No matching fragments found in this document.
From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Jun 04 15:44:56 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 4 Jun 1999 22:44:56 -0000
Subject: FZBA 1/14 SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <36468cdd4cb3429bf49d54c0d374572c@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 2211
Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:801049 alt.clearing.technology:83780
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME
SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 1
**************************************************
The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of:
1. The Old Tech Volumes
2. The New Tech Volumes
3. Confidential Material
4. BTBs
5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech
6. Anything else appropriate that we can find
They do not include
a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those)
b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately)
Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice
as much material as the old tech volumes), and because
the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the
years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each
year as a separate volume.
The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and
repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the
remaining parts to keep the size down.
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
CONTENTS:
We have assigned item numbers to everything we feel belongs
in this volume. We have also numbered items which are missing.
For this year, the missing items primarily consist of HCO
Information Letters (there are no official volumes which
collect these) and a few policies and bulletins (which are
probably BTBs) plus only one missing confidential HCOB.
These are listed after the main table of contents. If
anybody has copies of these, please post them.
There are also a few BTBs which we have included, but for
which we would like to see the original HCOBs if anybody
has them. Those are listed after the missing issues.
To aid in gaining an historical perspective, we have also
listed the other HCOPLs which we did not to include in this
volume.
Following that, we have placed the section of Pilot's
Master List of LRH Tapes which applies to this time period
to make it easy to find out which tapes were given at the
time these bulletins were written.
FREEZONE SUPERSET TECH VOLUME FOR 1963
CONTENTS:
(The approximate line number of the beginning of each part
is shown in parenthesis. This assumes that the repeated
headers are removed from parts 2 to 14 and the parts are
combined into a single large file)
part 1 (622)
001 HCOB 1 JAN 63 ACADEMY CURRICULUM, HOW TO TEACH AUD. & ROUTINE 2
002 HCOB 3 JAN 63 OPPOSITION LISTS, RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE
006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS"
009 HCOPL 15 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2-12
011 HCOB 27 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2 SIMPLIFIED
012 Ed. Note: OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES
013 HCOB 1 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3, URGENT, ALL CL III AND IV AUDITORS
014 HCOPL 8 FEB 63 CURRICULUM CHANGE
015 HCOPL 9 FEB 63 SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS
part 2 (2210)
016 HCOPL 11 FEB 63 AUDITING REGULATIONS
017 HCOB 11 FEB 63 CURRENT AUDITING
018 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 V UNIT
019 HCOPL 13 FEB 63 ACADEMY TAUGHT PROCESSES
020 HCOPL 14 FEB 63 HOW TO EXAMINE; THEORY EXAMINATIONS
021 HCOB 15 FEB 63 R2-R3, LISTING RULES
023 HCOB 20 FEB 63 R 2 & 3 MODEL SESSION (CANC.BY HCOB 21 MAY 63)
024 HCOPL 21 FEB 63 GOALS CHECK
025 HCOB 22 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3M, RUNDOWN BY STEPS
028 HCOB 25 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3-M GOAL FINDING BY METHOD B
029 HCOB 4 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A
030 HCOPL 6 MAR 63 SELLING TECHNIQUES FORBIDDEN
031 HCOB 6 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO HCOB OF FEB 22, 1963 R3M
034 HCOB 8 MAR 63 USE OF THE BIG MIDDLE RUDIMENTS
036 HCOB 9 MAR 63 CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14
037 HCOB 10 MAR 63 VANISHED R/S OR RR
039 HCOB 13 MAR 63 THE END OF A GPM
part 3 (4638)
040 HCOB 14 MAR 63 ROUTINE 2-ROUTINE 3, ARC BREAKS, HANDLING OF
041 HCOPL 15 MAR 63 CHECKSHEET RATING SYSTEM
042 HCOB 17 MAR 63 R2-R3 CORRECTIONS TO 13 MAR 63
043 HCOB 18 MAR 63 R2-R3, IMPORTANT DATA, DON'T FORCE THE PC
044 HCOPL 23 MAR 63 CLASSIFICATION OF AUDITORS, CLASS II AND GOALS
045 HCOB 23 MAR 63 CLEAR AND OT
046 HCOB 29 MAR 63 SUMMARY OF SEC CHECKING (BTB?) (BY REG SHARP)
047 HCOPL 29 MAR 63 CLEAR REQUIREMENT
048 HCOB 30 MAR 63 ROUTINE 3M SIMPLIFIED
part 4 (6639)
049 HCOB 2 APR 63 DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING TAPE OF 28 MARCH 1963
050 HCOB 6 APR 63 R3M2, WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IN CLEARING
051 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, LISTING AND NULLING
052 HCOB 8 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, CORRECTED LINE PLOTS
053 HCOB 13 APR 63 R2G, ORIGINAL R2, 3GA, 2-10, 2-12, 2-12A AND OTHERS
054 HCOPL 13 APR 63 POLICY OF HGCS
055 HCOB 17 APR 63 R3M2 REDO GOALS FOUND ON THIS PATTERN
056 HCOB 18 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, DIRECTIVE LISTING
057 HCOPL 19 APR 63 HANDLING ORG TECHNICAL QUERIES
058 HCOB 23 APR 63 ROUTINE 3M2, HANDLING THE GPM
part 5 (8680)
059 HCOB 24 APR 63 R3M2, TIPS, THE ROCKET READ OF A RELIABLE ITEM
060 HCOB 25 APR 63 METER READING TRS
061 HCOB 28 APR 63 ROUTINE 3, AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT
062 HCOB 29 APR 63 ROUTINE 3, DIRECTIVE LISTING, LISTING LIABILITIES
063 HCOB 29 APR 63 MODERNIZED TRAINING DRILLS USING PERMISSIVE COACHING
064 HCOB 30 APR 63 ROUTINE 3
065 HCOPL 30 APR 63 THE SAINT HILL STAFF CO-AUDIT
066 HCOB 4 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT NO. 2
067 HCOB 5 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, R3 STABLE DATA
068 HCOB 8 MAY 63 THE NATURE OF FORMATION OF THE GPM
part 6 (10828)
071 HCOB 11 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3 HEAVEN
072 HCOB 12 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, RI FORM (GPM RI FORM CORRECTED)
073 HCOB 13 MAY 63 R3N DIRECTIVE LISTING WITH NEW R3 MODEL SESSION
074 Hand ?? Handwritten note in New Tech Vols
