No matching fragments found in this document.
From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Tue Jun 08 14:40:42 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!intermedia!WCG!kiowa!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 8 Jun 1999 21:40:42 -0000
Subject: FZBA 10/14 repost SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <161abd3b823378aa8cf390369e3a725d@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 2182
Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:806424 alt.clearing.technology:84542
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME
SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 10 (repost)
**************************************************
The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of:
1. The Old Tech Volumes
2. The New Tech Volumes
3. Confidential Material
4. BTBs
5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech
6. Anything else appropriate that we can find
They do not include
a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those)
b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately)
Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice
as much material as the old tech volumes), and because
the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the
years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each
year as a separate volume.
The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and
repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the
remaining parts to keep the size down.
**************************************************
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
115 HCOB 23 JUL 63 AUDITING RUNDOWN, MISSED W\Hs, TO BE RUN IN X1 UNIT
(TV5 p. 328, NTV VII p. 242)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JULY 1963
Central Orgs for info
Sthil
SHSBC
AUDITING RUNDOWN
MISSED WITHHOLDS
TO BE RUN IN X 1 UNIT
(supersedes HCO Bulletin of July 11, 1963, same title,
which was issued to Sthil SHSBC only)
1. Ask pc following question:
"In this lifetime what have you done that you have
withheld from someone?"
2. When pc has answered ask:
(a) "When was it?"
(b) "Where was it?"
(c) "Who failed to find out about it?"
(d) "Who nearly found out about it?"
(e) "Who still doesn't know about it?"
Each withhold and answer must be written down and the sheet
of withholds and answers must be turned in with the
auditing report.
The sheet will be made available to all instructors on the
Briefing Course.
The above suggestion was made by Bernie Pesco, Saint Hill
Special Briefing Course student, and accepted for use.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.jh
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
116 HCOPL 23 JUL 63 RETREADS ON SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
(OEC V4 p 432)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 JULY 1963
Orgs
Sthil
Franchise
RETREADS ON SAINT HILL SPECIAL BRIEFING COURSE
Students on the Special Briefing Course who require leave
of absence for emergencies may do so under the following
conditions, otherwise they will be charged a retread fee
irrespective of the length of time they have already been
on Course.
2 weeks absence (with permission only)
3 months (by very special arrangements beforehand).
Other than that, any student leaving Course for any reason
whatsoever will be charged a retread fee on returning. No
part of the original fee is returnable.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.cden.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
117 HCOB 24 JUL 63 R3N CORRECTIONS
(Not in either set of tech volumes)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF JULY 24, AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
R3N
CORRECTIONS
This HCO Bulletin corrects HCO Bulletin of July 14, AD13.
Please note and attach to all copies HCO Bulletin of July
14, AD13 and HCO Bulletin of April 17, AD13.
LINE PLOT RI
Omit the fourth paragraph of the HCO Bulletin of July 14,
AD13. Substitute "In the pattern change "Beings (People)
(Those) who goal" to "Beings who (last word of goal)" for a
non "To Be" goal and "beings who are (last word of goal"
for a to be type of goal. Example: for To Find, the RI is
"Beings who find".
For "To Be Dead", the RI is "Beings Who Are Dead".
DATE CHANGES
Due to the track grouping incidents in the Between Lives
Implants, the actual periods of the goal types have been
hard to verify. I have now done this and the following is a
table of the actual periods as verified.
Correct all prior dates given where they are at variance
with this table: (All trillions given are one million million)
Heletrobus Implants
38.2 trillion years ago to
52 trillion years ago
Aircraft Door Implants
216 trillion years ago to
315 trillion years ago
The Gorilla Goals
319 trillion years ago to
83 trillion trillion trillion years ago
The Bear Goals
83 trillion trillion trillion years ago to about
40.7 trillion trillion trillion years ago
The Glade Implants
(Called Black Thetan in the discussion on
HCO Bulletin of July 14, AD13. Please change to
"Glade Implants"
40.7 trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago to
5.9 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago
The Invisible Picture Goals
5.9 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago to
(Found but not fully determined yet)
The Minion Implants
Not yet determined to
Not yet determined
Pattern not determined yet
An Undetermined Series
That goes "Sleep, Sleep, Sleep,
Sleep, Sleep, Don't Sleep, Can't Sleep"
And other commands similarly arranged,
which may be the first GPM.
______________
There are at least two series of Time Grouping Type
Implants that strech and restimulate and date first
trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago of
the Time Track from the Year Zero. One of these extends
from Present Time back to one's arrival on Earth. Another
similar one may be earlier. These sometimes interfere with
years ago dating. There dates from beginning of track are
correct, however.
FALSE PICTURE IMPLANTS
There are several of these, the Darwinian Implant being the
most notable in recent times.
______________
The earliest Implant found yet is "The Story of Creation"
which contains multiple endings and false durations (it is
about 7 1 / 2 weeks long) and some purposefully
indecipherable pictures. It is around 70 trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years ago.
THE LENGTH OF TRACK
The best current data on the lenght of the time track is
estimated at about one trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion or less. The earliest
date yet found is "The Story of Creation", but an earlier
incident is known to exist.
(Note: Correct also the note at the end of HCO Bulletin of
July 14, AD13. Instead of: "All trillions used are U.S.
trillions which are 1,000 million"
It should be corrected to:
"All trillions used are U.S. trillions which are 1,000,000
million (one million million)"
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr
Copyright � 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
118 BTB 26 JUL 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY COACHING THEORY
[Not in either set of tech volumes. This was originally an
HCOB and was later reissued as a BTB. We do not have the
original HCOB version, but this BTB should be close. It is
from an SHSBC pack circa 1980. Note that it has been REVISED
rather than simply re-issued. If someone has an older unrevised
version, please post it. - Ed.]
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
26 JULY 1963R
Revised & Reissued 6 December 1974 as BTB
CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 26 JULY 1963 SAME TITLE
Remimeo
Supervisors
Students
Estos
Central Orgs
Tech Depts
TRAINING TECHNOLOGY
COACHING THEORY MATERIAL
All stress in the Theory Section of the Course is on
duplicating and understanding the correct data.
The student must duplicate the data before he can
understand it. However, simple duplication with the use of
"a memory machine" does not mean that the understanding is
present.
If the student understands the data, he will find that he
has little difficulty in duplicating, retaining and
applying it.
I have tried out a method of coaching theory on the Saint
Hill Special Briefing Course that has gotten amazing
results when it was correctly applied.
"WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THAT MEANS?"
COACHING ORILL
The student and the coach sit opposite each other, each
holding a copy of the material to be learned.
STEP ONE: The coach has the student read aloud the rule,
axiom, definition, sentence or short paragraph to be
learned. (The coach must ask for only one major thought at
a time.) When the student has read what was asked for, the
coach acknowledges. The coach repeats this step until the
student reads the exact material as written.
