivity setting.
Each time a new can squeeze is asked for, the student auditor is
to make sure the coach is holding the cans properly and is giving a
correct can squeeze.
F. The student then notes the exact sensitivity setting at which
he got the 1/3 dial drop. Flunks are given for errors as in Section II
above and for failing to
recognize when a 1/3 dial drop of the needle on the can squeeze has
been obtained; for failing to recognize if the coach is giving a
considerably harder or lighter can squeeze than he was giving at
sensitivity 5, and for failing to establish the correct sensitivity
setting for 1/3 of a dial drop on the coach.
2. Now the coach has the student auditor do the drill on a number of
other students, with the coach watching, until he is satisfied that the
student can easily and accurately establish the correct sensitivity
setting for a 1/3 dial drop can squeeze.
SECTION IV: To give the student auditor a reality on how a correct
sensitivity setting for l/3 of a dial drop on the can squeeze gives a
readable and workable meter and how an incorrect sensitivity setting gives
an unreadable and unworkable meter, so the student will understand why he
has to use a sensitivity setting that gives 1/3 of a dial drop.
1. Coach has the student auditor set the sensitivity accurately on a
correct can squeeze for 1/3 dial drop as in Section III.
2. The student auditor does a "pinch test" as follows: student pinches
the coach's arm, hard enough to hurt a little bit.
3. Now, while watching the meter, the student says to the coach:
"Recall that pinch I just gave you."
"Thank you."
4. Student notes the reaction of the needle to his command and the
distance the needle fell.
5. Coach has the student do steps 2, 3, and 4 several times, each time
noting what the needle does in response to "Recall that pinch."
6. Coach now has the student set the sensitivity at 1. Student has coach
squeeze the cans and notes whether there's a read, or not. If there is
a read, note size of read and leave the sensitivity at 1. If there's no
read on the squeeze, the student still leaves the sensitivity at 1.
7. The student auditor does a new "pinch test" as in 2, 3, 4 and 5
above, noting the difference in needle response to the command "Recall
that pinch" as compared to what it was in Step 5 at the correct
sensitivity setting. There may be no read at all and the student should
notice that.
8. Coach now has student set the sensitivity at 32, and coach squeezes
the cans.
9. Student does the pinch test again and notes the reaction of the
needle to his command "Recall that pinch."
10. Coach has the student then set the sensitivity correctly for 1/3 of a
dial drop on a correct can squeeze and does the pinch test again.
11. The student should observe from these pinch tests that an accurate
sensitivity setting determined from a correct can squeeze gives a
readable and workable meter and that an incorrect sensitivity setting
gives an unreadable and unworkable meter. If he does not see this
clearly, then the coach would have the student redo steps 7 through 10
until the student sees why the sensitivity must be set for 1/3 of a
dial drop determined by a correct can squeeze.
Flunks are given for failing to note what the needle did and size of
read in response to student telling coach to recall the pinch and for
errors in setting sensitivity accurately and getting a correct can squeeze
when called for in the drill.
HISTORY: Developed as a training drill by L. Ron Hubbard at Saint Hill in
December, 1963 and revised by L. Ron Hubbard in February, 1979.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:clb/dr.jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
(Also issued as HCO PL 9 Feb 79.
Issue II. same title.)
HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH
1. If it isn't written it isn't true.
2. If it's written, read it.
3. If you can't understand it, clarify it.
4. If you can't clarify it, clear the Mis-Us.
5. If the Mis-Us won't clear, query it.
6. Get it validated as a written order.
7. Force others to read it.
IF IT CAN'T BE RUN THROUGH AS ABOVE IT'S FALSE!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dg.kc.ch.cib
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
Tech (Also issued as HCO PL 15 Feb 79, same title.)
Qual
HCO
VERBAL TECH: PENALTIES
(Ref: HCOB/HCO PL 9 Feb 79.
HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH)
ANY PERSON FOUND TO BE USING VERBAL TECH SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A COURT OF
ETHICS.
THE CHARGES ARE: GIVING OUT DATA WHICH IS CONTRARY TO HCO BULLETINS OR
POLICY LETTERS, OR OBSTRUCTING THEIR USE OR APPLICATION, CORRUPTING THEIR
INTENT, ALTERING THEIR CONTENT IN ANY WAY, INTERPRETING THEM VERBALLY OR
OTHERWISE FOR ANOTHER, OR PRETENDING TO QUOTE THEM WITHOUT SHOWING THE
ACTUAL ISSUE.
ANY ONE OF THESE CATEGORIES CONSTITUTES VERBAL TECH AND IS ACTIONABLE
PER THE ABOVE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead. Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 FEBRUARY 1979
CORRECTED & REISSUED 26 APRIL 1979
CORRECTED & REISSUED 6 MAY 1979
Remimeo
Tech
Qual (Corrections in this type style)
All Auditors
E-Meter Checksheets
E-METER ESSENTIALS
ERRATA SHEET
The following corrections are to be made in E-METER ESSENTIALS:
RE: THE TONE ARM:
Page 9 Section 10:
Delete: "no matter what the preclear says."
Add: "until the EP of that process is reached."
The whole section now reads: "If the Tone Arm shows motion,
continue the process, until the EP of that process is reached."
Page 10. Section 12:
Delete: "is a breach of the Auditor's Code Clause 13. Also to
continue a process that is producing no Tone Arm motion is a breach
of the same Clause . "
Add: "will leave the pc with By-Passed Charge. The process should
be continued to the EP of that process."
The whole section now reads: "To change a process while the Tone
Arm shows good motion will leave the pc with By-Passed Charge. The
process should be continued to the EP of that process."
RE: THE SENSITIVITY KNOB:
Page 13, Section 5:
Delete: "Have the preclear hold the electrodes comfortably in his
hands. Have him tighten his hands and then relax them, still
holding the cans. The needle should drop exactly one-third of a
dial. Adjust the sensitivity knob by asking the preclear to squeeze
the cans again and observing the needle fall."
The whole section is substituted with the following: "The exact
setting of the sensitivity knob is done as follows: Have the
preclear hold the electrodes (cans) in his hands with the cans in
contact with the cups of his palms and all his fingers and both
thumbs in a comfortable grip. Set the sensitivity at 5 and adjust
the position of the needle to set. Have the preclear squeeze the
cans with an even gradual pressure, not a sudden hard squeeze.
Watch the distance the needle drops. If the distance the needle
fell is less than one-third of a dial drop, raise the sensitivity
some and get another can squeeze, continuing this procedure till
you've got the sensitivity setting that gives you one third dial
drop on the can squeeze. If the can squeeze gave you more than one-
third dial drop at Sens. 5, lower the sensitivity setting a bit,
test
another can squeeze, continuing this procedure till you get one-
third of a dial drop.
In other words, keep adjusting your sensitivity lower or higher
according to whether the drop is more or less than one-third of a
dial drop, until you get the correct sensitivity setting."
Page 13. Section 7:
Delete: "Adjust the knob to a still needle that will yet move on
needed responses . "
Add: "Adjust the sensitivity knob to get a third of a dial drop on
the can squeeze, or as close to that as you can."
The whole section now reads: "In short, adjust the sensitivity
knob to get a third of a dial drop on the can squeeze, or as close
to that as you can."
RE: THE NEEDLE:
Page 14. Section 4:
Delete: "A fall always happens with rapidity, within a second or
two."
Add: "A fall always happens at the exact end of the question
asked."
The whole section now reads: "A falling needle (3) makes a dip to
the right as you face the meter. A fall may consist of half a
division (about one-eighth of an inch) or may consist of fifteen
dials (the whole meter face dropped fifteen times). It is still a
fall. A fall always happens at the exact end of the question asked.
It is also called a drop, a dip and a register. It denotes that a
disagreement with life on which the preclear has greater or lesser
reality has met the question asked."
Page 15. Section 9:
Delete: "upon the question being asked. A fall can be in two
stages or more providing they take place within a second or two
after the question."
Add: "at the end of the last word of the question asked."
The whole section now reads: "A fall follows at once at the end of
the last word of the question asked."
RE: CHANGE OF CHARACTERISTIC:
Page 15. Section 17:
Delete: "we must assume that that is it and we use it."
Add: "it can be further explored with the suppress and invalidate
buttons to see if it develops into a sF, F. or BD, which then can
be used."
The whole section now reads: "Change of characteristic occurs when
we hit on something in the preclear's bank. It occurs only when and
each time that we ask that exact question. As the question or item
alone changes the needle pattern, it can be further explored with
the suppress and invalidate buttons to see if it develops into a
sF, F. or BD, which then can be used."
Page 15. Section 18:
Delete: "usually" .
Add: "may".
The whole section now reads: "A question that stops a rising
needle is a change of characteristic question and like a fall means
we have struck something. Further exploration may develop it into a
fall."
Page 16. Section 21:
Delete: "within one tenth to one half of a second after you have
asked a question of the preclear."
Add: "An instant read is defined as that reaction of the needle
which occurs at the precise end of any major thought voiced by the
auditor."
The whole section now reads: "It is not much used but must be
known as it may have to be used sooner or later when we can't get
falls.
"The only needle reactions in which you should be interested are
those which occur INSTANTLY. An instant read is defined as that
reaction of the needle which occurs at the precise end of any major
thought voiced by the auditor."
RE: ROCK SLAMS:
Page 17, Section 35, ROCK SLAM (7):
Delete: "This originally meant (and still does) that you are on
the rock chain."
Add: "A Rock Slam means a hidden Evil Intention on the subject or
question under discussion or auditing."
The whole section now reads: "In assessing or running you
occasionally get a Rock Slam. A Rock Slam means a hidden Evil
Intention on the subject or question under discussion or auditing."
Page 17, Section 36:
Delete: "A Rock Slam is a crazy, irregular, unequal, jerky motion
of the needle, narrow as one inch or as wide as three inches
happening several times a second. The needle 'goes crazy', slamming
back and forth, narrowly, widely, over on the left, over on the
right, in a mad war dance or as if it were frantically trying to
escape. It means hot terminal or hot anything in an assessment and
takes precedence over a fall."
The entire section is replaced with: "A Rock Slam is a crazy,
irregular, leftright slashing motion of the needle. It repeats left
and right slashes unevenly and savagely, faster than the eye easily
follows. The needle is frantic. The width of a Rock Slam (R/S)
depends largely on sensitivity setting. It goes from one-fourth
inch to whole dial. But it slams back and forth. It means hot item
in an assessment and takes precedence over a fall or it means that
you have left rings on the pc's hands or have a loose connection in
the leads or meter. If the latter two items verify as not present
you are looking at a Rock Slam in the pc."
RE: FREE NEEDLES:
Page 17, Section 41:
Delete: "It means an idle, uninfluenced motion, no matter what you
say about the goal or terminal. It isn't just null, it's
uninfluenced by anything (except body reactions)."
The entire section is replaced by: "It means the same as a
Floating Needle, which is a rhythmic sweep of the dial at a slow,
even pace of the needle, back and forth, back and forth, without
change in the width of the swing except perhaps to widen as the pc
gets off the last small bits of charge. Note that it can get so
wide that you have to shift the Tone Arm back and forth, back and
forth, to keep the needle on the dial in which case you have a
floating tone arm."
Page 18 Section 44:
Delete: "It doesn't happen until a person is well above release,
so don't worry about it until you see it."
The whole section is replaced with: "It can occur after a
cognition, blowdown of the Tone Arm, at a release point, or on the
erasure of a Dianetic chain."
Page 18. Section 46:
Delete: "A Free Needle means, when it's used as a term, 'The
preclear is getting awful close to clear.'"
The whole section is replaced with: "A Free Needle or Floating
Needle is one of the parts of the End Phenomena for any process or
action."
RE: SECURITY CHECKING:
Page 21. Section 3:
Delete: "(b) it's in a past life and he doesn't consciously know
about it (since the meter precedes preclear consciousness)."
The entire line is replaced with: "(b) there's an earlier similar
overt or withhold . "
Page 22. Section 5:
Delete: "In the case of a past life possibility you add, 'In this
lifetime' to your security question. As you repeat that, if the
misdeed was in a past life, the fall will vanish."
The whole section is replaced with: "In the case of (b) when
there's an earlier similar overt or withhold, you must ask for it
and get it."
Page 22. Section 7:
Delete: "always (as in all Rudiments) ask the question again as
this might not be all of it."
Add: "you get all the data and handle it earlier similar withhold
as necessary to an F/N."
The whole section now reads: "If the preclear tells you a
withhold, you get all the data and handle it earlier similar
withhold as necessary to an F/N."
Page 22. Section 9:
Delete: "On a security check sheet, follow up every change of
characteristic before you go on."
Add: "On a security check, follow up every change of
characteristic, if it is instant, before you go on."
The whole section now reads: "On a security check, follow up every
change of characteristic, if it is instant, before you go on.
Change of characteristic, if it amounts to anything, will develop
into a fall."
Page 22, Section 10:
Delete. "(or it's a past life)".
Add: "or there's an earlier similar overt or withhold"
The whole section now reads: "If the preclear hasn't told all or
there's an earlier similar overt or withhold, the meter won't
clear."
Page 22, Section 14:
No deletions.
Add: "except when it's a false read which can be checked for."
The whole section now reads: "Grim experience of a decade has
taught me that it's (a) or (b) and never 'I moved the needle
myself' or 'I feel nervous just generally'. The E-Meter is right
even when it seems to make the preclear wrong, except when it's a
false read which can be checked for."
RE: METER FRAILTIES:
Page 25, Section 7:
Delete: "if that doesn't stop it, squirt some lighter fluid into
the Tone Arm 'bearing' from the meter face side."
Add: "including the Mark V until February 1979".
The entire section now reads: "One exception: The British and
American Hubbard Electrometer early models including the Mark V
until February 1979 had a 'carbon pot' which is to say the Tone Arm
was in 'pure carbon bearings', if you could call it that. A speck
of dust can get in the 'pot' and cause the needle to rock slam
whether connected to the preclear or not. Pull the lead wire jack
(disconnecting cans) and if the slam continues, it's the 'pot'
that's wrong. Work the Tone Arm vigorously for a short while. If
that doesn't stop it, turn it in to be repaired. Later models of
the British and American Hubbard Electrometer have 'wire wound
pots' and this doesn't happen . "
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 22 FEBRUARY 1979
Remimeo
TR Course
Checksheet
Tech
Qual
ERRATA-P.A.B. No. 147
P.A.B. No. 147, as it appears in Technical Volume III, page 335,
contains a typo to be corrected as follows:
In the first paragraph, 3rd line, delete the word "curve" and insert
the word "career."
The correct sentence reads:
"And if an auditor doesn't successfully pass the Communication Course,
then to the end of any career he has as an auditor, there will be something
wrong with his auditing."
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
GROUP AUDITOR'S HANDBOOK
by
L. Ron Hubbard
Published March 1979
Group Auditing was first introduced to the public view by L. Ron
Hubbard in 1952. Continuous research and development of Dianetics and
Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard since that time, has consistently improved
the results which may be expected from Group Auditing.
The first publications on the subject of Group Auditing were released
in 1954; Scientology: Group Auditor's Handbook and Scientology: Group
Auditor's Handbook Volume Two.
March 1979 saw the publication of a new edition of that first two-
volume set-revised to bring it up-to-date and aligned with the tremendous
technical developments which have occurred in Scientology since 1954.
The Group Auditor's Handbook is a precise manual of definite and proven
procedure. In the hands of an alert Group Auditor it can be a means of
initiating immediately the first strong steps toward the goals of better
conditions and freedom for mankind, for these sessions are applicable to
all kinds of groups: mixed groups, congregations, businessmen and women,
industrial employees, sports and military units, disabled soldiers and
handicapped persons, governmental groups, and criminals now in
institutions.
Today, by Group Auditing, excellent results in improved individual
ability, awareness and spiritual well-being can be achieved for the many.
This offers a great hope for the future of humanity. Wherever and whenever
people get together you will find an exciting opportunity to use these
books.
144 pages in Volume One, 136 pages in Volume Two, soft cover, with ten
sessions in each volume including instructions and appendices giving
remedies and codes. Available from your nearest Scientology Organization or
Mission, or direct from the publishers: Church of Scientology Publications
Organization U.S., 4833 Fountain Ave., East Annex, Los Angeles, California
90029, U.S.A.: or Scientology Publications Organization, Store Kongensgade
55, 1264 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MARCH 1979R
REVISED 30 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
(Revisions in this type style)
Art Serves 6
ART IN ITS BASICS
Every separate sector of artistic creations has its own basic rules.
Such areas include writing, painting, lighting, camera work, costumes,
sets, marketing, recording, mixing-every contributory sector to a final art
offering.
Each one of these areas has basic stable data which govern it. They are
contained in the textbooks on these subjects.
These are the rules-the stable data, the senior data of each
specialized activity.
We follow the rules because the rules give impact, effect and message.
We don't follow the rules because we're told to, we follow the rules to get
a product that is effective and brings about what we want brought about.
Anybody who thinks it's just an odd idea that you just follow the rules
should get Short Form Product Clearing, because rules have everything to do
with the value of the product.
Anybody can turn out amateur junk. Who looks at it? Who would look at
it even if they were paid?
The distance between amateured junk and an effective product is
accomplished by knowing and following the basic rules and using them
expertly.
When you add to this dexterous handling of materials and equipment and
then add some experience you have a professional.
When you add a dash of good sense and talent you have a knockout.
Be professional in whatever you do, the tale is told by the
effectiveness of the product on its viewers and intended public.
So whatever your specialty, you have to sort out what the senior data
are-the rules-and know them cold, so you don't even have to think about
them and can think with them.
Did you ever realize that each one of these specialties has only a
dozen or two rules?
A=A=A is the way most people handle data, some of these A's however,
really have a thousand times the importance of other data.
If you know these and sort them out you have a chance of becoming a
professional and if you have sorted them out and can think with them and
have manual dexterity with materials and equipment any professional in that
field will recognize you as a professional but far more important, your
specialty will communicate.
If you disregard the above you'll be out of communication with your
specialty not only specialty but every viewer including kids, whether they
know the rules or not.
Be a professional in whatever you do.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revisions assisted by
Maggie Sibersky
LRH Comps I/C
LRH:MS:jk.dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MARCH 1979R
REVISED 6 MARCH 1979
Remimeo
All Orgs
All Missions (Revisions in this type style)
C/Ses (Ellipsis indicates deletion)
Auditors
Ds of P
Tech
Quay
HCO
Ethics Officers
KOTs
DIANETIC CLEAR FALSE DECLARES
Any org or mission staff declaring a Dianetic Clear "achieved in other
practices" is subject to expulsion from the Church.
Technically, a very few thetans have never been anything but Clear.
These few didn't "go Clear" on anything; they have simply always been
Clear. When a natural Clear is found it should be so stated. To assign this
condition to some other practice is a suppression of Dianetics and
Scientology.
Anyone evaluating for or feeding a preclear data to persuade him to
declare Dianetic Clear is also actionable....
Anyone suppressively validating squirrel practices or groups by stating
they are producing Dianetic Clears is also actionable as above, as it is
not possible. It requires the exact application of Scientology and/or
Dianetic technology to bring a preclear up to the state of Clear.
Falsely declaring a person a Dianetic Clear who isn't, and failing to
declare one who made it on Dianetics or the Clearing Course or who has
always been Clear, are also actionable.
People don't go Clear in garbage eating or psychiatry-they perish. Thus
herding people into their hands by falsely validating them is suppressive.
Any and all such false declares are canceled.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 MARCH 1979RB
REVISED 2 SEPTEMBER 1979
Remimeo
(Also issued as an HCO Policy Letter
of same date, same title.)
(Revisions in this type style)
Esto Series 35RB
Word Clearing Series 60RB
Product Debug Series 7R
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND CYCLES OF ACTION
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND NO PRODUCT
A misunderstood word can prevent a person from understanding the
remainder of what is heard or written.
I have now discovered that: A MISUNDERSTOOD on any given subject CAN
PREVENT THE COMPLETION OF A CYCLE OF ACTION related to that subject.
Therefore those people who don't complete cycles of action on certain
subjects have a misunderstood word on them.
This then results in no-product situations.
Therefore when you are getting no product, look for the misunderstood
word on the subject no matter how long and arduous it is. It's there. And
when it's found the person can go on and complete a cycle of action and get
a product.
CAUTION: Make sure the person actually does have an inability to
complete a cycle of action before you get into handling him. You don't
handle somebody who is completing cycles of action that result in
production.
MISUNDERSTOODS AND PERCEPTION
Misunderstoods can also act as perception shut-offs. They can actually
interrupt a person's perception.
It is quite astonishing that perceptions such as sight, sound and even
touch can be shut off by Mis-U words.
This opens the door to the fact that people apparently do not see,
hear, notice or handle outnesses when they have Mis-Us on them.
This also may open the door to people who have perceptic shut-offs,
such as poor eyesight, deafness or other perception difficulties.
MISUNDERSTOODS AND COMPLEXITY
Misunderstoods lead to complexity. People who have Mis-Us in an area
are inclined to develop vast complexities. They can generate confusions and
complexities beyond belief.
People do this because, having misunderstoods, they do not confront and
duplicate in the area and so get into a lot of think-think and unnecessary
significance. Their ability to get things done in that area dwindles as a
result. And at the bottom of all this is simply misunderstood words.
MISUNDERSTOODS AND TOTAL ORGANIZE
When you see an area that is organizing only, you know that area is
loaded with misunderstoods .
When people have incomplete cycles due to Mis-Us they get bogged down
into organization.
You can tell when people have Mis-Us-they are totally involved in
organize, organize, organize. They don't know what they are doing.
There is a level below this-they have overts and withholds which
prevent even organizing.
Below that level people are PTS.
Lacking a sense of organization actually lies below this. It is below
the level of Mis-Us, overts and withholds and PTSness-and you'd have to go
north through PTSness and overts and withholds to even get to the Mis-Us.
MISUNDERSTOODS AND NO ORGANIZE
There can also exist a condition where someone does not organize any
corner of his area or work or organizations or lines. This manifests itself
by irrational demands to only produce and to prevent any organization so
that production can occur. At the bottom of this you are very likely to
find misunderstood words, particularly on the purpose of the production or
why one is producing. It is in this sector that you get overt products most
frequently.
HANDLING
The exact procedure for handling these Mis-Us is given in HCOB 17 Jun
79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS.
Crashing Mis-U finding is done as part of HCO PL 23 Aug 79 / DEBUG TECH.
Additional data on the location of Crashing Mis-Us is found in HCOB 14 Aug
79 CRASHING MIS-Us, BLOCKS TO FINDING THEM and HCOB 16 Jul 79 THE "ELUSIVE"
MIS-U OR CRASHING MIS-U.
With this knowledge we can now handle all the factors that prevent the
completion of cycles of action and products.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal.dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 APRIL 1979
Remimeo
Art HCOB 7
FINE ARTS VERSUS ILLUSTRATIONS
The division between fine arts and illustrations is that fine arts
permit the viewer to contribute his own interpretations or originations to
the scene whereas illustrations are "too literal" and give him the whole
works.
To evoke an emotion in fine arts, the spectator must be invited to
contribute part of the meaning.
In a poster, the viewer is most often intended to be clobbered.
In illustration, the viewer is intended to be informed.
A work of fine art can elicit quite different emotional contributions
from one member of an audience to the next as he is left free to some
degree to contribute meaning and emotion at his choice.
In fine arts, the viewer must supply something to make it complete.
Fine arts evoke some chord in the viewer's nature or past.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:cb
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 APRIL 1979
All C/Ses
NED Auditors
Qual/Tech Staff C/S Series 106
HCO
KOTs
AUDITING THE DIANETIC CLEAR
(Ref: HCOB 1 Dec 78 PROGRAMMING THE
DIANETIC CLEAR
FOR HIS NEXT STEP
HCOB 8 Oct 70 C/S Series 20
PERSISTENT F/N
HCOB 19 Apr 72 C/S Series 77
"QUICKIE" DEFINED)
It has recently come to my attention that some auditors are delivering
grades in outrageously short periods of time to Dianetic Clear pcs and only
giving Quad Grades to the Dianetic Clear without making full use of the
Expanded Grades. Such pcs are being denied the full gains of the grade
processes due to Quickie Grades-out-tech.
From this point forward, anyone auditing a pc who is Dianetic Clear or
Natural Clear, on the grades, must:
1) M9 and starrate HCOB 8 Oct 70 C/S Series 20 PERSISTENT F/N,
2) M9 and starrate HCOB 19 Apr 72 C/S Series 77 "QUICKIE" DEFINED
and
3) Clay demo the consequences of Quickie Grades.
It is the responsibility of the C/S to see that the above checkouts
occur without stopping or slowing delivery lines.
These actions will ensure that the Dianetic Clear has the opportunity
to attain all the benefits of the grades. In addition to the immediate
abilities gained from the grades being properly delivered, having his
grades really IN will prevent the pre-OT from running into difficulties on
the OT levels.
The grades are a very essential part of the Grade Chart and must not be
delivered over a persistent F/N or skimped on in any way. Let's Keep
Scientology Working!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 MAY 1979
Issue I
All AOs
All St. Hills
Cl IV Orgs
DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE
(Refs: HCOB 24 Sep 78 CONFIDENTIAL, THE
Iss IV STATE OF CLEAR
HCOB 5 Mar 79R DIANETIC CLEAR FALSE
DECLARES
HCOB 29 Nov 78 C/S Series 104
DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS
HCOB 5 Dec 78 C/S Series 105
DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS
ADDITIONAL DATA
HCOB 24 Sep 78 DIANETIC CLEAR
Iss III
HCOB 1 May 79 INTERVIEW
HCO PL 1 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVES
HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING
HCOB 2 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
Iss II SPECIAL INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT LIST
HCOB 3 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVE,
C/S AND AUDITOR
REQUIREMENTS)
With the boom in Dianetic Clears it became necessary that a procedure
be developed so that the state of Clear would be safeguarded and so that
those who did achieve Dianetic Clear could get it properly acknowledged and
attain a full resurgence of the state.
The Dianetic Clear Special Intensive is designed to sort out and handle
the following situations:
1. When an item stating the pc has gone Dianetic Clear has read on a C/S
53, GF, L3RF, End of Endless Drug Rundown List or Int RD Correction
List or any other correction list, and the read has been confirmed
(i.e. it is not a false or protest read or read on assertion).
Such a read is only two-way commed to F/N, and is not Date/Located or
otherwise handled at this point. The person is signed up for a Dianetic
Clear Special Intensive, during which he will get the state of Clear
fully polished up and rehabilitated.
2. When an individual thinks he is or might be Dianetic Clear.
3. When a person has attested to Dianetic Clear and has not had a formal
auditing session to establish it, but has only had a mere D of P
interview.
(Trying to audit or rehab in an interview is out-tech, a misuse of D
of P interviews, and doesn't verify or rehabilitate the state.)
4. Where there has been some attempt made to rehab the state of Dianetic
Clear on
an individual without use of this intensive, which didn't reach the
correct end phenomena, or where the person wasn't doing well after the
rehab.
(NOTE: The Dianetic Clear Special Intensive is not given to a non-
Dianetic Clear in order to audit him up to that state. Its use
is for verification and rehabbing of the state of Dianetic
Clear, per the above.)
PURCHASE OF AUDITING
If the person is in the middle of an intensive and goes Clear, or it is
discovered that he has gone Clear in past auditing, the remaining hours of
the intensive may be applied to the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive,
provided there is a minimum of 5 hours remaining. If there is less than
five hours remaining, then he would need to purchase a minimum of 5 hours
for the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
This issue gives the exact procedure to follow to handle each of the
above situations standardly in an auditing session.
With HCO PL 1 May 79, DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVES, we have
established the standard lines and policy concerning Dianetic Clear checks
and rehabilitation. The state of Dianetic Clear is not to be checked,
verified or rehabbed in a D of P interview or any other type of interview.
Such actions are done only in the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
This intensive is used to:
a) Establish with no eval or inval in the procedure whether the
person has actually achieved the state or not;
b) Ensure that the person who has made it attains a FULL
resurgence of the state;
c) Establish for the person who has not yet made Dianetic Clear
that he hasn't. get any win he has achieved acknowledged, and get
him programmed and onto his next auditing to get him further toward
achieving the state of Clear;
d) If he thinks this intensive is going to make him Dianetic
Clear, it establishes him on his proper rundown and gets him that
much closer to Clear.
FES AND FOLDER STUDY
Immediately after the intensive is purchased, and before the intensive
is begun the first action is a full FES of the pc's folders so that the C/S
has an accurate estimation of the case in general as well as data on any
originations or actions taken on the subject of Dianetic Clear. This FES
must include examining the person's past auditing on the subject of Int and
L&N lists, because if either of these are out you cannot audit anything
else until these are handled.
ALTERNATIVE CHOICES
As the FES and folder study may reveal out-Int, out-L&N lists, or past
rough auditing needing repair, you would not then be able to proceed with
the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive until out-Int, out-L&N lists or rough
auditing were repaired.
During the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive you may find that the
person has no interest in the questions, that he is there to become Clear
and didn't go Clear in past auditing. You may encounter crashing
misunderstood words on the subject of Clear or auditing.
This gives a choice between:
a) If Int or L&N lists are out or the person has had rough
auditing, sign him up for and deliver the End of Endless Int Repair
Rundown, L&N list repair, or a C/S 53 to F/Ning list. (These are sold
by 12t/2 hour intensives, and he would need these actions done anyway
before he could proceed up the Bridge.)
NOTE: IF HE HAS GONE DIANETIC CLEAR AND YOU HAVE TO HANDLE INT,
LISTS, OR REPAIR PAST AUDITING BEFORE DOING THE DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVE, YOU MUST INDICATE THAT HE HAS GONE DIANETIC
CLEAR AND THAT THIS HAS NOT YET BEEN PATCHED UP. THIS INDICATION
IS MADE BEFORE STARTING TO HANDLE INT, LISTS OR REPAIR.
b) If there is no evidence of out-Int or out-L&N lists, proceed with the
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
c) If during the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive you find that he has
no interest and didn't go Clear in past auditing, you would bridge him
over to his next auditing step. Don't make him wrong for having bought
the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive. but see that he gets onto a
proper program and gets that much closer to Clear in the 5 hours.
The correct program is determined by the C/S and would probably be Word
Clearing, Objective Processes, or NED (New Era Dianetics). At the end of
this 5 hours he would be sent to the Registrar to get further intensives
needed to complete.
THE PROCEDURE
Each step of the intensive is carried out in a formal auditing session
(never in an interview).
STEP I: TWO- WAY COMM
Each of the following questions are taken up with the pc with good two-
way communication.
It is important that all reads, tone arm action with length of reads
and BDs and needle behaviour are noted clearly in the worksheets.
If the pc shows no interest in the questions, or in Dianetic Clear,
don't push him to answer or let him run on an unreading question. Instead
clear any misunderstood word or words on the subject of Clear, and end off
to get the folder to the C/S to handle per choice c) above under
Alternative Choices. This way he will at least get further toward Clear
within the 5 hours and it makes him right for having got the auditing.
A typical C/S for Step 1 of the Dianetic Clear Intensive would read as
follows:
A. Give the pc an R-Factor on what you are going to be doing in this
session.
B. Fly each rud.
1. When do you feel you went Dianetic Clear?
1A. (If pc doesn't feel he did go Dianetic Clear and is not interested,
ask him "Tell me what you would like to accomplish in auditing?" Take
this to F/N and end off for a new C/S.)
2. What happened at that time?
3. Is there anything else that occurred that made you feel you went
Dianetic Clear?
4. How were you running Dianetics before the point you feel you
went Dianetic Clear?
5. How were you running Dianetics after the point you feel you went
Dianetic Clear?
6. Did you experience life differently after the point you feel you went
Dianetic Clear and since that time? If so, tell me about it.
7. Has there been any invalidation of your originations regarding
Dianetic Clear? (If so, get who and what was said.)
8. Has anyone evaluated for you on the subject of Dianetic Clear? (If
so, get who and what was said.)
8A. (If it turns out that someone suggested that he was Dianetic Clear,
or tried to feed him the EP or cognition, take the evaluation or
suggestion earlier similar to F/N, and end off for a new C/S.)
9. Did you experience any other changes not already mentioned in this
session, that you connect with the state of being Clear?
10. Has anyone discussed the subject of Dianetic Clear with you? (If so,
get details and pull strings to ensure there has been no feeding of
cognitions.)
11. Have you always been Clear?
12. Is there anything else you would like to say regarding being Dianetic
Clear that hasn't already been covered here?
The C/S may add questions of his own to the above at his discretion but
these must not be evaluative nor invalidative.
When you have full data on each of the two-way comm questions, end the
session and send the folder to the C/S. The auditor should include in his
proposed C/S a recommendation as to whether Step II or III should be done
as the next action.
STEP II: CONDITIONAL: DATE/LOCATE
The C/S would ONLY order Step II at this point after full review of
data obtained in Step I, and under the following conditions:
a) It has been verified unquestionably in Step I that the pc had
attained the state of Dianetic Clear.
b) The pc must have given the proper evidences of having gone Clear.
c) Pc is F/Ning with VGIs.
d) By content of the session and pc indicators there is no bypassed
charge concerning the state of Dianetic Clear to be handled.
It will be in rare instances that Step II is done at this point in the
intensive. Ordinarily Date/Locate is done as the last action following the
Dianetic Clear Intensive Assessment List. It is included here as a
conditional step for the pc who is manifesting all of the above indicators
following Step I.
Step II consists of:
1. DATE/LOCATE the point the pc went Dianetic Clear, using the
full and exact procedure given in HCOB 15 Nov 78, DATING AND
LOCATING.
2. When the point the pc went Dianetic Clear has been
correctly dated and located, the folder is sent to the C/S.
3. If Date/Locate has been correctly done, the pc has stated the
Clear cognition in some wording, has a floating, floppy needle and
floating TA, with VVVGIs, the C/S may send the pc to attest to the
state of Dianetic Clear.
If all of the above indicators (a thru d) are not in or if it appears
the pc has any bypassed charge to be handled, the C/S would not order Step
II at this point but would order Step III, the Dianetic Clear Special
Intensive Assessment List be done.
STEP III: THE DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE ASSESSMENT LIST
(Ref: HCOB 2 May 79 Iss II, THE DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT LIST.)
1. Assess the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List by Method
3, and handle each reading item per list instructions.
2. When each reading item has been handled, with pc F/Ning and VGIs, the
Date/Locate step (No. 49) is taken to completion, and folder is sent to
the C/S.
3. If the assessment list, including the Date/Locate step, has been
correctly done, the pc has stated the Clear cognition in some wording,
has a floating, floppy needle and floating TA with VVGIs, the C/S may
send the pc to attest to the state of Dianetic Clear.
END PHENOMENA
The end phenomena of the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive is A FULL
RESURGENCE OF THE STATE OF DIANETIC CLEAR, for the person who has achieved
Dianetic Clear.
STEP IV: CONDITIONAL: FOR THE PERSON WHO HASN'T YET ATTAINED DIANETIC
CLEAR.
On one of the above steps of the intensive, it may become obvious that
the person hasn't yet attained Dianetic Clear.
Once this has been adjudicated by the C/S, the following step is done.
(If the pc still has any hours remaining from the 5-hour intensive, they
would be used for this C/S as it is still part of the intensive. As more
hours are needed they would of course have to be purchased.)
1) Give the pc the R-Factor that he hasn't attained the state of
Dianetic Clear at this point and that he is being programmed so as not to
be denied any of the gains on the Grade Chart, as in this way he will be
adequately prepared to do Advance Course levels. The C/S then programs the
case so that this can occur and the pc is informed he should continue with
his auditing program. (If he had already been allowed to attest earlier,
that the person handling the attest cycle didn't have all the data at that
time . )
If there is any upset on this indication, go to step 2; if no upset, go
to step 3.
2) Assess a GF M5 to locate and handle the remaining charge. (A C/S 53
may be assessed if more appropriate.)
3) With pc VGIs in, find out if there is some valid win or gain of
ability that he has achieved. There will usually be one, so get it and give
him a good acknowledgement.
4) Send the folder to the C/S for adjudication. Unless other actions are
necessary, C/S will have the pc sent to Qual to attest to his win and
completion of the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
The end result of Step IV should be a person who feels good about the gains
he has made and who is eager to continue up the Bridge.
D/L CAUTION
It has been found that a pc who has gone Dianetic Clear, and who then
receives a messed up D/L of the point, may become uncertain as to when he
actually did achieve this state. At this point the pc may feel that he
didn't go Dianetic Clear after all. He may also be a Natural Clear, in
which case there would not be any point to Date/Locate.
(NOTE: A messed up Date/Locate would be handled per HCOB 15 Nov 78,
DATING AND LOCATING.)
AUDITORS AND C/SES TAKE NOTE
The questions in the above sessions indicate what kind of questions
should be asked to verify the state of Dianetic Clear or Natural Clear.
There may be other questions the C/S may ask in addition to these. Bear in
mind that you may often be dealing with untrained pcs who don't know quite
what is being looked for. An excellent comm cycle is essential in these
sessions, and very smooth TR 3 and TR 4 are needed to really get your
questions answered and clarified as necessary. Otherwise you may lose
people who have actually made it. On the other hand, the questions are
geared to find out what actually did occur and not to evaluate or lead a
person into a premature attestation.
You MUST NOT EVALUATE for a pc by asking questions that ask him to
describe his current case state in relation to his bank or mental image
pictures, or asking him what his abilities are in relation to his mental
image pictures. The rule here is not to evaluate at all as it will only
lead you and the pc into trouble.
A SMOOTH LINE
So, now you have it clearly stated. We can now get pcs through these
verification cycles smoothly. An important point here is that whatever the
outcome of the DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE, each individual should
continue right along and not get parked somewhere on the Bridge. There is a
lot of progress to be made and with this intensive, many more people will
be enjoying the upper levels sooner.
So, get to it! This planet needs more OTs, NOW!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH :jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 MAY 1979
Issue II
All AOs
All St. Hills
Cl IV Orgs
DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT LIST
(Ref HCO PL 1 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVES
HCOB 2 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
Issue I SPECIAL INTENSIVE
HCOB 3 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVE
C/S AND AUDITOR
REQUIREMENTS)
IMPORTANT: THIS LIST MAY ONLY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVE AND MAY ONLY BE USED BY A FULLY QUALIFIED
AUDITOR WHO HAS MET ALL REQUIREMENTS STATED IN HCOB 3 MAY 79
DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE-C/S AND AUDITOR REQUIREMENTS.
This assessment list is the list which is assessed as Step III of the
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive. It will sort out and handle any bypassed
charge which would prevent a resurgence of the state of Clear. This list is
only to be assessed when the C/S has ordered the auditor to do so.
It is to be assessed M3 and may be reassessed as needed. If an item is
seen to read but is met with the pc groping, puzzling, or frowning, check
False and then Protest if necessary. Don't let him stew in a baffled state
on a question as he can easily go into inval at this point.
The end phenomena of the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment
List is a full resurgence of the state of Clear with the accompanying meter
phenomena. (Ref: HCOB 5 Dec 78 C/S Series 105 DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS-
ADDITIONAL DATA). The session must be ended off when that occurs. No "say
or ask." Just a good ack and an "End of Session." This can happen before
getting to item No. 49.
When all reading lines on this list have been handled to F/N. the
auditor would then Date/Locate the point per item 49 (if the Clear cog has
been originated).
On occasion, it may show up that the person didn't actually make it.
When this happens or is suspected. send the folder to the C/S upon
completing the item you're working on. Refer to HCOB 2 May 79 Iss I
DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE for the handling should the C/S confirm
that this is the case.
1) Assess the following:
A) INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING? _________
B) GO IN? _________
C) WENT IN? _________
D) PUT IN? _________
E) WANT TO GO IN? _________
F) CAN'T GET IN? _________
G) KICKED OUT OF SPACES? _________
H) CAN'T GO IN? _________
I) TRAPPED? _________
J) FORCED IN? _________
K) PULLED IN? _________
L) PUSHED IN? _________
(If you get a valid read on any of the above, and it is not a false
read or protest read, end off for a new C/S, as if Int is out you must
handle it before doing any other auditing action. Ref: HCOB 24 Sep
78RA, Int Series 4RA, THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR RUNDOWN.)
2) IS THERE A LIST ERROR? _________
(L4BRA and handle)
3) HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN A WRONG ITEM? _________
(L4BRA and handle)
4) HAVE YOU BEEN GIVEN A WRONG INDICATION? _________
(L4BRA and handle)
5) IS THERE AN OUT-LIST? _________
(L4BRA and handle)
6) DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
(Handle the ARC break E/S to F/N)
7) ARE YOU UPSET? _________
(Handle the ARC break E/S to F/N)
8) DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? _________
(Itsa E/S to F/N)
9) ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING? _________
(Use withhold system E/S to F/N)
10) IS THERE SOME SORT OF WITHHOLD? _________
(Use withhold system E/S to F/N)
11) HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS? _________
(Get what it is E/S to F/N)
12) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
(Handle the ARC break E/S to F/N)
13) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, ARE YOU UPSET? _________
(Get what upset is and handle the ARC break)
14) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? _________
(Itsa E/S to F/N)
15) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING?
_________
(Use withhold system E/S to F/N)
16) HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER OUT-RUDIMENTS? _________
(Standard handling of the out-rud(s) E/S to F/N)
17) HAVE YOU BEEN INTERVIEWED OVER OUT-RUDIMENTS? _________
(Standard handling of the out-rud(s) E/S to F/N)
18) HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED ON ENGRAMS AFTER GOING CLEAR? _________
(Indicate and do L3RF INDICATING READING ITEMS ONLY-DO NOT RUN ANY
DIANETICS)
19) HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE WITH DIANETICS? _________
(Indicate and do L3RF INDICATING READING ITEMS ONLY-DO NOT RUN ANY
DIANETICS)
20) HAVE YOU HAD TROUBLE GOING EARLIER SIMILAR ON DIANETICS?
_________
(Indicate and do L3RF INDICATING READING ITEMS ONLY-DO NOT RUN ANY
DIANETICS)
21) DO YOU HAVE UNFLAT R3RA . . . UNFLAT R3R? _________
(L3RF and INDICATE-DO NOT RUN ANY DIANETICS)
22) HAVE YOU BEEN FORCED TO RUN DIANETICS? _________
(L3RF and INDICATE-DO NOT RUN ANY DIANETICS)
23) WAS IT NOT YOUR INCIDENT? _________
(Ind. E/S to F/N)
24) WERE YOU PUTTING THINGS THERE TO RUN? _________
(Ind. 2 W C to F/N)
25) WERE YOU LOOKING FOR THINGS NOT THERE? _________
(Ind. E/S to F/N)
26) WERE YOU PUTTING SOMETHING THERE WHERE THERE WAS NOTHING?
_________
(Ind. 2WC to F/N)
27) ARE YOU PROTESTING ANYTHING?
(Itsa E/S to F/N)
28) DID YOU GO CLEAR FROM PAST-LIFE AUDITING? _________
(Ind. to F/N and then DATE/LOCATE after remaining lines on this list
have been F/Ned)
29) HAS THERE BEEN ANY INVALIDATION OF DIANETIC CLEAR? _________
(2WC to F/N)
30) HAS THERE BEEN ANY INVALIDATION OF YOUR PREVIOUS AUDITING?
_________
(2WC to F/N)
31) HAVE YOU BEEN INVALIDATED? _________
(Itsa E/S to F/N)
32) HAVE YOU INVALIDATED THE FACT YOU WENT DIANETIC CLEAR?
_________
(2WC to F/N)
33) HAS ANYONE SUGGESTED TO YOU THAT YOU DIDN'T MAKE IT? _________
(Itsa E/S to F/N)
34) HAS THERE BEEN ANY EVALUATION? _________
(2WC to F/N)
35) HAS YOUR BEHAVIOR BEEN EVALUATED? _________
(2WC to F/N)
36) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, HAS THERE BEEN ANY EVALUATION?
_________
(2WC to F/N)
37) DO YOU FEEL SUPPRESSED? _________
(2WC to F/N. C/S to program as needed for further PTS handling)
38) ARE YOU PTS? _________
(Same handing as question 37)
39) IS SOMEONE OR SOMETHING HOSTILE TO YOU? _________
(Same handing as question 37)
40) HAVE YOU BEEN PREVENTED FROM ATTESTING? _________
(2WC to F/N. Get off any protest and/or out-rud)
41) REGARDING DIANETIC CLEAR, DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN'T BELIEVE IT?
_________
(2WC to F/N)
42) ARE YOU WAITING FOR A SPECIAL COGNITION? _________
(2WC to F/N)
43) COULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE? _________
(2WC to F/N)
44) HAVE YOU BEEN OVERREPAIRED? _________
(Find out what and clean up any protest. Rehab to F/N or D/L. If it
is Dianetics or Dianetic Clear, DATE/LOCATE ONLY and END OFF!)
45) IS THERE SOMETHING THAT SHOULD HAVE READ BUT HASN'T? _________
(Get what and handle)
46) HAVE YOU ALWAYS BEEN CLEAR? _________
(Indicate. Get off any invalidation. Do not attempt to do No. 49,
Date/ Locate.)
47) ARE YOU PRETENDING TO BE CLEAR TO GET FREE SERVICE OR FOR STATUS?
_________
(Pull this as a W/H. Do not try to Date/Locate as he has not attained
the state of Clear. He may have other W/Hs missed in auditing which
need to be pulled. Such a person is probably PTS and should be C/Sed
for a PTS interview and handling.)
48) IS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(2WC to find what. Handle it if you can or return to C/S)
THE AUDITOR MAY REASSESS THIS LIST M3, ESPECIALLY IF HEAVILY CHARGED
THE FIRST TIME THROUGH.
AFTER ALL READS ARE HANDLED AND THE PC IS VGIs, DO THIS STEP BUT ONLY
IF THE CLEAR COG HAD ALREADY BEEN GIVEN.
(THIS IS NOT ASSESSED: IT IS DONE)
49) DATE/LOCATE THE POINT THE STATE OF DIANETIC CLEAR WAS ATTAINED.
_________
(Ref: HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING for exact procedure)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 MAY 1979
All AOs
All St. Hills
Cl IV Orgs
HCOs in Cl IV IMPORTANT
Orgs and above
KOTs
Qual Hats
C/S Hats
DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE
C/S AND AUDITOR REQUIREMENTS
(Ref: HCO PL 1 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
SPECIAL INTENSIVES
HCOB 2 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR
Issue I SPECIAL INTENSIVE)
Due to the nature of the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive and the vital
data in its accompanying issues, the following requirements must be fully
met by every C/S and auditor delivering this intensive to any pc:
1. Must be Dianetic Clear, Clear or above.
2. Must not fall under any of the A-J categories covered in HCO PL
27 Oct 64, POLICIES ON PHYSICAL HEALING, INSANITY AND TROUBLESOME SOURCES.
3. Must be fully bonded by HCO of their org before given access to
any confidential Dianetic Clear HCOBs.
4. Must have a valid permanent cert for the level of Cl IV or
above in order to audit the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
5. Must have a valid permanent cert as a Cl IV or above C/S in
order to C/S the Dianetic Clear Special Intensive.
6. Must Method 9 Word Clear and get a starrate checkout on this
HCOB (HCOB 3 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE-C/S AND AUDITOR
REQUIREMENTS). . .
7. Must have full Qual OK to do two way comm.
8. Must Method 9 Word Clear and get a starrate checkout on HCOB 15
Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING.
9. Must clay demo the Date/Locate procedure.
10. Must Method 9 Word Clear and get a starrate checkout on the
following HCOBs:
A) HCOB 24 Sep 78 Iss III DIANETIC CLEAR.
B) HCOB 24 Sep 78 Iss IV CONFIDENTIAL-THE STATE OF DIANETIC CLEAR.
C) HCOB 29 Nov 78 C/S Series 104 DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS.
D) HCOB 5 Dec 78 C/S Series 105 DIANETIC CLEAR ATTESTS- ADDITIONAL
DATA.
E) HCOB 5 Mar 79R DIANETIC CLEAR FALSE DECLARES.
F) HCO PL 1 May 79 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVES.
G) HCOB 2 May 79 Iss I DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE.
H) HCOB 2 May 79 Iss II DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT LIST.
11. Must fully drill each step of the Dianetic Clear Special
Intensive (per HCOB 2 May 79 Iss I-DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE).
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jk
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1979
Remimeo
Art Series 8
A PROFESSIONAL
Ref: HCOB 4 March 1979 Art Series 6
ART IN ITS BASICS
A professional is somebody that can produce a high quality product. A
professional is not an audience, and when he views things, he looks for
what's good in them and neglects the poor, low-grade things. The reason he
does this is so he has an ideal scene. Without an ideal scene, he just
operates off technical data and produces, artwise, a low quality product
and isn't a professional. Without an ideal scene, he can never get a
preconception of the shot.
In viewing things that approach an ideal scene, the true professional
works out how they did it and when presented with similar tasks of
production, can bring off things which approach an ideal scene in his own
work.
Another thing that separates a member of the audience from a
professional is that the professional only thinks in terms of getting out
an actual product. It never enters his head that he's just there for the
ride or that being an "expert" is enough. A member of the audience has no
faintest concept or idea of getting out a product.
A professional knows the rules of the game as a matter of course so
that he can achieve in the upper strata above that, a high quality of art.
When a person simply looks at everything as to whether he "likes them"
or "not likes them," he's just an audience and he's on the wrong side of
the footlights.
This applies to a writer, a director, an actor, a cameraman, a makeup
man, a propsman, a wardrobe man, a producer, an artist, any professional.
Without this viewpoint, he never accumulates ideal scenes, so how could
he produce anything good? He never has a memory library to compare his own
products to.
Be a professional.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JUNE 1979
Remimeo
Execs
Estos Word Clearing Series 61
Crse Sups
All Staff Product Debug Series 3
URGENT-IMPORTANT
CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED
CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS
Ref: HCOB/PL 26 Mar 79R MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND
CYCLES OF ACTION
HCO PL 26 Jan 72 1 Admin Know-How Series 29
Exec Series 5
NOT DONES. HALF DONES AND
BACKLOGS
HCO PL DEBUG TECH (LRH ED 302 INT Rewritten)
THE STUDY TAPES
INCOMPLETE CYCLES
A cycle of action is the sequence that an action goes through, wherein
the action is started, is continued for as long as is required and then is
completed as planned.
To produce products one has to also have completed cycles of action. A
completed cycle of action normally results in a product.
Where steps A-H of HCO PL DEBUG TECH (LRH ED 302 INT Rewritten) have
been done to no avail, meaning products are not yet rolling out of the
area, then the tech herein is to be used as step I of DEBUG TECH to get the
area producing.
Just as a misunderstood word can prevent a person from understanding
the remainder of what is heard or written, a misunderstood can prevent a
cycle of action from completing.
This is extremely valuable data as it gives us the major reason people
don't complete cycles of action. It is utterly amazing and magical. An area
is plagued with not dones and half dones and no products resulting and one
would swear that the reasons were infiltration, sabotage, evil intentions,
you name it. But in the majority of cases it will be found that the above
discovery is operating. The person has a Mis-U on a key word involved in
the cycle of action.
The person usually doesn't realize he has a misunderstood. It is
revelatory to him when he finds it so it isn't necessarily true that he
will know. So he himself additionally has a number of wrong Whys and wrong
reasons.
There is usually one principal misunderstood that is preventing the
cycle of action from completing. This is called the "Crashing Mis-U."
APPLICATION
While finding Crashing Mis-Us is not a substitute for full Word
Clearing and while it is also true that the person can be PTS and be
engaged in creating problems, it is nevertheless uniformly true that a
Crashing Misunderstood lies somewhere in the subject matter of the cycle of
action which is not being completed.
The tech given in this HCOB can be used by anyone who has checked out on it
and drilled it. The steps given here cover metered and nonmetered Crashing
Mis-U finding. Using a Word Clearing meter will make the action faster and
more accurate but it is not vital.
The whole action does not take long to do and will save hours of purple-
faced desk pounding and frustrated attempts to get people to produce.
It is to be USED by execs, Supervisors, Cramming Officers, Estos,
missionaires, etc., etc.-anyone who is responsible for seeing that products
are gotten out.
Crashing Mis-U tech is used in debugging products. It comes as step I
of HCO PL DEBUG TECH. If any of the earlier steps are out then you can find
all the Crashing Mis-Us you like and still not get one single product.
THEORY
A cycle of action is a parallel to a cycle of understanding or a cycle
of communication. The cycle of action is the physical universe expression
of a cycle of communication. The cycle of communication occurs in the
physical universe! A misunderstood interrupts not only the cycle of
communication or understanding, but also interrupts the motion or action.
That is the discovery. A person is trying to get the product of a finished
house. He doesn't understand the word "plumbing." He may tell you that it
is because of the price of materials, that nobody can dig in that kind of
ground, that certain types of pipes aren't available, that he is having
trouble with his wife-and his supervisors and bosses will tell you that he
is just plain lazy, that he has been bribed not to, that he is a secret
drinker maybe, and even less printable Whys. But when you get right down to
it and use the Tech you find that he has a Crashing Mis-U on the word
"plumbing." He thinks it is defined as "drilling holes." Mentally this
interrupts his ability to think any thoughts through on the subject. His
cycle of understanding is being interrupted by the Crashing Mis-U. This
then has a parallel cycle, the cycle of action of trying to get the
finished house. Thus for want of understanding of a word we get the actual
physical inability to finish a cycle of action on a connected subject. I
can assure you that ethics conditions, threat of suit, physical violence,
none of these things are going to get anybody a finished house. Only when
his Crashing Mis-U "plumbing" is found and properly handled are you going
to get a finished house.
This tells you incidentally that the time track of shattered
civilizations must have been strewn with these things. It doesn't only
apply to a house, it applies to almost anything man has ever set out to
produce. It would even apply to some general who suddenly won't finish a
battle or a war. Amazingly you will discover that the Crashing Mis-U has
probably been Man's single greatest barrier to actually creating and main
taining a civilization. You have to work with the tech yourself to actually
appreciate its depth and power.
CRASHING MIS-U FINDING
Where you have a person not getting products, not completing cycles of
action despite attempts to debug per A-H of HCO PL DEBUG TECH, you have to
get in there and find the Crashing Misunderstood. It will be directly on
the subject. There are various approaches to doing this, starting very
simply and getting more complex. You would start off using the simplest
approach and then, if that didn't handle, you would go into a more thorough
handling, and so forth.
PROCEDURE
1. It is apparent or it is reported that someone is failing to complete
cycles and is not getting out his products.
2. Before even talking to him you inspect his area as regards products
per HCO PL DEBUG TECH:
A. You look for what products have been gotten out in the
past.
B. You look for products that are there completed.
C. You look for products that can be attained in the immediate
future.
D. You look for value of products as compared to overall cost of
production.
E. You look for overt products or cycles where products
continuously have to be redone, resulting in no or few products.
This requires a bit of homework.
3. CONDITIONAL: If your inspection finds he is getting out actual
products and that he is not producing overt products, correct the reports
and let him get on with it. Do not go on with the steps in this procedure.
4. Now if the earlier debug steps per HCO PL DEBUG TECH have been done
and it is obvious from your inspection that this person is still not
getting out the products he is expected to get out or should be getting out
you know that he has a Crashing MisU. You just start hunting and punching
around for the Crashing Mis-U on the subject of the products he should be
but is not getting out. "What don't you understand about that subject?"
"What Mis-U word is there on this subject?" You keep at it this way until
you get the Crashing Mis-U. On the meter you would use reads to steer him
to the area and the Mis-U.
Crashing Mis-U finding differs from regular Word Clearing in that it is
an investigatory procedure which utilizes all methods of Word Clearing and
whatever else it takes to find the Crashing Mis-U. You can use Method 2,
Method 3, Method 4, Method 5, Method 6 or Method 9 to help you find the
misunderstood. The person you are handling may be sure that the Mis-U is in
a certain issue but doesn't know what the word is. It may require Method 2
or Method 9 to actually dig it out. Often Method 5 is used whereby the Word
Clearer asks for the definition of individual words, checking to make sure
that he knows the definition as well.
The point is that you are trying to narrow down the area further and
further until you finally get the Crashing Mis-U and any method of Word
Clearing or investigation that helps you do this is legitimate.
5. You clear this word fully to VGIs (on the meter it would F/N). Don't
assume the dictionary will necessarily give the right definition-a missing
or false definition might be the root of his trouble. If no dictionary,
textbook or encyclopedia can be found that gives a satisfactory definition
for the word you are still not stopped. You can go over all of the related
material to the word and work out with him what definition has been omitted
or what is the proper definition for it. This is a last resort but it is
necessary that anyone doing Crashing Mis-U knows this as Man has not
necessarily properly defined everything in his technical sphere or culture.
WARNING: The inability to find the definitions is a rare case. Only work
out the definition when you have exhausted all possible texts and
dictionaries and have cleared all of the words you have encountered in
them. Whether you looked it up and found it or couldn't find it and had to
evolve it make sure the definition is useful to him and that it blows his
difficulty with it.
6. Assure yourself that this was his Crashing Mis-U and that it is real
to him. When he finds it he will quite often be chagrined and then go into
VGIs and cognite and may change considerably right in front of your eyes.
7. Send him to the Examiner.
8. Run some Reach and Withdraw in the area where he had difficulty to a
good win and tell him to get on with it.
9. Check back later to see that he is now completing cycles of action
and getting his products out. -If he is then you have got it. That is the
EP.
10. If he still isn't getting out the product then you haven't yet found
the Crashing Mis-U and you have some more work to do. Go over his area with
him and look for things that he has difficulty with. Often it will leap
right up at you. Get him to tell you what the difficulty is.
11. Now question him to find the Mis-U on that subject that is behind
those difficulties. Often his statement of the difficulty will contain the
Mis-U itself. On a meter you would get a read as he says it. Off the meter
you would have to take the words that he said and ask him what they meant.
For example he might say "The plumbing always seems to be the hardest
part." On a meter "plumbing" would read and you would take it up right
away. If you weren't using a meter you could say "Well what does the word
'plumbing' mean?" and he'll say "Well, it means, uh . . . 'drilling holes'"
and there you have it. Now clear the word as in step 4 above, run your
Reach and Withdraw and send him back to work.
END PHENOMENON
The end phenomenon (EP) of this action is the person now producing the
products he wasn't able to produce before and completing the cycles of
action related to his product.
The end phenomenon is not: the fellow now all VGIs and saying he can
get the products, feeling great, etc. That is all very well but IS HE NOW
GETTING OUT THE PRODUCTS? And you keep handling him with Crashing Mis-Us
and related handling until he is producing the products and then you know
you have completed the Crashing Mis-U handling.
ADDITIONAL FACTORS
There are various factors which must be known by anyone doing Crashing
Mis-U finding and used if the above simple steps do not get the desired
result of the person now tearing along getting his products.
O/Ws
Since overts and withholds stem from Mis-Us in the first place, you are
liable to run into O/Ws when doing Crashing Mis-U finding. If the person
has O/Ws in the area this will be manifested in the form of resistance to
finding the misunderstood word either overtly or covertly. An example of
this would be the person misdefining a word and then when you have him look
it up in the dictionary he says that he knew it all along. Or it could be
straight noncooperation.
If you are using the Word Clearing meter, the handling for the
situation above would be to pull the O/Ws. To do this simply ask "Do you
have any overts in the area of ?" and pull them, each one earlier similar
to F/N with all specifics until the question F/Ned on asking. Do the same
with withholds and missed withholds. Since you run the risk of missing
withholds if you try pulling withholds without a meter, in doing the
nonmetered Crashing Mis-U finding the way you would handle the above
situation is to ask the person if he has some withhold concerning the area
you are trying to handle, and getting him to tell you about it. If you do
this then you must get him meter checked to ensure nothing has been missed.
There is another manifestation which can be encountered. A Crashing Mis-
U simply cannot be found at all yet it obviously must be there. The person
seems to cooperate somewhat but no Crashing Mis-U turns up. This is again
an O/W phenomenon. The person is holding on to his withhold so hard it is
burying the Crashing Mis-U.
Again you could run the risk of missing a withhold if you simply ask him
for his withhold on the subject but we cannot rule out the fact that doing
so sometimes works. The Crashing Mis-U simply doesn't seem to exist yet by
all evidence of no products or overt products it must exist so simply
asking him if he has a withhold on the subject gives us the gain of finding
it straight off immediately and, if we meter check him afterwards to find
out if he has any more withholds, it is very likely to pay off. Once he has
gotten off the withholds the Crashing Mis-U can pop right up. When you miss
a withhold, remember, a fantastic amount of upset can be caused for the
Word Clearer or the person himself. So don't indulge in missing withholds.
Once the O/Ws have been pulled or gotten off by whichever of the above
methods, you will now be able to find the Crashing Mis-U and clear it up.
Sometimes in clearing the Mis-U you will hit a chain of overts
connected with the subject, and these will have to be cleared up or you may
not get your product. An example of this was a cleaner who could not clean.
The Crashing Mis-U found was the word "clean" and this went straight into
whole track overts which had to be fully handled. When the overts and the
Mis-Us were cleared up the person went straight out and started getting
real products.
DEFENSE MECHANISM
You may find the person has a defense mechanism which would make it
impossible to find the person's Crashing Mis-U as he believes it is OK to
have Mis-Us in that area. The defense mechanism consists of false data
which acts as a justifier for the Mis-U. An example of this would be "I
don't have to know that as I'm not a professional" or "Well I'm new to the
post" and so on. The handling would be simply to ask the person if there
was some reason why it would be OK to have Mis-Us in that subject and then
strip off the false data and justifications. Then you can recheck for the
Crashing Mis-U and you will find it is now available. (See HCOB FALSE DATA
STRIPPING)
THE WORD CLEARER'S MIS-Us
When he has found a Crashing Mis-U on the subject the Word Clearer's
first action is to himself look up the definition and the derivation of the
word so he himself understands it. He then gets it fully cleared up with
the person. This is all done right there in the Crashing Mis-U session. If
he doesn't do that he won't be able to perceive how the person has
misunderstood it or misapplied it previously.
Example: A person in charge of the lights in a theater could never get
anything lit. A Crashing Mis-U was looked for and the word "scene" was
found. However the person glibly read the dictionary definition and said he
had it already. The Word Clearer made him look up the derivation wherein it
was found that the glib person didn't understand it at all, for the person,
when asked for an example, described an actor and how he would put the
light on the actor.
The Word Clearer having looked it up first, before handing the
dictionary over, knew that a scene was a stage. It was found that the
person's Crashing Mis-U had so introverted him that he had never perceived
that a stage had backdrops, scenery and a floor. The Word Clearer
practically had to pry him out of his head to get him to see that a stage
had walls and backdrops and that these had to be lighted.
If the Word Clearer had not known the correct definition of "scene" he
would never have detected that the person thought it meant "actor" even
though the dictionary said it had to do with scenery.
Crashing Mis-U tech would have failed as the person was very convincing
as to how he knew it all already yet in the example was giving a totally
incorrect demonstration.
Showers of light broke through when the person realized for the first time
that he had to light the whole stage and had been in total mystery why
people kept yelling at him. This had been going on for a long, long time in
the person's job and was making him a total failure at it.
PRACTICAL USAGE
Always ask for instances of practical usage from the person you have
found a Crashing Mis-U on. From these you can detect if he's got it and if
he hasn't got it he may have to work and work to clear it further.
The end phenomenon of Crashing Mis-U tech is not finding the Crashing
Mis-U but getting the person totally straight on it and actually getting
out the product.
DEBUG TECH
Crashing Mis-U finding is an integral part of debug tech as covered
fully in HCO PL DEBUG TECH. It comes as step I of the whole procedure. When
products are not getting out, cycles are not being completed, there will
invariably be Crashing Mis-Us but there may be other factors involved which
also have to be resolved. The handling is just to go through the steps of
the HCO PL, including Crashing Mis-U finding (step 1) and Product Clearing
(step J). You may find more Crashing Mis-Us come up during or after the
Product Clearing.
The whole point is that you use the whole debug tech procedure without
trying to short cut it. Otherwise you get the ridiculous situation of
clearing up the fellow's Crashing Mis-U on "plumbing" and then find he
can't get out the product of a finished house because there are no pipes
and won't be any for 3 months because the owner can't afford them. This all
has to be resolved.
IMPORTANT NOTE
Since the sole purpose of this debug tech is to get the person or area
producing what it should be producing you would not continue past a point
where this had been achieved. So for example, if after step C of HCO PL
DEBUG TECH had been done (any Mis-Us on issues related to the area of
production had been cleared up) the person was turning out great products
in the expected quantity and time period, you would not then start looking
for Crashing Mis-Us. This would act as harassment, not help. Similarly,
don't use any other step of A-M of the above PL where it does not apply.
One should let people have their successes. Once you have achieved what
is desired with this tech, don't carry on.
The rule is: DON'T CONTINUE DEBUGGING PAST THE POINT WHERE THE PERSON
OR AREA HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY DEBUGGED AND PRODUCTS ARE NOW ROLLING.
And you would know it was debugged because products of the expected
quality would be coming out of the area in the expected quantity.
GRADIENT APPROACH
The whole idea is to try the simplest approach first and then if that
doesn't work go deeper.
The end phenomena for all this is a person cheerfully and willingly
getting his products and these appearing visible in the physical universe.
EXAMPLES
This is how it might go: you might find yourself in the position of
being responsible for seeing that the house, in the example given earlier
on this bulletin, got
finished. You notice that the deadline has been exceeded by weeks and still
there is no house.
The first thing to do would be the inspection as in step 2 of the
procedure above. You would discover that the house has no plumbing; that is
what is holding up its completion. Points A to H in HCO PL DEBUG TECH have
been gone over but things still aren't moving. So you approach the
contractor personally and go over this with him. You start hunting and
punching around for the Mis-U. Ask him "Is it possible that there is some
word you don't fully understand in the area of building this house?" And
he'll say: "Well, no-it's just that I don't have enough men to do the
plumbing." (Now you already know from step E of your prior inspection that
he does have adequate personnel.) So you say "Well, what about plumbing? Is
there some word connected with plumbing that you don't get?" He'll say "No,
but I've always had trouble with it." Now you ask him "What does 'plumbing'
mean?" And when he says, "Everybody knows that plumbing means drilling
holes," you have his Crashing Mis-U. As you clear this up his initial
embarrassment will turn into floods of relief and off he will go and get
the house finished up in no time.