075 HCOB 15 MAY 63 THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, BULLETIN 1
076 HCOPL 15 MAY 63 INSTRUCTOR HATS
077 HCOB 20 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3N, PROPER PROGRAMING, FAST BLOWING RIS
078 HCOB 21 MAY 63 R3R MODEL SESSION (CANCELLED - HCOB 19 NOV 63)
part 7 (12944)
081 HCOB 26 MAY 63 ROUTINE 3, LINE PLOT (LINE PLOT FIRST SERIES CORRECTED)
082 HCOTF 26 MAY 63 LINE PLOT FIRST SERIES CORRECTED
083 HCOB 27 MAY 63 CAUSE OF ARC BREAKS
084 HCOPL 31 MAY 63 TRAINING OF CLEARS
085 HCOB 1 JUN 63 ROUTINE 2, NEW PROCESSES
086 HCOB 4 JUN 63 ROUTINE 3, HANDLING GPMS
088 HCOB 8 JUN 63 THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, #2
089 HCOPL 10 JUN 63 SCIENTOLOGY TRAINING, TECHNICAL STUDIES
090 HCOB 13 JUN 63 NEW TRAINING DRILLS
part 8 (14946)
091 HCOPL 17 JUN 63 STAFF CLEARING PROGRAM
095 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 STUDENTS BLOWING (CANC PER OEC)
097 HCOB 24 JUN 63 ROUTINE 3, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, BULLETIN 3
099 HCOB 25 JUN 63 ROUTINE 2H, ARC BREAKS BY ASSESSMENT
100 HCOB 1 JUL 63 ROUTINE 3R, BULLETIN 4, PRELIMINARY STEP
101 HCOTF 1 JUL 63 LINE PLOT, FIRST SERIES HELOTROBUS IMPLANTS
102 HCOPL 3 JUL 63 CHANGE OF ROUTING ORG TECH REPORTS
part 9 (16965)
103 HCOB 5 JUL 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS
104 HCOB 5 JUL 63 CCHS REWRITTEN
105 HCOB 9 JUL 63 A TECH SUMMARY, THE REQUIRED SKILLS OF PROC. AND WHY
106 HCOPL 9 JUL 63 HPA/HCA CERTIFICATE CHECKSHEET
109 HCOB 11 JUL 63 AUDITING RUNDOWN - MISSED W/H - TO BE RUN IN X1 UNIT
110 HCOB 14 JUL 63 ROUTINE 3N, LINE PLOTS
111 HCOB 17 JUL 63 ERRORS IN RUNNING 3N
112 HCOB 21 JUL 63 CO-AUDIT ARC BREAK PROCESS
113 HCOB 22 JUL 63 I YOU CAN BE RIGHT
114 HCOB 22 JUL 63 III ORG TECHNICAL, HGC PROCESSES AND TRAINING
part 10 (19283)
115 HCOB 23 JUL 63 AUDITING RUNDOWN, MISSED W\Hs, TO BE RUN IN X1 UNIT
116 HCOPL 23 JUL 63 RETREADS ON SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
117 HCOB 24 JUL 63 R3N CORRECTIONS
118 BTB 26 JUL 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY COACHING THEORY
119 HCOB 28 JUL 63 TIME AND THE TONE ARM
120 HCOB 29 JUL 63 SCIENTOLOGY REVIEW
121 HCOB 29 JUL 63 R3R-R3N-R3T, CAUTIONARY HCOB
122 HCOPL 30 JUL 63 CURRENT PLANNING
123 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 PUBLIC PROJECT ONE
124 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 SAINT HILL COURSE CHANGES
125 HCOB 4 AUG 63 E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR
126 HCOPL 8 AUG 63 PLANTS IN ACADEMIES - INTRO. OF FORM B (CANC PER OEC)
127 HCOB 9 AUG 63 DEFINITION OF RELEASE
129 HCOB 11 AUG 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS
130 HCOPL 12 AUG 63 CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS
part 11 (21392)
131 HCOB 14 AUG 63 LECTURE GRAPHS
133 HCOB 19 AUG 63 HOW TO DO AN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT
134 HCOB 20 AUG 63 R3R-R3N, THE PRECLEAR'S POSTULATES
135 HCOPL 21 AUG 63 CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TARGETS, PROJECT 80, A PREVIEW
137 HCOB 22 AUG 63 PROJECT 80, THE ITSA LINE AND TONE ARM
138 HCOPL 22 AUG 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS ON STAFF
139 HCOB 24 AUG 63 R3N, THE TRAIN GPMS, THE MARCAB BETWEEN LIVES IMPLANTS
140 HCOB 1 SEP 63 I ROUTINE THREE SC
141 HCOB 1 SEP 63 II SCIENTOLOGY TWO, ROUTINE 1C
142 HCOIL 1 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY ONE
144 HCOB 6 SEP 63 INSTRUCTING IN SCN AUDITING, INSTRUCTOR'S TASK,
part 12 (23547)
145 HCOB 9 SEP 63 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING
146 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA
148 HCOPL 18 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY FIVE SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS (CANC PER OEC)
149 HCOB 22 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY TWO PREPCHECK BUTTONS
150 HCOB 23 SEP 63 TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY
151 HCOPL 24 SEP 63 URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS (CANC. PER OEC)
152 HCOB 25 SEP 63 ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION
153 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC (CANC PER OEC)
156 BPL 27 SEP 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS
157 HCOB 28 SEP 63 ACTUAL GOALS
part 13 (25318)
159 HCOB 1 OCT 63 HOW TO GET TONE ARM ACTION
161 HCOB 2 OCT 63 GPMS, EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS WITHDRAWN
162 HCOB 8 OCT 63 HOW TO GET TA, ANALYZING AUDITING
163 HCOPL 8 OCT 63 I NEW SAINT HILL CERTIFICATES AND COURSE CHANGES
165 HCOB 16 OCT 63 R3SC SLOW ASSESSMENT
166 HCOB 17 OCT 63 I R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS
167 HCOB 17 OCT 63 II R-2C SLOW ASMT. BY DYN. DIR. FOR USE OF HCOB OF OCT 17
168 HCOPL 28 OCT 63 STUDENT ARC BREAKS
169 HCOB 31 OCT 63 R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS, CONTINUED
part 14 (27982)
170 HCOB 19 NOV 63 R3 MODEL SESSION REVISED (CANCELLED BY HCOB 20 APR 64)
171 TAL 21 NOV 63 DATA TAKEN FROM RECENT LRH LECTURE
173 HCOB 25 NOV 63 DIRTY NEEDLES
174 HCOPL 26 NOV 63 CERTIFICATE AND CLASS CHANGES, EVERYONE CLASSIFIED
175 HCOB 26 NOV 63 A NEW TRIANGLE, BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE, CASE ANALYSIS
176 HCOPL 4 DEC 63 ORG STAFF W/H CHECKS
177 HCOPL 6 DEC 63 ORG PROGRAMING
178 HCOIL 10 DEC 63 THE DANGEROUS ENVIRONMENT, THE TRUE STORY OF SCIENTOLOGY
179 HCOPL 11 DEC 63 CLASSIFICATION FOR EVERYONE
180 HCOPL 13 DEC 63 CO-AUDIT
181 HCOB 14 DEC 63 CASE ANALYSIS, HEALTH RESEARCH
182 HCOB 28 DEC 63 ROUTINE 6, INDICATORS, PART ONE: GOOD INDICATORS
185 MESSAGE LATE 63 DEC RON'S JOURNAL
end of volume (29793)
MISSING MATERIALS
003 HCOIL 5 JAN 63 A STATEMENT BY L. RON HUBBARD FOR THE PRESS
004 HCOIL 8 JAN 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 3
005 HCOIL 10 JAN 63 T.V. DEMONSTRATION OF T.R'S
007 HCOB 14 JAN 63 DEFINITION OF RELEASE (SEE 9 AUG 63)
008 HCOIL 15 JAN 63 THE DC SITUATION
010 HCOIL 16 JAN 63 OUR ROLE IN THE WORLD
022 HCOIL 17 FEB 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 4
026 HCOPL 22 FEB 63 CLEAR TEST 1963
027 HCOIL 22 FEB 63 TO MAGAZINES
032 HCOPL 6 MAR 63 R3M, HCO WW FORM G3, REVISED, FAST GOALS CHECK
033 HCOIL 7 MAR 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO 5
035 HCOAL 8 MAR 63 OPERATION OF BRITISH MARK V E-METER
038 HCOB 13 MAR 63 URGENT ADDL. CORRECTION TO 3M STEPS 13, 14
(The corrections in #038 are integrated into #036 of 9 MAR 63)