STEP TWO: The coach asks the exact question, "What do you
consider that means?" and always acknowledges whatever
answer the student gives.
STEP THREE: Repeat Step One and Step Two until the student
duplicates the material to be learned in response to the
question, "What do you consider that means?" The coach then
asks the question, "Do you understand what it means?" If
the student doesn't or is not sure the coach gets the
student to define each word on the line, clearing up any
that he was not sure of or hesitated over�with a good
dictionary. The coach makes sure that all definitions of a
word are cleared and gets the student to use them in
sentences until he undersrands them. Then he repeats Steps
One and Two until the student is able to duplicate the
material and understands what it means.
The coach then takes up the next major thought.
SAMPLE "WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THAT MEANS?"
COACHING SESSION
COACH: Read the 1st ARC Break Rule aloud.
STUDENT: All ARC Breaks are caused by by-passed charge.
COACH: Good. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: Well .... (pause) .... All ARC Breaks are caused
by by-passed charge.
COACH: Thank you. Do you understand what it means?
STUDENT: Yes. All ARC Breaks are caused by BY-PASSED CHARGE.
COACH: VERY GOOD. Now read the 2nd ARC Break Rule.
STUDENT: To turn off an ARC Break find and indicate the
by-passed charge. (Left out "correct".)
COACH: O.K. Read that again.
STUDENT: To turn off an ARC Break find and indicate the
... Oh .... CORRECT by-passed charge.
COACH: Thank you. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: (Goes into an explanation)
COACH: (When student is finished) Thank you. Read the 2nd
ARC Break Rule.
STUDENT: (Does so.)
COACH: Thank you. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: (Shorter explanation.)
COACH: Thank you. Read it again.
STUDENT: (Does so. )
COACH: Thank you. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: Let's see .... In order to handle an ARC Break
find and indicate the by-passed charge?
COACH: Thank you. Read it again.
STUDENT: To turn off an ARC Break find and indicate the
correct by-passed charge.
COACH: Good. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: To turn off an ARC Break find and indicate the
correct by-passed charge.
COACH: Thank you. Do you understand what it means?
STUDENT: Yes.
COACH: Good. Read the next sentence.
STUDENT: Charge can be by-passed by, One, going later than
basic on any chain without further search for basic.
COACH: Good. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: Well .... You can by-pass charge by going after
something closer to present time than the basic on the
chain and stopping there without further search for basic.
COACH: (Exact word for word duplication not being necessary
for something not in capital letters) Good. Do you
understand what it means?
STUDENT: Yes.
COACH: Good. Read the next sentence. (Etc.)
ANOTHER EXAMPLE
COACH: Read the 1st ARC Break Rule.
STUDENT: All ARC Breaks are caused by by-passed charge.
COACH: Good. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: All ARC Breaks are caused by by-passed charge.
COACH: Thank you. Do you understand what it means?
STUDENT: I'm not sure.
COACH: Has the student define each word and c/ears up any
word he is not sure of with a good dictionary. The coach
makes sure that all definitions of a word are c/eared and
gets the student to use them in sentences until he
understands them.
STUDENT: (Does so.)
COACH: Good. What do you consider that means?
STUDENT: (Gives an explanation.)
COACH: Good. (Continues Steps One and Two until student
gives exact duplication of the rule in response to "What do
you consider that means?") Good. Do you understand what it means?
STUDENT: Yes
COACH: Good. Read the 2nd ARC Break Rule. (Etc.)
TIPS TO COACHES
The exactness of duplication required is dependent on the
importance of the materiaL Axioms, rules, stable data in
capitals and patter must be duplicated word for word and
understood. Definitions must be closely duplicated and
understood. General theory and examples must be understood.
If you are in doubt whether the student has duplicated the
data well enough continue the drill.
This coaching method works well only if it is tightly
muzzled. Any extra questions or additives to the exact
procedure of Steps One, Two and Three are destructive. The
coach may understand and acknowledge student originations,
but he must do nothing else not designated in the Drill.
Coaches will flnd that some students may spend some time on
the first few bulletins coached in this manner. However,
the student's ability to duplicate and understand will
improve rapidly and his learning rate will come way up. If
the student has too much difficulty doing this drill, run
Reach and Withdraw on the material to be learned to a flat
point and return to the drill.
If you haven't done this drill you won't know that it
works. Do it, do it exactly as written, and you'll be
winning from there on out in learning Theory.
Issued by:
Fred Hare
Revised & Reissued as BTB
by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis
2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:HH:MH:AL:FH:nt.rd
Copyright c 1963, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
119 HCOB 28 JUL 63 TIME AND THE TONE ARM
(TV5 p. 329-31, NTV VII p. 243-6)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JULY AD13
Central Orgs
Franchise
STAR RATING
TIME AND THE TONE ARM
(HCO Secs: Check out on all Technical staff except
for percentage of cases which is not Star Rated)
I recently completed a study begun many years ago which
gives us new hope and easier auditing of difficult cases.
We have known for many years (Dianetic Axioms) that Time is
the Single Source of human aberration. This did not have
the importance it deserved.
To make an OT one has to clear the Time Track.
This seemed very easy when I discovered a few months ago
that anybody can run an engram. The reasons one can't are
just (1) wrong time of the incident, (2) wrong duration of
the incident, (3) incident may contain an implanted GPM or
(4) it may be false track (therefore having wrong time and
wrong duration).
So anybody that can be put into an auditing session can run
Time Track with good perception. If the perceptions aren't
there it's just wrong time or wrong duration or both, or
it's a GPM in which case one reverts at once to R3N, or
it's false track in which event one finds accurately when
it was installed and the duration of that incident.
All apparent grouping of the track comes either from wrong
time or false track (which is also wrong time). Either one
looks like incidents are grouping.
Well, that seemed to wrap up clearing and OT, but I still
didn't broadly release it; I wanted to be sure. I don't
mind being wrong but I dislike making you wrong in your
auditing, it's already happened too often.
So I carefully researched this all over again and found it
was not enough just to clean track. One had to run track
with TONE ARM MOTION.
That's the real barrier to clear and OT, given the above
data. One can run incidents and GPMs but do these when run
give Tone Arm Motion?
Without Tone Arm Motion no charge is being released and no
actual case betterment is observed beyond a few somatics
removed. The pc's session goals stay the same. The pc's
life doesn't change.
So the clue to OT (and clear) is Tone Arm Motion. It must
exist during the session. If it doesn't something is wrong.
At first I thought that a dating prepcheck "On Dating" or
"On Dates" would re-establish all ceased TA action. It will
up to a point and is valuable.
Repair of cases must contain such a Prepcheck and also
discovering wrong dates and durations on engrams and GPMs.