Now if you were able to use a Word Clearing meter, so much the better.
You would put him on the meter and ask him something like: "Now on the
subject of building houses is it possible you could have a misunderstood?"
The meter will read on this and you use the read to steer him to the area
and find the misunderstood word. This is then cleared to a floating needle
(F/N) and very good indicators (VGIs).
It might not be as straightforward as above. The case could arise where
there was plenty of evidence that the person has a Crashing Mis-U yet,
despite arduous search, nothing comes up. You would then ask the person:
"Is there something about all this you haven't told me?" If your TRs are
good and you don't have a challenging or accusative attitude he will come
up with it: "I can't finish the house because the machine that cuts and
bends pipes is broken." With a bit of further questioning you find that he
broke the machine and has been withholding this for weeks and didn't even
dare mention that it needed repair for fear of being punished. A simple
meter check would ensure that nothing was missed. Then up would pop the
misunderstood on "plumbing" which he thought meant drilling holes. No
wonder he broke the machine: he was trying to drill holes with it! So now
with his withhold off and his MisU cleared up he will feel immensely
relieved and will most likely be able to go right off and finish up the
house. At the most you might need to product clear him and run some Reach
and Withdraw in the area per the issues on Product Clearing in this series.
CASE HISTORIES
Here are some actual case histories to show how Crashing Mis-U finding
goes and the sort of things one might expect to come across and have to
handle in order to debug a cycle or product with this tech.
CASE A: This was a senior executive who was on the verge of being removed
from post. The general manager was impatient with the lack of products from
that area.
A. The Word Clearer inspected the executive's department and found that
the main area of difficulty seemed to be handling personnel.
B. The Word Clearer put the executive on the meter and asked him if
there were any products he should be getting out but wasn't. No
Crashing Mis-U came up on this directly.
C. By two-way communication the Word Clearer confirmed that the main
area of difficulty was handling personnel.
D. He took the words that were directly related to the area mentioned-
"personnel," "staff," etc.-and asked the executive what each one meant.
He checked the dictionary to ensure the person had a full understanding
of the words. The exec seemed fine on these.
E. There was one word the executive seemed to have some hesitation on
so the definition of that word was word cleared Method 9. A few words
were cleared up but none of them turned out to be the Crashing
Misunderstood.
F. The area of difficulty was further narrowed down by two way comm to
"the obtaining and posting of personnel."
G. Words relating to this area were checked. Some of the definitions
were M9ed to make sure the exec really did have them straight-still no
Crashing Mis-U was found.
H. The executive originated an area of difficulty to do with handling
authority that he felt was interfering with his ability to obtain and
post personnel. No MisUs were found in this area however.
I. The Word Clearer asked for overts and withholds in the area ("Is
there something you're not telling about this area?", "Is there
something you've done you don't want known?" etc.) but none were found.
J. He then checked for false data (something that would justify having
misunderstoods on that subject) and found that the exec was loaded with
false data on the subject of authority. This was handled by two way
comm-it did not take much to clean up as the exec was realizing by this
time where his trouble was coming from and was only too willing to get
it sorted out.
K. The word "authority" was found as the Crashing Misunderstood. This
became obvious as soon as the false data came off. This word was fully
cleared to a floating needle and very good indicators and the executive
volunteered that he felt ready to go back on post and produce.
The Word Clearer ended off and returned the executive to work. He
started producing actual products and doing well.
CASE B.: This was a technician in a highly specialized and complex field
who was having difficulty with his job and was unable to get approval on
some tests that were urgently needed.
A. An inspection of his area revealed the situation to be exactly as
described.
B. The Word Clearer put him on the meter, oriented him to the situation
and asked him: "Is there any single misunderstood word in the area of
these tests?"
C. A long search ensued in which several words were cleared, none of
which turned out to be the Crashing Mis-U.
D. The Word Clearer then checked for a withhold and found out that the
technician had never understood an important dispatch relating to the
cycle and had been withholding the fact. This withhold was cleared up
to a floating needle.
E. This was followed by further search for the misunderstood which
uncovered an area of upset and losses to do with technical writing.
F. The Word Clearer checked for the misunderstood that must have
preceded the losses and the Crashing Mis-U was found-a very basic
technical word in the subject.
G. He attempted to clear the word with a dictionary but found no
adequate definition .
H. Encyclopedias and textbooks were consulted but none of them had a
useful definition .
I. Eventually, by combining textbooks and working out what it should
be, a workable definition was arrived at and the subject became clear
to the technician who was greatly relieved.
The technician returned to work and started producing. The very next
set of tests submitted were approved.
CASE C: This case was an executive who was having trouble getting people
in his area to produce. The actions below were done unmetered.
A. The product inspection showed the executive to be unable to get his
juniors to produce.
B. He arrived for the Crashing Mis-U finding quite upset and this had
to be handled before anything else.
C. The Word Clearer went over his upset with him and sorted it out to a
point where he was willing to go ahead with the action.
D. Various words were checked ("What does 'junior' mean?" "What is the
definition of 'executive'?") and so forth. No Crashing Mis-U was found.
E. The area of difficulty was narrowed down further to "getting
compliance."
F. On checking, the Word Clearer found that the exec had a Crashing Mis-
U on the word "compliance" which was cleared to very good indicators.
The executive went back to work and found he could now handle his
juniors.
CASE D: This person was in charge of briefing missions. He had recently
had trouble with this and some missions had fired without full briefing
resulting in failures.
A. The Word Clearer asked him, on the meter, if there was anything
concerning his post he was having difficulty with.
B. The difficulty was narrowed down by two-way comm until it was
established that he felt he couldn't brief them fully due to lack of
time.
C. The Word Clearer checked for a Crashing Mis-U concerning this
difficulty. None was found.
D. He then asked if there was something the person was withholding
about the subject. Several chains of overts were taken up, each one to
a floating needle, until the question itself produced a floating needle
on asking.
E. The Word Clearer again asked for a Crashing Mis-U in the area and
one of the words in the person's own post title was found and cleared.
This was the Crashing Mis-U.
The person was then able to get out his products.
CASE E: This was an auditor who was being product cleared on her post.
A. The Product Clearer discovered that there was a certain part of her
post that this auditor could not handle. It was a certain aspect of
handling the preclear
B. He asked her if there was one single Mis-U in the area, and helped
her trace it, using the meter reads.
C. The Crashing Mis-U was found and cleared in the dictionary to very
good indicators.
D. The auditor was then able to complete the Product Clearing and get
back to work, her main difficulty no longer impeding her from getting
products.
The above case histories show the variety of situations that can come
up and the handlings that would be done. They are by no means all the
situations that can arise in doing Crashing Mis-U finding.
CAUTIONS
Make sure you guide him on the subject of products all the time. You
could get right off the track and find yourself clearing up a whole subject
that had nothing to do with getting out his product. An example would be
trying to clear up the whole of chemistry on a photographer. There is
chemistry involved in photography: the film is developed and so forth with
chemicals. But the person is a photographer, not a photo laboratory
technician, so he does not need to know all of chemistry to get his
product.
Another point is that sometimes a person will have a Crashing Mis-U
cleared up on himself and immediately suppose that this is the Crashing Mis-
U everyone else has. This is not necessarily the case. When one has a
Crashing Mis-U on "crackers" it is not necessarily true that everyone else
has a Crashing Mis-U on "crackers." The* Crashing Mis-Us will be different.
It is their Mis-Us one is after.
REPAIR
If the action bogs down and can't be sorted out, or the person becomes
upset during or after Crashing Mis-U finding, then the difficulty should be
sorted out right away with a Crashing Mis-U Repair List. This list is done
on a meter by someone qualified to do so. A botched or bogged Crashing Mis-
U finding must be repaired within 24 hours.
EFFECTS OF CRASHING MIS-Us
You can tell someone has a Crashing Mis-U because when you start to
question them about the cycle of action or demand the products they will go
robotic on you. They sometimes just stand there gaping at you and won't
even answer your question. They won't even be able to talk to you. There's
another manifestation you will come up against and that is the person
becoming annoyed with you. This indicates either that he was getting out
products in the first place, or that he had a withhold in addition to a
Crashing Mis-U.
The solution is not to immediately shoot them for not getting out the
product. Find their Crashing Mis-U. If they get annoyed then find out which
of the above it was and handle. And then the justice factor would consist
of disciplining them for going past misunderstoods without clearing them.
You have to teach someone to get in his own ethics in this respect so that
others do not have to take justice actions on him.
SUMMARY
Well, here you have the tech that will enable you to debug failures to
produce the products required of him. The person using this tech has to
learn it well and become practiced in its application. Then he will get the
full benefit of it and total reality on its power.
Let's get busy and, along with the remainder of debug tech, find the
crashing Mis-U when products aren't coming off the line.
This is indeed miracle tech so let's go get some miracles!
LRH:dr.gal L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1979 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 18 JUNE 1979
Remimeo
Tech
Word Clearers Product Debug Series 4
Auditors
C/Ses Word Clearing Series 62
THE CRASHING MIS-U REPAIR LIST-LC1
Ref: HCOB 17 Jun 79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY
TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF
ACTION AND PRODUCTS
The Crashing Mis-U Repair List is the list to use in repairing Crashing
Mis-U finding. It can be done on the spot by the person doing the Crashing
Mis-U finding or in session by an auditor. The Crashing Mis-U Repair List
is used in the event of a bog or trouble during Crashing Mis-U finding or a
red tagged exam after a Crashing MisU finding session. It can also be done
if, after the fact of a Crashing Mis-U being found, the person is still not
getting out his products or is not completing cycles of action in his area.
(Note: The person could be up against a new Crashing Mis-U on a whole
different cycle of action in the same area.)
If after the Crashing Mis-U Repair List has been done and fully
handled, there seems to be some other bypassed charge or BIs connected with
the Crashing Mis-U finding, a C/S 53 or WCCL should be done. This would be
determined by the C/S.
Any person using this list must have excellent TRs and be able to make
a list read and correctly interpret E-Meter reads. They must also be
drilled on this correction list and have their High Crime checkouts done on
this list as well as HCOB 17 Jun 79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED
CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS.
This list can be assessed Method 3 or Method 5. Each line that reads is
carried to F/N.
0. HAVE YOU FAILED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT A "CRASHING MISUNDERSTOOD" IS?
_________
(Check and clear any words in the above that read on the meter.)
1. WAS CRASHING MIS-U FINDING DONE WHEN YOU ALREADY HAD AN UPSET?
_________
(Handle the ARC break to F/N VGIs.)
2. DID YOU BECOME UPSET BECAUSE OF THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING?
_________
(Handle the ARC break to F/N VGIs.)
3. WAS THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING DONE WHILE YOU WERE WORRYING ABOUT
SOMETHING ELSE? _________
(Handle the problem to F/N VGIs.)
4. DID THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING CAUSE YOU TO BECOME WORRIED OR
CONCERNED? _________
(Handle the problem to F/N VGIs.)
5. DURING YOUR CRASHING MIS-U FINDING WAS THERE SOMETHING YOU WERE NOT
SAYING? _________
(Handle by usual missed W/H pulling per HCOB 12 Feb 62 and HCOB 3 May
62.)
6. WAS THERE SOMETHING YOU'D DONE YOU WEREN'T SAYING? _________
(Handle as in No. 5.)
7. WAS THERE SOMETHING YOU WEREN'T SAYING ABOUT THE AREA THAT WAS BEING
ADDRESSED? _________
(Handle as in No. 5.)
8. WAS THERE SOMETHING YOU'D DONE IN THE AREA BEING ADDRESSED THAT YOU
WEREN'T SAYING? _________
(Handle as in No. 5.)
9. WAS THE WRONG AREA ADDRESSED? _________
(Indicate to F/N. Get him to the W/Cer to complete the Crashing Mis-U
finding. )
10. WAS THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING DONE ON THE WRONG PRODUCT?
_________
(Handle as in No. 9 above.)
11. COULDN'T YOU FIND THE CRASHING MIS-U? _________
(Indicate and take it E/S to F/N if necessary. Get him back to the
W/Cer for completion of the action.)
12. WAS THERE NO CRASHING MIS-U IN THE AREA IN THE FIRST PLACE?
_________
(Indicate that the Crashing Mis-U finding was an unnecessary action
and take it to F/N.)
13. WAS THE CRASHING MIS-U FOUND ONLY SIMILAR TO THE ACTUAL CRASHING MIS-
U? _________
(Indicate and get an F/N. Send him back to the W/Cer to find the
actual Crashing Mis-U.)
14. IS THERE ANOTHER CRASHING MIS-U IN THE AREA? _________
(Indicate to F/N. Send to W/Cer to handle.)
15. IS THE WORD FOUND STILL MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
(Get it fully cleared up to F/N.)
16. DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS GOING ON? _________
(Clear up the questions and confusions to F/N and get him back to the
W/Cer.)
17. WAS THERE METER OR F/N TROUBLE? _________
(Indicate and clean it up with false TA handling or L1C, etc.)
18. WERE AREAS THAT YOU WERE NOT HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH TAKEN UP?
_________
(Indicate that these areas should not have been taken up. Take it to
F/N.)
19. WERE AREAS THAT YOU WERE HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH NOT TAKEN UP?
_________
(Indicate and get an F/N. Send back to the W/Cer for handling.)
20. DID AN AREA YOU FELT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HANDLED NOT GET TAKEN UP OR
HANDLED? _________
(Indicate. Find out what area to F/N and send back to the W/Cer for
handling.)
21. DID YOU GET INVALIDATED? _________
(Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.)
22. DID YOU GET EVALUATED FOR? _________
(Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.)
23. DID THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING ANNOY YOU? _________
(Determine if (a) he has O/Ws as well as a Crashing Mis-U or (b) the
Crashing Mis-U finding wasn't necessary in the first place. Handle
accordingly.)
24. WAS THE CRASHING MIS-U FINDING DONE IN THE MIDDLE OF SOME OTHER
INCOMPLETE CYCLE? _________
(Indicate the BPC and take it to F/N.)
25. WERE YOU MADE TO GO E/S ON CRASHING MIS-U FINDING WHILE IN THE NON-
INTERFERENCE ZONE? _________
(Indicate it as an incorrect action and it should not have been done
and get your F/N.)
26. DO YOU NOT BELIEVE YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS? _________
(Clear him up on Word Clearing Series 60R. Handle his Mis-Us and get
his agreement to do the action unless it is determined it was an
unnecessary action. Take this to F/N.)
27. DID FALSE DATA GET IN YOUR WAY? _________
(Strip off the false data per HCOB FALSE DATA STRIPPING. Take it to
F/N.)
28. IS IT ACTUALLY OK TO HAVE MISUNDERSTOODS IN THE AREA? _________
(Get why this is OK and strip off the defense mechanism per the
Crashing Mis-U HCOB. Take it to F/N.)
29. IS THERE SOME OTHER WORD CLEARING ERROR? _________
(Indicate. Find out what and handle or do a WCCL if necessary.)
30. WERE YOU NOT HAVING ANY TROUBLE WITH YOUR PRODUCTS IN THE FIRST
PLACE? _________
(Get the data. If this is the case indicate that the Crashing Mis-U
finding was an unnecessary action. Take it to F/N.)
31. ARE THERE OTHER PRODUCT DEBUG ACTIONS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN?
_________
(2WC to F/N. Program him to get Product Debugging per HCO PL DEBUG
TECH.)
32. AREN'T YOU HATTED? _________
(2WC to F/N. Program him to get hatted.)
33. IS YOUR PRODUCT TOTALLY UNKNOWN TO YOU? _________
(2WC to F/N. Program him to be Product Cleared.)
34. ARE YOU LACKING PRODUCT CLEARING? _________
(Handle as in No. 33 above.)
35. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO ANTAGONISTIC PEOPLE? _________
(2WC to F/N. Get the PTS Clay Table Handling done or corrected to
EP.)
36. WAS YOUR CRASHING MIS-U FINDING OVERRUN? _________
(Indicate and rehab.)
37. ARE YOU HAVING CASE TROUBLE? _________
(Assess and handle a C/S 53.)
38. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(Find out what and handle or do the appropriate correction list and
handle.)
39. WAS THERE NOTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE? _________
(Indicate and get it to F/N.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JULY 1979
Remimeo
CRASHING MIS-U DEFINITION
I started calling it Crashing Mis-U because it crashed the person.
That's what crashed the subject and crashed the person. That's why it's
called a Crashing Mis-U.
It's what crashes something across the dynamics.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:mj.dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JULY 1979
Remimeo
All Supervisors
All Word Clearers Product Debug Series 5
Execs
Estos
Cram Offs Word Clearing Series 63
All Staff
THE "ELUSIVE" MIS-U OR CRASHING MIS-U
Ref: HCOB 17 Jun 79 W/C Series 61, Product Debug
Series 3, URGENT-IMPORTANT.
CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO
COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION
AND PRODUCTS
HCOB 30 Jan 73RB W/C Series 46RB, METHOD 9
Rev. 1.6.79 WORD CLEARING THE RIGHT WAY
HCOB 18 Jun 79 W/C Series 62, Product Debug
Series 4 THE CRASHING MIS-U
REPAIR LIST-LC1
HCOB/HCO PL
26 Mar 79R Esto Series 35R, W/C Series
Rev. 25.5.79 60R MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND
CYCLES OF ACTION
Miraculous as it is, a Word Clearer must be aware of the fact that M9
Word Clearing does not uncover false data, Crashing Mis-Us, overts,
withholds or PTSness. Other tech exists to handle these. However they also,
sometimes in a shadowy way, make their appearance doing M9. People doing M9
are doing it to get something understood or get some order done or get some
product actually made and out. In most cases M9 will produce a marked gain.
However, when it doesn't work, one of the above is also present. Handling
of these is covered in detail in other HCOBs.
However, the item the M9er is most likely to collide with in situations
where M9 is really not getting much done is the mysterious Crashing Mis-U.
A Crashing Mis-U, while it is always sitting right there in PT, big as
life, can sometimes appear to be elusive. It eludes the most conscientious
Word Clearer and the person himself, despite honest efforts to find it.
Let's say you've made an exhaustive search for the CRMU, you've hunted
and punched in the area of his products, you've word cleared him on the
texts covering his products and you've found and cleared some misunderstood
words, none of which are IT. You've done the full CRMU and Product Debug
procedure by the book and you still haven't gotten the Crashing Mis-U-as
evidenced by no products.
At this point you could suspect one of the following:
1. The word that has caused him to crash may be right there in plain
view, it does appear in the texts and orders covering the person's post
and products, but it has been missed.
Why? Because the Crashing Mis-U (which is not your ordinary common
garden variety of misunderstood word) will not always show up for what
it is in M9ing. The word may appear in the materials but the person
reads it with no stumble or reaction whatsoever, as he is so certain he
knows it and his misunderstanding of it is so obscured by false data
and false definitions. It doesn't even read on the meter on Method 2 or
4 because it's way below his awareness.
So you wouldn't just assume there was nothing there because the word
didn't turn up on Method 9 or Methods 2 or 4. You'd need to move in
with Method 5 or 6 and probably also False Data Stripping in a case
like this to really pry it into view.
Or:
2. The Crashing Mis-U may not be on the subject of the product itself
but in an area related to the subject. If this is suspected you look
for the CRMU in the related areas and it's very likely you'll come up
with the prize!
The reason it wasn't found in the first place is because the word
didn't appear in the materials he was word cleared on and it didn't
come up in a search in the area of his products. But it was sitting
there, all the time, in an adjacent, a related area!
In two cases recently where staff members were being crammed on rejects
of their products this phenomena turned up and was used and it all
straightened out nicely!
The watchword is: you utilize all methods of Word Clearing and whatever
else it takes to find the Crashing Mis-U.
ALERT RE METHOD 9
The data above applies to routine Method 9 Word Clearing as well as to
Crashing Mis-U finding. Thus, if you've M9ed the person on his post
materials and he's not getting it or making it, realize that he may be
sliding over an MU or even a Crashing Mis-U where the word actually appears
in the materials and is obscured for the above reasons. Or that the
misunderstood may be in an area related to the subject and the word itself
doesn't appear in the text you're handling.
Method 9 is a superlative Word Clearing tool. Word Clearers must keep
it effective, and not permit that effectiveness to be dimmed by a failure
to know and use the data in this bulletin.
So you check the related areas where it's indicated, or you marry up
routine Method 9 with Crashing Mis-U finding and all of its steps where the
person isn't making it otherwise. And you'll find the elusive misunderstood
or Crashing Mis-U is not so elusive after all. It will come plainly into
view-ripe for the plucking!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1979
Remimeo Issue I
Word Clearers
Tech
Staff Word Clearing Series 64
THE MISUNDERSTOOD WORD
DEFINED
Ref: HCOB 23 Mar 78RA Word Clearing Series 59RA
Rev. 14.11.79 CLEARING WORDS
HCOB 25 Jun 71R Word Clearing Series 5R
Rev. 25.11.74 BARRIERS TO STUDY
HCOB 26 Mar 79RB Esto Series 35RB
Rev. 2.9.79 Word Clearing Series 60RB
Product Debug Series 7R
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND
CYCLES OF ACTION
"MIS-UNDERSTOOD" or "NOT-UNDERSTOOD" are terms used to define any error
or omission in comprehension of a word, concept, symbol or status.
Most people go around thinking that a misunderstood is just something
they obviously don't know-a "not-understood."
A "not-understood" is a misunderstood but there are additional ways a
person can misunderstand a word.
A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD OR SYMBOL IS DEFINED AS A WORD OR SYMBOL FOR WHICH
THE STUDENT HAS:
1. A FALSE {TOTALLY WRONG) DEFINITION: A definition that has no
relationship to the actual meaning of the word or symbol whatsoever.
Example: The person reads or hears the word "cat" and thinks that "cat"
means "box." You can't get more wrong.
Example: A person sees an equals sign (=) and thinks it means to
subtract something twice.
2. AN INVENTED DEFINITION: An invented definition is a version of a
false definition. The person has made it up himself or has been given an
invented definition. Not knowing the actual definition he invents one for
it. This is sometimes difficult to detect because he is certain he knows
it, after all he invented it himself. There is enough protest preceding his
invention of it to make it read on a meter. In such a case he will be
certain he knows the definition of the word or symbol.
Example: The person when very young was always called "a girl" by his
pals when he refused to do anything daring. He invents the definition
of "girl" to be "a cowardly person."
Example: A person never knew the meaning of the symbol for an
exclamation point (!) but seeing it in comic strips as representing
swear words invents the definition for it "a foul curse" and regards it
accordingly in everything he reads.
3. AN INCORRECT DEFINITION: A definition that is not right but may have
some relationship to the word or symbol or be in a similar category.
Example: The person reads or hears the word "computer" and thinks it
is "typewriter." This is an incorrect meaning for "computer" even
though a typewriter and a computer are both types of machines.
Example: A person thinks a period (.) after an abbreviation means that
you halt in reading at that point.
4. AN INCOMPLETE DEFINITION: A definition that is inadequate.
Example: The person reads the word "office" and thinks it means
"room." The definition of the word "office" is: "a room or building in
which a person transacts his business or carries on his stated
occupation." (Ref: Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English
Language) The person's definition is incomplete for the word "office."
Example: The person sees an apostrophe (') and knows that it means
that something is owned ('s) but does not know that it also is used to
show that a letter has been left out of a word. He sees the word
"can't" and immediately tries to figure out who can is.
5. AN UNSUITABLE DEFINITION: A definition that does not fit the word as
it is used in the context of the sentence one has heard or read.
Example: The person hears the sentence: "I am dressing a turkey." The
person's understanding of "dressing" is "putting clothes on." That is
one definition of "dressing" but it is an unsuitable definition for the
word as it is used in the sentence he has heard. Because he has an
unsuitable definition he thinks someone is putting clothes on a turkey.
As a result the sentence he has heard doesn't really make sense to him.
The definition of "dressing" that correctly applies in the sentence he
has heard is: "to prepared for use as food, by making ready to cook, or
by cooking." (Ref: The Oxford English Dictionary)
The person will only truly understand what he is hearing when he has
fully cleared the word "dressing" in all its meanings. as he will then
also have the definition that correctly applies in the context.
Example: The person sees a dash (-) in the sentence: "I finished
numbers 3 - 7 today." He thinks a dash is a minus sign, realizes you
cannot subtract 7 from 3 and so cannot understand it.
6. A HOMONYMIC (one word which has two or more distinctly separate
meanings) DEFINITION: A homonym is a word that is used to designate several
different things which have totally different meanings; or a homonym can be
one of two or more words that have the same sound, sometimes the same
spelling, but differ in meaning.
Example: The person reads the sentence: "I like to box." The person
understands this sentence to mean that someone likes to put things in
"containers."
The person has the right meaning for the word "box," but he has the
wrong word! There is another word "box" which is being used in the
sentence he has just read and means: "to fight another in a boxing
match." (Ref: Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English
Language)
The person has a misunderstood because he has a homonymic
definition for the word "box" and will have to clear the second word
"box" before he understands the sentence.
Example: The person sees a plus sign (+) and as it resembles a cross
he thinks it is something religious.
Example: The person hears the word "period" in the sentence: "It was a
disorderly period in history" and knowing that "period" comes at the
end of a sentence and means stop, supposes that the world ended at that
point.
Example: Homonymic misunderstoods can also occur when a person does
not know the informal or slang usage of a word. The person hears
someone on the radio singing: "When my Honey walks down the street."
The person thinks a "thick, sweet, yellow or golden liquid, good to
eat, that bees make out of the nectar they collect from flowers" is
walking down the street! He doesn't know the informal definition of
"honey" which is: "sweet one: a pet name." which is how it is being
used in the song. (Ref: Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the
English Language)
7. A SUBSTITUTE {SYNONYM-a word which has a similar but not the same
meaning) DEFINITION: A substitute definition occurs when a person uses a
synonym for the definition of a word. A synonym is not a definition. A
synonym is a word having a meaning similar to that of another word.
Example: The person reads the word "portly" and thinks the definition
of the word is "fat." "Fat" is a synonym for the word "portly." The
person has a misunderstood because the word "portly" means: "of a
stately appearance and carriage; impressive, especially on account of
size." (Ref: Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English
Language) The person does not have the full meaning of "portly" if he
thinks it just means "fat."
Knowing synonyms for words increases your vocabulary but it does
not mean you understand the meaning of a word. Learn the full
definition for a word as well as its synonyms.
8. AN OMITTED {MISSING} DEFINITION: An omitted definition is a
definition of a word that the person is missing or is omitted from the
dictionary he is using.
Example: The person hears the line "The food here is too rich." This
person knows two definitions for the word "rich." He knows that "rich"
means "having much money, land, goods, etc." and "wealthy people." Neither
of these definitions make much sense to him in the sentence he has just
heard. He cannot understand what food could have to do with having a lot of
money.
Omitted definitions can come about from using dinky dictionaries.
If the person had looked up "rich" in a small paperback dictionary, he
would probably still be stuck with his misunderstood. A dinky
dictionary probably will not give him the definition he needs. In order
to understand the word he would have to get a good sized dictionary to
ensure it gives him the omitted definition which is: "having in a high
degree qualities pleasing to the senses; luscious to the taste: often
implying an unwholesome excess of butter, fats, flavoring, etc." (Ref:
Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English Language)
Example: The person reads "He estimated the light at f 5.6." He can't
figure what this "f" is, so he looks up "f" in the American Heritage
Dictionary and wonders if it is temperature or money or sports for
"foul" or maybe the money "franc." The text doesn't refer to France so
he can't figure it out. Omitted in the American Heritage is the
photography definition of "f" which simply means "the number which
shows the width of the hole the light goes through in the lens." The
moral of this is to have enough dictionaries around.
NOTE: It can occur that an accurate definition for a word is not given
in any dictionary which is an error in the language itself.
9. A NO-DEFINITION: A no-definition is a "not-understood" word or
symbol.
Example: The person reads the sentence "The business produced no
lucre." No understanding occurs, as he has no definition for "lucre."
The word means:
"money, especially as the object of greed; gain." (Ref: Funk and
Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English Language) It isn't that he
has the word incorrectly, unsuitable or any other way defined, he has
no definition for it at all. He has never looked it up and gotten it
defined. Thus he does not understand it. The definition does not exist
for him until he looks it up and gets it clearly understood .
Example: The person sees a dot at the end of a word on a printed page
and having no definition for "a period (.)" tends to run all of his
sentences together.
10. A REJECTED DEFINITION: A rejected definition is a definition of a
word which the person will not accept. The reasons why he will not accept
it are usually based on emotional reactions connected with it. The person
finds the definition degrading to himself or his friends or group in some
imagined way or restimulative to him in some fashion. Although he may have
a total misunderstood on the word he may refuse to have it explained or
look it up.
Example: The person refuses to look up the word "mathematics." He
doesn't know what it means, he doesn't want to know what it means, and
he won't have anything to do with it. A discussion of why he refuses to
look it up discloses that he was expelled from school because he
flunked with violence his first month of his first course in
mathematics. If he were to realize that he flunked because he didn't
know what he was supposed to study he would then be willing to look the
word up.
Example: The person refuses to look up the definition of asterisk (*).
On discussion it turns out that every time he sees an asterisk on the
page he knows the material will be "very hard to read" and is
"literary," "difficult" and "highbrow."
Discussion of why he won't look it up usually reveals and releases
the emotional charge connected with it which he may never have looked
at before. Properly handled he will now want to look it up, having
gained an insight into why he wouldn't.
Any word you come across which fits one or more of the above
definitions of a misunderstood word or symbol must be cleared up, using a
good size dictionary or more than one dictionary or text book or
encyclopedia.
It is catastrophic to go on past or ignore a misunderstood word or
symbol as one simply will not understand what he is studying.
A student must discipline himself not to go past misunderstood words.
He should learn to recognize from his reaction to what he is reading,
especially the mental blankness which usually ensues right after one, that
he has gone by a misunderstood. He should look them up and get them fully
defined before going on with his reading. Students must be persuaded to do
this. It is a self-discipline that has to be learned.
The definitions of "misunderstood" and "not-understood" and their
different types, must be clearly understood by a person seeking to clear
them in himself and others. The commonest error in Word Clearing is for the
person being word cleared to believe that a misunderstood is something he
simply does not know. With this limited definition he cannot adequately be
word cleared nor can he adequately word clear others. So these definitions
of "misunderstood" and "not-understood" should be very well known as it
will often be necessary to clarify them to the person being word cleared.
Good reading.
LRH:gal L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright � 1979 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 AUGUST 1979
Remimeo
Sups (Also issued as
Tech HCO PL 7 Aug 79
Execs FALSE DATA STRIPPING)
ALL STAFF
Product Debug Series 8
Esto Series 36
FALSE DATA STRIPPING
(Ref: The Study Tapes
Dianetic Auditor's Bulletin Vol I Numbers 1-2
STANDARD PROCEDURE
Tech Vol 1. pgs. 15-20
Dianetic Auditor's Bulletin Vol I Number 3
HOW TO RELEASE A CHRONIC SOMATIC
Tech Vol 1, pgs. 24-26
NOTES ON THE
LECTURES Pgs. 52-66,112-1 13)
When a person is not functioning well on his post, on his job or in
life, at the bottom of his difficulties will often be found unknown basic
definitions and laws or false definitions, false data and false laws,
resulting in an inability to think with the words and rules of that
activity and an inability to perform the simplest required functions The
person will remain unfamiliar with the fundamentals of his activity, at
times appearing idiotic, because of these not-defined and falsely defined
words.
Verbal hatting is the main source of false definitions and false data.
Someone who "knows" tells someone else a definition or a datum. The person
now thinks he knows the definition (even though nothing in the field makes
any sense to him). The word may not even read on the meter during
misunderstood checks because the person "thinks he knows."
A politician is told by an advisor, "It doesn't matter how much money
the government spends. It is good for the society." The politician uses
this "rule" and the next thing you know, inflation is driving everybody to
starvation and the government to bankruptcy. The politician, knowing he was
told this on the very best authority, does not spot it as false data, but
continues to use it right up to the point where the angry mobs stand him up
in front of a firing squad and shoot him down. And the pity of it is that
the politician never once suspected that there was anything false about the
data, even though he couldn't work with it.
There is no field in all the society where false data is not rampant.
"Experts," "Advisors," "Friends," "Families" seldom go and look at the
basic texts on subjects, even when these are known to exist, but indulge in
all manner of interpretations and even outright lies to seem wise or
expert. The cost, in terms of lost production and damaged equipment is
enormous. You will see it in all sectors of society. People cannot think
with the fundamentals of their work. They goof. They ruin things. They have
to redo what they have already done.
You'll find people whose estimate of the environment is totally
perverted to the point they're walking around literally in a fog. The guy
looks at a tree and the reality of the tree is blurred by the "fact" that
"trees are made by God" so he won't take care of the tree because he is
convinced.
What we're trying to cure in people is the inability to think with data.
This was traced by me to false data as a phenomenon additional to
misunderstood words, although the misunderstood word plays a role in it and
will have to be allowed for.
When a person is having difficulty in an area or on a post, when he
can't seem to apply what he has "learned" or what he is studying or when he
can't get through a specific drill or exercise in his training materials,
you would suspect he has false data in that area or on those materials. If
he is to use it at all effectively he must first sort out the true facts
regarding it from the conflicting bits and pieces of information or opinion
he has acquired. This eliminates the false data and lets him get on with
it.
INABILITY TO HAT
We are looking here at a brand new discovery I have made which is that
it can be nearly impossible to hat anyone who is sitting on false data on
the subject you are trying to hat him on. This is the primary reason people
cannot be hatted and False Data Stripping therefore enables a person to be
hatted even though other approaches have failed. This is a very valuable
discovery-it solves the problem of inability to hat or train.
SOURCES
False data on a subject can come from any number of sources. In the
process of day-to-day living people encounter and often accept without
inspection all sorts of ideas which may seem to make sense but don't.
Advertising, newspapers, TV and other media are packed with such material.
The most profound false data can come out of texts such as Stanislavsky (a
Russian actor and director); and even mothers have a hand in it, such as
"children should be seen and not heard."
Where a subject, such as art, contains innumerable authorities and
voluminous opinions you may find that any and all textbooks under that
heading reek with false data. Those who have studied study tech will recall
that the validity of texts is an important factor in study.
Therefore it is important that any supervisor or teacher seeking to use
False Data Stripping must utilize basic workable texts. These are most
often found to have been written by the original discoverer of the subject
and when in doubt avoid texts which are interpretations of somebody else's
work. In short, choose only textual material which is closest to the basic
facts of the subject and avoid those which embroider upon them.
It can happen, if you do False Data Stripping well and expertly without
enforcing your own data on the person, that he can find a whole textbook
false-much to his amazement. In such a case, locate a more fundamental text
on the subject. (Examples of false texts: Eastman Kodak; Lord Keynes
treatises on economics; John Dewey's texts on education; Sigmund Freud's
texts on the mind; the texts derived from the "work" of Wundt (Leipzig 1879-
Father of Modern Psychology); and (joke) a textbook on "Proper Conduct for
Sheep" written by A. Wolf.)
USE OF FALSE DATA STRIPPING
False Data Stripping should be used extensively in all hatting and
training activities. Current society is riddled with false data and these
must be cleared away so that we can hat and train people. Then they will be
able to learn useful data which will enable them to understand things and
produce valuable products in life.
False Data Stripping can be done on or off the meter. It can be done by
an auditor in session, by a Supervisor, Cramming Officer or Word Clearer or
by an exec, Esto or any administrator. Students and staff can be trained to
do it on each other.
Not a lot of training is required to deliver this procedure but anyone
administering it must have checked out on this HCOB/PL and have demoed and
drilled the procedure. If it is going to be done on the meter (which is
preferable) the person doing it must have an OK to operate an E-Meter.
GRADIENTS
It will be found that false data actually comes off in gradients.
For example, a student handled initially on false data on a particular
drill will appear to be complete on it. He goes on with his studies and
makes progress for a while and then sometimes he will hit a bog or slow in
his progress. This is usually an indication that more false data has been
flushed up (restimulated or remembered as a result of actually doing
studies or drills). At that point more basic false data will come off when
asked for. The reason for this is: when you first give a student false data
handling he doesn't know enough about the subject to know false data from
the true. When he has learned a bit more about the subject he then collides
with more false data hitherto buried. This can happen several times, as he
is getting more and more expert on the subject.
Thus the action of stripping off false data can and must be checked for
and used in any training and hatting.
The rundown has to be given again and again at later and later periods,
as a student or staff member may come up against additional faulty data
that has been not-ised. It can be repeated as often as necessary in any
specific area of training until the person is finally duplicating and is
able to use the correct tech and only the correct tech exactly.
THEORY
There is a philosophic background as to why getting off false data on a
subject works and why trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum on
the subject does not work. It is based on the Socratic thesis-antithesis-
synthesis philosophical equation.
Socrates: 470 B.C. - 399 B.C. A great Greek philosopher.
A thesis is a statement or assertion.
Antithesis: opposing statement or assertion.
The Socratic equation is mainly used in debate where one debater
asserts one thing and the other debater asserts the opposite. It was the
contention of Socrates and others that when two forces came into collision
a new idea was born. This was the use of the equation in logic and debate.
However, had they looked further they would have seen that other effects
were brought into play. It has very disastrous effects when it appears in
the field of training.
Where the person has acquired a false thesis (or datum), the true datum
you are trying to teach him becomes an antithesis. The true datum comes
smack up against the false datum he is hanging on to, as it is counter to
it.
In other words, these two things collide, and neither one will then
make sense to him. At this point he can try to make sense out of the
collision and form what is called a synthesis, or his wits simply don't
function. (Synthesis: a unified whole in which opposites, thesis and
antithesis, are reconciled.)
So you wind up with the person either:
(a) attempting to use a false, unworkable synthesis he has formed,
or
(b) his thinkingness locks up on the subject.
In either case you get an impossible-to-train, impossible-to-hat scene.
GLIBNESS
Probably we have here the basic anatomy of the "glib student" who can
parrot off whole chapters on an examination paper and yet in practice uses
his tools as a door stop. This student has been a mystery to the world of
education for eons. What he has probably done in order to get by, is set up
a circuit which is purely memory.
The truth of it is his understanding or participation is barred off by
considerations such as "nothing works anyway but one has to please the
professor somehow."
The less a person can confront, the more false data he has accumulated and
will accumulate. These syntheses are simply additives and complexities and
make the person complicate the subject beyond belief. Or the collision of
false data and true data, without the person knowing which is which, makes
him look like a meathead.
Therefore, in order to cure him of his additives, complexities, apathy
and apparent stupidity on a subject, in addition to cleaning up
misunderstood words, it is necessary to strip the false data off the
subject. Most of the time this is prior to the true data and so is basic on
the chain. Where this is the case, when that basic false data is located
and stripped the whole subject clears up more easily.
FALSE DATA PRONE
Some people are prone to accepting false data. This stems from overts
committed prior to the false data being accepted. The false data then acts
as a justifier for the overt.
An example of this would be a student studying past Mis-Us on a
subject, cheating in the exam and eventually dropping the subject entirely.
Then someone comes along and tells him that the subject is useless and
destructive. Well, he will immediately grab hold of this datum and believe
it as he needs something to justify his earlier overts.
This actually gets into service facsimiles as the person will use the
false data to make the subject or other people wrong.
So if you see someone who is very prone to accepting false data on a
particular subject or in general, the answer is to get the prior overts
pulled. Then the person will not need to justify his overts by accepting
any false data that comes his way.
PROCEDURE
You may not easily be able to detect a false datum because the person
believes it to be true. When False Data Stripping is done on a meter the
false datum won't necessarily read for the same reason.
You therefore ask the person if there is anything he has run across on
the subject under discussion which he couldn't think with, which didn't
seem to add up or seems to be in conflict with the material one is trying
to each him.
The false datum buries itself and the procedure itself handles this
phenomenon.
When the false datum is located it is handled with elementary recall
based on 1950 Straightwire. Straight memory technique or Straightwire (so
called because one is stringing a line between present time and some
incident in the past, and stringing that line directly and without any
detours) was developed originally in 1950 as a lighter process than engram
running. Cleverly used, Straightwire removed locks and released illnesses
without the pc ever having run an engram.
Once one had determined whatever it was that was going to be run with
Straightwire, one would have the pc recall where and when it happened, who
was involved, what were they doing, what was the pc doing, etc. until the
lock blew or the illness keyed out.
Straightwire works at a lock level. When overdone it can key in
underlying engrams. When properly done it can be quite miraculous.
STEPS
A. Determine whether or not the person needs this procedure by checking
the following:
1. The person cannot be hatted on a subject.
2. No Crashing Mis-Us can be found on a subject yet it is obvious
they exist.
3. The person is not duplicating the material he has studied
as he is incorrectly applying it or only applying part of it,
despite Word Clearing.
4. He is rejecting the material he is reading or the definition of
the word he is clearing.
5. You suspect or the person originates earlier data he has
encountered on the materials that could contain false data.
6. The person talks about or quotes other sources or obviously
incorrect sources.
7. He is glib.
8. The person is backing off from actually applying the data he is
studying despite standard Word Clearing.
9. He is bogged.
10. He cannot think with the data and it does not seem to apply.
B. Establish the difficulty the person is having-i.e. what are the
materials he can't duplicate or apply? These materials must be to hand and
the person must be familiar with the basic true data on the subject being
addressed.
C. If the action is being done metered, put the person on the meter and
properly adjust the sensitivity with a proper can squeeze.
D. Thoroughly clear the concept of false data with the person. Have him
give you examples to show he gets it. (This would be done if the person was
receiving False Data Stripping for the first time.)
E. The following questions are used to detect and uncover the false
data. These questions are cleared before they are used for the first time
on anyone. They do not have to read on a meter and may not do so as the
person will not necessarily read on something that he believes to be true.
1. "Is there anything you have run across in (subject under
discussion) which you couldn't think with?"
2. "Is there anything you have encountered in (subject under
discussion) which didn't seem to add up?"
3. "Is there something you have come across in (subject under
discussion) that seems to be in conflict with the material you are
trying to learn?"
4. "Is there something in (subject under discussion) which never
made any sense to you?"
5. "Did you come across any data in (subject under discussion)
that you had no use for?"
6. "Was there any data you came across in (subject under
discussion) that never seemed to fit in?"
7. "Do you know of any datum that makes it unnecessary for you to
do a good job on this subject?"
8. "Do you know of any reason why an overt product is alright?"
9. "Would you be made wrong if you really learned this subject?"
10. "Did anyone ever explain this subject to you verbally?"
11. "Do you know of any datum that conflicts with standard
texts on this subject?"
12. "Do you consider you really know best about this subject?"
13. "Would it make somebody else wrong not to learn this subject?"
14. "Is this subject not worth learning?"
The questions are asked in the above sequence. When an area of false
data is uncovered by one of these questions one goes straight on to Step F-
handling.
F. When the person comes up with an answer to one of the above questions
locate the false datum as follows:
1. Ask: "Have you been given any false data regarding this?" and
help him locate the false datum. If this is being done on the
meter, one can use any meter reads one does get to steer the
person. This may require a bit of work as the person may believe
the false data he has to be true. Keep at it until you get the
false datum.
If the person has given you the false datum in Step E then this step
will not be needed: just go straight on to Step G.
G. When the false datum has been located, handle as follows:
1. Ask: "Where did this datum come from?" (This could be a person.
a book. TV, etc.)
2. "When was this?"
3. "Where exactly were you at the time?"
4. "Where was (the person, book, etc.) at the time?"
5. "What were you doing at the time?"
6. If the false datum came from a person ask: "what was (the
person) doing at the time?"
7. "How did (the person, book, etc.) look at the time?"
8. If the datum has not blown with the above questions ask: "Is
there an earlier similar false datum or incident on (the subject
under discussion)?" and handle per Steps 1-7.
Continue as above until the false datum has blown. On the meter you
will have a floating needle and very good indicators.
DO NOT CONTINUE PAST A POINT WHERE THE FALSE DATUM HAS BLOWN.
If you suspect the datum may have blown but the person has not
originated then ask: "How does that datum seem to you now?" and either
continue if it hasn't blown or end off on that datum if it has blown.
H. When you have handled a particular false datum to a blow, going
earlier similar as necessary, you would then go back and repeat the
question from E (the detection step) that uncovered the false datum. If
there are any more answers to the question, they are handled exactly as in
Step F (location) and Step G (handling). That particular question is left
when the person has no more answers. Then, if the person is not totally
handled on the subject under discussion, one would use the other
questions from Step E and handle them in the same way. All the questions
can be asked and handled as above but one would not continue past a point
where the whole subject has been cleared up and the person can now
duplicate and apply the data he has been having trouble with.
I. CONDITIONAL: If False Data Stripping is being done in conjunction
with Crashing Mis-U finding one would now proceed with the Crashing Mis-U
finding.
J. Send the person to the Examiner.
K. Have the person study or restudy the true data on the subject you
have been handling.
END PHENOMENA
When the above procedure is done correctly and fully on an area the
person is actually having difficulty with he will end up able to duplicate,
understand and apply and think with the data that he could not previously
grasp. The false data that was standing in the road of duplication will
have been cleared away and the person's thinking will have been freed up.
When this occurs, no matter where in the procedure, one ends off the False
Data Stripping on that subject and sends the person to the Examiner. He
will have cognitions and VGIs and on the meter you will have an F/N. This
is not the end of all False Data Stripping for that person. It is the end
of that False Data Stripping on the person at that particular time. As the
person continues to work with and study the subject in question, he will
learn more about it and may again collide with false data at which time one
repeats the above process.
NOTE
False data buries itself as the person may firmly believe that it is
true. Sometimes the person will have such faith in a particular person,
book, etc. that he cannot conceive that any data from that particular
source might be false. One artist being false data stripped had received
some false data from a very famous painter. Even though the data didn't
really add up and actually caused the artist tremendous problems, he tended
to believe it because of where it came from. It took persistence on the
part of the person administering the False Data Stripping to eventually
blow this false datum with a resulting freeing up of the artist's ability
to think and produce in the area.
MISUNDERSTOODS
Misunderstoods often come up during False Data Stripping and should be
cleared when they do. One would then continue with the False Data
Stripping. One person being false data stripped knew he had some false data
from a particular source but the false data was a complete blank-he
couldn't remember it at all. It was discovered that he had a Mis-U just
before he received the false data and as soon as this was cleared up he
recalled the false data and it blew.
This is just one example of how Word Clearing can tie in with False
Data Stripping.
REPEATED USE
False Data Stripping can be done over and over as it will come off in
layers as mentioned before. If False Data Stripping has been done on a
specific thing and at some later point the person is having difficulty with
a drill or the materials, the stripping of false data should be done on him
again.
In such a case it will be seen that the person recognizes or remembers
more false or contrary data he has accumulated on the subject that was not
in view earlier.
As he duplicates a drill or his materials more and more exactly, former
"interpretations" he had not-ised, incorrect past flunks that acted as
invalidation or evaluation, etc., may crop up to be stripped off.
CAUTIONS
CODE. False Data Stripping is done under the discipline of the
Auditor's Code. Evaluation and invalidation can be particularly harmful and
must be avoided. All points of the code apply.
RUDIMENTS. One would not begin False Data Stripping on someone who
already has out-ruds. If the person is upset or worried about something or
is critical or nattery, then you should fly his ruds or get them flown
before you start False Data Stripping.
OVERRUN. One must be particularly careful not to overrun the person
past a blow of the false datum. The stress in recall is that it is a light
action which does not get the person into engrams or heavy charge. Keep it
light. If you overrun someone past the point of a blow, he may drop into
engrams or heavy charge. Just take the recall step to a blow and don't push
him beyond it.
DATE/LOCATE. Date/Locate is another way of getting something to blow.
If a false datum does not blow on the recall steps despite going earlier
similar, then it could be handled with Date/Locate in session as ordered by
the C/S. This would normally be done as part of a False Data Stripping
Repair List. Date/Locating false data would never be done except in session
as ordered by the C/S or as directed by the False Data Stripping Repair
List. The auditor must be totally starrated on Date and Locating and
practiced in it before he attempts it.
FALSE DATA STRIPPING REPAIR LIST. The False Data Stripping Repair List
is used in session by an auditor when False Data Stripping bogs
inextricably or the person is not F/N GIs at exams or gets in trouble after
False Data Stripping has been done. A bogged False Data Stripping session
must be handled within 24 hours.
NEW STUDENTS. Students who are new to Scientology should not use this
procedure on each other as they may be insufficiently experienced to
deliver it competently. In this case the Supervisor or someone qualified
would administer False Data Stripping to those students who need it.
SUMMARY
The problem of the person who is unable to learn or who is unable to
apply what he learns has never been fully resolved before. Misunderstoods
were and are a major factor and Word Clearing must be used liberally. Now,
however, I have made a major breakthrough which finally explains and
handles the problem of inability to learn and apply.
Man's texts and education systems are strewn with false data. These
false data effectively block someone's understanding of the true data. The
handling given in this HCOB/PL makes it possible to remove that block and
enable people to learn data so they can apply it.
With the ability to learn comes stability and the production of
valuable products. With stability and the production of valuable products
comes the achievement of one's purposes and goals, high morale and
happiness.
So let's get to work on stripping away the false data which plagues
Man, clogs up his ability to think and learn and reduces his competence and
effectiveness. Let's increase the ability of individuals and the human
race.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 19 AUGUST 1979
Remimeo
Exec Hats (Also issued as an HCO PL of
Tech & Qual same date same title.)
HAS Hat
Dir I&R
LRH Comm Hats
HIGH CRIME-ADDITION
HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS AND WORD CLEARING
Ref: HCOB 24 Oct 76R C/S Series 96R
(Modified by this HCOB/PL)
HCOB 30 Jan 73RB Word Clearing Series 46RB
METHOD 9 WORD CLEARING THE
RIGHT WAY
HCOB/PL 26 Mar 79R Esto Series 35R
Rev. 25.5.79 Word Clearing Series 60R
MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND
CYCLES OF ACTION
HCOB 16 Jul 79 Product Debug Series 5
Word Clearing Series 63
THE "ELUSIVE" MIS-U
OR CRASHING MIS-U
HCO PL 8 Mar 66 HIGH CRIME
HCO PL 4 Apr 72R III ETHICS AND STUDY TECH
For many years the top auditors, Case Supervisors and Supervisors have
used Word Clearing in their High Crime checkouts, but until now there has
not been an issue that makes this a mandatory action.
From now on, High Crime checkouts require Word Clearing in addition to
starrates. The miracle results of Word Clearing make all the difference in
the world to the quality of technical delivery.
CONSEQUENCES OF NO WORD CLEARING
Lack of Word Clearing has recently brought about some false declares
and a return of Quickie Grades.
In many orgs it was found that new HCOBs were not being word cleared AT
ALL.
The right thing to do is make full use of Word Clearing technology.
WORD CLEARING REQUIREMENTS
From the date of this issue the Qualifications Division, when giving
High Crime checkouts, must require at least Method 9 Word Clearing on the
materials in addition to starrates and drills. Qual should employ other
methods of Word Clearing such as Methods 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 when deemed
necessary to ensure full understanding of the materials being High Crimed.
Methods 2, 4 and 5 are very effective in the hands of a Word Clearer who is
expert in reading an E-Meter. Method 9 is stressed here and made mandatory
because it can be applied easily and is probably the top key method of Word
Clearing today.
Where False Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W handling and service
facsimile tech are available and in use these must be employed where needed
in checkouts.
The point is that Qual must make full use of Word Clearing in all High
Crime checkouts and the student, interne or staff member must be word
cleared to where he honestly has no misunderstood words on the materials.
FORMER HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS
Where High Crime checkouts have been done previously and attested they
remain valid. But, if the auditor, Case Supervisor or Word Clearer is later
crammed on those materials the cramming must include full Method 9 Word
Clearing of the materials on which he goofed and other Word Clearing as
decided by Qual.
TECHNICAL RESULTS
The technology works when it is applied exactly.
Exact application depends on complete understanding.
Complete understanding depends on freedom from misunderstood words.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Assisted by
Commodore's Staff
Captain
LRH:PS:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 AUGUST 1979
Remimeo
All Courses
Ds of T
Supervisors
STOs
Cramming Offs
Tech Div
Qual Div
TWINNING
(CANCELS: BTB 16 Mar 71
STUDENT AND COURSE MORALE,
TOUGH CHECKOUTS & COACHING)
Cancellation of Issues Canceling Twinning
The following BPLs and HCO PLs which canceled issues on twinning, or
canceled or suspended twinning itself, are now CANCELED:
1. HCO PL 29 Jul 72 II FAST FLOW IN TRAINING written by Training and
Services Aide. Though the issues it canceled remain canceled, this HCO
PL itself was canceled by BPL 10 Oct 75 X CANCELLATION OF POLICY
LETTERS 1972 and remains so.
2. HCO PL 31 Aug 74 FAST FLOW TRAINING REINSTATED which suspended twin
training or checkouts, was previously canceled and remains so.
3. BPL 18 Oct 76RD, Rev. 10.9.78 URGENT, IMPORTANT, SUCCESSFUL TRAINING
LINEUP, which canceled requirements of twin training or checkouts for
Academy, has been canceled and replaced by HCO PL 25 Sep 79 I URGENT,
IMPORTANT, SUCCESSFUL TRAINING LINEUP.
THERE ARE NO VALID BPLs OR HCO PLs NOW EXISTING WHICH CANCEL TWINNING.
___________
"Twinning" is the pairing up of two students training on the same
subject to work together on their materials.
It is a Scientology innovation in training. For years it was used
highly successfully when done correctly and as a standard action on
Scientology courses.
Recently I discovered a big WHY behind course failures. That is that
twinning as a subject and practice has become confused and fallen into
misuse or fallen out completely and one of the reasons behind that is that
a number of HCOBs on twinning were canceled and no one issue exists that
covers the subject in its entirety.
THIS HCOB REINSTATES TWINNING FIRMLY AND WITH EMPHASIS.
It is NOT subject to cancellation.
It fully lays out the purpose of twinning, the basics and rules and
correct use of twinning, when and how it is done, the responsibility of
twins and the responsibility of the Supervisor and the handling of twinning
bugs.
It re-establishes mandatory twinning on all practical courses, such as
the TRs
Course, or on the practical sections of a course, such as E-Meter Drills.
It also covers twinning in some areas of theory study where it is obviously
called for, such as Method 9 Word Clearing when done between students.
BACKGROUND
In 1954 we found that when you teamed up students of comparable case
level and ability they then made progress. When we find something that is
that workable we put it to use. Twinning was installed as a fundamental
part of the Scientology system of training and it immediately and
effectively brought up the participation and action levels of entire course
rooms of students. Students grasped the application of the materials
faster. It gave us results.
Originally twinning was used almost exclusively on practical drills.
Later, in the early '60s, it was carried over into twin checkouts on
theory. Still later, with the advent of Word Clearing, applied study tech
and fast flow, twinning as a broad mandatory action for all students on
theory was canceled.
Even so, some orgs continued twinning students unnecessarily on admin
courses and some theory courses and were not enforcing twinning on courses
where it is mandatory, such as a TRs Course.
Twinning on practical courses and practical actions has never been
canceled by me and was never intended to be canceled. However, a line in a
BPL (BPL 18 Oct 76RD Rev. 10.9.78 URGENT, IMPORTANT, SUCCESSFUL TRAINING
LINEUP) which stated: "Requirements of twin training or checkouts for
Academy are canceled" caused twinning to be dropped out even on practical
drills in some areas and threw a confusion into the scene in other areas.
The above BPL has now been canceled with a vengeance and is replaced by HCO
PL 25 Sept 79 I URGENT, IMPORTANT, SUCCESSFUL TRAINING LINEUP.
And this bulletin restores twinning to its rightful place in training
as the vital tool that it is.
WHY TWINNING?
One reason twinning is so vital is that it brings those people who have
sunk back into their First Dynamic up out of their First Dynamic and onto
the Third. It gives the student a terminal to work with. It puts students
into communication, into doingness and participation. One doesn't learn by
being a spectator. Twinning not only gets students extroverted but also
gets them to take some responsibility for their fellow man. These are
factors that are sadly lacking in modern permissive education.
TWINNING VERSUS MODERN PERMISSIVENESS
With twinning we are cutting right across modern "permissive" teaching.
The modern tendency is to just let everybody do as they please and put
their attention on whatever they please. This is the "think" of the day,
and it is in in most basic school systems and has spread as well into many
different fields.
Probably someone somewhere thought it would be much quicker and easier
and require much less confront to just let a student sit there
permissively, with his attention wandering around in the total significance
of it all and then claim he had passed the subject when he had never gone
near it.
It is a symptom of people who can't confront not to make anyone else
confront.
We don't buy this. It is totally batty. The creeping disease of
permissiveness, non confront and spectatorism is simply a part of "the
beautiful world of irresponsible slop." It has no place in Scientology
training.
Real twinning, enforced, effectively pulls the student right up out of the
vague permissiveness of modern think and lands him with some responsibility
right from the start. With that he can be honestly trained.
CAUSE AND EFFECT
A person being trained is mainly working on an inflow basis. Day after
day it is inflow, inflow, inflow. This tends to put him at effect.
In twinning, the person can balance his inflow with outflow. This keeps
him from going totally into effect. It puts some cause into the scene.
A person, when he is expected to apply knowledge or skills, must, of
course, be at cause. When he is trained totally at effect, he can get into
what is called a "stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he can't outflow the
subject. Yet, if he is ever going to apply it, he is going to have to
outflow it.
Twinning has the virtue of balancing inflow and outflow. It will be
found that when the person comes to apply the tech, he is already able to
outflow if he was trained using twinning.
WHEN TO TWIN
It is not necessary to twin students on admin courses, nor, as a
general rule, on tech theory courses. You ensure the student is applying
study tech and is not going past misunderstood words and you let him get on
with it.
Practical and practical courses are another matter.
Mandatory Twinning
Twinning is mandatory on those courses where the essence of the course
is to train the student in the practical application of the data. This
would include the TRs Course, any Upper Indoc and Objectives Course, a
specialized E-Meter Drills Course and courses of a similar nature.
Even though such courses also include theory, the final objective of
such a course is a person trained and drilled in the doingness involved and
twinning is absolutely essential for this purpose.
Thus, on such a course, twins are assigned at the beginning of the
course and they remain assigned through to the completion of that course.
We call it "assigning twins in concrete." One does not musical chair twins,
once assigned, nor allow them to drift from one twin to another.
The whole essence of twinning is to get two students to work together,
to assist each other and take responsibility for getting each other
successfully through the course.
Twinning On Practical Sections Of Courses
On certain courses containing both theory and practical, such as
Academy Levels, you would not necessarily twin students on the theory
section of the course. You would, however, definitely and mandatorily twin
them on the practical sections.
For example, twinning is a must on E-Meter Drills, or such actions as
assessment drilling, drilling of special rundown procedures where this is
called for, Learning Drills, Obnosis Drills and other practical
applications.
Twinning On Word Clearing
One always twins students where Method 9 Word Clearing is to be done
between the students themselves and not by a Word Clearer.
Similarly, Method 8 Word Clearing is twinned, on exactly the same turn-
about basis as described in Method 9. (Ref: HCOB 30 Jan 73RB Rev. 1.6.79
Word Clearing Series 46RB METHOD 9 WORD CLEARING THE RIGHT WAY)
An example of turn-about on Method 8 would be: First twin clears word
"a." Second twin then clears word "a" AND word "b." First twin then clears
word "b" AND word "c," etc. You do two actions consecutively every time.
Twins may also be assigned to get each other through other methods of
Word Clearing in this way.
Henceforth, on courses such as the Primary Rundown, where Word Clearing
is the essence of the course, twinning is mandatory.
Wherever twins are assigned, whether for an entire course or for
practical sections of a course, the rules of twinning apply.
ASSIGNING TWINS
The Supervisor is responsible for assigning twins.
He should take care to team up students of comparable case level and
training and abilities inasmuch as possible. In this way both twins make
the best progress. Twinning a very fast student with a slow student should
be avoided, if possible, as it can be frustrating and upsetting to both
students. This must never be used as an excuse NOT to twin students.
However, ideally, one matches them up according to their capabilities and
twinning goes smoothly and produces best results when this is done.
In some rare instances it may be necessary to reassign twins who have
been incorrectly paired. But it should not be necessary if care was taken
in teaming them up correctly to begin with.
Otherwise, once assigned, twins work together through to successful
completion of the course or activity.
TURN-ABOUT
THE RULE OF TWINNING IS THAT IT IS DONE ON A "TURN-ABOUT" BASIS.
"Turn-about" is done as follows:
One student coaches his twin through a drill or a section of a drill.
They then turn-about and the second twin does the same drill or section of
that drill PLUS the next drill or next section of the drill. They then turn-
about again, with the first student doing the drill his twin has just done
PLUS the one following.
The same system applies in Method 9 or Method 8 Word Clearing. One twin
clears a word or M9s a paragraph or section of the text. They turn-about
and the second twin clears the word or M9s the paragraph or section PLUS
the following one. They turn-about again, with the first twin now clearing
or M9ing the word or section his twin just cleared PLUS the one following.
Turn-about is applied as well to starrate checkouts where these are
called for. It may be done by checking out an entire bulletin on one's twin
before the turn-about is done. Or, where a very long text is to be
starrated, the turn-about can be done after each section.
With the turn-about system one person is not constantly leading and
misunderstoods are kept picked up between twins. The twins keep apace with
each other, we don't get unbalanced flows and both are kept progressing.
THE TWIN'S RESPONSIBILITY
A TWIN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SEEING THAT THE STUDENT WITH WHOM HE IS
TWINNED KNOWS AND CAN APPLY THE MATERIAL HE HAS STUDIED .
Twins must be made aware of this responsibility at the onset of the
course.
The twin word clears his fellow student. He listens to his sentences
and sees that they are correct and fit the definition of the word being
cleared. He makes sure his twin understands the materials. If the student
doesn't know them cold, the twin helps the student find his misunderstood
words and gets him through any difficulties.
Twins do practical drills together. They coach each other to wins and
certainty in applying the materials 100% correctly.
If a student flunks a Supervisor checkout on materials he's been passed
on by his twin, both students get a flunk. The twin must have a
misunderstood himself if he missed the other student's goof.
Morale and Production
MORALE depends on production.
PRODUCTION, in training, is the evidence of the demonstration of
competence.
MORALE IS UP WHEN COMPETENCE IS DEMONSTRATED.
MORALE IS UP WHEN PRODUCTION IS UP.
Morale isn't necessarily built by being "nice." Twinning actions are
carried out with good ARC, but being "nice" is not enough.
A student getting a good stiff coaching session from his twin and
passing-or getting a good, stiff checkout and passing, feels great. He has
really accomplished something. He knows that he knows the data or drill.
A student who gets poor or nonstandard coaching or checkouts feels and
knows that he has been cheated. If his twin is just being "nice" he doesn't
win and doesn't appreciate the checkout. His morale will be down.
One keeps his twin's morale and production high. One gives him tough
standard coaching sessions so he becomes competent. One gives him tough
standard checkouts so he KNOWS HE HAS DEMONSTRATED HIS COMPETENCE IN THE
MATERIALS. It is always done with good ARC.
It must be real to student and Supervisor alike that twinning is not a
namby-pamby, brush-off activity.
One is responsible for getting his twin through the course. If one twin
goes to Review, the other goes to Review. If one twin goes to Ethics, the
other goes to Ethics. If one twin should blow, the other twin must go and
get him. One is responsible for getting his twin through the course.
There have been cases in the past where one twin worked like mad to get
the other twin through an extensive section right at the end of the course.
The other twin then
simply went off and would not do the same so the first student could also
finish the course.
IT IS NOW FIRM POLICY THAT WHERE SUCH AN INSTANCE OCCURS, THE STUDENT
WHO ABANDONED HIS TWIN JUST BECAUSE HE HIMSELF WAS FINISHED MAY NOT BE
CERTIFIED
AND MAY NOT BE GIVEN A COURSE COMPLETION UNTIL HE HAS
COMPLETED HIS TWIN.
Twins are responsible for getting each other through the course.
THE SUPERVISOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
It is the Supervisor's responsibility to enforce twinning per the
points in this bulletin.
He assigns twins, pairing them according to their capabilities.
He ensures twinning is being done by the book, on a turn-about basis,
with both twins making progress.
He makes sure twins are wearing their hats as twins and taking
responsibility for getting each other through, exactly as laid out in
course materials.
A "double flunk" is given when a student flunks a Supervisor checkout
on materials his twin has passed him on. "Double flunk" means the student
and his twin are both flunked in such a case, as, if the twin has missed
the student's goof, he must have misunderstoods of his own.
The Supervisor maintains high tech standards by adhering firmly to this
system and when he must double flunk he makes sure both twins get handled
on the goof.
A situation can occur where a student and his twin get into a "games
condition," one with the other. This gives a no-progress, problem
situation. The students who are twinned are not both working toward the
same goal but one is in opposition to the other in some way. This gives no
progress, no wins, no production, no demonstration of competence being
permitted and low morale.
It is the responsibility of the Supervisor as well as the twinned
students to not permit such a situation to occur. With any failure of a
twin to be a twin and assume that responsibility, the Supervisor gets the
student checked out on this bulletin and any other applicable course
material and ensures the student is fully handled.
To keep the course morale high, Supervisors must insist on production
and on the demonstration of competence on all materials by the student and
his twin.
In a case where a student gets sent to Review or Ethics, the Supervisor
must uphold the rule that his twin always gets sent as well. He ensures
that any blown student is recovered by his twin. In all such cases the
Supervisor keeps track of his students and ensures they're handled and
gotten back on course rapidly.
A Supervisor who understands the WHY of twinning and sees it is carried
out standardly is going to produce causative, responsible graduates who can
apply what they have learned.
EMPHASIS ON NO VERBAL DATA
All students should be made aware, from the beginning of training, that
the answers to their questions are in their course materials or other
source references.
The issues on verbal tech, HCOB 9 Feb 79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH and HCOB
15 Feb 79 VERBAL TECH PENALTIES, should be well-known in the course room.
Even so, students, particularly when they are new, sometimes get into
an exchange of verbal data or opinion while they are twinning. A Supervisor
must be on the alert for this and step in to handle at once when he
observes it happening. He uses study tech to straighten the scene out and
always refers the students to the above mentioned HCOBs on verbal tech.
Twinned students, of course, bear a responsibility for not spreading
verbal tech, neither between themselves nor to anyone else, for that
matter. A twin always refers his fellow student to source materials.