046 HCOPL 23 MAR 63 CLEAR TEST 1963, ISSUE II
053 HCOPL 11 APR 63 GOALS FINDING AND GOALS FINDERS
058 HCOPL 22 APR 63 HAT OF COURSE ADMINISTRATOR (CANC 16 MAY 69)
069 HCOPL 8 MAY 63 SQUIRREL PROCESS INVESTIGATION
070 HCOIL 10 MAY 63 THE E-METER
079 HCOB 21 MAY 63 INQUISITIVE TRS (BTB?)
080 HCOPL 24 MAY 63 CHANGES IN BASEMENT STUDENT FACILITIES
087 HCOB 4 JUN 63 CHECKING OUT THE JOBURG, TIPS TO ... INSTRUCTORS (BTB?)
092 HCOPL 17 JUN 63 RAY KEMP & SAN DIEGO
093 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 TAPE RELEASE
094 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 SUSPENSION OF CERTS
096 HCOPL 18 JUN 63 POLICY CHECKS (CANC PER OEC)
098 HCOB 24 JUN 63 CORR. OF R3 ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS (CORR. ONE WORD)
107 BPL 9 JUL 63 METER DEMONSTRATION BOOTH HAT R. 5 AUG 75
108 HCOIL 9 JUL 63 A TREATISE ON THE E-METER
122 HCOB 29 JUL 63 SHSBC TRAINING DRILLS
128 HCOIL 9 AUG 63 PUBLIC MEETINGS
132 HCOPL 16 AUG 63 INDIV. AUDITORS OPERATING IN A CENTRAL ORG CONTROL AREA
136 HCOIL 21 AUG 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 6
143 HCOB 4 SEP 63 ASSESSMENT TRS
147 HCOIL 16 SEP 63 NEW SCIENTOLOGY BASIC DEFINITIONS
154 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 RIGHT TO REFUSE HPA/HCA STUDENT APPLICATION
155 HCOB 25 SEP 63 L&N FOR LOCKS, NOT RIS (COMP. FROM EARLIER HCOBS)
158 HCOPL 28 SEP 63 STUDENT ARC BREAKS (CANC PER OEC)
160 HCOB 1 OCT 63 TRAINING CYCLES (BTB?) (DISPATCH TO LRH FROM JOE BREEDEN)
164 HCOPL 8 OCT 63 DOCTORS OF SCIENTOLOGY
172 SECED 23 NOV 63 RON'S INSTRUCTIONS [KENNEDY ...]
183 HCOIL 17 DEC 63 RON'S JOURNAL NO. 7
184 HCOB 31 DEC 63 (CONFIDENTIAL)
LOOKING FOR HCOB ORIGINALS OF BTBS
006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS"
118 BTB 26 JUL 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY COACHING THEORY
145 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA
163 HCOB 17 OCT 63 I R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS
164 HCOB 17 OCT 63 II R-2C SLOW ASMT. BY DYN. DIR. FOR USE OF HCOB OF OCT 17
166 HCOB 31 OCT 63 R-2C SLOW ASSESSMENT BY DYNAMICS, CONTINUED
NOTE:
HCOB 12 FEB 63 R2-12,3-21,AND 3GAXX-TIGER DRILLING FOR NULLING BY MID RUDS
- this is omitted because it is an identical Franchise reissue of
of HCOB 29 NOV 62
POLICIES ETC. NOT INCLUDED
HCOPL 1 JAN 63 OBJECTIVE THREE CELEBRITIES
HCOPL 4 JAN 63 PATTERN OF DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOPL 22 JAN 63 REISSUE SER 9 HATS & OTHER FOLDERS (REISS OF PL 15 SEP 59)
HCOPL 1 FEB 63 HCO AREA 5%S (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOPL 6 FEB 63 HCO AREA 5%S (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOPL 7 FEB 63 REISS SER 10 ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATIONS (PL 28 JUL 59)
HCOPL 13 FEB 63 10% DUE TO WW
HCOPL 14 FEB 63 SHSBC REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
HCOPL 14 FEB 63 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRAL ORGS CONTROL AREAS
HCOPL 19 FEB 63 CLASSIFICATION OF CENTRAL ORGS CONTROL AREAS
HCOPL 20 FEB 63 THE EVOLUTION OF A DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOPL 21 FEB 63 THE EVOLUTION OF A DISTRICT OFFICE (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOPL 25 FEB 63 SOUTH AFRICA PERSONNEL DIRECTORY
HCOPL 28 FEB 63 DEPUTY HCO WW EXEC SEC
HCOPL 12 MAR 63 STAFF PERSONNEL ALLOWANCE, SAINT HILL
HCOPL 13 MAR 63 AMNESTY
HCOPL 15 MAR 63 ORG DESPATCH ROUTINGS TO/FROM USA/CANADA
HCOPL 18 MAR 63 DISTRICT OFFICE TESTING (CANC PER OEC)
HCOPL 20 MAR 63 I HCO WW ELECTRIC STENCIL-CUTTING MACHINE
HCOPL 20 MAR 63 II SELF-DETERMINISM IN CENTRAL ORGANIZATIONS
HCOPL 23 MAR 63 POLICIES IN FORCE, ORG/ASSOC SECS, HCO SECS
HCOPL 25 MAR 63 REISS SER 11 A MODEL HAT FOR AN EXECUTIVE (PL 19 SEP 58)
HCOPL 2 APR 63 CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
HCOPL 2 APR 63 FOOD & CLEANING REGULATIONS STUDENTS
HCOPL 4 APR 63 II DIRECTOR OF TRAINING WEEKLY STUDENT INTERVIEWS
HCOPL 4 APR 63 IMPORTANT CHANGES IN TECH REPORTS TO WW
HCOPL 4 APR 63 DISTRICT OFFICES TECH REPORTS TO WW
HCOPL 4 APR 63 HCO TECH SEC WW DISBANDED
HCOPL 5 APR 63 ORGANIZATION STUDENTS ON SAINT HILL COURSE
HCOPL 5 APR 63 AUDIT OF ORGANIZATIONAL BOOKS (CANC 21 JAN 68)
HCOPL 10 APR 63 REISS SER 12 WHAT AN EXEC WANTS ON HIS LINES (PL 26 MAY 59)
HCOPL 11 APR 63 ORG DESPATCH ROUTINGS USA/CANADA
HCOPL 11 APR 63 EMERGENCY LIBRARY
HCOPL 11 APR 63 TECH DIR'S WEEKLY REPORT
HCOPL 11 APR 63 APPOINTMENTS
HCOPL 11 APR 63 MEMBERSHIPS
HCOPL 16 APR 63 HCO EXECS CURRENT LISTS
HCOPL 25 APR 63 RREV. 29 AUG 90 DUTIES OF A STAFF MEMBER
HCOPL 2 MAY 63 REISS SER 13 HOW TO DO A STAFF JOB (REISS PL 11 APR 61)
HCOPL 5 MAY 63 SEC ED; STAFF MEMBER ENROLLMENTS
HCOPL 9 MAY 63 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL
HCOPL 9 MAY 63 CHANGE IN REPORT LINE (CANC. PER OEC)
HCOAL 10 MAY 63 THE PATTERN FOR AN HCO AREA SECRETARY
HCOPL 10 MAY 63 STUDENT RATES FOR HGC AUDITING IN SA ORG (CANC PER OEC)
SECED 10 MAY 63 MAIDS HAT
HCOPL 13 MAY 63 SUPPLIES OF BOOKS TO SCIENTOLOGY ORGS (CANC PER OEC)
SECED 20 MAY 63 SCIENTOLOGY MISSIONARY HAT
HCOPL 25 MAY 63 PRESS RELATIONS (CANC 11 OCT 65)
HCOPL 29 MAY 63 REISS SER 14 HOW TO HANDLE WORK (REISS OF HCOB 19 AUG 59)
HCOPL 24 JUN 63 REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTS
HCOPL 26 JUN 63 REISS SER 15, ROUTING OF COMM (REISS OF HCOB 25 FEB 58)
HCOPL 26 JUN 63 RESUME OF FRANCHISE POLICY
HCOPL 5 JUL 63 SALES OF LIFETIME MEMBERSHIPS OR SHARES
HCOPL 19 JUL 63 REISS SER 16 ADMIN STABLE DATA (REISS OF SECED 4 MAY 59)
HCOPL 23 JUL 63 APPOINTMENT (USA)
HCOPL 26 JUL 63 CONTINENTAL DIRECTOR HAT WRITE-UP (CANC PER OEC)
HCOPL 14 AUG 63 PRESS POLICIES (REISS AS PR SERIES 31)
HCOPL 2 SEP 63 STAFF CHANGES
HCOPL 3 SEP 63 STATUS OF AUCKLAND
HCOPL 7 SEP 63 COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE, SCN JURISPRUDENCE, ADMIN OF
HCOPL 10 SEP 63 REISS 17 THE CREDO OF A GOOD & SKILLED MGR(HCOB 22 APR 59)
HCOPL 22 SEP 63 CONCERNING COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE
HCOPL 3 OCT 63 APPOINTMENT
HCOPL 4 OCT 63 TECHNICAL COUNCIL
HCOPL 7 OCT 63 FIRE SECURITY DOORS
HCOPL 23 OCT 63 REFUND POLICY
HCOPL 30 OCT 63 REISS 18 CONCERNING CITY OFFICES
HCOPL 4 NOV 63 PAY CARD
HCOPL 11 NOV 63 COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE
HCOPL 22 NOV 63 APPOINTMENT
HCOPL 27 DEC 63 THE "MAGIC" OF GOOD MANAGEMENT
HCOPL 31 DEC 63 SH RE-ORGANIZATION
********************
From Pilot's Master List of LRH Tapes. See the full Master
List (available at fza.org, fzint.org, etc.) for more info.
on his complilation.
============ TAPES OF 1963 =============
Briefing course cassetts Level I contain new numbers 233 to 292
Briefing course cassetts Level J contain new numbers 293 to 360
Briefing course cassetts Level K contain new numbers 361 to 420
SHSBC-226 ren 253 8 Jan R2-10 and R2-12
SHSBC-227 ren 254 8 Jan Case Repair
SHSBC-228 ren 255 10 Jan R2-12
SHSBC-229 ren 256 10 Jan How to Audit
> Interview 10 Jan St. Hill Interview (LRH with Australian press)
SHSBC-230 ren 257 15 Jan R2-12 Dead Horses
SHSBC-231 ren 258 15 Jan R2-12 Nerves (labled Nevers on new list)
TVD-16 ren BC-259 16 Jan TV Demo: TR 0 Demonstration
SHSBC-232 ren 260 16 Jan TR 0 Lecture
SHSBC-233 ren 261 6 Feb Instructors' Conference
SHSBC-234 ren 262 7 Feb R3MX, Part I
SHSBC-235 ren 263 7 Feb R3MX, Part II
SHSBC-236 ren 264 12 Feb Routine 3M
SHSBC-237 ren 265 13 Feb TV Demo: Ruds and Havingness
SHSBC-238 ren 266 13 Feb Discussion of TV Demo Sessions
SHSBC-239 ren 267 14 Feb Routine 3M Data
SHSBC-240 ren 268 19 Feb Rundown on Processes
TVD ... ren 269 20 Feb TV Demo: Finding RRs
SHSBC-241 ren 270 20 Feb Talk on TV Demo -- Finding RRs
SHSBC-242 ren 271 21 Feb R2 and R3: Current Auditing Rundown
SHSBC-243 ren 272 26 Feb R3M: Current Rundown by Steps
SHSBC-246 ren 273 27 Feb TV Demo: Case Repair (TVD-17)
SHSBC-246A 27 Feb TV Demo cont.(TVD-17A) <maybe combined with above>
SHSBC-244 ren 274 28 Feb Goals Problem Mass
SHSBC-245 ren 275 5 Mar R2 and R3: Urgent Data
SHSBC-247 ren 276 7 Mar When Faced with the Unusual Do the Usual
SHSBC-248 ren 277 19 Mar R3M: How to Find Goals
SHSBC-249 .... 13 Mar Auditing & Assessing -- supposedly was a replay
of SHSBC-185 of 14 AUG 62 originally titled "World Clearing"
SHSBC-250 .... 19 Mar Flattening A Process -- supposedly was a replay
of CSC-1 of 1 SEP 62 originally titled "Presentation of the GPM"
TVD-18 ren BC-278 20 Mar TV Demo: Rudiments and Havingness Session and
Short Lecture (LRH audits Reg Sharp)
SHSBC-251 ren 279 21 Mar R2G Series
SHSBC-252 ren 280 26 Mar Case Repair
SHSBC-254 ren 281 27 Mar (TVD-19) TV Demo: Sec Checking -- with
Comments by LRH (Reg Sharp audits Leslie Van Der Statten)
SHSBC-253 ren 282 28 Mar The GPM <in FPRD casset series>
SHSBC-256 ren 283 2 Apr GPM Items <orig title "Line Plot Items">
SHSBC-255 ren 284 4 Apr Anatomy of the GPM
SHSBC-257 ren 285 16 Apr Top of the GPM
SHSBC-258 ren 286 18 Apr Directive Listing
On a Saturday afternoon at Saint Hill, LRH gave these two
lectures to professional Scientologists and students currently
on course in the Academy of Scientology in London.