This is vital.
But it will not make some cases continue to get TA motion
on the Time Track.
If a case, even when cleaned up on dating and properly
assessed for level and Item in R3R or on R3N, does not then
get TA motion on running track, another factor is present.
What is that factor? The pc has a "fragile Tone Arm". Just
one wrong date or duration in R3R or just one wrong RI in
R3N and Tone Arm Action ceases, the TA going way up or down
and staying there. Stuck TA cases then give us a type of case.
So I knew there was another factor involved rather than
Time alone. Time remains the single source. But a pc's
regard for or attitude about Time can make it difficult for
the auditor to run R3R or R3N.
Regard for Time sums up, of course, into ARC about Time, or
just ARC.
THE MECHANICS OF TIME
As in earlier writings Time is actual but is also an
apparency. (See Dianetics '55 or other similar material.)
Time is measured by motion. Motion is Matter with energy in
space. Thus a person can conceive of Time as only Matter
and energy in space. Such as a clock or a planetary
rotation. Time is actual. But the person has become so
dependent on Matter moving in space to tell Time that his
Time Sense has become dependent on Matter, energy and space.
We care only for TA action. Our opinion of a pc's Time
Sense is unimportant. Does the pc get TA action on R3R
and/or R3N? If so, the pc's Time Sense is okay for making
OT straight away. If not, if the TA is "fragile" (sticks
easily high or low) then the pc's Time Sense needs improving.
Time Sense deteriorates to the degree that one has depended
upon Matter, energy and space to tell Time (and on Time
Confusing Implants such as false track; however, running
out false track on a no TA motion case is not an answer).
The dwindling spiral was as follows:
State A - Time Sense.
State B - Time Sense dependent upon Matter, Energy and Space.
State C - ARC Breaks with Matter, Energy, Space and other beings.
State D - Deteriorated Time Sense.
By the time State D is thoroughly reached, you have a pc
who gets no TA motion running track, as energy will not
flow in the absence of Time.
There are four degrees of "Poor Time Sense". The first is
average and common but is not enough to impair TA action.
The TA sticks but getting wrong dates off restores TA
action which then continues. The second is a case that has
to be continuously repaired and delicately handled to get
any TA action at all. The third is a case that gets TA
action on repetitive processes or rudiments but not on GPMs
or engram running (while silently moving through an engram
few people get TA action; this comes when they answer "What
happened?": the third under consideration doesn't get any
TA even when answering "What happened?" and rarely if ever
RRs). The fourth is a case that gets no TA action on
repetitive processes and very little if any on Rudiments.
The four types of "Poor Time Sense" compare to
Case Level 5 - (first type above) Gets TA action only when wrong
dates are cleaned up.
Case Level 6 - (second above) Gets TA action only with constant
careful handling and TA action always packing up.
Case Level 7 - (third above) TA action only on some repetitive
processes and rudiments.
Case Level 8 - (fourth above) No TA action on repetitive processes
and only now and then on rudiments.
Case Levels 2 to 4 get TA action no matter what happens.
This then (TA Action) is your best index of Case Levels.
IQ, graphs, tests, behavior in life are all incidental.
Identification (A=A=A) is most easily present when Time
Sense is awry, therefore, the degree a person Identifies
different things establishes the degree of aberration.
PROGRAMMING
Cases are programmed only against TA Action obtainable in auditing.
A case must not be run without TA Action or with minimal TA Action.
A case may be a Case Level 5 and need only a few wrong
dates and durations corrected to get good TA Action. But it
may also be a Case Level 6, 7 or 8.
Trial and error programming is best. Program high and drop
low, no matter what the morale factor may be.
Try to run GPMs, the Goal to Forget, etc, with R3N. If it
can't be done, assess for R3R (Preliminary Step) and run a
chain of engrams. If still no TA, drop to processes for
Case Level 7. If still no TA, drop to processes for Case
Level 8.
You may see by the pc's past auditor's reports what the
Case Level is. How stuck has that TA been?
Don't run a case lower than it easily gets TA Action.
And don't brand a case at a low case level and then never
graduate it upwards. When the lower process is flat, the
upper process should now be runnable.
The story is told by the TA with one exception - auditor
ability and training. But Case Levels 2, 3, 4 are not all
that influenced by the auditor ability. The auditor's skill
has to be pretty good to run Case Level 5 on R3R and R3N.
The auditor doesn't live who can run R3R or R3N on Case
Levels 6, 7 or 8. It just won't run.
In the guess department the bulk of the cases about are 4s
and 5s. A good- sized percentage are 6s and 7s. About 10%
are Case Level 8. About 1% are Case Level 3. Therefore
about 30% of a usual group of pcs will run with good TA on
the Time Track, given trained auditing, without trouble.
Another 30% will run with good TA on the Time Track with
careful coddling and no serious date goofs. Except for the
1% Case 3, the rest will fall into Case Levels 6, 7 and 8,
meaning that about 39% of the cases in Scientology won't
run at once on R3R or R3N, and another 30% (Case Level 5s)
need a Saint Hiller hanging over the auditor's shoulder or
in the chair. And the other 30% (Case Level 4s) will run
very well and easily on R3R and R3N.
So the biggest percentage group (Case Levels 6, 7, 8
combined) need special processes to graduate up to action
with R3R and R3N.
These Case Level 6, 7 and 8 processes now exist and are
being released as rapidly as they are demonstrated
workable. R2H for Case Levels 5 and 6 has already been
released. R2HL for Case Levels 6 and 7 is being readied up
for bulletin. The Corner Process and others for Case Level
8 are tested and the data is being assembled. And other
advances can be made.
To audit easily and relaxed with good TA Action on the pc
is my immediate desire for auditors and auditing
supervisors. I feel we are over the hump on this. The
fundamental solution to it - Time and the Tone Arm - is
contained in this HCO Bulletin.
Don't audit a pc without getting TA Action. Either repair
the wrong dates and durations before going on or drop to
processes of a lower case level or both.
ARC Breaks in session won't stop a TA. Only Time errors.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
120 HCOB 29 JUL 63 SCIENTOLOGY REVIEW
(TV5 p. 332-3, NTV VII p. 247-9)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY 1963
Central Orgs
Franchise
SCIENTOLOGY REVIEW
(HCO Secs, take up at a Staff Meeting.
Field Auditors, take up at group meetings.)
Exactly where are we technically, personally and organizationally?
It may be of some surprise to you that we have just about
arrived. We've been so long on the road that some fainter
hearts have begun to despair and less high case levels have
begun to gloom.
Since last October I have been cracking through trying to
get there before we were got.
It now is obvious that we have made it and even if we were
hard hit socially or politically we would still make it.
For we have the data.
I have not had time to get it all to you yet, but the data
is now assembled for OT for everyone who can be audited at
all. You already have most of it.