HANDLING BUGS ON TWINNING
The main twinning bugs which could arise are those which were
encountered earlier on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course. One twin
would get sent to Ethics or Cramming or Review and the other one then had
no twin. Thus, twinning could get to be a little bit unpopular and could
block somebody from finishing the course unless these factors are handled.
The remedy for this sort of thing is to send both twins to Ethics, both
twins to Cramming, both twins to Review and if anybody blows, send his twin
after him. In other words, we don't buy the idea that everybody is totally
irresponsible for everybody else in this wonderful First Dynamic world.
This is not a mere expediency. It takes only a good, straight look at the
purpose and WHY of twinning to recognize the value of this system. Those
who do recognize its value will enforce and maintain it.
There is another situation which could act as a bug in twinning. What
happens when one twin actually does disappear from the scene totally, in
spite of checkouts and crammings and ethics? What do you do with the
remaining twin? Unhandled, it can stop a course for a student, so handled
it must be and with no time wasted. You don't let the odd twin rattle
around on his own for very long.
If he's not too far advanced into the course he can be twinned with an
oncoming student. (A well-run course room will always have new students
enrolling.) Every effort is then made to get the newcomer caught up with
his twin as rapidly as possible.
But what of the more advanced student who loses a twin? If there's
absolutely no other single terminal to team him up with, there is still a
solution far preferable to having him continue on his own. You match him up
with a set of twins of comparable ability and advancement to his and you
turn that twinship into a trio. Once formed, you run that trio as tightly
as you would any twinship. The turn-about system would then need to be
adjusted to a "round robin." (Example: A coaches B. B coaches C, C coaches
A.) And it would then reverse. This is more easily seen if it is
diagrammed:
A coaches B on the 1st
action (drill, definition,
etc. ) B
B coaches C on the 1st
action C
C coaches A on the 1st
action A
And then it reverses.
B C coaches B on the
2nd action
A B coaches A on the
2nd action
C A coaches C on the
2nd action
And now it reverses back.
A coaches B on the 3rd
action B
B coaches C on the 3rd
action C
C coaches A on the 3rd
action A
And now it would reverse back again (C coaches B. etc.) and so on
through the drill, definition or M9 section.
All the rules of twinning then apply to these three. You "assign the
trio in concrete" and you ensure they keep advancing. Again, the point here
is that we operate on the Third Dynamic where one does take some
responsibility for his fellow man.
HANDLING BOGGED STUDENTS AND THEIR TWINS
When a bogged student cannot be handled in the course room with
standard Word Clearing and study tech and he is sent to Cramming, Review
or, where indicated, to Ethics, his twin is also always sent.
The idea is not only to keep the twins together and taking
responsibility for each other but to also correct and repair both of them
as needed.
In other words, one twin doesn't simply sit there and observe the other
twin being handled. The twin of a bogged student will also require handling
in Review, Ethics, or Cramming himself. If a student has ended up on Review
lines, it must be assumed that the twin has goofed as a twin and has
misunderstoods on the course materials. This must be sorted out and
resolved by the Dir Review when the twins route through Review.
The Dir Review determines, by interview, what the trouble is and how it
should be resolved. This is done on an individual basis for each twin.
For example, the bogged student may need Word Clearing or a Word
Clearing Correction List and his twin may need to restudy this twinning
bulletin or other course materials.
In Ethics, for example, a student may be involved in some sort of out-
ethics situation, such as continually being late for course. In any ethics
situation one would look for the possibility of mutual rudiments between
twins. Whether or not mutual ruds exist, the twin would always be given
some handling in regard to his responsibility in the situation.
In the above example, the Ethics Officer might handle the student with
an amends project. He would then go over with the twin the matter of his
responsibility and what steps he could take to ensure the student gets to
course on time. The twin would then get the student through his amends, get
through his own handling, whatever its nature and the two of them would
then go back to course.
The twin sees the student through his review, cramming or ethics cycle and,
whenever possible, is used to help the student get through it. He also
receives appropriate handling himself.
THE RULE IS: WHEN ONE STUDENT BECOMES BOGGED, HIS TWIN IS ALWAYS SENT
WITH HIM TO CRAMMING, REVIEW OR ETHICS.
In the rare case where a student is going to require extensive handling
in Review or Ethics, such as case handling or suspension from course where
such would be truly warranted, the Dir Review or Ethics Officer may send
the other twin back to course to be retwinned with another student.
The Supervisor always checks up on any students who have been routed
off course temporarily. He must keep himself informed as to their
whereabouts and progress on correction lines and see that they are returned
to course corrected, as rapidly as possible. He does not allow any student
or twin to simply drop off his lines with an incomplete course, unhandled
or unaccounted for. Any twin has the responsibility of getting himself and
his fellow student back onto the course as well.
Once students get the idea that their own progress on a course depends
utterly on the quality of their twinning you will start to see some quite
magical results. They're now out of the irresponsibility of it all and
operating on the Third Dynamic.
It simply takes standard supervision plus REAL TWINNING.
That is the winning combination.
So enforce twinning.
It will show up in F/Ning students and high and genuine course
completions, which any Supervisor, any org. any graduate can be proud of.
And I will be proud of you, too.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1979
Remimeo Issue I
Word Clearers
Cram Officers
Supervisors
Estos Word Clearing Series 65
Tech
Qual Product Debug Series 6
CRASHING MUs, BLOCKS TO FINDING THEM
Ref: HCOB 17 Jun 79 CRASHING MlS-Us: THE KEY
TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF
ACTION AND PRODUCTS
HCOB 8 Sep 64 OVERTS. WHAT LIES BEHIND
THEM?
HCOB 7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING
HCOB 7 Jul 64 JUSTIFICATIONS
HCOB 21 Jan 60 JUSTIFICATION
HCOB 5 Sep 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FAC
SIMILE
HCOB 6 Sep 78II SERVICE FACSIMILES AND
ROCK SLAMS
HCOB 6 Sep 78III ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL
SERVICE FACSIMILE HAND
LING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA
DIANETICS
It may occur in Crashing MU finding that no Crashing MU can be found
even though it is obvious from the person's inability to complete a cycle
of action or get out a product that a Crashing MU must exist.
It is vital, in attempting to find someone's Crashing MUs, that one
does not abandon the search simply because, on enquiry, the person is
unable to come up with anything. It may take skill and hard work to uncover
the Crashing MU but it must be found, no matter how arduous the search. The
completion of the cycle of action and the accomplishment of the product
depend on locating and clearing up the Crashing MU that is getting in the
way.
Crashing MUs can be buried. They can be buried by
A) Other MU words
B) Overts or withholds
C) False data
D) Justifications
E) Service facsimiles.
Any one of A, B. C, D or E above or a combination of these can prevent
one from finding the Crashing MU. One handles by
a) Clearing up the other MUs
b) Pulling the overts or withholds
c) Stripping off the false data
d) Getting off the justifications
e) Handling the service facsimile or sending the person to an
auditor to get audited on it.
If the Word Clearer came across the situation where no Crashing MU
could be found despite obvious indications that one existed, he would check
for each of the above blocks in turn and handle anything there was to
handle on each point. After handling one of the above blocks, he would
recheck for the Crashing MU and if still not available to be found and
cleared, he would proceed to check the next block and so on until the
Crashing MU was found and cleared. One would check for the blocks in the
sequence given (A-E) and only go so far as necessary to uncover the
Crashing MU.
CRASHING MUs
The full handling of a Crashing MU itself will be found in:
HCOB 17 Jun 79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF
ACTION AND PRODUCTS
HCOB 18 Jun 79 THE CRASHING MIS-U REPAIR LIST-LC1
HCOB 16 Jul 79 THE "ELUSIVE" MIS-U OR CRASHING MIS-U
HCOB 26 Mar 79RA MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND CYCLES OF ACTION-MU WORDS
AND NO PRODUCTS
HCOB 7 Jul 79 CRASHING MIS-U DEFINITION
A. OTHER MISUNDERSTOODS
Ref: Word Clearing Series
The person may have MUs and confusions which are obscuring the Crashing
MU. In attempting to find the Crashing MU one might have to find and clear
these other MUs before the person can locate the Crashing MU which has been
buried by these other MUs and which is hanging up the cycle of action or
the product.
A Crashing MU is a MU that crashes a subject and crashes a person. It
is straight on the subject-line that is giving trouble and is totally
blocking the person's comprehension of the subject. This is not to be
confused with other MUs. These would include grammatical MUs, MUs on
disrelated subjects or MUs on simple words. A Crashing MU is quite
different. It is directly on the subject and it totally blocks the person's
understanding of the subject and stops any cycles of action or products on
that line.
HANDLING: Other MUs obscuring the Crashing MU are located and cleared
using any of Word Clearing Methods 2-9 or a combination of these. One might
have to do Method 2 and Method 4 on certain materials, for example, before
the Crashing MU can then be located. Method 9 is a very thorough and
fruitful method of word clearing materials. By whatever method, the MUs are
found and cleared. Any MUs that come up during Crashing MU Finding are
immediately cleared. This does not mean, however, that one has found the
Crashing MU. One has simply unburdened it.
B. OVERTS AND WITHHOLDS
Ref: Academy Class II Materials
As covered in HCOB 8 Sep 64 OVERTS, WHAT LIES BEHIND THEM?, overts and
withholds can enter in after the person encounters a misunderstood word or
symbol on the subject or in the area. Having committed the overt, the
person may now be withholding so hard that it can become impossible to get
his attention onto the MU word that comes earlier in time and is more basic
than the withhold.
An example of this would be someone who had broken a machine as a result of
trying to operate it over his MU on how it worked. His attention would
become so caught up with withholding this overt that he might not be able
to confront the area at all, let alone find the underlying Crashing MU.
The person's withholds on the subject of the area not only prevent him
from talking about it sensibly to the person trying to find his Crashing
MUs, but also tend to withhold him from the subject itself. He won't be
able to think well on that subject because he is withholding data
concerning it. The person might also be frightened of punishment or
discipline if he did reveal his overt. Therefore, communication with the
Crashing MU finder or the subject, also may block up his memory or his
ability to think on the subject and so a Crashing MU can be buried totally
out of sight.
HANDLING: The handling of O/Ws would depend on whether or not one was
using a meter for the Crashing MU finding.
In metered Crashing MU finding one would ask:
"Concerning (subject under discussion) is there anything you are
withholding?" and if it was reading one would handle per HCOB 11 Aug 78, I,
RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS AND PATTER. Suppress and False could be used as
needed.
One could also check and handle:
"Concerning (subject under discussion) have you committed any overt?"
"Concerning (subject under discussion) has a withhold been missed?"
In nonmetered Crashing MU finding one could ask the person if he had
any overt or withhold concerning the subject under discussion. Very often,
if one is in good communication with the person and there is no
accusativeness or duress, he will say, "Well, actually, I didn't want to
tell anyone but I lost all the ruddy rods," or whatever the withhold was.
In nonmetered asking for overts or withholds one must get the person meter
checked immediately afterwards to ensure nothing gets missed. It goes
without saying that a person can get very misemotional or blow or get very
angry with the Crashing MU finder if you miss a withhold on him. So don't
be surprised if you get a sudden blow-up when you use unmetered overt or
withhold questions.
C. FALSE DATA
Ref: HCOB/PL 7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING
A person who has been given and has accepted false data or false
definitions on a subject may become convinced that he "knows" the words
when in fact the data and definitions may be entirely false. This may even
prevent the misunderstoods from reading on the meter. It can certainly bury
a Crashing MU because the person's certainty that he "knows" the data will
prevent him from looking for the Crashing MU which is blocking him from
getting products.
HANDLING: One handles false data by stripping it off exactly per HCOB/PL 7
Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING. This is a procedure which locates the false
data and then blows it by recall. It is an extremely effective way of
getting off the false data which is blocking the person's understanding of
a subject by giving him a false understanding.
D. JUSTIFICATIONS
Ref: HCOB 21 Jan 60 JUSTIFICATION
HCOB 7 Jul 64 JUSTIFICATIONS
A person can have a defense mechanism whereby he justifies having a
Crashing MU by giving reasons why it is OK not to understand the subject or
area. He explains
why he doesn't have to understand and makes others wrong for trying to set
him straight on it. Examples of this would be:
"I'm new and haven't been at it too long."
"I have to spend so much time on my post, I don't have time to learn
about it."
"Only a professional could really understand this."
"No one really knows anything about that subject anyway."
"They keep changing the terminology so how could I learn it."
HANDLING: The handling of justifications is covered in HCOB 7 Aug 79 FALSE
DATA STRIPPING which has several questions in the section on locating the
false data which are designed to pull off the person's justifications for
failure to understand a subject or inability to turn out professional
products in an area. Basically the questions ask for anything that makes it
OK not to know a particular subject or not to get results with that
subject. When the justifications are located they are blown with recall,
just as with false data in general.
If there are no justifications present or if the trouble does not
resolve with pulling off justifications, then it will be handled with the
next section-service facsimilies- since justifications as used here are
really a specialized kind of self-serving service facsimile. Justifications
and service facsimiles are actually cousins.
E. SERVICE FACSIMILIES
Ref: Academy Class IV Materials
HCOB 5 Sep 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 6 Sep 78 II SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS
HCOB 6 Sep 78 III ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL SERVICE
FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH
NEW ERA DIANETICS
A service facsimile is an idea someone uses to make himself right and
others wrong. These ideas are held in by engrams. For the purposes of
Crashing MU finding, they can be handled by recall.
If you are trying to find someone's Crashing MU and he has a service
facsimile getting in the way, then his efforts will be taken up entirely
with trying to make himself right and you and others wrong and you will not
be able to get to the Crashing MU. He would even feel made wrong if a
Crashing MU was found.
One person who was being checked for a Crashing MU in an area in which
she was goofing could not even see her goofs, let alone a Crashing MU.
Eventually she admitted that she had the idea that she could not be wrong
regarding this particular subject. When this was spotted and cleared up the
Crashing MU could be located and the whole area straightened out.
HANDLING: If the person is manifesting the symptoms of a service facsimile
or if the failure to find a Crashing MU where one obviously must exist is
not resolved with A-D above, then the Word Clearer would ask, "Is there
some idea you are using which makes you right and others wrong?" and two-
way comm with him about it without getting into listing for an item.
Usually the person will give up the service facsimile and realize that he
has been making himself right and others wrong. He will feel very relieved
to have spotted it and will be able to look for and find his Crashing MU.
If, however, the service facsimile does not come up on request and two-way
comm, then the person should be sent for handling by an auditor on service
facsimiles.
CAUTIONS
The remedies given in this HCOB must be understood to be remedies for
inability to locate the Crashing MU-they are not substitutes for standard
application of the tech of finding and clearing Crashing MUs.
One would always begin with the standard approach to finding the
Crashing MU and, if none was found, only then would one check for and
handle each of the blocks given above in the sequence given.
If one found something on any of A-E above, one would handle it and
then check again for the Crashing MU. One does not automatically check all
of A-E. The sole idea is to handle whatever is burying the Crashing MU and
as soon as that has been achieved one returns to Crashing MU finding.
If half way through the False Data Stripping, for example, the person
realizes he has had a Crashing MU on , then that's it. You wouldn't now
continue the False Data Stripping. You would complete the step you were on
and then end off.
The same goes for any of the remedies. As soon as the Crashing MU is
found or findable, the purpose of the remedy has been achieved and that
would be it.
As it is fatal to miss a withhold on someone, it is very important that
any withhold pulling done is thorough and goes to real VGIs whether it is
metered or unmetered. Withhold pulling off the meter must be followed by a
meter check, whether anything is found or not.
Similarly in asking for a service facsimile it is possible to start the
person listing and if he gets sick or caves in later one must assume that
this has occurred and get the action repaired in session rapidly.
NOTE: Of course if the person is PTS and dramatizing creating problems,
you may not be able to get anywhere at all until he has been run on Clay
Table de-PTSing to full EP.
These cautions are not given here to make it look difficult or
dangerous to do Crashing MU finding. It is usually very straightforward.
However, if one is going to get results every time, he must be aware of the
possible errors or barriers that he may run into and should know how to
handle them.
SUMMARY
Sometimes Crashing MU finding draws a blank even though there is plenty
of evidence that a Crashing MU exists.
Other misunderstoods, overts or withholds, false data, justifications
and service facsimiles can bury the Crashing MU.
If one runs into this situation, one must not abandon the Crashing MU
finding as the person will continue to have difficulty and will not get out
his products.
The answer is to handle the blocks that are preventing the Crashing MU
from being found and then find and clear the Crashing MU.
Then one can get the spectacular results of this miracle tech every
time.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1979
Issue II
Remimeo
Tech
Qual Product Debug Series 10
C/Ses
PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST
Ref: HCO PL 23 Aug 791 Product Debug Series 1,
Esto Series 37
DEBUG TECH
HCO PL 23 Aug 79 II Product Debug Series 2,
Esto Series 38
DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST
Product Debug Series
The purpose of this list is to repair a messed up Product Debug (as
covered in HCO PL 23 Aug 79 I Product Debug Series 1, Esto Series 37 DEBUG
TECH and HCO PL 23 Aug 79 II Product Debug Series 2, Esto Series 38 DEBUG
TECH CHECKLIST).
In the event of somebody getting messed up because of faulty debugging,
use this list to clean up the BPC and then get the person back to complete
the debug actions.
This list is done in session by an auditor and is assessed Method 3.
Preface each line with: "On your Product Debug handling_____."
Each reading line is taken to F/N per the instructions.
Any R/S turned on on this list must be immediately reported to the
Ethics Officer.
Any such assessment sheet as this must be placed in the person's pc
folder.
PC's NAME: DATE:_______________
AUDITOR:
SECTION 1
1A. DID YOU HAVE AN OUT-LIST? ________
(Handle per HCOB 11 Apr 77 LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF, section on "Use
of L4BRA.")
1B. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG ITEM? ________
(Indicate and handle per HCOB 11 Apr 77 LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF and
C/S Series 78.)
1C. WERE YOU GIVEN A WRONG WHY? ________
(Indicate and handle per HCOB 11 Apr 77 LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF and
C/S Series 78.)
1D. WERE YOU BEING DEBUGGED ON THE WRONG PRODUCT? ________
(Indicate and handle per C/S Series 78.)
1E. WAS THE WRONG AREA ADDRESSED? ________
(Indicate and handle per C/S Series 78.)
1F. WERE YOU ASSIGNED A WRONG CONDITION? ________
(Indicate and handle as a wrong item.)
SECTION 2
2A. DID YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? ________
(Fly the ARC break.)
2B. DID YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? ________
(Fly the problem.)
2C. DID YOU HAVE A WITHHOLD? ________
(Pull the withhold.)
2D. DID YOU HAVE AN OVERT? ________
(Pull the overt.)
2E. DID THE PERSON DOING THE DEBUG MISS A WITHHOLD? ________
(Pull the withhold.)
2F. WERE OVERTS OR WITHHOLDS RESTIMULATED BUT NOT BLOWN? ________
(Pull the overts or withholds.)
2G. WAS THERE AN OVERT OR WITHHOLD THAT WAS GOTTEN OFF MORE THAN ONCE?
________
(Indicate it and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
2H. DID SOMEBODY SAY YOU HAD AN OVERT OR WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN'T?
________
(Indicate it and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
2I. WAS THERE SOME OTHER KIND OF OUT-RUD? ________
(Find out what and handle.)
2J. WERE YOU USING THE DEBUG AS AN EXCUSE NOT TO PRODUCE? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
2K. WAS THERE SOME KIND OF OUT-ETHICS? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
2L. DID YOU HAVE COUNTER-INTENTION? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
2M. DID YOU HAVE OTHER-INTENTION? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
2N. WAS THERE ANY INVALIDATION? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
2O. WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
2P. WERE THERE IGNORED ORIGINATIONS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
2Q. WERE YOU PROTESTING? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
2R. DID YOU HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE ACTION? ________
(Find out if it's out-ruds, MUs or past failures and handle.)
2S. WAS THERE A FAILED PURPOSE? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
SECTION 3
3A. DID YOU RESENT THE DEBUG ACTIONS? ________
(Find out why and 2WC E/S to F/N putting in any out-ruds. If the
debug was unnecessary indicate it and take it E/S to F/N.)
3B. WAS THERE NO INSPECTION DONE TO DETERMINE WHAT TO DEBUG?
________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to have the inspection done
and then a proper debug.)
3C. WAS THE INSPECTION MISDONE IN SOME WAY? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to have the inspection done
properly and then a proper debug.
3D. DID YOU FEEL THE PERSON DOING THE DEBUG WAS ACTING OUT OF REVENGE?
________
(Quad ruds and overts on the terminal.)
3E. DID YOU FEEL THE PERSON DOING THE DEBUG WAS JUST TRYING TO GET EVEN
WITH YOU? ________
(Quad ruds and overts on the terminal.)
SECTION 4
4A. DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS BEING DONE? ________
(Handle his MUs and questions.)
4B. WERE THERE WORD CLEARING ERRORS? ________
(Assess and handle a WCCL.)
4C. WAS AN MU FOUND THAT WAS NOT CLEARED? ________
(Fully clear the MU to F/N.)
4D. WAS THE WORD CLEARED NOT REALLY A MISUNDERSTOOD? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
4E. WERE YOU TOLD YOU HAD MUs WHEN YOU DIDN'T? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
4F. WAS YOUR CRASHING MIS-U FINDING MESSED UP? ________
(Assess and handle a Crashing Mis-U Repair List.)
4G. WAS THE CRASHING MIS-U FOUND NOT FULLY CLEARED? ________
(Clear it fully to F/N.)
4H. COULDN'T YOU FIND THE CRASHING MIS-U? ________
(Assess and handle the Crashing Mis-U Repair List.)
4I. WERE YOU TOLD YOU HAD A CRASHING MIS-U WHEN YOU DIDN'T?
________
(Indicate and take E/S to F/N. Do a Crashing Mis-U Repair List if
necessary. )
4J. WAS YOUR CRASHING MIS-U FINDING MISDONE? ________
(Assess and handle a Crashing Mis-U Repair List.)
4K. COULDN'T COMPLETE SOME CYCLE OF ACTION? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send to the Word Clearer for handling with Crashing
Mis-U tech.)
SECTION 5
5A. WAS THERE FALSE DATA? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send to the debugger for False Data Stripping on the
area.)
5B. WAS YOUR FALSE DATA HANDLING MESSED UP? ________
(Assess and handle the False Data Stripping Repair List.)
5C. WAS THE "FALSE DATA" FOUND NOT REALLY FALSE DATA? ________
(Indicate it and have him spot this. Take it E/S to F/N.)
5D. WAS SOME FALSE DATA UNCOVERED BUT NOT BLOWN? ________
(Handle the false data to a blow with the False Data Stripping
procedure.)
5E. DID THE PERSON DOING THE DEBUG GIVE YOU FALSE DATA? ________
(Indicate and strip off the false data per HCOB 7 Aug 79 Product
Debug Series 8, Esto Series 36 FALSE DATA STRIPPING.)
5F. WAS THE TRUE OR CORRECT DATA NEVER FOUND? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to have this handled with
False Data Stripping.)
5G. DID SOMEBODY SAY YOU HAD FALSE DATA WHEN YOU DIDN'T? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
5H. HAD THE FALSE DATA ALREADY BEEN HANDLED? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
5I. WERE YOU GIVEN ANY VERBAL DATA? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program this to be handled with the "How to Defeat
Verbal Tech Checklist.")
5J. ARE YOU OPERATING OFF FALSE OR VERBAL DATA? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program this to be handled with False
Data Stripping and the "How to Defeat Verbal Tech Checklist.")
5K. HAVE YOU GIVEN OTHERS FALSE DATA? ________
(Pull as a withhold. Then strip off any false data he has in the
area.)
5L. HAVE YOU TOLERATED FALSE DATA BEING GIVEN YOU? ________
(Pull as a withhold. Then strip off the false data.)
5M. HAVE YOU CONCLUDED SOMETHING WITHOUT CHECKING IT OUT TO OBTAIN THE
FULL FACTS? ________
(Handle as a withhold. Then strip off any false data he has on the
area. )
5N. HAVE YOU FAILED TO DO YOUR HOMEWORK IN YOUR SUBJECT?
________
(Handle as a withhold. Then strip off any false data he has in the
area. )
5O. HAVE YOU JUST HOPED SOMETHING WAS OKAY AND PASSED IT ON AS OKAY WHEN
YOU DIDN'T KNOW? ________
(Handle as a withhold. Then strip off any false data he has in the
area. )
5P. HAVE YOU PRETENDED KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE YOU DID NOT HAVE?
________
(Handle as a withhold.)
5Q. HAVE YOU GIVEN FALSE DATA TO GET OUT OF SOMETHING? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
5R. HAVE YOU EVER LIED ABOUT ANYTHING IN THIS AREA? ________
(Handle as a withhold.)
SECTION 6
6A. WAS YOUR ETHICS HANDLING MESSED UP? ________
(Indicate it and 2WC E/S to F/N. If necessary, assess the appropriate
correction list to handle the BPC.)
6B. WERE YOU NOT HANDLED ON YOUR ETHICS WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN?
________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program this ethics situation to be
handled by the debugger.)
6C. WERE YOU TOLD YOU WERE OUT-ETHICS WHEN YOU WEREN'T? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
6D. WAS THERE SOME OUT-ETHICS SITUATION THAT WAS NOT DETECTED?
________
(Pull this as a withhold. Then program for handling according to what
comes up.)
SECTION 7
7A. WERE YOU TRYING TO JUSTIFY YOUR ACTIONS? ________
(2WC the justifications E/S to F/N. Then check for and pull any O/Ws
in the area of the justifications.)
7B. WERE YOU TRYING TO JUSTIFY AN OVERT? ________
(2WC the justifications E/S to F/N. Then pull the overt.)
7C. WERE YOU TRYING TO LESSEN AN OVERT? ________
(2WC this E/S to F/N. Pull the overt.)
7D. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT MAKES IT OK FOR YOU NOT TO GET YOUR PRODUCT
OUT? ________
(Have him tell you about it E/S to F/N. Then strip off the
justification per HCOB 7 Aug 79 Product Debug Series 8, Esto Series 36
FALSE DATA STRIPPING.)
7E. IS THERE SOME REASON WHY PRODUCING AN OVERT PRODUCT IS ALL RIGHT?
________
(2WC it E/S to F/N. Then strip off the justification per HCOB 7 Aug
79 Product Debug Series 8, Esto Series 36 FALSE DATA STRIPPING. )
7F. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT MAKES IT OK FOR YOU NOT TO BE COMPETENT ON
YOUR POST? ________
(2WC it E/S to F/N. Then strip off the justification per HCOB 7 Aug
79 Product Debug Series 8, Esto Series 36 FALSE DATA STRIPPING. )
SECTION 8
8A. IS THERE SOME IDEA YOU WERE USING TO MAKE YOURSELF RIGHT AND OTHERS
WRONG? ________
(2WC him on this and get him to spot and tell you the service
facsimile without getting into listing for it. What you are trying to
do is get him to find and blow the service facsimile by recall. If he
does not come up with the service facsimile complete the 2WC to F/N and
program him for full service facsimile handling.)
8B. WERE YOU TRYING TO MAKE YOURSELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG?
________
(Handle this as in 8A above.)
8C. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU ARE DOING TO MAKE YOURSELF RIGHT?
________
(Handle as in 8A above.)
8D. IS THERE A METHOD OF MAKING OTHERS WRONG? ________
(Handle as in 8A above.)
8E. ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT BEING RIGHT OR WRONG? ________
(2WC this E/S to F/N. Program him for full service facsimile
handling. )
8F. WAS YOUR SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING MESSED UP? ________
(Determine if it is an L&N error or an incomplete list and if so,
handle per HCOB 11 Apr 77 LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF and C/S Series 78.
Otherwise clean up the BPC with an L1C and program him to have any
incomplete handling on service facsimiles completed.)
SECTION 9
9A. WAS THERE BAD CRAMMING? ________
(Assess and handle a Cramming Repair List.)
9B. WERE YOU NOT CRAMMED WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to get the needed cramming done.)
9C. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG WITH YOUR CRAMMING? ________
(Assess and handle a Cramming Repair List.)
9D. FAILED TO LOOK OVER THE MATERIALS OF WHICH YOU HAD FALSE DATA OR MUs
ON AFTER YOU WERE CLEANED UP AND WERE STILL BLANK ON THE
MATERIALS BECAUSE YOU HADN'T GONE THROUGH THEM AGAIN? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to re-cover and restudy the materials
and send the Cramming Officer to Ethics.)
9E. DID THE CRAMMING OFFICER JUST SYMPATHIZE WITH YOU? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send the Cramming Officer to Ethics.)
SECTION 10
10A WAS THERE SOME PERSONNEL BUG THAT WAS NOT HANDLED? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program this to be handled with debug tech.)
10B WAS THERE SOME SORT OF TROUBLE WITH PERSONNEL THAT WAS NOT FOUND?
________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling according to what
comes up.)
SECTION 11
11A IS THERE SOME PROBLEM WITH YOUR COMM LINES? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for further handling with debug tech.)
11B NO ORDERS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for handling with debug tech.)
11C CROSS-ORDERS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for handling with debug tech.)
11D ILLEGAL ORDERS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for handling with debug tech.)
11E SOME OTHER TROUBLE WITH ORDERS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for handling with debug tech.)
SECTION 12
12A ARE YOU UNABLE TO STUDY? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program him for the M8 and M9 program and PCRD if
necessary.)
12B WAS THERE SOME DIFFICULTY WITH HATTING THAT WAS NOT FOUND?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
12C WERE YOU PREVENTED FROM GETTING HATTED? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
12D WAS THERE SOME OTHER PROBLEM WITH HATTING OR STUDY? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
12E IS THERE NO HATTING COURSE? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. See that a hatting course is established and that he
studies meanwhile.)
12F ARE THERE NO HATS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program him to compile his A-I Hat.)
SECTION 13
13A WAS YOUR PRODUCT CLEARING MESSED UP? ________
(Assess and handle a Product Clearing Correction List.)
13B WAS YOUR PRODUCT INVALIDATED? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)
13C DIDN'T YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR PRODUCT WAS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for Product Clearing.)
13D WAS PRODUCT CLEARING NOT DONE? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for Product Clearing.)
SECTION 14
14A WAS YOUR CLAY TABLE PTS HANDLING MESSED UP? ________
(Assess and handle the PTS Clay Table Repair List.)
14B ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE WHO IS ANTAGONISTIC TO YOU?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send him to get routine PTS handling and program him
for PTS Clay Table Handling.)
14C ARE YOU CONNECTED TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING THAT IS SUPPRESSIVE TO YOU?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send him to get routine PTS handling and program him
for PTS Clay Table Handling.)
14D DID SOMEONE SAY YOU WERE PTS WHEN YOU WEREN'T? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
14E ACCIDENTS? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Send him to get routine PTS handling and program him
for PTS Clay Table Handling.)
14F ARE THERE LOTS OF PROBLEMS IN YOUR AREA? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program him and any other PTS personnel in his area
for PTS handling including Clay Table De-PTSing.)
SECTION 15
15A WAS THERE SOME EXTERIOR INFLUENCE THAT WAS NOT HANDLED?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
15B IS THERE SOMETHING STOPPING YOUR PRODUCTION WHICH IS OUT OF YOUR
CONTROL? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
SECTION 16
16A WAS THERE SOME SORT OF ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEM? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
16B WAS THERE SOME ORGANIZATIONAL TROUBLE THAT WAS NOT LOCATED?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
SECTION 17
17A WERE THERE FALSE READS? ________
(Indicate and take E/S to F/N.)
17B WERE THERE MISSED READS? ________
(Indicate and take E/S to F/N. Program him to get what was missed
handled with debug tech.)
17C WERE YOU HANDLED ON SOMETHING THAT DIDN'T NEED HANDLING?
________
(Get what and indicate the unnecessary action. Take it E/S to F/N.)
17D WAS THERE SOMETHING WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN UP THAT WASN'T?
________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program for handling with debug tech.)
17E WAS SOMETHING QUICKIED? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N. Note for handling with debug tech.)
17F WAS SOMETHING LEFT INCOMPLETE? ________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Program this to be completed per debug tech.)
17G WAS SOME PART OF THE DEBUG OVERRUN? ________
(Indicate and rehab to F/N.)
17H WAS SOMETHING MISSED? ________
(Find out what and 2WC E/S to F/N. Pull any M/W/Hs.)
SECTION 18
18A WAS SOME PART OF THE DEBUG UNNECESSARY? ________
(Indicate and 2WC E/S to F/N.)
18B WERE YOU NOT HAVING ANY TROUBLE GETTING OUT YOUR PRODUCTS IN THE
FIRST PLACE? ________
(If this is actually the case indicate to him that trying to debug
his products when he was already getting them out was an unnecessary
action. If necessary take it E/S to F/N.)
18C WERE YOUR PRODUCTS ACTUALLY BEING GOTTEN OUT? ________
(If this is actually the case indicate to him that trying to debug
his products when he was already getting them out was an unnecessary
action. If necessary take it E/S to F/N.)
SECTION 19
19A WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? ________
(Find out what and handle with the appropriate correction list.)
19B WERE YOU IN SOME SORT OF CASE TROUBLE? ________
(Assess and handle a C/S 53.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 AUGUST 1979
Issue I
Remimeo
Product Officers
Org Officers
Execs
All Staff
Programs Chiefs
Project Operators
Mission Operators
Missionaires
Assistant Guardians Product Debug Series 1
Flag Representatives
LRH Communicators
Cramming Officers Esto Series 37
Review
DEBUG TECH
Ref: LRH ED 302 INT DEBUG TECH BREAKTHROUGH
HCO PL 23 Aug 79 II DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST
HCOB 23 Aug 79 II PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST
HCOB 17 fun 79 URGENT, IMPORTANT-CRASHING
MlS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED
CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS
HCOB 7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING
HCO PL 26 Mar 79RA MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND
CYCLES OF ACTION-MU
WORDS AND NO PRODUCTS
HCOB 23 Aug 79 I CRASHING Mu's BLOCKS TO
FINDING THEM
When I wrote LRH ED 302 DEBUG TECH BREAKTHROUGH in February of this
year I promised that there would be a policy letter issued covering the
tech more fully. Well, there have been further breakthroughs in the area of
debugging production. The tech given in that LRH ED has been acclaimed by
hundreds to be miraculous. This policy reissues that tech and brings it up
to date with the new discoveries.
HISTORY
Recently I noticed quite a few programs were not progressing rapidly. I
found many targets bugged. Project Operators did not seem to know what to
do and were getting losses and becoming frustrated. Their targets were
"bugged."
"Bugged" is slang for snarled up or halted.
"Debug" means to get the snarls or stops out of something.
I had always been given to believe somebody had developed and written
up debug tech. People would often tell me they had debugged this or that,
so of course I assumed that the tech existed and that issues and
checksheets existed and were in use. Yet here were people operating
projects who couldn't get the targets done by themselves or others.
I didn't recall ever having written any policy letter containing the
tech of debugging programs or targets.
So I called for the various "Debug Checksheets" and "Debug Issues" they
were using and found something very astonishing. None had any real tech on
them to debug something. They just had various quotes that did not
necessarily apply.
I did a study of the subject based on what people trying to debug
should be doing and what they were not doing and developed a fast,
relatively simple system. Some Project Operators were located in very
bugged areas which had brought them to apathy and even tears of
frustration. The new debug tech was put into their hands and they came
streaming back in wild excitement. It worked! Their areas were rolling!
I am releasing this tech to you as it is vital that programs are
quickly executed and that production occurs.
This debug tech is tested, fully valid and for immediate use.
Debug tech is a vital executive tool. Anyone who is responsible for
getting targets and programs executed, getting production out, turning
insolvency into solvency and generally making a better world frankly can't
live without it.
Debug tech is used to debug program targets, programs, a lack of
completion of the cycles of action which lead to production and in short,
whenever there is any insufficiency of viable products coming from an area,
org or individual.
THE TECH
1. INSPECTION
The first action in debugging an area is an inspection to see what is
going on in terms of production. In inspecting the area you do the
following:
1. You look for what products have been gotten out in the past.
2. You look for products that are there completed.
3. You look for what products can be attained in the immediate
future.
4. You look for the value of the products produced as compared to
the overall cost of the production organization.
5. You look for overt products or cycles where products
continuously have to be redone, resulting in no or few products.
The full volume of data on how to do an investigation is given in the
Investigations Checksheet on page 175 of The Volunteer Minister's Handbook.
When you first inspect an area for products you just look. Policies on
"Look Don't Listen" apply (HCO PL 16 Mar 72, Esto Series 8, LOOK DON'T
LISTEN). Don't listen to how they are going to get 150 products, just look
and walk around with a clipboard.
If you don't see 150 products waiting to be shipped or invoices showing
they have been, they don't exist. If you don't see receipts for 150 shipped
products, they don't exist and never have. The product is either there or
there is ample shipping or departure or finance evidence that they have
just left or been shipped. Products that are only in people's heads don't
exist.
Dreams are nice-in fact they are essential in life but they have to be
materialized into the physical universe before they exist as products.
The most wide trap the debugger can fall into is, "But next week . . . ,"
since experience will tell you that next week's production may never
arrive. The definition of product is something that can be exchanged for a
valuable product or currency. They have subproducts. These are necessary. A
subproduct can also be an overt product and block final products.
When you have done your product inspection, you then look over the
period of time from a viewpoint of time and motion. This is to answer the
question, "Are things arranged so that there is no time wasted in useless
motions which are unnecessary?" This includes poor placement of materiel on
a flow line or tool sheds five miles from the site of work so that one has
to go there every time one wants a hammer, out-of-sequence flows or waits.
One counts up the amount of wasted time simply because of the
disorganization of a place. It isn't enough to say a place is disorganized.
How is this disorganization consuming time and motion which is not
resulting in a higher quantity of production? Examples of this are quite
gross.
When you have done this study, during which of course you have made
notes, you will have the raw materials necessary to make an estimation of
the area.
If there is not an adequate and even spectacular record of products
getting out and if products have to be redone or if no products are coming
out, you proceed as follows:
II. PERSONAL HANDLING
Find a product that can be gotten out, any product, and insist that it
and products like it or similar cycles be gotten out flat out by the
existing personnel.
Do not let this debug act as an excuse for them not to produce. The
first step of this handling is to demand production.
When you have gotten them on that, you enter in upon a second stage of
debug. This consists essentially of finding if the place is knowledgeable
enough and able enough to produce what is actually required and what is
actually valuable or being needed from it.
This is accomplished as follows:
(Note: You should not attempt to find Crashing MUs, etc. until the
above inspection and the Steps A to H below have been done.)
A. Where are the orders relating to this target (or project or
production area)? (Can include policies, directives, orders, bulletins,
issues, despatches, tapes, valid texts and previous debugs and any and all
files.)
Handling: Collect up all of the orders relating to this target (or
project or production area). This includes the orders and policies the
person is operating off of as well as all those he should be operating off
of. At this point you may need to employ the "How to Defeat Verbal Tech
Checklist":
1. If it isn't written it isn't true.
2. If it's written, read it.
3. Did the person who wrote it have the authority or know how to
order it?
4. If you can't understand it, clarify it.
5. If you can't clarify it, clear the MUs.
6. If the MUs won't clear, query it.
7. Has it been altered from the original?
8. Get it validated as a correct, on-channel, on-policy, in-tech
order.
9. Only if it holds up this far, force others to read it and
follow it.
IF IT CAN'T BE RUN THROUGH AS ABOVE IT'S FALSE! CANCEL IT! And use HCOB
7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA STRIPPING as needed.
B. Have you read the orders?
Handling: If he has not read them then have him read, word clear and
starrate them.
Ca. Do you have MUs on these orders?
Handling: Get the orders word cleared using M4, M9 or M2 Word Clearing-
whatever Word Clearing is needed to fully clear any MUs he has.
Cb. Do you have false data on these orders?
Handling: Strip off the false data per HCOB/PL 7 Aug 79 FALSE DATA
STRIPPING .
Handle this step (Ca and Cb) until the person has duplicated the orders
and issues relating to this production area.
D. Are there financial or logistics problems on them?
Handling: Debug using HCO PL 14 Mar 72, Issue II, Esto Series 7, FOLLOW
POLICY AND LINES and Flag Divisional Directive of 25 Aug 76 FINANCIAL
PLANNING MEMBER HAT CHECKSHEET. Debugging this may require getting the
whole FP Committee through the FP pack.
E. Are there personnel problems?
Handling: Debug this using HCO PL 16 Mar 71 Org Series 25, Personnel
Series 19, LINES AND HATS and the Personnel Series, as given in The
Management Series.
It may be necessary to do this debug on the HAS or any person
responsible for getting the products of staff members who produce.
F. Are there hatting problems?
Handling: Handle this using full Word Clearing and False Data Stripping
and get the scene debugged using HCO PL 29 Jul 71 Personnel Series 21,
Org Series 28, WHY HATTING? and HCO PL 22 Sep 70 Personnel Series 9,
Org Series 4, HATS and HCO PL 27 Dec 70, Personnel Series 16, HATS
PROGRAM PITFALLS .
Hatting problems may include the total and utter lack of a hatting
course for the staff or a hatting course where WHAT IS A COURSE? PL is
flagrantly not in and if you find this you have gotten to the root of
why you are working hard debugging all over the place and it had better
be handled quick.
It may also be that the area senior doesn't make sure his staff puts in
study time off production hours and in this you may find the senior is
a failed student himself and this you would also have to handle.
Note: A person who cannot be hatted at all has false data. The handling
would be to strip off the false data.
G. Is there exterior influence stopping the production which
cannot be handled in the production area?
Handling: Handle using HCO PL 31 Jan 72, Data Series 22, THE WHY IS GOD
and HCO PL 25 May 73 Data Series 27, SUPPLEMENTARY EVALUATIONS and HCO
PL 30 Dec 70, Org Series 20, ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL.
When told that these exterior influences exist the wise debugger
immediately verifies. The simplest way to verify is to ask the person
who is supposed to be putting stops on the line if he has issued such
orders. You commonly find out he hasn't. But if he has, then you have
started to locate your area to handle.
You commonly run into verbal tech at which moment you use the "How to
Defeat Verbal Tech Checklist."
H. What other excuses exist?
Handling: As per HCO PL THE WHY IS GOD, HCO PL 19 May 70, Data Series
8, SANITY, HCO PL 30 Sep 73, Data Series 30, SITUATION HANDLING and
HCOB 19 Aug 67, THE SUPREME TEST.
And once any obvious ones in the above have been handled, and
production still isn't rolling, you have:
I. Routine finding of MUs per Word Clearing Series.
J. Crashing MU tech per HCOB 17 Jun 79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO
COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS. Crashing MU finding is done
exactly per this HCOB. Crashing MUs can be buried or suppressed as
covered in HCOB 23 Aug 79, CRASHING MUs, BLOCKS TO FINDING THEM. The
factors as listed in that HCOB which can cause a Crashing MU to remain
hidden and unknown may have to be handled before the Crashing MU
appears.
K. Do they have any idea at all that they should be getting out
any products? Or do they pretend to but don't?
Handling: Simply two-way comm of why the guy was there. It might come
as a startling realization that he is supposed to get out products.
This can be backed up with Exchange by Dynamics, HCO PL 4 Apr 72, Esto
Series 14, ETHICS and Short Form Product Clearing, HCO PL 13 Mar 72,
Esto Series 5, PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT ORDERS AND PRODUCTS or HCO
PL 23 Mar 72, Esto Series 11, FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM.
There is also such a thing as a person who will not complete a cycle of
action. This is normally true of what we call a "suppressive person" or
even an insane person.
Handling: Get the person's case looked into by a competent C/S and also
by the Ethics Officer for background.
But as PTS people are in suppressive persons' valences he may only be
PTS.
Handling: See Section P below for de-PTSing.
L. Wrong stat. The person has been given a stat that has nothing
to do with what he is supposed to produce.
Handling: get the right stat figured out so that it agrees with what he
is supposed to produce and actually measures his actual production.
M. Wrong VFP or wrong product? Do they have the idea of VFP right?
(or does the org think it's the award rather than the product, i.e. GI
rather than an audited paying pc or a trained paying student?).
It of course can occur, amazingly, that the person or department, etc.
is trying to turn out a product that has no exchange value. This can
occur because what they do produce is so flubby as to be called "an
overt product" which nobody can use further on up the line or even at
the end of the line. You handle this by coming down on their sense of
fitness of things. Overt products waste resources and time and
personnel and are actually more destructive than on first glance. They
cannot be exchanged but they also waste resources as well as lose any
expected return. You can remedy this sort of thing by improving their
tech so they do turn out something decent and useful.
They can also be turning out a type of product nobody wants-such as
1819 buggy whips in a Space Age. They may be great buggy whips but they
won't exchange because nobody wants them.
They may also be getting out products of excellent quality but never
tell anybody they have or do them. This can apply as narrowly as one
worker who doesn't tell anybody he is having or doing them or a whole
organization which, with complete asininity, never markets or
advertises their products.
It is also possible that a combination of all three things above may be
found.
It also may be they have all sorts of products they could get out but
they never dreamed of getting them out yet their life blood may depend
upon it.
Handling: HCO PL 24 Jul 78, SUBPRODUCTS, which tells how to compile a
subproducts list and attain VFPs. Exchange by Dynamics per HCO PL 4 Apr
72, Esto Series 14 ETHICS and Full Product Clearing Long Form on the
correct and actual VFP (as well as any other products the person or
area may have), as well as marketing and PR tech.
N. Never figured out what they would have to do to get a product?
Handling: Handle this using HCO PL 7 Aug 76, Issue I, II and III, Admin
Know-How Series 33, NAME YOUR PRODUCT, Admin Know-How Series 34, WANT
YOUR PRODUCT, Admin Know-How Series 35, TO GET YOU HAVE TO KNOW HOW TO
ORGANIZE, HCO PL 24 Jul 78, SUBPRODUCTS and HCO PL 14 Jan 69, OT ORGS.
O. Out-ethics?
Handling: Determine the situation and handle with O/W write-ups or
auditing and ethics conditions or correction of past conditions and the
ethics policies that apply.
P. Is the area or individual creating problems and demanding
solutions to them?
Handling: Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and
when available, get the personnel de-PTSed using Clay Table De-PTSing
as per HCOB CLAY TABLE DE-PTSing-THEORY AND ADMINISTRATION. (Note: Clay
Table De-PTSing can only be done on someone by a person who has had the
step himself . )
Q. Total organize? (Is the area organizing only?)
Handling: This is an indicator of many misunderstoods in the area,
especially on the part of its senior. The senior and the personnel in
the area need full Word Clearing on the materials to do with the
production area, including Crashing MU
finding as in J (ref: HCO PL 26 Mar 79RA MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS AND CYCLES
OF ACTION-MU WORDS AND NO PRODUCTS) off production hours and meanwhile
make them produce what they can.
R. Organization adequate to get the product?
Inadequate organization:
Handling: Debug the organization per HCO PL 13 Sep 70, Org Series 1,
BASIC ORGANIZATION, HCO PL 14 Sep 70, Org Series 2, COPE AND ORGANIZE,
HCO PL 14 Sep 70, Org Series 3, HOW TO ORGANIZE AN ORG, HCO PL 8 Oct
70, Org Series 8, ORGANIZING AND PRODUCT, HCO PL 29 Oct 70, Org Series
10, THE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATION BY PRODUCT.
No organization:
Handling: This is the situation where someone does not organize any
corner of his area or work or organizations or lines. This manifests
itself by irrational demands to only produce and to prevent any
organization so that production can occur. The handling is to clear the
misunderstoods (including Crashing MUs) in the area, particularly on
the purpose of the production and why one is producing.
Lacking a sense of organization?
Handling: Lack of a sense of organization lies below the level of MUs,
overts and withholds and PTSness-and you have to go north through
PTSness and overts and withholds to even get to the MUs.
The handling would be de-PTSing as in Step P. Then handle any overts
and withholds and then clear the MUs in the area being addressed
(including Crashing MUs.)
Debug tech is laid out as a checklist in HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue II,
DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST. It is a very useful checklist as the points of debug
can be assessed on a meter by an auditor (or any person trained to use an E-
Meter) or be administratively used by anyone wishing to debug an area.
HCOB 23 Aug 79, Issue IIs PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST is for use by an
auditor to repair someone who has been messed up by somebody trying to
debug his area. As faulty debugging can mess a person up, this repair list
has been written to remedy that, should it occur.
Normally, in an area that is very bogged and not producing, the first
question or two will deliver the reasons right into your hands. They are
trying to produce blue ruddy rods but the order they finally dig up after a
fifteen minute search says specifically and directly that green finglebums
are what are wanted here and that blue ruddy rods are forbidden. It is
usually outrageous and large. As you go down the list you will find out
that you are running into things which open the door to justification. So
you take very good care to notice the justifications which are being used.
The handling of justifications is indicated in HCOB 23 Aug 79, Issue I,
CRASHING MUs, BLOCKS TO FINDING THEM and the HCOB of JUSTIFICATIONS 21 Jan
AD10.
WHAT TO HANDLE
Handling of course is indicated by what you find and the above
references. But handling must always be in the direction of at least 50%
production. Even while debugging do not go for an all-organize handling.
Also do not go for an all-production handling.
A person, once trained on the data as contained in this PL, Crashing MU
tech, False Data Stripping and Product Clearing, will be able to get almost
any area debugged
and producing. It is important to remember that debug tech applies from the
very small expected action to the huge expected project.
THE EP OF DEBUG
The above debug actions are never carried on past the point where the
target or area or individual or org has been debugged.
Once production has been debugged and desirable products are now being
gotten for real in adequate quantity, the debug has been accomplished.
This could occur at any one of the above steps. And when it does you
let the area get on with producing the products they are now able to
produce.
EVALUATION AND PROGRAMMING
There is a whole different technology called Evaluation. The full tech
on how to execute and program is contained in the Data Series and the Data
Series Evaluator's Course and BPL 4 Jul 78 ELEMENTARY EVALUATOR'S COURSE
and the Target Series HCO PLs: 14 Jan 69 OT ORGS, 16 Jan 69 TARGETS, TYPES
OF, 18 Jan 69, Issue II, PLANNING AND TARGETS, 24 Jan 69, TARGET TYPES, 24
Jan 69, Issue II, PURPOSE AND TARGETS and HCO PL 4 Dec 73, Data Series 32,
TARGET TROUBLE. One is expected to know how to evaluate. But even after you
have evaluated, evaluations contain targets. And targets get bugged. So you
will need debug tech even when you are an accomplished evaluator.
With the debug tech and the added steps of Crashing MU finding, overts
and withholds, False' Data Stripping, Product Clearing, etc. you will be
able to crack the back of the most resistive nonproducing areas and get
them into roaring, high-morale production.
Between February 79 and 23 August 79 I have spent a great deal of
development time on the technology needed to completely debug people,
projects, targets and production. A very large number of missions
researches and pilots were undertaken to discover and polish up this tech.
It can now be considered a completed development cycle.
The above IS the tech.
USE IT!
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:kjm
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 AUGUST 1979
Issue II
Remimeo
Tech
Qual
All Execs
Programs Chiefs
Project Operators
Mission Operators
Missionaires
AGs
LRH Comms Esto Series 38
FRs
Product Debug Series 2
DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST
Ref: HCO PL 23 Aug 79 DEBUG TECH
Issue I
HCOB 23 Aug 79 PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST
Issue 11
The Product Debug Series
(This checklist is clarified by HCO PL 23 August 79, Issue I,
DEBUG TECH, and is used in conjunction with that PL.)
Production is the basis of morale. People who don't get products have
low morale.
Executives and responsible people have the task of getting out
products. When they don't get them out, the unit or organization fails.
It is extremely upsetting and puzzling to a staff member and to his
seniors when he can't get out the products expected of him. I have seen an
executive going around in circles for weeks trying to guess why such and
such a staff member couldn't get out the products of his post area. I have
seen staff members actually in tears because they were unable to achieve
the products of their post. I have also seen people busy, busy, busy and
totally unaware of the fact that they were producing absolutely nothing.
LRH ED 302 was a breakthrough. It has now been written into HCO PL 10
June 79, DEBUG TECH and contains a considerably expanded tech on how to
debug products. People have had very great success in applying it.
To give them even greater successes, I have rewritten LRH ED 302-1 into
this PL. The whole object of this checklist is to debug a lack of products
and accomplishments of an org or post.
This Debug Checklist is used in conjunction with HCO PL DEBUG TECH. It
gives the person doing the debug a list of things that could be standing in
the way of production. The sequence of handling is as laid out in the debug
tech PL. The first action is an inspection of the area. Then come the
personal handling steps.
This sequence must be followed in any debug action. For instance, if
you haven't done the inspection then how would you know what it is you are
trying to debug?
This checklist can be assessed on a meter or be administratively used
(off the meter) by Mission Operators, Program Operators, Project Operators,
evaluators, executives and anyone else needing to debug a cycle of action
or lack of products, including any staff member or student himself.
When assessed on a meter, each reading line would be taken to F/N by doing
the handling given for that line.
When doing this checklist the individual should have the issues and
references he may need to carry out the handlings along with him.
THE EP OF DEBUG
Debug actions are never carried on past the point where the target or
area or individual or org has been debugged.
Once production has been debugged and desirable products are now being
gotten for real in adequate quantity, the debug has been accomplished.
This could occur at any one of the steps. And when it does you let the
area get on with producing the products they are now able to produce.
PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST
In case of a bog or trouble on the following checklist use HCOB 23 Aug
79, Issue II, Product Debug Series 10, PRODUCT DEBUG REPAIR LIST to repair
the person so he can continue with the debug actions.
INSPECTION
00. The first action in debugging an area is an inspection to see what is
going on in terms of production. In inspecting the area you do the
following:
1) You look for what products have been gotten out in the past.
2) You look for products that are there completed.
3) You look for what products can be attained in the immediate
future.
4) You look for the value of the products produced as compared to
the overall cost of the production organization.
5) You look for overt products or cycles where products
continuously have to be redone, resulting in no or few products.
Full data on how to do this inspection is given in HCO PL 23 Aug 79,
Issue I, DEBUG TECH.
0. Find a product that can be gotten out, any product, and insist that
it and products like it or similar cycles be gotten out flat out by the
existing personnel.
THE CHECKLIST
Section A:
A1. NO ORDERS? ________
(Find out if (a) he's needing orders due to not knowing his hat or if
(b) he's not getting any direction or guidance from his senior. Handle
(a) by getting him hatted, or (b) by doing this checklist on his
senior.)
A2. NEVER RECEIVED THE ORDERS? ________
(Have him get the orders and handle any cut line that isn't relaying
the orders.)
A3. CROSS-ORDERS? ________
(Find out what and handle per HCO PL 13 Jan AD29, ORDERS, ILLEGAL AND
CROSS.)
A4. ILLEGAL ORDERS? ________
(Find out what and handle per HCO PL 13 Jan AD29, ORDERS, ILLEGAL AND
CROSS.)
A5. VERBAL TECH? ________
(Find out what and handle per the "How to Defeat Verbal Tech
Checklist" and HCO PL 7 Aug 79, FALSE DATA STRIPPING.)
Section B.:
B1. HASN'T READ THE ORDERS? ________
(Have him read, word clear and starrate the orders.)
B2. AVOIDANCE OR NEGATION OF POLICY? ________
(Pull the O/Ws per W/H system. Then clear up his MUs on the relevant
policy.)
B3. POLICY UNKNOWN? ________
(Determine what applicable policy is unknown to him and have him
read, word clear and starrate it.)
B4. NO POLICY? ________
(Have him work out what the policy should be and submit it for
approval.)
B5. LACK OF TECH? ________
(Have him get familiar with the exact problem he's encountering and
make him work out a solution that will handle it.)
Section C:
C1. MISUNDERSTOODS? ________
(Find and clear the MUs.)
C2. MISUNDERSTOODS ON THE ORDERS? ________
(Find and clear the MUs.)
C3. DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE ORDERS? ________
(Handle with Word Clearing and False Data Stripping.)
C4. FALSE DATA ON THE ORDERS? ________
(Handle with HCO PL 7 Aug 79, FALSE DATA STRIPPING.)
C5. OUT OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ORDERS? ________
(Handle any out-ruds. Then handle with Word Clearing and False Data
Stripping.)
C6. LACK OF INTEREST? ________
(Find out if it's out-ruds or MUs or past failures and handle
accordingly. )
C7. NO INTEREST? ________
(Find out if it's out-ruds or MUs or past failures and handle
accordingly. )
C8. LACK OF VALUE OF THE CYCLE OF ACTION ITSELF? ________
(Find his MUs and handle. Have him demo out the cycle of action.)
Section D:
D1. FINANCE BUGS? ________
(Find out what and get it debugged and also if it amounts to that,
get the whole FP Committee through the FP pack.)
D2. LOGISTICS PROBLEMS? ________
(Find out what it is and handle with HCO PL 14 Mar 72, Issue II, Esto
Series 7, FOLLOW POLICY AND LINES, and any other debug tech needed.)
D3. NO EQUIPMENT? ________
(Find out what is needed, if it is really needed, and if so debug it
per Do and D2 above so it is gotten. Remember that there are enormous
percentages of people who absolutely have to have before they can
possibly do and use that usually as an excuse not to produce.)
Section E:
E1. SCARCITY OF PERSONNEL? ________
(Indicate it and then investigate and handle HCO which is usually up
to its ears in personnel requests and busy on them instead of putting
an HCO there that properly recruits, hats, and utilizes personnel. This
may mean doing this Debug Checklist on the HAS or any person
responsible for that division or activity because they aren't getting
the products of staff members who produce . )
E2. SOME OTHER PROBLEM WITH PERSONNEL? ________
(Debug this using HCO PL 16 Mar 71, Org Series 25, Personnel Series
19, LINES AND HATS and the Personnel Series as given in The Management
Series. )
Section F.:
F1. ABSENCE OF HATTING? ________
(Find out if it's (a) lack of a hatting course for the staff, (b) a
hatting course where WHAT IS A COURSE? PL is flagrantly not in, (c) the
area senior doesn't make sure his staff put in study time off
production hours or (d) some other reason why he does not go to study.
Handle according to what comes up and HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue I, DEBUG
TECH.)
F2. DOESN'T ATTEND STUDY? ________
(Find out if it's (a) lack of a hatting course for the staff, (b) a
hatting course where WHAT IS A COURSE? PL is flagrantly not in, (c) the
area senior doesn't make sure his staff put in study time off
production hours or (d) some other reason why he does not go to study.
Handle according to what comes up and HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue I, DEBUG
TECH.)
F3. ABSENCE OF DRILLING? ________
(Get any needed drilling on equipment and actions done.)
F4. ABSENCE OF CRAMMING? ________
(Get the subject cramming is needed on and send him to Cramming.)
F5. FALSE CRAMMING? ________
(Handle per HCO PL 7 Aug 79, FALSE DATA STRIPPING. Assess and handle
a Cramming Repair List if necessary.)
F6. A DISASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE DEFINITION AND THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE?
________
(Have him demonstrate-in clay if necessary-and give real examples of
the definition. Program him for M8 and M9 program and the
Disassociation Rundown.)
F7. FALSE DATA ON THE HATTING MATERIALS? ________
(Handle with False Data Stripping.)
F8. LACK OF TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW? ________
(Locate the area of technical know-how he is lacking in and get him
studying and drilling the tech on it.)
F9. UNABLE TO BE HATTED? ________
(Strip off the false data in the area with False Data Stripping.)
Section C:
G1. EXTERIOR INFLUENCE STOPPING THE PRODUCTION WHICH CANNOT BE HANDLED IN
THE PRODUCTION AREA? ________
(Handle per Section G of HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue I, DEBUG TECH.)
Section H:
H1. OTHER EVENTS? ________
(Find out what and handle per HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue I, DEBUG TECH.)
H2. OTHER REASONS? ________
(Find out what and handle per HCO PL 23 Aug 79, Issue I, DEBUG TECH.)
H3. HUGE PRODUCTION BUG? ________
(Find out what and use full debug tech to handle.)
H4. TIME? ________
(Find out if there's just NOT ENOUGH time to do what he has to do or
if he's wasting time by not being organized or is being Dev-Ted and
handle.)
H5. LACK OF PROXIMITY TO THE SCENE? ________
(Have him get on the correct comm lines and get in ARC with the
scene. Handle ruds if necessary.)
H6. NO COMM LINES? ________
(Determine whether this is from W/Hs or MUs and handle accordingly. )
H7. INABILITY TO COMMUNICATE? ________
(Pull his W/Hs. Make him do Reach and Withdraw on the people and
objects of his area. Program him for the M8 and M9 program course.)
H8. ABSENCE OF ALTITUDE? ________
(Have him read HCO PL 4 Oct 68, ETHICS PRESENCE and Exec Series 1 and
2 and have him demo how he can use them.)
H9. BAD HEALTH? ________
(Send him to the MO on an MO Routing Form and get it handled. Get any
needed PTS handling done.)
H10. LUCK? ________
(2WC his considerations on it and bring his cause level up by getting
him to look at what he can do about it.)
Section I:
I1. MISUNDERSTOODS IN THE PRODUCTION AREA? ________
(Routine Word Clearing per the Word Clearing Series.)
I2. MISUNDERSTOODS ON WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE DONE? ________
(Routine Word Clearing per the Word Clearing Series.)
I3. CONFUSIONS IN THE AREA? ________
(Routine Word Clearing per the Word Clearing Series.)
Section J:
J1. CRASHING MISUNDERSTOOD? ________
(Crashing MU finding per HCOB 17 June 79, CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO
COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS.)
J2. TROUBLE COMPLETING CYCLES OF ACTION IN THE PRODUCTION AREA?
________
(Crashing MU finding per HCOB 17 June 79 CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO
COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS.)
Section K:
K1. NO IDEA AT ALL THAT PRODUCTS SHOULD BE GOTTEN OUT? ________
(Simple two-way comm of why the guy is there. It might come as a
startling realization that he is supposed to get out any products. This
can be backed up by Exchange by Dynamics-HCO PL 4 Apr 72, Esto Series
14, ETHICS and Short Form Product Clearing per HCO PL 13 Mar 72, Esto
Series 5, PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT ORDERS AND PRODUCTS or HCO PL 23
Mar 72, Esto Series 11, FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM.)
K2. PRETENDING TO KNOW THAT PRODUCTS SHOULD BE GOTTEN OUT BUT DON'T?
________
(Simple two-way comm of why the guy is there. It might come as a
startling realization that he is supposed to get out any products. This
can be backed up by Exchange by Dynamics- HCO PL 4 Apr 72, Esto Series
14, ETHICS and Short Form Product Clearing per HCO PL 13 Mar 72, Esto
Series 5, PRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT ORDERS AND PRODUCTS or HCO PL 23
Mar 72, Esto Series 11, FULL PRODUCT CLEARING LONG FORM.)
K3. WON'T COMPLETE A CYCLE OF ACTION? ________
(Get the person's case looked into by a competent C/S and an Ethics
Officer for background. If you are dealing with a suppressive or insane
person, handle per ethics policies. If it is PTSness, get the person de-
PTSed.)
Section L:
L1. WRONG STAT? ________
(Get the right stat figured out so that it agrees with what he is
supposed to produce and actually measures his actual production.)
L2. DOES THE STAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE BEING
PRODUCED? ________
(Get the right stat figured out so that it agrees with what he is
supposed to produce and actually measures his actual production.)
Section M:
M1. WRONG VFP? ________
(Use HCO PL 24 July 78, SUB PRODUCTS and Exchange by Dynamics and
Full Product Clearing Long Form on the correct and actual VFP-as well
as any other products the person or area might have.)
M2. WRONG PRODUCT? ________
(Use HCO PL 24 July 78, SUBPRODUCTS and Exchange by Dynamics and Full
Product Clearing Long Form on the correct and actual VFP-as well as any
other products the person or area might have.)
M3. NO IDEA OF THE PRODUCT? ________
(Get a complete and accurate statement of the correct product and
Product Clear him on it. See also HCO PL 7 Aug 76, Issue I, Esto Series
31, PRODUCT/ORG OFFICER SYSTEM, NAME YOUR PRODUCT.)
M4. UNSURE OF WHAT THE PRODUCT IS? ________
(Get a complete and accurate statement of the correct product and
Product Clear him on it. See also HCO PL 7 Aug 76, Issue I, Esto Series
31, PRODUCT/ORG OFFICER SYSTEM, NAME YOUR PRODUCT.)
M5. THINKING IT'S THE AWARD RATHER THAN THE PRODUCT? ________
(Use HCO PL 24 July 78, SUBPRODUCTS and Exchange by Dynamics and Full
Product Clearing Long Form on the correct and actual VFP-as well as any
other products the person or area might have.)
M6. DOES THE PRODUCT HAVE NO EXCHANGE VALUE? ________
(Use HCO PL 24 July 78, SUB PRODUCTS and Exchange by Dynamics and
Full Product Clearing Long Form on the correct actual VFP-as well as
any other products the person or area might have, and per HCO PL 23 Aug
79, Issue I, DEBUG TECH, Section M.)
M7. OVERT PRODUCTS? ________
(Handle any W/Hs connected with this. Then handle per HCO PL DEBUG
TECH, Section M.)
M8. IS THE PRODUCT A PRODUCT THAT NOBODY WANTS? ________
(Handle any W/Hs connected with this. Then handle per HCO PL DEBUG
TECH, Section M.)
M9. NO MARKETING OR ADVERTISING OF THE PRODUCT? ________
(Handle any W/Hs connected with this. Then handle per HCO PL DEBUG
TECH, Section M.
Section N:
N1. NEVER FIGURED OUT WHAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE TO GET A PRODUCT?
________
(Handle per HCO PL DEBUG TECH, Section N.)
Section O:
O1. OUT-ETHICS? ________
(Determine the situation and handle with O/W write-ups or auditing
and ethics conditions or correction of past ethics conditions and the
ethics policies that apply.)
O2. ACTIVE COUNTER-INTENTION? ________
(Pull the O/Ws and then locate the MUs. Then watch him and remove him
if he remains CI.)
O3. ACTIVE COUNTER-INTENTION ON THE PART OF OTHERS? ________
(Find out who. Handle any agreement he has with their CI as a W/H.
Get the person or persons who have CI handled on their O/Ws and get
their MUs found. Remove if the person or persons remain CI.)