PAC-1 ren BC-286a 20 Apr What Clearing Is
PAC-2 ren BC-286b 20 Apr Basic Purpose <original title "Clearing">
SHSBC-259 ren 287 23 Apr Goals <orig title "Goals Problem Mass">
SHSBC-260 ren 288 25 Apr Finding Goals
SHSBC-261 ren 289 30 Apr Pattern of the GPM <orig "Directive Listing">
SHSBC-262 ren 290 2 May Running the GPM
SHSBC-263 ren 291 14 May Implant GPMs
SHSBC-264 ren 292 15 May TV Demo 20: Blocking Out and Dating Incidents
SHSBC-265 ren 293 16 May The Time Track <in whole track cassets>
SHSBC-266 ren 294 21 May The Helatrobus Implants
SHSBC-267 ren 295 22 May (TVD-21) TV Demo: Engram Running -- Helatrobus
Implant Goal (LRH audits MSH)
(the above 2 tapes are available online at operation clambake)
SHSBC-268 ren 296 23 May State of OT <in both whole track & FPRD cass.>
SHSBC-269 ren 297 28 May Handling ARC Breaks <level 3 cass.>
SHSBC-270 ren 298 29 May Programing Cases, Part I
SHSBC-271 ren 299 30 May Programing Cases, Part II
SHSBC-272 ren 300 11 Jun Engram Chain Running
SHSBC-273 ren 301 12 Jun ARC Straightwire
SHSBC-274 ren 302 13 Jun Levels of Case
SHSBC-275 ren 303 18 Jun Beingness
SHSBC-276 ren 304 19 Jun Summary of Modern Auditing
SHSBC-277 ren 305 20 Jun History of Psychotherapy
SHSBC-278 ren 306 25 Jun Modern Processes <orig R2H>
SHSBC-279 ren 307 26 Jun TV Demo: Listing Assmt for Engram Running, I
SHSBC-280 ren 308 27 Jun TV Demo: Listing Assmt for Engram Running, II
SHSBC-281 ren 309 9 Jul The Free Being <whole track cass.>
SHSBC-282 ren 310 10 Jul Auditing Skills for R3R
SHSBC-284a ren 311 10 Jul Aud Session: Preliminary Steps of R3R, Part I
SHSBC-284b ren 312 10 Jul Aud Session: Preliminary Steps of R3R, Part II
SHSBC-283 ren 313 11 Jul ARC Breaks
SHSBC-285 ren 314 16 Jul Tips on Running R3R
SHSBC-286 ren 315 17 Jul Dating
SHSBC-287 ren 316 18 Jul Errors in Time <FZ Bible transcription>
SHSBC-288 ren 317 23 Jul Between Lives Implants <available at clambake>
SHSBC-289 ren 318 24 Jul ARC Breaks and the Comm Cycle <L3 cass>
SHSBC-290 ren 319 25 Jul Comm Cycles in Auditing <L0 cass.>
SHSBC-291 ren 320 6 Aug Auditing Comm Cycles <L0 cass>
SHSBC-292 ren 321 7 Aug R2H Fundamentals
SHSBC-293 ren 322 8 Aug R2H Assessment
SHSBC-294 ren 323 14 Aug Auditing Tips
SHSBC-295 ren 324 15 Aug The Tone Arm
SHSBC-296 ren 325 20 Aug The Itsa Line <L0 cass>
SHSBC-297 ren 326 21 Aug The Itsa Line (cont.) <L0 cass>
SHSBC-298 ren 327 22 Aug Project 80
SHSBC-299 ren 328 27 Aug Rightness and Wrongness <L4 cass>
SHSBC-300 ren 329 28 Aug The Tone Arm and the Service Facsimile
SHSBC-301 ren 330 29 Aug The Service Facsimile
SHSBC-302a ren 331 3 Sep R3SC <L4 cass>
SHSBC-302 ren 332 4 Sep How to Find a Service Facsimile <L4 cass>
SHSBC-303 ren 333 5 Sep Service Fac Assessment <L4 cass.>
SHSBC-304 ren 334 10 Sep Destimulation of a Case
SHSBC-306 ren 335 11 Sep Service Facs and GPMs
SHSBC-305 ren 336 12 Sep Service Facsimiles
SHSBC-307 ren 337 17 Sep What You Are Auditing
SHSBC-308 ren 338 18 Sep Saint Hill Service Facsimile Handling
SHSBC-309 ren 339 19 Sep Routine 4M TA
SHSBC-... ren 340 24 Sep Summary I
SHSBC-310 ren 341 25 Sep Summary II: Scientology 0
SHSBC-311 ren 342 26 Sep Summary III: About Level IV Auditing
SHSBC-312 ren 343 15 Oct Essentials of Auditing
SHSBC-313 ren 344 16 Oct The Itsa Maker Line
SHSBC-314 ren 345 17 Oct Level IV Auditing
SHSBC-315 ren 346 21 Oct Attack and GPMs
SHSBC-316 ren 347 22 Oct The Integration of Auditing
SHSBC-317 ren 348 23 Oct Auditing the GPM
SHSBC-318 ren 349 29 Oct Routine 4
SHSBC-319 ren 350 30 Oct R4 Case Assembly
SHSBC-320 ren 351 31 Oct R4M2 Programing
SHSBC-321 ren 352 5 Nov Three Zones of Auditing
SHSBC-322 ren 353 7 Nov Relationship of Training to OT
> ... 11 Nov Interview with Sat. Evening Post - 1
> ... 11 Nov Interview with Sat. Evening Post - 2
SHSBC-323 ren 354 26 Nov R4 Auditing
> ... 28 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH - 1
> ... 28 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH = 2
SHSBC-330 ren 355 28 Nov TV Demo 25: Auditing Demo with Comments by LRH
SHSBC-324 ren 356 28 Nov Seven Classifications
> ... 29 Nov Session, MSH auditing LRH
> ... 2 Dec PT Truncated GPM, LRH auditing MSH
> ... 2 Dec Finding a Next Goal, LRH auditing MSH
SHSBC-325 ren 357 3 Dec Certifications and Classifications
SHSBC-326 ren 358 4 Dec TV Demo 24: Basic Auditing -- Lecture and Demo
> ... 2 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
SHSBC-327 ren 359 5 Dec Basic Auditing
> SHSBC-327E 10 Dec The Dangerous Environment
SHSBC-328 ren 360 10 Dec Scientology Zero
> ... 11 Dec Session Goals to Do and Think
SHSBC-329 ren 361 12 Dec Summary of OT Processes
> ... 13 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
> ... 15 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
> ... 20 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
> ... 22 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
> ... 23 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
> SC-1A 30 Dec Summary of R6, Part 1
> SC-1B 30 Dec Summary of R6, Part 2
> SC-2 30 Dec Objects of the Mind, Part 1
> SC-3 30 Dec Objects of the Mind, Part 2
> ... 31 Dec Session, LRH auditing MSH
SH Spec-1 ren 362 31 Dec Indicators
****************************
FREEZONE TECH VOLUME 1963
==================
001 HCOB 1 JAN 63 ACADEMY CURRICULUM, HOW TO TEACH AUD. & ROUTINE 2
(TV5 p. 227-9, NTV VII p. 4-8)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Central Orgs
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 JANUARY AD13
ACADEMY CURRICULUM
HOW TO TEACH AUDITING AND ROUTINE 2
INTRODUCTION
With the placing of a clearing technology into HCA/HPA
hands, we must revise our concept of training.
Routine 2-12 is complicated and exact. But as it is the
only thing known which cracks all cases, we have no choice
in the matter. We can and must learn it well. It must not
be indifferently learned. But as it is not going to change
as is well proven, time and effort can be spent upon it and
must be.
We must rise to the occasion. We must use all we know to
learn and teach all we have to teach to get Routine 2 done.
CHECK SHEETS
There are two distinctly different series of check sheets
for doing Routine 2 processes and auditing. These are:
(a) Those that apply to Routine 2, the GPM and data
listing, nulling and case errors and repair;
(b) Those that apply to auditing, its basics, skills, the meter.
Although these associate and interlock, they are two
separate subjects of study.
For years we have faced the arbitrary that those whose
cases got in the road of their auditing yet had to
assimilate auditing theory and practice.
Routine 2 well done removes with some rapidity these case
barriers to auditing.
Therefore there are several phases desirable in studying
auditing and Routine 2.
V UNIT CLASS 0
FIRST PHASE
For a new student, doing Routine 2-10 precedes study of
auditing and Routine 2. This is done under close
supervision on a co-audit basis with the Co-audit
Supervisor taking a hand on cases, checking out Items,
correcting cases, etc.
This is done until the student has found in another and has
had found in himself 2 or 3 packages. Accuracy is the
essence of this first step, otherwise the wasted time and
wrong Items will give the whole action the tone of despair.
Only good results are stressed, not the form of how they
are achieved.
In this first phase we want the student to see that Routine
2 produces changes for the better in himself and the pc and
is worth learning. This is what we're trying to show.
We remove, if the Routine 2 is good, the barriers to
learning auditing and Scientology.
All we want then from the first phase is:
(a) Reality on the benefits of the process and auditing; and
(b) Removal of the barriers to being a good auditor.
W UNIT CLASS Ia
SECOND PHASE
This phase actually starts the training of a Scientologist.
He or she, however, should have started its check sheets in
the V unit.
We teach the basics of Scientology, its history, the
Auditor's Code, Axioms, the ARC triangle and Tone Scale out
of the old Notes on Lectures booklet.
In practical and auditing we teach and do objective
processes, Op Pro by Dup and the CCHs.
We wish to accomplish this in this phase:
(a) A Reality that Scientology is a real subject and very precise,
not a mixture of Indian philosophy and cute tricks, and give the
student solid grounding on pure Scientology basics, disrelated
from auditing; and
(b) Get the student capable of repetition of commands and
unafraid in actual physical handling of other bodies.
X UNIT CLASS Ib
THIRD PHASE
We now enter the student upon a phase of formal auditing
consisting of theory and practical, using all the basics of
auditing, the TRs, the meter, fine points.
This phase should specialize in basic auditing skills, very
precisely applicable to handling an auditing session, a
meter, meter drills, anti Q and A, TRs 0-4, Model Session,
Mid Ruds, Missed Withholds, etc.
And we get the student to run formal processes on the Meter
until he or she understands a meter. These processes
consist only of ARC Straight Wire, comm processes, nothing
that will disturb 2-12 or run out Rockslams. The idea of
this auditing is to get the student used to handling a
session with competence.
From this phase we expect:
(a) The basics of auditing in theory and practical; and
(b) Confidence in confronting a bank and handling a pc on a
meter with good form.
Y UNIT CLASS IIa
FOURTH PHASE
In the fourth phase our interest is in Prepchecking as an
action and a prelude to lists in the form of a Problems
Intensive.
In theory and practical we teach how to do a Problems
Intensive, advanced metering, how to detect case changes,
better sessioning, more TRs 0-4, more basics of Scientology
such as Axioms and Logics.
In auditing, the student does a Problems Intensive and
receives one. The stress is on good sessioning and RESULTS.