On the various PTPs of Scientology we have had some very
significant wins as follows:
1. The discoveries about Time and the Tone Arm (HCO
Bulletin of July 28, AD13) related to case levels tells us
if a case is winning, why it isn't winning and how to make
it win, and gives us far less worries as auditors auditing
cases. For some time now, overlooking four score of cases,
many very rough, I have been breathing easy. And they're
all winning.
2. Getting cases to RR on GPMs is entirely a matter of
auditing those cases who don't on current basic processes
until they do. So it isn't a worry about getting the case
to RR. It's only how to get the case to run with TA action
and get high enough to RR and run GPMs. We have the
patterns and technology needful now.
3. ARC Breaky Cases. The ARC Break Assessments correctly
done finish the problem of the consequences of ARC Breaks
and put the Auditor at cause over ARC Breaks.
4. Natter. Persons who get auditing and natter, staff
members who snap and snarl, bad morale, all wrap up in the
ARC Break Assessments. This, done weekly in any group on
group members, clearing every line, restores a theta
atmosphere.
5. Incredulity of our data and validity. This is our
finest asset and gives us more protection than any other
single thing. If certain parties thought we were real we
would have infinitely more trouble. There's actual terror
in the breast of a guilty person at the thought of OT, and
without a public incredulity we never would have gotten as
far as we have. And now it's too late to be stopped. This
protection was accidental but it serves us very well
indeed. Remember that the next time the ignorant scoff.
6. The cold war has gotten less threatening, differences
are less violent. We have had the time we needed.
7. Government attacks have entered a more desultory stage.
Meters will go to jury trial eventually and we will
certainly win. The U.S. Government Attorney handling the
case became terribly ill and had to resign it.
8. Economic Problems. In organizations gross income is
generally on the increase throughout the world, and shows
no signs of dwindling and all this in the face of bad
press. Personal income depends upon steady organizational
gains and more positive results on pcs. Future personal
income is without ceiling.
9. Personal States of Case. If you heed HCO Bulletin of
July 28, AD 13 and are getting good Tone Arm action on any
process you will eventually make OT. OT is wholly a matter
of consistent Tone Arm motion, session after session, not
the significance of what is run.
10. State of Training as Auditors. Although I would like
to see more auditors trained at Saint Hill, general
training has improved and training data is complete.
Shortened training time will soon be a reality. A new
positive goal for HPA/HCAs will make more good auditors. I
feel very good about general auditing ability. I recently
summed up the basic skills of auditing and find that over
the years we have been working right along and winning on
training. All training done has been to the good. Changing
technology has not influenced the basic skills and
forthcoming material follows the pattern in which we have
been trained.
OTHER PROBLEMS
Solutions unexpectedly leaped up in fields where we were
only vaguely aware of problems.
We bought an awful lot of time with the discovery of the
exact nature of between lives implants and how it's worked.
Using this data it is possible to keep any Scientologist
from ever getting another one of those implants. As the
general course of living is therapeutic, it takes violent
implants such as Earth people get at every death to keep
people unaware of former lives and aberrated. Just by
omitting those implants and using their reporting
technology to keep in touch amongst ourselves, we would
salvage the lot in a few hundred years in any event. Our
data is too widely disseminated to be re-collected and burned.
And just the other day I was personally looking over their
shoulders.
World clearing is possible without extensive Auditing if we
just keep our own show on the road and keep track of each
other.
This was a breakthrough I didn't expect. And it's all ours.
The discovery of false pasts and futures was also a bonus.
For it means more TA action on more cases and faster clearing.
It's doubtful if ordinary track ever hurt anybody.
SUMMARY
All we've got to do is keep going as we are for things to
improve now.
The only thing which could slow us down is our own
self-created dissidence. All we have to do is do our jobs
and keep the peace and we've got it.
The make-break point is behind us. Ahead are only better
days, improving little by little, day by day.
We've made it over the worst part.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
121 HCOB 29 JUL 63 R3R-R3N-R3T, CAUTIONARY HCOB
(NTV VII p. 250-1, previously considered confidential)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY AD 13
Issue II
Remimeo
R3R-R3N-R3T
CAUTIONARY HCOB
I have been working hard to clarify time track, work which
was more or less left off in 1952.
With the discovery of the relationship of time and the tone
arm, I immediately went to work to see if any eager loops
had used time confusion in order to immobilize and
incapacitate a thetan.
I found almost at once that false timing of incidents was
not only used but very nearly specialized in. The exact
character of the between-lives implants only then came to
view and could be mapped, and other implants of earlier
times were disclosed.
Entire false pasts and futures have been installed and even
actual dates and incidents have been grouped.
This is good news rather than bad news for it gives one a
measure of the effort necessary to keep a thetan aberrated
and gives us the reason some persons won't RR or get TA
motion who otherwise might, for all GPMs may be falsely
dated and if correctly dated might run.
This does not mean that R3N or R3R are in any way changed
or that one does not run GPMs.
It does mean that a slight variation in R3R is needed when
false track is found in order to make the dating easier on
it. This will be called R3T. It consists of R3R plus clever
methods of dating that get past implanted dates.
Meanwhile, be very careful in dating. No dates released on
anything may be accurate including the Helatrobus Implants.
I'm sorry if this held anybody back. But as usual you know
as soon as I know.
So carry on. Get TA action on your pc. But be very cautious
about accepting dates without checking "Is this incident
and date in a false past? Is this incident and date in a
false future?" The best trick is to find if "Right now" or,
as in the between-lives implants, "The year zero" exists in
the false track and date it. "Was the year zero hundreds of
years ago, thousand . . ., etc." Clever, eh?
Some of you have been groaning about these skillions of
trillions of years. They're usually found early on in
auditing only on false track.
Good hunting.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
==================
122 HCOPL 30 JUL 63 CURRENT PLANNING
(OEC V4 p 344-5)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1963
CenOCon
Franchise
Students Sthil
Not for M.A.
CURRENT PLANNING
(Staff Meeting Material)
It may help you to know the immediate future planning in
Scientology.
Research-wise O.T. is wrapped up. It's just a matter of
getting the data out, getting it applied. The Track is
complicated. The length of time in processing is long. But
this is offset by the fact that IF YOU GET CONSISTENT TA
ACTION THE CASE WILL EVENTUALLY MAKE O.T.
ORGANIZATION OF SUBJECT
I am dividing Scientology data into five levels and I think
you will see the usefulness of this.
FIRST LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY ONE
Useable data about living and life, applicable without
training, presented in Continental Magazines and booklets.
This is for anyone. It contains assists as its auditing
level. You have much of this already around. It is a
complete unit in itself. "Be Right With Scientology."