O4. OTHER- INTENTIONEDNESS? ________
(Pull the O/Ws and then locate the MUs. Then watch him and remove him
if he remains other-intentioned.)
O5. OTHER-INTENTIONEDNESS ON THE PART OF OTHERS? ________
(Find out who. Handle any agreement he has with their otherintention
as a W/H. Get the person or persons who have otherintention handled on
their O/Ws and get their MUs found. Remove if the person or persons
remain other-intentioned.)
Section P.:
P1. CREATING PROBLEMS AND DEMANDING SOLUTIONS TO THEM? ________
(Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and when
available get the personnel de-PTSed with Clay Table De-PTSing, as
covered in HCOB 28 Aug 79, CLAY TABLE DE-PTSING-THEORY AND
ADMINISTRATION.)
P2. LOTS OF UNSOLVABLE PROBLEMS IN THE AREA? ________
(Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and when
available get the personnel de-PTSed with Clay Table De-PTSing, as
covered in HCOB 28 Aug 79, CLAY TABLE DE-PTSING-THEORY AND
ADMINISTRATION.)
P3. CONNECTED TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING ANTAGONISTIC? ________
(Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and when
available get the personnel de-PTSed with Clay Table De-PTSing as
covered in HCOB 28 Aug 79, CLAY TABLE DE-PTSING-THEORY AND
ADMINISTRATION.)
P4. PTS? ________
(Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and when
available get the personnel de-PTSed with Clay Table De-PTSing, as
covered in HCOB 28 Aug 79, CLAY TABLE DE-PTSING-THEORY AND
ADMINISTRATION.)
P5. ACCIDENTS? ________
(Give the person PTS handling as per ethics policies. If and when
available get the personnel de-PTSed with Clay Table De-PTSing, as
covered in HCOB 28 Aug 79, CLAY TABLE DE-PTSING-THEORY AND
ADMINISTRATION.)
Section Q:
Q1. ORGANIZING ONLY? ________
(Handle his MUs in the area including any Crashing MUs.)
Q2. TOTAL ORGANIZATION? ________
(Handle his MUs in the area including any Crashing MUs.)
Section R.:
R1. ORGANIZATION INADEQUATE TO GET THE PRODUCT? ________
(Handle per Section R of HCO PL 23 Aug 79, DEBUG TECH.)
R2. LACK OF ORGANIZATION? ________
(Handle per Section R of HCO PL 23 Aug 79, DEBUG TECH.)
R3. NO ORGANIZING? ________
(Clear the misunderstood including Crashing MUs, in the production
area, particularly on the purpose of the production and why one is
producing.)
R4. LACK OF A SENSE OF ORGANIZATION? ________
(De-PTSing as covered in Section P. Then handle any overts and
withholds and then clear the MUs in the area, including Crashing MUs.)
R5. NO GRASP OF THE CONCEPT OF ORGANIZATION? ________
(De-PTSing as covered in Section P. Then handle any overts and
withholds and then clear the MUs in the area, including Crashing MUs.)
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nc
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1979
Remimeo
TR Course (Also issued as
TR Supervisors HCO PL 23 Sep 79
Cramming Officers same title.)
Auditors
C/Ses
CANCELLATION OF DESTRUCTIVE
BTBs AND BPLs ON TRs
There are many valid issues on TRs, all of which remain in full force.
The following issues are hereby canceled for the reasons stated in this
issue:
BTB 15 Aug 71R TR COURSE BUGS HANDLING
Rev. & Reiss. 3.7.74 as BTB
BTB 16 Aug 71R BREAKTHROUGH, TR COURSE
Rev. & Reiss. 31.7.74 as BTB
BTB 18 Aug 71R TR COURSE-HOW TO RUN
Rev. & Reiss. 24.8.74 as BTB
HCO PL 4 Nov 71 II ACADEMY PREREQUISITES
(not by LRH)
BTB 5 Nov 71R TR COURSE DEBUG DRILL
Rev. 24.4.78
HCO PL 6 Nov 71 III INTERNSHIPS LINEUP, AUDITOR
INTERNSHIPS
HCOB 7 Apr 73RA GRADIENTS IN TRs
Rev. 22.2.79
HCOB 8 Dec 74 TR 0-NOTES ON BLINKING
BTB 8 Mar 75 IV Cramming Series 5RB
TRs IN CRAMMING
BTB 20 Sep 72 TR TRAINING UNDER LRH
Reiss. 20.9.74 as BTB
BTB 13 Mar 75R TRs TRAINING BREAKTHROUGH
Rev. 30.4.75
FDD 32 DIV IX INT TRs THE HARD WAY
7 Jun 71
REASONS FOR CANCELLATION
The only source of technical data is LRH HCOBs, books and tapes.
The issues listed above have introduced false data, verbal data and
technical alter-is. See HCOB 23 Oct 75 TECHNICAL QUERIES, HCOB/HCO PL 9 Feb
79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH, HCOB/HCO PL 15 Feb 79 VERBAL TECH PENALTIES.
The specific points of out-tech introduced by these canceled issues are
given here, so that all will know what the specific out-tech is that is
being canceled.
1. BTB 15 Aug 71R, Rev. & Reiss. 3. 7. 74 as BTB, TR COURSE BUGS
HANDLING.
This BTB is canceled because it states that if the student reads on
"overrun?" that he is passed on the TR. This has given rise to false passes
and the idea that the TR student has a case on course.
TRs are not processes, they are drills. The student passes the TR when
he can do it competently.
2. BTB 16 Aug 71R, Rev. & Reiss. 31.7.74 as BTB. BREAKTHROUGH, TR
COURSE.
This BTB is canceled because it introduces the idea of a "Major Stable
Win," stressed that the 2 hour confront had been lifted and not to overrun
a person on TRs. It also states "It may take minutes to hours to a hundred
hours to achieve the major win."
Of course wins are gotten on doing TRs. But TRs are drilled until the
student does the TR competently and passes. The idea that TRs could take
"hundreds of hours" to get in is completely false. A competent Supervisor,
using LRH tech and not omitting any of it, should be able to get students
through the TR Course in a couple weeks at the most.
3. BTB 18 Aug 71R. Rev. & Reiss. 24.8.74 as BTB. TR COURSE-HOW TO RUN.
This BTB gives the idea that wriggling around, moving, fidgeting,
watering red eyes and blinking and swallowing are OK.
These manifestations show that a person is not confronting, is nervous,
afraid, flinching, or in grief. Of course the coach never insists that the
student mustn't blink, nor that he mustn't ever swallow. He coaches the
student to do the TRs until he can do them comfortably and competently, at
which point those manifestations of nonconfront are no longer present. A
good auditor can be there comfortably and would never distract a pc.
4. HCO PL 4 Nov 71 II. ACADEMY PREREQUISITE.
This issue omitted mention of the Hard TRs Course as an Academy
prerequisite, as a result of which the Hard TRs Course was dropped out of
the training for auditors.
A Hard TRs Course is essential to the ability to audit at any level of
auditing.
"Pat-a-cake" (meaning child's game) TRs were originally used in Div 6
for raw public to get them on a co-audit in London in the '50s and still
might be of some small value for raw public that never intended to be
auditors. But they sure won't pass or make a real auditor. In this era of
permissive education, forget the permissiveness. The day we dropped out
hard TRs, we entered an era of less case gain for pcs.
5. BTB 5 Nov OR. Rev. 24.4. 78, TR COURSE DEBUG DRILL.
This issue stresses the same points covered in No. I and No. 2 above
and gave rise to false passes and quickying.
6. HCO PL 6 Nov 71 III, INTERNSHIPS LINEUP. AUDITOR INTERNSHIPS.
This issue states that interns and auditors do daily TRs and gave rise
to the false idea that one's TRs could go out overnight and you'd have to
get them in again the next morning!
Once an auditor's TRs are in, they are IN. The way to get your TRs in
is to do the TRs Course. This doesn't mean that you can't do TRs again; it
is usual to check an auditor's TRs in Cramming and handle any outnesses.
But once TRs have been done fully and honestly, they are in! And they stay
in from there on out.
7. HCOB 7 Apr BRA, Rev. 22.2. 79. GRADIENTS IN TRs.
The earlier system, the one I originally used was successful. The
trouble was that others added in the idea "it takes a hundred hours," and
actually thought it would take them months to get through a TRs Course and
were sticking students in on one TR.
Cycling through the TRs remedies that but one must ask what it is
remedying? It's remedying a bunch of knuckle-headedness and invalidation in
the first place!
Cycling through the TRs has been given a new definition and action. The
student goes up through the TRs until he or she sticks, and then starts
back at the beginning of the TRs. It is a technical fact, that when one
cannot do a lower level TR, one is not likely to do an upper level TR. Get
the student through the TRs the Hard Way, each one to a pass, one at a
time. If the student hangs up or fails on a later TR, start him or her from
the beginning of the TRs again.
8. HCOB 8 Dec 74. TR 0-NOTES ON BLINKING.
This issue has been misinterpreted by some who figured that because the
coach doesn't flunk the student for a blink, that it was then OK for the
student to blink excessively in a distracting manner. This issue also
points out that the person is a thetan and not a body, but that doesn't
mean that it is OK for the student to writhe nervously in the chair and
call that TR 0.
The coach does not flunk a person because he blinked, nor does he flunk
the person because he breathed! But there's a big difference between
someone who can't confront who blinks excessively and squirms around
nervously and an auditor who can comfortably be there without flinching or
being distractive in any way to the preclear-which would be an Auditor Code
break. A good auditor is never distractive to a pc. And a person who can
confront doesn't have excessive body motion of any kind, he can be there
comfortably confronting.
"Blinkless TR 0" needs to be defined. It means that when a person's TR
0 is in he doesn't exhibit any manifestation of inability to confront
including blinking nervously, flinchingly or doing anything else that shows
a nonconfront.
Automatic body functions don't have anything to do with TRs and are not
taken up by the coach or Supervisor.
Nor do you do "pat-a-cake" TRs and you never pass someone who makes
reactive body motions. Get the student able to confront. Any good auditor
or Scientologist takes this ability for granted.
Totally blinkless wide open staring-eyed TR 0 and TR 0 Bullbait are not
a requirement for pass but any truly competent auditor can do it.
9. BTB 8 Mar 75 IV. Cramming Series 5RB, TRs IN CRAMMING.
This issue called for "daily TRs," the same error as is covered above
in No. 6.
10. BTB 20 Sep 72. Reiss. 20. 9. 74 as BTB. TR TRAINING UNDER LRH and BTB
13 Mar 75R. Rev. 30.4. 75 TRs TRAINING BREAKTHROUGH.
Both these issues introduced the false idea that an auditor should make
a question sound like a statement when assessing. This is incorrect as a
statement can be accusative or evaluative. This idea was a
misinterpretation of the fact that an assessment should have impingement.
The correct way to do assessments is covered in HCOB 22 Jul 78
ASSESSMENT TRs.
11. FDD 32 DIV IX INT (7 JUNE 71} TRs THE HARD WAY.
This issue stated "It may take weeks to get through plain TR 0." That
false idea gave TR Course students and Supervisors the idea that a TR
Course could take a long time and set everybody up for a lose.
Honestly, TRs the Hard Way can be done fully, thoroughly and to a result of
excellent TRs in a very short time. I can get somebody through TRs in three
days, and often have.
SUMMARY
False data on TRs, and how "difficult" they are to do, were entered
into the original tech. The tech then got dropped out of use and
"permissive TRs" crept in and then the TRs Course the Hard Way got dropped
out of the training of an auditor. There's no such thing as an auditor who
can't do TRs. Excellent TRs are the hallmark of a good auditor.
Scientologists are known for their TRs. But an auditor can't get results
without TRs and a good auditor gets case gain on a pc on his TRs and comm
cycle alone.
All the tech on TRs and TR training is available. Use it and make real
professional auditors who get results on every pc, every time.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dm.gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1979
Remimeo
All Tech/Qual
Cramming Hat
Cramming Series 19
FLYING RUDS IN CRAMMING
(Ref: HCOB 15 Oct 74 Cramming Series 15
CRAMMING OVER OUT-RUDS
HCOB 2 Jun 78R Cramming Series 18R
Rev. 14.6.78 CRAMMING REPAIR ASSESSMENT LIST)
Per HCOB 15 Oct 74 CRAMMING OVER OUT-RUDS, a Cramming Officer must not
try to cram over out-ruds. Despite this, there still have been instances of
persons being "handled" in cramming without the ruds having been gotten in,
so no handling got done at all.
HOW TO FLY RUDS IN CRAMMING
TO BEGIN ANY CRAMMING OF ANYONE, ASSESS THE RUDS INCLUDING OVERTS,
INVALIDATION AND EVALUATION AND FLY ANY THAT READ. THEN WHEN YOU HAVE
CLEARED UP THE READS TO F/Ns AND HAVE AN F/N, BEGIN THE EXACT CRAMMING
ORDERS INDICATED.
You can mimeo a small form on which to assess these and mark reads
which will save time. The form would look like this:
"Do you have ......
or,
"On (subject), do you have ......
an ARC break?" _____
a present time problem?" _____
a withhold?" _____
an overt?" _____
"Has there been any ......
invalidation?" _____
evaluation?" _____
The Cramming Officer would assess on the form above and clip it to the
worksheets.
PREVIOUSLY MISDONE CRAMMING
Misdone crammings and failure to fly the ruds in cramming will mess up
staff members, and undisclosed overts and withholds will prevent any gain,
not just in auditing but in Word Clearing or cramming or other Qual
corrective actions.
Resistance to cramming, protest of cramming or natter about cramming,
or other Qual corrective actions are indicative of out-ruds, especially
overts and withholds against cramming or Qual or on the subject on which
the cramming order was written.
These symptoms of resistance or natter can also stem from having been
crammed over out-ruds in the past, or having been mishandled in cramming.
The way to handle someone who has been crammed over out-ruds in the
past is to assess the following and fly each reading line to F/N:
"Have you been crammed over .....
an ARC break?" _____
a present time problem?" _____
a withhold?" _____
an overt?" _____
any invalidation?" _____
any evaluation?" _____
If someone is nattery about Cramming, Qual correction actions, or Qual,
use the assessment above on the subject of their complaint. E.g. you could
assess: "Have
you been Word Cleared over ?"
If the above does not resolve the matter fully, use the Cramming Repair
Assessment List (HCOB 2 Jun 78R), or other specific list such as the Word
Clearing Correction List (WCCL).
CRAMMING OFFICER QUALIFICATIONS
Because the Cramming Officer is required to do these actions, he or she
must get checked out on how to do them. Possibly a reason why some did not
fly the ruds despite HCOB 15 Oct 74 CRAMMING OVER OUT-RUDS, is that the
Cramming Officer did not know how to fly ruds and had not gotten himself
trained to do so, then either didn't fly ruds before he attempted to do the
cramming order, or did not do the cramming order at all "because the ruds
were out." Both of these errors show an effect attitude that no real
Cramming Officer (or Scientologist for that matter), would be guilty of.
Cramming Officers get tech in and being applied, staff members successful
and winning on their post and are therefore very causative.
A CRAMMING OFFICER MUST GET CHECKED OUT ON FLYING RUDS AND OVERTS AS
THESE ARE VITAL TECH OF THE CRAMMING HAT. IF A CLASSED AUDITOR, HE MUST GET
CHECKED OUT ON USE OF CORRECTION LISTS SUCH AS THE CRAMMING REPAIR
ASSESSMENT LIST, WCCL, ETC. FAILURE TO CHECK OUT ON AND USE THE TECH OF THE
POST IS AN ETHICS MATTER.
WORKSHEETS
The worksheets (W/Ses) of all such actions (i.e. ruds, Word Clearing,
crammings, Cramming Repair Lists, Product Debug Assessments and any other
Qual corrective action), are put in the pc folder and sent to the Case
Supervisor (C/S). The C/S will correct any out-tech or failure to fully
handle, and in the case of no F/N at Exams or other out-tech, red tags the
folder, until the matter is fully repaired.
These worksheets must be complete, accurate and legible. In the case of
a non F/N exam or other bad indicator, these have rush priority and must be
handled fast. All the rules regarding worksheets apply to cramming and any
other Qual corrective actions.
IS A C/S NEEDED
BEFORE FLYING RUDS IN CRAMMING?
Someone may wonder if he needs to get a C/S to fly the ruds before
doing so in a cramming action. The answer is: no. You do not need to get
the pc's folder to the C/S
before you fly the ruds in cramming. To do so would make an unnecessary
delay, and you don't need a C/S to fly somebody's ruds.
The C/S (Case Supervisor instruction) is contained in this issue, and
that is what you do.
FOLDER CHECK BEFORE CRAMMING
Sometimes a staff member has been known to have been started on and
left incomplete on several different actions. E.g. the staff member is
started on a cramming order, but before this is complete, someone starts
doing a Crashing Misunderstood handling on him, they end for lunch and
after lunch someone tries to start yet another action on the staff member.
This is a serious situation indeed and it could be enough to spin somebody.
So it is mandatory that before starting an action, you must check the
folder first. Cramming orders and flying ruds in cramming and other Qual
corrective actions do not require C/S OK before doing them as this would
put an unnecessary and arbitrary delay on the line, and could be used as an
excuse not to do the action. (E.g. "I couldn't fly his ruds because I
didn't have a C/S to 'fly the ruds', so I didn't do anything.") But since
one would not start a new cycle in the middle of another incomplete cycle,
and would not try to fly ruds or word clear over mutant or out-lists
(provided these really were out and not just a false or protest read), the
folder must be checked by the person who is going to do the action (this
only takes a minute to do).
BEFORE STARTING A CRAMMING OR OTHER QUAL CORRECTIVE ACTION, LOOK IN THE
FOLDER TO ENSURE THE PERSON ISN'T IN THE MIDDLE OF ANOTHER QUAL CORRECTIVE
ACTION, OR C/SED TO GET A FLUBBED ACTION REPAIRED. AFTER THE CRAMMING OR
OTHER QUAL CORRECTIVE ACTION, SEND THE FOLDER TO THE CASE SUPERVISOR WITH
LEGIBLE WORKSHEETS ON WHAT YOU DID AND THE EXAM FORM.
FESing
If a person has been "crammed" or has had other Qual corrective actions
and has gotten worse, or made no improvement, then get all Qual corrective
actions done on the person FESed by the Case Supervisor, and a program and
C/S to repair these, and get that program done. Comm Ev anyone who
interrupts or cross-orders or prevents such a program from being done, as
that would be suppressive. Such a program has the priority of repairing a
flubbed session and the folder is red tagged, until handled.
USE THE TECH
There are several new Qual corrective actions as well as all the
earlier tools of cramming. These produce spectacular results when done
correctly. Use this tech to make greatly enhanced staff members.
YOUR CRAMMING WILL BE MANY TIMES MORE EFFECTIVE AND POPULAR IF YOU DO
IT WITH THE CORRECT TECH.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Snr C/S Int
LRH:DM:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HCOB 24.9.79
ATTACHMENT 1
You can mimeo a small form on which to assess these and mark reads
which will save time. The form would look like this:
"Do you have ......
or,
"On (subject) . do you have ......
an ARC break?" _____
a present time problem?" _____
a withhold?" _____
an overt?" _____
"Has there been any ......
invalidation?" _____
evaluation?" _____
The Cramming Officer would assess on the form above and clip it to the
worksheets.
HCOB 24.9.79
ATTACHMENT 2
The way to handle someone who has been crammed over out-ruds in the
past is to assess the following and fly each reading line to F/N:
"Have you been crammed over ......
an ARC break?" _____
a present time problem?" _____
a withhold?" _____
an overt?" _____
any invalidation?" _____
any evaluation?" _____
If someone is nattery about Cramming, Qual Correction actions, or Qual,
use the assessment above on the subject of their complaint. E.g. you could
assess: "Have you been word cleared over _____?"
If the above does not resolve the matter fully, use the Cramming Repair
Assessment List (HCOB 2 Jun 78R), or other specific list such as the Word
Clearing Correction List (WCCL).
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 OCTOBER 1979
Remimeo
Word Clearing Series 66
CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING
People who have no idea of concept get bogged into terms and mechanics.
They can't operate at the level of concept and are extremely literal.
If anybody did this he couldn't do otherwise than find himself mixed up
in tanglefoot. It does a lot of good to clean up his tanglefoot and
meanings of words but unless this gets him up to conceptual thinking he'll
just continue to get in more and more tanglefoot.
Understanding is conceptual. You could handle things, objects and
symbols endlessly without achieving understanding or real communication
unless one finally was able to graduate up to conceptual comprehension.
People who are literal rather than literate simply haven't achieved
conceptual understanding.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 OCTOBER 1979
Remimeo
Staff Section
Officer
Staff Section
Hat
Quad
All Execs
All Staff
SSO RESPONSIBILITY FOR STANDARD STAFF COURSES
(Ref: HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
Reiss. 15.6.70
HCO PL 22 May 76 STAFF SECTION OFFICER HAT
HCO PL 30 Nov 76R ONLY SSO CAN TIP
Rev. 25.4.79
HCO PL 2 Aug 71 STUDY TIME
HCO PL 16 Mar 71R WHAT IS A COURSE?
Rev. 29.1.75
HCO PL 16 Mar 72 WHAT IS A COURSE, HIGH CRIME
HCO PL 30 Oct 78 COURSES-THEIR IDEAL SCENE
HCO PL 24 Oct 68 SUPERVISOR KNOW-HOW, RUNNING
THE CLASS
HCOB 21 Aug 79 TWINNING
HCO PL 15 Sep 70R ETHICS, IMPORTANT, EXECUTIVE
Rev. 25.4.79 RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRAINING STAFF
BPL 11 Dec 71 RB 11 HUBBARD MINI COURSE SUPERVISOR
Rev. 22.9.77 COURSE)
If staff are to be correctly hatted and trained, standard staff courses
must actually exist in the Staff Section in Qual to get this done
The purpose of the Staff Section Officer is to help Ron make real staff
members. It is not accomplished haphazardly.
Therefore, STANDARD STAFF COURSES ARE MANDATORY.
With this policy letter, it becomes a responsibility of the ED to make
sure that an SSO (Staff Section Officer) is posted (whether full or part
time as an additional duty) and it becomes a responsibility of any SSO
already posted or so posted to ensure that:
1. Staff courses are provided and running.
2. Staff courses are attended.
3. WHAT IS A COURSE? PL is in on all staff courses.
4. Staff courses must approach an ideal scene, per HCO PL 10 Oct
78 COURSES -THEIR IDEAL SCENE.
This requires manning up the Staff Section accordingly and it requires
getting the necessary study materials there.
An org that pleads "not enough personnel" to post an SSO and a Staff
Study Supervisor, or "no funds" for course materials is simply not going to
expand because they won't have the trained, hatted staff they need to
expand with.
PUTTING STAFF COURSES THERE
It has been demonstrated time and again over the years that tightly
scheduled, tightly run, well-supervised courses fill up and turn into
expanding courses. This is as true of staff courses as it is of courses
offered to the public.
Sloppy staff scheduling, no enforcement of study schedules, missing
course materials, lack of proper supervision are all contributory to staff
not studying. Under these conditions staff members stay away in droves.
Such conditions provide an excuse for the staff member who tries to avoid
study anyway (due to his misunderstoods) and they make it difficult for the
staff member who is honestly trying to get through his study TIP.
There is no valid excuse for any org not providing standard Scientology
study courses for its staff. Staff members are the most on-purpose
Scientologists around. They need and deserve to study on standard
Scientology courses and by that is meant courses with WHAT IS A COURSE? PL
fully in.
So the order for the SSO to "Put staff courses there" means WHAT IS A
COURSE? PL put in, in full force.
That requires a trained Staff Course Supervisor in there supervising
during scheduled staff study periods and doing it by the book. He has a
roll book and he calls the roll for each scheduled course period. He
targets his students, he enforces twinning, he ensures that misunderstoods
are being picked up and handled, he sees that checkouts get properly done,
he directs students with questions to the correct source reference and he
ensures slow or bogged students are debugged and gotten moving, using all
the new and current debugging tech.
It requires that checksheets exist for staff courses with the
bulletins, policy letters, tapes, mimeo issues and reference books called
for on the checksheet, available in the staff course room.
It means that materials such as clay, tape players, routing forms,
bulletin boards, student files, stat graphs, progress boards and other
items required in a standard course room are there for use and are used.
For a large staff a Staff Course Admin will be needed.
And there's got to be space provided so staff courses can be put in.
Ideally this would be in the Staff Section in Qual, not mixed in with
public courses.
Schedules are handled by working out three or four regular staff course
periods a day, morning, afternoon and evening. Each period would be 2/2
hours long, which is the amount of time each staff member is entitled to
daily. A staff member then gets assigned to the specific period which best
fits with his particular post or post time. He gets enrolled for that
period and he does his study during that period on a standard staff course.
Day staff would ordinarily study on Foundation hours and Foundation
staff would study during the day.
GETTING STAFF COURSES ATTENDED
The final and essential part of a course, per WHAT IS A COURSE? PL, is
STUDENTS .
The SSO is responsible for seeing to it that staff courses are
attended. One-half this battle is won by putting complete, standard, snap-
and-pop staff courses there. Such courses are inviting and students
gravitate to them.
EXECUTIVE SUPPORT
The other half of the battle is won by the SSO getting in firm liaison
lines with execs and seniors for their support in maintaining regular staff
study. Executives and seniors are also responsible for ensuring their
juniors are studying and getting hatted and trained. (Ref: HCO PL 15 Sep
70R, Rev. 25.4.79 ETHICS, IMPORTANT, EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRAINING
STAFF.)
Any executive worthy of the post will see to it that his staff are
being enhanced. That is actually one of the attributes of a successful
executive. Such a person demonstrates that he is aware of what it takes to
expand, that he's capable of that much planning and prediction and that
he's aware of the consequences of trying to maintain any kind of production
with untrained staff.
Too often seniors don't make their juniors study. The common plea will
be "production demands" or "we need to get this job done now and staff can
make up their study time later . . . ," etc., etc. But "later" never comes.
This is simply an indication of out-planning, out-targetting and the
inability to get in routine, organized actions. Such an exec is walking a
downhill road into a deeper and deeper mire of cope. He'll never get out of
cope with untrained, unhatted staff.
His only hope is to get in proper planning of the work load, with a
scheduled study time set up for each of his juniors and that schedule
enforced.
And here the SSO can be of real assistance to him.
PEOPLE WHO DON'T STUDY
The REAL underlying reason for people not studying is always
misunderstoods.
It will be found that executives and seniors who don't push study or
don't demand their juniors study, are very often bugged students
themselves.
It will also be found that those areas where staff aren't studying
regularly are, in most cases, the bugged and non-producing areas or areas
that are having a lot of difficulty .
These are actually both old known and proven facts that have been
proven time and time again.
The SSO must get the staff study Sups to debug those bugged students,
executives and staff alike, as behind every staff member or any student who
does not study is solely misunderstood words. It is not post problems or
other excuses. It will just be misunderstoods. Getting these cleaned up
will get the student winning on course and working to get himself or
herself to study daily.
Areas and people that study are in turn organized, upstat and
productive.
SSO AUTHORITY
With the SSO given the responsibility and the job of getting staff
hatted and trained, he or she must also be given the authority to get that
responsibility carried out and the job done.
THEREFORE, WITH THIS POLICY LETTER THE SSO IS EMPOWERED TO ASSIGN
PENALTIES AND TAKE ETHICS ACTION ON ANY EXECUTIVE OR SENIOR WHO DOES NOT
REGULARLY SEND HIS STAFF TO THE STAFF HATTING COURSE.
Such actions would range from a beginning warning or caution to ethics
chits or the calling of an Executive Court of Ethics on the offending exec
or senior. In the latter case, any amends assigned as the result of such a
Court would be done for the SSO in the SSO area or in the Staff Course
Section at the discretion of the SSO. In the case of continued omission or
refusal to get or support actions to get his juniors hatted and trained,
the executive or senior is subject to a Committee of Evidence on the charge
of treasonable neglect. (Ref: HCO PL 15 Sep 70R, Rev. 25.4.79 ETHICS,
IMPORTANT, EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRAINING STAFF.)
In situations where it becomes necessary for the SSO to issue chits or
take other action, per the above, on any executive, whether posted higher
on the org board or not, the SSO must be given ethics protection. No
executive or staff member has the right to prevent the SSO from doing his
job, to penalize him for such or to attempt to intimidate an SSO who is
validly carrying out the responsibilities of his post.
In any of the above justice actions initiated by the SSO, upstats would
always be taken into account, per the Justice PLs. An additional factor to
be considered. however, is that rising statistics do not continue rising
for long in the face of neglected hatting and training. Even upstats are
required to study and enforce study. "Upstats" is no excuse to not study or
for an exec to not push study.
SOME ADVICE FOR SSOs
If I were an SSO I'd grab this policy letter and run with it. I'd get a
real gung-ho campaign going for staff hatting and training. I'd get it all
handled before it became any kind of ethics situation.
I'd call a meeting of all the execs and Div Heads from the top down and
get their support and solid agreement on getting staff courses in and
maintained. That would have to include some finance personnel as well, as
their support and assistance and know-how will be needed when it comes to
obtaining the materials needed to comply with WHAT IS A COURSE? PL. I'd
make this policy letter as well as WIAC PL well known to each and every one
of them.
I'd do a survey on staff and execs and from it work out the three or
four best daily study times of 2t/2 hours each. I'd dispatch every senior
individually and meet with him personally if needed to get each of his
juniors assigned to a specific study period and make sure, from an org crew
list, that every single staff member was accounted for, schedule-wise. And
that every single one of them was there, at the assigned time, studying.
I'd demand a Staff Courses Supervisor and get recruitment actions
going, recruitment letters being written, to beef-up the Staff Section.
I'd make sure the Supervisor ran tight, snap-and-pop, absolutely
standard, intech, on-policy staff courses and I'd be in there checking
routinely to make sure it was happening.
I'd take a hard, cold, honest look at and inventory of training
materials and I'd work out a sound plan for getting the most needed items
first and start accumulating the rest as fast as possible. I'd have my POs
in to the FP Committee every week.
I'd promote training and hatting to the staff loud and clear in the org
newspaper, at musters and make sure they heard of staff course wins and
successes at every opportunity.
I'd just push relentlessly until I had every point of WHAT IS A COURSE?
PL soundly in.
And if I were an executive in an org I'd back up an SSO who did that,
100%.
Before long, staff courses would be humming along smoothly and routinely
and getting even bigger and better attended with word of mouth promotion
from satisfied staff members.
Production will increase, morale will shoot up, stats will rise and
with that staff pay will be higher and conditions improved. The whole scene
will be one of bustling, expanding activity, with staff enhanced.
There's a little work to it. It's not accomplished haphazardly or by
one person alone. But it can be done.
I'm counting on SSOs to get it done. And I'm counting on the executives
of every org to back up the SSO in getting it done.
Staff courses are not a luxury. They're a vital ingredient for the
sound future of your org.
So make staff courses well known and well thought of.
PUT STANDARD STAFF COURSES THERE.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:gal
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
Case Supervisors
Cramming Officers
Ds of P
Ds of T
Dir Correction
Tech/Qual
C/S Series 107
Cramming Series 20
Qual Corrective Actions on OTs Series 1
AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT POLICIES,
CRAMMING ASSIGNMENT POLICIES
(Ref: HCOB 23 Jul AD19 AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT POLICIES)
We have long had the rule that auditor-pc assignments must be by
comparable grade and class. Reasons for this are given in HCOB 23 Jul AD19,
which also sets the policy: "Therefore it is policy not to assign an
auditor whose grade and class is less than that of the pc."
This policy becomes even more important when handling assignments on
pre-OTs, because if the auditor were of lower case grade it would prevent
the pre-OT from communicating to the auditor and the auditor not being
aware of or trained on the materials of the level of case of the pre-OT,
would not be able to audit that pre-OT and would risk disaster for the pre-
OT as well as himself.
As Cramming Officers fly ruds in Cramming and as some of the Cramming
and Qual corrective actions can get into a person's case, this policy is
extended to apply to Cramming Officers, as well as auditors.
Therefore the following policies apply:
1. IT IS POLICY NOT TO ASSIGN AN AUDITOR WHOSE GRADE AND CLASS IS LESS
THAN THAT OF THE PC. (HCOB 23 Jul AD19)
2. IT IS POLICY TO ASSIGN ONLY GOOD PROVEN AUDITORS TO GOOD AUDITORS.
(HCOB 23 Jul AD19)
3. IT IS POLICY NOT TO ASSIGN NON-OT CRAMMING OFFICERS TO OTs AND THE
CRAMMING OFFICER MUST NOT BE OF LOWER CASE LEVEL THAN THE OT.
4. A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN AUDITED ON NED FOR OTs, MAY ONLY BE AUDITED OR
CRAMMED BY A NED FOR OTs AUDITOR.
The terms "auditor" and "Cramming Officer" in these policies above are
intended to include anyone acting in the capacity of an auditor or Cramming
Officer and the fact that one is not a trained or posted auditor or
Cramming Officer does not permit one to do auditing or Qual corrective
actions in violation of the policies above.
These policies apply to any auditing actions and to Qual corrective
actions such as Why Finding, metered debug actions, False Data Stripping,
Confessionals (whether done in Qual or HCO), Clay Table auditing and these
policies are intended to apply to any new Qual corrective actions released
in the future.
Subjective questions and metered actions which lead into a person's
case are not OK on OTs. Such actions are not advised on lower level cases
either, unless these have
been C/Sed for and are part of standard tech. Otherwise this type of action
is only a covert way of auditing the person while not calling it auditing
and is forbidden in C/S Series 29 CASE ACTIONS, OFFLINE. Nonstandard
actions or interviews done by untrained persons whose TRs and metering are
out are especially forbidden, as detrimental to cases. Definition of
"subjective": "Consultation with the preclear's own universe, with his mock
ups, and with his own thoughts and considerations." (COHA, page 167)
"Recall, think, remember or return on the time track processes are
subjective." (HCOB 2 Nov 57RA)
There are actions which are OK to do in Cramming. These are not related
to the person's case. They relate to his post and performance. These are
objective questions or actions. Definition of "objective": "Of or having to
do with a material object as distinguished from a mental concept, idea or
belief." (Dictionary) "Means here and now objects in PT as opposed to
'subjective'." (HCOB 2 Nov 57RA) Questions or actions by the Cramming
Officer which are objective and pertain to the person's post, the materials
which cover his post or that he is studying, clearing words misunderstood,
hatting actions and post or Product Debugs (provided subjective questions
are not asked on OTs) are all OK. The most usual and successful cramming
action is simply to take the materials or text that covers the subject of
the cramming order and word clear and cram those materials. This is always
safe and OK to do. (The only other caution is not to give verbal data, nor
to evaluate or invalidate or throw the person's ruds out while doing the
cram!)
It is not that OTs are difficult to handle. To the contrary OTs are far
easier and faster to handle than non-OTs. But OT cases must be handled as
OT cases or the person doing the handling risks invalidation of case level
of the OT and could get into aspects of the case that he/she knows nothing
about and is thus incapable of handling or repairing. OTs when handled on
the appropriate auditing and Qual corrective actions for their state of
case by auditors, Cramming Officers and C/Ses who are qualified to do so,
make very fast and spectacular gains.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Senior C/S Int
LRH:DM:kim
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
TR Course
TR Super
visors
Cramming
Officers
Auditors TRs BASICS RESURRECTED
C/Ses
Refs: HCOB 16 Aug 71 II TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED
Rev. 5.7.78
HCOB 23 Sep 79 CANCELLATION OF DESTRUCTIVE
BTBs and BPLs ON TRs
HCOB 5 Apr 73 AXIOM 28 AMENDED
BOOK: DIANETICS '55!
Chapter VII: COMMUNICATION
BOOK: PROBLEMS OF WORK
Chapter 6: AFFINITY, REALITY AND COMMUNICATION
BOOK: FUNDAMENTALS OF THOUGHT
Chapter 5: THE A-R-C TRIANGLE
HCO PL 7 Aug 79 Product Debug Series 8
Esto Series 36
FALSE DATA STRIPPING
HCO PL 9 Feb 79 II HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH
TRs have been under study and pilot for the past year as, just about
this time last year it became all too obvious, through review of the video-
taped TRs of special corps of auditors as well as those from piloted TRs
Courses, that students seemed to have become incapable of mastering the
TRs.
This presented a mystery, as I have always been able to teach TRs
effectively in about a week's time, give or take a few days. Once the
student has his basics in it's done by simply getting the student to DO it,
as TRs are not a "think" action nor a subjective action. They're practical
drills on the comm cycle. There's nothing subjective about them. TRs are a
doingness.
But we suddenly had entire corps of student auditors unable to master
these drills.
What had happened to the teaching of TRs?
A good many months were spent in isolating exactly what had gone wrong,
and it has now all been boiled down to a very few factors:
1. Hard TRs had been dropped out.
2. Doing the communication formula in clay had been omitted.
Those were the two major points of change and when these two were
omitted, that was it. That was the end of anybody being able to do TRs. One
can't master TRs without familiarity with the comm cycle. One can't master
TRs with permissive, pata-cake drilling. TRs are gotten in by drilling them
HARD.
It is one thing to try to teach Hard TRs to raw public and it is quite
another to make an auditor. People studying to become auditors have to be
made into auditors.
It's all right to teach a mild TRs Course in Division 6 and one should,
but when it comes to making auditors, there is no substitute for Hard TRs.
Somewhere along the line doing the communication formula in clay as the
beginning part of the TRs Course was dropped out. This left the student
with no slightest concept of why he was doing TRs. The communication
formula is a Scientology discovery and when you omit teaching it, the
student suffers from out-basics. So the omission of doing the communication
formula in clay on a TRs Course was fatal.
There were also three additional factors found to be further
influencing the scene:
3. Student auditors had no real understanding of the ARC triangle.
Thus, their Communication was stuck because their Affinity and
Reality and, therefore, their Understanding, were deficient.
4. The lack of a bona fide TRs checksheet had opened the way for
all kinds of false data to be entered into the subject.
5. Ignorance of the end phenomena of a TRs Course or why they were
doing TRs.
The result of this past year's study and piloting and the isolation of
these factors has now culminated in a full and final TRs Course which will
be issued very soon in unalterable book form.
Meantime, this bulletin is being issued as a holding action to make
these errors and omissions in the teaching and drilling of TRs broadly
known so that they can be remedied at once wherever auditor TRs are being
taught.
OMITTED CHECKSHEET AND FALSE DATA
Since the cancellation of HCO PL 24 May 71 THE PROFESSIONAL TR COURSE,
there has been no real TRs checksheet, complete with the basics of
communication and the theory of communication which underlie the TRs. That
was a huge out-basic right there. TRs as drills appeared on various
checksheets, sometimes with several accompanying bulletins, but omitted was
any thorough preliminary insequence study of the theory upon which the TRs
are based.
Here we had a course without a checksheet, which made it possible for
false data to spring in from various quarters. And so it did. It wasn't
that people were willfully entering false data into the subject. It was
simply that there was no standard checksheet which took the student through
the true data, and only the true data, on the simple basics (the ARC
triangle and the communication formula) underlying the TRs and then the TRs
drills themselves. With that situation you can get all kinds of false data
coming into an area. And that is exactly what was found. Almost one for one
the students coming onto the special piloted courses conducted this past
year were ridden with false data, various types of "think" and figure-
figure and alter-is of the tech of the TRs.
A number of BTBs and BPLs on the subject contributed to this scene and
actually perpetrated out-tech in the area, and these have now been
canceled, by specific title, by HCOB 23 Sep 79, CANCELLATION OF DESTRUCTIVE
BTBs AND BPLs ON TRs, which lists and corrects the outnesses these issues
introduced.
A further handling is to give the student the true data on
communication and TRs, as covered in the chapters on ARC in Problems of
Work and Fundamentals of Thought. the chapters on communication in
Dianetics .55!, and HCOB 16 Aug 71R, TRs REMODERNIZED. As he studies this,
one then digs up and strips off the false data accumulated on the subject
or drill, using HCO PL 7 Aug 79, FALSE DATA STRIPPING.
Where false data on a subject exists it hits immediately and directly
up against the true data, and until this conflict is blown by False Data
Stripping the person can be untrainable on the subject.
Thus this brand new tech tool, False Data Stripping, is and has been
tremendously useful in correcting TR outnesses and ensuring correct
training on the TRs.
It might be noted in passing that the most false subject on the planet
at this time is psychology because the mission of a psychologist is a
government one-to make the population into controllable zombies-the subject
is being taught earlier and earlier in schools and a lot of your students
and even Supervisors have been subjected to this propaganda and false data
about Man and the mind. I recall that the people it took longest to get
through TRs Courses were professional psychologists. The basis of this is
false data-they are loaded with it. It is not that psychology teaches
anything about communication (they never heard of the subject until we came
along) but that they simply have so many false data about life that they
actually can't study or drill in a life subject such as Scientology. And
you may find it necessary to clean this up. This prevents horrible slows on
TRs Courses. It's not an action that would be done in the course, of
course, but would be done in Review.
THE COMMUNICATION FORMULA IN CLAY
The TRs are drills on the various parts of the communication formula.
This basic datum seems to have become obscured in recent years. It
appeared that, to many, TRs were considered to be drills that were done for
the sake of doing drills, with only some vague accompanying idea of their
actual use or application or how they related to auditing and an auditing
session.
The truth of the matter is that TRs are simply the drills that enable a
person to polish and perfect his comm cycle.
But if one doesn't know what the cycle of communication is to begin
with, if one isn't totally familiar with the various parts of the
communication formula, the TRs as drills are not going to make much sense
to him. Drilling becomes a struggle because he doesn't even know what it is
he's trying to handle.
So one of the first things a TRs student needs is a sound understanding
of the communication formula.
The way to learn the communication formula is to do it in clay. That
defines it, puts it there in the physical universe for him. By
demonstrating the communication formula, all of its parts, in clay, he will
actually see how it works. It becomes real to him. Now he knows what it is
he's drilling.
Unfortunately, with the cancellation of the 24 May 71 TRs Checksheet
the basic action of demonstrating the communication formula in clay was
dropped out and with that a real understanding of the use of TRs was
obscured for many.
Representing the comm formula in clay is now reinstated firmly as a
vital preliminary step to drilling TRs.
USE OF THE ARC TRIANGLE
Even below an understanding of the communication formula comes an
understanding of the ARC triangle. Now we are getting more basic.
This turned up as a very interesting technical factor in reviewing
countless TR video tapes this past year. It was actually a very interesting
technical bug. I studied and studied these flunked video TR sessions to
find the common denominator of all of them, and I finally nailed it. What I
found was that they were specializing in "C," communication, on the ARC
triangle. They were specializing in "C" but what was out was their "A"
(affinity) and "R" (reality) and their "C" was being pegged-it would go up
just so far-because they weren't anywhere up the line on their "A" and " R.
"
As a result they couldn't understand anything the other guy was saying.
Most of the flubs were on this basis. They didn't have any pc there, they
weren't listening to what the pc said, the ARC was out the bottom.
The person gets stuck without full use of the ARC triangle. You can
raise the communication level but then you have to raise the reality and
then you have to raise the affinity and then you get some understanding.
Only then can you continue to improve each point of the triangle.
On most of those videos they were stuck with the communication being
raised just a bit, and that was that, because they weren't raising the
affinity and reality levels along with it. So they did not advance or
improve.
A handling is to make sure the student gets a very sound understanding
of the ARC triangle and its use before he tackles the TRs.
This can be accomplished by having him represent it in clay, using the
chapters on ARC in Fundamentals of Thought and Problems of Work and Chapter
VII of Dianetics 55!.
When he knows how A and R and C interrelate and how they're used to
bring about Understanding, he's then prepared to really grasp the
communication formula. And when he has a good familiarity with the
communication formula he can drill the TRs and polish up his own
communication cycle and improve with comparative ease.
TRs THE HARD WAY
When TRs the Hard Way slipped out of use and permissive TRs entered the
picture. the results were less competent auditors and less case gain for
pcs.
Auditor TRs must be taught rough, tough and hard. This does not mean
invalidative drilling or coaching or supervision. It does mean you get the
student to DO the TRs. He's got to drill the TRs, not figure-figure on them
or dive into his case to avoid them.
TRs the Hard Way means stringent, spot-on coaching and supervision on
the proper gradient. Each button found on the student is flattened before
it is left. Flunks are given when the student flunks. And when he flunks he
goes right back in again and he drills it until he's got it.
The TRs are taught and drilled per the 16 Aug 71R bulletin, TRAINING
DRILLS REMODERNIZED, and per the advices in HCOB 23 Sep 79, CANCELLATION OF
DESTRUCTIVE BTBs AND BPLs ON TRs. The student is coached to wins, not
losses. You make sure he understands the drill and after that it's a matter
of his DOING it. It's a matter of keeping him at it, getting him through
it, regardless of what buttons crop up to be flattened, until he's mastered
each TR and can handle any comm cycle with ease.
Permissive, namby-pamby, pat-a-cake TRs have no place in the training
of an auditor or on a bona fide TRs Course. A student who hasn't mastered
his TRs won't master any of the training that follows them. The way to
master TRs is to drill them the hard way.
It is Hard TRs that make an auditor. (A more gradient approach to TRs
would be taken on the HAS Course where the new Scientologist is getting his
first taste of how to handle communication in his everyday life and
livingness.)
Given sound training on the basics, ARCU and the formula of
communication with any false data stripped off, and the student then
drilled on TRs the Hard Way, to perfection, you'll find he comes through
with flying colors to a smooth, flubless comm cycle. And it doesn't take a
year or even months to accomplish it.
END PHENOMENON OF TRs
As the students really had no idea of the communication formula as such
due to the omission of the requirement that they do it in clay and learn
it, they of course didn't know where they were going. A surprising number
of students were heard making stupid remarks like, "I would never use the
TRs in auditing" which is about the same as saying "I would never use food
when I eat."
Practically no students on TRs Courses had any idea why they were doing
TRs or what had to be achieved in order to be a finished product on a TRs
Course. This unfortunately included the Supervisors and of course the
coaches. So one got all sorts of silly, invalidative, evaluative teaching
and coaching.
If they didn't know where they were going and what the end phenomenon
of a TRs Course was, of course they couldn't train a student toward it and
so TRs Courses which would only involve a week or two turned into months
and months of floundering around due to miscoaching and mainly destructive
criticism which had no purpose.
Instruction and coaching are not based on opinion. They should be based
on producing the end phenomenon.
The PRIMARY VALUABLE FINAL PRODUCT of TRs is:
A professional auditor who with comm handling alone can keep a pc
interested in his own case and willing to talk to the auditor.
The SECONDARY VALUABLE FINAL PRODUCT of TRs is:
A person with the session and social presence of a professional auditor
and that presence can be summed up as a being who can handle anyone with
communication alone and whose communication can stand up faultlessly to any
session or social situation no matter how rough.
The END PHENOMENON of TRs is:
A being who knows he can achieve both of the above flawlessly and from
here on out.
That's the EP and that's the direction all instruction and coaching
must take. Each TR must be in against the standard above.
As we know the communication formula and as the TRs are parts of it,
the end phenomenon can be achieved relatively rapidly. It is that we know,
for the first time in man's history, the communication formula that makes
it possible to drill people on it and produce the above end phenomenon.
This was a major point that was being missed-that one was trying to produce
something. If you don't know what you're trying to produce it can take
forever, can't it?
PREREQUISITE
There is one factor that would effectively block a smooth run through
this training, basics or no basics. You're not going to get a person who
has been loaded up with drugs to grasp this data and come out the other end
as any kind of product until he's had his drugs handled.
You now have the Purification Rundown to handle that, along with
Objectives and the Drug Rundown. With this fantastic new rundown, which is
an undercut to all training and processing, we have the means to make even
the seemingly untrainable trainable.
SUMMARY
I wanted to let you know what has been happening in regard to TRs study
and training over the past year, and what bugs have now been uncovered.
Each of the points taken up in this bulletin have now been solved. You will
have a very complete professional TRs Course released in book form in the
near future.
Meantime, the materials exist and are available on which to train
students in TRs and do so very effectively.
Therefore, this issue is your license to include on any current
checksheet which calls for auditor TRs the materials and actions covered
herein.
The data is being given you for your immediate use.
So I'll expect to see you turning out crops of auditors with flawless
TRs!
It can be accomplished by getting in the five points covered in this
bulletin alone.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 DECEMBER 1979
Remimeo
HOW TO BUILD A SAUNA
Refs: HCOB 6 Feb 78RA THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN
Rev. 4.12.79 REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM
HCOB 6 Feb 78RA-1 HE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN-
Addition of 20.12.79 ERRATA AND ADDITIONS
ANYONE BUILDING A SAUNA SHOULD BE WARNED THAT
IT HAS TO BE PROPERLY BUILT SO AS NOT TO CAUSE
INJURY OR CASUALTY TO PERSONS USING IT.
The Purification Rundown is not only the initial necessary preliminary
undercut to the majority of cases planet-wide, but orgs will find it in
great popular demand in the immediate future as news of its remarkable
results have already spread rapidly through word-of-mouth.
Every org must be able to deliver the Purification Rundown. In order to
deliver the rundown an org will need the use of a sauna, and in order to
deliver it most efficiently an org would have its own sauna.
The major part of the 5-hour daily period on the Purification Rundown
is spent in the sauna bath, after working up the circulation by a period of
running.
Thus, if the sauna bath is situated right on the org premises or
adjoining or very close to the org premises, and operated under the org's
jurisdiction, it will not only be more convenient and more workable but
more economical as well.
This issue is written to provide the basic data on how an org can equip
itself to deliver the rundown most ideally-via its own sauna bath.
SAUNA: DEFINITION OF
The word "SAUNA" is a Finnish word which describes the Finnish custom
of bathing or deep cleansing by intense heat which induces perspiration.
Technically, the term "sauna bath" refers to a specially constructed
wooden room, properly insulated, and heated to temperatures of between 140�
and 200�F (or approximately 71� to 93�C) to induce profuse sweating.
It is equipped with wooden benches at different height levels on which
the bathers sit or recline. As heat rises, the air is hotter around the
higher benches and somewhat cooler around the lower benches, so one can
take his choice, depending upon his heat tolerance.
The sauna room is also, necessarily, equipped with its own heat source.
BUILDING A SAUNA
In building a sauna, the two main factors to be taken into
consideration are: (a) location of the sauna room and (b) the type of heat
source to be used.
The choice of location of the room can depend upon what type of heat is
available and most economical, and the location of the main source of heat.
With these two factors determined, one can then get into the other
aspects of sauna installation which include size of the room, foundation
and flooring, wiring, walls, ventilation, insulation, exterior finishes,
safety measures and any accessories needed.
COST ANALYSIS: Before undertaking the building of a sauna, all of the
following data will need to be taken into consideration and a cost analysis
must be done, based on building codes and local prices and accessibility of
materials and equipment.
In other words, cost analysis and planning is done first so that all
the aspects of an effective, operational sauna are considered and provided
for in advance. A properly targetted construction program can then be
carried out rapidly.
In the PAC area a very workable sauna was constructed for approximately
$1600 -$1200 of which was for construction and construction materials, $400
of which was for sauna unit heaters. With good planning, it is possible for
any org to equip itself with a standard sauna room, vital to the delivery
of the Purification Rundown. Its construction and maintenance should then
more than pay for itself as the rundown is sold and delivered.
BUILDING CODES AND PERMITS: It will be necessary to check with your
building department to determine what permits are needed for sauna
installation, and what the local building codes require in the way of
structural design and construction materials. Most building codes in the
United States set standards similar to or based on those of the Uniform
Building Code and the National Electric Code for foundations, framing and
wiring.
Zoning laws may enter into it. However, as you will not be in the
business of operating a commercial sauna and as many home owners and even
business executives now install their own private home or office saunas,
there should be no difficulty in obtaining the necessary permit for
installation.
Building codes and building permit requirements must be complied with,
for both safety and legal reasons. It would be foolish for an org to
endanger its tenancy of a building by any infraction of such regulations.
LOCATION OF THE SAUNA: A sauna room can be built inside another room. In
other words, one could use a fairly small room for this purpose by
insulating and paneling it properly, or one could partition off a part of a
large room, with proper wall construction, insulation and interior
finishing.
An ideal selection for a sauna would be a room with a drain in the
floor or one where a drain could be easily installed. It should be located
near a shower (which may also need to be installed), as cooling showers may
be necessary for a large majority of people during the hours of sweat out.
In any case, a nearby source of running water is a must, as sweaters should
drink plenty of water to prevent dehydration and this must be easily
available. It is also needed for convenience in taking salt or potassium
gluconate tablets and vitamins.
Ideally, two showers and two locker rooms, one each for men and women,
would be located conveniently near the sauna.
Depending upon the type of heat to be used, it may be advantageous to
select a room fairly close to the heat source to prevent the necessity for
extensive additional wiring or piping. For example, if steam heat is used,
the closer the room is to the steam furnace or boiler the better, as steam
pipes, all well and properly insulated, would need to be run from the heat
source to the sauna steam heaters. The more such piping is
needed the greater the cost, naturally, and there is also the additional
factor of it taking longer to get the steam actually coming through to the
sauna heaters.
Choosing a room with the least outside wall or window surface is also
desirable.
This is due to the fact that the more outside wall surface there is
involved, the more insulation and heat is required to maintain proper sauna
room temperatures.
It may be necessary to select the sauna room according to local
building code and permit regulations.
Where an org simply does not have the space for building a sauna right
on the org premises, it may be necessary to rent or purchase additional
space in a nearby or adjoining building for the installation of its sauna.
SIZE OF SAUNA ROOM: A sauna room must not be too large, for the sake of
economy. Too large a room is too expensive and too difficult to heat.
An org. however, will want a sauna room that can accommodate between 10
and 15 people at once, as the traffic will require it. Some suggested sizes
are: 12 x 10 x 7 feet; 14 x 14 x 7 feet; or 12 x 16 x 9 feet. The height of
the room is never more than 9 feet, and most often 7 feet is best, as a
high ceiling simply results in loss of heat, because heat rises. Thus a low
ceiling prevents the heat from rising into space where it won't be used.
The size of the room should be determined by the number of people you
expect to be using it at any one time. It is usual to allow 65 cubic feet
of space for each person.
A rectangular or square-shaped room provides the optimum shape space
for arrangement of the tiered benches.
It should be kept in mind that the size and power of the sauna stove
required to heat the room will depend directly upon the size of the room.
SOURCES OF HEAT
By far the biggest single factor to be taken into consideration in
installing a sauna is the source of heat to be used.
The types of sauna stoves available are:
1. Gas
2. Electric
3. Wood burning (which would not be practical for an org), and
4. Steam heaters can also be used, where the org has a year-round
supply of steam, such as would be routinely supplied for dish-
washers, laundry or hot water heating. Otherwise, where steam is
used only for central heating of the building, it would be far too
expensive to run a steam boiler in the summer for sauna use only.
Additionally, there would be heat loss, even with shut-offs to
different areas. In a large building, however, where steam is
required all the time for other purposes, steam would probably be
the most economical. Or, it might be practical to purchase a small
steam generator for sauna heating purposes only.
The choice of the type of heater to be used should be determined by the
most economical heat available to the org. Cost comparisons should be made
locally to determine installation costs and operating costs of different
heating systems.
ELECTRIC STOVES: Electric sauna stoves are by far the easiest to install
and the cleanest. They are efficient but they may not be the most
economical to operate, depending upon the cost of electricity in the area.
With an electric stove, you will need at least a 220 volt supply of
electrical power to the sauna. This is the same voltage that operates a
kitchen stove or a clothes dryer, but it must be determined that the
existing power supply in the org can safely support the additional power
required for the sauna heater. If not, you may need to install an
additional power supply.
The size of the stove is important-it must be the correct size, power-
wise, to produce the required sauna temperatures. The size will depend upon
the size of the room and the location of the room. Less power, for example,
would be required for a small room or a room with no outside wall exposure.
The power of an electric stove is measured by the number of kilowatts
needed to heat the stove elements. One kilowatt (kw) = 1000 watts.
Prefabricated electric sauna stoves come anywhere from 2.2 kilowatts to 18
kilowatts in power.
To compute the size electric stove needed, allow I kilowatt for every
45 cubic feet of room space.
Find the number of cubic feet of room space by multiplying the length
by the width by the height of the room. This gives you the total cubic
feet, or volume. of the room.
Divide the volume by 45 to get the number of kilowatts needed to heat
that room.
Example: The volume of a 12 x 10 x 7 foot room = 840 cubic feet.
840 = 18.44 kilowatts
45
18.44 kilowatts is the power required to heat a 12 x 10 x 7 foot room
to proper sauna temperatures.
The above is the formula that would be used in temperate climates. In a
colder climate, a stronger stove would probably be required.
Prefabricated electric sauna stoves have a control unit that is always
installed outside the sauna room, as the controls are not built to
withstand high temperatures. These stoves usually also include a safety
device that cuts off the electrical current should there be a malfunction
of any kind.
GAS STOVES: The power of a gas stove is measured by the number of British
Thermal Units (BTUs) of heat the stove generates. (A British Thermal Unit
is the amount of heat necessary to raise I pound of water I degree
Fahrenheit.) Gas heaters are graded according to the number of BTUs they
provide in one hour.
To compute the size gas stove required, allow 1000 BTUs for every 15
cubic feet of sauna room volume.
Example: The volume of a 12 x 10 x 7 foot room = 840 cubic feet.
840 cubic feet divided by 15 cubic feet ((81450)) = 56.
Multiply 56 x 1000 BTUs = 56,000 BTUs needed from a gas heater to heat
a 12 x 10 x 7 foot sauna room.
Gas heaters usually cost less to operate than electric heaters. They
are a bit more complicated (but not necessarily more expensive) to install.
The heater would need to be connected to the building's gas supply line by
approved gas piping. Standard
approved galvanized steel pipe with threaded ends and standard galvanized
steel fittings for any bends (elbows) in the pipe, with approved thread
sealout, would be required. Such piping would need to be done
professionally, possibly contracted, or inspected professionally when
completed.
Old gas heaters, however well-renovated they might be, are not
permitted for this purpose. Modern gas heaters for sauna use are built with
special safety shut-off valves and safety pilot flame, designed to cut the
gas supply off should the pilot light go out. If an org is to use gas heat
in the sauna, on/v a modern gas heater with these safety features is
permissible for org installation.
With a modern gas heater, the gas is piped in to a small burner in a
sealed combustion chamber in the stove. Air is drawn into the chamber from
outside the sauna and expelled through the flue.
Gas heaters, especially, require an adequate air supply and suitable
venting.
SOAP BUBBLE TEST FOR LEAKS IN GAS LINES: The following test can be done to
detect leaks in a gas pipe line, particularly at the elbow joints or any
place where two pieces of pipe are spliced together with threaded ends. Mix
I part liquid detergent with 4 parts water, in a cup or can.
Pressurize the line by opening the gas line valve. With a soft brush,
mix up the soap solution and daub it well around any joints of pipe. If
there is the slightest leak, it will show up in big soap bubbles. If any
such leaks are found, the pipe connections would need to be redone, and
then thoroughly reinspected.
Both gas and electric prefabricated sauna stoves are metal-encased,
usually with two or even three layers of noncorrosive metal with air
between them. The outermost layer of metal, which is usually of stainless
steel or baked enamel, prevents the surface from becoming too hot and
inhibits the loss of heat from the front and sides of the stove. Both the
gas and electric type stoves are thermostatically controlled.
SAUNA STONES
Prefabricated sauna stoves are designed with a metal tray at the top to
hold and heat a pile of stones or rocks called konno rocks. Konno rocks,
technically known as peridotite maim, are quarried in Finland. They are
ideal for the sauna as they store heat well, help to distribute a soft heat
evenly throughout the sauna room and help to maintain the required sauna
temperature. Another virtue of these stones is that they can withstand high
temperatures and do not crack or explode when subjected to high heat
pressure.
To allow for good air circulation, the stones should be loosely packed
in the tray. If one wishes to add steam to the sauna, a long-handled ladle
is used to pour water on the hot stones, resulting in bursts of steam which
fill the sauna room.
A supply of konno rocks or stones is usually included with the purchase
of a prefabricated sauna stove. The stones will usually last through five
years of routine use. They may also be purchased separately, commercially.
WOOD BURNING STOVES: Although the wood burning stove is in the best Finnish
sauna tradition, it is highly impractical for org use. It takes a good
quantity of wood to heat a sauna adequately and routine stoking would be
required, as well as a convenient storage space for the wood supply.
Further, the cost of wood as fuel can be high, and there is a wide variance
in the heat-producing qualities of different woods. It takes considerable
time to heat a sauna room to the required temperature with a wood burning
stove, and the ashes from a wood fire must be removed periodically.
For all of the above reasons, a wood burning sauna stove is not
recommended.
STEAM HEATERS: Where steam is available the year round, steam "unit
heaters" can be used, as was done in the sauna built in PAC, and this is
probably the most economical method of heating the sauna.
A unit heater is a combination heater and fan, so arranged that the fan
blows air through the heater, thus speeding the transfer of heat from the
heater to the room air.
Steam unit heaters are rated according to the number of BTUs they will
produce when supplied with 60 degree F. entering air and 2 pounds per
square inch steam pressure. As entering air becomes hotter, the heater puts
out fewer BTUs. But by increasing the steam pressure to the unit heater you
can increase the amount of BTUs it puts out. Check the steam capacity of
the unit (which is probably 150 pounds per square inch). By adjusting the
pressure reduction valve and so admitting more or less steam pressure to
the unit heater, you can raise or lower the temperature of the sauna. A
safety valve is used to protect the unit heater in the event that the
pressure reduction valve should fail (though this is quite unusual). One
should insist on clear instructions on how to mount any safety valve that
is purchased.
Actually, the unit heater can be heated by electricity, gas, steam or
hot water. An electric unit heater is the easiest to install (depending
upon the existing voltage supply, as described earlier) but an electric
heater will use around 1/3 of a watt to put out one BTU per hour. To heat a
room 14 x 14 x 9 feet high, this would require upwards of 18,000 watts per
hour which, depending upon the geographical location, can be quite an
expensive operation.
Hot water heaters require high water temperatures, around 180 degrees
F. minimum. Gas or oil heaters, depending upon local availability of fuel,
can be fairly inexpensive to purchase and use, but they require sufficient
air supply and the proper venting to be safe.
REMEMBER THAT ANY COMBUSTION INCLUDING ELECTRICAL COMBUSTION CONSUMES
OXYGEN AND AS OXYGEN DIMINISHES IT WILL GIVE OFF CARBON MONOXIDE, WHICH IS
QUITE A DEADLY POISON.
Perhaps your best bet, from the standpoint of safety and economy, would
be a small steam generator, external to the sauna and well vented,
providing steam to a unit heater in the sauna.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEAM FITTINGS: If steam is used, the following
specifications might be used as a guide in the selection of steam fittings:
For Steam Piping, maximum pressure 150 pounds per square inch, use
standard weight black steel pipe, ASTM A53 or A-120, Grade A or B. Use
screwed fittings of 150 pound black malleable iron. Use unions of 250
pound malleable iron, ground iron to bronze seat. Use RP 8 C shut-off
valves, 30 ITF, bronze body ball types with Teflon seats. For pressure
reduction valves and safety valves use C.M. Bailey.
For Condensate Return. use seamless copper tubing, drawn temper, ASTM
B88, Type "L," fittings of wrought copper solder joint ASA B16 22;
unions wrought copper screwed Nibco No. 633; shut-off valves Nibco-
Scott S-595-Y bronze body, solder end, ball type with teflon seats;
check valves Nibco Y-type brass body screwed. Solder, Easy Flo or
equivalent with melting point higher than 1000 degrees F., suitable
flux.
The basic hook-up is: steam main to higher elbow (for drainage), to
shut-off valve, to strainer, to union, to pressure reduction valve, to
union, to shut-off valve, to safety valve, to elbow, down to union, to
elbow, to unit heater. From unit heater to scale pocket (a short capped
length of vertical pipe same size as exit hole from unit heater into which
scale from the heater can fall), to union, to strainer, to "Float &
Thermostatic Trap," to shut-off valve, to check valve, to elbow, to
condensate return pipe.
Again, the foregoing should be considered a guide only, as installation
instructions for your heating system should be available from the
manufacturer.
The unit heaters described above, whether heated by steam, gas,
electricity or hot water, provide a dry heat sauna of a less sophisticated
type than the specially designed prefabricated gas or electric sauna
stoves.
You will need to check the various systems and costs with your local
dealer to determine the most suitable sauna heater for your area.
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAUNA
FOUNDATION AND FLOORING: The floor of the room you are converting into a
sauna serves as the foundation.
If it's a concrete floor, all you would then need to do would be to add
wooden slats, in a duckboard construction. Duckboards are easy to remove
for cleaning purposes. Or you could cover the floor with ceramic tile.
If the original floor is wood, the handling would be to install a wood
frame, made of 2 by 4 sleepers, add some good thermal insulating material
(not fiberglass), and put down a subfloor of plywood over that, The plywood
floor could then be covered with ceramic tile or seamless sheet vinyl, for
waterproofing.
Only waterproof adhesives would be used. Ideally the floor would be
slightly sloped toward a drain, as it will need to be scrubbed down
routinely to be kept clean.
FRAMING: The first walls put up can be sheets of sheet rock.
The room is then framed with 2 x 4 studs, spaced to permit insertion of
3-inch thick insulation batts. The studs are nailed to the wooden 2 x 4
sleepers below the subfloor. If the floor is concrete they are attached
with anchor bolts or concrete nails. The studs may be 16 or 24 inches
apart, according to building codes.
The ceiling, lowered to 7 or 9 feet, is constructed exactly as the
walls are, with the rafters spaced for insertion of insulation batts.
NOTE: At this point, although the wall construction is not yet complete,
any needed holes for conduits for electricity or other heat should be
drilled in the sheet rock and studs.
INSULATION: Good insulation is important in a sauna, as-it helps retain the
heat and keeps the cost of heating down. The best insulation is expanded
polyurethene. The insulation batts, 3 inches thick, come in strips, with
flanges which can be stapled (do not use glue) to the framing studs. The 3-
inch thick part of the insulation batt is inserted between the studs.
FINISHING OF THE WALLS: With the insulation installed, a vapor barrier (of
construction plastic) is then nailed or stapled to the studs. The vapor
barrier prevents moisture from collecting inside the walls.
The same insulation and vapor barrier is also installed in the ceiling.