From this phase we expect:
(a) A good command of a Problems Intensive theory and
practical, how to detect case changes; and
(b) The ability to actually audit to a good result and keep
Mid Ruds in and CLEAN A NEEDLE.
Z UNIT CLASS IIb
FIFTH PHASE
This is a theory and practical phase for Routine 2-12.
The student also audits Routine 2-12 under supervision.
The whole check sheet for Routine 2-12 is thrown at the
student. The long HCO Bulletins are segmented into a page
or two and thereby made into several passes (the student
studies and is examined on them in segments).
In auditing, the student is permitted to do full 2-12 and
the stress is on RESULTS with accurate Routine 2-12.
PG UNIT - CLASS II
SIXTH PHASE
This is a post-graduate phase on Routine 2-12. It was
formerly known as "Interne".
The theory and practical are all on the stress of CASE
REPAIR and how to supervise Routine 2.
The student is used to help supervise V unit students as
his auditing activity with stress on case errors.
The remainder of the student's time is taken up with
preparation for examination for his HCA/HPA.
The student may be used for charity cases and what was
formerly Interne work.
SUMMARY
This is about a three months' course if steamed through. If
it takes longer, then the V unit was flubbed.
If a student hangs up longer than a reasonable time in any
upper phase, he is returned to the V unit and is required
to do and receive Routine 2 while continuing to try to pass
upper level check sheets so as not to hold him up.
Students are, of course, expected to study evenings and week-ends.
The three section course plan is adhered to of Theory,
Practical and Auditing.
Auditing in the Auditing Section is done for RESULTS, not
to teach auditing. Practical is where they practice.
Students are progressively assigned to their units and are
re-classed as they pass out of a unit.
The Model of this Course is Saint Hill but it may not be so
advertised.
The chief difference of course is the necessary
re-introduction of a student body tape programme such as in
the old days. The last hour of the day is used for this. A
sequence of about 75 tapes, mainly of general historical or
auditing interest, are played to the whole student body,
assembled in the main assembly hall, one tape each day,
regardless of the students' classification. They are given
quizzes on these tapes, very brief. No other tape use is
made in an Academy. There are no headphone recorders. If
tape play speakers are not good the students won't learn
anything from the tapes. When tapes are omitted as a whole
class activity, the whole direction, meaning and ethic of
Scientology goes sour in an area and the students haven't a
clue what Scientology is for and you find them idling about
driving off pcs with nutty chatter.
This Academy Curriculum requires a D of T and two
instructors. To this can be added a Training Admin who is
also Extension Course. The D of T becomes Auditing
Supervisor, the other two instructors are the Theory
Supervisor and Practical Supervisor.
The Classes are awarded on the Completion of the phase and
designate the check sheets. Students get cancelled out of
units but not off check sheets.
The only things that can keep students from passing through
this course rapidly are (a) failure to schedule precisely,
(b) failure to demand and obtain auditing results in all
units, (c) local non-comprehension of R2-12, (d) capricious
and unreal theory and practical examinations and (e)
failure to enforce the course regulations. A full Academy
will attend to all these things. An empty one will have
ignored them.
It is no real sin to do a lousy job of auditing. It is a
terrible crime to do a bad job of training and
dissemination because then there's nothing left to pick the
cases up in this life or the next. Every bad auditor we
turn out costs us a hundred preclears. Every good one puts
us closer to our objectives.
An Academy Class II should be good enough to go to work at
once as an HGC auditor without causing the HGC a moment's
worry.
It can be done because it must be.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright c 1962
by L.Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
002 HCOB 3 JAN 63 OPPOSITION LISTS, RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE
(TV5 p. 230-2, NTV VII p. 9-12)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
ROUTINE 2
IMPORTANT
OPPOSITION LISTS
RIGHT AND WRONG OPPOSE
Most PT terminals and oppterms look more like Coterms than
clean Terminals or Opposition Terminals when first
contacted. They become more definite Terms or Oppterms
after they have been listed a page. While you should be
able to make the right choice in most cases by the usual
test given in the 2-12 steps you can err.
Your lists will become endless and unnullable and your pc
will go downhill if you oppose an RI wrong way to.
Therefore, while listing, carefully observe the needle and
the pc. The TA is meaningless in this test. The Indications
for testing "Right Way Oppose" and "Wrong Way Oppose" are
the subject of this bulletin.
In opposing a Reliable Item you can consider it a Terminal
(because pc said it gave pain) and list "Who or What would
a Catfish oppose?" Whereas in actual fact it was an Oppterm
and should have been listed "Who or What would oppose a
Catfish?" Or Vice Versa. Sad consequences follow a wrong
choice.
POTENTIAL MISCALLING AN RI
Even the best auditor can make a mistake in calling an RI
he's gotten a Terminal or an Oppterm. The pc is foggy as to
what's pain or sensation. The RI may have both. Sometimes
Terminals are so covered with Sen there is no pain at
first. Sometimes the hidden Terminal is so hard down on the
Oppterm RI it seems like a Terminal.
Further, you can be doing an Opposition to an RI list,
expecting a Terminal to come up and get, in fact, another
Oppterm. This is fine. Accept it if the list only RSed once
on nulling. But the opposing Terminal is still hidden and
must be gotten. Pcs, you see, often put Terms and Oppterms
on the same list.
STABLE DATUM:
Always regard the identity of an RI as a Term or Oppterm as
potentially wrong until listed and tested as per this HCO
Bulletin. Do the best you can with usual tests to tell what
it is before you start listing and choose your oppose
question accordingly. But be ready to find that what was a
Terminal is really an Oppterm or vice versa and should have
been opposed "the other way around".
You have only two list questions to use in opposing a
Reliable Item. These are "Who or What would oppose a
__________ ?" and "Who or What would a __________ oppose?"
For every Reliable Item there is only one of the above
that is right. The other is wrong. There are no true
Coterms - they only seem to be both a Terminal (pain) and
an Oppterm (sensation).
When it comes to listing you will benefit the pc only by
listing the right way. The other oppose question then is
the wrong way.
If you list the "wrong way" (using the wrong question),
you'll get an ENDLESS LIST that never completes and won't nul.
You therefore have a choice of two questions and one of
them is right and the other wrong, always. If you choose
the right one and list it, the pc benefits. If you choose
the wrong one and list it the pc will get worse rapidly,
right in the session before your eyes.
It often happens that you start listing the wrong way. This
is because you failed to find out correctly if the RI you
were about to list an opposition list to was a Terminal
(pain) or an Opposition Terminal (sensation). The pc said
he had "sen" but actually felt "pain". Or the pc did have
"sen" and the pain appeared afterward. In short, because PT
Terminals look like Coterms very often, neither the pc nor
the auditor can tell on some RIs. This happens to some RIs
on every case.
The solution to the dilemma is to test by listing a page or two.
There are certain definite signs of wrong way opposition.
They can be seen with half an eye. There is no need to go
on until your pc is caved in and you have 99 pages of Items
to find out you can't nul and should have opposed the other
way around.
A list right way to or wrong way to will Rockslam, so
that's no test in itself. The tests, five in number, are a
little more delicate:
Aside from original tests for Term or Oppterm, how to tell
if an oppose list is right way to:
RIGHT WAY INDICATIONS
1. In Listing needle is loose and gets looser;
2. Pc's skin tone gets progressively better as he or she lists;
3. Masses move out off pc;
4. Pc gives Items easily;
5. List completes easily.
WRONG WAY OPPOSE INDICATIONS
If List is wrong way oppose (which is to say the wording is
reversed, such as "Who or What would oppose a Catfish?" as
different from "Who or What would a Catfish oppose?") these
things will always happen:
1. In listing, the needle gets tighter, stiff and tends to jerk.
It goes in cycles, DR, RS, DR, clean, DR, RS, DR, clean, etc;
2. The pc's skin tone gets progressively worse, darker and
off color and the pc looks older;
3. Masses move into the pc and make him feel more or less
squashed;
4. Pc gives Items with some small difficulty and tends to
invalidate them and RI being listed from;
5. List doesn't ever complete. You may be able to nul a while
but the needle will dirty up and no amount of Mid Ruds will
clean it.
Whether your list is right way oppose or wrong way oppose
the pc may get pain and sensation, even nausea. Indeed, be
worried only if the pc doesn't. These don't count. Pain and
Sensation are used for the first test you make in selection.
But aren't used beyond that test given in the Steps of 2-12.
It's the darkening color of the pc and his or her apparent
age that count. Your tests above are visual not getting data
from the pc. Pcs will list wrong way to and plow themselves
right on in with no complaint.
If you start listing wrong way to, and then turn it around,
the pc will have trouble giving right way to Items for a
bit, and then they come at a rapid easy flow and you get
all the above 5 things for the right way list. Unless you
change around to the right way and continue to list the
wrong way you will continue to get the 5 indications given
for wrong lists.
Sometimes an RI is so fouled up you have to test by listing
one way, then the other and then back to the first way again.
A little experience is solid gold, for you begin to see the
5 indications for right lists and the 5 indications for
wrong lists and recognize them more quickly.
When you have opposed wrongly and then, in opposing right
way to you get a complete list, you never bother to nul the
wrong way list. You just abandon it. The RI won't be on it.
You only nul the right way oppose list.
Rule: Never nul lists taken from wrong sources. Just abandon.
No list ever went to 50 pages that was right way to. Right
Way Oppose Lists that can be completed are probably all
below 500 Items, the usual being around 250 Items.
Wrong Way Oppose is the chief source of difficulty for any
opposition list, rivalled only by Incomplete Lists as a
trouble maker in Routine 2.
A wrong way oppose list is of course "Wrong Source" as one
is using "Catfish" as a Terminal instead of "Catfish" as an
Oppterm or vice versa.