SECOND LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY TWO
Academy HPA/HCA accomplishment level. Scientology for use
in spiritual healing. This is a healing strata, using the
wealth of past processes which produced results on various
illnesses. I am shortly sending out questionnaires to get
all Healing process results as a research project. The
auditing level is Reach and Withdraw and Repetitive
Processes. The target is human illness. We have never
entered this field but as we are not thanked for staying
out of it, we might as well dominate it. It is a good
procurement area.
THIRD LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY THREE
Clearing and O.T. preparatory levels including advanced
auditing above HPA/HCA Level. The work on this was more or
less suspended when it became obvious that O.T. had to be
attained. Includes key out clearing and other sub O.T.
states. However, much technology exists on it. This is the
level of the better human being.
FOURTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FOUR
Processes to O.T., Saint Hill Special Briefing Course 1963
type technology and targets.
FIFTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FIVE
Scientology applied at a high echelon to social, political
and scientific problems. This requires the earlier levels
and a high state of training on theoretical and wide
application levels.
Data for levels one to four is mostly already researched,
most of it is in your hands and many publications already
exist. Level Three needs a lot of codifying but is not
difficult to assemble. You'll see a lot of Level One now
from me for magazines and a lot of new booklets using older
materials. Level Four is more or less complete, more so now
than three.
This brings a lot of order to our technical and gets us past
the "past lives" scramble and other points which slow dissemination
by relegating these to upper levels. Lord knows we have enough
fascinating data at Level One without feeding the public
Level Four.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
We are neating up the corporate structures of Scientology,
using each org as a company whose majority shares are owned
by a central company. This makes the structure easier to
handle and better off for tax purposes. The instructions on
this will soon be released. Shares and Life Memberships
will all be properly adjusted.
ORGANIZATIONAL ATTITUDE
Finding exactly who we're up against on Earth (the A.M.A.)
helped. But finding exactly what each one of us faces and
how in the Between Lives Area bids for a change of mood.
We're not now in this for play. Our personal futures depend
on keeping going and making no major flubs. It isn't a
question of is there something else. There isn't. Nobody
can be half in and half out of Scientology. Scientologists
are Scientologists no matter what they do for a living.
If we're going to make this we have to work at it personally,
administratively and as a group and work well.
The prize is regaining self and going free. The penalty for
our failure is condemnation to an eternity of pain and
amnesia for ourselves and for our friends and for this planet.
If we fail we've had it. It's not just a matter of getting
killed. It's a matter of getting killed and killed and
killed life after life forever more. Even if you have no
great reality on this now you will soon enough. But
probably you already understand it.
Those guys up there mean business. We've got to match or
better their energy level and dedication or we lose.
We've been given this priceless chance.
We must make good.
The hour lost on natter, the slow down time because of some
petty ARC Break have to be salvaged.
We haven't any time for doubts and maunderings.
We're the elite of Planet Earth, but that's only saying
we're the not quite gone in the graveyard of the long gone.
Somehow, despite our condition and the degraded environment
we're in, we've got to keep the dedication and the guts to
carry through no matter what comes. And carry through.
And that's our future.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[See also HCO Policy Letter 21 August 1963, Change of
Organization Targets, OEC Volume 2, Page 95.]
==================
123 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 PUBLIC PROJECT ONE
(OEC Vol 2 p. 93-4, NTV VII p. 253-4)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 AUGUST 1963
BPI
MA
HCO Secs
URGENT
PUBLIC PROJECT ONE
All Scientologists with or without certificates and
particularly those who are in continuous contact with the
public are urgently requested to advise me concerning data
from Scientology they have found particularly acceptable to
the general public.
I have been waiting a long time until research was wrapped
up to O.T. to put heavy power on public dissemination.
Scientology is now partitioned into five levels, as follows:
FIRST LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY ONE
Useable data about living and life, applicable without
training, presented in Continental Magazines and booklets.
This is for anyone. It contains assists as its auditing
level. You have much of this already around. It is a
complete unit in itself. "Be Right with Scientology."
SECOND LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY TWO
Academy HPA/HCA accomplishment level. Scientology for use
in spiritual healing. This is a healing strata, using the
wealth of past processes which produced results on various
illnesses. I am shortly sending out questionnaires to get
all Healing process results as a research project. The
auditing level is Reach and Withdraw and Repetitive
Processes. The target is human illness. We have never
entered this field but as we are not thanked for staying
out of it, we might as well dominate it. It is a good
procurement area.
THIRD LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY THREE
Clearing and O.T. preparatory levels including advanced
auditing above HPA/HCA Level. The work on this was more or
less suspended when it became obvious that O.T. had to be
attained. Includes key out clearing and other sub O.T.
states. However, much technology exists on it. This is the
level of the better human being.
FOURTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FOUR
Processes to O.T., Saint Hill Special Briefing Course 1963
type technology and targets.
FIFTH LEVEL: SCIENTOLOGY FIVE
Scientology applied at a high echelon to social, political
and scientific problems. This requires the earlier levels
and a high state of training on theoretical and wide
application levels and the personal state of O.T.
The subject of this Policy Letter is Scientology One. You
know far more about acceptability of data at public levels
than I do. Please then help me re-assemble this data.
Address your communication directly to me. Label it at the top:
SCIENTOLOGY ONE.
Then give me a complete and legible (since I'LL be reading
it) account of what Scientology data you have found of
alert interest to the general public, friends, acquaintances,
just people, professional people, etc., etc.
Tell me where the data came from (what publications or
lectures) if possible.
Tell me how you have presented this data.
Tell me what data you found was NOT acceptable to the
casual public.
Give me all the data you use, alter-ised or not.
Give me any suggestions you may have for compiling
Scientology One data into acceptable form.
Take the matter up with your group or friends to find out what
they find acceptable-unacceptable, interesting-uninteresting
in Scientology.
The object here is to obtain data for and compile very
basic texts for public use and for basic texts for people
presenting Scientology to the public.
Scientology One is itself divided into Theory (data about
life, the mind, beingness and the universe), Practical
(Drills one can do to raise one's ability to handle others
and situations), and Auditing (Assists, ways to get
relaxed, ways to cheer up, ways to handle situations, etc.,
in the everyday business of living, ways to process people
without knowing much about processing, ways to get people
to pass exams, do their work, get along).
Please, I need your dissertation on this. Don't think
somebody else will do it.
We are answering the questions:
What should compose Scientology One? What Theory do we
present that is highly acceptable? What Practical Drills
should we include? What Auditing should we recommend that
we think anybody can do?
My HCO Secretary in any area will assist you in sending
what's wanted. Don't tell her the data, tell me, for I'm
the one that has to compile it. My HCO Communicator will
send it through direct on my lines.