Walls and ceiling are then covered with one-half inch gypsum board.
For the final covering, walls and ceiling are paneled with saw textured
l-inch by 6-inch wood paneling, with the smooth face exposed inside the
sauna. Kiln-dried redwood is commonly used for such paneling, where it is
easily available. This and cedar are especially popular because of their
high insulation factor. They make the sauna easier to heat and remain
cooler to the touch. Other low-density softwoods which
resist heat can also be used, such as white pine, sugar pine, ponderosa
pine, spruce and hemlock.
Care should be taken to select finished, vertical-grain woods, as free
of knotholes and resin pockets as possible. Any knotholes or resin pockets
must be placed near the floor, never on the ceiling or high on the walls,
as the melting resin could drip and burn the bathers.
Any nails or staples used in the construction should be of rust-
resistant, hotdipped galvanized finish.
VENTILATION: The sauna needs to be properly ventilated to provide enough
oxygen, a free flow of air and an escape for the bad air, while still
retaining the room heat. Poor ventilation in the sauna can cause dizziness
or even asphyxiation.
Building requirements usually call for a vent area of 1/20 the floor
area, but not less than 1 1/2 square feet, but this must be checked with
your building department.
The intake vent is located near the floor and can be approximately a
1/2-inch slit under the door. The outlet vent would be on the opposite
wall, near the ceiling, and could be a vent of about 4 inches in diameter.
With this arrangement, the good air is pulled in low in the room and can
circulate, while the bad air leaves through the vent near the ceiling. It
is a good idea to provide a slide cover for the outlet vent so it can be
adjusted to control the amount of air leaving the room.
WIRING: Any wiring to be done will have to meet very strict electrical
standards for complete safety. The installation of wiring and electrical
circuits to handle an electric stove (should your sauna have one), control
panel, thermostat and lighting for the room, will probably be required to
be done professionally. In a sauna wiring must be used that can hold up
under 200 degree F. or higher temperatures and also withstand moisture.
Also, the wiring must be located in the dry areas behind the insulation.
All switches and controls are installed outside the sauna, as these do not
withstand high heat.
SAUNA DOOR: The recommended door is a solid-core Philippine mahogany slab
door. This is not a true mahogany and should not be too costly. It should
be solidly mounted with 4 hinges and not too tight in the frame, as it will
expand slightly, (or shrink), with changes in temperature.
When a solid core door is used, you would also add a frame, insulation
and paneling to it.
CAUTION: Sauna doors should always open out and must never be fitted with
any type of latch that could get caught or stuck and lock you in. Ball or
roller catches are probably best for this purpose. There is never an
outside lock installed on the door.
Wooden handles must be used on the door, never metal as it becomes too
hot to touch.
One should avoid using any metal frames or hardware in the sauna
wherever possible, for the same reason. Any metal fasteners or lighting
fixtures which must be used should be noncorrosive and placed well away
from where bathers could touch or brush against them accidentally, as they
could cause burns.
SAUNA BENCHES: The sauna benches are preferably made of redwood, 2 x 2 and
2 x 4, as other materials can leak hot pitch or give off toxic fumes when
heated.
Bench sizes vary but the best approximate size is about 15 3/4 inches
wide, 32 inches high with an 8 inch step. Benches are installed in tiers at
various levels in the room. The lower benches should be a bit wider than
the upper ones to provide room for people's feet.
Benches can be located on three sides of the room, but would never be
placed against the wall where the stove is located.
ADDITIONAL SAFETY MEASURES: Whatever the choice of a sauna stove, it must
be mounted according to building department regulations, whatever distance
from the wall is required and with whatever type wall insulation behind it
that is required.
A wooden railing is placed around the front and sides of the stove for
bathers' protection.
ACCESSORIES: You will need a thermometer that reads at least up to 200
degrees Fahrenheit, and you will probably want to install a clock in the
sauna. These accessories should be of the type that are manufactured for
sauna use.
CURING THE SAUNA: Curing the sauna means preparing it for its first use.
When your sauna is complete, sweep down and vacuum all walls, ceilings,
floor, benches, corners. Next wipe all walls, ceiling, benches, fixtures,
stove, accessories, etc. with a damp cloth and warm water. With the sauna
door propped open, turn the heater on for about half an hour. (The stove
may smoke a bit if it is burning off its protective coating.) Finally,
close the sauna door, bring the room temperature up to 200 degrees F. for
about 5 or 6 hours. Your sauna will then be ready for use.
HYGIENE: The sauna must be scrubbed down routinely to keep it sanitary and
free from perspiration odors. Any duckboards on the floor should be removed
and scrubbed and then replaced. It is also a good idea to routinely fully
ventilate the room, particularly after heavy use, so wood surfaces can be
given a chance to dry.
HOW TO TAKE A SAUNA: Before going into the sauna, all jewelry,
wristwatches, eye glasses or contact lenses should be removed, as these
could become uncomfortably hot or be damaged by the heat.
It is best to shower briefly with warm water just before going into the
sauna and after the running period which has brought up the circulation.
The period of sweat out in the sauna would then be followed by another
cleansing shower.
In an org sauna, used by all, swim wear (not too tight-fitting) or
loose shorts and a tank top, for women, would be worn. Ideally, an org
would have two saunas for its public, one for men and one for women. The
same dress could be worn in this case, if preferred, or the bather could
simply sauna in a large towel.
Complete, prefabricated saunas are available on the market, and
possibly these should be priced, but an org in any area will probably find
it more economical to build its own.
With careful planning and costing, economical use of materials, but
without stinting on safety measures, a very workable, pleasant sauna can be
built for the org's use in delivering the Purification Rundown.
As saunas are becoming more popular by the day, there are numerous
reference books or magazines which can be found in the library or on
newsstands which would give you further data on saunas.
Two of these are:
HOW TO BUILD A SAUNA. by Carlton Hollander, a Drake Publication of
Sterling Publishing Co., Inc.. New York.
HOT TUBS. SPAS & HOME SAUNAS. by the Editors of Sunset Books, Lane
Publishing Co., Menlo Park, California.
And the 3-volume HEATING. VENTILATION & AIR CONDITIONING. by James E.
Brumbaugh, published by Theodore Audel & Co., a division of Howard W.
Sams & Co.. Inc., 4300 West 62nd Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268"
(catalog 23227) will provide valuable data on routine heating and
determining heat requirements.
With the issue of this bulletin as a guide, each org should now get
busy and acquire its own sauna in very short order-to be able to deliver
the Purification Rundown !
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
As assisted by
Captain William B.
Robertson
George Smith
and
Mats Markowicz
who piloted this
construction in the
PAC area.
LRH:WBR:GS:MM:dr
Copyright � 1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
SUBJECT INDEX
1978-1979
agree(ment)(s),
A agreed upon out-ethics, 223
group agreement in an out-ethics
course room, 223
A=A=A is the way most people handle data, 326 alcohol,
aberration(s), aberrate(d), compulsion to still drink,
lessening of, 23
making others wrong, the most universally present
definition, 74
aberration, 307 high TA on alcohol case, 22
no humanoid is free while aberrated in the body cycle,
is included as a drug and receives the same treatment
12 in auditing, 74
one would have to de-aberrate a man before his whole
pc not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol
social structure could be de-aberrated, 12
history, 75
aberree vs. Clear on the meter, 1 pc who has drunk
alcohol, handling, 65
ability, abilities, prior assessment and, 22
cycle of deterioration of ability to confront, 311
reason person took up drugs or, 22, 311
evaluating for pc by asking what his abilities are in
resistive case and, 75
relation to his mental image pictures, 338
somatic shut-off due to, 22
inability to think with data, reason for, 368
taking heavy drugs and alcohol because he had with increasing
the ability of individuals and the human holds and
could not confront, 311
race, 374 Vitamin B1 vs., 171
judging oneself by one s successes breeds confidence Alice
in Wonderland, 305
in one s ability, 15 "All Blend" oil, 169
why ability to get things done in an area dwindles, 330
allergy, allergies,
Academy, Hard TRs Course as an Academy prerequisite, run
out by niacin, 173
418 to a certain antibiotic, handling, 159
accidents, handling person who has, 415 to antibiotics or
other medicines, 74
accusative or challenging attitude, 353 alter~ing~,
aches, standard C/S for, 33 altering the content of HCOBs or
P/Ls, 318
acknowledge(ment)(s); see also TR 2 crime to alter and
pervert tech or procedure to prevent
confession and, 225, 227 discovery of
withholds, 303
giving pc an appropriate acknowledgement on his win,
altitude, handling absence of, 412
258 amends project, 384
unacknowledged Dianetic Clears, recognition of, 243,
anarchy, war only brings, 14
256 anemic, Purification Rundown and, 167, 177
working only to be thanked or admired, 15 Angel Dust,
action(s), can lodge in the tissues, 165
indicating an unnecessary action, 81 developed by
crooked gamblers. 267
low TA caused by incomplete actions, 149, 152 LSD
and Angel Dust are the worst, 74
major actions; see major actions remaining in the body,
267
most important single auditing actions an auditor can
animal, fact which disproved that Man was an, 211
do, 189 answer(s)(ed),
offline case actions forbidden, 432 getting one
auditing question answered before you ask
subjective vs. objective questions or actions, 432
a second question, 248
action, cycle of; see cycle of action pc volunteers some
answer to an unreading prepared
additives, curing him of his additives, complexities, apa-
list question, handling, 71
thy and apparent stupidity on a subject, 370
antagonism, antagonistic; see also hostilities
administration, definition, 298
auditor admin; see auditor admin good roads, good
weather approach to the antagonistic
orders; see orders terminal, 290
responsibilities of leaders, 11 how pc goes the effect
of the antagonistic terminal, 276
seven things about power, 19 others antagonistic to
what pc is doing, handling, 63
admire(d), pc connected to someone hostile or antagonistic to
one is what one is, not what one is admired or hated
Scientology, handling, 63
for, 15 sending a copy of What Is Scientology?
to antagonistic
working only to be thanked or admired, 15
person, 291
advance; see case gain Suppressed Person RD handling of an
antagonistic
Advanced Organization(s), terminal, 276
always bring your own folder or get it sent to the AO if
antibiotics,
you are going, 272 administering of, 156
services given at, 272 allergy to, 74, 159
set-ups and, 272 blood leveling time and, 156
Solo Auditors Course and, 272 definition, 156
where they are located. 272 disease cycles vs., 159
advertising, false data and, 368 getting the temperature
subnormal with, 156
AESPs, Int RD and, 104,199 given too irregularly, 157
affinity, intestinal bacteria and, 161
definition, 296 not enough, 157
importance of knowing how A and R and C interrelate,
oral antibiotics, side effects of, 159
436 penicillin, 160
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
antibiotics (cont.) assess(ment)(s),
penicillin taken orally, 160 asking pc not to say a
word throughout the, 2
side effects, 159 Auditing by Lists procedure, 70
stopped too soon, 157 auditor s assessment is dull or
monotonous, handling
sulfadrugs. 159 306
temperature and, 157 bad metering giving wrong
assessments, 194
toxicity, 157 call prepared list questions without
looking at the pc,
virus diseases respond badly to, 156 70
Vitamin B1 and, 161 do not take up things that don t
read, 71
vitamins given before session to person on, 158
F/Ning assessment on C/S 53, procedure, 221
what antibiotics are effective against, 156 F/Ning
prepared lists, 144, 254
wrongkind, 157 F/N packs up during assessment of
prepared list,
yoghurt and, 161 handling, 254
antithesis, definition, 369 getting a suppressed read by not
being able to read
AO; see Advanced Organization through an F/N, 145
apathy, curing him of his additives, complexities. apathy
Joburg assessment procedure, 3
and apparent stupidity on a subject, 370
maximum time between questions, 2
application, applying, Method 3; see Method 3
exact application depends on complete understanding.
Method 5; see Method 5
376 mistaking an F/N right swing for a read,
149,152
how standard tech slips down to some of the tech
nulling and F/Ning prepared lists, 144
being applied when we can, 223 Prehav Scale
assessment procedure, 2
how you get auditors who misapply tech, 223 prior
assessment; see prior assessment
inability to learn and apply, handling, 374 reading
through an F/N, 145, 254
person backing off from applying data he is studying
Resistive Cases Assessment, 30, 60
despite standard Word Clearing, handling, 371
slow assessments, reason for, 2
person must be at cause when he is expected to apply
statement (in assessing) can be accusative or evalua
knowledge or skills, 379 tive, 419
producing causative, responsible graduates who can
twinning on such actions as assessment drilling, 379
apply what they have learned, 382 why
assessments are wrong sometimes, 1
when he can t seem to apply what he has learned,
assignment, auditor-pc assignment policies, 431
suspect false data, 368 atmospheric poisons, 164
when person comes to apply the tech, he is already able
attest(s)(ed); see also declare
to outflow if he was trained using twinning, 379
attempting to attest to Dianetic Clear in order to save
ARC, money or for status reasons, 256
books with chapters on, 434, 436 Dianetic Clear
attests, 243
importance of knowing how A and R and C interrelate,
Dianetic Clear attests-additional data, 256
436 letting pc attest to a state he achieved,
258
triangle; see ARC triangle person has attested to
Dianetic Clear but hasn t made
TRs and, 435, 436 it, handling, 257
ARC break(s); see also rudiments person wanting to attest to
Dianetic Clear but clearly
ARC broke meter that won t record a read, 7 hasn
t made it, handling, 257
audited over ARC break, handling, 61 suppressive act
to send pc through to attest to Dianetic
auditing over ARC break, effect of, 220 Clear
when he hasn t truly made it, 244
definition, 297 who can send pc through to attest to
Dianetic Clear,
L1C used for, 70 244
only ARC breaks will worsen a case, 276 attitude(s),
persisting ARC breaks, handling, 69 auditor attitude
and TRs during a Confessional, 250
ARC break long duration, Feel Sad equals, 148, 152
challenging or accusative attitude, 353
ARC broke meter with Bls vs, free needle, 7 drugs changing
the attitude of a person, 164
ARC triangle, attraction, what obsessive attraction is based on,
93
communication formula and, 435 audience, what separates a
member of the audience from
improving each point of the, 436 a professional,
346
TRs and, 435 audit(ed)(ing),
TRs Course and, 434 actions; see actions
use of, 436 ARC break, effect of auditing over an,
220
art, audited over exterior, symptoms of, 32
art in its basics, 326 auditing past exterior, effects
of, 34, 43, 98
fine arts vs, illustrations, 331 auditor-pc assignment
policies, 431
how the distance between amateured junk and an effec-
becoming inactive as a Scientologist due to being au
tive product is accomplished, 326 dited
past Dianetic Clear, 243
professionals and, 326, 346 bringing the person up to
the level where he is now
why we follow the rules, 326 ready for
processing, 179
as-is(ness); see also blowing; erasure by lists; see Auditing
by Lists
bringing about an as-isness, 228 cannot audit over
anything else if Int or L & N are out,
how to get any unwanted persisting thing to vanish,
334
228 can't audit a case on anything if Int is
out, 220
that which is viewed in its own time, place, form and
Confessional done for justice reasons is not auditing,
event can be as-ised, 228 246
truth and, 228 consistently not making the expected
gains from his
aspirin, do not audit a pc who has taken, 27
processing, 166
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
audit(ed)(ing) (cont,) audit(ed)(ing) (cont,)
C/S-1 isn t auditing, 100 why you cannot run anything
not charged (reading),
Data Series auditing, 56 190
delivery; see delivery why you run what reacts on the
meter, 1, 253
discoveries and advancements in tech in 1978, 266
withhold, effect of auditing over a, 220
doesn't want auditing, handling, 60 Auditing by List(s),
do not try to fly ruds or word clear over out-Int or out-
pc volunteers some answer to an unreading question,
lists, 423 71
don t audit things that don t read, 42 procedure, 70
errors; see errors auditing room, auditor seated closer
to the door, 246
general rule of, 228 auditor(s),
getting one auditing question answered before you ask
assigning only good proven auditors to good auditors,
a second question, 248 431
getting processing cheaply, 271 assignment policies,
431
has not had auditing, handling, 64 attitude and TRs
during a Confessional, 250
hours; see hours audited pc past exterior, correcting
the auditor, 100
how fast and thorough NED is, 265 backing off from
having to F/N a list, reason, 146, 255
how to get any unwanted persisting thing to vanish, 228
building pc's confidence in the, 250
how uncharged areas are run and charged ones are by
the skill of his auditors you know the C/S, 106
missed, 155, 254 cannot make a prepared list read,
handling, 145
husband/wife teams, possible reason they often fail,
can't F/N a C/S 53, handling, 222
242 can't get results without TRs, 420
intensive; see intensive can't smoothly audit Int
RD, handling, 106
major actions; see major actions communication formula
done in clay, 433-435
mental actions do not work in the presence of drugs,
C/S must be very sure auditors are fully checked out
164 on things they are to run before
running them, 106
misunderstoods caused pc trouble in auditing, hand-
Dianetic auditors; see Dianetic auditors
ling, 69 errors; see errors
misunderstoods in auditing, handling, 69 evidence
that auditor's eyesight is bad, 145
most important single auditing actions an auditor can
failing auditors, handling, 309
do, 189 flubbing auditors, handling, 52
must be very limited if a list is out, 220 getting an
honest TRs tape passed by competent au
must not be continued over an unhandled PTS situa-
thority before he audits anybody, 302
tion, 290 good auditor gets case gain on a pc on
his TRs and
no auditor may audit in an HGC who has not done a
comm cycle alone, 420
Hard TRs Course, 302 good auditor is never
distractive to a pc, 419
offline case actions forbidden, 432 Group Auditors
Handbook, description, 325
OTs are easier and faster to handle than non-OTs, 432
handling fixed, uncontrolled or unsuitable tone levels
out-lnt, do not audit over, 190,192, 217, 220, 334
in an, 305
out-lists and, 220, 334 Hard TRs and, 433
out-tech to try to audit or rehab in an interview, 333
Hard TRs make an auditor, 436
overwhelmed by auditing, handling, 62 has more control
over pc s reactive mind than the pc, 2
pc has been audited in an earlier life, handling, 64
how you get auditors who misapply tech, fail to handle
pc not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol
their pcs' ethics, give and accept verbal data, have
history, 75 nonstandard admin, etc,
etc, 223
persistent F/N in auditing, handling, 277, 280
mechanical sounding auditor, handling, 306
power of, 244 missing a withhold, what it stems
from, 242
preparing the majority of pcs for making optimum
missingwithholds, penaltyfor, 242
case gain, 164 mood of auditor fixed or chronic,
effects of, 305
prices; see prices most important single auditing
actions an auditor can
problem, effect of auditing over a, 220 do,
189
processing or study under the duress of suppression
must be checked out and drilled on new materials, 52
will not produce results, 290 no auditor
may audit in an HGC who has not done a
processing results attained on person who has been on
Hard TRs Course, 302
heavy drugs vs, non-drug person, 165 no
auditor may audit materials or apply HCOBs on
protesting auditing, 61 which he has not been
starrated, 52
Purification Rundown is not a substitute for, 164 no
read auditors, reasons for, 145
Purification Rundown is not done concurrently with,
not required to "drill TRs" in the morning or evening
167 as TRs do not fall out, 309
purpose of, 253 offline case actions forbidden, 432
reactivity, auditing is aimed at, 253 once an auditor
s TRs are in, they are in, 418
refusing auditing, handling, 61 once an auditor s TRs
are 'IN ' they don t go out, 302
rough auditing, handling, 264, 335 out-ethics and,
224
subjective vs, objective questions or actions, 432 pc
dislikes talking to an auditor, handling, 61
undercut to all training and processing, 437 pc had
trouble understanding an auditor, handling, 69
unreading flows or items are not run, 253 placing
his meter in the wrong position, 145
what happens if you only run the end of incidents, 44
rabbiting, cause of, 145
what really happens to a thetan who is not salvaged or
requirements before being allowed to do any two-way
processed and goes on down the route, 275
comm, 104
why the person has to learn to audit himself on OT
requirements to deliver Dianetic Clear Special Inten
auditing, 272 sive, 344
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
auditor(s) (cont,) biochemistry and fluid balance of the body
probably dis requirements to do Confessionals, 246
arranged by drugs, 165
requirements to do Date/Locate, 374 Biolactyl, 161
requirements to do Int RD, 99,100,189 biophyslcal,
definition, 164
requirements to do Int RD correction, 80 biophysical
processes, 165
seated closer to the door, 246 birth, interiorization and,
44
session and social presence of a professional auditor, BIs;
see bad indicators
437 blame, still stuck in the shame, blame and regret
of the
TRs are out, handling, 302 unconfessed overt or
withhold, handling, 227
TRs Course before correcting other auditor or admin
blank(ness),
errors, 309 drug case and blank periods, 74
TRs should sound live and interested and natural, 305
misunderstood words and, 366
uneducated pcs require flawless topnotch auditors, 101
person can go blank after he passes a word or symbol
unusual solutions and, 6 he doesn t understand,
130
which ones not to let near an Int pc, 197 blink(ing),
who can handle anyone with communication alone,
blinklessTR0, definition,419
437 TRs and, 419
why auditors of lower case level aren t assigned to pre-
blood, running to get the blood circulating, 167
OTs, 431 blood leveling, definition, 156
why the C/S can't be the auditor supervisor and pc blood
pressure, Purification Rundown and, 167,177
interviewer, 7 blow(s)(ing) (as-ising mass); see also
as-is; erasure
why the individual practitioner breaks down, 7 a
blow (in dating) is accompanied by a BD and F/N,
auditor admin, 230
Auditing by List procedure and admin, 70 Date to
Blow-Locate to Blow steps, 81
auditors who have nonstandard admin, how you get
definition, 82, 229
them, 223 how the earliest session blows the
later sessions, 58
prepared list remains in the folder stapled to the work-
no blow on pc giving the date or auditor meter dating
sheet, 70 it, handling, 231
reads, TA action, BDs and needle behavior noted blow(s),
blown (departures),
clearly in the worksheets, 335 auditing past
exterior as a cause of, 34
Word Clearing worksheets, contents and handling of,
blown student is recovered by his twin, 381, 382
140 handling blown students and pcs with C/S 53,
220
Auditor Rundown, what it handles, 270 if one twin should
blow, the other twin must go and
Auditor's Code, get him, 381
continuing a process that has ceased to produce change
missing a withhold and, 388
is a crime, 5 M/W/Hs and, 242
dirty needle caused by breaking the, 10 overts as
a cause of, 34
False Data Stripping and, 374 blowdown,
"automatic," moods or emotions are usually, 305 blow (in
dating) is accompanied by a BD and F/N, 230
aware, becoming more aware on the Purification Run-
marking what TA it blew down to, 220
down, 176 Board Technical Bulletin(s),
axiom(s), cancellation of destructive BTBs and BPLs on TRs,
Axiom 30, 228 417
Axiom 38 excerpt, 228 issuing issues in BTB or BPL form
that contain incor rect and
misleading data, 303
body,
B all people have some fatty
tissue, 170
biochemistry and fluid balance probably
disarranged
by drugs, 165
backtrack; see whole track cleaning up the fat tissue in
the, 170
bad indicators, free needle vs, 7 drug deposits inside cells,
170
balance, 74, 159 drugs can lodge in the tissues, 165
bank; see reactive mind drugs staying in the body and
releasing themselves now
basic has to be run for the chain or incident to erase, 44
and then, 221
basics, endocrine system and minerals, 174
art in its basics, 326 exchanging good oil for bad fat
in the, 170
TRs basics resurrected, 433 flushing poisons and
chemical substances out of the,
TRs vs, out-basics, 434 168
BD; see blowdown holding onto something it is short of, 170
be, SPs deny be and enforce unwanted be, 127 LSD lodging in
the tissues, 165
being(s); see also case; individual; Man; preclear; thetan
LSD or Angel Dust remaining in the, 267
death slide as a, 311 niacin breaks up and unleashes
LSD, marijuana and
fixed or stuck in a chronic mood, 305 other
drugs and poisons from the tissues and cells,
half dead as a, 311 172
beliefs, handling pc who has held Eastern beliefs, 66 no
humanoid is free while aberrated in the body cycle,
betterment; see case gain 12
bio, definition, 164 no such thing as a fat cell, 169
biochemical, nutritional deficiencies created by toxins
and drugs, 171
definition, 164 pc currently doing body practices,
handling, 66
restoring the biochemical balance of the body, 179 pc
has body parts missing, handling, 64
biochemical substances, pc has had body parts removed,
handling, 64
can prevent case gain, 163, 165 pc has physically
damaged parts, handling, 64
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
body (cont,)
proof that the individual is not a, 44, 211
C
reason we are handling drugs and drug deposits in the,
165 calcium
reconstructing itself from the damage done by drugs
creating a deficiency in C by administering B and
and other biochemical substances, 179
calcium, 174
removal of life-hostile chemical substances from the,
deficiencyof, 174
166 has to have an acidic base to operate in,
174
replenishing body fluids, 168 healing and, 174
restoring the biochemical balance of the, 179
ineffective and inactive in an alkaline system, 175
standard C/S for body aches, 33 magnesium and, 174
tissues; see tissues nervous system and, 174
toxic substances in the body causing restimulation,
spasmsand, 174
166 teeth problems due to Vitamin B1 taken
without cal
toxic substances tend to lock up mainly in the fat tis-
cium, 175
sue, 169 toxicsubstancesand, 174
TRs and reactive body motions, 419 vinegar and, 175
weight changes on the Purification Rundown, 170 calcium
gluconate, 175
bog(s), Cal-Mag,
handling bogged students and their twins, 383
formula, 175
primary reasons for case bogs, 189 making it
correctly vs, making it incorrectly, 175
Bolivar, Simon, 11 Purification Rundown dosage, 171
bonded by HCO before given access to confidential Dia- ratio
of magnesium to calcium, 175
netic Clear HCOBs, 344 sore muscles prevented
with, 175
B1; seeVitamin B1 stays good for 2 days, 175
bones, pc has broken bones, handling, 63 Vitamin B1
balanced out by, 175
bonuses, when a C/S would have to refund them, 304 what it is
and what it does, 174
books, only source of technical data is LRH HCOBs, can(s),
electrode(s),
books and tapes, 417 can fiddle can fake or
upset reads, 70
BPC; see bypassed charge fiddling with cans, how to stop
it, 249
brain, drug damage to the, 178 obtaining maximum skin
contact, 314
bravery, having the bravery needed to trust inferior minds
obtaining the correct can size, 314
and stand by their often shocking blunders, 15 can
squeeze,
break(s), session break(s), convulsive or incorrect can
squeeze, effects of, 154
Int RD and, 41 E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze, 312
physical PTP and, 41 how an incorrect can squeeze
gives an inaccurate,
students taking unscheduled breaks, 224
unreliable needle reaction, 312
breakthroughs in tech in 1978, 265 how it can be done
incorrectly, 312
Bridge, how to determine the sensitivity setting,
312
not moving up the Bridge but remaining parked at how
to get a pc to do an accurate can squeeze, 312
some point due to being audited past Dianetic Clear,
incorrect can squeeze, examples, 313
243 noting accurately the distance the needle
fell, 315
pc not continuing up the Bridge on his grades, 166
procedure for setting sensitivity, 319
Bright Think Rundown HCOBs withdrawn, 260 sensitivity is
set for 1/3 of a dial drop on a correct can
BTB; see Board Technical Bulletin squeeze, 4, 9, 70,
155, 312, 315, 316, 320
Buddhism, Int RD solves the total goal of, 42 what a
correct can squeeze is, 314
bugged, "can't have," definition, 94, 126
areas where staff aren t studying regularly are, in most
Can We Ever Be Friends?, use in PTS handling, 291
cases, the bugged and nonproducing areas, 428
carbon pot vs, wire wound pot, 323
definition, 400 case(s); see also being; preclear; thetan
Businessman's Intensive, what it handles, 270 appearing
to be no case gain, out-ethics case due to
button(s), being audited past Dianetic Clear, 243
ensure nothing was suppressed, invalidated or mis-
becoming inactive as a Scientologist due to being
understood before leaving an unreading item, flow
audited past Dianetic Clear, 243
or question, 253 bogs, primary reasons for, 189
Int button read on an MU, handling, 79 drug case; see
drug case
Int buttons list, 46,193 drug, medicine and alcohol
cases, 22
Int buttons must be assessed before clearing, 103 drug
personality, 164
Int buttons, no reads on, 79 gain; see case gain
Invalidate button; see Invalidate button getting an
estimate of a, 261
Misunderstood Words button; see Misunderstood
harboring hostilitiesand hatreds, 164
Words button manifesting PTSness and illnesses
due to being audited
Protest; see protest past Dianetic Clear, 243
putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood most
thorough way to set up a, 264
Words on the prepared list, 145 no case gain;
see case gain
rabbitbuttons, 145 not making it in auditing, check
for drug or alcohol
Suppress button; see Suppress button history,
75
bypassed charge, not moving up the Bridge but remaining
parked at
changing process while TA shows good motion will
some point due to being audited past Dianetic Clear,
leave pc with, 319 243
on improperly done or unnecessary prepared lists or
offline case actions forbidden, 432
repair actions, handling, 214 only a PTP will
halt the progress of a, 276
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
case(s) (cont,) case supervising, case supervision, C/Sing (cont,)
PTS RD remedies case conditions not previously reme-
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive, C/Sing of, 335, 336
died, 92 Dianetic Clear state unacknowledged,
recognition and
resistive case; see resistive case handling
of, 256
Resistive Cases Assessment, 30, 60 Dianetic Clear,
who can send pc through to attest to,
rundown that undercuts every case, 164 244
still appears resistive after GF, handling, 261
Dianetic pc who has had drug handling omitted, hand suppressed
physical condition and person on drugs, ling, 75
drink or medicine, 22 Dianetics is its own field
of C/Sing, 55
untangling a, 261 discomfort, standard C/S for, 33
case analysis, C/S 53 and, 221 don t need a C/S to fly
somebody s ruds, 422
case gain, gain(s), getting an estimate of a case, 261
appearing to be no case gain, out-ethics case due to
had Qual corrective actions and has gotten worse or
being audited past Dianetic Clear, 243 made
no improvement, handling, 423
audit over a problem and pc won t make case gain, 220
headaches, standard C/S for, 33
biochemical substances vs, 163 heavy pressures,
standard C/S for, 33
drugs can prevent it, 165 high TA, standard C/S for,
33
drugs vs, 163,164,165,166 Int Correction Lists have
been done and pc still has
EXGF 40RD and no change case, 92 headaches or
other Int troubles, 100, 104
GF or EXGF 40RD handles no or slow case gain, 262
interiorization, when to order a check on it, 39
good auditor gets case gain on a pc on his TRs and Int
RD C/Sing, 104
comm cycle alone, 420 Int RD error is corrected
as a first action, 98
how suppression results in no gain or deterioration of
Int RD, if reading, is done before review auditing, ruds
a case, 276 or anything else, 42
if pc s case is improving he becomes more independent
Int session bogged, handling, 217
of the meter, 229 Int troubles persisting,
100,104
only a PTP will halt the progress of a case, 276
mental actions do not work in the presence of drugs,
only ARC breaks will worsen a case, 276 164
OTs make very fast and spectacular gains, 432 never
let a prepared list not read and not F/N without
pc consistently not making the expected gains from
findingwhat it is all about, 145
his processing, 166 no or slow case gain
handled by GF or EXGF 40RD,
pc not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol
262
history, 75 no read auditors, reasons for,
145
pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS, 90 offline
case actions forbidden, 432
permissive TRs vs, 436 OTs are easier and faster to
handle than non-OTs, 432
poor case gain due to unacknowledged state of Dia- out-
Int despite having had Int RD and it has been re
neticClear, 256 paired, handling, 190
preparing the majority of pcs for making optimum out-
lnt, handling, 190
case gain, 164 out-Int, must not audit pc on
anything else if Int is out,
PTS RD EP is a pc who is getting and keeping case
190, 217, 220
gains and never again roller-coasters, 292
overrepaired pcs, usual cause of, 255
Purification RD and, 164 pc continuously not making
the expected gains from
running Dianetics on a Dianetic Clear gives semblance
his processing, 166
of no case gain, 268 pc exteriorizes in session
but hasn t had an Int RD,
slow gain, handling, 270 handling, 38, 80, 99,
105
why SP s case doesn t improve, 8 pc not continuing up
the Bridge on his grades, 166
case level, why auditors of lower case level aren t assigned
pc not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol
to pre-OTs, 431 history, 75
case supervising, case supervision, C/Sing, points a C/S
should always look for in repairing cases,
audited past Dianetic Clear, manifestations of, 243
38
auditing must be very limited if a list is out, 220
preparing the majority of pcs for making optimum
auditor back-off or protest on F/Ning a list, cause of,
case gain, 164
146 programming; see programming
auditor cannot make a prepared list read, reasons, 145
PTS RD which does not work, handling, 124
auditor can't F/N a C/S 53, handling, 222
Purification Rundown and, 166, 177
auditor-pc assignment policies, 431 Purification
Rundown is for anyone, 164
biophysical processes do not work in the presence of
Quad Dianetics C/Sing, 53, 55
drugs, 165 repair; see repair
body aches, standard C/S for, 33 set-ups; see set-ups
bringing the person up to the level where he is now
still some other BPC or Bls after Crashing Mis-U
ready for processing, 179 Repair List
done, handling, 357
case bogs, primary reasons for, 189 unreading flows
or items are not run, 253
case still appears resistive after GF, handling, 261
unreading prepared list, handling, 164
Confessional worksheets, primary thing to inspect, 249
untangling a case, 261
correcting any adverse reaction to the Power to For-
unusual solutions, cause of, 7
give Proclamation, 227 Case Supervisor(s),
C/S Checklist of Int Errors, 217 assessing GF Method 5
and sending to C/S for pro
C/Sing for a level for which he has not been trained,
gramming, 261
penalties for, 304 bonuses, deprivation of,
304
Dianetic Clear, adjudication and declare of the state
by the skill of his auditors you know the C/S, 106
of, 200 calling in suspected Dianetic Clears
for confirmation,
Dianetic Clear, programming for his next step, 252
257
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Case Supervisor(s) (cont,) charge(d) (cont,)
C/S Checklist of Int Errors, 217 protesty because Int
has been run or repaired when it
C/Sing for a level for which he has not been trained,
wasn t charged, 191
penalties for, 304 read means there is charge
present and available to
definition, 270 run, 253
doing the training and cramming because there is no
reality and, 37
Qual Staff Training Officer or Cramming, 106
things that don t read won t run, 37
High Crime checkouts and, 375 what charge shows, 37
Ivory Tower and, 7, 258 why you cannot run anything
not charged (reading), 191
must be very sure auditors are fully checked out on
why you run what reacts on the meter, 1, 253
things they are to run before running them, 106
checklist(s),
Purification Rundown and, 177 C/S Checklist of Int
Errors, 217
Purification Rundown is always done under C/S super-
Debug Tech Checklist, 408
vision, 167 How to Defeat Verbal Tech
Checklist, 402
qualifications, 304 checkout(s), starrate checkout(s),
requirements to deliver Dianetic Clear Special Inten-
auditors must be checked out and drilled on new
sive, 344 materials, 52
unusual solutions and, 7 C/S must be very sure
auditors are fully checked out
where nearly all a C/S s hard work comes from, 104
on things they are to run before running them, 106
who can send pc through to attest to Dianetic Clear,
correct way to do a starrate checkout, 103
244 double flunk defined, 382
who doesn t get high or low TAs handled at once, False
Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W
handling, 100 handling, and service
facsimile tech must be em
why the C/S can't be the auditor supervisor and pc
ployed where needed in checkouts, 375
interviewer, 7 giving tough standard checkouts,
381
wins, how to have them as a C/S, 106 High Crime
checkouts and Word Clearing, 375
cause, causative, if a student flunks a Supervisor
checkout on materials
person must be at cause when he is expected to apply
he s been passed on by his twin, both students get a
knowledge or skills, 379 flunk, 382
producing causative, responsible graduates who can Int
RD and, 103, 206
apply what they have learned, 382 no auditor
may audit materials or apply HCOBs on
putting the PTS person at cause over his situation,
which he has not been starrated, 52
290, 296 turn-about system applied to, 380
training at cause vs, training at effect, 379
checksheets must exist for staff courses, 427
cell(s), chemical(s),
drug deposits inside cells, 170 chemical oriented
society, 164
niacin breaks up and unleashes LSD, marijuana and
definition, 164
other drugs and poisons from the tissues and cells,
flushing poisons and chemical substances out of the
172 body, 168
certificate(s), certified, removal of life-hostile chemical
substances from the
certificate expiration if the person has not done the
body, 166
internship for the level he is certified for, 309
chemists, belief that all life came from matter, 165
special certificate for those trained to administer Con-
chicken and egg problem, 128
fessional procedure, 225 "children should be seen
and not heard, -false data, 368
student may not be certified and may not be given a
chronic somatics, PTS RD handles, 92
course completion until he had completed his twin,
circulation,
381 LSD cuts off circulation, 165
suspension of certificates for missing a withhold, 242
running increases the, 167
suspensionofcertificateuntilauditorisretreaded,52
running to work up circulation prior to going into
chain(s); see also engram running; Routine 3RA
sauna, 180
basic has to be run for the chain or incident to erase,
civilization; see culture
44 Class IV audltor, Int RD is done by a, 206
do not end Int RD session with a chain partially run, Class
IV Orgs, definition, 269
40 Class VI Org, how the Saint Hill Orgs came about
and
sickness caused by engram chains, 24 what
services they give, 271
what happens if you only run incidents late on the, 44 Class
VIII Course, standard tech and, 272
what has to be run for a chain or incident to erase, 212
Class IX Course, what materials it contains, 272
word chains, handling, 183 clay demonstratlon(s),
challenging or accusative attitude, 353 communication formula
done in clay, 433-435
change, Int RD materials and, 103, 206
Change the Civilization Eval, 307 references, 103
continuing a process that has ceased to produee change "clay
table," handling the extensively mistrained glib
is a crime, 5 student with, 132
pc anxious about change, handling, 69 Clay Table audlting,
auditor and Cramming assignment
change of characteristic, policies, 431
what a change of characteristic question is, 321 Clay Table
De-PTSing,
when it is followed up, 323 for a person who is PTS and
dramatizing creating
when it occurs, 320 problems, 390
charge(d), who can do it, 405
how uncharged areas are run and charged ones are clean,
missed, 155, 254 do not leave prepared list
questions merely clean, 71
I never run a pc on things that aren't charged, 253
That's clean or That reads is not said to pc, 70
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Clear(s); see also Dianetic Clear, cognition(s) (cont,)
aberree vs, Clear on the meter, 1 feeding or coaxing a,
200
a very few thetans have never been anything but Clear,
F/N and, 7, 9
328 when a pc is cogniting, look at the meter
not the pc, 7
can be achieved on Dianetics, 200 cold, Vitamin C and, 161
comm-evable offense to coach pc with data about Clear comm;
see communication
in any way, 244 command(s), all Dianetics commands are
used, 54
comm-evable offense to feed or coax pc to any cogni-
Committee of Evidence; see also penalties
tion to make a, 200 Confessional for person
refusing to come clean on a,
C/S 53 reads and, 221 246
Date/Locate on the point he went Clear, 244 for
coaching pc with data about Clear, 244
definition of DianeticClear, 200 for continued omission
or refusal to get or support
Dianetic Clear is a, 200 actions to get juniors
hatted and trained, 428
Dianetics not run on, 191, 198 for feeding or coaxing
a pc to any cognition to make
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List and, 187
a Clear, 200
Expanded Green Form 40RD and, 262 for missing a
withhold, 242
failing to declare one who has made it is actionable,
offenses Course Supervisor may be comm-eved for, 224
328 communicate, communication(s), comm,
Green Formand, 262 being who can handle anyone with
communication
has drugs reading on C/S 53, handling, 221
alone, 437
has not had Int RD but Int reads on C/S 53, handling,
communication grade is out, handling, 69
220 conceptual understanding and, 425
how fast we are making them, 266 definition, 296
in last life, 243 formula; see communication
formula
Int RD and, 32, 43, 79, 191,197, 212 importance of
knowing how A and R and C interrelate,
Int Rundown Correction List Revised and, 84 436
inval/eval and the state of Clear, 244 inability to
communicate, handling, 412
Keyed-Out Clear, there is no such thing as, 200 lack
of the ability to communicate probably underlies
L3RF reads and, 144, 221 the causes for the
current drug culture, 130
New Grade IV and, 270 out of communication due to Mis-
Us, 130
out-lnt and, 213 putting him back into communication
with his fellow
overrun on the Clearing Course, 256 man, his
family and the world at large, 250
pc goes Clear on a grade, handling, 252 that can
stand up faultlessly to any session or social
postulates of a Clear read as a surge, 257
situation no matter how rough, 437
processes a Clear wouldn t respond to, 256 the true
data on TRs and, 434
PTS RD and, 91, 291 TRs course brings about ability
to, 307
someone who has not made Clear will not make it on
twinning puts students into communication, into
the OT levels, 200 doingness and
participation, 378
unhandled drugs on a Clear, handling, 262 two-way
comm; see two-way communication
unresolving Int problems and, 32 when words are
understood, communication can'take
went Clear before doing the Clearing Course, 256
place, 184
Clear cog, Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment
communication cycle,
List and, 339, 343 cycle of action and cycle
of communication, 348
clearing, good auditor gets case gain on a pc on his TRs and
biochemical substances vs, 163 comm cycle
alone, 420
drugs vs, 163 Mis-U interrupts cycle of
communication or under
one would have to de-aberrate a man before his whole
standing, 348
social structure could be de-aberrated, 12 TRs
and, 142, 433
what success in clearing this planet depends upon, 224
communication formula,
clearing commands, ARC triangle and, 434
Confessionals and, 246 definition, 297
pc very upset and words of the Repair Correction List
doing it in clay, 433-435
have not yet been cleared, handling, 214 how
to learn the, 435
Clearing Course, TRs and, 435
Dianetic Clears and, 252, 272 TRs are drills on the
various parts of the, 435
for those who did not make Dianetic Clear, 272 TRs
Course and, 434
went Clear before doing the, 256 communication lag, poor or
comm lag TR 2 in a Con
coach(s)(ing), fessional, effects of, 250
based on producing the EP not based on opinion, 437
competence,
giving tough standard coaching sessions, 381 morale is
up when competence is demonstrated, 381
job of the coach and Supervisor is to make the student
reduced by false data, 374
right, 143 completion,
Mood Drills, coach s patter, 305 handling all the
factors that prevent the completion
TRs and, 143, 418, 419, 436 of cycles of action
and products, 330
TRs coached to wins, not losses, 436 high and genuine
course completions, 385
co-audit, definition, 269 plummeting HGC Completion
Statistic, 5
codeine, 165 student may not be certified and may not be
given a
cognition(s), course completion until he has
completed his twin,
Clear cog and Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assess-
381
ment List, 339, 343 complexity, complexities,
do not interrupt pc's cognition, 192 curing him of
his additives, complexities, apathy and
don t be engrossed in looking at the pc during, 9
apparent stupidity on a subject, 370
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
complexity, complexities (cont,) Confessional(s) (cont,)
Man is a complex being, 274 statement of forgiveness
used at the end of a, 225
misunderstoods and, 329 still stuck in the shame,
blame and regret of the un
complicate a subject, why a person has a tendency to, 311
confessed overt or withhold, handling, 227
conceptual understanding, 133,183, 425 thought of one overt,
but told a different overt, 227
Confessional(s); see also Security Check tick is always
noted, 246
acknowledging the confession, 225, 227 trouble,
handling, 248
adverse reaction to proclamation of forgiveness, hand-
TRs rough or choppy make pc feel accused, 250
ling, 227 unreading questions, handling, 247
auditor and Cramming assignment policies, 431 what
a Confessional clears up, 245
auditor attitude and TRs during, 250 worksheets,
routing of, 249
auditor requirements, 246 confidence,
auditors who miss withholds, penalty, 242 as a NED
auditor, 210
bad Exam Report after, handling, 250 how to build pc
s confidence in the auditor, 250
clear the words backwards, 246 judging oneself by one
s successes breeds confidence
command for earlier similar, 248 in one s
ability, 15
commands for Suppress and Invalidate buttons, 247
confront(ing); see also TR 0
commands to periodically check for M/W/H, 248
confront tech has to be part of the TR checksheet, 311
confessing one s overt acts is the first step toward taking
cycle of deterioration of ability to confront, 311
responsibility for them, 225 excessive
blinking on TR 0, 419
C/Sing data, 249 how ability to confront is lessened,
311
dirty needles are followed up fully, 247 inability
to confront, cause of, 311
do not take up unreading questions, 247
manifestations that show that a person is not confront
don't take a rise as a change of characteristic, 247
ing, 418
errors that cause an incomplete confession, 227 not
confronting and duplicating in an area due to mis
ethics presence and, 242, 250 understoods, 330
every reading question is F/Ned, 246 person cannot be
drilled into confronting, handling,
falls on his head after a Confessional, handling, 249
311
false read, handling, 247 taking heavy drugs and
alcohol because he had with
false read, indicators of, 247 holds and could
not confront, 311
F/Ning the original question, 246, 247, 248 the less a
person can confront, the more false data he
forgiveness and, 225 has accumulated and will
accumulate, 370
for person refusing to come clean on a Comm Ev,
TRsCoursebringsaboutabilityto, 307
B of 1, etc, 246 withholds causing inability
to, 311
helping person end cycle on the bad things he has
confusion(s),
done, 225 misunderstoods and, 329
high or low TA at start, handling, 246 MUs and
confusions obscuring the Crashing MU,
if any trouble, check for M/W/Hs, false reads and
handling, 387
ARC breaks, in that order, 248 consequences
starting to take on a new meaning during
if pc not in session you won t get the withholds, 250
Purification Rundown, 176
indicator that something has been missed, 227 context,
how to clear a word when you don t know the,
is auditing and is kept confidential if not done for
183
justice reasons, 246 continuous overt(s),
is not a rote procedure, 247 committing continuous
overts in life, handling, 63
is not auditing if done for justice reasons, 246
continuously committing overts on Scientology, hand
LCRC, when to use it, 248, 249 ling, 63
low responsibility causing person to F/N, 247 control,
auditor has more control over pc s reactive mind
misdirections of the pc indicate he is withholding, 247
than the pc, 2
Now I m supposed to's, 245 correction lists; see
prepared lists
pc consistently immediately dives whole track on Con- cost;
see price
fessional questions, handling, 248 couldn't have,
definition, 94, 126
pc gives three or four overts at once, handling, 247
counter-, definition, 298
permits person to again feel a part of his group, 246
counter-Intention, handling, 415
person not being able to accept forgiveness or still
country, how to bring about a great political reform or
feeling bad, handling, 227 improve a
failing country, 12
poor or comm lag TR 2, effects of, 250 course(s); see also
study; training
power to forgive, 225, 227, 249 application; see
application
power to forgive proclamation patter, 225, 249
completions; see completions
procedure, 245 courses Class IV Orgs teach, 271
purpose of, 225 Dianetics Course; see Dianetics Course
reads and, 246 eating or smoking in course room not
allowed, 224
rechecking the original question, 248 expanding
courses, how to get, 427
references, 245 failures because twinning had fallen
into misuse or
religion and, 225 fallen out completely, 377
repair list, when to use it, 248, 249 Flag courses,
274
R-Factor given to person, 246 group agreement in an
out-ethics course room, 223
rock slams, reporting and noting of, 248 how a
student or Supervisor goes into agreement with
ruds at the end of a, 249 and contributes to an
out-ethics course room, 223
Sec Checking, Integrity Processing and Confessionals
how long it takes when I teach a, 307
are all the same procedure, 245 ideal scene of,
223
special certificate for those trained to administer Con-
incomplete course is not allowed by Supervisors, 385
fessional procedure, 225 in-ethics course
defined, 223
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
course(s) (cont,) Course Supervisor(s) (cont,)
items required in a standard course room, 427 why
the C/S can't be the auditor supervisor and pc
keeping the course morale high, 382
interviewer, 7
late for course, 384 Court of Ethics,
mandatory twinning on all practical courses, 377 for
using verbal tech, 318
mustering students, 224 SSO empowered to call an
Executive Court of Ethics,
new TRs Course at the beginning of major courses, 309
428
not getting students through their course and gradu-
cramming; see also errors
ated, penalty for, 224 actions which are not
OK and which are OK to do in
offenses Course Supervisor may be comm-eved for, 224
Cramming, 431
one is responsible for getting his twin through the, 381
assignment policies, 431
out-ethics course defined, 223 audited pc past
exterior, correcting the auditor, 100
permitting persons to come into the course room and
auditor cannot make a prepared list read, reasons, 145
bother students for any reason is not allowed, 224
auditor can't F/N a C/S 53, handling, 222
prices; see prices checking an auditor's TRs, 418
reduction in course costs, 269 crammed over out-ruds
in the past, handling, 422
running it with totally standard tech and in-ethics, 223
C/S doing the training and cramming because there
Solo Auditors Course, 272 is no Qual Staff
Training Officer or Cramming, 106
SSO responsibility for standard staff courses, 426 C/S
who doesn't get high or low TAs handled at once,
staff courses; see staff courses handling, 100
student may not be certified and may not be given a
don't need a C/S to fly somebody's ruds, 422
course completion until he has completed his twin,
failing auditors ordered to do a complete modern TRs
381 Course, 309
Supervisor checks up on any students who have been
flying ruds in, 421
routed off course, 385 folder check before,
423
TRs Course; see TRs Course gotten worse or made no
improvement after cramming,
twinning on practical courses, 378 handling,
423
twinning on practical sections of courses, 379
handling bogged students and their twins, 384
twinning reinstated, 377 High Crime checkouts and,
376
two ways a course can be run, 223 Method 9 Word Clearing
and, 376
when to twin, 379 natter about, 421
course supervision, no read auditors, 145
based on producing the EP not based on opinion, 437
offline case actions forbidden, 432
TRs the Hard Way, supervision of, 436 OTs are easier
and faster to handle than non-OTs, 432
Course Supervlsor(s), out-ruds and, 421
answers to students' questions, 382 protest of, 421
assigning twins, 379, 382 remedy for auditors who
make errors on the PTS RD,
checks up on any students who have been routed off
124
course, 385 resistance to, 421
directs students with questions to the correct source
subjective vs, objective questions or actions, 432
reference, 427 TRs Course as the only acceptable
first cramming
"double flunk" given by the, 382 order, 309
Drug RD and Grade IV are prerequisites for, 309 TRs
Course before correcting other auditor or admin
duties of the Staff Course Supervisor, 427
errors, 309
failure of a twin to be a twin, handling, 382 what
the most usual and successful cramming action
High Crime checkouts and, 375 is, 432
how he goes into agreement with and contributes to an
when to retread an auditor, 52
out-ethics course room, 223 worksheets are put in
pc folder and sent to C/S, 422
incomplete course is not allowed by, 385 Cramming
Offlcer,
job of the coach and Supervisor is to make the student
assignment policies, 431
right, 143 correction lists he must get checked
out on the use of,
keeping the course morale high, 382 422
letting students study without dictionaries and demo
must get checked out on flying ruds and overts, 422
kits, 224 policy not to assign non-OT Cramming
Officers to
not fully applying study tech and using Word Clearing,
OTs, 431
224 qualifications of, 422
not getting students through their course and gradu-
Crashing Misunderstood(s); see also misunderstood word
ated, penalty for, 224 all methods of W/Cing
utilized in Crashing Mis-U
not making all materials available, 224
finding, 349
offenses he may be comm-eved for, 224 ask for
instances of practical usage from the person
producing causative, responsible graduates who can
you found a Crashing Mis-U on, 352
apply what they have learned, 382 blocks to
finding them, 386
responsibility to enforce twinning, 382 bog or
trouble during Crashing Mis-U finding, 357
roll book and, 427 cannot be found at all yet it
obviously must be there,
staff courses, putting them there, 426 handling,
350
Staff Course Supervisor, 427 can't find a useful
definition, handling, 354
standing around or sitting at his desk not actively
case histories to show how Crashing Mis-U finding
handling students who need help, penalty for, 224
goes, 353
Teacher or Supervisor Intensive, what it does, 270
cautions for Crashing Mis-U finding, 356
teaming up students of comparable case level and
cleared to F/N VGIs, 353
training and abilities, 378 clear this word fully
to VGIs (on the meter it would
verbal data and, 382 F/N), 349
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Crashing Misunderstood(s) (cont,) Crashing Misunderstood(s) (cont,)
commands for finding the, 349, 353 procedure for
finding, 348
commands for pulling O/Ws, 350, 388 product and,
386, 387
command to handle service facsimile that is getting in
pulling withholds in nonmetered Crashing Mis-U find
the way of finding the, 389 ing, 350, 388,
390
cycle of action and, 347, 386, 387 Reach and
Withdraw run after finding the, 350
cycle of understanding and, 348 red tagged exam,
handling, 357
debugging products with Crashing Mis-U tech, 348
references, 330, 361, 387
debug tech and, 352 remedies for inability to locate
the, 389
defense mechanism which would make it impossible to
resistance to finding the Mis-U, examples of, 350
find the, 351 results, how to get them every
time, 390
definition, 347, 360, 387 service facsimiles and, 389
detecting if he's got it and if he hasn't got it cleared
shattered civilizations and, 348
up, 352 still not getting out his products or
completing cycles
dynamics and, 360 of action in his area after
Crashing Mis-U finding,
effects of, 356 handling, 357
elusive or Crashing Mis-U, 361 supposing everyone
else has the same Crashing Mis-U,
EP of Crashing Mis-U finding, 350, 352 356
example of using a meter to find a, 352 theory,
348
example sof how to find a, 353 totally blocks
person's understanding of the subject,
false data burying a Crashing MU, handling, 388
387
false data handled with two-way comm, 354 24-hour
repair rule for bogged Crashing Mis-U find
False Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W
ing, 356
handling and service facsimile tech must be em-
unmetered Crashing Mis-U finding, example, 355
ployed where needed in checkouts, 375 using the
read to steer him to the area and find the
finding Crashing Mis-Us is not a substitute for full
Mis-U, 353
W/Cing, 347 utilize all methods of W/Cing and
whatever else it
getting off the track and clearing up a whole subject
takes to find the, 362
that has nothing to do with getting out his product,
what Crashing MUs can be buried by, 386, 390
356 will not always show up for what it is in
M9ing, 361
handling, 387 Word Clearer's first action is to
himself look up the
having to do Method 2 and Method 4 on certain mate-
definition and derivation of the word, 351
rials before the Crashing MU can'then be located,
you've done full Crashing Mis-U and product debug
387 procedure and still haven't
gotten the Crashing
how Crashing Mis-U finding differs from regular
Mis-U, handling 361
W/Cing, 349 Crashing Mis-U Repair List (LC1),
how it may not even read on the meter, 361 form, 357
how you can'tell someone has a, 356 Method 3 or
Method 5 used, 357
importance of the Word Clearer knowing the correct still
some other BPC or BIs after Crashing Mis-U Re definition
of the word, 351 pair List done, handling, 357
is not your ordinary common garden variety of Mis-U,
use of, 357
361 creating,
is straight on the subject-line that is giving trouble, 387
area or individual creating problems and demanding
it must be found, no matter how arduous the search,
solutions to them, handling, 405
386 engaged in creating problems, 347
justifications and, 388 person PTS and dramatizing
creating problems during
key to completed cycles of action and products, 347
Crashing MU finding, 390
manifestation of a withhold in addition to a, 356 crlme,
drugs and, 164
marry up routine M9 with Crashing Mis-U finding and
crlmes In Sclentology,
all of its steps where the person isn't making it
changingorlosingissues, 303
otherwise, 362 continuing a process that has
ceased to produce change
may be right there in plain view, 361 is a, 5
may not be on the subject of the product itself but in
failing to report an unusual sohltion advised or used, 6
an area related to the subject, 362 issuing
issues in BTB or BPL form that contain incor
meter check after pulling withholds in nonmetered
rect or misleading data, 303
Crashing Mis-U finding, 351, 388 posting known
criminals or incompetents to training
metered and nonmetered Crashing Mis-U finding, 348
posts, 303
MUs and confusions obscuring the Crashing MU,
references, 303
handling, 387 suppressive acts, examples of,
303
no Crashing Mis-Us can be found on a subject yet it
technical perversions, 303
is obvious they exist, handling, 371, 386, 387
unusual solutions and, 5
other MUs vs, 387 verbal tech, 303
overtproductsand,351 criminal, posting known criminals or
incompetents to
overts and withholds getting in the way of find the, 387
training posts, 303
O/W handling in metered and nonmetered Crashing critical,
M/W/H and, 248
MU finding, 387 CRMU; see Crashing Misunderstood
O/W phenomenon during Crashing Mis-U finding, 350 C/S; see
case supervision; Case Supervisor
O/W pulling during Crashing Mis-U finding, 350, 388 C/S
Checklist of Int Errors, 217
person giving reasons why it is OK not to understand C/S
53,
the subject or area, handling, 388 as next
action after Int RD or End of Endless Int RD,
person PTS and dramatizing creating problems during
197
Crashing MU finding, 390 assessing it and
indicating the largest read, 220
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
C/S 53 (cont,) cycle of action,
auditor can't F/N a C/S 53, handling, 222 completed
cycle of action normally results in a prod
blown students and pcs handled with, 220 uct,
347
case analysis and, 221 Crashing Mis-U and, 347, 386, 387
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 221 cycle of
communication and, 348
contains all the elements known to us that bring about
debugging a, 408
case foul-ups, 221 definition, 347
contains everything that can be wrong with a mind,
disease cycles of action, 159
220, 264, 270 handling all the factors that
prevent the completion of,
determining whether Int is out, 190 330
drugs reading on a Clear, OT, or Dianetic Clear,
insane person and, 404
handling, 221 key to completed cycles of action
and products, 347
"Endless C/S 53s," 222 major reason people don't
complete cycles of action,
false TA pc and, 222 347
F/Ning a, 221, 264 Mis-U and, 329, 347, 348
form (long), 150 SP and, 404
form (short), 147 still not getting out his
products or completing cycles
if high or low TA persists use LIX Hi-Lo TA List Re-
of action in his area after Crashing Mis-U finding,
vised, 107 handling, 357
instant F/Ns not taken up, 220 won't complete a cycle
of action, handling, 413
Int reads, handling, 190, 220 cycle of communication; see
communication cycle
LIX Hi-Lo TA List Revised vs, 107 cycle of understanding,
Crashing Mis-U and, 348
long form vs, short form, 147, 150, 220
major actions and, 264
Method 5 and, 147, 150, 220, 221
D
object of the, 220
order in which reads are taken up, 149, 150, 153, 220 daily
reports, Purification Rundown and, 177
pcs bugged by C/S 53s being done on them, handling, data;
see datum
222 Data Serles,
pc who does not require a C/S 53 to F/Ning list, 264
handling a student who cannot grasp or retain the data
primary purpose of, 221 of the, 56
programming and handling reads, 220 HC Out-Point-
Plus-Point Lists cancelled, 56
rough auditing handled with, 335 date(s), dating,
set-up before major action must include C/S 53RL to
calling the date found back to the pc, 83, 231
F/Ning list, 264 Date to Blow-Locate to Blow
steps, 81
set-ups and, 264 definition of dating, 228
short form questions are less limited, 220 implant
dates vs, actual dates, 230
2WCing the C/S 53 itself, 222 locating and, 228
two ways of using a, 220 pc can be made more
dependent or more independent
uneducated pcs and, 220 of the meter, 229
use of, 147,150, 220 purpose of, 230
using it in a D of P interview, 221 theory of, 228
verifying that you actually have a read on Int, 190
use the system of time measurement that the pc uses,
why it is written the way it is, 220 230
C/S-1; see Dianetic C/S-1; PTS C/S-1 why you date and
locate, 228
culture(s), civilization(s), society; see also Man wrong date
for an incident, handling, 228
Change the Civilization Eval, 307 Date/Locate,
chemical oriented society, 164 accept the pc's data,
231
First Dynamic world, 383 auditor must not go past a
blow, 233
how to bring about a great political reform or improve
auditor requirements before he attempts it, 374
a failing country, 12 blow defined, 229
linkage between drugs and breakdown of the social blow
is accompanied by a BD and F/N, 230
and industrial culture, 164 bogs, handling, 235
Man has not necessarily properly defined everything
BPC manifestations, 236
in his technical sphere or culture, 349
calling back a distance as an indication, 231
Method 9 is a great civilization saver, 141 calling
the date found back to the pc, 83, 231
one would have to de-aberrate a man before his whole
calling the location back to the pc, 83
social structure could be de-aberrated, 12
changing from meter dating and meter locating to
shattered civilizations and Crashing Mis-Us, 348
accepting and taking the pc's data, 232
there is no field in all the society where false data is
correct date will blow, 236
not rampant, 367 correct location will blow, 236
we have drifted down in literacy to a point where the
Dating Drill 1, 233
culture can't read or hear, 128 Dating Drill 2,
233
what probably underlies the causes for the current
definitionsofdatingand locating, 228
drug culture, 130 Dianetic Clear Special
Intensive and, 336, 338
why this technical culture is failing, 128 errors
that result in no blow, 231
cure(s), essence of, 83, 236
almost anything which comes later is a cure for some-
False Data Stripping and, 374
thing earlier, 23 finding the data by
metering, 234
preassessing the unwanted pains or feelings before the
if you suspect a blow and pc hasn't volunteered this,
cure, 22 handling, 233
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Date/Locate (cont,) death, dead (cont,)
implant dates vs, actual dates, 230 half dead as a
being, 311
Int RD correction drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow,
proof that Man is a spiritual being, timeless and death 79
less, 211
Locating Drill 1, 233 debate, Socratic equation and, 369
Locating Drill 2, 234 debug, debugging, debug tech,
locating is not done rotely, 232, 235 applies from the
very small expected action to the huge
Natural Clear and 338 expected project, 407
never let pc struggie if he can't find the data, 232
area or individual creating problems and demanding
never resort to the meter if pc can find and give the
solutions to them, handling, 405
data, 232 auditor and Cramming assignment
policies for metered
never use meter to challenge, 'correct' or invalidate
debug actions, 431
pc's data, 232 case histories to show how
Crashing Mis-U finding
no blow F/N when the full date is found, handling, 234
goes, 353
no blow occurs, handling, 81 Crashing Mis-U finding
and, 347, 352
no blow on locating, handling, 234 Crashing Mis-U
may not be on the subject of the prod
no blow on pc giving the date or auditor meter dating
uct itself but in an area related to the subject, 362
it, handling, 231 Crashing Mis-U tech is used
in debugging products,
not a rote procedure, 229 348
not getting a blow on calling the location back to the
debugging a lack of products and accomplishments of
pc as an indication, 231 an org or post,
408
not getting a blow on finding the direction and dis-
Debug Tech Checklist, 408
tance, 231 definition, 400
on the point he went Dianetic Clear, 244, 256 do
not go for an all-organize or an all-production
pc can be made more dependent or more independent
handling, 406
of the meter, 229 EP, 352, 407, 409
pc is out of PT fixed by both date and location, 236
evaluators and, 407
preliminary step, 232 executives and, 401
procedure, 81, 233 false data handled with two-way
comm, 354
purpose of dating, 230 faulty debugging, handling, 391,
406
purpose of locating, 231 finding a product that can
be gotten out, 409
reads of implant dates vs, actual dates, 230 first
action in debugging an area, 401, 409
reference, 336 getting off the track and clearing up
a whole subject
R-Factor to give to pc, 232, 233 that has nothing
to do with getting out his product,
rule on metering, 229 356
situations that dating and locating handles, 228
gradient approach is used, 352
summary, 236 hatting problems, debug of, 403
systems of measurement of distance, 231 history
of, 400
theory of, 228 how long to continue debugging, 352
two separate drills for dating and locating, 232
inadequate organization to get the product, handling,
understanding the mechanics of, 83 406
uses of, 228 inspecting his area as regards
products, 349
use the system of time measurement that the pc uses,
inspecting the area, 401
230 inspection to see what is going on in terms
of produc
while locating, pc starts running the incident or gives
tion, 409
too much "scene," handling, 236 list of things
that could be standing in the way of pro
why you date and locate, 228 duction, 408
datum, data, marry up routine M9 with Crashing Mis-U
finding and
A=A=A is the way most people handle data, 326
all of its steps where the person isn't making it
accept the pc's data during dating, 231
otherwise, 362
collision of false data and true data, without the person
nonproducing areas, handling, 407
knowing which is which, 370 no organization,
handling, 406
false data, see false data no products are coming out,
handling, 402
he cannot think with the data and it does not seem to
orders, debugging of, 402
apply, handling, 371 overt products, remedy of,
405
inability to think with data reason for, 368 personnel
problems, debug of, 403
never resort to the meter if pc can find and give the
procedure, 401
data (in dating), 232 Product Clearing and, 352
true data vs, false data, 435 Product Debug Repair
List, 391
verbal data; see verbal data Product Debug Repair
List, use of, 406
why trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
production and, 400, 401
on the subject does not work, 369 purpose of
debug tech, 352
dead horse list, references, 400
definition, 36 things one might expect to come across