Endless lists also come from just continuing to list on and
on and on, the pc's needle being dirty by "Protest". This
is just silly. Some supervisor may develop as a stable
datum, "If the needle is dirty, just continue listing." And
this is wrong. A needle does get clean when a right way
oppose list is completed. But wrong way oppose or Mid Ruds
Out can also make a needle dirty.
On an oppose list, if a needle is dirty three main things
can be wrong:
1. List is right way oppose but incomplete. Remedy:
Complete it to one RS only seen on nulling.
2. List is wrong way oppose. Remedy: Oppose it the other way
and watch the signs (above) until you're sure. Then go on and
complete.
3. Mid Ruds are out - pc protesting the session or overlisting.
Wrong Source (opposing a wrong item) can mess up a pc also.
But why'd you take an Item from an incomplete or wrong way
list in the first place and then oppose it? The remedy of
this one lies before the fact of wrong way oppose, so is
not the subject of this HCO Bulletin.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L.Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
006 BTB 14 JAN 63 RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS"
[Not in either set of tech volumes. This was originally an
HCOB and was later reissued as a BTB. We do not have the
original HCOB version, but this BTB should be close. It is
from a Level 0 pack of the late 70's. If someone has an older
unrevised version, please post it. - Ed.]
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
14 JANUARY 1963
REISSUED 25 JULY 1974 AS BTB
CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JANUARY 1963 SAME TITLE
Remimeo
All Auditors
RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS"
NOTE: This datum was already known to me about rings but
this is the most severe case I've heard of.
L. RON HUBBARD
The following dispatch, sent in by Terry Milner and Joe
Fortner, staff members of Los Angeles, describes a
phenomenon which can be caused by a PC wearing rings:
"A dispatch on a matter which I consider quite urgent. Since
being audited quite a few rock slams have been observed on
me. In the rudimentss, on lists, between comm lags, button
checks, in fact any method of auditing which required the
use of an E-Meter. With the advent of R2-12 I had many
lists, all chock full of items that had rock slammed at one
time or another.
The supposedly phantom rock slam served to hang up many
sessions and auditing became quite a drag even though one
true package was found in spite of the rock slams that went
on forever.
Recently I was sent to get HGC auditing and the rock slams
were ever present until my Auditor, Joe Fortner, got a
little suspicious and had me take off the two rings I wore,
one on either hand.
They disappeared. Hundreds of things that had rock slammed
no longer rock slammed.
Hundreds of almost, not quite reliable items are dead now
and in all truth, most them have no meaning to me anyway.
Perhaps you know of this condition set up by the PC wearing
rings.......the thing is most audititors do not, nor do
most PCs.
Revised by
Training & Services Aide
Approved by
L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:LRH:RS:rs
Copyright c 1963, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
009 HCOPL 15 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2-12
(OEC vol 4 p 563, NTV VII p. 13)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Central Orgs
AIl HGCs
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 JANUARY 1963
ROUTINE 2-12
When the six lectures of 8 Jan., 10 Jan. and 15 Jan. 63 are
in your hands and understood by staff auditors, the Sec EDs
banning Routine 2-12 on HGC pcs are at end.
These lectures alter to some extent the original format of
Routines 2-10 and 2-12 by removing arbitrary assessment
lists and using only lists completed by the pc.
All case repair data is also contained in these lectures.
They also give methods of avoiding endless lists, dead horses
and skunks.
HCOBs will eventually condense all this material. However,
various emergencies have inhibited the condensation and
correction of the data except in lecture form.
The above-mentioned lectures take priority over and correct
all earlier bulletins and lectures, as they contain two
months' experience in observing errors being made in
application by auditors, needful indicators and correction
of points that were giving trouble.
Routine 2 is being in general very successful and has been
getting better case gains than any earlier process.
However, Routine 2 is complicated and exact and can worsen
cases where applied without complete knowledge. It is
urgent that Objective One be completed and that auditors
who have no R2-12 seal have this pointed out to them.
Squirrel versions should be mercilessly stamped on, as they
cannot compete with the thousands of hours of case experience
which has gone into creating Routine 2, and can bring disrepute
to Scientology.
Accurate R2 repairs inaccurate R2 and is the only process that
will repair it.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
011 HCOB 27 JAN 63 ROUTINE 2 SIMPLIFIED
(TV5 p. 233-8, NTV VII p. 14-21)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
CenOCon
Franchise
Students
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 JANUARY 1963
URGENT
ROUTINE 2 - SIMPLIFIED
(Communicator: Mimeo AT ONCE and RUSH TO ALL TECH DIVISIONS)
I will shortly release Routine 2-12A which will incorporate
Routine 2-10 and 2-12 with enormous simplification.
While the basic processes and purposes remain the same, I
have worked out a number of simplifications that are
greatly needed.
Having seen some of the trouble with R2-10 and 12, I have
been furiously working to improve Indicators. I've now
proved out some invariable indicators that will completely
wipe out flubs if followed exactly as given in this HCO
Bulletin. If they don't work for you, the R2 being done is
from wrong source. These indicators are not wrong.
I have also succeeded in developing a system in 2-12A that
eliminates nulling, thus saving half the auditing time, and
eliminates Tiger Drilling - a weak spot for HPAs. As the
sessions can be run with almost no Mid Ruds or ruds, this
leaves auditors with only an RS to see on the meter and
cuts out almost all other meter reading. R2 then comes much
more easily into the realm of Co-Audit.
If you don't get results from R2 it's being done wrong.
I've got the variables pretty well licked.
Until the full release of R2-12A, incorporate these changes
which belong to 2-12A into any R2 you are doing or
supervising. Change over at once. Abandon the old way where
it conflicts as these data below will keep you out of
trouble and stop some of the glaring errors being done.
Apply these below to any 2-10 or 2-12 currently being done.
TONE ARM
The Tone Arm is used in R2-12A.
On any list done on a preclear, whether source, represent
or oppose, RUN ALL THE TONE ARM ACTION OUT OF THE LISTING.
LIST AT LEAST 50 ITEMS BEYOND THE POINT THE TONE ARM BECAME
MOTIONLESS.
Keep the tone arm readings in the left margin of the list
column. Note TA action about every 5 Items or at every change.
In a wrong-way-to oppose list, the TA tends to be more stationary.
If you don't run the TA action out and at least 50 Items
beyond, plus 50 Items beyond the last RS seen on listing,
the list will be incomplete.
Sometimes several pages have to be listed with a motionless
TA before the final RS comes on the list but ordinarily the
final RS comes within 50 Items after the TA has been
motionless for 50 Items.
LIST BEYOND LAST RS
List at least 50 Items beyond the last RS on the list. Do
not stop listing with the last RSing Item. If you do you
can be fooled. If you get a new RS in the 50, list 50 more
beyond that and so on.
TEST LIST BOTH WAYS
List a few Items on each way oppose as a conclusive test to
find right way oppose. The needle gets stiffer on the wrong
way oppose. THE NEEDLE LOOKS LOOSER ON RIGHT WAY OPPOSE. If
you still can't decide, again test either way until you are
sure.
Use all normal tests but list a little each way to be sure.
WRONG WAY LIST
A list is wrong way to if
1. The list doesn't RS.
2. The RSes on the list increase in incidence - more RSes per
Item on later pages. (The number is quite marked.)
3. The pc looks darker and mass is pulling in on the pc.
4. The list is inordinately long - 40-50 pages.
5. The needle gets tighter and stiffer as you list (the most
noticeable test). (A needle also gets tighter on an added to
list if you didn't read the right Item to the pc.)
VANISHED RS
If a case has RSed and suddenly can't be made to no matter
what you do, the RS is swallowed into some earlier
incomplete or fumbled action.
Go back and handle the earlier action correctly.
Sometimes an Item grabbed off an incomplete source list
(but never use one that was found by representing an RSing
Item) has to be handled fully to get the RS back. Example:
Incomplete Parts of Existence List. "God" RSed heavily on
it. Some auditor grabbed it and opposed it. List abandoned
when directions came to use Items only from complete source
lists.
Eight Reliable Items later, RSes on the case vanish or get
tiny. Pc's PTPs heavy and not being resolved by R2.
Solution: Go back and get the "God" package complete. The
big RS will come back on. (Make sure it's opposed right way
to this time.)
FOUR ITEM PKGs
The biggest change from 2-12 to 2-12A is the four Item Package.
Always get four Items in a row.
Complete any existing 2 or 3 Item packages on a case to 4
Items whether the last Reliable Item found still RSes or not.
The four are:
(1) Reliable Item taken from a completed source list.
(2) Reliable Item taken by opposing (1).
(3) Reliable Item taken by opposing (2).
(4) Reliable Item taken by opposing (3).
It will be found that (4) is in opposition also to (1) if
all was done correctly.
All lists (1) to (4) must be complete, to no TA action and
beyond, right-way-to opposition in each case.
Where a represent enters in (which is seldom), there are
five lists for four Items.
These are:
(1) Source list (complete to no TA for 50 Items but no RS).
(2) Represent list from last Item in on source list. This
is RSing Item. This is the first RI. List must be complete.
(3) Oppose list on RI found in (2) just above. This gives
second RI.
(4) Oppose list on RI found in (3). This gives third RI.
(5) Oppose list or RI found in (4). This gives fourth RI.
Whether you get your first RI from an oppose or represent
list, you always wind up with 4 RIs.
PACKAGING
A package always consists of Two RIs that are terminals and
Two RIs that are oppterms.
The terminals oppose either oppterm, one better than the other.
This is two packages 2-12 style, one pkg 2-12A style.
The Term-Oppterm of each pair must be of same order of magnitude.
The auditor has no business with the significances of
Items. He never suggests an Item or goal. He never rejects
one because of significance.
Here is an actual package. 1st RI found, Oppterm RELIGION;
2nd RI found, Terminal A CONQUEROR; 3rd RI found, Oppterm
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS; 4th RI found, Terminal A DISEMBODIED
SPIRIT.