It is needed. It will be read. It will be used.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
124 HCOPL 2 AUG 63 SAINT HILL COURSE CHANGES
(OEC V4 p 433)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East
Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 AUGUST 1963
Students
Central Orgs
SAINT HILL COURSE CHANGES
The following changes in the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course are made effective 6 August AD13.
THEORY SECTION - Jenny Edmonds, HSG, D.Scn. Will specialize
in the 5th Basic (Ability to Study and Apply
Scientology Data), and will handle any non-progressing
student without regard to case reasons for inability to
achieve this basic. Instead the student will be undercut in
data in accordance with the new levels of Scientology (HCO
Poi Ltr of July 30, AD13), omitting Level Two and using
Glossary only at Level Three, but treating students that do
progress at Level Four with only a brief review of Levels
One and Three.
PRACTICAL SECTION - H. Parkhouse, HSG, D.Scn. To work out
and, use the new Auditing Cycle Data as eight new TRs, one
for each Comm Cycle and the last for consecutive use of all
the Comm Cycles contained in the Auditing Cycle.
AUDITING SECTION - F. Hare, HSG, D.Scn. W Unit to
specialize in definition of an Auditor "To Listen". To use
only the TA of the meter. And to use all former auditing as
potential charge to be taken off pc's case using mainly
only the pc to auditor comm line. X Unit to be divided into
three parts, X one using MS, ruds, hav and Comm Cycle, X
two using MS, ruds, hav, Comm Cycle and meter, X three
using R2H. Z Unit to use R3N, R3R and R3T (dating and comm,
3N and 3R where necessary, the Case Level 2 process).
No other changes are made. All former check sheets and
materials to continue as before. The above changes of post
are a reversion to earlier posts held. The auditing change
is due to new discoveries about the Auditing Cycle and
making cases move by TA action. Reach and Withdraw
processes where used in W will specialize in the pc to
auditor Comm Cycle.
Considerable speed up of length of time on course is
expected by reason of these improvements.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.aap
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
125 HCOB 4 AUG 63 E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR
(TV5 p. 334-7, NTV VII p. 255-9)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 AUGUST 1963
Central Orgs
Franchise
ALL ROUTINES
E-METER ERRORS
COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR
The E-Meter has its role in all processing and must be used
well. However an E-Meter can be misused in several ways.
METER DEPENDENCE
The meter in actual fact does nothing but locate charged
areas below the awareness of the pc and verify that the
charge has been removed. The meter cures nothing and does
not treat. It only assists the auditor in assisting the
preclear to look and verify having looked.
A pc can be made more dependent upon the meter or can be
made more independent of the meter, all in the way a meter
is used by the Auditor.
If a pc's case is improving the pc becomes more independent
of the meter. This is the proper direction.
Meter dependence is created by invalidation by or poor
acknowledgement of the Auditor. If the Auditor seems not to
accept the pc's data, then the pc may insist that the
Auditor "see it read on the meter". This can grow up into a
formidable meter dependence on the part of the pc.
The rise of the TA is a "What's It?" The Fall of a meter TA
is an "It's a _______." To get maximum charge off, the pc's
groping (What's It) must become a pc's finding (It's a). If
the pc asks the Auditor what or which reads on the meter and
the Auditor always complies, the pc's TA will rise more and
fall less as the pc is saying, "What's It?" and only the meter
is saying, "It's a _______."
A pc must be carefully weaned of meter dependence, not
abruptly chopped off. The pc says, "What's It?" The Auditor
must begin to ask occasionally, "Well, What's It seem to
you?" and the pc will find his own "It's a _______" and the
TA will fall - as it would not if only the meter were
employed.
Milking the TA of all the action you can get requires that
the pc get most of the "It's a's" for his "What's Its".
(See diagram attached.)
DATING DEPENDENCE
RULE: USE THE METER TO DATE AND VERIFY DATE CORRECTNESS BY
ALL MEANS BUT ONLY AFTER THE PC HAS BEEN UNABLE TO COME UP
WITH THE DATE.
Example: Pc can't decide, after much puzzling, if it was
1948 or 1949. Finally, the Auditor says, "1948" "1949" and
sees the meter reads on 1948 and says, "It was 1948." But
if the pc says, "It was 1948," the Auditor only checks it
if the TA sticks up higher, meaning probably a wrong date.
He checks with, "In this session have we had a wrong date?
That reads, what date was wrong?" and lets the pc argue it
out with himself - TA action will restore.
RIs
Reliable Items have to be clean. The pc can usually tell.
But the pc can't tell the right RI out of a list or the
right goal unless the Auditor sees it RR or fall. But
sometimes the Auditor thinks an RI is clean (no longer
reads having read) when it still has somatics on it. In
this case it's suppressed and the Auditor checks it for
suppress.
The pc saying the RI is not clean (should still be reading)
carries more weight than the meter.
As the pc gets along in running Time Track and GPMs with
their goals and Reliable Items he or she often becomes
better than the meter as to what is right or wrong, what is
the goal, what RI still reads.
METER INVALIDATION
An Auditor who just sits and shakes his head, "Didn't
Rocket Read" can give a pc too many loses and deteriorate
the pc's ability to run GPMs.
In a conflict between pc and meter, take the pc's data.
Why? Because Protest and Assert and Mistake will also read
on a meter. You can get these off, but why create them?
The meter is not there to invalidate the pc. Using the
meter to invalidate the pc is bad form.
You'll have less trouble by taking the pc's data for the pc
will eventually correct it.
The meter is invaluable in locating by-passed charge and
curing an ARC Break. But it can be done without a meter,
just by letting the pc think over each line read to him or
her from the ARC Break Assessment ana say whether it is or
isn't and if it is, spotting the thing by-passed.
CLEANING CLEANS
The Auditor who cleans a clean meter is asking for trouble.
This is the same as asking a pc for something that isn't
there and develops a "withhold of nothing".
Example: Ask "Do you have a present time problem?" Get no
needle reaction.
Ask the pc for the PTP that hasn't read. That is impossible
for the pc to answer. That's what's meant by cleaning a clean.
DIRTY NEEDLE
All dirty needles are caused by the Auditor failing to hear
all the pc had to say in answering a question or
volunteering data.
Charge is removed from a case only by the Comm Cycle pc to Auditor.
The Auditor's command restimulates a charge in the pc. The
only way this charge can be blown is by the pc telling the
Auditor.
"Auditor" means "A listener". The Auditor who has not
learned to listen gets:
First - Dirty Needle
Next - Stuck Tone Arm
Finally - ARC Break
The most important line in Auditing is from pc to Auditor.
If this line is open and not hurried or chopped you get no
Dirty Needles and Lots of TA Action.
To continuously get in Auditor to pc and impede the line pc
to Auditor is to pile up endless restimulated charge on a case.