and have to
don't extend a, 36 handle in order to debug a
cycle or product, 353
handling, 36 turning insolvency into solvency, 401
deafness, misunderstoods can act as perception shut-
turning out a type of product nobody wants, handling,
offs, 329 405
death, dead, use of, 401
death slide as a being, 311 use the whole debug tech
procedure without trying to
exteriorization and, 44 short cut it, 352
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
debug, debugging, debug tech (cont,) deflnltion(s) fcont,)
wrong stat, debugging a, 404 spending a lot of time
clearing words within definitions
wrong VFP or wrong product, debugging a, 404 of
words, handling, 183
you've done full Crashing Mis-U and product debug
substitute definition, 365
procedure and still haven't gotten the Crashing Mis-
synonyms, clearing of, 134,182
U, handling, 361 technical or specialized
definitions, when to clear
Debug Tech Checkllst, them, 133,182
EP of debug actions, 409 types of misunderstoods,
129
form, 408 unsuitable definition, example, 364
handling a bogortrouble on, 409 verbal hatting is the
main source of false definitions
use of, 406, 408 and false data, 367
declare(s); see a/so attest which definition to clear first,
133
adjudication and declare of the state of Dianetic Clear,
Word Clearer's first action is to himself look up the
200 definition and derivation of the word,
351
Dianetic Clear false declares, 328 delerlum tremens,
Vitamin B1 and, 171
evaluating for or feeding a pc data to persuade him to
delivery,
declare Dianetic Clear, 328 Advanced Org services,
272
false declares and Quickie Grades brought about by Class
IV Org services, 269
lack of Word Clearing, 375 Class Vl Org (Saint
Hill) services, 271
defense mechanlsm, courses Class IV Orgs teach, 271
Crashing Mis-U finding and, 351 Flag services, 273
person can have a defense mechanism whereby he jus-
miracle results of Word Clearing make all the differ
tifies having a Crashing MU, 388 ence in
the world to the quality of technical delivery,
what it consists of, 351 375
deficiencies, demo kits, Course Supervisor who lets students
study
checking for vitamin and mineral deficiencies before
without dictionaries and, 224
Purification Rundown, 177 dental therapy, pc had
dental therapy, handling, 65
nutritional deficiencies, 170 dental treatment, pc has
tooth decay, handling, 64
why overdosing one vitamin can create a deficiency depravity,
freeing one from, 12
artificially of another vitamin, 173 derivation,
definition(s), clearingthe, 133,182
accurate definition for a word not given in any diction-
definition, 133,182
ary, 365 looking up the, 351
archaic definitions, when to clear them, 134, 182 despair,
Relief RD to handle, 267
asking "What is the definition of ?", 294 destimulation,
illness and, 24
can't find a useful definition, handling, 354 devotion,
what it requires, 20
clearing a word to conceptual understanding, 133, Dewey,
John, false data and, 368
183, 425 Dianazene is remarkably workable today, 172
disassociation between the definition and the physical
Dianetic(s), New Era Dianetics; see also engram running;
universe, 412 Routine 3RA
emotional reactions connected with a rejected defini-
all commands are used, 54
tion, 366 Clear, Dianetic Clear or OT not to be
run on, 191,198
example of how to clear a word, 182 cost of 1950-
1977 processing compared to NED, 265
false definition, 349, 363 description of NED, 265,
266
false definition defined, 363 Dianetic Clear is not
run on, 191,198, 200, 266, 268
he is rejecting the material he is reading or the defini-
discoveries and advancements in tech in 1978, 266
tion of the word he is clearing, handling, 371
"doesn't like Dianetics," handling, 74
homonymic definition, 129, 364 drugs are handled
first, reason, 75
how long to use a word in sentences, 182 EP, 48,
203
how to clear a word, 133, 182 errors must be
repaired with an L3RF, 190
how to clear a word when you don't know the context,
former therapy handling, 65
183 Full Flow Dianetics; see Full Flow Dianetics
idiomshavetobecleared, 134,182 handling somebody
whose "lumbosis" has not sur importance of the Word Clearer
knowing the correct rendered to, 26
definition of the word, 351 how fast and thorough
NED is, 265
incomplete definition, example, 364 illness
handling, 24
incorrect definition, example, 363 is its own field
of C/Sing, 55
invented definition, example, 363 NED rule, 210
learn the full definition for a word as well as its syno-
pc run on Dianetics on the Int RD after Dianetic Clear,
nyms, 365 handling, 191 ,198
Man has not necessarily properly defined everything
people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't
in his technical sphere or culture, 349
recover, 91
missing from the dictionary, 349, 365 power of NED,
266
misunderstood word or symbol in the definition, hand-
Prepared Assessment Form, what it handles, 267
ling, 134,183 Quadruple Dianetics; see
Quadruple Dianetics
no-definition, example, 365 references to study and
demo out what each R3RA
notes in dictionary on word usage must be cleared,
commanddoes,210
134,183 remedies all remain in full use, 55
obsolete definitions, when to clear them, 134, 182
results of NED compared to old Dianetics, 269
omitted definition, example, 365 results, what you have
to know to get uniformly good
PTS C/S-1 definitions sheet, 296 results, 210
rejected definition, example, 366 running past lives as
"imaginary," 91
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Dianetic(s), New Era Dlaneffcs; (cont,) Dianetic Clear(s) (cont,)
runningthe missingflowsif reading, 57 individual
thinks he might be Dianetic Clear, hand
Single Dianetics; see Single Dianetics ling, 333
speed that NED pes are aehieving, 265 Int is still out
for some peeuliar reason, handling, 191
state of Clear ean be aehieved on, 200 Int RD and, 32,
43, 79, 191, 198, 211
Triple Dianeties; see Triple Dianeties Int Rundown
Correetion List Revised and, 84
understanding the funetion and purpose of each of the
invalidation by running certain processes that a Clear
R3RA commands in a Dianetic session, 210
wouldn't respond to, 256
unreading questions and items, 36 is a Clear, 200
Dianetic auditor(s),NEDauditor(s), item stating pc has
gone Dianetic Clear reads on a
can salvage a person in under 100 hours, 270
correction list, handling, 333
confidence as a, 210 Keyed-Out Clear vs, 257
must understand the function and purpose of each of
L3RF reads and, 144, 221
the R3RA commands in a Dianetic session, 210
manifesting PTSness and illnesses due to being audited
references to study and demo out what each R3RA
past Dianetic Clear, 243
command does, 210 meter phenomena on a, 257
requirements to run Quad Dianetics, 55 NED for OTs can
be given once he is OT III, 200
what you have to know to get uniformly good results,
not moving up the Bridge but remaining "parked"
210 at some point due to being audited
past Dianetic
when to retread a, 52, 54 Clear, 243
Dianetic Clear(s); see also Clear OT 1 and, 252, 272
adjudication and declare of the state, 200 out-Int
and, 213
appearing to be no case gain, out-ethics case due to
Quickie Grades and, 332
being audited past Dianetic Clear, 243 past life
Dianetic Clears, 243, 266, 268
attempting to attest in order to save money or for status
pc originates he has achieved Dianetie Clear, handling, 200
reasons, 256 pe run on Dianeties on the Int RD
after Dianetie Clear,
attested to Dianetie Clear and has not had a formal
handling, 190,192,198
auditing session toestablish it, handling, 333
person wanting to attest but clearly hasn't made it,
attests, 243 handling, 257
attests-additional data, 256 person who has
attested but hasn't made it, handling,
audited past Dianetic Clear, manifestations of, 243
257
auditing the, 332 Power, R6EW, Clearing Course and,
252
becoming inactive as a Scientologist due to being
programming for his next step, 252
audited past Dianetic Clear, 243 PTS RD and, 91,
292
bonded by HCO before given access to confidential
references, 333
Dianetic Clear HCOBs, 344 rehab of, 272
calling in suspected Dianetic Clears for confirmation,
R-Factor for person who has attested to but hasn't
257 attained Dianetic Clear, 257
checkouts to do before auditing Dianetic Clear or R3RA
audited over and beyond Dianetic Clear as a
Natural Clear on the grades, 332 primary
reason for case bogs, 189
Clearing Course and, 252, 272 running Dianetics on
Dianetic Clear gives semblance
C/S 53 reads and, 221 of no case gain, 268
Date/Locate on when the pc went Dianetic Clear, 256
Super Power and, 252, 271
declare of the state, 200 suppressive act to send pc
through to attest to Dianetic
declaring a Dianetic Clear "achieved in other prac-
Clear whenhehasn't truly made it, 244
tices," penalty for, 328 unacknowledged
Dianetic Clear, handling, 256
definition, 200 unacknowledged Dianetic Clears,
recognition of, 243,
Dianetic Clear Repair List and, 244 256
Dianetics is not run on, 191, 198, 200, 266, 268
unhandled drugs on a Dianetic Clear, handling, 262
D of P interviews and, 333, 334 went Dianetic Clear
and never attested, 60
do not try to convince pc he has gone Dianetic Clear,
went Dianetic Clear in his past life, 243
244 what he can be audited on, 200
drugs reading on C/S 53, handling, 221 what he is not
run on, 200
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List and, 187
who can send pc through to attest to, 244
End of Endless Int Repair RD and, 190 who hasn't truly
made it will not make it on the OT
establishing for the person who has not yet made Dia-
levels, 244
netic Clear that he hasn't, 334 why the state
has to be verified, 272
ethics trouble, low OCA or poor case gain due to un-
Dianetic Clear Repair List, Dianetic Clear and, 244
acknowledged state of, 256 Dianetic Clear Routing
Form, use of, 256
ethics warning, 244 Dianetic Clear Special Intensive,
evaluating for or feeding a pc data to persuade him to
alternative choices to the, 334
declare, 328 checking False and then Protest
if necessary, 339
Expanded Grades and, 270, 332 C/Sing of, 335, 336
Expanded Green Form 40RD and, 262 Date/Locate step, 336
false declares, 328 Dianetic Clear Special Intensive
Assessment List and,
feeding or coaxing pc to any cognition is a comm-evable
337, 339
offense, 200 DTS stat for completion of a, 162
folders must be clearly marked "Dianetic Clear," 200
EP, 337
Green Form and, 261 establishing for the person who
has not yet made Dia
incomplete on Grades 0-IV, handling, 252 netic
Clear that he hasn't, 334
individual not doing well after an attempt to rehab the
evaluating for pc by asking what his abilities are in
state of Dianetic Clear, handling, 333
relation to his mental image pictures, 338
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive (cont,) dictionary,
dictionaries, (cont,)
FES is the first action, 334 misunderstood word or
symbol in the definition, hand floating TA and, 337
ling, 134, 183
folder study and, 334 notes in dictionary on word usage
must be cleared,
HCOB on, 333 134, 183
if he has gone Dianetic Clear and you have to handle
obsolete definitions, when to clear them, 134,182
Int, lists or repair past auditing before doing the,
omitted definition, example, 365
335 Oxford English Dictionary, The, 182
item stating pc has gone Dianetic Clear reads on a
recommended dictionaries, 182
correctionlist,handling,333 Shorter Oxford
Dictionary, 182
messed up Date/Locate, effects and handling of, 338
simpler dictionary, get a, 183
no interest and didn't go Clear in past auditing, hand-
spending a lot of time clearing words within definitions
ling, 335 of words, handling, 183
Paid Completion points for, 162 synonyms, clearing of,
134,182
person hasn't yet attained Dianetic Clear, handling,
technical or specialized definitions, when to clear them,
337 133, 182
procedure, 335 what kinds to have available, 132
purchase of auditing for the, 334 which definition to
clear first, 133
references, 333 "word chains," handling, 183
requirements for C/Ses and auditors delivering the, diet,
344 formula for finding the exact and proper
diet, 169
situations it is designed to handle, 333
Purification Rundown and, 169
two-way comm and, 335 diet pills, 165
use of, 334 Director of Processing, auditor-pc
assignment policies,
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List, 431
EP, 339 Director of Revlew, handling bogged students and
their
form, 339 twins, 384
Method 3 and, 337, 339 Director of Tech Senlces, stat for
completion of Dianetic
use of, 337, 339 Clear Special Intensive, 162
what to do if it shows up that the person didn't actually
dirty needle(s),
make Dianetic Clear, 339 bad TRs causing, 10
Dianetic C/S-1, breaking Auditor's Code causing, 10
done on unindoctrinated pc before Int RD, 100
causes of, 10
Drug Rundown and, 76 Confessionals and, 247
isn't auditing, 100 needle goes dirty in a rehab
session, handling, 10
Dianetic Debug and Repair, mention of, 274 persisting, what
it means, 247
Dianeticlst, Clear in last life, 243 R/S vs, 247
Dianetic Item(s\, will turn into an R/S or will fully
clean, 247
do not check interest on drug items, 76 withholds
causing, 10
Full Flow Table; see Full Flow Table Disability Rundown,
disability handled by, 267
multiple somatic items, do we Triple or Quad them,
disassociation between the definition and the physical
58 universe, 412
unreading items are not run, 253 disciplining them for going
past Mis-Us, 356
unreading questions and items, 36 discomfort, standard C/S
for, 33
Dianetic List(s), disconnect or handle, 290
listing and marking reads in prior assessment, 22 disease,
pc has infectious diseases, handling, 64
reads and, 36 distance,
unreading questions and items, 36 calling back a
distance (Date/Locate procedure), 231
Dianetics Course, is basically a consideration, 231
NED Course takes 3 weeks for the able student, 266
systems of measurement of, 231
pc who goes Ext in auditing being made to do the
distractive, good auditor is never distractive to a pc, 419
Hubbard New Era Dianetic Course before further
Division6, mild TRs Course in, 434
auditing, 101 divorce, out-ethics and, 224
Dianetics 55!, TRs data and, 434, 436 Dixie, waiting for the
meter to play, 1
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive, slow students han- D/L; see
Date/Locate
dled with, 267 Dn; see Dianetics
diarrhea, Vitamin C causing, 171 DN; see dirty needle
dictionary, dictionaries, do, doingness, done(s),
accurate definition for a word not given in any diction-
not dones and half dones, reason for, 347
ary, 365 people who have to have before they
can do, 411
archaic definitions, when to clear them, 134, 182 SPs
deny do and enforce unwanted do, 127
Course Supervisor who lets students study without TRs
are adoingness, 433
dictionaries and demo kits, 224 why ability to
get things done in an area dwindles, 330
derivation of word is cleared, 182 doesn't want auditing,
handling, 61
dinky dictionaries and omitted definitions, 365 D of P;
see Director of Processing
dinky dictionary defined, 132 D of P Interview,
example of how to clear a word, 182 Dianetic Clears
and, 333
Funk and Wagnalls Standard English Dictionary, 182
nonstandard actions or interviews forbidden, 432
how to clear a word, 133, 182 out-tech to try audit
or rehab in an interview, 333
idioms have to be cleared, 134, 182 using a C/S 53
in a, 221
missing or false definition in the, 349 "double flunk"
defined, 382
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
DRD; see Drug Rundown drug(s) (cont,)
dreams are essential in life, 401 preventing widespread
clearing, 163
drill(s\(ed)(ing), prior assessment and, 22
auditors must be checked out and drilled on new mate-
Prior Assessment to Drugs is only a partial handling, 75
rials, 52 processmg results attained on person
who has been on
dummy drilling Auditing by Lists, 72 heavy
drugs vs, non-drug person, 165
E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze, 312 production
difficulties linked to, 164
E-Meter Drills, twinning on, 378 program execution
difficulties linked to, 164
for reading through an F/N, 255 Purification Rundown
mandatory to any person who
High Crime checkouts and, 375 has been on LSD
or heavy drugs, 166
Mood Drills procedure, 305 reason person took drugs,
23
person cannot be drilled into confronting, handling, 311
reason we are handling drugs and drug deposits in the
TRs are, 418 body, 165
TRs are gotten in by drilling them hard, 433 removal of
life-hostile chemical substances from the
TRs, how they are taught and drilled, 436 body,
166
twinning on practical sections of courses is manda-
resistivecasesand, 73
tory, 379 restim of whatever the effects of the
drug or medicine
two separate drills for dating and locating, 232
were, 175
when he can't get through a specific drill or exercise in
restimulation of a full-blown "trip," 168
his training materials suspect false data, 368
seeking same thrill attained from drugs, handling, 64
Why Finding Drill-Two, cancellation of, 304 somatic
shut-off due to, 22
drug(s); see also medicine; poison staying in the body
and releasing themselves now and
abilities to concentrate or to balance are injured by, 74
then, 221
alcohol; see alcohol sulfa drugs, 159
Angel Dust; see Angel Dust taking heavy drugs and
alcohol because he had with antibiotics; see antibiotics
holds and could not confront, 311
aspirin, do not audit a pc who has taken, 27 wants to
continue to take drugs, handling, 64
attitudeof apersonchangedby, 164 what probably
underlies the causes for the current
biochemistry and fluid balance of the body probably
drug culture, 13()
disarranged by, 165 whole track drugs m)t asked
for on Drug RD, 76,186
biophysical processes do not work in the presence of,
whole track pictures turned on by, 74
165 why drugs are handled first, 75
breakdown of the social and industrial culture linked
drugcase(s),
to, 164 afraid of running engrams, 74
can lodge in the tissues, 165 blank periods and, 74
case gain prevented by, 163, 164, 165 "can't run
engrams" means a, 92
Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear reading on drugs on C/S
description, 73
53, handling, 221 detecting a, 74
Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear with unhandled drugs, does
not make stable gains until the condition is han handling, 262
dled, 74
compulsiontostill use drugs, lesseningof, 23 drug
personality secretly harboring hostilities and
crimeand, 164 hatreds ,164
curious about drugs, handling, 65 prior assessing and,
22
damage is only successfully handled by auditing, 74
reason person took up drugs, 23
damage to the brain or nerves, 178 resistive cases
and, 73, 74
definition, 74 seldom goes backtrack well, 73
deposits inside cells, 170 seldom runs on any other
type of engram, 73
Dianetic pc who has had drug handling omitted, hand-
TRs Course and, 437
ling, 75 drug personality, 164
do not audit a pc who has taken aspirin or, 27 Drug
Rundown,
drug engrams, 74 cost of old DRD compared to NED DRDs,
265
endocrine system upset by, 174 do not check interest
on drug items, 76
flushing poisons and chemical substances out of the
endless Drug RD, reason for, 185
body, 167 end of endless Drug RDs, 185
handling, 73 End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair
List and, 185,
high TA and drug case, 22 187
high TA caused by drug chain, 54 how fast and thorough
NED is, 265
learning rate vs, 165 NED Drug RD requires only a few
intensives, 186, 266
LSD; see LSD old DRD, getting it handled
terminatedly, 267
medical drugs are included, 74 prerequisite for
Course Supervisor is Grade IV and,
medicinal drugs have gone into "restim" years after
309
they were taken, 165 prior assessment procedure,
77
memory vs, 165 procedure in full, 75
mental actions do not work in the presence of, 164
references, 73
names of, 74 steps in brief, 186
niacin deficiency created by LSD and street drugs, 171 Sweat
Out Program and, 75
nutritional deficiencies created by, 171 TRs Course and,
437
Objective Processes do not work in the presence of, 165 whole
track drugs not asked for, 76, 186
overwhelm and, 74 who the NED Drug RD is for, 186
pc not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol why
drugs are handled first, 75
history, 75 why it can't be run flat, 185
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
dull feeling due to Mis-U, 130 E-Meter(s), meter(s) (cont,)
duplicating, duplication, cans; see cans
false data standing in the road of, 373 can
squeeze; see can squeeze
Mis-U keeps a person from duplicating what the writ-
carbon pot vs, wire wound pot, 323
ten materials actually say, 129 Clear's
postulates read as a surge, 257
not confronting and duplicating in an area due to mis-
Clear vs, aberree on the, 1
understoods, 330 Dianetic Clear meter phenomena,
257
person is not duplicating the material he has studied
do not tell pc what meter is doing, 70
despite Word Clearing, handling, 371 electrical
resistance of mental mass recorded on the,
dynamic(s); see also various dynamics by number 45
Conditions and Exchange by Dynamics, what it han-
electrodes; see cans
dles, 270 false data preventing misunderstoods
from reading on
Crashing Mis-U crashes something across the, 360
the, 388
getting a readable and workable meter,
316
how an incorrect can squeeze gives an
inaccurate,
unreliable needle reaction, 312
E how to read through an F/N, 254
if pc's case is improving he becomes
more independent
of the, 229
earlier beginning, is right even when it seems to make
the pc wrong,
command for R3RA, 48 except when it's a false
read, 323
High TA and, 44 loose connection in the leads or meter
causing R/S, 321
why ignoring the earlier beginning of an engram causes
Mark V and Mark VI, 275
TA to go up, 44 Mark VI E-Meter, why it was
needed, 275
earlier Incident, meter check after handling O/Ws in
nonmetered Crash command for asking for earlier incident in
narrative ing MU finding, 350, 388
handling on drugs, 76 metering; see metering
command for R3RA, 48 never resort to the meter if pc
can find and give the
high TA and, 44 data (in dating), 232
earlier similar, never tell pc that it read, 71
asking for an earlier similar in Auditing by Lists, 71
never use meter to challenge, 'correct' or invalidate
command for False Data Stripping, 372 pc's data
when dating, 232
command for running Int with R3RA, 48 only the meter
knows, 2
command for use in Confessionals, 248 person will not
necessarily read on something that he
Earth, believes to be true, 371
psychologist's mission to make the population into
position of, 70,145
controllable zombies, 435 pulling withholds off
the, 390
psychology is the most false subject on the planet, 435
reacts only on the reactive mind, 1
what success in clearing this planet depends upon, 224
read means there is charge present and available to
Eastern beliefs, handling pc who has held or is currently
run, 253
holding Eastern beliefs, 66 responds instantly, 2
Eastern rltes, handling pc who has taken part in earlier
sensitivity; see sensitivity
Eastern rites, 67 speck of dust in the 'pot'
causing R/S, 323
Eastman Kodak, 368 "That's clean" or "That reads" is not
said to pc, 70
eating, students not permitted to eat or smoke in the
unmetered Crashing Mis-U finding, example, 355
course room, 224 waiting for the meter to play
Dixie, I
EB; see earlier beginning watching, I
economics, Lord Keynes treatises on, 368 what a read
means, 253
educating, education; see also study; training when a pc
is cogniting, look at the meter not the pc, 7
educating the PTS, 293 why a pc can have a broken leg,
yet it might not read,
effect of having gone past many, many Mis-Us in read-
37
ing or education, 130 why assessments are wrong
sometimes, 1
factors missing in modern permissive education, 378
why you cannot run anything not charged (reading),
John Dewey and, 368 191
uneducated pcs and C/S Series 53 Long Form, 220 why
you only run what the meter says, 1
uneducated pcs require flawless topnotch auditors, 1 01
why you run what reacts on the meter, 1, 253
why trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
word not reading on the meter because the person
on the subject does not work, 369
"thinks he knows," 367
effect, E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze, 312
how pc goes the effect of the antagonistic terminal, E-
MeterDrills, twinning on, 378
276 E-Meter Essentials, errata sheet, 319
training at cause vs, training at effect, 379
emotion(s),(al),
effectiveness reduced by false data, 374 emotional
reactions connected with a rejected defini
Egyptian priests, 165 tion, 366
electrical reslstance, mental mass and, 45 fixed or stuck
in a chronic mood, 305
electrodes; see cans Mood Drills procedure, 305
electronic practlces, handling pc who has taken part in moods
or emotions are usually "automatic," 305
earlierelectronicpractices, 67 shut-off
emotions reappearing on the Purification
E-Meter(s), meter(s); see also reads Rundown, 175
all needle response is reactive, 2 encyclopedia(s),
ARC Broke meter that won't record a read, 7 Method 9
Word Clearing and, 132
believe your meter, 71 used to clear up a misunderstood,
366
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
endocrine system, end phenomena fcont, )
drugs upsetting the, 174 Expanded Green Form 40RD
EP, 262
minerals and, 174 False Data Stripping EP, 373
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List, F/N is one of
the parts of, 322
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 187 GIs always
accompany a real F/N, 71
form, 187 Green Form EP, 262
Method 5 and, 187 Int RD EP, 48,195
old DRD handled terminatedly with, 266, 267 Int RD EP
data, 213
prerequisite is C/S 53RL, 185, 187 Int RD EP vital
data, 217
selling it as a rundown on the basis of one intensive, 267
of each reading flow of each Problems Process on the
use of, 266, 267 Suppressed Person RD, 278, 280
what it resolves, 185 prepared list and, 222
who it is for, 185,187 PTS RD EP, 92, 292
End of Endless Int Repair Rundown, Purification Rundown
EP, 178
auditors who should not be let near an, 99 Suppressed
Person RD EP, 276, 277, 278, 280, 292
cautions and C/S tips, 194 TRs EP, 437
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 79, 212 two-way
comm sessions EP, 41
commands for running an Int button, 193 when a pc
is cogniting, look at the meter not the pc, 7
commands (Recall Quad Flows commands for Int when pc
exteriorizes in session it is the EP for that
buttons), 203 process or action, 80,
99,105
C/S 53 as next action after the, 197 enemy, don't leave an
enemy financed and solvent while
description, 189 you let your friends starve, 14
Dianetic Clears and, 79, 190, 212 enforced have, definition,
94, 126
EP, 221 engram(s); see also incident; Routine 3RA
false read on assessment of the Int buttons, causes of,
"can't run engrams," what it means, 92
194 chains; see chains
for Clear or OT who has not had an Int RD, 220
doesn't want to be run on engrams, handling, 74
Int buttons list, 193 drug engrams, 74
Int RD and, 189 druggies and, 74
Int Rundown Correction List Revised and, 84 failing to
erase, handling, 68
Int Rundown Table and, 191,198 incident; see incident
is one of the most important single auditing actions an
revivification of an, 259
auditor can do, 189 service facsimiles and, 389
Non-lnterference Zone and, 190 sickness caused by
engram chains, 24
not a substitute for Int RD or Int RD Correction List,
Straightwire overdone can key in underlying engrams,
190 370
not to be sold or passed off as a method of exteriorizing
engram running; see also chains; Routine 3RA
a pc, 105 afraid of running engrams, 74
one-week wait, reason for, 194 "can't run engrams,"
what it means, 92
pc has a large cog, F/N, Gls, handling, 192 check an
item and flow for read before running, 37
pcs it can and can't be run on, 190 Dianetic Clear
is not run on Dianetics, 192, 198, 200,
person run on End of Endless Int while on OT III,
266, 268
handling, 190 doesn't want to be run on
engrams, handling, 74
procedure, 192 Drug Rundown procedure in full, 75
purpose of, 190 earlier beginning; see earlier
beginning
reassessment of the buttons after the week wait, 194
earlier incident; see earlier incident
Recalls, liabilities and advantages of running Recalls
engrams fail to erase, handling, 68
on Int, 213 erasure; see erasure
revivification occurring during, 259 Flow Zero, how
to put it in on a Single or Triple pc, 53
things that could go wrong, 194 former therapy
handling, 65
uses of, 49,189,190 people who don't go past track in
Dianetics don't
weak or ill pcs and, 79 recover, 91
what it handles, 269 sick pc can easily be overwhelmed
with, 92
when it could be used as a preliminary method for
unreadingflowsarenotrun, 253
handling Int, 190 what happens if you only
run incidents late on the
when it is complete, 192 chain, 44
when to run an, 190 what happens if you only run the
end of incidents, 44
will not repair flagrant Dianetic errors, 190 what
happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
End of Endless Int Rundown; see End of Endless Int run
on later items, 57
Repair Rundown why ignoring the earlier
beginning of an engram causes
end of session, do not end Int RD session with a chain
TA to go up, 44
partially run, 40 why we are safer entering
Int RD by running engrams
end phenomena, to begin with, 213
clearing a word must end in an F/N and VGIs, 184
enterovioform, 159
Crashing Mis-U finding EP, 350, 352 environment(s),
debug tech EP, 352, 407, 409 handle by Suppressed
Person Rundown, 271
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List EP,
pc is restimulated in current environment, handling, 62
339 restimulation caused by out-ruds plus a
suppressive
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive EP, 337
environment or situation, 24
Dianetic EP, 48, 203 rest, quiet and a safe
environment for the PTS Type
End of Endless Int Repair RD EP, 221 Three, 292
end result of a well done Method 9,141 EP; see end phenomena
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
equation, Socratic, 369 ethics (cont,)
erasure(s), erase(d); see also as-is; blowing crimes;
see crimes in Scientology
basic has to be run for the chain or incident to erase,
disciplining them for going past Mis-Us, 356
44 ethics trouble due to unacknowledged state
of Dianetic
engrams failing to erase, handling, 68
Clear, 256
first of a chain or the first part of an experience or a
handling bogged students and their twins, 384
first experience has to be run for the chain or inci-
how standard tech slips down to "some of the tech
dent to erase, 212 being applied when we
can," 223
how as-isness is brought about, 228 how you get a
gradually lowered ethics level, 223
how to get any unwanted persisting thing to vanish,
if one twin goes to Review or Ethics the other goes,
228 381, 382, 383, 384
that which is viewed in its own time, place, form and
in-ethics and out-ethics courses, 223
event can be as-ised, 228 out-ethics; see out-
ethics
what happens if you only run incidents late on the
penalty;see penalty
chain, 44 solution is not to immediately shoot
them for not get
what happens if you only run the end of incidents, 44
ting out the product, 356
error(s), flub(s), goof(s), mlstake(s), when an SP dominates
an area, only ethics actions can
audited pc past exterior, correcting the auditor, 100
handle, 8
auditors who flub, handling, 52 Ethics Hearing for failing
to report on unusual solution
auditors who miss withholds, penalty, 242
advised or used, 6
Bolivar's errors, 11 Ethics Officer,
commonest error in Word Clearing, 366 Comm Ev offense
to allow out-ethics activities in course
C/S Checklist of Int errors, 217 rooms, 224
C/S Series 53 Short Form contains every element that
handling bogged students and their twins, 384
could be wrong with the mind, 220 PTS
handling, 90
C/S who doesn't get high or low TAs handled at once,
R/S reported to, 391
handling, 100 ethics presence,
dating errors which cause no blow, 231 Confessionals
and, 250
Dianetic errors must be repaired with L3RF, 190 Sec
Checking and, 242
End of Endless Int RD, things that could go wrong on,
Ethics Repair List,
194 indicator that something has been missed,
227
flubsmaranyauditingresult,41 special certificate
for any auditor trained to deliver
incomplete confession, errors that cause it, 227
the, 226
Int RD error is corrected as a first action, 98 eucalyptus
oil, 181
Int RD errors, list of, 51, 98, 99, 217 evaluation (In
management),
Int RD flubbed, handling, 190 debug tech and, 407
list errors; see out-lists programming and, 407
Manuela Saenz' mistakes, 16,17,18 where the full tech on
how to execute and program is,
offenses Course Supervisor may be comm-eved for,
407
224 evaluatlve, statement (in assessing) can be
accusative or
out-tech- see out-tech evaluative, 419
out-TRs, see out-TRs evaluator, debug tech and, 407
pc who keeps on goofing, nandling, 63 exchange, product that
has no exchange value, 405
PTS RD errors, 124 Examiner,
PTS RD points of breakdown, 91 high TA due to
"audited over exterior," 32
reason people apparently do not see, hear, notice or
student goes to Examiner at end of M9 session, 134
handleoutnesses, 329 why the C/S can't be the
auditor supervisor and pc
remedy for auditors who make errors on the PTS RD,
interviewer, 7
124 Exam Report, bad Exam Report after Confessional,
sensitivity errors, 154 handling, 250
TRs Course before correcting other auditor or admin
Exchange by Dynamics,
errors, 309 use in debugging an area, 405
TRs outnesses, handling, 434 what it handles, 270
unreading and wrong items run or auditor changing Ex Dn;see
Expanded Dianetics
pc's item or just deciding what to run on pc, 209
execute, where the full tech on how to execute and pro
what leads to wild efforts, new processes and anything
gram is, 407
but cool standard procedure, 7 executlvels~; see also
leader
what prevents the EP of getting a prepared list to F/N,
cracking the back of the most resistive nonproducing
222 areas, 407
when to retread a Dianetic auditor, 52, 54 debugging
a lack of products and accomplishments of
when to retread an auditor, 52 an org or post,
408
Word Clearing errors, 238 debug tech is a vital
executive tool, 401
E/S; see earlier similar have the task of getting out
products, 408
estimate, getting an estimate of a case, 261 how you get
executives who will operate out-ethics,
ethics; see also justice off-policy orgs, 223
any activity cannot be run semi-standardly or with out-
ethics and, 223
"pretty much in-ethics," 223 products and,
408
auditors who fail to handle their pcs' ethics, 223
responsibilities of leaders, 11
Committee of Evidence; see Committee of Evidence
responsible for ensuring juniors are studying, 428
Confessional done for justice reasons is not auditing,
senior who doesn't make sure his staff puts in study
246 time off production hours, 403
Court of Ethics for using verbal tech, 318 situation
where someone does not organize any corner of
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
executive(s) (cont,) F
his area or work or organization or lines, handling,
406
successful executive, one of the attributes ot a, 428
failure(s),
who don't make their juniors study, 428 debugging
a person's failures to produce the products
Executive or Buslnessman's Intensive, 270 required,
356
exercise (physical), reason for failures to remain a
power's power, 20
Purification Rundown and, 167 fall follows at once at the
end of the last word of the ques
sauna and, 180 tion asked, 320
exercises; see practices false data,
Expanded Dianetics, buries itself, 373
improvements in Ex Dn were undertaken in '78, 270 clogs
up ability to think and learn, 374
PTS RD not restricted to, 92 collision of false
data and true data, without the per
Expanded GF 40RD; see Green Form 40 son knowing
which is which, 370
Expanded Grades; see also grades competence and
effectiveness reduced by, 374
Dianetic Clears and, 270, 332 Crashing MU buried by,
388
out-grades, handling, 69 defense mechanism and, 351
what they handle, 270 duplication vs, 373
expert, indulging in interpretations and even outright lies
effects of, 388
to seem wise or expert, 367 examples of false
texts, 368
Ext; see exterior finding a whole textbook false, 368
extend, don't extend on a list that is getting no item, 36
handling it with two-way comm, 354
exterior, exteriorize(s), exteriorization; see also interiori-
hits directly up against the true data, 435
zation; Interiorization Rundown justifying his
overts by accepting false data, 370
"audited over exterior," symptoms of, 32
misunderstoods prevented from reading on the meter
audited pc past exterior, correcting the auditor, 100
by, 388
auditing past exterior, effects of, 34, 43, 98
person who cannot be hatted at all has false data, 403
auditing past exterior, references, 32 prone to
accepting false data, 370
basics on Ext and Int (reference), 212 psychologists
are loaded with, 435
beginning of an exteriorization is the interiorization,
psychology is the most false subject on the planet, 435
45, 212 Socratic thesis-antithesis-synthesis
philosophical equa blows caused by auditing past exterior, 34
tion, 369
death and, 44 sources of, 368
definition, 44, 46, 210 texts and, 368
fact which disproved that Man was an animal, 211 the
less a person can confront, the more false data he
high TA due to "audited over exterior," 32 has
accumulated and will accumulate, 370
Int RD overrun when pc exteriorizes and auditor con-
there is no field in all the society where false data is
tinues past exterior, 217 not rampant, 367
is not the EP of Int RD, 195 TRs and, 434
new pc who exteriorizes on Objectives and has not yet
untrainable on the subject due to false data, 435
had a Dn C/S-1 or any NED auditing, handling, 190
verbal hatting is the main source of, 367
pc exteriorizes in session but hasn't had an Int RD,
when to suspect a person has, 368
handling, 38, 80, 99,105 why getting off false
data on a subject works, 369
pc goes exterior during Int RD, handling, 48, 195 why
trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
pc who goes Ext in auditing being made to do the
on the subject does not work, 369
Hubbard New Era Dianetics Course before further
won't necessarily read because person believes it to be
auditing, 101 true, 370
proof that Man is a spiritual being timeless and death-
word not reading on the meter because the person
less, 211 "thinks he knows," 367
proof that the individual is not a body, 44, 211 False Data
Strlpping,
PTS RD and, 92 auditor and Cramming assignment
policies, 431
references, 102 Auditor's Code applies to, 374
"Try not to be three feet back of your head," 212 bogs,
handling, 374
what happens when you exteriorize somebody who can
be done on or off the meter, 368
hasn't had an Int RD, 45 can be repeated as
often as necessary in any specific
when pc exteriorizes in session it is the EP for that
area of training, 369
process or action, 80, 99,105 cautions, 374
when to order a check on interiorization, 39 command
for earlier similar, 372
with full perceptions, 274 commands, 371
extroverted, twinning gets students extroverted, 378
Crashing MU buried by false data, handling, 388
eval, Change the Civilization Eval, 307 Date/Locate and, 374
evaluation, evaluate, definition, 388
by asking him what his abilities are in relation to his
determining whether or not the person needs this pro mental image
pictures, 338 cedure, 370
definition, 39 employed where needed in checkouts,
375
state of Clear and, 244 EP, 373
event, that which is viewed in its own time, place, form False
Data Stripping Repair List, use of, 374
and event can be as-ised, 228 finding a whole
textbook false, handling, 368
evll Intention, R/S and, 321 gradients and, 369
eyeslght, having a Mis-U just before he received the false
data,
evidence that auditor's eyesight is bad, 145
handling, 373
poor eyesight and misunderstoods, 329 if false datum
does not blow on the Recall steps despite
sight shut off by Mis-U words, 329 going
earlier similar, handling, 374
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
False Data Stripping (cont, ) floating needle(s), F/N
needle(s), F/N(s)ed(ing),
inability to learn and apply handled by, 374 any item
that would cause an F/N to "check" will be
misunderstoods often come up during, 373 hot,
254
new students to Scientology and, 374 auditor backing
off from having to F/N a list, reason,
out-ruds handled before you start, 374 146, 255
overrun, 374 auditor can't F/N a C/S 53, handling,
222
point past which one would not continue, 373 bad
indicators vs, 7
procedure, 370 blow (in dating) is accompanied by a
BD and, 230
recall step, how to avoid overrunning it, 374 can
be more than one F/N per word, 184
repeated use of, 373 clearing a word must end in an
F/N and VGIs, 184
rudiments and, 374 cognition and, 7, 9
solves the problem of inability to hat or train, 368
Confessionals and, 246
steps, 370 Confessionals, F/Ning the original question,
246, 248
Straightwire and, 370 C/S 53 to F/Ning list, 221, 264
summary, 374 definition, 321
theory, 369 definition of F/Ning a prepared list,
144
TR outnesses corrected with, 435 drill for reading
through an F/N, 255
24-hour repair rule, 374 EP and, 322
use of, 368 ethics chit for overrunning a, 5
using meter reads to steer the person, 372 failing to
call F/Ns causing high TA, 149,152
who can do it, 368 floating tone arm defined, 322
why getting off false data on a subject works, 369 F/N
everything, 70, 72
Word Clearing and, 373 F/Ning prepared lists, 144, 222,
254
False Data Stripping Repair List, use of, 374 F/Ning
students, 385
false definition, 363 F/N packs up during assessment of
prepared list,
false read(s), handling, 254
command to check for a, 247 getting a suppressed read
by not being able to read
E-Meter is right even when it seems to make the pc
through an F/N, 145, 254
wrong, except when it's a false read, 323 GIs
always accompany a real F/N, 71
End of Endless Int Rundown and, 194 how an F/N can
obscure a read, 254
indicators of, 247 how they can be obscured, 9,
149,152
"overrepaired" pcs are usually pcs with actual reads
how to get free needles on a pc, 9
missed andfalsereadstaken up, 255 how you
get a suppressed read in F/Ning prepared
pc giving false read whenever Int is mentioned due to
lists, 254
protest, 191 indicating an, 71
verifying that you actually have a read on Int, 191
instant F/N and C/S 53, 220
when to check false and protest during a Dianetic Clear
Int button on the C/S 53, do not just F/N it and go
Special Intensive Assessment List, 339 on,
191
false TA pcs bugged by C/S 53 being done on them, 222
intending to F/N the list but the pc is on a big win,
family, overwhelmed by family connections, handling, 62
handling, 71
fat, low responsibility causing person to F/N,
247
all people have some fatty tissue, 170 Method 3 used to
F/N a prepared list, 144
cleaning up the fat tissue in the body, 170 mistaking
an F/N right swing for a read, 149, 152
exchanging good oil for bad fat in the body, 170 no
free needles show up on a case at all, handling, 7
no such thing as a fat cell, 169 "nonreading, non-
F/Ning" prepared lists, 144
toxic substances tend to lock up mainly in the fat
nulling and F/Ning prepared lists, 144
tissue, 170 overrun and, 5, 7, 9,149,152
fees; see price overrun grades, rehabbing and, 9
FES; see Folder Error Summary overrunning F/Ns causing
high TA, 149, 152
FFD: see Full Flow Dianetics pc protest, upset or apprehension
over extensive repair
FFT; see Full Flow Table actions or a list having to
be F/Ned, main cause of,
fiberglass, 445 146
field staff members, why we have them, 7 persistent F/N;
see persistent F/N
finance, prepared lists that do not read F/N, 145
don't leave an enemy financed and solvent while you
reading through an, 145, 254
let your friends starve, 14 reasons a prepared
list does not F/N, 145
Simon Bolivar and, 13 recognizing a, 7
First Dynamic, sensitivity too high can cause F/N to be
obscured and
First Dynamic world, 383 mistaken for a read,
149, 152
twinning brings people out of their First Dynamic and
sensitivity too high or too low, what it does to F/Ns, 6,
onto the Third, 378 9, 315
Fixated Person Rundown, what it handles, 271 smooth TRs get
you free needles, 10
Fixed Ideas, handling pc who has, 69 speeds up or slows
down or does different things while
Flag, still remaining an F/N, 254
full case resolution at, 273 things that can
swallow up free needles, 7
International Training Org and, 274 thinking
beginning F/Ns are reads, 155
runs on the basis of results or else, 273 wanting to
get one and letting a pc have one, 10
services given at, 273 when it most often occurs, 7
top tech org of the world, 273 widening F/N, 322
what you pay for at, 273 floating TA,
why Flag lower org services cost more, 273
definition, 322
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
floating TA (cont,) Folder Error Summary (cont,)
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive and, 337 name of
the auditor and C/S should be on it, 209
Int RD and, 49, 195 when to get Qual corrective
actions FESed, 423
flow(s) food(s),
checking each flow for a read before running it, 37,
do not audit a pc who has not had sufficient food, 27
96, 253, 277, 280 fads, 169
complete any Int RD flow on any reading button in one
junk foods, 169
session, 40, 48 food presenatives, 164
definitions of the 4 flows, 58 forgive(ness),
five flows to run on PTS RD final step, 126 adverse
reaction to proclamation of forgiveness, hand handling bogged
and missing flows on the FFT, 53 ling, 227
having pc demonstrate the various flows, 192
Confessionals and, 225
inflow;seeinflow person not being able to accept
forgiveness or still
Int and flows, further data on, 212 feeling
bad after Confessional, handling, 227
outflow; see outflow power to forgive, 225, 227
"reaction flow" and "re-reaction flow," 212 statement
of forgiveness used at the end of a Confes running the missing
Dianetic flows if reading, 57 sional, 225, 249
stuck flow; see stuck flow form, that which is viewed in its
own time, place, form
unreading flows are not run, 36, 96,126, 253 and
event can be as-ised, 228
unreading flows, references, 253 former therapy, handling,
65
unreading questions and items, 36 Four Seasons of Manuela,
The, 11
what happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
free(ing),
run on later items, 58 freeing the individual
up spiritually, 163
Flow 0, from depravity, 12
bringing all earlier Dianetic items into four flows, 57
no humanoid is free while aberrated in the body cycle,
definition, 58 12
effect of suddenly beginning Quad without catching
freeneedle;seefloatingneedle
the pc up, 53 Freud, Slgmund, false texts on the
mind and, 368
fourth flow on Int, when it is audited, 54, 57 frlends,
don't leave an enemy financed and solvent while
is not run for the first time on Int, 47, 54, 57, 103, 201
you let your friends starve, 14
putting in Flow Zero, 53, 57 Full Flow Dianetics,
rule on running Flow Zero, 53 cost and selling of,
59
what happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
offering the public FFD, 59
run on later items, 57 results, 59
Flow 1, definition, 58 shadowy remains of somatics blow with
FFD, 59
Flow 2, definition, 58 Full Flow Table,
Flow 3, definition, 58 example, 54, 58
flu symptoms may turn on with niacin, 173 form, 209
flubs; see errors handling bogged and missing flows on
the, 54
flunk(s), is done by the auditor in his admin time for
well done
"double flunk" defined, 382 time credits, 54
Hard Way TRs and, 436 name of the auditor must be
clearly noted on the, 209
if a student flunks a Supervisor checkout on materials
what is listed on the, 54
he's been passed on by his twin, both students get
Fundamentals of Thought, TRs data and, 434, 436
a flunk, 381 Funk and Wagnalls Standard English
Dictionary, 182,
F/N; see floating needle 364
folder(s),
always bring your own folder or get it sent to the AO
if you are going, 272 G
assessment sheets must be placed in pc folder, 391
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive and folder study, 334
folder check before starting a cramming or other Qual gain;
see case gain
corrective action, 423 game(s),
folder study and FES of the Int RD and any repairs of
all limited games come to end, 19
Int RD, 190 players fighting amongst
themselves just to have a, 19
Int Rundown Table, where to keep it in the pc folder,
when the game or the show is over, there must be a
191,198 new game or a new show, 20
locating person's last life folder, 268 games
condition(s),
marking "Dianetic Clear" on them, 200 twins getting
into a, 382
prepared list remains in the folder stapled to the work-
withholds and, 245
sheet, 70 gastroenteritis,
R/Ses, noting of, 248 definition, 173
Folder Error Summary, turned on by niacin, 173
data on unreading and wrong items run or auditor
gephalorldlne, 157
changing pc's item or just deciding what to run on
germ(s),
pc must be available, 209 definition, 156
Dianetic Clear Special Intensives and, 334 virus
infections and germ infections, 156
folder study and FES of the Int RD and any repairs of
Gerontal, 160
Int RD, 190 GF; see Green Form
Int RD botched requires full FES of Int RD, 218 GF 40; see
Green Form 40
Inttroublesand, 197 glands, minerals and, 174
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
glib(ness), Green Form (cont, )
handling the extensively mistrained glib student, 132
Method 3 vs, Method 5, 72
is often trained into students by the current educa-
no or slow case gain handled by, 262
tional methods used in schools, 131 protest
sending the TA up, 72
probable basic anatomy of the glib student, 369
Resistive Cases Assessment, 30, 60
spotting a glib student on M9, 131 ruds won't fly
at start of session, handling with GF,
goals, achievement of one's purposes and, 374 261
"go do's," 14 Study Green Form, what it does, 270
gonorrhea, cycle of action of, 159 used for general
review, 70
good indlcator(s), very good Indlcator(s), use of, 27, 261
clearing a word must end in F/N and VGIs, 184 Green Form
40, Expanded GF 40RD,
good indicators always accompany a real F/N, 71
checking False and Protest, 262
withhold pulling must be thorough and go to real
Clears, OTs, DianeticClearsand, 262
VGIs, 390 EP, 262
goofs; see errors form, 60
grade(s); see also levels item reads on Resistive Cases
Assessment but not on
all grades below Grade VII are subject to overrun, 9
EXGF 40RD, handling, 261
audited with prior grades out, handling, 68 Method 5
and, 60
bypassed wins on grades, handling, 69 no change case
and, 92
can't rehab a grade that hasn't been run, 10 no or slow
case gain handled by, 262
checkouts to do before auditing Dianetic Clear or order
of handling reads on the, 261
Natural Clear on the, 332 Resistive Cases
Assessment and, 261
Dianetic Clear incomplete on Grades 0-IV, handling,
resistiveness of pc's case handled with, 262
252 slow gain handled by, 262, 270
Dianetic Clears and, 332 unhandled drugs reading on
a Clear, OT or Dianetic
difficulties on OT levels prevented by pre-OT having
Clear, handling, 262
grades really in, 332 use of, 261
Expanded Grades; see Expanded Grades what it handles,
270
must not be delivered over persistent F/N, 332 gross
auditing error, looking expectantly at pc for an
must not be skimped on in any way, 332 answer to
an uncharged question, flow or item is a,
out-grades, handling, 69 253
pc goes Clear on a grade, handling, 252 group,
pc has failed to attain other grades, handling, 69
Confessional permits person to again feel a part of his
pc not continuing up the Bridge on his grades, 166
group, 246
pretending grades not attained, handling, 68 group
agreement in an out-ethics course room, 223
Quickie Grades; see Quickie Grades Group Auditors
Handbook, description, 325
rehabbing earlier grades, importance of, 5 Group
Processing,
rehabbing overrun grades, 9 after an Intro Lecture, 269
what Quad Grades and Expanded Grades 0-IV han- use
of, 269
dle, 270 guilt, unsticking person from preoccupation
with his
Grade 0, communication grade is out, handling, 69 guilt
for the bad things he has done, 225
Grade I, problems grade is out, handling, 69
Grade II, O/W grade is out, handling, 69
Grade III, H
pc anxious about change, handling, 69
persisting ARC breaks, handling, 69
Grade IV, Hagen, Victor W, von, 11
new Grade IV engran, running part cannot be run halfdones,
reason for, 347
on Clears, 270 happiness, achievement of, 374
pc has service facs, handling, 69 Hard TRs Course; see TRs
Course
prerequisite for Course Supervisor is Drug RD and, HAS
Course, Hard TRs vs, 436
309 hat, hatted, hatting,
Grade VII, all grades below Grade Vll are subject to
debugging hatting problems, 403
overrun, 9 False Data Stripping and hatting, 368
gradient(s), False Data Stripping solves the problem of
inability to
debug tech used with gradient approach, 352 hat
or train, 368
false data comes off in, 369 handling absence of,
411
HAS Course vs, Hard TRs, 436 person who cannot be
hatted at all has false data, 403
running and, 167 primary reason people cannot be
hatted, 368
TRs and, 142 rising statistics do not continue
rising for long in the
graduated, not getting students through their course
face of neglected hatting and training, 429
and graduated, penalty for, 224 SSO
responsibility for standard staff courses, 426
grammar book, used to clear a word in M9, 137, 138 verbal
hatting is the main source of false definitions
Green Form, and false data, 367
assessing GF Method 5 and sending to C/S for pro- hate(d),
hatred(s),
gramming, 261 drug personality and, 164
case still appears resistive after GF, handling, 261
one is what one is, not what one is admired or hated
Clears, OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 262 for, 15
EP, 262 have, havingness,
form, 27 definitions of "can't have," "couldn't have"
and "en Method 5 and, 27, 72, 261 forced have," 94,126
Method 3 and, 27, 72, 261 people who have to have
before they can do, 411
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
have, havingness (cont,) hostilities, hostile (cont,)
out-Int and havingness, 192 drug personality and,
164
SPs deny Hav and enforce unwanted Hav, 127
removal of life-hostile chemical substances from the
Have You Lived Before This Life? has gone 5X the normal
body, 166
best seller, 275 hours,
HCOB; see Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin cost of
1950-1977 processing compared to NED, 265
HCOPL; see Hubbard Communications Office Policy Full Flow
Table is done in auditor's admin time for
Letter well done time credits, 54
HC Out-Point Plus-Point Lists, NED auditor can salvage a
person in under 100 hours,
cancelled, 56 270
use incorporated as a step of a RD currently under Hubbard,
L, Ron,
research, 300 discovery of niacin's biochemical
reaction, 172
headache(s), early discoverer and instigator of vitamin
therapy, 170
"audited over exterior" and, 32 how long it takes when
I teach a course, 307
Int Correction Lists have been done and pc still has
I never run a pc on things that aren't charged, 253
headaches, handling, 100, 104 what Ron would
do as an SSO, 429
Int RD and, 80 Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin(s);
see also
standard C/S for, 33 technology
healing, calcium and, 174 altering the content of, 318
hear(ing), bonded by HCO before given access to confidential
Mis-U can prevent a person from understanding the
Dianetic Clear HCOBs, 344
remainder of what is heard or written, 329, 347
corrupting their intent, 318
sound shut off by Mis-U words, 329 giving out data
which is contrary to, 318
we have drifted down in literacy to a point where the
interpreting HCOBs or P/Ls verbally or otherwise for
culture can't read or hear, 128 another,
318
heart, Purification Rundown and weak heart, 167 new HCOBs
and High Crime checkouts, 375
heat exhaustion, 168 obstructing their use or application,
318
hell, it's an understatement of what really happens, 275 only
source of technical data is LRH HCOBs, books
heroin, can lodge in the tissues, 165 and tapes, 417
HGC; see Hubbard Guidance Center pretending to quote them
without showing the actual
High Crime, violating designated use of HC Out-Point
issue, 318
Plus-PointListsisa, 300 Hubbard Communications
Office Policy Letter(s); see
High Crime checkouts, also policy
False Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W
alteringthecontentof, 318
handling and service facsimile tech must be employed
corrupting their intent, 318
where needed in checkouts, 375 giving out data
which is contrary to, 318
references, 375 interpreting HCOBs or P/Ls verbally or
otherwise for
Word Clearing and, 375 another, 318
high TA, obstructing their use or application, 318
alcohol case and, 22 pretending to quote them without
showing the actual
auditing past exterior causing, 32, 43, 98
issue, 318
causes of, 44,149,152 Hubbard Guidance Center,
C/S Series 53RK has been done and the high or low
cancellation of HCO PL 23 Oct 76, Internship and
TA persists, handling, 107 HGC, 263
C/S Series 53 to handle, 147,150 no auditor may audit
in an HGC who has not done a
detecting all the reasons for, 107 Hard TRs
Course, 302
drug case and, 22 plummeting HGC Completion
Statistic, 5
drug chain causing a, 54 rehabbing earlier grades,
importance of, 5
earlier beginning and, 44 tech recovery, 5
failing to call F/Ns causing, 149, 152 why we have
them, 7
Int trouble is at once suspected, 100, 104 human; see Man
LIX Hi-Lo TA List Revised and, 107 husband/wife auditing
teams, possible reason they often
L1C is not used on, 72 fail, 242
mechanics of, 44 Hylan spaceflight, 231
medicine case and, 22 hypnotism, handling pc who has taken
part in, 66
overrun and, 9, 44
overrunning F/Ns causing, 149,152
protest sending the TA up, 72 I
Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S to handle, 147
standard C/S for, 33
unrun or flubbed and unrepaired Int RD causes close ideal
scene,
to 100% of reasons for high TA, 99 courses-
their ideal scene, 223
why ignoring the earlier beginning of an engram causes
professional and, 346
TA to go up, 44 Identity Rundown, detached people
handled by, 267
why Int sends the TA up, 195 Idlom(s),
hives may turn on with niacin, 173 definition, 134,182
homonym, have to be cleared, 134, 182
definition, 364 Illness, 111; see also injury
homonymic definition, 129 antibiotics, administering
of, 156
homonymic misunderstoods, 364 auditing past exterior
causing, 98
hostilities, hostile; see also antagonism body is ill,
handling, 63
definition of hostile, 298 broken bones, handling, 63
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Illness, 111 (cont,) Individual(s); see also being; case; Man;
preclear; thetan
cause of sickness, 24 area or individual creating
problems and demanding
chronically ill person is always PTS, 124
solutions to them, handling, 405
destimulation and, 24 freeing the individual up
spiritually, 163
disease cycles of action, 159 handling any
insufficiency of viable products coming
engram running can easily overwhelm sick pc, 92
from an, 401
germ infections, 156 proof that the individual is not
a body, 44
handling a resistive situation, 26 Individuation,
transgression, withholds and, 245
handling illness in Scientology, 24 Indoctrinations,
handling pc who has taken part in earlier
handling somebody whose "lumbosis" has not sur-
indoctrinations, 67
rendered to Dianetics, 26 Industrial culture,
breakdown of, 164
hidden illness, handling, 64 Infections, germ infections
and virus infections, 156
manifesting PTSness and illnesses due to being audited
Inflow; see also outflow
past Dianetic Clear, 243 balancing inflow with
outflow in twinning, 379
measles is a virus illness, 156 training and, 378
most illness is precipitated by suppression, 271 Injury;
see also illness
out-ruds and, 24 broken bones, handling, 63
pc receiving gains or benefits from being ill or dis-
pc has body parts missing, handling, 64
abled, handling, 63 pc has had body parts
removed, handling, 64
PTS RD, currently sick pcs should not be run on it,
pc has physically damaged parts, handling, 64
92 insane, Insanity,
rundown for beating an illness to death, 25 curing
insanity with niacin, 172
seriously physically ill, handling, 63 cycle of action,
insane person normally will not com somatics; see somatics
plete a, 404
Straightwire removed locks and released illnesses with-
"insane people" are seldom wild-eyed maniacs, 303
out the pc ever having run an engram, 370 quiet
types who have little or nothing to say and speak
temperature, antibiotics and, 157 softly, 303
virus infections, 156 Insectbites, 175
Illustrations, fine arts vs, 331 Insecticides, 178
"Imagination," running past lives as, 91 In session, if pc is
not in session you won't get the with
Immortality, holds, 250
key to, 42 Insolvency, turning insolvency into solvency, 401
proof that Man is a spiritual being timeless and death-
Inspection(s),
less, 44 debug tech and, 401
Impingement, evidence that auditor has no impingement first
action in debugging an area is an, 409
with TR I, 145 how to do an investigation, 401
Implant(ing), inspecting an area for products, 349
implant dates vs, actual dates, 230 of products, 401
pc has taken part in earlier implanting techniques,
seeing what is going on in terms of production, 409
handling, 67 Instant F/N, C/S 53 and, 220
Incident(s); see also engram; engram running; picture; Instant
read(s),
Routine 3RA change of characteristic is
followed up on a Sec Check
basic has to be run for the chain or incident to erase,
if it is instant, 322
44 definition, 70, 321
confusion on two incidents, thinking one happened fall
follows at once at the end of the last word of the
before the other when it is actually vice versa, 228
question asked, 320
earlier incident; see earlier incident occur instantly
on calling the command, 278
earlier similar incident; see earlier similar valid
R/Ses are not always instant reads, 249
Int is a compound of stuck flows and prior incidents,
Insullin, remaining on it, 74
212 Int;see interiorization
pc stuck in a past location, handling, 229 intelllgence,
misunderstood words vs, 130
stuck in the time of an incident which acts as PT for
Intensive(s),
him, handling, 228 Dianetic Clear Special
Intensive; see Dianetic Clear
two incidents collapsed into one, time-wise, handling,
Special Intensive
228 Executive or Businessman's Intensive, what
it handles,
what happens if you only run incidents late on the
270
chain, 44 Marriage Intensive, what it handles,
270
what happens if you only run the end of incidents, 44
Money Processing Intensive, what it handles, 271
what has to be run for a chain or incident to erase, 212
NED DRD requires only a few intensives, 266
why you date and locate, 228 Profession Intensive,
what it handles, 271
wrong date for an incident, handling, 228 Teacher or
Supervisor Intensive, what it handles, 270
wrong or occluded location or a confusion between two
Intention, definition of a problem is intention versus
or more locations, handling, 229 intention,
279
Indicator(s), Interest,
bad indicators vs, free needle, 7 do not check interest
on drug items, 76
good indicators; see good indicators staff members
lack of interest or no interest, handling,
manifestation of a withhold in addition to a Crashing
410
Mis-U, 356 Interiorization; see also exteriorization
nonoptimum reactions that may show up in M9, 130
basics on Ext and Int (reference), 212
total organize is an indicator of many misunderstoods
beginning of an exteriorization is an, 45, 212
in the area, 405 birth and, 45
when to check false and protest during a Dianetic
cannot audit over anything else if Int or L & N lists are
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Interiorization (cont,) Interiorization Rundown (cont,)
do not try to fly ruds or word clear over out-Int or out-
EP data, 213
lists, 423 EP, vital data on, 195, 217
further data on flows and, 212 errors, 98, 217
is a compound of stuck flows and prior incidents, 2 1 2
errors (list of), 5 1, 99, 2 1 7
out-Int and End of Endless Int Rundown, 190 errors
(two major errors), 217
out-Int despite having had Int RD and it has been re-
exteriorization is not EP of the, 195
paired, handling, 190 false read whenever Int is
mentioned due to protest,
out-Int, do not audit over, 190, 192, 217, 220, 334
191
pcs on whom Int repeatedly kicks in, handling, 189 FES
is done first if someone is having trouble with Int,
references, 102 197
stuck flow of obsessively going in, 212 FES
required for botched Int RD, 218
using the Recall system to run out-Int, 213 floating
TA and, 49,195
when to order a check on interiorization, 39 flows and
Int, further data on, 212
why Int sends the TA up, 195 Flow Zero is not run
for the first time on Int, 47, 54, 57
InteriorizationRundown, 103, 201
audited over misunderstoods on the, 98 flubbed Int RD,
handling, 190
auditing Int RD successfully, 196 flubbing auditors and,
41
auditor must understand fully the theory and com-
folder study and FES of the Int RD and any repairs of
mands he is running, 206 Int RD, 190
auditor requirements, 46, 99, 100,189, 206 headaches,
80
auditor requirements to do an Int RD correction, 80
Int Correction Lists have been done and pc still has
auditors who should not be let near an, 99
headaches or other Int troubles, handling, 100, 104
auditor who can't smoothly audit Int RD, handling, Int
is a compound of stuck flows and prior incidents,
106 212
auditor who should not be let near an Int pc, 197 Int
Rundown Table; see Int Rundown Table
basics on Ext and Int (reference), 212 is a remedy, 105
beginning of an exteriorization is the interiorization,
is done, if reading, before review auditing, ruds or
45, 212 anything else, 42
breaks, rule regarding, 41 is one of the most
important single auditing actions
button did not read yet was run, 98 an auditor
can do, 189
button read on an MU, handling, 79,103 L1C and, 46
buttons list, 46,193 materials must be checked out
starrate and in clay
buttons must be assessed before clearing, 103
before C/S permits auditor to run it, 103
buttons not reading, handling, 47, 79,103 must be
completed in as few sessions as possible, 40,
cannot audit over anything else if Int or L & N lists are
48
out, 334 must not audit a pc on Int if it is
not charged, 190
Class IV auditor does it, 206 musts, 40
clay demos that are required (list of), 207 not to be
sold or passed off as a method of exteriorizing
clearing only the button with the largest valid read, 218
a pc, 105
Clear or OT with unresolving Int problems, handling,
"Okay to Audit Int RD," form, 207
32 "Okay to Audit Int Rundown" is required, 206
Clears and, 32, 43, 79, 191,197, 212 OTs and, 32, 43,
79, 191,198, 212
command for going earlier must be given fully with the
out-Int and End of Endless Int Rundown, 190
item, 206 out-Int as a primary reason for case
bogs, 189
commands, 47 out-Int despite having had Int RD and
it has been
commands must be cleared excellently for pc's under-
repaired, handling, 190
standing, 206 out-Int, do not audit over out-
Int, 190, 192, 217, 220,
commands (Quad commands for Int buttons), 201
334
complete any flow on any reading button in one ses-
out-Int, handling, 191
sion, 40, 48 overrun, how it occurs, 79,
98,103,194
completing before all flows are run, example, 196
overrun Int, commonest cause of, 194
completing the RD on an intensive basis, 40 overrun
when pc exteriorizes and auditor continues
correct Int RD error as a first action, 98 past
exterior, 217
correction drill: Date to Blow/Locate to Blow, 79 pc
exteriorizes in session but hasn't had an Int RD,
correction list, form, 84 handling, 38, 80,
99,105
C/S Checklist of Int Errors, 217 pc goes exterior
during the RD, handling, 48, 195
C/S 53 as next action after the, 197 pc run on
Dianetics on the Int RD after Dianetic Clear,
C/S 53 Int section gets a read, handling, 191, 220
handling, 192,198
C/Sing Int, 104 pcs on whom Int repeatedly kicks in,
handling, 189
C/S wins and, 106 pc stuck on the stuck flow of
time, 212
determining whether Int is out, 190 pcs who can't
move back on the time track more than
Dianetic Clears and, 32, 43, 79, 212 minutes,
212
Dianetic Clear with Int still out for some peculiar
persistent F/N, handling, 47
reason, handling, 191 persisting Int troubles,
handling, 100,104,199
Dianetic C/S-1 is done on unindoctrinated pc before
preassessment and AESPs are not used on, 104,199
Int RD, 100 preliminary method for handling
Int on certain pcs, 190
dissolving the obsessive stuck flow of going in, 213
procedure, 38, 46
don't run anything else but Int when Int is out, and
protesty because Int has been run or repaired when it
that includes two-way comm, 217 wasn't
charged, 191
End of Endless Int RD is not a substitute for the, 190
"reaction flow" and "re-reaction flow," 212
End of Endless Int Repair Rundown and, 189 reason for
the, 34
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Interiorization Rundown (cont,) Interpretation(s), Interpreting,
Recalls, liabilities and advantages of running Recalls
indulging in interpretations and even outright lies to
on Int, 213 seem wise or expert, 367
references, 51,102 interpreting HCOBs or P/Ls
verbally or othervise for
Registrar selling unnecessary Int RD, 80, 105
another, 318
rehabbing the point of completion, 196 Interview; see D of P
interview; PTS interview
repairing Int RD, clue to, 100 Int RD; see Interiorization
Rundown
repairing pc run on Int RD by R3R or R3RA when he Intro
Lecture, Group Processing after an, 269
was a Dianetic Clear, 190 Int Rundown Correction
List,
repair, most flagrant cause of, 196 auditors who
should not be let near an, 99
repair of, 50, 104, 211 Clears, OTs, Dianetic
Clears and, 84
"repair of repair of repair" of Int, handling, 190 do
not go to another question leaving one that has not
repair, where much of it stems from, 196
F/Ned, 86
review auditing vs, 42 End of Endless Int RD is not a
substitute for an, 190
R-Factor to give pc before doing two-way comm step,
form, 84
38 Int Correction Lists have been done and pc
still has
roller-coaster due to bad Int RD or Int repair, 92
headaches or other Int troubles, handling, 100,
ruds and, 40, 42, 46 104
rules for Int RD sessions, 40 Int Rundown Table and,
191, 198
running Int with R3RA, 48 persisting Int troubles,
handling, 100, 104
shallow running pc, 213 purpose of, 84
simplicity of doing it, 101 R-Factor to give pc, 85
starrate checkouts for, 206 use of, 84,190
starrate with clay demos on the theory and commands
when to end off, 85
is required, 206 Int Rundown Table,
stuck flow of "going in" vanishes, 196 form, 198
stuck flow of obsessively going in, 21 2 out-Int
handling and, 191, 198
summary, 1 02 where to keep it in the pc folder, 1
91, 1 98
theory of, 34 Invalidate(s), Invalidated, Invalidation,
timeitselfcanbeastuckflow,212 by running certain
processes that a Clear wouldn't
trigger that puts pc into his Int engrams, 212
respond to, 256
troubles, answerto, 189 never use meter to
challenge, 'correct' or invalidate
trouble, where it comes from, 106 pc's data when
dating, 232
trouble with Int, correct action to take first, 197
one should not invalidate having known certain people
two-way comm and, 38 before, 91
two-way comm materials that auditor must checkout past
lives being invalidated, 91
and drill on, 104 state of Clear and, 244
two-way comm on Int and Ext, reason for, 33 Invalidate
button,
two-way comm on Int-Ext, procedure, 38 command for
putting in Invalidate button, 247
two-way comm session must follow Int RD by not less
commands to put in "Suppress" and "Invalidate," 37
than a day nor more than a week, 41 ensure
nothing was suppressed, invalidated or mis
two-way comm session, reason for, 41 understood