PACKAGE
TERM Oppterm
A Disembodied Spirit -----> Religion
\ /
\------\ /-----/
X
/------/ \-------\
/ \
A Conqueror ----------> Public Communications
[Ed. note: in the diagram, each of the two terminals has an arrow
pointed at each of the two oppterms, giving 4 lines with the two
center ones crossing over each other in the middle]
In a 2-12A package you have to have 2 terminals and two
oppterms, opposing and cross opposing as above.
Otherwise you've goofed and will the pc hedge and ARC
break! Oh, my!
The sequence may be (1) Oppterm RI, (2) Term RI, (3)
Oppterm RI, (4) Term RI, or it may be (1) Represent Item,
(2) Oppterm RI, (3) Term RI, (4) Oppterm RI, (5) Term RI.
Or it may be (1) Term RI, (2) Oppterm RI, (3) Term RI, (4)
Oppterm RI, or (1) Represent Item, (2) Term RI, (3) Oppterm
RI, (4) Term RI, (5) Oppterm RI.
Always 4 RIs, always 2 Terms, always 2 Oppterms.
If they don't come out that way then one of the lists was
wrong way to or incomplete or both.
NULLING
R2-12A doesn't nul a full RSing list. Only a non-RS list to
be represented gets nulled. And these are infrequently needed.
One completes the list to no TA action plus 50 or more
Items and then 50 Items beyond the last RS seen on listing.
The 50-50 rule is minimum, not maximum. It sometimes must
be more.
One tells the pc that one is going to read him the next to
last RS and does so. If it RSes, one adds to the list until
a new RSing Item is seen and 50 Items beyond it. Then one
reads the now next to last RSing Item again. (No Tiger
Drill.) Auditor tells pc: "This is the next to the last
RSing Item, not THE Item."
When the next to last RSing Item does not RS on reading it
to the pc (no TD), one then tells the pc that his or her
Item will now be read and reads the LAST RSing Item to the
pc. It should RS without TD. If the next to the last Item
did RS, one does not read the last RSing Item to the pc but
just returns to listing. If the RS is off the last Item
seen to RS read the non-RSing Items just before and just
after it, always to be sure. The RS could have been noted
for the wrong Item.
When one has read it to the pc and seen it RS, the auditor
says, "That Rook Slams" and watches the pc. The auditor
does no other action for a while, says nothing else. To
speak or engage in new actions will rip the pc's attention
to shreds. This is a critical moment. One watches the pc's
face to see if it darkens or lightens. Darkens = wrong
Item. Lightens = right Item. (Watch the area below the pc's
eyes, the eye pouches.) Pc doesn't know if it's his Item or
not = wrong Item. Pc knows it's his Item == Right Item. Pc
ARC breaks shortly or gets critical of auditor = wrong
Item. Pc happier = right Item. Pc doesn't cognite = wrong
Item. Pc cognites = right Item.
While pc is cogniting auditor will see the Item continue to
RS on the meter. The RS may fade out or narrow as pc
cognites. This does not mean wrong Item necessarily.
Even if the RS vanishes after a good bit (5 minutes?) (no
TD) it is still opposed. (3) is more likely to fade than
(1) and (2) RIs. (2) is more likely to fade than (1) RI.
(4) fades almost at once.
The Item must always be the last RS on the list and must
always RS the first few times read without Tiger Drill
(providing session rudiments are even vaguely in).
If you aren't sure of the RSes while listing, nul for RS
only from the one above the next to last Item to the end of
list. Don't nul whole list ever.
If an added portion has an RS on it there is no need to nul
earlier than it either as no earlier RS will exist. However
always test next to last RS. If two RSes appear before a
list is added to (next to last and last) or if any two
Items on a list RS before a list is added to, that list is
incomplete and does not have the Item on it.
WRONG ITEM SIGNS
A wrong Item given to the pc as his Item does the following:
1. Darkens pc's eye shadows and face;
2. Pc immediately has more mass than before pc was told Item;
3. TA tends to stay up and stuck;
4. Pc slightly or greatly ARC breaks;
5. Pc doesn't cognite at all or cognites briefly and stops
(and ARC breaks);
6. Pc can't really understand how it is his Item, but sometimes is
propitiatively agreeable with no cognitions;
7. Pc can't really see how it fits in package but may say
so diffidently.
RIGHT ITEM SIGNS
A right Item given to the pc as his Item does the following:
1. Lightens pc's eye shadows and face;
2. Pc has no more mass about him than before Item was read to him;
3. TA usually blows down;
4. Pc feels more cheerful;
5. Pc cognites, usually at length;
6. Pc sees just how it is his Item;
7. Pc sees how it fits against other Items in any package.
The auditor must check up on all 7 points above as well as
the RS, making 8 points in all.
If the wrong indicators aren't present and neither are the
right ones, list on further. Don't be a niggardly lister.
Another hour's listing can save 50 hours case repair.
DIRTY NEEDLE
Lists that never go clean needle are wrong way to.
You never end up a list with a Dirty needle if you run all
the TA action out on a right way oppose list.
You don't have to have a clean needle anyway on this type
of nulling.
RS MATCHING
The RS you see on the first RI of any package exactly
repeats itself in width and speed on each one of the other
3 RIs in a 4 RI package.
It is the same RS when listed and when called, also.
A package has a characteristic RS. If one of the Items
doesn't match the RS, it's wrong. If none of the 4 RSes
seen are similar, run don't walk to the nearest Academy and
as soon as the pc gets out of the hospital send him to an HGC.
The RSes in one package all match exactly when first seen
and first called to pc. Of course after a few cognitions RI
(3) and RI (4) of the package may lose their RSes, but not
for a while and usually only after being listed.
An RS is gone when it's listed against.
You only have one RS of a package of 4 RIs RSing at any one time.
RI (1) RSes until listed. Then RI (2) RSes until listed, etc.
RSes that grind out on packaging were wrong Items.
You never audit an RI in any way but listing for another RI.
Your memory and a note of width are your only tools in
matching RSes on a package.
USING ARC BREAKS
Use any ARC Break to determine that the R2 is wrong. There
is no other reason for an ARC break, no matter what the pc
says. The R2 is wrong. That's the reason for the ARC break.
You use ARC breaks to verify the R2. The pc will not ARC
break on right R2 no matter what provocation exists in the
auditing.
ARC Break always equals Wrong Routine 2.
Wrong Item, Item wrong way to in oppose. List Incomplete.
These are what cause ARC breaks, not the auditing. Never
forget that.
Never try to cure an R2 ARC break with Mid Ruds or missed
W/Hs. Go back to work on the R2 line-up.
Example: "Your Item is 'A Cat'." Pc says ok, soon begins to
chop auditor. Correct action, "Your Item is not 'A Cat'. I
will examine this." That's the end of the ARC break just
like that. Pc doesn't realize the wrong Item is it. He
thought it was the auditor. The auditor now looks over his
list to see if it's wrong source or wrong way to or
incomplete and proceeds accordingly.
The Rule is ALWAYS GO BACK FROM AN ARC BREAK. NEVER
UNDERTAKE A BRAND NEW ACTION such as changing the universe.
New lists do not cure ARC breaks. Only doing the old list
right or finding the right Item cures them.
This is also the dominant rule in case repair: Find the
earliest ARC break and remedy what was being done just
before it.
Use ARC breaks to guide your R2. Don't ever Q and A with
them or try to handle with auditing. Never stop the
auditing on one. Just correct the R2 fast.
CASE REPAIR
In repairing cases all you do is look over earlier reports
until you find the session where the goals went sour and
correct what was done in that or the immediate earlier
session. Very simple. You'll also find the RS if it has
vanished off the case.
Never start new actions on a case that needs repair. Only
repair old ones. It's a screaming auditing goof, a major
error to start a new action on such a case.
DOPE OFF
All dope off and boil off while listing or nulling comes
from ordinary garden variety missed withholds. Pull them
rapidly and go on. In R2 you only pull missed W/Hs when you
can't get pc into session at all or when the pc dopes off.
You don't pull missed W/Hs in case on an ARC break - you
correct the R2.
Pc going into apathy is also an ARC break you know. Also
propitiation.
NEVER REP AN RS ITEM
Never represent an RSing Item. But NEVER. Don't handle or
use "RIs" that came from representing an RSing Item. Some
were gotten this way in 3GAXX. They're wrong. Abandon them
fast.
Always test a source you are going to use for a represent
list for an RS. If it RSes don't represent it. Don't oppose
it either as it's off some incomplete list. Find a
non-RSing thing to represent instead.
There's another version of this also. A pc asked to extend
a list (or seeing the auditor's paper as the auditor lists)
will use Items that RS to try to get the RSing Item on the
list. This is fatal and will increase the number of RSes on
the list and make the pc ill, give him the wrong item and
so on.
When you see a pc doing this tell him or her, "Just answer
the auditing question. Please just answer it. The Item
we're looking for probably isn't even related to any RS
gotten so far."
Make the pc answer the auditing question only.
A pc may also seek to package when listing Items, not
answer the auditing question. An educated pc knows that RI
(4) must match RI (1). Get the pc off it. "Just answer the
auditing question." And you'll be out of trouble.
Some pcs have listed 40 pages without once answering the
auditing question.
SELF LISTING
Getting the pc to list out of session as in goals is a poor
idea in R2.
Give the pc an Item wrong way to and he'll wrap himself
around a telephone pole out of session.
List R2 processes in session only.
You would have to nul the whole list if it's listed out of
session. Where's the time saved?
NEVER STEER ITEMS
Some eager beavers have started steering the pc to Items
while listing, using the needle flicks.
Never do it.
You get Items that don't belong and all sorts of things.
Just be simple, huh?
Routine 2 is as good as you simply audit simply. So relax
and start clearing.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
012 Ed. Note: OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES
OMISSION OF R3M IN THE OLD TECH VOLUMES
[Ed. The following note is on the bottom of page 239 in TV5 at the
end of HCOB 11 Feb 63 "Current Auditing" (included below). It
does not appear in the New Tech Volumes since this material is
included and is no longer considered confidential by CofS]
(R3M and R3N as developments are not included in these volumes.