RULE: TONE ARM ACTION OF ANY KIND WITHOUT ANY SIGNIFICANCE
OF WHAT'S BEHIND IT WILL TAKE A PC TO OT EVENTUALLY.
RULE: THE MOST CORRECT TRACK SIGNIFICANCES RUN BUT WITHOUT
TA ACTION WILL NOT CHANGE BUT CAN DETERIORATE A CASE.
RULE: THE CORRECT TRACK SIGNIFICANCES RUN WITH TA ACTION
WILL ATTAIN OT FASTEST.
Thus we see that an Auditor can get everything right except
TA action and not make an OT. And we see that TA action
without running specific things will make an OT, (though it
might take a thousand years).
Therefore TA action is superior to what is run. Running the
right things with TA action is faster only.
Thus the line pc to Auditor is somewhat senior to the Comm
Line Auditor to pc. (See diagram.)
Don't get the idea that the process is not important. It
is. People were made to talk in psychoanalysis without
getting anywhere but there they probably had no TA and ran
the wrong significances. It takes the right process
correctly run to get TA action. So don't underrate
processes or the action of the Auditor.
Realize that the answering of the process question is
senior to the asking of another process question. A pc
could talk for years without getting any TA action. Got it?
So listen as long as a TA moves.
Learn to see if the pc has said everything he or she wants
to say before the next Auditor action, never do a new
Auditor action while or if the pc wants to speak and you'll
get superior TA action. Cut the pc off, get in more actions
than the pc is allowed to answer and you'll have a Dirty
Needle, then a stuck TA and then an ARC Break.
See the attached drawing of this. And all will suddenly get
clearer about any pc you've audited. And trouble will
evaporate.
By cutting the "Itsa Line" an Auditor can make case gain
disappear.
"Learn To Listen." That's what "Auditor" means.
It has taken me so long to see this in others because I
don't cut the pc's line very often and repair it fast when
I do. So forgive me for bringing it up so late.
When the pc is talking and you're getting no TA, you
already have an ARC Break or are about to get one. So
assess the by-passed charge.
RULE: DON'T DEMAND MORE THAN THE PC CAN TELL YOU.
RULE: DON'T RECEIVE LESS THAN THE PC HAS TO SAY.
Watch the pc's eyes. Don't take auditing actions if the pc
is not looking at you.
Don't give acknowledgements that aren't needed. Over
acknowledgement means acknowledging before the pc has said all.
SUMMARY
Running the right process is vital. Getting TA action on
the right process is skilled auditing.
Listening is superior to asking.
Build up the pc's confidence in his own knowingness and
continuously and progressively reduce the pc's dependence
on a meter.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.cden
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[There is a handwritten drawing attached, approximately as follows]
Basic Error of the Auditing Cycle
Comm Cycle
Cause - Distance - Effect
What's It
C -----------------------------> E
Restim
AUD PC
Itsa
E <---X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X---C
|
|
(1) DN |
(2) Stuck TA V
(3) ARC Br
[Big jagged circle of charge
around the symbol for a thetan]
Body Discomfort
Body Mass
ARC Breaks
[Drawing of a tone
arm showing it going What's It
up from 3 to 4]
[Drawing of a tone
arm showing it going Itsa
down from 4 to 3]
Tone Arm Action
When Itsa Line is
cut, auditing ceases
to work.
==================
126 HCOPL 8 AUG 63 PLANTS IN ACADEMIES - INTRO. OF FORM B (CANC PER OEC)
(OEC V4 p 138)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 8 AUGUST 1963
HCO Sees
Assoc/Org Sees
Tech Dirs
D/T Hat
"PLANTS" IN ACADEMIES - INTRODUCTION OF "FORM" 5B
In times of expansion it is to be expected that
occasionally a government "plant" or active commie will
endeavour to gain access into the Org. The Academy is the
easiest point of entry for a stay of a little time for such
undesirables. For example, a wave of suppositional reports
of this occurred after the recent FDA attack in Washington
DC. If they were true then it was an affront to
Scientology, quite apart from anything else.
However, such an attempt can be regarded, comparatively, as
a rarity. Nevertheless, Directors of Training should have
some easy foolproof method to pick off such and satisfy
themselves that no students are in their Academies for
anything other than what the students stated they were
there for, i.e. to receive training and graduate.
The D/T normally interviews all new students before they
enter on course in his Academy, and this stage would be a
convenient point in which to have a fast check.
Accordingly, during the brief duration of this interview,
the D/T should place the student on the E-Meter which is
set at high sensitivity, and ask with ARC this question:
"Are you here for any other purpose than what you
say/state?" This question may need clearing with student
but it should take only a very brief time to clear and
clean. Variations of this question may be used, but this
type question designed as a fast check question on new
students will be referred to henceforth as a Form 5B.
The D/T is merely to be satisfied that the new student
being interviewed by him is not a "plant". Then, having
cleared the question, and the D/T is satisfied the student
is bona fide, the D/T can then brief the student crisply
for starting course, etc, and bring the interview quickly
to a close.
Remember, the question is designed to pick up "plants" and
such an attempt will be very rare but nevertheless may
occur from time to time. In the event of the D/T having
some doubt on the person being interviewed by him, he
should refer the person to the Technical Director
immediately for a further check.
The totality of the duration of the D/T interview need not
be more than 10 minutes in its entirety. Judgement is
required by the D/T in administering this "filter point" in
that it is not intended to act as a complete embargo on all
and every student whether bona fide or otherwise. The
chances of the latter being attempted are slim but this
Form 5B should now handle such an attempt smoothly.
Issued by: Peter Hemery
HCO Sec WW
for L. RON HUBBARD
Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
127 HCOB 9 AUG 63 DEFINITION OF RELEASE
(TV5 p. 338, NTV VII p. 260)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1963
HCO Secs
Org Secs
Franchise
Field
BPI
DEFINITION OF RELEASE
(Cancels HCO Bulletin of 14 January 1963)
A RELEASE is one who knows he or she has had worthwhile
gains from Scientology processing and who knows he or she
will not now get worse.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.rd
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
129 HCOB 11 AUG 63 ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS
(TV5 p. 338, NTV VII p. 261)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 AUGUST 1963
Central Orgs
Franchise
ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS
In a session don't ever do an ARC Break Assessment until
the pc has given up trying to untangle it. This
particularly applies to R3R and 3N.
DATES R2H
Don't ever date anything for the pc until the pc has
completely given up trying himself.
DON'T USE METERING, ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS, DATING, or
incomprehensible or new commands to CUT THE ITSA LINE. Let
it run. Help only when it's stopped.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.jh
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
==================
130 HCOPL 12 AUG 63 CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS
(OEC V5 p 180-2)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 AUGUST 1963
BPI
CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS
(Changes earlier policies where these are at variance)
The certificate of HUBBARD GRADUATE AUDITOR (ST HILL)
CLASS ____ will hereafter be issued for successful
completion of the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
The certificate HUBBARD CLEARING SCIENTOLOGIST will no
longer be issued but may be converted to HUBBARD SENIOR
SCIENTOLOGIST. No further courses for this level may be
enrolled in Academies until such time as Scientology Three
is codified. HUBBARD SENIOR SCIENTOLOGIST may be given for
HCA/HPA retread.