before leaving an unreading item, flow
two-way comm was omitted or not in a separate ses-
or question, 253
sion, handling, 38 if Suppress or Invalidate
reads, handling, 247
unnecessary Int RD, 79,103,105 no read after putting
in "Suppress" and "Invalidate,"
unreading item run, 98 37
unrun or flubbed and unrepaired Int RD causes close
nulling unrun original items on the list with Suppress
to 1005'o of reasons for high TA, 99 and
Invalidate buttons, 77
use of Recalls is ideal in the handling of repair of Int,
putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood
213 Words on the prepared list, 145
verifying that you actually have a read on Int, 191
when to put it in, 42
weak or ill pc and, 190 Investigation, how to do an, 401
what happens when you exteriorize somebody who
Investigatory procedure, Crashing Mis-U finding is an,
hasn't had an Int RD, 45 349
what it does for the pc, 80, 105 IQ Test, Purification
Rundown and, 166, 176
what it handles, 267 is, one is what one is, not what one
is admired or hated
what it is designed to do, 105 for, 15
what must be blown before you're through with Int, 212
item(s),
what you want to accomplish with it, 49 check
questions, flows or items before running any
when handling Int you address only Int, nothing else,
thing, 253
199 Dianetic item; see Dianetic item
when to order a check on interiorization, 39 don't
extend on a list that is getting no item, 36
when to run it, 38, 42, 54 hanging pc with a
wrong/uncharged item, 190
why Int sends the TA up, 195 item "me" must be
accepted on any S & D list, 237
why we are safer entering Int RD by running engrams
item "me" must never be represented, 237
to begin with, 213 never prepcheck an item
that doesn't read, 36
International Tralning Org, training and, 274 original
item; see original item
internship(s), running item; see running item
cancellation of HCO PL 23 Oct 76, Internship and
testitemsforreadbeforerunningthem,37
HGC, 263 unreading items are not run, 253
certificate expiration if the person has not done the
unreadingquestions and items, 36
internship for the level he is certified for, 309
what to do when pc lists the item "me," 237
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Ivory Tower, leader(s) (cont )
Case Supervisor and, 7, 258 tragedy of Manuela Saenz,
16
reason C/S livesin an, 7 workable formula used
"instinctively" by most suc cessful
practical political leaders, 12
you can't live in a world where even the
great leaders
can't lead, 21
J leads, loose connection causing R/S,
321
learn(ed)(ing),
drugs vs, learning rate, 165
Joburg assessment procedure, 3 false data clogs up ability
to think and learn, 374
junk foods, 169 inability to learn and apply, handling, 374
Justice;seealsoethics when he can't seem to apply what he
has "learned,"
Confessional done for justice reasons is not auditing,
suspect false data, 368
246 with the ability to learn comes stability
and the pro disciplining them for going past Mis-Us, 356
duction of valuable products, 374
justification(s), Justify(ing), Learning Drills, twinning on, 379
Crashing MU and, 388 level(s); see also grades
defense mechanism and, 351 certificate expiration if
the person has not done the
handling of, 406 internship for the level he
is certified for, 309
justifying his overts by accepting false data, 370
C/Sing for a level for which he has not been trained,
references, 388 penalties for, 304
service facsimiles are cousins to, 389 OT levels; see
OT levels
Justinian II, 17 there are other OT levels above VIII, 269
when upper levels above VIII will
probably be re leased, 273
Level II, special certificate for those
trained to admin
K ister Confessional
procedure, 226
L4BRA used for list errors, 70
Keyed-Out Clear, life, living,
Dianetic Clear vs, 257 a life form is a combination of
life itself and the physi
no such thing as, 200 cal universe, 166
Keynes, John Maynard, 368 belief that all life came from
matter, 165
key-out dreams are essential in, 401
Recall Processes and, 194 drug residues stop a
person's life, 165
three to ten day key-out period, 1 94 mechanism of
overrun of life subjects, 9
kidney conditions, Purification Rundown and, 167 once his
TRs are "in" they will stay in for life, 143
know(ing), known, overwhelmed by life, handling, 62
collision of false data and true data, without the person
past life; see past life
knowing which is which, 370 pretending attalnments
m hfe not really attamed,
one should not invalidate having known certain people
handling, 6,8
before, 91 rehab of llfe sltuations of overrun, 7
what is wrong with the pc is not known to the pc, 1
removal of life-hostile chemical substances from the
knowledge, person must be at cause when he is expected
body, 166
to apply knowledge or skills, 379 why the
human race often reacts so oddly to, 272
Kodak, Eastman, 368 you can't live in a world where even
the great leaders
can't lead
life ruds, commands, 25
liquids, Purification Rundown
and, 168
L List(s); see also listing and nulling
Auditing by Lists, 70
correction; see out-lists
Ls, when they can be delivered, 274 correction lists; see
prepared lists
L & N; see listing and nulling Dianetic lists; see
Dianetic lists
late for course, 384 don't extend on a list that is getting
no item, 36
"latent reads," sensitivity too high causing, 154 errors,
see out-lists
LC1; see Crashing Mis-U Repair List item "me" on an L & N
list must be accepted as the
LCRC, when to use it, 249 250 item, 237
bader(s); see also executive out-lists; see out-lists
Bolivar and, 11 prepared lists; see prepared lists
don't leave an enemy financed and solvent while you
unreading questions and items, 36
let your friends starve, 14 Listing and nulling,
foremost law, if one's ambition is to win, is of course
avoid listing the same question twice on PTS RD, 127
to win, 18 converting the PTS RD 2wcs for items
into L & N
frailty of single solutions, 12 questions, 127
having the bravery needed to trust inferior minds and
errors- see out-lists
stand by their often shocking blunders, 15 item
"me" must never be represented, 237
how real powers are developed, 20 never list a listing
question that doesn't read, 36
how to move off a point of power, 19 unreading items
are not run, 253
if you have power use it or delegate it, 20 what to do
when pc lists the item "me," 237
making far too heavy use of a skill simply because it
literacy, we have drifted down in literacy to a point where
is easy, 12 the culture can't read or
hear, 128
responsibilities of, 11 literal rather than literate, 425
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Livingness Repair is often the first action taken on a per- L3RF
(cont,)
son by a professional auditor, 269 Method 3
and, 72
LIX HI-Lo TA List Revised, requires processes, not E/S to
get an F/N, 72
C/S 53RK vs, 107 L12, exterior with full perceptions, 274
form, 107 lungs, eucalyptus oil and, 181
Method 5 and, 107
order of handling reads, 107
location, locating; see also Date/Locate
M
calling the location back to the pc, 83
Date to Blow-Locate to Blow steps, 81
dating and locating, 228 magic, Suppressed Person RD and,
276
definition of locating, 228 magneslum; see also Cal-Mag
Locating Drill 1, 233 calcium and , 1 74
Locating Drill 2, 234 nerves and, 174
pc out of PT fixed by both date and location, 236 magneslum
carbonate, 1 75
purpose of locating (Date/Locate), 231 maJor action(s),
stuck viewpoint of location, handling, 229 C/S 53
and, 264
systems of measurement of distance, 231 End of
Endless Int Repair RD is a, 190
that which is viewed in its own time, place, form and
Int RD is a, 49
event can be as-ised, 228 pc must be set up
before a, 264
theory of dating and locating, 228 set-ups and, 264
why you date and locate, 228 Man; see also culture;
individual
wrong or occluded location or a confusion between two
competence and effectiveness reduced by false data,
or more locations, handling, 229 374
locks, Straightwire and, 370 fact which disproved that Man was
an animal, 211
logic, Socratic equation and, 369 false data clogs up his
ability to think and learn, 374
L1C, increasing the ability of individuals and
the human
done if needle goes dirty in a rehab session, 10
race, 374
Int RD and, 46 is a complex being, 274
Method 3 and, 72 no humanoid is free while aberrated in
the body cycle, 12
not used on high or very low TAs, 72 one would have
to de-aberrate a man before his whole
used for ARC breaks, 70 social structure
could be de-aberrated, 12
"Look at me, Who am I?", 61 proof of the existence of a
thetan, 44
look don't listen, 401 proof that Man is a spiritual being,
timeless and death
losses, Relief RD to handle 267 less, 211
love, what obsessive attraction is based on, 93 taking
responsibility for one's fellow man, 384
low TA, twinning gets students to take
responsibility for their
auditing past exterior causing, 98 fellow
man, 378
caused by overwhelming TRs and incomplete actions, why
the human race often reacts so oddly to life, 272
149, 152 marijuana,
C/S Series 53RK has been done and the high or low can
lodge in the tissues, 165
TA persists, handling, 107 niacin's effect on,
172
C/S Series53tohandle, 147,150 markets, org which never
markets or advertises their
detecting all the reasons for, 107 products,
405
general cause of, 149,152 marriage(s),
Int trouble is at once suspected, 100, 104 cheating
on your spouse, 223
L1C is not used on high omrery low TAs, 72 marital
difficulties, handling, 270
Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S to handle, 147 out-ethics
and, 223
LSD, Marriage Intensive, what it handles, 270
Angel Dust and LSD are the worst, 74 mass(es), mental
mass(es),
burns up B1 and B Complex, 171 auditing past exterior
causing heavy masses to come
can stay in the body and release itself now and then,
in, 98
221 electrical resistance and mental mass, 45
circulation cut off by, 165 materlal(s); see also technology
developed to poison and paralyze whole cities, 267
auditors must be checked out and drilled on new
giving the person unpredictable "trips," 165
materials, 52
is basically wheat rust, 165 Course Supervisor not
making all materials available,
lodging in the tissues, 165 224
niacin breaks up and unleashes LSD from the tissues
twin always refers his fellow student to source materi
and cells, 172 als, 383
niacin deficiency created by, 171 when he can't get
through a specific drill or exercise
Purification Rundown mandatory to any person who
in his training materials, suspect false data, 368
has been on LSD, 166 matter,
remaining in the body, 221, 267 belief that all life
came from, 165
restimulationand, 165 buildingblocksof, 164
restimulation of an LSD trip, 168, 175 "me," as an L & N list
item, 237
L7, Method 3 and, 72 mean reputation pcs, 267
L10, Method 6 is an L10 action, 70 measles is a virus illness,
156
L3RF, media, false data and, 368
Clears, Dianetic Clears, OTs and, 144, 221 medical doctor,
Purification Rundown and, 167
Dianetic errors must be repaired with an, 190 Medical
Officer, Purification Rundown and, 167,177
indicating the read to a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear,
medical treatment, medical,
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
medical treatment, medical (cont,) mineralls (cont,)
pc had medical therapy, handling, 65 multi-minerals
and Purification Rundown, 171
pc has infectious diseases, handling, 64
Purification Rundown and, 174
medicine(s), medication, vegetables and, 169
allergy to, 74 minister, power to forgive, 225, 227
high TA and medicine case, 23 miracles, Crashing Mis-U
finding and, 356
medicinal drugs have gone into "restim" years after
misemotional, missing a withhold causing person to be
they were taken, 165 misemotional or blow,
388
no medication of a medical nature during Purification
missed wlthhold(s); see also rudiments; withholds
Rundown, 176 auditor missing a withhold, what
it stems from, 242
prior assessment and, 22 auditors who miss
withholds, penalty, 242
Purification Rundown mandatory to any person who blows
and, 242, 388
has a heavy medical drug history, 166 commands
to check for M/W/H in Confessional, 248
reason person took up medicine, 22 critical pc and,
248
restim of whatever the effects of the drug or medicine
definition, 297
were, 175 fatal to miss a withhold on someone,
390
somatic shut-off due to, 22 15 manifestations of
(reference), 248
meditation, handling pc currently practicing, 66
misemotional person and, 388
memory, mutual out-ruds and, 242
drugs vs, 165 out-ethics and, 242
returning on the Purification Rundown, 176 upset
caused by missing a withhold, 351
mental exercises, handling pc currently doing, 66 mistakes; see
errors
mental Image pictures, evaluating for pc by asking what Mis-U; see
misunderstood
his abilities are in relation to his mental image pic-
misunderstood(s), mlsunderstood word(s); see also con
tures, 338 fusions; definitions; Word
Clearing
mentally ill pc, handling, 63 ask for instances of
practical usage from the person
mental mass; see mass you found a Crashing Mis-U on,
352
meter; see E-Meter audited over misunderstoods on the Int
RD, 98
metering, blankness and, 366
Date/Locate metering rule, 229 can prevent a person
from understanding the remain definition of mismetering, 146
der of what is heard or written, 329, 347
how to read through an F/N, 254 can't find a useful
definition, handling, 354
rabbittingcausedbyout-TRsorshakymetering, 146
clearing a word to conceptual understanding, 133,
Suppressed Person RD and, 278 183, 425
wrong assessments due to bad metering, 194 comes
earlier in time and is more basic than the with
Method 3, hold, 387
CrashingMis-U RepairListand, 357 complete understanding
depends on freedom from,
definition, 72 376
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List and,
complexity and, 328
337, 339 conceptual understanding, 133,183, 425
F/Ning a prepared list using Method 3,144 confusions
and, 328
Green Form and, 27, 72, 261 Crashing Mis-U; see
Crashing Misunderstood
how you handle a list Method 3, 144 Crashing Mis-U
is not your ordinary common garden
lists that are best done Method 3, 72 variety of
Mis-U, 361
procedure, 70 Crashing MU obscured by MUs and
confusions, hand Product Debug Repair List and, 391
ling, 387
Word Clearing Correction List and, 238 cycles of action
and, 329, 347
Method 5, deafness and, 329
Crashing Mis-U Repair List and, 357 definition, 363
C/S 53 and, 147,150, 220, 221 definition of a
cleared word, 183
definition, 72, 220 definition omitted from
dictionary, example, 365
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List and, 187
detecting if he has or hasn't got the Crashing Mis-U
Expanded Green Form 40RD and, 60 cleared up, 352
Green Form and, 27, 72, 261 disassociation between the
definition and the physical
LIX Hi-Lo TA List Revised and, 107 universe,
handling, 412
Method 3 not Method 5 for F/Ning a list, 144
disciplining them for going past Mis-Us, 356
protest and, 144 dull feeling and, 130
Repair Correction List and, 214 effect of having gone
past many, many Mis-Us in
Resistive Cases Assessment and, 60 reading or
education, 130
Word Clearing Correction List and, 238 effects of, 129,
130
Method 6 is an L10 action, 70 elusive or Crashing Mis-U,
361
mind(s), emotional reactions connected with a
rejected defini
C/S 53 contains everything that can be wrong with a
tion, handling, 366
220, 264, 270 encyclopedia used to clear up a,
366
having the bravery needed to trust inferior minds and
example of how to clear a word, 182
stand by their often shocking blunders, 15
example of when you wouldn't ask him for his Mis-U
reactive mind, see reactive mind in M9, 140
Sigmund Freud'stexts on the, 368 examples of student
reactions and correct handlings
mineral(s), on M9, 135
checking for vitamin and mineral deficiencies before
false data preventing misunderstoods from reading on
Purification Rundown, 177 the meter, 388
endocrine system and, 174 False Data Stripping and,
373
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
misunderstood(s), misunderstood word(s) (cont,)
Misunderstood(s), Misunderstood word(s) (cont,)
getting a student much more aware of and able to poor
eyesight and, 329
find and handle his own misunderstoods, 132 read
caused by an MU, handling, 47,191,198
getting into a lot of think-think and unnecessary signif-
reason for people not studying is always misunder
icance due to, 330 stoods, 428
handling MUs on orders, 403 rejected definition,
example, 366
he is rejecting the material he is reading or the defini-
resistance to finding the Mis-U, examples of, 350
tion of the word he is clearing, handling, 371
robot or zombie due to, 130
homonymic definition, 364 sight, sound and even touch
can be shut off by, 329
homonymic misunderstoods, 364 student must
discipline himself not to go past mis
how long to use the word in sentences, 133
understood words, 366
how to clear a word, 133, 182 substitute definition,
365
how to clear a word when you don't know the context,
suppressing reactions to, 131
183 synonyms, clearing of, 134, 183
if the twin has missed the student's goof, he must have
text book used to clear up a, 366
misunderstoods of his own, 381 total organize
is an indicator of many misunderstoods
incomplete definition, example, 364 in the
area, 405
incorrect definition, example, 363 twin must have a
misunderstood himself if he missed
indicators of a, 130 the other student's goof,
381
Int button read on an MU, handling, 79 types of, 129,
363
intelligence vs, 130 unsuitable definition, example,
364
interrupts not only the cycle of communication or using
the read to steer him to the area and find the,
understanding, but also interrupts the motion or
353
action, 348 what happens when the Word
Clearer has misunder
invented definition, example, 363 stoods on the
material being word cleared, 134
it is the earlier word or symbol which has caused the
what happens when the word that was misunderstood
stumble or twitch or blink or omit or mispronuncia-
is located, 131
tionorwhathaveyou, 128 where there is a
student reaction, a misunderstood
keeps a person from duplicating what the written
word will be found, usually just before the point he
materialsactuallysay, 129 reacted, 140
lacking a sense of organization lies below the level of
withholds and, 350, 387
Mis-Us, overts and withholds and PTSness, 330, 406
Word Clearer's Mis-Us, 134, 351
learn the full definition for a word as well as its syno-
word not reading on the meter because the person
nyms, 365 "thinks he knows," 367
made to look up words he understood, handling (in
MisunderstoodWordsbutton,
M9), 140 ensure nothing was suppressed,
invalidated or mis
Man has not necessarily properly defined everything
understood before leaving an unreading item, flow
in his technical sphere or culture, 349
or question, 253
misunderstood word or symbol in the definition, hand-
getting in Suppress, Invalidate and Misunderstood, 47
ling, 134 putting in Suppress, Invalidation or
Misunderstood
M9 brings about ability of student to find and clear
Words on the prepared list, 145
his own Mis-Us, 132 M9; see Word Clearing Method 9
nonoptimum reaction equals Mis-U, 133 Model Session, all
auditing actions except the CCHs are
nonoptimum reactions that may show up, 130 now
done in, 3
no organize and, 330 moneg; see price
no-product situations due to, 329 Money Processing Intensive,
what it handles, 271
not confronting and duplicating in an area due to, Mood
Drills,
330 50 Foot Mood Drills, 306
"not-understood" and, 363 handling if a mood is too
hard for the student to
"not-understood" word or symbol, example, 365
master, 305
organize, organize, organize due to, 330 procedure,
305
out of communiation due to, 130 when they should be
done, 306
overts and withholds stem from, 350 morale,
overts, withholds and, 387 achievement of one's
purposes and goals, high morale
pc had misunderstoods in auditing, handling, 69
and happiness, 374
pc had trouble in auditing because of misunderstoods,
getting roaring, high-morale production, 407
handling, 69 is up when competence is
demonstrated, 381
pc had trouble understanding an auditor, handling,
keepingthe course morale high, 382
69 low morale, cause of, 408
pc had trouble understanding what was going on in a
production and, 381
session, handling, 69 production is the basis of,
408
people who don't complete cycles of action on certain
shooting morale up, 429
subjects have a Mis-U on them, 329 twinning
and, 381
people who have no idea of concept get bogged into motion,
Mis-U interrupts not only the cycle of communi
terms and mechanics, 425 cation or
understanding, but also interrupts the motion
perception shut-offs due to, 329 or action, 348
person can go blank after he passes a word or symbol MU;
see misunderstood word
he doesn't understand, 130 multlple somatlc Items, do
we Triple or Quad them, 58
person is not duplicating the material he has studied
muscles, preventing sore muscles, 175
despite Word Clearing, handling, 371 muster, Course
Supervisor and, 224
person will not necessarily read on something that he
mutual rudlmenb between twins, 384
believes to be true, 371 M/W/H; see missed withhold
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
N not dones, reason for, 347
"not-understood," 363
Narconon, Purification Rundown and, 163 novocaine, 165
narrative(s), narrative running, "Now I'm supposed to's," 245
Drug Rundown narrative handling on drugs, 76 nulling and
F/Ning prepared lists, 144
prior assessment and, 22 nutrition(al); see also food;
vitamms
Natural Clear, body holding on to something it is short of,
170
a very few thetans have never been anything but Clear,
junk foods, 169
328 nutritional deficiencies, 170
checkouts to do before auditing Dianetic Clear or
Purification Rundown and, 169
Natural Clearon thegrades, 332 why overdosing
one vitamin can create a deficiency
Date/Locate and, 338 artificially of
another vitamin, 173
Quickie Grades and, 332 NVRD; see New Vitality Rundown
verifying the state of, 338
NED (New Era Dianetics); see Dianetics
NED (Rundown) for OTs,
auditor and Cramming assignment policies, 431
O
description, 268
Dianetic Clears and, 200
for person run on End of Endless Int while on OT III,
Objective(s), Objective Process(es)(ing),
190 Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear with unhandled
drugs is
is a prerequisite for OT VIII, 273
handled with Sweat Program and, 262
OT VIII and, 269, 273 definition of objective, 432
Second Wall of Fire, 268 do not work in the presence
of drugs, 165
when it can be given, 269 drug case and, 74
needle; see also various needle reactions by name Drug
Rundown and, 74, 78
all needleresponseisreactive, 2 new pc who
exteriorizes on Objectives and has not
how an incorrect can squee~e gives an inaccurate,
yet had a Dn C/S-1 or any NED auditing, handling,
unreliable needle reaction, 312 190
meter responds instantly, 2 Purification Rundown being
followed by, 178, 179
question or item aione changes the needle pattern, 320
TRs Course and, 437
question that stops a rising needle, 321 twinning
is mandatory on any Upper Indoc and Objec
nerve(s), tives Course, 379
drug damage to the, 178 undercut by Purification
Rundown, 179
magnesium and, 174 Objective ARC, Drug Rundown and, 74
nervous system, calcium and, 174 Objective Havingness, PTS RD and,
95, 126
New Era Dianetics; see Dianetics Obnosis Drills, twinning on, 379
newspaper, false data and, 368 obsessive attraction, what it is
based on, 93
New Vitality Rundown, what it handles, 274 OCA Test,
New World Corps, low due to unacknowledged state of Dianetic
Clear,
Mark VI E-Meter and, 275 256
requirements for, 267, 301 Purification Rundown and,
166, 176
niacin, ohms, definition, 45
allergies run out by, 173 oil,
background history, 172 diarrhea because of too
much oil, 170
breaks up and unleashes LSD, marijuana and other
exchanging good oil for bad fat in the body, 170
drugs and poisons from the tissues and cells, 172
four essential oils, 169
caution, 173 polyunsaturated oil, 169
curinginsanitywith, 172 PurificationRundownand, 169
deficiency brought about by drugs, 171 quantity needed
on Purification Rundown, 170
flush turned on by, 172 OK to audit,
increasing niacin and other vitamin quantities, 173
"Okay to Audit Int RD" form, 207
Purification Rundown and, 172 starrate checkouts for
"Okay to Audit Int RD," 206
Purification Rundown dosage, 171 onions, Vitamin C and, 171
radiation run out by, 172 Operating Thetan(s); see also OT
levels
skin cancer run out by, 173 are far easier and faster
to handle than non-OTs, 432
sunburn run out by, 172 C/S 53 reads and, 221
taken after a meal or with yoghurt or milk, 173
Dianetics is not run on, 191, 198
theory, 173 drugs reading on C/S 53, handling, 221
things that it may turn on, 173 End of Endless Drug
Rundowns Repair List and, 187
upset stomach or a fearful or terrified condition may
Expanded Green Form 40 RD and, 262
turn on with, 173 Green Form and, 262
Vitamin C increased in proportion to, 171 has not
had Int RD but Int reads on C/S 53, handling,
what it does, 172 220
what turns it on will turn it off where niacin is con-
Int RD and, 32, 43, 79,191,198, 212
cerned, 173 Int RD would not be run on an,
191,198
niacinamide is worthless, 172 Int Rundown Correction List
Revised and, 84
nlghtmares, Vitamin B1 and, 171 L3RF and, 144, 221
no case gain; see case gain make very fast and spectacular
gains, 432
Non-Interference Zone, Mark VI E-Meter and, 275
definition, 190 out-Int and, 213
End of Endless Int Repair RD and, 190 overrun on the
Clearing Course, 256
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Operating Thetan(s) (cont,) Original Assessment Sheet, Drug
Rundown and, 75
policy not to assign non-OT Cramming Officers to orlglnal
Items, nulling unrun original items on list with
OTs, 431 Suppress and Invalidate buttons,
77
pre-OTs; see pre-OTs OT; see Operating Thetan
PTS RD and, 91, 292 OT I, Dianetic Clear and, 252, 272
unhandled drugs on an OT, handling, 262 OT III, person
run on End of Endless Int while on OT
unresolving Int problems and, 32 III, handling,
190
why auditors of lower case level aren't assigned to pre-
OT VIII,
OTs, 431 prerequisite for, 269, 273
Op Pro by Dup, Drug Rundown and, 78 there are other OT
levels above VIII, 269
order(s), when upper levels above VIII will probably
be released,
cross orders, handling, 409 273
debugging orders, 402 other Intentionedness, handling, 415
How to Defeat Verbal Tech Checklist and, 402 OT level(s),
if it isn't written it isn't true, 402 Dianetic Clear
who hasn't truly made it will not make
illegal orders, handling, 410 it on the, 244
MUs on orders, handling, 403 grades really in
prevents pre-OT difficulties on the,
organization(s), Org(d) 332
Advanced Organizations; see Advanced Organizations
someone who has not made Clear will not make it on
area or individual creating problems and demanding
the, 200
solutions to them, handling, 405 there are other
OT levels above VIII, 269
areas where staff aren't studying regularly are, in most
when upper levels above VIII will probably be re
cases, the bugged and nonproducing areas, 428
leased, 273
building a sauna, 439 why the person has to learn to
audit himself on OT
Class VI Org (Saint Hill) services, 271
auditing, 272
courses Class IV Orgs teach, 271 OT Level Debug and Repair,
what it handles, 274
cracking the back of the most resistive nonproducing OT TR
0,
areas, 407 being able to do a faultless 2 hour OT
TR 0,143
debugging a lack of products and accomplishments of
cycling through TRs, 142
an org or post, 408 out-ethics; see also ethics
definition of Class IV Orgs, 269 agreed upon out-
ethics, 223
delivery; see delivery appearing to be no case gain, out-
ethics case due to
down statistic, handling, 8 being audited past
Dianetic Clear, 243
executives; see executives definition of in-ethics and
out-ethics course, 223
handling any insufficiency of viable products coming
divorce and, 223
from an, 401 group agreement in an out-ethics
course room, 223
how you get executives who will operate out-ethics,
handling, 405, 415
off-policy orgs, 224 how you get a gradually
lowered ethics level, 223
policywhen an SPisdiscoveredand declared in an, 6 how
you get executives who will operate out-ethics,
primary indicator of the presence of an SP in an, 8
off-policy orgs, 223
production; see production marriages and, 223
public; see public M/W/Hs and, 242
Saint Hill Organizations; see Saint Hill Organizations
O/W write-ups and, 405
services which Class IV Orgs can give, 271 student
involved in some sort of out-ethics situation,
situation where someone does not organize any corner
handling, 384
of his area or work or organizations or lines, hand-
outflow; see also inflow
ling, 406 balancing inflow with outflow in
twinning, 379
staff; see staff "stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he
can't outflow
statistics; see statistics the subject, 378
which never markets or advertises their products, 405 out-
Int; see interiorization; Interiorization Rundown
organize, organization (as an action), out-List(s), list errors;
see also wrong item
counting up the amount of wasted time simply because
auditing must be very limited if a list is out, 220
of the disorganization of a place, 402 cannot
audit over anything else if Int or L & N lists
do not go for an all-organize or an all-production
are out, 334
handling, 406 do not try to fly ruds or word
clear over out-Int or out inadequate organization to get the
product, handling, lists 423
406 L4BRA for list errors, 70
irrational demands to only produce, 330, 406 roller-
coaster due to, 92
lacking of a sense of, 406, 416 outnesses, reason people
apparently do not see, hear,
lack of a sense of organization lies below the level
notice or handle outnesses, 329
of MUs, overts and withholds and PTSness, 330,
outofvalence, handling, 68
406 out-rudiment(s),
misunderstoods resulting in organize, organize, orga-
audited with ruds out, handling, 61
nize, 330 crammed over out-ruds in the past,
handling, 422
no grasp of the concept of, 416 cramming and, 421
no organization, handling, 406 Cramming Officer must
not try to cram over out-ruds,
no organize and misunderstoods, 330 421
overts and withholds which prevent organizing, 330 False
Data Stripping and, 374
total organize, handling, 405 illness and, 24
total organize is an indicator of many misunderstoods
mutual out-ruds, 242
in the area, 405 restimulation caused by, 24
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
out-tech, overt product(s) (cont,)
M/W/Hs and, 242 subproduct can be an overt product and
block final
Quickie Grades and, 332 products, 402
trying to audit or rehab in an interview is, 333
overwhelm(ed)(ing),
out-TRs, by auditing, handling, 62
idea that one's TRs could go out overnight, 418 by
family connections, handling, 62
no reads on prepared lists as evidence of, 145 by
life, handling, 62
rabbiting caused by, 146 drugs and, 74
overrun(s), overrunning, engram running can easily
overwhelm sick pc, 92
all grades below Grade VII are subject to, 9 low TA
caused by overwhelming TRs, 149,152
Clearing Course overrun, 256 on post, handling, 62
ethics chit for overrunning a free needle, 5 O/Ws,
False Data Stripping and, 374 commands for handling
O/Ws in metered Crashing
F/N and, 5, 6, 9,149,152 MU finding, 350,
388
free needle vanishing and, 6 Crashing Mis-Us and,
350, 388
having to find whole track overruns on some pcs in False
Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W
rehabofgrades, 9 handling and service
facsimile tech must be em
high TA and, 44 ployed where needed in
checkouts, 375
hitting the purpose that was overrun, 7 handling
O/Ws in metered and nonmetered Crashing
Int overrun, commonest cause of, 194 MU
finding, 388
Int RD overrun, how it occurs, 79, 98,103,194 O/W
write-ups, 405, 415
Int RD overrun when pc exteriorizes and auditor con-
Oxford Capaclty Analysls; see OCA Test
tinues past exterior, 217 Oxford English Dictionary,
The, 182, 364
life can be an, 7
mechanism of overrun of life subjects, 9
never use a new process to cure an, 10
P
policy on rehabilitations, 6
purpose overrun, 9
rehabbing overrun grades, 9 Paid Completion Points for
Dianetic Clear Special Inten
rehab of life situations of overrun, 7 sive, 162
tackling the highest overrun first, 7 pain pills, 164
TA going up and, 9 past life, past lives,
TRs and "overrun?", 417 Clear in last life, 243
overt(s), overt act(s); see also O/Ws; rudiments Dianetic
Clear in past life, 243, 266, 268
asking for overts or withholds during nonmetered
invalidation of, 91
Crashing MU finding, 388 locating person's last
life folder, 268
audited over an overt, handling, 62 one should not
invalidate having known certain people
blows caused by, 34 before, 91
confessing one's overt acts is the first step toward
pc has been audited in an earlier life, handling, 64
taking responsibility for them, 225 people who
were only famous characters, 91
continuous overts; see continuous overts running
them as "imaginary," 91
Crashing MUs and, 387 using "I knew you when you
were____" for 2D
definition, 297 advantage, 91
helping person end cycle on the bad things he has we
discovered past lives, 275
done, 225 patch-up; see repair
justifying his overts by accepting false data, 370 pay,
raising staff pay, 429
lack of a sense of organization lies below the level of pc;
see preclear
MUs, overts and withholds and PTSness, 330, 406 pc
folder; see folder
misunderstood word or symbol and, 387 peace,
pc gives off another's overt in Confessional, handling,
antagonistic terminal seeking to make peace with the
247 PTS pc, 276
pc gives three or four overts at once in Confessional,
what productive peace is,14
handling, 247 penalty, penaltles,
person who has overts and withholds on a subject
auditors who miss withholds, penalty, 242
cannot perform in that area, 311 C/Sing for a
level for which he has not been trained,
power to forgive and, 225, 227 penalties for,
304
prone to accepting false data stems from, 370
declaring a Dianetic Clear "achieved in other prac
stem from Mis-Us, 350 tices," penalty for, 328
still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the un-
disciplining them for going past Mis-Us, 356
confessed overt or withhold, handling, 227
verbal tech penalties, 318
thought of one overt, but told a different overt, 227
penicillin,
why he began to commit overts, 311 antibiotics,
administering of, 156
overt product(s), bloodl eveling time, 157
Crashing Mis-Us and, 351 is growing less effective,
160
definition, 405 oral penicillin, workability of, 160
handling, 414 oral vs, injections, 160
has no exchange value, 404 procaine penicillin, 160
looking for overt products, 405 usually no good for
virus infections, 160
remedy of, 405 perception,
resources wasted by, 405 difficulties, 329
sector in which you most frequently get them, 330
misunderstoods can act as perception shut-offs, 329
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
permissiveness, disease of, 378 potential trouble source(s),
PTS(es)(ness); see also PTS
persistent F/N, Rundown; roller-coaster; Search and
Discovery;
effect of auditing over a, 280 Suppressed
Person Rundown
grades must not be delivered over a, 332 accidents
and, 415
leaving pc off auditing until persistent F/N dies down,
antagonistic terminal handled with Suppressed Per 277
son RD, 276
on a prepared list, handling, 71 auditing or training
must not be continued over an
persisting, how to get any unwanted persisting thing to
unhandled PTS situation, 290
vanish, 228 Can We Ever Be Friends? used in
handling PTS situa
personnel; see staff tions, 291
Peru, Bolivar and, 14 chronically ill person is always PTS,
124
penersions, technical, 303 coaching him along to see how he
himself actually
pesticides, 164,165,178 precipitated the PTS
condition, 291
philosophlcal, Socratic thesis-antithesis-synthesis philo-
Clay Table De-PTSing; see Clay Table De-PTSing
sophical equation, 369 C/S-1; see PTS C/S-1
physical Illness; see illness definition, 90, 299
physical universe, down statistic caused by SP or PTS
situation, 8
a life form is a combination of life itself and the, 166
educating the PTS, 293
handling disassociation between the definition and
flying ruds and overts Triple or Quad Flow on the
the, 412 antagonistic terminal, 292
picture(s); see also incident gains vs, 90
drugs turning on whole track pictures, 74 good
roads, good weather approach to the antagonistic
evaluating for pc by asking what his abilities are in
terminal, 290
relation to his mental image pictures, 338
handle or disconnect, 290
stuck picture; see stuck picture handling PTSness,
first thing you must do, 293
pinch test, procedure, 316 handling PTSness, outline of, 290
planet; see Earth handling PTSness, references, 291
plant, 256 handling PTSness, three stages of, 90
players fighting amongst themselves just to have a game,
handling the SP person or group and its relationship
19 in the real universe to the pc, 91
pneumonla, cycle of action of, 159 having known the
person before this life, 91
polson(s), toxin , toxic; see also drugs how pc goes the
effect of the antagonistic terminal, 276
calcium and toxic substances, 174 interview; see PTS
interview
flushing poisons and chemical substances out of the
interview by the Ethics Officer as a PTS handling, 90
body, 167 issues to be read by the PTS student
or pc, 295
intake of chemical poisons, 164 lack of a sense of
organization lies below the level of
nutritional deficiencies created by toxins and drugs,
MUs, overts and withholds and PTSness, 330, 406
171 manifesting PTSness and illnesses due to
being audited
remaining in the body for years, 165 past
Dianetic Clear, 243
restimulation caused by toxic substances, 166 only
PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can
policy; see also Hubbard Communications Office Policy
cause a roller-coaster, 91
Letter pc connected to someone hostile or
antagonistic to
auditor assignment policies, 431 Scientology,
handling, 63
Cramming assignment policies, 431 person PTS and
dramatizing creating problems during
political, Crashing MU finding, 390
how to bring about a great political reform or improve
person who roller-coasters is always PTS, 124
a failing country, 12 processing or study under
the duress of suppression
workable formula used "instinctively" by most suc-
will not produce results, 290
cessful practical political leaders, 12
program to handle the situation is given to the PTS
polyunsaturated oil, 169 person, 291
post(s), PTS C/S-1 must be done before any sort of PTS
inter
debugging a lack of products and accomplishments of
view, 294
an org or post, 408 putting him at cause over
the situation, 290, 296
having difficulty in an area or on a post, suspect false
references, 291, 293, 296
data, 368 rest, quiet and a safe environment fot
the PTS Type
not organizing any corner of his area or work due to
Three, 292
misunderstood words, 330 roller-coaster and,
90, 91,124
pc overwhelmed on post, handling, 62 roller-coaster
caused by, 90
posting known criminals or incompetents to training
rulesof, 124
posts, 303 rundown; see PTS Rundown
postulate(s), temporarily or momentarily PTS, 290
Clear's postulates read as a surge, 257 What Is
Scientology? book sent to antagonistic per definition, 297
son, 291
mean reputation pcs keep right on being mean until power(s),
they get the postulate off, 267 abandoning power
utterly is dangerous indeed, 20
time is basically a postulate or consideration, 230
auditing, power of, 244
'pot,' carbon vs, wire wound, 323 delegating power, 15,18, 20
potassium, don't ever feel weaker because you work for some
depletion of, 168,180 body stronger, 20
Purification Rundown and, 168 failures to remain a
power's power, reason for, 20
"salt substitute," 168 forgive, power to, 225, 227
potatoes, Vitamin C and, 171 how real powers are developed, 20
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
power(s) (cont,) preclear(s) (cont,)
how to live in the shadow or employ of a power, 20
leaving pc off auditing until persistent F/N dies down,
how to move off a point of power, 20 277
if you have power use it or delegate it, 20 letting pc
have his win, 277
one cannot hold power and not use it, 15 literal
rather than literate, 425
push power in the direction of anyone on whose power
low OCA due to unacknowledged state of Dianetic
you depend, 20 Clear, 256
seven things about power, 19 mean reputation, 267
Power Process(es)(ing); see also Super Power not continuing
up the Bridge on his grades, 166
alternate step to Power specially designed for Dianetic
not making it in auditing, check for drug or alcohol
Clears, 252 history, 75
Dianetic Clears are not run on, 252 originates he
has achieved Dianetic Clear, handling,
is for those who didn't go Dianetic Clear, 252, 267, 271
200
Super Power vs, 267 OTs are easier and faster to
handle than non-OTs, 432
practical, "overrepaired" pcs, usual cause of, 255
ask for instances of practical usage from the person
people who don't study, 428
you found a Crashing Mis-U on, 352 preparing
the majority of pcs for making optimum
mandatory twinning on all practical courses, 377
case gain, 164
twinning on practical courses, 378 pretending pc,
handling, 68
twinning on practical sections of courses, 379
receiving gains or benefits from being ill or disabled,
practices, exercises, handling, 63
declaring a Dianetic Clear "achieved in other prac-
running reading items, flows and questions is the only
tices," penalty for, 328 way to make a pc
better, 253
earlier practices, handling, 66 set-ups and C/S 53,
264
handling pc currently doing exercises, 66 shallow
running pc on Int RD, 213
handling pc doing some exercise between sessions, 67
stuck on the stuck flow of time, 212
pc has taken part in earlier electronic practices, hand-
uneducated pcs and C/S Series 53 Long Form, 220
ling, 67 uneducated pcs require flawless
topnotch auditors, 101
pc has taken part in earlier exercises, handling, 66
what is wrong with the pc is not known to the pc, I
pc has taken part in earlier scientific practices, hand-
when a pc is cogniting, look at the meter not the pc, 7
ling, 67 who can't move back on the time track
more than
pc has taken part in earlier spiritual practices, hand-
minutes, 212
ling, 67 who does not require a C/S 53 to
F/Ning list, 264
pc has taken part in earlier thought practices, hand-
who goes Ext in auditing being made to do the Hub
ling, 67 bard New Era Dianetics Course
before further
practitioner, why the individual practitioner breaks
auditing, 101
down, 7 why you only run what the meter says,
1
preassessment, Pre-Havingness Scale (Prehav Scale),
do not run preassessment or AESPs on Int, 104, 199
assessment procedure, 2
Drug Rundown preassessment procedure, 76 is a
picture of reactive thought, 1
prior assessment and, 22 why it is in the order it
is in, 1
preclear(s); see also case; individual; thetan pre-OT(s),
accept thepc's data during dating, 231 grades really in
prevents pre-OT difficulties on OT
asking pc not to say a word throughout the assess-
levels, 332
ment, 2 why auditors of lower case level
aren't assigned to, 431
attested to Dianetic Clear but hasn't made it, hand-
Prepared Assessment Form, what it handles, 267
ling, 257 prepared List(s); see also various prepared
lists by name
audited in an earlier life, handling, 64 any item
that would cause an F/N to "check" will be
auditor has more control over pc's reactive mind than
hot, 254
the pc, 2 assessment sheets must be placed in pc
folder, 391
auditor-pc assignment policies, 431 Auditing by List
procedure, 70
being someone else, handling, 68 auditor back-off or
protest on F/Ning a list, cause of,
blown pcs, handling with C/S 53, 220 146
body; see body auditor indicates when he has finished
with the, 72
consistently not making the expected gains from his
Bls present on the subject of repair or prepared lists,
processing, 166 handling, 214
Dianetic pc who has had drug handling omitted, hand-
BPC on improperly done or unnecessary prepared lists
ling, 75 or repair actions, handling, 214
difficult looking pc because of wrong sensitivity set-
calling the list complete when pc has a big win, 71
tings, 155 call questions without looking at the
pc, 70
dislikes talking to an auditor, handling, 61 correction
lists Cramming Officer must get checked
doesn't want auditing, handling, 61 out on use
of, 422
ethics trouble due to unacknowledged state of Dia-
Crashing Mis-U RepairList, form, 357
netic Clear, 256 C/S Series 53RL LF, form, 150
folder; see folder C/S Series 53RL SF, form, 147
former therapy, handling, 65 Debug Tech Checklist,
form, 408
free needles, how to get them on a pc, 9
definition, 144
goofing, how to handle pc who keeps on goofing, 63
Dianetic Clear Special Intensive Assessment List,
has not had auditing, handling, 64 form, 339
here for reasons not disclosed, handling, 62 do not
leave questions merely "clean," 71
if pc knows all about it, it isn't wrong with him, I
do not take up things that don't read, 71
Int repeatedly kicks in, handling, 189 dummy drilling
Auditing by Lists, 72
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
prepared List(s) (cont,) present time problem(s); see also
problem; rudiments
earlier similar, asking for an, 71 audited over a
problem, handling, 61
End of Endless Drug Rundowns Repair List, form, 187
breaks not taken during Int RD unless pc has a physi
EP of getting a prepared list to F/N, 222 cal
PTP, 41
errors that prevent the EP of getting a prepared list to
only a PTP will halt the progress of a case, 276
F/ N , 222 preservatives, food, 1 64,1 65 ,1 78
Expanded GF 40RD, form, 60 pressures, standard C/S for heavy
pressures, 33
F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if sensi-
pretending pc, handling, 68
tivity too high, 149, 152 price(s), pricing,
F/Ning a prepared list defined, 144 cost and selling
of Full Flow Dianetics, 59
F/Ning prepared lists, 144, 221, 254 cost of 1950-
1977 processing compared to NED, 265
F/N packs up during assessment, handling, 254
getting processing cheaply, 271
getting a suppressed read by not being able to read
reduction in course costs, 269
through an F/N, 145, 254 Saint Hill services
cost a bit more than Class IV Org
Green Form, form, 27 services, 271
Hi-Lo TA List Revised, form, 107 why Flag lower org
services cost more, 273
how auditor misses charged items and takes up un- Primary
Rundown, twinningon the, 380
charged items, 254 Primary Scale, assessment
procedure, 2
intending to F/N the list but the pc is on a big win, prior
assessment,
handling, 71 harmful "cures" handled by, 23
Int Rundown Correction List Revised, form, 84 Prior
Assessment to Drugs is only a partial handling,
LC1, form, 357 75
lists that are best done Method 3, 72 procedure, 22
lists that do not read F/N, 145 procedure on Drug
Rundown, 77
marking reads, procedure, 70 reads and, 22
maximum time between questions, 2 reads, order of
handling, 22
Method 3 assessment; see Method 3 when it is done, 22
Method 3 handlingof a list, 144 problem(s); see also
present time problem; rudiments
Method 5 assessment; see Method 5 area or individual
creating problems and demanding
mistaking an F/N right swing for a read, 149, 152
solutions to them, handling, 405
"nonreading, non-F/Ning" lists, 144 auditing over a
problem, effect of, 220
nulling and F/Ning prepared lists, 144 consists of two
or more purposes opposed, 279
pc protests a prepared list or repair action, handling,
definition, 279, 297
214 engaged in creating problems, 347
pc protest, upset or apprehension over extensive repair
lots of unsolvable problems in the area, handling, 415
actions or a list having to be F/Ned, main cause of,
person creating problems and demanding solutions to
146 them, handling, 415
pcs bugged by C/S 53s being done on them, handling,
person PTS and dramati~ing creating problems during
222 Crashing MU finding, 390
pc very upset and words of the Repair Correction List
problems grade is out, handling, 69
have not yet been cleared, handling, 214 Problems
of Work, TRs data and, 434, 436
pc volunteers some answer to an unreading question,
Problems Process(es),
handling, 71 commands, 280
persistent F/N on a prepared list, handling, 71 EP of
each reading flow of each Problems Process on
procedure for Auditing by Lists, 70 the
Suppressed Person RD, 278, 280
Product Debug Repair List, form, 391 references, 279
putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood R1-
11commands,288
Words on the list, 145 R2-20 commands, 288
rabbiting from F/Ning a list, 146 R2-71 commands, 284
reading through an F/N, procedure, 145, 254 process(es); see
also various processes by name
reasons a list does not F/N, 145 biophysical processes
do not work in the presence of
remains in the folder stapled to the worksheet, 70
drugs, 165
RepairCorrectionList,form,214 changing process while
TA shows good motion will
Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S, form, 147 leave
pc with BPC, 319
"That's clean" or "That reads" is not said to pc, 70
continuing a process that has ceased to produce change
unreading questions and items, 36, 71 is a
crime, 5
what to do if list reveals that more needs to be handled,
mental actions do not work in the presence of drugs,
144 165
what to do when an item stating pc has gone Dianetic
never use a new process to cure an overrun, 10
Clear reads on a, 333 processes a Clear wouldn't
respond to, 256
Word Clearing Correction List, form, 238 TRs are
not processes, 418
Prepcheck(ing), what leads to wild efforts, new processes
and anything
never prepcheck an item that doesn't read, 36
but cool standard procedure, 7
S & D and, 25 processing; see auditing
presence, session and social presence of a professional
product(s);see also production
auditor, 437 completed cycle of action
normally results in a, 347
present time; see also environment Crashing Mis-U may not
be on the subject of the prod Date/Locate to bring the pc to
PT, 83 uct itself but in an area related to the
subject, 362
out of present time, handling with Date/Locate, 228
Crashing Mis-U tech is used in debugging products,
pc out of PT fixed by both date and location, 236
348
stuck in the time of an incident which acts as PT for
Crashing MU and, 386, 387
him, handling, 228 debugging a lack of, 408
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
product(s) (cont, ) production, produce, producing (cont,)
debug tech being used until produets are now rolling,
craeking the baek of the most resistive nonprodueing
352 areas, 407
definition, 401 debugging produetion, 400
executives and, 408 demanding production, 402
finding a product that can be gotten out, 409 do
not go for an all-organize or an all-production
getting off the track and clearing up a whole subject
handling, 406
that has nothing to do with getting out his product,
exterior influence stopping production, handling, 404
356 getting roaring, high-morale production, 407
gettingout products, 405 if you don't know what
you're trying to produce it
getting products of the expected quality and quantity,
can'take forever, 437
352 increasing production, 429
getting the person producing the products he wasn't
inspecting an areafor products and, 401
able to produce before, 350 inspection to see what
is going on in terms of produc handling all the factors that
prevent the completion of, tion, 409
330 irrational demands to only produce, 330, 406
having no exchange value, handling, 414 is the
basis of morale, 408
how the distance between amateured junk and an
linkagebetweendrugsandproductiondifficulties, 164
effective product is accomplished, 326 list of
things that could be standing in the way of, 408
inadequate organization to get the product, handling,
lots of unsolvable problems in the area, handling, 415
406 morale and, 408
inspecting an area for products, 349 morale depends
on production, 381
inspection of, 401 overt products and, 330
insufficiency of viable products, handling, 401
people who have to have before they can do, 411
justifications for failure to understand a subject or in-
total organize is an indicator of many misunderstoods
ability to turn out professional products, 389
in the area, 405
key to completed cycles of action and, 347 with the
ability to learn comes stability and the produc Mis-Us causing no-
product situations, 329 tion of valuable products,
374
no idea at all that products should be gotten out, hand-
wrong stat, handling, 413
ling, 413 professional(s),
no idea of the product, handling, 414 art and, 346
no products, handling, 329, 348, 357, 402 be a
professional in whatever you do, 327
no products, reason for, 329, 347 becoming a, 326
org which never markets or advertises their products,
definition, 346
405 ideal scene and, 346
overtproduct;see overtproduct justifications for
failure to understand a subject or
people who don't get products have low morale, 408
inability to turn out professional products, 388
Product Debug Repair List, use of, 406 only thinks in
terms of getting out an actual product,
professionals and, 346 346
rules have everything to do with the value of the, 326
product and, 346
solution is not to immediately shoot them for not get-
rules and, 346
ting out the, 356 session and social presence
of a professional auditor,
still not getting out his products or completing cycles
437
of action in his area after Crashing Mis-U finding,
viewpoint of a, 346
handling, 357 what separates a member of the
audience from a, 346
subproduct can be an overt product and block final when
you have a, 326
products, 402 Profession Intensive, what it handles,
271
trying to turn out a product that has no exchange value,
program(s), programming (admin),
405 bugged targets and, 400
turning out a type of product nobody wants, handling,
debugging programs or targets, 400
405 evaluation and, 407
with the ability to learn comes stability and the pro-
linkage between drugs and difficulties with program
duction of valuable products, 374
execution, 164
wrong product, handling, 414 where the full tech on
how to execute and program
wrong VFP, handling, 414 is, 407
wrong VFP or wrong product, debugging a, 404 program(s),
programming (tech),
Product Clearing, assessing GF Method 5 and sending to
C/S for pro
anybody who thinks it's just an odd idea that you just
gramming, 261
follow the rules should get Short Form Product
biophysical processes do not work in the presence of
Clearing, 326 drugs, 165
debug tech and, 352 bringing the person up to the
level where he is now
Product Debug Repair List, ready for processing, 179
form, 391 cannot audit over anything else if Int or L
& N lists
Method 3 and, 391 are out, 334
purpose of, 391 Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear reading on
drugs on C/S
R/S turning on on the list, 391 53, handling,
221
use of, 406 C/S 53 as next action after Int RD or
End of Endless
production, produce, producing; see also products Int
RD, 197
areas where staff aren't studying regularly are, in most
C/S 53 reads, programming and handling of, 220, 221
cases, the bugged and nonproducing areas, 428
Dianetic Clears, what they can be audited on, 200, 252
busy busy busy and totally unaware of the fact that they
don't run anything else but Int when Int is out, and
were producing absolutely nothing, handling, 408
that includes two-way comm, 217
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
program(s), programming (tech) (cont,) psychologist(s),
End of Endless Int Repair Rundown, uses of, 190
belief that all life came from matter, 165
handling a student who cannot grasp or retain the
falsedataand, 435
data of the Data Series, 56 mission to make the
population into controllable zom
HC Out-point Plus-point Lists, use of, 300 bies,
435
Int Correction Lists have been done and pc still has
took longest toget through TRs Course, 435
headaches or other Int troubles, 100, 104
psychology,
Int RD error is corrected as a first action, 98
handling pc who had psychology therapy, 65
Int RD, if reading, is done before review auditing,
most false subject on the planet, 435
ruds or anything else, 42 PT; see present time
Int troubles persisting, handling, 100, 104 PTP; see present
time problem
Livingness Repair is often the first professional audit-
PTS; see potential trouble source
ing action taken on a person, 269 PTS C/S-1,
Ls, when they can be delivered, 274 definitions
sheet, 296
mental actions do not work in the presence of drugs,
must be done before any other PTS handling is begun,
165 290
NED Drug RD, who it is for, 186 must be done before
any sort of PTS interview, 294
NED for OTs, when it can be given, 273 procedure, 294
Objective Processing after Purification Rundown, 178,
PTS RD includes PTS C/S-1, 124
179 purpose of, 294
out-Int despite having had Int RD and it has been re-
R-Factor to give, 294
paired, handling, 190 study section, 295
out-Int, do not audit over out-Int, 190, 192, 217, 220,
what it does for the person, 290
334 who it can be done by, 294
out-list, auditing must be very limited if a list is out,
PTS Interview,
220 nonstandard actions or interviews forbidden,
432
pc exteriorizes in session but hasn't had an Int RD,
PTS C/S-1 must be done before, 294
handling, 38, 80, 99,105 references, 290
preparing the majority of pcs for making optimum
SPcannoteasilybefound, handling, 290
case gain, 164 what to do if difficulty is
encountered, 290
PTS handling, outlineof, 290 PTS Rundown; see also
Search and Discovery; Sup
PTS RD, when it is done, 292 pressed Person
Rundown
Purification Rundown and, 166, 167 avoid listing
the same question twice, 127
rundown that undercuts every case, 164 behavior of RD,
92
set-ups and C/S 53, 264 "can't have" and "enforced
have" defined, 94,126
substituting Suppressed Person RD for the engram case
conditions not previously remedied can be reme
part of the PTS RD, 276 died by, 92
Suppressed Person RD, when it is done, 277 check each
flow of each process for a read before it is
Suppressed Person RD, who it can be done on, 278, 292
run, 96
TRs Course prerequisite, 437 chronic somatics
handled by, 92
unreading flows and items are not run, 253 Clears,
OTs, Dianetic Clears and, 91, 291
progress; see case gain commands, 93
progress board, Purification Rundown and, 176 commands
for final step, 126
project(s), converting the PTS RD 2WCs for items into L & N
debugging projects, 407 questions, 127
debug tech and, 400 currently sick pcs should not be
run on, 92
Project Operators, bugged targets and, 400 development of,
91
promotion of Quad Dianetics, 55 do not run unreading flows,
126
protest(s)(ing), EP, 92, 292
auditor back-off or protest on F/Ning a list, cause
errors, 92-93,124
of, 146 errors in C/Sing and auditing it are
especially rough,
false read whenever Int is mentioned due to protest,
92
191 exteriorization is not the EP, 92
main cause of pc protest, upset, or apprehension over
final step, 126
extensive repair actions or a list having to be F/Ned,
flows, wording of, 92
146 four points of breakdown of the, 91
Method 5 and, 144 if pc does not recover, handling,
93
pc protests a prepared list or repair action, handling,
L & N for places and planets should be restricted to
214 planets only on VA pcs, 127
probable main reason for pc upset or protest against
notes, 127
"overrepair," 255 not restricted to Ex Dn, 92
protesting auditing, handling, 61 Objective Havingness
and, 127
TA up on a GF due to, 72 one should not invalidate
having known certain people
verifying that a read on Int is not a false read or pro-
before, 91
test read, 191 only reasons PTS RD does not
work, 124
when to check False and Protest during a Dianetic pc
gets ill or roller-coasters after the RD, handling, 97
Clear Special Intensive Assessment List, 339
prerequisites (for pcs), 92
psychiatrist, belief that all life came from matter, 165
procedure, 93
psychiatry, re-dos, 93
desperate measures and, 7 references, 90, 93
pc had psychiatric therapy, handling, 65 relapse
after PTS RD, handling, 125
people don't go Clear in garbage eating or, 328
remedies if PTS RD does not work, 124
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
PTS Rundown (cont,) Purification Rundown (cont,)
remedy for auditors who make errors on the, 125
length of program, 179
repair of, 96 letdown occurring after the, 178
S & Ds and, 90 liquids and, 168
set-up includes PTS C/S-1, 124 manifestations that
turn up on the, 175
set-up not complete, 92 Medical Officer okay
required, 177
substituting Suppressed Person RD for the engram
Medical Officer or medical doctor okay required, 167
part of the, 276 memory can return on the, 176
theory, 127 minerals and, 174
three stages of handling PTSness, 91 multi-minerals
and, 171
valence shifts and, 92 musters and roll calls, 177
when to run one, 92, 292 Narconon and, 163
who does it, 91 niacin and, 172
PTS/SP Detection, Rouffng and Handling Course, study no
medical recommendations or claims for it, 163
of the, 294 no medication of a medical nature
during the, 176
PTS Type Three, handling, 292 nutritional deficiencies
and, 170
public, nutritional failure slowing down the, 174
Intro Lecture and Group Processing for raw public,
nutrition and, 169
269 Objective Processing after the , 1 78 ,1 79
public services which Class IV Orgs can give, 269 OCA
and IQ Test and, 166
staff courses are not mixed in with public courses, 427
oil and, 169,170
Purification Program In Charge, duties of, 176
overheating in the sauna, 180
Purification Rundown; see also Sweat Program partner or twin
and, 168
additions, 180 persons it is mandatory for, 166
administration of the, 176 potassium depletion,
168,180
"All Blend" oil and, 169 product of this program,
178
always done under C/S supervision, 167 programming of,
166, 167
anemic and, 167,177 progress board and, 176
becoming more aware on the, 176 properly ordered
personal schedule and, 166,168
blood pressure and, 1 67,1 77 purpose of, 1 78
blood pressure test and, 177 release or quit claim
signed, 176
Cal-Mag and, 174 restimulation of an LSD trip turning
on, 175
Cal-Magdosage, 171 restimulation of past drugs can
and often does occur,
case gain and, 164 168
case supervision of, 166,177 rubberized or vinyl-
type sweat suit, when it is not used,
Case Supervisor and, 177 180
circulation and, 167 running is done on a daily basis,
180
cleaning up the fat tissue in the body, 170 running to
get the blood circulating, 167
cold showerand, 180 running to work up circulation
prior to going into
consequences starting to take on a new meaning, 176
sauna, 180
C/Sokaytobegintheprogramisrequired, 177 saltand,
168
daily reports and, 177 salt depletion, 168,180
definition, 164 "salt substitute," 168
diarrhea because of too much oil,170 sauna and,
164,168,180
diets not required, 169 sauna not available,
handling, 180
done 5 hours a day, 166,168,179 schedule and, 166,168
drug deposits inside cells, 170 showers and locker
rooms would be located near the
emotions that have been shut off may start to reappear,
sauna, 440
175 sleep and, 168
EP, 178 solution to any manifestation on the, 176
errata and additions, 180 steam baths vs, sauna, 181
eucalyptus oil and, 181 stupidity can be blown
through on the, 176
exchanging good oil for bad fat in the body, 170
summary, 179
exercise and, 167,180 supervision of the, 176
5-hour period is NOT 50% exercising and 50~o sauna,
Sweat Program replaced by, 163
180 temperature ranges in the sauna, 168
freeingtheindividualupspiritually, 163 tests continued
periodically as person goes through
getting too warm or feeling faint in the sauna, 180
program, 167
handling anyone not keeping to his schedule, 177 tests
done before the, 176
having a hard time spending consecutive hours in the
thin people and, 170
sauna, handling, 180 those who must do a program
of a much lower gradi
heart conditions and, 167 ent, 167
heat exhaustion and, 168 trips during the, 176
high blood pressure and, 167 TRs Course and, 437
how to build a sauna, 439 twinning up individuals on
the, 177
idea underlying the original Sweat Program, 165
undercut to all training and processing, 437
increasing niacin and other vitamin quantities, 173
vegetables and, 169
insect bites turning on, 175 vitamin and mineral
deficiencies checked for, 177
is for anyone, 164,166 vitamin rations would have to be
in proportion to one
is not a substitute for any kind of processing, 164
another, 174
is not done concurrently with auditing, 167 vitamins
and dosages to take, 171
kidney conditions and, 167 vitamins continued after
the, 178
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Purification Rundown (cont,) question(s) (cont,)
vitamins taken after meals or with yoghurt, 172
ehange of eharaeteristie question, 320
warning, 167 eheek questions, flows or items before
running any water and, 168,169 thing, 253
weak heart and, 167 fall follows at onee at the end
of the last word of the
weight ehanges and, 170 question asked, 320
what it ineludes, 166 getting one auditing question
answered before you ask
when it is done, 166 a seeond question, 248
purpose(s), pe volunteers some answer to an unreading prepared
aehievement of one's purposes and goals, high morale
list question, handling, 71
and happiness, 374 question or item aione
ehanges the needle pattern, 320
hitting the purpose that was overrun, 7 students
with questions, handling, 382, 427
overrun of, 9 subjeetive vs, objeetive questions or
aetions, 432
problem consists of two or more purposes opposed, 279
test questions for read before running them, 37
staff members are the most on-purpose Scientologists
unreading questions and items, 36
around, 427 unreading questions are not run,
253
Quickie Grade(s),
brought about by lack of Word
Clearing, 375
Q Dianetic Clear and, 332
out-tech and, 332
quiet types who have little or nothing to
say and speak
Quadruple Dianetics, softly, 303
all commands are used, 54 quit claim, Purification Rundown
and, 176
bringing all earlier Dianetie items into four flows, 57
cost and selling of, 59
C/Sing it, 53, 55 R
effect of suddenly beginning Quad without catching
the pc up, 53
Flow Zero is not run for the first time on Int, 47, 54,
rabbit(ing),
57,103, 201 buttons, 146
handling bogged and missing flows on the FFT, 54 cause
of rabbiting, 146
multiple somatic items, do we Triple or Quad them, 58
definition (verb), 145
offering the public FFD, 59 examples, 146
promotion of, 55 radiation, niacin and, 172
putting in Flow Zero, 53 RD; see rundown
rehab of a flow already run to EP, 53 Reach and Withdraw,
Crashing Mis-U finding and, 350
requirements for an auditor to run it, 55 reaction(s),
resultof, 55 examples of student reaetions and
eorreet handlings
rule on running Flow Zero, 53 on M9, 135
running the missing flows if reading, 57 nonoptimum
reaetion in M9 equals Mis-U, 133
shadowy remains of somatics blow with FFD, 59
nonoptimum reactions that may show up in M9, 130
unreading flows are not run, 253 "reaction flow" and
"re-reaction flow," 212
use of, 53, 57 suppressing reactions to Mis-Us, 131
warningaboutchainsthepcsaysaregone, 59 where there is a
student reaetion, a misunderstood
what happens when a flow not run on earlier items is
word will be found, usually just before the point he
run on later items, 58 reacted, 140
Quadruple Grades, reactive mind, bank,
Dianetic Clears and, 332 auditor has more eontrol
over pe's reactive mind than
what they handle, 270 the pe, 2
Qualifications Division, Qual, composed of mass, energy,
spaee, time and thought, I
Cramming assignment polieies, 431 E-Meter reaets only on
the, I
folder eheek before starting a eramming or other Qual
responds instantly on data a billion years ago, I
corrective action, 423 there is no time in
the, 2
had Qual corrective actions and has gotten worse or
reactivity, auditing is aimed at, 253
made no improvement, handling, 423 read(s), (ing);
see also E-Meter; various E-Meter reads
High Crime checkouts and, 375 by name
nattery about Qual correction actions or Qual, hand-
all needle response is reactive, 2
ling 421 always mark the read an item gave on
the worksheet, 37
protest of Qual corrective actions, 421 any item
that would cause an F/N to "cheek" will be
resistanee to Qual eorreetive aetions, 421 hot,
254
rules regarding worksheets apply to eramming and any
ARC broke meter that won't reeord a, 7
other Qual eorreetive aetions, 422 auditor
eannot make a prepared list read, reasons for,
SSO responsibility for standard staff eourses, 426
145
staff eourses in the Staff Seetion in Qual, 426 can
fiddle can fake or upset reads, 70
standard staff courses and, 426 change of
characteristic, 320, 323
teeh reeovery and, 5 eheek an item and flow for read
before running Reealls
Word Clearing requirements, 375 or engrams, 37
quarrels or upsets on M9, handling, 140 checking each flow for
a read before running it, 37, 96,
query, handling students with questions, 382, 427 253,
277, 280
question(s);see also commands check questions, flows or
items before running any
call prepared list questions without looking at the pc,
thing, 253
71 Clear's postulates read as a surge, 257
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
read(s), (ing) (cont,) read(s), (ing) (cont,)
commands to put in "Suppress" and "Invalidate," 37
"tick" or a "stop" is not a, 36
Confessionals and, 246 too low a sensitivity obscuring
reads, 154
C/S 53 reads, programming and handling of, 221
unreading flows are not run, 36, 96,126, 253
definition, 36 unreading flows, references, 253
Dianetic lists and, 36 unreading prepared list,
handling, 144
do not take up things that don't read, 71 unreading
questions and items are not run, 36, 253
do not tell pc what meter is doing, 70 using meter
reads to steer the person in False Data
don't audit things that don't read, 42 Stripping,
372
effect of having gone past many, many Mis-Us in using
the read to steer him to the area and find the
reading or education, 130 Mis-U, 353
fall follows at once at the end of the last word of the
verifying that you actually have a read on Int, 191
question asked, 320 what a read means, 253
false data preventing misunderstoods from reading on
what is a read, 36
the meter, 388 why a pc can have a broken leg,
yet it might not read,
false datum won't necessarily read because person be-
37
lieves it tobe true, 370 why you cannot run
anything not charged (reading),
false reads; see false reads 190
F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if sensi-
why you only run what the meter says, I
tivity too high, 149,152 why you run what
reacts-on the meter, 1, 253
gettingareadableandworkablemeter,316 word not reading
on the meter because the person
getting a suppressed read by not being able to read
"thinks he knows," 367
through an F/N, 145, 254 reading,
how an F/N can obscure a read, 254 Mis-U can
prevent a person from understanding the
how an incorrect can squeeze gives an inaccurate,
remainder of what is heard or written, 329, 347
unreliable needle reaction, 312 nonoptimum
reactions that may show up in M9, 130
how auditor misses charged items and takes up un- we
have drifted down in literacy to a point where the
charged items, 254 culture can't read or
hear, 128
how to read through an F/N, 145, 254 reality,
implant dates usually only give small reads, 230
charge and, 37
indicating L3RF reads to a Clear, OT or Dianetic
definition, 296
Clear, 221 importance of knowing how A and R and
C interrelate,
instant read; see instant read 436
Int button read on an MU, handling, 79,103 reads and,
37
Int buttons not reading, handling, 103 Recall(s), Recall
Process(es),
"latent reads" and sensitivity too high, 154 check an
item and flow for read before running, 36