They will be found on courses to which they apply.)
==================
013 HCOB 1 FEB 63 ROUTINE 3, URGENT, ALL CL III AND IV AUDITORS
(NTV VII p. 23-27, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 FEBRUARY AD 13
Central Orgs
Missions Air Mail
Class III & IV
Auditors
ROUTINE 3
URGENT-URGENT-URGENT
ALL CLASS III & IV AUDITORS
Communicators: Get this data into the hands of
any auditor running goals on pcs, fast.
There is a probable bug in the listing of all previous
Routine 3 processes. I have been studying this for some
time to solve why we are getting too few Clears after the
goal is found. And why they are sometimes unclear after
their needle frees.
The answer comes out of Routine 2-12. Never represent a
rock slamming item. A rocket read as on a goal often
follows this rule and becomes never represent a rocket
reading item.
ln all previous R3 we were representing the rocket reading
goal in two of the four lines and opposing it backwards in
the remaining two.
People went Clear on the four, sixteen and other multiple
lines but something must have been wrong as others didn't.
Therefore abandon at once any listing on any older line series.
A goal may be listed only on "Who or what does the goal
oppose?" Never on who or what would want or not want the
goal as that approximates a represent line to some cases.
Do not list anything but goal-oppose. Never list even
oppose-goal.
I learned all this shaping up Routine 2.
___________
Wrong goals are still dynamite. But this newly developed
listing below helps prove a goal out.
Goal reliable items rocket read. If a goal won't yield RR
reliable items it's probably wrong.
In Routine 2, you use rock slams. The bigger the rock slam
the better it will go for the pc.
In Routine 3 you use rocket reads, never rock slams.
Routines 2 and 3 therefore do not mix. While you may
encounter and use rocket reads in Routine 2, don't mix
goals into it. Goals just naturally emerge in doing Routine
2. When they check out, get the pc run on Routine 3. In
Routine 3 you wholly ignore rock slams and use only rocket
reads.
To fill the gap I have put Routine 3MX together as a
theoretical process.
___________
OLD GOALS
Use your pc's already-found goal. Prepcheck it back to a
rocket read and use Routine 3MX from there on.
___________
ROUTINE 3MX
For Experimental Use by Class III and
IV Auditors and Z Unit SHSBC
INTRODUCTION
Routine 3MX is released as experimental. It is however
already well worked out and as soon as I find any and all
bugs, the X will be dropped.
R3MX uses all I've learned about listing items in R2 and
applies it to listing out goals.
For the moment Z Unit of the SHSBC will use only R3MX,
utilizing goals already found on R2MX Method A.
ASSESSING FOR GOALS
METHOD A
Assessment for goals in R3MX Method A is by meter listing
and rocket read.
After doing R2-12A on the pc and a good prepcheck,
particularly on former goals work, one has the pc list
goals in session on the meter. One lists the tone arm
action out and goes well beyond. If the pc has already
listed goals with none found list more on the pc to check
for TA action. If it exists list it out.
One looks for and notes goals that rocket read.
One then takes these rocket reading goals and tiger drills
them, preferably the last one that rocket read first as it
is the most likely.
If pc ARC breaks, the list is probably incomplete according
to R2 findings. So complete it.
Don't list, in Method A, goals from items or detour. Just
go on and on listing goals.
Do a Prepcheck on goals every fourth session.
The list may go to 2,000 goals. But if it goes so high or
beyond, the pc needs more R2-12A.
METHOD B
R3MX Method B uses the ten lists of 3GAXX but uses any
Routine 2 reliable item that still rock slams or one
preferably that rocket reads. This method is not covered in
this HCOB but will be familiar to Saint Hillers.
METHOD C
R3MX Method C uses R2-12A until the goal starts pushing up
and the pc starts insisting upon it without any prompting
from the auditor.
One does not grab the goal. The auditor notes it down.
If one keeps on doing R2-12A well, the goal will eventually
rocket read easily for a checkout.
Rock slams on a case indicate a lot of distance down to
rocket reads.
METHOD D
R3MX Method D uses Problems Intensives until the goal appears.
This has happened in many cases.
GOAL CHECKOUT
The goal must rocket read three times in three to be used
for listing.
If not, do more R2-12A and check the goal out later.
LISTING GOALS OUT
Goals listing was a more serious hazard in Routine 3 than
finding goals.
This simplified listing, while as yet theoretical in some
respects, should be easier than any earlier listing.
It is done like R2-12A but by rocket reads only.
LINE ASSESSMENT
One takes the goal found, makes sure that it rocket reads
well (not rock slams) and assesses as follows:
Use the pain-sensation analysis of the goal. If pain (as it
should be) one tests: "Who or what would the goal ‘To be a
Tiger oppose?' " Or, "Who or what would ‘Being a Tiger
oppose?' " (the ‘ing' form of the goal). One or the other
question should rocket read. Use that one.
We list just this one list on the goal itself and after
that use reliable items that rocket read.
Using long sheets of paper with the pc's name, date and
line question on every sheet, we write down all the items
called off by the pc. We mark rock slams and rocket reads
as we see them.
We list to a still TA and then 50 items at least beyond and
50 items beyond the last rocket read (not a rock slam ever).
We don't null the list.
We read the next to last rocket read to the pc and then the
last rocket read item (and the item just above and below)
and see if the tests of 2-12A hold good (cogs, no ARC
break, sudden drop of TA, lightening face color, etc.). If
so, it's the pc's reliable item.
We now begin the "Spiral Staircase." We oppose and oppose
and oppose and oppose and oppose always according to
whether term or oppterm as long as we can as follows:
We determine if the reliable item is a term or oppterm by
calling it off to the pc for pain or sensation and then by
test listing both-ways-to on the oppose. The wrong way
tightens the needle and gives no real TA action. The right
way loosens the needle and gives good TA action.
Example: We found "Kitten" as the reliable item. We test
for pain or sensation on it and find it gave pain. (Term)
We list "Who or what would oppose a kitten?" then "Who or
what would a kitten oppose?" and, guided by our test (pain)
also and a loosening needle and moving TA, we complete the
list, "Who or what would a kitten oppose?"
We list to a still TA and 50 items or more beyond and 50
past the last rocket read.
We give the pc the next to last item that rocket read on
listing, then the last rocket read item. We watch for the
signs. (If it isn't right we go on listing.) If there are
two rocket reads still firing on the list it is incomplete
and we must complete it. Thus we find our reliable item.
In short we find reliable item after reliable item just
exactly as above each time but always by rocket read, not
rock slam. This is a "Spiral Staircase" down toward the
Rock and Opp Rock.
We pay no further heed to the goal until our "Spiral
Staircase" folds up on us. No more rocket reads on the
lists or bank getting too solid.
In brief, when we run out of reliable items, we go back to
the goal we were using, we test it, mildly prepcheck it
(put the big mid ruds in on it) and try to revive it. If it
sparks up, rocket reads again or reads, we do all the above
steps, the assessment from the 2 questions, the list, the
first reliable item, the "Spiral Staircase" again.
If we can't get a peep out of the old goal, and our
auditing was good, we just do another Goals Assessment and
find a new goal that rocket reads and start all over again.
___________
As soon as I find what mistakes can be made, I'll recodify
and we'll have an improved R3-21 and I'll take the X off.
___________
We need Clears as we've never needed them before and we
need them now and we therefore need simpler, faster
clearing. I've got R2 smoothed out in R2-12A and it's a
real doll. Now I'm smoothing out R3-21 using everything
learned in watching R2-12 in use, but using rocket reads
not rock slams.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
014 HCOPL 8 FEB 63 CURRICULUM CHANGE
(OEC Vol 4 p 424, NTV VII p. 28)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 FEBRUARY 1963
Sthil
Info Ds of T
CURRICULUM CHANGE
The following change in auditing for Units will go into
effect Monday, 11 Feb. 63.
Y UNIT
Y Unit will revert to missed withholds and Prepchecking and
will complete a Goals Prepcheck. All Y Unit auditing will
be meterless, specializing in the observation of the pc,
particularly coloration and apparent age.
Theory and practical for this unit will specialize on R3MX.
Any 2-12A cycle now in progress in Y may be completed by
the current class.
R2-12A will be struck from all checksheets as fast as replaced
by R3MX data.
R2-12A will be done in V Unit only. Routine 3MX only will be
done in Z Unit.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
015 HCOPL 9 FEB 63 SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS
(OEC V4 p 425)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 FEBRUARY 1963
BPI
SAINT HILL COURSE GOALS
Students attending the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course
will hereafter be terminated and returned only when clear.
As this action, by current technology, is not a lengthy
process, (only very exact), it is not anticipated that the
course length forecast of 16-20 weeks will suffer any great
change.
Current students are being held to complete this desirable
goal. New students are some of them even now being cleared
in the V unit before actually beginning course.
Any retread student is acceptable on course and can be
promised now to begin getting clear the first week on
course. Retread is forecast as eight weeks where the
student has his goal already.
The Practical Section has been strengthened to ensure
accuracy and fast passage. The Theory Section is being
simplified as all materials are being converted rapidly to
the exact needs of auditing and clearing.
Saint Hill is gearing up for a busy spring and summer. We
now have around sixty students and seven supervisors and
instructors. Most of these students will have graduated,
cleared, in March or April. We have only two "hung up"
students who have not been able to pass course requirements
over a long period, and these are both of them now being
cleared and should be first goal clears by March.
Morale level on the course has never been higher. Saint
Hill staff is clearing itself on a co-audit basis and all
should be first goal clears by mid spring.
You may have been waiting for Saint Hill to start producing
clears on an everyone basis.
This is now successfully in progress amongst students and
instructors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================