The certificates HUBBARD CERTIFIED AUDITOR for the US and
HUBBARD PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR for the UK and Commonwealth
will continue as the professional certificate issued by
Central Organizations. It is given for successful
completion of an Academy HCA/HPA Course.
This certificate and no other (except HDA as follows) is
requisite for the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
The certificate for Scientology One is HUBBARD BOOK
AUDITOR. This is granted under various conditions in the
Orgs. The reason being that no book auditor should audit
without a certificate. It replaces HUBBARD APPRENTICE
SCIENTOLOGIST and this certificate may be exchanged by
anyone for a HUBBARD BOOK AUDITOR certificate. (I do not
personally sign this certificate. It is signed by letterpress.)
CLASSIFICATION
Classification is in addition to certification and is by
additional examination by HCO.
Classification is sealed on any certificate by "Class" and
large Roman Numerals and a Hubbard Communications Office
ring, the Roman Numerals denoting Class to be huge and in
the centre of the seal.
HBA may be sealed with a Class I.
HCA/HPA may be sealed with a Class I or a Class II.
HSS may be sealed with a Class II or Class III.
HGA (St Hill) may be sealed with a Class III, Class IV
or a Class V.
The object of class is that course completion alone may
award a certificate. But course proficiency is denoted by a
Class Seal. Auditors who have difficulty getting results
should not be classed.
Classses and certificates are now fully aligned and
permanent in comparison with the five levels of Scientology
HCO Policy Letter of August 2, AD 13 and Classification
Policy Letters.
Classification is not a matter of obligation to HCO. It is
a special award and is not owed to anyone.
HANDLING OF ISSUE
It is required that the following policies of issue be followed.
HBA - Issue certificate to anyone who is auditing
industriously. Give Class I only to such as also take new
Comm Course training.
HCA/HPA - Issue only to Academy students who complete their
check sheets. Classify certificate as Class I inevitably
but as Class II on the basis of staff employment or retread.
HSS - Issue certificate to HPA/HCA retread if promised.
Classify as II or III only on the basis of further retread
or staff employment.
HGA (St Hill) - Issue certificate on completion of check
sheets. Classify III on basis of competent auditing.
Classify IV on basis of excellent showing in results on pcs
or on retread at Saint Hill. Classify V only on reaching
OT and retread at Saint Hill.
DOCTOR OF SCIENTOLOGY
This is an honorary degree, not granted for scholastic
reasons but is purely an award to those who at Class III or
IV perform signal service to Scientology activites. An HCS
or HGA (St Hill) is understood to qualify.
FELLOW OF SCIENTOLOGY
This is an honorary award for signal contribution to
Scientology technology beyond the scope of a new process.
The work must be complete and approved. Usually reserved
for Class IV or V auditor.
HUBBARD DIANETIC AUDITOR
This certificate remains in full force.
It may however be exchanged for an HPA/HCA without further
examination and at cost of certificate and preparation of
it. However, HDA is the single exception to acceptance for
Saint Hill training for which it is valid, waiving then the
HCA/HPA requirement.
HONOURS
Any classification may be issued "with honours" providing
the candidate has exceeded the check sheet requirements by
a notable degree and is also eligible for the upper
classification range of that certificate. HBA Class I is
the exception. It is the classification that is given "with
honours". "With honours" however may not be given without
the written recommendation of the candidate's own instructors.
ADMINISTRATIVE CERTIFICATES
Three new certificates totally devoted to administrative actions
and skills are announced herewith and are now available.
The certificate HUBBARD ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR will be
issued to properly qualified persons who have served one
year or more in an HCO or Scientology organization in the
Administrative Division and who have successfully passed
the examination of a permanent staff member as issued or
amended; or who has successfully completed a course in
administration given by a Scientology Organization.
The certificate HUBBARD ADMINISTRATOR will be issued to
properly qualified persons who have served two or more
years on the staff of an HCO or Scientology Organization in
the Administrative Division and who have passed the
required examination; or who have successfully completed a
course in administration given by a Scientology Organization.
The certificate HUBBARD EXECUTIVE will be issued to
properly qualified Hubbard Administrators who have
successfully completed the studies required.
Permanent staff member certificates will no longer be
examined for or issued but may be retained and also
converted to the certificate. Permanent Executive
certificates will no longer be examined for or issued but
may be retained and also converted to Hubbard Administrator
certificates.
RELEASE
Release buttons (an "R" set in the S and double ARC
Triangle of Scientology) may be (and should be) issued to
HGC pcs who have attained its requirement by HCO Sees
without charge.
CLEAR BRACELETS
Silver Clear Bracelets are issued by HCO Sees at the
expense of the HGC or the field pc to those who meet clear
requirements.
(Note: No such bracelet shall be issued until procedure of
test is established in HCO Policy Letters after this date,
all former such tests being cancelled.)
OT AWARDS
Gold OT Bracelets will be issued when requirements are
specified and met.
SCIENTOLOGY PINS
Associate Membership is the sole requirement of a
Scientology pin issue.
MINISTERIAL AWARDS AND INSIGNIA
These are not properly Scientology awards but are
authorized and issued only by Church boards. They are
handled by courtesy by HCOs attached to Churches. These
include Doctor of Divinity, Minister of the Church and
Spiritual Counselor.
There are no other valid Dianetic or Scientology awards.
Any former certificate legally issued by a Scientology
organization may be turned in for any of the above
comparable certificates.
Illegal certificates in Dianetics and Scientology, meaning
any issued by an agency not authorized by HCO, should be
seized and the issuing agency sued by HCOs for violation of
trade mark and copyright and fraud.
ISSUING AGENCY
Hubbard Communications Office has full control of all
certificates and awards of Dianetics and Scientology and
may issue according to policy, and suspend or cancel at
discretion. The basis of issue is competence. The basis of
suspension is violation of ethical use.
The basis of cancellation is failure to comply with the
conditions of an order of suspension.
VALIDITY OF CERTIFICATES
No certificate is valid without my personal or printed
signature, that signature now being fully copyrighted
and trade-marked.
IN FORCE
It is considered as of the date of one day after this
policy letter that all those certificates and awards ever
issued are to be considered in full force regardless of
circumstances except those suspended between March 13, AD13
and August 12, AD 13.
L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:dr.aap
Copyright c 1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Modified by HCO P/L 16 June 1964, Personnel Records Admin
Certs.]
==================