longest read chosen in Dianetics, 22 False Data
Stripping recall step, how to avoid over
means there is charge present and available to run, 253
running it, 374
meter responds instantly, 2 key-outs and, 194
Method 9 on common reading materials, 132
liabilities and advantages of running Recalls on Int,
mistaking an F/N right swing for a, 149,152 213
misunderstood causing a read, handling, 47, 191, 198
use of Recalls is ideal in the handling of repair of Int,
never list a listing question that doesn't read, 36
213
never prepcheck an item that doesn't read, 36 using
the Recall system to run out-Int, 213
nevertellpcthatitreadordidn'tread, 72 recover, people who
don't go past track in Dianetics
"nonreading, non-F/Ning" prepared lists, 144 don't
recover, 91
no read after putting in "Suppress" and "Invalidate,"
recovery, tech, 5
37 reform, how to bring about a great political
reform or
no read auditors, reasons for, 145 improve a
failing country, 12
noted clearly in the worksheets, 335 Registrar selling
unnecessary Int RD, 80,105
order of handling Expanded Green Form 40RD reads, regret,
still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the
261 unconfessed overt or withhold,
handling, 227
"overrepaired" pcs are usually pcs with actual reads
rehab(s), rehabbed, rehabbing, rehabllltation,
missed and false reads taken up, 255 are not a
substitute for processes, 10
pc volunteers some answer to an unreading prepared can't
rehab a grade that hasn't been run, 10
list question, handling, 71 Dianetic Clear rehab,
272
person will not necessarily read on something that he
having to find whole track overruns on some pcs in
believes to be true, 371 rehab of grades,
9
prepared lists that do not read F/N, 145 importance
of rehabbing earlier grades, 5
prior assessment and, 22 Int RD and, 196
putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood life
situations of overrun, rehab of, 7
Words on an unreading prepared list, 145
needle goes dirty in a rehab session, handling, 10
question or item aione changes the needle pattern, 320
never use a new process to cure an overrun, 10
reality and, 37 no free needles show up on a case at
all, handling, 7
rings and finger jewelry causing unusual reads, 315
not doing well after an attempt to rehab the state of
running the missing Dianetic flows if reading, 57
Dianetic Clear, handling, 333
sensitivity too low or too high obscures reads and F/Ns,
out-tech to try audit or rehab in an interview, 333
315 overrun grades and, 9
test an item for read before prepchecking, 37
policy on rehabilitations, 6
"That's clean" or "That reads" is not said to pc, 70
rehabbing "from the top down," 7
things that don't read won't run, 37 tackling the
highest overrun first, 7
thinking beginning F/Ns are reads, 155 when to rehab a
Dianetic flow already run to EP, 53
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
release signed before doing Purification Rundown, 176 Resistive
Cases Assessment,
Relief Rundown, what it handles, 267 Expanded Green Form
40RD and, 60, 261
religion(s), Green Form and, 30
Confessionals and, 225 item reads on Resistive Cases
Assessment but not on
hell is an understatement of what really happens, 275
EXGF 40RD, handling, 261
pc has taken part in earlier religions, handling, 66
resourses, overt products waste resources, 405
remedy, remedles; see also repair responsibility,
all Dianetic remedies remain in full use, 55 cannot
take responsibility for his withholds and he is
for inability to locate the Crashing MU, 389 not
benefiting casewise from giving them up, 311
for PTS RD which does not work, 124 confessing one's
overt acts is the first step toward tak lnt RD is a, 105
ing responsibility for them, 225
Repair; see also prepared lists; remedy leaders,
responsibilities of, 11
auditor requirements to do an Int RD, correction, 80
low responsibility causing person to F/N, 247
BIs present on the subject of repair or prepared lists,
one is responsible for getting his twin through the
handling, 214 course, 381
BPC on improperly done or unnecessary prepared lists
SSO responsibility for standard staff courses, 426
or repair actions, handling, 214 taking
responsibility for one's fellow man, 378, 384
case who has had rough auditing, handling, 264
twins, responsibility of, 381
Crashing Mis-U finding, repair of, 356 we don't buy the
idea that everybody is totally irre
Dianetic Debug and Repair, 274 sponsible for
everybody else, 383
False Data Stripping and, 374 rest; see also sleep
faulty debugging, handling, 406 do not audit a pc who
has not had sufficient rest, 27
folder study and FES of the Int RD and any repairs PTS
Type Three needs rest, quiet and a safe environ
of Int RD, 190 ment, 292
how auditor misses charged items and takes up un-
restimulate(d), restimulation,
charged items, 254 cause of, 24
Int RD error is corrected as a first action, 98 drugs
and, 168
Int RD, if reading, is done before review auditing, ruds
LSD and, 165
or anything else, 42 LSD trip, restimulation of
an, 168,175
Int RD repair, 49,104 medicinal drugs have gone into
"restim" years after
Int RD repair, clue to, 100 they were taken,
165
Int repair, most flagrant cause of, 196 pc is
restimulated in current environment, handling,
Int repair, where much of it stems from, 196 62
OT Level Debug and Repair, 274 toxic substances
causing, 166
out-Int despite having had Int RD and it has been result(s),
repaired, handling, 190 auditor can't get
results without TRs, 420
"overrepaired" pcs, usual cause of, 255 Crashing
MU finding results, how to get them, 390
pc protests a prepared list or repair action, handling,
Flag runs on the basis of results or else, 273
214 flubs mar any auditing result, 41
pc protest, upset or apprehension over extensive repair
Full Flow Dianetics results, 59
actions or a list having to be F/Ned, main cause of,
NED auditor, what he has to know to get uniformly
146 good results, 210
pc run on Int RD by R3R or R3RA when he was a NED
results compared to old results, 269
Dianetic Clear, handling, 190 permissive TRs,
results of, 436
points a C/S should always look for in repairing cases,
processing or study under the duress of suppression
38 will not produce results, 290
probable main reason for pc upset or protest against
processing results attained on person who has been on
"overrepair," 255 heavy drugs vs, non-
drug person, 165
PTS RD repair, 96 Quad Dianetics and, 55
PTS RD which does not work, remedies, 124 speed that
NED pcs are achieving results, 265
"repair of repair of repair" of Int, handling, 190
technical results, what they depend on, 376
roller-coaster due to bad Int repair, 92 retrain, for
auditor who can't smoothly audit Int RD, 106
24-hour repair rule; see twenty-four repair rule retread,
use of Recalls is ideal in the handling of repair of Int,
cram or retread auditor who can't F/N a C/S 53, 222
213 when to retread a Dianetic auditor, 52, 54
Repair Comction List, when to retread an auditor, 52
form, 214 return,
Method 5 and, 214 definition, 259
pc very upset and words of the list have not yet been
revivification differentiated from, 259
cleared, handling, 214 review(s),
use of, 214 Green Form is used for general review,
70
represented, item "me" must never be represented, 237 Int
RD vs, review auditing, 42
resistance, Review Section,
mental mass and, 45 handling bogged students and
their twins, 384
TA actually measures resistance, 45 if one twin goes
to Review or Ethics the other goes,
resistive case(s), 381, 382, 383, 384
drug case is one of the, 73 revivification,
drugs or alcohol make a, 74 definition, 259
EXGF 40RD handles resistiveness of pc's case, 262 End
of Endless Int Repair Rundown and, 259
Green Form and, 30 return differentiated from, 259
still appears resistive after GF, handling, 261 rewards,
payment of, 13
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
R-Factor, Routine 3RA (cont,)
Confessionals and, 246 command for asking for earlier
incident in narrative
for person wanting to attest to Dianetic Clear but
handlingondrugs, 76
hasn't made it, 257 command for earler
beginning, 48
for person who attested to Dianetic Clear but hasn't
command for earlier incident, 48
made it, 257 command (running item list
question for Drug Run
Int RD Correction List R-Factor, 86 down), 76
Int RD two-way comm R-Factor, 38 commands for Int RD,
47
PTS C/S-1 R-Factor, 294 Dianetic Clear,
adjudication and declare of the state
Suppressed Person Rundown and, 277 of, 200
when doing a Date/Locate, 232, 233 Drug Rundown
procedure in full, 75
right, earlier beginning; see earlier
beginning
glowing things right, 12 earlier incident; see
earlier incident
job of the coach and Supervisor is to make the student
erasure; see erasure
right, 143 Int running with R3RA, 48
making himself right and others wrong, 389 narrative
handling on drugs, procedure, 76
pc concerned about being right or wrong, handling, NED
auditor must understand the function and pur
69 pose of each of the R3RA commands in a
Dianetic
ring(s), session, 210
R/S and, 321 references to study and demo out what
each R3RA
unusual reads caused by, 315 command does,
210
rite(s), repairing pc run on Int RD by R3R or R3RA when he
handling pc currently practicing, 66 was a
Dianetic Clear, 190
pc has taken part in earlier Eastern rites, handling, 67
R3RA audited over and beyond Dianetic Clear as a
pc has taken part in earlier rites, handling, 66
primary reason for case bogs, 189
robotic, understanding the basic laws of the time
track and how
glib student on M9 sounds and looks robotic when he
R3RA commands handle and control the time track,
reads, 131 210
Mis-Us causing one to become a, 130 what has to be
run for a chain or incident to erase, 212
never go robotic or rote on M9 procedure, 140 Routine 6
End Words (R6EW),
student reading like a robot and suppressing every-
definition, 272
thing, handling, 131 Dianetic Clear is not run
on, 252
rock slam(s), what it does, 272
definition, 321 R/S; see rock slam
dirty needle will turn into an R/S or will fully clean,
rudiment(s), ruds; see also ARC break; missed withhold;
247 overt; problem; present time problem;
withhold
evil intention and, 321 commands for life ruds, 25
loose connection in the leads or meter causing, 321
commands for PTS RD use, 94
Product Debug Repair List and, 391 commands to fly
ruds in cramming, 421
reported to Ethics Officer, 391 Confessional end ruds,
249
reporting and noting of, 248 Cramming Officer must
get checked out on flying ruds
rings causing, 321 and overts, 422
speck of dust in the 'pot' causing, 323 do not try
to fly ruds or word clear over out-Int or out valid R/Ses are not
always instant reads, 249 lists, 423
what it means, 321 don't need a C/S to fly
somebody's ruds, 422
width of a, 321 False Data Stripping and, 374
Rodriguez, Slmon, 13 flying ruds and overts Triple or Quad
Flow on the
roll book, 427 antagonistic terminal, 292
roller-coaster(s); see also potential trouble source
flying ruds in cramming, 421
bad Int RD causing, 92 Green Form when ruds won't fly at
start of session,
bad Int repair causing, 92 261
BPC causing, 92 Int RD and, 40, 42, 46
cause of, 90 mutual out-ruds, 242
causes of (besides PTS), 92 mutual rudiments between
twins, 384
definition, 90, 298 out-Int and, 192
out-lists causing, 92 out-ruds; see out-rudiments
person who roller-coasters is always PTS, 124 rule(s),
PTS RD EP is a pc who is getting and keeping case have
everything to do with the value of the product,
gains and never again roller-coasters, 292
326
Ron's Journal 30, 265, 301 professional knows the, 346
rote, why we follow the, 326
Confessional is not a rote procedure, 247 rundown(s),
never go robotic or rote on M9 procedure, 140
Auditor Rundown, what it handles, 270
"round robin," 383 Bright Think Rundown HCOBs
withdrawn, 260
R1-11, commands, 288 Drug Rundown procedure in full,
75
R2-20, commands, 288 End of Endless Drug Rundowns
Repair List as a, 185,
R2-71, commands, 284 187, 266
Routine 3R, repairing a pc run on Int RD by R3R or End of
Endless Int Repair Rundown, 189
R3RA when he was a Dianetic Clear, 190 Fixated
Person Rundown, what it handles, 271
Routine 3RA; see also chains; engram; engram running; for
beating an illness to death, 25
incident; narrative New Vitality Rundown, what
it handles, 274
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
rundown(s) (cont, ) saunu (cont,)
Purification Rundown, 163 size of, 441
set-up for Flag RDs, what it must include, 264
source of heat to be used, 441
Student Booster Rundown-a fast study remedy, 273 steam
baths vs, 181
Suppressed Person RD, 271, 276, 279 stones, 443
that undercuts every case, 164 sweating in the, 168
running, sweat suit is never worn in the, 168
gradient and, 167 temperature range, 168
partner or twin and, 168 type of heat source to be
used, 439
Purification Rundown and, 167,180 ventilation, 446
rubberized or vinyl-type sweat suit and, 180 what to do
when a sauna is not available for the Purifi
running Item(s); see also Dianetic item cation
Rundown, 180
Drug Rundown and, 77 what to wear in the, 447
running item list question (Drug Rundown), 76
wiring, 446
running things In auditing; see auditing say or ask, when not
to use it, 339
schedule(s),
Purification Rundown and, 166,168
S staff study schedules, 427
schools, glibness is often trained into
students by the
current educational methods used in
schools, 131
sad, "Feel Sad" = ARC break of long duration, 148, 152 Science of
Survival, Theta-MEST theory and, 165
sad effect, auditing over an ARC break puts pc in sad scientific
practices, pc has taken part in earlier scientific
effect, 220 practices, handling,
67
Saenz, Manuela, 11, 16 Scientologist(s),
Saint Hill Organlzation(s), becoming inactive as a
Scientologist due to being
how they came about, 271 audited past
Dianetic Clear, 243
services cost a bit more than Class IV Org services, 271
Clear in last life, 243
services given at, 271 staff members are the most on-
purpose Scientologists
where they are located, 271 around, 427
Saint Hill Special Brlefing Course, what happens on it,
Scientology,
272 discoveries and advancements in tech in
1978, 266
salt, handling illness in, 24
depletion of, 168, 180 organization; see organization
"salt substitute," 168 primary targets in our technology
for anyone seeking
salvaged, what really happens to a thetan who is not sal-
to mess it up, 6
vaged or processed and goes on down the route, 275
public; see public
S & D; see Search and Discovery staff; see staff
sauna, technology; see technology
additional safety measures, 447 we discovered past
lives, 275
advisable not to fall asleep in the, 181 we operate
on the Third Dynamic, 384
benches, 446 What Is Scientology?, 251
cold shower and, 180 What Is Scientology? answers
questions about, 275
curing the, 447 what success in clearing this planet
depends upon, 224
definition, 439 what we're salvaging people from, 275
door recommended for the, 446 Scn; see Scientology
dry sauna vs, wet sauna, 168 scurvy,
eucalyptusoiland, 181 traditionalremedyfor, 171
exercise and, 180 Vitamin C deficiency and, 171
finishing of the walls, 445 Search and Discovery; see also
PTS Rundown; Sup
foundation and flooring, 445 pressed Person
Rundown
getting too warm or feeling faint in the, 180
commands, 25
having a hard time spending consecutive hours in the,
definition, 299
180 item "me" must be accepted on any S & D
list, 237
how to build a, 439 prepchecking any item that does
not F/N, 25
how to take a, 447 procedure for three S & Ds, 25
hygiene, 447 PTS Rundown and, 90, 93
insulation, 445 still valid, 90
jewelry removed before going into the, 447 3 S & Ds
procedure for PTS RD, 95
location of the, 439, 440 Secondary Scale, assessment
procedure, 2
one for men and one for women, 447 Second Dynamic,
overheating in the, 180 cheating on your spouse,
223
prefabricated saunas, 447 husband/wife auditing
teams, possible reason they
Purification Rundown and, 164,168,180 often
fail, 242
reference books giving further data, 447 marriage
and out-ethics, 223
running and, 167, 180 using "I knew you when you
were_____" for 2D
running to work up circulation prior to going into
advantage, 91
sauna, 180 what obsessive attraction is based on,
93
salt depletion symptoms, 168 Second Wall of Fire, 268
scrubbing the room at least once, or oftener, daily, 181
Security Check(s)(ing); see also Confessional
shower before and after, 447 auditors who miss
withholds, penalty, 242
showers and locker rooms would be located near the,
change of characteristic is followed up if it is instant,
440 322
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Security Check(s)(ing) (cont,) set-up(s) (cont,)
ethics presence and, 242, 250 C/S 53 and, 264
Sec Checking, Integrity Processing and Confessionals
major actions and, 264
are all the same procedure, 245 most thorough
way to set up a case, 264
self-auditing, handling, 64 PTS RD and, 92
selling Full Flow Dianetics, 59 what it consists of, 264
senior(s); see also executive shallow running pc on Int RD, 213
responsible for ensuring juniors are studying, 428 shame,
still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the
who don't make their juniors study, 428
unconfessed overt or withhold, handling, 227
sensitivity, shock treatment, pc had electric shock, handling,
65
convulsive or incorrect can squeeze, effects of, 154
Shorter Oxford Dictionary, 182
E-Meter Drill 5RA-Can Squeeze, 312 Short Form Product
Clearing; see Product Clearing
errors, 154 shut-off(s),
F/N can be obscured and mistaken for a read if sensi-
misunderstoods can act as perception shut-offs, 329
tivity too high, 149,152 somatic shut-off due
to drugs, medicine or alcohol, 22
F/Ns and, 6, 9, 149, 152, 154, 315 sickness; see illness
importance of getting the correct sensitivity setting
sight; see eyesight
for each pc at each session, 315 significance, getting
into a lot of think-think and unnec
is different for almost every pc and can change, session
essary significance, 330
to session, even for one pc, 154 simplicities, slmple,
"latent reads" and sensitivity too high, 154 all
fundamental discoveries are essentially simple ones,
procedurefordeterminingthe, 4, 312, 319 50
reads obscured by sensitivity too low, 154, 315 why a
person cannot get down to a subject's basic
set for 1/3 of a dial drop on the can squeeze, 4, 9, 70,
simplicities, 311
155, 312, 315, 316, 320 Single Dianetics,
setting sensitivity at the beginning of each session, 4
putting in Flow Zero on a Single pc, 53
there is no set sensitivity for a pc at any grade level, 4
running the missing flows if reading, 57
too low vs, too high, 6, 9, 154, 315 sins, power to
forgive, 225, 227
sentences, how long to use the word in, 133, 182 sinuses,
eucalyptus oil and, 181
service(s), skill, making far too heavy use of a skill simply
because
Advanced Org services, 272 it is easy, 12
Class IV Org courses, 271 skin cancer, run out by niacin,
173
Class IV Org services, 269 sleep; see also rest
Class VI Org (Saint Hill) services, 271 advisable
not to fall asleep in the sauna, 181
Flag services, 273 Purification Rundown and, 168
prices; see prices smoking in the course room, 224
why Flag lower org services cost more, 273 society; see
culture
service facsimilie(s); see also defense mechanism Socrates, thesis-
antithesis-synthesis philosophical equa Crashing MU and, 389
tion, 369
definition, 389 sodium chloride; see salt
engrams and, 389 Solo auditing,
False Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U tech, O/W OT
Level Debug and Repair, what it handles, 274
handling and service facsimile tech must be employed
why the person has to learn to audit himself on OT
where needed in checkouts, 375 auditing,
272
justifications are cousins to, 389 Solo Auditors Course,
pc has service facs, handling, 69 Advanced Orgs and, 272
references, 389 taking lower levei professional
auditor courses before
the most universally present aberration of making
the, 272
others wrong, 307 solution(s),
session(s), frailty of single solutions, 12
auditor seated closer to the door, 246 lots of
unsolvable problems in the area, handling, 415
breaks; see breaks unusual solution; see unusual
solution
common denominator of flunked video TR sessions, solvency,
solvent,
435 debug tech and, 401
complete any Int RD flow on any reading button in don't
leave an enemy financed and solvent while you
one session, 40, 48 let your friends
starve, 14
how the earliest session blows the later sessions, 58
somatic(s),
Int RD session rules, 40 auditing past exterior
causing, 43
meter position while Auditing by List, 70 multiple
somatic items, do we Triple or Quad them, 58
pc doing some exercises between sessions, handling, 67
shadowy remains of somatics blow with FFD, 59
pc had trouble understanding what was going on in a
shut-off due to drugs, medicine or alcohol, 22
session, handling, 69 SOP 8C, Drug Rundown and, 78
sensitivity can change, session to session, even for one
sound shut off by Mis-U words, 329
pc, 154 source, twin always refers his fellow
student to source
session and social presence of a professional auditor,
materials, 383
437 South Amerlca, Simon Bolivar and, 11
start of session; see start of session SP; see suppressive
person
when pc exteriorizes in session it is the EP for that
spaceshlp, Hylan, 231
process or action, 80, 99, 105 spasms, calcium and,
174
set, readjusting the needle to set, 312 Special Rundown, 274
set-up(s), spectatorlsm, 378
Advanced Orgs and, 272 spells, handling pc who has cast
spells, 67
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
spiritually, freeing the individual up spiritually, 163 staff
course(s) (cont,)
spiritual practices, handling pc who has taken part in
getting staffcourses attended, 427
earlier spiritual practices, 67 putting staff
courses there, 426
spot-checking, schedules, 427
definition, 133 SSO responsibility for, 426
example, 136 standard staff courses are mandatory,
426
squirrel(ing), Staff Course Admln, 427
suppressively validating squirrel practices or groups by
Staff Course Supervlsor, 427
stating they are producing Dianetic Clears, 328 Staff
Section, staff courses in the, 427
where it stems from, 7 Staff Section Officer,
SSO; see Staff Section Officer authority of the SSO
regarding staff study, 428
stability, with the ability to learn comes stability and the
getting executive support in maintaining regular staff
production of valuable products, 374
study, 427
staff (member), personnel, purpose of, 426
absence of altitude, handling, 412 responsibility
for standard staff courses, 426
absence of hatting, handling, 411 responsibility of ED
to make sure that an SSO is
area or individual creating problems and demanding
posted, 426
solutions to them, handling, 405 what Ron would
do as an SSO, 429
areas where staff aren't studying regularly are, in most
standard technology
cases, the bugged and nonproducing areas, 428
Class VIII Course and, 272
are the most on-purpose Scientologists around, 427 how
it slips down to "some of the tech being applied
busy busy busy and totally unaware of the fact that they
when we can," 223
were producing absolutely nothing, handling, 408
nonstandard actions or interviews forbidden, 432
can't get out the products expected of him, handling,
what leads to wild efforts, new processes and any
408 thing but cool standard procedure, 7
conditions contributory to staff not studying, 427
Shnlslavsky, Konstantin, 368
counter-intention, handling, 415 starrate checkout; see
checkout
creating problems and demanding solutions to them, start of
session,
handling, 415 Green Form when ruds won't fly at
start of session,
day staff vs, Foundation staff study schedules, 427
261
debugging personnel problems, 403 high TA due to
"audited over exterior," 32
doesn't attend study, handling, 411 setting
sensitivity at the beginning of each session, 4
don't ever feel weaker because you work for somebody
state, letting pc attest to a state he achieved, 258
stronger, 20 statlstlc(s), stat(s),
how to live in the shadow or employ of a power, 20 down
statistic, handling, 8
inability to communicate, handling, 412 DTS stat
for completion of Dianetic Clear Special
lack of interest or no interest, 410 Intensive,
162
lack of organization, handling, 416 failing to
recover after an SP is spotted in a depart
lack of technical know-how, handling, 412 ment,
handling, 6
list of things that could be standing in the way of pro-
only active suppression can drive a stat down, 8
duction, 408 plummeting HGC Completion
Statistic, 5
no idea at all that products should be gotten out,
raisingstats, 429
handling, 413 rising statistics do not continue
rising for long in the
no idea of the product, handling, 414 face of
neglected hatting and training, 429
not organizing any corner of his area or work due to
SPs and, 6, 8
misunderstood words, 330 "upstats" is no excuse
to not study, 429
other-intentionedness, handling, 415 wrong stat,
debugging a, 404, 413
out-ethics, handling, 405 steam bath,
people who don't get products have low morale, 408
eucalyptus oil and, 181
people who don't study, 428 sauna vs, 181
people who have to have before they can do, 411 steer,
person who cannot be hatted at all has false data, 403
using meter reads to steer the person in False Data
push power in the direction of anyone on whose power
Stripping, 372
you depend, 20 using the read to steer him to
the area and find the
raising staff pay, 429 Mis-U, 353
responsibilities of leaders, 11 stomach,
scarcity of personnel, handling, 411 upset stomach or
a fearful or terrified condition may
schedules for study, 427 turn on with niacin,
173
senior who doesn't make sure his staff puts in study
Vitamin C causing stomach problems, 171
time off production hours, 403 vitamins causing
stomach burn, 172
situation where someone does not organize any corner stop
is not a read, 36
of his area or work or organizations or lines, hand-
Straightwlre,
ling, 406 False Data Stripping and, 370
solution is not to immediately shoot them for not get-
locks and, 370
tingoutthe product, 356 removed locks and
released illnesses without the pc
SSO responsibility for standard staff courses, 426
ever having run an engram, 370
staff courses are not mixed in with public courses, 427
when overdone it can key in underlying engrams, 370
won't complete a cycle of action, handling, 413 why
it is called Straightwire, 370
staff course(s), streptomycin, 157
are not mixed in with public courses, 427 stuck,
checksheets must exist for, 427 Date/Locate used to
handle stuck points, 228
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
stuck (cont,) student(s) (cont,)
getting the exact "when" and "where" will unstick
talking or goofing off during course hours, 224
him, 228 teach students to a win, 308, 310
pc stuck in the time of an incident which acts as PT
teaming up students of comparable case level and
for him, handling, 228 ability, 378,
380
still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the un-
those who find study difficult, handling, 267
confessed overt or withhold, handling, 227
training at cause vs, training at effect, 379
stuck viewpoint in time, handling, 229 twin must have a
misunderstood himself if he missed
stuck viewpoint of location, handling, 229 the
other student's goof, 381
stuck flow, twinning on a turn-about basis, 380
blowing the stuck flow of "going in," 196 twinning,
what it does for students, 378
dissolving the obsessive stuck flow of going in (on Int
twin word clears his fellow student, 381
RD), 213 when to twin, 379
Int is a compound of stuck flows and prior incidents,
where there is a student reaction, a misunderstood
212 word will be found, usually just
before the point he
pc stuck on the stuck flow of time, 212
reacted, 140
"stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he can't outflow
StudentBoosterRundown, a fast study remedy, 273
the subject, 379 Student Correction List, what it
handles, 270
time itself can be a, 212 study(ing); see also courses;
student; training
stuck picture(s), areas where staff aren't studying
regularly are, in most
handling, 116 cases, the bugged and
nonproducing areas, 428
having him recall a time before it and recall a time
auditing or training must not be continued over an
after it, 116 unhandled PTS situation,
290
student(s); see also study; training conditions
contributory to staff not studying, 427
abandoning one's twin, 381 courses-their ideal scene,
223
answers to students' questions, 382 Course
Supervisor who lets students study without
balancing inflow with outflow, 379
dictionaries and demo kits, 224
becoming much more aware of and able to find and day
staff vs, Foundation staff study schedules, 427
handle his own misunderstoods, 132
dictionaries, names of those recommended, 182
blown student is recovered by his twin, 381, 382
doesn't attend study, handling, 41 1
blown students, handling with C/S 53, 220 executive
responsibility for ensuring juniors are study cannot grasp or
retain the data of the Data Series, ing, 427
handling, 56 he cannot think with the data and
it does not seem to
Course Supervisor who lets students study without dic-
apply, handling, 371
tionaries and demo kits, 224 how to clear a
word, 182
disciplining himself not to go past misunderstood
inability to learn and apply, handling, 374
words, 366 Mis-U can prevent a person from
understanding the
examples of student reactions and correct handlings
remainder of what is heard or written, 329, 347
on M9, 135 morale and, 381
F/Ning students, 385 participation and action levels
brought up by twinning,
glibness; see glibness 378
handling bogged students and their twins, 384
people who don't study, 428
handling students with questions, 427 "permissive"
teaching, 378
handling the extensively mistrained glib student, 132
person backing off from applying data he is studying
how he goes into agreement with and contributes to
despite standard Word Clearing, handling, 371
an out-ethics course room, 223 person is not
duplicating the material he has studied
inability to learn and apply, handling, 374
despite Word Clearing, handling, 371
late for course, 384 person who has overts and
withholds on a subject can
may not be certified and may not be given a course
notperforminthatarea, 311
completion until he has completed his twin, 381
processing or study under the duress of suppression
morale and production, 381 will not produce
results, 290
musteringstudents, 224 reason for people not studying is
always misunder
not getting students through their course and gradu-
stoods, 428
ated, penalty for, 224 senior who doesn't
make sure his staff puts in study
one is responsible for getting his twin through the
time off production hours, 403
course, 381 "stuck flow" phenomenon whereby
he can't outflow
out-ethics situation and, 384 the subject, 379
participation and action levels brought up by twinning,
subjects; see subjects
378 texts, choosing of, 368
permitting persons to come into the course room and
there is no field in all the society where false data is
bother students for any reason is not allowed, 224
not rampant, 367
producing causative, responsible graduates who can
thosewhofind study difficult, handling, 267
apply what they have learned, 382 turn-about
system described, 380
reading like a robot and suppressing everything, hand-
twinning on practical sections of course, 379
ling, 131 twinning reinstated, 377
responsibility of twins, 381 "upstats" is no excuse
to not study, 429
slow student, handling, 267 when he can't seem to apply
what he has "learned,"
"stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he can't outflow
suspect false data, 368
the subject, 379 when to twin, 379
Supervisor checks up on any students who have been why
trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
routed off course, 385 on the subject
does not work, 369
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Study Green Form, what it does, 270 Supervisor; see Case
Supervisor; Course Supervisor
study tech, Course Supervisor not fully applying study Supervisor
Intensive, what it handles, 270
teeh and using Word Clearing, 224
suppress(ed)(ion)(ive),
stupidity, definition, 298
curing him of his additives, complexities, apathy and
examples of suppressive acts, 303
apparent stupidity on a subject, 370 getting a
suppressed read by not being able to read
Purification Rundown and, 176 through an F/N,
145, 254
subject(s), how suppression works, 276
asking for his withhold on the subject during Crashing
Mis-Us, suppressing reaetions to, 131
Mis-U finding, 350 most illness is
preeipitated by, 271
ehoosing a text on a, 368 only aetive suppression ean
drive a stat down, 8
Crashing Mis-U may not be on the subjeet of the pe
who has been suppressed by another, handling, 63
produet itself but in an area related to the subject,
processing or study under the duress of suppression
362 will not produce results, 290
Crashing MU is a MU that crashes a subject and
restimulation caused by out-ruds plus a suppressive
crashes a person, 387 environment or
situation, 24
Crashing MU totally blocks person's understanding of
student reading like a robot and suppressing every the subject,
387 thing, handling, 131
curing him of his additives, complexities, apathy and
suppressed physical condition and person on drugs,
apparent stupidity on a subject, 370 drink
or medicine, 22
examples of false texts, 368 Suppress button,
getting off the track and clearing up a whole subject
command, 37, 247
that has nothing to do with getting out his product,
ensure nothing was suppressed, invalidated or mis 356
understood before leaving an unreading item, flow
how his thinkingness locks up on the subject, 369
or question, 253
justifications for failure to understand a subject or
getting a suppressed read by not being able to read
inability to turn out professional products, 388
through an F/N, 145, 254
mechanism of overrun of life subjects, 9 if
Suppress or Invalidate reads, handling, 247
no Crashing Mis-Us can be found on a subject yet it is
no read after putting in "Suppress" and "Invalidate,"
obvious they exist, handling, 371, 386, 387
37
people who don't complete cycles of action on certain
nulling unrun original items on the list with Suppress
subjects have a Mis-U on them, 329 and
Invalidate buttons, 77
person giving reasons why it is OK not to understand
putting in Suppress, Invalidation or Misunderstood
the subject or area, handling, 388 Words
on the prepared list, 145
person who has overts and withholds on a subject when
toputitin, 42
cannot perform in that area, 311 Suppressed Person
Rundown,
psychology is the most false subject on the planet, 435
all Problems Processes must be run on the antagonistic
sources of false data on a subject, 368
terminal, 278
"stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he can't outflow
antagonisticterminal handledwith, 276
the subject, 379 checking each flow for a read
before running it, 277,
there is no field in all the society where false data is
280
not rampant, 367 commands for Problems Processes,
280
untrainable on the subject due to false data, 435
dominant operating action of this RD, 279
why a person cannot get down to a subject's basic EP,
276, 277, 278, 280, 292
simplicities, 311 EP of each reading flow of
each Problems Process on
why a person has a tendency to complicate a subject,
the RD, 278, 280
311 first and most vital action to begin the,
279
why getting off false data on a subject works, 369
handles the other person connected to the pc, 91
why trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
HCOB on, 276, 279
on the subject does not work, 369 how it
works, 276
withholds on a subject, effects of, 388 how long
it is continued, 276
subjective, important not to underrun the, 277
definition, 432 magical new rundown, 276
TRs are not a "think" action nor a subjective action,
metering and, 278
433 only time it doesn't work, 277, 278, 280
subproduct(s), persistent F/N and, 280
can be an overt product and block final products, 402
procedure, 277
how to compile a subproducts list, reference, 405
references, 279
successes, judging oneself by one's successes breeds con-
result it produces, 276
fidence in one's ability, 15 R-Factor given
to pc, 277
sulfadrugs, 159 substituting it for the engram part of the
PTS RD,
sulfathiazole, 160 276
sunburn run out by niacin, 172 target of this RD, 278
Super Power, what it handles, 271
description, 267 when the RD is done, 277
Dianetic Clears and, 252, 271 who it can be done on,
278, 292
for a student who cannot grasp or retain the data of
suppressive groups, definition, 298
the Data Series, 56 suppressive person(s),
New World Corps and, 267 cycle of action and, 404
Power Processing vs, 267 definition, 298
requirements for auditors or C/Ses to be trained to
denying do and enforcing unwanted do, 127
deliver it, 301 denying Hav and enforcing
unwanted Hav, 127
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
suppressive person(s) (cont,) Teacher or Supervisor Intensive,
what it handles, 270
handling the SP person or group and its relationship
technology, technical; see also materials
in the real universe to the pc, 91 all
Dianetic remedies and general technology remain
offenses that can result in a Course Supervisor being
in full use, 55
declared SP, 224 all of it remains very valid, 275
plummeting statistic and, 8 auditors who misapply tech,
how you get them, 223
policy when an SP is discovered and declared in an
changing or losing issues, 303
org, 6 crime to alter and pervert tech or
procedure to prevent
primary indicator of the presence of an SP in an org, 8
discovery of withholds, 303
primary targets in our technology for anyone seeking
debug tech; see debug tech
to mess it up, 6 discoveries and advancements in
tech in 1978, 266
PTS Type Three and apparent SPs, 292 exact
application depends on complete understanding,
references, 293 376
seeking peace without ever having been contacted, 271
HCOBs; see Hubbard Communications Office Bulle
statistic failing to recover after an SP is spotted in a
tins
department, handling, 6 if it isn't written it
isn't true, 317, 402
statistics and, 5, 6, 8 issuing issues in BTB or
BPL form that contain in Suppressed Person RD and, 276
correct and misleading data, 303
suppressive act to send pc through to attest to Dia-
lack of technical know-how, handling, 412
netic Clear when he hasn't truly made it, 244
Man has not necessarily properly defined everything in
tech statistic and, 5 his technical sphere or
culture, 349
when an SP dominates an area, only ethics actions can
only source of technical data is LRH HCOBs, books
handle, 8 and tapes, 417
why his case doesn't improve, 8 out-tech; see out-tech
why SPs are SPs, 127 perversions, 303
suspended certificate until auditor is retreaded, 52
primary targets in our technology for anyone seeking
sweating, sauna and, 168 to mess it up, 6
Sweat Program; see also Purification Rundown recovery of, 5
Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear with unhandled drugs is
results, what they depend on, 376
handled with Objectives and, 262 standard tech;
see standard tech
Drug Rundown and, 75 verbal tech; see verbal tech
for Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears with drugs reading
why this technical culture is failing, 128
on C/S 53, 221 works when it is applied exactly,
376
idea underlying the, 165 temperature,
incompleteonthe, 166 getting the temperature subnormal
with antibiotics,
Purification Program replaces the, 163 156
references, 75 glass of water or cigarette before
temperature taking
sweat sult, gives a false report, 157
is never worn in the sauna, 168 lowered temperature,
what it means, 157
rubberized or vinyl-type, 167,180 rising temperature,
what it means, 157
symbol(s), what normal temperature is, 157
misunderstood word or symbol and overts and with- tension,
high, 174
holds, 387 terminal, how he snaps in and becomes the,
245
misunderstood word or symbol defined, 363 testing,
Purification Rundown and, 176
misunderstood word or symbol in the definition, hand-
textbook(s),
ling, 134,183 examples of false texts, 368
"not-understood" word or symbol, example, 365 false
data and, 368
synonym(s), finding a whole textbook false, 368
clearing of, 134,183 used to clear up a misunderstood,
366
definition, 129, 365 which ones to choose, 368
learn the full definition for a word as well as its syno-
therapy,
nyms, 365 handling former therapy, 65
synthesis, definition, 369 L, Ron Hubbard as an early
discoverer and instigator
syphylis, cure of, 159 of vitamin therapy, 170
thesis, definition, 369
Theta-MEST theory, Science of Survival and,
165
T thetan(s); see also being; case;
individual; Man; preclear
a life form is a combination of life
itself and the physi cal universe,
166
TA; see tone arm a very few thetans have never been anything
but Clear,
talking, pc dislikes talking to an auditor, handling, 61
328
tanglefoot, 425 fact which disproved that Man was an animal,
211
tapes, only source of technical data is LRH HCOBs, judging
oneself by one's successes breeds confidence
books and, 417 in one's ability, 15
target(s), one is what one is, not what one is admired
or hated
bugged targets, 400 for, 15
debugging programs or, 400 proof of the existence of
a, 44, 211
teach(ing); see also study; training proof that Man is a
spiritual being, timeless and death "permissive" teaching, 378
less, 211
teach students to a win, 308, 310 toxic substances in
the body causing restimulation, 166
why trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
what really happens to a thetan who is not salvaged or
on the subject does not work, 369
processed and goes on down the route, 275
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
think(ing), thinkingness; see also thought Touch Assist, out-Int
and, 192
false data clogs up ability to think and learn, 374
toxin(s), toxic; see poison
he cannot think with the data and it does not seem to
track; see time track; whole track
apply, handling, 371 training; see also checkouts;
course; Course Supervisor;
how thinkingness locks up on a subject, 369
drills; internship; student; study; teaching; TRs
inability to think with data, reason for, 368
answers to students' questions, 382
TRs are not a "think" action nor a subjective action,
balancing inflow with outflow, 379
433 cause vs, effect in training, 379
think-think, misunderstoods and, 330 course failures
because twinning had fallen into mis
Third Dynamic, we operate on the, 384 use or fallen
out completely, 377
thought, pc has taken part in earlier thought practices,
courses Class IV Orgs teach, 271
handling, 67 courses-their ideal scene, 223,
224
tick(s), C/S doing the training and cramming because
there
is always noted, 246 is no Qual Staff Training
Officer or Cramming, 106
is not a read, 36 factors missing in modern
permissive education, 378
too low a sensitivity making reads look like, 154 False
Data Stripping and, 368
time, False Data Stripping solves the problem of
inability to
can be a stuck flow, 212 hat or train, 368
counting up wasted time because of disorganization,
getting training cheaply by taking the training route,
402 271
gettingstuckonthestuckflowof,212 how you get executives
who will operate out-ethics,
is basically a postulate or consideration, 230
off-policy orgs, 224
no absolute system for measuring time, 230 inability
to learn and apply, handling, 374
proof that Man is a spiritual being, timeless and death-
incomplete course is not allowed by Supervisor, 385
less, 211 inflow and, 379
stuck in the time of an incident which acts as PT for
late for course, 384
him, handling, 228 making the seemingly
untrainable trainable, 437
stuck viewpoint in time, handling, 229 mandatory
twinning on all practical courses, 377
systems for measuring time, 230 must not be continued
over an unhandled PTS situa
that which is viewed in its own time, place, form and
tion, 290
event can be as-ised, 228 participation and
action levels brought up by twinning,
there is no time in the reactive mind, 2 378
two incidents collapsed into one, time-wise, handling,
"permissive" teaching, 378
228 person must be at cause when he is expected
to apply
time track; see also whole track knowledge or skills,
379
pcs who can't move back on the time track more than
posting known criminals or incompetents to training
minutes, 212 posts, 303
understanding the basic laws of the time track and
pretendingtraining not attained, handling, 68
how R3RA commands handle and control the, 210
prices; see prices
tissue(s), processing or study under the duress of
suppression
all people have some fatty tissue, 170 will not
produce results, 290
cleaning up the fat tissue in the body, 170 producing
causative, responsible graduates who can
drugs can lodge in the, 165 apply what they have
learned, 382
getting rid of the accumulation of biochemical de-
reduction incoursecosts, 269
posits, 167 rising statistics do not continue
rising for long in the
LSD lodging in the, 165 face of neglected
hatting and training, 429
niacin breaks up and unleashes LSD, marijuana and SSO
responsibility for standard staff courses, 426
other drugs and poisons from the tissues and cells,
"stuck flow" phenomenon whereby he can't outflow
172 the subject, 379
toxic substances tend to lock up mainly in the fat
student may not be certified and may not be given a
tissue, 170 course completion until he
has completed his twin,
tone arm, 381
false TA pcs bugged by C/S 53 being done on them,
Supervisor checks up on any students who have been
222 routed off course, 385
floating TA; see floating TA teaming up students of
comparable case level and
high TA; see high TA ability, 378
low TA; see low TA texts, choosing of, 368
resistance is measured by, 45 turn-about system
described, 380
tone arm action, tone arm motion, twinning on practical
courses, 379
changing process while TA shows good motion will
twinningreinstated, 377
leave pc with BPC, 319 undercut to all
training and processing, 437
noted clearly in the worksheets, 335 untrainable on
the subject due to false data, 435
tone level(s), when he can't get through a specific drill
or exercise
changing a chronic tone level, 305 in his
training materials, suspect false data, 368
handling fixed, uncontrolled or unsuitable tone levels
when person comes to apply the tech, he is already
in an auditor, 305 able to outflow if he
was trained using twinning,
tooth, teeth, 379
pc has tooth decay, handling, 64 when to twin, 379
problems due to Vitamin B1 taken without calcium, why
trying to teach a correct datum over a false datum
175 on the subject does not work, 369
Vitamin C and, 161, 174 tranquilizers, 164
touch shut off by Mis-U words, 329 transgression,
individuation and, 245
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
trip(s), TRs (cont,)
during the Purification Rundown, handling, 176 once
an auditor's TRs are in, they are in, 418
LSD and, 165 once an auditor's TRs are "IN" they
don't go out, 302
restimulation of an LSD trip, 168, 175 once his TRs are
"in" they will stay in for life, 143
Triple Dianetics, outnesses, handling, 435
do we Triple or Quad multiple somatic items, 58 out-
TRs, see out-TRs
fourth flow is never suddenly introduced on Int if pc
"overrun?" and, 417
has been run on Triples, 54, 57 "pat-a-cake"
TRs, 418, 419
putting in Flow Zero on a Triple pc, 53
"permissive TRs," 420
running the missing flows if reading, 57 permissive
TRs, results of, 436
TRs, preliminary step to drilling TRs, 435
ARC and, 435 procedure, 142, 417-420
ARC triangle and, 435, 436 reactive body motions and,
419
are drills on the various parts of the comm formula,
reasonTRsaredone, 142
435 references, 433
are not a "think" action nor a subjective action, 433
rough or choppy TRs in Confessional make pc feel
are not processes, 418 accused, 250
auditor attitude and TRs during a Confessional, 250
session and social presence of a professional auditor,
auditor can't get results without TRs, 420 437
auditors not required to "drill TRs" in the morning
should sound live and interested and natural, 305
or evening as TRs do not fall out, 309 smooth TRs
get you free needles, 10
auditors whose TRs are out, handling, 302 student
hangs up or fails on a later TR, handling, 419
basics resurrected, 433 study of the theory upon
which the TRs are based, 434
basics underlying the, 434 teaching of, 433, 436
being able to do a faultless 2 hour TR 0, 143 the
true data on communication and, 435
being who can handle anyone with communication
twinning is mandatory on any Upper Indoc and Objec
alone, 437 tives Course, 378
blinking and, 418, 419 understanding the use of, 435
cancellation of destructive BTBs and BPLs on, 417
valuable final products of, 437
challenging or accusative attitude, 353 video-
taped TRs, 433
checking an auditor's TRs in Cramming, 418 way to
master TRs, 436
coaches and, 418, 419 why TRs are done, 434
coaching TRs, 143 wins and, 142, 309, 418
coach to wins, not losses, 436 Word Clearing Method 9
and, 140
common denominator of flunked video TR sessions,
wriggling around, moving, fidgeting and, 418
435 TR 0; see also confronting
communication cycle and, 143, 435 being able to do a
faultless 2 hour TR 0, 143
communication formula and, 435 "blinkless TR 0,"
definition, 419
cycling through TRs, 142, 307, 308, 419 cycling
through TRs, 142
cycling through TRs, new definition, 419 excessive
blinking and, 419
"dailyTRs," 419 manifestations that show that a person
is not con definition, 435 fronting, 418
definition of TRs the Hard Way, 436 TR 1,
dirty needle caused by bad TRs, 10 cycling through
TRs, 142
doingness, TRs are a, 433 evidence that auditor has
no impingement with TR 1,
each button is flattened before it is left, 436
145
EP, 437 Mood Drills and, 305
false data and, 434 TR 2; see also acknowledgements
False Data Stripping to correct TR outnesses, 435
cycling through TRs, 143
flunks and, 436 poor or comm lag TR 2 in a
Confessional, effects of,
getting an honest TRs tape passed by competent au-
250
thority before he audits anybody, 302 TR 3, cycling
through TRs, 143
good auditor gets case gain on a pc on his TRs and TR 4,
cycling through TRs, 143
comm cycle aione, 420 TRs Course, Hard TRs Course,
gotten in by drilling them hard, 433 ability to
confront and communicate are brought about
gradients in TRs, 142, 418 on the, 307
Hard TRs Course; see TRs Course ARC triangle and, 434
Hard TRs make an auditor, 436 cancellation of
destructive BTBs and BPLs on TRs,
Hard Way TRs, 419, 420 417
Hard Way TRs vs, permissive TRs, 436 Change the
Civilization Eval and, 307
HAS Course vs, Hard TRs, 436 checksheet for the TRs
Course which is studied before
how long TRs are drilled, 418 the student does
his TRs, 308
I can get somebody through TRs in three days, 420
communication formula in clay as the beginning part
idea that interns and auditors do daily TRs, 418
of, 434
idea that one'sTRs could go out overnight,418
confront tech has to be part of the TR checksheet,
importance of knowing how A and R and C inter-
311
relate, 436 definition of TRs the Hard Way,
436
low TA caused by overwhelming TRs, 149, 152 drug case
and, 74, 437
"Major Stable Win" and, 418 Drug RD and, 74, 437
manifestations that show that a person is not con- EP,
437
fronting, 418 failing auditors and, 309
Mood Drills and, 305 fast, successful TRs Courses, 143
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
TRs Course, Hard TRs Course (cont, ) twin(s), twinning (cont, )
Hard TRs Course as an Academy prerequisite, 418 puts
students into communication, into doingness and
issued very soon in unalterable book form, 434
participation, 378
length of time to do a, 418, 420 reasons for, 378
mandatory twinning on the, 377 responsibility of
twins, 381
mild TRs Course in Division 6, 434 "round robin,"
383
new TRs Course at the beginning of major courses, 309
rule of, 380
no auditor may audit in an HGC who has not done a
Supervisor's responsibility to enforce twinning, 382
HardTRsCourse, 302 teaming up students of
comparable case level and
Objectives and, 437 ability, 378, 380
omitted checksheet, 434 turn-about system
described, 380
out-basics, 434 turning a twinship into a trio, 383
prerequisite, 437 twin always refers his fellow
student to source materi preventing horrible slows on, 435
als, 383
psychologists took longest to get through, 435
verbal data and, 382
Purification Rundown and 437 what twinning does,
378
references on Hard TRs Course, 76 when person comes to
apply the tech, he is already
time it takes to do one, 437 able to outflow
if he was trained using twinning, 379
twinning is mandatory on, 379 when to twin, 379
when it comes to making auditors, there is no sub- why
twinning is so vital, 378
stitute for Hard TRs, 434 Word Clearing and, 379
truth, true, Word Clearing Method 9 and, 378, 379, 380
as-isness and, 228 two-way communication(s),
doesn't bruise very easily 275 auditor requirements
before being allowed to do any
if it isn't written it isn't true, 317, 402 two-
way comm, 104
person will not necessarily read on something that he
converting the PTS RD 2WCs for items into L & N
believes to be true, 371 questions, 127
"Try not to be three feet back of your head," 212 Dianetic
Clear Special Intensive and,335
turn, what turns it on will turn it off, 172 don't run
anything else but Int when Int is out, and
turn-about system, 380 that includes two-way comm, 217
TV, false data and, 368 EP of all two-way comm sessions,
41
twenty-four hour Repair rule, Int RD two-way comm session
must follow Int RD by
Crashing Mis-U finding and, 356 not less than a
day nor more than a week, 41
False Data Stripping and, 374 Int RD two-way comm
was omitted or not in a separate
twin(s), twlnning, session, handling, 38
abandoning one's twin, 381 on Int and Ext, 33, 38
assigning twins, 379, 380 procedure for two-way comm
on Int-Ext, 38
background, 378 2WCing the C/S 53 itself, 222
balancing inflow with outflow, 379 2WC; see two-way
communication
blown student is recovered by his twin, 381, 383
brings people out of their First Dynamic and onto the
Third, 378
bugs on, 383 U
cancellation of issues cancelling twinning, 377
courses twinning is mandatory on, 379
definition, 377 undercut,
done on a "turn-about" basis, 380 rundown that undercuts
every case, 164
"double flunk," when it is given, 382 to all training
and processing, 437
E-Meter Drills and, 378, 379 understand(ing),
essence of, 379 ARC and, 435
failure of a twin to be a twin, handling, 382
clearing a word to full conceptual understanding, 183
"games condition" and, 382 complete understanding
depends on freedom from
gets students extroverted, 378 misunderstood
words, 376
gets students to take responsibility for their fellow
conceptual understanding, 133,183, 425
man, 378 Crashing Mis-U and cycle of
understanding, 348
handling bogged students and their twins, 384
Crashing MU totally blocks person's understanding of
if one twin goes to Review or Ethics the other goes,
the subject, 387
381, 382, 383, 384 cycle of action and cycle
of understanding, 348
if one twin should blow, the other twin must go and
detecting if he has or hasn't got the Crashing Mis-U
get him, 381 cleared up, 352
if the twin has missed the student's goof, he must have
exact application depends on complete understanding,
misunderstoods of his own, 382 376
morale and, 381 justifications for failure to
understand a subject or
mutual rudiments between twins, 384 inability
to turn out professional products, 389
one does not musical chair twins, 379 misunderstood
words; see misunderstood words
one is responsible for getting his twin through the
person giving reasons why it is OK not to understand
course, 381 the subject or area,
handling, 388
participation and action levels brought up by, 378 when
words are understood, communication can'take
permissive teaching vs, 378 place, 184
practical courses and, 377, 379 universe; see physical
universe
Primary Rundown and, 380 unusual solution(s),
Purification Rundown and, 177 Case Supervisor and, 7
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
unusual solution(s) (cont,) Vitamin B1 (cont,)
definition, 6 Cal-Mag balaneing out the, 175
poliey on, 6 delirium tremens and, 171
Upper Indoc, twinning is mandatory on any Upper Indoe LSD
burns it up, 171
and Objeetives Course, 379 nightmares and, 171
upset(s), Purifieation Rundown dosage, 171
auditing past exterior eausing, 43, 98 teeth problems
due to Vitamin B1 taken without cal
pc protest, upset or apprehension over extensive repair
cium, 175
aetions or a list having to be F/Ned, main eause
VitaminB2forstomaehandboweleomplaints, 161
of, 146 Vitamin C,
probable main reason for pe upset or protest against
creating a deficiency in C by administering B and
"overrepair," 255 calcium, 1 74
quarrels or upsets on M9, handling, 140
deficiencies result in scurvy, 171
deficiency brought about by drugs, 171
deficiency characteristies of C, 174
V diarrhea ean be eaused by, 171
for helping eolds and infeetions, 161
for sore teeth or gums, 161
valence, PTS RD and valenee shifts, 92 inereased in
proportion to the niaein given, 171
valuable final product(s), "live C" from raw onions or raw
potatoes, 171
debugging a wrong VFP or wrong produet, 404
Purifieation Rundown dosage, 171
of TRs, 437 stomaeh problems eaused by, 171
wrong VFP, handling, 414 teeth and, 161, 174
vegetables, Purification Rundown and, 169 trips during
Purifieation Rundown handled with, 176
verbal data, verbal tech, Vitamin D, Purifieation Rundown
dosage, 171
auditors who give and aeeept verbal data, how you get
Vitamin E, Purifieation Rundown dosage, 171
them, 223
eategories whieh eonstitute verbal teeh, 318
Course Supervisor and, 382
handling, 410 W
how to defeat verbal teeh, 317, 402
How to Defeat Verbal Teeh Cheeklist, 402
penalties for, 318 war only brings anarehy, 14
referenees, 382 water, Purifieation Rundown and, 168,169
teehnieal perversion and, 303 W/Cing; see Word Clearing
twinning and, 382 welght ehanges on the Purifieation
Rundown, 170
verbal hatting is the main souree of false definitions well
done, Full Flow Table is done in auditor's admin
and false data, 367 time for well done
time eredits, 54
very good Indicators; see good indieators W/H; see withhold
VFP; see valuable final produet "What could you say?", 61
video taped TRs, 433 What is Scientology?
viewPoint, answers questions asked about Seientology, 275
stuek viewpoint in time, handling, 229 deseription, 251
stuek viewpoint of loeation, handling, 229 sending a
eopy to antagonistie persons, 291
vinegar,calciumand, 175 what turns it on will turn it off, 173
virus, wheat rust, 165
definition, 156 whole track, backtrack; see also time traek
germ infeetions and virus infeetions, 156 drug ease
seldom goes baektraek well, 73
penieillin is usually no good for virus infeetions, 160
drugs turning on whole traek pietures, 74
Vitamin(s); see also nutrition pc consistently immediately
dives whole track on Con antibiotics and, 158,161
fessional questions, handling, 248
cheeking for vitamin and mineral deficiencies before
people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't
Purifieation Rundown, 177 recover, 91
continued after the Purification Rundown, 178 whole
track drugs not asked for on Drug RD, 186
increasing niacin and other vitamin quantities, 173
whole track system of measuring distanee, 231
inproportion to one another, 173 Why Finding, auditor and
Cramming assignment poli
L. Ron Hubbard as an early discoverer and instigator
cies, 431
of vitamin therapy, 170 Why Finding Drill-Two,
cancellation of, 304
taken after meals or with yoghurt, 172 wife, possible reason
husband/wife auditing teams often
why overdosing one vitamin can create a deficiency
fail, 242
artifieiallyofanothervitamin, 173 win(s),
Vitamin A, Purifieation Rundown dosage, 171 bypassed wins on
grades, handling, 69
Vitamin B Complex, calling the prepared list complete
when pc has a big
creating a deficiency in C by administering B and
win, 71
calcium, 174 foremost law, if one's ambition
is to win, is of course
deficiency brought about by drugs, 171 to win, 18
LSD burnsitup, 171 giving pc an appropriate
acknowledgement on his
Purification Rundown dosage, 171 win, 258
trips during Purification Rundown handled with, 176
how to have them as a C/S, 106
Vitamin B1, intending to F/N the list but the pc is on a big
win,
alcohol vs, 171 handling, 71
antibiotics and, 161 letting pc attest to a state he
achieved, 258
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
win(s) (cont,) Word Clearing (cont,)
letting pc have his win, 277 bogs, handling, 238
teach students to a, 308, 310 can be more than one
F/N per word, 184
TRs and, 142, 309, 418 can't find a useful definition,
handling, 354
witchcraft, handling pc who has practiced, 67 clearing a
word must end in an F/N and VGIs, 184
withdrawnl Dymptoms, Hard TRs Course and Objectives
clearing a word to full conceptual understanding, 133,
to handle, 74 188, 425
withhold(d)ing); see also missed withholds; O/Ws commonest
error in, 366
audited over a W/H, handling, 62 consequences of no
Word Clearing, 375
auditing over a withhold, effect of, 220 Course
Supenisor not fully applying study tech and
auditor missing a withhold, what it stems from, 242
using Word Clearing, 224
auditors who miss withholds, penalty, 242 Crashing
Mis-U finding vs, regular W/Cing, 349
Crashing MUs and, 387 definition of a cleared word, 183
crime to alter and pervert tech or procedure to prevent
derivation of word is cleared, 182
discovery of withholds, 303 detecting if he has or
hasn't got the Crashing Mis-U
definition, 297 cleared up, 352
dirty needle caused by, 10 dictionaries, names of
those recommended, 182
effects of withholds on a subject, 388 disassociation
between the definition and the physical
fatal to miss a withhold on someone, 390
universe, 412
games conditions and, 245 do not try to fly ruds or
word clear over out-Int or
if pc not in session you won't get the, 250 out-
lists, 423
individuation and, 245 emotional reactions connected
with a rejected defini
lack of a sense of organization lies below the level of
tion, handling, 366
MUs, overts and withholds and PTSness, 330, 406
errors, 238
manifestation of a withhold in addition to a Crashing
example of how to clear a word, 182
Mis-U, 356 examples of student reactions and
correct handlings
misdirections of the pc indicate he is withholding,
on M9, 135
247-248 False Data Stripping and, 373
misunderstood word comes earlier in time and is more
false declares brought about by lack of, 375
basic than the withhold, 387 finding Crashing
Mis-Us is not a substitute for full
misunderstood word or symbol and, 387 W/Cing,
347
person who has overts and withholds on a subject
folder check before starting a crammingor other Qual
cannot perform in that area, 311 corrective
action, 423
power to forgive, 225, 227 getting a simpler
dictionary, 183
pulling withholds in nonmetered Crashing Mis-U find-
had Qual corrective actions and has gotten worse or
ing, 350, 388, 390 made no improvement,
handling, 423
pulling withholds must be thorough and go to real
handling MUs and confusions which are obscuring the
VGIs, 390 Crashing MU, 387
pulling withholds off the meter, 390 he is rejecting
the material he is reading or the defini
stem from Mis-Us, 350 tion of the word he is
clearing, handling, 371
still stuck in the shame, blame and regret of the High
Crime checkouts and, 375
unconfessed overt or withhold, handling, 227 how
long to use the word in sentences, 133, 182
taking heavy drugs and alcohol because he had with-
how to clear a word, 133,182
holds and could not confront, 311 how to
clear a word when you don't know the context,
upset caused by missing a, 351 183
what withholds add up to, 245 idioms have to be
cleared, 134,182
word(s); see also misunderstood word importance of the Word
Clearer knowing the correct
can be more than one F/N per word, 183 definition
of the word, 351
clearing a word to conceptual understanding, 133, learn
the full definition for a word as well as its syno
183, 425 nyms, 365
definition of a cleared word, 183 made to look up words
he understood, handling (in
made to look up words he understood, handling (in
M9), 140
M9), 140 marry up routine M9 with Crashing Mis-
U finding
misunderstood word or symbol defined, 363 and
all of its steps where the person isn't making it
notes in dictionary on word usage must be cleared, 134
otherwise, 362
"not-understood" word or symbol, example, 365
Method 9 is probably the top key method of Word
"word chains," handling, 183 Clearing today,
375
Word Clearer(s), miracle results of Word Clearing make all
the differ
first action is to himself look up the definition and
ence in the world to the quality of technical delivery,
derivation of the word, 351 375
High Crime checkouts and, 376 misunderstood word or
symbol in the definition, hand importance of the Word Clearer
knowing the correct ling, 134,183
definition of the word, 351 nattery about Qual
corrective actions or Qual, hand
Mis-Us and, 134, 351 ling, 422
what happens when the Word Clearer has misunder- notes
in dictionary on word usage must be cleared,
stoods on the material being word cleared, 134
134, 183
Word Clearing; see also misunderstood words obsolete
definitions, when to clear them, 134, 182
all methods of W/Cing are utilized in Crashing Mis-U
out-Int and, 192, 423
finding, 349 people who have no idea of
concept get bogged into
archaic definitions, when to clear them, 134, 182
terms and mechanics, 425
ask for instances of practical usage from the person
person backing off from applying data he is studying
you found a Crashing Mis-U on, 352
despite standard Word Clearing, handling, 371
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
Word Clearing (cont,) Word Clearing Method 9 (cont,)
person is not duplicating the material he has studied
glib student on M9, spotting him, 131
despite Word Clearing, handling, 371 grammar
book used to clear a word, 137, 138
person will not necessarily read on something that he
handling the extensively mistrained glib student, 132
believes to be true, 371 High Crime checkouts
and, 375
Qualifications Division and, 375 history of, 128
Quickie Grades brought about by lack of, 375 how long
to use the word in sentences, 133
responsibility of twins during, 381 how to clear a
word, 133
spending a lot of time clearing words within definitions
how to learn Method 9,129
of words, handling, 183 is a great
civilization saver, 141
synonyms, clearing of, 134, 182 is probably the top
key method of W/Cing today, 128,
technical or specialized definitions, when to clear
375
them, 133,182 it is the earlier word or symbol
which has caused the
twinning on, 379 stumble or twitch or blink or
omit or mispronuncia
twin word clears his fellow student, 381 tion
or what have you, 128
using the read to steer him to the area and find the
made to look up words he understood, handling, 140
Mis-U, 353 marry up routine M9 with Crashing Mis-
U finding and
utilize all methods of W/Cing and whatever else it
all of its steps where the person isn't making it other takes
to find the Crashing Mis-U, 362 wise, 362
what happens when the Word Clearer has misunder- M8
preceding M9, 129, 132
stoods on the material being word cleared, 134
meter not required for, 129
which definition to clear first, 133 Mis-U may be in
an area related to the subject and the
"word chains," handling, 183 word itself
doesn't appear in the text you're hand
word not reading on the meter because the person
ling, 362
"thinks he knows," 367 M9 Picture Book,
128,141
worksheets, contents and handling of, 140 never go
robotic or rote on M9 procedure, 140
you've done full Crashing Mis-U and product debug
nonoptimum reaction equals Mis-U, 133
procedure and still haven't gotten the Crashing
nonoptimum reactions that may show up, 130
Mis-U, handling, 361 procedure, 128,132
Word Clearing Correction List, quarrels or upsets on M9,
handling, 140
form, 238 right way to do it, 128
Method 5 and, 238 spot-checking the student during,
133
Method 3 and, 238 student goes to Examiner at end
of M9 session, 134
use of, 238 student reading like a robot and
suppressing everyWord Clearing Method 1, thing,
handling, 131
how to clear a word when you don't know the context,
take the materials one paragraph or section at a time
183 and M9 each other on it, 134
new Method 1 Word Clearing, 270 teaching M9, 129,140
Word Clearing Method 2, having to do Method 2 and TRs and,
140
Method 4 on certain materials before the Crashing
twinning on, 378, 379, 380
MU can then be located, 387 usefulness of, 129
Word Clearing Method 4, having to do Method 2 and virtueof,
129
Method 4 on certain materials before the Crashing what
happens when the Word Clearer has misunder
MU can then be located, 387 stoods on
the material being word cleared, 134
Word Clearing Method 5, how to clear a word when you what
happens when the word that was misunderstood
don't know the context, 183 is located, 131
Word Clearing Method 6, how to clear a word when you what
is present when M9 doesn't work, 361
don't know the context, 183 where there is a
student reaction, a misunderstood
Word Cle~ring Method 8, word will be found, usually
just before the point he
how to clear a word when you don't know the context,
reacted, 140
183 which definition to clear first, 133
M9 preceded by, 129, 132 why Method 9 works, 130
twinning on, 380 why one uses it, 129
Word Clearing Method 9, you've M9ed the person on his
post materials and he's
brings about ability of student to find and clear his
not getting it or making it, handling, 362
own Mis-Us, 132 work(ing),
common reading materials, M9 on, 132 don't ever feel
weaker because you work for somebody
cramming and, 375 stronger, 20
Crashing Mis-U will not always show up for what it not
organizing any corner of his area or work due to
is in M9ing, 361 misunderstood words, 330
definition, 129 working only to be thanked or admired,
15
does not uncover false data, Crashing Mis-Us, overts,
worksheet(s),
withholds or PTSness, 361 always mark the read
an item gave on the, 37
done on a turn-about basis by the students themselves,
Confessional worksheets, routing of, 249
128 definition, 140
end result of a well done Method 9,141 prepared list
remains in the folder stapled to the, 70
example of finding a Mis-U with M9, 131 reads, TA
action, BDs and needle behavior noted
example of when you wouldn't ask him for his Mis-U,
clearly in the, 335
140 rules regarding worksheets apply to cramming
and
examples of student reactions and correct handlings,
any other Qual corrective actions, 422
135 Word Clearing worksheets, contents and
handling of,
first versions of M9 were not correctly written up, 128
140
SUBJECT INDEX-1978/1979
writers, people who go to writing courses in college
Y
almost never become writers, 307
written, if it isn't written it isn't true, 317, 402 year,
definition, 230
wrong, yoga, handling pc currently practicing, 66
if pc knows all about it, it isn't wrong with him, 1
yoghurt,
making himself right and others wrong, 389
antibiotics and, 161
pc concerned about being right or wrong, handling,
niacintakenwith, 173
69 vitamins taken with, 172
the most universally present aberration of making
others wrong, 307 Z
what is wrong with the pc is not known to the pc, 1
wrong Item(s); see also out-lists
due to failing to test the question for read, 36 Zombie
hanging pc with a wrong/uncharged item, 190 Mis-Us
causing one to become a, 130
W/S; see worksheet psychologist's mission to make the
population into
Wundt, Wilhelm, false texts and, 368 controllable
zombies, 435